alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 21, 2006

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581
Reference File #2703.01
Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Revision to the permissible hours for transitory Exchange for Physicals (EFP)
transactions in CBOT 100 oz. Gold and 5,000 oz. Silver contracts as indicated in the
attached Notice.

Under the referenced revision, these transitory EFP transactions may be executed without
Testriction as to time of day.

As indicated in the Notice, the CBOT intends to implement this revision as of July 24, 2006.
There were no opposing views concerning this revision.

The CBOT certifies that this revision complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b071806


July 21, 2006

NOTICE

Transitory Exchange for Physical Transactions
in 100 0z. Gold and 5,000 oz. Silver Futures

Expansion of Trading Hours Effective July 24, 2006

The CBOT® has determined to expand the hours during which transitory Exchange for Physical
Transactions (EFPs) in the CBOT’s 100 oz. Gold and 5,000 oz. Silver futures may be executed.

The CBOT presently permits transitory EFPs in these products only during the hours of 12:25
p.m. to 7:30 a.m. (Central time). Effective July 24, 2006, transitory EFPs may be executed in
100 oz. Gold and 5,000 oz. Silver futures without restriction as to the time of day, subject to the
following requirements:

1. The seller of the futures contract must simultaneously purchase the cash commodity and
the buyer of the futures contract must simultaneously sell the cash commodity.

2. All documents typically generated in accordance with cash market conventions must be
generated and retained.

3. The execution time of the EFP must be recorded both on the EFP order ticket and, upon
submission of the EFP for clearing, on the PNT entry screen

All other CBOT and CFTC requirements regarding EFP transactions must also be adhered to
in connection with these transactions.

Questions regarding this notice may be directed to Sandra Valtierra (312 -341-4137) or
William Lange (312-341-7757) of the Office of Investigations and Audits.

Paul J. Draths
Vice President & Secretary
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Ronald D. Mogel, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 7, 2008



/s/ Ronald D. MogelRonald D. MogelSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




35
144 So. 915

#### R. L. BENDALL v. Bertie C. TERRY.

6 Div. 83.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 1, 1932.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, of INVESTools Inc.(the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee K. Barba, certify that, to the best of myknowledge, the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and that the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934.

 
|   | /s/ Lee K.  Barba        |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Lee K. Barba             |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | March 29,  2004          |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 M arch 23, 2020

Order 

Clerk

March 23, 2020

159524-5(59)

LAKESHORE GROUP, CHARLES ZOLPER,

JANE UNDERWOOD, LUCIE HOYT, and

WILLIAM REININGA,

Petitioners-Appellants,

and

KENNETH ALTMAN, DAWN SCHUMANN,

GEORGE SCHUMANN, MARJORIE

SCHUHAM, and LAKESHORE CAMPING,

Intervenors-Appellants,

SC: 159524; 159525

v COA: 340623; 340647

Ingham CC: 17-000176-AA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY and DUNE RIDGE SA, LP,

Respondents-Appellees. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of Environmental Organizations to file a 

brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on March 20, 2020, is 

accepted for filing.
# C_2009266EN.01001001.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/10

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 266/06

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Limoges (Bellegarde)–Paris (Orly) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | The day after the publication of the present notice in the Official Journal of the European Union |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Arrêté du 13 octobre 2009 relatif à la modification des obligations de service public imposées sur les services aériens réguliers entre Limoges et Paris (Orly)
  NOR: DEVA0915912A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechText





  Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tél. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Concerned route

Limoges (Bellegarde)–Paris (Orly)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

The day after the publication of the present notice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Arrêté du 13 octobre 2009 relatif à la modification des obligations de service public imposées sur les services aériens réguliers entre Limoges et Paris (Orly)

NOR: DEVA0915912A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechText

Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tél. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001045560
<NAME> PRT GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      17,314,000
<SECURITIES>                                   152,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,062,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   472,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,496,000
<PP&E>                                      15,012,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,244,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,883,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,363,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,862,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,883,000
<SALES>                                     41,521,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,521,000
<CGS>                                       31,847,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,847,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,292,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               140,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             328,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,376,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (975,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,401,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,401,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)
        

</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 

#           Field Guides for Commonly Used Analog sites in Northern Arizona      

      By Astrogeology Science Center

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Maps 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  Software 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

The Astrogeology Science Center TARGET program is actively developing field guides for commonly used analogs in Northern Arizona.

##### SP Crater

                            - SP Crater Field Guide
                            - SP Crater - Virtual Field Guide

##### Verde Valley

                            - Verde Valley - Virtual Field Guide

##### Cinder Lake Crater Field

(Coming soon)

##### San Francisco Volcanic Field

(Coming soon)

 

### Study Area
May 1, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2669.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of May and September 2008 Corn and mini-sized Corn futures.
These futures contracts ordinarily would be authorized for trading in September 2006 and March
2007 respectively. Due to customer demand, the Exchange intends to list these contracts earlier
than usual (i.e., as of May 2, 2006).
This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.

There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01698-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40139

Conference Calendar

 

ROBERT LAMARR ALLEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KARL BROWN, Sergeant, Coffield Unit 

Individually and in official capacity; ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:97-CV-930

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Lamarr Allen, Texas state prisoner # 636644, is

BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because, on at

least three prior occasions while incarcerated, Allen has brought

an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was

dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which

relief could be granted. See Allen v. Price, No. 96-40697 (5th

Cir. Nov. 7, 1996) (unpublished; affirmance by this court of the 
No. 98-40139

-2-

district court’s dismissal of Allen’s civil rights complaint as

frivolous; counts as one strike); Allen v. Price, No. 95-40984

(5th Cir. June 26, 1996) (unpublished; affirmance by this court

of the district court’s dismissal of Allen’s civil rights

complaint as frivolous; counts as second strike); Allen v.

Klevenhagen, No. 95-20271 (5th Cir. Oct. 17, 1995) (unpublished;

affirmance by this court of the district court’s dismissal of

Allen’s civil rights complaint as frivolous; counts as third

strike); see Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir.

1996).

Accordingly, Allen’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he may

not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED. 

Allen has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the

full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district

court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal. 

IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7093
ANDRE SYLVESTER WATTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden; RODNEY MYERS, Unit Manager of Building I; MS. WILLIS, Case Manager; STRICKLAND, Assistant Warden; KIM WHITE, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00269-gec) Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Sylvester Watts, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). - 2 - PER CURIAMAndre Sylvester Watts appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his Bivens * complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). Because Watts did not fully exhaust his administrative remedies, we find no error in the court’s dismissal of the action without prejudice. Id. Nor did the district court abuse its discretion in denying Watts’ Rule 59(e) motion. See Pacific Ins. Co. v. American Nat’l Fire Ins. Co. , 148 F.3d 396, 402 (4th Cir. 1998) (providing standard). We therefore affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
cme ¢é

We SECHETARIA, Chicago Mercantile Exchange
20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax

www.cme.com

October 28, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Section 5c(c)(1), Regulation 40.6(a) Submission. Self-Certification for
Composition of CME X-Fund Index Futures contracts.
CME Submission #05-111

Dear Ms. Webb:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. hereby informs the Commission regarding the composition for
the October 31, 2005 — November 10, 2005 CME X-Fund Index Futures contracts.

The Exchange certifies that the CME X-Funds product complies with the Act & regulations
thereunder.

CME X-Fund 1 (XI)

Short Dec 05 Wheat
Long Dec 05 5-Year Note
Long Dec 05 Australian Dollar
Short Dec 05 Canadian

CME X-Fund 2 (X2)

Short Mar 06 Wheat
Short Jan 06 Soybeans
Short Dec 05 Canadian Dollar
Long Dec 05 Australian Dollar



If you require any additional information regarding this action, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Charles Piszczor at 312-930-4536 or via e-mail at cpiszcezo@cme.com. We would be
appreciative if you could reference our CME Submission #05-111 in any related correspondence.

Sincerely,

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development
#### People v Elbert Bryant, Also Known as Filbert Bryant.

Motion to extend time to take appeal denied as untimely *(see,*CPL 460.30 [1]). Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 34 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 34 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 51 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 51 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 51 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Don Crosbie, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CLAIMSNET.COM INC.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) [Reserved]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: April 20, 2006/s/ Don Crosbie
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0003 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0003

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (16182/2/2003 — C6-0112/2004 — 2002/0124(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 247 E , 06/10/2005 P. 0078 - 0088 *

P6_TA(2005)0003

Civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (16182/2/2003 — C6-0112/2004 — 2002/0124(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (16182/2/2003 — C6-0112/2004),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2002)0244) [2],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A6-0073/2004),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 82 E, 1.4.2004, p. 297.

[2] OJ C 227 E, 24.9.2002, p. 387.

--------------------------------------------------