alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Alan L. Wells, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                                                                                 
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 26, 2010 |  | /s/    ALAN L.
WELLS                                                                                                            
|                        |  | Alan L. Wells President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Principal Executive
Officer Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.
**Exhibit 31**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John B. Furman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GameTech International, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; and
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report.
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 14, 2005    /S/ John B. Furman   John B. Furman Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6225 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to terminate 

authority under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 

Mr. PAULSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 

2008 to terminate authority under the Troubled Asset 

Relief Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent End to 

5 TARP Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF TARP AUTHORITY. 

7 Section 120 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization 

8 Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5230) is amended to read as fol9 lows: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6225 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 120. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The authorities provided under 

3 sections 101(a), excluding section 101(a)(3), and the au4 thorities provided under section 102 shall terminate on 

5 October 3, 2010. 

6 ‘‘(b) TREATMENT OF UNFUNDED COMMITMENTS.— 

7 With respect to a commitment to purchase made by the 

8 Secretary under this title, including with respect to any 

9 housing assistance pursuant to section 109 or 110, the 

10 Secretary may not expend funds with respect to such com11 mitment on or after October 3, 2010.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
### ilK^WocUJLevv M W*V VeV*i ^received IN V • N/ JUL 312015 ^o^^ee J\ v«^v^ AbelAeosia, Clerk ^e. owe, vW. fcf V**K cV&ir^ Sto d^t- 9^ c^ wx^kyvW"
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 08-17 

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R 

Miscellaneous Order No. 17-16 is hereby revoked. 

DATED: August 30, 2017 BY THE COURT: 

ROBERT N. DAVIS 

Chief Judge
# CE2010184EN.01013901.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/139 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/139

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Accession of the EC to UNECE Regulation No 61 on uniform provisions for the approval of commercial vehicles ***

P6_TA(2009)0219

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the accession of the European Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No 61 on uniform provisions for the approval of commercial vehicles with regard to their external projections forward of the cab's rear panel (COM(2008)0675 – 7240/2009 - C6-0119/2009 – 2008/0205(AVC))

2010/C 184 E/33

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2008)0675 - 7240/2009),

having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 4(2), second indent, of Council Decision 97/836/EC (C6-0119/2009) (1),

1

having regard to Rules 75(1) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A6-0243/2009),

| 1. | Gives its assent to the proposal for a Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its assent to the proposal for a Council decision;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  Council Decision of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (‘Revised 1958 Agreement’) (OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 27, 1998 TO JUNE 30, 1998
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         9,120,689
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             143,769,089
<CASH>                                       9,345,575
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          25,909,073
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             179,181,178
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            109,281,481
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             30,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,790
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,197,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               179,181,178
<PREMIUMS>                                 120,833,950
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          6,191,023
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                 112,567,176
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         7,672,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,607,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,607,262
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,607,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Douglas A. McIntyre, the
chairman, president, and chief executive officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

      (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                        By: /s/ Douglas A. McIntyre
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                    Douglas A. McIntyre
                                                  Chairman, President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  On2 Technologies, Inc.

October 31, 2005


                                      -27-
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA, Dated

March 21, 2018,

______________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

DOE

,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 50321

D.C. No. 2:18

- cm

- 00771

- UA

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 4, 2018

Pasadena, California

Before: D.W. NELSON and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and PRATT, ** District

Judge.

Doe appeals the district court ’s order holding her in civil contempt for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, Unite d States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

DEC 28 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

refusing to produce records of her foreign bank ac tivity for the years 2011 thro ugh

2016 as sought by a federal grand jury subpoena duces tecum

. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Doe asserts that the spousal testimonial privilege protects her from

producing document s responsive to the subpoena because the gra nd jury is

currently investigating possible federal tax crimes committed by her husband. 1 For

the spousal testimonial privilege to apply, “the anticipated testimony ‘[must] in

fact be adverse’ to the nonwitness spouse.” United States v. Van Cauwenberghe

,

827 F.2d 424, 431 (9 th Cir. 1987) (citation omitted) ; see also United States v.

Fomichev , 899 F.3d 766, 771 (9 th Cir. 2018) (“[T]he witness

- spouse alone has a

privilege to refuse to testify adversely .”) (emphasis added) (citation omitted)

.

