alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Billy Covington, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Calabretta, J.), all rendered August 27, 1986, convicting him of rape in the first degree (six counts), sodomy in the first degree (six counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts), and robbery in the third degree (two counts) under indictment No. 2643/85; rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the first degree, and grand larceny in the second degree under indictment No. 3257/85; and robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 3258/85, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant, a former security guard in Rochdale Village, was found guilty of having committed a series of brutal sexual assaults and robberies in that area. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdicts were not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Not only did the complainants have an opportunity to observe the defendant at close range in good light, but their identifications were corroborated by evidence of striking similarities in the modus operand! employed by the defendant in each assault, and the presence of the defendant’s fingerprint on the rearview mirror of the car belonging to one of the complainants.

The defendant’s contentions respecting impermissible police bolstering of identification testimony are unpreserved for our review, and, in any event, would not require reversal in light of the "clear and strong” identification evidence *(see, People v*
      *595
      *Johnson,*32 NY2d 814, 816; *People v Mobley,*56 NY2d 584, 585).

The admission, over the defendant’s protest, of a torn and bloodstained skirt and jacket worn by one of his victims was not improper, since it was directly probative of one of the counts of the indictment against him. Moreover, the sight of the garments could be said to be less "unnerving” than the oral accounts of the defendant’s brutal acts *(see, e.g., People v Bell,*63 NY2d 796, 797).

In light of the brutish nature of these acts, the imposition of maximum sentences was not improper, despite the defendant’s lack of a prior criminal history *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 86).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### Vicki A. LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.; Highwoods Properties, Inc.; Western Industries-South, LLC; John Doe # 1, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-2527.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 28, 2013.

Vicki A. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alison Wright Feehan, Kutak Rock, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Janeen Beth Koch, Kalbaugh, Pfund & Messersmith, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court’s orders denying her three separate Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motions seeking reconsideration of the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Defendants in her action alleging premises liability and negligent application of a banned substance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P’ship,*No. 3:ll-cv-00447-HEH-DJN (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 2012, Jan. 3, 2013, & Jan. 31, 2013). We deny Lindsey’s motion to supplement the record on appeal and her motion to recuse several judges of this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 36-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 36-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
LEGEND
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               38,952
<SECURITIES>                                        167,324
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    208,716
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      208,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               134,993
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            253,420
<OTHER-SE>                                          (44,704)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        208,716
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     27,634
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         3,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   15,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (14,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (14,945)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (14,945)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.85)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 36 - International Charter Turns 20      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we get a rundown on the International Charter Space and Major Disasters.

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: When a disaster like a hurricane, flood or major wildfire hits a remote part of the world, the International Charter Space and Natural Disasters springs into action. The Charter’s members collect and distribute satellite-derived data that documents the damage, as well as derived products like as fire perimeter or structural damage maps – all at no cost to national emergency management agencies. In this episode of Eyes on Earth, we learn about the Charter and EROS’ involvement on the occasion of the collaborative organization’s 20th Anniversary.  

**Guest**: Mike Budde, USGS

**Host**: Tom Adamson

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: October 19, 2020

**More on the International Charter**: 
                            - International Charter Space and Major Disasters website
                            - Technological disasters monitoring on a large scale
                            - Disaster Management Training at EROS Prepares Volunteers for Duty

### Contacts
(August 10, 1987)

#### M. Teresa Anderson, Appellant, v T. S. Carbonaro, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), dated April 3, 1986, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of the defendant T. S. Carbonaro to dismiss the complaint as against him on the ground that service of process had never been effected upon him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence adduced at the hearing amply supports the determination of the Supreme Court, Richmond County. Mengano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

21MC102(AKH) 

EDGAR ORELLANA, 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against100 CHURCH LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

07CV5398(AKH) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel 

for Defendants 100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a 

SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. in the above-captioned action and all future 

correspondence and papers filed or serviced in connection with the above-captioned action are to 

be directed to the undersigned. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 November 30, 2007 

Yours etc., 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY 

MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a SAPIR 

REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP.

____________/s/________________

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062) 

100 Wall Street 

New York, NY 10005 

212 687-0100 

212 687-0659 (Fax) 

Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 16 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 30, 2007, I caused the following document 

to be electronically via the Court’s ECF system: 

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants 100 Church LLC and Zar Realty 

Management Corp. n/k/a Sapir Realty Management Corp.). 

The undersigned further certifies that on November 30, 2007, I caused the aforesaid 

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

1 Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

Dated: November 30, 2007 

 ___________/s/_______________

 Stanley Goos

Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 16 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 
-  Science 

#           Mars Ice Consortium      

  Active

      By Astrogeology Science Center      October 1, 2018    

            -              Overview           

**The Mars Ice Consortium is a joint project** between the USGS Astrogeology Research Program (Flagstaff, AZ) and the Arizona State University Mars Space Flight Facilty (Tempe, AZ) to bring together a single resource for the exploration of martian ices. Much of this research is done at the USGS Flagstaff Science Center.

This consortium and website were put together to facilitate exchange of information that pertains to Martian ice studies. Currently the consortium is made up of members from the USGS Astrogeology Team and Arizona State University. Group members are listed below.

Timothy Titus: ttitus@usgs.govDr. Titus is a Space Scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey in Flagstaff, AZ. His research interests include Mars polar processes, thermal inertia studies, and Mars dunes. Click here for more information on Tim's research interests.

Rose Hayward: rhayward@usgs.gov

Kyle Winfree: winfree@seas.upenn.edu

 

Consortium Links
                                - http://www.agu.org/journals/eo/eo0940/2009EO400003.pdf
                                - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063307002012"
                                - http://www.agu.org/journals/eo/eo0546/2005EO460006.pdf
                                - http://www.agu.org/journals/eo/eo0441/2004EO410005.pdf
                                - http://www.agu.org/pubs/eos-news/supplements/2009/titus_90_40.shtml

**The Mars Ice Consortium is a joint project** between the USGS Astrogeology Research Program (Flagstaff, AZ) and the Arizona State University Mars Space Flight Facilty (Tempe, AZ) to bring together a single resource for the exploration of martian ices. Much of this research is done at the USGS Flagstaff Science Center.

This consortium and website were put together to facilitate exchange of information that pertains to Martian ice studies. Currently the consortium is made up of members from the USGS Astrogeology Team and Arizona State University. Group members are listed below.

Timothy Titus: ttitus@usgs.govDr. Titus is a Space Scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey in Flagstaff, AZ. His research interests include Mars polar processes, thermal inertia studies, and Mars dunes. Click here for more information on Tim's research interests.

Rose Hayward: rhayward@usgs.gov

Kyle Winfree: winfree@seas.upenn.edu

 

Consortium Links
                                - http://www.agu.org/journals/eo/eo0940/2009EO400003.pdf
                                - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063307002012"
                                - http://www.agu.org/journals/eo/eo0546/2005EO460006.pdf
                                - http://www.agu.org/journals/eo/eo0441/2004EO410005.pdf
                                - http://www.agu.org/pubs/eos-news/supplements/2009/titus_90_40.shtml
AMRESCO, INC.
                                                                 
           EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 
                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                  1998           1997          1996
<S>                                          <C>            <C>            <C>                             
Basic:                                                         
   Net income (loss)                           $(69,171,000)   $56,224,000    $31,332,000
                                                               
 Weighted average common shares outstanding      43,161,919     35,692,030     27,254,346
 Contingently issuable shares                        54,724         12,735         14,297
 Restricted shares                                 (370,431)      (292,669)      (225,903)
   Total                                         42,846,212     35,412,096     27,042,740
                                                               
   Earnings (loss) per share                         $(1.61)         $1.59          $1.16
                                                               
Diluted:                                                       
 Net income (loss)                             $(69,171,000)   $56,224,000    $31,332,000
 Effects of convertible debt net of taxes                                       2,196,000
   Net income (loss)                           $(69,171,000)   $56,224,000    $33,528,000
                                                               
 Weighted average common shares outstanding      42,846,212     35,412,096     27,042,740
 Contingently issuable shares                                      292,669        225,903
 Additional shares assuming conversion of                          
 convertible debentures to 3,600,000 of                                   
 common stock in November 1995                                                  3,600,000
 Net effect of dilutive stock options based on                           
 the Treasury stock method using the average                 
 market price                                                      958,712        905,125
   Total                                        42,846,212      36,663,477     31,773,771
                                                               
   Earnings (loss) per share                        $(1.61)          $1.53          $1.06
</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 35 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 35 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 35 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 10 – Landsat and Water Quality      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn how Landsat is used to track the health of aquatic ecosystems.

