alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#                                                                         NIWC Atlantic Team Trains Reserve Sailors in Defensive Cyber Operations                                                                    

##### by Kris Patterson, NIWC Atlantic Public Affairs

05 December 2023

                    NIWC Atlantic Team Trains Reserve Sailors in Defensive Cyber Operations                                            1 of 2                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    NIWC Atlantic Team Trains Reserve Sailors in Defensive Cyber Operations                                            2 of 2                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

**About NIWC Atlantic**

Tags:
**NIWC Atlantic**CSSP**Cyber Security Service Provider**GIBSON CASTLE 23
##  

## **BMC**

| **BMC Industries, Inc.**One Meridian Crossings, Suite 850  Minneapolis, MN 55423  Web site   www.bmcind.com |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** NEWS RELEASE**
| CONTACT: | BRADLEY D. CARLSON | (NYSE: BMM)            |
|----------|--------------------|------------------------|
|     | (952)  851-6020    | FOR  IMMEDIATE RELEASE |

**BMC INDUSTRIES ANNOUNCES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND**

February 15, 2002 ‐‐Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA -- On February 14, 2002, BMC Industries, Inc.'s(NYSE: BMM) Board of Directors approved a continuation of its quarterly cashdividend of $.0025 per share.

Shareholders of record as ofMarch 20, 2002 will receive a dividend of $.0025 for each share owned on thatdate, to be paid on April 4, 2002.

BMC Industries, founded in 1907, is comprised of twobusiness segments: Buckbee-Mears and Optical Products.  The Buckbee-Mears group, through its MaskOperations, is the only independent North American manufacturer of aperturemasks.  The Buckbee-Mears group, throughits Micro-Technology Operations, is also a leading producer of a variety ofprecision photo-etched and electroformed components that require fine features andtight tolerances.

TheOptical Products group, operating under the Vision-Ease trade name, is aleading designer, manufacturer and distributor of polycarbonate, glass andhard-resin plastic eyewear lenses. Vision-Ease is a technology and market share leader in the polycarbonatelens segment of the market. Polycarbonate lenses are thinner and lighter than lenses made of othermaterials, while providing inherent ultraviolet (UV) filtering and impactresistant characteristics.

BMC Industries, Inc. is tradedon the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "BMM."  For more information about BMC Industries,Inc., visit the Company's Web site at www.bmcind.com.

 

 

-30-
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of Image Entertainment,
Inc.; and
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
 Date: July 29, 2009
    /s/ JEFF M. FRAMERJeff M. FramerPresident and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009031EN.01000101.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/1

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the State aid assessment criteria of the Commission communication on certain legal aspects relating to cinematographic and other audiovisual works (Cinema Communication) of 26 September 2001

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 31/01)

As announced in its 2004 (1) and 2007 (2) Communications extending the validity of the State aid assessment criteria of the 2001 Cinema Communication (3), the Commission has carried out an extensive study into the economic and cultural impact of territorial spending obligations imposed in film support schemes. The study was launched on 24 August 2006 (4) and a stakeholders' workshop was held in Brussels on 6 July 2007. The results of the study were published on 22 May 2008 (5).

1

2

3

4

5

The final report of the study was not conclusive about the economic or cultural impact of territorial spending obligations in film support schemes, one way or the other. Therefore, the results underline the need for further reflection before proposing a modification of the existing State aid assessment criterion in the 2001 Cinema Communication concerning territorial spending obligations, compatible with the fundamental principles of the Treaty.

In the Commission's view, the current State aid assessment criteria can continue for the time being to promote cultural creation and will ensure that the aid granted to film and audiovisual production does not affect competition and trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest. However, a number of different trends have emerged since the 2001 Cinema Communication which will require some refinement of these criteria in due course.

These trends include support for aspects other than film and TV production (such as film distribution and digital projection), more regional film support schemes, as well as competition among some Member States to use State aid to attract inward investment from large-scale, mainly US, film production companies. These are complex issues which will require reflection with the Member States and national and regional film support bodies to develop appropriate criteria.

Consequently, the Commission has decided to continue to apply the current criteria until such time as new rules on State aid to cinematographic and other audiovisual works come into effect, or, at the latest, until 31 December 2012.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 134, 16.6.2007, p. 5.

2

(3)  OJ C 43, 16.2.2002, p. 6.

3

(4)  OJ S 173, 12.9.2006, reference 2006/S 173-183834.

4

(5)  http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/info_centre/library/studies/index_en.htm#finalised

5

---
#                                                                         USS Albany Arrives in Faslane, Scotland                                                                    

##### by  U.S. Naval Forces Europe and Africa / U.S. Sixth Fleet Public Affairs

17 April 2024
The Los Angeles-class attack submarine USS Albany (SSN 753) arrived in Faslane, Scotland for a scheduled port visit, April 17, 2024.

This port visit to Faslane reinforces the United States’ commitment to our Allies and partners in the region and gives Albany and her crew the opportunity to enjoy the history and culture of the region. The U.S. and U.K. regularly work alongside each other through exercises and operations in support of Allied and partner interests.

Fast-attack submarines are multi-mission platforms enabling five of the six Navy maritime strategy core capabilities - sea control, power projection, forward presence, maritime security and deterrence. They are designed to excel in anti-submarine warfare, anti-ship warfare, strike warfare, special operations, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, irregular warfare and mine warfare. Fast-attack submarines project power ashore with special operations forces and Tomahawk cruise missiles in the prevention or preparation of regional crises.

Albany was commissioned in 1990 and is one of 62 completed submarines of the Los Angeles-class. The Los Angeles class contains more nuclear submarines than any other class in the world. The class was preceded by the Sturgeon class and followed by the Seawolf. Except for USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN 709), all submarines of this class are named after American cities and a few towns (e.g. Key West, Florida, and Greeneville, Tennessee).

Commander, Task Force 69 is responsible for submarine warfare operations in the U.S. European Command and U.S. African Command areas of responsibility.

For over 80 years, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has forged strategic relationships with allies and partners, leveraging a foundation of shared values to preserve security and stability.

Headquartered in Naples, Italy, NAVEUR-NAVAF operates U.S. naval forces in the U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) and U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) areas of responsibility. U.S. Sixth Fleet is permanently assigned to NAVEUR-NAVAF, and employs maritime forces through the full spectrum of joint and naval operations.
Exhibit  21




The company's subsidiaries are:

              Name                                    State of Incorporation
  _________________________________                   ______________________
  
  Equitable Investment Services, Inc.                            Iowa
  Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa                       Iowa
  Equitable of Iowa Securities Network, Inc.                     Iowa
  Locust Street Securities, Inc.                                 Iowa


All are wholly-owned.

USG Annuity & Life Company, an Oklahoma corporation, and Equitable American
Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation, are wholly-owned subsidiaries of
Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa.  In addition, these entities own
other subsidiaries which are not considered in the aggregate to be a
significant subsidiary as defined in Securities and Exchange Commission
rules.

All subsidiaries do business only under their corporate names.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 15

- 1407 Filed May 25, 2016

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. DAWN MARIE LIENAU , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cedar County, Marlita A. Greve , Judge.

A defendant appeals her conviction alleging her counsel was ineffective.
AFFIRMED.

