alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      10.1

    


    CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     

    We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-116232 of Prana Biotechnology Limited on Form F-3 of our report dated
      September 30, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Prana
      Biotechnology Limited for the year ended June 30, 2005. 

     

     

    /s/
      Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 

    DELOITTE
      TOUCHE TOHMATSU

     

    Melbourne,
      Victoria, Australia

    21
      December, 2005
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 52 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 52 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### Bobby Ray GRADY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WAYNE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6071.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Bobby Ray Grady, Appellant pro se.

*266Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Ray Grady seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and his petition for a writ of mandamus. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Grady has not made the requisite showing. We find further that the relief Grady seeks is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

d0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

143970(25)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143970

COA: 303330

Eaton CC: 05-020279-FC

EDMUND LOWELL FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 21, 2012 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
#### WAIN, Repondent, v. NATIONAL PARK BANK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by Judson A. Wain, as receiver, against the National Park Bank. L. F. Doyle, for appellant. W. F. Scott, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and with leave to renew application upon proper papers.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23687-23688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11658]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1071-000 and ER01-1071-001]


Badger Windpower, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 3, 2001.
    Badger Windpower, LLC (Badger) submitted for filing a rate schedule 
under which Badger will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions at market-based rates. Badger also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Badger requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Badger.
    On April 12, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates,

[[Page 23688]]

granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the 
following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Badger should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Badger is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Badger's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 14, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11658 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AMENDMENT

                                    TO

                                 RESTATED

                       CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                          AMBER RESOURCES COMPANY

         The undersigned, being the President and the Assistant
Secretary of Amber Resources Company, certify that the following
amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Amber Resources
Company was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law at a duly
called meeting-of the shareholders on September 8, 1989.

         (1)  Article IV of the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Amber Resources Company Is amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

                                ARTICLE IV

                               Capital Stock

         The Corporation shall have the authority to issue
30,000,000 shares of capital stock, divided into 5,000,000 shares
of Preferred Stock, each of which shall have a par value of $1.00
per share, and 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock, each of which
shall have a par value of $.0625 per share.

         The undersigned acknowledge that the above. constitutes
the acts and deeds of Amber Resources' Company and that the facts
set forth above are true.

       Dated this 18th day of September, 1989.

                              s/George M. Schneider
                              George M. Schneider, President

ATTEST:

s/Ardith J. Davis
Ardith J. Davis, Secretary
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         364,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,123,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    568,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,304,410
<PP&E>                                       3,676,511
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,263,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,739,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,990,587
<BONDS>                                        924,111
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           70,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       175,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,016,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,739,503
<SALES>                                      8,891,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        7,960,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,795,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (56,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (38,508)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,474)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Karim Karaman, certify that: 1.             I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Preem Holdings AB (publ); 2.             Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.             Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report; 4.             The
companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a)Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and (c)Disclosed in this report any change in
the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and 5.             The
companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:
  April 29, 2004By:
  /s/ Karim KaramanName:
  Karim KaramanTitle:
  President
Case 1:07-cv-05436-AKH     Document 2      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05436-AKH     Document 2      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 12 of 12
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1584 

To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. PERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Sovereignty 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 115 of the Clean Air Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 7415) is repealed. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

10 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

11 7410(a)(2)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘sections 126 

12 and 115 (relating to interstate and international pollution 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1584 IH

1 abatement)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 126 (relating to inter2 state pollution abatement)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
(85 South. 923)

#### SHEFFIELD IRON CORPORATION v. HAND.

(8 Div. 232.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 20, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Colbert County;

C. P. Almon, Judge. A. H. Carmichael, of Tuscumbia. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05316-AKH Document 46-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 36 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 36 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH Document 21 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH Document 21 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05372-AKH Document 21 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.1

                                                                 67 Federal Road
                                                           Building A, Suite 300
                                                                      Brookfield
                                                                        CT 06804
March 25, 2005

Via Email

Mr. Michael Millon
Macrocom Investors, LLC

Dear Michael:

This letter will confirm our understanding with respect to the Finance Agreement
between Macrocom Investors, LLC and NetFabric Corporation ("NetFabric") of July
22, 2004 ("Agreement") with respect to the shell company that you brought to us.

Specifically, under the terms of that agreement, it was agreed and understood
that Macrocom Investors, LLC or a company formed by you would either bring to
NetFabric a shell for purchase or purchase a shell and propose it to NetFabric
as a vehicle for merger or acquisition. In either event, the shell was subject
to acceptance by NetFabric after it conducted its own due diligence, and you
were to be compensated in post-closing stock of the shell company used for such
merger or acquisition.

As it happened, Littlehampton Investments, LLC, ("Littlehampton") a company
formed by you, purchased a controlling interest in Houston Operating Company
("HOC") and proposed HOC as the company for merger with NetFabric. We conducted
our due diligence, agreed to merge with HOC and proceeded to closing on December
9, 2004. At the time of the merger, Littlehampton had and retained 1,000,000
shares of post-closing stock of HOC as a result of its previous purchase of the
shell, which purchase NetFabric was not a party to, and you received no other
compensation for the providing the shell to NetFabric.

As a result, you have received all compensation due to you under the terms of
the Agreement for bringing the company, HOC, to NetFabric for purposes of the
merger transaction.

Please confirm your above understanding of the above by signing a copy of this
letter and returning an original to me for our files.

Sincerely,


Walter Carozza
CFO, Houston Operating Company and NetFabric Corporation

Understood and agreed to:


------------------------------
Michael Millon, for Macrocom Investors, LLC
and Littlehampton Investments, LLC
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-48475 on Form S-3 filed July 30, 1992, Registration Statement No. 33-52301 on
Form S-3 filed February 16, 1994 and Registration Statement No. 33-64697 on Form
S-3 filed December 1, 1995 of General American Transportation Corporation of our
report dated January 26, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of General American Transportation Corporation included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP




March 16, 1999
Chicago, Illinois
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify that the foregoing
Quarterly Report of CLAIMSNET.COM INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2005 (the Report):  (1)
    Fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    Fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and
consolidated results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
the Report. /s/ Laura M. BrayLaura M. BrayChief Financial OfficerApril 22, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to this Report pursuant to Item
601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, Unites States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of this Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Case 1:07-cv-01521-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-01521-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-01521-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-01521-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4