alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Stephen Squires, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quantum Materials Corp.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





November 14, 2013

/s/ STEPHEN SQUIRESStephen Squires, Principal Executive Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 183 

To clarify the United States interest in certain submerged lands in the 

area of the Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. KEATING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To clarify the United States interest in certain submerged 

lands in the area of the Monomoy National Wildlife 

Refuge, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNITED STATES INTEREST IN CERTAIN SUB4 MERGED LANDS. 

5 The Congress finds that the United States did not 

6 acquire any right, title, or interest in or to submerged 

7 lands in Nantucket Sound or the waters above such sub8 merged lands as a result of the taking described in United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 183 IH

1 States v. 3,000 Acres of Land, Misc. Civil Action No. 

2 6340 (D. Mass., dated June 1, 1944). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Ronald D. Mogel, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 8, 2008



/s/ Ronald D. MogelRonald D. MogelSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




34
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman Lee TATE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6137.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Herman Lee Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Kimlani M. Ford, Assistant United States Attorney Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

*253Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part, affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Herman Lee Tate seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tate has not made the requisite showing.

Tate alternatively asked the district court to grant him relief via a writ of error coram nobis. Such a writ may be used to vacate a conviction where there is a fundamental error resulting in conviction, and no other means of relief is available. *United States v. Akinsade,*686 F.3d 248, 252 (4th Cir.2012). The remedy is limited, however, to those petitioners who are no longer in custody pursuant to their convictions. *Carlisle v. United States,*517 U.S. 416, 428-29, 116 S.Ct. 1460, 134 L.Ed.2d 613 (1996); *Akinsade,*686 F.3d at 252. Therefore, because Tate is still in custody, he cannot obtain relief pursuant to a writ of coram nobis. To the extent Tate appeals the district court’s denial of coram nobis relief, we affirm this disposition.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, dismiss the appeal in part, and affirm in part. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50959 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CLAY OWEN BERGMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-97-CR-281-ALL-EP

- - - - - - - - - - August 25, 1999 Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Clay Owen Bergman appeals from his conviction and resultant sentence for the manufacture of marijuana. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for manufacturing in excess of 100 marijuana plants, that the district court erred in the amount of drugs it attributed to him for sentencing purposes, and that the court’s Allen charge was deficient. We have reviewed the record and find no reversibleNo. 98-50959 -2- error. Drug quantities are not an element of a § 841(a) offense;

drug quantities are relevant only at sentencing. See United States v. Watch , 7 F.3d 422, 426-27 (5th Cir. 1993). The evidence was sufficient to support Bergman’s conviction for manufacturing marijuana. See United States v. Martinez , 975 F.2d 159, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1992). Further, the district court’s determination that Bergman should be held responsible for 510 marijuana plants was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Maseratti , 1 F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1993). Finally, the court’s Allen charge was not deficient. See United States v. Winters , 105 F.3d 200, 203-04 (5th Cir. (1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                                      11

<PAGE>

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                   CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2001-HYB1
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-HYB1


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Washington Mutual Bank, FA. (the "Servicer") and do hereby further certify
pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i)  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
     calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement
     has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
     has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such
     year.




/s/ Gabriel Barroso                                  Dated: March 25, 2002

GABRIEL BARROSO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ John MacLean                                     Dated: March 25, 2002

JOHN MACLEAN
VICE PRESIDENT



                                      12
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-01-019]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

International Trade Commission. 

# TIME AND DATE: 

May 16, 2001 at 11 a.m. 

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

                        Open to the public.                               ( print page 23731)    

## Matters To Be Considered: 

1. Agenda for future meeting: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-414 and 731-TA-928 (Preliminary) (Softwood Lumber from Canada)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on May 17, 2001; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on May 24, 2001.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: 

1. Document No. GC-01-042: Regarding Inv. No. 337-TA-429 (Certain Bar Clamps, Bar Clamp Pads, and Related Packaging, Display, and Other Materials). 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 4, 2001.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11827 Filed 5-7-01; 2:16 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0400 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0400

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases (16056/5/2004 - C6-0221/2005 - 2003/0189A(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 272 E , 09/11/2006 P. 0381 - 0393 *

P6_TA(2005)0400

Fluorinated greenhouse gases ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases (16056/5/2004 — C6-0221/2005 — 2003/0189A(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (16056/5/2004 — C6-0221/2005) [1],

- having regard to its position at first reading [2] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2003)0492) [3],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0301/2005),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 183 E, 26.7.2005, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 103 E, 29.4.2004, p. 600.

[3] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
cme @

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

20 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-7499
www.cme.com

August 1, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb
Office of the Secretariat
Commodity Futures Trading Commission a
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21* Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581

RE: CME Rules 230/., 552.B. and 912
Submission No. 05-75

Ze Md

Dear Ms. Webb:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME” or “Exchange") hereby notifies the Commission that
the Exchange has approved changes to Rule 230/j., Rule 552.B. and Rule 912 as they relate to CME's
Board of Director's approval practices. The amended rules are effective immediately.

The amendments to these rules are shown with additions underscored and deletions lined out.

The Exchange certifies that this regulatory advisory neither violates nor is inconsistent with any
provision of the Commodity Exchange Act or of the rules and regulations thereunder.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (312) 648-5422.

Sincerely,

/S/ Stephen M. Szarmack
Director and Associate General Counsel

‘SMS/elm/5388 SUB 05-75.dco


230.

552.

912.

GENERAL

j. Make and amend the Rules of the Exchange; provided, the Board has also and;
as-necessary; delegated such authority to make and amend the Rules of the
Exchange te-4}-the- Executive-Committee,or 2) to the Chairman of the Board, the
Presidentand-the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating
Officer acting together; and

DUAL TRADING RESTRICTIONS
552.B. Prohibition

Dual trading shall be prohibited in any contract month which is deemed a mature
liquid contract by management the-Board-of Directors subject to the exceptions in
Section C. below.

APPROVAL

An applicant for clearing membership receiving a majority vote of the full membership
of the Clearing House Risk Committee shall be approved effective immediately

An applicant that fails to receive a majority vote shall be informed by the Clearing
House Risk Committee chairman and shall have 10 days thereafter to file an appeal
to the Board seeking further consideration. The Board may approve the applicant by
a majority vote if it is satisfied that the Clearing House Risk Committee's decision
was Clearly erroneous or unreasonable.
# EUR-Lex - 52004XC0330(03) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004XC0330(03)

**Amendment by France of public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services within France **

*
Official Journal C 079 , 30/03/2004 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Amendment by France of public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services within France

(2004/C 79/04)

1. Pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, France has decided to amend the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Aurillac and Paris (Orly) published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 385/09 of 11 December 1998.

2. From 1 July 2004, the public service obligations are as follows:

Minimum frequency

The minimum level of service provided must be two return trips a day from Monday to Thursday inclusive, and three return trips on Friday, 225 working days a year. During the rest of the year, there must be one return trip a day from Monday to Friday inclusive, excluding public holidays.

Services must be operated without a stopover between Paris (Orly) and Aurillac.

Type of aircraft used and capacity provided

Services must be operated with a pressurised turboprop or jet aircraft having a seating capacity of at least 19.

Timetables

During the periods where at least two return trips a day are required, timetables must be such as to enable passengers on business trips to make the round trip within the day and to spend at least seven hours in Aurillac and at least eight hours in Paris.

Flight bookings

Flights must be marketed using at least one computerised reservation system.

Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 3 % of the number of flights scheduled in any year.

The carrier must give six months' notice before discontinuing these services.

3. Slots are currently reserved at Paris (Orly) airport for the scheduled Paris (Orly)-Aurillac service pursuant to Article 9 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports. Air carriers interested in this route can obtain information about these slots from the Paris airports coordinator.
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

JESSE DRAKE and SUSAN DRAKE,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-05353-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 42 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 11, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 42 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 8 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 1