alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A92A0835.

#### CORLEY v. GILLEY.

(423 SE2d 55)

Andrews, Judge.

Plaintiff/appellant Corley and defendant/appellee Gilley were involved in a vehicular accident on October 15, 1988. Corley claimed that she was injured in the collision and on October 10, 1990 filed a lawsuit for damages for personal injuries against Gilley.

The record shows that the Fulton County marshal unsuccessfully attempted to serve Gilley on October 19, 1990 and on December 13, 1990. On December 20, 1990, 71 days after the complaint was filed, and 66 days after the applicable statute of limitation expired, Gilley was served. Gilley filed a motion to dismiss on the basis that the suit *661was barred by the applicable statute of limitation; the trial court granted the motion and Corley appeals.

Decided October 1, 1992.

*Jim White, Fred R. White,*for appellant.

*Harper, Waldon & Craig, Russell D. Waldon, Hilliard V. Castilla,*for appellee.

Corley claims that the trial court erred in granting the motion to dismiss in that there was considerable evidence that she acted in a reasonable and diligent manner to ensure proper service as quickly as possible.

We find no error. “The statute of limitation is tolled by the commencement of a civil action at law. OCGA § 9-11-4 (c) . . . requires that service of a complaint shall be made within five days of the filing of the complaint. If an action is filed within the period of limitation, but not served upon the defendant within five days or within the limitation period, plaintiff must establish that service was made in a reasonable and diligent manner in an attempt to insure that proper service is made as quickly as possible. If reasonable and diligent efforts are not made to insure proper service as quickly as possible, plaintiff is guilty of laches, and in such case, service will not relate back to the time of the filing of the complaint for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitation.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) *Anderson v. Hughes,*196 Ga. App. 186, 187 (1) (395 SE2d 623) (1990).

“The burden is on the plaintiff, not the sheriff, to show diligence in attempting to insure that proper service has been made as quickly as possible. The trial court was authorized to exercise its discretion in determining whether under the facts presented to it the delayed service constituted laches so as to warrant dismissal where the statute of limitation had run before the service was belatedly perfected. Considering the factual posture, we cannot say as a matter of law that the trial court abused its discretion in holding that the plaintiff did not exercise due diligence in attempting to perfect timely service on defendant.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) *Jarmon v. Murphy,*164 Ga. App. 763, 764 (298 SE2d 510) (1982); see also *Watters v. Classon,*193 Ga. App. 493 (1) (388 SE2d 397) (1989).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*
#                                                                         Surface Force Leaders Gather to discuss the future of Surface Warfare at SNA                                                                    

##### by Karli Yeager

15 September 2023

                NAVAL BASE SAN DIEGO (Sep. 14, 2023) - Rear Adm. Yvette M. Davids, Acting Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, right, and retired Vice Adm. Richard Hunt speak at the Surface Navy Association’s (SNA) Waterfront Symposium West Coast 2023. SNA was incorporated as a Non-Profit Association to promote greater coordination and communication to those in the military, business, and academic communities. For those who share a common interest in Surface Warfare while supporting the activities of the United States Surface Forces. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communications Specialist 2nd Class Christopher Thomas)            

                Surface Navy Association Water Front Symposium West Coast 2023            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Petty Officer 2nd Class Christopher Thomas

VIRIN: 230914-N-FD567-1048

https://www.surfpac.navy.mil/

Tags:
**CNSP TOP STORY**SNA 2023**Surface Navy Association Waterfront Symposium
#### In the Matter of David Shalom C. Alan Martin C. Respondent; Menahem C., Appellant.

In an adoption proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Richmond County (D’Arrigo, S.), dated February 19, 1986, which found that the appellant had abandoned his child and that, pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) (a), his consent to the child’s adoption was unnecessary.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and find that there are no meritorious issues. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,848]


Genicom Corporation Currently Known as IER, Inc., Temple, TX; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 18, 2000, applicable 
to workers of Genicom Corporation, Temple, Texas. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on September 12, 2000 (65 FR 55050).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
the Department inadvertently failed to identify the subject firm title 
name in its entirety. The Department is amending the certification 
determination to correctly identify the subject firm title name to read 
``Genicom Corporation, currently known as IER, Inc.''.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,848 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Genicom Corporation, currently known as IER, 
Inc., Temple, Texas who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after June 16, 1999 through August 18, 2002 are 
eligile to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of April, 1999.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-11104 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20616 USDC No. CA-H-92-2191

