alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[FIRST BUSINESS CAPITAL
CORP. LETTERHEAD] 



REPAYMENT AGREEMENT 



        1.                 This
Repayment Agreement is made between First Business Capital Corp. (herein           called
FBCC) and Charles H. Batson (herein called Executive).  




        2.                 Executive
is being employed by FBCC as an executive, and will be paid a signing           bonus of
$150,000, all as described in the letter from Corey Chambas dated           December 12,
2005, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement for reference           purposes
only. The signing bonus is being paid in further consideration of such
          employment.  




        3.                 Executive
agrees that if Executive resigns or is terminated for cause at any           time before
the end of December 31, 2006, Executive will repay the entire           signing bonus
paid to Executive. If Executive should terminate due to death or           disability,
Executive will not be required to repay any of the signing bonus           that has been
paid to Executive.  




        4.                 Executive’s
obligation to repay such signing bonus shall not be subject to           any setoff for
moneys or damages due or claimed to be due, to Executive,           including any claim
for moneys or damages based on a claim that FBCC or any           agent of FBCC has
breached any agreement with Executive, or failed to fulfill           any promise made to
Executive. Executive agrees to pay all costs associated with           instituting any
type of collection action, including reasonable attorneys’          fees.  




        This
Repayment Agreement is entered into by the parties on the dates shown below. 



		First Business Capital Corp.
	
 	By:  /s/ Corey Chambas
		        Corey Chambas
	
 	Dated:  12/14/05
	

 	/s/ Charles H. Batson
		        Charles H. Batson
	
 	Dated:  12/14/05
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF, AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
INCLUDED IN REGISTRANT'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                       304
<INVENTORY>                                     11,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,308
<PP&E>                                           7,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,576
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,618
<SALES>                                         47,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,685
<CGS>                                           32,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (108)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (439)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       303
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 6/3/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD DEE THOMAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

GEORGE VAUGHN, DON BELL, RAY

DALLING, and RON HUNT,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-4187

(D.C. No. 93-CV-925-B)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Thomas, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the dismissal of

his civil rights complaint. When he filed his complaint, Mr. Thomas also sought service

of process and appointment of counsel. Almost two years later, the district court issued

an order to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In

the meantime, it appears that Mr. Thomas had changed correctional facilities and did not
- 2 -

respond to the show cause order. The district court dismissed the action pursuant to a

local rule which allows for dismissal when a timely showing of good cause is not made. 

D. Utah R. 115; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Given that Mr. Thomas had filed his complaint and two motions, it appears that the

next move to advance the case belonged to the district court. Although we review a

dismissal for failure to prosecute under an abuse of discretion standard, given the

circumstances we feel that the judicial process would be better served by a disposition on

the merits. See DeBardeleben v. Quinlan, 937 F.2d 502, 504-05 (10th Cir. 1991). 

REVERSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
#### Erick Eduardo VEGA-MUNOZ, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-60386

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 2013.

Brian S. Munnelly, Omaha, NE, for Petitioner.

Donald Anthony Couvillon, Esq., Tan-gerlia Cox, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Erick Eduardo Vega-Munoz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of the immigration judge (IJ) denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). *353Vega-Munoz’s sole argument on appeal is that this court should reconsider the reasoning of its recent decision in *Orellana-Monson v. Holder,*685 F.8d 511 (5th Cir.2012), in which the court deferred to the BIA’s “social visibility” and “particularity” requirements for establishing membership in a “particular social group” for purposes of asylum.

In *Orellana-Monson,*685 F.3d at 515-16, Jose Orellana-Monson sought asylum, like Vega-Munoz, based on his membership in a particular social group, namely, a group of Salvadoran males between the ages of 8 and 15 who had refused to join a pervasive street gang due to a principled opposition to gangs. This court upheld the BIA’s application of the “particularity’ and “social visibility” test in defining what constitutes a “particular social group,” finding it “a reasoned interpretation ... entitled to deference.” *Id.*at 521. Because Orel-lana-Monson’s proposed group lacked particularity and social visibility, this court upheld the BIA’s decision that the proposed group did not meet the requirements of a “particular social group” for asylum purposes. *Id.*at 522.

