alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4017

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

John Luther Session, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: October 7, 1998

 Filed: October 16, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BRIGHT, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found John Luther Session guilty of conspiring to distribute cocaine base,

and of distributing and aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine base on March

7 and 11, 1997, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B).

Session withdrew post-trial motions for judgment of acquittal and for mistrial in

exchange for the government&s stipulation to a three-level acceptance-of-responsibility

reduction for sentencing purposes. At sentencing, Session objected to the presentence

report&s drug-quantity calculation and testified on his own behalf that he had delivered

no more than 3 grams of cocaine base on March 11 and was not involved in the March
The Honorable Donald E. O&Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern 1

District of Iowa.

-2-

7 transaction. The district court found that even without the March 7 amount, Session 1

was responsible for more than 5 grams of cocaine base, as the laboratory report, which

the court found to be credible, stated that the amount delivered on March 11 was 7.61

grams. Taking into account Session&s prior drug-distribution conviction, the court

sentenced him to the statutory minimum of 120 months' imprisonment and 8 years'

supervised release. Appellate counsel moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Session did not file a pro se supplemental brief.

The only issue raised on appeal is whether trial counsel was ineffective for

failing to conduct any testing or examination of the alleged controlled substance. We

conclude that this claim would be more appropriately addressed in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255

proceeding, in which a record can be fully developed. See United States v. Mitchell,

136 F.3d 1192, 1193 (8th Cir. 1998).

Upon review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-390-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 3, 2001.

    Take notice that on April 30, 2001, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume NO. 1, the following tariff sheet to 
become effective May 1, 2001:

Thirty Fifth Revised Sheet No. 9

    National states that under Article II, Section 2, of the 
settlement, it is required to recalculate the maximum Interruptible 
Gathering (IG) rate monthly and to charge that rate on the first day of 
the following month if the result is an IG rate more than 2 cents above 
or below the IG rate as calculated under Section 1 of Article II. The 
recalculation produced an IG rate of $1.34 per dth. In addition, 
Article III, Section 1 states that any overruns of the Firm Gathering 
service provided by National shall be priced at the maximum IG rate.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11650 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 18 – Landsat’s International Partners      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn about the network of international cooperators who aid the Landsat mission.

 

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

Download and Transcript Access

**Summary**: Across the planet, in rural settings on uncluttered landscapes, there are satellite antennas receiving data directly from Landsat satellites as they pass 438 miles overhead at more than 17,000 miles per hour. It happens multiple times a day, in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Germany, South Korea, and elsewhere. The International Cooperators network has 20 ground stations in 14 countries. In this episode, we hear from three of our international partners on the value satellite data brings to their countries.

**Guests**: Vincent Rooke, Geosciences Australia; Chung Hum Yu, National Disaster Management Research Institute of South Korea; Dr. Paida Mangara, School for Geography, Archeology and Environmental Studies, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: Brian Hauge

**Release date**: March 9, 2020

**More on International Cooperators**: 
                            - International Cooperators Find Value, Collaboration in Joining Landsat Network
                            - Indigenous Artwork Celebrates USGS, Geoscience Australia Landsat Partnership
                            - International Cooperators Honored with Permanent EROS Lobby Display

### Contacts
DOCSNY-271816v01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

EMERITA E LARA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

ALAN KASMAN D/B/A KASCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05365-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 October 3, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05365-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Clear All

        28 October 2022    

                    USS Gerald R. Ford arrives in Halifax for First International Port Visit                 
                HALIFAX, Nova Scotia - The first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) and embarked crew arrived in Halifax, Nova Scotia, for the ship’s first international port visit, Oct. 28, 2022.            

        19 May 2022    

                    Canadian Delegation Visits Naval Oceanography                  
                STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss.—— Military and government representatives from Canada’s Naval Geospatial Intelligence Maritime and Directorate of Meteorology and Oceanography (DMETOC) toured Naval Oceanography HQ and subordinate commands at NASA Stennis Space Center for an overview of mission goals,            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2000 and the consolidated statement of
income for the six months ended June 30, 2000 of Summit Brokerage Services, Inc.
and Subsidiaries and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         306,520
<SECURITIES>                                    14,825
<RECEIVABLES>                                  890,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                    31,040
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,087,992
<PP&E>                                         230,743
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,387,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          691,462
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           455
<OTHER-SE>                                     655,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,387,865
<SALES>                                      4,370,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,401,432
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,368,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,225
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.007
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.007


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
                               XTRA CORPORATION
           STATEMENT OF THE CALCULATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                 FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
                             (Millions of dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             1999      1998      1997
                                                            ------    ------    ------
<S>                                                         <C>       <C>       <C>
EARNINGS
Income from operations before provision for income taxes    $   58    $   99    $   71
  Add:  Fixed charges (below)                                   58        58        63
                                                            ------    ------    ------

                                                            $  116    $  157    $  134
                                                            ======    ======    ======

FIXED CHARGES                                               $   58    $   58    $   63
                                                            ======    ======    ======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                             2.0       2.7       2.1
                                                            ======    ======    ======
</TABLE>

Note:     For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
          earnings represent income from operations before taxes plus fixed
          charges. Fixed charges for operations consist of interest on
          indebtedness and the portion of rental expense which represents
          interest.

          Exclusive of the $39 million of one-time charges recorded in fiscal
          1999, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have been 2.7.

                                                                              74
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4787

_____________________________ A

VA E LECTRIS C ANNIE a ka Eva Helene Cannie
, Appellant,

v.

J ACKSONVILLE G OLF AND C OUNTRY C LUB H OMEOWNERS A SSOCIATION , M ARSH L ANDING M ANAGEMENT C O

. and C OUNTRY C LUB C ONCIERGE M AGAZINE , I NC

. , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Virginia Norton , Judge

. January 7, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
M AKAR , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concu r

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ava Electris Cannie, pro se
, Appellant.

No appearance fo r Appellee s

.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration 
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain 
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is 
described below including the party seeking relief, the regulatory 
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the 
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

Long Island Rail Road

[Docket Number FRA-2000-8588]

    Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) seeks a waiver of compliance with the 
Safety Appliance Safety Standards, 49 CFR part 231.14, which requires 
that sill steps be mounted utilizing mechanical fasteners. They request 
that the waiver be granted for one hundred twenty-one bi-level 
passenger coaches and twenty-three bi-level control car locomotives 
manufactured by Kawasaki. The waiver, if granted, would allow sill 
steps located at the four corners and two located on each side of the 
equipment, at the side door locations, to be mechanical fastened to a 
bracket that is welded to a tubular side sill. The railroad states that 
the equipment is a center sill-less design and is supported by two 
tubular side sills and to mechanically fasten the step to the car would 
require drilling the sill which would weaken it.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2000-8588) and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central 
Docket Management Facility, Room Pl-401, Washington, DC 20590-0001. 
Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice will 
be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments received 
after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All written 
communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above 
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for 
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web 
site at 
http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 27, 2001.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 01-11084 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6724

CLIFTON POLK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner; COLIE L. RUSHTON,

Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-2830-6)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clifton Polk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions

to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time

to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on November 12, 1996;

Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on May 16, 1997, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst  Acquisitions III, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Scott
Mac Caughern,  the Principal Executive,  Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Mac Caughern
----------------------
Principal Executive, Financial
and Accounting Officer
Date: July 25, 2008
#### Edward BRYAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn C. MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-8106.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 28, 2013.

Edward Sabari Bryan, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*210PER CURIAM:

Edward Bryan appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A (b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Bryan v. Matthews,*No. 3:12-cv-02316-RBH, 2012 WL 5944927 (D.S.C. Nov. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 26 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 26 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 26 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 26 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 4 of 4