alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~- ~~~~- - ~ 

215 Madison Avenue New York New York 113111 i r [?!>I 889-6565 * Fax (2121 779-8208 r wwws~hwartzandperr~, corn 

Murrdy Schwartr 

Dav~da S Perry' 

Br~an Heller 

Ronald S. Solow' 

Of ir>uniel 

MatthewT Schatz 

Klrsten lanien 

'Also adm~tted ir MA 

3 

. SI..ECI%ONICALLY mLED 

'llso adnlltted in D C 

'Admitted in D C and CA 

. DaTE FLLED: .. . ...*.- . . 

April 25, 2008 

- Via Federal Express 

Honorable Miriam Cedarbaum 

United States District Court 

Southern District of New York 

500 Pearl Street 

New York.New York 10007-1312 

MEMO ENDOASEO 

Re: DeNardi v. DRA Imapir~g, P.C. and Imaging Support Servicev, LLC 

Docket #: 07 Civ, 5791 (MGC) 

Dear Judge C'edarbauin: 

Our office reprrsents the Plaintiffin :he above-reterenced matter. This letter is written with 

the knowledge, consent and approval of counsel for Dzfecdants. 

The discovery deadline in this case is c.arrently scheduled for May 30, 2008 and the parties 

have been working diligently to meet it. At this point, the parties' initial document reqllests have 

bccncompleted. as well as Plaintiffs deposition. Plaintiff was initially deposed on March 20.2008 

for approximately 7 hours. At the en6 of the deposition. defense ccunsel indicated that hc rcquirzd 

additional time to completc the depositionand afterco~isidering the issue, Plaintiffvoluntar~ly agreeti 

to appear on anather datc. Plaintiff's deposition was conlplered on April 2211d. 

On April 231d, Plaintiff served a 2nd Xotice tr, ?rodxe seeking certa~ri specific documents 

that relate to certain relcvant subjccts that came ~p during Plaintiffs dcpsition. I)efendant's 

production response is returnable at the end of May, just prior to the disco\.ery cut-off. Plaintiff 

erpccts to ,~sc these documents during ;he two depositions ofthe Defendants' witnesses, which the 

parties areprescntly attempting to schedule. Since Plaintiff daes not expect to reccivc the documents 

Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 11 Filed 04/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
HWARTZ 

until just before the current discovery cut-off, the parties will be unable to schedule the two 

depositions ofDefendants' wit~~esses within the allotted time period. Additionally, Defe~ldanls havc 

indicated that they expect to take the depositions of several non-party witnesses and Plaintiff has 

agreed to assist in the scheduling of those witnesses to the extent possible so that there will be no 

need for Defendants to serve subpoenas. 

Accordingly, the parties most respectfully request an adjournment ofthe discovery cut-off 

to July 3 1,2008 and the joint pre-trial order to September 30, 2008. 1 

'lhe parties remain. of course: available to speak with the Court by telephone, should the 

Court desire to do so. This is the parties' first request for such reliefin this case and the parties fully 

believe that they will be able to complete all remaining discovery within the requested time period. 

We thank the Cuurl for its consideration of this matter 

DSPIarp 

cc: Keane 8( Beane (Att: Lance Klein. Esq.) 

Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 11 Filed 04/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.2


























CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the “
Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
C. Benoit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   David
C. Benoit


David C.
Benoit


Chief
Financial Officer


March 15,
2010
# EUR-Lex - 52004SC0223 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004SC0223

**Commission opinion under the second paragraph of Article 245 of the EC Treaty on the requests for amendment of Article 29 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice and Article 35 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, presented by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance in accordance with Article 64 of the Statute of the Court of Justice /* SEC/2004/0223 final */ **

*

*

COMMISSION OPINION under the second paragraph of Article 245 of the EC Treaty on the requests for amendment of Article 29 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice and Article 35 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, presented by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance in accordance with Article 64 of the Statute of the Court of Justice

The purpose of the amendments requested by the Court of Justice [1] and the Court of First Instance [2] is to add the new official languages of the enlarged Union to their lists of procedural languages and to reproduce in the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance the provisions of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice governing procedural languages in the direct actions that are now to be within the jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance under the distribution of jurisdiction in the process of being adopted by the Council.

[1] Doc. 15167/03 JUR 452 COUR 31.

[2] Doc. 15738/03 JUR 468 COUR 33.

These purely technical amendments call for no comments from the Commission.

The Commission accordingly agrees to the texts presented by the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance.
#### WHITE et al., Respondents, v. BARNARD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by William B. White and another against Mignon C. Barnard. R. S. Redfleld, for respondents.

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs of motion to abide event.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. B AO ZHONG W

ANG, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-10026

D.C . No. 1:14-c r-00007-R VM
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of the Northe rn M ariana Isla nds Ale xR . M unson, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. B a o Zhong W ang a

p pe a l s from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c h a lle nge s his guilty -ple a c o nvic tion a nd 30-m onth se nte nc e for distribution of
m e tha m phe tam ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . § 841(a )(1), (b)(1)(C ). Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), W ang’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating 

# FIL ED JAN 25 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).that

the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

wa s c ounse l of
re c o rd. W ang file d two pro sele tte rs, whic h we tre at a s W ang’ s pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No a nswe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. W ang wa ive d his right to a ppe a l his c onvic tion a

nd se nte nc e . Our inde pe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to P e n son v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to the va lidity of the wa ive r. Se e Unite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dism iss the a ppe a l. Se e id. at 988. To the e xte nt tha

t W ang se e ks to ra ise a

c la im of ine ffe c tive a s sista

n c e of
c ounse l, we de c line to a d d re ss this issue

on dire c t a

ppe a l. Se e Unite d State

s v . Rahman , 642 F.3d 1257, 1259-60 (9th C ir. 2011). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D.

1 5
- 1 0 0 2 6 2
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 43 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Almond, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to sever his trial from that of his codefendant. "Where proof against the defendants is supplied by the same evidence, only the most cogent reasons warrant a severance” *(People v Bornholdt,*33 NY2d 75, 87). The basis of defendant’s motion was that an antagonistic defense might arise at trial. "[Severance is not required solely because of hostility between the defendants, differences in their trial strategies or inconsistencies in their defenses. It must appear that a joint trial necessarily will, or did, result in unfair prejudice to the moving party and substantially impair his defense” *(People v Cruz,*66 NY2d 61, 73-74, *revd on other grounds*481 US 186). "[Severance is compelled where the core of each defense is in irreconcilable conflict with the other and where there is a significant danger, as both defenses are portrayed to the trial court, that the conflict alone would lead the jury to infer defendant’s guilt” *(People v Mahbouhian,*74 NY2d 174, 184). We conclude that defendant has failed to show that the joint trial resulted in unfair prejudice to him and that it substantially impaired his defense or that the conflict in defenses alone would lead the jury to infer defendant’s guilt.

The court did not err in receiving into evidence money taken from defendant at the time of his arrest. Without objection, the arresting officer testified that he found a substantial amount of money on defendant’s person and also, without objection, he identified the money, stated that it totaled $2,449 and gave the denomination of each of the bills. Finally, without objection, he showed the money to the jury. On cross-examination, defense counsel elicited evidence that defendant had a legitimate reason for possession of the money —that he was taking it to the bank to pay off a loan. At the conclusion of the People’s case, the People offered the money *975into evidence. Because this testimony about the money was received without objection, the court properly overruled defendant’s general objection to the receipt of the money into evidence.

None of the alleged acts of prosecutorial misconduct were objected to and thus have not been preserved for review as a matter of law, and we decline to exercise our power to review them in the interest of justice.

