alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6558 

For the relief of Bernard Didier Pastor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2010 

Mr. DRIEHAUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Bernard Didier Pastor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR BERNARD 

4 DIDIER PASTOR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Bernard Didier Pastor shall be eligible for issuance 

8 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 

9 of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant 

11 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 

12 status to lawful permanent resident. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6558 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Bernard Didier 

2 Pastor enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Bernard Didier Pastor, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6558 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Bernard Didier Pastor 

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 14 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-01548-AKH Document 14 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                              Consent of KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
bigchalk.com, inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-99982, 333-48425, and 333-93099) on Form S-8 of Bell & Howell Company
of our report dated March 26, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of bigchalk.com, inc. and subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, equity (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended Decembrer 31, 2000,
which report appears in the fiscal 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Bell &
Howell Company.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 2001
Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bernard J. Zolnowski, Jr., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J. — insur*1010anee fraud, first degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 5 of 5
#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
#### *In re*SWINEY, Robert Joseph

(MR 20954)

Taylorville, IL

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Robert Joseph Swiney is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Suspension effective October 11, 2006. Respondent Robert Joseph Swiney shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.
Order entered May 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01375-CR

WILLIE JAMES PITTS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-61758-I

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the appellant’s brief received on May 26, 2015 filed as of the date 

of this order.

The clerk’s record does not contain the trial court’s jury charge on guilt or the verdict 

form. The Court notes that on October 15, 2014, the trial court ordered that the verdict 

containing the jury foreman’s name and signature was not to be publicly available on the District 

Clerk’s case management system. The documents, however, must be included in the record on 

appeal.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within 

FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing the trial court’s 

charge on guilt and the jury’s verdict. We further ORDER that the District Clerk take the
necessary precautions to file the supplemental record containing those documents in accordance 

with the trial court’s October 15, 2014 order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Don Adams, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 2; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and 

to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
#### *In re*YAKER, Bradford Thomas

(MR 21783)

Bingham Farms, MI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Bradford Thomas Yaker, who has been disciplined in the State of Michigan, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Illinois for 18 months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Michigan. Suspension effective October 9, 2007. Respondent Bradford Thomas Yaker shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I,Laura J. Neumann, Senior Director of Financial Reporting and Compliance ofArden Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Company), hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge (1) theannual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 3, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | /s/LAURA  J. NEUMANN          |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Laura  J. Neumann             |
|   | Title: | Senior  Director of Financial |
|   |   | Reporting  and Compliance     |
|   | Date:  | March 16, 2009           |
|        |        |                               |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

        CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of W. R. Grace &
Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul J. Norris
---------------------------
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert M. Tarola
---------------------------
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 5, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ID-070-1020-PG]


Resource Advisory Council Meeting; Upper Snake River District

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Upper Snake River District Resource Advisory Council Meeting: 
Locations and Times.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C., the 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) meeting of 
the Upper Snake River District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will be 
held as indicated below. The agenda for this two-day meeting is as 
follows: A tour of the North Rim project near Twin Falls, Idaho will be 
held for RAC members on the first day. The second day will include 
discussions on the Shoshone Land Use Plan Amendment, Craters of the 
Moon National Monument planning, and issues surrounding the Goose Creek 
Allotment. Additional items that may be scheduled (depending on time) 
include Fire Restoration, information on the State of Idaho Federal 
Lands Task Force, and information on BLM Off-Highway Vehicle Planning 
in Idaho. The agenda may change as issues warrant between publication 
of this notice and the meeting.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
or oral comments to the council. Each formal council meeting will have 
a time allocated for hearing public comments. Individuals who plan to 
attend and need further information about the meetings, or need special 
assistance such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations should contact David Howell at the Upper Snake River 
District Office, 1405 Hollipark Dr., Idaho Falls, ID 83401, or 
telephone (208) 524-7559.

