alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### American Barrick Resources Corporation et al., Respondents, v Canarim Investment Corp., Ltd., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about September 29, 1988, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed as against appellants, with costs.

This appeal stems from a libel action arising out of what plaintiffs characterize as a "disinformation campaign” allegedly conducted by defendant Scott L. Smith, president of defendant Gold Standard, Inc., with respect to a lawsuit filed in the State of Utah over ownership and operation of a gold mine. Three Canadian defendants named in the libel action appeal from the denial of their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We find that the record does not contain sufficient evidence that Smith was acting as agent under the control of or for the benefit of defendants-appellants Canarim Investment Corp., Ltd., 321264 B.C. Ltd., and Reyard Saadien, to support long-arm jurisdiction under CPLR 302. In our view, the stock ownership and corporate control exercised by certain of appellants in defendant Gold Standard, Inc., without more, does not provide a sufficient basis to constitute Gold Standard’s president an agent of appellánts for jurisdictional purposes. *(See, Low v Bayerische Motoren Werke,*88 AD2d 504, 506 [1st Dept 1982].) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10488]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1361-DR]

Washington; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Washington, (FEMA-1361-DR), dated March 1, 2001, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Washington is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 1, 2001: Chelan and Kittitas Counties for 
Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Robert J. Adamcik,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-10488 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
```
# CE2010087EN.01034401.xml

| 1.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 87/344 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 87/344

---

Wednesday 11 March 2009Compliance with flag State requirements ***II

P6_TA(2009)0112

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2009 on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on compliance with flag State requirements (14288/2/2008 – C6-0484/2008 – 2005/0236(COD))

2010/C 87 E/60

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

having regard to the Council common position (14288/2/2008 – C6-0484/2008) (1),

1

having regard to the statement of the Member States on maritime safety (15859/2008),

having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2005)0586),

2

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0069/2009),

| 1. | Approves the common position; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position;

| 2. | Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;

| 3. | Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

| 4. | Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

Official Journal of the European Union

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 330 E, 30.12.2008, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ C 27 E, 31.1.2008, p. 140.

2

---
Lista para la prevención

de incendios dirigida

a los cuidadores de 

adultos mayores 

Los adultos mayores tienen más 

probabilidades de morir en incendios en el 

hogar, ya que sus movimientos son más lentos 

o tienen problemas escuchando los detectores 

de humo. Asegúrese de que las personas que 

usted conoce estén preparadas y seguras. 

Marque con una cruz si las siguientes afirmaciones se cumplen en su hogar. 


Detectores de humo 

{{ Hay detectores de humo en cada nivel de su hogar. 

{{ Hay detectores de humo dentro y fuera de los 

dormitorios. 

{{ Los detectores de humo son comprobados todos 

los meses. 

{{ Las baterías de los detectores de humo tienen 

suficiente carga. 

{{ Los detectores de humo tienen menos de 10 años 

de antigüedad. 

{{ Los detectores de humo se pueden escuchar desde 

cada habitación. 

Seguridad en la cocina 

{{ No hay artículos cerca de la estufa que puedan 

incendiarse. 

{{ Las personas se mantienen atentas en la cocina 

cuando los alimentos se están friendo, asando, 

cocinando en la parrilla o hirviendo. 

Seguridad para fumadores 

Si las personas fuman, asegúrese de que tomen 

precaución. 

{{ Las personas fuman fuera de la casa y nunca en la 

cama. 

{{ Las personas apagan los cigarrillos completamente 

en un cenicero de base ancha que no corre riesgo 

de virarse. 

{{ Las personas nunca fuman cuando se encuentran 

alrededor de oxígeno medicinal. 

Seguridad al usar el calefactor 

{{ Los calefactores se encuentran a 3 pies o más de 

distancia a cualquier artículo que pueda incendiarse. 

{{ Las personas apagan las velas antes de salir de la 

habitación. 

Plan de escape 

{{ Tiene un plan de escape para caso de incendio 

que muestra 2 salidas desde cada habitación. 

{{ Las salidas no están bloqueadas por muebles u 

otros elementos. 

{{ Todos conocen el lugar seguro para reunirse fuera 

de la casa. 

{{ El plan de escape funciona para todos, incluso 

las personas en sillones de rueda, con auxiliares 

auditivos o espejuelos. 

{{ Existe un teléfono cerca de la cama para llamar al 

número local de emergencia en caso de incendio. 

Detectores de monóxido de carbono 

{{ Los detectores de monóxido de carbono se 

encuentran localizados en cada nivel de su hogar. 

{{ Los detectores de monóxido de carbono tienen 

menos de 7 años de antigüedad. 

Seguridad eléctrica y al usar 

electrodomésticos 

{{ Las extensiones eléctricas no corren por debajo 

de las alfombras. 

