alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Stewards of the Sea Menu**

                    - Stewards of the Sea Home
                    - About the Program and Exhibit
                    - Press Room                        - News
                      - Videos
                      - Photos
                    - Meet Stewie — the Navy's Environmental Mascot
                    - Fleet Installations and Environmental

**Navy Environmental Careers**

----

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 64

To amend title 28, United States Code, to repeal the restriction on the 
   jurisdiction of courts, justices, and judges to hear or consider 
   applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of 
             certain aliens detained by the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to repeal the restriction on the 
   jurisdiction of courts, justices, and judges to hear or consider 
   applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of 
             certain aliens detained by the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Commissions Habeas Corpus 
Restoration Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON HABEAS CORPUS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (e).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--
            (1) In general.--Chapter 99 of title 28, United States 
        Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
        section:
``Sec. 1632. Jurisdiction to hear actions against the United States 
              relating to enemy combatants
    ``Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 1005(e) 
of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (10 U.S.C. 801 note), no court, 
justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any 
action against the United States or its agents, other than an 
application for a writ of habeas corpus, relating to any aspect of the 
detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of 
an alien who is or was detained by the United States and has been 
determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an 
enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination.''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
        following new item:

``1632. Jurisdiction to hear actions against the United States relating 
                            to enemy combatants.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to all cases, without exception, pending on or after the date of 
the enactment of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-
148; 119 Stat. 2739) which relate to any aspect of the detention, 
transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of detention of an alien 
detained by the United States since September 11, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                       821
<INVENTORY>                                     23,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,494
<PP&E>                                          88,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,326
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,551
<SALES>                                         34,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,183
<CGS>                                           22,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   256
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,141
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,141
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




Date:  April  24,  2003                    /s/Neil  Christiansen
                                           -------------------------
                                           Neil  Christiansen
                                           Chief  Executive  Officer
                                           Chief  Financial  Officer
Case 1:07-cr-00553-BSJ Document 17 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         167,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,300)
<INVENTORY>                                    136,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               739,900
<PP&E>                                       1,547,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               (927,800)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,446,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          734,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           800
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,446,500
<SALES>                                        749,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               775,500
<CGS>                                          433,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  671,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 91,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85




</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddie Chanza, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered November 25, 1987, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of *8 Vs*to 25 years’ imprisonment to run consecutively to three concurrent indeterminate terms of 5 to 15 years’ imprisonment.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that all the indeterminate terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit in the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the instances of alleged prosecutorial misconduct of which he complains. Further, we do not find that the court’s charge, when viewed as a whole, failed to instruct the jury adequately on the concept of acting in concert.

We agree, however, that the sentence imposed for assault in the first degree should run concurrently to the sentence *593imposed for manslaughter in the first degree and modify the judgment accordingly *(see, People v Medina,*152 AD2d 602 [decided herewith]).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit *(see, People v Medina, supra).*Mollen, P. J., Spatt, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
CODDLE CREEK FINANCIAL CORP.
                                   Exhibit 99
                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Coddle
Creek Financial Corp. (the "Company") certifies that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in that Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 15, 2003                      /s/George W. Brawley
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         George W. Brawley
                                         President and CEO

Date:  May 15, 2003                      /s/ Billy R. Williams
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Billy R. Williams
                                         Secretary/Controller


*This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-01542-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
A92A1626.

#### LANIER v. CITY OF MANCHESTER.

(423 SE2d 30)

Decided September 16, 1992

Reconsideration denied September 28, 1992

*Virgil L. Brown & Associates, Virgil L. Brown, Eric D. Hearn, Bentley-C. Adams III,*for appellant.

*Mullins & Whalen, Andrew J. Whalen III, Nancy A. Bradford, Tyron C. Elliott,*for appellee.

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Via traffic citation, defendant was accused of violating OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (4). After being tried in the Municipal Court of the City of Manchester, defendant was found guilty and appealed to the Superior Court of Meriwether County. The Superior Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court, and defendant appeals. Held:

In her sole enumeration of error, defendant contends the Superior Court erred in affirming the judgment of the Municipal Court because the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction.

Following her arrest, defendant was given a breathalyzer test on an Intoximeter 3000 machine. The test yielded a .14 blood/alcohol concentration result. A second test, administered only minutes later, yielded a .16 blood/alcohol concentration result. Defendant argues that her conviction cannot rest upon these test results because an Intoximeter 3000 machine has a margin of error of .01 and numerous substances, such as acetone, have been known to interfere with the test. This argument is without merit. The test results were more than sufficient to support defendant’s conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. See *Brannan v. State,*261 Ga. 128, 129 (3) (401 SE2d 269). The mere fact that an Intoximeter 3000 machine “has some margin for error or may give an erroneous result under certain circumstances” does not diminish the evidentiary value of the test results. *Lattarulo v. State,*261 Ga. 124, 126 (3), 127 (401 SE2d 516).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Sognier, C. J., and Cooper, J., concur.*
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 33 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3719SI

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Edward M. Rhone, also known as * Sidney Rhone, also known as Zulu, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: April 16, 1998

Filed: April 22, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, JOHN R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Onappeal from the guidelines sentence imposed by the district court, Edward M. Rhone contends the district court improperly increased Rho ne's offense level for his managerial role in criminal activity that involved five or more participants. After a careful review of the record, we reject Rhone's contention and conclude an opinion by this court would have no precedential valu e. We thus affirm Rhone's sentence without further discussion. See8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 35 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 35 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01529-AKH Document 35 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Clear All

        27 February 2023    

                    Carabiniere (F 593) Completes Operations with George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group                 
                MEDITERRANEAN SEA – The Italian Navy Carlo Bergamini-class frigate ITS Carabiniere (F 593) detached from the George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group (CSG), Feb. 14, 2023, after operating with the strike group throughout the month.            

        17 February 2023    

                    Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit 12 Completes Exercise MAGRE                 
                ADRIATIC SEA – Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Mobile Unit 12, assigned to Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 10, participated in exercise MAGRE 23.1 in Cartagena, Spain, Jan. 28-Feb. 4, 2023.            

        24 January 2023    

                    Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 5 Completes Training in Bizë, Albania                 
                ADRIATIC SEA - Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 5 completed inland training using an Albanian range in Bizë, Albania, Jan. 15-17, 2023.            

        17 November 2022    

                    Carrier Strike Group Ten Participates in Humanitarian Mine Action in Split, Croatia                 
                SPLIT, Croatia - The Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Team assigned to Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 10 took part in the eighth iteration of the Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) in Split, Croatia, Oct. 24 – Nov. 11, 2022.             

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-31115

Summary Calendar

RODERICK PRESIDENT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BARON KAYLO; CLYDE BENSON; CAPTAIN VILLEMARETTE;

SERGEANT DESELLE; LIEUTENANT COLONEL TIGNER; 

MARCUS BECKHAM; STEVE GAYNARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:01-CV-2613 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roderick President, Louisiana state prisoner # 384264,

proceeding pro se, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

(IFP) in an appeal of the district court’s final judgment that

dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. President’s IFP motion

is a challenge to the magistrate judge’s certification that his

appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d

197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). 
No. 05-31115

-2-

President’s change in custodial status, as alleged in his

complaint, does not affect a protectable liberty interest or

violate his constitutional rights. See Sandin v. Conner, 515

U.S. 472, 486 (1995). Further, President did not allege that the

loss of his good time credits pursuant to a disciplinary

proceeding violated the procedural protections provided by Wolff

v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 556, 564-66 (1974), or allege that he

received any other punishment that would implicate a due process

concern.

President’s retaliation claims likewise fail because he does

not show that but for his grievance filed in December 2000

regarding the prison’s smoking policy, he would not have been

subject to disciplinary proceedings. Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d

1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995). 

President has not shown that the district court erred in

certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. He

has not shown that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on

appeal. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED and

the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202

n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

The dismissal of this appeal counts as one strike under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387

(5th Cir. 1996). President is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates

three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be able to
No. 05-31115

-3-

proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.
Order filed December 2 2 , 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00646

- CV

____________ ERIC D. BURNS , Appellant

V. JAMES A. WHITE, ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 19

- DCV

- 268373



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due December 3, 2020

. No brief or motion for
extension of time has been filed. Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or
before January 2 1, 2021, the court will dismiss the appe al for want of prosecution.
See T ex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIA M

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices J ewel l and Poissant

.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

The undersigned,being the Chief Financial Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the sole general partnerof TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the “Company”), herebycertifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

This writtenstatement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-Q.  A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toTE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership and will be retained by TEProducts Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| November 2,  2004                                  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date                                               |
|                                               |
|                                               |
| /s/  CHARLES  H. LEONARD                 |   |
| Charles H.  Leonard                                |
| Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
| TEPPCO GP,  Inc., General Partner                  |
|                                                    |        |  |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 2