alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER,

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
each of the undersigned officers of AMB Property Corporation,
the sole general partner of AMB Property, L.P. (the
Operating Partnership), hereby certifies, to
such officers knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the quarterly
    period ended June 30, 2003 (the Report)
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.                                                                                                                               

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Operating
Partnership and will be retained by the Operating Partnership
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



| |                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ HAMID R. MOGHADAM                                   
| |                                                         
| | Hamid R. Moghadam                                       
| | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
    Officer   
|
| | /s/ W. BLAKE BAIRD                                      
| |                                                         
| | W. Blake Baird                                          
| | President and Director                                  
|
| | /s/ MICHAEL A. COKE                                     
| |                                                         
| | Michael A. Coke                                         
| | Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
    President

Dated: August 13, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Operating Partnership, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

58
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Percent of
                                                                   Voting
                                                                 Securities
                                      Jurisdiction of             Owned by
Subsidiary                            Incorporation              the Company
----------                            -------------              -----------
<S>                                   <C>                           <C>
Fulton Industries, Inc.               Pennsylvania                  100%

Fulton International Foreign
Sales Corporation                     Barbados                      100%

Fulton International, Inc.            Delaware                      100%

Gradall Industries, Inc.              Delaware                      100%

JLG Industries (Propriety) Limited    South Africa                  100%

JLG Equipment Services, Inc.          Pennsylvania                  100%

JLG Industries, GmbH                  Germany                       100%

JLG Manufacturing, LLC                Pennsylvania                  100%

JLG Premier Limited                   United Kingdom                100%

JLG Properties Australia Limited      Australia                     100%

Litra Handelsgesellschaft, mbH        Germany                       100%

OPR Holdings B.V.                     Netherlands                   100%

The Gradall Company                   Ohio                          100%

The Gradall Orrville Company          Ohio                          100%
</TABLE>

The financial statements of the above listed subsidiaries are included in the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements incorporated herein by reference.
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 44 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of K.M.T., a Child

No. 06-13-00062-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Rusk County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2013-03-

155-CCL). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 18, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

CLEMENTE URENA (and Wife, BELKIS URENA, 07-CV-1540 (AKH)

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

-against80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC ,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel

for Defendants CENTURY 21, INC and BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC in the abovecaptioned action and all future correspondence and papers filed or serviced in connection with

the above-captioned action are to be directed to the undersigned.

Dated: New York, New York

September 11, 2007

Yours etc.,

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

CENTURY 21, INC., BLUE

MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC

/5/

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062)

100 WaIl Street

New York, NY 10005

212 687-0100

212 687-0659 (Fax)

Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 11, 2007, 1 caused the following document

to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

Realty).

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants Century 21, Inc and Blue Millennium

The undersigned further certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plain4ffs

Dated: September 11, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

1 Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

Is!

Stanley Goos

Case 1:07-cv-01540-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-01668-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

ANGEL SERRANO and TANNY SARMIENTO,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-4516-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 29 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 17, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 29 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Image Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,John P. Avagliano, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                Based on myknowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

 

(2)                                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | June 29, 2010 | /s/ JOHN P. AVAGLIANO                               |
|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |               | John P. Avagliano                                   |
|   |               | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                     Page 85

                                      Exhibit 23.1

                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
TODAY'S BANCORP, INC. (formerly known as Northwest Illinois Bancorp, Inc.) on
Form S-8 (File No. 33-21550) of our report dated January 24, 1994, on our audit
of the consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in capital of
TODAY'S BANCORP, INC. (formerly known as Northwest Illinois Bancorp, Inc.) for
the year ended December 31, 1993, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.

                                        /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P

Rockford, Illinois
March 19, 1996
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 28, 2014

d0324

Order 

Clerk

March 28, 2014

148369

MICHIGAN PRODUCTION MACHINING, INC.,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 148369

COA: 312224 

MTT: 00-409641

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#                                                                         USS Gunston Hall (LSD-44) arrives in Harstad, Norway, for Steadfast Defender 2024                                                                     

##### by MC1 Ryan Seelbach

21 February 2024
HARSTAD, Norway - USS Gunston Hall (LSD-44), a Whidbey Island-class dock landing ship arrived in Harstad, Norway, Feb. 21, 2024 for a scheduled port visit during NATO exercise Steadfast Defender 24USS Gunston Hall will later be joined by Italian aircraft carrier Giuseppe Garibaldi and amphibious transport dock San Giorgio. The USS Gunston Hall has embarked French forces onto the ship in Portsmouth, U.K. and will be embarking Finnish and Swedish forces in Harstad to conduct amphibious training exercises in Norway.

Exercise Steadfast Defender will involve approximately 90,000 Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen from across the 31 NATO Allied countries and Sweden participating in Steadfast Defender 2024. Beyond the significant contribution of personnel supporting these operations, we have approximately 50 naval assets and over 80 aircraft assigned to the exercise, all bringing diverse capabilities. Through exercises like Steadfast Defender, the collective aim is to prevent conflict, solidify relationships and enhance force readiness through robust training.

"We are excited to be here in Harstad to begin staging for the upcoming amphibious training events,” said Cmdr. Christopher W. Van Loenen, commanding officer, Gunston Hall. “As our Allies and partners integrate with our ship we will learn from one another and have a tremendous opportunity ahead of us sending allied and partner amphibious crafts from our welldeck to the shores of Norway."

This is the second port call for Gunston Hall following its departure from Naval Station Norfolk, Jan. 24. During Steadfast Defender, Gunston Hall will participate in exercises Joint Warrior and Nordic Response.

Gunston Hall is one of the most versatile amphibious platforms in the U.S. Navy. With two large helicopter landing pads, the largest well deck in the fleet and troop berthing facilities, she has the ability to embark a diverse array of military forces, including NATO Allies and partners when needed. The U.S. ship is among approximately 50 NATO naval assets, 80 air platforms, and 1,100 combat vehicles participating in Steadfast Defender. This year marks the 75th anniversary of the NATO Alliance, and the exercise is the largest NATO exercise in 36 years. 

For over 80 years, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has forged strategic relationships with allies and partners, leveraging a foundation of shared values to preserve security and stability.

Headquartered in Naples, Italy, NAVEUR-NAVAF operates U.S. naval forces in the USEUCOM and USAFRICOM areas of responsibility. U.S. Sixth Fleet is permanently assigned to NAVEUR-NAVAF, and employs maritime forces through the full spectrum of joint and naval operations.

Follow exercise Steadfast Defender: https://www.defense.gov/Spotlights/Steadfast-Defender-24/

Tags:
**USS Gunston Hall**Steadfast Defender 24

Terms:
**Surface Ships**Exercises**Partnerships
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

Five Year Selected Financial Data

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended September 30,
(Millions of dollars, except per                          2000            1999           1998          1997          1996
 share amounts)                                     --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>         <C>            <C>               <C>          <C>
Operations

Revenues                                                $  477      $      464     $      461        $  435        $  422

Cash provided from operations                              316             275            293           269           272

Capital expenditures /(1)/                                 240             265            199           249           210

Pretax income                                              105         58/(2)/        99/(3)/            71            69

Net income                                                  63         35/(2)/        60/(3)/            43            41

Per Share Information

Basic earnings per share                                $ 5.21      $2.49/(2)/     $3.90/(3)/        $ 2.79        $ 2.56

Diluted earnings per share                              $ 5.20      $2.49/(2)/     $3.88/(3)/        $ 2.78        $ 2.56

Dividends declared per share                                 -               -     $     0.64        $ 0.78        $ 0.70

Financial Position

Total assets                                            $1,566      $    1,573     $    1,575        $1,585        $1,537

Total debt                                                 788             852            802           892           892

Total stockholders' equity                                 361             337            408           360           342
</TABLE>


/(1)/ Includes equipment purchased and leased-in under operating leases and
      capital expenditures for acquisitions.

/(2)/ Includes one-time pretax charges of $13 million for restructuring, a $25
      million equipment write-down, and a $1 million unusual item for expenses
      related to the terminated merger. Without these one-time charges, fiscal
      1999 Basic and Diluted earnings per share would have been $4.16.

/(3)/ Includes a $1 million pretax unusual item for expenses related to the
      terminated merger. Without this unusual item, fiscal 1998 Basic and
      Diluted earnings per share would have been $3.93 and $3.91, respectively.

                                                                              25
### The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

March 11, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00158

- CR

Alejandro RODRIGUEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Ap pellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR5834 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. T herefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea

bargain case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)( 2).
This court must dismiss the appeal “ if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State , 182 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

T herefore , we ORDER that this appeal will be dismissed under rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless A ppellant causes an amended trial court certification to be filed within
THIRTY days of the date of this order showing A ppellant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(d)

, 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State

, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.).
All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
(104 So. 517)

#### CHAPMAN v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.

(6 Div. 446.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 28, 1925.)

I. Appeal and error &wkey;>553(2) — Trial *court’s*rulings cannot be presented by incorporating agreed statement of facts in record, but must be presented by bill of exceptions.

The question of waiver of default in payment of premium *note on*insurance policy cannot be presented by incorporating in record proper an agreed statement of facts, but, under Code 1923, §§ 9498, 9502, trial court’s ruling and rendition of judgment can only be presented by bill of exceptions.

2. Exceptions, bill of &wkey;>49 — Agreement of counsel cannot operate as bill of exceptions.

An agreement of counsel cannot operate as a bill of exceptions.

(SntoFor other oases sea same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pickens County; John McKinley, Judge.

Action by Edna Chapman against the Hartford Eire Insurance Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

M. B. Curry, of Carrollton, for appellant.

In view of the decision, it is not necessary that brief of counsel be here set out.

Steiner, Crum & Weil, of Montgomery, and Patton & Patton, of Carrollton, for appellee.

No bill of exceptions appears in the record, and the action of the trial court will not be considered. White v. Roe, 151 Ala. 288, 44 So. 211; Clark v. McCrary, 80 Ala. HO; Williams v. Woodward Iron Co., 106 Ala. 254,17 So. 517; Sou. Exp. Co. v. Black, 54 Ala. 177; Sou. Exp. Co. v. State, 10 Ala. App. 655, 65 So. 844; Code 1923, §§ 9498, 9502.

THOMAS, J.

The pleadings in this suit on a policy of fire insurance were in short by consent, with leave to give in evidence matters which might be specially pleaded. The trial was upon an agreed statement of facts, by the court, without a jury, and judgment was for defendant.

[1, 2] The question of waiver of default in payment of premium note (Insurance Co. v. Williams, 200 Ala. 681, 77 So. 159), or election (Galliher v. State Mutual Life Ins. Co., 150 Ala. 549, 43 So. 833, 124 Am. St. Rep. 83; Rose v. Citizens’ Ins. Co., 210 Ala. 72, 97 So. 81), cannot be presented by incorporating in the record proper the agreed statement of facts. The ruling of the trial court and the' rendition of judgment in favor of defendant can only be presented under the facts to this court by bill of exceptions. Code 1923, §§ 9498, 9502; White v. Roe, 151 Ala. 287, 44 So. 211; Western U. T. Co. v. Garthright, 151 Ala. 413, 44 So. 212; Williams v. Woodward Iron Co., 106 Ala. 254, 17 So. 517; Stephenson v. Allison, 165 Ala. 238, 51 So. 622, 138 Am. St. Rep. 26; Clark v. McCrary, *80*Ala. 110; Southern Express Co. v. Black, 54 Ala. 177. An agreement of counsel cannot operate as a bill of exceptions.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.