alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GUI NEW, YORK.

World Financial Center
One North End Avenue, 13» Floor
New York, New York 10282

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

05-41
September 21, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

2
fal
“Oo
nN
=
~

IWIUYLN37S BY 9”

Re: Amendments to Rule 6.17 -
Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act and Regulation 40.6

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Section Sc(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and
Commission Regulation 40.4, the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. (the
“Exchange’) submits, by written certification, amendments to Rule 6.17, attached as Exhibit A.

Rule 6.17 concerns the speculative position limit for Cocoa futures and options contracts.
The amendments raise the spot month position limit from 750 to 1,000 contracts. Regulation
150.5(c)(1) states that “[flor physical delivery contracts, the spot month limit level must be no
greater than one-quarter of the estimated spot month deliverable supply, calculated separately for
each month to be listed, ... .” Attached as Exhibit B is a table showing the number of bags of
cocoa in Exchange licensed stores. The number is expressed in Cocoa contract units. Using the
guidelines, the table justifies a spot month position limit of 1,000 contracts.

The Exchange certifies that the amendments comply with the requirements of the
Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The amendments were adopted by the Exchange’s Board of Governors on September 14,
2005. They will become effective on the first non-spot futures contract month that has open
interest that is less than 5% of the total futures open interest as of September 21, 2005, i.e., May
2007. Opposition was expressed concerning the delivery month for which the amendments
would be made effective. Although in favor of raising the spot month limit, those opposing the


-2-

implementation plan expressed the view that it should only go into effect for a delivery month
with no open interest as it may affect the value of the delivery months already listed for trading.

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at

jfassler@nybot.com or 212-748-4084.

Sincerely,

Jill S. Fassler
Vice President
Associate General Counsel

ce: Riva Adriance
Thomas Leahy
CFTC, Division of Market Oversight
Allen Cooper
CFTC, New York Regional Office


(In the text of the amendments below, additions are underlined and deletions are bracketed and
lined out.)

Rule 6.17. Position Limits and Position Accountability for Cocoa Contracts

(b) Subject to the exceptions contained in this Chapter, the maximum net long or net short position
which any one (1) Person may own or control in the Cocoa Contract is [seven-hundred-fifty{750)] one

thousand (1,000) Exchange Futures Contracts for any month for which delivery notices have or may be
issued.

EXHIBIT A
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 6/3/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD DEE THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. GEORGE VAUGHN, DON BELL, RAY DALLING, and RON HUNT, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-4187 (D.C. No. 93-CV-925-B) (D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ** Mr. Thomas, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights complaint. When he filed his complaint, Mr. Thomas also sought service of process and appointment of counsel. Almost two years later, the district court issued an order to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the meantime, it appears that Mr. Thomas had changed correctional facilities and did not- 2 -

respond to the show cause order. The district court dismissed the action pursuant to a local rule which allows for dismissal when a timely showing of good cause is not made. D. Utah R. 115; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Given that Mr. Thomas had filed his complaint and two motions, it appears that the next move to advance the case belonged to the district court. Although we review a dismissal for failure to prosecute under an abuse of discretion standard, given the circumstances we feel that the judicial process would be better served by a disposition on the merits. See DeBardeleben v. Quinlan , 937 F.2d 502, 504-05 (10th Cir. 1991). REVERSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-9 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 13 of 13
(84 South. 924)

#### ILLINOIS CENT. R. CO. v. DODD.

(6 Div. 916.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 27, 1919.)

Appeal'from Circuit Court, Winston County,; J. J. Curtis, Judge.

W. C. Davis, of Jasper, and Percy, Benners & Burr, of Birmingham, for appellant.

R. L. Blanton, of Jasper, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0254 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0254

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adoption of a Council regulation on amending Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (9817/2005 - C6-0192/2005 - 2005/0064(SYN)) **

*
Official Journal 133 E , 08/06/2006 P. 0104 - 0105 *

P6_TA(2005)0254

Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies **II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adoption of a Council regulation on amending Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (9817/2005 — C6-0192/2005 — 2005/0064(SYN))

(Cooperation procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (9817/2005 — C6-0192/2005),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to the Council (COM (2005)0154) [2],

- having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 252 and Article 99(5) of the EC Treaty (C6-0192/2005),

- having regard to Rule 60 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0204/2005),

1. Approves the common position;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] P6_TA(2005)0231.

[2] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-05991 and 333-05989) pertaining to the 1996 Non-Employee
Directors' Stock Purchase Plan and the 1996 Employee Incentive Stock Option
Plan, respectively, of McM Corporation of our report dated February 26, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the financial
statement and schedules included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of McM
Corporation and subsidiaries.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
March 29, 1999


                                       97
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Lance Friedman, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

| (1) 
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Osler Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations    of Osler Inc.
Dated: November 19, 2008 

 
     /s/ Lance Friedman Lance Friedman  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director     (Principal Executive Officer, Principal    Financial Officer  and Principal Accounting Officer)  Osler Inc. 
 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OslerInc. and will be retained by Osler Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05725-NRB Document 3 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.



Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. '1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/    NEIL J. HENNESSY                                
|Neil J. Hennessy, Chief Executive Officer and President
|Hennessy Advisors Inc.                                 



Date:
December 6, 2005
Clear All

        22 February 2023    

                    USS Farragut (DDG 99) Arrives in the 4th Fleet AOR                 
                CARIBBEAN SEA - The Arleigh-Burke class guided-missile destroyer USS Farragut (DDG 99) arrived in the U.S. 4th Fleet area of operations for a scheduled deployment, Feb. 15. Embarked with the ship is U.S. Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachment (LEDET) 406 to conduct counter narcotic operations            

        29 September 2022    

                    USS Delbert D. Black Seizes $10 Million in Drugs in Gulf of Oman                 
                MANAMA, Bahrain - A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer seized 7,200 kilograms of hashish worth an estimated $10 million from a fishing vessel transiting international waters in the Gulf of Oman, Sept. 28.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Antonio HENRIQUEZ-CHICAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-41128

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Antonio Henriquez-Chicas (Henriquez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Henriquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 26 – Satellite Constellations      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn about satellite constellations and how they work to improve our understanding of Earth.

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

Download and Transcript Access

**Summary**: Between them, Landsats 7 and 8 image the entire land surface of Earth every eight days. The USGS orbiters are just two of many Earth observing satellites flying at the same altitude and collecting data at the same time of day. Other “constellations” of satellites gather other kinds of data, traveling one after the other like cars on a train to collect information that can be used independently or combined to produce models that help us understand the health and well-being of the planet. In this episode of Eyes on Earth, we learn about those satellites, the value they provide, and how their operators work together to insure the smooth and safe collection of scientific information.

**Guests**: Jim Lacasse, USGS

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: June 1, 2020

**More on Landsat and satellite constellations**: 
                            - USGS Hosting Constellation Mission Operations Working Group in Sioux Falls
                            - USGS Landsat Missions
                            - NASA Earth Observing System

### Contacts
First Amendement to Contract, dated July 14,2004


 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Reference is made to the Agreement (the “Agreement”) made as of the 14th day of July, 2004 between Tommy Hilfiger 485 Fifth, Inc. (“Seller”) and Park & 5th Property, LLC (“Purchaser”) with respect to the purchase of premises located at 485 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York (the “Premises”).

  
 The following shall serve to amend and supplement the
Agreement: 
  
 1. The numbering of subsections in Section 6
is amended so that the second reference to subsection (b) is deemed to refer to subsection (d) and the second reference to subsection (c) is deemed to refer to subsection (e). 
  
 2. Section 26(l) is deemed amended so as to add the following in the
first line after the word “licenses”,: “(except for the licenses listed per Schedule C-1 attached hereto)”. 
  
 3. The second paragraph of Section 26(m) is amended so as to in the fifth and sixth line thereof delete the words “within thirty (30) days
of the end of the Due Diligence Period” 
  
 Dated: May 10, 2005

  

			
	 TOMMY HILFIGER 485 FIFTH, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Steven R. Gursky

	 	 	 Steven R. Gursky, Secretary

	
	 PARK & 5TH PROPERTY, LLC

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Hymie Mamiye

	 Name:
	 	 Hymie Mamiye

	 Title:
	 	 Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains  unaudited summary financial  information  extracted from
Evans & Sutherland's 1995 annual consolidated financial statements. The schedule
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0000276283
<NAME>                           EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-29-1995
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                         5,023
<SECURITIES>                                  86,718
<RECEIVABLES>                                 25,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                   18,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             161,004
<PP&E>                                       106,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                65,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               211,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         42,593
<BONDS>                                       18,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1,743
<OTHER-SE>                                   146,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 211,002
<SALES>                                      113,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             113,194
<CGS>                                         62,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 62,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              50,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               33,580
<INCOME-TAX>                                  13,096
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           20,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  327
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  20,811
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   2.41<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   2.37<F1>
        

<FN>
F1 - Restated to reflect the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting 
Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share."
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-11 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 16 of 16