alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2010285EN.01011401.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 285/114 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 285/114

---

Tuesday 24 November 2009Macro-financial assistance to Georgia *

P7_TA(2009)0071

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision providing macro-financial assistance to Georgia (COM(2009)0523 – C7-0269/2009 – 2009/0147(CNS))

2010/C 285 E/20

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2009)0523),

having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0269/2009),

having regard to the Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia of September 2009 (Tagliavini Report),

having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0060/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134392 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134392 

 COA: 276638 

Kent CC: 69-012731-FC 

DENVER MAXWELL GOREE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 27-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 27-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6003
ROBERT L. NELSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-02-1405-AM) Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 24, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert L. Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nelson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Rivera, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), rendered on April 9, 1986, unanimously affirmed. Defendant-appellant’s motion for leave to file a *pro se*supplemental brief denied. No opinion. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 15 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 15 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05361-AKH Document 15 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 47-2000]


Foreign-Trade Zone 104--Chatham County, Georgia; Application for 
Expansion Amendment of Application

    Notice is hereby given that the application of the Savannah Airport 
Commission, grantee of FTZ 104, requesting authority to expand its zone 
in Chatham County, Georgia (Doc. 47-2000, 65 FR 50178, 8/17/00), has 
been amended to remove 1,057 acres from the FTZ expansion request. 
Proposed Site 6 at Mulberry Grove will be reduced from 2,239 acres to 
1,182 acres.
    In addition, this notice will serve to clarify the size of Proposed 
Site 5 at the Savannah International Trade and Convention Center. As 
stated in the original notice, the proposed site would consist of 94 
acres. However, the applicant is requesting FTZ status for only a 24-
acre parcel within the 94-acre site. The application otherwise remains 
unchanged.
    The comment period is reopened until May 31, 2001. Submissions 
(original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive 
Secretary at the address below.
    A copy of the application and the amendment and accompanying 
exhibits are available for public inspection at the following 
locations:

U.S. Department of Commerce, Export Assistance Center, 6001 Chatham 
Center Drive, Suite 100, Savannah, GA 31405.
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 
4008, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: April 25, 2001.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10861 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 26-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 26-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of December 16, 2019 by and
between Playa Resorts Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability Company with an address at 3950 University Drive, Suite 301, Fairfax, Virginia 22030 (“Playa Resorts”) and Bruce D. Wardinski (“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Executive and Playa Resorts have previously entered into an Executive Employment Agreement dated December 28, 2018
(the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Executive and Playa Management now desire to amend the Employment
Agreement to eliminate certain payments to Executive following a Change in Control or Partial Change in Control. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, the parties agree as follows: 

1.    Section 6(g)(ii) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 

“(ii) Termination within 60 Days following Change in Control or Partial Change in Control. If Mr. Wardinski terminates his
employment without Good Reason within sixty (60) days following a Change in Control or Partial Change in Control, the termination shall be treated as a termination pursuant to Section 6(c) above; provided, however, that (A) the
Severance Payment shall be zero (0) months, (B) no Additional Amounts or pro-rata Discretionary Annual Bonus shall be due and (C) the Restricted Period (for purposes of the restriction on competition
described in Section 8(a) below) shall be zero (0) months.” 
 2.    The definition of Restricted Period set forth in
Section 8(v) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 
 “(v)
“Restricted Period” shall mean the Employment Period and a period of eighteen (18) months (six (6) months in the case of a non-renewal or expiration pursuant to Section 6(f)
above or twelve (12) months following a Change in Control pursuant to Section 6(g)(i) above, and zero (0) months following a Change in Control termination pursuant to Section 6(g)(ii) above) following the expiration or
termination of Mr. Wardinski’s employment.” 







 Except as provided in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and
effect and capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Executive and Playa Management have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 
  

									
		 	EXECUTIVE	 		 	PLAYA RESORTS MANAGEMENT LLC
					
		 	 /s/ Bruce D. Wardinski
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alexander Stadlin

		 	Bruce D. Wardinski	 		 		 	Alexander Stadlin
		 		 		 		 	Its Authorized Representative
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Ryan Hymel

		 		 		 		 	 Ryan Hymel
 Its Authorized
Representative
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of enherent,  (the *“Company”*)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*),I, George Warman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/                      | George  Warman |   |
|--------|--------------------------|----------------|--------|
|   | George  Warman           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | Date:  May 14, 2003 |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to enherent Corp. and will beretained by enherent Corp. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZClear

Clear All

-  Master Chief Musician Greg BonistalliSenior Enlisted Leader, U.S. Fleet Forces Band 
-  ENSIGN CHRISTOPHER B. MCGANNASSISTANT FLEET BANDMASTER, U.S. Fleet Forces Band 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rock-Tenn Company (the Corporation), for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, James A. Rubright, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and Steven C. Voorhees, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of the
Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES A. RUBRIGHT                            
|James A. Rubright                                
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|November 26, 2008                                



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ STEVEN C. VOORHEES                                                            
|Steven C. Voorhees                                                                
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer
|November 26, 2008                                                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Rock-Tenn Company and will be retained by Rock-Tenn Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6442 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prevent low-income public 

servants from falling into poverty by modifying the Government Pension 

Offset to protect their Social Security widows and spousal benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2010 

Ms. PINGREE of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prevent 

low-income public servants from falling into poverty by 

modifying the Government Pension Offset to protect 

their Social Security widows and spousal benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Widows 

5 and Spousal Protection Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6442 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON SOCIAL SECURITY GOVERNMENT 

2 PENSION OFFSET. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 202(k)(5) of the Social 

4 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(k)(5)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘two6 thirds of the amount of’’ and all that follows 

7 through ‘‘section 218(b)(2))’’ and inserting ‘‘the ap8 plicable offset amount with respect to such monthly 

9 insurance benefit’’; 

10 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and 

11 (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; and 

12 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol13 lowing new subparagraph: 

14 ‘‘(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A)— 

15 ‘‘(i) The applicable offset amount for any 

16 month with respect to an individual’s monthly insur17 ance benefit is an amount equal to the applicable 

18 percentage of the base offset amount for such 

19 month. 

20 ‘‘(ii) The base offset amount for a month is an 

21 amount equal to two-thirds of the total amount of 

22 all monthly periodic benefits payable to the indi23 vidual for such month which are based on the indi24 vidual’s earnings while in the service of the Federal 

25 Government or any State (or political subdivision 

26 thereof, as defined in section 218(b)(2)). 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6442 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) The applicable percentage is twice the ex2 cess (not less than zero percent) of— 

3 ‘‘(I) the maximum PIA percentage, over 

4 ‘‘(II) 50 percent. 

5 ‘‘(iv) The maximum PIA percentage is the ratio 

6 (expressed as a percentage not in excess of 100 per7 cent) that— 

8 ‘‘(I) the sum of the individual’s monthly 

9 insurance benefit for the month (before reduc10 tion under this paragraph) plus the total 

11 amount of monthly periodic benefits described 

12 in clause (ii) for the month, bears to 

13 ‘‘(II) the amount of the largest possible 

14 primary insurance amount under this title for 

15 the preceding month of December.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply with respect to monthly insurance 

18 benefits payable under title II of the Social Security Act 

19 for months after November 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 24 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DARRELL LEE FRECH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

INCORPORATED CASE,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-6032

(D.C. No. 96-CV-1399)

(Western District of Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

“Darrell Lee., Frech” appeals from an order of the district court dismissing his pro

se “9th Amendment Petition for De jure Grand Jury.” That document is a conglomeration
- 2 -

of legalese and gibberish of unintelligible content purporting to demand the impaneling of

a grand jury to investigate unidentified offenses. The petition was dismissed for failure to

prosecute, and the petitioner has appealed.

The brief in this court is no more intelligible than the papers filed in the district

court. Petitioner cites only generalized legal theory relating to the grand jury system

without identifying any cognizable legal theory upon which the district court had

jurisdiction to grant him relief. Clearly, no such authority exists. Hence, the results of

this case are obvious, the petitioner’s “arguments” are patently unmeritorious, and this

action is frivolous. Braley v. Campbell, 832 F. 2d 1504, 1510 (10th Cir. 1987). 

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 23.2


                         Independent Auditors' Consent
                         -----------------------------

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Ceres Group, Inc. (formerly, Central Reserve Life Corporation):

We consent to the use of our report dated February 20, 1998, except for Notes B
and C, as to which the date is March 30, 1998, related to the consolidated
statements of operations, retained earnings, and cash flows of Central Reserve
Life Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1997, and all
related schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report
on Form 10-K of Ceres Group, Inc. and is incorporated by reference in the
registration statement on Form S-8 of the Company for the Retirement Plan for
Employees of the Central Reserve Life Insurance Company.

Our report dated February 20, 1998, except for Notes B and C, as to which the
date is March 30, 1998, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the
Company has suffered substantial losses from operations in 1997 that resulted
in a significantly reduced net capital position and that in December 1997, the
Company obtained an interim loan of $20 million that absent some future event
the Company would not have the ability to repay, which matters raise
substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going
concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.



                                                       /s/ KPMG LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 29, 2000