22630 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2001 / Notices

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9091

(previously Docket No. 29479).

Petitioner: Skydive U, Inc. formerly

known as Skydive Utah, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

105.43(a).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit SUI’s nonstudent

foreign nationals to participate in SUIsponsored parachute jumping events

held at SUI’s facilities without

complying with the parachute

equipment and packing requirement of

§ 105.43(a). Grant, 04/10/2001,

Exemption No. 6928A.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8741

(previously Docket No. 29218).

Petitioner: Cessna Aircraft Company.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

91.409(b).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit owners and

operators of Cessna Model 172R, 172S,

and 182S (C–172R, C–172S, and C–

182S, respectively) airplanes to use

Cessna’s PhaseCard Inspection Program

rather than completing the required 100-

hour inspection. Grant, 04/10/201,

Exemption No. 6901B.

Docket No.: 29975

Petitioner: Express Airlines I, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

121.434(c)(1)(ii).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Express to

substitute a qualified and authorized

check airman in place of an FAA

inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in

command who is completing initial or

upgrade training specified in § 121.424

during at least one flight leg that

includes a takeoff and a landing. Grant,

04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7504.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8877.

Petitioner: Piedmont Aviation

Services, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

25.857(c), and 25.858, 121.314(c).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit two Boeing

Model 737–200 airplanes to operate

from March 20, 2001, until September

15, 2001, without being fitted with fire

suppression equipment. Denial, 03/13/

2001, Exemption No. 7457.

Docket No.: FAA–2000–8492.

Petitioner: The Boeing Company.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

25.1435(b)(1).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit amended type

certification of the Boeing Models 777–

200LR and 777–300ER by conducting a

3400 psig (the system relief pressure)

test of the modified or added hydraulic

tubing runs and any rerouted sections

while verifying that adequate clearances

exist. Partial Grant, 03/28/2001,

Exemption No. 7478.

[FR Doc. 01–11259 Filed 5–3–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–2001–35]

Petitions for Exemption, Summary of

Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior

petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption part 11 of Title 14, Code

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this

notice contains a summary of

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received. The purpose of this

notice is to improve the public’s

awareness of, and participation in, this

aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities.

Neither publication of this notice nor

the inclusion or omission of information

in the summary is intended to affect the

legal status of any petition or its final

disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Forest Rawls (202) 267–8033, Sandy

Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–7271, or

Vanessa Wilkins (202) 267–8029, Office

of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal

Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591.

This notice is published pursuant to

14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 30,

2001.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9010.

Petitioner: Kitty Hawk Charters, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Kitty Hawk to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/16/2001, Exemption No. 7506.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8787.

Petitioner: Flight Alaska, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Flight Alaska to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/16/2001, Exemption No. 7505.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8865.

Petitioner: Corporate Air, LLC.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Corporate Air to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7498.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9033.

Petitioner: Silverhawk Aviation, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Silverhawk to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7499.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9105.

Petitioner: Ameristar Jet Charter, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.13(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Ameristar to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7500.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9031.

Petitioner: Houston Helicopters, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit HHI to operate

certain aircraft under part 135 without

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder

installed in the aircraft. Grant, 04/12/

2001, Exemption No. 7501.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9100.

Petitioner: Tex-Air Helicopters, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Tex-Air to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7502.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8871.

Petitioner: Mentone Flying Club, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.231, 135.255, 135.353, and

appendixes I and J to part 121.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Mentone to

conduct sightseeing flights at Fulton

County Airport for the one-day Round

Barn Festival charitable event in June

2001, for compensation or hire, without

complying with certain anti-drug and

alcohol misuse prevention requirements

of part 135. Grant, 04/12/2001,

Exemption No. 7503.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2001 / Notices 22631

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9081.

Petitioner: Helicopter Experts, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit HEI to operate

certain aircraft under part 135 without

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder

installed in the aircraft. Grant, 04/12/

2001, Exemption No. 7497.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9166

(previously Docket No. 30076).

Petitioner: TACA International

Airlines.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

121.344(b).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit TAI to operate

five Airbus A300 airplanes (Registration

Nos. N59106, N59107, N59139, N59140,

and N68142) without installing the

required DFDR on each airplane until

August 20, 2001. Grant, 04/17/2001,

Exemption No. 7350A.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9166

(previously Docket No. 28828).

Petitioner: North American Airlines

Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

119.67(a)(1).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Edward F.

Dascoli to act as the Director of

Operations for NAA without holding an

airline transport pilot certificate. Grant,

04/13/2001, Exemption No. 7510.

[FR Doc. 01–11260 Filed 5–3–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Impose and Use the Revenue From

a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Chico Municipal Airport, Chico, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on

application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to impose and use the

revenue from a PFC at Chico Municipal

Airport under the provisions of the

Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion

Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990)

(Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

Part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before June 4, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate to the FAA at the following

address: Federal Aviation

Administration, Airports Division,

15000 Aviation Blvd., Lawndale, CA

90261, or San Francisco Airports

District Office, 831 Mitten Road, Room

210 Burlingame, CA 94010–1303. In

addition, one copy of any comments

submitted to the FAA must be mailed or

delivered to Mr. Robert A. Grierson,

Airport Manager of the Chico Municipal

Airport, at the following address: City of

Chico, P.O. Box 3420, Chico, CA 95927.

Air carriers and foreign air carriers may

submit copies of written comments

previously provided to the city of Chico

under section 158.23 of Part 158.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marlys Vandervelde, Airports Program

Analyst, San Francisco Airports District

Office, 831 Mitten Road, Room 210,

Burlingame, CA 94010–1303, Telephone

(650) 876–2806. The application may be

reviewed in person at this same

location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to impose

and use the revenue from PFC at Chico

Municipal Airport under the provisions

of the Aviation Safety and Capacity

Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of

1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14

CFR Part 158). On April 4, 2001, the

FAA determined that the application to

impose and use a PFC submitted by the

city of Chico was substantially complete

within the requirements of § 158.25 of

Part 158. The FAA will approve or

disapprove the application, in whole or

in part, no later than July 3, 2001.

The following is a brief overview of

the impose and use application No. 01–

04–C–00–CIC:

Level of proposed PFC: $3.00.

Proposed charge effective date:

November 1, 2001.

Proposed charge expiration date:

September 1, 2006.

Total estimated PFC revenue:

$536,747.

Brief description of the proposed

projects: Access road and drainage

facilities between Fortress Street and

aircraft parking apron development

including complete engineering design

and construction; Rehabilitate

underground electrical duct and cable

system-electrical vault to terminal to

airport traffic control tower to apron

edge; Runway 13L/31R pavement

rehabilitation; Fortress Street overlay

and reconstruction; Commercial road

development-road construction and gate

controls-Boeing Avenue, Convair Court,

Fairchild Court, Lockheed Court, Piper

Court, and Alley Road; New airfield

sweeper: Replace airfield guidance

signs-3 and noise abatement signs-2;

Overlay runway 13R/31L and taxiways

B, D, E & F between parallel runways;

Expand T-hangar area taxiway and

connect T-hangar taxiway to taxiway A;

Acquire insulation suits for aircraft fire

and rescue personnel; Airport master

plan study; infield grading; Extend

security fence ditch crossings; Improve

emergency access and service road to

west side of airport; and Installation of

automated weather observation system.

Class or classes of air carriers which

the public agency has requested not be

required to collect PFCs: None.

Any person may inspect the

application in person at the FAA office

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA

Regional Airports Division located at:

Federal Aviation Administration,

Airports Division, 15000 Aviation Blvd.,

Lawndale, CA 90261. In addition, any

person may, upon request, inspect the

application, notice and other documents

germane to the application in person at

the city of Chico.

Issued in Hawthorne, California, on April

4, 2001.

Herman C. Bliss,

Manager, Airports Division, Western-Pacific

Region.

[FR Doc. 01–11263 Filed 5–3–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

(01–05–C–00–EGE) To Impose and To

Use a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC)

at the Eagle County Regional Airport,

Submitted by the County of Eagle, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on

application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to impose and use PFC

revenue at the Walker Field Airport

under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 40117

and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before June 4, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate to the FAA at the following

address: Alan Wiechmann, Manager;

Denver Airports District Office, DEN–

ADO; Federal Aviation Administration;