UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q





[X]      QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012





[   ]     TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT





Commission file number: 0-52953





QUANTUM MATERIALS


CORP.


(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)





Nevada
20-8195578
20-8195578(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)





12326 Scott Drive


Kingston, OK 73439


(Address of principal executive offices)





214-701-8779


(Registrant's telephone number)





Check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [   ]





Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the 12 preceding months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such file). Yes [ X ]      No [    ]





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes [  ] No [X ].





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ‘‘accelerated filer and large accelerated filer’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):





Large Accelerated Filer [ ]
Accelerated Filer         [ ]Accelerated Filer       [ ]
Smaller Reporting Company [X]





As of October 31, 2012, the issuer had 124,574,513 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share outstanding ("Common Stock").





1
 Table Of Contents




FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1. Financial Statements








INDEX








PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PageItem 1.  Financial Statements
3Consolidated balance sheets as of  September 30, 2012 (unaudited) and June 30, 2012
3Consolidated statements of operations, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from inception (May 19, 2008) through September 30, 2012 (unaudited)
4Consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from inception (May 19, 2008) through September 30, 2012 (unaudited)
5Notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
6Item 2.  Management’s Plan of Operation.
11Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures and Market Risk
18Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
19PART 2 – OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.  Legal Proceedings
20Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
20Item 3.  Defaults upon Senior Securities
20Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures
20Item 5.  Other Information
20Item 6.  Exhibits
21Signatures
22








2
 Table Of Contents


Quantum Materials Corp.


(A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


September 30


June 302012


2012(Unaudited)ASSETSCurrentCash

$
4,654


$
15,261Total current assets


4,654



15,261Licenses


55,000



55,000Furniture and equipment, net of deprecation


751



1,160Deferred financing cost, net of amortization of $315,000 and $278,833


-



-Total other assets


55,751



56,160Total assets

$
60,405


$
71,421LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCurrent liabilitiesAccounts payable and accrued Liabilities

$
166,075


$
151,573Accrued liabilities - related party


1,327,574



1,018,945Accrued expenses


72,500



72,500Deferred revenue


899



899Fair value of derivative liabilities


179,000



346,000Convertible debenture, net of discount


1,500,000



1,500,000Total current liabilities


3,246,048



3,089,917Total liabilities


3,246,048



3,089,917Stockholders' deficitCommon stock, $0.001 par value,200,000,000 shares authorized,Issued and outstanding 125,144,366 and 124,113,887, respectively


125,145



124,114Additional paid-in capital


8,580,345



8,324,417Deficit accumulated during the development stage


(11,891,133
)


(11,467,027
)Total stockholders' deficit


(3,185,643
)


(3,018,496
)Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit

$
60,405


$
71,421The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.







3
 Table Of Contents


Quantum Materials Corp.


(A Development Stage Company)


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 For the three months ending September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011
 and period from May 19, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2012
 (unaudited)


InceptionThree months ended


throughSeptember 30,


September 30,2012


2011


2012Operating expenses:General and administrative

$
549,190


$
219,120


$
9,139,190Research and development


4,000



7,272



787,542Total operating expenses


553,190



226,392



9,926,732Loss from operations


(553,190
)


(226,392
)


(9,926,732
)Other expenses (income):Amortization of convertible debenture discount


-



257,144



1,468,837Amortization of deferred finance cost


-



26,250



315,000Change in fair value of derivative liabilities


(167,000
)


(522,000
)


(316,912
)Gain on accounts payable writedowns


-



-



(652,505
)Interest expense


37,916



35,244



651,994Warrant expense


-



3,513



497,987Total other expenses / (income)


129,084



199,849



(1,964,401
)Net loss

$
(424,106
)

$
(26,543
)

$
(11,891,133
)Basic and diluted loss per common share

$
(0.00
)

$
(0.00
)Weighted average number of commonshares outstanding


123,545,062



111,713,307The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.






4
 Table Of Contents


Quantum Materials Corp.


(A Development Stage Company)


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 For the three months ending September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011
 and period from May 19, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2012


Three months

Three months

Inceptionended


ended


throughSeptember 30

September 30

September 302012


2011


2012CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESNet loss

$
(424,106
)

$
(26,543
)

$
(11,891,133
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cashused in operating activities:Stock issued for services


-



-



5,383,372Options issued for services


181,542



-



181,542Stock issued for debenture interest


37,917



35,242



641,995Depreciation of furniture and office equipment


409



545



14,788Amortization of convertible debenture discount


-



257,144



1,468,837Amortization of deferred finance cost


-



26,250



315,000Warrant expense


-



3,513



518,251Change in fair value of warrants and embeddedconversion feature


(167,000
)


(522,000
)


(316,912
)Net change in:Deferred revenue


-



-



899Accounts payable and accrued liabilities


14,500



(20,500
)


472,605Accrued liabilities - related party


308,630


86,252


1,032,150Cash flows used by operating activities


(48,108
)


(160,097
)


(2,178,606
)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIESPurchase of license


-



-



(55,000
)Proceeds from disposal of furniture and equipment


-



5,343Purchase of furniture & equipment


-


-


(20,883
)Cash flows provided by investing activities


-


-


(70,540
)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESProceeds from issuance of common stock


37,500



160,000



1,068,800Proceeds from related party advances


-



-



-Proceeds from convertible debenture issued


-



-



1,500,000Payment of deferred finance cost


-


-


(315,000
)Cash flows provided by financing activities


37,500


160,000


2,253,800NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH


(10,608
)


(97
)


4,654Cash, beginning of the period


15,262


98


-Cash, end of the period

$
4,654

$
1

$
4,654Supplemental disclosure with respect to cash flows:Cash paid for income taxes

$
-


$
-


$
-Cash paid for interest

$
-


$
-


$
-Non cash transactionsIssuance of common stock in connectionwith recapitalization

$
-


$
-


$
-Cumulative effect of change in accountingprinciple on convertible notes

$
-


$
-


$
-Accounts payable write down

$
-


$
-


$
652,505The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.






