alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANY
 2006 OMNIBUS EQUITY PLAN
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD GRANT NOTICE
 Company Plan Participant Stock Shares Exhibit A Restricted Stock
Agreement Grant Notice
 Participant
 Grant Date
 Total Number of
Shares of Restricted Stock
 Vesting Schedule:
    
    Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, this
Grant Notice and the Restricted Stock Agreement, the
Companys Forfeiture Restriction (as defined in the
Restricted Stock Agreement) shall lapse as to 100% of
the Shares as of the Grant Date; provided, however, that
following Participants termination by the Company for
Cause, all Shares or any sales proceeds therefrom, as
the case may be, shall be subject to forfeiture and the
Company shall be authorized to enter into any
documentation it deems appropriate to evidence the
foregoing.
  {signature page follows on next page}




---



##### 



GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANY:
    
    PARTICIPANT:By:
    
    
    By:Print Name:
    
    Thomas P. DArcy
    
    
    Print Name:Title:
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerAddress:
    
    1551 North Tustin Ave., Suite 300
    
    
    Address:Santa Ana, California 92705Attachments:
    
    Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Exhibit A)
2006 Omnibus Equity Plan (Exhibit B)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 20.2

        ANNUAL CERTIFICATEHOLDERS REPORT
        MELLON BANK PREMIUM FINANCE LOAN MASTER TRUST SERIES 2002-1
        ANNUAL PERIOD ENDING
        DECEMBER 31, 2002

ANNUAL HOLDER'S DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY

Pursuant to Section 5.2, Servicer does hereby declare to the Trustee the
following distributions for the calendar year 2002 as set forth below:

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                     <C>
Interest Payments

A.      Pursuant to subsection 4.11(g);

        1.      Amount distributed to the Class A Holders               540,944.25

        2.      Amount distributed to the Class B Holders                39,839.56

        3.      Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder     81,738.76

Principal Payments

B.      Pursuant to subsection 4.11(h)(i);

        1.      Amount distributed to the Class A Holders                    $0.00

        2.      Amount distributed to the Class B Holders                    $0.00

        3.      Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder         $0.00
</TABLE>


                         AFCO CREDIT CORPORATION, as Servicer


                        By   /s/ C. Leonard O'Connell
                         Name:  C. Leonard O'Connell
Dated March 21, 2003     Title: Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4644-N-18]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 4, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*      ( print page 22592)                        No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: April 26, 2001.

John D. Garrity,

Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 01-11025  Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 9 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 9 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
# CE2010265EN.01003501.xml

| 30.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 265/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 265/35

---

Tuesday 20 October 2009Reduced rates of excise duty in Madeira and the Azores *

P7_TA(2009)0033

European Parliament legislative resolution of 20 October 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Portugal to apply reduced rates of excise duty in the autonomous region of Madeira on locally produced and consumed rum and liqueurs and in the autonomous region of the Azores on locally produced and consumed liqueurs and eaux-de-vie (COM(2009)0259 – C7-0104/2009 – 2009/0075(CNS))

2010/C 265 E/12

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2009)0259),

having regard to Article 299(2), of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0104/2009),

having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A7-0039/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors
JLG Industries, Inc.
McConnellsburg, PA 17233

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8, No. 33-60366, No. 33-61333; and No. 33-75746 of our report dated
September 10, 2001, except for the note entitled "Bank Credit Lines and
Long-term Debt" as to which the date is October 8, 2001, relating to the audited
consolidated financial statements of JLG Industries, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July 31, 2001.


                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
October 8, 2001
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 41 Filed 08/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,021
<SECURITIES>                                         7
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,624
<INVENTORY>                                     82,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,994
<PP&E>                                         276,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 399,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,714
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   399,465
<SALES>                                        335,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               335,138
<CGS>                                          297,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (522)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,049)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05308-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT OCTOBER 31, 1999
(UNAUDITED) AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         728,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,232,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 26,927,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,907,000
<PP&E>                                      72,871,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              35,911,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              86,188,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,016,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,330,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,188,000
<SALES>                                    109,665,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           109,665,000
<CGS>                                       33,700,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,429,000<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             299,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,237,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   299,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,938,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,938,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<FN>
<F1>PROVISION FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND INVENTORY PROVISION INCLUDED IN TOTAL
COSTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
HYNES & HOWES INSURANCE COUNSELORS, INC.
                         Notes to Fianancial Statements
                           September 30, 1996 and 1995



Note 4.  Other Current Assets:

     Other Current Assets consisted of the following:
                                                        9/30/96         9/30/95
     Contract Receivable, Sale of Tanglefoot
         Apartments - Current (B)                      $ 11,800        $ 10,725
     Real Estate Contracts Receivable -
         Current (C)                                      1,500           1,445
     Real Estate Tax Certificates                         2,955           2,883

              Total                                    $ 16,255        $ 15,053


(A) Sale of Insurance Agencies:

      During the year ended September 30, 1980, two (2) insurance agencies owned
      by the Company were sold on Contract to R.A.P. Enterprises, Inc. (See Note
      3).  Two (2) contracts were received for the sale.  The contracts were for
      thirty (30) years b earing interest at the rate of 10% per annum
      commencing on September 1, 1980, with regular monthly payments.

      One (1) contract was in the amount of $76,000 with monthly payments of
      $1,229.  The other contract was in the amount of $87,000 with monthly
      payments of $945.

      During the year ended September 30, 1995, these contracts were paid off
      and a discount of $1,371 was allowed for early payoff.

      R.A.P. Enterprises was owned by Ralph A. Parry, former President of Hynes
      & Howes Insurance Counselors, Inc.

      The remaining insurance agency (Davenport Agency) owned by the Company was
      sold as of January 1, 1981, to Ralph Parry Insurance Agency, Ltd.  A
      contract in the amount of $238,286 was received for the sale which
      included advances to officers.  The con tract was for thirty (30) years
      bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum commencing on February 1,
      1981, with regular monthly payments.  The monthly payment was to be
      $2,090.  Ralph Parry Insurance Agency, Ltd. is also owned by Ralph A.
      Parry.

      This contract was also paid off during the year ended September 30, 1995.
      A discount of $18,806 was allowed for early payoff.

      The proceeds from these contracts were used to purchase real estate
      contracts receivable (see Note 4C) and to pay commissions payable (see
      Note 8).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1825

ALBA ELSY CHACON-SORTO, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (A98-122-648) Submitted: June 18, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Goren, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GOREN, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Angela N. Liang, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alba Elsy Chacon-Sorto, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision and find that substantial evidence supports the ruling that Chacon-Sorto failed to establish a nexus between any alleged persecution and a protected ground as necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2006) (stating that burden of proof is on alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). Moreover, as Chacon-Sorto cannot sustain her burden on the asylum claim, she cannot establish her entitlement to withholding of removal. See Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004) (“Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum—even though the facts that must be proved are the same—an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).”). We also find that Chacon-Sorto fails to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than- 3 - not that he or he would be tortured if removed to the proposedcountry of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2004). ChaconSorto fails to make this requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     March 9, 2007/s/ Neil ChristiansenNeil ChristiansenChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Laura J. Neumann, Senior Director of Financial Reporting and Compliance ofArden Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Company), hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge (1) the annualreport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|        | /s/LAURA J.  NEUMANN |                                                   |
|--------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                | Laura J. Neumann                                       |
|   | Title:               | Senior Director of Financial Reporting and  Compliance |
|   | Date:                | March 13, 2007                                         |
|        |                      |                                                        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6480

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BILLY CAMPBELL HARDING, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:02-cr-00381-WDQ-3; 1:05-cv-02735-WDQ) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 27, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy Campbell Harding, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Billy Campbell Harding seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Harding has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED