alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

               INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT'S CONSENT
               -------------------------------------------------


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Medical  Dynamics,  Inc. on Form S-3 (SEC File No.  333-42631  with an effective
date of January 27, 1998) and Forms S-8 (SEC File Nos.  333-08201  and 333-11931
with effective dates of July 16, 1996 and September 13, 1996,  respectively)  of
our report dated December 29, 1998 on our audits of the  consolidated  financial
statements of Medical Dynamics, Inc. as of september 30, 1998, and for the years
ended September 1998 and 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report of
Medical Dynamics, Inc. on Form 10-KSB.


HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP


Denver, Colorado
January 12, 1999
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




Date:  April  24,  2003               /s/Neil  Christiansen
                                      -------------------------
                                      Neil  Christiansen
                                      Chief  Executive  Officer
                                      Chief  Financial  Officer
#### IN RE NASHIAH C.

*Denise P. Ansell,*in support of the petition.

*Clare E. Kindall,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided April 12, 2005

The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 210 (AC 25098), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 39 Filed 01/24/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 39 Filed 01/24/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 39 Filed 01/24/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 39 Filed 01/24/2008 Page 4 of 4
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*BRUCE LEFORT

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 751 (AC 24456), is denied.

*911
      *William, B. Westcott,*in support of the petition.

*Sarah Hanna,*special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2005
Case 1:07-cv-05736-LAK Document 3 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05736-LAK Document 3 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009046EN.01002601.xml

| 25.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/26

---

Notice concerning the implementation of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the organisation and use of the airspace in the single European sky

(Publication of Member States' decisions establishing functional airspace blocks)

(Publication of Member States' decisions establishing functional airspace blocks)

(2009/C 46/06)

| Member State(s) | Reference | Name of functional airspace block | Entry into force |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| UK, Ireland | MoU, signed 12 June 2008 | UK/Ireland Functional Airspace Block | 14 July 2008 |

Member State(s)

Reference

Name of functional airspace block

Entry into force

UK, Ireland

MoU, signed 12 June 2008

UK/Ireland Functional Airspace Block

14 July 2008

---
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-01543-AKH Document 25 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Alliance  Towers,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

Date:    August 16, 2004                        By:    /s/ Robert Sandburg
                                                       -------------------------
                                                Name:  Robert Sandburg
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Alliance  Towers,  Inc.
and will be retained by Alliance  Towers,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                 EXHIBIT 32.1-1
<PAGE>




                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF
                        LAZARE KAPLAN INTERNATIONAL INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         NAME                                     ORGANIZED UNDER LAWS OF
         ----                                     -----------------------
<S>                                                    <C>
         Lazare Kaplan (Sierra Leone) Limited          Sierra Leone
         Lazare Kaplan Japan Inc.                      Delaware
         Lazare Kaplan Europe Inc.                     Delaware
         Lazare Kaplan Belgium, N.V.                   Belgium
         Lazare Kaplan Africa Inc.                     Delaware
         Lazare Kaplan Ghana Ltd.                      Bermuda
         Lazare Kaplan (Bermuda) Ltd.                  Bermuda
         Kaplan Offshore Trading Company               Bermuda
         Supreme Gems N.V.                             Belgium
         LK Enterprises Inc.                           Delaware
         RCS, Inc.                                     Delaware
         Lazare Kaplan (Russia) Inc.                   Delaware
         Pegasus Overseas Limited                      Barbados
</TABLE>


                                       51

<PAGE>
#### BEEKMAN, Appellant, v. HORN SILVER MIN. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

March, 1894.)

Action by Livingston Beekman, as administrator, against the Horn Silver Mining Company.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                               18,074
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       249,577
<ALLOWANCES>                         15,910
<INVENTORY>                          98,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    362,474
<PP&E>                              423,482
<DEPRECIATION>                      275,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      836,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               360,556
<BONDS>                             445,240
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 24
<OTHER-SE>                          (29,246)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        836,293
<SALES>                             900,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    900,150
<CGS>                               546,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       809,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   24,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      66,300
<INCOME-TAX>                         26,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  39,780
<DISCONTINUED>                       (2,666)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         37,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.58
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01509-AKH Document 27 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01509-AKH Document 27 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01509-AKH Document 27 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 3 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 4 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 5 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 6 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 7 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 59-8 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 8 of 8
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 157 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 157

 To repeal the provisions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 
 Act prohibiting the bringing of qualified civil liability actions in 
                        Federal or State court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

  Mr. Evans introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the provisions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 
 Act prohibiting the bringing of qualified civil liability actions in 
                        Federal or State court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Manufacturers Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON BRINGING QUALIFIED CIVIL LIABILITY 
              ACTIONS IN FEDERAL OR STATE COURT.

    Sections 2 through 4 of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 
Act (15 U.S.C. 7901-7903; Public Law 109-92) are hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES v. Airman Basic Joseph S. GARCIA, FR [ XXX-XX-XXXX ] Headquarters, 57th Combat Support Group USAF Tactical Fighter Weapons Center (TAC).

ACM S24132 (f rev.).

U. S. Air Force Court of Military Review.

5 Sept. 1975.

*532Appellate counsel for the Accused: Colonel William E. Cordingly and Major Byron D. Baur.

Appellate counsel for the United States: Colonel C. F. Bennett and Captain Frederick P. Waite.

DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

PER CURIAM:

The record of trial in this case has been returned to this Court pursuant to the Order of the United States Court of Military Appeals. *United States v. Garcia,*23 U.S.C.M.A. 479, 50 C.M.R. 498, 1 M.J. 77 (1975).

The accused was convicted by special court-martial of an offense of forgery by uttering a check with intent to defraud and an offense of absence without authority, in violation of Articles 123 and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 923, 886. The accused’s sentence extended to a bad conduct discharge and confinement at hard labor for four months.*

On the reprinted cover page of the staff judge advocate’s post-trial review, the incorrect entry of the letter “G” indicated that the accused had entered a plea of guilty to the absence charge. Although we found this to be error, we were of the opinion that it was not prejudicial under the particular circumstances of the case. *United States v. Garcia,*50 C.M.R. 263 (A.F.C.M.R. 1975). The Court of Military Appeals disagreed and found prejudicial error from this erroneous advice. The Court of Military Appeals further instructed that this Court could either set aside the findings of guilty of the absence specification and reassess the sentence or order a new review and action.

We have reviewed anew the entire record in this case and determined that justice can best be served by disapproving the absence charge and specification and reassessing the sentence. Accordingly, the findings of guilty as to the absence without authority offense are hereby set aside. The charge and specification are ordered dismissed.

Reassessing the sentence, we find it nonetheless to be appropriate. In this regard, we note that the period of absence was for only a period of six days. The forgery offense was by far the more serious charge against the accused and, viewing the record of the accused’s previous misconduct which was properly before the court, we are convinced that the sentence adjudged was not materially affected by the short absence charge. Based upon the whole record, we find the bad conduct discharge and the period of confinement at hard labor to be appropriate for the sustained offense.

The approved findings of guilty, as modified herein, and the sentence are

Affirmed.

*

 On 18 April 1975, by Special Court-Martial Order No. 126, the Commander, Lowry Technical Training Center, Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado, suspended the punitive discharge until 17 October 1975, with provision for automatic remission.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 866 

To provide an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentence requirements 

for a law enforcement officer who uses, carries, or possesses a firearm 

during and in relation to a crime of violence committed while pursuing 

or apprehending a suspect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. LATTA, Mr. GINGREY of 

Georgia, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, 

Mr. HARPER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. KINGSTON, and Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentence requirements for a law enforcement officer who 

uses, carries, or possesses a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence committed while pursuing 

or apprehending a suspect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Enforcement Pro5 tection Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 866 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO CERTAIN MANDATORY MINIMUM 

2 SENTENCING REQUIREMENTS FOR A LAW EN3 FORCEMENT OFFICER WHO USES, CARRIES, 

4 OR POSSESSES A FIREARM DURING AND IN 

5 RELATION TO A CRIME OF VIOLENCE COM6 MITTED WHILE PURSUING OR APPRE7 HENDING A SUSPECT. 

8 Section 924(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended by redesignating subparagraphs (B) through (D) 

10 as subparagraphs (C) through (E), respectively, and in11 serting after subparagraph (A) the following: 

12 ‘‘(B) The minimum sentencing requirements of sub13 paragraph (A) shall not apply if— 

14 ‘‘(i) at the time the person used, carried, or 

15 possessed the firearm, the person was a law enforce16 ment officer authorized to carry the firearm; 

17 ‘‘(ii) the offense under this paragraph occurred 

18 while the person was on-duty, and during or in rela19 tion to the pursuit or apprehension of an individual 

20 who the person reasonably believed had committed a 

21 crime; and 

22 ‘‘(iii) the crime committed by the person during 

23 and in relation to which the offense under this para24 graph occurred is a crime of violence.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
JACK JORY,

 Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE 

APPEALS COMMISSION,

 Appellee.

_______________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.

CASE NO. 1D15-4365

Opinion filed March 2, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Jack Jory, pro se, Appellant.

Norman A. Blessing, General Counsel, Louis A. Gutierrez, Assistant Court Chief,

and Katie E. Sabo, Appellate Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals 

Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to relinquish jurisdiction is treated as a confession of 

error. We quash the final order and remand for further proceedings.

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### ADRIAN D. SANTIAGO *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

The petitioner Adrian D. Santiago’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 568 (AC 24980), is denied.

*931
      *Avery S. Chapman,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Rita M. Shair,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 21, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Commercial Power Finance, Inc., General Partner of Telecommunications Income
Fund XI, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify that this Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005, and the financial statements therein, fully
comply with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB and the
financial statements therein fairly present, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the report.


November 4, 2005                            /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                 Thomas J. Berthel
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Commercial Power Finance, Inc.
                                                 General Partner
                                                 Telecommunications Income
                                                 Fund XI, L.P.
#### GARLOCK, Respondent, v. GARLOCK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department,

July 14, 1894.)

Action by Catherine A. Garlock against Valentine O. Garlock. From an order of the special term, granting leave to the plaintiff to issue execution on a judgment for alimony in an action-for an absolute divorce, defendant appeals. C. E. Phillips (Z. S. Westbrook, of counsel), for appellant. D. S. Morrel, for respondent.

MAYHAM, P. J.

On a careful examination of the record on this motion, we can find no legal ground for reversal of the order made at the special term, from which this appeal is taken. Order affirmedg. with $10 costs and printing disbursements.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23



                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the 1992 Incentive Stock Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-58564) and the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-87062) of Newport Corporation of
our report dated January 26, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Newport Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Orange County, California
March 22, 1999
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Minerly, Senior Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ James C. MinerlyJames C. MinerlySenior Financial OfficerJanuary 25, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent, Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Clear All

        27 June 2022    

                    Navy commissions fast-attack submarine USS Montana                  
                NORFOLK - The Navy commissioned the Virginia-class fast-attack submarine USS Montana (SSN 794) in a traditional ceremony held Saturday, June 25, at Naval Station Norfolk.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website