alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            8087
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            3833
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      32162
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         274734
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  328312
<DEPOSITS>                                      190038
<SHORT-TERM>                                     53300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1742
<LONG-TERM>                                      11449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                       71732
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  328312
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   6035
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  479
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    41
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  6555
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2690
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3865
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1790
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1790
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1198
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.61
<LOANS-NON>                                       3672
<LOANS-PAST>                                       411
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2056
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        9
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2122
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2122
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Angelo Tullo, the CEO of YP.Net, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP.Net, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of YP.Net, Inc.

     Date: February 11, 2004          /s/ Angelo Tullo
                                      ----------------
                                      Angelo Tullo
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


     I, David Iannini, the CEO of YP.Net, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP.Net, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended December 31, 2003fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of YP.Net, Inc.

     Date: February 11, 2004          /s/ David Iannini
                                      -----------------
                                      David Iannini
                                      Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
#### Village of Port Chester, Respondent, v Westchester Avenue Marina Realty, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and Janet Passarelli, Appellant. Peter Iasillo, as Mayor of the Village of Port Chester, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

In an action pursuant to Executive Law § 382 (3), *inter alia,*to direct the removal of a building constructed without a permit, Westchester Avenue Marina Realty, Inc., and Janet Passarelli appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered May 27, 1988, which, *inter alia,*denied Janet Passarelli’s cross motion to dismiss the action as against her, (2) a judgment of the same court dated June 17, 1988, which, *inter alia,*directed that the subject building be removed, and (3) a judgment of the same court dated June 24, 1988, which dismissed the counterclaim and the third-party action.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgments dated June 17, 1988, and June 24, 1988, respectively, are affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff-respondent and the third-party defendants-respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

*565The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order and brought up for review and have been considered on appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

We have reviewed the defendants’ claims and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or meritless. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2 -- Certification required under Section 906
                of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                    PISMO COAST VILLAGE, INC.

  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Subsection 1350 of the
  ----------------------------------------------------------
                    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    -----------------------

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
"Report") of Pismo Coast Village, Inc. (The "Company") for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, the undersigned, Jay Jamison,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Subsection 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




Date: November 13, 2010      /S/ JAY JAMISON
                             Jay Jamison, Chief Executive Officer
                             (principal executive officer)


                                 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
# C_2009241EN.01001101.xml

| 8.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/11

---

Final Report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/M.4381 — JCI/VB/FIAMM

(Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision (2001/462/EC, ECSC) of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision (2001/462/EC, ECSC) of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 241/05

On 26 October 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration by which VB Autobatterie GmbH (‘VB’, Germany), an undertaking jointly controlled by Johnson Controls Inc. (USA) and Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany), acquires sole control of the automotive starter battery business of FIAMM SpA. (‘FIAMM SBB’, Italy).

Upon examination of the notification, the Commission concluded that the notified operation raised serious concerns as to its compatibility with the common market, and decided to initiate proceedings pursuant to Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on 4 December 2006.

Access to key documents was provided to the notifying party on 6 December 2006 and 12 December 2006, in accordance with paragraph 45 of DG Competition's Best Practices on the conduct of EC merger control proceedings.

The Commission sent a Statement of Objections to VB on 12 February 2007, to which VB and FIAMM each replied on 26 February 2007. The parties did not request a formal oral hearing.

VB was granted access to file upon issuance of the Statement of Objections. Further access to the results of the market investigation was granted throughout the procedure.

On 8 March 2007, the notifying party offered commitments designed to meet the competition concerns identified by the Commission in the Statement of Objections, and subsequently submitted a revised proposal for commitments on 29 March 2007.

In the light of the Commitments offered by the notifying party, the Commission has concluded that the proposed concentration does not significantly impede effective competition in the common market or a substantial part of it, in particular as a result of the creation or strengthening of a dominant position, subject to the conditions set out in the Annex to the draft Decision.

In the light of the above, I consider that the rights to be heard of all participants to the present proceeding have been respected.

Brussels, 19 April 2007.

Karen WILLIAMS

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6803** 

ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. JAMES WADE, Food Services Director; B. OSBOURNE, Food Services Worker; LT. LAFAYETTE FLEMING; WARDEN TRACY RAY; JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 7:11

- cv - 00198

- SGW

- RSB )

Submitted : September 11, 2012 Decided: October 3, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Eric Joseph DePaola, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Joseph DePaola appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants summary judgment on his First Amendment claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Lan d Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc (2006), and dismissing his Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. DePaola v. Wade , No. 7:11

- cv - 00198

- SGW

- RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision al process.
AFFIRMED
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4353

_____________________________
E LIJAH L. U NION ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assi stance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

February 27, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C).

L EWIS , W INSOR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely an d authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Elijah L. Union, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
|   | (A) | the Employee's rendering, while employed by the Employer, of any services, assistance or advice, either directly or indirectly, to any person, firm or organization competing with, or in opposition to, the Employer; |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (B) | the Employee's allowing, while employed by the Employer, any use of his name by any person, firm or organization competing with, or in opposition to, the Employer; or |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (C) | willful misconduct by the Employee, including, but not limited to, the commission by the Employee of a felony or the perpetration by the Employee of a common law fraud upon the Employer. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23313-23314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Air Carrier 
Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advice the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss air carrier operations issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 22, 2001, at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Conference Room 827, Federal 
office Building 10A (the ``FAA Building''), 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC, 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Williams, Office of Rulemaking, 
800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-
9658.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App II) notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 
on Air Carrier Operations to be held on May 22, 2001.
    The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Airplane Performance Working Group final report.
    <bullet> Extended Range Operations with Two-Engine Aircraft (ETOPS) 
Working (ETOPS) Working Group status report.

[[Page 23314]]

    <bullet> All Weather Operations Harmonization Working Group status 
report.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but may be limited by 
the space available. Members of the public must make arrangements in 
advance to present oral statements at the meeting or may present 
written statements to the committee at any time. Arrangements may be 
made by contacting the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Sign and oral interpretation can be made available at the meeting, 
as well as an assistive listening device, if requested 10 calendar days 
before the meeting.
    If you are in need of assistance or require a reasonable 
accommodation for this event, please contact the person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 2, 2001.
Gregory L. Michael,
Assistant Executive Director for Air Carrier Operations, Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 01-11718 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23894-23898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 01-08]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated July 
21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 01-08 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: May 4, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M

[[Page 23895]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10MY01.016


[[Page 23896]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10MY01.017


[[Page 23897]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10MY01.018


[[Page 23898]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10MY01.019

[FR Doc. 01-11759 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-C
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-60445

Summary Calendar

____________________

ALBERT LYNN BARCROFT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States Tax Court

(21515-95)

_________________________________________________________________

December 17, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court determining

that taxpayer Albert Lynn Barcroft was liable for income tax

deficiencies for the years 1992 and 1993 and for additions to tax

under I.R.C. §§ 6651 and 6654. Barcroft failed to file tax returns

for the years in question, and the Commissioner determined his

income tax liabilities based primarily on information returns
2

submitted by a third party. The Tax Court sustained the

deficiencies because Barcroft admitted receiving the income; he

devoted his efforts in the Tax Court principally to raising tax

protestor arguments that have been repeatedly rejected by the

courts. On appeal, Barcroft challenges the administrative

procedures and the procedures in the Tax Court. He asserts that

the Tax Court lacked jurisdiction over this case because the

substitute returns prepared by the Internal Revenue Service and the

notice of deficiency were not signed and because the IRS failed to

summon his books and records prior to issuing the notice of

deficiency. Barcroft also challenges the constitutionality of

placing the burden of proof on him and requiring him to respond to

the Commissioner’s discovery request. Barcroft’s arguments are

meritless; indeed, they are frivolous. This appeal is,

accordingly, DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

The Commissioner has filed a Motion for Imposition of

Sanctions against Barcroft for bringing a frivolous appeal. The

motion is GRANTED in part and Barcroft is assessed double costs.

Fed. R. App. P. 38.

Appeal DISMISSED; Commissioner’s motion for sanctions GRANTED

in part; all other pending motions are DENIED.
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 25 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 25 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 25 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
# C_2010354EN.01006901.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/69

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a long-term plan for the anchovy stock in the Bay of Biscay and the fisheries exploiting that stock

COM(2009) 399 final — 2009/0112 (CNS) (1)

1

2010/C 354/14

The Council and the European Parliament decided on 19 January 2010 and 5 March 2010, respectively, to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex Article 37 of the Treaty establishing the European Community), on the

Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a long-term plan for the anchovy stock in the Bay of Biscay and the fisheries exploiting that stock

Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a long-term plan for the anchovy stock in the Bay of Biscay and the fisheries exploiting that stock

COM(2009) 399 final — 2009/0112 (CNS) (1).

1

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 461st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 March 2010 (meeting of 17 March 2010), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

st

Brussels, 17 March 2010.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---

(1)  The acronym should read COD.

1

---
Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


December 16, 2019






Hamilton E. James
Chairman of the Board
Costco Wholesale Corporation




RE: Executive Employment Agreement


Dear Tony:


As provided for under section 7(b) of the Executive Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2017, between Costco Wholesale Corporation and me, this letter will confirm an extension of the term through and including December 31, 2020, of the agreement as amended. Please countersign below to indicate acceptance on behalf of the Company.


Very truly yours,




	
	
	/s/ W. CRAIG JELINEK

	W. Craig Jelinek

	President and CEO

	 

	 

	 

	Costco Wholesale Corporation

	By: /s/ HAMILTON JAMES

	Hamilton E. James

	Chairman of the Board








cc: John Stanton