alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Report of HERITAGE-CRYSTAL CLEAN, INC. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 14, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Chalhoub, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
      July 25, 2008
              By:
      /s/
      Joseph ChalhoubJoseph
      ChalhoubPresident,
      CEO and Director — Principal Executive
Officer
Clear All

        22 August 2022    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet Conducts Undersea Warfare Exercise                 
                Commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet conducted an undersea warfare exercise in the Atlantic Ocean, Aug. 13-15.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Partners of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74212) and on Form S-3 (File Nos.333-106195 and 333-106239) of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) of our reports dated February 28, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. as ofDecember 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ capital and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31,2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. 

KPMG LLP 

Houston, Texas 

March 1, 2007
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 62 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
(105 So. 697)

#### Ex parte Edna NARO.

(6 Div. 506.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 15, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Richard H. Dries, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Edna Naro for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Naro v. State, 105 So. 696. Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. X, and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
sce o3 RI? u7

ra

7 GLORETARIAT

CFO. Ur bee

November 23, 2005

BY EMAIL

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: — Certification: New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.
Submission #05.213 (Listing of Additional Strike Prices for the
Gold, Copper, Silver and Natural Gas Option Contracts)

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

Pursuant to COMEX Rule 15.03(c), COMEX Rule 16.03, COMEX Rule 17.04 and
NYMEX Rule 300.20, the President of the New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“Exchange”)
has directed that additional strike prices be added for certain contract months in the Gold,
Copper, Silver and Natural Gas option contracts as detailed below:

(A) On November 22, 2005, the Exchange added a call and a put:

1. atthe strike price of 600 for the January 2006 contract month of the Gold
option contract;

2. atthe strike price of 14200 for the March 2006 contract month of the
Natural Gas option contract;

3. atthe strike price of 1025 for the March 2006 contract month of the Silver
option contract;

4. at the strike price of 570 for the April 2006 contract month of the Gold
option contract;
(B) On November 23, 2005, the Exchange added a call and a put:

5. at the strike price of 1250 for the January 2006 contract month of the
Silver option contract;


CFTC Commissioners
November 23, 2005
Page 2

6. atthe strike price of 172 for the March 2006 contract month of the Copper
option contract;

7. atthe strike price of 1250 for the July 2006 contract month of the Silver
option contract; and

8. at the strike price of 650 for the October 2006 contract month of the Gold
option contract.

Pursuant to the terms of COMEX Rule 15.03(c), COMEX Rule 16.03, COMEX Rule
17.04 and NYMEX Rule 300.20, the strike prices noted above are in increments that are
consistent with the pricing for the underlying futures contract. COMEX Rule 15.03(c), COMEX
Rule 16.03, COMEX Rule 17.04 and NYMEX Rule 300.20 permit such directed strike prices to
be effective upon adoption, provided that notice to the CFTC is given within three business days
of the strike price listing.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact the undersigned
at (212) 299-2207.

Very truly yours,

Brian Regan
Vice President & Counsel

ce: Christopher K. Bowen
George Henderson
Michael Campanelli
Donna Talamo
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains  unaudited summary financial  information  extracted from
Evans & Sutherland's  consolidated  financial  statements as of and for the year
ended  December  27, 1996 and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to such
statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0000276283
<NAME>                             EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1996
<CASH>                                          16,521
<SECURITIES>                                    46,454
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                       563
<INVENTORY>                                     20,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,213
<PP&E>                                         115,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,290
<BONDS>                                         18,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,811
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,891
<SALES>                                        130,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,564
<CGS>                                           65,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,029
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,677
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,352
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12<F1>
        

<FN>
F1 - Restated to reflect the adoption of Statement of Financial  Accounting 
Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share."
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 62 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 033-27783) and Amendment No. 536 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The
      Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for
      the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

               /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 20, 2019
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Roughneck Supplies, Inc. for the                quarter ended August 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended August 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of Roughneck Supplies,                Inc.. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Travis McPhee                                                             |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Travis                McPhee                                                                       |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  October                15, 2007                                                                    |
## Breadcrumb

-  Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI) 

