alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        09 January 2024    

#                     Surface Navy Association National Symposium                 

                 Good afternoon everyone. Thank you, Rick, for inviting me to speak again this year and for your kind introduction. And, thank you for accommodating my request to speak today in order for me to attend the Naval Reactors’ change of office tomorrow between two of my great friends, Frank Caldwell and            

        11 January 2023    

#                     SURFACE NAVY ASSOCIATION NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM                 

                REMARKS AS DELIVERED  Well, good morning everyone. Thank you for being here – more importantly, thanks to Rick, Dave, and Bill for inviting me to speak again! To be honest, as a submariner, when I spoke here last year I wasn’t sure I’d make it through my remarks without at least a few surface            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hypercom Corporation
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I certify that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 of Hypercom Corporation (the Report) fully complies with the

requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Hypercom Corporation. By: /s/ John W. SmolakJohn W. SmolakChief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 

#           Harrison H. Schmitt      

      By Astrogeology Science Center

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Maps 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  Software 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

**Jack Schmitt joined the Astrogeology team as a geologist** at the Flagstaff Science Center in 1964, having recently earned a doctorate degree from Harvard University. In addition to assisting in the geologic mapping of the Moon, he led the Lunar Field Geological Methods project. When NASA announced a special recruitment for *scientist-astronauts* in late 1964, Schmitt applied.

View Media Details

Out of more than 1,000 applicants, six were chosen. Of those six, Joe Kerwin, Owen Garriott, and Edward Gibson would fly in the Skylab missions in 1973 and 1974, and Schmitt would go to the Moon on the Apollo 17 mission.Just one year after joining the USGS, Schmitt was transferred to NASA and began his pilot training at Williams Air Force Base in Arizona. On December 7, 1972, Apollo 17 was launched, carrying Schmitt, Ronald Evans, and mission commander Eugene Cernan. On December 11, the lunar module, *Challenger*, landed at Taurus-Littrow on the Moon, and four hours later Cernan and Schmitt became the eleventh and twelfth men to walk on the moon. The pair did a total of three EVAs (extravehicular activities) before their departure on December 14, collecting rock and soil samples, taking photographs, setting up equipment, and making observations. During the mission, Schmitt and Cernan discovered orange soil, an surprising find that created a great deal of excitement in the scientific community. Schmitt was the only geologist to go to the Moon.

Apollo 17 was the final manned mission in a four year exploration of the Moon. The crew of Apollo 17 left a plaque that reads:

"Here man completed his first exploration of the Moon, December 1972 A.D. May the spirit of peace in which we came be reflected in the lives of all mankind."

## Related Content

                  -              Multimedia           

Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)

December 31, 1972

#### Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)

link

Harrison H. Schmitt during the Apollo 17 mission.

Arizona, Astrogeology Science Center

December 31, 1972

#### Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)

link

#### Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)

link

Harrison H. Schmitt during the Apollo 17 mission.

Arizona, Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)

December 31, 1972

#### Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)

link

Harrison H. Schmitt during the Apollo 17 mission.

Arizona, Astrogeology Science Center

December 31, 1972

#### Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)

link

#### Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)

link

Harrison H. Schmitt during the Apollo 17 mission.

Arizona, Astrogeology Science Center
(83 South. 926)

#### DIXON v. STATE.

(1 Div. 117.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 13, 1919.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Saffold Berney, Judge.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
Exhibit
10.3


 





 


December 16,
2005


 


Alton
T. Kuioka


 


Re:                             Revisions to Retention Agreement
to Comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code


 


Dear
Alton,


 


This letter agreement revises and replaces the
retention agreement that Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Bank of Hawaii
(collectively, the “Bank”) entered into with you on May 3, 2004.  These revisions are necessary to comply with Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code, which applies new rules for deferred
compensation effective January 1, 2005. 
If you agree with the terms of this letter agreement, please date, sign,
and return it to the Bank’s Director of Human Resources on or before December 30,
2005.


 


Retention Payment


 


If you perform your duties to the Bank’s
satisfaction through December 31, 2005, the Bank will pay you a retention
payment equal to twenty-four (24) months of your base monthly salary as of December 31,
2005.  The retention payment will be paid
to you in a single lump sum on or before March 15, 2006.  Also, the balance of your initial membership
fees for the Oahu Country Club and the Waialae Country Club will be imputed to
you as income in January 2006.


 


On behalf of the Bank, I want to thank you for your
many years of extraordinary service, and I look forward to your continuing involvement
with the Bank and its customers.


 


	
   

  	
  BANK OF HAWAII CORPORATION and

  BANK OF HAWAII

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Allan R. Landon

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Allan R. Landon

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman of the Board, CEO, and President

  



 


I agree to the revision and replacement of the
retention agreement dated May 3, 2004, with this letter agreement.


 


 


	
  Dated: December 16, 2005

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Alton T. Kuioka

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Alton T. Kuioka
#### Josephine DeNigro, Appellant, v John N. DeNigro, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Oneida County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The trial court properly determined on the merits that defendant’s divorce decree obtained in Guam in 1985 was entitled to comity. The court erred, however, in summarily dismissing plaintiff’s claim for equitable distribution without a hearing and without enumerating the statutory factors it considered *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d]). The record indicates that each *952party has a pension which constitutes marital property subject to equitable distribution *(see, Majauskas v Majauskas,*61 NY2d 481). There may be other marital property as well *(see, Price v Price,*69 NY2d 8). Plaintiff may be entitled to a portion of the marital assets based upon her contribution and efforts throughout the marriage *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [6]; *Arvantides v Arvantides,*64 NY2d 1033, 1034; *cf, Wegman v Wegman,*123 AD2d 220). Since the record before us is inadequate to make our own findings we remit the matter for a hearing on the issues of equitable distribution of marital property and related counsel fees *(see, Norgauer v Norgauer,*126 AD2d 957; *Woertler v Woertler,*110 AD2d 947, 948-949; *Pacifico v Pacifico,*101 AD2d 709; *cf, Damiano v Damiano,*94 AD2d 132). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — equitable distribution.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
(82 South. 894)

#### Ex parte HARTSELLE.

(8 Div. 191.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 22, 1919.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Wert & Lynne, of Decatur, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Petition dismissed for noncompliance with amended Supreme Court rule 42 (198 Ala. 1, 77 South, vii) as to certificate of service of copy of brief upon .counsel on the other side.
#### WHITEMAN, Appellant, v. SARATOGA K. S. CO. (FIRST NAT. BANK, Respondent).

Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

May, 1894.)

Action by Louis P. Whiteman against the Saratoga Kissingen Spring Company. An attachment was vacated on the motion of the First National Bank of Saratoga Springs, a junior attaching creditor, and plaintiff appeals. J. B. A. Mullally, for appellant. Walter M. Rosebault, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

An affirmance of the order under review Is required by the decision of this court in Bank v. Hall, 60 Hun, 466, 15 N. Y. Supp. 208. The order should therefore be affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information form consolidated financial
statements for the second quarter ended June 30, 1998, filed on Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                      6,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,249
<PP&E>                                          49,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,808)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,931
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,603
<SALES>                                         24,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,250
<CGS>                                           15,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (229)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 429
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,853
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,511
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,511
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
Clear All

        24 January 2024    

#                     USS Gunston Hall Departs Norfolk for NATO Exercise Steadfast Defender 2024                 

                NORFOLK, Va. -- The Whidbey Island-class dock landing ship USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44) departed Naval Station Norfolk, Jan. 24, for Steadfast Defender 2024, NATO’s largest exercise in decades.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
August 4, 2006

Via e-Mail

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 06.96 — Notification of
Amendment to NYMEX Division Rule 6.21G.

Dear Ms. Eileen A. Donovan:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“NYMEX” or the “Exchange”) hereby
notifies the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) of an amendment to NYMEX
Rule 6.21G, Participation by NYMEX Floor Members in Special Program for Over-the-Counter
Trading with FCM Guarantee.

Effective August 4, 2006, the Exchange has obtained permanent CFTC regulatory relief
that allows NYMEX Floor Members to trade in OTC markets under specified conditions.
Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the
Exchange hereby certifies that the attached amendment complies with the Act, including
regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Nancy Minett, Vice
President, Compliance, at (212) 299-2940, or Adam E. Wernow, Compliance Counsel, at (212)
299-2851.

Very truly yours,

Thomas F. Lasala
Senior Vice President
Compliance and Risk Management

Attachments
cc: Nancy Minett
Brian Regan



Amendment to NYMEX Rule 6.21G
(Underlining in bold indicates additions; strike-outs indicate deletions.)

Rule 6.21G, Participation by NYMEX Floor Members in Special Program for Over-the-
Counter Trading with FCM Guarantee

(A) In accordance with the CFTC’s Order effective August 4, 2006, t Fhis program is
effective until August4,2006,oruntil such ether date as announced by the Exchange. The
over-the-counter (OTC) contracts, agreements or transactions must be executed pursuant to
Section 2(h)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (Act), which in effect provides among other
things that such transactions shall be subject to CFTC anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority
and also may not be entered into on a trading facility. This program generally allows a NYMEX
Floor Member to enter into trading in certain OTC contracts on the basis of a FCM guarantee
without needing to satisfy the total assets requirements otherwise necessary under the Act for
such trading. In order to maintain eligibility for this program, a NYMEX Floor Member must
continue to satisfy all of the conditions contained in this rule.

(Sections (B) through (F) remain unchanged.)
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine months ended February 28, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Martine
Caron, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:
March 25, 2009








MARTINE
CARON


Martine
Caron


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director














-1-
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11926]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Bonneville Power Administration


Santiam-Bethel Transmission Line Project

AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy 
(DOE).

ACTION: Notice of floodplain and wetlands involvement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces BPA's proposal to rebuild a 17-mile 
portion of the Santiam-Chemawa single-circuit 230-kilovolt (kV) line as 
a double-circuit 230-kV line in the existing right-of-way in 
floodplains and wetlands located in Marion and Linn Counties, Oregon. 
The purpose of the project is to prevent overloads on the Santiam-
Chemawa 230-kV line. In accordance with DOE regulations for compliance 
with floodplain and wetlands environmental review requirements, BPA 
will prepare a floodplain and wetlands assessment and will perform this 
proposed action in a manner so as to avoid or minimize potential harm 
to or within the affected floodplain and wetlands. The assessment will 
be included in the environmental assessment being prepared for the 
proposed project in accordance with the requirements of the National 
Environmental Policy Act. A floodplain statement of findings will be 
included in any finding of no significant impact that may be issued 
following the completion of the environmental assessment.

DATES: Comments are due to the address below no later than May 29, 
2001.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Communications, Bonneville Power 
Administration--KC-7, P.O. Box 12999, Portland, Oregon, 97212. Internet 
address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a0acaeaea6adb783a1b3a2eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b787476767e756f5b796b7a357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie Kelleher, Bonneville Power 
Administration--KEC-4, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon, 97208-3621; 
telephone number 503-230-7692; fax number 503-230-5699.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BPA Santiam-Bethel transmission line 
rebuild would cross the 100-year floodplain of North Santiam River 
(T9S, R1E, Section 22) and a tributary to the Pudding River (T7S, R2W, 
Section 25); a total of 14 wetlands were identified within the cleared 
right-of-way.
    Maps and further information are available from BPA at the address 
above.

    Issued in Portland, Oregon, on May 4, 2001.
Thomas C. McKinney,
NEPA Compliance Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-11926 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

November 28, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-16353

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 00-00262-CR-J-20HTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

WILLIAM ALLEN ARNOLD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(November 28, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Allen Arnold, pro se, appeals the district court’s revocation of his
2

supervised release. Arnold challenges his underlying conviction and sentence, and

contends that the probation officer who submitted a petition notifying the court that

he violated conditions of his supervised release engaged in the unauthorized

practice of law, that the sentencing judge erred in failing to recuse himself, and that

the district court violated the Separation of Powers doctrine by sentencing him to a

term of imprisonment based on his violation of a condition of supervised release.

We find no error. We will not consider Arnold's arguments challenging his

underlying conviction because this Court affirmed Arnold's conviction on direct

appeal, and this is not a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. We likewise do not consider

Arnold's arguments challenging his underlying sentence, because the sentence is

presumed valid and cannot be challenged in a revocation proceeding. By reporting

to the court the status of Arnold’s supervised release, the probation officer is not

engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. We find no error in the procedures

utilized by the district court below and find no abuse of discretion in the revocation

of Arnold's supervised release, or in the district court judge’s refusal to recuse

himself from the sentencing proceeding, as there is no evidence of any personal

bias or prejudice by the district court judge against Arnold. Finally, the revocation

of supervised release process does not violate the Separation of Powers doctrine.

AFFIRMED.