alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a list of information collection 
requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call 
the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301) 443-7978.

Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) Construction Grantee 
Checklist

    (OMB No. 0930-0104, Extension, no change)--Recipients of Federal 
CMHC construction funds are obligated to use the constructed facilities 
to provide mental health services. The CMHS Act was repealed in 1981 
except for the provision requiring grantees to continue using the 
facilities for mental health purposes for a 20-year period. In order 
for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's 
Center for Mental Health Services to monitor compliance of construction 
grantees the grantees are required to submit an annual report. This 
annual Checklist enables grantees to supply necessary information 
efficiently and with a minimum of burden. The following table 
summarizes the annual burden for this program.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Annual          Responses/         Hours per
                                             respondents       respondent         response       Annual  burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CMHS Grantee Construction Checklist [42             \1\ 16                 1               .42                 7
 CFR 54.209(h), 42 CFR 54.213, 42 CFR
 54.214]................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Average over the 3-year approval period as grantees with service obligations continue to complete their
  period of obligation.

    Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: 
Stuart Shapiro, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: April 18, 2001.
Richard Kopanda,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 01-10215 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10790 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RICKEY SCOTT BESSETTE ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12

- CR

- 423

- 1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rickey Scott
Bessette has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bessette h a s not filed a respo nse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 2 1 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10790 Document: 00513012567 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015No. 14

- 10790

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-10790 Document: 00513012567 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6264 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 

of genetically engineered fish. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

require labeling of genetically engineered fish. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, 

4 AND COSMETIC ACT REGARDING GENETI5 CALLY ENGINEERED SALMON. 

6 Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

7 Act (21 U.S.C. 343), is further amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6264 IH

1 ‘‘(z) If it contains genetically engineered fish unless 

2 the food bears a label stating that fact.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


            <ARTICLE> 5
            <1000>
                   
            <S>                             <C>
            <PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
            <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
            <PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
            <CASH>                                          11,789
            <SECURITIES>                                         0
            <RECEIVABLES>                                  111,070
            <ALLOWANCES>                                     3,113
            <INVENTORY>                                    174,204
            <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               619,675
            <PP&E>                                         594,157
            <DEPRECIATION>                                 338,366
            <TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,080,655
            <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          470,096
            <BONDS>                                        320,600
            <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
            <PREFERRED>                                          0
            <COMMON>                                            33
            <OTHER-SE>                                     233,973
            <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,080,655
            <SALES>                                      1,651,115
            <TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,663,822
            <CGS>                                        1,662,376
            <TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,662,376
            <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
            <LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,113
            <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,910
            <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (92,159)
            <INCOME-TAX>                                  (35,123)
            <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (57,036)
            <DISCONTINUED>                                (45,752)
            <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
            <CHANGES>                                            0
            <NET-INCOME>                                 (102,788)
            <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
            <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
                    

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Austin, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), rendered July 18, 1985, convicting him of rape in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the evidence demonstrated that the complaining witness’s in-court identification was based on her opportunity to view her assailant at close range and in an illuminated area during the commission of the crimes which spanned a period of some two hours. Moreover, her testimony that the defendant approached her from behind and pressed a metal object into her back while announcing that he had a gun, was sufficient to establish that he displayed "what appealed] to be a pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or other firearm” within the meaning of Penal Law § 160.10 (2) (b) *(see, People v Baskerville,*60 NY2d 374, 381; *People v Lopez,*73 NY2d 214). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Although, as a general rule, it is improper to adduce testimony from a complaining witness that he identified the defendant from a photograph *(see, People v Griffin,*29 NY2d 91; *People v Caserta,*19 NY2d 18; *see also, People v Bolden,*58 NY2d 741), an exception is available where defense counsel opens the door to this inquiry during his cross-examination of the witness *(see, People v Smith,*133 AD2d 863, 864, *lv denied*71 NY2d 903; *People v Giallombardo,*128 AD2d 547, 548, *lv denied*69 NY2d 1004). Hence, it was not improper for the prosecutor to elicit clarifying testimony from the complaining witness, on redirect examination, that she had identified the *591defendant from a photograph since defense counsel opened the door to this area of inquiry by creating the misimpression that the complaining witness was unable to make a photographic identification of the defendant.

In addition, the inadvertent destruction of the "rape kit” does not provide a basis for reversal *(see, People v Allgood,*70 NY2d 812; *see also, Arizona v Youngblood,*488 US —, 109 S Ct 333). Under the circumstances, the court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury that it could draw an adverse inference against the People due to the failure to preserve the evidence secured from the complainant *(see, People v Allgood, supra; People v Morales,*141 AD2d 567, *lv denied*72 NY2d 922).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised by his supplemental *pro se*brief and his claim of excessive sentence, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0003377 22-APR-2015 09:36 AM
PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


	$
    100,000	 	AN
    Holdings, LLC	 	November
    6, 2019
	Amount	 	Lender	 	Date


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the Undersigned acknowledges that he is indebted to the Lender in the amount stated herein and promises to pay
on or before the date specified to the order of AN Holdings, LLC (the “Lender”), the principal sum of
one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) together with interest thereon from the date hereof to maturity at an annual interest
rate of 15%. Said principal sum is due as soon as Undersigned receives a capital funding loan from any source.


 


All
installments, prepayments, and other payments of principal and interest are payable to Lender at ________________________
or at such other place as the Lender or holder may hereafter and from time to time designate in writing.


 


This
Note may be prepaid, in whole or in part, without penalty at any time. At maturity, or default or failure to pay any installment
of principal and interest required herein, the entire balance shall be immediately due and payable. Any remedy of Lender or holder
upon default of the Undersigned shall be cumulative and not exclusive and choice of remedy shall be at the sole election of Lender
or holder. The Undersigned agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney’s fees, whether or not any
suit, civil action, or other proceeding at law or in equity, is commenced. The Undersigned waives demand, presentment for payment,
protest and notice of protest and nonpayment of this Note and expressly agrees to remain bound for the payment of principal, interest
and other sums provided for by the terms of this Note, notwithstanding any extension or extensions of the time of, or for the
payment of, said principal. No delay or omission on the part of the Lender or holder in exercising any rights shall operate as
a waiver of such right. This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of Tennessee, and each party hereto agrees to venue
and jurisdiction in the federal and state courts located in Shelby County, Tennessee.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 


On
Demand Promissory Note Page 1  of 2


 




    	 	 	 



    	 



    

 


Executed
on November _______, 2019.


 


	 	UNDERSIGNED:
	 	 
	 	 
	 	Printed
    Name: Brian Cox
	 	Company:
    Surge Holdings, Inc. 


 


	WITNESS:	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Printed
    Name	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Signature	 


 


On Demand Promissory Note Page 2 of 2
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Debbie,

David Hamilton <dhamilton@brantpub.com>

Thursday, March 29,20077:21 PM

Deborah Blasucci <dblasucci@brantpub.com>

Sandra Brant <sbrant@brantpub.com>

FW: expense reports

I am trying to clean up email and just found this one. You sent it to me (and copied Victoria) less than 2 weeks before I

sent the email to her saying that she should not travel to Paris.

I think your email demonstrates that:

1) we were definitely trying to keep a tight hold on T&E expenses at that time, and

2) I was the point person for T&E and therefore it made sense for the email regarding Paris travel to come from me

David

From: Deborah Blasucci [mailto:dblasucci@brantpub.com]

Sent: Friday, October 06,2006 11:41 AM

To: 'David Hamilton'

Cc: vfuller@brantpub.com

Subject: expense reports

David,

As discussed last week on Dan's trade report, there are many other instances that we spoke about where your sales staff

is spending excessively on their T & E. As you know when the ad revenues are down like this year compared to budget,

we try and tighten up on the expense side. Let's go through each salesperson and see where they can cut down and

who is over their budgets.

Thanks,

Debbie

BRANT ARB 025175

Case 1:07-cv-05728-RJS-DCF Document 55-20 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 1
**USFF Band Menu**

                    - USFF Band Home
                    - USFF Band Leadership
                    - Performing Ensembles
                    - Upcoming Schedule
                    - U.S. Navy Fleet Band Auditions
                    - Contact USFF Band

**Brass Bands and Quintets**

Concerts are the premier events for U.S. Fleet Forces Band. The band has various ensembles that present a wide array of marches, patriotic selections, orchestral transcriptions and modern repertoires. Below are some ensembles that encompass our concert bands.**The Navigators:** An ensemble that blends chart-topping hits and traditional New Orleans style-brass band favorites. The band engages and captivates audiences with its high-energy style to entertain audiences of all ages, which is perfect for any festive occasion!**The Brass Quintet:** An ensemble that performs a broad repertoire of music that includes classical transcriptions, traditional marches and even Broadway! The small size, range of music and versatility of the band allows them to perform at a wide-variety of occasions and venues. The quintet frequently performs at public concerts and military ceremonies, but also performs during educational concerts and clinics for school-age children. Overall, they entertain audiences and enhance ceremonies throughout the Mid-Atlantic region with their professionalism and musicianship.

## Event Logistical Requirements

The logistical requirements for requesting brass bands and quintets may include:
                        -  A covered stage or flat, level surface, either (15'x15') or (24'x30') 
                        -  Electrical connectivity for 110-120 volt currents, two 20-amp circuits or equivalent 
                        -  Grounded electrical feeds/generators 
                        -  Proper lighting if it is an outdoor evening engagement 
                        -  Five chairs for the musicians 
                        -  Parking as close as possible to the stage, with truck clearance for 14 feet  
                        -  A private changing area for both male and female service members 

 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
NUMBER 13-22-00220-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF K.C.W., A CHILD

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. The notice of appeal 

was filed on May 10, 2022, and appellant’s brief was due on July 5, 2022. Appellant has 

filed an amended motion for extension of time, providing the reason for her request 

therein. Appellant seeks twenty days of additional time to file the brief.

Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the 

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals but include additional expedited 

deadlines and procedures. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). The 
2

intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that 

appeals in such cases are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the 

notice of appeal is filed. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). Accordingly, it is the policy of this 

Court to limit extensions of time in such cases absent truly extraordinary circumstances. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

We GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART appellant’s amended motion for 

extension of time and ORDER appellant’s brief to be filed on or before July 15, 2022. No 

further extensions of time will be granted absent truly exigent and extraordinary 

circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

8th day of July, 2022.
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Emile J. Jordan certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OraLabs Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Acts Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


     DATED DECEMBER 19, 2005            /S/ EMILE J. JORDAN
                                        -----------------------
                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Preventing Arson at 

Construction Sites

Awareness is key. Everyone can help to prevent arson at 

construction sites.

Contractors:

 Store solvents, fuels and tools in a locked storage container or remove them from the 

job site when you are not using them.

Request additional patrols or drive-bys from your local law enforcement. 

 Remove trash and debris from the job site. 

Try not to store excess materials on the job site.

Secure doors and windows on structures when crews are not actively working on the 

property.

Community:

 Awareness is essential. Become familiar with activities in your neighborhood.

 Report odd or suspicious activities to your local law enforcement.

For more information:

The National Association of State Fire Marshals offers free construction fire safety 

online training courses:

ĵ Building Inspector Fire Safety Course.

ĵ Overview for Safety Managers and Owners.

ĵ Construction Workers Fire Safety Course. 

Visit www.constructionfiresafety.training to enroll.

Visit www.usfa.fema.gov/aaw for more information.