alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

A LOUISIANA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, G. Darcy Klug, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OMNI Energy Services Corp., a Louisiana corporation (the registrant);

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2006                               
|                                                 
|/s/ G. Darcy Klug                                
|G. Darcy Klug Interim Principal Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Summit Brokerage
Services, Inc. (the Company), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steven C. Jacobs, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my
knowledge that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                                                                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Steven C. Jacobs

Steven C. Jacobs
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

Dated: August 14, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Summit Brokerage Services, Inc. and will be retained by Summit
Brokerage Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

21
YYZ PH AZ 36

June 17, 200:
Via Electronic Mail OFC. OF THE SECRETARIAT
Ms. Jean A. Webb
Secretary
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC Rule Certification
Submission Number CFE-2005-18

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Section Se(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended ("Act"), and
§40.6(a) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under
the Act, CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC ("CFE” or "Exchange") hereby submits an amendment to
its rules relating to the Mini-Russell 2000 Index futures contract to change the execution
allocation method for that contract ("Amendment"). Currently, a CFE Trading Privilege Holder
acts as a DPM for the Mini-Russell 2000 Index futures contract and the execution allocation
method for the contract is price-time priority with a DPM trade participation right priority
overlay. Pursuant to the Amendment, the Mini-Russell 2000 Index futures contract will be traded
without a DPM solely using the price-time priority execution allocation method (and no DPM
trade participation right priority overlay). The Amendment will become effective on June 20,
2005.

CFE is not aware of any substantive opposing views to the Amendment. CFE hereby
certifies that the Amendment complies with the Act and the regulations thereunder.

The Amendment, marked to show additions in underlined text and deletions in
[bracketed] text, consists of the following:

kee EE
Rule 1502. Contract Specifications

(a)-@® No change.

(g) Execution Priorities. Pursuant to Rule 406(a)(i), the base allocation
method of price-time priority shall apply to trading in Mini-Russell 2000 Index futures
contracts. [Pursuant to Rule 406(b){iii), a DPM trade participation right priority shall
overlay the price-time priority base allocation method.]

(h) - (m) No change.

keke

400 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60605-1023 www.cboe.com/cfe


Ms. Jean A. Webb
Page 2 of 2

[Rule 1504. DPM Provisions

(a) DPM Appointment. A Trading Privilege Holder will be appointed to act
as a DPM for the Mini-Russell 2000 Index futures contract pursuant to Rule 515.

(b) DPM Participation Right. The DPM participation right percentage under
Rule 406(b)(iii) for the Mini-Russell 2000 Index futures contract is 30%.]

Raa EE

Questions regarding this submission may be directed to David Doherty at (312) 786-
7466. Please reference our submission number CFE-2005-18 in any related correspondence.

CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC

By: F dvse S2—-

Edward J. Joyce
President

ce: Mark Baumgardner (OCC)
#### In the Matter of Judy C. Chase, Appellant, v Donald C. Chase, Respondent.

Appeals (1) from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Ray, J.), entered June 17, 1986, which, *inter alia,*dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, for modification of a prior custody decree, and (2) from an order of said court, entered August 6, 1986, which, *inter alia,*directed petitioner to pay child support.

*984We agree with the reasoning of Family Court as found in its written decisions. We add only that respondent’s request for counsel fees is denied. In the absence of any request before Family Court or a cross appeal, respondent inappropriately raises this issue for the first time before us *(see, e.g., Matter of Van Alstyne v David Q.,*92 AD2d 971, 972).

Orders affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Clear All

        02 March 2023    

                    USS Porter (DDG 78) arrives in Rostock, Germany                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) arrived in Rostock, Germany for a scheduled port visit, March 2, 2023.            

        17 June 2022    

                    BALTOPS 22, the premier Baltic Sea maritime exercise, concludes in Kiel                 
                KIEL, Germany - Sixteen NATO Allied and partner nations concluded the 51st iteration of Baltic Operations 2022 (BALTOPS22) in Kiel, Germany, June 17, 2022.            

        11 June 2022    

                    USS Porter embarks German Navy Chaplain during BALTOPS 22                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) embarked a German Navy chaplain as part of exercise Baltic Operations (BALTOPS22) in the Baltic Sea, June 6, 2022.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 49 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 49 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 49 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rolando Eulalio GUERRA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-50039

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 2013.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Shannon Charles Hooks, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Rolando Eulalio Guerra, Forrest City, AR, pro se.

Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Rolando Eulalio Guerra has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Guerra has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7032

ROBERT R. JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-1201-2)

Submitted: June 23, 2004 Decided: July 6, 2004

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert R. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth M. McKeaney, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert R. Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion to reopen the time to note an appeal from the

court’s prior order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254

proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability is required to appeal the district court’s order

denying Jones’ post-judgment motion. See Reid v. Angelone, No. 03-

6146, slip op. at 7 (4th Cir. May 19, 2004). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Jones’ motion

for transfer to another facility. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
- 3 -

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1


                              Accountant's Consent



The Board of Directors
Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements Nos.
33-39632,  2-76027,  333-53305,   333-58735  and  333-58733  on  Forms  S-8  and
Registration  Statements  Nos.  333-09657  and 333-67189 on Forms S-3 of Evans &
Sutherland Computer Corporation of our report dated February 14, 2000, except as
to Note 24, which is as of March 28, 2000 relating to the  consolidated  balance
sheets  of  Evans &  Sutherland  Computer  Corporation  and  subsidiaries  as of
December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements
of operations,  comprehensive  income,  stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the  three-year  period ended December 31, 1999 and related
schedule,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1999 Annual  Report on Form
10-K of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation.





