alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 28, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00202

- CV

MUSCULOSKELETAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS, LLC

, Appellan t

v.

JAR ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a Premier Medical Imaging, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 12957 Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The appellee's brief is due on October 27, 2020.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of October, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 869 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Scott Reed Federal 

Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mr. CHANDLER (for himself and Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Scott Reed Federal Building and United 

States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

5 located at 101 Barr Street in Lexington, Kentucky, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Scott Reed Federal 

7 Building and United States Courthouse’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 869 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Scott 

6 Reed Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### SALVO et al. v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

April 18, 1922.)

No. 2967.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.

Suit by the United States against Sam Salvo and others. From a decree granting an injunction, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Henry W. Freeman, of Chicago, 111., for appellants.

P. H. Ward, of Sterling, 111., for the United States.

Before BAKER, ALSCHULER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a decree enjoining appellants from maintaining a nuisance on premises therein described. The opinions in Lewinsohn v. U. S., 278 Fed: 421, Allen v. U. S., 278 Fed. 429, Grossman v. U. S., 280 Fed. 683, Shore v. U. S., 282 Fed. 857, and Heitler v. U. S„ 280 Fed. 703, recently decided by this court, are decisive of all the questions presented on this appeal.

The decree is affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00778-CR

Michael Moreno Salazar, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 19,493, HONORABLE CHARLES E. LANCE, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Michael Moreno Salazar was placed on community supervision following

a conviction for felony driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a), .09(b)

(West Supp. 2001). He now appeals from an order revoking supervision and imposing sentence of

imprisonment for two years.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v.

State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.

1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right

to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed: August 30, 2001

Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11222]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Sec. 103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 
16 U.S.C. 460bb note, Title I of Public Law 104-333, 110 Stat. 4097, 
and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is hereby 
given that a public meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of Directors 
will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 23, 2001, 
at the Officers' Club, 50 Moraga Avenue, Presidio of San Francisco, 
California. The Presidio Trust was created by Congress in 1996 to 
manage approximately eighty percent of the former U.S. Army base known 
as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California.
    The purposes of this meeting are to: (1) Receive staff reports 
regarding environmental remediation, wildlife at the Presidio, and 
historic building rehabilitation; (2) receive a staff report and take 
action regarding the Vegetation Management Program; and (3) receive 
public comment in accordance with the Trust's Public Outreach Policy.
    Time: The meeting will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on 
Wednesday, May 23, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Officers' Club, 50 Moraga 
Avenue, Presidio of San Francisco.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Middleton, Deputy Director for 
Operations and Governmental Affairs, the Presidio Trust, 34 Graham 
Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, California 94129-0052, 
Telephone: (415) 561-5300.

    Dated: April 30, 2001.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-11222 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-U
HYNES & HOWES INSURANCE COUNSELORS, INC.
                            Comparative Balance Sheet
                           September 30, 1998 and 1997



                                                           September 30,
          Assets                                        1998            1997
Current Assets:
   Cash in Bank                                  $    34,183     $    10,675
   Other Current Assets (Note 3)                       8,050           7,170

      Total Current Assets                       $    42,233     $    17,845

Investments:
   Investments in Affiliated Company (Note 4)    $     2,720     $     2,720
   Real Estate Contracts Receivable (Note 3)         639,608         615,566
   Real Estate On Hand                                     0          31,848

      Total Investments                          $   642,328     $   650,134

      Total Assets                               $   684,561     $   667,979


Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
<PAGE>
 
                          DAUPHIN DEPOSIT CORPORATION
                                                                    EXHIBIT (11)
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                               1995        1994        1993
                                            ----------- ----------- -----------
   <S>                                      <C>         <C>         <C>
   PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
   Earnings
     Net income............................ $65,565,000 $70,039,000 $67,917,000
                                            =========== =========== ===========
   Shares
     Weighted average common shares
      outstanding..........................  30,787,415  31,998,308  32,450,480
     Stock options and other stock
      incentive plans considered to be
      common stock equivalents.............     178,843     171,426     185,670
                                            ----------- ----------- -----------
     Weighted average common stock and
      common stock equivalents
      outstanding..........................  30,966,258  32,169,734  32,636,150
                                            =========== =========== ===========
   Primary earnings per common share.......       $2.12       $2.18       $2.08
                                                  =====       =====       =====
   FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
   Earnings
     Net income............................ $65,565,000 $70,039,000 $67,917,000
     After tax interest expense applicable
      to convertible debenture.............     295,311     305,897     331,695
                                            ----------- ----------- -----------
                                            $65,860,311 $70,344,897 $68,248,695
                                            =========== =========== ===========
   Shares
     Weighted average common shares
      outstanding..........................  30,787,415  31,998,308  32,450,480
     Assuming conversion of 9.00%
      convertible debentures issued June
      30, 1989.............................     315,962     327,988     353,440
     Stock options and other stock
      incentive plans considered to be
      common stock equivalents.............     224,412     169,297     193,490
                                            ----------- ----------- -----------
     Weighted average common stock and
      common stock equivalents
      outstanding..........................  31,327,789  32,495,593  32,997,410
                                            =========== =========== ===========
   Fully diluted earnings per common
    share..................................       $2.10       $2.16       $2.07
                                                  =====       =====       =====
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                  CONCORDE GAMING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Year Ended September 30,       
                                                                       ---------------------------------
                                                                           1996                 1995       
                                                                       ------------        -------------
<S>                                                                    <C>                 <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding, net of
 treasury stock, beginning of year                                       21,929,793           22,083,193

Shares issued for mergers, acquisitions and compensation                          -             (115,576)

Adjustments for common stock equivalents (1)                                245,622               15,761
                                                                       ------------        -------------

Weighted average common and common equivalent                            22,175,415           21,983,378
                                                                       ============        =============
 shares outstanding, end of year

Net income                                                             $    557,659        $   1,059,873
                                                                       ============        =============

Net income per common and common equivalent share                             $0.03                $0.05
                                                                              =====                =====
</TABLE>

(1)     Represents adjustments  computed under the  treasury stock method for 
        stock options and warrants granted at fair market value at date of 
        grant.
MICHAEL A. CARDOZO 

Co,pornlion Coutlsel 

LAW DEPARTMENT 

I00 CHURCH STREET 

NEW YORK, NY 10007 

GABRIEL P. HARVIS 

Assistant Corporation Counsel 

Phone. (212) 788-1816 

Fax: (212) 788-9776 

ghan,is@law.nyc.gov 

January 28,2008 

BY FAX 

Honorable John G. Koeltl 

United States District Judge 

United States Courthouse 

500 Pearl Street, Room 1030 

New York. New York 10007 

Re: Smallwood v. City of New York, et al. 

07 Civ. 571 1 (JGK)(KNF) 

Your Honor: 

I am an Assistant Corporation Counsel in the Special Federal Litigation Division 

of the New York City Law Departnlent and the attorney recently assigned to represent 

defendants City of New York and David Wenzel in this matter. I write to respectfully request 

that defendant Wenzel be allowed until February 11, 2008, to answer or otherwise respond to the 

complaint. Plaintiffs counsel consents to this request.' 

Upon information and belief, defendant Wenzel has been sewed in this action. 

The undersigned was only recently assigned to this case and the instant application is being made 

so that representational issues may be resolved and the answer prepared and served. Thus, 

defendants respectfully request that defendant Wenzel's time to answer or respond to the 

complaint be extended until February I 1,2008. 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. 

Respectfully submitted, 

ZGH2772) orporation Counsel 

cc: Rose Weber, Esq. (by fax) 

APPLICATION GRANTED 

G. Koeltl, U.S.D.J. 

Case 1:07-cv-05711-JGK Document 7 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND CEO

     I, Robert C. Harbage, President and Chief Executive Officer of UBICS, Inc.:

     (1) do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
         2002, that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on
         Form 10-Q of UBICS, Inc. for the quarterly period ended
         September 30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement
         accompanies fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of UBICS, Inc.;

         and

     (2) am unable to certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
         Act of 2002, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
         Act of 1934, because the interim financial statements contained in the
         Periodic Report have not been reviewed by an independent accountant for
         the reasons more fully described in Part I, Item 1 of the Periodic
         Report and in the Form 8-K to be filed concurrently herewith.

Dated: November 14, 2002

                                           By: /s/ Robert C. Harbage
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert C. Harbage
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-68171 on Form S-8 dated December 1, 1998, in the Registration Statement No.
333-80163 on Form S-8 dated June 8, 1999, in Registration Statement No.
333-64286 on Form S-3 dated June 29, 2001 of Knight-Ridder, Inc. and in the
related Prospectuses, of our report dated January 18, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Knight-Ridder, Inc. included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 30, 2001.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


San Jose, California
March 25, 2002
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 762 

To validate final patent number 27–2005–0081, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2009 

Mr. HELLER (for himself, Ms. BERKLEY, and Ms. TITUS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To validate final patent number 27–2005–0081, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINAL PATENT AND LAND RECONFIGURATION 

4 IN CLARK COUNTY AND LINCOLN COUNTY, 

5 NEVADA. 

6 Patent No. 27–2005–0081 and its associated land re7 configuration issued by the Bureau of Land Management 

8 on February 18, 2005, is hereby affirmed and validated 

9 as having been issued pursuant to and in compliance with 

10 the provisions of the Nevada-Florida Land Exchange Au11 thorization Act of 1988 (Public Law 100–275), the NaVerDate Nov 24 2008 04:12 Jan 30, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H762.IH H762

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 762 IH

1 tional Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and the Federal 

2 Land Policy Management Act of 1976 for the benefit of 

3 the desert tortoise and other species and their habitat to 

4 increase the likelihood of their recovery. The process uti5 lized by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and 

6 the Bureau of Land Management in reconfiguring the 

7 lands as shown on Exhibit 1–4 of the Final Environmental 

8 Impact Statement for the Planned Development Project 

9 MSHCP, Lincoln County, NV (FWS–R8–ES–2008– 

10 N0136) and the reconfiguration provided for in Special 

11 Condition 10 of Army Corps of Engineers Permit No. 

12 200125042 are hereby ratified. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Clear All

        02 May 2023    

                    Rare Retirement Ceremony Hosted at Naval Special Warfare Group Four                 
                 Naval Special Warfare Group Four (NSWG-4) hosted a rare dual retirement ceremony on March 16.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2015

Order 

September 23, 2015

152179(14)(16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

FRANKLIN DAJUAN-WARRE ANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 152179

COA: 327177

Wayne CC: 13-009902-FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion and amended motion of defendantappellant to file a supplemental application for leave to appeal are GRANTED. The 

supplemental application submitted on September 9, 2015, is accepted for filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,726,000
<SECURITIES>                                    61,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,344,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   555,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,190,000
<PP&E>                                      15,869,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,541,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,744,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,189,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  86,361,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,744,000
<SALES>                                     52,918,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,918,000
<CGS>                                       39,072,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,072,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            33,496,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               411,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,507,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,507,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,507,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit (23)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

To the Stockholders and Directors of Liqui-Box Corporation


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-35815, No. 33-35816, No. 33-35817, and No. 33-42452 of Liqui-Box Corporation
on Form S-8 of our report dated March 13, 2000 incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Liqui-Box Corporation for the year ended January
1, 2000.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule of Liqui-Box Corporation, listed in Item 14(a). This consolidated
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Columbus, Ohio

March 27, 2000


                                       61