alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#                                                                         Navy Accepts Delivery of USNS John L. Canley                                                                    

##### by Team Ships Public Affairs

01 March 2023WASHINGTON -- 
                Expeditionary sea base USNS John L. Canley (ESB-6), Military Sealift Command’s newest ship, at its christening ceremony at the General Dynamics NASSCO shipyard in San Diego, Calif.                            220625-N-WD133-253                            Expeditionary sea base USNS John L. Canley (ESB-6), Military Sealift Command’s newest ship, at its christening ceremony at the General Dynamics NASSCO shipyard in San Diego, Calif.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Sarah BufordVIRIN: 220625-N-WD133-253WASHINGTON - ESB-class ships are highly flexible platforms that support various military operations such as Airborne Mine Counter Measures (AMCM), Special Operations Force (SOF) operations, Crisis Response Sea-basing (e.g., Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force), Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) and Unmanned Aviation Systems (UAS) operations. The ships are part of the critical access infrastructure that supports the deployment of forces“Today’s delivery highlights the strengths of the Navy and our industry partners, working together to bring ESB 6 and its range of capabilities to the fleet,” said Tim Roberts, Strategic and Theater Sealift program manager, Program Executive Office, Ships. “Sergeant Major Canley nobly served his country, and his namesake ship will help provide the warfighter with capability and access.”

The ESB ship class has a flight deck with four aviation operating spots capable of supporting MH-53E helicopters; accommodations; workspaces; and ordnance storage for embarked forces, enhanced command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence. These ships also feature a reconfigurable mission deck area to store equipment, including mine sleds and Rigid Hull Inflatable Boats.

Construction of the future USS Robert E. Simanek (ESB 7) is ongoing at General Dynamics NASSCO shipyard in San Diego.

As one of the Defense Department's largest acquisition organizations, Program Executive Office, Ships is responsible for executing the development and procurement of all destroyers, amphibious ships, special mission and support ships, and boats and craft.

Tags:
**Team Ships**USNS John L. Canley (ESB 6)

Terms:
**NAVSEA**Surface Ships
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 APRIL 17, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-14765

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00287-CV-J-32-MCR

RONNIE JONES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

NASSAU COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, 

J. STOUT, 

Correctional Officer, 

OFC. ORR, 

Correctional Officer, 

W. WILSON, 

Correctional Officer, 

OFC. LEE, 

Correctional Officer, 

 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

 (April 17, 2008)
2

Before MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Jones, a state prisoner, appeals pro se the summary judgment in

favor of Nassau County Correctional Officers Stout, Orr, Wilson, and Lee and

against Jones’s complaint that the officers violated his civil rights under the Eighth

and Fourteenth Amendments. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court ruled that

Jones failed to exhaust available administrative remedies under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We affirm.

Under section 1997e(a), “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison

conditions under section 1983 of this title . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail,

prison, or correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available

are exhausted.” This requirement of exhaustion is mandatory. Johnson v.

Meadows, 418 F.3d 1152, 1155 (11th Cir. 2005). We review de novo the

interpretation of this provision. Id.

The record establishes that the jail provided an administrative grievance

procedure, and Jones failed to comply with that procedure. Under the three-step

procedure, the inmate was required to notify the supervising sergeant of any

grievance and, if the matter was not resolved or the inmate was dissatisfied with

the outcome, the inmate could appeal to the lieutenant and then to the captain of
3

the jail. Captain Sidney Buck recalled that Jones had become combative with

officers when he received a uniform and was placed in administrative confinement. 

Both Buck and the sergeant in charge, Nolan Chancey, filed affidavits stating that

Jones had not orally complained or filed a written grievance after the incident.

The district court was correct to enter summary judgment in favor of the

officers. Jones produced no evidence that he followed the grievance procedure. 

Although Jones alleges that the Nassau County Jail does not have an adequate

grievance procedure, the alleged inadequacy of the procedure does not excuse his

failure to comply with it at all. See Higginbottom v. Carter, 223 F.3d 1259, 1261

(11th Cir. 2000). 

