alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-136910 and333-126119 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-133867, 333-131037, 333-125892 and 333-119409 on Form S-8 ofour report dated March 16, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Standards (“SFAS”) No.123(R) , *Share-Based Payment*), relating to the financial statements of Critical Therapeutics Inc.and our report dated March 16, 2007 relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CriticalTherapeutics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 57 – Landsat and the Great Lakes      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn how Landsat can help monitor the health of the Great Lakes

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: The Great Lakes represent roughly 20% of the surface freshwater in the world and 90% in the United States. The Great Lakes Basin supports more than 30 million people in the U.S. and Canada and 3,500 plant and animal species. The region faces threats that range from climate change and invasive species to pollution and development. Identifying and addressing those threats can be a daunting task, but for this episode of Eyes on Earth, we hear an example of how Landsat is helping address some of the restoration challenges.

**Guests:** Dr. Bob Shuchman, co-director and research professor at Michigan Tech Research Institute, and Dr. Mike Sayers, a research scientist at MTRI

**Host:** Jane Lawson

**Producer:** John Hult

**Release date:** August 23, 2021

**More on how Landsat helps address lake issues:**
                            - Examples of How Landsat Supports Great Lakes Restoration
                            - Global Study Finds Algal Blooms Intensifying in Freshwater Lakes Worldwide
                            - Users Realize Significant Economic, Society Benefits of Landsat

### Contacts

#### Timothy A. Glynn

##### Chief of Staff

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

tglynn@usgs.gov

605-594-6046
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 9 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 9 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 9 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 9 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of the Principal Executive Officer


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Don M. Gibson, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-  15(e)  and 15d-  15(e)  ) for the registrant and we have:





a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures  , or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) [Reserved  not effective]





c)   Evaluated  the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures  and  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures  , as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report  based on  such  evaluation  ;  and





d) Disclosed in this report any change tin the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation  of internal control over financial reporting  , to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)  All  significant deficiencies  and material weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control over financial reporting  which  are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial  information  ; and





b)  Any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal  control over financial reporting.








Date: November 6, 2003


/s/ Don M. Gibson


Don M. Gibson  President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Public Meeting on an Overview of Activities Related to the 
Potential High-Level Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, NV

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting in Mesquite, Nevada.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff will hold a 
public meeting on the high-level waste repository licensing process. 
The meeting is intended to foster a common understanding among the 
stakeholders on issues that would be associated with the licensing 
process, should the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submit a license 
application to the NRC for a possible geologic repository at Yucca 
Mountain, Nevada. All meetings will be facilitated by Francis X. 
Cameron, Special Counsel for Public Liaison, of the NRC Office of the 
General Counsel.
    The meeting is primarily to acquaint the public with the NRC's 
high-level waste licensing process. It will begin with an overview of 
the licensing process, followed by NRC presentations on the role of the 
NRC technical staff in evaluating the DOE license application, and the 
NRC role with respect to the transportation of high-level waste. An 
opportunity for questions will be provided. In addition, members of the 
NRC staff will be available for informal discussion with members of the 
public. The time, date, and location of the Public Meeting is shown 
below.
    Time/Date: Thursday, May 24, 2001, from 5:30 p.m.-7 p.m. (Pacific 
time).
    Place: Mesquite City Hall, Council Chamber, 10 E. Mesquite 
Boulevard, Mesquite, Nevada.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francis X. Cameron, Special Counsel 
for Public Liaison, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, or by telephone: (301) 
415-1642 or e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfb9a7bc9fb1adbcf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f69776c4f617d6c21686079">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 8th day of May, 2001.
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Newton K. Stablein,
Acting Chief, High-Level Waste and Performance Assessment Branch, 
Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 01-12037 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 20 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 20 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
# Peace Officers Memorial Day and Police Week, 2001

Each day, law enforcement officers encounter grave risk to protect the rights and freedoms we enjoy as Americans. Their commitment and sacrifice make our streets safer, our neighborhoods stronger, and our families more secure. Police Week provides an opportunity to recognize the selfless dedication of the brave men and women who devote their lives to protecting and serving our communities.

This Nation owes a considerable debt of gratitude to all law enforcement officers who protect the lives and property of their fellow Americans. From patrolling our highways, to investigating crime, to protecting victims' rights, these committed professionals make a valuable difference in our communities. We look to them to uphold the principle that no one is beyond the protection or reach of the law. These men and women, through their patriotic service and dedicated effort, have earned our gratitude and respect.

We pause during Police Week, and in particular on Peace Officers Memorial Day, to honor those officers who made the ultimate sacrifice while performing their sworn duty. I urge all Americans to use this occasion to pay tribute to these fallen heroes by recalling their devotion, celebrating their lives, and honoring their service.

Tragically, making America safer often requires great sacrifice. According to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, 150 law enforcement officers lost their lives in the line of duty in 2000. Although we can never repay the debt we owe these valiant officers and their families, we pay tribute to their memory by committing ourselves to being law-abiding citizens, working to lower crime in our communities, and investing time and love in our Nation's young people.

By a joint resolution approved October 1, 1962 (76 Stat. 676), the Congress has authorized and requested the President to designate May 15 of each year as “Peace Officers Memorial Day” and the week in which it falls as “Police Week,” and, by Public Law 103-322 (36 U.S.C. 136), has directed that the flag be flown at half-staff on Peace Officers Memorial Day.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 15, 2001, as Peace Officers Memorial Day and May 13 through May 19, 2001, as Police Week. I call upon all the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. I also call upon Governors of the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, as well as appropriate officials of all units of government, to direct that the flag be flown at half-staff on Peace Officers Memorial Day. I also encourage all Americans to display the flag at half-staff from their homes on that day.                          ( print page 24044)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 01-12078

Billing code 3195-01-P
oO
Foe
oOo 3
$ ie]
o

September 21, 2005

BY EMAIL AND FACSIMILE 8
Office of the Secretariat . =
Commodity Futures Trading Commission =
Three Lafayette Centre cl a
1155 21st Street, N.W. Bow
Washington, D.C. 20581 z

Re: NYMEX Submission 05.168: Notification of Change in Listing of Contract

Months for the NYMEX NOX Emissions Allowance Futures Contract

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of a change in the listing schedule
for contract months on the NYMEX NOX Emissions Allowance Futures Contract. The contract month
of December will be delisted with the launch of the NYMEX Banked NOX Emissions Allowance

Futures Contract. This month is currently listed for the years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. There is no
open interest in these contract months.

The Exchange is delisting the December contract month as it becomes redundant with the listing
of the Banked Contracts. The NYMEX NOX Emissions Allowance Futures Contract specifies that the
current year vintage is deliverable while the Banked Contract specifies that the deliverable vintages are
those for “which the compliance year trading deadline has passed”. That deadline passes at the end of

November, therefore the current year vintage would be deliverable into the December contract month of
both contracts.

This change in contract month listing will go into effect with the launch the NYMEX Banked

NOX Emissions Allowance Futures Contract on NYMEX Trade Date, September 26, 2005 per Exchange
Submission 05.166.

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the
Exchange hereby certifies that this change in listing schedule complies with the Act, including
regulations under the Act..

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Jay Gottlieb, Director,
Research, at (212) 299-2607; or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2390.

Very truly yours,

Robert A. Levin
Senior Vice President, Research
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 23 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 23 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, James C. Eckert, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 29, 2007



/s/ James C. EckertJames C. EckertChief Executive Officer
#                                                                         Standing NATO Maritime Group 2 Strengthens Ties in Montenegro                                                                    

##### by Cmdr. Fernando Estrella, NATO Allied Maritime Command

02 February 2023
                SNMG2 visited Bar, Montenegro and engaged with military and civilian distinguished visitors. The visit concluded with a reception hosted aboard the flagship, USS James E Williams (DDG 95).                            230127-N-DH616-0002                            SNMG2 visited Bar, Montenegro and engaged with military and civilian distinguished visitors. The visit concluded with a reception hosted aboard the flagship, USS James E Williams (DDG 95).            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Petty Officer 2nd Class Ezekiel DuranVIRIN: 230127-N-DH616-0002BAR, Montenegro - Standing NATO Maritime Group Two (SNMG2) concluded a port visit in Bar on Jan. 28.SNMG2 entered the Port of Bar on Jan. 24 with its flagship, U.S. Navy destroyer USS James E. Williams (DDG 95), and Turkish Navy frigate TCG Barbaros (F 244).

