alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. '1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Briazz, Inc.(the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Victor D. Alhadeff,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



                                                      /s/ Victor D. Alhadeff
                                                      ----------------------
                                                      Victor D. Alhadeff
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      August 13, 2002
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Alan E. Casnoff, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of DVL, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of DVL, Inc.


Date: March 31, 2005                              By: /s/ Alan E. Casnoff
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name:  Alan E. Casnoff
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer

      I, Jay Thailer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of DVL, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly represents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of DVL, Inc.


Date: March 31, 2005                              By: /s/ Jay Thailer
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name:  Jay Thailer
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

                                       OF

                        LAZARE KAPLAN INTERNATIONAL INC.



I, Leon Tempelsman, Vice Chairman of the Board and President of Lazare Kaplan
International Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)    the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002
       (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
       with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
       Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)    information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Lazare Kaplan International Inc.

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is
not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.

Dated: August 28, 2002


                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Leon Tempelsman
                                                   (Chief Executive Officer)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 05, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 05, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0090. IN THE INTEREST OF H. P. et al., CHILDREN (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 14416J126 14416J127 14416J128
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000147

26-FEB-2014

07:45 AM
**USFF Band Menu**

                    - USFF Band Home
                    - USFF Band Leadership
                    - Performing Ensembles
                    - Upcoming Schedule
                    - U.S. Navy Fleet Band Auditions
                    - Contact USFF Band

**U.S. Navy Fleet Band Auditions**

----

U.S. Navy Fleet Bands seek highly qualified musicians to serve in nine fleet bands around the world. Being a Navy musician is an excellent way to perform professionally while serving as an active duty Sailor. There are also many benefits for you and your family, such as the Student Loan Repayment Program (up to $65,000), full medical and dental benefits, competitive salary, the Post 9/II G.I. Bill, travel, vacation time and more.The Navy Music audition supervisor has the most up-to-date information about our current vacancies​ and audition procedures. For more information about your instrument and audition requirements, please visit https://www.navyband.navy.mil/auditions.html. You can also call 901-874-4316 or send an email to NavyMusicAuditions@navy.mil.

 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY MACK BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (CR-94-27; CA-03-536-7)

Submitted: January 19, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Mack Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Mack Brown, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-

38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion to file

a pro se supplemental brief and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# 12301(d) Benefits NN vs NE
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

LUIS PILLCO and ANA LUCERO,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-4508-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 23 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 14, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-04508-AKH Document 23 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telecommunications Income Fund XI
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Leasing,
Inc., General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


May 8, 2003                                 /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas J. Berthel
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher & Company
                                                 Leasing, Inc.
                                                 General Partner
                                                 Telecommunications Income
                                                 Fund XI, L.P.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


December 5, 2019


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 455 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:




The Bank of New
York Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”)
included in the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the
Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on
December 4, 2019, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust
and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of
the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-233800) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with
respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit
thereto.






	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
# CE2010087EN.01033201.xml

| 1.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 87/332 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 87/332

---

Wednesday 11 March 2009VAT exemption on the final importation of certain goods (codified version) *

P6_TA(2009)0101

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2009 on the proposal for a Council directive determining the scope of Article 143(b) and (c) of Directive 2006/112/EC as regards exemption from value added tax on the final importation of certain goods on the common system of value added tax (codified version) (COM(2008)0575 – C6-0347/2008 – 2008/0181(CNS))

2010/C 87 E/49

(Consultation procedure – codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2008)0575),

having regard to Articles 93 and 94 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0347/2008),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 – Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0060/2009),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> DOLLAR

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          85,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  211,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,200
<INVENTORY>                                    130,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               592,400
<PP&E>                                       1,524,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (902,600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,411,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          691,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           700
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,411,400
<SALES>                                      1,090,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,118,400
<CGS>                                          635,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  635,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                128,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,700
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11


</TABLE>
# C_2009031EN.01001401.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/14

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 31/09)

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Canary Islands (Gran Canaria-Tenerife North and South, Gran Canaria-Fuerte Ventura, Lanzarote, El Hierro, Tenerife North and South-La Gomera-La Palma, La Palma-Lanzarote) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | Date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Dirección General de Aviación Civil |
| Sudireción General de Transporte Aéreo |
| Area de Explotación |
| Tel.: (34-91) 59 77 505 |
| Fax (34-91) 59 78 643 |
| E-mail: mmederos@fomento.es |

Member State

Spain

Concerned route

Canary Islands (Gran Canaria-Tenerife North and South, Gran Canaria-Fuerte Ventura, Lanzarote, El Hierro, Tenerife North and South-La Gomera-La Palma, La Palma-Lanzarote)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

Date of publication of this notice

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Dirección General de Aviación Civil

Sudireción General de Transporte Aéreo

Area de Explotación

Tel.: (34-91) 59 77 505

Fax (34-91) 59 78 643

E-mail: mmederos@fomento.es

---
#### MESSERSCHMITT, Respondent, v. TRAVELERS’ INS. CO. OF HARTFORD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Henry H. Messerschmitt against the Travelers' Insurance Company of Hartford.

No> opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed.
#### Lucas BUDIONO, a.k.a. Lu Han Hong, a.k.a. Budiono Lucas, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72223.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2011.*

Filed April 13, 2011.

Houman Varzandeh, VHF Law Group, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Lindsay Elizabeth Williams, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, CAS-District Counsel, Esquire, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lucas Budiono, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and review for substantial evidence factual findings. *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

*669Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Budiono failed to establish it is more likely than not that he will be tortured in Indonesia by or with the acquiescence of a public official or other individual acting in an official capacity. *See Wakkary,*558 F.3d at 1068.

Further, the record does not compel the conclusion that Budiono experienced harms in Indonesia that rise to the level of past persecution. *See Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2003); *Wakkary,*558 F.3d at 1059-60. However, in analyzing Budiono’s fear of future persecution, the agency did not apply the disfavored group analysis set forth in *Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir.2004). In light of this and our intervening decisions in *Tampubolon v. Holder,*610 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir.2010), and *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir.2009), we remand for the agency to assess Budiono’s asylum and withholding of removal claims under the disfavored group analysis in the first instance. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 40 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 40 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 40 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3