alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(23 Civ. Proc. R. 317.)

#### KRAUSS v. HALLBEIMER et al.

(Superior Court of New York City, Special Term.

May 22, 1893.)

Deposition—Settlement oe Interrogatories—Practice.

Code Civ. Proc. § 891, provides that, unless interrogatories are settled by consent, they must be settled as prescribed in the rules of practice, but said rules make no provision therefor. *Held,*that interrogatories must be settled according to the “course and practice of the court” (Code Civ. Proc. § 4), and therefore an order will not be granted requiring the adverse party to serve cross interrogatories.

Action by Leopold Krauss against Max Hallbeimer and Morris Ginsberg to set aside an assignment. Plaintiff moves for an order directing defendants to serve cross interrogatories, to be annexed to a commission to take testimony of a witness without the state.

Denied.

George Carlton Comstock, for plaintiff.

J. Stuart Ross, for defendants.

McADAM, J.

The practice in regard to the settlement of interrogatories has long since been settled. The Code (section 891) provides that, “unless the interrogatories to be annexed to the commission are settled by consent of the parties, they must be settled upon notice * * * as prescribed by the general rules of practice.” As these rules make no allusion to the subject, the matter is, by force of section 4 of the Code, left to be regulated by the then pre-existing “course and practice of the courts,” which will be found in the several books on practice, as follows:

> “To procure the settlement, serve a copy of the proposed interrogatories on the opposite attorney, with a notice of four days of the time and place at which they will be presented for settlement. The opposite party may propose cross interrogatories, a copy of which must be served two days before the settlement of the interrogatories.” 1 Van Santv. Eq. Pr. (2d Ed.) 289; Grab. Pr. (2d Ed.) 596; 2 Till. & S. Pr. 392.

The cross interrogatories should be accompanied by a notice that they will be presented at the same time the interrogatories are noticed for settlement. 1 Burr. Pr. 444. Unless the order directing the commission prescribes some other mode, the practice stated must be pursued. The plaintiff, who seems to be in a hurry to send off the commission, has already lost six days’ time by failing to observe the rule declared. He may re-serve his interrogatories, with the required notice of settlement; and the defendant must, if he intends to join in the commission; comply with the practice as to cross interrogatories, or lose the benefit thereof. The motion to compel the defendant to forthwith serve his cross interrogatories, being unauthorized, must be denied, with $10 costs to abide the event.
No. 590.

#### Sarah O. Devou, Petitioner, *v.*The City of Cincinnati.

November 9, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. *Mr. Fred W. Kean*for petitioner. *Mr. Geoffrey Goldsmith*and *Mr. Edward M. Ballard*for respondent.
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT N ove m be r 28, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 04- 16353 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C. Do c k e tNo . 0 0 - 0 0 2 6 2 - CR - J - 2 0 HTS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s W I L L I A M A L L E N A RN O L D , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( N ove m be r28, 2005) B efo re T JO F L A T , C A RN E S an d B A R K E T T , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: W illia m A lle n A rn o ld , p r o s e , ap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s r e v o c a tio n o f h is2

s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e . A rnol d c ha l l e nge s hi s unde r l y i ng c onvi c t i on a nd s e nt e nc e , a nd cont ends thatthe prob at i on offi ce r w ho subm i tt ed a pet i t i on no t i fy i ng the courtthat he vi ol at ed cond i t i on s of hi s s up ervi se d rel ea se engaged i n the un autho ri ze d prac t i ce of l aw , thatthe se nt enci ng j ud ge erre d i n fai l i ng t o rec use hi m se l f, and that the di s tr i c tc our tvi ol a t e d the S e pa r a t i on of P ow e r s doc tr i ne by s e nt e nc i ng hi m t o a t erm of i m pri sonm entbase d o n h i s vi ol at i on of a c on di t i on of supervi se d rel ea se . W e f in d n o e rr o r . W e w ill n o t c o n s id e rA rn o ld 's a r g u m e n ts c h a lle n g in g h is un derl yi ng conv i ct i on because thi s C ou rtaf fi rm ed A rnol d' s c on vi ct i on on di re ct appeal , and thi s i s nota 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 5 p roce edi ng . W e l i kew i se do no tconsi der A rn o ld 's a r g u m e n ts c h a lle n g in g h is u n d e r ly in g s e n te n c e , b e c a u s e th e s e n te n c e is pr e s um e d va l i d a nd c a nnotbe c ha l l e nge d i n a r e voc a t i on pr oc e e di ng. B y r e por t i ng t o the c our tthe s t a tus of A rnol d’ s s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e , the pr oba t i on of f i c e ri s not engagi ng i n the un autho ri ze d p ra ct i ce of l aw . W e f i nd no error i n the procedures ut i l i z e d by the di s tr i c tc ourtbe l ow a nd f i nd no abus e of

