alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24339-24340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research; Notice of 
Solicitation for NOAA Science Advisory Board Members

ACTION: Notice of solicitation for NOAA Science Advisory Board members.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere is soliciting 
nominations for membership on the NOAA Science Advisory Board (SAB). 
The SAB is the only Federal Advisory Committee with responsibility to 
advise the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on 
long- and

[[Page 24340]]

short-range strategies for research, education, and application of 
science to resource management and environmental assessment and 
prediction. The SAB was originally chartered under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2., on September 25, 1997, with the 
General Services Administration's concurrence.

DATES: Resumes should be sent to the address specified and must be 
received by June 13, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Dr. Michael S. Uhart, Executive Director; NOAA Science 
Advisory Board; 1315 East-West Highway, Room 11142; Silver Spring, 
Maryland 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael Uhart at the address given 
above; telephone (301) 713-9121 or fax (301) 713-3515.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SAB activities and advice provide necessary 
input to ensure that NOAA science programs are of the highest quality 
and provide optimal support to resource management and environmental 
assessment and prediction. The panel provides advice to the Under 
Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on such matters as:
    (a) climate monitoring, assessment, and prediction;
    (b) recovering protected and endangered species;
    (c) R & D leading to advances in short-term weather warning and 
forecast services;
    (d) the effective collection, management, and utilization of 
environmental data;
    (e) assessment, development, utilization, and conservation of ocean 
and coastal resources;
    (f) the integration of technology and scientific information into 
decision-making and operational processes; and
    (g) such other matters as the Under Secretary refers to the panel 
for review and advice.
    The SAB is to consist of 15 members reflecting the full breadth of 
NOAA's areas of responsibility. The SAB meets at least twice each year, 
exclusive of subcommittee, task force, and working group meetings. 
Panel members must be willing to participate in periodic reviews of the 
conduct, support, and use of science in NOAA laboratories and programs. 
Panel members are appointed for a 3-year term.

    Dated: May 7, 2001.
Louisa Koch,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Research.
[FR Doc. 01-11994 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KD-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Etelos, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: December 31,  2008 | /s/ Daniel J.A. Kolke                      |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                          | Daniel J.A. Kolke, Chief Executive Officer |
|                          | (Principal Executive  Officer)             |

 

----
December 27, 2005

Via E-Mail

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 05.219: Notification
of an Amendment to COMEX Division Rule 104.89, Settlement
Price Committee.

Dear Ms. Jean Webb:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of an amendment to
COMEX Rule 104.89, Settlement Price Committee.

Effective Tuesday, January 3, 2006, COMEX Rule 104.89 is amended to install Staff to
serve as a voting member with veto authority over the daily settlement prices in High-Grade
Copper Futures. Staff will be rolled out to the remaining COMEX Futures and Options contracts
as Staff becomes available. Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”)
and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the attached rule amendment complies
with the Act, including regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact me at (212)
299-2940.

Very truly yours,

Nancy M. Minett
Vice President, Compliance

ce: Thomas LaSala
Brian Regan



(Additions are underlined in bold; Deletions are in bold strikethrough.)
COMEX Division Rule 104.89, Settlement Price Committee

(A) The Settlement Price Committee, which shall be a Regular Committee, shall consist of such
members and permittees as the Chairman may appoint with the consent of the Board.
Additionally, one (1) Exchange employee will be a voting member of the Committee in the
Silver Options Contract, and High Grade Copper Futures (additional Futures and Options
contracts to be added as Staff is available). The Exchange employees shall have final authority in
all instances to veto and override price determinations made by the Committee. The Committee
shall be divided into sub-committees for each futures and options contract traded. To the extent
possible, each sub-committee shall consist of at least six (6) Members, at least one of whom shall
be a Floor Broker, one of whom shall be a Floor Trader, and one of whom shall represent trade
interests (either personal, of his employer, or of a substantial customer base).

(B) At the conclusion of the RTH trading session on the Exchange Floor each day,.settlement
prices shall be determined for every contract listed.

(C) The Settlement Price Committee, or any subcommittee thereof, shall have the authority to
request from any member representing that certain market information should be considered in
the determination of a settlement price, such documentation as it deems appropriate including,
but not limited to, trading cards and order tickets.
P:\700\759-133\NOTICE OF ADOPTION FILINGS\Case No.07CV4201-McMahon.doc 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------X 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 21 MC 100 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

----------------------------------X 

DENNIS MCMAHON, 07CV 4201 

 Plaintiff, 

- against – 

WSP CANTOR SEINUK, 

 Defendant. 

---------------------------------X 

NOTICE OF WSP CANTOR SEINUK’S 

ADOPTION OF AMENDED ANSWER TO MASTER COMPLAINT

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants WSP Cantor Seinuk, as 

and for their responses to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the 

Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, hereby 

adopt the Defendants’ Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated 

January 15, 2008, which was filed in the matter of In re World 

Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 06 CV 

12152. 

 WHEREFORE, WSP Cantor Seinuk Defendant demands judgment 

dismissing the above-captioned action as against each of them, 

together with their costs and disbursements. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 June 16, 2008 

Case 1:07-cv-04201-AKH Document 2 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 2
P:\700\759-133\NOTICE OF ADOPTION FILINGS\Case No.07CV4201-McMahon.doc 

 GOGICK, BYRNE & O’NEILL, LLP 

 By: s/Kevin J. O’Neill____________ 

 Kevin J. O’Neill (KJO-5113) 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 WSP Cantor Seinuk 

 11 Broadway, Suite 1560 

 New York, New York 10004-1314 

 (212) 422-9424 

Case 1:07-cv-04201-AKH Document 2 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit********32.2**
  **CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF****2002*******
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce Winston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Bruce Winston
  Bruce Winston
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 
 November 12, 2004
 
 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 1 - Intro to EROS      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn about EROS history and purpose.

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

### **Episode 1 - Intro to EROS**

**Download and Transcript Access**

**Summary**: A rundown of the history of the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, the Landsat program, and the Center's role in the observation and study of landscape change worldwide.

**Guest**: Dr. Thomas Loveland, former Chief Scientist

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: Brian Hauge

**Release date**: Sept. 9, 2019

**More on the history of EROS**: 
                            - EROS Science Center Overview
                            - EROS History Project
                            - EROS Archive

## Related Content

                  -              Multimedia           

Below are multimedia items associated with this project.

EROS Science Center Overview

November 21, 2017

#### EROS Science Center Overview

link

The EROS Science Center is responsible for acquiring earth observations, archiving that data, and developing applications for the data to learn more about our planet. Visit https://eros.usgs.gov 

Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center , Communications and Publishing

November 21, 2017

#### EROS Science Center Overview

link

#### EROS Science Center Overview

link

The EROS Science Center is responsible for acquiring earth observations, archiving that data, and developing applications for the data to learn more about our planet. Visit https://eros.usgs.gov 

Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center , Communications and Publishing

## Related Content

Below are multimedia items associated with this project.

EROS Science Center Overview

November 21, 2017

#### EROS Science Center Overview

link

The EROS Science Center is responsible for acquiring earth observations, archiving that data, and developing applications for the data to learn more about our planet. Visit https://eros.usgs.gov 

Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center , Communications and Publishing

November 21, 2017

#### EROS Science Center Overview

link

#### EROS Science Center Overview

link

The EROS Science Center is responsible for acquiring earth observations, archiving that data, and developing applications for the data to learn more about our planet. Visit https://eros.usgs.gov 

Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center , Communications and Publishing

### Contacts
# EUR-Lex - 52004XC0206(03) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004XC0206(03)

**Notice to importers — Imports of sugar into the Community from Serbia and Montenegro **

*
Official Journal C 033 , 06/02/2004 P. 0009 - 0009 *

Notice to importers

Imports of sugar into the Community from Serbia and Montenegro

(2004/C 33/04)

The European Commission reminds importers of the notice to importers published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 152 of 26.6.2002, p. 14. Community operators were thereby informed that there was reasonable doubt as to the proper application of the preferential arrangements for sugar of headings CN 1701 and CN 1702, which was declared at import as originating in the countries of the western Balkans in order to benefit from preferential tariff measures.

The preferential arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000 for sugar of CN codes 1701 and 1702 imported from Serbia and Montenegro were suspended for a period of three months by Commission Regulation (EC) No 764/2003. This suspension was extended for an additional period of six months by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1343/2003. The suspension measure was decided on the basis of findings that the system of certification and control of the preferential origin of sugar did not allow the competent authorities of this beneficiary country to verify the originating status of the products and to provide administrative cooperation as required for the verification of evidence of origin.

The deficiencies identified in Serbia and Montenegro's system of certification and control of preferential origin persist to date. The Commission therefore informs operators that it may decide to extend the current suspension beyond its expiry date of 7 February 2004.

The present notice to importers replaces the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union C 177 of 26.7.2003, p. 2.
Case 1:07-cv-05365-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05365-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 63 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 63 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 63 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH     Document 8      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH     Document 8      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Symetra Financial Corporation (the
registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [paragraph omitted in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 14, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Randall H. TalbotRandall H. TalbotPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001046002
<NAME> ALLIANCE BANCORP OF NEW ENGLAND, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          8,556
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              4
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               23,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    51,147
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         27,199
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           26,600
<LOANS>                                       198,045
<ALLOWANCE>                                     3,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                320,049
<DEPOSITS>                                    259,611
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             1,815
<LONG-TERM>                                    43,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           25
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                320,049
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 3,928
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               1,567
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  197
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                5,692
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              2,309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,884
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           2,808
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      87
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                104
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,051
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      1,051
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      771
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.97
<LOANS-NON>                                     1,160
<LOANS-PAST>                                      253
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 2,731
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                3,200
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      43
<RECOVERIES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               3,250
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            3,250
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           596


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Price, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), rendered March 6, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Despite the conduct of the prosecutor, which conduct we do not condone, the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial *(see, People v Rivera,*39 NY2d 519, 523; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). We note that the trial court promptly handled the objectionable conduct of the prosecutor so as to avoid any possible prejudice to the defendant. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 22 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 22 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 22 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for
the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
year ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Neil J. Hennessy                                   
|Neil J. Hennessy, Chief Executive Officer and
President
|Hennessy Advisors Inc.                                 
|                                                       
|Date: December 8, 2006
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 0002 2

- CR

Edward Flores

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (130873 9 D )

March 13, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal i s dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM