alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


This certification is not deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report of Hypercom Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”).


In connection with the Report, we, Philippe Tartavull, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Thomas B. Sabol, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge, respectively, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 9, 2011By: /s/ Philippe TartavullPhilippe TartavullChief Executive Officer and President





Dated: August 9, 2011By: /s/ Thomas B. SabolThomas B. SabolChief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### In re JONES.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

No opinion. Decree reversed, and will admitted to probate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      35,680,872
<SECURITIES>                                43,204,433
<RECEIVABLES>                               61,689,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,719,742
<INVENTORY>                                 59,405,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           220,558,488
<PP&E>                                      34,722,607
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,214,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             261,409,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,574,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,960
<OTHER-SE>                                 220,807,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               261,409,537
<SALES>                                     65,983,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,983,340
<CGS>                                       32,612,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,031,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            77,195,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               355,394
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             181,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,355,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,590,185
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,765,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05306-AKH Document 23 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
Clear All

        13 October 2023    

                    From Daughter to Shipmate                  
                As the Navy celebrates its 248th birthday this year, it allows Naval Air Force Atlantic (AIRLANT) to highlight the Sailors who serve in Naval Aviation.  For the first time in his naval career, AIRLANT’s Force Master Chief Jimmy W. Hailey III, has served on the same coast as his daughter,            

        28 October 2022    

                    USS Gerald R. Ford arrives in Halifax for First International Port Visit                 
                HALIFAX, Nova Scotia - The first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) and embarked crew arrived in Halifax, Nova Scotia, for the ship’s first international port visit, Oct. 28, 2022.            

        11 September 2022    

                    Deployed Truman Strike Group Sailors Become U.S. Citizens                 
                ATLANTIC OCEAN —Petty Officers 3rd Class John Gacad and Francisian Manaog became U.S. citizens during a naturalization ceremony aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), Sep. 9.            

        17 May 2022    

                    SECNAV, CNO visit USS George Washington                 
                NEWPORT NEWS, Va. – Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Carlos Del Toro and Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Mike Gilday traveled to Newport News, Va. today to meet with Sailors assigned to the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73).             

        30 March 2022    

                    Norfolk-based E-2 Hawkeye Crashes, Two Injured, One Fatality                  
                NORFOLK, Va. – A Navy E-2D Hawkeye assigned to an East Coast Airborne Command and Control Squadron (VAW) crashed in the vicinity of Wallops Island and Chincoteague, Va., March 30. One crew member has died and two have been injured.             

        12 May 2021    

                    USS Harry S. Truman Departs Norfolk Naval Shipyard                 
                Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) departed Norfolk Naval Shipyard in Portsmouth, Virginia, May 12, following the conclusion of the first of its kind, Extended Carrier Incremental Availability, conducted there.            

        09 April 2021    

                    U.S. Navy Opens Second COVID-19 Vaccination Site In Hampton Roads                  
                A high through put COVID-19 vaccination site opened onboard Naval Air Station (NAS) Oceana April 9.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karl Brenza, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |  |                                                  |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------ |  | 
| |  | /s/ Karl Brenza                                  |  | 
| |  | Karl Brenza Chief Financial Officer May 10, 2007 |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent, Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT  32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  annual report of Taurus Entertainment Companies, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Alfred Oglesby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  January 14, 2004            By:  /s/  Alfred  Oglesby
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alfred  Oglesby
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer


<PAGE>
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O S. A P - 76, 272 & A P - 76, 273

EX PA R TE JAM ES E D W A R D M O TT , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ONS F OR W RI TS OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N OS . 3 3 0 9 2 CR & 3 3 0 9 3 CR I N T HE 4 0 DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM ELLI S CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial co u rt t ra n s m i tted to this C ourt these a pplications for wr its of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convic ted of burg lary of a ha bitation, sentence d to eig hty y ear s’ imprisonment, and tamper ing w ith evidence , sentenc ed to five y ear s’ imprisonment. Ap pli c ant c on te nd s th a t his c ouns e l r e nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e be c a us e sh e fa ile d to timely file a notice of appe al. T h e tr ia l c o u rt ha s d e te r

mi n e d th a t t

r ia l c o u n s e l f

a il e d to ti me ly f il e a n o ti c e o f a p p e a l. We2

find, there for e, t h at Appl icant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-time appe als of the judgme nt of convictions in Cause Nos. 33092CR and 33093CR from the 40 J udicial District Court

th of Ellis County . Applicant is order ed returned to that time at which he may g ive written notice of
a pp e a l so that he may

the n, wi th t

he a id o f co un se l, obt a in a me anin g fu l app e a l. Al l ti me lim its sh a ll be ca lculated a s if the sentenc e had be en imposed on the d at e on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appe al, he must take aff irmative steps to f ile wr itt e n no tic e of a

pp e a l in the tr ia l c ourt

wi thi n 3 0 d ay s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: J anuar

y 13, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
**EXHIBIT 21**

SUBSIDIARIES OFREGISTRANT

The following are director indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant:
|                                     | ** ** | **State or Province** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | **of Incorporation**       | ** ** |
|                                |       |                            |       |
| Arden-Mayfair, Inc.                 |       | Delaware                        |       |
| Mayfair Realty, Inc.                |       | Delaware                        |       |
| Gelson’s Markets               |       | California                      |       |
| AMG Holdings, Inc.                  |       |                            |       |
| (formerly Telautograph Corporation) |       | Virginia                        |       |

 

----
Clear All

        26 August 2022    

                    Free Uniforms for Pregnant Sailors: Navy Maternity Pilot Program Still Accepting Applications for FY 22                 
                Originally announced in December 2021 with the release of NAVADMIN 284/21, the Navy's Military Pilot Program is a team effort, administratively managed by the Chief of Naval Personnel’s Uniform Matters Office with the support of the Navy Exchange Service Command (NEXCOM) for fulfillment.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05735-RJH-THK Document 5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: May 18, 2001.
    Time of Meeting: 0730-1700, May 18, 2001.
    Place: US Army Night Vision Laboratory 399, Ft. Belvoir 
Virginia.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's (ASB) panel is conduction a 
series of panel discussions and a study on ``Knowledge Based 
Management and Information Reliability'' to exam innovative ways of 
addressing technology issues that have the potential to ``weight 
down'' our future Warfighters with massive amounts of data. These 
meetings will be open to the public. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the 
time and in the manner permitted by the committee. For further 
information, please contact Mr. Randy Woodson, Office of the DA 
DCSINT, 703 604 2462, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#285a49464c51065f47474c5b4746684059404906495a455106454144"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0173606f65782f766e6e65726e6f41697069602f60736c782f6c686d">[email protected]</span></a>.

Wayne Joyner,
Executive Assistant, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 01-11116 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Clear All

        25 January 2024    

                    Medical Forces Atlantic Reserve leadership highlight importance of mission readiness                 
                PORTSMOUTH, Va. - Reserve Component Naval Medical Forces Atlantic (RC NMFL) held a 4-day annual leadership sync for 20 commands within the region that focused on Navy Medicine and Navy Reserve priorities on board Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads-Portsmouth Annex, Jan. 18-21.Nearly 50 Navy            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Flores, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered December 9, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of *705a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred when it closed the courtroom during the testimony of two undercover police officers is without merit. As to one of the officers, defense counsel expressly stated that he had no objection to the closure of the courtroom, and thus failed to preserve the issue for appellate review with respect to that officer *(see, People v. Gonzalez,*135 AD2d 829). As to the second officer, the court conducted a hearing during which it was shown that the undercover officer was still engaged in several pending investigations in Brooklyn at the time of the trial and that closure was necessary to protect his safety and the integrity of his ongoing operations *(see, People v Jones,*47 NY2d 409, *cert denied*444 US 946; *People v Hinton,*31 NY2d 71, *cert denied*410 US 911; *People v Gonzalez, supra).*On this record, we find that the court properly granted the People’s request for closure.

We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive and find it to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-4017

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. John Luther Session, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 1998 Filed: October 16, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BRIGHT, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. A jury found John Luther Session guilty of conspirin g to distribute cocaine base, andof distributing and aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine base on March 7 and 11, 1 997, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)

. Sess ionwithdrew post-trial motions for judgment of acquittal and for mistrial i n exchange for the government & s stipula tion to a three-level acceptance-of-responsibility reduction for sentencing purposes. At sentencing, Session objected to the presentence report & s drug-quantity calculatio n and testified on his own behalf that he had delivered no more than 3 grams of cocaine base on March 1 1 and was not involved in the MarchThe Honorable Donald E. O & Brien, United States District Judge for the Nor thern 1 District of Iowa. -2- 7 transaction. The district court found that ev en without the March 7 amount, Session 1 was responsible for more than 5 grams of cocaine ba se, as the laboratory report, which the court found to be credibl e, stated that the amount delivered on March 11 was 7.61 gram s. Taking into account Session & s prior drug-distribution conviction, the court sentenced him to the statutory minimum of 120 months' imprisonment and 8 years ' supervise d release. Appellate counsel moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v

. Californi a , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Session did not file a pro se supplemental brief.
The only i ssue raised on appeal is whether trial counsel was ineffective fo r failing to con duct any testing or examination of the alleged controlled substance. We conclude that this claim would be more ap propriately addressed in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceed ing, in which a record can be fully developed. See United States v. Mitchell , 136 F.3d 1192, 1193 (8th Cir. 1998). Upon review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 26 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 26 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 26 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 26 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05312-AKH Document 26 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
A92A1042.

#### THOMAS v. JOHNSON et al.

(423 SE2d 306)

Andrews, Judge.

Johnson et al. sued Thomas for damages allegedly sustained in an automobile accident. Thomas filed an answer preserving the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and defective service of process. He moved for summary judgment and dismissal on grounds that the statute of limitation has expired, and he has never been properly served with the action. We granted this interlocutory appeal to review the trial court’s December 9, 1991 order denying Thomas’ motions.

The accident occurred on July 16, 1989, and suit was filed on June 18, 1991. A two-year statute of limitation applies. OCGA § 9-3-33. The return of service form shows that after several failed attempts at personal service, Thomas was served by tacking the summons and complaint to the front door of his residence on July 25, 1991. A subsequent affidavit filed by the process server reflects that he went to Thomas’ residence on several occasions and attempted to locate Thomas. The affidavit does not indicate that the server ever saw or *754spoke to Thomas, or that Thomas was otherwise aware of his presence when service was attempted. Although the process server speculates that Thomas was attempting to avoid service, there are no facts in the record to support such a claim. The affidavit confirms that after several attempts the process server “tacked the summons and complaint on the door.” The record does not reflect that any further efforts were made to serve Thomas.

Decided October 8, 1992.

*A. Cullen Hammond,*for appellant.

*Walker & Associates, Betty B. Walker,*for appellees.

Tacking service to the door of Thomas’ residence was clearly not sufficient to comply with the personal service requirements of OCGA § 9-11-4 (d). *Benton v. Modern Finance &c. Co.,*244 Ga. 533 (261 SE2d 359) (1979). The failure to accomplish personal service in a manner which complies with the statutory scheme requires that the complaint against Thomas be dismissed. *Bible v. Bible,*259 Ga. 418 (383 SE2d 108) (1989). The statute of limitation for this action expired on or about July 16, 1991, and no personal service has been perfected on Thomas. The plaintiff has failed to act diligently to perfect service, and Thomas was entitled to summary judgment in his favor. *Acord v. Maynard,*198 Ga. App. 296 (401 SE2d 315) (1991); *McManus v. Sauerhoefer,*197 Ga. App. 114 (397 SE2d 715) (1990).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Birdsong, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*