alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
cmeé

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

20 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-7499

312/930.1000 tel
312/466.4410 fax

www.cme.com

November 3, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Section 5c(c)(1), Part 40.6 - Amendments to the TRAKRs No Bust Range.
CME Submission# 05-116.

Dear Ms. Webb:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (““CME” or “Exchange”) hereby notifies the Commission of
Amendments to the no bust range for all TRAKRs contracts as approved by Staff, per delegate authority.

The Exchange certifies that these amendments comply with the Act and rules thereunder.

It has been determined that the no bust range on all of the TRAKRs contracts is too narrow given
the bid ask spread. Currently, the no bust range is at 0.10 cents with a price band of 0.30 cents. The bid
ask spreads currently are in the 0.30 cent range. In order to correct this problem, the no bust range and
the price banding will be widened to 0.25 cents and $1.00 respectively. These amendments are to
become effective on November 6, 2005. Amendments follow below with additions underlined and
deletions bracketed and struck out.

If you require any additional information regarding this action, please do not hesitate to contact
Ms. Ariel Hantin, Senior Research Analyst at 312-559-4951 or via e-mail at ahantin@cme.com. Please
teference our CME Submission #05-116 on all future correspondence regarding this notification.


Amendments to TRAKRs No Bust Range
November 3, 2005
Page 2 of 3

Sincerely,

hc
AE

John W, Labuszewski, Director
Research & Product Development

ce: Mr. Thomas M. Leahy and Mr. Steven B. Benton
CFTC Division of Market Oversight, Product Review & Analysis Section



Amendments to TRAKRs No Bust Range
November 3, 2005
Page 3 of 3

Text of Rule Amendments
(Additions are underlined, deletions are bracketed and overstruck.)

588.K. GLOBEX No Bust Ranges

Previous rules remain unchanged.

S&P 500 Financial SPCTR 3.00 index points or less
TRAKRS Futures [48] 25 cents or less
Goldman Sachs Commodity Index 2.50 index points or less

Remaining rules remain unchanged.

Clean Copy of Rule Amendments

588.K. GLOBEX No Bust Ranges

Previous rules remain unchanged.

S&P 500 Financial SPCTR 3.00 index points or less
TRAKRS Futures 25 cents or less
Goldman Sachs Commodity Index 2.50 index points or less

Remaining rules remain unchanged.
(84 South. 924)

#### Ex parte COLLINS.

(5 Div. 732.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 30, 1919.)

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals.

Strother & Hines, of La Fayette, for appellant.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MAYFIELD, J.

Petition of Antny Collins for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court, rendered in the case of Antny Collins v. State, 84 South. 417. Writ denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does
hereby certify that the foregoing Quarterly Report of Claimsnet.com inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the
"Report"):

(1)      Fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      Fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
         condition and consolidated result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Don Crosbie
-----------------------------------
Don Crosbie
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 19, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FELIPE LACKEY RANGEL,

 Appellant,

v.

NPG OF TEXAS, L.P. d/b/a KVIA TV

CHANNEL 7 ABC,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-09-00056-CV

Appeal from

 County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2005-4619)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Felipe Lackey Rangel’s motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant

to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1) because Rangel no longer wishes to prosecute the appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. Costs are assessed against Appellant. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d).

November 24, 2009 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 10 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### Jeff CORR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-2438.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 26, 2013.

Decided: May 2, 2013.

Jeff Corr, Appellant pro se. J. Christopher Krivonyak, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

*212Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeff Corr appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the Bureau of the Public Debt’s motion for summary judgment, and denying Corr’s motion for summary judgment. We deny the Bureau of the Public Debt’s motions to stay the briefing schedule and dismiss the appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Corr v. Bureau of the Pub. Debt,*No. 6:11-cv-00865, 2012 WL 4464038 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12044]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 2

[FRL-6978-6]


Public Information and Confidentiality: Advance Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 21, 2000 (65 FR 80394), EPA published an advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) regarding potential revision of 
the confidential business information (CBI). EPA is reopening the 
comment period in order to afford the public the opportunity to provide 
additional comments concerning the ANPRM. The comment period will close 
on June 13, 2001. We believe it is necessary to reopen the comment 
period as a courtesy to the public in response to public requests for 
additional time to consolidate comments on the proposal following the 
public meeting held on March 7, 2001.

DATES: EPA must receive comments on the ANPRM by June 13, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted (in duplicate if 
possible) to Docket Number EC-2000-004, Enforcement and Compliance 
Docket and Information Center (ECDIC), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Room 4033, Mail Code 2201A, 
Washington, DC 20460; Phone, 202-564-2614 or 202-564-2119; Fax, 202-
501-1011 E-Mail, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3c7ccc0c8c6d78dccc6c0c2e3c6d3c28dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="31555e525a54451f5e545250715441501f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>. Documents related to this advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking are available for public inspection and 
viewing by contacting the ECDIC at this same address. The ECDIC is open 
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal 
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Margolis, Office of Information 
Collection, Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Mail Code 2822, 
Washington, DC 20460; Phone, 202-260-9329; Fax, 202-401-4544; Email, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d9b4b8abbeb6b5b0aaf7b8b5b8b799bca9b8f7beb6af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f525e4d585053564c115e535e517f5a4f5e11585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 7, 2001.
Margaret N. Schneider,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Environmental Information.
[FR Doc. 01-12044 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 23, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00273

- CR

Mark Henry BENAVIDES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR7193

H onorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After this court granted appellant’s first request for an extension of time, appellant’s brief

was due October 19, 2018. Appellant has not filed a second motion for extension of time,

seeking an additional thirty days in which to file his brief. After review, we GRANT appellant’s

motion and ORDER appellant to file his brief in this court on or before November 19, 2018

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s et my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

Exhibit 21.1

Baylake Corp

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
List of Subsidiaries                                              Jurisdiction of Organization
--------------------                                              ----------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>
Kewaunee County Banc-Shares, Inc.                                 Wisconsin
  Baylake Bank                                                    Wisconsin
    Bank of Sturgeon Bay Building Corp.                           Wisconsin
    Baylake Insurance Agency, Inc.                                Wisconsin
    Baylake Investments, Inc.                                     Nevada
    Cornerstone Financial, Inc.                                   Wisconsin
    Fish Creek English Inn LLC **                                 Wisconsin
    Arborview LLC *                                               Wisconsin
Baylake Capital Trust I                                           Delaware
</TABLE>

*     Arborview LLC was organized and capitalized on January 24, 2002.

**    Fish Creek English Inn LLC was organized on February 19, 2002 and
      capitalized on April 9, 2002 and sold on July 1, 2002.


                                       93
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  News 

Breadcrumb-  News 

## From Earth to Space:  Astrogeology team tell Denver7 News how they use Terrestrial Analog sites to study our Solar System!  

      By Astrogeology Science Center      December 22, 2022    

Do you want to know how and why scientists use terrestrial analogs to do research and explore space? Watch this quick video of physical scientist Ryan Anderson and geologist Amber Gullikson from USGS Astrogeology Science Center for intriguing answers given to Denver7 News.

Watch the video here. 

## Related Content

## Related Content

          - News   

### Get Our News

These items are in the RSS feed format (Really Simple Syndication) based on categories such as topics, locations, and more. You can install and RSS reader browser extension, software, or use a third-party service to receive immediate news updates depending on the feed that you have added. If you click the feed links below, they may look strange because they are simply XML code. An RSS reader can easily read this code and push out a notification to you when something new is posted to our site.

RSS Icon**

Astrogeology Science Center News

RSS Icon**

Natural Hazards News

RSS Icon**

Planetary Science News
March 23, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2656.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of September 2007 Wheat and mini-sized Wheat futures.
These futures contracts ordinarily would be authorized for trading in May 2006. Due to
customer demand, the Exchange intends to list these contracts earlier than usual (i.e., as of
March 24, 2006).
This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.

There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

## **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

 

 

 

                In connection with this AnnualReport of Pogo Producing Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, James P. Ulm, II, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
|   | /S/  JAMES P. ULM, II                              |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | James  P. Ulm, II                                  |
|   | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

** **

 

March 7, 2005

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,083
<INVENTORY>                                      6,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,006
<PP&E>                                          52,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,428
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,035
<SALES>                                          9,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,601
<CGS>                                            8,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,927)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (667)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,225)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011054EN.01003201.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/32

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the permissible sound level and the exhaust system of motor vehicles’

COM(2010) 508 final — 2010/0261 (COD)

(2011/C 54/07)

On 15 and 7 October 2010 respectively the Council and the European Parliament decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the permissible sound level and the exhaust system of motor vehicles

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the permissible sound level and the exhaust system of motor vehicles

COM(2010) 508 final – 2010/0261 (COD).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 467th plenary session of 8 and 9 December 2010 (meeting of 8 December 2010), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 8 December 2010

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
# C_2004242EN.01000801.xml

| 29.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/8

---

LIST OF COM DOCUMENTS OTHER THAN LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS ADOPTED BY THE COMMISSION FROM 1 JULY 2004 TO 31 JULY 2004
   (1)

LIST OF COM DOCUMENTS OTHER THAN LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS ADOPTED BY THE COMMISSION FROM 1 JULY 2004 TO 31 JULY 2004

1

(2004/C 242/04)

| Document | Part | Date of adoption | Title |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COM(2004) 461 | | 7.7.2004 | Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee: Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community’s generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the 10-year period from 2006 to 2015 |

Document

Part

Date of adoption

Title

COM(2004) 461

7.7.2004

Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee: Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community’s generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the 10-year period from 2006 to 2015

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex.

---

(1)  This list is limited to COM documents that fulfil the conditions for publication.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bryan King, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered June 8, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6930

HENRY LEE KINLAW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF RIDGELAND,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01862-TMC)

Submitted: October 1, 2021 Decided: November 3, 2021

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Lee Kinlaw, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lee Kinlaw seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Kinlaw’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kinlaw has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Kinlaw’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 37 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 37 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 37 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 37 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 37 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 5 of 5