alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, David I. Vickers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Ceres Group, Inc., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ceres Group, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting.

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2004

By: /s/ David I. Vickers
------------------------------------------------------------
David I. Vickers
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted Kozub, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\                Ted KozubTed KozubPresident

May 20, 2003

----
HYNES & HOWES INSURANCE COUNSELORS, INC.
                    Statement of Retained Earnings (Deficit)
              For the Years Ended September 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995


                                              Year Ended September 30,
                                        1997            1996            1995

Balance at Beginning of Year    $ (3,082,995)   $ (3,098,392)   $ (3,091,877)

Income (Loss) for the Year            (4,385)         15,397          (6,515)

Balance at End of Year          $ (3,087,380)   $ (3,082,995)   $ (3,098,392)


                          Statement of Paid-In Capital
              For the Years Ended September 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995

Balance at Beginning
  and End of Year               $        100    $        100    $        100



Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
**32.2           Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

	In connection with the Annual Report of Shallbetter Industries, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chow Chung Pang, Director of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

By: /S/ CHOW CHUNG PANG 	Chow Chung Pang, Director

	Date: January 13, 2004
EXHIBIT 3.2


     Section 5 of the Company's Articles of Incorporation shall be 
amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


           5.  The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall 
have authority to issue is Fifty Million Nine Hundred Sixty-Six 
Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Six (50,966,856) shares $.20 par value 
capital stock with a total par value of Ten Million One Hundred 
Ninety-Three Thousand Three Hundred Seventy-One Dollars 
($10,193,371).  The Board of Directors is hereby authorized to 
issue, from time to time, in whole or in part, such shares, with 
such full, limited, multiple or fractional or non-voting rights and 
with such designations, preferences, qualifications, privileges, 
limitations, options, conversion rights and other special rights as 
may be adopted by the Board of Directors in the resolution provided 
for the issue of such shares.
EX-4.8





 Exhibit 4.8 

2019 AMENDMENT TO THE 

TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION 

2012 INCENTIVE PLAN 

WHEREAS, BB&T Corporation, predecessor to Truist Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”), sponsors the BB&T
Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan for the benefit of certain of its employees and their beneficiaries (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to reflect (i) the corporate merger of SunTrust Banks, Inc. into the
Corporation pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between SunTrust Banks, Inc. and BB&T Corporation dated February 7, 2019 (the “Agreement”), and (ii) the name change of the plan sponsor to Truist Financial
Corporation, effective as of Closing Date as defined in the Agreement (the “Closing Date”); 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is
hereby amended, effective as of the Closing Date (unless otherwise noted below), as follows: 
 1.    Section 1.1 of the
Plan is amended to add the following sentence to the end thereof, to read as follows: 
 Effective as of the Closing Date, as defined in the
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between SunTrust Banks, Inc. and BB&T Corporation dated February 7, 2019 (the “Closing Date”), SunTrust Banks, Inc. will merge with and into the Company, and the Company shall become the Truist
Financial Corporation. 
 2.    Section 15.7 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentence to the end thereof, to
read as follows: 
 On or after the Closing Date, all references in the Plan to “BB&T” shall instead refer to “TFC,”
meaning Truist Financial Corporation, a North Carolina corporation with its principal office at Charlotte, North Carolina, or any successor thereto by merger, consolidation, or otherwise. 

3.    Section 15.38 of the Plan is amended in its entirety, to read as follows: 

Plan means this Truist Financial Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan, as it may be hereafter amended and/or restated. 












 Executed on this 6th day of November, 2019. 

BB&T Corporation 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher L. Henson

		 	Title: President and Chief Operating Officer


  
 2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6102 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

to extend the authority of the Secretary of the Navy to enter into 

multiyear contracts for F/A–18E, F/A–18F, and EA–18G aircraft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 10, 2010 

Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Mr. AKIN, and Mr. MARSHALL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 to extend the authority of the Secretary of 

the Navy to enter into multiyear contracts for F/A– 

18E, F/A–18F, and EA–18G aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR F/ 

4 A–18E, F/A–18F, AND EA–18G AIRCRAFT. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF CERTIFICATION.—Paragraph (2) 

6 of section 128(a) of the National Defense Authorization 

7 Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6102 IH

1 2217) is amended by striking ‘‘a reference to March’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘a reference to September’’. 

3 (b) REQUIRED AUTHORITY.—Such section 128 is 

4 further amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(e) REQUIRED AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any 

6 other provision of law, with respect to a multiyear contract 

7 entered into under subsection (a), this section shall be 

8 deemed to meet the requirements under subsection (i)(3) 

9 and (l)(3) of section 2306b of title 10, United States 

10 Code.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Mary Stevenot, Now Known as Mary A. Alpert, Appellant, v Robert Stevenot, Respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment entered December 3, 1982, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Yachnin, J.), dated September 8, 1986, as, after a hearing, granted the defendant husband’s motion for a direction that the appellant raise the two infant issue of the marriage in the religious faith of the Congregational Church.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The dispute herein concerns the alleged breach by the custodial parent of an oral contract assertedly made before and reiterated during the marital relationship to raise the infant issue in the Congregational Church.

The record reveals that no writing evidences this asserted agreement and that no mention of the children’s religious upbringing is set forth in the judgment of divorce, or a later judgment dated January 4, 1985, dealing with permanent custody. Although the appellant denies ever having made such an agreement, the hearing court found that such an oral agreement existed. This, however, does not resolve the dispute.

Absent agreement, the court will not interfere with the religious upbringing of children *(People ex rel. Sisson v Sisson,*271 NY 285; *People ex rel. Portnoy v Strasser,*303 NY 539). An oral agreement entered into prior to and during the marital relationship is not binding upon the custodial parent following judicial dissolution of the marriage if its terms have not been reduced to a writing or included in a stipulation of settlement, divorce judgment, or custody determination *(see, Schwarzman v Schwarzman,*88 Misc 2d 866). Agreements between divorcing spouses with respect to the upbringing of the issue will be upheld by the courts when incorporated into separation agreements, court orders or signed stipulations *(see, Gluckstern v Gluckstern,*4 NY2d 521; *Garvar v Faltings,*54 AD2d 971; *Spring v Glawon,*89 AD2d 980). In this case, the oral agree*821ment entered into prior to and reiterated during the marriage did not contemplate a postdivorce status and is, therefore, not binding on the parties *(Schwarzman v Schwarzman, supra).*Since no such agreement exists, the custodial parent is the proper party to determine the children’s religious training *(see, People ex rel. Sisson v Sisson, supra; Matter of Paolella v Phillips,*27 Misc 2d 763). Mollen, P. J., Eiber, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
# Documenting Incidents When the Time Changes

**Posted: Dec. 17, 2020**

            -   Find similar NFIRSGrams:
            - Basic Module
            - Coding

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

This NFIRSGram explains how to document times for incidents that occur during a change to, or a change from, daylight saving time.

When the time changes from daylight saving time to standard time, and vice versa, a common question asked is, “How do I document times for incidents that occur during the time change?”

For instance, your department’s alarm time is **00:57:45**, and you arrive on scene at **01:05:22**. You are on the scene of the incident for approximately 56 minutes, and your last unit clears the scene at **02:01:11**.

###  Fall

If you document the clear time as **01:01:11** after setting the time back an hour, you will receive a critical error message that the clear time is prior to the arrival time.

###  Spring

If you document the clear time as **03:01:11** after setting the time forward an hour, you indicate that you were on the scene an hour longer than you were.

The best course of action is to document any incident that occurs during the time change as if the time change did not occur.

## Important points

              -   Time change only affects a small percentage of the incidents nationwide.
              -   Report the times as if the time did not change.
              -   Include in Remarks the actual clock times and that the incident occurred during the time change.
              -   Apply this rule if your department responds to incidents in another time zone.

For more information about NFIRS, please contact the NFIRS Support Center: Monday – Friday between 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. ET, at 888-382-3827 or by email at fema-nfirshelp@fema.dhs.gov.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. KELLY, Appellant v. EXAMINING BOARD OF PLUMBERS, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

April *114813, 1894.)

Proceeding on the relation of Thomas J. Kelly against the examining board of plumbers, etc. !R. Foster, for appellant. T. Farley, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RAIT Financial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel G. Cohen                
|Daniel G. Cohen                    
|Chief Executive Officer and Trustee
|Date: November 9, 2007
# L_2013123EN.01S00301.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 123/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 123/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
#### Oscar Ernesto AMAYA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-73314.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

Vivian N. Szawarc, Attorney at Law, Theodore A. Behlendorf, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mona Maria Yousif, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Ernesto Amaya, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdic*691tion under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims, *Khan v. Holder,*584 F.3d 773, 776 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny the petition for review.

Amaya does not challenge the agency’s determination that he is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) based on his 1993 conviction for lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14 years of age in violation of California Penal Code § 288(a).

The agency determined that Amaya is ineligible for relief under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996), because his ground of removability lacks a statutory counterpart in a ground of inadmissibility. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5). Amaya’s legal and constitutional challenges to this determination are foreclosed by *Abebe v. Mukasey,*554 F.3d 1203, 1207 & 1208 n. 7 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Cusani, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered October 13, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Appellate review of the court’s denial of certain discovery requests was forfeited by the defendant’s plea of guilty *(see, People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1, 5-6; *People v Thomas,*74 AD2d 317, 319-320, *affd*53 NY2d 338; *People v Manzo, 99*AD2d 817; *People v Corti,*88 AD2d 345, 348). The court’s denial of the requests did not affect its jurisdiction over the action and did not impinge on rights of constitutional dimensions *(see, People v Taylor, supra,*at 6). In any event, the court properly declined to direct the prosecutor to provide *Rosario*material approximately two months before the scheduled trial date *(see,*CPL 240.45) and properly denied the discovery requests which sought evidentiary material *(see,*CPL 200.95; *People v Davis,*41 NY2d 678, 679-680; *People v Dziedzic,*140 AD2d 737; *People v Smith,*103 AD2d 859; *People v Raymond G.,*54 AD2d 596). Rubin, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arunava De, VP of Financial of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Arunava De             
|Arunava De                 
|Principal Financial Officer
|August 11, 2009            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent, Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Grubb & EllisCompany (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge, on the date hereof:(a) the Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007 filed on the date hereof withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Mark E. Rose         Mark E. Rose    Chief Executive Officer    August 30, 2007         /s/ Richard W. Pehlke         Richard W. Pehlke    Chief Financial Officer    August 30, 2007