alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2064

BELL ATLANTIC-WASHINGTON, DC, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SYED H. (NAYYAR) ZAIDI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-97-467-A)

Submitted: November 26, 1997 Decided: December 15, 1997

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Syed H. Zaidi, Appellant Pro Se. Betty S. W. Graumlich, MCSWEENEY,

BURTCH & CRUMP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from two district court orders denying various motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337

U.S. 541 (1949). The orders appealed here are neither final orders

nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

We therefore dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

----------------------------------------------------------------x

Enrique Mendoza and Maria De Mendoza

Plaintiffs,

- against -

NOMURA HOLDING AMERICA INC. and

NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

et al. (see Defendants’ List)

Defendants.

Index No.: 07cv05302(AKH)

NOTICE OF THE NOMURA

PARTIES’ ADOPTION OF

ANSWER TO MASTER

COMPLAINT

_________________________

1:21-MC-00102

----------------------------------------------------------------x

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants NOMURA PARTIES (Nomura

Holding America Inc., Nomura Securities International Inc.) as and for their responses to

the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) related to

the Master Complaint filed herein and applicable to the above captioned matter hereby

adopts all of the responses and all of the affirmative defenses contained in the Answer

to the Master Complaint dated, filed and served July 31, 2007, In re World Trade Center

Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC102 (AKH). The responses to all of the

allegations in the Master Complaint are adopted herein and are applicable to the CheckOff Complaint served and filed herein.

Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 31 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 1 of 3
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Defendant, NOMURA PARTIES,

reserves the right to serve and file an amended answer and specifically reserves the

right to interpose a cross claim against any and all co-defendants.

PLAEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Defendant, NOMURA PARTIES, also

adopts all affirmative defenses and the jury demand therein.

WHEREFORE, Defendant, NOMURA PARTIES, demands judgment dismissing

the above captioned action against it along with the costs and disbursements of this

action.

Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 31 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 2 of 3
Dated: September 14, 2007

New York, New York

Yours, etc.

STRONGIN ROTHMAN & ABRAMS, LLP

s/ Dror M. Bikel

________________________________

Dror M. Bikel, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant

NOMURA HOLDING AMERICA, INC.

50 Broadway, Suite 2003

New York, NY 10004

(212) 931-8300

Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 31 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board; Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting Date 
Change

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting date change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DBS) Task Force on Systems 
Technology for the Future U.S. Strategic Posture closed meeting 
scheduled for May 16-17, 2001, has been changed to May 30-31, 2001. The 
meeting will be held at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, 
Suite 600, Arlington, VA.

    Dated: April 25, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-10895 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,851
<SECURITIES>                                     5,467
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                       564
<INVENTORY>                                      1,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,712
<PP&E>                                           6,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,003
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,601
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,091
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    95
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,821
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,347
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
#### In re FORTY-SECOND ST. M. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

No opinion. The court is of the opinion that this application should not be entertained at the present time, for the reasons stated orally upon the argument.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amendment to Quarterly Report of Summit
Brokerage Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Marshall T. Leeds, as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ Marshall T. Leeds
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Marshall T. Leeds
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                         February 6, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Summit Brokerage Services, Inc. and will be retained by Summit
Brokerage Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
(84 South. 808)

#### COMMERCIAL SAVINGS BANK & TRUST CO. v. A. Z. BAILEY GROCERY CO. et al.

(8 Div. 209.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1919.)

Appeal and error &wkey;>78(2)—Order striking AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT FOR INTERPLEADER A FINAL JUDGMENT AS AGAINST HIM.

Order of trial court, striking the affidavit of defendant for interpleader, *held*a final judgment as against defendant for purposes of his appeal therefrom.

Sayre, J., dissenting.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Action by the Commercial Savings Bank <S Trust Company against the A. Z. Bailey Grocery Company and others, in which H. C. Schrader Company was interpleaded. Erom order striking plea of interpleader, and discharging the H. C. Schrader Company, plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals, which dismissed the appeal on motion (83 South. 11), and plaintiff applies for certiorari.

Writ granted, and judgment reversed and remanded.

E. C. Nix and G. O. Chenault, both of Albany, for appellant.

The statute of inter-pleader entitled to a liberal construction. 23 Cyc. 36; 36 Cyc. 813. The judgment as to the Schrader Company was final. 19 Cyc. 532; 3 Corpus Juris, 493; 23 Cyc. 35.

Eyster & Eyster, of Albany, and E. W. Godbcy, of Decatur, for appellee.

The statute controls appeals. Sections 2837, 2838, 2S39 et seq. The judgment in' this case was not final. 79 Ala. 287; 15 Ala. App. 647, 74 South. 749 ; 81 South. 179.

SAYRE, J.

The court holds that the order of the trial court striking the affidavit of petitioner (defendant in the trial court) for an interpleader is a final judgment as against the defendant, who took an appeal to the Court of Appeals, and therefore that the Court of Appeals committed error in dismissing the appeal on the ground that there was no final judgment to support an appeal.

The writer does not concur. This is a proceeding in a court of law. There is no statute authorizing an appeal in cases of this particular kind. The right of appeal depends upon the general statute, section 2847 of the Code, which provides that au appeal will lie from any final judgment. The question as to the finality of this order is to be determined on common-law principles. According to that law, if the judgment does not dispose of the whole case on its merits, it is not final. Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3, 1 Sup. Ct. 15, 27 L. Ed. 73; 1 Mich. Dig. p. 303, § 66. I think that the order in this case did nothing more than might have been accomplished by an adverse ruling on any other defensive pleading; it left the original parties to litigate the suit to an end and with the right of review upon a final judgment disposing of the whole case between them. So, whatever may have béen the merit or demerit of defendant’s interpleader, there was, as to defendant at least, no final judgment, no appealable order.

