alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DOCSNY-267206v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

SEVERO VEGA (AND WIFE, LILA 

GONZALEZ), 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-4521-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 22 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-267206v01 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

/s/ Judith R. Cohen______________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-04521-AKH Document 22 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1826 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide payment of Medal of 

Honor special pension under such title to the surviving spouse of a 

deceased Medal of Honor recipient, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2019 

Mr. LAMB (for himself and Mr. MAST) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide payment 

of Medal of Honor special pension under such title to 

the surviving spouse of a deceased Medal of Honor recipient, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Valuing Our 

5 Widows and Widowers Act’’ or the ‘‘Veterans VOW Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1826 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDAL OF HONOR SPECIAL PENSION FOR SUR2 VIVING SPOUSES. 

3 (a) CODIFICATION OF CURRENT RATE OF SPECIAL

4 PENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1562 of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘$1,329.58’’. 

7 (b) SPECIAL PENSION FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES.— 

8 (1) SURVIVING SPOUSE BENEFIT.—Such sub9 section is further amended— 

10 (A) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the 

14 Secretary shall pay special pension under this section to 

15 the surviving spouse of a person who was awarded a Medal 

16 of Honor as described in section 1134a(b) of title 10. 

17 ‘‘(B) No special pension shall be paid to a surviving 

18 spouse of a person under this section unless such surviving 

19 spouse was married to such person— 

20 ‘‘(i) for one year or more prior to the veteran’s 

21 death; or 

22 ‘‘(ii) for any period of time if a child was born 

23 of the marriage, or was born to them before the 

24 marriage.’’. 

25 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1826 IH

1 (A) IN GENERAL.—Such section is amend2 ed— 

3 (i) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘or 

4 married to more than one person who has 

5 been awarded the Medal of Honor,’’ after 

6 ‘‘Honor,’’; and 

7 (ii) in subsection (f)(1), by striking 

8 ‘‘this section’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 

9 (1) of subsection (a), or under paragraph 

10 (2) of such subsection in the case of a 

11 posthumous entry on the Army, Navy, Air 

12 Force, and Coast Guard medal of Honor 

13 Roll,’’. 

14 (B) SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO

15 MARRIAGES.—Section 103(d)(5) of such title is 

16 amended by adding at the end the following 

17 new subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(E) Section 1562(a)(2), relating to Medal of 

19 Honor special pension.’’. 

20 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

21 by this subsection shall apply with respect to pay22 ment of pension under section 1562 of title 38, 

23 United States Code, for months beginning after the 

24 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2004297EN.01000201.xml

| 2.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/2

---

Notice concerning the anti-subsidy and anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India: change in the name of a company subject to individual countervailing and anti-dumping duty rates

(2004/C 297/02)

Imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India are subject to a definitive countervailing duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 (1) and to a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 (2).

1

2

Jindal Polyester Limited, a company located in India, whose exports to the Community of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film are subject to an individual countervailing duty rate of 7,00 % and an individual anti-dumping duty rate of 0,00 %, has informed the Commission that on 19 April 2004 it has changed its name to Jindal Poly Films Limited. The company has argued that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual countervailing and anti-dumping duty rates applied to the company under its previous name of Jindal Polyester Limited.

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 and those of Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001. Therefore, the reference to Jindal Polyester Limited should be read as Jindal Poly Films Limited in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 and in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.

The Taric additional code A030 previously attributed to Jindal Polyester Limited shall apply to Jindal Poly Films Limited.

---

(1)  OJ L 316, 10.12.1999, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 227, 23.8.2001, p. 1.

2

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Robert J. Phillippy, certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b)
or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Newport Corporation for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Newport
Corporation.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert J. Phillippy              
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Robert J. Phillippy                  
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Newport Corporation and will be retained by Newport Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 

IN RE VIVENDI UNIVERSAL, S.A. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

07 Civ. 5742 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 02 Civ. 5571 (RJH) (HBP) 

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Please enter the appearance of Javier Bleichmar, a member of the bar of this Court, as 

counsel for Plaintiffs Capitalia Asset Management SGR S.p.A. and Capitalia Investment 

Management S.A. in the above-captioned action. 

Dated: New York, New York Respectfully submitted, 

January 10, 2008 

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

 By: /s/ Eric Belfi__ 

 Eric Belfi (EB-8895) 

 Javier Bleichmar (JB-0435) 

 140 Broadway 

 New York, New York 10005 

 Telephone: 212-907-0700 

 Facsimile: 212-818-0477 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Capitalia Asset 

 Management SGR S.p.A. and Capitalia 

 Investment Management S.A. 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 25 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on January 10, 2008, I caused the foregoing Notice of Appearance to be 

electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court through the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send 

notification of such public filing to all counsel registered to receive such notice, and to be sent by 

U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, to the following counsel: 

Michael T. Reynolds 

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 

Worldwide Plaza 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Michael J. Malone 

King & Spalding LLP 

1185 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Michael E. Swartz, Esq. 

Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP 

919 Third Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

 /s/ Javier Bleichmar 

Javier Bleichmar (JB-0435) 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 25 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
T O THE C OURT O F C RIMINAL A PPEALS

No. 01

- 13

- 00373

- CR

N ORMA C LARK

Appeal from Cause Number 1295757

From the 22 8th District C ourt

Harris County

vs.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS

A PP ELLANT ’ S M OTION T O E XTEND T IME T O F ILE PDR

T O T HE H ONORABLE J UDGES O F T HE C OURT O F C RIMINAL A PPEALS :

C OMES N OW

, N ORMA C LARK

, and files this Motion to Extend Time to File PDR , and

in support thereof, would respectfully show the Court the following:

I.

The First Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an opinion dat ed

January 13, 2015

. Clark v. State

, 01

- 13

- 00373

- CR, 2015 WL 162257 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 13, 2015, no. pet. h.)

. No other motions for extension have

been filed.

II.

Appellant requests this extension due to the fact that counsel for Appellant has been

eng aged in work in the Harris County Public Defender’s Office on many cases,

including the following:

 In re K.C., 2012

- 04759J

 Curtis Fournier, WR

- 82,102

- 01

 Christopher Dowden, WR

- 82,103

- 01

 Rodney Robins, 01

- 14

- 00582

- CR

 Craig Beal, 01

- 12

- 00896

- CR

 Abner Washington, 01

- 14

- 00885

- CR PD-0172-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 2/12/2015 11:05:05 AM

Accepted 2/12/2015 1:52:41 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK Forest Penton, 14

- 14

- 00406

- CR

 Felix Irizarry, 14

- 14

- 00827

- CR

 Dozens of writs of habeas corpus regarding the online solicitation of a minor

act being declared unconstitutional

 Counsel has been researching and writing for several trial cases assigned to the

Public Defender’s Office Trial Division.

III.

Appellee ’s attorney requests an extension of 30 days

, which is necessary so that the

brief can be thoro ughly written and timely filed. This motion is not made for the

purpose of delay.

PRAYER

W HEREFORE

, P REMISES C ONSIDERED

, Appellee prays that this Honorable Court

grants this requested extensi on of time to file the PDR in the above cause and extend

the time for filing to March 14 , 2015

.

Respectfully submitted,

A LEXANDER B UNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County, Texas

/s/ Sarah V. Wood

S ARAH V. W OOD

Assistant Public Defender

Harris County, Texas

Texas Bar Number 24048898

1201 Franklin, 13 th Floor

Houston Texas 77002

713.368.0016 (phone)

713.368.9278 (fax)

Sarah.Wood@pdo.hctx.netC ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

By my signature below, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of t h e above and

foregoing Appellant ’s Motion to Extend Time to File PDR has been served via the

efile service on the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ Sarah V. Wood

Sarah V. Wood
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending November 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Quinn, Principal Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Michael R. Quinn



Michael R. Quinn,

 Principal Financial Officer and Director

May 25, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 4-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4353

_____________________________

ELIJAH L. UNION,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

February 27, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C).

LEWIS, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Elijah L. Union, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Applica Incorporated for the year
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Harry D. Schulman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Applica Incorporated, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Applica Incorporated. Dated: March 11, 2005
    By:

/s/  Harry D. SchulmanHarry D. SchulmanPresident, Chief Executive Officer and
Secretary
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 37 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Coley Terrance HOLMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-4972.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 6, 2013.

Decided: May 9, 2013.

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, T. Nick Matkins, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Bethany Corbin, Third Year Law Student, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*163Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Coley Terrance Holman pled guilty in accordance with a written plea agreement to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2006). He was sentenced to 186 months in prison. Holman now appeals, arguing that he was improperly sentenced as an armed career criminal because the indictment did not charge a violation of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2006). We affirm.

As Holman acknowledges in his brief, controlling circuit precedent defeats his claim. We have held that prior convictions used as the basis for sentencing a defendant as an armed career criminal need not be charged in the indictment or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. *United States v. Cheek,*415 F.3d 349, 352 (4th Cir.2005).

We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# EUR-Lex - 52004XC0311(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004XC0311(02)

**Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures **

*
Official Journal C 062 , 11/03/2004 P. 0004 - 0004 *

Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures

(2004/C 62/03)

1. As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997(1) on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2. Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3. Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels(2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

4. This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997.

>TABLE>

(1) OJ L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1973/2002 (OJ L 305, 7.11.2002, p. 4).

(2) Telex COMEU B 21877; Telefax (32-2) 295 65 05.
T 

' ! USDc SDNY 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ..................................................................... X 

NANCY DENARDI, 

Plaintiff, 

- against - 

DM IMAGING, P.c. and IMAGING SUPPORT 

SERVICES, LLC , 

ORDER OF REFERENCE 

TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Defendants. -- 

O7 Civ. 57'4 (M~(.MH~ 

The above entitled action is referred to the designated Magistrate Judge for the following 

purpose(s): 

General Pretrial (includes scheduling, 

discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, 

and settlement) 

- Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute:* 

If referral is for discovery disputes when 

the District Judge is unavailable, the time 

period of the referral: 

Settlement* *Please hold settlement 

conference in August* 

- Inquest After DefaultIDamages Hearing 

- Consent under 28 U.S.C. §636(c) for a!l 

purposes (including trial) 

- Consent under 28 U.S.C.§636(c) for 

limited purpose (e.g., dispositive motion, 

preliminary injunction) 

Purpose: 

- Habeas Corpus 

- Social Security 

- Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring 

a Report and Recommendation) 

Particular Motion: 

All such motions: - 

Do not check if already rcfemed for gencral prchial. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: New York, New York 

Julv 23, 2008 

Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 13 Filed 07/24/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 4 of 4
February 14, 2000


Matt Moore
Hand Delivered

Re:  Retention Bonus Plan

Dear Matt:

In  recognition of your past and ongoing contributions to AMRESCO,  we
are  pleased to offer to you a Retention Bonus, based upon  the  terms
and conditions contained herein.
We believe that there is an ongoing position for you with AMRESCO, and
this  letter  in  no  way  implies that we intend  to  terminate  your
employment  with  AMRESCO  at some future  date.   Rather,  it  is  to
acknowledge your special value to our organization.

If  you are a full-time employee on June 30, 2000 of AMRESCO or one of
its  affiliates,  you  will  be paid a one  time  Retention  Bonus  of
$70,000.  This amount will be paid in a lump sum on June 30, 2000, and
will  be subject to applicable withholding.  This Retention Bonus will
not  affect any other form of incentive compensation for which you are
or may become eligible.

If  you voluntarily terminate your employment or your employment  with
AMRESCO is terminated for Cause (as defined herein) prior to June  30,
2000,  you will not be entitled to this Retention Bonus.  "Termination
for Cause", as used herein, means (1) termination for gross misconduct
or  willful, substantial violation of AMRESCO policies and  procedures
or  (2) termination for other performance deficiencies, provided  that
you  have  been given a written warning and not less than 15 (fifteen)
days to correct such performance deficiencies.

AMRESCO,  like  any  publicly  traded organization,  cannot  guarantee
continued  employment through June 30, 2000.  If  your  employment  is
terminated prior to June 30, 2000 other than by you voluntarily or  by
AMRESCO  for  Cause, you will receive such Retention Bonus  within  15
(fifteen) days of the date of your termination.

As  this particular bonus plan is restricted to certain key employees,
it   is   necessary  that  you  keep  the  terms  of  this   agreement
confidential.   You  may  disclose the existence  and  terms  of  this
agreement only to your spouse, accountant, the IRS, and to others only
if  required by law.  Failure to keep the terms and conditions of this
agreement  confidential will be considered gross  misconduct  and  may
result  in forfeiture of your Retention Bonus or termination  of  your
employment,  or both.  If you have further questions,  please  do  not
hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,



Randolph E. Brown
President - Commercial Finance