alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 15 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 15 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 24 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
# C_2009323EN.01002501.xml

| 31.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/25

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2010

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

2009/C 323/07

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending the implementing Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 289, 28.11.2009, p. 6.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2010 | ... | 1,24 | 1,24 | 4,92 | 1,24 | 2,39 | 1,24 | 1,88 | 6,94 | 1,24 | 1,24 | 1,24 | 1,24 | 7,03 | 1,24 | 1,24 | 8,70 | 1,24 | 15,11 | 1,24 | 1,24 | 4,49 | 1,24 | 9,92 | 1,02 | 1,24 | 1,24 | 1,16 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.1.2010

...

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

4,92

4,92

1,24

1,24

2,39

2,39

1,24

1,24

1,88

1,88

6,94

6,94

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

7,03

7,03

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

8,70

8,70

1,24

1,24

15,11

15,11

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

4,49

4,49

1,24

1,24

9,92

9,92

1,02

1,02

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,24

1,16

1,16

---
#### FLEET NATIONAL BANK *v.*CYNTHIA L. LAHM

*Glenn T. Terk*and *P. Jo Anne Burgh,*in support of the petition.

*Houston Putnam Lowry*and *Julie A. Morgan,*in opposition.

Decided February 10, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 403 (AC 24653), is denied.
Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 33 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 17 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 17 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009098EN.01001001.xml

| 29.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/10

---

Update of the notification by Lithuania under Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

The possibility for a Member State to provide by law for an obligation to hold or carry papers and documents pursuant to Article 21(c)

2009/C 98/05

LITHUANIA

LITHUANIA

Amendment to the information provided by Lithuania and published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ C 18 of 24 January 2008).

Amendment to the information provided by Lithuania and published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ C 18 of 24 January 2008).

Lithuanian national legislation does not lay down an obligation to hold or carry papers and documents at all times.

However, pursuant to the Law on the Legal Status of Aliens (Article 3(4)), when requested to do so by a police officer or any other law enforcement official, foreign nationals must present a personal identification document (travel document, residence permit or the like), as well as other documents specifying the purpose and conditions of their presence in the Republic of Lithuania and attesting to the lawfulness of their stay there.

Furthermore, the Law on National Borders and their Protection (Article 17(5)) and other legislative acts lay down that persons not holding personal identification documents are prohibited from entering areas subject to border regulations. Persons aged 16 and over who are nationals of the Republic of Lithuania or another European Union Member State or who enjoy the Community right to free movement are prohibited from entering border areas without personal identification documents. Persons aged under 16 who are nationals of the Republic of Lithuania or another European Union Member State or who enjoy the Community right to free movement are prohibited from entering border areas without a birth certificate, or a child's travel document or other personal identification documents. Other persons are prohibited from entering border areas if they are not in possession of a valid third-country citizen's passport or equivalent travel documents, an alien's passport or other personal identification attesting to the lawfulness of their stay in the Republic of Lithuania.

Persons may enter guarded national border areas only when in possession of a single-use or permanent permit issued by the State Border Guard Service, together with the documents referred to above. Such permits are not required in the case of persons crossing the national border and entering a guarded national border area by land, water or air pursuant to procedures laid down in laws and other legislation of the Republic of Lithuania.

---
EXHIBIT 22
    
                                 JLG INDUSTRIES, INC.
                              LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                   JULY 31, 1996   




                                                                  Percent of 
                                                                  Voting
                                                                  Securities
                                               Jurisdiction of    Owned by
     Subsidiary                                Incorporation      the Company

JLG Equipment Services, Inc.                   Pennsylvania        100%

Fulton International, Inc.                     Delaware            100%

Fulton International Foreign
Sales Corporation                              Barbados            100%

Zontess Pty. Ltd.                              Australia           100%


The financial statements of the above listed subsidiaries are included in 
the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements incorporated herein by 
reference.
Robert J. Cosgrove (RC 8917) 

Cheryl D. Fuchs (CF 1116) 

WADE CLARK MULCAHY 

111 Broadway, 9th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

(212) 267-1900 

Attorneys for Defendant: New York University and 

New York University Real Estate Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------------- X 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

07CV1667 (AKH) 

----------------------------------------------------------------------- X 

FABIO MORALES,

Plaintiff, NOTICE OF 

APPEARANCE 

-against- 

 

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, 

 Defendant. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------- X 

To: The Clerk of the Court and All Parties of Record 

 Please enter the appearance of the undersigned as counsel of record for defendant 

New York University. 

