alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Pamela Fredette, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.       /s/ Pamela Fredette     Pamela Fredette    Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand President    May 15, 2006  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 28-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 24 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 22-13 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q AS
OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  346,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,907
<INVENTORY>                                      3,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               373,586
<PP&E>                                         346,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,660,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          327,959
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                     768,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,660,318
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               494,808
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  437,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mary Adams, Appellant, v Wendy Acrish, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated November 21, 1986, which remanded her to the custody of the respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Mental Hygiene Law § 33.15 (b) provides that upon the return of a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person detained in a facility for the mentally disabled, the admissible evidence "shall include the clinical record of the patient and medical or other testimony as required by the court”. The recorded conclusions of physicians and others attending to a patient’s needs at the subject facility are admissible where they are germane to treatment and may be used by experts in court as the basis of their opinions *(Matter of Harry M.,*96 AD2d 201, 208-209). Furthermore, Mental Hygiene Law § 47.03 (d) grants the Mental Hygiene Legal Service, which represented the petitioner in the instant case, access to all books, records and data pertinent to a petitioner’s treatment at an authorized facility. Inasmuch as counsel was afforded such broad power to elicit pertinent information prior to the hearing, the admission into evidence of the petitioner’s entire hospital record does not warrant reversal *(see, Matter of Shawn C. A.,*110 AD2d 697, 698, *lv denied*65 NY2d 605).

In view of the testimony of Dr. Cohn, based both on his own examinations of the petitioner and his review of the progress notes contained in her clinical file as well as the substantiating testimony of Dr. Smoller and, to some extent, the testimony of the petitioner herself, the respondent established by clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner is mentally ill, poses a substantial threat of physical harm to herself or others and is in need of further care and treatment. Lawrence, J. P., Weinstein, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-105623) pertaining to the registration of 2,178,205 shares of common stock pursuant to the Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan; (Form S-8 No. 333-86268) pertaining to 1,087,541 sharesof common stock related to certain Stock Option Grants outside of a plan; (Form S-8 No. 333-74076) pertaining to 6,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan; and (Form S-8 No. 333-41090) pertaining to5,687,318 shares of common stock pursuant to the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Newport Corporation, of our reports dated March 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Newport Corporation, Newport Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofNewport Corporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP 

Orange County, California 

March 13, 2006
Clear All

        29 June 2023    

                    Naval Special Warfare Center Welcomes New Command Master Chief; First SWCC To Hold Position                 
                Naval Special Warfare Center (NSWCEN) welcomed CMDCM (SWCC) Joaquin Martinez as its newest command master chief, June 29.            

        15 May 2023    

                    Father of Naval Special Warfare Posthumously Awarded the Charles P. Gallagher Leadership Medallion                 
                Capt. Phil Bucklew, known as the “father” of Naval Special Warfare (NSW) and a Xavier University alumnus, was posthumously awarded the Charles P. Gallagher Leadership Medallion by the university, May 12.            

        19 October 2022    

                    The Pursuit of Diversity in Naval Special Warfare                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - Naval Special Warfare has been the nation’s premier maritime special operations force for 60 years—with a legacy dating to World War II—and to maintain that title, NSW leadership believes fostering a culture of diversity and inclusion is a critical factor to current            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# C_2009320EN.01002301.xml

| 24.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/23

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

2009/C 320/10

The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in an area known as Terschelling-West.

The area covered by the application is in the province of Friesland and in territorial waters and is bounded by the straight lines joining the following vertices:

| Vertex | X | Y |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 139 725,00 | 600 837,00 |
| 2 | 145 445,00 | 598 067,00 |
| 3 | 142 573,00 | 595 291,00 |
| 4 | 140 264,00 | 595 686,00 |
| 5 | 137 803,00 | 598 952,00 |

Vertex

X

Y

1

139 725,00

600 837,00

2

145 445,00

598 067,00

3

142 573,00

595 291,00

4

140 264,00

595 686,00

5

137 803,00

598 952,00

The above-mentioned vertices are defined by their geographical coordinates, calculated according to the National Triangulation System (RD, Rijks Driehoeksmeting).

On the basis of this description of the area, the surface area is 23,22 km2.

2

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in the area bounded by the above-mentioned vertices and coordinates.

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the above-mentioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| De minister van Economische Zaken |
| --- |
| ter attentie van J. C. De Groot, directeur Energiemarkt |
| ALP A/562 |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 30 |
| Postbus 20101 |
| 2500 EC Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

De minister van Economische Zaken

ter attentie van J. C. De Groot, directeur Energiemarkt

ALP A/562

Bezuidenhoutseweg 30

Postbus 20101

2500 EC Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr E. J. Hoppel on the following telephone number: +31 703797088.

