alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of John R. Beaudoin, as Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the County of Rensselaer, Respondent, v David RR., Appellant.

Casey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Rensselaer County (Perkinson, J.), entered October 6, 1988, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, to adjudicate respondent as the father of a child born to Kelly SS.

On March 30, 1983, petitioner filed a paternity petition alleging that Kelly SS. and her infant daughter were likely to become public charges and that respondent was the father of the child. Respondent denied paternity. At the nonjury trial, both respondent and the mother admitted that they lived together from November 1981 until April 1982. The mother claims that sexual intercourse occurred two to three times a week during this period. Respondent admits to having had intercourse with her only about 10 times during the same period. A human leucocyte antigen (hereinafter HLA) test indicated a 98.81% probability that respondent fathered the child. This test was admitted into evidence, having been properly certified pursuant to CPLR 4518 (c). Family Court determined that respondent was the father of the child and was responsible for its support until the child reached 21 years of age or became self-supporting.

*777We agree with the determination of Family Court. The admitted cohabitation of the parties, together with the HLA test results, supplies clear and convincing evidence of respondent’s paternity, as found by Family Court *(see, Matter of Ryan v Paul B.,*124 AD2d 463). Although the exact date of conception was not fixed by the mother, the conception was stated to have occurred "sometime in November 1981”. We find this testimony legally sufficient when coupled with the results of the HLA test.

Respondent contends that failure to establish a chain of custody relative to the blood used in the HLA test is fatal to the admissibility of the HLA test results. We find no merit in this contention. CPLR 4518 (c) and Family Court Act § 532 (a) permit the results of an HLA test when the test is properly certified under the provisions of CPLR 4518 (c), which it was in this case. The statute makes no provision for any other foundational basis necessary for the admissibility of the results of such test *(see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of County of Erie v Richardson,*112 AD2d 760; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of County of Erie v Gee,*106 AD2d 897). The order appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed.

Order affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 6 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 7 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 8 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 9 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 10 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 11 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 12 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 13 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 14 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 15 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 16 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 17 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 18 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 19 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 20 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 21 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 22 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 23 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 24 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 25 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 26 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 27 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 28 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 29 of 30Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 1-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 30 of 30
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Maria Da Conceicao Santos NETA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-2507.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2013.

Decided: April 30, 2013.

Maria Da Conceicao Santos Neta, Petitioner Pro Se. Yamileth G. Davila, Jem Colleen Sponzo, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maria Da Conceicao Santos Neta, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motions to reconsider and reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (2012). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *In re: Santos Neta*(B.I.A. Nov. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
#### In the Matter of Belinda B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Deutsch, J.), dated September 4, 1985, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated July 1, 1985, made after a hearing finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted assault in the second degree, obstruction of governmental administration, and resisting arrest, placed her on probation until her sixteenth birthday. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated July 1, 1985.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing was sufficient to support the finding that the appellant was guilty of committing the acts charged. Moreover, the appellant’s contention that attempted assault in the second degree against a peace officer is a fictitious crime is without merit *(cf., Matter of Shannon B.,*122 AD2d 268). Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 99.2


CONTACT:  Michael P. Hawks                          (NYSE -- BMC)
          (612) 851-6030                       FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                                       
                              BMC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                         ANNOUNCES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
                          AN INDONESIAN JOINT VENTURE


January 14,1997 -- Minneapolis, MN -- BMC Industries, Inc. today announced 
the establishment of a joint venture company in Jakarta, Indonesia, which 
will operate under the name of P.T. Vision-Ease Asia.  BMC's wholly-owned 
subsidiary, Vision-Ease Lens, Inc., will own 75% of the joint venture's 
outstanding shares and P.T. Astron Lensindo Nusa ("Astron"), an Indonesian 
company, will own the remaining 25%.  The joint venture will manufacture 
glass ophthalmic lenses and supply these lenses to both Vision-Ease and 
Astron. 

Paul B. Burke, BMC's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, stated that "The 
formation of P.T. Vision-Ease Asia is another step in our plan to make 
Vision-Ease into a world- class supplier of ophthalmic products throughout 
the world. We believe this low-cost alternative for glass lens production 
will further enhance our competitiveness in the glass marketplace, where we 
already enjoy a significant share position." 

BMC Industries, Inc. is one of the world's largest manufacturers of aperture 
masks for color picture tubes used in televisions and computer monitors. 
Through Vision-Ease, the Company is also a leading producer of polycarbonate, 
glass and plastic eyewear lenses.  The common stock of the Company is traded 
on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "BMC".
##### 



ANNUAL AGGREGATE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS STATEMENT
MELLON BANK PREMIUM FINANCE LOAN MASTER TRUST SERIES 2004-1
ANNUAL PERIOD ENDING
12/31/2006
 ANNUAL HOLDERS DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY
  Interest PaymentsA. Pursuant to subsection 4.11(g);1. Amount distributed to the Class A Holders
    
    $
    27,372,707.272. Amount distributed to the Class B Holders
    
    $
    1,249,181.013. Amount distributed to the Class C Holders
    
    $
    829,906.834. Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder
    
    
    Principal PaymentsB. Pursuant to subsection 4.11(h)(i);1. Amount distributed to the Class A Holders
    
    $
    0.002. Amount distributed to the Class B Holders
    
    $
    0.003. Amount distributed to the Class C Holders
    
    $
    0.004. Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder
    
    $
    0.00
 MELLON BANK, N.A., as Master ServicerBy
    /s/ James L. JourdainName:
    James L. JourdainTitle:
    Vice President
Mellon Bank, N. A.
#### BABBITT, Appellant, v. GIBBS, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

March, 1894.)

Action by Robert O. Babbitt against William W. Gibbs.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, on referee’s opinion, with costs.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

d0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

141308

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141308 COA: 289299 Wayne CC: 08-010348 RAFAEL BASS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 6, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
(82 South. 894)

#### INTER-SOUTHERN LIFE INS. CO. v. STATE.

(3 Div. 393.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 15, 1919.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.

Helm Bruce, of Louisville, Ky., and Jones, Thomas & Field, of Montgomery, for appellant.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Lawrence E. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by agreement of parties.
### Supporting the fire service through research

In this episode, we talk with Bill Troup about how U.S. Fire Administration research programs are supporting firefighter health and safety and fire mitigation.
Case 7:07-cr-00552-SCR Document 7 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 11

             COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                            INCSTAR CORPORATION

                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                              1996         1995         1994
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Average shares outstanding                  16,480,920  16,362,916   16,322,301
Dilutive stock options and warrants--based
 on the treasury stock method (1)              180,447     128,585           --
                                            16,661,367  16,491,501   16,322,301

  Net income (loss)                        $ 4,112,000 $ 4,263,000  $(4,505,000)

  Net income (loss) per share              $      0.25 $      0.26  $     (0.28)


(1) The effects of stock options and warrants were excluded from the
calculation of weighted average shares outstanding for 1994 because their
effects were antidilutive.
Don’t Wait —

2016 Oct. 6

Check the Date!

Replace Smoke Alarms Every 10 Years

Age matters when it comes to your smoke alarms. 

Check the manufacture dates on your smoke alarms today!

October 6, 2016

years

1Remove the 

smoke alarm 

from the wall 

or ceiling.

2Look at the 

back of the 

alarm for 

the date of 

manufacture.

3Smoke alarms 

should be 

replaced 10 

years from 

the date of 

manufacture.

4Put the alarm 

back on the 

ceiling or wall 

if it is less than 

10 years old.

A closed door may 

slow the spread of 

smoke, heat and fire. 

Test smoke alarms 

at least once a 

month by pushing 

the test button.

Install smoke alarms in every bedroom, outside each separate 

sleeping area, and on every level of the home, including the 

basement. Larger homes may need more alarms. For the best 

protection, make sure all smoke alarms are interconnected. 

When one sounds, they all sound.

If the smoke alarm 

sounds, get outside 

and stay outside. 

Go to your outside 

meeting place.

Call the fire 

department from 

a cellphone or a 

neighbor’s phone. 

Stay outside until 

the fire department 

says it’s safe to go 

back inside.

For more information about smoke alarms, visit usfa.fema.gov and www.nfpa.org.
### How the FDNY is fighting the lithium-ion battery battle

On this episode of The USFA Podcast, FDNY Chief John Hodgens talks about New York City's approach to mitigating residential building fires caused by lithium-ion batteries in micromobility devices.

### Community Risk Reduction

This episode of The USFA Podcast features a discussion on community risk reduction and the Fire Is Everyone's Fight initiative.

### Using NFIRS to fight fire with facts

This episode of The USFA Podcast features Marion Long discussing the value of the National Fire Incident Reporting System to the fire service.
Exhibit 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes John Bekkers and Michael A. Stimpert, or each of them, as attorney-in-fact to sign in his
behalf, individually and in his capacity as a director of Gold Kist Inc., and to file with any federal or state authority Gold Kists annual report on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any amendment to such report.



|                                                  |  |                            |  |              
|------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------
|Signature                                         |  | Title                      |  | Date         
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    DOUGLAS A.
REEVESDouglas A. Reeves         |  | Chairman of the Board      |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    JEFFERY A.
HENDERSONJeffery A. Henderson   |  | Vice Chairman of the Board |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    WALTER C.
DOCKERYWalter C. Dockery         |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    CHRISTOPHER D.
FANNONChristopher D. Fannon |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    DORMAN K.
GRACEDorman K. Grace             |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    FRED W. GRETSCH,
JR.Fred W. Gretsch, Jr.   |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    BILLY G.
MEEKBilly G. Meek                 |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    CHARLES H. MORRIS,
JRCharles H. Morris, Jr |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    PHIL OGLETREE,
JR.Phil Ogletree, Jr.       |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    DAN SMALLEYDan Smalley                     |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
|                                                  |  |                           
|/S/    W. A. SMITHW. A. Smith                     |  | Director                   |  | July 23, 2004
1 ... S eeTex. R. A pp. P. 47. 4. 

# C OURT OFAPPEALS SE CONDDI S T RICTOFT E XAS

FORT W ORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 42 9- CR J UAN M ANU E LL OP E Z AP P E L L ANT V . THE STATE OF TE XA S STATE

----- ----- FR O M CRI M I NA LDI STRI CT CO URT NO . 3 OF T ARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e h aveco ns i der ed t he app e l l a n t ’ s “M ot i on To Di sm i ssA ppe al . ” The m o ti o n c o m p l i e s w i th ru l e 4 2 .2 (a ) o f th e ru l e s o f a p p e l l a te p ro c e d u re . Te x. R. A pp. P. 42 . 2( a) . N o deci sio n o ft hi s courthavi ng been del i ver ed bef or e w e re c e i v e d th i s m o ti o n , w e g ra n t th e m o ti o n a n d d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S ee Te x. R. A pp. P. 4 2 .2 (a ), 4 3 .2 (f). P E R C U R I A M PA N EL: LI V I N G STO N , D A U PH I N O T, an d GA RD N ER, JJ. DO NO T P UBLI SH Tex. R. A pp. P. 47. 2( b)DEL I VERE D: J a nu a r y 15, 2009
VICE CHAIRMAN'S AGREEMENT
                            -------------------------

This  AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of  September  25, 1997,  at Vienna,
Virginia,   by  and  between   Peter  A.  Cohen  ("Vice   Chairman"),   and  GRC
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Company").

In  consideration of the mutual premises,  promises,  covenants,  and agreements
herein contained, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.       The Position of Vice Chairman
         -----------------------------

The Vice Chairman has been elected to the position of Vice Chairman of the Board
of  Directors by the  unanimous  vote of his fellow  directors on September  25,
1997.  The Vice  Chairman  accepts his  election as Vice  Chairman and agrees to
serve as Vice  Chairman  until such time as he chooses to resign or the Board of
Directors elects a new Vice Chairman or decides not to have a Vice Chairman. The
Vice Chairman  will continue to be a member of the Board of Directors,  and will
continue to be an independent  outside director,  in recognition of his being an
independent contractor and not an employee of the Company.

2.       Compensation; Independent Contractor Status
         -------------------------------------------

(a) In  consideration  of the Vice  Chairman's  services as Vice  Chairman,  the
Company has  granted  the Vice  Chairman a 75,000  share  option  under the 1996
Officers  Stock  Option  Plan.  The  Company  shall  pay him no  other  separate
compensation  as Vice  Chairman,  but will pay him the normal Board retainer and
meeting  fees,  after the end of each  quarter.  If the Vice  Chairman  does not
desire to receive his retainer  and/or  meeting fees in the form of cash, he may
elect from time to time to receive  them in other forms under the various  plans
available to the Company's outside  directors.  The Vice Chairman shall continue
to receive  all other  benefits  as may be  received  by the  Company's  outside
directors,  including but not limited to (i) life  insurance,  and (ii) benefits
provided under the Company's Directors  Retirement Plan, as amended,  until such
time as such benefits and/or plans are terminated.  The Vice Chairman shall also
be fully reimbursed for all of his  Company-related  expenses in accordance with
Company policy.

(b) The  parties  agree  that the Vice  Chairman  shall  occupy the status of an
independent contractor, and thus shall be responsible for all tax payments as to
his compensation hereunder.  Inasmuch as the Vice Chairman is not an employee of
the Company,  the Company shall not withhold any income or employment taxes from
his compensation.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first set forth above.

VICE CHAIRMAN:                          GRC INTERNATIONAL, INC.


------------------------------          By:
Peter A. Cohen                             -------------------------------------
                                           Jim Roth
                       President & Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>