alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kelvin A. CANADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Walter DAVIS; Sgt. William Wright; Sgt. Paul Payne; Capt. Dewayne Turner, Defendants-Appellees, and Head Nurse Vicki Phipps; Dr. Timothy Mcbride; Nurse M. Scott, Defendants.

No. 13-6193.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: April 30, 2013.

Kelvin A. Canada, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin A. Canada appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Canada v. Davis,*No. 7:11-cv-00569-SGW-PMS, 2013 WL 350335 (W.D.Va. Jan. 29, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Buzz Media,
      Ltd. for the quarter ended November 30, 2007, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Buzz Media, Ltd. for the quarter
              ended
              November 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended November 30, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of Buzz Media,
              Ltd..
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Tiffany WalshName:
            Tiffany
                WalshTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            January
                14, 2008
Order entered June 28, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-19-00634-CV

IN RE SANDRA CRENSHAW, Relator

Original Proceeding from Dallas County, Texas



### ORDER Before Justices Brown, S chenck, and Reichek

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this proceeding for want of

jurisdiction.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE
     30, 1999 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           39,117
<SECURITIES>                                    180,757
<RECEIVABLES>                                    80,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                300,434
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  300,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           218,050
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        263,379
<OTHER-SE>                                     (180,995)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    300,434
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 23,185
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (14,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14,261
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (14,261)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.80)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
Portage Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine months ended February 29,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Martine Caron, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:
April 4, 2008








MARTINE
CARON


Martine
Caron


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director











-1-
Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 5 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 5 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 5 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 5 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 5 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 5 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 5 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 7 of 7
Sparacino failed to object to do not rise to the level of plain error. Before

imposing sentence, the district court disclaimed reliance upon all statements which fell outside the scope of NRS 176.015(3). See Buschauer, 106 Nev. at 893, 804 P.2d at 1048. For these reasons, Sparacino fails to demonstrate that the district court violated his right to due process, see id. at 893-94, 804 P.2d at 1048, or abused its discretion at sentencing, see Randell, 109 Nev. at 8, 846 P.2d at 280; Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976) (a district court abuses its discretion if it bases its sentencing determination only upon impalpable or highly suspect evidence). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

k C) i J. Pickering

J. Parraguirre

Saitta
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney State Public Defender Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
kO) 1917A 

### e
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Megadata Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
T. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            By: /s/ James T. Barry
                                                ----------------------
                                                James T. Barry
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                January 29, 2008
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Missouri River Flooding      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Heavy snowfall and frigid temperatures in the Midwestern United States were followed by a late winter storm in mid-March of 2019. The combined effect produced heavy flooding along the Missouri River and its tributaries throughout Nebraska and Iowa.

The Landsat and Sentinel satellites, whose data is housed at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center near Sioux Falls, SD, each captured clear views of the flooding on March 16, 2019.

Show only leftShow only right

View Media Details

Download Images

Show only leftShow only right

View Media Details

Download Images

 

Show only leftShow only right

View Media Details

Download Images

Satellite imagery archived by USGS EROS is available to download at no cost through earthexplorer.usgs.gov, landsatlook.usgs.gov, and glovis.usgs.gov.

## Related Content

                  -              Multimedia           

Kandahar - March 3, 2019

Flash Floods Soak Kandahar

Kandahar - March 3, 2019Kandahar - March 3, 2019

October 15, 2021

#### Flash Floods Soak Kandahar

link

Nearly four inches of rain in 30 hours drenched the second-largest city in Afghanistan at the beginning of March, causing flash floods that killed at least 20 people, collapsed homes and swept away moving vehicles.

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

Kandahar - March 3, 2019Kandahar - March 3, 2019

October 15, 2021

#### Flash Floods Soak Kandahar

link

#### Flash Floods Soak Kandahar

link

Nearly four inches of rain in 30 hours drenched the second-largest city in Afghanistan at the beginning of March, causing flash floods that killed at least 20 people, collapsed homes and swept away moving vehicles.

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Related Content

Kandahar - March 3, 2019

Flash Floods Soak Kandahar

Kandahar - March 3, 2019Kandahar - March 3, 2019

October 15, 2021

#### Flash Floods Soak Kandahar

link

Nearly four inches of rain in 30 hours drenched the second-largest city in Afghanistan at the beginning of March, causing flash floods that killed at least 20 people, collapsed homes and swept away moving vehicles.

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

Kandahar - March 3, 2019Kandahar - March 3, 2019

October 15, 2021

#### Flash Floods Soak Kandahar

link

#### Flash Floods Soak Kandahar

link

Nearly four inches of rain in 30 hours drenched the second-largest city in Afghanistan at the beginning of March, causing flash floods that killed at least 20 people, collapsed homes and swept away moving vehicles.

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

### Contacts
# C_2009289EN.01000301.xml

| 28.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/3

---

Communication in accordance with Article 12(5)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, on the information provided by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature

2009/C 289/02

Binding Tariff Information ceases to be valid from this day if it becomes incompatible with the interpretation of the customs nomenclature as a result of the following international tariff measures:

Amendments to the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes and the Compendium of Classification Opinions, approved by the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC doc. NC1443 — report of the 43rd Session of the HS Committee):

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO BE DONE UNDER ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE OF THE HS CONVENTION AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS EDITED BY THE HS COMMITTEE OF THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO BE DONE UNDER ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE OF THE HS CONVENTION AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS EDITED BY THE HS COMMITTEE OF THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION

(43rd SESSION OF THE HSC IN MARCH 2009)

DOC. NC1443

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

| 09.02 | P/20 |
| --- | --- |
| 14.01 | P/23 |
| 39.07 | P/23 |
| Chapter 41 General Explanatory Note | P/13 |
| 63.02 | P/23 |
| 70.20 | P/23 |
| 71.01 | P/23 |
| Chapter 84 General Explanatory Note | P/23 |
| 84.15 | P/21 |
| 84.42 | P/23 |
| 84.71 | P/23 |
| 85.08 | P/17 |
| 85.19 | P/23 |
| 85.21 | P/23 |
| 85.25 | P/23 |
| 85.27 | P/23 |
| 85.42 | P/23 |
| 91.11 | P/8 |

09.02

P/20

14.01

P/23

39.07

P/23

Chapter 41 General Explanatory Note

P/13

63.02

P/23

70.20

P/23

71.01

P/23

Chapter 84 General Explanatory Note

P/23

84.15

P/21

84.42

P/23

84.71

P/23

85.08

P/17

85.19

P/23

85.21

P/23

85.25

P/23

85.27

P/23

85.42

P/23

91.11

P/8

Classification Opinions approved by the HS Committee

Classification Opinions approved by the HS Committee

| 21.06 | P/9, P/10 |
| --- | --- |
| 32.03 | P/22 |
| 32.14 | P/11 |
| 35.06 | P/12 |
| 84.15 | P/15 |
| 84.51 | P/16 |
| 85.25 | P/22 |
| 85.29 | P/22 |
| 87.04 | P/18 |
| 96.02 | P/22 |

21.06

P/9, P/10

32.03

P/22

32.14

P/11

35.06

P/12

84.15

P/15

84.51

P/16

85.25

P/22

85.29

P/22

87.04

P/18

96.02

P/22

Information regarding the contents of these measures can be obtained from the Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union of the European Commission (rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË) or can be downloaded from the internet site of this Directorate-General:

http://ec.europa.eu/comm/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/harmonised_system/index_en.htm

---
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 21st day of October, 2014, the 

cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

ERRINGTON CHARLES HATCH, JR., 

Appellant

No. 05-13-00895-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 4, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F08-60670-K.

Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. 

Justices FitzGerald and Fillmore 

participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

MODIFIED as follows:

We STRIKE Justin Lord as the “Attorney for State” and MODIFY the judgment by 

adding George B. Lewis, II as the attorney for the State.

We STRIKE “TRUE” as being appellant Errington Charles Hatch, Jr.’s “Plea to Motion 

to Adjudicate” and MODIFY the judgment by adding “NOT TRUE” as Hatch’s “Plea to Motion 

to Adjudicate.” 

We STRIKE “OPEN PLEA” as the “Terms of Plea Bargain” and MODIFY the 

judgment by adding “NONE” as the “Terms of Plea Bargain.” 

As modified, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.
WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 31st day of December, 2014.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Rent-A-Center East, Inc., and Rent Way, Inc., 

Petitioners, 

v. 

South Carolina Department of Revenue, Respondent. 

Appellate Case No. 2019-000670 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from the Administrative Law Court 

Harold W. Funderburk Jr., Administrative Law Judge 

Opinion No. 27946 

Heard February 12, 2020 – Filed February 19, 2020 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

John C. von Lehe Jr. and Bryson M. Geer, both of Nelson 

Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Charleston, for 

Petitioners. 

Sean G. Ryan and Jason P. Luther, both of South 

Carolina Department of Revenue, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' 

decision in Rent-A-Center East, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue, 

425 S.C. 582, 824 S.E.2d 217 (Ct. App. 2019). We now dismiss the writ as 
improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.2


VICTORIA LAKE PROPERTY AMENDING AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT made the 29th day of April 2004.




BETWEEN:

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATION, of Suite 888 – 1100 Melville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4A6




(the “Optionor”)

AND:

CROSSHAIR EXPLORATION & MINING CORP. (Formerly “International Lima Resources Corp.”), of Suite 2300, 1066 West Hasting Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 3X2.




(“Crosshair”)




WHEREAS:




1.

The Optionor and Crosshair entered into an agreement dated February 14, 2003. (the “Original Agreement”).




2.

The Optionor and Crosshair desires to clarify Section 10 - Area of Interest of the Original Agreement by including the following:




“Section 10.1




The acquiring party shall offer the property within 30 days of formal acquisition to the other party in writing for inclusion in the Property and the other party shall have thirty (30) days from the date of written notice by the acquiring party to accept the acquired property for inclusion in the property.  For greater certainty, if the other party does not accept the offer in writing within thirty (30) days, the other party shall be deemed not to have accepted the inclusion of the acquired property for inclusion into the Property.




Formal acquisition shall be the issuance date of a licence or licences for a staking application or the date when an option agreement is fully executed.”




IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.




	 	)

	 
	THE COMMON SEAL OF

RUBICON MINERALS CORPORATION

was hereunto affixed in the presence of:
















__________________________________________________

Authorized Signatory

	)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

	

















C/S


	 	 	 





	 	)

	 
	THE COMMON SEAL OF

CROSSHAIR EXPLORATION & MINING CORP.

was hereunto affixed in the presence of:
















__________________________________________________

Authorized Signatory

	)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

	

















C/S
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 1, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

In the

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

_______________

m 04-10670

_______________

BERNARD FICQ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED,

A DELAWARE CORPORATION;

THOMAS J. ENGIBOUS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, PRESIDENT, AND

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC.;

RICHARD K. TEMPLETON,

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF

OPERATING OFFICER OF TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED, AND PRESIDENT OF THE

SEMICONDUCTOR GROUP OF TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

m 3:02-CV-1273-D

_________________________
2

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS,

Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Proceeding pro se, Bernard Ficq alleges

only two federal claims against his former employer, Texas Instruments, Inc., and two of its

officers: intentional discrimination under 42

U.S.C. § 1981 and conspiracyunder 42 U.S.C.

§ 1985. He claims he was unlawfully terminated on the basis of his “status as a U.S.

citizen.”

Based on the thorough findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the

district court dismissed Ficq’s federal claims

with prejudice and his state claims without

prejudice. The judgment of dismissal is

AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given

by the magistrate judge.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
April 18, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2664.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of December 2008 Wheat and mini-sized Wheat futures.

These futures contracts ordinarily would be authorized for trading in July 2006. Due to customer
demand, the Exchange intends to list these contracts earlier than usual (i.e., as of April 19, 2006).

This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.
There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
#### GAINES *v.*KNECHT.

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 52.

Argued December 11, 1908.

Decided December 14, 1908.

Writ of error to review decision of Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia on appeal from Commissioner of Patents, 27 App. D. C. 530, dismissed on authority of *Frasch*v. *Moore,*211 U. S. 1.

*562
      *Mr. James L. Hopkins, Mr. Daniel W. Lindsey*and *Mr. Alfred, A. Eicks*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Arthur E. Wallace*for defendant in error.

*Per Curiam:*

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. *Frasch*v. *Moore,*211 U. S. 1. See act of February 20,1905, for the registration of trade-marks, C. 592, 33 Stat. 724, §§ 9, 16, 17, 18, *et passim.*

[The headnote in *Frasch*v. *Moore*also appears as a note to *Atkins*v. *Moore, ante,*p. 285; and see *ante,*p. 290, for reference to point decided in *Gaines*v. *Knecht.]*
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC     Document 6      Filed 09/28/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC     Document 6      Filed 09/28/2007     Page 2 of 2