alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3883-3884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1185]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-43, MM Docket No. 00-179, RM-9947]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Arkadelphia, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Arkansas Educational 
Television Commission, licensee of noncommercial educational station 
KETG(TV), substitutes DTV *13 for DTV channel *46 at Arkadelphia. See 
65 FR 59389, October 5, 2000. DTV channel *13 can be allotted to 
Arkadelphia in compliance with the principle community coverage 
requirements of Section 73.625(a) at reference coordinates (33-54-26 N. 
and 93-06-46 W.) with a power of 7.3, HAAT of 320.9 meters and with a 
DTV service population of 277 thousand. With is action, this proceeding 
is terminated.

DATES: Effective February 26, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report

[[Page 3884]]

and Order, MM Docket No. 00-179, adopted January 10, 2001, and released 
January 11, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under Arkansas, is amended by removing DTV channel *46 and adding DTV 
channel *13 at Arkadelphia.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-1185 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
Exhibit 10.3


                              AMENDATORY AGREEMENT


     This Amendatory Agreement (the "Agreement") is dated December 13, 2005 and
is between Duluth Venture Capital Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability
company ("Duluth") and Equicap, Inc. ("Company") with respect to a certain
non-interest bearing payable of Equicap, Inc. in the aggregate amount of
$132,912 ("Payable").

     Section 1. Acknowledgement. Company confirms the validity of the Payable
and that Duluth is recognized as the owner of the Payable on the records of the
Company.

     Section 2. Conversion. Company and Equicap agree to convert the Payable,
effective on the date hereof, into a convertible promissory note in the form
attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement. Equicap represents and warrants that
(a) it has outstanding on the date hereof 390,100 shares of its common stock and
no shares of preferred stock and (b) there are not outstanding any options,
warrants or other rights to acquire Equicap common or preferred shares.

     Section 3. Beneficial Ownership. Duluth represents that the beneficial
owner of its ownership interests is William H. Wilkinson.

     Section 4. Miscelleaneous. No waiver of any breach or default of this
Agreement by Consultant shall be considered to be a waiver of any other breach
or default of this Agreement. Should any litigation be commenced between Duluth
and Company for such breach, the party prevailing in such litigation shall be
entitled, in addition to such other relief that may be granted, to a reasonable
sum as and for their or his or its attorney's fees and costs in such litigation.
Every provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any term or
provision hereof is determined to be illegal or invalid for any reason
whatsoever, said illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the
remainder of this Agreement. The interpretation of this Agreement shall be
governed by the local law of the State of Colorado. This Agreement contains the
entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter
thereof. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their
successors and assigns.


EQUICAP, INC.                                        DULUTH VENTURE CAPITAL
                                                     PARTNERS, LLC

/s/  Stephen M. Siedow                              /s/  William H. Wilkinson
----------------------------                        ----------------------------
Stephen M. Siedow                                    William H. Wilkinson
President                                            Managing Member
Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP     Document 15      Filed 09/10/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP     Document 15      Filed 09/10/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 26 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 26 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

May 11, 2015

Hon. Sterling Harmon

Appellate Division Chief

219 North 6th Street, Suite 200

Waco, TX 76701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Abelino (Abel) Reyna

McLennan County District Attorney

219 N. 6th Street, Suite 200

Waco, TX 76701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Doyle Lynn Young

100 N. 6th Street, Ste. 313

Waco, TX 76701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00038-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 2011-2499-C1

Style: Allan Latoi Story v. The State of Texas

Appellant’s motion for leave to file brief in the above cause was this day 

GRANTED by this Court. The brief has been ordered filed as of May 11, 2015, the date 

of receipt.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott MacCaughern, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Scott MacCaughernPrincipal Executive Officer Date: September 21, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION AS OF AND FOR SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999  EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001045710
<NAME> FrontierVision  Holdings, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  6,266
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          14,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                             (825)
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       23,257
<PP&E>                                            363,434 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,211,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  49,558
<BONDS>                                             1,142,826
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                             (1,093)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1,211,350
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      146,713
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          78,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        3,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     52,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (40,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (39,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (39,294)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0


<FN>
<F1> PP&E IS SHOWN NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION.
</FN>




</TABLE>
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*SCOTT JACOBSON

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 440 (AC 23983), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the improper introduction of fifty-three photographs, testimony regarding a ziplock bag of hair and testimony regarding the defendant’s prior misconduct constituted harmless error?”

*929The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17415.

*Norman A. Pattis,*in support of the petition.

*Frederick W. Fawcett,*supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 21, 2005
Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 4      Filed 07/13/2007     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21.1
 September 15, 2009
 NAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    STATE/PROVINCE OF ORGANIZATIONBerwyn Magnetic Resonance Center, L.L.C.
    
    IllinoisComprehensive Medical Imaging, Inc.
    
