alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 26-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 26-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 26-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 26-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 4
IB 

Union Calendar No. 269 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1620 

[Report No. 116–338] 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 

Chesapeake Bay Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mrs. LURIA (for herself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and Mr. SARBANES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

DECEMBER 12, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. RIGGLEMAN, Mr. BROWN of 

Maryland, Mr. TRONE, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. HOYER, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

CUMMINGS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. 

SPANBERGER, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. MCEACHIN, Ms. WEXTON, and Mr. 

BEYER

DECEMBER 12, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1620 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 

reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Program. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1620 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Pro5 gram Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PRO7 GRAM. 

8 Section 117(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

9 Act (33 U.S.C. 1267(j)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘$40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2005’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘$90,000,000 for fiscal year 2020, 

12 $90,500,000 for fiscal year 2021, $91,000,000 for fiscal 

13 year 2022, $91,500,000 for fiscal year 2023, and 

14 $92,000,000 for fiscal year 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 269 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1620 

[Report No. 116–338] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

to reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Program. 

DECEMBER 12, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 17, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 17, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0118. EMORY UNIVERSITY, INC. d/b/a EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al. 

v. NEUROCARE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

11A36471
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

NO. 22-0520

SHERRY BEARD AND JOSEPH 

BEARD

v.

MCGREGOR BANCSHARES, INC. 

AND THE FIRST NATIONAL 

BANK OF MCGREGOR D/B/A 

TFNB YOUR BANK FOR LIFE, 

AND DAVID LITTLEWOOD

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

September 2, 2022

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, 

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify 

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case 

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under 

the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioners, SHERRY BEARD AND JOSEPH BEARD, pay all 

costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this 

the 7th day of October, 2022.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1819 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to provide 

for rewards for the arrest or conviction of certain foreign nationals 

who have committed genocide or war crimes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2019 

Ms. FOXX of North Carolina (for herself and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to provide for rewards for the arrest or conviction 

of certain foreign nationals who have committed genocide 

or war crimes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘War Crimes Rewards 

5 Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF STATE REWARDS PROGRAM. 

7 Paragraph (10) of section 36(b) of the State Depart8 ment Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(b)) 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1819 IH

1 is amended by striking ‘‘defined under the statute of such 

2 tribunal;’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘defined under— 

3 ‘‘(A) the statute of such country or tri4 bunal, as the case may be; or 

5 ‘‘(B) United States law;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2004283EN.01000201.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/2

---

Statement by the Commission concerning Article 7(4) of Protocol 3 on ACP sugar of Annex V to the ACP-CE Partnership Agreement

(2004/C 283/02)

As a result of a Decision taken by the Commission under Article 7(3) of Protocol 3 on ACP sugar (C/2004/902), 18 215 tonnes of sugar were available for reallocation. The Commission hereby gives notice that, pursuant to the provisions of Article 7(4) of that Protocol, it has allocated, by Decision C/2004/4375, 18 215 tonnes of sugar (expressed as white sugar), with effect from 1 July 2003, to the countries listed below. This means that, with effect from the 2003/2004 delivery period, the agreed quantities specified in Article 3(1) of the said Protocol will be amended as follows (expressed in tonnes of white sugar):

| State | Agreed quantities | New agreed quantities (1.7.2003) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reallocated | Reduced |
| Barbados | — | 18 215 | 32 097,4 |
| Belize | 0 | 0 | 40 348,8 |
| Congo | 0 | 0 | 10 186,1 |
| Fiji | 0 | 0 | 165 348,3 |
| Guyana | 0 | 0 | 159 410,1 |
| Ivory Coast | 0 | 0 | 10 186,1 |
| Jamaica | 0 | 0 | 118 696,0 |
| Kenya | 5 000 | 0 | 5 000,0 |
| Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 10 760,0 |
| Malawi | 0 | 0 | 20 824,4 |
| Mauritius | 0 | 0 | 491 030,5 |
| Mozambique | 6 000 | 0 | 6 000,0 |
| Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Suriname | 0 | 0 | 117 844,5 |
| Swaziland | 0 | 0 | 10 186,1 |
| Tanzania | 0 | 0 | |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 0 | 0 | 43 751,0 |
| Uganda | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zambia | 7 215 | 0 | 7 215,0 |
| Zimbabwe | 0 | 0 | 30 224,8 |
| TOTAL | 18 215 | 18 215 | 1 294 700,0 |

State

Agreed quantities

New agreed quantities (1.7.2003)

Reallocated

Reduced

Barbados

—

18 215

32 097,4

Belize

0

0

40 348,8

Congo

0

0

10 186,1

Fiji

0

0

165 348,3

Guyana

0

0

159 410,1

Ivory Coast

0

0

10 186,1

Jamaica

0

0

118 696,0

Kenya

5 000

0

5 000,0

Madagascar

0

0

10 760,0

Malawi

0

0

20 824,4

Mauritius

0

0

491 030,5

Mozambique

6 000

0

6 000,0

Saint Kitts and Nevis

0

0

0

Suriname

0

0

117 844,5

Swaziland

0

0

10 186,1

Tanzania

0

0

Trinidad and Tobago

0

0

43 751,0

Uganda

0

0

0

Zambia

7 215

0

7 215,0

Zimbabwe

0

0

30 224,8

TOTAL

TOTAL

18 215

18 215

18 215

18 215

1 294 700,0

1 294 700,0

---
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Real Estate Associates Limited (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
#### Steven L. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, and Agents/Employees thereof, Defendant-Appellee, and Carolane Williams, President Baltimore City Community College; Kim James, Vice President Baltimore City Community College; Alvin Winkler, Chief of Public Safety; Tony Warner, Director of Human Resources Baltimore City Community College; Garland Williams, President Board of Trustees Baltimore City Community College; Bryan Berry, Attorney; Maureen David, Attorney, Defendants.

