alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 40 – Landsat Collection 2      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn how a Collections strategy boosts the value of the Landsat archive.

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: Landsat data is more useful today than at any other point in its nearly 50-year history. The USGS Collections strategy is a major reason why. Landsat Collections align and correct satellite acquisitions from 1972 through the present to make the data easier to work with through time. The USGS has now released Collection 2, an upgrade that improves geometric accuracy, improves interoperability with other satellite data sources, eases access to Landsat Level-2 science products, and makes Landsat data available in a cloud-friendly format for the first time. On this episode, we hear about what life was like for Landsat users before Collections, what it’s like now, and how Collection 2 will open doors for more innovative, expansive research.

**Guest**:  Dr. Chris Barnes, USGS contractor for the Landsat International Cooperator Network; Dr. Chris Barber, USGS research physical scientist with Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP)

**Host**: John Hult

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: December 14, 2020

**More on Landsat Collection 2**: 
                            - Every Pixel in its Place: How Collections Unlock the Potential of the Landsat Archive
                            - EROS Releases Collection 2, Boosting Cloud Access, Accuracy, Value of Landsat Archive
                            - Landsat Collection 2 product information pages

### Contacts
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Peterkin, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered January 2, 1986, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to object to the jury charge on the defense of justification as well as to the propriety of the prosecutor’s remarks on summation and, accordingly, has not preserved these matters for appellate review. In any event, we find that the court’s charge as to the defense of justification was proper and that the summation was not so egregious so as to rise to the level of a due process violation *(see, People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105; *People v Garcia,*52 NY2d 716).

Further, we note that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to substitute assigned counsel when the defendant failed to voice his dissatisfaction until the eve of trial and then only asserted vague and conclusory complaints. We note that counsel represented the defendant throughout the *Huntley-Wade*hearings and plea negotiations without complaint by the defendant. While the trial court is under a continuing duty to carefully evaluate complaints about assigned counsel to assure that the defendant is receiving effective assistance of counsel, the defendant herein failed to show good cause to justify substitution of counsel *(see, People v Medina,*44 NY2d 199). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Federal Express Corporation ("FedEx
Express") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cathy
D. Ross, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FedEx Express,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of FedEx Express.


Date:  July 16, 2004


/s/ Cathy D. Ross
-----------------
Cathy D. Ross
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  about 

#           Documents      

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

This is a collection of supporting documents to include instructions, training materials, technical memos, flowcharts, analytical references, and more. 

Official USGS Publications

**File icon

December 8, 2023

####   Employment Opportunities at USGS (updated 2023)

**File icon

December 8, 2023

####   Internship Opportunities at USGS (updated 2023)

**File icon

December 8, 2023

####   USGS Pathways Programs 2023

**File icon

December 8, 2023

####   USGS DEIA Strategic Plan 2023-2028

**File icon

December 7, 2023

####   Su döngüsü (Poster, PDF) - The Water Cycle, Turkish (Poster, PDF)

**File icon

December 1, 2023

####   December Seminar Series

**File icon

December 1, 2023

####   KSWSC 2023 October Quarterly Newsletter

**File icon

November 7, 2023

####   Elevation-Derived Hydrography READ Rules 2022 rev. A

**File icon

October 27, 2023

####   EROS 50th Anniversary poster

**File icon

October 17, 2023

####   WHISPers User Guide: Administrator Dashboard

**File icon

September 29, 2023

####   Update for the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies from the USGS National Wildlife Health Center

**File icon

September 27, 2023

####   TM23-02 Discontinuation of surrogate compound tetrahydrofuran-d8 and addition of surrogate compound 1,3-dioxane to National Water Quality Laboratory schedules 4437 and 4447 that use Method O-4437-16

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
-                Page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Current page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
-                Page            6 
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Page            9 
- ...
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
#### Michael A. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH; Kenneth W. Stolle; Paul J. Lanteigne; F.V. Williams; Sylvester Williams; John Newton; Cassandra Lee; Steve Wilke; J. Manigo; John Doe; Marc F. Schuster; Victoria Thomson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-2578.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 19, 2013.

Decided: May 2, 2013.

Michael A Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Beverly, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Virginia Beach, Virginia; David Brandt Oakley, POOLE MAHONEY PC, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Scott appeals the district court orders and judgment granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss, denying his motion to amend the complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Scott v. City of Virginia Beach,*No. 2:10-cv-00625-RAJDEM (E.D.Va., Sept. 29, 2011; April 4, 2012; Nov. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Pickering --r\ . , J.

Parraguirre dismiss, AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.'

Saitta PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC u. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.
cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Law Offices of Noggle Law PLLC Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

'The injunction imposed by our July 22, 2014, order is vacated.

SUPREME COUFtT OF NEVADA 2 (0) [947A en
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11370]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Michigan Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Michigan Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9 
a.m. and adjourn at 1 p.m. on Thursday, May 17, 2001, at the Holiday 
Inn Fairlane-Dearborn, 5801 Southfield Service Drive, Detroit, Michigan 
48228. The purpose of the meeting is to hold a press conference to 
release the Committee's report, Civil Rights Issues Facing Arab 
Americans in Michigan. Also, the Committee will discuss current events 
and plan future activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Constance M. Davis, Director of the 
Midwestern Regional Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, May 1, 2001.
Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-11370 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2015

No. 04-15-00301-CR

IN RE Israel LARA Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On May 13, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court has 

determined that we do not have jurisdiction to consider relator’s petition. The petition is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on May 27, 2015.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk 

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11-1327-CR, styled The State of Texas v. Israel Lara, pending in the 25th 

Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Dwight E. Peschel presiding.
Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 19 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 19 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 37-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 17
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

_________________x 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER
 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH)
 

_________________x 

FREDDY CONFORME 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

v.	 PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

160 WATER ST., INC., ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 5552 

__________________x 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower B Co. L.P. and WFP Tower B 

Co. GP Corp., (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the 

Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield 

Parties' Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the 

matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 

102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 25 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

February 2008 

Faust, Goet , Schenker & Blee, LLP 

Iu 

Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 25 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

JOSE NICOLA, 07-CV-5372 (AKH)

Plaintiff, NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY

BLUE MILLENNIUM

-against- REALTY LLC OF ANSWER

TO MASTER COMPLAINT

80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC

(hereinafter Blue Millennium), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the

above-referenced action, herein adopt Blue Millenniums Answer to Master Complaint, dated

August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, Blue Millennium demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: New York, New York

September 11, 2007

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

BLUE MILLEITh4IUM REALTY LLC

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 687-0100

Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintfs

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

All Other Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the following

document to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of Blue Millenniums Adoption of Answer to Master Complaint.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq. James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

115 Broadway, 12th Floor Patton Boggs LLP

New York, New York 10006 One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. Thomas Egan, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

New York, New York 10279 One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintjffs

Dated: September 11, 2007

Is

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

ADAM E. JACOVINO,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50128

D.C. No. 3:11-cr-01731-BEN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. 

Adam E. Jacovino appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 12-month sentence imposed upon his fourth revocation of supervised release. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 31 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Citing the district court’s statement during a prior revocation hearing that

any future violation of supervised release would result in a 12-month custodial

sentence, Jacovino argues the district court should have granted his motion for

recusal. We review the district court’s denial of a recusal motion for abuse of

discretion. See United States v. McTiernan, 695 F.3d 882, 891 (9th Cir. 2012). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Jacovino’s motion because

the motion was unsupported by evidence that would cause “a reasonable person

with knowledge of all the facts” to question the judge’s impartiality. See id.

(internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Rangel, 697 F.3d 795,

804 (9th Cir. 2012) (judge’s conduct during the course of the case does not provide

a basis for recusal “except in the rarest of circumstances” (internal quotation marks

omitted)).

Jacovino also contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors, instead basing the sentence

exclusively on the promise made to him by the court at the third revocation

hearing. Because Jacovino did not raise this objection before the district court, we

review for plain error. See United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103,

1108 (9th Cir. 2010). Contrary to Jacovino’s argument, the record reflects that the

district court considered the parties’ arguments and the statutory sentencing factors

2 16-50128
before imposing sentence. The court imposed sentence on the basis of Jacovino’s

breach of the court’s trust, a permissible sentencing factor. See United States v.

Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir. 2007) (at a revocation sentencing, the court

may sanction the violator for his breach of trust). 

AFFIRMED.

3 16-50128
Clear All

        13 February 2023    

                    NECC Recovery Care Management Program Critical to Expeditionary Multidisciplinary Care Team                 
                Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) continues to demonstrate its commitment to the care and resiliency of its members across the force, by focusing on mental health and other critical care areas. The force uses the Recovery Care Management (RCM) program, which provides assistance to injured and            

        21 December 2022    

                    USNS Comfort Completes 12th Iteration of Continuing Promise 2022                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - The hospital ship USNS Comfort (T-AH 20) returned to its homeport in Norfolk, Virginia, concluding Continuing Promise, Dec. 21, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

                    In                     **Federal Register**                     Document 01-10229 appearing on page 20820 in the issue for Wednesday, April 25, 2001, the location of the meeting scheduled on June 4, 2001, from 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. has changed. This meeting will be held at: Holiday Inn Select (Conference Plaza),130 Claremont Avenue,Decatur, Georgia 30030,Telephone: 800-225-6079.                

Dated: May 7, 2001.

Jane M. Harrison,

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.

[FR Doc. 01-11880 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the “
Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric W.
Thornburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   Eric W.
Thornburg


Eric W.
Thornburg


Chief
Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 2