alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001046001
<NAME> DELAWARE FIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,434
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          12,282
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,407
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         80,627
<ALLOWANCE>                                        465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,057
<DEPOSITS>                                      68,951
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,100
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,919
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               12
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 101,057
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,017
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  774
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,791
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,940
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,687
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,014
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     14
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          14
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         8
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.88
<LOANS-NON>                                        174
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   113
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    681
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   463
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       43
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  465
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               302
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            163
                                

</TABLE>
J-A32015-14

*Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

2015 PA Super 29

R.L.P., IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

R.F.M.,

Appellee No. 1540 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered October 14, 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County

Civil Division at No(s): 2010-06638

BEFORE: PANELLA, OLSON and FITZGERALD,* JJ.

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY OLSON, J.:FILED FEBRUARY 11, 2015

I agree with the learned Majority's conclusion that the substantive 

provisions of the trial court's custody order should be affirmed. I also concur 

in the Majority's assessment that the original transcribed version of the trial 

court's order, with its attendant exchanges between the court and counsel, 

is far too convoluted and confusing to comply with Rule 1915.10(b) of the 

Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. I write separately, however, as I am 

unable to agree with the mandatory nature of the Majority's solution to the 

present problem; to wit the Majority's holding that, "in order to be 

sufficiently specific to be enforced, an order of custody must be entered as a 

separate written order, or as a separate section of a written opinion" 

designated under the heading of "Order." See Majority Opinion at 1-2 and 7 

(emphasis added).
J-A32015-14

- 2 -

As the Majority suggests, it is self-evident that, in many if not most 

cases, the process of preparing a separate written order will provide the trial 

court with an opportunity to organize its thoughts and coherently articulate 

the intended terms of its adjudicatory directive. The format of an order is no 

guarantee, however, that it will be sufficiently clear and specific to merit 

enforcement, as Pa.R.C.P. 1915.10(b) requires. Moreover, nothing in our 

procedural or appellate rules, or the relevant interpretive case law, dictates 

the precise format of an appealable or enforceable order.1 Accordingly, 

unlike my learned colleagues, I would conduct any inquiry under Rule 

1915.10(b) on a case-by case basis and allow remand for confirmation or 

clarification, as occurred in the present case, where an order does not meet 

the "sufficiently specific" criteria of that provision.

____________________________________________

1 Our appellate rules provide that “no order of a court shall be appealable 

until it has been entered upon the appropriate docket in the lower court,” 

Pa.R.A.P. 301(a)(1), and that “[e]very order shall be set forth on a separate 

document.” Pa.R.A.P. 301(b). In my view, so long as the transcribed notes 

of testimony docketed as the trial court’s order are sufficiently clear and 

specific to permit enforcement of the terms of the court’s custody directive, 

then I believe that Pa.R.A.P. 301(a)(1) and (b) and Pa.R.C.P. 1915.10(b) 

have been satisfied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I,Charles N. Martin, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”),as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                       of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                      Charles N. Martin, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay 11, 2010
(105 So. 922)

#### J. D. ROY et al. v. B. F. ROSS.

(3 Div. 684.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 15, 1925.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Autauga County; in Equity; George F. Smoot, Judge.

Ballard & Page, of Prattville, for appellants.

Gipson & Booth, of Prattville, for appellee.

SOMERVILLE, J.

The question involved is one of fact. We agree with the findings of the trial court. The decree is affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge James Hamlin Bessette Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A 9(4a(r4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         864,889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,262,198
<PP&E>                                      38,199,263
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,252,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,225,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          436,648
<BONDS>                                     13,429,484
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,359,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,225,994
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,589,145
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,295,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,280,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,927,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,927,225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                225,438
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,671,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    41.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    41.38
        

</TABLE>
exv10w1



 








EXHIBIT 10.1




SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION OF JOHN C HODGMAN

AS SOLE DIRECTOR OF CYGNUS, INC.





	 	 	John C Hodgman shall receive a director’s fee of $5,000 per year for three years for his services
as sole director of Cygnus. The three year period will expire on November 21, 2008. The aggregate
director’s fee of $15,000 for all three years will be paid to Mr. Hodgman on December 23, 2005,
subject to an undertaking that Mr. Hodgman will repay a prorated amount of the fees should he cease
serving prior to November 21, 2008.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William Keiper, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hypercom Corporation.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 9, 2006 By:  /s/ William Keiper    William Keiper    Chief Executive Officer and President
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1681 

To require States to impose the same ballot access rules on all candidates 

in a general congressional election held in the State without regard 

to whether or not the candidates are nominees of a political party, 

and to require States to use a ballot for a general congressional election 

that requires a specific vote for a candidate for the office involved. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2019 

Mr. AMASH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To require States to impose the same ballot access rules 

on all candidates in a general congressional election held 

in the State without regard to whether or not the candidates are nominees of a political party, and to require 

States to use a ballot for a general congressional election 

that requires a specific vote for a candidate for the 

office involved. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ballot Fairness Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1681 IH

1 SEC. 2. BALLOT FAIRNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL 

2 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS. 

3 (a) REQUIRING EQUIVALENT BALLOT ACCESS

4 RULES FOR ALL CANDIDATES IN GENERAL ELECTION.— 

5 A State shall impose the same requirements for appearing 

6 on the ballot in a general congressional election held in 

7 the State on all candidates in the election, without regard 

8 to whether or not a candidate is the nominee of a political 

9 party. 

10 (b) REQUIRING USE OF BALLOTS THAT REQUIRE

11 SPECIFIC VOTES FOR CANDIDATE.—For the election of 

12 a candidate in a general congressional election held in a 

13 State, the State shall use a ballot that requires a specific 

14 vote for that candidate for the office involved and that 

15 does not permit the casting of a single vote for all can16 didates of the same political party for multiple elections. 

17 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act, the following defini18 tions apply: 

19 (1) The term ‘‘general congressional election’’ 

20 means a general election for the office of Senator or 

21 Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commis22 sioner to, the Congress. 

23 (2) The term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several 

24 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth 

25 of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1681 IH

1 States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the 

2 Northern Mariana Islands. 

3 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with 

4 respect to the regularly scheduled general congressional 

5 election held in November 2020 and each succeeding gen6 eral congressional election. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                               <C>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                  2,040                           516
<SECURITIES>                                0                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                          10,221                        10,304
<ALLOWANCES>                              392                           385
<INVENTORY>                             2,222                         2,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       15,318                        13,484
<PP&E>                                  9,157                         8,804
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,810                         1,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         65,173                        66,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  21,660                        30,257
<BONDS>                                     0                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0                             0
<PREFERRED>                                 0                             0
<COMMON>                               53,411                        52,764
<OTHER-SE>                           (16,350)                      (16,435)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           65,173                        66,804
<SALES>                                 2,572                         2,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       14,693                        15,482
<CGS>                                   1,541                         1,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           9,228                         9,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        4,462                         4,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0                           827
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        589                           532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           414                         (442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       414                         (442)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0                             0
<NET-INCOME>                              414                         (442)
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.06                        (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.06                        (0.07)




</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 2940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission

Sunshine Act Notice; Public Announcement

    Pursuant To The Government In the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) 
[5 U.S.C. Section 552b].

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, January 17, 2001.

PLACE: 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the open 
Parole Commission meeting:
    1. Approval of minutes of previous Commission meeting.
    2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, Legal, Chief of Staff, 
Case Operations, and Administrative Sections.
    3. Adoption of Rule for attorney qualifications for District of 
Columbia Code cases similar to Rule adopted for federal cases at 28 CFR 
Sec. 2.61.
    4. Adoption of Final Version of the U.S. Parole Commission Rules 
and Procedures Manual.

AGENCY CONTACT: Sam Robertson, Case Operations, United States Parole 
Commission, (301) 492-5962.

    Dated: January 9, 2001.
Michael A. Stover,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-1160 Filed 1-10-01; 10:55 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
```
Case 1:07-cv-01515-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1750 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1750

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide financial assistance 
    for supportive services for very low-income veteran families in 
                           permanent housing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2019

 Mr. Zeldin (for himself, Ms. Stefanik, and Mr. Suozzi) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide financial assistance 
    for supportive services for very low-income veteran families in 
                           permanent housing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Veteran Families in Need 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR 
              SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR VERY LOW-INCOME VETERAN FAMILIES 
              IN PERMANENT HOUSING.

    Paragraph (1) of section 2044(e) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(H) The amounts that are appropriated to carry 
                out such subsections for fiscal year 2020 and each 
                fiscal year thereafter.''.
                                 <all>
```