alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 17
Clear All

        09 November 2023    

                    MSRON 2 Masters-at-Arms Earn Navy Security Forces Breast Insignia                 
                The Master-at-Arms assigned to Maritime Expeditionary Security Squadron (MSRON) 2’s Echo Company pinned eight Sailors as Navy Security Force (NSF) specialists, senior specialists and master specialists.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Etelos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

(a)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August 19, 2009 | /s/ Daniel J.A. Kolke                       |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                        | Daniel J.A. Kolke, Chief  Executive Officer |
|                        | (Principal Executive Officer)               |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Don Crosbie, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CLAIMSNET.COM INC.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) [Reserved]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.      Date: July 24, 2006     /s/ Don Crosbie     Don Crosbie  Chief Executive Officer
# C_2009154EN.01001802.xml

| 7.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/18

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 154/08

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Trapani–Milano Linate and vice versa
  Trapani–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Date of cancellation of the PSO on these routes | From 24.6.2009 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC)





  Direzione centrale regolazione economica |
| Direzione trasporto aereo |
| Viale del Castro Pretorio, n. 118 |
| 00185 Roma |
| ITALIA |
| www.enac-italia.it |
| E-mail: trasporto.aereo@enac.rupa.it |

Member State

Italy

Concerned routes

Trapani–Milano Linate and vice versa

Trapani–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Date of cancellation of the PSO on these routes

From 24.6.2009

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC)

Direzione centrale regolazione economica

Direzione trasporto aereo

Viale del Castro Pretorio, n. 118

00185 Roma

ITALIA

www.enac-italia.it

E-mail: trasporto.aereo@enac.rupa.it

---
Case 1:07-cv-05307-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50973 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS SOTO-BELTRAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-970-ALL-PRM

-------------------- Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus SotoBeltran raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50972 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GENE GUERRERO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-97-CR-35-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gene Guerrero appeals his conviction and sentence for

possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He

contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to

suppress evidence seized as a result of a search of his vehicle

because the officers lacked probable cause to search the vehicle. 

The district court’s factual findings are not clearly erroneous. 

United States v. Thomas, 12 F.3d 1350, 1366 (5th Cir. 1994); see

United States v. Guerrero, No. SA-97-CR-35 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 4,

1997). The district court did not err in denying the motion to 
No. 97-50972 

-2-

suppress evidence on the ground that the officers had probable

cause to conduct the search of Guerrero’s vehicle. See United

States v. Williams, 69 F.3d 27, 28 (5th Cir. 1995). 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.1


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         SUMMIT BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC.

                             (A FLORIDA CORPORATION)

         Pursuant to the provisions of Section 607.1006, Florida Statutes, this
Corporation adopts the following articles of amendment to its Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation:

         1.       The name of the Corporation is SUMMIT BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC.

         2        Section A(1) of Article V of the Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "...(1) The maximum aggregate number of shares of
                  common stock, par value $.0001 per share (the "Common
                  Stock"), that this Corporation shall have the authority
                  to issue is 20,000,000 shares."

         3.       The foregoing amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of
the Corporation was adopted and approved by (i) the written consent of the
Corporation's Board of Directors, effective as of June 15, 2001, and (ii) by the
holders of a majority of the Corporation's issued and outstanding capital stock
entitled to vote thereon, representing the number of votes sufficient for
approval at an annual meeting of shareholders held on August 4, 2001.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles of Amendment have been executed this
4th day of August, 2001.

                                     SUMMIT BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC.



                                     By:  /s/ Richard Parker
                                         --------------------------------------
                                              Richard Parker, Chairman and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
#                                                                         Forward Deployable Preventative Medical Unit Enhances Combat Effectiveness with Comprehensive Weapons and Threat Recognition Training                                                                    

##### by Desmond Martin

13 February 2024

Tags:
**Forward Deployable Preventative Medical Unit**FDPMU**NMCFPHC**Navy medicine
Case 1:07-cv-05298-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05298-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        25 January 2023    

                    Teea Wyatt: A Navy Spouse with Grit and Tenacity                 
                WASHINGTON - If you have yet to meet Teea Wyatt at one of the Navy Wounded Warrior sports camps, you have to make it a point to do so the next time around.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Alaska Science Center Newsletter 

# Alaska Science Center Newsletter - Fall 2020

We hope you enjoy and subscribe. Below are links to recent publications, data releases, and highlights of on-going research programs. In this issue we feature news on the Pacific marine heatwave, Alaska Earth Mapping Resources Initiative, and our Ecosystems Analytics group. See new additions to the Wildlife Tracking page, Data and tools and Publications.

**Subscribe**Subscribe

August 17, 2020

####               Story Map on Pacific Marine Heatwave and Seabird Die-off          

####               Alaska Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI)          

####               Ecosystems Analytics          

## Wildlife Tracking Data Collection with Animated Tracking Maps

### Understanding the movements of wildlife is critical for a wide variety of ecological research questions and management decisions.

Read More

####             Science          

####             Data          

####             Publications
#### Christopher LANE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne McCABE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6404.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Christopher Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*272Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lane seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp.2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Lane that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Lane has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 24-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 24-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00695-CR

IN RE Armando ZAPATA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 20, 2011, relator Armando Zapata filed a petition for writ of mandamus, 

complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on various pro se motions. However, counsel has 

been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which 

he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See 

Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 

481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or 

petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by 

counsel. See Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CR-0335, styled State of Texas v. Armando Zapata, pending in the 

227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip Kazen presiding.
04-11-00695-CR

- 2 -

discretion by declining to rule on relator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding 

pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

 
                          DAUPHIN DEPOSIT CORPORATION

Subsidiaries

     The Registrant has four direct wholly-owned subsidiaries: Dauphin Deposit 
Bank and Trust Company; Dauphin Life Insurance Company; Dauphin Investment 
Company; and Hopper Soliday & Co., Inc.

     Dauphin Bank and Trust Company, a bank and trust company chartered under 
the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965, as amended, is engaged in the commercial 
and retail banking and trust business.

     Dauphin Life Insurance Company, incorporated under the laws of Arizona, 
reinsurance credit life, health and accident insurance directly related to 
extensions of credit by the Bank.

     Dauphin Investment Company, incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 
engaged in investment of securities and the maintenance of said investments for 
its own account.
      
     Hopper Soliday & Co., Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is
engaged in municipal finance, institutional sales, financial advisory and other
general securities businesses permitted for bank holding companies and their 
non-bank subsidiaries.

     In addition to the above, Dauphin Bank has two subsidiaries, Financial Land
Corporation, which was incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania for the 
purpose of holding assets acquired in loan liquidations and Eastern Mortgage 
Services, Inc., a Pennsylvania mortgage banking corporation acquired on July 1, 
1994.
EDWARD D. WILFORD

Attorney at Law

20 Vesey Street - Suite 400

New York, New York 10007

(212) 528-2741 Fax (212) 964-2926

October 15, 2007

VIA FACSIMILE

Hon. William H. Pauley

United States District Judge 

Southern District of New York

Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse

500 Pearl Street

New York, New York 10007

Re: United States v. Richard Lord

 07 Cr. 554 (WHP)

Dear Judge Pauley:

I am writing to the court to request an adjournment of the sentence in the above

referenced matter. The sentence is currently scheduled for October 26, 2007, at 4:30 p.m.,

however I was reminded by my wife that we have a family trip planned for that weekend and

planned to leave at 12:00 noon.

Therefore it is respectfully requested that the court adjourn Mr. Lord’s sentencing until

November 2, 2007. 

I have spoken with counsel for the government and that date is agreeable to the

government.

Should the court have any questions or require additional information please do not

hesitate to contact me.

Yours etc.,

Edward D. Wilford

Edward D. Wilford

EDW/nes

cc: Jillian Berman, Esq.

Mr. Richard Lord

Case 1:07-cr-00554-WHP Document 15 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009049EN.01000601.xml

| 28.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/6

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of polyester staple fibres originating, inter alia, in the Republic of Korea; change of the name of a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty

inter alia

(2009/C 49/04)

Imports of polyester staple fibres originating, inter alia, in the Republic of Korea are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 (1) as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 (2) (‘Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000’).

inter alia

1

2

Saehan Industries Inc., a company located in the Republic of Korea, whose exports to the Community of polyester staple fibres are subject to an individual anti-dumping duty of 10,6 % imposed by Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000, has informed the Commission that its company name changed on 21 March 2008 to Woongjin Chemical Co., Ltd. The company name change was registered on 1 April 2008 by the competent registration office in the Republic of Korea.

The company has argued that its change of name does not affect its right to benefit from the individual anti-dumping duty applied to it under its previous name of Saehan Industries Inc.

The Commission has examined the information provided and has concluded that this change of name in no way affects the findings of Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000. Therefore, the reference, in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000, to:

Saehan Industries Inc.

should be read as:

Woongjin Chemical Co., Ltd.

The Taric additional code A599 previously attributed to Saehan Industries Inc. shall apply to Woongjin Chemical Co., Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ L 332, 28.12.2000, p. 17.

1

(2)  OJ L 71, 17.3.2005, p. 1.

2

---