alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        01 August 2023    

                    Diving deep into naval history, Navy Diving Executive Steering Committee celebrates origins of U.S. Navy diving community                 
                VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. – They may dive the world over, but the humble beginnings of U.S. Navy divers first began on August 1, 1882 in local waters off of Newport, Rhode Island according to Navy leaders who recently voted on establishing an official birth date for the community.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0266 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0266

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending for the 22nd time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (phthalates in toys and childcare articles) (5467/1/2005 - C6-0092/2005 - 1999/0238(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 157 E , 06/07/2006 P. 0057 - 0057 *

P6_TA(2005)0266

Phthalates in toys and childcare articles ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending for the 22nd time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (phthalates in toys and childcare articles) (5467/1/2005 — C6-0092/2005 — 1999/0238(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (5467/1/2005 — C6-0092/2005),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(1999)0577) [2],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0196/2005),

- having regard to the Commission statements which are annexed to this legislative resolution and which will be published together with the legislative act in the Official Journal,

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 121, 24.4.2001, p. 410.

[2] OJ C 116 E, 26.4.2000, p. 14.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed January 29, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-00468-CR

ALEXIS DANIEL GRANADOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-83352-2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Alexis Daniel Granados pleaded guilty before a jury to the offense of aggravated robbery 

with a deadly weapon, a motor vehicle. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed 

punishment at six years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she 

concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the 

record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 

S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets 

requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant 

of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 
–2–

S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to 

Anders brief filed by counsel).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the 

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support 

the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

170468F.U05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ALEXIS DANIEL GRANADOS, 

Appellant

No. 05-17-00468-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-83352-2015.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. 

Justices Fillmore and Stoddart participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered this 29th day of January, 2018.
Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 16 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 16 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF THE


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Peter
J. Bergmann, the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer of YP Corp.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of YP
Corp.





Date:
      May 16, 2005
    */s/
      Peter J. Bergmann*Peter
      J. BergmannChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer







I, W.
Chris Broquist, the Chief Financial Officer of YP Corp., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of YP Corp.





Date:
      May 16, 2005
    */s/
      W. Chris Broquist*W.
      Chris BroquistChief
      Financial Officer
Clothes Dryer 

Fire Safety

Did you know?

You are at higher risk of having a clothes dryer fire if you don’t clean your 

lint filter and dryer vents.

Follow these simple safety tips to prevent a clothes dryer fire in your home. 

ĵ Have your dryer installed and serviced by a professional. 

ĵ Do not use the dryer without a lint filter. Clean the lint filter before and after 

each cycle. 

ĵ Do not forget to clean the back of the 

dryer where lint can build up. 

ĵ Check the venting system behind the 

dryer to make sure that it is not damaged, 

crushed or restricted. 

ĵ Make sure that the outdoor vent covering 

opens when the dryer is operating.

For more information and free fire-safety resources, visit

www.usfa.fema.gov.
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 27 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 27 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 27 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### Kimberly Rene BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-1709.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 30, 2013.

Decided: May 6, 2013.

Wolodymyr Cybriwsky, Prestonsburg, Kentucky, for Appellant. Eric P. Kress-man, Regional Chief Counsel, Victor Pane, Supervisory Attorney, M. Jared Littman, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Timothy J. Heaphy, United States Attorney, Rick Mountcastle, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kimberly Rene Baker appeals the district court’s orders: granting summary judgment to the Commissioner and upholding the decision of the Commissioner denying Baker’s application for disability *229insurance benefits and supplemental security income; and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Baker v. Social Sec. Comm’r,*No. 1:11-cv-00040-JPJ-PMS (W.D.Va. Feb. 16, 2012; Apr. 2, 2012).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 We reject Baker’s claim that she is entitled to a sentence six remand on the basis of a subsequent administrative decision awarding benefits. *See*42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006). The subsequent decision pertains to an application for benefits filed by Baker after the date of the unfavorable decision that is the subject of this appeal. "[A] subsequent favorable decision itself, as opposed to the evidence supporting the subsequent decision, does not constitute new and material evidence under § 405(g).” *Allen v. Commissioner,*561 F.3d 646, 653 (6th Cir.2009). Baker has not met her burden of showing that evidence relied upon in reaching the favorable decision pertains to the period under consideration in this appeal. We conclude that the evidence is not material to the earlier, unfavorable decision.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6203

In Re: BRIAN DOYLE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-04-22255)

Submitted: March 2, 2005 Decided: March 18, 2005

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Doyle, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Brian Doyle petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the

district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district

court to act. He also requests a “speedy hearing” in this court.

We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. We

deny Doyle’s motion for a speedy hearing as moot. Accordingly,

while we grant Doyle’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in

this court, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Following is a list of the subsidiaries of Connecticut Water Service, Inc., each
of which, unless otherwise indicated, is wholly owned by the company either
directly or through another subsidiary. Second-tier subsidiaries are listed
under the name of the parent subsidiary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                                          STATE OF INCORPORATION
<S>                                                           <C>
REGISTRANT:

Connecticut Water Service, Inc.                               Connecticut

SUBSIDIARIES:

The Connecticut Water Company                                 Connecticut
Chester Realty, Inc.                                          Connecticut
New England Water Utility Services, Inc.                      Connecticut
Connecticut Water Emergency Services, Inc.                    Connecticut
The Unionville Water Company                                  Connecticut
The Gallup Water Service, Incorporated                        Connecticut
Crystal Water Utilities Corporation                           Connecticut
         The Crystal Water Company of Danielson               Connecticut
Barnstable Holding Company                                    Connecticut
         The Barnstable Water Company                         Massachusetts
         BARLACO                                              Massachusetts
</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  News 

Breadcrumb-  News 

##   Streamgages Play Critical Role During Atmospheric Rivers

How USGS Streamgages Work - video

      By California Water Science Center      February 2, 2024    

An atmospheric river is a long narrow corridor of concentrated water vapor. Streamgages play a crucial role in an atmospheric river event by providing data used in monitoring and managing water resources, particularly in the context of flooding waterways. These devices offer real-time information on water levels in rivers and streams, enabling authorities to closely track changes in flow dynamics.

Monitoring High Water Events

Read the full article here.

Today, the USGS operates one of the largest streamgaging enterprises in the world, with more than 11,800 streamgages operating in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Guam. Most USGS streamgages are funded in partnership with one or more of about 1,500 Federal, state, local and Tribal agencies and organizations. Each streamgage provides vital information that can help protect lives and property, as well as ensure adequate water supply for the future.  

A streamgage contains equipment that measures, stores and transmits data on water levels and streamflows. Most USGS streamgages transmit data via satellite to USGS computers on an hourly basis, or more frequently during emergency situations. The data are then made available online in near real-time through the USGS National Water Dashboard. Customizable updates about water conditions can also be received on the go by subscribing to USGS WaterAlert. 

USGS streamgage information can be used to meet diverse needs, including uses for water supply and management, monitoring floods and droughts, bridge and road design, determination of flood risk and many recreational activities. 

 

### Get Our News

These items are in the RSS feed format (Really Simple Syndication) based on categories such as topics, locations, and more. You can install and RSS reader browser extension, software, or use a third-party service to receive immediate news updates depending on the feed that you have added. If you click the feed links below, they may look strange because they are simply XML code. An RSS reader can easily read this code and push out a notification to you when something new is posted to our site.

RSS Icon**

California Water Science Center News

RSS Icon**

Water News
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 17 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 17 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 26, 2018

NO. 03-17-00296-CR

Robert Isreal, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED IN PART ON MOTION FOR REHEARING; VACATED IN PART ON 

MOTION FOR REHEARING -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. The Court’s 

opinion and judgment dated August 8, 2018 are withdrawn. Having reviewed the record and the 

parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial court’s judgments 

of conviction as to Counts 2 and 3. Therefore, the Court vacates the trial court’s judgments of 

conviction for second degree aggravated family violence assault in Counts 2 and 3 and affirms 

the trial court’s judgment of conviction for first degree aggravated family violence assault in 

Count 1. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert B. Watt, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belli, J.), rendered June 10, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

At about 2:00 a.m. on July 30, 1984, the body of the defendant’s estranged wife was found in the living room of her home. She had been bludgeoned with a fireplace poker, stabbed about 20 times with a carpenter’s awl, and strangled.

At about 5:15 a.m. police detectives met the defendant at his place of employment. After being told that his wife’s body had been discovered, he voluntarily accompanied the detectives to the police station. During the time he remained at the station house he said he wanted to cooperate fully with the police and denied any involvement in the crime. At one point, however, after being informed by a detective that his paramour was being interviewed, he stated: "[Sjhe’s the only one who can hurt me”. When asked to explain, the defendant said that: *709"[I]f she says that I wasn’t in bed at the time I was, then I have problems”. The detective asked what Ms. Cannella would say, and the defendant replied "[HJopefully that I was in bed with her”. The defendant subsequently left the police station, and remained free until November 7, 1985, when he was arrested on a Grand Jury indictment for his wife’s murder.

The defendant moved to suppress the statement he made about his paramour on the ground that it was the product of a custodial interrogation *(see,*CPL 60.45). The hearing court properly denied suppression. At the time the statement was made the police were investigating the murder of the defendant’s wife. The police detectives who saw the defendant at the police station testified that he did not ask to use the telephone or to speak to a lawyer, that he was not told that he was under arrest, and that he was not handcuffed. It is apparent from these facts that a reasonable person innocent of any crime, in the defendant’s position, would not have considered himself to be in custody *(People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, 589; *see also, People v Hicks,*68 NY2d 234, 240). The hearing court’s findings, which do not credit the defendant’s testimony, should not be disturbed since they are supported by the record and not "clearly erroneous” *(People v Woods,*141 AD2d 588, 589; *People v Davis,*129 AD2d 648).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0155 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0155

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Albania on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Albania in Community programmes (5532/2005 - COM(2004)0809 - C6-0039/2005 - 2004/0276(AVC)) **

*
Official Journal 092 E , 20/04/2006 P. 0057 - 0057 *

P6_TA(2005)0155

EC-Albania Framework Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Albania on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Albania in Community programmes (5532/2005 — COM(2004)0809 — C6-0039/2005 — 2004/0276(AVC))

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0809) [1],

- having regard to the text of the Council (5532/2005),

- having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Articles 13 and 308 of the EC Treaty (C6-0039/2005),

- having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6-0122/2005),

1. Gives its assent to the conclusion of the Framework Agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Republic of Albania.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OFCO LU M BIA
F ARHI SAEED BI N MOHAMM ED, : e t al . , : : P etitioner , :

: v. : Ci vi l A cti on No. 05 -13 47 (GK) : BARACK

H. OBAMA, e t al

. , :

: Re spo nde nt s. :

OR DE R For the reasons stated i n the C ourt’s Februa ry 25, 2009, Orde r i n Al-Ada hi v. Obama, Civ. No. 05-280 [Dkt. No. 291], i t is hereby OR DE RE D , that by

no later tha

n 5:00 p.m ., Marc h 13, 2009 , Re sp on de nts sh a ll s ub mit a Response conta i n i n g t h e requested re finement of the ir position as to the appropriate def inition of

“ e ne my c omb atant. ” Re sp on de nts are a lso re qu ir e d to ind ic ate wh at, i f a ny , r e sp on se the y

have to fo otn ote on e of

the ve ry re c e nt C ourt

of Ap pe a ls d e c isi on

in Ki ye mba

v. Ob ama , N o. 08 -5 42 4, sli p op. at 3 n.1 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 18, 2009).

F e br ua ry 25 , 2 00 9 /s/ Glady s Kessler Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ctJ u d ge Copies via ECF t o all couns el of recor d
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7