Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2001 / Notices 22535

viability analysis and risk assessments

in the FMEPs indicate the extinction

risk for listed steelhead under the

proposed fishery impact levels to be

low. A variety of monitoring and

evaluation tasks are specified in the

FMEPs to assess the abundance of

steelhead, determine fishery effort and

catch of steelhead and angler

compliance. A review of compliance

with the provisions of the FMEP will be

conducted by ODFW annually and a

comprehensive review to evaluate the

effectiveness of the FMEPs will occur at

a minimum every 5 years.

ODFW has provided NMFS a draft of

the Conservation Assessment of

Steelhead Populations in

Oregon(Assessment) as part of the FMEP

submittal. The Assessment provides the

population viability analysis and risk

assessment developed for ODFW’s

FMEPs. This Assessment is also

available for review and comment.

As specified in the July 10, 2000 ESA

4(d) rule for salmon and steelhead (65

FR 42422), NMFS may approve an

FMEP if it meets criteria set forth in §

223.203 (b)(4)(i)(A) through (I). Prior to

final approval of an FMEP, NMFS must

publish notification announcing its

availability for public review and

comment.

Authority

Under section 4 of the ESA, the

Secretary of Commerce is required to

adopt such regulations as he deems

necessary and advisable for the

conservation of species listed as

threatened. The ESA salmon and

steelhead 4(d) rule (65 FR 42422, July

10, 2000) specifies categories of

activities that contribute to the

conservation of listed salmonids and

sets out the criteria for such activities.

The rule further provides that the

prohibitions of paragraph (a) of the rule

do not apply to activities associated

with fishery harvest provided that an

FMEP has been approved by NMFS to

be in accordance with the salmon and

steelhead ESA 4(d) rule (65 FR 42422,

July 10, 2000).

Dated: April 30, 2001.

Margaret Lorenz,

Acting Chief, Endangered Species Division,

Office of Protected Resources, National

Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 01–11322 Filed 5–3–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S

COMMITTEE FOR THE

IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE

AGREEMENTS

Adjustment of Import Limits for Certain

Cotton, Man-Made Fiber, Silk Blend

and Other Vegetable Fiber Textiles and

Textile Products Produced or

Manufactured in Sri Lanka

April 30, 2001.

AGENCY: Committee for the

Implementation of Textile Agreements

(CITA).

ACTION: Issuing a directive to the

Commissioner of Customs adjusting

limits.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy

Unger, International Trade Specialist,

Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S.

Department of Commerce, (202) 482–

4212. For information on the quota

status of these limits, refer to the Quota

Status Reports posted on the bulletin

boards of each Customs port, call (202)

927–5850, or refer to the U.S. Customs

website at http://www.customs.gov. For

information on embargoes and quota reopenings, refer to the Office of Textiles

and Apparel website at http://

www.otexa.ita.doc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority: Section 204 of the Agricultural

Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854);

Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as

amended.

The current limit for Categories 347/

348/847 is being increased for

carryforward, and for swing and special

shift from Category 359–C/659–C and

647/648.

A description of the textile and

apparel categories in terms of HTS

numbers is available in the

CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel

Categories with the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States (see

Federal Register notice 65 FR 82328,

published on December 28, 2000). Also

see 65 FR 69503, published on

November 17, 2000.

D. Michael Hutchinson,

Acting Chairman, Committee for the

Implementation of Textile Agreements.

Committee for the Implementation of Textile

Agreements

April 30, 2001.

Commissioner of Customs,

Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC

20229.

Dear Commissioner: This directive

amends, but does not cancel, the directive

issued to you on November 13, 2000, by the

Chairman, Committee for the Implementation

of Textile Agreements. That directive

concerns imports of certain cotton, wool,

man-made fiber, silk blend and other

vegetable fiber textiles and textile products,

produced or manufactured in Sri Lanka and

exported during the twelve-month period

which began on January 1, 2001 and extends

through December 31, 2001.

Effective on May 4, 2001, you are directed

to adjust the limits for the following

categories, as provided for under the Uruguay

Round Agreement on Textiles and Clothing:

Category Adjusted twelve-month

limit 1

347/348/847 2,129,138 dozen.

359–C/659–C 2 1,282,727 kilograms.

647/648 1,209,265 dozen.

1The limits have not been adjusted to account for any imports exported after December

31, 2000. 2Category 359–C: only HTS numbers

6103.42.2025, 6103.49.8034, 6104.62.1020,

6104.69.8010, 6114.20.0048, 6114.20.0052,

6203.42.2010, 6203.42.2090, 6204.62.2010,

6211.32.0010, 6211.32.0025 and

6211.42.0010; Category 659–C: only HTS

numbers 6103.23.0055, 6103.43.2020,

6103.43.2025, 6103.49.2000, 6103.49.8038,

6104.63.1020, 6104.63.1030, 6104.69.1000,

6104.69.8014, 6114.30.3044, 6114.30.3054,

6203.43.2010, 6203.43.2090, 6203.49.1010,

6203.49.1090, 6204.63.1510, 6204.69.1010,

6210.10.9010, 6211.33.0010, 6211.33.0017

and 6211.43.0010.

The Committee for the Implementation of

Textile Agreements has determined that

these actions fall within the foreign affairs

exception of the rulemaking provisions of 5

U.S.C. 553(a)(1).

Sincerely,

D. Michael Hutchinson,

Acting Chairman, Committee for the

Implementation of Textile Agreements.

[FR Doc. 01–11212 Filed 5–3–01; 8:45 a.m.

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Final Programmatic Environmental

Impact Statement (FPEIS) on

Transportable Treatment Systems for

Non-Stockpile Chemical Warfare

Materiel

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: This FPEIS has been prepared

by the Army in compliance with the

National Environmental Policy Act of

1969, regulations of the President’s

Council on Environmental Quality (40

CFR 1500–1508), and Army Regulation

200–2. As the Executive Agent for the

DoD, the Army is responsible for

destroying that portion of the nation’s

chemical warfare materiel referred to as

‘‘non-stockpile’’ chemical warfare

materiel. This non-stockpile chemical

warfare materiel must be destroyed in

order to protect human health and