Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2001 / Notices 22629

Singapore FTA establish a common

external tariff and forego preferential

rules of origin?

Request for Comments

Request for public comment on

specific rules of origin for the FTAA, the

Chile FTA and the Singapore FTA.

Those persons wishing to provide

written comments should submit twenty

(20) typed copies, no later than noon,

May 25, 2001, to Gloria Blue, Executive

Secretary, Trade Policy Staff Committee,

Office of the U.S. Trade Representative,

Room F516, 1724 F Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20508. Nonconfidential

comments may be submitted via the

Internet to gblue@ustr.gov. Comments

should clearly state the position taken

and present evidence to support that

position. Any business confidential

material must be clearly marked as such

on the cover page (or letter) and

succeeding pages. Such submissions

must be accompanied by a

nonconfidential summary thereof.

Nonconfidential submissions will be

available for public inspection at the

USTR Reading Room, Office of the U.S.

Trade Representative, Room 3, 1724 F

Street, NW., Washington, DC. An

appointment to review the file may be

made by calling Brenda Webb at (202)

395–6186. The Reading Room is open to

the public from 10 a.m. to 12 noon and

from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through

Friday.

Carmen Suro-Bredie,

Chair, Trade Policy Staff Committee.

[FR Doc. 01–11306 Filed 5–3–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public

Comment on Surplus Property Release

at Smyrna Airport, Smyrna, Tennessee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 49

U.S.C. 47153(c), notice is being given

that the FAA is considering a request

from the Smyrna/Rutherford County

Airport Authority to waive the

requirement that a 23.934-acre parcel of

surplus property, located at the Smyrna

Airport, be used for aeronautical

purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before June 4, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice

may be mailed or delivered in triplicate

to the FAA at the following address:

Memphis Airports District Office, 3385

Airways Boulevard, Suite 302,

Memphis, TN 38116–3841.

In addition, one copy of any

comments submitted to the FAA must

be mailed or delivered to Mr. John R.

Black, Executive Director of the

Smyrna/Rutherford County Airport

Authority at the following address: 660

Fitzhugh Blvd., Smyrna, TN 37167.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cynthia K. Wills, Program Manager,

Memphis Airports District Office, 3385

Airways Boulevard, Suite 302,

Memphis, TN 38116–3841, (901) 544–

3495 extension 16. The application may

be reviewed in person at this same

location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

is reviewing a request by Smyrna/

Rutherford County Airport Authority to

release 25.934 acres of surplus property

at the Smyrna Airport. The property

will be purchased by the Town of

Smyrna and used for the expansion of

the Smyrna Wastewater Treatment

Plant. The property fronts East Sam

Ridley Parkway and is adjacent and east

of the existing Smyrna Wastewater

Treatment Plan. The expansion

activities will include two(2) aeration

basins and two(2) clarifying ponds. The

net proceeds from the sale of this

property will be used for airport

purposes. The USDA has evaluated the

proposed use of the land for expansion

of the wastewater treatment facility and

has indicated the proposed usage will

be compatible with airport operations if

USDA recommendations are followed.

Any person may inspect the request

in person at the FAA office listed above

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. In addition, any person may,

upon request, inspect the request, notice

and other documents germane to the

request in person at the Smyrna/

Rutherford County Airport Authority.

Issued in Memphis, Tennessee, on April

26, 2001.

Charles L. Harris,

Assistant Manager, Memphis Airports District

Office, Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 01–11264 Filed 5–3–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–20001–34]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of

Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior

petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption part 11 of Title 14, Code

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this

notice contains a summary of

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received. The purpose of this

notice is to improve the public’s

awareness of, and participation in, this

aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities.

Neither publication of this notice nor

the inclusion or omission of information

in the summary is intended to affect the

legal status of any petition or its final

disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Forest Rawls (202) 267–8033, Sandy

Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–7271, or

Vanessa Wilkins (202) 267–8029, Office

of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal

Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591.

This notice is published pursuant to

14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 30,

2001.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Disposition of Petitions

Docket No: FAA–2001–9034.

Petitioner: Bombardier Aerospace,

Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

25.1435(b)(1).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit type certification

of the Model BD–100–1A10 by

conducting applicable testing specified

in accordance with (1) hydraulic system

components, lines, and installation are

individually tested to 1.5 times the

design operating pressure as part of

qualifications tests, and (2) the complete

hydraulic system is functionally tested

on the airplane over the range of motion

of all associated user systems at the

system relief pressure setting of 3,400

psid. Partial Grant, 04/18/2001,

Exemption No. 7508.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8866.

Petitioner: Celsius Aerotech, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 FR

145.45(f).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Celsius to

establish and maintain a number of

fixed locations within Celsius for the

repair station Inspection Procedures

Manual (IPM) and to assign IPM’s to key

individuals within departments. Grant,

04/10/2001, Exemption No. 6657B.

22630 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2001 / Notices

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9091

(previously Docket No. 29479).

Petitioner: Skydive U, Inc. formerly

known as Skydive Utah, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

105.43(a).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit SUI’s nonstudent

foreign nationals to participate in SUIsponsored parachute jumping events

held at SUI’s facilities without

complying with the parachute

equipment and packing requirement of

§ 105.43(a). Grant, 04/10/2001,

Exemption No. 6928A.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8741

(previously Docket No. 29218).

Petitioner: Cessna Aircraft Company.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

91.409(b).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit owners and

operators of Cessna Model 172R, 172S,

and 182S (C–172R, C–172S, and C–

182S, respectively) airplanes to use

Cessna’s PhaseCard Inspection Program

rather than completing the required 100-

hour inspection. Grant, 04/10/201,

Exemption No. 6901B.

Docket No.: 29975

Petitioner: Express Airlines I, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

121.434(c)(1)(ii).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Express to

substitute a qualified and authorized

check airman in place of an FAA

inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in

command who is completing initial or

upgrade training specified in § 121.424

during at least one flight leg that

includes a takeoff and a landing. Grant,

04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7504.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8877.

Petitioner: Piedmont Aviation

Services, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

25.857(c), and 25.858, 121.314(c).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit two Boeing

Model 737–200 airplanes to operate

from March 20, 2001, until September

15, 2001, without being fitted with fire

suppression equipment. Denial, 03/13/

2001, Exemption No. 7457.

Docket No.: FAA–2000–8492.

Petitioner: The Boeing Company.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

25.1435(b)(1).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit amended type

certification of the Boeing Models 777–

200LR and 777–300ER by conducting a

3400 psig (the system relief pressure)

test of the modified or added hydraulic

tubing runs and any rerouted sections

while verifying that adequate clearances

exist. Partial Grant, 03/28/2001,

Exemption No. 7478.

[FR Doc. 01–11259 Filed 5–3–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–2001–35]

Petitions for Exemption, Summary of

Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior

petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption part 11 of Title 14, Code

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this

notice contains a summary of

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received. The purpose of this

notice is to improve the public’s

awareness of, and participation in, this

aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities.

Neither publication of this notice nor

the inclusion or omission of information

in the summary is intended to affect the

legal status of any petition or its final

disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Forest Rawls (202) 267–8033, Sandy

Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–7271, or

Vanessa Wilkins (202) 267–8029, Office

of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal

Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591.

This notice is published pursuant to

14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 30,

2001.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9010.

Petitioner: Kitty Hawk Charters, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Kitty Hawk to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/16/2001, Exemption No. 7506.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8787.

Petitioner: Flight Alaska, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Flight Alaska to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/16/2001, Exemption No. 7505.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8865.

Petitioner: Corporate Air, LLC.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Corporate Air to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7498.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9033.

Petitioner: Silverhawk Aviation, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Silverhawk to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7499.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9105.

Petitioner: Ameristar Jet Charter, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.13(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Ameristar to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7500.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9031.

Petitioner: Houston Helicopters, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit HHI to operate

certain aircraft under part 135 without

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder

installed in the aircraft. Grant, 04/12/

2001, Exemption No. 7501.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9100.

Petitioner: Tex-Air Helicopters, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Tex-Air to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/12/2001, Exemption No. 7502.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8871.

Petitioner: Mentone Flying Club, Inc.

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR

135.231, 135.255, 135.353, and

appendixes I and J to part 121.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Mentone to

conduct sightseeing flights at Fulton

County Airport for the one-day Round

Barn Festival charitable event in June

2001, for compensation or hire, without

complying with certain anti-drug and

alcohol misuse prevention requirements

of part 135. Grant, 04/12/2001,

Exemption No. 7503.