alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 14

                   CODE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR SENIOR OFFICERS

In my role as a senior officer of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (the "Company") I
recognize that senior officers hold an important and elevated role in corporate
governance. I am uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that stakeholders'
interests are appropriately balanced, protected and preserved. Accordingly, this
Code provides principles to which senior officers are expected to adhere and
advocate. The Code embodies rules regarding individual and peer
responsibilities, as well as responsibilities to the Company, the public and
other stakeholders.

I certify to the Company that I adhere to and advocate the following principles
and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.

To the best of my knowledge and ability:

1.       I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts
         of interest in personal and professional relationships.

2.       I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete,
         objective, relevant, timely and understandable.

3.       I comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and
         local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory
         agencies.

4.       I act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and
         diligence without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my
         independent judgment to be subordinated.

5.       I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
         my work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to
         disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course of my work is
         not used for personal advantage.

6.       I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my
         constituents' needs.

7.       I proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
         peers in my work environment and community.

8.       I achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources
         employed or entrusted to me.



By /s/ Sandra Pautsky               By /s/ Carol J. Cooper
   --------------------------          ---------------------------
   Sandra Pautsky, President           Carol J. Cooper, Principal
   (Principal Executive                Financial Officer and
   Officer) and Director               Accounting Officer

DATE: May 31, 2005                     DATE: May 31, 2005
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

TN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

THOMAS COSTELLO (AND WIFE, TERRI 

COSTELLO) 

NOTICE OP THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OF AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, ET. AZ., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 5345 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower B Co L.P. and WFP Tower B Co. 

GP Corp. (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the 

Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield 

Parties' Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed 

in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbwsements. 

Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October IB 2007 

Faust~~e4, Sd: Blee, LLP 

By: FNillia~ J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

A ys the Brookfield Parties 

Two R` Street, 20'h Floor 

New· York, NY 10006 

(212)363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 14 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        11 April 2023    

                    Naval Oceanography Presents at DEPS Conference 2023                 
                SAN ANTONIO, Texas - Naval Oceanography Officers attending the Naval Postgraduate School presented their thesis and participated in the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) 2023 conference in San Antonio, Texas, April 3-6. The 2023 Annual DE S&T Symposium focused on sub-systems and component            

        11 August 2022    

                    25th Annual RoboSub Competition Showcases an Autonomous Future                 
                ARLINGTON, Va. - This past week, the 25th Annual RoboSub competition occurred at the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland. RoboSub is an international robotics competition where student teams design, build, test and operate their own robotic submarines — autonomous underwater vehicles            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 2, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-13363

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00165-CR-ORL-31-JGG

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES ROOSEVELT LEE,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(June 2, 2009)

Before BLACK, CARNES, and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
James Roosevelt Lee, a federal prisoner convicted of a crack cocaine

offense, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to

modify his sentence. Lee contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction based

on Amendment 706 to the sentencing guidelines, which lowered the base offense

levels applicable to certain crack cocaine offenses. The district court held that it

lacked the authority to resentence Lee based on Amendment 706 because Lee was

sentenced as a career offender. Lee argues that the was entitled to a reduction

because although he qualified as a career offender, the district court’s downward

variance of his sentence meant that he was not sentenced as one.

“We review de novo a district court’s conclusions about the scope of its

legal authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).” United States v. James, 548 F.3d

983, 984 (11th Cir. 2008). A district court may modify a term of imprisonment

where the defendant’s sentence was based on a sentencing range that was later

reduced by the Sentencing Commission. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Any reduction,

however, must be “consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the

Sentencing Commission.” Id. A sentence reduction is not “consistent with

applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission”—and

therefore not authorized under § 3582(c)(2)—if the amendment does not lower the

defendant’s guideline range. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B). A defendant sentenced

2
under the career-offender provision of § 4B1.1 of the guidelines is not entitled to

§ 3582 relief because Amendments 706 and 713 do not lower the applicable

guideline range for career offenders. See United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323,

1327 (11th Cir. 2008).

Although the district court applied a downward variance in sentencing Lee

originally, it still considered him a career offender. The district court never stated

that it did not consider Lee a career offender or that the career offender designation

overrepresented his criminal history. Instead, after explicitly discussing the

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and Lee’s extensive criminal history, the district court

applied a downward variance to reduce the sentencing disparity between Lee and a

codefendant. Because Lee was sentenced as a career offender, he is not entitled to

a sentence reduction under Amendment 706.

AFFIRMED.

3
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Unilever PLC, a corporation
organized under the laws of the United Kingdom (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2013as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Dated: 4 March 2014                      
|                                         
|/s/ Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman
|Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman    
|Chief Executive Officer                  
|                                         
|Dated: 4 March 2014                      
|                                         
|/s/ Raoul Jean-Marc Sidney Huet          
|Raoul Jean-Marc Sidney Huet              
|Chief Financial Officer
### MANDATE



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00686

- CV

Pamela Y. Kelley, Arthur Lee Kelley, Clara Brooks

, and Gary L. Leonard, Appellant s

v. LaVearn Ivey, Appellee Appealed from the 506th Judicial District Court of Waller County. (Tr. Ct.
No. 14

- 07

- 22640). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Donovan. Justices Christopher and Wise also participating.

TO THE 506TH JUDICIAL DISTR ICT COURT OF WALLER COUNTY,
GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on July 16 , 201 5 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its
order in these words: This cause, an appeal from the “Order Granting Plaintiff’s Application for Temporary Injunction,” signed August 18, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the order . We order the “Order Granting Plaintiff’s Application for Temporary Injunction” of the cou rt
below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s , Pamela Y. Kelley, Arthur Lee Kelley, Clara Brooks

, and Gary L. Leonard, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. WHEREFORE, W E COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.
WITNESS , the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost , Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, September 24, 2015.
Case 1:07-cv-05298-AKH Document 17 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05298-AKH Document 17 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05298-AKH Document 17 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05298-AKH Document 17 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05297-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05721-DLC Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID MICHAEL YOUNGER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. G. WIELENGA, Captain for S.B. County Sheriffs Dept., in his/her individual capacity; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 55948

D.C. No. 5:15

- cv
- 01964

- SVW

- JC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 11, 2019 **

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. David Michael Younger , a federal prisoner and former pretrial detainee,
appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his civil rights action
brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 18 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 55948

Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging that defendants’ surveillance policy
violated his rights to bodily privacy and relig ious freedom . We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. W e review de novo

. Torres v. City of Madera , 648 F.3d
1119, 1123 (9th Cir. 2011)

. We affirm.

To the extent that a Bivens remedy exists for Younger’ s Fourteenth
Amendment right to bodily privacy claim and First Amendment free exercise

claim , the district court properly granted summary judgment because Younger
failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants’ polic y

was not re asonably related to legitimate penological interests. See Turner v.
Safley , 428 U.S. 78, 89

- 91 (1987) (stating that a regulation impinging on First
Amendment rights is valid if it is reasonably related to legitimate penological
interests and articulating the factors for determining whether a prison regulation is
reasonably related to a legitimate penological interest); Byrd v. Maricopa Cty

. Bd.
of Supervisors , 845 F.3d 919 , 923 (9th Cir. 2017) (applying Turner rational
relationship test to pretrial detaine e’s right to bodily privacy claim, and explaining
that prison policy that allows for infrequent, irregular, or from a distance
observation may not constitute a constitutional violation) ; see also Ziglar v. Abassi , 137 S. Ct. 1843, 1857 (2017) ( cautioning a gainst further extensions of Bivens to3 18

- 55948

“new” contexts and requiring a special factors analysis before extending the Bivens
remedy ).
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 5 87 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Clear All

        05 December 2022    

                    Colombian Sailor Helps His Home Country During CP22                 
                COLOMBIA - (Nov. 17, 2022) Hospital ship USNS Comfort (T-AH 20) is currently conducting Continuing Promise 2022, a humanitarian and goodwill mission that is part of U.S. South Command’s Enduring Promise initiative. Comfort houses a large workforce of Sailors and Non-Governmental Organizations with            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11192]



[[Page 22593]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Application

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to amend endangered species recovery.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following applicant has applied for an amended permit to 
conduct certain activities with endangered species. This notice is 
provided pursuant to section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.).

Permit Number TE023308-2

    Applicant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Twin Cities Field 
Office, Bloomington, Minnesota (Russ Peterson, Field Supervisor).
    The applicant holds a permit to take (collect, hold in captivity, 
propagate, and release) endangered Higgins' eye pearlymussels 
(Lampsilis higginsi) from locations within their historic range in the 
States of Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. The applicant requests 
authorization to expand the geographical area permitted for 
reintroducing artificially propagated specimens into the wild to 
include all historical locations of the species, including mainstem and 
tributaries of the Upper Mississippi River including the Chippewa, St. 
Croix, Black and Wisconsin Rivers in Wisconsin; the Iowa, Cedar and 
Wapsipinicon Rivers in Iowa; the Illinois, Sangamon, and Rock Rivers in 
Illinois; and, the Minnesota River in Minnesota. This permit is for the 
enhancement of survival of the species in the wild to protect from 
zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) infestation, in the interest of 
recovery.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services 
Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056, and 
must be received within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review by any party who submits a written request for a 
copy of such documents to the following office within 30 days of the 
date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Ecological Services Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, 
Minnesota 55111-4056. Telephone: (612/713-5343); FAX: (612/713-5292).

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
Charlie Wooley,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort 
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 01-11192 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Clear All

        05 April 2023    

                    Medical Inspector General Evaluates Readiness at Naval Medical Forces Atlantic                 
                The Navy’s Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED) Medical Inspector General (MEDIG) evaluated the performance, efficiency, and mission readiness at Commander, Naval Medical Forces Atlantic (NMFL) during a scheduled command inspection onboard Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads Portsmouth            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


December 20, 2019


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 457 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on December 19, 2019, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-233802) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                           


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
Clear All

        18 August 2023    

#                     Large Scale Exercise 2023 Commanders Interview Transcript                 

                LSE 23 Commanders Interview Transcript11 AUG 2023 CAPT HechtOkay everybody, we'll go ahead and get started. Good afternoon, and let me begin by saying to the members of the media that joined us here today: thank you very much for your coverage of Large Scale Exercise 23. We're really appreciative of            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Seguridad contra 

incendios durante 

alquiler a corto plazo

Muchas personas disfrutan al alquilar viviendas o apartamentos 

para vacacionar. Estos alquileres no cuentan con reglamentos como 

los hoteles o moteles. Mientras alquile una vivienda, incorpore las 

mismas medidas de seguridad que practica en su hogar.

Asegúrese de:

ĵ Que todos conozcan la dirección del alquiler.

ĵ Que todos conozcan dos formas de salir de cada habitación y del alquiler en 

caso de que haya una emergencia. 

ĵ Que funcionen los detectores de humo en cada habitación y cada piso del 

alquiler.

ĵ El alquiler tenga detectores de monóxido de carbono que funcionen en cada 

piso.

ĵ Que usted pueda abrir todas las puertas y ventanas que dan hacia el exterior.

ĵ Elegir un lugar afuera donde reunirse a una distancia segura del alquiler.

ĵ Que todos conozcan dónde encontrar un kit de primeros auxilios.

Para más información y recursos sobre seguridad contra incendios, visite

usfa.fema.gov.
Order filed December 22, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00646-CV

____________

ERIC D. BURNS, Appellant

V.

JAMES A. WHITE, ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-DCV-268373

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due December 3, 2020. No brief or motion for 

extension of time has been filed. Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or 

before January 21, 2021, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Poissant.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

 

Thefollowing are direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant:

 
|                                             |   | **State or  Province** |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                                             |   | **of  Incorporation**  |
|                                             |   |                   |
| Arden-Mayfair, Inc.                         |   | Delaware               |
| Mayfair  Realty, Inc.                       |   | Delaware               |
| Gelson’s  Markets                           |   | California             |
| AMG  Holdings, Inc.                         |   |                   |
|   (formerly  Telautograph Corporation) |   | Virginia               |

 

----