alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 7:07-cv-03602-CS-GAY     Document 18      Filed 07/07/2008     Page 1 of 5

Case 7:07-cv-03602-CS-GAY     Document 18      Filed 07/07/2008     Page 2 of 5

Case 7:07-cv-03602-CS-GAY     Document 18      Filed 07/07/2008     Page 3 of 5

Case 7:07-cv-03602-CS-GAY     Document 18      Filed 07/07/2008     Page 4 of 5

Case 7:07-cv-03602-CS-GAY     Document 18      Filed 07/07/2008     Page 5 of 5
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 11, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 11, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0134. FIRST AMERICAN ASSETS LLC et al. v. MARY ALICE GRAVITT et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 20SUCV0678
Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TEECO PROPERTIES
L.P. FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         342,000
<SECURITIES>                                   104,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 510,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     423,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   510,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               303,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (285,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (285,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (285,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.044)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.044)


</TABLE>
**CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED**

**BY FORECASTEX LLC**

**Exhibit G**

**ForecastEx LLC**

**Formation Documents**

**March 2022**

**Attach as Exhibit G, a copy of the constitution, articles of incorporation, formation or**

**association with all amendments thereto, partnership or limited liability agreements,**

**and existing by-laws, operating agreement, rules or instruments corresponding**

**thereto, of the Applicant. Include any additional governance fitness information not**

**included in Exhibit C. Provide a certificate of good standing dated within one week of**

**the date of this Form DCM.**

· Exhibit G-1 is reserved.

· ForecastEx’s formation documents are attached as Exhibit G-2.

· A certificate of good standing is attached as Exhibit G-3.

· The LLC agreement is attached as Exhibit G-4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-1080; MM Docket No. 00-165; RM-9941] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In response to a proposal filed on behalf of Southern Broadcasting of Athens, Inc., the Commission reallots Channel 279C3 from Royston to Arcade, Georgia, as that community's first local aural transmission service, and modifies the license for Station WPUP(FM) accordingly.                         *See*65 FR 56858, September 20, 2000. Coordinates used for Channel 279C3 at Arcade are 34-15-09 NL; 83-28-28 WL.                     

# DATES:

Effective June 11, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-165, adopted April 18, 2001, and released April 27, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Radio broadcasting

Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.202 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Georgia, is amended by adding Arcade, Channel 279C3, and by removing Royston, Channel 279C3. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 01-12088 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-24 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 15
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1019
ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALBERT J. LOWRY, Personally, and as agent for IMPERIAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Previously EAI and ES, L.L.C.; BRADLEY LOUIS BOOKE, Esquire, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv02878-RWT) Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 16, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. In his informal and supplemental briefs on appeal, Fiorani failed to address the district court’s conclusion that his action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Accordingly, Fiorani has waived appellate review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0635 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SAUL JAMES DOOLING,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 17, 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 10 2024

04/10/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0635
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10 - 20 - 00096 - CR IN RE LESTER DAVIS Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION Lester Davis, an inmate, requests that we grant his petition for writ of mandamus and order the trial court to withdraw his judgment of conviction and release him from confinement. Davis claims that the indictment against him was “fraudulent” because it was not the product of the January 2012 grand jury. We affirmed Davis’s judgment on direct appeal. See Davis v. State , No. 10

- 13

- 00390

- CR, 2014 WL 2946420 (Tex. App.

— Waco June 26, 2014) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Davis’s petition for discretionary review was refused by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Davis’s numerous petitions for habeas corpus have als o been rejected by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, resulting in sanctions imposed againstIn r e Davis Page 2

him by that court for abuse of the writ. See Ex parte Davis , No. WR

- 33,426

- 18, 2018 WL 3569033 (Tex. Crim. App. July 25, 2018) (order). Once a felony convictio n becomes final, as in this case, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to review post

- conviction collateral attacks on th at conviction. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 11.07; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (T ex. Crim. App. 1991); In re McIntosh , No. 10

- 19

- 00442

- CR, 2019 WL 6954204, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Waco Dec. 18, 2019, no pet.). Accordingly, because Davis complains about a final felony conviction and only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction regardin g his complaints, Davis’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Petition d ismissed Do not publish Opini on delivered and filed March 2 3 , 2020 [ OT 06]
Case 1:07-cv-05423-AKH     Document 3      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 48-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 48-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Annunziata and Overton 

Argued by Teleconference 

DEBORAH ARTIS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 2131-96-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 APRIL 29, 1997 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 

Edward W. Hanson, Jr., Judge 

 Wm. Brandon Baade for appellant. 

 Thomas D. Bagwell, Senior Assistant Attorney 

General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney 

General, on brief), for appellee. 

 Deborah Artis was convicted by a jury of grand larceny. 

She appeals, contending that she was denied her right of 

allocution. For the reasons that follow, we affirm her 

conviction. 

 The parties are fully conversant with the record in the 

cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no 

precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. 

 Although the trial transcript confirms that the trial judge 

never explicitly asked Artis whether she had anything she wished 

to say before he pronounced judgment, it also reveals that Artis 

did have an opportunity to speak if she desired. See Stamper v. 

Commonwealth, 220 Va. 260, 280, 257 S.E.2d 808, 822 (1979). 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

Artis, however, did not request to speak, nor did her counsel 

object to the judge’s pronouncement without allocution. 

 Furthermore, the sentencing order recites the fact that the 

judge granted Artis her right to allocution. Artis did not 

object to the order within twenty-one days. "Where a defendant 

does not object to the accuracy of an order within 21 days after 

its entry, an appellate court may ‘presume that the order, as the 

final pronouncement on the subject, rather than a transcript that 

may be flawed by omissions, accurately reflects what 

transpired.’" Kern v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 84, 88, 341 

S.E.2d 397, 400 (1986) (quoting Stamper, 220 Va. at 280-81, 257 

S.E.2d at 822). 

 Accordingly, we affirm the conviction. 

 Affirmed.
## **EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTRED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Arden Group, Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries

We consent to theinclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arden Group, Inc. for the yearended December 30, 2006 and to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement on Forms S-8 (No. 333-46704 and 333-69787) of Arden Group, Inc. ofour report dated March 13, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financialstatements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| /s/ Moss  Adams LLP |   |
|---------------------|--------|

 

**MOSS ADAMS LLP**

Los Angeles, California

March 13, 2007

----
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3864

_____________________________

GREGORY BENNETT ISMERT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Terry D. Terrell, Judge.

November 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
OneChicago x

141 West Jackson, Suite 2240
Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 20,2006:

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan .
Secretary —
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: — Security Futures Products Rule Submission and Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to section 5e(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the
“Act”), and section 41.24 of the regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Act,
OneChicago, LLC (‘‘OneChicago”) submits herewith a rule amendment to Supplement No. 23 to
OneChicago Rule 1005. The rule amendment will be effective on December 21, 2006.

On December 15, 2006, OneChicago filed a rule certification relating to Contract
Specification Supplement, number 23 to OneChicago Rule 1005 for a new select index futures
contract which stated the share components for Teck Cominco Ltd was 500. The corrected
version now reads 300.

There are no opposing views that are not incorporated into this rule amendment.

On behalf of OneChicago, I hereby certify that that the amendment to the initial
listing standard for single stock futures complies with the Act and regulations promulgated
thereunder.

/s/__ Robert Walsh
Chief Operating Officer
OneChicago, LLC



Contract Specifications Supplement

To

OneChicago Rule 1005

Supplement No: 23
Title of Stock Index Future: OneChicago Select Index H

Underlying Securities (including numbers of | Symbol Stock Name Initial Shares
values thereof): BCE BCE Inc. 800
BMO Bank of Montreal 300
CDN Imperial Bank of
CM Commerce 200
TCK Teck Cominco Ltd. 500-300
TD Toronto-Dominion Bank 300
TransCanada
TRP Corporation 600
Weighting Methodology: No Change
Trading Hours: No Change
Delivery Months: No Change
Termination Dates: No Change
Minimum Price Fluctuation: No Change,
Legal Width Market: No Change No Change
No Change No Change
No Change No Change
No Change No Change
Position Limit: No Change
Reportable Position: No Change
Daily Price Limit: No Change
Time Period for Reporting Block Trades: No Change
Last Day of Trading: No Change
Delivery Day: No Change
Depositary for Underlying Securities: No Change

Other Specifications:

No Change
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Chester LEWIS, a/k/a Big Tony, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6227.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: April 30, 2013.

Antonio Chester Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Siebert, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Chester Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(2010). We conclude that the district court properly determined that Lewis was ineligible for a sentence reduction because his sentencing range was determined by his career offender designation, not the drug quantities attributable to him, and thus was not impacted by Amendment 750. *United States v. Munn,*595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. *United States v. Lewis,*No. 3:05-cr-00107-JAG-1 (E.D.Va. Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Anthony Gardino et al., Plaintiffs, v Louis Rescignano et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Frank Pasztor et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Aronson, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Aronson, J.H.O.— summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.
October 24, 2005

Via E-Mail

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 05.182: Notification
of Amendments to COMEX Division Rule 104.36, Exchange for
Physicals.

Dear Ms. Jean Webb:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange" is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or Commission”) of amendments to
COMEX Rule 104.36, Exchanges for Physicals.

Effective Wednesday, October 26, 2005, COMEX Rule 104.36 is amended to remove
examples cited under the “Interpretation of EFPs” of non-permissible day-time EFPs. The
removal of the examples does not change the meaning of the Rule, but addresses concerns that
the Interpretation is unclear because it addresses only day-time EFPs. Pursuant to Section Sc(c)
of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies
that the attached rule amendment complies with the Act, including regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact me at (212)
299-2940.

Very truly yours,

Nancy M. Minett
Vice President, Compliance

cc: Thomas LaSala
Brian Regan



(Underlining in bold indicates additions; strikethroughs in bold indicate deletions.)

COMEX Rule 104.36, Exchanges for Physicals, and Associated Interpretation
Sections (a) through (g) remain unchanged.

Interpretation of the Governors Committee of Commodity Exchange, Inc. Regarding
Exchanges of Futures for Physicals ("EFP")

Essential Elements and Other Indicia of a Bona Fide EFP — Remains unchanged.

Ownership of the Physical Commodity

Questions have arisen as to the permissibility of an EFP involving the transfer of a physical

offsetting the cash commodity component of the EFP. For-example,-trader-may_purchase the
h ity . immediat fi

" H-it-te-th
ry P

ity andy dition that h

Deleted: whick involve contingent
| Accordingly, No EFP which is linked to entry into a second, offsetting cash trade may be _____..- (Deleted: orcomtingent upon)

transacted during COMEX's business hours at any time that COMEX offers trading in its
contracts, unless trading in a market is halted, such as during a physical emergency.

Recordkeeping — Remains Unchanged
Case 7:07-cv-05802-KMK-GAY Document 2 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alton Burrows, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — burglary, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Garrett, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered May 20, 1981, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The plea allocution was sufficient to establish the defen*637dant’s guilt of felony murder based on his accessorial liability for the crime of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 20.00, 125.25 [3]; § 160.15 [1]). The defendant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH     Document 15      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1