alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NFIRS Data Snapshot June 2022

Fire Department Overall Run Profile as 

Reported to the National Fire Incident 

Reporting System (2020)

Fire department runs by major incident type category (2020)

Percent of runs

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

Overpressure rupture/

explosion (no fire)

Severe weather/

natural disaster

Special incident type

Hazardous condition

 (no fire)

Fire

Service call

False alarm/false call

Good intent call

EMS/rescue 64.2

11.7

8.0

7.6

3.9

3.4

0.8

0.2

0.1

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Note: Total does not add up to 100% due to rounding.

I n 2 0 2 0 , f i r e d e p a r t m e n t s 

responded to 26,959,000 incident 

runs or calls as reported to the 

National Fire Incident Reporting 

System (NFIRS).

O f t h e r e p o r t e d r u n s , 

17,297,200 (64%) required 

emergency medical services 

(EMS) and rescue services.

EMS-designated calls were, by 

far, the leading specific type of 

fire department run within the 

EMS and rescue service calls 

category (68%), followed by 

medical assists (14%).

Specific types of fire department calls within the EMS and rescue service 

incident type category (2020)

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

All other EMS and rescue calls

Motor vehicle accident

 with no injuries

Motor vehicle accident

 with injuries

Medical assist

EMS call

Percent of EMS and rescue calls

67.8

13.9

4.8

3.5

9.9

Source: NFIRS 5.0.

Note: Total does not add up to 100% due to rounding.

For more information on fire department runs in 2020, view the full report “Fire Department Overall Run Profile as 

Reported to the National Fire Incident Reporting System (2020)” at https://www.usfa.fema.gov/data/statistics/reports/.

National Fire Data Center

16825 S. Seton Ave.

Emmitsburg, MD 21727

usfa.fema.gov
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

In accordance with the disclosure requirements of SFAS 128, a reconciliation of
the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted EPS is provided below.

             (Unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                 ------------------
Numerator - Basic and Diluted EPS:     September 30, 1999     September 30, 1998
                                       ------------------     ------------------
<S>                                    <C>                    <C>
       Net income                                 $ 3,422               $ 5,755

Denominator - Basic EPS:
       Common stock outstanding                    33,231                33,229

                                                  -------               -------
Basic earnings per share                          $  0.10               $  0.17
                                                  =======               =======
Denominator - Diluted EPS:
       Demoninator - basic EPS                     33,231                33,229
Effect of dilutive securities
       Common stock options                         1,184                 1,183
                                                  -------               -------

Diluted shares outstanding                         34,415                34,412

                                                  -------               -------
Diluted earnings per share                        $  0.10               $  0.17
                                                  =======               =======
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2064
BELL ATLANTIC-WASHINGTON, DC, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SYED H. (NAYYAR) ZAIDI, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Ale xandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-467-A) Submitted: November 26, 1997 Decided: December 15, 1997 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Syed H. Zaidi, Appellant Pro Se. Betty S. W. Graumlich, MCSWEENEY, BURTCH & CRUMP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from two district court orders denying various motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders appealed here are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. We therefore dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 63-5 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 63-5 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 16 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05779-RJH Document 16 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Neil Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and  d) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. As certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.     October 28, 2008/s/ Neil ChristiansenNeil ChristiansenChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
Pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)



I, Scott C. Harvard, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of Shore
Financial Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  (c) presented in this quarterly  report our conclusions  about
the  effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  (b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,   that  involves
management or other  employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's
internal controls; and

         6. The registrant's  other certifying  officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 13, 2002

                                                     /s/ Scott C. Harvard
                                                     President and CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7449

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARRYL ANTON HARRIS, a/k/a Chub,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:95-cr-00005-FDW-15)

Submitted: July 18, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Anton Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Anton Harris seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the 

order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Because the district court 

lacked the authority to consider Harris’s motion for 

reconsideration, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 

235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010), we 

affirm the district court’s order denying the motion. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*GEORGE BINNETTE

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 491 (AC 24107), is denied.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*903
      *Suzanne Zitser*and *Lisa Samuelson,*assistant public defenders, in support of the petition.

*Sarah Hanna,*special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided February 10, 2005
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 15.1  LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Hypercom Corporation

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-40457, 333-40459, 333-40461, 333-40333 and
333-43622) of our report dated November 10, 2000 relating to the unaudited
condensed consolidated interim Financial Statements of Hypercom Corporation that
are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.

                                                            Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
November 20, 2000

                                       25
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 23 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 23 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7093

ANDRE SYLVESTER WATTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden; RODNEY MYERS, Unit

Manager of Building I; MS. WILLIS, Case

Manager; STRICKLAND, Assistant Warden; KIM

WHITE, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.

(7:06-cv-00269-gec)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Sylvester Watts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM

Andre Sylvester Watts appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his Bivens* complaint without prejudice for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies and denying his motion filed under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The district court properly required

exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)

(2000). Because Watts did not fully exhaust his administrative

remedies, we find no error in the court’s dismissal of the action

without prejudice. Id. Nor did the district court abuse its

discretion in denying Watts’ Rule 59(e) motion. See Pacific Ins.

Co. v. American Nat’l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 402 (4th Cir.

1998) (providing standard). We therefore affirm the district

court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#           2 Paper Models Showing the Effects of Glacial Ice on a Mountain Valley      

                            - How to construct two paper models showing the effects of glacial ice on a mountain valley  (265 KB)
VICTORIA FULLER,

Plaintiff,

-againstINTERVIEW, INC.; BRANT

PUBLICATIONS, INC., as the owner of

Interview, Inc.; PETER BRANT, 

individually and as the shareholder and

owner of Brant Publications, Inc.;

SANDRA J. BRANT, individually and as

the shareholder and owner of Brant

Publications, Inc.; and DEBORAH

BLASUCCI, individually and as the

Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer of Interview, Inc. and

Brant Publications, Inc., 

Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

 NOTICE OF MOTION 

TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Civ.Action No. 07 CV 5728 (RJS/DCF)

 

Hon. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman

PLEASETAKE NOTICE, that upon the annexed Memorandum of Law of ALAN J. RICH,

ESQ., dated July 20, 2010, the Declaration of Alan J. Rich, Esq., dated July 20, 2010, Declaration

of Plaintiff, Victoria Fuller, dated February 11, 2009, the original Complaint in this action, the

Second Proposed Amended Complaint and the other exhibits annexed and filed hereto and

incorporated by reference hereto, Plaintiff will move this Court before the Honorable Magistrate

Judge Debra Freeman, at Courtroom: 17A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007 at such

time as this Court shall hear, for an Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 (a) (2),

permitting the amendment of the Complaint in this action as per the Second Proposed Amended

Complaint; and for such other relief as to this Court seems just and proper.

// // //

// // //

// // //

Case 1:07-cv-05728-RJS-DCF Document 55-2 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
Dated: Brooklyn, New York 

July 20,20 10 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

26 Court Street, Suite 1801 

Brooklyn, New York 1 1242 

Tel: (2 12) 92 1-2244 

ARich@Richlaw.US 

Case 1:07-cv-05728-RJS-DCF Document 55-2 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2
#### FINLAY et al. v. LEARY.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

June 18, 1894.)

Action by James Finlay and another against John J. Leary.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with cosis.
Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 13
## Breadcrumb

-  about 

#           Documents      

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

This is a collection of supporting documents to include instructions, training materials, technical memos, flowcharts, analytical references, and more. 

Official USGS Publications

**File icon

May 9, 2024

####   Landsat 7 Data Users Handbook

**File icon

April 25, 2024

####   USGS Aggregates Time Series Data by State, Type, and End Use

**File icon

April 1, 2024

####   Temporary Recruitment Bulletin - Hydrologic Field Assistant

**File icon

March 26, 2024

####   TM24-01 Removal of ‘d’ (sample was diluted) value-qualifier code reported for 1,824 results for dissolved solids released between April 17, 2020, and July 28, 2020.

**File icon

March 25, 2024

####   Update for the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference from the USGS National Wildlife Health Center - March 2024

**File icon

March 25, 2024

####   Iowa Water Use Data and Research (WUDR) Workplan

**File icon

March 8, 2024

####   JACIE 2024 Workshop Agenda

**File icon

February 26, 2024

####   Chromium - Historical Statistics (Data Series 140)

**File icon

February 13, 2024

####   Grover Coloring Page

**File icon

February 7, 2024

####   EROS Science Processing Architecture On Demand Interface User Guide

**File icon

February 1, 2024

####   Pecora 2024 Award Call for Nominations

**File icon

January 25, 2024

####   April Seminar Series

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
-                Page            6 
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Page            9 
- ...
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

New England Business Service, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-38925, 33-56227, 333-44825, 333-44819, 333-43028 and 333-43804 of
New England Business Service, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos.
333-57657 and 333-87447 of New England Business Service, Inc. on Form S-3 of our
report dated July 25, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of New
England Business Service, Inc. for the year ended June 24, 2000.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 1, 2000