alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6480 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work boots for women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2010 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work boots for 

women. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK BOOTS FOR WOMEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6480 IH

‘‘ 9902.64.01 Work footwear for women 

with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, incorporating a protective toe 

cap of materials other 

than metal, covering the 

ankle to a height greater 

than 6′′ (provided for in 

subheading 

6403.91.90.15) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2012 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Plain Language Writer’s Checklist 

Document Title: 

Agency/Division: 

Author: 

Date: 

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is committed to improving our service by writing in 

plain language. Plain writing must be used in any new or substantially revised document that: 

• Provides information about any of our services or benefits; 

• Is necessary to obtain any of our benefits or services; or, 

• Explains how to comply with a requirement that we administer or enforce. 

Below is a checklist for writers to use. Before beginning to write a document the writer should 

use this checklist to guide the style in which they write. This checklist covers identifying the 

audience of the given document, formatting and organization, word choice, and sentence 

structure. It is best to keep all documents clear, concise, and in the active voice. As you are 

drafting your document make your way through the checklist and check off each item when you 

have considered, included, and completed it within your document. 

Question Completed 

Audience Who are my readers 

What do my readers need to know 

Organization How can I present the information logically 

Is the purpose of this document clear for the reader 

Does the most important information come first 

Can the reader quickly and easily find what they are 

looking for 

Have I used headings, subheadings, lists and charts 

Words Have I written directly to my audience using ‘I’, ‘we’, and 

‘you’ 

Have I defined unfamiliar terms and acronyms 

Have I avoided using jargon 

Sentences Have I written in the active NOT passive voice 

Have I written sentences with only one idea 

Have I avoided using double negatives 

For additional information and resources on the Plain Writing Act and using plain writing, you 

can visit www.plainwriting.gov or www.usda.gov/plain-writing.
# Report

# Parameters
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

GUELMER RENDON 

NOTICE OP THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION 

OP AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

100 CHURCH, LLC, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 4510 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC Co. LLC 

f/k/a WFP Tower A Co. L.P., and Brookfield Properties One WFC G.P. Corp. flWa WFP 

Tower A Co. GP Corp. (collectively the "Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses 

to the allegationset forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related 

to the Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield 

Parties' Amended Answer to Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed 

in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each of them, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October ]8 2007 

Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee, LLP 

y: ~illiam J. SmiSH~US;9137) 

ttorn&ys for the Brookfield Parties 

~o I~C~ctor Street, 20th: Fiber 

Ne'3dYork, NY 10006 

(212) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-04510-AKH Document 23 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6397 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6397

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2010

                                Received

                           December 22, 2010

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend section 101(a)(35) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
provide for a marriage for which the parties are not physically in the 
presence of each other due to service abroad in the Armed Forces of the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marine Sergeant Michael H. Ferschke, 
Jr. Memorial Act''.

SEC. 2. MILITARY MARRIAGES LACKING PHYSICAL PRESENCE.

    Section 101(a)(35) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)(35)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end 
``(except for failure to consummate the marriage caused by physical 
separation due to the service abroad of one of the contracting parties 
in an active-duty status in the Armed Forces of the United States)''.

SEC. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH PAYGO.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the

              

House of Representatives, provided that such statement has been 
submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 21
 EXHIBIT 21
  Checkpoint Systems S.A.
    
    ArgentinaCheckpoint Systems (AUST/NZ) Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaMeto Australia Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaCheckpoint Systems Bangladesh Ltd.
    
    BangladeshActron Belgium and Luxembourg N.V.
    
    BelgiumCheckpoint Belgium N.V.
    
    BelgiumCheckpoint Europe N.V.
    
    BelgiumCheckpoint Systems Benelux B.V.
    
    BelgiumD & D Security, N.V.
    
    BelgiumMeto N.V.
    
    BelgiumCheckpoint do Brasil Ltda.
    
    BrazilCheckpoint Canada ULC
    
    CanadaCheckpoint Caribbean, Ltd
    
    Cayman IslandCheckpoint Commercial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
    
    ChinaCheckpoint Systems (ZJG) Co.,Ltd
    
    ChinaShanghai Asialco Electronics Co. Ltd
    
    ChinaSidep Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaCheckpoint Systems Danmark A/S
    
    DenmarkCheckpoint
Systems Finland Oy
    
    FinlandCheckpoint Systems France S.A.S.
    
    FranceCheckpoint Solutions GmbH
    
    GermanyCheckpoint Systems Europe GmbH
    
    GermanyCheckpoint Systems GmbH
    
    GermanyCheckpoint Systems Holding GmbH
    
    GermanyCheckpoint Systems International GmbH
    
    GermanyAsange Limited
    
    Hong KongAshanko Limited
    
    Hong KongCheckpoint Labelling Services HK Limited
    
    Hong KongCheckpoint Systems Hong Kong Ltd.
    
    Hong KongInvizion Limited
    
    Hong KongCheckpoint Checknet India Pvt Ltd
    
    IndiaCheckpoint Systems India Private Limited
    
    IndiaOATSystems Private Limited
    
    IndiaOATSystems Software India Private Limited
    
    IndiaCheckpoint Systems Italia S.p.A.
    
    ItalyCheckpoint Manufacturing Japan Co.,Ltd
    
    JapanCheckpoint Systems Japan Co., Ltd
    
    JapanCheckpoint Systems (M) Sdn Bhd
    
    MalaysiaCheckpoint Systems Sales (M) Sdn Bhd
    
    MalaysiaCheckpoint de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoCheckpoint Holland Holding B.V.
    
    NetherlandsCheckpoint Systems Benelux B.V.
    
    NetherlandsCP International Systems CV
    
    NetherlandsKimball Systems B.V.
    
    NetherlandsCheckpoint Limited
    
    New ZealandCheckpoint Systems Norge as.
    
    NorwayCheckpoint Systems (CEE) Spokia z.o.o.
    
    PolandCheckpoint Portugal Sistemas Anti-Furto S.A.
    
    PortugalCheckpoint Systems (SK) S.R.O.
    
    Slovak RepublicCheckpoint Systems Espana S.A.
    
    Spain




---



##### 



Checkpoint Systems Sverige AB
    
    SwedenTurn-O-Matic International AB
    
    SwedenCheckpoint System AG
    
    SwitzerlandCheckpoint Checknet Etiket Limited Sirketi
    
    TurkeyActron U.K. Ltd.
    
    United KingdomADS (United Kingdom) Ltd
    
    United KingdomADS UK Ltd
    
    United KingdomADS Solutions Limited
    
    United KingdomADS Worldwide Limited
    
    United KingdomAvenue Data Systems Ltd.
    
    United KingdomCheckpoint Systems (UK) Ltd
    
    United KingdomEvagard Ltd
    
    United KingdomMeto U.K. Ltd.
    
    United KingdomOAT System UK Ltd
    
    United KingdomCheckpoint
International LLC
    
    United StatesOATSystems, Inc.
    
    United States
No. 76-6033.

#### Monin *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**87 CAF 10-02452**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ALLISON E. NOON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V ORDER
BENJAMIN E. NOON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
TIMOTHY A. BENEDICT, ROME, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
JOHN P. AMUSO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, CLINTON, FOR ROBERT N. AND PEYTON N.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Louis P. Gigliotti, A.J.), entered November 24, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the violation and modification petitions. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation withdrawing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on December 13 and 19, 2011 and by the Attorney for the Children on December 16, 2011, It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: February 10, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Annual Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jackson Y. Dott, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/   Jackson Y. Dott
----------------------------
Jackson Y. Dott
Chief Executive Officer
July 29, 2003
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | This                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                May 1, 2007 | /s/David                E. Fountain    |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                              | David                E. Fountain       |
|                              | Chief                Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
                                     

                                  EXHIBIT 27
                                       
                            FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
<LEGEND>                                       
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet for the period ended December 31, 1995 and the 
related statements of income, cash flows and retained earnings for the period 
ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                     Dec-31-1995
<CASH>                               711,000
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      7,682,000
<ALLOWANCES>                         107,000
<INVENTORY>                       13,445,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  22,049,000
<PP&E>                            33,001,000
<DEPRECIATION>                    18,387,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    38,761,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              7,102,000
<BONDS>                                3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                             164,000
<OTHER-SE>                        28,220,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      38,761,000
<SALES>                           45,760,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  45,760,000
<CGS>                             23,271,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     23,271,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   348,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    5,834,000
<INCOME-TAX>                       1,571,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                4,263,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       4,263,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.26

        

</TABLE>
# CE2010212EN.01016901.xml

| 5.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 212/169 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 212/169

---

Tuesday 5 May 2009Trade in seal products ***I

P6_TA(2009)0342

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 May 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning trade in seals products (COM(2008)0469 – C6-0295/2008 – 2008/0160(COD))

2010/C 212 E/30

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0469),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 95 and 133 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0295/2008),

having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis,

having regard to its declaration on banning seal products in the European Union (1),

1

having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 24 April 2009 to adopt the proposal as amended, in accordance with the first indent of the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rules 51 and 35 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A6-0118/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006, p. 194.

1

---

Tuesday 5 May 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0160

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 5 May 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on trade in seal products

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009.)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          29,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,485
<PP&E>                                       2,929,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,033,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,508
<BONDS>                                      1,129,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,742,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,033,106
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,570
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        

</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 12

- 00167

- CR

ALAN MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 241st District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. 241

- 0867

- 12

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION In Smith County, Texas, Alan Michael Rodriguez was indicted on one count of engaging in organized criminal activity. Rodriguez entered an open plea of guilty. The trial court, after hearing argument regarding punishment, assessed a sentence of thirty

- seven years ’ confinement.
The trial cou rt ordered Rodriguez to pay court costs of $574 .00 , which included $300 .00 for attorney ’ s fees. On appeal, Rodriguez argues that the trial court erred in assessing attorney ’ s fees because he was indigent. To its credit, the State agrees with Rodriguez. Article 26.05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that the costs of appointed counsel may be imposed against a defendant if the court finds that the defendant “ has
financial resources that ena ble him to offset in part or in whole the costs of the legal services provided. ” T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art 26.05(g) (West Supp. 2012) . Where the record fails to establish and support a defendant ’ s financial ability, a trial court errs if it orders t he reimbursement of attorney ’ s fees. Mayer v. State , 309 S.W.3d 5 5 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).3 Because he was indigent, the trial court appointed counsel for Rodriguez. The record does not reflect a change in Rodriguez ’ s indigent status. There is also n o evidence in the record of Rodriguez ’ s ability to pay any or all of the costs for his appointed counsel. Therefore, the trial court erred in assessing $574.00 in costs, and we modify the judgment to correctly reflect a total of $274.00 in court costs. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2(b). We affirm the judgment, as modified.

Jack Carter Justice
Date Submitted: January 30, 2013 Date Decided: January 31, 2013
Do Not Publish

1 Rodriguez remains liable for other administrative costs incurred. Williams v. State , 332 S.W.3d 694, 700 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2001, pet

. denied).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RAIT Financial Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott F. Schaeffer, Chief Executive Officer and President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Scott F. Schaeffer            
|Scott F. Schaeffer                   
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|Date: November 9, 2009