alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 619 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the exclusion 

from medical assistance under the Medicaid Program of items and services for patients in an institution for mental diseases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2009 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove 

the exclusion from medical assistance under the Medicaid 

Program of items and services for patients in an institution for mental diseases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 619 IH

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF MEDICAID EXCLUSION FROM 

2 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE OF ITEMS AND SERV3 ICES FURNISHED TO PATIENTS IN AN INSTI4 TUTION FOR MENTAL DISEASES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

6 1905(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)) 

7 is amended, in the matter following paragraph (28)— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘such term does not include— 

9 ’’ and ‘‘(A) any’’ and inserting ‘‘such term does not 

10 include any’’; 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a period; 

12 and 

13 (3) by striking subparagraph (B). 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT MED15 ICAL ASSISTANCE FOR IMD PATIENTS UNDER 65 YEARS

16 OF AGE.—The following provisions of such Act are each 

17 amended by striking ‘‘65 years of age or older’’ each place 

18 it appears: 

19 (1) Paragraphs (20) and (21) of section 

20 1902(a) (42 U.S.C. 1396b(a)). 

21 (2) Section 1905(a)(14) (42 U.S.C. 

22 1396d(a)(14)). 

23 (3) Section 1919(d)(7)(B)(i)(I) (42 U.S.C. 

24 1396r(d)(7)(B)(i)(I)). 

25 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

26 this section shall take effect on October 1, 2009, and shall 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 619 IH

1 apply to items and services furnished on or after such 

2 date. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of United Tennessee
Bankshares, Inc. I, Richard G. Harwood, President and Chief Executive Officer of
United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     2.   The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     3.   The  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.

Date: May 10, 2004                                /s/ Richard G. Harwood
     ------------------                           ------------------------------
                                                  Richard G. Harwood
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 23 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 23 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
# CE2010046EN.01012301.xml

| 24.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 46/123 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 46/123

---

Framework for Community action to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides ***II

P6_TA(2009)0010

P6_TA(2009)0010

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 January 2009 on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides (6124/2008 – C6-0323/2008 – 2006/0132(COD))

(2010/C 46 E/25)

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Council common position (6124/2008 – C6-0323/2008) (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council common position (6124/2008 – C6-0323/2008) (1),

1

| — | having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0373), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0373),

2

| — | having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

| — | having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0443/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0443/2008),

| 1. | Approves the common position as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position as amended;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 254 E, 7.10.2008, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 263 E, 16.10.2008, p. 157.

2

---

P6_TC2-COD(2006)0132

Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 13 January 2009 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position ati second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive ...)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                 5
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       210
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            23,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      17
<OTHER-SE>                             (167,672)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              23,978
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,704
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        13,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (11,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (11,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (11,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (6.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (6.47)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, M.G. MILLER

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOHN F. SLOAN

LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400134

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 20 December 2013.

Military Judge: Col H.D. Russell, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 1st Marine 

Regiment, 1st Marine Division (Rein), Camp Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Maj V.G. Laratta, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Maj Michael D. Berry, USMC.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

29 July 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10205 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

LATASHA MARIE ROBERSON ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:05

- CR

- 47

- 2

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent LaTasha Marie
Roberson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Roberson h a s not filed a resp onse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10205 Document: 00512871326 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2014No. 14

- 10205

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdra w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-10205 Document: 00512871326 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2014
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of W. R.
Grace & Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul J. Norris
------------------
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer

Date: November 13, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2566-010; Project No. 11616-000]

a. Date and Time of Meeting: January 31, 2001, 10 am EST.

b. FERC Contact: Tom Dean at (202) 219-2778; thomas.dean@ferc.fed.us.

c. Purpose of the Teleconference: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service intend to discuss the resource agency's recommendations that were not recommended for adoption in the Portland Municipal Hydroelectric Project No. 11616-000 and the Webber Hydroelectric Project No. 2566-010 draft environmental assessment issued on September 19, 2000.

d. Proposed Agenda:

A. Introduction

Recognition of Participants

Teleconference Procedures and Objectives

B. Section 10(j) issues discussion

C. Issues outside of Section 10(j)

D. Summary of meeting

E. Follow-up actions

e. Anyone wishing to participate in the teleconference should call toll free, 1-888-399-8606. The caller will need to give the operator the passcode “Dean”, and the team leader name “Thomas Dean”, to join the teleconference.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1140  Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-04358-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 16 of 16
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD K. CANNON, a/k/a RICHARD CANNON and MERYL 

CANNON,

Petitioners,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN 

INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS 

TRUSTEE AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK, 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR WAMU MORTGAGE 

PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HY5 TRUST,

Respondent.

No. 4D15-436

[June 10, 2015]

Petition for writ of prohibition to Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard Harrison, Senior Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 502010CA023036XXXXMB.

Richard R. Widell of Golant and Golant, P.A., Boca Raton, for 

petitioners.

Jan Timothy Williams of Lapin & Leightling, LLP, Coral Gables, for 

respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition seeking disqualification of the trial 

judge is denied.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., and GERBER, J., concur. 

WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.

WARNER, J., dissenting.

I would grant the writ. Even though the motion and affidavit were 

based upon hearsay, the petitioners filed the required affidavits 

establishing the facts and circumstances as well as their fear of bias. Their 

attorney filed the required certificate of good faith. Thus, the motion was 
2

technically sufficient. See Barnett v. Barnett, 727 So. 2d 311, 312 n.2 (Fla. 

2d DCA 1999) (“Under the current rule, the motion need only be sworn to 

by the party signing it. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin 2.160(c) [now 2.330]. There 

is no requirement that the party have personal knowledge of the facts 

alleged nor that the motion be accompanied by sworn affidavits of persons 

with such knowledge.”). I also think the facts alleged were legally sufficient 

to require disqualification. The level of animosity between the judge and 

the petitioners’ lawyer based upon the facts in the motion, which are not 

merely based upon adverse rulings, is sufficient to create an objectively 

reasonable fear by petitioners that the judge is so biased against their 

attorney as to require his disqualification. See Hayslip v. Douglas, 400 So. 

2d 553, 556-57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

The judge may not pass on the truth of the facts alleged in an initial 

motion for disqualification. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(f). Therefore, 

the judge should have entered an order of disqualification. If the facts in 

the motion are false, then the “laws prohibiting perjury in judicial 

proceedings and rules regulating the conduct of attorneys are adequate to 

control any envisioned abuse.” Layne v. Grossman, 430 So. 2d 525, 526

(Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Clear All

        01 August 2023    

                    Submarines Visit the World’s Busiest Cruise Port                 
                CAPE CANAVERAL, Fl. - Earlier this year, Port Canaveral edged passed Miami as the busiest commercial cruise port in the world, hosting more than 4 million passengers in a single year with nearly a dozen cruise ships claiming Port Canaveral as their homeport.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
trmk-ex101_6.htm



Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

WHEREAS, Trustmark Corporation, a Mississippi corporation (the “Company”), and Gerard R. Host (the “Executive”), have entered into an employment agreement dated September 14, 2010, and effective as of January 1, 2011, and previously amended effective as of February 15, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, section 11.3 of the Employment Agreement provides that it may be amended by a written instrument signed by the parties; 

 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement to provide that Executive shall continue to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as Chief Executive Officer of Trustmark National Bank (the “Bank”) through December 31, 2020;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of December 10, 2019, subject to the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.The Employment Agreement is amended to replace “age 65” with “age 66” in the first sentence of Section 5.9 (“Retirement”). 

 

2.Effective as of January 1, 2020, Executive shall no longer serve as President of the Bank.

 

3.Executive waives any claim that the change in Executive’s status, title or position contemplated by this amendment constitutes Good Reason (as defined in Section 5.6 (“Good Reason”)) for him to terminate his employment.

 

4.Except as amended above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

The Company and the Executive agree to this amendment this 10th day of December, 2019.

 

 


			
	
Executive
	
 
	
Trustmark Corporation

	
 

/s/ Gerard R. Host
	
 
	
/s/ Adolphus B. Baker

	
Gerard R. Host
	
 
	
Adolphus B. Baker

	
 
	
 
	
Chairman, Human Resources Committee
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23

                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'
                       CONSENT OF ERNST AND YOUNG LLP




<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23

                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2004,
included in the 2003 Annual Report to Shareholders of Graybar Electric
Company, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Graybar
Electric Company, Inc. listed in Item 15(a). This schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young

St. Louis, Missouri
March 3, 2004
# CE2010184EN.01018101.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/181 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/181

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009European Network for the Protection of Public Figures *

P6_TA(2009)0228

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the initiative by the Kingdom of the Netherlands for adoption of a Council decision amending Decision 2002/956/JHA setting up a European Network for the Protection of Public Figures (16437/2008 – C6-0029/2009 – 2009/0801(CNS))

2010/C 184 E/42

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the initiative by the Kingdom of the Netherlands (16437/2008),

having regard to Article 30(1)(a) and (c) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty,

having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0029/2009),

having regard to Rules 93 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0193/2009),

| 1. | Approves the initiative by the Kingdom of the Netherlands; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the initiative by the Kingdom of the Netherlands;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Calls on the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the initiative by the Kingdom of the Netherlands substantially; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Calls on the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the initiative by the Kingdom of the Netherlands substantially;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

---