alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#                                                                         “It’s More Like it Chose Me;” Cherry Point Sailor Answers Call to Radiology                                                                    

##### by Thomas Cieslak

28 July 2023

                Hospitalman Miguel Rodriguez serves on the Radiology team aboard Naval Health Clinic Cherry Point. The Brownsville, Texas native recently passed the challenging America Registry of Radiologic Technologists Registry exam, earning himself the formal designation as a Radiologic Technologist.            

                “It’s More Like it Chose Me;” Cherry Point Sailor Answers Call to Radiology            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Thomas Cieslak

VIRIN: 230726-O-KJ310-3025

                Hospitalman Miguel Rodriguez serves on the Radiology team aboard Naval Health Clinic Cherry Point. The Brownsville, Texas native recently passed the challenging America Registry of Radiologic Technologists Registry exam, earning himself the formal designation as a Radiologic Technologist.            

                “It’s More Like it Chose Me;” Cherry Point Sailor Answers Call to Radiology            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Thomas Cieslak

VIRIN: 230726-O-KJ310-3025

Tags:
**Navy medicine
# C_2009001EN.01000301.xml

| 6.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2009/C 1/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 27.10.2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | France |
| Aid No | N 198/08 |
| Title | Aides à la recherche et au développement dans le secteur de la viande, des produits carnés, des ovo-produits, du lait et des produits laitiers |
| Objective | To encourage research and development in the meat product, egg product, milk and milk product sectors |
| Legal basis | Articles L 621-1 et suivants du Code rural, décision du directeur de l'office national interprofessionnel de l'élevage, approuvée par le conseil plénier |
| Budget | EUR 9 600 000 |
| Aid intensity or amount | 100 % |
| Duration | Six years, up until 31.12.2013 |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

27.10.2008

Member State

France

Aid No

N 198/08

Title

Aides à la recherche et au développement dans le secteur de la viande, des produits carnés, des ovo-produits, du lait et des produits laitiers

Objective

To encourage research and development in the meat product, egg product, milk and milk product sectors

Legal basis

Articles L 621-1 et suivants du Code rural, décision du directeur de l'office national interprofessionnel de l'élevage, approuvée par le conseil plénier

Budget

EUR 9 600 000

Aid intensity or amount

100 %

Duration

Six years, up until 31.12.2013

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
AND CCC SURETY OPERATIONS EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
AND SCHEDULES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           389,396
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 424,175
<CASH>                                           3,424
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              55,008
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          67,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 740,871
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                132,100
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            177,520
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                118,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              434
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     266,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   740,871
<PREMIUMS>                                      58,745
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              6,789
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      11,218
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     24,464
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            10,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,815
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,815
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAIME RAMIREZ

,

Appellant

,

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 074

- C R

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20100C08395 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jaime Ramirez has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. Rule 42.2(a) permits an

appellate court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the appellant ’ s motion at any time before the

court ’ s decision. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.2(a). Finding that Appellant has complied with the

requirements of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion an d dismiss the appeal.

September 14, 2016

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH     Document 20      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH     Document 20      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH     Document 20      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 3 of 3
Clear All

        05 April 2023    

                    USS Nitze Returns from Deployment                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) returned to its homeport of Naval Station Norfolk, April 5, 2023, following an eight-month deployment to the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operation.            

        11 March 2023    

                    USS Nitze (DDG 94) Arrives in Valletta, Malta                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) arrived in Valletta, Malta, for a scheduled port visit, March 11, 2023.             

        05 February 2023    

                    USS Nitze (DDG 94) arrives at Gölcük Naval Base in Türkiye                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) arrived at Gölcük Naval Base, Türkiye, for a scheduled port visit on February 3, 2023.            

        27 October 2022    

                    U.S. Navy Rescues Mariners from Burning Vessel in Gulf of Aden                 
                MANAMA, Bahrain - Personnel from two U.S. Navy ships rescued three civilian mariners Oct. 26 in the Gulf of Aden after their small motorboat caught fire while transiting international waters.            

        01 August 2022    

                    U.S., Israel Begin Maritime Exercise in Red Sea                 
                Naval forces from Israel and the United States began a four-day maritime exercise in the Red Sea, Aug. 1.            

        17 July 2022    

                    USS Nitze Departs on Deployment                 
                NORFOLK, Va. (July 17, 22) – Nearly 360 Sailors aboard guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) departed Naval Station Norfolk on a scheduled independent deployment, July 17.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

INTEREST RECOVERY, INC., and )

WILLIAM CRESCENZO; )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2879

)

PAT FRANK, AS CLERK OF )

COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH )

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR )

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; ) 

SHEILA M. HENSLEY; JORGE L. )

DE LA BARRA; et. al., )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.130 from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Laurel M. Lee, 

Judge.

Ann M. Allison of Allison Law Group, 

Tampa, for Appellants.

David M. Caldevilla and Donald C.P. 

Greiwe of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., 

Tampa; and Dale K. Bohner, General 

Counsel for the Clerk, Tampa, for 

Appellee Pat Frank, Clerk of the Court.

No appearance for remaining 

Appellees.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        08 January 2024    

                    USS McFaul Returns Home from 8-month Deployment                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - The Arleigh-Burke class guided-missile destroyer USS McFaul (DDG 74) returned to Norfolk, Va., Jan. 4, 2024 after an 8-month deployment to the Atlantic Ocean and U.S. 5th Fleet areas of operations.            

        12 April 2023    

                    Taking Care of People: Building Team 74 Starts Day One                 
                NEWPORT NEWS, Va. - Working in a shipyard environment is tough, especially for the U.S. Navy’s newest Sailors. Not only are new check-ins coming from boot camp trying to figure out their new rating and jobs, but the shipyard provides an even more complex and often difficult physical work            

        25 January 2023    

                    MAKO Challenge Increases Warfighting Readiness for Navy Reserve                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - Reserve Sailors from U.S. Fleet Forces (USFF), U.S. 2nd Fleet, U.S. 4th Fleet, U.S. 6th Fleet, and U.S. 10th Fleet conducted MAKO Challenge 23, an operational level of warfare (OLW) exercise within a Maritime Operations Center (MOC) scenario, from Jan. 19-22 at the Navy Warfare            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE

JUDGE OF TRIAL DIVISION, FIRST

JUDICIAL DISTRICT :

:

:

:

:

: No. 382

Judicial Classification Docket

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18 th day of December , 2023, in accordance with the general

supervisory and administrative powers vested in this Court by Article V, Section 10 of the

Pennsylvania Constitution, t he Honorable Lisette Shirdan

- Harris, who is serving at the

pleasure of this Court as the Administrative Judge of the Trial Division of the First Judicial

District of Pennsylvania, is hereby relieved of said assignment, effective December 31,

202 3

. Further, all duties of the position of Administrative Judge of the Trial Divis ion of the

First Judicial District of Pennsylvania are hereby reposed in t he Honorable Daniel J.

Anders, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania,

for a term of three years or at the pleasure of this Court, effectiv e January 1, 2024.
EXHIBIT 21 
 
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 
 
 
                                   Jurisdiction of     Other Names Under Which 
Name                                 Organization         Business Conducted 
----                               ---------------     ----------------------- 
 
Robbins Hardwood Flooring, Inc.    Delaware 
 
BHFL Corp.                         Delaware 
 
BHFG Corp.                         Delaware 
 
Bruce Hardwood Flooring, L.P.      Texas               "Bruce Hardwood Floors" 
                                                        "Premier Wood Floors" 
 
Hartco Flooring Company            Tennessee 
 
HFCG Corp.                         Delaware 
 
HFCL Corp.                         Delaware 
 
Hartco Hardwood Flooring, L.P.     Delaware          "Hartco Flooring Company" 
 
DTM Corp.                          Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 30 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 30 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 30 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 31 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Edwin M. Larkin, Respondent-Appellant, v Present Company, Appellant-Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict awarding plaintiff $55,200 for legal fees on a quantum meruit basis. When the $15,000 advanced to plaintiff by defendant is added to that amount, the total fee is $70,200, or $135 per hour for 453 hours of securities work and 67.5 hours of general corporate work. That amount is substantially the same as the amount which defendant conceded that it had agreed to pay plaintiff. It was established that $135 per hour was the rate that defendant had paid the Mousaw firm for work performed by plaintiff while he was with that firm. Further, there was testimony that defendant paid the Mousaw firm $150 per hour to complete the offering. Thus, even excluding the testimony of plaintiff’s experts, there was ample evidence that $135 per hour was a reasonable fee. Additionally, one of plaintiff’s experts, a partner in the accounting firm of Peat, Marwick, testified that a reasonable legal fee for a public offering of this size would range from $60,000 to $100,000. Plaintiff’s other expert, a securities lawyer from New York City, testified that *1006600 hours of legal work is reasonable for a public offering of this size. Those experts were qualified to testify *(see, Matott v Ward,*48 NY2d 455, 459; Richardson, Evidence § 368 [Prince 10th ed]) and defendant’s objections bear on the weight to be accorded such testimony, not its admissibility. At any rate, in view of the other competent evidence that established the reasonableness of plaintiff’s fee, any error in admitting the expert testimony was harmless.

The evidence also supports the jury’s determination that defendant’s payment of $22,500 to the Mousaw firm to complete the offering was not reasonably required to rectify deficiencies in plaintiff’s performance. The work performed by the Mousaw firm largely duplicated the work already performed by plaintiff. Defendant had never expressed dissatisfaction with plaintiff’s work and in fact refused to accept his resignation prior to the closing.

On plaintiff’s cross appeal, plaintiff challenges the propriety of the jury’s determination that he spent less time on the stock offering than he claimed. In his testimony, plaintiff revealed that he spent a great deal of time performing clerical functions because secretarial help was not always available. The jury was entitled to conclude that plaintiff should not recover attorney’s fees for such tasks. Although the judgment does not fully compensate plaintiff for his disbursements, he failed to preserve that error for review by objecting to the court’s instruction, the special verdict question, the jury’s finding, or the judgment. We decline to consider it for the first time at this stage. (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — legal fee.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 4 of 4
Clear All

        05 March 2021    

#                     Guest Speaker: Commander, Surface Force Atlantic Change of Command Ceremony                  

                Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, remarks as presiding officer and guest speaker for commander, Surface Force Atlantic change of command ceremony, held aboard USS Mesa Verde (LPD 19), Norfolk Naval Station, March 5, 2021.            

        13 January 2021    

#                     Keynote Address: Surface Navy Association National Symposium                 

                Remarks as delivered by Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.            

        15 August 2019    

#                     2019 AFCEA/USNI West Conference                 

                Remarks as delivered by Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.             

        13 August 2019    

#                     Virginia Peninsula Chamber of Commerce Leadership Forum                 

                Remarks as delivered by Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.             

        17 January 2019    

#                     2019 Surface Navy Association (SNA) Symposium                 

                Remarks as delivered by Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.             

        05 November 2018    

#                     2018 Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY) Apprenticeship Program Graduation                 

                Remarks as delivered by Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.             

        24 August 2018    

#                     Commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet Establishment Ceremony                 

                Remarks as delivered by Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Padilla, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Snyder, J.), rendered on or about May 19, 1987, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kassal, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
[Exhibit 31.1]

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/
 RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Paul B. Kravitz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Med Gen, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b) [Not applicable]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2007                   /s/ PAUL B. KRAVITZ
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Paul B. Kravitz
                                       Chief Executive Officer