alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION****COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES****(Unaudited)**    **Year Ended May 31,**   **2002**  **2001**  **2000**  **1999**  **1998**   **(In millions, except ratios)**Earnings:                    Income before income taxes  $703  $786  $843  $771  $735Add back:                    Interest expense, net of capitalized interest   74   75   82   91   118Amortization of debt issuance costs   1   1   1   9   1Portion of rent expense representative of interest factor   594   563   575   535   500           Earnings as adjusted  $1,372  $1,425  $1,501  $1,406  $1,354           Fixed charges:                    Interest expense, net of capitalized interest  $74  $75  $82  $91  $118Capitalized interest   23   23   30   35   31Amortization of debt issuance costs   1   1   1   9   1Portion of rent expense representative of interest factor   594   563   575   535   500              $692  $662  $688  $670  $650           Ratio of earnings to fixed charges   2.0   2.2   2.2   2.1   2.1
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 29-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 29-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 39 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 39 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 39 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
| |  | Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLPPO Box 82
Royal Trust Tower, Suite 3000
Toronto Dominion Centre
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5K 1G8
Telephone +1 416 863 1133
Facsimile +1 416 365 8215
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Geac Computer Corporation Limited of our report dated June 28, 2004 relating to
the consolidated financial statements of Geac Computer Corporation Limited, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders.

| |  | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------

Toronto, Canada
June 28, 2004

---



QuickLinks
Case 1:07-cv-04177-AKH Document 4 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04177-AKH Document 4 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 796 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 796

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the authority of 
  the Secretary of the Treasury to enter into private debt collection 
                               contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2009

 Mr. Lewis of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Stark, Mr. Levin, 
Mr. McDermott, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Kind, Mr. Pascrell, Ms. 
    Berkley, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Meek of Florida, Ms. 
     Schwartz, Mr. Davis of Illinois, and Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the authority of 
  the Secretary of the Treasury to enter into private debt collection 
                               contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO PRIVATE DEBT COLLECTION 
              CONTRACTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter A of chapter 64 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking section 6306.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subchapter B of chapter 76 of such Code is amended by 
        striking section 7433A.
            (2) Section 7811 of such Code is amended by striking 
        subsection (g).
            (3) Section 1203 of the Internal Revenue Service 
        Restructuring Act of 1998 is amended by striking subsection 
        (e).
            (4) The table of sections for subchapter A of chapter 64 of 
        such Code is amended by striking the item relating to section 
        6306.
            (5) The table of sections for subchapter B of chapter 76 of 
        such Code is amended by striking the item relating to section 
        7433A.
    (c) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall 
        take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Unauthorized contracts treated as void.--Any qualified 
        tax collection contract (as defined in section 6306 of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as in effect before its repeal) 
        shall be void.
                                 <all>
```
2 Tt & 18

ae |
, 2005
RETARIAT

BY EMAIL AND FACSIMILE OFC. OF bee
Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 05.142: Notification of
Change to the Methodology for Calculating the NYMEX Brent Crude
Oil Index used for Final Settlement of the NYMEX Brent Crude Oil
Futures Contract as Referenced under Rule 205.04.

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of a change in the
methodology for calculating the NYMEX Brent Crude Oil Index, as referenced in Rule 205.04,
used for the final settlement price for the NYMEX Brent Crude Oil Futures Contract on
termination day. The Brent Crude Oil Index will be based on cash market information collected
on termination day, and will utilize only cargo cash deals (not partial cargo deals) and price
indications compiled by three price reporting services (Argus, ICIS-LOR, and Reuters). The
attached explanation summarizes the calculation methodology for the Brent Crude Oil Index, and
this explanation will also be posted on the NYMEX website.

Pursuant to Section Sc(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6,
the Exchange hereby certifies that the change to the methodology for the NYMEX Brent Crude
Oil Index complies with the Act, including regulations under the Act. These changes to the
NYMEX Brent Crude Oil Index will commence with the contract termination of the September
2005 contract month, starting on August 16, 2005.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Dan Brusstar,
Director, Research, at (212) 299-2604; or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2390.

Very truly yours,
Robert A. Levin
Senior Vice President, Research

Attachments: Explanation of NYMEX Brent Crude Oil Index


Explanation of Final Settlement Procedure
The NYMEX Brent Crude Oil Index used for final settlement of the NYMEX Brent Crude Oil

Contract will be based on cash market information collected by Argus Media, ICIS-LOR, and
Reuters during the regular trading hours on termination day from 10:00 AM to 7:30 PM,
London/Dublin time. The Exchange will utilize only cargo cash deals done and price
indications, and will average the following three components:

¢ Weighted Average of front-month 21-day Brent-Forties-Oseberg (BFO) cash market
transactions: prices on market transactions for BFO cargoes for the front-month, the
same contract-month which is terminating trading in the futures market.

¢ Implied front-month price based on spread trading between the first and second months
forward: an implied weighted average front-month price based on cash BFO cargo
transactions for the second-month forward and spreads between the front-month and
second-month cash BFO cargo deals.

¢ Price indications of front-month cash BFO: periodic price assessments of front-month
prices for 21-day cash BFO based on the transaction information and best bids and offers
in the marketplace.
<PAGE>   1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
2-82662, 2-85336, 2-94926, 33-12280, 33-16088, 33-28764, 33-45474, 33-63289,
33-64039, 33-70960, 333-14529, 333-03139, 333-26149, 333-44495, and 333-53175
each on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-62715, 333-05971, 333-20209,
333-44493 and 333-59005 each on Form S-3 of our report dated December 27, 1999,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston Massachusetts
December 29, 1999
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, R. Ray Bell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tidelands Royalty Trust “B”; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s Trustee and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s Trustee and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: March 30, 2006 /s/ R. RAY BELL         R. Ray Bell    Principal Accounting Officer  
26
### The Honorab le Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-3841

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Sylvester Bray, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 7, 1996 Filed: May 15, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sylvester Bray pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Th e district court sentenced him to 75 months imprisonment and two year s 1 supervised release. He appeals, arguing only that his sentence was th e result of improper and unconstitutional "double-counting." We affirm. We do not believe Bray sufficiently alerted the district court to the issue he now raises. He made no objection to the pre-sentence report' s calcu lation of the guideline range, and in fact agreed that the repor t correctly applied the Guidelines. He argued

### -2-

at sentencing only that the Guidelines themselves were unconstitutiona l becau se ". . . they are structured in a way that they could cause blac k defendants to receive higher sentences than white defendants." (Sent. Tr. , at 3.) His objection was overruled. See United States v. Williams , 994 F.2d 1287, 1294 (8th Cir. 1993) (to preserve issue for appeal, defendant must timely object and clearly state grounds for objection so that trial court has opportunity to prevent or correct error).

In an y event, Bray's "double-counting" argument is without merit , because the district court's consideration of hi s prior felony convictions in computing both his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2) and his criminal history category under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1 was proper an d constitutional. Cf. United States v. Saffeels , 39 F.3d 833, 836-37 (8th Cir. 1994) (holding "triple-counting" permissibl e, where defendant's prior felonies were used to convict him as felon-in-possession under § 922(g), enhance his sentence under § 924(e)(1), and dete rmine his criminal history category under § 4A1.1); United States v. Thomas , 930 F.2d 12, 14 (8th Cir
. 199 1) (rejecting due process and double jeopardy challenges to § 4A1.1 , where defendant was convicted of escape and crim inal history was increased because defendant was under criminal sentence when he escaped). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
! ; , :; , ,-. - 7.. 5, TT, 

, ! 5 -= :I-?.,, 3 L, . Y B , . cooley . - - . I' i : !1 !yy-.+,'~ ;,-y , 2 , r.;j,':":-. ,%. I TI. , 3;bL;:r.<'l' -'!,r~.",.+-y TT.7 1 1 

i i , . 1 t 

GDDWARD KRDNISH LLP , . . L., .. , .,L,~p

.,.> FiLEP i . . ,\I+( '; i;: "Lua . . . .. 

.. . 1 i .. .' i" . ..,/ '1 . I: I---.---- ------ i ! -, , ; -; ..; j .g : *-.,: : >: I j . .:'. :*.. ; , .... ;,:: ... . + t- .. -,-, : ,- , - ,"., L..!.-~;Z:: - 2/161~& -,.,-- , 

DANIEL H. DAVIS &.. t, . , - ,.-....-,.--I.---,- ..,,.--- .,.,. ,. ... _. ... ..---..-..- --j . . ..4 .--,- ----..- ...-,.-.. " -,-,.--. -J 

T: (21 2) 479-6360 . . 

April 9, 2008 MEMO ENDORSED 

VIA HAND DELIVERY 

The Honorable Richard M. Berman 

Daniel Patrick Moynihan 

United States Courthouse 

500 Pearl Street, Room 650 

New York. New York 10007 

RE: Christopher Pape v. Electronic Arts, Inc. 

07-CV-5760 (RMB) 

Dear Judge Berman: 

We represent the defendant, Electronic Arts Inc. ("EA"), in the above-captioned matter. The 

parties were able to settle this dispute at a conference before Magistrate Judge Eaton on Monday, 

March 10, 2008. Judge Eaton entered a conditional Order of Discontinuance, instructing that this 

case could be restored to the Court's active calendar if a settlement was not reached within 30 days. 

Though EA sent plaintiffs counsel a final settlement agreement on March 19, 2008, plaintiff 

has not yet executed the document. We do not anticipate receipt of an executed settlement 

agreement from the plaintiff before the 30-day deadline expires on Thursday, April 10, 2008. 

However, we are informed by plaintiffs counsel that plaintiff will execute the settlement agreement in 

short order. We therefore request an extension of the previously entered 30-day Order of 

Discontinuance by an additional 30 days, to Friday, May 9, 2008, which will allow the parties to 

finally resolve this matter. 

Although the Order of Discontinuance advised that either party could request to reopen the 

matter by writing to Judge Eaton, in light of the Court's order of March 10, 2008 withdrawing the 

reference to Judge Eaton, we are making this request to your Honor. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Daniel H. Davis 

cc: The Honorable Douglas F. Eaton 

John W. Crittenden, Esq. 

Carl I. Kaminsky, Esq. 

SO 0 

---.I ---99-- 

RICHARD M,BERNAN U.S.D. J. 

11 14 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10036 T: (212) 479-6000 F: (212) 479-6275 WWW.COOLEY.COM 

Case 1:07-cv-05760-RMB Document 21 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned Trustee of Tidelands Royalty Trust B (the Trust), does
hereby certify, to such Trustees knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2012 (the Form 10-K) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|Ron E. Hooper Senior Vice
President Royalty Management on behalf of U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Tidelands Royalty Trust B

Dated: March 28, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tidelands Royalty Trust B and will be retained by Tidelands Royalty Trust B and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit
to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify
that the foregoing Quarterly Report of CLAIMSNET.COM INC. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report"):

         (1)      Fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Paul W. Miller
-----------------------
Paul W. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
April 1, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
WS COT 25 ANG 15

October 24, 2005 UFC.GF Tc

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581
Reference File #2588.02
Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following, which supplements CBOT’s previous filing on this subject dated October
18, 2005 (CBOT Reference File #2588.01):

- Establishment of an Electronic Market Maker (EMM) Program for CBOT Two
Year Treasury Note Options. (Summary of program’s salient features is attached).

There were no opposing views in connection with this program.

The CBOT intends to implement this program no sooner than one day after the Commission’s
receipt of this filing.

The CBOT certifies that this program complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

B081605


CBOT® Two Year US Treasury Note Futures Options
Electronic Market Maker (EMM) Program

EMM Obligations

Participants in the EMM program will provide two-sided markets in CBOT Two Year Treasury
Note Options on the CBOT’s electronic platform (e-cbot®), on a continuous basis and in
response to requests-for-quote (“RFQs”) during regular U. S. market hours (7:00 a.m. to 2:00
p-m., Chicago time) for such options, unless prevented from doing so as a result of extraordinary
circumstances beyond the EMM’s reasonable control.

Market Maker Classes: There are two classes of EMM participants, the Primary Market Maker
Group (PMM), and the Competitive Market Maker Group (CMM).

EMM participants agree that they will respond to RFQs for CBOT Two Year Treasury Note
Options at agreed upon minimum size and maximum bid/offer spread levels for specified options
series,

Market Maker Incentive
Both PMMs and CMMs will be entitled to the following incentive:

Waiver of transaction fees: All CBOT electronic transaction fees will be rebated for EMM
proprietary transactions in CBOT Two Year Treasury Note Options during the market hours of
their assignment. The fee waiver period will coincide with each EMM’s period of participation
in this program.

Further Incentive Available for PMMs

Preferencing/Entitlements: After the allocation of any priority order, PMMs will be entitled to a
percentage of each transaction in CBOT Two Year Treasury Note Options, in a percentage to be
determined, where PMMs have matched the bid or offer prior to trade completion, during the
hours of their assignment. Total preferencing to all PMMs will be limited to 40%. Preferencing
will be allocated among PMMs based upon the number of participants, their respective market
making commitments, capitalization and market performance. CBOT will evaluate participant
performance on a quarterly basis, and reserves the right to reallocate entitlement percentages
among PMMs based upon these evaluations.

Term
The program will have a maximum initial term of two years.
Termination

EMM Agreements may be terminated for uncorrected material breach, upon specified advance
notice, or by mutual consent.
No. 694.

#### Hugh R. Healy, Petitioner, *v.*The Sun Company, Owner, etc.

February 1, 1909.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. *William J. Wallace*and Mr. *Frederick M. Brown*for petitioner. Mr. *J. Parker Kirlin*and Mr. *Charles ñ. Hickóx*for respondent.