alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William Keiper, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hypercom Corporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport. 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2007 By:  /s/ William Keiper    William Keiper    Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 869 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 869

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2009

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, as the ``Scott Reed Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 101 
Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Scott Reed Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Scott Reed Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH Document 20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH Document 20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH Document 20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### WINTER et al. v. MIDLAND NAT. BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

December 4, 1922.)

No. 6230.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of North Dakota.

Grimson & Snowfield and T. D. Pierce, all of Langdon, N. D., for plaintiffs in error. George Hoke, of Minneapolis, Minn., and O. J. Murphy, of Grand Forks, N. D., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error docketed and dismissed, with costs, pursuant to rule 16 (188 Fed. xi, 109 C. C. A. xi), on motion of defendant in error. See, also, 289 Fed. 1022.
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 41 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 10 of 10
Clear All

        17 June 2022    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet, U.S. Coast Guard and Royal Canadian Navy hold Frontier Sentinel Table Top Exercise                 
                NORFOLK, Va. (June 16, 2022) U.S. 2nd Fleet (C2F), U.S. Coast Guard Atlantic Area, and the Canadian Armed Forces’ Joint Task Force Atlantic participated in the 2022 Frontier Sentinel tabletop exercise (TTX) at Navy Warfare Development Command on Naval Station Norfolk, June 13-15.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John W. Smolak, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hypercom Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: August 9, 2004 By: /s/ John W. Smolak John W. Smolak Chief Financial Officer 
18
Exhibit 10.4




Amendment 

of the 

Exclusive Technology License Agreement




 

 

 


The effective date of the exclusive Technology License
Agreement (the "Agreement") signed by ProteomTech, Inc. ("PTI") and Guizhou
Yibai Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd ("Yibai") on March 7, 2005, is hereby changed
from "the date of last signing" to "the date when license fee (defined in 6.1 of
the Agreement) is paid by Yibai, or when PTI delivers the Technology (defined in
1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7 of the Agreement) to Yibai, whichever is later".





ProteomTech, Inc.




By: /s/ Jun Bao 

---------------------------------- 

President




Guizhou Yibai Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd




By: /s/ Xiangwu Ye

---------------------------------- 

General Manager



 

Date: April 16, 2005
Clear All

        07 December 2023    

                    New Chaplain Pin Making Waves Across The Surface Force                 
                Chaplains have been working side by side with Sailors since 1775, keeping to their core principle "to promote the spiritual, religious, moral, and personal well-being of the members of the Department of the Navy."             

        30 November 2023    

                    Commander, Naval Surface Forces, Honors Women Serving at Sea                 
                SAN DIEGO — Rear Adm. Yvette Davids, commander, Naval Surface Forces, hosted an all-hands call onboard Whidbey Island-class dock landing ship USS Comstock (LSD 45), to celebrate the 30-year anniversary of women serving aboard surface combatants at Naval Base San Diego, Nov. 30.            

        24 January 2023    

                    Five Species on San Clemente Island Declared Fully Recovered                 
                NAVAL BASE CORONADO, Calif. - Decades of collaborative conservation efforts on U.S. Navy-owned San Clemente Island resulted in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's announcement today that five species - San Clemente Island paintbrush, lotus, larkspur and bush-mallow plants and San Clemente Bell's            

        27 June 2022    

                    The future USS John L. Canley is christened                  
                SAN DIEGO - The future expeditionary sea base USS John L. Canley (ESB-6), Military Sealift Command’s newest ship, was christened during a ceremony at the General Dynamics NASSCO shipyard in San Diego, Calif., June 26.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001045548
<NAME> TE PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          42,861
<SECURITIES>                                     3,909
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,540
<PP&E>                                         797,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                 204,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 723,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,217
<BONDS>                                        398,737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   723,878
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,895
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,895
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 18      Filed 06/27/2007     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 18      Filed 06/27/2007     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 18      Filed 06/27/2007     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 18      Filed 06/27/2007     Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-04520-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### IRVING, Respondent, v. BRITTON, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

August 1, 1894.)

Action by Robert G. Irving against Joseph A. Britton. Howe & Hummel, for appellant L. B. Crane, for respondent.

No -opinion. Motion for Jeave to appeal to the *court*■of appeals. Granted. ' See 28 N. Y. Supp. 529.
Filed 7/2/13 P. v. Morrison CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and pa rties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for pu blication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. ZIMBALIST EUGENE MORRISON, Defendant and Appellant. D062862

(Super. Ct. No. SCD241913)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Dwayne K. Moring, Judge. Affirmed.

Sheila Quinlan, under ap pointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Da ne R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, A ssistant Attorney General, Willia m M. Wood, Meagan Beale and Marilyn L. George, Deputy Attorneys Ge neral, for Plaintiff and Respondent. In July 2012, Zimb alist Eugene Morrison stole two bottles of vodka from a grocery store. He pled guilty to petty theft with prio r theft convictions (Pen. Code, §§ 484, 666) and admitted having suffered a strike conviction (Pen. Code, § 667 subds. (b)-(i)) and having2 served a prior prison term (Pen . Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). In August, the court dismissed the prison prior and sentenced Morris on to 32 months in prison (twice the lower term). The court imposed a $154 criminal jus tice administration fee (booking fee) pursuant to Government

Code, section 29550.1. 1 Morrison appeals, contending th at imposition of the section 29550.1 booking fee violates the equal protection clause because that section does not require a finding of ability to pay, unlike the book ing fees set forth in sections 29550 and 29550.2, and there is no rational basis for distinguishing section 29550.1 from the latter two sections. Morrison did not object in the trial court to the imposition of the booking fee. He has thus forfeited his right to challenge the fee on appeal. ( People v. McCullough (2013) 56 Cal.4th 589, 593.) Morrison requests that we exercise our disc retion to consider the merits of the equal protection issue. ( People v. McCullough, supra, 56 Cal.4th at p. 593.) We decline to do so.

DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.

AARON, J.

WE CONCUR:

M C CONNELL, P. J.

IRION, J.

1 All further statutory references are to the Government Code.
EXHIBIT 4.1


 


NEITHER THIS SECURITY NOR THE SECURITIES
FOR WHICH THIS SECURITY IS EXERCISABLE HAVE BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR THE SECURITIES COMMISSION
OF ANY STATE IN RELIANCE UPON AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES
ACT”), AND, ACCORDINGLY, MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OR PURSUANT TO AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES
ACT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS. THIS SECURITY AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE OF THIS SECURITY
MAY BE PLEDGED IN CONNECTION WITH A BONA FIDE MARGIN ACCOUNT OR OTHER LOAN SECURED BY SUCH SECURITIES.


 


AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT


 


BIOSTAGE,
INC.


 


	Warrant Shares: _______________	 	 


 


This amendment to Common
Stock Purchase Warrant, dated as of December 16, 2019 (this “Amendment”), to that certain Common Stock Purchase Warrant
dated as of June 12, 2019 and executed by Biostage, Inc. (the “Company” and delivered to the warrant holder _______________
(the “Holder”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the
Holder is the record and beneficial owner of the Warrant as of the date hereof;


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 5(l) of the Warrant, this Warrant may be modified or amended or the provisions hereof waived with the written consent
of the Company and the Holder;


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Holder wish to amend the Warrant in accordance with the terms hereof.


 


AGREEMENT


 


		1.	Amendment to Section 1 of the Warrant with the definition of Termination Date being updated:



 


		a.	Amendment From: “Termination Date” means the earlier to occur of (i)
the date that is seven (7) weeks after the filing date of the Company’s first Investigational New Drug application with the
US Food and Drug Administration, and (ii) the five (5) year anniversary of the date of issuance of this Warrant.



 


		b.	Amendment To: “Termination Date” means April 30, 2020.



 


[REMAINDER
OF THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK]


 



     


     


    




  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company has caused this Warrant to be executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above indicated.


  


 


	Biostage, Inc.	 	 
	 	 	 
	
         

        By: ___________________________
	 	 
	Name: James McGorry	 	 
	
        Title:   Chief Executive Officer

         
	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Holder	 	 
	 	 	 
	
         

        By: ___________________________
	 	 
	Name: 	 	 
	Title:   	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 


[REMAINDER
OF THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK]
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE


PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Daniel
      L. Coury,Sr, the Chairman and acting Chief Executive Officer of YP Corp.,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on
      Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of YP Corp.





Date:
                February 20, 2007
            */s/
                Daniel L. Coury,Sr*Daniel
                L. Coury,SrChairman
                and acting Chief Executive Officer





I,
      Gary
      L. Perschbacher, the Chief Financial Officer of YP Corp., certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of YP Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter
      ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of YP Corp.





Date:
                February 20, 2007
            */s/
                Gary L Perschbacher*Gary
                L. PerschbacherChief
                Financial Officer