alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1599 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make grants to eligible 

organizations for the provision of transition assistance to members of 

the Armed Forces recently separated from active duty service and spouses 

of such members. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. RUTHERFORD (for himself, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mr. PETERS, Mr. 

WALTZ, Mr. YOHO, and Mr. PETERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make 

grants to eligible organizations for the provision of transition assistance to members of the Armed Forces recently separated from active duty service and spouses 

of such members. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Armed for 

5 Success Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1599 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR PROVISION OF TRANSITION ASSIST2 ANCE TO MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 

3 RECENTLY SEPARATED FROM ACTIVE DUTY 

4 SERVICE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

6 shall make grants to eligible organizations for the provi7 sion of transition assistance to members of the Armed 

8 Forces who are recently retired, separated, or discharged 

9 from the Armed Forces and spouses of such members. 

10 (b) USE OF FUNDS.—The recipient of a grant under 

11 this section shall use the grant to provide to members of 

12 the Armed Forces and spouses described in subsection (a) 

13 resume assistance, interview training, job recruitment 

14 training, and related services leading directly to successful 

15 transition, as determined by the Secretary. 

16 (c) ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.—To be eligible for a 

17 grant under this section, an organization shall submit to 

18 the Secretary an application containing such information 

19 and assurances as the Secretary, in consultation with the 

20 Secretary of Labor, may require. 

21 (d) PRIORITY FOR HUBS OF SERVICE.—In making 

22 grants under this section, the Secretary shall give priority 

23 to an organization that provides multiple forms of services 

24 described in subsection (b). 

25 (e) AMOUNT OF GRANT.—A grant under this section 

26 shall be in an amount that does not exceed 50 percent 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1599 IH

1 of the amount required by the organization to provide the 

2 services described in subsection (b). 

3 (f) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—The Sec4 retary shall begin carrying out this section not later than 

5 six months after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

6 (g) TERMINATION.—The authority to provide a grant 

7 under this section shall terminate on the date that is five 

8 years after the date on which the Secretary begins car9 rying out this section. 

10 (h) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

11 authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out 

12 this section. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Clear All

        07 October 2022    

                    USS Billings (Gold Crew) Returns Home After 4th Fleet Deployment                 
                MAYPORT, Fla. - The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Billings (LCS 15) Gold Crew returned to Mayport, Fla., Oct. 7th, following its second successful deployment to the U.S. 4th Fleet area of operations.            

        31 May 2022    

                    USS Billings (LCS 15) Continues Deployment to U.S. 4th Fleet                 
                PONCE, Puerto Rico - The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Billings (LCS 15) departed Ponce, Puerto Rico May 27, continuing its deployment in the U.S. 4th Fleet area of operations.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 3-2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF Document 30 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF Document 30 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        30 April 2021    

#                     CNIC, USFFC to Conduct Hurricane/Disaster Response Exercise                 

                HURREX/CG 21 is conducted over a two-week period with this year's exercise running from May 3-14. The first week simulates a storm system along U.S. Atlantic coast and the second week shifts focus to procedures for recovery from severe weather events.The annual hurricane preparedness/disaster            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# Small Business Week, 2001

Small business owners who work long hours, juggling family and career responsibilities and serving as community volunteers, are integral to our country's prosperity and to the vibrancy of our communities. These entrepreneurs are fundamental to our economy. Through the opportunities offered by the men and women who own and operate our Nation's 25.5 million small businesses, many of our citizens are able to pursue their dreams of a better life.

Federal, State, and local governments can help our small business owners by creating an environment in which the American spirit flourishes, an environment that promotes innovation, risk-taking, and equal opportunity. My Administration is working for lower taxes, reasonable regulations, and a reduction of tariffs and other barriers to free trade that will increase the competitive strength of our small business sector. Education reforms also will ensure that our young people are prepared to enter the global marketplace and small businesses will have the needed pool of talent.

Many of America's entrepreneurs risk everything to make their businesses successful. They are leaders of innovation, and their efforts create a wellspring of new technology, new products, and improved business processes. One of my priorities as President is to encourage that entrepreneurial spirit, and to see that it encompasses all Americans. To that end, we have instituted the New Freedom Initiative, which includes a component to help small businesses better serve customers with disabilities and to hire more people with disabilities. Also, my Administration supports the Drug Free Workplace Program, to help small businesses develop employee education programs and company drug policies. These are examples of our commitment to the ideal that the role of our Government is not to create business barriers, but to help our citizens overcome them.

America's small business owners and their employees represent more than half of the private workforce. These entrepreneurs, who create more than 75 percent of the net new jobs nationwide and generate more than 50 percent of the Nation's gross domestic product, and the employees who work in small businesses, deserve our thanks. We salute them by observing Small Business Week.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 6 through 12, 2001, as Small Business Week. I urge all Americans to join in observing this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.                          ( print page 23536)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 01-11850

Billing code 3195-01-P
(85 South. 923)

#### Ex parte MIDDLETON.

(6 Div. 10.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 30, 1919.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

R. H. & R. M. Smith & Middleton, of Mobile, for appellant.

W. A. Denson, of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of J. O. Middleton for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court reversing the appeal of W. A. Denson v. J. O. Middleton, 84 South. 473. Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000225544
<NAME> KNUSAGA CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          34,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,104,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    506,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,826,327
<PP&E>                                       2,894,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                 796,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,957,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,735,485
<BONDS>                                      1,867,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,957,502
<SALES>                                      8,177,943
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,201,655
<CGS>                                        7,342,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,507,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               190,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             196,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (27,733)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009206DE.01000601.xml

| 1.9.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 206/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 206/6

---

Berichtigung des Anhangs V zur Mitteilung der Kommission über die Behandlung wertgeminderter Aktiva im Bankensektor der Gemeinschaft

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 72 vom 26. März 2009
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 72 vom 26. März 2009

2009/C 206/03

S. 22, Anhang V „Beihilfeverfahren“, zweiter Absatz, erster Satz:

Statt:

„Wird einer Bank entweder als Einzelmaßnahme oder im Rahmen einer genehmigten Entlastungsregelung eine Beihilfe gewährt, so muss der Mitgliedstaat der Kommission spätestens im Zuge der Übermittelung des Umstrukturierungsplans oder der Rentabilitätsanalyse ausführliche Informationen über die entlasteten Vermögenswerte und deren Bewertung zum Zeitpunkt der Beihilfegewährung sowie die bestätigten und validierten Ergebnisse der Offenlegung von Wertminderungen bei den entlasteten Vermögenswerten bereitstellen (3).“

3

muss es heißen:

„Wird einer Bank entweder als Einzelmaßnahme oder im Rahmen einer genehmigten Entlastungsregelung eine Beihilfe gewährt, so muss der Mitgliedstaat der Kommission spätestens im Zuge der jeweiligen Anmeldung hinsichtlich des Umstrukturierungsplans oder der Rentabilitätsanalyse ausführliche Informationen über die entlasteten Vermögenswerte und deren Bewertung zum Zeitpunkt der Beihilfegewährung sowie die bestätigten und validierten Ergebnisse der Offenlegung von Wertminderungen bei den entlasteten Vermögenswerten bereitstellen (3).“

3

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7185** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. IVO SVETOZAROV DAMYANOV , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Catherine C. Blake , Chief District Judge . ( 1:11

- cr - 00120

- CCB

- 1 ; 1:13

- cv - 01308

- CCB )

Submitted : November 18, 2014 Decided: November 21, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Ivo Svetozarov Damyanov , Appellant Pro Se. Kristi Noel O’ Malley , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Greenbelt , Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ivo Svetozarov Damyanov seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certi ficate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional rig ht.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a de batable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Damyanov has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss t he appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Carter, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered November 21, 1986, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2), by permission, from an order of the same court, dated February 23, 1988, which denied the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction.

Ordered that the judgment and the order are affirmed.

For the reasons identified in *People v Legette*(153 AD2d 760 [decided herewith]), the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 440.10 was properly denied. Similarly, and for reasons also identified in *People v Legette (supra),*the court properly ordered the closure of the courtroom during the testimony of the two undercover officers and the civilian informant involved in the case.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support a finding of the defendant’s guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
No. 85503

T., "UV g Z.OZI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF

### THE STATE OF NEVADA CINDY KIRBY, Appellant, vs. HSBC BANK USA. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS

### TuRsTT FOR HOMESTAR 2004-6, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSINGAPPEAL

This appeal was docketed on October 13, 2022, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 7 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal ofthis appeal. 

### To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).

It is so O.RDKRED. CLERKOF THE SUPREME COTIRT ELIZABETH A.BROWN BY:

cc: Hon.. David M. Jones, District Judge Law Offices of'Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. 'Malcolm Cisneros\Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER

111'1 1447 

# 22-L 3LA

# 2_28
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 43 of 43
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1758 

To provide for the retroactive application of the mandatory increase in insurance coverage under the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance for members of the Armed Forces deployed to combat theaters of operation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Mrs. HARTZLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the retroactive application of the mandatory 

increase in insurance coverage under the 

Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance for members of 

the Armed Forces deployed to combat theaters of operation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoration for the 

5 Families of the Fallen Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1758 IH

1 SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF INCREASE IN IN2 SURANCE COVERAGE UNDER 

3 SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 

4 FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

5 FORCES. 

6 Subparagraph (D) of section 1967(a)(3) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, as added by section 625 of the John 

8 S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

9 Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1801), shall 

10 apply with respect to deployments to a combat theater of 

11 operations occurring on or after November 1, 2006. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS