alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 10.v

                            SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE
               HUFFY CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL/EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN


         WHEREAS, Huffy Corporation (the "Sponsor") maintains the Huffy
Corporation Supplemental/Excess Benefit Plan (the "Plan") effective January 1,
1998; and

         WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Sponsor adopts the following amendment to the Plan
effective as of December 1, 1997;

I.       Article III of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following 
         paragraph to the end of the Article:

                  For the purpose of calculating the Supplemental/Excess Benefit
                  of Participant Richard L. Molen ("Molen"), the Accrued
                  Retirement Pension, as determined for purposes of clause (i)
                  of this first paragraph of this Article, shall be determined
                  as if Molen had remained an Eligible Employee and had
                  continued to earn Compensation (including regular
                  compensation, at the rate in effect on December 18, 1997, and
                  any bonus or incentive compensation which Molen would have
                  received) and Years of Credited Service until incurring a
                  Severance from Service on December 31, 1998.

II. In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has caused this instrument to be
executed as of this 22nd day of December, 1997.



                                    HUFFY CORPORATION

                                    By:    /s/ Nancy A. Michaud
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                    Title: Vice President - General Counsel
                                           ------------------------------------
                                              and Secretary
Clear All

        25 January 2024    

                    Medical Forces Atlantic Reserve leadership highlight importance of mission readiness                 
                PORTSMOUTH, Va. - Reserve Component Naval Medical Forces Atlantic (RC NMFL) held a 4-day annual leadership sync for 20 commands within the region that focused on Navy Medicine and Navy Reserve priorities on board Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads-Portsmouth Annex, Jan. 18-21.Nearly 50 Navy            

        03 May 2023    

                    Marksmanship Skills Provide Mission Readiness and Mentorship                 
                Hospital Corpsman 1st Class Axel Narvaez was awarded the U.S. Navy Pistol Excellence-In-Competition Badge (Bronze) after a match in Virginia Beach, Virginia, in which he scored a 90.87 percent. As a result, he took second place in the Carry Optics division, where shooters possess a pistol without            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT (3)(i)(b)

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                        TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                          OF OAKRIDGE EXPLORATION, INC.


ARTICLE ONE:  The name of the Corporation is Oakridge Exploration, Inc.

ARTICLE TWO: The following amendment ("Amendment") to Article I of the Articles
of Incorporation of the Corporation was adopted by the shareholders of the
Corporation at its annual meeting of shareholders held on October 21, 1982:

                                   "ARTICLE I

                                      Name

         The name of the Corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation") is
Oakridge Energy, Inc."

ARTICLE THREE: As of the date that the Amendment was adopted by the shareholders
of the Corporation, the Corporation had issued and outstanding a total of
4,036,315 shares of its common stock, $.04 par value ("Common Stock"). The
Common Stock is the Corporation's only class of stock, and all 4,036,315
outstanding shares of Common Stock were entitled to vote on the Amendment.

ARTICLE FOUR: A total of 3,026,015 shares voted in favor of the Amendment, 8,100
shares voted against the Amendment and 8,950 shares abstained from voting on the
Amendment.

         EXECUTED this 21st day of October, 1982.

                                             OAKRIDGE EXPLORATION, INC.


                                             By  /s/  Noel Pautsky
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                Noel Pautsky, President



                                             By  /s/ Harvey Lee Ickert
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                Harvey Lee Ickert, Secretary



<PAGE>


STATE OF TEXAS                  )
                                )
COUNTY OF WICHITA               )

         On this 21st day of October, 1982, personally appeared before me Noel
Pautsky and Harvey Lee Ickert, known to me to be the President and Secretary,
respectively, of Oakridge Exploration, Inc., and authorized to execute the
foregoing Amendment by resolution of the shareholders of Oakridge Exploration,
Inc., and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of
the Corporation and that the Corporation executed the same.



                                      /s/ Lesley B. Chasteen
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Notary Public in and for the State of Texas

My Commission Expires:

         8-4-84
------------------------



                                       2
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05343-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009178EN.01000501.xml

| 31.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/5

---

Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009 under certain quotas opened by the Community for pigmeat products

2009/C 178/02

Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2009 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2009 do not, for quotas 09.4038, 09.4170 and 09.4204, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2009; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009
  (kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4038 | 3 396 840 |
| 09.4170 | 1 180 500 |
| 09.4204 | 1 156 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2009

(kg)

09.4038

3 396 840

09.4170

1 180 500

09.4204

1 156 000

---
# C_2009074EN.01000101.xml

| 28.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/1

---

Commission notice on the quantity of certain products in the milk and milk products sector available for the second half of 2009 under certain quotas opened by the Community

(2009/C 74/01)

When import licences were allocated for the first half of 2009 for certain quotas mentioned in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 (1), the licence applications covered quantities less than those available for the products concerned. Therefore, the quantity available for each quota for the period 1 July to 31 December 2009 should be calculated taking account of the unallocated quantities resulting from Commission Regulation (EC) No 1224/2008 (2) (of 9 December 2008 determining the extent to which the applications for import licences submitted in November 2008 for certain dairy products under certain tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 can be accepted) and of applications for import licences lodged in the first ten days of November 2008 for butter originating in New Zealand under quotas 09.4195 and 09.4182.

