alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED February
28, 1999.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Aug-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Feb-28-1999
<CASH>                                            3958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      103
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4061
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              482
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       8000
<COMMON>                                         12435
<OTHER-SE>                                      (16646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4271
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (3068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (3068)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.001)

        

</TABLE>
Clear All

        08 May 2023    

                    Navy League Hosts CNAL Spouse Working Group                 
                Navy League Hampton Roads hosted a Navy spouse working group, in  coordination with Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic (CNAL), to provide the spouses of senior leaders in naval aviation an opportunity to advocate for issues that are important to them and their families, May 5.             

        25 January 2023    

                    Teea Wyatt: A Navy Spouse with Grit and Tenacity                 
                WASHINGTON - If you have yet to meet Teea Wyatt at one of the Navy Wounded Warrior sports camps, you have to make it a point to do so the next time around.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 20 of 20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      19,190,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,132,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   519,000
<INVENTORY>                                 14,954,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,964,000
<PP&E>                                      14,227,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              71,755,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              83,520,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,165,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       223,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 155,930,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                83,520,000
<SALES>                                    145,415,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           145,415,000
<CGS>                                       77,267,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               77,267,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             614,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,092,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (56,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,148,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,148,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-181617) and Amendment No. 387 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2019,
      with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in
      a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    /s/Ernst & Young, LLP

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 20, 2019
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00087

- CV

IN RE WILLIAM R. NORTON

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER
On September 20, 2019, William R. Norton filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking an order from this Court requiring the trial court to vacate its August 21, 2019, amended order granting Lasagna Vaughn’s motion for new trial and to enter judgment on the jury verdict. On October 16, 2019, Norton filed a motion for temporary relief requesting that this Court enter a temporary stay of all trial court proceedings pending this Court’s ruling on Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to Rule 52.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.10. On October 16, 2019, Vaughn filed her response to Relator’s motion for temporary relief and to stay all proceedings in the trial court. Vaughn specifically opposes the request for sta y as it applies to the previously noticed deposition of her surgeon, Ellis Cooper III, M.D., on Thursday, October 24, 2019, 1 but agrees with the remainder of the temporary stay request. After reviewing the petition for writ of mandamus, the motion for temporary relief, and the response to the motion for temporary relief, this Court is of the opinion that the relief requested in the motion for temporary relief should be granted, in part. Accordingly, all proceedings in the trial court are stayed pending this Court’s decision on the petition for writ of mandamus, with the specific exception of the deposition of Ellis Cooper, III, M.D., previously noticed for October 24, 2019. That deposition is not subject to this temporary relief order.

1 Vaughn attached the affidavit of her counsel, Michael E. Heygood, to her response to Norton’s motion for temporary relief, wherein Heygood stated that, “On October 4, 2019, Plaintiff Lasagna Vaughn, by and through her lawyers, spent $1,500 related to the deposition of Dr. Ellis Cooper. While there will be additional expenses related to the taking of this deposition, this $1,500 is non

- refundable.”3 Now, therefor e, it is ORDERED that all proceedings in trial court cause number 17C1213

- 202 in the 202 nd Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas, with the specific exception of the October 24, 2019, deposition of Ellis Cooper, III, M.D., shall be stayed, pending this Court’s decision on Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: October 17, 2019
Exhibit
31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
Richard M. Greenwood, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of BICO, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: May
20, 2005
 
 /s/Richard
M. Greenwood
 ---------------------------------------
 Richard
M. Greenwood, Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6470

MONTY JACKSON SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GARY D. MAYNARD, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-4374-25AJ) Submitted: July 18, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monty Jackson Smith, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Monty Jackson Smith, a state pri soner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable of wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### *In re*SUTHERIN, Cynthia

(MR 20636)

Northbrook, IL

Order of the Court:

The petition by respondent Cynthia Sutherin for leave to file exceptions to the report and recommendation of the Review Board is denied. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court, as recommended by the Review Board.
BMC Buckbee-Mears St. Paul

HAND DELIVERED & CERTIF1ED MAIL 

July 20, 1999 

GMT CorporationC/OCB Richard Ellis245East 6th StreetSt. Paul. MN 55101
| R.E: | Lease of  Premises at 245 East 6th Street in St. Paul, by BMC Industries,  Inc. from GMT Corporation |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Thisletter is written notice pursuant to Section 4 of the Amendment of Lease datedAugust 1, 1998, that the tenant elects to reduce the leased premises byterminating the referenced lease as to part of the S-228 space containingapproximately 1,325squarefeet effective 150 days from the date hereof.

Please contact us to confirm theeffective date of the change and the new rent, CAM and tax charges applicableto our lease.

Verytruly yours,BMCIndustries. Inc.

/s/Wes Cohen

Wes CohenController,Buckbee-Mears St. Paul
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

I, Alan D. Feldman, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                |  |                
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|/s/ Alan D. Feldman                            
|Alan D. Feldman                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                                           |  | August 13, 2009

I, William M. Guzik, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     |  |                
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|/s/ William M. Guzik                                
|William M. Guzik                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                                                |  | August 13, 2009
Exhibit 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

     I, Anders Ericsson, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Mobiclear, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: April 14, 2008


/s/  Anders Ericsson
----------------------------------
     Anders Ericsson
     Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Daniel Hunter, the Chief Executive Officer of FinMetal Mining Ltd., and Kenneth Phillippe, the Chief Financial Officer of FinMetal Mining Ltd., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Report on Form 10-QSB of FinMetal Mining Ltd., for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FinMetal Mining Ltd.

Date:     November 14, 2007.

| | /s/ "Daniel Hunter"                      
| | -----------------------------------------
| | Daniel Hunter
Chief Executive Officer    
| | /s/ "Kenneth Phillippe"                  
| | Kenneth Phillippe
Chief Financial Officer

__________
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 25 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 25 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### CONDIT, Appellant, v. WAHLIG et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by Stephen G. Condit against Charles Wahlig and others. M. S. Wise, for appellant. B. F. Einstein, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with cos„s.