alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION



In connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Storage  Properties
IV, Ltd. (the  "Partnership") for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald
L. Havner, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage,  corporate general
partner, and John Reyes, as Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, corporate
general  partner,  each  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Partnership.

/s/  Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
------------------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    March 26, 2008

/s/  John Reyes
------------------------------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    March 26, 2008
#                                                                         EODTEU Two Holds Change of Command Ceremony                                                                    

##### by  Chief Petty Officer Ariella Feracho

29 August 2022 VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (Aug. 25, 2022) -- 

                220825-N-GX935-9346 VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (Aug. 25, 2022).  Prospective commanding officer, Explosive Ordnance Disposal Training and Evaluation Unit (EODTEU) 2, Cmdr. Paul Mahoney; Cmdr. Douglas Alley, commander, EODTEU 2; and Capt. Chuck Eckhart, commodore, Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group (EODGRU) 2, render salutes as they await the color guard to post the colors and begin their change of command ceremony.  Under the direction of commander, EODGRU 2, EODTEU 2 oversees training for all East Coast based EOD and Mobile Diving and Salvage units, as well as EOD Mobile Unit (EODMU) 8, based in Rota, Spain. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief Personnel Specialist Ariella Feracho/Released)            

                220825-N-GX935-9346            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Chief Petty Officer Ariella Feracho

VIRIN: 220825-N-GX935-9346

Tags:
**NECF**NECC**USFFC**USFF**eod**EODEU**DIVER

Terms:
**Capabilities and Communities**Advancement & Promotion**Leadership**NECC
#### Cesar ANDRADE-BOLANOS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-72858.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 22, 2013.

Cesar Andrade-Bolanos, El Paso, TX, pro se.

Ilissa M. Gould, Trial, Leslie McKay, Esquire, Assistant Director, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar Andrade-Bolanos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have juris*547diction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo constitutional claims. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Andrade-Bolanos’ motion to reopen as untimely where it was filed nearly two years after his removal order became final, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and An-drade-Bolanos does not qualify for any of the regulatory exceptions to the filing deadline, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c), or equitable tolling of the filing deadline, *see Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir.2003).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s refusal to reopen proceedings sua sponte. *See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder,*633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir.2011).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Andrade-Bolanos’ underlying due process claims.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#                                                                         Winners of NIWC Atlantic’s AI Prize Challenge Recognized at Eastern Defense Summit                                                                    

##### by Steve Ghiringhelli, NIWC Atlantic Public Affairs Office

15 December 2023

                    Winners of NIWC Atlantic’s AI Prize Challenge Recognized at Eastern Defense Summit                                            1 of 3                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    Winners of NIWC Atlantic’s AI Prize Challenge Recognized at Eastern Defense Summit                                            2 of 3                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    Winners of NIWC Atlantic’s AI Prize Challenge Recognized at Eastern Defense Summit                                            3 of 3                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

**About NIWC Atlantic****About Palmetto Tech Bridge****About CDCA**

Tags:
**AI**autonomy**CDCA**NIWC Atlantic**Prize Challenge**Palmetto Tech Bridge**PTB
**Exhibit 32**Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Grubb & EllisCompany (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge, on the date hereof:(a) the Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005 filed on the date hereof withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.                                             /s/ Mark E. Rose   Mark E. Rose      Chief Executive Officer   September 28, 2005                                           /s/ Brian D. Parker   Brian D. Parker   Chief Financial Officer   September 28, 2005
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 13 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 13 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 13 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 13 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05347-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
#### In the Matter of Eugene Buono et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated August 28, 1986, which denied their application.

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the application is granted.

On April 12, 1985, the petitioner Eugene Buono, who was then a New York City police officer, was bitten by a police horse which he was attempting to restrain. By order to show cause dated June 12, 1986, the petitioners sought leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e as a precondition to suing the City of New York, which application was denied. We reverse.

*686The city was provided with actual notice of the accident by virtue of a "line of duty injury report” as well as other incident reports which were filed shortly after the occurrence. These reports should have afforded the city "actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim” *(see,*General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; *Matter of De Modna v City of New York,*126 AD2d 435; *Matter of Lucas v City of New York,*91 AD2d 637). While the various accident reports do not specify that the horse in question was known to have vicious propensities, the information contained in the reports was nonetheless sufficient to alert the city to its potential liability. Furthermore, the city has completely failed to demonstrate that any prejudice resulted from the petitioners’ failure to serve a notice of claim within the prescribed 90-day period.

In view of the foregoing, we find, as a matter of discretion, that the petitioners’ application should have been granted. Although the excuse tendered by Mr. Buono for his failure to serve a notice of claim within the prescribed time is tenuous, this factor alone does not warrant denial of the instant application *(see, Rodriguez v County of Nassau,*126 AD2d 536; *Matter of Cicio v City of New York,*98 AD2d 38, 39; *Matter of Somma v City of New York,*81 AD2d 889). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6469 

To amend section 17 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to include a condition of receipt of funds under the child and 

adult care food program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2010 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend section 17 of the Richard B. Russell National 

School Lunch Act to include a condition of receipt of 

funds under the child and adult care food program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONDITION OF RECEIPT OF FUNDS UNDER THE 

4 CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM. 

5 Section 17 of the Richard B. Russell National School 

6 Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766) is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6469 IH

1 ‘‘(u) INELIGIBILITY OF INSTITUTIONS.—An institu2 tion shall be ineligible for funds under this section if such 

3 institution employs a child care staff member who— 

4 ‘‘(1) refuses to consent to a criminal back5 ground check that includes— 

6 ‘‘(A) a search of the State criminal reg7 istry or repository in the State where the child 

8 care staff member resides and each State where 

9 such staff member previously resided; 

10 ‘‘(B) a search of State-based child abuse 

11 and neglect registries and databases in the 

12 State where the child care staff member resides 

13 and each State where such staff member pre14 viously resided; 

15 ‘‘(C) a search of the National Crime Infor16 mation Center; 

17 ‘‘(D) a Federal Bureau of Investigation 

18 fingerprint check using the Integrated Auto19 mated Fingerprint Identification System; and 

20 ‘‘(E) a search of the National Sex Of21 fender Registry established under the Adam 

22 Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 

23 (42 U.S.C. 16901 et seq.); 

24 ‘‘(2) makes a false statement in connection with 

25 such criminal background check; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6469 IH

1 ‘‘(3) is registered or is required to be registered 

2 on a State sex offender registry or the National Sex 

3 Offender Registry established under the Adam 

4 Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (42 

5 U.S.C. 16901 et seq.); or 

6 ‘‘(4) has been convicted of a felony consisting 

7 of— 

8 ‘‘(A) homicide; 

9 ‘‘(B) child abuse or neglect; 

10 ‘‘(C) a crime against children, including 

11 child pornography; 

12 ‘‘(D) spousal abuse; 

13 ‘‘(E) a crime involving rape or sexual as14 sault; 

15 ‘‘(F) kidnapping; 

16 ‘‘(G) arson; or 

17 ‘‘(H) physical assault, battery, or a drug18 related offense, committed within the past 5 

19 years.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.3.1
                                 HANS W. BIENER
                                SUPPLYCONSULT GbR
                                Karolinenplatz 5a
                             80333 Munchen, Germany

           Telephone: (+49) 178-7577784, Facsimile: (+49) 8091-561044
                          E-mail: hw.b@supplyconsult.de



                                                                October 19, 2005

Mr. Klaus Eckhof
Aurora Gold Corporation
30 Ledgar Road,
Balcatta, Western Australia
6021 Australia

Dear Mr. Eckhof,

Re:  Assignment  of  the  100  percent  interest  in  OURO  MIL  Memorandum  of
     Understanding  held  in  trust  for  Aurora  Gold  Corporation


This  letter will acknowledge that I, Hans W. Biener, on behalf of SupplyConsult
GbR, am holding in trust for the exclusive benefit of Aurora Gold Corporation, a
Delaware  corporation,  a  100  percent  interest  in the OURO MIL Memorandum of
Understanding  dated  October  18,  2005.

The Ouro Mil Memorandum of Understanding covers mineral rights registered in the
name  of Cidines da Silva Batista and is located in the region of Gleba Surubim,
known as Garimpo Ouro Mil, in the Municipality of Itaituba, state of Para, under
the  Process  DNPM  number  850415/2004.

I  irrevocably  transfer  the 100 percent interest in the OURO MIL Memorandum of
Understanding  to  Aurora  Gold  Corporation  without  further  consideration.


Yours  truly,

/s/ "Hans W Biener"
--------------------

SUPPLYCONSULT GbR
Hans W. Biener
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 49 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-35780) and Amendment No. 529 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The
      Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for
      the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

                /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 20, 2019
## **EXHIBIT23.3**

 

# **CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

We hereby consent to the use of our name and theinformation from our report regarding our estimates of reserves and future netrevenues from the production and sale of those reserves in the Annual Report on10-K of Pogo Producing Company for the year ended December 31, 2002, and to theincorporation by reference thereof into Pogo Producing Company’s previouslyfiled Registration Statement Nos. 33-54969, 333-04233, 333-72129, 333-75105,333-75105-01, 333-75105-02, 333-74861, 333-42426, 333-42428, 333-60800,333-67324, 333-59426, 333-65548, 333-86856, 333-98205 and 333-102775.

 

 
|              | /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|              |                    |   |
|              | RYDER SCOTT COMPANY     |   |
|              | PETROLEUM ENGINEERS     |   |
|              |                    |   |
|              |                    |   |
| Houston, Texas    |                    |   |   |
| February 27, 2003 |                    |   |   |
|                   |                         |        |  |  |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel NCCAM SEP C-11.                    

*Date:*                         May 23-25, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard by Marriott, 805 Russell Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John C. Chah, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Rm. 106, Bethesda, MD 20892-5495, 301-402-4334, chahj@mail.nih.gov.                    

Dated: April 30, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-11393 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH     Document 11      Filed 09/19/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH     Document 11      Filed 09/19/2007     Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-191-000]

Take notice that on December 15, 2000, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) filed a report reflecting the flow through of refunds received from Dominion Transmission, Inc.

On December 15, 2000, in accordance with Section 4 of its Rate Schedule LSS and Section 3 of its Rate Schedule GSS, Transco states that it refunded to its LSS and GSS customers $336,777.46 resulting from the refund of Dominion Transmission, Inc. Docket No. TM00-1-22-00. The refund covers the period from November 1999 to June 2000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before January 16, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the  Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​/online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​dorrbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1138  Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Woodham, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lagaña, J.), rendered March 29, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738) in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the motion is granted, James Ostrowski is relieved as attorney for the defendant and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Bernard Kleinman, P.O. Box 1781, New York, N. Y. 10185, is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the People are directed to furnish a copy of the stenographic minutes to the new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the defendant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order and the People shall serve and file their brief within 120 days of the date of this decision and order; by prior decision and order of this court, the defendant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers (including the typewritten stenographic minutes) and on the typewritten briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

Based upon this court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that arguable issues exist which could be raised on appeal. These issues include the trial court’s failure to charge the jury concerning the statutory requirement that accomplice testimony must be corroborated *(see,*CPL 60.22 [1]; 300.10 [2]; *People v Saraireh,*134 AD2d 464; *People v Strawder,*124 AD2d 758). Accordingly, the motion of the defendant’s assigned appellate counsel to be relieved as counsel is granted and new appellate counsel is assigned *(see, People v Gonzalez,*
      *60047 NY2d 606; *People v Casiano,*67 NY2d 906; *People v Miller,*99 AD2d 1021). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.