alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx Express”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Bronczek,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of FedEx Express.

Date: July 14,2005
| /s/ DAVID  J. BRONCZEK                  |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| David J. Bronczek                       |
| *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Clear All

        22 September 2022    

                    UNITAS Concludes After Successful Exercise                 
                RIO DE JANEIRO - UNITAS LXIII (63), the world’s longest-running multinational maritime exercise concluded with a closing ceremony in Rio De Janeiro, Sept. 22, 2022.            

        09 May 2022    

                    Navy’s unmanned helicopter deploys with radar upgrade aboard USS Milwaukee                 
                The Navy’s upgraded MQ-8C Fire Scout deployed Dec. 14 aboard USS Milwaukee (LCS-5) to support operations in U.S. 4th Fleet area of responsibility.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00488

- CR

David Vernon Dees

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1252463D )

December 27, 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there w as no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>





                                                                      EXHIBIT 23






                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in Federal Express Corporation's previously filed
Form S-8 Registration Statement Nos. 2-74000, 2-95720, 33-20138, 33-38041,
33-55055 and 333-03443 and Form S-3 Registration Statement Nos. 333-49411 and
333-80001 of our reports dated June 29, 1999, included in Federal Express
Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 1999.

                                                      /s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                                      Arthur Andersen LLP


Memphis, Tennessee
August 23, 1999
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05389-AKH Document 27-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH     Document 10      Filed 09/21/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH     Document 10      Filed 09/21/2007     Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2402
DONOVAN R. MURRAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-2589) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donovan R. Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears Estabrook, III, Paula Keyser Speck, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the tax co urt's order upholding the Commissioner's assessment of deficiencies and penalties with respect to his 1990, 1991, and 1993 federal income tax liabilities. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Murray v. Commissioner , Tax Ct. No. 2589-95 (U.S. Tax Ct., June 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-05364-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-195-000]

Take notice than on December 19, 2000, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC (KMIGT) tendered for filing its annual reconciliation filing pursuant to Section 35 (Crediting of Imbalance Revenue) of its General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-B.

KMIGT states that it has served copies of the filing upon all jurisdictional customers, interested State Commission, and other interested parties.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before January 16, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1144  Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### GUNTHER v. GUNTHER.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

June 18, 1894.)

Action by Albert E. Gunther against Emma S. Gunther.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 18 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 18 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01545-AKH Document 18 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### PEOPLE v. KARL et al.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

August 1, 1894.)

Motion by Jacob Karl, principal, and Barney Isaacs, surety, for remission of forfeited recognisance. John R. Fellows, for the People. Edward .M. Bassett, for defendants.

No opinion. Motion •granted.
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**SECTION302 CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Douglas A. Catalano, InterimChief Executive Officer of enherent Corp., certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q of enherent Corp.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

##  

a)             Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)            Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)             All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)            Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| /s/ DOUGLAS A. CATALANO         |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Douglas A. Catalano             |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer |
| November 13, 2003               |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 1 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 2 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 3 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 4 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 5 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 6 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 7 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 8 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 9 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 10 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 11 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 12 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 13 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 14 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 15 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 16 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 17 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 18 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 19 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 20 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 21 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 22 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 23 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 24 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 25 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 26 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 27 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 28 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 29 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 30 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 31 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 32 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 33 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 34 of 35

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 22-9      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 35 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 25-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05311-AKH Document 25-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Anthony Lee McNAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Chiquita R. Bryant, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WILMINGTON, Defendant-Appellee. Anthony L. McNair, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Rocky Mount Police Department; City of Rocky Mount, Defendants-Appellees. Anthony L. McNair, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.C. Hicks; N.B. Newsome; C. Lawance; Robert A. Evan, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 13-1293, 13-1307, 13-1308.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 22, 2013.

Decided: May 2, 2013.

Anthony Lee McNair, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Anthony Lee McNair appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *McNair v. City of Wilmington,*No. 4:12-cv-00276-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013); *McNair v. City of Rocky Mount Police Dep’t,*No. 4:12-cv-00275-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013); *McNair v. Hicks,*No. 4:12-CV-00274-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60867 Conference Calendar

PAUL CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ROY ANDERSON CORP.; R.A. BUILDING CORP., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:95-CV-585-R-R

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paul Clark has appealed the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his tort claims under the Jones Act and General Maritime Law. Clark contends that the district court erred in determining that the spud barge on which the alleged injury occurred was not a “vessel” for purposes of the Jones Act. Clark also contends that the district court erred in determining that it did not haveNo. 96-60867 - 2 - jurisdiction under General Maritime Law to entertain the tort claim. We have carefully reviewed the record and the briefs, and, essentially for reasons stated by the district court, Clark v. Roy Anderson Corp. , No. 1:95-CV-585RR (S.D. Miss. Nov. 12, 1996), we AFFIRM the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Storage  Properties
IV, Ltd. (the  "Partnership") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald
L. Havner,  Jr., as Chief Executive  Officer of Public  Storage,  Inc., and John
Reyes,  as  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Public  Storage,  Inc.,  each  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.

/s/  Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
------------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    March 31, 2006

/s/  John Reyes
------------------------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    March 31, 2006



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 53-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 53-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05309-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 37 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01523-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7