alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        14 February 2024    

                    50 Years of Building and Restoring Maritime Capabilities: Celebrating the Underwater Construction Teams Anniversary                 
                The Navy’s Underwater Construction Teams (UCT) One and Two will celebrate half a century of subsurface construction progress and prowess Feb. 15.            

        02 March 2023    

                    Amphibious Construction Battalion TWO (ACB2) Holds Decommissioning Ceremony After Nearly 80 Years Service to the Navy and Marine Corps                 
                JOINT EXPEDITIONARY BASE LITTLE CREEK-FORT STORY, Va. - On March 2, Amphibious Construction Battalion TWO (ACB2) held a decommissioning ceremony at the Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek (JEBLC) chapel after nearly 80 years of service to the Navy and Marine Corps team and our nation.              

        01 February 2023    

                    Fourth Navy Expeditionary Logistics Regiment Decommissions After 17 Years of Service                 
                Fourth Navy Expeditionary Logistics Regiment (NELR) held the command’s decommissioning ceremony at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, Jan. 20, 2023.Attendees of the ceremony included Rear Adm. Dennis Collins, Commander, Navy Expeditionary Logistics Support Group; Capt. Andrew Duessel, Commodore,            

        30 September 2022    

                    Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Changes Command                 
                 Rear Adm. Bradley Andros, from Poughkeepsie, New York, relieved Rear Adm. Joseph DiGuardo Jr., from Fallston, Maryland, as commander, Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), during a ceremony at Assault Craft Unit 4 onboard Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story. DiGuardo, who            

        23 August 2022    

                    Navy and Marine Corps Team Conduct Expeditionary Rapid Airfield Damage Repair                 
                CAMP SHELBY, Miss. - Seabees from Naval Mobile Construction Battalion (NMCB) 1 and Marines from Marine Wing Support Squadron (MWSS) 273 with Sailors from Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit (EODMU) 6 conducted an Expeditionary Airfield Damage Repair (ExR-ADR) exercise at Camp Shelby, Miss, July            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intermec, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended April 2, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry D. Brady, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Larry D.  Brady        |     |
|----------------------------|----------|
| Larry D. Brady             |     |
| *Chief  Executive Officer* | * * |
| May 12, 2006               |     |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-05723-KMK Document 2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                                AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We have issued our report dated February 8, 2000, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Windmere-Durable Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1999. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statements of Windmere-Durable Holdings, Inc. on Form
S-8 (File No. 33-7681, effective September 30, 1986), Form S-8 (File No.
33-36424, effective August 17, 1990), Form S-2 (File No. 33-51776, effective
January 19, 1993), Form S-8 (File No. 33-58574, effective February 22, 1993),
Form S-8 (File No. 333-52389, effective May 12, 1998), Form S-8 (File No.
333-52383, effective May 12, 1998) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-86507, effective
August 3, 1999).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Miami, Florida
March 29, 2000
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-20-00029-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 360th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 360-596086-16

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN THE INTEREST OF B.I. AND R.A., CHILDREN
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On July 6, 2020, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the 

appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the 

court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the 

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: August 20, 2020
#                                                                         U.S. Navy Riverine Vietnam Veteran Posthumously Awarded Bronze Star with Valor                                                                    

##### by Ensign Samantha M. Prewitt

18 August 2023VIRGINIA BEACH, Va.  -- 

                Lt. j.g. William Collins stands aboard patrol craft fast 53 with his crewmates.            

                U.S. Navy Riverine Vietnam Veteran Posthumously Awarded Bronze Star with Valor            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Courtesy Photo

VIRIN: 230818-N-N0748-1003

Tags:
**Bronze Star**NECC
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00221-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.O., A Minor Child

From the 225th District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2003-EN5-06320

Honorable Delia E. Carian, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 8, 2009

DISMISSED

The clerk’s record was due on April 13, 2009. On April 28, 2009, this court ordered

appellant to provide written proof to this court that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or

arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without

paying the clerk’s fee. Our order stated that if appellant failed to respond within the time provided,

this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX.R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Appellant did

not respond to our order. Also, a filing fee of $175.00 was due from appellant when this appeal was

filed but was not paid. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b)(1), 51.941(a)(1) (Vernon 2005);

TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN CIVIL CASES IN THE SUPREME
04-09-00221-CV

-2-

COURT AND THE COURTS OF APPEALS (July 21, 1998) § B.1.(a). The clerk of the court notified

appellant of this deficiency in a letter dated April 17, 2009. The fee remains unpaid. Rule 5 of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay – at

the time an item is presented for filing – whatever fees are required by statute or

Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is

just.

TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 

Accordingly, on June 2, 2009, this court ordered appellant to provide written proof to this

court that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s

fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We also ordered appellant

to either (1) pay the applicable filing fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is excused

by statute or the Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1

(providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without

advance payment of costs). Our order informed appellant that if he failed to respond satisfactorily

within the time ordered, this appeal would be dismissed. See TEX.R. APP. P. 42.3. No response has

been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant. 

PER CURIAM
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20072

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GLYNN MICHAEL KIRKLAND,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CR-256-1

--------------------

December 9, 1999

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Glynn Michael Kirkland appeals his

conviction following a jury trial on two counts of possession of a

fire arm by a convicted felon arising out of the purchase of a

sho tgun while he was employed as a sales manager at a used car

dealership. Kirkland concedes that his counsel failed to renew his

motion for judgment of acquittal, and thus, our review is limited

to determining whether there was a manifest miscarriage of justice.

See United States v. Galvan

, 949 F.2d 777, 783 ( 5th Cir. 1991).

Such a miscarriage occurs only when the record is devoid of2

evidence to support the verdict or when the evidence is so tenuous

with respect to a key element of the offense that a conviction

would be shocking. See id.

Wi th respect to the first count, the evidence was

uncontradicted that Kirkland decided to purchase the shot g un,

provided the funds for it, transported it in his vehicle, and had

access to it. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to

the Government, see id. at 782-83, we cannot say that the record is

devoid of evidence of Kirkland’s intent or that the evidence of

guilt was so tenuous as to render a guilty verdict shocking.

We also reject Kirkland’s contention that the variance between

the date alleged in the indictment and the evidence adduced at

trial is fatal to his conviction. The time an offense is committed

is not an essential element of the offense, and the Government need

not prove the exact date. S ee United States v. B owman , 783 F.2d

1192, 1197 (5th Cir. 1986). The record is not devoid of evidence

that the offense occurred in October as alleged in the indictment.

Further, a four or five month discrepancy is not unreasonable. S ee

i d. Any confusion regarding the precise date does not alter the

fact that both the Donaldsons testified that Kirkland retrieved the

shotgun and Mrs. Donaldson saw him drive away with it in his car.

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the

district court.

AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 5-3 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM *10-Q
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,131,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,303,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,642,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,612,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      10,992,132
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,747,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,549,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,813,582
<OTHER-SE>                                     800,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,549,566
<SALES>                                     62,855,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,855,934
<CGS>                                       49,581,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,581,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,307,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,154,017
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             226,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,820,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                   417,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,403,611
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                143,308
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,260,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET DUE TO THE NATURE OF ITS
INDUSTRY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**We consent to the use in this annual report of Bell Canada on Form 40-F of our comments by auditorsfor U.S. readers on Canada-U.S. reporting differences and auditors’ report both dated January 31,2006 on the consolidated balance sheets of Bell Canada as at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and theconsolidated statements of operations, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years inthe two-year period ended December 31, 2005 which appear in this annual report of Bell Canada onForm 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.           (signed) Deloitte & Touche LLP           Deloitte & Touche LLP  Montreal, Canada
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Hypercom Corporation
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I certify that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003 of Hypercom Corporation (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Hypercom Corporation.

| |  |                                     
| |  | ------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ C. S. Alexander             
| |  |                                     
| |  | Christopher S. Alexander            
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
#                                                                         Learning Mindset: Carrier Strike Group 4 Unveils Root Cause Analysis Tool to Improve Fleet Performance                                                                    

##### by Carrier Strike Group 4 Public Affairs

02 March 2023NORFOLK, Va. -- 

Tags:
**Carrier Strike Group 4**CSG 4**Root Cause Analysis Tool**RCAT**readiness**training**Learning Mindset
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05421-AKH Document 7 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05421-AKH Document 7 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05421-AKH Document 7 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05421-AKH Document 7 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05421-AKH Document 7 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05421-AKH Document 7 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-4 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 10.38


 


AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE
EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of May 13, 2019, by and among Chongqing Jinghuangtai
Enterprise Management and Consulting Co., Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)
(“Pledgee”); Chongqing Penglin Food Co., Ltd., a limited liability company organized under the laws of the PRC
(“Penglin”) and Xiaolin Cao, a shareholder holding 0.8% of the equity interests of Penglin (“Pledgor”,
with Pledgee and Penglin collectively referred to as the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS, in connection
with a certain Technical Consultation and Service Agreement dated as of October 9, 2017, and, Amendment to Technical Consultation
and Service Agreement dated as of February 25, 2018 (collectively, the “Consulting Agreement”), Pledgee entered
into an Equity Pledge Agreement dated as of February 25, 2018 (the “Equity Pledge Agreement”) with Penglin and
Pledgee;


 


WHEREAS, Pledgor and
Zeshu Dai, as of the date hereof, have entered into a certain Share Transfer Agreement (the “Share Transfer Agreement”),
pursuant to which Pledgor has transferred all equity interest of Penglin to Zeshu Dai and no longer been the shareholder of Penglin;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration,
the Parties agree as follows:


 


A.       TERMINATION
OF THE EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT.


 


(1)       Pledgee
hereby terminates the Equity Pledge Agreement, and Pledgor and Pledgee hereby accept such termination.


 


(2)       Each
of the Pledgee, Pledgor and Penglin acknowledges that all service fees under Consulting Agreement have been settled, if any and
the Pledgor will not undertake any further obligations under the Consulting Agreement.


 


B.       GOVERNING
LAW. This Agreement shall be governed and construed under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, and shall be binding
on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.


 


C.       COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one instrument.


 


[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]


 






     


     


    

 





SIGNATURE PAGE


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their legal representatives and duly
authorized representatives on their behalf as of the date first set forth above.


 


Pledgee:


 


Chongqing Jinghuangtai Enterprise Management and Consulting
Co., Ltd.


 


 


	By:	/s/
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Name:
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Title:
    Legal Representative	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Chongqing
    Penglin Food Co., Ltd.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Name:
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Title:
    Legal Representative	 
	 	 
	Pledgor:	 
	 	 
	Xiaolin
    Cao	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Xiaolin Cao	 
	Xiaolin
    Cao
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 12 of 12