alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                      Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     I, Juanita H. Hinshaw, Senior Vice President and Principal
Financial Officer of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. ("the Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
           annual period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
           complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
           the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results
           of operations of the Company.




/s/ Juanita H. Hinshaw
----------------------
Juanita H. Hinshaw
Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer



March 28, 2005
# C_2009195EN.01000801.xml

| 19.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/8

---

Commission communication cancelling and replacing Communication No 178/05 of 31 July 2009 on the body authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under Regulation (EC) No 620/2009

2009/C 195/03

By Council Regulation (EC) No 617/2009 of 13 July 2009, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union L 182 of 15 July 2009, an import tariff quota for high quality beef has been opened.

Official Journal of the European Union

Under Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 620/2009 of 13 July 2009, the release for free circulation of the goods imported under that quota is conditional upon presentation of a certificate of authenticity.

The following authority is authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under the Regulation.

| Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) |
| --- |
| Washington D.C., 20250 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |

Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

Washington D.C., 20250

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7719

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID TYRONE HALL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR98-192-CCB; CA-03-2911-CCB) Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Tyrone Hall, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David Tyrone Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief Executive
Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
      David G.
      DerrickDavid
      G. DerrickChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Michael G.
      ActonMichael
      G. ActonChief
      Financial Officer
 
 Dated:
February 9, 2009
 
 This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 0557 LT Case No. 2009

- CA

- 059440

_____________________________ S HONTE L. B UNCH , as Personal Representative of the Estate of Martorell Isasa Williams, J r ., Appellant,

v.

P ILOT T RAVEL C ENTER , LLC, SSA D ELAWARE , LLC, and N ORTHLAKE F OODS , I NC

. D / B / A W AFFLE H OUSE , I NC ., D / B / A W AFFLE H OUSE , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County

. George Paulk , Judge

. Tyrone A. King , of King & Markman, P.A.
, Orlando , for Appellant.

Edgardo Ferreyra and Laurette A. Balinsky , of Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo, Cohen & Peterfriend
, Orlando , for Appellee s

. January 23, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
E DWARDS , C.J.
, M AKAR , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,267,840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,262,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,872,207
<PP&E>                                     228,944,968
<DEPRECIATION>                              (5,485,448)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             253,617,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,159,563
<BONDS>                                    116,484,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,081
<OTHER-SE>                                 135,158,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               253,617,394
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,035,631
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,196,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,239,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,548,477
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,548,477
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (336,875)
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,211,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21001-21002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Review of Conference Grants (R13s).
    Date: May 25, 2001.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS-East Campus, Building 4401, Conference Room 122, 79 
Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institutes of Environmental Health 
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD/EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, 919/541-4964.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Review of Conference Grants (R13s).
    Date: May 31, 2001.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS-East Campus, Building 4401, Conference Room 122, 79 
Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institutes of Environmental Health 
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD/EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, 919/541-4964.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS 
Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS

[[Page 21002]]

Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic Research and Education; 
93.894, Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental 
Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10355 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           30000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   130000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                169000
<PP&E>                                          315000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  301000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  294000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           133000
<BONDS>                                         866000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        155000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    294000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   212000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (206000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    241000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     35000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Exhibit 32.1]



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 8, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|Med Gen, Inc.          
|(Registrant)           
|                       
|By: /s/ Paul B. Kravitz
|Paul B. Kravitz        
|Chief Executive Officer
A92A0591.

#### FORD v. THE STATE.

(421 SE2d 294)

Andrews, Judge.

Ford was convicted for violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act and appeals.

1. In her first enumeration of error, Ford contends that the trial court erred in ruling that her statements were voluntary and admissible because she was not properly notified of her constitutional rights pursuant to *Miranda v. Arizona,*384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). Pretermitting the issue of whether Ford properly challenged the voluntariness of the statements at trial, we find this enumeration without merit.

The court conducted a hearing regarding the statements and testimony from the investigating officer was that pursuant to receiving a search warrant, he went to Ford’s house. He entered, introduced himself and stated his purpose, and asked if the defendant had any cocaine that was hers in the house. She admitted that she did and pro*13duced the drug, whereupon the officer immediately advised her of her rights, whereupon she made more statements. Defendant was arrested several months later.

Decided June 16, 1992

Reconsideration dismissed July 14, 1992.

*Richard L. Dickson, J. Michael Mullís,*for appellant.

*Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, James B. McClung, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Appellant’s arguments that her statements and actions prior to the giving of the *Miranda*warnings were inadmissible because the officer’s inquiry exceeded the scope of initial investigation and because she was in custody at the time are meritless. “Threshold inquiries of the type to which appellant apparently objects do not fall within the custodial interrogation protections afforded by the Miranda rule. [Cits.]” *Birge v. State,*143 Ga. App. 632, 637 (8) (239 SE2d 395) (1977); see also *Riviera v. State,*190 Ga. App. 823 (1) (380 SE2d 353) (1989); *Scoggins v. State,*191 Ga. App. 643 (382 SE2d 695) (1989). “A person is not entitled to *Miranda*warnings as a matter of right, even though that person is a suspect, unless that person had been taken into custody or has been deprived of freedom of action in another significant way. Although the focus of the investigation may be on defendant, [s]he must also be in a custodial situation for *Miranda*to apply.” (Punctuation and citations omitted.) *Brinson v. State,*191 Ga. App. 151, 152 (4) (381 SE2d 292) (1989); compare *State v. Nelson,*261 Ga. 246 (1) (404 SE2d 112) (1991). Such a situation was missing here and there was no error in the trial court’s decision.

2. In her second enumeration of error, Ford contends that the evidence was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). Our review of the transcript reveals ample evidence from which any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was guilty of the offense of which she was convicted.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*
# CE2010224EN.01004001.xml

| 19.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 224/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 224/40

---

Monday 14 September 2009Approval of the appointment of Pawel Samecki as a member of the Commission

P7_TA(2009)0004

European Parliament decision of 14 September 2009 approving the appointment of Mr Paweł Samecki as a Member of the Commission

2010/C 224 E/13

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to Article 214(2), third subparagraph, and Article 215 of the EC Treaty,

having regard to point 4 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission (1),

1

having regard to the resignation of Danuta Hübner as a Member of the Commission, tendered on 24 June 2009,

having regard to the nomination by the Government of Poland of Paweł Samecki for appointment as a Member of the Commission,

having regard to Council Decision 2009/528/EC, Euratom of 3 July 2009 appointing a new Member of the Commission of the European Communities (2),

2

having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 9 July 2009 concerning the procedure to be applied for the replacement of Commissioners,

having regard to the exchange of views between the Commissioner-designate and its committee responsible held on 2 September 2009,

having regard to Rule 106 and Annex XVII, point 2, second paragraph, of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Approves the appointment of Paweł Samecki as a Member of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission's term of office, until 31 October 2009; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the appointment of Paweł Samecki as a Member of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission's term of office, until 31 October 2009;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 117 E, 18.5.2006, p. 123.

1

(2)  OJ L 178, 9.7.2009, p. 16.

2

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2018

No. 04-18-00827-CR

Jake Eric ALVARADO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-05-11973-CR

Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s brief is due to be filed in each of these appeals on January 2, 2019. 

Appellant’s attorney has filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to file the brief 

requesting a sixty-day extension of time due to his workload. This court generally grants 

extensions in thirty-day increments; however, the motion is GRANTED. Because this order 

grants a sixty-day extension, THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE 

APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED. The Appellant’s brief must be filed by March 2, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
[Exhibit 32.1]

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Med
Gen, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

    (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date: July 30, 2005

                                       /s/ PAUL B. KRAVITZ
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Paul B. Kravitz
                                       Chief Executive Officer