5
 Table Of Contents





QUANTUM MATERIAL CORP.


(A Development Stage Company)


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


September 30, 2012


(Unaudited)





Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies





Basis of Presentation





The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements. Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012. The results for the three months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending June 30, 2013.





Since November 4, 2008, the Company has changed its business plans and is no longer intending to pursue the mining of mineral rights located in Nevada. The Company intends to pursue the business plans of its subsidiary, Solterra.  The following is a brief business overview of Solterra.





Solterrais a start-up solar technology and quantum dot manufacturing firm which was founded by Stephen Squires. Mr. Squires perceives an opportunity to acquire a significant amount of both quantum dot and solar photovoltaic market share by commercializing a low cost quantum dot processing technology and a low cost quantum dot based third generation photovoltaic technology/solar cell, pursuant to an exclusive license agreement with William Marsh Rice University (“Rice University” or “Rice”).  Our objective is to become the first bulk manufacture of high quality tetrapod quantum dots and the first solar cell manufacturer to be able to offer a solar electricity solution that competes on a non-subsidized basis with the price of retail electricity in key markets in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.





Going Concern





The Company recorded losses from continuing operations in the current period presented. Current liabilities exceed current assets, resulting in a negative net worth and accumulated deficits during the development stage. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to reverse negative operating trends, raise additional capital, and obtain debt financing.





Management has revised its business strategy to include expansion into other lines of business. In conjunction with the anticipated new revenue streams, management is currently negotiating new debt and equity financing, the proceeds from which would be used to settle outstanding debts at more favorable terms, to finance operations, and to develop its business plans. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise capital, obtain debt financing, or improve operating results sufficiently to continue as a going concern.





The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.




6
 Table Of Contents





Note 2. Derivatives and Fair Value





The Company has evaluated the application of ASC 815 to the Convertible Note issued November 4, 2008.  Based on the guidance in ASC 815, the Company concluded these instruments were required to be accounted for as derivatives as of July 1, 2009 due to the down round protection feature on the conversion price and the exercise price.  The Company records the fair value of these derivatives on its balance sheet at fair value with changes in the values of these derivatives reflected in the statements of operations as “Gain (loss) on derivative liabilities.”  These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 and are disclosed on the balance sheet under Derivative Liabilities.





ASC 825-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 825-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: Level 1  – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; andLevel 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company’s Level 3 liabilities consist of the derivative liabilities associated with the November 4, 2008 note.  At September 30, 2011, all of the Company’s derivative liabilities were categorized as Level 3 fair value assets. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.





Level 3 Valuation Techniques





Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.  Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative liabilities for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.  We have valued the convertible note that contains down round provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of a valuation consultant, for which management understands the methodologies. This model incorporates transaction details such as the Company’s stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of July 1, 2009 and September 30, 2012.   The fair value of the derivatives as of July 1, 2009 upon implementation of ASC 815-40-15 was estimated by management to be $495,912.  As part of implementing ASC 815-40-14 the Company decreased the accumulated deficit by $162,643 and decreased additional paid in capital by $212,184 and increased the discount on the convertible debenture by $446,371.  The adjustment to the accumulated deficit was a result of the interest expense recorded in connection with the original derivative liability and the reversal of prior amortization expense, and the change in fair value of the derivative liability as of July 1, 2009.




As of September 30, 2012Fair Value Measuring UsingCarrying Value


Level 1


Level 2


Level 3

TotalDerivatives Liability

$
179,000



-



-



179,000


$
179,000Total Derivatives Liability

$
179,000



-



-



179,000


$
179,000






7
 Table Of Contents






The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the first three months of fiscal year 2012:





Fair ValueMeasurementsUsing Level 3InputsDerivativeLiabilities

TotalsBeginning Balance as of July 1, 2011

$
1,223,000


$
1,223,000Total Gains or Losses (realized/unrealized) Included in Net Loss


(1,044,000
)


(1,044,000
)Purchases, issuances and settelements


-



-Transfers in and/or out of Level 3


-



-Ending Balance at September 30, 2012

$
179,000


$
179,000


Note 3. Related party transactions





The Company expensed management fees to the CEO / major shareholder as well as other related party executives of $351,179 and $843,405 respectively in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and the year ended June 30, 2012.  The Company was not able to pay the some of these fees, as a result the accrued liabilities related party was $1,324,694 and $1,108,945 respectively as of September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2012.





During the three  months ended September 30, 2012 the Company recorded $2,880 of rent expense for the use of executive office space in the home of the CEO / major shareholder, $nil was paid and $2,880 was accrued.





Note 4.  Common stock





In July 2012 the Company issued 343,750 shares of common stock in exchange for cash at a price of $0.08 per share.





In September 2012 the Company issued 125,000 shares of common stock in exchange for cash at a price of $0.08 per share.





In September 2012 the Company issued 561,729 shares of common stock to pay accrued interest of $30,333 for the three month period ended September 1, 2012.





Note 5.  Commitments and Contingencies





Contingency





Certain default clauses related to the various agreements discussed in Item 2 (Management’s Plan of Operation) would result in a change of control of the board of directors.  Certain debt holders would have the option to appoint independent members to the board under such default.




8
 Table Of Contents





License Agreement - Work-Study Arrangements




License Agreement with Rice University




On August 20, 2008, Solterra entered into a License Agreement with Rice University.  In September 2011, Solterra entered into an amended License Agreement and Quantum Materials entered into a new License Agreement with Rice. Rice is the owner of certain inventions and patent applications, know-how and rights pertaining to the synthesis of uniform nanoparticle shapes with high selectivity.  We have obtained the exclusive rights to license and sublicense (subject to Rice’s consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld), develop, manufacture, market and exploit Rice’s inventions, patent applications and any issued patents in the case of Solterra, for the manufacture and sale of photovoltaic cells and photovoltaic applications and in the case of Quantum Materials for the manufacture and sale of quantum dots for electronic and medical applications (excluding photovoltaic applications). With respect to Rice’s patent applications, Rice made a provisional filing for an invention disclosure titled “synthesis of uniform nanoparticle shapes with high selectivity” with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on April 13, 2007 and a subsequent utility filing on April 11, 2008 under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”). PCT enables the U.S. applicant to file one application, "an international application," in a standardized format in English in the U.S. Receiving Office (the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office), and have that application acknowledged as a regular national or regional filing in any State or region that is party to the PCT. Dr. Michael Wong is a director of our company and is the inventor of Rice’s patent application licensed by Solterra.




Our initial agreement with Rice requires the payment of certain patent fees to Rice and for us to acquire additional funding and to meet certain milestones by specific dates.  Rice and the Company recently established new milestones for the Company to achieve in the months and years ahead, the failure of which could lead to the termination of the license agreement.




Rice is entitled to receive during the term of each License Agreement certain royalties under the License Agreement of adjusted gross sales (as defined) ranging from 2% to 4% for photovoltaic cells and 7.5% of adjusted gross sales for quantum dots sold in electronic and medical applications. Minimum royalties payable under the License Agreement include $129,412 due August 1, 2012, $473,250 due August 1, 2013, $1,746,000 due August 1, 2014 and $3,738,600 due August 1, 2015 and each August 1 of every year thereafter, subject to adjustments for changes in the consumer pricing index.We are currently in discussions with Rice to modify these milestones to better coincide with the availability of capital necessary to accomplish the scale up in the most efficient manner possible.In the event of a Liquidity Event (as defined), Rice is entitled to receive from Licensee a fee of $750,000 within five business days of the Liquidity Event. The term of the License Agreement is to expire on the expiration date of Rice’s rights in its intellectual property and the Licensee’s rights are worldwide. Our Agreement, as amended, with Rice provides for termination of each Agreement in the event that we are determined to be insolvent as defined in the Agreements. The milestones of each License Agreement also require a quantum dot production pilot plant to be established by February 28, 2012, capable of producing 1,000 grams per week and a full scale quantum dot production plant be established by May 31, 2012.  The Company was unable to meet the August 2012 minimum royalty and the aforesaid milestones and is in discussions with Rice regarding the License Agreement.




Agreement with Arizona State University




Solterra had an agreement with Arizona State University (“ASU”) pursuant to which ASU at a cost of $835,000 will assist Solterra under the direction of Dr. Ghassan Jabbour in scaling up or optimizing the solar cells so that they can be printed. As of June 30, 2010, $630,000 of these costs in this agreement have been incurred and a further $205,000 were to accrue before the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.  During February 2010, Dr. Jabbour accepted a Directorship at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), in Saudi Arabia, as a result of Dr. Jabbour now being located in Saudi Arabia it is no longer logistically feasible for him to conduct the development work at ASU. We have paid ASU $175,000 under our contract with ASU. Dr. Jabbour is continuing his development work at the KAUST facilities and we have attempted to negotiate a substantially reduced fee payable to ASU.  Dr. Jabbour is also our Chief Science Officer and is an employee of QMC/Solterra.
 
 Agreement with University of Arizona
 
 Solterra has entered into an exclusive Patent License Agreement with the University of Arizona ("UA") to license US Patent # 7,015,052, which was issued on March 21, 2006, entitled “Screen Printing Techniques for the Fabrication of Organic Light - Emitting Diodes”. Pursuant to the License Agreement, Solterra has an exclusive license to market, sell and distribute licensed products within its field of use which is defined as organic light emitting diodes in printed electronic displays and all other printed electronic components. Solterra has the right to grant sublicenses with respect to the licensed product and the license method (as defined in the agreement). Pursuant to said agreement, as amended, we are obligated to pay minimum annual royalties of $5,000 by June 30, 2012, $25,000 by December 31, 2013, $50,000 by December 31, 2014, $125,000 by June 30, 2015 and $200,000 on each June 30th thereafter, subject to adjustments for increases in the Consumer Price Index.  Royalties based on net sales are 2% of net sales of licensed products for non-display electronic component applications and 2.5% of net sales of licensed products for printed electronic displays. Our Agreement with UA may be terminated by UA in the event that we are in breach of any provision of this Agreement and said breach continues for 60 days after receiving written notice. Our Agreement with UA will also automatically terminate if Solterra becomes insolvent or unable to pay its debts as they become due. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to meet our obligations under our Agreement with UA. Termination of our Agreement with UA could materially adversely affect our operations.
  9
 Table Of Contents


Employment agreements





As of September 30, 2012, we have seven full-time staff (including Stephen Squires) and one part-time employee namely, Dr. Ghassan E. Jabbour.  We anticipate that we will hire additional key staff upon receipt of financing in areas of Chief Operating Officer, research and development, administration/accounting, operations and sales/marketing.




Note 6. Warrants





No warrants were issued in the three month period ending September 30, 2012.





Note 7. Subsequent events





Stockholder Matters





On October 12, 2012 the Company executed an agreement with the debenture holders to extend the maturity date of the convertible debenture to November 4, 2013.  All other terms in the original agreement remain unchanged.  In addition, the debenture holders were granted 2,000,000 three-year common stock warrants with a strike price of $0.08.





