alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Ron Zwanziger, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  April 29, 2008 /s/ Ron Zwanziger      Ron Zwanziger
The City of San Antonio, 

Acting by and through its 

Agent City Public Service s

Fourth Court of Appeals 

San Antonio, Texas 

February 5, 2014 

No. 04-13-00142-CV

Joe A. ZUNIGA,

Appellant 

v.

THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Acting by and through its Agent City Public Service Board 

d/b/a CPS Energy, 

Appellee 

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-14216

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding 

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice 

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice 

Appellant's second unopposed request for extension of time for filing motion

for rehearing and motion for rehearing en banc is hereby GRANTED. 

_________________________________ 

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of February, 2014. 

___________________________________ 

Keith E. Hottle 

Clerk of Court
(104 So. 916)

#### J. A. ALEXANDER, Adm’r, v. J. E. LIVINGSTON et al.

(3 Div. 676.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 14, 1925.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Autauga County; George F. Smoot, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
KANSAS CITY
BOARD OF TRADE

September 26, 2006

SENT VIA E-MAIL
submissions@cftc.gov

Ms. Eileen Donovan

Secretary of the Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Submission pursuant to Commission Regulation Section 40.6(a)
Dear Ms. Donovan:

| Certification. The Kansas City Board of Trade ("KCBT”) hereby gives notification to the
Commission pursuant to Commission Regulation Section 40.6(a), of its intention to
amend Rule 2514.00 by changing the last trading day and expiration day of the
December 2007 wheat options contract. The Board of Directors, in a regular meeting
held on September 26, 2006, acting pursuant to authority granted them under Rule
2501.00, approved the aforementioned amendments. KCBT certifies to the Commission
that the amendments to Rule 2514.00 are in compliance with the Commodity Exchange
Act and the regulations thereunder.

MN. Date of Implementation. The exchange intends to make amended Rule 2514.00
effective Thursday, September 28, 2006.

iN. Substantive Opposing Views. To the knowledge of the Board of Directors and staff,
no substantive opposing views were expressed by members or others regarding
amended Rule 2514.00.

WV. Text of Amended Rule. The text of the amended Rule 2514.00 is shown as follows,
with additions underlined and deletions lined out:

2514.00 Last Day Of Trading And Expiration. **

a For options months in the ordinary cycle; no trades in options expiring in the current month
shall be made after 1:25 p.m, on the last Friday which precedes by at least 2 business days, the
first notice day for the corresponding futures contract.

db. For serial options months (months outside the ordinary cycle); no trades shall be made after 1:25
p.m. on the Friday which precedes by at least 2 business days, the last business day of the calendar
month immediately preceding the option serial month, (for example, for November serial options
contracts, the last trading day is the Friday which precedes by at least 2 business days, the last
business day in October). If such Friday is not a business day, the last day of trading shall be the
business day prior to such Friday. The option shall expire at 10:00 a.m. on the first Saturday
following the option's last day of trading.

** The last trading day and expiration day for the December 2007 wheat options contract has been

changed from Friday, November 23, 2007 and Saturday, November 24, 2007 respectively, to Tuesday,

November 20, 2007 for both the last trading day and expiration day of the contract.



Ms. Eileen Donovan
September 26, 2006
Page 2 of 2

V. Rationale for Action Taken. The Board amended Rule 2514.00 in order to minimize
holiday related scheduling issues in connection with the 2007 Thanksgiving holiday.
There is currently no open interest in the December 2007 wheat option contract.

Any questions regarding this submission should be directed to the undersigned at 816-753-
7500.

President

Ce: Rick Shilts - CFTC Washington
Tom Bloom — CFTC Kansas City
Robin Hagedom — CFTC Kansas City
Exhibit 2.2



FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER



This First Amendment to Agreement and plan of Merger (this Amendment) is made and entered into as of the
4thday of November, 2004 between enherent Corp., a Delaware corporation (enherent) and Dynax Solutions,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (Dynax).



WHEREAS,
enherent and Dynax are parties to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 12, 2004 (the Merger Agreement);



WHEREAS, enherent and Dynax each desires to amend the Merger Agreement as set forth herein.



NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Dynax and enherent agree as follows:



| | 1. | The first sentence of Section 4(b) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The entire authorized capital stock of enherent
consists of 50,000,000 enherent Shares, 1,000,000 shares of non-voting common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 enherent Preferred Shares, par value $0.001 per share, of which 18,418,854 enherent Shares are issued and outstanding,
1,849,123 enherent Shares are held in treasury and 4,250,000 enherent Preferred Shares are outstanding.



| | 2. | Section 5(d)(i) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(i) neither party nor any of such partys Subsidiaries will authorize or effect any change in its
Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, except that enherent will cause the adoption of the Bylaws shown in Exhibit B and enherent may, with the requisite vote of its stockholders, amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to
increase the authorized number of enherent Shares from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000.



| | 3. | Section 6(a) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended to add the following subsection (xvii):
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(xvii) At the Special enherent Meeting, enherents stockholders shall have approved an amendment
to enherents amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the authorized number of enherent Shares from 50,000,000 to 100,000,0000, and a certificate of amendment to enherents certificate of incorporation reflecting such
increase in authorized enherent Shares shall have been filed with the office of the Delaware Secretary of State.



| | 4. | Except as specifically set forth herein, the Merger Agreement remains unchanged.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, enherent and Dynax have executed this Amendment on the date first above written.



enherent Corp.By:

/s/ Douglas CatalanoDouglas Catalano, President and CEODynax Solutions, Inc.By:

/s/ Pamela FredettePamela Fredette, President and CEO




2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0001046001
<NAME> DELAWARE FIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,928
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,835
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,668
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         91,348
<ALLOWANCE>                                        457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,996
<DEPOSITS>                                      77,698
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,100
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,071
<LONG-TERM>                                     13,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 106,996
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,613
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  443
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,056
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,307
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,443
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,613
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      211
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    102
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         102
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        59
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.09
<LOANS-NON>                                        675
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    97
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    618
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   247
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  457
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               280
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            117
        

</TABLE>
#### TANGE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK *&*N. J. INV. CO., Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

June 4, 1894.)

Appeal from first district court. Action by Charles Tan¿e against the New York & New Jersey Investment Company. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff. and defendant appeals. Reversed. Fromme Bros., for appellant. 1. Newton Williams, for respondent.

BOOKSTAVER, J.

This action was brought to recover commissions claimed to have been earned by respondent as broker in effecting a sale of real estate, and was tried by the court with a jury. From the evidence it seems that the respondent acted- as agent for the appellant under a written contract by which he was to receive 30 per centum on all sales of real estate effected by him. The claim sued upon was for commissions on the sale of ten lots; five sold by appellant to one Linke, and five to one Reinhardt. On the trial no claim was made that these were effected by the respondent personally, but he claimed they were effected through his subagent, one Zittsler. There is nothing in the evidence that in any way connects either him or Zittsler with the sale of the five lots to Reinhardt. On the other hand, the appellant proved by Reinhardt himself that he purchased his five lots directly from the appellant, and that he never saw the respondent, nor was he induced to buy the lots through the efforts of Zittsler. While the charge of the court to the jury was fair and clear on the questions of fact raised by the testimony, it is manifest that the jury disregarded his instructions, and found a verdict as to this part of the claim without evidence to support it. As to the rive la's sold to Linke, respondent does not claim that he sold them himself, but claims through his subagent, Zittsler. ZIttsler’s testimony on the subject is very indefinite and shadowy. Besides, it was directly contradicted by the testimony offered by defendant, and we therefore think no injustice can be done in reversing the judgment entirely, and directing a new trial, with costs to the appellant.
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 20 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 20 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
144 So. 915

#### AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. OF MOBILE v. H. H. MONTGOMERY, as Superintendent of Banks, Liquidating Citizens’ Bank & Trust Company.

3 Div. 10.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 27, 1932.

Gaillard & Gaillard, of Mobile, and A. G. Seay, of Troy, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
February 14, 2007

Via E-Mail

Office of the Acting Secretary Sora
Commodity Futures Trading Commission im ~
Three Lafayette Centre : >
1155 21st Street, N.W. i)
Washington, D.C. 20581 .

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 07.19: Notification of
Housekeeping Amendments to Chapter 9, Appendix A, for the
Natural Gas Daily Option Contract.

Dear Ms. Eileen Donovan:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of amendments to
Chapter 9, Appendix A, for the Natural Gas Daily Option Contract.

Chapter 9, Appendix (A) has been amended to correctly reflect the expiration account-
ability last day level (NYMEX Rule 9.27A) for the Natural Gas Daily Option Contract as 1,000
contracts, and that the contract no longer aggregates into the Henry Hub Financial Last Day
Futures Contract (HH), but aggregates into itself (KD). These changes will be effective February
16, 2007. Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule
40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the attached rule amendments comply with the Act,
including regulations under the Act.

If you have any questions, please contact Anthony V. Densieski, Senior Director, Market
Surveillance, at (212) 299-2881, or Nancy M. Minett, Vice President, Compliance, at (212)
299-2940.

Sincerely,

Thomas F. LaSala
Chief Regulatory Officer

ce: Nancy Minett
Anthony V. Densieski
Brian Regan


‘AivAny
Contract Com. ‘One AlvAnyOne | Expir- Expiration xpiration | Report:
Name Rule modity Month Month ation ing
‘Chap: ‘Account: | Account: Account: Account: ‘Agare:
‘tex | Code | “ability” |“ abiity | month | ability Level | abilitytevel | Levet_| “gate
Penultimate | Last Day
Level__| ___Level Limit nto (1)
Contracts Contracts Rule
Rule 9.26 We 9.26A | Rule 9. 9:34
le 927A | Rule 927A
Natural
Gas
Natural
Gas Daily HH
Option 832 KD NA. 3,000 1,000 NA_| KD
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 

### 135065 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

### Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135065 COA: 267942 Ottawa CC: 05-029363-FC CURTIS SCOTT SMITH, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 21, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1790 

To require any amounts remaining in Members’ Representational Allowances 

at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury and used 

for deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. SCHWEIKERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To require any amounts remaining in Members’ Representational Allowances at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction or 

to reduce the Federal debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Giveback Deficit Re5 duction Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1790 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEMBERS’ 

2 REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCES TO BE 

3 USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO RE4 DUCE THE FEDERAL DEBT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, any amounts appropriated for Members’ Rep7 resentational Allowances for the House of Representatives 

8 for a fiscal year which remain after all payments are made 

9 under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited in 

10 the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, except that 

11 in the case of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal 

12 budget deficit, such amounts shall be used to reduce the 

13 Federal debt (in such manner as the Secretary of the 

14 Treasury considers appropriate). 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with 

16 respect to fiscal year 2019 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

17 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

18 The Committee on House Administration of the 

19 House of Representatives shall have authority to prescribe 

20 regulations to carry out this Act. 

21 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

22 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘Member of the House 

23 of Representatives’’ means a Representative in, or a Dele24 gate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00568

- CR

Alejandro Soto Villarreal v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 1394

- 19

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
December 12 , 2019
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely
for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Hague
Corp., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the company’s financial condition and results of operations.





November
14, 2008








/s/ Stephen
Squires


Stephen
Squires, Chief Executive Officer