alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTEDOPTIONAL
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>



<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                              299,276
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        85,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                         448,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    895,145
<PP&E>                                            3,151,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2,497,502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,572,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,249,774
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             32,031
<OTHER-SE>                                          (46,885)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,572,865
<SALES>                                           1,100,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,194,235
<CGS>                                               239,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,375,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  138,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (319,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3,281
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (322,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (322,812)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.13)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

**AMENDMENT NO. 2TOEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

            This Amendment No. 2  (this  “Amendment’) dated as of January 1, 2004, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), and Charles N. Martin, Jr. (the “Executive”).

**            WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Employment  Agreement  dated as of June 1, 1998, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of May 31, 2001 ( as so amended,the “EA”), to secure the services of the Executive as its Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; and

**            WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $990,000, effective as of January 1, 2004.

**            NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:

            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided inthe EA.

            2.         Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby deleted and replaced with thefollowing new Section 6(a):

                        “(a).  *Base Salary.*  The Executive’s base salary hereunder, from July 1, 2001 to December 31,2003, shall be $900,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. Effective January 1, 2004, the Executive’s base salary hereunder shall be $990,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. The Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustment fromtime to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”

            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive.

----

**- 2 -**

****

            **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by  its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year firstset forth above.

                                                                                   **Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**

                                                                                   By:       /s/ Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                                                         Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                               Executive Vice President

                                                                                   **Executive**:

**                                                                                   **/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                                 **                                                                                   **Charles N. Martin, Jr.
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
EX-10.35.1



 






Exhibit 10.35.1









December 20, 2005




Caroline B. Manogue

100 Endo Boulevard

Chadds Ford, PA 19317



Dear Caroline:




     Reference is hereby made to that certain amended and restated employment agreement, dated as
of September 1, 2002 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”), between you and Endo Pharmaceuticals
Holdings Inc. (the “Company”). Terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.



     Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Employment Agreement, the Company hereby informs you that it
wishes to renew the Employment Agreement for an additional period of one year. If you are in
agreement, the Employment Period shall now cease on December 31, 2006, unless otherwise modified in
accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement. In addition, Section 3.1(a) shall hereby be
amended to change the definition of Salary to $351,750. Finally, the references to twelve (12)
months in the following sections of the Employment Agreement shall be changed to eighteen (18)
months: Sections 6.5(a), 6.5(c) and 6.6 and Article 8.



     All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect. If you are in agreement with this renewal, which shall be effective as of the date first
above written, please execute below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Peter A. Lankau
 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Peter A. Lankau

President & Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED THIS 20th DAY OF DECEMBER 2005:



/s/ Caroline B. Manogue



Caroline B. Manogue
Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
DOCSNY-265949v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

SONIA GARCIA AND CHRISTIAN CHAVEZ, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

90 CHURCH STREET 

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05358-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-265949v01 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1699 

To amend the Virgin Islands of the United States Centennial Commission 

Act to extend the expiration date of the Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2019 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Virgin Islands of the United States Centennial 

Commission Act to extend the expiration date of the 

Commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVIVAL OF VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED 

4 STATES CENTENNIAL COMMISSION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Virgin Islands of the United 

6 States Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 114–224) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) in section 7(b)— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1699 IH

1 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

2 by striking ‘‘January 31, 2018’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘January 31, 2020’’; 

4 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

5 and inserting a semicolon; 

6 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking the pe7 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(3) any other information that the Commis10 sion considers to be appropriate.’’; and 

11 (2) by amending section 10 to read as follows: 

12 ‘‘SEC. 10. TERMINATION. 

13 ‘‘The Commission shall terminate 30 days after sub14 mitting the final report described under section 7(b).’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect on September 29, 2018. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, David H. Bateman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation.





Date: March 4, 2011
By:
/s/ David H. BatemanDavid H. BatemanChief Executive Officer





I, Paul L. Dailey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation.





