alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-4852

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES E. GOODE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cr-00262) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 23, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl J. Roncaglione, Jr., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Lisa G. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Goode’s offense was committed in October 2003. The 2002 Guidelines Manual was applied to avoid ex post facto issues. - 2 - PER CURIAM: James E. Goode pled guilty to receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) (2000), and was sentenced to the mandatory minimum term of five years imprisonment. The court also imposed a ten-year term of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(k) (West Supp. 2007). Goode appeals his sentence on the ground that the advisory guideline range was incorrectly calculated. We affirm. The district court adopted the guideline calculation set out in the presentence report, overruling Goode’s objections and finding that the guideline range would have been 37-46 months, but was increased to the statutory minimum term of 60 months under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.1(b) (2002). * Goode does not dispute that he was su bject to t he 60-month minimum term or that the guideline range was 60 months pursuant to § 5G1.2(b). He contends that the court should have applied USSG § 2G2.4 (possession of child pornography) instead of § 2G2.2 (trafficking in child pornography), and erred in making an enhancement for distribution under subsection (b)(2)(E). Both issues pertain only to the initial computation of the guideline range before the application of § 5G1.1(b). We conclude that the district court correctly determined that Goode’s guideline range was 60 months and- 3 - sentenced him accordingly. We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6428 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6428

 To exclude from gross income compensation provided by Pacific Gas and 
   Electric Company for victims of the natural gas transmission line 
     explosion occurring in San Bruno, California, and to treat as 
 nontaxable any gain from the involuntary conversion of their property 
as the result of such explosion, without regard to the rules requiring 
                conversion to property of a similar use.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2010

  Ms. Speier introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exclude from gross income compensation provided by Pacific Gas and 
   Electric Company for victims of the natural gas transmission line 
     explosion occurring in San Bruno, California, and to treat as 
 nontaxable any gain from the involuntary conversion of their property 
as the result of such explosion, without regard to the rules requiring 
                conversion to property of a similar use.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``San Bruno Victims Compensation 
Fairness Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION LINE EXPLOSION COMPENSATION EXCLUDED 
              FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986--
            (1) the natural gas transmission line explosion on 
        September 9, 2010, in San Bruno, California, shall be treated 
        as a qualified disaster under section 139(c) of such Code, and
            (2) any compensation provided by Pacific Gas and Electric 
        Company to a victim of such disaster shall be treated as a 
        qualified disaster relief payment under section 139 of such 
        Code.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply to amounts received 
on or after September 9, 2010.

SEC. 3. GAIN FROM CONVERSION OF PROPERTY EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--In the case of any gain from the compulsory or 
involuntary conversion of property as the result of its destruction, in 
whole or in part, by the natural gas explosion described in section 
1(1)--
            (1) section 1033 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall 
        not apply with respect to such gain, and
            (2) such gain shall not be included in gross income for 
        purposes of such Code.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply to compulsory or 
involuntary conversions on or after September 9, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
##### In this section

              - Codes and standards (5)
              - CRR (10)
              - Events (4)
              - Leadership (8)
              - Wildfire and WUI (16)
              - Planning (11)
              - Data (8)
              - EMS (16)
              - Equipment and technology (17)
              - Fire investigation (6)
              - Funding (5)
              - Hazmat (14)
              - Health and safety (38)
              - Terrorism (4)
              - Training (6)

Infogram

- CRR
Learn to take C.H.A.R.G.E. of battery safety

Current Issues

- CRR
- Wildfire and WUI
Include everyone in wildfire safety and prevention efforts

Infogram

- CRR
- Data
- Health and safety
Tool for accessing data on fire risk and vulnerability

Current Issues

- CRR
- Health and safety
- Wildfire and WUI
Minimizing the effects of wildfire smoke

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
America Burning: 50 years of fire safety and prevention

Current Issues

- CRR
- Planning
Sustainable energy and conservation solutions for fire departments

Current Issues

- CRR
- Wildfire and WUI
Fire protection engineers: Key players in solving the wildland urban interface fire problem

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
EMR - ISAC: Making vital, timely, actionable emergency services sector information easily accessible

Current Issues

- CRR
- Wildfire and WUI
Protecting structures from wildfire embers and fire exposures

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
Protecting people who live or work in high-rises
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,196)
<INVENTORY>                                     24,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,112
<PP&E>                                         190,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,265
<BONDS>                                        323,522
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (94,665)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,823
<SALES>                                        126,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,030
<CGS>                                          112,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,020
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,510)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (199)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,281)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Topical Fire Report Series

At a Glance

December 2021 | Volume 21, Issue 9

Nonresidential Building Fires (2017-2019)

Each year, from 2017 

to 2019, an estimated 

average of

108,500

nonresidential 

building fires

were reported to fire 

departments in the 

United States.

These fires caused an estimated annual average of:

90

deaths

1,125

injuries in property loss

20%

National estimates for 2017 to 

2019 show that nonresidential 

buildings accounted for 20% of the 

total dollar loss from all fires.

Outside and

special 

properties

accounted for the most 

nonresidential building fires 

(25%)

2

7

Nonresidential building fires 

occurred most frequently from 

2 to 7 p.m.

Cooking was the leading cause 

of all nonresidential building 

fires (30%).

Nonconfined nonresidential 

building fires most often started 

in vehicle storage areas (8%).

58

I n 5 8 % o f n o n c o n f i n e d 

nonresidential building fires, the 

fire extended beyond the room 

of origin.

