alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Installations and Environmental Menu**

                    - Installations and Environment Home
                    - NEPA Projects
                    - At-Sea Initiatives                        - At-Sea Training
                      - Environmental Planning
                    - Ashore Initiatives                        - Home Basing and Homeporting
                      - Field Carrier Landing Practice (FCLP) 
                      - Aircraft Noise Modeling
                      - Naval Range Complex                           - Range Clearance
                        - Range Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (RAICUZ) Program
                    - Operational Energy
                    - U.S. Navy Stewards of the Sea Outreach Program

**Home Basing and Homeporting**

----

Prior to making home basing and homeporting decisions for our ships, aircraft, and submarines, the Navy considers strategic, operational, training, infrastructure requirements, costs, and potential environmental consequences.The Navy prepares comprehensive environmental planning documents which analyze military operations and training associated with home basing and homeporting, construction of supporting infrastructure, compliance with federal and state environmental regulations and, if applicable, considers potential mitigation measures.Members of the public, federal, state and local officials, Native American tribes and communities, regulatory agencies and non-governmental associations are invited to participate in the process: first, in assisting in defining the scope of the environmental analysis and later, in reviewing the draft findings.Environmental analysis under NEPA generally must be complete and, in the case of an EIS, published, prior to implementation of the proposed action, in order to facilitate an informed decision that supports military mission while balancing environmental concerns.Informed decisions are based on a candid and factual representation of the environmental impacts. The potential impacts of home basing and homeporting decisions depend on the nature of the project, but most home basing analyses address noise, air quality, public health and safety, land use and compatibility, socioeconomics, community services, transportation, biological resources, cultural resources, and hazardous materials and waste.Numerous federal laws and Navy regulations govern the protection and preservation of environmental resources. The Navy strictly adheres to these laws and regulations, and may prepare supporting studies such as aircraft noise modeling, archaeological surveys, biological assessments, dredging plans, wetlands surveys, etc., to support compliance and inform decision making.

 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 13 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 13 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 29 Filed 04/23/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 29 Filed 04/23/2008 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Ron E. Hooper, certify that1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tidelands Royalty Trust “B” for which Bankof America, N.A. acts as Trustee; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing suchcontrols and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  March 28, 2008 /s/ Ron E. Hooper     Ron E. Hooper     Senior Vice President Royalty Management on
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7


                             AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO
               THE METLIFE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS
          (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2003) (THE "PLAN")

         The Plan is hereby amended in the manner set forth below:

     1.  The final sentence of Section 8 is amended to read as follows:

         Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Matching Contributions shall be
         credited in favor of a Participant during the suspension of such
         Participant's deferrals pursuant to Section 4.6 of this Plan, no
         Matching Contributions shall be credited in favor of a Participant to
         the extent such Matching Contributions would not have been vested under
         SIP as of December 31, 2004, and such Matching Contributions that would
         vest after December 31, 2004 shall be credited as provided under the
         MetLife Leadership Deferred Compensation Plan and not under this Plan.

     2.  This Amendment will be effective immediately upon execution.

     3.  Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Plan (including any
amendments thereto) shall continue in full force and effect without amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is approved.

PLAN ADMINISTRATOR


/s/ Margery Brittain
------------------------------------------------------


Date:     12/14/05
          ----------------------------

Witness:  /s/ Rose Alston
          ------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (a) 
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997 and the 
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended 
December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such (b)
statements on Form 10-Q for the six month period ended December 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001045536
<NAME>                                         NovaCare Employee Services, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollar
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         5,860
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  53,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (94)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               63,242
<PP&E>                                         4,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (503)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          71,792
<BONDS>                                        6,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       271
<OTHER-SE>                                     56,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,007
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               569,508
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  563,816<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,094<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               68
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,787
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .09
        
<FN>
(F1) "Total Costs" consist of cost of services and selling and administrative 
expenses.

(F2) "Other Expenses" consist of amortization of goodwill offset by interest
income.
</FN>


</TABLE>
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 2, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-0940 Lower Tribunal No. 20-6391

________________ 

### Christopher Warren Prusaski ,

Appellant, vs. 

### Shutts & Bowen, LLP, etc., et al. ,

Appellees.An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for MiamiDade County, Valerie R. Manno Schurr, Judge. Beck & Lee Trial Lawyers, and Jared H. Beck, and Elizabeth Lee Beck, for appellant. Akerman LLP, and David P. Ackerman, and Jessica Bober Rosenthal (West Palm Beach); Klein Park & Lowe P.L., and Robert M. Klein, for appellees. Before LINDSEY, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed.
Clear All

        13 October 2023    

                    USS New York returns to New York City for Veterans Day events                 
                In honor of Veterans Day, the Amphibious Transport Dock ship USS New York (LPD 21) will participate in New York City’s (NYC) annual Veterans Day celebrations, Nov. 8-12.            

        06 May 2023    

                    USS Cooperstown is Commissioned in New York                 
                NEW YORK – The U.S. Navy commissioned its newest Freedom-variant littoral combat ship, USS Cooperstown (LCS 23) May 8, 2023, in New York City, New York.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05294-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05294-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 7-5 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 7-5 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  News 

Breadcrumb-  News 

## Sols 3895-3897: Navigating Through the Crater Cluster

      By Astrogeology Science Center      July 26, 2023    

Earth planning date: Friday, July 21, 2023

Curiosity is working her way through the “Jau” crater cluster, with the goal of trying to understand how all of these small craters formed and have since been eroded. To do that, the team is hoping to assess the target rocks, any evidence for the impactor, and the morphology of the craters. While the craters are very easy to see in orbital images, the view from the ground is a bit harder to assess, as seen in the above Navcam image. The image shows some broken up blocks of bedrock in the foreground, and small depressions and ridges in the distance. Through a detailed imaging campaign and contact science, the team hopes to gain more insight into the origin of these features, before getting back on the road to continue climbing up Mount Sharp.

Today’s 3-sol plan focused on the crater cluster science with plenty of imaging and contact science. On the first sol, Curiosity will investigate the bedrock target “La Trinite” with DRT, MAHLI, and APXS, and a second target “Rio Javari” with MAHLI and APXS to better understand the target rock properties. The team also planned two large Mastcam stereo mosaics to investigate the depth-to-diameter ratios and erosional state of several craters, and three ChemCam LIBS targets to assess variations in texture and chemistry of the local bedrock. Mastcam will also collect a multispectral observation of the DRT target, along with imaging to assess the movement of fines on the rover deck, and a small mosaic to investigate nearby troughs in the regolith. On the second sol the rover will acquire a long distance ChemCam RMI mosaic looking back towards Peace Vallis – it’s amazing to see how far we’ve come! The plan also includes environmental monitoring activities to look for clouds and dust devils and monitor dust in the atmosphere. Curiosity will drive on the third sol, which will hopefully bring us closer to one of the larger craters in this cluster for even more crater science next week!

By Dr. Lauren Edgar, USGS Astrogeology Science Center.

### Get Our News

These items are in the RSS feed format (Really Simple Syndication) based on categories such as topics, locations, and more. You can install and RSS reader browser extension, software, or use a third-party service to receive immediate news updates depending on the feed that you have added. If you click the feed links below, they may look strange because they are simply XML code. An RSS reader can easily read this code and push out a notification to you when something new is posted to our site.

RSS Icon**

Arizona News

RSS Icon**

Astrogeology Science Center News

RSS Icon**

Astrogeology Science Center News

RSS Icon**

Core Science Systems Mission Area News

RSS Icon**

Planetary Science News

RSS Icon**

Southwest Region News

### Contacts

#### Lauren Edgar, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

ledgar@usgs.gov
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0039 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0039

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on authorising Member States to ratify in the interests of the Community the Seafarers' Identity Documents Convention of the International Labour Organization (Convention 185) (COM(2004)0530 — C6-0167/2004 — 2004/0180(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 304 E , 01/12/2005 P. 0189 - 0190 *

P6_TA(2005)0039

Seafarers' Identity Documents *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on authorising Member States to ratify in the interests of the Community the Seafarers' Identity Documents Convention of the International Labour Organization (Convention 185) (COM(2004)0530 — C6-0167/2004 — 2004/0180(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0530) [1],

- having regard to Article 62(2)(b)(i) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0167/2004),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0037/2005),

1. Approves the proposal for a Council decision;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11809]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Part 1044

RIN 1992-AA26


Office of Security and Emergency Operations; Security 
Requirements for Protected Disclosures Under Section 3164 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Interim final rule; completion of regulatory review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the memorandum of January 20, 2001, from 
the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled 
``Regulatory Review Plan,'' published in the Federal Register on 
January 24, 2001 (66 FR 7702), DOE temporarily delayed for 60 days (66 
FR 8747, February 2, 2001) the effective date of the interim final rule 
entitled ``Security Requirements for Protected Disclosures Under 
Section 3164 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2000'' published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2001 (66 FR 
4639). DOE has now completed its review of that regulation, and does 
not intend to initiate any further rulemaking action to modify its 
provisions. However, based on a written comment received on the interim 
final rule, DOE may make minor, non-substantive changes to the rule. 
DOE will announce any such changes in the notice of final rulemaking 
that will be published in the Federal Register.

DATES: The effective date of the interim final rule amending 10 CFR 
part 1044 published at 66 FR 4639, January 18, 2001, and delayed at 66 
FR 8747, February 2, 2001, is confirmed as April 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geralyn Praskievcz, Office of Security 
and Emergency Operations, (202) 586-4451, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a6d6f786b667364247a786b7961636f7c69704a627b246e656f246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ff8faedfef3e6f1b1efedfeecf4f6fae9fce5dff7eeb1fbf0fab1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 3, 2001.
Spencer Abraham,
Secretary of Energy.
[FR Doc. 01-11809 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 18-2 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Bancinsurance Corporation of our report dated January 24, 2003, included in
the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of Bancinsurance Corporation.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedules of Bancinsurance
Corporation listed in Item 15(a). These schedules are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on
Form S-8 pertaining to the 1984 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan
and the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated January 24, 2003 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Bancinsurance Corporation
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedules included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Bancinsurance Corporation of the year ended
December 31, 2002.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 21, 2003