alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Michigan Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 1 p.m. on Thursday, May 17, 2001, at the Holiday Inn Fairlane-Dearborn, 5801 Southfield Service Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48228. The purpose of the meeting is to hold a press conference to release the Committee's report, Civil Rights Issues Facing Arab Americans in Michigan. Also, the Committee will discuss current events and plan future activities.

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Constance M. Davis, Director of the Midwestern Regional Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Dated at Washington, DC, May 1, 2001.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-11370 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

                  SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE
               COOPERATIVE'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTORS


Compensation Arrangement for the Cooperative's Named Executive Officer

Following is a description of the compensation arrangement for Stephen R.
Wright, the Cooperative's Named Executive Officer:

<TABLE>
<S>                           <C>
      Stephen R. Wright       $185,000 annual base salary beginning August 19, 2006,
                              pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement with
                              the Cooperative
</TABLE>

Compensation Arrangements for Directors

Directors of the Cooperative are paid an annual retainer. Each director who is a
member-grower receives an annual retainer of $8,000, except Mr. Call, who also
serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Cooperative, receives an
annual retainer of $12,000. Each non-member grower director, namely Mr.
Harrington Jr., Mr. Lipinski and Mr. Stotz receive a retainer at an annual rate
of $20,000.
#                                                                         HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer                                                                    

##### by LT Rosalyn Lopez, Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron Four Zero

08 August 2022MAYPORT, Fl.  -- 

                220804-N-N0783-1006 MAYPORT, Fl. -- Cmdr. Justin Banz and Cmdr. David Bizzarri cut a cake during a change of command ceremony for the “Airwolves” of Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 40 onboard Naval Station Mayport on Aug. 04.  Cmdr. David Bizzarri assumed all duties and responsibilities as the commanding officer of HSM-40 in a ceremony attended by family and HSM-40 crew. (Photo courtesy U.S. Navy)            

                HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: COMNAVAIRLANT

VIRIN: 220804-N-N0783-1006

            SLIDESHOW | 6 images | HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer                    220804-N-N0783-1007 MAYPORT, Fl. -- Cmdr. Justin Banz walks through sideboys during a change of command ceremony for the “Airwolves” of Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 40 onboard Naval Station Mayport on Aug. 04.  Cmdr. David Bizzarri assumed all duties and responsibilities as the commanding officer of HSM-40 in a ceremony attended by family and HSM-40 crew. (Photo courtesy U.S. Navy)        

                    HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer                                            1 of 6                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer                                            2 of 6                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer                                            3 of 6                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer                                            4 of 6                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer                                            5 of 6                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

                    HSM-40 Welcomes Commanding Officer                                            6 of 6                    
                        Download Image                                            Image Details                    

Tags:
**Change of Command**HSM-40**AIRLANT**HSM Wing Atlantic
Clear All

        21 February 2023    

                    US 2nd Fleet, USFF host Fleet Medicine Symposium                  
                Commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet’s Health Service Support team, in conjunction with U.S. Fleet Forces Surgeon and Commander, Naval Medical Forces Atlantic (NMFL), hosted the Fleet Medicine Symposium, at Naval Support Activity Hampton Roads, Feb. 1-3, 2023.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6555 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6555

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
             Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2010

    Mr. King of Iowa (for himself and Mrs. Bachmann) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, Ways and 
  Means, Education and Labor, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, House 
 Administration, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
             Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND 
              THE HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2010.

    (a) Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.--Effective as of 
the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 
Law 111-148), such Act is repealed, and the provisions of law amended 
or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not 
been enacted.
    (b) Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.--
Effective as of the enactment of the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), such Act is repealed, 
and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored 
or revived as if such Act had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Scott C. Harvard, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shore Financial Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:May 13, 2005
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ImageEntertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Theodore S. Green, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                Based on myknowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

 

(2)                                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | June 29, 2010 | /s/ THEODORE S. GREEN                             |
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |               | Theodore S. Green                                 |
|   |               | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |

 

----
# C_2009084EN.01001001.xml

| 8.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/10

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

2009/C 84/08

The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block F12 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block F12 of the Dutch continental shelf.

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| The Minister for Economic Affairs, |
| --- |
| For the attention of J.C. De Groot, Director for the Energy Market |
| ALP/562 |
| Postbus 20101 |
| 2500 EJ Den Haag |
| NETHERLANDS |

The Minister for Economic Affairs,

For the attention of J.C. De Groot, Director for the Energy Market

ALP/562

Postbus 20101

2500 EJ Den Haag

NETHERLANDS

Applications received after this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by telephoning Mr P.C. de Regt: +31 70 379 7382.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-545-000]


Duke Energy Lee, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

January 9, 2001.
    Duke Energy Lee, LLC (Duke Lee) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Duke Lee will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions at market-based rates. Duke Lee also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Duke Lee 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Duke Lee.
    On January 5, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Duke Lee should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Duke Lee is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Duke Lee's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is February 5, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http:www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1134 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH     Document 18      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 3 of 3
#### Rovinzon CIFUENTES-VASQUEZ, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-60693

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 6, 2013.

Rovinzon Cifuentes-Vasquez, Clarks-ville, IN, pro se.

Juria L. Jones, Tangerlia Cox, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rovinzon Cifuentes-Vasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denying his motion for reconsideration of its order dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. He contends his motion to reopen should have been granted because: service of the Notice To Appear was legally insufficient; and there is no due-diligence requirement for pursuing reopening.

The BIA’s denying a motion for reconsideration is reviewed “under a highly deferential abuse-of-discretion standard”. *Singh v. Gonzales,*436 F.3d 484, 487 (5th Cir.2006) (quotation marks omitted). “A motion for reconsideration urges an adjudicative body to re-evaluate the record evidence only.” *Zhao v. Gonzales,*404 F.3d 295, 301 (5th Cir.2005). To succeed on such a motion, petitioner must “identify a change in the law, a misapplication of the law, or an aspect of the case that the BIA overlooked”. *Id.*

Cifuentes’ contentions primarily concern the denial of his motion to reopen, not the denial of his motion for reconsideration. He did not file a separate petition for review of the BIA’s dismissing his appeal of the denial of the motion to reopen. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the issues raised in Cifuentes’ brief regarding the motion to reopen. *See Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 400-01, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995) (period for seeking review of final removal order unaffected by petitioner’s later moving for reconsideration); *Guevara v. Gonzales,*450 F.3d 173, 176 (5th Cir.2006) (“BIA’s denial of an appeal and its denial of a motion to reconsider are two separate final orders, each of which require their own petitions for review” (quotation marks omitted)).

Because he fails to identify any change in the law, or any error of law or fact justifying reconsideration, Cifuentes’ contentions regarding reconsideration fail. *See Zhao,*404 F.3d at 301. Therefore, his petition for review of the BIA’s denying his motion for reconsideration is denied in part.

To the extent Cifuentes challenges the BIA’s refusal to reopen the proceedings *sua sponte*(and the attendant refusal to *255reconsider the same), our court lacks jurisdiction to consider his contention. *See Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 246, 249-50 (5th Cir.2004) (“a reviewing court has no legal standard against which to judge an IJ’s decision not to invoke its *sua sponte*authority”).

DISMISSED IN PART; and DENIED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.