alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit
  99.31

CERTIFICATION
  OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER IN ACCORDANCE
  WITH SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



|I, Michael
      J. Sabia, Chief Executive Officer of Bell Canada, certify that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1.                                                                              
|2.                                                                              
|3.                                                                              
|4.                                                                              
|a)                                                                              
|b)                                                                              
|c)                                                                              
|d)                                                                              
|5.                                                                              
|a)                                                                              
|b)                                                                              



|April
        14, 2004                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(signed) Michael J. Sabia                                                   
|Michael
        J. Sabia
        Chief Executive Officer
        Bell Canada



---

Exhibit
  99.31

**CERTIFICATION OF
  THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER IN ACCORDANCE
  WITH SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|I, Siim
      A. Vanaselja, Chief Financial Officer of Bell Canada, certify that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1.                                                                               
|2.                                                                               
|3.                                                                               
|4.                                                                               
|a)                                                                               
|b)                                                                               
|c)                                                                               
|d)                                                                               
|5.                                                                               
|a)                                                                               
|b)                                                                               



|April
        14, 2004                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(signed) Siim A. Vanaselja                                                   
|Siim
        A. Vanaselja
        Chief Financial Officer
        Bell Canada



---
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute 

controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance 

with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

NO. COA13-1166

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 18 February 2014

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. Cumberland County

No. 11 CRS 61036

EDDIE MCLEAN

Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 25 June 2013 by 

Judge James F. Ammons, Jr., in Cumberland County Superior Court. 

Heard in the Court of Appeals 27 January 2014.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General 

Sherri Horner Lawrence, for the State.

Peter Wood for Defendant.

DILLON, Judge.

On appeal from his district court conviction, Eddie McLean 

(“Defendant”) pled guilty in superior court to assault on a 

female and stipulated to nineteen prior convictions resulting in 

a prior conviction level III. The Honorable James F. Ammons, 

Jr., suspended a sentence of 150 days in the Misdemeanant 

Confinement Program and placed Defendant on unsupervised 

probation for 60 months. The judgment includes the requisite
-2-

finding by Judge Ammons that it was necessary to impose a period 

of probation longer than the 18-month presumptive term

prescribed by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1343.2(d)(1) (2011). 

Defendant filed notice of appeal.

Counsel appointed to represent Defendant is unable to 

identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful 

argument for relief on appeal and asks that this Court conduct 

its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. He

shows to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied 

with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 

L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 

S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising Defendant of his right to file 

written arguments with this Court and providing him with the 

documents necessary for him to do so.

Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own 

behalf with this Court, and a reasonable time for him to do so 

has expired. In accordance with Anders, we have fully examined 

the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit 

appear therefrom. We have been unable to find any possible 

prejudicial error and conclude that the appeal is wholly 

frivolous.

AFFIRMED.
-3-

Chief Judge MARTIN and Judge HUNTER, JR., concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 10-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 10-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 10-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 3 of 3
#### ABRAHAM SOLOMON *v.*CONNECTICUT MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 854 (AC 24782), is denied.

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*907
      *Abraham Solomon,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*Patrick B. Kwanashie,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided February 16, 2005
# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

Image Entertainment,
Inc.Chatsworth, California

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-138701, No.
333-121912 and No. 333-128487), Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-128535) and
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-119187, No. 333-69623, No. 33-65121 and No.
33-59353) of Image Entertainment, Inc. of our report dated June 29, 2007, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule for the year ended March 31, 2007, which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN LLP

Los Angeles, California June 29, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22590-22591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel ZDK1 GRB-7 C1.
    Date: May 24, 2001.

[[Page 22591]]

    Time: 11:00 am to 12:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Democracy Plaza II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Rm #754, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Lakshmanan Sankaran, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 754, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-7799.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: April 26, 2001.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-11186 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-01515-AKH Document 13 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01515-AKH Document 13 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 9      Filed 12/03/2007     Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

WAYNE PROPERTY ACQUISITION, INC.

v.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE 

TOWNSHIP OF RADNOR AND BRADLEY 

MORTENSEN, SUSAN STERN, WARREN 

AYRES AND SUSAN AYERS

PETITION OF: RADNOR TOWNSHIP 

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 457 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

WAYNE PROPERTY ACQUISITION, INC.

v.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE 

TOWNSHIP OF RADNOR AND BRADLEY 

MORTENSEN, SUSAN STERN, WARREN 

AYRES AND SUSAN AYERS

PETITION OF: BRADLEY MORTENSEN, 

SUSAN STERN, WARREN AYRES AND 

SUSAN AYERS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 458 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21388-21389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Grant Program for Strategies for Improving Health Risk 
Communication Related to Military Deployments Among Military Personnel, 
Veterans, Their Family Members, and Their Health Care Providers, PA# 
01021

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease

[[Page 21389]]

Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.
    <IT>Name: <RM>Disease, Disability and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel: Grant Program for Strategies for Improving 
Health Risk Communication Related to Military Deployments among 
Military Personnel, Veterans, their Family Members, and their Health 
Care Providers, PA# 01021.
    <IT>Times and Dates: <RM>8 a.m.-9:15 a.m., June 4, 2001 (Open), 
9:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m., June 4, 2001 (Closed), 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., June 
5, 2001 (Closed).
    <IT>Place: <RM>Holiday Inn Select Conference Center, 130 Clairemont 
Avenue, Decatur, GA 30030.
    <IT>Status: <RM>Portions of the meeting will be closed to the 
public in accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) 
and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Deputy Director 
for Program Management, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    <IT>Matters to be Discussed: <RM>The meeting will include the 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response 
to PA# 01021.
    <IT>Contact Person for More Information: <RM>Drue Barrett, Ph.D., 
Chief, Veterans' Health Activity Working Group, National Center for 
Environmental Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, MS E-19, Atlanta, Ga. 
30333. Telephone 404/639-4862, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2044484211604344430e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a0e02085b2a090e09440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign <CS>Federal Register <RM>notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for the both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 12, 2001.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 01-10612 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# CE2010285EN.01011601.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 285/116 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 285/116

---

Tuesday 24 November 2009Macro-financial assistance to Serbia *

P7_TA(2009)0073

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision providing macro-financial assistance to Serbia (COM(2009)0513 – C7-0270/2009 – 2009/0145(CNS))

2010/C 285 E/22

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2009)0513),

having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0270/2009),

having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0061/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         148,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,691
<INVENTORY>                                    186,997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   700
<PP&E>                                         422,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                 180,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 657,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          500,685
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              211
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,372,554
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,215,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   657,456
<SALES>                                        121,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,401
<CGS>                                          100,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  292,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (287,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (287,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (287,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
```
EXHIBIT 99.2
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
```

```
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
In connection with the Annual Report of BMC Industries Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Curtis E. Petersen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
```

```
 
```

```
     1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
```

```
 
```

```
     2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
March 25, 2003
```

```
 
```

> /s/Curtis E. PetersenCurtis E. PetersenSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 15 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 15 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### GRAMPP v. DE PEYSTER.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

July 14, 1894.)

Statute of Frauds—Raising Objection on Appeal.

The defense of the statute of frauds is not available on appeal where it was not pleaded, and evidence of a paroi contract was received at the trial without objection.

*1040Appeal from judgment on report of referee.

Action by Martin Grampp against John Watts De Peyster. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before MAYHAM, P. J., and PUTNAM and HERRICK, JJ.

Collier, Collier & Browning (C. P. Collier, of counsel), for appellant.

A. Frank B. Chace, for respondent.

HERRICK, J.

The referee has found that during the year 1892 the plaintiff, by himself, his agents and employés, did extra work upon a church that was being erected at Madalin, N. Y. (cleaning, painting, etc.), amounting in value, for the labor and material so furnished, to the sum of $290.60; “that such extra work.was done at the request and under the direction of the defendant, and under nnd subsequent to the promise and agreement of the defendant to pay for the same.” Of course, if such findings of fact are correct, the judgment recovered in this case by the plaintiff necessarily follows; but the defendant and appellant contends that such findings of fact are not warranted by the evidence. The defendant contends that the evidence shows that the plaintiff, in truth and'fact, was employed by another or others than the defendant, and that the requests and promises made by him are within the statute of frauds,—being promises to pay for the debt, default, or miscarriage •of another,—and, not being in writing, are void. It seems to me that a discussion of the evidence in this case, to determine whether there was an original contract of hiring between the plaintiff and defendant, is unnecessary, because I think it must be conceded that, whatever view is taken of the evidence, it establishes one of two things,—either an original hiring between the plaintiff and defendant, or a promise or agreement on the part of the defendant to pay the plaintiff for work that he was doing, for which work the de-' fendant was not primarily, liable. Whichever conclusion we come to, the judgment must be sustained. If we arrive at the conclusion that it was an agreement to pay the debt of another, then the defense of the statute of frauds asserted by the defendant is not available to him now, because he did not raise it in his answer, and the evidence establishing such paroi contract to pay the debt of another was not objected to by him upon the trial. Crane v. Powell, 189 N. Y. 379, 34 N. E. 911. The judgment should be affirmed, with •costs. All concur.
ck0001641601-ex101_90.htm



Exhibit 10.1

RIVER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(the “Company”)

DIRECTOR FEE COMPENSATION PLAN

2019

The following is a general description of the compensation program with respect to directors of the Company. 

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Cash/Fees 




 

The board may from time to time establish director fees for board and committee meetings to be paid to all directors, including directors who are employed by the Company.  Fees will normally be paid in January for services rendered the previous year.  To the extent any fee is to be paid based on attendance, attendance in person and by telephone shall count equally as attendance.  New directors appointed during the year will be paid fees on a pro rata basis based on time of service.

 


	
 
	
2.
	
Equity Grants 




 

Any director may elect, at any time, to receive a grant of Company common stock, if available, in lieu of cash to be paid.  The election may be for 100 percent or a portion of the cash to be paid.  The board shall determine the value of the common stock to be issued based upon current information available to the board and deemed reasonable.  No fractional shares will be issued.  If a grant of Company common stock is elected, then any fractional shares will be paid in cash.


	
 
	
 

3.
	
 

Applicable Persons 




 

The compensation provided in this plan shall be effective for directors of the Company or any Affiliate of the Company.  “Affiliate” shall mean an entity which is a direct or indirect parent or subsidiary of the Company, as determined pursuant to Section 424 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


	
 
	
 

4.
	
 

Stock Grants 




 

All stock amounts set forth herein shall be subject to automatic adjustment in the event of any stock split or other recapitalization affecting the Company’s common stock.


	
 
	
 

5.
	
 

Amendments 




 

The board of directors shall periodically review this Plan to assess whether any amendments in the type and amount of compensation provided herein should be made.