alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Live Ventures Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2019,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virland A. Johnson, the
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, to the best of my knowledge and belief, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



| | /s/ Virland A. Johnson
        Virland A. Johnson
        Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 14, 2019



The certification set forth above is being
furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the
Report as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 27 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April                11, 2008 |                                     | /s/                 ROBERT T. FABER |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                     | Robert                T. Faber           |
|                                     | *Chief                Financial Officer* |

----
Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 33 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 33 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 33 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Order entered November 23, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00661-CR

No. 05-21-00664-CR

EDWIN CORTEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-86485-2020

and 

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-82900-2020

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s (1) “Motion to Cross-file and/or 

Supplement Records on Appeal in Connected/Companion Cases,” (2) motion to 

extend time to file a brief in 05-21-00661-CR, and (3) motion to file an amended 

brief in 05-21-00664-CR.
Because these are companion cases, appellant may refer to or rely on the 

records in either appeal when briefing his issues. Therefore, we DENY appellant’s 

motion to cross-file and/or supplement the records.

We GRANT the motion to extend time to file the brief and the motion to file 

an amended brief. We ORDER appellant’s brief in 05-21-00661-CR and 

appellant’s amended brief in 05-21-00664-CR filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
(August 7, 1987)

#### Capasso v Capasso.

On motions of the parties, the judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 18, 1985, and the findings in support thereof, are modified as indicated in the order of this court, and to the extent not modified, they are affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.
#### Cleo Kamp, Appellant, v Arbern Realty Co., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about January 13, 1988, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of a fall which allegedly occurred on premises owned by the defendant Arbern and leased in their entirety to plaintiffs employer, the operator of a nursing home. Under the lease agreement, the obligation to maintain the premises and make all necessary repairs thereon rested upon the tenant-employer. However, the lease also gave the defendant landlord the right to enter and inspect the property and make any necessary repairs.

Contrary to the holding of the IAS court, the landlord’s right to reenter would be sufficient to hold it liable for defects on the premises of which it had actual or constructive notice. *(Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co.,*69 NY2d 559.) We affirm the dismissal of the complaint, however, because neither the pleadings nor the answering papers submitted on the motion for summary judgment provides the slightest indication as to the nature of the claimed defect, its duration or even where on the premises the accident occurred. In light of defendant’s denial of knowledge of any condition on the premises that caused plaintiff to fall, it was incumbent on the plaintiff to submit evidentiary facts or materials to raise a triable issue in that regard. *(Indig v Finkelstein,*23 NY2d 728.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                350
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       5,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                          100
<INVENTORY>                                         3,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   10,316
<PP&E>                                              3,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                      3,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     11,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               5,967
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              645
<OTHER-SE>                                          2,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       11,870
<SALES>                                            24,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   24,410
<CGS>                                              14,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      14,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    8,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      (37)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       110
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (270)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   380
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          380
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .29



</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PAMELA MELVIN,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________

2023-2203

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 20-1556, Chief Judge Margaret C. 

Bartley, Judge Michael P. Allen, and Judge Scott Laurer.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

After the court granted Pamela Melvin 268 days of extensions for filing her opening brief, the court ordered Ms. 

Melvin to file her brief by August 5, 2024 or the appeal 

would be dismissed. She has not filed the brief; instead, 

she moves for a refund of the docketing fee and sanctions 

Case: 23-2203 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 08/26/2024
2 MELVIN v. MCDONOUGH

against the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. ECF No. 28 at 

46; see also id. at 4 (arguing for “monetary sanction”).

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) ECF No. 28 is denied. Any request for a refund of 

the docketing fee should be made to the United States 

Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

(2) The appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

(3) Any other pending motion is denied as moot.

August 26, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

Case: 23-2203 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 08/26/2024
Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### Phillip CLINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.J. HARMON, Acting Warden; Mike Snow, Unit Manager; Mr. Thompson; Dr. Dominick McLain, D.O.; Federal Bureau of Prisons, All in their official and individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-6011.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 28, 2013.

Phillip Cline, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Cline appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cline’s complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Cline v. Harmon,*No. 5:11-cv-00870, 2012 WL 6599790 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

KLEVER VASQUEZ 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKEIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

90 CHURCH STREET LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 

ET AL., CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 4520 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower B Co. L.P., WFP Tower B Co. 

GP Corp., WFP Tower D Co. L.P. and WFP Tower D Co. GP Corp. (collectively the 

"Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in 

the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' Amended Answer to 

Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the matter of~n re World 

Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each ofthem, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 28 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October 12'L 2007 

Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee, LLP 

ByJWilli~m J. Smith ~Wr~i~9L37) 

AteQmeys~for the Brookfield Parties 

Tw~Recfbr Street, 20'" Floor 

New Y~di;k. NY 10006 

(212)363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH Document 28 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 21 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 21 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
#                                                                         U.S. Fleet Forces Command, Navy Installations Command Conduct Hurricane Response Exercise                                                                     

##### by  U.S. Fleet Forces Command Public Affairs and Commander, Naval Installations Command Public Affairs

19 April 2022WASHINGTON -- **“Ensuring the safety and readiness of our Sailors, their families and our fleet units is always a priority, and preparation is the key,” said Adm. Daryl Caudle, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command. “Just like preparing for deployment and warfighting missions, we must be equally prepared to respond to a natural disaster. This exercise ensures we are ready for the upcoming hurricane season.”**CNIC_HQ_PAO@navy.mil

Tags:
**Hurricane Exercise**Citadel Gale**CNIC**Fleet Forces**ATLANTIC COAST**Sortie**HURREX
EXHIBIT 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I,Phillip W. Roe, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(the “Exchange Act”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                       of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Phillip W. Roe                                  Phillip W. RoeExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Chief Accounting Officer and TreasurerNovember 12, 2008
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ WILLIAM KEIPERDated: August 9, 2005
    
    William KeiperInterim Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ G. GRANT LYONDated: August 9, 2005
    
    G. Grant LyonInterim Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                        CONSENT OF SMITH & GESTELAND

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Baylake Corp. of our report dated January 24, 1997 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Baylake and its subsidiaries as of December 31,
1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholder equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31,
1996, 1995, and 1994, which report appears in Baylake's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.


Madison, Wisconsin                          SMITH & GESTELAND, LLP
March 25, 1997
509 A.2d 373

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Joseph Martin ROEDER, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Feb. 10, 1986.

Filed May 16, 1986.

*138Janice L. Hambridge, Assistant Public Defender, Williamsport, for appellant.

Brett O. Feese, District Attorney, Williamsport, for Com., appellee.

Before CAVANAUGH, WATKINS and LIPEZ, JJ.

WATKINS, Judge:

This case comes to us on appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming county and involves defendant-appellant’s appeal from a non-jury conviction on a charge of driving under the influence.

The defendant had applied to the District Attorney for acceptance into the Accelerated Rehabilitation Disposition program. This application was denied by the District Attorney. The defendant had a prior felony record involving drug delivery charges in 1971. Defendant argues that the District Attorney abused his discretion in refusing to admit him to the A.R.D. program. We disagree. The district attorney is provided discretion in administering the A.R.D. program. See *Pa.Rule of Crim.Pro. 175, 176.*We cannot conclude that his policy of refusing to permit offenders with a prior felony record into the program is an abuse of *139discretion. This is so even though the felony conviction occurred thirteen years prior to the indicent giving rise to the driving while under the influence charge.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott MacCaughern, the Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Scott MacCaughernPrincipal Accounting Officer Date: January 16, 2007
**Welcome**The U.S. Fleet Forces Command Director of Civilian Human Resources (DCHR) serves as the day-to-day technical authority for human resources advice and technical human resources determinations affecting the command, to include its human resource offices (HROs) and satellites. DCHR basics and services include: 
                        -  Serving as the principal HR advisor and technical authority within the command on civilian HR issues 
                        -  Advising the chain of command and the deputy assistant secretary of the Navy for Civilian Human Resources (DASN (CHR)) on decisions and issues impacting current and future command civilian workforce 
                        -  Providing technical direction to command HROs and their satellite offices, and provides or advocates for sufficient resources and capabilities for those offices 
                        -  Leading support and report on command and activity human capital and strategic workforce planning processes 
                        -  Developing and administering command-wide guidance for HR programs, processes and operations, and assessing implementation of HR policies and programs 
                        -  Developing and maintaining HR performance metrics 
                        -  Participating in and supporting DoN-wide efforts to improve and enhance recruitment and retention programs 
                        -  Advocating command requirements and representing the command in DoN HR policy, program development and field operations issues 
                        -  Collaborating with the servicing operations center director to provide end-to-end HR services for the command 
                        -  Collaborating with staff on DoN HR issues, legislative initiatives, DoD regulatory changes, and DoN-wide HR policy improvements 
                        -  Monitoring command development and use of HR information technology (IT) systems and applications to ensure compliance with DoN IT policy, and HR functional application management (FAM) requirements 

 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF Document 7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05795-KMK-MDF Document 7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        12 April 2021    

                    Navy Expeditionary Forces Secure the Operating Environment  Across the Competition Continuum                 
                Hidden under the cover of darkness or operating in plain sight, your Navy Expeditionary Intelligence Command (NEIC) Intelligence Exploitation Teams (IETs) and Expeditionary Exploitation Unit 1 (EXU-1) Sailors operate at the tactical edge of expeditionary missions. From their forward position, these            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website