1

2

The quantities available for the period 1 July to 31 December 2009 for the second half of the year of importation for certain quotas referred to in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 are indicated hereunder.

---

(1)  OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 29.

1

(2)  OJ L 331, 10.12.2008, p. 5.

2

---

ANNEX

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

---------------------------------------------------------------x 

UNITHAI MARITIME LIMITED, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : 07 CV 5730 (BSJ) 

 : 

v. : 

 : 

RP LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. and : 

R. PIYARELALL INTERNATIONAL : 

PVT. LTD. : 

 Defendants. : 

---------------------------------------------------------------x

DECLARATION OF LAWRENCE G. COHEN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT 

Lawrence G. Cohen declares as follows: 

1. I am a partner with the law firm of Vandeventer Black LLP, attorneys for the 

Plaintiff, as well as a member in good standing of the bars of New York and Virginia and 

admitted to practice in this Honorable Court. 

2. I submit this Declaration in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Verified 

Complaint against RP Logistics Pvt. Ltd. and R. Piyarelall International Pvt. Ltd. (collectively 

referred to as “Defendants”), filed on July 25, 2007, to which this Declaration is attached. 

3. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), on July 19, 2007, counsel for the 

Plaintiff contacted counsel for the Defendants and requested consent to file an Amended Verified 

Complaint. 

4. By return correspondence dated July 19, 2007, counsel for the Defendants herein 

indicated he would not consent to the filing of an Amended Verified Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 15-2 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
5. In the interests of justice, Plaintiff respectfully requests it be permitted to correct 

the scrivener’s contained in Paragraph 4 of the Verified Complaint. Paragraph 4 of the Verified 

Complaint incorrectly states that "Plaintiff was, at all relevant times, the demise owner of the 

vessel...." Due to a scrivener’s error, Plaintiff actually intended Paragraph 4 of the Verified 

Complaint to read "Plaintiff was, at all relevant times, the disponent owner of the vessel..." 

6. The filing of this Amended Verified Complaint will not cause prejudice to the 

Defendants, the Plaintiff has not acted in bad faith, and the amendment is not futile. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on July 25, 2007. 

/S/Lawrence G. Cohen_____

Lawrence G. Cohen 

Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 15-2 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on July 25, 2007, a copy of the foregoing DECLARATION OF 

LAWRENCE G. COHEN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT was filed electronically and served by mail on anyone 

unable to accept electronic filing. Notice of this filing will be sent by e-mail to all parties by 

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system or by mail to anyone unable to accept electronic 

filing. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

 By: /S/Lawrence G. Cohen______ 

 Lawrence G. Cohen 

Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 15-2 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 825 

To direct the Secretary of Education to extend the same level of increased 

flexibility to all rural local educational agencies under part A of title 

I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2009 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Education to extend the same 

level of increased flexibility to all rural local educational 

agencies under part A of title I of the Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Education 

5 Equality and Improvement Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 825 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED FLEXIBILITY FOR RURAL LOCAL EDU2 CATIONAL AGENCIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of Education 

4 takes any action (whether by regulation, guidance, or oth5 erwise) to authorize increased flexibility for any category 

6 of rural local educational agencies, the Secretary shall ex7 tend the same level of increased flexibility to all rural local 

8 educational agencies. 

9 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

10 (1) INCREASED FLEXIBILITY.—The term ‘‘in11 creased flexibility’’ means increased flexibility under, 

12 or facilitated compliance with, part A of title I of the 

13 Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 

14 (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.). 

15 (2) RURAL LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY.— 

16 The term ‘‘rural local educational agency’’ includes 

17 any local educational agency described in section 

18 6211(b) or section 6221(b)(1) of the Elementary 

19 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

20 7345(b), 7351(b)(1)). 

21 (c) APPLICATION.—This section applies to any action 

22 described in subsection (a) that occurs on or after January 

23 8, 2002 (the date of the enactment of the No Child Left 

24 Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–110)). 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1 Certification required under Section 906
             of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



                         CERTIFICATION
                         _____________

STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the President and Chairman of the Board of
Pismo Coast Village, Inc., do hereby certify, in compliance with
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that the periodic report which this Certification accompanies
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in said periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the issuer.

Date: June 18, 2009                     JERALD PETTIBONE
                                        Jerald Pettibone
                                            President


                                 1

<PAGE>
#### Mary JOHNSON; James Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ron WALL; Jess Carson; Bruce Barnett, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-35528.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 24, 2013.

Filed June 5, 2013.

Allen Yacura, Stepovich *&*Vacura Law Office, Fairbanks, AK, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

David Trevor Jones, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Alaska Attorney General, Anchorage, AK, for Defendants-Appellees.

*623Before: TASHIMA, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Appellants Johnson brought suit against officer-defendants under 8 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged judicial deception during the acquisition of a search warrant, which resulted in the search of their home. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the officer-defendants on the basis of qualified immunity. We review the district court’s decision de novo. *Chism, v. Washington,*661 F.3d 380, 386 (9th Cir.2011).

For the Johnsons’ judicial deception claim to survive a motion for summary judgment on the grounds of qualified immunity, they “must 1) make a substantial showing of [the officers’] deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth and 2) establish that, but for the[ir] dishonesty, the [challenged search] would not have occurred.” *Chism,*661 F.3d at 386 (quoting *Liston v. Cnty. of Riverside,*120 F.3d 965, 973 (9th Cir.1997). Here, not only did they fail to make a substantial showing that the officers made deliberate falsehoods or displayed a reckless disregard for the truth, but there was also sufficient evidence remaining to establish probable cause even after excising the facts in dispute. See *Liston,*120 F.3d at 972 (citing *Franks v. Delaware,*438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978)). The district court did not err when it granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

Additionally, we lack jurisdiction to review the issue of attorney’s fees. “In a civil case ... the notice of appeal required by Rule 3 must be filed with the district court within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from.” Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). “[A] supplemental notice of appeal is required for us to have jurisdiction over an attorneys’ fees issue that becomes final subsequent to the initial notice of appeal.” *Hunt v. City of Los Angeles,*638 F.3d 703, 719 (9th Cir.2011) (citation and emphasis omitted); *see also Whitaker v. Garcetti,*486 F.3d 572, 585 (9th Cir.2007) (“A party wishing to challenge the [later] attorney fees decision ‘must file a notice of appeal, or an amended notice of appeal’ specifying its appeal of that decision.”). No further action was taken here after the district court ruled on attorney’s fees.

We AFFIRM the district court’s decision dismissing appellants’ claim on summary judgment and DISMISS the appeal of the district court’s award of attorney’s fees for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 16-2      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief
Executive Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                               /s/ David G. Derrick
                                              ---------------------
                                              David G. Derrick
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              RemoteMDx, Inc.

                                              /s/ Michael G. Acton
                                              --------------------
                                              Michael G. Acton
                                              Chief Financial Officer



Dated: August 14, 2006
Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
# CE2010184EN.01018301.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/183 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/183

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Protocol on the Implementation of the Alpine Convention in the field of Transport *

P6_TA(2009)0230

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, of behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol on the Implementation of the Alpine Convention in the field of Transport (Transport Protocol) (COM(2008)0895 – C6-0073/2009 – 2008/0262(CNS))

2010/C 184 E/44

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2008)0895),

having regard to Article 71 and the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0073/2009),

having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0219/2009),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
No. 75-1450.

No. 75-1451.

No. 75-1487.

No. 75-1505.

No. 75-1506.

No. 75-1581.

No. 75-1598.

No. 75-1621.

No. 75-1667.

No. 75-1743.

No. 75-1815.

No. 75-1825.

#### Department of Social Services of Iowa et al. *v.*West Height Manor, Inc.; and Burns, Commissioner, Department of Social Services of Iowa, et al. *v.*Hutchison Nursing Home, Inc., et al., Smith *v.*United States, Evans et al. *v.*United States, A. W. Thompson, Inc. *v.*National Labor Relations Board, Hondo Drilling Co. *v.*National Labor Relations Board, Leemon *v.*Illinois, Global Marine Development of California, Inc. *v.*National Labor Relations Board et al., Slovak *v.*Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, United States *v.*Pomponio et al., Doyle et al. *v.*Sheehan, Gabriel *v.*United States et *al.,*Littrell *v.*United States,

*ante,*p. 884;

*ante,*p. 817;

*ante,*p. 818;

*ante,*p. 818;

*ante,*p. 818;

*ante,*p. 804;

*ante,*p. 821;

*ante,*p. 868;

*ante,*p. 10;

*ante,*p. 870;

ante, p. 877; and

*ante,*p. 831. Petitions for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 15.1

LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Hypercom Corporation

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-40457, 333-40459, 333-40461, 333-40333 and 333-43622) of our
report dated July 25, 2001 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements of Hypercom Corporation that are included in its Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.

                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
August 13, 2001