T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E VE L I A C AMP UZ AN O- B L AN C O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73915 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 857- 938 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E v el i a C am p u zan o -B l an co , a n at i v e an dci t i zen o f M ex i co , p et i t i o n s p ro se for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng her mo t i o n t o r e o p e n r e mo v a lp r o c e e d i n g s . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a lof am ot i on t o r e ope n and 

# FI LED DE C 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73915 2 r e v ie w d e n o v o qu e s tio n s o f law . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 400 F . 3d 785, 791- 92 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p art th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e B IA d idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n ind en yin g C am p u za n o -B lan co ’s m ot i on t o reopen as unt i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov erni ne m on ths af t er th e B I A ’s o r d e rd is m is s in g th e u n d e r ly in g ap p e a l, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) ( m ot i on t o r e ope n ge ne r a l l ym us tbe f i l e d w i thi n 90 day s of

the f i na lor de r ) , and C am pu zano -B l anco fai l ed t o p re se ntm at er i alevi dence of changed ci rc um st ance s in M e x ic o to qu a lif

yf o rth e r e g u la to rye x c e p tio n to th e f ilin g d e a d lin e , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; D el ga do -O rti

z v . H older , 60 0 F . 3d11 48 , 11 51 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( “ A sy l um i s notavai l abl e t o v i ct i m s of i nd i sc ri m i nat e vi ol ence , un l es s they ar e s in g le do u t o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d .” ) . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the B IA ’ s N ov em ber 2, 20 09 , order di s m i s s i ng C am puz ano- B l anc o’ s appe a lf r om the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on d e n y in g c an c e llatio n o f r e m o v a l b e c au s e th is p e titio nf o rr e v ie w is n o t tim e lya s to th a t o r d e r . Se e Si n gh v . I NS , 3 1 5 F .3 d1 1 8 6 , 1 1 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a l s o l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the B I A ’ s de c i s i on nott o i nvoke i t s s ua s p o n te au th o r ityto r e o p e n p r o c e e d in g s u n d e r8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( a ) . Se e Me j i aH erna ndezv. H

older , 6 3 3 F .3 d8 1 8 , 8 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) .10- 73915 3 F in a lly , w e r e

je c t C am p u z an o - B lan c o ’s c o n te n tio n th a t h e rr e m o v a l r e s u lts in th e d e p r iv a tio n o f

h e rc h ildr e n ’s du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts . See Cab re ra-A lvarez v . G on zales , 42 3 F . 3d10 06 , 10 12 -13 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.