alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 21.1
 September 23, 2010
 NAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    STATE/PROVINCE OF ORGANIZATIONBerwyn Magnetic Resonance Center, L.L.C.
    
    IllinoisComprehensive Medical Imaging, Inc.
    
    DelawareComprehensive Medical Imaging Centers, Inc.
    
    DelawareEncinitas Imaging Center, LLC
    
    CaliforniaEast Bay Medical Imaging, LLC
    
    CaliforniaGarfield Imaging Center, Ltd.
    
    CaliforniaInsight Health Corp.
    
    DelawareInsight Health Services Corp.
    
    DelawareInsight-Premier Health, LLC
    
    MaineInsight ProScan, LLC
    
    OhioKessler Imaging Associates, LLC
    
    New JerseyMaxum Health Services Corp.
    
    DelawareOpen MRI, Inc.
    
    DelawareOrange County Regional PET Center-Irvine, LLC
    
    CaliforniaParkway Imaging Center, LLC
    
    NevadaSignal Medical Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareValencia MRI, LLC
    
    California
EXHIBIT
                                                                            32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Megadata Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
T. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                            By: /s/ James T. Barry
                                                --------------------
                                                James T. Barry
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                January 29, 2007
143 So. 585

#### Ex parte PAULK.

3 Div. 25.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 6, 1932.

*421Brassell & Brassell, of . Montgomery, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty.' Gen., for the State.

BROWN, J.

The recital in the warrant issued by the Governor of Alabama that “His Excellency, L. G. Hardman, Governor of the State of Georgia, by requisition dated the 25th day of May, 1931, has demanded of me, as Governor of the State of Alabama, the .surrender of O. C. Paulk who, it appears, is charged by indictment in the County of Calhoun, in said State, with the crime of forgery (a duly certified copy of which said indictment accompanies said requisition) and it appearing that said O. C. Paulk has fled from justice in said State and taken refuge in the State of Alabama,” is prima facie evidence of the facts recited. Pool v. State, 16 Ala. App. 410, 78 So. 407.

From these recitals it appears that a requisition for the surrender of the petitioner has been made by the Governor of Georgia, that this demand was accompanied by a copy of the indictment duly authenticated, charging the petitioner with the offense of forgery, an offense at common law, which, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, is presumed to prevail in the state of Georgia. Donegan *&*Tabor v. Wood, 49 Ala. 242, 20 Am. Rep. 275; 12 R. C. L. 139, § 2.

This, with the presence of the Governor’s warrant in evidence, was sufficient to warrant the petitioner’s retention in custody for. removal by the agent of the state of Georgia. Barriere v. State, 142 Ala. 72, 39 So. 55.

It was not permissible for the petitioner to inquire into the merits of the charge, or to show that he had been discharged by a court of another county in the state of Georgia. Barriere v. State, supra. Non constat, the court so discharging him had no jurisdiction. This is a matter to be adjudged in the courts of Georgia.

The writ of certiorari will therefore be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ„ concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05322-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05322-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05322-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 7, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Ottawa Bancshares, Inc., Salina, Kansas; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Admire Bancshares, Inc., Emporia, Kansas, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Admire Bank, Emporia, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 8, 2001.
Jennifer J. Johnson
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-11934 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Case 1:07-cv-04193-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-04193-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-04193-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-04193-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-04193-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-04193-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 6 of 6
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1732 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1732

 To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility 
    Act of 1996 to specify that the waiver authority under such Act 
    includes the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 for purpose of construction of physical 
             barriers along border, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2019

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility 
    Act of 1996 to specify that the waiver authority under such Act 
    includes the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 for purpose of construction of physical 
             barriers along border, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Furthering American Security by 
Tempering Environmental Regulations Act'' or the ``FASTER Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER AUTHORITY TO INCLUDE THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 
              ACT OF 1969 AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973 FOR 
              PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF PHYSICAL BARRIERS ALONG 
              BORDER.

    Paragraph (1) of section 102(c) of the Illegal Immigration Reform 
and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note) is 
amended by inserting ``, including the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the Endangered Species Act of 
1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),'' after ``waive all legal 
requirements''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 40 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141754) and Amendment No. 383 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2019,
      with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in
      a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    /s/Ernst & Young, LLP

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 20, 2019
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 20 of 20
#### Thomas J. Mullen, Appellant, v Gerard Fucciollo et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Gerard Fucciollo and Priscilla Fucciollo as candidates in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1989, for the party position of Member of the Republican County Committee for the 126th Election District in the Town of Babylon, the appeal is from a judgment of the *712Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), entered August 18, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

This proceeding was properly dismissed due to the petitioner’s failure to join, as a necessary party, one of the two Commissioners constituting the Suffolk County Board of Elections or the Suffolk County Board of Elections itself *(see, Gagliardo v Colascione,*153 AD2d 710 [decided herewith]; CPLR 1001 [a]; *Matter of Oberle v Caracappa,*133 AD2d 241; *Matter of Curcio v Wolf,*133 AD2d 188).

In light of this determination, we need not reach the remaining issues raised. Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Kooper, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.3

**AMENDMENT NO. 2TOAMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

            This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment’) dated as of December 1, 2005, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), andRonald P. Soltman (the “Executive”).

            **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Amended and Restated Employment  Agreement  dated as of September 23, 2004, as amended as of December  1, 2004(collectively, the “EA”),  to secure the services of the Executive as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary; and

            **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $525,146, effective as of January 1, 2006.

            **NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:

            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided inthe EA.

            2.**        **Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby  deleted and replaced withthe following new Section 6(a):

                        “(a).*Base Salary.*  The Executive’s base salary hereunder, from September 23, 2004 to December 31,2004, shall be $495,000 per year, and from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 shall be $509,850 per year, in each case payable semi-monthly.   Effective January 1, 2006, the Executive’s base salary hereunder shall be $525,146 per year, payablesemi-monthly. The Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustments from time to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”

            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby ratified  by the Company and the Executive.

**- 2 -**

            **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by  its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year firstset forth above.

                                                                       **Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**

                                                                       By:  /s/ Joseph D. Moore                                                                                                                    Joseph D. Moore                                                                                   Executive Vice President,                                                                                   Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer

                                                                       **Executive**:

****

**                                                                       **/s/ Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                                             Ronald P. Soltman
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




TRIZEC PROPERTIES, INC.




2006 Non-Employee Director Fees and Other Compensation




     The following table sets forth the compensation payable to each non-employee director of
Trizec Properties, Inc. (“Trizec”) for his service on Trizec’s Board of Directors and its
committees. Directors who are also employees of Trizec receive no additional compensation for
serving on the Board of Directors.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual fee for serving on the Board of Directors
	 	$	70,000	(1)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual fee for Audit Committee Chairman
	 	$	10,000	(1)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual fee for Compensation Committee Chairman
	 	$	7,500	(1)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual fee for Corporate Governance Committee Chairman and
Nominating Committee Chairman
	 	$	5,000	(1)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual fee for Presiding Independent Director
	 	$	5,000	(1)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Meeting fee per Board meeting attended
	 	$	1,500	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Meeting fee per Audit Committee meeting attended
	 	$	2,500	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Meeting fee per Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance
Committee and Nominating Committee meeting attended
	 	$	1,500	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Number of restricted stock rights to be granted to each newly
elected or appointed non-employee director
	 	 	1,000	 








 




			
	(1)	 	Subject to certain exceptions, at least $45,000 of the $70,000 annual fee is payable in
the form of shares of Trizec’s common stock. A director may elect to receive any additional
amount up to the full $70,000 in shares of common stock. The annual fees that Trizec pays to
committee chairmen and the Presiding Independent Director also are payable in shares of
Trizec’s common stock, rather than cash, if the chairman or the Presiding Independent
Director, as the case may be, so elects. Meeting fees are paid in cash. Due to restrictions
contained in Trizec’s certificate of incorporation which prohibit “non-qualifying U.S.
persons” from holding shares of its common stock, all fees payable to two of its non-employee
directors who are not U.S. persons are paid solely in cash.
	 
	 	 	Trizec also reimburses its non-employee directors for expenses incurred in attending
Board and committee meetings.
mms ony

July 19, 2006 “120 AY 7: U6

UFC. OF iz SECRETARIAT
Via E-Mail

Office of the Acting Secretary
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 06.87: Notification of
Amendments to NYMEX Rules 9.26, 9.27, and 9.34 for Two New
Metal Futures Contracts.

Dear Ms. Eileen A. Donovan:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NY MEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of amendments to
NYMEX Rules 9.26, All Month/Any One Month Position Accountability; 9.27, Expiration and
Current Delivery Month Position Limits or Position Accountability; and 9.34, Reporting Levels.

Effective on August 7, 2006, these amendments include the addition of position limits,
accountability levels, and reporting levels for two new Metal Futures Contracts: NYMEX
miNYTM Platinum Futures Contract, and NYMEX miNYTM Palladium Futures Contract.
Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the
Exchange hereby certifies that the attached rule amendments comply with the Act, including
regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Anthony V.
Densieski, Senior Director, Market Surveillance, at (212) 299-2881, or Bonnie H. Yurga,
Director, Market Surveillance, at (212) 299-2879.

Very truly yours,

Thomas F, LaSala
Senior Vice President
Compliance and Risk Management
cc: Brian Regan
Nancy Minett


‘Al/Any One

Contract Name Rule__| Commodity Month Expiration |_ Reporting
Chapter Code Accountability | Month Level__| Aggregate | Aggregate
Level Limit Into (1) _| Into (2)
Rule 9.26 Rule 9.27 | Rule 9.34

Metals
NYMEX miny TM!
Platinum Futures
Contract 405 PQ 1,500 200 50 PL
NYMEX miny
Palladium
Futures Contract 406 ite) 1,000 650 25 PA
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of MRU Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
      the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






Date:
                September 28, 2007
            MRU
                HOLDINGS, INC./s/
                Vishal
                GargBy:
                Vishal GargIts:
                Chief Financial Officer