alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.1



            July 21, 1998



            Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Inc.
            1615 Poydras St.
            New Orleans, LA  70112


            Gentlemen,

            We  are   aware  that  Freeport-McMoRan  Sulphur   Inc.  has
            incorporated   by   reference   in  its   previously   filed
            Registration Statement  on Form S-8 (File  No.333-44449) its
            Form  10-Q  for  the quarter  ended  June  30,  1998,  which
            includes  our  report  dated  July  21,  1998  covering  the
            unaudited interim  financial information  contained therein.
            Pursuant to Regulation C of the  Securities Act of 1933 (the
            Act),  this  report   is  not  considered  a   part  of  the
            registration statement prepared or certified  by our firm or
            a  report  prepared or  certified  by  our firm  within  the
            meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


            Very truly yours,
            /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Inc. unaudited financial statements at June 30,
1998 and for the six months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          33,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,338
<PP&E>                                         843,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                 743,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,648
<SALES>                                        113,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,662
<CGS>                                          108,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    227
<INCOME-TAX>                                        79
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each officer and/or director of
Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints James R. Oyler and William M. Thomas, or any of them,
as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign in the name of or on behalf of the undersigned,
as a director and/or officer of said corporation, the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2001,
and any and all amendments to such Annual Report, and to file the same with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney
this 28th day of March, 2002.

<Table>
<Caption>
            SIGNATURE                           TITLE                                      DATE
<S>                              <C>                                            <C>

/s/  James R. Oyler              President and Chief Executive Officer          March 28, 2002
----------------------------     (Principal Executive Officer) and
James R. Oyler                   Director

/s/  William M. Thomas           Vice President, Chief Financial                March 28, 2002
----------------------------     Officer, Treasurer  and Corporate
William M. Thomas                Secretary (Principal Financial and
                                 Accounting Officer)

/s/  Gerald S. Casilli           Director                                       March 28, 2002
----------------------------
Gerald S. Casilli

/s/ Wolf-Dieter Hass             Director                                       March 28, 2002
----------------------------
Wolf-Dieter Hass

/s/  Ivan E. Sutherland          Director                                       March 28, 2002
----------------------------
Ivan E. Sutherland
</Table>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

YENNY N. GONZALEZ,

Appellant,

v.

PAUL D. WALKER,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-4013

[ May 18, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Amy L. Smith, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502013DR009228XXXXNB.

Leonel R. Plasencia and Curt Sanchez of The Law Offices of Plasencia 

& Associates, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robin Bresky and Jonathan Mann of the Law Offices of Robin Bresky, 

Boca Raton, for appellee.

HANZMAN, MICHAEL A., Associate Judge.

Appellant Yenny Gonzalez challenges the trial court’s “Final Judgment 

of Paternity, Timesharing, Child Support and other Relief,” alleging

multiple errors. We affirm with one exception. Upon our review of the

record, we conclude that the trial court’s grant of ultimate decision making 

authority to the appellee was an abuse of discretion as: (a) the pleadings 

did not place appellant on adequate notice that this relief was being 

sought, Cruz v. Domenech, 905 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); and 

(b) no competent evidence showed “a continuing pattern of hostility that 

reasonably would lead one to conclude that the parties [would] be unable 

to effectively work together for their child’s best interests.” Fazzaro v. 

Fazzaro, 110 So. 3d 49, 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). We therefore direct the 

trial court to enter an Amended Final Judgment providing that the parties 

confer and jointly make all major decisions regarding the welfare of the 

child.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.
2

DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the      
     Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Income Statement of GATC and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.     
</LEGEND>
                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000,000
                                         
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         21
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  89
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                       3814   
<DEPRECIATION>                               1559  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3062  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                      1338 <F2>  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    774 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3062  
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              763
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 336 <F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              139 <F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            118 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               107 <F5> 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            80
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   80
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
<FN>
<F1> Not applicable because GATC has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2> This value consists of two components: Long-term debt of 1,230 million and
     Capital Lease Obligations of 108 million.  Short-term debt is not included
     in this calculation.
<F3> This value represents Operating Expenses on the Condolidated Income
     Statement.
<F4> This value consists of the Provision for Depreciation and Amortization on
     the Consolidated Income Statement.
<F5> This value represents Income Before Income Taxes and Equity in Net Earnings
     of Affiliates.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-04416-AKH Document 2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04416-AKH Document 2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES v. Clinton Chat CAMPBELL, [ XXX XX XXXX ], Fireman Recruit (E-1), U. S. Navy.

NCM 78 1556.

U. S. Navy Court of Military Review.

Sentence Adjudged 12 July 1978.

Decided 19 Jan. 1979.

LT Christopher C. Henderson, JAGC, USNR, Appellate Defense Counsel.

CDR T. C. Watson, Jr., JAGC, USN, Appellate Government Counsel.

Before BAUM, Senior Judge, and MICHEL and GRANGER, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with his pleas, appellant was found guilty of one period of unauthorized absence in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886, and concomitantly breaking restriction in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. On 12 July 1978, the military judge sentenced appellant to be confined at hard labor for 4 months and to be discharged from the naval service with a bad-conduct discharge. On 17 August 1978, the special court-martial convening authority took his action and purported to approve and execute the sentence. Although this action was erroneous, *see*Article 71(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 871(c), it was timely. *See Dunlap v. Convening Authority,*23 U.S.C.M.A. 135, 48 C.M.R. 751 (1974). 17 October 1978, the supervisory authority, in his action, rectified the erroneous execution attempt by the convening authority; however, this latter action was not timely. *See United States v. Brewer,*1 M.J. 233 (C.M.A.1975).

The Government concedes that the accused was in continuous post-trial confinement from the date of trial until the date of the supervisory authority’s action, a period of 97 days. *See United States v. Manalo,*1 M.J. 452 (C.M.A.1976). There is nothing of record which indicates that the Government should be able to displace the heavy burden of proving due diligence so as to overcome the presumption of a denial of a speedy disposition of this case. *See Dunlap, supra.*No attempt to do so has even been made; the Government merely contends that the appellant has not shown in what way he has been prejudiced by the delay. This he is not required to do. *Dunlap*and *Brewer,*both *supra.*There is but one remedy for such a situation. *See Bouler v. United States,*1 M.J. 299 (C.M.A.1976).

Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside and the charges ordered dismissed.

*810BAUM, Senior Judge

(concurring):

I must concur with the majority opinion because the Court of Military Appeals has clearly laid down the law that we must follow. In so doing, however, I feel compelled to register my disagreement with the arbitrary 90-day rule for post-trial action enunciated in *Dunlap v. Convening Authority,*23 U.S.C.M.A. 135, 48 C.M.R. 751 (1974) and *United States v. Brewer,*1 M.J. 233 (C.M.A.1975). I believe it imperative that the Court of Military Appeals take another look at this unreasonable rule before we are forced to free more offenders who have been properly convicted, in error-free proceedings, simply because post-trial action has not been taken within 90 days. In my view, the time has come for acceptance by the majority on the Court of Military Appeals of the clear-headed dissent of Chief Judge Duncan in *Dunlap, supra.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.86


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                           FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
                      RETIREMENT PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS

     THIS AMENDMENT is made pursuant to the authority to amend the Federal
Express Corporation Retirement Plan For Outside Directors (the "Plan") as
provided in paragraph 8 therein.

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Federal Express Corporation at its
meeting on July 19, 1993 adopted a resolution amending the Plan; and

     WHEREAS, it is necessary to conform the terms of the Plan to such amending
resolution;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective September 1, 1993, in
the following respects:

                                      FIRST

     Paragraph 2 is amended by deleting "10 years," where it appears in the
second sentence and replacing it with the following:

         the number of years determined by reference to the following schedule:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         YEARS OF SERVICE                    DURATION OF PENSION
          AS A DIRECTOR                       PAYMENTS IN YEARS

               <S>                                 <C>
                  5-10                             10
                  11                               11
                  12                               12
                  13                               13
                  14                               14
               15 or more                          15
</TABLE>


                                     SECOND

         Subparagraph 3(a) is amended by deleting "10 years" where it appears in
  the second sentence and replacing it with the following "the number of years
  determined by reference to the first schedule in paragraph 2".

<PAGE>   2


         Subparagraph 3(a) is further amended by inserting "second" in the
  second sentence immediately following "Final Year Retainer Fee determined
  pursuant to the".

         AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS the 19th day of July, 1993.



                                     -2-
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1996
<CASH>                                         39
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,616
<INVENTORY>                                    10,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,142
<PP&E>                                         1,865,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                 994,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,080,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,963
<BONDS>                                        248,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       72,530
<OTHER-SE>                                     424,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,080,373
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,494
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                48,377
<INCOME-TAX>                                   18,260
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            30,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   30,117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

This writing will serve as a mutual agreement to terminate the Managing General
Agency Agreement ("Agency Agreement") between Generali- U.S. Branch ("Generali")
and Seibels Bruce & Company and Agency Specialty of Kentucky, Inc. (collectively
"Seibels Bruce") pursuant to Article IX, Paragraph I of the Agency Agreement
except as herein specified. Termination shall be effective on the date of
execution noted below (the "Effective Date").

It is hereby agreed that, as of the Effective Date: (1) As verbally mutually
agreed, Generali and Seibels Bruce will continue to write business pursuant to
the terms of the Agency Agreement until February 1, 1998 unless the parties
mutually agree to shorten such period- (2) Generali and Seibels Bruce will
forward a joint letter to be agreed upon by both parties to all subproducers
appointed pursuant to Article 1, Paragraph 7 of the Agency Agreement advising of
the termination of the Agency Agreement- (3) As previously verbally mutually
agreed, irrespective of the 180 day period referred to in Article LX, Paragraph
I of the Agency Agreement, both parties may engage in the commercial lines
business with other parties in the territories specified in Addendum #1 of the
1996 Agency Agreement immediately following the effective date (i.e. the parties
may compete)- (4) Generali, or any managing agents appointed by it, shall be
permitted to utilize some or all of the subproducers appointed pursuant to
Article 1, Paragraph 7 of the Agency Agreement and to write business with
customers of such subproducers immediately following the effective date-, (5)
Seibels Bruce shall be permitted to write business with other carriers or
affiliates in the territories specified in Addendum 91 of the 1996 Agency
Agreement immediately following the effective date; (6) Seibels Bruce will
handle, to conclusion, the run-off of any administrative duties and final
resolution of all open or subsequently reported claims on policies issued under
the terms of the Agency Agreement in the manner specified in the Agency
Agreement except as may be otherwise mutually agreed- (7) As of the Effective
Date, Article X of the Agency Agreement ("Confidentiality") is eliminated.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GENERALI AND SEIBELS BRUCE HAVE EXECUTED THIS MUTUAL
TERMINATION AGREEMENT.

            GENERALI - U.S. BRANCH        SEIBELS BRUCE & COMPANY

            BY:                           BY:

            DATE: Aug. 26, 1977           DATE: Aug. 27, 1997

            WITNESS:                      WITNESS:

            BY:                           BY:

<PAGE>   2

            DATE:        7/26/97          DATE: 8/27/97

Termination Agreement between Generali and Seibels Bruce (signature line
continued)

                         AGENCY SPECIALTY OF KENTUCKY, INC.

                                     BY:

                                    DATE:

                                   WITNESS

                                    BY: @/

                                    DATE:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 757 

To redesignate the Federal building and United States Courthouse located 

at 200 East Wall Street in Midland, Texas, as the ‘‘George H. W. 

Bush and George W. Bush United States Courthouse and George Mahon 

Federal Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2009 

Mr. CONAWAY (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. CARTER, Mr. OLSON, 

Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. BOUSTANY, 

Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. HARPER, Ms. GRANGER, 

Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. HALL of 

Texas, Mr. WALDEN, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, 

Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, 

Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. REYES, 

Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. 

SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. PAUL, Mr. AL GREEN of 

Texas, Mr. EDWARDS of Texas, and Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Federal building and United States 

Courthouse located at 200 East Wall Street in Midland, 

Texas, as the ‘‘George H. W. Bush and George W. 

Bush United States Courthouse and George Mahon Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 757 IH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building and United States Courthouse 

3 located at 200 East Wall Street in Midland, Texas, known 

4 as the George Mahon Federal Building, shall be known 

5 and designated as the ‘‘George H. W. Bush and George 

6 W. Bush United States Courthouse and George Mahon 

7 Federal Building’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

11 building and United States Courthouse referred to in sec12 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George 

13 H. W. Bush and George W. Bush United States Court14 house and George Mahon Federal Building’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS