alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11385]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Extension: Rule 17a-1; SEC File No. 270-244; OMB Control No. 3235-
0208]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, 
Washington, DC 20549.
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is publishing the following summary of 
collection for public comment.
    Rule 17a-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that 
all national securities exchanges, national securities associations, 
registered clearing agencies, and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking 
Board keep on file for a period of five years, two years in an 
accessible place, all documents which it makes or receives respecting 
its self-regulatory activities, and that such documents be available 
for examination by the Commission. The average number of hours 
necessary for compliance with the requirements of Rule 17a-1 is 50 
hours per year. There are 24 entities required to comply with the rule: 
9 national securities exchanges, 1 national securities association, 13 
registered clearing agencies, and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking 
Board. The total number of hours required for all respondents to comply 
with the rule is thus 1,200 hours annually.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in 
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Direct your written comments to Michael E. Bartell, Associate 
Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 450 5th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549.

    Dated: April 27, 2001.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11385 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 30, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-11229 Filed 5-1-01; 10:59 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
EXHIBIT 18

                           Change in Accounting Principle

January 22, 1999




Board of Directors
Knight-Ridder, Inc.
50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 1200
San Jose, California 95113

Dear Board Members:

Note F of the notes to consolidated financial statements of Knight-Ridder, Inc.
included in its 1998 Form 10-K for the year ended December 27,1998 describes a
change in the method used to determine the market related value of plan assets
from market value to a calculated value. You have advised us that you believe
that the change is to a preferable method in your circumstances because doing so
aligns the method of calculating the return component of net periodic pension
costs with the related plans' investment strategy and it minimizes significant
year-to-year fluctuations in pension cost caused by financial market volatility.

There are no authoritative criteria for determining a 'preferable' method of
calculating the market related value of plan assets based on the particular
circumstances; however, we conclude that the change in the method used to
determine the market related value of plan assets from market value to a
calculated value is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on your
business judgment to make this change for the reasons cited above, is preferable
in your circumstances.



                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
#### *In re*AUTRY, Nicholas James

(MR 21051)

Chicago, IL

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to *679Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Nicholas James Au-try is suspended from the practice of law for 18 months and until further order of the Court.
Clear All

        25 January 2023    

                    USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) sails with Latvian Patrol Boat LV Viesīte (P 07) in the Baltic Sea                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) conducted interoperability exercises with the Latvian Patrol Boat LV Viesīte (P 07) while sailing in the Baltic Sea, Jan. 23, 2023.            

        20 August 2022    

                    Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group and USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) visit Baltic allies                 
                Four U.S. Navy vessels arrived in the Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania for scheduled port visits, Aug. 20.            

        09 July 2022    

                    USS Arleigh Burke arrives in Riga, Latvia                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) arrived in Riga, Latvia for a scheduled port visit on July 9, 2022.            

        17 June 2022    

                    BALTOPS 22, the premier Baltic Sea maritime exercise, concludes in Kiel                 
                KIEL, Germany - Sixteen NATO Allied and partner nations concluded the 51st iteration of Baltic Operations 2022 (BALTOPS22) in Kiel, Germany, June 17, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-01526-AKH Document 5 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01526-AKH Document 5 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
|Exhibit 4


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this
Annual Report on Form 40-F of Hydrogenics Corporation of our Auditors Report and our
Comments by Auditors on Canada - United States Reporting Differences dated February
27, 2004 relating to its consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2003 and its
consolidated statements of operation and deficit and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2003, which appear in this Annual Report on Form
40-F.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPChartered AccountantsToronto,
OntarioMay 19, 2004
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 19

- 00377

- CR

No. 04

- 19

- 00378

- CR

Joshua PIEPER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR2080 and Trial Court No. 2018CR2081

Honorable Jefferson Moore , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 23, 2020.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
Clear All

        26 July 2023    

                    Rooted in Maritime History: Stennis Holds Mast Stepping Ceremony                 
                NEWPORT NEWS, Va. (July 26, 2023) – The crew of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) and members of Newport News Shipbuilding marked a major milestone in the ship’s refueling, complex and overhaul (RCOH) maintenance period with a mast stepping ceremony, July 26.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Clear All

        29 September 2023    

                    USS Paul Ignatius arrives in Stockholm                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) arrived in Stockholm, Sweden September 29, 2023 for a scheduled port visit, to enhance U.S.-Sweden relations and build NATO partner cohesion.            

