alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Baylake Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Jennerjohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Steven D. Jennerjohn  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Baylake Corp. and will be retained by Baylake Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-1515-001]

Take notice that on April 9, 2001, Duke Energy Audrain, LLC (Duke Audrain) filed a revision to its proposed FERC Electric Tariff Original Volume No. 1 (Tariff), clarifying that all market information shared between Duke Audrain and any public utility with a franchised service territory that is an affiliate of Duke Audrain will be disclosed simultaneously to the public and correcting tariff designations. No other changes were made to the Tariff or to Duke Audrain's Application for Order Accepting Market Based Rates for Filing and Certain Waivers and Pre-Approvals, filed in Docket No. ER01-1208-000 on March 13, 2001.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 7, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www/​ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11055 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4926

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LON T. MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CR-04-116) Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 25, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew P. Geary, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Elizabeth C. Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lon T. Martin appeals his convictions for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (2000), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime in viola tion of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000). Martin asserts the district court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence obtained during his detention by police prior to their execution of a search warrant at his residence. Finding no error, we affirm. We review the district court’s factual findings on a suppression motion for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Grossman , 400 F.3d 212, 216 (4th Cir. 2005). When a suppression motion has been denied, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government. United States v. Perkins , 363 F.3d 317, 320 (4th Cir. 2004), cert. denied , 125 S. Ct. 867 (2005). Martin first contends the district court erred in ruling that officers had the required level of reasonable and particularized suspicion to warrant his stop and detention. However, we find the district court properly determined his detention was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. See Michigan v. Summers , 452 U.S. 692 (1981). Martin next contends the evidence underlying the affidavit in support of the search warrant was illegally seized, because he had a reasonable expectation of- 3 - privacy in the trash located in cans situated on his property away from the curb, and the trash collector had become a police agent. Although Martin does not address the district court’s ruling that even assuming the trash were illegally seized, a preponderance of the evidence showed it would have been inevitably discovered through lawful means, we conclude the district court did not err in this ruling. SeeNix v. Williams , 467 U.S. 431 (1984). Finally, we find that the district court properly rejected Martin’s staleness argument based on the four-day delay between issuance and execution of the search warrant under the circumstances of this case. SeeUnited States v. Farmer , 370 F.3d 435 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 125 S. Ct. 676 (2004). Accordingly, the district court did not err when it denied Martin’s motions to suppress. We therefore affirm Martin’s convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE--EXHIBIT 27--THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL 
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ON PAGES 24-26 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR 
THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         104,606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,712,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,245
<INVENTORY>                                    338,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,376,678
<PP&E>                                      11,063,893
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,863,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,433,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,401,299
<BONDS>                                      1,185,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,401,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,433,106
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,254,841
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,418,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             110,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                735,213
<INCOME-TAX>                                   314,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   420,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the annual report of Intelligent Communication Enterprise
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Luther L. Jao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











/s/
Luther L. Jao


Luther L.
Jao


Chief
Executive Officer


April 15,
2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 35 Filed 01/15/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 35 Filed 01/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 16 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 16 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 18-2062 SCOTT JORDAN, JR., Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. TOWN OF WALDOBORO; WILLIAM LABOMBARDE, Waldoboro Chief of Police; LAWRENCE W. HESSELTINE, JR., Waldoboro Police Officer; JEFFERY FULLER, Waldoboro Police Officer; ANDREW SANTHESON, Waldoboro Police Officer, Defendants, Appellees, WALDOBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court issued on November 27, 2019, is amended as follows: On page 19, line 21, "Senior property" is replaced with "Senior's property"
Case 1:07-cv-04421-AKH Document 2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04421-AKH Document 2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
Clear All

        07 August 2023    

                    SECNAV Names Future Navajo-Class Towing, Salvage, and Rescue Ship Solomon Atkinson                 
                WASHINGTON -- Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Carlos Del Toro announced today that a future Navajo-class Towing, Salvage, and Rescue (T-ATS) ship will be named in honor of Solomon Atkinson, a pioneering Navy SEAL and an Alaskan Native of the Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Islands Reserve.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Clear All

        14 June 2022    

                    Supplanting to Take Effect at Navy Child Development Centers, School Age Care                 
                WASHINGTON - In an effort to prioritize childcare access for families with higher needs, the Navy Child and Youth Programs will reinstate supplanting at Child Development Centers and School-Age Care beginning in June.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ William KeiperDated: May 10, 2007
    
    William KeiperChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Thomas LiguoriDated: May 10, 2007
    
    Thomas LiguoriSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2566-010; Project No. 11616-000]


Consumers Energy Company, City of Portland, MI; Notice of Section 
10(j) Teleconference

January 9, 2001.
    a. Date and Time of Meeting: January 31, 2001, 10 am EST.
    b. FERC Contact: Tom Dean at (202) 219-2778; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2155494e4c40520f4544404f61474453420f4744450f5452"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d594542404c5e0349484c436d4b485f4e034b484903585e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    c. Purpose of the Teleconference: The Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, and the U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service intend to discuss the resource agency's 
recommendations that were not recommended for adoption in the Portland 
Municipal Hydroelectric Project No. 11616-000 and the Webber 
Hydroelectric Project No. 2566-010 draft environmental assessment 
issued on September 19, 2000.
    d. Proposed Agenda:

A. Introduction
    Recognition of Participants
    Teleconference Procedures and Objectives
B. Section 10(j) issues discussion
C. Issues outside of Section 10(j)
D. Summary of meeting
E. Follow-up actions

    e. Anyone wishing to participate in the teleconference should call 
toll free, 1-888-399-8606. The caller will need to give the operator 
the passcode ``Dean'', and the team leader name ``Thomas Dean'', to 
join the teleconference.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1140 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William Keiper, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hypercom Corporation.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2007 By:  /s/ William Keiper    William Keiper    Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 29-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 29-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Exhibit 32.2]

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Med
Gen, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Jack Chien, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

    (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2005

                                       /s/ JACK CHIEN
                                       -----------------------
                                       Jack Chien
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 11.1 
                                                                  ------------ 
                            TRIANGLE PACIFIC CORP. 
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE 
 
                                              Fiscal Years Ended 
                                        -------------------------------------- 
                                        January 2,   January 3,   December 29, 
                                          1998         1997           1995 
                                        -------------------------------------- 
BASIC 
----- 
 
Net Income                              $31,759,000  $25,624,000  $22,005,000 
                                         ==========   ==========   ========== 
Shares outstanding 
   beginning of period                   14,686,558   14,663,365   14,662,609 
 
Weighted average number 
   of shares issued from 
   incentive bonus shares                    23,398        1,008            - 
 
Weighted average number 
   of shares issued from 
   exercise of stock options                  5,735        5,248          567 
                                         ----------   ----------   ---------- 
 
Basic weighted common 
   shares outstanding                    14,715,691   14,669,621   14,663,176 
                                         ==========   ==========   ========== 
 
Basic net income per share              $      2.16  $      1.71  $      1.49 
                                         ==========   ==========   ========== 
 
DILUTED 
------- 
 
Weighted average number 
   of shares outstanding                 14,715,691   14,669,621   14,663,176 
 
Shares issuable from assumed 
   exercise of stock options 
   and stock warrants reduced 
   by the number of shares which 
   could have been purchased with 
   the proceeds from exercise of 
   such options and warrants                605,075      334,904      151,884 
                                         ----------   ----------   ---------- 
 
Diluted weighted common 
   shares outstanding                    15,320,766   15,004,525   14,815,060 
                                         ==========   ==========   ========== 
 
Diluted net income per share            $      2.07  $      1.71  $      1.49 
                                         ==========   ==========   ==========