    DelawareComprehensive Medical Imaging Centers, Inc.
    
    DelawareEncinitas Imaging Center, LLC
    
    CaliforniaEast Bay Medical Imaging, LLC
    
    CaliforniaGarfield Imaging Center, Ltd.
    
    CaliforniaInSight Health Corp.
    
    DelawareInSight Health Services Corp.
    
    DelawareInSight-Premier Health, LLC
    
    MaineInSight ProScan, LLC
    
    OhioKessler Imaging Associates, LLC
    
    New JerseyMaxum Health Services Corp.
    
    DelawareOpen MRI, Inc.
    
    DelawareOrange County Regional PET Center-Irvine, LLC
    
    CaliforniaParkway Imaging Center, LLC
    
    NevadaSignal Medical Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareValencia MRI, LLC
    
    California
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Revised Land and Resource Management Plan, Wasatch-Cache National 
Forest, Utah

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of preliminary availability to release a draft 
environmental impact statement in conjunction with revision of the Land 
and Resource Management Plan for the Wasatch-Cache National Forest 
located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Duchesne, Morgan, Rich, Salt Lake, 
Summit, Tooele, Wasatch, and Weber counties, Utah; and Uinta County, 
Wyoming.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service will release a 
Draft Environmental Impact Statement in conjunction with a revision of 
the Land and Resource Management Plan (hereinafter referred to as 
Proposed Forest Plan) for the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Documents 
will be transmitted to the public on or before May 9, 2001. With 
publication of this notice, the Forest will meet the requirements of 
the NFMA planning regulations issued in November, 2000 to allow 
completion of the Proposed Forest Plan under the 1982 Planning 
Regulations (36 CFR part 219). An electronic version of the documents 
is being posted on the forest website, www.fs.fed.us/wcnf/, and will be 
available on or before May 4, 2001.

DATES: Comments concerning the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and 
Proposed Forest Plan should be received in writing 120 days from the 
date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the Notice of 
Availability in the Federal Register (estimated to be May 18, 2001).

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Tom Tidwell, Forest Supervisor, 
Wasatch-Cache National Forest, 8236 Federal Building, 125 South State 
Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84138.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Blackwell, Planning Team 
Leader, Wasatch-Cache National Forest (801) 524-3908.
    Responsible official: Jack Blackwell, Intermountain Regional 
Forester, at 324 25th Street, Ogden, UT 84401.

    Dated: May 3, 2001.
Jack G. Troyer,
Deputy Regional Forester.
[FR Doc. 01-11613 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB     Document 8      Filed 07/27/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05551-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Songzai International Holding Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hongwen Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Hongwen LiHongwen LiChief Executive Officer





Dated: June 21, 2010
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 45 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 45 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 45 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of GSGSB v Borsari Company.

Respondent is directed to physically deliver to petitioner certain documents as enumerated in the order of this court, or, in the alternative, an affidavit as indicated in said order; failure of respondent to comply with the directive contained in this court’s order shall render said respondent in willful contempt of an order of this court. Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Technology, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Stanley McCrosky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pacific Technology, Inc., and will be retained by Pacific
Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



/s/ Stanley McCrosky
--------------------------
Stanley McCrosky
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 27 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 27 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-------------------------------------------------------------X 

NOVELLA JOHNSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 -againstCITY OF NEW YORK, METROPOLITAN 

TRANSIT AUTHORITY, MANHATTAN AND 

BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING 

AUTHORITY, AND DAVID COLLUM 

 Defendants. 

-------------------------------------------------------------X 

Index Number: 07 CV 5805 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Francine Menaker, an attorney of record for the 

defendants, Metropolitan Transit Authority (“MTA”) and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit 

Operating Authority (“MABSTOA”) and requests that copies of all notices and other papers in 

this action be served on the undersigned at the e-mail address, and the mailing address, stated 

below. 

Dated: Brooklyn, New York 

 November 1, 2007 

 Yours, etc., 

 /s/Francine Menaker

 Francine Menaker (FM8732) 

 Office of the General Counsel 

 New York City Transit Authority 

 130 Livingston Street, 12th Floor 

 Brooklyn, New York 11201 

 (718) 694-3891 

 francine.menaker@nyct.com

Case 1:07-cv-05805-RJS-AJP Document 4 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6**  **438**

JERRY E. BOYD , P etitioner

- Appella nt ,
v. DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Gerald Bruce Lee , District Judge. ( 1 :1 4

- c v - 00 381

- GBL

- IDD )

Submitted : May 21, 2015 Decided: May 27, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Jerry E. Boyd , Appellant Pro Se
. Kathleen Beatty Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jerry E. Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district c ourt’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boyd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the a ppeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the quarterly report of GelTech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Hull, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 13, 2008

| |     |                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ MICHAEL HULL                                     
| |     | Michael Hull                                         
| |     | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)