alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harold Schottenfeld, Appellant, v Elaine Schottenfeld, Respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), dated May 25, 1988, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In order to obtain a divorce on the ground of constructive abandonment, the plaintiff husband attempted to prove that the defendant wife had, for more than a year, refused to engage in normal sexual relations with him, without justification. A review of the record reveals that the plaintiff succeeded in establishing a prima facie case based on this theory *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 170 [2]; *Caprise v Caprise,*143 AD2d 968; *Gunn v Gunn,*143 AD2d 393, 395). However, the defendant wife adduced evidence which tended to prove that it was not she who was responsible for the suspension of the parties’ sexual activity, but that it was instead the plaintiff husband who had persistently resisted her efforts to induce the resumption of normal marital intimacy. Resolution of this case thus required the trier of fact to assess the relative credibility of the principal witnesses. We are reluctant to substitute our judgment as to credibility for that of the trial court, which, having observed the witnesses as they testified, was in a far better position to make such an assessment. Considering that the plaintiff bore the burden of proof, we cannot say that the decision of the trial court was against the weight of the evidence.

We have examined the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Clear All

        17 February 2023    

                    Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Completes Arctic Training Exercise Snow Crab Ex                 
                LITTLE FALLS, Minn. –U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) completed Snow Crab Exercise (Snow Crab Ex) 23-1 this week following the departure of U.S Navy EOD units and Navy Divers at Camp Ripley in Little Falls, Minnesota.            

        06 February 2023    

                    Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Hosts Arctic Training Exercise Snow Crab Ex                 
                LITTLE FALLS, Minn. –U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) commenced Snow Crab Exercise (Snow Crab Ex) 23-1 Feb. 4, 2023 following the arrival of U.S Navy EOD Mobile Units (EODMU) and Navy Divers at Camp Ripley in Little Falls, Minn.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q of  Public  Storage
Properties IV, Ltd. (the  "Partnership") for the quarterly period ended December
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  Ronald L. Havner,  Jr., as Chief  Executive  Officer of Public
Storage,  Inc., and John Reyes,  as Chief  Financial  Officer of Public Storage,
Inc., each hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant
toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Partnership.

/s/  Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
------------------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    March 29, 2004

/s/  John Reyes
------------------------------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    March 29, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2004199EN.01000401.xml

| 6.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/4

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping and countervailing measures

(2004/C 199/05)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was received, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping and countervailing measures mentioned below have expired.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2) and with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community (3).

2

3

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Stainless steel wire with a diameter of 1 mm or more | India | Anti-dumping duty | Regulation (EC) No 1600/1999 (OJ L 189, 22.7.1999, p. 19) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1294/2004 (OJ L 244, 16.7.2004, p. 1) | 23.7.2004 |
| Stainless steel wire with a diameter of 1 mm or more | India | Countervailing duty | Regulation (EC) No 1599/1999 (OJ L 189, 22.7.1999, p. 1) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1295/2004 (OJ L 244, 16.7.2004, p. 5) | 23.7.2004 |
| Stainless steel wire with a diameter of less than 1 mm | India | Countervailing duty | Regulation (EC) No 1601/1999 (OJ L 189, 22.7.1999, p. 26), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1323/2004 (OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 14) | 23.7.2004 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Stainless steel wire with a diameter of 1 mm or more

India

Anti-dumping duty

Regulation (EC) No 1600/1999 (OJ L 189, 22.7.1999, p. 19) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1294/2004 (OJ L 244, 16.7.2004, p. 1)

23.7.2004

Stainless steel wire with a diameter of 1 mm or more

India

Countervailing duty

Regulation (EC) No 1599/1999 (OJ L 189, 22.7.1999, p. 1) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1295/2004 (OJ L 244, 16.7.2004, p. 5)

23.7.2004

Stainless steel wire with a diameter of less than 1 mm

India

Countervailing duty

Regulation (EC) No 1601/1999 (OJ L 189, 22.7.1999, p. 26), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1323/2004 (OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 14)

23.7.2004

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 24.10.2003, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

2

(3)  OJ L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

3

---
# C_2004305EN.01000401.xml

| 9.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/4

---

FINAL REPORT OF THE HEARING OFFICER IN CASE COMP/38.284/D2 (AIR FRANCE/ALITALIA)

FINAL REPORT OF THE HEARING OFFICER IN CASE

(pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of hearing officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2004/C 305/04)

The draft decision in the abovementioned case gives rise to the following observations:

On 13 November 2001, Air France and Alitalia, notified various agreements to the Commission seeking negative clearance under Article 3(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87 or alternatively exemption under Article 5 of the same Regulation.

A summary of the application was published on 8 May 2002 in the Official Journal of the European Communities inviting third parties and the Member States to submit their comments to the Commission within 30 days in accordance with Article 5(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87.

Official Journal of the European Communities

On 1 July 2002, the Commission notified the parties pursuant to Article 5(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87 that there were serious doubts as to the applicability of Articles 81(3) of the Treaty to the notified agreements.

After discussions with the Commission services, the parties proposed commitments that were published on 9 December 2003 pursuant to Article 16(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87, inviting all interested third parties to submit their observations.

Several airlines and the United Kingdom Office of Fair Trading made comments on the proposed remedies and the parties accepted to improve their commitments, with the result that the competition concerns of the Commission services have been removed.

I therefore conclude that the rights to be heard have been respected in the present case.

Brussels, 18 March 2004.

Serge DURANDE

---
Case 1:07-cv-05298-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-01526-AKH Document 19 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01526-AKH Document 19 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01526-AKH Document 19 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  about 

#           Documents      

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

This is a collection of supporting documents to include instructions, training materials, technical memos, flowcharts, analytical references, and more. 

Official USGS Publications

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Nautiloid Paper Model Instructions

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Triceratops Paper Model Instructions

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Pterosaur Paper Model Instructions

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Nautiloid Paper Model - Colored Version

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Nautiloid Paper Model - Black and White Version

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Pterosaur Paper Model - Colored Version

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Pterosaur Paper Model - Black and White Version

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Triceratops Paper Model - Black and White Version

**File icon

May 25, 2023

####   Triceratops Paper Model - Colored Version

**File icon

May 11, 2023

####   2021 BPIF annual project summaries

**File icon

May 11, 2023

####   2022 BPIF annual meeting minutes

**File icon

May 11, 2023

####   2022 BPIF annual project summaries

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
- ...
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
-                Current page            6 
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Page            9 
-                Page            10 
- ...
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
The Board of Visitors for the National Fire Academy (NFA) supports the academic stature of the NFA.

Learn more about the Board of Visitors’ members and review annual reports and minutes from past meetings.

## April 22 agenda
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Richard Darby, Appellant

No. 06-15-00045-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 102nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 14-F00180-102). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter,* Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley* participating. 

*Justice Carter, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect a conviction against 

Richard Taylor Darby, III. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Richard Darby, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 30, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#                                                 Adm. Daryl Caudle                                                                                            

#### MASHANTUCKET, Conn.

#### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command

09 April 2022**Strategic Deterrence   ****In Operations*****whisper*****On the Maintenance Front****And in the Tactical Development world****Proud Legacy   *****Closing   ***

Tags:
**submarine**SUBMARINE BALL**Submarine birthday
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20651

EDWARD HALL; LARRY DELEON; CHARLES HENDERSON;

BRENDA BENNETT,

Plaintiffs–Appellants,

versus

EL DORADO CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant–Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CV-2528

Before SMITH, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Plaintiffs sued under various common-law theories, seeking damages

from the accidental discharge of smoke and noxious gas resulting from a plant

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 12, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

 Case: 12-20651 Document: 00512337935 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2013
No. 12-20651

fire. Plaintiffs sought compensation for having to evacuate their nearby houses

and businesses, for the loss of and use of their houses and businesses, and for

inconvenience, annoyance, lost earnings , and economic loss from business

closures, plus exemplary damages. The district court adopted the thorough

Memorandum and Recommendation ofthe magistrate judge and dismissed the

action.

Regarding the negligence claim, the magistrate judge reasoned, in summary, “that Plaintiffs may not recover for annoyance and inconvenience

without some physical injury and that the economic loss rule negates the

existence of a duty on the part of Defendant to prevent Plaintiffs’ remaining

damages.” Also, “Defendant’s alleged negligent conduct is not comparable to

any category for which recovery has been allowed by any Texas court.”

Further, “[i]n the absence of contractual privity and physical damage, the

economic loss rule applies, and Plaintiffs are thus precluded from recovering

their alleged economic damages.”

We have reviewed the briefs, the applicable law, and pertinent portions

of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. The judgment of

dismissal is fully consistent with current Texas law and is thus AFFIRMED,

essentially for the reasons carefully explained by the magistrate judge.

2

 Case: 12-20651 Document: 00512337935 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/12/2013
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RemoteMDx, Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief
Executive Officer, and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                        /s/ David G. Derrick
                      -------------------------------------
                      David G. Derrick
                      Chief Executive Officer
                      RemoteMDx, Inc.


                        /s/ Michael G. Acton
                      ------------------------------------
                      Michael G. Acton
                      Chief Financial Officer (Chief Accounting Officer)



Dated: May 17, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00093

- CV

Donald W. TAYLOR

, Appellant

v.

THE RENEGADE RANCH SUBDIVISION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS and Treasure: Brian and Dixon Schultz, Kevin an d Cynthia Gallagher, Secondary Committee Member, Co

- Treasure Jeffrey C. and Vada Michelle Pitts, Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court

, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16772 Honorable Dennis Powell , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due Ju ly 25, 2022

. Appellant’s first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to August 24 , 20 22

. On August 23 , 20 22

, appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until September 23 , 20 22 , for a total extension of 60 days , and we granted appellant’s motion

.

On September 21 , 20 22 , appellant filed a third motion for extension of time requesting a n additional 90 days to file the brief

. A fter consideration, we GRANT the motion IN PART and ORDER appellant to file his brief by OCTOBER 2 3 , 2022

. Appellant is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of September, 2022

.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 86 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 86

   To eliminate an unused lighthouse reservation, provide management 
consistency by bringing the rocks and small islands along the coast of 
 Orange County, California, and meet the original Congressional intent 
 of preserving Orange County's rocks and small islands, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To eliminate an unused lighthouse reservation, provide management 
consistency by bringing the rocks and small islands along the coast of 
 Orange County, California, and meet the original Congressional intent 
 of preserving Orange County's rocks and small islands, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESERVATION OF ROCKS AND SMALL ISLANDS ALONG THE COAST OF 
              ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) California Coastal National Monument.--The Act of February 18, 
1931, entitled ``An act to reserve for public use rocks, pinnacles, 
reefs, and small islands along the seacoast of Orange County, 
California'' is amended by striking ``temporarily reserved'' and all 
that follows through ``United States'' and inserting ``part of the 
California Coastal National Monument and shall be administered as 
such''.
    (b) Repeal of Reservation.--Section 31 of the Act of May 28, 1935, 
entitled ``An act to authorize the Secretary of Commerce to dispose of 
certain lighthouse reservations, and for other purposes'' is hereby 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 20.2
**AFCO CREDIT CORPORATION**
**MELLON BANK PREMIUM FINANCE LOAN MASTER TRUST**
     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of AFCO Credit Corporation(“AFCO”), as Servicer, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June15, 2001 (as may be amended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), amongMellon Premium Finance Loan Owner Trust, as Transferor, AFCO Credit Corporation, asServicer, AFCO Acceptance Corporation, as Servicer, Premium Financing Specialists, Inc.,as Back-up Servicer, Premium Financing Specialists of California, Inc., as Back-upServicer and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, does herebycertify that:
 1.  AFCO is, as of the date hereof, Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.  2.  The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized pursuantto the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to Trustee.  3.  A review of the activities of Servicer during the fiscal year endingDecember 31, 2004, and of its performance under the Agreement was conductedunder my supervision.  4.  Based on such review, Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligationshas occurred or is continuing.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this28th day of March, 2005.           AFCO CREDIT CORPORATION, as Servicer              By: /s/      Bruce R. Gold                        Name: Bruce R. Gold       Title: Senior Vice President, Treasurer       and Chief Financial Officer  
E - 3