---
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Karl Brenza, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.       /s/ Karl Brenza         Karl Brenza    Chief Financial Officer    August 14, 2006  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent, Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6003

ROBERT L. NELSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-02-1405-AM)

Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 24, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254

proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct.

1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S.

941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Nelson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the amended annual report of Caneum, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  December 23, 2003

/s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan
Sukhbir Singh Mudan, President and
Treasurer (Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 21 Filed 08/27/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 21 Filed 08/27/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 21 Filed 08/27/2008 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR01-11-000]


PanEnergy Louisiana Intrastate, LLC; Notice of Petition for Rate 
Approval

May 2, 2001.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2001, LLC (PanEnergy) filed a 
Petition for Rate Approval (Petition) pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2) 
of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 284.123(b)(2). In the Petition, 
PanEnergy requests the Commission to approve a rate for firm and 
interruptible transportation service under Section 311(a)(2) of the 
Natural Gas Policy Act of $0.2071 per MMBtu.
    Pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2)(ii) of the Commission's 
regulations, if the Commission does not act within 150 days of the 
Petition's filing date, the rates proposed therein will be deemed to be 
fair and equitable and not in excess of an amount that interstate 
pipelines would be permitted to charge for similar services. The 
Commission may, prior to the expiration of the 150-day period, extend 
the time for action or institute a proceeding to afford parties an 
opportunity for written comments and for the oral presentation of 
views, data and arguments.
    Any person desiring to participate in the rate proceeding must file 
a motion to intervene with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426 in accordance with Sections 
385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedures. All motions must be filed with the Secretary of the 
Commission on or before May 17, 2001. Copies of this filing are on file 
with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11486 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Clear All

        19 October 2022    

                    The Pursuit of Diversity in Naval Special Warfare                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - Naval Special Warfare has been the nation’s premier maritime special operations force for 60 years—with a legacy dating to World War II—and to maintain that title, NSW leadership believes fostering a culture of diversity and inclusion is a critical factor to current            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# C_2009157DE.01002001.xml

| 10.7.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 157/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 157/20

---

Berichtigung der Mitteilung der Kommission über ein vereinfachtes Verfahren für die Würdigung bestimmter Kategorien staatlicher Beihilfen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 136 vom 16. Juni 2009
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 136 vom 16. Juni 2009

2009/C 157/10

Im Inhalt und auf Seite 3, Titel des Dokuments:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

---

(1)  Text von Bedeutung für den EWR.“

1

(2)  Text von Bedeutung für den EWR.“

2

---
**EXHIBIT 21****SUBSIDIARIES OF GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANY**           Subsidiaries       State of Incorporation           1.Aequus Property Management Company Texas2.Grubb & Ellis Affiliates, Inc. Delaware3.Grubb & Ellis of Arizona, Inc. Washington4.Grubb & Ellis Asset Services Company Delaware5.Grubb & Ellis Europe, Inc. California6.Grubb & Ellis Institutional Properties, Inc. California7.Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. Delaware *Subsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc.*:   a.Grubb & Ellis Management Services of Michigan,Inc. (“GEMS of Michigan”)Michigan b.Grubb & Ellis Management Services of Canada, Inc.Canada c.GEMS Mexicana, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.Mexico d.Grubb & Ellis Management Services of Brazil LTDABrazil e.GEMS of Sweden, ABSweden f.GEMS Korea, LLCKorea g.Crane Realty & Management Co.California  *Subsidiaries of Crane Realty & Management Co.:*    1.Crane Realty Services, Inc. California h.Middle East Real Estate Services, LLCDelaware  *Subsidiaries of Middle East Real Estate Services, LLC*    1.Gulf States Realty Advisors, LLC Qatar8.Grubb & Ellis Mortgage Group, Inc. California9.Grubb & Ellis Mortgage Services, Inc. California10.Grubb & Ellis New York, Inc. New York11.Grubb & Ellis of Michigan, Inc. Michigan12.Grubb & Ellis of Nevada, Inc. Nevada13.Grubb & Ellis Advisers of California, Inc. California14.Grubb & Ellis Consulting Services Company Florida *Subsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Consulting Services Company:*   a.Landauer Hospitality International, Inc.Delaware b.Landauer Securities, Inc.Massachusetts15.Grubb & Ellis Southeast Partners, Inc. California16.HSM Inc. Texas17.White Commercial Real Estate California18.Wm. A. White/Grubb & Ellis, Inc. New York19.GERA Property Acquisition LLC Delaware *Subsidiaries of GERA Property Acquisition LLC*   a.GERA 6400 Shafer LLCDelaware b.GERA Abrams Centre LLCDelaware c.GERA Danbury LLCDelaware