alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        05 March 2024    

                    AIRLANT kicks off Active-Duty Fund Drive to support Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society                 
                The official kick-off ceremony for this year’s Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society (NMCRS) Active-Duty Fund Drive (ADFD) was held at U.S. Fleet Forces Command Headquarters on board Naval Support Activity Hampton Roads, March 5. This year’s NMCRS ADFD chair is Rear Adm. Doug Verissimo,            

        26 January 2023    

                    Largest U.S.-Israeli Exercise in History Concludes                 
                Exercise Juniper Oak 23.2 involved roughly 6,400 U.S. service members alongside more than 1,500 Israeli troops.            

        13 August 2021    

                    505th Command and Control Wing Supports Navy Large Scale Exercise 21                 
                U.S. Airmen from the 505th Combat Training Squadron and the 505th Communications Squadron, Hurlburt Field, Fla., are supporting the U.S. Navy Large Scale Exercise 21 – the biggest U.S. Navy exercise in a generation, according to Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday, July 28 - August 16.             

        13 August 2021    

                    505th Command and Control Wing Supports Navy Large Scale Exercise 21,'biggest U.S. Navy exercise in a generation'                 
                U.S. Airmen from the 505th Combat Training Squadron and the 505th Communications Squadron, Hurlburt Field, Fla., are supporting the U.S. Navy Large Scale Exercise 21 – the biggest U.S. Navy exercise in a generation, according to Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday, July 28 - August 16.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
CIRCULAR NO.

Date: June 21, 2005

205 JUN 21 AN 9 5]

OFC. GF TRE SECRETARIAT

Authorized by:
Satish Nandapurkar

us

To: Related Circulars/Bulletins:
All Eurex US Members and ISVs Circular No.

(Central Coordinators)

Priority: Contact:

Low Functional Helpdesk

+1-312-544-1122

Bulletin Attached []

Binding Circular [] Informational Circular X)

Content may be most important for:

All Departments

Attachments:

a

Eurex US Overnight Market Supervision to Remain in Frankfurt, Germany

Beginning July 1, 2005, Eurex US will take the following actions:

e — Until further notice, Eurex US will maintain its overnight market supervision function in Frankfurt,
Germany from 12:00 A.M. to 7:00 A.M., Chicago time to be conducted by Eurex Frankfurt A.G.

« Eurex US will move the overnight market supervision function back to Chicago should the overnight
trading volume average 50,000 contracts or above during overnight hours for at least two weeks in a

row.

If you have any questions regarding this topic, please contact the Eurex US Functional Helpdesk at

+1 (312) 544-1122.

PAGE 1/1
1 

Exhibit C 

AEGIS SEF, LLC 

Fitness Standards for Board of Directors, and its Composition, for Applicant 

Attach as Exhibit C, a narrative that sets forth the fitness standards for the Board of Directors 

and its composition including the number and percentage of public directors.

Response 

AEGIS SEF, LLC is controlled by AEGIS Hedging Solutions, LLC. Information pertaining to 

AEGIS Hedging, LLC included below. 

AEGIS Hedging Solutions, LLC considers numerous factors when determining the composition 

of its board, including the following: 

 Each member should have an exemplary reputation; 

 Each member must demonstrate strong leadership skills; 

 Each member must have a clear understanding of financial matters including being able 

to review Company reports and be able to discuss matters intellectually and effectively; 

 Each member must have strong ethics and morals at the core of their approach in their 

personal and business dealings; 

 Each member must have significant educational and business experience; 

 Each member must have experience in utilizing outside resources to supplement 

specific knowledge gaps; 

 Each member must have an understanding of over-the-counter swaps, including fixed 

price or options, puts, calls, collars, and other cash-settled transactions constituting 

“swaps” under the Dodd-Frank Act (though excluding futures and any swaps subject to a 

clearing requirement); 

 Each member must have an understanding of the role of a Commodity Trading Advisor 

(“CTA”) and the related regulatory environment; and 

 Each member must have an understanding of the End-User Exception under the DoddFrank Act and its application to hedge or mitigate commercial risk. 

All Board Members will receive sufficient training in order to understand their responsibilities to 

exercise sound judgement in matters regarding operations, management, growth, and 

compliance. 

The Board of AEGIS Hedging Solutions, LLC contains 5 members as listed in Exhibit B, 

including three public directors (60%).
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify
that the foregoing Quarterly Report of CLAIMSNET.COM INC. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"):

         (1)      Fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Paul W. Miller
-----------------------------
Paul W. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
April 1, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH     Document 10      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH     Document 10      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Chesapeake Bay Activities 
-  Science 

# Watershed Characterization and Protection

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

link

February 1, 2023

####                 USGS Collaborates on Maryland Healthy Watersheds Assessment              

Chesapeake Bay Activities

link

February 1, 2023

####   USGS Collaborates on Maryland Healthy Watersheds Assessment

Learn More

link

September 27, 2022

####                 New high-resolution, land-use and change data improves decision-making in the Chesapeake Bay watershed              

Chesapeake Bay Activities

link

September 27, 2022

####   New high-resolution, land-use and change data improves decision-making in the Chesapeake Bay watershed

Learn More

link

June 28, 2022

####                 A Science-Based Approach for Targeting Resources to Achieve Multiple Chesapeake Outcomes              

Chesapeake Bay Activities

link

June 28, 2022

####   A Science-Based Approach for Targeting Resources to Achieve Multiple Chesapeake Outcomes

Learn More

link

April 30, 2020

####                 New dataset available on stream and floodplain geometry to inform restoration decisions              

Core Science Systems Mission Area, Chesapeake Bay Activities, Florence Bascom Geoscience Center, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center, Maryland-Delaware-D.C. Water Science Center, South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

link

April 30, 2020

####   New dataset available on stream and floodplain geometry to inform restoration decisions

Learn More

link

December 1, 2017

####                 USGS 3D Elevation Program Supports Science Activities in the Chesapeake Watershed              

Chesapeake Bay Activities

link

December 1, 2017

####   USGS 3D Elevation Program Supports Science Activities in the Chesapeake Watershed

Learn More
**Exhibit
      14.4**





**Ariel
      Way, Inc. Internal Control**





Ariel
      Way
      employees are required to comply with our Code of Business Conduct. In addition,
      employees are encouraged to report any suspected violation of Ariel Way policy
      (including violations of accounting or auditing policies) or laws governing
      our
      business by Ariel Way employees.





If
      you
      have any doubts about whether any employee is adhering to these principles,
      you
      should feel free to discuss the matter with your supervisor, the financial
      manager for your unit or Ariel Way's Corporate Legal Counsel.





Employees
      will not be disciplined or suffer retaliation for reporting suspected violations
      honestly and in good faith. You will not be required to identify yourself if
      you
      prefer not to. All reports will be confidential except as necessary to conduct
      investigations.
The HONORABLE RICHARD H. BATTEY, Chief Judge, United State s 1 District Court for the District of South Dakota.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1221

___________ Raymond Earl Osloond, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Theodore J. Vore; Elizabeth A. Benning; * Sheila R. Aaker; Fred W. Romkema, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 8, 1998 Filed: September 11, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Raym ond Earl Osloond appeals from the district court & s order grantin g 1 defendan ts summary judgment. After careful review of the record and the parties ’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.-2- Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24176-24177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11949]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or 
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From Requirements

    Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 235 and 
49 U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroads have petitioned the Federal 
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval for the discontinuance 
or modification of the signal system or relief from the requirements of 
49 CFR part 236 as detailed below.
Docket No. FRA-2001-9021
    Applicant: Canadian National/Illinois Central, Mr. L.W. Winn, 
Manager-Signal & Communications, 2921 Horn Lake Road, Memphis, 
Tennessee 38109.
    The Illinois Central Railroad seeks approval of the proposed 
discontinuance and removal of the power-operated switch and associated 
signal arrangement, at milepost 362.5, on the Gulf Division, Baton 
Rouge Subdivision, near Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
    The reason given for the proposed changes is that the switch and 
signal arrangement is no longer necessary, because it is within yard 
limits where all movements must be coordinated with the person in 
charge of the yard, at Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
    Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an 
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the 
protest is made, and contain a concise statement of the interest of the 
party in the proceeding. Additionally, one copy of the protest shall be 
furnished to the applicant at the address listed above.
    All communications concerning this proceeding should be identified 
by the docket number and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room Pl-401, Washington, DC 20590-
0001. Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice 
will be considered by the FRA before final action is taken. Comments 
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All 
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.--5 p.m.) at DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401 (Plaza Level), 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. All documents in the 
public docket are also available for inspection and copying on the 
internet at the

[[Page 24177]]

docket facility's Web site at 
http://dms.dot.gov.
    FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral 
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is 
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present 
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set 
for public hearing.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 7, 2001.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator forSafety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 01-11949 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
A92A1590.

#### OKROSS v. THE STATE.

(423 SE2d 291)

Johnson, Judge.

Stephen Okross was convicted by a jury of driving under the influence and striking a fixed object. He appeals from his conviction and the denial of his motion for new trial.

We are troubled by the procedural posture of this case. An order denying Okross’ motion for a new trial was entered by the trial court on March 5, 1992. That order was vacated, however, on March 12, 1992. Okross alleges in his appeal that the motion for a new trial “was denied on April 2, 1992 at an evidentiary hearing.” Overlooking that a hearing on a motion for new trial in this case would not be an evidentiary hearing since there is no assertion of newly discovered evidence, no order reflecting the denial of the motion is included in the record on appeal.

“Even without a motion to dismiss the appeal, it is the duty of the reviewing court to entertain the threshold question of its jurisdiction where there may be any doubt.” (Citations and punctuation omitted,) *Royal v. State,*189 Ga. App. 756, 757 (1) (377 SE2d 526) (1989). In *Royal*as well as in *Eller v. State,*183 Ga. App. 724 (360 *695SE2d 53) (1987) and *Shirley v. State,*188 Ga. App. 357 (373 SE2d 257) (1988), the notice of appeal preceded the entry of the denial of a motion for new trial. In all those cases the notice of appeal became effective upon the entry of the final judgment.

Decided October 2, 1992.

*Fletcher W. Griffin III,*for appellant.

*Gerald N. Blaney, Jr., Solicitor, David M. Fuller, Assistant Solicitor,*for appellee.

This court endeavors to review criminal appeals on their merits. See *Eller,*supra. Despite numerous inquiries from the office of the clerk of this court, no final order denying the motion for new trial has been submitted to supplement the record prior to our consideration of the case. According to the records of the Clerk of the State Court of Gwinnett County, no such order has been filed. In the absence of a final order, we are constrained to hold that no final judgment has been entered in the case and jurisdiction remains vested in the trial court.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Carley, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 10.02

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

      THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the "AGREEMENT") is made and entered into
effective as of December 14, 2005, by and between NANOSCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "COMPANY") and CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP (the "INVESTOR").

                                    RECITALS:

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor entered into (i) a Standby Equity
Distribution Agreement (the "STANDBY EQUITY DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT"); (ii) a
Registration Rights Agreement (the "REGISTRATION RIGHTS Agreement"); an Escrow
Agreement (the "ESCROW AGREEMENT"); and (iii) a Placement Agent Agreement (the
"PLACEMENT AGENT AGREEMENT") with ; all of which are dated December 13, 2004
(collectively, the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement, the Registration
Rights Agreement, and the Escrow Agreement, Placement Agent Agreement and the
Compensation Debenture are referred to as the "TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS."

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual promises,
conditions and covenants contained herein and in the Transaction Documents and
other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto agree as follows:

      1.    TERMINATION. Each of the parties to this Agreement hereby terminates
            the Transaction Documents and the respective rights and obligations
            contained therein. As a result of this provision, none of the
            parties shall have any rights or obligations under or with respect
            to the Transaction Documents.

      2.    FEES. The Investor shall retain any and all fees set forth in
            Section 12 of the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement, which have
            previously been paid. The Investor shall retain the portion of the
            commitment fee consisting of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand
            (125,000) shares of common stock of the Company, which shall have
            "piggy-back" registration rights.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and delivered this Termination
Agreement on the date first set forth above.

NANOSCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                     CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP

By:      /s/ David Rector                          By: Yorkville Advisors, LLC
   --------------------------------------          Its: General Partner
Name:    David Rector
Title:   Secretary, Chief Operating Officer

                                                   By: /s/ Mark A. Angelo
                                                       -------------------------
                                                   Name:  Mark A. Angelo
                                                   Title: Portfolio Manager
# CE2011308EN.01009701.xml

| 20.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 308/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 308/97

---

Tuesday 7 September 2010Agreement between the EU and Japan on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters ***

P7_TA(2010)0297

European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 September 2010 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters (05308/2010 – C7-0029/2010 – 2009/0188(NLE))

2011/C 308 E/25

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the draft Council decision (05308/2010),

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and Japan on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters (15915/2009),

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1), second subparagraph, point (d) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0029/2010),

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0209/2010),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Japan. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Japan.

---
Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 27 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 27 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 27 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 15
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
H. Shea, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: February 24, 2011 |  | /s/ William H. Shea, Jr.
|                        |  | William H. Shea, Jr.    
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer 

This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by
the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.