alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009311EN.01002501.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/25

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China: modification of the name of a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate

2009/C 311/10

Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty, imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 926/2009 of 24 September 2009 (1).

1

Handan Precise Seamless Steel Pipes Co., Ltd., a company located in the People's Republic of China, whose exports to the Community of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel are subject to an anti-dumping duty of 27,2 % imposed pursuant to Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 926/2009, has informed the Commission that on 3 December 2008, it has changed its name to Hebei Hongling Seamless Steel Pipes Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

The company has argued that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to the company under its previous name of Handan Precise Seamless Steel Pipes Co., Ltd.

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Regulation (EC) No 926/2009. Therefore, the reference to Handan Precise Seamless Steel Pipes Co., Ltd. should be read as Hebei Hongling Seamless Steel Pipes Manufacturing Co., Ltd., in the Annex of Regulation (EC) No 926/2009.

The Taric additional code A950 previously attributed to Handan Precise Seamless Steel Pipes Co., Ltd. shall apply to Hebei Hongling Seamless Steel Pipes Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ L 262, 6.10.2009, p. 19.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 813 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.813

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
    Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 306 
East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, T. Kendall Hunt, certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/ T. Kendall Hunt                                           
|T. Kendall Hunt                                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|May 6, 2011
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7794** 

NATHANIEL L. GAITHER, a/k/a Nathaniel Gaither , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 5 : 13

- cv - 00 108

- RMG )

Submitted : March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Nathaniel L. Gaither , Appellant Pro Se. Mar shall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel L. Gaither seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions to recuse the magistrate judge, to transfer the case to a district court judge, and accepting the magistrate judge’s ruling denying his motion to compel discovery . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Gaither seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the Direct 
Deposit Sign Up Form.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 11, 2001, 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form and instructions should be directed to Vicki S. 
Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 
26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Direct Deposit Sign Up Form.
    OMB Number: 1535-0128.
    Form Number: PD F 5396.
    Abstract: The information is requested to process payment data to a 
financial institution.
    Current Actions: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Individuals.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 20,000.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,400.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: May 2, 2001.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 01-11504 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
Clear All

        17 February 2024    

                    USS John L. Canley Commissioning Recognizes Legacy of Vietnam Veterans and Medal of Honor Recipient                 
                USS John L. Canley Commissioning Recognizes Legacy of Vietnam Veterans and Medal of Honor RecipientFrom Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs            

        10 August 2023    

                    USS Mobile Bay Decommissions, Honors 36 Years of Service                 
                SAN DIEGO – USS Mobile Bay (CG 53) honored more than three decades of naval service during a decommissioning ceremony at Naval Base San Diego, Aug. 10.            

        21 May 2022    

                    USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul (LCS 21) Commissions                 
                The U.S. Navy commissioned its newest littoral combat ship USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul (LCS 21) in Duluth, Minnesota, May 21, 2022.            

        14 May 2022    

                    USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. Commissions                 
                CHARLESTON, S.C. -- The Navy commissioned its newest Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Frank E. Petersen, Jr. (DDG 121), May 14 in Charleston, South Carolina.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Third Department,

September, 1989

(September 14, 1989)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *961Timothy S. Bidwell, Appellant.

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered August 16, 1985, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant was indicted for assault in the second degree as the result of an altercation on December 29, 1984 in the City of Binghamton, Broome County. Defendant was specifically charged with causing physical injury by kicking the victim with his shoes, the dangerous instrument required under Penal Law § 120.05 (2). Following the prosecution’s case, defendant moved for dismissal on the ground that there was no proof that he was wearing shoes or kicked the victim with his shoes as alleged in the indictment. County Court initially reserved decision, ultimately denying the motion. Defendant was convicted as charged and sentenced to an indeterminate term of incarceration of 1 to 3 years. This appeal followed.

Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his dismissal motion. We disagree. The victim testified that he was kicked ”[h]ard”. The incident occurred at the end of December and there was testimony that the temperature was cold, thereby foreclosing the possibility that the attacker had bare feet. The victim required 70 stitches to repair his injuries. From these facts, the jury could have concluded that defendant’s kicking was done while wearing shoes. We note that defendant’s brother, testifying on defendant’s behalf, admitted during cross-examination that he had previously testified that defendant was wearing cowboy boots on the night of the attack. Accordingly, we find no error in County Court’s denial of defendant’s motion for dismissal.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David M. Oliver, ChiefFinancial Officer of Arden Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge(1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year endedDecember 28, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | /s/    | DAVID M.  OLIVER         |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Name:  |   | David M.  Oliver         |
|   | Title: |   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  |   | March 20,  2003          |

 

This certification accompaniesthis Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shallnot, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,685
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                       946
<INVENTORY>                                     14,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,284
<PP&E>                                         107,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,210
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,074
<SALES>                                        154,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,656
<CGS>                                           99,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   370
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,795
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,043
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,043
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.45
        

</TABLE>
(82 South. 894)

#### IRWIN v. SHOEMAKER et al.

(3 Div. 411.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 12, 1919.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Conecuh County; A. E. Gamble, Judge.

Hybart, Hare & Ratcliffe, of Monroeville, for appellant.

J. . S. Stearns and Hamilton & Page, all of Evergreen, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 8 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Clear All

        23 February 2023    

                    HSC-22 Conducts Final Flight                 
                The “Sea Knights” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 22 conducted their final flight on Wednesday, Feb. 15, 2023, almost 16 years after their first flight in 2006.            

        16 May 2022    

                    Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 22 Holds Aerial Change of Command                 
                The “Sea Knights” of Helicopter Sea Squadron (HSC) 22, stationed at Naval Station Norfolk, held an aerial change of command ceremony, May 5.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0461 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NICOLE ABENICIA NOLI ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 8 , 2021 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2021

11/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0461
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1296

JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

MAYOR MCKINLEY L. PRICE, DDS, In his individual capacity, as a person acting under color of state law; CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS VIRGINIA, In its individual capacity as a person, acting under color of state law; FORMER CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS MR. RICHARD W. MYERS, In his individual capacity as a person, acting under color of state law; CITY OF NEWPOR T NEWS VIRGINIA POLICE OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE, In their individual capacities as persons, acting under color of state law; CITY OF HAMPTON VIRGINIA, In its individual capacity as a person, acting under color of state law; CHIEF OF POLICE MR. TERRY L. SULT FOR THE CITY OF HAMPTON VIRGINIA, In his individual capacity, as a person acting under color of state law; CITY OF HAMPTON VIRGINIA POLICE TECHNICAL POLICE OFFICER(S) JOHN/JANE DOE(S), In their individual capacities, as persons acting under color of state law; CITY OF HAMPTON VIRGINIA POLICE OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE(S), In their individual capacities as persons acting under color of state law; FBI AGENT MRS./MS. KATHERINE ANDREWS, Former special agent in charge of the Newport News field office, in her individ ual capacity, as a person acting under color of federal and state law; FBI NEWPORT NEWS FIELD OFFICE JOHN/JANE DOE(S) TECHNICAL AND FIELD AGENT(S), In their individual capacities, as persons acting under color of federal and state law

,

Defendants

- App ellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 4:18

- cv

- 00001

- AWA

- DEM )2 Submitted : May 17 , 2018 Decided: May 18, 2018

Before KING and AGEE

, Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

John M. Dickson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

John M. Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil

complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Dickson v. Price

, No. 4:18

- cv

- 00001

- AWA

- DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 13,

2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Clear All

        14 February 2024    

                    Navy SEALs Forge Alliance with Cypriot Navy Underwater Demolition Team in Eastern Mediterranean                 
                In a constant demonstration of partnership in the Eastern Mediterranean, U.S. East Coast-based Naval Special Warfare Operators (SEALs) and Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewmen (SWCC) collaborated with Cypriot Navy Underwater Demolition Team (MYK) partners Jan. 22 – Feb. 14, 2024, refining their            

        13 December 2023    

                    Naval Special Warfare Enhances Allied Defense with Romanian Special Operations Forces                 
                East-Coast based Naval Special Warfare Operators (SEALs) and the 164th Romanian Naval Special Operations Forces (ROUSOF) conducted training on maritime interdiction operations, special reconnaissance, and special operations tactics to enhance allied defense throughout the European region. The joint            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### BELLEVUE v. SKINNER.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

April 13, 1894.)

Action by Frederick A. Bellevue against Halcyon Skinner.

No opinion. Motion granted by default, with $10 costs and disbursements.