Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 97E-0465]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for Baycol and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law.  FDA has made the determination because of the submission of an application to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent that claims that human drug product.

# ADDRESSES:

Submit written comments and petitions to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD  20852.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Claudia Grillo, Regulatory Policy Staff (HFD-007), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD  20857, 301-594-5645.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed.  Under these acts, a product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive.

A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time:  A testing phase and an approval phase.  For human drug products, the testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the approval phase begins.  The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the human drug product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.  Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued) FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).

                    FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product Baycol (cerivastatin sodium).  Baycol is indicated as an adjunct to diet for the reduction of elevated total and LDL cholesterol levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia (Frederickson Types IIa and IIb) when the response to dietary restriction of saturated fat and cholesterol and other nonpharmacological measures alone has been inadequate.  Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark                           ( print page 24145)                        Office received a patent term restoration application for Baycol (U.S. Patent No. 5,006,530) from Bayer Corp., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration.  In a letter dated September 9, 1998, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of Baycol represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product.  Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.                

FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for Baycol is 2,262 days.  Of this time, 1,896 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 366 days occurred during the approval phase.  These periods of time were derived from the following dates:

1.  The date an exemption under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355) became effective:  April 19, 1991.  FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date the investigational new drug application became effective was on April 19, 1991.

2.  The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human drug product under section 505 of the act:  June 26, 1996.  FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug application (NDA) for Baycol (NDA 20-740) was initially submitted on June 26, 1996.

3.  The date the application was approved:  June 26, 1997.  FDA has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 20-740 was approved on June 26, 1997.

This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension.  However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension.  In its application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 890 days of patent term extension.

Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Dockets Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a redetermination by July 10, 2001. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by  November 7, 2001.  To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation.  (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.)  Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.

Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets Management Branch.  Three copies of any information are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy.  Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.  Comments and petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

Dated: March 7, 2001.

Jane A. Axelrad,

Associate Director for Policy, Canter for Drug Evaluation and Research.

[FR Doc. 01-11961  Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S