alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,877
<SECURITIES>                                    16,705
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                       389
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,220
<PP&E>                                           5,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,625
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,417
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,169
<SALES>                                         41,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,599
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,632
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,632
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
1

COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY

OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

____________

C.C.D. No. 18-01

____________

IN RE: COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

____________

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

J.C. No. 02-17-90118

____________

(Filed April 17, 2018)

Present: Judges Anthony J. Scirica, Chair, Sarah Evans Barker, Joel F. Dubina, Joel M. 

Flaum, Thomas F. Hogan, Jon O. Newman, and Kathryn H. Vratil.

____________

ORDER

____________

On February 5, 2018, the Judicial Council of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second 

Circuit issued an order (attached herewith) concluding a judicial misconduct proceeding against

former Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit based on 

his retirement under 28 U.S.C. § 371(a). See Judicial Council Order at 2 (“Because Alex 

Kozinski has resigned the office of circuit judge, and can no longer perform any judicial duties, 

he does not fall within the scope of persons who can be investigated under the Act”). The Second 

Circuit Judicial Council “acknowledge[d] the importance of ensuring that governing bodies with 

clear jurisdiction are aware of the complaint” in light of “the seriousness of the conduct alleged,”

and requested that “the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference 

of the United States forward a copy of [the] order to any relevant Congressional committees for 

their information.” Id. at 4.
2

Given the seriousness of the underlying allegations of judicial misconduct, we agree with 

this course of action. Although the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability has not 

received a petition for review in this matter, the Committee is satisfied that it has authority to 

forward a copy of the Second Circuit Judicial Council’s order to the House of Representatives 

Judiciary Committee chairman and ranking minority member, with a copy to the Speaker and 

minority leader, for their information. This Committee’s transmission of the Second Circuit 

Judicial Council’s order does not imply what action, if any, the Congress or its relevant 

committees should take.
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-11 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-11 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-11 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-11 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-11 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 712 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 712

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
 to require in the annual report of each defined benefit pension plan 
             disclosure of plan investments in hedge funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2009

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
 to require in the annual report of each defined benefit pension plan 
             disclosure of plan investments in hedge funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pension Security Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE IN ANNUAL REPORT OF INVESTMENTS IN HEDGE FUNDS BY 
              DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 103(b) of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1023(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)(C), by striking ``value;'' and 
        inserting ``value, including, in the case of a defined benefit 
        pension plan, a separate schedule identifying each hedge fund 
        (as defined in paragraph 5) in which amounts held for 
        investment under the plan are invested as of the end of the 
        plan year covered by the annual report and the amount so 
        invested in such hedge fund;''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(5) For purposes of paragraph (3)(C), the term `hedge fund' means 
an unregistered investment pool permitted under sections 3(c)(1) and 
3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(1), 
(7)) and section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77d(2)) 
and Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(17 CFR 230.506).''.
    (b) Effective Date; Regulations.--The amendments made by subsection 
(a) shall apply with respect to annual reports for plan years beginning 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. The Secretary of 
Labor, in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
shall issue initial regulations to carry out the amendments made by 
subsection (a) not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Colombia Clean Power & Fuels, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 15, 2011

/s/ Edward P. MooneyEdward P. MooneyChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-05732-GBD     Document 2      Filed 06/15/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-9 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-9 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-9 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-4389]


Raider Apparel Inc. Alma, Georgia; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
December 14, 2000 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers 
at Raider Apparel Inc., Alma, Georgia.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
remains in effect (NAFTA-3103). Consequently, further investigation in 
this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-10943 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Form 10-K of Southern Union Company (the “Company”) for the
        year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George L. Lindemann, Chairman
        of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) **** of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except as otherwise noted under
        Item 9A therein, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
 
  /s/
        GEORGE L. LINDEMANN
 George
        L.
        Lindemann
 Chairman
        of the Board, President and
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 March
        16,
        2006
  
  This
        Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
        incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
        Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
        whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
        general incorporation language contained in such filing.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
        the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-930-1310-01; OKNM 101622]


New Mexico: Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Lease

    Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease OKNM 101622 for lands in Leflore 
County, Oklahoma, was timely filed and was accompanied by all required 
rentals and royalties accruing from December 1, 2000, the date of 
termination.
    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has 
agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 
per acre or fraction thereof and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The 
lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and has reimbursed 
the Bureau of Land Management for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice.
    The Lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the 
lease as set out in sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act 
of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing 
to reinstate the lease effective December 1, 2000, subject to the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria S. Baca, BLM, New Mexico State 
Office, (505) 438-7566.

    Dated: April 19, 2001.
Gloria S. Baca,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 01-10913 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH     Document 19      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH     Document 19      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH     Document 19      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.  SUBSIDIARIES

Checkpoint Systems, S.A. - Argentina
Checkpoint Meto Australia Pty. Ltd. - Australia
Meto Australia Pty. Ltd. - Australia
Checkpoint Systems G.m.b.H - Austria
Actron Belgium and Luxemborg N.V. - Belgium
Checkpoint Europe N.V. - Belgium
Checkpoint Systems Belgium N.V. - Belgium
D & D Security N.V. - Belgium
Meto N.V. - Belgium
Checkpoint do Brasil Ltda. - Brazil
Checkpoint Caribbean Ltd. - Cayman Island
Checkpoint Canada, Inc. - Canada
Meto Canada, Inc. - Canada
Checkpoint Systems (CZ)s.r.o. - Czech Republic
Checkpoint Systems Danmark A/S - Denmark
Checkpoint Meto Finland OY. - Finland
Checkpoint Systems France S.A.S. - France
Checkpoint Systems G.m.b.H. - Germany
Checkpoint Systems Holding G.m.b.H. - Germany
Checkpoint Systems International G.m.b.H. - Germany
Checkpoint Systems Europe G.m.b.H.  - Germany
Checkpoint Systems Solutions G.m.b.H. - Germany
Checkpoint Systems Hong Kong Ltd. - Hong Kong
Checkpoint Systems Kft - Hungary
Checkpoint Systems India Pvt - India
Checkpoint Systems Italia S.p.A. - Italy
Checkpoint Systems Japan Co. Ltd. - Japan
Checkpoint Manufacturing Japan Co. Ltd. - Japan
UAB Checkpoint Vilnius - Lithuania
Checkpoint Systems (M) Sdn. Bhd. - Malaysia
Checkpoint Systems Sales (M) Sdn. Bhd. - Malaysia
Checkpoint de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. - Mexico
Checkpoint Holland Holding B.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint Holland Trading B.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint International Systems C.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint Meto Benelux B.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint Systems Europe B.V. - The Netherlands
ID Systems Europe B.V. - The Netherlands
ID Systems Productie B.V. - The Netherlands
Kimball Systems B.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint Systems Ltd. - New Zealand
Checkpoint Meto Norge A/S - Norway
Checkpoint Systems (CEE) Spolka z.o.o. - Poland
Checkpoint Portugal Sistemas Anti-Furto, S.A. - Portugal
Checkpoint Systems (SK) s.r.o.- Slovakia
Actron Sistemas De Seguidad S.A. - Spain
Checkpoint Systems Espana S.A.- Spain
Checkpoint Systems Sverige A.B. - Sweden
Turn-O-Matic International A.B. - Sweden
Checkpoint Export A.G. - Switzerland
Checkpoint Systems A.G. - Switzerland
Actron Group Ltd. - United Kingdom
Actron U.K. Ltd. - United Kingdom
Checkpoint Systems U.K. Ltd. - United Kingdom
Evagard Ltd. - United Kingdom
Meto U.K. Ltd. - United Kingdom
Checkpoint Caribbean, Inc. - USA
Checkpoint International LLC - USA
Checkpoint Security Systems Group, Inc. - USA
Checkpoint Systems, Inc. of Puerto Rico, Inc. - USA
# CE2010212EN.01012501.xml

| 5.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 212/125 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 212/125

---

Tuesday 5 May 2009Defence of the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi

P6_TA(2009)0338

European Parliament decision of 5 May 2009 on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi (2009/2020(IMM))

2010/C 212 E/22

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the request by Umberto Bossi for defence of his immunity in connection with an investigation which is currently being carried out by the Public Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Verbania District Court, of 19 February 2009, announced in plenary sitting of 9 March 2009,

having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964, 10 July 1986 and 21 October 2008 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,

1

having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0269/2009),

| 1. | Decides to defend the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to defend the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of its committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authorities of the Italian Republic. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of its committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authorities of the Italian Republic.

---

(1)  Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and Others [1986] ECR 2391 and Joined Cases C-200/07 and C-201/07 Marra v De Gregorio and Clemente, not yet reported.

1

Wagner

Fohrmann and Krier

Wybot

Faure and Others

Marra

De Gregorio and Clemente

---
Exhibit 15


R&B Falcon Corporation


     We are aware that R&B Falcon Corporation has incorporated by reference
in its  Registration Statements  No.  333-43475 and 333-63471 its Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998, which includes our  report  dated
November 4,  1998 covering  the  unaudited  interim  financial  information
contained therein.  Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933,
that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared
or certified by  our  firm or  a  report prepared  or certified by our firm
within the  meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/Arthur Andersen LLP

Houston, Texas
November 4, 1998
Re:
    
    Continuing Employment; Change in Control and Noncompetition Agreement
  Merger Agreement CIC Agreement
   Merger Agreement provided, however, Change in Control Date




---



##### 



Accelerated Vesting of Options and Other Equity-Based Awards




---



##### 



Very truly yoursBy:
    AMB Property III, LLC.,By:
    AMB Property, L.P., its managing member,By:
    AMB Property Corporation, its general partnerBy:
    /s/ Nancy J. HemmenwayNancy J. HemmenwaySenior Vice President, Human Resources Agreed to and acknowledged
as of the 30th day of January, 2011:/s/ Hamid R. Moghadam
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen O. West, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                           
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Stephen O. West                                                       
|    |  | Stephen O. West Chief Financial Officer, Vice President September 21, 2004
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-40135 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ULISES ALANIZ-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-1439-1

Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ulises Alaniz-Diaz raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which reaffirmed the holding in United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez , 319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir. 2003), that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not a n e l e m ent of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D August 21, 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-40135 Document: 00511964303 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012