alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32-1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              Greg              Koler                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| Greg                KolerChief                Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial OfficerMay                19, 2006 |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                                           |   |   |   |

----
#### In the Matter of Daniel J. Pagnani, Jr., Appellant, v Winthrop University Hospital et al., Respondents.

Appeal by the petitioner from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.), entered June 10, 1988.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Collins at the Supreme Court. Mangano, J: P., Brown, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael McGourty, Appellant.

Harvey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Williams, J.), rendered May 26, 1988, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of burglary in the third degree and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

In April 1988, as part of a plea-bargain arrangement, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of burglary in the third degree in full satisfaction of a two-count indictment. Pursuant to the agreement, defendant was later allowed to, among other things, plead guilty to a reduced misdemeanor charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol. Thereafter, defendant was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate prison term of 2 to 4 years on the burglary conviction. He also received a fine and a definite term of one year for the misdemeanor conviction, to be served concurrently with the burglary sentence. This appeal followed.

We affirm. Initially, defendant contends that his plea of guilty was not voluntarily made. Notably, defendant failed to preserve this issue for appellate review by either moving to withdraw his plea or by moving to vacate his judgment of conviction *(see, People v Smith,*146 AD2d 828, *lv denied*74 NY2d 669). Since defendant’s plea allocutions were both clear and unequivocal, we see no reason to reverse on this issue as an exercise of discretion in the interest of justice. Next, we find no merit to defendant’s claim that the mandatory minimum sentence on the burglary conviction required by Penal Law § 70.06 imposed upon him as a second felony offender is unconstitutional as applied to him. We see nothing unusual or *992extenuating concerning the particular facts surrounding defendant’s case to indicate that the statute was unconstitutionally applied *(see, People v Collins,*134 AD2d 607, *lv denied*70 NY2d 1005; *see also, People v Broadie,*37 NY2d 100, *cert denied sub nom. Brown v New York,*423 US 950). Finally, in our view, defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 12 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 10-8 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 14
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo GARCIA-ABARCA, a.k.a. Ricardo Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo Garcia-Abarca, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 12-15193, 12-15194

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 7, 2013.

Patricia D. Barksdale, Arnold B. Cors-meier, Michael F. Gallagher, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Jacksonville, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roland Falcon, Law Office of Roland Falcon, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HULL, JORDAN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Roland Falcon, counsel for Ricardo Garcia-Abarca in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a *873brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garcia-Abar-ca’s conviction and sentence, along with the revocation of his supervised release and corresponding sentence, are AFFIRMED.
Clear All

        19 April 2024    

                    Navy Munitions Command Atlantic Det Pax Sailor Provides Life-Saving Roadside Assistance                 
                Driving with his wife, Mercado saw the scene of the collision involving a motorcycle and a compact SUV at Three Notch Road and Tom Hodges Drive in Hollywood, Maryland. Realizing he was the first on scene he went into action without a second thought.            

        06 April 2023    

                    Naval Air Station Patuxent River Gets Earth Day Honors for Shoreline Restoration Work                 
                This Earth Day will be an extra-special one for Naval Air Station (NAS) Patuxent River. The Navy base’s Environment Division will be honored by St. Mary’s County with a Sustainability Award for a shoreline restoration project to stop soil erosion and rebuild natural habitat areas on the Patuxent            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
December 22, 2006

BY EMAIL AND FACSIMILE POF, Lbs
Office of the Secretariat —
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 06.156: Delisting of Four
NYMEX Brent Swaps Contracts

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission’”) that it will delist
three Swaps on Tuesday, December 26, 2006: NYMEX Brent Calendar Swap (SA), NYMEX
Brent Bullet Swap Contract (BN), and NYMEX Brent-WTI Bullet Swap Contract (WN). There
is no open interest in these contracts.

The NYMEX WTI-Brent Spread Calendar Swap (SB) will be delisted on January 2, 2007
after the final settlement of the December 2006 contract month. All months beyond the
December 2006 contract in the NYMEX WTI-Brent Spread Calendar Swap (SB) will be delisted
effective on December 26, 2006.

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6,
the Exchange hereby certifies that the delisting of these contracts complies with the Act,
including regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Daniel Brusstar,
Director, Research, at (212) 299-2604; or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2390.

Very truly yours,

Robert A. Levin
Senior Vice President, Research
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian S. Bull, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and drawing all reasonable inferences *(see, People v Ford,*66 NY2d 428, 437), we conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction of eight counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and one count of grand larceny in the third degree. Proof was presented that the checks were stolen, that the signature of the drawer was forged, and that, over a three-day period, eight forged checks totaling $9,200, made payable to defendant, were deposited through automatic teller machines into his newly opened account. Defendant told bank personnel that he had made deposits in the automatic teller machine. He also questioned bank personnel regarding the length of time there would be a hold on money deposited through these machines and withdrew $6,000 as soon as possible. This evidence, together with other proof, provided a valid line of reasoning supporting the jury verdict *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J. — criminal possession of forged instrument, second degree, eight counts; grand larceny, third degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EX-10.28.1



 






Exhibit 10.28.1









December 20, 2005




Jeffrey R. Black

100 Endo Boulevard

Chadds Ford, PA 19317



Dear Jeff:




     Reference is hereby made to that certain amended and restated employment agreement, dated as
of September 1, 2002 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”), between you and Endo Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the “Company”). Terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Employment Agreement.



     Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Employment Agreement, the Company hereby informs you that it
wishes to renew the Employment Agreement for an additional period of one year. If you are in
agreement, the Employment Period shall now cease on December 31, 2006, unless otherwise modified in
accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement. In addition, Section 3.1(a) shall hereby be
amended to change the definition of Salary to $350,000.



     All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect. If you are in agreement with this renewal, which shall be effective as of the date first
above written, please execute below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Peter A. Lankau
 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Peter A. Lankau

President & Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED THIS 20th DAY OF DECEMBER 2005:




/s/ Jeffrey R. Black

Jeffrey R. Black
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1673 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1673

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 with respect 
 to the definition of agricultural commodities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2019

   Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Lawson of 
  Florida, and Mr. Schrader) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 with respect 
 to the definition of agricultural commodities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Trucking Relief Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES.

    Section 229(e)(7) of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 
1999 (49 U.S.C. 31136 note) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(7) Agricultural commodity.--The term `agricultural 
        commodity' includes--
                    ``(A) agricultural, aquacultural, horticultural, 
                and floricultural commodities;
                    ``(B) fruits;
                    ``(C) vegetables;
                    ``(D) any non-human living animal and the products 
                thereof; and
                    ``(E) other agriculture products that are--
                            ``(i) sensitive to temperature or climate; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) at risk of perishing in transit.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11719]



[[Page 23754]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 195; Flight Information Services 
Communications (FISC)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Special Committee (SC)-195 meeting to be held May 31-June 1, 2001, 
starting at 8:30 a.m. each day. The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 
1140 Connecticut Ave., NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will include: May 31: Plenary convenes: (1) Welcome and 
Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Meeting Agenda; (3) Working Group 
(WG)-1, Aircraft Cockpit Weather Display; Plenary reconvenes: (4) 
Review of Previous Meeting Minutes; (5) Report from WG-1 on Activities; 
(6) Review of Product Registry Guidance Draft Document; June 1: (7) 
Review of NOTAMS and D-ATIS Draft Specification; (8) Work on Change 1, 
RTCA Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) for FIS/B; 
(9) Other Business; (10) Date and place of Next Meeting; (11) Closing.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 2, 2001.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 01-11719 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 28      Filed 07/21/2008     Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

                                                                   Exhibits 99.2

 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 20-F of Oxford  Investments
Holdings Inc., a company  organized under the laws of under the laws of Ontario,
Canada (the  "Company"),  for the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

1.   the Report fully complies, in all material respects,  with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.




By:  /S/ Michael Donaghy
   -----------------------
       Michael Donaghy
   Chief Financial Officer

Date:  July 15, 2005
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted **

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **

|                                       |                                                |                              |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                  |                                           |                         |
| Date: September              20, 2006 | By:                                       | /s/ Arne              Dunhem |
|                                       | Arne                Dunhem, Chief Executive Officer |
|                                       |                                                |

|                                       |                                                       |                              |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                  |                         |
| Date: September              20, 2006 | By:                                              | /s/ Arne              Dunhem |
|                                       | Arne                Dunhem, Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|                                       |                                                       |

----
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 3 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 4 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 5 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 6 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 7 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 8 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 9 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 10 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 11 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 12 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 13 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 14 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 15 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 16 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 17 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 18 of 19
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 19 of 19
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 10, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-494

Lower Tribunal No. 18-36132

________________

Judith Elaine Marsie-Hazen,

Appellant,

vs.

City of Miami Gardens,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark 

Blumstein, Judge.

Remer & Georges-Pierre, PLLC, and Peter M. Hoogerwoerd, for 

appellant.

Lydecker, LLP and Forrest L. Andrews, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 3 of 3