alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service

7 CFR Parts 1773

RIN 0572-AB62


Policy on Audits of RUS Borrowers; Generally Accepted Government 
Auditing Standards (GAGAS)

AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is proposing to amend its 
regulations to include in its audit requirements for electric and 
telecommunications borrowers recent amendments to the Generally 
Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) issued by the Government 
Accounting Office (GAO) and to make other minor changes and 
corrections.
    In the final rule section of this Federal Register, RUS is 
publishing this action as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because RUS views this as a non-controversial action and anticipates no 
adverse comments. If no adverse comments are received in response to 
the direct final rule, no further action will be taken on this proposed 
rule and the action will become effective at the time specified in the 
direct final rule. If RUS receives adverse comments, a timely document 
will be published withdrawing the direct final rule and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this proposed 
action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received on or before 
June 20, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Submit adverse comments or notice of intent to submit 
adverse comments to F. Lamont Heppe, Jr., Director, Program Development 
and Regulatory Analysis, Staff, Rural Utilities Service, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., STOP 1522, 
Washington, DC 20250-1522. RUS requests a signed original and three 
copies of all comments (7 CFR 1700.4). All comments received will be 
made available for public inspection at room 4030, South Building, 
Washington, DC, between the 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. (7 CFR part 1.27(b)).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Annan, Chief, Technical 
Accounting and Auditing Staff, Program Accounting Services Division, 
Rural Utilities Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 
Independence Ave., SW., STOP 1523, Washington, DC 20250-1523. 
Telephone: 202-720-5227.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the Supplementary Information provided 
in the direct final rule located in the final rule section of this 
Federal Register for the applicable supplementary information on this 
action.

    Dated: May 8, 2001.
Blaine D. Stockton,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 01-12128 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 2 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 3 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 4 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 5 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 6 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 7 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 8 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 9 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 10 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 11 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 12 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 13 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 14 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 15 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 16 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 17 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 18 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 19 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 20 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 21 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 22 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 23 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 24 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 25 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 26 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 27 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 28 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 29 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 30 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 31 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 32 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 30-3 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 33 of 33
143 So. 925

#### PROTECTIVE LIFE INS. CO. v. Katie Violet HARMON.

6 Div. 162.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 4, 1932.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
January 12, 2006 Ort. uF Tc SEER ETA!

Via E-Mail

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 06.09 — Notification of
Amendments to NYMEX Division Rule 9.24(E), Original Margin
Depositories and Originators of Letters of Credit.

Dear Ms. Jean Webb:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“NYMEX” or the “Exchange”) hereby notifies
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) of amendments to NYMEX Division
Rule 9.24(E), Original Margin Depositories and Originators of Letters of Credit.

Effective January 17, 2006, the amendments to Rule 9.24(E) increase the maximum
dollar value of Letters of Credit to $500 million, and retains the percentage basis at 10%. The
amendments also increase the collateralized maximum to $600 million. Pursuant to Section
5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby
certifies that the new amendments comply with the Act, including regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please feel free to contact Arthur
McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance and Risk Management, at (212) 299-2928, or
Joseph Sanguedolce, Senior Director, Financial Surveillance, at (212) 299-2855.

Very truly yours,

Thomas F. LaSala
Senior Vice President
Compliance and Risk Management

Attachments
ce: Brian Regan
Nancy Minett


NYMEX Rule 9.24, Original Margin Depositories and Originators of Letters of Credit
(Deletions are in bold/strikethrough, and additions in bold/underlined)

(E) No approved original margin depository or issuer of a letter of credit may commit, with
tespect to Exchange contracts, more than the lesser of ten percent (10%) of its capital and surplus
or $206 500 million, provided, however, that an issuer may issue letters of credit up to $306 600
million, if such issuer establishes, to the satisfaction of the Exchange, an account at another
financial institution and deposits in such account, for the benefit of the Exchange, collateral in
the form of U.S. Government obligations of maturities of less than ten (10) years valued at 95% -
of par value, for the excess over $200 500 million. Such collateral shall be deemed to secure any
and all obligations of such issuer under letters of credit issued by the issuer in favor of the
Exchange. The Board of Directors, upon the application of an issuer of letters of credit, may
grant a waiver of the $308 600 million ceiling, upon such terms and conditions as it deems
appropriate.
(LOGO) Provident Bank
One East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Phone: (513) 579-2000

Report of Management

We, as members of management of The Provident Bank (Provident),  are responsible
for complying with the minimum servicing  standards as set forth in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers  (USAP).  We are  also  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining
effective  internal  control  over  compliance  with  these  standards.  We have
performed an  evaluation of Provident's compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1999 and for the year then
ended.  Based on this evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended December
31,  1999,  Provident  complied,  in all  material  respects,  with the  minimum
servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same  period,  Provident  had in effect a  fidelity  bond and
errors and  omissions  policy in the  amount of $  25,000,000  and  $10,000,000,
respectively.


Richard Gravino
Executive Vice President
Consumer Finance

Joseph Smith II
Senior Vice President
National Servicing Operations

March 31, 2000


Member FDIC
Equal Housing Lender
Case 1:07-cv-01521-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-01521-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of KnuSaga Corporation ("KnuSaga") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James G. Musser,
President, Chief Executive Officer of KnuSaga and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the
          financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  James G. Musser
---------------------------
     James G. Musser
     Chief Executive Officer

November 24, 2004
*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 4, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

ANGELA JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 07-6172

v. (W.D. Oklahoma)

UNITY HEALTH CENTER, INC.;

MICHAEL SPEARS, individually and

in his capacity as Human Resource

Director at Unity Health Center, Inc.;

MELANIE McLAUGHLIN,

individually and in her official

capacity as Supervisor at Unity Health

Center, Inc.,

Defendants - Appellees.

(D.C. No. 05-CV-1022-T)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination
-2-

of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff and appellant Angela Jones brought this action alleging a violation

of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, the

Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, and

Oklahoma tort law. In an order dated June 27, 2007, the district court dismissed

for lack of jurisdiction Jones’ ADA claim based upon the termination of her

employment, awarded summary judgment to defendants on all other ADA and tort

claims, and dismissed with prejudice Jones’ FMLA claims. Additionally, the

district court awarded costs to defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1).

Jones appeals the grant of summary judgment to defendants on her ADA

claims relating to the claimed failure to accommodate her disability and a hostile

work environment, the dismissal of her ADA claim based upon the termination of

her employment, and the district court’s refusal to reverse its award of costs. We

AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the disability/hostile

work environment ADA claims and the dismissal of her ADA termination claim,

for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s order dated June 27,

2007. We AFFIRM the district court’s award of costs, for substantially the

reasons stated in its order dated October 12, 2007.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge
No. 140.

#### J. P. Looney, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*State of Missouri.

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. October 13, 1908. Dismissed with costs on, the authority of counsel for the- plaintiff in error. *Mr. Timothy J. ■ Fell*for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
|   | · | the annual      report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the      information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations. |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 14, 2009 | /s/      Robert E. Mellor                                                                                      |   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Robert E.      MellorChairman of      the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----

|   | · | the annual      report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the      information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations. |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 14, 2009 | /s/      William M. Smartt                                                                                     |   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | William M.      SmarttSenior Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1923 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     December 17, 2020.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1923) entitled ``An Act to amend title 31, United States Code, to 
require the Secretary of the Treasury to mint and issue certain 
circulating collectible coins, and for other purposes.'', do pass with 
the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            At the end, add the following:

SEC. 8. COST.

    No coin or medal minted and issued under this Act, or an amendment 
made by this Act, may be sold at a price such that would result in a 
net cost to the Federal Government.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 1923

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
Doc 

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT 

 

Mahoney v. JJ Weiser

05cv7117

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled action is

reassigned to the calendar of

JUDGE Mukasey

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the

Clerk=s Office of the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned

judge=s initials after the case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice

of assignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 08/22/05

By: Jenny R. Horne

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

 

Data Quality Control 

 Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:05-cv-07117-VM Document 4 Filed 08/22/2005 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CRAIG FASHBAUGH

Vo

Plaintiff,

CONTINENTAL ASSURANCE COMPANY

AND HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants.

Case No. 07-CV-5791

RULE 7.1(a) DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Stephen Harris, an attorney admitted to practice in this Court declares as follows:

Pursuant to Rule 7.1(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned counsel

for Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, a non-governmental corporate party,

certifies that Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company is wholly owned by Hartford Life,

Inc., which is wholly owned by Hartford Holdings, Inc., which is wholly owned by The Hartford

Financial Services Group, Inc., a publicly traded company.

October 23, 2007 By:

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

/s/Stephen Harris

Stephen Harris (N.Y. Bar No. 698807)

One Logan Square

18th & Cherry Streets

Philadelphia, PA 19103-6996

(215) 988-2700

Attorney for Defendants

Continental Assurance Company and

Hartford Life and Accident

Insurance Company

Case 1:07-cv-05791-CM Document 13 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that this document and any attachments have been sent electronically to the

registered participants as notified on the Notice of Electronic Filing, and paper copies will be

sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on this 23ra day of October 2007.

Dated: October 23, 2007 By: /s/Stephen Harris

Stephen Harris (N.Y. Bar No. 698807)

One Logan Square

18th & Cherry Streets

Philadelphia, PA 19103-6996

(215) 988-2700

Attorney for Defendants

Continental Assurance Company and

Hartford Life and Accident

Insurance Company

2

Case 1:07-cv-05791-CM Document 13 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Lai Ling Cheng et al., Plaintiffs, v Modansky Leasing Co., Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Edward J. Murtaugh, Nonparty Respondent-Appellant; Sullivan & Liapakis, P.C., Nonparty Appellant-Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs’ successor attorneys, Sullivan & Liapakis, P.C., appeal on the ground of excessiveness, and the plaintiffs’ prior attorney, Edward Murtaugh, cross-appeals on the ground of inadequacy, from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated July 15, 1986, which, after a hearing, awarded Murtaugh, the attorney who represented the plaintiffs in this matter prior to the commencement of the lawsuit, the principal sum of $108,000, representing 20% of the total attorney’s fee in the underlying lawsuit, and the balance of the fee to Sullivan & Liapakis, P.C. By decision and order of this court dated February 29, 1988, the order and judgment was modified, by reducing the award to Murtaugh to the principal sum of $35,000, calculated on a strict quantum meruit basis *(see, Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co.,*137 AD2d 781). By order dated May 4, 1989, the Court of Appeals reversed the decision and order of this court and remitted the matter here for a recalculation of Murtaugh’s fee based upon a percentage of the recovery *(see, Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co.,*73 NY2d 454).

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The limited issue before this court upon remittitur is whether the award by the Supreme Court constituted an improvident exercise of discretion (4 NY Jur 2d, Appellate Review, § 369; *Matter of Hallgarten,*130 AD2d 749). Under the facts and circumstances of this case, and in view of the quantity and quality of Murtaugh’s services prior to the commencement of the action, we conclude that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in fixing Murtaugh’s fee at 20% of the recovery, or $108,000. Kunzeman, J. P., Rubin, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.