alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7878

HERBERT J. ROBINSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Public Safety,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (3:19-cv-00511-MR)

Submitted: March 23, 2021 Decided: March 29, 2021

Before THACKER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert J. Robinson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Herbert J. Robinson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

In his informal brief, Robinson does not challenge the district court’s determination 

that his § 2254 petition was untimely. Because, on appeal, we limit our review to the issues 

raised in the appellant’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 

775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under 

Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”), we conclude 

that Robinson has failed to show that the district court’s procedural ruling is debatable.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 11    

           FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
                                     Year Ended December 31,    
                              -------------------------------------  
                                  1996            1995       1994      
                                  ----            ----       ----
 <S>                           <C>            <C>         <C>
 Weighted average shares:                                
    Shares outstanding         12,464,982     12,351,622  12,265,240   
    Estimated increase in                                
     shares outstanding due
     to allowed claims                                      
     exceeding $85 million (1)    691,367        707,693     823,035   
    Less treasury stock        (2,392,795)    (2,395,295) (2,395,295)  
    Net effect of dilutive                               
     warrants based on the
     treasury stock method        641,461        415,769     376,287   
                               ----------     ----------  ----------   
 Totaled weighted average                                
 shares outstanding            11,405,015     11,079,789  11,069,267   
                               ==========     ==========  ==========   
                                                         
 Net earnings                  $14,863,000    $8,029,000  $12,269,000  
                               ===========    ==========  ===========  
                                                                       
                                                         
 Net earnings per share             $1.30           $.72       $1.11   
                                    =====           ====       =====   


(1)  In  accordance   with  the   terms  of  the   plans  of
     reorganization, the  number of  shares to be  issued to
     unsecured claim holders will  increase if the amount of
     the allowed unsecured claims  exceeds $85 million.  The
     number of shares issued  will be increased to a  number
     equal to  10,000,000 multiplied by the  quotient of the
     total amount of the allowed unsecured claims divided by
     $85 million.   For purposes  of the earnings  per share
     computation, the estimated amount of  remaining allowed
     unsecured claims  totaled $5.8  million as  of December
     31, 1996.<PAGE>

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 ROCK-TENN COMPANY
 SUBSIDIARIES OF ROCK-TENN COMPANY
 NAME
    
    JURISDICTION
OF INCORPORATIONAlliance Display, LLC
    
    DelawareAlliance Display Company of Canada
    
    Nova Scotia, CanadaAlliance Services Mexico, S. de. R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoAlliance Rock-Tenn Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoDominion Paperboard Products Ltd.
    
    Quebec, CanadaGroupe Cartem Wilco Inc.
    
    Quebec, CanadaLing Industries, Inc.
    
    Quebec, CanadaLing Quebec, Inc.
    
    Quebec, CanadaPCPC, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaRock-Tenn Canada Holdings II, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Canada Holdings, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Company of Canada
    
    Nova Scotia, CanadaRock-Tenn Company of Canada II
    
    Nova Scotia, CanadaRock-Tenn Company of Canada III
    
    Nova Scotia, CanadaRock-Tenn Company of Texas
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Company, Mill Division, LLC
    
    TennesseeRock-Tenn Converting Company
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Financial, Inc.
    
    DelawareRock-Tenn Mill Company, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Packaging and Paperboard, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Packaging Company
    
    DelawareRock-Tenn Partition Company
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Real Estate, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Services Inc.
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Shared Services, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRTS Embalajes de Argentina
    
    ArgentinaRTS Embalajes De Chile Limitada
    
    ChileRTS Empaques, S. De R.L. CV
    
    MexicoRTS Packaging Foreign Holdings, LLC
    
    GeorgiaWaldorf Corporation
    
    DelawareWilco Inc.
    
    Quebec, Canada
Exhibit 4.1


 


 





0000001 SEE REVERSE
FOR IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING OWNERSHIP ANDTRANSFER RESTRICTIONS AND CERTAIN OTHER INFORMATIONINCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF COLORADOSEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONSTreasurerCUSIP 75601 N5 00RGSChief Executive OfficeREAL GOODS SOLAR, INC
REAL GOODS SOLAR, INC.1996COLORADOFULLY-PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE PAR VALUE OF $0.0001 EACH OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK
OFReal Goods Solar, Inc. (hereinafter called the “Company”), transferable in person or by duly authorized attorney,
upon surrender of this Certifiate properly endorsed at the Company’s headquarters office.This Certificateand the shares
represented hereby, are issued subject to all of the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, as amended and the Bylaws of
the Company, and to the rights, preferences and voting powers of the capital stock of the Company, now or hereafter outstanding,
the terms of all such provisions, rights, preferences and voting powers being incorporated herein by reference.Witness the facsimile
seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers 


 






     


     


    

 


 


 


 


Upon request in
writing and without charge, the Company will furnish the holder of this Certificatewith the designations, preferences, limitations,
and relative rights applicable to each class of capital stock of the Company, the variations in preferences, limitations, and
rights determined for each series of capital stock of the Company and the authority of the board of directors of the Company to
determine variations for future classes or series of capital stock of the Company.
July 26, 2006

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2710.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of July 2008 Soybean options.
This option contract ordinarily would be authorized for trading in February 2007. Due to
customer demand, the Exchange intends to list this contract earlier than usual (i.e., as of July 27,
2006).
This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.

There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

LUIS K ENCALADA 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 5354 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial 

Properties, L.P., BFP Tower C Co. LLC, BFP Tower C MM LLC, and WFP Retail 

Co. L.P. (collectively the "Brookf~ield Parties"), as and for their responses to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related 

to the Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the 

Brookfield Parties' Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, 

which was filed in the matter of~n re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster 

Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the 

above captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and 

disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05354-AKH Document 27 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

January 31 2008 

Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee, LLP 

By/ Willilam J. Smithl~S~37) 

Attornevg for the Brookfield Parties 

TwaRecfor Street; 20'h Flor 

New Pdrk, NY 10006 

(2'12) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05354-AKH Document 27 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05404-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05404-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05404-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05404-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05404-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05404-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 6 of 6
Eurex Clearing AG 

Weekly Summary of Rule Amendments 

No. 004-23 

January 20, 2023 

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) submits this Weekly 

Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of January 16, 2023: 

· Eurex Clearing Circular No. 004-23 (January 20, 2023): Amendments to the Clearing Conditions 

of Eurex Clearing AG Due to the Implementation of Article 9 (14) of Regulation (EU) 2021/24 

(“Second Skin in the Game”) – End of Consultation. This circular states that there were some 

comments received regarding Eurex Clearing Circular 088/22, which was submitted previously as 

a 40.6 submission, but the comments did not relate to the proposed amendments to the Clearing 

Conditions, and Eurex Clearing is keeping the wording as set forth in that circular and 40.6 

submission. Eurex Clearing Circular No. 004-23 confirms the effective date of February 12, 

2023 stated in that circular.

Copies of the above material is available at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/find/circulars. If you require 

any additional information, please contact the undersigned at (312) 544-1087. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer 

By: Eric Seinsheimer 

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG 

Dated: January 20, 2023
-  Home 
-  Budget 
-  Strategic Planning & Performance 
-  Program Book 
-  Links 
-  Glossary 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

# Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

The Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI) secures fiscal resources needed for the USGS to perform its scientific mission goals, facilitates information sharing internally and externally, and provides in-depth analysis of budget and program performance data for the USGS to understand, anticipate, and respond to shifts in social and political paradigms.

### Budget

Learn More

### Planning & Performance 

Learn More

### Program Book

Learn More

View Media Details

Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) | White House (whitehouse.gov)

Investing in America’s Infrastructure | U.S. Department of the Interior (doi.gov)

USGS Scientific Innovation  | U.S. Department of the Interior (doi.gov)

Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Investments | U.S. Geological Survey (usgs.gov)

## News

President Proposes Nearly $1.8 Billion for USGS Science in FY 2024

March 9, 2023

####   President Proposes Nearly $1.8 Billion for USGS Science in FY 2024

President Proposes $1.7 Billion FY 2023 Budget for USGS

March 28, 2022

####   President Proposes $1.7 Billion FY 2023 Budget for USGS

President Biden’s Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Makes Significant Investments in USGS Initiatives

May 28, 2021

####   President Biden’s Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Makes Significant Investments in USGS Initiatives

View All

### Contacts

#### Anne Barrett

##### Associate Director

Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

abarrett@usgs.gov

703-648-4379

#### Andrew Street

##### Chief of Staff 

Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

astreet@usgs.gov

703-648-4479

#### Arista Maher

##### Deputy Associate Director and Budget Officer

Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

amaher@usgs.gov

703-648-6031
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11892]



[[Page 24131]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP96-129-014 and RP91-54-014]


Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 7, 2001.
    Take notice that on April 23, 2001, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the 
filing, to become effective May 1, 2001.
    Trunkline states that this filing is being filed to implement the 
terms of the January 29, 2001 Stipulation and Agreement in Docket No. 
RP96-129-000 and RP91-54-000 (Not Consolidated) (Settlement). The 
Settlement has been approved by the Commission's Order Approving 
Settlement issued April 12, 2001.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 95 FERC para. 61,049 (2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Trunkline states that copies of the filing are being served on all 
jurisdictional customers, interested state regulatory agencies and 
parties to this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www/
ferc/fed/us/online/rims. htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www/ferc/fed/us/
efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11892 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                 10
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                          (1)
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       19
<PP&E>                                 15
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         34
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 294
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            6,113
<OTHER-SE>                         (6,640)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           34
<SALES>                               749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      749
<CGS>                                 756
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    (10)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       693
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   693
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                          693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .07
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Estate of John R. Dugan, Deceased. K & K Transportation Corp., Respondent; John R. Dugan, Jr., Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to EPTL 11-4.6 for leave to execute upon a judgment recovered against an estate, the appeal is from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Rockland County (Weiner, S.), dated December 15, 1987, which dismissed the counterclaims asserted in the estate’s answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable to the respondent out of the estate.

Contrary to the appellant administrator’s contention, the Surrogate’s Court properly dismissed the counterclaims which challenged the validity of a default judgment procured by the petitioner in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey. Notably, the appellant previously raised and litigated the claims of fraudulent conduct on the part of the petitioner in obtaining the default judgment, when the appellant unsuccessfully sought to vacate the judgment in the New Jersey Superior Court and on appeal to the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division. Similarly, the appellant unsuccessfully raised these same claims in opposition to the petitioner’s application in the Supreme Court, Rockland County, for sum*942mary judgment in lieu of complaint (CPLR 3213) based on the New Jersey judgment, which resulted in a judgment in favor of the petitioner in the principal amount of $22,943.79. Under these circumstances, the Surrogate’s Court properly refused to relitigate the issues previously decided by the New Jersey courts as well as the Supreme Court, Rockland County *(see, Matter of Braker,*127 Misc 2d 894, *mod on other grounds*123 AD2d 585). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  about 
-  Congressional 

#           Briefing Series      

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional     -  Briefing Series 
  -  Official Statements 
  -  Contacts 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

Our Congressional Briefing Series began in 1999, in order to increase Congressional awareness of the role and relevance of our science in the public policy debate and to ensure that science is at the table when Congress is making decisions. Explore presentations, biographies of speakers, partner and sponsor websites, and other information for each briefing. 

link

May 2, 2014

####                 Streamgages ≈ Follow the Flow              

Water is key to life. Floods, droughts, pollution—all threaten our health, happiness and prosperity. Streamgages provide critical information that the public, emergency responders, and resource managers need to protect, manage, and sustain our Nation's surface waters.

Communications and Publishing

link

February 28, 2014

####                 Exploring Earthquakes: Analyzing the Past to Protect Lives and Property Today              

In March 1964, the largest earthquake ever recorded in North America struck Alaska, shaking Anchorage and an area larger than the state of California for more than 4 minutes and causing landslides and tsunamis that took lives in Alaska, Oregon, and California.

Communications and Publishing

link

December 13, 2013

####                 Critical Minerals: Ensuring America's Future              

This year's theme is "Start with Science"

Third in the 2013 Series

link

September 13, 2013

####                 Every Drop Counts: Progress Towards a National Water Census              

This year's theme is "Start with Science"

Second in the 2013 Series

link

May 10, 2013

####                 Landsat 8 Begins              

This year's theme is "Start with Science"

First in the 2013 Series

link

September 28, 2012

####                 Earthquake Early Warning: Every Second Counts              

This year's theme is "Start with Science"

Third in the 2012 Series

link

July 27, 2012

####                 Groundwater - A Critical Resource for our Nation              

This year's theme is "Start with Science"

Second in the 2012 Series

Water Resources, Communications and Publishing

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹ Previous 
-                Page            1 
-                Current page            2
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Preem Holdings AB (publ) (the "Company"), does hereby certify to such officer's knowledge that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 28, 2005

|By: |  | /s/KARIM KARAMANName: Karim Karaman
Title: Managing Director |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

Date:
April 28, 2005

|By: |  | /s/PER HÖJGÅRDName: Per Höjgård
Title: Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks