alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-20511

Summary Calendar

Richard Vincent Letizia, 

Petitioner—Appellant,

versus

Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 

Correctional Institutions Division, 

Respondent—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CV-2834

Before Southwick, Graves, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Richard Vincent Letizia, Florida DOC # K69277, has applied for leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) for an appeal from the dismissal of his 

application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his confinement under a 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 25, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-20511 Document: 00516179666 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/25/2022
No. 20-20511

2

governor’s warrant for extradition to Florida. The district court determined

that the habeas application was moot. 

By moving this court for leave to proceed IFP, Letizia is challenging 

the district court’s determination that his appeal is not taken in good faith. 

Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). A motion for leave to 

proceed IFP on appeal “must be directed solely to the trial court’s reasons 

for the certification decision.” Id. This court’s inquiry into good faith “is 

limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits 

(and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 

1983) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). 

Letizia argues the merits of his constitutional claims only, and he 

makes no argument with respect to the district court’s determination that 

those claims have been mooted by his extradition to Florida. Letizia has not 

shown that his appeal involves a nonfrivolous issue. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 

202; Howard, 707 F.2d at 220. The motion for leave to proceed IFP on 

appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2; Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24.

Case: 20-20511 Document: 00516179666 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/25/2022
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Washington PARKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-15762

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 30, 2013.

Robert G. Davies, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Terry Flynn, Karen E. Rhew-Miller, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Pamela C. Marsh, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Gainesville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gwendolyn Louise Spivey, Randolph Patterson Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

George Washington Parker, Jr., Coleman, FL, pro se.

Before CARNES, BARKETT and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for George Washington Parker, Jr. in this appeal of the district court’s denial of Parker’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Parker’s § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
Clear All

        21 March 2024    

                    Bataan ARG, 26th MEU(SOC) Return from 8-month Deployment                 
                More than 4,000 Sailors and Marines assigned to the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and embarked 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) (MEU(SOC)) returned to Hampton Roads following an eight and a half-month deployment to the U.S. 2nd, 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operations,            

        05 August 2023    

                    USS Mesa Verde (LPD-19) Arrives in Narvik, Norway                 
                USS Mesa Verde (LPD-19), assigned to the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (ARG), and embarked 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) Special Operations Capable (SOC), arrived in Narvik, Norway for a scheduled port visit to enhance the U.S.-Norway relationship and demonstrate our continued commitment to            

        01 February 2012    

                    Bataan Amphibious Ready Group Returns from Deployment                 
                Nearly 2,000 Sailors aboard the ships of the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (BATARG) are scheduled to return to their homeports Tuesday, Feb. 7 following a 10 1/2-month deployment supporting operations in the U.S. Navy's 5th and 6th Fleets areas of responsibility            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 19 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 19 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 32 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 32 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### AMARYLLIS GRUSH *v.*CHRISTINE DADARRIA ET AL.

*Patrick J. Filan,*in support of the petition.

*Michael C. Deakin,*in opposition.

Decided February 1, 2005

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 25839) is denied.
Clear All

        06 February 2011    

                    Bold Alligator 2012 Tests Navy/Marine Ability to Execute and Control Long Range Sea to Shore Raid                 
                More than 150 Marines from the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (24th MEU) embarked with the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group will conduct a simulated air-toground assault raid against targets at Fort Pickett, Va., Feb. 7, as part of Bold Alligator 2012.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Deputy /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 19, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00316

- CV

BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION OF BEXAR COUNTY,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Tr ial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 14030

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The panel has considered the appellant's motion for rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH     Document 21      Filed 01/15/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH     Document 21      Filed 01/15/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH     Document 21      Filed 01/15/2008     Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 41 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 41 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 41 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 41 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 41 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 11 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 11 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
(85 South. 921)

#### Ex parte EICHBERG.

(1 Div. 141.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 12, 1920.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Xerger & Poster, of Mobile, for appellant.

Gordon & Edington, of Mobile, for appellee.

GARDNER, J.

Petition of M. H. Eichberg for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to. review and revise the judgment and decision of said court rendered in the case Of National Timber Company and M. H. Eichberg v. F. M. Deer, 84 South. 865. Writ denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23035-23036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Board on Medical Rehabilitation Research.

[[Page 23036]]

    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Board on Medical 
Rehabilitation Research.
    Date: May 24-25, 2001.
    Time: May 24, 2001, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: The agenda will include reports by the Director, NICHD 
and Director, NCMRR, update on NCMRR Training activities, discussion 
of the future of medical rehabilitation, and other business of the 
Board.
    Place: Holiday Inn, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 
20910.
    Time: May 25, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to adjournment.
    Agenda: Same as above.
    Place: Holiday Inn, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 
20910.
    Contact Person: Ralph M Nitkin, PhD. Director, BSCD, National 
Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Building, Room 2A03, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-4206.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 30, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-11395 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Clear All

        27 February 2023    

                    Carabiniere (F 593) Completes Operations with George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group                 
                MEDITERRANEAN SEA – The Italian Navy Carlo Bergamini-class frigate ITS Carabiniere (F 593) detached from the George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group (CSG), Feb. 14, 2023, after operating with the strike group throughout the month.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### SCHWANN et al., Respondents, v. CLARK, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

August 1, 1894.)

Action by John Frederick Schwann and others against George W. Clark. Parsons, Shepard *&*Ogden, for appellant. Hinrich J. Rudolph, for respondents.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied, with costs. See 29 N. Y. Supp. 289.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99

Statement Pursuant to Section 1350(a) of title 18, United States Code


The undersigned, Don R. Graber and Robert W. Lafferty, certify that:

1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Huffy Corporation (the "Company") for the
     Years Ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K"), which is being filed today
     with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
     requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
     of 1934.

2.   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



February 20, 2003                               /s/  Don R. Graber
------------------------                        -------------------------------
Date                                            Don R. Graber
                                                Chief Executive Officer,
                                                Huffy Corporation


February 20, 2003                               /s/ Robert W. Lafferty
-------------------------                       --------------------------------
Date                                            Robert W. Lafferty
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                Huffy Corporation
EXHIBIT 10.18





EXTENSION
AGREEMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


between Bruce E. Archinal (Executive) and


Pogo Producing Company, a Delaware corporation (Company),


dated effective February 1, 2002





WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an Executive Employment Agreement bearing an original Effective Date of
February 1, 1998; and





WHEREAS, February 1, 2002, (even date herewith) is hereby deemed to be the Renewal
Date in that Employment Agreement; and





WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said Executive
Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as to terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit January 31, 2004); and





WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and desires to induce Executive to remain in its employ for that extended time period; and





WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as an employee of Company for the period specified herein from and
after the date of this Extension Agreement; and





WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to enter into this Extension
Agreement in order to formally secure for Company the benefit of the experience and abilities of Executive, and to set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and Executive; and





WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been duly authorized and approved by all requisite corporate
action on the part of the Company.




---




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreements
herein contained, and in consideration of the sum of $10 paid by Company to Executive, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive and Company do hereby agree as follows:





1.    The Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company bearing an Effective Date of February 1, 1998 and a Renewal Date which
is deemed herein to be February 1, 2002, is hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing February 1, 2003 and ending January 31, 2004, unless such employment period is hereafter further extended for an additional period by both
Executive and Company.





2.    All provisions of the Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and
Company dated as of February 1, 1998, and as it is herein amended, are continued in full force and effect without change as if the Employment Agreement had been initially effective as of February 1, 2002.





POGO PRODUCING COMPANYBy:

/s/    JOHN O. MCCOY,
JR.John O. McCoy, Jr.Senior Vice President andChief Administrative Officer








ATTEST:  /s/    
JOEANN KINGDONAssistant Corporate Secretary





EMPLOYEE:/s/    BRUCE E. ARCHINALBruce E. Archinal Vice President and Onshore Division
Manager
#### H. D. STILL’S SONS v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF MACON et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

December 19, 1913.)

No. 1,157.

Petition to. Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Law, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina; Henry A. /Middleton Smith, Judge.

Application of the American National Bank of Macon against H. D. Still’s Sons, alleged bankrupts. On petition of the latter to superintend and revise in matter of law, an adjudication against them as bankrupts.

Petition dismissed, without prejudice.

S. G. Mayfield, of Denmark, S. C., and Chas. Carroll Simms, of Barnwell, S. C., for petitioners.

George S. Jones, of Macon, Ga., and William H. Fleming, of Augusta, Ga. (Jas. A. Willis and H. L. O’Bannon, both of Barnwell, S. C., W. H. Townsend, of Columbia, S. G., and James Simons and Julian Mitchell, both of Charleston, S. C., on the brief), for respondents.

Before PRITCHARD and KNAPP, Circuit Judges, and CONNOR, District Judge.

KNAPP, Circuit Judge.

As the decision of this court in No. 1,175, H. D. Still’s Sons v. American National Bank et al., 209 Fed. 749, will have the effect of securing to petitioners the relief sought in this proceeding, the petition herein will be dismissed without prejudice.
Richard S. Mills, Esq. (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson, Esq. (JPC-9391)

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE 

LITIGATION

21 MC 102 (AKH)

FABIO MORALES, 

 Plaintiff, -against- 100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL., 

 Defendants.

INDEX NO.: 07-CV-01667 (AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF AMBIENT 

GROUP, INC. S ANSWER

TO MASTER COMPLAINT

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., by its attorneys, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, as and for its Response to the allegations set forth 

in the Amended Complaint by Adoption (Amended Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master

Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, hereby adopts its Answer to Master Complaint 

dated August 2, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In Re World Trade Center Lower

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, the defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., demands judgment dismissing

the above-captioned action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such

other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Dated: New York, New York

Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 41 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

May 12, 2008 

Yours etc., 

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc. 

By:__ s/ John P. Cookson ___________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483.9490

TO: Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

(212) 267.3700

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

(212) 553.9206

James E. Tyrrell, Jr., Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza

Newark, New Jersey 07102

(973) 848.5600

Thomas A. Egan, Esq.

Fleming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006-1404

(212) 412.9500

Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 41 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 12th day of May 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER BY DEFENDANT AMBIENT GROUP, INC., 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which sends notification to 

appearing parties.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP

By: _s/ John P. Cookson ___________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 41 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Gaither, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), both rendered March 26, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 4703/85, and attempted robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 2430/86, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court should not have accepted his guilty plea on indictment No. 4703/85 without *588further inquiry into whether he was aware of his potential agency defense and was knowingly waiving it. Although the alleged error was properly preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666; *People v Cooks,*67 NY2d 100, 103, n 1), we find his contention in this regard to be without merit. We do not find that an agency defense was clearly suggested by the defendant’s factual recitation. Therefore, the plea allocution did not give rise to a duty on the part of the trial court to inquire further to ensure that the defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary *(see, People v Lopez, supra; People v Beasley,*25 NY2d 483, 487-488). Moreover, the record demonstrates that the plea allocution satisfied the basic requirements of *People v Harris*(61 NY2d 9). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH     Document 36      Filed 01/11/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH     Document 36      Filed 01/11/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH     Document 36      Filed 01/11/2008     Page 3 of 3