alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        23 August 2023    

                    Navy Expeditionary Combat Forces enable distributed maritime operations during LSE 2023                 
                Sailors and Marines assigned to Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) refined their warfighting concepts and tactics in live, virtual, and constructive training events throughout the month of August during Large Scale Exercise (LSE) 2023. NECC’s operations center provided command and            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6050

KAYIE SHAUNE WRIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHNNY HAWKINS; BILLY O. COOPER; ELDRIDGE WALKER; 

APPLEWHITE; GILLIO; TILLEY; WILSON; JANE DOE, Psychiatrist, Polk 

Correctional Institution; SERGEANT WILSON; MR. FAULCON; ALFREDA 

THREAT; JOHN DOE, Maintenance Worker; KIERAH BANKS WILLIAMS; D. 

CHAMBLISS; OFFICER CARMON; OFFICER PEARSALL; OFFICER 

CLERENA; OFFICER GREENE; OFFICER SWEET; OFFICER GARDNER;

CHARLES JOHNSON; CASE WORKER JONES; PSYCHIATRIST FIELDS; 

JANE DOE, Psychiatrist, Central Prison,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03137-BO)

Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 25, 2021

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kayie Shaune Wright, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kayie Shaune Wright appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action 

without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Wright v. Hawkins, No. 5:20-ct-03137-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2020). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 34 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 34 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH Document 22 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH Document 22 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 6

- 00 026

- C V



### ____________________

ROSEMARIE JOYAL

, Appellant

V.

ISAAC SHAREEF , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 14

- 12

- 13747

- CV

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court signed a final decree of divorce on December 15, 2015.

Rosemarie Joyal filed a notice of appeal. The brief of the appellant was due to be

filed on or before July 20, 2016, but Joyal did not file a brief. On July 21, 2016 , we

notified the parties that the brief had not been filed a nd warn ed the appellant that

her failure to file a brief could result in a dismissal of the appeal for want of

prosecution

. On August 12 , 201 6 , we notified the parties that the appeal would be2 submitted to the Court without briefs and without oral argument. See T ex. R. App.

P. 39.8.

In the absence of a brief assigning error for appellate review, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISS ED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on September 2, 2016

Opinion Delivered September 22, 2016

Before McKeithen, C.J. , Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Clear All

        09 January 2023    

                    Naval Enterprise can Expect Risk Management Assessments                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - Naval enterprise commands can now expect assessments of their risk management and self-improvement practices by Naval Safety Command (NAVSAFECOM) assurance teams.            

        18 November 2022    

                    Don't Be a Turkey When Hitting the Roads                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - It’s that time of year when many begin imagining the smells of delicious pumpkin pie, turkey and stuffing. Some have already started thoughtful prep work in anticipation of preparing the perfect meal for their loved ones this Thanksgiving. As we look ahead to the upcoming            

        10 August 2022    

                    Naval Safety Command's mission, functions, tasks updated                 
                NAVSAFECOM now has the authority to direct commands to take corrective action against identified unsafe practices and, when necessary, suspend specific activities until corrective actions are completed and risks are mitigated.            

        06 May 2022    

                    Naval Safety Command Launches Annual '101 Critical Days of Summer' Safety Campaign                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - Summer is right around the corner and it is time for the Naval Safety Command (NAVSAFECOM) annual “101 Critical Days of Summer” safety campaign. Summer is the longest vacation period of the year, and mishaps, as well as associated fatalities, have historically spiked during this time.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           4,144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                        39
<INVENTORY>                                     17,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,740
<PP&E>                                          39,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,469
<BONDS>                                          4,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,692
<SALES>                                         94,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,802
<CGS>                                           64,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (89)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,334)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,869
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4910

GORDON KING,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News.

Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge;

James E. Bradberry, Magistrate Judge.

(CR-01-89, MISC-01-155)

Submitted: May 16, 2002

Decided: June 7, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Stephen A. Hudgins, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J.

McNulty, United States Attorney, Gary M. Parker, Special Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Gordon King appeals his conviction and five month sentence for

driving under the influence of alcohol in a third or subsequent

offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 13 (1994), assimilating Va. Code

Ann. § 18.2-266 (Michie 1998), and unlawfully refusing to submit to

a breathalyzer test, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3118 (1994). 

King raises two issues on appeal. First, King argues the evidence

was insufficient to sustain his convictions. A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is reviewed to determine whether, viewing the

evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, substantial

evidence exists to support a verdict. Glasser v. United States, 315

U.S. 60, 80 (1942). The testimony of the Government’s witness,

viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, was sufficient

to sustain King’s convictions. United States v. Beidler, 110 F.3d

1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1997). 

Second, King argues the stop of his vehicle violated the Fourth

Amendment. King has waived review of this claim by his failure to

bring this challenge in district court. United States v. Ricco, 52 F.3d

58, 62 (4th Cir. 1995). 

Accordingly, we affirm King’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not significantly aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. KING
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM E. SANDERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1895

[November 23, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 from the Circuit Court for the 

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge;

L.T. Case No. 432020CF0000541A.

William E. Sanders, Bonifay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

FORST, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel NCCAM SEP C-11.
    Date: May 23-25, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriott, 805 Russell Avenue, Gaithersburg, 
MD 20879.
    Contact Person: John C. Chah, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Center for Complementary and Alternative 
Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Rm. 106, Bethesda, MD 20892-5495, 301-402-4334, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec8f848d8486ac818d8580c2828584c28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abc8c3cac3c1ebc6cac2c785c5c2c385ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 30, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-11393 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 43 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 31 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 31 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 31 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief
Executive Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


         /s/ David G. Derrick
       --------------------------------------------
       David G. Derrick
       President and Chief Executive Officer
       Medizone International, Inc.

        /s/ Michael G. Acton
       ----------------------------------------------
       Michael G. Acton
       Chief Financial Officer



Dated: October 30, 2003
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 18 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of James J. Sansone, as Aggrieved Candi*520date, Appellant, v Gerald D. Watson, as Candidate for the Nomination of the Republican, Democratic, Liberal and Conservative Parties for the Office of City Court Judge of the City of Lockport, et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Doyle, J.—Election Law.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Den-man, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1987.)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1627 

To direct the Attorney General to submit to Congress investigative materials 

in the event of certain pardons granted by the President, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. PALLONE, Miss RICE of New 

York, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. COHEN, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. 

WATSON COLEMAN, Mrs. TORRES of California, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. KILMER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. WELCH, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. 

WATERS, Mr. RUSH, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. 

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. ROUDA, 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. 

PANETTA, and Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General to submit to Congress investigative materials in the event of certain pardons granted 

by the President, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abuse of the Pardon 

5 Prevention Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1627 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT RELATING TO CER2 TAIN PARDONS. 

3 (a) SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION.—In the event 

4 that the President grants an individual a pardon for an 

5 offense against the United States that arises from an in6 vestigation in which the President, or a relative of the 

7 President, is a target, subject, or witness, not later than 

8 30 days after the date of such pardon, the Attorney Gen9 eral shall submit to the chairmen and ranking members 

10 of the appropriate congressional committees all materials 

11 of an investigation that were obtained by a United States 

12 Attorney, another Federal prosecutor, or an investigative 

13 authority of the Federal Government, relating to the of14 fense for which the individual is so pardoned. 

15 (b) TREATMENT OF INFORMATION.—Rule 6(e) of the 

16 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure may not be con17 strued to prohibit the disclosure of information required 

18 by subsection (a) of this section. 

19 (c) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply with 

20 respect to a pardon granted by the President on or after 

21 January 20, 2017. 

22 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

23 (1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com24 mittees’’ means— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1627 IH

1 (A) the Committee on the Judiciary of the 

2 House of Representatives and the Committee 

3 on the Judiciary of the Senate; and 

4 (B) if an investigation relates to intel5 ligence or counterintelligence matters, the Per6 manent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

7 House of Representatives and the Select Com8 mittee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

9 (2) The term ‘‘pardon’’ includes a commutation 

10 of sentence. 

11 (3) The term ‘‘relative’’ has the meaning given 

12 that term in section 3110(a) of title 5, United 

13 States Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
DAN A. DRUZ (DD-6177) 

291 E. Main St. 

Suite 1000 

Manasquan, NJ 08736 

732 223-7676 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Pristine Capital Holdings, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

 

PRISTINE CAPITAL HOLDINGS 

INC., 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

 

VELEZ CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, 

LLC, OLIVER VELEZ, PAUL 

LANGE, SAUL ORTIZ-STEVENS, 

AND STEPHEN CINA, 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 07-5720 

Hon. William H. Pauley III 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i), Plaintiff in the 

above-captioned matter, ABC Corp., hereby voluntarily DISMISSES this action WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. 

s/ Dan A. Druz

Dan A. Druz 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: June 29, 2007 

Case 1:07-cv-05720-WHP Document 4 Filed 06/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
Order filed, May 25, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00275-CV

____________

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant

V.

THE HONORABLE MIKE PARROTT, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1072783

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 09, 2016. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Laura Cutherell, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit23.4**

 

 

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

Miller and Lents, Ltd. hereby consents to theuse of its name and the information from its reports regarding its estimates ofreserves and future net revenues from the production and sale of those reservesfor the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 in Pogo ProducingCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,including the filing of its letter reports as exhibits thereto, and to theincorporation by reference thereof into Pogo Producing Company’s previouslyfiled Registration Statement Nos. 33-54969, 333-04233, 333-75105, 333-75105-01,333-75105-02, 333-74861, 333-42426,333-42428, 333-60800, 333-67324, 333-65548, 333-86856, 333-98205, 333-102775,333-115130, 333-86417, 333-126097, and333-130557.

 

 
|   | Miller and Lents, Ltd. |
|--------|------------------------|
|   |                   |
|   |                   |
|   | By:                    | /s/Carl D. Richard |   | [SEAL] |
|   |                   |  Carl D. Richard |
|   |                   |  Senior Vice President |

 

 

Houston, Texas

March 1, 2006

 

----