alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
FORM 10-K, DATED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,467,302
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            11,150,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     24,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      27,988,290
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        27,985,306
<LOANS>                                     79,608,471
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,070,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             125,189,782
<DEPOSITS>                                 111,957,393
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,900,794
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       356,844
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,731,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             125,189,782
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,796,396
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,112,064
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,129,794
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,038,227
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,452,159
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,452,159
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,586,068
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  230,059
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,118,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,860,425
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,860,425
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,134,025
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    0.76
<LOANS-NON>                                    809,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             2,465,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               964,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  180,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    56,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,070,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           178,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        892,000
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 10, 2019

NO. 03-19-00206-CR

Tammie Mediati, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the order entered by the trial court. It appears that the Court lacks 

jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                               EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

                                                                      Year Ended
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>        <C>        <C>
                                                           Dec. 26,   Dec. 27,   Dec. 28,
                                                             1999       1998       1997
                                                           --------   --------   --------

 Income from continuing operations                         $339,939   $305,631   $396,504

 Less dividends on preferred stock                           14,075     14,040      7,020
                                                           --------   --------   --------
 Income from continuing operations attributable
  to common stock                                          $325,864   $291,591   $389,484
                                                           ========   ========   ========

 Average shares outstanding (basic)                          80,025     78,882     88,475
                                                           --------   --------   --------

 Effect of dilutive securities:
   Convertible preferred stock                               15,948     17,549     10,968
   Stock options                                              1,487      1,745      1,871
                                                           --------   --------   --------

 Average shares outstanding (diluted)                        97,460     98,176    101,314
                                                           ========   ========   ========

 Earnings per share from continuing operations (basic)     $   4.07   $   3.70   $   4.40
                                                           ========   ========   ========

 Earnings per share from continuing operations (diluted)   $   3.49   $   3.11   $   3.91
                                                           ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99.5




     Contact:  Michael P. Hawks         (NYSE-BMC)
               (612)851-6030            FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE




     
         BMC ANNOUNCES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND




     March 7, 1997--Minneapolis, Minnesota--BMC Industries, Inc. today
     announced that its Board of Directors has approved a continuation of its
     quarterly cash dividend of $.015 cents per share.

     Shareholders of record as of March 19, 1997 will receive a dividend of
     $.015 for each share owned on that date, to be paid on April 2, 1997.

     BMC Industries, Inc. is one of the world's largest manufacturers of
     aperture masks for color picture tubes used in televisions and computer
     monitors.  The Company is also a leading producer of polycarbonate, glass
     and plastic eyewear lenses.  BMC's common stock is traded on the New York
     Stock Exchange under the symbol BMC.





                                         -30-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 7-8, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Georgetown, Mirage II Room, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20007.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Priti Mehrotra, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-2550, pm158b@nih.gov.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 25, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-10921  Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6574

JOHN JOSEPH MCPARTLIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ALTHEA ROACHE-MCDONALD, DMD-CDO Petersburg Correctional 

Complex; PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, Petersburg 

Correctional Complex; MS. LEVISTER (JANE DOE), Assistant 

Warden, Petersburg Correctional Complex,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

ERNEST PONRAJ, DDS Petersburg Correctional Complex,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:11-cv-00620-MSD-TEM)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Joseph McPartlin, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van 

Valkenburg, Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant United States Attorneys, 
2

Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

John Joseph McPartlin appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six 

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 

(1971), and the court’s subsequent order denying McPartlin’s 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See McPartlin v. Roache-McDonald, No. 2:11-cv-00620-MSDTEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2015 & Apr. 22, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Understanding the Importance of Cultural Burning

Dr. Moore-Merrell and Margo Robbins discuss how the Cultural Fire Management Council facilitate the practice of cultural burning on the Yurok reservation and ancestral lands to maintain a healthier ecosystem.

### Learn how Austin FD is teaching the community about wildfire preparedness

Austin FD reminds residents they live in a fire-adapted ecosystem, so they must be prepared for wildfire.

### A conversation with U.S. Fire Administrators

Fire Administrator Dr. Lori Moore-Merrell interviews former administrator Keith Bryant about his time in office and his priorities as the OK state fire marshal.

### Wildland Urban Interface

In this episode, we talk with WUI subject matter experts about this growing risk area and wildfire resources available to structural fire departments.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 

2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00056-CV

____________

IN RE KATY SPRINGS & MANUFACTURING, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-15658

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On January 25, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. 

