alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010354EN.01006701.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/67

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down a Scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the area covered by the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic fisheries’

COM(2009) 151 final — 2009/0051 (CNS) (1)

1

2010/C 354/12

The Council and the European Parliament decided on 18 January 2010 and 5 March 2010, respectively, to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex Article 37 of the Treaty establishing the European Community), on the

Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down a Scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the area covered by the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic fisheries

Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down a Scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the area covered by the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic fisheries

COM(2009) 151 final — 2009/0051 (CNS) (1).

1

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 461st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 March 2010 (meeting of 17 March 2010), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 17 March 2010.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---

(1)  The acronym should read COD.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20821-20822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: April 24, 2001.
    Time: 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 am.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6000 Executive Blvd., Rm. 409, Rockville, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sean O'Rourke, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol

[[Page 20822]]

Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Suite 409, 6000 
Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-2861.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding 
cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Center Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: April 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10200 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### GUARANTY STATE BANK & TRUST CO. v. OKLAHOMA COAL CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 1, 1913.)

No. 2,568.

Banks and Banking (§ 138*)—Unauthorized Payment of Checks—Liability to Depositor.

A bank *held,*liable to a corporation depositor for the amount of checks paid which were drawn without the authority of the corporation.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Banks and Banking, Cent. Dig. §§ 398-405; Dec. Dig. § 138.*]

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Edward R. Meek, Judge.

Action at law by the Oklahoma Coal Company against the Guaranty State Bank & Trust Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

W. T. Henry, of Dallas, Tex., for appellant..

Joseph Manson McCormick, of Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and CALL, District Judge.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Ttep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

In the court below the trial judge directed a peremptory verdict for the plaintiff.

We have carefully considered all the evidence, and on principle, and in the light of well-adjudged cases, we are clear that the trial judge was correct in his ruling. Morse on Banking, § 440; Zane on Banking, § 135; Havana Cent. R. Co. v. Central Trust Co. (C. C. A.) 204 Fed. 550; Merchants’ Nat. Bank v. Nichols & Shepard Co., 223 Ill. 41; 79 N. E. 38, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 752; Honig v. Pacific Bank, 73 Cal. 464, 15 Pac. 58.

Judgment affirmed.
A92A0790.

#### DANIEL v. WELLS OIL COMPANY, INC.

(422 SE2d 55)

Carley, Presiding Judge.

Appellee-plaintiff applied for a distress warrant pursuant to OCGA § 44-7-71. The summons that was served on appellant-defendant pursuant to OCGA § 44-7-72 required that he appear at a hearing scheduled for June 21, 1991. However, the hearing was postponed and rescheduled on several occasions and was eventually set for November 25, 1991. On November 20, 1991, appellant filed his answer. At the subsequent hearing, appellee made an oral motion to strike appellant’s answer as untimely. The trial court granted appellee’s motion and entered default judgment ^against appellant in an amount greater than the $2,500 jurisdictional threshold of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (3). Accordingly, appellant appeals directly from the order of the trial court.

*In dispossessory proceedings,*the summons served on the tenant shall require him “to answer either orally or in writing within seven days from the date of the actual service. . . .” OCGA § 44-7-51 (b). *In distress warrant proceedings,*however, the tenant is not similarly required to answer within a specified time after actual service of the summons. OCGA § 44-7-72 provides only that the summons served on the tenant shall require him “to appear at a hearing on a day certain not less than five nor more than seven days from the date of actual service.” Insofar as the answer in distress warrant proceedings is concerned, the tenant may answer in writing “[a]t or before the time of the hearing” or he may answer orally “at the time of the hearing.” OCGA § 44-7-74 (a).

Thus, regardless of the time of the hearing, the answer of a tenant in dispossessory proceedings is untimely if it is not filed within seven days of the actual service of the summons. However, the answer of a tenant in distress warrant proceedings is timely if it is filed either before or at the time of the hearing. Accordingly, in the instant distress warrant proceedings, appellant was not required to file his answer within any specified time after service of the summons. He was required only to answer before or at the time of the hearing. The original hearing was scheduled for June 21, 1991, but it was postponed and rescheduled for November 25, 1991. Appellant answered before the time of the rescheduled hearing. It follows that the trial court erred in striking appellant’s timely answer and in entering default judgment. In distress warrant proceedings, the trial court is authorized to enter default judgment “[i]f the tenant fails to answer. . . .” OCGA § 44-7-74 (b). Appellant did not fail to answer, because his *332answer preceded the hearing and was, therefore, timely.

Decided September 8, 1992.

*Vincent M. Davison, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Burnside, Wall & Daniel, Thomas R. Burnside III,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Pope and Johnson, JJ., concur.*
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 44 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 162 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 162

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require public disclosure 
    of individual tax returns of candidates for President and Vice 
                    President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Suozzi) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require public disclosure 
    of individual tax returns of candidates for President and Vice 
                    President of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Presidential Tax Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF RETURNS AND RETURN INFORMATION OF CANDIDATES FOR 
              PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (k) of section 6103 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(13) Disclosure of returns and return information of 
        candidates for president and vice president of the united 
        states.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall disclose and 
                make publicly available returns and return information, 
                except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), of any 
                candidate (as defined in section 9002(2)).
                    ``(B) Exceptions.--The information disclosed under 
                subparagraph (A) shall not include the Social Security 
                number of any individual, any financial account number, 
                the name of any individual under age 18, or any home 
                address of any individual (other than the city and 
                State in which such address is located).
                    ``(C) Scope.--Subparagraph (A) shall apply to any 
                return, and return information included on any return, 
                which is filed within the 10 taxable years preceding 
                the year in which the individual becomes a candidate 
                (as so defined).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to individuals becoming a candidate (within the meaning of section 
9002(2)) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2019

NO. 03-19-00684-CV

Fry Sons Ranch, Inc. and James Andy Fry,

Individually and as Sole Director of Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., Appellants

v.

Joseph Nathan Fry, Press Allen Fry, and Edward Heath Fry, All Individually and as

Representatives and Majority Shareholders of Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and as

Beneficiaries of The Press Fry Family Trust, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on September 13, 2019. 

Having reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellants have not prosecuted their appeal and

did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the 

appeal for want of prosecution. Appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and in the court below.
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH     Document 15      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### *In re*RICHEY, Aubrey Talmage

(MR 21797)

Fontana, WI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Aubrey Talmage Richey is suspended from the practice of law for 18 months and until further order of the Court.
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH     Document 19      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH     Document 19      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH     Document 19      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 3 of 3
# C_2009263EN.01002201.xml

| 5.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/22

---

Update of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 316, 28.12.2007, p. 1; OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 16; OJ C 177, 12.7.2008, p. 9; OJ C 200, 6.8.2008, p. 10; OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 13; OJ C 3, 8.1.2009, p. 10; OJ C 37, 14.2.2009, p. 10; OJ C 64, 19.3.2009, p. 20; OJ C 99, 30.4.2009, p. 7; OJ C 229, 23.9.2009, p. 28)

2009/C 263/11

The publication of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security.

SPAIN

Amendment of the information published in OJ C 316, 28.12.2007, p. 1 and in OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 16.

Amendment of the information published in OJ C 316, 28.12.2007, p. 1 and in OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 16.

Air borders

Air borders

| New border crossing point | : | Ciudad Real |
| --- | --- | --- |

New border crossing point

:

Ciudad Real

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to delete a system of records. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Army is proposing to delete a system of records notice from its existing inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

This proposed action will be effective without further notice on June 8, 2001 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Records Management Division, U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency, ATTN: TAPC-PDD-RP, Stop 5603, 6000 6th Street, Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-5603.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Janice Thornton at (703) 806-4390 or DSN 656-4390 or Ms. Christie King at (703) 806-3711 or DSN 656-3711.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Army systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The specific changes to the records systems being amended are set forth below followed by the notice, as amended, published in its entirety. The proposed amendments are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

Dated: May 3, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## A0570-4 ARPC

### System Name:

Human Resources Information System (HRIS) (February 2, 1996, 61 FR 3921).

### Reason:

The records are no longer maintained and have been destroyed.

[FR Doc. 01-11644  Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William Keiper, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hypercom Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2005 By:  /s/ William Keiper    William Keiper    Interim Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/ E. VAN CULLENS
---------------------------
E. Van Cullens
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004

/s/NICHOLAS C. HINDMAN, Sr.
---------------------------
Nicholas C. Hindman, Sr.
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Westell Technologies, Inc. and
will be retained by Westell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.
Case 1:07-cv-04407-AKH Document 2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04407-AKH Document 2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                              List of Subsidiaries
                                       of
                             POGO PRODUCING COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Jurisdiction of
     Name                                         Incorporation             
     ------------------                       ----------------------
<S>  <C>                                      <C>
1.   Pogo Gulf Coast, Ltd.                    Texas Limited Partnership
     (The Company is the general
     partner and a 40% limited partner)

2.   Pogo Hungary Oil and Gas Kft             Republic of Hungary

3.   Pogo Offshore Pipeline Co.               Delaware

4.   Sampack Inc.                             Delaware

5.   Tantawan Services, LLC                   Delaware
     (Directly owned by Thailand
     Finance Company (51%) and
     Sampack Inc. (49%), with Thailand
     Finance Company as the managing
     member.)

6.   Thailand Finance Company                 Delaware

7.   Thiapo Limited                           Kingdom of Thailand

8.   Van Apeldoorn Energy                     The Netherlands
     Company B.V.
</TABLE>