alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of James M. Segrue, Respondent, v City of Schenectady, Appellant.

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (White, J.), entered October 3, 1988 in Schenectady County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of the Mayor of the City of Schenectady dismissing petitioner from his job with respondent.

The facts underlying this matter have been previously considered by this court when we remitted to respondent for ° the imposition of a reasonable penalty based upon the one sustained violation *(Matter of Segrue v City of Schenectady,*132 AD2d 270). In February 1988, respondent’s Mayor rendered a determination which reimposed the original punishment of dismissal. Petitioner commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul the determination. Supreme Court, taking note that this court remitted the matter for the *827imposition of a "reasonable penalty”, held that the dismissal of petitioner was too harsh a penalty and remitted the matter to respondent for the imposition of a lighter, reasonable penalty.* This appeal by respondent ensued.

While respondent properly gave petitioner notice that its chief administrative officer would review and inspect petitioner’s personnel file and give him an opportunity to present comments *(see, Matter of Bigelow v Board of Trustees,*63 NY2d 470, 474; *Ferguson v Meehan,*141 AD2d 604, 605), it was improper for respondent to impose a penalty determined in whole or in part on the basis of unestablished allegations of unauthorized absences from work contained in memoranda in petitioner’s personnel file *(see, Matter of Lee v Board of Educ.,*90 AD2d 775; *Matter of Waterhouse v Hastings,*73 AD2d 1034). Reliance upon these documents, although petitioner had notice, was improper and denied petitioner his due process rights. Accordingly, Supreme Court properly determined that the penalty imposed must be annulled *(see, Matter of Lee v Board of Educ., supra)*and the matter again remitted for imposition of a "reasonable penalty”. With regard to the penalty, we agree with Supreme Court’s assessment that, considering the facts and circumstances of petitioner’s transgression, dismissal is unwarranted and a lesser penalty should be imposed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

*

 In its decision and judgment, Supreme Court advised the parties that it was filing the decision and judgment in Schenectady County and directed "[pjetitioner to serve notice of entry upon the respondent”. Despite this direction, Supreme Court cannot alter the statutory requirement of CPLR 5513 (a) that an appeal as of right must be taken within 30 days after service upon the appellant of *a copy of the judgment or order appealed from and written notice of its entry.*Parties should be certain to comply with statutory requirements.
# C_2009296EN.01003101.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/31

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 275 of 14 November 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 275 of 14 November 2009

2009/C 296/12

In the contents on the cover and the title on page 3:

for:

read:

---
Case 7:07-cv-05783-CLB Document 6 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0165 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0165

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC (12884/1/2004 - C6-0006/2005 - 2002/0254(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 092 E , 20/04/2006 P. 0064 - 0079 *

P6_TA(2005)0165

Quality of bathing water ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC (12884/1/2004 — C6-0006/2005 — 2002/0254(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,,

- having regard to the Council common position (12884/1/2004 — C6-0006/2005),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2002)0581) [2],

- having regard to the amended proposal (COM(2004)0245) [3],

- having regard to Article 251 (2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0102/2005),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 82 E, 1.4.2004, p. 115.

[2] OJ C 45 E, 25.2.2003, p. 127.

[3] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 24
- 00251
- CR
EX PARTE GARY LAYNE SMITH
Original Proceeding
From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas Trial Court No. 39,230

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gary Layne Smith pled guilty to the felony offense of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, morphine, in an amount greater than one gram but less than four
grams. See T EX

. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE § 481.115(c). Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed Smith on community supervision for five
years. Subsequently, the State filed an application to adjudicate guilt, and after a hearing, the trial court found all but three of the allegations contained in the State’s application to
be true. The trial court found Smith guilty and sentenced him to seven years and six
months in prison. A majority of this Court modified the judgment to delete two restitution amounts and affirmed his conviction on August 31, 2021. Smith v. State , 640 S.W.3d 885 (Tex.Ex parte Smith Page 2 App.

— Waco 2021, pet. ref'd) overruled in part by Shircliff v. State , 654 S.W.3d 788 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2022, no pet.)

. The Court of Criminal Appeals refused Smith’s petition for discretionary review on April 20, 2022. We then issued our mandate on May 31, 2022.
Smith has now sent this Court , two years after his conviction became final, a
“Petition to Modify Sentence,” filed on August 13, 2024, requesting that we “terminate[] execution of [his] sentence in the Interest of Justice, and issue[] an Order to Vacate Judgment. ” Smith contends he became an “Honorary Consul” in January of 2021 and declares “Consular Immunity.” He also asserts that he has been appoint ed as an Honorary Consul by “ King Devile Pentland II ” of an undesignated country or jurisdiction
and has a lso been appointed to the International Human Rights Commission by “ Judge , Prof. Rafal Wasile , ” also of an undesignated country or jurisdiction. Smith alleges that he has immediate obligations to meet for the United States that conflict with his original sentence, thus necessitating the request to vacate the trial court’s judgment. Smith’s petition is a post

- conviction attack on an otherwise final felony judgment
of conviction. Th is Court has no jurisdiction to grant post

- conviction relief in an attack on a final felony conviction. See T EX

. C RIM

. P ROC . arts. 11.07; 11.05; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) ("[The Court of Criminal Appeals is] the only court with jurisdiction in final post

- conviction felony proceedings.")

. Accordingly, this proceeding is dismissed.

TOM GRAY Chief JusticeEx parte Smith Page 3 Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 22 , 2024 Do not publish [OT06]
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 8 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 14 of 14
## Breadcrumb

-  about 
-  Doing Business 

#           Partners and Cooperators      

## We monitor, assess, map, and conduct targeted scientific research

### so that policy makers and the public have the understanding they need to address complex environmental, natural resource, and public safety issues.

Connect with Us

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business     -  Acquisitions and Financial Assistance 
  -  Partners and Cooperators 
  -  Building Partnerships 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

Given the increasingly global nature of the world’s natural science problems, we use international partnerships to conduct a variety of science worldwide. Both foreign and domestic organizations help with our global outreach.

#### Amargosa Conservancy

#### Ameren

#### Ameren Missouri - Keokuk Energy Center

#### Ameren UE, Osage Plant

#### America's PrepareAthon!

#### American Association of Geographers (AAG)

#### American Bird Conservancy

#### American Carbon Registry

#### American Eagle Foundation

#### American Electric Power

#### American Fisheries Society (AFS)

#### American Geophysical Union (AGU)

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹ Previous 
- …
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
-                Current page            6 
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Page            9 
-                Page            10 
- …
-  Next pageNext › 
-  Last pageLast »
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

HERNAN PINEDA and SARITO PINEDA,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-05376-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 19 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 14, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 19 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
|         |                                                                                                                                                |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)  and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in the Report. |

|                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |  |  |
| /s/Michael R. Sand                               |   |  /s/Dean J. Brydon                               |   |
| Michael R. Sand                                                                                                                                                                                   |   | Dean J. Brydon  |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                           |   | Chief Financial Officer  |   |
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the 
Treasury Security Commercial Tender form.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 11, 2001, 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form and instructions should be directed to Vicki S. 
Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 
26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Treasury Security Commercial Tender Form.
    OMB Number: 1535-0112.
    Form Number: PD F 5395.
    Abstract: The information is requested to process the tenders and 
to ensure compliance with regulations.
    Current Actions: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Individuals, business or other for profit, or not-
for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,500.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 375.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: May 2, 2001.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 01-11502 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-U
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 21.1

EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|Subsidiary Name                         |  | State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or
Organization |  | Names Under Which
Each Subsidiary Does Business
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Evans & Sutherland Graphics Corporation |  | Utah                                                         |  | Evans & Sutherland Graphics Corporation        
|Evans & Sutherland Computer Limited     |  | United Kingdom                                               |  | Evans & Sutherland Computer Limited            
|Xionix Simulation, Inc.                 |  | Georgia                                                      |  | Xionix Simulation, Inc.                        
|REALimage, Inc.                         |  | Delaware                                                     |  | REALimage, Inc.                                

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MAXXIS GROUP, INC., FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,860,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,096,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,042,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,818,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,943,000
<PP&E>                                       4,824,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 348,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,170,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,138,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,609,000
<COMMON>                                       455,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (900,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,170,000
<SALES>                                      3,338,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,338,000
<CGS>                                        1,531,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,544,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,013,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (46,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (252,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (252,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (252,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.16)


</TABLE>