See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the 

petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, presiding 

judge of the 133rd District Court of Harris County, to set aside her orders to quash signed 

December 28, 2011, and January 3, 2012.
2

A trial court abuses its discretion if it reaches a decision so arbitrary and 

unreasonable as to amount to a clear and prejudicial error of law, or if it clearly fails to 

analyze or apply the law correctly. In re Cerberus Capital Mgmt., L.P., 164 S.W.3d 379, 

382 (Tex. 2005). In its mandamus petition, relator failed to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion by sustaining any of the following: (1) the objections by G2 

Partners, LLC that the document request in the subpoena is overly broad, unduly 

burdensome, and constitutes a “fishing expedition,” and (2) the objections by the real party 

in interest that the document request in the subpoena is not confined to claims and injuries 

alleged or issues relevant to the underlying lawsuit and constitutes a “fishing expedition.”

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 751 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 751

    To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2009

Mr. Barrett of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(2)) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``, as adjusted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
**Installations and Environmental Menu**

                    - Installations and Environment Home
                    - NEPA Projects
                    - At-Sea Initiatives                        - At-Sea Training
                      - Environmental Planning
                    - Ashore Initiatives                        - Home Basing and Homeporting
                      - Field Carrier Landing Practice (FCLP) 
                      - Aircraft Noise Modeling
                      - Naval Range Complex                           - Range Clearance
                        - Range Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (RAICUZ) Program
                    - Operational Energy
                    - U.S. Navy Stewards of the Sea Outreach Program

**Ashore**

----

As part of USFFC's mission to train, certify, and provide combat-ready Navy forces to combatant commanders, USFFC N46 directorate provides comprehensive support of ashore related issues such as environmental planning for home basing/homeporting in the continental United States of new or relocated aircraft and ships, associated aircraft noise analysis and land-based range sustainment including range clearance and weapons impact safety analysis. These efforts provide critical support to fleet readiness and compliance with environmental law world-wide.**HOME BASING / HOMEPORTING** Prior to making a decision on home basing aircraft and homeporting ships as part of our national defense strategy, the Navy considers the potential environmental consequences of a proposed action and reasonable alternatives in making informed decisions.**AIRCRAFT TRAINING (FCLP)** The skills required to complete carrier landings must be routinely practiced by pilots of all experience levels to maintain the requisite level of proficiency.**AIRCRAFT NOISE MODELING** The Navy prepares comprehensive noise studies to understand noise associated with airfield operations.**RANGE CLEARANCE** An environmentally beneficial program that removes and recycles munitions and targets from Navy ranges.

 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 06-14

IN RE: COURT CLOSED ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2014; FRIDAY, DECEMBER 26, 2014; AND

FRIDAY, JANUARY 2, 2015.

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be

closed on Friday, November 28, 2014; Friday, December 26, 2014; and Friday, January 2, 2015.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and

Procedure, Friday, November 28, 2014; Friday, December 26, 2014; and Friday, January 2, 2015,

will be considered days when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: October 16, 2014 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Steve Mossman, in his official capacity as 

Denton County Tax Assessor-Collector,

 Appellant,

v.

Banatex LLC,

 Appellee.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00245-CV

Appeal from the

431st District Court

of Denton County, Texas 

(TC# 2012-71334-431)

O R D E R

It is the ORDER of this Court that the brief of the Appellant, Steve Mossman, in his official 

capacity as Denton County Tax Assessor-Collector, received in the Clerk’s Office on September 

16, 2013, not be filed because it fails to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief 

does not: (1) give a complete list of all of the parties and the names and addresses of all trial and 

appellate counsel, TEX.R.APP.P. 38.1(a); (2) include a table of contents with references to the 

pages of the brief, TEX.R.APP.P. 38.1(b); and (3) include an index of authorities arranged 

alphabetically and indicating the pages of the brief where the authorities are cited, TEX.R.APP.P.

38.1(c). Further, the statement of facts section of the brief must include citations to the record 

(not the appendix attached to the brief). TEX.R.APP.P. 38.1(g). The brief also does not include 

a certificate of compliance stating the number of words in the document. TEX.R.APP.P. 9.1(i)(3). 

Therefore, the above mentioned brief is being returned and a corrected brief shall be prepared and 

filed with this Court on or before October 7, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
# Data Dictionary

# Chemicals Table

# WildLand Federal Agency Codes

# Edit Requirements

# Relational Edits

# Security Levels

# Incident Flatfile Trans Format

# Incident Module Rules
Exhibit 99(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Axsys Technologies, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Stephen W. Bershad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|March 24, 2003                                                   |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Stephen W. BershadStephen W. Bershad
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Axsys Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Axsys
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 15


R&B Falcon Corporation



     We are aware that R&B Falcon Corporation has incorporated by
reference  in  its Registration Statements No.  333-43475,   333-
67755,   333-67757,   333-68101,   333-81179,   333-81181,   333-
81381,  333-88839,  333-88841 and 333-88843 its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1999, which includes our report dated
October   29,  1999  covering  the  unaudited  interim  financial
information contained therein.  Pursuant to Regulation C  of  the
Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a  part  of
the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a
report  prepared or certified by our firm within the  meaning  of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/Arthur Andersen LLP

Houston, Texas
November 12, 1999