alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Axsys Technologies, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen W. Bershad,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the Report.

February 27,2006
| /s/ Stephen W. Bershad  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Stephen W. Bershad      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20214

Conference Calendar

MILTON EARL CARBE

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CV-4055

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Milton Earl Carbe, federal prisoner # 66325-079, appeals the dismissalfor

lack of jurisdiction of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged his

convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and

possession with intent to distribute cocaine. In his petition, he argues that he

is confined illegally because the speedy-trial waiver he executed prior to trial

was invalidated by Zedner v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 1976 (2006). 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-20214

2

The proper vehicle for attacking errors that occurred during or before

sentencing is a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Tolliver v. Dobre, 211 F.3d 876,

877-78 (5th Cir. 2000). Under the savings clause of § 2255, however, if a

prisoner can demonstrate that the § 2255 remedy would be “inadequate or

ineffective to test the legality of his detention,” he may be permitted to bring a

habeas corpus claim pursuant to § 2241. Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243

F.3d 893, 901 (5th Cir. 2001) (emphasis removed). The savings clause applies

to a claim that is based upon a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision

which establishes that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent

offense and that was foreclosed by circuit law at the time when the claim should

have been raised in the petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion. Id. at

904.

Carbe fails to show that Zedner, which was decided in the context of a

direct appeal, applies retroactively or that it rendered any offense of conviction

“nonexistent.” Thus, he has failed to demonstrate that the § 2255 remedies were

ineffective and inadequate. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Carbe’s motions for appointment of counsel, for bail pending appeal, and to

supplement the record are denied.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 34 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I,Charles N. Martin, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”),as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                       of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                      Charles N. Martin, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay 11, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
# C_2009043EN.01000701.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 43/06)

| Aid No | XR 40/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Merseyside Sub Region |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Merseyside Special Area and Key Site Investment Grant Scheme |
| Legal basis | Local Government Act 2000 Section 2 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | GBP 2 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 15 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 19.2.2007 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for regional investment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Lead Authority: Metropolitan Borough of Wirral
  Other partner Authorities: Sefton, Liverpool City, Knowlsey and St Helens |
| Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme | http://www.investmerseyside.com/displaypage.asp?page_key=76 |
| Other information | — |

Aid No

XR 40/07

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Merseyside Sub Region

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

ad hoc

Merseyside Special Area and Key Site Investment Grant Scheme

Legal basis

Local Government Act 2000 Section 2

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

GBP 2 million

Maximum aid intensity

15 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

19.2.2007

Duration

31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for regional investment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Lead Authority: Metropolitan Borough of Wirral

Other partner Authorities: Sefton, Liverpool City, Knowlsey and St Helens

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

http://www.investmerseyside.com/displaypage.asp?page_key=76

Other information

—

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Live Ventures Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2019,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon Isaac, the President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, to the best of my knowledge and belief, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



| | /s/ Jon Isaac
        Jon Isaac
        President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 14, 2019



The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report as a separate disclosure
document of the Company or the certifying officers.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 20 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 20 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### WRIGHT, Respondent, v. DENISTON et al., Appellants.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

June 4, 1894.)

Appeal from special term. Action by Andrew S. Wright against Benjamin F. Deniston and John C. Shaw and others. From an order directing compliance with certain terms of a judgment at equity term as an alternative to the defendants being adjudged for contempt, *1152defendants Deniston and Shaw appeal. Gratz Nathan and John 0/ Shaw, for appellants. Charles B. Meyer, for respondent.

GIEGERICH, J.

Appellant Deniston -claimed that the order appealed from affected a substantial right, in that it required a transfer to plaintiff of the certificate deposited with the clerk, this transfer being an essential part of the relief granted to plaintiff, as against appellants, by the judgment appealed from. The rights of Shaw and Cuthbert, the parties affected personally by the order, are not before us for determination; the appeal as to the former having been dismissed upon the argument, and the latter having failed to appeal. The defendant Deniston was not a party to the proceeding in which this order was made, but points of distinction between the present case and that of Ross v. Wigg, 100 N. Y. 246, 3 N. E. 180, may be found, in view of the nature of this appellant’s interest Be that as it may, our affirmance of the judgment in this action concludes discussion as to the substantial right claimed to have been affected, and examination into the merits of the order would in no event be of beneficial effect to appellant. Appeal dismissed, without costs.
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 24.2



POWER OF ATTORNEY



I, Inder Tallur, a Director of Comdial Corporation, a Delaware corporation, do hereby constitute and appoint Kenneth M. Clinebell and Anne Prillaman, or either of them,
my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities (including without limitation, as Director of Comdial), to sign Comdials Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, with all exhibits thereto, and any and all documents in connection therewith, hereby granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and
authority to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done, and hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney shall not
terminate upon my disability.



|       |  |                 
|------ |  | ----------------
|Dated: |  | 03/26/05        
|       | 
|       |  | /s/ Inder Tallur
|       |  | Inder Tallur    



73
# C_2009148EN.01001501.xml

| 30.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/15

---

Extract from the Decision concerning Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg S.A. pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

2009/C 148/08

EXTENSION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE ADMINISTRATORS OF KAUPTHING BANK LUXEMBOURG S.A.

EXTENSION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE ADMINISTRATORS OF KAUPTHING BANK LUXEMBOURG S.A.

By judgment delivered in open court on 8 June 2009, the Second Chamber of the District Court of Luxembourg, sitting in commercial matters, having heard the submissions, in closed session, of the administrators and the representative of the limited liability company Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg S.A., the representatives of the Financial Sector Supervisory Commission and the representative of the public prosecutor, supplements the judgments delivered by the District Court of Luxembourg on 9 and 31 October 2008 and 2 April 2009 and the judgment delivered by the Court of Appeal of Luxembourg on 28 January 2009 as follows:

‘The duration of the stay of payment granted to the limited liability company Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg S.A. is extended until 10 July 2009, 24:00 hours’.

An application may not be made by the party or by a third party to set aside this judgment.

The Administrators

PricewaterhouseCoopers S.àr.l., represented by Emmanuelle Caruel-Henniaux, and Franz Fayot, lawyer

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Robert G. Deuster, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Newport Corporation
(the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule

13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: March 13, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert G. Deuster               
|                     |  | Robert G. Deuster                   
|                     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)       

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Newport
Corporation and will be retained by Newport Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.