alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Exhibit 23.2


                          Independent Auditor's Consent





The Board of Directors
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-98203 on Form S-8 of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. of our report dated November 4,
2002, with respect to the balance sheets of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. as of
September 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of operations, changes
in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report
appears in the September 30, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Hennessy
Advisors, Inc.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


San Francisco, California
December 19, 2002
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 3-2 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

KLEVER VASQUEZ,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-4520-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 29 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 17, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 29 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
----

----

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | /s/                  David G.                  Derrick                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David                  G. Derrick                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | Chief                  Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | RemoteMDx,                  Inc.                                                                                                                                                           |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | /s/                  Michael G.                  Acton                       |
|   | Michael                  G. Acton                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                   |

----
144 So. 38

#### Mollie S. FOSTER et al. v. STATE.

6 Div. 203.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 6, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 10, 1932.

L. D. Gray, of Jasper, for petitioners.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Mollie S. Foster and Lankford White for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Foster et al. v. State, 144 So. 37.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### LAURA ANN KRACK *v.*ACTION MOTORS CORPORATION

*Joseph DaSilva, Neal P. Rogan*and *Marc J. Grenier,*in support of the petition.

*Richard F. Wareing,*in opposition.

Decided April 12, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 687 (AC 24876), is denied.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | This                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August                8, 2007 | /s/Ronald                L. Rossetti        |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                            | Ronald                L. Rossetti           |
|                                            | Chief Executive                Officer |
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Clara M. Steiger, Deceased. Patricia Muldowney, Appellant; Richard Dornhofer, Respondent.

Decree unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree with the Surrogate that, as a matter of law, the evidence shows that the testatrix was competent when she executed her will and that the objectant failed to meet her burden of showing that the will was the product of undue influence. (Appeal from decree of Chautauqua County Surrogate’s Court, Adams, S. — set aside jury verdict.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

MIGUEL URGILES (AND WIFE MARTHA 

URGILES) 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OF AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 05400 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower B Co L.P. and WFP Tower B Co. 

GP Corp. (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the 

Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield 

Parties' Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed 

in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October \8 2007 

Faust, C~oet~, Sche~ber~ Blee, LLP 

By: PNilli 

ys 

Two ~ect~fr St~·eel;';~Of~:;I~'~;:::I~: 

New York, NY 10006 

(212)363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Laura M. Bray, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CLAIMSNET.COM INC.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) [Reserved]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: October 25, 2005                 /s/ Laura M. Bray   Laura M. Bray   Chief Financial Officer
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

ANTWI SAPI~UEL 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OF AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 5399 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC Co. LLC 

Erkla WFP Tower A Co. L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC G.P. Corp. E~k/a WFP 

Tower A Co. GP Corp., BFP Tower C Co. LLC, BFP Tower C MM LLC, WFP Tower 

D Co. L.P., WFP Tower D Co. GP Corp. and WFP Retail Co. L.P. (collectively the 

"Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in 

the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' Amended Answer to 

Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the matter of~n re World 

Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 23 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

January 31 2008 

Schenker & Blee, LLP 

B)4: Wil~am J. Smith~(WT~S~37) 

for the Brookfield Parties 

Tv~Redtor Str~et,20"]Fi;ddr::.: 

New Pork, NY 10006 

(212)363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 23 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05371-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05371-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of KnuSaga Corporation ("KnuSaga") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Luptak, Vice
President, Finance, General Counsel, and Chief Financial Officer of KnuSaga,
certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the
          financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Jerry Luptak
---------------------------
     Jerry Luptak
     Chief Financial Officer
     November 24, 2003
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 12 of 12
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT  RULE 13a-14(a) AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven Tamburo, Chief Financial Officer of Optelecom-NKF, Inc. (the "Registrant") certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Optelecom-NKF, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods presented in this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant, as of, and for the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for
the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



/s/ Steven Tamburo

---

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 27, 2008

---



QuickLinks
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00284

- CR

The State of Texas v. Steve Marston
On Appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 11

- 1

- 25662

- D

JUDGMENT The judgment issued by this Court on June 18, 2015, is hereb y withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial cour t should be reversed and the ca se remanded. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and the ca se REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 23 , 2015
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2402

DONOVAN R. MURRAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-2589)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donovan R. Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears

Estabrook, III, Paula Keyser Speck, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the tax court's order upholding the

Commissioner's assessment of deficiencies and penalties with

respect to his 1990, 1991, and 1993 federal income tax liabilities.

We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

tax court. Murray v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 2589-95 (U.S. Tax

Ct., June 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 

#           USGS Astrogeology Software Management      

      By Astrogeology Science Center

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Maps 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  Software 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

The Astrogeology Science Center (ASC) manages a diverse portfolio of open-source software projects that support the planetary science community. Software projects are managed openly and transparently. These pages provide information for learning about the past, current, and future plans for ASC software.

### Previous Fiscal Year Plans and Status

                        - Fiscal Year 2021
                        - Fiscal Year 2020
                        - Fiscal Year 2019

### Long Term Plans

                        - 2023 - 2028 Strategic Plan
                        - 2020 Long Term Plan

                      -  - link                USGS Astrogeology Software Management - 2018 Special Action Team Review              
In 2018 a NASA directed Special Action Team (SAT) reviewed the ASC software portfolio with a specific focus on the Integrated System for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS). The SAT worked with the ASC to develop the initial findings and has developed a response plan. The artifacts from this effort are a findings document, an ASC response document, and a tabular, quick reference.
  link  USGS Astrogeology Software Management - 2018 Special Action Team Review
In 2018 a NASA directed Special Action Team (SAT) reviewed the ASC software portfolio with a specific focus on the Integrated System for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS). The SAT worked with the ASC to develop the initial findings and has developed a response plan. The artifacts from this effort are a findings document, an ASC response document, and a tabular, quick reference.
Learn More**