alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Jeffrey L. Garon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Tripath Technology Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238]



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: September 12, 2005



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY L. GARON                                                
|Jeffrey L. Garon Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(7 Misc Rep. 726.)

#### MAHONEY v. KENT.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

April 2, 1894.)

Principal and Agent—Liability op Agent—Undisclosed Principal.

An agent who fails to disclose his principal is personally liable to a person with whom he contracts, though such person might have discovered the agency; actual knowledge being necessary to relieve the agent of liability.

Appeal from second district court.

Action by John Mahoney against Alexander T. Kent to recover for services rendered. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BISCHOFF and GIEGERICH, JJ.

George Edward Kent, for appellant.

James J. Walsh, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

That the plaintiff was employed by the defendant, and that the services in question were rendered during the period for which compensation is claimed, are not disputed; nor is it contradicted that the disbursements which are sought to be recovered were reasonable, and were made in the course of the plaintiff’s duties. As to whether or not an agreement existed, whereby the defendant charged himself with the repayment of these disbursements, and as to the amount agreed upon as compensation for the plaintiff’s services during the week for which compensation is here claimed, there is a direct conflict of fact, upon which a finding either way might have been made; but that the determination below upon such evidence will not be reviewed upon appeal is the well-settled rule of this court.

*20It is contended, however, that this action should have been brought against the Sporting World Company, of which the defendant is president, and in which capacity it is claimed that the agreement with the plaintiff was entered into by him. There is no evidence that the plaintiff was employed under any representations as to the agency of the defendant, and the justice properly decided the motion to dismiss the complaint upon this ground. It is elementary that an agent who fails to disclose his principal is liable personally to the party with whom he contracts. Mills v. Hunt, 20 Wend. 431. Again, it is urged that the plaintiff could well have discovered the existence of the defendant’s principal from a perusal of a certain portion of the newspaper upon which he was employed. But it is not sufficient that the true principal might have been discovered by the party contracting with the agent. Actual knowledge is necessary (Cobb v. Knapp, 71 N. Y. 348, 352); and the evidence fails to show any such knowledge on the part of the plaintiff in this case. In the case last cited, the court say: “There is no hardship in the rule, of liability against agents. They always have it in their own power to relieve themselves, and, when they do not, it must be presumed that they intend to be liable.” The recovery is fully supported by the evidence, and, no error appearing from the record, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Clear All

        01 February 2012    

                    Bataan Amphibious Ready Group Returns from Deployment                 
                Nearly 2,000 Sailors aboard the ships of the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (BATARG) are scheduled to return to their homeports Tuesday, Feb. 7 following a 10 1/2-month deployment supporting operations in the U.S. Navy's 5th and 6th Fleets areas of responsibility            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Clear All

        09 January 2024    

                    SWOBOSS Highlights The Fight, The Force, The Future at 2024 Surface Navy Association National Symposium                 
                ARLINGTON, Va.— Vice Adm. Brendan McLane, commander, Naval Surface Force, emphasized warfighting effectiveness during his keynote remarks at the 36th Annual Surface Navy Association (SNA) National Symposium in Arlington, Va., Jan. 9.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                ROCK-TENN COMPANY

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF ROCK-TENN COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                           JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
---------------------------------------------  -----------------------------
<S>                                            <C>
Alliance Display, LLC                                Delaware
Alliance Services Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.         Mexico
Alliance Rock-Tenn Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.        Mexico
Dominion Paperboard Products Ltd.                    Quebec, Canada
Groupe Cartem Wilco Inc.                             Quebec, Canada
GSD Packaging, LLC                                   Delaware
Ling Industries, Inc.                                Quebec, Canada
Ling Quebec, Inc.                                    Quebec, Canada
PCPC, Inc.                                           California
Rock-Tenn Canada Holdings II, Inc.                   Georgia
Rock-Tenn Canada Holdings, Inc.                      Georgia
Rock-Tenn Company of Canada                          Nova Scotia, Canada
Rock-Tenn Company of Illinois, Inc.                  Illinois
Rock-Tenn Company of Texas                           Georgia
Rock-Tenn Company, Mill Division, LLC                Tennessee
Rock-Tenn Converting Company                         Georgia
Rock-Tenn Financial, Inc.                            Delaware
Rock-Tenn Mill Company, LLC                          Georgia
Rock-Tenn Packaging and Paperboard, LLC              Georgia
Rock-Tenn Packaging Company                          Delaware
Rock-Tenn Partition Company                          Georgia
Rock-Tenn Real Estate, LLC                           Georgia
Rock-Tenn Services Inc.                              Georgia
Rock-Tenn Shared Services, LLC                       Georgia
RTS Embalajes de Argentina                           Argentina
RTS Embalajes De Chile Limitada                      Chile
RTS Empaques, S. De R.L. CV                          Mexico
RTS Packaging, LLC                                   Delaware
RTS Packaging Foreign Holdings, LLC                  Georgia
Waldorf Corporation                                  Delaware
Wilco Inc.                                           Quebec, Canada
9124-1232 Quebec Inc.                                Quebec, Canada
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Wisconsin-Madison Notice of Decision on Application 
for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 01-007. Applicant: University of Wisconsin--Madison, 
Madison, WI 53706. Instrument: Sample Preparation Chamber with 
accessories. Manufacturer: ELMITEC Elektronenmikroskopie, Germany. 
Intended Use: See notice at 66 FR 16445, March 26, 2001.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: This is a compatible accessory for an existing 
instrument purchased for the use of the applicant. The instrument and 
accessory were made by the same manufacturer. The National Institutes 
of Health advises in its memorandum of March 12, 2001, that the 
accessory is pertinent to the intended uses and that it knows of no 
comparable domestic accessory.
    We know of no domestic accessory which can be readily adapted to 
the existing instrument.

Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 01-11312 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 32.01
                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

I, Gary D. Halbert, the President of ProFutures, Inc., as General Partner of
ProFutures Long/Short Growth Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of ProFutures Long/Short Growth Fund, L.P.
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ProFutures
Long/Short Growth Fund, L.P.

                           PROFUTURES LONG/SHORT GROWTH FUND, L.P.
                           By:  ProFutures, Inc., General Partner

                           By:      /s/ GARY D. HALBERT
                                    ----------------------------
                                    Gary D. Halbert
                                    President
                                    August 12, 2005
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

SIXTA T GARCIA 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OF AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 05292 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Properties OLP Co. 

LLC flWa BFP One Liberty Plaza Co. LLC, Brookfield Financial Properties, Inc., 

Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower B Co L.P. and WFP Tower B Co. GP 

Corp. (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations 

set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master 

Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' 

Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the 

matter of lit re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 

102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October Is 2007 

Faust, Goetz, Sche~Jsfzy& Blee, LLP 

By~Willi~m J. Smith ~WSS~f37) 

Att~meys JFor the Brookfield Parties 

Two\pectbr Street, 20th Floor 

New Yo~k. NY 10006 

(212)363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,570
<SECURITIES>                                   889,908
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   652
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 911,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          817,010
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   967,063
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,828
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,992
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,992
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,992
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

BIO-PATH HOLDINGS, INC.


2017 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This First Amendment
(the “First Amendment”) to that certain Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
of Bio-Path Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is adopted as of October 28,
2019, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company. All capitalized and undefined terms used herein shall have
the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to subsection 18.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) is authorized to
amend the Plan, provided that any amendment that would increase the number of Shares reserved for issuance under the Plan (other
than in accordance with an adjustment pursuant to subsection 17.1 of the Plan) must be approved by the stockholders of the Company
within twelve (12) months before or after such amendment; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Board unanimously approved this First Amendment to increase the number of Shares reserved for issuance under the Plan as set forth
herein, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company, and has recommended that the stockholders of the Company approve
this First Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in connection with the foregoing, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company:


 


Subsection 4.1 is
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


1.  “4.1Share
Reserve. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 4 and subsection 17.1, the maximum number of
Shares that may be issued with respect to Awards granted pursuant to this Plan shall not exceed 660,000. All or any portion
of the Share reserve may be issued in connection with the exercise of Incentive Stock Options. The Shares issued pursuant to
this Plan may be authorized but unissued Shares or may be issued Shares that have been repurchased or acquired by the
Company, including shares purchased by the Company on the open market for purposes of the Plan.”


 


Except as amended
and modified by this First Amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect, and the Plan and this First Amendment
shall be construed as one and the same instrument.


 


The foregoing is hereby acknowledged as being the First Amendment to the Bio-Path
Holdings, Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, as adopted by the Board on October 28, 2019, subject to approval by the Company’s
stockholders.


 


	 	BIO-PATH HOLDINGS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:   	/s/ Peter H. Nielsen
	 	Name: Peter H. Nielsen
	 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 47 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 47 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.15






 Confidential Treatment Requested by Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. 

Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. Section 200.83 
  

 Exhibit 10.15 
  





 
  

			
	TO:	  	MICHAEL GRAHAM
		
	FROM:	  	STEVE ESTES
		
	DATE:	  	JULY 8, 2019
		
	SUBJECT:	  	PLANNED ISSUANCE OF RESTRICTED STOCK

  
  

As we have discussed, a critical component of our ongoing business strategy for Reynolds Consumer Products LLC will be to explore opportunities for the
business that could lead to an Initial Public Offering (IPO) of the business or potentially a divestiture of the associated business entities. Your assistance is needed by Reynolds as we work through this process to help prepare the business for a
successful transaction. 
 If the IPO is successful, the company whose shares are registered in the IPO will issue you Restricted Stock at the completion of
the IPO. The number of shares in this grant equals $399,358 divided by the IPO price as of the date of the grant, rounded to the nearest whole share. Vesting for the restricted stock will occur over a 3-year
period with 1/3 vesting after 12-months from the successful IPO; 1/3 vesting after 24-months from the successful IPO; and, 1/3 vesting after 36-months from the successful IPO. You must be an employee of the Company or one of its affiliates on the applicable vesting date to receive such shares. 

Should there be a business sale instead of an IPO, you will receive $399,358 in cash in lieu of Restricted Stock. For purposes hereof, a business sale means a
sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or a sale of more than 50% of the equity of the Company or such entity. This cash payment will be made in the following manner: 

1⁄2 Payable
30-days post-closing of the sale 
 1⁄2 Payable 180-days post-closing of the sale 
 This memo does not change your
status as an “at-will” employee and does not guarantee your employment for any specific period of time. The Company reserves the right to terminate you at any time and for any or no reason. Any
Restricted Stock issued or cash payment made pursuant to this memo shall be subject to regular tax withholdings and other authorized deductions and will not be treated as compensation for any purpose under any benefit plans or programs, unless
statutorily required. 
 This memo is provided to summarize the agreement that has been reached in this regard between the Company and the employee. Should
an IPO be completed, a formal grant letter for the Restricted Stock will be provided to the employee that documents all terms and conditions related to the grant. 

//s// Steve Estes