alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23907-23908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-518-021]


PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of 
Negotiated Rate

May 4, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest 
Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1-A., Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 7 and 
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 7A GTN requests that these tariff sheets 
become effective May 1, 2001.
    GTN states that these sheets are being filed to reflect the 
implementation of one negotiated rate agreement.
    GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and

[[Page 23908]]

interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of 
paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11782 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DONALD RYDELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1726

[October 15, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John J. Murphy, III, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 08-21318 CF10A.

Donald Rydell, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT01-16-000]

Take notice that on April 27, 2001, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership (Great Lakes) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, proposed to become effective January 1, 2001:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 3

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 3B

Great Lakes states that the tariff sheets listed above are being filed to revise the system and zone maps included in Great Lakes' tariff pursuant to § 154.106(c) of the Commission's regulations. The revisions to the maps reflect the addition of the Marenisco meter station to Great Lakes System and 14.1 miles of looping on the Sault Mainline Extension.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11652 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
YP.Net,  Inc.  10-QSB  March  31,  2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     107,650
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,657,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         3,619,049
<PP&E>                                     676,326
<DEPRECIATION>                             186,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           8,735,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    3,970,258
<BONDS>                                  2,018,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500
<COMMON>                                    40,902
<OTHER-SE>                               5,654,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             8,735,687
<SALES>                                  3,826,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,826,077
<CGS>                                    1,653,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,172,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           934,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         187,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,051,426
<INCOME-TAX>                              (100,494)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,238,728
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,151,920
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .030
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .030


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 65 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 65 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.x

                            ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE
               HUFFY CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL/EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN

         WHEREAS, Huffy Corporation (the "Sponsor") maintains the Huffy
Corporation Supplemental/Excess Benefit Plan (the "Plan") effective January 1,
1988; and

         WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Sponsor adopts the following amendment to the Plan
effective as of February 15, 2001:

I.       Exhibit B to the Plan shall be amended by restating paragraph (b) under
         the definition of "Actuarial Equivalent" to read as follows:

         (2)      For Early Retirement, Disability Retirement and Deferred
                  Vested Retirement, a Participant's Accrued Retirement Pension
                  will be reduced by 3% for each full year (pro-rated to 1/4%
                  per month) that benefits commence prior to his Normal
                  Retirement Date.

II.      In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has caused this instrument to be
executed as of this 16th day of February, 2001.

                                        HUFFY CORPORATION

                                        By:
                                           -----------------------------

                                        Title:
                                              --------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2015

t0420

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2015

149569

AARON CLOUTIER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 149569

COA: 319636 

KIRK A. METZGER,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baylake Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas L.
Herlache, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(1) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Thomas L. Herlache
--------------------------
Thomas L. Herlache
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 20, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       94
#### Elliott M. Epstein et al., Respondents, v George R. Ruditz, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for libel, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the *837Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), dated December 2, 1987, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to dismiss the fourth, sixth, and eighth affirmative defenses asserted in the defendant’s answer and denied the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to dismiss the fourth affirmative defense asserted in the defendant’s answer, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to dismiss the fourth affirmative defense; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

On this appeal, the defendant argues, *inter alia,*that the Supreme Court erred in dismissing several of the affirmative defenses contained in his answer. Since the controversial letter authored by the defendant was not a communication made in the course of a judicial proceeding, we conclude that the Supreme Court properly dismissed the defendant’s sixth affirmative defense based on absolute privilege *(see, Kenny v Cleary,*47 AD2d 531; *cf., Toker v Pollak,*44 NY2d 211, 219). We also affirm the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the defendant’s eighth affirmative defense based on "probable cause”. However, insofar as the defendant has a statutory right to raise the defense of truth *(see,*Civil Rights Law § 78), we find that the Supreme Court should not have dismissed the defendant’s fourth affirmative defense based on truth. Accordingly, we reinstate that affirmative defense.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to dismiss the defendant’s fifth affirmative defense based, on qualified privilege. We are of the view that material questions of fact exist in this record regarding, *inter alia,*whether the allegedly defamatory statements were made with malice or reckless indifference to the truth *(see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center,*64 NY2d 851, 853). Therefore, the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, based on the affirmative defense of qualified privilege, was properly denied.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contention in support of his motion for summary judgment and find it to be without merit *(see, Rinaldi v Holt, Rinehart & Winston,*42 NY2d 369, 381-382, *cert denied*434 US 969; *Kaminester v Weintraub,*131 AD2d 440). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Hooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 41 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 41 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT
                        --------------------------------


Image Entertainment, Inc.
Chatsworth, California


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-43241, 33-55393 and 33-57336) all on Form S-8 of Image Entertainment, Inc. of
our report dated June 1, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Image Entertainment, Inc. as of March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2001, and the related
schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K
of Image Entertainment, Inc.



                                                          /s/ KPMG LLP



Los Angeles, California
June 27, 2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FARHI SAEED BIN MOHAMMED, :

et al., :

:

Petitioner, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 05-1347 (GK)

:

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Court’s February 25, 2009, Order in Al-Adahi v. Obama, Civ.

No. 05-280 [Dkt. No. 291], it is hereby

ORDERED, that by no later than 5:00 p.m., March 13, 2009, Respondents shall submit a

Response containing the requested refinement of their position as to the appropriate definition of

“enemy combatant.” Respondents are also required to indicate what, if any, response they have to

footnote one of the very recent Court of Appeals decision in Kiyemba v. Obama, No. 08-5424, slip

op. at 3 n.1 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 18, 2009).

February 25, 2009 /s/ 

Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge

Copies via ECF to all counsel of record
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1559

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY; RICHARD LILLEY, 

Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services; SCOTT ECKHARDT, Director 

of Student Conduct and Title IX Coordinator; ERIC WASHINGTON, Student 

Conduct Administrator; SARAH MORALES, CCBC Philosophy Coordinator of 

Essex & Dundalk Campuses; PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:19-cv-02575-GLR)

Submitted: May 22, 2023 Decided: June 8, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Doe, Appellant Pro Se. Jordan F. Dunham, Clifford Bernard Geiger, KOLLMAN & 

SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1559 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/08/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff filed a civil complaint alleging that Defendants engaged in disability 

discrimination and retaliation, in violation of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 

29 U.S.C. § 794. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s orders dismissing his 

complaint for failure to state a claim, denying his motion to file under a pseudonym, and 

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Doe v. Cmty. Coll. of Balt. Cnty., 

No. 1:19-cv-02575-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2020 & Apr. 15, 2021). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1559 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/08/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
TKP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0395

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GLEN JOHN GLENN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including July 6, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Laurie McKinnon

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 1 2020

06/01/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0395
# C_2004322EN.01000701.xml

| 29.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/7

---

COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2004/C 322/03)

| Document | Part | Date | Title |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COM(2004) 574 | | 27.8.2004 | COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION responding to the observations and recommendations of the high-level Panel of independent experts concerning the new instruments of the 6th Framework Programme |

Document

Part

Date

Title

COM(2004) 574

27.8.2004

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION responding to the observations and recommendations of the high-level Panel of independent experts concerning the new instruments of the 6th Framework Programme

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex.

---
Exhibit 32.1



LASER MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, INC.



Section 1350 Certification



In connection with the periodic report of LASER Mortgage Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William J. Michaelcheck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Med Gen, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report'), I, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul B. Kravitz
-------------------------------
Paul B. Kravitz,
Principal Executive Officer


July 15, 2004
----

----

| 1.  | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the LP. |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 25, 2009                                                                                                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                   |
| /s/      Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                            |
| Michael      A. Reisner                                                                                                                |
| Co-Chief      Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON      Capital Corp. General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |