alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Brown, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Haft, J.), rendered on or about November 2, 1984, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Rosenberger, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Charles F. Cargile, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Newport Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule
15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/    CHARLES F.
CARGILECharles F. CargileVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Newport Corporation and will be retained by Newport Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: Distance Learning/Training Technology 
Subcommittee of the Army Education Advisory Committeee.
    Date: 22-23 May, 2001.
    Place: Intel Corporation, Phoenix, AZ.
    Time: 0800-1630 on 22 May, 2001; 0800-1200 on 23 May 2001.
    Proposed Agenda: Dr. Rod Ibieta, Training Project Manager, Intel 
Corporation, will conduct presentations that focus on Intel initiatives 
in interactive training, administration and management of courses, and 
discuss future programs planned for employee training and education.
    Key members of the Distance Learning/Training Technology 
Subcommittee who have made significant contributions to the overall 
mission of the subcommittee and the Army's Distance Learning Program, 
will be recognized with service awards.
    Purpose of the Meeting: The members will advise the Assistant 
Deputy Chief of Staff (ADCST), HQ Training and Doctrine Command 
(TRADOC), on matters pertaining to education and training technologies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All communications regarding this 
subcommittee should be addressed to Mr. Richard Karpinski, at 
Commander, Headquarters TRADOC, ATTN: ATTG-CF (Mr. Karpinski), Fort 
Monroe, VA 23651-5000; telephone number (757) 788-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meeting of the advisory committee is open to 
the public. Because of restricted meeting space, attendance will be 
limited to those persons who have notified the Advisory Committee 
Management Office in writing at least five days prior to the meeting of 
their intention to attend. Contact Mr. Karpinski (757-788-5531) for 
meeting agenda and specific locations.
    Any member of the public may file a written statement with the 
committee before, during or after the meeting. To the extent that time 
permits, the committee chairman may allow public presentations or oral 
statements at the meeting.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-11515 Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
(85 South. 924)

#### SWAIN v. LETSON.

(8 Div. 159.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 3, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Clear All

        30 April 2021    

#                     CNIC, USFFC to Conduct Hurricane/Disaster Response Exercise                 

                HURREX/CG 21 is conducted over a two-week period with this year's exercise running from May 3-14. The first week simulates a storm system along U.S. Atlantic coast and the second week shifts focus to procedures for recovery from severe weather events.The annual hurricane preparedness/disaster            

        08 April 2021    

#                     CNO and Mrs. Gilday Release Month of the Military Child Video Message                 

                Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday and his wife Linda released a video message for the Month of the Military Child, April 8.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We hereby consent to the use of our name and the information from our report regarding our estimates of reserves and future net revenues from the production and
sale of those reserves in the Annual Report on 10-K of Pogo Producing Company for the year ended December 31, 2003, and to the incorporation by reference thereof into Pogo Producing
Company's previously filed Registration Statement Nos. 33-54969, 333-04233, 333-72129, 333-75105, 333-75105-01,
333-75105-02, 333-74861, 333-42426, 333-42428, 333-60800, 333-67324, 333-59426, 333-65548,
333-86856, 333-98205 and 333-102775.

|                                 |  | /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY                
|-------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                                 |  | RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
|Houston, Texas
February 24, 2004 |  |                                        

---
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE


PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Daniel
      L. Coury,Sr, the Chairman and acting Chief Executive Officer of YP Corp.,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on
      Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of YP Corp.





Date:
                February 14, 2006
            */s/
                Daniel L. Coury,Sr*Daniel
                L. Coury,SrChairman
                and acting Chief Executive Officer




I,
        W.
        Chris Broquist, the Chief Financial Officer of YP Corp., certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter
        ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
        in
        such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
        the
        financial condition and results of operations of YP Corp.





Date:
                February 14, 2006
            */s/
                W. Chris Broquist*W.
                Chris BroquistChief
                Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Proposed Information Collection Request Submitted for Public 
Comment and Recommendations; Correction

SUMMARY: In notice document 01-11011 (66 FR 22009) beginning on page 
22009 in the issue of Wednesday, May 2, 2001, make the following 
correction:
    On page 22009 in the second column, the Background should be 
changed to read: ``Background: Form ETA-9042, Petition for NAFTA 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance, establishes the format which has 
been used by the Governor to facilitate such filings.''
    On page 22009 in the third column, under Current Actions, the Title 
should be changed to read: ``Petition for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance.''
    On page 22009 in the third column the OMB Number should be changed 
to read: ``1205-0342.''
    On page 22009 in the third column the Agency Number should be 
changed to read: ``ETA 9042 and ETA 9042-1.''
    On page 22009 in the third column the Affected Public should read: 
``Individuals or Households.''

