alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2






CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 I, Chris Benjamin, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quantum Materials Corp.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance  with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 February 28, 2013

/s/ CHRIS BENJAMIN

Chris Benjamin, Principal Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 16 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 16 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 63 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Victoria J. Greenidge. Herbert Rubin, as Conservator, Respondent; Claire Madden et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding for a final judicial settlement of the account of the conservator of Victoria J. Greenidge, deceased, the objectants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated October 27, 1986, as denied their objections to the account and awarded counsel fees and disbursements to the law firm of which the conservator was a member.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the respondent to the appellants, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens *737County, for a hearing and new determination as to counsel fees and disbursements.

We find that the Supreme Court erred in summarily denying the objections raised in connection with the conservator’s request for additional counsel fees and disbursements. The record does not contain a categorical breakdown of the legal services rendered. Thus, it is impossible to ascertain whether or not the fees listed are duplicative, as alleged by the objectants. In addition thereto, factual issues exist, *inter alia,*as to whether the law firm, of which the conservator is a senior partner, charged fees in connection with its efforts to obtain judicial approval for the demolition of a structure on the conservatee’s real property and whether an advance of $2,500, which had been paid to Taff Trucking in furtherance of the demolition project, was refunded to the conservatee’s estate after the conservator elected not to proceed with the project.

In view of these disputed questions of fact, summary disposition of the matter was improper *(see, Citibank v Northwood Group,*60 AD2d 832). Accordingly, we direct that a hearing be conducted so that proof as to the precise nature and extent of the services performed may be submitted *(see, Matter of Le Bovici [Sodano*— Bartholomew], 135 AD2d 635; *Matter of Gurland,*22 AD2d 696) and an appropriate determination as to reasonable counsel fees and disbursements may be made. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 28 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 28 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
cme @

2-2 AYE]: EQ chicago Mercantile Exchange

20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax
www.cme.com

November 2, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Section Sc(c)(1), Part 40.6 — Retraction on the amendments to the
minimum tick for the Russell 2000 options contract.
CME Submission# 05-114.

Dear Ms. Webb:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME” or “Exchange”) hereby notifies the Commission of a
retraction of the amendments made to the minimum tick fluctuations for the Russell 2000 options
contract.’

The Exchange certifies that this action complies with the Act and rules thereunder.

In compliance with CFTC regulation, CME is retracting the variable tick amendment made to the
Russell 2000 options contract. This amendment was submitted in conjunction with an amendment made
to the minimum tick fluctuations for the E-Mini Russell 2000 options contract. The Russell 2000
contract will retain its original rules. Please note, however, that the amended rules for the E-Mini
contract will be implemented as planned on November 5, 2005.

If you require any additional information regarding this action, please do not hesitate to contact

Ms. Ariel Hantin, Senior Research Analyst at 312-559-4951 or via e-mail at ahantin@cme.com. Please
reference our CME Submission #05-114 on all future correspondence regarding this notification.

? Please reference CME Submission# 05-106, submitted on October 26, 2005.


Retraction of Russell 2000 tick amendments
November 2, 2005
Page 2 of 2

Sincerely,

John W. Labuszewski, Director
Research & Product Development

ce: Mr. Thomas M. Leahy and Mr. Steven B. Benton
CFTC Division of Market Oversight, Product Review & Analysis Section
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-412-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 10, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 7, 2001, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company 
(Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the 
filing, to be effective June 7, 2001.
    Algonquin states that the purpose of this filing is to make the 
benefits and opportunities of e-commerce available to Algonquin's 
existing and potential customers and to advance the Commission 
objectives as expressed in Order Nos. 637, et seq. of providing 
equality between the pipeline services and capacity release 
transactions.
    Algonquin states that the proposed tariff modifications permit 
customers to request service agreements electronically and to execute 
such contracts on line via the LINKr System, which will facilitate 
nomination and increase the efficiency and convenience of the Algoquin 
contracting process for all customers.
    Algonquin states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12289 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#                                                                         Naval Air Force Atlantic nuclear-trained officer shares personal story, inspires students at ‘STEM Academy’                                                                     

##### by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Tatyana Freeman 

26 July 2023

            SLIDESHOW | 4 images | CNAL Capt. Speaks To STEM Students                    CHESAPEAKE, Va. (July 20, 2023)- Capt. Kathryn Wijnaldum, assigned to Naval Air Force Atlantic, speaks to children attending the Naval Information Warfare Center (NIWC) Atlantic's science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) camp at Tidewater Community College. The camp is a part of NIWC's STEM outreach program that collaborates with academia, government organizations, local businesses, and professional organizations to increase STEM interest and literacy in the community and to provide a pipeline for future STEM talent. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Tatyana Freeman)        

                    CNAL Capt. Speaks To STEM Students                                            1 of 4                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    CNAL Capt. Speaks To STEM Students                                            2 of 4                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    CNAL Capt. Speaks To STEM Students                                            3 of 4                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    CNAL Capt. Speaks To STEM Students                                            4 of 4                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

Tags:
**stem**naval information warfare center**CNAL
#### Douglas Alan BURDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNKNOWN PARTY; State of Texas; Lolita Ramos; David Barlow; Layne Walker; Steve McKeithen; Don Burgess; David B. Gualtney; Carol Anne Flores; Charles A. Kreger; Hollis Horton, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-41057

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 2013.

