alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        13 January 2023    

                    Unmanned Maritime Strike – Navy and Air Force at the Cutting Edge of Tactical Integration                 
                MEDITERRANEAN SEA – The U.S. Navy and the U.S. Air Force (USAF) partnered to complete first-of-a-kind exercises that incorporated Navy and USAF expertise and assets in December 2022. Jackpot Hooligan II – a maritime strike exercise, demonstrated the capability of an MQ-9 unmanned aerial            

        13 August 2021    

                    505th Command and Control Wing Supports Navy Large Scale Exercise 21                 
                U.S. Airmen from the 505th Combat Training Squadron and the 505th Communications Squadron, Hurlburt Field, Fla., are supporting the U.S. Navy Large Scale Exercise 21 – the biggest U.S. Navy exercise in a generation, according to Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday, July 28 - August 16.             

        13 August 2021    

                    505th Command and Control Wing Supports Navy Large Scale Exercise 21,'biggest U.S. Navy exercise in a generation'                 
                U.S. Airmen from the 505th Combat Training Squadron and the 505th Communications Squadron, Hurlburt Field, Fla., are supporting the U.S. Navy Large Scale Exercise 21 – the biggest U.S. Navy exercise in a generation, according to Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday, July 28 - August 16.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0045. A MINOR CHILD C. H., BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIANS

CHRISTOPHER JASON HOLLAND et al. v. VIEWPOINT HEALTH.

Minor child C. H., through his legal guardians, filed this tort action against

ViewPoint Health and minor child K. D. ViewPoint moved to dismiss the claims

asserted against it. Following a hearing, the trial court granted the motion, dismissing

the complaint with prejudice “as to ViewPoint Health.” C. H. then filed this direct

appeal, but we lack jurisdiction. 

OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) generally allows direct appeals from final judgments.

“In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer

than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final

judgment.” Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d

731) (1989) (punctuation omitted). Such a ruling may be appealed only if the trial

court makes an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and an

express direction for the entry of judgment under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b), or the party

seeking to appeal complies with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-

6-34 (b). See id.

The record before us contains no indication that the trial court directed the

entry of judgment under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or that C. H.’s claims against the

remaining defendant, K. D., have been dismissed.

1 Because the claims against K. D.

remain pending, the order dismissing the complaint as to ViewPoint is a non-final

1 At the hearing on ViewPoint’s motion to dismiss, the trial courtstated that K.

D. had not yet been served. 

August 17, 2021
order that did not resolve all issuesin the case. See Conseco Finance Servicing Corp.

v. Hill, 252 Ga. App. 774, 775 (1) (556 SE2d 468) (2001); Johnson, 192 Ga. App. at

629. Therefore, C. H. was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set

forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 SE2d

213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588-589 (1)

(408 SE2d 103) (1991). C. H.’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedure

deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/17/2021
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 28 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 9 of 9
# C_2009134EN.01000301.xml

| 13.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/3

---

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/M.4525 — Kronospan/Constantia

(Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision (2001/462/EC, ECSC) of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision (2001/462/EC, ECSC) of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

2009/C 134/03

On 4 May 2007, Kronospan Holding GmbH (‘Kronospan’, Germany) sent a notification to the Commission of an intended acquisition of Sprela GmbH (‘Sprela’, Germany), Falco CC (‘Falco’, Hungary) and of the raw and coated particleboard division of FunderMax GmbH (‘FunderMax’, Austria) from Constantia Industries AG.

Upon examination of the notification, the Commission concluded that the notified operation raised serious doubts as to the compatibility of the notified acquisition with the common market with regard to two product markets: (i) the market for raw particleboard and (ii) the market for coated particleboard, and decided to initiate proceedings pursuant to Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on 14 June 2007.

Access to key documents was provided to the notifying party on 20 June 2007, in accordance with paragraph 45 of DG Competition's Best Practices on the conduct of EC merger control proceedings.

On 12 July 2007, the parties proposed a modification to the notified transaction in order to remedy the serious concerns identified by the Commission to the effect that Kronospan will only acquire control in Sprela and Falco, whereas FunderMax will be retained by Constantia. The buyer also committed not to buy FunderMax for a certain period of time. The parties submitted a revised proposal for commitments on 31 July 2007.

The market test conducted by the Commission in the period between May and July 2007 confirmed that the proposed modifications remove the Commission's serious doubts as to the compatibility of the (modified) transaction with the common market and the EEA agreement.

The Commission decided therefore not to issue a Statement of Objections in the present case.

The Parties did not refer to me any concerns in terms of due process.

In the light of the above, I consider that the rights to be heard of all participants to the present proceeding have been respected.

Brussels, 10 September 2007.

Serge DURANDE

---
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 8 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1713 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a presumption of 

service-connection for certain veterans exposed to certain herbicides while 

serving in the Armed Forces, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2019 

Mr. SAN NICOLAS (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, and Mr. 

PALLONE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

presumption of service-connection for certain veterans 

exposed to certain herbicides while serving in the Armed 

Forces, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lonnie Kilpatrick Cen5 tral Pacific Relief Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1713 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRESUMPTIONS OF SERVICE-CONNECTION FOR 

2 CERTAIN VETERANS EXPOSED TO CERTAIN 

3 HERBICIDES WHILE SERVING IN THE ARMED 

4 FORCES. 

5 (a) EXPANSION OF PRESUMPTIONS.—Section 

6 1116(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting after 

8 ‘‘1975’’ the following: ‘‘, served on Guam or Amer9 ican Samoa, or in the territorial waters thereof, dur10 ing the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and 

11 ending on July 31, 1980, or served on Johnston 

12 Atoll or on a ship that called at Johnston Atoll dur13 ing the period beginning on January 1, 1972, and 

14 ending on September 30, 1977’’; and 

15 (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting after 

16 ‘‘1975’’ the following: ‘‘, served on Guam or Amer17 ican Samoa, or in the territorial waters thereof, dur18 ing the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and 

19 ending on July 31, 1980, or served on Johnston 

20 Atoll or on a ship that called at Johnston Atoll dur21 ing the period beginning on January 1, 1972, and 

22 ending on September 30, 1977,’’. 

23 (b) ELIGIBILITY FOR HOSPITAL CARE AND MEDICAL

24 SERVICES.—Section 1710(e)(4) is amended by striking 

25 subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new sub26 paragraph (A): 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1713 IH

1 ‘‘(A) The term ‘Vietnam-era herbicide-exposed 

2 veteran’ means a veteran who— 

3 ‘‘(i) served on active duty— 

4 ‘‘(I) in the Republic of Vietnam dur5 ing the period beginning on January 9, 

6 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975; 

7 ‘‘(II) on Guam or American Samoa, 

8 or in the territorial waters thereof, the pe9 riod beginning on January 9, 1962, and 

10 ending on July 31, 1980; or 

11 ‘‘(III) on Johnston Atoll or on a ship 

12 that called at Johnston Atoll during the 

13 period beginning on January 1, 1972, and 

14 ending on September 30, 1977; and 

15 ‘‘(ii) the Secretary finds may have been ex16 posed during such service to dioxin or was ex17 posed during such service to a toxic substance 

18 found in a herbicide or defoliant used for mili19 tary purposes during such period.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 4.30

 

Rights and Obligations Assumption Letter

 

This entity, Heze Qiqiaoban Education Technology Limited, is the subsidiary of BGY Education Investment Management Co., Ltd. (“Investor”) registered in Heze City at Economic Development Zone branch office of the Administration for Market Regulation on March 14, 2017. The Investor holds 85% of the interests in this entity.

 

In accordance with the Exclusive Management Service and Business Cooperation Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into by and between Investor, Zhuhai Hengqin Bright Scholar Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and other relevant parties on January 25, 2017, this entity shall join the Agreement according to Article 10.1 of the Agreement as a “New Subsidiary of Party B” under the Agreement.

 

This entity hereby agrees to join the Agreement as a new Subsidiary of Party B of the Investor, enjoy the rights under the Agreement, and perform the obligations according to the Agreement. This Assumption Letter came into effect upon the date of execution.

 

Heze Qiqiaoban Education Technology Limited

(Seal) Heze Qiqiaoban Education Technology Limited Affixed

 

	
By:
    	
/s/Qiuxia Guo
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Qiuxia Guo
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Legal Representative
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
December 10, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Gregory B. Milton, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2007



/s/ Gregory B. MiltonGregory B. Milton Chief Accounting Officer
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT 

 

 La Barbera, et al.

V. 1:07-cv-5713

 Juda Construction, Ltd. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled action is

reassigned to the calendar of

JUDGE RAKOFF

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk’s Office of

the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge’s initials after the case

number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

7/11/07

By: Tiffany Rodriguez

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS ASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 3 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
Clear All

        04 August 2023    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet Hosts Theatre Undersea Warfare Symposium                 
                Commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet held a Theater Undersea Warfare (TUSW) Symposium and Fleet Synthetic Training (FST) to collaborate between naval assets to face future undersea challenges at Naval Support Activity Hampton Roads, Norfolk, August 1-3.               

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Etelos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(b)                                 The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 19, 2009 | /s/ Daniel J.A. Kolke                      |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                         | Daniel J.A. Kolke, Chief Executive Officer |
|                         | (Principal  Executive Officer)             |

 

----
ARTICLE IREAFFIRMATION OF OBLIGATIONS OF THE GUARANTORS     Section 1.01 Reaffirmation  2      ARTICLE IIGUARANTEE OF NOTES     Section 2.01 Guarantee  2 Section 2.02 Execution and Delivery of Guarantee  3 Section 2.03 Limitation of Guarantee  3 Section 2.04 Release of Guarantor  4 Section 2.05 Assumption of Terms of the Indenture  4      ARTICLE IIIMISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS     Section 3.01 Terms Defined  4 Section 3.02 Indenture  4 Section 3.03 Governing Law  4 Section 3.04 Successors  4 Section 3.05 Multiple Counterparts  5 Section 3.06 Effectiveness  5 Section 3.07 Trustee Disclaimer  5 Section 3.08 Agent for Service, Submission to Jurisdiction, Waiver of Immunities  5 
 
i

 
FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE dated as of July 14, 2006, by and among CATALYST PAPERCORPORATION, formerly named NORSKE SKOG CANADA LIMITED, a Canadian corporation (the “COMPANY”),0606890 B.C. LTD., a British Columbia corporation (the “NEW GUARANTOR”), the guarantors set forthon the signature pages hereto (the “EXISTING GUARANTORS”, and together with the New Guarantor, the“GUARANTORS”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as trustee under the hereafter definedIndenture (the “TRUSTEE”).WHEREAS, the Company and the Existing Guarantors previously executed and delivered to theTrustee an indenture dated as of March 23, 2004 (the “Indenture”), providing for the issuance of anunlimited principal amount of the Company’s 7 3/8% Senior Notes Due March 1, 2014 (the “Notes”);andWHEREAS, there have been issued and are now outstanding under the Indenture, Notes in theaggregate principal amount of $250,000,000; andWHEREAS, the Company is the holder of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the NewGuarantor; andWHEREAS, the Indenture provides that under certain circumstances the New Guarantor shallexecute and deliver to the Trustee a supplemental indenture pursuant to which the New Guarantorshall unconditionally guarantee all of the Company’s obligations under the Notes and the Indentureon the terms and conditions set forth herein (the “Guarantee”); andWHEREAS, the New Guarantor desires, by this First Supplemental Indenture (the “ FirstSupplemental Indenture”), to unconditionally guarantee all of the Company’s obligations under theNotes and the Indenture on the terms set forth herein; andWHEREAS, the Existing Guarantors desire, by this First Supplemental Indenture, to expresslyreaffirm, jointly and severally, the obligations of the Existing Guarantors under the Indenture andunder Guarantees endorsed on the Notes; andWHEREAS, all the conditions and requirements necessary to make this First SupplementalIndenture a valid, binding and legal instrument in accordance with its terms have been performedand fulfilled by the parties hereto and the execution and delivery thereof have been in allrespects duly authorized by the parties hereto.
 
 

 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, each party agrees, for the benefit ofthe others and for the equal and ratable benefit of the Holders of the Notes, as follows:**ARTICLE I**
Case 1:07-cv-05322-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05322-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - 21st Century Sailor and Marine 
                            - Aircraft 
                            - Awards and Recognition 
                            - Biographies 
                            - Biographies 
                            - Chief of Naval Operations 
                            - Christening 
                            - Commissioning 
                            - Community Outreach 
                            - Current Readiness 
                            - Diversity 
                            - Energy Savings Initiative 
                            - Environmental Initiative 
                            - Environmental Stewardship 
                            - Family Readiness 
                            - Fleet of the Future 
                            - Future Readiness 
                            - Global Operations 
                            - Health and Fitness 
                            - Home Slideshow 
                            - Humanitarian Operations 
                            - Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy 
                            - Morale, Welfare and Recreation 
                            - Navy Casualty  
                            - Navy History and Heritage 
                            - Navy Medicine 
                            - Navy Reserve 
                            - Operation Enduring Freedom 
                            - Other 
                            - Pay and Benefits 
                            - Piracy 
                            - Ready, Relevant Learning 
                            - Research 
                            - Safety 
                            - SAPR 
                            - Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics 
                            - Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 
                            - Ships 
                            - STEM 
                            - Training and Education 
                            - Uniform Matters 
                            - Wounded Warrior 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

230724-N-CQ682-6999.JPGPhoto By: MCC Lauren Howes

NORFOLK, Va. - Large Scale Exercise 2023DOWNLOAD PHOTO(3.3 MB)                This photograph is considered public domain and has been cleared for release. If you would like to republish please give the photographer appropriate credit. Further, any commercial or non-commercial use of this photograph or any                other DoD image must be made in compliance with guidance found at            http://www.dimoc.mil/resources/limitations.html                , which pertains to                intellectual property restrictions (e.g., copyright and trademark, including                the use of official emblems, insignia, names and slogans), warnings                regarding use of images of identifiable personnel, appearance of                endorsement, and related matters.            Back to Gallery