alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AT JUNE 30, 1998 AND DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,292,017
<SECURITIES>                                37,692,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                  203,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,400
<INVENTORY>                                    331,416
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,737,334
<PP&E>                                      34,575,321
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,596,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              80,738,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,509,629
<BONDS>                                     70,619,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       40,540,009
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,318
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                80,738,845
<SALES>                                      3,709,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,709,199
<CGS>                                        6,645,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,645,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,941,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,241,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (16,979,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (16,979,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (16,979,465)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    3.930
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    3.930
        

</TABLE>
Richard S. Mills, Esq. (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson, Esq. (JPC-9391)

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE 

LITIGATION

21 MC 102 (AKH)

SUSANA RODRIGUEZ (and HUSBAND, 

JOSE RODRIGUEZ), 

 Plaintiffs, -against- 150 BROADWAY CORP., ET AL., 

 Defendants.

INDEX NO.: 07-CV-05315 (AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF AMBIENT 

GROUP, INC. S ANSWER

TO MASTER COMPLAINT

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., by its attorneys, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, as and for its Response to the allegations set forth 

in the Amended Complaint by Adoption (Amended Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master

Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, hereby adopts its Answer to Master Complaint

dated August 2, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In Re World Trade Center Lower

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, the defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., demands judgment dismissing

the above-captioned action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such

other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 37 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: New York, New York

May 13, 2008 

Yours etc., 

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc. 

By:_ s/ John P. Cookson ____________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483.9490

TO: Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

(212) 267.3700

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

(212) 553.9206

James E. Tyrrell, Jr., Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza

Newark, New Jersey 07102

(973) 848.5600

Thomas A. Egan, Esq.

Fleming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006-1404

(212) 412.9500

Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 37 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 13

th day of May 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER BY DEFENDANT AMBIENT GROUP, INC., 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which sends notification to 

appearing parties.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP

By: s/ John P. Cookson ____________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 37 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH     Document 21      Filed 10/25/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH     Document 21      Filed 10/25/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH     Document 21      Filed 10/25/2007     Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JENNIFER VARQUEZ AND WILLIAM 

VARQUEZ, W/H,

Petitioners

v.

DR. PAUL BRITT, DDS AND THE 

COMMONS AT THORNBURY, UNIT 

OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND CMCM 

ASSOCIATES, LP,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 348 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Clear All

        20 September 2022    

                    Norway Prime Minister, Minister of Defense, SECNAV Visit USS Gerald R. Ford                 
                Prime Minister of Norway Jonas Gahr Støre, Norway’s Minister of Defense Bjørn Arild Gram, and the U.S. Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro visited the first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) Sept. 19, 2022.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1073 KAH 13-00252**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. RENE PETERSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICIA E. LECONEY, SUPERINTENDENT, CAPE VINCENT CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (OWEN DEMUTH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered September 24, 2012 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment that denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appeal has been rendered moot by petitioner’s release to parole supervision ( see People ex rel. Baron v New York State Dept. of Corrections , 94 AD3d 1410, 1410, lv denied 19 NY3d 807), and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply ( see id. ; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne , 50 NY2d 707, 714-715). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to exercise our power to convert the habeas corpus proceeding into a CPLR article 78 proceeding ( see People ex rel. Keyes v Khahaifa , 101 AD3d 1665, 1665, lv denied 20 NY3d 862).

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit








AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO THE
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.
CASH DEFERRAL PLAN


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) have previously approved the Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Cash Deferral Plan, as amended (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of Plan, the Board is empowered to amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Company wishes to provide opportunities to participate in the Plan to eligible service providers who provide service to certain of the Company’s subsidiaries as set forth in this Amendment #2 to the Plan (the “Amendment”).


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows effective as of the date hereof:
 
1.Section 2.23 in the Plan’s adoption agreement (the “Adoption Agreement”) is hereby amended and restated, which shall read in its entirety as follows:


“2.23 Participating Employer(s): As of December 13, 2019, the following Participating Employer(s) are parties to the Plan:


	
				
	Name of Employer
	Address
	Telephone No.
	EIN

	Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
	1 Cedar Brook Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512
	609-662-2000
	71-0869350

	Amicus Therapeutics US, Inc.
	1 Cedar Brook Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512
	609-662-2000
	82-3160503

	Amicus Biologics, Inc.
	1 Cedar Brook Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512
	609-662-2000
	83-0932048






2.Except as specifically provided in and modified by this Amendment, the Plan and the Adoption Agreement are in all other respects hereby ratified and confirmed and references to the Plan and the Adoption Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Plan and the Adoption Agreement as modified by this Amendment.


