Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2001 / Rules and Regulations 22907

shall include wording as follows:

‘‘Inspected for wholesomeness by U.S.

Department of Agriculture.’’ This

wording shall be contained within a

circle. The form and arrangement of

such wording shall be exactly as

indicated in the example in Figure 1,

except that the appropriate official

establishment number shall be shown,

and if the establishment number

appears elsewhere on the labeling

material in the manner prescribed in

§ 381.123(b), it may be omitted from the

inspection mark. The administrator may

approve the use of abbreviations of such

inspection mark; and such approved

abbreviations shall have the same force

and effect as the inspection mark. The

official inspection legend, or the

approved abbreviation thereof, shall be

printed on consumer packages and other

immediate containers of inspected and

passed poultry products, or on labels to

be securely affixed to such containers of

such products and may be printed or

stenciled thereon, but shall not be

applied by rubber stamping. When

applied by a stencil, the legend shall not

be less than 4 inches in diameter. An

official brand must be applied to

inspected and passed carcasses and

parts of ratites that are shipped

unpacked.

Done at Washington, DC, on: April 25,

2001.

Thomas J. Billy,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 01–10679 Filed 4–26–01; 1:36 pm]

BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P

Editorial Note: Federal Register rule

document 01-10679 originally appeared in

the issue of Tuesday, May 1, 2001 at 66 FR

21631-21639. Due to several errors (repeated

text and missing text on page 21635) the

document is being reprinted in its entirety.

[FR Doc. R1–10679 Filed 5–4–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 9

[3150–AG78]

Charges for Reproducing Records

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) is revising its

regulations to permit its contractor to

increase the charges for copying

publicly available documents at the

NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR).

The increases are necessary to adjust for

inflation and a decrease in the projected

volume of copying by the NRC

contractor. In addition, the revisions

will provide for electronic copying to

CD–ROM.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The rule is effective

June 6, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas E. Smith, Acting Chief, Public

Document Room, Office of the Chief

Information Officer, Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555,

301–415–7204, or 1–800–397–4209

(toll-free).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PDR

retains a copy service to reproduce for

a fee publicly available documents

whatever their format. Since the NRC’s

Agency-wide Document Access and

Management System (ADAMS) was

implemented in November 2000,

making recently released documents

available in full text online, there has

been a significant reduction in the

volume of document reproduction. The

total volume of copying has fallen from

over 3,000,000 pages a year to 1,600,000

in 2000. Based on first quarter data, the

projected level of copying for 2001 will

be just under 1,000,000 pages. Since the

copy service contract is at no cost to the

government, the contractor must

provide all supplies and equipment.

The NRC believes that the price increase

is reasonable and in line with the prices

charged by other Federal agencies. A

market survey showed that the average

price is 20 cents per page for paper-topaper copies and 27 cents for

microfiche-to-paper copies.

The contractor will offer two new

services to the public: copying

documents from ADAMS to CD–ROM

and copying color documents from

ADAMS to paper. The contractor will be

able to accept orders directly online

from ADAMS through the new ADAMS

Online Order Module scheduled to be

released shortly.

Because this amendment concerns an

agency practice and procedure, the NRC

has determined that notice and

comment under the Administrative

Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b) (A) and

(B), is unnecessary and that good cause

exists to dispense with the comment.

Environmental Impact: Categorical

Exclusion

The NRC has determined that this

final rule is the type of action described

in categorical exclusion 10 CFR 51.22

(c) (1) and (2). Therefore, neither an

environmental impact statement nor an

environmental assessment has been

prepared for this final rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

This final rule does not contain a new

or amended information collection

requirement subject to the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501

et seq.).

Public Protection Notification

If a means used to impose an

information collection does not display

a currently valid OMB control number,

the NRC may not conduct or sponsor,

and a person is not required to respond

to, the information collection.

Regulatory Analysis

A regulatory analysis has not been

prepared for this final rule because the

final rule makes only minor conforming

changes to the regulations that reference

Section 202 of the Energy

Reorganization Act and minor changes

to other regulations.

Backfit Analysis

The NRC has determined that these

amendments do not involve any

provisions which would impose backfits

as defined in 10 CFR 50.109(a)(1);

therefore a backfit analysis need not be

prepared.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act

In accordance with the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, the NRC has

determined that this action is not a

major rule and has verified this

determination with the Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs of

OMB.

List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 9

Criminal penalties, freedom of

information, privacy, reporting and

recordkeeping requirements, the

Sunshine Act.

For the reasons set out in the

preamble and under the authority of the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,

the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,

as amended, and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553,

the NRC is adopting the following

amendments to 10 CFR Part 9.

PART 9—PUBLIC RECORDS

1. The authority citation for Part 9

continues to read as follows:

Authority: Sec. 161, 68 Stat. 948, as

amended (42 U.S.C. 2201); Sec. 201, 88 Stat.

1242, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5841).

Subpart A is also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552

and 31 U.S.C. 9701; (Pub. L. 99–570). Subpart

B is also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a. Subpart

C is also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552b.

2. Section 9.35 is amended by revising

paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:

22908 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

§ 9.35 Duplication fees.

(a)(1) The charges by the duplicating

service contractor for the duplication of

records made available under § 9.21 at

the NRC Public Document Room (PDR),

One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville

Pike, Room O–1F23, Rockville, MD. are

as follows:

(i) Paper-to-paper reproduction is

$0.15 per page for standard size (up to

11′′ × 14′′). Pages 11′′ × 17′′ are $0.30 per

page. Pages larger than 11′′ × 17′′,

including engineering drawings, are

$2.50 per square foot.

(ii) Color drawings are $2.00 per 81⁄2′′

× 11′′ page. Pages larger than 81⁄2′′ × 11′′

are $12.00 per square foot.

(iii) Microfiche-to-paper reproduction

is $0.15 per page. Aperture cards are

$2.50 per square foot.

(iv) The charges for Electronic Full

Text (EFT) (ADAMS documents)

copying are as follows:

(A) Electronic Full Text (EFT) copying

of ADAMS documents to paper (applies

to images, OCR TIFF, and PDF text) is

$0.15 per page.

(B) Electronic Full Text (EFT) copying

of ADAMS documents to CD–ROM is

$10.00 for the first document on the

CD–ROM and $5.00 for each additional

document per accession number on the

same CD–ROM.

(C) CD–ROM-to-paper reproduction is

$0.15 per page.

(v) Priority rates (rush processing) are

as follows:

(A) The priority rate is offered for

standard size paper-to-paper

reproduction, microfiche-to-paper

reproduction, electronic full text (EFT)

copying of ADAMS documents to paper,

and CD–ROM-to-paper production at

$0.20 per page. The priority rate for

standard size color prints is $2.50 per

print. The priority rate for color

drawings larger than 81⁄2′′ × 11′′ is

$15.00 per square foot.

(B) The priority rate for aperture cards

is $3.50 per square foot. The priority

rate for electronic full text (EFT) to CD–

ROM is $15.00 for the first document on

the CD–ROM and $7.50 per each

additional document on the same CD–

ROM.

(vi) Facsimile charges are $0.30 per

page for local calls; $0.50 per page for

U.S. long distance calls, and $1.00 per

page for foreign long distance calls.

* * * * *

Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 25th

day of April 2001.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

William D. Travers,

Executive Director for Operations.

[FR Doc. 01–11387 Filed 5–4–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2001–NM–68–AD; Amendment

39–12210; AD 2001–09–05]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model

A310–324, A310–325, and A300 B4–

622R Series Airplanes Equipped with

Pratt & Whitney PW4000 Series

Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for

comments.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD) that is

applicable to certain Airbus Model

A310–324, A310–325, and A300 B4–

622R series airplanes equipped with

Pratt & Whitney PW4000 series engines.

This action requires revising the

Airplane Flight Manuals (AFM) for the

Model A310 and Model A300–600

series airplanes. This action is necessary

to prevent acceleration and climb

performance less than that specified in

the AFM, which could result in runway

overruns or impact with obstacles or

terrain. This action is intended to

address the identified unsafe condition.

DATES: Effective May 22, 2001.

The incorporation by reference of

certain publications listed in the

regulations is approved by the Director

of the Federal Register as of May 22,

2001.

Comments for inclusion in the Rules

Docket must be received on or before

June 6, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in

triplicate to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), Transport

Airplane Directorate, ANM–114,

Attention: Rules Docket Number 2001–

NM–68–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,

Renton, Washington 98055–4056.

Comments may be inspected at this

location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00

p.m., Monday through Friday, except

Federal holidays. Comments may be

submitted via fax to (425) 227–1232.

Comments may also be sent via the

Internet using the following address: 9-

anm-iarcomment@faa.gov. Comments

sent via fax or the Internet must contain

‘‘Docket No. 2001–NM–68–AD’’ in the

subject line and need not be submitted

in triplicate. Comments sent via the

Internet as attached electronic files must

be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for

Windows or ASCII text.

The service information referenced in

this AD may be obtained from Airbus

Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice

Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.

This information may be examined at

the FAA, Transport Airplane

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,

Renton, Washington; or at the Office of

the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol

Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim

Backman, Aerospace Engineer, ANM–

116, International Branch, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington

98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2797;

fax (425) 227–1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

has received reports that Pratt &

Whitney Model PW4000 series engines

with certain early-production fan blades

(Phase 0/1, FB2B or FB2T) installed on

Airbus Model A310–324, A310–325,

and A300 B4–622R series airplanes do

not produce the amount of thrust

indicated in the AFM. This thrust

shortfall is due to erosion of the fan

blade’s leading edge. The flight crew has

no indication of this shortfall in thrust.

This condition results in acceleration

and climb performance less than that

specified in the AFM, which, if not

corrected, could result in an overrun of

the runway or impact with an obstacle

or terrain.

Explanation of Relevant Service

Information

The Direction Ge ́ne ́rale de l’Aviation

Civile (DGAC), which is the

airworthiness authority for France, has

requested that Airbus prepare revisions

to the AFM to take into account the

reduction in performance associated

with PW4000 series engines fitted with

early-production fan blades and to

incorporate the necessary adjustments

in performance. Those revisions are

expected to be available from Airbus in

mid-2001. Meanwhile, Airbus has

issued the following Temporary

Revisions (TR) to the AFM, each dated

January 22, 2001:

A310 Flight Manual TR 5.03.00/01 (for

Airbus Model A310–324 series airplanes);

A310 Flight Manual TR 5.03.00/02 (for

Airbus Model A310–325 series airplanes);

and

A300–600 Flight Manual TR 5.03.00/01 (for

Airbus Model A300 B4–622R series

airplanes).

These TR’s contain performance

adjustments for the AFM for Model

A310–324, A310–325, and A300 B4–

622R series airplanes equipped with one

or more Pratt & Whitney Model PW4000

series engine with early-production fan

blades. The DGAC classified these TR’s

as mandatory and issued French

airworthiness directive 2001–086(B),