alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009116EN.01000501.xml

| 21.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 116/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28.1.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 29/09 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Modification du dispositif de renforcement des fonds propres des banques |
| Legal basis | Article 6, III de la loi no 2008-1061 du 16 octobre 2008 de finances rectificative pour le financement de l'économie |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Aid to remedy serious disturbances in the economy |
| Form of aid | Other forms of equity intervention |
| Budget | EUR 21 500 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 4.12.2008-4.6.2009 |
| Economic sectors | Financial intermediation |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Société de prise de participation de l'Etat |
| FRANCE |

Date of adoption of the decision

28.1.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 29/09

Member State

France

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Modification du dispositif de renforcement des fonds propres des banques

Legal basis

Article 6, III de la loi no 2008-1061 du 16 octobre 2008 de finances rectificative pour le financement de l'économie

o

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Aid to remedy serious disturbances in the economy

Form of aid

Other forms of equity intervention

Budget

EUR 21 500 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

4.12.2008-4.6.2009

Economic sectors

Financial intermediation

Name and address of the granting authority

Société de prise de participation de l'Etat

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/index.htm

---
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Steven D. Jennerjohn, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 of Baylake Corp (the Registrant);2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
an 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: March 15, 2005 /s/ Steven D. JennerjohnSteven D. JennerjohnSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 22 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 22 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1858 

PATRICIA LEE GREENWAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JACK DYE; A. H. SKARDON; T. T. THOMPSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

and

IVAN J. TONEY; KIM R. VARNER; JAMES W. SEGURA;

JANE DOE; LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER; NELA

LAUGHRIDGE,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (6:05-cv-01736-GRA)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 18, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia Lee Greenway, Appellant Pro Se. Debra J. Gammons, CITY OF

GREENVILLE, Greenville, South Carolina; Marshall Winn, WYCHE,

BURGESS, FREEMAN & PARHAM, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; David W.

Hartman, CLARKSON, WALSH, RHENEY & TERRELL, PA, Greenville, South
- 2 -

Carolina; Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM &

LANEY, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Lee Greenway appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised Greenway that failure to file

timely specific objections to the recommendation could waive

appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Greenway failed to file

specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins,

766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140 (1985). Greenway has waived appellate review by failing

to file specific objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
- 3 -

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Isiah JAMES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee, and Jon Ozmint, Respondent.

No. 13-6309.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Isiah James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tommy Evans, Jr., South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Service, Columbia, South Carolina; Donald John *226Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Isiah James, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b) and 59(e) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appeal-ability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that James has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny James’ motion for abeyance, deny as moot the Warden’s motion to dismiss the motion to stay, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1249. ROBERT GENE CULLUM, III v. LINDSAY MORGAN

BUCHANAN.

Robert Gene Cullum, III, defendant in the case below, appeals from the trial

court’s order of February 5, 2024. In addition to this direct appeal, Cullum also filed

an application for discretionary review of the same trial court order. We denied the

application. See Case No. A24D0273 (Order of April 3, 2024). Our previous denial

of Cullum’s application for discretionary appeal constitutes an adjudication on the

merits; the doctrine of res judicata thus bars this direct appeal. See Northwest Social

& Civic Club, Inc. v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v.

Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 260-261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). Accordingly, this

appeal is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 14, 2024

08/14/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Kirkland, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), rendered November 1, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). There is no basis to disturb the jury’s determination crediting the testimony of the prosecution’s witnesses and not crediting the defendant’s testimony *(see, People v Shapiro,*117 AD2d 688, *lv denied*67 NY2d 950). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
#                                                                         OUT WITH THE OLD, IN WITH THE NEW ... RADIOS!                                                                    

##### by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Tatyana Freeman 

14 December 2022

            SLIDESHOW | 1 images | HM-14 Conducts Sundown Flight                    Aviation Electronics Technician 3rd Class Jared Saunders, assigned to the “Vanguard” of Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron 14 (HM-14), prepares to provide taxiing signals to an MH-53 “Sea Dragon” helicopter prior to the squadron’s last flights Dec. 8, 2022. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Malachi Lakey)        

                    HM-14 Conducts Sundown Flight                                            1 of 1                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

Tags:
**AIRLANT**FlyNavyLANT**Flightline**Radios
Case 1:07-cv-05315-AKH Document 35 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 

IN RE VIVENDI UNIVERSAL, S.A. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

07 Civ. 5742 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 02 Civ. 5571 (RJH) (HBP) 

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––x 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Please enter the appearance of Mark S. Arisohn, a member of the bar of this Court, as 

counsel for Plaintiffs Capitalia Asset Management SGR S.p.A. and Capitalia Investment 

Management S.A. in the above-captioned action. 

