alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued December 7, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00326-CV

———————————

IN RE MOHAMED LAHAM, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Mohamed Laham, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus,

challenging the trial court’s May 2, 2023 order denying relator’s “Motion 

Requesting Administrative Closure of Case for Lack of Jurisdiction.” In his 

mandamus petition, relator argued that the trial court abused its discretion by 

denying his request for administrative closure of the underlying cause because on 

January 28, 2023, the trial court entered an “Order of Partial Dismissal.” Relator 

further argued that this amounted to a final, appealable order because, although the 
2

order stated that it was a “partial dismissal” and it only dismissed the claims of a 

single defendant, the trial court’s order also included “finality language.” In his

mandamus petition, relator requested that the Court grant his petition for writ of 

mandamus and direct the trial court “to take no further action in [the underlying 

cause] as it pertains to [r]elator other than directing the Harris County District Clerk 

to close the case administratively.”1

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra.

1 The underlying case is Lydia Diaz v. Manel Chamsine, Luis A. Curbelo-Diaz, and 

Mohamed Laham, Cause No. 2022-40002, in the 270th District Court of Harris 

County, Texas, the Honorable Dedra Davis presiding.
Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 18 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 18 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        12 January 2024    

#                     SECNAV Del Toro Honors 2nd Fleet/Joint Forces Command Norfolk Commander During Ceremony                 

                Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro delivered remarks at the U.S. Second Fleet and Joint Forces Command (JCF) Norfolk change of command and change of directorship, Jan 12.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# EUR-Lex - 52004XC0416(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004XC0416(01)

**List of names of geographical units smaller than the Member State as referred to in Article 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (table wines) (Published pursuant to article 28(a) of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002) **

*
Official Journal C 092 , 16/04/2004 P. 0012 - 0028 *

List of names of geographical units smaller than the Member State as referred to in Article 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (table wines)

(Published pursuant to article 28(a) of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002)

(2004/C 92/03)

(This list updates the list published in Official Journal of the European Communities C 46 of 19 February 1999, page 154)

>TABLE>

Note:

The letter which accompanies certain names indicates their equivalence.
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 35 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 35 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

_________________x 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER
 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH)
 

_________________x 

WLADYSLAW IWANCZYK (AND WIFE, 

JADWIGA IWANCZYK) 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

v.	 PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 05362 

__________________x 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Properties OLP Co. 

LLC f/k/a BFP One Liberty Plaza Co. LLC, Brookfield Financial Properties, Inc., 

Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower B Co. L.P., WFP Tower B Co. GP 

Corp., WFP Tower D Co. L.P. and WFP Tower D Co. GP Corp. (collectively the 

"Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in 

the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' Answer to Master 

Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH Document 42 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

February ~2008

Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee, LLP 

1& 

Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH Document 42 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.1

**AMENDMENT NO. 2TOAMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

            This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment’) dated as of December  1, 2005, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), andCharles N. Martin, Jr. (the “Executive”).

            **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Amended and Restated Employment  Agreement,  dated as of September 23, 2004, as amended as of December 1, 2004(collectively, the “EA”), to secure the services of the Executive as its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board; and

            **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $1,050,291, effective as of January 1, 2006.

            **NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:

            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided inthe EA.

            2.**        **Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby  deleted and replaced withthe following new Section 6(a):

                        “(a).  *Base Salary.*  The Executive’s base salary hereunder, from September 23, 2004 to December31, 2004, shall be $990,000 per year, and from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 shall be $1,019,700 per year, in each case payable semi-monthly. Effective January 1, 2006, the Executive’s base salary hereunder shall be $1,050,291 per year, payablesemi-monthly. The Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustments from time to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”

            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive.

**-****2 -**

**            IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by  its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year firstset forth above.

                                                                       **Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**

                                                                       By:  /s/ Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                                                  Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                   Executive Vice President

                                                                       **Executive**:

**                                                                       **/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                                                                                                        Charles N. Martin, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7479
PHILLIP WITHERSPOON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EARL BESHEARS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1103-JFM) Submitted: September 24, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Witherspoon v. Beshears , No. CA-95-1103-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 30, 1995). We further deny Appellant's request for appointed counsel. We grant Appellant's request for leave to supplement the record on appeal.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-176216) and Amendment No. 382 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2019,
      with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in
      a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    /s/Ernst & Young, LLP

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 20, 2019
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1358 

HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

TRANQUIL PROSPECTS, LTD., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

 William L. Mentlik, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP, of 

Westfield, New Jersey, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Paul H. 

Kochanski, Roy H. Wepner, and Samantha M. Kameros. 

 George C. Summerfield, Stedheim & Grear, Ltd, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for 

defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Joseph A. Grear, Rolf O. Stedheim, 

Keith A. Vogt, and Steven R. Pedersen. 

