alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of One Horizon Group, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Martin Ward, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Finance
and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.



Date:  April 19, 2016



|/s/ Martin Ward                                                                | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Martin Ward                                                                    | 
|Chief Financial Officer, Principal Finance and Accounting Officer and Director
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 38 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 38 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 38 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 38 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 38 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 38 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the 1933 Act
      Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-172328) and Amendment No. 720 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible
      payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 3, 2019
Exhibit 4.1


 





English translation for reference purposes only.




 


	 	[COMPANY'S NAME], S.A. DE C.V.	 
	 	 	 
	 	[Variable Capital]	 
	 	 	 
	SHARE CERTIFICATE:	[Certificate number]	COVERS:	[Number of shares]
	 	 	 	 
	MINIMUM FIXED CAPITAL:	[Amount of fixed capital]	DOMICILE:	[Corporate Domicile]
	 	 	 	 
	VARIABLE CAPITAL :	[Amount of variable capital]	DURATION:	[Term]


 


This title certifies
that [shareholder's name], of [shareholder's nationality] nationality, with domicile in [address], Federal Taxpayers Registry number
[taxpayer registry number], owns [amount of shares] ordinary shares, nominative, without par value expression, Series [B], corresponding
to the participation of [shareholder's name], representing the variable part of the capital stock of [Company's name] (the ''Company'').


 


The Company was incorporated
by means of public deed number [notarial deed], granted on [date], before [Notary's Public Name], Notary Public number [1] of Mexico
City, and registered in the Public Registry of Commerce of Mexico City, in the commercial folio number [145852*1].


 


The shares represented
by this certificate are subject to the restrictions established in the by-laws including, without limitation, the restrictions
for transfers and encumbrances. Any transfer or encumbrance of shares in violation of the corporate by-laws or any of such agreements
shall be deemed for all purposes to be null and invalid, and no entry shall be made in the Company's share registry book or other
corporate books of the Company, unless the requirements of this restriction are observed.


 


Mexico City, December 2, 2019.


 


	______________________________	______________________________
	[Name]	[Name]
	Director	Director


 






    	 	 	1



     


    

 


English translation for reference purposes
only.


 


[Extract of Company's bylaws]


 






    	 	 	2
#### In the Matter of Joseph Shaw, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Harvey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

In November 1987, petitioner, an inmate at Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Ulster County, was charged with organizing actions against the facility and disobeying a direct order in violation of facility rules 104.12 and 106.10. Specifically, petitioner was charged with refusing a correction officer’s order to go into the "TV room or yard”, inciting other inmates to leave the television room and then encouraging them to chant "we don’t have to go inside the TV room if we don’t want to”. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges following a Tier III disciplinary hearing and punishment was imposed. This determination was affirmed upon administrative review and is the basis of this proceeding to review.

The determination must be confirmed. Petitioner initially claims that respondents violated their own regulations requiring that inmate misbehavior reports be filed or endorsed by all correction facility employees with "personal knowledge of the facts” (7 NYCRR 251-1.4 [b]). Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the record shows that only one facility employee witnessed the events in question and she is the one who issued the order that petitioner was found to have disobeyed. Since this was the only person with direct knowledge of the events, it was proper that hers was the only signature on the report. The other employees that petitioner claims should have signed the report arrived at the scene in response to all the commotion caused by the inmates gathered outside the television room following the alleged refusal of the order by petitioner.

Petitioner also claims that he received inadequate employee assistance at his hearing. The record reveals that the employee assistant performed all the services required under 7 *833NYCRR 251-4.2 and, in fact, petitioner expressed satisfaction with the help given to him by the assistant at the disciplinary hearing. Petitioner cannot complain that his assistant did only what petitioner requested him to do *(see, Matter of Gomez v Coughlin,*140 AD2d 902, 904). Despite petitioner’s contentions otherwise, there is no requirement in the applicable regulations that an employee assistant supply the Hearing Officer with written reports of witness interviews or discuss the case with the Hearing Officer. Even if petitioner had requested these services, he has failed to establish any prejudice resulting from this alleged deficiency *(see, Matter of Samuels v Kelly,*143 AD2d 506, *lv denied*73 NY2d 707).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applicants and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Initial Review Group Biomedical Research and Research 
Training Review Subcommittee A
    Date: June 12, 2001.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contract Person: Carole H. Latker, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Natcher 
Building, Room 1AS-13, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2848, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c303d2837392e3f1c32353b312f72323534723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a666b7e616f78694a64636d677924646362246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 30, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-11396 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-05733-SAS Document 5 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05733-SAS Document 5 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief Executive Officer and
Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      David G. DerrickDavid
      G. DerrickChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Michael G. ActonMichael
      G. ActonChief
      Financial Officer
   Dated:
May 18, 2009
  This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  36
Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01530-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/Afor the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jerry E. Thompson,President and Chief Executive Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the generalpartner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| /s/ JERRY E. THOMPSON                                                        |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jerry E. Thompson                                                            |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer  TEPPCO GP, Inc., General Partner |   |

 

June 16, 2006

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership and will be retained by TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#                                                                         2nd Fleet, Joint Force Command Norfolk hosts Nordic Defense Cooperation                                                                    

##### by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Ryan Seelbach, U.S. 2nd Fleet Public Affairs

21 February 2023
NORFOLK, Va. - Commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet’s (C2F) senior enlisted leadership hosted the Nordic Defense Cooperation (NORDEFCO) at Naval Station Norfolk, Jan. 27, 2023.

C2F’s Fleet Master Chief, Command Master Chief Huben Phillips, hosted NORDEFCO’s top naval enlisted leaders from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden during a tour of C2F and Joint Force Command Norfolk headquarters.

                U.S. Navy Recruit Training Command (RTC) hosted the Nordic Defence Cooperations’ (NORDEFCO) master chief petty officers of the navy for a tour of the recruit's boot camp process. More than 40,000 recruits train annually at the Navy's only boot camp. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Stephane Belcher)                            NORDEFCO visit                            U.S. Navy Recruit Training Command (RTC) hosted the Nordic Defence Cooperations’ (NORDEFCO) master chief petty officers of the navy for a tour of the recruit's boot camp process. More than 40,000 recruits train annually at the Navy's only boot camp. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Stephane Belcher)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Mass Communication Specialist 1sVIRIN: 230123-N-PG340-1023

“During this visit, these Nordic leaders are able to see first-hand how our U.S. Sailors enter into naval service and how they are trained in a variety of ratings,” Phillips said. “They are here to ask questions and get direct feedback from those who teach and mentor our U.S. Sailors from the very beginning.”

The NORDEFCO mission is to strengthen its participant’s national defense, explore common synergies and facilitate efficient common solutions.

Similar to the U.S. Navy’s Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy Jim Honea, these NORDEFCO members are the senior enlisted leaders in their respective navies. Honea had the opportunity to meet with the leaders at his office in Washington, D.C., where he spoke with them about his vision and focus for the U.S. Navy.

"The visit with our NORDEFCO partners is a wonderful opportunity to keep us connected to discuss similarities between our navies as well as share ideas and solutions that can help our leadership improve our fleets and quality of service for our Sailors," said Honea.

C2F, reestablished in 2018 in response to the changing global security environment. The fleet’s mission is to develop and employ maritime forces ready to fight across multiple domains in the Atlantic and Arctic ensuring access, deter aggression and defend U.S., allied, and partner interests.

For more U.S. 2nd Fleet news and photos, visit facebook.com/US2ndFleet, Https://Www.C2f.Usff.Navy.Mil/, and Twitter - @US2ndFleet

Tags:
**Recruit Training Command**U.S. 2nd Fleet
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN



### Hon. two. 3. 9h0ppra Colaptrollar of- Publio hoaounts 

### Austin,Terssofl



### wtor fuel", and the dlstrlbutor is rarqulrard in Sea. 3(a) 

### $4 rrallqet

the tax Rnd remit the envy to tha Sate.

### In see. q(a) 

### the distributorIs requlradto filea! bond In the mm of **&, TWO**  **thSn $1,000.**  **Bol ’** **mol% than**  **,$it5,&M.?. Co**  **b4 approve&**  

### by the ComptrQller. It 1s oondltlonad upon the dlstrlbutor*s pwforring the 

### duties o&et upso hisi 

### by the Aob, lnaludlngthe canoe to tha Istate of tha taxbewhich he I.6 requ;r& to

. tieo,14(a) lmiso 8 tax of four 

### csntrp per,gaUon 

### a user8 of mlfqueiIodgaaea*rindsl$ht 

### senha par &t&la on wara of "other liquid 

### fuela" , and to beoo;se a "uueP one mat apply ior 

### md reoeire a pennit 

### Ironi the Coqtroller. 

### u we. 14(b), thlis user 16 regulrsd to 

### ill6 a bondof $100. for oaoh rehleleto blr

### used, Tts ooilalt$onrP are 

### @hat such pwacm wSl1 pwZom hla dutien (LB a uoer, **ln4luul1q** 

### pqwnt **or the**  **tu thw**  **10~leu 8gfkiwt**  **him.**

A 

### dlrtsibut#w~a **ttwda** 

### whatever **its 9** **”** nal aImant* o.~Uioi;lonrd

anly aa protide ha Ma. 0 (a), .pk nlr would not **bo awumz8ble**  **fea** the 

# tat on Upefied $a&~! 

### and otaem L&quid fwla Zbvie6 by 8ec. 14(a). Per, a bond is only 0 trrot 

### utdnoavery oarmot 

### be had thereon for 

### thin@ outs ita ~UW **md ~0tditii0n8.**  

### !rrwt t* ItIMmb0xg, as 8. w. WiaaiEmaI. rt* Wwsh, Ot?O*, By, OQ., la 6*@. NM;,x2 arw. 

### later Oo. v, WluLMII, mm Et**, 65519. me prawtg2. lb moegnisetl, OS omrao, that a statutory be&idWW bo xmd ~JIthe l&h% ot~the 

### statuteur&m wh&ab it L6 flied, but the aondstiow or a 

### wer*a bond wnltertly amtLa not be read Into 

### a 4lata!lhto~'r bond.

AB yeur gueetfon iira&red, 

### it lr anmoxed in the rslptlrs. we do 

### ,wt umlezrtan$ th0t the $lUOO, band Zn weatian o~ntnfns all 

### the oon4ltlow 

### an4 oblfipabtam of both ths die%ribptior*ia pnd 

## wor*a bond, in 

### vthlah event 

### it 8aj be that OUT awwex would aat brralspl.%~~blr.
IOUT@ r%TyC~TLlly
ATTomm om.%.:L c ‘pT?AxA@
[No. 13258.

Department One.

June 20, 1917.]

#### Roger Marchetti, *Respondent,*v. San Francisco Oyster House, *Appellant.**1*

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered April 2, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

Affirmed.

*Tucker & Hyland,*for appellant.

1

Reported in 165 Pac. 657.

Per Curiam.

Roger Marchetti, the plaintiff, brought an action against the defendant corporation, San Francisco Oyster House, basing his cause of action upon a contract of employment evidenced by the record of a resolution entered in defendant’s minute book, as follows:

> “Resolved, that Roger Marchetti be employed as counsel for the company, and that he receive for his services as secretary and counsel of the company the sum of $25 per month.”

This minute was signed by Jack Barberis, president, and by Roger Marchetti, secretary, those two being the only stockholders and officers in the corporation, Barberis holding ninety-nine shares and Marchetti one share.

The plaintiff claimed the sum of $725 for salary and $91.05 for advances made the defendant, less payments received in the sum of $141.25, leaving a balance due plaintiff of $674.80. The defendant answered there was but $275 due plaintiff on account of salary, inasmuch as he had been discharged after a service of eleven months, on which defendant should be credited in the sum of $211 for moneys paid plaintiff. By way of cross-complaint, defendant alleged plaintiff was indebted to it in the sum of $212.10 for meals, board, and room, in the sum of $86 for moneys converted, and in the sum of $5 for money loaned. The reply admitted the indebtedness of plaintiff for the item of $86, but denied all other allegations of the cross-complaint. On the trial the plaintiff admitted the counterclaim of $212.10 for meals furnished. The cause was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $216.40.

The defendant appeals, assigning as error, first, the denial of its motion for an instructed verdict for defendant; and second, the giving of the following charge to the jury:

> “It will first be your duty to determine whether or not there was a contract made between the plaintiff and defendant corporation in the month of December, 1911. If you determine there was such a contract made, what was that contract? Was it a contract as claimed by the plaintiff at $25 for services as secretary and attorney *698for the corporation and not terminable at any agreed time whatever? Or, if there was a contract made for a period not to exceed one year?”

We do not find any error in the record under these assignments. There was sufficient evidence to carry the case to the jury, and the instruction was proper under the issues and evidence in the case.

The judgment will he affirmed.
# C_2009132EN.01000101.xml

| 11.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 5 June 2009

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Banka Slovenije

(ECB/2009/12)

2009/C 132/01

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of Banka Slovenije’s current external auditors will end after the audit for the financial year 2008. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of Banka Slovenije’s current external auditors will end after the audit for the financial year 2008. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2009.

| (3) | Banka Slovenije has selected Deloitte revizija d.o.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2009 to 2011, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Banka Slovenije has selected Deloitte revizija d.o.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2009 to 2011,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Deloitte revizija d.o.o. should be appointed as the external auditors of Banka Slovenije for the financial years 2009 to 2011.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 5 June 2009.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---