alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 31, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31115

Summary Calendar

NANCY MARIAN WHITTY

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF NEW ORLEANS;

MAYOR C RAY NAGIN; WARREN J RILEY, Police Superintendent;

OFFICER F DENTON

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:06-CV-1835

Before WIENER, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We affirm the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of Nancy Marian

Whitty’s suit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Her complaint does not

allege any facts that would substantiate her conclusory claim that her First and

Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated. See Arnaud v. Odom, 870 F.2d

304, 307 (5th Cir. 1989) (“A plaintiff may not . . . plead merely conclusory
No. 06-31115

2

allegations to successfully state a section 1983 claim, but must instead set forth

specific facts which, if proven, would warrant the relief sought.”); FED. R. CIV.P.

12(b)(6).

AFFIRMED.
OFFICE OF -IWE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

910 
911 

*The Pamilt, of the el*ottvn &hew*4 e w 

aa$a?lty in ravor Al' ralring tho tu Fate !#rca? 

$1.00 to &25. 

"Xt IO sw oonkntion that Se E. 80. 362 validoted that el8otlaa. BothL)eo. 1 and 2 OI 5. 75. 

lo. IW soem pl&ln aou@ te w that tho above 

l b Oti@ Kt N ë?8li& 

ìTh o r 0 1 * Do 6o ns#emtloeve n r th is ~la eue, ua ly 

the timuteeoa f tha Anto n lhdep a b urc Bl*tr let 

~ttebeoure,aadXtUnkanoplnlonfmamyeu 

Lo All th a t io no a o o *o r y.* I 
‘. 912 

~brefon, oinoa ltr oreathn, uid #ohool dlrtrfet haa 

operated under the ciemarrlZ*wr of ‘hxao %nsofar aa tetlau and shotion tbezwfor eav oonaorned~ 
913 

Sootian U OS u5.d Ant pro+i408a 
91 

'A rrli(irt* or owtioo statute is on0 6u- 

*oka xor 
915 

Road Dlatrlot x0. 0 Va F9ual-a 116 

SO6 8. W. lO62$ Tam Oroon Co& Y. 

Tax* 547, 

Tu. 200, 800 4,. 01. 

Ikwd~, 116 

S6l, 
9.16 

Rc4wv*r, on aQtiQn ror rohow5ag in thl8 1Q* u80, 

)17&W. (2)780,J*o &pwP8ktw t!bM 8lamo 
917 
91.8
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Liquidity

        Registrant receives approximately $7,189 of cash each month from
payments of principal and interest on Real Estate Contracts Receivable.
Registrant has very little liquidity because most of these payments are used to
pay management fees and other operating expenses.

Capital Resources

        The principal assets of the registrant at September 30, 1998 are
eighteen real estate contracts receivable.

Results of Operations

        The income from operations for the year ended September 30, 1998
increased $13,086 compared to the year ended September 30, 1997.

        Operating income decreased $34,005.  This was primarily due to a
decrease in interest income.  Tanglefoot Apartment contract which was paid off
during 1997 and a large part of the proceeds received were used to pay off the
real estate mortgage payable resulting in less proceeds to be invested in assets
earning interest.

        Operating expenses decreased $47,091.  The decrease resulted from the
following:

        Interest expense decreased $41,517 due to the payoff of the mortgage on
the apartment complex.  There should be no interest expense in the future.

        Management fees increased $3,250.  Only eleven months management fees
were paid in 1997 and twelve months fees were paid during 1998.

        Legal fees decreased $11,349 due to less legal work being required.
Selling the apartment complex and acquiring real estate contracts during 1997
required more legal work being performed than in 1998.

        Other operating expenses increased $4,080.
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  May 5, 2009                     /s/ Zhigang Wang ------------------------------- Zhigang Wang, CEO & CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6464 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6464

 To amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to make 
fire department grant funds available for fire station construction, to 
reauthorize the firefighter assistance program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2010

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on Science and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to make 
fire department grant funds available for fire station construction, to 
reauthorize the firefighter assistance program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firefighter Safety Enhancement Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. USE OF FIRE DEPARTMENT GRANT FUNDS.

    Section 33(b)(3)(J) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act 
of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(b)(3)(J)) is amended by inserting ``, repair, 
construct, and reconstruct'' before ``fire stations''.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY OF STANDARDS.

    Section 33(b) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 
1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(18) Applicability of standards.--The Director shall 
        require a fire department or organization that applies for a 
        grant under paragraph (3)(J) to comply with the standards of 
        section 611(j)(9) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
        Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5196(j)(9)), as in effect 
        on the date of enactment of this paragraph, with respect to 
        projects carried out using amounts from the grant in the same 
        manner as recipients are required to comply in order to receive 
        financial contributions from the Director for emergency 
        preparedness purposes.''.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 33(e)(1) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 
1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(e)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        for the purposes of this section $1,300,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2011 through 2014. Of the amounts authorized in 
        this paragraph, not to exceed $300,000,000 shall be made 
        available each fiscal year to modify, repair, construct, and 
        reconstruct fire stations, fire training facilities, and other 
        facilities under subsection (b)(3)(J).''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 37      Filed 07/18/2007     Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service 

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability and intent. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the table grape variety designated “Princess” is available for licensing and that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to the California Table Grape Commission of Fresno, California, an exclusive license to this variety in selected countries outside the United States where breeder's rights are available. 

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before July 30, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1158, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5257. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's intellectual property rights to this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as the California Table Grape Commission has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within ninety (90) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 

Michael D. Ruff,

Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 01-10605 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-34745, 33-76780, 333-00075, 333-71339,333-07091, 333-71335, 333-81949, 333-55962, and 333-121106 of Aleris International, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Aleris International, Inc., Aleris International Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Aleris International, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 11, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 20.1
 Map of the Companys Parcels in
Downtown Providence, Rhode Island
  Parcel No.Capital
    
    
    Square Feet.Center
    
    
    Parcel Size
    
    Development on Parcels2
    
    
    92,000
    
    17-and 19-Story Condo Buildings under construction - 307,000 gross square feet3S
    
    
    48,000
    
    13-Story Office Building - 235,000 gross square feet3W
    
    
    35,0003E
    
    
    24,0004W
    
    
    46,0004E
    
    
    22,0005
    
    
    54,000
    
    8-Story Apartment Building - 454,000 gross square feet6
    
    
    276,000
    
    2 4 Story Residential Buildings under construction  300,000 gross square feet7A
    
    
    76,000
    
    330-Car Public Parking Garage8
    
    
    36,000
    
    4-Story Office Building  114,000 gross square feet9
    
    
    72,000
    
    10-Story Office Building  210,000 gross square feetOutsideCapitalCenter20
    
    
    20,500
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 June 23, 2004 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

___________________________

No. 02-15969

_______________________________

D. C. Docket No. 01-00182-CV-4-CAR-5

ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

 Plaintiff-

 Counter-Defendant-

 Appellee,

versus

CITY OF MACON, 

 Defendant-

 Counter-Claimant-

 Appellant.

_______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________________

(June 23, 2004)

Before ANDERSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and PROPST*, District Judge.

_____________________

* Honorable Robert B. Propst, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama,

sitting by designation.
2

PER CURIAM:

The procedural history, facts and issues in this case are summarized in our

previous opinion in which we certified a dispositive question of state law to the

Supreme Court of Georgia. Alltel Communications v. City of Macon, 345 F.3d

1219 (11th Cir. 2003). We have received the answer of the Supreme Court of

Georgia. City of Macon v. Alltel Comm., Inc., No. S04Q0128, 2004 WL 956303 

(Ga. May 3, 2004). That answer being consistent with the declaration and final

judgment of the district court, we hereby affirm that judgment.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         334,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  608,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    449,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,531,723
<PP&E>                                         432,123
<DEPRECIATION>                               (331,079)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,881,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,014,007
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,777
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,881,906
<SALES>                                      2,102,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,102,324
<CGS>                                        1,096,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,096,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               546,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               459,391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                466,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,019
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   465,173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR. 07-0011

IN THE MATTER OF CALLING A RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE 

# FILED AUG 16 2023
BON/011 GreenWOCK1 Clerk of Supreme Cour , State of Montana ORDER.

The Honorable Mike Menahan, Judge of the District Court for the First Judicial District ofthe State ofMontana, has requested the assistance ofretired District JudgeMike Salvagni to assume jurisdiction of Lewis and Clark County Cause No. ADC 2022-480, State ofMontana v. Justin J. Fifield. Judge Salvagni has retired under the provisions ofthe Montana Judges' Retirement System and, being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a) and (b), MCA, has advised that he is agreeable to assisting the First Judicial District Court with the above-listed matter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Honorable Mike Salvagni, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active service in the District Court oftheFirst Judicial District ofthe State ofMontana, to assume judicial authority ofLewis and Clark County CauseNo. ADC 2022-480, State of Montana

v. JustinJ. Fifield, and ishereby authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings, opinions, and orders, including final resolution ofsaid matter. 2. For all active service, Judge Sahragni shall be paid the salary compensation to which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, if any, shall be reimbursed. 3. A copy of this Order shall be filed with the Clerk of Court of the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County, with the request that this Order be sent to all counsel of record in the above-listed matter. 08/16/2023

Case Number: PR 07-0011

### 4. A copy ofthis Order shall also be furnished to theHonorableMikeMenahan, the

Honorable Mike Salvagni, and to Cathy Pennie, Office of the Supreme Court Administrator. The ChiefJustice enters this Orderpursuantto Article WI, Section 6(3) ofthe 1972 Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in implementation thereof. 1

/ 4am DATED this I 1, day ofAugust, 2023.

ChiefJustice

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          72,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  369,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,100
<INVENTORY>                                    132,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               831,400<F1>
<PP&E>                                       1,475,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 824,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,415,100<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          830,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           800
<OTHER-SE>                                     307,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,415,100
<SALES>                                        710,700<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               731,900
<CGS>                                          433,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  433,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,200<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,600)<F4>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (35,200)<F5>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
<FN>
<F1> Includes net assets of discontinued operations of $8,200.
<F2> Excludes sales of $431,200 of the Packaging Business, which was classified
     as a discontinued operation as of December 31, 1997.
<F3> Excludes interest expense allocated to Grace's discontinued operations
     of $13,300 ($8,700 after-tax).
<F4> Includes pretax operating income of the Packaging Business of $60,500 
     ($39,900 after-tax), allocated interest expense of $13,300 ($8,700
     after-tax), costs related to the Packaging Business transaction of
     $32,600 ($28,300 after-tax) and a related pension plan curtailment loss of
     $8,400 ($5,500 after-tax).
<F5> Reflects extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Remer Y. Brinson, III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 12, 2006       /s/ Remer Y. Brinson, III         Remer Y. Brinson, III    Acting Principal Financial Officer