alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued February 4, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00024-CR

———————————

IN RE GERALD A. GOODSON, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Gerald A. Goodson has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging he 

is being illegally restrained by the Sheriff of Polk County, Texas.1 

We deny the petition. 

PER CURIAM

 

1 The underlying case is State v. Goodson, cause number 24,060, pending in the 411th 

District Court of Polk County, Texas, the Hon. Kaycee Jones presiding.
2

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11419]



[[Page 22594]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Amendment to a Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian 
Affairs (Management), Department of the Interior, through his delegated 
authority, has approved the Amendment between the Yankton Sioux Tribe 
and the State of South Dakota, which was executed on March 5, 2001.

DATES: This action is effective May 4, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: May 1, 2001.
James H. McDivitt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs (Management).
[FR Doc. 01-11419 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 28 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-04415-AKH Document 7 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04415-AKH Document 7 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04415-AKH Document 7 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04415-AKH Document 7 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04415-AKH Document 7 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-7 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-7 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-7 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# 03<W5 OHO-IS

COA # 14-13-00149-CR 

### STYLE: Larrlyon Deshun Williams vThe State ofTexas COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed DATE: November 25, 2014 Publish: Yes 

### OFFENSE: Attempted Capital Murder COUNTY: Fort Bend ,th 

### TRIAL COURT: 2401" District Court TC CASE #:10-DCR-054995A

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS


### STYLE: Larrlyon Deshun Williams vThe State ofTexas CCA# 

# APPEJ./-AA/f*<- Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:
DATE: JUDGE 

# f,Jy U*sU*~^' CCADisposition: DATE: 

### JUDGE:. SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1
  CONSENT
    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    (1)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8
    No. 333-86004)
    pertaining to the 1995 Stock and Incentive Plan as amended
    effective December 12, 2000,(2)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8
    No. 333-115365)
    pertaining to the 1995 Stock and Incentive Plan as amended
    effective December 12, 2000 and as further amended
    effective July 24, 2002,(3)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8
    No. 333-119609)
    pertaining to the Covanta Holding Corporation (formerly
    Danielson Holding Corporation) Equity Award Plan for Employees
    and Officers and the Covanta Holding Corporation Equity Award
    Plan for Directors of Covanta Holding Corporation,(4)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8
    No. 333-130046)
    pertaining to the registration of an additional
    2,000,000 shares of common stock as a result of an increase
    in the number of shares of common stock issuable under the
    Covanta Holding Corporation Equity Award Plan for Employees and
    Officers,(5)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8
    No. 333-150705)
    pertaining to the registration of an additional
    6,300,000 shares of common stock as a result of an increase
    in the number of shares of common stock issuable under the
    Covanta Holding Corporation Equity Award Plan for Employees and
    Officers and the Covanta Holding Corporation Equity Award Plan
    for Directors of Covanta Holding Corporation,(6)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-3
    No. 333-134173)
    pertaining to the registration of common stock, preferred stock,
    warrants, senior debt securities and subordinated debt
    securities, and(7)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-3
    No. 333-140082)
    pertaining to the registration of common stock, preferred stock,
    warrants, and debt securities  (Form 10-K)
  Ernst &
    Young LLP
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH SHAWN HALL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 154 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23694-23695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 11616-000-Michigan, Project No. 2566-010-Michigan


City of Portland, Michigan, Consumers Energy Company; Notice of 
Availability of Final Environmental Assessment

May 3, 2001.

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the City of Portland's application for 
original license for operating unlicensed Portland Municipal 
Hydroelectric Project, and Consumers Energy Company's new license for 
the continued operation of the Webber Hydroelectric Project, located on 
the Grand River, in the City of Portland, Ionia County, Michigan, and 
has

[[Page 23695]]

prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the projects. In 
the FEA, the Commission's staff has analyzed the potential 
environmental effects of the projects and has concluded that licensing 
the projects, with staff's recommended measures, would not constitute a 
major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2-A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. The DEA may also be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm. Please call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please 
contact Tom Dean at (202) 219-2778.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11654 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60414

Summary Calendar

BARAKATALI ALIJI MAREDIA

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A70 925 894

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Barakatali Aliji Maredia petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s decision to deny

his application for asylum and withholding of removal under both the

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Convention Against Torture

(CAT). The Government argues that Maredia’s petition for review should be

dismissed for want of proper briefing. We decline to dismiss the petition on that

basis.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 26, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-60414

2

Maredia argues that the BIA erred in determining that he had not

established past persecution based on his religious, social, and political

affiliations, a well-founded fear of future persecution, or that it was more likely

than not that he would be tortured if he were returned to India. He contends

that he established his eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal under

both the INA and the CAT by adducing evidence showing that he was detained

and beaten by police and that his restaurant was set on fire and destroyed.

We will uphold the BIA’s determination that Maredia is not eligible for

asylum or withholding of removal if that determination is supported by

substantial evidence. See Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78-79 (5th Cir. 1994). The

substantial evidence standard requires that the decision be based on the

evidence presented and that the decision be substantially reasonable.

Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996).

Our review of the record shows that the harm alleged by Maredia, which

occurred during times of civil unrest, is insufficientto establish persecution. See

Majd v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 590, 595 (5th Cir. 2006); Abdel-Masieh v. INS, 73

F.3d 579, 584 (5th Cir. 1996). The record does, however, show that Maredia’s

family has remained in India and has lived there peacefully. Further, the

pertinent Country Reports from the United States Department of State support

a conclusion that Muslims can live peacefully in India. In light of these factors,

the BIA’s decision concerning Maredia’s INA claims is supported by substantial

evidence, and the record does not compel a contrary conclusion. See Faddoul v.

I.N.S., 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994); Rojas v. INS, 937 F.2d 186, 190 n.1 (5th

Cir. 1991).

Maredia also has not shown that he is in danger of being tortured if he

returns to India. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002)

Consequently, his CAT claim is unavailing. See id. Maredia’s petition for review

is DENIED.
Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 10 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 10 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
(85 South. 482)

#### JACKSON v. JACKSON et al.

(4 Div. 855.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 12, 1920.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1920.)

Appeal and error <&wkey;l009(4) — Conclusion in equity not disturbed unless contrary to great weight of evidence.

In equity action where witnesses were examined ore tenus, the court’s conclusion has the same force as a verdict of the jury and will not be disturbed unless contrary to the great weight of evidence.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Covington County; A. B. Foster, Judge.

Bill by M. L. Jackson against J. P. Jackson and others to declare a deed a mortgage and to redeem. From a decree denying the relief prayed, complainant appeals.

Affirmed.

A. R. Powell and J. M. Prestwood, both of Andalusia, for appellant.

Ruder the facts in this case, equity will treat the deed as a mortgage. 72 Ala. 361. While property is usually worth what it brings, there was manifest a great disparity between the value of the laud and what Spear loaned upon it. Ill Ala. 621, 20 South. 614; 157 Ala. 206, 47 South. 289; 200 Ala. 27, 75 South. 839. The admission of Spear of an agreement to repurchase, bringing the case within the broader rule as to the measure of proof required. Ill Ala. 621, 20 South. 614. Under the facts in this case, the courts lean to redemption and treating the transaction as a mortgage. 137 Ala. 329, 34 South. 239; 143 Ala. 665, 42 South. 94; 80 Ala. 61; 81 Ala. 574, 1 South. 898.

Powell, Albritton & Albritton, of Andalusia, for appellees.

Complainant failed to make out his case. 80 Ala. 61; 125 Ala. 140, 28 South. 71, 82 Am. St. Rep. 225; 137 Ala. 329, 34 South. 239.

ANDERSON, C. J.

The complainant’s bill seeks to have a deed by him to one of these respondents, T. J. Spear, absolute upon its face, declared a mortgage and to redeem, and he testified in support of this contention. The respondent Spear claims, and so testified in effect, that the deed was never intended as a mortgage, but was a straight out sale of the land, though he did agree to resell the same to the complainant, if he saw fit to repurchase by the 25th of the following December, and which he did not do. According to the respondent’s theory of the transaction, the deed in question was never intended by both parties as a mortgage, and there was evidence in support of this theory, notwithstanding the complainant’s proof was to the effect that the deed was intended as a mortgage. The witnesses were examined ore tenus and were heard and seen by the trial court, and, as its conclusion was like unto the verdict of a jury, we are not prepared to say that the same was contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Fitzpatrick v. Stringer, 200 Ala. 574, 76 South. 932. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McCLELLAN, SOMERVILLE, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>   USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         229,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,300)
<INVENTORY>                                    135,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               799,100
<PP&E>                                       1,528,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               (917,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,503,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          687,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              800
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,503,800
<SALES>                                        364,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               375,100
<CGS>                                          212,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  332,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                               AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We have issued our report dated February 18, 2003, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Applica Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the aforementioned report
in the Registration Statements of Applica Incorporated on Form S-3 (File No.
33-26955, effective February 8, 1989), Form S-8 (File No. 33-58574, effective
February 22, 1993), Form S-3 (File No. 333-06759, effective June 25, 1996),
Form S-8 (File No. 333-52389, effective May 12, 1998), Form S-8 (File No.
333-52383, effective May 12, 1998), Form S-8 (File No. 333-86507, effective
August 3, 1999), Form S-8 (File No. 333-39986, effective June 23, 2000) and
Form S-8 (File No. 333-39990, effective June 23, 2000).



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Miami, Florida
February 18, 2003
Case 1:07-cv-05738-PKC-AJP Document 15 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05738-PKC-AJP Document 15 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Hypercom Corporation
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I certify that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2004 of Hypercom Corporation (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Hypercom Corporation. By:
    /s/ John W. SmolakJohn W. SmolakChief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004 20
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 15
August 13, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 8, 2002 on our review of interim
financial information of W. R. Grace & Co. (the "Company") as of and for the
period ended June 30, 2002, and included in the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-37024, 333-49083, 333-49507,
333-49509, 333-49511, 333-49513, 333-49515, 333-49517, 333-49703, and
333-49705).

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES

                                          States in Which
              Date         State of       Qualified as
Name          Incorporated Incorporation  Foreign Corporation

Agratech Seeds 
  Inc.          6/25/82    Georgia        Alabama
                                          Arkansas
                                          Florida
                                          Illinois
                                          Indiana
                                          Kentucky
                                          Missouri
                                          North Carolina
                                          South Carolina
                                          Virginia

Agratrade Financing,
   Inc.         1/23/85    Georgia        Alabama
                                          Florida
                                          South Carolina
                                          North Carolina

Agvestments, 
  Inc.          10/25/76   Georgia        Alabama
                                          Florida
                                          South Carolina

Carolina Golden Products
Company, Inc.   1/28/91    Georgia        South Carolina

Dixico Pet Food,
 Inc.           1/16/91    Georgia

Gk Finance
 Corporation    3/5/90     Delaware

Gk Stores, Inc. 1/22/88    Georgia        Florida
                                          South Carolina

GKX, Inc.       6/3/86     Territory
                           of Guam

Luker Inc.      12/12/68   Georgia        Alabama
                                          South Carolina
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,599,930
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,582,079)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Etelos, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: December 31,  2008 | /s/ Daniel  J.A. Kolke                      |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                          | Daniel J.A. Kolke, Chief  Executive Officer |
|                          | (Principal Financial  Officer)              |

 

----