    Dated: May 4, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-11632 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21920-21921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1335-000]


Magnolia Energy, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 26, 2001.
    Magnolia Energy, L.P. (Magnolia) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Magnolia will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions at market-based rates. Magnolia also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Magnolia 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Magnolia.
    On April 5, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Magnolia should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of

[[Page 21921]]

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Magnolia is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Magnolia's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 7, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at 
http://www.fer.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10906 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 32 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 3-2 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 3-2 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 3-2 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 3-2 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-4 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-4 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 62-4 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Bloomfield, Appellant.

Harvey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered May 19, 1988, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant, an inmate at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, was tried for assaulting a correction officer who had entered defendant’s prison cell in order to extinguish a fire. Following a jury trial, defendant was found guilty .of assault in the second degree and sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of *SVi*to 7 years’ imprisonment, to be served consecutively with the sentence defendant was then serving. This appeal followed.

Defendant principally contends that County Court erred by denying both his request for a change of venue in his case and for a stay of the trial pending such an application. Significantly, we note that both applications were improper because they were brought before the wrong court using improper procedures *(see,*CPL 230.20, 230.30). However, assuming these motions were properly brought, we find no error in their denial. Defendant based his change of venue request upon the fact that some of the jurors indicated during voir dire that they had read a newspaper clipping in the Elmira Star Gazette briefly describing the upcoming trial. Of all the jurors who said they had read the article, all expressed an ability to fairly judge the case based upon the evidence alone *(see, People v Ryan,*151 AD2d 528). Notably, the only prospective juror who equivocated on the subject was excused for cause and that was principally because that juror had also heard about the incident from his son, a correction officer. As aptly noted by County Court, the only remotely prejudicial aspect of the article in question was a reference to what defendant’s possible punishment might be if convicted. Under these circumstances we cannot endorse defendant’s contention that *988pretrial publicity made a "fair and impartial” trial impossible (CPL 230.20 [2]; *see, People v Zehner,*112 AD2d 465, *lv denied*66 NY2d 619).

Defendant’s remaining arguments have been examined and have been found to be unpersuasive.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 22 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 22 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 4 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR Document 4 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Lawrence J. Mertz et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Hilary P. Bradford et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendants’ motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate special circumstances warranting the presence of either a medical representative or a stenographer at physical examinations to be conducted by doctors designated for that purpose by defendants. We repeat that the examining room should not " 'be turned into a hearing room with lawyers and *963stenographers from both sides participating’ ” *(Casali v Phillips,*145 AD2d 941, 942, quoting *Jakubowski v Lengen,*86 AD2d 398, 401). We also repeat that "where valid reasons exist, a party may object to the physician designated by defendant and seek to have defendant select another doctor to conduct the examination” *(Casali v Phillips, supra,*at 942; *see also, Rosenblitt v Rosenblitt,*107 AD2d 292, 295).

Finally, we note that while plaintiffs purport to appeal from an order denying their motion to permit the presence of their attorney at the physical examinations, no such order appears in the record. The attorney may attend *(see, Jakubowski v Lengen, supra).*(Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — discovery.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
# C_2009043EN.01000101.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 16 February 2009

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Deutsche Bundesbank

(ECB/2009/3)

(2009/C 43/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB's Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB's Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Deutsche Bundesbank's current external auditors will end after the audit for the financial year 2008. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Deutsche Bundesbank's current external auditors will end after the audit for the financial year 2008. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2009.

| (3) | The Deutsche Bundesbank has selected Ernst & Young AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft as its external auditors for the financial years 2009 to 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Deutsche Bundesbank has selected Ernst & Young AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft as its external auditors for the financial years 2009 to 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Ernst & Young AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft should be appointed as the external auditor of the Deutsche Bundesbank for the financial years 2009 to 2014.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 16 February 2009.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID CHAVIRA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-15-00128-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D03609)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until November 19, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Joseph D. Vasquez, the Appellant’s Attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 19, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 01-06]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, DOD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated July 21, 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 01-06 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: May 4, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 23892)          ( print page 23893)          ( print page 23894)    

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M

[FR Doc. 01-11758 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-C