 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana 

Judge Allen Sharp 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1358 

HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

TRANQUIL PROSPECTS, LTD., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

Indiana 

In CASE NO(S). 02-CV-0321. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (RADER, PROST and MOORE, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _January 10, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
TAURUS
                        ENTERTAINMENT COMPANIES, INC.
            INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

                                                                ----------------
                                                                Is the owner of 

THIS  IS  TO  CERTIFY  THAT

FULLY  PAID  AND  NON-ASSESSABLE  SHARES,  NO  PAR VALUE, OF THE COMMON STOCK OF
TAURUS PETROLEUM, INC. (HEREINAFTER CALLED THE CORPORATION), TRANSFERABLE ON THE
BOOKS  OF  THE  CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED
ATTORNEY  UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED. THIS CERTIFICATE
AND  THE  SHARES  REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE ISSUED AND SHALL BE HELD SUBJECT TO ALL
THE  PROVISIONS OF THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF THE CORPORATION,
AS  AMENDED,  TO  ALL  OF  WHICH THE HOLDER, BY ACCEPTANCE HEREOF, ASSENTS. THIS
CERTIFICATE  IS  NOT  VALID  UNTIL  COUNTERSIGNED  BY  THE  TRANSFER  AGENT.

WITNESS  THE  FACSIMILE  SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE FACSIMILE SIGNATURES OF
ITS  DULY  AUTHORIZED  OFFICERS.

                                                                Dated
                                                                     -----------

                                                          Taurus Petroleum, Inc.

      -----------------          [Corporate SEAL]          -----------------
          Secretary                                            President
<PAGE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2009272EN.01002001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/20 |

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 272/09

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Greece |
| Concerned route | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Astypalea | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Ikaria | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Leros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Milos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Chios | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Samos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Limnos–Mitilin–Chios–Samos–Rhodes | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Karpathos–Kasos–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Alexandroupolis–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Aktio–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Kithira | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Naxos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Paros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Karpathos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Skiathos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Corfu | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Kos–Leros–Astypalea | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Corfu–Aktion–Kefalinia–Zakinthos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Kalymnos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Kalamata | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Skyros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Skyros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Kastelorizo | |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1st April 2010 to the 31st March 2012 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 61 days after the day of publication of the present notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | | | | --- | | Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority | | Directorate General for Air Transport | | Air Transport and International Affairs Division — Section II | | Vas. Georgiou 1 | | 16604 Elliniko | | GREECE | | Tel. +30 2108916149 or 8916121 | | Fax +30 2108947132 | | Website: http://www.hcaa.gr | |

---
# C_2009115EN.01001901.xml

| 20.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/19

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2009/C 115/06

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glyphosate | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 1) extended to imports consigned from the Malaysia and Taiwan. Council Regulation (EC) No 163/2002 (OJ L 30, 31.1.2002, p. 1) | 1.10.2009 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Glyphosate

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 1) extended to imports consigned from the Malaysia and Taiwan. Council Regulation (EC) No 163/2002 (OJ L 30, 31.1.2002, p. 1)

1.10.2009

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.

1

(2)  Fax: +32 22956505.

2

---
# C_2010354EN.01007201.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/72

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union’

COM(2009) 510 final — 2009/0138 (CNS) (1)

1

2010/C 354/17

The Council and the European Parliament decided on 19 February 2010 and 18 February 2010, respectively, to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex Article 37 of the Treaty establishing the European Community), on the

‘Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union’

Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union

COM(2009) 510 final — 2009/0138 (CNS) (1).

1

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion(s) CESE 771/2008 and CESE 255/2010, adopted on 22 April 2008 (2) and 17 February 2010 (3), it decided, at its 461st plenary session of 17 and 18 March 2010 (meeting of 17 March), unanimously, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.

2

3

st

Brussels, 17 March 2010.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---

(1)  (The acronym should read COD.

1

(2)  EESC Opinion on Strategy for the outermost regions: achievements and future prospects - OJ C 211, 19.8.2008, p. 72.

2

EESC Opinion on Strategy for the outermost regions: achievements and future prospects

(3)  EESC Opinion on
  The impact of the Economic Partnership Agreements on the outermost regions (Caribbean region) – OJ C ...,..., p. ....

3

EESC Opinion on

The impact of the Economic Partnership Agreements on the outermost regions (Caribbean region)

---
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 85

    To provide permanent relief from the marriage penalty under the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

 Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide permanent relief from the marriage penalty under the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marriage Tax Penalty Permanent 
Elimination Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET ON MARRIAGE PENALTY RELIEF.

    Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 
of 2001 (relating to sunset of provisions of such Act) shall not apply 
to sections 301, 302, and 303 of such Act (relating to marriage penalty 
relief).
                                 <all>
```