alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 774 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 774

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 46-02 21st Street in Long Island City, New York, as the ``Geraldine 
                    Ferraro Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GERALDINE FERRARO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 46-02 21st Street in Long Island City, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Geraldine Ferraro Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Geraldine 
Ferraro Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 5, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 774

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 46-02 21st Street in Long Island City, New York, as the ``Geraldine 
                    Ferraro Post Office Building''.
```
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-13-2008

USA v. Aguirre

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-1377

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Aguirre" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1610.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1610
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT 

OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

NO. 05-1377

 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CARLOS AGUIRRE

 Appellant

 

On Appeal From the United States 

District Court

For the District of New Jersey 

(D.C. Crim. Action No. 04-cr-00496)

District Judge: Hon. Dickinson R. Debevoise

 

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

February 12, 2008

BEFORE: SLOVITER, SMITH and 

STAPLETON, Circuit Judges

(Filed: February 13, 2008 )

 
2

 

OPINION OF THE COURT

 

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Carlos Aguirre pled guilty to using a telephone to facilitate a conspiracy

to distribute cocaine. He was sentenced to 48 months of incarceration. He now appeals

that sentence, arguing (1) that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during the

sentencing phase of his case in the District Court, (2) that the District Court erred in

declining to grant a departure from the Guideline range because of extraordinary family

circumstances, and (3) that the District Court also erred in failing to grant a departure on

the ground that his offense constituted aberrant behavior.

Aguirre’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim was not raised in the District

Court and, as a result, the record was not developed on the issues raised by that claim. In

such situations, we decline to review ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct

appeal and insist that they be addressed initially in the trial court in a collateral review

proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, see, e.g., United States v. Haywood, 155 F.3d 674,

678 (3d Cir. 1995).

We lack jurisdiction “to review discretionary decisions [of a sentencing court] to

deny departures, unless for allegations of legal error.” United States v. Cooper, 437 F.3d

324, 332 (3d Cir. 2006).
3

For the foregoing reasons, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court

without prejudice to Aguirre pursuing his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a

proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

# AGENCY:

General Services Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Agriculture and the Department of Interior has cancelled the following Optional Form because of low usage: OF 289, Property Loss or Damage Report—Fire Suppression.

# DATES:

                        Effective upon publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Barbara Williams, General Services Administration, (202) 501-0581.

Dated: January 2, 2001.

Barbara M. Williams,

Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-1104  Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


             CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-48022, No. 33-52700, No. 33-80172, No. 33-71080, No. 33-80170, No. 333-03125,
No. 333-31027, and No. 333-10442 of Metatec International, Inc. on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-03123 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 1,
2002, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Metatec International, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the financial statement schedule of Metatec International, Inc.,
listed in Item 14. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.




/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
March 25, 2002
Columbus, Ohio









                                       52
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 838 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 838

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 1, 2009

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the conveyance of a parcel of land held by the Bureau of 
Prisons of the Department of Justice in Miami Dade County, Florida, to 
facilitate the construction of a new educational facility that includes 
    a secure parking area for the Bureau of Prisons, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Miami Dade College Land Conveyance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF BUREAU OF PRISONS LAND TO MIAMI DADE COUNTY, 
              FLORIDA.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--The Attorney General shall convey to 
Miami Dade College of Miami Dade County, Florida (in this section 
referred to as the ``College''), all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to a parcel of land held by the Bureau of Prisons 
of the Department of Justice in Miami Dade County, Florida, consisting 
of a parking lot approximately 47,500 square feet and located at 35 NE 
2 Street, for the purpose of permitting the College to use the parcel 
as a site for a new educational building that includes a parking area, 
of which not less than 118 secure parking spaces shall be designated 
for use by the Bureau of Prisons of the Department of Justice.
    (b) Reversionary Interest.--If the Attorney General determines at 
any time that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not 
being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified 
in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
property shall revert, at the option of the Attorney General, to the 
United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate 
entry onto the property. Any determination of the Attorney General 
under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity 
for a hearing.
    (c) Survey.--If the Attorney General considers it necessary, the 
Attorney General may have the exact acreage or square footage and legal 
description of the land to be conveyed under subsection (a) determined 
by a survey satisfactory to the Attorney General. The College shall 
bear the cost of the survey.
    (d) Exemption.--Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) shall not apply to the 
conveyance of land under subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives March 31, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Allen *vs.*Napier *et*al., executors.

The owner of certain land died, and subsequently his executors brought ejectment against the tenant in possession. The defendant relied upon a bond for titles made to him by the executors as individuals, with seven years’ possession thereunder. Plaintiffs showed that the purchase money had not been paid, and that the person in possession had demanded that the executors, as such, should rent him the land and acknowledged that the title was in the estate:

*Held,*that a recovery by the plaintiffs was proper. Possession, to be adverse, must be in the right of the possessor seeking to prescribe thereunder, and not in the right of another.

December 1, 1885.

Prescription. Possession. Bond for Titles. Before Judge Simmons. Bibb Superior Court. April Term, 1885.

*276Reported in the decision.

R. W. Stubbs; J. H. Toole; W. H. Wylly, for plaintiff in error.

H. F. Strohecker ; W. Dessau, for defendants.

Blandeord-, Justice.

‘ •The.defendants in error, as executors of Leroy Napier, deceased, brought their action in the statutory form to recover a tract of land in Bibb county, against the plaintiff in error. They exhibited a grant from the state to their testator, Leroy Napier, the will of their testator, duly proved, and letters testamentary issued by the ordinary to them as such executors of said will, and closed. The defendant relied upon two bonds for title, each made by the executors individually in their names and not as executors, and claimed possession for more than seven years prior to the commencement of this action, and closed. The executors proved that the purchase money had not been paid, and showed that Allen had demanded that the executors should rent him the land as such executors and acknowledged the title to be in Lero'y Napier’s estate, which was in writing. Under these facts, the court held that the executors were entitled to recover, and that the prescriptive title in Allen was not good. Allen excepted to this, and brings the case here for review.