The summary judgment in favor of the Nassau County officers is

AFFIRMED.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 685 

To require a study of the feasibility of establishing the United States Civil 

Rights Trail System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2009 

Mr. CLAY (for himself and Mr. WAMP) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require a study of the feasibility of establishing the 

United States Civil Rights Trail System, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Civil 

5 Rights Trail System Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Archivist of the United States, in 

8 consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, and with 

9 the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to lands adminis10 tered by such Secretary, shall conduct a study of the feasiVerDate Nov 24 2008 06:18 Jan 27, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H685.IH H685

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 685 IH

1 bility of establishing the United States Civil Rights Trail 

2 System, as described in subsection (b), in substantially the 

3 same manner as studies performed by the Secretary of the 

4 Interior under section 5(b) of the National Trails System 

5 Act (Public Law 109–418). 

6 (b) DESCRIPTION OF UNITED STATES CIVIL RIGHTS

7 TRAIL SYSTEM.—For purposes of this section, the United 

8 States Civil Rights Trail System is a system of trails 

9 marking the geographic locations in the United States (in10 cluding its territories) of historically significant events re11 lated to struggles for civil rights based on racial equality, 

12 including signage or printed materials (or both) that pro13 vide information about the people and events involved in 

14 such struggles and associated with such location. 

15 SEC. 3. PILOT PROGRAM. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

17 establish and maintain individual trails marking the geo18 graphic locations of historically significant events related 

19 to struggles for civil rights based on racial equality. The 

20 Secretary shall provide for each trail signage or printed 

21 materials (or both) that provide information about the 

22 people and events involved in such struggles and associ23 ated with such locations. 

24 (b) LOCATION AND TIMING.—The Secretary may es25 tablish such a trail in each State where a significant civil 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 685 IH

1 rights event occurred. The Secretary shall establish at 

2 least 6 such trails as soon as practicable after the date 

3 of enactment of this Act. 

4 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry 

5 out this section there are authorized to be appropriated 

6 to the Secretary of the Interior such sums as are necessary 

7 for fiscal years 2010 through 2016. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
 Ensure full compliance with Title VII and 

Rehabilitation Act, including EEOC regulations, orders 

and other written instructions

 Report agency program efforts and accomplishments 

to the Department of Navy

 Comply with final EEOC orders for corrective action 

and relief

Knowthe 6essentials of a model EEOprogram

 Regular EEO updates are provided to senior management

 Procedures are established to prevent all forms of 

discrimination

 Evaluate managers and supervisors on efforts to ensure 

equal opportunity

 Maintain effective reasonable accommodation procedures

 Maintain clearly defined and fair personnel policies, 

selection and promotion procedures, rules of conduct and 

training systems

1. Demonstrated commitment from USFF’s 

Leadership

2. Integration of EEO into USFF’s strategic 

mission

3. Management and program accountability 

 EEO must be embraced by agency leadership

 Communicated through the ranks from the top down

 EEO principles must be a fundamental part of USFF culture

 EEOO must issue annual EEO and anti-harassment policy 

statements

 Command EEO Director has regular access to USFF and 

senior management

 EEO works collaboratively with Human Resources, 

supervisors/managers, counsel and other stakeholders 

 EEO program has sufficient resources

 Managers and employees are provided EEO training

 EEOO is briefed on the “State of the EEO Program” 

annually

4. Proactive prevention of unlawful discrimination

5. Efficiency

6. Responsiveness and legal compliance

 Conduct a self-assessment on an annual basis to 

monitor progress and identify areas where barriers 

may exist to exclude certain groups 

 Develop strategic plans to eliminate identified 

barriers

 Maintain an efficient, fair and impartial complaint 

resolution process

 Investigation and adjudication functions of the 

complaint resolution process are separate for legal 

defense arm or other offices with conflicts

 Encourage the widespread use of Alternative Dispute 

Resolution (ADR)

 Maintain an effective data collection system to track 

the workforce, applicant flow, reasonable 

accommodation requests, and complaints

US FLEET FORCES COMMAND

EEO CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

McKeever Street, Bldg. 15, Room 216

Portsmouth, VA 23709

(757) 396-7888
#### KIERNAN v. DUTCHESS COUNTY MUT. INS. CO.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

July 14, 1894.)

Insurance—Forfeiture of Policy—Waiver.

A provision that the policy shall be forfeited if the insured property is subject to mortgage is waived where the president of the company inspected the scene of the fire, and afterwards the insurance agent arranged for an appraisal, which was made, and proofs of loss were accepted by the company.

Appeal from circuit court, Ulster county.

Action by John Kiernan against the Dutchess County Mutual Insurance Company. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before MAYHAM, P. J., and PUTNAM and HERRICK, JJ.

Wilkinson & Cossum (Robert P. Wilkinson, of counsel), for appellant.

Howard Chipp, Jr., for respondent.

HERRICK, J.

The most serious question raised upon this appeal is upon the admissibility of a chattel mortgage in evidence. It is contended that the mortgage is a forfeiture of the policy, either entirely or in part. It seems to me that the forfeiture was waived by the acts of the defendant. Right after the fire the president of the company visited the scene of the fire, inspected the ruins, and conversed with the plaintiff; and it was after that that the plaintiff, with the defendant’s agent, made an arrangement for an appraisal, and an appraisal was made. Proofs of loss were also subsequently put in, and accepted by the defendant. It seems to me that these acts constitute a waiver. Brink v. Insurance Co., 80 N. Y. 108; Titus v. Insurance Co., 81 N. Y. 410; Roby v. Insurance Co., 120 N. Y. 510, 24 N. E. 808; Trippe v. Society, 140 N. Y. 23, 35 N. E. 316. The effect of the chattel mortgage as a forfeiture having been waived, the defendant was not injured by the court not receiving it in evidence. I see no occasion for an opinion. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

ImageEntertainment, Inc.Chatsworth, California

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 33-43241, No. 33-55393 and No. 33-57336)on Form S-8, the registration statements (No. 333-121912and No. 333-128487) on Form S-3 and the registrationstatement (No. 333-128535) on Form S-4 of ImageEntertainment, Inc. of our report dated June 25, 2004, relating tothe consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flowsof Image Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31,2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in theMarch 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of ImageEntertainment, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

LosAngeles, California

June 27, 2006

 

----
Case 1:07-cr-00553-BSJ Document 18 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00553-BSJ Document 18 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00553-BSJ Document 18 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00553-BSJ Document 18 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 43 of 43
```
EXHIBIT 99.1
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
```

```
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
```

```
 
```

```
 
```

```
In connection with the Annual Report of BMC Industries Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas C. Hepper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
```

```
 
```

```
     1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
```

```
 
```

```
     2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
```

```
 
```

```
March 26, 2003
```

```
 
```

> /s/Douglas C. HepperDouglas C. HepperChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

                    Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification

      I, William M. Lasky, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of JLG Industries,
Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

                                 Date: October 6, 2003


                                 /s/ William M. Lasky
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 William M. Lasky
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C)
(b) (6), (b) (7)(C)
(b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C)
--------------------------------------------------------------- (b) (6), (b) (7)(C)
(b) (6), (b) (7)(C)

(b) (6), (b) (7)(C)
(b) (6), (b) (7)(C)
(b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C)
Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-9      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-9      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cr-00555-AKH     Document 5-9      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 6 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
<PAGE>


Exhibit (23)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

To the Stockholders and Directors of Liqui-Box Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-35815, No. 33-35816, No. 33-35817, and No. 33-42452 of Liqui-Box Corporation
on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 1999 incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Liqui-Box Corporation for the year ended January
2, 1999.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule of Liqui-Box Corporation, listed in Item 14(a). This consolidated
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Columbus, Ohio

April 1, 1999