alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT15

May  9,  2006

Securitiesand Exchange Commission100 F Street, N.E.Washington, D.C.20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that ourreport dated May  9,  2006 on our review of interimfinancial information of W. R. Grace & Co. (the‘‘Company’’) for the three-month periodsended March  31,  2006 and March  31,  2005 andincluded in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2006, is incorporated by reference in itsRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-37024, 333-49083,333-49507, 333-49509, 333-49511, 333-49513, 333-49515 and333-49517).

Very truly yours,

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMcLean,Virginia

----
# CE2010285EN.01012501.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 285/125 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 285/125

---

Tuesday 24 November 2009Recovery plan for Greenland halibut *

P7_TA(2009)0079

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2009 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2115/2005 of 20 December 2005 establishing a recovery plan for Greenland halibut in the framework of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (COM(2009)0127 – C7-0006/2009 – 2009/0041(CNS))

2010/C 285 E/28

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2009)0127),

having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0006/2009),

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A7-0046/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6559 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6559

                   For the relief of Selvin Arevalo.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2010

Ms. Pingree of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Selvin Arevalo.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SELVIN AREVALO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Selvin Arevalo shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Selvin Arevalo enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Selvin Arevalo, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the aliens' 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Selvin 
Arevalo shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Neil  Christiansen,  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




Date:  May  13,  2003                   /s/Neil  Christiansen
                                        -------------------------
                                        Neil  Christiansen
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer
                                        Chief  Financial  Officer
DOCSNY-267027v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

EUGENIUSZ SKRZECZKOWSKI (AND WIFE, 

ALICJA SKRZECZKOWSKI), 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

90 CHURCH STREET LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-4517-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-267027v01 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

/s/ Judith R. Cohen______________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 10 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1580. YANNI PIZZA, LLC v. ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH,

INC.

On June 9, 2020, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s order allowing this Court to

re-instate deadlines on a case-by-case basis, appellant Yanni Pizza, LLC was ordered

to file its appellant’s brief by June 29, 2020. Appellant has neither filed a brief or

requested an extension of time in which to file a brief. Accordingly this appeal is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 07, 2020

07/07/2020
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

             Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-11021 on From S-3 dated December 22, 1986, in Registration Statement No.
33-28010 on Form S-3 dated April 7, 1989, in Registration Statement No.
33-31747 on Form S-8 dated October 30, 1989, in Registration Statement No.
33-69206 on Form S-8 dated May 18, 1993 of Knight-Ridder, Inc. and in the
related Prospectuses, of our report dated January 29, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Knight-Ridder, Inc.
incorporated by reference and included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 29, 1996.

                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                          --------------------- 

Miami, Florida
March 10, 1997









                                      51
ex10_8.htm














TWENTY-FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

















This Twenty-Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of January 1, 2010, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (“Employer”) and Robert M. Gans (“Executive”).












Recitals








	
A)  

	
On September 20, 1994 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Executive and Price Enterprises, Inc.













	
B)  

	
Said Employment Agreement has been assigned to Employer and amended on twenty-three prior occasions;













	
C)  

	
Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:

















Agreement








	
1.  

	
Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides:













	
  

	
2.1

	
Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $278,766 during each year of the Employment Term. Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.







 

 


is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2010, to provide as follows:








	
2.1  

	
Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $284,341 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.







 








	
2.  

	
All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.






















Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.

















EXECUTIVE                                                                                     EMPLOYER


PRICESMART, INC.







Robert M. Gans                                                                           By:           







______________________                                                   Name:      Jose Luis Laparte 


                          Its:           President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clifford Robinson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered April 23, 1984, convicting him of forgery in the second degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him as a second felony offender.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the adjudication of the defendant as a second felony offender and the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.

On July 7, 1980, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to the crime of forgery in the first degree before the Superior Court of Chatham County for the Eastern Judicial Circuit of Georgia. He was adjudicated a second felony offender in the *92instant matter based upon his prior Georgia conviction. The Georgia statute under which the defendant was convicted provides that "[a] person commits the offense of forgery in the first degree when with intent to defraud he knowingly makes, alters, or possesses any writing in a fictitious name or in such manner that the writing as made or altered purports to have been made by another person, at another time, with different provisions, or by authority of one who did not give such authority and utters or delivers such writing” (Ga Code Annot § 26-1701 [a]). However, in order to constitute either forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10) or criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25), both of which are class D felonies, it must be demonstrated, *inter alia,*that the subject forged instrument was of a kind specified in Penal Law § 170.10. The Georgia statute contains no such requirement. Rather, the elements of the Georgia offense more closely coincide with those of the crimes of forgery in the third degree (Penal Law § 170.05) and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree (Penal Law § 170.20), which are both defined as class A misdemeanors. Accordingly, the Georgia crime for which the defendant was convicted was not necessarily punishable as a felony in New York, and the defendant was therefore improperly sentenced as a second felony offender *(see,*Penal Law § 70.06 [1] [b]; *People v Gonzalez,*61 NY2d 586, 589; *People v Giraldo,*106 AD2d 401).

We have examined the remainder of the defendant’s contentions on appeal and find them to be without merit. Niehoff, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### *In re*PORZENSKI, Joseph John

(MR 21810)

St. Charles, MO

*699Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Joseph John Porzenski, who has been disciplined in the State of Missouri, is reprimanded in the State of Illinois.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of TE Products Pipeline Company, LimitedPartnership (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2006 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof, I, William G. Manias, Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the general partner of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ WILLIAM G. MANIAS                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| William G. Manias                          |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| TEPPCO GP, Inc., General Partner           |
|                                       |
| November 7, 2006                           |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership and will be retained by TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6558 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6558

                For the relief of Bernard Didier Pastor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2010

 Mr. Driehaus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Bernard Didier Pastor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR BERNARD DIDIER PASTOR.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Bernard Didier Pastor shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Bernard Didier Pastor enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Bernard Didier Pastor, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Bernard 
Didier Pastor shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Neil Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. As certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.     July ___, 2008/s/ Neil ChristiansenNeil ChristiansenChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer