alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 
-  Science 

#           Grover Photo Collection      

  Completed

      By Astrogeology Science Center      March 27, 2019    

            -              Overview           
            -              Science           

**The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle was an engineering marvel,** but It would have collapsed on Earth under the weight of a suited astronaut. That's because it was designed to operate in lunar gravity, which pulls with about 15% as much force as Earth gravity. In the 1960s, engineers at the U.S. Geological Survey's Astrogeology Branch built a near-copy of the Apollo rover that could be used on Earth for astronaut training and lunar exploration planning. They called it Grover the Geologic Rover. Below are a set of photos detailing the assembly process and astronaut training which involved Grover.

### **Photographs**

Below are other science projects associated with this project.

link

####                 Astrolink Online Exhibits              

**The NASA/USGS Astrolink is dedicated to providing online exhibits** of archived materials. Astrolink houses a large collection of historical artifacts in relation to space exploration, map-making, and planetary geology.

link

####   Astrolink Online Exhibits

**The NASA/USGS Astrolink is dedicated to providing online exhibits** of archived materials. Astrolink houses a large collection of historical artifacts in relation to space exploration, map-making, and planetary geology.

Learn More

link

September 12, 2018

####                 Astrolink              

Astrogeology Science Center, Planetary Geologic Mapping

link

September 12, 2018

####   Astrolink

Learn More

**The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle was an engineering marvel,** but It would have collapsed on Earth under the weight of a suited astronaut. That's because it was designed to operate in lunar gravity, which pulls with about 15% as much force as Earth gravity. In the 1960s, engineers at the U.S. Geological Survey's Astrogeology Branch built a near-copy of the Apollo rover that could be used on Earth for astronaut training and lunar exploration planning. They called it Grover the Geologic Rover. Below are a set of photos detailing the assembly process and astronaut training which involved Grover.

### **Photographs**

Below are other science projects associated with this project.

link

####                 Astrolink Online Exhibits              

**The NASA/USGS Astrolink is dedicated to providing online exhibits** of archived materials. Astrolink houses a large collection of historical artifacts in relation to space exploration, map-making, and planetary geology.

link

####   Astrolink Online Exhibits

**The NASA/USGS Astrolink is dedicated to providing online exhibits** of archived materials. Astrolink houses a large collection of historical artifacts in relation to space exploration, map-making, and planetary geology.

Learn More

link

September 12, 2018

####                 Astrolink              

Astrogeology Science Center, Planetary Geologic Mapping

link

September 12, 2018

####   Astrolink

Learn More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7724

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES JEROME ADAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-291, CA-98-201-1-MC-6) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Charles Jerome Adams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for extension of time to file his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion. We have reviewed the record andthe district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Adams , Nos. CR-91-291; CA-98-201-1-MC-6 (D.S.C. Nov. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance of advisory circulars. 

# SUMMARY:

The FAA announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 25.981-1B, “Fuel Tank Ignition Source Prevention Guidelines,” and AC 25.981-2, “Fuel Tank Flammability Minimization.” These advisory circulars provide information and guidance for compliance with recently issued amendments concerning a review of transport airplane fuel tank system designs, the development and implementation of maintenance and inspection to assure the safety of the fuel tank system, and the minimization of the formation or mitigation of hazards from flammable fuel air mixtures within fuel tanks.

# DATES:

The subject advisory circulars were issued in the FAA Transport Airplane Directorate in Renton, Washington, on April 18, 2001.

# HOW TO OBTAIN COPIES:

                         Copies of both AC's can be found and downloaded from the Internet at                         *http://www.faa.gov/​avr/​air/​acs/​achome.htm.*                         Paper copies of the AC's will be available in approximately 6-8 weeks from U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, SVC-121.23, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341, Q 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20785.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pat Siegrist, FAA Standardization Branch, ANM-113, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2126.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 26, 2001.

Donald L. Riggin, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 01-11725 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 38 – Time Series Analysis with Landsat      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we hear about how the Landsat archive enables time series analysis.

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: In the past, remote sensing scientists looked for change on the Earth’s surface primarily by comparing one Landsat image to another. Today, open access to Landsat data, high-performance and cloud computing capabilities and sophisticated algorithms can be used to scan the entirety of the archive for change, enabling researchers to learn more about how the landscape shifts over time. On this episode of Eyes on Earth, Landsat Science Team member Dr. Curtis Woodcock shares his thoughts on time series analysis, the future of remote sensing and his hopes for the Landsat program.

**Guest**:  Dr. Curtis Woodcock, Boston University

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: November 16, 2020

**More on the Curtis Woodcock and Time Series Analysis**: 
                            - GLanCE: Global Land Cover mapping and Estimation
                            - Dr. Curtis Woodcock – Boston University Staff Profile
                            - USGS Land Change Monitoring, Assessment and Projection (LCMAP)
                            - Landsat Analysis Ready Data

### Contacts
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



I, James C. Eckert, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2005

/s/    JAMES C. ECKERTJames C. Eckert Chief Executive Officer
-  Home 
-  Laboratories 
-  Connect 

# Organic Chemistry Research Laboratory

The Organic Chemistry Research Laboratory (OCRL) is located in Sacramento, CA as part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) California Water Science Center. The research team is filled with multidisciplinary scientists with experiences in method development, sample collection, sample preparation, and instrumental analysis.

The OCRL is equipped with state-of-the-art instrumentation for the identification and quantification of trace level organic contaminants in a wide array of environmental media (water, sediment/soil, plants, biota, etc.). 

The OCRL can conduct the elemental analysis of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. Through the application of these analytical techniques, our research aims to provide answers on the fate, degradation or metabolism, mobility, and effects of environmental organic contaminants.

## Instrument Capabilities:  

                            - Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) 
                            - Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry with Purge and Trap (GC/MS with P&T) 
                            - Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS/MS) 
                            - Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) 
                            - Liquid Chromatography High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC/HRMS) 
                            - Elemental Analysis (CHN) 

## Other Analytical Techniques:

                            - Automated Extraction Systems:                               - Accelerated Solvent Extractor (ASE) 200 and 350 (Thermo Scientific)
                              - EDGE (CEM) 
                            - FreeZone 4.5 L Freeze Dryer (Labconco)
                            - Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
                            - Geno/Grinder Automated Tissue Homogenizer and Cell Lyser (SPEX SamplePrep)
                            - Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) - column and dispersive

### Related Science

                        - Pesticide Fate Research Group (PFRG)
## Breadcrumb

-  Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI) 

#           Strategic Planning & Performance              

      By Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

-  Home 
-  Budget 
-  Strategic Planning & Performance 
-  Program Book 
-  Links 
-  Glossary 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Strategic Planning & Performance facilitates the integration of programs, the allocation and alignment of resources, and collaboration and coordination with stakeholders to achieve key goals.

**Department of the Interior (DOI) Strategic Plan**
                            - DOI Strategic Plan

 

**Annual Performance Plan and Report (APP&R)**
                            - DOI Budget & Performance Reports

 

**USGS Science Strategy**
                            -  U.S. Geological Survey 21st-Century Science Strategy 2020 – 2030 

 

**USGS Mission Area Science Strategy Plans**
                            -  USGS Core Science Systems Strategy 
                            -  USGS Energy and Minerals Science Strategy 
                            -  USGS Ecosystems Science Strategy 
                            -  USGS Natural Hazards Science Strategy 
                            -  USGS Water Science Strategy 

### Contacts

#### Anne Barrett

##### Associate Director

Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

abarrett@usgs.gov

703-648-4379

#### Andrew Street

##### Chief of Staff 

Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

astreet@usgs.gov

703-648-4479

#### Arista Maher

##### Deputy Associate Director and Budget Officer

Office of Budget, Planning, and Integration (BPI)

amaher@usgs.gov

703-648-6031
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 6-2 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 6-2 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 6-2 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 6-2 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricardo Torres, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered August 25, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

The defendant’s conviction stemmed from the death of Dennis King, who was shot in a Brooklyn laundromat. The evidence adduced at trial established that the defendant had argued with King and had armed himself with a knife with which he intended to stab the decedent. Prior thereto, however, an unapprehended gunman, whose identity was known to the defendant, fired the fatal shots while the defendant and the decedent argued.

It is uncontroverted that the defendant neither possessed the murder weapon nor fired the fatal shots. Thus, to hold him criminally responsible for the conduct of the shooter, the People were obligated to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with the mental culpability necessary to commit the crime and, in furtherance thereof, he solicited, requested, commanded, importuned or intentionally aided the principal in the commission of the crime (Penal Law § 20.00; *see, Matter of John G.,*118 AD2d 646). In the instant case the People failed to meet this burden.

The People failed to establish that the defendant was acting in concert with the person who shot the deceased. Indeed, the People proffered absolutely no evidence tending to establish *912that the defendant even knew that the shooter was armed *(see, People v Ortiz,*107 AD2d 824; *People v Vasquez,*104 AD2d 429). Moreover, even if the defendant was aware of the weapon possessed by the shooter, the People failed to prove that the defendant shared or was aware of the shooter’s intent to kill the decedent *(see, People v Summerset,*100 AD2d 947; *see also, People v Welcome,*127 AD2d 717). Notwithstanding the defendant’s admitted but uneffectuated intent to stab the decedent, "no intent to [kill] by means of a gun has been shown, and it can be reasonably hypothesized that the defendant [did not intend such] gunfire” *(People v La Coot,*118 AD2d 660, 661). Accordingly, in light of the People’s failure to establish that the defendant shared the shooter’s intent to kill *(see, People v Monaco,*14 NY2d 43), the judgment of conviction must be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2139

RICHARD MARTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE STATE’S ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY; STATE’S 

ATTORNEY JOHN MCCARTHY; ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY CHRISTINA

FAVRETTO; ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY KAREN MOONEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15-

cv-02429-PWG)

Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Martin, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Martin appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) 

(2012). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On appeal, Martin challenges the district court’s 

conclusion that his claims were untimely and barred by quasijudicial immunity. As the district court properly concluded, 

however, the named prosecuting attorneys were subject to quasijudicial immunity “for conduct intimately associated with the 

judicial phase of the criminal process.” See Lyles v. Sparks, 

79 F.3d 372, 376 (4th Cir. 1996) (internal quotation marks 

omitted). 

The district court also properly concluded that Martin’s 

action was untimely. Martin’s claims, whether brought under 

state law or 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), were subject to, at 

longest, a three-year statute of limitations. See Md. Code 

Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101 (2013) (general civil statute of 

limitations); Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-105 (2013) 

(actions for assault and defamation); Owens v. Balt. City 

State’s Attorneys Office, 767 F.3d 379, 388 (4th Cir. 2014) 

(§ 1983 claims), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1893 (2015). While 

Martin’s malicious prosecution claim has not yet accrued, this 

claim is barred by his inability to meet the favorable 

termination requirement. See Heron v. Strader, 761 A.2d 56, 59 
3

(Md. 2000). Contrary to Martin’s assertions, the facts alleged 

in the complaint demonstrate that his remaining claims accrued, 

at the latest, by the time he was released from prison, and the 

limitations period was not subject to tolling. A Soc’y Without 

a Name v. Virginia, 655 F.3d 342, 348 (4th Cir. 2011) (accrual 

under § 1983); Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. Dhanda, 43 A.3d 1029, 

1034-34, 1039-41 (Md. 2012) (discussing accrual and tolling

under state law); see also Nat’l Advert. Co. v. Raleigh, 947 

F.2d 1158, 1166-67 (4th Cir. 1991) (describing continuing 

violations doctrine). Finally, because Martin’s claims were

properly dismissed, the district court committed no error in 

denying as moot Martin’s request to file electronically. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

deny Martin’s motions to seal and to compel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.6

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven C. Voorhees, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rock-Tenn Company; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven C. VoorheesSteven C. VoorheesExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer


Date: April 20, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 302, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 302, has been provided to Rock-Tenn
Company and will be retained by Rock-Tenn Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.