Douglas Alan Burden, Huntsville, TX, pro se.

Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Douglas Alan Burden, Texas prisoner # 1160823, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in which he argues that his due process rights were violated because he was improperly denied his right to appeal his Texas aggravated assault conviction. He asserts that the state trial court misapplied Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and erred in completing the certificate of the right to appeal (COR-TA) form and that the rule was not applicable to the proceeding in which the state trial court adjudicated his guilt and sentenced him to 35 years of imprisonment. He also contends that his waiver of the right to appeal was not valid.

The district court did not err in dismissing Burden’s complaint for failure to state a claim. *See Dorsey v. Portfolio Equities, Inc.,*540 F.3d 333, 338 (5th Cir.2008). Burden had no federal constitutional right to a direct appeal, *see Register v. Thaler,*681 F.3d 623, 628 (5th Cir.2012), and he did not allege sufficient facts to show specifically that the state courts deprived him of his right to appeal his conviction without constitutionally adequate process by applying Rule 25.2 and the CORTA form or to show that his waiver of the right to appeal was not valid. *See Ridgely v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency,*512 F.3d 727, 734 (5th Cir.2008). Further, to the extent that Burden avers that the state courts misapplied Rule 25.2(a)(2) and made errors when completing the CORTA form, the district court did not err in dismissing his complaint as he has alleged violations of state law only. *See Jackson v. Cain,*864 F.2d 1235, 1251-52 (5th Cir.1989).

*343The district court’s dismissal of Burden’s complaint for failure to state a claim counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir.1996); *see also Patton v. Jefferson Correctional Center,*136 F.3d 458, 463-64 (5th Cir.1998). Burden has already accumulated two strikes under § 1915(g). *See Burden v. Unidentified Party,*No. 05-40781, 2006 WL 2277900 (5th Cir. Aug. 7, 2006) (dismissing as frivolous an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his § 1983 complaint as frivolous and failing to state a claim). Burden is advised that he has now accumulated at least three strikes and that he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

AFFIRMED; SANCTION IMPOSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-408-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 8, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 4, 2001, East Tennessee Natural Gas Company 
(East Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to be 
effective June 4, 2001:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 101
Third Revised Sheet No. 177

    East Tennessee states that the purpose of this filing is to amend 
its tariff, as suggested by the Commission in its April 12, 2001, Order 
Denying Clarification and Rehearing in Docket No. CP95-218-004, to 
include a generic waiver of the ``shipper must have title'' rule and a 
general statement that it will only transport for others on off-system 
capacity pursuant to its existing tariff and rates.
    East Tennessee states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11984 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2005249EN.01003801.xml

| 7.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/38

---

OPINION No 7/2005

OPINION N

on a draft Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 as regards the post of accounting officers of executive agencies

(2005/C 249/01)

THE COURT OF AUDITORS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 248(4) thereof,

Having regard to the request by the Commission’s Director-General for Budget (1) of an opinion on a draft Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 as regards the posts of accounting officers of executive agencies,

1

Whereas Article 30 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 on a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies (2) provides that the management board of an executive agency shall appoint an accounting officer, who is an official subject to the Staff Regulations,

2

Whereas, having encountered problems in finding among officials appropriate candidates to be seconded to the posts of accounting officers of executive agencies, the Commission proposes to amend Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004, so as to allow the appointment of members of temporary staff as accounting officers of executive agencies,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING OPINION:

The Court has no observations on the proposal of the Commission. The Court invites, however, the Commission to consider including in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 the qualifications required for an accounting officer, as in Article 55 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation (3).

3

This Opinion was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 6 July 2005.

For the Court of Auditors

Hubert WEBER

President

---

(1)  Letter of 1 June 2005 to the President of the Court of Auditors.

1

(2)  OJ L 297, 22.9.2004, p. 6.

2

(3)  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1.

3

---
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 8 of 8
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP. 

A LOUISIANA CORPORATION 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION 

 

I, James C. Eckert, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OMNI Energy Services Corp., a Louisiana corporation (the “registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I, are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 15,2005