alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Coyote Hills Golf, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mitch Powers, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephanie Erickson, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Mitch S. Powers


Mitch Powers


Chief Executive Officer


November 12, 2010








/s/ Stephanie Lynn Erickson


Stephanie Lynn Erickson


Chief Financial Officer


November 12, 2010
# FCM DATA August 2007
HEDGE
Street

May 16, 2006

VIA EMAIL: sccretary@cftc.gov

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
3 Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

RE: Rule Certification: HedgeStreet Market Maker Subsidiary
Relocation and Hiring of New Employee

Dear Secretary Webb:

Pursuant to Section Sc(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (“Act”),
and §40.6(a) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (the “Commission”) under the Act, HedgeStreet, Inc. (“HedgeStreet”)
hereby notifies the Commission of the physical relocation of operations for
HedgeStreet’s Market Maker Subsidiary, Tower Three Capital, Inc. (“Market
Maker Subsidiary”) to the following new address location:

Tower Three Capital, Inc.

1730 South Amphlett Boulevard
Suite 220

San Mateo, CA 94402

In addition, the Market Maker Subsidiary has hired a full-time engineer to assist in
maintaining the operation of its internal trading system. Therefore, the Market
Maker Subsidiary now has a total of three (3) employees. Although this new
employee of the Market Maker Subsidiary has been hired as an engineer and not as
an authorized trader, he will still be required to abide by all of the same restrictions
and policies imposed on Authorized Traders of the Market Maker Subsidiary as
stipulated in the original HedgeStreet certification to the Commission dated January
5, 2006 regarding the same.

There were no substantive opposing views regarding the relocation for the Market
Maker Subsidiary.

1825 S. Grant Street
Suite 500
San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: 650.638.3500
www.hedgestreet.com 1 Fax: 650.638.3501


HEDGE
Street

HedgeStreet hereby certifies that this relocation for the Market Maker Subsidiary
complies with the Act, and the Commission Regulations adopted thereunder.

Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at

sford@hedgestreet.com or (650) 638-3511.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Ford
Vice President, Legal & Compliance

ce: Clarissa Manansala — HedgeStreet, Inc.
Riva Adriance — CFTC

1825 S. Grant Street

Suite 500

‘San Mateo, CA 94402

Tel: 650.638.3500
www-hedgestreet.com Fax: 650.638.3501
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 186: Automatic Dependent Surveillance--
Broadcast (ADS-B)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 186 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 186: Automatic Dependent 
Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B).

DATES: The meeting will be held June 4-7, 2001 starting at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Honeywell--Laguna South 
``Training Center,'' 14980 NE 31st Circle, Redmond, WA, 98052.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; web site http://www.rtca.org. (2) On-site Point of Contact: 
Pio Blankas, Redmond, WA: telephone (425) 885-8277; fax (425) 887-8431.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 186 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

<bullet> June 4, 5, 6:
    <bullet> Working Group 4, ASA Minimum Aviation System Performance 
Standards (MASPS)
    <bullet> Joint Working Group 1, Operations and Implementation
<bullet> June 7:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Chairman's Introductory Remarks, Review 
of Meeting Agenda, Review/Approval of Previous Meeting Summary)
    <bullet> USAF/DOD Requirements Process
    <bullet> EUROCAE WG-51 Status Report (WG-51 Participation with ASA 
Minimum Aviation System Performance Standard (MASPS); WG-53 ``Top 
Down'' Methodology)
    <bullet> SC-186 Activity Reports
    <bullet> WG-1, Operations & Implementation
    <bullet> WG-2, Traffic Information Service--Broadcast (TIS-B)
    <bullet> WG-3, 1090 MHz Minimum Operational Performance Standard 
(MOPS)
    <bullet> WG-4, Application Technical Requirements
    <bullet> WG-5, Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) MOPS
    <bullet> Ad Hoc MASPS Working Group (DO-242)
    <bullet> Closing Session (Review Actions Items/Work Program, Other 
Business, Date, Place and Time of Next Meeting, Adjourn)

