alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
711 F.2d 1076

#### Fielding M. McGEHEE, III, Appellant v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.

No. 82-1096.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 24, 1983.

John F. Cordes, Atty., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Leonard .Schaitman, Atty. U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Stanley S. Harris, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, for appellee.

*149On Petition for Rehearing

Before WRIGHT, EDWARDS and BORK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal was decided on January 4, 1983 and reported at 697 F.2d 1095. The CIA has submitted a petition for rehearing, requesting reconsideration of the rulings set forth in Parts III and IV of our opinion, 697 F.2d at 1105-12, 1112-14. We are persuaded by the agency’s argument that it has not acted in “bad faith” in processing McGehee’s request for documents. Accordingly, we hereby grant the petition for rehearing and vacate Part IV of the opinion. Finding no reason any longer to doubt the credibility of the agency’s affidavits, we approve the District Court’s determination that the CIA adequately demonstrated that exemptions 1 and 3 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(1), (3) (1976), entitle it to withhold, in whole or in part, 44 documents responsive to McGehee’s claim, and we affirm the court’s grant of summary judgment to the agency insofar as it pertains to those documents. All other aspects of our original opinion are reaffirmed.

*So ordered.*
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

TN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

WILSON SANCHEZ 

NOTICE OP THE 

BROOKEIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OIi' AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 05386 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower D Co. L.P. and WFP Tower D 

Co. GP Corp. (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the 

Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield 

Parties' Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed 

in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each ofthem, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October 1~ 2007 

Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee, LLP 

Byl/WilliQm J. Smith·~~TS9137) 

Atfomev$for-~e Brookfield Parties 

T,a~ Rec 

New NY 100:06 

(212) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

###### Open Meeting of the Federal Interagency Committee on Emergency Medical 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

FEMA announces the following open meeting. 

*Name:*                         Federal Interagency Committee on Emergency Medical Services (FICEMS).                     

*Date of Meeting:*                         June 7, 2001.                     

*Place:*                         Room N-408, Building N, National Emergency Training Center (NETC), 16825 South Seton Avenue in Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727.                     

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m.                     

*Proposed Agenda:*                         Review and submission for approval of previous FICEMS Committee Meeting Minutes; Ambulance Design Subcommittee and Technology Subcommittee Reports; presentation of member agency reports; reports of other Interested parties; and a discussion on Data Collection on the Use of Automatic External Defibrillators (AED) by Federal agencies.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting will be open to the public with limited seating available on a first-come, first-served basis. Members of the general public who plan to attend the meeting should contact Cindy Wivell, United States Fire Administration, 16825 South Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727, (301) 447-1083, on or before Tuesday, June 5, 2001. 

                    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available upon request 30 days after they have been approved at the next FICEMS Committee Meeting on September 6, 2001. The minutes will also be posted on the United States Fire Administration website at                     *http://www.usfa.fema.gov/​ems/​ficems.htm*                     within 30 days after their approval at the September 6, 2001 FICEMS Committee Meeting.                 

Dated: May 4, 2001. 

Kenneth O. Burris, Jr., 

Acting U.S. Fire Administrator, United States Fire Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-12034 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-08-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal** **Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 19, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. Pintsopoulos
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              May
                6, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quantum Materials Corp.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Squires, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ STEPHEN SQUIRESStephen SquiresChief Executive OfficerAugust 5, 2011
#                                                                         USS George Washington Earns Distinguished Retention Excellence Award                                                                    

##### by Lt. j.g. Caroline Leya

04 March 2023NEWPORT NEWS, Virginia  -- 
                Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday officiates a re-enlistment aboard  USS George Washington. The ship received the FY-22 Retention Excellence Best in Class award for U.S. Pacific Fleet.                             230302-N-SP277-1005                            Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday officiates a re-enlistment aboard  USS George Washington. The ship received the FY-22 Retention Excellence Best in Class award for U.S. Pacific Fleet.             SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Petty Officer 1st Class Marc CuencaVIRIN: 230302-N-SP277-1005NEWPORT NEWS, Va. - The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) received the FY-22 Retention Excellence Best in Class award for U.S. Pacific Fleet, February 13.

“Receiving Best in Class, on top the Retention Excellence Award, is distinct because it is the first time we competed within our type command with new challenging requirements, but GW has shown that nothing is too difficult for us and that we are resilient,” said George Washington’s Command Career Counselor, Chief Navy Counselor (SW/AW) Dalila Rodriguez.The Best in Class award, was a new addition in 2022 and is given to the top command in each of 18 different sea duty platform types. Each platform type will see a winner named from U.S. Fleet Forces Command and U.S. Pacific Fleet.“We are the only carrier in the Pacific Fleet to receive this award,” noted Rodriguez. “It really showcases the work ethic and dedication of both the command and departmental career counselors. It also reemphasizes a command’s commitment towards promoting a culture of excellence and the need to retain the best and brightest talent.”The ship’s commanding officer, Capt. Brent Gaut, expressed his pride in the team that led to the ship receiving the honor.“Our command, department, and divisional career counselors ask for nothing but still give so much. Bravo Zulu to them for their leadership ability, fight, and grit to help us realize how great we can be in taking care of our Warfighters,” said Gaut.With the authorization of the award by Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet, the ship is able to fly the Retention Excellence Award pennant and paint the ship’s anchor gold.

Tags:
**USS George Washington (CVN 73)**Retention Excellence Award**Newport News

Terms:
**Navy Headlines**CVN73
Case 1:07-cv-05402-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05402-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 48 – Satellites and the Forest Census      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we hear how the Nation’s forest census aids satellite-based mapping efforts.

 

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: It’s possible to map vegetation type with Landsat, but getting the maps right requires more than satellites alone. The teams behind LANDFIRE use an extensive network of ground control points to check their work, thereby bolstering the reliability and utility of their multi-layer GIS product suite. On this episode of Eyes on Earth, we meet scientist Karen Schleeweis, who tells us about LANDFIRE’s largest single source of ground truth data, a U.S. Forest Service program called Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA).

**Guest**: Karen Schleeweis, FIA Techniques Research Band Lead/LANDFIRE Liaison, U.S. Forest Service

**Host**: John Hult

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: April 19, 2021

**More on Forest Inventory and Analysis**: 
                            - FIA homepage
                            - FIA State Fact Sheets
                            - Applications of the United States Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis dataset: A review and future directions
                            - Treesearch
                            - VIDEO: Forest Inventory and Analysis and You

### Contacts
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                         10,800
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  76,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,500
<INVENTORY>                                    73,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              179,000 
<PP&E>                                        320,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                133,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                410,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         117,300
<BONDS>                                       161,500<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       27,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     81,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  410,100
<SALES>                                       273,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              273,000
<CGS>                                         130,100         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 239,600<F2> 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              7,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            15,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.89
<FN>

<F1> INCLUDES: CAPITALIZED LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND LONG-TERM DEBT OF $13,000 AND
     $148,500, RESPECTIVELY.

<F2> INCLUDES: COST OF GOODS SOLD AND S, G & A EXPENSES OF $130,100 AND 
$109,500, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
A92A1200.

#### BROWN v. THE STATE.

(421 SE2d 340)

Decided July 14, 1992.

*Johnston & Brannen, Sam L. Brannen, Jack B. Williamson, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Rene J. Martin III, District Attorney,*for appellee.

Pope, Judge.

Appellant/defendant Cecil Claude Brown appeals his conviction • for two counts of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. In his sole enumeration of error, defendant contends that the State failed to establish venue.

It was established at defendant’s trial held in Statesboro, which is located in Bulloch County, that the events leading to defendant’s arrest and subsequent conviction occurred at a place called Bubba’s located on 301 South just outside the Statesboro city limits. This court will take judicial notice that Statesboro is centrally located in Bulloch County and that locations just outside the city limits would therefore be located in Bulloch County. See *Jackson v. State,*177 Ga. App. 718 (341 SE2d 274) (1986); *Williams v. State,*162 Ga. App. 680 (1) (292 SE2d 560) (1982).

In this case venue was not contested at trial and therefore slight proof of venue is sufficient. *Jackson,*177 Ga. App. at 719. The evidence discussed above was sufficient to allow a rational trier of fact to determine that venue was proper in Bulloch County. Id.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carley, P. J., and Johnson, J., concur.*
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Partners of 

Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74212) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-106195 and 333-106239) of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) of our reports dated February 28, 2008 withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ capital and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of the Partnership.

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Houston, Texas 

February 28, 2008
Clear All

        30 March 2023    

#                     USFF RESILIENCY SYMPOSIUM OPENING REMARKS                 

                REMARKS AS DELIVERED Thank you, Darren, for the kind introduction.Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today and allowing me to kick off our first-ever Resiliency Symposium.So, let’s start off by seeing who we have here today. Go ahead and raise your hands when I call some of the            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-5 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-5 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20048 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LUCIO OSCAR CHAVEZ HERNANDEZ, also known as Lucio Oscar Chavez, also known as Lucio O. Chavez, also known as Lucio Oscar Chavez

- Hernandez, also known as Lucio Chavez Hernandez, also known as Salvador Peres , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 426

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lucio Oscar Chavez
Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chavez Hernandez h a s not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2 1 , 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20048 Document: 00512540304 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 13

- 20048

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from fur ther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-20048 Document: 00512540304 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014