alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2010285EN.01012401.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 285/124 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 285/124

---

Tuesday 24 November 2009EC-Denmark Agreement on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters *

P7_TA(2009)0078

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2006/325/EC to provide for a procedure for the implementation of Article 5(2) of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (COM(2009)0101 – C6-0109/2009 – 2009/0034(CNS))

2010/C 285 E/27

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2009)0101),

having regard to Articles 61(c) and 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0109/2009),

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0056/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
# CE2010184EN.01021201.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/212 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/212

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 (mobile telephone networks) and Directive 2002/21/EC (electronic communications) ***I

P6_TA(2009)0249

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 on roaming on public mobile telephone networks within the Community and Directive 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (COM(2008)0580 – C6-0333/2008 – 2008/0187(COD))

2010/C 184 E/55

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0580),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0333/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Culture and Education (A6-0138/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0187

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 22 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 on roaming on public mobile telephone networks within the Community and Directive 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 544/2009.)

---
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-01654-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
### September % Tots' \XXArTtf C.rtt" <**/j\0f & IS p.o. L* mot /Wr*, Txi2l\\ 

### ft[e*4t Ucd</,ze4'ii^f >y cvldr&S Us c^^eA. My ^^ ^Jdr^s fe listed lael^
TDcr- sh.cso. u^r RECEIVED IN

1S25 FM 1U QOURTOFCRiMIWAUPpefLS Cuir*,TxT7Wi SIP 10 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of Telecommunications Income Fund XI, L.P. as of
September 30, 1999, and the nine months ended September 30, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          71,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,783,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (205,342)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                              63
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,649,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,314,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,335,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,649,638
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               767,351
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               176,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               119,895
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                427,326
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            427,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   427,326
<EPS-BASIC>                                      50.37<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    50.37<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Net Income (Loss) per Partnership Unit
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,695]


Drummond Company, Inc., Jasper, Alabama; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on February 20, 2001, in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on behalf of workers at Drummond Company, Inc., Jasper, 
Alabama.
    The Department of Labor has determined that the petition is 
invalid. Under the Trade Act of 1974, a petition may be filed by a 
group of three or more workers in an appropriate subdivision of a firm, 
by a company official, or by their union or other duly authorized 
representative. The petitioners are not employees of Drummond Company, 
Jasper, Alabama. The petition was signed by three petitioners who are 
not authorized to file on behalf of workers of the company. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 12th day of April, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-10944 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-16 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-16 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

N RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

JAIME ROJAS (and wife, JOHANNA HERNANDEZ), 07-CV-45 11 (AKH)

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY

100 CHURCH LLC OF

-against- AMENDED ANSWER TO

MASTER COMPLAINT

100 CHURCH LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant 100 CHURCH LLC (hereinafter 100

Church), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption

(Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action,

herein adopt 100 Churchs Amended Answer to Master Complaint dated August 30, 2007, which

was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation,

21 MC 102 (AKU).

WHEREFORE, 100 Church demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action

as against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: New York, New York

September 7, 2007

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneysfor Defendant

100 CHURCH LLC

Is

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 687-0100

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 21 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintjff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

All Other Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 21 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the following

document to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of 100 Church LLCs Adoption of Amended Answer to Master

Complaint.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Caimata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counsellor Plaintjffs

Dated: September 10, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 21 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 11
                                       
               COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                              INCSTAR CORPORATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       
                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                              1995         1994         1993
<S>                                       <C>          <C>          <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:                                
  Average shares outstanding               16,362,916   16,322,301   16,258,929
Dilutive stock options and warrants--                              
based on the treasury stock method (1)        128,585           --      173,954
                                           16,491,501   16,322,301   16,432,883
                                                                  
  Net income (loss)                       $ 4,263,000  $(4,505,000) $   253,000
                                                                  
  Net income (loss) per share             $      0.26  $     (0.28) $      0.02
                                                                  
<FN>                                       
(1) The effects of stock options and warrants were excluded from the calculation
of weighted average shares outstanding for 1994 because their effects were
antidilutive.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
# CE2010137EN.01006601.xml

| 27.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 137/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 137/66

---

Thursday 2 April 2009Community ecolabel scheme ***I

P6_TA(2009)0209

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 April 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community Ecolabel scheme (COM(2008)0401 – C6-0279/2008 – 2008/0152(COD))

2010/C 137 E/20

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0401),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0279/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A6-0105/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Takes note of the Commission declaration annexed to this resolution; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Takes note of the Commission declaration annexed to this resolution;

| 3. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

Thursday 2 April 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0152

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 2 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the EU Ecolabel

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No ....)

---

Thursday 2 April 2009ANNEX

Thursday 2 April 2009COMMISSION DECLARATION

Independently of the adoption of the Ecolabel Regulation, the Commission confirms that it intends to propose a Regulation on eco-labelling of fishery products before the end of this year to be mainly based on criteria for sustainable fishing.

The study foreseen in Article 6(6) of the Ecolabel regulation dealing with additional aspects such as processing, pre-packaging, packaging and transport, which will examine the feasibility of the extension of the scope of the Ecolabel Regulation to food, including the products of fishing and aquaculture, will not influence or prejudge the adoption of this Regulation.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony
Principe, the chief financial officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

      (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                          By:  /s/ ANTHONY PRINCIPE
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                   Anthony Principe
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                On2 Technologies, Inc.
May 5, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Complainant, v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Service Into Markets Operated by the California Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange, Respondents; Docket No. EL00-95-012.

Investigation of Practices of the California Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange; Docket No. EL00-98-000.

California Independent System Operator Corporation; Docket No. RT01-85-000.

Investigation of Wholesale Rates of Public Utility Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services in the Western Systems Coordinating Council; Docket No. EL01-68-000.

Take notice that on April 26, 2001, the Commission issued an order in the above-indicated dockets initiating a proceeding in Docket No. EL01-68-000 under section 206 of the Federal Power Act.

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL01-68-000 will be 60 days after publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11053 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 460 A12 FILED 13 JUNE 2013 JOHN CONNER CONSTRUCTION, INC., R&G CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and EGGERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

v. GRANDFATHER HOLDING COMPANY, LLC and MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY BANK, a Branch of CARTER COUNTY BANK

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 3 2 S.E.2d 3 67 (20 1 2 ), affirming an

o rder entered on 1 5 February 201 1 by Judge Marvin P. Pope, Jr. in Superior Court, Avery County

. On 12 December 2012, the Supreme Court allowed a petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court

on 15 April 2013

.
Tricia Wilson Law Firm, PLLC, by Patricia L. Wilson; and J. Thomas Dunn, Jr., for plaintiff

- appellants. Roberson Haworth & Reese, P.L.L.C., by Alan B. Powell, Christopher C. Finan, and Matthew A. L. Anderson, for defendant

- appellee Mountain Community Bank.

PER CURIAM

.
Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the C ourt are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court ofJ OHN C ONNER C ONSTR ., I NC
. V
. G RANDFATHER H OLDING C O
. Opinion of the Court

- 2

- Appeals. Ac cordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary , 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State , 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010). As to the issue allowed in plai ntiffs ’ p etition for discretionary r eview, we hold that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.