alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Tracy E. Ohmart, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/  TRACY E. OHMART         |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Tracy E. Ohmart                   |
| Chief Financial Officer           |
| TEPPCO  GP, Inc., General Partner |

 
| November 1, 2005 |   |
|------------------|--------|
| Date             |

 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership and will beretained by TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

 FULLER

 

 V

 NOTICE OF

 INTERVIEW, INC. REASSIGNMENT 

 

 

 

 

07-CV-5728

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the aboveentitled action is reassigned to the calendar of

 JUDGE SULLIVAN

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the

Clerk’s Office of the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the

assigned judge’s initials after the case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the

Notice of Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Date: 9/11/07

By: Juliaann Scheib

 Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-05728-RJS-DCF Document 7 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cv-05728-RJS-DCF Document 7 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BICO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Richard M. Greenwood, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: April 3, 2006

/s/  Richard M. Greenwood
-----------------------------
     Richard M. Greenwood,
     Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of ProQuest Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/ Alan W. Aldworth                
|Alan W. Aldworth,                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



March 17, 2005
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

JAIME ROJAS (AND WIFE, JOHANNA 

HERNANDEZ) 

NOTICE OP THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 4511 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC Co. LLC 

f/k/a WFP Tower A Co. L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC G.P. Corp. f/k/a WFP 

Tower A Co. GP Corp., BFP Tower C Co. LLC, BFP Tower C MM LLC and WFP 

Retail Co. L.P. (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the 

Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield 

Parties' Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed 

in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 50 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October IR 2007 

Faust, Goetz, scbea~er & Blee, LLP 

: WilCliam J. Smit~~SWJS·9137) 

ttorneirs for the Brookfield Parties 

tor Street, 20fh Floor 

New'Pork, NY 10006 

i212) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 50 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### BETHMAR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. CENTURY HARDWARE CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendant.

No. 71-C-610.

United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

Feb. 4, 1972.

Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren & Norris by Paul V. Lucke, and William R. Steinmetz, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

Burton A. Strnad, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge

The defendant has moved to disrr the third and fourth claims of the plaint and also to have certain *r*
      *734of the first claim made more definite and certain. I have concluded that the latter motion should be granted and that the motion to dismiss should be denied.

The third cause of action seeks damages for the defendant’s alleged failure to purchase from the plaintiff the fasteners which the defendant required for its own use in the ordinary course of its business. The defendant urges that this claim for relief must fail because of an absence of mutuality of obligation and also because this portion of the agreement does not contain “sufficient specificity.” I find no merit in these arguments. The entire agreement is an elaborately drawn document. In my opinion, there is ample consideration in the document, viewed as a whole, to support a claim that the defendant was required to purchase from the plaintiff those fasteners which it, as a going concern, would normally use in the ordinary course of its business. Levin v. Perkins, 12 Wis.2d 398, 107 N.W.2d 492 (1961).

I reject, however, the plaintiff’s contention that the agreement can be construed as *obligating*the plaintiff to sell except when the pricing formula produces a sales price less than the plaintiff’s costs. The latter interpretation is contradicted by the express language of the agreement which asserts that Bethmar “shall not be obliged to sell fasteners” to Century.

There are portions of the fourth claim which clearly qualify as sufficient to withstand the defendant’s motion to dismiss. I have, however, doubts about the adequacy of paragraphs 25(e) and (f); paragraph 25(g) seems to be redundant because of the existence of the third claim for relief. However, the other portions of paragraph 25 assert cognizable claims of contract violation, and, thus, the fourth claim may not be dismissed.

The defendant is entitled to a more definite statement regarding those pox'tions of paragraph ten of the first claim for relief, to which the defendant’s motion is directed. The defendant is entitled to know in what respects it allegedly “otherwise repudiated the contract” and also to know what conditions the plaintiff refers to when it avers that the “defendant refused to perform other conditions.”

Therefore, it is ordered that the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s third and fourth claims for relief be and hereby is denied.

It is also ordered that the defendant’s motion for a more definite statement as to the plaintiff’s first claim for relief be and hereby is granted.
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of Intelligent Communication Enterprise Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bala Balamurali, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Bala Balamurali


Bala Balamurali


Chief Executive Officer


April 15, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed April 16 , 2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00239

- CV

____________ IN RE KIMBERLY ANN JACSON , Relator

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 387th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- DCV

- 270713



### ORDER

On March 27, 2020 , this court issued an order staying the portion of the associate judge’s oral temporary order s for relator to “vacate the home by 6 p.m. on2 March 28th of 2020

. ” T he district court has set a de novo hearing on the associate judge’s temporary orders for May 11 , 2020

. 1
After the de novo hearing has occurred and the district judge has ruled on the issues presented by relator, the parties shall provide to this court a written status report of the events occurring in the trial court. The status report shall be filed no
later than 24 hours after the district judge has ruled

.
PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.

