alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Fairfield Communities, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 1998, included in
the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Fairfield Communities, Inc.

Our  audits  also  included  the  financial   statement  schedule  of  Fairfield
Communities,  Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the  responsibility of
the Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. We did not audit the 1996 and 1995 consolidated financial statements
of Vacation Break U.S.A.,  Inc., a  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  which  statements
reflect total assets  constituting 36% in 1996, and total revenues  constituting
37% in  1996,  and  30%  in  1995  of the  related  consolidated  totals.  Those
statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us,
and our  opinion,  insofar as it relates to data  included  for  Vacation  Break
U.S.A.,  Inc.,  is based  solely on the  report of the  other  auditors.  In our
opinion,  based on our  audits  and,  for 1996 and  1995,  the  report  of other
auditors, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,  presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3, No.  333-19261)  pertaining to the December 19, 1996 Restricted Stock
Agreement, (Form S-3, No.  333-43045)  pertaining to the Vacation  Break U.S.A.,
Inc. "Selling  Stockholders",  (Form S-3, No. 333-42963)  pertaining to the Apex
Marketing, Inc. "Selling Stockholders", (Form S-8 No.33-55841) pertaining to the
Fairfield Communities,  Inc. Third Amended and Restated 1992 Warrant Plan, (Form
S-8, No. 333-16605) pertaining to the Fairfield Communities, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-27833) pertaining to the Fairfield Communities,
Inc.  Second  Amended and Restated  1997 Stock  Option Plan,  and (Form S-8, No.
333-42901) pertaining to the Vacation Break U.S.A., Inc. Directors' Stock Option
Plan and the Vacation  Break  U.S.A.,  Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan of our report
dated February 2, 1998, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements
incorporated  herein by  reference  and our  report  included  in the  preceding
paragraph  with respect to the  financial  statement  schedule  included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Fairfield Communities, Inc.



Little Rock, Arkansas
March 12, 1998
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 43 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 23


                               CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
Spiegel, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
33-69937, 33-19663, 33-32385, 33-38478, 33-44780, 33-56200 and 33-51755 on Form
S-8 of Spiegel, Inc. of our reports dated February 14, 2002, except for Note 2,
Note 3, Note 4, Note 5, Note 9, Note 11, Note 12 and Note 14, which are as of
January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Spiegel, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 29, 2001, and related
financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 29, 2001
annual report on Form 10-K of Spiegel, Inc.

The audit report on the consolidated financial statements of Spiegel, Inc. and
subsidiaries referred to above contains an explanatory paragraph that the
Company was not in compliance with certain restrictive covenants in its debt
agreements, and accordingly, substantially all of the Company's debt is
currently due and payable. In addition, the Company was not in compliance with
certain provisions of agreements with the insurer of its asset-backed
securitization transactions, and has been unable to negotiate amended agreements
with its lenders. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these
matters are described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. The
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying financial statement
schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of recording revenue for discount club memberships in 2000.

                                                 /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                 KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 31, 2003

                                       92
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### Sean C. FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF CDC; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-16135.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 23, 2013.

Sean C. Fisher, Imperial, CA, pro se.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*576MEMORANDUM **

Sean C. Fisher, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights and negligence under state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 as Fisher has voluntarily dismissed with prejudice his remaining claims. *See Dannenberg v. Software Toolworks, Inc.,*16 F.3d 1073, 1076-78 (9th Cir.1994) (a voluntary dismissal with prejudice precludes possibility of later pursuing the dismissed claims). We review de novo. *Ramirez v. Galaza,*334 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

Consistent with our prior memorandum disposition, the district court considered Fisher’s claims that he had been denied access to the prison grievance system and retaliated against, and properly concluded that Fisher had failed to allege sufficient facts to state a First Amendment claim against all but two of the named defendants because the allegations in the complaint demonstrated that Fisher had availed himself of the grievance process on numerous occasions and his appeals were rejected on procedural bases. *See id.*at 860 (inmates lack a separate constitutional entitlement to a specific prison grievance procedure); *see also Brodheim v. Cry,*584 F.3d 1262, 1271 (9th Cir.2009) (to prevail on a retaliation claim, a plaintiff must show that his protected conduct was the substantial or motivating factor behind the defendant’s conduct).

Contrary to Fisher’s contentions, our prior memorandum disposition expressed no opinion as to the sufficiency of Fisher’s allegations, but instead simply held that the amended complaint comported with the pleading standards set forth in Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Fisher’s contentions regarding the district court’s review of the magistrate judge’s screening order are unsupported.

Fisher’s motion for judicial notice is granted.

Fisher’s motion for “disposition of this appeal to be designated an opinion” is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 24 – Wildfire Risk to Communities      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we hear about a national wildfire risk tool built using satellite-derived mapping data produced at EROS.

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

Download and Transcript Access

**Summary**: The U.S. has plenty of data on wildfire risk. There are local and regional risk assessments, complex datasets like LANDFIRE and tracking tools like the EROS Fire Danger Monitor, as well as a host of resources and research projects devoted to the subject. But much of that information is steeped in the language of fire science and difficult to comprehend for those outside it. In this episode, we hear from Frank Fay of the USDA Forest Service, who describes a new website that represents the first national tool on wildfire risk designed with communities and the general public in mind. The tool was built with data from the LANDFIRE program and numerous other sources, and offers a window into fire risk for every community in the U.S.

**Guests**: Frank Fay, USDA Forest Service

**Host**: John Hult

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: May 4, 2020

**More on wildfire risk**: 
                            - Wildfire Risk to Communities
                            - LANDFIRE Proves Critical to First Nationwide Tool on Wildfire Risk to Communities
                            - LANDFIRE home page

### Contacts
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

**THE        EXECUTIVE STATES THAT HE HAS FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY **

**ENTERED        INTO THIS AGREEMENT AND THAT HE HAS READ AND **

**UNDERSTOOD        EACH AND EVERY PROVISION THEREOF. THIS AGREEMENT IS**

**EFFECTIVE        UPON THE EXECUTION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY BOTH PARTIES.**

**UNDERSTOOD,        AGREED, AND ACCEPTED:**

| **VISHAL                GARG**       |   | **IEMPOWER.                INC** |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                 |   |                             |   |
| /s/                Vishal Garg       |   | By:                              | /s/                Raza Khan |
|                                      |   |                             | Name:                  Raza KhanTitle:                  Managing Director |
|                                 |   |                             |   |
| Date:                _______________ |   |                             | Date:                _______________ |

----
Filed 9/22/22 In re Y.O. CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re Y.O., a Person Coming

Under the Juvenile Court

Law. 2d Juv. No. B 318447

(Super. Ct. No. 21JV

- 00004 )

( San Lui s Obispo County)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Y.O.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Y.O. appeals from the judgment of the San Luis Obispo

County Juvenile Court requiring him to submit to warrantless

searches of his electronic devices as a condition of his probation.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.

After an examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief

that raises no arguable issues. On Ju ly 6 , 2022, we notified

appellant by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally2

submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. The

30 days have since passed, and appellant has not presented any

contentions or issues for our considerat ion.

In February 2021, appellant was declared a ward of the

court and placed on probation after he admitted to being a minor

in possession of a firearm and public intoxication. ( Welf. & Inst.

Code, § 602; Pen. Code, §§ 29610, 647, subd. (f).)

In Feb ruary 2022, appellant admitted he violated the terms

of his probation after h e was contacted by law enforcement

during a traffic stop and found to have a “ghost gun” in the trunk

of his vehicle, along with three “grocery

- size bags” filled with

marijuana

, and several small baggies

. The juvenile court ordered

that a ppellant continue as a ward of the court with additional

terms and conditions of probation , including an electronics search

condition that required him to submit his elect ronic devices and

password s to law enforcement , effective upon his release from

custody

.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that

appellant’s attorney fully complied with his responsibilities and

that no arguable issue exists. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d

436.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

.

YEGAN, A cting P. J.

We concur:

PERREN , J. 

BALTODANO , J.

* Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District,

assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California

Constitution.Denise De Bellefeuille , Judge

Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo

______________________________

Leonard J. Klaif , under appointment by the Court of

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.
Exhibit 21.1

EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|Subsidiary Name                         |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |  | Names Under Which
Each Subsidiary Does Business
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Evans & Sutherland Graphics Corporation |  | Utah                                                         |  | Evans & Sutherland Graphics Corporation        
|Evans & Sutherland Computer Limited     |  | United Kingdom                                               |  | Evans & Sutherland Computer Limited            
|Spitz, Inc.                             |  | Delaware                                                     |  | Spitz, Inc.                                    
|Xionix Simulation, Inc.                 |  | Georgia                                                      |  | Xionix Simulation, Inc.                        
|REALimage, Inc.                         |  | Delaware                                                     |  | REALimage, Inc.                                

---



QuickLinks
August 17, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581
Reference File #2576.01
Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Amendments to Rule 221.00(c) per the attached text (additions underlined; deletions
bracketed and struck through).

The referenced amendments are designed to clarify certain terminology concerning the extent of
member lessors’ potential liability for claims against their delegates (lessees).

The CBOT intends to implement these amendments one day after the Commission’s receipt of
this filing.

There were no opposing views concerning these amendments.

The CBOT certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
tules thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b081605


Additions underlined; Deletions bracketed and struck through.

221.00 Delegation - An individual member may delegate the rights and privileges of a Series B-
1 (Full), Series B-2 (Associate), Series B-3 (GIM), Series B-4 (IDEM), or Series B-5 (COM)
membership to an individual (a "delegate") upon the following terms and conditions:

(c) (1) | The member shall remain liable for an amount up to, but not in excess of,
the value of the member trading rights [membership] (and the lessor’s shares of
Class A common stock of CBOT Holdings if, and only to the extent that, such
shares are registered for an e-cbot member firm or a member firm affiliate under
Rule 230.00 or Regulation 450.02D) for the debts, acts and delinquencies of the
delegate (or the e-cbot member firm or member firm affiliate, if applicable)
arising from the delegate’ 's use of the member trading rights [exereise-ofrights-and

)]. The member trading rights [membership] so delegated
(and the lessor’s shares of Class A common stock of CBOT Holdings described
above, if applicable), may be sold to satisfy any such liability in accordance with
the Rules and Regulations of the Exchange. Delegation shall not relieve the
member of any of his obligations or liabilities which he might otherwise have by
virtue of being a member of the Exchange to other members of the Exchange;
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         123,023
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   20,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                      2,710
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               230,127
<PP&E>                                                         145,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               1,272,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           51,379
<BONDS>                                                        700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (14,794)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 1,272,515
<SALES>                                                           3776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 58591
<CGS>                                                             6840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    53
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              (21156)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     41622
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (2763)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (2763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0
        


</TABLE>