# EUR-Lex - 52005PC0183(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005PC0183(01)

**Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing of an Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation /* COM/2005/0183 final - ACC 2005/0066 */ **

*

*

[pic] | COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels, 4.5.2005

COM(2005) 183 final

2005/0066 (ACC)

2005/0067 (ACC)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

on the signing of an Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation

(presented by the Commission)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1. The Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation (“the Parties”) on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment[1] entered into force on 1 June 2002.

2. With a view to further improving and simplifying the functioning of the Agreement, the Parties have decided to revise the Agreement in certain parts.

3. The revisions are intended to reduce the administrative burden related to the management of the agreement, to further facilitate trade, and to clarify and simplify the operation of the agreement.

4. In order to reduce administrative burden, Article 10 will be revised so that the Committee set up under the Agreement no longer needs to make formal Decisions to recognise, modify the scope of, or withdraw recognition of conformity assessment bodies in cases where the recognition, withdrawal or change in the scope of activity of the conformity assessment body has not been contested by the other Party. In cases where the recognition, withdrawal or change in the scope of activity of a conformity assessment body has been contested, a formal Decision will still be required.

5. New procedures are clearly set out in Article 11 for all possible courses of action related to the recognition, withdrawal of recognition, modification of the scope, and suspension of conformity assessment bodies.

6. A new paragraph will be added to Article 11 to clarify the situation regarding the validity of certificates issued by conformity assessment bodies whose recognition has been withdrawn.

7. The wording of Articles 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 has been changed to reflect the revisions to Articles 10 and 11.

8. Certain provisions in Article 6 that duplicate provisions in Article 11 have been deleted.

9. The reference in Article 8(2) to the Chairman of the Committee is erroneous as the Committee is co-chaired by the Parties and has therefore been deleted.

10. Article 2 refers to specified editions of the relevant ISO/IEC guides. In order to avoid the need to modify the Agreement each time a new edition of the ISO/IEC guide is produced, the specific reference has been deleted from Article 2 and replaced by a general reference to definitions laid down by ISO and IEC. The reference to the definitions laid down in European standards 45020 (1993 edition) is no longer valid and has therefore been deleted from Article 2.

11. An obligation to indicate possible suspensions of recognised conformity assessment bodies in the list of recognised conformity assessment bodies has been included in Article 8.

12. A requirement for designating authorities to use their best endeavours to ensure that recognised conformity assessment bodies co-operate in an appropriate way has been introduced into Article 9.

13. To facilitate trade, and to simplify the operation of the Agreement in cases where there may be doubts as to its applicability, the rule of origin in Article 4 has been abolished. The Agreement will apply to all products covered by it, irrespective of their origin.

14. In order to increase transparency in operation, an obligation to notify in writing any changes to relevant legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions has been added in Article 12.

15. There are no financial implications to this proposal, nor implications for SMEs.

16. The revised Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

In view of the need for these changes, it is desirable to adopt Decisions of the Council for the signature, and conclusion, of an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation revising the Agreement.

2005/0066 (ACC)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

on the signing of an Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300 (2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission[2],

Whereas:

(1) The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation.

(2) Subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, this Agreement initialled on 14 October 2004 should be signed ,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Subject to a possible conclusion at a later date, the President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to sign, on behalf of the European Community, the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation.

Done at Brussels,

For the Council

The President

2005/0067 (ACC)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300 (2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission[3],

Whereas:

(1) The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation;

(2) This Agreement has been signed, on behalf of the European Community, on [...] subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, in accordance with Decision .../.../EC of the Council of [...][4];

(3) This Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the revision of the Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to deposit on behalf of the European Community the act of approval provided for in Article 21 of the Agreement, in order to express the consent of the Community to be bound.

Done at Brussels,

For the Council

The President

ANNEX

AGREEMENT

revising the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment

THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE SWISS CONFEDERATION, hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”,

Having concluded an Agreement on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment (hereinafter referred to as “the Agreement”);

Whereas the Agreement entered into force on 1 June 2002;

Whereas there is a need to simplify the operation of the Agreement;

Whereas the Agreement in Articles 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 refers to conformity assessment bodies listed in Annex 1;

Whereas the Agreement in Article 2 refers to definitions laid down in the 1996 edition of ISO/IEC Guide 2 and in the 1993 edition of the European standard EN 45020;

Whereas the Agreement in Article 4 restricts the application of the Agreement to products that originate in the Parties according to non-preferential rules of origin;

Whereas the Agreement in Article 6 refers to the procedures set out in Article 11;

Whereas the Agreement in Article 8 refers to the Chairman of the Committee;

Whereas the Agreement in Article 9 refers to coordination and comparison work between conformity assessment bodies recognised under the Agreement;

Whereas the Agreement in Article 10 establishes a Committee that decides on the inclusion of conformity assessment bodies in Annex 1 and on their removal from Annex 1;

Whereas the Agreement in Article 11 sets out a procedure for the inclusion of conformity assessment bodies in Annex 1 and their removal from Annex 1;

Whereas the Agreement in Article 12 sets out obligations for information exchange;

Considering that in order to reflect the changes introduced to Article 11 of the Agreement, the term “conformity assessment bodies listed in Annex 1” should be deleted and replaced by a reference to the “recognised conformity assessment bodies” in the Articles 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11;

Considering that in order to avoid the need to modify the Agreement when changes are introduced to the definitions in the relevant ISO/IEC guides, the reference to specific editions of these guides should be deleted from Article 2 and replaced by a general reference to definitions laid down by ISO and IEC;

Considering that since the reference to the definitions laid down in European standards 45020 (1993 edition) is no longer valid, the reference should be deleted from Article 2;

Considering that in order to facilitate trade between the Parties, and to simplify the operation of the Agreement, the restriction to apply the Agreement to products that originate in the Parties should be deleted from Article 4;

Considering that in order to simplify the Agreement, certain provisions of Article 6 should be deleted in order to avoid duplication with corresponding provisions set out in Article 11;

Considering that in order to reflect that the Committee is co-chaired by the Parties, the reference to the Chairman of the Committee should be deleted from Article 8;

Considering that in order to facilitate trade between the Parties, and to ensure transparency in the operation of the Agreement, an obligation to indicate possible suspensions of recognised conformity assessment bodies in the list of recognised conformity assessment bodies should be included in Article 8;

Considering that in order to facilitate the functioning of the Agreement, the need for designating authorities to use their best endeavours to ensure that recognised conformity assessment bodies co-operate in an appropriate way should be included in Article 9;

Considering that in order to simplify the operation of the Agreement, the need for the Committee to take decisions on the recognition or withdrawal of recognition of conformity assessment bodies should be limited to cases that have been contested by the other Party should be included in Article 10;

Considering that in order to simplify the operation of the Agreement, a simpler procedure for the recognition, withdrawal of recognition, modification of the scope, and suspension of conformity assessment bodies should be set up in Article 11;

Considering that in order to increase transparency, an obligation to notify in writing changes related to relevant legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions as well as to designating authorities and competent authorities should be added in Article 12;

Have agreed to revise the Agreement as follows:

Article 1

Revisions to the Agreement

1. Article 1 is revised as follows:

(i) In paragraph 1, “bodies listed in Annex 1” is replaced by “bodies recognised in accordance with the procedures of this Agreement” (hereinafter “recognised conformity assessment bodies”).

(ii) In paragraph 2, “the bodies listed in Annex 1” is replaced by “recognised conformity assessment bodies”.

2. Article 2 (2) is replaced by the following:

“The definitions laid down by ISO and IEC may be used to establish the meaning of the general terms relating to conformity assessment contained in this Agreement.”

3. Article 4 is replaced by the following:

“Article 4

Origin

The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to products covered by this Agreement irrespective of their origin.”

4. Article 5 is replaced by the following:

“Article 5

Recognised conformity assessment bodies

The Parties hereby agree that conformity assessment bodies recognised in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 11 fulfil the conditions of eligibility to assess conformity.”

5. Article 6 is replaced by the following:

“Article 6

Designating authorities

1. The Parties hereby undertake to ensure that their designating authorities have the necessary power and competence to designate conformity assessment bodies or withdraw designation, suspend or remove suspension of designated conformity assessment bodies under their respective jurisdiction.

2. For the designation of conformity assessment bodies, the designating authorities shall observe the general principles for designation set out in Annex 2, subject to the provisions of the respective section IV in Annex 1. These designating authorities shall observe the same principles when withdrawing designation, suspending or removing suspension.”

6. Article 7 is revised as follows:

In paragraph 1, “the conformity assessment bodies under their jurisdiction listed in Annex 1” is replaced by “recognised conformity assessment bodies under their jurisdiction”.

7. Article 8 is revised as follows:

(i) In paragraph 1, first subparagraph, “listed in Annex 1” is replaced by “of recognised conformity assessment bodies”.

(ii) In paragraph 1, second subparagraph, the text “and to the Chairman of the Committee” is deleted.

(iii) In paragraph 4, a new sentence: “Such suspension shall be indicated in the common list of recognised conformity assessment bodies referred to in Annex 1.” is added after the first sentence.

8. Article 9 is revised as follows:

(i) In paragraph 2, “conformity assessment bodies under their jurisdiction listed in Annex 1” is replaced by “recognised conformity assessment bodies under their jurisdiction”.

(ii) In paragraph 3, “The conformity assessment bodies listed in Annex 1” is replaced by “The recognised conformity assessment bodies”, and the following sentence is added after the first sentence: “The designating authorities shall use their best endeavours to ensure that recognised conformity assessment bodies co-operate in an appropriate way.”

9. Article 10 paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:

“4. The Committee may consider any matter related to this Agreement. In particular, it shall be responsible for:

(a) drawing up the procedure for carrying out the verifications provided for in Article 7;

(b) drawing up the procedure for carrying out the verifications provided for in Article 8;

(c) deciding on the recognition of conformity assessment bodies contested under Article 8;

(d) deciding on the withdrawal of recognition of recognised conformity assessment bodies contested under Article 8;

(e) examining any legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions notified by one Party to another pursuant to Article 12 in order to assess their repercussions on the Agreement and to amend the appropriate sections in Annex 1.”

10. Article 11 is replaced by the following:

“Article 11

Recognition, withdrawal of recognition, modification of the scope, and suspension of conformity assessment bodies

1. The following procedure shall apply for the recognition of conformity assessment bodies in relation to the requirements set out in the relevant Chapters of Annex 1:

(a) A Party wishing to have recognised any conformity assessment body shall notify the other Party in writing of its proposal, to that effect, adding the appropriate information to its request.

(b) If the other Party agrees to the proposal or raises no objection within 60 days of the notification of the proposal, the conformity assessment body shall be considered to be a recognised conformity assessment body under the terms of Article 5.

(c) If the other Party raises objections in writing within that 60-day period, Article 8 shall apply.

2. A Party can withdraw or suspend the recognition or remove the suspension of recognition of a conformity assessment body under its jurisdiction. The Party concerned shall immediately notify the other Party of its decision in writing, together with the date of such decision. The withdrawal, suspension, or removal of suspension shall take effect at that date. Such withdrawal or suspension shall be indicated in the common list of recognised conformity assessment bodies referred to in Annex 1.

3. A Party can propose that the scope of activity of a recognised conformity assessment body under its jurisdiction be amended. For scope extensions and scope reductions the procedures provided for in Article 11 (1) and 11 (2) respectively shall apply.

4. A Party can, in exceptional circumstances, contest the technical competence of a recognised conformity assessment body under the jurisdiction of the other Party. In this case Article 8 shall apply.

5. Reports, certificates, authorisation and conformity marks issued by a conformity assessment body after the date at which its recognition has been withdrawn or suspended need not be recognised by the Parties. Reports, certificates, authorisations and conformity marks issued by a conformity assessment body before the date its recognition has been withdrawn shall continue to be recognised by the Parties unless the responsible designating authority has limited or cancelled their validity. The Party under whose jurisdiction the responsible designating authority is operating shall notify the other Party in writing of any such changes relating to a limitation or cancellation of validity.”

11. Article 12 is revised as follows:

(i) In paragraph 2, “in writing” shall be added after “and shall notify”.

(ii) A paragraph 2a is inserted after paragraph 2: “Each Party shall notify changes to its designating authorities and competent authorities to the other Party in writing.”

Article 2

Entry into force

This Agreement shall be ratified or approved by the Parties in accordance with their own procedures. It shall enter into force on the first day of the second month following the date on which the Parties have exchanged diplomatic notes confirming the completion of their respective procedures for adoption of this Agreement .

Article 3

Languages

1. This Agreement is drawn up in two originals in the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish languages, each text being equally authentic.

2. This Agreement and the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment will as soon as possible be translated into the Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak and Slovene languages. The Committee is empowered to approve these language versions. Once approved, the versions in these languages shall also be authentic, in the same way as for the languages referred to in paragraph 1.

On behalf of the Swiss Confederation | On behalf of the European Community |

Signed in Bern on | Signed in Brussels on |

[1] 2002/309/EC, Euratom; OJ L114/1, 30.04.2002

[2] OJ C [...], [...], p.[...].

[3] OJ C [...], [...], p.[...].

[4] OJ L [...], [...], p. [...].