**Click here** to subscribe to Eyes on Earth through our RSS feed.

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

**Download and Transcript Access**

**Summary**: We tend to associate Landsat satellites with what we see on solid Earth, but they can also tell us much about the health of our inland and coastal ecosystems. Landsat can be used to monitor harmful algal blooms, for example. Eyes on Earth guest Dr. Nima Pahlevan, a Landsat Science Team member, is part of a research team that tracks algal blooms worldwide using Landsat data.

**Guest**: Dr. Nima Pahlevan, Landsat Science Team

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: Brian Hauge

**Release date**: Dec. 2, 2019

**More on Landsat and Aquatic Health**: 
                            - Global Study Finds Algal Blooms Intensifying in Freshwater Lakes Worldwide
                            - Publication: Widespread global increase in intense lake phytoplankton blooms since the 1980s
                            - Inland Lakes, Rivers and Streams research at EROS

### Contacts
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Federal Advisory Committee for the End-to-End Review of the U.S. 
Nuclear Command and Control System

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of 
forthcoming meetings of the Federal Advisory Committee for the End-to-
End Review of the U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System (NCSS). The 
purpose of these meetings is to conduct a comprehensive and independent 
review of the NCCS positive measures to assure authorized use of 
nuclear weapons when directed by the President while assuring against 
unauthorized or inadvertent use. This meeting will be closed to the 
public.

DATES: June 5-7, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Department of Energy, Room GA257, 1000 Independence Avenue 
SW., Washington, DC 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William L. Jones, U.S. Nuclear 
Command and Control System Support Staff (NSS), Skyline 3, 5201 
Leesburg Pike, Suite 500, Falls Church, Virginia 22041, (703) 681-8681.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-11867 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
eurex us

August 10, 2005 SB AHUEN AL iEALMEN
Mr. Edward W. Colbert REQUESTED

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOI Oo
Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance a
Commodity Futures Trading Commission oO
1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

ow
m
rm
a
>
2

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) Regulation 145.9, us=
Futures Exchange, LLC (“Eurex US” or “Exchange”) hereby petitions the CFTC to maintain
the following information in connection with the Eurex US Russell incentive program as
confidential until further notice as against any requestor who files with the Commission a
request to inspect such information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”).

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Dear Mr. Colbert:

The basis for this petition for confidential treatment is CFTC Regulation 145.9(d)(1)(ii), in
that such information contains trade secrets and confidential information. I understand that
this petition will not be evaluated by the CFTC unless and until a FOIA request has been filed
for inspection of this subject matter. In that event, please contact me at 312.544.1076.

Very truly yours,

Matt Lisle
Chief of Compliance

CC: _ Riva Adriance
David Van Wagner
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTHUR LOPEZ,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MANUEL A. RAMIREZ, Presiding Judge;

CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS 4TH

DISTRICT DIVISION TWO,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 55224

D.C. No. 5:18

- cv

- 01835

- VBF

MRW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2021 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Arthur Lopez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S. C. § 1983 action alleging that a California court rule violated his due

process rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 55224

a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

. Jachetta v. United States , 653 F.3d

898, 903 (9 th Cir. 201 1). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Lopez’s action because defendants are

entitled to immunity , and to the extent Lopez seeks injunctive relief, his action is

barred by the Younger abstention doctrine

. See Simmons v. Sacramento Cty.

Superior Court , 318 F.3d 1156, 1161 (9 th Cir. 2003) (state courts, as an arm of

state government, have Eleventh Amendment immunity); Ashelman v. Pope , 793

F.2d 1072, 1075 (9 th Cir. 1986) (en banc) (judges are absolutely immune from

damage liability for acts performed in their official capacities ) ; see also Younger v.

Harris , 401 U.S. 37, 43 (1971) (recognizing the longstanding public policy against

federal court interference with state court proceedings )

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend

because amendment would have been futile. See Gordon v. City of Oakland , 627

F.3d 1092, 1094 (9 th Cir. 2010) ( setting forth standard of review and grounds for

dismissing without leave to amend).

Lopez’s motion for extension of time to file a supplemental reply brief

(Doc ket Entry No. 26) is denied.

AFFIRMED.