alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
144 So. 25

#### WARD MOTOR CO. v. ASSETS REALIZATION CO.

4 Div. 654.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 6, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 10, 1932.

*549Simmons & Simmons, of Opp, and E. O. Baldwin, of Andalusia, for appellant.

Powell, Albritton & Albritton, of Andalusia, for appellee.

FOSTER, J.

It is undoubtedly true that an indorsement of a note by the payee by which it is assigned to another is a contract in writing which fixes and establishes the obligations' of the indorser. Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Sav. Bank, 223 Ala. 271, 136 So. 409; Code, § 9092; Shows v. Jackson, 215 Ala. 256, 110 So. 273.

But neither the note nor an indorsement purports to nor does.it express the contract. of the payee or the indorsee, respectively, if there be such a contract in fact. A contemporaneous contract of the payee or indorsee, though in parol, need not contradict that of the maker or the indorser, but may be collateral to such contract by him. If it does not contradict his obligation as expressed by the tenor of his written agreement, but goes rather to the consideration of such contract, or expresses obligations of the payee or indorsee assumed on his part, which extend to the manner of payment, there is nothing which thereby alters or varies the written contract, when rightly understood. The written contract of indorsement continues in full force, and it is not altered by such collateral agreement, but a breach of the collateral agreement by plaintiff satisfies in whole or in part the obligations of such written contract. We have several times thus treated such a contract. Bell, Rogers & Zemurray Bros. v. Jenkins, 221 Ala. 652, 130 So. 396; Utley v. Stevens, 221 Ala. 666, 130 So. 405; Hardegree v. Riley, 219 Ala. 607, 122 So. 814; Jefferson County Sav. Bank v. Compton, 192 Ala. 16, 68 So. 261; Roquemore v. Vulcan Iron Works, 151 Ala. 643, 44 So. 557; Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. Beasley, 202 Ala. 35, 79 So. 373.

That was the nature of proof which appellant offered and which the court declined to permit.

A consideration of the assignments of error separately is not necessary, for they present the major question which we have considered. We think that the defense attempted to be shown was available to appellant, and that its refusal was reversible error.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
HEDGE
Street
October 18, 2006

VIA EMAIL: secretary@cfte.gov

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan, Acting Secretary
Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ie 7
3 Lafayette Centre Fs °
1155 21st Street, N.W. 5
Washington, D.C. 20581

RE: Rule Certification: HedgeStreet® Amends the Minimum Tick size for its
Consumer Price Index Binary Contracts; Submission made pursuant to
Commission Regulation §40.6(a)

Dear Acting Secretary Donovan:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (“Act”), and
§40.6(a) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(the “Commission”) under the Act, HedgeStreet, Inc. (“HedgeStreet”) hereby certifies with
the Commission its intent to increase the minimum tick size of the Consumer Price Index
Binary Contracts from $0.01 to $0.50 (“Contracts”).

HedgeStreet will first issue the Contracts with the amended Minimum Tick size on
Thursday, October 19, 2006. Since the current Contracts that have a Minimum Tick of $.01
had a Last Trade Date of Tuesday, October 17, 2006, there will be no open interest in such
Contracts upon the close of business on Wednesday, October 18, 2006.

The amendments for these Contracts are defined in Exhibit A. The rule deletions are
stricken out and the amendments and/or additions are underlined. No substantive opposing
views were expressed to HedgeStreet with respect to these amendments.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact
Stephanie Ford by telephone at (650) 638-3511 or by email at sford@hedgestreet.com.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Ford
Vice President, Legal & Compliance

ce: Tom Leahy — CFTC
Phil Colling - CFTC
Clarissa Manansala — HedgeStreet, Inc.

1825 S. Grant Street
‘Suite 500
‘San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: 650.638.3500
www.hedgestreet.com Fax: 650.638.3501



HEDGE
Street
EXHIBIT A

Amendment to Rule 12.58 only
(The following new Rule additions are underlined and deletions are stricken out)

RULE 12.58 CONSUMER PRICE INDEX BINARY HEDGELET CONTRACTS

(a) - (f) [unchanged]

(g) MINIMUM TICK -— The Minimum Tick size for the Consumer Price
Index Binary Hedgelets shall be $0-0+ $0.50.

(h) — (0) [unchanged]

[the remainder of this page is intended to be blank]

www-hedgestreet.com

1825 S. Grant Street
Suite 500

‘San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: 650.638.3500
Fax: 650.638.3501
**Exhibit 31.1**
 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
 (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 I, Don M. Gibson, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d- 15(e) ) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures , or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) [Reserved  not effective]
 
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures , as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation ; and
 
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting , to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August  10, 2004
 /s/ Don M. Gibson
 Don M. Gibson President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1833 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 35 Tulip Avenue in Floral Park, New York, 

as the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael R. Davidson Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1833 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT MICHAEL R. DAVIDSON POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 35 Tulip Avenue in Floral Park, 

5 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lieuten6 ant Michael R. Davidson Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael 

11 R. Davidson Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In re NEGUS-SONS, INC., Debtor. Rick D. Lange, Appellee v. Mutual of Omaha Bank, Appellant United States Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers Pension Plan; Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers Health and Welfare Plan; International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 571, Appellees.

No. 12-1390.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 15, 2012.

Filed: Nov. 28, 2012.

Douglas Eugene Quinn, Michael T. Eversden, Robert Diederich, on the brief, Omaha, NE, for appellant.

M.H. Weinberg, on the brief, Omaha, NE, for appellees Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers Pension Plan, Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers Health and Welfare Plan and International Union of Operation Engineers, Local No. 571.

Brian S. Kruse, on the brief, Lincoln, NE, for appellee Rick D. Lange, Chapter 7 Trustee.

Bruce R. Ellisen, Randolph L. Hutter, Department of Justice, Tax Division, on the brief, Washington, DC, for appellee United States Treasury, Internal Revenue Service.

*535Before MURPHY, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The bankruptcy court1 granted summary judgment to the trustee of debtor Negus-Sons, Inc. *In re Negus-Sons, Inc.,*BK09-82518, 2011 WL 2470478 (Bankr.D.Neb. June 20, 2011). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. *In re Negus-Sons, Inc.,*460 B.R. 754, 759 (B.A.P. 8th Cir.2011). Mutual of Omaha Bank, a claimant, appeals. This court reviews the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear error and reviews de novo the legal conclusions of the bankruptcy court and the BAP. *In re Payless Cashways, Inc.,*394 F.3d 1082, 1083 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam). For the reasons stated by the BAP, this court affirms. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Timothy J. Mahoney, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Presidential Documents

23831

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 91

Thursday, May 10, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7434 of May 7, 2001

Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month, 2001

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

As we move into the 21st century, the United States continues to greatly

benefit from the contributions of its diverse citizenry. Among those who

have influenced our country, Asian/Pacific Americans merit special recognition. Their achievements have greatly enriched our quality of life and have

helped to determine the course of our Nation’s future.

Many immigrants of Asian heritage came to the United States in the nineteenth century to work in the agricultural and transportation industries.

Laboring under very difficult conditions, they helped construct the western

half of the first transcontinental railroad. Their hard work was invaluable

in linking together the East and West coasts, thus vastly expanding economic

growth and development across the country. Over time, other immigrants

journeyed to America from East Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Asian Subcontinent. Today, Asian/Pacific Americans are one of the fastest growing segments

of our population, having increased in number from fewer than 1.5 million

in 1970 to approximately 10.5 million in 2000.

Asian/Pacific Americans bring to our society a rich cultural heritage representing many languages, ethnicities, and religious traditions. Whether in

government, business, science, technology, or the arts, Asian/Pacific Americans have added immeasurably to the prosperity and vitality of our society.

As family members, citizens, and involved members of the community,

they reinforce the values and ideals that are essential to the continued

well-being of our Nation.

Diversity represents one of our greatest strengths, and we must strive to

ensure that all Americans have the opportunity to reach their full potential.

By recognizing the accomplishments and contributions of Asian/Pacific

Americans, our Nation celebrates the importance of inclusion in building

a brighter future for all our citizens.

To honor the achievements of Asian/Pacific Americans, the Congress, by

Public Law 102-450, has designated the month of May each year as ‘‘Asian/

Pacific American Heritage Month.’’

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 2001, as Asian/

Pacific American Heritage Month. I call upon the people of the United

States to learn more about the contributions and history of Asian/Pacific

Americans and to celebrate the role they have played in our national story.

23832 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 91 / Thursday, May 10, 2001 / Presidential Documents

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventh day

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand one, and of the Independence

of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

Filed 5

Billing code 3195

[FR Doc. 01

–9–01; 8:45 am]

–11913

–01–P

W
No. 545.

#### L. T. Johnston, Petitioner, v. H. D. Sexton et al.

November 2, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. *Mr. Edward C. Kramer,*for petitioner. *Mr. Charles P. Wise*for respondents.
Exhibit 32.2





CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carter Peters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Carter Peters





Carter Peters


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)





August 12, 2009





*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion issued April 1 8 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 18
- 01055
- CV

——————————— JOYCE CHENIER , Appella nt

V. REVERSE MORTGAGE SOL UTIONS INC. , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2018
- 51559

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant has neither established indigence, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk ’ s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence) ; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being notified that2

this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,186
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              80
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                80
<LOANS>                                        128,064
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,565
<DEPOSITS>                                     156,631
<SHORT-TERM>                                    33,527
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,232
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           288
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 213,565
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,366
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,655
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    56
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,077
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,717
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,315
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,762
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      161
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  73
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    791
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       573
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.70
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,728
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   939
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       65
<RECOVERIES>                                        25
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,059
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,059


</TABLE>
Clear All

        17 August 2022    

                    USS Bulkeley (DDG 84), latest FDNF-E ship, arrives in new homeport Rota, Spain                 
                NAVAL STATION ROTA, Spain - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Bulkeley (DDG 84) arrived in its new homeport, Naval Station Rota, Spain, as the U.S. Navy’s last Forward Deployed Naval Forces–Europe (FDNF-E) destroyer scheduled to shift its homeport to Rota, Spain, Aug. 17, 2022.            

        17 June 2022    

                    USS Paul Ignatius arrives in new homeport of Rota, Spain                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) arrived in its new homeport of Naval Station Rota, Spain, as the U.S. Navy’s newest Forward Deployed Naval Forces–Europe (FDNF-E) destroyer, June 17, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# CBRNResponder: FEMA’s One-Stop Shop for CBRN Incident Management and Data Sharing

**Posted: April 13, 2023**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Data
            - Equipment and technology
            - Hazmat

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

CBRNResponder is a secure platform for chemical, biological or radioactive/nuclear (CBRN) incident data sharing and multi-hazard event management. It serves as a hub and one-stop shop for all-hazards planning, preparedness, operational tools and resources.

## Why is CBRNResponder important?

Technology that facilitates incident management and the rapid capture and sharing of data is often needed in CBRN incidents.

During a CBRN incident, environmental sampling, mapping and computer modeling are often used to characterize the location and extent of a release and to predict the movement of hazardous materials in the environment. This generates a lot of data that must be analyzed quickly for decision-making and development of a common operating picture.

## Who can access CBRNResponder?

CBRNResponder is used by state, local, tribal and territorial agencies to manage their CBRN incidents and associated data. The service integrates with federal assets if a Stafford Act declaration is requested.

## What is the CBRNResponder Network?

The CBRNResponder Network includes:
            - RadResponder
            - ChemResponder
            - BioResponder
            - The Interagency Modeling and Atmospheric Assessment Center (IMAAC) Portal

The network is supported by a 24/7 emergency support hotline. Live training webinars are conducted monthly, and recordings are posted to CBRNResponder’s YouTube channel and the CBRNResponder Network website.

Currently, more than 2,200 emergency response organizations and more than 13,000 responders are using the CBRNResponder Network.

## What is the cost for access?

CBRNResponder is sponsored by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other federal partners and is free to all federal, state, local, tribal and territorial emergency response organizations.

If you are interested in joining, email support@cbrnresponder.net to request an account.

This article is based on content in theApril 13, 2023 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 2 - Chernobyl      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we talk about the Chernobyl disaster.

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

### **Episode 2 - Chernobyl**

**Download and Transcript Access**

**Summary**: When the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant's Reactor 4 disaster struck Ukraine on April 26, 1986, Landsat satellites were among the first to capture visual evidence of its widespread impact. The disaster focused the world's attention on the value of remote sensing.

**Guest**: John Dwyer, EROS Science Branch Chief

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: Brian Hauge

**Release date**: Sept. 9, 2019

**More on Chernobyl and remote sensing**: 
                            - Earthshots - Chernobyl
                            - Chernobyl 30 years later

### Contacts