alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011044EN.01017001.xml

| 11.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/170 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/170

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on freedom of movement for workers within the Union’

COM(2010) 204 final — 2010/0110 (COD)

2011/C 44/30

On 31 May 2010 the Council and on 8 June 2010 the European Parliament decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 46 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), on the

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on freedom of movement for workers within the Union

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on freedom of movement for workers within the Union

COM(2010) 204 final — 2010/0110 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 464th plenary session of 14 and 15 July 2010 (meeting of 14 July 2010), by 163 votes to 1 with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

th

Brussels, 14 July 2010.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---
Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 36 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH Document 36 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        30 April 2024    

                    U.S. Navy Seabees Join Forces with the U.S. Army and Norway for Bridge Construction                 
                BJERKVIK, Norway — In a display of international collaboration the U.S. Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 11, Norwegian Armed Forces and the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division joined forces to construct and maneuver across a medium girder bridge April 26-28 here testing            

        14 February 2024    

                    50 Years of Building and Restoring Maritime Capabilities: Celebrating the Underwater Construction Teams Anniversary                 
                The Navy’s Underwater Construction Teams (UCT) One and Two will celebrate half a century of subsurface construction progress and prowess Feb. 15.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*GLEN S. JACKSON

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 803 (AC 24141), is denied.

*910
      *Brian J. Woolf,*in support of the petition.

*Margaret Gaffney Radionovas,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2005
#### SCOVELL, WELLINGTON & CO. v. BRICKLEY. In re EARNEST A. SMITH *&*CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

May 15, 1923.)

No. 1615.

Bankruptcy <§=»440—Order allowing compensation for services rendered receivers not reviewable by appeal.

An order allowing a claim for services rendered the receivers of the bankrupt estate was not reviewable by appeal, under Bankruptcy Act, § 25a (Comp. St. § 9609), the order being an administrative matter;- nor, where the case presented only questions of fact, could the appeal be treated by the Circuit Court of Appeals as a petition to revise in matter of law under section 24b (Comp. St. § 9608).

Appeal’ from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; James M. Morton, Judge.

In the matter of Earnest A. Smith & Co., bankrupt. Petition by Scovell, Wellington & Co., public accountants, for services rendered Bartholomew A. Brickley, trustee in bankruptcy. From an order awarding petitioners insufficient relief, they appealed to District Court, and from affirmance again appeal.

Affirmed.

George A. Sweetser, of Boston, Mass., for appellants.

Francis T. Leahy, of Boston, Mass., for appellee.

Before BINGHAM, JOHNSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ig=»For other cases see same topic *&*KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests *&*Indexes

*72PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal under section 25a, c. 541, of the Bankruptcy Act of July 1, 1898 (Comp. St. § 9609), from an order of the District Court' ¿lowing the appellants the sum of $2,000 for services performed for the receivers of the bankrupts’ estate. The claim, as presented to the trustee, was for the sum of $4,037.52. It was allowed by the referee at $2,000, from which order both parties petitioned the District Court for a review.

If the case can be regarded as properly before us on appeal under section 25a, which we think cannot be done, as the order allowing the bill against the receivers' was an administrative matter (O’Brien v. Ely, 195 Fed. 64, 115 C. C. A. 80; Davidson & Co. v. Friedman, 140 Fed. 853, 72 C. C. A. 553; Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. Switzer, 153 Fed. 362, 82 C. C. A. 438; In re Kinnane Co.’s Estate, 242 Fed. 769, 155 C. C. A. 357), we are not inclined to disturb the finding of the two lower tribunals, as we do not regard it as clearly against the weight of the evidence and wrong.

Then again, if the case as presented raised only questions of law, so that the appeal could be treated by this court as a petition to revise in matter of law under section 24b, being Comp. St. § 9608 (Chesapeake Shoe Co. v. Seldner, 122 Fed. 593, 58 C. C. A. 261; Gaudette v. Graham, 164 Fed. 311, 90 C. C. A. 243), we do not think the case can be so regarded, for, as we view it, it presents only a question of fact. If the referee received evidence that should have been excluded, or made erroneous rulings of law, there is nothing in the record to show that the District Court, in reviewing the case, considered such evidence, or approved such rulings in reaching his conclusion.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed, and the appellee recovers his costs of appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,789)
<INVENTORY>                                     65,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,438
<PP&E>                                         214,240
<DEPRECIATION>                               (121,149)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,349
<BONDS>                                         51,236
<COMMON>                                        16,213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,546
<SALES>                                        684,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               684,752
<CGS>                                          588,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  588,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   726
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,039)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,582)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.78)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


SUMMARY OF 2003 SENIOR EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN                    EXHIBIT 10.33

A targeted bonus equal to 60% of the president's base compensation, 50% of the
base compensation for the senior vice president of operations and 40% of the
base compensation of the other senior executives is payable for the fiscal year
2003 upon achievement of performance goals. At the targeted bonus level, fifty
percent of the bonus is based upon achievement of targeted net revenue growth
(net of third party royalties) and fifty percent is based upon achievement of
targeted earnings per share levels. Actual bonuses may be greater or lesser than
the targeted bonus levels, dependent upon deviation in actual performance from
performance goals. Participating senior executives must be employed by the
Company at the date of the payment of the bonus.
JUAN OSCAR DOMINGUEZ , Petitioner,

v.
STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3133

Opinion filed September 8, 2016.
Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Juan Oscar Dominguez, pro se , Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM. The pe tition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated appeal from the February 1, 2016, judgment and sentence in Duval County Circuit
Court case number 16

