alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009158EN.01000901.xml

| 11.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/9

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 158/04

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Bolzano — Roma Fiumicino and viceversa |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 December 2009 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | E.N.A.C. Ente nazionale dell’aviazione civile
  Direzione centrale regolazione economica





  Direzione trasporto aereo |
| Viale del Castro Pretorio, n. 118 |
| 00185 Roma |
| ITALIA |
| www.enac-italia.it |
| E-mail: trasporto.aereo@enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Concerned route

Bolzano — Roma Fiumicino and viceversa

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 December 2009

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

E.N.A.C. Ente nazionale dell’aviazione civile

Direzione centrale regolazione economica

Direzione trasporto aereo

Viale del Castro Pretorio, n. 118

00185 Roma

ITALIA

www.enac-italia.it

E-mail: trasporto.aereo@enac.gov.it

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23162-23163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-01-035]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Brooks Memorial (S.E. 17th 
Street) Bridge Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Ft. Lauderdale, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Brooks Memorial (S.E. 17th Street) bridge across the Atlantic 
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 1065.9, Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, 
Florida. This deviation allows the drawbridge owner or operator to not 
open the bridge from April 30 to May 9, 2001 with scheduled single leaf 
openings on May 5 and 6, 2001. This temporary deviation is required to 
allow the bridge owner to safely conduct repairs to the drawbridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from April 30 to May 9, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Project Officer, Seventh Coast Guard 
District, Bridge Branch at (305) 415-6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Brooks Memorial (S.E. 17th Street) 
bridge across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Ft. Lauderdale, 
Florida, has a horizontal clearance of 48 feet between the fender and 
the bridge span. On April 5, 2001, the Florida Department of 
Transportation, requested a deviation from the current operating 
regulation in 33 CFR 117.261(hh) which requires the drawbridge to open 
on signal; except that from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. the draw need open only on 
the hour and half-hour. This temporary deviation was requested to allow 
emergency repairs to the drawbridge.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.261 (hh) for the purpose of 
conducting repairs to the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Brooks 
Memorial (Southeast 17th Street) drawbridge need not open for 
navigation from 6 a.m. on April 30, to 6 a.m. on May 9, 2001, except 
that the drawbridge will open on the hour from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. on May 
5 and 6, 2001. The deviation is effective until May 9, 2001.


[[Page 23163]]


    Dated: April 27, 2001.
Greg E. Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 01-11496 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
----

----

**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   |  /s/                David G.                Derrick                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David                G. Derrick                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | RemoteMDx,                Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | /s/                Michael G.                Acton                                   |
|   | Michael                G. Acton                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                           |

----
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

714 

KA 09-01085 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CRAIG D. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY F. DUGUAY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (ERIN TUBBS OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David

D. Egan, J.), rendered March 5, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in

the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree

and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of,

inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree

(Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the

third degree (§ 265.02 [1]). Viewing the evidence in light of the

elements of the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the

second and third degrees as charged to the jury (see People v

Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not

against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley,

69 NY2d 490, 495). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the jury was

entitled to find defendant guilty of both crimes beyond a reasonable

doubt based upon the credible evidence concerning the operability of

the .32 caliber pistol at the time of his possession (see People v

Cavines, 70 NY2d 882, 883; People v Velez, 278 AD2d 53, 53, lv denied

96 NY2d 808; People v Francis, 126 AD2d 740, 740). The testimony of

the police officer that, immediately after recovering the pistol, he

released the slide to empty the round of ammunition from the pistol’s

chamber, combined with the expert testimony of the firearms examiner,

established that, although the slide mechanism was sticking at the

time of the examination, at the time the firearm was recovered it was

loaded and it would have discharged during test firing had it not been

unloaded based on the ease with which the trigger and hammer moved. 

Furthermore, the firearms examiner successfully discharged the pistol

with ammunition recovered with the pistol after releasing the slide.
-2- 714 

KA 09-01085 

Defendant further contends that the verdict is against the weight

of the evidence with respect to those crimes on the issue of his

knowledge of the operability of the pistol. Contrary to defendant’s

contention, however, the People were not required to establish that he

was aware of the operability of the pistol (see People v Cooper, 59

AD3d 1052, 1053, lv denied 12 NY3d 852; People v Ansare, 96 AD2d 96,

97-98, lv denied 61 NY2d 672).

Entered: June 7, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
[Exhibit 31.2]





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a)/RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Jack Chien, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Med Gen, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to

the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

[Not applicable]



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





---

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  August 8, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|Med Gen, Inc.          
|(Registrant)           
|                       
|By: /s/ Jack Chien     
|Jack Chien             
|Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009099EN.01001301.xml

| 30.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/13

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

2009/C 99/11

The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to extract hydrocarbons in an area in the province of Friesland, where the line between 3 and 4 coincides with the western boundary of the Gorredijk extraction authorisation.

The coordinates of the area in question are as follows:

| | X | Y |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Point 1 | 174 450,00 | 559 650,00 |
| Point 2 | 179 900,00 | 560 750,00 |
| Point 3 | 183 450,00 | 561 231,79 |
| Point 4 | 172 746,50 | 545 447,70 |
| Point 5 | 167 525,00 | 550 570,00 |

X

Y

Point 1

174 450,00

559 650,00

Point 2

179 900,00

560 750,00

Point 3

183 450,00

561 231,79

Point 4

172 746,50

545 447,70

Point 5

167 525,00

550 570,00

The coordinates are expressed in accordance with the national triangulation system (Rijksdriehoeksmeting).

The area in respect of which the application is made has a surface area of 104,6 km2.

2

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to extract hydrocarbons in the area in question.

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| The Minister for Economic Affairs |
| --- |
| For the attention of: |
| J.C. De Groot |
| Director for the Energy Market |
| ALP/562 |
| Postbus 20101 |
| 2500 EC The Hague |
| NEDERLAND |

The Minister for Economic Affairs

For the attention of:

J.C. De Groot

Director for the Energy Market

ALP/562

Postbus 20101

2500 EC The Hague

NEDERLAND

Applications received after this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained from the following telephone number: +31 703797382 (contact person: P.C. de Regt).

---
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-105623, 333-86268,
333-74076, 333-41090, and 333-136182 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No.
333-142362 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 5, 2010, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Newport
Corporation (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph regarding the retrospective adjustment to the consolidated
financial statements for the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification
Subtopic 470-20, Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options, in 2009), and the
effectiveness of Newport Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Newport Corporation
for the year ended January 2, 2010.




/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP




Costa Mesa,
CaliforniaMarch 5, 2010




---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

In accordance with the disclosure requirements of SFAS 128, a reconciliation of
the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted EPS is provided below.

             (Unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended
                                         -----------------------------------
Numerator - Basic and Diluted EPS:       March 31, 2000       March 31, 1999
                                         --------------       --------------
<S>                                      <C>                  <C>
       Net loss                            $  3,874             $  3,666
Denominator - Basic EPS:
       Common stock outstanding              33,959               33,098
                                           --------             --------
Basic loss per share                       $  (0.11)            $  (0.11)
                                           ========             ========
Denominator - Diluted EPS:
       Demoninator - basic EPS               33,959               33,098
Effect of dilutive securities
       Common stock options                    --                   --
                                           --------             --------
Diluted shares outstanding                   33,959               33,098
                                           --------             --------
Diluted loss per share                     $  (0.11)            $  (0.11)
                                           ========             ========
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission 

Pursuant To The Government In the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b].

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

10:30 a.m., Wednesday, January 17, 2001.

# PLACE:

U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

# STATUS:

Closed—Meeting.

# MATTERS CONSIDERED:

The following matter will be considered during the closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:

Appeals to the Commission involving approximately one case decided by the National Commissioners pursuant to a reference under 28 CFR 2.27. This case was originally heard by an examiner panel wherein inmates of Federal prisons have applied for parole and are contesting revocation of parole or mandatory release.

# AGENCY CONTACT:

Sam Robertson, Case Operations, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5962.

Dated January 9, 2001.

Michael A. Stover,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-1161 Filed 1-10-01; 11:08 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 28 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 28 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse, May 16, 2001, 1 p.m. to May 17, 2001, 4:30 p.m., Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD, 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 5, 2001, Volume 66 FR 18103.                

The time of the meeting for the open session has been changed to 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on May 17, 2001. The time of the closed session will remain the same, from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on May 16, 2001. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: May 1, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-11596 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 10 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 10 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 10 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05366-AKH Document 10 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### WHITNEY et al., Appellants, v. DAVIS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Edmund C. Whitney and August Beck, as sheriff, etc., against Joseph Davis and others.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed on the merits, with costs. See 22 N. Y. Supp. 1122, mem.