# C_2004324EN.01006801.xml

| 30.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/68

---

REPORT

REPORT

on the annual accounts of the European Training Foundation for the 2003 financial year together with the Foundation's replies

(2004/C 324/10)

CONTENTS

| 1 | INTRODUCTION |
| --- | --- |

1

| 2-5 | THE COURT'S OPINION |
| --- | --- |

2-5

| 6-11 | OBSERVATIONS |
| --- | --- |

6-11

Tables 1 to 4

The Foundation's replies

The Foundation's replies

INTRODUCTION

| 1. | The European Training Foundation (hereinafter called the Foundation) was created by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90 of 7 May 1990 (1). The Foundation's purpose is to support the reform of vocational training in the European Union's partner countries. As such, it assists the Commission in the implementation of various programmes (Phare, Tacis, Cards, Meda). Table 1 summarises the powers and activities of the Foundation on the basis of information supplied by it. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The European Training Foundation (hereinafter called the Foundation) was created by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90 of 7 May 1990 (1). The Foundation's purpose is to support the reform of vocational training in the European Union's partner countries. As such, it assists the Commission in the implementation of various programmes (Phare, Tacis, Cards, Meda). Table 1 summarises the powers and activities of the Foundation on the basis of information supplied by it.

1

Table 1

THE COURT'S OPINION

| 2. | This opinion is addressed to the European Parliament and the Council, in accordance with Article 185(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (2). |
| --- | --- |

2.

This opinion is addressed to the European Parliament and the Council, in accordance with Article 185(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (2).

2

| 3. | The Court has examined the annual accounts of the Foundation for the financial year ended 31 December 2003. In accordance with Article 11(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90, the budget was implemented on the responsibility of the Director. This responsibility includes the drawing-up and presentation of the accounts (3) in accordance with the internal financial provisions adopted on the bases of Article 12 of the same regulation. The Court of Auditors is required under Article 248 of the Treaty establishing the European Community to examine these accounts. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Court has examined the annual accounts of the Foundation for the financial year ended 31 December 2003. In accordance with Article 11(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90, the budget was implemented on the responsibility of the Director. This responsibility includes the drawing-up and presentation of the accounts (3) in accordance with the internal financial provisions adopted on the bases of Article 12 of the same regulation. The Court of Auditors is required under Article 248 of the Treaty establishing the European Community to examine these accounts.

3

| 4. | The Court carried out the audit in accordance with its auditing policies and standards, which are adapted from international standards to reflect the Community context. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Court carried out the audit in accordance with its auditing policies and standards, which are adapted from international standards to reflect the Community context.

| 5. | The Court has thus obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2003 are reliable and that the underlying transactions, taken as a whole, are legal and regular. The content of the following observations does not call the opinion expressed by the Court in this report into question. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Court has thus obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2003 are reliable and that the underlying transactions, taken as a whole, are legal and regular. The content of the following observations does not call the opinion expressed by the Court in this report into question.

OBSERVATIONS

| 6. | Table 2 shows the implementation of appropriations for the 2003 financial year and of appropriations carried over from the previous financial year. The Foundation's revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet for the financial year 2003 are summarised in Tables 3 and 4. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Table 2 shows the implementation of appropriations for the 2003 financial year and of appropriations carried over from the previous financial year. The Foundation's revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet for the financial year 2003 are summarised in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 2

Tables 3 and 4

| 7. | On the basis of agreements concluded with the Commission, the Foundation manages Tempus programmes which also include technical assistance. In 2003, the Foundation made payments of 23,1 million euro on behalf of the Commission for those programmes and, on 31 December 2003, the balance of the relevant bank accounts amounted to 24,2 million euro. About 20 % of the staff employed by the Foundation work full-time on these programmes. As the Court mentioned in previous reports (4), no data relating to these programmes appear in the budget or in the balance sheet; the Foundation presents the relevant financial information in an annex to its annual accounts. This does not comply with the budgetary principles of unity and accuracy (5). |
| --- | --- |

7.

