alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 15-2 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 15-2 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 15-2 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 15-2 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 15-2 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD Document 15-2 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 6 of 6
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 686 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 686

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit local public 
            agencies to act as Medicaid enrollment brokers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2009

Mrs. Davis of California (for herself, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Filner, and Mr. 
    Issa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit local public 
            agencies to act as Medicaid enrollment brokers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCIES TO ACT AS MEDICAID 
              ENROLLMENT BROKERS.

    Section 1903(b)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396b(b)(4)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
            ``(C)(i) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall not apply in the 
        case of a local public agency that is acting as an enrollment 
        broker under a contract or memorandum with a State medicaid 
        agency, provided the local public agency does not have a direct 
        or indirect financial interest with any medicaid managed care 
        plan for which it provides enrollment broker services.
            ``(ii) In determining whether a local public agency has a 
        direct or indirect financial interest with a medicaid managed 
        care plan under clause (i), the status of a local public agency 
        as a contractor of the plan does not constitute having a direct 
        or indirect financial interest with the plan.''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-04516-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 16 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 16 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 16 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 16 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 16 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 16 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 16 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 7 of 7
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”), and pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted), Jeffrey A. McCandless, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               This Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”).

2.               The information contained in this Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of theCompany at the end of the period covered by the Report and results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Dated:  February 13, 2004 | /s/ Jeffrey  A. McCandless                     |   |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Jeffrey A. McCandless, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

This certification shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the ExchangeAct, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

----
#### CHRYSTAL SPRINGS LAND AND WATER COMPANY v. LOS ANGELES.

APPEAL FROM' THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 41.

Submitted March 15, 1900.

Decided April 9, 1900.

Decree below affirmed on the authori ,y of the cases named in the opinion of the court.

The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

*Mr. John Garber*for appellants.

*Mr. Walter F. Haas*for appellee. *Mr. S. O. Houghton*was on his brief.

The Chief Justice :

■ Bill to quiet title to certain waters, water rights and works connected therewith. Bill dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and question of jurisdiction certified: Reported below, 82 Fed. Rep. 114; 76 Fed. Rep. 148.

Decree affirmed on authority of (1) *Phillips*v. *Mound City Association,*124 U. S. 605; *California Powder Works*v. *Davis,*151 U. S. 389, 395; *New Orleans*v. *De Armas,*9 Peters, 224; *Borgmeyer*v. *Idler,*159 U. S. 408; *Muse*v. *Arlington Hotel Company,*168 U. S. 430. (2) *Robinson*v. *Anderson,*121 U. S. 522; *Florida Central Railroad v. Bell,*176 U. S. 321; *Gold Washing Company*v. *Keyes,*96 U. S. 199; *Tennessee*v. *Union and Planters' Bank,*152 U. S. 454; *New Orleans*v. *Benjamin,*153 U. S. 411, 424.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

                    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Leadership                           ( print page 2943)                        Initiatives Advisory Panel (Creative Communities Initiative section) to the National Council on the Arts will be held from January 29-31, 2001 in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506.                 

This meeting is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 12, 2000, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. 

Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained from Mr. Michael McLaughlin, Coordinator, Millennium & Leadership Initiatives, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5457. 

Dated: January 9, 2001.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 01-1118 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7537-01-U
do you

thinkabout fire safety?

you should

After a party, check for cigarette butts, especially under cushions 

because chairs and sofas catch on fire fast and burn fast. 

Be aware of how risky it is to smoke when you’ve been drinking or 

are drowsy.

Make sure cigarettes and ashes are out. Never toss hot 

cigarette butts or ashes in the trash can.

Each year, on- and off-campus college and university students 

experience hundreds of fire-related emergencies nationwide.

smoking

cooking

Cook only where it is permitted.

Keep your cooking area clean and uncluttered.

Never leave cooking unattended.

and don t forget

,

Never disable or remove batteries from smoke alarms.

Have an escape plan that includes two ways out, no matter where you are.
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-2 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-2 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral

estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th

Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 13 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MARK ST. CLAIR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NORMAN HODGES, DISTRICT

JUDGE and COUNTY OF LUNA,

N.M.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-2295

(D.C. No. CIV-97-424-MV)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Mark St. Clair appeals from the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his

civil rights complaint for frivolousness pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and for

failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Read liberally, the

pro se complaint alleges that defendants Luna County, N.M. and state district

court judge Norman Hodges conspired to subject plaintiff to a “sham” trial which
- 2 -

resulted in his false imprisonment under an illegal sentence. The complaint seeks

relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the form of actual and punitive damages

and Judge Hodges’ resignation. 