The possession of Allen is not adverse, as his possession is not in his own right, but is in the right of another, as made manifest by the bond for titles under which he obtained and claims possession of this land, and not having paid the purchase money, he can only claim title by the bond. It is declared in §2670 of the Code that possession, to be the foundation of a prescription, must be in the right of the possessor and not of another. See also 24 *Ga.,*466; 67 *Id.,*606.

*277We think that these authorities control this case, and that the ruling of the court below was right.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         442,747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,541,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,188,590
<PP&E>                                         638,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,780,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,717,708
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,503,062
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,433
<OTHER-SE>                                     644,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,780,682
<SALES>                                      4,909,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,909,040
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,777,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               957,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                220,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                    84,943
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            135,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   135,259
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
NY412414.1/9999-00999

H. Rowan Gaither IV (HG-2245)

Reema S. Abdelhamid (RA-0085)

RICHARDS KIBBE & ORBE LLP

One World Financial Center

New York, New York 10281

Telephone: (212) 530-1800

Facsimile: (212) 530-1801

Counsel for Defendant Table Moose Media, LLC

d/b/a/ Indy Menís Magazine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

GEORGE EDWARD McCAIN, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RAHAL LETTERMAN RACING, LLC, an Ohio

limited liability co. et al.

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

Index No.: 07-CV-5729

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Nora Capek, certify:

1. That I am over the age of eighteen years, and am not a party to this action.

2. That on July 27, 2007, I caused to be served a copy of the foregoing Notice of

Joinder in Motion to Transfer Case, through the Courtís electronic notification system to all

registered counsel and by U.S. mail, postage pre-paid, in a sealed envelope addressed to the

following as indicated below:

Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 17-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - NY412414.1/9999-00999

John Anthony Pelosi

Pelosi, Wolf, Effron & Spates, LLP

Woolworth Building

233 Broadway, 22nd Flr

New York, NY 10279

(212) 334-3599

(212) 571-9149 (fax)

jpelosi@pwes.com

Counsel to Plaintiff George Edward

McCain

H. Ritchey Hollenbaugh

Carlile Patchen and Murphy, LLP

366 East Broad Street

Columbus, OH 43215

(614) 228-6135

(614) 221-0216 (fax)

David J. Pasternak

John W. Patton, Jr. Pasternak, Pasternak and Patton

1875 Century Park East, Suite

Suite 2200

Los Angeles, CA 90067

(310) 553-1500

(310) 553-1540 (fax)

Counsel to Defendants Bobby Rahal

Automotive Group and Rahal Letterman

Racing, LLC

Carl E. Person

Carl E. Person - An Individual Practitioner

325 W. 45th St. - Suite 201

New York, NY 10036

(212) 307-4444

(212) 307-0247 (fax)

carlpers@ix.netcom.com

Counsel to Defendant Ellen Emerson

Dated: New York, New York

July 27, 2007

/s/ Nora Capek

Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 17-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements pertaining to the IMCO Recycling Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-34745), the IMCO Recycling Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 Nos. 333-76780, 333-00075, and 333-71339), the IMCO Recycling Inc.Annual Incentive Program (Form S-8 Nos. 333-07091 and 333-71335), the IMCO Recycling Inc. Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-81949), and the IMCO Recycling Inc. 2000 Restricted Stock Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-55962) of our report dated January 28,2003, with respect to the financial statements of IMCO Recycling Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

 

March 19, 2003 

Dallas, TX
# FY2020 APPROPRIATIONS REPORTINGREQUIREMENT REFUGEE DATA –FY2016 TO FY2019

*The Committee is concerned about the slow pace of refugee admissions experienced since fiscal year 2017. The Committee directs the Department to submit to the Committee and make available to the public on its website not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this act the following information for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2019: the number of USCIS staff assigned to the Refugee Corps at the Refugee Affairs Division of USCIS; the number of refugee processing circuit rides conducted; the number of USCIS Refugee Corps officers assigned to each circuit ride; the destination region and country for each circuit ride; the number of refugee interviews conducted by USCIS; and the number of approvals and denials issued by USCIS.*

The destination region and country for each circuit ride, which includes the number of refugee officers on each circuit ride, can be found at Refugee Processing Circuit Rides.

1These numbers represent the total authorized staffing level assigned to the Refugee Corps each fiscal year.

2These numbers reflect refugee processing trips completed by the Refugee Affairs Division and International Operations.

3These refugee processing trips were completed by both the Refugee Affairs Division and International Operations. The teams, in some instances, included officers from other USCIS offices who were temporarily detailed to the Refugee Affairs Division to assist with refugee processing.

4Data was extracted from the Worldwide Refugee Admissions Processing System (WRAPS) on Feb. 20, 2020. These numbers represent individuals interviewed for refugee status during refugee processing circuit rides and in international USCIS field offices.

5Data was extracted from WRAPS on Feb. 20, 2020. The processing of a refugee case can span across fiscal years. Therefore, USCIS may interview refugees in a particular fiscal year whose cases are not necessarily approved or denied that same fiscal year.

06/29/2021

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Nationwide Life Insurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Timothy G. Frommeyer, Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 1, 2006



|                                                       |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Timothy G. Frommeyer                              
|Name: Timothy G. Frommeyer                            
|Title: Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nationwide Life Insurance Company and will be retained by Nationwide Life Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 7:07-cv-05740-SCR     Document 3      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. George A. Franco, Petitioner, v Andrew Phoenix, Respondent.

Application for a writ of habeas corpus, transferred to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for hearing and determination. No opinion. Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.