alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        09 August 2023    

                    Navy and Marine Corps Commence Large Scale Exercise 2023                  
                 NORFOLK, Va. -- More than 10,000 Sailors and Marines across 22 times zones are now participating in Large Scale Exercise (LSE) 2023 as the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps officially kick off one of the maritime service’s largest exercises, Aug. 9.LSE 2023, integrating six Navy and Marine Corps            

        14 August 2021    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet is 'Ready to Fight' as it leads 7th Expeditionary Maritime Operations Center during Large Scale Exercise 2021                 
                It's a process, not a place. A Maritime Operation Center, or MOC, can come in many different forms, because what matters is the processes and planning taking place within them.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### THE J. L. LUCKENBACH.

(District Court, N. D. California, First Division.

November 6, 1913.)

No. 15,063.

Shipping (§ 141*)—Damage to Cabgo—Liability oe Vessel.

Under a bill of lading which exempts the vessel from liability for internal or other breakage or rust of metals, she cannot be held liable for damages to articles of hardware from breakage or rust, without proof that it resulted from negligence of the carrier.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Shipping, Cent. Dig. §§ 493, 497-499;. Dec. Dig. § 141.*]

In Admiralty. Suit by the Pacific Hardware & Steel Company. against the steamship J. L, Luckenbach.

Decree for respondent.

Charles A. Strong, of San Francisco, Cal., for libelant.

McCutchen, Olney & Willard, of San Francisco, Cal., for claimant-

*

For other cases see same topic & § numbek in Deo. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

DOOLING, J.

Libelant sues to recover $1,283.02, with interest from the date of the filing of the libel for damages alleged to have been suffered by certain merchandise shipped from New York on the steamship J. L. Luckenbach in good condition and delivered at San Francisco in a damaged condition. The receipt of the merchandise in a good condition and its delivery in a damaged condition are admitted by claimant, but exemption from liability is claimed by reason of thé following provision in the bill of lading:

> “The ship shall not be accountable for leakage, internal or other breakage, rust of metals, chafing of unpacked merchandise, or splits in lumber.”

The proofs on the part of libelant show that some of the merchandise, consisting of various articles of hardware, were received in a badly damaged condition; the damage to some of the articles having been occasioned by breakage and to others by rust. The manner in which the articles were broken is not shown, and the only evidence as to the rust is that it was caused by water. All of the damage shown, having been occasioned by breakage or rust, comes within the exemption in the bill of lading, and libelant cannot recover therefor, without proof that the breakage and rust were due to the negligence of claim*143ant or his agents. Once it is shown that the damage arose from one of the excepted'causes, whether this proof is made by libelant or by claimant, the burden is then upon the shipper to establish that the negligence of the carrier takes the case out of the exception. No such proof was presented here; the libelant being content to rest upon proof of breakage and rust from water. Neither of these shows any negligence on the part of the carrier.

The ship cannot be held accountable for “internal or other breakage or rust of metals.” This is the covenant, and it is broad enough to include, not only rust occasioned by dampness of the atmosphere, but rust occasioned by water as well.

The damage to the goods falling wholly within the terms of the exception, and there being no proof of negligence on the part of the carrier, the libel must be dismissed; and it is so ordered.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. (formerly Rorer Group Inc.) on Form S-3 (Registration
No. 33-58229, Registration No. 33-62052, Registration No. 33-36558, Registration
No. 33-30795, Registration No. 33-23754, Registration No. 15671, Registration
No. 33-53378 and Registration No. 33-55694) and on Form S-8 (Registration No.
33-58998, Registration No. 33-24537 and Registration No. 33-21902) of our report
dated January 22, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995,
and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P
----------------------------------
     Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         448,855
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,754,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,251,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,508,031
<PP&E>                                       4,300,557
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,814,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,021,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,006,307
<BONDS>                                        715,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          175,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,370,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,021,191
<SALES>                                     13,304,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       11,467,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,760,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             213,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                341,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                   184,442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            156,646
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   156,646
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
(85 South. 921)

#### DENT v. FOX.

(4 Div. 853.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 20, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Barbour County; J. S. AYiliams, Judge.

A. H. Merrill & Son, of Eufaula, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID CHAVIRA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 5

- 00128

- CR

Appeal from the

41 st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120D03609 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until November 19

, 201 5

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Joseph D. Vasquez , the Appellant ’s Attor ney,

prepare the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 19 , 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29 th day of October , 201 5

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 8, 2019

a0305 

# Order

Clerk March 8, 2019

159087 & (21)

LAVETA ANDERSON an d CHARLES J.

TAUNT,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 159087

COA: 344549

Oakland CC: 2016

- 153143

- NH

JENNY SHIH, D.O., and THE WELLNESS

PLAN,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

INOCENCIO CUESTA, M.D., MALINI

VENKATRAM, M.D., SUCHITA

BHEEMREDDY, M.D., KARTHIK YADAGIRI,

P.T., RUPA PATEL, P.T., UNIVERSITY

PHYSICIAN GROUP, VHS PHYSICIANS OF

MICHIGAN, HARPER

- HUTZEL HOSPITAL,

LEGACY HHH, VHS HARPER

- HUTZEL, INC.,

VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC., LEGACY DMC,

TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION,

BOTSFORD GENE RAL HOSPITAL,

THERAMATRIX, INC., d/b/a THERAMATRIX

PHYSICAL REHABILITATION,

THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL REHABILITATION,

THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL THERAPY

NETWORK, L.L.C., and THERAMATRIX

PHYSICAL THERAPY PLAN, INC.,

Defendants.

____________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the December 26, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals

is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1 ), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. Trial

court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party

or on its own motion, the Court of A ppeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on

the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other

appropriate grounds appear.
Tracey Lyn Jarzombek, Esq., (TJ-3972)

White & McSpedon, P.C.

875 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 800

New York, NY 10001

212-564-6633

Attorneys for Defendants:

CITIGROUP IIS/H/A CITIBANK, N.A. (solely in connection

with their alleged ownership or occupancy of 120 Broadway)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---- - ------ ---- - - - --- -- - ---- -- - -- - ---- - -- --- -- -------- ---- -- - )(

DOUGLAS CASTLE AND COLEEN CASTLE

21 MC 102 (AKH)

Index No.: 07-CV-05341

Plaintiffs,

-againstNOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER

TO MAST COMPLAINT

120 BROADWAY CONDOMINIUM

(CONDO #871), ET. AL.,

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Defendants.

- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- - --- - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - )(

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that defendants, CITIGROUP IIS/H/A CITIBANK, N.A. (solely in

connection with their alleged ownership or occupancy of 120 Broadway), by their attorneys, White &

McSpedon, P.C, as and for their Response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint fied in the above-referenced action, hereby

adopt their Answer to Master Complaint dated July 31, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In Re

World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litgation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, the defendants, CITIGROUP IIS/H/A CITIBANK, N.A. (solely in connection

with their alleged ownership or occupancy of 120 Broadway), demand judgment dismissing the abovecaptioned action as against them, together with their costs and disbursements and for such other and

further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 24 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York

September 5,2008

Yours etc.,

WHITE & MCSPEDON, P.e.

By: '- /

Tracey L Jar ombe , Esq. (3972)

875 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 800

New York, NY 10001

(212) 564-6633

Attorneys for Defendants

CITIGROUP I/S/H/A CITIBANK, N.A. (solely in

connection with their alleged ownership or

occupancy of 120 Broadway)

TO:

(Service via electronic Pacer filing)

WORBY GRONER & NAPOLI BERN, LLP

Plaintiffs Liaison

In Re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation

115 Broadway, 1zth Floor

New York, NY 10006

212-267-3700

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATTA

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, NY 10279

All Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 24 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 56 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 12.1
 Covanta Holding Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 For the Years Ended December 31,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004(In thousands, except ratios)Earnings as defined in Regulation S-K (1):Income before income tax expense, minority 
interests and equity in net income from
unconsolidated investments
    
    $
    214,878
    
    
    $
    148,013
    
    
    $
    122,228
    
    
    $
    77,565
    
    
    $
    35,474Fixed Charges
    
    
    116,372
    
    
    
    138,488
    
    
    
    187,254
    
    
    
    157,315
    
    
    
    85,698Total Earnings
    
    $
    331,250
    
    
    $
    286,501
    
    
    $
    309,482
    
    
    $
    234,880
    
    
    $
    121,172Fixed Charges as defined in Regulation S-K (2):Interest expense
    
    $
    100,538
    
    
    $
    121,683
    
    
    $
    169,717
    
    
    $
    142,404
    
    
    $
    76,325Imputed interest on operating leases
    
    
    15,834
    
    
    
    16,805
    
    
    
    17,537
    
    
    
    14,911
    
    
    
    9,373Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    116,372
    
    
    $
    138,488
    
    
    
    187,254
    
    
    $
    157,315
    
    
    $
    85,698Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    2.85
    
    
    
    2.07
    
    
    
    1.65
    
    
    
