alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DOCSNY-266241v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

BOGUSLAW KWASNIAK AND 

MALGORZATA KWASNIAK, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

100 CHURCH, LLC et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05300-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). To the extent that the Check-Off Complaint in this action alleges a relationship 

between 100 Church Street and Merrill Lynch, Merrill Lynch avers that it never reoccupied the 

Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-266241v01 

building at this location after September 11, 2001 and that it terminated all lease arrangements 

covering this location effective May 8, 2003. 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 17, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40151

Conference Calendar

HARRY LEE RIDDICK,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD D. MILES, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CV-295

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Harry Lee Riddick, federal prisoner # 48116-060, appeals

from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Riddick

challenges his conviction of operating a continuing criminal

enterprise, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

cocaine, distribution of cocaine in or near a school, and

distribution of cocaine.

Riddick seeks relief pursuant to United States v. Booker,

543 U.S. 220 (2005); Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004);

and Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813 (1999). Riddick’s
No. 06-40151

-2-

Booker and Blakely claims do not fall under the “savings clause”

of 28 U.S.C. § 2255; he thus may not pursue relief under § 2241. 

See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Riddick’s appellate brief indicates that he knew about Richardson

before he filed his § 2255 motion in 2001; he therefore could

have raised his Richardson issues in that motion and may not

pursue them in a § 2241 petition. See Reyes-Requena v. United

States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at April 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended April
30, 1999 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         731,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,843,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,969,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,591,000
<PP&E>                                      66,937,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              33,586,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,916,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,911,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,662,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,916,000
<SALES>                                     37,841,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             37,841,00
<CGS>                                       11,661,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,249,000<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,834,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   564,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,270,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,270,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<FN>
<F1>Provision for doubtful accounts and inventory provision included in total
costs.
</FN>


</TABLE>
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

JESSE DRAKE (AND WIFE SUSAN DRAKE) 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 5353 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial 

Properties, Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., Brookfield Properties One 

WFC Co. LLC f/k/a WFP Tower A Co. L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC G.P. 

Corp. f/k/a WFP Tower A Co. GP Corp., WFP Tower B Co. L.P., WFP Tower B 

Co. GP Corp., BFP TowerC Co. LLC, BFP Tower C MM LLC, WFP Tower D Co. 

L.P., WFP Tower D Co. GP Corp. and WFP Retail Co. L.P. (collectively the 

"Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint 

filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' Answer to 

Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re 

~orld Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 46 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the 

above captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and 

disbursements. 

Dated:New York, New York 

January 31 2008 

Faust, ,Schenker & Blee, LLP 

By: /Williatn J. Smith B~a~J~9L37) 

Att eys br the Brookfield Parties 

Two~ec~dr street, 20" Fl~o~ 

New York, NY 10006 

(212)363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 46 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO CONTINUE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
            BETWEEN KENNETH R. GOOD ("EXECUTIVE") AND
   POGO PRODUCING COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ("COMPANY"),
                DATED EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1, 1998

          WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an
"Employment Agreement" bearing an original "Effective Date" of
February 1, 1996; and

          WHEREAS, February 1, 1998, (even date herewith) is
hereby deemed to be the "Renewal Date" in that Employment
Agreement; and

          WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said
Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as to
terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit
January 31, 2000); and

          WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of
Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and
desires to induce Executive to remain in its employ for that
extended time period; and

          WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as
an employee of Company for the period specified herein from and
after the date of this Extension Agreement; ad

          WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to enter into
this Extension Agreement in order to formally secure for Company
the benefit of the experience and abilities of Executive, and to
set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and
Executive; and
<PAGE>

          WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution
and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been
duly authorized and approved by all requisite corporate action on
the part of the Company.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and
the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, and in
consideration of the sum of $10 paid by Company to Executive,
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive
and Company do hereby agree as follows:

          1.   The Employment Agreement between Executive and
Company bearing an "Effective Date" of February 1, 1996 and a
"Renewal Date" which is deemed herein to be February 1, 1998,  is
hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing
February 1, 1998 and ending January 31, 2000, unless such employ
ment period is hereafter further extended for an additional
period by both Executive and Company.

          2. All provisions of the Employment Agreement between
Executive and Company dated as of February 1, 1996, and as it is
herein amended,  are continued in full force and effect without
change as if the Employment Agreement had been initially
effective as of February 1, 1998.

                              POGO PRODUCING COMPANY

                              By: /s/   JOHN O. MCCOY, JR.
                              -----------------------------
                                   Senior Vice President and
                                   Chief Administrative Officer

ATTEST:

/s/  JOE ANN KINGDON

----------------------------
Assistant Corporate Secretary

                              EMPLOYEE:

                              /s/  KENNETH R. GOOD

                              ----------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's December 31, 1997 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
refence to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                     0000276189
<NAME>                   Fairfield Communities, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                           3074
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  312057
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20848
<INVENTORY>                                     93139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          42325
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 463932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                        170081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          495
<OTHER-SE>                                     186687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   463932
<SALES>                                        284378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               309064
<CGS>                                           93791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111857
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12121
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43099
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19727
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23372
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2195
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21177
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .46
        

</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth: Topics      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. 

