alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11739]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-930; COC-48469]


Public Land Order No. 7485; Extension of Public Land Order No. 
6846; CO

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order extends Public Land Order No. 6846 for an 
additional 10-year period. This extension is necessary to continue the 
protection of the Wild and Scenic River values in the South Platte 
River. These lands have been and will remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 12, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State 
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7093, 303-239-
3706.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Public Land Order No. 6846, which withdrew National Forest 
System lands to protect the Wild and Scenic River values in a 9-mile 
segment of the South Platte River corridor, is hereby extended for an 
additional 10-year period following its date of expiration.
    2. This withdrawal will expire 10 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted prior to the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1994), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: April 12, 2001.
Gale A. Norton,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 01-11739 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-18 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BALA CYNWYD CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         947,606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               947,606
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 947,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          239,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       229,578
<OTHER-SE>                                     478,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   947,606
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,614
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,614
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MYKOLA POPOVICH, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 11-70068 Agency No. A089-551-471
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 9, 2014 ** San Francisco, California Before: IKUTA, N.R. SMITH, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Mykola Popovich petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) order dismissing his appealof an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholdi ng of removal, and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT). Because Popovich filed his asylum 

# FILED
OCT 16 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).application after May 11, 2005, the Real ID Act applies. See Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). The IJ’s adverse credibility finding was supported by substantial evidence, including inconsistencies between Popovich’s testimony and his asylum application. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1039–40 (listing REAL ID Act credibility factors, including “the consistency betweenthe applicant’s or witness’s written and oral statements”). For example, Popovich stated in his asylum application that he saw young men running away from his violently damaged car, while at the hearing he testified that he knew the perpetrato rs were with his persecutor because they “were not even in a hurry to run away a nd they were threatening me that the same thing that happened to the car would happe n to me.” The BIA and IJ’s adverse credibility determination was also supported by the implausibility of Popovich’s testimony. See Jibril v. Gonzales , 423 F.3d 1129, 1135 (9th Cir. 2005). Among other things, Popovich testified that he made no effort to obtain critical photographs he sent to himself via certif ied mail in Ukraine, which would have provided compelling evidence supporting his asylum claim. The BIA did not err in determining that, absent Popovich’s testimony, the record does not sustain Popovich’s burden to show he is eligible for asylum due to
2persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution. See Deloso v. Ashcroft , 393 F.3d 858, 863–64 (9th Cir. 2005). For the same reason, the BIA’s denial of Popovich’s claim for withholding of removal was supported by substantial evidence. See Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006). Nor did the BIA err in concluding, based on the record without Popovich’s testimony, that Popovich failed to sustain his burden to show eligibility for relief under CAT. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156–57 (9th Cir. 2003). PETITION DENIED.

3
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AK-962-1410-HY-P; F-19557]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

    Authority: 43 CFR 2650.7(d)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving 
lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act will be issued to the Heirs, Devisees, and/or Assigns of Evans 
Egowa for lands in T. 1 S., R. 1 W., Fairbanks Meridian, located in 
Fairbanks, Alaska. Notice of the decision will also be published four 
times in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until June 15, 2001 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerri Sansone (907) 271-3231.

Jerri Sansone,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 01-12257 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0199 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0199

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2001/51/EC establishing a Programme relating to the Community framework strategy on gender equality and Decision No 848/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community action programme to promote organisations active at European level in the field of equality between men and women (COM(2004)0551 - C6-0107/2004 - 2004/0194(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 117 E , 18/05/2006 P. 0167 - 0167 *

P6_TA(2005)0199

Equality action programmes ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2001/51/EC establishing a Programme relating to the Community framework strategy on gender equality and Decision No 848/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community action programme to promote organisations active at European level in the field of equality between men and women (COM(2004) 0551 — C6-0107/2004 — 2004/0194(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0551) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 13(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0107/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A6-0132/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Considers that the financial statement of the Commission proposal is compatible with the ceiling of heading 3 of the current Financial Perspectives, without prejudicing other policies;

4. Calls on the Commission explicitly to make adequate budgetary provision in the new Financial Perspectives for the period 2007-2013 for the Programme relating to the Community framework strategy on gender equality (2001-2005) [2] and for the Community action programme to promote organisations active at European level in the field of equality between men and women [3];

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ L 17, 19.1.2001, p. 22.

[3] OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 18.

--------------------------------------------------
154 So. 918

#### T. S. McDIARMID v. Jas. L. HERRING.

7 Div. 223.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 24, 1934.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution..
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Milton Smith, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on April 16, 1986, unanimously affirmed. Motion by appellant for leave to file a supplemental *pro se*brief denied. No opinion. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             6,384
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    132,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                       3,092
<INVENTORY>                                       87,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 228,132
<PP&E>                                           166,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                    52,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   488,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             83,817
<BONDS>                                          181,607
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              13
<OTHER-SE>                                       211,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     488,831
<SALES>                                          504,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 504,871
<CGS>                                            374,788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    484,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 8,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   18,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                       7,199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               11,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      11,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.90


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Clayton S. Construction, LLC and Clayton 

Shoot, 

 

 Appellants,

v.

Roy B. Ferguson, and Pene S. Ferguson 

d/b/a The Ferguson Law Firm,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00190-CV

Appeal from the

394th District Court

of Brewster County, Texas 

(TC# CVB20435)

O R D E R

On January 5, 2022, the Texas Supreme Court of Texas ordered that the above-styled and 

numbered cause be transferred to the Seventh Court of Appeals, in Amarillo, Texas, and it 

instructed this Court to issue an order transferring the cause. It is therefore ordered that the Clerk 

of the Court take the steps necessary to transfer the case to the Seventh Court of Appeals in 

compliance with the Supreme Court’s order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
**Exhibit
      14.3**





**Ariel
      Way, Inc** **Code
      of Ethics for Financial Operation and Financial Officers**





In
      addition to our general ethical business conduct policy applicable to all Ariel
      Way employees, financial officers of Ariel Way, Inc. are also subject to
      additional rules designed to aid in assuring that Ariel Way's financial
      reporting is proper and transparent. A copy of our general ethical business
      conduct policy, called our Code of Business Conduct, is attached to the
      code.





Accounting
      entries, invoices and other documentation must describe the transactions to
      which they relate. There may be no omissions of any company transactions from
      the books and records, no advance income recognition and no hidden bank accounts
      or funds that could result in any significant deficiencies in Ariel Way's
      disclosure of financial information in its financial statements. Our SEC reports
      and other public financial documents like earnings releases and investor
      presentations must be prepared and presented in a full, fair, accurate, timely
      and understandable manner.





Each
      financial officer is expected to promptly report what he or she believes in
      good
      faith is a violation of the law or Company policy, including any fraud involving
      employees who have a substantial role in our financial reporting, whether
      accidental or deliberate, by any Ariel Way employee. Financial officers must
      also report any significant deficiencies in Ariel Way's internal controls that
      could adversely affect disclosure of financial information in Ariel Way's
      financial statements. The knowing failure to report a violation is itself a
      violation of our policies. Employees will not be disciplined or suffer
      retribution for reporting honestly and in good faith suspected violations.
      You
      may report any such violations to your superior. Alternatively, if you prefer
      or
      you think your superior will not adequately respond, you may report (including
      anonymously if you wish) through Ariel Way's Internal Control Line, the
      procedures for which are spelled out on Ariel Way's website.





Our
      policy is to cooperate with all government investigations of possible unlawful
      conduct. If a criminal violation has occurred, we will take appropriate steps
      to
      stop the illegal conduct and to prevent it from recurring.





Disciplinary
      action for any violation of this policy or our ethics policies will be the
      prerogative of the Company's management and/or Board of Directors and may
      include a reprimand which is documented in the personnel file, loss of
      compensation, change of responsibilities to avoid repeat violations, demotion,
      termination or other measures deemed appropriate.





If
      you
      have any questions concerning the Code, please contact Ariel Way's Corporate
      Legal Counsel.
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-22 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 20 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 43 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 43 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 43 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 43 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 43 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 43 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 43 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 13 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 18 of 18
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending November 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Jay Lutsky, Principal Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Jay Lutsky



 Jay Lutsky,

 Principal Executive Officer and Director

May 25, 2004
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely
for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Hague
Corp., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the company’s financial condition and results of operations.








May 15,
2009








/s/ Brian Lukian


Brian
Lukian, Chief Financial Officer