alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 as
Adopted Pursuant Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
  I, David
H. Bateman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of
Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Evans & Sutherland Computer
Corporation.
 
 Date:
      April 2, 2010
                By:
                /s/ David H. BatemanDavid
      H. BatemanChief
      Executive Officer
 
 I, Paul
L. Dailey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of
Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Evans & Sutherland Computer
Corporation.
 
 Date:
      April 2, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ Paul L. DaileyPaul
      L. DaileyChief
      Financial Officer
  The
foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of BuildingMaterials Holding Corporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

•      the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) [or Section 15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•      the information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 13, 2003

 

 
| /s/ Robert E. Mellor                 |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Chairman of the Board, President and |
| Chief Executive Officer              |
| (Principal Executive Officer)        |

 

----
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                AMRESCO, INC.

                EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                                                        2000            1999            1998
<S>                                                               <C>             <C>             <C>
Basic and Diluted:
 Income (loss) from continuing operations                            $314,953,000)  $(149,378,000)  $(21,744,000)
 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes       43,023,000     (71,471,000)   (47,427,000)
 Income (loss) before extraordinary gain                             (271,930,000)   (220,849,000)   (69,171,000)
 Extraordinary gain on early retirement of debt, net of income taxes   53,989,000
 Net income (loss)                                                  $(217,941,000)  $(220,849,000)  $(69,171,000)

 Weighted average common shares outstanding                             9,980,628       9,726,996      8,632,384
 Contingently issuable shares                                                                             10,945
 Restricted shares                                                       (245,600)       (151,102)       (74,086)
   Total                                                                9,735,028       9,575,894      8,569,243

 Earnings (loss) from continuing operations                               $(32.35)        $(15.60)       $(2.54)
 Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes           4.42           (7.46)        (5.53)
 Extraordinary gain on early retirement of debt, net of incometaxes          5.54
 Earnings (loss) per share                                                $(22.39)        $(23.06)       $(8.07)
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFNATURE’S SUNSHINE PRODUCTS, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Nature’sSunshine Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Douglas Faggioli, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify that, pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

 

1.               the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Douglas Faggioli                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Douglas Faggioli                       |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| March 18, 2009                    |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners

Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-74212 and 333-156732), on Form S-3 (No. 333-162118) and on Form S-4 (No. 333-170102) of Penn Virginia
Resource Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries (the Partnership) of our reports dated February 24, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements
of income, partners capital and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership.



|                  |  |             
|----------------- |  | ------------
|                  |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
|                  | 
|Houston, Texas    |  |             
|February 24, 2011 |  |
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24175-24176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration 
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain 
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is 
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory 
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the 
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

North Star Rail

[Docket Number FRA-2001-8961]

    The North Star Rail seeks a waiver of compliance with the 
Inspection and Maintenance Standards for Steam Locomotives, 49 CFR part 
230, published November 17, 1999. Section 230.3(c) of the standards 
requires steam locomotives having flue tubes replaced prior to 
September 25, 1995, have a one thousand four hundred seventy-two 
service day inspection (49 CFR 230.17) performed prior to being allowed 
to operate under the requirements. North Star Rail seeks this waiver 
for one locomotive number 261 which was built in 1944. The railroad's 
records indicate the locomotive was overhauled and had the flue tubes 
replaced in 1993. Since the overhaul the locomotive has operated under 
steam a total of 240 days. North Star Rail states that the locomotive 
is stored year round indoors in a modern shop facility.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by

[[Page 24176]]

submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings, since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2001-8961) and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central 
Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401, Washington, DC., 20590-0001. 
Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice will 
be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments received 
after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All written 
communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above 
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for 
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web 
site at 
http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC. on May 7, 2001.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 01-11953 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Brian J. Recatto, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:
September 7, 2010



/S/ BRIAN J.
RECATTOBrian J. Recatto
President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05342-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05342-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05342-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05342-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05342-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05342-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05342-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 99.1

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles N. Martin, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

            (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                      Charles N. Martin, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2003

            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
November 2, 2005 {-3 IN 35
Ms. Jean A. Webb OFC. OF THe
Secretary . s
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2594.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Temporarily terminate trading authorization in deferred month CBOT 5-
Year U.S. Treasury Note futures and options in which there is no open
interest. (Specific contract months are shown on the attached.)

The CBOT is taking this action pending the Exchange’s review of its 5-Year U.S. Treasury Note
futures contract specifications, pursuant to changes in the schedule of auctions announced on
November 2, 2005 by the U.S. Treasury Department at its November 2005 Quarterly Refunding
press briefing.

The Exchange intends to implement this action as of the business day (trade date) following the
Commission’s receipt of this filing.

There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary


CBOT

Temporary Delisting of Deferred Month
5-Year U.S. Treasury Note Contracts

5 Year Treasury Notes (futures)
June 2006

September 2006
December 2006

5 Year Treasury Notes (options)
June 2006
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 38 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 38 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 38 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
(104 So. 917)

#### W. C. GRAVES et al. v. Travis MIXON.

(4 Div. 217.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 18, 1925.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Houston County; H. A. Pearce, Judge.

Farmer, Merrill & Farmer, of Dothan, for appellants.

Espy & Hill, of Dothan, for appellee.

GARDNER, J.

The question involved is one of fact. The conclusion is reached that there is error in the decree as to the amount found due by appellants to appellee. Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6092

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ORVILLE ISAAC WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-76-BR)

Submitted: April 25, 2000 Decided: May 12, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orville Isaac Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Orville Isaac Wright appeals from the denial of his motion for

a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The district court

denied this motion because it was filed beyond the three-year limit

prescribed by Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. Wright asserts that the district court erred in calculating the deadline based on the date of

the jury’s verdict, rather than the date when he completed appellate review. Contrary to Wright’s assertions, however, Rule 33

provides that the three-year limitations period runs from “the

verdict or finding of guilt.” Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s ruling that Wright’s motion was untimely. We deny Wright’s

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Jamie Paul DESPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.J. PONTON, Warden; Mr. Rogers, Corporal; Mr. DeSaintes, a/k/a DeSaints, Correctional Officer; Ms. Evans, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees, and Mr. Gerst, Head Counselor; Ms. Sylvia Whitten, Facility Ombudsman; Ms. Anita Bryant, Regional Ombudsman; Mr. Woods, Correctional Officer; Mr. Louis Cei, Special Programs Manager, Defendants.

No. 13-6211.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Jamie Paul Desper, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.

*232Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Paul Desper appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to reconsider its order entering summary judgment against his civil rights action, which proceeded under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *See Sossamon v. Texas,*— U.S. -, 181 S.Ct. 1651, 1663, 179 L.Ed.2d 700 (2011); *Rendelman v. Rouse,*569 F.3d 182, 186, 189 (4th Cir.2009). *See also Lovelace v. Lee,*472 F.3d 174, 187 (4th Cir.2006); *In re Long Tenn Admin. Segregation of Inmates Designated, as Five Percenters,*174 F.3d 464, 468-69 (4th Cir.1999).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process

AFFIRMED.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Donald E. Walter, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for Western Louisiana, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE SANTOS MENDOZA,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

M. D. MCDONALD, Chief Deputy

Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 08-17225

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-01757-GEBGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2011** 

San Francisco, California

Before: NOONAN and BEA, Circuit Judges, and WALTER, Senior District

Judge.*** 

FILED

NOV 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Jose Santos Mendoza appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. §

2254 petition for untimeliness. He argues for both statutory and equitable tolling of

the one-year statute of limitations imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective

Death Penalty Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

Mendoza is not entitled to statutory tolling because there were such long

periods of unexplained delay between his state habeas filings that they cannot be

excused from the year-long limitations period. See Chaffer v. Prosper, 592 F.3d

1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2010).

Mendoza also is not entitled to equitable tolling because he does not provide

specific allegations showing that he made diligent efforts to pursue his federal

petition during the period between December 13, 2006, the date the California

Supreme Court denied his state habeas petition, and August 28, 2007, the date he

filed the federal habeas petition. See Roy v. Lampert, 465 F.3d 964, 969 (9th Cir.

2006). Mendoza does not explain how he was able to prepare several state filings,

despite the language barrier and other impediments, but had inadequate access to

legal materials to prepare his federal petition.

We therefore hold that Mendoza is not entitled to statutory or equitable

tolling to render his petition timely. The district court’s dismissal of Mendoza’s

petition for untimeliness is AFFIRMED.
Texas Hill Country 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2015

No. 04-15-00480-CV

LIBERTY SPORT AVIATION, L.P.,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS HILL COUNTRY BANK,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-314A

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant filed an unopposed motion to consolidate this appeal with appeal number 04-

15-00479-CV. We construe the motion as a request to proceed only in this appeal from trial 

court cause no. 14-314A. We grant the motion and retain this appeal on the docket of the court.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Report of HERITAGE-CRYSTAL CLEAN, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Chalhoub, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date: May 11, 2010
By: /s/ Joseph ChalhoubJoseph ChalhoubPresident, CEO and Director — Principal Executive

Officer