alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Floyd E. Allen
General Counsel
The Detroit Medical Center
Corporate Administrative Offices
3990 John R  1 Brush South
Detroit, MI 48201
(313) 966-2080
(313) 966-2040 FAX  
 RE:
    
    Extension of Time under Paragraph 5.2(b), Purchase and Sale
Agreement Dated June 10, 2010 (Agreement) by and among The Detroit Medical
Center and its subsidiary organizations (Seller), VHS of Michigan, Inc. and
its subsidiary organizations (Buyer) and Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.
     
 
  By:
    
    /s/ Keith B. PittsKeith B. PittsIts:
    
    Vice Chairman
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief
Executive Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                            /s/ David G. Derrick
                                           ---------------------
                                           David G. Derrick
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           RemoteMDx, Inc.

                                           /s/ Michael G. Acton
                                           --------------------
                                           Michael G. Acton
                                           Chief Financial Officer



Dated: May 15, 2006
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 7**  **134**

RENAULT WATKINS ,

P etitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. William D. Quarles, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1 :1 3

- cv
- 0 3838

- WDQ )

Submitted : December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Renault Watkins , Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Lee Andrew Flagg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Renault Watkins appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for the return of property pursuant to Fed.
R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Watkins v. United States , No. 1:13

- cv
03838

- WDQ (D. Md. July 21, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of PASSUR Aerospace,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James T. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           By:   /s/ James T. Barry
                                                 --------------------
                                                 James T. Barry
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 February 1, 2013
Exhibit 10.35


 


AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE
EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of May 13, 2019, by and among Chongqing Jinghuangtai
Enterprise Management and Consulting Co., Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)
(“Pledgee”); Chongqing Penglin Food Co., Ltd., a limited liability company organized under the laws of the PRC
(“Penglin”) and Yan Liao, a shareholder holding 0.8% of the equity interests of Penglin (“Pledgor”,
with Pledgee and Penglin collectively referred to as the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS, in connection
with a certain Technical Consultation and Service Agreement dated as of October 9, 2017, and, Amendment to Technical Consultation
and Service Agreement dated as of February 25, 2018 (collectively, the “Consulting Agreement”), Pledgee entered
into an Equity Pledge Agreement dated as of February 25, 2018 (the “Equity Pledge Agreement”) with Penglin and
Pledgee;


 


WHEREAS, Pledgor and
Zeshu Dai, as of the date hereof, have entered into a certain Share Transfer Agreement (the “Share Transfer Agreement”),
pursuant to which Pledgor has transferred all equity interest of Penglin to Zeshu Dai and no longer been the shareholder of Penglin;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration,
the Parties agree as follows:


 


A.       TERMINATION
OF THE EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT.


 


 (1)       Pledgee hereby terminates the Equity Pledge Agreement, and Pledgor and Pledgee hereby accept such termination.




 


(2)       Each
of the Pledgee, Pledgor and Penglin acknowledges that all service fees under Consulting Agreement have been settled, if any and
the Pledgor will not undertake any further obligations under the Consulting Agreement.


 


B.       GOVERNING
LAW. This Agreement shall be governed and construed under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, and shall be binding
on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.


 


C.       COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one instrument.


 


[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]


 






     


     


    

 





SIGNATURE PAGE


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their legal representatives and duly
authorized representatives on their behalf as of the date first set forth above.


 


Pledgee:


 


Chongqing Jinghuangtai Enterprise Management and Consulting
Co., Ltd.


 


 


	By:
    	/s/ Zeshu Dai	 
	Name:
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Title:
    Legal Representative	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Chongqing
    Penglin Food Co., Ltd.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	 /s/ Zeshu Dai	 
	Name:
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Title:
    Legal Representative	 
	 	 
	Pledgor:	 
	 	 
	Yan
    Liao	 
	 	 
	By:
    	/s/ Yan Liao	 
	Yan
    Liao
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 3258

_____________________________ A

VA E LECTRIS C ANNIE a ka Eva Electris Cannie a ka Eva Helene Cannie
,
Petitioner
,

v.

W ILMINGTON S AVINGS F UND S OCIETY FSB DBA et al

. , Respondent s

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 30, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

.
R OWE , C.J., and L EWIS and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ava Electris Cannie, pro se
, Petitioner

. David Rosenberg and Jarrett Cooper of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Respondent Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

.
**Exhibit 10.4****NOTE**   Date: April 29, 2008   Maker: **Claimsnet.com, Inc.**   Payee: **Thomas Michel**   Place for Payment: 14860 Montfort Dr., Suite 250, Dallas, TX 75254   Principal Amount: Twenty-five Thousand U.S. dollars (USD$25,000.00)Annual Interest Rate on Unpaid Principal from Date of Funding: Seven percent (5%)Terms of Payment: Principal and interest shall be due and payable on demand, with thirty daysnotice, interest being calculated on the unpaid principal balance to the date of each installmentpaid, and the payment made credited first to the discharge of interest accrued and the balance tothe reduction of the principal. Accrued and unpaid interest shall be computed on the basis of theactual days elapsed in a year consisting of 365 days on the principal.Annual Interest Rate on Demanded, Unpaid Amounts: The highest rate allowed by law.Security for Payment: None     Maker promises to pay to the order of Payee at the place for payment and according to theterms of payment the principal amount plus interest at the rates stated above. All unpaid amountsshall be due upon demand.     On default in the payment of this note or in the performance of any obligation in anyinstrument securing or collateral to it, this note and all obligations in all instruments securingor collateral to it shall become immediately due at the election of Payee. Maker and each surety,endorser, and guarantor waive all demands for payment, presentations for payment, notices ofintention to accelerate maturity, notices of acceleration of maturity, protest, and notices ofprotest.     If this note or any instrument securing or collateral to it is given to an attorney forcollection or enforcement, or if suit is brought for collection or enforcement, or if it iscollected or enforced through probate, bankruptcy, or other judicial proceeding, then Maker shallpay Payee reasonable attorney’s fees in addition to other amounts due. Reasonable attorney’s fees
PAGE 1

 
shall be 10.0% of all amounts due unless either party pleads otherwise.     Nothing in this note shall authorize the collection of interest in excess of the highest rateallowed by law.     Maker reserves the right to prepay the outstanding principal balance of this Note, in whole orin part, at any time and from time to time, without premium or penalty. Any such pre-payment shallbe made together with payment of interest accrued on the amount of principal being prepaid throughthe date of such prepayment, and shall be applied to the installments of principal due hereunder inthe inverse order of maturity.     Each Maker is responsible for the entire amount of this note.     The terms Maker and Payee and other nouns and pronouns include the plural if more than one.     Maker shall not be deemed to be in default of this note unless and until Maker shall have beengiven seven (7) days written notice and opportunity to cure such default, via certified mail returnreceipt requested.      **Claimsnet.com, Inc.**
Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 9 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009115EN.01001801.xml

| 20.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/18

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2009/C 115/05

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 2268/2004 (OJ L 395, 31.12.2004, p. 56) | 1.1.2010 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 2268/2004 (OJ L 395, 31.12.2004, p. 56)

1.1.2010

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.

1

(2)  Fax: +32 2 2956505.

2

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00688-CR

Chloe Huehlefeld

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17FC-4467B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 25, 2019
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 1 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 2 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 3 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 4 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 5 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 6 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 7 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 8 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 9 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 10 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 11 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 12 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 13 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 14 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 15 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 16 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 17 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 18 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 19 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 20 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 21 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 22 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 23 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 24 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 25 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 26 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 27 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 28 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 29 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 30 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 31 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 32 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 33 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 34 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 35 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 36 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 37 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 38 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 39 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 40 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 41 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 42 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 43 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 11 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 44 of 44
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES §

GROUP, LLC, §

§ No. 48 8 , 2019

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant § Court Below: Chancery Court

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. 2019

- 0350 JTL

CAIMAN ENERGY II

, LCC; §

ENCAP FLATROCK MIDSTREAM §

FUND II, L.P.; ENCAP ENERGY §

INFRASTRUCTURE FUND, L.P.; §

TT

- EEIF CO

- INVESTMENTS, LLC; §

UT EEIF SIDE CAR, LLC; LIC

- EEIF §

SIDE CAR, LLC; OAKTREE §

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.; §

HIGHSTAR IV CAIMAN II §

HOLDINGS, LLC; FR BR §

HOLDINGS LLC; JACK M. §

LAFIELD; RICHARD D. §

MONCRIEF; STEPHEN L. ARATA; §

WILLIAM R. LEMMONS, JR., §

DENNIS F. JAGGI; STEVEN §

GUDOVIC; AND BLUE RACER §

MIDSTREAM LLC, §

§

Defendants Below, §

Appellee s

. §

Submitted: July 22 , 2020

Decided: August 3 , 2020

Before SEITZ

, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and MONTGOMERY

- REEVES

Justices.2 ORDER

This 3rd day of A ugust, 2020, after careful consideration of the parties ’

arguments, briefs and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment

of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated

in its September 25 , 2019 Memorandum Opinion

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery is AFFIRMED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G ary F

. T raynor

Justice
Clear All

        12 March 2024    

                    400+ Allied, Joint Special Operations Forces Secure the Arctic                 
                Recognizing the importance of the Arctic region to defense of the homeland from potential adversarial threats, elite special operations forces from the U.S. Navy, U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, Canada, Denmark, Norway, and the United Kingdom recently concluded high-impact training events throughout the            

        13 December 2023    

                    Naval Special Warfare Enhances Allied Defense with Romanian Special Operations Forces                 
                East-Coast based Naval Special Warfare Operators (SEALs) and the 164th Romanian Naval Special Operations Forces (ROUSOF) conducted training on maritime interdiction operations, special reconnaissance, and special operations tactics to enhance allied defense throughout the European region. The joint            

        20 July 2023    

                    Navy SEALs Enhance Maritime Domain Dominance with Partner Forces in Colombia                 
                East-Coast-Based Naval Special Warfare Operators (SEAL) showcased their capabilities and strengthened international partnerships during their participation in the multinational exercise UNITAS 64. As part of the exercise, SEALs trained alongside partner nation special operations forces in submarine            

        02 May 2023    

                    Rare Retirement Ceremony Hosted at Naval Special Warfare Group Four                 
                 Naval Special Warfare Group Four (NSWG-4) hosted a rare dual retirement ceremony on March 16.            

        01 September 2022    

                    USS Hershel “Woody” Williams Gold Crew awarded USCG Special Ops ribbon                 
                PORTSMOUTH, Va. – It was an April Fool’s Day for the ages and perhaps the signature moment for the USS Hershel “Woody” Williams (ESB 4) Gold Crew recently being awarded the United States Coast Guard Special Operations Service (SOS) Ribbon during a presentation last week by Coast Guard Vice Adm.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001045548
<NAME> TE PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,867
<PP&E>                                         869,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,619
<BONDS>                                        389,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     218,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   743,838
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,176
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,572
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,572
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Clear All

        17 January 2019    

#                     2019 Surface Navy Association (SNA) Symposium                 

                Remarks as delivered by Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website