# Official Journal L 67/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.067.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 67 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 569 March 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.067.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 67

English edition

Legislation

Volume 569 March 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 200/2013 of 8 March 2013 approving the active substance ametoctradin, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 201/2013 of 8 March 2013 amending Implementing Regulations (EU) No 788/2011 and (EU) No 540/2011 as regards an extension of the uses for which the active substance fluazifop-P is approved (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 202/2013 of 8 March 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 as regards the submission of support programmes in the wine sector and trade with third countries | 10 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 203/2013 of 8 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 17 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 204/2013 of 8 March 2013 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 4 to 5 March 2013 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of March 2013 | 19 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2013/123/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 26 February 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2013) 981) | 20 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 200/2013 of 8 March 2013 approving the active substance ametoctradin, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 201/2013 of 8 March 2013 amending Implementing Regulations (EU) No 788/2011 and (EU) No 540/2011 as regards an extension of the uses for which the active substance fluazifop-P is approved (
  1
  )

1

6

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 202/2013 of 8 March 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 as regards the submission of support programmes in the wine sector and trade with third countries

10

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 203/2013 of 8 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

17

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 204/2013 of 8 March 2013 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 4 to 5 March 2013 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of March 2013

19

DECISIONS

2013/123/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 26 February 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2013) 981)

(notified under document C(2013) 981)

20

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 200/2013

of 8 March 2013

approving the active substance ametoctradin, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular Article 13(2) and Article 78(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC (2) is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which a decision has been adopted in accordance with Article 6(3) of that Directive before 14 June 2011. For ametoctradin the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2009/535/EC (3). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC (2) is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which a decision has been adopted in accordance with Article 6(3) of that Directive before 14 June 2011. For ametoctradin the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2009/535/EC (3).

| (2) | In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the Netherlands received on 26 September 2008 an application from BASF SE for the inclusion of the active substance ametoctradin in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Decision 2009/535/EC confirmed that the dossier was ‘complete’ in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the Netherlands received on 26 September 2008 an application from BASF SE for the inclusion of the active substance ametoctradin in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Decision 2009/535/EC confirmed that the dossier was ‘complete’ in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (3) | For that active substance, the effects on human and animal health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicant. The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 15 September 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

For that active substance, the effects on human and animal health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicant. The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 15 September 2009.

| (4) | The draft assessment report was reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’). The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ametoctradin (4) on 18 October 2012. The draft assessment report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and was finalised on 1 February 2013 in the format of the Commission review report for ametoctradin. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The draft assessment report was reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’). The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ametoctradin (4) on 18 October 2012. The draft assessment report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and was finalised on 1 February 2013 in the format of the Commission review report for ametoctradin.

| (5) | It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing ametoctradin may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) and Article 5(3) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report. It is therefore appropriate to approve ametoctradin. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing ametoctradin may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) and Article 5(3) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report. It is therefore appropriate to approve ametoctradin.

| (6) | A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before approval in order to permit Member States and the interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements resulting from the approval. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before approval in order to permit Member States and the interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements resulting from the approval.

| (7) | Without prejudice to the obligations provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 as a consequence of approval, taking into account the specific situation created by the transition from Directive 91/414/EEC to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the following should, however, apply. Member States should be allowed a period of six months after approval to review authorisations of plant protection products containing ametoctradin. Member States should, as appropriate, vary, replace or withdraw authorisations. By way of derogation from that deadline, a longer period should be provided for the submission and assessment of the update of the complete Annex III dossier, as set out in Directive 91/414/EEC, of each plant protection product for each intended use in accordance with the uniform principles. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Without prejudice to the obligations provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 as a consequence of approval, taking into account the specific situation created by the transition from Directive 91/414/EEC to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the following should, however, apply. Member States should be allowed a period of six months after approval to review authorisations of plant protection products containing ametoctradin. Member States should, as appropriate, vary, replace or withdraw authorisations. By way of derogation from that deadline, a longer period should be provided for the submission and assessment of the update of the complete Annex III dossier, as set out in Directive 91/414/EEC, of each plant protection product for each intended use in accordance with the uniform principles.

| (8) | The experience gained from inclusions in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of active substances assessed in the framework of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8 (2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (5) has shown that difficulties can arise in interpreting the duties of holders of existing authorisations in relation to access to data. In order to avoid further difficulties it therefore appears necessary to clarify the duties of the Member States, especially the duty to verify that the holder of an authorisation demonstrates access to a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive. However, this clarification does not impose any new obligations on Member States or holders of authorisations compared to the Directives which have been adopted until now amending Annex I to that Directive or the Regulations approving active substances. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The experience gained from inclusions in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of active substances assessed in the framework of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8 (2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (5) has shown that difficulties can arise in interpreting the duties of holders of existing authorisations in relation to access to data. In order to avoid further difficulties it therefore appears necessary to clarify the duties of the Member States, especially the duty to verify that the holder of an authorisation demonstrates access to a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive. However, this clarification does not impose any new obligations on Member States or holders of authorisations compared to the Directives which have been adopted until now amending Annex I to that Directive or the Regulations approving active substances.

| (9) | In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances (6) should be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances (6) should be amended accordingly.

| (10) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Approval of active substance

The active substance ametoctradin, as specified in Annex I, is approved subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

Re-evaluation of plant protection products

1.   Member States shall in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing ametoctradin as an active substance by 31 January 2014.

By that date they shall in particular verify that the conditions in Annex I to this Regulation are met, with the exception of those identified in the column on specific provisions of that Annex, and that the holder of the authorisation has, or has access to, a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to Directive 91/414/EEC in accordance with the conditions of Article 13(1) to (4) of that Directive and Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.

2.   By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing ametoctradin as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances, all of which were listed in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 by 31 July 2013 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC and taking into account the column on specific provisions of Annex I to this Regulation. On the basis of that evaluation, they shall determine whether the product satisfies the conditions set out in Article 29(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.

Following that determination Member States shall:

| (a) | in the case of a product containing ametoctradin as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 January 2015 at the latest; or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

in the case of a product containing ametoctradin as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 January 2015 at the latest; or

| (b) | in the case of a product containing ametoctradin as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 January 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective act or acts which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC or approved that substance or substances, whichever is the latest. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in the case of a product containing ametoctradin as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 January 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective act or acts which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC or approved that substance or substances, whichever is the latest.

Article 3

Amendments to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011

The Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Regulation.

Article 4

Entry into force and date of application

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

It shall apply from 1 August 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 179, 10.7.2009, p. 66.

3

(4)  
  EFSA Journal 2012; 10(11):2921. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu

4

EFSA Journal

(5)  
  OJ L 366, 15.12.1992, p. 10.

5

(6)  
  OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p. 1.

6

---

ANNEX I

| Common name, identification numbers | IUPAC name | Purity (1) | Date of approval | Expiration of approval | Specific provisions |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ametoctradin
  CAS No 865318-97-4
  CIPAC No 818 | 5-ethyl-6-octyl [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidin-7-amine | ≥ 980 g/kg
  The impurities amitrole and o-xylene are of toxicological relevance and shall not exceed 50 g/kg and 2 g/kg respectively in the technical material. | 1 August 2013 | 31 July 2023 | For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on ametoctradin, and in particular Appendices I and II thereto, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 1 February 2013 shall be taken into account.
  In this overall assessment Member States shall pay particular attention to the leakage of metabolite M650F04 (2) to groundwater under vulnerable conditions.
  Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate. |

Common name, identification numbers

IUPAC name

Purity (1)

Date of approval

Expiration of approval

Specific provisions

Ametoctradin

CAS No 865318-97-4

CIPAC No 818

5-ethyl-6-octyl [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidin-7-amine

≥ 980 g/kg

The impurities amitrole and o-xylene are of toxicological relevance and shall not exceed 50 g/kg and 2 g/kg respectively in the technical material.

1 August 2013

31 July 2023

For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on ametoctradin, and in particular Appendices I and II thereto, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 1 February 2013 shall be taken into account.

In this overall assessment Member States shall pay particular attention to the leakage of metabolite M650F04 (2) to groundwater under vulnerable conditions.

Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.

---

(1)  Further details on identity and specification of active substance are provided in the review report.

(2)  7-amino-5-ethyl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-6-carboxylic acid.

---

ANNEX II

In Part B of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, the following entry is added:

| ‘33 | Ametoctradin
  CAS No 865318-97-4
  CIPAC No 818 | 5-ethyl-6-octyl [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidin-7-amine | ≥ 980 g/kg
  The impurities amitrole and o-xylene are of toxicological relevance and shall not exceed 50 g/kg and 2 g/kg respectively in the technical material. | 1 August 2013 | 31 July 2023 | For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on ametoctradin, and in particular Appendices I and II thereto, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 1 February 2013 shall be taken into account.
  In this overall assessment Member States shall pay particular attention to the leakage of metabolite M650F04 (*1) to groundwater under vulnerable conditions.
  Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘33

Ametoctradin

CAS No 865318-97-4

CIPAC No 818

5-ethyl-6-octyl [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidin-7-amine

≥ 980 g/kg

The impurities amitrole and o-xylene are of toxicological relevance and shall not exceed 50 g/kg and 2 g/kg respectively in the technical material.