di s c r e t i on i n the r e voc a t i on o f A rn o l d ' s su p erv i sed rel ease, o r i n th e d i stri ctco u rtj u d g e’ s refu sal t o recu se hi m se l f f rom the se nt enci ng proceedi ng , as there i s no evi dence of any per sonal bi a s orpr e

j udi c e by the di s tr i c tc our tj udge a ga i ns tA rnol d. F i na l l y , the r e voc a t i on of supervi se d rel ea se proces s does notvi ol at e the S epar at i on of P ow er s doctri ne. AF F I RME D.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1620 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1620

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2020

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
                        Chesapeake Bay Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Program 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM.

    Section 117(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1267(j)) is amended by striking ``$40,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2001 through 2005'' and inserting ``$90,000,000 for fiscal year 
2021, $90,500,000 for fiscal year 2022, $91,000,000 for fiscal year 
2023, $91,500,000 for fiscal year 2024, and $92,000,000 for fiscal year 
2025''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7681
WILLIAM EARL GORHAM, Petitioner - Appellant, versusGEORGE KENTWORTHY; PAUL TAYLOR; P. LOWRYCHAVIS, Programs Supervisor at Lumberton Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-ct-00042-H) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Earl Gorham, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Earl Gorham appeals the district court’s orders dismissing part of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying relief on the remainder of his claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gorham v. Kentworthy , No. 5:05-ct-00042-H (Aug. 4, 2005 and Sept. 12, 2006). We also deny Gorham’s motion to alter his filing fee. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc. (the "Registrant") that theQuarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of theRegistrant for such period.

| Date: November 14, 2003/s/ Fred G. Kowal	   Fred G. KowalChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 14, 2003/s/ Arthur W. Budich	   Arthur W. BudichSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**USFF Band Menu**

                    - USFF Band Home
                    - USFF Band Leadership
                    - Performing Ensembles
                    - Upcoming Schedule
                    - U.S. Navy Fleet Band Auditions
                    - Contact USFF Band

#                                                 ENSIGN CHRISTOPHER B. MCGANN                                                                                            

#### ASSISTANT FLEET BANDMASTER, U.S. Fleet Forces Band

30 January 2024
                ENS McGann                            ENS McGann                            Ensign McGann, a native of Burlington, Massachusetts, graduated in 2003 from the University of Wisconsin-Madison with a Bachelor’s Degree in Trumpet Performance and was commissioned through the Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer Program in November of 2023.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Dawkins, Winifield S PO1VIRIN: 240112-O-TX341-9999

Ensign McGann, a native of Burlington, Massachusetts, graduated in 2003 from the University of Wisconsin-Madison with a Bachelor’s Degree in Trumpet Performance and was commissioned through the Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer Program in November of 2023. 

 

He entered the Navy in 2010 and attended Recruit Training in Great Lakes, Illinois. Upon completion of Musician “A” School in Virginia Beach, Virginia, he reported to Navy Band Northwest, Silverdale, Washington, Navy Band Southwest, San Diego, California, and Navy Band Northeast, Newport, Rhode Island where he served as trumpet instrumentalist, Unit Leader, and Leading Petty Officer. 

 

His awards include the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal, Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal (4 awards), as well as various unit and campaign awards. 

 

ENS McGann is married to Holly Carlton, of Holyoke, Massachusetts and they have two children. 

Tags:
**USFFC**USFF Band
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

FORM DCM 

CONTRACT MARKET 

APPLICATION OR AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION FOR DESIGNATION 

COVER SHEET

KalshiEX LLC

Exact name of Applicant as Specified in charter 

45 Lansing St, #2205, San Francisco, CA, 94105 

Address of principal executive offices 

[X] If this is an APPLICATION for designation, complete in full and check here

[ ] If this is an AMENDMENT to an application, or to an existing designation, list all items 

that are amended and check here

GENERAL INFORMATION 

1. Name under which the business of the designated contract market is or will be conducted, if 

different than name specified above (include acronyms, if any): 

Kalshi 
2. If name of designated contract market is being amended, state previous designated contract 

market name: 

N/A

3. Contact information, including mailing address if different than address specified above: 

N/A

Number and Street 

City State Country Zip Code 

617.909.1097

Main Phone Number Fax 

www.kalshi.com tarek@kalshi.com 

Website URL E-mail Address 

4. List of principal office(s) and address(es) where designated contract market activities are/will 

be conducted: 

 Office Address 

 Same as above 

5. If Applicant is a successor to a previously designated contract market, please complete the

following: 

a. Date of Succession:
b. Full name and address of predecessor designee 

Name 

City State Country Zip Code 

Main Phone Number Website URL 

BUSINESS ORGANIZATION

6. Applicant is a: 

[ ] Corporation

[ ] Partnership 

[X] Limited Liability Company 

[ ] Other form of organization (specify) ______________________________________ 

7. Date of incorporation or formation: December 10, 2019 

8. State of incorporation or jurisdiction of organization: Delaware 

9. Applicant agrees and consents that the notice of any proceeding before the Commission in 

connection with this application may be given by sending such notice by certified mail to the 

person named below at the address given. 

TAREK MANSOUR, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Print Name and Title 

KalshiEX LLC

Name of Applicant 

45 Lansing St. 

Number and Street 
San Francisco CA 94105 

City State Zip Code 

10. The Applicant has duly caused this application or amendment to be signed on its behalf by 

the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized, this 27th day of December, 2019. The Applicant 

and the undersigned represent hereby that all information contained herein is true, current, 

and complete. It is understood that all required items and Exhibits are considered integral 

parts of this Form DCM and that the submission of any amendment represents that all 

un-amended items and Exhibits remain true, current, and complete as previously filed. 

KalshiEX LLC 

Name of Applicant 

Signature of Duly Authorized Person 

TAREK MANSOUR, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

Print Name and Title of Signatory
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Tidelands Royalty
Trust B (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K. /s/ R. RAY BELLR. Ray BellPrincipal Accounting OfficerDated: March 29, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tidelands
Royalty Trust B and will be retained by Tidelands Royalty Trust B and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item
601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 17
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [CC Docket No. 92-237; DA 01-1125] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

On May 1, 2001, the Commission released a public notice announcing the resignation of John R. Hoffman, Chairman of the North American Numbering Council (NANC) and cancellation of the May 22-23, 2001 NANC meeting. The intended effect of this action is to make the public aware of the resignation of the NANC Chairman and cancellation of the May NANC meeting. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Deborah Blue, Special Assistant to the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at (202) 418-2320 or                         *dblue@fcc.gov.*                         The address is: Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, The Portals, 445 12th Street, SW., Suite 6A207, Washington, DC 20554. The fax number is: (202) 418-2345. The TTY number is: (202) 418-0484.                     

Federal Communications Commission.

Diane Griffin Harmon,

Acting Chief, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau.

[FR Doc. 01-11242 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### LEANNA PUTMAN *v.*CHRISTOPHER KENNEDY

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17396.

*Susan M. Phillips,*in support of the petition.

Decided March 15, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 25425) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly dismissed this appeal on the ground that the appeal was moot?”
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**
 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
 (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 I, Don M. Gibson, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d- 15(e) ) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures , or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) [Reserved  not effective]
 
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures , as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation ; and
 
 d) Disclosed in this report any change tin the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting , to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: May 12, 2004
 /s/ Don M. Gibson
 Don M. Gibson
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)