alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2010184EN.01048401.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/484 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/484

---

Friday 24 April 2009The business of electronic money institutions ***I

P6_TA(2009)0322

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 April 2009 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions, amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC (COM(2008)0627 – C6-0350/2008 – 2008/0190(COD))

2010/C 184 E/82

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0627),

having regard to Article 251(2), Article 47(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0350/2008),

having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 25 March 2009 to adopt the proposal as amended, in accordance with the first indent in the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0056/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Friday 24 April 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0190

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions, amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/110/EC.)

---
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   |   | I, George Babich,, Jr. certify that: |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K  of Checkpoint Systems, Inc.; and |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                           |  |  |
| Date:  April 25, 2016 | By:     /s/ George Babich, Jr, |   |
|                                      | Name: George Babich, Jr,Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer            (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
#### STEPHENS et al., Appellants, v. WADDELLENTZ CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by James Stephens and another against the Waddell Entz Company. G. W. Stephens, for appellants.. *1150Antonio Knauth, for respondent.

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the attachment reinstated.
(84 South. 839)

#### OAKLAND AUTOMOBILE v. STATE ex rel. TATE, Solicitor. Appeal of BELL.

(6 Div. 972.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 15, 1920.)

Intoxicating liquors <&wkey;251—Wife’s business RELATIONS WITH HUSBAND AND NOTORIETY OF HIS OFFENSES AGAINST PROHIBITION LAWS RAISED PRESUMPTION SHE KNEW HIS USE OF HER AUTOMOBILE WAS ILLEGAL.

In proceeding to forfeit an automobile for its illegal use by claimant’s husband for carrying contraband liquors, circumstances, including claimant's intimate social and business relations with her husband and the notoriety of his repeated offenses against the prohibition laws, *held*sufficient to generate a strong inference that she must have known or suspected that he was using her car in aid of his unlawful enterprises, thereby imposing upon her the duty of inquiry and prevention.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Hugh A. Locke, Judge.

Proceeding by the State of Alabama, on the relation of Joseph R. Tate, Solicitor, to forfeit one Oakland automobile, in which Lola Bell appeared as claimant. From judgment for relator, claimant appeals.

Affirmed.

J. B. Aird, of Birmingham, for appellant.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

SOMERVILLE, J.

If the testimony of the claimant were taken as true, it would show that she was the actual owner of the automobile in question at the time of its illegal use for the carriage of contraband liquors by her husband, and that she was free from the fault of participation therein or of negligence with respect to its prevention.

The circumstances, however, including her intimate social and business relations with her husband, and the nótoriety of his repeated offenses against the prohibition laws, are sufficient to generate a strong inference that she must have known or suspected that he was using this car in aid of his unlawful enterprises, thereby imposing upon her the duty of inquiry and prevention.

The printed record of her testimony on cross-examination shows an evasiveness and want of candor which may well have justified the trial judge in .refusing to give credit to her claims. It is evident that he did not believe her testimony, and as he heard her testify, and observed her demeanor and judged her sincerity, we cannot, upon the showings of the record, declare his conclusion erroneous.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Voyager Learning Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge: 1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ Richard J. Surratt                                   
|Richard J. Surratt, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                         
|August 31, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Tour of Printing and Distribution Facilities

AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

ACTION: Notice of commission visit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In early May, Postal Rate Commissioners and staff will tour 
facilities of CTC Corp. and Quebecor Inc. (both in Chicago, IL) and the 
United Parcel Service (UPS) international air hub (in Louisville, KY). 
The Quebecor visit will include the logistics center, consolidation 
facility, and bindery.

DATES: The visit is scheduled as follows:

May 7 (p.m.): CTC Corp.
May 8 (a.m.): Quebecor Inc.
May 8 (p.m.): United Parcel Service

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
Postal Rate Commission, Suite 300, 1333 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20268-0001, 202-789-6820.

    Dated: May 1, 2001.
Garry J. Sikora,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11271 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
(87 South. 227)

#### Ex parte RUSSELL.

(4 Div. 885.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 26, 1920.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 30, 1920.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Application by Georgia Russell for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of such court (87 South. 221) in a prosecution for murder.

Writ denied.

Farmer, Merrill & Farmer, of Dothan, for appellant.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Application of Georgia Russell for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court rendered on the appeal of Georgia Russell against the State of Alabama, 87 South. 221. Writ denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Benique Gonzales, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered February 5, 1986, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Clear All

        04 June 2022    

                    Keel Laying Ceremony Held for First Columbia-Class Ballistic Missile Submarine                 
                QUONSET POINT, R.I. – General Dynamics Electric Boat conducted a keel laying ceremony for the first Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine, USS District of Columbia (SSBN 826) at Quonset Point, Rhode Island, June 4.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6803

ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES WADE, Food Services Director; B. OSBOURNE, Food 

Services Worker; LT. LAFAYETTE FLEMING; WARDEN TRACY RAY; 

JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District 

Judge. (7:11-cv-00198-SGW-RSB)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: October 3, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Joseph DePaola, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric Joseph DePaola appeals the district court’s order 

granting the Defendants summary judgment on his First Amendment 

claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use 

and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc 

(2006), and dismissing his Fourteenth Amendment equal protection 

claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. DePaola v. Wade, No. 7:11-cv-00198-SGW-RSB 

(W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


November 21, 2019


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 1988


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1988 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-234565 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
# C_2009154EN.01001801.xml

| 7.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/18

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 154/07

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Cayenne–Maripasoula
  Cayenne–Saül
  Cayenne–Grand-Santi
  Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni–Grand-Santi |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1.7.2009 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Text of the Arrêté modifying the PSO
  NOR: DEVA0912761A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do





  Directorate-General for Civil Aviation |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies@dta.aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Concerned route

Cayenne–Maripasoula

Cayenne–Saül

Cayenne–Grand-Santi

Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni–Grand-Santi

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1.7.2009

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Text of the Arrêté modifying the PSO

NOR: DEVA0912761A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

Directorate-General for Civil Aviation

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies@dta.aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31st 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report'), I, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

May 8th, 2008                     /s/ Paul B. Kravitz
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Paul B. Kravitz
                                  Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-20096

PATTI WHITMIRE CARLTON; CAROLE KEENEY HARRINGTON;

PAMELA REED;

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM; CHRIS OLIVER; NORMAN

NIELSEN; MARY SPANGLER; DANIEL SEYMOUR, 

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CV-3239

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Patti Whitmire Carlton, Carole Keeney Harrington, and Pamela Reed

appeal the district court’s summary judgment on their First Amendment

retaliation claims. We have carefully considered the pertinent portions of the

record in light of the parties’ briefs and oral arguments. We conclude Appellants

have not demonstrated any error warranting reversal. AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 13, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-20096 Document: 00511787113 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2012
#### The Gainesville, Jefferson and Southern Railroad *vs.*Wall.

Where it was shown that a cow was killed by a train, the railroad company should have produced all the witnesses present, to show that the company was not at fault. Where the engineer and fireman were always present on the engine, but only the former was sworn as a witness, and the absence of the latter was not accounted for, this was a circumstance from which the jury might infer that, had the other witness been introduced, his testimony might have shown negligence on the part of the company; and the verdict against the company was not without evidence to support it.

October 13, 1885.

Railroads. Negligence. Damages. Before Judge Estes. Hall Superior Court. February Term, 1885.

Reported in the decision.

Dunlap & Thompson, for plaintiff in error.

G. H. Prior; W. S. Pickrell; W. F. Findley, for defendant.

Blandford, Justice.

This case was a *certiorari*to grant a new trial because the verdict of a jury in a justice’s court was without evi*283dence to support it. It appears from the record that the plaintiff in error ran over a cow and killed her, belonging to defendant, and that the cow was worth as much as the jurv found by their verdict. The only witness who testified in behalf of the plaintiff in error was the engineer, and his testimony showed that the railroad company had used all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence, but the fireman, who is always on the engine with the engineer, did not testify, and his absence was not accounted for. The court overruled the *certiorari*and refused the new trial.

This court has held, in 64 *Ga.,*610, that the railroad company should produce all the witnesses present to show that the company was not at fault.

The absence of a material witness when an injury occurred, not accounted for, might authorize the jury to infer against the railroad company; they might believe that, if the fireman had been produced and had testified, his testimony would have shown negligence on the part of the railroad

This is-a small case, and we ara not inclined to interfere with the discretion of the court in refusing to award a new trial. See the case of *East*Tennessee, *Virginia & Ga. Railroad vs. Prather et*al., 14 Ga., 838.

Judgment affirmed.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 647 

To authorize the International Boundary and Water Commission to reimburse 

State and local governments of the States of Arizona, California, New 

Mexico, and Texas for expenses incurred by such a government in designing, constructing, and rehabilitating water projects under the jurisdiction 

of such Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2009 

Mr. HINOJOSA (for himself, Mr. ORTIZ, and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the International Boundary and Water Commission to reimburse State and local governments of the 

States of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas 

for expenses incurred by such a government in designing, 

constructing, and rehabilitating water projects under the 

jurisdiction of such Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 647 IH

1 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT FOR CERTAIN WATER 

2 PROJECTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The International Boundary and 

4 Water Commission is authorized to reimburse State and 

5 local governments of the States of Arizona, California, 

6 New Mexico, and Texas for expenses incurred by such a 

7 government in designing, constructing, and rehabilitating 

8 water projects under the jurisdiction of such Commission. 

9 (b) APPLICATION.—Subsection (a) shall apply to ex10 penses incurred for a water project by any such State or 

11 local government designed, constructed, or rehabilitated 

12 before or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 33 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 33 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                      Code)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),  each
of the undersigned  officers of MDI Entertainment,  Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Form  10-QSB") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and  information
contained in the Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:   AUGUST 19, 2002        /S/STEVEN M. SAFERIN
         ------------------     --------------------------------------------
                                Steven M. Saferin
                                President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
                                (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated:   AUGUST 19, 2002        /S/KENNETH M. PRZYSIECKI
         ------------------     --------------------------------------------
                                Kenneth M. Przysiecki
                                Senior Vice President, Accounting and
                                Administration, Corporate Secretary and Director
                                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




         The  foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002  (subsections  (a)  and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as a separate disclosure document.