alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11730]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging

[Program Announcement No. AoA-01-04]


Fiscal Year 2001 Program Announcement; Availability of Funds and 
Notice Regarding Applications

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.

ACTION: Request for applications for a National Center for Family 
Friends/Volunteer Senior Aides to provide training and technical 
assistance to current projects, fund and assist new projects, and 
develop and implement new models to demonstrate alternative funding 
strategies.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration on Aging announces that under this program 
announcement it will hold a competition for a grant award for one (1) 
project at a federal share of approximately $485,000 per year for a 
project period of two years. The purpose of the project is to support a 
national center to further build and support a national system of 
Family Friends/Volunteer Senior Aides projects, and to develop and 
implement new models to demonstrate alternative funding strategies for 
local program replication/expansion.
    The deadline date for the submission of applications is June 15, 
2001. Public and/or nonprofit agencies, organizations, or institutions 
are eligible to apply. To be considered for funding, however, the 
applicant must be experienced in providing services to the designated 
populations inherent to the Family Friends/VSA programs.
    Application kits are available by writing to the U.S. Department of 
Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging, Office of Program 
Development, 330 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 4264, Washington, DC 
20201, by calling 202/619-2987 or on the web at http://www.aoa.gov/t4/fy2001.

    Dated: May 4, 2001.
Norman L. Thompson,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 01-11730 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Pagan, Also Known as Kadri Bey-Cruz, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered November 6, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Since there was no objection by defense counsel to the submission of the verdict sheet to the jury, the issue is unpreserved for review (CPL 470.05 [2]; *see, People v Rodriguez,*144 AD2d 598; *People v Decambre,*143 AD2d 927; *People v Williams,*138 AD2d 430), and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt. We further find that this sentence was neither harsh nor excessive *(People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 39-5 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 39-5 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 39-5 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 39-5 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 39-5 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Sitesearch Corporation (the Company) for the quarter
ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James S. Dixon, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/ James S. Dixon James S. Dixon Chief Executive Officer December
15, 2008
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR     Document 39      Filed 10/17/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR     Document 39      Filed 10/17/2007     Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24267-24268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12053]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Parts 202

[Docket No. RM 2001-4]


Renewal Copyright Registration

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Final rule: technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is making technical amendments in the 
regulation regarding copyright renewal to reflect the modification in 
duration of the extended renewal term from forty-seven years to sixty-
seven years as a result of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 14, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kent Dunlap, Principal Legal Advisor 
for the General Counsel, Telephone: (202) 707-8380. Telefax: (202) 707-
8366.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 27, 1998, President Clinton 
signed into law the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, Pub. L. 
105-298, extending for an additional 20 years the term of copyright 
protection in the United States. This law increased the extended 
copyright renewal term under section 304 of the copyright law, from 
forty-seven years to sixty-seven years. These technical amendments add 
a reference to Pub. L. 105-298 and substitute sixty-seven years in 
places where the renewal regulation designates forty-seven years.

List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 202

    Copyright registration.

Technical Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Copyright Office is amending 
part 202 of 37 CFR, chapter II in the manner set forth below.

PART 202--REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT

    1. The authority citation for part 202 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.


Sec. 202.17  [Amended]

    2. In Sec. 202.17:

    a. Paragraph (a) is amended by adding ``and Pub. L. 105-298.'' at 
the end of the paragraph.
    b. Paragraph (c) is amended by removing the phrases ``extended 
forty-seven year second term'' and ``forty-seven year extended term'' 
and adding ``extended sixty-seven year second

[[Page 24268]]

term'' and ``sixty-seven year extended term,'' respectively.
    c. Paragraph (e)(1) is amended by removing the phrase ``extended 
forty-seven year second term'' and adding ``extended sixty-seven year 
second term''.
    d. Paragraph (f)(1) is amended by removing the phrase ``forty-seven 
year renewal term'' and adding ``sixty-seven year renewal term.''

    Dated: May 9, 2001.
Marilyn J. Kretsinger,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-12053 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50972 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GENE GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-97-CR-35-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1998 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gene Guerrero appeals his conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a search of his vehicle because the officers lacked probable cause to search the vehicle. The district court’s factual findings are not clearly erroneous. United States v. Thomas , 12 F.3d 1350, 1366 (5th Cir. 1994); see United States v. Guerrero , No. SA-97-CR-35 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 1997). The district court did not err in denying the motion toNo. 97-50972 -2- suppress evidence on the ground that the officers had probable cause to conduct the search of Guerrero’s vehicle. See United States v. Williams , 69 F.3d 27, 28 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-05404-AKH Document 6 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05404-AKH Document 6 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
March 9, 2007 => fl &

VIA E-MAIL FCCP Te cabinet
Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certifications. New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. Submission #07.30:
Changes to NYMEX Rule 2.10

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“Exchange”) is notifying the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (“Commission”) that it is self-certifying the changes attached with this submission to
NYMEX Rule 2.10. The amendment provides for a modest reduction in the number of NYMEX Holdings
shares that must be maintained by NYMEX Member Firms, This amendment is only applicable to NYMEX
Division Member Firms as there is no share holding requirement applicable to COMEX-only Division Member Firms.
Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange
hereby certifies that the attached rule changes comply with the Act, including regulations under the Act;
these changes will be made effective on March 12, 2007.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact the undersigned at (212)
299-2207.

Very truly yours,

Brian J. Regan
Vice President and Counsel

Att.



CFTC Commissioners
March 10, 2006
Page 2

NOTIFICATION OF AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 2.10
(Underlining in bold indicates additions; strike-outs in bold indicate deletions.)
Rule 2.10 MEMBER FIRM PRIVILEGES

(A) Each firm, as a condition of obtaining and maintaining Member Firm privileges, shall
be required to own and or have conferred upon it two (2) Exchange memberships in
each Division in which it desires Member Firm privileges. The firm shall also be required
to designate one or two individuals as its "conferring Members". Conferring Members
may individually own the membership(s) and or hold such memberships via ABC
Agreement. In addition, until further notice from the Exchange, each NYMEX Division
Member Firm shall at all times own or have pledged/conferred upon it at least 480,000
150,000 shares in NYMEX Holdings, Inc. common stock.

(B) In the case of one conferring Member, such Member shall be an executive officer,
general partner or an executive officer of a corporate general partner of the firm.

(C) In the case of two conferring Members, at least one member shall be an executive
officer, general partner or an executive officer of a corporate general partner of the firm;
the other conferring Member need only be a bona fide full time employee of the firm.

(D) As used in this Rule, an executive officer, general partner or an executive officer of
a corporate general partner must have the power to direct the affairs of the firm with
respect to transactions executed on the Exchange or shall be the senior commodity
officer of the firm.

(E) Trades done for the account of any parent, subsidiary, affiliate, etc. of a Member
Firm, if not itself a Member Firm shall be at non-Member rates; only the firm obtaining
Member Firm status hereunder may receive Member rates.
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
153 So. 189

#### CITY OF BIRMINGHAM v. BANKS.

6 Div. 370.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 18, 1934.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1934.

W. J. Wynn and T. A. McFarland, both of Birmingham, for appellant.

John W. Altman and Fred G. Koenig, both of Birmingham, for appellee.

BROWN, Justice.

The facts and circumstances attending the appellant’s application for a postponement of the trial clearly differentiate this case from the case of City of Birmingham v. Goolsby, 227 Ala. 421, 150 So. 322.

In that case it appeared that the defendant had only one attorney of record who was then actually engaged in the trial of another case in the same court, the circuit court of Jefferson county, which had been on trial for several days. It did not appear that the defendant had on the docket many cases — more than could be handled by one trial lawyer, without impeding the business of the court.

In the instant case the defendant had two attorneys of record, Messrs. Wilkinson and Burton, one of whom was engaged in taking *296testimony before a committee of tbe United States Senate at tbe federal building in tbe city of Birmingham, but tbe record is silent as to bow the other attorney of record was engaged, if at all. Moreover, it further appears that the city attorney, Mr. Wynn, after the presiding judge had overruled the motion to postpone the trial, sent Mr. Willis, one of his assistants, to aid'Mr. Prank Wilkinson, who applied for a continuance, in trying the case, and Mr. Prank Wilkinson refused to participate in the trial, on the instruction of the senior member of his firm, and, in the absence of Mr. Prank Wilkinson, Mr. Willis declined to engage in the trial. It further appears that Messrs. Wilkinson and Burton had a very heavy docket of cases, many of them against the city of Birmingham.

 The motion to postpone the trial of the case was addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court, and its refusal is not reviewable except for gross abuse of the discretion. Such motions depend upon the peculiar facts of the particular case. We are not of opinion that the record shows such abiise. This is the only question presented and argued.

Affirmed.

ANDEESON, C. X, and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
# C_2005048EN.01000201.xml

| 24.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/2

---

Reference and recovery rates in the field of State aid

(2005/C 48/02)

1.   Reference rate

The Commission adopts the following reference rates for the new Member States:

| In force from: | CY | CZ | EE | HU | LV | LT | MT | PL | SK | SI |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2005 | 6,33 | 4,86 | 5,50 | 8,59 | 6,64 | 6,49 | 7,00 | 7,62 | 7,55 | 5,10 |
| 1.5.2004 | 6,33 | 5,00 | 5,50 | 8,59 | 6,64 | 6,49 | 7,00 | 9,56 | 7,55 | 5,10 |

In force from:

CY

CZ

EE

HU

LV

LT

MT

PL

SK

SI

1.1.2005

6,33

4,86

5,50

8,59

6,64

6,49

7,00

7,62

7,55

5,10

1.5.2004

6,33

5,00

5,50

8,59

6,64

6,49

7,00

9,56

7,55

5,10

These rates are fixed on the basis of the method for setting and updating the reference/discount rates published in the Official Journal C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3. Technical adaptations to this method were made by Commission notice published in Official Journal C 241, 26.8.1999, p. 9. This is the first time this method is applied for Poland and the Czech Republic.

For Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia, the method is not applicable due to the unavailability of inter-banking swap rates for their currencies. For these Member states the reference/discount rate is still this which was communicated by these Member States for use at the moment of accession.

2.   Recovery rate

The Commission adopts the following recovery rates pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation 794/2004 for the following new Member States:

| In force from: | CZ | PL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1.5.2004 | 4,86 | 7,62 |

In force from:

CZ

PL

1.5.2004

4,86

7,62

3.   Publication

These figures will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and on the internet site of DG COMP.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
# C_2005091EN.01000501.xml

| 15.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/5

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 7 April 2005

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique

(ECB/2005/8)

(2005/C 91/05)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the Governing Council of the ECB and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the Governing Council of the ECB and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the current external auditors of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique (hereinafter ‘NBB/BNB’) has expired and will not be renewed. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2005. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the current external auditors of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique (hereinafter ‘NBB/BNB’) has expired and will not be renewed. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2005.

| (3) | The NBB/BNB has selected Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren/Réviseurs d'Entreprises as its new external auditors in accordance with its public procurement rules, and the ECB considers that the selected auditors fulfil the necessary requirements for appointment. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The NBB/BNB has selected Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren/Réviseurs d'Entreprises as its new external auditors in accordance with its public procurement rules, and the ECB considers that the selected auditors fulfil the necessary requirements for appointment.

| (4) | The mandate of the external auditors will be for three years and may be renewed once, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The mandate of the external auditors will be for three years and may be renewed once,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren/Réviseurs d'Entreprises should be appointed as the external auditors of the NBB/BNB from the financial year 2005 for a period of three years, this period being renewable once.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 7 April 2005.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        1,292,590
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        4,017,801
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                      0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        4,846,038
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          4,859,044
<LOANS>                                      25,169,284
<ALLOWANCE>                                     145,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               37,244,261
<DEPOSITS>                                   30,811,358
<SHORT-TERM>                                  1,010,287
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              25,573
<LONG-TERM>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          3,703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    5,393,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               37,244,261
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 511,354
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                81,652
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 28,322
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                621,328
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              387,756
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              401,021
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           220,307
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                    0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 214,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  47,795
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       47,795
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     47,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     2.58
<LOANS-NON>                                     655,274
<LOANS-PAST>                                          0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0 
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                149,795
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     4,167
<RECOVERIES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               145,628
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              5,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         140,628
        

</TABLE>
(104 So. 918)

#### STATE ex rel. J. F. TAYLOR et al. v. P. H. McQUEEN, Sheriff of Crenshaw County.

(4 Div. 132.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 29, 1925.)

Original impeachment proceedings.

PER CURIAM.

Proceedings dismissed by relators.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Martine Caron, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Date:   October 13, 2010
 
 MARTINE CARON
 Martine Caron
 Chief Executive Officer,
 President and Director
 
 
 
 -1-