 

Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 34 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 4
The undersigned certify that they are admitted to practice before this Court. 

Dated: New York, New York 

February 4, 2008 

WADE CLARK MULCAHY 

 /s/ 

_______________________ 

By: Robert J. Cosgrove (RC 8917) 

Cheryl D. Fuchs (CF 1116) 

Attorneys for NYU Defendants 

111 Broadway, 9th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

(212) 267-1900 

Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 34 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 2 of 4
STATE OF NEW YORK ) 

COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) ss: 

Sibil Miranda, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 

That I am not a party to the within action, am over 18 years of age and reside in 

Brooklyn, New York. 

 

That on February 4, 2008, deponent served the within Notice of Appearance upon the 

attorneys and parties listed below by electronic filing: 

TO: 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

THE LAW FIRM OF GREGORY J. 

CANNATA 

Plaintiffs’s Liaison Counsel 

233 Broadway 

New York, NY 10279 

Robert Grochow, Esq. 

ROBERT A. GROCHOW, P.C. 

Plaintiffs’s Liaison Counsel 

233 Broadway 

New York, NY 10279 

David Worby, Esq. 

WORBY GRONER EDELMAN & 

NAPOLI BERN, LLP 

Plaintiffs’s Liaison Counsel 

115 Broadway 

New York, NY 10006 

James E. Tyrrell, Jr., Esq. 

PATTON BOGGS LLP 

Defendants’ Liasion Counsel 

The Legal Center 

One Riverfront Plaza 

Newark, NJ 07102 

Richard Williamson, Esq. 

FLEMMING ZULACK WILLIAMSON 

ZAUDERER, LLP 

Defendants’ Liaison Counsel 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, NY 10006 

WILSON ELSER, ET AL 

Attorneys for Battery Park City Authority 

3 Gannett Drive 

White Plains, NY 10604 

ESCHEN, FRENKLE & WEISMAN, LLP 

Attorneys for Lionshead Development, 

LLC 

20 West Main Street 

Bay Shore, NY 11706 

ESCHEN, FRENKLE & WEISMAN, LLP 

Attorneys for Lionshead 110 Development, 

LLC 

20 West Main Street 

Bay Shore, NY 11706 

Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 34 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 3 of 4
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & 

OSHINSKY, LLP 

2101 L. Street N.W. 

Washington, DC 20037 

 /s/ 

___________________________ 

Sibil Miranda 

Sworn to before me this 

4

th day of February 2008 

/s/ 

___________________________ 

Notary Public

Case 1:07-cv-01667-AKH Document 34 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 4 of 4
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1425** 

DEREK N. JARVIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY , Defendant

- Appellee
.

**No. 10**  **- 1573** 

DEREK N. JARVIS, Plainti ff

- Appellant,

v. ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY, Defendant

- Appellee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Deborah K. Chasanow , Chief District Judge. ( 8:07

- cv - 03385

- DKC )

Submitted : December 17, 2010 Decided: January 20 , 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.2 Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Michelle Bodley Radcliffe, ISLER, D ARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court ’s order dismissing his civil action and ruling on related matters , and the later order denying his motion s to reconsider, for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and for transcripts at government
expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the distr ict court. Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services & Leasing
Co. , No. 8:07

- cv - 03385

- DK C (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2010 & May 11, 2010)
. We also deny Jarvis’ petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to recuse the magistrate judge and district judge who ruled on his cl aim s below. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v.
U .S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is ava ilable only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Jarvis has failed to establish the grounds needed for relief. See Shaw v. Martin , 733 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1984) (providing grounds needed for recusal)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the m aterials4 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

21MC103(AKH)

THOMAS MAHER, 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

07CV5416(AKH)

AMENDED NOTICE OF 

ADOPTION BY BLUE 

MILLENNIUM REALTY 

LLC OF ANSWER TO 

MASTER COMPLAINT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC

(hereinafter “Blue Millennium”) as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the 

above-referenced action, herein adopts Blue Millennium’s Answer to Master Complaint dated 

