alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,300,568
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         400,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 20,713,011
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,979,797
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,980,463
<LOANS>                                     50,270,097
<ALLOWANCE>                                    636,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,441,973
<DEPOSITS>                                  53,347,107
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            970,749
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,975,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,148,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              74,441,973
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,110,474
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              611,164
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               134,564
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,856,202
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,263,540
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,263,540
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,592,662
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   12,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                683,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                983,150
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     613,285
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   613,285
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.36 
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,000 
<LOANS-PAST>                                   426,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               627,669
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,275
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              636,394
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           636,394
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
                  

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRANDON ELIAS PEREZ

- CARDONA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 72094

Agency No. A208

- 980

- 094

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 1 , 2023 * *

San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BADE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Brandon Elias Perez

- Cardona, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding

the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Tortur e (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 1 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

1. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Petitioner

failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm he experienced or fears in

Guatemala and a protect ed ground . Although Petitioner provided evidence that he

was beat up by gang members on two occasions, he offered no evidence that those

attacks were related to a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007,

1016 (9th Cir. 2010) ( holding that a n applicant’s “desire to be free from

. . .

random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”)

. We

therefore deny the petition as to the asylum and withholding claims. See Garcia v.

Wilkinson , 988 F.3d 1136, 1143 (9th Cir. 2021) ( recognizing that an applicant for

asylum “must demonstrate a nexus between her past or feared harm and a protected

ground”); Vasquez

- Rodriguez v. Garland , 7 F.4th 888, 892 (9th Cir. 2021) (“To

qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must show that ‘ it is more likely

than not that ’ he would be persecuted because of a protected ground.” (quoting INS

v. Stevic , 467 U.S. 407, 424 (1984) ).

2

. Regarding Petitioner’s application for relief under the CAT, substantial

evidence also supports the IJ’s conclusion, adopted by the BIA, that Petitioner

failed to show that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by or with

the acquiescence of a public official if returned to Guatemala. See Xochihua

Jaimes v. Barr , 962 F.3d 1175, 1183 (9th Cir. 2020).3

PETITION DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Membership of Performance Review Board

April 26, 2001.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby provides notice of 
the membership of its Performance Review Board (PRB). This action is 
undertaken in accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., Section 4314(c)(4). The 
Commission's PRB will be comprised of the following members:

Thomas R. Herlihy
Daniel L. Larcamp
Cynthia A. Marlette

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10781 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Clear All

        19 April 2022    

                    Navy Week returning to the Motor City                 
                MILLINGTON, Tenn. – The U.S. Navy is preparing to bring Navy Week back to Detroit, July 11-17, with 50 to 75 Sailors from across the fleet to take part in the service’s signature outreach program. Detroit Navy Week will give the community an opportunity to learn about the Navy, its people and its            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
 Company
 1.
    
    The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March
31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
July 9, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Masahiko GotoName:
    
    Masahiko GotoTitle:
    
    President and Representative Director,Chief Executive Officer
 Date:
July 9, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Yoji AokiName:
    
    Yoji AokiTitle:
    
    Director, General Manager of AdministrationHeadquarters,
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1365-DR]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi, (FEMA-1365-DR), dated April 17, 2001, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 27, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of April 17, 2001:

Leake and Neshoba Counties for Individual Assistance (already 
designated for Public Assistance).
Pontotoc County for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Robert J. Adamcik,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-11360 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


 


November 25, 2019


 


Daniel Davison


[***]


 


Dear Dan:


 


As you are aware, Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc.
(the “Company”) is in negotiations with UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and its affiliates (“UHG”)
for UHG to acquire the Company (the “Potential Transaction”). While the specific terms of the Potential Transaction
are still being negotiated and nothing is final, we foresee the Potential Transaction closing in early 2020.


 


The Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc. Executive Severance
Plan (the “Plan”) provides certain “Severance Benefits” in the event of a “Qualifying Termination,”
which is defined as a termination of a participant’s employment by the Company without “Cause” or a participant’s
resignation for “Good Reason,” or a “CIC Qualifying Termination” which is a Qualifying Termination that
occurs within twelve (12) months following the consummation of a “Change in Control.” As a result of ongoing negotiations
with UHG and at the request of UHG, the Company is asking for your consent, as a participant in the Plan, to the following amendments
to the Plan and your Participation and Restrictive Covenant Agreement, in each case, (A) subject to and effective as of the closing
of the Potential Transaction and (B) notwithstanding any provision in the Plan that may restrict amendment of the Plan:


 


		1.	The definition of “Monthly CIC Severance Amount” will be revised to read as follows:



 


“Monthly
CIC Severance Amount” shall mean Participant’s Monthly Base Salary.


 


		2.	The definition of “Monthly Severance Amount” (as defined in your Participation and
Restrictive Covenant Agreement) will be revised to read as follows:



 


“Monthly
Severance Amount” shall mean Participant’s Monthly Base Salary.


 


Except with respect to the amendments described
herein, all terms of the Plan and your Participation and Restrictive Covenant Agreement shall continue to apply without modification.


 






    


     


    

 


To confirm your understanding of and agreement
to the foregoing, please sign below and return one duplicate original of this letter to Christina Flint. You should keep the other
duplicate original for your records.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc.




 


 


	 	By:	 /s/Brian Griffin
	 	Name: Brian Griffin
	 	Title: Chairman & CEO




 


I understand and agree to the terms of the foregoing.


 


	By:	/s/Daniel Davison	 
	 	Daniel Davison	 




 


	Date:	November 25, 2019
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00324

- CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

John D. DELOACH

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 12, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 130556

Honorable Scott Roberts, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the county court at law’s judgment is

REVERSED

, and judgment is RENDERED reinstating the municipal court’s judgment.

SIGNED November 19, 2014.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
### NUMBER 13 - 1 7 - 00 596 - C R 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RAMON JOEL PENA , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 3 47 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.



## SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam

A ppellant ’ s brief was originally due on March 7, 2018 . On May 14, 2018 , this Court granted appellant’s second motion for extension of time and directed appellant to file the brief on or before June 7, 2018

. Counsel failed to file a brief and on July 26, 2018, this Court abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court for further2

proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. On December 18, 2018, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel on grounds counsel is overwhelmed with work and has been unable to complete the brief. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel a nd appointment of new counsel rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State , 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.

-- Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of
this issue. Accordingly, the appeal remains abated and the trial court is directed to determine whether appellant ’ s court

- appointed attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant ’ s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with th e Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
It is so ordered. Per Curiam3

Do not pu blish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2 (b)

. Delivered and filed th e 3rd d ay of January , 201 9.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23000-23001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the South Carolina 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the South Carolina Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
1 p.m. and adjourn at 5 p.m. on Thursday, May 31, 2001, at the Adam's 
Mark Columbia, 1200 Hampton Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. The 
purpose of the meeting is to meet with invited representatives of the 
South Carolina Department of Education who will update the Committee on 
the progress and/or problems regarding the implementation of the South 
Carolina Education Accountability Act of 1998.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation

[[Page 23001]]

to the Committee, should contact Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the 
Southern Regional Office, 404-562-7000 (TDD 404-562-7004). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, May 1, 2001.
Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-11368 Filed 5-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hampshire Funding, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Ronald R. Angarella, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Russell C. Simpson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company


/s/ Ronald R. Angarella

Ronald R. Angarella
Chairman and CEO
March 19, 2004


/s/ Russell C. Simpson

Russell C. Simpson
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2004

                                       31
[Cite as Mundo v. Unknown, 2011-Ohio-4377.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us

ROSALYN MUNDO Case No. 2011-04916-AD 

 Plaintiff Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

 v. ENTRY OF DISMISSAL 

UNKNOWN 

 Defendant 

 

{¶1} On March 30, 2011, the court issued a Return of Complaint Form/Direction 

to Complete Form ordering plaintiff to file a corrected complaint providing the name and 

address of an appropriate defendant. Plaintiff was also was ordered to either pay the 

$25 filing fee or to file a poverty statement. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court 

orders. Therefore, plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Civ.R. 

41(B)(1). The court shall absorb the costs of this case. 

 ________________________________ 

 DANIEL R. BORCHERT 

 Deputy Clerk 

cc: 

Rosalyn Mundo 

8601 Rosewood Avenue 

Cleveland, Ohio 44105 

DRB/laa 

Filed 5/26/11 

Sent to S.C. reporter 8/26/11
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 842 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 842

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Courthouse to be constructed in Jackson, 
    Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Courthouse to be constructed at the site bounded 
on the north by Court Street, on the west by West Street, on the south 
by South Street, and on the east by President Street in Jackson, 
Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``R. Jess Brown 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``R. Jess Brown United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 842

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States Courthouse to be constructed in Jackson, 
    Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States Courthouse''.
```
# CE2010265EN.01003502.xml

| 30.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 265/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 265/35

---

Tuesday 20 October 2009Conservation of wild birds (codified version) ***I

P7_TA(2009)0034

European Parliament legislative resolution of 20 October 2009 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conservation of wild birds (codified version) (COM(2009)0129 – C6-0102/2009 – 2009/0043(COD))

2010/C 265 E/13

(Codecision procedure – codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2009)0129),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0102/2009),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 - Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 86 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0024/2009),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---