alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH Document 3-2 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
### EMS at USFA

In 2022, there were 32 million incidents. At a minimum, 65% of them are emergency medical service-related responses.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of BRIAZZ, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Victor
D. Alhadeff, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


November 18, 2002                           /s/ Victor D. Alhadeff
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Victor D. Alhadeff
                                            Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                                            Financial Officer, Secretary and
                                            Chairman of the Board of Directors
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 26, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00292-CV MAXX SPORTS TECHNOL OGIES, LTD., Appellant V. SPORTS IN ACTION, LLC D/B/ A HIGH FIELD MARKETING, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 129th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-40112

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith The filing fee and appellant’s brief in this case are overdue . By postcard dated July 12, 2021, we notified appellant for the second time that the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so w ould result in dismissal of the appeal. By postcard dated June 16, 2021, we notified a ppellant the time for filing its brief had–2– expired. 1 We directed appellant to file a br ief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant th at failure to file its brie f by that time might result in the dismissal of this appeal without furthe r notice. To date, a ppellant has not paid the filing fee, filed a brief, filed an extension motion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

210292F.P05

1 The court reporter notified the Court there is no repo rter’s record for this case, and the clerk’s record does not show a hearing was conducted in this case. /C r ai g Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MAXX SPORTS TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Appellant
No. 05-21-00292-CV V. SPORTS IN ACTION, LLC D/B/A HIGH FIELD MARKETING, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 129th District Court, Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-40112. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered July 26, 2021
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**Clickable
      Enterprises, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Nicholas Cirillo, Jr., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





*Date:
                February 13, 2006*
              
              */s/
                Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.*
              *Nicholas
                Cirillo, Jr.*
              *President
                (Principal Executive Officer)*





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549





FORM 10-Q/A


Amendment No. 1





x           Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012


- or -


o           Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





For the transition period from   to





Commission File Number 0-22981





GEORGIA-CAROLINA BANCSHARES, INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Georgia

58-2326075(State or other Jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)Incorporation or Organization)




3527 Wheeler Road, Augusta, Georgia 30909


(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)





(706) 731-6600


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)




Not Applicable


(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


YES   x   NO   o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and has posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).


YES   x   NO   o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):




Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
oNon-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
x




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


YES  o   NO  x


Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.




Class

Outstanding at May 14, 2012Common Stock, $.001 Par Value

3,643,736 shares










EXPLANATORY NOTE




The purpose of this amendment is to simply indicate that we are not a shell company as indicated in error in our previously filed Form 10-Q.










SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




GEORGIA-CAROLINA BANCSHARES, INC.August 9, 2012
By:
/s/ Remer Y. Brinson, IIIRemer Y. Brinson, IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)August 9, 2012
By:
/s/ Thomas J. FlournoyThomas J. FlournoySenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting officer)
# L_2013161EN.01S00301.xml

| 13.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
#### Philip R. Stone, Appellant, v Eugene Lansing et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Dewitt, et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment which confirmed the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals. The determination granted a use variance to *1007permit use of a 6.1-acre parcel of vacant land located in a R-2 residential district as an office complex. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s findings that the land in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for the residential purpose permitted by the current zoning *(see, Matter of Village Bd. v Jarrold,*53 NY2d 254, 259-260), that the plight of the owner is due to the unique circumstance of the location of the parcel at the intersection of two primary roadways which precludes residential development *(see, Matter of Jayne Estates v Raynor,*22 NY2d 417, 425) and that the proposed use will not alter the essential character of the locality *(see, Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn, v Klein,*51 NY2d 963). Accordingly, since the determination of the responsible officials in the affected community has a rational basis, it is not arbitrary and is supported by the evidence, it must be affirmed *(see, Matter of Cowan v Kern,*41 NY2d 591, 598-599; *Matter of Otto v Steinhilber,*282 NY 71, 77-78; *Matter of Commeo, Inc. v Amelkin,*109 AD2d 794, *Iv denied*65 NY2d 606). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J. — art 78.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05339-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
**Installations and Environmental Menu**

                    - Installations and Environmental Home
                    - NEPA Projects
                    - At-Sea                        - At-Sea Training
                      - Sonar
                      - City at Sea
                      - Environmental Planning
                      - Protective Measures
                      - Marine Species Monitoring
                    - Ashore                        - Home Basing and Homeporting
                      - Field Carrier Landing Practice (FCLP) 
                      - Aircraft Noise Modeling
                      - Naval Range Complex
                    - Outreach                        - Stewards of the Sea
                    - Energy

**Environmental Planning**

----

The U.S. Navy conducts training and testing (military readiness) activities in many areas around the world. U.S. Fleet Forces Command, in coordination with other Navy commands, prepares environmental studies for the military readiness activities it conducts. For example, an analysis of military readiness activities conducted in the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico called the the Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing (AFTT) Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) was completed in 2018.The AFTT EIS/OEIS includes an analysis of potential environmental impacts from Navy military readiness activities. These activities include the use of ships, submarines, aircraft and weapons systems. The AFTT EIS/OEIS also analyzed the Navy’s use of sonar and explosives.  These studies are important because they allow the Navy to identify and consider the potential environmental effects its readiness activities may have on environmental resources while maintaining required levels of military readiness. Activities with potential to significantly impact environmental resources are evaluated for any protective (mitigation) measures that could be implemented to help minimize effects on those resources, including marine mammals, sea turtles, fishes, birds, and coral while maintaining required levels of military readiness training.  The analysis in these studies are also used to request authorizations and permits, and to conduct consultations that are required under the *Endangered Species Act *and the *Marine Mammal Protection Act *as well as other federal laws. 

 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of IMCO Recycling Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard L Kerr, Chief Executive Officer and President, and I, Paul V. Dufour, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |        |  |                                                                                   
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |        |  | /s/    Richard L. Kerr                                                            
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Richard L. Kerr                                                                   
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and President                                             
|                       |  |        |  | (principal executive officer)                                                     
|Date: October 21, 2004 |  |        |  |                                                                                   
|                       |  |       
|                       |  |        |  | /s/    Paul V. Dufour                                                             
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Paul V. Dufour                                                                    
|                       |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
|Date: October 21, 2004 |  |        |  |
Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors
JLG Industries, Inc.
McConnellsburg, PA 17233

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on on Form S-3, No. 333-110793, Form S-4, No. 333-99217 and No.
333-107468 and Form S-8, No. 33-60366, No. 33-61333, No. 33-75746, No.
333-71428, No. 333-71430, No. 333-71432 and No. 333-110798 of our report dated
September 12, 2003, except for Note 2 as to which the date is September 23, 2003
and Note 24 as to which date is March 11, 2004, relating to the amended audited
consolidated financial statements of JLG Industries, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended July 31, 2003.


                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 11, 2004
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1627. JAMES L. WRIGHT v. THE STATE.

In 2018, James L. Wright pled guilty to aggravated assault and other crimes. In

2024, he filed motions to vacate his convictions and sentence. On February 7, 2024,

the trial court entered an order denying and dismissing the motions. On March 22,

2024, Wright filed a notice of direct appeal to the Supreme Court.1 That Court

transferred the matter here upon finding no basis for jurisdiction there. See Case No.

S24A0881 (May 14, 2024). We also lack jurisdiction.

Pretermitting whether Wright had a right of direct appeal from the trial court’s

order, his notice of appeal was not timely filed.Anotice of appeal must be filedwithin

30 days after entry of the order on appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and

timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on

an appellate court. Redford v. State, 357 Ga. App. 247, 250 (850 SE2d 447) (2020).

Wright filed his notice of appeal 44 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal.

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

1Wright also filed an application for discretionary appeal in the Supreme Court,

which transferred that matter to us. We dismissed the application for lack of

jurisdiction. See Case No. A24D0326 (May 16, 2024).

July 03, 2024
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/03/2024
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 24, 2011 

t1017 

Order 

 

October 24, 2011 

143167 & (14) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143167 

 COA: 302218 

Berrien CC: 2009-000500-FH 

CHARLIE BERNARD MACON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 

GUELMER RENDON, 07-CV-04510 (AKH) 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

-againstNOTICE OF DEFENDANT VERIZON 

NEW YORK INC.’S ADOPTION OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

VERIZON NEW YORK INC., 

et al.

 

 

Defendants. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Verizon New York Inc. (“Verizon”) 

hereby adopts as its Answer in the instant case its Answer to Plaintiffs’ Master Complaint which 

was filed and served on October 16, 2007 in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower 

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). In accordance with Case Management 

Order No. 4, the allegations of the instant Check-Off Complaint are deemed to be denied. 

Verizon also incorporates by reference all averments and denials of its Answer to Plaintiffs’ 

Master Complaint as though same were more fully set forth herein at length. Verizon further 

adopts the responses contained in any Amended Answer filed and served herein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Verizon reserves the right to file and 

serve an amended answer and specifically reserves the right to interpose cross-claims and thirdparty claims. 

WHEREFORE, Verizon demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against Verizon, together with its cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 26 Filed 12/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Dated: November 26, 2007 /s/ Eric F. Leon 

Eric F. Leon 

Lee Ann Stevenson 

Andrew Dunlap 

Michael D. Reisman 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Citigroup Center 

153 East 53rd Street 

New York, New York 10022-4611 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Attorneys for Defendant Verizon New York Inc.

TO: Christopher LoPalo, Esq. 

WORBY GRONER EDELMAN & NAPOLI BERN, LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

 Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

ROBERT A. GROCHOW, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

 Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATA 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 Marc D. Weinblatt, Esq. 

SANDERS, SANDERS, BLOCK, WOYICK, VIENER & GROSSMAN, P.C. 

100 Herricks Road 

Mineola, New York 11501 

 David Kremen, Esq. 

OSHMAN & MIRISOLA, LLP 

42 Broadway, 10th Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

 

All Defense Counsel (via ECF)

Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 26 Filed 12/02/2007 Page 2 of 2