The only fact plaintiff presents in support of his claim is that he was

sentenced to a “term of natural life,” even though the state’s sentencing statute

for capital felonies provides for “life imprisonment, and not a ‘natural-life

sentence.’” Compl. at 2. New Mexico courts, however, have used “life

imprisonment,” “term of . . . natural life” and “rest of natural life”

interchangeably when discussing sentencing statutes. See, e.g. , State v. Lujan ,

412 P.2d 405, 408 (N.M. 1966); Shankle v. Woodruff , 324 P.2d 1017, 1017 (N.M.

1958); State v. Sisneros , 464 P.2d 924, 924-25 (N.M. Ct. App. 1970). Plaintiff

was not illegally sentenced. 

Additionally, we note that Judge Hodges “as a state court judge . . . is

entitled to absolute immunity for his judicial acts.” Schepp v. Fremont County,

Wyo. , 900 F.2d 1448, 1451 (10th Cir. 1990); see Mireles v. Waco , 502 U.S. 9, 12

(1991) (per curiam) (holding that judges are immune from suit for judicial acts

unless those acts are “taken in complete absence of all jurisdiction”); Stump v.

Sparkman , 435 U.S. 349, 362 (1978) (“[W]hether an act by a judge is a ‘judicial’

one relate[s] to the nature of the act itself, i.e., whether it is a function normally

performed by a judge, and to the expectations of the parties, i.e., whether they
- 3 -

dealt with the judge in his judicial capacity.”) In sentencing defendant in

accordance with state statutory authority, Judge Hodges was acting well within

his judicial capacity.

We agree with the district court that plaintiff’s action is frivolous and fails

to state a claim, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), and therefore AFFIRM.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 17-2      Filed 03/25/2008     Page 1 of 1
NO. 07-08-0207-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	SEPTEMBER 22, 2008

	______________________________

	YOHAWNN DANTE BYNES,

				Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

				Appellee

								_________________________________

	FROM THE 31st DISTRICT COURT OF WHEELER COUNTY;

	NO. 4062; HON. STEVEN RAY EMMERT, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Yohawnn Dante Bynes (appellant) appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver.  He filed his notice of appeal on May 15, 2008.  The clerk’s record was filed on June 23, 2008, and the reporter’s record July 15, 2008.  Appellant’s brief was due on August 14, 2008.  No brief or extension was filed by that date with the Court.  On August 22, 2008, a letter was sent to appellant notifying him the brief was overdue and that the brief or response was due on September 2, 2008.  On September 12, 2008, we received a motion to extend the time to file his brief.

	Consequently, since appellant has no attorney and a determination must be made on his indigency and whether he desires an attorney to represent him, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 31st District Court (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

	1.	whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal

	2.       whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel. 

	We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing subjects.  Should the trial court find that appellant desires to pursue the appeal, is indigent and without counsel, we direct the trial court to appoint him same unless appellant knowingly waives his right to counsel.  In either situation, the name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel, if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.  Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the aforementioned hearing.  Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before October 22, 2008.  Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before October 22, 2008.

	It is so ordered.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of advisory committee meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Chemical Warfare Defense will meet in closed session on May 31, 2001, and June 1, 2001, at SAIC, Inc., 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201. The Task Force will assess the possibility of controlling the risk and consequences of a chemical warfare (CW) attack to acceptable national security levels within the next five years.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting, the Task Force will assess current national security and military objectives with respect to CW attacks; CW threats that significantly challenge these objectives today and in the future; the basis elements (R&D, materiel, acquisition, personnel, training, leadership) required to control risk and consequences to acceptable levels, including counter-proliferation; intelligence, warning, disruption; tactical detection and protection (active and passive); consequence management; attribution and deterrence; and policy. The Task Force will also assess the testing and evaluation necessary to demonstrate and maintain the required capability and any significant impediments to accomplishing this goal.

In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. Law No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that this Defense Science Board meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: April 27, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01-11051  Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 25-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01546-AKH Document 25-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          33,136
<SECURITIES>                                    10,220
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,788
<PP&E>                                           2,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                     628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,792
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,904
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,273
<SALES>                                         36,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,713
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  88
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,591
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,489
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
         

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Elder, Felton and Senior Judge Willis 

BELINDA L. ANDERSON 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 1350-05-1 PER CURIAM 

 SEPTEMBER 27, 2005 

VIRGINIA BEACH (CITY OF) SCHOOL BOARD AND 

 COMPMANAGEMENT, INC. 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Sidney H. Kelsey, Jr., on brief), for appellant. 

 (George J. Dancigers; Karen E. Daily; McKenry, Dancigers, 

Dawson & Lake, on brief), for appellees. 

 Belinda L. Anderson (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission finding that she failed to prove total disability after February 11, 2004, as a result of 

her compensable April 9, 2003 injury by accident. Pursuant to Rule 5A:21(b), Virginia Beach 

(City of) School Board raises the additional question of whether the commission erred in finding 

that claimant proved she injured her right elbow in her compensable April 9, 2003 injury by 

accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final 

opinion. See Anderson v. Virginia Beach (City of) School Board, VWC File No. 214-84-67 

(May 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.