alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 869 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 20
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 869

                          [Report No. 111-30]

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, as the ``Scott Reed Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2009

 Mr. Chandler (for himself and Mr. Rogers of Kentucky) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

                             March 10, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, as the ``Scott Reed Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 101 
Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Scott Reed Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Scott Reed Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 20

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 869

                          [Report No. 111-30]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, as the ``Scott Reed Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 10, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


         In connection with the Annual Report of MedLink International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Rose, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.



      Date: April 16, 2009     By:  /s/ James Rose
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                    James Rose
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                    Financial Officer
Clear All

        15 November 2022    

                    USS Milwaukee, Dominican Republic Navy Work Together in Bilateral Maritime Interdiction Exercise                 
                CARIBBEAN SEA - The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Milwaukee (LCS 5) and two Dominican Republic Navy ships conducted a bilateral maritime interdiction exercise off the coast of Santo Domingo, Nov. 10.            

        30 October 2022    

                    USNS Comfort Commences Continuing Promise 2022 in Guatemala                 
                PUERTO BARRIOS, Guatemala – Hospital ship USNS Comfort (T-AH 20) anchored off the coast of Puerto Barrios, Guatemala, in support of U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command/U.S. 4th Fleet’s Continuing Promise 2022 (CP22) mission, Oct. 26.            

        30 September 2022    

                    U.S. and Brazil Navy Conduct Bilateral Exercise                 
                ATLANTIC OCEAN - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Lassen (DDG 82) and Brazilian frigate BNS União (F45) conducted a 5-day maritime exercise September 23-28 that took place off the coast of Rio de Janeiro.            

        22 September 2022    

                    UNITAS Concludes After Successful Exercise                 
                RIO DE JANEIRO - UNITAS LXIII (63), the world’s longest-running multinational maritime exercise concluded with a closing ceremony in Rio De Janeiro, Sept. 22, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 14 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05349-AKH Document 14 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        23 February 2024    

                    The Invisible Hand Helping Communities Heal: The Sailors Behind Navy Mortuary Services                 
                ROTA, Spain - Being the one left behind after a death is not easy. One moment, everything seems normal; and the next, you realize life will never be the same. During that emotional and stressful time, the Sailors of Navy Mortuary Services step in to lighten the burden.“Someone’s got to,” said Senior            

        03 May 2023    

                    “So Others May Live:” Rota Sailor performs life-saving care to local man                 
                Petty Officer 2nd Class Eleodoro Perez, a Naval Aircrewman assigned to Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 79, was driving home when he saw a commotion on the side of the road, April 1, 2023. He quickly pulled over his car and approached the group.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. O’CONNOR.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

November 17, 1913.)

No. 3841.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Mexico. Action by Charles O’Connor, an infant, by Belle C. O’Connor, his mother and next friend, against the Atchison, Topeka *&*Santa Fe Railway Company. Judgment (197 Fed. 224) for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

Gardiner Lathrop, of Chicago, Ill. (Robert Dunlap, of Chicago, Ill., and H. L. Waldo and R. E. TwitcEell, both of East Las Vegas, N. M., on the brief); for plaintiff in error.

Francis E. Wood, of Albuquerque, N. M. (Marrón & Wood, of Albuquerque, N. M., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before HOOK and'CARLAND, Circuit Judges, and VAN VALKENBURGH, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover damages for. the death of Charles O’Connor, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the railway company. The only error assigned and argued is the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury at the close of all the evidence to return a verdict for the defendant: First, because plaintiff failed to prove that the engine and cars were moved down the track without signal or warning by ringing of the bell; second, because the evidence showed that deceased was aware of the dangers and had voluntarily encountered the risk of injury; third, because the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence in unnecessarily putting himself in a place of peril when there was a safer course open to him. We have carefully read the evidence certified to this court and are of the unanimous opinion that there was testimony sufficient to require each of the above matters to be submitted to the jury. They were so submitted by the trial court in a very careful charge, which covered all the issues and to which no exception was taken. There being testimony for the jury to consider and which was sufficient to support their verdict, we have no authority to interfere. A detailed discussion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose. The judgment will be affirmed; and it is so ordered.
Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05296-AKH Document 12 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 4.27

 

 

Rights and Obligations Assumption Letter

 

This entity, Hubei Sannew Education Development Limited, is the subsidiary of BGY Education Investment Management Co., Ltd. (“Investor”) registered in Wuhan City at Development Zone branch office of the Administration for Market Regulation on February 16, 2015. The Investor holds 80% of the interests in this entity.

 

In accordance with the Exclusive Management Service and Business Cooperation Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into by and between Investor, Zhuhai Hengqin Bright Scholar Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and other relevant parties on January 25, 2017, this entity shall join the Agreement according to Article 10.1 of the Agreement as a “New Subsidiary of Party B” under the Agreement.

 

This entity hereby agrees to join the Agreement as a new Subsidiary of Party B of the Investor, enjoy the rights under the Agreement, and perform the obligations according to the Agreement. This Assumption Letter came into effect upon the date of execution.

 

Hubei Sannew Education Development Limited

(Seal) Hubei Sannew Education Development Limited Affixed

 

	
By:
    	
/s/Jinsheng Cheng
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Jinsheng Cheng
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Legal Representative
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
December 15, 2019
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Carlos Santiago, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered June 13, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of public consumption of alcohol in violation of Administrative Code of City of NY ยง 10-125, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered June 13, 2015, reversed, on the law, and the accusatory instrument dismissed. </p><p>As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his <i>Boykin </i>rights (<i>Boykin v Alabama</i>, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; <i>see People v Tyrell</i>, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (<i>cf. People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375, n 1 [2015]). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: September 21, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 36 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 36 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
|   | (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /S/ Andrew E. Robinson  |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Andrew E. Robinson      |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                    |   |
|   |   | June 20, 2011           |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
- - - - - - - -

NO. 22-0592 IN THE INTEREST OF A.H., A MINOR CHILD § § § § § § Dallas County, 5th District.

October 21, 2022 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.  I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 29th day of November, 2022.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
Case 1:07-cv-04415-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04415-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04415-AKH Document 11 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### Palma Silano, Respondent, v Carmine Silano, Appellant.

In a custody proceeding, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Deutsch, J.), dated May 15, 1987, which, *inter alia,*granted the petitioner mother’s motion to transfer custody of the parties’ two infant children to her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Family Court’s determination which transferred physical custody of the parties’ two infant children to their mother for reasons stated by Judge Deutsch of the Family Court in his memorandum decision.

On oral argument, counsel for the parties informed this court that an application is now pending before Judge Deutsch of the Family Court in which the father challenges, *inter alia,*the mother’s ability to accept physical custody of the children in light of her current living arrangements. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to an application in the Family Court by the father to stay the transfer of the physical custody of the children to the mother pending the determination of Judge Deutsch upon the current application before him. The order of this court dated June 17, 1987, staying the order appealed from shall be continued for five days pursuant to CPLR 5519 (e), within which time the father may, if he be so advised, apply for a stay before the Family Court. Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of approved Amendment to a Tribal-State Compact.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs (Management), Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Amendment between the Yankton Sioux Tribe and the State of South Dakota, which was executed on March 5, 2001.                    

# DATES:

This action is effective May 4, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

Dated: May 1, 2001.

James H. McDivitt,

Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs (Management).

[FR Doc. 01-11419 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
# C_2009177EN.01002001.xml

| 30.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/20

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 174 of 28 July 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 174 of 28 July 2009

2009/C 177/08

On page 1, ‘Reference number of State Aid’:

for:

‘NN 71/09’,

read:

‘NN 71/08’.

---
#### EARL BATES *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17414.

*David B. Rozwaski,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

Decided April 21, 2005

The petitioner Earl Bates’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 777 (AC 23821), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the habeas court’s denial of the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### Vincent Affenita, Respondent, v Long Industries, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Alfred Affenita, Respondent, v Long Industries, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.) Vara Enterprises, Ltd., Respondent, v Long Industries, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 3.)

In three actions based on three confessions of judgment, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), dated January 14, 1987, which denied their motion to vacate the confessions of judgment on the ground of fraud.

*728Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A defendant debtor who seeks to attack the validity of a judgment by confession on the ground of fraud must proceed by plenary action *(see, City of Poughkeepsie v Albano,*122 AD2d 14; *Mittman v Mittman,*33 AD2d 573; *Mall Commercial Corp. v Chrisa Rest.,*85 Misc 2d 613; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 3218.09, at 32-376). Accordingly, the Supreme Court, Nassau County, properly denied the defendants’ motion to vacate the confessions of judgment. Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04412-AKH Document 9 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 20 of 20
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Theodore Hixon, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the suppression court erred in failing to suppress testimony concerning voice identification. There was no reasonable possibility that the challenged voice identification contributed to defendant’s conviction, and thus any error in its admission was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Adams,*53 NY2d 241; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — murder, second degree, and another charge.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.