                                        KPMG LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
March 30, 2000
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-4 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-4 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-4 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-4 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 4 of 4
#                                                                         HSM-79 Establishes New Spain Detachment, CNAL Presides                                                                    

##### by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Petty Officer D.S. Randol

17 June 2022NAVAL STATION ROTA, Spain -- 

            SLIDESHOW | 3 images | HSM-79 Establishment Ceremony                    ROTA, Spain.-- Rear Adm. John F. Meier, Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic, stands with Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 79 leadership at the establishment ceremony for HSM-79 detachment, Rota, Spain, June 16, 2022. Meier attended the ceremony along with Cmdr. Brett Elko, the commanding officer of HSM-79, and Cmdr. Nikolas Rongers, HSM-79’s executive officer. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Nathan Carpenter)        

                    HSM-79 Establishment Ceremony                                            1 of 3                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    HSM-79 Establishment Ceremony                                            2 of 3                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    HSM-79 Establishment Ceremony                                            3 of 3                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

Tags:
**Rota**hsm-79**CNAL**Establishment Ceremony**helicopter maritime strike squadron (HSM) 79**Spain**Naval Air Force Atlantic**Naval Station Rota**Forward Deployed Naval Forces-Europe
A92A1955.

#### HAGEMAN v. THE STATE.

(423 SE2d 56)

Decided September 29, 1992.

*Douglas R. Daum,*for appellant.

*Ralph T. Bowden, Jr., Solicitor, Cassandra J. Cook, R. Javoyne*
      *645
      *Hill, W. Cliff Howard, Assistant Solicitors,*for appellee.

*644McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Hageman appeals his conviction of the offense of speeding. *Held:*

Each of defendant’s three enumerations of error contend the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence at trial. However, defendant has failed to comply with OCGA § 5-6-37 by stating in the notice of appeal whether any transcript of evidence is to be transmitted to this Court as part of the record on appeal and there is no transcript of the trial included in the record on appeal. “ ‘In the absence of a transcript, we cannot consider enumerations of error concerning the evidence or proceedings at trial. *Dean v. State,*188 Ga. App. 128 (372 SE2d 286) (1988).’ *Hasty v. State,*195 Ga. App. 427 (394 SE2d 800).” *Williams v. State,*200 Ga. App. 84, 85 (1) (406 SE2d 498). “In the absence of a transcript, or a record prepared from recollection or a stipulation of the case pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-41 (g, i), we cannot consider enumerations of error based on the evidence. *Dean v. State,*188 Ga. App. 128 (372 SE2d 286) (1988).” *Sizemore v. State,*195 Ga. App. 548 (395 SE2d 669). See also *Powell v. State,*198 Ga. App. 509, 512 (2) (402 SE2d 108), and *Sheriff v. State,*184 Ga. App. 180 (361 SE2d 53). Since defendant’s enumerations can be reviewed only by reference to a transcript, the absence of a transcript requires that we assume that the trial court’s rulings on the admission of evidence were correct.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Sognier, C. J., and Cooper, J., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11288]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems (1189).
    Date/Time: May 30-31, 2001; 8:00 am-5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Fred G. Heineken, Program Director, Division of 
Bioengineering and Environmental Systems, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 
(703) 292-7944.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-11288 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
METHFESSEL & WERBEL, ESQS. 

450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1400 

New York, NY 10123 

(212) 947-1999 

Attorneys for BMS Catastrophe, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

FREDDY CONFORME, 

Plaintiff, 

-AGAINST160 WATER ST., INC., 160 WATER 

STREET ASSOCIATES, 60 HUDSON 

OWNER LLC, ALAN KASMAN DBA 

KASCO, ANN TAYLOR STORES 

CORPORATION, BATTERY PARK 

CITY AUTHORITY, BLACKMONMOORING STEAMATIC 

CATASTOPHE, INC. D/B/A BMS 

CAT, et.al. 

Defendants. 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

INDEX NO.: 07 CV 5552 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant, BMS Catastrophe, Inc. s/h/a 

Blackmon-Mooring-Steamatic Catastophe, Inc. d/b/a BMS Catastrophe, by 

their attorneys, Methfessel & Werbel, as and for their response to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) 

Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby 

adopts their Answer and defenses to the Master Complaint, dated July 26, 

2007, which was filed in the matter of: In Re World Trade Center Lower 

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

 To the extent that Defendant’s Answer to the Master Complaint does not 

comprehensively address any of the specific allegations within the Check-Off 

Complaint in the above captioned matter, Defendant, Defendant, BMS 

Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 11 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 3
Catastrophe, Inc., denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as 

to the truth of such specific allegations. 

 WHEREFORE, the defendant, Defendant, BMS Catastrophe, Inc., 

demands judgment dismissing the above captioned action as against them, 

together with costs, disbursements and such other and further relief as this 

Court deems just and proper. 

DATED: New York, New York 

 December 17, 2007 

METHFESSEL & WERBEL, ESQS. 

Attorneys for Blackmon-MooringSteamatic Catastophe, Inc. d/b/a BMS 

Catastrophe 

By:________________________________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 11 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 

The undersigned hereby certifies as follows: 

 l. I am employed by the law firm of Methfessel & Werbel. 

 2. On December 17, 2007 the undersigned prepared and 

forwarded copies of the the undersigned prepared and forwarded copies 

of the within Notice of Adoption , via ECF, to the following parties: 

 William J. Dubanevich, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP 

5 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, NY 10006 

Attorneys for: Plaintiff 

All Defense Counsel 

 3. I certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am 

aware that if any of the foregoing statements made by me are wilfully false, I am 

subject to punishment. 

 

____________________________________ 

Frank J. Keenan 

Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 11 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 3 of 3