alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6511 

To prohibit funding for the Environmental Protection Agency to be used 

to implement or enforce a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gases, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2010 

Mr. POE of Texas (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. 

MCKEON, Mr. PITTS, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. HARPER, Mr. 

LAMBORN, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. COLE, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. 

SHADEGG, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. OLSON, Mr. POSEY, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. HERGER, 

and Ms. FOXX) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit funding for the Environmental Protection Agency 

to be used to implement or enforce a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gases, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Affordable 

5 Energy Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 6511 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FUNDING FOR CAP-AND-TRADE 

2 PROGRAM FOR GREENHOUSE GASES. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, no funds appropriated or otherwise available 

5 for the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

6 Agency may be used to implement or enforce— 

7 (1) a cap-and-trade program; or 

8 (2) any statutory or regulatory requirement 

9 pertaining to emissions of one or more greenhouse 

10 gases from stationary sources that is issued or be11 comes applicable or effective after January 1, 2011, 

12 including— 

13 (A) any such requirement under section 

14 111 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7411) or 

15 part C of title I of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7470 

16 et seq.); and 

17 (B) any such permitting requirement 

18 under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et 

19 seq.). 

20 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

21 (1) The term ‘‘cap-and-trade program’’ means 

22 any regulatory program established after the date of 

23 enactment of this Act that provides for the sale, auc24 tion, or other distribution of a limited amount of al25 lowances that permit the emission of one or more 

26 greenhouse gases. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 6511 IH

1 (2) The term ‘‘greenhouse gas’’ includes, with 

2 respect to a cap-and-trade program under subsection 

3 (a)(1) or a requirement under subsection (a)(2), any 

4 of the following: 

5 (A) Carbon dioxide. 

6 (B) Methane. 

7 (C) Nitrous oxide. 

8 (D) Sulfur hexafluoride. 

9 (E) Hydrofluorocarbons. 

10 (F) Perfluorocarbons. 

11 (G) Any other anthropogenic gas des12 ignated as a greenhouse gas for purposes of 

13 such cap-and-trade program or such require14 ment. 

15 (3) The term ‘‘stationary source’’ has the 

16 meaning given such term in section 111(a)(3) of the 

17 Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7411(a)(3)). 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Cite as Wimmer Family Trust v. FirstEnergy Corp., 123 Ohio St.3d 144, 2009-Ohio-4304.]

WIMMER FAMILY TRUST, APPELLANT, v. FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION;

OHIO EDISON COMPANY, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as Wimmer Family Trust v. FirstEnergy Corp., 

123 Ohio St.3d 144, 2009-Ohio-4304.] 

Judgment of the court of appeals vacated on the authority of Corrigan v. Illum. 

Co., and cause remanded to the trial court for a final declaration of the 

metes and bounds of the easement. 

(No. 2009-0249 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided September 1, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 08CA009392, 

2008-Ohio-6870. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated on the authority of 

Corrigan v. Illum. Co., 122 Ohio St.3d 265, 2009-Ohio-2524, 910 N.E.2d 1009, 

and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a final declaration of the metes and 

bounds of the easement. 

 MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, LANZINGER, and 

CUPP, JJ., concur. 

PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. 

__________________ 

 Lester S. Potash, for appellant. 

 Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Donald S. Scherzer, and John J. Schriner, for 

appellee. 

______________________
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Frank, McCl anahan and Senior Judge Willis

MELVIN SPROUSE MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1329-06-2 PER CURIAM MARCH 6, 2007 ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

FROM THE CIRCUIT C OURT OF ORANGE COUNTY Daniel R. Bouton, Judge (Christian A. Brashear, on brief), for appellant. Appellant submitting on brief. (Robert F. Beard; Michae l J. Hallahan, II, Guardian ad litem , for the minor child, on brief), for appellee. Appellee and Guardian ad litem submitting on brief.
Melvin Sprouse appeals the tria l court’s decision terminating hi s residual parental rights to his minor son, D.M., pursuant to Co de § 16.1-283(C)(1) an d 16.1-283(C)(2). Fi nding no error, we affirm. We view the evidence in the light most favor able to the prevailing party below and grant to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom. See Logan v. Fairfax County Dep’t of
Human Dev. , 13 Va. App. 123, 128, 409 S.E.2d 460, 462 (1991). “‘[T]ermination of [residual] parental rights is a grave, dras tic and irreversible action.’” He len W. v. Fairfax County Dep’t of
Human Dev. , 12 Va. App. 877, 883, 407 S.E.2d 25, 28-29 (1991) (quoting Lowe v. Dept. of Pub. Welfare of the City of Richmond , 231 Va. 277, 280, 343 S.E.2d 70, 72 (1986)). When considering termination of a pa rent’s residual parent al rights to a child, “the paramount

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.- 2 - consideration of a trial court is the child’s best interests.” Logan , 13 Va. App. at 128, 409 S.E.2d at 463. On review, “[a] trial c ourt is presumed to have thor oughly weighed all the evidence, considered the statutory requirements, and made its determination based on the child’s best interests.” Farley v. Farley , 9 Va. App. 326, 329, 387 S.E.2d 794, 795 (1990). “The trial court’s judgment, ‘when based on evidence heard ore tenus , will not be disturbed on appeal unless plainly wrong or without evid ence to support it.’” Logan , 13 Va. App. at 128, 409 S.E.2d at 463 (quoting Peple v. Peple , 5 Va. App. 414, 422, 364 S.E.2d 232, 237 (1988)). In light of these standards, and based upon our review of the record (including the trial court’s findings as reflected in its April 27, 2006 order for involuntary termination of residual parental rights, the writte n statement of facts, an d the trial court’s written additions to the record made in accordance with Rule 5A:8 ), we conclude that the trial court’s decisi on finding that there was clear and convincing evidence to support termination of Sprous e’s residual parental rights to D.M. under Code § 16.1-283(C)(1) and 16.1-283(C)(2), as being in the child’s best interests, was not plainly wrong or without evid ence to support it. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s decision. Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.8


 


LIV Capital Acquisition Corp.


 


c/o Torre Virreyes, Pedregal No. 24,
Piso 6-601
 Col. Molino del Rey México, CDMX, C.P. 11040
 
 


 


[●], 2019


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the
effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”)
for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of LIV Capital Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)
and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination and (ii) the Company’s
liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor, L.P. shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative
and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, at [●]. In exchange therefore, the Company shall
pay LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor, L.P. $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination
Date.


 


LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor, L.P. hereby agrees that it
does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the
“Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO and will not seek recourse
against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


This agreement may not be amended, modified or waived as to
any particular provision, except by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto.


 


No party hereto may assign this agreement or any rights, interests
or contracted obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other party. Any purported assignment in violation
of this paragraph shall be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer or assign any interest or title to the purported
assignee.


 


This agreement shall be governed by, construed in accordance
with, and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to its choice of law principles.


 





 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	LIV Capital Acquisition Corp.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:



 


 


 



    


     


    

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


	LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor, L.P.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	Acting by LIV GP Master, S.A.P.I. de C.V., its General Partner
	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title:	 




 


 


 


 


 


 





[Signature page to Administrative Services
Agreement]
El sótano y la seguridad

contra incendios

Siga estas recomendaciones sobre el sótano para

mantener su casa segura contra incendios.

Dispositivos de alerta temprana

• Instale un detector de humo en el sótano. Pruebe la alarma todos

los meses y límpiela de ser necesario. El detector de humo del

sótano debe estar conectado a otros detectores de humo del hogar.

• Si tiene equipos de gas, aceite o madera que puedan quemarse

en el sótano, debe tener también un detector de monóxido de

carbono instalado allí.

Servicios públicos

• El acceso a la caja de fusibles o al panel de cortacircuito deber ser

fácil y rápido.

• Mantenga cerradas las puertas de acceso al quemador de los

calentadores de agua a gas y los hornos a gas para evitar que las

llamas se escapen y se produzca un incendio.

Limpieza

• Mantenga alejada cualquier cosa que pueda quemarse a al menos

3 pies de los hornos, quemadores de aceite, estufas de leña,

calentadores de agua y otros equipos que produzcan calor.

• Mantenga los trapos con aceite en un contenedor hermético o

alejados de las fuentes de calor.

• La basura debe almacenarse en el sótano.

• Las lavadoras y las secadoras debe enchufarse directamente en

los tomacorrientes de la pared.

• Limpie las pelusas de los filtros cada vez que utilice la secadora.

Limpie las rejillas y los conductos de la secadora todos los años.

• Mantenga las escaleras ordenadas y seguras para una salida de

emergencia rápida.

Para obtener más información y recursos gratuitos, visite

www.usfa.fema.gov/prevention/outreach.

U.S. Fire

Administration
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 57 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | This                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                  February 8, 2007 | /s/David                  E. Fountain    |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                     | David                  E. Fountain       |
|                                     | Chief                  Financial Officer |
**Exhibit
      31.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Neil
      Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom
      Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      As
      certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
      controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
      for
      the registrant and I have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us


by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
      report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
      (the “Evaluation Date”);


and





c)
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;





5.
      As
      certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to
      the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report


financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
      weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and










May
              11, 2006/s/ Neil ChristiansenNeil ChristiansenChief Executive OfficerChief
              Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2013

NO. 03-13-00359-CV

Milton E Lindsey, Jr., Appellant

v.

Kathryn Renee Ramsey, Appellee

APPEAL FROM JUSTICE COURT, PRECINCT THREE OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE having this day come on to be considered, and the Court being of the opinion that 

it is without jurisdiction of the cause and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed for want 

of jurisdiction: IT IS ACCORDINGLY considered, adjudged and ordered that the appeal is 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified 

below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Alan E. Casnoff, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of DVL, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of DVL, Inc.


Date: March 31, 2008                              By: /s/ Alan E. Casnoff
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name:  Alan E. Casnoff
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer

      I, Henry Swain, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of DVL, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly represents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of DVL, Inc.


Date: March 31, 2008                              By: /s/ Henry Swain
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name:  Henry Swain
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
exhibit101






Exhibit 10.1   December 2, 2019  Andrew Cogan  New York, NY   Dear Andrew:   It is my pleasure to inform you that you will be a participant in the 2020 Knoll, Inc. Incentive  Compensation Program with a target incentive amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of your base   salary (the “Target Amount”).   In 2019 our efforts to diversify our sources of revenue into higher margin Lifestyle categories while  leveraging these businesses to capture a greater share of our clients’ workplace needs led to better than   industry top line growth.  When combined with efforts to improve the profitability of our Office segment  we were able to grow our profits and improve our profitability.     As leaders in 2020 we must continue to focus on improving our profitability, gaining market share,  targeting under-penetrated markets, and building our constellation of design driven brands.     Your 2020 incentive payout will be based on your achievement of your individual goals and Knoll’s  achievement of its 2020 EBITDA plan as follows:   SHORT TERM INCENTIVE   2020 Management Incentive Target:                           $ _____________   -If Knoll achieves at least seventy-five percent (75%) of its 2020 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target incentive payout of fifty percent (50%) of your Target.  -If Knoll achieves at least eighty-five percent (85%) of its 2020 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target incentive payout of seventy-five percent (75%) of your Target.  -If Knoll achieves at least ninety percent (90%) of its 2020 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target incentive payout of ninety percent (90%) of your Target.  -If Knoll achieves at least one hundred percent (100%) of its 2020 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target incentive payout of one hundred twenty five (125%) of your Target.  -If Knoll achieves at least one hundred ten percent (110%) of its 2020 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target incentive payout of one hundred fifty percent (150%) of your Target.  -If Knoll achieves at least one hundred twenty percent (120%) of its 2020 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target incentive payout of two hundred percent (200%) of your Target.  This award is subject to the approval of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of  the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors), which may exercise discretion in adjusting your award up or down  based on factors the Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors)  deems appropriate, including Knoll’s performance relative to the industry, other macroeconomic factors  and your individual performance but such award cannot exceed two hundred percent (200%) of your base  salary in any event. You must be employed by Knoll on the date this award is distributed in order to  receive this incentive.    I have great confidence in your ability to contribute to our success in 2020 and look forward to the  opportunity to present you with your award in early 2021. Thank you for all that you do for Knoll.   Sincerely,   _______________
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Lazare Kaplan International Inc.
New York, New York


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8, No. 333-40225, No. 333-92077 and No. 333-52303) of
Lazare Kaplan International Inc. of our report dated August 11, 2005, relating
to the consolidated financial statements, which appear in the Annual
Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated August 11, 2005 relating to the financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, NY
August 22, 2005