alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Sanofi, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
March 6, 2018



By:

/s/ Olivier BrandicourtOlivier BrandicourtChief Executive Officer (1)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanofi and will be
retained by Sanofi and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|(1) | Principal executive officer.
|--- | ----------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-62657) pertaining to the Ceres Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan of our report
dated March 4, 2003, except for Notes A, F and O as to which the date is March
31, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Ceres Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.




Cleveland, Ohio
March 31, 2003
II 

Calendar No. 65 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 663 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 20, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, as 

the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. YVONNE INGRAM-EPHRAIM POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, 

7 Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Yvonne 

8 Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 663 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram5 Ephraim Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 65 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 663 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postim Post Office Building’’. Sparta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Yvonne Ingram-Ephra- al Service located at 12877 Broad Street in 

MAY 20, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          17,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  259,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,835
<INVENTORY>                                    295,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,262
<PP&E>                                         697,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                 377,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,119,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          435,250
<BONDS>                                        256,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                     346,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,119,836
<SALES>                                      2,289,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,310,480
<CGS>                                        2,105,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,105,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,377
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,446)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GARY CECIL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-55004

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-02137-GPCNLS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Gary Cecil, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process and

access-to-court claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Cecil failed to address any of the grounds for dismissal,

FILED

DEC 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
and has therefore waived his appeal of the district court’s order. See Indep. Towers

of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not

consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”);

Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by

argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).

AFFIRMED.

2 16-55004
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6457 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6457

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
   distributions from individual retirement plans during periods of 
                 unemployment in 2009, 2010, and 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2010

Mr. McDermott introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
   distributions from individual retirement plans during periods of 
                 unemployment in 2009, 2010, and 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETIREMENT PLAN DISTRIBUTIONS WHILE UNEMPLOYED DURING 2009, 
              2010, AND 2011 EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 
gross income shall not include any qualified unemployment distribution.
    (b) Qualified Unemployment Distribution.--
            (1) In general.--For purposes of this section, the term 
        ``qualified unemployment distribution'' means any distribution 
        from a qualified retirement plan (as defined in section 4974(c) 
        of such Code) after separation from employment, if--
                    (A) such individual has received unemployment 
                compensation for 12 consecutive weeks under any Federal 
                or State unemployment compensation law by reason of 
                such separation,
                    (B) such distributions are made during any taxable 
                year during which such unemployment compensation is 
                paid or the succeeding taxable year, and
                    (C) such distribution is made after December 31, 
                2008, and before January 1, 2012.
            (2) Distributions after reemployment.--Paragraph (1) shall 
        not apply to any distribution made after the individual has 
        been employed for at least 60 days after the separation from 
        employment to which paragraph (1) applies.
            (3) Self-employed individuals.--To the extent provided in 
        regulations by the Secretary of the Treasury, a self-employed 
        individual shall be treated as meeting the requirements of 
        paragraph (1) if, under Federal or State law, the individual 
        would have received unemployment compensation but for the fact 
        the individual was self-employed.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply to distributions made 
after December 31, 2008, in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 59 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 59 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 59 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
|   | (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /S/ Andrew Robinson     |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Andrew E. Robinson      |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                    |   |
|   |   | March 30, 2011          |   |
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                        Consent of DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-48021, No. 33-52700, No. 33-80172, No. 33-84022, No. 33-71080, No. 33-80170,
No. 333-3125 and No. 333-31027 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No.
333-3123 on Form S-3 of Metatec Corporation of our reports dated February 11,
1998, included and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Metatec Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
March 30, 1998
Columbus, Ohio
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                4,773
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       279,973
<ALLOWANCES>                         10,447
<INVENTORY>                         104,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    391,478
<PP&E>                              468,505
<DEPRECIATION>                      310,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      970,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               390,353
<BONDS>                             506,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 24
<OTHER-SE>                           (2,758)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        970,524
<SALES>                             963,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    963,273
<CGS>                               598,064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       875,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     25,019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   19,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      42,701
<INCOME-TAX>                         23,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  18,452
<DISCONTINUED>                         (464)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         17,988
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.75


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RAIT Financial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel G. Cohen                
|Daniel G. Cohen                    
|Chief Executive Officer and Trustee
|Date: August 6, 2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2016

No. 04

- 14

- 00331

- CV

Gene DEVOLL
, Appe llant

v.

Rebecca DEMONBREUN and William Dowds,

Appellees
From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 05169 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 16, 2015, we abated this appeal based on Norris DeVoll’s petition for bankruptcy filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas under case number 15

- 50122

- CAG

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1. Although Norris DeVoll is neither an appellant nor appellee in this appeal, his community property interest in Paulette DeVoll’s partnership interest

— which is the subject of this appeal

— was property that may have been part of the bank

ruptcy estate. See 11 U.S.C. § 541 (2006) (“Property of the estate”).
In our January 16, 2015 order, we suspended this appeal and all time periods under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from the date the bankruptcy petition was filed in the bankru ptcy court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2. We advised the parties the appeal would remain suspended unless and until it was reinstated in accordance with Rule 8.3. See id. R. 8.3(a). On June 20, 2016, appellant Gene DeVoll filed a motion to reinstate the appe al and attached a certified copy of the bankruptcy court’s April 26, 2015 Discharge of Debtor order in case number 15

- 50122

- CAG

. See id. The order states that Norris J. DeVoll “is granted a discharge under section 727 of title 11, United States Code.” A ppellant’s motion to reinstate also includes a copy of the final judgment in adversary case number 15

- 05025

- CAG. That judgment lists William Dowds and Rebecca Demonbreun, appellees in this appeal, as plaintiffs in case number 15

- 05025

- CAG.We REINSTATE th is appeal on this court’s docket. We WITHDRAW the previous

submission date of November 12, 2014 . W e set this appeal for submission on briefs only on Wednesday, August 3, 2016 before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Marion, Justice Alvarez, and Justice Chapa. No supplemental briefing is required.

It is so ORDERED on July 13, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_______ ____________________________

Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Park Service (NPS) has prepared a Director's Order setting forth its policies and procedures governing the management and implementation of youth programs throughout the National Park Service. When adopted, the policies and procedures will apply to all units of the national park system. 

# Dates:

Written comments will be accepted until June 5, 2001. 

# Addresses:

                        Draft Director's Order #26 is available on the internet at                         *http://www.nps.gov/​refdesk/​Dorders/​index.htm*. Requests for copies and written comments should be sent to William H. Jones, NPS Youth Programs Division Manager, Department of the Interior, 1849 C St. RM# 7325 NW., Washington, DC 20010.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William H. Jones at (202) 565-1079. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The NPS is updating its current system of internal written instructions. When these documents contain new policy or procedural requirements that may affect parties outside the NPS, they are first made available for public review and comment before being adopted. The draft order Director's Order covers topics such as the management and supervision of the Youth Conservation Corps, the Public Land Corps, Job Corps and other programs that introduce youth to employment opportunities and conservation projects in the National Park Service. 

Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from the administrative record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold from the record a respondent's identity, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. 

Dated: April 20, 2001. 

William H. Jones, 

Program Manager, Youth Programs Division. 

[FR Doc. 01-11131 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-U
# Index of Worksheets

# Fires & Losses Trends 2004-2013

# Fires by Gen Property Type 2013

# Res Bldg Fire & Loss '04-'13

# Nonres Bldg Fire & Loss '04-'13

# Vehicle Fire & Loss '04-'13

# Out-Other Fire & Loss '04-'13

# Res Bldg Fire Causes 2013

# Nonres Bldg Fire Causes 2013

# Vehicle Fire Causes 2013

# Outside Fire Causes 2013

# Other Fire Causes 2013

# Sheet12
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jose Samuel Sanchez

, * From the 106th District Court

of Dawson County,

Trial Court No. 17

- 7724

.

Vs. No. 11

- 18

- 00 295

- C R * October 22 , 20 20

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 15-15

IN RE: COURT CLOSURE ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 24, 2015, AND THURSDAY, DECEMBER 31,

2015.

O R D E R

By direction of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will

be closed on Thursday, December 24, 2015, and Thursday, December 31, 2015.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and

Procedure, Thursday, December 24, 2015, and Thursday, December 31, 2015, will be considered

days when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: November 5, 2015 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
#### THE ELIZABETH.

(District Court, N. D. California, First Division.

October 21, 1913.)

No. 15,452.

Maritime Liens (§ 65*)—Suit to Enforce Lien for Repairs—Set-Off.

That one making repairs on a vessel estimated that it would take “about a week” does not amount to a contract to complete the work within that time, which entitles the owner to a set-off as damages in a suit to enforce a lien for the repairs, because they were not finished within that time.

[Ed. Note.—For other eases, see Maritime Liens, Cent. Dig. § 103; Dec. Dig. § 65.*]

In Admiralty. Suit by the Christie Machine Works against the tug Elizabeth.

Decree for libelant.

*141McGowan & Westlake, o£ San Francisco, Cal., for libelant.

R. F. Mogan, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to Sate, & Rep’r Indexes

DOOLING, District Judge.

This is a libel for repairs to the tug Elizabeth; the repairs amounting in value to $515.20. The amount and value of the work is not disputed by claimant, but a set-off of $200 is claimed as damages, because the work was not 'done within the stipulated time.

It is well settled that damages may be recovered for failure to finish a structure, or repairs thereon, within the time agreed; but the evidence here shows no such agreement to perform the work within.a_ stipulated time as would render the libelant liable for damages for failure so to do. The most that can be said of the testimony in favor of claimant is that it shows that libelant’s manager estimated that it would “take him about a week” to perform the work required; but there is nowhere any testimony that he agreed to perform the work within that time, and he himself testified positively that he did not. Such being the state of the evidence, libelant is entitled to a judgment for the full amount sued for.

Ret a decree be entered for the sum of $515.20 and costs.