FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT APRIL17, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]

I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 14765 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 6 - 0 0 2 8 7 - CV - J - 3 2 - M CR R O N N I E J O N E S , P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s N A S S A U C O U N T Y C O R R E C T I O N A L O F F I C E R S , J . S T O U T , C o rr e c tio n a l O f

f ic e r , O F C . O R R , C o rr e c tio n a l O f

f ic e r , W . W I L S O N , C o rr e c tio n a l O f

f ic e r , O F C . L E E , C o rr e c tio n a l O f

f ic e r , D e f e n d a n ts - A p p e lle e s .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A p r i l17, 2008)2

B efo re M A R C U S , W IL S O N an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: R o n n ie J o n e s , as ta te p r is o n e r , ap p e a ls p r o s e th e s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in f a vorof N a s s au C ountyC orr e c t i ona l O f f i c e r s S t out , O rr , W i l s on, a nd L e e a nd a g a in s t J o n e s ’s c o m p la in t th a t th e o f f ic e r s v io la te dh is c iv il r ig h ts u n d e rth e E ig h th and F ou rt ee nth A m endm ent s. 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3. T he di stri ctcourtrul ed that J one s f a i l e d t o e xhaus ta va i l abl e a dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e di e s unde rthe P r i s on Li t i g a t i o n Re f

o rm A c t . 4 2 U . S. C. § 1 9 9 7 e ( a ) . W e a f f i rm. U nde rs e c t i on 1997e ( a ) , “ [ n] o a c t i on s ha l l be br oughtw i th r e s pe c tt o pr i s on c o n d itio n s u n d e rs e c tio n 1 9 8 3 o f th is title . . . b yap r is o n e rc o n f in e din a n yja il, p r is o n , o rc o rr e c tio n a l f a c ilityu n til s u c h a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s a s a r e a v a ilab le a r e e xhaus t e d. ” T hi s r e qui r e m e ntof e xhaus t i on i s m a nda t ory . J ohns on v. M e a dow s , 418 F . 3d 1152, 1155 ( 11th C i r . 2005) . W e r e vi e w de novo the i nt e rpr e t a t i on of

thi s pr ovi s i on. I d. T he re cord es t abl i shes thatthe j ai l prov i ded an adm i ni stra t i ve gri evance procedure, and Jon es fa i l ed t o com pl y w i th thatprocedure. U nd erthe three -s t ep pr oc e dur e , the i nm a t e w a s r e qui r e d t o not i f ythe s upe rvi s i ng s e r ge a ntof a ny g r ie v a n c e a n d , if

th e m a tte rw a s n o t r e s o lv e do rth e in m a te w a s d is s a tis f ie dw ith the out c om e , the i nm a t e c oul d appe a l t o the l i e ut e na nta nd the n t o the c apt a i n of3

th e ja il. C ap ta in S id n e yB u c kr e c a lle dth a t J o n e s h a db e c o m e c o m b a tiv e w ith o f f ic e r s w h e n h e r e c e iv e d au n if o rm a n dw a s p la c e din a d m in is tr a tiv e c o n f in e m e n t. B oth B uck and the se rgeanti n charge, N ol an C hancey , fi l ed af fi davi t s s t at i ng that J o n e s h a d n o t o r a llyc o m p la in e d o rf ile daw r itte n g r ie v a n c e a f te rth e in c id e n t. T he di s tr i c tc ourtw a s c orr e c tt o e nt e rs um m a ryj udgm e nti n f a vorof the o f f ic e r s . J o n e s p r o d u c e d n o e v id e n c e th a t h e f o llo w e dth e g r ie v a n c e p r o c e d u r e . A lth o u g h J o n e s a lle g e s th a t th e N a s s au C o u n tyJ a il d o e s n o t h a v e a n a d e q u a te g r ie v a n c e p r o c e d u r e , th e a lle g e d in a d e q u a c yo f th e p r o c e d u r e d o e s n o t e x c u s e h is f a i l ur e t o c om pl yw i th i ta ta l l . S e e H i ggi nbott om v. C a rt e r , 223 F . 3d 1259, 1261 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . T h e s u m m aryju d g m e n t in f a v o ro f th e N a s s au C o u n tyo f

f ic e r s is A FFI R M ED .