- 2013

- CF

- 008838

- AXXX

- MA. Upon issuance of mandate in2 this cause, a copy of thi s opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.
M AKAR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of TE Products Pipeline Company, LimitedPartnership (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30,2005 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof, I, William G. Manias, Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the general partner of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ WILLIAM G. MANIAS                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| William G. Manias                          |   |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| TEPPCO GP, Inc., General Partner      |   |

 

June 16,2006

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership and will beretained by TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,


CHAPTER
63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intermec, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended September 28, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lanny
H. Michael, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Lanny
      H. MichaelLanny
      H. MichaelChief Financial
      OfficerNovember 4,
      2008
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6579** 

LINWOOD BERNARD SAWYER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. T. S. Ellis III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00749

- TSE

- TCB )

Submitted : September 23 , 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Linwood Bernard Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Theresa Armstrong, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM: Linwood Bernard Sawyer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2 253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this stan dard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When th e district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85
. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sawyer has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argumen t because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-05738-PKC-AJP Document 8 Filed 08/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Accounting Office

The Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards will meet Wednesday, May 16, 2001, from 12:30 to 4:30 p.m., and Thursday, May 17, 2001, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. in room 7C13 of the General Accounting Office Building, 441 G Sreet, NW., Washington, DC.

The Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards will hold a meeting to discuss issues that may impact government auditing standards. The meeting is open to the public. Any interested person who plans to attend the meeting as an observer should present a copy of this meeting notice and a form of picture identification to the GAO Security Desk on the day of the meeting to obtain access to the GAO Building. Council discussions and reviews are open to the public. Members of the public will be provided an opportunity to address the Council with a brief (five minute) presentation on the afternoon of Thursday, May 17.

For further information or to notify the Council of your intention to address the Council, please contact Marcia Buchanan, Assistant Director, Government Auditing Standards, 202-512-9321.

                    Please check the Government Auditing Standards web page                     *(www.gao.gov/​govaud/​ybk01.htm)*                     one week prior to the meeting for a final agenda.                

Marcia B. Buchanan,

Assistant Director.

[FR Doc. 01-11679  Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 27 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 27 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 18 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 18 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01659-AKH Document 18 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
SCWC-29649 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

DANIEL K. KANAHELE, WARREN S. BLUM, LISA BUCHANAN, 

JAMES L. CONNIFF, and CAMBRIA MOSS, 

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

MAUI COUNTY COUNCIL and COUNTY OF MAUI, 

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

HONUA#ULA PARTNERS, LLC, 

Respondent/Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 29649; CIV. NO. 08-1-0115(3))

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court, filed

on August 8, 2013, is corrected as follows:

1. On page 5, line 13: 

Change “t 12:51 p.m.” to “at 12:51 p.m.”

2. On page 35, line 8: 

Change “out” to “outside”

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-29649

30-AUG-2013

09:25 AM
3. On page 56, footnote 25: 

Delete the period that precedes the parenthesis at the

end of the footnote

4. On page 56, footnote 25: 

Insert a period outside the parenthesis at the end of the

footnote

5. On page 56, footnote 27, line 7: 

Insert a space between “§ 92-8” and “(2012)”

6. On page 63, line 2: 

Delete “committee”

7. On page 80, in the attorney credits: 

Insert an “s” after “respondent” in “Mary Blaine Johnston

for respondent Maui County Council and County in Maui”

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary

steps to notify the publishing agencies of these changes. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 30, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Clear All

        01 December 2023    

                    Navy Reserve Launches Mobilization and Deployment Support Command (MDSC)                 
                NORFOLK, Va - Mobilization and Deployment Support Command (MDSC) officially launched during a ribbon-cutting ceremony on Naval Station Norfolk, December 1, 2023.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#                                                                         USS Laboon Sailors Provide Assistance to Distressed Mariners                                                                    

##### by USS Laboon Public Affairs

13 March 2024
                240311-N-DY413-3143 GULF OF ADEN (March 11, 2024) Sailors from the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Laboon (DDG 58) approach a disabled vessel in the Gulf of Aden, March 11, to assist three stranded mariners. USS Laboon is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations to help ensure maritime security and stability in the Middle East region.                            240311-N-DY413-3143                            240311-N-DY413-3143 GULF OF ADEN (March 11, 2024) Sailors from the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Laboon (DDG 58) approach a disabled vessel in the Gulf of Aden, March 11, to assist three stranded mariners. USS Laboon is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations to help ensure maritime security and stability in the Middle East region.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Official U.S. Navy photoVIRIN: 240311-N-DY413-3143GULF OF ADEN - Crew members from the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Laboon (DDG 58) provided assistance to three mariners on a disabled vessel in the international waters of the Gulf of Aden, March 11.

Following a distress signal from the mariners, Laboon Sailors embarked a rigid-hull inflatable boat to offer assistance. After determining the vessel was disabled, the Sailors brought the mariners back to their ship.

None of the mariners appeared to be injured. They were turned over to a regional coast guard.

“The Sailors of Team Laboon continue to prove their excellence,” said Cmdr. Eric Blomberg, Laboon commanding officer. “Assisting mariners at sea is inherently dangerous, but the team executed without hesitation – without fear – to extend their compassion to people in distress. I’m incredibly proud to be a part of this team.”

Laboon is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations to help ensure maritime security and stability in the Middle East region. 

Tags:
**USS Laboon (DDG 58)