{{ Todas las extensiones eléctricas están en buenas 

condiciones, no se encuentran rotas o con cables 

expuestos. 

{{ Las personas limpian el filtro de la secadora de 

ropa después de cada uso. 

{{ Todos los tomacorrientes funcionan correctamente 

y no se sienten calientes al tocarlos. (Si se sienten 

calientes, llame a su arrendador o a un electricista) 

Aprenda más sobre la prevención de incendios en: 

www.usfa.fema.gov
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LINDA MAHER,

Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM D. MAHER,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2968

[December 13, 2018]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kathleen J. Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 50-2010-DR-011577-XXXX-NB.

Lydia A. Worden and Jennifer E. Reisler of Beaulieu-Fawcett Law 

Group, P.A., Delray Beach, for appellant.

Randall Burks and Robin Bresky of Law Offices of Robin Bresky, Boca 

Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
IN RE: PETITION OF THE TAX CLAIM BUREAU OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TO SELL FREE AND CLEAR THE PROPERTY OF: ESTATE OF ANNA S. ROWLEY, HER HEIRS AND ASSIGNS: BEING MAP NO. 26-02-09-0-418 PETITION OF: CARL F. MILLER : : : : : : : : : : No. 149 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 19th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6713

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL DWIGHT BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-01-482-WDQ; CA-03-3270-WDQ)

Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: July 2, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Dwight Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Philip S. Jackson,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. Brown cannot appeal

this order unless a circuit judge or justice issues a certificate

of appealability, and a certificate of appealability will not issue

absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A habeas appellant meets

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find

that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude Brown has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
- Home
- Media Center
- Press Releases

# USCP Officers Arrest Man with Rifle Thanks to Citizen Tip

Press Release

Today, United States Capitol Police (USCP) officers arrested a man who was carrying a rifle in the park across from Union Station.

"See something, say something' is not just an empty slogan. We are grateful for the individual who alerted our officer to the man with a gun in the park," said USCP Chief Tom Manger. "These cops immediately ran toward the man with the loaded gun. As always -- I am proud of our cops."

On Tuesday, at approximately 12:40 p.m., a witness alerted a USCP officer that a man with a rifle was walking in the park across from Union Station -- the area of the park near Delaware Avenue and Columbus Circle, NE. The officer called for backup, which quickly arrived. 

Officers spotted the man carrying a rifle in one hand, so they demanded that he drop the gun. When the man refused, an assisting USCP officer tased the suspect, so officers could take the gun and make the arrest. The park was temporarily closed while investigators searched the area and the suspect's belongings. 

The suspect has been identified as 21 year old Ahmir Lavon Merrell of Atlanta, GA. Police records show he has a warrant for a probation violation out of Georgia. 

While the investigation continues, it is not yet clear what Merrell was doing in Washington, D.C. So far he is being charged with Felon in Possession of a Firearm, Unregistered Ammunition, Unregistered Firearm, Fugitive from Justice, and Unlawful Activities. 

**NOTE**:*This year, so far, the United States Capitol Police has confiscated more than 30 guns. All weapons are prohibited from Capitol Grounds -- even if you have a gun that is legally registered in another state, or the District of Columbia.*

## Media Center

              - Press Releases
              - USCP Arrests
              - USCP FAST FACTS

## Yearly Archive

                  - 2024               (4)          
                  - 2023               (26)          
                  - 2022               (36)          
                  - 2021               (73)          
                  - 2020               (9)          
                  - 2019               (15)          
                  - 2018               (14)          
                  - 2017               (28)          
                  - 2016               (18)          
                  - 2015               (10)          
                  - 2014               (14)          
                  - 2013               (10)          
                  - 2012               (10)          
                  - 2011               (13)          
                  - 2010               (10)          
                  - 2009               (18)          
                  - 2008               (11)          
                  - 2007               (14)          
                  - 2006               (23)          
                  - 2005               (18)          
                  - 2004               (24)          
                  - 2003               (15)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-34745, 33-76780, 333-00075,333-71339, 333-07091, 333-71335, 333-81949, 333-55962, and 333-121106 of Aleris International, Inc. of our reports dated March 7, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Aleris International, Inc., Aleris InternationalInc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Aleris International, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Cleveland, Ohio

March 15, 2006
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40356

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIE LELAND McQUEEN, also known as

Will, and ORLANDO TYRE AUSTIN, also 

known as Lance, 

 Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CR-33-2

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Codefendants-appellants Willie Leland McQueen and Orlando

Tyre Austin appeal their convictions and sentences for collection

of extension of credit by extortionate means, possession of

cocaine base with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to possess

cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 894 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have reviewed the

arguments and the record and find no reversible error as to
No. 96-40356

-2-

McQueen’s claim that the evidence was insufficient to support his

conspiracy conviction. See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d

1539, 1551 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113 (1995);

United States v. El-Zoubi, 993 F.2d 442, 445 (5th Cir. 1993). 

The district court did not clearly err in imposing a Sentencing

Guidelines enhancement based on a finding that the appellants had

“abducted” one of their victims in committing the collection-ofcredit offenses. See United States v. Dumpson, No. 95-50106,

slip op. at 10 (5th Cir. Oct. 19, 1995) (unpublished); U.S.S.G. 

§ 2E2.1(b)(3)(A). The district court also did not clearly err in

finding that Austin was a “leader” in the offense and that

McQueen was a “manager.” See United States v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d

927, 932-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 54 (1995);

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a), (b). Austin’s contention that the district

court violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 in adopting factual statements

in his presentence report is meritless. See United States v.

Whitlow, 979 F.2d 1008, 1011 (5th Cir. 1992). McQueen’s argument

that the district court issued a jury instruction on the

collection-of-credit offense that was at variance with, or

constructively amended, the superseding indictment is also

without merit. See United States v. Haymes, 610 F.2d 309, 310-11

(5th Cir. 1980). 

Austin’s pro se motion to relieve his appointed appellate

counsel of his duties is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
No. 96-40356

-3-
# CE2010184EN.01018701.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/187 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/187

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators ***II

P6_TA(2009)0242

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (14541/1/2008 – C6-0020/2009 – 2007/0197(COD))

2010/C 184 E/48

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council common position (14541/1/2008 – C6-0020/2009),

having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0530),

1

having regard to the amended Commission proposal (COM(2008)0908),

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0235/2009),

| 1. | Approves the common position as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position as amended;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, 18.6.2008, P6_TA(2008)0296.

1

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009P6_TC2-COD(2007)0197

Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 22 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 713/2009.)

---
December 10, 2015 FILED IN 

### Olen Ware istcourtofappeals «.««..«« M •?. « HOUSTON, TEXAS 21010 Rushville Court



### Katy, Texas 77449 DEC 1 4 2015 olenware@vahoo.com 

# 832-858-6065 christopher^prine CLERK.



### Court of Appeals Number: 01-13-00545-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1328054 

### Court of Appeals First District 301 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002-2066


### Hello Mr. Rodriguez, 

### I have enclosed funds to obtain the referenced transcripts, and also added the additional one 

### dollar fee in orderto have the transcript added to a disc. Please advise when ready, and Iwill be glad to pick it up. Thank you for your time.Sherry Radack Chief Justice Terry Jennings Evelyn Keyes Laura Carter Higley Jane Bland Michael Massengale Harvey Brown Rebeca Huddle Russell Lloyd Justices 

## Z^^CdT^^^



# Court of Appeals First District 301 Fannin Street 

### Houston, Texas 77002-2066 November 25,2015 David C. Bolton Texas Writ Works 

### 6804 E. Hwy 6 South #525 Houston, TX 77083



### RE: Court ofAppeals Number: 01-13-00545-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1328054 ChristopherA. Prime Clerk of the Court Janet Williams ChiefStaffattorney Phone: 713-274-2700 FAX: 713-755-8131 www.aeaurt5.gov/lEtcaa.a3px



### Style: Olen Ware II v. The State ofTexas 

### This is to acknowledge your communication received October 14,2015. Our Court does not provide free copies of any documents without prepayment ofcosts and postage. The fees 

### associated with obtaining copies ofcourt records are as follows: ten cents ($0.10) per page for the first SO pages, and 50 cents ($0.50) per page thereafter. Certified copies including certificate 

### and seal certification arc one dollar ($1.00) per page with a five dollar ($5.00) minimum. Audio disks oforal argument are S25.00 each. The costs for your request are as follows: Reporter's Record Reporter's Record Clerk's Record 

### Shipping Fee Total 

### 771 pages x $0.50 a page 

### 50 pages x $0.10 a page 

### 150pages x $0.50 a page $ 385.50 $5.00 S 75.00

Please make the cashier's check or mom District ofTexas. 

### rder payable to Court of Appeals, First Sincerely,


### Christopher A. Prine, Clerk ofthe Court By Jesse Rodriguez* Deputy Clerk IV9407 1102 0079 3803 7163 27
$3,935 US POSTAGE FIRST-CLASS Dec 10 2015 Mailed from ZIP 77449

071V00871473 

# I USPS FIRST CLASS :| : OLENWARE li I 21010 RUSHVILLECOURT 

### I i KATYTX 77449

V SHIP COURT OF APPEALS FIRST DISTRICT TO: 301 FANNIN ST. * « U 

### JESSE RODRIGUEZ DEPUTY CLERK IV If $ X 

### HOUSTON TX 77002 $

SH NOTICE ON REVERSE regardingUPSTerm: customs purposes. Ifexported from the US,:' Regulations. Diversioncontraryto lawh

» >

3 r>
.X.

„/ authorUes UPStoactas forwarding agentloiexportcontroland iexp'ottedf rofn theUS In accordance with theExportAdministration RRDR0915.