alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11299]



[[Page 22560]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 29, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Commerce Financial Corporation ESOP, Topeka, Kansas; to acquire 
up to 35 percent of the voting shares of Commerce Financial 
Corporation, Topeka, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire Commerce 
Bank & Trust, Topeka, Kansas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. Washington First Financial Group, Inc., Seattle, Washington; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of Washington First International Bank, Seattle, Washington.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 1, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-11299 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Donald E. Milmore, Appellant, v Carlton Holmes et al., as Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Fayetteville, Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Special Term, Balio, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Balio, J.—art 78.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
CP-1439

UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE (09/19)

REPORTS REQUEST FORM

REPORTS PROCESSING SECTION

119 D Street, NE

WASHINGTON, DC 20510

(Please Type or Print Legibly)

Complete as much information as possible *Please note that while requests for information can routinely be 

completed 7-10 days from the date of report, in some instances it may take longer.

1. REQUESTOR NAME (Last, First, Middle) 2. DATE OF REQUEST

3. REQUESTOR BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION 4. PHONE NUMBER 5. FAX NUMBER

6. EMAIL ADDRESS (if applicable)

7. CAPITOL FILE NUMBER (CFN) 8. CENTRAL COMPLAINT NUMBER (CCN)

9. TYPE OF REPORT 10. DATE OF REPORT

 ACCIDENT  OFFENSE  INCIDENT 

IF CFN OR CCN IS UNKNOWN PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING, IF KNOWN, TO ASSIST IN 

SEARCHING FOR THIS RECORD

11. NAME OF REPORTING OFFICER 12. PIN NUMBER OF REPORTING OFFICER

13. NAME OF PERSON(S) INVOLVED

14. DATE OF EVENT 15. TIME OF EVENT 16. LOCATION OF EVENT

REPORTS PROCESSING SECTION ONLY

17. NAME OF RPS PROCESSOR

18. INFORMATION 

 FOUND YES  NO  19. DATE ACTION  TAKEN

20. ACTION TAKEN

 FAXED  EMAILED  MAILED  PICKED UP IN PERSON 

 

 NOTIFIED REQUESTOR THAT REQUEST CANNOT BE COMPLETED. REQUESTED 

 INFORMATION IS NOT PUBLIC INFORMATION AND CANNOT BE RELEASED 
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-15 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-15 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-15 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
SCWC

- 20

- 0000545

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

, Respondent / Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

v.

ROMAN SEMES

, Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appellant

______________________________ __________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

( CAAP

- 20

- 0000 545 ; C ase No. 2PC 151001014 (3) )

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

The a pplication for writ of certiorari filed on

September 9

, 2022 by Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appellant Roman Semes

i s hereby reject ed

.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, October 31 , 202 2

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-20-0000545

31-OCT-2022

10:36 AM

Dkt. 12 ODAC
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**RULE 13a – 14(a)

I, David A Almeida,certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis Form 10-K of Axsys Technologies, Inc.

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.                  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.                 Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

c.                  Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a.                  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and

b.                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| February 23, 2005    |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| /s/ DAVID A. ALMEIDA      |   |   |
| David A. Almeida          |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |   |
|                           |        |  |

 

----
#                                                                         Pharmacy tech fills medical capability aboard USS Arleigh Burke                                                                    

##### by Bobbie A. Camp, Naval Medical Forces Atlantic Public Affairs and Outreach

25 July 2023

Tags:
**USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51)**Corpsman**TCCC**Navy medicine**Naval Medical Forces Altantic
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22266-22267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11060]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Office of Federal Procurement Policy; Determination of Executive 
Compensation Benchmark Amount Pursuant to Section 808 of Public Law 
105-85

AGENCY: Office of Federal Procurement Policy, OMB.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is hereby publishing 
the attached memorandum to heads of agencies concerning the 
determination of the maximum ``benchmark'' compensation that will be 
allowable under government contracts during contractors' FY 2001--
$374,228. This determination is required to be made pursuant to section 
808 of Pub. L. 105-85. It applies equally to both defense and civilian 
procurement agencies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard C. Loeb, Executive Secretary, 
Cost Accounting Standards Board, OFPP on (202) 395-3254.

Sean O'Keefe,
Deputy Director.