The U.S. Fire Administration’s (USFA’s) topical reports are designed to explore facets of the U.S. fire problem as depicted through data collected in the 

USFA’s National Fire Incident Reporting System from incidents reported by local response agencies. Each topical report briefly addresses the nature of 

the specific fire or fire-related topic, highlights important findings from the data, and may suggest other resources to consider for further information.

To read the full report, visit usfa.fema.gov.

National Fire Data Center

16825 S. Seton Ave.

Emmitsburg, MD 21727

usfa.fema.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Nonqualified Stock Option Plan of IMCO Recycling Inc. (Form
S-8 No. 33-26641), the IMCO Recycling Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-34745), the IMCO Recycling Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-76780, 333-00075, and 333-71339), the IMCO Recycling Inc.
Annual Incentive Program (Form S-8 Nos. 333-07091 and 333-71335), the IMCO
Recycling Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-81949), and the
2000 Restricted Stock Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-55962) of our report dated February
12, 2001, with respect to the financial statements of IMCO Recycling included in
the Annual Report (10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

March 20, 2001
Dallas, Texas
Department of Agriculture 

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Quarterly Report 

Fiscal Year 2022, Quarter 3 

Agency / Component 

Number of 

Requests 

Received 

Number of 

Requests Processed 

Number of 

Requests 

Backlogged 

AMS 42 48 54 

APHIS 310 282 449 

DA/OSEC 85 75 107 

FAS 13 10 31 

FNS 81 187 331 

FS 413 381 743 

FSA 1661 1625 98 

FSIS 61 97 166 

NRCS 66 72 12 

OASCR 3 2 17 

OBPA 3 1 1 

OCFO 13 8 4 

OGC 14 15 20 

OHA 9 11 0 

OIG 24 47 46 

RD 96 108 54 

REE 35 29 21 

RMA 14 16 1 

AGENCY OVERALL 2943 3014 2155
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 15
                                                                      ----------



           LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION



R&B Falcon Corporation



We are aware that R&B Falcon Corporation has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements No. 333-43475, 333-67755,  333-67757,  333-68101,  333-
81179,  333-81181,  333-81381,  333-88839,  333-88841,  333-88843, 333-42886,
and 333-39500, it's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, which
includes our report dated October 25, 2000 covering the unaudited interim
financial information contained therein.  Pursuant to Regulation C of the
Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration
statements prepared or certified by our Firm or a report prepared or certified
by our Firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



Arthur Andersen LLP

Houston, Texas
November 7, 2000
# The Transition to Advanced Encryption Standard

**Posted: Nov. 2, 2023**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Health and safety
            - Leadership

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

The Federal Partnership for Interoperable Communications (FPIC) has released “Transition to Advanced Encryption Standard (AES),” a white paper to be used by public safety agencies to better understand the vulnerabilities to sensitive information from continued use of the Data Encryption Standard and nonstandard algorithms. It provides:
            - An overview of actions and next steps being taken to support state, local, tribal and territorial agencies in the transition to AES capabilities.
            - Background information on the Criminal Justice Information Service (CJIS) Policy and the Protected Critical Infrastructure Information (PCII) Program.
            - Background information about CJIS policies and resources, like the PCII Program, to better protect critical infrastructure and information.

The FPIC is a Technical Advisory Resource to the Emergency Communications Preparedness Center Steering Committee and has a collaborative relationship with the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency’s SAFECOM-National Council of Statewide Interoperability Coordinators Joint Technology Policy Committee.

The FPIC’s mission is to address communications interoperability among the public safety community at all levels of government to foster intergovernmental cooperation and identify and leverage common synergies. More about FPIC, Encryption in P25, and the P25, can be found at https://www.cisa.gov/safecom/fpic.

This article is based on content in theNov. 2, 2023 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Emile J. Jordan certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OraLabs Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Acts Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.


Dated November 16, 2004                                  /S/ Emile J. Jordan
                                                      --------------------------
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       16
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6540 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6540

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 21, 2010

                                Received

                           December 22, 2010

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the Secretary of Defense, in awarding a contract for the KC-
X Aerial Refueling Aircraft Program, to consider any unfair competitive 
                 advantage that an offeror may possess.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense Level Playing Field Act''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN EVALUATION OF 
              OFFERS FOR KC-X AERIAL REFUELING AIRCRAFT PROGRAM.

    (a) Requirement To Consider Unfair Competitive Advantage.--In 
awarding a contract for the KC-X aerial refueling aircraft program (or 
any successor to that program), the Secretary of Defense shall, in 
evaluating any offers submitted to the Department of Defense in 
response to a solicitation for offers for such program, consider any 
unfair competitive advantage that an offeror may possess.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 60 days after submission of offers in 
response to any such solicitation, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on any unfair 
competitive advantage that any offeror may possess.
    (c) Requirement To Take Findings Into Account in Award of 
Contract.--In awarding a contract for the KC-X aerial refueling 
aircraft program (or any successor to that program), the Secretary of 
Defense shall take into account the findings of the report submitted 
under subsection (b).
    (d) Unfair Competitive Advantage.--In this section, the term 
``unfair competitive advantage'', with respect to an offer for a 
contract, means a situation in which the cost of development, 
production, or manufacturing is not fully borne by the offeror for such 
contract.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 21, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NATHAN RILEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 372 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
----

|   | (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /S/      Jay M. Meilstrup    |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Jay      M. Meilstrup                  |   |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer           |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| September  9,      2008      |   |   |

----