alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23904-23905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP01-399-000, CP99-94-004 and RP96-366-014]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 4, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2001, Florida Gas Transmission Company 
(FGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of 
May 1, 2001:

Third Revised Sheet No. 56
Second Revised Sheet No. 67
Third Revised Sheet No. 541
Third Revised Sheet No. 542

    FGT states that on June 2, 1999, FGT filed a Stipulation and 
Agreement of Settlement (Settlement) in Docket Nos. CP99-94-000 and 
RP96-366-000, et al. resolving all non-environmental issues in its 
Phase IV Expansion proceeding. The Commission issued an order approving 
the Settlement on July 30, 1999.

[[Page 23905]]

    FGT states that in the Settlement, among other provisions, that it 
would file revised tariff sheets prior to the in-service date of the 
proposed Phase IV Expansion to provide that firm transportation service 
under FT's Rate Schedule FTS-2 will reflect seasonal entitlements for 
four seasons. Currently, FTS-2 service includes defined levels of 
seasonal Maximum Daily Transportation Quantities (MDTQ) for only two 
seasonal periods: (1) November through April and (2) May through 
October. In the Settlement, the parties agreed to change the two 
seasons to four seasons: (1) October, (2) November through March, (3) 
April, and (4) May through September. Increasing the seasons to four 
allows FTS-2 service agreements to have the same seasonal periods as 
service agreements for firm transportation service under FGT's Rate 
Schedule FTS-1.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11771 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
cme @

Chicago Mercantile Exchange
20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax

www.cme.com

June 6, 2006 o

Via Electronic Mail

Ms. Eileen Donovan oUNE DENTIAL TRER cis

Acting Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission REQUESTER
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: FOIA Confidentiality Treatment Request
Dear Ms. Donovan,

Pursuant to Regulation Section 145.9, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME” or
“Exchange”) hereby petitions the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) that the
attached Liquidity Provider Program for NYMEX Globex Contracts Submission be accepted and
retained in confidence by the Commission. The Exchange requests that the Liquidity Provider Program
for NYMEX Globex Contracts Submission be retained in confidence until further notice as against any
requestor who files with the Commission a request to inspect such information pursuant to the Freedom
of Information Act (“FOIA”).

The basis for this petition for confidential treatment is Regulation Section 145.9(d)(1)(ii), in that
such information contains trade secrets and confidential commercial information. 1 understand that this

petition will not be evaluated by the Commission unless and until an FOIA request has been filed for
inspection of this subject matter. In that event, please contact me at the phone number printed above.

Sincerely,
/S/ Matthew F. Kluchenek
Director and Associate General Counsel

cc: Ms. Riva Adriance
Ms. Gabrielle Sudik

enc.

Privileged and Confidential Information
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF L. LURIA & SON, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                           1,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     44,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,924
<PP&E>                                          45,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,152)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,930
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,859
<SALES>                                        121,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,566
<CGS>                                           94,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,930)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,271
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        4,386
<NET-INCOME>                                  (53,587)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (9.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending November 30, 2001 (the "Report"), I, Jay Lutsky, Principal Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Jay Lutsky



 Jay Lutsky,

 Principal Executive Officer and Director

May 28, 2004
**Exhibit 31(i).1**
 **Certification of the Principal Executive Officer**
 **Rule 13a - 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended**
 
 I, Shaun A. Burke, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) [Reserved - not effective]
 
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 15, 2005
 /s/ Shaun A. Burke
 Shaun A. Burke
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sinobiopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Xinjie Mu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








Dated: January 19, 2011
By:
/s/ Xinjie MuXinjie Mu

Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0157 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0157

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Croatia on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Croatia in Community programmes (5532/2005 - COM(2004)0809 - C6-0041/2005 - 2004/0278(AVC)) **

*
Official Journal 092 E , 20/04/2006 P. 0058 - 0058 *

P6_TA(2005)0157

EC-Croatia Framework Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Croatia on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Croatia in Community programmes (5532/2005 — COM(2004)0809 — C6-0041/2005 — 2004/0278(AVC))

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0809) [1],

- having regard to the text of the Council (5532/2005),

- having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Articles 13 and 308 of the EC Treaty (C6-0041/2005),

- having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6-0122/2005),

1. Gives its assent to the conclusion of the Framework Agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Republic of Croatia.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
January 12, 2006 8° 9. b8 boo SoU TARAL

Via E-Mail

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 06.10 — Notification of
Amendments to NYMEX Division Rule 9.27, Expiration and Current
Delivery Month Position Limits or Position Accountability.

Dear Ms. Jean Webb:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“NYMEX” or the “Exchange’”) hereby notifies
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) of amendments to NYMEX Division
Rule 9.27, Expiration and Current Delivery Month Position Limits or Position Accountability.

Effective January 17, 2006, the current spot month speculative position limit for the Two-
Year (RQ) and Three-Year (RR) NOX Forward Emissions Allowance futures contracts is
reduced from 200 to 125. Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”)
and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the new amendments comply with the
Act, including regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please feel free to contact me at
(212) 299-2897.

Very truly yours,

Thomas F. LaSala
Senior Vice President
Compliance and Risk Management

Attachments
cc: Brian Regan
Nancy Minett


Amendments to NYMEX Rule 9.27
(Strikethroughs in bold indicate deletions; underlining in bold indicate additions.)

NYMEX Rule 9.27, Expiration and Current Delivery Month Position Limits or Position
Accountability

(Paragraphs (A) and (B) I. Futures Contracts through One-Year Forward NOX Emissions
Allowance are unchanged.)

Futures Contracts
Net Futures or Futures-Equivalent

I, Futures Contracts Listed for Open Outcry Trading Expiration Position Limits
Two-Year Forward NOX Emissions Allowance 200 125 contracts
Three-Year Forward NOX Emissions Allowance 200 125 contracts

(Remainder of the Rule is unchanged)
EXHIBIT 31.2

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Arthur W. Budich, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
for the Registrant and we have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
> 
> b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
> as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
> 
> c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's
> ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
> 
> b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2003

---
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  M ARIEH ENSLEY , Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 02-1572



#  E ASTMAN -L ONGT ERM D ISABILITY P LAN , Defendant-Appellee. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-01-122-1) Submitted: November 27, 2002 Decided: December 23, 2002 Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELJohn M. Lamie, BROWNING, LAMIE, & GIFFORD, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Elizabeth S. Washko, OGLETREE,DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Marie Hensley appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). We affirm. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the district court. Ellis v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. , 126 F.3d 228, 232 (4th Cir. 1997). The denial of benefits under ERISA is reviewed de novo unless the plan gives the administrator or fiduciary discretionary authority to construe the terms of the plan or to determine whether a participant is eligible for benefits. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch , 489 U.S. 101, 111 (1989). If the plan confers discretionary authority, the decision isreviewed for an abuse of discretion, and the decision will not be disturbed if it is reasonable. Booth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 201 F.3d 335, 341-42 (4th Cir. 2000). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix and the district court’s opinion. We find that the district court’s opinion iswell-reasoned and agree that MetLife’s decision to deny Hensley benefits under the Plan was reasonable and well-supported by the medical documentation at the time of the review. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hensley v. Eastman-Long Term Disability Plan , No. CA-01-122-1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2002).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 H ENSLEY v. E ASTMAN -L ONGT ERM D ISABILITY
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




INTERCHANGE CORPORATION

Board of Directors Compensation Plan

Effective 1/1/05

Amended 10/14/05

Amended 12/20/05




	 	 	 
	Non-employee Director Compensation:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Annual retainer

	 	$20,000.00
	 
	 	 
	Board of Director’s meeting attended in person

	 	$1,500.00 per meeting
	 
	 	 
	Board of Director’s meeting attended telephonically

	 	$750.00 per meeting
	 
	 	 
	Audit Committee Chairman annual retainer

	 	$10,000.00
	 
	 	 
	Nominating, Compensation and Governance
Committee Chairmen annual retainer

	 	$7,500.00
	 
	 	 
	Lead Director annual retainer

	 	$12,500.00
	 
	 	 
	Committee meeting attended

	 	$1,200.00 per meeting
	 
	 	 
	Stock Option Grants (all Directors):
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Annual Grant

	 	15,000 shares
	 
	 	 
	Grant to new Director’s (first year)

	 	20,000 shares





New Directors will also receive a pro-rata amount of the Annual Grant.



Stock options vest 50% at the time of grant, and the remaining portions vest in equal amounts over
the next twelve months.
#### JOHN MORTON *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*Auden Grogins,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Julia K. Conlin,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 23, 2005

The petitioner John Morton’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 902 (AC 24574), is denied.