#           About        

-  Home 
-  Budget 
-  Strategic Planning & Performance 
-  Program Book 
-  Links 
-  Glossary 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

The Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI) secures fiscal resources needed for the USGS to perform its scientific mission goals, facilitates information sharing internally and externally, and provides in-depth analysis of budget and program performance data for the USGS to understand, anticipate, and respond to shifts in social and political paradigms.

link

####                 What We Do              

The Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI) aligns USGS issues, strategies, and funding with the strategic planning, priorities, and policy of the Administration, Department of the Interior, and Congress.

link

####   What We Do

The Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI) aligns USGS issues, strategies, and funding with the strategic planning, priorities, and policy of the Administration, Department of the Interior, and Congress.

Learn More

link

####                 A message from Associate Director Anne Barrett              

Welcome to the Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

link

####   A message from Associate Director Anne Barrett

Welcome to the Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

Learn More
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 8 of 8
**Exhibit23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Board of Directors

 

INVESTools Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatement (Registration No. 333-118330) on Form S-8 of INVESTools Inc. of ourreport dated March 31, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of INVESTools Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’(deficit)/equity, comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financialstatement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2004, AnnualReport on Form 10-K of INVESTools Inc.

 

Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial AccountancyStandards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, on January 1,2003, and the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets on January 1, 2002. Our report dated March 31,2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the consolidatedbalance sheet as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year periodended December 31, 2003, have been restated.  Additionally, the accompanying financialstatement schedule as of December 31, 2003, and for each of the yearsin the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, has been restated.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP         |   |
|----------------------|--------|
| KPMG LLP             |
| Salt Lake City, Utah |
| March 31, 2005  |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 32 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 32 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul G. Van Wagenen, certify that:

I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pogo Producing Company (the "Company");

Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The
Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



The
Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the Audit
Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
February 24, 2004

| |  | /S/ PAUL G. VAN WAGENENPaul G. Van Wagenen
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    OF AMBER RESOURCES COMPANY OF COLORADO
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin K. Nanke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Amber Resources Company
of Colorado;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2007


/s/  Kevin K. Nanke
Kevin K. Nanke
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of INVESTools Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005,  as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee K.Barba, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  thatthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company andthat the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 
|   |   | /s/ LEE  K. BARBA   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Lee K. Barba             |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |   | March 6,  2006           |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Anthony Martin, Appellant, v Warden, Ossining Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered February 14, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner, a New York parolee, had his parole revoked based on a parole violation report prepared by a New Jersey parole officer who was supervising the petitioner’s parole in New Jersey.

*135The record amply supports the Hearing Officer’s finding that the State of New Jersey had an established and firm policy of refusing to allow its supervising parole officers to travel to a sending State for parole revocation hearings and that the petitioner refused to take advantage of the opportunity to submit interrogatories to the New Jersey officer. Under these circumstances, the Hearing Officer properly found that "good cause” existed for dispensing with the production of the New Jersey parole officer and "not allowing confrontation” *(People ex rel. McGee v Walters,*62 NY2d 317, 321-323; *Morrissey v Brewer,*408 US 471, 489).

We have examined the petitioner’s remaining argument and find it to be without merit *(see, People ex rel. McGee v Walters, supra,*at 320-321). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Edward Baker, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), dated December 8, 1987, granting the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 to set aside the verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for sentencing.

The Supreme Court erred in setting aside the verdict on the basis of the trial court’s unrequested instruction on the defendant’s failure to testify *(see, People v McLucas,*15 NY2d 167). While the trial court acted improperly in giving such a charge *(see, People v Koberstein,*66 NY2d 989; *People v Ogle,*142 AD2d 608; *People v Concepcion,*128 AD2d 887), we find that reversal of the judgment of conviction is not warranted under the circumstances of this case. The charge was "consistent in substance with the intent of the statute” *(People v Gonzalez,*72 AD2d 508), and not so extensive as to prejudicially draw the jury’s attention to the issue *(People v Brown,*150 AD2d 472; *People v Davidson,*150 AD2d 717). In light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to his conviction *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237; *People v Brown, supra; People v Malcolm,*143 AD2d 1049). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.