alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99

                                    ITSA LTD.
                c/o ITSA-Intercontinental Telecomunicacoes Ltda.
                               SCS, Quadra 07-Bl.A
                        Ed. Torre Patio Brazil, sala 601
                             70.307-911 Brasilia-DF
                                     Brazil


               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                  April 1, 2002




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, ITSA Ltd. has
obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen S.C. ("Andersen")
stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their quality control
system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional
standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working
on the audit, availability of U.S. national office consultation and availability
of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the audit.

                                              Very truly yours,

                                              ITSA Ltd.

                                                 /s/ Hermano Albuquerque

                                              Hermano Albuquerque
                                              Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                             410
<SECURITIES>                                        87
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10972
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         56
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           21491
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                           9898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              576
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5616
<OTHER-SE>                                        4073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32295
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    690
<INCOME-TAX>                                       218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GameTech International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Hewitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/JOHN P. HEWITTJohn P. Hewitt
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|March 14, 2003                                          |  | 
|                                                        |  | 

---

QuickLinks
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 731 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exclude individuals who have 

been convicted of committing certain sex offenses from receiving certain 

burial-related benefits and funeral honors which are otherwise available 

to certain veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and related individuals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2009 

Mr. SHADEGG (for himself, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. CHILDERS, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. HELLER, and Mr. LATTA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exclude individuals 

who have been convicted of committing certain sex offenses from receiving certain burial-related benefits and 

funeral honors which are otherwise available to certain 

veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and related 

individuals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Jenny’s Law’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 731 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF COMMIT2 TING CERTAIN SEX OFFENSES FROM RECEIV3 ING CERTAIN BURIAL-RELATED BENEFITS 

4 AND FUNERAL HONORS. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION AGAINST INTERMENT OR MEMORI6 ALIZATION IN NATIONAL CEMETERY ADMINISTRATION, 

7 ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY, AND CERTAIN STATE

8 VETERANS’ CEMETERIES; PROHIBITION AGAINST PROVI9 SION OF PRESIDENTIAL MEMORIAL CERTIFICATE, FLAG, 

10 AND HEADSTONE OR MARKER.—Section 2411(b) of title 

11 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

12 the following new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(4) A person who is classified as a tier III sex 

14 offender under the Sex Offender Registration and 

15 Notification Act.’’. 

16 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

17 shall be construed to terminate any benefit available to 

18 any person except those benefits specifically terminated by 

19 the amendment made by subsection (a). 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to interments and 

22 memorializations that occur on or after the date of the 

23 enactment of this Act. 

24 SEC. 3. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. 

25 The constitutional authority on which this Act rests 

26 is the power of Congress to make rules for the government 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 731 IH

1 and regulation of the land and naval forces, as enumerated 

2 in article I, section 8, clause 14 of the United States Con3 stitution. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF PRINTPACK, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 24, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-24-2000
<CASH>                                             870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                       749
<INVENTORY>                                     84,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,805
<PP&E>                                         646,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                 337,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 552,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,329
<BONDS>                                        399,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,011
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,644)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   552,877
<SALES>                                        906,539
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               906,539
<CGS>                                          766,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  766,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   403
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,533
<INCOME-TAX>                                       447
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,086
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Miles, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Fertig, J.), rendered February 26, 1986, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*678The certificate of release on parole and the certificate of final discharge were properly admitted into evidence pursuant to CPLR 4518 (c), and thus the defendant was properly adjudicated a second felony offender.

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit *(see, People v Orr,*57 AD2d 578). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 2877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[I.D.010801C]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: NOAA's Teacher-At-Sea Program.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0283.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 309.
    Number of Respondents: 375.
    Average Hours Per Response: 75 minutes for an application, 15 
minutes for recommendations, 2 hours per report.
    Needs and Uses: The Teacher-At-Sea Program provides educators with 
the opportunity to participate in research projects aboard NOAA 
vessels. The respondents are educators who provide information about 
themselves and their teaching situation and who submit a follow-up 
report with ideas for classroom applications. Recommendations are also 
required.
    Affected Public: Individuals and households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Madeleine Clayton, Departmental Forms Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-3129, Department of Commerce, Room 6086, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cd1dff0fde5e8f3f2dcf8f3ffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="501d133c3129243f3e10343f337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: January 5, 2001.
Madeleine Clayton,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-1065 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
; ,;**·~~** ... 

