alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 

#           Partners        

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Maps 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  Software 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Astrogeology Science Center collaborates with the many organizations for a variety of research efforts. Here are just a few examples:

### NASA Collaborators

                        - NASA - Ames Research Center - Space Science and Astrobiology
                        - NASA - Jet Propulsion Laboratory
                        - NASA - SuperCam
                        - NASA - ChemCam
                        - NASA - Goddard - Planetary environments laboratory
                        - NASA - MAHLI
                        - NASA - Mastcam

### Other Collaborators

                        - Arizona State University - THEMIS
                        - University of Arizona - HiRISE
                        - University of Zurich and Bern - PlanetS
                        - Northern Arizona University - PLANETS
                        - Arizona State University - Mastcam-Z
                        - Arizona State University - LROC
                        - USRA - MAPSIT

### More NASA missions:

                        - NASA - Mars 2020
                        - NASA - Mars Science Laboratory

#### Lowell Observatory

#### National Aeronautics and Space Administration
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of InSight HealthServices Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”),I, Bret W. Jorgensen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           the information contained in the reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ Bret W. Jorgensen                 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Bret W. Jorgensen                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| September 21, 2007                    |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0144 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0144

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of checks at common borders as regards access to the Schengen Information System by the services in the Member States responsible for issuing registration certificates for vehicles (14238/1/2004 - C6-0007/2005 - 2003/0198(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 045 E , 23/02/2006 P. 0070 - 0074 *

P6_TA(2005)0144

Schengen Information System — access for vehicle registration services ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of checks at common borders as regards access to the Schengen Information System by the services in the Member States responsible for issuing registration certificates for vehicles (14238/1/2004 — C6-0007/2005 — 2003/0198 (COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (14238/1/2004 — C6-0007/2005) [1],

- having regard to its position at first reading [2] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2003)0510) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0084/2005),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ C 103 E, 29.4.2004, p. 794.

--------------------------------------------------
(105 So. 698)

#### Ex parte McCORMACK BROS. MOTOR CAR CO.

(6 Div. 510.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 15, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Beddow & Ray, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Altman & Taylor and Fred G. Koenig, all of Birmingham, opposed.

BOULDIN, J.

Petition of the McCormack Bros. Motor Car Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of McCormack Bros. Motor Car Co. v. Martin, 105 So. 697.

Writ denied. .

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Don Crosbie, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CLAIMSNET.COM INC.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: October 23, 2007/s/ Don Crosbie
Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7134

RENAULT WATKINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:13-cv-03838-WDQ)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Renault Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Lee Andrew 

Flagg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Renault Watkins appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for the return of property pursuant to Fed. 

R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Watkins v. United States, No. 1:13-cv03838-WDQ (D. Md. July 21, 2014). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 657.

#### Burn Line, Ltd., Petitioner, *v.*The United States and Australasia Steamship Company.

January 4, 1909.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. *Mr. f. Parker Kirlin*for petitioner. *Mr. Harrington Putnam*for respondent.
Breadcrumb-  Science Centers 

## Geospatial Semantics and Ontology

More information...

## Multiscale Representation

Read more...

## National Terrain Mapping

Find out more...

## Validation of Elevation Derived Channels

More Information...

-  Home 
-  3DEP Feature Extraction and Conflation 
-  Data Integration 
-  High-performance Computing 
-  Geospatial Semantics and Ontology 
-  Multiscale Representation 
-  National Terrain Mapping 
-  Validation of Elevation-derived Channels 
-  Completed Projects 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

# Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science (CEGIS)

The CEGIS vision is to conduct, lead, and influence the research and innovative solutions required by the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) and the emerging GeoSpatial and GeoSemantic Web. CEGIS is a virtual organization with Federal and academic affiliate scientists conducting research in support of *The National Map* and the Three-Dimensional Elevation Program (3DEP).

Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science Research Plan 2013–18

 

The U.S. Geological Survey Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science (CEGIS) was created in 2006 and since that time has provided research primarily in support of *The National Map*. The presentations and publications of the CEGIS researchers document the research accomplishments that include advances in electronic topographic map design, generalization, data integration, map projections, sea level rise modeling, geospatial semantics, ontology, user-centered design, volunteer geographic information, and parallel and grid computing for geospatial data from *The National Map*. A research plan spanning 2013–18 has been developed extending the accomplishments of the CEGIS researchers and documenting new research areas that are anticipated to support *The National Map* of the future. In addition to extending the 2006–12 research areas, the CEGIS research plan for 2013–18 includes new research areas in data models, geospatial semantics, high-performance computing, volunteered geographic information, crowdsourcing, social media, data integration, and multiscale representations to support the Three-Dimensional Elevation Program (3DEP) and *The National Map* of the future of the U.S. Geological Survey.

## Publications

January 24, 2024

####                 Remote sensing-based 3D assessment of landslides: A review of the data, methods, and applications              

Core Science Systems Mission Area, Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science (CEGIS)

December 31, 2023

####                 GeoAI for spatial image processing              

Core Science Systems Mission Area, Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science (CEGIS)

November 28, 2023

####                 At what scales does a river meander? Scale-specific sinuosity (S3) metric for quantifying stream meander size distribution              

Core Science Systems Mission Area, Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science (CEGIS)

View All
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The CCAF Board of Visitors will hold a meeting to review and discuss academic policies and issues relative to the operation of the college. Agenda items include a review of the operations of the CCAF and an update on the activities of the CCAF Policy Council. 

                        Members of the public who wish to make oral or written statements at the meeting should contact First Lieutenant Matthew M. Groleau, Designated Federal Officer for the Board, at the address below no later than 4:00 p.m. on August 1, 2001. Please mail or electronically mail all requests. Telephone requests will not be honored. The request should identify the name of the individual who will make the presentation and an outline of the issues                               ( print page 23899)                            to be addressed. A minimum of 35 copies of the presentation materials must be given to First Lieutenant Matt Groleau no later than 3 days prior to the time of the board meeting for distribution. Visual aids must be submitted to First Lieutenant Matt Groleau on a 3                        1/2                        -inch computer disk in Microsoft PowerPoint format no later than 4:00 p.m. on August 1, 2001 to allow sufficient time for virus scanning and formatting of the slides.                     

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 21, 2001 at 8:00 a.m. in the First Floor Conference Room, Community College of the Air Force, Building 836, 130 West Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        First Lieutenant Matt Groleau, (334) 953-7322, Community College of the Air Force, 130 West Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, 36112-6613, or through electronic mail at                         *matthew.groleau@maxwell.af.mil.*

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-11819 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
exv10w24



 






Exhibit 10.24




November 21, 2005




Alex Shubat




RE: Base Salary Reduction for Fiscal Year 2006




Dear Alex:



This letter constitutes the agreement (the “Agreement”) between yourself and Virage Logic Corp.
(the “Company”) regarding the reduction of your base salary for fiscal year 2006 (“Salary Reduction
Period”).




     1. Base Salary. Effective October 1, 2005, your base salary will be $14,377.72 per
month (equivalent to $172,532.64 per annum). This represents a reduction of 10%. This new salary
will be in effect through September 30, 2006 or at such time as you and the Company agree to
reinstatement of your previous base salary. If no other action is taken, your base salary will
automatically revert to it pre-reduction level of $15,975.24 per month (equivalent to $191,702.88
per annum) on October 1, 2006. All base salary payments are subject to standard payroll deductions
and withholdings.



     2. Repayment. Since the effective date of this action was prior to the approval of
the Operation Plan, you agree to the recovery of prior payments of base salary for the three pay
periods ending October 15, October 31 and November 15. The total amount to be repaid is $2,396.63.
This repayment will be made through three equal withholding transactions of $798.76 against your
base salary for the pay periods ending November 30, December 15 and December 31. This will result
in a base salary of $6,390.10 for these three periods.



     3. Benefits. During the Salary Reduction Period, you will be eligible to continue
your current Company benefits subject to the terms and limitations of the applicable plans with the
exception of your Life Insurance, AD&D, Short Term Disability and Long Term Disability benefits.
For these benefits your benefit level will remain at the pre-reduction levels.


If this Agreement is acceptable to you, please sign below and return the original to me.



Sincerely,



Virage Logic Corp.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Richard C. Butts	 	 
	 

	 	 

Richard C. Butts
	 	 
	 

	 	Vice President, Human Resources	 	 






Agreed:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

/s/ Alex Shubat
	 	 	 	 

11-22-05
	 	 
	 

	 	 

Alex Shubat
	 	 	 	 

Date
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 32 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 32 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 32 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 32 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 32 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1924 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide child care to veterans 

at Vet Centers in the same manner as the Secretary provides child 

care to veterans at other Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2019 

Mrs. LEE of Nevada (for herself and Mrs. LESKO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide child 

care to veterans at Vet Centers in the same manner 

as the Secretary provides child care to veterans at other 

Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vet Center Childcare 

5 Parity Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1924 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROVISION 

2 OF CHILD CARE AT VET CENTERS. 

3 If the Secretary of Veterans Affairs provides child 

4 care to veterans, the Secretary shall provide child care to 

5 veterans at Vet Centers in the same manner as the Sec6 retary provides child care to veterans at other Department 

7 of Veterans Affairs facilities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
ooreee hPa BMS EW YORK
. — BOARD OF TRADE*

Ge did saenethln World Financial Center
One North End Avenue

New York, New York 10282

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
06-25
September 14, 2006
Ms. Eileen A. Donovan
Acting Secretary of the Commission
Office of the Secretariat
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21TM Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581

Re: New Rule 7.79
Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act and Regulation 40.6

Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Section Sc(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and
Commission Regulation 40.6, the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. (“Exchange”)
submits, by written certification, New Rule 7.79, attached as Exhibit A.

The new rule provides for a yearly renewal process for licensed FCOJ and NFC storage
facilities; existing rules make no provision for such re-licensing after a facility has initially been
approved. By requiring yearly renewal, the Exchange will be able to monitor the operational
controls more closely at each licensed facility.

The Exchange certifies that the amendments comply with the requirements of the
Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The amendments were adopted unanimously by the Exchange’s Board of Governors on
September 13, 2006. No substantive opposing views were expressed by members or others with
respect to the amendments. The amendments will become effective September 18, 2006.


-2-

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 212-748-

4021.
Sincerely,
Jason V. Fusco
Compliance Counsel

Enc.

ce: Riva Adriance

CFTC, Division of Market Oversight
Allen Cooper

CFTC, New York Regional Office


(In the text of the amendments below, additions are underlined and deletions are bracketed and
lined out.)

Rule 7.79

(a) Unless otherwise provided by the Board, each facility license granted or renewed shall be valid
until the thirty-first day of December occurring next following the effective date of the granting or
renewal of the license.

(b) At least sixty (60) days before the expiration of the license term, all licensees must submit to the
Exchange written notification of intent to renew.

(c) The Board may, in its sole and absolute discretion, upon receipt by the Exchange of the Licensee’s
written notification of intent to renew, extend the license term of such licensee.

(d) The Board may, in its sole and absolute discretion, extend for the ensuing fiscal year, or any part
thereof, any license for which a notice of intention to renew has not been submitted.

(e) The facility operator must submit to the Exchange, in addition to written notification of its intent
to renew, proof, in a form acceptable to the FCOJ Warehouse and Delivery Committee, of the minimum
coverages required by Rule 7.64.

Exhibit A
Case 1:07-cv-05809-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05809-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 2 of 2