alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6654

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SAMUEL ZUNIGA MEDINA, a/k/a Ghost , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr - 00051

- MR

- WCM

- 2 ; 1:18

- cv 00302

- MR )

Submitted : August 22, 2019 Decided: August 27, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Samuel Zuniga Medina , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit

.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Zuniga Medina seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c )(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the dis trict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Medina has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Clear All

        09 September 2022    

                    Kearsarge ARG and 22nd MEU Complete Training with Sweden and NATO                 
                BALTIC SEA - The Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) with the embarked 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) concluded two successful training events with the Swedish Armed Forces and Standing NATO Maritime Group (SNMG) 1 while operating in the Baltic Sea, Sept. 4, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 3-2 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS

We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-177645) and Form S-8 (No. 333-151802) of Unilever N.V. and on Form F-3 (No. 333-177645) and Form S-8 (No. 333-103491-01) of Unilever PLC of our
report dated 28 February 2012 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in this Form 20-F.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2 March, 2012

PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V.

As auditors of Unilever N.V.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ R A J Swaak RA
|R A J Swaak RA    



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    

London, United Kingdom

As auditors of Unilever PLC

2 March, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard A. Azzaro, General Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board reserves its right to further schedule and otherwise regulate the course of this meeting, to recess, reconvene, postpone or adjourn the meeting, and otherwise exercise its authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. 

Dated: April 30, 2001. 

John T. Conway, 

Chairman. 

[FR Doc. 01-11162 Filed 4-30-01; 4:17 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems (1190).                    

*Date/Time:*                         May 17-18, 2001; 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 360, Arlington, VA                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Persons:*                         Drs. Chaun F. Chen & Thomas W. Chapman, Program Directors, Division of Chemical & Transport Systems, NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd. Room 525, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8371.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY 2001 Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Panel of proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information;  financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 1, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-11289  Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# CE2010184EN.01018801.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/188 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/188

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Access to the network: cross-border exchanges in electricity ***II

P6_TA(2009)0243

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 (14546/2/2008 – C6-0022/2009 – 2007/0198(COD))

2010/C 184 E/49

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council common position (14546/2/2008 – C6-0022/2009),

having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0531),

1

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0213/2009),

| 1. | Approves the common position as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position as amended;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, 18.6.2008, P6_TA(2008)0295.

1

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009P6_TC2-COD(2007)0198

Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 22 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 714/2009.)

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

CYNTHIA LOUISE BARTLETT

- McNAMARA,

Appellant,

v.

PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL, LLC; PRETIUM PARTNERS, LLC; PROGRESS
RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 3 LLC; and PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL

PROPERTY MANAGER, LLC,

Appellees.

No. 2D 20 22

- 3029

June 21, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Paul L. Huey

, Judge

.

Michael Valen of Rubenstein Law, P.A., Miami, and Luis G. Figueroa (substituted as counsel of record) and Adam Richardson of Burlington &
Rockenbach, P.A. , West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Meredith Delcamp, Erik R. Matheny, S. Elizabeth King, and Alyssa L. Cory of Shutts & Bowen LLP, for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM

.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM , and ROTHSTEIN

- YOUAKIM , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior publication.
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04365-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/05/2008 Page 20 of 20
Clear All

        21 March 2024    

                    Bataan ARG, 26th MEU(SOC) Return from 8-month Deployment                 
                More than 4,000 Sailors and Marines assigned to the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and embarked 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) (MEU(SOC)) returned to Hampton Roads following an eight and a half-month deployment to the U.S. 2nd, 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operations,            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
LUIS M ANUEL M U R ILLO-LINARES,

Pe t i tione r,
v. W ILLIAM P. B ARR , Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 14-73583 Age n c y No. A089-926-172
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d August 7, 2019 ** B e fore : THOM AS, C hie f Judge , HAW KINS and M c KEOW N, C i rc uit Judge s. Luis Murillo-Lina

re s, a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igrations Appe a ls’ (B IA) orde r de ny ing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ions for a sy l um , withholding of
re m ova l, a

nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Agai nst Torture . W e have jurisdic tion 

# FIL ED AUG 28 2019 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).unde r 8 U.S.C
. § 1252, a nd we de ny

the pe tition. W e re vie w for substa ntia l
e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Ze haty e v . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184- 85 (9th C ir. 2006). Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s c onc lusion tha

t M urillo-Lina

re s fa ile d to e sta

blish hewould bepe rse c ute d on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. Se e Pagay on v . Holde r , 675 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th C ir. 2011) (a pe rsona l dispute , sta nding a lone , doe s not c onstitute pe rse c ution ba se d

on a prote c te d ground); Ze tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th C i r. 2010) (a n a p plic ant’ s “ de sire to be fre e from ha ra ssm e nt by c rim ina ls m otiva te d by the ft or ra

ndom viole n c e by

ga ng m e m b e rs be ars no ne xus to a

prote c te d ground” ). Thus, Murillo-Lina re s’ s a sy lum
and withholding of re

m o va l c la im s fa il. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha

t M urillo-Lina

re s did not e sta

blish tha t he is m ore like ly

tha n not to betorture d by

or with the
c onse n t or a c quie s c e nc e of the gove rnm e nt if re turne d to M e xic o. Se e Ade n v . Holde r , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th C ir. 2009). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DONALD RYDELL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1726

[ October 15, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John J. Murphy, III

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 08

- 21318 CF10A

.

Donald Rydell, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, C ONNER and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-174-CV

MRI COUNTRY BEND INVESTMENT APPELLANTS

FUND, L.P. AND MRI RIVER GLEN

INVESTMENT FUND, L.P.

V.

CAPITOL PAINTING & APPELLEE

CONSTRUCTION, INC.

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellants MRI Country Bend Investment Fund, L.P. and MRI River Glen

Investment Fund, L.P. attempt to appeal from the trial court’s May 7, 2009,

order denying their motion to dissolve pre-judgment writs of garnishment.

Appellee Capitol Painting & Construction, Inc. moves to dismiss the appeal on

the ground that the May 7 order is not an appealable interlocutory order and
2... See Tex. R. App. P. 45 (stating in part that “[i]f the court of appeals

determines that an appeal is frivolous, it may . . . award each prevailing party

just damages”).

3... See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).

4... Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon 2008).

5... Guajardo v. Conwell, 46 S.W.3d 862, 863–64 (Tex. 2001) (dismissal

of appeal of interlocutory order); Anderson v. Long, 52 S.W.3d 385, 386 (Tex.

App.—Fort Worth 2001, no pet.) (same).

2

seeks damages as the prevailing party in a frivolous appeal.2 We dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment.3

Interlocutory orders are not appealable unless they fall within the exceptions

provided by the legislature in section 51.014 of the civil practice and remedies

code.4 None of those exceptions apply here. Therefore, we have no

jurisdiction over the appeal and must dismiss the case.5 Accordingly, we

dismiss this appeal and appellee’s motion for sanctions.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 23, 2009
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Makita Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that, to such officers knowledge:



|1. | The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |        |  |                                                               
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:      June 29, 2012 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Masahiko Goto                                             
|                         |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Masahiko Goto                                                 
|                         |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Representative Director, Chief Executive Officer



|                         |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                  
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:      June 29, 2012 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Yoji Aoki                                                                    
|                         |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Yoji Aoki                                                                        
|                         |  |  |  | Title: |  | Director, General Manager of
Administration Headquarters, Chief Financial
Officer
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-5 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-5 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 20.1 ANNUAL AGGREGATE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS STATEMENT
MELLON BANK PREMIUM FINANCE LOAN MASTER TRUST SERIES 2001-1
ANNUAL PERIOD ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2003 ANNUAL HOLDERS DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY Pursuant to Section 5.2, Servicer does hereby declare to the Trustee
the following distributions for the calendar year 2003 as set forth
below: Interest Payments  A.
    
    Pursuant to subsection 4.11(g); 1.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Class A Holders
    
    
    6,350,906.272.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Class B Holders
    
    
    334,984.723.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder
    
    
    628,521.25
 Principal Payments  B.
    
    Pursuant to subsection 4.11(h)(i); 1.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Class A Holders
    
    $
    0.002.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Class B Holders
    
    $
    0.003.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder
    
    $
    0.00
 AFCO CREDIT CORPORATION, as ServicerBy /s/ C. Leonard OConnellName: C. Leonard OConnellTitle: Senior Vice President & Chief Financial
Officer
 E-2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         408,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,957,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   146,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,299,000
<PP&E>                                      70,653,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (18,375,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,875,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          797,000
<BONDS>                                     48,008,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    37,068,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (26,319,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,875,000<F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,820,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,943,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               325,000<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               185,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,364,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,448,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,448,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,448,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.93)
<FN>
<F1>includes $3,321,000 of Minority Intrest in Joint Venture
<F2>represents Minority interest portion of Current net loss
</FN>
        

</TABLE>