Jeffrey L. Powell of the Law Office of Jeffrey L. Powell , Washington , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Martha E. Trout , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Doyle and Bower, JJ.2

VOGEL, Presiding Judge. Dawn Lienau pled guilty to driving while barred. She appeals her conviction asserting her counsel provided ineffective assistance. She claims by pleading guilty she is now prohibited from challenging an evidentiary ruling of the court that allowed the State to admit her certified driving record into evidence in lieu of live testimony from an employee of the department of transportation to prove she was barred from operating a motor vehicle. She claims counsel knew she wanted to appeal the district court’s ruling, an d thus, counsel should not have advised her to plead guilty. It is her belief that counsel simply did not recognize the legal implications of pleading guilty. She asks that we vacate her conviction and allow her to withdraw her guilty plea based on couns el’s ineffectiveness. Our review of an ineffective

- assistance claim is de novo. State v. Tompkins , 859 N.W.2d 631, 636 (Iowa 2015). To prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Lienau must prove counsel failed to perform an essential duty an d this failure resulted in prejudice. See id . at 637. Such claims can be resolved on either prong. Id . In addition, we will not hold counsel ineffective if the action the defendant claims counsel should have taken would have been meritless. Id

. In li ght of the supreme court’s ruling in State v. Shipley , 757 N.W.2d 228, 234, 238 (Iowa 2008) (concluding neither the hearsay rules nor the Confrontation Clause prevented the admission of a certified driving record), we conclude any appellate challenge to th e district court’s evidentiary ruling in this case would have been meritless. See also State v. Kennedy , 846 N.W.2d 517, 525 (Iowa 2014) (“[T]he certified abstract of [defendant’s] driving record . . . is not3

testimonial and the admission of these two pag es did not violate the Confrontation Clauses of the United States or Iowa Constitutions.”). Thus, counsel was not ineffective in advising Lienau to plead guilty.
AFFIRMED.
&£- SfD-Z-Jo/S -to ft& aou fr nw murk \,)Ob(\p\ \V (VoSV Va ffu/rUse. i^y -frfi&l Wiy?SQftfik "TV/, ffpson A^T>i/k, tattoo* is Vfoin^T\spjthe.cA W^ Vo&gMW-' 

### nM^Wfii/lKftW, brtvi VdU/h m<j-Gyvalj \WJr ^ faa /io^f/A^s^ ^tuio houJ AU(°k\xjou\(4 fhtes)- 

### Vo yu/fW>£ VW^a^jherouse Lro/?> /iol cL ^Jg£^c^_

RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS SbP OS 2015 AbelAcoste,Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 823 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 823

To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to require the Attorney General 
to acquire data about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based 
                               on gender.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2009

    Mrs. Maloney (for herself, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Waxman, Ms. Lee of 
 California, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Stark, and Mr. Cummings) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to require the Attorney General 
to acquire data about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based 
                               on gender.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hate Crime Statistics Improvement 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO HATE CRIME STATISTICS ACT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b)(1) of the first section of the Hate 
Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``sexual orientation,''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or gender,'' after ``ethnicity,''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies to 
data about crimes occurring on or after the first day of the first 
calendar year after the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PRINCE G. ROBERTS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2734

[ December 27, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Michael C. Heisey

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07000259CFAXMX

.

Prince Roberts, Orlando, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, L EVINE and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 780 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to promote 

the safe use of the Internet by students, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2009 

Mr. PUTNAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to promote the safe use of the Internet by 

students, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Internet Safe5 ty Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROMOTING THE SAFE USE OF THE INTERNET BY 

7 STUDENTS. 

8 (a) ENHANCING EDUCATION THROUGH TECH9 NOLOGY.—Section 2416(b) of the Elementary and SecVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:10 Jan 31, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H780.IH H780

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 780 IH

1 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6766(b)) is 

2 amended by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(11) Developing and implementing programs 

4 that promote the safe use of the Internet by stu5 dents, such as programs that— 

6 ‘‘(A) educate students about appropriate 

7 online behavior, including interacting with indi8 viduals on social networking Web sites and in 

9 chat rooms; 

10 ‘‘(B) protect students against online preda11 tors, cyberbullying, or unwanted exposure to in12 appropriate material; or 

13 ‘‘(C) promote involvement by parents in 

14 the use of the Internet by their children.’’. 

15 (b) SAFE AND DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMU16 NITIES.—Section 4115(b)(2)(E) of the Elementary and 

17 Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

18 7115(b)(2)(E)) is amended by adding at the end the fol19 lowing: 

20 ‘‘(xxiii) Developing and implementing 

21 programs that promote the safe use of the 

22 Internet by students, such as programs 

23 that— 

24 ‘‘(I) educate students about ap25 propriate online behavior, including 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 780 IH

1 interacting with individuals on social 

2 networking Web sites and in chat 

3 rooms; 

4 ‘‘(II) protect students against on5 line predators, cyberbullying, or un6 wanted exposure to inappropriate ma7 terial; or 

8 ‘‘(III) promote involvement by 

9 parents in the use of the Internet by 

10 their children.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I,Laura J. Neumann, Senior Director of Financial Reporting and Compliance ofArden Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Company), hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge (1) theannual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/LAURA J. NEUMANN |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Name:               | Laura  J. Neumann |
|   | Title:              | Senior  Director of Financial |
|   |                | Reporting  and Compliance |
|   | Date:               | March 7,  2008 |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
Exhibit
10.1


 


This
loan agreement (this “Agreement”) is made on October 3, 2019 by and between 2490585
Ontario Inc., an Ontario corporation (“Lender”), and Slinger Bag Inc., a Nevada corporation (together with
its affiliates, “Borrower”).


 


Whereas,
Borrower requires an infusion of U.S. $500,000 in cash (the “Loan”) in order to finance its operations and Lender
wishes to provide the Loan, in each case, subject to the terms and on the conditions of this Agreement;


 


Now,
therefore, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements of the Parties hereinafter set forth,
it is hereby agreed by and between the Parties hereto as follows:


 


1.
Loan. Lender hereby agrees to lend $500,000 in immediately available funds to the Borrower by wiring the same in accordance
with instructions to be provided by the Borrower separately. Borrower agrees to accept $500,000 as a loan to be repaid out of
available cash as soon as practicable in the reasonable opinion of both the Lender and the Borrower. The Loan shall bear interest
at a rate of one percent (1%) per month (i.e., 12% per annum) on the outstanding amount until repaid in full. Any payment of cash
to be made by Borrower to Lender shall be applied first to accrued, but unpaid, interest and second to the outstanding principal.


 


2.
Dividends or Distributions. The Parties agree that Borrower shall not be permitted to declare, make or pay any dividend
or distribution unless and until the Loan is repaid in full.


 


3.
Costs and Fees. Each Party will bear its own costs in connection with the entry into this Agreement and any payments to
be made or received hereunder.


 


4.
Amendments and Assignments. This Agreement may not be amended or assigned without the written consent of all Parties.


 


5.
Further Assurances. Each party hereto agrees to execute, on request, all other documents and instruments as the other party
shall reasonably request, and to take any actions, which are reasonably required or desirable to carry out obligations imposed
under, and affect the purposes of, this Agreement.


 


6.
Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by the substantive law of the State of New York, without
application of any conflict of laws principle that would require the application of the law of any other jurisdiction


 




    	 	 	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


	Slinger
    Bag Inc.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Mike
    Ballardie	 
	Chief
    Executive Officer	 
	 	 
	Agreed
    and accepted:	 
	 	 
	2490585
    Ontario Inc.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	[name]	 
	Authorized
    Signatory
# CE2010212EN.01016801.xml

| 5.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 212/168 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 212/168

---

Tuesday 5 May 2009Petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of motor vehicles ***I

P6_TA(2009)0341

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 May 2009 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Stage II petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of passenger cars at service stations (COM(2008)0812 – C6-0470/2008 – 2008/0229(COD))

2010/C 212 E/29

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0812),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0470/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0208/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

Tuesday 5 May 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0229

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 5 May 2009 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Stage II petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of motor vehicles at service stations

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/126/EC.)

---