alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-05-0112-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B JANUARY 4, 2006

______________________________ FIRST STATE BANK, Appellant

v. BACC FA RMS, LTD . and ROC KIN’ LAZ Y S CATT LE CO., IN C.,

Appellees

_________________________________ FROM THE 69th DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUNTY; NO. 04-32; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. FirstState Bank, appellant, and BACC Farms, Ltd. and Rockin’ Lazy S Cattle C o., Inc., a ppellees, have filed a joint motion to reverse judgment pursuant to a settle men t agreemen t. So too do they ask that we reman d the cau se to the trial cou rt for entr yof an order dismissing the suit with prejudice. Per the requ est o f the parties, we grant the motion, reverse t he judgme nt, and re mand the cause to the trial court to effectua te the settlementagreemen t. See Dunn v. Canadian Oil & Gas Services, Inc ., 908 S.W.2d 3232

(Tex. App.–El Paso 1995, no pet.) (authorizing such rel ief). Having reversed the judgment and remanded the cause to the trial court at th e request of the parties, no motion for rehearin g will b e enterta ined and our mand ate shal l issue forthwith

.
Brian Quinn Chief Justice
## Breadcrumb

-  about 
-  About Us 

-  About 
-  About Us     -  Who We Are 
  -  Our History 
  -  Past Directors 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

#               Past Directors          

The following is a list of the individuals who have served as Directors of the USGS since its formation in 1879.

#### Jim Reilly

Director, U.S. Geological Survey2018-2021 

#### Suzette Kimball

Director, U.S. Geological Survey2015 - 2017

#### Marcia K. McNutt

Director, U.S. Geological Survey2009-2013

#### Mark Myers

Director, U.S. Geological Survey2006-2009

#### Charles G. Groat

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1998-2005

#### Gordon P. Eaton

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1994-1997

#### Dallas Lynn Peck

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1981-1993

#### Henry William Menard

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1978-1981

#### Vincent Ellis McKelvey

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1971-1978

#### William Thomas Pecora

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1965-1971

#### Thomas Brennan Nolan

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1956-1965

#### William Embry Wrather

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1943-1956

#### Walter Curran Mendenhall

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1930-1943

#### George Otis Smith

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1907-1930

#### Charles Doolittle Walcott

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1894-1907

#### John Wesley Powell

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1881-1894

#### Clarence King

Director, U.S. Geological Survey1879-1881
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

October 16, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-10231

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00322-CR-1-LSC-HGD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

BENJAMIN LAMONT ROBERSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(October 16, 2007)

Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Bret Gray, appointed counsel for Benjamin Lamont Roberson, has filed a
2

motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and

Roberson’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 37 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 37 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 2 of 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136345 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136345 

 COA: 266617 

Washtenaw CC: 04-001243-FC 

DENNIS WAYNE VESEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 3.2


                              STATE OF DELAWARE
                           CERTIFICATE FOR RENEWAL
                           AND REVIVAL OF CHARTER


     Amber Resources Company of Colorado (formerly known as Amber Resources
Company), a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, the charter of
which was voided for non-payment of taxes, now desires to procure a
restoration, renewal and revival of its charter, and hereby certifies as
follows:

     1.   The name of this corporation is Amber Resources Company of
          Colorado (formerly known as Amber Resources Company).
     2.   Its registered office in the State of Delaware is located at
          Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange St., City of Wilmington, Zip
          Code 19801, County of New Castle, the name and address of its
          registered agent is Corporation Trust Company.
     3.   The date of filing of the original Certificate of Incorporation in
          Delaware was 1/17/1978.
     4.   The date when restoration, renewal, and revival of the charter of
          this company is to commence is the 28th day of February, same
          being prior to the date of the expiration of the charter.  This
          renewal and revival of the charter of this corporation is to be
          perpetual.
     5.   This corporation was duly organized and carried on the business
          authorized by its charter until the 1 day of March, A.D. 1993, at
          which time its charter became inoperative and void for non-payment
          of taxes and this certificate for renewal and revival is filed by
          authority of the duly elected directors of the corporation in
          accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

     IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, and in compliance with the provisions of Section
312 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended,
providing for the renewal, extension and restoration of charters, Aleron H.
Larson, Jr., the last and acting authorized officer hereunto set his/her hand
to this certificate this 16th day of May A.D. 2003.


                              By:  /s/ Aleron H. Larson, Jr.
                                   ---------------------------------
                                        Authorized Officer

                             Name:  Aleron H. Larson, Jr.
                                   ---------------------------------
                                        Print or Type

                            Title:  Chairman and Secretary
                                   ---------------------------------
Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             407
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,096
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,038
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,568
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,460
<LOANS>                                        131,524
<ALLOWANCE>                                        898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,460
<DEPOSITS>                                      92,109
<SHORT-TERM>                                    21,151
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,655
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 151,460
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,123
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  156
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   239
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,518
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,069
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,745
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,773
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    984
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         984
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       602
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.41
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,202
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,147
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   898
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  898
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               421
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            477


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE) 

#           Earth Observing Satellites      

      By EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE)

-  Home 
-  LANDSAT CALVAL 
-  JACIE 
-  Satellite Compendium 
-  Data Quality Assessment 
-  Requirements & Capabilities 
-  Lidar 
-  Uncrewed Aerial 
-  Test Site Catalog 
-  EROS Instrumentation 
-  Community Engagement 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

The images below display the countries that have owned and/or operated Earth observing satellites, and the number of satellites launched each year. The data represented in these images are gathered from various sources and are updated regularly by the USGS ECCOE team.

 The numbers on this map indicate the number of commercial and/or government/civil Earth observing satellites launched by the highlighted countries.

Latest update: May 8, 2024

View Media Details

 

The chart below shows the number of commercial and government/civil Earth observing satellites launched each year since 1972.

​​​​​Latest Update: May 8, 2024

View Media Details

To learn more about past, current, and future Earth observing satellites and sensors, visit the **Earth Observing Satellites Online Compendium**.

## Related Content

                  -              Web Tools           

March 21, 2024

####                 Earth Observing Satellites Online Compendium              

The Earth Observing Satellites Online Compendium contains details about past, present and future Earth observing satellites and the sensors they carry. This information compiled by staff at the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

National Land Imaging Program, EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE), Requirements Capabilities & Analysis for Earth Observations

## Related Content

March 21, 2024

####                 Earth Observing Satellites Online Compendium              

The Earth Observing Satellites Online Compendium contains details about past, present and future Earth observing satellites and the sensors they carry. This information compiled by staff at the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

National Land Imaging Program, EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE), Requirements Capabilities & Analysis for Earth Observations

### Related Information

                        - Online Compendium
EXHIBIT 32
          Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act





      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC.
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an
officer of Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") and in connection with the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December
31, 2008 ("Report"), that:

 *  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)  and 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
 *  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
    as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
    included in the Report.






/s/Michael R. Sand                     /s/Dean J. Brydon
--------------------                   -------------------
Michael R. Sand                        Dean J. Brydon
Chief Executive Officer                Chief Financial Officer



Date: February 5, 2009











                                      42


<PAGE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Yadhira Ainsworth, * From the 70th District Court

 of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. A-43,976.

Vs. No. 11-15-00276-CR * November 30, 2017

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 5 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 5 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
**** 

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransCoastal Corporation (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, Stuart G Hagler, Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

Dated this 7th day of March, 2014

 

/s/ Stuart G. Hagler

 

Stuart G. Hagler

Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 44 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH     Document 24      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH     Document 24      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH     Document 24      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T OCTOB ER 3, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 10 64 6 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 9 :0 4- cr-8 01 04 -WPD-1
UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us AVOCHON T. POSTELL, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Oct ob er 3 , 20 11 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, MARTIN andANDERSON, Circu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:Avo ch on Po st el l, the ap pe ll an t, i s s erv in g asen te nc e fo r ba nkrob be ry th at was im po se d b y th e d is tri ctco urt o n No ve m be r 19 , 20 04 . On Dece m be r 14 , 20 10 , he sen t the di st ric t co urt a l et te r, whi chth e co urt treat edas am ot io n fo r drug tre atm en t wh il e in carc erat ed . The co urt d en ie d t he m ot io n, an d P os te ll , pr oc eed in g pr o s e , no w app eal s. The au th or it y

to gra ntPo st el l’s re qu es t l ie s wi th th e Fed eral Bu reauof Pri so ns , no t the di st ric t co urt. 8 U.S.C. 36 21 (b ),(e); Co ok v. W il ey, 20 8 F .3d13 14 (1 1 Cir . 20 00 ). The c ou rt’s d eci si on de nyin g re li ef i s t he refo re th Affi rm ed .

2
Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit
      10.19**








**Written
      Description of Compensatory Arrangement with Carter Peters**





Carter
      Peters was appointed as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
      of
      Guaranty Federal Bancshares and of Guaranty Bank (the “ Bank ”)
      effective August 8, 2005. The Bank has agreed to pay Mr. Peters an annual salary
      of $125,000, which will be reviewed annually, and may be increased, by the
      Bank.
      Mr. Peters may also receive a performance bonus in 2006 based on the Bank
      achieving profit plan and earnings per share growth. There is no written
      employment agreement between the parties.
Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 2 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 3 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 4 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 5 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 6 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 7 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 8 of 8
#### CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY *v.*BOSWORTH, RECEIVER.

certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the seventh circuit.

No. 11.

Argued October 24, 25, 1899.

Decided December 17, 1900.

This case having been argued with No. 12, *ante,*415, at the same time and by the same counsel, the decision of the court in that case is followed in this.

The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

*Mr. Burton Harrison*for petitioners.

*Mr. Bluford Wilson*for Bosworth.

Mr. Justice White

delivered the opinion of the court.

The decision of the controversy presented in this record is controlled by the principles announced in the opinion just delivered in *Huntting Elevator Company*v. *Bosworth,*No. 12 of this term. The claim of the railroad company was for the value of certain cars, admittedly owned by it, which had been received by the Peoria Company at various times on and prior to October 28, 1894, from a connecting carrier, upon shipments of barley from various points to commission merchants in St. Louis, the cars, except in one or two instances, being routed on the way bills to East St. Louis. The cars so taken by the Peoria Company were deposited on the tracks at East St. Louis set apart for the use of the Peoria Company under the circumstances .disclosed in the opinion in the *Huntting Elevator Company*case, and, while awaiting orders from the consignees for further movement, were destroyed in the fire, of October 28, 1894. The Circuit Court entered a decree in favor of the railroad company, but this decree was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals.

*443For the reasons stated in the opinion in the *Huntting Elevator Company*case

*The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals must be reversed and the decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois affirmed.*