We have reviewed the other issues raised by defendant on appeal and we find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — criminal possession of controlled substance, third degree.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 45 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 45 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement No. 333-118857 on Form S-3 and Registration
Statements No. 333-69103 and 333-63913 on Form S-8 of Baylake Corp. of our
report dated March 1, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Baylake Corp. and the effectiveness of Baylake Corp.’s internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Baylake
Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 1, 2011

102

---
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0395 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0395

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an integrated action programme in the field of lifelong learning (COM(2004)0474 - C6-0095/2004 - 2004/0153(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 272 E , 09/11/2006 P. 0178 - 0179 *

P6_TA(2005)0395

Lifelong learning ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an integrated action programme in the field of lifelong learning (COM(2004)0474 — C6-0095/2004 — 2004/0153(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0474) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 149(4) and 150(4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0095/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions [1],

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (A6-0267/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Points out that the appropriations indicated in the Commission proposal beyond the year 2006 are subject to the decisions to be taken on the next multiannual financial framework;

3. Calls on the Commission, once the next multiannual financial framework is adopted, to present, if appropriate, a proposal to adjust the financial reference amount of the programme;

4. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 530.

#### John J. Hemphill and Kenneth S. Murchison, Appellants, *v.*The United States and The Cherokee Nation.

Appeal from the Court of Claims. November 2, 1908. Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellants. *Mr. John J.-Hemphill*for appellants. *The Attorney General*for appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Annual Report of Pogo Producing Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003
(the "Report"), I, Paul G. Van Wagenen, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



| |  | /S/ PAUL G. VAN WAGENENPaul G. Van Wagenen
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February
24, 2004

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-389-022]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate 
Filing

May 3, 2001.

    Take notice that on April 27, 2001, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing to the Commission the 
following contract for disclosure of a recently negotiated rate 
transaction:


FTS-1 Service Agreement No. 70403 between Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company and Cinergy Marketing & Trading, L.L.C. dated April 18, 2001

    Transportation service which is scheduled to commence May 1, 2001.
    Columbia Gulf states that copies of the filing have been served on 
all parties on the official service list created by the Secretary in 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11660 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED May 31, 1999.


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Aug-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               May-31-1999
<CASH>                                            2915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2915
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         20435
<OTHER-SE>                                      (17967)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3110
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1471)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.001)



</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 15 Filed 08/06/2008 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 ROCK-TENN COMPANY
 SUBSIDIARIES OF ROCK-TENN COMPANY
 Alliance Display, LLC
    
    DelawareAlliance Display Company of Canada
    
    Nova Scotia, CanadaDominion Paperboard Products Ltd.
    
    Quebec, CanadaFold-Pak, LLC
    
    DelawareGroupe Cartem Wilco Inc.
    
    Quebec, CanadaLing Industries, Inc.
    
    Quebec, CanadaLing Quebec, Inc.
    
    Quebec, CanadaPCPC, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaRock-Tenn Canada Holdings II, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Canada Holdings, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Company of Canada
    
    Nova Scotia, CanadaRock-Tenn Company of Canada II
    
    Nova Scotia, CanadaRock-Tenn Company of Canada III
    
    Nova Scotia, CanadaRock-Tenn Company of Texas
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Company, Mill Division, LLC
    
    TennesseeRock-Tenn Converting Company
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Financial, Inc.
    
    DelawareRock-Tenn Leasing Company, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Mill Company, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Packaging and Paperboard, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Packaging Company
    
    DelawareRock-Tenn Partition Company
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Real Estate, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Services Inc.
    
    GeorgiaRock-Tenn Shared Services, LLC
    
    GeorgiaRTS Embalajes de Argentina
    
    ArgentinaRTS Embalajes De Chile Limitada
    
    ChileRTS Empaques, S. De R.L. de CV
    
    MexicoRTS Packaging Foreign Holdings, LLC
    
    GeorgiaWaldorf Corporation
    
    DelawareWilco Inc.
    
    Quebec, Canada
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 16-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 16-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 16-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 16-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 16-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 5 of 5
Clear All

        02 February 2024    

                    U.S. Navy Installations, Fleet Commands Participate in Annual Force Protection Exercise                 
                WASHINGTON - Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) and Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC) will conduct their annual two-part force protection exercise, Citadel Shield-Solid Curtain (CS-SC24), beginning Feb. 5 at all Navy installations located in the continental United States.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website