alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00523-CR

IN RE Miguel MARTINEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 7, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 31, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for stay of the 

underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. After 

considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Relator’s motion for stay is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-CR-4203, styled The State of Texas v. Miguel Martinez, pending in 

the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable W.C. Kirkendall presiding.
Clear All

        02 May 2023    

                    Miami Marlins Host Fleet Week Service Members to a Memorable Evening at the Ballpark                 
                 More than 500 Sailors, Marines and Coast Guardsmen “invaded” loanDepot Park Friday, April 28 to enjoy Military Night with the Marlins.The service members were from the commands participating in Fleet Week Port Everglades from April 23-30. Not only did they get to enjoy the action on the field but            

        30 April 2023    

                    Honoring the Local Community through “Service” is at the Forefront of Fleet Week Port Everglades                 
                FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (April 29, 2023) – Community relations events presents an opportunity for Sailors to give back to the communities that support and appreciate the Armed Services of America. Each year during Fleet Week visiting Sailors and Marines are asked to participate in COMREL activities            

        24 April 2023    

                    Ships Arrive in Fort Lauderdale for Fleet Week Port Everglades                 
                FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – For the next week, Southeast Florida residents will have the opportunity to see and tour Navy and U.S. Coast Guard ships as the 32nd Fleet Week Port Everglades kicks into gear.U.S. Navy destroyer, USS Cole (DDG 67), a ship commissioned in 1996 in Fort Lauderdale, was the            

        21 April 2023    

                    USFF and CNIC to Conduct Hurricane Response Exercise                  
                WASHINGTON - Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) and Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC) will conduct their annual two-week hurricane preparedness, disaster response and recovery exercise, Hurricane Exercise/Citadel Gale (HURREX/CG-23) 2023, April 24 – May 5.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
EXHIBIT 32
        Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act





     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           OF TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC.
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an
officer of Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") and in connection with the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2010 ("Report"), that:

   *  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)  and
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
   *  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial
      statements included in the Report.






/s/ Michael R. Sand                          /s/ Dean J. Brydon
---------------------------------            --------------------------------
Michael R. Sand                              Dean J. Brydon
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer


Date: February 7, 2011

                                      51

<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Freddy Salcedo, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence, J.), rendered July 6, 1982, convicting him of conspiracy in the fourth degree, arson in the third degree (five counts), reckless endangerment in the first degree (four counts) and violation of General Business Law § 340, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant, who operated a bodega, conspired with others to eliminate competition by burning down grocery stores and supermarkets in the area. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Although the defendant testified that he was not involved in the crimes charged, the jury was entitled to reject this claim and convict him on the strength of eyewitness accounts of coconspirators and accomplices corroborated by the defendant’s own tape-recorded inculpatory statements *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including his claim that his sentence was excessive, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH     Document 8      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH     Document 8      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 2 of 2
NO. 12-16-00114-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DONNA MORRIS, 

APPELLANT

V.

MIKE HUDSON,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 241ST 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement 

was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., April 18, 2016. On 

April 18, 2016, this court requested that Appellant file a docketing statement within ten days if 

she had not already done so. On the same date, by separate letter, this court notified Appellant 

that the filing fee was due on or before April 28, 2016.

Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in the April 18, 2016 

notice, this court issued a second notice on April 29, 2016, advising Appellant that the docketing 

statement was past due. The notice also advised Appellant that the filing fee in the appeal was 

due to have been paid on or before April 28, 2016, but had not been received. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 5. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement was filed and the filing fee 

paid on or before May 9, 2016, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement and paying 

the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the court’s request. 

Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
2

Opinion delivered May 11, 2016.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 11, 2016

NO. 12-16-00114-CV

DONNA MORRIS,

Appellant

V.

MIKE HUDSON,

Appellee

Appeal from the 241st District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 06-155-C)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-26-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-21-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-26-1998   
<CASH>                                              17,300
<SECURITIES>                                             0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                       74,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,400
<INVENTORY>                                         74,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   183,300
<PP&E>                                             311,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                     131,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     407,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              115,000
<BONDS>                                            148,200<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            27,300
<OTHER-SE>                                          93,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       407,700
<SALES>                                            411,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   411,600
<CGS>                                              198,100    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      353,800<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (300)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     47,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 28,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        28,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.65
<FN>                                                               
<F1> INCLUDES: CAPITALIZED LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND LONG-TERM DEBT    
     OF $11,200 AND $137,000, RESPECTIVELY.                             
<F2> INCLUDES: COST OF GOODS SOLD AND S,G & A EXPENSES             
     OF $198,100 AND $155,700, RESPECTIVELY.                            
</FN>

        
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   








</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WENDI LEDERMAN , Appellant,

v.

LIZ GRADY, as Trustee of THE PURVIS DEAN JACKSON, JR. TRUST OF APRIL 3, 1996 , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 151

[ April 29, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Betsy Benson , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 20

- 26217 COCE
and 20

- 17848 CACE

.

Wendi Lederman, North Lauderdale, pro se.

Benjamin Dishowitz of Doumar, Allsworth, Laystrom, Voigt, Wachs,
Adair & Dishowitz , LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS , C IKLIN and F ORST
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23693-23694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. GT01-20-000]


Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

May 3, 2001.

    Take notice that on April 30, 2001, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to be 
effective June 1, 2001:

Third Revised Sheet No. 5A
Second Revised Sheet No. 5B
Second Revised Sheet No. 5C

    Trunkline states that the purpose of this filing, made in 
accordance with the provisions of Section 154.106 of the Commission's 
Regulations, is to revise the system map to reflect changes in the 
pipeline facilities and the points at which service is provided.
    Trunkline states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's

[[Page 23694]]

Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11662 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
(84 South. 924)

#### EVANS v. STATE.

(7 Div. 33.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 27, 1919.)

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals.

Hugh Reed, of Center, and O. R. Hood, of Gadsden, for appellant.

J; Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Horace Wilkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the 'State.

THOMAS, J.

Petition of Norman Evans for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court, affirming the cause of Norman Evans v. State, 82 South. 625. Writ denied.
Case 1:07-cv-05393-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05393-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05393-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05393-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 33 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 33 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 99.2**

**LASER MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, INC.**

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of LASER Mortgage Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William J. Michaelcheck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates andfor the periods indicated. |

 

| Date: May 15, 2003 | /s/ WILLIAM J. MICHAELCHECK                                                 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                                                                             |
|               | **William J. Michaelcheck  Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director** |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME,
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND THE NOTES
THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         11365
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120214
<ALLOWANCES>                                   15312
<INVENTORY>                                    68952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211601
<PP&E>                                         180275
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          82080
<BONDS>                                        3239
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       131643
<OTHER-SE>                                     101290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330382
<SALES>                                        625190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               625190
<CGS>                                          320652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  551002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               10290
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                74188
<INCOME-TAX>                                   31672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            43339
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   43339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  4.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  4.67



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6808

ROBERT COOPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HENRY J. GAITHER; B. THOMAS; LEHRMAN W. DOTSON, Warden; TYRONE CROWDER, Acting Chief of Security; MARVIN REID, Major; COTTMAN, Lieutenant; CARTER, Lieutenant; J. DAVIS, Lieutenant; D. LANE, Lieutenant; PETERS, Lieutenant; W. PITTMAN, Lieutenant; WILSON, Captain; MCFARLANE, Captain; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE; SUNNY KOMOLAFE; ZERABRUCH TEWELDE, M.D., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-cv02216-AMD) Submitted: November 14, 2007 Decided: December 7, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Robert Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. Gaither , No. 1:06-cv-02216-AMD (D. Md. May 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                       Page 86
                                     Exhibit 23.2

                           CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


The Board of Directors
TODAY'S BANCORP, INC.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Form
S-8 (File No. 33-21550) of TODAY'S BANCORP, INC. of our report dated January 22,
1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of TODAY'S BANCORP, INC. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated
statements of income, cash flows, and changes in capital, for the years then
ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of TODAY'S BANCORP, INC.


                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 19, 1996