In October 2012, the Company entered into new employment agreements with the Company’s Chief Executive Office, Chief Technology Officer and Vice President of Research and Development. Each of the new employment agreements become effective on January 1, 2013 and have a term of five years. In the case of Mr. Squires, he will receive an annual salary of $225,000 and a signing bonus of 5,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock on or before January 15, 2013. Mr. Squires will also be granted an option to purchase an additional 5,000,000 shares exercisable at $.03 per share and the options being fully vested and exercisable through January 20, 2025.  In the event of termination of his services as a director, he is entitled to receive payment of $225,000 in one lump sum no later than 30 days after termination of his services as a director. Mr. Squires would also be eligible to receive a one year extension of the expiration date of his option. Messrs. Glass, Chief Technology Officer, and Doderer, Vice President of Research, have employment agreements with terms similar to those of Mr. Squires, except as follows: (i) Messrs. Glass and Doderer each receive an annual salary of $150,000 and potential termination pay from their services as a director, also in the amount of $150,000; and (ii) Messrs. Glass and Doderer will receive signing bonuses on or before January 15, 2013 of 3,000,000 shares and 5,000,000 shares, respectively, and 3,000,000 warrants and 5,000,000 warrants, respectively.
 
 Other Material Contracts
 
 On October 26, 2012, the Board of Directors approved a September 27, 2012 agreement with Bespoke Growth Partners to assist the Company in general and financial public relations. Bespoke received 3,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock and warrants to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock containing cashless exercise provisions over a term of three years. The exercise price of these warrants was established on October 26, 2012 at $.05 per share. On the same date, the Board of Directors also approved an investment relation contract with Sheridan Global Advisors pursuant to which 2,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock were issued in consideration thereof.
 
 Warrant Exchange for Accrued Salary
 
 On October 26, 2012, the Board of Directors approved a plan to offer officers, employees and consultants the opportunity to exchange their accrued wages and consulting fees into either five year warrants and/or restricted shares of Common Stock. Any person desiring to exchange cash owed to them for warrants would receive a 25% bonus on the amount exchanged and would receive warrants exercisable at $.05 per share over a period of five years. Any person agreeing to receive restricted Common Stock in lieu of cash would receive a 35% bonus and would receive restricted shares based at $.05 per share, which price approximates the current 10 day average trading price. The foregoing plan was based upon wages and/or fees owed as of June 30, 2012. As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, no officers, employee or consultants have accepted this offer.
 
 Charter Amendment
 
 On October 26, 2012, the Board of Directors approved a resolution to increase the number of shares of Common Stock from 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock to 300,000,000 shares, subject to stockholder approval.


10
 Table Of Contents





Item 2. Management’s Plan of Operation





This Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements" relating to us which represent our current expectations or beliefs, including statements concerning our operations, performance, financial condition and growth.  For this purpose, any statement contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as "may", "anticipation", "intend", "could", "estimate", or "continue" or the negative or other comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements.





Statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as that term is defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, the forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those projected. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by the Company are not guarantees of future performance and those actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.  Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: well-established competitors who have substantially greater financial resources and longer operating histories, regulatory delays or denials, ability to compete as a start-up company in a highly competitive market, and access to sources of capital.





The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our Form 10-K filed October 11, 2012 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.  Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of the Company's plans, objectives, expectations and intentions.  The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-Q should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear herein.  The Company's actual results could differ materially from those discussed here.





The financial information furnished herein has not been audited by an independent accountant; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (only consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2012 have been included.






11
 Table Of Contents





Business Overview





Quantum Material Corp.is a start-up solar technology and quantum dot manufacturing firm.  We perceive an opportunity to acquire a significant amount of both quantum dot and solar photovoltaic market share by commercializing a low cost quantum dot processing technology and a low cost quantum dot based third generation photovoltaic technology/solar cell, pursuant to an exclusive license agreement with William Marsh Rice University (“Rice University” or “Rice”).  Our objective is for Quantum to become the first bulk manufacturer of high quality tetrapod quantum dots and for Solterra to be the first solar cell manufacturer to be able to offer a solar electricity solution that competes on a non-subsidized basis with the price of retail electricity in key markets in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.





Competitors are pursuing different nanotechnological approaches to developing solar cells, but the general idea is the same for all. When light hits an atom in a semiconductor, those photons of light with lots of energy can push an electron out of its nice stable orbital around the atom. The electron is then free to move from atom to atom, like the electrons in a piece of metal when it conducts electricity.  Using nano-size bits of semiconductor embedded in a conductive plastic maximizes the chance that an electron can escape the nanoparticle and reach the conductive plastic before it is "trapped" by another atom that has also been stripped of an electron. Once in the plastic, the electron can travel through wires connecting the solar cell to an electronic device. It can then wander back to the nanocrystal to join an atom that has a positive charge, which scientifically is called “electron-hole recombination”.




A quantum dot solar cell typically uses a thin layer of quantum dot semiconductor material, rather than silicon chips, to convert sunlight into electricity. Quantum Dots, also known as nanocrystals, measure near one billionth of an inch and are a non-traditional type of semiconductor. Management believes that they can be used as an enabling material across many industries and that quantum dots are unparalleled in versatility and flexible in form.   See “Note 5” regarding License Agreements with Rice University.





Quantum intends to design and manufacture solar cells using a proprietary thin film semiconductor technology that we believe will allow us to reduce our average solar cell manufacturing costs and be extremely competitive in this market. Quantum will be one of the first companies to integrate non-silicon quantum dot thin film technology into high volume low cost production using proprietary technologies.  Our objective is to become one of the first solar module manufacturers to offer a solar electricity solution that competes on a non-subsidized basis with the price of retail electricity in key markets in North America, Europe and Asia. Management believes that the manufacture of our thin film quantum dot solar cells can introduce a cost effective disruptive technology that can help accelerate the conversion from a fossil fuel dependent energy infrastructure to one based on renewable, carbon-neutral energy sources. We believe that our proposed products also can be a part of the solution to greenhouse gases and global warming.




12
 Table Of Contents





Plan of Reorganization, Recent Financing and Change in Control





On November 4, 2008, the Company closed on an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization by and among the Company, Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc. (“Solterra”), the shareholders of Solterra and Gregory Chapman as “Indemnitor” (the “Agreement”), which resulted in Solterra becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Chapman cancelled 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company owned by him and issued a general release in favor of the Company terminating its obligations to repay Mr. Chapman monies owed to him.





In accordance with the Agreement, the Company issued 41,250,000 shares of its Common Stock to the former stockholders of Solterra. Certain existing stockholders of the Company in consideration of Solterra and its shareholders completing the transaction, issued to the Company a Promissory Note in the amount of $3,500,000 due and payable on or before January 15, 2009, through the payment of cash or, with the consent of the Company, the cancellation of up to 12,000,000 issued and outstanding shares of the Company owned by them.  While this note is in default and the Company has made demand for payment and is considering all legal options, our Management does not believe that this Note is collectible.





On November 4, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, Debenture, Security Agreement, Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, Registration Rights Agreement, Escrow Agreement, Stock Pledge Agreement and other related transactional documents (the “Transaction Documents”) to obtain $1,500,000 in gross proceeds from three non-affiliated parties (collectively hereinafter referred to as the “Lenders”) in exchange for 3,525,000 restricted shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Restricted Shares”) and Debentures in the principal amount aggregating $1,500,000.  Each Debenture has a term of three years maturing on November 4, 2011, which was recently extended to November 4, 2013, bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and is prepayable by the Company at anytime without penalty, subject to the Debenture holders’ conversion rights. Each Debenture is convertible at the option of each Lender into the Company’s Common Stock (the “Debenture Shares”, which together with the Restricted Shares shall collectively be referred to as the “Securities”), currently at a conversion price of $.12 per share (the “Conversion Price”).  The Registration Rights Agreement requires the Company to register the resale of the Securities within certain time limits and to be subject to certain penalties in the event the Company fails to timely file the Registration Statement, fails to obtain an effective Registration Statement or, once effective, to maintain an effective Registration Statement until the Securities are saleable pursuant to Rule 144 without volume restriction or other limitations on sale. The Debentures are secured by the assets of the Company and are guaranteed by Solterra as the Company’s subsidiary. In the event the Debentures are converted in their entirety, the Company would be required to issue an aggregate of 12,500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, subject to anti-dilution protection for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, reclassifications and sale of the Company’s Common Stock a price below the Conversion Price.  Certain changes of control or fundamental transactions such as a merger or consolidation with another company could cause an event of default under the Transaction.   We also entered into a Standstill Agreement with the Debenture Holders effective June 1, 2009 which was amended and expired on December 1, 2009.   At the time the Standstill Agreement expired, the Company did not have an effective registration statement, registering the resale of all Registrable Securities as required by the Registration Rights Agreement. Nevertheless, management believes that no such registration statement was then or is currently required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as management believes that all securities of the Company held by the Debenture Holders are saleable pursuant to Rule 144 without volume restriction or other limitations on sale, so long as the Debenture Holders are not affiliated parties of the Company.  As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, the Debenture Holders have taken no action under the Registration Rights Agreement or other transaction documents to notify the Company that it is in default under any of such agreements even though an event of default may be deemed to exist for several reasons; including, without limitation, those enumerated above and the Company's failure to obtain director and officer liability insurance, failure to make a payment of interest on a timely basis and failure to be current from time-to-time with all obligations and responsibilities owed to Rice under our license agreement.





On December 18, 2011 the Company executed an agreement with the debenture holders to extend the maturity date of the convertible debenture to November 4, 2012.  All other terms in the original agreement remain unchanged.  In addition, the debenture holders were granted 2,000,000 three-year common stock warrants with a strike price of $0.08.





On October 12, 2012 the Company executed an agreement with the debenture holders to extend the maturity date of the convertible debenture to November 4, 2013.  All other terms in the original agreement remain unchanged.  In addition, the debenture holders were granted 2,000,000 three-year common stock warrants with a strike price of $0.08.




13
 Table Of Contents





Plan of Operation





Since November 4, 2008, the Company is executing its business plan as follows:





Solterra plans to:





a)
Scale up Quantum Dot Production byapplying proprietary technology licensed from Rice University for our quantum dot synthesis process and accomplishing large scale production using proprietary Micro-Reactor technology jointly developed through an agreement with Access2Flow an advanced flow chemistry consortium based in the Netherlands. These proprietary technologies enable Solterra to produce the highly desirable tetrapod quantum dots at a cost savings of greater than 75% compared to competing suppliers, and will organically supply Solterra’s requirements for quantum dots for its solar cells and other quantum dot enabled products. Additionally, Solterra intends to market these Q-Dots through various existing supply channels into various markets, including but not limited to medical diagnostics and electronics. The initial pilot scale up will take place at the Access2Flow facilities in the Netherlands and once optimized will be relocated to a solar cell production facility, which is anticipated to be located in Saudi Arabia.





b)
Fabricate solar cells and optimize the performance of solar cells based on a proprietary blend of  quantum dots (QDs).  The aim is to invest our best efforts to demonstrate and scale up production of low cost quantum dot solar cells having peak efficiency of greater than 6%. The efficiency of solar cells is the electrical power it puts out as percentage of the power in incident sunlight. Within the photovoltaic market, cell pricing and peak efficiency are key benchmarks for consumers in the decision for system selection and installation. The design and manufacture of Solterra's quantum dot based solar cells is projected to allow for the conversion of sunlight into usable electricity at a combination of efficiencies and cell cost at a very low "cents per kilowatt-hour" rate. This work to date has been accomplished on site at the Arizona State University labs but is being relocated better accommodate the logistic requirements of our Chief Science Officer, Professor Ghassan Jabbour, who is working at Kaust University in Saudi Arabia.




c)
Identify, license and or develop additional quantum dot enabled applications in the lighting, memory and medical fields.
 
 Objectives:





The Current Objectives of Solterra upon receipt of additional financing are as follows:





·
Become the first bulk manufacture of high quality tetrapod quantum dots and the first solar cell manufacturer to be able to offer a solar electricity solution that competes on a non-subsidized basis with the price of retail electricity in key markets in North America, South America, Europe the Middle East and Asia.





·
Build a robust intellectual property portfolio in third generation photovoltaics, quantum dot process technologies and other quantum dot enabled technologies. Success criteria include completion of preparation and filing of various patent applications in the area of Quantum Dot Solar Cell technology, defining and initiating the strategy to secure a reliable source of key materials, and filing or acquiring additional process related patent applications in solar or printed electronics, which intellectual property would be owned or controlled by Solterra.





·
Initiate scaled manufacturing of tetrapod quantum dots, based in part on technology licensed from William H. Marsh Rice University, and building on continued research.  Planning includes the implementation of one or more pilot lines based on outcomes of collaboration with Access2Flow, an advanced flow chemistry consortium based in the Netherlands.  The design of the pilot line is intended such that the initial target output of the line, at approximately one kilogram per day, can be further scaled at least by an order of magnitude to 100 Kilograms per day in 2012.  The output of the tetrapod quantum dots manufacturing will be used for Solterra’s quantum dot solar cells as well as stand-alone sales into the biomedical research fields and to third party developers of quantum dot products such as displays, memory and computer and consumer electronics.





·
Continue to develop and characterize the Quantum Dot Solar Cell product; moving towards pilot proof line for solar cells and leading to high throughput print line ultimately capable of yearly solar cell output near gigawatt range. Target cell efficiencies are 6% within one year, 15% within 2 years and greater than 25% within five years.  Coupled within cell cost per watt decreasing below $.75/Watt, we intend to pursue initial product sales in 2013.





14
 Table Of Contents





Liquidity and Capital Resources





At September 30, 2012 the Company had a working capital deficit of $3,241,394 with total current assets of $4,654 and liabilities of $3,246,048.  Approximately $1,327,574 of these liabilities are owed to our officers, directors and employees for services rendered and expenses not reimbursed through September 30, 2012.  The Company has been in the development stage since inception.  As a result, the Company has relied on financing through the issuance of common stock and a convertible debenture as well as advances from a director shareholder and employees’ wages being partially or fully accrued but not paid.





As of September 30, 2012, the Company lacks cash or cash equivalent assets and continues to incur losses in its development stage operations.  In the past, the Company has been relying on loans from its Chief Executive Officer resulting from private sale transactions in our common stock owned by him.  The Company has also relied on various universities performing work and providing U.S. licensing rights under business agreements in which the Company is in arrears in payments as well as employees and consultants agreeing to defer payment of wages and fees owed to them.   Currently, the Company is seeking additional financing; however, no definitive agreements for additional financing have been received and the Company cannot provide any assurance that additional funding will be available to finance our operations on terms acceptable to us, if at all, in order to support our plan of operations.  If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then our stockholders may lose their entire investment in the Company.  See "Notes to Financial Statements."




Cash was used in operating activities of $48,108 for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  This is a result of a net loss of $424,106 partially offset by non-cash items including stock issued for debenture interest $37,917, as well as change in accounts payables and accrued liabilities of $14,500, change in accrued liabilities related parties $308,630, change in fair value of warrants and embedded conversion feature of $(167,000), and stock options issued for services of $181,542.  Cash flows from financing activities during the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $37,500 which consisted of $37,500 from the proceeds of the sale of common stock. This resulted in a decrease in cash for the period of $10,608 and cash on hand at the end of the period of $4,654.





Cash was used in operating activities of $160,097 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. This is a result of a net loss of $26,541 partially offset by non-cash items including stock issued for debenture interest $35,242, as well as change in accounts payables and accrued liabilities of ($20,500), change in accrued liabilities related parties $86,251, change in fair value of warrants and embedded conversion feature of $(522,000), amortization of convertible debenture discount of $257,144 and amortization of deferred finance cost of $26,250 and non-cash warrant expense of $3,513.  Cash flows from financing activities during the three months ended September 30, 2011 were $160,000 which consisted of $160,000 from the proceeds of the sale of common stock. This resulted in a decrease in cash for the period of $97 and cash on hand at the end of the period of $1.





These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for its next fiscal year.  Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying value and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  At September 30, 2012, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations, has accumulated losses of $2,062,744 since its inception, at September 30, 2012, has a working capital deficit of $3,241,394 and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The Company requires immediate and substantial additional financing during fiscal 2013 to maintain its development stage operations. The Company is exploring all reasonable avenues of financing at this time, including, without limitation, the sale of equity, debt borrowing and/or the receipt of product licensing fees and royalties. We can provide no assurances that such financing will be obtained on terms satisfactory to the Company, if at all. Further, we can provide no assurances that one or more mutually acceptable licensing agreement(s) will be entered into on terms satisfactory to us, if at all. In this respect, see “Note 2” in our notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information as to the possibility that we may not be able to continue as a “going concern.”




15
 Table Of Contents





Off-balance sheet arrangements





We have no off-balance sheet arrangements including arrangements that would affect our liquidity, capital resources, market risk support and credit risk support or other benefits.





Officers convert accrued salaries and bonus into warrants




In November 2010, Steven Squires ($125,000), Brian Lukian ($234,375), David Doderer ($62,500), Robert Glass ($37,500), Ghassan Jabbour ($243,750), Andrew Robinson ($50,000) and Toshinon Ando ($35,000) converted the amount of monies set forth beside their names into five-year warrants to purchase 1,666,666 shares, 3,125,000 shares, 833,333 shares, 500,000 shares, 3,250,000 shares, 666,666 shares and 466,666 shares, respectively, In summary, a total of $788,125 was converted into warrants to purchase 10,508,331 shares exercisable at $.075 per share through the expiration date of November 4, 2015.




In May 2011, David Doderer ($81,250), Robert Glass ($61,250), Ghassan Jabbour ($62,500), Andrew Robinson ($50,000) and Toshinon Ando ($65,000) converted the amount of monies set forth beside their names into five-year warrants to purchase  738,636 shares, 556,818 shares, 568,181 shares, 454,545 shares and 590,909 shares, respectively, In summary, a total of $320,000 was converted into warrants to purchase 2,909,089 shares exercisable at $.11 per share through the expiration date of May 18, 2016.




Loans from Stephen Squires




In November 2008, Mr. Squires received 35,500,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock as part of a plan of reorganization, 20,000,000 of which he pledged to secure certain company indebtedness. Between December 2008 and December 2010, Mr. Squires privately sold an aggregate of approximately 13,431,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock for an aggregate of $595,000. Mr. Squires advanced to the Company cash loans and made payment of Company expenses utilizing $270,145 of the net proceeds of these private sales. On December 30, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized Mr. Squires to receive 10,000,000 restricted shares of Quantum Material Corp. in recognition of his support of the Company and in cancellation of all outstanding cash loans and advanced expenses totaling $270,145.




In January 2010, the board of directors granted Mr. Squires the option to convert his cash loans to the Company into common stock of the Company's subsidiary. In this respect, Mr. Squires has a two-year option to convert up to $200,000 into a maximum of 5% of the outstanding common stock of Solterra.  As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, Mr. Squires has declined to exercise this option.




16
 Table Of Contents




Results of operations – Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011





General and administrative expenses





During the three months ended September 30, 2012 the Company incurred $549,190 of general and administrative expenses a increase of $330,070 from the $219,120 recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2011.  The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in remuneration of staff of $329,801, which included expense for warrants issued in lieu of bonuses.





Included in the expenses for the current three months ended September 30, 2012 were remuneration of staff $502,626, legal and audit of $19,500, travel expense of $16,302, corporate expense of $1,978, and amortization of furniture and equipment of $409.  This compares to the three months ended September 30, 2011 which included remuneration of staff $172,825, legal and audit of $14,500, travel expense of $11,010, office expenses of $6,477, corporate expense of $2,264, other professional fees of $1,500, and amortization of furniture and equipment of $545.





Research and development expenses.





Research and development expenses of $4,000 were incurred in the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $7,272 in the three months ended September 30, 2011.  The decrease is the result of a decrease in patent expense of $4,281, a decrease in manufacturing of $2,992, and an increase in royalties of $4,000.





Amortization of convertible debenture discount





The convertible debenture discount of $1,500,000 is being amortized over the 36 month term of the debenture using the effective interest method.  The debenture was issued on November 4, 2008.  Amortization recorded for the three month period ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $nil and $257,144, respectively.  The amortized balance of the discount at September 30, 2012 is $nil resulting in the convertible debenture value on the balance sheet net of the discount $1,500,000.





Amortization of deferred finance cost





This amount relates to the $315,000 of expenses associated with the $1,500,000 convertible debenture financing raised in November 2008.  The deferred financing cost is being amortized using the effective interest method over the thirty-six month life of the debenture.  Amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $nil and $26,250, respectively.




17
 Table Of Contents





Interest expense on the convertible debenture





This amount relates to the 8% interest associated with the $1,500,000 convertible debenture issued in November 2008.




In September 2012 the Company issued 561,729 shares of common stock to pay accrued interest of $30,333 for the three month period ended September 1, 2012.




Interest expense recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $37,917 compared to $35,242 in the three month period ended September 30, 2011.




According to the provisions of the Convertible Debenture agreement the Company has elected to issue shares of the Company’s Stock to pay accrued interest on the debentures.  In the three months ended September 30, 2012 the Company issued 561,729 shares of the Company’s restricted Common Stock to pay $30,333 of accrued interest payable.  As the provision to pay stock for interest discounts the market price of the stock the Company has attributed this discount to interest expense and additional paid in capital.  However the timing of the shares being issued resulted in the share value being less than the interest paid therefore a decrease in interest expense was recorded of $7,583 for the period.





Change in fair value of warrants and embedded conversion feature





This amount relates to the change in value of the derivative liabilities.  The change recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was a decrease of $167,000 and a decrease of $522,000, respectively, decreasing the fair value of embedded conversion feature liability from $346,000 to $179,000.




Cash Flow





During the three months ended September 30, 2012, cash was used in operations of $48,108.  During this period the Company received proceeds from financing activities of $37,500.  These changes resulted in a decrease of $10,608 in the cash position for three months ended September 30, 2012.  The opening cash at June 30, 2012 was $15,262 and the closing balance at September 30, 2012 was $4,654.





Item 3.  Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk





Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our short term money market investments. The Company does not have any financial instruments held for trading or other speculative purposes and does not invest in derivative financial instruments, interest rate swaps or other investments that alter interest rate exposure. The Company does not have any credit facilities with variable interest rates.




