alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clear All

        07 March 2024    

                    Expeditionary Medical Unit’s Honduras mission leads to stronger medical partnerships and enhanced readiness                 
                SAN PEDRO SULA, Honduras – Expeditionary Medical Unit (EMU) 10 G-Rotation 16 strengthened health capability and expanded U.S. Navy readiness with Honduran medical professionals during a Global Health Engagement (GHE) in San Pedro Sula, Feb. 17 – March 2, 2024.According to U.S. Navy Capt. Jamie            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05310-AKH Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 32(b) - SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO)


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Annual Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marshall Chadwell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/   Marshall Chadwell
----------------------------
Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
July 29, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 44 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 44 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telecommunications Income Fund XI
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ronald O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company
Leasing, Inc., General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


November 12, 2002                       /s/ Ronald O. Brendengen
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Berthel Fisher & Company Leasing, Inc.
                                        General Partner
                                        Telecommunications Income Fund XI, L.P.


                                       16
A92A0789.

#### THOMAS v. THE STATE.

(422 SE2d 54)

Carley, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of armed robbery. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the trial court on the jury’s verdict of guilt.

*330Decided September 8, 1992.

*Lillian L. Neal,*for appellant.

*Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Todd E. Naugle, Assistant*
      *331
      *District Attorney,*for appellee.

*3301. When viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows the following: Appellant was identified as the man who held a gun to the victim’s head and ordered an accomplice to search the victim’s pockets. The accomplice, who was known to the victim, took $170, and the pair fled. A rational trier of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt of armed robbery beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); *Thompson v. State,*187 Ga. App. 552, 553 (1) (370 SE2d 814) (1988). Accordingly, appellant’s enumeration of the general grounds is without merit.

2. Having been tried separately and convicted, appellant’s accomplice was called as a State’s witness. Despite his previous conviction and the grant of immunity, the accomplice persisted in invoking the Fifth Amendment. Over appellant’s objection, the State was allowed to ask leading questions concerning the testimony given by the accomplice at his trial, which testimony was inculpatory of appellant. After the accomplice refused to answer the State’s leading questions, he was subjected to a thorough and sifting cross-examination by appellant’s counsel. On cross-examination, the accomplice was more forthcoming, clearly intimating that his prior inculpation of appellant had been at the behest of the investigating officers and that someone other than appellant had committed the crime.

Relying upon *Lingerfelt v. State,*235 Ga. 139 (218 SE2d 752) (1975), appellant urges that the trial court erred in allowing the State to ask the leading questions on direct examination of the accomplice. However, *Lingerfelt*is distinguishable and *Cates v. State,*245 Ga. 30, 32 (1) (262 SE2d 796) (1980) controls this issue adversely to appellant’s contentions. See also *Hawkins v. State,*175 Ga. App. 606, 609 (2) (333 SE2d 870) (1985). Unlike *Lingerfelt,*appellant was certainly not denied the right to confront the accomplice. As in *Cates,*it was the direct testimony of the accomplice that was discredited.

3. After the accomplice gave his exculpatory testimony, the State proffered his custodial statement, which was inculpatory of appellant. There was no error in the admission of the accomplice’s statement. See *Burrell v. State,*258 Ga. 841, 843 (5) (376 SE2d 184) (1989).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Johnson, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 31.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Neil Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. As certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and     August 11, 2006/s/ Neil ChristiansenNeil ChristiansenChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 660 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 660

          For the relief of Carlos Espinal Castillo-Reynolds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2009

   Mr. Wamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          For the relief of Carlos Espinal Castillo-Reynolds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CARLOS ESPINAL CASTILLO-
              REYNOLDS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Carlos Espinal Castillo-
Reynolds shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Carlos Espinal Castillo-Reynolds 
enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in 
subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained 
lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment 
of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Carlos Espinal Castillo-
Reynolds, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Carlos 
Espinal Castillo-Reynolds shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
VOLU-SOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   19,497
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            72,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                              2,708
<INVENTORY>                                             169,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        259,116
<PP&E>                                                  426,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                          280,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          428,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   509,582
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                           2,476,069
<COMMON>                                                    269
<OTHER-SE>                                           (2,557,710)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            428,210
<SALES>                                                 250,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        250,860
<CGS>                                                   171,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           679,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       17,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (446,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (446,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (446,841)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    <IT>Name: <RM>Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical 
Systems (1205).
    <IT>Date/Time: <RM>May 17 and 18, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    <IT>Place: <RM>NSF, 4121 Wilson Boulevard, Room 575, Arlington, 
VA.
    <IT>Type of Meeting: <RM>Closed.
    <IT>Contact Person: <RM>Dr. Alison Flatau, Program Director, 
Dynamic Systems and Control. National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Room 545, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8360.
    <IT>Purpose of Meeting: <RM>To provide advice and 
recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial 
support.
    <IT>Agenda: <RM>To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'01 
IIA Control Review Panel as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    <IT>Reason for Closing: <RM>The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 25, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10677 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CERES GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000215403
<NAME> ?????????
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        80,832,097
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        8,899,659
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          9,017,950
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              89,826,188
<CASH>                                      19,376,380
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       3,809,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             180,233,135
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             22,717,862
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                              74,395,205
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        8,845,829
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              8,283,884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,495
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,824,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               180,233,135
<PREMIUMS>                                 160,784,897
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          7,454,180
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             210,857
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,696,690
<BENEFITS>                                 116,058,675
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    647,271
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        56,209,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,768,771)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,066,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,835,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,835,659)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998 
<CASH>                                                  109 
<SECURITIES>                                              0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3,048 
<ALLOWANCES>                                            150 
<INVENTORY>                                           3,943 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      8,195 
<PP&E>                                                6,874 
<DEPRECIATION>                                        4,482 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       11,373 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 8,154 
<BONDS>                                                   0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0 
<PREFERRED>                                               0 
<COMMON>                                                633 
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,585 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         11,373 
<SALES>                                              16,731 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     16,731 
<CGS>                                                10,745 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        10,745 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     10,972 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         13 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      345 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (5,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (1,813)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (3,518)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0 
<CHANGES>                                                 0 
<NET-INCOME>                                         (3,518)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (2.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (2.82)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT (21)



                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



     The  registrant has no "parent" as such as defined by the Securities Act of
1933,  as  amended.  All  subsidiaries  of the  Registrant  are  included in the
consolidated financial statements:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               Percentage        Jurisdiction
                                                  of                 of
                                               Ownership        Incorporation
                                               ---------        -------------
<S>                                               <C>              <C>
Piedmont Trust Bank                               100%             Virginia
Bank of Carroll                                   100%             Virginia
Bank of Ferrum                                    100%             Virginia
First Community Bank                              100%             Virginia
The First Bank of Stuart                          100%             Virginia
First Community Bank of Saltville                 100%             Virginia
First National Bank of Clifton Forge              100%             United States
Hanover Bank                                      100%             Virginia
MainStreet Trust Company, N.A.                    100%             United States
</TABLE>