alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Eastern Ecological Science Center 
-  Science 

#           Freshwater Mussel Physiology      

  Completed

      By Eastern Ecological Science Center      February 28, 2018    

            -              Overview           

Freshwater mussels are considered ecosystems engineers benefiting the streams and rivers they inhabit through filtration, biodeposition, and nutrient cycling, thereby influencing water quality.  However, many of these species are rapidly declining due to shifting environmental conditions and habitat loss.  Researchers at Leetown Science Center are evaluating how different species of mussels respond both physiologically and behaviorally to a variety of key environmental stressors (e.g. drought, temperature, stream flow).  By measuring endpoints such as upper thermal tolerance, metabolic rate, feeding rate, and borrowing behavior we aim to understand what environmental conditions provide suitable and “optimal” conditions for maintaining healthy freshwater mussel populations, what conditions are harmful to these organisms, and these conditions differ among species. 

 

View Media Details

### Contacts

####             Heather Galbraith (Former Employee)          

##### Research Fish Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

### Explore Search

                      - Fish and Aquatic Species Conservation
                      - Biology
                      - Ecosystems

View All **

Freshwater mussels are considered ecosystems engineers benefiting the streams and rivers they inhabit through filtration, biodeposition, and nutrient cycling, thereby influencing water quality.  However, many of these species are rapidly declining due to shifting environmental conditions and habitat loss.  Researchers at Leetown Science Center are evaluating how different species of mussels respond both physiologically and behaviorally to a variety of key environmental stressors (e.g. drought, temperature, stream flow).  By measuring endpoints such as upper thermal tolerance, metabolic rate, feeding rate, and borrowing behavior we aim to understand what environmental conditions provide suitable and “optimal” conditions for maintaining healthy freshwater mussel populations, what conditions are harmful to these organisms, and these conditions differ among species. 

 

View Media Details

### Contacts

####             Heather Galbraith (Former Employee)          

##### Research Fish Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

### Explore Search

                      - Fish and Aquatic Species Conservation
                      - Biology
                      - Ecosystems

View All **
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8073

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RICHARD RAYORDO HARRIS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:04-cr-00387-RDB-1) 

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Richard Rayordo Harris, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Richard Rayordo Harris appeals the district court’s 

orders denying his motion for reconsideration of the order 

granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. 

Harris, No. 1:04-cr-00387-RDB-1 (D. Md. filed Sept. 15, 2008 & 

entered Sept. 16, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 

247 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,257,909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  159,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,421,224
<PP&E>                                               2
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,421,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,617,253
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     803,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,421,226
<SALES>                                      1,262,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,340,737
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,250,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,234,986
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,234,986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 53 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 24 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 24 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 24 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 15

R&B Falcon Corporation


     We are aware that R&B Falcon Corporation has incorporated by reference
in  its  Registration Statement No. 333-43475 its Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended  March  31,  1998, which includes our report  dated  April  28,  1998
covering  the  unaudited interim financial information  contained  therein.
Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is  not
considered  a  part of the registration statement prepared or certified  by
our  firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the  meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




/s/Arthur Andersen LLP

Houston, Texas
May 15, 1998
Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/17/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05305-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEBRUARY 5, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-12305

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-80011-CR-DTKH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SEAN L. BRAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(February 5, 2007)

Before BLACK, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Sean L. Bray appeals his convictions for possession of a firearm and

ammunition as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and

possession of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a). He asserts the district

court abused its discretion by: (1) excluding evidence of a pending internal affairs

investigation regarding two of the Government’s police witnesses; (2) excluding

evidence of prior conduct and a conviction of a non-witness third party who was

allegedly with Bray when he was stopped by police; (3) admitting evidence of

Bray’s tattoo at trial; and (4) admitting evidence of a prior incident when Bray was

stopped by police. Bray also appeals his sentence, contending the district court

erred by applying a sentencing enhancement for Bray’s prior convictions which

were not included in the indictment or part of the jury’s verdict.

We review a district court’s evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion. 

United States v. Tokars, 95 F.3d 1520, 1530 (11th Cir. 1996). We review

preserved constitutional sentencing challenges de novo and reverse only if the

error was harmful. United States v. Paz, 405 F.3d 946, 948 (11th Cir. 2005).

After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record, we have determined

the district court did not abuse its discretion with regard to the first four issues. 

Bray’s sentencing contention is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s opinion in
3

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 118 S. Ct. 1219 (1998). Thus, we affirm

Bray’s convictions and sentence.

AFFIRMED.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Paul Gonzalez, Jr., * From the 118th District Court

of Martin County,

Trial Court No. 1763.

Vs. No. 11-22-00117-CR * June 13, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 28-2 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-80001, 333-39006, 333-86342-16 and Form S-4 No.
333-116772-06) of Federal Express Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of
our reports dated June 22, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Federal Express Corporation included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May 31, 2004.




                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Memphis, Tennessee
July 16, 2004
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF THE


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Daniel
L. Coury, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Live Deal, Inc.





Date:
      February 14, 2008
            /s/
      Daniel L. Coury, Sr.Daniel
      L. Coury, Sr.Chief
      Executive Officer






I, Gary
L. Perschbacher, the Chief Financial Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Live Deal, Inc.





Date:
      February 14, 2008
            /s/  Gary L.
      PerschbacherGary
      L. PerschbacherChief
      Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00104-CR

Edward Lamoyne King, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 10-1235-K26, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant Edward Lamoyne King guilty of aggravated assault with

a deadly weapon. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02(a)(2) (West 2011). After finding that

appellant had at least two previous felony convictions, the jury assessed punishment at thirty-five

years’ imprisonment. See id. § 12.42(d) (West 2011) (enhancing punishment to life or no less than

twenty-five years’ imprisonment for felony conviction where defendant has previously been

convicted of two sequential felonies).

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by

a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements

of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

86–87 (1988).

Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine

the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d

at 766. We have not received a pro se brief from appellant.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate

counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d

at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel

that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Affirmed

Filed: March 6, 2013

Do Not Publish

2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

134871 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices SC: 134871

v COA: 265064 Montcalm CC: 04-001213-FC

AARON WAYNE CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Unilever PLC, a corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2014as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Dated: 6 March 2015                      
|                                         
|/s/ Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman
|Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman    
|Chief Executive Officer                  
|                                         
|Dated: 6 March 2015                      
|                                         
|/s/ Raoul Jean-Marc Sidney Huet          
|Raoul Jean-Marc Sidney Huet              
|Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I,Joseph D. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                       of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph D. Moore                             Joseph D. MooreExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerNovember 9, 2006
<PAGE>   1





                          CORPORATE ORGANIZATION CHART


As of December 31, 1998, the organization chart of corporate structure and
ownership is shown below. Percent figures show percent ownership of shares by
parent. Jurisdiction of organization is shown in parentheses.



McM CORPORATION (NC)   56-1171691

 - - 100% - - Equity Holdings, Inc. (DE)  56-1651565

 - - 100% - - Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North
                Carolina (NC)  84-0513811

          - - 100% - - Wilshire Insurance Company (NC)  56-1507441




Note: Two entities, Equity American Financial Service, Inc. and
Equity American General Agency, Inc., have been formed as North
Carolina corporations.  Although neither company has been fully
activated or capitalized, it is anticipated that they might be
utilized in additional marketing programs in the future.



                                      80
[Exhibit 32.1]

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.





                                        /s/ Paul B. Kravitz
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Paul B. Kravitz,
                                        Principal Executive Officer


July 15, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 48-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 43 of 43