Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 92 / Friday, May 11, 2001 / Notices 24135

allocation criteria to that pro-rata share. The proposed allocations for utility and

nonutility allottees are listed here.

Utility and nonutility allottees

Proposed post-2004 power allocation

Summer

kilowatthours

Winter

kilowatthours

Summer

kilowatts

Winter

kilowatts

City of Chapman, KS ............................................................... 257,680 169,378 160 116

City of Elwood, KS ................................................................... 169,562 145,528 105 100

City of Eudora, KS ................................................................... 998,125 691,651 619 474

City of Fountain, CO ................................................................ 3,785,880 2,872,807 2,349 1,969

City of Garden City, KS ........................................................... 3,785,880 2,872,807 2,349 1,969

City of Goodland, KS ............................................................... 1,588,254 1,230,315 985 843

City of Horton, KS .................................................................... 441,108 317,470 273 218

City of Hugoton, KS ................................................................. 753,878 637,494 468 437

City of Johnson City, KS ......................................................... 446,670 340,573 277 233

City of Meade, KS ................................................................... 504,527 316,964 313 217

City of Minneapolis, KS ........................................................... 544,660 343,822 338 236

City of Troy, KS ....................................................................... 195,112 152,529 121 105

Doniphan Electric Cooperative Association, Inc., KS ............. 467,191 389,080 290 267

Fort Carson, CO ...................................................................... 3,188,774 2,678,064 1,978 1,836

Kaw Valley Electric, KS ........................................................... 3,334,693 2,486,473 2,069 1,704

Midwest Energy, Inc., KS ........................................................ 3,785,880 2,872,807 2,349 1,969

Nemaha-Marshall Electric Cooperative Association, Inc., KS 1,145,788 984,083 711 674

Regional Transportation District, Denver, CO ......................... 331,820 291,245 206 200

Sunflower Electric Power Corporation, KS .............................. 3,785,880 2,872,807 2,349 1,969

Yellowstone National Park, WY ............................................... 224,113 146,018 139 100

The proposed allocations shown in

the tables above are based on the LAP

marketable resource available at this

time. If the LAP marketable resource is

adjusted in the future, all allocations

will be adjusted accordingly.

III. Review Under the Regulatory

Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5

U.S.C. 601–621 (Act), requires Federal

agencies to perform a regulatory

flexibility analysis if a proposed

regulation is likely to have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. Western has

determined that (1) this rulemaking

relates to services offered by Western,

and, therefore, is not a rule within the

purview of the Act, and (2) the impacts

of an allocation from Western would not

cause an adverse economic impact on a

substantial number of such entities. The

requirements of this Act can be waived

if the head of the agency certifies that

the rule will not, if promulgated, have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities. By

the execution of this Federal Register

notice, Western’s Administrator certifies

that no significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities

will occur.

IV. Review Under the Paperwork

Reduction Act

In accordance with the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501–

3520, Western has received approval

from the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) to collect customer

information in this rule, under control

number 1910–1200.

V. Review Under the National

Environmental Policy Act

Western has completed an

environmental impact statement on the

Program, pursuant to the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969

(NEPA). The Record of Decision was

published in the Federal Register on

October 12, 1995 (60 FR 53181).

Western’s NEPA review assured all

environmental effects related to these

procedures have been analyzed.

VI. Determination Under Executive

Order 12866

DOE has determined that this is not

a significant regulatory action because it

does not meet the criteria of Executive

Order 12866, 58 FR 51735. Western has

an exemption from centralized

regulatory review under Executive

Order 12866; accordingly, no clearance

of this notice by OMB is required.

Dated: April 30, 2001.

Michael S. Hacskaylo,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 01–11927 Filed 5–10–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6617–8]

Environmental Impacts Statements;

Notice of Availability

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal

Activities, General Information (202)

564–7167 or www.epa.gov/oeca/of.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact

Statements

Filed April 30, 2001 Through May 04,

2001

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 010151, Draft EIS, AFS, IL,

Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie,

Proposed Land and Resource

Management Plan, Implementation,

Prairie Plan Development, Will

County, IL, Comment Period Ends:

September 06, 2001, Contact: Renee

Thakali (815) 423–6370.

EIS No. 010152, Final EIS, USA,

Programmatic EIS—Transportable

Treatment Systems for Non-Stockpile

Chemical Warfare Material (CWM), To

Destroy Non-Stockpile in order to

Protect Human, Health, Safety and the

Environment, To Comply with the

International Treaty, Nationwide,

Wait Period Ends: June 11, 2001,

Contact: John Gieseking (410) 436–

8737.

EIS No. 010153, Draft Supplement,

BLM, MT, Zortman and Landusky

Mines Reclamation Plan,

Modifications and Mine Life

Extensions, Updated Information To

Analyze Additional Reclamation

Alternatives, Approval of Mine

24136 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 92 / Friday, May 11, 2001 / Notices

Operation, Mine Reclamation and

COE Section 404 Permits, Little Rocky

Mountains, Phillip County, MT,

Comment Period Ends: July 09, 2001,

Contact: Scott Haight (406)538–1930.

EIS No. 010154, Draft EIS, DOI, NV,

Reno Clay Plant Project, Construct

and Operate an Open-Pit Clay Mine

and Ore Processing Facility, Plan of

Operations, Oil-Dri Corporation of

Nevada, Hungry Valley, Washoe

County, NV, Comment Period Ends:

July 10, 2001, Contact: Terri Knutson

(775) 885–6156.

EIS No. 010155, Draft EIS, COE, NJ,

Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends

Inlet, Storm Damage Reduction for

Ocean City and Ludlam Island

Utilizing Beachfill to Construct a

Protective Berm and Dune, City of

Ocean City, Strathmere (Township of

Upper), City of Sea Isle City, Cape

May County, NJ, Comment Period

Ends: June 25, 2001, Contact: Steven

Allen (215) 656–6559.

EIS No. 010156, Final EIS, JUS, AZ,

Pinal County Private Detention

Facility, Development and Operation

of a Pre-Trail Detention Facility, Pinal

County, AZ, Wait Period Ends: June

11, 2001, Contact: Charles Coburn

(202) 307–9045.

EIS No. 010157, Draft EIS, BOP, CA,

Fresno Federal Correctional Facility

Development, Orange Cove, Fresno

County, CA, Comment Period Ends:

June 25, 2001, Contact: David J.

Dorworth (202) 514–6470.

EIS No. 010158, Draft EIS, FHW, PA,

Pennsylvania Turnpike/Interstate 95

Interchange Project, Pennsylvania

Turnpike (I–276) and I–95 in Bucks

County, PA Connection with

Proposed Interstate Improvements

Extending east into Burlington

County, NJ, Funding, Buck County,

PA and Burlington County, NJ,

Comment Period Ends: July 02, 2001,

Contact: James A. Cheatham (717)

221–3461.

EIS No. 010159, Draft Supplement,

DOE, NV, Geologic Repository for the

Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and

High-Level Radioactive Waste,

Construction, Operation, Monitoring

and Eventually Closing a Geologic

Repository at Yuma Mountain,

Update and Additional Information,

Nye County, NV, Comment Period

Ends: June 25, 2001, Contact: Jane R.

Summerson (702) 794–1493.

EIS No. 010160, Final EIS, FHW, CO,

South I–25 and US 85 Corridors

Improvements, CO–470 to Castle

Rock, Funding, Douglas County, CO,

Wait Period Ends: June 11, 2001,

Contact: Scott Sands (303) 969–6730.

EIS No. 010161, Draft EIS, USA, CO,

Pueblo Chemical Depot, Destruction

of Chemical Munitions, Design,

Construction, Operation and Closure

of a Facility, Pueblo County, CO,

Comment Period Ends: June 25, 2001,

Contact: Penny Robitaille (410) 436–

4178.

