alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,561,957
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,500,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,710,087
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,118,548
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,117,713
<LOANS>                                     48,463,383
<ALLOWANCE>                                    630,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,052,992
<DEPOSITS>                                  53,688,056
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,115,872
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,975,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,273,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              75,052,992
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,041,016
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              273,112
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               106,277
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,420,405
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             630,053
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             630,053
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          790,352
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                355,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                471,297
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     318,297
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   318,297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.80 
<LOANS-NON>                                          0 
<LOANS-PAST>                                   443,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               627,669
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,804
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              630,865
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           630,865
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
                  

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 19 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Image Entertainment, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Martin W. Greenwald, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 

(1)                                  Based on myknowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | June 29, 2004                   | /s/ MARTIN W. GREENWALD |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Martin W. Greenwald                  |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Applica Incorporated.
 Dated: March 14, 2006
    By:
    /s/  Terry L. PolistinaTerry L. Polistina
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATE
      OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**OF
      ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (REGISTRANT)**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Anthony Principe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:




(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, which this
      statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      the
      Registrant.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
      63
      title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q
      or
      as a separate disclosure document.


Date:
                      August 14, 2007
                  /s/
                      Anthony PrincipeAnthony
                      PrincipeSenior
                        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                      Executive Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-05364-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05364-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05364-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
IB 

Union Calendar No. 95 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 762 

[Report No. 111–178] 

To validate final patent number 27–2005–0081, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2009 

Mr. HELLER (for himself, Ms. BERKLEY, and Ms. TITUS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JUNE 23, 2009 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To validate final patent number 27–2005–0081, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 762 RH

1 SECTION 1. FINAL PATENT AND LAND RECONFIGURATION 

2 IN CLARK COUNTY AND LINCOLN COUNTY, 

3 NEVADA. 

4 Patent No. 27–2005–0081 and its associated land re5 configuration issued by the Bureau of Land Management 

6 on February 18, 2005, is hereby affirmed and validated 

7 as having been issued pursuant to and in compliance with 

8 the provisions of the Nevada-Florida Land Exchange Au9 thorization Act of 1988 (Public Law 100–275), the Na10 tional Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and the Federal 

11 Land Policy Management Act of 1976 for the benefit of 

12 the desert tortoise and other species and their habitat to 

13 increase the likelihood of their recovery. The process uti14 lized by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and 

15 the Bureau of Land Management in reconfiguring the 

16 lands as shown on Exhibit 1–4 of the Final Environmental 

17 Impact Statement for the Planned Development Project 

18 MSHCP, Lincoln County, NV (FWS–R8–ES–2008– 

19 N0136) and the reconfiguration provided for in Special 

20 Condition 10 of Army Corps of Engineers Permit No. 

21 200125042 are hereby ratified. 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS

tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 95 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 762 

[Report No. 111–178] 

A BILL 

To validate final patent number 27–2005–0081, 

and for other purposes. 

JUNE 23, 2009 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. '1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Briazz, Inc.(the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tracy L. Warner,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



                                                      /s/ Tracy L. Warner
                                                      ----------------------
                                                      Tracy L. Warner
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      August 13, 2002
**PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL**December 6, 2001Ivan D. Trifunovich, Ph.D., MBADear Ivan:I am very excited to be able to offer you the position of Senior Vice President and General Managerfor the Genomics Business Unit at Third Wave Technologies, Inc., reporting to the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company. We feel that, given your experience, you are in a strong position toassist Third Wave in developing into a major enterprise. We are most eager to have you join ourdynamic team.The particulars of the offer are as follows:**Base Pay**. Your semi-monthly starting base salary will be $10,208.34; the equivalent to$245,000 per year. You will receive performance reviews, and will be eligible for increases inyour base salary, at least annually.**Bonus**. You will also be eligible for an annual performance bonus targeted at thirty fivepercent (35%) of your base salary ($85,750). The actual amount will be based on company andpersonal performance, and is subject to the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer and theapproval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.**Stock Options**. As a key member of the Third Wave team, you will be entitled to participatein the Company’s Incentive Stock Option Plan which is administered by the Company’s Board ofDirectors. You will initially receive an option to purchase two hundred ten thousand (210,000)shares of Third Wave Technologies, Inc. common stock (Nasdaq Symbol — TWTI) at the fair marketvalue as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. The specific terms of your option will bedescribed in the appropriate Stock Option Agreement and in the Plan document. These options willvest in equal 25% installments over 4 years beginning on the first anniversary of your employment.Based on your performance and ability to increase the value of the Company, the CompensationCommittee of the Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of additional stock options. ThirdWave’s philosophy is to provide the incentive to its key team members to create the highest mutualvalue. As an Officer in the Company, you are eligible for accelerated vesting upon change ofcontrol as follows: a) fifty percent of your unvested options would vest upon change of control andb) the remaining unvested options would vest as the earlier of 6 months thereafter or upontermination after change of control.
 

 
December 6, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         836,400
<SECURITIES>                                    50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    715,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,713,000
<PP&E>                                         906,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               (830,600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,916,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          369,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,539,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,916,900
<SALES>                                        982,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,063,900
<CGS>                                          650,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,666,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,548,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,548,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,548,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        




</TABLE>
JUAN OSCAR DOMINGUEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3133

Opinion filed September 8, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Juan Oscar Dominguez, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated 

appeal from the February 1, 2016, judgment and sentence in Duval County Circuit 

Court case number 16-2013-CF-008838-AXXX-MA. Upon issuance of mandate in 
2

this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for 

treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). If petitioner 

qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent 

petitioner on appeal.

MAKAR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Philip Edwards, Appellant, v Ben Franklin Development Corp., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about May 11, 1989, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without dis*812bursements. The stay granted by order of this court entered on May 23, 1989 is vacated. Concur—Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-056]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that OptoGel, Inc., of Ashlawn, 
Pennsylvania, has applied for an exclusive license to practice the 
invention disclosed in NASA Case No. GSC-13, 13-1 entitled ``Sol-Gel 
Processing to Form Sol-Gel Monoliths Inside Hollow Core Optical Fiber 
and Sol-Gel Fiber Devices Made Thereby,'' for which a U.S. Patent 
Application was filed and assigned to the United States of America as 
represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration. Publication of this notice is not a determination by 
NASA that the requested license will be granted, and NASA, in the 
absence of any objections or after reviewing any objections to this 
notice, may decide to grant the license as requested, grant co-
exclusive or partially exclusive licenses, grant a nonexclusive 
license, or not grant any license at all. Written objections to the 
prospective grant of a license should be sent to Goddard Space Flight 
Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by July 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Cox, Goddard Space Flight 
Center, Office of the Patent Counsel, Mail Code 710.1, Greenbelt, MD 
20771, telephone (301) 286-7351.

    Dated: April 27, 2001.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-11065 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998

<CASH>                                     5,859,549 
<SECURITIES>                                    0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                327,004 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0    
<INVENTORY>                                     0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6,186,553 
<PP&E>                                    25,944,030 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            32,600,089 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,903,599 
<BONDS>                                   23,219,926 
<COMMON>                                        0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0    
<PREFERRED>                                     0    
<OTHER-SE>                                (8,240,114)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              32,600,089 
<SALES>                                   11,046,128 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          11,306,958 
<CGS>                                           0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4,961,945 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             207,094 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,686,420 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            3,451,499 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        2,615,329 
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0    
<CHANGES>                                       0    
<NET-INCOME>                               2,615,329 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  65.88 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  65.88 

        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Brown, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered September 20, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress a statement made by him.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*We reject*the defendant’s contention that the hearing court’s failure to suppress his statement made to the complaining witness in the presence of a police officer was improper. The record establishes that the defendant volunteered *465the statement without interrogation, and there is no indication that the defendant was threatened or coerced. Moreover, great weight must be accorded the determination of the hearing court, with its particular advantages of having seen and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761), and its determination should not be disturbed as it is supported by the record *(see, People v Gee,*104 AD2d 561).

Similarly, we reject the defendant’s contention that he was prejudiced when he complied with a request by the trial court, made on behalf of the prosecutor, that he stand before the jury in order for it to determine whether or not he was cross-eyed. The complaining witness had previously testified that one of the perpetrators possessed this characteristic.

We have reviewed the defendant’s other contentions and find that they are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
#### Suren HOVANESYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71078.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2011.*

Filed April 26, 2011.

Artem M. Sarian, Esquire, Sarian Law Group, APLC, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.

Andrea Gevas, Lisa Marie Arnold, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*786Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Suren Hovanesyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Singh v. Gonzales,*491 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir. 2007), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency acted within its discretion in denying as untimely Hovanesyan’s motion to reopen because it was filed more than three yeai's after the final removal order, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1), and Hovanesyan did not show that he acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling of the filing deadline, *see Singh,*491 F.3d at 1096-97.

Hovanesyan’s request for oral argument is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0605 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CLAY BRADY RIPPLE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 28, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 21 2021

12/21/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0605