__________________
JAMES D. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NOLA J. HALL; R.G. BELANGER; A. SCHRAM; T.L. MASSEY; DAVID DOUGHTY; B.J. GOMEZS; A. DYER; ROBERT STUBER; L.L. BREWER; H.L. MOSKOWITZ; BRADLE BACHMAN; UNKNOWN WOODSHOP SUPERVISOR; S. DOUTY; RICHARD JOYNER, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - March 7, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James D. Harris seeks in forma pauperis (IFP) status to appeal the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Harris charges that various defendants (1) negligently dispensed prescription medication; (2) failed to protect him by removing a nurse from the prison pill window when it was learned that she had made an error in dispensing medication; (3) made him wait two days for medical treatment forNo. 95-20616 -2- a swollen wrist; and (4) refused to call a witness at a prison disciplinary hearing in reliance on wrongful information from Harris's counsel substitute. Harris also argues that the district court erred by determining that his counsel substitute did not act under color of state law for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Having reviewed the record and the relevant law, we DENY the motion for IFP because this appeal does not involve legal points arguable on their merits. Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). Thus, the appeal is frivolous and subject to dismissal. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Harris that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Harris is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
#                                                                         USS Arleigh Burke responds to man overboard                                                                    

##### by  U.S. Naval Forces Europe and Africa / U.S. Sixth Fleet Public Affairs

02 August 2022
                The guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) transits the Chesapeake Bay on its way back into port. (U.S. Navy Photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class RJ Stratchko/Released)                            130920-N-NX070-0025                            The guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) transits the Chesapeake Bay on its way back into port. (U.S. Navy Photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class RJ Stratchko/Released)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class RJ StratchkoVIRIN: 130920-N-NX070-0025BALTIC SEA - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) conducted search and rescue efforts for a man overboard while operating in the Baltic Sea, Aug. 1, 2022.

The search and rescue efforts ceased.

The statement will be updated as information becomes available.

Tags:
**USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51)**man overboard**Baltic Sea
#                                                                         Silver Star Awarded to Naval Special Warfare Legend                                                                    

##### by Lt. Zachary Anderson, Naval Special Warfare Command Public Affairs

19 January 2023

                Naval Special Warfare Command Official Logo            

                Naval Special Warfare Command Official Logo            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Naval Special Warfare Command

VIRIN: 221219-N-NO092-1001

*“Today we were fortunate to attend a very long overdue ceremony to recognize one of Naval Special Warfare’s truest warriors, tribal elders and fantastic teammates,” said Naval Special Warfare Force Master Chief (SEAL) Walter S. Dittmar. “His humility was absolutely evident in the fact that he still recognizes and defers to all the brothers who were around him for why he is alive today.”*

Tags:
**NSW**Naval Special Warfare**Silver Star**SEAL**Seal Team 1**Thomas Richards**SECNAV
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD TO JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        91,354,198
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   7,515,900
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             122,379,621
<CASH>                                      15,670,452
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          13,104,951
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         912,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             159,888,546
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            105,368,935
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             34,234,983
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        40,790
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,482,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               159,888,546
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          8,720,639
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   7,789
<BENEFITS>                                   1,718,872
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,602,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,713,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,713,781
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,713,781
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 729 

To help keep students safe on school-run, overnight, off-premises field trips. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2009 

Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To help keep students safe on school-run, overnight, offpremises field trips. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Phylicia’s Law’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

6 Congress finds the following: 

7 (1) Students achieve their full academic poten8 tial when they have the ability to learn in a safe and 

9 secure environment. 

10 (2) Off-campus school trips comprise an inte11 gral part of the educational experience for our NaVerDate Nov 24 2008 07:18 Jan 29, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H729.IH H729

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 729 IH

1 tion’s students. Each year millions of students enjoy 

2 these trips, which provide them with invaluable 

3 learning opportunities outside the classroom. 

4 (3) There exists no Federal law requiring public 

5 schools to develop safety plans for off-premises, 

6 overnight, school-sponsored trips. 

7 SEC. 3. STUDENT SAFETY ON FIELD TRIPS. 

8 Section 4114(d)(7) of the Elementary and Secondary 

9 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7114(d)(7) is amend10 ed— 

11 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

12 the end; 

13 (2) in subparagraph (E), by adding ‘‘and’’ at 

14 the end; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(F) an assurance that— 

17 ‘‘(i) before every off-premises, over18 night field trip, a written safety plan is de19 veloped by the school sponsoring the trip 

20 and provided to the parents of the children 

21 concerned; and 

22 ‘‘(ii) each such safety plan shall in23 clude, at a minimum— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 729 IH

1 ‘‘(I) policies on curfews, room 

2 checks, and chaperone qualifications; 

3 and 

4 ‘‘(II) emergency procedures to be 

5 followed in the case of serious injury 

6 or death;’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          29,380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,499
<INVENTORY>                                     70,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,691
<PP&E>                                         764,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,776,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,565
<BONDS>                                      1,257,434
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       906,283
<OTHER-SE>                                   (550,237)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,776,004
<SALES>                                        532,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               532,287
<CGS>                                          118,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  546,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (115,111)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,036
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (118,147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (721)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,868)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.42)


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 42 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 42 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
# CE2010212EN.01045401.xml

| 5.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 212/454 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 212/454

---

Thursday 7 May 2009MEDIA Mundus: audiovisual cooperation programme with professionals from third countries ***I

P6_TA(2009)0381

European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 May 2009 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an audiovisual cooperation programme with professionals from third countries MEDIA Mundus (COM(2008)0892 – C6-0011/2009 – 2008/0258(COD))

2010/C 212 E/56

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0892),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 150(4) and 157(3)of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0011/2009),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education (A6-0260/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Thursday 7 May 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0258

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 7 May 2009 with a view to the adoption of decision 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an audiovisual cooperation programme with professionals from third countries (MEDIA Mundus)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No 1041/2009/EC.)

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management, Burley Field Office

[ID-077-1220-HQ]


Notice of Closure of Public Land in Twin Falls County, ID

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of closure of public lands in Twin Falls County, Idaho.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that certain lands in Twin Falls 
County, Idaho shall be closed to entry for all uses due to extreme 
environmental hazards. There is an active landslide on the east rim of 
the Salmon Falls Creek Canyon that poses a great threat to the safety 
of the public visiting the area. The area is known as Bluegill Lake or 
Sinking Canyon, and is located 6.5 miles west of Buhl, ID. The legal 
land description of the closure is as follows:

T. 9S., R 13E., Boise Meridian

Section 26: SE\1/4\ NE\1/4\, NE\1/4\ SE\1/4\, SE\1/4\ SE\1/4\.

    Exceptions to this order are granted to the following:
    Law enforcement and emergency services personnel.
    Administratively approved access for actions such as monitoring and 
research studies.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This closure is effective immediately, and shall remain 
effective until rescinded by the Authorized Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theresa Hanley, Burley Field Manager, 
15 East 200 South, Burley, ID 83318. Telephone (208) 677-6641. A map 
showing the public lands that have been closed is available at the BLM 
Burley Field Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority for this closure may be found in 
43 CFR 8364.1. Any person who fails to comply with this closure under 
this subpart may be subject to the penalties provided in 8360.0-7 of 
this title.

    Dated: April 6, 2001.
Theresa M. Hanley,
Burley Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-10915 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
#### ROWELL et al., Appellants, v. JANVRIN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by George P. Row-ell and others against Joseph E. Janvrin.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 23 N. Y. Supp. 481.
Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH     Document 32      Filed 01/15/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH     Document 32      Filed 01/15/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH     Document 32      Filed 01/15/2008     Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-11021 on Form S-3 dated December 22, 1986, in Registration Statement No.
33-28010 on Form S-3 dated April 7, 1989, in Registration Statement No.
33-31747 on Form S-8 dated October 30, 1989, in Registration Statement No.
33-69206 on Form S-8 dated May 18, 1993 of Knight-Ridder, Inc., and in the
related Prospectuses, of our report dated February 1, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Knight-Ridder, Inc.
incorporated by reference and included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1995.





                                                              Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida
March 19, 1996


                                      54