alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Clear All

        12 May 2023    

                    Future USS Augusta (LCS 34) Delivered to the Navy                 
                MOBILE, Ala. — The Navy accepted delivery of the future USS Augusta (LCS 34) at Austal USA in Mobile, Alabama, May 12. USS Augusta is the second ship named in honor of the city of Augusta, Maine.            

        03 February 2023    

                    Future USS Marinette (LCS 25) Delivered to Navy                 
                WASHINGTON — The Navy accepted delivery of the future USS Marinette (LCS 25) from Lockheed Martin this week at the Fincantieri Marinette Marine shipyard in Marinette, Wisconsin.“Today marks a significant milestone in the life of the future USS Marinette,” said Capt. Andy Gold, LCS program manager.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 20 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 20 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 20 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 20 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 20 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Clear All

        17 January 2023    

                    USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) visits Tallinn, Estonia                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) returned to the Baltic Sea, Jan. 17, 2023, after a scheduled port visit to Tallinn, Estonia.            

        14 December 2022    

                    USS Roosevelt, Leading the Way on Warfare Development                 
                MEDITERRANEAN SEA – Five Officers trained as Warfare Tactics Instructors currently serve aboard the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Roosevelt (DDG 80), demonstrating their continued commitment to elite tactical excellence and training onboard.            

        11 November 2022    

                    USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) celebrates Armistice Day in Toulon, France                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) arrived in Toulon, France for a scheduled port visit, Nov. 10, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the undersigned officer of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (the”Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

The Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year endedFebruary 29, 2008 (the “Form 10-KSB”) of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Exchange Act andthe information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.

 

 
| Date: June 13, 2008 | /s/ Sandra Pautsky                                                            |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |       Sandra Pautsky, President and                  |
|                |          Principal Executive  Officer |
|                |          of Oakridge Energy,  Inc.    |
|                |                                                                          |
|                |                                                                          |
| Date: June 13, 2008 | /s/ Sandra Pautsky                                                            |
|                |       Sandra Pautsky, Principal                      |
|                |          Financial Officer of         |
|                |          Oakridge Energy,  Inc.       |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to theForm 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accordingly, is not being filedas part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1
Five Year Selected Financial Data

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     Year ended September 30,
              (Millions of dollars except per       1999         1998         1997         1996        1995
                               share amounts)
                                                 ------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Operations

Revenues                                         $   464      $    461      $   435      $   422      $   378

Cash provided from operations                        277           293          269          272          237

Capital expenditures/(1)/                            265           199          249          210          699

Pretax income                                         58/(2)/       99/(3)/      71           69           98

Net income                                            35/(2)/       60/(3)/      43           41           57

Per Share Information

Basic earnings per share                         $  2.49/(2)/ $   3.90/(3)/ $  2.79      $  2.56      $  3.40

Diluted earnings per share                       $  2.49/(2)/ $   3.88/(3)/ $  2.78      $  2.56      $  3.39

Dividends declared per share                           -      $   0.64      $  0.78      $  0.70      $  0.62

Financial Position

Total assets                                     $ 1,573      $  1,575      $ 1,585      $ 1,537      $ 1,516

Total debt                                           852           802          892          892          898

Total stockholders' equity                           337           408          360          342          359
</TABLE>

/(1)/ Includes equipment leased in under operating leases and capital
      expenditures for acquisitions.

/(2)/ Includes one-time pretax charges of $13 million for restructuring, a $25
      million equipment write-down, and a $1 million unusual item for expenses
      related to the terminated merger. Without these one-time charges, fiscal
      1999 Basic and Diluted earnings per share would have been $4.16.

/(3)/ Includes a $1 million pretax unusual item for expenses related to the
      terminated merger. Without this unusual item, fiscal 1998 Basic and
      Diluted earnings per share would have been $3.93 and $3.91, respectively.

                                                                              76
#### DAYTON v. KINGS COUNTY EL. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

February 12, 1894.)

Action by Alethia Dayton against the Kings County Elevated Railroad Company.

No opinion. Affirmed by default.
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 63 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-61592) and Amendment No. 531 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The
      Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for
      the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

                 /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 20, 2019
(86 South. 70)

#### LIEPOLD BROS. v. ULLMAN.

(2 Div. 713.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 24, 1920.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; B. M. Miller, Judge. ■

Proceeding between Liepold Bros, and Helen Y. Ullman. Prom the judgment, the former appeal.

Affirmed.

George H. Craig, of Selma, J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Lawrence E. Brown and Henry P. AVhite, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

Hugh Mallory, of Selma, R. B. Evins, of Greensboro, and Ray Rushton, J. J. Mayfield, and H. F. Crenshaw, all of Montgomery, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on the authority of Eliasberg Bros. Mercantile Co. v. W. C. Grimes, ante, p. 492, 86 South. 56.
#### McARTHUR, Appellant, v. CAMERON et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by Wallace R. McArthur against Lydia A. Cameron and others.

No opinion. Order appealed from affirmed, with 810 costs and disbursements.
Clear All

        08 November 2022    

                    Families Join USS Wyoming Crew; Experience Life Aboard Ballistic-Missile Submarine                 
                KINGS BAY, Ga. - The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming Blue Crew (SSBN 742) temporarily gained 39 crew members, when family and friends embarked aboard the submarine for a tiger cruise, Oct. 21.            

        24 March 2022    

                    USS Wyoming women make history during ballistic-missile submarine patrol                 
                KINGS BAY, Ga. - It has been more than 12 years since women were authorized to serve aboard submarines. While women comprise nearly one-fourth of the Department of Defense’s total force, only a small fraction of women serve on submarines.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

OSCAR BERMUDEZ,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 455 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
[Exhibit 32.1]

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31st 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),
I, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

May 15th, 2007

/s/ Paul B. Kravitz
---------------------------
Paul B. Kravitz,
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7212

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MILES THOMAS CLARKE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-89-136-N, CA-95-673-2)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 29, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Miles Thomas Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Clarke, Nos. CR-89-136-N;

CA-95-673-2 (E.D. Va. July 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief
Executive Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ David G. Derrick
                                         --------------------
                                         David G. Derrick
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         RemoteMDx, Inc.


                                         /s/Michael G. Acton
                                         -------------------
                                         Michael G. Acton
                                         Chief Financial Officer



Dated: June 15, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3537] 

# DEPARTMENT:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Vincent van Gogh and the Painters of the Petit Boulevard” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Saint Louis Art Museum, Saint Louis, MO, from on or about February 17, 2001, through on or about May 13, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001. 

Dated: January 5, 2001.

William B. Bader,

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 01-1085 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-31110

Conference Calendar

 

CLARENCE SAMUELS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LONNIE HAY; RAY HANSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:04-CV-1100-SMH 

--------------------

Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clarence Samuels, Louisiana prisoner # 133005, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B). If his appellate brief is afforded liberal

construction, Samuels contends that the district court abused its

discretion in dismissing his claims as frivolous. First, Samuels 

challenges the determination that his lost property claim was not

cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For purposes of his claim
No. 04-31110

-2-

that prison guards interfered with his attempts to obtain relief

through the state administrative grievance process, Samuels

raises an exhaustion argument, contending that the actions of the

prison guards delayed his ability to pursue federal relief. 

Finally, Samuels argues, for the first time, that the prison

guards acted with retaliatory intent. New allegations may not be

raised and will not be addressed for the first time on appeal. 

Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir.

1999). Accordingly, we decline consideration of Samuels’s

retaliation argument.

As determined by the district court, Samuels’s argument

concerning the confiscation of his radio headphones fails because

Louisiana provides a post-deprivation remedy for property loss. 

See Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 541-44 (1981); Hudson v.

Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984); LA. CIV. CODE ANN. art 2315 (West

1997). Similarly, Samuels fails to show that the district court

abused its discretion when rejecting his allegations of denied

access to the state administrative grievance procedure. See

Newsome v. EEOC, 301 F.3d 227, 231 (5th Cir. 2002).

Samuels’s appeal is without arguable merit and is dismissed

as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; see also Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Samuels is cautioned that

the district court’s dismissal of his complaint and this court’s

dismissal of his appeal count as two strikes under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th
No. 04-31110

-3-

Cir. 1996). Samuels is further cautioned that if he accumulates

three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he may not proceed in

forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Joan Gottlieb Mendell v. Laurence Scott and Rachel Chaput

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00471

- CV

Trial court case number: 475348

Trial court: Probate Court No 1 of Harris County

On October 8, 2020, appellant Joan Gottlieb Mendell filed an emergency motion for

temporary relief, seeking a stay of the October 19, 2020 trial setting in the underlying case until

such time as the appeals pending before this Court in the above

- styled case and in Case No. 01

- 20

-

00578

- CV are finally decided. Appellant’s emergency motion for temporary relief is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Adams

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 13, 2020