alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                       JOINDER TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                              AND RELATED DOCUMENTS

         Reference is made to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August
22, 1997, by and among Park `N View, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and the "Purchasers" identified therein (the "Stock Purchase
Agreement").

         The undersigned has agreed to purchase 23,000 shares of the Company's
Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Shares") at a price of
Eight Dollars ($8.00) per share. In connection with the purchase of such Shares,
the undersigned hereby agrees to become: (a) a party to the Stock Purchase
Agreement, as a "Purchaser" and to be bound by all the terms and conditions
thereof; (b) a party to the Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as
of August 22, 1997, by and among the Company and the "Investors" as identified
therein, as one of the "Series C Holders" as identified therein and to be bound
by all the terms and conditions thereof; (c) a party to the Amendment to
Securities Restriction Agreement, dated as of August 22, 1997 by and among the
Company and the "Securityholders" as identified therein, as one of the "Series C
Holders" as identified therein and to be bound by all the terms and conditions
thereof, (d) a party to the Amendment to Amended and Restated Securityholders'
Agreement and Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 22, 1997 by and among the
Company and the "Investors" as identified therein, as one of the "Series C
Holders" as identified therein and to be bound by all the terms and conditions
thereof, and (e) the Investor Questionnaire as a "Purchaser" as identified
therein. The undersigned's name will be added to Exhibit A to the Stock Purchase
Agreement and to Exhibit C to the Amendment to Amended and Restated
Securityholders' Agreement and Exchange Agreement.

         Notwithstanding any term or condition of the Stock Purchase Agreement
or any other agreement referenced herein to the contrary, the undersigned
acknowledges and agrees that the Company's representations and warranties in the
Stock Purchase Agreement and each other agreement referenced herein were made as
of the date of the Stock Purchase Agreement and have not been updated as of the
date hereof. The undersigned acknowledges and agrees that the Company has not
made any representations and/or warranties to the undersigned in connection with
the sale of the Shares to the undersigned. The undersigned hereby waives any
claim that the undersigned and/or his successors or assigns may have as a result
of the inaccuracy or incompletion of any of the representations or warranties
made by the Company in the Stock Purchase Agreement or any other agreement
referenced herein.

                             /s/ Robert P. May                  
                             -----------------------------
                             Robert May

                             Effective March 1, 1999
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 33-53211, 333-94525, 333-51702, 333-88544, and 333-117494) of Connecticut Water Service,Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2005 relating to thefinancial statements, financialstatement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
## Breadcrumb

-  Advanced Research Computing (ARC) 

#           Machine Access      

      By Advanced Research Computing (ARC)

-  Home 
-  Science Stories 
-  USGS Supercomputers 
-  Publications 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 

Need more computing power?

We provide USGS scientists with access to high-performance computing (HPC) resources.

There are three on-premises USGS supercomputers housed in Sioux Falls, SD:
                            - Denali is the flagship USGS supercomputer for large-scale models.
                            - Tallgrass is a prototype system designed for artificial intelligence and machine learning workloads.
                            - Hovenweep replaces Yeti as the workhorse USGS supercomputer for general-purpose HPC workloads.

For more information or to get started using Denali, Tallgrass, or Hovenweep, contact us at hpc@usgs.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         203,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               203,866
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 782,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,368
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     736,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   782,893
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,265
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               285,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (218,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (218,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (218,029)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 24 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 24 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Ron E. Hooper, certify that1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tidelands Royalty Trust “B” for which Bankof America, N.A. acts as Trustee;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s Principal Accounting Officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s Principal Accounting Officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: March 30, 2006 /s/ RON E. HOOPER         Ron E. Hooper    Senior Vice President Royalty Management onbehalf of Bank of America Private Bank, not inits individual capacity but solely as the trusteeof Tidelands Royalty Trust “B”  
27
Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ImageMax, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark P.
Glassman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company as of September 30, 2002 (the last date of the period covered by the
Report).



/s/ Mark P. Glassman
-----------------------
Mark P. Glassman
Chief Executive Officer


November 13, 2002
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Christopher S. Alexander, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HypercomCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:   a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;   b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):   a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and   b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: May 7 , 2004   By: /s/ C.S. Alexander    Christopher S. Alexander    Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00371

- CR

Arthur THOMAS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 155

- CR

Honorable Sergio J. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 15, 2020.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3383 

_____________________________

DAVID NEFORES,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, and MICHAEL 

MCCORD, individually,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

May 28, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Marie A. Mattox and Ashley N. Richardson of Marie A. Mattox, 

P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

William Peter Martin of Dennis, Jackson, Martin & Fontela, P.A., 

Tallahassee; Ashley Moody, Attorney General; Anthony Johnson, 

Christopher Claude Torres, and Britt Thomas, Assistant 

Attorneys General, Tallahassee; Dan Johnson, General Counsel, 

Department of Corrections, for Appellees.
## Cause**NoPO/3^^ 73** **THE STATE** **OF TEXAS** **IN THE** **DISTRICT COURT** 

### VS.**^7^7 JUDICIAL DISTRICT** 

# dt)llllV>**BEXAR COUNTY,** **TEXAS MOTION** **TO DISMISS** **APPEAL -o** **±-10**

### TO**THE HONORABLE** **JUDGE OF** **SAID COURT:** **££- JJ** 

### xo

## Come**now A—^5** **<^ co3/^** **Appellant in** **the above** **styled and** **numbered cause,** **and requests** **that this** **cause on** **appeal be** **dismissed and** **in support** **of said** **motion would** **show the** **Court the** **following: I.** 

## Appellant**was convicted** **under the** **trial court** **case number** **on the** **/<£? day of** **of the** **charge of** **Texas Penal/Health** **Safety Code.** 

## On**the -3l>/** **day of** **violation of** **Section****3/*p/****of the** **lnn! «nve** **notice of** **appeal in** **sc.id cajsc** **to the** **-Ith Com** **of Appeals,** **S<in Antonio,** **Texas. III.** **Appellant is** **aware of** **his right** **to continue** **to prosecute** **his appeal,** **and is** **aware of** **the consequences** **should the** **appeal be** **dismissed. However,** **Appellant desires** **to withdraw** **from the** **appellate process** **at this** **time and** **no longer** **wishes to** **pursue any** **changes in** **the trial** **court's verdict** **or decision.** 

### WHEREFORE,**PREMISES CONSIDERED,** **Appellant prays** **that his** **notice of** **appeal be** **dismissed by** **the Appellate** **Court. Respectfully** **submitted, AvUomey** **for Appellate** **Appellate CERTIFICATE** **OF SERVICE** 

## I,**hereby certify** **ihat on** **this the** **£*"?****day of** **ft■£-£-- true** **and correct** **copy of the** **above and** **foregoing Motion** **to Dismiss** **Appeal was** **transmitted**

### to**office of** **the Bexar** **County District** **Attorney, Criminal** **Justice Center,** **101 W.** **Nueva, San** **Antonio, Texas** **78205 Appellate** **,; -L.** **... CO**
Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 41 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Order entered May 16, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01479-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R.W., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-56410-2010

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s May 12, 2016 opposed motion for extension of time to file brief. 

Appellee’s brief is DUE June 6, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Clear All

        03 May 2024    

                    Carrier Strike Group 12 Holds Change of Command Ceremony                 
                Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 12 held a change of command ceremony at the Pennsylvania House on Naval Station Norfolk, May 3, 2024.            

        03 March 2023    

                    Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group Commences Multi-Week Exercise to Fully Certify as Combat-Deployable U.S. Warship                 
                The Sailors, ships, squadrons and staffs of the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group (GRFCSG) commenced their final deployment certification exercise, Composite Training Unit Exercise (COMPTUEX), March 2.            

        24 October 2022    

                    Carrier Strike Group 4 Exercise Enhances Beginning of Gerald R. Ford Inaugural Deployment with NATO Allies                 
                The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group and ships from three North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries completed a three-week exercise orchestrated by Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 4 called Task Force Exercise (TFEX) 23-2 from Oct. 5 to 23.             

        29 September 2022    

                    USS Gerald R. Ford Set to Depart on First Deployment                 
                NORFOLK, Va. —The Navy's newest and most advanced aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) will deploy and operate alongside a coalition of allied forces together in the Atlantic area of operations, Monday, October 3.            

        25 September 2022    

                    Carrier Strike Group 12 Completes Surface Warfare Advanced Tactical Training                 
                ATLANTIC OCEAN - Carrier Strike Group 12 (CSG 12) completed its Surface Warfare Advanced Tactical Training (SWATT) Sept. 22, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 23-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 23-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors and ShareholdersEvans & Sutherland Computer Corporation

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements Nos. 33-39632, 333-53305, 333-58733,333-104754, and 333-118277 onForm S-8 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-09657 and 333-137637 on Form S-3of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation of our report dated March 6,2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Evans &Sutherland Computer Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit)and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the years then ended, which reportappears in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Evans &Sutherland Computer Corporation.

 

 

/s/ TANNER LC

 

March 6, 2009

Salt Lake City, Utah

 

----
#### UNITED STATES *v.*Stephen Dewayne McCASLIN, [ XXX XX XXXX ], Mess Management Specialist Seaman Apprentice (E-2), U. S. Navy.

NCM 78 1380.

U. S. Navy Court of Military Review.

Sentence Adjudged 23 May 1978.

Decided 28 Feb. 1979.

CAPT Joseph F. Smith, USMCR, Appellate Defense Counsel.

CAPT John P. Hertel, USMC, Appellate Government Counsel.

Before BAUM, MICHEL and GRAN-GER, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted at a special court-martial bench trial of 12 periods of unauthorized absence in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886. He was sentenced on 23 May 1978 to reduction to pay grade E-l, confinement at hard labor for 60 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.

At trial, the defense contended and the Government conceded that appellant spent *92046 days in illegal pre-trial confinement. Accordingly, the military judge ordered an administrative credit of 46 days to be applied against appellant’s adjudged sentence. *United States v. Larner,*1 M.J. 371 (C.M.A. 1976). In taking his action on the record, the convening authority applied this 46-day credit, and subsequently appellant was released from post-trial confinement on 3 June 1978.

Appellant contends, and the Government concedes, that appellant should have been credited with good conduct time for this 46 days, that had he been given such credit he would have been released from confinement 8 days earlier, and that since he was not given such credit, the final 8 days of his confinement at hard labor were illegal. We concur that appellant should have received credit for good time.

As we understand the *Larner*rule, appellant’s 46 days of illegal pretrial confinement should be subtracted from the date upon which he was sentenced, thus providing the artificial sentence-commencement date from which all subsequent computations are based. *See United States v. Heard,*3 M.J. 14, 22 (C.M.A.1977). Appellant is then entitled to good time credit from this constructive date. Using this formula, we conclude that appellant should have been released a week earlier than he was. He has served this time, however, and true relief, *i. e.,*freedom from incarceration, cannot be given. Further, we only presume that appellant would have earned good time during the 46 days with which he is credited. The possible prejudice to appellant from the error in computation is relatively minor, and no further relief is deemed appropriate.

The findings and sentence, as modified below, are affirmed.