alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004307EN.01001301.xml

| 11.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/13

---

COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2004/C 307/05)

| Document | Part | Date | Title |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COM(2004) 533 | | 2.8.2004 | Report from the Commission – Research and technological development activities of the European Union 2003 Annual Report |
| COM(2004) 536 | | 29.7.2004 | Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament – Annual Report 2004 on EC development policy and external assistance |
| COM(2004) 548 | | 9.8.2004 | Recommendation for a Council Decision on the opening of the negotiations on an agreement concerning monetary relations with the Principality of Andorra |
| COM(2004) 562 | | 17.8.2004 | Green Paper on mutual recognition of non-custodial pre-trial supervision measures |
| COM(2004) 588 | | 10.9.2004 | Report from the Commission to the Council on the application of Annex X to the Staff Regulations (Council Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 3019/87 of 5 October 1987) year 2003 |

Document

Part

Date

Title

COM(2004) 533

2.8.2004

Report from the Commission – Research and technological development activities of the European Union 2003 Annual Report

COM(2004) 536

29.7.2004

Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament – Annual Report 2004 on EC development policy and external assistance

COM(2004) 548

9.8.2004

Recommendation for a Council Decision on the opening of the negotiations on an agreement concerning monetary relations with the Principality of Andorra

COM(2004) 562

17.8.2004

Green Paper on mutual recognition of non-custodial pre-trial supervision measures

COM(2004) 588

10.9.2004

Report from the Commission to the Council on the application of Annex X to the Staff Regulations (Council Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 3019/87 of 5 October 1987) year 2003

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7757
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LESTER MATTHEW PATTERSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-94-51, CA-95-139-5-BO) Submitted: August 19, 1997 Decided: September 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lester Matthew Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Talore Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). After final judgment, a plaintiff may amend his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) only with leave of court after the judgment has been set aside under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 or 60(b). Figgie Int'l Inc. v. Miller , 966 F.2d 1178, 1179 (7th Cir. 1992). We review denial of leave for abuse of discretion. Id. As we find no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision here, weaffirm his judgment. We grant Appellant's motion to file a supplemental informal brief, but deny Appellant's motions for production of documents, to hold the appeal in abeyance to amend the appellate record, and to stay the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 22-12 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 9 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2574** 

In R e: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. (1:14

- cv - 00827

- LMB

- TCB)

Submitted : July 15, 2016 Decided: July 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Janice Wolk Grenadier, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Janice Wolk Grenadier petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order requiring the district court judge to recuse herself . We conclude that Grenadier is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in ext raordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U .S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought.
In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. Because Grenadier essentially seeks to reopen her case, t he relief sought is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                    SPIEGEL, INC.

                               LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                  December 28, 1996

Name of Corporation                                        Incorporated In
-----------------------------------------------           -----------------

Catalog 1, Inc.                                            Delaware

Distribution Fulfillment Services, Inc.                    Delaware

Eddie Bauer, Inc.                                          Delaware

Eddie Bauer of Canada, Inc. (1)                            Canada

Eddie Bauer International, Inc. (1)                        Delaware

Equity Cash Benefit Insurance Agency, Inc.                 Illinois

Equity Cash Benefit Insurance Agency, Inc.                 Nevada

First Consumers National Bank                              Federal Charter

For You, Inc.                                              Delaware

Hampton Realty Acquisition Corporation (2)                 Delaware

Kids Stores, Inc.                                          Delaware

Newport News, Inc. (formerly New Hampton, Inc.)            Delaware

S.I. Reinsurance Limited                                   Turks & Caicos

Spiegel Acceptance Corporation                             Delaware

Spiegel Credit Corporation II                              Delaware

Spiegel Credit Corporation III                             Delaware
    
Spiegel International, Inc.                                Delaware

Spiegel Management Group, Inc.                             Delaware

Spiegel of Philadelphia, Inc.                              Pennsylvania

Spiegel Properties Inc.                                    Delaware

Spiegel Publishing Company                                 Illinois

Spiegel Teleservice, Inc.                                  Illinois

Spiegel Teleservice, Inc.                                  Nevada

Together Retail U.S.A., Inc.                               Delaware

Ultimate Outlet Inc.                                       Delaware


(1) Wholly-owned subsidiary of Eddie Bauer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of 
    Spiegel, Inc.  

