alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0197 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0197

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/115/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to anchorages for motor-vehicle safety belts (11933/3/2004 - C6-0030/2005 - 2003/0136(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 117 E , 18/05/2006 P. 0140 - 0140 *

P6_TA(2005)0197

Anchorages for safety belts in motor vehicles ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/115/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to anchorages for motor-vehicle safety belts (11933/3/2004 — C6-0030/2005 — 2003/0136(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (11933/3/2004 — C6-0030/2005) [1],

- having regard to its position at first reading [2] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2003)0362),

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0117/2005),

1. Approves the common position;

2. Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;

3. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

4. Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 111 E, 11.5.2005, p. 23.

[2] OJ C 91 E, 15.4.2004, p. 496.

--------------------------------------------------
Clear All

        02 May 2023    

#                     Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group Deploys                 

                The capital ship of the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group (GRFCSG), the first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78), departed Naval Station Norfolk for a routine deployment, May 2.            

        10 November 2020    

#                     Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group Commences First-ever Integrated Operations                 

                Under the leadership of Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 12, USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) along with Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 8, Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 2, CSG-12’s Air and Missile Defense Commander, Commanding Officer of USS Gettysburg (CG 64), and CSG-12’s Information Warfare Commander            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors and Stockholders


Arden Group, Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries





We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arden Group, Inc. for the year ended January 1, 2011 and to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (No. 333-46704 and 333-69787) of Arden Group, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.














/s/ Moss Adams LLP


Los Angeles, California


March 10, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRENDA LAY LYNN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, District

Judge. (CR-94-130, CA-97-29-3)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: December 23, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Brenda Lay Lynn, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying three

post-conviction motions. Insofar as appellant appeals the district

court's decision denying her motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b), we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm that order on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lynn, No. CA97-29-3 (N.D.W. Va. July 21, 1997).

Insofar as appellant seeks to appeal from the motions filed

under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) (1994) seeking a reduction in sentence

and an evidentiary hearing in that matter, the notice of appeal was

untimely. We therefore dismiss the appeal as to those motions for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "'mandatory

and jurisdictional.'" Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Criminal defendants have ten days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The only exception

to the appeal period is when the district court extends the time to

appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b) upon a showing of excusable

neglect. The district court entered its order denying the criminal

motions on July 21, 1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed in

the district court on September 2, 1997. Though the record contains

no certification of when she relayed her notice of appeal to prison

authorities for mailing to the district court, it appears that Ap-
* Appellant's § 3553(b) motion was untimely. Accordingly, we

conclude that remanding to the district court for assessment of

whether Appellant can demonstrate excusable neglect for her late

notice of appeal is not warranted.

3

pellant mailed the document on August 26, 1997, beyond the ten-day

appeal period. Appellant's failure to obtain an extension within

the prescribed time frame leaves this court without jurisdiction to

consider the merits of Appellant's appeal.* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 3 of 3
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 25, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00909-CV 

MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC AND MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, 

INC., Appellants 

V. 

JENNIFER MUSSELL, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-03437 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Molberg, and Pedersen, III 

Opinion by Justice Schenck 

Before the Court is appellants’ motion to dismiss based on the parties’ 

settlement. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), we grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

210909F.P05 

 

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC AND 

MIDLAND CREDIT 

MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellants 

No. 05-21-00909-CV V. 

JENNIFER MUSSELL, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 101st Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-03437. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Schenck. Justices Molberg and 

Pedersen, III participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 Subject to any agreement among the parties, we ORDER that appellee 

Jennifer Mussell recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Midland 

Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc. 

Judgment entered February 25, 2022.
eurex us

October 14, 2005

Mr. Edward W. Colbert .
Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOL er ay tiy GAL iitAifGth|

Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission REQUESTED

1155 21" Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581

a
fs

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Dear Mr. Colbert:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) Regulation 145.9, U.S.
Futures Exchange, LLC (“Eurex US” or “Exchange” hereby petitions the CFTC to maintain
the following information in connection with Eurex US end-user trading incentive program as
confidential until further notice as against any requestor who files with the Commission a
request to inspect such information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”).

The basis for this petition for confidential treatment is CFTC Regulation 145.9(d)(1)(ii), in
that such information contains trade secrets and confidential information. I understand that

this petition will not be evaluated by the CFTC unless and until a FOIA request has been filed
for inspection of this subject matter. In that event, please contact me at 312.544.1076.

Very truly yours,

Matt Lisle
Chief of Compliance

CC: Riva Adriance
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23928-23929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Public Information Collections Approved by Office of Management 
and Budget

May 1, 2001.
    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has received Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the following public 
information collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a 
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless 
it displays a currently valid control number. For further information 
contact Shoko B. Hair, Federal Communications Commission, (202) 418-
1379.

Federal Communications Commission

    OMB Control No.: 3060-0807.
    Expiration Date: April 30, 2004.
    Title: 47 CFR 51.803 and Supplemental Procedures for Petitions to 
Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
    Form No.: N/A.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 52 respondents; 39.2 hours per response 
(avg.); 2040 total annual burden hours (for all collections approved 
under this control number).
    Estimated Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $0.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion; Third Party Disclosure.

[[Page 23929]]

    Description: Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. section 252 and 47 CFR 51.803 
any interested party seeking preemption of a state commission's 
jurisdiction based on the state commission's failure to act shall 
notify the Commission as follows: (1) file with the Secretary of the 
Commission a detailed petition, supported by an affidavit, that states 
with specificity the basis for any claim that it has failed to act; and 
(2) serve the state commission and other parties to the proceeding on 
the same day that the party serves the petition on the Commission. 
Within 15 days of the filing of the petition, the state commission and 
parties to the proceeding may file a response to the petition. In a 
Public Notice (DA 97-2256), the Commission set out procedures for 
filing petitions for preemption pursuant to 47 U.S.C. section 
252(e)(5). All of the requirements are used to ensure that petitions 
have complied with their obligations under the Communications Act of 
1934, as amended. Obligation to respond: Required to obtain or retain 
benefits. Public reporting burden for the collection of information is 
as noted above. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any 
other aspect of the collections of information, including suggestions 
for reducing the burden to Performance Evaluation and Records 
Management, Washington, DC 20554.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11764 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Darlene Payne Smith

Appellate case number: 01-22-00353-CV

Trial court case number: 468981

Trial court: Probate Court No 2 of Harris County

Relator, Darlene Payne Smith, filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial 

court’s April 22, 2022 Order on “Robert H. Goode, Jr.’s Motion for Continuance of the Deposition 

of Robert H. Good, Jr. and Sanctions Hearing for Same Date.” In this order, the trial court required 

relator to post a bond of $225,000 by May 11, 2022, if relator’s client, Robert H. Goode, did not 

post the bond by May 9, 2022. Relator also filed a motion for emergency relief asking this Court 

to stay the trial court’s order.

The motion for emergency relief is granted and the trial court’s order of April 22, 2022 is 

stayed pending disposition of this original proceeding or other order of this Court.

The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from real party in 

interest, Stephanie McGuire, within 20 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Peter Kelly_______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___May 10, 2022____
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6007
JOHNNY D. POWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-3366-DKC) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Dean Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Powell v. Maryland , No. CA-95-3366-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



I, G. Darcy Klug, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2005

/s/    G. DARCY KLUGG. Darcy Klug Interim Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         499,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,436,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,469,578
<PP&E>                                         524,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                (190,746)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,266,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,866,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,100
<COMMON>                                     8,365,045
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,266,272
<SALES>                                      2,030,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,030,647
<CGS>                                          491,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  491,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,974,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,547,417)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,088)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,549,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (500,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,049,505)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of the Marriage of Amber Brooks and Matthew Justin Brooks and In the Interest of A.B., L.B., and E.B., Children

No. 06

- 23

- 00012

- CV Appeal from the County Court a t Law of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17D1415

- CCL ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice van Cleef

, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the cou rt below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We further order that the appellant, Matthew Justin Brooks , pay all costs incurred by

reason of t his appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 24, 2023 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Clear All

        05 December 2022    

                    Finnish Minister of Defense Visits USS Arlington in Norfolk on Same Day U.S. Destroyer Visits Helsinki                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - As Finland awaits the finalization of their NATO membership process following its May North Atlantic Treaty Organization application, the Honorable Antti Kaikkonen, Finland’s Minister of Defense, visited the San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock ship USS Arlington            

        02 December 2022    

                    USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) completes participation in Finnish exercise Freezing Winds, arrives in Helsinki                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) arrived in Helsinki, Finland, Dec. 2, 2022, marking the completion of the ship’s participation in the Finnish Navy Command-led exercise Freezing Winds 22.            

        19 August 2022    

                    Kearsarge ARG-22nd MEU completes training with Finnish Armed Forces                 
                BALTIC SEA - The USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and embarked 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) wrapped up a highly successful bilateral training opportunity with members of the Finnish Armed Forces, Aug. 18, 2022.            

        05 August 2022    

                    Kearsarge ARG-22nd MEU visits Baltic Sea allies and partners                 
                The USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and embarked 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) arrived in multiple Baltic Sea ports for scheduled port visits to allied and partner nations, August 5, 2022.            

        27 May 2022    

                    USS Gravely and USS Gunston Hall arrive in Helsinki, Finland                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Gravely (DDG 107) and Whidbey Island-class dock landing ship USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44) arrived in Helsinki, Finland for scheduled port visits, May 27, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website