To The Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies

Subject: Determination of Executive Compensation Benchmark Amount 
Pursuant to Section 808 of Pub. L. 105-85

    This memorandum sets forth the ``benchmark compensation amount'' 
as required by section 39 of the Office of Federal Procurement 
Policy (OFPP) Act (41 U.S.C. 435), as amended. Under section 39, the 
``benchmark compensation amount'' is ``the median amount of the 
compensation provided for all senior executives of all benchmark 
corporations for the most recent year for which data is available.'' 
The ``benchmark compensation amount'' established as directed by 
section 39 limits the allowability of compensation costs under 
government contracts. The ``benchmark

[[Page 22267]]

compensation amount'' does not limit the compensation that an 
executive may otherwise receive.
    Based on a review of commercially available surveys of executive 
compensation and after consultation with the Director of the Defense 
Contract Audit Agency, I have determined pursuant to the 
requirements of section 39 that the benchmark compensation amount 
for contractor fiscal year 2001 is $374,228. This benchmark 
compensation amount is to be used for contractor fiscal year 2001, 
and subsequent contractor fiscal years, unless and until revised by 
OMB. This benchmark compensation amount applies to contract costs 
incurred after January 1, 2001, under covered contracts of both the 
defense and civilian procurement agencies as specified in section 
808 of Pub. L. 105-85.
    Questions concerning this memorandum may be addressed to Richard 
C. Loeb, Executive Secretary, Cost Accounting Standards Board, OFPP, 
on (202) 395-3254.

Sean O'Keefe,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 01-11060 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-U
##### 



Exhibit 20.2 ANNUAL AGGREGATE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS STATEMENT
MELLON BANK PREMIUM FINANCE LOAN MASTER TRUST SERIES 2002-1
ANNUAL PERIOD ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2003 ANNUAL HOLDERS DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY Pursuant to Section 5.2, Servicer does hereby declare to the Trustee
the following distributions for the calendar year 2003 as set forth
below: Interest Payments  A.
    
    Pursuant to subsection 4.11(g); 1.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Class A Holders
    
    
    6,020,009.202.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Class B Holders
    
    
    466,093.244.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder
    
    
    965,852.55
 Principal Payments  B.
    
    Pursuant to subsection 4.11(h)(i); 1.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Class A Holders
    
    $
    0.002.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Class B Holders
    
    $
    0.003.
    
    
    Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder
    
    $
    0.00
 AFCO CREDIT CORPORATION, as ServicerBy /s/ C. Leonard OConnellName: C. Leonard OConnellTitle: Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
 E-3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Melvin Brown, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), all rendered May 2, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 1094/83, burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 1101/83, and burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 2997/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and two judgments of the same court (Hellenbrand, J.), also rendered May 2, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 5518/83, and robbery in the third degree under indictment No. 6435/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty to five different felonies committed on five separate dates over the course of the year 1983. On appeal he argues that his application for a *Wade*hearing relative to indictment No. 5518/83 was improperly denied, that all of his allocutions were inadequate as a matter of law, and that his sentences were excessive. The defendant’s contentions are without merit.

Under the facts of this case, the defendant’s motion did not provide a sufficient factual basis for the court to conduct a *Wade*hearing *(see, People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023).

The defendant’s claim that his plea allocutions were insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review in that he failed to move to withdraw his pleas prior to sentencing (CPL 220.60 [3]; 470.05 [2]; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Pendergrass,*115 AD2d 497). In any event, there was no flaw in the allocutions challenged on this appeal. The defendant himself either related or concurred in all of the underlying facts making out the crimes. He was represented throughout by competent counsel, and was informed of and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights before the sentencing courts. There has been no showing of prejudice *(see, People v Harris,*
      *75561 NY2d 9; *People v Nixon,*21 NY2d 338; *People v Dixon,*119 AD2d 831; *People v Colon,*77 AD2d 370).

Finally, the sentences imposed were those promised to the defendant at the time of the pleas. Accordingly, the defendant has no basis to complain that the sentences were excessive *(People v Buitrago,*125 AD2d 322; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01544-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05338-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN 

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,

Appellant

v.

TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Appellee

______________________ 

2018-1894

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-

01633.

______________________ 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“LA Metro”) petitioned for inter partes review of 

claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,980,101, 

owned by Transport Technologies LLC. The Patent Trial 

and Appeal Board (“Board”) held that LA Metro did not 

show unpatentability. LA Metro appeals. 

We recently affirmed a decision by the Board holding 

the same claims of the same patent unpatentable as invalid 

for obviousness. Transp. Techs., LLC v. L.A. Cty. Metro. 
2 LA COUNTY METRO v. TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Transp. Auth., No. 18-1412, 748 F. App’x 325 (Fed. Cir. 

Jan. 9, 2019). 

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation 

Authority is ordered to show cause why the appeal 

should not be dismissed as moot. The response 

shall be filed no later than seven days after the date 

of issuance of this Order.

(2) Any response by Transport Technologies shall be 

filed no later than five days after the filing of the

response to this Order.

 FOR THE COURT

February 11, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
HYNES & HOWES INSURANCE COUNSELORS, INC.
                            Comparative Balance Sheet
                           September 30, 1998 and 1997


                                                            September 30,
        Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity              1998            1997
Current Liabilities:
   Buyers Escrow                                 $     7,688     $     7,246
   Other Current Liabilities                               0             500

      Total Current Liabilities                  $     7,688     $     7,746

      Total Liabilities                          $     7,688     $     7,746


Stockholders' Equity:
   Capital Stock, no par value, 100,000,000
      Shares Authorized, 11,260,675 shares
      Issued (Note 5)                            $ 3,780,765     $ 3,780,765
   Paid in Capital (Note 6)                              100             100
   Retained Earnings (Deficit)                    (3,070,740)     (3,087,380)
   Treasury Stock, at Cost                           (33,252)        (33,252)

      Total Stockholders' Equity                 $   676,873     $   660,233

      Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $   684,561     $   667,979


Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
EXHIBIT 22

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements pertaining to the 401(k) Retirement Plan of Axsys Technologies, Inc.
of our report dated February 28, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Axsys Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



|                                     |  |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLPERNST & YOUNG LLP
|------------------------------------ |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Hartford, Connecticut
March 24, 2003 |  |  |                                      

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6971-8]


Draft Public Involvement Policy--Extension of Public Comment 
Period and Announcement of Public Dialogue

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of public comment period and announcement of 
public dialogue.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published its draft Public 
Involvement Policy on December 28, 2000 and requested public comments 
through April 27, 2001 (65 FR 82335, Dec. 28, 2000). EPA now extends 
this public comment period through July 31, 2001. This extension will 
allow the agency to convene an on-line public dialogue on the draft 
Public Involvement Policy. This dialogue, which will be an interactive 
discussion on the Internet, will provide additional opportunities for 
the public to provide feedback on issues relating to the draft policy. 
The dialogue will be held during two weeks in the summer of 2001 and 
will be announced on the EPA web page at http://www.epa.gov/stakeholders. To request direct e-mail notification of the dialogue, 
send a message to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ffcfbeee4eae7e0e3ebeafdfccfeaffeea1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c6f687d777974737078796e6f5c796c7d327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>. The draft policy is posted on 
the web at http://www.epa.gov/stakeholders/policy.htm. EPA's Office of 
Policy, Economics and Innovation will maintain all public comments on 
the draft Public Involvement Policy in a docket that is available to 
the public. In addition, EPA may post all comments on the Internet, 
unless commenters request otherwise.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until July 31, 2001. The on-line 
dialogue will be held in June or July, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Patricia A. Bonner, United States 
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Economics and 
Innovation (MC 1807), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20460, 
by facsimile to 202-260-4903, or by electronic mail to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0271766369676a6d6e66677071426772632c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="205354414b45484f4c44455253604550410e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Bonner at 202-260-0599 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#debcb1b0b0bbacf0aebfaaacb7bdb7bf9ebbaebff0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5c7cacbcbc0d78bd5c4d1d7ccc6ccc4e5c0d5c48bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.

Jay Benforado,
Principal Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Economics 
and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 01-10807 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                      EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Number 333-42741) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
of Grubb & Ellis Company of our report dated August 18, 1997 (except for 
Note 1(k), as to which the date is March 21, 1998) with respect to the
financial statements of Grubb & Ellis Company and Subsidiaries included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended June 30, 1997,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


  

                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Chicago, Illinois
March 21, 1998