alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.5





 Exhibit 4.5 

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF

 SUNTRUST PREFERRED CAPITAL I 

THIS Certificate of Trust of SunTrust Preferred Capital I (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by
the undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del.C. § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”). 

1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is SunTrust Preferred Capital I. 

2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, 300 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trust Services Division. 
 3. Effective
Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State. 
 4. Counterparts. This Certificate
of Trust may be executed in one or more counterparts. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in
accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act. 
  

	
	 /s/ Raymond D. Fortin

	Raymond D. Fortin
	Administrative Trustee


  

	
	 /s/ Jerome T. Lienhard, II

	Jerome T. Lienhard, II
	Administrative Trustee


  

	
	 /s/ Kenneth R. Houghton

	Kenneth R. Houghton
	Administrative Trustee














 
			
	 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 as
Property Trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Earl W. Dennison Jr.

	Name:	 	Earl W. Dennison Jr.
	Title:	 	Vice President


  

			
	 U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION,
 as Delaware Trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Earl W. Dennison Jr.

	Name:	 	Earl W. Dennison Jr.
	Title:	 	Vice President
Clear All

        11 August 2022    

                    25th Annual RoboSub Competition Showcases an Autonomous Future                 
                ARLINGTON, Va. - This past week, the 25th Annual RoboSub competition occurred at the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland. RoboSub is an international robotics competition where student teams design, build, test and operate their own robotic submarines — autonomous underwater vehicles            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7724

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES JEROME ADAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-91-291, CA-98-201-1-MC-6)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Jerome Adams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for extension of time to file his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v.

Adams, Nos. CR-91-291; CA-98-201-1-MC-6 (D.S.C. Nov. 4, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21768-21769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 00N-1502]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Adverse Experience Reporting for Licensed Biological Products 
and General Records

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Adverse Experience Reporting for 
Licensed Biological Products and General Records'' has been approved by 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of December 26, 2000 
(65 FR 81528), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to,

[[Page 21769]]

a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has 
assigned OMB control number 0910-0308. The approval expires on April 
31, 2003. A copy of the supporting statement for this information 
collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: April 24, 2001.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 01-10710 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH     Document 27      Filed 04/10/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05742-RJH     Document 27      Filed 04/10/2008     Page 2 of 2
#                                                                         Sailors enhance medical expeditionary training with new program                                                                     

##### by NMRTC Charleston Public Affairs

12 December 2023CHARLESTON, S.C.  -- 

                Members of Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command (NMRTC) Charleston practice low light IV insertions during Fleet Readiness Operational Sustainment Training (FROST). FROST provides a basic understanding and skill set related to operational and expeditionary medical platforms. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. Cmdr. Aaron Cagley).            

                Practicing Low Light IV Insertions            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Lt. Cmdr. Aaron Cagley

VIRIN: 231201-N-XV435-3132

Tags:
**Expeditionary Medicine**Fleet Readiness and Operational Sustainment Training**FROST**Navy medicine**NMFL
Clear All

        24 January 2023    

                    Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 5 Completes Training in Bizë, Albania                 
                ADRIATIC SEA - Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 5 completed inland training using an Albanian range in Bizë, Albania, Jan. 15-17, 2023.            

        16 November 2022    

                    Three Flyovers in One Day for Hampton Roads Squadrons                  
                NORFOLK, Va. - Two Hampton Roads squadrons conducted flyovers for three local college football games in honor of Veterans Day, November 12.             

        04 October 2022    

                    Navy Engineers Make Helicopter Pilots’ Most Dangerous Job Safer                 
                Landing a helicopter in low visibility environments is one of the most difficult tasks in aviation for a rotary-wing pilot; add weather like fog, wind or worse and aircraft recovery can be dangerous.            

        09 June 2022    

                    Navy Helicopter crashes near El Centro, Calif.; all 4 air crew survived                 
                This evening at approximately 6 p.m., an MH-60S Seahawk crashed near El Centro, Calif. while conducting a routine training flight from Naval Air Facility El Centro.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Clear All

        13 February 2024    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet forward deploys for Steadfast Defender 2024                 
                A contingent of more than 100 U.S. 2nd Fleet and Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG) 2 personnel are forward deployed to Bodø, Norway to establish a maritime command element, Commander Task Force North (CTF-N), in support of the NATO exercise Steadfast Defender 2024.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-2 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-2 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 2 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-2 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 3 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-2 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 4 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-2 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 5 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-2 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 6 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-2 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 7 of 8Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 5-2 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 10.17

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
               COMDIAL CORPORATION EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN


         THIS FIRST  AMENDMENT  (the  "Amendment")  to the  Comdial  Corporation
Executive  Stock  Ownership  Plan  (the  "Plan")  is made as of July  31,  1997,
pursuant to the  authority of the Board of Directors of Comdial  Corporation  to
amend the Plan,  and shall be effective as of July 31, 1997.  Capitalized  terms
defined in the Plan shall have the same  meanings  when used in this  Amendment,
unless  otherwise  defined  herein or unless the context  expressly  requires an
alternate meaning.


         SECTION 1.        DEFINITIONS.

                  Section 1(b) is deleted and the  following is  substituted  in
lieu thereof:

                                  "(b)   'Executive'   shall   mean   only   the
                           individuals   employed   by  the   Company  as  Chief
                           Executive   Officer,   President,    Executive   Vice
                           President,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Financial
                           Officer, and Vice President."


         SECTION 2.        STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT.

                  Section 2(b) is deleted and the  following is  substituted  in
lieu thereof:

                                  "(b)  if  the  Executive  is  Executive   Vice
                           President,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Financial
                           Officer or Vice President of Engineering,  Stock with
                           a Value equal to 1.5 times Salary."


         SECTION 3.        STOCK ACQUISITION REQUIREMENT.

                  Section 3(a)(i)(B) is deleted and the following is substituted
in lieu thereof:

                                  "(B)  if  the  Executive  is  Executive   Vice
                           President,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Financial
                           Officer or Vice President of Engineering,  10 percent
                           of Salary, and"

         Except as amended  hereby,  all of terms of the Plan  shall  remain and
continue in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed in all respects.


                                             COMDIAL CORPORATION


                                             By:      /s/ Wayne R. Wilver
                                                      Wayne R. Wilver
                                                      Senior Vice President
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 799 

For the relief of Francisco Rivera and Alfonso Calderon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Francisco Rivera and Alfonso Calderon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF FRANCISCO RIVERA AND 

4 ALFONSO CALDERON. 

5 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

6 pay, out of funds not otherwise appropriated, an appro7 priate amount to compensate Francisco Rivera and Al8 fonso Calderon for costs related to and damages arising 

9 from their arrest, prosecution, and incarceration in Mexico 

10 as described in Claim No. 05–608C filed in the United 

11 States Court of Federal Claims. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 799 IH

1 (b) SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.—The payment under 

2 subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of all claims of 

3 Francisco Rivera and Alfonso Calderon against the United 

4 States in connection with the matter described in such 

5 subsection. 

6 (c) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Nothing in this 

7 Act shall be construed as an inference of liability on the 

8 part of the United States. 

9 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS’ AND AGENTS’ FEES. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for an amount 

11 exceeding 10 percent of the amount paid pursuant to sec12 tion 1 to be paid to, or received by, any agent or attorney 

13 for any service rendered in connection with the payment 

14 under this Act. 

15 (b) ENFORCEMENT.—Any person who violates sub16 section (a) shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 

17 fined under title 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### TUCKER ELECTRICAL CONST. CO., Respondent, v. DOBBINS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

July 27, 1894.)

Action by the Tucker Electrical Construction Company against Thomas Dobbins.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 366TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 23 rd day of March

, 2018 , the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

PLANO PARKWAY OFFICE

CONDOMINIUMS A/K/A PLANO

PARKWAY OFFICE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Appellant

No. 05

- 16

- 01397

- CV V.

BEVER PROPERTI ES, LLC, AND JESSE M. TAYLOR, D.D.S., P.A., Appellees On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 04855

- 2013. Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. Justices Francis and Brown participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED

.

It is ORDERED that appellees BEVER PROPERTIES, LLC, AND JESSE M.
TAYLOR, D.D.S., P.A. recover t heir costs of this appeal from appellant PLANO PARKWAY

OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS A/K/A PLANO PARKWAY OFFICE OWNERS ASSOCIATION.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.– 2

–

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 5th day of June, 2018. 

# 5 L M

LISA MATZ, Clerk
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20091

Summary Calendar

__________________

CLEMMIE RAY WICKWARE,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Director,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

 Respondent-Appellee.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. CA-H-93-1186

----------------------

(October 4, 1995)

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clemmie Ray Wickware has filed a motion for leave to file an

out-of-time brief in support of his motion for a certificate of

probable cause (CPC). The issuance of a CPC is required to take

an appeal from a final order in a habeas corpus proceeding only

"where the detention complained of arises out of process issued

by a State court." See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The issuance of a CPC
No. 95-20091 

-2-

is not necessary to provide appellate jurisdiction because

Wickware's complained of detention does not arise out of process

issued by a State court. Id. Thus, Wickware's motions for leave

to file an out-of-time brief and for a CPC are DENIED as

unnecessary. 

Wickware's petition must be construed as seeking relief

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because he is contesting the manner in

which his sentence is being executed by the Texas Parole Board. 

See Story v. Collins, 920 F.2d 1247, 1250 (5th Cir. 1991)

(jurisdiction over state prisoner's good conduct claim is based

on § 2241 rather than § 2254). Wickware has not shown that he is

entitled to § 2241 relief inasmuch as he has received the

presentence credits to which he argues he is entitled.

This court previously affirmed the dismissal of Wickware's

suit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials

for an alleged conspiracy to miscalculate time served. Wickware

v. Stice, No. 94-40480 (5th Cir. Oct. 12, 1994) (unpublished;

copy attached). The court noted that "the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals responded to Wickware's post-conviction writ of

habeas corpus by granting relief and ordering the prison system

to grant Wickware additional time credit." Id. at op. p. 2. 

Given that Wickware has pursued his quest for presentence

credits despite the relief he received from the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals and this court's recognition of the same, the

instant petition is frivolous. Wickware is hereby warned that

the filing of frivolous appeals in the future will result in

sanctions, monetary or otherwise. See, e.g., Smith v. McCleod,
No. 95-20091 

-3-

946 F.2d 417, 418 (5th Cir. 1991); Jackson v. Carpenter, 921 F.2d

68, 69 (5th Cir. 1991).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Clear All

        27 February 2024    

                    Navy Pins First Robotics Warfare Specialist                 
                The Chief of Naval Personnel, Vice Adm. Rick Cheeseman, and the Navy’s Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13) Director, Rear Adm. Jim Waters, pinned Master Chief Christopher Rambert as the Navy’s first Robotics Warfare Specialist during an office call at Naval Support Facility            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10227

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CANDACE CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:11-CR-31-2

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Candace Clark has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Clark has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-10227 Document: 00512539814 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
No. 13-10227

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-10227 Document: 00512539814 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014