During the port call, Commander of SNMG2 U.S. Navy Rear Admiral Scott Sciretta visited with Acting Minister of Defense Mr. Filip Adzic, Chief of Defense General Zoran Lazarevicthe, Chief Naval Officer Commander Milan Jevtovic, Mayor of the Municipality of Bar Mr. Dusan Raicevic, and U.S. Ambassador to Montenegro Ambassador Judy Reinke. Additionally, Sciretta conducted a press availability with local media and hosted a reception with Montenegro officials aboard the flagship.

“Since becoming a member of the NATO Alliance, Montenegro has participated in key exercises with Allied partners,” Sciretta said. “Montenegro is an integral player, helping to guarantee readiness and safety within the Adriatic region. To have a member-nation that can provide this capability and ensure that Allied ships can remain at a high level of readiness provides a tremendous advantage.”

As a NATO task group, SNMG2 prioritizes its mandate to enhance the collective readiness, responsiveness, deployable readiness, integration and interoperability of its forces. Its focus is on deterrence and defense against every potential threat in the maritime domain, upholding freedom of navigation, securing maritime trade routes and protecting the main lines of communication.

SNMG2 is a multinational integrated task group that projects a constant and visible reminder of the Alliance's solidarity and cohesion afloat. This continuous maritime capability performs a wide range of tasks, including exercises and real-world operations in periods of crisis and conflict.

SNMG2 is one of four Standing Naval Forces that operate under NATO Allied Maritime Command, headquartered in Northwood, United Kingdom.

For more news and information on SNMG2, visit https://mc.nato.int/SNMG2 or follow us at:www.facebook.com/StandingNATOMaritimeGroup2www.twitter.com/COM_SNMG2www.instagram.com/snmg_two.

Tags:
**USS James E. Williams**NATO**SNMG 2**montenegro

Terms:
**Partnerships**Navy Headlines
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent, V. LONNIE RAY CARTER,

Appellant. No.75414-9-1 DIVISION ONE
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: February 20,2018
PER CURIAM. Lonnie Ray Carter appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to third degree theft and possession of heroin. Carter's counsel on appeal contends,and the State concedes,that the no-contact provision regarding Macy's on the possession count is not crime-related. Counsel also contends,and the State concedes,that the judgment and sentence for possession of heroin contains a scrivener's error in its statutory citation. We acceptthe State's concessions and remand with instructions to amend the judgment and sentence consistent with this opinion. In a Statement ofAdditional Grounds,1 Carter contends his counsel "labored under an actual conflict of interest." SAG at 1. He contends the conflict

1 Carter filed the same Statement ofAdditional Grounds(SAG)in this appeal and appeal No.75413-1.The appeals are taken from a single plea and sentencing hearing encompassing two sets ofconvictions. Because the same attorney represented Carter on all of the matters before the court in those hearings,and because the SAGs allege that counsel had a conflict of interest, we address the SAG in both appeals.No;

75414-9-1/2 resulted in a sentence thatfailed to provide him sufficient security from alleged contracts for his murder. He alleges his trial counsel knew he wanted a sentence that could be served in protective custody because he "is a 'Target'for 'Murder" "[f]or being a 'Government Informant [.]" SAG (9/28/17)at 2. He claims counsel failed to inform him that a Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA)could not be served in the Intensive Management Unit or otherforms of protective custody. He concludes that conflict-free counsel would have obtained a sentence providing the protection he sought. Carter's claim involves matters largely outside the record and is therefore reviewable only in a personal restraint petition. State v. McFarland, 127Wn.2d 322, 338,899 P.2d 1251 (1995).The record contains no declarations regarding his alleged conversations with counsel. Nor does his quotation from the plea hearing reveal the nature ofany discussions with counsel. Carter did file a motion to discharge counsel the day before sentencing,but that motion involved counsel's pretrial conduct,not his conductatsentencing,and is based in part on matters outside this court's record. Carter also contends his trial counsel and the prosecutor violated his Eighth Amendment rights because they acted "with 'deliberate indifference'and a disregard of Pre-trial Detainee Carter's serious safety concerns [J"SAG at 2. This claim also involves matters outside the record,appears to be moot,and in any event is too conclusory to merit review under RAP 10.10(c).

2' No.75414-9-1/3 Affirmed in part and remanded in partfor amendment ofthe judgment and sentence.

For the Court:

3
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 58      Filed 04/04/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 58      Filed 04/04/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 58      Filed 04/04/2008     Page 3 of 3