DATES AND TIMES: The meeting will be held May 30-31, 2001 at the 
Herrett Center on the College of Southern Idaho campus in Twin Falls. 
An executive session of the RAC will begin at 1 p.m., and the full RAC 
meeting will begin at 2 p.m. The meeting will conclude no later than 3 
p.m. the following day. Public comments, if any, will be scheduled from 
8:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. on May 31, 2001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Resource Advisory Council 
is to advise the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a 
variety of planning and management issues associated with the 
management of the of the public lands.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Howell, Upper Snake River 
District, 1405 Hollipark Dr., Idaho Falls, ID 83401, (208) 524-7559.

    Dated: April 2, 2001.
James E. May,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-10916 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
### NUM BER 13-0 7-00 741- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I - E DI NBURG RIC A RD O VA REL A

D ORIA , A pp ellan t,

v . TH E STA

TE OF T EXAS, A pp ellee

. On ap pe al f rom th e 9 3rd Dist rict C ou rt of H ida lgo C ou nty , T exas . 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re C hie f J us tice Vald ez an d Ju stice s Ro drig ue z an d Garza

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Ri cardo Varela D or ia, att empts to ap peal hi s conv ic ti on for ag g ra v ated sex ual as saul t. The tr ial co urt has ce rt ified t h at t his “ is a pl ea- barg ain ca se, and the def end anthas NO rig ht of app eal.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25 .2(a)(2).2

This ca se w as prev iou sl y abat ed and re manded to the tr ial cour t on Ma y 15, 2008, and M ar ch 26, 2 009, for th e pur poses of obtai nin g a t ri al cour t c erti ficat ion

. On J une 15, 200 9, th e trial court app ointe d new cou nsel for a ppe llant and in structe d coun sel to ob tain a tr ial co urt c erti ficat ion

. O n A ug ust3, 2009, thi s C our t recei v ed an A n de r

s ’ br ief and moti on for extens ion of ti me to file pro s e br ief. A s u p p le m e n ta l cle rk ’s record fil ed on Aug ust10, 2009, cont ain s a cert ific ati on that “i s a plea- barg ain case, and the defendant has NO rig ht of

app eal.” On A ug ust24, 2009, appoi nted couns el filed a j ur is dic ti onal br ief and moti on for lea v e to w it hdraw , s tati ng thatthi s C our t l ack s j ur is dicti on based on the tr ial cour t c erti ficat ion

. The Tex as Rul es of Appel lat e Proc edure prov ide that an appeal mustbe d is mis sed if the tri a l c o urt’s certif ication doe s not sho w thatthe de fend anthas the rig ht of app eal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25. 2(d); se e T EX . R. A PP . P. 37

. 1 , 4 4 .3, 4 4.4 . Accordin gly , this app eal is DI SM ISSE D. An y

pendi ng moti ons are di smi ss ed as moot.

P E RC U R I A M Do not p ubl is h. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 .2(b). Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s 2 4th d ay

of September , 200 9.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his
capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Colombia Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)          The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date: August 17, 2012 |  | /s/ Brian L. Miller                                    | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                      |  | Brian L. Miller                                        | 
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal
 Financial Officer) |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2015 

# Order

September 2 3 , 2015

152179 ( 14)(16 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

FRANKLIN DAJUAN

- WARRE ANDERSON

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 152179

COA: 327177

Wayne CC: 13

- 009902

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion and amended motion of defendant

appellant to file a supplemental application for leave to appeal are GRANTED. The

supplemental application submitted on September 9, 2015, is accepted for filing.
# When Is an Incident Not an Incident?

**Posted: Dec. 17, 2020**

            -   Find similar NFIRSGrams:
            - Basic Module

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

The National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) is an all incident reporting system, meaning that you can utilize NFIRS to report all emergencies to which your department responds. However, some fire department activities should not be reported to NFIRS. This NFIRSGram helps fire departments to determine which activities are not reported to NFIRS.

