alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009292EN.01000401.xml

| 2.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 292/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 30.9.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 501/09 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | Freistaat Thüringen |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Änderung der Richtlinie über die Gewährung von Zuwendungen aus Mitteln des Europäischen Sozialfonds und/oder des Freistaats Thüringen zur Förderung von Personal in Forschung und Entwicklung |
| Legal basis | Richtlinie über die Gewährung von Zuwendungen aus Mitteln des Europäischen Sozialfonds und/oder des Freistaats Thüringen zur Förderung von Personal in Forschung und Entwicklung |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Research and development, Regional development, Innovation |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 6,4 million
  Overall budget: EUR 38 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | 1.9.2009-31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Thüringer Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Technologie und Arbeit |
| Max-Reger-Str. 4—8 |
| 99096 Erfurt |
| DEUTSCHLAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

30.9.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 501/09

Member State

Germany

Region

Freistaat Thüringen

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Änderung der Richtlinie über die Gewährung von Zuwendungen aus Mitteln des Europäischen Sozialfonds und/oder des Freistaats Thüringen zur Förderung von Personal in Forschung und Entwicklung

Legal basis

Richtlinie über die Gewährung von Zuwendungen aus Mitteln des Europäischen Sozialfonds und/oder des Freistaats Thüringen zur Förderung von Personal in Forschung und Entwicklung

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Research and development, Regional development, Innovation

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 6,4 million

Overall budget: EUR 38 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

1.9.2009-31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Thüringer Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Technologie und Arbeit

Max-Reger-Str. 4—8

99096 Erfurt

DEUTSCHLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. WI L L I AM S L AT T E R Y, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50457 D. C . No . 2 : 0 4 - c r - 0 0 9 5 0 - DD P ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D e a n D . P r e ge r s on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J ul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W i l l i a m S l a tt e ryappe a l s f r om the 24- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d upon r e voc a t i on of

s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a n dw e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED JU L 20 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50457 2 S la tte ryc o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o c e d u r a llye rr e db yf a ilin g to e x p la in a d e q u a te lyits r e a s o n s f o rth e r e v o c a tio n s e n te n c e . T h e r e c o r db e lie s h is c ont e nt i on. S l att ery nextcont ends thathi s s ent ence i s s ub st ant i vel y unrea sonabl e. In l i gh tof S l att ery’ s bre ac h o f trustand fai l ure t o b e det erre d, and the need t o p rot ec t th e p u b lic , th e s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . See 18 U . S . C . § 3 58 3(e) ; U ni ted States v . Si m tob , 485 F . 3d 1058, 1063 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( w he r e de f e nda nt vi ol at es supervi se d rel ea se by com m i tt i ng sam e off ense for w hi ch he w as pl ac ed on s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e , br e a c h of trus ti s m or e s i gni f

i c a nta nd “ gr e a t e rs a nc t i ons m aybe re qu i re d t o d et erfuture c ri m i nal ac t i vi ty” ). AF F I RME D.
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 35 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Med Gen, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report'), I, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul B. Kravitz
-------------------------------
Paul B. Kravitz,
Principal Executive Officer


February 17, 2003
HYNES & HOWES INSURANCE COUNSELORS, INC.
                            Comparative Balance Sheet
                           September 30, 1997 and 1996


                                                            September 30,
        Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity              1997            1996
Current Liabilities:
   Buyers Escrow                                 $     7,246     $    13,896
   Loans Payable                                           0          27,000
   Other Current Liability                               500               0

      Total Current Liabilities                  $     7,746     $    40,896

Long Term Liabilities:
   Mortgage Payable  (Note 7)                    $         0     $   991,555

      Total Long Term Liabilities                $         0     $   991,555

      Total Liabilities                          $     7,746     $ 1,032,451


Stockholders' Equity:
   Capital Stock, no par value, 100,000,000
      Shares Authorized, 11,260,675 shares
      Issued (Note 9)                            $ 3,780,765     $ 3,780,765
   Paid in Capital (Note 10)                             100             100
   Retained Earnings (Deficit)                    (3,087,380)     (3,082,995)
   Treasury Stock, at Cost                           (33,252)        (33,252)

      Total Stockholders' Equity                 $   660,233     $   664,618

      Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $   667,979     $ 1,697,069


Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 4, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00825-CV

CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS, Appellant

V.

CHRISTOPHER JONES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004-00540-2014

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Stoddart, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Before the Court is the City of Plano, Texas’s February 2, 2015 Unopposed Motion to 

Dismiss Appeal. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1).

140825F.P05

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS, Appellant

No. 05-14-00825-CV V.

CHRISTOPHER JONES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 4, Collin County, Texas,

Trial Court Cause No. 004-00540-2014.

Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore,

Justices Stoddart and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 4th day of February, 2015.
Clear All

        29 March 2024    

                    NIWC Atlantic Conducts Largest-Ever, All-Domain, Naval Integration Event                 
                CHARLESTON, S.C. — In its push to advance joint all-domain warfighting concepts across the command, Naval Information Warfare Center (NIWC) Atlantic wrapped up its largest-ever annual System of Systems Naval Integration Experiment (SoSNIE) event on March 22.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify that the foregoing Quarterly Report of
CLAIMSNET.COM INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2003 (the "Report"):

         (1)      Fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Don Crosbie
--------------------
Don Crosbie
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 28, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       18
Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05362-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        17 September 2023    

                    Immigrant Sailors celebrate citizenship during Constitution Week                 
                Sailors, with hope in their heart and papers in hand, confidently stride into an  office that holds the key to their future as an American citizen. Upon entering, they go through a lengthy and often stressful process that ultimately sees them transition from immigrant to citizen following their Oath            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0036 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0036

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (5100/2005 — COM(2004)0428 — C6-0027/2005 — 2004/0131(AVC)) **

*
Official Journal 304 E , 01/12/2005 P. 0182 - 0182 *

P6_TA(2005)0036

EC-Egypt Euro-Mediterranean Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (5100/2005 — COM(2004)0428 — C6-0027/2005 — 2004/0131(AVC))

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (5100/2005 — COM(2004)0428) [1],

- having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 310 and the second sentence of Article 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty (C6-0027/2005),

- having regard to Rules 43(1), 75 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6-0041/2005),

1. Gives its assent to the conclusion of the Protocol;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Arab Republic of Egypt.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
#### GOSS et al. v. VERZI et al.

(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Submitted January 3, 1923.

Decided June 4, 1923.)

No. 3865.

Appeal and error <§=>! 138—Refusal of injunction, after complainants were afforded complete remedy by appeal from rent commission, affirmed.

A decree dismissing a bill to enjoin the tenants and the rent commission from carrying out an order of the commission fixing rents for an apartment building will be affirmed, where the plaintiffs had been afforded a complete remedy at law by an appeal from the decision of the rent commission, in which they obtained the relief sought by the injunction.

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.

Bill in equity 'by Nannie E. Goss and another against Georgia M, Verzi and others. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

Affirmed.

e W. Gwynn Gardiner, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Chapin Brown, of Washington, D. C., for Rent Commission. George W. Offutt, Jr., C. V. Imlay, and J. N. Halper, all of Washington, D. C., for. appellees.

Before ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices, and SMITH, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.

i§^For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests *&*Indexes

VAN ORSDEE, Associate Justice.

This case involves the same property as in Smith Co. v. Verzi et al. (No. 3910) - App. D. C. -, 290 Fed. 338, this day decided on appeal from the rent commission of the District of Columbia.

Appellants, owners of the property in question, filed a bill in equity in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, seeking an injunction to restrain defendants and the rent commission from enforcing or attempting to enforce the order of the rent commission of April 22, 1922, from which the appeal in the above case was taken; and that defendants, tenants, and each of them be enjoined from paying rent at the reduced rate fixed by the rent commission in said order. From a decree sustaining a motion to dismiss the bill, this appeal was taken.

Inasmuch as the relief sought by injunction has been accorded plaintiffs on the appeal from the order of the rent commission, and since a complete and adequate remedy was furnished plaintiffs by appeal, further consideration of this case is unnecessary.

The decree is affirmed, with-costs.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief
Executive Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


              /s/ David G. Derrick
            --------------------------------------------
            David G. Derrick
            President and Chief Executive Officer
            Medizone International, Inc.

             /s/ Michael G. Acton
            ----------------------------------------------
            Michael G. Acton
            Chief Financial Officer



Dated: October 30, 2003
Clear All

        19 April 2022    

                    Navy Week returning to the Motor City                 
                MILLINGTON, Tenn. – The U.S. Navy is preparing to bring Navy Week back to Detroit, July 11-17, with 50 to 75 Sailors from across the fleet to take part in the service’s signature outreach program. Detroit Navy Week will give the community an opportunity to learn about the Navy, its people and its            

        19 April 2022    

                    Navy Week Program Set For Trenton Port Visit May 2-8                 
                MILLINGTON, Tenn. –  Trenton, New Jersey, will host the city's first in-person Navy Week since the creation of the Navy Week program when the Navy visits the area for a week of events May 2-8.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
i i i i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPI NIO N No
. 04
- 09 -0 01 33 -C R A n t h o n y F OST ER , Appellant
v . STA TE of

Te xas , Appellee F ro m th e 14 4th

Judic ia l D ist

ri c t Co ur t, B e xar County , T e xas Trial Court No. 2008-CR-6089 Honora ble Catherine T orre s-Stahl , J udg e Presiding PER CU RI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini , J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion , J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin , J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: April 8, 2009 DI SMI SSED The trial c ourt signe d a ce rtification of de fenda nt’s rig ht to appeal stating that this “is a plea barg ain ca se, and the defe ndant has NO rig ht of appe al.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a) (2). Rule 25.2(d) provides, “T he appe al must be dis missed if a certifica tion that shows the def endant ha s the rig ht of appea l has not been ma de par t of the re cord unde r these r ules.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5
. 2 ( d )
. A c c o r d i n g l y, on Mar ch 23 , 2 00 9, thi s c ou rt iss ue d a n o rd e r s ta tin g thi s a

pp e a l w ou ld b e dis mis se d p ur su a nt t o Rule 25.2(d) unless a

n amende d trial court c ertification that shows defenda nt has t he right of appeal04
- 09
- 00 13 3- CR

- 2- was made part of the appellate rec ord. See Da nie ls v . S tat e , 110 S.W .3d 174 (Tex. App.—San An ton io 2 00 3, or de r) ; T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1. On Marc h 24, 2009, defen d an t ’s appellate counse l filed a letter stating “ this court has no choice but to dismiss the appe al.” I n light of the rec ord pre sented, we ag ree with defe ndant’s counse l that Rule 25.2(d) re quires this court to dismiss t his appea l. Accor dingly , this appeal is dismissed. PER CU RI AM
DO NO T PU B L I SH
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 05, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 05, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0090. IN THE INTEREST OF H. P. et al., CHILDREN (FATHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

14416J126 14416J127 14416J128
Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05437-AKH Document 7 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05437-AKH Document 7 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 2