alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 477.

#### Diamond Rubber Company of New York, Petitioner, *v.*Consolidated Rubber Tire Company et al.

Octo*575ber 19, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted. *Mr. Charles K. Offield*fbr petitioner. *Mr. Charles W. Stapleton, Mr. T. W. Bakewell*and *Mr. F. P. Fish*for respondents.
142 So. 572

#### WALLACE v. SCREWS et al.

2 Div. *7.*

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 9, 1932.

G. C. Walker, of Clanton, and L. H. Ellis, of Columbiana, for appellant.

Arthur M. Pitts, of Selma, for appellees.

*188BROWN, J.

A final judgment disposing of the case and allowing the defendant “to go hence” is essential to confer jurisdiction on this court to review the rulings of the circuit court, under section 6431 of the Code. Wood, use, &c. v. Coman et al., 56 Ala. 283; Eslava v. Jones, 79 Ala. 287; Martin v. Alabama Power Co., 208 Ala. 212, 94 So. 76; State ex rel. Wright v. Kemp, 205 Ala. 201, 87 So. 836; Wise et al. v. Spears et al., 200 Ala. 695, 76 So. 869; Alston v. Marengo County Board of Education, 224 Ala. 676, 141 So. 658.

Under the rulings in the cases cited, the judgment in the instant case will not support an appeal, and the appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Thornton Donaldson, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Texola Energy Corporation;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; 

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 7, 2007

/s/ Thornton Donaldson

Thornton Donaldson

President, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### Anthony Gardino et al., Respondents, v Louis Rescignano et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs brought an action for injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to RPAPL article 15 and obtained a temporary restraining order *(see,*CPLR 6313 [a]) prohibiting defendants from clearing a parcel of land. The court did not require plaintiffs to give an undertaking *(see,*CPLR 6313 [c]). Defendants counterclaimed for damages sustained by reason of the temporary restraining order. After a hearing, the court denied plaintiffs’ application for a preliminary injunction, vacated the temporary restraining order and dismissed defendants’ counterclaim. Defendants appeal from the order dismissing their counterclaim, and we affirm.

Since the temporary restraining order was not conditioned on the posting of an undertaking, defendants cannot seek damages. "Where, for whatever reason, an undertaking is not posted as a condition for a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order, the enjoined party is without a remedy unless he can prove malice” *(Honeywell, Inc. v Technical Bldg. Servs.,*103 AD2d 433, 434; *see also, Doran & Assocs. v Envirogas, Inc.,*112 AD2d 766, 768, *appeal dismissed*66 NY2d 758). Defendants produced no proof of malice and, therefore, their counterclaim was properly dismissed. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Aronson, J.H.O. — dismiss counterclaim.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 23.2

                         POPOV & McCULLOGH, LLP
                            ATTORNEYS AT LAW

                                            Regents Park Financial Centre
                                   4180 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 315
                                               La Jolla, California 93027
                                                       ------
                                                      Tel: (858) 457-2900
                                                      Fax: (858) 457-2950

                              June 23, 2000


MRI Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
480 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 140
San Diego, California  92108

Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the use of our name in the Form 10-K to be filed
by MRI Medical Diagnostics, Inc. on or about June 26, 2000 in the section
captioned "Legal Matters," and we also consent to the filing of this
opinion as an exhibit thereto.  In giving this consent, we do not thereby
admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required
under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 or the rules and regulations
of the Commission thereunder.

                              Very truly yours,


                              /s/ Popov & McCullogh, LLP


                                   POPOV & MCCULLOGH, LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1791 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1791

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt survivor benefit 
   annuity plan payments from the individual alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2019

   Mr. Larsen of Washington (for himself, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mrs. 
Rodgers of Washington, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Wilson 
  of South Carolina, and Mr. Wittman) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt survivor benefit 
   annuity plan payments from the individual alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children of Fallen Servicemembers 
AMT Relief Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR SURVIVOR BENEFIT ANNUITY PLAN PAYMENTS FROM THE 
              INDIVIDUAL ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 59(j)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new flush sentence:
        ``Solely for purposes of this subsection, any annuity paid 
        under the Survivor Benefit Plan under subchapter II of chapter 
        73 of title 10, United States Code, shall be considered earned 
        income.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.2

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

      THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into
effective as of November 2, 2005, by and between ETOTALSOURCE, INC., a Colorado
corporation (the "Company"), and CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware
limited partnership (the "Investor").

                                    RECITALS:

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor entered into a securities purchase
agreement dated as of August 24, 2005 (the "Securities Purchase Agreement"), an
investor's registration rights agreement dated as of August 24, 2005 (the
"Investor Registration Rights Agreement"), a convertible debenture dated as of
August 24, 2005 (the "Convertible Debenture"), and a security agreement dated as
of August 24, 2005 (the "Security Agreement") (collectively, the Securities
Purchase Agreement, the Convertible Debenture, the Investor's Registration
Rights Agreement and the Security Agreement are referred to as the "Transaction
Documents.").

      NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the
mutual promises, conditions and covenants contained herein and in the
Transaction Documents, and other good and valuable consideration, receipt and
adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

      1.    Termination. Each of the parties to this Agreement hereby terminates
            the Transaction Documents and the respective rights and obligations
            contained therein. As a result of this provision, none of the
            parties shall have any rights or obligations under or with respect
            to the Transaction Documents.

      2.    Structuring Fees. The Investor retains all structuring fees under
            the Transaction Documents.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and delivered this
Termination Agreement on the date first set forth above.

ETOTALSOURCE, INC.                        CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP

                                          By: Yorkville Advisors, LLC
                                          Its: General Partner

By:      /s/ Michael Sullinger            By:      /s/ Mark A. Angelo
   -----------------------------------       ------------------------
Name:    Michael Sullinger                Name:    Mark A. Angelo
Title:   Chief Operating Officer          Title:   Portfolio Manager
WILBURN H. RUTHERFORD
,
Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1188

Opinion filed May 27, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Wilburn H. Rutherford, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee , for Res pondent.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for

postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently issued an order striking

four grounds raised in the motion with leave to amend, w e deny the p etition for writ of

mandamus, but encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously

dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State

, 775 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA

2001).

THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,839
<PP&E>                                       6,270,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                 848,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,508,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          607,867
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       291,637
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,608,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,508,145
<SALES>                                        702,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,173,329
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  885,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                288,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            288,172
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   288,172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

     The following is a listing of all subsidiaries of The Seibels Bruce
Group, Inc. as of December 31, 1999:

<TABLE>
<S>                                                             <C>
SUBSIDIARY

Agency Specialty of Kentucky, Inc.                              Kentucky

America's Flood Services, Inc.                                  California

Catawba Insurance Company                                       South Carolina

Consolidated American Insurance Company                         South Carolina

FLT Plus, Inc.                                                  South Carolina

Graward General Companies, Inc.                                 Tennessee

Investors National Life Insurance Company of South Carolina     South Carolina

Policy Finance Company                                          South Carolina

Premium Budget Plan, Inc.                                       North Carolina

Seibels, Bruce & Company                                        South Carolina

Seibels Bruce Service Corporation                               South Carolina

Seibels Bruce Specialty, Inc.                                   South Carolina

South Carolina Insurance Company                                South Carolina

Universal Insurance Company                                     North Carolina
</TABLE>

     The financial statements of these subsidiaries are included in the
              Registrant's consolidated financial statements.
No. 105.

#### American Felt Company, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*Garrett W. Scollard, Collector of Taxes of Boston, Mass.

In error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the. State of Massachusetts. October 13, 1908. Dismissed per stipulation. *Mr. HolUs R. Bailey*for plaintiff in error. *Mr. Thomas M. Babson*for defendant in error.
May 17, 2007

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2789.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of December 2009 Wheat and mini-sized Wheat futures.

These futures contracts ordinarily would be authorized for trading in July 2007. Due to customer
demand, the Exchange intends to list these contracts earlier than usual (i.e., as of May 18, 2007).

This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.
There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1354-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

      ( print page 24372)    

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Arkansas, (FEMA-1354-DR), dated December 29, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

April 24, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice is hereby given that as authorized by the President in a letter dated March 1, 2001, FEMA is extending the time period for Federal funding for debris removal at 100 percent of total eligible costs through June 28, 2001.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director. 

[FR Doc. 01-12031 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
cme @

Chicago Mercantile Exchange
20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax

www.cme.com

June 9, 2006

Via Electronic Mail

Ms. Eileen Donovan 5 agi

Acting Secretary of the Commission sail TREATMENT
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1h

Three Lafayette Centre peeks

1155 21" Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: FOIA Confidentiality Treatment Request
Dear Mr. Colbert,

Pursuant to Regulation Section 145.9, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME” or
“Exchange”) hereby petitions the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) that the
attached Liquidity Provider Program for NYMEX Globex Contracts Submission be accepted and
retained in confidence by the Commission. The Exchange requests that the Liquidity Provider Program
for NYMEX Globex Contracts Submission be retained in confidence until further notice as against any
requestor who files with the Commission a request to inspect such information pursuant to the Freedom
of Information Act (“FOIA”).

The basis for this petition for confidential treatment is Regulation Section 145.9(d)(1)(ii), in that
such information contains trade secrets and confidential commercial information. | understand that this

petition will not be evaluated by the Commission unless and until an FOIA request has been filed for
inspection of this subject matter. In that event, please contact me at the phone number printed above.

Sincerely,
/S/ Matthew F. Kluchenek
Director and Associate General Counsel

ce: Ms. Riva Adriance
Ms. Gabrielle Sudik

enc.

Privileged and Confidential Information
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1620 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 

Chesapeake Bay Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mrs. LURIA (for herself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and Mr. SARBANES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 

reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Pro5 gram Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PRO7 GRAM. 

8 Section 117(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

9 Act (33 U.S.C. 1267(j)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘$40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2005’’ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1620 IH

1 and inserting ‘‘$90,000,000 for fiscal year 2020, 

2 $90,500,000 for fiscal year 2021, $91,000,000 for fiscal 

3 year 2022, $91,500,000 for fiscal year 2023, and 

4 $92,000,000 for fiscal year 2024’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2