alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Judee Monsca CRUZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-73168.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 26, 2013.*

Filed May 24, 2013.

Thomas Prince, Law Offices of Thomas Prince, Pomona, CA, for Petitioner.

*584OIL, Richard Zanfardino, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *584*See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Judee Monsca Cruz, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for withholding of removal and for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence. *Zhou v. Gonzales,*487 F.3d 860, 864 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.1

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Cruz was ineligible for withholding of removal because she failed to establish either past persecution or an independent showing of a clear probability of future persecution in the Philippines. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1281(b)(8); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b); *Tamang v. Holder,*598 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th Cir.2010); *see also Santos*—Lemus *v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 742-44 (9th Cir.2008)(reeognizing that safety of similarly situated family member is substantial evidence that there is not a basis for fearing persecution).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Cruz failed to show that it is more likely than not that she will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of government officials if she is removed to the Philippines. *See Santos*— Lemus, 542 F.3d at 747-48.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history underlying this appeal, we do not recount them here.
ATTORNEY’S AFFIDAVIT 

IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO VACATE 

PROCESS OF MARITIME 

ATTACHMENT 

EXHIBIT 22 

Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 3 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 4 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 5 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 6 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 7 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 8 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 9 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 10 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 11 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 12 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 13 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 14 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 15 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 16 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 17 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 18 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 19 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 20 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 21 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 22 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 23 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 24 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 25 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 26 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 27 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 28 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-23 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 29 of 29
Clear All

        22 September 2022    

                    SUBLANT Hosts Regional, Area Commander Summit                 
                Submarine Force Atlantic (SUBLANT) hosted a regional and area commander summit onboard Naval Support Activity Hampton Roads, Sept. 15.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 29 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23730-23731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-01-019]


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: International Trade Commission.

TIME AND DATE: May 16, 2001 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

[[Page 23731]]

Matters To Be Considered:

    1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-414 and 731-TA-928 (Preliminary) (Softwood 
Lumber from Canada)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on 
May 17, 2001; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be 
transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on May 24, 2001.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    1. Document No. GC-01-042: Regarding Inv. No. 337-TA-429 (Certain 
Bar Clamps, Bar Clamp Pads, and Related Packaging, Display, and Other 
Materials).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 4, 2001.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11827 Filed 5-7-01; 2:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David M. Oliver, Chief Financial Officerof Arden Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge (1) the annualreport on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 28, 2002, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | /s/  DAVID M. OLIVER |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Name:  | David M. Oliver           |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer   |
|   | Date:  | September 18, 2003        |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                                 AMRESCO, INC.

                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Twelve Months Ended
                                                                 December 31,
                                               ---------------------------------------------
                                                  1996             1995              1994
                                               -----------       -----------     -----------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>             <C>
Primary:
--------
 Net income                                    $31,332,000       $21,090,000     $18,748,000
                                               ===========       ===========     ===========
 Weighted average common shares outstanding
                                                27,256,346        24,137,358      22,958,502
 Net effect of dilutive stock options based
   on the Treasury stock method using average
   market price                                    843,065           516,963         720,737
                                               -----------       -----------     -----------
     Total                                      28,099,411        24,654,321      23,679,239
                                               ===========       ===========     ===========


Earnings per share                             $      1.12       $      0.86     $      0.79
                                               ===========       ===========     ===========

Fully diluted:
--------------
 Net income                                    $31,332,000       $21,090,000     $18,748,000
 Interest expense related to convertible
   debentures, net of income tax expense         2,101,000           192,000
                                               -----------       -----------     -----------
 Adjusted net income                           $33,433,000       $21,282,000     $18,748,000
                                               ===========       ===========     ===========
 Weighted average common shares outstanding
   assuming conversion of convertible
   debentures to 3,600,000 shares of common
   stock in November 1995                       30,807,434        24,469,966      22,958,502
 Net effect of dilutive stock options based
   on the Treasury stock method using the
   higher of average or ending market price      1,019,447           608,058         738,851
                                               -----------       -----------     -----------
     Total                                      31,826,880        25,078,024      23,697,353
                                               ===========       ===========     ===========

Earnings per share                             $      1.05       $      0.85     $      0.79
                                               ===========       ===========     ===========

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of Telecommunications Income Fund XI, L.P. as of
March 31, 2000, and the three months ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,005,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,707,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (263,682)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,449,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          877,364
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,572,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,449,476
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               416,315
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,825
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                231,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            231,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   231,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                      18.39<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    18.39<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Net Income (Loss) per Partnership Unit
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

**AMENDMENT NO. 2TOAMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

            This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment’) dated as of December 1, 2005, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), andJoseph D. Moore (the “Executive”).

**            WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Amended and Restated Employment  Agreement,  dated as of September 23, 2004, as amended as of December 1, 2004(collectively, the “EA”), to secure the services of the Executive as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Executive Vice President; and

**            WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $583,495, effective as of January 1, 2006.

            **NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:

            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided inthe EA.

            2.**        **Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby  deleted and replaced withthe following new Section 6(a):

                        “ (a).  *Base Salary.*  The Executive’s base salary hereunder, from September 23, 2004 to December31, 2004, shall be $550,000 per year, and from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 shall be $566,500 per year, in each case payable semi-monthly. Effective January 1, 2006, the Executive’s base salary hereunder shall be $583,495 per year, payable semi-monthly.The Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustments from time to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”

            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby ratified  by the Company and the Executive.

**- 2 -**

            **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by  its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year firstset forth above.

                                                                       **Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**

                                                                       By:  /s/ Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                                                  Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                   Executive Vice President

                                                                       **Executive**:

                                                                       /s/ Joseph D.Moore                                                                                                               Joseph D. Moore
# Documenting Your Response to a Natural Disaster

**Posted: Oct. 5, 2016**

Updated: Sept. 25, 2023

            -   Find similar NFIRSGrams:
            - Basic Module
            - Coding

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

This NFIRSGram explains how to complete a National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) report for response to a natural disaster or large-scale event.

When a disaster strikes, such as the flooding that occurred in Louisiana, or the wildfires in California, it is common for neighboring fire departments to respond and to assist other governmental agencies responsible for mitigating the incident. When fire departments respond to a natural disaster or another large-scale event, they effectively become the resources of the incident command group for the duration of the event, or until they are released.

Each fire department requested to assist should complete an NFIRS report.

## How to document a natural disaster response

              - Aid Given  is “Other aid given” (Aid Given code 5), and the  Incident Type  is “Assist police or other governmental agency” (Incident Type code 551). The single incident report covers the department’s duration of time at the disaster.
              - The  Alarm Date and Time  is the date and time the department was alerted to respond.
              - The  Arrival Date and Time  is the date and time the first responding unit arrived at the incident scene.
              - The  Last Unit Cleared Date and Time  is the date and time the department was released to return to its home quarters. In some cases, this could mean days, weeks or months.
              - Actions Taken  on this report are the following codes: 73 – Provide manpower, 74 – Provide apparatus, or 75 – Provide equipment. Note: Record up to three of the most significant actions taken by the fire department at the scene of the incident.
              - Property Use  is Code 900 – Outside or special property, other.

Departments may wish to keep track of how many rescues, searches, etc., that they perform while at the disaster, but there is no need to complete a separate NFIRS report for these “incidents” or tasks. They are documented by the state agency heading the operation, recorded in the daily operations plan, and tracked by the Planning and Operations Sections of the Incident Management Team.

For more information about NFIRS, please contact the NFIRS Support Center: Monday – Friday between 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. ET, at 888-382-3827 or by email at fema-nfirshelp@fema.dhs.gov.
#### In the Matter of Emmanuel Patterson, Appellant, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously vacated, determination confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The court erred in failing to transfer the proceeding to this court *(see,*CPLR 7804 [g]; 7803 [4]), but we review the issues as if the proceeding had been properly transferred in the first instance *(see, Matter of Melvin v Kelly,*126 AD2d 956, *Iv denied*69 NY2d 609; *Matter of Curl v Kelly,*125 AD2d 948).

The determination was based on the written report and testimony of the charging officer. The Hearing Officer was entitled to credit this evidence even though petitioner presented inmate witnesses whose testimony differed from that of the charging officer. The determination was supported by *1013substantial evidence and must be confirmed *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130; *Matter of Melvin v Kelly, supra).*

Petitioner’s remaining argument, that the penalty imposed was improper in that the Hearing Officer recommended a job reassignment, is not properly before us. The Hearing Officer merely expressed an advisory opinion. Petitioner has no statutory, regulatory or precedential right to a specific prison job *(see, Matter of Cooper v Smith,*99 AD2d 644, *affd*63 NY2d 615). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Clear All

        06 August 2022    

                    USS Farragut Deploys with George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group                 
                MAYPORT, Fla. -- Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Farragut (DDG 99) deployed as part of the George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group (GHWBCSG) from Naval Station Mayport, Florida, Aug. 6.            

        19 April 2022    

                    Sailors celebrate Navy Week New Orleans 2022                 
                NEW ORLEANS - Several military vessels arrived to the Julia Street Cruise Terminal to kick off Navy Week New Orleans New Orleans April 18.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           PROVINCE HEALTHCARE COMPANY

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Province Healthcare Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Martin S. Rash, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Christopher T. Hannon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

         (2)      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 8, 2003

                                               /s/ Martin S. Rash
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Martin S. Rash
                                               Chief Executive Officer

                                               /s/ Christopher T. Hannon
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Christopher T. Hannon
                                               Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished to the SEC pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" as part of the Report for purposes
of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Province Healthcare Company and will be retained by Province Healthcare Company
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.