alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        11 March 2024    

                    U.S. Army Assault Helicopters Conduct Deck Landings on USNS Dahl                 
                Soldiers with 2nd Battalion, 2nd Aviation Regiment, 2nd Combat Aviation Brigade (2-2 CAB) conducted deck landings with U.S. Army UH-60M Black Hawk helicopters on prepositioning ship USNS Dahl (T-AKR 312), March 7.            

        21 August 2023    

                    Military Sealift Command’s USNS Millinocket aids vessel in distress                 
                Military Sealift Command's (MSC) expeditionary fast transport USNS Millinocket (T EPF 3) rendered assistance to a distressed small leisure boat in the vicinity of Darwin, Australia, Aug. 8.            

        17 August 2023    

                    Military Sealift Command’s USNS Millinocket Aids Vessel In Distress                 
                TIMOR SEA -- Military Sealift Command (MSC) expeditionary fast transport USNS Millinocket (T EPF 3) rendered assistance to a distressed small leisure boat in the vicinity of Darwin, Australia, Aug. 8.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 29 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 29 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05348-AKH Document 29 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

x ----------------­

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

x ----------------­

WILLIAM TOLEDO (AND WIFE, PATRICIA 

TOLEDO) 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

v. PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 1539 

__________________x 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower D Co. L.P. and WFP Tower D 

Co. GP Corp. (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the 

Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield 

Parties' Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the 

matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 

102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each ofthem, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 23 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

February ~2008

Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 23 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### Eugene THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. DORRIETY; Scotty Bodiford; Tracy H. Krien; Patricia Rae, PA; Susan Ward, et al, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-7977.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2013.

Decided: April 30, 2013.

Eugene Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., Chapman, Harter & Harter, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Thomas, a South Carolina inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Thomas’ civil rights action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. *201R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed.R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[ T] he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 25, 2012. Around the same time, Thomas was transferred to another facility. The district court re-issued the order and judgment on October 1, 2012, after learning of Thomas’ address change. Running the thirty-day appeal period from this later date, the latest day for filing a timely notice of appeal was Thursday, October 31, 2012. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 26(a)(1). Thomas’ notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on Wednesday, November 14, 2012. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1).

Because Thomas failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we are constrained to dismiss the appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# C_2009226EN.01002601.xml

| 19.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/26

---

Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

Request from a contracting entity

2009/C 226/08

On 10 September 2009 the Commission received a request under Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 11 September 2009.

1

The request, from Österreichische Post AG, concerns postal services and other services (see Article 6(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/17/EC) in Austria. The above-mentioned Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC is not applicable when the activity in question is directly exposed to competition in markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission has a period of three months to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 11 December 2009.

This period may be extended by three months. Any such extension must be published.

Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 30(6), further requests concerning postal services and other services in Austria before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request will not be considered as new procedures and will be treated in the context of this request.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Adya S. Tripathi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tripath Technology Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tripath Technology Inc.

|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /S/ ADYA S. TRIPATHI   
|Name:  |  | Dr. Adya S. Tripathi   
|Title: |  | Chairman, President and
|       |  | Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 9, 2006

I, Kathleen M. Lahaye, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Tripath Technology Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tripath Technology Inc.

|       |  |                               
|------ |  | ------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Kathleen M. Lahaye        
|Name:  |  | Kathleen M. Lahaye            
|Title: |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer

Date August 9, 2006
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23B


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-35815 on Form S-8 dated July 13, 1990, and in Registration Statement No.
33-35816, on Form S-8 dated July 13, 1990, and in Registration Statement No.
33-35817, and on Form S-8 dated July 13, 1990, and in Registration Statement No.
33-42452 on Form S-8 dated August 29, 1991, of our report dated March 2, 1995,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Liqui-Box
Corporation included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 28, 1996.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 26, 1997












                                       72
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. GT01-19-000] 

Take notice that on April 30, 2001, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to become effective April 30, 2001:

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 5 

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 6 

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 6A 

Third Revised Sheet No. 7 

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 8 

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 9

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 10

Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being filed simply to update its Systems Maps with the recent information available. 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)((iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm. 

David P. Boergers, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11663 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Neil Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date);  and  c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. As certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report   financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and     October 23, 2007/s/ Neil ChristiansenNeil ChristiansenChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 24.6



POWER OF ATTORNEY



I, Alan Kessman, a duly elected Director of Comdial Corporation, a Delaware corporation, do hereby constitute and appoint Ralph R. Dyer and Carla K. Luke, or either of
them, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities (including without limitation, as Director of Comdial), to sign Comdials Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, with all exhibits thereto, and any and all documents in connection therewith, hereby granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full
power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done, and hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney
shall not terminate upon my disability.



Dated: 03/26/04



| |  |                 
| |  | ----------------
| |  | /s/ Alan Kessman
| |  | Alan Kessman
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
T. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           By:    /s/ James T. Barry
                                                  ------------------
                                                  James T. Barry
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  January 31, 2011
Clear All

        24 February 2023    

                    SOUTHCOM Hosts Submarine Force's Submarine Conference of the Americas                 
                Commander, Submarine Forces hosted the Submarine Conference of the Americas (SCOTA) at U.S. Southern Command in Miami, Florida, February 13-15.            

        19 October 2022    

                    USS Milwaukee deploys, will support counter-illicit trafficking in Caribbean, Eastern Pacific                 
                MAYPORT, Fla. - The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Milwaukee (LCS 5), along with the “Dragon Whales” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 28 Detachment 9 and embarked U.S. Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachment (LEDET), departed from Naval Station Mayport Oct. 18,            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 6-5 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 6-5 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        17 June 2022    

                    BALTOPS 22, the premier Baltic Sea maritime exercise, concludes in Kiel                 
                KIEL, Germany - Sixteen NATO Allied and partner nations concluded the 51st iteration of Baltic Operations 2022 (BALTOPS22) in Kiel, Germany, June 17, 2022.            

        13 June 2022    

                    Naval Oceanography enables safe operations during BALTOPS 22                 
                Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command is participating in the 51st iteration of exercise Baltic Operations (BALTOPS) via the embarked Meteorology and Oceanography (METOC) detachments aboard the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) and the Blue Ridge-class command and control            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### In the Matter of Shane Atkins, Petitioner, v R. Miles, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

— Casey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review two determinations of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which *998found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, an inmate in the State correctional system, seeks to vacate two determinations of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which affirmed the disposition of one Superintendent’s proceeding and modified a second disposition. Appearing *pro se,*petitioner mounts a number of challenges to the procedural adequacy of the Superintendent’s proceedings, but we find no merit in his claims.

The hearings in this case were tier III Superintendent’s proceedings and were conducted in accordance with the relevant regulations *(see,*7 NYCRR part 254). In particular, petitioner received the inmate assistance to which he was entitled *(see,*7 NYCRR 251-4.2) and we find no support for his claim that he was deprived of documentary evidence. Petitioner’s claim concerning the hearing officer’s failure to interview witnesses is also unavailing. Petitioner had the right to call witnesses (7 NYCRR 254.5) and he was adequately advised of this right, but elected not to call any witnesses. In these circumstances, the hearing officer was not required to interview witnesses *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130, 140-143). We find no support in the record for petitioner’s claims that the hearing officer was biased and improperly entered a plea on petitioner’s behalf.

Since the record reveals no procedural deficiencies in the Superintendent’s proceedings, and since the written misbehavior reports by officers having firsthand knowledge of petitioner’s misbehavior constituted substantial evidence to support the hearing officer’s findings that petitioner violated institutional rules *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, supra,*at 139, 140), the determinations must be confirmed.

Determinations confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

MAURILIO VITERBO-GARCIA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10485 

D.C. No. 4:16-cr-00720-JAS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Maurilio Viterbo-Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for reentry of a 

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Viterbo-Garcia’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 2 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-10485 

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

We have provided Viterbo-Garcia the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental 

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.