alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141761) and Amendment No. 381 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2019,
      with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in
      a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 20, 2019
1

COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY

OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

____________

C.C.D. No. 19-03

____________

IN RE: COMPLAINTS UNDER THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY ACT

____________

PROCEEDING IN REVIEW OF THE ORDER

OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

J.C. Nos. CL-18-90172, 174

____________

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

____________

(Filed January March 31, 2020) 

Present: Judges Anthony J. Scirica, Chair, Sarah Evans Barker, Joel F. Dubina, Joel 

M. Flaum, Thomas F. Hogan, James E. Gritzner, and Jon O. Newman.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

This matter is before the Judicial Conduct and Disability Committee on a petition for 

review filed by a judge who was the subject of two complaints under the Judicial Conduct and 

Disability Act of 1980 (“Act”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 351–64, and the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and 

Judicial-Disability Proceedings (“JC&D Rules”). The Subject Judge seeks review of a May 2, 

2019, order of the Judicial Council of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, concluding judicial 

misconduct proceedings based on the judge’s retirement.

The Judicial Conduct and Disability Committee reviews this petition for review under 28 

U.S.C. § 357 and JC&D Rules 21(a) and 21(b)(1)(A). For the reasons we explain, we deny this 

petition for review and affirm the Judicial Council’s order.
2

In the fall of 2018, the court received reports alleging that the Subject Judge engaged in 

judicial misconduct. The Acting Chief Judge referred the complaints to a Special Committee for 

investigation. 28 U.S.C. § 353(c); JC&D R. 11(f). In the spring of 2019, the Subject Judge retired, 

permanently and irrevocably relinquishing their judicial office, under 28 U.S.C. § 178(j)(4)(A). 

The Special Committee forwarded the matter to the Judicial Council recommending that 

the Judicial Council conclude the complaints because the Subject Judge’s retirement was an 

“intervening event[ that] made the proceeding unnecessary.” JC&D R. 20(b)(1)(B). The Judicial 

Council agreed. According to the Council, “[w]here a former judge has fully resigned [their] 

judicial office, and can no longer perform any judicial duties, that former judge does not fall within 

the scope of persons who can be investigated under the Act.” In concluding the proceedings, the 

Judicial Council did not reach the merits of the complaints.

In a petition for review, the Subject Judge argues that the Acting Chief Judge abused their 

discretion in making various procedural determinations during the course of the proceeding.

Because the Judicial Council did not reach the merits of the complaints, but rather concluded the 

complaints based on the Subject Judge’s retirement, we need not address these arguments. The 

Judicial Council’s conclusion of the complaints based on the Subject Judge’s retirement was 

warranted and proper. See JC&D R. 21(a) (providing that review by the Judicial Conduct and 

Disability Committee of circuit judicial council orders is for errors of law, clear errors of fact, or 

abuse of discretion). We deny the Subject Judge’s petition for review and affirm the Circuit 

Judicial Council’s order.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

A NIBAL GABRIEL CIFFONI
,

Appellant /Cross Appellee

,

v.

DANIELLA MEJIA
, Appellee /Cross Appellant

.

No s

. 4D 2 2

- 717 and 4D22

- 802

[ July 6, 2023 ]

Consolidated appeal and cross

- appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; George Odom, Jr., Judge;

L.T. Case No. FMCE20

- 009839.

Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant/cross appellee.

Terrence P. O’Connor of Morgan, Carratt & O’Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee/cross appellant.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., F ORST a nd A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Winston Johnson, Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





Date: June
      28, 2006








/s/
      Winston Johnson


Winston
      Johnson


Chief
      Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 99.1
                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

          In  connection  with this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of United
     Tennessee  Bankshares,  Inc. I,  Richard G.  Harwood,  President  and Chief
     Executive Officer of United Tennessee Bankshares,  Inc., certify,  pursuant
     to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

2.   The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

3.   The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of United
     Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.

                                                  /s/ Richard G. Harwood
Date: November 13, 2002                           ------------------------------
                                                  Richard G. Harwood
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Orlando Lugo, Also Known as Antonio Sanchez, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), rendered March 6, 1981, convicting him of murder in the second degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2), by permission, from (a) an order of the same court, dated October 10, 1984, which, after a hearing, *762denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction on the ground, *inter alia,*of the alleged withholding of *Brady*material, and (b) an order of the same court, dated February 13, 1987, which denied, without a hearing, his second motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction on the ground of the alleged withholding of *Rosario*material.

Ordered that the order dated February 13, 1987, is reversed, on the law and the facts, the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction is granted, and a new trial is ordered. The appeals from the judgment and from the order dated October 10, 1984, are dismissed as academic.

The prosecution’s violation of the *Rosario*rule *(see, People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286, *cert denied*368 US 866; CPL 240.45) requires reversal of the defendant’s conviction *(see, People v Cardona,*138 AD2d 617).

In view of our determination, we do not address the defendant’s remaining contentions. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR01-1-000]


Associated Natural Gas Company; Notice of Offer of Settlement

May 2, 2001.
    Take notice that on April 18, 2001, Associated Natural Gas Company 
(ANG) tendered for filing a Stipulation and Agreement in the above 
referenced proceeding. The proposed Settlement established a firm 
reservation charge of $1.04146 per MMBtu, a maximum usage charge of 
$0.00273 per MMBtu and a maximum interruptible transportation rate of 
$0.03697 per MMBtu., effective November 1, 2000.
    The Settlement also provides that ANG shall file on or before 
November 1, 2003 either (1) a new petition for rate approval under 
Section 284.123(b)(2) or (2) a cost-and revenue study that complies 
with Section 154.313 of the Commission's regulations.
    Initial comments on ANG's filing are due on or before May 8, 2001 
and reply comments are due on or before May 18, 2001. Comments, 
protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet 
in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11487 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2009276EN.01002101.xml

| 17.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/21

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

2009/C 276/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25.8.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | NN 25/06 (ex N 191/06) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | Ain |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aide aux éleveurs de volailles du département de l’Ain |
| Legal basis | — | Articles L 221-1 et suivants du Code rural; |

Date of adoption of the decision

25.8.2009

Reference number of State Aid

NN 25/06 (ex N 191/06)

Member State

France

Region

Ain

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aide aux éleveurs de volailles du département de l’Ain

Legal basis

—

Articles L 221-1 et suivants du Code rural;

| — | Arrêté préfet de l’Ain du 2 mars 2006 |
| --- | --- |

—

Arrêté préfet de l’Ain du 2 mars 2006

| — | Commission Decision of 17 February 2006 (OJ L 48, 18.2.2006) concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community |
| --- | --- |

—

Commission Decision of 17 February 2006 (OJ L 48, 18.2.2006) concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community

| — | Commission Decision of 22 February 2006 (OJ L 52, 23.2.2006) concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community |
| --- | --- |

—

Commission Decision of 22 February 2006 (OJ L 52, 23.2.2006) concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the Community

| — | Les arrêtés interministériels du 24 octobre 2005 (paru au JORF du 25.10.2005) et des 18, 23 et 24 février 2006 (parus aux JORF des 19 et 25.2.2006). |
| --- | --- |

—

Les arrêtés interministériels du 24 octobre 2005 (paru au JORF du 25.10.2005) et des 18, 23 et 24 février 2006 (parus aux JORF des 19 et 25.2.2006).

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Aid to combat animal diseases

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

EUR 1,63 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

2006

Economic sectors

Agriculture

Name and address of the granting authority

| M. le Préfet de l'Ain |
| --- |
| Préfecture |
| 45 avenue Alsace-Lorraine |
| 01000 Bourg-en-Bresse |
| FRANCE |

M. le Préfet de l'Ain

Préfecture

45 avenue Alsace-Lorraine

01000 Bourg-en-Bresse

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) by Texola Energy Corporation (the Registrant), and the undersigned hereby certifies that:

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                                                        
|    
|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.
|    



| |       |                                                                             
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:   | /s/ Rhonda Stevenson                                                        
| |       | Rhonda Stevenson                                                            
| |       | Chief Executive Officer                                                     
| |       | and Chief Financial Officer                                                 
| |       | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| |       |                                                                             
| | Date: | April 14, 2009                                                              











A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Texola Energy Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Lazare Kaplan International Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Leon Tempelsman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                October 20, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Leon
                TempelsmanLeon
                TempelsmanPresident
                and
                Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05433-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05433-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

Contact:  Jeffrey J. Hattara                             (NYSE-BMC)
          (612)851-6030                                  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                       BMC ANNOUNCES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND

March 18, 1998 --Minneapolis, Minnesota - BMC Industries, Inc. today announced
that its Board of Directors has approved a continuation of its quarterly cash
dividend of $.015 per share.

Shareholders of record as of March 30, 1998 will receive a dividend of $.015 for
each share owned on that date, to be paid on April 13, 1998.

BMC Industries, Inc. is one of the world's largest manufacturers of aperture
masks for color picture tubes used in televisions and computer monitors.  The
Company is also a leading producer of polycarbonate, glass and plastic eyewear
lenses.  BMC's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol BMC.


                                        -30-
#### MACKAY TELEGRAPH-CABLE CO. v. CITY OF PARIS.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 8, 1913.)

No. 2535.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas; Gordon Russell, Judge. Suit in equity by the Mackay Telegraph-Cable Com-against the City of Paris. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals.

Affirmed.

Caswell T. Coffman and J. C. Marshall, both of Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.

Edgar Wright, of Paris, Tex., for appellee.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and CALL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The issues in this case are so largely controlled by the opinion of the Supreme Court in Western Union Telegraph Company v. Richmond, 224 U. S. 160, 32 Sup. Ct. 449, 56 L. Ed. 710, that on its authority the decree appealed from is affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF M.I.J.,

A CHILD

 

 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00036-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2021DCM372)

O R D E R

In order to protect the identity of the minor child who is the subject of this appeal, the Court 

has determined on its own motion that it is necessary to identify the child by her initials, M.I.J., 

and the parents by initials as well, in all papers submitted to the Court, including letters, motions, 

and briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 9.8. The Court will also refer to the child and parents by their initials 

in correspondence, orders, and in its opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of January, 2023.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 1 , 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00634

- CV

MARATHON PETROLEUM C OMPANY LP , Appellant

V.

CHERRY MOVING COMPAN Y, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15

- CV

- 1324

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed July 15, 2016 . No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On September 14, 2016 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the

cour t’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within2

fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this c ourt with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Christopher.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM *10-K MARCH
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,809
<INVENTORY>                                     17,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          11,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,642
<OTHER-SE>                                         409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,448
<SALES>                                         85,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,650
<CGS>                                           68,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,946
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                       433
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    127
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       845
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET DUE TO THE NATURE OF ITS
INDUSTRY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>