alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        09 June 2023    

#                     Fleet Battle Problem 2023-1 commences; focuses on integrated maritime capabilities with U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps                 

                NORFOLK, Va. - U.S. Fleet Forces Command and U.S. Marine Forces Command will conduct Fleet Battle Problem 2023 (FBP 23-1) June 9-13 on land and off the coast of Camp Lejeune, North Carolina and the Virginia Capes to further develop integrated maritime capabilities with the II Marine Expeditionary            

        14 July 2022    

#                     Fleet Commanders Vow to Improve Accuracy, Timeliness of Sailors’ Pay                 

                The four-star commanders of Naval Forces Europe-Africa, U.S. Fleet Forces Command and U.S. Pacific Fleet have released a joint directive that aims to quickly improve the timeliness and accuracy of Sailors’ pay.            

        12 January 2022    

#                     Fleet Forces Delivers Remarks at SNA 2022                 

                Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, Adm. Daryl Caudle, spoke at the Surface Navy Association’s 34th Annual National Symposium in Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2022.            

        30 April 2021    

#                     CNIC, USFFC to Conduct Hurricane/Disaster Response Exercise                 

                HURREX/CG 21 is conducted over a two-week period with this year's exercise running from May 3-14. The first week simulates a storm system along U.S. Atlantic coast and the second week shifts focus to procedures for recovery from severe weather events.The annual hurricane preparedness/disaster            

        05 March 2021    

#                     Naval Surface Force Atlantic Holds Change of Command Ceremony                 

                Commander, Naval Surface Force Atlantic (SURFLANT), held a change of command ceremony aboard the amphibious transport dock ship USS Mesa Verde (LPD 19), March 5.            

        01 February 2021    

#                     Fleet Forces, Installations Conduct Force Protection Exercise                 

                The Navy is conducting a series of security exercises nationwide to enhance the readiness of its security forces Feb. 1-12.            

        18 September 2020    

#                     USFFC Commander Delivers Remarks at ASNE Virtual Fleet Maintenance, Modernization Symposium                 

                Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) delivered the keynote address and answered questions Sept. 17, 2020, at the 2020 American Society of Naval Engineers’ (ASNE) Virtual Fleet Maintenance and Modernization Symposium.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
## Breadcrumb

-  Earthquake Science Center 

#           Earthquake Science Center Campus Video      

      By Earthquake Science Center

-  Home 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 

This short, 7-minute video gives an overview of the USGS Earthquake Science Center (ESC) in Menlo Park, California. It briefly introduces you to the San Francisco Bay Area, shows the campus and facilities, and includes interviews with scientists describing their work. Note: ESC has relocated to Moffett Field in Mountain View, about 8 miles south of Menlo Park.

View Video
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Folk Arts Section (Creativity and Organizational Capacity categories) will be held from 9 a.m.-4:30 p.m. on Friday, June 8, 2001 in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

This meeting is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 12, 2000, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.

Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

Dated: August 4, 2001.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 01-12052  Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC     Document 20      Filed 08/10/2007     Page 1 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC     Document 20      Filed 08/10/2007     Page 2 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC     Document 20      Filed 08/10/2007     Page 3 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC     Document 20      Filed 08/10/2007     Page 4 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC     Document 20      Filed 08/10/2007     Page 5 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC     Document 20      Filed 08/10/2007     Page 6 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC     Document 20      Filed 08/10/2007     Page 7 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC     Document 20      Filed 08/10/2007     Page 8 of 8
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6450

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

STEPHEN L. RUSSELL, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:08-cv-02037-CCB; 1:07-cr-00361-CCB-1) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Stephen L. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Welsh, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Stephen L. Russell seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Russell has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,167,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,891,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,059,633
<PP&E>                                      18,516,016
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,550,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,303,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,924,226
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,568,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,303,214
<SALES>                                     29,415,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,415,333
<CGS>                                       24,801,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,842,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             412,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,914,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,914,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,891,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 27 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 27 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes On Earth Episode 22 - Meet the Mendenhall Fellow      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we hear about one scientist’s journey from USGS Mendenhall fellow to full-time USGS researcher.

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: The Mendenhall Program offers a range of two-year post-doctoral research fellowships within the U.S. Geological Survey. Heather Tollerud took advantage of the program in 2015 to study drought and land cover at the USGS EROS Center, and has since become a key player in the Center’s innovative Land Change Monitoring, Assessment and Projection (LCMAP) initiative. In this episode, we hear how Dr. Tollerud went from studying the harsh playas of northwestern Nevada to leading research and development for a national-scale project at the USGS. We also hear about a current Mendenhall fellowship opportunity that’s seeking a postdoctoral researcher to join the LCMAP team.

**Guests**: Heather Tollerud, Research Physical Scientist, USGS EROS

**Host**: John Hult

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: April 14, 2020

**More on LCMAP and the Mendenhall Research Fellowship Program**: 
                            - USGS Land Change, Monitoring, Assessment and Projection
                            - USGS Mendenhall Fellowship Program
                            - LCMAP Promises New Insight on Land Surface Change

### Contacts
Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 15.1
 
 KPMG LLP
    
    Telephone
    
    (604) 691-3000Chartered Accountants
    
    Fax
    
    (604) 691-3031PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street
    
    Internet
    
    www.kpmg.caVancouver BC V7Y 1K3Canada
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
  
    
    Auditors Report to the Shareholders dated February 11, 2009 on the consolidated
balance sheets of the Company as at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated
statements of earnings and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008;
    
    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 11, 2009 on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008; and
    
    Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada  U.S. Reporting Differences dated May
14, 2009.
  
 
 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadianmember firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1601 

To allow States to elect to observe daylight savings time for the duration 

of the year, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To allow States to elect to observe daylight savings time 

for the duration of the year, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Daylight Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. OPTIONAL YEAR-LONG APPLICATION OF DAYLIGHT 

6 SAVINGS TIME. 

7 Section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 

8 U.S.C. 260a) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘or may by law apply the ad10 vancement of time described in this section for the 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1601 IH

1 duration of the year,’’ after ‘‘may by law exempt 

2 itself from the provisions of this subsection providing 

3 for the advancement of time,’’; 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘the standard time otherwise 

5 applicable during that period’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

6 same standard time’’; 

7 (3) by striking ‘‘may by law exempt either the 

8 entire State as provided in (1) or’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

9 by law, may apply either standard time provided for 

10 in paragraph (1) to the entire State,’’; and 

11 (4) by inserting ‘‘, or may apply the advance12 ment of time for the duration of the year to the en13 tire area of the State lying within any time zone’’ 

14 before the period at the end. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph D. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                       of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph D. Moore                             Joseph D. MooreExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerNovember 12, 2003
(84 South. 925)

#### Ex parte NOLAN.

(3 Div. 425.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1919.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Barnes & Walker, of Opelika, for appellant.

Horace Stringfellow, of Montgomery, for appellee.

GARDNER, J.

Petition of Jack Nolan, by his next friend, Mrs. S. J. Nolan, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court, rendered in the cause of Jack Nolan, pro ami, v. J. M. Starke, 84 South. 398. Writ denied.
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4857

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MAURICE LASHAWN MELVIN, a/k/a Maurice Leshawn Melvin,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:12-cr-00323-F-1)

Submitted: June 24, 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Eric J. Brignac, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer 

P. May-Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States

Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Lashawn Melvin pled guilty, pursuant to a 

written plea agreement, to possessing a firearm after being 

convicted of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 

924 (2012). He was sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal 

Act (“ACCA”) to 159 months in prison.*

 The sole claim Melvin 

raises on appeal is whether the sentencing court erred in 

determining that his prior North Carolina convictions for 

conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon constitute 

predicate offenses under the ACCA. 

We review de novo a district court’s determination of 

whether prior offenses qualify as violent felonies for purposes 

of the ACCA. United States v. Hemingway, 734 F.3d 323, 331 (4th 

Cir. 2013). Melvin does not contest that the substantive North 

Carolina offense of robbery with a dangerous weapon is a violent 

felony under the ACCA. Rather, he contends that a conspiracy 

conviction cannot categorically operate as a predicate felony 

for ACCA purposes because conspiracy does not require an overt 

act. 

Circuit precedent forecloses Melvin’s argument 

challenging his sentence under the ACCA. See United States v. 

 * He received a downward departure below the mandatory 

statutory minimum pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 5K1.1 (2012). 
3

White, 571 F.3d 365, 371 (4th Cir. 2009) (holding North Carolina 

conviction for conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous 

weapon constitutes a predicate violent felony under ACCA). We 

therefore reject Melvin’s claim. See Scotts Co. v. United 

Indus. Corp., 315 F.3d 264, 271 n.2 (4th Cir. 2002) (noting that 

a panel of this court cannot explicitly or implicitly overrule 

circuit precedent established by a prior panel; only the United 

States Supreme Court or this court sitting en banc may do so).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district 

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED