alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 24 of 24
#### Gabriela MANCIO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-72846.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 22, 2013.

Gabriela Mancio, Anaheim, CA, pro se.

Sung Uk Park, Esquire, Los Angeles, CA, Walter Bocchini, Esquire, Trial, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gabriela Mancio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due process *546violations. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Mancio’s motion to reopen to the extent it concerns the same basic hardship grounds as her original application for cancellation of removal. *See Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) bars this court from reviewing the denial of a motion to reopen where “the only question presented is whether [the] new evidence altered the prior, underlying discretionary determination that [the petitioner] had not met the hardship standard.” (internal quotations and brackets omitted)).

To the extent Mancio presented noncumulative evidence of hardship to her mother and youngest son, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion where the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate any likely impact on the hardship determination in Mancio’s case. *See id.*at 600 n. 6 (prima facie eligibility for relief is demonstrated where “the evidence reveals a reasonable likelihood that the statutory requirements for relief have been satisfied” (internal quotations omitted)).

Mancio’s related due process contention fails because she cannot establish prejudice as a result of the denial of her motion to reopen. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
## Breadcrumb

-  Alaska Science Center Newsletter 

# Alaska Science Center Newsletter - Spring 2023

In this issue, we feature interviews with our scientists, an infographic about past great Alaska earthquakes and tsunamis, Anchorage bike to work day in the Alaska Q&A Series, USGS Arctic research, *Elodea* and juvenile salmon, rusting rivers in the arctic, and video talks by scientists participating in the Strait Science lecture series.

**Subscribe**Subscribe

May 10, 2023

####               Interviews with USGS Alaska Science Center Scientists          

###         The Aleutian Cradle of Tsunamis    

####               Q&A: USGS and 2024 the Anchorage Bike to Work Day          

## USGS Arctic Research 

### The USGS and its partners are addressing issues in a rapidly changing Arctic 

Learn More

####               How Elodea Affects Juvenile Salmon Growth          

####               Why are Arctic Rivers Turning Orange?          

####               Strait Science Lecture Series
# fcmdata0304
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ImageMax, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David B. Walls, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company as of March 31, 2003 (the last date of the period covered
         by the Report).


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ImageMax, Inc. and will be retained by ImageMax, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


David B. Walls
-----------------------
David B. Walls
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Acting Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Greer Bancshares Incorporated (the Company), certifies, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:



| | 1. | The annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. Richard Medlock, Jr.J. Richard Medlock, Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)Date: March 31, 2011




93
Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF GRC AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              52
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       87
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           3,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          1,307<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,121
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   866<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      257<F4>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   260<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    183
<INCOME-TAX>                                        71
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       112
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not applicable because GRC has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>This value consists of three components: Recourse Long-term debt of 1,159
million, Nonrecourse Long-term Debt of 66 million, and Capital Lease
Obligations of 82 million.  Short-term Debt is not included in this
calculation.
<F3>Revenues exclude share of affiliates' earnings.
<F4>This value represents Operating Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
<F5>This value consists of two components: the Provision for Depreciation and
Amortization of 143 million and operating lease expense of 117 million on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

[Program Announcement No. ACYF/HS 2001-07A]


Fiscal Year 2000 Discretionary Announcement for Head Start Family 
Worker Training and Credentialing Initiative; Availability of Funds and 
Request for Applications

AGENCY: Administration for Children, Youth, and Families, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Notice; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the Notice that was 
published in the Federal Register on Thursday, May 3, 2001, Part II. On 
page 22294, first column (Item D), the August 1, 2001 closing date for 
the submission of applications is incorrect. The correct closing time 
and date for receipt of applications is 5 p.m. EDT on July 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The ACYF Operation Center at 1-800-
351-2293 for referral to the appropriate contact person in ACYF for 
programmatic questions or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e18992a18882868f8495cf828e8c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cba3b88ba2a8aca5aebfe5a8a4a6">[email protected]</span></a>

    Dated: May 10, 2001.
James A. Harrell,
Acting Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.
[FR Doc. 01-12283 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## Breadcrumb

-  Earthquake Science Center 

#           Pasadena Field Office      

      By Earthquake Science Center

-  Home 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 

The Pasadena Field Office conducts research and promotes activities to reduce earthquake hazards in southern California. The Office works with Caltech and the California Geological Survey (CGS) to operate the Southern California Seismic Network, and also operates GPS stations to monitor earthquake activity and crustal movements, and to provide information for earthquake response.
#### Susanna E. McKinstry et al., Appellants, v Werner Machine Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Dutchess Dyeing & Printing, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs and the defendant third-party plaintiff separately appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), entered October 1, 1986, as, upon the third-party defendant’s motion, directed them to comply with items Nos. 1 through 5, and items Nos. 7 and 8 of a notice for discovery and inspection served by the third-party defendant.

*362Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the provision thereof which directed the plaintiffs and the defendant third-party plaintiff to comply with items Nos. 1 through 5, and item No. 7 of the subject notice for discovery and inspection, and substituting therefor a provision denying those branches of the third-party defendant’s motion, and (2) adding a provision thereto that, in connection with item No. 8, the plaintiffs and the defendant third-party plaintiff shall be required to produce only so much of their experts’ reports as contain factual data relating to the machine; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the time for the plaintiff and the defendant third-party plaintiff to comply with the notice for discovery and inspection, as so limited, is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

The plaintiffs commenced this action prior to July 1, 1985. Accordingly, the amended provisions of CPLR 3101 (d) in effect at the time of this appeal do not govern the disclosure obligations of either the plaintiff or the defendant third-party plaintiff *(see,*L 1985, ch 294, § 25; *see also, Rogowski v Day Co.,*130 Misc 2d 801). However, the third-party defendant has demonstrated the existence of circumstances sufficient under the former provisions of CPLR 3101 (d), to warrant limited disclosure of the experts’ reports prepared for the plaintiff and the defendant third-party plaintiff *(see, Stevens v Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth.,*117 AD2d 733; *Anastasia v Barnes,*109 AD2d 769; *Terwilliger v Leach Co.,*88 AD2d 910, 911). The order under review is modified accordingly. Mangano, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
v-i

UNITED STATES.DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------- x

MARCO BORGRA, et al., 0 i.50 TG

Plaintiffs,

-against - N

THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA,JU 028

Defendant. . G y

------------------------------------------------- x

Notice is hereby given that the Republic of Argentina (the "Republic"), defendant in

the above named case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

from the April 22, 2008 ex parte temporary restraining order (the "Order"), extended on the record at

the April 30, 2008 hearing before the district court, and further extended by consent by the Republic

until May 23, 2008, on which date the Order converted by law into an appealable preliminary

injunction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65.

Dated: New York, New York

June 6, 2008

CLEARY Go STEEN & HAMILTON LLP

B: Jonathan I. Blackman Wa1~ckman~cgsh.com)

Carmine D. Boccuzzi (cboccuzzi~cgsh.com)

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

(212) 225-2000

Attorneys for the Republic of Argentina

Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 15 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF FORM 10-Q REPORT OF





KL
ENERGY CORPORATION





FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009








The
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of KL Energy
Corporation (“KL”), that to his knowledge:





1.
            This
      Form 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      KL.





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the 10-Q Report. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to KL and will be retained by KL and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
Certification is executed as of November 16, 2009.








/s/ THOMAS J.
BOLAN


Thomas J.
Bolan


Chief
Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Annunziata and Overton Argued by Teleconference

DEBORAH ARTIS MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 2131-96-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON APRIL 29, 1997 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH Edward W. Hanson, Jr., Judge Wm. Brandon Baade for appellant. Thomas D. Bagwell, Senior Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Deborah Artis was convicted by a jury of grand larceny. She appeals, contending that she was denied her right of allocution. For the reasons that follow, we affirm her

conviction. The parties are fully conversant with the record in the cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. Although the trial transcript confirms that the trial judge never explicitly asked Artis whether she had anything she wished to say before he pronounced judgment, it also reveals that Artis did have an opportunity to speak if she desired. See Stamper v.

Commonwealth , 220 Va. 260, 280, 257 S.E.2d 808, 822 (1979).

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 Artis, however, did not request to speak, nor did her counsel object to the judge’s pronouncement without allocution. Furthermore, the sentencing order recites the fact that the judge granted Artis her right to allocution. Artis did not object to the order within twenty-one days. "Where a defendant does not object to the accuracy of an order within 21 days after its entry, an appellate court may ‘presume that the order, as the final pronouncement on the subject, rather than a transcript that may be flawed by omissions, accurately reflects what transpired.’" Kern v. Commonwealth , 2 Va. App. 84, 88, 341 S.E.2d 397, 400 (1986) (quoting Stamper , 220 Va. at 280-81, 257 S.E.2d at 822). Accordingly, we affirm the conviction.

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 24 of 24
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 16, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. Pintsopoulos
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              July
                29, 2008
#### People v Stephan Pierce, Defendant.

Motion to extend time to take appeal denied with leave to renew in 30 days upon submission of specific facts required by CPL 460.30 (2) showing alleged improper conduct of counsel. Memorandum: The mimeographed form used by defendant contains only conclusory allegations. Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05715-CLB Document 4 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05715-CLB Document 4 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05715-CLB Document 4 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 3 of 3