alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5

<LEGEND>
                         This schedule contains summary financial
                         information extracted from the consolidated
                         financial statements of United Grocers, Inc., for
                         the fiscal year ended October 3, 1997 and is
                         qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                         financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    OCT-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         OCT-03-1997
<CASH>                                                         10,223
<SECURITIES>                                                   51,513
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  86,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    7,739
<INVENTORY>                                                   102,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              257,790
<PP&E>                                                        110,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 48,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                365,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         150,577
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       25,820
<OTHER-SE>                                                   (11,169)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  365,427
<SALES>                                                     1,306,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            1,306,602
<CGS>                                                       1,133,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 164,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             (19,959)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               10,772
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             16,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (21,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 (10,466)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (11,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  2,501
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (8,660)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0


</TABLE>
711 F.2d 418

#### William R. WESSON, Anne G. Wesson and John Charles Vaiani, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Respondents.

No. 83-1282.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed April 22, 1983.

Decided July 22, 1983.

John Broadley, Gen. Counsel, Henri F. Rush, Associate Gen. Counsel, John J. McCarthy, Jr., Atty., I.C.C., Washington, D.C., were on motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary affirmance for respondent, I.C.C.

Neil R. Ellis and John J. Powers, III, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., entered appearances for respondent, United States of America.

Anne G. Wesson, William R. Wesson, and John Charles Vaiani were on response to motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary affirmance, pro se.

Before MIKVA and EDWARDS,* Circuit Judges, MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*

 Circuit Judge Edwards did not participate in the disposition of this case.

Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

William Wesson, Anne Wesson and John Vaiani (Petitioners) filed a petition for review of an ICC order denying rehearing of a matter — the proper valuation of their Class B stock after recapitalization of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company — which has been litigated in various forums. *See*Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Securities, 347 ICC 377 (1973).

We have once before determined that the claim raised by the petition is barred by *res judicata. Wesson v. ICC,*No. 79-1513 (D.C.Cir. March 25, 1981) (unpublished). The Interstate Commerce Commission reached the identical conclusion. No issue warranting departure from well-established preclusion doctrine appears in the papers before us. It is therefore,

ORDERED by the Court that the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission sought to be reviewed is affirmed.

*Judgment accordingly.*
October 7, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" St., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File SR-PBOT-2005-04
Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Rule 40.6, the Philadelphia Board of Trade (“PBOT”) hereby
submits the following:

- Amendment to Section (d) of PBOT Rule 1207. New language is underlined.
The purpose of the proposed amendment is to clarify that PBOT may provide daily
settlement prices even on days when there is no PBOT trading, including days when

PBOT is closed for trading.

The PBOT intends to implement this amendment no sooner than one business day
following the Commission’s receipt of this filing.

There were no opposing views among the Executive Committee of the PBOT Board of
Directors concerning the amendment.

The PBOT certifies that the amendment complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and
the rules thereunder.

Sincerely,
Walt Smith
Vice President

ec: Mr. Marvin Jackson


Additions underlined

Rule 1207.
Final Settlement and Delivery

(a) No change.
(b) No change.
(c) No change.

(d) This rule 1207(d) applies to daily settlement prices but not to final settlement prices.
The settlement price for each foreign currency futures contract shall be the weighted
average of the prices traded within the last minute of trading, as determined by the
Exchange. If a contract month of a foreign currency futures contract has not traded in the
last minute of trading, the settlement price for that contract month shall be fixed by the
Exchange at the median of the highest bid and the lowest offer for that contract month
during the last minute of trading. If both a bid and an offer have not been made during the
final minute of trading in a contract month, the settlement price for that contract month
shall be set at the same differential which such contract month had the next earlier
contract month (in the case where the contract month is the spot month, the next later
contract month) using the previous day's settlement prices to determine said differential.
If such settlement price is not consistent with other sales in other contract months of a
foreign currency futures contract during the closing range or with market information
known to the designated Exchange official supervising the closing, or if the settlement
price is determined on a day in which no trading occurs on the Exchange because the
Exchange is not open for business or for any other reason, such Exchange official may
establish a settlement price at a level consistent with such other sales or market
information, and shall prepare a written record setting forth the basis for any modification
of such settlement price made pursuant to this paragraph (d).
Exhibit
31(b)



