alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.


Exhibit 32.2
------------
                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350


                  Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Teresa M. Nilsen
--------------------------------
Teresa M. Nilsen, Chief Financial Officer
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Date: December 14, 2004



                                       75
Clear All

        23 January 2023    

                    SECNAV awards Navy Cross to retired Korean War veteran                  
                Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro awarded the Navy Cross to retired Navy Capt. Royce Williams for his exploits during the Korean War at a ceremony at the San Diego Air and Space Museum, Jan. 20.            

        19 January 2023    

                    Silver Star Awarded to Naval Special Warfare Legend                 
                A half-century ago, Lt. j.g. Thomas Richards, fighting through injury and exhaustion in the rice paddies of Vietnam, made repeated trips through enemy gunfire to rescue three injured SEAL Team One Zulu Platoon teammates. Nicknamed "The Hulk" for his size and strength, Richards demonstrated uncommon            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
----

|   | (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /S/      Jay M. Meilstrup    |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Jay      M. Meilstrup                  |   |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer           |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| March      6, 2009                     |   |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT ON FORM 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          2,399
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          3,919
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     7,415
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          9,571
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            9,695
<LOANS>                                       287,377
<ALLOWANCE>                                     2,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                322,604
<DEPOSITS>                                    143,196
<SHORT-TERM>                                  115,836
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,883
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          625
<OTHER-SE>                                     60,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                322,604
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                10,562
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 412
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  321
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               11,295
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              3,011
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              6,106
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           5,188
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 3,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,683
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,702
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.44
<LOANS-NON>                                     1,455
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,455
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                2,405
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       4
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,435
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            2,435
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems (1205).                    

*Date/Time:*                         Wednesday, May 30, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 530, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Jorn Larsen-Basse, Program Director, Surface Engineering and Material Design, Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd. Room 545, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8360.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY '01 Surface Engineering and Material Design Review Panel as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 8, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-11920 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                        5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-2000                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                               1,516                         1,920
<SECURITIES>                         0                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                        10,761                        9,660
<ALLOWANCES>                         492                           337
<INVENTORY>                          1,643                         2,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     13,929                        14,062
<PP&E>                               9,552                         8,857
<DEPRECIATION>                       4,776                         2,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       62,650                        65,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                13,235                        27,513
<BONDS>                              0                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0                             0
<PREFERRED>                          0                             0
<COMMON>                             53,443                        52,822
<OTHER-SE>                           (16,016)                      (16,119)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         62,650                        65,306
<SALES>                              7,463                         9,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     44,670                        45,620
<CGS>                                4,744                         6,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        28,693                        29,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     13,557                        13,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0                             827
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   1,672                         1,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      748                           (126)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  748                           (126)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0                             0
<CHANGES>                            0                             0
<NET-INCOME>                         748                           (126)
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.11                          (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.11                          (0.02)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6.1
 
   
 Attention:
    
    D. Brent TurnerManager, Log Supply
 Chip and Log Supply Agreement
 th
   (a)
    
    for the purposes of this pricing mechanism Pulp Mill Net means, for any Quarter, the
weighted average of the gross selling price expressed in Canadian dollars on a per tonne basis
for all long fibre kraft pulp produced for sale at Buyers Crofton pulp and paper mill and
sold during the Quarter, after deducting all customer discounts, rebates, commissions,
freight, wharfage, handling, insurance and other similar costs that Buyer pays or allows in
order to arrive at the net selling price that Buyer receives on a per tonne basis, converted
to Canadian funds using, for each of Buyers fiscal months or partial fiscal months included
in the Quarter, the average of the daily exchange rate over such fiscal months of the Bank of
Canada noon rate of exchange between the Canadian dollar and the relevant currencies;
 (b)
    
    for the period October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2007, the Chip Price will be determined as
follows:
 (i)
    
    with respect to Hemlock Chips delivered during the Quarter, a price per
Volumetric Unit equal to (***) of the Pulp Mill Net for the Quarter;
 (ii)
    
    with respect to Douglas Fir Chips delivered during the Quarter, the price in
item (i) less (***) per Volumetric Unit;




---



##### 



(iii)
    
    with respect to yellow Cedar Chips delivered during the Quarter, (***) of the
price in item (i); and
 (iv)
    
    with respect to Western Red Cedar Chips delivered during the Quarter, (***) of
the price in item (i).
      Per:Confirmed and agreed this  day of , 2006CASCADIA FOREST PRODUCTS LTD.Per:
  2
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 15a0413n.06

No. 14-4158

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

OLUFEMI YOUNG,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

OHIO

BEFORE: GUY, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Olufemi Young, a federal prisoner, appeals the sentence imposed upon 

the revocation of his term of supervised release.

