alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11124]

[[Page 22258]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Partial Consent Decree in Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Cost Recovery 
Action

    In accordance with the Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a Partial Consent Decree in United States v. American 
Scrap Company, Civil Action No. 1:99-CV-2047, was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on 
April 20, 2001. This Partial Consent Decree resolves the United States' 
claims against Hornell Waste Material Co., Inc., Midlane Salvage Co., 
Inc., Russell I. Young and Barbara Garry (``Settling Defendants'') 
under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), for 
response costs incurred at the Jack's Creek/Sitkin Smelting Superfund 
Site in Mifflin County, Pennsylvania. The Partial Consent Decree 
requires the Settling Defendants to pay a total of $45,000 in past 
resposne costs.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments on the 
proposed Partial Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Please address comments to the Acting 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, 
DC 20044 and refer to United States v. American Scrap Company, DOJ # 
90-11-2-911/1.
    Copies of the proposed Partial Consent Decree may be examined at 
the Office of the United States Attorney, Middle District of 
Pennsylvania, 228 Walnut Street, Harrisburg, PA 17108, and at EPA 
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029. A copy of 
the proposed Partial Consent Decree may be obtained by mail from the 
U.S. Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044-7611. When requesting a copy of the proposed 
Partial Consent Decree, please enclose a check to cover the twenty-five 
cents per page reproduction costs payable to the ``Consent Decree 
Library'' in the amount of $8.50, and reference United States v. 
American Scrap Company, DOJ # 90-11-2-911/1.

Robert Brook,
Assistant Chief, Environmenal Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 01-11124 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Neil  Christiansen,  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




Date:  May  20,  2003               /s/Neil  Christiansen
                                    -------------------------
                                    Neil  Christiansen
                                    Chief  Executive  Officer
                                    Chief  Financial  Officer
#### CLARK, Respondent, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by James H. Clark against the city of Rochester.

No opinion. Motion to strike case from the calendar and for affirmance granted, on default.
#### MARTIN v. BRONSVELD.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

July 2, 1894.)

Record—Amendment of Postea.

A postea need not show the grounds for dismissing a complaint, ana therefore leave will not he granted to amend so as to state the ground on which the complaint was dismissed.

Appeal from special term.

Action by Frank H. Martin against Edward Bronsveld. From an order refusing to amend the postea, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before McADAM and GILDEESLEEVE, JJ.

Geo. A. Black, for appellant.

A. J. Westermayr, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The application below was substantially for a direction to the clerk to amend the postea forming part of the judg ment roll, by stating therein that the complaint was dismissed “on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” The trial judge heard the application, and denied the motion, stating, in an opinion filed by him, that the complaint was not dismissed for insufficiency, but upon the proofs. For this and the further reason that the specific grounds or reasons for the dismissal are not required to appear by the postea, the order appealed from was properly made. There is nothing in the postea declaring that the dismissal was “on the merits,” nor does anything appear by the record which bars another action or in any manner prejudices the plaintiff. It follows that the order must be affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Wachter, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of FIRSTBINGO.COM INC.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 7th day of April, 2004.



| | /s/ Richard Wachter
Richard Wachter
Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------





---
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No . 1 9 -2 3 84

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sak i m a Ib an Sal i h El Bey
ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Pl a in t i

f f - Ap p el l an t

v
. J o h n s o n , Offi cer, W es tM em p h i s Po l i ce Dep art m en t ; M cEl ro y , Offi cer, W es t M em p h i s Po l ice Dep art m en t ; W es tM em p h i s Po l i ce Dep art m en t ; Ark an s as , St at e o f; As a Hu t ch i n so n ; Do es , Co n g res s o f Ark an s as Ho u s e o f Rep res en t at i v es an d Co n g res s o f Ark an s as Sen at e
l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l lDef

en d a n t s - Ap p el l ees

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t edSt at es Di s t ri ctCo u rt fo r t h e Eas t ern Di st ri cto f Ark an s as - J o n es bo ro

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sub m i t t ed : Decem

ber 1 6 , 2 0 19 Fi l ed : Decem

b er 1 9 , 2 0 1 9 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re BENTON, KELLY, an d GRASZ, Ci rcu i tJ u d g es
.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ PER CURIAM

.Sak i m a Ib an Sal i h E l Bay ap p eal s t he d i s t ri ct co u rt ’ s 1 p res erv i ce d i s m i s s al o f

h i s co m p l ai n t s eek i n g d ecl arat o ry , i n ju n ct i v e, an d m o n et ary rel i ef fo l l o w i n g h i s Ark an s as arres tan d sub seq uen t co n vi ct i on s fo r dri v i n g o n a s u s p en d ed l i cen s e an d carel es s an d p ro h ib i t e d d ri v in g. Hav i ng ju ri s di ct i o n u nd er 2 8 U.S.C. § 1 2 9 1 , t h i s
co u rtaffi rm s
.
Th i s co u rt co n cl u d es th at t h e d i s t ri ct co u rt p ro perl y d i s m i s s ed t h e co m p l ai nt b ecau s e Sal i h El Bay ’ s co n v i ct i o n s h av e n ot b een rev ers ed a n d a j u d g m en t i n h i s fav o r wo u l d n eces s ari l y cal l th ei r v al i d i t y i n t o qu es t i on
. See Mo o r e v. Si ms , 2 0 0 F.3 d 1 1 7 0 , 1 1 7 1 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 0 0) (p er cu ri am ) (d e n o v o rev iew o f § 1 9 15 (e)(2 )(B) d i s m i s s al fo r fai l u re t o s tat e a cl ai m ); Heck v. Hu mp h r ey , 5 1 2 U.S. 4 7 7 , 4 8 6 -8 7 (1 9 94 ).

Th e ju d g m en ti s affi rm ed

. S ee 8 th Ci r. R. 4 7B.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

1 Th e Ho n o rab l e D. P. Mars h al l , J r., Ch i ef J u d ge, Un it ed St at es Di s tri ct Co u rt fo r t h e Eas t ern Di s t ri cto f Ark an s as
. -2

-
Exhibit 32
 Written
Statement of Principal  Executive Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) I have been vested by the Board of Directors
of Grubb & Ellis Company with the authority as the Interim Principal Executive Officer of Grubb & Ellis Company for the period
 commencing with the resignation of Gary H. Hunt, the former chief executive officer of Grubb & Ellis Company on November 16, 2009 and ending on November
30, 2009, after which Thomas P. DArcy, shall be sole principal
executive officer of Grubb & Ellis Company;(b)
    
    the Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2008 filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(c)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/  Richard W. PehlkeRichard W. PehlkeInterim Principal Executive Officer
Chief Financial OfficerNovember 20, 2009
#### Randolph H. Post, Appellant, v Katherine L. Post, Respondent.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), each of them having been entered on or about November 21, 1988, March 2, 1989 and March 23, 1989, respectively, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The stay contained in this court’s order entered on May 16, 1989 is hereby vacated. No opinion. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DIANA PAPPAS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of

MINA PAPPAS, Deceased

, Appellant /Cross

- Appellee

,

v.

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY a foreign corporation, LIGGETT GROUP, LL C, a foreign corporation

, f/k/a LIGGETT GROUP, INC., f/k/a LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY and VECTOR GROUP LTD, INC.
, f/k/a BROOKE GROUP, LTD,

a foreign corporation

, Appellee s /Cross

- Appellants

.

No. 4D 13

- 4600

[ August 19, 2015 ]

Appeal and cross

- appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jack B. Tuter , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. CACE07022785 and CACE08080000

.

Steven M. Willner of Law Office of Steven M. Willner

, P.A., Davie, for appellant /cross

- appellee

.

Eric L. Lund t and Gordon James, III of Sedgwick LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Gregory G. Katsas of Jones Day, Washington, DC, and Jason T. Burnette, Atlanta, Georgia, for appellee s /cross

- appellant s , R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

.

Karen H. Curtis of Clarke Silverglate , P.A., Miami, and Kelly Anne Luther of Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, Miami, for appellee s /cross

- appellant s , Liggett Group LLC and Vector Group LTD.

P ER C URIAM

.

