alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         414
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,506
<INVENTORY>                                    9,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,757
<PP&E>                                         1,939,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,062,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,118,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,481
<BONDS>                                        198,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       72,530
<OTHER-SE>                                     442,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,118,044
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               828,118
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  481,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             21,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                188,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                   70,107
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            118,178
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,085)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   114,093
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tina BELCASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-4907.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 15, 2013.

Decided: May 30, 2013.

Charles T. Berry, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellant. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DAVIS, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tina Belcastro appeals her conviction and eight-month sentence imposed pursuant to her guilty plea to distributing Bu-prenorphine with 1000 feet of public housing. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but questioning whether the district court erred by not sentencing Belcas-tro to a lower sentence and by providing inadequate explanation for the sentence. Neither Belcastro nor the Government has filed a brief. After a review of the entire record, we affirm.

Belcastro was released from prison on February 15, 2013, to serve her three-year supervised release term. Thus, there is no longer any live controversy regarding the length of Belcastro’s confinement, and her challenge to the length of her prison term is therefore moot. *See Sibron v. New York,*392 U.S. 40, 55-56, 88 S.Ct. 1889, 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968); *United States v. Tapia-Marquez,*361 F.3d 535, 537 (9th cir.2004). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in part, insofar as it challenges the length of Belcastro’s prison sentence.

We have reviewed the remainder of the record in accordance with *Anders,*and we find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Belcastro’s conviction as well as her term of supervised release. This court requires that counsel inform *274Belcastro in writing of her right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Belcastro requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Belcastro. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.*
**Exhibit 23(a)** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statements on    Form S-8    pertaining to the 1984 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Stock Option    Plan and the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated    February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated    financial statements and schedules of Bancinsurance Corporation    and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2007. /s/  Daszkal    Bolton LLP    Boca Raton, Florida     March 5, 2008
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification regarding 

the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance may be transferred under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2019 

Mr. FOSTER (for himself and Mrs. RODGERS of Washington) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification regarding the children to whom entitlement to 

educational assistance may be transferred under the 

Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GI Education Benefits 

5 Fairness Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1718 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE CHILDREN TO 

2 WHOM ENTITLEMENT TO EDUCATIONAL AS3 SISTANCE MAY BE TRANSFERRED UNDER 

4 THE POST 9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3319(c) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(c) ELIGIBLE DEPENDENTS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) TRANSFER.—An individual approved to 

10 transfer an entitlement to educational assistance 

11 under this section may transfer the individual’s enti12 tlement as follows: 

13 ‘‘(A) To the individual’s spouse. 

14 ‘‘(B) To one or more of the individual’s 

15 children. 

16 ‘‘(C) To a combination of the individuals 

17 referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B). 

18 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION OF CHILDREN.—For purposes 

19 of this subsection, the term ‘children’ includes de20 pendents described in section 1072(2)(I) of title 

21 10.’’. 

22 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub23 section (a) shall apply with respect to educational assist24 ance payable under chapter 33 of title 38, United States 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1718 IH

1 Code, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of 

2 this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                             JONES INTERCABLE, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Evergreen Intercable, Inc.
International Aviation, Ltd.
Jones Cable Corporation
Jones Cable Holdings, Inc.
Jones Communications of Colorado, Inc.
Jones Communications of Virginia, Inc.
Jones Electronic Manufacturing Services, Inc.
Jones Futurex, Inc.
Jones Galactic Radio, Inc.
Jones Galactic Radio Partners, Inc.
The Jones Group, Ltd.
Jones Intercable Funds, Inc.
Jones Intercable of Ft. Myers, Inc.
Jones Intercable of Hawaii, Inc.
Jones Intercable of Leeds, Inc.
Jones Intercable of San Diego, Inc.
Jones Intercable of South Hertfordshire, Inc.
Jones of Wisconsin, Inc.
Jones Panorama Properties, Inc.
Jones Programming Services, Inc.
Jones Satellite Networks, Inc.
Jones Satellite Programming, Inc.
Jones Spacelink Acquisition Corporation
Jones Spacelink Cable Corporation
Jones Spacelink Management, Inc.
Jones Spacelink Opportunities, Inc.
Jones Spacelink Spanish Investments, Inc.
Jones Telecommunications of Virginia, Inc.
Jones Tri-City Intercable, Inc.
Jones U.K. Holdings, Inc.
Saturn Cable T.V., Inc.
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, R. Ray Bell, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tidelands Royalty Trust “B”; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s Trustee and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theregistrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s Trustee and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: March 29, 2005 /s/ R. RAY BELL   R. Ray Bell   Principal Accounting Officer
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 39-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 26
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1812 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1812

     To amend title 38, United States Code, to furnish Vet Center 
 readjustment counseling and related mental health services to certain 
                              individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2019

Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. Levin of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 38, United States Code, to furnish Vet Center 
 readjustment counseling and related mental health services to certain 
                              individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vet Center Eligibility Expansion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF VET CENTER SERVICES.

