alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Stewards of the Sea Menu**

                    - Stewards of the Sea Home
                    - About the Program and Exhibit
                    - Press Room                        - News
                      - Videos
                      - Photos
                    - Meet Stewie — the Navy's Environmental Mascot
                    - Fleet Installations and Environmental

Jul 04 2020

Bobbie Camp

170528-N-MS174-003 JERSEY CITY, N.J. (May 28, 2017) Stewie, the U.S. Navy's environmental turtle mascot, gives a visitor a high-five at the “Stewards of the Sea: Defending Freedom, Protecting the Environment” exhibit at Liberty State Park during Fleet Week New York. The Navy employs every means available to mitigate the potential environmental effects of our activities without jeopardizing the safety of our Sailors or impacting our Navy readiness mission. (U.S. Navy photo by Bobbie A. Camp/Released)
DetailsDownloadShare
Jul 06 2020

MC3 Jesse A. Hyatt

150314-N-XJ695-138 NORFOLK (March 14, 2015) Stewie the friendly environmental turtle, played by Fire Controlman 1st Class Jason Mosher, from Alamogordo, N.M., teaches Girl Scouts about the Navy's efforts to improve the environment during the 2nd Annual Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Day at the Nauticus Museum. More than 200 Girl Scouts participated in the event to see how STEM subjects can be applied in different career fields. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jesse A. Hyatt/Released)
DetailsDownloadShare
Jul 04 2020

Bobbie Camp

170527-N-MS174-004 NEW YORK (May 27, 2017) A child watches a cartoon featuring the U.S. Navy’s environmental turtle mascot, Stewie, at the U.S. Navy’s “Stewards of the Sea: Defending Freedom, Protecting the Environment�? exhibit aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) during Fleet Week New York. The Navy employs every means available to mitigate the potential environmental effects of our activities without jeopardizing the safety of our Sailors or impacting our Navy readiness mission. (U.S. Navy photo by Bobbie A. Camp/Released)
DetailsDownloadShare
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION

I, **Kenneth Phillippe**, certify that:

(1)         I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 of FinMetal Mining Ltd. (the "Report");

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;

(4)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     November 14, 2007.

/s/ "*Kenneth Phillippe*"
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1498

___________ John I. Bell, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 17, 2004 Filed: February 9, 2005

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BEAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Following surgery to repair a badly fractured shoulder and arm in April 2000, John I. Bell applied for social security disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. After a hearing at which Bell testified that he cannot close his left hand or grasp small objects, cannot raise his left arm, and has constant pain in his left hand and shoulder plus chronic back pain, the administrative law judge (ALJ) ruled that Bell is not entitled to benefits because, although he has severe impairments to his left arm and back, his subjective complaints of disabling pain are not credible and he1 The HONORABLE RICHARD E. DORR, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- retains the residual functional capacity to perform his past relevant work as sales clerk and head cashier. Bell then filed this action against the Commissioner of Social Security, seeking judicial review of the adverse agency decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Bell argued that the ALJ failed to fully investigate the physical and mental demands of Bell’s past relevant work and improperly relied on the testimony of a vocational expert whose description of Bell’s past relevant work conflicted with the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT). The district court 1 granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner, concluding in a thorough opinion that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the agency’s decision, that the ALJ with the assistance of the vocational expert made an adequate inquiry into the nature of Bell’s past relevant work as he actually performed it, and that the vocational expert’s testimony did not conflict with the DOT. Bell appeals, raising the same issues to this court. After careful review of the administrative record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s Order dated January 27, 2004.

______________________________
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the filing of the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 28,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Stephen R. Wright, General Manager and
Secretary of Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pro-Fac
Cooperative, Inc.


Dated: May 13, 2004                           /s/ Stephen R. Wright
      ----------------------             ---------------------------------------
                                         General Manager and Secretary
                                         (Principal Executive Officer and
                                         Principal Financial Officer)

                                      75
#### Marie Martrano et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Arthur Martrano and Another, Infants, et al., Respondents, v Erik Entin, Appellant.

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated September 3, 1985, as denied that branch of his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which was to dismiss the cause of action asserted by the plaintiff Marie Martrano.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the cause of action of the plaintiff Marie Martrano is granted.

According to the allegations of the complaint, which must be accepted as true for the purpose of the motion to dismiss *(see, Becker v Schwartz,*46 NY2d 401, 408), the plaintiff Marie Martrano consulted the defendant, a physician specializing in the field of neurology, after experiencing certain symptoms of possible neurological illness. She informed the defendant that she and her husband, the plaintiff Douglas Martrano, were planning to have a family, and she expressed concern as to whether she would be healthy enough to care for children. Dr. Entin, after examining Mrs. Martrano, allegedly informed her *814"that she was healthy and that there was no medical or illness-related reason that she should not conceive”.

Mrs. Martrano ultimately gave birth to two children, both of whom were born with serious physical impairments that will require special care and treatment. Several months after the birth of the second child, Marie Martrano was diagnosed as suffering from multiple sclerosis. This debilitating illness substantially limits her ability to care for her children. While the plaintiffs do not allege that the defendant is responsible for the illnesses suffered by either Marie Martrano or the two infants, they nevertheless claim that Dr. Entin, at the time he rendered advice concerning Mrs. Martrano’s ability to conceive and care for children "knew or had reason to suspect that [she] was suffering with a neurological disease or ailment that would render it difficult or impossible for her to care for her children”. Because of Dr. Entin’s alleged negligent advice, the plaintiffs sought to recover damages for the expenses that will be incurred for the care and rearing of the two disabled children.

Contrary to the conclusions of Special Term, we find that the plaintiff Marie Martrano failed to set forth a cognizable cause of action upon which to predicate an award for the damages sought herein. Mollen, P. J., Weinstein, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
# C_2009203EN.01000601.xml

| 28.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/6

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 203/03

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Rouen–Lyon (Saint-Exupéry) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 25 December 2009 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Arrêté du 9 juillet 2009 relatif à l’imposition d’OSP sur les services aériens réguliers entre Rouen et Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)
  NOR: DEVA0915880A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do





  Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| Courriel: osp-compagnies@dta.aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Concerned route

Rouen–Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

25 December 2009

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Arrêté du 9 juillet 2009 relatif à l’imposition d’OSP sur les services aériens réguliers entre Rouen et Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)

NOR: DEVA0915880A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

Courriel: osp-compagnies@dta.aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the  Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, David C. Benoit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s David C. Benoit
David C. Benoit
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
| By:          | /s/   Jason Castenir                                                                                                 |   |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:        |        Jason Castenir                                                                            |   |
| Title:  |        Chief Executive Officer       (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|         |                                                                                                                           |   |
| Date:        | June 3, 2016                                                                                                                   |   |

| By:          | /s/   Jason Castenir                                                                                                  |   |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:        |        Jason Castenir                                                                             |   |
| Title:  |        Chief Executive Officer       (Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
|         |                                                                                                                            |   |
| Date:        | June 3, 2016                                                                                                                    |   |
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

No. 18-2062 

SCOTT JORDAN, JR., 

Plaintiff, Appellant, 

v. 

TOWN OF WALDOBORO; WILLIAM LABOMBARDE, 

Waldoboro Chief of Police; LAWRENCE W. HESSELTINE, JR., 

Waldoboro Police Officer; JEFFERY FULLER, 

Waldoboro Police Officer; ANDREW SANTHESON, 

Waldoboro Police Officer, 

Defendants, Appellees, 

WALDOBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

Defendant. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion of this Court issued on November 27, 2019, is 

amended as follows: 

On page 19, line 21, "Senior property" is 

replaced with "Senior's property"
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Glass, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered January 18, 1985, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, and conspiracy in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Marvin Weinstein was arrested after selling cocaine to undercover police officers, and following the arrest, telephoned the defendant at the behest of the police. The evidence, including the recorded conversation of that call, as well as a recording of a later meeting between Weinstein and the defendant, at which the defendant asked for and received the proceeds of the recently consummated sale, was sufficient to allow the jurors to draw an inference that the defendant was the unnamed accomplice and supplier to whom Weinstein had so frequently referred during recorded telephone negotiations with one of the undercover officers preceding the sale. The evidence, when viewed in its totality, and in the light most favorable to the prosecution, proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with the mental culpability necessary to commit the crimes charged and that, in furtherance thereof, he solicited, requested, commanded, importuned, or intentionally aided the seller to commit the crimes of criminal sale and possession of a controlled substance *(see,*Penal Law § 20.00; *People v Karchefski,*102 AD2d 856; *see*
      *706
      *also, People v Di Napoli,*66 NY2d 812). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit or unpreserved for our review. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  about 

#           Documents      

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

This is a collection of supporting documents to include instructions, training materials, technical memos, flowcharts, analytical references, and more. 

Official USGS Publications

**File icon

December 30, 1993

####   TM94-04 Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry to replace Direct-Current Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry for the determination of chromium in water

**File icon

December 22, 1993

####   TM94-03 Change in Method for Determining Chloride, Sulfate, and Fluoride

**File icon

December 10, 1993

####   TM94-02 NWQL Policy on pH Analytical Determinations

**File icon

October 18, 1993

####   TM94-01 Discontinuance of analysis of unfiltered (raw) water samples for radionuclides by the National Water Quality Laboratory (NWQL) - Discontinuance of analysis of unfiltered, acidified samples for total uranium

**File icon

September 10, 1993

####   MOU between USGS and Bureau of Land Management - cartographic services

**File icon

August 25, 1993

####   TM 93-10 Interferences in the Methylene Blue Active Substances [MBAS] Method, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigation [TWRI], [0-311-83], Book 5, Chapter A3.

**File icon

August 24, 1993

####   TM93-09 Radon - Discontinuance of duplicate samples for radon-in-water. - Change in window setting for analysis.

**File icon

August 1, 1993

####   MOU between USGS and the U.S. Forest Service - quadrangle map

**File icon

May 26, 1993

####   TM93-08 New Inorganic Tissue Method

**File icon

March 18, 1993

####   MOU between USGS and U.S. Airforce

**File icon

March 15, 1993

####   TM93-07 Problems with Laboratory pH analytical determinations

**File icon

March 11, 1993

####   TM93-06 Raising the method detection limit for gross alpha and gross beta

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
- ...
-                Page            487 
-                Page            488 
-                Page            489 
-                Page            490 
-                Current page            491 
-                Page            492 
-                Page            493 
-                Page            494 
-                Page            495 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
NUMBER 13

- 20

- 0 0 392

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ANITA K. MOORE A/K/A ANNA K. MOORE, AND
ALL OCCUPANTS

, Appellant s ,

v.

GREGORY GLEN SPIVEY

, Appellee

.

_

___________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 5
of Nueces County, Texas.

_

___________________________________________________________


## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria , and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

On September 14 , 2020 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the notice of

appeal did not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e) and was provided

thirty days to correct the defect. On October 20, 2020, the Clerk of the court notified2 appellant that her docketing statement had not been timely received. Finally, on October

20, 2020, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that a $205.00 filing fee was past due

and that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days

fr om the date of receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court ’ s notice , failed to cure a defect in the

notice of appeal, and has failed to pay the filing fee

. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PR OSECUTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(b), (c).

GINA M. BENAVIDES
Justice

D elivered and filed the
7 th day of January , 202 1

.
# C_2009070EN.01003201.xml

| 24.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/32

---

Corrigendum to list of natural mineral waters recognised by Member States

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 54 of 7 March 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 54 of 7 March 2009

(2009/C 70/10)

On page 72, the list should read as follows:

for:

| ‘Sales description | Name of source | Place of exploitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Icelandic spring | Jadar spring area | Reykjavík’ |

‘Sales description

Name of source

Place of exploitation

Icelandic spring

Jadar spring area

Reykjavík’

read:

| ‘Sales description | Name of source | Place of exploitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Icelandic Glacial | Ölfus Spring | Hlíðarendi, Ölfus, Selfoss’ |

‘Sales description

Name of source

Place of exploitation

Icelandic Glacial

Ölfus Spring

Hlíðarendi, Ölfus, Selfoss’

---