Return to Eyes on Earth Homepage

The Eyes on Earth Podcast is typically released twice a month, featuring Earth observation and remote sensing topics. Feel free to dive into the topic of your interest and more!

 

## Search by Topic

Agriculture

## Agriculture

Cities

## Cities

Data

## Data

Ecosystems

## Ecosystems

EROS

## EROS

Fires

## Fires

Forests

## Forests

History

## History

Land Change

## Land Change

Landsat

## Landsat

Natural Disasters

## Natural Disasters

Remote Sensing

## Remote Sensing

Water

## Water
Green & Willstatter

Attorneys at Law

200 Mamaroneck Avenue

Suite 403

White Plains, New York 10601

_______

Theodore S. Green (914) 948-5656

Richard D. Willstatter FAX (914) 948-8730 e-mail: willstatter@msn.com

September 26, 2007

Hon. Stephen C. Robinson

United States District Court

300 Quarropas Street

White Plains, NY 10601

Re: United States v. Charles Ernest Dewar

07 Cr. 552 (SCR)

06 Cr. 311 (SCR)

Dear Judge Robinson:

My law firm is moving to a different suite in the same building. As of October 1,

2007, our new address will be:

Green & Willstatter – Attorneys at Law

200 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 605

White Plains, New York 10601

Our telephones and email addresses will remain the same. Thank you for your

kind attention.

Very truly yours,

RICHARD D. WILLSTATTER

Case 7:07-cr-00552-SCR Document 11 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leslie A. Bauer, Appellant.

Kane, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Cortland County (Dowd, J.), rendered March 28, 1988, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of conspiracy in the second degree.

In accordance with the provisions of a plea bargain agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to the second count of a two-count indictment in full satisfaction of the charges against her with the understanding that she would receive an indeterminate sentence with a maximum of nine years and a minimum of three years in prison. As part of the agreement, she also waived her right to appeal from her conviction.

On this appeal, defendant asserts that her waiver of the right to appeal was not knowingly and voluntarily made and that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. The record demonstrates, however, that defendant’s waiver of her right to appeal, made in the presence of her counsel in open court, was entirely voluntary and with full knowledge of the consequences thereof *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). An inquiry by her related to the waiver of appeal was explained and thereafter she responded affirmatively to County Court’s inquiry regarding whether her questions had been answered *(see, People v Smith,*141 AD2d 988). Finally, we find no merit in the other issues raised by defendant. We note that the sentence received was in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain and, since there is nothing to indicate that the plea agreement was unfair or inappropriate, it should not be disturbed *(see, People v Francis,*38 NY2d 150, 156).

Appeal dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF 10-Q REPORT OF




KL
Energy Corporation





FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009







The
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an acting officer of KL Energy
Corporation (“KL”), that to his knowledge:





1.
            This
      Form 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      KL.





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the 10-Q Report. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to KL and will be retained by KL and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
Certification is executed as of May 15, 2009.








/s/ THOMAS J.
BOLAN


Thomas J.
Bolan


Acting
Chief Financial Officer
Clear All

        29 July 2022    

                    CNAL attends “SUPER-16” JROTC Flight Academy Graduation at ECSU                  
                Rear Adm. John F. Meier, Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic (CNAL), attended the graduation of Junior ROTC Flight Academy cadets at Elizabeth City State University (ECSU), Elizabeth City, North Carolina, July 28.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 32.2

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for
the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
year ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Teresa M. Nilsen                     
|Teresa M. Nilsen, Chief Financial
Officer
|Hennessy Advisors, Inc.                  
|                                         
|Date: December 8, 2006
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH     Document 16      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Columbia Environmental Research Center 

#           CERC History      

      By Columbia Environmental Research Center

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 

The Center was established in 1959 at the Denver Wildlife Research Center of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and was called the Fish Pesticide Research Laboratory (FPRL).

View Media Details

 

The Center was established in 1959 at the Denver Wildlife Research Center of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and was called the Fish Pesticide Research Laboratory (FPRL). In 1966, the University of Missouri deeded 33 acres to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the FPRL moved to its present location. The Center was incorporated into the USGS in 1996.Over its history in Columbia, MO, the Columbia Environmental Research Center (CERC) has addressed contaminant research in support of natural resource management of our nation's aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. As the Center grew, the scope of its research programs broadened to an integrated approach to address more complex resource problems. These complexities encompass several factors associated with the biological significance of degraded water quality that often includes physical landscape alterations, invasive and endangered species, and ecosystem restoration activities. Today CERC conducts environmental research in support of the Department of the Interior agencies, but also works with other federal government agencies, state, tribal, private, and non-governmental organizations, both national and international, to meet common needs and goals.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with this Annual Report of Pogo Producing Company (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I,Paul G. Van Wagenen, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|        |   | /s/ PAUL G. VAN WAGENEN                         |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Paul G. Van Wagenen                             |   |   |
|   |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

** **

March 1,2007

 

 

----