alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Form 10-K of Southern Union Company (the “Company”) for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George L. Lindemann, Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
except as otherwise noted under Item 9A therein, and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ GEORGE L.
LINDEMANN






George L.
Lindemann




Chairman
of the Board and


Chief
Executive Officer


March 1,
2010









This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
- How To Appeal 
    - Court Forms  and Fees        - Court Forms
      - Fee Schedule
      - Filing Fee 
    - Court Rules and Procedures        - Rules of Practice  and Procedure
      - Procedural Requirements for Staff Conferences
      - Internal Operating Procedures
      - Rules of Admission  and Practice
      - Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability
      - E-Filing Rules
      - Court Process
      - Court Efforts to Ensure Compliance with Court Rules 
    - Information About Practitioners        - Search List of Practitioners
      - Disciplinary Action
      - Key Points in Finding a Representative
      - Compendium of Disciplinary Grievances 
    - Orders and Opinions        - Miscellaneous Orders
      - Ceremonial Orders
      - Opinions and Full Court Orders
      - Search Decisions and Opinions
      - Recent Decisions / Opinions
      - Case Archives 
    - Active Panel Cases 
    - Stayed Cases 
    - Class Action Cases 
    - Electronic Filing 
    - Docket Search 
    - Oral Arguments        - Schedule
      - Oral Arguments via YouTube Live
      - Audio/Video
      - Oral Argument Educational Outreach 

US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Web Automated Reference Material System (WARMS), 			M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual
Veterans Law Library
Veterans of Foreign Wars
Back

USCAVC 16thJudicial ConferenceSeptember 19-20, 2024

Watch CAVC Oral Arguments on YouTube

Changes to Court Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability - EffectiveJanuary 10, 2024

In the News: Articles

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Davis, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belli, J.), rendered March 18, 1988, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The prosecution has submitted documentary evidence which establishes that the defendant executed a written waiver of indictment, in accordance with the provisions of CPL 195.20. Accordingly, the defendant’s challenge to the jurisdictional *635validity of the superior court information under which he was prosecuted is without merit *(cf., People v Banville,*134 AD2d 116). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Ronald C. Mariello, Respondent, v Sovran Group, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Special Term correctly held that the stock sale and repurchase provisions of the parties’ shareholders’ agreement, which were triggered by petitioner’s termination from employment, do not, as a matter of law, bar petitioner’s proceeding to dissolve the corporation pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a. Because the agreement does not explicitly provide that the stock sale and repurchase provisions are the exclusive remedy available to a minority shareholder, a question of fact exists whether the "fair return on * * * investment” requirement of Business Corporation Law § 1104-a (b) (1) has been met *(see, Matter of Pace Photographers [Rosen],*71 NY2d 737, 747-748). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J. — dismiss proceeding.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Call 911 in case of fire 

or medical emergency!

OTHER PHONE NUMBERS:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         May 8, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/E2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Tracy A. Shahan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, NIH/NIAMS, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4952.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 20, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-10351  Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Hynes & Howes Insurance Counselors, Inc.
Davenport, Iowa


                          Independent Auditor's Report

We have audited the balance sheet of Hynes & Howes Insurance Counselors, Inc.
as of September 30, 1999, and the related statements of income, retained
earnings, paid-in-capital, and cash flows for the years ended September 30,
1999.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.  The financial statements of Hynes & Howes
Insurance Counselors, Inc. as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, were audited by
other auditors who have ceased operation and whose report dated December 18,
1998, expressed an unqualified opinion on these statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 12 to the financial statements, the company has restated
its September 30, 1998 financial statements during the current year to reflect
income from installment sales contracts, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.  The other auditors reported on the September 30, 1998
financial statements before the restatement.

In our opinion, the September 30, 1999 financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hynes &
Howes Insurance Counselors, Inc. as of September 30, 1999, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.





                                 Shapley, Shapley & Moorhead, P.C.
                                 Certified Public Accountants

Davenport, Iowa
November 30, 1999
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
A. McIntyre, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant Section. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                         /s/ Douglas A. McIntyre
                         Douglas A. McIntyre
                         Chairman, President and Chief
                         Executive Officer
                         On2 Technologies, Inc.
                         August 13, 2003



                                      -26-
[Cite as State v. Hanley , 2017-Ohio-425.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

CLERMONT COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2016-07-054

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 2/6/2017 : ROBERT MICHAEL HANLEY, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLERMONT COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 2016 CR 00122

Vincent D. Faris, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, Nicholas A. Horton, 76 South Riverside Drive, 2nd Floor, Batavia, Ohio 45103, for plaintiff-appellee Christine D. Tailer, P.O. Box 14, Georgetown, Ohio 45121, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Robert Hanley, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may beClermont CA2016-07-054 predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proc eedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constituti onal rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT, 3 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, 4 Petitioner-Appellee, 5
v. NO. 32,696 6 ROBYN C. DELARUE, 7 Respondent-Appellant, 8 and 9 KENNETH R. BEASLEY, JR. 10 Respondent. 11
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 12 Daylene A. Marsh, District Judge 13 Cindy L. Gray 14 Farmington, NM 15 for Appellee 16 Robyn Delarue 17Aztec, NM 1 Pro se Appellant 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION 3 WECHSLER, Judge. 4 {1} Appearing pro se, Co-Respondent/Appe llant, Robyn C. DeLaRue, (Mother) 5 appeals from the district court’s final j udgment and order, dated February 12, 2013. 6 We issued a notice proposing to summarily affirm, and Mother filed a letter 7 memorandum, which we will construe as a memorandum in opposition to proposed 8 summary affirmance. 9 {2} In our notice, we recognized that Mother appeared to raise two issues in her 10 docketing statement. First, Mother appearedto challenge the district court’s award 11 of primary physical custody of Child to Co-Respondent, Kenneth Beasley, Jr., (Father) 12 notwithstanding Mother’s allegations that Father abused and neglected Child. Second, 13 Mother appeared to believe that the lawy ers, judges, and guardian ad litem involved 14 in this case should be reprimanded or discip lined. With respect to the first issue, we 15 proposed to conclude that the district c ourt did not abuse its discretion in awarding 16 primary physical custody of Child to Father because its decision was supported by 17 substantial evidence. With respect to the second issue, we proposed to conclude that 182 Mother did not preserve this issue in the district court. We noted that, if the issue had 1 been preserved, we would propose to affirm on the merits because there was no 2 evidence that anyone involved in the case was improperly biased or otherwise 3 deserving of reprimand. 4 {3} In her memorandum in opposition, Moth er does not raise any new legal or 5 factual arguments. Instead, she merely repeats verbatim four paragraphs from her 6 docketing statement. “A party responding to a summary calendar notice must come 7 forward and specifically point out errors of law and fact.” State v. Mondragon , 1988- 8 NMCA-027, ¶ 10, 107 N.M. 421, 759 P.2d 1003. Because Moth er has failed to point 9 out any errors, we affirm. 10 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED. 11

__________ ______________________ 12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 13
WE CONCUR: 14

________________________________ 15 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 16

________________________________ 17 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 18
EXHIBIT 32.1








Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaDel Pharma Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Steven B. Ratoff, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Craig A. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Steven B. RatoffSteven B. RatoffPresident and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date:  May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Craig A. JohnsonCraig A. JohnsonChief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
Order filed, March 31, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00203-CV

____________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF MELBA JO MONTGOMERY 

AND LEO BRIAN MONTGOMERY, Appellant

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-34055

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 12, 2015. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Benjamin Alva, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 663 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 65
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 663

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 20, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, as the ``Yvonne Ingram-
                    Ephraim Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. YVONNE INGRAM-EPHRAIM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Yvonne Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Yvonne 
Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building''.
                                                        Calendar No. 65

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 663

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, as the ``Yvonne Ingram-
                    Ephraim Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 20, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Geological Survey

# AGENCY:

U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed cooperative research & development agreement (CRADA) negotiations.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with Hamilton Operating, Inc., to obtain and characterize various coalbeds from the Eagle Pass Basin, in south Texas.

*Inquiries:*                         If any other parties are interested in similar activities with the USGS, please contact Charles E. Barker, USGS Denver Federal Center, Sixth Ave. and Kipling St., Building 20, MS 977, Denver, CO 80225, (303) 236-5797.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is submitted to meet the USGS requirements stipulated in Survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

P. Patrick Leahy,

Associate Director for Geology.

[FR Doc. 01-10817  Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M