alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#                                                 Mr. Matthew H. Swartz                                                                                            

#### EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. Fleet Forces Command

14 October 2020

                Mr. Matthew H. Swartz            

                Mr. Matthew H. Swartz            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: U.S. Fleet Forces Command

VIRIN: 240209-A-KQ181-9999

Mr. Matthew Swartz serves as the executive director and chief of staff for U.S. Fleet Forces Command. Mr. Swartz assumed these duties in September 2019. As a direct report to the 4-star fleet commander, he is responsible for integrating resources and readiness fleet-wide, developing strategies to optimize utilization of more than $15 billion annually as well as 125,000 total active duty and reserve military members, civilian employees and contractors.

Prior to this assignment, Mr. Swartz served as the deputy commander, Naval Information Forces that is responsible for the man, train and equip functions for Navy information warfare (IW) and fleet C5ISR capabilities assigned to 80-plus subordinate operational shore commands manned by over 21,000 IW personnel operating across the globe. In the execution of his duties, he led a staff of 500-plus military and civilian professionals and directly managed an annual budget of $1.4 billion.

 

Mr. Swartz also served in multiple other federal senior executive positions. He served as the chief information officer (CIO) of the USDA Forest Service; the executive director and command information officer (CIO) for U.S. Fleet Cyber Command; and the director for assured command and control within the directorate of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (DCNO) Information Warfare (N2/N6). Also during this period, Mr. Swartz led the Chief of Naval Operations and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition (ASN (RDA)) Task Force chartered to define the Navy’s approach and response to cyber security.

In addition to these executive positions, Mr. Swartz has served as the deputy director, logistics planning and innovation for the DCNO for fleet readiness and logistics and as enterprise initiatives branch head for the DCNO for communication networks. Prior to government service, Mr. Swartz held executive and senior leadership roles in the commercial industry.

Mr. Swartz holds a bachelor's degree from Mary Washington College and master of science degrees from the University of Virginia and the National Defense University, Industrial College of the Armed Forces. He has received numerous awards to include a Presidential Rank Award, the Department of Navy Superior Civilian Service award (2), the Department of Navy Meritorious Civilian Service award, and the Department of Navy Information Management/Information Technology (IM/IT) Excellence Award.

Tags:
**Chief of Staff**USFFC**Executive director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      17,768,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,755,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,158,000
<INVENTORY>                                 79,013,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           147,188,300
<PP&E>                                      70,911,300
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,426,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             188,011,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,562,700
<BONDS>                                      2,851,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,671,300
<OTHER-SE>                                 163,259,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               188,011,900
<SALES>                                    187,776,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           187,776,900
<CGS>                                      146,907,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              146,907,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               894,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             578,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,772,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,280,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,883,800)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,883,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES A $5,280,000 LOSS ON THE SALE OF AN OTHER ASSET.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Clear All

        29 July 2022    

                    DESRON 22 Hosts Fleet Synthetic Training Exercise                 
                VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. - Commander, Destroyer Squadron 22 held a Theater Undersea Warfare Symposium and a digital fleet synthetic training (FST) exercise to coordinate homeland defense across multiple platforms at Naval Support Activity Oceana Dam Neck Annex, Virginia Beach, Virginia, and Naval Station            

        07 July 2022    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet holds Undersea Warfare Symposium                  
                The purpose of the Symposium is to provide clear commander’s intent, synchronize operational perspectives and expectations, and establish requirements for command and control in order to present a ready and credible force in response to adversary operations in Atlantic maritime avenues of approach.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-389-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 3, 2001.

    Take notice that on April 30, 2001, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 22, to be 
effective June 1, 2001.
    Natural states that the filing is submitted pursuant to Section 21 
of the General Terms and Conditions (GT&C) of its Tariff as the 
sixteenth semiannual limited rate filing under Section 4 of the Natural 
Gas Act and the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) promulgated thereunder. The rate adjustments 
filed for are designed to recover Account No. 858 stranded costs 
incurred by Natural under contracts for transportation capacity on 
other pipelines. Costs for any Account No. 858 contracts specifically 
excluded under Section 21 are not reflected in this filing.
    Natural requested waivers of Section 21 of the GT&C of its Tariff 
and the Commission's Regulations to the extent necessary to permit 
Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 22 to become effective June 1, 2001.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11668 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AMIN INGRAM,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 112 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-35539, No. 333-83842, No. 333-126981, No. 333-160627, No. 333-167903, No. 333-183464, No. 333-203142 and No. 333-206422) of Checkpoint Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 5, 2015, except with respect to our opinion on internal control over financial reporting insofar as it relates to the matter described in the third  paragraph of Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, as to which the date is November 3, 2015, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10K.








PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 3, 2015
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 11, 2014

No. 04-14-00242-CR

Rudy MENDEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2880

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case,

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record, however, does not contain a plea bargain, 

and instead shows that a jury trial was conducted, and that the jury decided both guilt/innocence and 

punishment. Therefore, the trial court certification does not accurately reflect that the defendant has the 

right to appeal and is defective. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires the record to contain the trial 

court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2). TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It 

further provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of 

appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id.

Accordingly, the trial court is ORDERED to prepare and file an amended trial court certification 

correcting the defect and showing that the criminal case is not a plea-bargain case, and that the defendant 

has the right to appeal. The trial court clerk is instructed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

the amended trial court certification in this Court within ten days from the date of this order. TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(f), (d); 34.5(c); 37.1. All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending resolution of the 

certification issue.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on 

this 11th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### SAXLEHNER *v.*SIEGEL-COOPER COMPANY. SAXLEHNER *v.*GIES. SAXLEHNER *v.*MARQUET.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. '

Nos. 30, 31, 32.

Argued March 22, 23, 1900.

Decided October 15, 1900.

These eases were argued with No. 29, *ante,*40. The answer in them was substantially the same as in that ease, and the same record of proofs was used. *Held*that an injunction should issue against' all the defendants, but as the Siegel-Cooper Company acted in good faith it should not be required to account for gains and profits.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Counsel were the same as in No. 29.

Me. Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

These three cases were brought against retail dealers, and defended by the Eisner and Mendelson Company, who imported and furnished- the defendants with the water sold by them. The bills charged the defendants generally with unlawfully selling bitter water under labels simulating Saxlehner’s blue and red label, and under the name “ Hunyadi.” The answer was substantially the same as that in the main case, and the same record of proofs was used.

In the case against the Siegel-Cooper Company there was no charge of an intentional fraud, and the court found there was no evidence of fraudulent conduct on its part, and dismissed the ■ bill as to that company. As to the other two cases the court found that the clerks in charge of their stores, in response to special requests for Janos water, wrapped up and delivered Matyas water purchased of the Eisner and Mendelson Company. In other words that they had palmed off the one for .the other.

We think that an injunction should issue against all these defendants, but that, as the Siegel-Cooper Company appears to *43have acted in good faith, and the sales of the others were small, they should not be required to account for gains and profits. The fact that the Siegel-Cooper Company acted innocently does not exonerate it from the charge of infringement. *Moet v. Couston,*33 Beav. 578; *Millington*v. *Fox,*3 Myl, *&*Cr. 338; *Edelsten*v. *Edelsten,*1 De Gex, J. & S. 185; Brown on Trade Marks, § 386.

*The deeree of the Circuit Court of Appeals in these cases are also reversed, and the cases rema/nded to the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York for further proceedings, etc.*
#### WALBER GONZALEZ *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*David B. Rozwaski,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Leon F. Dalbec, Jr.,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 21, 2005

The petitioner Walber Gonzalez’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 744 (AC 24073), is denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of One Horizon Group, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Brian Collins, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the
dates and for the periods indicated.



Date:   April 19, 2016



|/s/ Brian Collins                               | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|Brian Collins                                   | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Clear All

        16 November 2022    

                    Vice Chief of Naval Operations Visits Navy Submariners in Connecticut                 
                GROTON, Conn. – Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa M. Franchetti visited Submarine Force leaders at Naval Submarine Base New London in Groton, Connecticut, Nov. 16.            

        30 September 2022    

                    Vice Chief of Naval Operations Discusses Quality of Service and Readiness with Norfolk Leadership                  
                NORFOLK, Va. - Vice Chief of Naval Operations Lisa Franchetti visited multiple commands in Norfolk, Virginia, to meet with local military leadership, Sept. 30.            

        16 May 2022    

                    Naval Helicopter Association Symposium Focuses on Human Advantage in Evolution of Rotary Aircraft                 
                NORFOLK, Va. – The Naval Helicopter Association (NHA) held its annual symposium at the Marriott Norfolk Waterside Hotel, May 11-13, 2022, centered on how the human advantage strengthens Naval Aviation’s rotary wing community.On May 12, the first full day of programming, the event featured a Major            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

WLODZIMIERZ BELKOWSKI (and wife, TERESA 07-CV-5339 (AKH)

BELKOWSKI)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY

Plaintiffs, 100 CHURCH LLC OF

AMENDED ANSWER TO

-against- MASTER COMPLAINT

100 CHURCH LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant 100 CHURCH LLC (hereinafter 100

Church), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption

(Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action,

herein adopt 100 Churchs Amended Answer to Master Complaint dated August 30, 2007, which

was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation,

21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, 100 Church demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action

as against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: New York, New York

September 7, 2007

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

100 CHURCH LLC

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 687-0100

Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaint~ff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

All Other Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the following

document to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of 100 Church LLCs Adoption of Amended Answer to Master

Complaint.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintiffs

Dated: September 10, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, ~ Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

/5/

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
[EXHIBIT 31.2]




           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Jack Chien, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Med
Gen, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
     by others within those entities, particularly during the
     period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
     the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
     Date"); and

c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
     based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
     of internal controls which could adversely affect the
     registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
     financial data and have identified for the registrants
     auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
     or other employees who have a significant role in the
     registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  May 15th, 2006

By:  /s/Jack Chien
   ------------------------------------
   Jack Chien /Chief Financial Officer,
   and Principal Accounting Officer