alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1768 

To reauthorize subtitle G of title VII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 

relating to diesel emissions reduction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself, Mr. LONG, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Mr. WITTMAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To reauthorize subtitle G of title VII of the Energy Policy 

Act of 2005, relating to diesel emissions reduction, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Diesel Emissions Re5 duction Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1768 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

2 Section 797(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

3 U.S.C. 16137(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2016’’ and in4 serting ‘‘2024’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 19 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 19 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 19 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 19 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 19 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 5 of 5
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 2 
          - [FRL-6933-1] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        EPA is rescheduling the public meeting on its advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) and potential revision of the confidential business information (CBI) regulations scheduled for January 18, 2001, as advertised in the December 21, 2000                         **Federal Register**                         (65 FR 80394).                     

# DATES:

                        This meeting has been rescheduled for Wednesday, March 7, 2001 from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in the EPA Auditorium, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC. The meeting has been rescheduled based on requests from the public to allow additional time for stakeholder participation and to avoid                               ( print page 2870)                            potential travel difficulties in the Washington, D.C. area the week of January 20, 2001.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alan Margolis, Office of Information Collection, Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Mail Code 2822, Washington, DC 20460; Phone, 202-260-9329; Fax, 202-401-4544; Email,                         *margolis.alan@epa.gov.*

Dated: January 8, 2001.

Mark Luttner, 

Director, Office of Information Collection. 

[FR Doc. 01-1178 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *581Harry Lopez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), rendered on April 8, 1986, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5THCIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60638 Summary Calendar

GODSON SHARK-DURU, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A73 693 373

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Godson Shark-Duru, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying his applications for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. Shark-Daru argues that his due process rights were violated when the IJ overstepped his role as adjudicator when he made various statements and determinations concerning his credibility and character. He also contends that the IJ’s discretionaryNo. 06-60638 -2- determination was an abuse of discretion that rose to the level of

a violation of his due process rights. He does not specifically challenge the BIA’s decision, nor does he challenge the IJ’s determination that he did not show hardship that was sufficient to merit cancellation of removal. The BIA conducted its own review of the record and did not adopt the IJ’s decision, and thus this court does not have authority to review the IJ’s decision. See Girma v. INS, 283 F.3d 664, 666 (5th Cir. 2002). Because Shark-Duru challenges only statements and determinations by the IJ that this court lacks authority to review and does not challenge any of the BIA’s determinations, he has abandoned the only issues before this court. See Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607, 612-13 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, Shark-Duru has not shown any error in the BIA’s dismissal, and his petition for review is DENIED.
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 4 of 4
## Breadcrumb

-  about 

#           Documents      

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

This is a collection of supporting documents to include instructions, training materials, technical memos, flowcharts, analytical references, and more. 

Official USGS Publications

**File icon

January 21, 1986

####   MOU between USGS and Bureau of Reclamation - Nevada Nuclear Waste

**File icon

June 21, 1985

####   MOU between USGS and EPA - ground-water quality

**File icon

April 24, 1984

####   MOU between USGS and NOAA - bathymetry EEZ

**File icon

November 10, 1982

####   MOU between USGS and FEMA - framework

**File icon

September 9, 1982

####   MOU between USGS and Bureau of Land Management - program coordination

**File icon

June 1, 1982

####   MOU between USGS and NOAA - committee for program coordination

**File icon

March 15, 1982

####   MOU between USGS and NOAA - Landsat data

**File icon

August 5, 1981

####   MOU between USGS and EPA - Interagency Coordinating Committee

**File icon

November 7, 1980

####   MOU between USGS and Bureau of Land Management - environmental policy

**File icon

August 29, 1979

####   MOU between USGS and EPA - Environmental Photographic Interpretation

**File icon

June 7, 1979

####   MOU between USGS and NOAA - cartographic information

**File icon

November 21, 1978

####   MOU between USGS and NOAA - Adak facility

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
- ...
-                Page            487 
-                Page            488 
-                Page            489 
-                Page            490 
-                Page            491 
-                Page            492 
-                Page            493 
-                Current page            494 
-                Page            495 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 12 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-01514-AKH Document 12 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,802,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  606,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (195,840)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,340,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,831,172
<PP&E>                                       9,208,558
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,670,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,543,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,045,596
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,921,379
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,004,148)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,543,991
<SALES>                                        597,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               776,727
<CGS>                                          325,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  325,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,383,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (22,395,702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-2 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-2 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-2 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 7-2 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME,
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND THE NOTES
THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,577
<SECURITIES>                                    86,847
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,430
<INVENTORY>                                     78,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               297,971
<PP&E>                                         212,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,412
<BONDS>                                            609
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       131,643
<OTHER-SE>                                     195,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   475,586
<SALES>                                        779,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               779,517
<CGS>                                          430,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  650,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,742)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,189
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,576)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,120
<INCOME-TAX>                                    57,982
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             78,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,004
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.93


</TABLE>
#### In re S. ALEX SMITH & CO.

(District Court, S. D. Florida.

May 16, 1923.)

Bankruptcy (@=346—All taxes legally due must be paid as prior claims.

Under Bankruptcy Act, § 64a (Comp. St. § 9648), providing that the court “shall order the trustee to pay all taxes legally due and owing by the bankrupt,” it may not refuse to order payment of taxes due for prior years, because the authorities might have collected the same before bankruptcy.

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of S. Alex ¿Smith & Co., bankrupt. On review of order of referee denying claim for prior payment.of taxes.

Reversed.

R. H. Rowe, of Madison, Ela., for petitioner Town of Madison.

B. E. Roberson, of Eive Oak, Fla., for objecting creditors.

•®=For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests *&*Indexes

*525CAUL, District Judge.

In this matter the town of Madison made a claim for taxes for the years 1921 and 1922 due from the bankrupt. Upon a hearing before the referee an order was made on the 28th day of April, 1923, denying the petition of the town to have the taxes due for 1921 paid by the trustee as a priority. It is this order that is brought here for review.

The decision of the question here involved must be governed by the terms of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. §§ 9585-9656). Section 64 provides for the priority of payment out of the bankruptcy estate ¿nd specifically says:

> “The court *shall*order the trustee to pay all taxes legally due and owing by the bankrupt to * * * municipality in advance of the payment of dividends to creditors.”

Are these taxes legally due? The amount and due assessment are not questioned. The payment is objected to because the tax collector might have collected same by levy and sale prior to the bankruptcy proceedings. But the fact that he did not do so in no wise discharges the obligation of the taxpayer, nor releases his estate should .he subsequently go into bankruptcy. Nor does the payment of such taxes by the trustee depend upon any question of lien. The referee seems to have been led astray in the order made by the assumption that the lien for taxes attached only to the particular personal property .upon which such tax was assessed. As-1 understand the law, the lien for taxes attaches to all the property possessed by the taxpayer, whether possessed at the time of the levy of the tax or subsequently acquired. But, be this as it may, the payment of taxes properly assessed against and owing by the bankrupt at the time of bankruptcy must be paid from ■the estate before any dividends are distributed to the creditors, as provided by the Bankruptcy Act.

The petition to review is granted, and the matter remanded to the referee, with instructions to order the trustee to pay the town of Madison the amount due for taxes for the year 1921.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay or Parcellena P. Fielding, Contact Representatives, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room 303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1168  Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
exv10w1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO TEKELEC

2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN FOR NEW EMPLOYEES




     Section 3 of the Tekelec 2004 Equity Incentive Plan for New Employees is hereby amended,
effective December 15, 2005, to read in its entirety as follows:



“3.   Shares Reserved.



     The maximum aggregate number of Shares reserved for issuance
pursuant to the Plan shall be 7,000,000 Shares or the number of
            shares of stock to which such Shares shall be adjusted as provided
in Section 11 of the Plan. Such number of Shares may be set aside
out of authorized but unissued Shares not reserved for any other
purpose, or out of issued Shares acquired for and held in the
treasury of the Company from time to time.



     Shares subject to, but not sold or issued under, any Award
terminating, expiring, forfeited or canceled for any reason prior to
the issuance of such Shares shall again become available for Awards
thereafter granted under the Plan and the same shall not be deemed
an increase in the number of Shares reserved for issuance under the
Plan.”



* * *
SCWC-29649 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

DANIEL K. KANAHELE, WARREN S. BLUM, LISA BUCHANAN,

JAMES L. CONNIFF, and CAMBRIA MOSS, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs. MAUI COUNTY COUNCIL and COUNTY OF MAUI, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees,

and HONUA # ULA PARTNERS, LLC, Respondent/Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29649; CIV. NO. 08-1-0115(3))

ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court, filed on August 8, 2013, is corrected as follows:

1. On page 5, line 13: Change “t 12:51 p.m.” to “at 12:51 p.m.” 2. On page 35, line 8: Change “out” to “outside” Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29649 30-AUG-2013 09:25 AM3. On page 56, footnote 25: Delete the period that precedes the parenthesis at the end of the footnote

4. On page 56, footnote 25: Insert a period outside the parenthesis at the end of the footnote 5. On page 56, footnote 27, line 7:

Insert a space between “§ 92-8” and “(2012)” 6. On page 63, line 2: Delete “committee” 7. On page 80, in the attorney credits: Insert an “s” after “respondent” in “Mary Blaine Johnston for respondent Maui County Council and County in Maui”

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these changes.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 30, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the “
Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
C. Benoit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   David
C. Benoit


David C.
Benoit


Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.3


    Exhibit
      10.3

    


    Executive
      Officers - Analysts International Corporation

    Base
      Compensation Levels

     

     

     

    
      	
              Executive Officer

               

               

            	
              2005
                Base Salary in effect prior to

              October
                1, 2005

            	
              Current
                Base Salary

               

               

            	
               Base
                Salary effective

              January
                2, 2006

               

            
	
              Jeffrey
                P. Baker - President and CEO

            	
              $380,000

            	
              $342,000

            	
              $400,0001

            
	John
              D. Bamberger - Chief Operating Officer	
              $380,000

            	
              $342,000

            	
              $380,000

            
	
              David
                J. Steichen - Chief Financial Officer

            	
              $210,000

            	
              $199,500

            	
              $210,000

            
	Colleen M. Davenport - Secretary &
              General Counsel	
              $210,000

            	
              $199,500

            	
              $210,000

            


    

     

     

     

    
      

    

    
      
        1
          Mr.
          Baker’s base compensation effective January 2, 2006 reflects his appointment
          as
          President and CEO.
Clear All

        15 January 2021    

                    San Antonio, Carter Hall Receive COVID-19 Vaccine Pierside                 
                Sailors and Marines aboard the amphibious transport dock ship USS San Antonio (LPD 17) received their first doses of the COVID-19 vaccine Jan. 11 while pierside at Naval Station Norfolk, marking the first time a large group of personnel received vaccines outside of a Military Treatment Facility            

        06 February 2011    

                    Bold Alligator 2012 Tests Navy/Marine Ability to Execute and Control Long Range Sea to Shore Raid                 
                More than 150 Marines from the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (24th MEU) embarked with the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group will conduct a simulated air-toground assault raid against targets at Fort Pickett, Va., Feb. 7, as part of Bold Alligator 2012.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website