alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 829 

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained at Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities in North Carolina or to house 

such individuals at such facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2009 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained 

at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities 

in North Carolina or to house such individuals at such 

facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER 

4 INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT NAVAL STATION, 

5 GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FACILITIES IN 

6 NORTH CAROLINA. 

7 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made 

8 available to any Federal department or agency may be 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 829 IH

1 used to transfer any individual detained by the United 

2 States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to any 

3 military installation located in the State of North Carolina 

4 or any Federal detention center located in the State of 

5 North Carolina or to house any such individual at such 

6 an installation or detention center. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          21,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                       979
<INVENTORY>                                     16,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,337
<PP&E>                                         103,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,598
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,032
<SALES>                                        121,176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,176
<CGS>                                           80,187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   463
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,967
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,908
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.23
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

N RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

CLEMENT URENA (and wife, BELKIS URENA), 07-CV-1540 (AKH)

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY

CENTURY 21, INC. OF

-against- ANSWER TO MASTER

COMPLAINT

100 CHURCH LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant CENTURY 21, INC. (hereinafter Century

21), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off

Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, herein adopt

Century 21s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter

of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, Century 21 demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action

as against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: New York, New York

September 10, 2007

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

CENTURY 21, NC.

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 687-0100

Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintaff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

All Other Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the following

document to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of Century 21s Adoption of Answer to Master Complaint.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintjffs

Dated: September 11,2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Deftndants

Is

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
# No. 06-14-00108-CV COURT OF APPEALS SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS Texarkana, Texas

_______________________________________________________________________

MICHAEL WEAKS AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS

APPELLANTS VS. FIRST HORIZON HOME LOANS A DIVISION OF FIRST TENNESSEE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION APPELLEE

________________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the County Court at Law Number One (1)

Hunt County, Texas Honorable Timothy S. Linden Case Number: CC1400136

_______________________________________________________________________

APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

________________________________________________________________________ LARRY W. GREEN, JR. State Bar Card # 00792545 2507 Washington Street P.O. Box 765 Greenville, Texas 75403-0765 903/455-1876 903/455-1710 (Telecopier) lgreenjr@pgnwlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS ACCEPTED 06-14-00108-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 2/24/2015 2:37:43 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

# APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO EX TEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

Appellants, MICHAEL DAVID W EAKS and ALL OCCUPANTS OF 2230 Cam Drive AKA 4376 CR 3131 Lone Oak, Texas 75453, m ove to extend the tim e f or f iling their Brief

, and show the Court the f o llowing: 1) The Deadline f

or the f iling of the brief is February

26, 2015. 2) The length of

the extension sought is 30 day s, that is, until March 27, 2015. 3) The Appellants need an extension of tim e to f i le their Brief

because the Parties have entered settlem ent negotiations concerning all litigation between the Parties. If a settlem ent is reached, the issue of possession of

the Appellants’ hom estead, which is the subject of the this Appeal, will be resolved and the Appeal can be dism issed. Additionally , the Appellants need additional tim e to f ully brief the issues raised in their Appeal. 4) No previous extensions have been requested. THEREFORE, Appellants pray that the extension requested be granted. Respectf ully Subm itted, PEMBERTON, GREEN, NEW COMB & W EIS

/S/ Larry W

. Green, Jr. LARRY W . GREEN, JR. State Bar Card # 00792545 2507 W ashington Street P.O. Box 765 Greenville, Texas 75403-0765 903/455-1876 903/455-1710 (Telecopier) lgreenjr@ pgnwlaw.com Attorney For Appellants

S: \ L GJ r_A s s i s tan

t\ WP Docu m en ts \ T RE M \

Work\ L Gjr\ 10 Gen eral L i ti g ati on \ Weaks , M i ch ael an d Chri s ti \ Moti on t o E x ten d T i m e to F i l e B ri ef

. wpd

# CERTIFICATE OF SERV ICE I certif y that a true and correct copy of the f oregoing has been served on the f ollowing counsel and/or pro se parties of r ecord, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5, on the date shown. Dated: February

20, 2015

/S/ Larry W

. Green, Jr. Larry W . Green, Jr.

S: \ L GJ r_A s s i s tan

t\ WP Docu m en ts \ T RE M \

Work\ L Gjr\ 10 Gen eral L i ti g ati on \ Weaks , M i ch ael an d Chri s ti \ Moti on t o E x ten d T i m e to F i l e B ri ef

. wpd
Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          15,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                       742
<INVENTORY>                                     17,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,725
<PP&E>                                          97,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,016
<SALES>                                        152,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,368
<CGS>                                          104,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   747
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,519
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.41
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

The
Board of Directors

Unilever PLC:

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-219500-01) on Form F-3 and (No. 333-185299) on Form S-8 of Unilever PLC of our report dated 23 February 2018, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Unilever
Group (Unilever N.V. and Unilever PLC, together with their subsidiaries) as of 31 December 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in
equity, and consolidated cash flow statements for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2017, and the related notes and the Guarantor Statements (collectively, the Consolidated Financial Statements), and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017, which report appears in the 31 December 2017 annual report on Form 20-F of Unilever PLC.

Our report dated 23 February 2018 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Unilever Group acquired Carver Korea Co, Ltd, Mar Terra, TAZO,
Sundial, and Schmidts Naturals during November and December 2017 and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of Unilever Groups internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017, Carver Korea Co, Ltd,
MaeTerra, TAZO, Sundial, and Schmidts Naturals internal control over financial reporting associated with approximately 7.8% of Unilever Groups total assets as at 31 December 2017 and approximately 0.17% of Unilever Groups
turnover included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Unilever Group as of and for the year ended 31 December 2017. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Unilever Group also excluded an evaluation of the internal
control over financial reporting of Carver Korea Co, Ltd, Mae Terra, TAZO, Sundial, and Schmidts Naturals.



|                       |  |  |  |                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|KPMG LLP               |  |  |  | KPMG Accountants N.V.    
|London, United Kingdom |  |  |  | Amsterdam, Netherlands   
|                       |  | 
|/s/ KPMG LLP           |  |  |  | /s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.

28 February 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7210

CRAIG O. COPLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

P. W. KECHANE, Warden, United States Medical

Center for Federal Prisoners,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-96-523-HC-BR)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig O. Copley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Copley v. Kechane, No. CA-96-523-HC-BR (E.D.N.C. July 23,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
- Home

# Arrest Summary Report

**United States Capitol Police Arrest Summary Report*To request a public document, contact the USCP Reports Processing Section at (202) 228-4585.***

USCP Report Request Form 2019.pdf

- First page« First
- Previous page‹ Previous
- …
-               Page            5
-               Page            6
-               Page            7
-               Page            8
-               Current page            9
-               Page            10
-               Page            11
-               Page            12
-               Page            13
- …
- Next pageNext ›
- Last pageLast »

## Media Center

              - Press Releases
              - USCP Arrests
              - USCP FAST FACTS

## Glossary

                - R/O = Reporting/Responding Officer
                - SFST = Standardized Field Sobriety Test
                - W = Witness
                - S = Suspect
                - SA = Special Agent
                - CIS = Criminal Investigations Section
                - CSS = Crime Scene Search
                - C = Complainant
                - LPR = License Plate Number
                - CFN = Capitol File Number
                - Unless otherwise noted, Defendants placed under arrest are transported to USCP Headquarters, 119 D Street, NE, for processing.
Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01656-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 22 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1606 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1606

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil-, gas-, 
 and methane hydrate-related seismic activities in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas of 
          the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2019

  Mr. Beyer (for himself and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil-, gas-, 
 and methane hydrate-related seismic activities in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas of 
          the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Atlantic Seismic Airgun Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL-, GAS-, AND METHANE HYDRATE-RELATED SEISMIC 
              ACTIVITIES IN NORTH ATLANTIC, MID-ATLANTIC, SOUTH 
              ATLANTIC, AND STRAITS OF FLORIDA PLANNING AREAS OF OUTER 
              CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 11 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1340) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Moratorium on Oil-, Gas-, and Methane Hydrate-Related Seismic 
Activities in North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits 
of Florida Planning Areas.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
no person or agency of the United States may conduct geological or 
geophysical activities (as those terms are described in the final 
programmatic environmental impact statement of the Bureau of Ocean 
Energy Management entitled `Atlantic OCS Proposed Geological and 
Geophysical Activities, Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic Planning Areas' 
and completed February 2014) in support of oil, gas, or methane hydrate 
exploration or development in any area located in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, or Straits of Florida planning areas of 
the outer Continental Shelf.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Leslie A. Hardy, Also Known as Leslie A. Magistro, Appellant, v Annette Sicuranza, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And Another Action.)

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), entered July 27, 1985, which is in favor of the respondent and against her, upon a jury verdict.

Ordered that judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial of the plaintiff’s action as against the respondent is granted, with costs to abide the event.

A statute or principle of law should be charged only where there is evidence in the record to support a finding that the statute or rule was violated *(see, Green v Downs,*27 NY2d 205, 208-209; *Gamar v Gamar,*114 AD2d 487; *Wilmot v City of New York, 73*AD2d 201). The trial court’s instructions to the jury should state the law as applicable to the particular facts in the case. Applying these standards, we find the trial court erred in charging the rules applicable to the standard of care in an emergency situation (PJI 2:14). The "emergency charge” *139should not be given where, as here, the respondent should reasonably have anticipated and been prepared to deal with the situation with which she was confronted, as she had observed it from approximately 600 feet away *(see, Shaw v Manufacturer’s Hanover Trust Co.,*95 AD2d 738; *McAllister v Adam Packing Corp.,*66 AD2d 975).

It was also error for the trial court to decline the plaintiffs request to charge Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1216. The record indicates that the respondent, while operating her vehicle at the crest of a hill, on wet pavement, observed flashing red warning lights on a stationary truck approximately 600 feet away. She applied the brakes and shifted her vehicle into neutral. The car started to skid and fishtail down the hill until it hit the truck. Since this evidence tends to prove that Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1216 was violated, the requested instruction should have been charged to the jury.

Further, we also note that the trial court’s comment expressing its belief in the veracity of the respondent was improper.

Accordingly, a new trial is warranted. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Hooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.