alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  SPIEGEL, INC.

                             Listing of Subsidiaries
                                December 29, 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Corporation                                          Incorporated In
-----------------------------------------------             -----------------
<S>                                                       <C>
Distribution Fulfillment Services, Inc.                         Delaware

East Coast Collection Agency, Inc.                              Delaware

Eddie Bauer, Inc.                                               Delaware

Eddie Bauer of Canada, Inc. (1)                                  Canada

First Consumers National Bank                                Federal Charter

First Credit Services, Inc.                                     Delaware

First Consumers Credit Corporation (2)                          Delaware

New Hampton Realty Corporation (3)                              Delaware

Newport News, Inc. (formerly New Hampton, Inc.)                 Delaware

Retailer Financial Products, Inc.                               Delaware

S.I. Reinsurance Limited                                  Turks & Caicos Islands

FCSI Reinsurance Limited                                  Turks & Caicos Islands

Spiegel Acceptance Corporation                                  Delaware

Spiegel Cares                                                   Illinois

Spiegel Catalog, Inc.                                           Delaware

Spiegel Credit Corporation III                                  Delaware

Spiegel Management Group, Inc.                                  Delaware

Spiegel Marketing Corporation
    (formerly Boutique Europa, Inc.)                            Delaware

Spiegel Publishing Company                                      Illinois

Spiegel Group Teleservice, Inc.
    (formerly Spiegel Teleservice, Inc.)                        Illinois

The Spiegel Foundation                                          Illinois

Ultimate Outlet, Inc.                                           Delaware

Spiegel Hermes General Service, LLC                             Delaware

Financial Services Acceptance Corp.                             Delaware

Spiegel Group Teleservices-Canada, Inc.                          Canada

Newport News Services, LLC (3)                                    Ohio

Eddie Bauer Services, LLC (1)                                     Ohio

Spiegel Catalog Services, LLC (4)                                 Ohio
</TABLE>

(1)  Wholly owned subsidiary of Eddie Bauer, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
     of  Spiegel, Inc.

(2)  Wholly owned subsidiary of First Consumers National Bank, a wholly owned
     subsidiary of Spiegel, Inc.

(3)  Wholly owned subsidiary of Newport News, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
     of Spiegel, Inc.

(4)  Wholly owned subsidiary of Spiegel Catalog, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
     of Spiegel, Inc.

                                       91
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05551-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05551-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) OF POGO PRODUCING COMPANY,
INCLUDING THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF 12-31-1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED 
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE 12 MOS. ENDED 12-31-1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,959
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     11,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,367
<PP&E>                                       1,718,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                 992,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 862,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,479
<BONDS>                                        434,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,136
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   862,396
<SALES>                                        202,895<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,803
<CGS>                                           71,213<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,213<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               188,810<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F5>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (70,849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,751
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,098)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,098)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)
<FN>
<F1>THIS AMOUNT IS NOT DISCLOSED ON THE FACE OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS DUE TO LACK OF MATERIALITY, BUT IS INCLUDED AS A CONTRA-ASSET IN
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.
<F2>DOES NOT INCLUDE GAINS OR LOSSES ON PROPERTY SALES.
<F3>INCLUDES LEASE OPERATING EXPENSE AND NATURAL GAS PURCHASES AND PIPELINE
OPERATIONS, BUT EXCLUDES GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE, EXPLORATION, DRY HOLE AND
IMPAIRMENT AND DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSES.
<F4>INCLUDES GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE, EXPLORATION, DRY HOLE AND IMPAIRMENT AND
DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSES.
<F5>THIS AMOUNT IS NOT DISCLOSED ON THE FACE OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS DUE TO LACK OF MATERIALITY, BUT IS INCLUDED IN OIL AND GAS REVENUES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009307EN.01002701.xml

| 17.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/27

---

Extract from the decision concerning DSB Bank N.V. pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

2009/C 307/08

Announcement of Decision

Announcement of Decision

By Decision of the Amsterdam District Court dated 12 October 2009, No HA RK 09-785, at the request of De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam, the interim procedure referred to in Article 3:202 of the Law on Financial Supervision is hereby declared applicable to the public company under Dutch law.

DSB Bank N.V. Registered and having offices at Dick Ketlaan 6-10, Wognum, registered with the Chamber of Trade and Industry for north-western Holland under File No 37088128. The legal basis for the interim procedure is Section 3.5.5. of the Law on Financial Supervision. Unless otherwise stipulated the interim procedure is subject to Dutch law. De Nederlandsche Bank is the authorised supervisor.

DSB Bank N.V.

By judgment of 19 October 2009 of the Court of Amsterdam the above mentioned interim procedure has legally come to an end and bankruptcy of DSB Bank N.V. within the meaning of Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 (Insolvency Regulation) is established. Mr M.L.D. Akkaya, a member of the Court of Amsterdam, is appointed as Delegated Judge. Mr R.J. Graaf Schimmelpenninck, solicitor, having offices at Houthoff Buruma N.V., P.O. Box 75505, 1070 AM Amsterdam, NEDERLAND and Mr J. Kuiper are appointed as administrators. An appeal against this decision may be submitted within eight days to Amsterdam Court of Appeal, Prinsengracht 436, 1017 KE Amsterdam, NEDERLAND. To the best of the administrators’ knowledge no appeal has been submitted.

---
#### David Yankowitz, Petitioner, v Charles A. Kuffner, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent from conducting a trial on Richmond County indictment No. 278/88 on the ground that to proceed to trial would cause the petitioner to be prosecuted for the *693same offense on multiple occasions, in which the District Attorney of Richmond County has moved for an order dismissing the proceeding on the ground that a writ of prohibition does not lie under the facts and circumstances alleged.

