alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of David N. Leibman, a Suspended Attorney, Admitted under the Name David Norman Leibman, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Motions by the petitioner for authorization to include an additional allegation of professional misconduct in the disciplinary proceeding authorized by this court by order dated September 22, 1988, and to discipline the respondent upon charges of professional misconduct. The respondent has submitted his resignation as an attorney by affidavit dated March 16, 1989.

Upon the papers filed in support of these motions and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

*892Ordered that the motions are denied as academic *(see, Matter of Leibman,*150 AD2d 41 [decided herewith]). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Williams, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Evidence that defendant pulled the 13-year-old victim from his pickup truck, led her by the arm into the house, ripped her shirt off, threw her on the sofa and pressed on her shoulders during intercourse constituted legally sufficient proof of forcible compulsion *(see,*Penal Law § 130.00 [8]; *People v Fuller,*50 NY2d 628; *People v Bermudez,*109 AD2d 674, *appeal dismissed*67 NY2d 758).

We find that the jury verdict was not contrary to the weight of evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct are not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]), and the exercise of our discretion in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]) is not warranted. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J. — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------------x 

NEW YORK STATE RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

- against - 

NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF HEALTH, NEW YORK 

CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL 

HYGIENE, and Thomas R. Frieden, in His Official 

Capacity as Commissioner of the New York City 

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 

 Defendants. 

07 CIV 5710 (RJH) 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------x 

Cross-Motion by: Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of 

New York, attorney for defendants NEW YORK CITY 

BOARD OF HEALTH, NEW YORK CITY 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL 

HYGIENE, and Thomas R. Frieden, in His Official 

Capacity as Commissioner of the New York City 

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 

Location and Date of Return: Before United States District Judge Richard J. Holwell, 

Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New 

York, NY 10007, on July 25, 2007, at 2:30 p.m. 

Supporting Papers: The Declaration of Dr. Thomas Frieden, dated July 5, 2007, 

and the exhibits annexed thereto; the Declaration of Bruce 

Krueger, dated July 3, 2007; the City’s Rule 56.1 

Statement, dated July 24, 2007; the Defendants’ 

Memorandum of Law, dated July 5, 2007; and upon all of 

the proceedings heretofore had herein. 

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 50 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment -2- 

Relief Requested: An Order, pursuant to FRCP 56(b), granting summary 

judgment to the defendants, and for such further relief as 

this Court may deem just and proper. 

 

Dated: New York, New York 

 July 24, 2007 

MICHAEL A. CARDOZO 

Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, 

Attorney for the City Defendants 

By: 

LOUISE MOED (LM 7442) 

Assistant Corporation Counsel 

100 Church Street (Admin. Law Div.) 

New York, NY 10007 

(212) 788-0768 phone 

(212) 791-9714 fax 

By ECF: Peter Zimroth, attorney for plaintiff 

Stephen Henry Gardner, attorney for amici Public Citizen and CSPI 

Brian Lewis Bromberg, attorney for amicus Rudd Center for Food Policy & 

Obesity 

By e-mail: Francesca Gessner, attorney for amici City and County of San Francisco et al. 

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 50 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2562
EARL C. WALTON, Agent; CARL L. PHILLIPS, Agent; CHARLES A. BROWN, Agent, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus TIDEWATER VIRGINIA FEDERAL EMPLOYEES METAL TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO, Defendant - Appellee, JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-94-967) Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 13, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Francis Hennessy, III, SuAnne Leigh Hardee, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellants. Sally Momsen Tedrow, Robert Matisoff, O'DONOGHUE & O'DONOGHUE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM:Appellants seek to appeal an order of the district court dismissing Tidewater Virginia Federal Employees Metal Trades Council, AFL-CIO (the Union), from this proceeding. The action continues against John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy. The Union has movedto dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We grant the Union's motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered October 18, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00770-CV

DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC., Appellant

V.

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., AND PATRICK DAUGHERTY,

Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04005

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant Dow Jones & Company, Inc.’s October 9, 2018 Unopposed 

Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority. We GRANT the Motion and 

ORDER that the supplemental authority we received on October 9, 2018 is filed as of the date of 

this order.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
Case 1:07-cv-05421-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05421-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF THE


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Peter J. Bergmann, the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial officer of YP Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of YP Corp.





Date: August 18, 2004
*/s/ Peter J. Bergmann*Peter J. BergmannChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
Clear All

        21 September 2022    

                    USS Bataan Celebrates 25th Birthday                 
                NAVAL STATION NORFOLK, Va. -  The crew of USS Bataan (LHD 5) celebrated the ship’s 25th birthday during a ceremony onboard the ship at Naval Station Norfolk, Sept. 20.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65-2 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65-2 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 65-2 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCIES:

Forest Service, USDA; Bureau of Land Management, USDI.

# ACTION:

Notice; intent to prepare Supplement to Environmental Impact Statement. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The NOI to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for this project was published in the February 25, 1998 issue of the                         **Federal Register**                        . A Draft EIS was released to the public in March 1999. In July and August of 2000, an extensive wildfire called the Cave Gulch Fire burned a high percentage of the project area being considered for vegetation treatments (The Magpie-Confederate Vegetation Restoration portion of the original project). Because of this changed condition, the Forest Service is withdrawing all vegetation management proposals from the project including treatment of noxious weeds, renaming the project, and proceeding with the travel planning portion of the project. The Forest Service feels this is the appropriate approach with this project in that it retains a considerable amount of public input received in conjunction with previous scoping efforts. The BLM has considered only travel management throughout the course of the project. The agencies expect to release a Draft Supplement EIS in June, 2001. A 45 day comment period will be provided, and all comments will be used to develop a Final EIS.                    

# ADDRESSES:

The responsible official is Thomas J. Clifford, Forest Supervisor, Helena National Forest, Supervisor's Office, 2880 Skyway Drive, Helena, MT. 59602. Phone: (406) 449-5201.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lois Olsen, Interdisciplinary Team Leader, Helena National Forest, Supervisor's Office, 2880 Skyway Drive, Helena, MT. 59602. Phone: (406) 449-5201, extension 251.

Dated: April 24, 2001.

Thomas J. Clifford,

Forest Supervisor, Helena National Forest.

[FR Doc. 01-11446  Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-71578) pertaining to the Employee New Stock 
Purchase Plan, as amended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 
33-71580, 33-35640 and 2-98541) pertaining to the 1990 Amended and Restated 
Stock Option Plan, as amended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 
33-71484) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, and 
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-17194) pertaining to the 1985 
Restricted Value Stock Plan, as amended of Grubb & Ellis Company and 
Subsidiaries of our report dated August 18, 1997, with respect to the 
financial statements of Grubb & Ellis Company and Subsidiaries included in 
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1997, filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission.


ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
September 23, 1997
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 3 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 4 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 5 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 6 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 7 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 8 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 9 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 10 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 11 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 12 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 13 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 14 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 15 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 16 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 17 of 18
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 18 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Clear All

        02 March 2023    

                    Learning Mindset: Carrier Strike Group 4 Unveils Root Cause Analysis Tool to Improve Fleet Performance                 
                Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 4 staff hosted the first-ever “Root Cause Analysis Tool (RCAT) University” at CSG-4 Headquarters, Feb. 27 to 28.            

        20 January 2023    

                    Tactical Training Group Atlantic Hosts Warfare Commanders Conference to Build Teamwork, Boost Readiness                 
                Tactical Training Group Atlantic (TTGL) hosted a warfare commanders conference for Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 2 leadership from Jan. 9 to 20. Tactical Training Group Atlantic (TTGL) hosted a warfare commanders conference for Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 2 leadership from Jan. 9 to 20.            

        09 November 2022    

                    Marine Corps 247th Birthday 'Relay Run' Makes Strides on Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story                 
                Marines, Sailors and civilians assigned to Expeditionary Warfare Training Group, Atlantic (EWTGLANT) celebrated the 247th Marine Corps Birthday with a relay run on Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story from Nov. 7-9.            

        24 October 2022    

                    Carrier Strike Group 4 Exercise Enhances Beginning of Gerald R. Ford Inaugural Deployment with NATO Allies                 
                The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group and ships from three North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries completed a three-week exercise orchestrated by Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 4 called Task Force Exercise (TFEX) 23-2 from Oct. 5 to 23.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with this amendment to the Annual Report of Pogo Producing Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”), I, Paul G. Van Wagenen, Chairman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge that:

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.

|        | /s/ PAUL G. VAN WAGENEN                         |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul G. Van Wagenen                             |
|   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

October  27, 2006

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 

JAIME ROJAS, 07-CV-04511 (AKH) 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

-againstNOTICE OF DEFENDANT VERIZON 

NEW YORK INC.’S ADOPTION OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

VERIZON NEW YORK INC., 

et al.

 

 

Defendants. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Verizon New York Inc. (“Verizon”) 

hereby adopts as its Answer in the instant case its Answer to Plaintiffs’ Master Complaint which 

was filed and served on October 16, 2007 in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower 

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). In accordance with Case Management 

Order No. 4, the allegations of the instant Check-Off Complaint are deemed to be denied. 

Verizon also incorporates by reference all averments and denials of its Answer to Plaintiffs’ 

Master Complaint as though same were more fully set forth herein at length. Verizon further 

adopts the responses contained in any Amended Answer filed and served herein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Verizon reserves the right to file and 

serve an amended answer and specifically reserves the right to interpose cross-claims and thirdparty claims. 

WHEREFORE, Verizon demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against Verizon, together with its cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 52 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Dated: November 26, 2007 /s/ Eric F. Leon 

Eric F. Leon 

Lee Ann Stevenson 

Andrew Dunlap 

Michael D. Reisman 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Citigroup Center 

153 East 53rd Street 

New York, New York 10022-4611 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Attorneys for Defendant Verizon New York Inc.

TO: Christopher LoPalo, Esq. 

WORBY GRONER EDELMAN & NAPOLI BERN, LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

 Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

ROBERT A. GROCHOW, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

 Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATA 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 Marc D. Weinblatt, Esq. 

SANDERS, SANDERS, BLOCK, WOYICK, VIENER & GROSSMAN, P.C. 

100 Herricks Road 

Mineola, New York 11501 

 David Kremen, Esq. 

OSHMAN & MIRISOLA, LLP 

42 Broadway, 10th Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

 

All Defense Counsel (via ECF)

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 52 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-2 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-2 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-2 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
(84 South. 924)

#### FARMERS’ MUT. INS. ASS’N v. SMITH, Commissioner.

(6 Div. 807.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 27, 1919.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; H. A. Sharpe, Judge.

N. L. Steele, of Birmingham, for appellant.

F. L. Tate, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                          25,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  177,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,203
<INVENTORY>                                    147,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               356,552
<PP&E>                                         170,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 653,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          190,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,729
<OTHER-SE>                                     315,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   653,587
<SALES>                                      1,056,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,056,168
<CGS>                                          825,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  940,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,146)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,043
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             60,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,507
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37


</TABLE>