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 9, 2001.
Janice L. Peters,
FAA Special Assistant, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 01-12233 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   797
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,453
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,307
<OTHER-SE>                                   (100,963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       797
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (38,653)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,506)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,506)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 8 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-40180 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Carlos Alexis Perez-Lainez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:22-CR-1075-1 

______________________________ 

Before Willett, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Alexis 

Perez-Lainez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Lainez has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

September 20, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-40180 Document: 00516902640 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2023
No. 23-40180 

2 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th 

Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-40180 Document: 00516902640 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/20/2023
Exhibit 10.5
 
    1.
Defined Terms
 2.
Term of Amendment
  3. Guaranteed Selling Margin
Rate (GSMR).
  Product Category
    
    GSMRTriage® BNP Test (excluding the BNP
Tests for Beckman Systems)
    
    
    11.0
    %D-Dimer Products
    
    
    11.0
    %Triage® TOX Drug Screen Products
    
    
    10.5
    %DOA Products (excluding Triage® TOX
Drug Screen Products)
    
    
    16.0
    %Cardiac Products
    
    
    5
    %




---



##### 



4. Direct Distribution of
BNP Tests for Beckman Systems.
 5. End
User Sales Performance Criteria
 Minimum FHC End User Sales forCalendar Year
    
    Co-Exclusivity2009
    
    
    $124,500,0002010
    
    
    $114,100,000
 ® ®
 Minimum FHC End User Sales ForCalendar Year
    
    Inverness Termination2009
    
    
    $121,600,0002010
    
    
    $108,900,000
 2




---



##### 



6.
Limitation of Liability
 7. GSMR for Uniquely New Products and Improved Products
 8.
Miscellaneous
 INVERNESS MEDICAL INNOVATIONSNORTH AMERICA, INC.
    
    Fisher Healthcare, adivision of Fisher ScientificCompany, L.L.C.By (SIGNATURE)
Title President
11 July 2008
    
    By (SIGNATURE)
Title President
         11 July 2008By (SIGNATURE)
Title Senior Vice President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6450

DAVID EDWARD MANN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA96-1049-3-18BC) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 24, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David E. Mann, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate j udge and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Mann v. South Carolina , No. CA-96-1049-3-18BC (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6949

SHONTA HELTON , Plaintiff

- Appell a nt ,

v. PATRICIA YELDELL, Warden, Leath Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. ( 5:19

- cv
- 02789

- DCC )

Submitted : October 28, 2020 Decided: November 9, 2020 Amended: November 10, 2020

Before KEENAN, DIAZ , and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Shonta Helton , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Shonta Helton seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepti ng the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely Helton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) (explaining that § 2254 petition s are subject to one

- year statute of limitations, running f rom latest of four
commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue ab sent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable an d that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez , 565 U.S. at 140

- 41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Helton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Philadelphia Board of Trade

A subsidiary of the
Prtiladeiphia Stock Exchange

1900 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-3584
Telephone: 215-496-5000
Fax: 215-496-1519

Rule Self-Certification
October 12, 2006

Office of the Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" St. N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File SR-PBOT-2006-08: Rule Certification
Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Commission Rule 40.6, the Philadelphia Board of Trade (“PBOT”) proposes
to amend its fee schedule, as set forth below. There were no opposing views among the
PBOT’s Executive Committee concerning these fee schedule changes.

The PBOT intends to implement these amendments no sooner than one business day
following the Commission’s receipt of this filing.

The PBOT certifies that these changes to the PBOT’s fee schedule comply with the
Commodity Exchange Act and the rules thereunder.

Yours truly,

C. Robert Paul
Executive Vice President

And General Counsel

cc: Mr. Allen J. Cooper
Ms. Jane Croessmann



Additions underlined; deletions bracketed and struck through

Fee Schedule
TRANSACTION CHARGES
A. LIBOR based-products
a. Customer: $1.50 per contract side
b. Firm: $0.50 per contract side
c. Market Maker: $0.20-per contract side

MEMBERSHIP-RELATED FEES

A. Application{;nitiation] and Seat Transfer Fees:

a. Application Fee: [$590.00] $350.00
b. Seat Transfer Fee: $250.00!
B. Seat Lease

a. $100.00 per month

C. Membership dues: $500 per month per membership”

a. Accredit of $1 per contract side traded will be applied against the total
membership dues paid in a calendar year, but not to exceed the total
membership dues paid in a calendar year

b. PBOT members or member organizations that are also clearing
members of the Options Clearing Corporation are exempt

| This fee is waived until January 1, 2007
2 Membership dues will become effective on November 1, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Loretta Ryme, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — attempted criminal sale of controlled substance, fifth degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-383-028]


Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 1, 2001.
    Take notice that on April 26, 2001, Dominion Transmission, Inc. 
(DTI) filed with the Commission the following tariff sheet to correct 
and update the description of a previously filed negotiated rate 
transaction:

First Revised Sheet No. 1402

    DTI requests an effective date of April 1, 2001, for the negotiated 
rate.
    DTI states that copies of the filing have been served on all 
parties on the official service list, DTI's customers, and interested 
state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11347 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Reed *v.*Langley.

Appeal from Tallapoosa Circuit Court.

Tried before the Hon. N. D. Denson.

E. M. Oliver and Garrett & Lackey, for appellant.

Thos. L. Bulger and James W. Stroti-ier, for appel-

*650Opinion by

Tyson, J.

This was a statutory action of ejectment, brought by the appellee against the appellant, to recover certain lands specifically described in the complaint. From a judgment in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

The judgment is affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 52005IP0177 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005IP0177

**European Parliament resolution on the Seminar of Governmental Experts on Climate Change **

*
Official Journal 092 E , 20/04/2006 P. 0384 - 0387 *

ANNEX III

MOTION OF CENSURE

on the Commission

concerning protection against the risk of conflict of interests

(B6-0318/2005)

SIGNATORIES IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER

Adwent Filip, Allister James Hugh, Attard-Montalto John, Baco Peter, Batten Gerard, Belder Bastiaan, Blokland Johannes, Bloom Godfrey, Bonde Jens-Peter, Booth Graham, Borghezio Mario, Brie André, van Buitenen Paul, Callanan Martin, Camre Mogens, Chruszcz Sylwester, Clark Derek, Couteaux Paul Marie, Czarnecki Marek, Czarnecki Ryszard, de Brun Bairbre, Evans Jill, Farage Nigel, Giertych Maciej, Goudin Hélène, Grabowski Dariusz, de Groen-Kouwenhoven Elly, Guidoni Umberto, Hannan Daniel, Heaton-Harris Christopher, Helmer Roger, Hudghton Ian, Karatzaferis Georgios, Knapman Roger, Kozlik Sergej, Krarup Ole, Krupa Urszula, Liotard Kartika Tamara, Louis Patrick, Lucas Caroline, Lundgren Niels, McDonald Mary Lou, Markov Helmuth, Martin Hans-Peter, Masiel Jan Tadeusz, Meijer Erik, Mote Ashley, Natrass Michael Henry, Pek Bogdan, Pflüger Tobias, Piotrowski Miroslaw Mariusz, Portas Miguel, Ransdorf Miloslav, Remek Vladimir, Resetartis Karin, Rogalski Bogusław, Rutowicz Leopold Józef, Salvini Matteo, Schlyter Carl, Sinnott Kathy, Sjöstedt Jonas, Speroni Francesco Enrico, Staes Bart, Sumberg David, Svenson Eva-Britt, Titford Jeffrey, Tomczak Witold, Uca Feleknas, Verges Paul, de Villiers Philippe, Wagenknech Sahra, Whittaker John, Wierzejski Wojciech, Wise Thomas, Wohlin Lars, Železný Vladimir, Zimmer Gabriele

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") of GFY Foods, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), I, Edward E. Schwalb, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: July 14, 2004                         /s/ Edward E. Schwalb
                                             --------------------------
                                             Edward E. Schwalb
                                             Chief Financial Officer