alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-025-1430-EU: G-01-0070]


Realty Action: Partial Cancellation of Sale of Public Land in 
Harney County, OR

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), DOI.

ACTION: Partial cancellation of Notice of Realty Action--Sale of public 
land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Notice of Realty Action--Sale of Public Land in Harney 
County, Oregon, published in the Federal Register, Volume 65, No. 222, 
on November 16, 2000, on Pages 69327-69329 is hereby cancelled as it 
relates to the sale of the following parcel only:

OR-55327--W.M., T. 27 S., R. 35E., Sec. 7, Lots 3, 4, NE\1/4\SW\1/
4\; Sec. 18, Lots 1,2.

    On December 19, 2000, in response to the Notice of Realty Action, a 
protest was filed concerning the sale of Parcel No. OR-55327. The 
parcel is being withdrawn from sale pending review of the merits of the 
protest. Upon resolution of the protest the parcel may be included in 
future offerings. All other provisions of the Notice of Realty Action 
remain in effect.
    On January 16, 2001 this notice also opens the land to the 
discretionary land laws which include leases, licenses, permits, 
rights-of-way, and disposal of mineral or vegetative resources other 
than under the mining laws.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted to the Three Rivers Resource 
Area Field Manager, HC 74-12533 Hwy 20 West, Hines, Oregon 97738.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Detailed information concerning this 
sale cancellation is available from Holly LaChapelle, Land Law 
Examiner, Three Rivers Resource Area at the above address, phone (541) 
573-4501.

    Dated: January 4, 2001.
Craig M. Hansen,
Three Rivers Resource Area Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-1129 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
Clear All

        30 January 2024    

                    USS Arleigh Burke Ports in Limassol, Cyprus                 
                LIMASSOL, Cyprus – The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) arrived in Limassol, Cyprus for a regularly scheduled port visit 25 Jan., 2024.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0001045934
<NAME>                           Community Savings
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                             14,193
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>             36,104
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       139,379
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>             69,735
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>              110,548
<LOANS>                           418,760
<ALLOWANCE>                         2,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    709,220
<DEPOSITS>                        544,295
<SHORT-TERM>                            0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                17,378
<LONG-TERM>                        67,105
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            5,095
<OTHER-SE>                         75,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>    709,220
<INTEREST-LOAN>                    24,766
<INTEREST-INVEST>                  11,241
<INTEREST-OTHER>                    1,464
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                   37,471
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                 16,832
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 20,296
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>              17,175
<LOAN-LOSSES>                         221
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                     (8)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                    13,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     6,560
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          4,284
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        4,284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                       7.49
<LOANS-NON>                         1,263
<LOANS-PAST>                            0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                       933
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                    2,542
<CHARGE-OFFS>                        (131)
<RECOVERIES>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                   2,632
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                2,632
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                 0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





For
      purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Bill Joll chief executive officer
      of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his
      knowledge:





(i)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
      ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ BILL
              JOLLBill
              Joll*Chief Executive Officer**On2 Technologies,
              Inc.*


Date:
      November 14, 2007




-36-
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Unilever PLC, a corporation
organized under the laws of the United Kingdom (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2011as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: 28 February, 2012



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman
|Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman    
|Chief Executive Officer                  

Dated: 28 February, 2012



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Raoul Jean-Marc Sidney Huet
|Raoul Jean-Marc Sidney Huet    
|Chief Financial Officer
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract Nos. Wl 5P7T-04-C-E405 ) 

N00039-04-C-0022 ) 

N00039-04-C-2009 ) 

F A8808-04-C-0022 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 58277, 58641, 58642 

David A. Churchill, Esq. 

Kevin C. Dwyer, Esq. 

Ethan E. Marsh, Esq. 

Charles L. Capito, Esq. 

Jenner & Block LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Lawrence S. Rabyne, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Arlington Heights, IL 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 9 June 2015 

~(. MARK A. MELNICK 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58277, 58641, 58642, Appeals of 

General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### THE ERSKINE M. PHELPS.

(District Court, N. D. California, First Division.

September 12, 1913.)

No. 15,406.

Shipping (§ 132*)—Suit eob Damage to Caego—Pleading.

In a suit to recover for damage to cargo, an allegation in the answer that the damage was from dangers of the seas, which were excepted in the bill of lading, must state the facts relied on to bring the case within such exception.

[Ed. *Note.—For*other eases, see Shipping, Cent. Dig. §§ 471-487; *Dee.*Dig. § 132.*]

In Admiralty. Suit by the Crane Company against the ship Erskine M. Phelps. On exceptions to answer.

Exceptions sustained.

Denman *&*Arnold, of San Francisco, Cal., for libelant.

Andros & Hengstler, of San Francisco, Cal., for claimant.

*

For other casessee same topic & § number in Deo-. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date. & Rep’r Indexes

DOOLING, District Judge.

The matter excepted to is as follows:

> “If it be true that the articles mentioned were damaged, the said damage was caused by a cause excepted in the bill of lading in article 4 of said libel referred to, to wit, the dangers of the seas.”

The grounds of the exception are that the matter excepted to is imperfect, uncertain, insufficient, and evasive for the reason that it does not appear therefrom by what particular, danger of the sea the said goods were damaged.

It is a general rule of pleading that a party relying upon an exception must state the facts which bring his case within the exception. The dangers of the sea are many and varied, and it should appear to the court from a statement of facts that the matters relied upon as *142constituting dangers of the sea do come within that category.' It does not so appear, nor does it appear at all just what is relied upon as a defense. It is claimed that this is the usual method of pleading in this court. As to this I am not advised, but an examination of reported cases has disclosed to me no pleading in this form and very many where the matters relied upon are set out at length. I think this the better practice. The information is generally solely within the knowledge of the claimant. Both the libelant and the court should be informed by the answer just what matters the claimant will rely upon as constituting the dangers of the sea exempting him from liability.

The exceptions to the answer will be sustained, and claimant allowed, if he so desire, to amend the answer to conform to these views.
(85 South. 922)

#### Ex parte LAMAR et al.

(6 Div. 76.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 20, 1920.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Ivey F. Lewis, of Birmingham, and Reese & Reese, of Selma, for appellant.

W. T. Stewart and W. K. Terry, both of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of L. & E. Lamar for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and opinion of that court rendered in the appeal of A. C. Deshazo v. L. & E. Lamar, 85 South. 586. Writ denied.
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 22 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04517-AKH Document 22 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
#                                                                         Higbee’s Pilgrims Celebrate Commissioning in Key West                                                                    

##### by Andre Sobocinski

17 May 2023

Tags:
**Navy medicine**USS Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG-123)
#### WALTER J. LEWIS, JR. *v.*CHELSEA G.C.A. REALTY PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

*Norman J. Voog,*in support of the petition.

*James V. Somers, Joseph G. Fortner, Jr.,*and *Patrick M. Bimey,*in opposition.

Decided March *2,*2005

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 596 (AC 23924), is denied.

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,430]

                    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the U.S. Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 5, 2001, applicable to workers of Unilever-Bestfoods, Lipton, Dallas, Texas. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 2, 2001 (66 FR 13086).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of 50 pound bulk margarine cubes. New information shows that some workers separated from employment at Unilever-Bestfoods, Lipton had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Conopco, Inc., a company established by the subject firm to handle worker compensation nationwise.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Unilever-Bestfoods, Lipton, who were adversely affected by increased imports of margarine.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-38,430 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Unilever-Bestfoods, Lipton, Conopco, Inc., Dallas, Texas, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 5, 1999, through February 5, 2003, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC this 23rd day of April, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-11105 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
June 27
, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ERRON KEITH NOLLEY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00394

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, this Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable
of reformatio n by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED , to read as provided in this Court’s opinion.

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED , and further
orders this decision certified below for observance.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 19, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60377 Summary Calendar

BOBBY SERTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BILLY SOLLIE, Individually and as Sheriff of Lauderdale County, Mississippi; DORIS CALLAHAN, Individually and as Jail Administrator; LAUDERDALE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:03-CV-403

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Concorde Gaming Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jerry L. Baum,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:


              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



              January 15, 2004                     /s/ Jerry L. Baum

                   (Date)                            Jerry L. Baum
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Interim Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 12-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 12 of 12
#### In the Matter of Michael Kelly, Respondent, v Charles J. Scully, as Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Green Haven Temporary Release Committee which denied the petitioner’s application for temporary release from the Green Haven Correctional Facility, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Nastasi, J.), entered May 12, 1988, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The petitioner, an inmate at the Green Haven Correctional Facility, commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the denial of his application for a medical leave of absence to attend a cardiac rehabilitation program under the temporary release program (Correction Law § 851 *et seg.J.*The petitioner failed, however, to personally serve a notice of petition on the respondents and the New York State Attorney-General *(see,*CPLR 403 [c]; 307 [1]), and similarly failed to seek an order to show cause to authorize his use of service by mail in lieu of personal service *(see,*CPLR 308 [5]; 7804 [c]; *Matter of Brown v Scully,*135 AD2d 713). The petitioner therefore failed to acquire personal jurisdiction over the respondents, and this fatal jurisdictional defect requires dismissal of this proceeding *(see, Macchia v Russo,*67 NY2d 592; *Matter of Brown v Scully, supra,*at 713; *Matter of Dello v Selsky,*135 AD2d 994; *Matter of Scott v Coughlin,*111 AD2d 480). In any event, this proceeding is barred by the four-month Statute of Limitations *(see, Matter of Soto v New York State Bd. of Parole,*107 AD2d 693, *affd*66 NY2d 817). Mangano, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Unilever PLC, a corporation
organized under the laws of the United Kingdom (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2012as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Dated: 5 March 2013                      
|                                         
|/s/ Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman
|Paulus Gerardus Josephus Maria Polman    
|Chief Executive Officer                  
|                                         
|Dated: 5 March 2013                      
|                                         
|/s/ Raoul Jean-Marc Sidney Huet          
|Raoul Jean-Marc Sidney Huet              
|Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05350-AKH Document 9 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9