alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         3,160
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    53,101
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         80
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           80
<LOANS>                                        125,183
<ALLOWANCE>                                    999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,125
<DEPOSITS>                                     156,040
<SHORT-TERM>                                   22,024
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,162
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       288
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 202,125
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2,665
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              785
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               36
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3,486
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,382
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,656
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,830
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  97
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             32
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                407
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.70
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,748
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               939
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  39
<RECOVERIES>                                   2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              999
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        999
        


</TABLE>
Holt's Cigar Holdings, Inc.  and Subsidiaries
Pro Forma Net Income Per Share                                      Exhibit 11.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended
                                                           December 31                December 31
                                                    -----------------------     ---------------------

                                                       1996         1997           1996          1997
                                                       ----         ----           ----          ----

<S>                                                 <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>       
Pro forma net income                                $  626,794    $1,037,407    $1,362,901    $2,980,708
                                                    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
Pro forma shares outstanding-beginning of period     4,020,000     4,020,000     4,020,000     4,020,000
Weighted average shares attributable to Offering          --         583,000          --         194,443
                                                    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding        4,020,000     4,603,000     4,020,000     4,214,443
                                                    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
Pro forma net income per share-basic and diluted    $      .16    $      .23    $      .34    $      .71
                                                    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------

                   Supplemental Pro forma Net Income Per Share



Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding                      4,603,000                   4,214,443
Incremental shares necessary to fund shareholder                                             
distribution in excess of current earnings                            70,000                      93,334
                                                                   ---------                 -----------
                                                                   4,673,000                   4,307,777
                                                                   =========                   =========
Supplemental pro forma net income per share                             $.22                        $.69
                                                                   =========                 ===========
</TABLE>
# CE2011236EN.01018602.xml

| 12.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 236/186 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 236/186

---

Wednesday 16 June 2010Organisation of working time: persons performing mobile road transport activities ***I

P7_TA(2010)0221

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 June 2010 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/15/EC on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (COM(2008)0650 – C6-0354/2008 – 2008/0195(COD))

2011/C 236 E/46

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0650),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 71 and 137(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0354/2008),

having regard to the Commission Communication to Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures’ (COM(2009)0665),

having regard to Article 294(3) and Articles 91 and 153(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 25 March 2009 (1),

1

after consulting the Committee of the Regions,

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A7-0137/2010),

| 1. | Rejects the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Rejects the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal and take appropriate steps together with Parliament to submit a new proposal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal and take appropriate steps together with Parliament to submit a new proposal;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 22.9.2009, p. 78.

1

---
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 43 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      205
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (27)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,615
<PP&E>                                           1,570
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (191)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,102
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,405
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   213
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    56
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 872<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,469)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,469)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,469)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.17)
<FN>
<F1>2
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05791-CM Document 9 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05791-CM Document 9 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05791-CM Document 9 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### Billy B. SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant.

No. 83-1114-CV-W-3.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D.

Feb. 7, 1984.

F.O. Griffin, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Daniel J. Devine, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

ORDER ON EXTENSION OF TIME

ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge.

Defendant moves for an extension of time in which to file the transcript in this *1452action. Defendant seeks an additional sixty (60) days or until March 16, 1984.

This social security appeal commenced in October of 1983. Service occurred on November 16, 1983. Defendant asked for the extension on January 16, 1983, sixty (60) days after service. In effect defendant wants 120 days in which to file the transcript.

Defendant does not inform the Court of why it can not meet its deadline. The seeking of additional time by the Department of Health and Human Services has become a routine occurrence in these social securities cases. The extensions as a matter of course should not continue. In many cases they result in substantial hardship on the claimant.

At least one court has granted interim payments pending appeal. *See Day v. Schweiker,*685 F.2d 19 (2nd Cir.1982), *cert. granted,*— U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1873, 76 L.Ed.2d 806 (1983). This Court is not prepared to order such payments at this point, but suggests to the Secretary that unexplained delays may cause the Court to reevaluate its position in order to avoid unnecessary hardship on claimants and their counsel.

Accordingly, the Court

ORDERS the Secretary to file its response to the above styled complaint by or before March 1, 1984. If the Secretary fails to do so the plaintiff may renew its motion for interim benefits or whatever sanctions or other relief he believes applicable.
Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 17 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 17 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, James C. Eckert, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 15, 2006



/s/ James C. EckertJames C. Eckert Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [CO-100-1060-PC; CO-110-1060-PC]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Wild, Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act (Pub. L. 92-195), as amended, provides, among other things, that excess wild horses shall be removed from public lands.