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I,
Robert A. Phillips, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of Quantum Materials Corp. for the period ending December
31, 2018; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



|February
    26, 2019 | /s/
    Robert A. Phillips                         
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|                      | Robert
    A. Phillips, Principal Financial Officer
#### ONE BIG-SIX STUDEBAKER AUTOMOBILE, etc., et al. v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 28, 1923.)

No. 3934.

Internal revenue <§=2—Forfeiture of vehicles statute repealed by National Prohibition Act.

Kev. St. § 3450 (Comp. St. § 6352), as to forfeitures of vehicles, was repealed by National Prohibition Act

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana; George M. Bourquin, Judge.

Proceeding by the United States to forfeit one Big-Six Studebaker automobile, tools, and accessories; Harvey Noble, claimant. Decree of forfeiture, and claimant brings error.

Reversed.

Freeman, Thelen & Frary, of Great Falls, Mont., for plaintiffs in error.

John L. Slattery, U. S. Atty., and Ronald Higgins and W. H. Meigs, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Helena, Mont.

Before GIEBERT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and WOEVERTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 6352) to forfeit an automobile used in the transportation of intoxicating liquor. In McDowell v. United States, 286 Fed. 521, decided February 5, 1923, this court held that section 3450 was repealed by the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305).

For the reasons there stated, the decree is reversed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 41 – Albedo      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn how about reflected surface radiation and how satellites track it.

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: Albedo—the amount of incoming solar radiation reflected into space from the Earth’s surface—is a key measurement for surface temperatures and plant productivity. It also factors into weather forecasting and climate modeling. Landsat Science Team member Dr. Crystal Schaaf works with graduate and postdoctoral students to measure albedo using satellite data from the University of Massachusetts-Boston. On this episode of Eyes on Earth, Dr. Schaaf talks about albedo’s importance and how satellites can be used to track changes to it over time.

**Guest**:  Dr. Crystal Schaaf, University of Massachusetts-Boston

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: January 11, 2021

**More on Albedo**: 
                            - Remote Sensing of Earth Systems – UMass Boston
                            - Landsat Science Teams
                            -  Landsat Science Team's Crystal Schaaf Discusses Albedo, Its Importance, and How It Can Affect Climate 

### Contacts
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 32 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.5


 


AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment
(the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement entered into
August 19, 2004 between Oren G. Shaffer (the “Executive”) and Qwest
Services Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the “Company”) (the “Employment
Agreement”) and previously amended on October 21, 2005  is made and entered into on December      ,
2005 between the Executive and the Company.


 


WITNESSETH THAT:


 


WHEREAS, the
parties previously entered into the Employment Agreement pertaining to the
employment of the Executive by the Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties amended the Employment Agreement on October 21, 2005 in certain
respects;


 


WHEREAS, the
parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement to address uncertainties created
by certain regulations promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
below, the Executive and Company hereby amend the Employment Agreement as
follows:


 


1.                                       The
last sentence of Subparagraph 3(e) is hereby amended in its entirety to
provide as follows:


 


With respect to all option grants except
those awarded on March 4, 2005 (1,000,000 options with an exercise price
of $3.89), March 3, 2003 (650,000 options with an exercise price of
$3.44), and July 8, 2002 (2,000,000 options with an exercise price of
$2.10), in the event the Executive resigns or retires from the employ of the
Company after December 31, 2006, any such vested option shall be exercisable
for six (6) years following such date of termination of employment, but in
no event later than the expiration of the term of the option, but only to the
extent that under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code this extension
of time to exercise would not be viewed as a deferral of compensation.


 


2.                                       Except
as specifically set forth above, the Employment Agreement, as previously
amended, remains in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand, and the Company has caused
this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf, all on the day and
year first above written.


