alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, being the ChiefExecutive Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the sole general partner of TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the “Company”), hereby certifies that,to his knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended June 30, 2005, filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This written statement is beingfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q.  A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to TE Products Pipeline Company,Limited Partnership and will be retained by TE Products Pipeline Company,Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

 
| August 2, 2005                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Date                                   |
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ BARRY R. PEARL                     |   |
| Barry R. Pearl                         |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |
| TEPPCO GP, Inc., General  Partner |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BARBARA ANN DOMINEY,

Individually, a nd a s Trustee o f t he

DOMINEY EXEMPT BYPASS

TRUST, THE DOMINEY NON

- EXEMPT

BYPASS TRUST, THE DOMINEY 2012

IRREVOCABLE TRUST f/ b/o ELENA

MARQUARITA DOMINEY

LANGSTON, TERESA EDDINGER, and

ALLISON ALLEN, Co

- Trustees o f t he

D O MINEY INSURANCE TRUSTS OF

1993, and ESTATE OF SAMUEL

DOMINEY JR.,

Appellan ts,

vs.

ELENA MARQUARITA DOMINEY

LANGSTON, FLORENCE OLIVIA

DOMINEY CAMPBELL, and

MATTHEW DAVID DOMINEY,

Beneficiaries o f

THE DOMINEY 2012 IRREVOCABLE

TRUST, THE DOMINEY EXEMPT

BYPASS TRUST, THE DOMINEY NON

EXEMPT BYPASS TRUST, and the

DOMINEY INSURANCE TRUSTS OF

1993

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 187

- C V

Appeal from the

27 8 th Judicial District Court

o f W a lker County, Texas

(TC# 2130121 )2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an interloc u tory order signed September 24, 2021. 1 This appeal was

abated pending settlement negotiations. On December 14, 2022, Appellants filed a motion to

dismiss th is appeal. Appellants represented a settlement agreement has been signed by all the

parties. Appell ants certified that Appellees were not opposed to the dismiss al of the appeal.

Accordingly, we gran t the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1.

GINA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

1 This case was transferred to this Court from the Tenth Court of Appeals, our sister court in Waco

. W e decide it in

accordance with the precedent of that court. T EX .R.A PP .P. 41.3.
Exhibit
4.8


 





 


April 13, 2010


 


Consent of Richard Gowans, P. Eng.


Board of Directors, Osisko Mining Corporation


United States Securities and Exchange Commission


 


To the Board of Directors of Osisko Mining
Corporation


 


I, Richard Gowans, P. Eng., of Micon International
Limited, consent to:


 


1.                                       The
incorporation by reference in the Offer and Circular of Osisko Mining
Corporation (the “Company”), included as part of the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form F-8 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
of the description of the report titled “Feasibility Study — Canadian Malartic
Project (Malartic, Quebec)” dated December, 2008.


 


2.                                       The information
that forms the summary of the report of the description of project and to the
use of my name under the Offer and Circular and Registration Statement as a
named expert.


 


	
  Dated
  as of the 13th day of April, 2010

  
	
   

  
	
  SIGNED

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Richard Gowans

  	
   

  
	
  Richard Gowans

  



 


SUITE
900 - 390 BAY STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 2Y2


Telephone
(1) (416) 362-5135 Fax (1) (416) 362 5763
#### Annmarie Giorgi, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Catherine Giorgi, et al., Respondents, v Union Free School District No. 32, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered March 7, 1988, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for discovery and inspection of the premises where the accident occurred and permitted the drilling of a hole in connection therewith provided the plaintiffs assumed responsibility for restoring the structure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting permission to the plaintiffs’ engineer to drill a small hole in the defendant’s premises *(see, Castro v Alden Leeds, Inc.,*116 AD2d 549; *Di Piano v Yamaha Motor Corp.,*106 AD2d 367). The plaintiffs made a sufficient showing that due to alteration of the premises, their engineer needed to drill the hole in order to take an accurate measurement of the height of the ramp from which the infant plaintiff fell. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Fiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 [Registration No. 333-35539, No. 333-83842, and No.
333-126981] of our report dated March 9, 2006 relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, of Checkpoint Systems, Inc., which
appears in Checkpoint Systems, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 25, 2005.




/S/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 9, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 790 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 790

To prohibit issuance of any lease or other authorization by the Federal 
 Government that authorizes exploration, development, or production of 
 oil or natural gas in any marine national monument or national marine 
sanctuary or in the fishing grounds known as Georges Bank in the waters 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2009

 Mr. Markey of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, 
  Mr. Delahunt, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Tierney, Mr. Welch, Mr. Hodes, Ms. 
   Shea-Porter, Ms. Pingree of Maine, Mr. Hinchey, Ms. Tsongas, Mr. 
  Capuano, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Lynch) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit issuance of any lease or other authorization by the Federal 
 Government that authorizes exploration, development, or production of 
 oil or natural gas in any marine national monument or national marine 
sanctuary or in the fishing grounds known as Georges Bank in the waters 
                         of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Georges Bank Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LEASING IN CERTAIN FEDERAL PROTECTED AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal 
law, no lease or other authorization may be issued by the Federal 
Government that authorizes exploration, development, or production of 
oil or natural gas in--
            (1) any marine national monument or national marine 
        sanctuary; or
            (2) the fishing grounds known as Georges Bank in the waters 
        of the United States, which is one of the largest and 
        historically important fishing grounds of the United States.
    (b) Identification of Coordinates of Georges Bank.--The Secretary 
of Commerce, after publication of public notice and an opportunity for 
public comment, shall identify the specific coordinates that delineate 
Georges Bank in the waters of the United States for purposes of 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31,2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD TO MARCH 31,2000 (UNAUDITED)AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        91,524,719
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   7,515,900
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             128,978,767
<CASH>                                      16,928,764
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          13,420,343
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         972,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             165,471,226
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            110,815,718
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             34,234,983
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        40,790
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,053,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               165,471,226
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          6,669,666
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   7,168
<BENEFITS>                                   1,182,624
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           811,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,318,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,318,096
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,318,096
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Raphael Amelio, Jr., Appellant, v Antonia D’Apice et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Westchester, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Charles Balancia, Daniel A. Piloseno and Pamela Trapasso King as candidates in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1989, for the public offices of Supervisor/Mayor, Councilman/Trustee, and Councilman/Trustee, respectively, of the Town of Harrison, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Facelle, J.), entered August 10, 1989, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner contends that the candidates’ designating petitions violated Election Law § 6-132 in that the petitions did not set forth the political subdivision for the public offices for which the candidates were seeking nomination. A review of the designating petitions reveals that their respective descriptions of the public offices sought omitted a geographic detail (the town name) that would have made the descriptions more precise. However, the designating petitions read as a *714whole were "sufficiently informative” to show that the town involved was the Town of Harrison *(Matter of Donnelly v McNab,*83 AD2d 896). Each page of the respective petitions listed the candidate’s residence as the Town of Harrison. Such information, in conjunction with the title of the public offices sought, was sufficiently informative as to preclude any reasonable probability of confusion and was sufficient to constitute compliance with the mandate of Election Law § 6-132 *(see, Matter of Liepshutz v Palmateer,*112 AD2d 1101, *affd*65 NY2d 965).

We also find no merit to the petitioner’s related assertion that the inclusion of a post-office address for each candidate created a reasonable probability of confusion. Election Law § 6-132 requires that each designating petition include a post-office address if it is not the same as the place of the candidate’s residence.

We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05726-PKC     Document 3      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05726-PKC     Document 3      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05726-PKC     Document 3      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 36 Filed 01/15/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7531

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY TURLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District

Judge. (CR-00-16; CA-03-98-7-JPG)

Submitted: December 21, 2005 Decided: January 19, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Turley, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Turley seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. This order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Turley has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.19

             DESCRIPTION OF NEIL R. YOUNG'S EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENT

     In connection with the appointment of Neil R. Young as President and Chief 
Executive Officer of Grubb & Ellis Company (the "Company") in February 1996, 
Mr. Young has agreed to serve in such capacities for a term expiring in June 
1999, with an option to extend the term for an additional year. He will receive 
an annual salary of $400,000 through June 30, 1997, which salary thereafter 
increases to $425,000 per year. He is eligible to receive incentive 
compensation targeted at 50% of his annual salary, based upon achievement of 
certain Company performance levels to be determined, with a minimum incentive 
payment of $125,000 to be paid with respect to the 1997 fiscal year. Mr. Young 
also received, subject to stockholder approval of an amendment to the Company's 
1990 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), a non-qualified 
option to purchase 450,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise 
price of $2.375 per share, with a ten-year term and five-year vesting, with the 
first installment vesting on December 31, 1996. The option contains additional 
terms related to vesting and exercise of the option which will be effective 
upon stockholder approval of the Plan amendment. Additional terms and 
conditions of Mr. Young's employment with the Company have yet to be 
determined, and will be set forth in an employment agreement expected to be 
entered into between Mr. Young and the Company.
**Train, Certify and Provide Combat-Ready Forces**Train, certify and provide combat-ready Navy forces to combatant commanders that are capable of conducting prompt, sustained naval, joint and combined operations in support of U.S. national interests. **Plan and Execute Assigned Service Functions**Command and control subordinate Navy forces and shore activities during the planning and execution of assigned service functions in support of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO). **Provide Operational Planning and Coordination Support**Provide operational planning and coordination support to Commander, U.S. Northern Command/Commander, U.S. Element North American Aerospace Defense Command, and Commander, U.S. Strategic Command. **Plan and Execute Joint Missions**Command and control subordinate forces during the planning and execution of joint missions as Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Northern Command (USNAVNORTH) to Commander, U.S. Northern Command. 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 834 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to exempt certain 

peace officers from certain minimum sentencing requirements for using 

a firearm to commit a crime of violence during or in relation to their 

employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2009 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

exempt certain peace officers from certain minimum sentencing requirements for using a firearm to commit a 

crime of violence during or in relation to their employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ramos and Compean 

5 Justice Act of 2009’’. 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 834 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN MINIMUM SENTENCING 

2 REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN PEACE OFFI3 CERS WHO USE A FIREARM TO COMMIT A 

4 CRIME OF VIOLENCE DURING OR IN RELA5 TION TO THEIR EMPLOYMENT. 

6 Section 924(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(6)(A) The minimum sentencing requirements 

9 in this subsection shall not apply to a person who 

10 used, carried, or possessed a firearm if— 

11 ‘‘(i) the offense under this subsection oc12 curred during or in relation to the performance 

13 of the duties of the person as a peace officer; 

14 ‘‘(ii) the firearm is of the same type as the 

15 firearm authorized to be carried by the person 

16 in the performance of those duties; and 

17 ‘‘(iii) the crime during and in relation to 

18 which the offense under this subsection oc19 curred is a crime of violence. 

20 ‘‘(B) In subparagraph (A), the term ‘peace offi21 cer’ means an officer or employee of the Federal 

22 Government, or of a State or local government, who 

23 is authorized by law to carry a firearm in the lawful 

24 performance of his or her duties as such an officer 

25 or employee.’’. 

Æ 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ     Document 20      Filed 08/21/2007     Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer**
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AMB Property Corporation,the sole general partner of AMB Property, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the OperatingPartnership for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theOperating Partnership.   Dated: August 9, 2004      /s/ HAMID R. MOGHADAM   Hamid R. Moghadam Chairman and CEO    /s/ W. BLAKE BAIRD   W. Blake Baird President and Director    /s/ MICHAEL A. COKE   Michael A. Coke CFO and Executive Vice President
     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Operating Partnership, whethermade before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.
#### ROTHMILLER, Respondent, v. STEIN, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

August 1, 1894.)

Action by Adolph Roth-miller against Theodore G. Stein, Jr. U. J. M. Guggenheimer, for appellant. Kohn, Ruck & Lippmann, for respondent.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted. See 29 N. Y. Supp. 707.
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9-19 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9-19 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 2