On the basis of agreements concluded with the Commission, the Foundation manages Tempus programmes which also include technical assistance. In 2003, the Foundation made payments of 23,1 million euro on behalf of the Commission for those programmes and, on 31 December 2003, the balance of the relevant bank accounts amounted to 24,2 million euro. About 20 % of the staff employed by the Foundation work full-time on these programmes. As the Court mentioned in previous reports (4), no data relating to these programmes appear in the budget or in the balance sheet; the Foundation presents the relevant financial information in an annex to its annual accounts. This does not comply with the budgetary principles of unity and accuracy (5).

4

5

| 8. | In 2003 the Foundation concluded two agreements with donors (total amount 0,5 million euro). These agreements are correctly disclosed in the accounts but the Foundation did not produce a supplementary and amending budget. |
| --- | --- |

8.

In 2003 the Foundation concluded two agreements with donors (total amount 0,5 million euro). These agreements are correctly disclosed in the accounts but the Foundation did not produce a supplementary and amending budget.

| 9. | Due to payment delays by the Commission, the Foundation was unable to meet its financial commitments. The Foundation had to make in November 2003 a temporary transfer of 1 million euro from bank accounts dedicated to the Tempus programme to its own bank accounts. This operation was done without informing either the Governing Board, or the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

9.

Due to payment delays by the Commission, the Foundation was unable to meet its financial commitments. The Foundation had to make in November 2003 a temporary transfer of 1 million euro from bank accounts dedicated to the Tempus programme to its own bank accounts. This operation was done without informing either the Governing Board, or the Commission.

| 10. | In accordance with Article 43(1) of the Foundation's financial regulation, the accounting officer is required to validate the systems put in place by the authorising officer on accounting information. This validation did not take place during the financial year. |
| --- | --- |

10.

In accordance with Article 43(1) of the Foundation's financial regulation, the accounting officer is required to validate the systems put in place by the authorising officer on accounting information. This validation did not take place during the financial year.

| 11. | An analysis of five selection procedures showed that the process for selecting candidates for the interview (pre-selection phase) is not formalised in a transparent way. In many cases the selection criteria are neither laid down before the interview, nor is their use documented in the files. |
| --- | --- |

11.

An analysis of five selection procedures showed that the process for selecting candidates for the interview (pre-selection phase) is not formalised in a transparent way. In many cases the selection criteria are neither laid down before the interview, nor is their use documented in the files.

This Report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 29 and 30 September 2004.

For the Court of Auditors

Juan Manuel FABRA VALLÉS

President

---

(1)  OJ L 131, 23.5.1990

1

(2)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  As required under Article 83(3) of the Foundation's financial regulation, the final accounts for the financial year 2003 were drawn up on September 8 2004 and forwarded to the Court of Auditors, which received them on September 20 2004. A summarised version of the accounts is presented in the tables annexed to this report.

3

(4)  Paragraph 9 of the report concerning the financial year 2002 (OJ C 319, 30.12.2003, p. 48), see also paragraph 8 of the report concerning the financial year 2001 (OJ C 326, 27.12.2002, p. 51) and paragraph 11 of the report concerning the financial year 1999 (OJ C 373, 27.12.2000, p. 34).

4

(5)  Article 6 of the Foundation's financial regulation.

5

---

Table 1

European Training Foundation (Torino)

| Competences following the Treaty | Competences following the Council's Regulation (CEE) No 1360/90 of 7 May 1990 | Governance | Means available to the Foundation (figures for 2002) | Products |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| The Community shall carry out, within its spheres of competence, economic, financial and technical cooperation measures with third countries. Such measures shall be complementary to those carried out by the Member States and consistent with the development policy of the Community.

  (Article 181 A) | Objectives







  — | Contribute to the provision of training assistance to the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and Mongolia, to some countries of the Balkans area and to the countries and territories eligible to the MEDA programmes |

Competences following the Treaty

Competences following the Council's Regulation (CEE) No 1360/90 of 7 May 1990

Governance

Means available to the Foundation (figures for 2002)

Products

The Community shall carry out, within its spheres of competence, economic, financial and technical cooperation measures with third countries. Such measures shall be complementary to those carried out by the Member States and consistent with the development policy of the Community.

(Article 181 A)

Objectives

—

Contribute to the provision of training assistance to the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and Mongolia, to some countries of the Balkans area and to the countries and territories eligible to the MEDA programmes

| — | Promote the coordination of the assistance given to eligible countries. |
| --- | --- |

—

Promote the coordination of the assistance given to eligible countries.

Tasks

| — | Assistance to define the needs and priorities for training |
| --- | --- |

—

Assistance to define the needs and priorities for training

| — | Provision of informations on initiatives and future needs |
| --- | --- |

—

Provision of informations on initiatives and future needs

| — | Financing pilots projects |
| --- | --- |

—

Financing pilots projects

| — | Implementation of programmes of the Commission in eligible countries. |
| --- | --- |

—

Implementation of programmes of the Commission in eligible countries.

Governing board

| — | One representative of each Member State. |
| --- | --- |

—

One representative of each Member State.

| — | Two representatives of the Commission |
| --- | --- |

—

Two representatives of the Commission

Director

| — | Appointed by the Governing board on a proposal of the Commission |
| --- | --- |

—

Appointed by the Governing board on a proposal of the Commission

Advisory forum

| — | Appointed by the Governing board, |
| --- | --- |

—

Appointed by the Governing board,

| — | Two experts from each Member State, |
| --- | --- |

—

Two experts from each Member State,

| — | Two experts from each eligible country, |
| --- | --- |

—

Two experts from each eligible country,

| — | Two experts from the social partners at European level, |
| --- | --- |

—

Two experts from the social partners at European level,

Financial external control

European Court of Auditors

Discharge

European Parliament on recommendation of the Council.

Budget:

EUR 17,2 mio (EUR 16,8 mio) entirely financed by the Commission.

Staff at 31 of december 2003:

| — | 104 (130) posts in the establishment plan of which 99 (94) posts occupied |
| --- | --- |

—

104 (130) posts in the establishment plan of which 99 (94) posts occupied

| — | 31 (35) other employees (auxiliaries, national experts, interimaires) Total staff occupied: 130 (129) of which employed for: |
| --- | --- |

—

31 (35) other employees (auxiliaries, national experts, interimaires) Total staff occupied: 130 (129) of which employed for:

| — | operational tasks: 80 (78) |
| --- | --- |

—

operational tasks: 80 (78)

| — | administrative tasks: 35 (33) |
| --- | --- |

—

administrative tasks: 35 (33)

| — | mixed tasks: 15 (18). |
| --- | --- |

—

mixed tasks: 15 (18).

Assistance to the Commission:

ETF support covers a wide range of areas including: initial vocational education; lifelong learning; continuing (adult) training; human resource development in companies; employment policies; training of unmployed people; poverty alleviation and social inclusion and training to encourage local development.

Network of observatories in eligible countries:

Country sector studies, statistics on education, policy advice to countries.

Technical Assistance conventions with Cards, Meda and Tacis for Tempus scheme covering:

| — | Joint European Projects (JEP): applications received 507; funded 129 |
| --- | --- |

—

Joint European Projects (JEP): applications received 507; funded 129

| — | Structural and Complementary Measures (SCM) applications received 36; funded 12 |
| --- | --- |

—

Structural and Complementary Measures (SCM) applications received 36; funded 12

| — | Individual Mobility Grants applications received 1 246; funded 286. |
| --- | --- |

—

Individual Mobility Grants applications received 1 246; funded 286.

Management of activities of Tempus covers the standard functions of contract management, desk monitoring and overall support to projects in progress. 1 149 annual grants were issued to run Tempus projects and 255 reports were assessed. Several hundred Tempus projects received support and advice.

Source:Information provided by the Foundation.

Table 2

European Training Foundation — Implementation of the budget for the 2003 financial year

| (million euro) |
| --- |
| Revenue | Expenditure |
| Source of revenue | Revenue entered in the final budget for the financial year | Revenue received | Allocation of expenditure | Final budget appropriations | Appropriations carried over from the previous financial year | Appropriations available |
| entered | committed | paid | carried over | cancelled | commitments outstanding | paid | cancelled | Appropriations | committed | paid | carried over | cancelled |
| Community subsidies | 17,2 | 18,1 | Title I
  Staff | 11,2 | 11,1 | 10,8 | 0,3 | 0,1 | 0,2 | 0,2 | 0,0 | 11,4 | 11,3 | 11,0 | 0,3 | 0,1 |
| Other subsidies | 0,0 | 0,5 | Title II
  Administration | 1,4 | 1,4 | 1,1 | 0,3 | 0,0 | 0,6 | 0,5 | 0,1 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,3 | 0,1 |
| Other revenue | (1) | 0,0 | Title III
  Operating activities | 4,6 | 4,5 | 3,4 | 1,1 | 0,1 | 2,6 | 2,3 | 0,3 | 7,2 | 7,1 | 5,7 | 1,1 | 0,4 |
| | | | Earmaked revenues (1) | 0,5 | 0,5 | 0,2 | 0,3 | 0,0 | 0,3 | 0,3 | 0,0 | 0,8 | 0,5 | 0,5 | 0,3 | 0,0 |
| Total | 17,2 | 18,6 | Total | 17,7 | 17,5 | 15,5 | 2,0 | 0,2 | 3,7 | 3,3 | 0,4 | 21,4 | 20,9 | 18,8 | 2,0 | 0,6 |
| NB:Any discrepancies in totals are due to the effects of rounding.

  Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the data supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts. |

(million euro)

Revenue

Expenditure

Source of revenue

Revenue entered in the final budget for the financial year

Revenue received

Allocation of expenditure

Final budget appropriations

Appropriations carried over from the previous financial year

Appropriations available

entered

committed

paid

carried over

cancelled

commitments outstanding

paid

cancelled

Appropriations

committed

paid

carried over

cancelled

Community subsidies

17,2

18,1

Title I

Staff

11,2

11,1

10,8

0,3

0,1

0,2

0,2

0,0

11,4

11,3

11,0

0,3

0,1

Other subsidies

0,0

0,5

Title II

Administration

1,4

1,4

1,1

0,3

0,0

0,6

0,5

0,1

2,0

2,0

1,6

0,3

0,1

Other revenue

(1)

0,0

Title III

Operating activities

4,6

4,5

3,4

1,1

0,1

2,6

2,3

0,3

7,2

7,1

5,7

1,1

0,4

Earmaked revenues (1)

0,5

0,5

0,2

0,3

0,0

0,3

0,3

0,0

0,8

0,5

0,5

0,3

0,0

Total

17,2

18,6

Total

17,7

17,5

15,5

2,0

0,2

3,7

3,3

0,4

21,4

20,9

18,8

2,0

0,6

NB:Any discrepancies in totals are due to the effects of rounding.

Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the data supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts.

Table 3

European Training Foundation — Revenue and expenditure account for the financial years 2003 and 2002 (2)

| (1000 euro) |
| --- |
| | 2003 | 2002 |
| Revenue |
| Commission subsidies | 18 100 | 13 179 |
| Other donors | 523 | — |
| Miscellaneous revenue | 17 | 23 |
| Financial revenue | — | 140 |
| Total revenue (a) | 18 640 | 13 342 |
| Expenditure |
| Staff — Title I of the budget |
| Payments | 10 771 | 10 153 |
| Appropriations carried over | 329 | 215 |
| Administration — Title II of the budget |
| Payments | 1 076 | 805 |
| Appropriations carried over | 310 | 559 |
| Operating activities — Title III of the budget |
| Payments | 3 396 | 2 307 |
| Appropriations carried over | 1 087 | 2 591 |
| Earmarked revenues |
| Payments | 237 | — |
| Appropriations carried over | 286 | — |
| Total expenditure (b) | 17 492 | 16 631 |
| Outturn for the financial year(a – b) | 1 148 | –3 289 |
| Balance carried over from the previous financial year | –2 155 | 4 055 |
| Appropriations carried over and cancelled | 375 | 424 |
| Reimbursements to the Commission | – 703 | –3 352 |
| Exchange-rate differences | 17 | 6 |
| Balance for the financial year | –1 318 | –2 155 |
| Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the date supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts. |

(1000 euro)

2003

2002

Revenue

Commission subsidies

18 100

13 179

Other donors

523

—

Miscellaneous revenue

17

23

Financial revenue

—

140

Total revenue (a)

18 640

13 342

Expenditure

Staff — Title I of the budget

Payments

10 771

10 153

Appropriations carried over

329

215

Administration — Title II of the budget

Payments

1 076

805

Appropriations carried over

310

559

Operating activities — Title III of the budget

Payments

3 396

2 307

Appropriations carried over

1 087

2 591

Earmarked revenues

Payments

237

—

Appropriations carried over

286

—

Total expenditure (b)

17 492

16 631

Outturn for the financial year(a – b)

1 148

–3 289

Balance carried over from the previous financial year

–2 155

4 055

Appropriations carried over and cancelled

375

424

Reimbursements to the Commission

– 703

–3 352

Exchange-rate differences

17

6

Balance for the financial year

–1 318

–2 155

Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the date supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts.

Table 4

European Training Foundation — Balance sheet at 31 December 2003 and 31 December 2002 (3)

| (1000 euro) |
| --- |
| Assets | 2003 | 2002 | Liabilities | 2003 | 2002 |
| Intangible fixed assets
   (4) | | | Fixed capital | | |
| Occupational rights | 5 000 | 5 000 | Own capital | 3 852 | 4 059 |
| Software licences | 146 | — | Balance for the financial year | –1 318 | –2 155 |
| Depreciation | –1 611 | –1 333 | Subtotal | 2 534 | 1 904 |
| Subtotal | 3 535 | 3 667 | Current liabilities | | |
| Tangible fixed assets | | | Automatic carry-overs of appropriations | 1 726 | 3 366 |
| Equipment and furniture | 273 | 618 | Automatic carry-overs of earmarked revenues | 286 | 273 |
| Computer equipment | 1 438 | 1 235 | Other contributors | 30 | 85 |
| Depreciation | –1 444 | –1 521 | Sundry accounts payable | 1 | 28 |
| Subtotal | 267 | 332 | Deferred revenue | 83 | 3 537 |
| Stocks | | | Subtotal | 2 126 | 7 289 |
| Office equipment | 50 | 60 | | | |
| Subtotal | 50 | 60 | | | |
| Current assets | | | | | |
| Commission subsidy receivable | 0 | 3 366 | | | |
| Other advances | 4 | 2 | | | |
| Recovery orders | 43 | 171 | | | |
| Sundry accounts receivable | 39 | 30 | | | |
| Subtotal | 86 | 3 569 | | | |
| Cash accounts | | | | | |
| Bank accounts | 719 | 1 524 | | | |
| Imprest account | 3 | 41 | | | |
| Subtotal | 722 | 1 565 | | | |
| Total | 4 660 | 9 193 | Total | 4 660 | 9 193 |
| Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the date supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts. |

(1000 euro)

Assets

2003

2002

Liabilities

2003

2002

Intangible fixed assets
   (4)

Fixed capital

Occupational rights

5 000

5 000

Own capital

3 852

4 059

Software licences

146

—

Balance for the financial year

–1 318

–2 155

Depreciation

–1 611

–1 333

Subtotal

2 534

1 904

Subtotal

3 535

3 667

Current liabilities

Tangible fixed assets

Automatic carry-overs of appropriations

1 726

3 366

Equipment and furniture

273

618

Automatic carry-overs of earmarked revenues

286

273

Computer equipment

1 438

1 235

Other contributors

30

85

Depreciation

–1 444

–1 521

Sundry accounts payable

1

28

Subtotal

267

332

Deferred revenue

83

3 537

Stocks

Subtotal

2 126

7 289

Office equipment

50

60

Subtotal

50

60

Current assets

Commission subsidy receivable

0

3 366

Other advances

4

2

Recovery orders

43

171

Sundry accounts receivable

39

30

Subtotal

86

3 569

Cash accounts

Bank accounts

719

1 524

Imprest account

3

41

Subtotal

722

1 565

Total

4 660

9 193

Total

4 660

9 193

Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the date supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts.

---

(1)  Earmarked revenues have not been included in the budget (see paragraph 8 of the report).

NB:Any discrepancies in totals are due to the effects of rounding.

Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the data supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts.

(2)  The revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet only take account of the Foundation's specific activities: they do not include programmes managed on behalf of the Commission.

Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the date supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts.

(3)  The revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet only take account of the Foundation's specific activities: they don't include programmes managed on behalf of the Commission.

(4)  The Foundation paid to the owner of its building five millions euros for its renovation. This payment gives the Foundation the right to use the building for one euro per year during 30 years from 1995 on. This item has been taken into account for the first time in 2003. The figure for year 2002 has been restated accordingly.

Source:Foundation data. This table summarise the date supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts.

---

THE FOUNDATION'S REPLIES

| 7. | At the time the Annual Accounts for 2003 were first drawn up, it was not clear yet under which rules the Tempus conventions had to be reported in the budget and in other financial statements. ETF decided to report about these amounts in detail in an annex, while coming to a clear agreement with the Commission services on the presentation of accounts 2005.
  A meeting of agencies' accountants organised by the Commission and held on 11 June 2004 in Brussels gave concrete guidance on new accounting methodologies to apply to funds managed on behalf of the Commission which will be followed as of first January 2005 onwards. |
| --- | --- |

7.

At the time the Annual Accounts for 2003 were first drawn up, it was not clear yet under which rules the Tempus conventions had to be reported in the budget and in other financial statements. ETF decided to report about these amounts in detail in an annex, while coming to a clear agreement with the Commission services on the presentation of accounts 2005.

A meeting of agencies' accountants organised by the Commission and held on 11 June 2004 in Brussels gave concrete guidance on new accounting methodologies to apply to funds managed on behalf of the Commission which will be followed as of first January 2005 onwards.

| 8. | ETF takes note of the Court’s remark. From 2004 onward, any donation will be integrated into an amended budget which will be submitted for approval to the Governing Board and subsequently published. |
| --- | --- |

8.

ETF takes note of the Court’s remark. From 2004 onward, any donation will be integrated into an amended budget which will be submitted for approval to the Governing Board and subsequently published.

| 9. | ETF takes note of the Court’s remark. A second occurrence happened in January 2004 when the first instalment of ETF 2004 subvention could not be paid to ETF in time. ETF had again to rely on a temporary transfer out of Tempus funds to overcome an urgent financial shortfall.
  Learning from the previous occurrence, ETF formally informed the Commission and the chairman of the Governing Board through a letter dated 16 January 2004. Since that date, an arrangement has been agreed with the Commission to reduce the risk that such situations arise in the future. |
| --- | --- |

9.

ETF takes note of the Court’s remark. A second occurrence happened in January 2004 when the first instalment of ETF 2004 subvention could not be paid to ETF in time. ETF had again to rely on a temporary transfer out of Tempus funds to overcome an urgent financial shortfall.

Learning from the previous occurrence, ETF formally informed the Commission and the chairman of the Governing Board through a letter dated 16 January 2004. Since that date, an arrangement has been agreed with the Commission to reduce the risk that such situations arise in the future.

| 10. | The Accounting Officer validated the systems with a note in June 2004. |
| --- | --- |

10.

The Accounting Officer validated the systems with a note in June 2004.

| 11. | Since April 2004, applications are stored in a computerised database, where the screening of candidates against eligibility criteria is recorded. Eligible candidates are then assessed independently by each of the members of the selection committee, against pre-defined criteria. The shortlist of the candidates to be interviewed is the result of the average score of these independent assessments. Also the performance of interviewed candidates is scored independently by each member of the selection committee, against pre-defined criteria. A more systematic and comprehensive documentation of all steps is kept on file. |
| --- | --- |

11.

Since April 2004, applications are stored in a computerised database, where the screening of candidates against eligibility criteria is recorded. Eligible candidates are then assessed independently by each of the members of the selection committee, against pre-defined criteria. The shortlist of the candidates to be interviewed is the result of the average score of these independent assessments. Also the performance of interviewed candidates is scored independently by each member of the selection committee, against pre-defined criteria. A more systematic and comprehensive documentation of all steps is kept on file.

---