alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PACIFIC SECURITY FINANCIAL, INC.
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-EXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Security Financial, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L.
Guthrie, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


Dated: October 27, 2003



/s/ David L. Guthrie
---------------------------
David L. Guthrie, President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Nationwide Life Insurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, W.G. Jurgensen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 29, 2008



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ W.G. Jurgensen            
|Name: W.G. Jurgensen          
|Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nationwide Life Insurance Company and will be retained by Nationwide Life Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
FORM 10-K, DATED DEC 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,682,131
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,650,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     24,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      23,864,557
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        23,869,050
<LOANS>                                     94,569,025
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,233,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             131,275,349
<DEPOSITS>                                 117,350,945
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,626,794
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       356,844
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,676,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             131,275,349
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,682,475
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,335,139
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               664,985
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,682,599
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,571,268
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,571,268
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,111,331
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  240,895
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,907,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,560,386
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,560,386
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   944,556
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .078
<LOANS-NON>                                    351,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               714,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,070,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  128,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    50,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,233,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           268,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        965,000
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*WALTER W. HINDS, SR.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 557 (AC 24687), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*916
      *Alice Osedach,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Nancy L. Chupak,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 23, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 

ANGEL SERRANO, 07-CV-04516 (AKH) 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

-againstNOTICE OF DEFENDANT VERIZON 

NEW YORK INC.’S ADOPTION OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

VERIZON NEW YORK INC., 

et al.

 

 

Defendants. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Verizon New York Inc. (“Verizon”) 

hereby adopts as its Answer in the instant case its Answer to Plaintiffs’ Master Complaint which 

was filed and served on October 16, 2007 in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower 

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). In accordance with Case Management 

Order No. 4, the allegations of the instant Check-Off Complaint are deemed to be denied. 

Verizon also incorporates by reference all averments and denials of its Answer to Plaintiffs’ 

Master Complaint as though same were more fully set forth herein at length. Verizon further 

adopts the responses contained in any Amended Answer filed and served herein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Verizon reserves the right to file and 

serve an amended answer and specifically reserves the right to interpose cross-claims and thirdparty claims. 

WHEREFORE, Verizon demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against Verizon, together with its cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 28 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Dated: November 26, 2007 /s/ Eric F. Leon 

Eric F. Leon 

Lee Ann Stevenson 

Andrew Dunlap 

Michael D. Reisman 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Citigroup Center 

153 East 53rd Street 

New York, New York 10022-4611 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Attorneys for Defendant Verizon New York Inc.

TO: Christopher LoPalo, Esq. 

WORBY GRONER EDELMAN & NAPOLI BERN, LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

 Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

ROBERT A. GROCHOW, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

 Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATA 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 Marc D. Weinblatt, Esq. 

SANDERS, SANDERS, BLOCK, WOYICK, VIENER & GROSSMAN, P.C. 

100 Herricks Road 

Mineola, New York 11501 

 David Kremen, Esq. 

OSHMAN & MIRISOLA, LLP 

42 Broadway, 10th Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

 

All Defense Counsel (via ECF)

Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 28 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
#                                                                         U.S. 2nd Fleet, U.S. Coast Guard and Royal Canadian Navy hold Frontier Sentinel Table Top Exercise                                                                    

##### by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Anderson W. Branch

17 June 2022
NORFOLK, Va. -- U.S. 2nd Fleet (C2F), U.S. Coast Guard Atlantic Area, and the Canadian Armed Forces’ Joint Task Force Atlantic participated in the 2022 Frontier Sentinel tabletop exercise (TTX) at Navy Warfare Development Command on Naval Station Norfolk, June 13-15.

Frontier Sentinel is an annual exercise between the three organizations that is the penultimate activity for ensuring the ability of the tri-party commands and tactical assets to work together. It places particular emphasis on highlighting challenges to interoperability and identifying solutions.

 “We are exercising joint and allied operational capabilities and working together to hone our competitive edge. The commandant has said we will be a more adaptive and connected U.S. Coast Guard that generates sustained readiness, resilience, and capability in new ways. Our work in this exercise is vital to that end,” said Vice Adm. Kevin Lunday, commander of U.S. Coast Guard Atlantic Area. “The U.S. Coast Guard is fully interoperable with the U.S. Navy and Royal Canadian Navy, and together we are ensuring readiness for strategic competition against malign actors who seek to undermine established international norms.”

During the first two days, the staffs conducted the Frontier Sentinel TTX, designed to test communication and information methods, rules of engagement, and command and control in an operation involving all three operational commands. This year’s exercise was led by the U.S. Coast Guard.

“Alliances and partnerships are a force multiplier. Serving together, studying together, and participating in exercises together only increase our combined operational readiness,” said Rear Adm. Steven Waddell, vice commander of U.S. 2nd Fleet. “Frontier Sentinel is a yearly opportunity to determine best practices to ensure we are ready to operate at the high-end, together, when we are called to do so.”

The final day of the event consisted of a planning conference for Frontier Sentinel 2023, where the senior leaders from all three commands gathered to review the results of the TTX and discuss the way forward in the year to come.

U.S. 2nd Fleet, reestablished in 2018 in response to the changing global security environment, develops and employs maritime forces ready to fight across multiple domains in the Atlantic and Arctic in order to ensure access, deter aggression and defend U.S., allied, and partner interests.

For more information, please visit  www.navy.mil, www.facebook.com/usnavy, or www.twitter.com/usnavy.

Tags:
**Second Fleet**Royal Canadian Navy**Naval Warfare Development Command**Tabletop Exercise**2nd Fleet**U.S. 2nd Fleet**Joint Task Force Atlantic**Coast Guard
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 9 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 19 of 19
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Charles F. Cargile, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Newport Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule
13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2005 |  | /s/ Charles F. Cargile                                      
|                     |  | Charles F. Cargile                                          
|                     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
|                     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                               



A signed original of this written
statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Newport Corporation and will be retained by Newport Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHEMI-TROL
CHEMICAL CO. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          80,991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,838,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                   310,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,799,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,616,553
<PP&E>                                      20,501,534
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,459,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,592,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,185,837
<BONDS>                                     14,493,279
<COMMON>                                     4,590,767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,131,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,592,539
<SALES>                                     70,007,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,048,476
<CGS>                                       60,622,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,622,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                95,898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,391,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,446,705
<INCOME-TAX>                                   972,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,474,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,474,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 24-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 24-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22263-22264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-39,031]


IER, Inc. Temple, TX; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 16, 2001 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at IER, Inc., Temple, Texas.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
is already

[[Page 22264]]

in effect (TA-W-37,848, as amended). Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 18th day of April, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-11100 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-19 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 16 of 16
#### Beth E. Zwirn, Appellant, v Robert I. Zwirn, Respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ra-*855din, J.H.O.), dated August 8, 1988, as granted ancillary relief in accordance with the terms of a stipulation of settlement dated June 15, 1988, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated August 25, 1988, which denied the plaintiffs motion for reargument of her motion to set aside the stipulation of settlement. The appeal from the judgment brings up for review a ruling denying the plaintiffs motion to vacate the stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

"It is well settled that stipulations of settlement meet with judicial favor, especially where, as here, the terms are read into the record in open court and the party seeking to vacate the stipulation was represented by competent counsel. * * * Absent a showing that the stipulation was the product of fraud, overreaching, mistake or duress, such a stipulation will not be disturbed by the court” *(Bossom v Bossom,*141 AD2d 794, 795).

Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the plaintiffs allegations constitute an insufficient basis on which to vacate the stipulation of settlement in this action *(cf., Polito v Polito,*121 AD2d 614). We note that at the time of the stipulation, the plaintiff, who was capably represented by competent counsel, was repeatedly and painstakingly questioned by the Judicial Hearing Officer as to her willingness to enter into the stipulation. It would appear from the record that the plaintiff merely has had a change of heart. Rubin, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT APRIL 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL
30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         624,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,257,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 22,537,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,160,000
<PP&E>                                      71,124,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,374,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,044,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,460,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,918,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,044,000
<SALES>                                     41,894,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,894,000
<CGS>                                       12,854,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,421,000<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             149,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,470,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   125,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,345,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,345,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<FN>
<F1>PROVISION FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND INVENTORY PROVISION INCLUDED IN TOTAL
COSTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>