        01 August 2023    

                    USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) sails with French frigate Languedoc                 
                On July 20, 2023, Capt. Ed Sundberg, Commodore, Task Force 65 and Cmdr. Corry W. Lougee, Commanding Officer, USS Paul Ignatius, visited Languedoc and had lunch with Languedoc’s commanding officer, Captain Laurent Saunois.            

        20 August 2022    

                    Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group and USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) visit Baltic allies                 
                Four U.S. Navy vessels arrived in the Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania for scheduled port visits, Aug. 20.            

        17 June 2022    

                    USS Paul Ignatius arrives in new homeport of Rota, Spain                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) arrived in its new homeport of Naval Station Rota, Spain, as the U.S. Navy’s newest Forward Deployed Naval Forces–Europe (FDNF-E) destroyer, June 17, 2022.            

        28 April 2022    

                    USS Paul Ignatius Departs Florida for Inaugural Patrol, Homeport Shift to Spain                 
                NAVAL STATION MAYPORT, Fla. - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) departed Naval Station Mayport, April 27, for a routine patrol in the U.S. Sixth Fleet area of operations and a homeport shift to Rota, Spain.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# C_2009064EN.01002001.xml

| 19.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/20

---

Update of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 316, 28.12.2007, p. 1; OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 16; OJ C 177, 12.7.2008, p. 9; OJ C 200, 6.8.2008, p. 10; OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 13; OJ C 3, 8.1.2009, p. 10; OJ C 37, 14.2.2009, p. 10)

(2009/C 64/08)

The publication of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security.

SWEDEN

Amendment of the information published in OJ C 316, 28.12.2007

Amendment of the information published in OJ C 316, 28.12.2007

Air borders

New border crossing point (was opened on 1 February 2009):

Pajala-Ylläs Airport (in the municipality of Pajala)

---
# C_2010101EN.01002601.xml

| 20.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/26

---

Corrigendum to the publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 157 of 10 July 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 157 of 10 July 2009

2010/C 101/11

On page 14, under 3.2, third paragraph:

for:

‘The flour colour must be 75 or higher, colour being measured on a scale of 0 to 100 (the lower the L value, the stronger the colour of the flour). “Farine de blé noir de Bretagne” has a strong colour’,

read:

‘The flour colour is not less than 75 but not more than 90, colour being measured on a scale of 0 to 100 (the lower the L (1) value, the stronger the colour of the flour). “Farine de blé noir de Bretagne” has a strong colour compared with other regions of production’.

On page 16, under 5.2, last paragraph:

for:

‘This product forms the basis of the diet of the population in the area since “farine de blé noir de Bretagne” was intended to be eaten in crêpes (thin, generally sweet pancakes) and galettes (thicker, mainly savoury pancakes)’.

read:

‘This product has formed the basis of the diet of the population in the area since “farine de blé noir de Bretagne” was intended to be eaten in crêpes (thin, generally sweet pancakes) and galettes (thicker, mainly savoury pancakes)’;

On page 17, under ‘Reference to publication of the specification’:

for:

‘http://www.inao.gouv.fr/repository/editeur/pdf/IGP2008/cdchFarinedeBleNoirdeBretagnesept2008.pdf’,

read:

‘https://www.inao.gouv.fr/fichier/CDCIGPFarinedeBleNoirdeBretagne.pdf’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-4618]


Eagle Knits of Stanfield Inc., Norwood, NC; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
section 250(a), subchapter D, chapter 2, title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
March 8, 2001, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at 
Eagle Knits of Stanfield, Inc., Norwood, North Carolina.
    The petitioner requested that the petition for NAFTA-TAA be 
withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve 
no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of April, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-11107 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 20-60370 Summary Calendar

Julio Perez-Gomez,

Petitioner ,

versus
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General , Respondent

.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A208 565 856

Before Barksdale, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Julio Perez-Gomez, a native and ci tizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap peals’ (BIA) denying his applications for: asylum; withholding of removal; and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 26, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-60370 Document: 00515996947 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2021No. 20-60370

2 In considering the BIA’s decision (and the IJ’s, to the extent it influenced the BIA), questions of law are reviewed de novo ; factual findings, for substantial evidence. E.g. , Orellana-Monson v. Holder , 685 F.3d 511, 517– 18 (5th Cir. 2012). The IJ denied Perez’ applicatio ns for asylum and withholding of removal, finding he had neither a lleged the Guatemalan government had persecuted him nor demons trated a well-founded fear of persecution based on that government’s unwillingness or inability to control the gangs that Perez claimed to fear. See Tesfamichael v. Gonzales , 469 F.3d 109, 113 (5th Cir. 2006) (explaining that, for asylum, applicant must demonstrate persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution “by the government or forces that a government is unable or unwilling to control” (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) and 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1)); Roy v. Ashcroft , 389 F.3d 132, 138 (5th Cir. 2004) (explaining withho lding of removal is a higher standard than asylum, requiring applicant to demonstrate a clear probability of persecution). The IJ also denied Pere z relief under the CAT, finding he had not demonstrated it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by, or with the acquiescence of, the Guatemalan government. See, e.g. , Chen v. Gonzales , 470 F.3d 1131, 1139 (5th Cir. 2006). The BIA adopted the order of the Immigration Judge (IJ). Perez contends, inter alia : the BIA erred by upholding the IJ’s findings. He did not, however, dispute these findings before the BIA. Perez made no mention of the Guatemalan government’s ability or willingness to control the cited gangs or the government’s participatio n or acquiescence to any torture he may endure if returned to Guatemala. Because he failed to exhaust these claims before the BIA, we lack jurisdiction to review them. See, e.g. , Roy , 389 F.3d at 137. Case: 20-60370 Document: 00515996947 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/26/2021No. 20-60370

3 These unreviewable findings are fatal to Perez’ claims for relief. Accordingly, we need not addres s his remaining contentions.

DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part. Case: 20-60370 Document: 00515996947 Page: 3 Date Filed: 08/26/2021
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 3

- 00 759

- CR

Style: Juan F. Trevino

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : March 5, 2014

Type of motion: Extension of time to file Anders response

Party filing motion: Pro se

Document to be filed: Anders response

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: April 4, 2014

Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: April 4, 2014

Date Requested: June 3, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If docume nt is to be f

iled, document due: June 3, 2014

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, t he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

The Court grants appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his pro se Anders response and orders

appellant’s response to be filed no later than June 3, 2014.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: March 6, 2014
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 47-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 47-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10312 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JIMMY GORDON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 208

- 1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jimmy Gordon appeals his guilty plea conviction for sexual exploitation of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Gordon argues that the conduct described in the factual resume supporting his guilty plea was not sufficient to establish the offense of conviction because it did not refle ct that a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 26, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10312 Document: 00514323454 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/26/2018No. 17

- 10312

2 Because Gordon did not object to the factual sufficiency of the factual resume in the district court, review is for plain error. See United States v. McCall , 83 3 F.3d 560, 562 (5th Cir. 2016); United States v. Trejo , 610 F.3d 308, 313 (5th Cir. 2010). Courts employ a six

- factor test to determine whether an image depicts sexually explicit conduct. See United States v. Steen , 634 F.3d 822, 826 (5th Cir. 2011). A review of those factors in light of the stipulations in the written factual resume, Gordon’s admissions at his rearraignment, and
the record as a whole , see Trejo , 610 F.3d at 313, shows that the district committed no clear or obvious error in finding a sufficient factual basis for Gordon’s gui lty plea. Specifically, the record supports a conclusion that the focal point of the image in question was the child’s uncovered genitalia and that the image was created to be sent to a third party to elicit a sexual response from the viewer. See McCall, 833 F.3d at 563

– 64. Gordon’s argument that the factual resume was insufficient because it did not reflect that the minor actively engaged in the sexually explicit conduct is without merit

. See id. at 563 n.4, 5 64 n. 6

. For the foregoing reasons, t he jud gment is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-10312 Document: 00514323454 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/26/2018