“[I]n the absence of intervening Supreme Court precedent,” one panel cannot overrule another panel even if it disagrees with the prior panel’s holding. *Montesano v. Seafirst Commercial Corp.,*818 F.2d 423, 426 (5th Cir.1987). As such, contrary to Vega-Munoz’s assertion, the BIA did not err in requiring “particularity” and “social visibility” to establish that Vega-Munoz was a member of a “particular social group.”

Accordingly, Vega-Munoz’s petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under die limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Clear All

        23 December 2020    

                    Naval Aviation and Aircraft Carrier Medical Staffs to Receive First Dosage of the COVID-19 Vaccination                 
                Medical personnel from a variety of Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic (CNAL) commands will receive the first coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (NMCP) Immunization Clinic, in Portsmouth, and at Navy Branch Health Clinic, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Building Materials Holding
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert E. Mellor, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.



/s/ Robert E. Mellor
---------------------
Robert E. Mellor
Chairman of the Board
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 9, 2002






                                       20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ON PAGES 28-30
OF THE COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                          88,238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,886,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,432
<INVENTORY>                                    272,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,478,415
<PP&E>                                      12,197,086
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,454,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,115,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,368,854
<BONDS>                                      1,159,126
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,864,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,115,975
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,979,277
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,107,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                770,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   312,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   458,566
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00377-CV

KIP H. ALLISON

v.

WORLDVENTURES MARKETING, LLC d/b/a WORLDVENTURES AND 

WORLDVENTURES HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a WORLDVENTURES

On appeal from the

160th District Court of Dallas County, Texas

Trial Cause No. DC-11-09451

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 5, 2013.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 18

- 653

_____________________________

B RENDA M. B USH ,
Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Wakulla County

. James O. Shelfer , Judge

.
April 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.

I n this Anders ∗ appeal, we affirm Brenda M. Bush’s convictions and sentences . But we remand with instructions that the trial court enter a written order finding Bush competent to proceed, nunc pro tunc to the date the trial court made its oral determination of competency. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.212(b) (“If the court finds the de fendant competent to proceed, the court shall enter its order so finding and shall proceed.”) ; Mullens v. State , 197 So. 3d 16, 37

- 38 (Fla. 2016).

A FFIRMED and R EMANDED with instructions

.

∗ Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)2 R OWE , J AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________ ________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahasse e , for Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

TYRONE JONES, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 13 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED limited to the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition 

against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme 

Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). As a result of 

the recent holding that Miller must be applied retroactively by the States, Montgomery v. 

Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016), the Superior Court’s order is VACATED IN PART. 

The case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings 

consistent with Montgomery. Allowance of appeal is DENIED in all other respects. 

 To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction 

petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending 
[13 EAL 2016] - 2 

to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States 

which it deems to be retroactive. 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(iii).
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1703 

For the relief of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2019 

Mr. PERLMUTTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ARTURO 

4 HERNANDEZ-GARCIA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Arturo Hernandez-Garcia shall be eligible for issu8 ance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to 

9 that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant 

11 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 

12 status to lawful permanent resident. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1703 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Arturo Her2 nandez-Garcia enters the United States before the filing 

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other5 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 

6 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Arturo Hernandez-Garcia, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1703 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia 

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Flooding in the Lake Chad Basin      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

The Lake Chad Basin covers 2.4 million square kilometers, eight countries and nearly 8 percent of the African continent’s landmass.

View Media Details

Given its position in developing nations, the water that moves through the basin’s river systems after the rainy season has an out-sized impact on the human beings who live there.

In some seasons, there isn’t enough water to go around. This season, the impact came in the form of too much water.

Flooding across the basin from heavier-than-average rainfall in the fall of 2019 is just one of the factors expected to intensify the need for food aid for the region well into 2020, according to a report from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Some 9.9 million people across the basin are likely to need humanitarian assistance this year.

At least 220,000 people had been affected by flooding across the basin as of late November, and northern Cameroon and northeast Nigeria (yellow inset) were hit particularly hard. According to data from the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), the areas just upstream from those flood zones saw between two and six inches more rainfall than average in the month of October. Those rains followed above-average rainfall from May through September.

 

Show only leftShow only right

View Media Details

Download Images

 

Show only leftShow only right

View Media Details

Download Images

Data from FEWS NET, collected and distributed through the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, help inform decisions on food aid across the developing world. Landsat data, archived by EROS and available at no cost to the user, can be used to support myriad applications. Find and download Landsat data at EarthExplorer.usgs.gov.

### Contacts