alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1697 

To exempt motor carriers that own or operate 10 or fewer commercial vehicles 

from the electronic logging device mandates, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2019 

Mr. PETERSON (for himself and Mr. GIANFORTE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To exempt motor carriers that own or operate 10 or fewer 

commercial vehicles from the electronic logging device 

mandates, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Carrier Elec5 tronic Logging Device Exemption Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1697 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO THE ELECTRONIC LOGGING DEVICE 

2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MOTOR CARRIERS 

3 THAT OWN OR OPERATE 10 OR FEWER COM4 MERCIAL VEHICLES. 

5 Section 31137(b)(3) of title 49, United States Code, 

6 is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An excepted motor 

9 carrier may comply with the hours of service re10 quirements by requiring each driver to use— 

11 ‘‘(i) a paper record of duty status 

12 form; or 

13 ‘‘(ii) an electronic logging device. 

14 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTED MOTOR CARRIER DE15 FINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘excepted 

16 motor carrier’ means— 

17 ‘‘(i) a motor carrier when transporting 

18 a motor home or recreation vehicle trailer 

19 within the definition of the term 

20 ‘driveaway-towaway operation’ (as defined 

21 in section 390.5 of title 49, Code of Fed22 eral Regulations); and 

23 ‘‘(ii) a motor carrier that owns or op24 erates 10 or fewer commercial motor vehi25 cles, including commercial motor vehicles 

26 owned or operated by all motor carriers afVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:12 Mar 27, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1697.IH H1697

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1697 IH

1 filiated with that motor carrier by common 

2 ownership, common management, common 

3 control, or common familiar relationship.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT TO PRESCRIBE REGULATIONS. 

5 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall promul7 gate such regulations as are necessary to carry out the 

8 amendment made by section 2 of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AZEWEN-JIK KANTE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

NIKE, INC.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-35067

D.C. No. 3:07-cv-01407-HU

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: HUG, SKOPIL and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Azewen-Jik Kante appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Nike, Inc. on statute of limitation grounds. We review a

district court’s grant of summary judgment on statute of limitation grounds de

FILED

FEB 10 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 Nike contends that the correct limitation period is three years under the 1

Oregon Trade Secrets Act. As Kante would fail to meet even the more favorable

six-year limitation period, the court does not need to decide which period applies.

2

novo. Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke, 568 F.3d 757, 764 (9th Cir. 2009). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

The facts of this case are known to the parties. We do not repeat them.

The most favorable limitations period for each of these claims is six years.1

See Everman v. Lockwood, 925 P.2d 128, 129–30 (Ct. App. Or. 1996)

(conversion); Jaqua v. Nike, Inc., 865 P.2d 442, 446 (Ct. App. Or. 1993) (implied

in law contracts). Construing the facts in the light most favorable to Kante, she

became aware of Nike’s alleged breach and conversion by July 2001 at the latest. 

She filed suit in September 2007.

Kante also does not make a valid fraudulent concealment claim that would

allow tolling of the limitation period. See Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co., 503

P.2d 1239, 1241 (Or. 1972) (requiring wrongful concealment of material facts

actually preventing plaintiff’s discovery of the wrong committed).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2004197EN.01001001.xml

| 4.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/10

---

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

(2004/C 197/03)

On 16 and 30 October 2001 respectively, the Commission appointed Ms Karen WILLIAMS and Mr Serge DURANDE to the post of hearing officer, in accordance to Article 1 of the Commission Decision of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of hearing officers in certain competition cases (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21).

---
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




Marcus & Millichap

AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT




This document is an Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) between NNN VF
Southwood Tower, LP (“Seller”) and Rancho Pacific and/or related assignee (“Buyer”) executed by
Buyer on the 9th day of September, 2005 for that certain real property located at 19221
Interstate 45, Shenandoah, TX.



The following terms and conditions supersede and replace any inconsistent provisions in the
referenced Purchase Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the said Purchase Agreement
(including all terms and conditions related to Agent’s commission) shall remain in full force and
effect.




	 	1.	 	The escrow closing date is hereby amended to Monday, December 16,
2005. By execution of this amendment, buyer hereby directs escrow to release
buyer’s earnest money deposit of $300,000 directly to seller as a non-refundable
deposit.





All other terms and conditions remain the same.



ACCEPTANCE




The undersigned Buyer, Seller and Agent accept and agree to the foregoing.



BUYER: /s/ William D. Angel DATE: 12/6/05




	 	•	 	—






Rancho Pacific Development



SELLER: /s/ Anthony W. Thompson DATE: 12/6/05




	 	•	 	—






NNN VF Southwood Tower



AGENT: MARCUS & MILLICHAP REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT BROKERAGE COMPANY



BY: /s/ Alex Garcia DATE: 12/6/05


—



Alex Garcia



NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE BY AGENT AS TO THE LEGAL EFFECT OR VALIDITY OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS
AMENDMENT. A REAL ESTATE BROKER IS QUALIFIED TO GIVE ADVICE ON REAL ESTATE MATTERS. IF YOU DESIRE
LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR ADVICE, CONSULT YOUR ATTORNEY, ACCOUNTANT OR TAX ADVISOR.



Prohamend 12-6-05 1 of 1 Buyer’s Initials     Seller’s Initials     



CA-Copyright Marcus and Millichap 2005
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00219-CV

EL DURANGUENSE FORT WORTH INC.

D/B/A EL DURANGUENSE, Appellant

V.

TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE 

COMMISSION, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 352nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (352-307859-19)

March 26, 2020

Opinion by Justice Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that El Duranguense Fort Worth Inc. shall pay all of the 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1363-000]


Coral Energy Management, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 7, 2001.
    Coral Energy Management, LLC (Coral) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Coral will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy transactions at market-based rates. Coral also requested waiver 
of various Commission regulations. In particular, Coral requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Coral.
    On April 17, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Coral should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Coral is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant,and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Coral's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 17, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11885 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Clear All

        12 December 2023    

                    Sailors enhance medical expeditionary training with new program                  
                Each month, Sailors at Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command (NMRTC) Charleston attend Fleet Readiness and Operational Sustainment Training (FROST), which provides a basic understanding and skill set related to operational and expeditionary medical platforms.             

        16 October 2023    

                    U.S. Navy deploys newest medical expeditionary capability aboard Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group                 
                The U.S. Navy deployed the first En-Route Care System (ERCS) medical expeditionary capability aboard the Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (IKECSG) during a regularly scheduled deployment, Oct. 14.            

        19 May 2023    

                    Navy Expeditionary Medical Unit Rotations Provide Ongoing Support in the Middle East                 
                Expeditionary Medical Facility Juliet (EMF-J) welcomed home Navy Expeditionary Medical Unit 10- Gulf (NEMU 10G), Rotation 13, after a 7-month deployment to the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, May 4.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6819

DWAYNE DION BACON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MR. THORNE; MR. COULBURNE; KATHLEEN GREEN; 

MR. KING; TRACEY WARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(8:06-cv-02454-AW)

Submitted: September 28, 2007 Decided: October 11, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Dion Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Dion Bacon appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bacon v.

Thorne, No. 8:06-cv-02454-AW (D. Md. May 14, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# CE2011161EN.01015801.xml

| 31.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 161/158 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 161/158

---

Tuesday 18 May 2010Establishment of a European Asylum Support Office ***II

P7_TA(2010)0158

European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 May 2010 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Asylum Support Office (16626/2/2009 – C7-0049/2010 – 2009/0027(COD))

2011/C 161 E/24

(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council position at first reading (16626/2/2009 – C7-0049/2010),

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2009)0066),

having regard to Article 251(2), Article 63, first paragraph, points (1) and (2), and Article 66 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0071/2009),

having regard to its position at first reading (1),

1

having regard to the Commission Communication to Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures’ (COM(2009)0665),

having regard to Article 294(7), Article 74 and Article 78(1) and (2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to Rule 72 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0118/2010),

| 1. | Approves the Council's position; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Council's position;

| 2. | Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the position; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the position;

| 3. | Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| 4. | Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;

Official Journal of the European Union

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, 7.5.2009, P6_TA(2009)0379.

1

---
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
# C_2010354EN.01007101.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/71

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement Area’

COM(2009) 477 final — 2009/0129 (CNS) (1)

1

2010/C 354/16

The Council and the European Parliament decided on 19 January 2010 and 5 March 2010, respectively, to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex Article 37 of the Treaty establishing the European Community), on the

‘Proposal for a Council Regulation on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement Area’

Proposal for a Council Regulation on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement Area

COM(2009) 477 final — 2009/0129 (CNS) (1).

1

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 461st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 March 2010 (meeting of 17 March 2010), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

st

Brussels, 17 March 2010.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---

(1)  The acronym should read COD.

1

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 9 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
DUDLEY EDWARDS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. NEW MEXICO STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT; ROBERT G. BURD, Supervisor III; GENE LEYBA, Supervisor II,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-2349 (D.C. No. CIV-96-789-JC) (D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , BARRETT , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of-2-

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Dudley R. Edwards, Jr., appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of his complaintalleging claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “We review the district court’s grant of summary ju dgment de novo, applying the same standard used by the district cou rt under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).” Novell, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co. , 141 F.3d 983, 985 (10th Cir. 1998). After a thorough review of the record, we affirm for subs tantially the reasons stated by the district court in its order dated October 3, 19 97, granting summary judgment. The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the District of New Mexico is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

I, Alan D. Feldman, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan D. Feldman                            
|Alan D. Feldman                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: May 8, 2008                              

I, William M. Guzik, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ William M. Guzik                                
|William M. Guzik                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: May 8, 2008