alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2010137EN.01006101.xml

| 27.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 137/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 137/61

---

Thursday 2 April 2009New types of costs eligible for a contribution from the ESF ***I

P6_TA(2009)0200

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 April 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund to extend the types of costs eligible for a contribution from the ESF (COM(2008)0813 – C6-0454/2008 – 2008/0232(COD))

2010/C 137 E/14

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0813),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 148 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0454/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Regional Development (A6-0116/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21



                         GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                              --------------------



Graybar International, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Financial Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Electric de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation

Graybar Electric Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation

Graybar Canada Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation

Graybar Foundation, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Services, Inc., an Illinois corporation

Distribution Associates, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Business Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Electric Canada Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation

Graybar Commerce Corporation, a Delaware corporation

Commonwealth Controls Corporation, a Missouri corporation
2023 Fire Stop Tour Tour

In late 2022, the USFA met with major fire service organizations across the country to ensure the mission supports the current needs of fire and EMS responders. The stakeholder listening sessions revealed several opportunities for the USFA to better connect with the fire service at large and become more relevant. The opportunities identified are incorporated into this strategic plan. The topics deemed most important to external stakeholders included the following:

- Leadership
- Communication and collaboration
- Relevance — modernize USFA
- Data and research

USFA leadership held a town hall with all staff to ensure internal stakeholder perspectives were addressed in the new strategic plan. Staff spent a full day committed to open discussion and small-group targeted discussions to arrive at the main drivers for the strategic plan. Many of these topics matched the external stakeholder group and included the following.

- Internal communication
- External communication
- Workforce
- Research and innovation
- Business processes/resources

Based on these internal and external sessions, the USFA Strategic Plan for 2024-2027 was developed.
#### *In re*MacHARG, Michael Patrick

(MR 21702)

Orlando, FL

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Michael Patrick MacHarg is censured.

Burke, J., took no part.
#### In the Matter of David Silberzweig and Neil Sznitken, Attorneys, Respondents. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

December 13, 1989

*2APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Robert H. Straus (Diana J. Szochet*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding the Special Referee sustained charges of professional misconduct alleging, *inter alia,*that the respondents withdrew interest earned on clients’ funds held in escrow accounts totaling $22,473.47 for their own personal use, that the respondents commingled client funds with funds belonging to the law firm, and that the respondents failed to maintain records pertaining to client funds entrusted to them, as required by 22 NYCRR 691.12.

The petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. The respondents’ position at the hearing before the Special Referee was that all of the interest earned on escrow funds was withdrawn from the escrow accounts with the knowledge, acquiescence and consent of each and every client as part of the client’s legal fee. While there is a paucity of legal precedent, we are of the opinion that escrow funds and any interest earned thereon are the exclusive property of the client.

After reviewing all the evidence, we are in agreement with the report of the Special Referee. The respondents are guilty *3of the misconduct outlined above. The petitioner’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee is granted.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed, we have taken into consideration the respondents’ cooperation throughout these proceedings as well as the lack of ample case law precedent or of a court rule regarding ownership of the interest earned on clients’ funds. Nevertheless, even without such precedent or rule, the respondents should have known not to use the interest which accrued on the clients’ escrow funds for their own use. Thus, the respondents are adjudged guilty of professional misconduct. Accordingly, the respondents are censured for their misconduct and are directed to make restitution of the interest to their clients.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the petitioner’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that David Silberzweig and Neil Sznitken are hereby censured for their professional misconduct; and it is further,

Ordered that David Silberzweig and Neil Sznitken make restitution of the interest to their clients and render an accounting of that restitution to this court within 60 days after service of this opinion and order upon them.
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of
Sunnyside Acres Mobile Estates (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the
standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: April 11, 2008           /s/ Hui Ping Cheng
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Hui Ping Cheng
                                President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6**  **848**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. ERIC JEVONNE BENNETT , Defendant

- Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 7 :08

- cr - 00146

- BR

- 1; 7:11

- cv - 00182

- BR )

Submitted : September 27, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Eric Jevonne Bennett , Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker , Assistant United States Attorney, William Ellis Boyle, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Jevonne Bennett appeal s the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifi cate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a de batable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bennett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 718 

To reinstate the Interim Management Strategy governing off-road vehicle 

use in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina, pending 

the issuance of a final rule for off-road vehicle use by the National 

Park Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2009 

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reinstate the Interim Management Strategy governing 

off-road vehicle use in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina, pending the issuance of a final 

rule for off-road vehicle use by the National Park Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF INTERIM MANAGEMENT 

4 STRATEGY. 

5 After the date of the enactment of this Act, Cape 

6 Hatteras National Seashore shall be managed in accordVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:21 Jan 29, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H718.IH H718

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 718 IH

1 ance with the Interim Protected Species Management 

2 Strategy/Environmental Assessment issued by the Na3 tional Park Service on June 13, 2007, for the Cape Hat4 teras National Seashore, North Carolina, until the Na5 tional Park Service issues a special regulation and long6 term off-road vehicle management plan for the use of Cape 

7 Hatteras National Seashore by the public. 

8 SEC. 2. INAPPLICABILITY OF CONSENT DECREE. 

9 The April 30, 2008, consent decree filed in the 

10 United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

11 North Carolina regarding off-road vehicle use at Cape 

12 Hatteras National Seashore in North Carolina shall not 

13 apply after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

July 26, 2024

CR-2023-0473

Ledell Tavari Jackson v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court: 

CC-20-338) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on July 26, 2024, the following action was taken 

in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
- Home

# Arrest Summary Report

**United States Capitol Police Arrest Summary Report*To request a public document, contact the USCP Reports Processing Section at (202) 228-4585.***

USCP Report Request Form 2019.pdf

- First page« First
- Previous page‹ Previous
- …
-               Page            115
-               Page            116
-               Page            117
-               Page            118
-               Page            119
-               Page            120
-               Page            121
-               Page            122
-               Current page            123

## Media Center

              - Press Releases
              - USCP Arrests
              - USCP FAST FACTS

## Glossary

                - R/O = Reporting/Responding Officer
                - SFST = Standardized Field Sobriety Test
                - W = Witness
                - S = Suspect
                - SA = Special Agent
                - CIS = Criminal Investigations Section
                - CSS = Crime Scene Search
                - C = Complainant
                - LPR = License Plate Number
                - CFN = Capitol File Number
                - Unless otherwise noted, Defendants placed under arrest are transported to USCP Headquarters, 119 D Street, NE, for processing.
Department of Agriculture 

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Quarterly Report 

Fiscal Year 2021, Quarter 4 

Agency / Component 

Number of 

Requests 

Received 

Number of 

Requests 

Processed 

Number of 

Requests 

Backlogged 

AMS 52 68 42 

APHIS 222 234 360 

DA 43 58 62 

FAS 16 12 26 

FNS 47 207 487 

FS 472 473 649 

FSA 8522 8671 18 

FSIS 102 108 215 

NRCS 55 64 9 

OASCR 10 12 17 

OBPA 1 1 1 

OCFO 10 6 0 

OGC 11 6 21 

OHA 18 18 0 

OIG 33 22 52 

OSEC 31 43 38 

RD 107 103 67 

REE 40 51 14 

RMA 15 13 3 

AGENCY OVERALL 9807 10170 2081
Exhibit23

IndependentAuditors’ Consent

The Board ofDirectorsSyncor International Corporation:

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.33-7325, 33-39251, 33-57762, 33-52607, 333-18373, 333-18375,333-18377, 333-39999, 333-40117, 333-62091, 333-62093, 333-68277,333-78681, 333-45312 and 333-45310) on Form S-8 of SyncorInternational Corporation and subsidiaries of our report datedFebruary 15, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets ofSyncor International Corporation and subsidiaries as of December31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements ofincome, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2001, and related schedule, which report appears inthe December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of SyncorInternational Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles,CaliforniaMarch 30, 2002
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 18, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00557

- CV

CARDINAL SENIOR CARE, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Greg BRADWELL,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CI11679

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appell ee ’s brief i s due on February 28 , 202 2

. On February 17 , 202 2 , appell ee filed a n unopposed motion to extend time to file appell ee ’s brief. The motion is GRANTED . Appell ee ’s

brief is due no later than Ma r ch 30 , 202 2

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of February, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6408 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6408

 To allow States to return certain funds made available for high speed 
 rail and intercity rail projects to the general fund of the Treasury 
                 for Federal budget deficit reduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2010

 Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, and Mr. Petri) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow States to return certain funds made available for high speed 
 rail and intercity rail projects to the general fund of the Treasury 
                 for Federal budget deficit reduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETURN OF FUNDS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal law, any unobligated 
funds made available under the heading ``Federal Railroad 
Administration, Capital Assistance for High Speed Rail and Intercity 
Passenger Rail Service'' in title XII of Division A of the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5) may be 
returned by a State to the Secretary of Transportation who shall 
deposit any such funds into the general fund of the Treasury for 
Federal budget deficit reduction.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.11






    1


     


    





    2


     


    





    3


     


    





    4


     


    





    5


     


    





    6


     


    





    7


     


    





    8


     


    





    9


     


    





    10


     


    





    11


     


    





    12


     


    





    13


     


    





    14


     


    





    15


     


    





    16


     


    





    17


     


    





    18


     


    





    19


     


    





    20


     


    





    21


     


    





    22


     


    





    23


     


    





    24


     


    





    25


     


    





    26


     


    





    27


     


    





    28


     


    





    29


     


    





    30


     


    





    31


     


    





    32


     


    





    33


     


    





    34


     


    





    35


     


    





    36


     


    




    37


     


    

    



    38


     


    

    



    39


     


    
        



    40


     


    
        



    41


     


    
        





42
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,824]


Heritage Sportswear Marion, South Carolina; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 12, 2001, in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at Heritage Sports-wear, Marion, South 
Carolina.
    The petitioners were separated from the subject firm more than a 
year prior to the postmark date of the petition February 24, 2001. 
Section 223(b)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 specifies that no 
certification may apply to any worker whose last separation occurred 
more than a year before the date of the petition. Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of April 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-10947 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Jacqueline R. CARROLL-HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The ARC OF BALTIMORE; Ron Christian; Dele Sangodeyi; Monique Dubois; Shareen Jones; Kevin Pushia; Chrystie Nicholson; Kim Meekins; Ryan Reif; Olu Fatodu; Alan Campbell, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-2200.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 2011.

Decided: May 18, 2011.

Jacqueline R. Carroll-Hall, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Jacobson, Blades & Rosenfeld, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline R. Carroll-Hall appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her complaint alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010), and under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Carroll-Hall v. The Arc of Baltimore,*No. 1:10-cv-00873-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR     Document 8      Filed 07/25/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR     Document 8      Filed 07/25/2007     Page 2 of 2