3.The Authorized Officers (John Crowley, Bradley Campbell, Ellen Rosenberg, Daphne Quimi) be, and each of them hereby is, authorized, directed and empowered on behalf of the Company to (a) make, enter into, execute, deliver, file and record any and all documents, agreements, certificates and instruments, (b) pay or cause to be paid any and all expenses and fees and disburse such other funds of the Company, and (c) take any and all such other actions as 













any such Authorized Officer or Authorized Officers may determine in his, her or their discretion to be necessary or advisable to effectuate the foregoing resolutions, the taking of any such action to constitute conclusive evidence of the exercise of such discretionary authority and that any and all actions taken by the Authorized Officers prior to the date hereof in connection with, and consistent with, the foregoing resolutions are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed in all respects.
    


2









To record the adoption of this Amendment #2, to the Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Cash Deferral Plan, the Company has caused its authorized officer to affix its corporate name this 13th day of December, 2019.


AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.




By:                          
                             







3
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 11 Filed 07/24/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 11 Filed 07/24/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 11 Filed 07/24/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05777-DC Document 11 Filed 07/24/2008 Page 4 of 4
##### 



[KPMG LLP
 KPMG LLP
    
    Telephone
    
    412 391 9710Suite 2500
    
    Fax
    
    412 391 8963One Mellon Center
    
    Internet
    
    www.us.kpmg.comPittsburgh, PA 15219-2598
 Independent Accountants Report




---



##### 



Management Report on AFCO Credit Corporations and AFCO Acceptance Corporations Compliance, as
Servicer, with the Servicing Requirements of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
     /s/ Bruce R. Gold
  - 2 -




---



##### 



Management Report on AFCO Credit Corporations and AFCO Acceptance Corporations Compliance, as
Servicer, with the Servicing Requirements of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
     /s/ James L. Jourdain
  - 3 -
Clear All

        13 February 2024    

                    Forward Deployable Preventative Medical Unit Enhances Combat Effectiveness with Comprehensive Weapons and Threat Recognition Training                 
                SUFFOLK, Va. - This year, the Forward Deployable Preventative Medical Unit (FDPMU) participated in a first ever Weapons and Threat Recognition Training Course, specifically designed and tailored for the unit’s unique mission. FDPMU’s are rapidly, deployable, and mobile units that support force            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-50,777-07
IN RE DENNIS WAYNE JACK SON, AKA EDD IE BARTIE , Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. W84-71431-V IN THE 292ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the District Court of Dallas County on Marc h 3, 1988 , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et been forwa rded to this Court. This Court has rec eived and ruled on two other habea s applications perta ining to this conviction under writ numbers WR -14,996-01 and -02, but neither w as filed in the tria l court on the da te spec ified by

Relator. In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Dallas County , is or dere d to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s2

corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed o rder which desig nates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus i n Da l l as C o unty
. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date t h e d i s t ri ct attorney ’s office was
serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitted with the re sponse. This application for l ea v e to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitt ed t h e appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: 05/18/16 Do not publish
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04418-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/19/2008 Page 16 of 16
Clear All

        18 August 2023    

                    Keel Authenticated for Future USS Tang (SSN 805)                 
                GROTON, Conn. – Senior Navy leaders and shipbuilders gathered at General Dynamics Electric Boat shipyard in Groton, Connecticut, to attend a keel-laying ceremony for the future Virginia-class submarine USS Tang (SSN 805), Aug. 17.The keel laying ceremony signifies a major milestone in the life of a            

        02 August 2023    

                    Navy Lays Keel for Future USS Oklahoma (SSN 802)                 
                NEWPORT NEWS, Va. (Aug. 2, 2023) – Senior Navy leaders and shipbuilders gathered at HII-Newport News Shipbuilding (NNS) Wednesday, Aug. 2, to attend a keel-laying authentication for the future Virginia-class submarine USS Oklahoma (SSN 802).            

        29 November 2022    

                    Navy Hosts First Welding Competition, Career Discovery Event for Virginia Talent Pipeline Program                 
                HAMPTON, Va. – Nearly 300 students, representing 18 training providers, participated in the Virginia Talent Pipeline Project’s (VA TPP) inaugural Project MFG Welding Competition and Career Discovery Day at the Virginia Peninsula Community College, in Hampton, Va., Nov. 16.            

        21 November 2022    

                    Navy Lays Keel for Future USS Arkansas (SSN 800)                 
                NEWPORT NEWS, Va. – Senior Navy leaders, members of Congress, and shipbuilders gathered at Newport News Shipyard (NNSY) today to attend a keel-laying ceremony for the future Virginia-class submarine USS Arkansas (SSN 800), Nov. 19.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 

CAPITALIA ASSET MANAGEMENT SGR S.p.A. 

and CAPITALIA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT 

S.A., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

VIVENDI, S.A., JEAN-MARIE MESSIER 

and GUILLAUME HANNEZO, 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 07 Civ. 5742 (RJH) 

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF 

FIRM NAME AND ADDRESS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that effective September 1, 2007, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff 

LLP has changed its name and its office has relocated from 100 Park Avenue, New York, New York 

10017, as follows: 

Labaton Sucharow LLP 

140 Broadway 

New York, New York 10005 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that all other contact information for the undersigned 

and other Labaton Sucharow LLP attorneys remains unchanged. All further pleadings and 

correspondence in this action should be sent to this address. 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 11 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 3
2 

Dated: New York, New York Respectfully submitted, 

September 28, 2007 

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

 By: /s/ Russel N. Jacobson__ 

 Russel N. Jacobson (RJ-2268) 

 David J. Goldsmith (DG-7388) 

 140 Broadway 

 New York, New York 10005 

 Telephone: 212-907-0700 

 Facsimile: 212-818-0477 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Capitalia Asset 

 Management SGR S.p.A. and Capitalia 

 Investment Management S.A. 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 11 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 2 of 3
3 

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on September 28, 2007, I caused the foregoing Notice of Change of Firm 

Name and Address to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court through the Court’s 

CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such public filing to all counsel registered to 

receive such notice, and to be sent by U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, to the following counsel: 

Michael T. Reynolds 

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 

Worldwide Plaza 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Michael J. Malone 

King & Spalding LLP 

1185 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Michael E. Swartz, Esq. 

Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP 

919 Third Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

 /s/ David J. Goldsmith 

David J. Goldsmith (DG-7388) 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 11 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered March 4, 1983, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 4 to 8 years.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant challenges his 1974 conviction which served as a predicate for his adjudication as a second felony offender, claiming that he was entitled to an adjudication of his youthful offender status. The defense counsel affirmatively asserted at sentencing on the instant conviction that neither the defendant nor his counsel requested youthful offender treatment upon his sentencing in the 1974 case. The granting of youthful offender treatment is discretionary *(see, People v Williams,*124 AD2d 615, *lv denied*69 NY2d 751; *People v Selg,*110 AD2d 918). Thus, by virtue of his failure to assert such a claim at the time of sentencing on the 1974 conviction, the issue was waived *(see, e.g., People v McGowen,*42 NY2d 905, *rearg denied*42 NY2d 1015; *People v Di Marcantonio,*117 AD2d 612, 613, *lv denied*67 NY2d 882; *People v Busuttil,*115 AD2d 655). In any event, the defendant should have sought review of the issue by means of a direct appeal *(see, People v Ferguson,*119 AD2d 338, 343-344, *lv denied*69 NY2d 711).

The defendant also challenges, for the first time on appeal, the constitutionality of his 1974 conviction, and also of his 1976 conviction which was cited in the People’s predicate felony statement. Having failed to demonstrate good cause for failing to controvert the constitutionality of the 1974 conviction upon his sentencing in 1976, the defendant has waived any allegation of the unconstitutionality thereof *(see,*CPL 400.21; *People v Oliver,*63 NY2d 973; *People v Mumit,*106 AD2d 411, 412). Furthermore, because the defendant did not seek review of his adjudication as a second felony offender in *8721976 by direct appeal or appropriate postjudgment motion, he must be deemed to have waived that issue *(see,*CPL 400.21; *People v Loughlin,*66 NY2d 633, 635-636; *People v Morcilio,*91 AD2d 1074).

Lastly, the defendant’s claim that his adjudication as a second felony offender violates the prohibition against ex post facto laws contained in US Constitution, article I, § 10 has also not been preserved for appellate review as the issue was not raised before the sentencing court *(see,*CPL 470.05; *People v Lemon,*62 NY2d 745; *People v Baynard,*110 AD2d 650). We perceive no reason to reach the claim in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see, People v Morse,*62 NY2d 205, 216-218; *People v Baynard, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contention is not preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636) and we perceive no reason to reach it in the interest of justice. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.