alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Richard Auerbach, Respondent, v Barry Frank, Defendant, and Trans World International, Inc., Appellant.

— In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Trans World International, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered November 14, 1986, which (1) denied its motion for a protective order, and (2) directed it to comply with a notice for discovery and inspection dated June 1, 1986.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion for a protective order is granted, and the notice for discovery and inspection dated June 1, 1986 is vacated with leave to serve an appropriate notice for discovery and inspection.

The notice for discovery and inspection served by the plaintiff in this action should be vacated. That notice failed to specify the documents sought by the plaintiff with “reasonable particularity” (CPLR 3120 [a] [1] [i]; *see generally, Benzenberg v Telecom Plus,*119 AD2d 717; *Zimmerman v New York City Tr. Auth.,*115 AD2d 738, 739-740; *Harnett v Skandia Am. Reinsurance Corp.,*60 AD2d 515; *Rios v Donovan,*21 AD2d 409). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF PRINTPACK, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                             415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                       559
<INVENTORY>                                     80,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,275
<PP&E>                                         597,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                 243,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 608,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,632
<BONDS>                                        456,305
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,011
<OTHER-SE>                                      (6,960)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   608,436
<SALES>                                        831,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               831,689
<CGS>                                          710,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  710,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,092)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (601)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.25)
        

</TABLE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 44076 & 44077

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

MICHAEL PAUL MAGILL ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 813

Filed: December 9, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Jason D. Scott , District Judge.

Judgments of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for sexual battery of a minor child sixteen or seventeen years of age; a consecu tive unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen years; and a concurrent unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for sexual exploitation of a child, affirmed

.
Nevin, Benjamin, McKay & Bartlett LLP; Deborah A. Whipple, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A . Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
In Docket No. 44076, Michael Paul Magill pled guilty to one count of sexual battery of a

minor child sixteen or seventeen years of age, I.C . § 18

- 1508A , and one count of sexual abuse of
a child under the age of sixteen years, I.C. § 18

- 1506(1)(b). In Docket No. 44077, Magill pled

guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a child. I.C. § 18

- 1507(2)(a). In exchange for his2

guilty pleas , additional charges were dismissed. The district court sentenced Magill to a unified

term of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for sexual battery of a

minor child sixteen or seventeen years of age; a consecutive unifi ed term of fifteen years, with a
minimum period of confinement of five years, for sexual abuse of a child under the age of

sixteen years; and a concurrent unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement
of five years, for sexual exploitatio n of a child. Magill appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. Se e State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the l ength of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discr etion.

Therefore, Magill ’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of enherent Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela Fredette, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Pamela Fredette                            
|Pamela Fredette                                
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|August 11, 2009                                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Unassociated Document


    AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO

    EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of March 26,
2010 between Energy and Power Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and Shiva Subramanya (“Executive”).

    


    RECITALS

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive previously entered into that certain Executive
Employment Agreement dated as of April 17, 2009 (the “Agreement”).

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive desire to amend and modify certain provisions of the
Agreement as provided herein, effective as of the date hereof.

    


    AGREEMENT

    


    NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable
consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

    


    1.       
     Position and
Duties.  The first sentence of Section 3 of the Agreement is
hereby amended and restated as follows:

     

    “EPS will
continue to employ Executive as Executive Vice President for EPS.”

     

    2.     
      Ratification and
Incorporation of Executive Employment Agreement.  Except as
expressly amended hereby, all the terms, conditions and provisions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall
form a part of the Agreement for all purposes.

     

    


     

    [Signature
Page Follows]

     


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on and as of
the day and year first written above.

    


    


    COMPANY:

    


    ENERGY
AND POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.

    


    


    By:  /s/ Jay Zoellner            
Name:  Jay
Zoellner
Title:  President
and CEO

    


    


    EXECUTIVE:

    


    


    /s/ Shiva Subramanya           

    Name:  Shiva
Subramanya

    


    


    



    
      
         


      

      
        -2-
<PAGE> 1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 23







                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'
                         CONSENT OF ERNST AND YOUNG LLP



<PAGE> 2


                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. of our report dated February 18, 1997,
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Graybar Electric
Company, Inc.

Our audit also included the financial statements schedule of Graybar Electric
Company, Inc. listed in Item 14(a) for the year ended December 31, 1996. This
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the financial
statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.


                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
February 18, 1997
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 46 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Bureau of Investigation


Meeting of the CJIS Advisory Policy Board

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Justice.

ACTION: Meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the meeting of the 
Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Advisory Policy Board. The 
CJIS Advisory Policy Board is responsible for reviewing policy issues, 
uniform crime reports, and appropriate technical and operational issues 
related to the programs administered by the FBI's CJIS Division and 
thereafter, make appropriate recommendations to the FBI Director. The 
topics to be discussed will include Proposed CJIS Wide Area Network 
(WAN) Migration to the Justice Consolidation Network, the Revised 
National Crime Information Center (NCIC) Sanctions Process, and 
Secondary Dissemination of NCIC Wanted Person File Data. Discussion 
will also include the status on the National Crime Prevention and 
Privacy Compact, Update on DOJ Global and Information Sharing, and 
other issues related to the Integrated Automated Fingerprint 
Identification System, NCIC, Law Enforcement Online, National Instant 
Criminal Background Check System and Uniform Crime Reporting Programs.
    The meeting will be open to the public on a first-come, first-
seated basis. Any member of the public wishing to file a written 
statement concerning the FBI's CJIS Division programs or wishing to 
address this session should notify the Designated Federal Employee, Mr. 
Roy Weise, Programs Development Section (304) 625-2730, at least 24 
hours prior to the start of the session.
    The notification should contain the requestor's name, corporate 
designation, and consumer affiliation or government designation along 
with a short statement describing the topic to be addressed and the 
time needed for the presentation. A requestor will ordinarily be 
allowed not more than 15 minutes to present a topic.

DATES AND TIME: The Advisory Policy Board will meet in open session 
from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. on June 5-6, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Opryland Hotel, 2802 
Opryland Drive, Nashville, Tennessee, telephone (615) 889-1000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquires may be addressed to Ms. Lori 
A. Kemp, Management Analyst, Advisory Groups Management Unit, Programs 
Development Section, FBI CJIS Division, Module C3, 1000 Custer Hollow 
Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306-0149, telephone (304) 625-2619, 
facsimile (304) 625-5090.

    Dated: April 25, 2001.
Roy G. Weise,
Designated Federal Employee, Programs Development Section, Criminal 
Justice Information Service Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
[FR Doc. 01-11129 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kyle Kearse, Also Known as Kyle Kerse-Terminal, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered on April 8, 1986, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF DENISE L. RAMOS PURSUANT TO SEC. 302

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Denise L. Ramos, Certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form
10-K/A of ITT Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

/s/ DENISE L. RAMOSDenise L. Ramos Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: July 19, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 2 p.m. on Thursday, April 26, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters relating to the Corporation's corporate and resolution activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director Ellen S. Seidman (Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), seconded by Director John M. Reich (Appointive), concurred in by Director John D. Hawke, Jr. (Comptroller of the Currency), and chairman Donna Tanoue, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no notice earlier than April 20, 2001, of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: April 27, 2001.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James D. LaPierre,

Deputy Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-11046 Filed 4-27-01; 4:45 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
AND CCC SURETY OPERATIONS EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
AND SCHEDULES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           432,964
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 485,257
<CASH>                                           1,569
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              70,125
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          72,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 815,253
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                146,581
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            185,061
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                118,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           441
<OTHER-SE>                                     303,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   815,253
<PREMIUMS>                                     191,804
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             18,232
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 222
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      34,328
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     79,379
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            34,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,288
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Kenneth McDonald, Petitioner, v Walter Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Determination unanimously annulled on the law and petition granted *(see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*125 AD2d 923, *Iv granted*69 NY2d 608). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the 1933 Act
    Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-212680) and Amendment No. 718 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial
    statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible
    payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

  

  

  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  

  

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  December 3, 2019