alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 188 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 

the deduction for certain taxes, including State and local property and 

income taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mr. KING of New York) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the limitation on the deduction for certain taxes, including State and local property and income taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Access to 

5 Lower Taxes by ensuring Deductibility Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘SALT Deductibility Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 188 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR STATE 

2 AND LOCAL, ETC. TAXES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph 

5 (6). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

8 11042 of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

l0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138574 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138574 

 COA: 289420 

Saginaw CC: 06-028461-FH 

JOHNNIE PATTERSON, III, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 4, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1.  Republic Bancorp, Inc.*, Owosso, Michigan; to acquire NetBank, Inc., Alpharetta, Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire NetBank, Alpharetta, Georgia, and NetBank Partners, LLC, Alpharetta, Georgia, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y, and in management consulting and counseling activities, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(9)(i)(A)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 7, 2001.

Jennifer J. Johnson

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-11873 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# CE2010184EN.01021301.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/213 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/213

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Reporting and documentation requirements in the case of mergers and divisions ***I

P6_TA(2009)0250

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 77/91/EEC, 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC and Directive 2005/56/EC as regards reporting and documentation requirements in the case of merger and divisions (COM(2008)0576 – C6-0330/2008 – 2008/0182(COD))

2010/C 184 E/56

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0576),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 44(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0330/2008),

having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 7 April 2009 to adopt the proposal as amended, in accordance with the first indent in the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0247/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0182

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 22 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 77/91/EEC, 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC, and Directive 2005/56/EC as regards reporting and documentation requirements in the case of mergers and divisions

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/109/EC.)

---
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 26 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 26 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Building Materials Holding
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ellis C. Goebel, Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Ellis C. Goebel
---------------------
Ellis C. Goebel
Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 9, 2002






                                       21
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 21 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 21 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 20130 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DERRICK ERVIN

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 430

- 1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derrick Ervin has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Ervin has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Ervin ’ s

response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 9, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-20130 Document: 00515228625 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2019No. 19

- 20130

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-20130 Document: 00515228625 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/09/2019
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05857-JCF Document 1 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 12 of 12
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bernard Briskin, Chief Executive Officer of Arden Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Company),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended January 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ BERNARD BRISKINName:
    
    Bernard BriskinTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    March 14, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
RECEIVED

CEE,

crest rg ST OM cmeé

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

20 South Wacker Drive 312/930,1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax
www.cme.com

September 18, 2006

Ms. Eileen Donovan

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21* Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: — Section Sc(c)(1) and Regulation Section 40.6. Certification of Normalizing Constant for
October 2006 Goldman Sachs Commodity Index. CME Submission #06-79.

Dear Ms. Donovan:

On September 7, 2006 Goldman Sachs set the Normalizing Constant to be used for settlement of
the October 2006 GSCI Futures and Options contracts. CME hereby notifies the Commission
that the October 2006 Normalizing Constant is 5675.060 The Exchange will notify the
Commission when Goldman Sachs sets the Normalizing Constants for the November 2006 and
subsequent contract months.

The Exchange certifies that these actions comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
rules thereunder.

If you have any questions regarding this submission, please contact Mr. Paul Peterson at (312)
930-4587 or via e-mail at ppetcrso@cme.com . Please refer to CME Submission #06-79 in all

correspondence regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development
(82 South. 893)

#### Ex parte BENJAMIN.

(3 Div. 413.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 26, 1919.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Tilley & Elmore and Brassell & Brassell, all of Montgomery, for appellant.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Horace Wilkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MAYFIELD, J.

Petition of Zach Benjamin for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of the said court affirming the case of Zach Benjamin v. State of Alabama, 81 South. 855. Writ denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 791 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 791

   To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from limiting the 
  amount of Urban Area Security Initiative or State Homeland Security 
Grant Program grant funds that may be used to pay salaries or overtime 
 pay of law enforcement officials engaged in antiterrorism activities, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2009

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from limiting the 
  amount of Urban Area Security Initiative or State Homeland Security 
Grant Program grant funds that may be used to pay salaries or overtime 
 pay of law enforcement officials engaged in antiterrorism activities, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responder Funding 
Modernization Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. USE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS FOR SALARIES OR OVERTIME 
              PAY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS ENGAGED IN ANTITERRORISM 
              ACTIVITIES.

    (a) Limitation on Use Prohibited.--The Department of Homeland 
Security may not limit the amount of covered grant funds that may be 
used to pay salaries or overtime pay of law enforcement officials 
engaged in antiterrorism activities.
    (b) Treatment in Ranking Proposed Uses.--In evaluating the 
anticipated effectiveness of proposed uses of covered grant funds for 
purposes of determining eligibility for or the amount of a covered 
grant, the Department of Homeland Security (including any peer reviewer 
acting on behalf of the Department) shall treat a proposed use for 
salaries and overtime pay of law enforcement officials engaged in 
antiterrorism activities as at least as effective as all other proposed 
uses.
    (c) Covered Grant Funds Defined.--In this section the term 
``covered grant funds'' means grant funds provided under the Urban Area 
Security Initiative or the State Homeland Security Grant Program.
    (d) Application.--This section shall not apply with respect to any 
grant awarded before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Brian J. Recatto, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 8, 2008



/s/ Brian J. RecattoBrian J. RecattoChief Executive Officer




33
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22

- 0451

__________________________________________________________________ STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. JOHN DAVID PANASUK, Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER

__________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED th at Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 6 , 2023 within which to prepare, file and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2023

08/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0451
# CE2011351EN.01019301.xml

| 2.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 351/193 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 351/193

---

Wednesday 7 July 2010Industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (recast) ***II

P7_TA(2010)0267

European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 July 2010 on the Council position at first reading for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (recast) (11962/2/2009 – C7-0034/2010 – 2007/0286(COD))

2011/C 351 E/33

(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council position at first reading (11962/2/2009 – C7-0034/2010),

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0844),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0002/2008),

having regard to the Commission Communication to Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures’ (COM(2009)0665),

having regard to Article 294(7) and Article 192(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to its position at first reading (1),

1

having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 14 January 2009 (2),

2

having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 9 October 2008 (3),

3

having regard to Rule 66 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0145/2010),

| 1. | Adopts its position at second reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts its position at second reading hereinafter set out;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

(1)  OJ C 87 E, 1.4.2010, p. 191.

1

(2)  OJ C 182, 4.8.2009, p. 46.

2

(3)  OJ C 325, 19.12.2008, p. 60.

3

---

Wednesday 7 July 2010P7_TC2-COD(2007)0286

Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 7 July 2010 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2010/.../EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (Recast)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2010/75/EU)

---
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
  
 Initial Equity Grant. Each newly appointed or elected non-employee director is granted, pursuant to the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan or 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, a number of unrestricted shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) having a valuation equal to approximately $90,000, valued at the per share closing price of the Common Stock as of the
effective date of such director’s appointment or election. 
  
 Annual Equity Grant. At the Board’s first regularly scheduled meeting of each year, each non-employee director is granted shares of Common Stock having a valuation equal to $85,000, valued at the per share closing
price of the Common Stock as of the date of such first Board meeting. 
  
 Retainer and Fees. Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $20,000 (plus an additional $10,000 for the Audit Committee chairman and an additional $5,000 for each other Board committee chairman) paid quarterly
and reimbursement of reasonable incidental expenses. Each non-employee director also receives $1,500 for attendance at each Board meeting held “in person” and $1,000 for attendance at each Board meeting held by conference call. In
addition, each non-employee director receives $1,500 for each Board committee meeting attended (plus, in the case of a Board committee chairman, an additional $1,000 for each committee meeting after the fourth such meeting in any given year).

  
 Other Benefits. Each non-employee director is
eligible to participate, at such director’s cost and election, in the Company’s medical and dental plans. 
  
 Employee Directors. A director who is also an employee of the Company receives no additional compensation for services as a director.