alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. GT01-17-000 and CP97-561-002]

Take notice that on April 27, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, Eighth Revised Sheet No. 301 and Fourth Revised Sheet No. 401A, with an effective date of June 1, 2001.

Tennessee states that the referenced sheet is being filed to comply with the Commission's “Order Granting Abandonment Authority” issued in the captioned proceeding on December 19, 1997. In compliance with the Order, Tennessee has revised Article XXXI of the General Terms and Conditions of its Tariff to reflect the Commission-approved language regarding gathering affiliate abuse and to reflect a revision to the General Terms and Conditions Index of Provisions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11651 Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

x ----------------­ IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

x ----------------­

LUIS RODRIGUEZ 

NOTICE OF THE 

BROOKFIELD 

v. PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

100 CHURCH LLC, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 05313 

__________________x 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC Co. LLC 

flk/a WFP Tower A Co. L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC G.P. Corp. f/k/a WFP 

Tower A Co. GP Corp., WFP Tower B Co. L.P., WFP Tower B Co. GP Corp., WFP 

Tower D Co. L.P. and WFP Tower D Co. GP Corp. (collectively the "Brookfield 

Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by 

Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above 

referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' Answer to Master Complaint, 

dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the matter ofIn re World Trade Center Lower 

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each ofthem, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 28 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

February --.!.L-2008 

Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee, LLP 

Iv 

Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 28 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009215EN.01000201.xml

| 9.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/2

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 215/02

| Member State | Sweden |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Storuman–Stockholm (Arlanda) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 January 2010 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications |
| Division for Transport |
| SE-103 33 Stockholm |
| SWEDEN |
| Tel. (Switchboard): +46 84051000 |
| Tel. (direct): +46 84055096 or +46 84053629 |
| Facsimile +46 84052298 |
| (Contact: Yosef Belachew or Lars Österberg) |
| E-mail: yosef.belachew@enterprise.ministry.se |
| lars.osterberg@enterprise.ministry.se |

Member State

Sweden

Concerned route

Storuman–Stockholm (Arlanda)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 January 2010

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications

Division for Transport

SE-103 33 Stockholm

SWEDEN

Tel. (Switchboard): +46 84051000

Tel. (direct): +46 84055096 or +46 84053629

Facsimile +46 84052298

(Contact: Yosef Belachew or Lars Österberg)

E-mail: yosef.belachew@enterprise.ministry.se

lars.osterberg@enterprise.ministry.se

---
Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01669-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 5 of 5
# C_2009279EN.01000602.xml

| 19.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/6

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on Mergers given at its meeting of 4 June 2009 regarding a draft Decision relating to Case COMP/M.4994 (2) — Electrabel/Compagnie Nationale du Rhône

Rapporteur: Latvia

2009/C 279/06

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the factors that were taken into account when calculating the level of the fine for Electrabel SA pursuant to Article 14(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (1). A minority abstain. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the factors that were taken into account when calculating the level of the fine for Electrabel SA pursuant to Article 14(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (1). A minority abstain.

1

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the actual level of the fine proposed by the Commission. A minority abstain. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the actual level of the fine proposed by the Commission. A minority abstain.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. A minority abstain. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. A minority abstain.

Official Journal of the European Union

---

(1)  OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301] 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Nuclear Management Company, LLC (the licensee) to withdraw its October 5, 1999, application for proposed amendment to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, located in Town of Two Creeks, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. 

The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical Specifications (TSs) to eliminate inconsistencies, principally related to decay heat removal. The amendment is no longer necessary because the inconsistencies are being corrected as part of a separate application dated November 15, 1999, to convert Point Beach's current TSs to improved TSs. The November 15, 1999, application is currently being reviewed by the staff of the Commission. 

                    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 17, 1999 (64 FR 62717). However, by letter dated December 19, 2000, the licensee withdrew the proposed change.                 

For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment dated October 5, 1999, as supplemented May 19, 2000, and the licensee's letter dated December 19, 2000, which withdrew the application for license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and accessible electronically through the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room link at the NRC Web site (http://www.nrc.gov). 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of January 2001.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Beth A. Wetzel, 

 Senior Project Manager, Section 1, Project Directorate III, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 01-1174 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-U
[No. 134251⁄2.

*En Banc.*

July 17, 1917.]

#### Everett Railway, Light & Water Company *et al., Appellants,*v. The City of Everett *et al.,*Respondents.2

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered November 18, 1915, dismissing an action to restrain the enforcement of an ordinance, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

Reversed.

*J. A. Coleman*and *James M. Hogan,*for appellants.

*Wm. A. Johnson,*for respondents.

2

Reported in 166 Pac. 655.

Per Curiam.

This case is in all respects the same as that of *Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Everett, ante*p. 259, 166 Pac. 650, with the exception that the ordinance granting the franchise is not set out in full in the complaint. The respondents seek to differentiate it by the contention that the description of the franchise as epitomized in *699the complaint contains nothing which is in any wise affected hy the license tax imposed hy the charter and ordinance set forth in the ease cited. But, in our opinion, sufficient is alleged to show the nature of the franchise under which the appellant is acting, and that its terms would be infringed hy the imposition of the charge imposed hy the charter and ordinance. For the reasons stated in the case cited, the judgment is reversed with instructions to overrule the demurrer.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L UT HE R G. J AMI S ON , P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. GA RY SW ARTHOU T, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 17096 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 7 -C V -0 1 7 8 2 -P JH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia P hy l l i s J . H a m i l t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , S IL V E R M A N , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erL u th erG . Jam iso n ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e have j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 . W e m aya f f irm o n an yg r o u n ds up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . See W a sh i n g to n v. L a m

p ert , 4 2 2 F .3 d8 6 4 , 8 6 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . 

# FI LED SEP 30 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 17096 2 J a m i s on c ont e nds tha tthe B oar d of P r i s on T e rm s ’ s 2004 de c i s i on f i ndi ng h i m u n s u i t ab l e f

o rp ar o l e v i o l a t e s Ca l i f

o rn i al aw an di s n o ts up p o rt e db ys o me e v id e n c e . E v e n a s s u m in g th a t h is p e titio n is tim e ly , J a m is o n is n o t e n title dto r e lie f . F ir s t, th e r e c o r dr e f

le c ts th a t J a m is o n r e c e iv e da ll p r o c e s s th a t w a s du e . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 131 S . C t . 859, 862- 63 ( 2011) ( pe rc ur i a m ) . S e c ond, J a m is o n ’s c h a lle n g e s to th e ap p lic a tio n o f C a lif o rn ialaw ar e n o t c o g n iz ab le in fed eral h ab eas p ro ceed i n g s. See L ew is v. Jef f ers , 497 U . S . 764, 780 ( 1990) ( “[ F ]e d e r a l h ab e a s c o rp u s r e lie f d o e s n o t lie f

o re rr o r s o f

s ta te law [ .]” ) ; 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 25 4(a) . W e d e c l i n e t o c o n s i d e rJ a mi s o n ’ s i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t an c e o f

c o u n s e l c l a i m, ra i se d for the fi rs tt i m e on app ea l , because i tre l at es t o cou nsel ’ s per form ance s ub s e q u e n t to th e c la im s r a is e din th e d is tr ic t c o u rt. P e te rA . F u r s t’s m o tio n to w ith d r aw a s J a m is o n ’s c o u n s e l is g r an te d . AF F I RME D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 96N-0393]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION: 

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “MedWatch: The FDA Medical Products Reporting Program” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark L. Pincus, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1471.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of November 16, 2000 (65 FR 69314), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0291.  The approval expires on April 30, 2003.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: May 2, 2001.

William K. Hubbard,

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.

[FR Doc. 01-11453  Filed 5-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05763-JSR     Document 37      Filed 09/28/2007     Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of i3 Mobile, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward J. Fletcher,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Edward J. Fletcher
------------------------
Edward J. Fletcher
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2009099EN.01000701.xml

| 30.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/7

---

Update of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 316, 28.12.2007, p. 1; OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 16; OJ C 177, 12.7.2008, p. 9; OJ C 200, 6.8.2008, p. 10; OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 13; OJ C 3, 8.1.2009, p. 10; OJ C 37, 14.2.2009, p. 10; OJ C 64, 19.3.2009, p. 20)

2009/C 99/05

The publication of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security.

FRANCE

Amendment of the information published in OJ C 37, 14.2.2009

Amendment of the information published in OJ C 37, 14.2.2009

Air borders

Air borders

New border crossing point:

| — | Albert-Bray |
| --- | --- |

—

Albert-Bray

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       119,931
<OTHER-SE>                                   (248,471)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 19


              Schedule of certain documents substantially
              identical to filed documents with parties thereto
              and other material differing details

19.a   Parties to Restricted Share Agreement in substantially the form set
       forth in Exhibit 10.w to Form-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
       1997:

                        Paul R. D'Aloia
                        Thomas A. Frederick
                        Carol A. Gebhart
                        Don R. Graber
                        Timothy G. Howard
                        Nancy A. Michaud
                        Christopher W. Snyder
                        John M. Stoner
                        I. Edward Tonkon II