The Bureau of Land Management plans to complete removal operations in August and September, 2001 in the West Douglas Herd Area and in the Sand Wash Herd Management Area. Dates are approximate and depend upon whether conditions and factors unforseen at this time.

The Bureau of Land Management plans to remove approximately 115 wild horses from the West Douglas Herd Area. The number of horses removed from the Sand Wash herd will be determined following establishment in late June, 2001 of a herd appropriate management level.

Pursuant to the requirements noted above, the BLM will conduct a public hearing on the use of helicopters in Colorado for gathering operations during the calendar year of 2001, and a public hearing addressing the removal of horses from the Oil Spring Mountain Wilderness Study Area, associated with the West Douglas Herd Area. A meeting will be held following the hearings to discuss the two planned gathers. The hearings are scheduled to begin at 7 MST on June 11th, 2001 at the White River Field Office of the BLM located at 73544 Highway 64 in Meeker, Colorado.

For additional information regarding the West Douglas Herd Area contact Jim Cagney, White River Field Office; 970-878-3601.

For additional information regarding the Sand Wash Herd management Area contact John Husband at the Little Snake Filed Office; 970-826-5000.

James A. Cagney,

White River Field Office Manager.

[FR Doc. 01-11376  Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-84-M
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




Second Amendment to the Equity Office Properties Trust

2003 Share Option and Share Incentive Plan




 






     WHEREAS, Equity Office Properties Trust (the “Company”) has adopted the Equity Office
Properties Trust 2003 Share Option and Share Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan”), and has reserved the
right to amend the 2003 Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company (the ”Committee”)
is authorized to amend the 2003 Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Committee approved and adopted the First Amendment to the 2003 Plan effective as
of September 20, 2003; and



     WHEREAS, the Committee has approved and adopted this second amendment to the 2003 Plan;




     NOW THEREFORE, the Company amends the 2003 Plan, effective December 15, 2005, in the following
respects:



     The first sentence of Section 15.2.4. “Settlement of Performance Awards; Other Terms” is
amended in its entirety to read as follows:




	 	 	 	Settlement of such Performance Awards shall be in Shares or, in the
discretion of the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice
President – Human Resources of the Company, in cash.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the
Company, this 15th day of December, 2005.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  Stanley M. Stevens
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Stanley M. Stevens 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Executive Vice President, Chief Legal
Counsel and Secretary
#                                                                         New Chaplain Pin Making Waves Across The Surface Force                                                                    

##### by Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet 

07 December 2023SAN DIEGO -- 

                NAVAL BASE CORONADO (November 2, 2023) Lt. Ross Engel receives the Surface Chaplain Officer (SCO) warfare pin during a ceremony held at Commander, Naval Surface Forces, U.S. Pacific Fleet. The Surface Chaplain Officer pin is a newly introduced warfare pin for members of the surface chaplain corps. The qualification insignia was approved this year and made available in Navy Exchanges around the world last week after being approved by the Navy Uniform Board. Nearly 70 Chaplains fleet-wide have earned the qualification to-date. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Mikal Chapman)            

                Navy Chaplain receives Surface Chaplain Officer warfare pin            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Petty Officer 2nd Class Mikal Chapman

VIRIN: 231102-N-SL036-1017

Tags:
**CNSP LATEST NEWS**Chaplain**SAN DIEGO
#### Robert James DIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. YATES, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-15508.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 23, 2013.

Robert James Dixon, pro se.

Shanan L. Hewitt, Esquire, Rivera *&*Associates, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Robert James Dixon appeals pro se from the district *575court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, *Wyatt v. Terhune,*815 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003), and for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to effectuate service, *Puett v. Blandford,*912 F.2d 270, 273 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed without prejudice Dixon’s Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Igbinosa because Dixon failed properly to exhaust his administrative remedies. *See Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (holding that “proper exhaustion” is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing without prejudice the claims against defendant Diep because Dixon failed to effectuate service in a timely manner. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (requiring service within 120 days after complaint is filed); *Walker v. Sumner,*14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir.1994) (holding that an incarcerated pro se plaintiff proceeding in for-ma pauperis must provide the marshal with sufficient information necessary for service), *abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v. Conner,*515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Dixon’s request for appointment of counsel because Dixon failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances. *See Palmer v. Valdez,*560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir.2009) (setting forth standard of review and the exceptional circumstances requirement).

Dixon’s motion to accept the late filed reply brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the reply brief submitted on April 25, 2013.

Dixon’s motions for appointment of counsel, filed on February 4, 2013, and May 10, 2013, are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.