August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). To the extent that Blue Millennium’s Answer to the 

Master Complaint does not comprehensively address any of the specific allegations within the 

Check-Off Complaint in the above-captioned Matter, Blue Millennium denies the truth of such 

specific allegations. 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 24 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 4
WHEREFORE, Blue Millennium demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 February 28, 2008 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor 

New York, New York 10005 

(212) 687-0100 

TO: 

David L. Kremen 

Oshman & Mirisola 

42 Broadway, 10th Floor 

New York, New York 10004 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Bradford Stein, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 24 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 2 of 4
All Counsel via ECF 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 24 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on February 28, 2008, I caused to be filed and 

served the following document electronically via the Court’s ECF system upon the parties: 

1. Amended Notice of Blue Millennium’s Adoption of Answer to Master 

Complaint. 

Dated: February 28, 2008 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 24 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

GUELMER RENDON, 07-CV-45 10 (AKH)

Plaintiff, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

-against100 CHURCH LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel

for Defendants 100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a

SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. in the above-captioned action and all future

correspondence and papers filed or serviced in connection with the above-captioned action are to

be directed to the undersigned.

Dated: New York, New York

September 10, 2007

Yours etc.,

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

A ttorneys for Defendant

100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY

MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a SAPIR

REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP.

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062)

100 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

212 687-0100

212 687-0659 (Fax)

Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the following document

to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants 100 Church LLC and Zar Realty

Management Corp. nlkla Sapir Realty Management Corp.).

The undersigned further certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor P1aint~ffs

Dated: September 10, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

I Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

Is!

Stanley Goos

Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





For
      purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony Principe, the chief
      financial officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge:





(i)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/
                ANTHONY PRINCIPEAnthony
                Principe*Chief
                Financial Officer**On2
                Technologies, Inc.*








August
      2,
      2006
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 22 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 22 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 22 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 22 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 22 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 22 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 22 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 7 of 7
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DE NI S E HE L E N F UL E I HA N, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. W ELLS FA RG O BA N K , N A , D BA A m e r ic a ’s S e rv ic in g C o m p a n y ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 17337 D. C . No . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 1 8 7 7 - R C J - P AL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da R obe rtC . J one s , C hi e f

Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an dG O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D eni se H el en F ul ei han app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s s um m ary ju d g m e n t an dd is m is s a l o r d e rin h e ra c tio n a r is in g o u t o f f o r e c lo s u r e p r o c e e d in g s . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo. D o e v . A b b o tt 

# FI LED JU L 05 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 17337 2 L a b s. , 5 7 1 F. 3 d9 3 0 , 9 3 3 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e a f f i rm. C ontr a ryt o F ul e i ha n’ s c ont e nt i on, the di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notl a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o gr a ntj udgm e nti n he ra c t i on a ga i ns tde f e nda nt s a f

t e rs he ha d f

i l e d f or b a n k rup tc y . See 11 U . S . C . § 362( a ) ( 1) ( abankrupt c ype t i t i on s t ay s a n “ a c t i on or pr oc e e di ng a g a i n st

the debt or” ( em ph as i s a dd ed)) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g F u le ih an le a v e to f ile as e c o n da m e n d e dc o m p la in t w h e r e a m e n d m e n t w o u ldb e f u tile . See G ardn er v . M ar t i no , 563 F . 3d 981, 990 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( r e vi e w i ng f ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on a nd s t a t i ng tha t“ [ a ] di s tr i c tc ourtdoe s note rri n de ny i ng l e a ve t o a m e nd w he r e the am endm entw ou l d b e f

ut i l e” ). W e do n otconsi der m att er s notspec i fi ca l l y and di st i nct l y r ai se d and ar gu ed in th e o p e n in g b r ie f

, n o rm a tte r s r a is e df

o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See P ad get t v. W r i ght , 58 7 F . 3d 98 3, 98 5 n . 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c uri am ). F ul ei han’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RAIT Financial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack E. Salmon, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Jack E. Salmon                
|Jack E. Salmon                       
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|Date: May 11, 2009