 





















 


	
   

  	
  COMPANY:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  QWEST
  SERVICES CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ATTEST:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Oren G.
  Shaffer

  
				



 


2
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 

#           About        

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Maps 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  Software 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

**The USGS Astrogeology Science Center in Flagstaff, Arizona** was founded in 1963 to map the Moon and assist in training the Apollo astronauts. We have remained on the cutting edge of solar system exploration ever since.

**Mission Statement:** To help humanity understand our solar system by maximizing the scientific and technological return from planetary missions through scientific research, software development, and the creation of spatial data products and standards.

**Vision Statement:**  To lead and enable planetary exploration, further our knowledge of worlds beyond our own, promote a sustained and peaceful human presence in the Solar System, and share our discoveries to engage and inspire the world.

**Culture Statement:** We are as committed to each other as we are to the high quality of our work. We value integrity and celebrate our diversity. We remember our history and embrace necessary change and innovation. We always strive to improve so that we may better live up to these ideals.

 

 

History of Astrogeology

## History of Astrogeology
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-59497 and333-08139 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated October 6, 2008, relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of NatureSunshine Products, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to therestatement discussed in Note 2) and the effectiveness of Nature SunshineProducts, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting(which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses and ascope limitation on expressing an opinion on Management’ Report on InternalControl over Financial Reporting), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Nature Sunshine Products, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31,2006.

 

/s/  Deloitte &Touche LLP

 

Salt Lake City, Utah

October 6, 2008

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

PANCRI DIEZ and ROSA DIEZ,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-05351-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 30 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 11, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 30 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 30-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 30-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      15,655,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,437,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,300,000
<INVENTORY>                                 31,224,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            91,126,000
<PP&E>                                      23,671,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,789,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,655,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,964,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       235,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 158,562,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               111,655,000
<SALES>                                     35,755,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,755,000
<CGS>                                       20,563,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,563,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (32,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,384,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (617,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (767,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (767,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herman Palmer, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly allowed the People to amend counts 5 and 6 of the indictment to correct the date on which the alleged crimes took place *(see,*CPL 200.70 [1]; *People v Powell,*137 AD2d 730; *People v Robinson,*119 AD2d 598, 599, *Iv denied*68 NY2d 816; *People v Leon,*115 AD2d 907, 908). The amendment did not in any way change the theory of the prosecution’s case and defendant failed to demonstrate any credible way in which he would be prejudiced if an adjournment was not granted *(People v Clapper,*123 AD2d 484, 485, *Iv denied*69 NY2d 825; *People v Leon, supra,*at 908).

We have reviewed the other claims raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree, and another charge.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 36 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 36 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1761 

To prohibit Federal funding of State firearm ownership databases, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. 

HICE of Georgia, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. COLLINS of New York, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. 

HARRIS, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. 

GOHMERT, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. 

MASSIE, Mr. BUDD, Mr. GUEST, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. LAMBORN, 

Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. LAMALFA, and Mr. DUNCAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding of State firearm ownership 

databases, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Owner Registra5 tion Information Protection Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1761 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING OF STATE 

2 FIREARM OWNERSHIP DATABASES. 

3 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of 

5 the several States, the District of Columbia, the 

6 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth 

7 of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, 

8 Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, and any 

9 other territory or possession of the United States. 

10 (2) STATE FIREARM OWNERSHIP DATABASE.— 

11 The term ‘‘State firearm ownership database’’ 

12 means a comprehensive or partial database of a 

13 State or political subdivision of a State that lists— 

14 (A) firearms lawfully owned or possessed 

15 by individuals; or 

16 (B) individuals who lawfully own or pos17 sess firearms. 

18 (b) PROHIBITION.—A Federal agency may not fund 

19 or otherwise support the establishment or maintenance of 

20 a State firearm ownership database. 

21 (c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (b) shall not apply to 

22 a database of a State or political subdivision of a State 

23 that lists— 

24 (1) firearms that have been reported as lost or 

25 stolen; or 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1761 IH

1 (2) individuals who have reported their firearms 

2 as lost or stolen. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS