alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21159-21160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
     Name of Committee: Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory 
Committee.
     General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on May 24, 2001, from 8:30 
a.m. to 5 p.m., and on May 25, 2001, from at 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Location: National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Bldg. 10, Clinical Center, Jack Masur Auditorium, Bethesda, MD.
    Contact: Joan C. Standaert, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 
(HFD-110), Food and Drug Administration, Woodmont II Bldg., 1451 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD, 20752, 419-259-6211, or John M. Treacy, 
301-827-7001, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-
8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington DC area), code 12533. Please call 
the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.

[[Page 21160]]

    Agenda: On May 24, 2001, the committee will discuss: (1) Published 
interim analyses of ALLHAT (antihypertensive and lipid lowering 
treatment to prevent heart attack trial) sponsored by the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, and (2) response to the 
citizen's petition of Lawrence D. Bernhardt and Arnold Liebman, 
regarding new drug application (NDA) 19-668, Cardura<Register> 
(doxazosin), Pfizer, Inc. On May 25, 2001, the committee will discuss 
NDA 20-920 Natrecor<Register> (nesiritide), Scios, Inc., for treatment 
of acute heart failure.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by May 18, 2001. 
Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Time allotted for each 
presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral 
presentations should notify the contact person before May 18, 2001, and 
submit a brief statement on the general nature of the evidence or 
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed 
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to 
make their presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: April 11, 2001.
Linda A. Suydam,
Senior Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 01-10450 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Technology Transfer Act of 1986; Chevron Research and Technology 
Co.

AGENCY: Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Cooperative Research & Development Agreement 
(CRADA) Negotiations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating 
entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) 
with the Chevron Research and Technology Company, a division of Chevron 
U.S.A. Inc. for the purpose of evaluating hyperspectral remote sensing 
technology that permits the rapid assessment of vegetation type.

INQUIRIES: If any other parties are interested in similar activities 
with the USGS, please contact Delores Richardson, Administrative 
Officer, USGS National Wetlands Research Center, 700 Cajundome Blvd., 
Lafayette, LA 70506, phone (337) 266-8515.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is submitted to meet the USGS 
requirements stipulated in Survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

Susan Haseltine,
Chief Scientist for Biology.
[FR Doc. 01-10815 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-17-M
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT,

4 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION,

5 Petitioner-Appellee,

6 v. NO. 32,696

7 ROBYN C. DELARUE,

8 Respondent-Appellant,

9 and

10 KENNETH R. BEASLEY, JR.

11 Respondent.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY

13 Daylene A. Marsh, District Judge

14 Cindy L. Gray

15 Farmington, NM

16 for Appellee

17 Robyn Delarue
1 Aztec, NM

2 Pro se Appellant

3 MEMORANDUM OPINION

4 WECHSLER, Judge.

5 {1} Appearing pro se, Co-Respondent/Appellant, Robyn C. DeLaRue, (Mother)

6 appeals from the district court’s final judgment and order, dated February 12, 2013.

7 We issued a notice proposing to summarily affirm, and Mother filed a letter

8 memorandum, which we will construe as a memorandum in opposition to proposed

9 summary affirmance.

10 {2} In our notice, we recognized that Mother appeared to raise two issues in her

11 docketing statement. First, Mother appeared to challenge the district court’s award

12 of primary physical custody of Child to Co-Respondent, Kenneth Beasley, Jr., (Father)

13 notwithstanding Mother’s allegations that Father abused and neglected Child. Second,

14 Mother appeared to believe that the lawyers, judges, and guardian ad litem involved

15 in this case should be reprimanded or disciplined. With respect to the first issue, we

16 proposed to conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding

17 primary physical custody of Child to Father because its decision was supported by

18 substantial evidence. With respect to the second issue, we proposed to conclude that
2

1 Mother did not preserve this issue in the district court. We noted that, if the issue had

2 been preserved, we would propose to affirm on the merits because there was no

3 evidence that anyone involved in the case was improperly biased or otherwise

4 deserving of reprimand.

5 {3} In her memorandum in opposition, Mother does not raise any new legal or

6 factual arguments. Instead, she merely repeats verbatim four paragraphs from her

7 docketing statement. “A party responding to a summary calendar notice must come

8 forward and specifically point out errors of law and fact.” State v. Mondragon, 1988-

9 NMCA-027, ¶ 10, 107 N.M. 421, 759 P.2d 1003. Because Mother has failed to point

10 out any errors, we affirm.

11 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 ________________________________

13 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

14 WE CONCUR:

15 ________________________________

16 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

17 ________________________________

18 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Form 10-K of Southern Union Company (the “Company”) for the
year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George L. Lindemann, Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, except as otherwise noted under Item 9A therein, and (ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.













/s/ GEORGE L.
LINDEMANN






George L.
Lindemann




Chairman
of the Board and


Chief
Executive Officer


February
26, 2009









This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

INTERNATIONAL INTERNSHIP 

PROGRAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 10-1234 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

F or the reasons set forth in the 

(Mar~~ Memorandum Opinion entered this ~ __ day of 

March 2012, it is hereby 

ORDERED that defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss and Partial Motion for 

Summary Judgment [Dkt. #33] is GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #37] is 

DENIED; and it is further 

ORDERED that Counts I through IV in plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint 

[Dkt. #9] are dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; it is further 

ORDERED that Counts V and VI in plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint 

[Dkt. #9] are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge 

1
The HONORABLE ANDREW W. BOGUE, United States District Judge for 1

the District of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4277

___________

Denise M. Irwin, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States 

v. * District Court for the 

* District of South Dakota.

Homestake Mining Co., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 11, 1998

 Filed: June 23, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, HEANEY and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Denise M. Irwin appeals from the entry of summary judgment by the District

Court in favor of Homestake Mining Co. in Irwin's employment discrimination action. 1

Having considered the briefs, the record, and the arguments of the parties, we conclude

the District Court correctly granted Homestake's motion for summary judgment and
-2-

than an opinion would lack precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of

the District Court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
HEALTHWORLD CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                     6851
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             30298
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          41313
<PP&E>                                                    10296
<DEPRECIATION>                                             5150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            79539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     37009
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     81
<OTHER-SE>                                                41140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              79539
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          54815
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             48618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         (452)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            6649
<INCOME-TAX>                                               2875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        3756
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                               3756
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.49



</TABLE>
#### STOKES, Respondent, v. STOKES, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

April 13, 1894.)

Action by Edward S. Stokes against William E. D. Stokes. G. H. Adams, for appellant. G. P. Smith, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 20585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10261]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2001 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 20585]]

                Presidential Determination No. 01-13 of April 17, 2001

                
Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions 
                Regarding the Palestine Liberation Organization

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority and conditions contained in 
                section 538(d) of the Foreign Operations, Export 
                Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
                2001, Public Law 106-429, I hereby determine and 
                certify that it is important to the national security 
                interests of the United States to waive the provisions 
                of section 1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987, 
                Public Law 100-204.

                This waiver shall be effective for a period of 6 months 
                from the date hereof. You are hereby authorzed and 
                directed to transmit this determination to the Congress 
                and to publish in in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, April 17, 2001.

[FR Doc. 01-10261
Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
#### *In re*VINCENT, David Andrew

(MR 21784)

South Portland, ME

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent David Andrew Vincent, who has been disciplined in the State of Maine, is reprimanded in the State of Illinois.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Stephen R. Wright, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pro-Fac
Cooperative, Inc.


Dated:       September 23, 2005                    /s/ Stephen R. Wright
         ----------------------------          --------------------------------
                                               General Manager, Chief Executive
                                               Officer, Chief Financial Officer
                                               and Secretary
                                               (Principal Executive Officer and
                                               Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S BALANCE SHEET DATED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND ITS CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, WHICH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN ITEM 8 OF THIS REPORT, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,695,884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,108,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                   480,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,671,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,065,570
<PP&E>                                     103,492,414
<DEPRECIATION>                            (39,744,176)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,407,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,162,768
<BONDS>                                     47,382,793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       715,736
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,146,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               111,407,753
<SALES>                                    120,281,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           120,281,047
<CGS>                                       87,174,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              121,135,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               403,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,336,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,166,290)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,320,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,846,290)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,846,290)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2020

a0921 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2020

160780(54)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160780

COA: 343844

Grand Traverse CC:

DALLAS DAVID WALKER, 17

- 012823

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsid eration of this Court’s May 26, 2020

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration

of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

# AGENCY:

Rural Telephone Bank, USDA.

# ACTION:

Staff briefing for the Board of Directors.

# TIME AND DATE:

2 p.m., Thursday, May 10, 2001.

# PLACE:

Conference Room 5030, South Building, Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED:

1. Current telecommunications industry issues.

2. Contract for business advisor to the Privatization Committee.

3. Transferability of Class C stock to a stockholder's subsidiary company.

4. Office of the Inspector General's audit report on FY 2000 financial statements.

5. FY 2000 annual report.

6. Administrative issues.

# ACTION:

Board of Directors meeting.

# TIME AND DATE:

9 a.m., Friday, May 11, 2001.

# PLACE:

Conference Room 107-A, Jamie L. Whitten Building, Department of Agriculture, 12th and Jefferson Drive, SW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

 Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the Board of Directors meeting:

1. Call to order.

2. Action on Minutes of the February 6, 2001, board meeting.

3. Report on loans approved in the second quarter of FY 2001.

4. Report on financial activity for the second quarter of FY 2001.

5. Privatization Committee report.

6. Clarification on stock policy regarding the transferability of Class C stock to a stockholder's subsidiary company.

7. Action on the Bank's annual report for FY 2000.

8. Adjournment.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Roberta D. Purcell, Assistant Governor, Rural Telephone Bank, (202) 720-9554.

Dated: April 26, 2001.

Blaine D. Stockton,

Acting Governor, Rural Telephone Bank.

[FR Doc. 01-10958 Filed 4-27-01; 12:29 pm]

BILLING CODE 3410-15-P