alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 2 of 6

Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 3 of 6

Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 4 of 6

Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 5 of 6

Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 6 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 42 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Elvin Ramos, Appellant, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, Matter of Crutchfield v Kelly,*125 AD2d 955, *Iv denied*69 NY2d 608). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05359-AKH Document 14 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05359-AKH Document 14 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7794

NATHANIEL L. GAITHER, a/k/a Nathaniel Gaither,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (5:13-cv-00108-RMG)

Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel L. Gaither, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel L. Gaither seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his motions to recuse the magistrate 

judge, to transfer the case to a district court judge, and 

accepting the magistrate judge’s ruling denying his motion to 

compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Gaither seeks to appeal 

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 03, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 03, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0253. ACADIA HEALTHCARE COMPANY, INC. d/b/a BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAIN RECOVERY CENTER v. CHEROKEE COUNTY, GEORGIA, ITS BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15CV1843
#### *In re*TRIPLETT, Austin Henry

(MR 21016)

Chicago, IL

*713Order of the Court:

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent Austin Henry Triplett is disbarred.
Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05344-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION
  
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002I, Jameson Rose, certify that:1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Western Media Group Corporation;2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); andc)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and6.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: April __, 2004
/s/ Jameson RoseJameson
Rose, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-239-002]

Take notice that on April 27, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, Tenth Revised Tariff Sheet No. 316. Tennessee requests that the foregoing tariff sheet be made effective April 1, 2001, in compliance with the Commission's previous order.

Tennessee states that this sheet is being filed to comply with the Commission's Letter Order issued on March 28, 2001 in Docket No. RP01-239-000, requiring Tennessee to further clarify the priority of Extended Delivery Service/Extended Receipt Service for the NET-284 Rate Schedule.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections                           ( print page 23693)                        385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11649 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Stewart, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), rendered November 30, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and a new trial is ordered before a different Supreme Court Justice.

While most of the errors complained of were properly preserved for appellate review, some were not. However, under the circumstances of this case, we feel compelled to reach them in the interest of justice and to reverse the judgment of conviction *(People v Ortiz,*125 AD2d 502; *People v Hamilton,*121 AD2d 176).

The trial was marked by the prosecutor’s efforts, even over sustained objections, to characterize the defendant as an individual predisposed to commit the crime charged. Although proof of a prior crime may be introduced under certain circumstances *(People v Molineux,*168 NY 264; *People v Allweiss,*48 NY2d 40, 46-47), and may be the subject of cross-examination insofar as it relates to credibility *(People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371), it may not be offered, or argued in summation, as illustrative of a criminal propensity *(People v Maddox,*138 AD2d 749).

Contrary to the People’s contention, there was also a violation of the rule against collateral impeachment. Under that *707concept, testimony that merely contradicts a witness on a collateral point is improper rebuttal *(People v Ramos,*139 AD2d 775; *People v Booker,*134 AD2d 949). What is collateral "must be determined under the particular circumstances of each case; no general principle can be laid down” *(People v Gonzalez,*100 AD2d 852, 853; *People v Harris,*57 NY2d 335, *cert denied*460 US 1047). The rebuttal testimony at bar related to the defendant’s employment, whether or not he received welfare, and whether he lived with his girlfriend or with his mother. Under the facts of this case, these were collateral issues.

Standing alone, the introduction of this rebuttal proof might, as the People suggest, be susceptible to harmless error analysis *(e.g., People v Brown,*126 AD2d 657), but we conclude that the cumulative effect of the errors compromised the defendant’s right to a fair trial.

Finally, because of the comments of the Trial Judge as to the credibility of the complainant we direct that the retrial take place before another Justice. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - 21st Century Sailor and Marine 
                            - Aircraft 
                            - Awards and Recognition 
                            - Biographies 
                            - Biographies 
                            - Chief of Naval Operations 
                            - Christening 
                            - Commissioning 
                            - Community Outreach 
                            - Current Readiness 
                            - Diversity 
                            - Energy Savings Initiative 
                            - Environmental Initiative 
                            - Environmental Stewardship 
                            - Family Readiness 
                            - Fleet of the Future 
                            - Future Readiness 
                            - Global Operations 
                            - Health and Fitness 
                            - Home Slideshow 
                            - Humanitarian Operations 
                            - Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy 
                            - Morale, Welfare and Recreation 
                            - Navy Casualty  
                            - Navy History and Heritage 
                            - Navy Medicine 
                            - Navy Reserve 
                            - Operation Enduring Freedom 
                            - Other 
                            - Pay and Benefits 
                            - Piracy 
                            - Ready, Relevant Learning 
                            - Research 
                            - Safety 
                            - SAPR 
                            - Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics 
                            - Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 
                            - Ships 
                            - STEM 
                            - Training and Education 
                            - Uniform Matters 
                            - Wounded Warrior 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

