alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009315EN.01001001.xml

| 23.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/10

---

Notice for the attention of those persons, entities and bodies that have been included by the Council on the list of persons, entities and bodies to which Article 6 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 applies (Annex II)

2009/C 315/06

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 of December 2009 (1).

1

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons, entities and bodies that appear on the above-mentioned list fulfil the criteria set out in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea, and they have consequently been included in Annex II to that Regulation. The Regulation provides for a freezing of all funds, other financial assets and economic resources belonging to the persons, entities or bodies concerned and that no funds, other financial assets and economic resources shall be made available to or for the benefit of such persons, entities or bodies, whether directly or indirectly.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex III of the Regulation, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Articles 8 and 9 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities or bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered.

Any such requests should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's Regulation before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 263(4) and (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 346, 23.12.2009.

1

---
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                          42,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  821,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,769
<INVENTORY>                                    572,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,530,277
<PP&E>                                         574,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                 171,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,273,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          666,448
<BONDS>                                      1,014,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,747
<OTHER-SE>                                     427,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,273,982
<SALES>                                      2,886,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,184,184
<CGS>                                        1,936,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,936,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,326)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,481)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK ALAN LANE,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

MARION FEATHER,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 13-35676

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-02346-PA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Owen M. Panner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 23, 2014** 

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Federal prisoner Mark Alan Lane appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the loss of

good conduct time following a prison disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the dismissal of a section 2241

FILED

SEP 30 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
petition, see Alaimalo v. United States, 645 F.3d 1042, 1047 (9th Cir. 2011), and

we affirm. 

Lane contends that the district court erred by dismissing the instant petition

on the basis of Lane’s previous section 2241 petition. Contrary to Lane’s

contention, the district court did not err by applying Rule 4 of the Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases to the instant petition. See Rule 1(b), Rules Governing Section

2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. Moreover, the district court properly

dismissed the instant petition because Lane’s previous section 2241 petition raised

the same claims and was denied on the merits by the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia. The abuse of the writ doctrine generally

“forbids the reconsideration of claims that were or could have been raised in a prior

habeas petition.” See Alaimalo, 645 F.3d at 1049 (internal quotations omitted). 

Lane has not shown cause for bringing a successive petition, or that a fundamental

miscarriage of justice will result from the failure to entertain his claim. See

McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 494-95 (1991). 

AFFIRMED.

 2 13-35676
**Exhibit 32.0**

** **

**CEO AND CFOCERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTON 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity asan officer of Building Materials Holding Corporation, for purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

•                  the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

•                  the informationcontained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations.

 
| Date:  May 4, 2004 | */s/ Robert E. Mellor*                                        |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Robert E.  Mellor                                             |
|                    | Chairman of  the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    | (Principal  Executive Officer)                                |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----

 

 

 

 

 

 

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity asan officer of Building Materials Holding Corporation, for purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

•                  the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

•                  the informationcontained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations.

 
| Date:  May 4, 2004 | */s/ William M. Smartt*                            |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | William M.  Smartt                                 |
|                    | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                    | (Principal  Financial Officer)                     |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Ronald D. Mogel, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:
September 1, 2010



/S/ RONALD D.
MOGELRonald D. Mogel
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (01-058)]


NASA Advisory Committees; Renewal of the Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of Renewal of the Charter of NASA's Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to sections 14(b)(1) and 9(c) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and after consultation with the 
Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has 
determined that a renewal of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) 
is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon NASA by law. The structure and duties of the ASAP remain 
unchanged. The charter for the ASAP now includes additional details on 
the aspects of safety that the Panel should include in their studies 
and advice to the NASA Administrator. These aspects of safety are fully 
consistent with the Agency Safety Initiative, a major commitment to 
safety as NASA's number one priority. The charter also addresses 
membership terms. In the case of panel members, the Administrator can 
extend members' service by no more than six years beyond their original 
6 year term, thereby limiting service to a total of 12 years. Also, 
consultants will be appointed for a specific task and will serve no 
longer than the time required to complete that specific task, but not 
longer than 1 year. These provisions will ensure that the Panel has 
balanced representation of membership.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kathy Dakon, Assistant Advisory 
Committee Management Officer, Mail Code Z, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-0732.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Information regarding the Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel is available on the world wide web at http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/codeq-1.htm

    Dated: May 3, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-11556 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 752 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 752

 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a program in 
  the maritime environment for the mobile biometric identification of 
    suspected individuals, including terrorists, to enhance border 
                               security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2009

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a program in 
  the maritime environment for the mobile biometric identification of 
    suspected individuals, including terrorists, to enhance border 
                               security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARITIME BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting 
through the Commandant of the Coast Guard, shall conduct, in the 
maritime environment, a program for the mobile biometric identification 
of suspected individuals, including terrorists, to enhance border 
security and for other purposes.
    (b) Requirements.--The Secretary shall ensure the program described 
in subsection (a) is coordinated with other biometric identification 
programs within the Department of Homeland Security.
    (c) Cost Analysis.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
Appropriations and Homeland Security of the House of Representatives 
and the Committees on Appropriations and Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs of the Senate an analysis of the cost of expanding 
the Coast Guard's biometric identification capabilities for use by the 
Coast Guard's Deployable Operations Group, cutters, stations, and other 
deployable maritime teams considered appropriate by the Secretary, and 
any other appropriate Department of Homeland Security maritime vessels 
and units. The analysis may include a tiered plan for the deployment of 
the program described in subsection (a) that gives priority to vessels 
and units more likely to encounter individuals suspected of making 
unlawful border crossings through the maritime environment.
    (d) Definition.--For the purposes of this section, the term 
``biometric identification'' means the use of fingerprint and digital 
photography images.
                                 <all>
```
HEDGE
Street

January 5, 2006

VIA EMAIL: secretary@cftc.gov

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
3 Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

RE: Certification: HedgeStreet Free Trade Promotional Offer — Extension
Dear Secretary Webb:

HedgeStreet, Inc. (“HedgeStreet”), a designated contract market (“DCM”) and derivatives
clearing organization (“DCO”), hereby notifies the Commission that HedgeStreet is
extending its Special Free Trade Promotional Offer (the “Free Trade Promotion”). For the
purposes of this extension, HedgeStreet is relying on its initial filing (which introduces the
Promotion’s terms and conditions) previously submitted to the Commission on January 28,
2005. The Promotion was later amended on three separate occasions to a) extend the
Promotion period by three months (April 1, 2005 — June 30, 2005) on March 22, 2005; and
b) to extend the Promotion period by an additional three months (July 1, 2005 — September
30, 2005) on June 29, 2005; and lastly c) to extend the Promotion period by an additional
three months (September 30, 2005 — December 31, 2005) on September 26, 2005.

Additionally, HedgeStreet hereby notifies the Commission of the extension in its Refer-A-
Friend Program (the “Program”). For the purposes of this extension, HedgeStreet is relying
on its initial filing (which introduces the Program’s terms and conditions) previously
submitted to the Commission on April 12, 2005. The initial filing was later amended on
April 13, 2005 which modified a single condition to the Program.

The Promotion

Asa fully electronic, non-intermediated, retail-based contract market, HedgeStreet is
primarily focused on the retail investor and optimizing his/her trading experience as an
exchange member. By providing an incentive for members to trade, HedgeStreet continues
to implement ways of increasing market liquidity while gaining new market data in the
products currently offered on the exchange. There is a limit of one (1) member participant
per household.

Regulatory Issues
HedgeStreet hereby certifies that the Promotion complies with the Commodity Exchange

Act, as amended, and the Commissions regulations adopted thereunder.

1825 S. Grant Street
Sulte 500
‘San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: 650.638.3500
www.hedgestreet.com ] Fax: 650.638.3501


HEDGE
Street

The purpose of this letter is to notify the Commission of HedgeStreet’s intention to extend
the period of effectiveness for both the Special Free Trade Promotional Offer and the
Refer-A-Friend Program through the end of this year, for expiration on December 31, 2006.

Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned at (650) 638-3511 or sford@hedgestrcet.com.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Ford
Vice President, Legal & Compliance

ce: Riva Adriance — CFTC
Toby Kaczensky — CFTC
Clarissa Manansala — HedgeStreet, Inc.

1825 8. Grant Street
Suite 500
‘San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: 650.638.3500
www.hedgestreet.com Fax: 650.638.3501
April 11, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2663.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of August 2006 Ten Year U.S. Treasury Note options.
This option contract ordinarily would be authorized for trading as of April 24, 2006. Due to
customer demand, the Exchange intends to list this contract earlier than usual (i.e., as of April
12, 2006).
This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.

There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 36 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 10