alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EDWARD D. WILFORD

Attorney at Law

20 Vesey Street - Suite 400

New York, New York 10007

(212) 528-2741 Fax (212) 964-2926

September 20, 2007

VIA FACSIMILE

Hon. William H. Pauley

United States District Judge 

Southern District of New York

Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse

500 Pearl Street

New York, New York 10007

Re: United States v. Richard Lord

 07 Cr. 554 (WHP)

Dear Judge Pauley:

I am writing to the court to request an adjournment of the sentence in the above

referenced matter. The sentence is currently scheduled for September 28, 2007, however I am

currently on trial before the Hon. Loretta A. Preska in the Southern District of New York in the

matter of United States v. David Gonzalez, et al, and I expect the trial to last until October 1,

2007. Because of the tremendous legal issues involved in the trial I have been unable to meet

with Mr. Lord and review the PSR and prepare a sentencing memorandum on his behalf.

Therefore it is respectfully requested that the court adjourn Mr. Lord’s sentencing until

October 15, 2007. The defendant will submit a sentencing memorandum by October 5, 2007 and

be prepared for sentencing on that date.

Should the court have any questions or require additional information please do not

hesitate to contact me.

Yours etc.,

Edward D. Wilford

Edward D. Wilford

EDW/nes

cc: Jillian Berman, Esq.

Mr. Richard Lord

Case 1:07-cr-00554-WHP Document 12 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-01-020]


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: International Trade Commission.

TIME AND DATE: May 18, 2001 at 2 p.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered:

    1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-929-931 (Preliminary) (Silicomanganese from 
India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela)--briefing and vote. (The Commission 
is currently scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary 
of Commerce on May 21, 2001; Commissioners' opinions are currently 
scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on May 29, 
2001.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    1. Document No. GC-01-042: Regarding Inv. No. 337-TA-429 (Certain 
Bar Clamps, Bar Clamp Pads, and Related Packaging, Display, and Other 
Materials).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 4, 2001.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11828 Filed 5-7-01; 2:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND,

Appellant

______________________ 

2022-2251

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/014,306.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

THEODORE FREDERICK SHIELLS, Shiells Law Firm PC, 

Dallas, TX, argued for appellant. 

 MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by 

OMAR FAROOQ AMIN, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN 

RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Case: 22-2251 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 09/10/2024
 PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 10, 2024

Date

Case: 22-2251 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 09/10/2024
#                                                                         50 Years of Building and Restoring Maritime Capabilities: Celebrating the Underwater Construction Teams Anniversary                                                                    

##### by Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Public Affairs

14 February 2024https://www.necc.usff.navy.mil/

Tags:
**SEABEE DIVER**SEABEE**Naval Construction Force**NECC**NECF**UCT**Underwater Construction Team One**Underwater Construction Team Two
EXHIBIT 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”), I,Joseph D. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                       of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph D. Moore                             Joseph D. MooreExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerNovember 9, 2005
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 184 

To transfer administrative jurisdiction of certain Federal lands from the 

United States Army Corps of Engineers to the United States Bureau 

of Indian Affairs, to take such lands into trust for the Winnebago 

Tribe of Nebraska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, and Mr. BACON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To transfer administrative jurisdiction of certain Federal 

lands from the United States Army Corps of Engineers 

to the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, to take 

such lands into trust for the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Winnebago Land 

5 Transfer Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 184 IH

1 SEC. 2. LAND TO BE TAKEN INTO TRUST. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to all valid existing rights, 

3 all right, title, and interest (including improvements and 

4 appurtenances) of the United States in and to the Federal 

5 lands described in subsection (b), the Federal lands are 

6 declared to be part of the Winnebago Reservation created 

7 by the Treaty between the United States and the Winne8 bago Tribe in 1865 and shall be held in trust by the 

9 United States for the benefit of the Winnebago Tribe of 

10 Nebraska subject to the same terms and conditions as 

11 those lands described in the Treaty with the Winnebago 

12 Tribe, 1865 (14 Stat. 671). 

13 (b) FEDERAL LANDS DESCRIBED.—The Federal 

14 lands described in this subsection are as follows: 

15 (1) That portion of Tract No. 119, the descrip16 tion of which is filed in U.S. District Court for the 

17 Northern District of Iowa (Western Division), Civil 

18 Case No. 70–C–3015–W, executed May 11, 1973, 

19 said tract being situated in Section 8 and the accre20 tion land thereto, the Southwest Quarter of Section 

21 9, the West Half of Section 16, the East Half of 

22 Section 17, Township 86 North, Range 47 West of 

23 the Fifth Principal Meridian, Woodbury County, 

24 Iowa, lying Easterly of the Nebraska/Iowa State 

25 Line and Southerly of the Eastern extension of the 

26 North line of the Winnebago Reservation. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 184 IH

1 (2) All of Tract 210, in Iowa, the description of 

2 which is filed in a Federal condemnation action in 

3 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of 

4 Iowa (Western Division), in Civil Case No. 70–C– 

5 3015–W. 

6 (3) All of Tract 113, in Iowa, the description of 

7 which is filed in a Federal condemnation action in 

8 U.S. District Court for the State of Nebraska, in 

9 Civil Case No. 70–C–03498. 

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

11 This Act shall be effective on the date it is enacted. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ERIC L. WILEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-690

[June 7, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 432008CF000073A.

Eric L. Wiley, Lake City, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 1

 Plaintiff Original Civil Action Second Civil Action

1 Abarca, Edgar 06cv1648 07cv1550

2 Aguilar, Luis 06cv12701 07cv1553

3 Alvarracin, Jose 06cv14456 07cv1556

4 Annunziato, Phillip 06cv14466 07cv1557

5 Arbelaez, Fabio 05cv10747 07cv1558

6 Arias, Julio 06cv1340 07cv1559

7 Aristizabal, Enid 06cv4377 07cv1560

8 Avila, Cesar 06cv1588 07cv1563

9 Bajguz, Aleksander 06cv2528 07cv1566

10 Banda, Ivan 06cv14483 07cv1567

11 Banda, Nestor 06cv14484 07cv1568

12 Benitez, Luis 06cv13799 07cv1570

13 Calero, Ivan 06cv1650 07cv1575

14 Campuzano, Consuelo 06cv14529 07cv1579

15 Cardenas, Edison 06cv14533 07cv1580

16 Claret, Cecilia 06cv14554 07cv1591

17 Colucci, Christopher 06cv14564 07cv1592

18 Criollo, Jose 05cv1104 07cv1547

19 Deleon, Isabel 06cv14593 07cv1600

20 Dutan, Elvia 06cv5504 07cv1606

21 Encalada, Jorge 05cv10737 07cv1607

22 Flynn, James 06cv14652 07cv1610

23 Gallo, Juan 06cv14670 07cv1614

24 Garcia, Jose 06cv2218 07cv1616

25 Garcia, Viviana 06cv14671 07cv1617

26 Gomez, Gildardo 06cv2285 07cv1621

27 Hernandez, Robert 06cv14719 07cv1624

28 Hurtado, William 06cv10781 07cv1625

29 Idrovo, Edgar 06cv11025 07cv1627

30 Kowalczyk, Adam 06cv2252 07cv1642

31 Kukacki, Kazimierz 06cv14781 07cv1643

32 Lopez, Milton 06cv14805 07cv1653

33 Maldonado, Mariana 06cv1786 07cv1656

34 McCann, James 06cv14847 07cv1660

35 Mendez, Edgar 05cv1180 07cv1663

36 Moreno, Sandra 06cv14901 07cv1670

37 Narvaez, Carlos 06cv2221 07cv1672

38 Ocampo, Orlando 05cv9161 07cv1673

39 Pachay, Maximo 05cv9041 07cv1678

40 Padilla, Carmen 05cv9822 07cv1679

41 Pena, Gabriel 05cv1385 07cv1681

42 Pina, Napoleon 06cv12413 07cv1685

43 Polo, Jose 05cv1418 07cv1686

44 Porowski, Piotr 06cv3850 07cv1687

45 Reyes, Angel 06cv14998 07cv1691

46 Rivera, Sonia 06cv6234 07cv1692

47 Robles, Maria 06cv11257 07cv1693

48 Rodriguez, Rosa 06cv845 07cv1695

1

Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 20-2 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Exhibit 1

49 Rojas, Mario 06cv5786 07cv1697

50 Savage, Gertrudis 05cv9951 07cv1701

51 Sumba, Samuel 05cv1783 07cv1710

52 Valenzuela, Mario 06cv14159 07cv1718

53 Villafuerte, Julio 06cv1652 07cv1724

54 Vivar, Rosa 06cv997 07cv1726

2

Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 20-2 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
In the Senate of the United States, 

November 12, 2019. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1865) entitled ‘‘An Act to require the Secretary 

of the Treasury to mint a coin in commemoration of the 

opening of the National Law Enforcement Museum in the 

District of Columbia, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with 

the following 

AMENDMENT: 

At the end, add the following: 

1 SEC. 9. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES. 

2 The Secretary shall take such actions as may be nec3 essary to ensure that— 

4 (1) minting and issuing coins under this Act 

5 will not result in any net cost to the United States 

6 Government; and 

7 (2) no funds, including applicable surcharges, 

8 are disbursed to any recipient designated in section 

9 7 until the total cost of designing and issuing all of 
2 

† HR 1865 EAS 

1 the coins authorized by this Act (including labor, ma2 terials, dies, use of machinery, overhead expenses, 

3 marketing, and shipping) is recovered by the United 

4 States Treasury, consistent with sections 5112(m) and 

5 5134(f) of title 31, United States Code. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H.R. 1865 

AMENDMENT
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements Nos. 33-39632, 2-76027, 333-53305, 333-58735,333-58733, 333-104754, and 333-118277 on Forms S-8 and Registration StatementsNo. 333-09657 on Form S-3 of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporationof our report dated March 31, 2005, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation as ofDecember 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2004 and related financial statement schedule, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Evans &Sutherland Computer Corporation.

 

 

**KPMG LLP**

 
| Salt  Lake City, Utah |
|-----------------------|
| March 31,  2005  |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 36-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 36-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 36-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 36-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 4
Tracey Lyn Jarzombek, Esq., (TJ-3972)

White & McSpedon, P.c.

875 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 800

New York, NY 10001

212-564-6633

Attorneys for Defendants:

CITIGROUP lISIHIA CITIBANK, N.A. (solely in connection

with their alleged ownership or occupancy of 120 Broadway)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - )(

PETER CUSICK (AND WIFE, MARILYN CUSICK)

21 MC 102 (AKH)

Index No.: 07-CV-05347

Plaintiffs,

-againstNOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER

TO MAST COMPLAINT

120 BROADWAY CONDOMINIUM

(CONDO #871), ET. AL.,

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Defendants.

- - -- - - - - - -- - -- - - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - -- - -- -- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - )(

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that defendants, CITIGROUP lISIHIA CITIBANK, N.A. (solely in

connection with their alleged ownership or occupancy of 120 Broadway), by their attorneys, White &

McSpedon, P.c., as and for their Response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, hereby

adopt their Answer to Master Complaint dated July 31, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In Re

World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litgation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, the defendants, CITIGROUP lISIHIA CITIBANK, N.A. (solely in connection

with their alleged ownership or occupancy of 120 Broadway), demand judgment dismissing the abovecaptioned action as against them, together with their costs and disbursements and for such other and

further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 17 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York

September 5, 2008

Yours etc.,

WHITE & MCSPEDON, P.c.

By:

Tracey Lyn ar mbe, E . (3972)

875 Aven of the Americas, Suite 800

New York, NY 10001

(212) 564-6633

Attorneys for Defendants

CITIGROUP I/S/H/A CITIBANK, N.A. (solely in

connection with their alleged ownership or

occupancy of 120 Broadway)

TO:

(Service via electronic Pacer filing)

WORBY GRONER & NAPOLI BERN, LLP

Plaintiffs Liaison

In Re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation

115 Broadway, 1ih Floor

New York, NY 10006

212-267-3700

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATTA

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, NY 10279

All Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 17 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2


























CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the “ Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David C. Benoit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   David C. Benoit


David C. Benoit


Chief Financial Officer


March 11, 2011
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131629 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131629 COA: 259700 Alger CC: 03-001558-FH CLIFFORD EDWARD BRITTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
(82 South. 16)

#### DECATUR DRUG CO. v. PRICE et al.

(8 Div. 168.)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 17, 1919.

Rehearing Denied May 22, 1919.

Fraudulent Conveyances <&wkey;300(3) — Suit against Husband and Wife — Consideration Moving from Wife — Evidence.

In suit against husband and wife to impose a lien for certain trust funds sought to be recovered on real estate conveyed to the wife by third persons, because acquired or paid for by the husband with funds of a partnership or corporation in which he was connected, evidence that consideration for money paid for such real estate moved from the wife, not the husband, *held*to sustain decree for her.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; Robert C. Brickell, Judge.

Action by the Decatur Drug Company against E. H. Price and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

E. W. Godbey, of Decatur, for appellant.

Eyster & Eyster, of Albany, for appellees.

MAYFIELD, J.

The facts of this case are very similar to the facts in the case of Brock v. Price et al., 80 South. 402,1 recently decided by this court. That was a suit by Brock against these same appellees, and involved the same transactions and dealings of these appellees, as to the same business in which the appellees were engaged, and in fact much of the evidence in the two cases is identical, the same depositions or copies thereof being used in both cases. Each case seeks to fasten a lien on the property of the wife, because acquired or paid for by the husband with funds and moneys of a partnership or corporation in which he was connected. In other words, each case seeks to follow trust funds into the property of the wife, and have a lien declared and enforced upon her property.. The defense in each case was that the property was not so acquired or paid for with trust funds, but with funds of the wife. So the two cases are very similar, and much of the proof identical — both that of complainant and respondent.

We find no proof in the record which will justify a change of findings as to what or whose funds purchased or paid for the property of the wife. A further examination of both records confirms us in the .conclusion that the trial court decided both eases correctly, and that the complainant in his proof to establish the case made by his bill, and that the proof of respondents, show the property was acquired with funds of the wife, and not those of the partnership or corporation of which E. H. Price. was a manager or officer.

It would serve no good purpose to further discuss the law or facts as to this case. It can well be decided on the decision of Brock v. E. H. Price et al., 80 South. 402.1 That case was thoroughly considered, both on the original and rehearing, and has been again re-examined to compare it with this, and we are satisfied that both cases have been decided correctly on the evidence as shown by these records.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1

202 Ala. 320.