This case is controlled by Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

, 145 So.
3d 183 ( Fla

. 4 th DCA 2014), decided after the trial court’s ruling. The t rial

court erred by not allowing the personal representative to amend the complaint and in dismissing the action on statute of limitation grounds.2

Reversed

.

G ROSS and D AMOORGIAN
, JJ

., and H ERSCH
, R ICHARD
, Associate Judge,

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 813 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 813

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
   Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 306 
East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 813

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
   Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6381 

To clarify the application of certain Federal laws relating to elections to 

American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 

Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, and Mr. PIERLUISI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and 

in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To clarify the application of certain Federal laws relating 

to elections to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of 

the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the United 

States Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6381 IH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF APPLICATION OF FEDERAL 

2 ELECTION LAWS TO CERTAIN JURISDIC3 TIONS. 

4 (a) FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACT OF 1971.— 

5 Section 301(12) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

6 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(12)) is amended by striking ‘‘or a 

7 territory or possession of the United States’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 

9 Mariana Islands, Guam, or the United States Virgin Is10 lands’’. 

11 (b) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.— 

12 (1) INTIMIDATION OF VOTERS.—Section 594 of 

13 title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 

14 ‘‘Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resi15 dent Commissioner,’’ and inserting ‘‘or Delegate or 

16 Resident Commissioner to the Congress’’. 

17 (2) INTERFERENCE BY GOVERNMENT EMPLOY18 EES.—Section 595 of title 18, United States Code, 

19 is amended by striking ‘‘Delegate from the District 

20 of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner,’’ and insert21 ing ‘‘or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the 

22 Congress’’. 

23 (3) VOTING BY ALIENS.—Section 611(a) of title 

24 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 

25 ‘‘Delegate from the District of Columbia, or ResiVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:19 Oct 14, 2010 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6381.IH H6381

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6381 IH

1 dent Commissioner,’’ and inserting ‘‘or Delegate or 

2 Resident Commissioner to the Congress’’. 

3 (c) VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965.—Section 11 of the 

4 Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973i) is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘Delegate from the District of Columbia, 

6 Guam, or the Virgin Islands, or Resident Commissioner 

7 of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’’ each place it ap8 pears in subsections (c) and (e)(2) and inserting ‘‘or Dele9 gate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela Fredette, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Pamela Fredette                            
|Pamela Fredette                                
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                               
|November 9, 2007                               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to enherent Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
September %Tots'

\XXArTtf C.rtt"<**/ j\0f&IS

p.o. L* mot

/Wr*, Txi2l\\

ft[e*4t Ucd</,ze4'ii^f>y cvldr&S Us c^^eA. My ^^ ^Jdr^s fe listed lael^

TDcr- sh.cso. u^r RECEIVED IN

1S25 FM 1U QOURTOFCRiMIWAUPpefLS

Cuir*,TxT7Wi SIP 10 2015
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10734]

[[Page 21750]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. MG01-12-001]

Alliance Pipeline L.P.; Notice of Filing

April 25, 2001.
    Alliance Pipeline L.P. filed revised standards of conduct on April 
11, 2001 in accordance with the Commission's March 15, 2001 Order. 94 
FERC para. 61,277 (2001).
    Alliance Pipeline states that it served copies of the filing on all 
parties in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest in this proceeding with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 
385.214). All such motions to intervene or protest should be filed on 
or before May 10, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of these filings 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10734 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Louis McCleese, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.), rendered January 9, 1986, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him as a second felony offender.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that, viewing the evidence presented at the trial in the light most favorable to the defendant, no reasonable view of such evidence would support a defense of entrapment. *853Thus, the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s request to charge the jury with respect to this defense *(see, e.g., People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299, 301; *People v Ruiz,*96 AD2d 845; *contra, People v Moore,*62 AD2d 930; *People v Sundholm,*58 AD2d 224).

There is no merit to the defendant’s claim that the sentence imposed was so disproportionate to the offenses as to constitute unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. The sentencing court properly sentenced the defendant as a second felony offender to the minimum mandatory sentence required by New York State’s statutory sentencing scheme *(see,*Penal Law § 70.06).

We have reviewed the defendant’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Weinstein, Hooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.