Young entered a guilty plea in 2001 in the Western District of Pennsylvania to charges of 

carrying a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime and possession of a firearm by a felon. 

He was sentenced to 157 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. His 

supervised release term commenced in December 2011. Beginning in March 2013, Young 

repeatedly tested positive for marijuana. He admitted that his drug use violated the terms of his 

supervised release. A sentencing hearing was held in November 2014. The guidelines range for 

the violation was calculated at six to twelve months of imprisonment. The government argued 

for a sentence within the range. Young argued that he had successfully started his own business 

and asked to be allowed to continue his final month of supervised release. The district court 
No. 14-4158

United States v. Young

- 2 -

discussed the seriousness of the violation and the needs to promote respect for the law, to punish, 

and for deterrence in imposing a term of imprisonment of twelve months with no additional 

supervised release to follow. Young now argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. 

He states that he required drug treatment rather than incarceration.

We review a sentence imposed on the revocation of supervised release for reasonableness 

under an abuse-of-discretion standard. United States v. Bolds, 511 F.3d 568, 575 (6th Cir. 2007). 

A sentence within the guidelines range is entitled to a rebuttable presumption of substantive 

reasonableness. United States v. Trejo-Martinez, 481 F.3d 409, 413 (6th Cir. 2007); United 

States v. Morris, 448 F.3d 929, 932 (6th Cir. 2006). Young presents nothing that indicates an 

abuse of discretion by the district court or rebuts the presumption of reasonableness of his 

within-guidelines sentence. He was given the opportunity to complete drug treatment on 

supervised release and squandered that opportunity. Young’s wish for a more lenient sentence is 

insufficient to disturb the district court’s judgment. See Trejo-Martinez, 481 F.3d at 413. 

Accordingly, we affirm the sentence imposed below.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 11, 2014

No. 04-14-00158-CR

Alejandro RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR5834

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the 

punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the 

defendant. Therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a pleabargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

This court must dismiss the appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of 

appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State, 182 

S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 

Therefore, we ORDER that this appeal will be dismissed under rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure unless Appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be filed within 

THIRTY days of the date of this order showing Appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(d), 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 

S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.).

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on 

this 11th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Case 1:07-cv-05806-JSR Document 5 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05806-JSR Document 5 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05806-JSR Document 5 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY *v.*LIGHTHEISER. SAME *v.*COLLINS. SAME *v.*ROSS.

WRITS OF ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.

Nos. 141, 142, 178.

Motions to dismiss or affirm, and for damages.

Submitted November 30, 1908.

Decided December 7, 1908.

Writs of error to review judgments of Supremo Court of State of Indiana, 168 Indiana, 438, 467, and 80 N. E. Rep. 845, in suits involving the constitutionality of the Employers’ Liability Act of that State dismissed for want of jurisdiction without opinion. *Tullís*v. *Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co.,*175 U. S. 348, followed.

*Mr. Stewart T. McConnell, Mr. Albert G. Jenkines, Mr. Bertram C. Jenkines*and *Mr. Charles H. Stuart*for defendants in error in support of the motions.

*Mr. Allen Zollars*and *Mr. George E. Ross*for plaintiff in error in opposition to the motions.

*561*Per Curiam:*

Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. *Tullis*v. *Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co.,*175 U. S. 348, and cases cited; *Pittsburg &c. Ry. Co.*v. *Lightheiser,*168 Indiana, 438; *Same*v. *Collins,*168 Indiana, 467; and *Same*v. *Ross,*80 N. E. Rep. 845.
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 45 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 45 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0212 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LOUIS TED CAYE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Counsel’s motion to withdraw and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The response mus t be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender’s Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Appellant at h is last known address.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 15 2023

09/15/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0212