alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. 
 8000
Marina Boulevard, Suite 300 
 Brisbane, CA 94005 

December 19, 2019 
 Stephen G. Dilly, M.B.B.S., Ph.D. 

8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 300 
 Brisbane, California 94005 

Dear Stephen: 
 As we have discussed, we are excited to offer
you an extension to the term of your employment with Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on the terms described in this letter. As you know, on November 5, 2017, you and the Company entered into a Transition and
Separation Agreement that was amended in December 2018 and June 2019 (as so amended, the “Agreement”) under which you are employed as Special Advisor to the Company. Under the Agreement, as amended, your part-time employment with
the Company is scheduled to end on December 31, 2019 (the “Employment End Date”). However, as we have discussed, we would like to extend the Planned Resignation Date to June 30, 2020. If you accept this extension, your
current base salary will remain $12,000 per annum (your “Existing Salary”) and your outstanding equity awards continue to vest in accordance with their original terms. 

If you are in agreement with the extension described in this letter, please indicate your acceptance of the terms of this letter by your signature below, and
return it to me at your earliest convenience. Upon your signature to this letter, the Agreement will be deemed amended to reflect a Planned Resignation Date of June 30, 2020. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement will not be affected
by this letter. 
 Sincerely, 

 

			
	AIMMUNE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Douglas T. Sheehy

		 	Douglas T. Sheehy
		 	General Counsel & Secretary


  

	
	Accepted and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ Stephen G. Dilly

	Stephen G. Dilly, M.B.B.S., Ph.D.
	
	Date: 12/19/2019
Clear All

        15 January 2021    

                    San Antonio, Carter Hall Receive COVID-19 Vaccine Pierside                 
                Sailors and Marines aboard the amphibious transport dock ship USS San Antonio (LPD 17) received their first doses of the COVID-19 vaccine Jan. 11 while pierside at Naval Station Norfolk, marking the first time a large group of personnel received vaccines outside of a Military Treatment Facility            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
NO. 07-07 -030 3-CV IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B OC TOBER2, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ GARY ZARS D BA GARY’S POOL AND PAT IO ST ORE, APP ELL ANT V. JER EM YAN D BRAN DI BR OW NLO W , AP PELLEE S

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE COU NT Y COUR T AT LA W OF HAYS CO UNT Y; NO . 887 7- C; H ON ORABLE HO W AR D S. W AR NE R, JU DG E

_________

_________

_________

____ Bef ore QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
ON NOTICE OF FILING B A NKRUPTCY
On Se pte mb er 27, 2 007 , app ellant Gary Zars f iled a Notice of Fili ng Bankrup tcy in thi s a ppeal

. A c opy

of his No ti ce o f Bankr uptc y C ase Fi li ng i n the U nit ed St ates Bank ru ptc y

C our t for the W est er n Div is ion of T ex as w as attac hed t o the noti ce, i ndi cat ing that t h e b a n k r u p t c y c a s e w a s fi l e d w i t h t h e b a n k r u p t c y c o u rt o n o r a b o u t S e p t e mb e r 18, 2007.
Pursua n t t o T exas Rule of Appe llate Proce dure 8, this ap pea l is suspe nde d un til further order of thi s c our

t. The par

ti es ar e di re cte d to adv is e the cler k of thi s c our t of any2

chang e i n the status of

appell ant Gar

y Z ars’ bank ru ptc y

proceed ing w hic h w oul d aff ectthe statu s of this app eal, inclu ding but no t limited to the f iling of a Motion to Reinstat e. T ex. R

. App. P. 8 .3.
It is so order ed.
Pe r C ur i am
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1651 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1651

To authorize assistance to be provided under certain rural development 
 programs for the establishment or expansion of animal care facilities 
                or veterinary practices in rural areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2019

 Mr. Fortenberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize assistance to be provided under certain rural development 
 programs for the establishment or expansion of animal care facilities 
                or veterinary practices in rural areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Returning Essential Rural Veterinary 
Animal Care Act'' or the ``RE-VAC Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR ASSISTANCE TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CERTAIN RURAL 
              DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION 
              OF ANIMAL CARE FACILITIES OR VETERINARY PRACTICES IN 
              RURAL AREAS.

    (a) Community Facilities Loans and Grants.--Section 306(a) of the 
Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1926(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(27) Community facility direct loans and grants for 
        establishment or expansion of animal care facilities or 
        veterinary practices in rural areas.--The Secretary may provide 
        community facility direct loans and grants under paragraphs 
        (1), (19), (20), and (21) for the establishment or expansion of 
        an animal care facility or a veterinary practice in a rural 
        area. The Secretary may not deny such a loan or grant to an 
        entity otherwise eligible for the loan or grant on the basis 
        that any facility constructed using the loan or grant will be 
        used by a for-profit entity.''.
    (b) Rural Economic Development Loans and Grants.--Section 313B(a) 
of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 (7 U.S.C. 940c-2(a)) is 
amended by at the end the following: ``A project designed to establish 
or expand an animal care facility or a veterinary practice in a rural 
area shall be eligible for a grant or loan under this section. The 
Secretary may not deny such a grant or loan to an entity otherwise 
eligible for the grant or loan on the basis that any facility 
constructed using the grant or loan will be used by a for-profit 
entity.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 19-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000225775
<NAME>                   PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                             US
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                          2,440,000
<SECURITIES>                                    9,211,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     423,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,074,000
<PP&E>                                         20,685,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (10,017,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,742,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             276,000
<BONDS>                                        26,338,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (3,872,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22,742,000
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,774,000
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,299,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  879,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,898,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,698,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,698,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,698,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       42.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       42.00
        

</TABLE>
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

LUIS F. MESA and MARIA MESA,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-05303-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 26 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 13, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-05303-AKH Document 26 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TORULE 13a – 14(a)**

I, Stephen W. Bershad, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis Form 10-K of Axsys Technologies, Inc.

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.                  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.                 Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

c.                  Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a.                  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and

b.                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| February 23, 2005                |
|---------------------------------------|
| /s/ STEPHEN W. BERSHAD |   |
| Stephen W. Bershad                    |
| *Chief Executive Officer*             |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 771 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 771

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 
  waiting period for divorced spouse's benefits following the divorce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2009

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 
  waiting period for divorced spouse's benefits following the divorce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TWO-YEAR WAITING PERIOD FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE'S 
              BENEFITS FOLLOWING THE DIVORCE IN CASES OF PRIOR RECEIPT 
              OF SPOUSE'S BENEFITS.

    (a) Wife's Insurance Benefits.--Section 202(b)(4)(A) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(b)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ``divorced 
wife--'' and all that follows through ``shall be entitled'' and 
inserting ``divorced wife meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 
through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled''.
    (b) Husband's Insurance Benefits.--Section 202(c)(4)(A) of such Act 
(42 U.S.C. 402(c)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ``divorced husband--'' 
and all that follows through ``shall be entitled'' and inserting 
``divorced husband meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through 
(D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled''.
    (c) Exemption From Deductions on Account of Work.--Section 
203(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 403(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2)(A) Except as'' and all that follows 
        through ``the benefit to which'' and inserting the following: 
        ``(2) In any case in which any of the other persons referred to 
        in paragraph (1)(B) is entitled to monthly benefits as a 
        divorced spouse under subsection (b) or (c) of section 202 for 
        any month, the benefit to which''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with respect to 
benefits for months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Clear All

        07 July 2022    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet holds Undersea Warfare Symposium                  
                The purpose of the Symposium is to provide clear commander’s intent, synchronize operational perspectives and expectations, and establish requirements for command and control in order to present a ready and credible force in response to adversary operations in Atlantic maritime avenues of approach.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
A91A1285, A91A1286.

#### CORIM, INC. v. BELVIN et al.; and vice versa.

(422 SE2d 676)

Decided September 8, 1992.

*Geiger & Pierce, James N. Geiger,*for appellant.

*Byrd & Anthony, Garland T. Byrd, Walker, Hulbert, Gray & Byrd, David G. Walker, James C. Marshall,*for appellees.

*Martin, Snow, Grant & Napier, Edward J. Harrell,*amicus curiae.

Cooper, Judge.

The Supreme Court of Georgia in *Crossroads Bank of Ga. v. Corim, Inc.,*262 Ga. 364 (418 SE2d 601) (1992), having reversed this Court’s prior judgments in these cases, 202 Ga. App. 396 (414 SE2d 491) (1991), the judgments of this Court are vacated, and the judgments of the trial court are hereby affirmed.

*Judgments affirmed.*

*Birdsong, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.*
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 16 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 16 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 16 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6237 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6237

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1351 2nd Street in Napa, California, as the ``Tom Kongsgaard Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOM KONGSGAARD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1351 2nd Street in Napa, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Tom Kongsgaard Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tom 
Kongsgaard Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6237

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1351 2nd Street in Napa, California, as the ``Tom Kongsgaard Post 
                           Office Building''.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hezekiah Wenstley, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On this appeal from a conviction of *1001driving while intoxicated as a felony, we reject defendant’s contention that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel principally because his counsel failed to object to the introduction into evidence of the certificate of conviction offered by the prosecutor to prove that defendant had been previously convicted of driving while intoxicated. Contrary to defendant’s assertion, the certificate indicates that defendant was convicted of driving while intoxicated, not driving while ability impaired. The fact that the certificate shows that defendant’s license was suspended rather than revoked indicates only that the court may have failed to comply with the provision of law for mandatory revocation of defendant’s license, not that the conviction was for driving while ability impaired. The methods provided by CPL 60.60 of proving a prior conviction are not exclusive and the judgment of conviction could be proven by other competent proof, including the original court records *(see, People v McIntyre,*99 Mise 17, 21). A judgment of conviction consists of the entry of a plea of guilty or a verdict of guilty together with the sentence imposed thereon and is completed by imposition and entry of the sentence (CPL 1.20 [15]). Here, the City Court Judge who accepted defendant’s plea and imposed sentence thereon produced his original notes and testified that defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of driving while intoxicated and that he imposed sentence on that plea. This evidence, even in the absence of the certificate of conviction, was sufficient to prove defendant’s prior conviction of driving while intoxicated.

The court was not required to submit to the jury the lesser included offense of driving while ability impaired because neither party so requested it *(see,*CPL 300.50 [2]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the prosecutor to use convictions in 1966 to impeach defendant’s credibility. Those convictions were highly probative of defendant’s credibility, defendant was incarcerated on those convictions for a lengthy period and he continued to commit crimes after his release from incarceration.

In view of defendant’s extensive criminal record, defendant’s sentence of lVá to 4 years was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Contiguglia, J. — felony driving while intoxicated.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.,
Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 2 of 2