alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND THE NOTES
TO THE  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                               0000205520
<NAME>                              KNIGHT-RIDDER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
<CURRENCY>                          USD
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            160,291
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     374,746
<ALLOWANCES>                       14,963
<INVENTORY>                        50,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  641,115
<PP&E>                          1,774,085
<DEPRECIATION>                    727,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,355,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             598,656
<BONDS>                         1,639,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                         1,755
<COMMON>                            1,700
<OTHER-SE>                      1,548,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,355,142
<SALES>                         2,876,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,876,785
<CGS>                             466,329    <F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,370,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 (187,824)   <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   23,332
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                102,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   693,852
<INCOME-TAX>                      297,348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               396,504
<DISCONTINUED>                     16,511   <F3>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      413,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        4.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                        4.08
        
<FN>
<F1>  COST OF GOODS SOLD CONSISTS OF NEWSPRINT, INK, AND SUPPLEMENTS.
<F2>  OTHER  EXPENSES  CONSISTS  OF ALL  NON-OPERATING  INCOME AND  COSTS,  NET,
      EXCLUDING INCOME TAXES. AMOUNT INCLUDES INTEREST EXPENSE,  NET OF INTEREST
      INCOME AND OTHER  NON-OPERATING  COSTS, NET OF  NON-OPERATING  INCOME THAT
      INCLUDES PRETAX GAINS AGGREGATING $283.1 MILLION ON THE SALES OF TKR CABLE
      AND FOUR NEWSPAPERS,  AND THE GAIN ON THE BOULDER NEWSPAPER EXCHANGE.  SEE
      ITEM 8, NOTE G.
<F3>  INCLUDES $15.3 MILLION NET GAIN ON THE SALE OF KRII.  SEE ITEM 8, NOTE G.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# CE2010212EN.01032301.xml

| 5.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 212/323 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 212/323

---

Wednesday 6 May 2009Credit requirements directives ***I

P6_TA(2009)0367

European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 May 2009 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC as regards banks affiliated to central institutions, certain own funds items, large exposures, supervisory arrangements, and crisis management (COM(2008)0602 – (C6-0339/2008 – 2008/0191(COD))

2010/C 212 E/47

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council (COM(2008)0602),

having regard to the draft Commission directive amending certain annexes to Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards technical provisions concerning risk management and Parliament's resolution of 16 December 2008 thereon (1),

1

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 47(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0339/2008),

having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 29 April 2009 to adopt the proposal as amended, in accordance with the first indent in the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0139/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0607.

1

---

Wednesday 6 May 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0191

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 6 May 2009 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/48/EC, 2006/49/EC and 2007/64/EC as regards banks affiliated to central institutions, certain own funds items, large exposures, supervisory arrangements, and crisis management

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/111/EC.)

---
Exhibit 10.39


 


AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE VOTING RIGHTS PROXY AND FINANCIAL SUPPORTING AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE
VOTING RIGHTS PROXY AND FINANCIAL SUPPORTING AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of May 13, 2019, by and
among Chongqing Jinghuangtai Enterprise Management and Consulting Co., Ltd., a foreign investment enterprise incorporated under
the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) (“WOFE”); Chongqing Penglin Food
Co., Ltd., a limited liability company organized under the laws of the PRC (“Penglin”) and the Xiaolin Cao,
a shareholder holding 0.8% of the equity interests of Penglin (“Shareholder”, with WOFE and Penglin collectively
referred to as the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS, in connection
with a certain Technical Consultation and Service Agreement dated as of October 9, 2017, and, Amendment to Technical Consultation
and Service Agreement dated as of February 25, 2018 (collectively, the “Consulting Agreement”), WOFE entered
into an Voting Rights Proxy and Financial Supporting Agreement (the “Voting Rights Agreement”) with Penglin
and Shareholder;


 


WHEREAS, Shareholder
and Zeshu Dai, as of the date hereof, have entered into a certain Share Transfer Agreement (the “Share Transfer Agreement”),
pursuant to which Shareholder has transferred all equity interest of Penglin to Zeshu Dai and no longer been the shareholder of
Penglin;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration,
the Parties agree as follows:


 


A.       TERMINATION
OF THE VOTING RIGHTS PROXY AND FINANCIAL SUPPORTING AGREEMENT. Each of WFOE, Penglin and Shareholder hereby agree to terminate
the Voting Rights Agreement and its Exhibit A Power of Attorney.


 


B.       GOVERNING
LAW. This Agreement shall be governed and construed under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, and shall be binding
on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.


 


C.       COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one instrument.


 


[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]


 






     


     


    

 





SIGNATURE PAGE


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their legal representatives and duly
authorized representatives on their behalf as of the date first set forth above.


 


Chongqing Jinghuangtai Enterprise Management and Consulting
Co., Ltd.


 


 


	By:	/s/
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Name:
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Title:
    Legal Representative	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Chongqing
    Penglin Food Co., Ltd.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Name:
    Zeshu Dai	 
	Title:
    Legal Representative	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Xiaolin
    Cao	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Xiaolin Cao	 
	Xiaolin
    Cao
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1425

DEREK N. JARVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1573

DEREK N. JARVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:07-cv-03385-DKC)

Submitted: December 17, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Michelle 

Bodley Radcliffe, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, 

Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil action and ruling on related matters, and 

the later order denying his motions to reconsider, for leave to 

appeal in forma pauperis, and for transcripts at government 

expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services & Leasing 

Co., No. 8:07-cv-03385-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2010 & May 11, 

2010). 

We also deny Jarvis’ petition for a writ of mandamus 

seeking to recuse the magistrate judge and district judge who 

ruled on his claims below. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy 

and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. 

U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, 

mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a 

clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan 

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Jarvis has failed to 

establish the grounds needed for relief. See Shaw v. Martin, 

733 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1984) (providing grounds needed for 

recusal). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
4

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# CE2010137EN.01006703.xml

| 27.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 137/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 137/67

---

Thursday 2 April 2009Voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) ***I

P6_TA(2009)0210

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 April 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (COM(2008)0402 – C6-0278/2008 – 2008/0154(COD))

2010/C 137 E/21

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0402),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0278/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0084/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

Thursday 2 April 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0154

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 2 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No ....)

---
|   | (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /S/ Jay M. Meilstrup    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Jay M. Meilstrup        |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                    |
|   |   | September 9, 2009       |
# C_2009062EN.01002301.xml

| 17.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/23

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Deadline extension

Request from a contracting entity

(2009/C 62/09)

On 26 February 2009, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).

1

The request from Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V. concerns exploration for, or extraction of, oil and gas in the Netherlands. The request was published in OJ C 53 of 6 March 2009, p. 27. The initial deadline was 27 May 2009.

In accordance with the second sentence of Article 30(6), since the Commission needs to obtain and examine additional information, the period within which the Commission must take a decision on this request has been extended by three months.

The final deadline is therefore 27 August 2009.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#                                                                         USS Milwaukee deploys, will support counter-illicit trafficking in Caribbean, Eastern Pacific                                                                    

##### by Lt. Anthony Junco, Commander, Littoral Combat Ship Squadron TWO

19 October 2022
                MAYPORT, Fla. (Oct. 18, 2022) Family members wave to their loved ones as the Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Milwaukee (LCS 5) departs Naval Station Mayport, Oct. 18 , 2022.  Milwaukee is one of four ships assigned to Surface Division 21. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. Anthony Junco)                            221018-N-WH773-157                            MAYPORT, Fla. (Oct. 18, 2022) Family members wave to their loved ones as the Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Milwaukee (LCS 5) departs Naval Station Mayport, Oct. 18 , 2022.  Milwaukee is one of four ships assigned to Surface Division 21. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. Anthony Junco)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Lt. Anthony JuncoVIRIN: 221018-N-WH773-157MAYPORT, Fla. -The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Milwaukee (LCS 5), along with the "Dragon Whales" of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 28 Detachment 9 and embarked U.S. Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachment (LEDET), departed from Naval Station Mayport Oct. 18, starting its second deployment this year to support U.S. 4th Fleet area of operations.Milwaukee will support counter-illicit trafficking in the Caribbean and the Eastern Pacific. Milwaukee’s operations will also involve exercises and exchanges with partner nations, supporting U.S. 4th Fleet efforts to enhance capability and improve interoperability e while reinforcing the Fleet’s position as the regional partner of choice.Deploying an LCS to the region demonstrates the U.S. commitment to regional security. The ship’s size, speed, and agility make LCS ideal for narcotics interdictions, partner engagements and port access.“This crew is excited to take the ship on another deployment to 4th Fleet. We have some new Sailors that are looking forward to see new parts of the world, and the Sailors who deployed last time are ready to execute their mission once again,” said Cmdr. Brian A. Forster, commanding officer of Milwaukee. “The interoperability and exercise with our partner nations were the highlight of last deployment and we look forward to doing the same. Building peace through partnership is a core aspect of any deployment and the Sailors of USS Milwaukee are looking forward to working with our allies.”Manned by more than 100 Sailors, Milwaukee’s crew will consist of surface warfare mission-package personnel, a U.S. Coast Guard law enforcement detachment and an aviation detachment, who will operate the embarked MH-60S helicopter.USS Milwaukee is operationally assigned to U.S. 2nd Fleet and is one of four littoral combat ships under Surface Division 21.