### "_..)r:? 

## c t**~-{''**



## , fYI 

# v · na. ·rY) 

# e l f'l 

## c 

## c, \('' r_. 

# e 'JP·c' l.. i"-!.,,.J ''""! • .,,,

..... . . l

. -''\ \.;; ""-·""" " \,...,**-~** ""' 

## S' 

# e**~'** o( Y"Y1 

### e Cl

## ;"~ 

# ' ) e d**~;J.~1** \\: 

### 'f\' \(' 

## \J {;J ""'"'· "r I 1 \\**-~.,.,.** '·· t**\)(j,~\_,!'** \1 ·p"\**(~** 

### t Y\ 

### r 

# e 

# c e \\It.· 

# cA**~ (~[\** **c~** ('\ \ 

# e c\

" 

# -"

- .\;,. \ 

## doc.k.e b 

### C. f) \_,,l 'f· 

### t ·**\t;;;~** 

### \.**-~** 'f
17 

### shee.t
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, each of the undersigned officers of Makita Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify that, to such officers knowledge:  1.
    
    The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31,
2005(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Makita CorporationBy:
    /s/ Masahiko GotoName:
    Masahiko GotoTitle:
    President and Representative Director Date: July 5, 2005 Makita CorporationBy:
    /s/ Kenichiro NakaiName:
    Kenichiro NakaiTitle:
    Director, General Manager of AdministrationHeadquarters Date: July 5, 2005
#### PEOPLE ex rel. EQUITABLE GAS CO. v. BARKER et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

April 13, 1894.)

Order affirmed, without costs.

Opinion by VAN BRUNT, P. J. The opinion in this case was withdrawn.
#### PHINNEY *v.*SHEPPARD, &c., HOSPITAL TRUSTEES.

ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OE THE STATE OP MARYLAND.

No. 392.

Submitted March 19, 1900.

Decided April 9, 1900.

Dismissed on the authorities cited.

This was a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

*Mr. William Pinkney White, Mr. George R. Willis*and *Mr. Francis T. Homer*for the motion.

*Mr. Abner McKinley*and *Mr. E. J. D. Cross*opposing.

The Chiee Justice:

Cause reported in state court, 88 Maryland, 633. Writ of error dismissed on the authority of *Williams*v. *Eggleston,*170 U. S. 304, 309; *Hamblin*v. *Western Land Company,*147 U. S. 531; *Wilson*v. *North Carolina,*169 U. S. 586, 595.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PAUL AARONS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1550

[August 2, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael I. Rothschild, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 90-17084 CF10A.

Paul Aarons, Defuniak Springs, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Henry Swain, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of DVL, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


/s/ Henry Swain
----------------------------
Henry Swain
Chief Financial Officer
March 23, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

        I, Robert A. Reynolds, Jr., President and Principal Executive Officer of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 8, 2011

 

 

----
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00133-CR

Anthony FOSTER,

Appellant

v.

STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CR-6089

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2009

DISMISSED

The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX.R.APP. P.25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d)

provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of

appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX.R.APP. P.25.2(d). Accordingly,

on March 23, 2009, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to

Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal
04-09-00133-CR

-2-

was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2003, order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.

On March 24, 2009, defendant’s appellate counsel filed a letter stating “this court has no

choice but to dismissthe appeal.” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s counsel

that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
# NFIRS 4.1 Codes
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 33 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 9 of 9
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6043
LEE GADSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. GLENN ALEWINE; WERNER BECK, MD; CHARLES RUSHING, MD; EDSEL T. TAYLOR, Warden; PATRICIA MCINTOSH, RN; RANDY BLACKMON, Sheriff; MIKE PEEPLES, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-4066-2-17AJ) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lee Gadson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen P. Hughes, HOWELL, GIBSON & HUGHES, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina; obert Waller Achurch III, HOWELL, GIBSON & BONEY, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina; WilliamHenry Davidson II, James Miller Davis, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gadson v. Alewine , No. CA95-4066-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED