J-S03034-20

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JESSIE JAMES HOLLEY 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1104 WDA 2019

Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered July 8, 2019

In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Criminal Division at 

No(s): CP-02-CR-0014168-2014

BEFORE: McLAUGHLIN, J., McCAFFERY, J., and PELLEGRINI, J.*

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PELLEGRINI, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 7, 2020

Jessie James Holley (Holley) appeals pro se from the order entered in 

the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (PCRA court) dismissing his 

first petition for relief filed pursuant to the Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 

42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. Because the PCRA court failed to issue notice of its 

intent to dismiss under Pa.R.Crim.P. 907(a), we vacate and remand.

On August 8, 2017, Holley was sentenced to serve an aggregate 35 to 

70 years’ imprisonment after being convicted by a jury of numerous sexual 

offenses. After the denial of post-sentence motions, Holley appealed. This 

Court affirmed the judgment of sentence on October 15, 2018. See

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S03034-20

- 2 -

Commonwealth v. Holley, 1353 WDA 2017 (Pa. Super. 2018) (unpublished 

memorandum).

On January 9, 2019, Holley filed a pro se PCRA petition and was 

appointed counsel. However, just two months later, Holley requested he be 

permitted to represent himself. Consequently, on April 29, 2019, the PCRA 

court held a hearing pursuant to Commonwealth v. Grazier, 713 A.2d 81 

(Pa. 1998), and granted Holley’s request to proceed pro se. The PCRA court 

further ordered that if Holley wished to file an amended PCRA petition, he

needed to file it within 60 days. Holley never filed an amended petition and 

on July 8, 2019, the PCRA court entered an order dismissing Holley’s petition

without hearing.

After Holley filed a notice of appeal, the PCRA court issued a statement 

in lieu of opinion requesting that this matter be remanded so that it can issue 

a notice of intent to dismiss as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 907, which it had 

failed to do before dismissing Holley’s petition. In its brief, the Commonwealth 

agrees with the PCRA court’s position and requests that this Court remand this 

matter for the issuance of a Rule 907 notice which Holley may respond to.

We agree with the PCRA court that remand is appropriate. Pennsylvania

Rule of Criminal Procedure 907 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

the judge shall promptly review the petition, any answer by the 

attorney for the Commonwealth, and other matters of record 

relating to the defendant’s claim(s). If the judge is satisfied from 

this review that there are no genuine issues concerning any 

material fact and that the defendant is not entitled to postconviction collateral relief, and no purpose would be served by any 
J-S03034-20

- 3 -

further proceedings, the judge shall give notice to the parties of 

the intention to dismiss the petition and shall state in the notice 

the reasons for the dismissal. The defendant may respond to the 

proposed dismissal within 20 days of the date of the notice. The 

judge thereafter shall order the petition dismissed, grant leave to 

file an amended petition, or direct that the proceedings continue.

Pa.R.Crim.P. 907(1). A PCRA court’s compliance with this rule is mandatory.

See Commonwealth v. Feighery, 661 A.2d 437, 439 (Pa. Super. 1995) (“It 

is, of course, clear that the notice requirement of the intention to dismiss, is 

mandatory (‘the judge shall (give notice and) shall state (the reasons)’ ”) 

(emphasis in original).

Even though Holley did not file an amended PCRA petition, this did not 

alleviate the PCRA court of issuing a Rule 907 notice before dismissing his 

petition. On remand, the PCRA court shall comply with Rule 907 and issue a

notice stating the reasons for its intent to dismiss Holley’s PCRA petition. In 

accordance with the rule, Holley may respond to the notice within 20 days of 

its issuance.

Order vacated; case remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 2/7/2020
J-S03034-20

- 4 -