alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Allison HAGER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 2011-5104.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 1, 2011.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The Secretary of Health and Human Services moves to stay proceedings in this case pending the court’s disposition of *Porter v. HHS,*No.2010-5162 and *Knight ex rel. Rotoli v. HHS,*No.2010-5163. Allison Hager opposes. The Secretary replies. The Secretary also moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of time to file its brief.

The Secretary asserts that there is a substantial overlap in the legal and factual issues between this case and *Porter*and *Rotoli,*that all three appeals arise out of a single decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims, and that the Court of Federal Claims’ reasons for setting aside the special masters’ decisions, and for crediting petitioners’ medical theories, were virtually identical in all three cases.

The court notes that this court heard oral argument in *Porter*and *Rotoli*on August 2, 2011.

Accordingly, '

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The Secretary is directed to inform the court within 30 days of the disposition of *Porter*and *Rotoli*how this appeal should proceed. Hager may also respond within that time.

(2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear *Porter*and *Rotoli*

(3) The motion for an extension of time is moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1803 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1803

To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2019

  Mr. Walden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF TREATY.

    The Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America and 
the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
concluded on November 15, 1865, and entered into pursuant to the Senate 
resolution of ratification dated March 2, 1867 (14 Stat. 751), shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: The State of Texas v. Keirra Peterson

Appellate case number: 01-19-00137-CR

Trial court case number: 1529626

Trial court: 177th District Court of Harris County

Appellee, Keirra Peterson, has filed her third motion to extend time to file her brief, 

seeking a 30-day extension for a total of 138 days since appellee’s brief was originally due 

on August 14, 2019. Appellant filed this motion notwithstanding the Court’s prior 

admonishment that no further extensions would be granted. The Court grants appellee’s 

motion and orders appellee to file her brief on or before January 13, 2020.

No further extensions will be granted. If appellee does not file her brief by January 

13, 2020, the Court will abate this appeal and remand to the trial court to immediately 

conduct a hearing to determine, among other things, whether good cause exists to relieve 

appellee’s appointed counsel, Natalie L. Schultz, of her duties and appoint new counsel. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: _December 12, 2019___
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6527** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
ROBERT TOMONE NEBLETT , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:09

- cr - 00301

- HEH

- 1 )

Submitted : July 24 , 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert Tomone Neblett, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica D. Aber, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Angela Mastandrea

- Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not b inding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Robert Tomone Neblett appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion for reduction o f
sentence based on substantial ass istance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Neblett , No. 3:09

- cr - 00301

- HEH

- 1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because t he facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 14-3 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001046002
<NAME> ALLIANCE BANCORP OF NEW ENGLAND, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,890
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,799
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,118
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          17,737
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,929
<LOANS>                                        172,295
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 252,004
<DEPOSITS>                                     227,285
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,230
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,439
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               25
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 252,004
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,576
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  946
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    97
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,619
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,275
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,339
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,280
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       10
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 183
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    968
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         968
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.10
<LOANS-NON>                                        468
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    13
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,587
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,040
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      316
<RECOVERIES>                                       188
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,040
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,040
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,234
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices 

# Order

September 29, 2017

153980

- 1

_________________________________________

In re Estate of JAMES ERWIN, SR.

_________________________________________

BEATRICE KING, Individually and as Personal

Representative for the Estate of JAMES ERWIN,

SR.,

Appellant,

v SC: 153980

COA: 323387

Saginaw PC: 13

- 130558

- DE

JACQUELINE E. NASH, BILLY J. ERWIN,

DEMARKIUS ERWIN, MAGGIE ERWIN, and

STACY ER WIN OAKES,

Appellees.

_________________________________________/

In re Estate of JAMES ERWIN, SR.

_________________________________________

BEATRICE KING,

Appellant,

v SC: 153981

COA: 329264

Saginaw PC: 13

- 130558

- DE

JACQUELINE E. NASH, BILLY J. ERWIN,

DEMARKIUS ERWIN, MAGGIE ERWIN,

STACY ERWIN OAKES, and DOUGLAS

TAYLOR,

Appellees.

_________________________________________/I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2017

s0926 2

Clerk On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

address: (1) whether the “willfully absent” provision in MCL 700.2801(2)(e)( i ) is

defined exclusively by physical se paration, or whether it includes consideration of the

emotional bonds and connections between spouses, compare In re Estate of Erwin

, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued May 10, 2016 (Docket

Nos. 323387, 329264), at 5, with In re Peterson Estate , 315 Mich App 423, 432 (2016);

and (2) whether MCL 700.2801(2)(e)( i ) requires proof that a spouse intends to abandon

his or her marital rights, compare Matter of Estate of Harris , 151 Mich App 780, 786

(1986), with In re Peterson Estate , 3 15 Mich App at 433.

The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR

7.314(B)(1).

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
1517 WEST F RONT S TREET  S UITE 354  TYLER , TX 75702  T EL : 903-593-8471  FAX : 903-593-2193 Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van Zandt and Wood Counties www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us C HIEF J USTICE J AMES T. W ORTHEN J USTICES B RIAN H OYLE G REG N EELEY 

# TWELFTH 

# C OURT OF 

# A PPEALS C LERK C ATHY S. L USK C HIEF S TAFF A TTORNEY M ARGARET H USSEY 

## April 9, 2015 Ms. Lois Rogers District Clerk, Smith County Courthouse, Suite 204 100 North Broadway Avenue Tyler, TX 75702-7201 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Case Number: 12-15-00034-CR, 12-15-00035-CR, 12-15-00036-CR Trial Court Case Number: 241-2620-06-A, 241-2621-06-A, 241-2622-06-A Style: Donald Lee Gray v. The State of Texas Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the Mandate issued in the above causes. When the District or County Clerk has executed the Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the information below and to return the attached copy to this office. Very truly yours, CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK By:_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk CC: Mr. James W. Volberding (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mandate executed on __ 10th day of __ APRIL______________, 2015. Brief explanation of action taken: ____ SCANNNED ____________________________________

___________LINDA RHYMES ____________________________________District/County Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<MULTIPLIER>               1000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        960
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               6,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                  103
<INVENTORY>                                13,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           21,216
<PP&E>                                     16,018
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             38,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,426
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                   840
<COMMON>                                    3,192
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,213)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               38,072
<SALES>                                     8,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            8,271
<CGS>                                       5,876
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               7,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               58
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (399)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (399)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001046002
<NAME> ALLIANCE BANCORP OF NEW ENGLAND, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,448
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                19,550
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     59,020
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,750
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            28,494
<LOANS>                                        187,182
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 310,480
<DEPOSITS>                                     244,458
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,147
<LONG-TERM>                                     39,504
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 310,480
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,716
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,566
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   194
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,476
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,241
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,837
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,639
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       17
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (19)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,019
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,019
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       738
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.79
<LOANS-NON>                                        614
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,770
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,200
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       71
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,150
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,150
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            610


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 32 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 32 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
DOCSNY-271506v01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

ARMANDO GUZMAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

ALAN KASMAN D/B/A KASCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05556-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 October 3, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 25 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Clear All

        01 February 2021    

#                     Fleet Forces, Installations Conduct Force Protection Exercise                 

                The Navy is conducting a series of security exercises nationwide to enhance the readiness of its security forces Feb. 1-12.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1822 

To provide acquisition requirements for Coast Guard Polar Security Cutters, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2019 

Mr. GIBBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide acquisition requirements for Coast Guard Polar 

Security Cutters, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Polar Security Cutter 

5 Acquisition Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. POLAR SECURITY CUTTER ACQUISITION REQUIRE7 MENTS. 

8 (a) COAST GUARD AND MARITIME TRANSPORTATION

9 ACT OF 2012.—Section 222 of the Coast Guard and MariVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:58 Apr 02, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1822.IH H1822

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1822 IH

1 time Transportation Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–213) 

2 is amended by— 

3 (1) redesignating subsection (c) as subsection 

4 (d); and 

5 (2) inserting after subsection (b) the following: 

6 ‘‘(c) ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability 

8 of appropriations, in acquiring any polar icebreaker, 

9 except for an icebreaker authorized under the Na10 tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

11 2018 (Public Law 115–91), the Commandant of the 

12 Coast Guard shall— 

13 ‘‘(A) limit military specifications for such 

14 vessel to armament, aviation capabilities, com15 munications equipment, and navigation equip16 ment, as described in the letter report, unless 

17 funding is provided from other than appropria18 tions for the Department of Homeland Secu19 rity; 

20 ‘‘(B) ensure specifications and key draw21 ings are complete before awarding the contract 

22 for construction; 

23 ‘‘(C) ensure detail design of the vessel is 

24 complete before the start of construction; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1822 IH

1 ‘‘(D) to the extent practicable, use the 

2 block-buy contract authority provided under 

3 section 1137 of title 14, United States Code; 

4 and 

5 ‘‘(E) ensure all icebreaker hulls are science 

6 ready and icebreaker hull number four is 

7 science capable, as described in the letter re8 port. 

9 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

10 ‘letter report’ means the National Academies of 

11 Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Committee on 

12 Polar Icebreaker Cost Assessment letter report enti13 tled ‘Acquisition and Operation of Polar Icebreakers: 

14 Fulfilling the Nation’s Needs’ and dated July 11, 

15 2017.’’. 

16 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.— 

17 (1) CORRECTION.—Section 207(a)(6) of the 

18 Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015 (Public Law 

19 114–120) is amended by striking ‘‘in subsection (d) 

20 (’’ and inserting ‘‘in subsection (e) (’’. 

21 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

22 by paragraph (1) shall be effective upon the enact23 ment of such Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS