alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pre-IA Tour Post-IA Tour

IA Type:

Parent Command

Reporting Senior

Parent Command

Reporting Senior

Supported Commander

(In-Theater)

Parent Command

Reporting Senior

Reservist

Regular Report: Detachment of 

Individual (recommended for 

Reservists on Active Duty >90 

days)

Summary Group: As 

appropriate (e.g. detachment 1 

of 1 summary group)

N/A

Regular Report(s): Maintain regular 

continuity (e.g. Periodic, Detachment 

of Individual/Supported Commander)

Summary Group: Mobilized Reservists 

(Do not use INDIV AUG)

Regular Report(s): Resume regular 

report continuity (e.g. Periodic, 

Detachment of Individual/Supported 

Commander)

Summary Group: Resume normal 

summary group 

GSA

Regular Report: Normal 

Regular Report with PCS to 

ECRC (e.g. Detachment of 

Individual, extension letter)

Summary Group: As 

appropriate (e.g. 1 of 1 

detachment of IA)

Regular Report(s): ECRC 

provides regular NOB reports

Summary Group: N/A for NOB

Concurrent Report(s): Periodic, 

detachment of IA or detachment of 

concurrent reporting senior (officers 

only) 

Summary Group: Utilize INDIV AUG

Regular Report(s): ECRC provides regular 

NOB reports for continuity until IA 

executes PCS 

Summary Group: N/A for NOB

Regular Report(s): Resume regular 

report continuity (e.g. periodic, 

detachment of individual or regular 

reporting senior)

Summary Group: Utilize INDIV AUG for 

IAs with reporting period end dates 

occurring less than 180 days after IA 

completion (not applicable after IA 

transfers to new command)

Regular Report(s): Resume regular 

report continuity (e.g. periodic, 

detachment of individual or regular 

reporting senior)

Summary Group: Do not utilize INDIV 

AUG for IAs with reporting period end 

dates occurring more than 180 days 

after IA completion 

IA Tour

OSA/IAMM

Regular Report: Maintain regular report continuity (as OSA and 

IAMM are TDY no detachment of individual is required)

Summary Group: Utilize normal summary group (do not use 

INDIV AUG) for IAs whose report period ends while on IA 

assignment and who have been onboard parent command for 

240 days or more.

Regular Report: Maintain regular report continuity (as OSA and 

IAMM are TDY no detachment of individual is required)

Summary Group: Utilize INDIV AUG summary group for IAs 

whose report period ends while on IA assignment and who have 

been onboard for less than 240 days or whose period of 

performance is less than 240 days.

Concurrent Report(s): Periodic, 

detachment of IA or of concurrent 

reporting senior (officers only) 

Summary Group: Utilize INDIV AUG

Note: Concurrent/Regular reports may 

be utilized with advance agreement 

however: maintain continuity with last 

regular report (overlapping permitted) 

and 90 days periods not covered by 

Regular reporting senior prior to IA 

may be covered with 

concurrent/regular INDIV AUG report.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the "
Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
C. Benoit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ David C. Benoit
--------------------
David C. Benoit
Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Roxanna TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-40113

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 3, 2013.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Roxanna Torres, Bryan, TX, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roxanna Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Torres has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th CiR. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### KENNETH CLARK *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17434.

*Robert J. Scheinblum,*assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

*Kent Drager,*senior assistant public defender, in opposition.

Decided May 17, 2005

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 178 (AC 24683), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the extradition warrant in the present case was void and that the extradition was governed by General Statutes § 54-161?”
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed January 29, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00468
- CR ALEXIS DANIEL GRANAD OS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219
- 83352
- 2015 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers Alexis Daniel Granados pleaded guilty be fore a jury to the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a motor vehicle. After finding appellant guilty, t he jury assessed punishment at six years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which s he concludes the appe al is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See Hig h v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 81 2 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders ) . Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not f ile a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436– 2

–

S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) ( noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,
82 6

– 2 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment

.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 170468F.U05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
ALEXIS DANIEL GRANADOS, Appellant
No. 05

- 17

- 00468

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219

- 83352

- 2015. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers. Justices Fillmore and Stoddart participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered this 29th day of January, 2018.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.18



ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of ABM Industries Incorporated has approved a grant to you (the “Grantee”) of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) pursuant to the ABM Industries Incorporated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan as amended and restated on March 7, 2018 (the “Plan”), as described below. 


	
		
	Grantee Name:
	[                     ]

	Number of RSUs Granted:
	XXX

	Grant Date:
	[                     ]

	Vesting Schedule:
	[                     ]     






Provided you continue to provide services to the Company or any subsidiary or parent of the Company through the applicable vesting date, the RSUs will vest and restrictions will lapse as provided above.  Unvested RSUs may be subject to forfeiture if you terminate employment before the vesting date, as set forth in the Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto.  [Notwithstanding the preceding sentence and any provisions in the Statement of Terms and Conditions related to vesting upon termination for Retirement, Disability or death:


(A) In the event of your voluntary retirement from the Company at least one year following the Grant Date, after reaching the age of 60 and having completed 10 years of service, and subject to your continued compliance with any applicable restrictive covenants, your unvested RSUs will remain eligible to vest on the Vesting Schedule above] [if applicable; and


(B) In the event of your termination due to death or Disability (as defined in your Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement), and in the case of Disability, subject to the execution of a release agreement in favor of the Company and your continued compliance with any applicable restrictive covenants, your unvested RSUs will immediately vest.] [insert for applicable Executive Officer Award Agreements]


By accepting this award, the Grantee agrees that the RSUs are granted under and governed by this Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and by the provisions of the Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto. The Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions are incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan or in the Statement of Terms and Conditions, as applicable. 
 
The Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, the Statement of Terms and Conditions and the Plan Prospectus, represents that the Grantee has carefully read and is familiar with their provisions, and hereby accepts the RSUs subject to all of their terms and conditions. The Grantee acknowledges that there may be adverse tax consequences upon settlement of the RSUs or disposition of the shares, if any, received in connection therewith and that Grantee should consult a tax adviser prior to such settlement or disposition.
 
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF THE


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael Edelhart, the Chief Executive Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LiveDeal, Inc.





Date: February 17, 2009

/s/ Michael EdelhartMichael EdelhartChief Executive Officer








I, Rajeev Seshadri, the Chief Financial Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LiveDeal, Inc.





Date: February 17, 2009

/s/  Rajeev SeshadriRajeev SeshadriChief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Chesapeake Bay Activities 

#           Publications        

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

The USGS publishes peer-reviewed reports and journal articles which are used by Chesapeake Bay Program resource managers and policy makers to make science-based decisions for ecosystem conservation and restoration. Use the Search box below to find publications on selected topics.

If you wish to search by author, click the button below to be directed to USGS Publications Warehouse.

USGS Publications Warehouse

January 1, 1948

####                 Muskrat investigations on the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Maryland, 1941-1945              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

July 1, 1947

####                 Vegetation of the Patuxent Research Refuge, Maryland              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

January 1, 1947

####                 The distribution of Maryland birds              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

January 1, 1947

####                 [Book review] Preliminary List of the Birds of Maryland and the District of Columbia, compiled and annotated by Irving E. Hampe and Haven Kolb              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

January 1, 1947

####                 The distribution of Maryland birds              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

January 1, 1947

####                 Recent observations on Maryland birds              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

January 1, 1947

####                 Christmas bird counts - 1946. Southeastern Worcester County, Maryland              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

January 1, 1946

####                 Effects on forest birds of DDT used for gypsy moth control in Pennsylvania              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

January 1, 1940

####                 Flora of the Patuxent Research Refuge, Maryland              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Chesapeake Bay Activities

January 1, 1915

####                 Erosion and sedimentation in Chesapeake Bay around the mouth of Choptank River              

Chesapeake Bay Activities

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
- …
-                Page            67 
-                Page            68 
-                Page            69 
-                Page            70 
-                Page            71 
-                Page            72 
-                Page            73 
-                Page            74 
-                Current page            75
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40040 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DONALDO ARGELIO RINCON

- OCHOA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18

- CR

- 1559

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donaldo Argelio
Rincon

- Ochoa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rincon

- Ochoa h a s not f iled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 3, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40040 Document: 00515020429 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2019No. 19

- 40040

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40040 Document: 00515020429 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2019
#                                                                         U.S. 4th Fleet’s Maritime Synchronization Symposium: Focus on China and Scaling the Hybrid Fleet                                                                    

##### by USNAVSOUTH/4TH FLEET PUBLIC AFFAIRS

12 December 2023

                231205-N-OC941-3001Naval Station Mayport, Fla. – (Dec. 5, 2023) – Guest speakers and participants take part in the annual group photo commemorating U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command/U.S. 4th Fleet's annual Maritime Synchronization Symposium at Naval Station Mayport Dec. 5-8, 2023. This year's symposium featured four guest speakers, expert panels, and question and answer sessions for regional Foreign Area Officers (FAOs) to discuss mutual challenges and opportunities, get the latest information on strategy and upcoming operations and exercises, and learn more about the Navy's strategic competition with the People's Republic of China and U.S. 4th Fleet's campaign to inform the hybrid fleet. USNAVSO/FOURTHFLT is the trusted maritime partner for Caribbean, Central and South America maritime forces leading to improved unity, security and stability. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist John Fischer/Released)            

                231205-N-OC941-3001            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Chief Petty Officer John Fischer

VIRIN: 231205-N-OC941-3001
Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 15 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 15 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BARON
CAPITAL TRUST FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD FROM ITS INCEPTION (FEBRUARY
3, 1998) TO DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRITY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         243,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  245,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               489,431
<PP&E>                                       7,536,770
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,246,627)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,731,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          482,705
<BONDS>                                      4,414,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,357,101
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,523,009)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,731,515
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               396,884
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  606,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,241,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,450,850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,450,850)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.52)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Parts 1 and 301 
          - [REG-101739-00] 
          - RIN-1545-AX75 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed regulations relating to section 7701 that address the Federal tax classification of a business entity wholly owned by a foreign government and provide that a nonbank entity that is wholly owned by a foreign bank cannot be disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for purposes of applying the special rules of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to banks. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for May 16, 2001, at 10 a.m., is cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sonya M. Cruse of the Regulations Unit at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Friday, January 12, 2001, (66 FR 2854), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for May 16, 2001, at 10 a.m., in room 6718. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 7701 of the Internal Revenue Code. The public comment period for these regulations expired on April 25, 2001.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Friday, May 4, 2001, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for May 16, 2001, is cancelled. 

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization & Strategic Planning).

[FR Doc. 01-11842 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P