alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Thomas Hughes, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

February 2, 1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Paul J. Ginnelly*for petitioner.

*Donald J. Martin*for respondent.

*279OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on September 12, 1972, and has maintained an office for the practice of law in Syracuse, New York. On April 12, 1989, he was convicted, upon his plea of guilty in Syracuse City Court, of two counts of attempted fraud of a notary public, in violation of Executive Law § 135-a (2) and Penal Law § 110.00. On April 26, 1989, he was temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending further order of the court pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f).

Thereafter he was charged by the Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District with violation of three Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility in connection with the incident giving rise to the criminal charges:

1. DR 1-102 (A) (3): A lawyer shall not engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude.

2. DR 1-102 (A) (4): A lawyer shall not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.

3. DR 1-102 (A) (5): A lawyer shall not engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.

Respondent admitted in his answer to the petition that, in order to obtain bail money that had been posted for a client, he signed the bail assignment release using the name of the person to whom the bail receipt was made out, without the knowledge or consent of that person. He also admitted that he used the notary stamp of a paralegal in the office where he had shared space and signed the notary’s name, notarizing the false signature on the bail assignment release so that he could obtain the bail money which he claimed as his fee.

Respondent asserts in mitigation that he was an undiagnosed alcoholic at the time of the misconduct and that he is now in treatment and abstaining from alcohol. There is no indication in the record before us that respondent had any intent to steal.

Respondent’s admitted conduct involved deliberate dishonesty and constituted a violation of each of the Disciplinary Rules charged. We have considered the matters respondent has urged in mitigation and his previously unblemished professional record and conclude that respondent should be sus*280pended from the practice of law for three years, effective April 26, 1989, and until further order of the court.

Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Boomer, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.
# EUR-Lex - 52004XX0417(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004XX0417(01)

**The European Ombudsman - Information **

*
Official Journal C 093 , 17/04/2004 P. 0032 - 0032 *

Information

(2004/C 93/12)

The European Ombudsman has amended the implementing provisions that have been in force since 1 January 2003 in order to provide for complaints in new Treaty languages, following the enlargement of the European Union. The implementing provisions are available on the Ombudsman's website at: http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int

Paper copies can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman's office: 1, Avenue du Président Robert Schuman - BP 403 - F-67001 Strasbourg Cedex. Tel. (33-3) 88 17 23 13, Fax (33-3) 88 17 90 62, E-mail: euro-ombudsman@europarl.eu.int
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,076,000
<SECURITIES>                                   170,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,730,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   883,000
<INVENTORY>                                 17,468,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,787,000
<PP&E>                                      45,766,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,479,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,886,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,921,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       239,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,006,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,886,000
<SALES>                                     18,784,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,784,000
<CGS>                                       15,452,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,708,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             350,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,042,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,967,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                585,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   510,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1584 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1584

              To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2019

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Sovereignty Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 115 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7415) 
is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) of the Clean 
Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ``sections 
126 and 115 (relating to interstate and international pollution 
abatement)'' and inserting ``section 126 (relating to interstate 
pollution abatement)''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2481]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceedings

May 3, 2001.
    Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 
445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed by May 25, 2001. See section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rules (r7 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition 
must be filed within10 days after the time for filing oppositions have 
expired.
    Subject: Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket 
No. 96-45).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
    Subject:

Carriage of Digital Television Broadcast Stations (CS Docket No. 98-
120) Amendments to Part 76 of the Commission's Rules
Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999: 
Local Broadcast Signal Carriage Issues (CS Docket No. 00-96)
Application of Network Non-Duplication, Syndicated Exclusively and 
Sports Blackout Rules to Satellite Retransmission of Broadcast Signals 
(CS Docket No. 00-2)

    Number of Petitions Filed: 10.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11844 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Exhibit 10.2
  
   Retention Payment CIC Agreement CIC Period
 Option
 Compensation
Committee




---



##### 




    
    On February 1, 2011, you will receive a Retention Payment of up to a
maximum of $466,666.67, of which fifty percent (50%) is a fixed amount
and fifty percent (50%) is a discretionary amount determined by the
Compensation Committee.
    
    On August 1, 2011, you will receive a Retention Payment of up to a
maximum of $233,333.33, of which fifty percent (50%) is a fixed amount
and fifty percent (50%) is a discretionary amount determined by the
Compensation Committee.
   Attachment A
 Section 409A




---



##### 



Sincerely,By:
    /s/ Robert KimballRobert KimballPresident and Acting Chief Executive OfficerACCEPTED and AGREED:/s/ Henry Skorny
    Date: April 16, 2010Henry Skorny
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1833 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

35 Tulip Avenue in Floral Park, New York, as the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael 

R. Davidson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2019 

Miss RICE of New York (for herself, Mr. BRINDISI, Ms. CLARKE of New York, 

Mr. COLLINS of New York, Mr. DELGADO, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. ESPAILLAT, 

Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. KATKO, Mr. KING of New York, Mrs. 

LOWEY, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. SEAN PATRICK

MALONEY of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. MORELLE, Mr. NADLER, Ms. 

OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mr. ROSE of New York, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. STEFANIK, 

Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. TONKO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. REED, Ms. 

MENG, and Mr. JEFFRIES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 35 Tulip Avenue in Floral Park, New York, 

as the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael R. Davidson Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1833 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT MICHAEL R. DAVIDSON POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 35 Tulip Avenue in Floral Park, 

5 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lieuten6 ant Michael R. Davidson Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael 

11 R. Davidson Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 18 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 18 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                    EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                                 ---------------------------




                                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                                   BANCINSURANCE
                                                                    CORPORATION
                                                   ----------------------------------------------

<S>                      <C>                                 <C>                             <C>
----------------------   -------------------------------     -----------------------------   -----------------------------
         100%                         100%                              100%                          100%
OHIO INDEMNITY COMPANY   PAUL BOARDWAY & ASSOCIATES, INC.         BCIS SERVICES, INC.             CUSTOM TITLE
(An Insurance Company)        (An Insurance Agency)          (A Cost Containment Provider)   (A Title Lien Search Company)
----------------------   -------------------------------     ------------------------------  -----------------------------
</TABLE>


---------------------------------------------
                BANCINSURANCE
                 CORPORATION
----------------------------------------------

 -----------------------------
              100%
      BIC MANAGEMENT, INC.
 (A Cost Containment Provider)
 -----------------------------
714255_1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------x

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LOCATION

:

:

:

:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

-----------------------------------------------------------------x

WILSON SANCHEZ,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL.,

 Defendants.

: 

: 

:

:

Case No.: 07CV05386 (AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF 

MASTER ANSWER BY 

DEFENDANT JPMORGAN 

CHASE BANK N.A.

-----------------------------------------------------------------x

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. as and 

for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-off Complaint) 

related to the Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopts its Master 

Answer to the Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re 

World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. respectfully requests that 

the above captioned actions be dismissed, with costs, attorneys’ fees, disbursements, and such 

other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dated: New York, New York 

December 17, 2007

SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP

By: /s/James J. Coster_____________

James J. Coster (JC-1431)

230 Park Avenue

Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 27 Filed 12/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
714255_1

2

New York, New York 10169

Tel.: (212) 818-9200

Fax: (212) 818-9606

Attorneys for Defendant

JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.

TO: Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Office of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway

New York, NY 10279

Robert Grochow, Esq. 

Law Office of Robert Grochow

233 Broadway

New York, NY 10279

Christopher LoPalo, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman Napoli and Bern

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006

Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 27 Filed 12/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05369-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05369-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05369-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27194-27195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 165: Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 165 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 165: Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Services.

[[Page 27195]]


DATES: The meeting will be held June 5-7, 2001 starting at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the RTCA Conference Room, 1140 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 165 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

<bullet> June 5, 6, 7:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, Review/
Approve Summary of Previous Meeting, Chairman's Remarks)
    <bullet> Review of SC-165 Working Group Activities
    <bullet> Working Group 1 (AMS(R)S Avionics Equipment Minimum 
Operational Performance Standard (MOPS))
    <bullet> Working Group 3 (AMS(R)S MASPS)
    <bullet> Complete Final Review and Comment (FRAC) Process for 
Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) for the 
Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite (R) Service (ASM(R)S) as Used in 
Aeronautical Data Links
    <bullet> Brief Overview of Related Activities
    <bullet> AEEC 741 and 761 Characteristics
    <bullet> ERUOCAE WG-55
    <bullet> AMS(R)S Spectrum Issues
    <bullet> ICAO Aeronautical Mobile Communications Panel
    <bullet> Industry, Users, Government
    <bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Date and Place of Next 
Meeting, Adjourn)

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 9, 2001.
Janice L. Peters,
FAA Special Assistant, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 01-12234 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. James Dearlove, Chief Executive Officer of Penn Virginia
Resource GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 28, 2008



/s/ A. JAMES DEARLOVEA. James Dearlove Chief Executive Officer


This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1844 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, as the ‘‘Corporal Alex Martinez Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2019 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI (for himself, Mr. RUSH, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. 

LIPINSKI, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, 

Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. 

FOSTER, Mr. BOST, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. UNDERWOOD, 

Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. KINZINGER, Mrs. BUSTOS, and Mr. LAHOOD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, as the ‘‘Corporal Alex Martinez Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL ALEX MARTINEZ MEMORIAL POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1844 IH

1 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Alex Mar2 tinez Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Alex Mar7 tinez Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS