alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel for Geosciences (1756).                    

*Date/Time:*                         May 21-25, 2001; 8:30 am-5:00 pm.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mr. Lawrence Clark, Section Head, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8582.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate the proposals submitted to the Ocean Science Research Programs as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt                               ( print page 22619)                            under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 1, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-11292  Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       8,811,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               53,279,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,716,000
<INVENTORY>                                 39,095,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           110,541,000
<PP&E>                                      27,543,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,036,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             139,923,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,382,000
<BONDS>                                      6,414,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       244,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 166,790,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               139,923,000
<SALES>                                    169,342,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           169,342,000
<CGS>                                       93,847,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               93,847,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,076,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,393,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   745,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            648,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   648,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23277-23278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (01-057)]


NASA Advisory Council, Biological and Physical Research Advisory 
Committee, Commercial Advisory Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Biological and 
Physical Research Advisory Committee, Commercial Advisory Subcommittee.

DATES: Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room MIC-7, 
300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Candace Livingston, Code UM, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 
202-358-0697.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public to 
the seating capacity of the room. Advance notice of attendance to the 
Executive Secretary is requested.
    The agenda for the meeting will include the following topics:
    <bullet> Maximize Commercial Research within current International 
Space Station (ISS) accommodations
    <bullet> Reducing the cost of accessing the ISS
    <bullet> Commercial Hardware Development for use on the ISS
    <bullet> Sharing of Commercial Hardware
    <bullet> Restructure of the ISS Research Program and Priorities
    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.


[[Page 23278]]


    Dated: May 3, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-11557 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GARY V. JENKINS

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 2 3

- 1906 (UNA)

)

UNITED STATES

, et al.

, )

)

Defendant s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Th is matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court GRANTS plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis (ECF No. 2 ) and for the reasons discussed below, DISMISSES the complaint (ECF No.

1) and this civil action without prejudic e.

A pro se litigant’s pleading is held to less stringent standards than would be applied to a

formal pleading drafted by lawyer. See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro

se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch

,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires

that a complaint cont ain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s

jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled

to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P . 8(a). The

purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim

being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense

, and to

determine whether the doctrine of res judicata ap plies. Brown v. Califano , 75 F.R.D. 497, 498

(D.D.C. 1977).2 Th is complaint merely demands a writ of mandamus without setting forth a basis for this

Court’s jurisdiction or alleging facts showing plaintiff is entitled to relief from any defendant

.

And it is unclear whether or how the instant complaint differs from that filed in a previous

action

, the appeal of which is pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the District

of Columbia Circuit. See Jenkins v. United States , No. 23

- 5018 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 25, 20 2 3). As

drafted, plaintiff’s complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a).

An Order is issued separately.

DATE: July 6, 2023 TREVOR N. McFADDEN

United States District Judge
# L\pZ jpf-gp-f'Sfi'^ifi- 5jt^'p-^^vjcjios"^Jjv^^gay
^ ^ ~'I?! 

## 'l^J^ p -l/M^^ iwc^-^/V\ •(, •/^t^'-^Zs. T ^ ^ 0« r«tH to L 

## P°4)1"^<.J, ''^^?^-5H'^5i|'SxmOTu<^.g *n„'^'"r^ M »f -A ^=»l.^<TMM-posto 

### 'f»4%l<>p A.'pbis^i1^ -c •Tft ^ '-"U/ i® Y^YApKi 'Vcv^ I ^/le^ si^inxw-io '^tff uO ' g 

### (lPiXf.cn3W te]«b^'oa^?nj- pr>ijl/~nij!kj.%iiQ (y\cHJ SMMCn S|W^V Clj- 7 

### "TVIVJ. M3N 'R ^mV3H3H NOXiOW
• :: S|/)Qi. iO 3iAaS

— V/'^'/ ^ • /.• jat^O^SUlQ 8S=1IHV "orKwfiD-Wijfe siv3c^c^v 30 mod N.iK' ,9
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cecilio Marte, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J., on motion to suppress; *520John Bradley, J., at trial and sentence), rendered on March 24, 1987, unanimously reversed, upon the stipulation contained in the record, and the indictment dismissed. No opinion. Concur — Ross, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH     Document 2      Filed 06/15/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH     Document 2      Filed 06/15/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 

CAPITALIA ASSET MANAGEMENT SGR S.p.A. 

and CAPITALIA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT 

S.A., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

VIVENDI, S.A., JEAN-MARIE MESSIER 

and GUILLAUME HANNEZO, 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 07 Civ. 5742 (RJH) 

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Please enter the appearance of David J. Goldsmith, a member of the bar of this Court, as 

counsel for Plaintiffs Capitalia Asset Management SGR S.p.A. and Capitalia Investment 

Management S.A. in the above-captioned action. 

Dated: New York, New York Respectfully submitted, 

September 28, 2007 

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

 By: /s/ Russel N. Jacobson__ 

 Russel N. Jacobson (RJ-2268) 

 David J. Goldsmith (DG-7388) 

 140 Broadway 

 New York, New York 10005 

 Telephone: 212-907-0700 

 Facsimile: 212-818-0477 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Capitalia Asset 

 Management SGR S.p.A. and Capitalia 

 Investment Management S.A. 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 10 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on September 28, 2007, I caused the foregoing Notice of Appearance to 

be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court through the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will 

send notification of such public filing to all counsel registered to receive such notice, and to be sent 

by U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, to the following counsel: 

Michael T. Reynolds 

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 

Worldwide Plaza 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Michael J. Malone 

King & Spalding LLP 

1185 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Michael E. Swartz, Esq. 

Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP 

919 Third Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

 /s/ David J. Goldsmith 

David J. Goldsmith (DG-7388) 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 10 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 58 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 58 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 58 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### CHARLOTTE L. KELMAN *v.*DAVID A. KELMAN

*Kenneth J. Bartschi, Wesley W. Horton*and *Ronald Crawley,*certified legal intern, in support of the petition.

*Edith F. McClure,*in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 120 (AC 24822), is denied.

BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

Appellate case name: Brandy Brenay Charles and Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 311

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 1 7

- 02559J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

On March 2 2, 201 9 , appell ants Brandy Brenay Charles and Ronald Dwayne

Whitfield filed a pro se “ Motion f o r Stay of Mandate (for time for nunc pro tunc hearing, fraud upon the court, both in this court and in the trial court) ” in this case and the related appellate cause number 01

- 18

- 00485

- CV. With respect to this case, this Court’s judgment

was issued on May 8, 2018, and our mandate was issued on Decem ber 20, 2018.

However, this Court’s mandate had already issued on December 20, 2018, before this motion to stay the mandate was filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.2 (“[a] party may move to stay issuance of the mandate pending the United States Supreme Court’s disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari”). Accordingly, appell ants’ “Motion for Stay of Mandate (for time for nunc pro tunc hearing, fraud upon t he court, both in this court and in the trial court)” is dismissed as moot.

It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Justice Laura C. Higley

____ ________
x Acting individually Acting for the Panel
Date: ___ March 28, 2019

______
## Breadcrumb

-  News 

Breadcrumb-  News 

##   Congratulations to the 2024 CDI Awarded Projects

      By Community for Data Integration (CDI)      March 13, 2024    

The Community for Data Integration announces eleven proposals to be supported in FY2024. This year’s request for proposals focused on the themes of advancing open science and implementing the USGS Data Strategy.

**Building a roadmap to integrate freshwater wetlands into the National Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventory**Sheel Bansal

**Beginners Git, GitLab & Software Release Carpentries-like Training for USGS Personnel to Facilitate Open Science**Saira Haider

**Making water tracing rock solid: national, geologic map-based visualization of USGS water strontium isotope data**Adam M Hudson

**Expansion of the Geophysical Survey (GS) data standard and open-source tools**Stephanie R James

**Enhancing ArcGIS Survey123 to improve rangeland and aquatic data collection**Susan K Kemp

**SeeOtter: Improving software for AI-assisted processing of imagery for wildlife surveys**Nicole L LaRoche

**3DEPPCC: An automated DL-based point cloud classification tool on 3DEP point clouds**Jung-kuan Liu

**Low Distortion Map Projections for the Artemis III Candidate Landing Sites **Mark T McClernan

**USGS Data in K-12 Education: Inspiring Future Scientists**Emily E Sesno

**A National Tool for Graphing and Synthesizing Continuous and Discrete Water-Quality Data**Kimberly H Shaffer

**Developing Inter-agency Templates for FAIR genetic data archiving  **Amy G Vandergast

### Get Our News

These items are in the RSS feed format (Really Simple Syndication) based on categories such as topics, locations, and more. You can install and RSS reader browser extension, software, or use a third-party service to receive immediate news updates depending on the feed that you have added. If you click the feed links below, they may look strange because they are simply XML code. An RSS reader can easily read this code and push out a notification to you when something new is posted to our site.

RSS Icon**

Community for Data Integration (CDI) News

RSS Icon**

Information Systems News
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60638

Summary Calendar

GODSON SHARK-DURU,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A73 693 373

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Godson Shark-Duru, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions

for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision

denying his applications for cancellation of removal and voluntary

departure.

Shark-Daru argues that his due process rights were violated

when the IJ overstepped his role as adjudicator when he made

various statements and determinations concerning his credibility

and character. He also contends that the IJ’s discretionary
No. 06-60638

-2-

determination was an abuse of discretion that rose to the level of

a violation of his due process rights. He does not specifically

challenge the BIA’s decision, nor does he challenge the IJ’s

determination that he did not show hardship that was sufficient to

merit cancellation of removal. 

The BIA conducted its own review of the record and did not

adopt the IJ’s decision, and thus this court does not have

authority to review the IJ’s decision. See Girma v. INS, 283 F.3d

664, 666 (5th Cir. 2002). Because Shark-Duru challenges only

statements and determinations by the IJ that this court lacks

authority to review and does not challenge any of the BIA’s

determinations, he has abandoned the only issues before this court.

See Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607, 612-13 (5th Cir. 1999).

Accordingly, Shark-Duru has not shown any error in the BIA’s

dismissal, and his petition for review is DENIED.
Clear All

        25 March 2021    

#                     Iwo Jima ARG and 24th MEU Deploy After Redefining Integrated Training                 

                The Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) deployed March 25 after completing an intensive, month-long composite training exercise (COMPTUEX) and brief in-port maintenance period.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 31





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY





I, Peter J. Bergmann, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of YP Corp., certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of YP Corp.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  [Intentionally Omitted];





4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have;





a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);





a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: December 29, 2004
*/s/ Peter J. Bergmann*Peter J. Bergmann Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial Officer)
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1620 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 

reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1620 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Pro3 gram Reauthorization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PRO5 GRAM. 

6 Section 117(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

7 Act (33 U.S.C. 1267(j)) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘$40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2005’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘$90,000,000 for fiscal year 2021, 

10 $90,500,000 for fiscal year 2022, $91,000,000 for fiscal 

11 year 2023, $91,500,000 for fiscal year 2024, and 

12 $92,000,000 for fiscal year 2025’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS