N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M ILTON M EDR

ANO-TOR

RES; DOR IAN OSM AN FAVILENATOR RES, Pe titione rs, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-71356 Age n c y Nos. A077-460-539 A077-460-538 M EM O R ANDUM *

M ILTON M EDR

ANO-TOR

RES, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-72910 Age n c y No. A077-460-539 

# F IL ED DEC 02 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. M ilton M e drano-Torre s a nd Doria n Osm an Favile na -Torre s, na tive s a nd c itiz e ns of Nic ara gua , pe tition for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing the i r a ppe a l from

an im m i gration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing the ir a

pplic ation for a sy lum , withholding of rem ova l, a n d re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture(“ C AT” ) (No. 11-71356). In a ddition, M ilton M e d rano-Torre s pe titions for re vie w of the B IA’ s orde r de ny ing his motion to re c o nside r, whic h

the B IA c onstrue d

a s both a m otion to re c onside r and a se c ond m otion to re o pe n (No. 11-72910). Our jurisdic tion is governe d by

8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e dism i ss in pa rt a nd de ny in pa

rt the pe t itions for re v ie w. W ith re spe c t to pe titione r Favile na -Torre s (A077-460-538), the B IA re ope n e d and re m a nde d proc e e dings for c onside ra tion of a n a pplic ation for a djustm e nt of sta

tus. C onse que ntly , the re is no fina l orde r of re m ova l in e ffe c t for Favile na -Torre s a

nd the c ourt la c ks jurisdic tion ove r the pe tition for re vie w (No. 11-71356) a s to him . Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a)(1); Lope z -Ruiz v . Ashc roft , 298 F.3d

** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 1 1 - 7 1 3 5 6 /1 1 - 7 2 9 1 0886, 887 (9th C ir. 2002) (orde r) (dism issing, without pre j udic e , for la c k of jurisdic tion). Thus, we

dism iss thepe tition for re v ie w (No. 11-71356) a s to Favile na -Torre s. Furthe r, we la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the B IA’ s July 20, 2011, order de ny ing M e drano-Torre s’ s m otion to re ope n to a djust sta tus, be c a use he did not file a pe t ition for re vie w of tha t orde r. Se e Stone

v . IN S, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995); Martine z -Se rrano v . IN

S , 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th C ir. 1996). Fina lly , M e drano-Torre s doe s not ra ise any argum e nts in his ope

ning brie f re ga rding e ithe r the B IA’ s de nia l of his a pplic at ion for a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, a

nd C AT re l i e f (No. 11-71356), or the B IA’ s de n ia l of his m otion to re c o nside r and se c ond m otion to re ope n (No. 11-72910). Se e Martine z-Se rrano , 94 F.3d a t 1259-60 (issue s not supporte d by argum e nt a

re de e m e d wa ive d). PE T IT IO NS FO R

RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

3 1 1 - 7 1 3 5 6 /1 1 - 7 2 9 1 0