alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Emile J. Jordan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/S/ EMILE J. JORDAN
----------------------------
EMILE J. JORDAN
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATED DECEMBER 19, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pat Burkett, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leon Becker, J.), rendered on November 13, 1987, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kassal, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the andrews
Group Incorporated Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK> 0000277025
<NAME> ANDREWS GROUP INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              26
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                      275
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (46)
<INVENTORY>                                         78
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   576
<PP&E>                                             132
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (33)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              446
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F1>
<COMMON>                                             0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,244)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,332
<SALES>                                            746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   746
<CGS>                                              536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       4
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (7)
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                     (670)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
        

<FN>
<F1> 
Amounts inaplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Operations are reported as  
0 herein.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 32 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 32 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 593 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the authorized concurrent 

receipt of disability severance pay from the Department of Defense 

and compensation for the same disability under any law administered 

by the Department of Veterans Affairs to cover all veterans who have 

a combat-related disability, as defined under section 1413a of such title. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2009 

Mr. SMITH of Washington (for himself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, 

Mr. ELLISON, Mr. WALZ, Mr. MITCHELL, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. HINCHEY, 

Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. GORDON of Tennessee, Mr. ROSS, Mr. MCGOVERN, 

Mr. NYE, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. KAGEN, Mr. MICHAUD, Ms. 

TSONGAS, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the authorized concurrent receipt of disability severance pay 

from the Department of Defense and compensation for 

the same disability under any law administered by the 

Department of Veterans Affairs to cover all veterans 

who have a combat-related disability, as defined under 

section 1413a of such title. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 593 IH

1 SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RECEIPT OF DISABILITY SEVER2 ANCE PAY FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF DE3 FENSE AND COMPENSATION FOR THE SAME 

4 DISABILITY UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY 

5 THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 (a) NO DEDUCTION.—Section 1212(d)(2) of title 10, 

7 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘disability in8 curred in line of duty in a combat zone or incurred during 

9 performance of duty in combat-related operations as des10 ignated by the Secretary of Defense.’’ and inserting ‘‘com11 bat-related disability (as defined in section 1413a of this 

12 title).’’. 

13 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.— 

14 The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect 

15 as of January 28, 2008, as if included in section 1646 

16 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

17 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 472), as enacted. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
(82 South. 894)

#### WHEATON v. HURST et al.

(6 Div. 923.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 30, 1919.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; D. A. Greene, Judge. Action between Agnes I. Wheaton and George W. Hurst and others. From an adverse decision, the former appeals.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.

H. C. Alford, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Beddow & Oberdorfer, of Birmingham, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
Exhibit 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

By signing below, each of the undersigned  officers hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge,  (i) this report fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Union
Community Bancorp.

Signed this 13th day of August 2003.




/s/ J. Lee Walden                                /s/ Alan L. Grimble
------------------------------                   -------------------------------
J. Lee Walden                                    Alan L. Grimble
Chief Financial Officer                          Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Union  Community  Bancorp and will
be retained by Union  Community  Bancorp and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VIRNETX INC., LEIDOS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2018-1197

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:10-cv-00417-RWS, 

Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for all plaintiffs-appellees. Plaintiff-appellee 

VirnetX Inc. also represented by JAMES A. BARTA,

RAYINER HASHEM, MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR.; 

ALLISON MILEO GORSUCH, New York, NY; BRADLEY 

WAYNE CALDWELL, JASON DODD CASSADY, JOHN AUSTIN 

CURRY, Caldwell Cassady & Curry, Dallas, TX. 
 DONALD SANTOS URRABAZO, Urrabazo Law, P.C., Los 

Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee Leidos, Inc. Also 

represented by ANDY TINDEL, Mann, Tindel & Thompson, 

Tyler, TX. 

 WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and 

Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. 

Also represented by REBECCA A. BACT, MARK 

CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, LAUREN B. FLETCHER; THOMAS 

GREGORY SPRANKLING, Palo Alto, CA; BRITTANY BLUEITT 

AMADI, Washington, DC. 

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and 

REYNA, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

January 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF     Document 36      Filed 06/10/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF     Document 36      Filed 06/10/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF     Document 36      Filed 06/10/2008     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 7 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 7 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 7 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 7 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 4 of 4
(82 South. 893)

#### DRAKE v. GULF STATES STEEL CO.

(7 Div. 945.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 3, 1919.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; J. C. Blackwood, Judge.

E. O. McCord and W. J. Boykin, both of Gadsden, for appellant.

O. R. Hood, of Gadsden, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellee.
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manuel Fernandez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on October 24, 1985, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
(83 South. 927)

#### Ex parte MARSH.

(4 Div. 805.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 21, 1918.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals. Petition for certiorari by Sid Marsh and another to review judgment of the Court of Appeals (16 Ala. App. 597, 80 South. 171), affirming conviction.

Writ denied.

R. H. Arrington, of Montgomery, for appellant.

E. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

GARDNER, J.

Petition of Sid Marsh and Rushing Marsh for certiorari to review and r.e-vise the judgment of the Court of Appeals, rendered in the case of Sid Marsh and Rushing Marsh v. State of Alabama, 16 Ala. App. 597, 80 South. 171. Writ denied.
RECEIVED
CRTC.

Ga] NEW YORK
705 JIN-9 PH 3: 22 BOARD OF TRADE*

World Financial Center
OFC. OF THE SECRETARIAT One North End Avenue

New York, New York 10282
BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

05-23
June 9, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Amendment to Rule 9.18 -
Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act and Regulation 40.6

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and
Commission Regulation 40.6, the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. (“Exchange”)
submits, by written certification, an amendment to Cocoa Rule 9.18, attached as Exhibit A.

The amendment moves the Growth of Sanchez from Group C, which describes par
delivery growths, to Group B, which provides for a delivery premium of ninety dollars ($90) per
ton. The amendment is consistent with current and recent historical cash market differentials for
cocoa.

The Exchange certifies that the amendment complies with the requirements of the
Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The amendment was adopted by the Exchange’s Board of Governors on June 8, 2005.
The amendment will become effective with the first contract that has no open interest, which at
the time of the filing of this submission is the May 2007 delivery month, and all subsequent


delivery months. No substantive opposing views were expressed by members or others with
respect to the amendments.

-2-

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at

jfassler@nybot.com or 212-748-4084.

Sincerely,

Jill S. Fassler
Vice President
Associate General Counsel

ce: Riva Adriance
Thomas Leahy
CFTC, Division of Market Oversight
Allen Cooper
CFTC, New York Regional Office


(In the text of the amendment below, additions are underlined and deletions are bracketed and
lined out.)

Rule 9.18. Grading Cocoa
* * *

(b) The Growth, Description, Condition, Count and Grade of Cocoa which may be delivered on an
Exchange Futures Contract are as follows:
(i) Growth and Description

The following Growths and Descriptions of Cocoa, as such Growths and Descriptions may from
time to time be known in the trade, may be delivered at the premiums or at par as indicated below:

Group A—Addition of $160—per metric ton

Ghana—Main Crop Nigeria—Main Crop
Ivory Coast—Main Crop Sierra Leone—Main Corp
Lome—Main Crop

Group B—Addition of $80—per metric ton

Arriba (Ecuador) Ivory Coast Salvador

Bahai (Brazil) Jamaica Samoa

Cameroon Indonesia-Java Sanchez (Dominican Republic’
Sri Lanka Liberia—Main Crop San Thorme
Chiapas (Mexico) Masie Nguema Surinam

Costa Rican (Fernando Poo) Tabasco (Mexico)
Ghana—Mid-Crop New Guinea Trinidad

Grenada New Hebrides Venezuela
Guatemala Nicaragua Victoria (Brazil)
Hispaniolas (Dominican Republic) Nigeria—Light Crop Zaire

Honduras Panama

Group C—At Par
Bolivia
Haiti
Indonesia-Sulawesi
Malaysia
Para (Brazil)

Peru

[Sanchez (DominicanRepublic)] and all other growths not presently specified above.
[REMAINDER OF RULE UNCHANGED]

EXHIBIT A
#### PHOENIX WINDOWS, INC. *v.*VIKING CONSTRUCTION, INC.

*Neal L. Moskow,*in support of the petition.

*John H. Hanks,*in opposition.

Decided April 27, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 74 (AC 24297), is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration on Aging 

          - [Program Announcement No. AoA-01-04] 

# AGENCY:

Administration on Aging, HHS. 

# ACTION:

                        Request for applications for a                         *National Center for Family Friends/Volunteer Senior Aides*                         to provide training and technical assistance to current projects, fund and assist new projects, and develop and implement new models to demonstrate alternative funding strategies.                     

# SUMMARY:

                        The Administration on Aging announces that under this program announcement it will hold a competition for a grant award for                         *one*                         (1) project at a federal share of approximately $485,000 per year for a project period of two years. The purpose of the project is to support a national center to further build and support a national system of Family Friends/Volunteer Senior Aides projects, and to develop and implement new models to demonstrate alternative funding strategies for local program replication/expansion.                     

The deadline date for the submission of applications is June 15, 2001. Public and/or nonprofit agencies, organizations, or institutions are eligible to apply. To be considered for funding, however, the applicant must be experienced in providing services to the designated populations inherent to the Family Friends/VSA programs. 

Application kits are available by writing to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging, Office of Program Development, 330 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 4264, Washington, DC 20201, by calling 202/619-2987 or on the web at http://www.aoa.gov/​t4/​fy2001. 

Dated: May 4, 2001. 

Norman L. Thompson, 

Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aging. 

[FR Doc. 01-11730 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10.bb

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                     HUFFY CORPORATION MASTER BENEFIT TRUST
                              AGREEMENT AS RESTATED
                     --------------------------------------

WHEREAS, Huffy Corporation (the "Company") and Bank One Trust Company, N.A. (the
"Trustee") entered into a Master Benefit Trust Agreement as Restated, effective
June 9, 1995 (the "Agreement");

WHEREAS, the Company and the Trustee desire to amend the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Trustee adopt the following Amendment to the
Agreement, effective January 1, 1996:

1.    SCHEDULE B. Schedule B is hereby amended to include the following plan:  
      Deferred Compensation Plan II, effective January 1, 1996.

2.    AFFIRMATION. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement remains
      unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Trustee have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date first written above.


                                       HUFFY CORPORATION


                                       By:  /S/ NANCY A. MICHAUD
                                           ----------------------------------


                                       Its: VICE PRESIDENT - GENERAL COUNSEL
                                           ----------------------------------
                                            AND SECRETARY
                                           --------------- 

                                       BANK ONE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.


                                       By:  /S/ LOUIS W. FELDMANN, III
                                           ----------------------------------

                                       Its: VICE PRESIDENT
                                           ----------------------------------
Clear All

        17 November 2022    

                    Carrier Strike Group Ten Participates in Humanitarian Mine Action in Split, Croatia                 
                SPLIT, Croatia - The Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Team assigned to Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 10 took part in the eighth iteration of the Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) in Split, Croatia, Oct. 24 – Nov. 11, 2022.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05723-KMK Document 3 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05723-KMK Document 3 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Crespo, Appellant.

Reargument of an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered May 29, 1987, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By order of this court dated May 9, 1988, the sentence was affirmed *(People v Crespo,*140 AD2d 1016) and by order of this court dated January 26, 1989, *inter alia,*the defendant’s *pro se*motion, *inter alia,*for reargument was granted and the parties were directed to serve and file briefs on the defendant’s appeal from the judgment.

Ordered that upon reargument, the judgment is affirmed.

By failing to challenge the sufficiency of his factual allocution before the trial court, the defendant has not .preserved the issue for appellate review as a matter of law *(see, People v*
      *574
      *Lopez,*71 NY2d 662; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). In any event, "[a] bargained guilty plea to a lesser crime makes unnecessary a factual basis for the particular crime confessed” *(People v Clairborne, 29*NY2d 950, 951; *see, People v Tavarez,*151 AD2d 793). " '[TJhere is no suggestion in the record or dehors the record that the guilty plea was improvident or baseless’ ” *(People v Moore,*91 AD2d 1050, quoting from *People v Fooks, 21*NY2d 338, 350, *cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York,*393 US 1067). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.