Here, “the testimonial aspect of [Doe’s] response to a subpoena duces tecum does

nothing more than establish the existence, authenticity, and custody” of any

responsive foreign bank account records. United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27,

4 0

– 4 1 (2000). Because this bare testimonial aspect of Doe’s act of production

does not itself adversely affect her husband ’s case

, Doe is not relieved of her

obligation to produce foreign bank account records over which she has care,

1 Although Doe also raised claim s of privilege under the Fifth Amendment, and the

marital communications privilege

, before the district court, these arguments were

not raised on appeal and are therefore waived. Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045,

1052 ( 9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its open ing

brief are deemed waived.”)

.3

custody, or control

.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 24(c)

                     Power of Attorney for James V. Pickett


         Know all men by these presents that the undersigned director or
officer of Metatec Corporation, a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby
constitutes and appoints Jeffrey M. Wilkins and William H. Largent, and each of
them (with full power to each of them to act along), as my true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for me and in my name, place, and stead, in my capacity as director or officer
of the Company, to execute the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Company's
fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, for each fiscal year thereafter, and any
amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could
do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact
and agents or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         The undersigned director or officer of the Company has executed and
delivered this Power of Attorney on March 21, 1996.



/s/James V. Pickett                        Director
-------------------------------            --------------------------------
Signature                                  Position(s) with the Company


James V. Pickett                                   
-------------------------------
Print Name
Priority

1=Law/reg/directive

2=Mission-critical and/or 

time-sensitive

3=Frequently requested

4=Other

(Some inventory items 

may fall into more than 

one priority. Assign them 

the highest priority. )

Audience(s)

(May select >1)

All

Agribusiness

Conservationists

Consumers

Cooperatives

Educators/Students

Landowners

Media

Parents/Caregivers

Producers

Researchers

Rural Communities

USDA Employees

Subject Area(s)

(May select >1)

All

AG=Agriculture

EO=Education/Outreach

FN=Food/Nutrition

LR=Laws/Regulations

MT=Marketing/Trade

NRE=Natural Resources/Environment

RS=Research/Science

RCD=Rural/Community Development

TR=Travel/Recreation

UER=USDA Employee Resources

Content Description

(Include why it was selected for inclusion and any 

site analytics or audience feedback/usability 

results.)

Content Status

A=Available on site

I=In Process

P=Planned

N/A=Not applicable

1 All All Agency reports and plans, including 

Strategic Plans, Annual and Performance Reports, FAIR Act reporting, and “NO FEAR” 

Act reports

A 

1 All All Mandated data development, analysis, and 

dissemination efforts (i.e. farm income estimates, biennial NAFTA report, twice a yeaaquaculture report, and publication of meat scanner data)

A 

2 Media All Press information, including press releases 

and research summaries

A 

2 All All Economic research analyses and policy 

studies on farm, food, natural resource, and rural issues, conducted in accordance with widely accepted research practice in the United States

A 

2 All All Grant and contract funding information 

related to program activities

A 

2 All All Statistical information, disseminated in 

connection with and as a byproduct of the administration of research and evaluation programs

A 

3 All All Economic/social science education 

materials for researchers and students

A 
3 All All Computer software supporting data 

reporting tools and/or report dissemination

A 

4 All All Reports to Congress as required by statute A 

4 All All Program evaluation studies undertaken to 

assess program activities and identify opportunities for improvemen

A 

4 All All General agency information, such as 

mission and function statements, research emphases, other programmatic and administrative information, staff biographies, staff directories, etc.

A
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1838. DAVID BRELAND v. THE STATE.

In 1997,DavidBreland was convicted of murder. The Supreme Court affirmed

Breland’s conviction on direct appeal. Breland v. State, 269 Ga. 834 (504 SE2d 193)

(1998). In 2017, Breland filed a motion to set aside an illegal and void judgment,

which the trial court dismissed. Breland then filed this direct appeal.

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be

imposed for the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See

OCGA § 16-5-1 (a), (e) (1); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012)

(Hunstein, C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (1) (322 SE2d

711) (1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a sentence of

death or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of murder”). 

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 03, 2018

07/03/2018
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

           CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2005 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.


                                             By: /s/George W. Off
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name:   George W. Off
                                             Title:  Chairman of the Board,
                                                     President and Chief
                                                     Executive Officer


                                             By: /s/ W. Craig Burns
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name:   W. Craig Burns
                                             Title:  Executive Vice President,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer and
                                                     Treasurer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies
the Report and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of the Report.



Date: March 9, 2006