alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001046131
<NAME> MIDAS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                          28,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,600
<INVENTORY>                                     61,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,700
<PP&E>                                         243,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,100
<BONDS>                                        110,600<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,800
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,600
<SALES>                                        275,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               275,600
<CGS>                                          147,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  220,400<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,700)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.82
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES: CAPITALIZED LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND LONG-TERM DEBT OF $9,400 AND
$101,200, RESPECTIVELY.
<F2>INCLUDES: COST OF GOODS SOLD AND S,G & A EXPENSES OF $147,900 AND $72,500,
RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Clear All

        05 April 2023    

                    USS Nitze Returns from Deployment                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) returned to its homeport of Naval Station Norfolk, April 5, 2023, following an eight-month deployment to the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operation.            

        20 October 2022    

                    CENTCOM Commander embarks USS West Virginia Ballistic Missile Submarine                 
                OMAN - On October 19th, General Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of CENTCOM, conducted a visit aboard the USS West Virginia, a U.S. Navy Ohio-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine at an undisclosed location at sea in international waters in the Arabian Sea.            

        03 October 2022    

                    USS Sioux City (LCS 11) returns from historic deployment through 5th and 6th Fleets                 
                NAVAL STATION MAYPORT, Fla. - The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Sioux City (LCS 11) returned to Naval Station Mayport, Florida, Oct. 2, following its historic five-month deployment to the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operations.            

        29 September 2022    

                    USS Delbert D. Black Seizes $10 Million in Drugs in Gulf of Oman                 
                MANAMA, Bahrain - A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer seized 7,200 kilograms of hashish worth an estimated $10 million from a fishing vessel transiting international waters in the Gulf of Oman, Sept. 28.            

        29 September 2022    

                    USS Nitze Welcomes New Captain During Ceremony at Sea                 
                MANAMA, Bahrain - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) welcomed a new commander during a change of command ceremony Sept. 28, while at sea in the Gulf of Aden.            

        12 September 2022    

                    5th Fleet Reserve Sailors complete maritime operations center exercise in Norfolk                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - Members of the 10 Navy Reserve units that support U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) and U.S. 5th Fleet completed a maritime operations center exercise Sept. 8-11 in Norfolk -- the third in a series of exercises developed by Reserve Sailors and hosted by Naval Warfare            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Order entered January 17, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01181-CR

No. 05-22-01182-CR

DEVYN KENARD COLEMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F21-57668, F21-76301

ORDER

The clerk’s records and reporter’s records for these cases are overdue.

Review of the Dallas County Clerk’s website shows appellant requested the clerk’s 

and reporter’s records on November 1, 2022. The clerk’s and reporter’s records 

were originally due December 4, 2022. On December 8, 2022, this Court notified 

Sharina Fowler, court reporter, and Dallas County District Clerk, Felicia Pitre, by 

postcard that the records were overdue and directed them to file the clerk’s records 
and reporter’s records by January 9, 2023. As of the date of this order, the clerk’s 

records and reporter’s records have not been filed. 

We ORDER Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, to file the clerk’s 

records for these cases by FEBRUARY 8, 2023.

We ORDER Sharina Fowler, court reporter, to file the reporter’s records for 

these cases by FEBRUARY 8, 2023.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Sharina Fowler, court 

reporter; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
Case 1:07-cr-00554-WHP Document 16 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT FORTHEDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGELA DENISE NAILS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,


### v. Civil Action No. KENNETH QUATTLEBAUM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED**JA~J** 

## 11 ?011 Clerk. US 01 t I 

## Courts tor

## tt,e**~fs~r};t** oBtanck'luptc y oumbla 

# 11 

# 0064

This matter comes before the Court onreview ofplaintiff's application to proceed in formapauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. In September 2010, plaintiffsubmitted a complaint which appears to be identical to the pleading submitted here, and the Court transferred that matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District ofAlabama. Nails v. Quattlebaum, No. 10-1584 (D.D.C. Sept. 20, 2010). That Court dismissed the case upon its determination that, by filing her complaint in the District ofColumbia, plaintiffwas attempting to circumvent an order which required a prefiling determination by ajudgebefore her case could proceed in the Northern District ofAlabama. Nails v. Quattlebaum, No. 1O-2743-S (N.D. Ala. Nov. 1,2010) (Order Dismissing Case Without Prejudice); see Nails v. ArborAcresApartments, No. 4:08-cv-1990 (N.D. Ala. Feb. 12, 2009) (Final Judgment Order directing the Clerk "to refrain from processing any new actionby Nails unless ajudge ofthis Court makes a pre-filing determinationthat the case has sufficient merit to be filed. Thus, any complaint submitted by
1Nails in the Northern District ofAlabama must, in the future, be submitted to ajudge ofthe court for a pre-filing determination that the case may proceed"). Itis apparent that venue in this district is improper for litigating the claims plaintiff raises because all the alleged events forming the basis ofher claims occurred in Alabama and because all the parties are located in Alabama. 

