alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009086EN.01000301.xml

| 15.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/3

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 30 November 2007 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/38.628 — Nitrile Butadiene Rubber

2009/C 86/03

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment of the facts as an agreement and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment of the facts as an agreement and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment of the product and the geographic area affected by the cartel. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment of the product and the geographic area affected by the cartel.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment that the cartel constitutes a single and continuous infringement. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment that the cartel constitutes a single and continuous infringement.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regards the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regards the addressees of the draft decision.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's reasoning on the basic amount of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's reasoning on the basic amount of the fines.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment of the mitigating and aggravating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment of the mitigating and aggravating circumstances.

| 8. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the 2002 Commission notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines. |
| --- | --- |

8.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the 2002 Commission notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines.

| 9. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

9.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50959

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLAY OWEN BERGMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-97-CR-281-ALL-EP

- - - - - - - - - -

August 25, 1999

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clay Owen Bergman appeals from his conviction and resultant

sentence for the manufacture of marijuana. He argues that the

evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for

manufacturing in excess of 100 marijuana plants, that the

district court erred in the amount of drugs it attributed to him

for sentencing purposes, and that the court’s Allen charge was

deficient. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
No. 98-50959

-2-

error. Drug quantities are not an element of a § 841(a) offense;

drug quantities are relevant only at sentencing. See United

States v. Watch, 7 F.3d 422, 426-27 (5th Cir. 1993). The

evidence was sufficient to support Bergman’s conviction for

manufacturing marijuana. See United States v. Martinez, 975 F.2d

159, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1992). Further, the district court’s

determination that Bergman should be held responsible for 510

marijuana plants was not clearly erroneous. See United States v.

Maseratti, 1 F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1993). Finally, the court’s

Allen charge was not deficient. See United States v. Winters,

105 F.3d 200, 203-04 (5th Cir. (1997). Accordingly, the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2009013EN.01000701.xml

| 20.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/7

---

Final Report (1) of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/M.4942 — Nokia/Navteq

1

(2009/C 13/05)

On 19 February 2008, the Commission received a formal notification pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Nokia Corporation (‘Nokia’), would acquire control of the whole of Navteq Corporation by way of purchase of shares, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

Upon examination of the notification, the Commission concluded that the notified operation raised serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘EEA Agreement’). Therefore, on 28 March 2008, the Commission initiated proceedings pursuant to Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation.

On 21 April 2008 and 2 May 2008, the Commission provided Nokia with access to key documents, including non-confidential versions of third-party submissions, in accordance with paragraph 45 of DG Competition's Best Practices on the conduct of EC merger control proceedings.

On the basis of the additional evidence gathered during the in-depth phase of the investigation, the Commission services concluded that the proposed transaction would not significantly impede effective competition in the common market, and is therefore compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement. Accordingly, no Statement of Objections was sent to the notifying party.

No queries or submissions have been made to me by the merging parties or any third-party. The case does not call for any particular comments as regards the right to be heard.

Brussels, 25 June 2008.

Karen WILLIAMS

---

(1)  Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21).

1

---
# C_2009108EN.01000101.xml

| 12.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/1

---

Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of projects in the field of energy and broadband Internet as well as the CAP Health Check in the framework of the European Economic Recovery Plan

2009/C 108/01

The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission have agreed on the financing, in the framework of the European Economic Recovery Plan for modernisation of infrastructures and energy solidarity, of projects in the field of energy and broadband Internet, as well as the CAP Health Check. The projects eligible for Community support are identified in the legislative acts concerned.

The package, which aims at providing additional stimulus to the economy and improving energy security, amounts to EUR 5 000 million in current prices:

| — | EUR 3 980 million will be made available for the financing of energy projects under heading 1a of the financial framework: EUR 2 000 million in 2009 and EUR 1 980 million in 2010, |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 3 980 million will be made available for the financing of energy projects under heading 1a of the financial framework: EUR 2 000 million in 2009 and EUR 1 980 million in 2010,

| — | In addition, EUR 1 020 million will be made available within heading 2 for developing broadband Internet in rural areas and strengthening operations related to the ‘new challenges’ defined in the context of the Health Check. |
| --- | --- |

—

In addition, EUR 1 020 million will be made available within heading 2 for developing broadband Internet in rural areas and strengthening operations related to the ‘new challenges’ defined in the context of the Health Check.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 26
Clear All

        23 December 2020    

                    Naval Aviation and Aircraft Carrier Medical Staffs to Receive First Dosage of the COVID-19 Vaccination                 
                Medical personnel from a variety of Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic (CNAL) commands will receive the first coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (NMCP) Immunization Clinic, in Portsmouth, and at Navy Branch Health Clinic, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida            

        08 April 2020    

                    COVID-19 Message for Individual Augmentee (IA) Sailors                 
                As we face the impact of COVID-19 on our global missions and our lives, know that you are on our radar; regardless of which phase you are in on your mobilization.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 01-ACE-1]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Monroe City, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Monroe City, MO.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, May 17, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on February 28, 
2001 (66 FR 12731). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on May 17, 2001. No adverse comments 
were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final 
rule will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on April 20, 2001.
Herman J. Lyons, Jr.,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 01-11721 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 15 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-7106 September Term, 2022

1:22-cv-01347-UNA

Filed On: October 11, 2022

Kent Allen, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

William Wang, CEO and Kent Allen,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Millett and Rao, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for

the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 21, 2022, be

affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint

without prejudice for failure to comply with the pleading standard of Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 8(a), which requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2); see Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,

668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of

any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P.

41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy

Deputy Clerk
#                                                                         WEST 2024: Naval Special Warfare a Force Multiplier for Fleet, Prioritizing Reintegration with Joint Force                                                                    

##### by By MC1 Felicito Rustique, Naval Special Warfare Command Public Affairs

14 February 2024

                Rear Admiral Davids at WEST 2024            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: MC2 Kyle Fiori

VIRIN: 240213-N-CR158-1013

Tags:
**WEST 2024**RADM Davids**WARCOM**NSW**Naval Special Warfare
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Zillow v. Bosel, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-260.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of De cisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2017-O HIO -260

Z ILLOW v. B OSEL , R ECORDER . [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Zillow v. Bosel, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-260.] Cause dismissed as moot. (No. 2015-1608—Submitted January 10, 2017—Decided January 25, 2017.) I N M ANDAMUS

.

__________________ {¶ 1} Upon consideration of the parties’ evidence and briefs, this cause is dismissed as moot. O’C ONNOR , C.J., and O’D ONNELL , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , O’N EILL , F ISCHER , and D E W INE , JJ., concur.

_________________ Graydon, Head & Ritchey, L.L.P., and John C. Greiner, for relator. Robert L. Herron, Columbiana County Prosecuting Attorney, and Krista R. Peddicord, Assistant Pr osecuting Attorney, for respondent.

_________________
Case 1:07-cv-01526-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-01526-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE & TIME:

Tuesday, May 15, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee

* * * * *

# DATE & TIME:

Thursday, May 17, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, N.W., Washington, DC. (Ninth Floor)

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

 

Correction and Approval of Minutes

Final Audit Report on the California State Republican Party

Administration Matters

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-11878  Filed 5-8-01; 11:01 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.**

In conjunction with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Bancorp of New England, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph H. Rossi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|   | /s/ Joseph H. Rossi               |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|        |                                   |
|   | Joseph H. Rossi                   |
|   | President/Chief Executive Officer |
|   | November 13, 2003                 |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amendment to Quarterly Report of Summit
Brokerage Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Steven C. Jacobs, as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ Steven C. Jacobs
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Steven C. Jacobs
                                         Executive Vice President and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
                                         February 6, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Summit Brokerage Services, Inc. and will be retained by Summit
Brokerage Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I,Charles N. Martin, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”),as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                       of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                      Charles N. Martin, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2006