Date: March 4, 2011
By:
/s/ Paul L. DaileyPaul L. DaileyChief Financial Officer





The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
                 
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                                       0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         0
<LOANS>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               0
<DEPOSITS>                                   0
<SHORT-TERM>                                 0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          0
<LONG-TERM>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               0
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               0
<LOANS-NON>                                  0
<LOANS-PAST>                                 0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                0
<RECOVERIES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-405-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 8, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 4, 2001, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing to be part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets, to be 
effective June 4, 2001.
    Natural states that the purpose of this filing is to revise Rate 
Schedule DSS and the in-ground transfer provisions of the General Terms 
and Conditions of Natural's Tariff to provide Shippers under Rate 
Schedule DDS with greater injection flexibility.
    Natural states that copies of the filing have been mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(l)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11981 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1250 KA 13-01951
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIS KNIGHT, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a resentence of the Monroe County Court (John Lewis DeMarco, J.), rendered September 6, 2013. Defendant was resentenced following his conviction, upon a plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a resentence following his conviction upon a plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that County Court erred in resentencing him as a second violent felony offender and that the resentence is unduly harsh and severe. We reject those contentions. We note at the outset that the posthearing loss of the exhibits that were submitted at the predicate felony hearing, including the certificate of conviction from the predicate felony offense, does not deprive defendant of his right to appellate review of these issues. At the hearing, defense counsel did not object to the admission in evidence of the certificate of conviction, and there is no dispute that the certificate of conviction bore defendant’s name and date of birth and was therefore “sufficient to establish that defendant was previously convicted of [the predicate] crime” ( People v Switzer , 55 AD3d 1394, 1395, lv denied 11 NY3d 858; see People v Rattelade , 226 AD2d 1107, 1107-1108, lv denied 88 NY2d 992). Inasmuch as “the information in the missing [certificate of conviction] can be gleaned from the record and there is no dispute with respect to the accuracy of that information,” we conclude that there is sufficient information to allow for effective appellate review of defendant’s contention ( People v Jackson , 11 AD3d 928, 930, lv denied 3 NY3d 757; see generally People v Yavru-Sakuk , 98 NY2d 56, 60). Based on the record, we conclude that the People established beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was a second violent felony offender ( see People v Kinnear
,-2- 1250 KA 13-01951

78 AD3d 1593, 1594). We further conclude that the resentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the
" Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David C. Benoit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ David C. Benoit
-------------------
David C. Benoit
Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2003
Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 22 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 22 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 22 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
# C_2009245DE.01004201.xml

| 13.10.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 245/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 245/42

---

Berichtigung der Veröffentlichung eines Antrags nach Artikel 6 Absatz 2 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 510/2006 des Rates zum Schutz von geografischen Angaben und Ursprungsbezeichnungen für Agrarerzeugnisse und Lebensmittel

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 72 vom 26. März 2009
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 72 vom 26. März 2009

2009/C 245/12

Auf Seite 63, Punkt 4.2.1, dritter Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

| „— | Salz, Zucker, Gewürze, Zusatzstoffe (solche, die nach der Europäischen Richtlinie aus dem Jahr 1995 über andere Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe als künstliche Farbstoffe zugelassen sind, Getreidemehle oder jeder andere Stabilisator oder jedes andere Verdickungsmittel, natürliche oder künstliche Senföle, ätherischer Senfextrakt oder ätherisches Senföl).“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

Salz, Zucker, Gewürze, Zusatzstoffe (solche, die nach der Europäischen Richtlinie aus dem Jahr 1995 über andere Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe als künstliche Farbstoffe zugelassen sind, Getreidemehle oder jeder andere Stabilisator oder jedes andere Verdickungsmittel, natürliche oder künstliche Senföle, ätherischer Senfextrakt oder ätherisches Senföl).“

muss es heißen:

| „— | Salz, Zucker, Gewürze, Zusatzstoffe (solche, die nach der Europäischen Richtlinie aus dem Jahr 1995 über Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe zugelassen sind, ausgenommen künstliche Farbstoffe, Getreidemehle oder jeder andere Stabilisator oder jedes andere Verdickungsmittel, natürliche oder künstliche Senföle, Senfextrakt oder ätherisches Senföl).“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

Salz, Zucker, Gewürze, Zusatzstoffe (solche, die nach der Europäischen Richtlinie aus dem Jahr 1995 über Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe zugelassen sind, ausgenommen künstliche Farbstoffe, Getreidemehle oder jeder andere Stabilisator oder jedes andere Verdickungsmittel, natürliche oder künstliche Senföle, Senfextrakt oder ätherisches Senföl).“

---