### See 28

## u.s.c. § 1391(b) (designating the proper venue under the circumstances presented as the location where the defendants are located or where a substantial part ofthe events occurred). Under 28 U

## .s.c. § 1406(a), ifa
case is filed in the wrong district, the court "shall dismiss, or ifit be in the interest ofjustice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought." Id. In light ofthe plaintiff's apparent attempt to bring claims against the same defendants arising from the
same facts as those set forth in her prior case, and in light ofthe plaintiff's apparent attempt to avoid the restrictions imposed onher ability to file cases in the Northern District of Alabama, it is not in the interest ofjustice to transfer this action. This action will be dismissed without prejudice. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

# !lM~c United States District Judge

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

MARIA DELACRUZ, 07-CV-5348 (AKH)

Plaintiff, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

-against80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel

for Defendants MAYORE ESTATES LLC, 80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC,

MAVORE ESTATES LLC, and 80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATION LLC, AS TENANTS

IN COMMON (MAYORE ESTATES/80 LAFAYETTE) for the building located at 22

Cortlandt Street (Subcellar Floors 1, 2, 3 and Floors 1, 2, 3), New York, New York 10007,

in the above-captioned action and all future correspondence and papers filed or serviced in

connection with the above-captioned action are to be directed to the undersigned.

Dated: New York, New York

September 11,2007

Yours etc.,

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

MAYORE ESTATES LLC, 80

LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC,

MAYORE ESTATES LLC, and 80

LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATION LLC, AS

TENANTS IN COMMON

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062)

Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
100 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

212 687-0100

212 687-0659 (Fax)

Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September II, 2007, 1 caused the following document

to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants Mayore Estates LLC, 80 Lafayette

Associates LLC, Mayore Estates LLC, and 80 Lafayette Association LLC, As Tenants In

Common.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintfs

Dated: September 11, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

1 Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

Is!

Stanley Goos

Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH Document 39 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH Document 39 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH Document 39 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 

PEDRO TAMAYO, 07-CV-01538 (AKH) 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

-againstNOTICE OF DEFENDANT VERIZON 

NEW YORK INC.’S ADOPTION OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

VERIZON NEW YORK INC., 

et al.

 

 

Defendants. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Verizon New York Inc. (“Verizon”) 

hereby adopts as its Answer in the instant case its Answer to Plaintiffs’ Master Complaint which 

was filed and served on October 16, 2007 in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower 

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). In accordance with Case Management 

Order No. 4, the allegations of the instant Check-Off Complaint are deemed to be denied. 

Verizon also incorporates by reference all averments and denials of its Answer to Plaintiffs’ 

Master Complaint as though same were more fully set forth herein at length. Verizon further 

adopts the responses contained in any Amended Answer filed and served herein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Verizon reserves the right to file and 

serve an amended answer and specifically reserves the right to interpose cross-claims and thirdparty claims. 

WHEREFORE, Verizon demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against Verizon, together with its cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 28 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Dated: November 26, 2007 /s/ Eric F. Leon 

Eric F. Leon 

Lee Ann Stevenson 

Andrew Dunlap 

Michael D. Reisman 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Citigroup Center 

153 East 53rd Street 

New York, New York 10022-4611 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Attorneys for Defendant Verizon New York Inc.

TO: Christopher LoPalo, Esq. 

WORBY GRONER EDELMAN & NAPOLI BERN, LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

 Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

ROBERT A. GROCHOW, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

 Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATA 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 Marc D. Weinblatt, Esq. 

SANDERS, SANDERS, BLOCK, WOYICK, VIENER & GROSSMAN, P.C. 

100 Herricks Road 

Mineola, New York 11501 

 David Kremen, Esq. 

OSHMAN & MIRISOLA, LLP 

42 Broadway, 10th Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

 

All Defense Counsel (via ECF)

Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 28 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
[ J

- 4A B

- 2022 ]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

CLAYTON STEVE WILSON,

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 65 MAP 2021

Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court dated December 2,

2020 at No. 48 MDM 2020 d enying the Petition for Permission to Appeal

from the Order of the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, dated September
23, 2020 at No. CP

- 21

- CR

0003002

- 2019.

