alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.41


 


AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE
EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of May 13, 2019, by and among Chongqing Jinghuangtai
Enterprise Management and Consulting Co., Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)
(“Pledgee”); Chongqing Penglin Food Co., Ltd., a limited liability company organized under the laws of the PRC
(“Penglin”) and Xinxin Shao, a shareholder holding 0.7% of the equity interests of Penglin (“Pledgor”,
with Pledgee and Penglin collectively referred to as the “Parties”).


 


 


WHEREAS, in connection
with a certain Technical Consultation and Service Agreement dated as of October 9, 2017, and, Amendment to Technical Consultation
and Service Agreement dated as of February 25, 2018 (collectively, the “Consulting Agreement”), Pledgee entered
into an Equity Pledge Agreement dated as of February 25, 2018 (the “Equity Pledge Agreement”) with Penglin and
Pledgee;


 


WHEREAS, Pledgor and
Zeshu Dai, as of the date hereof, have entered into a certain Share Transfer Agreement (the “Share Transfer Agreement”),
pursuant to which Pledgor has transferred all equity interest of Penglin to Zeshu Dai and no longer been the shareholder of Penglin;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration,
the Parties agree as follows:


 


A.       TERMINATION
OF THE EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT.


 


(1)       Pledgee
hereby terminates the Equity Pledge Agreement, and Pledgor and Pledgee hereby accept such termination.


 


(2)       Each
of the Pledgee, Pledgor and Penglin acknowledges that all service fees under Consulting Agreement have been settled, if any and
the Pledgor will not undertake any further obligations under the Consulting Agreement.


 


B.       GOVERNING
LAW. This Agreement shall be governed and construed under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, and shall be binding
on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.


 


C.       COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one instrument.


 


[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]


 






     


     


    

 


SIGNATURE PAGE


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their legal representatives and duly
authorized representatives on their behalf as of the date first set forth above.


 


Pledgee:


 


Chongqing Jinghuangtai Enterprise Management and Consulting
Co., Ltd.


 


	By:	/s/ Zeshu Dai	 
	Name:	Zeshu Dai	 
	Title:	Legal Representative	 
	 	 
	Chongqing Penglin Food Co., Ltd.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Zeshu Dai	 
	Name:	Zeshu Dai	 
	Title:	Legal Representative	 
	 	 
	Pledgor:	 
	 	 
	Xinxin Shao	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Xinxin Shao	 
	Xinxin Shao
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-382-000]

Take notice that on April 19, 2001, Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to be effective May 19, 2001:

55 Revised Sheet No. 50

56 Revised Sheet No. 51

23 Revised Sheet No. 52

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 56

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 263

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 263A

Second Revised Sheet No. 263B

Second Revised Sheet No. 263C

Third Revised Sheet No. 263D

Third Revised Sheet No. 263E

Northern states that it is filing revised tariff sheets to amend the provisions dealing with the Carlton Commodity Surcharge as further discussed in the filing.

Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10738 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05359-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05359-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05359-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05359-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05359-AKH Document 12 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
# C_2011054EN.01003601.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/36

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the detailed rules for access to the public regulated service offered by the global navigation satellite system established under the Galileo programme’

COM(2010) 550 final — 2010/0282 (COD)

(2011/C 54/11)

On 29 October 2010 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 172 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the detailed rules for access to the public regulated service offered by the global navigation satellite system established under the Galileo programme

Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the detailed rules for access to the public regulated service offered by the global navigation satellite system established under the Galileo programme

COM(2010) 550 – 2010/0282 (COD).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 467th plenary session of 8 and 9 December 2010 (meeting of 8 December), by 97 votes in favour and three abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 8 December 2010.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
EXHIBIT 23Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Rock-TennCompany of our reports dated November 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Rock-Tenn Company and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Rock-Tenn Company, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended September 30, 2007.(i) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-77237) pertaining to the Rock-Tenn Company 1993Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Rock-Tenn Company 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan, the Rock-TennCompany 1988 Stock Option Plan and the Rock-Tenn Company 1987 Stock Option Plan;(ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-83304) pertaining to the Rock-Tenn Company 1993Employee Stock Option Plan, the Rock-Tenn Company 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Rock-TennCompany Incentive Stock Option Plan, and the Rock-Tenn Company 1987 Stock Option Plan;(iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-62338) of Rock-Tenn Company pertaining to theregistration of $300,000,000 of debt securities;(iv) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-104870) pertaining to the Rock-Tenn CompanySupplemental Retirement Savings Plan;(v) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113212) pertaining to the Rock-Tenn Company 1993Employee Stock Purchase Plan;(vi) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62346) pertaining to the Rock-Tenn Company 1993Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2000 Incentive Stock Plan, and the Rock-Tenn Company 2004Incentive Stock Plan;(vii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122745) pertaining to the Rock-Tenn Company 2004Incentive Stock Plan;(viii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-133986) of Rock-Tenn Company pertaining to theregistration of $500,000,000 of debt securities, Preferred Stock and Class A Common Stock; and(ix) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-140597) of Rock-Tenn Company pertaining to the1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Rock-Tenn Company 2004 Incentive Stock Plan.                              Ernst & Young LLPAtlanta, Georgia
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7923

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARION PROMISE, a/k/a Mario,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00007-GCM-2)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marion Promise, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Dana Owen 

Washington, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marion Promise appeals the district court’s order 

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion to correct sentence. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Promise, No. 3:98-cr-00007-GCM-2 

(W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Clear All

        21 August 2023    

                    Military Sealift Command’s USNS Millinocket aids vessel in distress                 
                Military Sealift Command's (MSC) expeditionary fast transport USNS Millinocket (T EPF 3) rendered assistance to a distressed small leisure boat in the vicinity of Darwin, Australia, Aug. 8.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 7 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 5 of 5
Clear All

        26 July 2023    

                    Naval Air Force Atlantic nuclear-trained officer shares personal story, inspires students at ‘STEM Academy’                  
                Capt. Kathryn Wijnaldum, the officer in charge of the surface propulsion mobile training team assigned to Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic (CNAL), spoke to students attending Naval Information Warfare Center (NIWC) Atlantic’s summer science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)            

        12 January 2023    

                    Navy Scientists Test a Method for Healthier, Longer-Living Coral                 
                VIEQUES, Puerto Rico - The U.S. Navy and coral: neighbors; living, breathing structures; and members of interdependent ecosystems.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF APPLICA INCORPORATED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                           JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION

<S>      <C>                                                  <C>
The following companies are direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of
Applica Incorporated:

1.       WD Delaware, Inc.                                    Delaware
2.       Windmere Holdings Corporation                        Delaware
3.       HP Intellectual Corp.                                Delaware
4.       Applica Consumer Products, Inc.                      Florida
5.       Sandgate Services Limited                            Hong Kong
6.       HP Delaware, Inc.                                    Delaware
7.       PPC Industries Ltd.                                  British Virgin Islands
8.       Windmere SPC LLC                                     Cayman Islands
9.       HPG LLC                                              Delaware
10.      Household Products Chile Comercial Limitada          Chile
11.      Applica de Colombia Limitada                         Colombia
12.      Applica de Venezuela, C.A.                           Venezuela
13.      HP (BVI) Limited                                     British Virgin Islands
14.      HP Americas, Inc.                                    Delaware
15.      Household Products (Asia) Limited                    Hong Kong
16.      Applica Denmark ApS                                  Denmark
17.      Remdale Investments Limited                          British Virgin Islands
18.      Durable Electric Limited                             Hong Kong
19.      Applica Durable Manufacturing Limited                Hong Kong
20.      Applica Asia Limited                                 Hong Kong
21.      Maanring Holding B.V.                                Netherlands
22.      Tofino Investment Limited                            British Virgin Islands
23.      Applica Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V.            Mexico
24.      Applica de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.                Mexico
25.      Applica Canada Corporation                           Nova Scotia
26.      Windmere Durable (Asia) Limited                      Hong Kong
27.      Novotek Limited                                      Hong Kong
28.      Redcliffe Import and Export Limited                  Hong Kong
29.      Applica Durable Electric Limited                     Hong Kong
30.      Delanee Limited                                      Hong Kong

