alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

I, Alan D. Feldman, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan D. Feldman                            
|Alan D. Feldman                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: November 6, 2008                         

I, William M. Guzik, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ William M. Guzik        
|William M. Guzik            
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     
|Date: November 6, 2008
#### Hamilton *vs.*The Eden Gold Mining Company *et al.*

1. Whether, in a deed to land, a clause reserving to the grantor all minerals and mining privileges thereon constitutes a reservation or exemption, and whether it would be void as being a saving as large as the grant, is not decided, because the question was not argued before this court.

2. Under the facts of this case, there was no error in refusing to grant an injunction to restrain one who held under the grantee of a deed containing such a provision from using certain water on the land and a certain mill for pounding and washing ore taken by him from an adjacent lot. No harm can come to the complainant thereby; and it is directed that the case be held for a full and final trial before the court and jury.

December 15, 1885.

Heeds. Estates. Contracts. Mines and Mining. Before Judge Harris. Douglas County. At Chambers. April 9, 1885.

Reported in the decision.

J. S- James; P. H. Brewster; O. D. Camp, for plaintiff in error.

Thomas W. Latham ; A. L. Bartlett, for defendants.

Blandeord, Justice.

Hamilton sold and conveyed a certain tract of land in fee, reserving to himself all minerals thereon and mining privileges.' The defendants acquired title to a portion of this land from the grantee of plaintiff. The plaintiff filed this bill to prevent the defendants from using certain water on the land and a certain mill for pounding and washing ore taken by defendants from an adjacent lot belonging to them The court refused the injunction, and plaintiff excepted.

1. Whether the words reserving to himself all minerals and mining privileges constitute a reservation or an ex*448ception, we do not now decide; it may become important hereafter. See Shep. Touch., 80. In Shoenberger *vs.*Lyon, 7 W. & S., 184, the words “ excepting and reserving ” were Construed to be an exception, and were set aside on the principle that every saving in a deed as large as the grant is void. But we leave this deed to future construction, inasmuch as this point was not argued before us.

2. We are unanimous that the court did right to refuse the temporary injunction in this case, as there can come no harm to plaintiff on that account, under the facts; for whatever may be the rights of the grantor, it is clear that the grantee had the right to erect the mill and use the water on the land. We are satisfied that this case should go to trial before a jury, where all the facts can be submitted to the court and jury, and for this purpose we direct that the bill be held up for a full hearing so that the case may be intelligently adjudicated. There are many Questions which may arise in this case of the first importance, which are not clearly stated in the record, and which have not been argued before us ; and upon a full investigation, we will be better enabled to consider and decide them.

Judgment affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

______________________________________________

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH)

_______________________________________________

GREGORY FISCO AND NICOLE FISCO, 07-CV-05289 (AKH)

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF TRC

ENGINEERS, INC.’S

ADOPTION OF ANSWER

-against- TO MASTER COMPLAINT

100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________________

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant TRC Engineers, Inc. (“TRC”), as and for its

response to the allegations set forth in the Amended Complaint by Adoption (“Amended CheckOff Complaint”) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby

adopts TRC’s Answer to Master Complaint dated August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter

of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). To

the extent that TRC’s Answer to the Master Complaint does not comprehensively address any of

the specific allegations within the Amended Check-Off Complaint in the above-captioned matter,

TRC denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of such specific

allegations. TRC further reserves its right to assert cross-claims against its co-defendants to the

extent such cross-claims are not already deemed to have been asserted by court order.

WHEREFORE, TRC demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action as

Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 33 Filed 06/20/2008 Page 1 of 3
W:\12000\12049\Pleadings\TRC's Notices of Adoption of Answer to Master Complaint\Fisco, Gregory & Nicole (Amended COC) 07-CV-05289.doc

2

against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: Albany, New York

June 20, 2007

WHITEMAN OSTERMAN & HANNA LLP

By: /s/ John J. Henry

_____________________________________

John J. Henry (JH-7137)

William S. Nolan (WN-8091)

Attorneys for Defendant TRC Engineers, Inc.

One Commerce Plaza

Albany, New York 12260

(518) 487-7600

Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 33 Filed 06/20/2008 Page 2 of 3
W:\12000\12049\Pleadings\TRC's Notices of Adoption of Answer to Master Complaint\Fisco, Gregory & Nicole (Amended COC) 07-CV-05289.doc

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Carrie L. Lalyer, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of Defendant TRC

Engineers, Inc.’s Notice of Adoption of Answer and Defenses to Master Complaint was served

this 20th day of May, 2008, via ECF upon the ECF participants.