## Important points

              -  Utilize NFIRS to report your emergency responses.
              -  Do not use NFIRS to report parades, code inspections and training events.
              -  Do report smoke detector installations and community paramedicine visits.

After a fire department responds to an emergency incident, department personnel complete an NFIRS report documenting what they found in the course of their activities. Fire departments use the NFIRS report to document their response to an emergency, whether or not the fire department finds an emergency upon arrival.

While NFIRS does capture some nonemergency incidents, such as service calls, you should not use the NFIRS report to document scheduled events such as parades, code inspections or department training. Documenting activities of that nature is accomplished by other means, especially if participation in those activities counts toward some type of length of service award program for the members of the fire department.

## Examples of activities to report and not to report

### Emergency calls

####  Report

                - All fires
                - Vehicle accidents
                - EMS and rescue incidents
                - Hazardous materials incidents
                - Severe weather emergencies
                - Overpressure ruptures / Explosions
                - False alarms / False calls

### Nonemergency calls

####  Report

                - Service calls
                - Good intent calls
                - Smoke detector installations
                - Community paramedicine

####  Do not report

                - Parades
                - Training
                - Fire prevention events
                - Stand by at sporting events
                - Code inspections

For more information about NFIRS, please contact the NFIRS Support Center: Monday – Friday between 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. ET, at 888-382-3827 or by email at fema-nfirshelp@fema.dhs.gov.
Case 1:07-cv-05728-RJS-DCF Document 55-27 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05728-RJS-DCF Document 55-27 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00284

- CV

Willie Jackson

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1 271968D )

June 5 , 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

S ECO ND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
1

The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United States District Judge for the District

of North Dakota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3254

___________

L. David Ormerod, M.D., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Western District of Missouri.

Curators of the University of Missouri, *

Richard L. Wallace, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Jack M. Colwill, M.D., and *

John W. Cowden, M.D., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: March 12, 2004

Filed: May 21, 2004

___________

Before RILEY and MELLOY, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSON,1

 District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.
2

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

-2-

L. David Ormerod (Dr. Ormerod) appeals the dismissal of his civil rights

action. The district court2

 found that his claim was barred by the Eleventh

Amendment. We affirm. 

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Treleven v. Univ. of

Minn., 73 F.3d 816, 817 (8th Cir. 1996). We will affirm if the record shows that there

is no genuine issue of material fact and that the prevailing party is entitled to

judgment as a matter of law. Id. (quoting Maitland v. Univ. of Minn., 43 F.3d 357,

360 (8th Cir. 1994)).

The University of Missouri hired Dr. Ormerod in 1996 as an associate

professor of opthalmology. When the university terminated his employment, he

brought a section 1983 suit against the university, Richard Wallace, Jack Colwill, and

John Cowden. Wallace is the chancellor for the University of Missouri’s Columbia

campus, Colwill was the interim dean for the school of medicine, and Cowden chairs

the medical school’s department of opthalmology. Dr. Ormerod alleged that his due

process rights were violated when the university failed to review his grievances and

the university denied him consideration for tenure.

Defendants brought a motion for summary judgment arguing that the Eleventh

Amendment to the United States Constitution granted them immunity from this suit

seeking monetary damages. The district court noted that previous decisions had

established that the University of Missouri-Columbia was entitled to Eleventh

Amendment immunity. The court stated that it was unnecessary to evaluate whether

the university was still entitled to immunity because Dr. Ormerod had not shown any

change in the university’s circumstances. The court therefore granted the motion for

summary judgment as to the university.
-3-

The court also granted summary judgment as to the defendants Wallace,

Colwill, and Cowden. The parties agreed that these three defendants were acting at

all relevant times as agents of the University of Missouri-Columbia. Dr. Ormerod did

not clearly specify in his complaint that he was suing them in their individual

capacities. Therefore, these defendants were also entitled to Eleventh Amendment

immunity.

For the reasons given in the district court’s opinion, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________