alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Laura M. Bray, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CLAIMSNET.COM INC.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: July 24, 2007   /s/ Laura M. Bray   Laura M. Bray  Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-14 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 20 of 20
September 22, 2006

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2719.02
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Amendments to Regulation XX42.03 per the attached text (addition underlined;
deletion bracketed and struck through).

Regulation XX42.03 defines the final settlement day for CBOT Dow Jones-AIG Excess Return
Commodity Index*” futures. The referenced amendment will correct the definition to make it
consistent with the last trading day for this contract as defined by Regulation XX09.01 (i.e., the
third Wednesday of the contract month).

The CBOT intends to implement this change concurrently with the launch of trading in the
referenced contract (currently scheduled for October 2, 2006).

There were no opposing views regarding this amendment.

The CBOT certifies that this amendment conforms with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
rules thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

“Dow Jones,” AIG ®" and “Dow Jones-AIG Commodity IndexTM," are service marks of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and
American International Group, Inc. (“American International Group”), as the case may be, and have been licensed for use for
certain purposes by the CBOT. CBOT's DJ-AIG ER contracts based on the Dow Jones-AIG Commodity IndexTM, are not

sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Dow Jones, AIG Financial Products Corp. (“AIG-FPTM), American International Group,

or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates, and none of Dow Jones, AIG-FP, American International Group, or any of
their respective subsidiaries or affiliates, makes any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such contracts.



Addition underlined; deletion bracketed and struck through

xx42.03 Final Settlement Day — The final settlement day shall be defined as the third
Wednesday [business-day] of the contract month, or if the Dow Jones-AIG Commodity Index”
is not published for that day, the first preceding business day for which the Dow Jones-AIG
Commodity Index” was published.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 9 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DUDLEY EDWARDS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NEW MEXICO STATE HIGHWAY

AND TRANSPORTATION

DEPARTMENT; ROBERT G. BURD,

Supervisor III; GENE LEYBA,

Supervisor II,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-2349

(D.C. No. CIV-96-789-JC)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , BARRETT , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
-2-

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff Dudley R. Edwards, Jr., appearing pro se, appeals the district

court’s summary judgment dismissal of his complaint alleging claims under

42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

“We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo,

applying the same standard used by the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).” 

Novell, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co. , 141 F.3d 983, 985 (10th Cir. 1998). After

a thorough review of the record, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by

the district court in its order dated October 3, 1997, granting summary judgment.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New

Mexico is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Clear All

        05 March 2024    

                    AIRLANT kicks off Active-Duty Fund Drive to support Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society                 
                The official kick-off ceremony for this year’s Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society (NMCRS) Active-Duty Fund Drive (ADFD) was held at U.S. Fleet Forces Command Headquarters on board Naval Support Activity Hampton Roads, March 5. This year’s NMCRS ADFD chair is Rear Adm. Doug Verissimo,            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**Exhibit** **** **32.2**




**CFO
        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **RULE
        13a - 14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**
 **OF
        1934, AS AMENDED, AND**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF** **2002** *****





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Bruce Winston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




/s/
      Bruce Winston




Bruce
      Winston


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





August
      14, 2006





*
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shaun A. Burke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Shaun A. Burke





Shaun A. Burke


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





May 16, 2011





*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DOCSNY-267089v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

ROBERT SPARANO (AND WIFE, THERESA 

SPARANPO), 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-5388-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-267089v01 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

/s/ Judith R. Cohen______________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 21, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-2179

Lower Tribunal No. F17-21512

________________

John Allen Calaway,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler 

Mendez, Judge.

John Allen Calaway, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

  Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Thomas  W.  Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer, and James A. Dowd,
Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer of Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company"),  each  certify  in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he
has  reviewed  the  Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended  March  31,  2006  and  that  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   the report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
     Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the information  contained  in  the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

The  purpose  of  this  statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section  1350  of  the  United  States  Code,  as  amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002.





May 22, 2006             /s/ Thomas W. Schneider
------------             -----------------------
Date                     Thomas W. Schneider
                         President and Chief Executive Officer


May 22, 2006             /s/ James A. Dowd
------------             -----------------
Date                     James A. Dowd
                         Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
DOCSNY-266913v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

ANTWI SAMUEL, 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-5399-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-266913v01 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

/s/ Judith R. Cohen______________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Vollman Realty Inc., Respondent, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to enjoin the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Office of Rent Administration, from enforcing the provisions of an order dated April 30, 1986, which found that the petitioner had overcharged rent to a tenant, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cohen, J.), dated September 3, 1987, which denied the appellant’s cross motion to dismiss the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the cross motion is granted and the proceeding is dismissed.

This proceeding must be dismissed for failure of the petitioner to exhaust its administrative remedies *(see,*CPLR 7801; Administrative Code of City of New York § 26-516 [h]; 9 NYCRR 2510.2 [b]; 2529.2; *Matter of Kawary v Joy,*104 Misc 2d 690, *affd*84 AD2d 550; *Matter of Geherin v Sylvester,*75 AD2d 991). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
February 22, 2007

Via E-Mail

Office of the Acting Secretary
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 07.34 - Notification
of Amendments to Chapter 9, Appendix A, for the NYMEX
Platinum Option Contract.

Dear Ms. Eileen Donovan:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “‘Commission”) of amendments to
Chapter 9, Appendix A, for the NYMEX Platinum Option Contract.

Effective February 26, 2007, the amendments to Chapter 9, Appendix A, reflect the
elimination of the expiration limit (Rule 9.27) for the NYMEX Platinum Option Contract, and a
change in the contract’s reporting level (Rule 9.34) to 25 lots from 50. Pursuant to Section Se(c)
of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies
that the attached rule amendments comply with the Act, including regulations under the Act.

If you have any questions, please contact Anthony V. Densieski, Senior Director, Market
Surveillance, at (212) 299-2881.

Sincerely,

Thomas F. LaSala
Chief Regulatory Officer

ce: Thomas LaSala
Brian Regan
Anthony V. Densieski


‘AIWAny ‘AWAny
Contract Commo- One One Expira: | Expiration Expiration Report:
}__Name | __ Rule dity Month Month tion ing
Chapter_| Code ability ability | Month iityLevel_| abilityLevel_| Level gate gate
Penultimate | Last Day
Level Level Limi Into (4) | Into (2)
Contracts Contracts
Rule 9.2 Rule
Rule 9.26 A 9.27 Rule 9.34
Rule 9.27A Re 1.27)
Metals
USA
NYMEX
Platinum
Option 200
Contract 360 PO 20,000 NA 5025 | PL
Case 1:07-cv-05806-JSR Document 2 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6772
G. ARTIS-BEY X, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. M. JADE, Chief Warden, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-96-29) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. G. Artis-Bey X, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advisedAppellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate reviewby failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 26 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 26 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 2