Dated: New York, New York Respectfully submitted, 

January 10, 2008 

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

 By: /s/ Eric Belfi__ 

 Eric Belfi (EB-8895) 

 Mark S. Arisohn (MA-2364) 

 140 Broadway 

 New York, New York 10005 

 Telephone: 212-907-0700 

 Facsimile: 212-818-0477 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Capitalia Asset 

 Management SGR S.p.A. and Capitalia 

 Investment Management S.A. 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 18 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on January 10, 2008, I caused the foregoing Notice of Appearance to be 

electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court through the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send 

notification of such public filing to all counsel registered to receive such notice, and to be sent by 

U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, to the following counsel: 

Michael T. Reynolds 

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 

Worldwide Plaza 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Michael J. Malone 

King & Spalding LLP 

1185 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Michael E. Swartz, Esq. 

Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP 

919 Third Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

 /s/ Mark S. Arisohn 

Mark S. Arisohn (MA-2364) 

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH Document 18 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05414-AKH     Document 5      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05414-AKH     Document 5      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05414-AKH     Document 5      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05363-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-10 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-10 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-10 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-10 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-10 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-10 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-10 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Image Entertainment, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff M. Framer, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | Based
on my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
               section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  June 29, 2007 | /s/ JEFF M. FRAMER     
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Jeff M. Framer         
|                     | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# C_2009017EN.01000601.xml

| 23.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/6

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 17/05)

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Shetland Mainland (Tingwall/Sumburgh) and the islands of Foula, Fair Isle, Out Skerries and Papa Stour |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 August 2009-31 March 2013 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 2 months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Shetland Islands Council |
| Infrastructure Services Department |
| Transport Services |
| Commercial Road |
| LERWICK |
| Shetland ZE1 0LX |
| Tel. (44) 1595 744 868 |
| Fax (44) 1595 744 880 |
| E-mail: michael.craigie@shetland.gov.uk |
| (Contact: Michael Craigie, Head of Transport, Shetland Islands Council) |

Member State

United Kingdom

Concerned route

Shetland Mainland (Tingwall/Sumburgh) and the islands of Foula, Fair Isle, Out Skerries and Papa Stour

Period of validity of the contract

1 August 2009-31 March 2013

Deadline for submission of tenders

2 months after the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Shetland Islands Council

Infrastructure Services Department

Transport Services

Commercial Road

LERWICK

Shetland ZE1 0LX

Tel. (44) 1595 744 868

Fax (44) 1595 744 880

E-mail: michael.craigie@shetland.gov.uk

(Contact: Michael Craigie, Head of Transport, Shetland Islands Council)

---
Clear All

        21 November 2022    

                    Ford’s first CO returns for USS Gerald R. Ford’s first deployment                 
                Rear Adm. John F. Meier, the first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford’s (CVN 78) first commanding officer and current commander of Naval Air Force Atlantic, visited Ford during the ship’s first deployment, Nov. 10-11, 2022.            

        20 September 2022    

                    USS Wasp plank owners tour ship they brought to life                  
                NORFOLK, Va. - After 32 years away from Wasp (LHD 1), the first commanding officer returned with other plankowners to take a walk down memory lane. From seaman to chief petty officer, retired Sailors walked the decks of Wasp once again. With the guidance of the current crew, they toured the ship            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

p0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

142946

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142946 COA: 290131 Saginaw CC: 08-030280-FC DEONTAE TRAVOHN DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.
Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 20-2 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charley Daniel PARKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-30085.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 6, 2013.

Filed May 22, 2013.

Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Bruce Miyake, Assistant U.S., Jill *566Aiko Otake, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Russell Victor Leonard, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alan Zarky, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tacoma, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER *

The Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Moot, filed on May 10, 2013, is GRANTED. All pending motions are denied as moot. A certified copy of this order sent to the district court shall constitute the mandate.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.