1 August 2013

31 July 2023

For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on ametoctradin, and in particular Appendices I and II thereto, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 1 February 2013 shall be taken into account.

In this overall assessment Member States shall pay particular attention to the leakage of metabolite M650F04 (*1) to groundwater under vulnerable conditions.

Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.

---

(*1)  7-amino-5-ethyl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-6-carboxylic acid.’

*1

---

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/6

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 201/2013

of 8 March 2013

amending Implementing Regulations (EU) No 788/2011 and (EU) No 540/2011 as regards an extension of the uses for which the active substance fluazifop-P is approved

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular Article 13(2)(c) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2011 of 5 August 2011 approving the active substance fluazifop-P, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 and Commission Decision 2008/934/EC (2) the active substance fluazifop-P was approved. The approval included the special provision ‘only uses as herbicide for orchards (basal application) with one application every year may be authorised’. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2011 of 5 August 2011 approving the active substance fluazifop-P, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 and Commission Decision 2008/934/EC (2) the active substance fluazifop-P was approved. The approval included the special provision ‘only uses as herbicide for orchards (basal application) with one application every year may be authorised’.

| (2) | On 29 June 2011 Syngenta Crop Protection AG, at whose request fluazifop-P had been approved, submitted an application for an amendment to the conditions of approval of the active substance fluazifop-P to allow uses as a herbicide to be authorised without restriction. That application was accompanied by information relating to the requested extension of uses. It was submitted to France, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 29 June 2011 Syngenta Crop Protection AG, at whose request fluazifop-P had been approved, submitted an application for an amendment to the conditions of approval of the active substance fluazifop-P to allow uses as a herbicide to be authorised without restriction. That application was accompanied by information relating to the requested extension of uses. It was submitted to France, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 (3).

| (3) | France assessed the information submitted by the applicant and prepared an addendum to the draft assessment report. It submitted that addendum to the Commission, with a copy to the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, on 2 April 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

France assessed the information submitted by the applicant and prepared an addendum to the draft assessment report. It submitted that addendum to the Commission, with a copy to the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, on 2 April 2012.

| (4) | The Authority circulated the addendum to the applicant and the Member States, with the exception of the rapporteur Member State, and made it available to the public, allowing a period of 60 days for the submission of written comments. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Authority circulated the addendum to the applicant and the Member States, with the exception of the rapporteur Member State, and made it available to the public, allowing a period of 60 days for the submission of written comments.

| (5) | The Authority organised an expert consultation as regards mammalian toxicology. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Authority organised an expert consultation as regards mammalian toxicology.

| (6) | Taking into account the addendum to the draft assessment report, the Authority adopted its conclusion on fluazifop-P on 18 October 2012 (4), as regards its unrestricted use as a herbicide. It communicated that conclusion to the applicant, the Member States and the Commission and made it available to the public. The draft assessment report, the addendum thereto and that conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 1 February 2013 in the format of the Commission review report for fluazifop-P. The applicant was given the possibility to submit comments on the review report. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Taking into account the addendum to the draft assessment report, the Authority adopted its conclusion on fluazifop-P on 18 October 2012 (4), as regards its unrestricted use as a herbicide. It communicated that conclusion to the applicant, the Member States and the Commission and made it available to the public. The draft assessment report, the addendum thereto and that conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 1 February 2013 in the format of the Commission review report for fluazifop-P. The applicant was given the possibility to submit comments on the review report.

| (7) | It has appeared from the information submitted by the applicant that allowing uses as a herbicide to be authorised without restriction does not cause any risks in addition to those already taken into account in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2011 and in the Commission review report on which that Implementing Regulation was based. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

It has appeared from the information submitted by the applicant that allowing uses as a herbicide to be authorised without restriction does not cause any risks in addition to those already taken into account in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2011 and in the Commission review report on which that Implementing Regulation was based.

| (8) | On the basis of the review report, as finalised on 1 February 2013 and of the conclusion by the Authority adopted on 18 October 2012, it is appropriate to extend the approval of fluazifop-P to cover uses as a herbicide without restriction. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

On the basis of the review report, as finalised on 1 February 2013 and of the conclusion by the Authority adopted on 18 October 2012, it is appropriate to extend the approval of fluazifop-P to cover uses as a herbicide without restriction.

| (9) | In order to take into account the remaining uncertainty on the calculation of the degradation half time of the metabolite Compound X (5) Member States should pay particular attention to consumer safety as regards the occurrence in groundwater of that metabolite. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

In order to take into account the remaining uncertainty on the calculation of the degradation half time of the metabolite Compound X (5) Member States should pay particular attention to consumer safety as regards the occurrence in groundwater of that metabolite.

| (10) | Implementing Regulations (EU) No 788/2011 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (6) should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Implementing Regulations (EU) No 788/2011 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (6) should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (11) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2011

Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2011 is amended in accordance with Annex I to this Regulation.

