alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2





SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), by and between CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Brian M. Davis (“Executive”), is entered into and effective as of December 19, 2019.  
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have previously entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2013 (the “Original Employment Agreement”); 
WHEREAS, effective as of December 31, 2018, the Company and Executive entered into that certain First Amendment to the Original Employment Agreement (as so amended, the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18(c) of the Employment Agreement, the Employment Agreement may be amended or modified by a written agreement executed by the Company and Executive; 
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements set forth herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:    
SECTION 1.    Amendment. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to provide that upon expiration of the 2019 Renewal Period on December 31, 2019, the Employment Agreement shall automatically renew for a one-year period ending December 31, 2020 (the “2020 Renewal Period”).  The 2020 Renewal Period shall be included in the definition of “Renewal Period” and “Term” for purposes of the Employment Agreement.   
SECTION 2.    Effect on Employment Agreement.  The Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is and shall continue to be in full force and effect, and is, as hereby amended, confirmed and ratified.  From and after the date hereof, each reference in the Employment Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereunder”, “hereof” or other words of like import shall, except where the context otherwise requires, mean the Employment Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  
SECTION 3.    Counterparts; Facsimile Transmission.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, and all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.  Executed counterparts may be delivered via facsimile or electronic transmission.




[Signature page follows.]










Exhibit 10.2





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above. 




THE COMPANY:


CATCHMARK TIMBER TRUST, INC.


By:  /s/ Donald S. Moss                 
Name: Donald S. Moss
Title: Chair of Compensation Committee






EMPLOYEE:






/s/ Brian M. Davis                          
Brian M. Davis






























































[Signature Page to Second Amendment to Employment Agreement]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 86 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 86

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2009

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To eliminate an unused lighthouse reservation, provide management 
  consistency by incorporating the rocks and small islands along the 
    coast of Orange County, California, into the California Coastal 
 National Monument managed by the Bureau of Land Management, and meet 
 the original Congressional intent of preserving Orange County's rocks 
               and small islands, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESERVATION OF ROCKS AND SMALL ISLANDS ALONG THE COAST OF 
              ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) California Coastal National Monument.--The Act of February 18, 
1931, entitled ``An Act to reserve for public use rocks, pinnacles, 
reefs, and small islands along the seacoast of Orange County, 
California'' is amended by striking ``temporarily reserved'' and all 
that follows through ``United States'' and inserting ``part of the 
California Coastal National Monument and shall be administered as 
such''.
    (b) Repeal of Reservation.--Section 31 of the Act of May 28, 1935, 
entitled ``An Act to authorize the Secretary of Commerce to dispose of 
certain lighthouse reservations, and for other purposes'' is hereby 
repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Clear All

        02 December 2022    

                    SURFLANT Hosts First-Ever Junior Officer Training Symposium                 
                VIRGINIA BEACH, Virginia - Rear Adm. Brendan McLane, commander, Naval Surface Force Atlantic (SURFLANT), hosted the inaugural SURFLANT Junior Officer Training Symposium (JOTS) onboard Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story, Dec. 1.The symposium focused on building upon junior surface            

        12 August 2022    

                    Navy Presents 2022 Capt. Joy Bright Hancock and Master Chief Anna Der-  Vartanian Leadership Awards                 
                Navy leaders presented the Capt. Joy Bright Hancock and Master Chief Anna Der-Vartanian Leadership Awards at the 2022 Joint Women’s Leadership Symposium, hosted by the Sea Services Leadership Association, in Norfolk, Va., July 12, 2022.            

        29 July 2022    

                    DESRON 22 Hosts Fleet Synthetic Training Exercise                 
                VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. - Commander, Destroyer Squadron 22 held a Theater Undersea Warfare Symposium and a digital fleet synthetic training (FST) exercise to coordinate homeland defense across multiple platforms at Naval Support Activity Oceana Dam Neck Annex, Virginia Beach, Virginia, and Naval Station            

        21 June 2022    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet holds Communication, Cybersecurity Symposium                 
                VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. - U.S. 2nd Fleet hosted the 2022 Communication and Cybersecurity Symposium at Expeditionary Warfare Training Group Atlantic at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story in Virginia Beach, Va., June 14-16.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 4, 2015. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00825

- CV

CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS , Appellant

V.

CHRISTOPHER JONES

, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004

- 00540

- 2014



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Stoddart, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Before the Court is the City of Plano, Texas’s February 2, 2015 Unopposed Motion to

Dismiss Appeal. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1).

140825F.P05 /Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS, Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 00825

- CV V.

CHRISTOPHER JONES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law

No. 4, Collin County, Texas,

Trial Court Cause No. 004

- 00540

- 2014.

Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore,

Justices Stoddart and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 4th day of February, 2015.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the sole
general partner of TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership and will be
retained by TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

August 1, 2003

Date

/s/ CHARLES H. LEONARD

Charles H. Leonard
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
TEPPCO GP, Inc., General Partner
DOCSNY-271361v01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

WLODZIMIERZ BELKOWSKI AND TERESA 

BELKOWSKI, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

100 CHURCH, LLC, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05339-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. and 222 BROADWAY, LLC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 October 3, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendants 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. and 

222 BROADWAY, LLC 

Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 20 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 12

                CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Years Ended July 31,
                                                     --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        1999             2000            2001           2002     2003 Restated
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>            <C>               <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings
  Income before cumulative effect of change
    in accounting principle                          $61,271        $  60,507         $34,206        $12,878        $12,392
  Income tax provision                                29,745           35,536          20,091          6,343          2,635
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Earnings                                          91,016           96,043          54,297         19,221         15,027
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed Charges
  Interest expense                                     1,772           21,169          22,195         16,255         27,985
  Portion of rental expense representative of
    interest factor                                      705            1,113           2,082          3,030          3,034
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fixed charges                                      2,477           22,282          24,277         19,285         31,019
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitalized interest                                      --             (580)             --             --             --
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before income tax provision and
  fixed charges                                      $93,493        $ 117,745         $78,574        $38,506        $46,046
                                                     =========================================================================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     37.7x             5.3x            3.2x           2.0x           1.5x
                                                     =========================================================================
</TABLE>
#### ANIMAL RIGHTS FRONT, INC. *v.*REJEAN JACQUES ET AL.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 358 (AC 25006), is denied.

*942
      *Derek V. Oatis*and *Kathleen Eldergill,*in support of the petition.

*Lewis K Wise, David F. Sherwood*and *Duncan J. Forsyth,*in opposition.

Decided May 17, 2005

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Clear All

        29 February 2024    

                    USS Hershel “Woody” Williams (ESB 4) begins African deployment                 
                The Blue military crew (MILCREW) of the Lewis B. Puller-class expeditionary sea base USS Hershel “Woody” Williams (ESB 4) and the ship’s Military Sealift Command Civilian Mariners (CIVMARs) departed Naval Station Rota, Spain to begin a scheduled deployment in the U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVAF) and            

        30 November 2023    

                    U.S.-Italian Navy Undersea Warfare staff talks underway in Naples                 
                Italian Navy Rear Adm. Vito Lacerenza, commander, Italian Submarines, hosted Rear Adm. Stephen Mack, commander, Submarine Group 8, aboard the Italian Todaro-class submarine, Scirè (S 527), during U.S. and Italian Navy Undersea Warfare staff talks, Nov. 20, 2023.            

        04 August 2023    

                    USS Florida conducts a brief logistics stop in Naples, Italy                 
                The Ohio-class guided missile submarine USS Florida (SSGN 728) arrived in the Bay of Naples for a regularly scheduled visit August 4, 2023.            

        27 June 2023    

                    USS Delaware arrives in Faroe Islands                 
                The Virginia-class fast attack submarine USS Delaware (SSN 790) arrived in Tórshavn, Faroe Islands for a scheduled port visit, June 26, 2023.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas Liguori, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hypercom Corporation.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2007 By:  /s/ Thomas Liguori    Thomas Liguori    Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
Exhibit 32    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Neil Christiansen Date: April 25, 2008 Neil Christiansen Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-60445

Summary Calendar

____________________

ALBERT LYNN BARCROFT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States Tax Court

(21515-95)

_________________________________________________________________ December 17, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court determining

that taxpayer Albert Lynn Barcroft was liable for income tax

deficiencies for the years 1992 and 1993 and for additions to tax

under I.R.C. §§ 6651 and 6654. Barcroft failed to file tax returns

for the years in question, and the Commissioner determined his

income tax liabilities based primarily on informati o n returns2

submitted by a third party. The Tax Court sustained the

deficiencies because Barcroft admitted receiving the income; he

devoted his efforts in the Tax Court principally to raising tax

protestor arguments that have been repeatedly rejected by the

courts. On appeal, Barcroft challenges the administrative

procedures and th e procedures in the Tax Court. He asserts that

the Tax Court l acked jurisdiction over this case because the

substitute returns prepared by the Internal Revenue Service and the

notice of deficiency were not signed and because the IRS failed to

summon his books and records prior to issuing the notice of

deficiency. Barcroft also challenges the constitutionality of

placing the burden of proof on him and requiring him to respond to

the Commissioner’s di scovery request. Barcroft’s arguments are

meritless; indeed, they are frivolous . This appeal is,

accordingly, DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The Commissioner has filed a Motion for Imposition of

Sanctions against Barcroft for bringing a frivolous appeal. The

motion is GRANTED in part and Barcroft is assessed double costs.

Fed. R. App. P. 38.

Appeal DISMISSED; Commissioner’s motion for sanctions GRANTED

in part; all other pending motions are DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Axsys Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Almeida,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| February 20, 2007  |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| /s/ David A. Almeida    |   |
| David A. Almeida        |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----