The following companies are directly or indirectly 50% owned by Applica
Incorporated:

31.      Anasazi Partners, L.P.                               Massachusetts
32.      Freshflush LLC                                       Florida
</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 6 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 6 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,768
<SECURITIES>                                       922
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,375
<INVENTORY>                                     79,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,360
<PP&E>                                          61,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,583)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,469
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,114
<SALES>                                         75,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,915
<CGS>                                           57,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,369
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,923
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,633)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)


</TABLE>
Clear All

        19 April 2021    

                    USS The Sullivans (DDG 68) Deploys in Support of British Carrier Task Group 21                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (DDG 68), departed Mayport, Apr. 19, for deployment to participate in HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) Strike Group.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
(85 South. 922)

#### Ex parte HARRIS.

(8 Div. 220.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 15, 1920.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Rayburn & Wright, of Guntersville, R. 'E. Smith, of Huntsville, and Callahan & Harris, of Decatur, for appellant.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of John C. Harris for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise judgment of said court rendered in the appeal of John C. Harris v. State of Alabama, 16 Ala. App. 509, 79 South. 270. Writ denied.
#### Hicks *vs.*Brantley.

A case having been tried and a motion for a new trial made, the following order, signed by counsel for both parties, was passed by the court:

“ A motion for new trial having been filed in the above stated case and approved by the court, and a brief of the evidence having been filed in said case, it is ordered that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be allowed thirty days to agree to said brief as the true evidence in said case; and should said counsel fail to agree to said evidence in the time allowed, the same shall be submitted to the court for approval before the first Wednesday in June next in the city of Macon. It is further ordered that movants have leave to amend their motion for new trial at the time for hearing' the same by giving opposite counsel notice thereof and copy of amendment thirty days before said hearing of the same. It is further ordered that said case bo set for a hearing on the first Wednesday in June next, in Macon, at the office of his honor, T.’ J. Simmons.” On the hearing, a motion to dismiss the motion for new trial was made, on the ground that no brief of evidence had been submitted and filed, as required by the order, within the time fixed by it, and no opportunity had been given counsel to agree to said brief in the time prescribed. An affidavit was presented, to the effect that the brief had not been presented to adverse counsel for their agreement. This motion was sustained, and the motion for new trial was dismissed:

*885
      *Held,*that under the peculiar language of the order, this was error. It appeared that the brief of evidence had been filed when the order was taken, claimed by the movant to be the correct brief, and equally accessible to counsel for the respondent for the purpose of agreement or disagreement; there was no time prescribed for further submission and filing, nor was further opportunity for agreement required to be given, except that, if counsel failed to agree to the brief, it should be submitted for approval before the . day set for the hearing, which was done. 48(?a., 124; 70Jd., 729.

(a.) If it were sought by such order to substitute the agreement of • counsel for the approval of the brief of evidence by the court, such . an order would have been illegal., The duty of inspecting and approving the brief rested upon the judge, and he could not, by any order, by consent of counsel or otherwise, deprive himself of jurisdiction to approve the brief of evidence and confer that jurisdictional power upon counsel. He could pass an order requiring the brief to be presented for approval within a certain time, and if not so presented, decline to approve it, and dismiss the motion; bu^ he could not pass an order substituting counsel’s agreement to the brief for his own approval; nor was this done by the order which was passed. It provided that, upon a failure to agree, the brief should be presented to the judge before the day set for the hearing; • or if counsel agreed, it was not necessary to present it before such day. It was, in fact, presented before the day set.

Judgment reversed.

October 27, 1885.

Jackson, Chief Justice.