alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 61

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 
     date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 
     date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Prison Bureau Nonviolent 
Offender Relief Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT OFFENDERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3624 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``at the early release 
        date provided in subsection (g), if applicable, or otherwise'' 
        after ``A prisoner shall be released by the Bureau of 
        Prisons''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Early Release for Certain Nonviolent Offenders.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Bureau of Prisons, 
pursuant to a good time policy, shall release from confinement a 
prisoner who has served one half or more of his term of imprisonment 
(including any consecutive term or terms of imprisonment) if that 
prisoner--
            ``(1) has attained the age of 45 years;
            ``(2) has never been convicted of a crime of violence; and
            ``(3) has not engaged in any violation, involving violent 
        conduct, of institutional disciplinary regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 829 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 829

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained at Naval 
 Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities in North Carolina or to 
               house such individuals at such facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2009

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained at Naval 
 Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities in North Carolina or to 
               house such individuals at such facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER INDIVIDUALS DETAINED 
              AT NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FACILITIES IN 
              NORTH CAROLINA.

    None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to any 
Federal department or agency may be used to transfer any individual 
detained by the United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 
to any military installation located in the State of North Carolina or 
any Federal detention center located in the State of North Carolina or 
to house any such individual at such an installation or detention 
center.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 13654.

*En Banc.*

July 17, 1917.]

#### Puget Sound Independent Telephone Company, *Appellant,*v. The City of Everett et *al., Respondents.**1*

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered December 6, 1915, dismissing an action to restrain the enforcement of an ordinance, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

Reversed.

*Coleman & Fogarty*and *Q. A. Kaune,*for appellant.

*Wm. A. Johnson,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 166 Pac. 655.

Per Curiam.

The question presented in this case is, in all of its essential particulars, the same as that presented in the case of *Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Everett, ante*p. 259, 166 Pac. 650, and is controlled thereby. For the reasons given for the reversal of that case, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to overrule the demurrer.
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 29 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 29 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 29 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of Peter J. Powers et al., Appellants, v Gertrude Strohm et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme County, New York County (Edith Miller, J.), entered on August 22, 1989, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Smith, Rubin and Kassal, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,848]

                    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 18, 2000, applicable to workers of Genicom Corporation, Temple, Texas. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 12, 2000 (65 FR 55050).                

At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that the Department inadvertently failed to identify the subject firm title name in its entirety. The Department is amending the certification determination to correctly identify the subject firm title name to read “Genicom Corporation, currently known as IER, Inc.”.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,848 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Genicom Corporation, currently known as IER, Inc., Temple, Texas who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 16, 1999 through August 18, 2002 are eligile to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of April, 1999.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-11104 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BRENDA LAY LYNN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-94-130, CA-97-29-3)
Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: December 23, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brenda Lay Lynn, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying three post-conviction motions. Insofar as appellant appeals the district court's decision denying her motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm that order on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lynn , No. CA97-29-3 (N.D.W. Va. July 21, 1997). Insofar as appellant seeks to appeal from the motions filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) (1994) seeking a reduction in sentence and an evidentiary hearing in that matter, the notice of appeal was untimely. We therefore dismiss the appeal as to those motions for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "'mandatory and jurisdictional.'" Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Criminal defendants have ten days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The only exception to the appeal period is when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b) upon a showing of excusable neglect. The district court entered its order denying the criminal motions on July 21, 1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed in the district court on September 2, 1997. Though the record contains no certification of when she relayed her notice of appeal to prison authorities for mailing to the district court, it appears that Ap-* Appellant's § 3553(b) motion was untimely. Accordingly, we conclude that remanding to the district court for assessment of whether Appellant can demonstrate excusable neglect for her late notice of appeal is not warranted.
3 pellant mailed the document on August 26, 1997, beyond the ten-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to obtain an extension within the prescribed time frame leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
Clear All

        02 August 2022    

                    Navy Week Charts Course to San Jose, Aug. 15-21                 
                MILLINGTON, Tenn. –  San Jose will host the city's first Navy Week since the creation of the Navy Week program when the Navy visits the area for a week of events Aug. 15-21, in conjunction with the Italian Family Festa.             

        19 April 2022    

                    Navy Week Program Set For Trenton Port Visit May 2-8                 
                MILLINGTON, Tenn. –  Trenton, New Jersey, will host the city's first in-person Navy Week since the creation of the Navy Week program when the Navy visits the area for a week of events May 2-8.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
EXHIBIT 32


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") by Scanner Technologies Corporation
("Registrant"), I, Elwin M. Beaty, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

                  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

                  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                                            By:   /s/Elwin M. Beaty
                                                -------------------------------
                  Dated: March 14, 2005         Elwin M. Beaty
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                 496
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       24,155
<ALLOWANCES>                        10,142
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0
<PP&E>                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      19,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0
<BONDS>                             12,143
<COMMON>                               162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              1
<OTHER-SE>                           5,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        19,636
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     2,241
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   2,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (2,415)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (2,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      4,011
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         1,596
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .10


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 837 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 837

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2009

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 799 United Nations Plaza 
 in New York, New York, as the ``Ronald H. Brown United States Mission 
                   to the United Nations Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 799 United Nations Plaza in New 
York, New York, shall be known and designated as the ``Ronald H. Brown 
United States Mission to the United Nations Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald H. Brown 
United States Mission to the United Nations Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7078

JERRY WAYNE BRADLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALVIN HUDSON; LIEUTENANT BROOKS; D. BROWLIEGH;

L. JACOBS, Nurse; CAPTAIN POFF; G. S. FLINT;

JOHN DOE, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-595-R)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Wayne Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Bradley v. Hudson, No. CA-95-595-R (W.D. Va. June 20, 1995).

We deny Appellant's motions for production of evidence and to

expand the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela Fredette, Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Pamela Fredette                            
|Pamela Fredette                                
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|November 9, 2009                               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to enherent, Corp. and will be retained by
enherent Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Clear All

        23 February 2023    

                    HM3 Ciara Farmer: Black History Month Spotlight                 
                GROTON, Conn. - Hospital Corpsman 3rd Class Ciara Famer, a Virginia Beach native, is proud to be a part of black history.Farmer is currently serving at the Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory. She knew she wanted to pursue a career in the medical field after personally navigating some            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 4 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 5 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 6 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 7 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 8 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 9 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 10 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 11 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 12 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 13 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 14 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 15 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 16 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 17 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 18 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 19 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 20 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 21 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 22 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 23 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 24 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 25 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 26 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 27 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 28 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 29 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 30 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 31 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 32 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 33 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 34 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 35 of 36
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 20 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 36 of 36
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Neil Christiansen

Date: November 9, 2005

Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer