alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 741 

To amend section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to provide 

for rental assistance payments to assist certain owners of manufactured 

homes who rent the lots on which their homes are located. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 

1937 to provide for rental assistance payments to assist 

certain owners of manufactured homes who rent the lots 

on which their homes are located. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mobile Home Protec5 tion Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 741 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO UNITED STATES HOUSING ACT OF 

2 1937. 

3 Section 8(o)(12) of the United States Housing Act 

4 of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(12)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting after ‘‘, 

6 or to (pursuant to subparagraph (C)),’’ after ‘‘on be7 half of’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS DIRECTLY TO

11 FAMILY.—In the case only of a low-income fam12 ily that owns a manufactured home, rents the 

13 real property on which it is located, and to 

14 whom assistance under this paragraph has been 

15 made available, the public housing agency mak16 ing such assistance available shall enter into a 

17 contract to make assistance payments under 

18 this paragraph directly to the family (rather 

19 than to the owner of such real property) if— 

20 ‘‘(i) the owner of the real property re21 fuses to enter into a contract to receive as22 sistance payments pursuant to this para23 graph; 

24 ‘‘(ii) the family was residing in such 

25 manufactured home on such real property 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 741 IH

1 at the time such assistance was initially 

2 made available on behalf of the family; 

3 ‘‘(iii) the family provides such assur4 ances to the agency, as the Secretary may 

5 require, to ensure that amounts from the 

6 assistance payments are used for rental of 

7 the real property; and 

8 ‘‘(iv) the rental of the real property 

9 otherwise complies with the requirements 

10 for assistance under this paragraph. 

11 A contract pursuant to this subparagraph shall 

12 be subject to the provisions of subparagraph 

13 (B) and any other provisions applicable to con14 tracts under this paragraph, except that the 

15 Secretary may provide such exceptions as the 

16 Secretary considers appropriate to facilitate the 

17 provision of assistance under this subpara18 graph.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2000 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-29-2000

USA Ex Rel Merena v. Smithkline Beecham

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 98-1497

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2000 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA Ex Rel Merena v. Smithkline Beecham" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 40.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/40
Filed April 21, 2000 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 98-1497 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. 

ROBERT J. MERENA 

v. 

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 

United States of America, 

Appellant 

No. 98-1498 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. 

KEVIN J. SPEAR; THE BERKELEY COMMUNITY LAW 

CENTER; JACK DOWDEN 

v. 

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 

United States of America, 

Appellant 

No. 98-1499 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. 

GLENN GROSSENBACHER; CHARLES W. ROBINSON, JR. 

v. 
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 

United States of America, 

Appellant 

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

(Dist. Ct. No. 93--cv--5974) 

District Judge: The Honorable Donald W. VanArtsdalen 

Argued: March 5, 1999 

Before: ALITO, McKEE, AND GARWOOD,* Circuit Judges 

(Opinion Filed: February 29, 2000) 

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION 

The slip opinion in this case is amended as follows: 

1. In the first sentence of Part IA of the opinion, the 

phrase "had adopted a scheme" is amended to read "had 

adopted the following scheme." 

2. In the second sentence of Part IA of the opinion, the 

words "Specifically, the government suspected that" are 

deleted and the word "the" preceding the word 

"laboratories" is capitalized. 

3. The paragraph indentation between the second and

third sentences of Part IA of the opinion is eliminated. 

BY THE COURT: 

Samuel A. Alito 

Circuit Judge 

_________________________________________________________________ 

* The Honorable Will L. Garwood, Senior Circuit Judge for the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. 

 2 
A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 3
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00151-CV

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY AND METROPOLITAN 

REINSURANCE COMPANY

APPELLANTS

V.

T. KLEMER AND J.G. 

WENTWORTH ORGINATIONS, LLC

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. C06666

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion To Voluntarily 

Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; 

therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: August 14, 2014
EXHIBIT 99.1


      I, J. Ed Eisemann IV, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of The
Republic Corporation (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act
of 2002, with respect to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"), that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and not
for any other purpose.



/s/ J. Ed Eisemann, IV                                    June 30, 2003
-----------------------      Chief Executive and          -----------------
J. Ed Eisemann, IV           Chief Financial Officer      Date
jcg-ex101_193.htm



Exhibit 10.1

Execution Version

AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”), is entered into as of November 26, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), by and between J. Crew Group, Inc. (the “Company”) and Libby Wadle (“Executive”).

 

WHEREAS, Executive currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer, Madewell Brand of J. Crew Group, Inc. (“J. Crew”) pursuant to the terms of an employment agreement between J. Crew and Executive dated as of November 28, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to enter into this Amendment to amend certain terms of the Employment Agreement; and

 

WHEREAS, capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Employment Agreement, unless specified to the contrary.

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.Section 2(c) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the first paragraph thereof:

 

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if the Company terminates the Employment Period without Cause, you terminate the Employment Period for Good Reason, or your employment terminates through a Company Non-Renewal Termination, the “Severance Benefits” under clause (i) above shall include an additional amount equal to one (1) times your target Annual Bonus, as in effect immediately prior to such termination, payable in substantially equal installments in accordance with the regular payroll practices of the Company during the Severance Period.

 

2.Amendment Effective Date.  This Amendment shall be effective as of the Effective Date.

 

3.Remaining Provisions.  Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment embodies the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, relative thereto.

 

4.Governing Law.  This Amendment is to be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of New York without regard to conflicts of laws.

 

5.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

*         *         *

 

 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.

 


	
 
	
 
	
J. CREW GROUP, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/LYNDA MARKOE

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Name:
	
Lynda Markoe

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Title:
	
Chief Administrative Officer and

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Global Head of Human Resources

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
EXECUTIVE

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/LIBBY WADLE

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Name:
	
Libby Wadle
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6848

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ERIC JEVONNE BENNETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, 

Senior District Judge. (7:08-cr-00146-BR-1; 7:11-cv-00182-BR)

Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Jevonne Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, 

Assistant United States Attorney, William Ellis Boyle, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric Jevonne Bennett appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Bennett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny his motion for appointment of counsel, deny a

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,055                  14,055
<SECURITIES>                                    24,923                  24,923
<RECEIVABLES>                                  600,784                 600,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               639,762                 639,762
<PP&E>                                           7,361                   7,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,818)                 (1,818)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 717,103                 717,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          561,518                 561,518
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            29                      29
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,446                 155,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   717,103                 717,103
<SALES>                                         31,609                  53,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,609                  53,764
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,534                  24,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,075                  29,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,126                  12,349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,839                  17,053
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,839                  17,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34                    0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34                    0.59
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Angela M. Pattatucci-Aragon, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5220, MSC 7852, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1775.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting timing due to the limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: May 21-23, 2001.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Days Inn Inner Harbor, 100 Hopkins Place, Baltimore, MD 
21201.
    Contact Person: Eugene Vigil, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5144, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1025.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333. Clinical Research, 93.333. 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10199 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Order filed April 27

, 201 2

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 1 1

- 0 1032

- CR

NO. 14

- 11

- 01033

- CR

____________

DEON RUSH

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 506t h District Court

Grimes County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No s

. 16022 and 16024C



### O R D E R

The reporter 's reco rd in th ese case s was originally due January 13, 201 2

. See Tex.

R. App. P. 35.2. On February 22, 2012, this court granted Kelly Kelly's motion to extend

time to file the reporter's record until April 20, 2012, with no f u r ther extensions

.

As of this date, t he record (s) h as not been filed with the court. Because the

reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.2

We order Kelly Kelly , the court reporter, to file the record (s) in th ese appeal s

within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be entertained absent

exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for

ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Kelly

Kelly does not timely file the record (s) as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial

court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record (s)

.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TEKGRAF, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,305,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,503,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                   350,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,977,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,261,901
<PP&E>                                         924,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                 289,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,137,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,060,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,328
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,064,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,137,386
<SALES>                                     44,376,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,376,511
<CGS>                                       37,297,566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,605,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               272,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                735,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                   400,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            335,771
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   303,887
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
|   | (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /S/ Marcia R. Martin    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Marcia R. Martin        |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                    |
|   |   | March 17, 2010          |