/s/ Carrie L. Lalyer

____________________________________

Carrie L. Lalyer

Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 33 Filed 06/20/2008 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 26873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases Special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: June 19, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, 2101 Wisconsin Ave, NW., 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: John R. Lymangrover, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., 
Room 5As25N, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 3, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-12121 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

WILSON SANCHEZ,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-05386-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 28 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 17, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 28 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 27-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 27-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1169-000]


Nicor Energy, L.L.C; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 7, 2001.
    Nicor Energy, L.L.C. (Nicor) submitted for filing a rate schedule 
under which Nicor will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions at market-based rates. Nicor also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Nicor requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Nicor.
    On April 17, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Nicor should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Nicor is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Nicor's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 17, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11886 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
SCWC

- 20

- 0000461

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

SASHA NARVAEZ, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 20

- 0000461; Case No. 1FFC

- 20

- 0000149)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant Sasha Narvaez’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed o n September 12, 2022,

is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, September 29, 2022

.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/ s/ Todd. W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-20-0000461 29-SEP-2022 09:22 AM Dkt. 10 ODAC
**Exhibit** **** **32.2**




**CFO
        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350***





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Bruce Winston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




/s/
      Bruce Winston




Bruce
      Winston


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





November 14,
      2006





*
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50153

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIEL DOMINGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:99-CR-371-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Daniel Dominguez seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on

appeal. To proceed IFP on appeal, Dominguez must show that he is a pauper

and that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Jackson v. Dallas

Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986).

Dominguez filed in the district court two motions, asserting that he had

satisfied his criminal judgment that was entered on November 9, 2000.

Dominguez’s motions were unauthorized motions which the district court was

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50153 Document: 00511269902 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2010
No. 10-50153

without jurisdiction to entertain. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142

(5th Cir. 1994). The district court could not construe the motions as FED.

R. CRIM. P. 35 motions because they were neither made by the Government nor

made within seven days of sentencing. See FED. R. CRIM P. 35; Early, 27 F.3d at

141. The motions were also not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because

they were not based upon an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines. See

§ 3582(c)(2); Early, 27 F.3d at 142. In addition, the district court could not

construe the motions under 18 U.S.C. § 3742, as relief thereunder is reserved

only for direct appeals. See § 3742. Finally, the district court did not have

jurisdiction to construe the motions as 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions because

Dominguez had previously filed a § 2255 motion and had not received permission

from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion. See Hooker v. Sivley, 187 F.3d

680, 681-82 (5th Cir. 1999).

Dominguez’s appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore dismissed

as frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir.

R. 42.2.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

2

Case: 10-50153 Document: 00511269902 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2010
#                                                                         VFA-131 Receives Captain Michael J. Estocin Award                                                                    

##### by COMNAVAIRLANT Public Affairs

03 November 2022
            SLIDESHOW | 1 images | 221103-N-RQ186-1001                    221103-N-RQ186-1001                            221103-N-RQ186-1001                                            1 of 1                                        221103-N-RQ186-1001                                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. - The "Wildcats" of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 131 were presented with the Captain Michael J. Estocin Award during a ceremony in the squadron's hangar at Naval Air Station (NAS) Oceana, Nov. 3The Wildcats Commanding Officer, Cmdr. Erin Flint, a native of Gloversville, New York, received the award on behalf of the squadron.“This award is a testament to the professionalism and excellence exhibited each day by our team,” said Flint. “From our pilots to our aircraft maintainers, we all share in this success and it demonstrates that we remain ready to support any mission in defense of our nation.”The award is presented annually to the best strike fighter squadron in recognition of outstanding achievements to naval aviation. It is named after Capt. Michael J. Estocin, a naval aviator who received the Medal of Honor for his actions during the Vietnam War.The Wildcats were selected from a highly competitive field that includes all F-18E/F and F-35C squadrons within the Navy following sustained superior performance throughout fiscal year (FY) 2021.While deployed during a six month combat deployment aboard the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) in 2021, the squadron operated from the North Atlantic to the Gulf of Oman. They demonstrated maintenance and operational excellence by flying 3,475 flight hours and achieving a 100 percent combat sortie completion rate in support of Operation Freedom's Sentinel.The squadron was also awarded the FY20 Chief of Naval Operations Safety "S" Award at the-start of 2021 and they were the East Coast strike fighter squadron FY21 Battle ‘E’ award recipient.For more information about the Wildcats visit VFA 131 (navy.mil)

Tags:
**NAS Oceana**Squadron**VFA 131

Terms:
**Awards, Honors & Recognition
Case 1:07-cv-05393-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05393-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-9 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1066

DEBORAH A. MESSINA, Petitioner – Appellant,

v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Court No. 04-10926)

Submitted: September 28, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deborah A. Messina, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Ann Ketchum, Robert W. Metzler, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: In a prior appeal, we upheld the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in Deborah Messina’s 1994 income taxes. However, based on the Commissioner’s concession that, subject to certain limitations, Messina was entitled to a deduction under 26 U.S.C. § 212(1) for the contingency fee paid to her attorney, we vacated in part and remanded the case to the tax court with instructions for that court to recompute Messina’s tax deficiency and penalties after affording her the deduction. The tax court has since adopted the Commissioner’s computation of Messina’s 1994 income tax liability and penalties for 1994, finding that the computation reflects this court’s

mandate. Messina filed this appeal from the tax court’s orders upholding the Commissioner’s determinations of a deficiency in her 1994 income taxes and additions to tax and denying her

motion to vacate that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Messina v. Comm’r, IRS , Tax Ct. No. 04-10926 (U.S.T.C. June 24, 2008 & filed Sept. 25, 2008; entered Sept. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

23 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED