alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Annual
Report - 10KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         180,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  321,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (67,300)
<INVENTORY>                                    189,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               644,700
<PP&E>                                       1,334,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               (913,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,603,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,431,800
<BONDS>                                        370,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,580,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,603,000
<SALES>                                     10,958,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,017,100
<CGS>                                        6,107,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,478,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               286,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             650,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,398,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,398,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,398,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT INTEREST RECOVERY, INC., and ) WILLIAM CRESCENZO; ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2879 ) PAT FRANK, AS CLERK OF ) COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH ) JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ) HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; ) SHEILA M. HENSLEY; JORGE L. ) DE LA BARRA; et. al., ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed March 23, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laurel M. Lee, Judge. Ann M. Allison of Allison Law Group, Tampa, for Appellants. David M. Caldevilla and Donald C.P. Greiwe of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa; and Dale K. Bohner, General Counsel for the Clerk, Tampa, for Appellee Pat Frank, Clerk of the Court. No appearance for remaining Appellees.- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

CONSTANCE RAMOS , Appellant,

v.

SALVATORE DECARO , Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2803

[ November 10, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Karen M. Miller , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2020

- GA

- 000057

- XXXX

- NB

.

Emre Yersel and Martin G. McCarthy of McCarthy & Yersel , PLLC, Miami, for appellant.

Grace Mackey Streicher and Andrew A. Harris of Harris Appeals , P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , C.J., M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22074-22075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11029]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)


Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Claims Processing Task Force, 
Notice of Establishment

    As required by Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, U.S.C. (App. 1) 9(c), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
hereby gives notice of the establishment of the VA Claims Processing 
Task Force. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs has determined that 
establishing this Task Force is in the public interest.
    The Task Force will critique the Veterans Benefits Administration's 
(VBA) organization and management with a primary focus on the 
compensation and pension processes. The Task Force will evaluate the 
procedures and processes for deciding veterans' appeals of VBA rating 
decisions. The Task Force will also assess various issues and develop 
findings that are aimed at improving VA's ability to process veterans' 
claims for disability compensation and pension.
    The Task Force will report to the Secretary recommendations that VA 
can take to increase productivity, reduce claims processing times, and 
shrink the disability claims backlog without compromising either the 
accuracy of decisions or service to the Nation's veterans.
    The Task Force will consist of ten (10) to eleven (11) members and 
a Chairperson. Selection criteria for Task Force membership will be 
based on expertise in areas such as organizational assessment, 
functional analysis, evaluation of existing practices, and improving 
operational processes. VA will give attention to equitable geographic 
distribution and to ethnic and gender representation when appointing 
Task Force members.

[[Page 22075]]

    The Designated Federal Officer for the Task Force is John R. 
O'Hara. His phone number is (202) 273-5130.

    Dated: April 27, 2001.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Robert W. Schultz,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-11029 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-U
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1858
PATRICIA LEE GREENWAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JACK DYE; A. H. SKARDON; T. T. THOMPSON, Defendants - Appellees. and IVAN J. TONEY; KIM R. VARNER; JAMES W. SEGURA; JANE DOE; LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER; NELA LAUGHRIDGE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:05-cv-01736-GRA) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 18, 2006 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia Lee Greenway, Appellant Pro Se. Debra J. Gammons, CITY OF GREENVILLE, Greenville, South Carolina; Marshall Winn, WYCHE, BURGESS, FREEMAN & PARHAM, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; David W. Hartman, CLARKSON, WALSH, RHENEY & TERRELL, PA, Greenville, South- 2 - Carolina; Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Patricia Lee Greenway appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Greenway that failure to file timely specific objections to the recommendation could waive appellate reviewof a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Greenway failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Greenway has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.- 3 - We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 27, 2019

a1120

Order 

Clerk

November 27, 2019

156647

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156647

COA: 332089 

Wayne CC: 15-005091-FC

CLARENCE McMILLEN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of July 6, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Urban (Docket No. 156458). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

July 31, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00428

- CV
ALMA INVESTMENTS, IN C.

v. BAHIA MAR CO

- OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2006

- 07

- 3289

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS , having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision cer tified below for observance. June 16, 2016
Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 38 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 38 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 38 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                            939,050
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,925,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                      676,570
<INVENTORY>                                     3,074,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                8,226,195
<PP&E>                                          9,373,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,245,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,388,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,502,051
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         63,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,388,443
<SALES>                                         7,250,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,250,954
<CGS>                                           2,055,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,723,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                494,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,009,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,009,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XI and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                        4,928,000
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   129,000             
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                        2,282,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (157,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                7,199,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    7,162,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  7,199,000
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,289,000 <F1>
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,106,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              120,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,028,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1,028,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,028,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     34.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     34.12
<FN>
<F1>Revenues include gain on sale of properties of $502,000.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40833 Summary Calendar

TRACY B. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOANN DAVIS; KRISTEN L. LORMAN;
FRANCES ALMENDAREZ; DAVE METTING, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-98-CV-107

February 22, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tracy Brian Brown, Texas pri soner # 656394, appeals the

dismissal of his suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e )(2)(B)(i).

Brown contends that the magistrate judge erroneously construed his

conspiracy complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), rather than

§ 1985(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that the magistrate judge

impermissibly considered the merits of his retaliation claim.

We have reviewed the record and Brown’s brief and AFFIRM the

magistrate judge’s dismissal. Brown’s claim that the defendants2

con spired to submit an altered government record and a perjured

affidavit in a federal habeas corpus proceeding fails to state a

c laim under § 1985(2). S ee Nealy v. Hamilton

, 837 F.2d 210, 212

(5th Cir. 1988); Babb v. Dorman

, 33 F.3d 472, 476 (5th Cir. 1994).

To the extent that Brown presents his conspiracy claim pursuant to

§ 1983, his bald allegations based upon his own personal belief are

insufficient to s tate a § 1983 claim. S ee Babb

, 33 F.3d at 476.

In addition, Brown’s conclusional allegations of retaliatory

conduct are insufficient to state a cognizable claim under § 1983.

See Whittington v. Lynaugh , 842 F.2d 818, 821 (5th Cir. 1988).

Brown’s motion to supplement his brief is DENIED.

AFFIRMED. MOTION DENIED.
Consent of Independent Accountants



We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 033-62201) of Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc. of our report
dated July 31, 1998  appearing on page 25 of the Annual  Report to  Shareholders
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1. We also consent to
the  incorporation  by  reference  of our  report  on the  Financial  Statements
Schedules, which appears on page 25 of this Form 10-K/A-1.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

    Rochester, New York
    September 22, 1998
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

BOGUSLAW KWASNIAK (and wife, MALGORZATA 07-CV-5300 (AKH)

KWASNIAK),

NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY

Plaintiffs, 100 CHURCH LLC OF

AMENDED ANSWER TO

-against- MASTER COMPLAINT

100 CHURCH LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant 100 CHURCH LLC (hereinafter 100

Church), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption

(Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action,

herein adopt 100 Churchs Amended Answer to Master Complaint dated August 30, 2007, which

was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation,

21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, 100 Church demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action

as against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: New York, New York

September 7, 2007

HARRIS BEACH ILLC

Attorneys for Defendant

100 CHURCH LLC

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 687-0100

Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Oroner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintjff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Deftndants

All Other Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the following

document to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of 100 Church LLCs Adoption of Amended Answer to Master

Complaint.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq. James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

115 Broadway, 12th Floor Patton Boggs LLP

New York, New York 10006 One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. Thomas Egan, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

New York, New York 10279 One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintfs

Dated: September 10, 2007

is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          387,881
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        1,261,486
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                      0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       14,449,187
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         14,761,606
<LOANS>                                      26,031,454
<ALLOWANCE>                                     188,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               46,670,398
<DEPOSITS>                                   34,092,232
<SHORT-TERM>                                    400,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             261,568
<LONG-TERM>                                   6,032,363
<COMMON>                                          3,703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    5,380,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               46,670,398
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 523,349
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               187,009
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 61,189
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                771,547
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              425,317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              491,623
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           279,924
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                    0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 232,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  87,901
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       58,001
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     58,001
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     2.23
<LOANS-NON>                                      39,238
<LOANS-PAST>                                          0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0 
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                188,869
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                         0
<RECOVERIES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               188,869
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              5,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         183,869
        

</TABLE>