alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[EXHIBIT 31.2]


                          CERTIFICATION


I, Jack Chien, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Med Gen,
Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quaterly report;

Date:  February 13, 2004



                                        By:____/s/Jack Chien__________
                                           Jack Chien
                                           Chief Financial Officer, and
                                           Principal Accounting Officer
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

SUSANA RODRIGUEZ (AND HUSBAND JOSE 

RODRIGUEZ) 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OF AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

90 CHURCH STREET LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, ET. AL., CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 05315 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC Co. LLC 

f/k/a WFP Tower A Co. L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC G.P. Corp. f/k/a WFP 

Tower A Co. GP Corp., WFP Tower B Co L.P. and WFP Tower B Co. GP Corp. 

(collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set 

forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master 

Complaint fil~d in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' 

Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the 

matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 

102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October )S 2007 

er & Blee, LLP 

Y: wplia~J.·l. ~iCh~W691~37) 

:~~·~m~;fi~·~d::P.;~ties 

.New York, NY 10006 

(212) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Exhibit 31.1]



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a)/RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Paul B. Kravitz, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A-1 of Med Gen, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to

the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

[Not applicable]



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





---

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  August 5, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|Med Gen, Inc.          
|(Registrant)           
|                       
|By: /s/ Paul B. Kravitz
|Paul B. Kravitz        
|Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James T. Barry, certify that:

     1. I  have  reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PASSUR Aerospace,
        Inc.;

     2. Based  on  my  knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
        statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
        to  make  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
        such  statements  were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period
        covered by this Annual Report;

         Date: February 1, 2013
                                             By:   /s/ James T. Barry
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   James T. Barry
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan

ORDER

People of MI v Christian Andrew Gardner

Docket No. 350756

LC No. 18-006144-01-FC

Anica Letica 

Presiding Judge

Mark J. Cavanagh 

Karen M. Fort Hood 

Judges

The April 29, 2021 majority opinion is hereby AMENDED to correct a clerical error. In 

the first paragraph of Section II, on page two of the opinion, the second sentence is amended to read: "We 

agree." 

In all other respects, the April 29, 2021 majority opinion remains unchanged.

_______________________________

Presiding Judge
Ex-10.1



 






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.1




Schedule of Nonemployee Director Compensation

(Effective January 1, 2006)




	 	 	 	 	 
	Standard Compensation
	 	 	 	 
	Board Member Standard Retainer
	 	$	49,000	 
	Board Meeting Fee (per meeting)
	 	$	2,000	 
	Committee Meeting Fee (per meeting)
	 	$	1,500	 
	 

	Special Retainers
	 	 	 	 
	Lead Independent Director Retainer
	 	$	50,000	 
	Audit Committee Chairman Retainer
	 	$	20,000	 
	Risk Management Committee Chairman Retainer
	 	$	15,000	 
	Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer
	 	$	15,000	 
	Executive Committee Chairman Retainer
	 	$	—	 
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman Retainer
	 	$	—	 





All retainers will be paid quarterly, with 60% paid in the form of fully vested stock grants and
40% paid in cash. Meeting fees will be paid in cash.
Case 1:07-cv-07955-GEL Document 22 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 1:07-cv-05649-GEL Document 5 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-07955-GEL Document 22 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 2 Case 1:07-cv-05649-GEL Document 5 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Cite as State v. Weir , 2022-Ohio-330.] 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNT Y STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

- v - KEVIN A. WEIR, Defendant-Appellant. CASE NO. 2021-A-0032

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas

Trial Court No. 2016 CR 00465

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Decided: Februar y 7, 2022 Jud g ment: Appeal dismissed

Colleen M. O’Toole , Ashtabula County Prosecutor, and Shelley M. Pratt , Assistant Prosecutor, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH 44047-1092 (For PlaintiffAppellee )

. Kevin A. Weir, pro se, PID# A691-188, Belmont Correctional Institution, 68518 Bannock Road, P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH 43950 ( Defendant-Appellant )

.

MATT LYNCH, J. {¶1} Appellant, Kevin A. Weir, filed a pro se notice of appeal on Oc tober 25, 2021, from an October 12, 2021 judgment entry of the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion for judicial release under R.C. 2929.2 0. {¶2} In State v. Coffman, 91 Ohio St.3d 125, 126 (2001), the Supreme Court of Ohio held that the denial of a motion for shock probation under the former R.C. 2947.061 is never a final appealable order. The General Assembly replac ed shock probation with judicial release, effective July 1, 1996.2

Case No. 2021-A-0032 {¶3} Ohio courts have held that the same logic regarding finality ap plies to the denial of a motion for judicial release. The denial of a motio n for judicial release cannot affect a “substantial right” as that term is defined in R.C. 25 05.02(A) because the trial court judge has full discretion whether to grant or deny judici al release. It is simply not a final appealable order. State v. Cruz, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109770, 2021-Ohio-947; State v. Zakrajsek , 11th Dist. Ashtabula No. 2018-A-0033, 2018-Ohio-1885; State v. Williams, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 95359, 2011-Ohio-120, at ¶ 10-11; State v. Ingram, 10th Dist. Franklin No. 03AP-149, 2003-Ohio-5380, ¶ 6-7; State v. Burgess, 2d Dist. Greene No. 01-CA-87, 2002-Ohio-2594. {¶4} Therefore, this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, for lac k of a final appealable order. {¶5} Appeal dismissed.

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J., JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,

concur.
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Karim Karaman, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Preem Holdings AB (publ);

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 28, 2005

| |  | By: |  | /s/KARIM KARAMANName: Karim Karaman
Title: Managing Director
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### WRIGHT, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED SAV. & LOAN ASS’N, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Jennie T. A. Wright against the Consolidated Savings & Loan Association.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed.
Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF     Document 35      Filed 06/10/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF     Document 35      Filed 06/10/2008     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 5 of 5
cme @

Chicago Mercantile Exchange
20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax

www,cme.com

January 6, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21* Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Section 5c(c)(1) and Regulation Section 40.6. Certification of Revisions to the Goldman
Sachs Commodity Index Normalizing Constant for 2006. CME Submission #06-03.

Dear Ms. Webb:

On January 6, 2006, Goldman Sachs set the 2006 Normalizing Constant to be used for settlement
of the February 2006 through January 2007 Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (“GSCI”) Futures
and Options contracts. Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME) hereby notifies the
Commission that the 2006 Normalizing Constant is 5689.593

The Exchange certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
regulations thereunder.

If we can be of any assistance to you in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Paul
Peterson at (312) 930-4587 or via e-mail at ppeterso@cme.com.

Sincerely,
Case 1:07-cv-05734-SHS     Document 10      Filed 12/19/2007     Page 1 of 1
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1579 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to require that the POW/MIA flag 

be displayed on all days that the flag of the United States is displayed 

on certain Federal property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself and Mr. BERGMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to require that 

the POW/MIA flag be displayed on all days that the 

flag of the United States is displayed on certain Federal 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National POW/MIA 

5 Flag Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1579 IH

1 SEC. 2. DAYS ON WHICH THE POW/MIA FLAG IS DISPLAYED 

2 ON CERTAIN FEDERAL PROPERTY. 

3 Section 902 of title 36, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(c) DAYS FOR FLAG DISPLAY.—For the purposes 

7 of this section, POW/MIA flag display days are all days 

8 on which the flag of the United States is displayed.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.2


                                 Amendment No. 1
                                     to the
                           Citizens Utilities Company
                Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Fee Equity Plan
                  (as Amended and Restated as of May 18, 2004)

1.  Section  6.1 of  the  Citizens  Utilities  Company  Non-Employee  Directors'
Deferred  Fee Equity  Plan (as Amended  and  Restated  as of May 18,  2004) (the
"Plan") shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

          "Crediting Stock Plan Accounts.

               The Stock Plan  Account of each Stock Plan  Participant  shall be
          credited as of each Accounting Date with Plan Units equal to the total
          cash value of fees  earned in a quarter  divided by 85% of the average
          of the high and low  prices of the stock on the first  trading  day of
          the year the  election is in effect  ("Initial  Market  Value").  Plan
          Units  will be  credited  to the  director's  account  as of the first
          business day of the fiscal  quarter  following  the fiscal  quarter in
          which such Stock Plan Fees were earned. The quarterly crediting of the
          Plan Units has been established for administrative  convenience. As of
          the date of any  payment  of a stock  dividend  or stock  split by the
          Company, a participant's Stock Plan Account will be credited with Plan
          Units  equal to the  number  of  shares  of  Common  Stock  (including
          fractional share  entitlements)  which are payable by the Company with
          respect  to  the  number  of  shares   (including   fractional   share
          entitlements)  equal  to the  number  of Plan  Units  credited  to the
          Participant's  Stock Plan  Account  on the record  date for such stock
          dividend  or stock  split.  As of the date of any  dividend in cash or
          property or other distribution payable to holders of Common Stock, the
          Participant's  Stock Plan Account  shall be credited  with  additional
          Plan units  equal to the number of shares of Common  Stock  (including
          fractional share  entitlements)  that could have been purchased at the
          Fair Market  Value as of such payment date with the amount which would
          have been  received  as a dividend  or  distribution  on the number of
          shares  (including  fractional share  entitlements)  equal to the Plan
          Units  credited  to the  Participant's  Stock  Plan  Account as of the
          record date."

2. This Amendment shall be effective as of December 15, 2005.

3. Except as specifically  provided herein,  the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,455-01

EX PARTE JAMES WESLEY DUEITT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 07-03-02301-CR(1) IN THE 359TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam. HERVEY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which KELLER, P.J., and 

KEASLER, J., joined.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to three counts of

possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment on each count. 

He did not appeal his convictions.

In a single ground, Applicant contends that his due process rights were violated because

Jonathan Salvador, a former laboratory technician who engaged in misconduct and falsified test

results, analyzed the controlled substances in his cases. The trial court made findings of fact and
2

conclusions of law and recommended that we deny relief. We believe that the record is not sufficient

to resolve Applicant’s claim. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Coty, 418

S.W.3d 597, 605–06 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte Barnaby, 475 S.W.3d 316, 327 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2015); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the 

controlled substances in Applicant’s cases are available for retesting. The trial court shall also make

any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the

disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: May 25, 2016

Do not publish
Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 3 of 3