alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        30 September 2022    

                    Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Changes Command                 
                 Rear Adm. Bradley Andros, from Poughkeepsie, New York, relieved Rear Adm. Joseph DiGuardo Jr., from Fallston, Maryland, as commander, Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), during a ceremony at Assault Craft Unit 4 onboard Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story. DiGuardo, who            

        29 August 2022    

                    EODTEU Two Holds Change of Command Ceremony                 
                 Explosive Ordnance Disposal Training and Evaluation Unit (EODTEU) 2 welcomed its newest leader during a change of command ceremony at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek- Fort Story, Aug. 25.Cmdr. Paul Mahoney relieved Cmdr. Douglas Alley as commander, EODTEU 2 in front of family, friends            

        14 May 2022    

                    USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. Commissions                 
                CHARLESTON, S.C. -- The Navy commissioned its newest Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Frank E. Petersen, Jr. (DDG 121), May 14 in Charleston, South Carolina.            

        29 January 2021    

                    U.S. Fleet Forces Command Pins New Chiefs                 
                In a ceremony steeped in tradition, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) held a chief petty officer (CPO) pinning ceremony, Jan. 29, 2021, at the USFFC headquarters in Norfolk, Virginia.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Item 11.  Executive Officers of the Registrant

     (a)  The following table indicates, as of September 30, 1998, the names and
          ages of the executive officers of Registrant.  Their term of office
          with Registrant held by such person:

                        Position and
                        Office with     Held Office     Term of
Name            Age     Registrant      Since           Office

Jan Forrest     49      President       July 1998       Next Annual
                                                        Shareholders'
                                                        Meeting

Kendra Jeffries 29      Secretary       February 1997   Next Annual
                                                        Shareholders'
                                                        Meeting

          There are no family relationships among the executives of the
          registrant.

          There is no arrangement or understanding between any executive officer
          and any other person to which he was selected as an officer.

     (b)  The following is a brief account of the business experiences during
          the past five (5) years of each executive officer.

          1.  Jan Forrest has been involved in the real estate business for the
              past five (5) years.  She has been actively involved in property
              management during that period.

          2.  Kendra Jeffries has worked for four (4) years for a real estate
              investment property company, buying and selling real estate for
              the company.
A92A1388.

#### CRAIG v. THE STATE.

(424 SE2d 902)

Decided October 5, 1992

Reconsideration denied October 20, 1992.

*Ronnie K. Batchelor,*for appellant.

*Thomas C. Lawler III, District Attorney, Debra K. Turner, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Johnson, Judge.

James A. Craig appeals from his conviction of child molestation and the denial of his motion for a new trial.

1. In his first enumeration of error, Craig contends that the trial court erroneously charged the jury on the definition of the offense of child molestation. The record reveals that the court asked Craig if he had any objections to the charge as given. Craig stated that he had no objections and he did not reserve the right to make any objections at a later time. “Clearly, it is the law of this state, even in criminal cases, that if the trial court asks if there are any objections to the charge given, counsel for the defendant must either state his objections or reserve the right to make such objections on motion for new trial or on appeal or waive any such objections.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) *Seidel v. State,*197 Ga. App. 14, 15 (2) (397 SE2d 480) (1990). Due to Craig’s failure to object or reserve objections to the charge upon the trial court’s inquiry, such objections were waived and cannot be considered on appeal.

2. Craig’s remaining three enumerations of error are deemed abandoned pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 15 (c) (2) because they are not supported by argument. In his brief, Craig has set forth purported arguments in support of the remaining enumerations. Those arguments, however, are insufficient because they simply rephrase the enumerated errors. “Insofar as the enumerations themselves contain argument, it is conclusory and insufficient to raise justiciable issues.” *Hunter v. State,*201 Ga. App. 9 (2), 10 (410 SE2d 204) (1991).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carley, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.*
#### In the Matter of Sandra Love, Appellant, v Board of Elections of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered August 18, 1989, which validated respondent Colon’s petition for designation as a candidate in the Democratic Party for election to the office of Council Member, 11th Councilmanic District, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the petition invalidated, without costs. Respondent’s cover sheet was defective in that it included in the number of signatures (6,940) some 1,099 signatures or 15.8% which were from outside of the district and thus invalid. (Election Law § 6-134 [9]; *Matter of Catucci v Marchi,*143 AD2d 59, *Iv denied*72 NY2d 914 [1988]; *Hargett v Jefferson,*63 NY2d 696 [1984].) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF THE CEO AND CFO PURSUANT


TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Aperture Health, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Banks, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of the
    Company.







Date:
      October 13, 2008
            By:/s/ Thomas
      Banks
              Thomas
      Banks, Chief Executive
Officer
# CE2010184EN.01018601.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/186 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/186

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Internal market in electricity ***II

P6_TA(2009)0241

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC (14539/2/2008 – C6-0024/2009 – 2007/0195(COD))

2010/C 184 E/47

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council common position (14539/2/2008 – C6-0024/2009),

having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0528),

1

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0216/2009),

| 1. | Approves the common position as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position as amended;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, 18.6.2008, P6_TA(2008)0294.

1

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009P6_TC2-COD(2007)0195

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 22 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/72/EC.)

---
Clear All

        21 March 2024    

                    Bataan ARG, 26th MEU(SOC) Return from 8-month Deployment                 
                More than 4,000 Sailors and Marines assigned to the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and embarked 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) (MEU(SOC)) returned to Hampton Roads following an eight and a half-month deployment to the U.S. 2nd, 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operations,            

        30 March 2023    

                    USS Mesa Verde hosts Family Day for loved ones to learn about their Sailors                 
                NAVAL STATION NORFOLK, Va. –  On March 24, USS Mesa Verde (LPD 19) hosted an open house for its family members with ship tours, good eats, and a live band performing for the crew.Mesa Verde Executive Officer, Cmdr. William Bridges said Family Day was for spouses and children to better appreciate            

        08 February 2023    

                    Blue-Green Dream Team: Integrating Navy and Marine Forces Aboard BATARG for PMINT                 
                Over the course of almost two weeks, the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (BATARG) and 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) successfully integrated with Amphibious Squadron 8 (PHIBRON 8) across the three ships Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5), San Antonio-class amphibious transport            

        01 February 2012    

                    Bataan Amphibious Ready Group Returns from Deployment                 
                Nearly 2,000 Sailors aboard the ships of the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (BATARG) are scheduled to return to their homeports Tuesday, Feb. 7 following a 10 1/2-month deployment supporting operations in the U.S. Navy's 5th and 6th Fleets areas of responsibility            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 4.29

 

Rights and Obligations Assumption Letter

 

This entity, Wuhan Mierdun Education Technology Limited, is the subsidiary established by Hubei Sannew Education Development Limited, which is controlled by BGY Education Investment Management Co., Ltd. (“Investor”) and registered in Wuhan City at the Qiaokou District branch office of the Administration for Market Regulation on May 17, 2019. The Investor holds 80% of the interests in this entity.

 

In accordance with the Exclusive Management Service and Business Cooperation Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into by and between Investor, Zhuhai Hengqin Bright Scholar Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and other relevant parties on January 25, 2017, this entity shall join the Agreement according to Article 10.1 of the Agreement as a “New Subsidiary of Party B” under the Agreement.

 

This entity hereby agrees to join the Agreement as a new Subsidiary of Party B of the Investor, enjoy the rights under the Agreement, and perform the obligations according to the Agreement. This Assumption Letter came into effect upon the date of execution.

 

Wuhan Mierdun Education Technology Limited

(Seal) Wuhan Mierdun Education Technology Limited Affixed

 

	
By:
    	
/s/Jiaqian Tao
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Jiaqian Tao
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Legal Representative
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
December 10, 2019
#### Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.—U.S. Branch v Cologne Reinsurance Company of America.

Motion by defendants-respondents for (1) reargument denied, and (2) leave to appeal to Court of Appeals granted, as indicated; and cross motion by plaintiff-appellant for reargument denied. Concur—Ross, J. P., Asch, Rosenbrger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10366]



[[Page 21005]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Dopaminergic and Basal Ganglia Plasticity in Aging.
    Date: April 25-26, 2001.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel Pasadena, 191 N. Los Robles Pasadena, 
CA 91101.
    Contact Person: Louise L. Hsu, Ph.D, Scientific Review 
Administrator, The Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/
Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Early Events in Alzheimer Pathogenesis.
    Date: May 8-9, 2001.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, Markham & Broadway, Little Rock, AR 
72201.
    Contact Person: Louise L. Hsu, Ph.D, Scientific Review 
Administrator, The Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/
Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10366 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M.
HYNES & HOWES INSURANCE COUNSELORS, INC.
                    Statement of Retained Earnings (Deficit)
              For the Years Ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994


                                              Year Ended September 30,
                                        1996            1995            1994

Balance at Beginning of Year    $ (3,098,392)   $ (3,091,877)   $ (3,104,291)

Income (Loss) for the Year            15,397          (6,515)         12,414

Balance at End of Year          $ (3,082,995)   $ (3,098,392)   $ (3,091,877)








                          Statement of Paid-In Capital
              For the Years Ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994

Balance at Beginning
  and End of Year              $         100    $        100    $        100










Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
----

----

|   | (1)                                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2)                                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Date: April 25, 2011 | By:    | /s/ James Rose          |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                 |   | James Rose              |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9-14 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9-14 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9-14 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9-14 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9-14 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9-14 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 6 of 6
exv4w3



 






Exhibit 4.3




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	n

	 	Ernst & Young LLP

Chartered Accountants

Ernst & Young Tower

222 Bay Street, P.O. Box 251

Toronto, Ontario M5K 1J7
	 	n
	 	Phone: (416) 864-1234

Fax:     (416) 864-1174






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Registration Statement
(Form F-8) (File No. 333-129218), as amended on
December 15, 2005 (the “Amended Registration
Statement”), pertaining
to Inco Limited’s offer to purchase all of the issued and outstanding common
shares of Falconbridge Limited (formerly Noranda Inc.) (the
“Company”) and the incorporation by reference in the Amended Registration
Statement of our auditors’ report dated February 3, 2005 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated
statements of income (loss) and retained earnings (deficit) and cash flows for the years then
ended.




	 	 	 
	 

Toronto, Canada,

	 	/s/   Ernst & Young LLP
	December 15, 2005

	 	Chartered Accountants






A member of Ernst & Young Global
#### Morgan Coal & Oil Corp., Appellant, v Sheldon Solow, Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover moneys owed for goods "sold and delivered” to the defendant, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated June 28, 1988, as denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are disputed issues of fact which preclude an award of summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor *(see, Mortimer v Lynch,*119 AD2d 558). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#                                                                         Medical Inspector General Evaluates Readiness at Naval Medical Forces Atlantic                                                                    

##### by Bobbie A. Camp, Naval Medical Forces Atlantic Public Affairs and Outreach

05 April 2023

Tags:
**Navy medicine**Command Inspection**MEDIG**NMFL**Naval Medical Forces Atlantic
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Eonr RI PI Hellmlth A6si6tad County **AUdifOr** LaLemlan cmlnty Taco, Texas Dear Sirr

ter of February &en **abwe,** In n Involved as fol**6 been**  **f~lell or**  **6 Called**  **t0** the oitr jail to an I.6vheth6r the arrest fee of $2.00

106s of the Co&a afCriminal Proaedure, **fees** to **be allowed**  **peaae** offleer **for servloeo**  rendered, to **be t0xed**  against conYiotion. **We** cplotethe section of the

.l. For executing each warrant Of arrest or capias, orrx&ing arrest rltlmut wirrant, twodollars.' *e thM the practlcoble application ef **this** statute requires that itbe construed in the light at WtiClt36 883 3nd 884 Of the Code OfCri.mlnalF'rfW3dtlre. It ig oholous thefoe prwided Inartiole 1065, 6upra, would be pyablo by thedefendant only up comiction.“,g~ew~;tS.cm a trial nust be held **before** a compo-
, In the justlee oourttherevouldhave tobe a w6qlalnt confor6zLngto the r Wi6iOXl6 Of -tic 

### ale 883, fmpa* Upon the filing of he oomplaint, regardless of the Saot that thedefendant might then be in actual custody, a8arrant met iSsue* Thie ie plainly ~Wided in 8l'tiOle882, 66 fO11Olf6:

'Then the requirewnte of the preoedlmg artiole have been complied vith, the justice shall issue avarrant for the arrest of the aocwed tuxideliver the 6aGc to the paper - officer tobe executed.6 It %6 subniitted,mer the fa4Jt6givf3.I by you, the fee of tvo dollar6 ~wided for in article 1065, mapra, vould bc due and payable to the officer vho makes the proper return upon the varrant 6hom he has 

### ebecuted it.
In this conmotion, ve think It proper to dire& your attention toartiolc 239, Code of Criminal prooednre, reading a6 follovs:

*A prSOn i6 said t0be arIV36teddh3n he haebeonaetually plaoedunder restraint Or taken **into** custody by the @fleer or person 

### executing the **varrant** 

### of arrestr Zlmrk2fore,youarereapeetfully answered,iP the offleer who goes to the city jail am3 fransfer6 the defordant to the county jail, fOllO66 uphis work by executing the8arrant vhen issued, he vould be entitled to the tuodollars, prwided thedefendant ie tried, conViCted; 6& p 6hi6 fiI63alldCOSt6.

L lb3.s in the event the ca6e is tr axlflnallydispoeed of+'Ltthe justice court. The 66s~ reasoning vould apply in the eVent a’C6ph66 16 i6SlV3dfrOn th0 0OlXlt.y '3OlWt. See lu‘tiCle 

### 441, Codeof crindnal procedure. Yerytruly YCJIIP6 ATTORNIZ GE- OF TELLS BT:Av BY APPROFEOt (Sigma) Benjsnin Voodall (SignOa)Gerald C.&am A.WJiStWIt' ATTOMTZ GENEtUL OFTEXAS