alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7518

STEFEN E. HARRIS , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. DAVID DUNLAP, Warden , Respondent

– Appellee , and
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 0:16

- cv - 00858

- HMH )

Submitted : March 22, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ , Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Stefe n E

. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Stefen Emira Harris , a state prisoner , seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice as an unauthorized second or successive petition . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabi lity. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispen se with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION AS OF AND FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001045710
<NAME> FRONTIERVISION HOLDINGS, LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         440,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,228,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,160,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     975,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,228,021
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,413
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,918)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,658)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,658)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Clear All

        13 October 2022    

                    Kearsarge ARG Returns after Deployment in the High North and Baltic Sea                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - Sailors and Marines assigned to the Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) returned home to Norfolk and Virginia Beach, Virginia after completing a seven-month deployment in the Sixth Fleet area of operations, Oct. 13.            

        19 April 2022    

                    USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44) Arrives in Narvik, Norway                 
                The Whidbey Island-class amphibious dock landing ship USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44), assigned to the Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), arrived in Narvik, Norway for a scheduled port visit to enhance U.S.-Norway relations and build NATO Alliance cohesion,            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Carbon

Monoxide Safety

Did you know? 

More than 150 people in the U.S. die every year from 

accidental nonfire-related carbon monoxide poisoning.

Carbon monoxide or CO is a colorless and odorless gas. CO poisoning 

can occur when a fuel-burning appliance or machine, such as a furnace, 

heater or generator, is not working or vented properly. Breathing in CO 

at high levels can be fatal.

Learn what you can do to protect your family from the dangers of CO.

o Install and maintain CO alarms inside your home to provide early 

warning of CO.

o Install CO alarms in a central location outside each separate sleeping 

area and on every level of your home.

o Use portable generators outdoors in well-ventilated areas away from all 

doors, windows and vents.

o Make sure vents for the dryer, furnace, stove and fireplace are clear of 

snow and other debris.

For more information and free resources, visit

www.usfa.fema.gov
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.24
 
 Amendment enherent Parent Borrower Borrowers Ableco Agent Lenders
 Financing Agreement
    Definitions in Amendment
 Definition in the Financing Agreement
  First Amendment
 First Amendment Effective Date
 Overadvance Period
  Borrowing Base less




---



##### 



less
 Additional Equity
 Additional Equity
 Amendment Fee Amendment Fee
 Conditions to Effectiveness First Amendment Effective Date
     Representatives and Warranties
 Representations and Warranties: No Event of Default
 2




---



##### 



Organization, Good Standing, Etc.
 Authorization, Etc.
 Governmental Approvals
 Enforceability of Loan Documents
 Continued Effectiveness of Loan Agreement
 Miscellaneous
    3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



BORROWERS:ENHERENT CORP.By:
    
    /s/ Pamela FredetteName: Pamela FredetteTitle: President & CEOAGENT and LENDER:ABLECO FINANCE LLC, as lender and agent,
on behalf of itself and its affiliate
assignsBy:
    
    Daniel WolfName: Daniel WolfTitle: SVP
 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         419,000
<SECURITIES>                                    10,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  736,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                    553,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,730,000
<PP&E>                                       6,088,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 252,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,355,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,935,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    200,000
<COMMON>                                       612,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (58,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,355,000
<SALES>                                      7,191,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,191,000
<CGS>                                        1,905,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,814,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,909,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (5,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                382,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   150,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            382,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   232,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14 
        

</TABLE>
# CE2010265EN.01004302.xml

| 30.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 265/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 265/43

---

Tuesday 20 October 2009Agreement between the EC and Seychelles on the short-stay visa waiver *

P7_TA(2009)0043

European Parliament legislative resolution of 20 October 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Seychelles on the short-stay visa waiver (COM(2009)0052 – C7-0012/2009 – 2009/0015(CNS))

2010/C 265 E/22

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2009)0052),

having regard to Article 62(2)(b)(i) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0012/2009),

having regard to Rules 55 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0012/2009),

| 1. | Approves the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Seychelles. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Seychelles.

---
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-68171 on Form S-8 dated December 1, 1998, in the Registration Statement No. 333-80163 on Form S-8 dated June 8, 1999, in Registration Statement No. 333-64286 of Form S-3 dated June 29, 2001, in Registration Statement No. 333-89016 on Form S-8 dated May 24, 2002 of Knight-Ridder, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, of our report dated January 21, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Knight-Ridder, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 29, 2002.

|                                     | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                                     |                      |
| *San   Jose, California   March 3, 2003* |                      |

73

----
|                                | (1)    |       | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-105623) pertaining to the registration of      2,178,205 shares of common stock pursuant to the Amended and Restated      Employee Stock Purchase Plan;                        |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|       |   |
|                                | (2)    |                                | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-86268) pertaining to 1,087,541 shares of      common stock related to certain Stock Option Grants outside of a      plan;                                                      |
|                                |   |
|                                | (3)    |                                | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74076) pertaining to 6,000,000 shares of      common stock pursuant to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan;                                                                          |
|                                |   |
|                                | (4)    |                                | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41090) pertaining to 5,687,318 shares of      common stock pursuant to the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1999 Stock      Incentive Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan; |
|                                |   |
|                                | (5)    |                                | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-136182) pertaining to 6,000,000 shares of the      2006 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan; and                                                                            |
|                                |   |
|                                | (6)    |                                | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-142362) pertaining to $175,000,000 of 2.5%      Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2012 and 7,277,567 shares of common      stock;                                             |

----
Exhibit 32.3 -- Certification required under Section 906
                of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                    PISMO COAST VILLAGE, INC.

  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Subsection 1350 of the
  ----------------------------------------------------------
                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     -----------------------

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
"Report") of Pismo Coast Village, Inc. (The "Company") for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, the undersigned, Jack
Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Subsection 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Date: November 13, 2010    /S/ JACK WILLIAMS
                           Jack Williams, Chief Financial Officer
                           (principal financial officer and
                           principal accounting officer)


                                  1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
# C_2011255EN.01000701.xml

| 31.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/7

---

Corrigendum to Commission notice 2009/C 291/05 of 1 December 2009 concerning parties exempted, pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 on the authorisation of the exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China from the extension by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93, maintained by Council Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 and last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005: changes in the name and address of certain exempted parties

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 291 of 1 December 2009
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 291 of 1 December 2009

2011/C 255/07

On page 9, last paragraph:

for:

‘Steppenwolf GmbH has informed the Commission that the legal address of the company has changed from Wettersteinstrasse 18, 82024 Taufkirchen, GERMANY to Keltenring 9, 82041 Oberhaching, GERMANY.’,

read:

‘Steppenwolf GmbH has informed the Commission that the legal name and address of the company have changed from Steppenwolf GmbH, Wettersteinstrasse 18, 82024 Taufkirchen, GERMANY to Steppenwolf Bikes GmbH, Keltenring 9, 82041 Oberhaching, GERMANY.’;

on page 11, Annex, in the second column of the last row of the table:

for:

‘Steppenwolf GmbH’,

read:

‘Steppenwolf Bikes GmbH’.

---
---

Exhibit
  99.3

COMMENTS
  BY AUDITORS FOR U.S. READERS
  ON CANADA-U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCES

In
  the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of
  an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there are changes
  in accounting principles that have a material effect on the comparability of
  the financial statements, such as the changes described in Note 1 to Bell Canadas
  consolidated financial statements or when there is a retroactive restatement
  such as that described in Note 1. Our report to the shareholders dated March
  10, 2004 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which
  do not require a reference to such changes in accounting principles in the auditors
  report when the changes are properly accounted for and adequately disclosed
  in the financial statements.





|(signed) Deloitte
      & Touche
|--------------------------------
|Deloitte
        & Touche LLP   



Montreal,
  Canada 
  March 10, 2004











---
Clear All

        27 November 2023    

                    IKE Strike Group Transits the Strait of Hormuz                 
                ARABIAN GULF – The Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (IKECSG) completed a scheduled transit through the Strait of Hormuz into the Arabian Gulf, Nov. 26.            

        14 October 2023    

                    USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Departs On Deployment                 
                Aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) (IKE), departed on a scheduled deployment, Oct. 14.            

        13 October 2023    

                    From Daughter to Shipmate                  
                As the Navy celebrates its 248th birthday this year, it allows Naval Air Force Atlantic (AIRLANT) to highlight the Sailors who serve in Naval Aviation.  For the first time in his naval career, AIRLANT’s Force Master Chief Jimmy W. Hailey III, has served on the same coast as his daughter,            

        31 March 2021    

                    IKE Supports Operation Inherent Resolve from Eastern Mediterranean                 
                 Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group began flight operations in support of Operation Inherent Resolve from the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, March 31, 2021.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

JUDITH H. WEISS, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

-againstFRANCES M. CREEM and BETTY M. OLSEN, 

 Defendant(s). 

Index No. 07-CV-5712 

AFFIRMATION 

Return Date: 

April 11, 2008 

SHAWN P. O’SHAUGHNESSY, ESQ., an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the 

Courts of the State of New York and the within jurisdiction, affirms the following under 

the penalties of perjury: 

1. I am an associate attorney with the law offices of DESENA & SWEENEY, 

LLP, attorneys of record for defendant, FRANCES M. CREEM. As such, I 

am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances surrounding the 

proceeding by way of review of the file maintained in this matter by your 

affirmant's office. 

2. This affirmation is made with respect to the motion for summary 

judgment brought by defendant BETTY M. OLSEN. 

3. At the outset, this office received a Stipulation of Discontinuance from Ms. 

OLSEN’s counsel prior to the motion at issue. I indicated our willingness 

to discontinue our cross-claim once the plaintiff had discontinued their 

Complaint against Ms. OLSEN. 

4. I then learned from counsel that plaintiff would only discontinue their 

Complaint upon the condition that defendant CREEM would not seek 

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 25 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

apportionment of liability at the time of trial pursuant to General 

Obligations Law Section 15-108. A copy of the proposed Stipulation of 

Discontinuance is annexed hereto as Exhibit “A”. 

5. Defendant CREEM cannot discontinue under the above referenced terms. 

6. The above issue aside, defendant CREEM remains willing to sign a 

Stipulation of Discontinuance which does not contain any reference to 

General Obligations Law 15-108. 

7. I have communicated the foregoing to counsel for defendant OLSEN on 

this date. He has indicated that plaintiff’s counsel has not signed any 

Stipulation of Discontinuance. 

Dated: Hauppauge, New York 

 March 26, 2008 

 ____________________________________ 

 SHAWN P. O’SHAUGHNESSY (SO-6081) 

 

 

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 25 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 8 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 1