alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF AXSYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             69 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,384 
<ALLOWANCES>                                      507 
<INVENTORY>                                    27,028 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46,812 
<PP&E>                                         26,611 
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,531 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 76,211 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,096 
<BONDS>                                         5,612 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                           41 
<OTHER-SE>                                     52,087 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   76,211 
<SALES>                                       116,581   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              116,581   
<CGS>                                          81,238   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  81,238   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               24,514   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  309   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                932   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,588   
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,063   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             8,525   
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,426)   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0   
<CHANGES>                                           0   
<NET-INCOME>                                    6,099   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.46<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.45<F1>

<FN>
<F1>Earnings per share has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 128. Basic
and diluted EPS have been entered in place of primary and fully diluted,
respectively.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Equity OfficeProperties Trust, the general partner of EOP Operating Limited Partnership (the “Company”), eachhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his / her knowledge, on the date hereof:
(a)  the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, filed on thedate hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and (b)  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: May 10, 2005   /s/ Richard D. Kincaid       Richard D. Kincaid   *President and Chief Executive Officer*   *of Equity Office Properties Trust, the general*   *partner of EOP Operating Limited Partnership*     Date: May 10, 2005   /s/ Marsha C. Williams       Marsha C. Williams   *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*   *of Equity Office Properties Trust, the general*   *partner of EOP Operating Limited Partnership*
# CE2010285EN.01008401.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 285/84 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 285/84

---

Tuesday 24 November 2009Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Tobias Pflüger

P7_TA(2009)0082

European Parliament decision of 24 November 2009 on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Tobias Pflüger (2009/2055(IMM))

2010/C 285 E/15

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the request by Tobias Pflüger for defence of his immunity announced in plenary sitting on 5 May 2009,

having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,

1

having regard to Article 46 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany,

having regard to its decision of 16 May 2006 on the request for waiver of the immunity of Tobias Pflüger (2),

2

having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0054/2009),

| A. | whereas Parliament has already waived Tobias Pflüger's immunity by its decision of 16 May 2006 concerning the same set of facts, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament has already waived Tobias Pflüger's immunity by its decision of 16 May 2006 concerning the same set of facts,

| B. | whereas it appears after examination that Parliament's prerogatives are threatened neither by the judgment against Tobias Pflüger of 2 March 2009 nor by the request of the public prosecutor on 15 April 2009 to increase the penalty imposed on him, |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas it appears after examination that Parliament's prerogatives are threatened neither by the judgment against Tobias Pflüger of 2 March 2009 nor by the request of the public prosecutor on 15 April 2009 to increase the penalty imposed on him,

| 1. | Decides not to defend the immunity and privileges of Tobias Pflüger; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides not to defend the immunity and privileges of Tobias Pflüger;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of the committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authority of the Federal Republic of Germany. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of the committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authority of the Federal Republic of Germany.

---

(1)  Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391.

1

Wagner

Fohrmann and Krier

Wybot

Faure and others

(2)  OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p. 74.

2

---
Exhibit 32
 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas P. DArcyThomas P. DArcyChief Executive Officer March 16, 2010/s/ Richard W. PehlkeRichard W. Pehlke Chief
Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2010
**Exhibit 21****Subsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Company**     Subsidiaries State of Incorporation1. Aequus Property Management Company Texas2. Grubb & Ellis Affiliates, Inc. Delaware3. Grubb & Ellis of Arizona, Inc. Washington4. Grubb & Ellis Asset Services Company Delaware5. Grubb & Ellis Europe, Inc. California6. Grubb & Ellis Institutional Properties, Inc. California7. Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. Delaware  *Subsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc.:*    a. Grubb & Ellis Management Services of Michigan, Michigan      Inc. (“GEMS of Michigan”)    b. Grubb & Ellis Management Services of Canada, Inc. Canada  c. GEMS Mexicana, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. (98% owned Mexico     by GEMS, 2% owned by GEMS of Michigan, Inc.)    d. Grubb & Ellis Management Services of Brazil LTDA Brazil     (98% owned by GEMS, 2% owned by GEMS ofMichigan, Inc.)    e. GEMS of Sweden, AB Sweden  f. GEMS Korea, LLC Korea  g. Crane Realty & Management Co. California     *Subsidiaries of Crane Realty & Management Co.:*        1. Crane Realty Services, Inc. California  h. Middle East Real Estate Services, LLC Delaware8. Grubb & Ellis Mortgage Group, Inc. California9. Grubb & Ellis Mortgage Services, Inc. California10. Grubb & Ellis New York, Inc. New York11. Grubb & Ellis of Michigan, Inc. Michigan12. Grubb & Ellis of Nevada, Inc. Nevada13. Grubb & Ellis Advisers of California, Inc. California14. Grubb & Ellis Consulting Services Company Florida  *Subsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Consulting Services Company:*    a. Landauer Hospitality International, Inc. Delaware  b. Landauer Securities, Inc. Massachusetts15. Grubb & Ellis Southeast Partners, Inc. California16. HSM Inc.: Texas17. Montclair Insurance Company, Ltd. Bermuda18. White Commercial Real Estate California19. Wm. A. White/Grubb & Ellis, Inc. New York
#### MURPHY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK, L. E. & W. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by George C. Murphy against the New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company.

No opinion. Order appealed from affirmed, on the opinion of this court in same case. 62 Hun, 587, 17 N. Y. Supp. 302.
- Home

# Copyright

Except as otherwise noted in this website, all of the content of the website constitutes a work of the Federal government under sections 105 and 403 of title 17 of the U.S. Code.

If you have any questions about the use or attribution of any content on this website, please contact our Washington DC, Office.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DIANA PAPPAS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of

MINA PAPPAS, Deceased,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY a foreign corporation,

LIGGETT GROUP, LLC, a foreign corporation,

f/k/a LIGGETT GROUP, INC.,

f/k/a LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY and

VECTOR GROUP LTD, INC., f/k/a BROOKE GROUP, LTD,

a foreign corporation,

Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

No. 4D13-4600

[August 19, 2015]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jack B. Tuter, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

CACE07022785 and CACE08080000.

Steven M. Willner of Law Office of Steven M. Willner, P.A., Davie, for 

appellant/cross-appellee.

Eric L. Lundt and Gordon James, III of Sedgwick LLP, Fort Lauderdale, 

and Gregory G. Katsas of Jones Day, Washington, DC, and Jason T. 

Burnette, Atlanta, Georgia, for appellees/cross-appellants, R.J. Reynolds 

Tobacco Company.

Karen H. Curtis of Clarke Silverglate, P.A., Miami, and Kelly Anne 

Luther of Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, Miami, for 

appellees/cross-appellants, Liggett Group LLC and Vector Group LTD.

PER CURIAM. 

This case is controlled by Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 145 So.

3d 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014), decided after the trial court’s ruling. The trial 

court erred by not allowing the personal representative to amend the 

complaint and in dismissing the action on statute of limitation grounds.
2

Reversed.

GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., and HERSCH, RICHARD, Associate Judge, 

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: JAVIER FLORES, JR.,

Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-09-00302-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, Javier Flores, Jr., seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the El Paso County

Sheriff “to immediate [sic] release the relator for [sic] custody with sufficient authority by the

issuance of said mandate.”

This Court does not have the authority to issue a writ of mandamus the Respondent in

this case. See TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b)(Vernon 2004). Therefore, mandamus relief is

denied. We therefore deny Relator’s request.

January 20, 2010

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 3 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 4 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 5 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 6 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 7 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 8 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 9 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 10 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 11 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 12 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 13 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 14 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 15 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 16 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 17 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 18 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 19 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 20 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 21 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 22 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 23 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 24 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 25 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 26 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 27 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 28 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 14 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 29 of 29
#### MANNING et al., Respondents, v. BECK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

March 27, 1894.)

Action by George G. Manning and others against Lewis P. Beck and others.

Argued before DWIGHT, P. J., and LEWIS, HAIGHT, and BRADLEY, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.
#                                                 FLTCM. JOHN PERRYMAN                                                                                            

#### FLEET MASTER CHIEF, U.S. Fleet Forces Command

24 April 2024

                FLTCM John Perryman            

                FLTCM John Perryman            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: FLTCM John Perryman

VIRIN: 240111-N-EC658-9999

Fleet Master Chief Perryman, a native of San Antonio, Texas, serves as the senior enlisted advisor for Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, which consists of more than 100,000 active duty and reserve personnel who serve on more than 120 ships and submarines and nearly 80 shore activities within the command’s area of responsibility.

In August of 1994, he entered the U.S. Navy attending basic training in Great Lakes, Illinois. Upon completion of basic training, Master Chief Perryman attended Basic Enlisted Submarine School (BESS) and Electronics Technician "A" and "C" Schools in Groton, Conn.

His at sea assignments as a Submarine Electronics Technician include USS Bremerton (SSN 698), USS Dolphin (AGSS 555), and USS Cheyenne (SSN 773).

Ashore his in-rate assignments include the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the Staff of Commander, Submarine Squadron Seven.

In April 2010, he attended the Senior Enlisted Academy Resident course and the Command Master Chief/Chief of the Boat Capstone course before reporting to USS Hawaii (SSN 776) in June of 2010 as Chief of the Boat.

Master Chief Perryman’s other Command Senior Enlisted Leader positions include the staff of Commander, Submarine Force U.S. Pacific Fleet as the Tactical Readiness Evaluation Team Chief of the Boat, Command Master Chief for Commander, Submarine Group Seven, Force Master Chief for Commander, Submarine Force Atlantic, and Command Senior Enlisted Leader for United States Strategic Command.

Master Chief Perryman is authorized to wear numerous personal awards. He is most proud of the six Battle "E" awards and the other unit awards he has earned with his shipmates.

Tags:
**Fleet Master Chief  John Perryman**USFFC

Terms:
**Leadership
**EXHIBIT32**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersignedcertifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of W. R. Grace & Co.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ A. E. Festa                                    |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief Executive Officer              |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/ Hudson La Force III                            |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

Date: May 9, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q AS
OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  349,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,684
<INVENTORY>                                      4,367
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               416,399
<PP&E>                                         372,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,716,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          338,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                     795,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,716,165
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               984,227
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  863,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                    42,846
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
crowdstrikefourthamendme






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1
NO. 07-07-0303-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 2, 2007

______________________________

GARY ZARS DBA GARY’S POOL AND PATIO STORE, APPELLANT

V.

JEREMY AND BRANDI BROWNLOW, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF HAYS COUNTY;

NO. 8877-C; HONORABLE HOWARD S. WARNER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON NOTICE OF FILING BANKRUPTCY

On September 27, 2007, appellant Gary Zars filed a Notice of Filing Bankruptcy in

this appeal. A copy of his Notice of Bankruptcy Case Filing in the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Western Division of Texas was attached to the notice, indicating

that the bankruptcy case was filed with the bankruptcy court on or about September 18,

2007. 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8, this appeal is suspended until

further order of this court. The parties are directed to advise the clerk of this court of any
2

change in the status of appellant Gary Zars’ bankruptcy proceeding which would affect the

status of this appeal, including but not limited to the filing of a Motion to Reinstate. Tex. R.

App. P. 8.3. 

It is so ordered. 

Per Curiam