    1.49
    
    
    
    1.41
 
 (1)
    
    For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, the term earnings shall
be defined as income before income tax expense, minority interests and equity in net income
from unconsolidated investments plus fixed charges.(2)
    
    For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, the term fixed charges
shall be defined as interest expense and imputed interest for operating leases.
EXHIBIT 10.10





EXTENSION
AGREEMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


between Jerry A. Cooper (Executive) and


Pogo Producing Company, a Delaware corporation (Company),


dated effective February 1, 2002





WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an Executive Employment Agreement bearing an original Effective Date of
February 1, 1996; and





WHEREAS, February 1, 2002, (even date herewith) is hereby deemed to be the Renewal
Date in that Executive Employment Agreement; and





WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said
Executive Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as to terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit January 31, 2004); and





WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and desires to induce Executive to remain in its employ for that
extended time period; and





WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as an employee of Company for the period
specified herein from and after the date of this Extension Agreement; and





WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to
enter into this Extension Agreement in order to formally secure for Company the benefit of the experience and abilities of Executive, and to set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and Executive; and





WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been duly authorized and
approved by all requisite corporate action on the part of the Company.







---




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreements
herein contained, and in consideration of the sum of $10 paid by Company to Executive, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive and Company do hereby agree as follows:





1.    The Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company bearing an Effective Date of February 1, 1996 and a Renewal Date which
is deemed herein to be February 1, 2002, is hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing February 1, 2003 and ending January 31, 2004, unless such employment period is hereafter further extended for an additional period by both
Executive and Company.





2.    All provisions of the Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and
Company dated as of February 1, 1996, and as it is herein amended, are continued in full force and effect without change as if the Executive Employment Agreement had been initially effective as of February 1, 2002.





POGO PRODUCING COMPANYBy:

/s/    JOHN O. MCCOY,
JR.John O. McCoy, Jr. Senior Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer





ATTEST:/s/    JOEANN KINGDONAssistant Corporate Secretary





EMPLOYEE:/s/    JERRY A. COOPERJerry A. Cooper Senior Vice President
and Western Division Manager
Clear All

        25 September 2023    

                    U.S. Forces Conduct Joint Aviation Integration Exercise in the Gulf of Oman                  
                U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and U.S. Air Forces Central (AFCENT) conducted a joint Air Operation in Maritime Surface Warfare (AOMSW) exercise in the Gulf of Oman, Sept. 23-24.              

        17 September 2023    

                    USS Bataan hosts distinguished visitors from Saudi Arabia at sea                  
                The amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5) with the embarked 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) hosted a delegation from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, including the U.S. ambassador, at sea Sept. 13 for a day-long embark.  The embark was an opportunity for the delegation            

        07 August 2023    

                    3,000 Sailors and Marines Arrive in Middle East aboard USS Bataan, USS Carter Hall                  
                More than 3,000 U.S. Sailors and Marines of the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) arrived in the Middle East, Aug. 6, as part of a pre-announced Department of Defense deployment.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# C_2009098EN.01001101.xml

| 29.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/11

---

Update of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 19, OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 22, OJ C 57, 1.3.2008, p. 38, OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 19, OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 15, OJ C 37, 14.2.2009, p. 8)

2009/C 98/06

The publication of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to publication in the Officiaĺ Journal of the European Union, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security.

Officiaĺ Journal of the European Union

ESTONIA

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 247, 13.10.2006

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 247, 13.10.2006

Under Estonian law, aliens arriving into Estonia without a letter of invitation, shall upon request by a border guard official upon entry into the country provide proof of sufficient monetary means to cover the costs of his/her stay in and departure from Estonia. Sufficient monetary means for each allowed day is considered to be 0,2 times the monthly minimum salary implemented by the Government of the Republic, i.e. EEK 870 (EUR 55,60).

Otherwise the person inviting shall assume responsibility for the costs of the alien's stay in and departure from Estonia.

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

l0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

138574

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138574 COA: 289420 Saginaw CC: 06-028461-FH JOHNNIE PATTERSON, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 11, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                             554100
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      677600
<ALLOWANCES>                        40000
<INVENTORY>                       1595300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3001200
<PP&E>                            5890200
<DEPRECIATION>                  (1673400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    7619900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1105400
<BONDS>                           2077400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           228400
<OTHER-SE>                        4174700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      7619900
<SALES>                          11526100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 12172200
<CGS>                             8392900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     9206900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1365000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     6000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (120100)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1502100
<INCOME-TAX>                       594000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                908100
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       908100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .41

        

</TABLE>