alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 September 1, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-10148

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-14049-CR-KAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

SAMUEL LEE MIDDLETON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(September 1, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Leon Daniel Watts, counsel for Samuel Lee Middleton, has filed a motion to
2

withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Middleton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
#                                                                         USS Arleigh Burke Ports in Limassol, Cyprus                                                                    

##### by Ensign Susanna Gaither

30 January 2024
                240112-N-HT995-1522 MEDITERRANEAN SEA (Jan 12, 2023) The guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) transits through the Mediterranean Sea, Jan 12, 2023. Arleigh Burke is on a scheduled patrol in the U.S. Naval Forces Europe area of operations, employed by U.S. Sixth Fleet to defend U.S., allied, and partner interests. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Omar Rubi)                            USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) in Cypress                            240112-N-HT995-1522 MEDITERRANEAN SEA (Jan 12, 2023) The guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) transits through the Mediterranean Sea, Jan 12, 2023. Arleigh Burke is on a scheduled patrol in the U.S. Naval Forces Europe area of operations, employed by U.S. Sixth Fleet to defend U.S., allied, and partner interests. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Omar Rubi)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Omar RubiVIRIN: 240125-N-HT995-4667LIMASSOL, Cyprus - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) arrived in Limassol, Cyprus for a regularly scheduled port visit 25 Jan., 2024.

“It’s been great to return to Cyprus; our crew established a fantastic relationship with the Cypriot Navy during our visit in May 2023.”,said Cmdr Tyrchra Bowman, commanding officer of USS Arleigh Burke. “We look forward to building on the relationship this time while our Sailors enjoy some well-earned liberty in this beautiful country.”

The visit to Limassol enables the opportunity to strengthen the U.S. partnership with its NATO ally Cyprus and a shared commitment to a stable and secure Europe.

 

Arleigh Burke began its fourth forward deployed Naval Forces-Europe patrol Nov. 6th, 2023. Throughout the second half of the patrol the ship has operated in the Mediterranean with the Bataan Amphibious Readiness Group (ARG).

 

The Bataan ARG consists of the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5), the San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock USS Mesa Verde (LPD 19), and the Harpers Ferry-class dock landing ship USS Carter Hall (LSD 50). Embarked commands include the Marines of 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) and Amphibious Squadron (PHIBRON) 8.

 

For over 80 years, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has forged strategic relationships with allies and partners, leveraging a foundation of shared values to preserve security and stability. 

Headquartered in Naples, Italy, NAVEUR-NAVAF operates U.S. naval forces in the U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) and U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) areas of responsibility. U.S. Sixth Fleet is permanently assigned to NAVEUR-NAVAF, and employs maritime forces through the full spectrum of joint and naval operations.
# New Information on Potential Carcinogens in Firefighter Gear

**Posted: May 11, 2023**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Hazmat
            - Health and safety

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released a report on the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in firefighter turnout gear. PFAS are a category of manufactured chemicals linked to cancer and other diseases. They are a growing concern to firefighters who already face increased cancer risk from fire-related exposures such as smoke and soot, as well as vehicle exhaust and other hazardous materials.

The report provides an in-depth examination of a range of textiles used in turnout gear coats and pants, which are constructed in 3 layers: an outer shell, a moisture barrier and a thermal barrier. The research showed that the amount of PFAS present varies widely between manufacturers and layers, with the highest PFAS concentrations observed in the outermost 2 layers. **The results of the study suggest that selecting optimal combinations of fabrics for each layer could significantly reduce the amount of PFAS present in turnout gear.**

The study detailed in this report is one of many ongoing research projects designed to inform the updating of turnout equipment standards to better protect firefighters.

## Why are there PFAS in turnout gear?

The properties of PFAS can impart water and oil resistance to fabrics so they are often used to help firefighter gear meet the safety standards of the National Fire Protection Association Standard on Protective Ensembles for Structural Fire Fighting and Proximity Fire Fighting (NFPA 1971) criteria for resistance to heat, water and other hazards.

This article is based on content in theMay 11, 2023 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel—Mentored Research Career Development Awards (K23, K25, and K08) and Midcareer Awards in Patient-Oriented Research (K24).                    

*Date:*                         May 31-June 1, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         7 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Mariott Wardman Park Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road N.W., Washington, DC 20008.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Diane M. Reid, MD, Review Branch, Room 7182, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 26, 2001.

Anna P. Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-11188  Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32(2)

             Written Statement of the Acting Chief Financial Officer
                            of CNA Surety Corporation
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
          (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

         - The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
         June 30, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: August 2, 2005

/s/ John F. Corcoran
------------------------------------------
John F. Corcoran
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

                                       40
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Minerly, Senior Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ James C. MinerlyJames C. Minerly Senior Financial Officer November 15, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent, Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE> 1

                                   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES




<PAGE> 2

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21
                                                                     ----------



                         GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.


                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                             --------------------


Graybar Foreign Sales Corporation, a Barbados corporation.

Graybar International, Inc., a Missouri corporation doing
    business in the territory of Puerto Rico.

Graybar Financial Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Graybar Electric de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation.

Graybar Electric Limited, a Canadian corporation.

Graybar Foundation, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Graybar Services, Inc., an Illinois corporation.

Cognitive Training Corporation, a Missouri corporation.

Distribution Associates, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Graybar Electric (Ontario) Limited, a Canadian corporation

Graybar Holdings Limited, a Canadian corporation.

Graybar-P&M International PTE LTD, a Singapore corporation.
Exhibit 21.1
 OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, Inc.
 SUBSIDIARY
    
    STATE/COUNTRYCapstar Holding, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareCrown Camp Services Ltd.
    
    Alberta, CanadaGeneral Marine Leasing, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareOil States Energy Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareOil States Industries, Inc.
    
    DelawareOil States Industries (Asia) Pte Ltd
    
    SingaporeOil States Industries (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomOil States Skagit SMATCO L.L.C.
    
    DelawarePTI Group, Inc.
    
    Alberta, CanadaPTI Premium Camp Services Ltd.
    
    Alberta, CanadaSooner, Inc.
    
    DelawareSooner Pipe, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareStinger Wellhead Protection, Incorporated
    
    TexasStinger Wellhead Protection (Canada) Incorporated
    
    Alberta, CanadaA-Z Terminal Corporation
    
    OklahomaSpecialty Rental Tools & Supply, L.L.C.
    
    DelawarePTI Travco Modular Structures Ltd.
    
    Alberta, CanadaPTI Noble Structures, Inc.
    
    Alberta, CanadaWell Testing, Inc.
    
    Delaware
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DELANEY E. SMITH, Jr., M.D., an 

individual, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

STEPHANIE SMITH, an individual; 

BALDWIN HILLS MEDICAL GROUP 

CORPORATION, a California Medical 

Corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION 

AUTHORITY; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

No. 16-56176 

D.C. No. 2:00-cv-05986-RGKCWX 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017**

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

FILED

JUN 1 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-56176 

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, 

Circuit Judges.

Delaney E. Smith, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying 

his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Casey v. Albertson’s Inc., 

362 F.3d 1254, 1257 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Smith’s Rule 60(b) 

motion because Smith filed his motion nearly ten years after this action was closed

and Smith failed to establish any basis for relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1) (a 

motion to vacate an order under Rule 60(b) must be brought “within a reasonable

time”); Lemoge v. United States, 587 F.3d 1188, 1196 (9th Cir. 2009) (“What 

constitutes ‘reasonable time’ depends upon the facts of each case, taking into 

consideration the interest in finality, the reason for delay, the practical ability of the 

litigant to learn earlier of the grounds relied upon, and prejudice to the other 

parties.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Casey, 362 F.3d at 1260

(requirements for obtaining relief under Rule 60(b)(3)); United States v. Berke, 170 

F.3d 882, 883 (9th Cir. 1999) (requirements for obtaining relief under Rule 

60(b)(4)).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 
 3 16-56176 

in the opening brief, or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett 

v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford K. Bown,
certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended on March 31, 2009, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|/s/ Clifford K. Bown                                                             
|Clifford K. Bown Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May 8, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP00-495-000 and RP01-97-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Change in Technical 
Conference

April 24, 2001.
    The technical conference in the above-captioned dockets which was 
previously scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. on May 24, 2001, by notice 
issued April 19, 2001, will instead begin at 10 a.m. on the same day, 
in order to accommodate the travel arrangements of theparties.

David P. Boergers
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10589 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##  

**BMC**
| **BMC Industries, Inc.**One Meridian Crossings, Suite 850  Minneapolis, MN 55423  Web site   www.bmcind.com |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

**NEWS RELEASE**

 

 
| CONTACT: | CURTIS E. PETERSEN | (NYSE: BMM)           |
|----------|--------------------|-----------------------|
|     | (952) 851-6030     | FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |

 

# **BMC Industries Completes Sale of Vision-Ease's Optifacts Division**

January 28, 2002 -- BMCIndustries, Inc. announced it has completed the sale of Vision-Ease's Optifactsdivision to Essilor of America, Inc. of Dallas, Texas.  The Optifacts division of Vision-Ease Lens,Inc. is a leading software vendor in the optical industry and provides labmanagement software to a number of retail and wholesale optical laboratories.

BMC did not disclose detailsof the transaction, but said it will use the proceeds from the sale to reducedebt.

BMCIndustries, founded in 1907, is comprised of two business segments:Buckbee-Mears and Optical Products.

The Buckbee-Mears group, through its Mask Operations, is the onlyindependent North American manufacturer of aperture masks.  The Buckbee-Mears group, through itsMicro-Technology Operations, is also a leadingproducer of a variety of precision photo-etched and electroformed componentsthat require fine features and tight tolerances.

TheOptical Products group, operating under the Vision-Ease trade name, is a leadingdesigner, manufacturer and distributor of polycarbonate, glass and plasticeyewear lenses.  Vision-Ease is atechnology and market share leader in the polycarbonate lens segment of themarket.  Polycarbonate lenses arethinner and lighter than lenses made of other materials, while providinginherent ultraviolet (UV) filtering and impact resistant characteristics.

BMC Industries, Inc. is traded on the New York StockExchange under the ticker symbol "BMM".  For more information about BMC Industries, Inc., visit theCompany's Web site at www.bmcind.com

 

-30-
#### Surinder KAUR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-71823.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 24, 2013.

Christopher John Stender, Esquire, Federal Immigration Counselors, Inc., APC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Theo Nickerson, Esquire, Oil, Matthew Allan Spurlock, Ada Elsie Bosque, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Surinder Kaur, native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Toufighi v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Kaur’s untimely motion to reopen where the motion was filed over four years after the BIA’s final decision, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Kaur failed to establish changed circumstances in India material to her claim to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(h); *Toufighi,*538 F.3d at 996-97 (underlying adverse credibility determination rendered evidence of changed circumstances immaterial).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### BRADY, Plaintiff, v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA, Defendant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

August 1, 1894.)

Action by John Brady, as administrator, against the Prudential Insurance Company of America. James A. Donegan, for plaintiff. Wm. .0. Campbell, for defendant.

No opinion. Motion for reargument and for lehve to go to the court of appeals denied, with costs. See 29 N. Y. Supp. 44.