alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-2962

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jaime Jacquez Moran

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport

____________

 Submitted: March 27, 2017

Filed: March 30, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

After Jaime Moran pleaded guilty to a marijuana conspiracy offense, the

district court sentenced him to 144 months in prison, in accordance with the parties’

1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the

1

Southern District ofIowa, adopting the report and recommendations ofthe Honorable
joint sentencing stipulation and recommendation. On appeal, newly appointed

counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). For the

reasons explained below, we affirm.

Counsel argues that Moran’s guilty plea is not voluntary, because trial counsel

failed to challenge the credibility of the government’s informant and to suppress the

informant’s incriminating statements. Counsel also argues that trial counsel was

ineffective for entering into the jointstipulation and recommendation for a 144-month

sentence. Neither of these argumentsis properly before us. First, Moran did not seek

below to withdraw his guilty plea; and second, both of his arguments are based on

ineffective assistance of counsel, which we decline to address in this direct criminal

appeal. See United States v. Umanzor, 617 F.3d 1053, 1060-61 (8th Cir. 2010)

(where defendant did not move to withdraw guilty plea in district court, he could not

challenge voluntariness of plea for first time on direct appeal, and any claim that plea

was involuntary needed to be addressed in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings where

factual record could be further developed); United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449

F.3d 824, 826-27 (8th Cir. 2006) (ineffective-assistance claims are usually best

litigated in collateral proceedings; this court will consider such claims on direct

appeal only where record is fully developed, where not to act would amount to plain

miscarriage of justice, or where counsel’s error is readily apparent).

Finally, having reviewed the record independently as required under Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The

judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

Stephen B. Jackson, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of

Iowa.

-2-
Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 15-2 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 157 

To repeal the provisions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 

Act prohibiting the bringing of qualified civil liability actions in Federal 

or State court. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. EVANS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the provisions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act prohibiting the bringing of qualified 

civil liability actions in Federal or State court. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Manufacturers 

5 Accountability Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 157 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON BRINGING QUALIFIED 

2 CIVIL LIABILITY ACTIONS IN FEDERAL OR 

3 STATE COURT. 

4 Sections 2 through 4 of the Protection of Lawful 

5 Commerce in Arms Act (15 U.S.C. 7901–7903; Public 

6 Law 109–92) are hereby repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Thornton Donaldson, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Texola Energy
      Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Texola Energy Corporation.                                                                

Dated: April 18, 2007

/s/ Thornton DonaldsonThornton Donaldson President,
Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Texola Energy
Corporation and will be retained by Texola Energy Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Clear All

        29 August 2022    

                    EODTEU Two Holds Change of Command Ceremony                 
                 Explosive Ordnance Disposal Training and Evaluation Unit (EODTEU) 2 welcomed its newest leader during a change of command ceremony at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek- Fort Story, Aug. 25.Cmdr. Paul Mahoney relieved Cmdr. Douglas Alley as commander, EODTEU 2 in front of family, friends            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# C_2010018EN.01004701.xml

| 23.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/47

---

Corrigendum to the Commission Communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 323 of 31 December 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 323 of 31 December 2009

2010/C 18/16

On page 24, footnote (ii) of the table:

for:

| ‘(ii) | http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/fmtp_spec.html’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(ii)

http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/fmtp_spec.html’,

read:

| ‘(ii) | http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/amhs_spec.html’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(ii)

ii

http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/amhs_spec.html’.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2019

No. 04-19-00570-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

Olga HURON and Dianna Rico,

Appellees

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV05317

Honorable J Frank Davis, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ brief was due on November 21, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). To date, 

no Appellees’ brief or motion for extension of time has been filed. 

If Appellees wish to file a brief in this appeal, Appellees are hereby ORDERED to file 

within TEN DAYS of the date of this order (1) Appellees’ brief and (2) a reasonable explanation

for failing to timely file the brief. See id. R. 38.6(d). If Appellees wish the response to serve as a 

motion for extension of time, the response must comply with Rule 10.5(b)(1) of the Texas Rules 

of Appellate Procedure and the Fourth Court of Appeals’ local rules. See id. R. 10.5(b)(1); 4TH 

TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. RS., http://www.txcourts.gov/4thcoa/practice-before-the-court/

local-rules.aspx.

If Appellees fail to file an adequate response within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, 

the appeal will be set for submission without Appellees’ brief. See Jackson v. Tex. Bd. of 

Pardons & Paroles, No. 01-03-00862-CV, 2008 WL 921035, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] Apr. 3, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“‘In a civil case, the court will accept as true the 

facts stated [in Appellant’s brief] unless another party contradicts them.’” (alteration in original) 

(quoting TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(g))). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.33-59497, 333-08139, and 333-164054 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated March 16,2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc. and subsidiaries and theeffectiveness of Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc. and subsidiaries’internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverseopinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financialreporting because of a material weakness), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31,2009.

 
| /s/   Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   |
| Salt  Lake City, Utah                     |   |
| March 16,  2010                      |   |

 

----
# C_2009174EN.01001701.xml

| 28.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/17

---

Corrigendum to the Commission communication concerning the prolongation of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 157 of 10 July 2009
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 157 of 10 July 2009

2009/C 174/09

The text of the Commission communication published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 157 of 10 July 2009, p. 1, should be considered as null and void since an identical text has already been published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 156 of 9 July 2009, p. 3.

Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 32 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 160 

To prohibit a single bill or joint resolution presented by Congress to the 

President from containing multiple subjects and to require the equal 

application of laws to Members of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Mr. GALLAGHER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit a single bill or joint resolution presented by 

Congress to the President from containing multiple subjects and to require the equal application of laws to 

Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizen Legislature 

5 Anti-Corruption Reform of Congress Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘CLEAN Congress Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 160 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MULTIPLE SUBJECTS IN SINGLE 

2 BILL. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Each bill, order, resolution, or 

4 vote submitted by Congress to the President under section 

5 7 of article I of the Constitution of the United States shall 

6 embrace no more than one subject, and that subject shall 

7 be clearly and descriptively expressed in the title of the 

8 bill, order, resolution or vote. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply 

10 with respect to the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress and 

11 each succeeding Congress. 

12 SEC. 3. REQUIRING EQUAL APPLICATION OF LAWS TO MEM13 BERS OF CONGRESS. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi15 sion of law, any provision of law that provides an exception 

16 in its application to a Member of Congress or an employee 

17 of the office of a Member of Congress shall have no effect. 

18 (b) CLARIFICATION RELATING TO EXERCISE OF OF19 FICIAL OR REPRESENTATIONAL DUTIES.—Subsection (a) 

20 shall not be construed to apply to provisions of law or rules 

21 which permit Members of Congress or employees of offices 

22 of Members of Congress to carry out official duties that 

23 are tied directly to lawmaking, including provisions or 

24 rules permitting Members and employees to enter and use 

25 the United States Capitol, the United States Capitol 

26 grounds, and other buildings and facilities. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 160 IH

1 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Member 

2 of Congress’’ means a Senator or a Representative in, or 

3 Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7665

JAMES GATEWOOD BLAKELY, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-6294

JAMES GATEWOOD BLAKELY, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (4:07-cv-02012-MBS)

Submitted: April 24, 2009 Decided: May 14, 2009

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Gatewood Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM: James Gatewood Blakely seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Blakely has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3039106-MAR-201309:41 AM
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6512** 

GEORGE FREDERICK DELANEY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv — 00447

- CMH

- IDD )

Submitted : September 9 , 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. George Frederick Delaney, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding preced ent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Frederick Delaney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabil ity. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Delaney has not made the requ isite showing. Accordingly, we grant Delaney’s motion to file an amended informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to pro ceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 43 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 43 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 43 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

M2K, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

TRX RESIDENTIAL, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1262

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE6-014891.

Rodrigo S. Da Silva of Law Offices of Rodrigo S. Da Silva, P.A., Miami, 

for appellant.

C. Cory Mauro of Mauro Law, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Clear All

        31 March 2024    

                    NAS Sigonella Welcomes First MQ-4C Triton                  
                The first MQ-4C Triton arrived to Naval Air Station (NAS) Sigonella, March 30, 2024.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Clear All

        03 April 2023    

                    Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group Completes COMPTUEX                 
                The Sailors, ships, squadrons and staffs of the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group (GRFCSG) successfully completed composite training unit exercise (COMPTUEX), April 2, 2023.            

        13 August 2022    

                    U.S. Second Fleet commander commemorates aircraft carrier centennial aboard USS Hornet                 
                Commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet, Vice Adm. Daniel Dwyer, spoke at the Centennial of the Aircraft Carrier ceremony aboard the USS Hornet Sea, Air and Space Museum, Aug. 13.            

        16 June 2022    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet Commander Embarks George H.W. Bush during COMPTUEX                 
                ATLANTIC OCEAN - Vice Adm. Daniel Dwyer, commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet and Joint Force Command Norfolk, embarked the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), June 8-10.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF THE


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kevin A. Hall, the Chief Operating
Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of LiveDeal, Inc.





Date:
      May 14, 2010
              /s/ Kevin A.
      HallKevin
      A. HallChief
      Operating Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





I, Lawrence W. Tomsic, the Chief
Financial Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of LiveDeal, Inc.





Date:
      May 14, 2010
              /s/  Lawrence W.
      TomsicLawrence
      W. TomsicChief
      Financial Officer
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-6 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-6 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-6 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 3 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-6 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 4 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-6 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 5 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-6 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 6 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-6 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 7 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-6 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 8 of 8