alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, James C. Eckert, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 10, 2006



/s/ James C. EckertJames C. EckertChief Executive Officer




36
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-3 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-3 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-3 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-3 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 4 of 4
# EUR-Lex - 52004XC0122(10) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004XC0122(10)

**List of agencies and laboratories which third countries have made responsible for completing the documents which must accompany each consignment of wine imported into the Community (Article 29 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001) **

*
Official Journal C 017 , 22/01/2004 P. 0001 - 0047 *

List of agencies and laboratories which third countries have made responsible for completing the documents which must accompany each consignment of wine imported into the Community (Article 29 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001)

(2004/C 17/01)

(This list cancels and replaces the list published in the Official Journal of the European Union C 96 of 23 April 2003)

>TABLE>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 OCTOBER 3, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-10646 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 9:04-cr-80104-WPD-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AVOCHON T. POSTELL, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(October 3, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Avochon Postell, the appellant, is serving a sentence for bank robbery that

was imposed by the district court on November 19, 2004. On December 14, 2010,

he sent the district court a letter, which the court treated as a motion for drug

treatment while incarcerated. The court denied the motion, and Postell,

proceeding pro se, now appeals. 

The authority to grant Postell’s request lies with the Federal Bureau of

Prisons, not the district court. 8 U.S.C. 3621(b),(e); Cook v. Wiley, 208 F.3d 1314

(11 Cir. 2000). The court’s decision denying relief is therefore th

Affirmed. 

2
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-8 of Baylake Corp. of our report dated January 23, 2002,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Baylake Corp. and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholder equity and cash flows for each of
the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, which report appears in
Baylake's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.


Madison, Wisconsin                                 /s/ SMITH & GESTELAND, LLP
March 26, 2002                                     SMITH & GESTELAND, LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

 21MC102(AKH)

EDGAR ORELLANA, 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against100 CHURCH LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

 07CV5398(AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY 

ZAR REALTY 

MANAGEMENT CORP. OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. 

n/k/a SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. for the building located at 100 Church 

Street, (hereinafter “Zar/Sapir”) as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint adding new 

defendants not previously served filed in the above-referenced action, herein adopts Zar/Sapir 's 

Answer to Master Complaint dated August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World 

Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). ZAR/SAPIR has 

filed a Master Disclosure of Interested Parties in 21 MC 102 (AKH), and as such, is exempt from 

having to file such a disclosure in this specific matter, pursuant to the provisions of Case 

Management Order No. 4 (¶ J(2)). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT defendant, Zar/Sapir reserves its right to 

assert any defenses to which it is entitled, including but not limited to those enumerated in Case 

Management Order No. 4 (¶¶ D(1)-(5)). 

Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 20 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, Zar/Sapir demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action as 

against it, together with its costs and disbursements. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 December 4, 2007 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a 

SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor 

New York, New York 10005 

(212) 687-0100 

TO: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

All Counsel via ECF 

Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 20 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on December 4, 2007, I caused to be filed and 

served the following document electronically via the Court’s ECF system upon the parties: 

1. Notice of Zar Realty Management Corp.’s Adoption of Answer to Master 

Complaint. 

Dated: December 4, 2007 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 20 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 4 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 4 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                             AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

In connection with the year ended December 30, 2000, the Audit Committee: (1)
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended
December 30, 2000 with management; (2) discussed with the independent auditors,
the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61
(Communication with Audit Committees); and (3) received from the independent
auditors, written disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees) and
discussed with the auditors, the auditors' independence.

Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the
Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the last fiscal year for filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                               The Audit Committee

                                   Mr. Horst R. A. Hansen
                                   Chair

                                   Dr. Michael E. Crusemann
                                   Member

                                   Dr. Peter Muller
                                   Member


                                       66
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Baylake Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin L. LaLuzerne,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | (2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                    | 
|--------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/Kevin L.
  LaLuzerne                            
|                                                    | 
|Kevin L.
  LaLuzerne                               
|Senior Vice
  President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 31, 2008                                     

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Baylake Corp. and will be retained by Baylake
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: November 9, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ William Keiper

William KeiperChief Executive Officer and PresidentDated: November 9, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Thomas Liguori

Thomas LiguoriSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 21 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 21 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
# C_2004227EN.01000401.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/4

---

Commission Communication concerning the Financial Report (activity report and financial statements) of the ECSC in liquidation, at 31 December 2003

(2004/C 227/04)

On 29 July 2004 the Commission approved the Financial Report for 2003 (document C(2004) 2864), comprising the report on the activities of the ECSC in liquidation and its financial statements as at 31 December 2003, drawn up in accordance with Article 3 of Council Decision 2003/76/EC of 1 February 2003 and point 6 of the Annex to Council Decision 2003/77/EC of 1 February 2003.

This document can be consulted at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex (reference C(2004) 2864)

http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/publications/ecsc_en.htm

---
Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05307-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05307-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05307-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05307-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05307-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05307-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05307-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 21.1

EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|Subsidiary Name                         |  | State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or
Organization |  | Names Under Which
Each Subsidiary Does Business
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Evans & Sutherland Graphics Corporation |  | Utah                                                         |  | Evans & Sutherland Graphics Corporation        
|Xionix Simulation, Inc.                 |  | Georgia                                                      |  | Xionix Simulation, Inc.                        
|Evans & Sutherland Computer Limited     |  | United Kingdom                                               |  | Evans & Sutherland Computer Limited            
|E&S Foreign Sales Corporation           |  | Virgin Islands                                               |  | E&S Foreign Sales Corporation                  
|E&S Partners, Inc.                      |  | Utah                                                         |  | E&S Partners, Inc.                             
|REALimage, Inc.                         |  | Delaware                                                     |  | REALimage, Inc.                                

1

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM i3 MOBILE
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          93,155
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                       151
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,709
<PP&E>                                           6,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                     960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,064
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           247
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,473
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    86
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,841)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.93)


</TABLE>
### UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7032

ROBERT R. JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-1201-2) Submitted: June 23, 2004 Decided: July 6, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert R. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth M. McKeaney, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

### - 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert R. Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen the time to note an appeal from the court’s prior order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability is required to appeal the district court’s order denying Jones’ post-judgment motion. SeeReid v. Angelone , No. 03- 6146, slip op. at 7 (4th Cir. May 19, 2004). A certificate of appealability will not i ssue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Jones’ motion for transfer to another facility. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

### - 3 - the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANA ELIZABETH HENRIQUEZ

BERNAL; ESTELA ELIZABETH SANTOS

- A G UILERA,

Petitioners,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72323 Agency Nos. A095

- 734

- 320

A095

- 734

- 321

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted April 17, 2019 **
Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Ana Elizabeth Henriquez

- Bernal and Estela Elizabeth Santos

- A g uilera, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 25 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 72323

decision denying their applications for a sylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2 006). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the harm petitioners
suffered in El Salvador did not rise to the level of past persecution. See Nagoulko
v. INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 1016

- 17 (9th Cir. 2003) ( record did not compel the finding that petitioner experienced past persecution )

. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that petitioners failed to establish an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution in El Salvador

. See Hakeem v. INS , 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir. 2001) ( “[a]n applicant’s claim of persecution upon return is weakened, even undercut, when similarly

- situated family members continue to live in the country without incident” )

. Thus, petitioners’ asylum claim s fail.
In th is case, because petitioners failed to establish eligibility for asylum, they failed to demonstrate eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye , 453 F.3d
at 1190. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of petitioners’ CAT claim3 14

- 72323

because they failed to establish that it is more likely than not they will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of El Salvador

. See
Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). We reject petitioners’ contention that the BIA violated their due process rights. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to prevail on a due process claim).
In light of this disposition , we need not reach petitioners’ remaining
contentions. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) ( “As a general rule courts and agencies are not req uired to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach.”) (citation omitted)

. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.