ARGUED: March 8, 2022

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

CLAYTON STEVE WILSON,

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 66 MAP 2021

Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court dated December 2,

2020 at 49 MDM 2020 denying the Petition for Permission to Appeal

from the Order of the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, dated September 23, 2020 at No. CP 21

- CR

0003196

- 2019.

ARGUED: March 8, 2022

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 28, 2022

AND NOW, this 28 th day of April , 2022

, t he appeal s are DISMISSED as having

been improvidently granted

.
# EUR-Lex - 52004XC0326(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004XC0326(02)

**Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 15 February 2004 to 15 March 2004 (Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) **

*
Official Journal C 077 , 26/03/2004 P. 0007 - 0018 *

Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 15 February 2004 to 15 March 2004

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC(1) or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC(2))

(2004/C 77/03)

- Issuing, maintenance or modification of a national marketing authorisation

>TABLE>

(1) OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67.

(2) OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1.

ANNEX I

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORMS, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTES OF ADMINISTRATION, APPLICANTS, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS, PACKAGING AND PACKAGE SIZES IN THE MEMBER STATES AND NORWAY AND ICELAND

>TABLE>

ANNEX II

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORMS, STRENGTHS, ROUTES OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS, PACKAGING AND PACKAGE SIZES OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT IN THE MEMBER STATES

Article 30 Referral for Calcichew-D3 mite (and related names) Chewable tablets (Calcium 500 mg plus cholecalciferol 5 μg)

>TABLE>

ANNEX III

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS, PACKAGING AND PACKAGE SIZES IN THE MEMBER STATES

>TABLE>

ANNEX IV

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS, PACKAGING AND PACKAGE SIZES IN THE MEMBER STATES

>TABLE>

ANNEX V

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS IN THE MEMBER STATES

>TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH     Document 31      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH     Document 31      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH     Document 31      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 23

               		      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-64476) of Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company 
and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 24, 1996, with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Carolina 
Telephone and Telegraph Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
for the year ended December 31, 1995.

							 ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 28, 1996
EXHIBIT 32.02
                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

I, Debi B. Halbert, the Chief Financial Officer of ProFutures, Inc., as
General Partner of ProFutures Long/Short Growth Fund, L.P., certify that (i)
the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of ProFutures Long/Short
Growth Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of ProFutures Long/Short Growth Fund, L.P.

                             PROFUTURES LONG/SHORT GROWTH FUND, L.P.
                             By:  ProFutures, Inc., General Partner

                             By:      /s/ DEBI B. HALBERT
                                      ----------------------------
                                      Debi B. Halbert
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      August 12, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

Consent of KPMG LLP


The Board of Directors
bigchalk.com, inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-99982, 333-48425, and 333-93099) on Form S-8 of Bell & Howell Company
of our report dated March 26, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of bigchalk.com, inc. and subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, equity (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000,
which report appears in the fiscal 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of ProQuest
Company (formerly known as Bell & Howell Company), as amended on Form 10-K/A.



/s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois

September 20, 2001
Case 1:07-cv-05365-AKH Document 24 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05365-AKH Document 24 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05365-AKH Document 24 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of Yonkers Charter Revision Commission, Appellant, v City of Yonkers et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to compel funding of the petitioner’s budget appropriation pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law § 36, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silver-man, J.), entered May 8, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

*700Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the hearing court that the adoption of Resolution No. 11-1989 constituted an affirmative action on the petitioner’s budgetary request. The Mayor of Yonkers was, therefore, without power to authorize that budget by the filing of a certificate *(see,*Municipal Home Rule Law § 36 [6] [c]). We have considered the petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

KEEGAN C. VAN TUYL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-30020

D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00133-LRS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Lonny R. Suko, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Keegan C. Van Tuyl appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in

part, vacate in part, and remand.

FILED

OCT 28 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-30020

Van Tuyl's sole contention is that the supervised release condition

prohibiting association with Neo-Nazi/white supremacist affiliates is

unconstitutionally overbroad. The government agrees that the judgment should be

changed to explicitly reflect that the condition prohibits association with known

neo-Nazi/white supremacist affiliates. Under these circumstances, we vacate the

challenged condition and remand for the district court to re-sentence in a manner

consistent with this opinion. See, e.g, United States v. Ross, 476 F.3d 719 (9th Cir.

2007). The sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

VACATED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED.