alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  California Water Science Center 

#           USGS Participates in 2021 Orange County Youth Environmental Summit      

      By California Water Science Center

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Laboratories 
-  Data 
-  Maps 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  Software 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

From April 19th through the 23rd, 2021, the USGS California Water Science Center (CAWSC) participated in the first virtual Orange County Youth Environmental Summit (YES). The award-winning program, formerly known as the Children's Water Education Festival, offers 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders opportunities for learning and engagement. Through interactive sessions, YES teaches youth that

For this year’s program, presenters were asked to submit short video lessons addressing water-related and environmental issues that support next generation science standards. In the lesson submitted by CAWSC, students were introduced to streamgages and learned about different ways USGS hydrologists measure water height and speed in California's steams and why that's important.

                                        - Download Video

View Media Details

The video posed questions for students to consider and review afterward. The video also introduced students to new terms and concepts. At the end of the video there were hands-on activities for students to try, either at home or in the classroom.

To learn more about YES, visit their website at: https://www.ocyouthsummit.com.

### Contacts

#### Steve Ackley

##### Public Affairs Specialist

California Water Science Center

hackley@usgs.gov

916-278-3105
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 177 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for waivers of 

user fees imposed with respect to applications for reinstatement of taxexempt status of small, subsidiary tax-exempt organizations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. GRIFFITH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for waivers of user fees imposed with respect to applications for reinstatement of tax-exempt status of small, 

subsidiary tax-exempt organizations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 177 IH

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF USER FEES ON REINSTATEMENT 

2 APPLICATIONS OF REINSTATED SMALL, SUB3 SIDIARY TAX-EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS 

4 AFTER AUTOMATIC REVOCATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6033(j) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(4) WAIVER OF USER FEE ON REINSTATE9 MENT APPLICATIONS FOR CERTAIN TAX-EXEMPT

10 SUBSIDIARIES.—If, upon application for reinstate11 ment of status as an organization exempt from tax 

12 under section 501(a), an organization described in 

13 paragraph (1) can show that— 

14 ‘‘(A) the organization has, after the failure 

15 described in paragraph (1), filed any return or 

16 notice with respect to which such failure to file 

17 triggered the automatic revocation referred to 

18 in paragraph (1), and 

19 ‘‘(B) the organization— 

20 ‘‘(i) is a subsidiary of an entity that 

21 is exempt from tax under section 501(a), 

22 and 

23 ‘‘(ii) that subsidiary, for each of the 3 

24 consecutive years referred to in paragraph 

25 (1) relating to such failure, has fewer than 

26 50 members (as reported to such entity), 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 177 IH

1 the organization’s exempt status shall be reinstated 

2 effective from the date of the revocation under such 

3 paragraph and the Secretary shall waive any user 

4 fee imposed with respect to such application.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to applications for 

7 reinstatement filed after the date of the enactment of this 

8 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  California Water Science Center Newsletters 

# California Waters - Spring 2023 - Vol. III | Issue II

Welcome to the Spring 2023 edition of the USGS California Water Science Center newsletter. The purpose of this newsletter is to keep its readers updated with current research projects, the latest publications, and other work the center is doing.

**Subscribe**Subscribe

June 21, 2023 | Vol. III | Issue II

####               Neonicotinoid Findings          

####               Partnership Aids Delta Smelt          

####               Heavy: Software for forward-modeling gravity change from MODFLOW output          

## Five-year scientific study concludes

### Results of Hexavalent Chromium Background Study in Hinkley, California

Learn more

####               Hinkley: Six Page Summary          

####               Scientists Discuss Research at Geological Society of America Meeting          

####               Sediment transport in two tributaries to the San Joaquin River immediately below Friant Dam—Cottonwood Creek and Little Dry Creek, California          

####               UAS mapping of surface roughness and digital grain size to assess pre-dam removal baseline conditions along the mainstem Klamath River corridor below Iron Gate Dam, California          

####               Multiresidue extraction of current-use pesticides from complex solid matrices using energized dispersive guided extraction with analysis by gas and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy          

####               Comparing domestic and public-supply groundwater quality in the northern San Joaquin Valley, 2019—California GAMA Priority Basin Project
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 32 Filed 07/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 32 Filed 07/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
[Exhibit 32.2]

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Med
Gen, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Jack Chien, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

    (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date: February 16, 2006

                                       /s/ JACK CHIEN
                                       -----------------------
                                       Jack Chien
                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Philip Quinn, Petitioner, v Edward A. Simmons et al., Constituting the Nassau County Civil Service Commission, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review an undated determination of the Nassau County Civil Service Commission which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner was not a resident of Nassau County as required by Nassau County Administrative Code § 13-1.0, and which directed that his employment by Nassau County be terminated.

