alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1



NEWPORT CORPORATION



Subsidiary List



|                                                                      |  |               
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Company Name                                                          |  | Jurisdiction  
|Domestic Subsidiaries:                                                |  |               
|Automation Unlimited, Inc. (indirect; inactive)                       |  | Massachusetts 
|Design Technology Corporation (inactive)                              |  | Massachusetts 
|GKS Inspection Services, Inc.                                         |  | Michigan      
|Kensington Laboratories, Inc.                                         |  | California    
|Newport Domestic International Sales Corporation (inactive)           |  | California    
|Newport European Distribution Company                                 |  | California    
|Newport Finance Company I, LLC                                        |  | Delaware      
|Newport Finance Company II, LLC                                       |  | Delaware      
|Newport Government Systems, Inc. (inactive)                           |  | California    
|Micro Robotics Systems, Inc.                                          |  | Delaware      
|Newport Precision Optics Corporation                                  |  | New York      
|Unique Equipment Co.(d/b/a Newport Advanced Automation Systems Group) |  | Arizona       
|Foreign Subsidiaries:                                                 |  |               
|Micro Controle Finance Holding 1 (indirect)                           |  | France        
|Micro Controle Finance Holding 2 (indirect)                           |  | France        
|Micro-Controle Holdings Ltd. (inactive)                               |  | United Kingdom
|Micro-Controle Italia S.r.l.                                          |  | Italy         
|Micro-Controle Ltd. (indirect; inactive)                              |  | United Kingdom
|Micro-Controle S.A.                                                   |  | France        
|Micro-Controle UK Ltd. (indirect; inactive)                           |  | United Kingdom
|MRSI Asia Pte. Ltd. (indirect)                                        |  | Singapore     
|MRSI (Europe), B.V. (indirect)                                        |  | Netherlands   
|Newport B.V.                                                          |  | Netherlands   
|Newport Corporation (Barbados) SRL                                    |  | Barbados      
|Newport GmbH                                                          |  | Germany       
|Newport Instruments AG (inactive)                                     |  | Switzerland   
|Newport Instruments Canada Corporation                                |  | Canada        
|Newport Ltd.                                                          |  | United Kingdom
|Newport Opto-Electronics Technologies (indirect)                      |  | China         
|NPT Instruments AB (indirect)                                         |  | Sweden
#### Carmen Martinez et al., Respondents, v Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, Ernest Lieber and Morris Rabinowitz appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), dated May 16, 1984, as, upon a jury verdict, and upon a stipulation reducing the amount of that verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff Carmen Martinez and against them in the principal sum of $125,000, and in favor of the plaintiff Arthur Martinez and against them in the principal sum of $25,000. By order dated July 14, 1986, this court reversed the judgment insofar as appealed from, and dismissed the complaint insofar as it was asserted against the appellants *(Martinez v Long Is. Jewish Hillside Med. Center,*122 AD2d 122). By order dated June 9, 1987, the Court of Appeals reversed the order of this court, and remitted the case here for consideration of the facts and those issues not reached upon the appeal to this court *(Martinez v Long Is. Jewish Hillside Med. Center,*70 NY2d 697).

*265Justice Mangano has been substituted for the late Justice Gibbons *(see,*22 NYCRR 670.2 [c]).

Ordered that upon remittitur, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the trial was sufficient to permit the jury to infer that the plaintiff Carmen Martinez had a firmly held belief that abortion was immoral. The evidence also establishes that the appellants, by their negligence, induced Ms. Martinez to undergo an abortion, and thus commit an act which was contrary to her firmly held belief. We therefore conclude that, as a matter of fact, the plaintiffs sufficiently proved their cause of action, as that cause of action was defined by the Court of Appeals in its decision in this case. We have examined the appellants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Finally, we agree with the trial court that the jury’s verdict as to damages was excessive, and therefore, we decline to reinstate it *(see,*CPLR 5501 [a] [5]). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
21

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Neil  Christiansen,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




Date:  November  12,  2002                    /s/ Neil  Christiansen
                                              ----------------------
                                              Chief  Financial  Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NATHAN RILEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 372 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 51 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05724-PAC     Document 5      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05724-PAC     Document 5      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05724-PAC     Document 5      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
 Company
 1.
    
    The accompanying Amendment to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F/A for the period
ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Makita CorporationBy:
    /s/ Masahiko GotoName:
    
    Masahiko GotoTitle:
    
    President and Representative Director  Makita CorporationBy:
    /s/ Kenichiro NakaiName:
    
    Kenichiro NakaiTitle:
    
    Director, General Manager of Administration Headquarters
Clear All

        03 May 2023    

                    From War Bears to Mules: Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 60 Detachment 2 Provides Back-to-Back Critical Support to EUCOM, NATO Maritime Group 2                 
                Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 60 Detachment 2 (HSM-60.2), spent the majority of 2022 deployed supporting near back-to-back operations embarked aboard Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98) and USS Donald Cook (DDG 75).The “Jaguars” of HSM-60, based out            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  | USFF FOIA | DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF APPLICA INCORPORATED


The following companies are direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of
Applica Incorporated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


         Name of Subsidiary                                   Jurisdiction of Incorporation
         ------------------                                   -----------------------------
<S>      <C>                                                  <C>
1.       WD Delaware, Inc.                                    Delaware
2.       Eclat Investments Ltd.                               Cayman Islands
3.       Windmere Holdings Corporation                        Delaware
4.       HP Intellectual Corp.                                Delaware
5.       Applica Consumer Products, Inc.                      Florida
6.       Sandgate Services Limited                            Hong Kong
7.       HP Delaware, Inc.                                    Delaware
8.       PPC Industries Ltd.                                  British Virgin Islands
9.       Windmere SPC LLC                                     Cayman Islands
10.      Bay Books & Tapes, Inc.                              Florida
11.      Household Products Chile Comercial Limitada          Chile
12.      Applica de Colombia Limitada                         Colombia
13.      HPG de Venezuela                                     Venezuela
14.      HP (BVI) Limited                                     British Virgin Islands
15.      HP Americas, Inc.                                    Delaware
16.      Household Products (Asia) Limited                    Hong Kong
17.      Applica Denmark ApS                                  Denmark
18.      Remdale Investments Limited                          British Virgin Islands
19.      Durable Electric Limited                             Hong Kong
20.      Durable Electrical Metal Factory Limited             Hong Kong
21.      Applica Asia Limited                                 Hong Kong
22.      Maanring Holding B.V.                                Netherlands
23.      Tofino Investment Limited                            British Virgin Islands
24.      Applica Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V.            Mexico
25.      Applica de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.                Mexico
26.      Applica Canada Corporation                           Nova Scotia
27.      Windmere Durable (Asia) Limited                      Hong Kong
28.      Novotek Limited                                      Hong Kong
29.      Redcliffe Import and Export Limited                  Hong Kong
30.      Parawind Limited                                     Hong Kong
31.      Delanee Limited                                      Hong Kong
32.      Windmere (Shenzhen) Limited                          Hong Kong
33.      HPG LLC                                              Delaware
</TABLE>


The following company is 50% owned by Applica Incorporated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>      <C>                                                  <C>
34.      Anasazi Partners, L.P.                               Massachusetts

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The C2 Database Ops Panel Meeting will meet at Gunter Air Force 
Base (AFB), AL on May 9, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and discuss the 
direction of the study.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b(c) of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) 
and (4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10880 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
# C_2009197EN.01000301.xml

| 21.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/3

---

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2004/108/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility and repealing Directive 89/336/EEC

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under this Directive)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under this Directive)

2009/C 197/03

The date of cessation of presumption of conformity for ‘EN 55022:1998 Information technology equipment — Radio disturbance characteristics — Limits and methods of measurement (CISPR 22:1997 (Modified))’ and its amendments ‘A1:2000 to EN 55022:1998 (CISPR 22:1997/A1:2000)’ and ‘A2:2003 to EN 55022:1998 (CISPR 22:1997/A2:2002)’ which was set out in the Commission communication published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 126 of 5 June 2009, is postponed until 1 October 2011.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH Document 19 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH Document 19 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 2 of 2
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40526 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Luis Alberto Urbina**

**- Espinoza,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:21

- CR

- 103

- 1

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam**  **:** * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Alberto Urbina

- Espinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Urbina

- Espinoza has not filed a

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40526 Document: 00516137791 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2021No. 21

- 40526

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue fo r appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-40526 Document: 00516137791 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2021
#                                                                         The Invisible Hand Helping Communities Heal: The Sailors Behind Navy Mortuary Services                                                                    

##### by Courtney Pollock, NAVSTA Rota Public Affairs 

23 February 2024

                NAVAL STATION ROTA, Spain (September 9, 2023) Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class Julianne Thompson,  a Navy mortician assigned to Navy and Marine Corps Mortuary Detachment Rota, Spain, poses for a photo September 9, 2023. As the "Gateway to the Mediterranean,” NAVSTA Rota provides U.S, NATO and allied forces a strategic hub for operations in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. NAVSTA Rota is a force multiplier, capable of promptly deploying and supporting combat-ready forces through land, air and sea, enabling warfighters and their families, sustaining the fleet and fostering the U.S. and Spanish partnership. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Drace Wilson)            

                230906-N-NC885-1030            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Petty Officer 2nd Class Drace Wilson

VIRIN: 230906-N-NC885-1030

Tags:
**Mortician**Corpsman**Mortuary**NAVSTA Rota
**Exhibit 13.1**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of sanofi-aventis, a French*société anonyme* (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The annualreport on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-Ffairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 6, 2008 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto sanofi-aventis and will be retained by sanofi-aventis and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

1
Exhibit 10.7


                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                    EMPLOYMENT (CHANGE OF CONTROL) AGREEMENT

            This Amendment to Employment (Change of Control) Agreement (the
"Amendment") is made and entered into effective November 4, 1999 (the "Effective
Date") by and between _______ (the "Employee") and Research, Incorporated (the
"Company").

            WHEREAS, Employee and Company have entered into an Employee (Change
of Control) Agreement dated May 21, 1999 (the "Agreement") and desire to amend
that agreement.

            NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

            1. Section 1(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety
as follows:

                        "(c) "Change of Control" shall mean (i) a corporate
            reorganization of the Company which results in the stockholders of
            the Company immediately prior to such reorganization owing less than
            50% of the combined voting power of the capital stock of the
            surviving company immediately following such reorganization; (ii)
            sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; (iii)
            sale of substantially all of the assets of a business unit if
            employee is the manager or staff member of that business unit
            immediately prior to such sale; or (iv) the termination of
            employee's employment of the Company as a result of the sale of a
            business unit, whether or not Employee is assigned to that business
            unit."

            2. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as
follows:

            "4 Duration. This Agreement shall terminate at such time as the
            Board of Directors adopts a resolution terminating this Agreement
            provided at such time all obligations accrued to the date of
            termination have been satisfied."

            3. Except for the changes provided herein, the Agreement remains in
full force and effect.

                                       RESEARCH, INCORPORATED


                                       By
                                         -----------------------------------

                                       Its
                                          ----------------------------------


                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Employee
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00488-CR

David Vernon Dees

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1252463D)

December 27, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
#### WOLF, Respondent, v. ANCIENT ORDER OF AMERICAN STAR, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Lena Wolf against the Ancient Order of American Star. Wm. N. Loew, for appellant. A. P. Wagener, for respondent.

FITZSIMONS, J.

The contest in this case was solely one of fact for the jury to determine. They evidently believed plaintiff’s version, and disbelieved defendant’s, as they had a right. The eviden< e is quite sufficient to sustain the verdict. Finding no error, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 3 of 3
Clear All

        14 December 2022    

                    USS Roosevelt, Leading the Way on Warfare Development                 
                MEDITERRANEAN SEA – Five Officers trained as Warfare Tactics Instructors currently serve aboard the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Roosevelt (DDG 80), demonstrating their continued commitment to elite tactical excellence and training onboard.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#                                                                         Naval Air Station Patuxent River Gets Earth Day Honors for Shoreline Restoration Work                                                                    

##### by Mr. Rick Docksai

06 April 2023

                Plants being laid out for the first scheduled planting, which took place in October 2021.            

                Naval Air Station Patuxent River Gets Earth Day Honors for Shoreline Restoration Work            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Rick Docksai

VIRIN: 210112-O-SP864-165

Tags:
**NDW**Naval District Washington**CNIC**Commander Navy Installations Command**Earth Day**Pax River**Patuxent River**Environmental
Order entered October 1 8 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 00770 - CV DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC., Appellant

V. HIGHLAND CAPITAL MAN AGEMENT, L.P., AND P ATRICK DAUGHERTY, Appellee s On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 12 - 04005



### O RDER Before the Court is a ppellant Dow Jones & Company, Inc.’s October 9, 2018 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority . We GRANT the Motion and ORDER that the supplemental authority we received on October 9, 2018 is filed as of the date of this order

. /s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE