alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30989 Summary Calendar

LUTHER T. OTIS, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE; LESLYE A. BASS; ALBERT A. LAVILLE; RON E. GARDNER; and MERVIN L. TRAIL, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-3795-T

-------------------- February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Luther Otis appeals the district court’s decision to deny him appointed counsel with respect to the Title VII allegations he has raised against the defendants. We review such decisions for abuse of discretion. Jackson v. Dallas Police Dept. , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5 th Cir. 1986). Otis’ scant brief does not refer to particular faults by the district court that might constitute an abuse of discretion. Indeed, it is impossible to discern from the brief any specific legal argument, rather Otis simply2

disagrees in conclusory fashion with the district court’s decision. Thus, the court is of the opinion that Otis’ general and conclusory brief is not sufficiently specific to present issues for review. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5 th Cir. 1993). In any event, we have reviewed the district court’s order, as well as the record, and it is evident that the district court considered the proper factors in determining whether appointment of counsel was warranted. The only cases that Otis cites - Robins v. Maggio , 750 F.2d 405 (5 th Cir. 1985) and Carter v. Fenner , 136 F.3d 1000 (5 th Cir. 1998) - in no way conflict with the manner in which the district court resolved Otis’ request for appointed counsel. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
(8 Misc. Rep. 514.)

#### RAWLINGS v. ALEXANDER.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

May 18, 1894.)

Pleading—Answer—Triable Issue.

An answer in an action for goods sold which admits that defendant-purchased the goods, but “denies each and every other allegation in said-complaint contained, not hereinbefore specifically admitted, controverted or denied,” creates a triable issue, and it is error to direct a verdict for-plaintiff.

Appeal from trial term.

*749Action by Howard Rawlings against Sanfelici Alexander. A judgment was entered on a verdict directed in favor of plaintiff, • and defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and VAN WYCK, J.

C. A. Watson, for appellant.

Hayes & Greenbaum, for respondent.

EHRLICH, C. J.

The action is to recover for goods sold and delivered by the firm of James Saitta’s Son *&*Co. to the defendant. The plaintiff claims under an assignment executed by that firm. The answer admits that the defendant purchased from said firm certain goods and merchandise, and, for further answer, “denies each and every other allegation in said complaint contained, not hereinbefore specifically admitted, controverted, or denied.” Plaintiff’s counsel moved for judgment on the pleadings, and the court granted the motion, and directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, which is now the subject of review.

The reason for granting plaintiff’s motion was that the answer was not in the form authorized by the Code. But the court of appeals, in Griffin v. Railroad Co., 101 N. Y. 349, 4 N. E. 740, has held that such a denial is good, and creates a triable issue. Following this case, it is clear that the defendant, by his answer, put in issue the value or agreed price of the goods, together with the fact whether the assignment. under which the plaintiff claims was ever executed as alleged. The direction to find for the plaintiff was clearly unauthorized, and the judgment entered on such direction must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to' the appellant to abide the event.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 804 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to require the expansion, intensification, and coordination of research and other activities of the National 

Institutes of Health with respect to primary lateral sclerosis. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2009 

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to require the 

expansion, intensification, and coordination of research 

and other activities of the National Institutes of Health 

with respect to primary lateral sclerosis. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Understanding and 

5 Research of PLS Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 804 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRIMARY LATERAL SCLEROSIS. 

2 Part B of title IV of the Public Health Service Act 

3 (42 U.S.C. 284 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 409J. PRIMARY LATERAL SCLEROSIS. 

6 ‘‘(a) EXPANSION, INTENSIFICATION, AND COORDINA7 TION OF ACTIVITIES.—The Director of NIH shall expand, 

8 intensify, and coordinate research and other activities of 

9 the National Institutes of Health with respect to primary 

10 lateral sclerosis. 

11 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For the 

12 purpose of carrying out subsection (a), there is authorized 

13 to be appropriated $2,000,000 for the period of fiscal 

14 years 2010 through 2014. Such authorization of appro15 priations shall be in addition to the authorization of appro16 priations in section 402A and any other authorization of 

17 appropriations available for such purpose.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gary Trent Ringo Sr., * From the 142nd District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR39444.

Vs. No. 11-14-00092-CR * September 17, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel for Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 
92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel for Geosciences (1756).
    Date/Time: May 21-24, 2001; 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Place: Room 515 Stafford-II, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Ms. Jewel Prendeville, Staff Associate for 
Diversity and Education, Office of the Assistant Director, Room 705, 
National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8500.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate GeoDiversity proposals as part of 
the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-11290 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD01-01-056] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a temporary deviation from the drawbridge regulations which govern the operation of the Atlantic Beach Bridge, at mile 0.4, across the Reynolds Channel in New York. This deviation from the regulations allows the bridge owner to need not open the bridge for the passage of vessel traffic from 8 a.m., on May 15, 2001 through 8 a.m., on May 17, 2001. This action is necessary to facilitate necessary maintenance at the bridge. Vessels that can pass under the bridge without an opening may do so at all times. 

# DATES:

This deviation is effective from May 15, 2001 through May 17, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joe Schmied, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7165. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Atlantic Beach Bridge, mile 0.4, across the Reynolds Channel has a vertical clearance of 25 feet at mean high water, and 30 feet at mean low water in the closed position. The existing operating regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.799(e). 

The bridge owner, the Nassau County Bridge Authority, requested a temporary deviation from the operating regulations to facilitate replacement of the power operating controls at the bridge. 

This deviation to the operating regulations will allow the owner of the Atlantic Beach Bridge to need not open the bridge for the passage of vessel traffic from 8 a.m., on May 15, 2001 through 8 a.m., on May 17, 2001. Vessels that can pass under the bridge without an opening may do so at all times. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible. This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: April 19, 2001.

G.N. Naccara,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 01-10969 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                 392
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       19,704
<ALLOWANCES>                         8,435
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0
<PP&E>                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      16,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0
<BONDS>                              9,937
<COMMON>                               166
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              1
<OTHER-SE>                           4,608 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        16,991
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     2,877
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        1,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      (153)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   1,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (758)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (758)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        202
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                          (556)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.03)
        

</TABLE>
| 1.   | This                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  February                6, 2008 | /s/David                E. Fountain    |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                              | David                E. Fountain       |
|                                              | Chief                Financial Officer |
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

Image Entertainment, Inc.

Chatsworth, California

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Form S-3 No. 333-138701 and No. 333-121912,Registration Statement on Form S-4 No. 333-128535 and RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 No. 333-160427, 333-119187, No. 333-69623,No. 33-65121 and No. 33-59353 of Image Entertainment, Inc. ofour report dated July 29, 2010, relating to the consolidated financialstatements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A AmendmentNo.1.

 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

(Formerly known as BDO Seidman, LLP)

 

Los Angeles, California

July 29, 2010

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 30      Filed 05/09/2008     Page 1 of 1
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 663 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, as 

the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 663 EH

1 SECTION 1. YVONNE INGRAM-EPHRAIM POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, 

5 Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Yvonne 

6 Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram11 Ephraim Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 663 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postim Post Office Building’’. Sparta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram-Ephra- al Service located at 12877 Broad Street in
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ProQuest Company (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 3, 2004 hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    KEVIN G. GREGORY                                                                 
|Kevin G. Gregory, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary



March
18, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to [Issuer] and will be retained by
[Issuer] and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.



104
Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,558-01

EX PARTE JOHNATHAN WESLEY BRUCE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 25,141-A IN THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM POLK COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. According to

the record, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on February 21, 2020, but the transcript of the

hearing was not forwarded to this Court. Under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure, a reporter is required to transcribe a hearing within fifteen days of its conclusion and then

to immediately forward the transcript to the district clerk in the county of conviction. Id. at § 3(d). 

After receiving the transcript, the district clerk is required to forward it, among other things, to this

Court. Id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4).

The district clerk shall serve the reporter in Applicant’s case with a copy of this order and
2

then either forward to this Court the transcript of the evidentiary hearing or certify in writing that the

reporter has not transcribed the hearing. The district clerk shall comply with this order within thirty

days from the date of this order.

Filed: September 16, 2020

Do not publish
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 07-16

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

O R D E R

Pursuant to Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules) and

Miscellaneous Order No. 01-05, the Court created a Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline

(Standing Panel) to consider disciplinary cases coming before the Court. The Court's March 11,

2011, Resolution regarding the Standing Panel furtherspecifies the terms for the composition of the

Standing Panel. 

In anticipation of several judges becoming ineligible for service on the Standing Panel due

to retirement or service as chief judge, and to ensure continuity in the composition of the Standing

Panel, the Board of Judges has decided, by exception to the terms of the March 2011 Resolution, to

constitute the membership of the Standing Panel as ordered below.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective August 1, 2016, the Standing Panel consists of Judges Schoelen,

Pietsch, and Greenberg.

DATED: September 20, 2016 FOR THE COURT:

/s/Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems 
(1190).
    Date/Time: May 17-18, 2001; 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 360, 
Arlington, VA
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Persons: Drs. Chaun F. Chen & Thomas W. Chapman, Program 
Directors, Division of Chemical & Transport Systems, NSF, 4201 
Wilson Blvd. Room 525, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8371.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the FY 2001 Major 
Research Instrumentation (MRI) Panel of proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-11289 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M