Ordered that the People’s motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner, a dentist, was charged in indictment No. 278/88 with four counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. The acts were allegedly committed upon the same victim during the course of a root canal procedure on or about January 30, 1988. He asserts that the alleged acts should be considered one "transaction” and, therefore, the indictment should consist of only one count, and not four.

The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie as a means of seeking collateral review of an error of law, no matter how egregious, in a pending criminal matter *(see, Matter of Kramer v Rosenberger,*107 AD2d 748, 749). The proper procedure is for the petitioner to seek redress in the trial court in the first instance. In the event of his ultimate conviction, his remedy would then be a direct appeal from the judgment *(see, Matter of Lipari v Owens,*70 NY2d 731; *Matter of Molea v Marasco,*64 NY2d 718). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1779 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1779

 To amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to authorize a person 
 awarded the Medal of Honor to designate an individual to receive the 
          special pension after death, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the 
Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to authorize a person 
 awarded the Medal of Honor to designate an individual to receive the 
          special pension after death, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING A PERSON AWARDED THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO DESIGNATE 
              AN INDIVIDUAL TO RECEIVE THE SPECIAL PENSION AFTER DEATH.

    (a) In General.--Section 1562 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting 
                ``(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
    ``(2) A person described in paragraph (1) may designate an 
individual to receive the special pension under this section after the 
death of that person by notifying the Secretary of such designation in 
writing. In the case of a Medal of Honor that is awarded posthumously, 
the individual authorized under section 1482(c) of title 10 to direct 
disposition of the remains of the person shall be treated as such a 
designee.'';
            (2) in subsection (d), by inserting ``(or the designee of 
        such person under subsection (a)(2))'' before ``shall not''; 
        and
            (3) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ``person who is in 
        receipt of special pension payable under this section'' and 
        inserting ``person described in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) 
        (or the designee of such a person under paragraph (2) of that 
        subsection)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1134a of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``living''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), in the second sentence, by inserting 
        ``(or the designee of that person under subsection (a)(2) of 
        that section)'' before the period.
                                 <all>
```
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00196-CR 

 

LASHA EILEEN SPACEK, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 428th District Court 

Hays County, Texas1 

Trial Court No. CR-19-1300-D, Honorable Daniel H. Mills, Sitting by Assignment 

April 5, 2023 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Lasha Eileen Spacek, appeals her conviction for theft2 and sentence to 

two years’ confinement in a state jail facility. Appellant’s brief was originally due 

December 28, 2022, but we granted Appellant’s appointed counsel two extensions to file 

a brief due to counsel’s caseload. By letter of February 13, 2023, we admonished 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.

2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(e)(4)(D).
2

Appellant’s counsel that no further extensions would be granted and that failure to file a 

brief by March 27 would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the 

trial court for further proceedings. Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief or had any 

further communication with this Court to date.

We, therefore, abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall 

determine the following:

(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

(2) whether Appellant is indigent;

(3) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;

(4) whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;

(5) whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;

(6) whether new counsel should be appointed; and

(7) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect 

Appellant’s brief to be filed.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a 

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by May 5, 2023. If 

it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has 

been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel; 

the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly 

appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
3

Should counsel file a brief on or before April 19, 2023, he is directed to immediately 

notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required 

to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Central Midwest Water Science Center 

#           Director's Message      

      By Central Midwest Water Science Center

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Maps 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  Software 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

The USGS Central Midwest Water Science Center primarily addresses water issues; maintaining long-term and extensive data-collection networks, and research of water, mapping, biology and geology issues in Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri.

The USGS was established by Congress in 1879 to provide the Nation with reliable and impartial information in order to understand the Nation's natural resources. This information is used to protect life and property from natural disasters, manage the Nation's natural resources, and protect the environment. The USGS is a scientific organization concerned with providing credible, relevant, impartial, and timely information to all.

Today, the USGS is known for its long-term and extensive data-collection networks, and research of water, mapping, biology and geology issues in Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri and throughout the Nation. These efforts provide policy makers, managers, and scientists, and the general public with information needed to understand and make decisions about our three state's natural resources.

The USGS Central Midwest Water Science Center primarily addresses water issues. These include flooding and surface- and groundwater quality. The Central Midwest Water Science Center investigates the occurrence, distribution, quantity, movement, and chemical and biological quality of Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri's surface and groundwater. Specific water resources activities of the Central Midwest Water Science Center include maintenance and analysis of long-term (prior to the turn of the Century) quantitative and qualitative data for streams, reservoirs, estuaries, and groundwater; and short-term interpretive investigations of specific water-resources issues on a local, State, regional, and national level. Such investigations include the study of urbanization and flooding, water quality of Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri's major river basins, sedimentation of rivers and lakes, and contamination of surface water and groundwater by hazardous waste.

*Amy M. Beussink – Director*
#### PEOPLE ex rel. RITZENTHALER v. HIGGINS et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted. See 28 N. Y. Supp. 458.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,301,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   821,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,025,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,633,000
<PP&E>                                      46,980,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,834,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,118,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,384,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       239,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,001,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,118,000
<SALES>                                     28,694,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,694,000
<CGS>                                       25,053,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,253,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (89,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             387,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,036,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,037,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.27)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Commercial Power Finance, Inc., General Partner of Telecommunications Income
Fund XI, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify that this Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005, and the financial statements therein, fully comply
with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB and the financial
statements therein fairly present, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the
report.


August 10, 2005                             /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas J. Berthel
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Commercial Power Finance, Inc.
                                                 General Partner
                                                 Telecommunications Income
                                                 Fund XI, L.P.