alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCWC

- 13

- 0003629

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

KIMBERLY A. PASCO , Respondent/Petitioner

- Appellant,

vs.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE EMPLOYEES’ RETIR EMENT SYSTEM ,

Petitioner/Respondent

- Appellee

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 13

- 0003629; CIV. NO. 12

- 1

- 3294)

ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: McKenna, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court, filed

May 22, 2018, is corrected as follows:

T he attorney credits on page 29 shall be revised to read as

follows:

Robert H. Thomas (Edmund L. Lee, Jr. with him on the briefs) for petitioner

Brian P. Aburano (Patricia Ohara with him on the briefs) for respondent

This order of correction shall supersede the order of

correction filed by this court on May 29, 2018. The Clerk of

the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the

publ ishing agencies of this change

. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, Jun e 4 , 2018.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Associate Justice Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0003629 04-JUN-2018 10:38 AM
# C_2009133EN.01000901.xml

| 12.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/9

---

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/39.402 — RWE Gas Foreclosure (1)

1

2009/C 133/07

The draft Decision presented to the Commission under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (2) relates to certain practices of RWE. The allegations concern (i) inefficient capacity management of RWE's network and hoarding/understatement of capacity on RWE's network and (ii) margin squeeze.

2

The Commission opened proceedings with a view to taking a decision under chapter III on 20 April 2007 and adopted a preliminary assessment as referred to in Article 9(1) on 15 October 2008. Ensuing discussions with the Commission services led RWE to submit commitments on 26 November 2008. The commitments essentially consist of the divestiture of RWE's current German gas transmission system business as well as auxiliary equipment and intangible assets necessary for the operation of the transmission network.

On 5 December 2008, the Commission published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, pursuant to Article 27(4), summarizing the concerns and the commitments and inviting interested third parties to transmit observations on this notification within one month of its publication. The market test confirmed the appropriateness and proportionality of the proposed commitments. Several comments suggested improvements of technical details. RWE submitted revised commitments on 2 February 2009 which took into account all the suggested improvements.

Official Journal of the European Union

The Commission has now come to the conclusion that, in view of the commitments proposed by RWE, and without prejudice to Article 9(2), the proceedings should be brought to an end.

On 2 February 2009, RWE has submitted a declaration to the Commission that it has received sufficient access to the information it considered necessary to propose commitments in order to meet the concerns expressed by the Commission.

In the light of the above, I consider that the right to be heard has been respected in this case.

Brussels, 6 March 2009.

Michael ALBERS

---

(1)  Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision (2001/462/EC, ECSC) of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21.

1

(2)  In the following, all Articles and chapters referred to are those of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

2

---
Clear All

        14 December 2022    

                    OUT WITH THE OLD, IN WITH THE NEW ... RADIOS!                 
                Over the past year, as a part of an ongoing, proactive effort to provide and sustain a safe environment for all of naval aviation, Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic (CNAL) recently helped replace flight line radios for Strike Fighter Wing Atlantic (SFWL).             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Clear All

        02 February 2024    

                    U.S. Navy Installations, Fleet Commands Participate in Annual Force Protection Exercise                 
                WASHINGTON - Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) and Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC) will conduct their annual two-part force protection exercise, Citadel Shield-Solid Curtain (CS-SC24), beginning Feb. 5 at all Navy installations located in the continental United States.            

        03 February 2023    

                    USFF and CNIC to Conduct Annual Force Protection Training Exercise at CONUS Installations                 
                WASHINGTON, D.C. - Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) and Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC), will conduct their annual two-part force protection exercise, Citadel Shield-Solid Curtain (CSSC23), Feb. 6-17, 2023 at all Navy installations in the continental United States.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF THE


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Peter
J. Bergmann, the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer of YP Corp.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of YP Corp.





Date:
      February 10, 2005
    */s/
      Peter J. Bergmann*Peter
      J. BergmannChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer







I, W.
Chris Broquist, the Chief Financial Officer of YP Corp., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of YP Corp.





Date:
      February 10, 2005
    */s/
      W. Chris Broquist*W.
      Chris BroquistChief
      Financial Officer
Texas Mineral Resources Corp. 10-K 



 


 


Exhibit 10.11


 


Summary of Verbal Employment Arrangement


 


The Company pays Wm. Chris Mathers, our
chief financial officer, a salary of $60,000 per year.


 




    52
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 869 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Scott Reed Federal Building and United 

States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 869 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

3 located at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Scott Reed Federal 

5 Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Scott 

11 Reed Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Cecilia Meade, Plaintiff, v Fair Oaks Development Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Armor Elevator Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

*545—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered February 3, 1988, as granted the third-party defendant’s motion for a preclusion order to the extent of directing the defendant third-party plaintiff to serve further responses to questions 2 and 5 of the third-party defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is modified, by adding a provision thereto that if the defendant third-party plaintiff presently lacks sufficient knowledge to further respond to questions 2 and 5 of the third-party defendant’s demand, it should so state under oath and thereafter promptly serve a further response upon the third-party defendant if and when the requisite knowledge is acquired; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the defendant third-party plaintiff’s time to serve its further responses or to state under oath that it lacks sufficient knowledge with respect to the demanded information is extended until . 20 days after service upon it of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

Contrary to the defendant third-party plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err, as a matter of law, by directing further responses to questions 2 and 5 of the third-party defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars. We note that question 5 requires the identification of the specific elevator parts claimed to be defective and the particularization of the nature of the defect claimed as to each part *(see, Ferrigno v General Motors Corp.,*134 AD2d 479, 480-481). To the extent that the defendant third-party plaintiff lacks knowledge to furnish the further responses to questions 2 and 5, it should state so under oath and thereafter promptly serve a further response upon the third-party defendant "if and when [it] acquire[s] the knowledge” *(see, Ferrigno v General Motors Corp., supra,*at 481). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
***EXHIBIT21***

 

***POGO PRODUCINGCOMPANY***

 

***SUBSIDIARIES***

 

ArchPetroleum Inc. (Delaware corporation)

B8/32Partners Ltd. (Thailand limited company)

CavalloGathering Company, LLC (Texas limited liability company)

Countertrey,Inc. (Delaware corporation)

NorthCentral Oil Corporation (Delaware corporation)

PogoDenmark ApS (Danish limited liability company)

PogoEnergy, Inc. (Texas corporation)

PogoHungary Oil and Gas Exploration and Exploitation Limited Liability Company(Hungarian limited liability company)

Pogo NewZealand (New Zealand limited liability company)

PogoNorth Sea Limited (United Kingdom corporation)

PogoOffshore Pipeline Co. (Delaware corporation)

PogoOnshore Pipeline Company (Delaware corporation)

PogoOverseas Production B.V. (Netherlands private company with limited liability)

PogoPanhandle 2004, L.P. (Texas limited partnership)

PogoPartners, Inc. (Texas corporation)

PogoProducing (San Juan) Company (Texas corporation)

PogoProducing (Texas Panhandle) Company (Texas corporation)

PogoServices and Technology Company (Delaware corporation)

PonzeaB.V. (Netherlands private limited liability company)

Sampack,Inc. (Delaware corporation)

TantawanServices, LLC (Delaware limited liability company)

ThailandFinance Company (Delaware corporation)

ThaipoLimited (Thailand limited company)

VanApeldoorn Crystal Holding B.V. (Netherlands private company with limitedliability)

 

----
Preventing Arson at 

Construction Sites

Awareness is key. Everyone can help to prevent arson at 

construction sites.

First responders/Inspectors:

 If there has been negative press about the project, remind workers to be vigilant on the 

job site.

Make unannounced inspections to assess the project, activities and the job site.

 Perform site planning and preplanning throughout the building process.

Invite surrounding fire departments/companies to assist in the pre-fire plan.

 Take photos of anything you believe is a potential hazard and inform the job site 

manager. 

For more information:

The National Association of State Fire Marshals offers free construction fire safety 

online training courses:

ĵ First Responders.

ĵ Building Inspector Fire Safety Course.

ĵ Overview for Safety Managers and Owners.

ĵ Construction Workers Fire Safety Course. 

Visit www.constructionfiresafety.training to enroll.

Visit www.usfa.fema.gov/aaw for more information.
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Abdou-Malik Yacoubou ADAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-2466.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 26, 2013.

Decided: May 17, 2013.

Abdou-Malik Yacoubou Adam, Appellant Pro Se. Michael S. Barranco, Treanor, Pope & Hughes, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abdou-Malik Yacoubou Adam appeals the district court’s final order entered in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Adam v. Wells Fargo Bank,*No. l:09-cv-02387-ELH (D. Md. filed Sept. 28, 2012 & entered Oct. 1, 2012). We also conclude that, contrary to Yacoubou’s assertions, the district court did not prevent him from participating in discovery and that his Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection was not violated. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Megadata Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
P. Devaney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                            By:  /s/ Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                 -------------------------
                                                 Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 January 29, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BARON
CAPITAL TRUST FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          78,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  265,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               344,376
<PP&E>                                       7,562,377
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,283,080)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,202,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          334,771
<BONDS>                                      4,404,810
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,389,503
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,926,539)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,202,545
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259,151
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               687,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (400,138)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (400,136)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)


</TABLE>