Ordered that the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

In *Tanner v County of Nassau*(88 AD2d 661), this court held that an employee of Nassau County could not properly be dismissed on the basis of nonresidency *(see,*Nassau County Administrative Code § 13-1.0) without first having been given an opportunity to be heard. Although the court referred to Civil Service Law § 75 in the *Tanner*decision, it did not hold that such a residency hearing must be held before "the officer or body having the power to remove the [employee]” (Civil Service Law § 75 [2]). On the contrary, such a hearing may be held before the Nassau County Civil Service Commission, which is empowered to enforce residency requirements *(see,*Nassau County Charter § 1309; Civil Service Law § 17 [1]). Accordingly, there was no need for Nassau County, as the petitioner’s employer, to designate the Nassau County Civil Service Commission as a body authorized to conduct such a *580hearing *(cf., Matter of Wiggins v Board of Educ.,*60 NY2d 385; *Matter of Blount v Forbes,*250 App Div 15). In this case, the Nassau County Civil Service Commission’s finding of nonresidency was supported by substantial evidence *(see generally, Matter of Magrella v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn.,*124 AD2d 660).

We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
(104 So. 913)

#### Ex parte AMERICAN MINE OWNERS MUTUAL, Inc., et al.

(6 Div. 486.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 25, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Percy, Benners & Burr, and Salem Ford, all of Birmingham, for petitioners.

W. F. Finch, of Bake Worth, Fla., opposed.

BOULDIN, J.

Petition of the American

Mine Owners Mutual, Inc., and Summit Coal Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision there rendered in the case of Ex parte Am. Mine Owners Mutual, Inc., et al. (Re Stewart v. Am. Mine Owners Mutual, Inc., et al.), 20 Ala. App. 647, 104 So. 912.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ„ concur.
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

AIA ENGINEERING LIMI TED, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant

- Appellant,

AND

VEGA INDUSTRIES, LTD ., INC.,

Third Party Defendant

- Appellant,

v.

MAGOTTEAUX INTERNATIONAL S/A

AND MAGOTTEAUX, INC., Defendants/Counterclaimants

- Appellees.

______________________

2013

- 1571

______________________
Appeal from t he United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee in No. 09

- CV

- 0255, Judge William Joseph Haynes, Jr.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R Case: 13-1571 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 12/30/2013AIA ENGINEERING LTD

. v. MAGOTTEAUX INTERNATI ONAL 2

Upon consideration of the jointly filed motion to wit hdraw this appeal,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 30, 2013 Case: 13-1571 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 12/30/2013
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8, No.  333-37270)  pertaining to the Fairfield  Communities,  Inc. 2000
Incentive  Stock Plan,  (Form S-3, No.  333-33776)  pertaining to the October 1,
1999 Restricted Stock  Agreement,  (Form S-8, No.  333-55841)  pertaining to the
Fairfield Communities,  Inc. Third Amended and Restated 1992 Warrant Plan, (Form
S-8, No. 333-16605) pertaining to the Fairfield Communities, Inc. Second Amended
and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8, No. 333-27833)  pertaining
to the Fairfield Communities, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option
Plan,  and (Form S-8, No.  333-42901)  pertaining to the Vacation  Break U.S.A.,
Inc. Directors' Stock Option Plan and the Vacation Break U.S.A., Inc. 1995 Stock
Option  Plan  of our  report  dated  February  12,  2001,  with  respect  to the
consolidated  financial statements included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Fairfield Communities, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000.



Little Rock, Arkansas
March 8, 2001
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Carabello, Appellant.

Supreme Court, New York County (Peter McQuillan, J.), rendered on April 2, 1985, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Ross, J. P., Asch, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
#                                                                         USS Colorado Returns from Deployment                                                                    

##### by Chief Petty Officer Joshua Karsten

20 December 2023GROTON, Connecticut -- 
Capt. Jason Grizzle, commander of Submarine Squadron (SUBRON) 12, under which Colorado operates, praised the crew’s successful deployment and welcomed them home “just in time for the holidays.”“It’s always great to have a homecoming and see families reunited,” Grizzle said. “But to have one just in time for Christmas – seeing the joy and happiness on the pier today – it really emphasizes the sacrifice and commitment a submariner and their family makes to protect our nation’s interests.”“Our submarines are unparalleled in the undersea domain, but submarines cannot execute their mission without the men and women who put in the work,” Grizzle added. “And they cannot operate without the love, support, and sacrifices their families make here at home - it’s truly a rewarding experience.”Beam commended his crew for their performace on the submarine’s third deployment saying he is “happy to be home just in time for Christmas and I couldn't be prouder of my crew and our amazing families.”During its deployment to the U.S. European Command area of responsibility, Colorado steamed nearly 36,000 nautical miles and made port calls to Grøtsund, Norway, and Rota, Spain. Thirty personnel earned their submarine warfare devices – commonly referred to as “dolphins” – during the deployment and one Colorado sailor had new baby.Taylor Hartman, wife of Lt.j.g. Forrest Hartman, said she was “happy they could be home before the holidays to be with their families before partaking in the ceremonial “first hug” with her son Riker, 5, and daughter Charlie, 2.“It means everything because I’m going to let my kids be the first one to hug him because they’ve been looking forward to it, said Taylor Hartman during the homecoming event. “My son has been doing a countdown everyday looking at the calendar - and being this close to Christmas, it’s better than any present.SSN 788 was commissioned March 17, 2018 and is the fourth U.S. warship named after the state of Colorado. It has a length of 377 feet with a beam of 34 feet and a crew of more than 134 personnel.The Virginia-class of nuclear-powered fast attack submarines are designed for a broad spectrum of open-ocean and littoral missions. Fast-attack submarines are multi-mission platforms enabling five of the six Navy maritime strategy core capabilities – sea control, power projection, forward presence, maritime security and deterrence. They are designed to excel in anti-submarine warfare, anti-ship warfare, strike warfare, special operations, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, irregular warfare and mine warfare. Fast-attack submarines project power ashore with special operations forces and Tomahawk cruise missiles in the prevention or response to regional crises.

Tags:
**deployment**USS Colorado (SSN 788)**Groton**Connecticut

Terms:
**Submarines
The Honorable Jimm L. Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Judge for 1 the Western District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2328

___________ Ronnie Furman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Simmons Foods, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 28, 1998 Filed: November 2, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ronnie Furman appeals the district court & s grant of summary judgment t o 1 defendant Simmons Fo ods, Inc. in Furman & s action brought under the Americans with Disabi lities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. Having reviewed the record and th e parties & submissions on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was warrante d becauseFurman failed to show that he has a disability within the meaning of the Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2) (to establish disability, plaintiff must show he suffers, has-2-

a r ecord of suffering, or is perceived as suffering, from “a physical or menta l imp airment that substantially limits one or more of [his] major life activities”); Webb v. Mercy Hosp. , 102 F.3d 958, 959-60 (8th Cir. 1996) (setting forth elements of prima facie ADA discrimination case). The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 47 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 47 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 35 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 35 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 2 of 2
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

JUAN JARA 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OE AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

90 CHURCH STREET LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, ET. AL., CASE T\TUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 05363 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower B Co L.P. and WFP Tower B Co. 

GP Corp. (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the 

Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield 

Parties' Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed 

in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October IS 2007 

Fa Scbe~ker & Blee, LLP 

J. Smitli (W~T~-~137) 

ALtornevls for the Brookfield Parties 

TvSqRe~tor Street, 20fh Floor 

New York, NY 10006 

(212) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         May 14, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gloria B. Levin, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3166, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1017, leving@csr.nih.gov.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.305, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 1, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-11597  Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M