alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of
DVL, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
   Date: March 31,
      2010
            
            /s/
      Alan Casnoff
              Alan Casnoff
              Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 31,
      2010
            
            /s/
      Neil Koenig
              Neil
      Koenig
                Chief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1

                             ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                               21 Corporate Drive
                             Clifton Park, NY 12065


May 11, 2005

Mr. Douglas A. McIntyre 33 Highview Road Pound Ridge, NY 10576

Dear Doug:

Reference is made to that Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") between you and
On2 Technologies, Inc. ("On2") dated as of April 17, 2000, as amended on July
23, 2003. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.

On2 hereby agrees to extend the Term for a period of one year. The term of the
extension (the "Extension Term") will commence on April 17, 2006 and expire on
April 16, 2007 at 5:00 P.M. New York City time. Beginning on April 17, 2006, the
Agreement shall be read so that the defined term "Term" means the Extension
Term.

Except as specifically modified herein, all of the terms and provisions set
forth in Agreement shall apply during the Extension Term.

Sincerely yours,

ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


BY: /s/ Tim Reusing
  --------------------------------------
  Name:  Tim Reusing
  Title: EVP- Legal and Business Affairs



/s/ Douglas A. McIntyre
----------------------------------------
Douglas A. McIntyre
Escuche el BIPdonde DUERME

¡Cada dormitorio necesita tener 

una alarma de incendios operativa! 

La mitad de las 

muertes provocadas 

por incendios 

residenciales 

ocurren entre las 

11 p.m. y las 7 a.m., 

cuando la mayoría 

de las personas 

están durmiendo. 

años	 

Para una 

mejor protección, 

instale alarmas 

interconectadas. 

Cuando una de ellas 

se activa, todas 

se activan.
 

Instale alarmas 

de humo en cada 

dormitorio, fuera de 

cada área separada 

para dormir, y en cada 

nivel de la vivienda, 

incluyendo el sótano.
 

Averigüe el 

funcionamiento de 

cada alarma 

mensualmente. 

Reemplace todas 

las alarmas de humo 

cada 10 años, o cuando 

no suenen al momento 

de una prueba. 

Los niños y los adultos 

mayores pueden necesitar 

ayuda para despertarse 

cuando suene una alarma 

de humo. 

Cuando suena una alarma 

de humo, salga y quédese 

afuera. Diríjase hasta el 

punto de reunión exterior que 

se haya designado. 

Llame 9-1-1 desde un 

teléfono celular o desde 

un teléfono de un vecino. 

Quédese afuera hasta que 

el departamento de 

bomberos indique que es 

seguro volver a la vivienda. 

www.usfa.fema.gov

www.nfpa.org.
**Exhibit 10.6**

**Summary of Board of Directors Compensation**

          The members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Tier Technologies, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in attending Board meetings.  In November 2003, the Board adopted a compensation plan for non-employee members of the Board, which became effective on January 28, 2004.  Under this plan, the Company pays each continuing non-employee member of the Board an annual retainer of $15,000, payable quarterly in arrears, and fees of $1,000 for each Board meeting attended and $500 for each Committee meeting attended.  In October 2004, the Board adopted a revision of this plan, which will become effective on February 8, 2005.  Pursuant to this revision, the Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable quarterly in arrears, and each member of the Audit Committeewill receive fees of $1,000 for each Audit Committee meeting attended. 

          Effective January 28, 2004, each non-employee member of the Board shall receive a grant, upon their initial election by the shareholders, or an annual grant, upon their re-election, as the case may be, of a fully vested option to purchase 20,000 shares of Class B Common Stock under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (the “1996 Plan”).  

          The exercise price of options granted to the directors is 100% of the fair market value of the Class B Common Stock on the date of the option grant.  Options granted to non-employee directors are typically fully vested on the date of grant.  The term of options granted to non-employees is ten years.  In the event of a merger of the Company with or into another corporation or a consolidation, acquisition of assets or other change-in-control transaction involving the Company, at the sole discretion of the Board and to the extent permitted by applicable law (i) any surviving corporation shall assume all stock awards under the 1996 Plan, or shall substitute similar stock awards for those outstanding under the 1996 Plan, (ii) the time during which such stock awards may be exercised shall be accelerated and the stock awards terminated if not exercised prior to such event, or (iii) such stockawards shall continue in full force and effect.
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH     Document 25      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH     Document 25      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH     Document 25      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following Committee Meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         Army Science Board (ASB), Objective Force Soldier.                    

*Date of Meeting:*                         May 16-17, 2001.                    

*Time of Meeting:*                         0800-1700 (both days).                    

*Place:*                         Fort Bragg, NC.                    

*Agenda:*                         The Army Science Board's (ASB) Summer Study on “Objective Force Soldier/Soldier Systems” will meet for panel discussions and report preparation (day one) and study-related site visits of Fort Bragg (day two). The first day of meetings (May 16) will be open to the public. The site visits, due to their classified portions, will be closed to the public  in accordance with section 552b(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C. Appendix 2, subsection 10(d). For further information, please contact Mr. Mike                               ( print page 22222)                            Hendricks, Lead Staff Assistant on 703-617-7048.                    

Wayne Joyner, 

Executive Assistant, Army Science Board.

[FR Doc. 01-11115 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10AA

                                2000 AMENDMENT TO

                        1990 LIQUI-BOX STOCK OPTION PLAN

WHEREAS, Liqui-Box Corporation ("Corporation") adopted the 1990 Liqui-Box
Stock Option Plan ("1990 Stock Option Plan");

WHEREAS, as required by the terms of the 1990 Stock Option Plan, no options
have been issued after February 9, 2000, although options issued before that
date remain outstanding;

WHEREAS, effective December 1, 1999, the Corporation adopted the Liqui-Box
Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan ("Deferred Compensation
Plan");

WHEREAS, participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan may elect to defer
any taxable income on the exercise of nonqualified stock options granted
under the 1990 Stock Option Plan by completing the appropriate section of the
"Deferral Notice" made available under the terms of the Deferred Compensation
Plan;

WHEREAS, subject to certain restrictions described in Section 14 of the 1990
Stock Option Plan, the Board retained the power to amend the 1990 Stock
Option Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, effective on the date approved by the Corporation's Board of
Directors, Section 8 of the 1990 Stock Option Plan is amended by the addition
of the following new paragraph:

Each Participant who also is a participant in the Liqui-Box Corporation
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan ("Deferred Compensation Plan") may elect
to defer recognition of any gain on the exercise of any Non-Qualified Stock
Option by (i) completing the appropriate section of the Deferral Notice made
available under the Deferred Compensation Plan and (ii) otherwise complying
with the rules and requirements imposed by the Deferred Compensation Plan. If
this election is made, any Common Shares acquired through the exercise of a
Non-Qualified Stock Option subject to this deferral will be distributed from
the trust associated with the Deferred Compensation Plan under the
distribution provisions established as part of the Deferred Compensation
Plan, including the requirement that the affected Common Shares be held and
distributed in that form.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of the Corporation has executed
this amendment to be effective as of September 26, 2000.

                                 LIQUI-BOX CORPORATION

                                 By:      /s/ C. William McBee
                                    -----------------------------------------

                                 Print Name:     C. William McBee
                                            ---------------------------------

                                 Title:   President & COO
                                       --------------------------------------


                                       14
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the Annual Report of GoldSpring, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Reseigh,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
9, 2010





/s/ Robert A. ReseighRobert
      A. ReseighChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2001 / Notices 22285

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900–0559]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Cemetery

Administration, Department of Veterans

Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995

(44 U.S.C., 3501 et seq.), this notice

announces that the National Cemetery

Administration (NCA), Department of

Veterans Affairs, has submitted the

collection of information abstracted

below to the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) for review and comment.

The PRA submission describes the

nature of the information collection and

its expected cost and burden; it includes

the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before June 4, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF

THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Denise

McLamb, Information Management

Service (045A4), Department of

Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue,

NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273–

8030, FAX (202) 273–5981 or e-mail

denise.mclamb@mail.va.gov. Please

refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–0559’’

in any correspondence.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title: State Cemetery Data, VA Form

40–0241.

OMB Control Number: 2900–0559.

Type of Review: Reinstatement,

without change, of a previously

approved collection for which approval

has expired.

Abstract: VA Form 40–0241 is used to

collect information regarding the

number of interments conducted at state

veterans’ cemeteries each year. This

information is necessary for budget and

oversight purposes.

An agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to a collection of information

unless it displays a currently valid OMB

control number. The Federal Register

Notice with a 60-day comment period

soliciting comments on this collection

of information was published on August

17, 2000, at pages 50276–50277.

Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal

Government.

Estimated Annual Burden: 65 hours.

Estimated Average Burden Per

Respondent: 60 minutes.

Frequency of Response: Annually.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

65.

Send comments and

recommendations concerning any

aspect of the information collection to

VA’s OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human

Resources and Housing Branch, New

Executive Office Building, Room 10235,

Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395–7613.

Please refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–

0559’’ in any correspondence.

Dated: April 20, 2001.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Donald L. Neilson,

Director, Information Management Service.

[FR Doc. 01–11058 Filed 5–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320–01–U
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ..................................................................... X 

WEISS, 

Plaintiff. 

CREEM, et al., 

t 11 USDC SDNY 11 1 I DOCUMENT 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 11 DOC #: i / 

TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

07 Civ. 57 1 2 (RMB)(MHD) 

Defendants. 

The above entitled action is referred to the designated Magistrate Judge for the following 

purpose(s): 

- General Pretrial (includes scheduling, X Consent under 28 U.S.C. fj636(c) for all 

discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, purposes (including trial) 

and settlement) 

Consent under 28 U. S .C. §636(c) for 

- Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute:* limited purpose (e.g., dispositive motion, 

preliminary injunction) 

Purpose: 

If referral is for discovery disputes when - Habeas Corpus 

the District Judge is unavailable, the time 

period of the referral: - Social Security 

- Settlement* 

Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring 

a Report and Recommendation) 

- Inquest After Default/Damages Hearing 

Particular Motion: 

All such motions: 

- - - - - - - 

* Do not check if already referred for general pretrial. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: New York, New York 

July 26,2007 

Richard M. Berman, U.S.D.J. 

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 10 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR     Document 62      Filed 08/27/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 51-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 51-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 48 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 2 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 3 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 4 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 5 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 6 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 7 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 8 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 9 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 15      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 10 of 10
<PAGE>

December 1, 2000

                                                                      Exhibit 15

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated May 11, 2000, except as to Note 2 which is as
of December 1, 2000, on our review of interim financial information of W. R.
Grace & Co. (the "Company") as of and for the period ended March 31, 2000 and
included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter then
ended is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-37024, 333-49083, 333-49507, 333-49509, 333-49511, 333-49513,
333-49515, 333-49517, 333-49703, and 333-49705).

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
(August 31, 1987)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Giles Wade, Petitioner, v Carl D. Berry, as Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Application, pursuant to CPLR 7002 (b) (2), for writ of habeas corpus denied *(see, People ex rel. Davis v Coombe,*97 AD2d 667). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#                                                                         Navy Expeditionary Forces Secure the Operating Environment  Across the Competition Continuum                                                                    

##### by Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Public Affairs

12 April 2021VIRGINIA BEACH, Va.  -- 

                Official command seal of Navy Expeditionary Combat Command            

                NAVY EXPEDITIONARY COMBAT COMMAND SEAL-Final            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: NECC Public Affairs

VIRIN: 201029-N-BJ275-1001

Tags:
**NECC**NECF**NECC15**NEIC**INTELLIGENCE

Terms:
**Capabilities and Communities
#### Bernice Richard, Appellant, v Rosenman & Colin, Respondent.

Appeal from the orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on October 28, 1986 and November 4, 1988, respectively, is withdrawn, in accordance with the stipulation of the parties herein dated July 21, 1989, without costs to either party. No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Joel Garson et al., Respondents, v Adele H. Cohen, Appellant, and Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondent.

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Adele H. Cohen as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1989, for the public office of Member of the City Council for the 33rd Councilmanic District for the City of New York, the appeal is from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated August 7, 1989, which granted the application, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated August 14, 1989, entered upon the order.

*719Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the application is denied and the Board of Elections is directed to place the name of Adele H. Cohen on the appropriate ballot.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the proceeding *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 550 [a] [1]).

Adele H. Cohen submitted a petition designating her as a candidate for the Democratic Party primary election for the public office of Member of the City Council for the 33rd Councilmanic District for the City of New York. The petition contained three volumes purporting to contain 4,358 signatures. The cover sheets of each volume stated that only 4,034 of those signatures were of voters within the district. In addition, each cover sheet stated the number of such signatures which wére in the particular volume.

The Supreme Court held that the inclusion by Cohen of the out-of-district signatures and the failure to state exactly where in the volumes the out-of-district signatures could be located were sufficient to disqualify her. We disagree.

We find that there was no fraud or deception on the part of Cohen. While we disapprove of the inclusion of out-of-district signatures, which do not count toward designation, Cohen’s cover sheet clearly stated that these signatures were in fact included. Cohen otherwise complied with the essential requirements of the Election Law and any error was inconsequential *(see, Matter of Jonas v Black,*104 AD2d 466; *cf., Matter of Pecoraro v Mahoney,*65 NY2d 1026; *Matter of Catucci v Marchi,*143 AD2d 59, *lv denied*72 NY2d 914).

We have considered the petitioners’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Eiber, Spatt, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.