alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - 21st Century Sailor and Marine 
                            - Aircraft 
                            - Awards and Recognition 
                            - Biographies 
                            - Biographies 
                            - Chief of Naval Operations 
                            - Christening 
                            - Commissioning 
                            - Community Outreach 
                            - Current Readiness 
                            - Diversity 
                            - Energy Savings Initiative 
                            - Environmental Initiative 
                            - Environmental Stewardship 
                            - Family Readiness 
                            - Fleet of the Future 
                            - Future Readiness 
                            - Global Operations 
                            - Health and Fitness 
                            - Home Slideshow 
                            - Humanitarian Operations 
                            - Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy 
                            - Morale, Welfare and Recreation 
                            - Navy Casualty  
                            - Navy History and Heritage 
                            - Navy Medicine 
                            - Navy Reserve 
                            - Operation Enduring Freedom 
                            - Other 
                            - Pay and Benefits 
                            - Piracy 
                            - Ready, Relevant Learning 
                            - Research 
                            - Safety 
                            - SAPR 
                            - Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics 
                            - Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 
                            - Ships 
                            - STEM 
                            - Training and Education 
                            - Uniform Matters 
                            - Wounded Warrior 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

230918-N-N0831-0005.JPGPhoto By: Petty Officer 2nd Class Nicholas Huynh

CNSP LATEST NEWS - USS Marinette (LCS 25) Commissions the Wright WayDOWNLOAD PHOTO(0.13 MB)                This photograph is considered public domain and has been cleared for release. If you would like to republish please give the photographer appropriate credit. Further, any commercial or non-commercial use of this photograph or any                other DoD image must be made in compliance with guidance found at            http://www.dimoc.mil/resources/limitations.html                , which pertains to                intellectual property restrictions (e.g., copyright and trademark, including                the use of official emblems, insignia, names and slogans), warnings                regarding use of images of identifiable personnel, appearance of                endorsement, and related matters.            Back to Gallery
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0281 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0281

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund (COM(2004)0493 - C6-0090/2004 - 2004/0165(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 157 E , 06/07/2006 P. 0313 - 0324 *

P6_TA(2005)0281

ESF ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund (COM(2004)0493 — C6-0090/2004 — 2004/0165(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0493) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 148 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0090/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (A6-0216/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 26 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

ENRIQUE MENDOZA (and wife MARIA DE MENDOZA), 07-CV-5302 (AKH)

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY

100 CHURCH LLC OF

-against- AMENDED ANSWER TO

MASTER COMPLAINT

100 CHURCH LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant 100 CHURCH LLC (hereinafter 100

Church), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption

(Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action,

herein adopt 100 Churchs Amended Answer to Master Complaint dated August 30, 2007, which

was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation,

21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, 100 Church demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action

as against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: New York, New York

September 7, 2007

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

100 CHURCH LLC

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 687-0100

Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaint~/f

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

All Other Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the following

document to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of 100 Church LLCs Adoption of Amended Answer to Master

Complaint.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaint~ffs

Dated: September 10, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defrndants

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           369
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    816
<ALLOWANCES>                                     274
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                            15
<DEPRECIATION>                                    15
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       920
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     959
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  79
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (13.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 24 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 24 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Chesapeake Bay Activities 

#           USGS Chesapeake Bay Accomplishments for 2008      

      By Chesapeake Bay Activities

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

USGS Chesapeake Bay Accomplishments for 2008

**File icon

June 26, 2020

####   USGS Chesapeake Bay Accomplishments for 2008

### Contacts

####             Scott Phillips (Former Employee)          

##### Chesapeake Bay Program Coordinator

Northeast Region

#### Ken Hyer, Ph.D.

##### Chesapeake Bay Coordinator

Chesapeake Bay Activities

kenhyer@usgs.gov

804-382-7111
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 179 

To provide for no net increase in the total acreage of certain Federal land 

under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, the National 

Park Service, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Forest 

Service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. GRIFFITH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for no net increase in the total acreage of certain 

Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of 

Land Management, the National Park Service, the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Forest 

Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Acre In, Acre Out 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 179 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO NET INCREASE IN CERTAIN FEDERAL LANDS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—For acquisition of land by the 

3 Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture 

4 that would result in a net increase of total land acreage 

5 under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service, the 

6 United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of 

7 Land Management, or the Forest Service, the Secretary 

8 concerned shall offer for sale an equal number of acres 

9 of Federal land that is under the same jurisdictional sta10 tus. 

11 (b) EXEMPTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

12 easements acquired— 

13 (1) by the Secretary of the Interior to facilitate 

14 management of Federal lands; or 

15 (2) by the Secretary of Agriculture to facilitate 

16 management of Federal lands. 

17 (c) CONSIDERATION.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—Land sold pursuant to sub19 section (a) shall be offered for sale— 

20 (A) at fair market value (based on local 

21 comparable sales); and 

22 (B) at a price that is reduced by 10 per23 cent each month if the land is not sold or under 

24 contract to be sold by the date that is 6 months 

25 after the land was first offered for sale. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 179 IH

1 (2) EXCEPTION.—Time periods during which 

2 land is under contract for sale or withdrawn from 

3 the market shall not be counted for the purposes of 

4 price reduction under paragraph (1)(B). 

5 (d) EXISTING RIGHTS.—The sale of Federal lands 

6 pursuant to this section shall be subject to valid existing 

7 rights. 

8 (e) PROCEEDS OF SALE OF LANDS.—All net proceeds 

9 from the sale of Federal lands pursuant to this section 

10 shall be deposited directly into the Treasury for reduction 

11 of the public debt. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 14 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE) 

#           Web Tools        

-  Home 
-  LANDSAT CALVAL 
-  JACIE 
-  Satellite Compendium 
-  Data Quality Assessment 
-  Requirements & Capabilities 
-  Lidar 
-  Uncrewed Aerial 
-  Test Site Catalog 
-  EROS Instrumentation 
-  Community Engagement 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

The following online tools are useful in learning more about the work of ECCOE.

March 21, 2024

####                 Earth Observing Satellites Online Compendium              

The Earth Observing Satellites Online Compendium contains details about past, present and future Earth observing satellites and the sensors they carry. This information compiled by staff at the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

National Land Imaging Program, EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE), Requirements Capabilities & Analysis for Earth Observations

March 16, 2023

####                 Land Product Characterization System              

The Land Product Characterization System (LPCS) has the capability to trend system characterizations for various sensors, providing users the ability to do comparative analysis of satellite data and products. This resource has been developed and is managed by the USGS Requirements, Capabilities and Analysis for Earth Observation (RCA-EO) team.

National Land Imaging Program, Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center , EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE), Requirements Capabilities & Analysis for Earth Observations

January 28, 2022

####                 JACIE Search Tool              

Annual Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (JACIE) workshops engage federal agencies, their partners, and the commercial remote sensing industry to understand the characteristics and capabilities of current and new data sources, along with the quality of data they provide. This Tool allows the searching of presentations from the workshops, that started in 2001. 

 

EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE)

July 28, 2021

####                 Test Sites Catalog              

The Test Site Catalog contains information about worldwide radiometric, geometric, and spatial calibration sites used for post launch characterization and calibration of Earth observation sensors.

 

EROS CalVal Center of Excellence (ECCOE)
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(i)


                           LINE OF CREDIT DEMAND NOTE


$2,000,000                                             September 26, 1995


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, NUCLEAR METALS, INC., a
Massachusetts corporation and CAROLINA METALS, INC., a Delaware corporation
(the "Borrowers"), hereby jointly and severally promise to pay to the order
of STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, an FDIC insured Massachusetts
chartered trust company ("Bank"), in lawful money of the United States of
America in immediately available funds at its office at 225 Franklin Street,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110, on demand, the principal sum of TWO MILLION
DOLLARS ($2,000,000) or such lesser sum as may from time to time be
outstanding under the terms of that certain letter agreement between the
Borrowers and Bank of even date herewith, as amended, modified, supplemented
and/or restated from time to time (the "Letter Agreement").  Without limiting
the demand nature hereof, this Note is subject to the mandatory repayment
provisions set forth in the Letter Agreement.

     The Borrowers promise to pay interest on the unpaid principal balance
hereof at the rates and at the times provided in the Letter Agreement.

     This Note shall be governed and construed under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and shall be deemed to be under seal.

                                   NUCLEAR METALS, INC.

WITNESS:
                                   By:  /S/ JAMES M. SPIEZIO
                                        -------------------------------
   /s/ Frank S. Hamblett                Name:   James M. Spiezio
   -----------------------              Title:  V. P. Finance



                                   CAROLINA METALS, INC.

WITNESS:
                                   By:  /S/ JAMES M. SPIEZIO
                                        -------------------------------
   /s/ Frank S. Hamblett                Name:   James M. Spiezio
   -----------------------              Title:  President
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 MAY 27, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-13896

 

D. C. Docket No. 05-00153 CR-C-S

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRENDA McCALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

 

(May 27, 2008)

Before DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER,* District

Judge.

____________________

*Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of

Florida, sitting by designation.
2

PER CURIAM:

A federal indictment charged Appellant, Brenda McCall (“McCall”), with

three crimes: two counts of aiding and abetting the distribution of

pseudoephedrine with knowledge that it would be used to manufacture

methamphetamine – one for an April 10, 2003 sale, and another for an April 17,

2003 sale – and one count of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. A

jury found McCall not guilty on the conspiracy charge and the April 10 charge,

but found her guilty of the April 17, 2003 sale.

The issues presented on appeal are:

(1) Whether the Government presented sufficient evidence for a reasonable

jury to conclude that McCall knew the pseudoephedrine she sold on April 17

would be used to manufacture methamphetamine;

(2) Whether the district court erred in charging the jury with a “deliberate

ignorance” instruction; and

(3) Whether the district court abused its discretion in admitting the

testimony of Investigator Tony Helms.

“We review a district court’s decision to deny a motion for judgment of

acquittal based on sufficiency of the evidence de novo.” United States v. Dulcio,

441 F.3d 1269, 1276 (11th Cir. 2006). In determining whether the Government
3

presented sufficient evidence, the court “must review the evidence in the light

most favorable to the [G]overnment and draw all reasonable factual inferences in

favor of the jury’s verdict.” Id. “Where an appellant has objected to a jury

instruction at trial, we review the court’s decision to use that instruction for abuse

of discretion.” United States v. Dean, 487 F.3d 840, 847 (11th Cir.2007), cert.

denied, 128 S. Ct. 1444 (2008). We review for abuse of discretion the district

court’s admission of evidence. See United States v. Maragh, 174 F.3d 1202, 1204

(11th Cir.1999).

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the

benefit of oral argument, we conclude that there is no merit to any of the

arguments McCall makes in this appeal and, accordingly, we affirm her

conviction.

AFFIRMED.