alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009064EN.01001801.xml

| 19.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/18

---

Update of model cards issued by the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of Member States to accredited members of diplomatic missions and consular representations and members of their families, as referred to in Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 85; OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 15)

(2009/C 64/07)

The publication of Model cards issued by the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of Member States to accredited members of diplomatic missions and consular representations and members of their families, as referred to in Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the commission in conformity with Article 34 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a monthly update is available on the website of Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security.

MALTA

| 1. | Issued to heads of mission, members of the mission having diplomatic rank and their spouses and their children aged between 18 and 21 forming part of their respective households |
| --- | --- |

1.

Image

Issued to heads of mission, members of the mission having diplomatic rank and their spouses and their children aged between 18 and 21 forming part of their respective households

| 2. | Issued to administrative and technical staff members of the mission as well as to their spouses and their children aged between 18 and 21 forming part of their respective households |
| --- | --- |

2.

Image

Issued to administrative and technical staff members of the mission as well as to their spouses and their children aged between 18 and 21 forming part of their respective households

| 3. | Issued to members of international organisations approved by the Government of Malta as well as to their spouses as well as their children between 18 and 21 forming part of their respective households |
| --- | --- |

3.

Image

Issued to members of international organisations approved by the Government of Malta as well as to their spouses as well as their children between 18 and 21 forming part of their respective households

| 4. | Issued to Honorary Consular Officers of foreign countries in Malta |
| --- | --- |

4.

Image

Issued to Honorary Consular Officers of foreign countries in Malta

| 5. | Issued to Maltese Honorary Consuls |
| --- | --- |

5.

Image

Issued to Maltese Honorary Consuls

---
#### Jo-Cook Realty Corp., Appellant, v Bernd Lorge et al., al., Respondents.

— In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated July 9, 1986, which after a nonjury trial, dismissed its complaint and denied its posttrial motion to conform the pleadings to the proof.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Assuming, arguendo, that it was improper for the trial court to deny the plaintiffs motion to conform the pleadings to the proof which tended to show that a previously rescinded written contract between the parties had been orally renewed, the defendants raised the affirmative defense of the Statute of Frauds with respect to the alleged oral contract. The bar of the Statute of Frauds having been interposed, the court could not find that the purported oral contract between the parties to sell real property was valid *(see,*General Obligations Law § 5-703 [2]). Nor should the defendants be equitably estopped from denying that a valid contract existed under the facts of this case *(see, Huggins v Castle Estates,*36 NY2d 427, 433). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
-53-

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     Year Ended July 31,
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                        1998             1999              2000               2001             2002
                                                      -------          -------          ---------           -------          -------
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>               <C>                <C>              <C>
Earnings
  Income before cumulative effect
    of change in accounting  principle                $46,510          $61,271            $60,507           $34,206          $12,878
  Income tax provision                                 23,960           29,745             35,536            20,091            6,343
                                                      -------          -------          ---------           -------          -------
    Earnings                                           70,470           91,016             96,043            54,297           19,221
                                                      -------          -------          ---------           -------          -------

Fixed Charges
  Interest expense                                        254            1,772             21,169            22,195           16,255

  Portion of rental expense
   representative of interest factor                      701              705              1,113             2,082            3,030
                                                      -------          -------          ---------           -------          -------
      Fixed charges                                       955            2,477             22,282            24,277           19,285
                                                      -------          -------          ---------           -------          -------

Capitalized interest                                       --               --               (580)               --               --
                                                      -------          -------          ---------           -------          -------

Earnings before income tax
  provision and fixed charges                         $71,425          $93,493           $117,745           $78,574          $38,506
                                                      =======          =======          =========           =======          =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      74.8x            37.7x               5.3x              3.2x             2.0x
                                                      =======          =======          =========           =======          =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Medical Dynamics, Inc. on Form S-3 and Form S-8 of our report dated November 30,
2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Medical
Dynamics, Inc. as of September 30, 2000, and for the years ended September 30,
2000 and 1999, which report is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts."



By: /s/ HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP
-----------------------------
HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP

Denver, Colorado
December 19, 2000
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6478 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear for men covering 

the ankle. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2010 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear 

for men covering the ankle. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR FOR MEN COV4 ERING THE ANKLE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6478 IH

‘‘ 9902.64.01 Work footwear for men 

with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, incorporating a protective toe 

cap of materials other 

than metal, covering the 

ankle, but not higher than 

6′′ (provided for in subheading 6403.91.60.10) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2012 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwayne TAYLOR, a/k/a D, a/k/a Dwayne Elliott Taylor, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6070.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: April 30, 2013.

Dwayne Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*189PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 11


                              EQUITABLE OF IOWA COMPANIES
                     Consolidated Net Income Per Share Computation

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Year ended December 31                  1996             1995             1994
_______________________________________________________________________________
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                               <C>              <C>              <C>
PRIMARY:

  Net income                        $123,161          $84,890          $98,284
                                 ==============================================
  Average shares outstanding      31,904,734       31,709,032       31,612,675
                                 ==============================================
  Net income per share                 $3.86            $2.68            $3.11
                                 ==============================================

FULLY DILUTED:

  Net income                        $123,161          $84,890          $98,284
                                 ==============================================
  Average shares outstanding      31,904,734       31,709,032       31,612,675

  Add:  Net effect of dilutive
        stock options - based on
        the treasury stock method
        using year-end market price,
        if higher than average
        market price                 539,325          381,726          591,980
                                 ______________________________________________
  Total                           32,444,059       32,090,758       32,204,655
                                 ==============================================
  Net income per share                 $3.80            $2.65            $3.05
                                 ==============================================
<FN>
Note:  This computation is required by Regulation S-K Item 601 and is filed as
       an exhibit under Item 14a(3) of Form 10-K.  Fully diluted earnings per
       share calculated above has not been presented on the face of the
       company's Consolidated Statements of Income because dilution is less
       than three percent and, therefore, presentation is not required by
       Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15.
</TABLE>
Computation of Ratios
                             (Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                              ---------------------------------------------------------------------

                                               1992         1993       1994        1995        1996         1997
                                               ----         ----       ----        ----        ----         ----
<S>                                           <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>           <C>
Earnings:
Earnings before income taxes and
extraordinary items and cumulative effect
of accounting change                          $  2,093    $    910    $  1,775    $    551    ($   116)    ($ 9,217)
    Fixed Charges                                4,936       4,753       5,604       6,512       8,596       11,111
                                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------     --------
Earnings ("E")                                $  7,029    $  5,663    $  7,379    $  7,063    $  8,480     $  1,894
                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========     ========

Fixed Charges:
    Interest Expense                             4,278       4,016       4,946       5,978       7,553       10,299
    Preferred Dividends Requirements                65         195         325         262         592          592
    Imputed interest on operating lease
      obligations expense interest                 593         542         333         272         452          221
                                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------     --------

Fixed charges ("FC")                          $  4,936    $  4,753    $  5,604    $  6,512    $  8,596     $ 11,111
                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========     ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (E/FC)         1.42        1.19        1.32        1.08        0.99         0.17
                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========     ========

Deficiency of earnings available to cover
   fixed charges                                   N/A         N/A         N/A         N/A    ($   116)    ($ 9,217)
                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========     ========
</TABLE>
* John T. Boyd, Chief Justi ce (Re t.), Sev enth Court of Ap peals, sitting by

assignment
. NO. 07-02-0405 -CR NO. 07-02-0406 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L E DECEM BER 10, 2002

______________________________ TIMOTHY LEE PHILLIPS, JR., AP PELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 18 1ST DISTR ICT COURT OF POTT ER COUNTY; NOS. 39,608-B& 39,434-B; HONORAB LE JOHN B OARD, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J. * ABA TEMENT AND REMA ND2

Following ordersof the trial court adjudicating him guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly w

eapon in cause nu m ber 39,6 08-B and burglary of a building in cause number 39,43 4-B, appellant Timothy Lee Ph illi ps, Jr. filed pro se notices of appeal. Both thetrial court clerk and court reporter filed and were g ranted extens ions of tim e in which to f

ile th eir records due to nonpaym ent. Considering appellant’s incarceration and pro se sta tu s, we now abate the appeal and remand the cause to the tri al court for further proce edings. Upon rem and the trial court shall imm ediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determ ine the following: 1. whet her appellant desires to prosecute these appeals; and 2. whether a ppellant is indi ge nt and e ntitled to appointed counsel and preparation of a clerk’s record and a reporter’ s record. The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determ ined th at appellant does wa nt to continue these appeals and is indigent, then the trial courtsha ll also take such m easures as m ay be necessary to assure appellant effe c tive assi stance of counsel, which m ay include the appointment of new couns el. If n ew cou nse l is appointed, the nam e, address, telephonenum ber, and state bar num ber of said counsel sha ll be included in the order appointing new counsel. Finally, the trial cou rt s hall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law , and such orders asthe court m ayenter regarding the aforem entione d issues, and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included3

in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental records with the Clerk of this Court by M onday, February 10, 2003. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
DOCSNY-271815v01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

BOGUSLAW KWASNIAK AND 

MALGORZATA KWASNIAK, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

100 CHURCH, LLC et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05300-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 October 3, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 19 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009105EN.01003001.xml

| 7.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/30

---

STATE AID — POLAND

STATE AID — POLAND

(Articles 87 to 89 of the Treaty establishing the European Community)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty — Withdrawal of notification

State aid C 47/2008 (ex N 270/08) — Restructuring aid to Przędzalnia Zawiercie, Poland

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 105/06

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty, initiated on 10 December 2008 in respect of the measure referred to above, recording that Poland has withdrawn its notification on 19 January 2009 and will not pursue this aid project further.

---
Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of United Tennessee
Bankshares,   Inc.  I,  Chris  H.  Triplett,   Controller  of  United  Tennessee
Bankshares,  Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.



Date: May 10, 2004                              /s/ Chris H. Triplett
     -----------------                          --------------------------------
                                                Chris H. Triplett
                                                Controller
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05739-KMK Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 22-5      Filed 03/26/2008     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 22-5      Filed 03/26/2008     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 22-5      Filed 03/26/2008     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 22-5      Filed 03/26/2008     Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5