EIS No. 010162, Draft EIS, DOD, AL,

Assembled Chemical Weapons

Destruction Technologies at One or

More Sites, Design, Construction and

Operation of One or More Pilot Test

Facilities, Anniston Army Depot, AL;

Pine Bluff Arsenal, AR; Blue Grass

Army Depot, KY and Pueblo Chemical

Depot, CO, Comment Period Ends:

June 25, 2001, Contact: Jon Ware (410)

436–2210.

EIS No. 010163, Final EIS, AFS, WY,

State of Wyoming School Section 16

T. 12N., R.83W., 6th P.M., Issuing a

Forest Road Special-Use-Permit for

Access, Medicine Bow-Routt National

Forests, Brush Creek/Hayden Ranger

District, Carbon County, WY, Wait

Period Ends: June 11, 2001, Contact:

Lynn Johnson 307–745–2300

Dated: May 8, 2001.

Joseph C. Montgomery,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 01–11954 Filed 5–10–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6617–9]

Environmental Impacts Statements

and Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared pursuant to the Environmental

ReviewProcess (ERP), under section 309

of the Clean Air Act and Section

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental

Policy Act as amended. Requests for

copies of EPA comments can be directed

to the Office of Federal Activities at

(202) 564–7167.

An explanation of the ratings assigned

to draft environmental impact

statements(EISs) was published in FR

datedApril 14, 2000 (65 FR 20157) .

Draft EISs

ERP No. DA–FAA–F51040–IN Rating

EC2 , IndianapolisInternational Airport

Master Plan Development,

UpdatedInformation to Construct a

Midfield Terminal, Midfield

Interchange, and Associated

Developments, Airport Layout Plan

Approval,Funding and Section 404

Permit, Marion County, IN

Summary: EPA continues to express

concerns relating to the mitigation being

provided for compensatory forested

wetlands.

ERP No. DS–FTA–K40130–CA Rating

LO , Los Angeles Eastside Corridor

Transportation Improvement,Updated

Information for Light Rail Transit (LRT)

BuildAlternative and the Three

Transition Options, Extending from

Union Station to Beverly and Atlantic

Boulevards in EastLos Angeles, via

Alameda St., 1st. Street, Indiana St., 3rd

Street, and Beverly Boulevard, Los

Angeles County, CA

Summary: EPA found that the

document adequately discussed the

environmental impacts of the proposed

project.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–FHW–G40151–TX, US–

190 Corridor from FM2657 to the East

City Limits of Copperas

Cove,Transportation Improvements,

Major Investment Study,Coryell and

Lampasas Counties, TX

Summary: EPA has completed its

review of the Final EIS and has no

objection to the selection of the

preferred alternative.

ERP No. F–NOA–A91066–00, Tilefish

FisheryManagement Plan (FMP),

(Lopholatilus Chamaeleonticep),To

Prevent Overfishing and to Rebuild the

Resource of Tilefish,Located along the

Atlantic Ocean

Summary: EPA had environmental

concerns about the proposed regulations

and the sufficiency of the information in

the document. EPA’s concerns included

the adequacy of the mitigation measures

and the impacts of trawling on Tilefish

EFH.

ERP No. F–NOA–K91008–00, Pelagic

Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region,

Fishery Management Plan,To Analyze

Longline Fisheries, Commercial Troll

and Recreational Troll Fisheries,

Commercial PelagicHandliner and

Commercial Pole and Line Skipjack

Fishery,Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam

and Commonwealth of the Northern

Mariana Island

Summary: EPA reviewed the FEIS and

found that the document adequately

addresses the issues raised in our

comment letter on the DEIS.

ERP No. F–FHW–H40168–MO, New

MississippiRiver Crossing, Relocated I–

70 and I–64 Connector, Funding,COE

Section 404 and 10 Permits, NPDES

Permit, St. Louis County, MO

Summary: EPA has no objections to

this project as proposed.

Dated: May 8, 2001.

Joseph C. Montgomery,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 01–11955 Filed 5–10–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U