alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        27 February 2024    

                    Navy Pins First Robotics Warfare Specialist                 
                The Chief of Naval Personnel, Vice Adm. Rick Cheeseman, and the Navy’s Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13) Director, Rear Adm. Jim Waters, pinned Master Chief Christopher Rambert as the Navy’s first Robotics Warfare Specialist during an office call at Naval Support Facility            

        11 August 2022    

                    25th Annual RoboSub Competition Showcases an Autonomous Future                 
                ARLINGTON, Va. - This past week, the 25th Annual RoboSub competition occurred at the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland. RoboSub is an international robotics competition where student teams design, build, test and operate their own robotic submarines — autonomous underwater vehicles            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with amendment no. 2 to the annual report of MobiClear, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth G.C. Telford, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Kenneth G.C. Telford

Kenneth G.C. Telford

Chief Financial Officer

June 3, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-17-00276-CR 

Nathan Nieuwenhuyse 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From County Criminal Court No. 1 

of Denton County 

(CR-2016-09008-A) 

November 2, 2017 

Opinion by Justice Kerr 

(nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Elizabeth Kerr_________________ 

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

ROBOTIC VISION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
---------------------------------------------

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE AMOUNTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
-----------------------------------------------------


                                        1997            1996          1995
                                        ----            ----          ----
                                     Restated         Restated      Restated
                                     (Note 2)         (Note 2)      (Note 2)

PRIMARY:
Net income                            $ 8,245          $ 9,726       $10,995
                                      -------          -------       -------

Weighted average number of common
  shares                               20,888           20,166        17,618  

Assumed number of shares issued
  from common share equivalents           833            1,220         2,255
                                      -------          -------       -------

Weighted average number of common 
  and common equivalent shares         21,721           21,386        19,872
                                      -------          -------       -------

Net income per share:
  Primary                             $   .38          $   .45       $  0.55
                                      -------          -------       -------

FULLY DILUTED:
Net income                            $ 8,245          $ 9,726       $10,995
                                      -------          -------       -------

Weighted average number of common
  shares                               20,888           20,166        17,618

Assumed number of shares issued
  from common share equivalents           918            1,227         2,377
                                      -------          -------       -------

Weighted average number of common
  and common equivalents shares        21,806           21,393        19,995
                                      -------          -------       -------

Net income per share:

  Fully diluted                       $   .38          $   .45       $  0.55
                                      -------          -------       -------
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hypercom Corporation
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I certify that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2003 of Hypercom Corporation (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Hypercom Corporation.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | By: /s/ John W. Smolak 
| |                        
| | John W. Smolak         
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | August 13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            7634
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1727
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      29792
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         300627
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  351007
<DEPOSITS>                                      203179
<SHORT-TERM>                                     73550
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1456
<LONG-TERM>                                       1375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       71398
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  351007
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  19270
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1434
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   107
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 20811
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                6047
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8791
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            12020
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      765
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (15)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6265
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        6265
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4188
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.15
<LOANS-NON>                                       2691
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2056
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      542
<RECOVERIES>                                       261
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2540
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2540
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated December 20, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1977 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-233753) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 20, 2019
A92A0962.

#### BOOKOUT v. THE STATE.

(423 SE2d 7)

Carley, Presiding Judge.

After a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of aggravated sodomy, aggravated child molestation and cruelty to children. He appeals from the judgments of conviction and sentences entered by the trial court on the jury’s guilty verdicts.

1. Appellant enumerates the general grounds as to his convictions for aggravated sodomy and aggravated child molestation.

Pursuant to OCGA § 24-3-16, several witnesses testified to statements made to them by the five-year-old victim. These statements attributed to the victim were descriptive of appellant’s commission of the acts of aggravated sodomy and aggravated child molestation alleged in the indictment. The State did not call the victim as a witness. However, the victim was available to testify and appellant did not request that the trial court cause the victim to be called as a witness. See *Sosebee v. State,*257 Ga. 298 (357 SE2d 562) (1987).

“By its terms, [OCGA § 24-3-16] allows the prosecution to satisfy its burden of proof under certain circumstances by introducing the alleged victim’s hearsay declarations without putting the victim on the stand.” *Sosebee v. State,*supra at 299. “The law requires only that the child be available to testify; it does not require the child to corroborate the hearsay testimony. [Cit.]” *Jones v. State,*200 Ga. App. 103 (407 SE2d 85) (1991). Construing the evidence most strongly against appellant, it was sufficient to authorize a rational trior of fact to find proof of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. There was no error in the trial court’s admission of “other transactions” evidence. “The rule allowing similar transaction evidence ‘has been most liberally extended in the area of sexual offenses,’ [cit.]; and this court has held that the ‘sexual molestation of young children, regardless of sex or type of act, is sufficient similarity to make the evidence admissible.’ [Cits.]” *Jackson v. State,*198 Ga. App. 447, 448 (1) (402 SE2d 279) (1991). “[I]n sexually oriented offenses, evidence of prior acts is admissible to show lustful disposition. . . .” *Jones v. State,*172 Ga. App. 347, 348 (2) (323 SE2d 174) (1984).

*Judgments affirmed.*

*Pope and Johnson, JJ., concur.*

*531Decided September 8, 1992

Reconsideration denied September 23, 1992

*Charles G. Wright, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Ralph L. Van Pelt, Jr., District Attorney, Michael R. McCarthy, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 32 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 32 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 24, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00585

- CR

Carlos Santos HUERTA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR4979

Honorable Ray Olivarri , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on September 24, 2014

.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of September, 2014

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
#                                                                         Active-duty Military, Veterans and Students Pay Tribute to Gold Star Families during Somerset Community Event                                                                    

##### by Jennifer Cragg

29 May 2024

                SOMERSET, New Jersey (May 23, 2024) More than 200 veterans, active-duty service members supporting Fleet Week New York, civilians, and Gold Star families attended a patriotic “Proud to be an American Day” event in Somerset. Vice Adm. John Gumbleton, commander, Task Group 80, and deputy commander, U.S. Fleet Forces served as one of the military guest speakers who honored the sacrifices of Gold Star families. Fleet Week New York is a time-honored sea service celebration that allows citizens of New York City and the surrounding tri-state region to witness today’s maritime capabilities first-hand. The 2024 celebration will host nearly 3,000 Sailors, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen. (U.S. Navy photo by Jennifer Cragg)            

                240523-N-PN306-1001            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Jennifer Cragg

VIRIN: 240523-N-PN306-1001

Tags:
**FWNY**fleet week new york
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2562

EARL C. WALTON, Agent; CARL L. PHILLIPS,

Agent; CHARLES A. BROWN, Agent,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

TIDEWATER VIRGINIA FEDERAL EMPLOYEES METAL

TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO,

Defendant - Appellee,

JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge.

(CA-94-967)

Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 13, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Francis Hennessy, III, SuAnne Leigh Hardee, Chesapeake,

Virginia, for Appellants. Sally Momsen Tedrow, Robert Matisoff,

O'DONOGHUE & O'DONOGHUE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants seek to appeal an order of the district court dismissing Tidewater Virginia Federal Employees Metal Trades Council,

AFL-CIO (the Union), from this proceeding. The action continues

against John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy. The Union has moved

to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here

appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order.

We grant the Union's motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal

as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.4


 


AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment
(the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement entered into
August 19, 2004 between Richard C. Notebaert (the “Executive”) and Qwest
Services Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the “Company”) (the “Employment
Agreement”) and previously amended on October 21, 2005, is made and
entered into on December       , 2005 between the
Executive and the Company.


 


WITNESSETH THAT:


 


WHEREAS, the
parties previously entered into the Employment Agreement pertaining to the
employment of the Executive by the Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects as set
forth herein;


 


WHEREAS, the
parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement to address uncertainties created
by certain regulations promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
below, the Executive and Company hereby amend the Employment Agreement as
follows:


 


1.                                       The
last sentence of Subparagraph 3(f) is hereby amended in its entirety to
provide as follows:


 


 (f) 
With respect to all option grants except those awarded on March 4, 2005
(2,000,000 options with an exercise price of $3.89) and March 3, 2003
(2,000,000 options with an exercise price of $3.44), in the event the Executive
resigns or retires from the employ of the Company after December 31, 2006
any such vested option shall be exercisable for six (6) years following
such date of termination of employment, but in no event later than the
expiration of the term of the option, but only to the extent that under Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code this extension of time to exercise would not be
viewed as a deferral of compensation.


 


2.                                       Except
as specifically set forth above, the Employment Agreement, as previously
amended, remains in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand, and the Company has caused
this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf, all on the day and
year first above written.


 





















 


	
   

  	
  COMPANY:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  QWEST
  SERVICES CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ATTEST:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Richard C.
  Notebaert

  
				



 


2