    Section 1712A of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``clauses (i) through (iv)'' both places it 
        appears and inserting ``clauses (i) through (vi)'';
            (2) by striking ``in clause (v)'' both places it appears 
        and inserting ``in clause (vii)'';
            (3) in subsection (a)(1)(C)--
                    (A) by redesignating clauses (iv) and (v) as 
                clauses (vi) and (vii), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after clause (iii) the following 
                new clauses:
            ``(iv) Any individual who is a veteran or member of the 
        Armed Forces, including a member of a reserve component of the 
        Armed Forces, who served--
                    ``(I) on active service in response to a national 
                emergency or major disaster declared by the President; 
                or
                    ``(II) in the National Guard of a State under 
                orders of the chief executive of that State in response 
                to a disaster or civil disorder in such State.
            ``(v) Any individual who participated in a drug 
        interdiction operation as a member of the Coast Guard, 
        regardless of the location of that operation.''; and
            (4) in subsection (h), by adding at the end the following 
        new paragraphs:
            ``(4) The term `active service' has the meaning given that 
        term in section 101 of title 10.
            ``(5) The term `civil disorder' has the meaning given that 
        term in section 232 of title 18.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Parvis Noghrey, Appellant, v Henrietta Acampora et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Brookhaven, et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*for a judgment declaring unconstitutional Local Laws, 1987, No. 2 of the Town of Brookhaven (the Building Moratorium Law, amending Brookhaven Town Code ch 17), and for damages, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), entered February 10, 1988, which denied his motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants summary judgment dismissing the complaint and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated June 6, 1988, as, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered February 10, 1988 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 6, 1988, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 6, 1988 is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

Pursuant to Local Laws, 1987, No. 2 of the Town of Brook-haven, the town placed a moratorium for six months on certain development within the town while its master plan was being updated. In our view, this moratorium "was a reasonable measure designed to temporarily halt development while the town considered comprehensive zoning changes and was therefore a valid stopgap or interim zoning measure” *(Matter of Dune Assocs. v Anderson,*119 AD2d 574, 575; *see also, Matter of Charles v Diamond,*41 NY2d 318; *Matter of Lakeview Apts, v Town of Stanford,*108 AD2d 914). Furthermore, contrary to the plaintiff’s argument, the record contains *661no "special facts” which would except this case from the general rule that a case must be decided on the law as it exists at the time of the decision *(Matter of Mascony Transp. & Ferry Serv. v Richmond,*71 AD2d 896, *affd*49 NY2d 969; *Matter of West Lane Props, v Lombardi,*139 AD2d 748).

We have reviewed the plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them to be without merit *(Matter of West Lane Props, v Lombardi, supra; Tilles Inv. Co. v Town of Huntington,*137 AD2d 118, 122, *lv granted*73 NY2d 709; *First Lutheran Church v Los Angeles County,*482 US 304; *cf., Turnpike Woods v Town of Stony Point,*70 NY2d 735).

We note that since this is a declaratory judgment action, the judgment, when entered, should contain a declaration that Local Laws, 1987, No. 2 of the Town of Brookhaven is constitutional *(see, Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334, *appeal dismissed*371 US 74, *cert denied*371 US 901). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
November 17, 2005

BY EMAIL AND FACSIMILE
Office of the Secretariat
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581 re —
- ~~
Re: NYMEX Submission 05.208: Notification of Change in the Execuition :

Platform for the NYMEX miNYTM Energy Futures Contractg:from.the
CME® Globex® System to the NYMEX ClearPort® Trading Platfgem.

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange" is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of a change in the
execution platform of the NYMEX miNY energy futures contracts from CME® Globex® to the
Exchange’s ClearPort® Trading system. This transition from the CME® Globex® platform to the
ClearPort® Trading system will be effective beginning on Sunday, November 20, 2005 for trade
date of Monday, November 21, 2005.

For the transition, the two NYMEX miNY energy futures contracts will follow the regular
schedule for listing the nearby or next month futures contract month ten business days before the
front month futures contract expires.

NYMEX miNYTM Crude Oil

¢ The December NYMEX miNY Crude futures will expire on the Globex® trading system
at 2:30 PM EST on Thursday, November 17",

e The January NYMEX miNY Crude futures will cease trading on Globex® at 2:30 PM
EST on Friday, November 18" and then be delisted from being traded on that system.

e The January NYMEX miNY Crude futures will then transfer from the Globex® trading
system and be listed for and commence trading on the NYMEX ClearPort® Trading
system at 7:00 PM EST on Sunday, November 20" for trade date Monday, November
21".



NYMEX miNYTM Natural Gas

e The December and January NYMEX miNY Natural Gas futures will cease trading on
Globex® on at 2:30 PM EST on Friday, November 18" and then be delisted from being
traded on that system.

e The December and January NYMEX miNY Natural Gas futures will then transfer from
the Globex® Trading system and be listed for and commence trading on the NYMEX
ClearPort® Trading system at 7:00 PM EST on Sunday, November 20" for trade date
Monday, November 21%.

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the
Exchange hereby certifies that the changes to the execution platform for the NYMEX miNY
energy futures contracts comply with the Act, including regulations under the Act, and will
commence trading on the NYMEX ClearPort® platform beginning with trade date of Monday,
November 21, 2005.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Dan Brusstar, Director,
Research, at (212) 299-2604; or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2390.

Very truly yours,

Robert A. Levin
Senior Vice President, Research
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0267 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0267

**European parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures to safeguard security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment (COM(2003)0740 - C5-0643/2003 - 2003/0301(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 157 E , 06/07/2006 P. 0061 - 0062 *

P6_TA(2005)0267

Security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment ***I

European parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures to safeguard security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment (COM(2003)0740 — C5-0643/2003 — 2003/0301(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2003) 0740) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5-0643/2003),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0099/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 1:07-cv-05769-AKH     Document 3      Filed 06/29/2007     Page 1 of 1