alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act





     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC.
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an
officer of Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") and in connection with the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2010 ("Report"), that:

 *  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)  and
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
 *  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial
     statements included in the Report.



/s/Michael R. Sand                             /s/Dean J. Brydon
------------------------------               -------------------------
Michael R. Sand                              Dean J. Brydon
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 6, 2010

                                      54

<PAGE>
DENIED and Opinion Filed November 16 , 2015 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01292
- CV IN RE GIANT EAGLE, I NC. , Relator Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 15
- 03853 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges, and Justice Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Stoddart Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requestin g that the Court order the trial court to dismiss the claims asserted against relator without prejudice to the right of real party in interest Dickson Perry, derivatively on behalf of Excentus Corporation, to refile those claims in Allegheny County, Pennsy lvania. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceed ing). We conclude relator has failed to establish a right to relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

151292F.P05 /Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 26843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: June 4-5, 2001.
    Time of Meeting: 0830-1545, June 4, 2001; 0830-1545 June 5, 2001
    Place: Presidential Towers, Arlington, VA, 9th Floor conference 
room.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's (ASB) panel will conduct an Ad 
Hoc Study on ``Adapting Future Wireless Communication'' to examine 
future commercial wireless capabilities and recommend which 
capabilities may have applicability for the Objective Force. The 
meetings will be open to the public. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the 
time and in the manner permitted by the committee. For further 
information, please contact Mr. Jeff Ozimek, Army Science Board 
Staff Assistant, 732-532-5496 or Ms. Lisa Calabrese, Army Science 
Board Staff Assistant Assistant, 732-427-4646.

Wayne Joyner,
Executive Assistant, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 01-12201 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Clear All

        12 September 2022    

                    NATO Exercise Dynamic Mariner/Mavi Balina 22 begins in Mediterranean                 
                AKSAZ, Türkiye - NATO’s Exercise Dynamic Mariner-Mavi Balina 22 kicked off from Aksaz Naval Base Sept. 11.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# C_2009216EN.01002302.xml

| 10.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/23

---

Corrigendum to the authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 212 of 5 September 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 212 of 5 September 2009

2009/C 216/11

On page 15, under ‘Reference number of State Aid’:

for:

‘N 604/09’,

read:

‘N 604/08.’

---
143 So. 923

#### Joe BROWN v. STATE.

7 Div. 149.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 13, 1932.

Cockrell & Riddle, of Talladega, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., opposed.

THOMAS, J.

Petition of Joe Brown for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Brown v. State, 143 So. 925.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG Document 23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG Document 23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG Document 23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG Document 23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG Document 23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG Document 23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 6
#### LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. IRWIN.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 9, 1913.)

No. 2,500.

Railroads (§ 345*)—Action for Injury at Crossing—Evidence—Rate of Speed.

Under an allegation, in the complaint in an action against a railroad company to recover for the death of a person killed at a crossing, that the train was being run wantonly and recklessly at a high rate of speed, a municipal ordinance regulating the speed of trains is admissible.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Railroads, Cent. Dig. §§ 1113-1110; Dec. Dig. § 345.*]

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama; Harry T. Toulmin, Judge.

Action at law by Ella R. Irwin, administratrix of J. S. Irwin, deceased, against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

Gregory L. Smith, of Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff in error.

R. T. Ervin, of Mobile, Ala., for defendant in error.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The speed ordinance of the town of Bay Minette was admissible in evidence under the counts in the complaint which charged that the engineer at the time of the accident was wantonly and recklessly running his engine over a crossing at a high rate of speed.

In other rulings of the court we find no reversible error,

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-391-000]

Take notice that on April 30, 3001, Discovery Gas Transmission LLC (Discovery) filed with the Commission its annual cash-out report for the calendar year ended December 31, 2000.

Discovery states that the cash-out report reflects a net gain for this period of $464,639.46. The cumulative gain from cash-out transactions is $165,959.11. This net gain, which is less than $400,000.00, will be carried forward to the subsequent reporting period.

Discovery states that copies of this filing are being mailed to its customers, state commissions and other interested parties.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before May 14, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene.  Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 2020-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11784 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

| Date:      | November      23, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Signature: | /s/      Harris A. Lichtenstein,      Ph.D.                                                           |   |   |   |
|       | Name: Harris      A. Lichtenstein, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|       | Title:       President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorOmnimmune      Holdings, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
Exhibit 10.1


                 SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION
                      ARRANGEMENTS OUTSIDE OF FORMAL PLANS

                     As amended, effective December 15, 2005

ANNUAL RETAINER FEE
-------------------

On  January 1 of each  year he or she  serves on the  board,  each  non-employee
director  will  receive an annual  retainer  fee of $40,000  cash or a number of
stock units, payable in equal quarterly installments. Each non-employee director
must  irrevocably  elect by December 31 of the prior year whether to receive his
or her retainer in cash or units.

MEETING FEES AND ANNUAL STIPENDS
--------------------------------

Each  non-employee  director will receive $2,000 for his or her participation in
each regular  board and  committee  meeting.  Each  non-employee  director  will
receive  $1,000  for his or her  participation  in  each  telephonic  board  and
committee meeting.  The Chairman of the Board, each Committee Chair and the Lead
Director will receive an additional  annual stipend,  payable in equal quarterly
installments  on  the  first  business  day of the  succeeding  quarter,  in the
following amounts:

   Chairman of the Board                                       $30,000
   Lead Director                                               $15,000
   Audit Committee Chair                                       $25,000
   Compensation Committee Chair                                $15,000
   Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair          $7,500
   Retirement Plan Committee                                    $5,000

Each  non-employee  director must elect by December 31 of the prior year whether
to receive his or her meeting fees and annual stipend, when applicable,  in cash
or stock units, or a combination of the two forms of compensation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANA ELIZABETH HENRIQUEZBERNAL; ESTELA ELIZABETH 

SANTOS-AGUILERA, 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-72323 

Agency Nos. A095-734-320 

A095-734-321 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 17, 2019**

Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Ana Elizabeth Henriquez-Bernal and Estela Elizabeth Santos-Aguilera, 

natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 25 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-72323 

decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief 

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. 

Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the 

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the harm petitioners

suffered in El Salvador did not rise to the level of past persecution. See Nagoulko 

v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-17 (9th Cir. 2003) (record did not compel the finding 

that petitioner experienced past persecution). Substantial evidence also supports 

the agency’s finding that petitioners failed to establish an objectively reasonable 

fear of future persecution in El Salvador. See Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 

(9th Cir. 2001) (“[a]n applicant’s claim of persecution upon return is weakened, 

even undercut, when similarly-situated family members continue to live in the 

country without incident”). Thus, petitioners’ asylum claims fail. 

In this case, because petitioners failed to establish eligibility for asylum, they

failed to demonstrate eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d 

at 1190.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of petitioners’ CAT claim 
3 14-72323 

because they failed to establish that it is more likely than not they will be tortured 

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of El Salvador. See 

Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject petitioners’ contention that the BIA violated their due process 

rights. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to 

prevail on a due process claim).

In light of this disposition, we need not reach petitioners’ remaining 

contentions. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (“As a 

general rule courts and agencies are not required to decide issues unnecessary to 

the results they reach.”) (citation omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 70
          - [TN-T5-2001-03; FRL-6977-7]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; reopening of the public comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                        In response to a request from Mr. George Hays as counsel for the National Parks Conservation Association, EPA is reopening the comment period for a proposed rule published on March 20, 2001, in the                         **Federal Register**                         (66 FR 15680) for full approval of the operating permit programs submitted by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation and the Memphis-Shelby County Health Department.                    

# DATES:

Written comments must be received by EPA on or before June 11, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

Comments should be addressed to Ms. Kim Pierce, Regional Title V Program Manager, Air & Radiation Technology Branch, EPA Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8909.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kim Pierce, EPA Region 4, at (404) 562-9124 or                         *pierce.kim@epa.gov/.*      ( print page 24085)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    See the information provided in the direct final rule located in the final rules section and the proposed rule located in the proposed rules section of the                     **Federal Register**                     published on March 20, 2001.                

Dated: May 3, 2001.

A. Stanley Meiburg,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 01-11911 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 25 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 25 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH     Document 8      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH     Document 8      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy gives notice of its intent to grant to Wickford Technologies, Inc., a revocable, nonassignable, partially exclusive license, with exclusive fields of use in recreational marine electronics, petroleum distribution, process pipe, and aviation electronics in the United States to practice the Government-owned invention, U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 09/391,605 entitled “Differential Pressure Flow Sensor.” 

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than May 20, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with Indian Head Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code OC4, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035. 

      ( print page 23903)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. J. Scott Deiter, Head, Technology Transfer Office, Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division, Code 05T, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035, telephone (301) 744-6111. 

Dated: May 1, 2001.

C.G. Carlson, 

Major, U.S. Marine Corps, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-11820 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0394 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0394

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compensation in cases of non-compliance with contractual quality requirements for rail freight services (COM(2004)0144 - C6-0004/2004 - 2004/0050(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 272 E , 09/11/2006 P. 0173 - 0177 *

P6_TA(2005)0394

Rail freight quality requirements ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compensation in cases of non-compliance with contractual quality requirements for rail freight services (COM(2004)0144 — C6-0004/2004 — 2004/0050(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0144) [1],

- having regard to Articles 251(2) and 71(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0004/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0171/2005),

1. Rejects the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------