alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, James C. Minerly, Senior Financial Officer of enherent Corp., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of enherent Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ James C. Minerly    
|James C. Minerly        
|Senior Financial Officer
|January 25, 2005
Clear All

        11 January 2024    

                    USS Bataan, USS Carter Hall and 26th MEU(SOC) Arrive in Piraeus, Greece                 
                The Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5), Harpers Ferry-class amphibious dock landing ship USS Carter Hall (LSD 50), and embarked 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) (MEU(SOC)) arrived in Piraeus, Greece, Jan. 11, 2024, for a regularly scheduled port visit            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10193

CHARLES KALLASSY

Plaintiff–Appellant

v.

CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION

Defendant–Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas

No. 3:04-CV-727

Before KING, DeMOSS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff–appellant Charles Kallassy appeals the district court’s summary

judgment in favor of defendant–appellee Cirrus Design Corporation (“Cirrus”)

on his Texas state law negligence and products liability claims. Kallassy

contends that he presented evidence on the elements of defect and causation,

which raised fact questions sufficient to survive summary judgment. Kallassy

argues that expert testimony was not necessary to establish that his Cirrus

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 6, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10193

2

SR22 was defective due to excessive vibration in the cockpit, and that this

vibration caused him to develop peripheral neuropathy. He further argues that

the district court improperly struck his treating physician’s affidavit offered to

establish causation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B), Federal

Rule of Evidence 702, and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S.

579 (1993), without conducting an in limine hearing. 

Under Texas law, when “a lay person’s general experience and common

sense will not enable that person to determine the issue, expert testimony is

required.” Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rios, 143 S.W.3d 107, 118 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2004, pet. denied). Here, the district court prudently

determined that the “level at which aircraft vibration becomes sufficiently

excessive as to constitute an unreasonably dangerous defect is a technical matter

beyond the common experience of jurors,” requiring expert testimony. Further,

the district court acted well within its discretion in disallowing the causation

portion of the affidavit of Kallassy’s treating physician, an orthopedic surgeon

who never claimed to be an expert in neurology, because he could not offer

reliable expert opinion sufficient to fulfill the requirements of Federal Rule of

Evidence 702.

The district court’s thorough and detailed memorandum and order stating

its reasons for granting Cirrus’s motion for summary judgment comprehensively

addressed each and every one of Kallassy’s arguments. Because we cannot

improve upon the reasoning of the district court, we AFFIRM the judgment for

the reasons stated by the district court.
Item 5.  Legal Proceedings

None

Item 6.  Increases and Decreases in Outstanding Securities and Indebtedness

    (a)  In the fiscal year, Registrant has not issued any new shares or
         otherwise created additional outstanding securities; neither has it
         reduced outstanding securities by purchase or acquisition of treasury
         shares.  Therefore, there were 11,222,600 shares of Registrant's stock
         outstanding on September 30, 1996.

    (b)  None

    (c)  None

Item 7.  Changes in Securities and Changes in Security for Registered Securities

         None

Item 8.  Defaults upon Senior Securities

         None

Item 9.  Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders

         The approximate number of holders of each class of equity securities of
         Registrant, as of September 30, 1996, is indicated in the following
         table:


           (2)                                   (2)
     TITLE OF CLASS                 NUMBER OF RECORD HOLDERS

     Common Stock,                       Approximately 4,774
     no par value


Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

         On February 3, 1986, Harold L. Luebken was elected a member of the
         Board of Directors and to the office of President.

         On July 12, 1983, Dan B. Davis was elected to the Board of Directors.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7660

THOMAS EVERETTE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

REGINA W. PEELE; CREDITED SOLUTIONS; KIM D. SAUNDER; HAROLD 

G. SELLARS; MECHANICS AND FARMERS BANKS; THOMAS W. KING; THE 

LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS W. KING; W. DUDLEY WHITLEY, III; SCOTT 

A. MCKELLAR; DAVID W. GREEN; BATTLE, WINSLOW, SCOTT AND 

WILEY P.A.; LAWYER MUTUAL; CRYSTAL BROWN; URSULA SHORT; 

CAROL A. WHITE; EDGECOMBE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT; DENNIS A. 

COLEY; BRIAN T. COREY; IVORY JOHNSON; JAMES I. KNIGHT; 

EDGECOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE; EDGECOMBE COUNTY ANIMAL; 

EDGECOMBE COUNTY; JANET WATSON; WATSON PROPERTY CORPORATION; 

B. C. EASON, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:14-cv-00213-BO)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Everette, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Everette, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 

civil complaint after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. 

Limiting our review to the issues raised in Everette’s 

objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 

and his informal brief, see Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841,

845–46 (4th Cir. 1985); 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. Everette v. Peele, No. 5:14-cv00213-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05431-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance of permit for incidental take of endangered species.

                    On April 20, 2000, a notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (Vol. 65, No. 77 FR 21203) that an application had been filed with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) by Magic Carpet Woods Association (Association), Traverse City, Michigan, for a permit to incidentally take, pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1539), as amended, piping plover (                    *Charadrius melodus*) on Lake Michigan shoreline owned by the Association pursuant to the terms of the Associations' Habitat Conservation Plan.                 

Notice is hereby given that on March 20, 2001, as authorized by the provisions of the Act, the Service issued a permit (TE-025433) to the above named party subject to certain conditions set forth therein. The permit was granted only after the Service determined that it was applied for in good faith, that granting the permit will not be to the disadvantage of the endangered species, and that it will be consistent with the purposes and policy set forth in the Endangered Species Act, as amended. 

Additional information on this permit may be requested by contacting Peter Fasbender, at (612)713-5343, peter_fasbender@fws.gov. 

Dated: April 16, 2001. 

Charlie Wooley, 

Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort Snelling, Minnesota.

[FR Doc. 01-11191 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                                 SUBSIDIARIES
                                      OF
                             BMC INDUSTRIES, INC.



1.    Buckbee-Mears Europe GmbH
2.    BMC Industries Foreign Sales Corporation
3.    Buckbee-Mears Hungary Kft.
4.    Vision-Ease Lens, Inc.
5.    Vision-Ease Lens Azusa, Inc.
6.    Vision-Ease Europe Limited
7.    Vision-Ease Canada, Ltd.
8.    P. T. Vision-Ease Asia, joint venture with P.T. Astron Lensindo Nusa
9.    Buckbee-Mears Holding Company B.V.
10.   Buckbee-Mears European Holding Company B.V.
11.   Buckbee-Mears Deutschland Holding GmbH
12.   Vision-Ease France SAS
13.   Vision-Ease Deutschland GmbH
**Exhibit23**

 
| May 27, 2010 |   |
|-------------------|--------|

 

OakridgeEnergy, Inc.

4613Jacksboro Highway

WichitaFalls, Tx 76302

 
| Re:    |   | Valuation  of Oakridge Energy, Inc.   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   | As  of February 28, 2010              |
|   |   | Oakridge  Energy, Inc’s Interest      |
|   |   | Stephens  Engineering Consent to           |
|   |   | Utilize  Valuation Report                  |
|   |   | Colorado,  Mississippi, Oklahoma and Texas |

 

Gentlemen:

 

Peryour request, Stephens Engineering hereby gives Oakridge Energy, Inc.consent to utilize the Valuation of Oakridge Energy, Inc. report with anAs of Date of February 28, 2010 for use of their choice including but notlimited to their Securities & Exchange Commission filings.

 

Pleasecontact us if additional information or authority to utilize the report isneeded.

 
|   | Yours  very truly,                        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                                      |
|   | STEPHENS &  JOHNSON OPERTING CO. |
|   | TBPE  No. F-2125                     |
|   |                                      |
|   |                                      |
|   | /s/  Fred Stephens                        |
|   | Fred  Stephens                            |
|   |                                      |
| FS/jw  |                                      |

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT
                        --------------------------------


Image Entertainment, Inc.
Chatsworth, California


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-43241, 33-55393 and 33-57336) all on Form S-8 of Image Entertainment, Inc. of
our report dated June 6, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Image Entertainment, Inc. as of March 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1997, and the related
schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of Image Entertainment, Inc.

                              /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Los Angeles, California
June 6, 1997
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Nationwide Life Insurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, W.G. Jurgensen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 1, 2007



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ W.G. Jurgensen            
|Name: W.G. Jurgensen          
|Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nationwide Life Insurance Company and will be retained by Nationwide Life Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2009154EN.01001901.xml

| 7.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/19

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 154/09

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Le Havre–Lyon (Saint Éxupéry) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 25.10.2009 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Arrêté of 4 June 2009 imposing PSO between Le Havre and yon (Saint Éxupéry)
  NOR: DEVA0911585A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do





  Directorate General for Civil Aviation |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tél. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies@dta.aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Concerned route

Le Havre–Lyon (Saint Éxupéry)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

25.10.2009

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Arrêté of 4 June 2009 imposing PSO between Le Havre and yon (Saint Éxupéry)

NOR: DEVA0911585A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

Directorate General for Civil Aviation

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris cedex 15

FRANCE

Tél. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies@dta.aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
#### CINCINNATI, N. O. & T. P. RY. CO. v. CRAIG.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 2, 1913.)

No. 2,379.

Railroads (§ 400*)—Liability xtor Injury *to*Persons on Track—Keeping Lookout.

Evidence in an action to recover for the death of children killed by a train on defendant’s railroad *held*to justify the court in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant on the ground that those in charge of the engine used every possible means to stop the train as soon as the children appeared as an obstruction on the track, and so brought defendant within the protection of Shannon’s Code Tenn. § 1574, subd. 4, and to sustain a verdict for plaintiff.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Railroads, Cent. Dig. §§ 1365-1381; Dec. Dig. § *400.****

Care required of railroads as to trespassers on or near track, see note to Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Womack, 97 C. C. A. 566.]

*51In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee; Edward T. Sanford, Judge.

Action at law by J. B. Craig, administrator of Eva and May Craig, against the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Affirmed..

Horace M. Carr, of Harriman, Tenn., for plaintiff in error.

J. C. J. Williams, of Huntsville, Tenn., and Cassell & Harris, of • Harriman, Tenn., for defendant in error.

Before KNAPPEN and DENISON, Circuit Judges, and COCHRAN, District Judge.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The intestate children of defendant in error were struck and killed by the locomotive engine of plaintiff in error, and recovery had under consolidated action. The meritorious question presented by the motion to direct verdict is whether it appears by substantially undisputed testimony that those in charge of the engine used every possible means to stop the train as soon as the children appeared as an obstruction on the track, and so brought the defendant within the protection of the Tennessee Precautions Act (Shannon’s Code, § 1574, subd. 4). _ _

_ _ Giving to the testimony a construction most favorable to plaintiff, we think it would tend to support a conclusion that the children should have been seen 400 to 500 feet ahead of the engine, but that they were not in fact seen, and therefore no attempt made to stop the engine, or to. give the statutory warnings, until they were but 175 feet away.

The judgments are accordingly affirmed, with costs.