alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 57      Filed 04/04/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 57      Filed 04/04/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 57      Filed 04/04/2008     Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-202-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

 January 9, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 29, 2000, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to 
become effective January 1, 2001.

    Thirty First Revised Sheet No. 9

    National asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's order issued February 16, 1996, in Docket Nos. RP94-
367-000, et al. Under Article I, Section 4, of the settlement approved 
in that order, National must redetermine quarterly the Amortization 
Surcharge to reflect revisions in the Plant to be Amortized, interest 
and associated taxes, and a change in the determinants. The 
recalculation produced an Amortization Surcharge of 7.15 cents per dth.
    Further National states that under Article II, Section 2, of the 
settlement, it is required to recalculate the maximum Interruptible 
Gathering (``IG'') rate monthly and to charge that rate on the first 
day of the following month if the result is an IG rate more than 2 
cents above or below the IG rate as calculated under Section 1 of 
Article II. The recalculation produced an IG rate of 39 cents per dth. 
In addition, Article III, Section 1 states that any overruns of the 
Firm Gathering service provided by National shall be priced at the 
maximum IG rate.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1147 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
143 So. 836

#### Howard PERRY v. STATE.

6 Div. 206.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 13, 1932.

J. B. Stephenson, of Parrish, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Howard Perry for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Perry v. State, 143 So. 835.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of YP.Net, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angelo
Tullo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                 /s/ ANGELO TULLO
                                 -----------------
                                 Angelo Tullo
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 February 12, 2003


26
<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of YP.Net, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Iannini,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                 /s/  DAVID IANNINI
                                 ------------------

                                 David Iannini
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 February xx, 2003


27
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
AMRESCO, INC.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements No. 033-60015 and No. 033-58629 on
Form S-8 and Registration Statements No. 333-27853, No. 033-
65329, No. 333-13823, No. 333-00157, and No. 333-25353 on
Form S-3 of our report dated February 2, 1998 (except Note 15
which is as of March 11, 1998) appearing in this Annual Report
on Form10-K of AMRESCO, INC. for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/DELIOTTE & TOUCHE LLP
   Dallas, Texas

March 27, 1998
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 26 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 26 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 26 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 3 of 3
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Benjamin Moore & Co.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2
to Registration Statement No. 33-2694 and in Registration Statement Nos.
33-39750 and 33-69480 of Benjamin Moore & Co. on Form S-8 of our report dated
March 7, 1997 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the method of accounting for
postemployment benefits) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Benjamin Moore & Co. for the year ended December 31, 1996.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
March 27, 1997
Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 1 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 2 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 3 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 4 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 5 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 6 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 7 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 8 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 9 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 10 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 11 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 12 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 13 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 14 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 15 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 16 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 17 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 18 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 19 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05804-RJS   Document 28   Filed 05/23/08   Page 20 of 20
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 26849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1394-000, et al.]


Enron Energy Services, Inc., et al.; Notice of issuance of Order

May 9, 2001.
    Enron Energy Services, Inc., et al. (Enron Energy) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Enron Energy will engage in 
wholesale electric power and energy transactions at market-based rates. 
Enron Energy also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. 
In particular, Enron Energy requested that the Commission grant blanket 
approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by Enron Energy.
    On April 27, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Enron Energy should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Enron Energy is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations 
or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in 
respect of any security of another person; provided that such issuance 
or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes 
of the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Enron Energy's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 29, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.200(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at 

http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12146 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05432-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05432-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
No. 11.

#### George A. Treadwell et al., Appellants, *v.*George O. Marrs.

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the. Territory of Arizona. November 4, 1908. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. *'Mr. Charles M. Demand*for appellants. *Mr. T. G. Norris*and *Mr. John M. Ross*for appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In connection with the Report of HERITAGE-CRYSTAL CLEAN, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 11, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory Ray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
  Date: October 22, 2010
By: /s/ Gregory RayGregory RayChief Financial Officer, Vice President, Business

Management and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23925-23926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6975-8]


Petroleum Products Superfund Site Notice of Proposed De Minimis 
Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed de minimis settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(g)(4) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) has offered a de minimis settlement at the 
Petroleum Products Superfund Site (Site) under an Administrative Order 
on Consent (AOC) to settle claims for past and future response costs at 
the Site. Approximately 77 parties have returned signature pages 
accepting EPA's settlement offer. EPA will consider public comments on 
the proposed settlement for thirty days. EPA may withdraw from or 
modify the proposed settlement should such comments

[[Page 23926]]

disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement 
is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.
    Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. 
Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, CERCLA 
Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, 
S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887.
    Written comment may be submitted to Mr. Greg Armstrong at the above 
address within 30 days of the date of publication.

    Dated: May 1, 2001.
James T. Miller,
Acting Chief, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management 
Division.
[FR Doc. 01-11834 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
II 

Calendar No. 298 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1844 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, as the ‘‘Corporal Alex Martinez Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL ALEX MARTINEZ MEMORIAL POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, 

7 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Alex Mar8 tinez Memorial Post Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1844 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Alex Mar5 tinez Memorial Post Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 298 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1844 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. linois, as the ‘‘Corporal Alex Martinez Memorial al Service located at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, IlNOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1150; MM Docket No. 01-26; RM-10045]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Patterson, GA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 296A to Patterson, Georgia, as 
that community's first local aural transmission service, in response to 
a petition for rule making filed by Bernice P. Hedrick and supported by 
Mattox Broadcasting, Inc. See 66 FR 10267, February 14, 2001. This 
allotment requires a site restriction 2.9 kilometers (1.8 miles) east 
of Patterson, utilizing coordinates at 31-23-12 NL and 82-06-18 WL.

DATES: Effective June 18, 2001. A filing window for Channel 296A at 
Patterson, Georgia, will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue 
of opening the allotment for auction will be addressed by the 
Commission in a subsequent Order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180. Questions related to the application process should be 
addressed to the Audio Services Division, (202) 418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-26, adopted April 25, 2001, and 
released May 4, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Georgia, is 
amended by adding Patterson, Channel 296A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-12270 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS     Document 400      Filed 01/22/2008     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 15, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C.
  PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerJuly
      26, 2010
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 27-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 27-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 27-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 27-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 27-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Boyd, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered July 21, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the second degree, and petit larceny, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the hearing court improperly denied his motion to suppress the complainant’s proposed identification testimony. We disagree. The People met their burden of going forward to establish the reasonableness of the police conduct and the lack of suggestiveness of the procedures used and the defendant did not then prove that the photographic identification procedures were unduly suggestive *(see, People v Ludwigsen,*128 AD2d 810, *lv denied*69 NY2d 1006).

The defendant also contends that his statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial were violated. On or about June 21, 1983, the defendant served a *pro se*motion on the People *642raising the speedy trial issue. While the People served a response, there is no indication in the record that this motion was ever filed with the court for judicial disposition. Moreover, during the plea colloquy on June 29, 1983, and the subsequent sentence proceeding on July 21, 1983, no mention of the motion was made. Under these circumstances, we find that the issue has not been properly preserved for review by this court *(see, People v Adams,*38 NY2d 605).

In any event, by pleading guilty, the defendant waived any alleged violation of his statutory right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 *(see, People v O’Brien,*56 NY2d 1009). Further, were we to reach the issue, we would find the defendant’s claimed violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial to be without merit *(see, People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299; *People v Taranovich,*37 NY2d 442). Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I,
Virland A.Johnson, the Principal Financial Officer of Live Ventures Incorporated, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Live Ventures
Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Live Ventures Incorporated.



Dated:
August  10, 2017







| | /s/
Virland A. Johnson
Virland A. Johnson

Principal Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH     Document 15      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1