Tags:
**USS Milwaukee (LCS 5)**LCS**Littoral Combat Ship**Caribbean**eastern pacific**Fourth Fleet**SOUTHCOM

Terms:
**C4F**Navy Headlines
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*LLOYD GEORGE MORGAN, JR.

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*Pamela S. Nagy,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

Decided February 10, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 196 (AC 23615), is denied.
#### Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Appellant, v Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), and defendant, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company (Lumbermens), are coinsurers of John W. Cowper Co., Inc. (Cowper). Lumbermens denied contractual liability coverage for the payment of a personal injury claim against Cowper. A settlement agreement was entered into between claimant and the two insurers whereby Aetna, which admitted liability coverage, would pay the full amount of settlement and reserve the right to seek a judicial determination of the obligation of both insurers. Thereafter, Aetna commenced this declaratory judgment action. Included in its complaint was a demand for interest. This court determined that there was coverage under Lumbermens’ policy and that Lumbermens and Aetna were equally liable for the amount of the settlement (136 AD2d 246, *Iv denied*73 NY2d 701). Following entry of this court’s order, Lumbermens paid Aetna $83,250 (one half of the settlement), but refused to pay Aetna any interest. Aetna moved to recover interest on the moneys it paid for that portion of the settlement which was lawfully *1004Lumbermens’ obligation. The trial court denied the motion and Aetna now appeals from that order.

The agreement between Aetna and Lumbermens may be construed as an agreement that Aetna advance to Lumbermens any share of the settlement for which Lumbermens might be found responsible. An obligation to pay interest on an advance of money must be expressed or implied in fact or else it does not exist; it is not implied as a matter of law *(New York State Thruway Auth. v Hurd,*25 NY2d 150, 158). When Aetna paid the full amount of the settlement, there was no express agreement that Lumbermens pay interest on any principal amount it was responsible to pay but, under the circumstances, we find that such an agreement was implied.

Here, the commercial context of the transaction supplies the necessary implication of interest *(see, New York State Thruway Auth. v Hurd, supra,*at 157-158; *Rodgers v Clement,*162 NY 422). At the time the settlement agreement was entered into, Lumbermens received a substantial benefit in that, without the expenditure of any of its own moneys, its insured was released from liability and its own liability became fixed. During the period between the time of the settlement and the time of the determination that Lumbermens was equally liable for the loss, Aetna was deprived of the use of the moneys it paid on Lumbermens’ behalf. The only method to compensate Aetna for this deprivation is to include interest on the amount of moneys paid by Aetna on Lumbermens’ behalf *(see, Prager v New Jersey Fid. & Plate Glass Ins. Co.,*245 NY 1, 5-6; 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 5001.01). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.— interest on judgment.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 23A


              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-35815, No. 33-35816, No. 33-35817, and No. 33-42452 on Form S-8 of our
report dated March 6, 1996 incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Liqui-Box Corporation for the year ended December 30, 1995.

Our audit of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the 1995 financial statement schedule of Liqui-Box Corporation,
listed in Item 14(a). This financial statement schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audit. In our opinion, such 1995 financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic 1995 financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material aspects the information set forth therein.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 26, 1996
Exhibit 32.2

                           Certification of Controller
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of United  Tennessee
Bankshares,   Inc.  I,  Chris  H.  Triplett,   Controller  of  United  Tennessee
Bankshares,  Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of United
     Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.

Date:  November 12, 2003
                                                 /s/ Chris H. Triplett
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Chris H. Triplett
                                                 Controller