alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
 **Certification of the Principal Executive Officer**
 **(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**
 
 I, Don M. Gibson, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) [Reserved - not effective]
 
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 12, 2004
 /s/ Don M. Gibson
 Don M. Gibson
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
May 17, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2676.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of July 2008 Wheat options.

This option contract ordinarily would be authorized for trading in April 2007. Due to customer
demand, the Exchange intends to list this contract earlier than usual (i.e., as of May 18, 2006).

This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.
There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 176 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 176

 To relocate the headquarters of the Appalachian Regional Commission, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Griffith introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To relocate the headquarters of the Appalachian Regional Commission, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Appalachian Regional Commission 
Relocation Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Regional commissions, such as the Delta Regional 
        Authority, the Denali Commission, and the Northern Border 
        Regional Commission, are each headquartered in their respective 
        region.
            (2) Headquartering regional commissions within the region 
        affected is a sensible approach to ensure that the commissions 
        are housed in more affordable locations than the District of 
        Columbia, thereby reducing administrative overhead and making 
        the commissions closer and more accountable to the people the 
        commissions were designed to serve.

SEC. 3. HEADQUARTERS OF THE APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 14301 of title 40, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Headquarters.--The headquarters of the Commission shall be 
located in the Appalachian region.''.
    (b) Implementation.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Federal Cochairman of the Commission 
        shall take such actions as may be necessary to carry out the 
        amendment made in subsection (a).
            (2) Extension.--The Federal Cochairman of the Commission 
        may extend, by up to 180 days, the period for implementation 
        specified in paragraph (1) if the Federal Cochairman submits to 
        the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
        of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate written notice of the need for the 
        extension.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the“Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. James Dearlove, Chief Executive Officer of Penn VirginiaResource GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Partnership. 

March 1, 2007 

 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does
hereby certify that the foregoing Quarterly Report of CLAIMSNET.COM INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"):

         (1)      Fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Don Crosbie

Don Crosbie
-------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 29, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

AMMON BUNDY; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 16-30080

D.C. No. 3:16-cr-00051-BR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 16, 2016 

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Defendants appeal interlocutorily from the district court’s order denying

their motion to prohibit their transportation for twelve days, pursuant to writs of

habeas corpus ad prosequendum, for arraignment on separate charges in the

District of Nevada. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount

FILED

JUN 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
them here. We dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction, and deny the

petition for writ of mandamus.

Although this court’s jurisdiction is typically limited to final decisions of the

district court, defendants argue that we have jurisdiction over this interlocutory

appeal under the collateral order doctrine. Under the collateral order doctrine, a

non-final order is appealable if it: (1) “conclusively determine[s] the disputed

question”; (2) “resolve[s] an important issue completely separate from the merits

of the action”; and (3) is “effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final

judgment.” United States v. Romero-Ochoa, 554 F.3d 833, 836 (9th Cir. 2009)

(citation omitted). 

Even if defendants can satisfy the first two prongs, they fail to satisfy the

third. Whether defendants have suffered any prejudice as a result of dual

prosecutions can be reviewed on direct appeal from a conviction. See United

States v. Tillman, 756 F.3d 1144, 1149-50 (9th Cir. 2014) (holding that an order

disqualifying defense counsel was not immediately appealable because its validity

may be addressed through “a direct appeal, if there is one”); United States v.

Mehrmanesh, 652 F.2d 766, 770 (9th Cir. 1981) (holding that an order denying a

motion to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act was not immediately

appealable because “[t]hose rights can still be vindicated by appeal after trial or,

2
when an indisputable mathematical error or a truly egregious delay has occurred,

by mandamus before trial”). Therefore, we dismiss defendants’ interlocutory

appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. 

We also decline to grant defendants’ alternative request for mandamus relief. 

Mandamus relief is an “extraordinary remedy” which is only justified in

“exceptional circumstances amounting to a judicial usurpation of power.”

Romero-Ochoa, 554 F.3d at 839 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 

At this time, the standard for mandamus relief has not been met. See id. (setting

forth guiding principles to determine whether to grant a mandamus petition). 

Appeal DISMISSED, petition DENIED.

3
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*WILLIAM ARMSTRONG

*Jeanne M. Zulick,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Eileen F. McCarthy,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 657 (AC 24120), is denied.
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
GI NEW, YORK.

World Financial Center
One North End Avenue, 13 Floor
New York, New York 10282

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

06-5
March 10,2006 «

Ms. Jean A. Webb
Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission -

Three Lafayette Centre OTF
1155 21" Street, NW Eau
Washington, DC 20581 L

Re: Amendments to Rule 4.07 -
Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act and Regulation 40.6

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Section Sc(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and
Commission Regulation 40.6, the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. (“Exchange”)
submits, by written certification, amendments to Rule 4.07, attached as Exhibit A.

Rule 4.07, Trading Hours, currently lists the Pulp trading hours as 7:55 am to 9:00 am. The
amendments change the hours to 7:55 am to 8:55 am. Having the market end five minutes earlier
will allow traders to participate in the Pulp closing period prior to the opening of the Sugar No. 11
market at 9:00 am.

The Exchange certifies that the amendments comply with the requirements of the
Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

In accordance with Rule 3.17(b), the Exchange’s Executive Committee approved the
amendments at its meeting on March 1, 2006. No substantive opposing views were expressed by

members or others with respect to the amendments. The amendments will go into on March 16,
2006.


-2-

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 212-748-

4084.
Sincerely,
Jill S. Fassler
Vice President
Associate General Counsel

ce: Riva Adriance

CFTC, Division of Market Oversight
Allen Cooper

CFTC, New York Regional Office



(In the text of the amendments below, additions are under lined and deletions are bracketed and

lined out.)

Rule 4.07. Trading Hours

(a) Unless otherwise directed by the Board, the trading hours of the Exchange shall be as follows:

(i) Agriculture Contracts Trading Hours

CONTRACT
Cocoa Futures
and Options

Coffee “C” Futures and
Options

Mini Coffee “C”
Futures

Cotton No. 2 Futures and

Options

Ethanol Futures and

Options

FCOJ Futures and
Options

FCOS Spot

Pulp Futures and
Options

Sugar No. 11 Futures
and Options

Sugar No. 14 Futures

OPEN
8:00 AM

9:15 AM

9:15 AM

10:30 AM

Pre-Open com-
mences at 10:20 AM
8:50 AM

10:00 AM

Pre-Open com-
mences at 9:45 AM
12:45 PM

7:55 AM

9:00 AM

8:40 AM

CLOSE
11:50 AM
Closing period commences at 11:45 AM

12:30 PM
Closing period commences at 12:28 PM

12:30 PM
Closing period commences at 12:28 PM

2:15 PM
Closing period commences at 2:14 PM
Pre-Close commences at 2:00 PM

12:10 PM
Closing period commences at 12:08 PM

1:30 PM
Closing period commences at 1:29 PM
Pre-Close commences at 1:15 PM

1:15 PM

[9:00] 8:55 AM
Closing period commences [8:58] 8:53 AM

12:00 PM
Closing period commences at 11:58 AM

Suspended at 11:58 AM, with a closing call commencing at
12:00PM. In the case of a delayed closing call, as may be
determined by the Caller, the Closing Call shall commence at
12:10 PM.

EXHIBIT A
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Applica Incorporated
for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Harry D. Schulman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Applica Incorporated, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Applica Incorporated. Dated: March 8, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Harry D. SchulmanHarry D. Schulman
President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24358-24359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-73-000]


Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., Rusk County Electric 
Cooperative, Inc., Upshur-Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Wood County 
Electric Cooperative, Inc., Notice of Filing

May 7, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2001, Northeast Texas Electric 
Cooperative, Inc., Rusk County Electric Cooperative, Inc., Upshur-Rural 
Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Wood County Electric Cooperative, Inc. 
tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission), a Petition for a Declaratory Order in the above-captioned 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 31, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

[[Page 24359]]

instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www./ferc.fed.us/
efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11970 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
cme é

ure.G

Chicago Mercantile Exchange
20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax
www.eme.com

December 21, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20581

Re: Section Sc(c)(1), Regulation 40.6(a) Submission. Self-Certification
of Delisting of CME X-Funds Futures Contracts.
Submission #05-133

Dear Ms. Webb:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. hereby informs the Commission of the delisting of CME X-
Fund Futures Contracts. Delisting will take effect on Friday, December 23, 2005.

The Exchange certifies that the Delisting of CME X-Funds complies with the Act & regulations
thereunder.

If you require any additional information regarding this action, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Charles Piszczor at 312-930-4536 or via e-mail at cpiszczo@cme.com. We would be
appreciative if you could reference our CME Submission #05-133 in any related correspondence.

Sincerely,

q
oO y
CS Uw

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                   Certification of Periodic Financial Reports

I, James C. Eckert, of Omni Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
         30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2)      the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of Omni Energy Services Corp.


Dated:  August 14, 2003


                                          /s/ James C. Eckert
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          James C. Eckert
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                          HEADLANDS MORTGAGE COMPANY
 
           STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    FOR THE
                                                                  THREE MONTHS
                                                                     ENDED
                                                                   MARCH 31,
                                                                  ------------
                                                                      1998
                                                                  ------------
<S>                                                               <C>
  Basic and diluted pro forma income per share:
    Pro forma net loss to common Stockholders(1)................. $ (9,728,110)
                                                                  ============
    Weighted average shares outstanding(2)--basic................   17,284,746
    Weighted average shares outstanding(2)--diluted..............   17,284,746
    Pro forma earnings per share--basic..........................        (0.56)
                                                                  ============
    Pro forma earnings per share--diluted........................        (0.56)
                                                                  ============
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Prior to January 31, 1998, the Company was treated as an S corporation for
    federal and state income tax purposes. The pro forma presentation reflects
    the provision for income taxes as if the Company had always been fully
    subject to federal and state taxes as a C corporation at the effective tax
    rate of 42%. The pro forma presentation also reflects the one-time, non-
    cash charge relating to deferred income taxes on historical earnings
    resulting from termination of the Company's S corporation status.
 
(2) No shares related to the Company's stock option plan were included in the
    weighted average number of shares outstanding, as their effect would have
    been anti-dilutive for the period presented.
Clear All

        14 August 2023    

                    USS Porter rescues four divers off North Carolina coast during Large Scale Exercise 2023                 
                Guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) rescued four scuba divers who were separated from the pleasure craft Big Bill’s and had not resurfaced on Aug. 13.  They were reported missing for nearly 14 hours.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 41 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 41 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2