alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0145 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0145

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution (COM(2003)0550 - C5-0447/2003 - 2003/0210(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 045 E , 23/02/2006 P. 0074 - 0086 *

P6_TA(2005)0145

Protection of groundwater against pollution ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution (COM(2003)0550 — C5-0447/2003 — 2003/0210(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2003) 0550) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5-0447/2003),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Agriculture (A6-0061/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         104
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,818
<INVENTORY>                                    11,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,111
<PP&E>                                         2,055,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,158,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,186,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          268,407
<BONDS>                                        198,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       72,530
<OTHER-SE>                                     473,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,186,765
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               842,150
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  470,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             22,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                199,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                   73,905
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            125,734
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7545

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY ALFORENZO WALKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00084-AWA-1)

Submitted: January 18, 2018 Decided: January 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Alforenzo Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, United States Attorney, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Alforenzo Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walker has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Walker’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cr-00554-WHP Document 14-4 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BRIAZZ, INC. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Victor D.
Alhadeff, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
|
| |    |  | May 14, 2003                                                                                                                                        

| |  |                                                                                                                      
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Victor D. Alhadeff                                                                                               
| |  |                                                                                                                      
| |  | Victor D. Alhadeff
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the
Board of Directors

27
712 F.2d 1420

#### Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA, Appellant, v. William F. SMITH, et al.

No. 82-1251.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Submitted April 26, 1983.

Decided April 27, 1983.

Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, pro se.

Stanley S. Harris, U.S. Atty., with whom Royce C. Lamberth, R. Craig Lawrence, and Nathan Dodell, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellees.

Carolyn Sabol, Atty., Bureau of Prisons, Pittsburgh, Pa., was also on brief, for appellees.

Before GINSBURG and SCALIA, Circuit Judges, and VAN PELT,* Senior District Judge for Nebraska.

*

 Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 294(d).

Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant asserts the illegality of conditions to which he was exposed as a “holdover” prisoner in various federal institutions; he seeks to represent a class described in his complaint as encompassing “all federal prisoners in the United States.”

The conviction pursuant to which appellant was incarcerated in the federal prison system has been reversed, 684 F.2d 485 (7th Cir.1982), and he has been released from prison. The indictment against him was dismissed on January 20, 1983. Appellees have represented to this court that no further proceedings against appellant are contemplated by the United States at this time. While these developments render appellant’s individual claims moot, he may nonetheless appeal the denial of class certification. If the district court properly de*389nied class certification, however, “[his] claim on the merits must be dismissed as moot.” *United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty,*445 U.S. 388, 404, 100 S.Ct. 1202, 1212, 63 L.Ed.2d 479 (1980). The issue, therefore, is whether the district court correctly denied class certification.

As the district court held, appellant did not qualify as a representative equipped to proceed on behalf of the large and geographically-dispersed class he described. Moreover, the lawsuit he envisioned, involving both national and local practices at diverse institutions across the country, would exceed the proportions of a class action the district court is competent to govern. Class certification, therefore, was appropriately denied leaving appellant with only his moot individual claims, which must be dismissed. *Id.*
Clear All

        20 May 2021    

                    Joint Force Command Norfolk Kicks off Part 1 of NATO’s Steadfast Defender 2021                 
                A dynamic NATO maritime live exercise (LIVEX) has begun off the coast of Portugal with participation from 11 Allied Nations from North America and Europe as a part of Steadfast Defender 2021, May 20.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
audited financial  statements of Starmet Corporation at and for the period ended
September  30,  1999 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               252,000
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      3,735,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         200,000
<INVENTORY>                                        3,735,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   6,628,000
<PP&E>                                            43,756,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    27,645,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    25,856,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             19,761,000
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             479,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         4,241,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      25,856,000
<SALES>                                           25,001,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  25,001,000
<CGS>                                             19,297,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     25,934,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      95,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,414,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,442,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,442,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,442,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.51)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Investools Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ida K. Kane, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

| |  | /s/IDA K. KANEIda K. Kane
Chief Financial Officer
March 14, 2008
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Clear All

        13 February 2023    

                    NECC Recovery Care Management Program Critical to Expeditionary Multidisciplinary Care Team                 
                Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) continues to demonstrate its commitment to the care and resiliency of its members across the force, by focusing on mental health and other critical care areas. The force uses the Recovery Care Management (RCM) program, which provides assistance to injured and            

        01 February 2023    

                    Fourth Navy Expeditionary Logistics Regiment Decommissions After 17 Years of Service                 
                Fourth Navy Expeditionary Logistics Regiment (NELR) held the command’s decommissioning ceremony at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, Jan. 20, 2023.Attendees of the ceremony included Rear Adm. Dennis Collins, Commander, Navy Expeditionary Logistics Support Group; Capt. Andrew Duessel, Commodore,            

        06 September 2022    

                    NECC Hosts NMRTU OIC, Stress Dog During Monthly Training                 
                VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. - Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) hosted the Navy Medicine Readiness & Training Unit (NMRTU) officer in charge (OIC) and her facilities dog, during Professional Development (PRODEV) training onboard Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story (JEBLCFS) Aug. 19,            

        21 March 2022    

                    Navy, Coast Guard test unmanned rescue craft                 
                Maritime Expeditionary Security Squadron (MSRON) 4 and United States Coast Guard Cutter Razorbill, evaluated the Unmanned Diesel Greenough Advanced Rescue Craft (UD-GARC) in the Chesapeake Bay, Feb. 8, during Exercise Solid Curtain 2022.The joint team tested the technology during a simulated            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 3-2 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
Clear All

        17 May 2022    

                    SECNAV, CNO visit USS George Washington                 
                NEWPORT NEWS, Va. – Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Carlos Del Toro and Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Mike Gilday traveled to Newport News, Va. today to meet with Sailors assigned to the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73).             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BAO ZHONG WANG,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-10026

D.C. No. 1:14-cr-00007-RVM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands

Alex R. Munson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2016** 

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Bao Zhong Wang appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for distribution of

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Wang’s counsel has filed a brief stating

FILED

JAN 25 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. Wang filed two pro se letters, which we treat as Wang’s pro se

supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed. 

Wang waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988.

To the extent that Wang seeks to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of

counsel, we decline to address this issue on direct appeal. See United States v.

Rahman, 642 F.3d 1257, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 2011). 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 

2 15-10026
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0198 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0198

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing (COM(2004)0448 - C6-0143/2004 - 2004/0137(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 117 E , 18/05/2006 P. 0140 - 0166 *

P6_TA(2005)0198

Money laundering ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing (COM(2004)0448 — C6-0143/2004 — 2004/0137(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0448) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2), Article 47(2), first and third sentences, and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0143/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Petitions (A6-0137/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

ARMANDO GUZMAN 

NOTICE OP THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OP AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 5556 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC Co. LLC 

f/k/a WFP Tower A Co. L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC G.P. Corp. E/k/a WFP 

Tower A Co. GP Corp., WFP Tower B Co L.P. and WFP Tower B Co. GP Corp. 

(collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set 

forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master 

Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' 

Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the 

matter of In r~ World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 

102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned acti~n as against each ofthem, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 30 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October 18 2007 

Faust, Goetz, ScS~er & Blee, LLP 

y: William J. SmithCCWL~9137) 

for the Brookfield Parties 

r Street, 20th Floor 

New'?Cork, NY 10006 

(212) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 30 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 18 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 18 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1768 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 

Received 

DECEMBER 18, 2019 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize subtitle G of title VII of the Energy Policy 

Act of 2005, relating to diesel emissions reduction, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1768 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Diesel Emissions Re3 duction Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 797(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

6 U.S.C. 16137(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2016’’ and in7 serting ‘‘2024’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS