alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1


                        GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                             --------------------


Graybar Foreign Sales Corporation, a Barbados corporation.

Graybar International, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Graybar Financial Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Graybar Electric de Mexico, S. DE R.L. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation.

Graybar Electric Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation.

Graybar Foundation, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Graybar Services, Inc., an Illinois corporation.

Distribution Associates, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Graybar Electric (Ontario) Limited, an Ontario corporation.

Graybar International PTE LTD, a Singapore corporation.

Graybar Business Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Graybar International de Chile Limitada, a Chile limited liability
partnership.
Order entered July 1 5 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00083 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.S.L. AND M.B.L., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District C ourt

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469 - 54150 - 2018

O RDER This is an appeal from the trial court’s order of enforcement. Before the Court is appellee’s July 13, 2022 motion for a sixty

- day extension of time to f il e her brief , currently due Ju ly 17

. Appellee explains the extension is necessary because she “does not y et have the transcript of the enforcement hearing” and will need to “order[] and obtain[]” it to be able to file the brief. She further explains that the current deadline “coincid es with [counsel’s] previously planned trip out of the country” but does not provide the dates of the trip

. We note the record reflects the enforcement hearing was held December 3, 2020. We further note the reporter’s record, filed May 2, 2022 and avail able tocounsel via the Court’s attorney portal , includes the record of th at hearing.

A ccordingly, and not knowing the dates of counsel’s trip, we GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER the brief be filed no later than August 29, 2022. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Intelligent Communication Enterprise Corporation ("the Company") of our report dated April 15, 2010, on our audit of the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year then ended.





Our report, dated April 15, 2010, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has not generated revenues or positive cash flows from operations and has an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2009.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.








/S/ PETERSON SULLIVAN LLP








Seattle, Washington


December 9, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I,Laura J. Neumann, Chief Financial Officer of Arden Group, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 thatto the best of my knowledge (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended January 2,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/LAURA J. NEUMANN |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Name:               | Laura  J. Neumann |
|   | Title:              | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | Date:               | March 10,  2010 |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### DAVIES, Respondent, v. KALBFLEISCH, Appellant.

(City Court of Brooklyn, General Term.

June 25, 1894.)

Action by Welter S. Davies against Froderick W. Kalbfleisch. Edward V. B. Kissam, for appellant. XV. Rapelyea Davies, for respondent.

*1143PER CURIAM.

The exceptions at pages 12 and 18 •were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614, 32 N. E. 13. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, David M. Brain, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entertainment Properties Trust (the Company), have executed this
certification for furnishing to the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the filing with the Commission of the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report). I
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief,:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ David M. Brain                   
|                  |  |  |  | David M. Brain                       
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: May 3, 2010 |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        



65
Clear All

        14 September 2023    

                    Saildrones Set Sail in Support of U.S. 4th Fleet’s Operation Windward Stack                 
                KEY WEST, Florida – Commercial operators began deploying 10 Saildrone Voyager Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs) out to sea today, a critical first step in U.S. 4th Fleet’s Operation Windward Stack.            

        01 February 2023    

                    Fourth Navy Expeditionary Logistics Regiment Decommissions After 17 Years of Service                 
                Fourth Navy Expeditionary Logistics Regiment (NELR) held the command’s decommissioning ceremony at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, Jan. 20, 2023.Attendees of the ceremony included Rear Adm. Dennis Collins, Commander, Navy Expeditionary Logistics Support Group; Capt. Andrew Duessel, Commodore,            

        30 July 2022    

                    USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28) Commissions                 
                FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. -- The U.S. Navy commissioned its newest Amphibious Transport Dock ship USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28) July 30, 2022, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.            

        26 June 2022    

                    USS Jason Dunham returns to homeport in Florida                 
                USS Jason Dunham (DDG 109) returns to Naval Station Mayport, Fla.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### GRANT v. VILLAGE OF GROTON.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Damases—Personal Injuries—Declarations after Accident.

In an action for personal injuries, declarations of plaintiff, made several months after the accident, as to his suffering, are not admissible.

Appeal from circuit court, Tompkins county.

Action by Anna E. Grant, by Ida L. Grant, guardian ad litem, against the village of Groton, for personal injuries. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $1,650 damages and $1-14.55 costs, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

G. M. Stoddard, for appellant.

Smith & Dickinson, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In the course of the charge the trial judge submitted to the jury the question whether it was a negligent act or a prudent act or an imprudent act and a negligent act on the part of the commissioner to omit to put up a warning or guards at the end of the sidewalk to keep people from walking off from the sidewalk and onto the bridge that was in that defective condition. He added: “If you say it was an imprudent act, it was a negligent act, why, then the village is responsible for the negligent act of the commissioner of highways; for it was his business to keep those roads in safety. He was acting, for the village in that respect.” And again he charged: “But it was his business to take care that the sidewalks

were not permitted to be left open to this hole.” An exception was taken to the charge as thus given. No such negligence was alleged in the complaint, and it is at least questionable whether the plaintiff should have been permitted to recover upon the ground so stated in the charge. We think it was error to receive the declarations of the plaintiff as to headache, made several months after the accident occurred. Roche v. Railroad Co., 105 N. Y. 294, 11 N. E. 630. Non-expert witnesses were improperly permitted to testify as to mental condition and impaired memory of the plaintiff after the accident occurred. We grant a new trial upon the exceptions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          38,412
<SECURITIES>                                     1,475
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,232
<PP&E>                                         840,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                 220,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 739,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,197
<BONDS>                                        389,761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   739,465
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,778
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,640
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,640
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# 6H

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0216 MATTHEW PEAVLER,

Plaint iff and Appellant, v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN SUPPLY,

Defendant and Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT
This appeal bein g subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Carey E.**  **Matovich,** who se name appears next on th e list of attorneys desiring appo int me nta s mediators fo r Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time periods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from th e date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s May 18, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of th e Supreme Court c: Ni cho la s LeTang, Daniela E. Pavuk, Carey E. Matovich 05/18/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0216
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00254

- CV

C HARLOTTE S KAGGS T AYLOR

, Appellant

V

.

W ILLIAM C LARK T AYLOR

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 442nd District

Court

of Denton County (18

- 6356

- 442)

October 11, 2018

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the recor d on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordere d that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6487 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prevent the proceeds or instrumentalities of foreign crime located in the United States from being shielded 

from foreign forfeiture proceedings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2010 

Ms. CHU (for herself and Mr. POE of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prevent the proceeds or instrumentalities of foreign crime located in 

the United States from being shielded from foreign forfeiture proceedings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Foreign 

5 Criminal Assets for Forfeiture Act of 2010’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6487 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO FOR2 FEITURE UNDER FOREIGN LAW. 

3 Section 2467(d)(3)(A) of title 28, United States 

4 Code, is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(A) RESTRAINING ORDERS.— 

6 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—To preserve the 

7 availability of property subject to civil or 

8 criminal forfeiture under foreign law, the 

9 Government may apply for, and the court 

10 may issue, a restraining order at any time 

11 before or after the initiation of forfeiture 

12 proceedings by a foreign nation. 

13 ‘‘(ii) PROCEDURES.— 

14 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—A restraining 

15 order under this subparagraph shall 

16 be issued in a manner consistent with 

17 subparagraphs (A), (C), and (E) of 

18 paragraph (1) and the procedural due 

19 process protections for a restraining 

20 order under section 983(j) of title 18. 

21 ‘‘(II) APPLICATION.—For pur22 poses of applying such section 

23 983(j)— 

24 ‘‘(aa) references in such sec25 tion 983(j) to civil forfeiture or 

26 the filing of a complaint shall be 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6487 IH

1 deemed to refer to the applicable 

2 foreign criminal or forfeiture pro3 ceedings; and 

4 ‘‘(bb) the reference in para5 graph (1)(B)(i) of such section 

6 983(j) to the United States shall 

7 be deemed to refer to the foreign 

8 nation.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NASDAQ, INC., 

Appellant

v.

INVESTORS EXCHANGE LLC, 

Appellee

______________________

2022-1629

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2018-

00039.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 22-1629 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2022
2 NASDAQ, INC. V. INVESTORS EXCHANGE LLC

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

June 9, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 9, 2022

Case: 22-1629 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 06/09/2022
Exhibit 4.3


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated December 13, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 456 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-233801) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


			/s/ Grant Thornton LLP



 


Chicago, Illinois


December 13, 2019
Clear All

        14 October 2023    

                    USS Mason Departs for Deployment                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Mason (DDG 87) departed its homeport at Naval Station Mayport for a scheduled deployment as part of the Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (IKECSG), Oct. 13.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Opinion issued December 7, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00 326
- CV

——————————— IN RE MOHAMED LAHAM , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Mohamed Laham , filed a petition for a writ of mandamus , challenging the trial court’s May 2, 2023 order denying relator’s “ Motion Requesting Administrative Closure of Case for Lack of Jurisdiction. ” In his mandamus petition, re lator argued that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his request for administrative closure of the underlying cause because on January 28, 2023, the trial court entered an “Order of Partial Dismissal

. ” Relator further argued that this amounted to a final, appealable order because, although the2

order stated that it was a “partial dismissal” and it only dismiss ed the claims of a single defendant, the trial court’s order also included “finality language.” In h is mandamus petiti on, relator request ed that the Court grant his petition for writ of
mandamus and direct the trial court “ to take no further action in [the underlying cause] as it pertains to [r]elator other than directing the Harris County District Clerk
to close the case administratively .” 1 We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower , and Guerra.

1 The underlying case is Lydia Diaz v. Manel Chamsine, Luis A. Curbelo

- Diaz, and Mohamed Laham , Cause No. 2022

- 40002, in the 270th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Dedra Davis presiding.
Clear All

        25 July 2023    

                    Pharmacy tech fills medical capability aboard USS Arleigh Burke                 
                Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class Travis Billow, assigned to Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command (NMRTC) Rota, supported a 65-day temporary assigned duty (TAD) aboard guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51).            

        05 April 2023    

                    Medical Inspector General Evaluates Readiness at Naval Medical Forces Atlantic                 
                The Navy’s Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED) Medical Inspector General (MEDIG) evaluated the performance, efficiency, and mission readiness at Commander, Naval Medical Forces Atlantic (NMFL) during a scheduled command inspection onboard Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads Portsmouth            

        25 March 2023    

                    Medical Forces Atlantic Announces 2022 Regional Sailor of the Year                 
                Hospital Corpsman 1st Class Travis S. Hunter was named the Naval Medical Forces Atlantic (NMFL) 2022 Regional Sailor of the Year (SOY) at a ceremony onboard Naval Support Activity (NSA) Portsmouth-Annex, March 24.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website