alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 10 of 10
**Exhibit      21.1**

| **ENTITY**                                         | **JURISDICTION** |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                               |             |
| Embark                Corp.                        | Delaware         |
| Embark                Online, Inc.                 | Delaware         |
| Goto                College Holdings, Inc.         | Delaware         |
| MRU                ABS LLC                         | Delaware         |
| MRU                ABS II LLC                      | Delaware         |
| MRU                Funding SPV Inc.                | Delaware         |
| MRU                Lending, Inc.                   | Delaware         |
| MRU                Lending Holdco, LLC             | Delaware         |
| MRU                Originations, Inc.              | Delaware         |
| MRU                Universal Guaranty Agency, Inc. | Delaware         |
| Student                Services SPV, Inc.          | Delaware         |
| Education                Empowerment Funding, LLC  | Delaware         |
| Iempower,                Inc.                      | Delaware         |

----
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1  STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

In accordance with the disclosure requirements of SFAS 128, a reconciliation of
the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted EPS is provided below.

             (Unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended                 Six Months Ended
                                           -------------------------------    -------------------------------
Numerator - Basic and Diluted EPS:         June 30, 2000     June 30, 1999    June 30, 2000     June 30, 1999
                                           -------------     -------------    -------------     -------------
<S>                                        <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>
  Net income (loss)                          $ (1,235)         $    480         $ (5,109)         $ (3,186)
Denominator - Basic EPS:
  Common stock outstanding                     34,216            33,191           34,088            33,144
                                             --------          --------         --------          --------
Basic income (loss) per share                $  (0.04)         $   0.01         $  (0.15)         $  (0.10)
                                             ========          ========         ========          ========

Denominator - Diluted EPS:
  Denominator - basic EPS                      34,216            33,191           34,088            33,144
Effect of dilutive securities
  Common stock options                             --               995               --                --
                                             --------          --------         --------          --------
Diluted shares outstanding                     34,216            34,186           34,088            33,144
                                             --------          --------         --------          --------
Diluted income (loss) per share              $  (0.04)         $   0.01         $  (0.15)         $  (0.10)
                                             ========          ========         ========          ========
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Pamela Fredette, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of enherent Corp., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of enherent Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Pamela Fredette     Pamela Fredette     Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President  August 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 31.2


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Kevin K. Nanke certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report of Amber Resources Company of
Colorado;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

         (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date:  September 29, 2003


/s/ Kevin K. Nanke
Kevin K. Nanke
Chief Financial Officer
---

EXHIBIT 7

CERTIFICATION UNDERSECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Catalyst Paper
Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Russell J. Horner, Chief Executive
Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|A. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|B. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Russell
      Horner                | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Russell J. Horner                     | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                      | 
|February 3, 2006                      | 

---
Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05342-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH     Document 21      Filed 09/12/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH     Document 21      Filed 09/12/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH     Document 21      Filed 09/12/2007     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gus JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-2536.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 19, 2013.

Decided: May 6, 2013.

Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Hurt v. Johnson,*No. 8:12-cv-03280-PJM (D.Md. Nov. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00102-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court has considered Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion 

that the case should be set for submission without oral argument. A submission date has not yet 

been determined. The parties will be provided with advanced notice of the setting. See 

Tex.R.App.P. 39.8

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of November, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-4 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 17-4 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1302-000]


American Ref-Fuel Company of Niagara, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of 
Order

May 3, 2001.
    American Ref-Fuel Company of Niagara, L.P. (American Reg-Fuel) 
submitted for filing a rate schedule under which American Ref-Fuel will 
engage in wholesale electric power and energy transactions at market-
based rates. American Ref-Fuel also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, American Ref-Fuel also requested 
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by American 
Ref-Fuel.
    On April 12, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by American Ref-Fuel should file a motion 
to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
American Ref-Fuel is authorized to issue securities and assume 
obligations or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or 
otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided that 
such issuance or assumption is for some lawful object within the 
corporate purposes of the applicant, and compatible with the public 
interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of American Ref-Fuel's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 14, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11659 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending February 29, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Jay Lutsky, Principal Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Jay Lutsky



 Jay Lutsky,

 Principal Executive Officer and Director

May 27, 2004
Clear All

        25 March 2021    

#                     Iwo Jima ARG and 24th MEU Deploy After Redefining Integrated Training                 

                The Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) deployed March 25 after completing an intensive, month-long composite training exercise (COMPTUEX) and brief in-port maintenance period.            

        19 February 2021    

#                     USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Deploys Upon Completion of Historic COMPTUEX                 

                The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) and the ships and aircraft of Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 2, the Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (IKE CSG), departed for deployment Feb. 18, after successfully completing a historic Composite Unit Training Exercise (COMPTUEX), that            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jean Claude Clermont, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered February 17, 1988, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*756Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court’s instruction to the jury to continue its deliberations was coercive. This issue is not preserved for review since the defense counsel consented to the instruction. In any event, the language of the instruction was neutral and could not reasonably be considered coercive *(see, People v Pagan,*45 NY2d 725; *People v Eley,*121 AD2d 462; *People v Carosella,*118 AD2d 865).

Similarly, the defendant’s contention that the court’s charge on justification failed to adequately inform the jury of the People’s burden of proof is unpreserved for review. In any event, the charge as given does not require reversal.

Finally, the sentence imposed was not excessive. Rubin, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### THE THELMA.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 9, 1923.)

No. 239.

Collision <©==>125—Evidence warranting decree for libelant.

Conflicting evidence as to the circumstances of collision between two motorboats *held,*to warrant a decree for libelant.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Libel in admiralty by Frederick J. Keller against the gasoline launch Thelma, her engines, etc.; Antonio Cappadona and another, claimants. Decree for libelant, and claimants appeal.

Affirmed.

tgsaFor other eases see same topic *&*KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes

*808Foley & Martin, of New York City (James A. Martin and George V A. McCloskey, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Harry D. Thirkield, of New York City, for appellee.

Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal raises no question of law. The witnesses were very few in number, and were all seen and heard by the trial judge. The case for appellants rests upon a story the substance of which is this:

On a morning which had been foggy, but when 'the range of visibility was 500 or 600 feet, libelant’s motorboat approached the motorboat of claimants on a course approximately 100 feet to port. The position was one of perfect safety, the speed of libelant’s boat between 5 and 7 miles an hour, and then, when 20 to 30 feet ahead of a line across the bow of claimants’ boat, libelant’s vessel suddenly turned, so as to cross claimants’ bow.

Such matter as this is decided quite as much by the quality as by the quantity of evidence, and probability and credibility are most important factors. The trial judge did not believe this story, and did believe the much simpler tale told by the fewer witnesses for libelant. Having read the record, we are not in the least disposed to vary the decree below, which is affirmed, with costs.
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 21 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 21 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 15-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 15-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 15-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 15-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 15-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 5 of 5