alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Daniel Kramer, Petitioner, v New York State Racing and Wagering Board et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, dated January 4, 1988, which, after a hearing, confirmed a determination denying the petitioner’s 1987 application for a harness racing owner’s license.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The petitioner’s harness racing owner’s license was suspended following his indictment in 1985 in New Jersey and New York on gambling-related charges. In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging that suspension, this court confirmed the determination that the petitioner’s character and fitness were such that his continued participation in harness racing would be inconsistent with the best interest of racing *(see, Kramer v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd.,*119 AD2d 552). After disposition of the indictments in a manner that did not result in any criminal conyictions, the petitioner sought renewal of his license. That application was denied on character and fitness grounds in May 1987.

The petitioner demanded a hearing. At that hearing, a representative of the New York State Racing and Wagering Board (hereinafter the Board) presented evidence of the activities underlying the New York indictment, including tape-recorded conversations obtained pursuant to a law enforcement wiretap. Based in part on this evidence, and the petitioner’s testimony, the Board found that the petitioner had engaged in conversations related to betting on sports and horseracing events with individuals previously arrested for bookmaking activities, and confirmed the denial of his application for a license on character and fitness grounds (Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law § 309 [2]).

The Board did not err in considering evidence of the activities underlying the indictments in order to assess the petitioner’s character and fitness, even though the petitioner was not convicted of any crime *(see, Matter of Webster v Van Lindt,*117 AD2d 555). We find that the Board’s determination was supported by substantial evidence in the record *(see, Matter of Webster v Van Lindt, supra; Matter of Belanger v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd.,*99 AD2d 579). The Board’s regulations prohibit association by licensees with bookmakers and those engaged in similar pursuits (9 NYCRR 4119.7). Furthermore, the penalty imposed was not disproportionate to *607the offense *(see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222) in view of the Board’s obligation to assure the integrity of harness racing *(see, Bonacorsa v Van Lindt,*129 AD2d 518).

We find the petitioner’s remaining contentions to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: URIEL ANCHONDO,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00365-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator=s pro se petition for writ of mandamus 

against Norma Favela, the El Paso County District Clerk, El Paso, Texas, and concludes that 

Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the petition for 

writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Clear All

        07 October 2022    

                    USS Billings (Gold Crew) Returns Home After 4th Fleet Deployment                 
                MAYPORT, Fla. - The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Billings (LCS 15) Gold Crew returned to Mayport, Fla., Oct. 7th, following its second successful deployment to the U.S. 4th Fleet area of operations.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (the
         "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 as
         filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
         (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey P. Devaney, Chief Financial Officer of the
         Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
         pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
         knowledge:

               (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
               (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.

                                            By: /s/ Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                ----------------------
                                                Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                January 29, 2010
# CE2010117EN.01021801.xml

| 6.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 117/218 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 117/218

---

Tuesday 24 March 2009Wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2009)0147

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2009 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain components and characteristics of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (codified version) (COM(2008)0690 – C6-0414/2008 – 2008/0213(COD))

2010/C 117 E/36

(Codecision procedure – codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0690),

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0414/2008),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 – Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0130/2009),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-02-2000
<CASH>                                             677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                       201
<INVENTORY>                                     20,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,033
<PP&E>                                          20,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,830
<BONDS>                                         26,501
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,949
<SALES>                                        104,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,837
<CGS>                                           83,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (125)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,565
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,565
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .6


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 21 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS FROM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001045710
<NAME> FRONTIERVISION HOLDINGS, LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         416,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,213,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,159,781
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     963,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,213,773
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,837
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       361
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,212)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit (23)



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
MainStreet BankGroup Incorporated on Form S-8 (File No. 333-21723) of our report
dated January 17, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated  financial  statements
of MainStreet  BankGroup  Incorporated  as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for
each of the two years in the period ended  December  31,  1996,  which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.








Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Greensboro, North Carolina
March 18, 1997
#                                                                         Hybrid Fleet Campaign Event Evaluates Technology For Future Operations                                                                    

##### by USNAVSOUTH/4TH FLEET PUBLIC AFFAIRS

20 October 2023

                NAVAL STATION KEY WEST, Fla. (Oct. 11, 2023) Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti, center, receives a platform familiarization tour during the Navy's Hybrid Fleet event at Naval Station Key West, Oct. 11, 2023. The event aims to test various unmanned aerial and surface systems in order to strengthen and increase warfighter capabilities. Earlier this year, U.S. 4th Fleet was selected to operationalize 5th Fleet's innovative use of cutting-edge technology as part of a continuous campaign of learning. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Amanda R. Gray)            

                231011-N-UD469-2394            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Chief Petty Officer Amanda Gray

VIRIN: 231011-N-UD469-2394
# Learn to Take C.H.A.R.G.E. of Battery Safety

**Posted: Nov. 30, 2023**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - CRR

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

Firefighters and first responders can educate their communities about the potential fire risks of lithium-ion battery-powered devices with the Underwriters Laboratories’ Fire Safety Research Institute safety campaign: Take C.H.A.R.G.E. of Battery Safety.

## TakeC.H.A.R.G.E.of battery safety

                - C hoose certified products.
                - H andle with care.
                - A lways stay alert.
                - R ecycle properly.
                - G et out quickly.
                - E ducate others.

The campaign is focused on educating the public on how they can protect themselves and their property. The campaign is based at BatteryFireSafety.org, which features a toolbox for first responders with a set of downloadable materials to use in public education and interaction with local media. The site also includes a public service announcement and other free resources for the public and first responders.

 https://vimeo.com/884565314

This article is based on content in theNov. 30, 2023 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 6 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 6 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 20

- 00029

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360

- 596086

- 16

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack , JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### B.I. AND 

### R.A., C HILDREN2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On July 6, 2020, we notified appellant that h er brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for wan t of prosecution unless , within ten days, appellant filed with the

court a n appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response. Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : August 20, 2020
Clear All

        08 November 2022    

                    Families Join USS Wyoming Crew; Experience Life Aboard Ballistic-Missile Submarine                 
                KINGS BAY, Ga. - The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming Blue Crew (SSBN 742) temporarily gained 39 crew members, when family and friends embarked aboard the submarine for a tiger cruise, Oct. 21.            

        08 April 2022    

                    USS Alaska Takes Trophy 5th Time in Decade                 
                The crews of the Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Alaska (SSBN 732) were recently announced as the recipients of the 2021 U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) Omaha Trophy.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-13 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-13 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-13 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
AMRESCO, INC.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements No. 333-57635, No. 333-62145
and No. 333-63543 on Form S-3 and Registration
Statements No. 333-62143 and No. 333-66989 on Form S-8
of our report dated February 9, 1999, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMRESCO, INC. for the
year ended December 31, 1998.


\S\  Deloitte & Touche LLP


Dallas, Texas

March 25, 1999
#                                                                         Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group 2 Hosts Groundbreaking of EOD and Navy Diver Memorial                                                                    

##### by Lt. Brittany Stephens

22 August 2022VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. -- 

                220819-N-YR675-9720 VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (Aug. 19, 2022). Suzanna Fisher, executive director at Navy Special Operations Foundation, Navy Diver Seaman Chris Pedrini, and Henry Thrift, president of Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Association, dig during the groundbreaking ceremony for the Navy Special Operations Memorial. The memorial will be located at the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group (EODGRU) 2 compound on Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story, and the memorial will feature the names of fallen Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians and Navy Divers. EODGRU 2 is a critical part of the Navy Expeditionary Combat Force (NECF) that clears explosive hazards to provide access to denied areas; secures the undersea domain for complete freedom of maneuver; builds and fosters relationships with a constellation of capable and trusted partners; and protects the homeland and American way of life. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. Brittany Stephens/Released)            

                220819-N-YR675-9720            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Lt. Brittany Stephens

VIRIN: 220819-N-YR675-9729

Tags:
**NECC**EOD Memorial**EODMU 2**eod**Navy Diver**NECF**USFF

Terms:
**Navy Family**Outreach**NECC
(85 South. 923)

#### Ex parte PATTERSON.

(5 Div. 751.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 12, 1920.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Petition for certiorari on behalf of E. M. Patterson.

Writ denied.

For opinion below, see Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Patterson, 12 Ala. App. 369, 68 South. 513.

Frank H. De Graffenried, of Seale, for appellant.

G.'L. Comer, of Eufaula, for appellee.

BROWN, J.

The writ of certiorari in this case is denied, on the authority of Postal Telegraph Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 South. 91. Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                     Page 83

                       Independent Auditor's Report

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
TODAY'S BANCORP, INC.
Freeport, Illinois

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, cash flows
and changes in capital, of TODAY'S BANCORP, INC. and subsidiaries for the year
ended December 31, 1993.  These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated results of TODAY'S BANCORP, INC and
subsidiaries' operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1993, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note One to the financial statements, the Company changed its
method of accounting for certain investment securities at December 31, 1993.

                                        /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Rockford, Illinois
January 24, 1994
Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2