alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BALA CYNWYD CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-05-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-05-1998
<CASH>                                         912,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               912,465
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 912,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          208,186
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       229,578
<OTHER-SE>                                     474,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   912,465
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,302
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,415
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00



</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 32      Filed 06/24/2008     Page 1 of 1
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 2

- 00 143

- CV

IN RE Yvonne LEIJA

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 14, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 6, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for

temporary relief. The court has cons idered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus and motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011

- EM5

- 02019 , styled In the Interest of T.G.R., A Child

, pending in the

45 th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe presiding. However,

the order complained of was signed by the Honorable Janet Littlejohn, presiding judge of the 150th Judicial District

Court, Bexar County, Texas.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. (formerly Rorer Group Inc.) on Form S-3 (Registration
No. 33-58229, Registration No. 33-62052, Registration No. 33-36558, Registration
No. 33-30795, Registration No. 33-23754, Registration No. 15671, Registration
No. 33-53378 and Registration No. 33-55694) and on the Form S-8 (Registration
No. 33-58998, Registration No. 33-24537 and Registration No. 33-21902) of our
report dated January 26, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995
and 1994, and for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
-----------------------------------
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 18, 1996
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-1729

___________________________

Matthew A. Suschanke

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Thomas Neske, individually; Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St.

Louis; Bettye Battle-Turner, In her official capacity as President of the Board of

Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis; Richard H. Gray, In his official

capacity as Vice-President of the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St.

Louis; Jerry Lee, In his official capacity as Purchasing Member of the Board of

Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis; Francis G. Slay, In his official

capacity as Ex-Officio Member of the Board of Police Commissioners of the City

of St. Louis; Michael Gerdine, In his official capacity as Treasurer of the Board of

Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: February 21, 2013

Filed: February 26, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________
PER CURIAM.

Matthew Suschanke appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint 1

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. Having carefully reviewed the record,

we agree with the district court that Suschanke failed to state a section 1983 claim

against Thomas Neske for false arrest, see Garionis v. Newton, 827 F.2d 306, 310

(8th Cir. 1987) (person who is already under arrest and in police custody cannot be

“rearrested”), or for either excessive force or violation of intimate-association rights,

see King v. Olmsted Cnty., 117 F.3d 1065, 1067-68 (8th Cir. 1997) (mere verbal

threats generally do not support § 1983 claim). Thus, Suschanke failed to state

similar claims against the City of St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners (Board). 

See Moore v. City of Desloge, Mo., 647 F.3d 841, 849 (8th Cir. 2011) (municipal

liability for failure to train orsupervise cannot attach unlessindividual liability isfirst

found on underlying substantive claim); Moyle v. Anderson, 571 F.3d 814, 817

(8th Cir. 2009) (municipal liability under § 1983 requires showing of constitutional

violation pursuant to official custom, policy, or practice of governmental entity);

Brown v. Fortner, 518 F.3d 552, 559 n.1 (8th Cir. 2008) (§ 1983 claims cannot be

based on respondeat superior or vicarious liability). Having properly dismissed the

federal claims, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over Suschanke’s state-law false-imprisonment claims

against Neske and the Board. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). 

Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, clarifying that the dismissal of the

state-law claims is without prejudice, see Labickas v. Ark. State Univ., 78 F.3d 333,

334-35 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

______________________________

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

-2-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6883
RICKY A. PIERCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus M. POLK; SERGEANT RHODES; OFFICER PARKER; OFFICER BURNETTE, Defendants - Appellees, and
ROBERT LEWIS; EARL D. BESHEARS; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; V. L. BOUNDS; SERGEANT OVERTON; SERGEANT WOODS; SERGEANT WINSTEAD; OFFICER MASSEY, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-845-5-F) Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 9, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. LaVee Hamer, Robert M. Curran, Claude Norman Young, Jr., Hal F. Askins, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; M. Lynn Jarvis, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the jury's verdict in favor of Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant claimed that Defendants used excessive force in removing a pillow from his cell, violently throwing him against a bed rail and injuring his back. Defendants, by contrast, testified that they took the pillow from Appellant's hands by turning his thumbs toward his wrists, handcuffing him, and taking the pillow, after Appellant refused to voluntarily relinquish the pillow. They claimed that Appellant offered no physical resistance, remained seated, and exhibited no signs of injury after the incident. The jury obviously creditedDefendants' version of events and we will not disturb such credibility determinations on appeal. See United States v. Saunders , 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). Therefore, we affirm the judgment entered on the jury's verdict. See Pierce v. Polk , No. CA-92-845-5- F (E.D.N.C. May 25, 1995). To the extent that Appellant notes an appeal from the districtcourt's prior orders dismissing certain other claims and Defendants, we have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pierce v. Polk, No. CA-92-845-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 1994; Apr. 28, 1993; July 7, 1993). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-4 ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 14-2 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11327]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

April 30, 2001.

TIME AND DATE: 11:15 a.m., Monday, April 30, 2001.

PLACE: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider whether to 
postpone the May 2, 2001, Commission meeting regarding Eagle Energy, 
Inc., Docket No. WEVA 98-123.
    No earlier announcement of the meeting was possible.

Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 66, No. 83, at 
21,416, April 30, 2001.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Wednesday, May 2, 2001.

PLACE: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed in Part [Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10)].

CHANGES IN MEETING:  The Commission has postponed the Commission 
meeting to consider and act upon Eagle Energy, Inc., Docket No. WEVA 
98-123, until 10 a.m., Wednesday, May 30, 2001.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen, (202) 653-5629/(202) 708-9300 
for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 01-11327 Filed 5-1-01; 3:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
, Appellant,

v.

GLORIA GOINS
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 4722

[ June 1, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; William L. Roby , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562010CA003786

.

Kimberly N. Hopkins, Ronald M. Gaché and Ileen J. Cantor of Shapiro, Fishman & Gaché, LLP, Tampa, for appellant.

Justin S. Orosz of The Ticktin Law Group, P.A., Deerfield Beach, for appellee.

P ER C UR IAM

.

The appellant

, Green Tree Servicing, appeals a final judgment in favor of the homeowner, in which the court concluded that strict compliance with the notice of default provisions in paragraph twenty

- two of the
mortgage was necessary. Specifically, the court found that b ecause the notice provided by Green Tree failed to use the exact langua ge contained in that paragraph , Green Tree had failed to comply with a condition precedent. In Lopez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

, 187 So. 3d 343 , 345 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) , decided after the final judgment in this case, we held that “a notice of default need only substantially comply with a mortgage’s condition precedent.” Lopez considered a notice of default with the identical language as the notice se nt in this case and held that it substantially complied with paragraph twenty

- two , thus satisfying the condition precedent to foreclosure under the mortgage

. Consistent with Lopez

, we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.

C IKLIN
, C.J., W ARNER and G ERBER
, JJ., concur

.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**J M**  **K** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0385 JAMIE MICHAEL JOHNSON,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a n extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted a n extension of time to and including March 8 , 2021 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 26 2021

01/26/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0385
Case 1:07-cr-00553-BSJ     Document 27      Filed 04/03/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 55 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
#                                                                         USS McFaul (DDG 74) arrives in Rotterdam, Netherlands                                                                    

##### by Carrier Strike Group 12 Public Affairs

14 November 2022
ROTTERDAM, Netherlands - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS McFaul (DDG 74) arrived in Rotterdam, Netherlands for a scheduled port visit, Nov. 12, 2022. 

While in Rotterdam, the crew will have the chance to continue fostering the strong and enduring relationship between the United States and the Netherlands through visits to cultural and historical landmarks around the city.  

“The Netherlands is one of our longest allies, so it is great to be back amongst friends. We are looking forward to enjoying the rich culture of Rotterdam during our visit,” said Cmdr. Antonia Shey, commanding officer of McFaul.  

Rotterdam marks the first port visit for McFaul since operating in the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) area of responsibility. The Netherlands is one of the United States’ oldest allies with a strong relationship dating back to the American Revolution.  

“The United States is committed to supporting regional stability and security with the Netherlands, one of our oldest allies, to ensure allied readiness and preparedness for any challenge,” said Capt. Jennifer Mills, Defense Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in the Hague.”  

Mcfaul is on a scheduled deployment in the U.S. Naval Forces Europe area of operations, employed by U.S. Sixth Fleet, to defend U.S., allied and partner interests. 

McFaul is assigned to the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group (GRFCSG). The GRFCSG is currently participating in exercise Silent Wolverine alongside six NATO allies, including the Netherlands. Silent Wolverine is a U.S.-led, combined training exercise that tests Ford-class aircraft carrier capabilities through integrated high-end naval warfare scenarios in the Eastern Atlantic Ocean. Last month, GRFCSG trained with the Netherlands and other allies and partners to demonstrate air defense, anti-subsurface warfare, distributed maritime operations, mine countermeasures, and amphibious operations in the Western Atlantic Ocean. 

GRFCSG consists of Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 12, Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 8, Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 2, USS Normandy (CG 60), USS McFaul (DDG 74), and USS Thomas Hudner (DDG 116). 

For over 80 years, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has forged strategic relationships with allies and partners, leveraging a foundation of shared values to preserve security and stability. 

Headquartered in Naples, Italy, NAVEUR-NAVAF operates U.S. naval forces in the U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) and U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) areas of responsibility. U.S. Sixth Fleet is permanently assigned to NAVEUR-NAVAF, and employs maritime forces through the full spectrum of joint and naval operations.

Tags:
**Netherlands**USS McFaul**Destroyer**port visit
Case 1:07-cv-05727-PKC Document 6 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
NO. 07-05-0112-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JANUARY 4, 2006

______________________________

FIRST STATE BANK,

Appellant

v.

BACC FARMS, LTD. and ROCKIN’ LAZY S CATTLE CO., INC., 

Appellees

_________________________________

FROM THE 69th DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUNTY;

NO. 04-32; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

First State Bank, appellant, and BACC Farms, Ltd. and Rockin’ Lazy S Cattle Co.,

Inc., appellees, have filed a joint motion to reverse judgment pursuant to a settlement

agreement. So too do they ask that we remand the cause to the trial court for entry of an

order dismissing the suit with prejudice. Per the request of the parties, we grant the

motion, reverse the judgment, and remand the cause to the trial court to effectuate the

settlement agreement. See Dunn v. Canadian Oil & Gas Services, Inc., 908 S.W.2d 323
2

(Tex. App.–El Paso 1995, no pet.) (authorizing such relief). Having reversed the judgment

and remanded the cause to the trial court at the request of the parties, no motion for

rehearing will be entertained and our mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT 

 

Schelberg-Pezzuti

V. 1:07-cv-3602

 

Schelberg et al.

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled action

is reassigned to the calendar of

JUDGE BRIEANT

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk’s Office of

the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge’s initials after the case

number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Date: 6/15/07

By: Tiffany Rodriguez

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 7:07-cv-03602-CS-GAY Document 5 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PRECISION STANDARD, INC.,

Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY,

Appellee

______________________ 

2017-1045

______________________ 

Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract 

Appeals in No. 58135, Administrative Judge Lynda T. 

O'Sullivan.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KEVIN MICHAEL COX, Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, argued for appellant.

MARK E. PORADA, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOYCE 

R. BRANDA, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., MARTIN F.

HOCKEY, JR.; EDWARD RALPH MURRAY, Office of Counsel, 

United States Defense Logistics Agency, Richmond, VA.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court