240112-O-TX341-1105.JPGPhoto By: U.S. Fleet Forces Command

Norfolk, Va. - VADM Gumbleton Deputy Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces CommandDOWNLOAD PHOTO(1.27 MB)                This photograph is considered public domain and has been cleared for release. If you would like to republish please give the photographer appropriate credit. Further, any commercial or non-commercial use of this photograph or any                other DoD image must be made in compliance with guidance found at            http://www.dimoc.mil/resources/limitations.html                , which pertains to                intellectual property restrictions (e.g., copyright and trademark, including                the use of official emblems, insignia, names and slogans), warnings                regarding use of images of identifiable personnel, appearance of                endorsement, and related matters.            Back to Gallery
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60735 Summary Calendar

__________________

VIBERT BRENTNOL ROSS, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

A34-717-083

- - - - - - - - - - September 3, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Vibert B. Ross, a Guyanan citizen, asserts that the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") erred in summarily dismissing his application for waiver of deportation, filed pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in dismissing his appeal for failure to file an appellate brief. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(d)(1-a)(i)(E); Medrano-Villatoro v. INS , 866 F.2d 132, 134 (5th Cir. 1989). Ross has failed to demonstrate that his counselNo. 95-60735 -2- was ineffective for failing to file such brief, because he has not shown prejudice. See Miranda-Lores v. INS , 17 F.3d 84, 85 (5th Cir. 1994). The petition for review is DENIED. Ross’ “Motion to Amend and Addendum” is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners of War, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners 
of War will be held on April 30 through May 2, 2001, at the Washington, 
DC, Headquarters of The American Legion, Room 700, 1608 K Street NW, 
Washington DC. Each day the meeting will convene at 9 a.m. and end at 
4:30 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of benefits under Title 38, United States 
Code, for veterans who are former prisoners of war, and to make 
recommendations on the needs of such veterans for compensation, health 
care and rehabilitation.
    The agenda for April 30th will begin with an introduction of 
committee members and dignitaries, a review of Committee reports, an 
update of activities since the last meeting, and a period for POW 
veterans and/or the public to address the committee. The Committee will 
also reveiw the Secretary's response to the April and October, 2000, 
report of meeting, and receive presentations on Veterans Benefits 
Administration and Veterans Health Administration activities, as well 
as on the One VA POW Learning Seminars. The agenda on May 1 will 
include an update on VA long term health care, a report from the Center 
on POW Studies, an update by the National Institute of Health on the 
follow-up report on morbidity and mortality among POWs and a report on 
the development of the Data Merge project as a follow-up to the 
findings of the Expert Panel on Stroke. The committee will also take up 
consideration of priority for POWs in long-term Health Care programs 
and other issues. On May 2, the Committee's Medical and Administrative 
working committees will break out to discuss their activities and 
report back to the Committee.
    Additionally, the Committee will review and analyze the comments 
discussed throughout the meeting for the purpose of assisting and 
compiling a final report to be sent to the Secretary.
    Members of the public may direct questions or submit prepared 
statements for review by the Committee in advance of the meeting, in 
writing only, to Mr. John F. McCourt, Acting Director, Compensation and 
Pension Service (21), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420. Submitted materials must be received 
by April 20, 2001. A report of the meeting and roster of Committee 
members may be obtained from Mr. McCourt.

    Dated: April 10, 2001.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Ventris C. Gibson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10954 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Clear All

        17 July 2022    

                    USS Nitze Departs on Deployment                 
                NORFOLK, Va. (July 17, 22) – Nearly 360 Sailors aboard guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) departed Naval Station Norfolk on a scheduled independent deployment, July 17.            

        06 July 2022    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet participates in Operation Noble Defender                 
                NORFOLK, Va. (June 30, 2022) – U.S. 2nd Fleet participated in North American Aerospace Defense (NORAD) Command’s latest iteration of Operation Noble Defender, June 27-30.            

        19 March 2021    

                    Winston S. Churchill Returns to Homeport after 9-month Deployment                 
                The guided-missile destroyer USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81) returned to homeport in Naval Station Norfolk March 19, after nearly nine months deployed in the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operation.            

        15 January 2021    

                    San Antonio, Carter Hall Receive COVID-19 Vaccine Pierside                 
                Sailors and Marines aboard the amphibious transport dock ship USS San Antonio (LPD 17) received their first doses of the COVID-19 vaccine Jan. 11 while pierside at Naval Station Norfolk, marking the first time a large group of personnel received vaccines outside of a Military Treatment Facility            

        01 October 2020    

                    CJOS COE Transfers from USFF to C2F                 
                Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence (CJOS COE), a NATO-accredited, multi-national military think tank, transferred directorship from the deputy commander of U.S. Fleet Forces Command to commander, U.S.  2ndFleet (C2F), Oct. 1.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website