alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Clickable
      Enterprises, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Nicholas Cirillo, Jr., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.




*Date: August 30, 2007*/s/ *Nicholas
              Cirillo, Jr.**Nicholas Cirillo,
              Jr.**President (Principal
              Executive
              Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





22
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the sole
general partner of TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TE Products Pipeline
Company, Limited Partnership and will be retained by TE Products Pipeline
Company, Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. April 29, 2004Date/s/ CHARLES H. LEONARDCharles H. LeonardSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerTEPPCO GP, Inc., General Partner
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         941,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,068,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,772,871
<PP&E>                                     223,653,946
<DEPRECIATION>                              (8,159,451)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             255,261,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,151,655
<BONDS>                                    116,284,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,081
<OTHER-SE>                                 134,738,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               255,261,813
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,631,364
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,350,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (625,647)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,546,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,510,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,510,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,510,797
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 1 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 2 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 3 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 4 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 5 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 6 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 7 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 8 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 9 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 10 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 11 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 12 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-04506-AKH     Document 20-3      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 13 of 13
#### EAGEN v. LAZARUS.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

January 17, 1914.)

No. 1803.

Appeal from the District Court- of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania;, Chas. B. Witmer, Judge. Action by G. F. Lazarus, as trustee in bankruptcy against James Eagen. Judgment for plaintiff (206 Fed. 518), and defendant appeals.

Modified.

Abram Salsburg, of Wilkes-Barre, Pa., and C. B. Little, of Scranton, Pa., for appellant.

Burton W. Davis, of Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for appellee.

Before GRAY, BUFFINGTON, and McPHERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside

a preferential transfer of property. It was brought in equity, instead of at *1005law, because a transfer of real estate was involved, and the trustee proceeded upon the theory that a reconveyance might be necessary as a part of the relief. In view of the admissions made by the plaintiff in error, we need not recount the facts. He concedes that in' effect a preferential payment of $500 was made, and (in order to avoid further litigation) he also states that he has no objection to a decree being entered for that sum. This relieves us from discussing the case, for we agree that this amount is the proper measure of his liability. We therefore direct that the decree below be so modified as to order James Eagen to pay to the trustee, within a reasonable time to be fixed by the District Court, the sum of $500, with interest from October 18, 1911. And we further direct that the costs of this court be paid by the bankrupt estate, and that the costs below be divided equally between the estate and James Eagen.
#### TIMOTHY A. CALABRESE *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*Jodi Zils Gagne,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Melissa L. Streeto Brechlin,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May *4,*2005

The petitioner Timothy A. Calabrese’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 144 (AC 24679), is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001045260
<NAME>                        AUGUST PROJECT 1 CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              25,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       (30,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            0
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   25,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (25,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (25,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (25,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.01)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.1**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Voyager Learning Company: 

Under date of August 31, 2007, we reported on theconsolidated balance sheets of Voyager Learning Company (formerly known as ProQuest Company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity(deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In connection with ouraudits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule in Item 15(a)2. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. 

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, whenconsidered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Voyager Learning Company restated its previously issued financial statements as of January 1, 2005 and for each of the years in the two-year periodended January 1, 2005. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Detroit, Michigan

August 31, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

Pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, and the President's Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), as implemented by General Services Administration (GSA) Order PBS P 1095.4D, GSA announces its Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS for the proposed development and future build out for the CDC in Chamblee, Georgia. The proposed action includes the expansion of facilities and will include additional buildings, parking structures, and infrastructure on Government-owned property located in Chamblee located south of Tucker Road between Peachtree Dekalb Airport and Buford Highway. The EIS will examine the impacts of this proposed development on the natural and human environment to include impacts to wetlands, floodplains, traffic, and other potential impacts identified by the community through the scoping process.

The EIS will address the potential impacts of two alternatives: the Proposed Action (Development Alternative), and No-Action Alternative (meet facility requirements without full development on site). GSA will solicit community input throughout this process, and will incorporate community comments into the decision process. As part of the Public Scoping process, GSA solicits comments in writing at the following address: Mr. Phil Youngberg, Environmental Manager (4PT), General Services Administration (GSA), 77 Forsyth Street, Suite 450, Atlanta, GA 30303 or Fax: Mr. Phil Youngberg at 404-562-0790. Comments should be submitted in writing no later than June 1st, 2001.

Dated: April 18, 2001.

Phil Youngberg,

Environmental Manager (4PT), General Services Administration.

[FR Doc. 01-11147  Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-23-M
Case 1:07-cv-05732-GBD     Document 13      Filed 10/12/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 20      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 20      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.2



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         I, D. Beatty D'Alessandro, Senior Vice President and Principal
Financial Officer of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. ("the Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

         (1)    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual
                period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




/s/ D. Beatty D'Alessandro
--------------------------
D. Beatty D'Alessandro
Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer

March 12, 2008
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
Building on FEMA’s 2022-2026 Strategic Plan, the USFA is leading by example and setting the standard for fire and EMS throughout the country.

## Federal Emergency Management Agency strategic framework

Building the FEMA our nation needs and deserves.

Goal 1:

#### Instill equity as a foundation of emergency management

              - Cultivate a FEMA that prioritizes and harnesses a diverse workforce.
              - Remove barriers to FEMA programs through a “people first” approach.
              - Achieve equitable outcomes for those we serve.

----

Goal 2:

#### Lead whole of community in climate resilience

              - Increase climate literacy among the emergency management community.
              - Build a climate resilient nation.
              - Empower risk-informed decision making.

----

Goal 3:

#### Promote and sustain a ready FEMA and prepared nation

              - Strengthen the emergency management workforce.
              - Posture FEMA to meet current and emergent threats.
              - Unify coordination and delivery of federal assistance.

## U.S. Fire Administration strategic framework

This strategic plan creates a platform for the USFA to achieve its vision and mission. The plan provides both strategic direction and operational focus.

America’s fire and EMS progress is greatly enhanced by the USFA’s efforts to take the lead on issues important to the fire service. The strategic goals are the foundation for our work towards a **fire-safe America**.
EXHIBIT 23.2




















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-37261, 33-69596, 33-69598, 33-61558, 333-79443, 333-08994,
333-42635, 333-89971, 333-112527,333-138524, 333-162898 and 333-162897) and Form
S-3 (No. 333-162896) of Southern Union Company of our report dated February 25,
2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Citrus Corp., which
appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP








Houston,
Texas


March 1,
2010
National Fire Academy

Application Cover Sheet — Off-campus Courses

NFA state/local partner-sponsored and approved courses

(O-coded courses/Y-coded courses)

Within 3-7 days of delivery, please scan and email this completed form and 

completed applications to:

netcadmissions@fema.dhs.gov

State/local partner-sponsored: (State provides instructors; they teach National Fire Academy (NFA)-

developed courses.) All state/local partner-sponsored 2-, 6- and 10-day courses will now be coded with 

the letter designation of “O” for off-site.

Approved courses are coded as “Y.” (These are state-developed/NFA-approved courses. The state 

provides instructors and materials).

Course code and title: 

Course start date:

Course end date:

Dates of course:

Course length (hours/days): 

Delivery site (city/state):

Instructor name:

Number of students:

Point of contact/phone no.: 

Point of contact email:

State fire training agency (director) signature:

Instructors: Please ensure that all applications contain the following:

• FEMA Student Identification (SID) number. This number is required in order for the 

application to be entered. Failure to provide this number may result in the student not 

receiving credit for the course. If the student needs assistance, please have them contact 

the SID HelpDesk at femasidhelpdesk@cdpemail.dhs.gov or by calling 866-291-0696.

• Email address. The student’s email is required because certificates are emailed directly to 

the student after the application has been entered in the admissions database.

Admissions Use Only

Date applications received:
#                                                                         Navy Entomologists Train With Largest Mosquito Control Program in U.S.                                                                    

##### by Lt.j.g. Victoria Wong

04 August 2022JACKSONVILLE , Fla. -- 

Tags:
**Navy medicine**MOSQUITO**Entomologist
### GEHALDc'. WAWN A~J- aa. TEgas .~

m2?,.. 19~9 s.
‘3. Hon. Carl Per&, ~CountyAttorney Hall county Memphis, Texas Dea+.Sir: 1’

. ; opinion RO. 4-j-i-g ' " :.: Re: Duty o? "pl.$y to cafis work+?n's

. ,C~pa$f* +mmsice on its em-,

.,, pxyey3t;;] '; : ',I,): ". Your requ& for e.nopFnion upon the following questioq: Ye it the duty of the county or of ‘the rosa preclncts’to ’ carry employers liability insurance for the protection of road worlollenarid the county”? has been received by this department.

Tex. Jur., Vol. 

### 45,, p. 

### 455, Sec. 69 - Worhmen’s Compensat$on - States, Count&es and Ci$ieSj reads a8 **follows:** W ’

. .’

“The c&upensatLon law was obviously Intended to apply to ’lnduetrlal employment. It does not apply to states, countGee or cities in their performance of governmental funct&x!s

. ‘

. . By a constitutional amendmentadopted Sowember 

### 3; 1936, (Art. 

### 3, Sec. 59) the legislature ls’glven power to pans ‘m&h laws as maybe necessary to provide for Workmen’s Compensation Insurance for such state employees, as in Its judgment is necessary ‘or required; aud to provide for the payment of all costs, charges, and premiums on such policies of Insurance; providing the atate,, @all never,,be’ required to purchase insurance for any employee; f ” ‘~ ” ~. Article 

### 3, Section 59, Constitution of Texas, reads as follows:

“The Legislature ~&all have power, to pas8 euch laws a8 maybe necessary to provide for Workmen’8 Compensation Insurance for such Btate employees, as in Its judgment Is necessary or required; and to provide for the payment of all costs, charges and premiums on, such policies of ineurance;,prov$ding that the state shall never be required to purchase insurance for any employee.” .Eon. Carl Periman, Way24, 

### 1939, Pme 

### 2 (O-779)

Pursuant to the constitutio~l authority of Article 

### 3, Section 59, Texan Conntitdion, the Legislature on June ll, 1937, paeqed Article 66748, which provide6 for Workmen'8 Compeneatian ~amsnce for employeea ofthe Texae State Highway Department. Under thle act the HighwayDepartment Is aelf-insuring and carries Its own insurance as net out in the' Statute. The Iegis&ature haa not extended the benefits of Wor@ea's CompenSatiou limurance to any other bodies or departmenta of the state government than the Texas State Highway Department.

The county and its political subdivlslone are protected by their sovereignty. The law does not require the Conml+oners' Court to take out insurance. You gre, therefore,'~~epectf&lly advised that it 1s the opinion of this department t-t it is not$$he duty of the county 9r op the road precinct to carry employer'8 liabllitg insurance for the pro$ectlon of road workmen or the county.

Trustlng,that,thls auyra ~om,,inqu@y, we are Very, SW-y yours

WJF:onib:llu APPROVF8D: /a/ Qeraid.$'. Mann' ATTORlEi- OFTEXAS, ATroRwEY GENERAL

OFTEXAS
By Is/ Wm.J. Fatn$ng

Wm.J. Fanqing " Asslstimt
APPROVED OPIWION doMMmEE BY CHAIRMAN