18
 Table Of Contents





Item 4.  Controls and Procedures





The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that the information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on their evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective at September 30, 2012.  Management basis its determination upon the untimely filing of our Form 10-K for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and our Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2010, December 31, 2010, March 31, 2011, September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011.





We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all instances of fraud. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Further, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all our control deficiencies and instances of fraud, if any. The design of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.





Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting





In our Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2012.





Management did however identify a significant deficiency; a significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the registrant’s financial reporting.  Currently we do not have sufficient in-house expertise in US GAAP reporting.  Instead, we rely very much on the expertise and knowledge of external financial advisors in US GAAP conversion.  External financial advisors have helped prepare and review the consolidated financial statements.  This deficiency of not having sufficient qualified staff has resulted in the Company being unable to file our 10-K for the years ending June 30, 2011 and 2010 and our Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2010, December 31, 2010, March 31, 2011, September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011 in a timely manner.  Although we have not identified any material errors with our financial reporting or any material weaknesses with our internal controls, no assurances can be given that there are no such material errors or weaknesses existing.  To remediate this situation, we are seeking to recruit experienced professionals to augment and upgrade our financial staff to address issues of timeliness and completeness in US GAAP financial reporting.  In addition, we do not believe we have sufficient documentation with our existing financial processes, risk assessment and internal controls.  We plan to work closely with external financial advisors to document the existing financial processes, risk assessment and internal controls systematically.





We believe that the remediation measures we are taking, if effectively implemented and maintained, will remediate the significant deficiency discussed above.





Except as described above, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.




19
 Table Of Contents





PART II – OTHER INFORMATION





Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.





We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings. Our property is not the subject of any pending legal proceedings. To our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating commencing a legal proceeding in which we would be named as a party.




Item 1A. Risk Factors





As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item 1A.





Item 2.  UnregisteredSales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.




(a)
From July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012, we had the following sales of unregistered Common Stock.




Date of Sale
Title of Security

Number Sold

Consideration Received and Description of Underwriting or Other Discounts to Market Price or Convertible Security, Afforded to Purchasers
Exemption from Registration Claimed
If Option, Warrant or Convertible Security, terms of exercise or conversionJuly  2012
Common Stock


343,750

$27,500 cash received;

no commissions paid
Section 4(2); and/or

Rule 506
Not applicable.September  2012
Common Stock


125,000

$10,000 cash received;

no commissions paid
Section 4(2); and/or

Rule 506
Not applicable.September  2012
Common Stock


561,729

Shares issued in

exchange for $30,333

of interest through

September 1, 2012
Section 4(2); and/or

Rule 506
Not applicable.




(b)
Rule 463 of the Securities Act is not applicable to the Company.(c)
In the three months ended September 30, 2012, there were no repurchases by the Company of its Common Stock.


Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.None
 
 Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures – not applicable.
 
 Item 5.OtherInformation.
 
 See "Note 3 to the Financial Statements" for description of Various Related Party and Other Transactions


20
 Table Of Contents





. Item 6. Exhibits





The following exhibits are all previously filed in connection with our Form 8-K filed November 10, 2008, unless otherwise noted.





2.1
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of October 15, 2008, by and among Hague Corp., Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc., the shareholders of Solterra and Greg Chapman, as Indemnitor.4.1
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of November 4, 2008.4.2
Form of Security Agreement dated November 4, 2008.4.3
Form of Subsidiary Guarantee dated November 4, 2008.4.4
Form of Stock Pledge Agreement dated November 4, 2008.4.5
Form of Debenture-- MKM Opportunity Master Fund, Ltd.4.6
Form of Debenture.-- MKM SP1, LLC.4.7
Form of Debenture-- Steven Posner Irrevocable Trust u/t/a Dated 06/17/65.4.8
Form of Escrow Agreement.4.9
Form of Amended Waiver and Consent.4.10
Form of Registration Rights Agreement.4.11
Standstill Agreement dated June 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009).4.12
Amended Standstill Agreement dated June 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed November 12, 2009).4.13
Extension of Standstill Agreement dated October 29, 2009(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed November 12, 2009).10.1
License Agreement by and between William Marsh Rice University and Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc. dated August 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for its Quarter year ended March 31, 2009 filed May 15, 2009).10.2
Letter dated October 2, 2008 from Rice University amending the License Agreement contained in Exhibit 10.1.10.3
Agreement with Arizona State University executed by ASU on October 8, 2008 and executed by Solterra on September 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed November 12, 2009).10.4
Letters dated November 5, 2009 and November 9, 2009 amending Rice University Agreement (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed  November 12, 2009).10.5
Consulting Agreement between Steven Posner, Oceanus Capital and the issuer (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed November 12, 2009).10.6
Consulting Agreement between Sound Capital Inc and the issuer dated November 12, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).10.7
License Agreement between The University of Arizona and the issuer dated July 2009.  (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009)10.8
Agreement to amend the maturity date of the 8% Senior Secured Convertible Debenture to November 4, 2012.21.1
Subsidiaries of Registrant listing state of incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 filed on November 12, 2009).31(a)
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – Principal Executive Officer *31(b)
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – Principal Financial Officer *32(a)
Section 1350 Certification – Principal Executive Officer *32(b)
Section 1350 Certification – Principal Financial Officer *101.SCH
Document, XBRL Taxonomy Extension **101.CAL
Calculation Linkbase, XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition **101.DEF
Linkbase, XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels **101.LAB
Linkbase, XBRL Taxonomy Extension **101.PRE
Presentation Linkbase **


____________


*  Filed herewith.







21
 Table Of Contents





SIGNATURES








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




QUANTUM MATERIALS CORP.November 16, 2012
By:
/s/ Stephen SquiresStephen Squires,Principal Executive Officer





November 16, 2012
By:
/s/ Chris BenjaminChris Benjamin,Principal Financial Officer