21376 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 83 / Monday, April 30, 2001 / Notices

East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland

20814. Written comments may also be

sent to the Office of the Secretary by

facsimile at (301) 504–0127 or by e-mail

at cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

information about the proposed

collection of information call or write

Linda L. Glatz, Office of Planning and

Evaluation, Consumer Product Safety

Commission, Washington, DC 20207;

(301) 504–0416, Ext. 2226.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Estimated Burden

The Commission staff estimates that

there are 850 firms required to test

mattresses and keep records. The staff

further estimates that each respondent

will spend 26 hours for testing and

recordkeeping annually for a total of

22,100 hours of annual burden. At a cost

of $13.50 per hour, the average hourly

non-farm wage figure, U.S. Statistical

Abstract, 2000, the annualized cost to

respondents would be $298,350.

B. Request for Comments

The Commission solicits written

comments from all interested persons

about the proposed collection of

information. The Commission

specifically solicits information relevant

to the following topics:

—Whether the collection of information

described above is necessary for the

proper performance of the

Commission’s functions, including

whether the information would have

practical utility;

—Whether the estimated burden of the

proposed collection of information is

accurate;

—Whether the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected could be enhanced; and

—Whether the burden imposed by the

collection of information could be

minimized by use of automated,

electronic or other technological

collection techniques, or other forms

of information technology.

Dated: April 25, 2001.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

[FR Doc. 01–10695 Filed 4–27–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355–01–M

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY

COMMISSION

[CPSC Docket No. 01–C0006]

Cosco, Inc., a Corporation, and Safety

1st, Inc., a Corporation, Subsidiaries of

Dorel U.S.A., Inc., Provisional

Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement

and Order; Correction

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety

Commission published a document in

the Federal Register of April 9, 2001,

concerning a provisionally accepted

settlement agreement and order with

Cosco, Inc. and Safety 1st, Inc. The

Summary paragraph of the document

contained incomplete information about

the two civil penalties contained in the

agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ronald G. Yelenik or Patricia Kennedy,

Trial Attorneys, Office of Compliance

and Enforcement, Consumer Product

Safety Commission, Washington, DC

20207; telephone 301–504–0626.

Correction

In the Federal Register issue of April

9, 2001, 66 FR 18450, in the Summary,

add before the period of the final

sentence the words ‘‘for Cosco and a

civil penalty of $450,000 for Safety 1st.’’

Dated: April 24, 2001.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–10691 Filed 4–27–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP01–157–000]

Georgia-Pacific Corp.; Notice of

Petition for Declaratory Order

April 24, 2001.

Take notice that on April 16, 2001,

Georgia-Pacific Corporation (GeorgiaPacific) filed a petition for a declaratory

order in the above-styled proceeding,

requesting that the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission issue an order

declaring that a prospective lease or

other long-term arrangement under

which a third-party owner of an

industrial facility has the right to a

portion of the capacity of GeorgiaPacific’s pipeline that crosses the

Arkansas/Louisiana border: (1) Shall not

constitute the transportation of natural

gas in interstate commerce; and (2) shall

not subject such pipeline to any greater

Commission regulation or oversight

than currently in place.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with §§ 385.214 or

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such motions or

protests must be filed on or before May

15, 2001. Protests will be considered by

the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room. This filing may

be viewed on the web at

http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm

(call 202–208–2222 for assistance).

Comments, protests, and interventions

may be filed electronically via the

internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

on the Commission’s web site at http:/

/www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–10584 Filed 4–27–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

Notice of Application Accepted for

Filing and Soliciting Comments,

Protests, and Motions To Intervene

April 24, 2001.

Take notice that the following

hydroelectric application has been filed

with the Commission and is available

for public inspection:

a. Type of Application: Preliminary

Permit.

b. Project No.: 11942–000.

c. Date filed: April 3, 2001.

d. Applicant: Hammond

Hydroelectric Company.

e. Name of Project: Big Creek

Hydroelectric Project.

f. Location: On Big Creek, on the

border between Custer and Lemhi

Counties, Idaho. The project would

utilize lands of the United States within

Challis National Forest, as well as lands

administered by the Bureau of Land

Management.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 USC 791(a)–825(r).