No. 12-2501.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 30, 2013.

Decided: May 2, 2013.

Steven L. Jones, Appellant pro se. Steven Marshall Sullivan, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*214Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven L. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Jones v. Baltimore City Cmty. Coll.,*No. 1:11-cv-00793-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 16, 2012; Sept. 25, 2012; Oct. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Richard S. Mills, Esq. (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson, Esq. (JPC-9391)

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE 

LITIGATION

21 MC 102 (AKH)

ZOILA PASTUIZACA,

 Plaintiff, -against- 90 CHURCH STREET LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, ET. AL., 

 Defendants.

INDEX NO.: 07-CV-05308 (AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF AMBIENT 

GROUP, INC. S ANSWER

TO MASTER COMPLAINT

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., by its attorneys, 

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, as and for its Response to the allegations set forth 

in the Amended Complaint by Adoption (Amended Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master

Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, hereby adopts its Answer to Master Complaint

dated August 2, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In Re World Trade Center Lower

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, the defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., demands judgment dismissing

the above-captioned action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such

other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 37 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: New York, New York

May 13, 2008 

Yours etc., 

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc. 

By:_ s/ John P. Cookson ____________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483.9490

TO: Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

(212) 267.3700

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

(212) 553.9206

James E. Tyrrell, Jr., Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza

Newark, New Jersey 07102

(973) 848.5600

Thomas A. Egan, Esq.

Fleming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006-1404

(212) 412.9500

Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 37 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 13

th day of May 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER BY DEFENDANT AMBIENT GROUP, INC., 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which sends notification to 

appearing parties.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP

By: s/ John P. Cookson ____________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 37 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 24 of 24
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0125 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0125

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC) (COM(2004)0320 - C6-0030/2004 - 2004/0111(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 033 E , 09/02/2006 P. 0480 - 0482 *

P6_TA(2005)0125

Marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC) (COM(2004)0320 — C6-0030/2004 — 2004/0111(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0320) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0030/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0005/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 21 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 21 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 21 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT 10.16





EXTENSION
AGREEMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


between Paul G. Van Wagenen (Executive) and


Pogo Producing Company, a Delaware corporation (Company),


dated effective February 1, 2002





WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an Executive Employment Agreement bearing an original Effective Date of
February 1, 2001; and





WHEREAS, February 1, 2002, (even date herewith) is hereby deemed to be the Renewal
Date in that Executive Employment Agreement; and





WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said Executive
Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as to terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit January 31, 2004); and





WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and desires to induce Executive to remain in its employ for that extended time period; and





WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as an employee of Company for the period specified herein from and
after the date of this Extension Agreement; and





WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to enter into this Extension
Agreement in order to formally secure for Company the benefit of the experience and abilities of Executive, and to set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and Executive; and





WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been duly authorized and approved by all requisite corporate
action on the part of the Company.




---




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreements
herein contained, and in consideration of the sum of $10 paid by Company to Executive, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive and Company do hereby agree as follows:





1.    The Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company bearing an Effective Date of February 1, 2001 and a Renewal Date which
is deemed herein to be February 1, 2002, is hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing February 1, 2003 and ending January 31, 2004, unless such employment period is hereafter further extended for an additional period by both
Executive and Company.





2.    All provisions of the Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and
Company dated as of February 1, 2001, and as it is herein amended, are continued in full force and effect without change as if the Executive Employment Agreement had been initially effective as of February 1, 2002.





POGO PRODUCING COMPANYBy:

/s/    JOHN O. MCCOY,
JR.John O. McCoy, Jr.Senior Vice President andChief Administrative Officer





ATTEST:  /s/    JOEANN KINGDONAssistant Corporate Secretary








EMPLOYEE:/s/    PAUL G. VAN
WAGENENPaul G. Van WagenenChairman, President & CEO
Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 19 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 19 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Jack B. Solerwitz, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

February 5, 1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Grace D. Moran*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this court on June 16, 1965, under the name Jack Bernard Solerwitz. By decision and order of this court dated March 16, 1989, *336the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this court.

The Special Referee found the respondent guilty, *inter alia,*of neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him resulting in the expiration of the Statute of Limitations and failing to return any part of the $10,000 fee; neglecting another legal matter entrusted to him resulting in the expiration of the Statute of Limitations and refusing to return any part of the $15,000 fee; converting to his own use and benefit escrow funds amounting to at least $134,500; and converting to his own use escrow funds amounting to more than $23,000 and failing to return any part of the $50,000 fee that was paid to him in advance by the client.

The petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee.

After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the report of the Special Referee. The respondent is guilty of the professional misconduct outlined above. The petitioner’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee is granted.

The respondent is guilty of serious professional misconduct. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the petitioner’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent Jack B. Solerwitz is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent Jack B. Solerwitz is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law *337before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.