alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#                                                                         Navy Updates Sexual Assault Rules – What You Should Know                                                                    

##### by  MC1 Mark D. Faram, Chief of Naval Personnel Public Affairs

12 July 2022
The Navy released updates to the service's Sexual Assault Prevention and Response policy and adult sexual assault investigation procedures in NAVADMIN 151/22 on July 12.

The update expands the ability of victims to file restricted sexual assault reports and updates procedures for expedited transfers for Sailors filing unrestricted reports.  

Effective immediately, sexual assault victims retain the right to file restricted reports even if they've already disclosed the assault to their commander or personnel in their chain of command.

The restricted report option is only available if the victim has not reported the assault to law enforcement, including military criminal investigative organizations (MCIO) such as the Naval Criminal Investigative Service.

The option is also not available to those who have elected to make an unrestricted report and have signed a DD Form 2910 in the presence of a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator (SARC) or SAPR Victim Advocate (VA) for the same incident.

Even with this change, commanders must still immediately report sex-related offenses within their chain of command to their requisite MCIO responsible for investigating such incidents. This includes notifying MCIOs of sexual assaults regardless of whether they occurred in their chain of command.

Also, this change doesn't eliminate the requirement for military law involvement and criminal investigative organizations to investigate all reports and allegations of adult sexual assault. However, victims retain the right to not participate in the investigation.

Commands must explain these reporting requirements to each victim and ensure they understand these duties don't impact their ability to file restricted or unrestricted reports.

The NAVADMIN also updated procedures for Sailors who file unrestricted sexual assault reports and request an expedited transfer. The new rules now give that member's commander five days to review, approve or disapprove these requests, up from the previously required three days.

Complete details and contact points are available in the NAVADMIN.

For more news from the Chief of Naval Personnel, follow us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/mynavyhr, Twitter at https://twitter.com/mynavyhr, or visit https://www.navy.mil/cnp.

Tags:
**SAPR**Sexual Assault Prevention and Response**Policy

Terms:
**CNP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       456,828
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,682,432
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       13,741,910
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         13,923,435
<LOANS>                                      25,375,161
<ALLOWANCE>                                  46,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               47,345,740
<DEPOSITS>                                   34,918,681
<SHORT-TERM>                                 900,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          115,073
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,985,408
<COMMON>                                     3,703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,422,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               47,345,740
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,039,395
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            434,852
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             90,314
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,564,561
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           854,615
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,020,047
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        544,514
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                5,887
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              504,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              152,044
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   100,344
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 100,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.1
<LOANS-NON>                                   30,718
<LOANS-PAST>                                  17,600
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             188,869
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                148,021
<RECOVERIES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            46,735
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         5,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      41,735
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 49 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 49 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 49 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 49 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 49 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 49 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 49 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 49 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 8 of 8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0562

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT EARL STAUDENMAYER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 23, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 20 2021

07/20/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0562
H. R. 837 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building located at 799 United Nations Plaza in New 

York, New York, as the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown United States Mission to the United 

Nations Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building located at 799 United Nations Plaza in 

New York, New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ronald 

H. Brown United States Mission to the United Nations Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred 

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ronald 

H. Brown United States Mission to the United Nations Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8No. 333-118158, 333-118156, 033-79996, 333-39574,333-43389, 33-9559) pertaining to the Axsys Technologies, Inc.401(k) Retirement Plan and Trust of our report dated February 8,2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofAxsys Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2004.
|                         | /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Hartford, Connecticut   |                            |
| February 23,  2005 |                            |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,078
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,078
<PP&E>                                         7,384,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,959,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,901,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,666,870
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       988,793
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,246,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,901,694
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,888
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,879,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             33,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,908,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,908,475)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,908,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### Ellen Marks, Appellant, v Barrow Marks, Respondent.

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated July 22, 1987, as, in effect, granted the defendant husband’s motion to modify his pendente lite visitation rights with the parties’ children to include certain overnight visitation.

*743Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

In view of the serious and conflicting allegations of the parties, it was error for the trial court not to hear the testimony of all proposed witnesses with respect to the question of custody and visitation prior to resolving the issue of overnight visitation *(see, Mosesku v Mosesku,*108 AD2d 795). Moreover, the trial court should have made specific findings of fact prior to issuing its order *(see, Mosesku v Mosesku, supra).*We note that our determination is not intended to and should not influence the trial court’s final decision with respect to custody and visitation after the completion of the trial on those issues. Lawrence, J. P., Weinstein, Hooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 27-3 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 24 of 24
<PAGE>

CONTACT:  Ray Rogers                         (NYSE - BMC)
          (612) 851-6030                     FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

               BMC ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER EARNINGS WILL BE
                      SHORT OF ANALYSTS' EXPECTATIONS

November 19, 1997 - Minneapolis, MN -- BMC announced today that the Company
expects its earnings to fall short of analysts' expectations for the fourth
quarter.  After reassessing sales prospects and investments required for key
strategic initiatives during the quarter, the Company expects earnings per share
for the fourth quarter in the range of 22 to 26 cents as opposed to the 54 to 55
cents currently estimated by securities analysts.

In summarizing the changes to the Company's anticipated fourth quarter financial
performance, Paul Burke, Chief Executive Officer, stated:  "While the fourth
quarter performance has been impacted by market factors, a significant portion
of the change from prior estimates is attributable to a conscious decision on
our part to invest for BMC's future.  We continue to believe BMC has excellent
businesses with very attractive long-term growth opportunities.  We have always
characterized 1997 as a transitional year and expect significant improvement in
our earnings performance in 1998."

The Company noted that expected sales shortfalls were principally in the area of
television masks where, despite the addition of a new TV mask production line in
its Cortland, New York facility, the Company expects sales to be lower for the
quarter.  Moreover, Invar TV mask sales, where the Company enjoys higher
margins, are expected to fall significantly short of the prior year.  The
Company indicated, however, that it believes the TV sales slowdown to be a
temporary situation produced by a number of independent factors.  The Company
reiterated its strong belief in the growth prospects for the TV mask business.

Adding to the Company's shortfall was the decision to make significant
incremental investments in new high resolution part qualifications, startup of
the Hungarian high resolution inspection facility, new lens product development
and new polycarbonate product promotions.  Quarterly results will also be
affected by price pressures on monitor masks and the weakening yen versus the
dollar, which may be partially offset by an accelerated mix migration to higher
margin and larger Invar monitor masks.

                                      -more-
<PAGE>

Statements made in this press release which are not historical, including
statements regarding fourth quarter 1997 performance, are forward looking
statements and as such are subject to a number of risks.  These and other risks
and uncertainties are detailed in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996.

BMC Industries, Inc is one of the world's largest manufacturers of aperture
masks for color picture tubes used in television and computer monitors.  The
Company is also a leading producer of polycarbonate, glass and plastic eyewear
lenses.  BMC's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol "BMC."

                                        -30-
-59-

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of JLG Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James H. Woodward,
Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ James H. Woodward, Jr.
----------------------------
James H. Woodward, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
September 30, 2002
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        18 July 2022    

                    French, Italian ships join Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group                 
                The French Navy Aquitaine-class FREMM frigate FS Languedoc (D 654) and Italian Navy Carlo Bergamini-class FREMM frigate ITS Alpino (F 594) joined the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) and the Harry S. Truman carrier strike group (HSTCSG) in the Mediterranean Sea in July            

        02 June 2021    

                    Truman Presented 2020 Battenberg Cup Award, Recognized as Best Ship in the Atlantic Fleet                 
                The crew of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) received the 2020 Battenberg Cup Award in a ceremony aboard the ship, June 1, 2021.            

        12 May 2021    

                    USS Harry S. Truman Departs Norfolk Naval Shipyard                 
                Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) departed Norfolk Naval Shipyard in Portsmouth, Virginia, May 12, following the conclusion of the first of its kind, Extended Carrier Incremental Availability, conducted there.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of sanofi-aventis (No. 333-165418, No. 333-157685, No. 333-149203, No. 333-145074, No. 333-139555, No. 333-125490, No. 333-121584,
No. 333-121583 and No. 333-107238) and the Registration Statement on Form F-3 of sanofi-aventis (No. 333-165472) of our reports dated February 25, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 20-F.

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France

February 28, 2011

PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit



|                |  |              
|--------------- |  | -------------
|Xavier Cauchois |  | Philippe Vogt
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 12

                            CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<Table>
<Caption>
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)                           2007        2006       2005       2004       2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>        <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
Interest expense (1)..........................  $ 2,534    $ 2,307     $ 4,192    $ 8,467    $13,067
Interest factor in rental expense.............    8,906      4,898       5,673      6,871      7,196
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Fixed charges, as defined.................  $11,440    $ 7,205     $ 9,865    $15,338    $20,263
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
   before income taxes and minority interest..  $70,576    $41,975     $40,127    $21,031    $29,443
Fixed charges.................................   11,440      7,205       9,865     15,338     20,263
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Earnings, as defined......................  $82,016    $49,180     $49,992    $36,369    $49,706
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (b / a)      7.2x       6.8x        5.1x       2.4x       2.5x
=====================================================================================================
</Table>

(1)   Includes amortization of finance costs.

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing earnings by fixed
charges. "Earnings" consist of earnings from continuing operations before income
taxes and minority interest plus income from an equity method investee plus
fixed charges. "Fixed Charges" consist of interest expense plus one-third of
rental expense (which amount is considered representative of the interest factor
in rental expense).