alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
E-cigarette

Fire Safety

Fires with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) can happen while 

they are being used, charged or transported. Battery failures can 

lead to small explosions.

Use e-cigarettes with caution and follow these safety tips:

ĵ Do not charge your e-cigarette with a phone or tablet charger.

ĵ Replace the batteries if they get wet or damaged.

ĵ Do not charge your e-cigarette overnight.

ĵ Protect your e-cigarette from extreme temperatures.

ĵ Store loose batteries for your e-cigarette in a case. Keep them away from metal 

objects.

For more information about e-cigarette safety, visit www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/

products-ingredients-components/tips-help-avoid-vape-battery-explosions.

For more information and free fire-safety resources, visit

www.usfa.fema.gov.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”), for the period ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald L. Rossetti, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:







1.
            This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
  amended.






2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  February
      9, 2010
            /s/
      Ronald L. RossettiRonald
      L. RossettiChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Neil Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. As certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and     May 9, 2007/s/ Neil ChristiansenNeil ChristiansenChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15-3      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15-3      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15-3      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15-3      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 4 of 4
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 671 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to issue a medal to certain veterans 

who died after their service in the Vietnam War as a direct result 

of that service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to issue a medal to 

certain veterans who died after their service in the Vietnam War as a direct result of that service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘In Memory Medal for 

5 Forgotten Veterans Act’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 671 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDAL TO HONOR VETERANS WHO DIED AS A RE2 SULT OF THEIR SERVICE IN THE VIETNAM 

3 WAR. 

4 (a) MEDAL AUTHORIZED.—There is established a 

5 medal, to be known as the ‘‘Jesus (Chuchi) Salgado 

6 Medal’’, to be issued by the Secretary of Defense for each 

7 veteran of the Vietnam War who died after serving in the 

8 war, but whose death is determined by the Secretary of 

9 Defense to be a direct result of that service, and whose 

10 name is not eligible for placement on the Vietnam Vet11 erans Memorial authorized under Public Law 96–297 (16 

12 U.S.C. 431 note). 

13 (b) APPLICATION AND DESIGN.—The Jesus (Chuchi) 

14 Salgado Medal shall be issued upon receipt by the Sec15 retary of Defense of an application for such medal, sub16 mitted in accordance with such regulations as the Sec17 retary prescribes. The medal shall be of an appropriate 

18 design approved by the Secretary. 

19 (c) ISSUANCE TO REPRESENTATIVE OF DE20 CEASED.—A Jesus (Chuchi) Salgado Medal issued for a 

21 veteran described in subsection (a) shall be issued to the 

22 next-of-kin or representative of such veteran, as des23 ignated by the Secretary of Defense. 

24 (d) ASSISTANCE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF VET25 ERANS AFFAIRS.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

26 make available to the Secretary of Defense such records, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 671 IH

1 and otherwise provide such assistance, as the Secretary 

2 of Defense may require for purposes of this section. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30295 Conference Calendar

FRANK JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-3035-E

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Frank Johnson, Louisiana prisoner # 105244, appeals the district court’s denial of his federal petition for habeas corpus. Johnson argued in the petition that his right to a fair trial was violated when the trial judge ordered him restrained during the jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record and find no reversible error in the denial of the petition.No. 97-30295 -2- Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and adopted by the district court. See Johnson v. Cain , No. 96-3035 (E.D. La., Feb. 6, 1997).
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


Exhibit (21)

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                     LIQUI-BOX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                              Percentage of
                                                                                            Voting Securities
                                                           Jurisdiction of                       Owned by
             Subsidiaries                                  Incorporation                      The Registrant
         ------------------------------------              ---------------                  -----------------
<S>                                                        <C>                              <C>
         Commander Systems, Inc.                                Ohio                               100%

         Corporate Design, Inc.                                 Ohio                               100%

         LB Acquisition Corp.  (dba: B-Bar-B)                   Ohio                               100%

         LB Communications, Inc.                                Ohio                               100%

         LB Development Corp.                                   Ohio                               100%

         LB Investments, Inc.                                 Delaware                             100%

         LB Europe Limited                                    England                              100%

         Inpaco Corporation                                     Ohio                               100%

         Liqui-Box International, Inc.                          Ohio                               100%

         Liqui-Box International, Corp.                      Barbados                              100%

         Liqui-Box of Canada, Ltd.                            Canada                               100%

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
NO. 07-12-00075-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MAY 10, 2012

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF PABLO CHAVEZ AND ARELLI ROJO AND IN THE INTEREST OF 

U.C. AND J.C., CHILDREN

FROM THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT OF HEMPHILL COUNTY;

NO. 6660; HONORABLE STEVEN RAY EMMERT, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**ON MOTION TO DISMISS**

Appellant, Arelli Rojo, has informed this Court by motion to dismiss this appeal that she no longer desires to pursue the appeal.  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).  As there was no contrary agreement of the parties included in appellant’s motion, all costs related to this appeal are assessed against appellant.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).  If dismissal will prevent appellee from seeking relief to which he would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellee to file a timely motion for rehearing.  No motion for rehearing from appellant will be entertained.

								Mackey K. Hancock

									Justice

2
#### SHERWOOD, Respondent, v. CRANE, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Grace Sherwood against William H. Crane. Rose & Putzel, for appellant. Howe & Hummel, for respondent.

FITZSIMONS, J.

Was plaintiff’s engagement for-the run of the play only, or was it for the season, which plaintiff says that defendant’s representative stated to her to be for the term from January 30th to the following June 1st? That is a question of fact, and was properly submitted by the trial justice to the jury. Their finding in plaintiff’s favor upon that question is conclusive, and has ample evidence to sustain it. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment, with costs.
#### DENT v. RYAN.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

June 18, 1894.)

Action by Francis Dent against Stephen V. Ryan.

No opinion. Motion denied.
Fire Safe Seniors

FOR RESIDENTS WHO ALREADY HAVE ALARMS 

OR WILL GET THEM SOON:

• Test smoke alarms every month; you can ask 

someone to test them for you.

FOR RESIDENTS WHO DO NOT HAVE ALARMS 

(AND ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE THEM): 

• A smoke alarm warns you when it senses smoke in 

your home. Put smoke alarms in your home and 

test them each month.

FIRE SAFETY MESSAGES:

• Know two ways out of every room. 

• Never smoke when you are lying down, drowsy, 

or in bed.

• Keep an eye on what you fry. Stand by your pan 

when cooking at high temperatures.

• Keep space heaters 3 feet away from anything 

that can burn, including you.

• Have a professional clean and inspect your 

fireplace, wood stove or coal stove once a year. 

KEY EDUCATIONAL MESSAGES

U.S. Fire Administration
Case 1:07-cv-05738-PKC-AJP Document 10 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05738-PKC-AJP Document 10 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
# USFA and OSHA Presentation on the Emergency Response Notice of Proposed Ruling

**Posted: March 21, 2024**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Codes and standards
            - Leadership
            - Planning

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

USFA’s NFA Superintendent Eriks Gabliks and OSHA’s Director of Standards and Guidance, Andrew Levinson, discuss the history of the Fire Brigades standard and proposed Emergency Response standard. Director Levinson explains the process for submitting comments and proposed timeline.

The *Emergency Response* proposed rule has been published in the Federal Register and is now available for viewing.

OSHA welcomes and encourages the submission of public comments in response to this proposed rule. **The comment period ends on May 6, 2024.**

Comments can be submitted to the Emergency Response Docket at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/OSHA-2007-0073.

Additional information on OSHA's rulemaking process and how stakeholders can participate is available at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/rulemakingprocess.
----

| (amounts      in thousands)                                         | 2009                     | 2008                                 | 2007               | 2006               | 2005               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|
| Interest      expense(1)                                            | $   8,349 | $     5,955 | $  2,534 | $  2,307 | $  4,192 |
| Interest      factor in rental expense                              | 6,128                    | 5,021                                | 5,102              | 4,898              | 5,673              |
| (a) Fixed      charges, as defined                             | 14,477                   | 10,976                               | 7,636              | 7,205              | 9,865              |
| Earnings      (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 35,985                   | (29,209)                             | 70,576             | 41,975             | 40,127             |
| Fixed      charges                                                  | 14,477                   | 10,976                               | 7,636              | 7,205              | 9,865              |
| (b) Earnings      (loss), as defined                           | $      50,462            | $      (18,233)                      | $      78,212      | $      49,180      | $      49,992      |
| (c) Ratio      of earnings to fixed charges (b / a)            | 3.5x                     | —                              | 10.2x              | 6.8x               | 5.1x               |

| (1)   | Includes      amortization of finance costs. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 803 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 803

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to require metropolitan 
  planning organizations to consider greenhouse gas emissions in long-
  range transportation plans and transportation improvement programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2009

 Mr. Doggett (for himself, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Inslee, Mr. McDermott, 
  Mr. Stark, and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to require metropolitan 
  planning organizations to consider greenhouse gas emissions in long-
  range transportation plans and transportation improvement programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Green Transit Act''.

SEC. 2. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANS.

    (a) Highway Planning.--Section 134(c)(2) of title 23, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following sentence: ``Such 
plans and TIPs shall be developed after consideration of emissions of 
greenhouse gases (as defined in section 211(o)(1) of the Clean Air Act 
(42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)) and shall provide for reductions in such 
emissions.''
    (b) Public Transportation Planning.--Section 5303(c)(2) of title 
49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
sentence: ``Such plans and TIPs shall be developed after consideration 
of emissions of greenhouse gases (as defined in section 211(o)(1) of 
the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)) and shall provide for 
reductions in such emissions.''
                                 <all>
```
# CE2010285EN.01011101.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 285/111 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 285/111

---

Tuesday 24 November 2009Electronic communications networks and services ***III

P7_TA(2009)0068

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2009 on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (PE-CONS 3677/2009 – C7-0273/2009 – 2007/0247(COD))

2010/C 285 E/17

(Codecision procedure: third reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3677/2009 – C7-0273/2009),

having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0697),

1

having regard to the amended Commission proposal (COM(2008)0724),

having regard to its position at second reading (2) on the Council common position (3),

2

3

having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position (COM(2009)0420),

having regard to Article 251(5) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 69 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee (A7-0070/2009),

| 1. | Approves the joint text; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the joint text;

| 2. | Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

| 3. | Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward this legislative resolution to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward this legislative resolution to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0449.

1

(2)  Texts adopted, 6.5.2009, P6_TA(2009)0361.

2

(3)  OJ C 103 E, 5.5.2009, p. 1.

3

---
Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Order filed April 24, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00122-CR

____________

REGINALD TYRRELL PRICE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1268303

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) 

and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 70.

The clerk of the 263rd District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court 

the original of State's Exhibit 70, on or before May 4, 2012. The Clerk of this court is 

directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the 

justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the 

original of State's Exhibit 70, to the clerk of the 263rd District Court.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of W. R. Grace &
Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Robert M. Tarola
--------------------------
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 13, 2002
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted), James L. Bildner, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant,hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               This report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

2.               The information contained in this reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the registrant.

 
| Dated:  August 1, 2003 |   | /s/ James L. Bildner                      |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | James L. Bildner, Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----