The judgment of the court is that the judgment of the Court of Appeals he reversed, and that the cause be remanded to that court for further proceedings.

All the Justices concur, except SAYRE, J., who dissents, and BROWN, J., not sitting.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JOHN ALAN SAKON, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

JOHN JOHNSON, F. PERRONE, BRUCE D. SKEHAN, PETER BRANDER, NEAL CAVANAUGH, MICHAEL ROBERTS, PETER J. CELIO, WILMARY LABONTE, DANIELLE STONE

- MITCHELL, CHRISTOPHER FERREIRA, SETH CONANT, FREED MARCROFT LLC, GLASTONBURY, CT, MANCHESTER, CT, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Defendants

- Appellees

FRANCELIA MARIE SEVIN, DENNIS O ’ TOOLE, Defendants

______________________

2024

- 1747

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Connecticut in No. 3:23

- cv

- 00107

- AWT, Senior Judge Alvin W. Thompson.

______________________

Before P ROST

, T ARANTO

, and H UGHES

, Circuit Judges

.

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R Case: 24-1747 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 07/24/2024SAKON v. JOHNSON 2

John Alan Sakon sued local and state officials in the
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging various civil rights violations

. The district court dismissed the complaint, and Mr. Sakon filed a notice of appeal directed to this court. In response to this court’s show cause order, appellees argue that this court lacks jurisdiction , while Mr. Sakon asks for transfer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

. 1

In general, this court’s jurisdiction to review district

court cases is limited to cases that arise under the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to
the district court from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, see § 1295(a)(4)(C); or cases that involve certain damages claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see § 1295(a)(2). Mr. Sakon’s case does not fall within that jurisdiction , and we conclude that transfer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is appropriate. See 28 U.S.C. § § 41, 1291 , 1294, 1631.

Accordingly

,

1 Mr. Sakon has moved to file his response to the

show cause order out

- of

- time, ECF No. 14, which is granted. Case: 24-1747 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 07/24/2024SAKON v. JOHNSON 3

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The appeal and all its filings are transferred to theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Ju ly 2 4 , 2024
Date F OR THE C OURT Case: 24-1747 Document: 24 Page: 3 Filed: 07/24/2024
Clear All

        11 January 2024    

#                     Navy Exchange Service Command’s Second Micro Market@Sea is Underway                 

                The Micro Market@Sea, a new quality of service concept by the Navy Exchange Service Command (NEXCOM), is now underway onboard the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69). Only the second of its kind, the mission of this self-service facility is to provide Sailors with 24/7 convenience and access to food,            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMB
PROPERTY, L.P.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          70,821
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,270
<PP&E>                                       3,068,698
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,647,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,360
<BONDS>                                      1,278,571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,955,119
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,647,947
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               336,733
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            137,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,856)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,275
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36


</TABLE>
Clear All

        30 March 2023    

                    USS Mesa Verde hosts Family Day for loved ones to learn about their Sailors                 
                NAVAL STATION NORFOLK, Va. –  On March 24, USS Mesa Verde (LPD 19) hosted an open house for its family members with ship tours, good eats, and a live band performing for the crew.Mesa Verde Executive Officer, Cmdr. William Bridges said Family Day was for spouses and children to better appreciate            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-01515-AKH Document 17 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01515-AKH Document 17 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01515-AKH Document 17 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

21MC103(AKH)

THOMAS MAHER, 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

07CV5416(AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY 

CENTURY 21, INC. OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant CENTURY 21, INC. (hereinafter “Century 

21”) as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off 

Complaint) related to the Master Complaint adding new defendants not previously served filed in 

the above-referenced action, herein adopts Century 21’s Answer to Master Complaint dated 

August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). CENTURY 21 has filed a Master Disclosure of 

Interested Parties in 21 MC 102 (AKH), and as such, is exempt from having to file such a 

disclosure in this specific matter, pursuant to the provisions of Case Management Order No. 4 (¶ 

J(2)). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT defendant, Century 21 reserves its right 

to assert any defenses to which it is entitled, including but not limited to those enumerated in 

Case Management Order No. 4 (¶¶ D(1)-(5)). 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, Century 21demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action as 

against it, together with its costs and disbursements. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 January 16, 2008 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CENTURY 21, INC. 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor 

New York, New York 10005 

(212) 687-0100 

TO: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

All Counsel via ECF 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on January 16, 2008, I caused to be filed and served 

the following document electronically via the Court’s ECF system upon the parties: 

1. Notice of Century 21’s Adoption of Answer to Master Complaint. 

Dated: January 16, 2008 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 3 of 3
Clear All

        24 October 2022    

                    Carrier Strike Group 4 Exercise Enhances Beginning of Gerald R. Ford Inaugural Deployment with NATO Allies                 
                The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group and ships from three North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries completed a three-week exercise orchestrated by Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 4 called Task Force Exercise (TFEX) 23-2 from Oct. 5 to 23.             

        18 October 2022    

                    NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk Supports Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group (GRFCSG) departed Naval Station Norfolk for its first deployment Oct. 4, thanks in part to the work of the Sailors and civilians of the NAVSUP FLC Norfolk Logistics Support Center (LSC).            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website