alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1722 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1722

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to require congressional 
   approval before the appropriation of funds for the Department of 
            Veterans Affairs major medical facility leases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to require congressional 
   approval before the appropriation of funds for the Department of 
            Veterans Affairs major medical facility leases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Build a Better VA Act''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MAJOR 
              MEDICAL FACILITY LEASES.

    (a) In General.--Section 8104(a)(2) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``No funds'' and inserting ``(A) No 
        funds'';
            (2) by striking ``or any major medical facility lease'';
            (3) by striking ``or lease''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) No funds may be appropriated for any fiscal year for any 
major medical facility lease unless the Committees on Veterans' Affairs 
of the Senate and House of Representatives adopt resolutions approving 
the lease.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a lease entered into after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending November 30, 2001 (the "Report"), I, Jay Lutsky, Principal Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Jay Lutsky



 Jay Lutsky,

 Principal Executive Officer and Director

May 21, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              | ENTERCONNECT      INC.                                        |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                                          |
|                              |                                                          |   |
| Date: November      14, 2008 | By:                                                           | /s/ Sam Jankovich |
|                              | Sam Jankovich                                            |
|                              | Chief      Executive Officer and Principal Financial  Officer |

----
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 29 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 29 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 29 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the quarterly report of GelTech Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Cordani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
 
 2.
The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Michael CordaniMichael Cordani

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
 Dated: May 17, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of GelTech Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Hull, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
 
 2.
The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Michael HullMichael Hull

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
 Dated: May 17, 2010
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,439)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,467
<PP&E>                                          38,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,182)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,487
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,989
<SALES>                                          4,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,203
<CGS>                                            4,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,872)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        -
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      -
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric WHEELER, a/k/a “E”, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6332.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Eric Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*255Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Wheeler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewéd the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Wheeler,*No. 4:96-cr-00053-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Clear All

        13 February 2023    

                    USS Gravely Returns to Sea Following Bahamas Port Visit                 
                NASSAU, Bahamas - USS Gravely (DDG 107) departed Nassau, Bahamas, after conducting a theater-security cooperation port visit, Feb. 9.            

        07 April 2022    

                    USS Porter Visits Nassau, The Bahamas                 
                NASSAU, The Bahamas - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) conducted a scheduled port visit in Nassau, The Bahamas, April 3-7. The ship’s arrival marked the first time a U.S. Navy vessel has visited The Bahamas since the COVID-19 pandemic began.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF AMBER RESOURCES COMPANY OF COLORADO

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

     I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Amber Resources Company of Colorado for the year ended December 31, 2010:

 

     (1) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Amber Resources Company of Colorado.

 

 

 

 

/s/ Kevin K. Nanke________

Kevin K. Nanke

Chief Financial Officer

 

March 30, 2011

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Amber Resources Company of Colorado and will be retained by Amber Resources Company of Colorado and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         307,652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,523,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,225,490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,057,046
<PP&E>                                     100,581,046
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,029,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             128,039,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,169,289
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,813
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,394,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               128,038,321
<SALES>                                    112,744,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           112,744,030
<CGS>                                      100,404,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              105,452,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               310,137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,066,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,914,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                   150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,764,451
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,764,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
        

</TABLE>
#### ALEXANDER LACKS *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*Alice Osedach,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Christopher T. Godialis,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 31, 2005

The petitioner Alexander Lacks’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 225 (AC 24533), is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Office of Justice Programs

          - [OJP(OJP)-1313]

# AGENCY:

Office of Justice Programs, Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of record of decision. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, has prepared a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Center for Domestic Preparedness located at Fort McClellan, Anniston, Alabama. This ROD is a statement of the decision made, the background of the project, other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, the preferable alternative, measures to minimize environmental harm, and public involvement in the decision-making process.

# DATES:

The ROD will become effective upon signature by the Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the ROD for the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Center for Domestic Preparedness, Fort McClellan, Alabama, have been provided to the following locations for public review:

1. United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of the General Counsel, Room 5411, 810 Seventh Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531.

2. The Center for Domestic Preparedness, P.O. Box 5100, 61 Parliament Rd., Ft. McClellan, Anniston, AL 36205.

3. Anniston-Calhoun County Public Library, 108 East Tenth Street, Anniston, AL 36202.

4. Jacksonville Public Library, 200 Pelham Road, North Jacksonville, AL 36205.

5. Cole Library, Jacksonville State University, 700 Pelham Road, North Jacksonville, AL 36265-1602.

6. Oxford Public Library, 213 Chocclocco Street, Oxford, AL 36203.

7. Talladega Public Library, 202 East South Street, Talladega, AL 35160.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For copies of the ROD or additional information, please contact: L.Z. Johnson, Director, Center for Domestic Preparedness, P.O. Box 5100, Fort McClellan, Anniston, AL 36205, (256) 847-2000.

Dated: April 27, 2001.

Alexa Verveer,

Deputy Assistant Attorney General.

[FR Doc. 01-11808 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Don Crosbie, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CLAIMSNET.COM INC.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: July 24, 2007   /s/ Don Crosbie   Don Crosbie  Chief Executive Officer
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 20-1821

__________ RONNIE COLEMAN, JR., Appellant

v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT; NEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT; and NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

___________________ _________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-16835) District Judge: Honorable Madeline C. Arleo

___________________ _________________

Submitted Pursuant to Th ird Circuit LAR 34.1(a) December 18, 2020

Before: AMBRO, PORTER a nd SCIRICA, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: December 22, 2020)2 ___________

OPINION *

___________

PER CURIAM Ronnie Coleman, Jr. claims to have been physically harmed by several law enforcement officers, both dur ing an altercation on a tr ain operated by New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Trans it) and during his subsequent detention at the Secaucus Junction Transit Station in Se caucus, New Jersey. Colema n sued only the entities he believed were responsible for his assailants a nd, therefore, his injuries: NJ Transit and the NJ Transit Police Department (collectively, Defendants). 1 Defendants responded with a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing that as a matter of law they are not considered “person[s]” subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the fede ral civil rights statute. The District Court agreed, and concluded as well th at any apparent state law clai ms raised by Coleman were equally defective as a matter of law. The District Court t hus granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 2 This timely appeal followed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. For a pr o se civil rights action like this one, our rule is that “district courts must offer amendment—i rrespective of whether it

* This disposition is not an op inion of the full Court and pu rsuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. 1 Coleman also named “New Jersey Transit Corporate Headquarters” as a defendant, but that appears to be a redundancy. 2 The District Court also denied as moot Coleman’s motion for default judgment.3 is requested—when dismissing a case for fail ure to state a claim unless doing so would be inequitable or futile.” Fletcher-Harlee Corp . v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc., 482 F.3d 247, 251 (3d Cir. 2007). The District C ourt does not appear to have considered whether an opportunity to amend could have benefited Coleman. Cf. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (“[O ]utright refusal to grant th e leave without any justifying reason [i.e., inequity or futility] appearing for the denial is not an exercise of discretion; it is merely abuse of that discretion and inconsis tent with the spirit of the Federal Rules.”). And, from our vantage point, it seems quite possible that an amended complaint could have set forth plausible claims under § 1 983 against the indivi dual law enforcement officers that Coleman made referenc e to in the original pleading. Accordingly, we will vacate the District Court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent w ith this opinion.