alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DOCSNY-271698v01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

JAIME ROJAS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

100 CHURCH, LLC, et al.,

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-4511-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 October 3, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen___ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 39 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Clear All

        05 May 2022    

                    In a first, a littoral combat ship deploys to U.S. Sixth Fleet area of operations                 
                In a historic moment for the region, a Freedom-variant littoral combat ship, USS Sioux City (LCS 11), deployed to U.S. Sixth Fleet’s area of operations, supporting U.S. and NATO Ally and Partner interests in Europe and Africa.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 18 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 18 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05341-AKH Document 18 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Gallo, Appellant. Lillian Roberts, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Levine, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 16, 1987, which ruled that claimant’s benefit rate was subject to reduction.

Claimant worked for his employer for 46 years until October 14, 1985 when he was terminated due to nondisqualifying circumstances. Claimant chose to formally retire in order to protect his medical benefits. The retirement became effective November 1, 1986 and claimant elected to receive his pension benefits in a lump-sum payment. However, because of administrative delay in processing his pension application, he did not actually receive the payment for some two months. In the *970meantime, claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits. In mid-November 1986, the Commissioner of Labor determined that claimant’s unemployment insurance benefit rate was subject to reduction pursuant to Labor Law § 600 (7). That section provides that under certain circumstances admittedly applicable here, a claimant’s benefit rate is reduced to reflect the claimant’s receipt of retirement benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board upheld the determination.

Claimant’s sole contention on appeal is that the Commissioner was not authorized to reduce his unemployment insurance benefits based upon his pension entitlement, prior to the time he actually began receiving his pension. This argument is without merit. At the time of the initial determination, claimant had already retired and selected his pension benefit option. The amount he was entitled to receive in pension benefits was established and it is undisputed that these benefits, when received, actually related back to November 1, 1986, claimant’s effective date of retirement. Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the decision to reduce claimant’s unemployment insurance benefits reflects a rational interpretation of Labor Law § 600 (7) (a) and must be affirmed.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XI 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000215406
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,536
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           2,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (227)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,265
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (69)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (69)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (69)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.27)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#                                                                         NECC Recovery Care Management Program Critical to Expeditionary Multidisciplinary Care Team                                                                    

##### by  Senior Chief Petty Officer Kimberly Martinez

13 February 2023

                220205-N-PI330-1331 Camp Shelby, Mississippi (February 5, 2023) Master Sgt. Zachary Norris, assigned to Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 133 (NMCB 133), raises a light plant on Camp Shelby, Mississippi, February 5, 2023. NMCB 133 is at Camp Shelby, Mississippi conducting a field training exercise operating as part of Navy Expeditionary Combat Command conducting the advanced phase of the force readiness training plan (FRTP). (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Andrew Waters/Released)            

                220205-N-PI330-1331            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Petty Officer 2nd Class Andrew Waters

VIRIN: 220205-N-PL330-1331

Tags:
**NECC**NECF**Expeditionary**Wounded Warrior Program**Recovery

Terms:
**Navy Family**BUMED**NECC**Medical**People
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RAIT Financial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott F. Schaeffer, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Scott F. Schaeffer            
|Scott F. Schaeffer                   
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|Date: August 10, 2009
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-31115 Summary Calendar

RODERICK PRESIDENT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BARON KAYLO; CLYDE BENSON; CAPTAIN VILLEMARETTE; SERGEANT DESELLE; LIEUTENANT COLONEL TIGNER; MARCUS BECKHAM; STEVE GAYNARD, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:01-CV-2613

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roderick President, Louisiana state prisoner # 384264, proceeding pro se, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in an appeal of the district court’s final judgment that dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. President’s IFP motion is a challenge to the magistrate judge’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).No. 05-31115 -2- President’s change in custodial status, as alleged in his complaint, does not affect a protectable liberty interest or violate his constitutional rights. See Sandin v. Conner , 515 U.S. 472, 486 (1995). Further, President did not allege that the loss of his good time credits pursuant to a disciplinary proceeding violated the procedural protections provided by Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539, 556, 564-66 (1974), or allege that he received any other punishment that would implicate a due process

concern. President’s retaliation claims likewise fail because he does not show that but for his grievance filed in December 2000 regarding the prison’s smoking policy, he would not have been subject to disciplinary proceedings. Woods v. Smith , 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995). President has not shown that the district court erred in certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. He has not shown that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal counts as one strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). President is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be able toNo. 05-31115 -3- proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-313]

Entergy Operations, Inc., Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1, Notice of 
Availability of the Final Supplement 3 to the Generic Environmental 
Impact Statement Regarding the License Renewal of Arkansas Nuclear One, 
Unit 1

    Notice is hereby given that the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
(the Commission) has published a final plant-specific Supplement 3 to 
the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS), NUREG-1437, 
regarding the renewal of operating license DPR-51 for an additional 20 
years of operation at Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 (ANO-1). ANO-1 is 
located in Pope County, Arkansas. Possible alternatives to the proposed 
action (license renewal) include no action and reasonable alternative 
energy sources.
    In Section 9.3 of the report, the staff concludes:

    The staff recommends that the Commission determine that the 
adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for ANO-1 are not 
so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy 
planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable. This recommendation 
is based on (1) the analysis and findings in the Generic 
Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power 
Plants, NUREG-1437; (2) the Entergy ER [Environmental Report]; (3) 
consultation with other Federal, State, and local agencies; (4) the 
staff's own independent review; and (5) the staff's consideration of 
public comments.

    The final Supplement 3 to the GEIS is available electronically for 
public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room located at One White 
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, 
or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's 
document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at 
http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html (the Public Electronic Reading 
Room).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Mr. Thomas J. Kenyon, Generic Issues, 
Environmental, Financial, and Rulemaking Branch, Division of Regulatory 
Improvement Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 
DC 20555. Mr. Kenyon may be contacted at (301) 415-1120 or by writing 
to: Thomas J. Kenyon, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, MS 0-11 F1, 
Washington, DC 20555.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of April, 2001.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David B. Matthews,
Director, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 01-11109 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **Certification    of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial    Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the    undersigned officers of AMB Property Corporation, the sole    general partner of AMB Property, L.P. (the “Operating    Partnership”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s    knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of the Operating Partnership for the quarterly period ended    September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange    Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Operating Partnership.     Date: November 7, 2006      By: /s/  Hamid    R. Moghadam    Hamid R. Moghadam*Chairman and CEO*      By: /s/  W.    Blake Baird    W. Blake Baird*President and Director*      By: /s/  Michael    A. Coke    Michael A. Coke*CFO and Executive Vice President*     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to    accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of    Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as    amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any    filing of the Operating Partnership, whether made before or    after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation    language in such filing.
Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
#                                                                         Navy’s weather, ice experts the first line of defense for personnel training and researching in the dangerous Arctic                                                                    

##### by  Lt. Seth Koenig

08 March 2022PRUDHOE BAY, ALASKA  -- 

                220220-N-YS525-002 PRUDHOE BAY, ALASKA (Feb. 20, 2022) – Lt. Colleen Wilmington, assigned to the Naval Ice Center (NAVICE) in Suitland, Maryland, is pictured outside an airplane hangar in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Wilmington is serving as the officer in charge of a four-person meteorological team from NAVICE and Strike Group Oceanography Team (SGOT) Norfolk supporting the U.S. Navy’s Ice Exercise (ICEX) 2022. ICEX 2022 is a three-week exercise that allows the Navy to assess its operational readiness in the Arctic, increase experience in the region, advance understanding of the Arctic environment, and continue to develop relationships with other services, allies and partner organizations.  (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. Seth Koenig/RELEASED)            

                220220-N-YS525-002            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Lt. Seth Koenig

VIRIN: 220219-N-YS525-0022

Tags:
**ICEX**submarine**Meteorology and Oceanography
(85 South. 501)

#### SLOSS-SHEFFIELD STEEL & IRON CO. v. SAMPSON.

(6 Div. 40.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 14, 1920.)

Appeal and error <@=655 (2) — BUI of exceptions not presented in time stricken on motion.

Motion, on appeal from original judgment, to strike bill of exceptions not presented to the trial judge within the 90 days allowed by law therefor, must prevail.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County ; Romaine Boyd, Judge.

Action by Peter Sampson against the- ’• Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Tillman, Bradley & Morrow, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Frank S. "JVhite & Sons, of Birmingham,, for appellee.

SOMERVILLE, J.

The judgment for the plaintiff in this cause was rendered on March *24113, 1919, and defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled on May 31, 1919. The appeal is from the original judgment, and the bill of exceptions was presented to, the trial judge on June 12, 1919. As the 90 days within which the bill could be legally presented expired on June 11, 1919, the motion to strike the bill of exceptions must prevail. King v. Hill, 163 Ala. 423, 51 South. 15; Cassell’s Mill v. Strater Bros. Grain Co., 166 Ala. 274, 51 South. 969.

The assignments of error based on the record proper are waived, and, the other assignments on the bill of exceptions being eliminated, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

<g£3>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
# C_2009261EN.01000401.xml

| 31.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/4

---

Commission notice on the publication of the electronic templates and file format specifications referred to in Commission Decision 2007/589/EC relating to monitoring and reporting requirements under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community

2009/C 261/04

Commission Decision 2007/589/EC (1) sets out guidelines for the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from the activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) and from activities included pursuant to Article 24(1) of that Directive. Decision 2007/589/EC also sets out guidelines for the monitoring and reporting of tonne-kilometre data from aviation activities for the purpose of an application under Articles 3e or 3f of Directive 2003/87/EC.

1

2

In order to facilitate monitoring and reporting in connection to aviation activities, the Commission may publish standardised electronic templates or file format specifications pursuant to section 6 and section 7 of Annex XIV, and sections 3 and 6 of Annex XV to Decision 2007/589/EC.

These electronic templates and file format specification can be found under the following web address:

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/emission/mrg_templates_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 229, 31.8.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32.

2

---
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                           FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (UNAUDITED)
                          (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                      Year Ended May 31,
                                                  ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                     2004        2003       2002        2001        2000
                                                  ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                               <C>          <C>       <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
  Income before income taxes                        $   541     $   689    $   703     $   786     $   843
Add back:
  Interest expense, net of capitalized interest          64          57         74          75          82
  Amortization of debt issuance costs                     -           -          1           1           1
  Portion of rent expense representative
    of interest factor                                  583         599        594         563         575
                                                  ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------  ----------

Earnings as adjusted                                $ 1,188     $ 1,345    $ 1,372     $ 1,425     $ 1,501
                                                  ==========  ========== ==========  ==========  ==========

Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense, net of capitalized interest     $    64     $    57    $    74     $    75     $    82
  Capitalized interest                                    7          13         23          23          30
  Amortization of debt issuance costs                     -           -          1           1           1
  Portion of rent expense representative
    of interest factor                                  583         599        594         563         575
                                                  ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------  ----------

                                                    $   654     $   669    $   692     $   662     $   688
                                                  ==========  ========== ==========  ==========  ==========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                      1.8         2.0        2.0         2.2         2.2
                                                  ==========  ========== ==========  ==========  ==========
</Table>