alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.4  


NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION

PRO FORMA EARNINGS COVERAGE RATIO

(MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS)  


Pro forma
earnings coverage ratio for the twelve-month periods ended (unaudited)(1): 



	 
	 	December 31, 2004
	 	September 30, 2005
	 
	Net income	 	$	252	 	$	126	 
	Interest expense	 	 	102	 	 	108	 
	Income tax expense	 	 	83	 	 	56	 
	Preferred securities distributions	 	 	4	 	 	—	 
	 	 	
	 	
	 
	 	 	$	441	 	$	290	 
	 	 	
	 	
	 
	Annual interest requirement	 	$	139	 	$	140	 
	 	 	
	 	
	 
	Pro forma earnings coverage ratio(2)	 	 	3.2	x	 	2.1	x
	 	 	
	 	
	 






	(1)
	Calculated
in accordance with Canadian securities law disclosure requirements.



	(2)
	Pro forma
earnings coverage ratio is equal to net income before interest expense on long-term debt, income taxes and distributions on preferred securities, for the
twelve-month periods indicated, divided by annual interest requirements on long-term debt. For purposes of calculating the pro forma financial ratio set forth above,
long-term debt includes the current portion of long-term debt and the notes exchanged in this offering.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**LASER MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, INC.**

Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the periodic report of LASER Mortgage Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William J. Michaelcheck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated. |

 

| Date: August 14, 2003 | /s/  WILLIAM J. MICHAELCHECK                  |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |                                                    |   |
|                  | **William J. Michaelcheck**                        |   |
|                  | **Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director** |   |
|                  |                                               |   |
EXHIBIT 23.1

Board of Directors
Oxford Investments Holdings Inc.
Toronto, Ontario
Canada



                     CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent  to the use of our  report  dated  June 30,  2004,  on the  financial
statements of Oxford  Investments  Holdings Inc. as of December 31, 2003,  2002,
and 2001 and the period  then  ended,  and the  inclusion  of our name under the
heading  "Experts"  in the  Form  20-F  Registration  Statement  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



/s/Williams & Webster, P.S.
---------------------------
Williams & Webster, P.S.
Spokane, Washington

July 14, 2004
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 842 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States Courthouse to be constructed 

in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United 

States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 842 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States Courthouse to be constructed at 

3 the site bounded on the north by Court Street, on the west 

4 by West Street, on the south by South Street, and on the 

5 east by President Street in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United 

7 States Courthouse’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the court11 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref12 erence to the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of David Samuels, a Suspended Attorney, for Reinstatement.

—Application for reinstatement referred to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department to make a determination as to petitioner’s character and general fitness to practice law at this time, as indicated. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
exv10w2



 






Exhibit 10.2




EXECUTION COPY




FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT




     THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT dated December 28, 2005, is made by and between Pac-West Telecomm,
Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”) and Henry R. Carabelli (“Executive”) for the purpose
of amending certain provisions of the Executive Agreement between the parties entered into as of
July 1, 2003 (“the Executive Agreement”).




1. Section 3 (e) of the Executive Agreement is amended to read as follows:




“(e) Additional Incentives. In order to better align the Executive’s incentives to long
term shareholder value, by a grant dated December 29, 2003, the Company issued restricted stock
units to Executive representing rights to receive 400,000 shares of the common stock of Company
before giving effect to any stock split or reverse stock split. With the agreement of
Executive, on December 28, 2005, the Company cancelled the prior grant of restricted stock
units and approved the issuance of 400,000 shares of Restricted Stock in its place and stead.
The parties are in agreement that 200,000 of such shares of restricted stock (adjusted for any
Stock Split) shall become vested provided Executive remains employed by Company through June
30, 2009 or in the event of Change of Control. The parties are in further agreement that the
right to the remaining 200,000 shares (adjusted for any Stock Split) will vest or become
absolute upon the earlier of June 30, 2009 or the Company achieving the previously agreed to
pre-established goals as set forth in the terms of the December 29, 2003 grant (which are also
contained in the December 27, 2005 grant) during the term of Executive’s employment or in the
event of a Change of Control. The terms of the 2005 grant are contained in a Grant agreement
issued pursuant to the 1999 Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) as in
effect at the time of the grant. The Shares of stock of the Company issued to the Executive
shall be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of
1933 pursuant to a then effective registration statement or shall be otherwise freely
transferable by the Executive once vested.”




2. Except as amended by this FIRST AMENDMENT, the Executive Agreement remains in full force and
effect in accordance with all of its original terms.



1









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this FIRST AMENDMENT on the date written above.




PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC.




/s/
Sam Plum 






Name: Sam Plum




Its: Compensation Committee Chair




EXECUTIVE




/s/ Henry R. Carabelli 






Henry Carabelli







2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:22 a.m. on Tuesday, May 8, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters relating to the Corporation's supervisory activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director John M. Reich (Appointive), seconded by Director Ellen S. Seidman (Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Director John D. Hawke, Jr. (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Donna Tanoue, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: May 8, 2001.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

James D. LaPierre,

Deputy Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12033  Filed 5-9-01; 12:17 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
#### In the Matter of Jacqueline M. James, as Objector, Appellant, v Minnie Gillette, as Candidate for the Nomination of the Democratic Party for the Office of Erie County *521Legislator, Third District, et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Special Term, Rossetti, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.—Election Law.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1987.)
154 So. 788

#### GRAVES et al. v. GRAVES.

3 Div. 107.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 10, 1934.

Rehearing Denied May 31, 1934.

Ball & Ball, of Montgomery, for appellants.

Ballard & Ballard, of Montgomery, for appellee.

THOMAS, Justice.

The decree on the contest of the will recites; “The court has heard the case without a jury on the issue between the proponent and the contestants that the will of the deceased was not duly executed, and has heard the testimony orally,” etc. The will was admitted to probate.

The evidence of the subscribing witnesses has been considered at length, and the court is of the opinion that the will of W. A. Graves, deceased, was executed as required by the statute (section 1059S, Code), as con-*643«trued and applied by this court (Reynolds et al. v. Massey et al., 219 Ala. 265, 270, 122 So. 29; Green et al. v. Davis [Ala. Sup.] 153 So. 2401); and this is shown by the evidence, giving a due regard to the burden of proof of the due execution being upon the proponent (Reynolds et al. v. Massey et al., supra; Massey et al. v. Reynolds et al., 213 Ala. 178, 104 So. 494; Elston v. Price, 210 Ala. 579, 98 So. 573).

The testimony of the subscribing witnesses, while it has its infirmities, tends to show that the will was signed by testator in the presence of the subscribing witnesses with the fountain pen of the witness Harris; that the same pen was used by the subscribing witnesses in affixing 'their signatures to the will as such, at the same time and place; and this testimony is corroborated by the signatures as they appear on the original will which we have before us.

The judgment of the circuit court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

1

 Ante, p. 162.
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05553-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05553-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1263** 

In R e: TIMOTHY HUGH LINDSEY , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 5:08

- cr - 00091

- BR

- 1; 5:12

- cv - 00350

- BR )

Submitted : June 26, 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Timothy Hugh Lindsey , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Hugh Lindsey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a certificate of appealability after dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied a certificate of appealability in the March 21, 2013 order dismissing the § 2255 motion, and, on March 28, 2013, denied as moot Lindsey’s separate motion for a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, because the district court has already ruled on Lindsey’s request for a certificate of appealability , we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Date: April 10, 2009
    /s/ Ron  ZwanzigerRon ZwanzigerChief Executive OfficerDate: April 10, 2009
    /s/ David TeitelDavid TeitelChief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
142 So. 918

#### Mrs. A. L. REESE, Adm’x, v. A. E. HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.

7 Div. 138.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 19, 1932.

J.- A. Johnson, of Ft. Payne, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

Rule nisi denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 2 
          - [FRL-6978-6] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Reopening of comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

On December 21, 2000 (65 FR 80394), EPA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) regarding potential revision of the confidential business information (CBI). EPA is reopening the comment period in order to afford the public the opportunity to provide additional comments concerning the ANPRM. The comment period will close on June 13, 2001. We believe it is necessary to reopen the comment period as a courtesy to the public in response to public requests for additional time to consolidate comments on the proposal following the public meeting held on March 7, 2001. 

# DATES:

EPA must receive comments on the ANPRM by June 13, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Written comments should be submitted (in duplicate if possible) to Docket Number EC-2000-004, Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center (ECDIC), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Room 4033, Mail Code 2201A, Washington, DC 20460; Phone, 202-564-2614 or 202-564-2119; Fax, 202-501-1011 E-Mail,                         *docket.oeca@epa.gov.*                         Documents related to this advance notice of proposed rulemaking are available for public inspection and viewing by contacting the ECDIC at this same address. The ECDIC is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alan Margolis, Office of Information Collection, Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Mail Code 2822, Washington, DC 20460; Phone, 202-260-9329; Fax, 202-401-4544; Email,                         *margolis.alan@epa.gov.*

Dated: May 7, 2001. 

Margaret N. Schneider, 

Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Environmental Information. 

[FR Doc. 01-12044 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 1 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 2 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 3 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 4 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 5 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 6 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 7 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 8 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 9 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 10 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 11 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 12 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 13 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 14 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 15 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 16 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 17 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 18 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 19 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 20 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 21 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 22 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 23 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 24 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 25 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 26 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 27 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 28 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 29 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 30 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 31 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 32 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 33 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 34 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 35 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 36 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 37 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 38 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 39 of 40

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL     Document 1      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 40 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-05714-CS-MDF     Document 9      Filed 09/20/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05791-CM     Document 4      Filed 07/31/2007     Page 1 of 1