1 We note that the mandamus record does not contain a ny memorialization of the oral temporary orders signed by the associate judge.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11162]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provision of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' 
(5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b), notice is hereby given of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board's (Board) meeting described below.

TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 9 a.m., May 23, 2001.

PLACE: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Public Hearing 
Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Department of Energy (DOE) requires 
contractors at defense nuclear facilities to develop and implement 
nuclear quality assurance programs to ensure the requisite quality of 
operations, products, and services that directly affect nuclear safety-
related systems and operations. Activities required to be conducted 
under established quality assurance programs extend from scientific 
studies, to the design, construction, operation, and deactivation of 
defense nuclear facilities. Notwithstanding contract and rule 
requirements concerning quality assurance, there is evidence that 
quality assurance programs at defense nuclear facilities are not 
consistently achieving their quality objectives.
    This is the second in a series of open meetings being held by the 
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) on the topic of quality 
assurance within DOE nuclear defense activities. Board inquiries will 
address (1) quality assurance requirements and practices in related 
industries, and (2) the implementation of DOE quality assurance 
requirements at selected sites.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Azzaro, General Counsel, 
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 
700, Washington, DC 20004, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 
reserves its right to further schedule and otherwise regulate the 
course of this meeting, to recess, reconvene, postpone or adjourn the 
meeting, and otherwise exercise its authority under the Atomic Energy 
Act of 1954, as amended.

    Dated: April 30, 2001.
John T. Conway,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 01-11162 Filed 4-30-01; 4:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
# CE2010224EN.01003901.xml

| 19.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 224/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 224/39

---

Monday 14 September 2009Approval of the appointment of Algirdas Šemeta as a member of the Commission

P7_TA(2009)0003

European Parliament decision of 14 September 2009 approving the appointment of Mr Algirdas Šemeta as a Member of the Commission

2010/C 224 E/12

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to Article 214(2), third subparagraph, and Article 215 of the EC Treaty,

having regard to point 4 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission (1),

1

having regard to the resignation of Dalia Grybauskaitė as a Member of the Commission, tendered on 25 June 2009,

having regard to the nomination by the Government of Lithuania of Algirdas Šemeta for appointment as a Member of the Commission,

having regard to Council Decision 2009/507/EC, Euratom of 30 June 2009 appointing a new Member of the Commission of the European Communities (2),

2

having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 9 July 2009 concerning the procedure to be applied for the replacement of Commissioners,

having regard to the exchange of views between the Commissioner-designate and its committee responsible held on 1 September 2009,

having regard to Rule 106 and Annex XVII, point 2, second paragraph, of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Approves the appointment of Algirdas Šemeta as a Member of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission's term of office, until 31 October 2009; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the appointment of Algirdas Šemeta as a Member of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission's term of office, until 31 October 2009;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 117 E, 18.5.2006, p. 123.

1

(2)  OJ L 172, 2.7.2009, p. 34.

2

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.27


                 SUMMARY OF 1999 SENIOR EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN


         A bonus equal to 50% of Dennis Ganster's base compensation and 40% of
the base compensation of the other senior executives is payable for the fiscal
year 1999 upon achievement of performance goals. Fifty percent of the bonus is
payable upon achievement of targeted revenue growth and fifty percent is payable
upon achievement of targeted earnings per share levels (or, in some cases,
twenty-five percent upon achievement of targeted earnings per share and
twenty-five percent upon achievement of targeted profit levels at the operation
for which the executive is responsible). Additional bonus amounts may be paid,
at the discretion of the Compensation Committee if the target is exceeded.
Twenty-five percent of the bonus is payable in Common Stock, up to a maximum of
25,000 shares. The remainder of the bonus is payable in cash. Participating
senior executives must be employed by the Company at the date of the payment of
the bonus.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of ImageEntertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscalyear ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Avagliano, ChiefOperating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)                                  Based on my knowledge, theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   July 29, 2010 |   | /s/  JOHN P. AVAGLIANO                               |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | John  P. Avagliano                                   |
|                                 |   | Chief  Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          18,157
<SECURITIES>                                    17,910
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                       540
<INVENTORY>                                     12,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,775
<PP&E>                                          89,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,098
<BONDS>                                          8,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,236
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,279
<SALES>                                        324,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               324,168
<CGS>                                          192,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               114,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,839
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,122
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,717
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.27


</TABLE>