alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 34 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 34 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        12 May 2023    

                    COMSUBLANT and 2nd Fleet Host Second Annual Junior Officer Undersea Warfare Symposium and Training                   
                Commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet and Commander, Submarine Forces hosted a Junior Officer Undersea Warfare Symposium and Training (JOUST) event aboard Naval Support Activity Hampton Roads, May 1-5.            

        08 March 2023    

                    USS Bataan completes three high-level DV tours in a week                  
                USS Bataan steps up to the plate in a very big way to host three high-profile DV visits in five days.            

        17 June 2022    

                    U.S. 2nd Fleet, U.S. Coast Guard and Royal Canadian Navy hold Frontier Sentinel Table Top Exercise                 
                NORFOLK, Va. (June 16, 2022) U.S. 2nd Fleet (C2F), U.S. Coast Guard Atlantic Area, and the Canadian Armed Forces’ Joint Task Force Atlantic participated in the 2022 Frontier Sentinel tabletop exercise (TTX) at Navy Warfare Development Command on Naval Station Norfolk, June 13-15.            

        25 April 2022    

                    USS Donald Cook Returns to Naval Station Mayport                 
                JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) returned to Naval Station Mayport following a three-month deployment, April 24.            

        13 April 2022    

                    USS Forrest Sherman Returns to Norfolk                 
                NAVAL STATION NORFOLK - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98) returned home to Naval Station Norfolk following a surge deployment, April 13.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         17,975
<SECURITIES>                                   1,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                   540
<INVENTORY>                                    17,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               64,529
<PP&E>                                         14,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 80,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,645
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       190
<OTHER-SE>                                     59,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   80,044
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,022
<CGS>                                          51,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  51,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               47,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (55)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,998
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .60
        


</TABLE>
Clear All

        12 June 2023    

                    U.S.-led NATO explosive ordnance disposal task unit demonstrates interoperability, readiness in exercise BALTOPS 23                 
                Explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) divers and technicians from Belgium, Denmark, France, Norway and the United States, assigned to NATO Task Unit 30, are participating in exercise Baltic Operations 2023 (BALTOPS 23) in Germany, Poland, and in the Baltic Sea, from June 5-16.            

        08 June 2023    

                    NATO MCM demonstrates readiness with real-world benefit in BALTOPS 23                 
                Ships and ashore units from 11 NATO Ally nations commenced the mine countermeasures (MCM) phase of exercise Baltic Operations 2023 (BALTOPS 23) in Germany, Poland and in the Baltic Sea, June 5.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 24.3



POWER OF ATTORNEY



I, S. Sanford Schlitt, a duly elected Director of Comdial Corporation, a Delaware corporation, do hereby constitute and appoint Ralph R. Dyer and Carla K. Luke, or either
of them, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities (including without limitation, as Director of Comdial), to sign Comdials Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, with all exhibits thereto, and any and all documents in connection therewith, hereby granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full
power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done, and hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney
shall not terminate upon my disability.



Dated: 03/26/04



| |  |                       
| |  | ----------------------
| |  | /s/ S. Sanford Schlitt
| |  | S. Sanford Schlitt
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6470 

For the relief of the peoples of Bikini, Enewetak, Rongelap, and Utrik, 

and of other affected citizens of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2010 

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA (for himself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. BORDALLO, and Mr. 

SABLAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of the peoples of Bikini, Enewetak, Rongelap, 

and Utrik, and of other affected citizens of the Republic 

of the Marshall Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS. 

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 

5 monies in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to the 

6 peoples of Bikini, Enewetak, Rongelap, and Utrik, and to 

7 other affected citizens of the Marshall Islands, respec8 tively, or to their respectively designated representatives, 

9 the sum of $lllllllllll, for the benefit of 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6470 IH

1 and distribution to the people of Bikini, the people of 

2 Enewetak, the people of Rongelap, the people of Utrik, 

3 respectively, and all other citizens of the Marshall Islands 

4 affected as a result of the United States atmospheric nu5 clear weapons testing program conducted in the Marshall 

6 Islands between June 30, 1946, and August 18, 1958. 

7 The payment of such sum shall be in full satisfaction of 

8 all claims against the United States of the peoples of Bi9 kini, Enewetak, Rongelap, and Utrik, and all claims of 

10 other citizens of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, 

11 based on, arising out of, or in any way related to such 

12 atmospheric nuclear weapons testing program. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*LEONARDO NOGUEIRA

*KirstinB. Coffin,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Mitchell S. Brody,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 21, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 84 Conn. App. 819 (AC 24686), is denied.
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 7 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 7 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, G. Grant Lyon, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hypercom Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2005 By:  /s/G. Grant Lyon    G. Grant Lyon    Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


December 13, 2019


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 456 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on December 12, 2019, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-233801) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
			/s/
                                         GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	 	Vice President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6444.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

*254Larry Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Antonio J. Reynolds, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04392]


Unilever-Bestfoods, Lipton, Conopco, Inc., Dallas, Texas; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA-Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(A), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on 
February 5, 2001, applicable to workers of Unilever-Bestfoods, Lipton, 
Dallas, Texas. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
March 2, 2001 (66 FR 13087).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of 50 pound bulk margarine cubes. New information 
shows that some workers separated from employment at Unilever-
Bestfoods, Lipton had their wages reported under a separate 
unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Conopco, Inc., a company 
established by the subject firm to handle worker compensation 
nationwide.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Unilever-Bestfoods, Lipton, who were adversely affected by a 
shift of production of margarine to Canada.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-04392 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Unilever-Bestfoods, Lipton, Conopco, Inc., 
Dallas, Texas, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after December 5, 1999, through February 5, 2003, 
are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade 
Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-11102 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)



I, Steven M. Belote, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of Shore
Financial Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  (c) presented in this quarterly  report our conclusions  about
the  effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  (b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,   that  involves
management or other  employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's
internal controls; and

         6. The registrant's  other certifying  officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 13, 2002

                                                     /s/ Steven M. Belote
                                                     CFO and Vice President
# CE2011236EN.01017701.xml

| 12.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 236/177 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 236/177

---

Wednesday 16 June 2010European Earth monitoring programme (GMES) (2011–2013) ***I

P7_TA(2010)0214

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 June 2010 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Earth observation programme (GMES) and its initial operations (2011–2013) (COM(2009)0223 – C7-0037/2009 – 2009/0070(COD))

2011/C 236 E/40

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2009)0223),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 157(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0037/2009),

having regard to the Communication from the Commission to Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures’ (COM(2009)0665),

having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 189 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 20 January 2010 (1),

1

after consulting the Committee of the Regions,

having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 5 May 2010 to approve Parliament's position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0161/2010),

| 1. | Adopts the position at first reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts the position at first reading hereinafter set out;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

1

---

Wednesday 16 June 2010P7_TC1-COD(2009)0070

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 16 June 2010 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No .../2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Earth monitoring programme (GMES) and its initial operations (2011 to 2013)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) No 911/2010)

---