(2) Wholly-owned subsidiary of Newport News, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary 
    of Spiegel, Inc.


                                          54
Order entered February 18, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01569
- CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V. JOHN M. CHERRY, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. F10
- 72386



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS the State’s February 10, 2014 motion to supplement the record

. We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing copies of the pass slips dated: March 5, 2013; April 9, 2013; April 30, 2013; May 9, 2013; June 12, 2013; June 27, 2013; July 10, 2013; August 16, 2013; and September 13, 2013.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsi mmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.2


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Kevin K. Nanke certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Amber Resources
Company of Colorado;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

         (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date:  September 22, 2004


/s/ Kevin K. Nanke
Kevin K. Nanke
Chief Financial Officer
Catalyst Paper Corporation – List of Subsidiaries




Catalyst Paper Holdings Inc.


Catalyst Paper (Snowflake) Inc.


Catalyst Paper Energy Holdings Inc.


Catalyst Paper Recycling Inc.


Catalyst Pulp Operations Limited


Catalyst Pulp and Paper Sales Inc.


Catalyst Pulp Sales Inc.


Catalyst Paper (USA) Inc.


Catalyst Paper Finance Limited


Catalyst Paper (general partnership)


The Apache Railway Company


Pacifica Poplars Ltd.


Pacifica Poplars Inc.


Pacifica Papers U.S. Inc.


Pacifica Papers Sales Inc.


Export Sales Company Limited


Crofton Pulp and Paper Limited


468327 B.C. Ltd.


British Columbia Forest Products Limited


NSC Holdings (Philippines) Inc.


NSC Holdings (Barbados) Limited


Catalyst Paper Services (Hungary) LLC


Powell River Energy Inc.


Elk Falls Pulp and Paper Limited


3264904 Canada Limited


0606890 B.C. Ltd


3744809 Canada Inc.


Echelon Paper Corporation (a British Columbia company)


Echelon Paper Corporation (a CBCA corporation)


Elk Falls Forest Industries Limited
#### Lois Kern, Appellant, v DePaul Mental Health Services, Inc., Respondent.

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim under Labor Law § 740, the "whistleblower statute”, in its entirety. Under any reasonable reading of the statute and under any view of the facts of this case, defendant’s alleged violations of law, if any, did not create and present a substantial and specific danger to the public health and safety (Labor Law § 740 [2]; *see, Vella v United Cerebral Palsy,*141 Mise 2d 976, 978; *see also,*Givens, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 30, Labor Law § 740, at 546-547). Defendant’s alleged illegalities consisted, at most, of neglect of a certain patient, failure to report an incident of patient neglect, improper deletion of an entry concerning such incident, and an improper attempt to persuade plaintiff to change her entry to delete reference to the incident. Defendant’s alleged wrongdoing may have presented a danger to the health or safety of the individual patient, but *958did not threaten the health or safety of the public at large. (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 52004SC0593 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004SC0593

**Preliminary draft amending budget No 7 to the budget for 2004 - General statement of revenue /* SEC/2004/0593 final */ **

*

*

PRELIMINARY DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET No 7 TO THE BUDGET FOR 2004 - GENERAL STATEMENT OF REVENUE

(presented by the Commission)

Having regard to:

- the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 272 thereof,

- the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 177 thereof,

- the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [1], and in particular Articles 15 and 37 thereof,

[1] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

The European Commission hereby presents to the budgetary authority the preliminary draft amending budget No 7 to the 2004 budget for the reasons set out in the explanatory memorandum.

***

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

The present Preliminary Draft Amending Budget (PDAB) aims at budgeting the surplus resulting from the implementation of the budget year 2003. As provided for in the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2], under Article 15, it is the only subject of this PDAB and it is submitted within 15 days following the submission of the provisional accounts, which took place on 1 May 2004.

[2] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, P. 1.

1. REVENUE

1.1. Balance of budget 2003

The implementation of the budget year 2003 shows a surplus of EUR 5 469 843 705,65 shared between a component resulting from an over-registering in revenue (+EUR 850 023 235,85), an under-spending in expenditure (+EUR 4 728 809 433,65) and a negative balance of monetary exchange (-EUR 108 988 963,62).

The over-registering of revenue can be analysed by title as follows:

>TABLE POSITION>

The under-spending of payment appropriations in 2003 can be analysed by heading of the Financial perspective as follows.

>TABLE POSITION>

- not including payment appropriations corresponding to assigned revenue.

This budgeting of the surplus will diminish accordingly the global contribution of the Member States to the financing of the EU Budget. However, the effect by Member State of this global decrease is also influenced by the updated own resources forecast including the updated amount of the UK correction and the budgeting of the surplus of the guarantee fund for external loans. This will be the subject of a separate Preliminary Draft Amending Budget, to be presented by the Commission at the end of May, which is expected to change further the amounts of the contributions by country.
## Breadcrumb

-  Advanced Research Computing (ARC) 

#           Partners        

-  Home 
-  Science Stories 
-  USGS Supercomputers 
-  Publications 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 

#### DOE Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)

#### Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE)

#### Rocky Mountain Advanced Computing Consortium (RMACC)

#### University of Colorado Boulder - Research Computing
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.29


 


	
  

  	
  Albert E. Smith

  Vice Chairman

  



 


 


November 14, 2005


 


Li-San Hwang


Chairman


Tetra Tech, Inc.


3475 E. Foothill Boulevard


Pasadena, California 91107


 


Dear Li-San:


 


On behalf of the Board of
Directors, I want to thank you for your invaluable service to Tetra Tech as its
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since the formation of the Company. We are
pleased that you have agreed to serve as Chairman until the 2006 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders and that you will remain an employee and provide services to
the Company on an as-needed basis. The following sets forth the terms of your
arrangement with the Company, as approved by the Board of Directors today:


 


•                  Title. You have been
granted the honorary title of Chairman Emeritus of Tetra Tech, Inc. for
life.


 


•                  Retainer. As a
retainer for your services, the Company will make a one-time payment to you in
the amount of your base salary of $500,000. One-half of the payment will be
made following your retirement as Chairman at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
scheduled for March 6, 2006, and the balance will be paid on the first
anniversary of the initial payment.


 


•                  Stock Options. As an
employee, your stock options will continue to vest in accordance with their
terms.


 


•                  Medical Coverage.
The Company will provide post-retirement medical coverage for you and your
wife.


 


 


3475 East Foothill Boulevard, Pasadena, CA
91107


Tel 626.470.2470 Fax 626.470.2670


 





















 


•                  Auto Lease. The
Company will continue to make payments on the lease for your automobile until the
expiration of the lease term in November 2008.


 


Please indicate your
agreement with and acceptance of the terms of this letter by signing a copy in
the space provided below and returning it to me at your earliest convenience.
We look forward to your continuing contributions to Tetra Tech’s growth and
success.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Albert E. Smith

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Albert E. Smith

  	
   

  
	
  Vice Chairman

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Li-San
  Hwang

  	
   

  	
  Dec. 6, 2005

  	
   

  
	
  Li-San Hwang

  	
  Date

  



 


2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        12,962,626
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        3,940,194
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          4,054,026
<EQUITIES>                                   3,225,061
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              26,929,625
<CASH>                                       1,146,317
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,404,432
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,531,714
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            698,764
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       315,567
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,764,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,404,432
<PREMIUMS>                                  11,169,243
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,344,815
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             182,734
<OTHER-INCOME>                               3,133,609
<BENEFITS>                                   6,070,954
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  5,727,802
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           362,997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,668,648
<INCOME-TAX>                                   967,354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,701,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,701,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               1,345,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          6,074,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (3,000)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           4,479,000
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             1,413,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              1,524,000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Order entere(l October 18, 2012

In The

ottrt of Z1ppca1

jfifti itrIct of at at1a

No. 05-12-00277-CV

PEDRO GONZALEZ & MARIA GOMEZ, ET AL., Appellants

V.

VATR CONSTRUCTION LLC & ALL

AMERICAN ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION, Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-09360-M

ORDER

The Court has before it appellants’ October 12. 2012 unopposed motion for extension of

time to file appellants reply brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that any

reply brief be filed by November 14, 2012.

MOLLY F’

JUSTICE