Article 2

Amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011

The Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Regulation.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 203, 6.8.2011, p. 21.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 224, 21.8.2002, p. 23.

3

(4)  
  European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluazifop-P. EFSA Journal 2012;10(11):2945. [18 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2945. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal

4

European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluazifop-P. EFSA Journal 2012;10(11):2945. [18 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2945. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal

(5)  5-(trifluoromethyl)-2(1H)-pyridinone.

5

(6)  
  OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p. 1.

6

---

ANNEX I

The column ‘Specific provisions’ in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2011 is replaced by the following:

‘PART A

Only uses as herbicide may be authorised.

PART B

For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on fluazifop-P, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 1 February 2013, shall be taken into account.

In this overall assessment Member States shall:

| — | pay particular attention to consumer safety as regards the occurrence in groundwater of the metabolite compound X (*1); |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to consumer safety as regards the occurrence in groundwater of the metabolite compound X (*1);

| — | pay particular attention to operator safety and shall ensure that conditions of use include the application of adequate personal protective equipment, where appropriate; |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to operator safety and shall ensure that conditions of use include the application of adequate personal protective equipment, where appropriate;

| — | pay particular attention to the protection of surface water and groundwater in vulnerable zones; |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to the protection of surface water and groundwater in vulnerable zones;

| — | pay particular attention to the risk for non-target plants. |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to the risk for non-target plants.

Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.

The applicant shall submit confirmatory information as regards:

| (1) | the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, including information on the relevance of the impurity R154719; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, including information on the relevance of the impurity R154719;

| (2) | the equivalence between the specifications of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, and the specifications of the test material used in the toxicity studies; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

the equivalence between the specifications of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, and the specifications of the test material used in the toxicity studies;

| (3) | the potential long-term risk to herbivorous mammals; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

the potential long-term risk to herbivorous mammals;

| (4) | the fate and behaviour in the environment of the metabolite compounds X (*1) and IV (*2); |
| --- | --- |

(4)

the fate and behaviour in the environment of the metabolite compounds X (*1) and IV (*2);

| (5) | the potential risk to fish and aquatic invertebrates for the metabolite compound IV (*2). |
| --- | --- |

(5)

the potential risk to fish and aquatic invertebrates for the metabolite compound IV (*2).

The applicant shall submit to the Commission, the Member States and the Authority the information set out in points (1) and (2) by 30 June 2012 and the information set out in points (3), (4) and (5) by 31 December 2013.

---

(*1)  5-(trifluoromethyl)-2(1H)-pyridinone.

*1

(*2)  4-{[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy}phenol..’

*2

---

ANNEX II

The column ‘Specific provisions’ of row 15, fluazifop-P, of Part B of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is replaced by the following:

‘PART A

Only uses as herbicide may be authorised.

PART B

For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on fluazifop-P, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 1 February 2013, shall be taken into account.

In this overall assessment Member States shall:

| — | pay particular attention to consumer safety as regards the occurrence in groundwater of the metabolite compound X (*1); |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to consumer safety as regards the occurrence in groundwater of the metabolite compound X (*1);

| — | pay particular attention to operator safety and shall ensure that conditions of use include the application of adequate personal protective equipment, where appropriate; |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to operator safety and shall ensure that conditions of use include the application of adequate personal protective equipment, where appropriate;

| — | pay particular attention to the protection of surface water and groundwater in vulnerable zones; |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to the protection of surface water and groundwater in vulnerable zones;

| — | pay particular attention to the risk for non-target plants. |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to the risk for non-target plants.

Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.

The applicant shall submit confirmatory information as regards:

| (1) | the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, including information on the relevance of the impurity R154719; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, including information on the relevance of the impurity R154719;

| (2) | the equivalence between the specifications of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, and the specifications of the test material used in the toxicity studies; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

the equivalence between the specifications of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, and the specifications of the test material used in the toxicity studies;

| (3) | the potential long-term risk to herbivorous mammals; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

the potential long-term risk to herbivorous mammals;

| (4) | the fate and behaviour in the environment of the metabolite compounds X (*1) and IV (*2); |
| --- | --- |

(4)

the fate and behaviour in the environment of the metabolite compounds X (*1) and IV (*2);

| (5) | the potential risk to fish and aquatic invertebrates for the metabolite compound IV (*2). |
| --- | --- |

(5)

the potential risk to fish and aquatic invertebrates for the metabolite compound IV (*2).

The applicant shall submit to the Commission, the Member States and the Authority the information set out in points (1) and (2) by 30 June 2012 and the information set out in points (3), (4) and (5) by 31 December 2013.

---

(*1)  5-(trifluoromethyl)-2(1H)-pyridinone.

*1

(*2)  4-{[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy}phenol.’

*2

---

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/10

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 202/2013

of 8 March 2013

amending Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 as regards the submission of support programmes in the wine sector and trade with third countries

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 103za, in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 103n(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 foresees that, by 1 August 2013, Member States may decide to reduce, from 2015, the amount available for the support programmes referred to in Annex Xb in order to increase their national ceilings for directs payments referred to in Article 40 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers (2). The amount resulting from the decrease is to remain definitively in the national ceilings for direct payments and no longer be available for the measures listed in Articles 103p to 103y of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 103n(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 foresees that, by 1 August 2013, Member States may decide to reduce, from 2015, the amount available for the support programmes referred to in Annex Xb in order to increase their national ceilings for directs payments referred to in Article 40 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers (2). The amount resulting from the decrease is to remain definitively in the national ceilings for direct payments and no longer be available for the measures listed in Articles 103p to 103y of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.

| (2) | Article 103o of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 foresees that Member States were to decide by 1 December 2012 whether to provide support to vine-growers for 2014 by allocating payment entitlements within the meaning of Chapter 1 of Title III of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. In this case, Member States are to make provision for such support in their support programmes and this support for 2014 is to remain in the Single Payment Scheme and no longer be available for the measures in Articles 103p to 103y of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. Commission Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 (3) should provide details on the communications to be made by the Member States concerned in relation to Article 103n(1a) and Article 103o of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 103o of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 foresees that Member States were to decide by 1 December 2012 whether to provide support to vine-growers for 2014 by allocating payment entitlements within the meaning of Chapter 1 of Title III of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. In this case, Member States are to make provision for such support in their support programmes and this support for 2014 is to remain in the Single Payment Scheme and no longer be available for the measures in Articles 103p to 103y of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. Commission Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 (3) should provide details on the communications to be made by the Member States concerned in relation to Article 103n(1a) and Article 103o of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.

| (3) | In the light of the experience gained during the implementation of the support programmes and in order to prepare for the submission of draft support programmes for the financial years 2014 to 2018, the framework and specific requirements for the new programming period should be further completed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In the light of the experience gained during the implementation of the support programmes and in order to prepare for the submission of draft support programmes for the financial years 2014 to 2018, the framework and specific requirements for the new programming period should be further completed.

| (4) | Point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 provides that the wines referred to in Article 103p(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be eligible for promotion on third-country markets provided that the support for promotion and information lasts no longer than three years for a given beneficiary in a given third country, if necessary renewed once for a period no longer than two years. This provision has been applied for the first submission of the support programme and it is appropriate to provide a similar rule for the submission of the new support programme; however, it is important to stimulate the opening of new markets in third countries, including by giving preference to beneficiaries who did not receive support in the past, or to those targeting a new third country for which they have not received support in the past within this scheme. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 provides that the wines referred to in Article 103p(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be eligible for promotion on third-country markets provided that the support for promotion and information lasts no longer than three years for a given beneficiary in a given third country, if necessary renewed once for a period no longer than two years. This provision has been applied for the first submission of the support programme and it is appropriate to provide a similar rule for the submission of the new support programme; however, it is important to stimulate the opening of new markets in third countries, including by giving preference to beneficiaries who did not receive support in the past, or to those targeting a new third country for which they have not received support in the past within this scheme.

| (5) | The third paragraph of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 provides that, when selecting the beneficiaries, preference is to be given to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (4) and to collective brand names. The preference for collective brand names should be eliminated in order to simplify the implementation of this measure, while leaving the possibility to grant support for the promotion of brand names unaffected. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The third paragraph of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 provides that, when selecting the beneficiaries, preference is to be given to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (4) and to collective brand names. The preference for collective brand names should be eliminated in order to simplify the implementation of this measure, while leaving the possibility to grant support for the promotion of brand names unaffected.

| (6) | Articles 6 and 8 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 establish rules concerning the definition, the procedure, applications and levels of support for restructuring and conversion of vineyards. Without prejudice to the conditions set out in Article 103q of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, in the light of the experience gained during the implementation of this measure, it is necessary to specify certain operations that are considered ineligible. Furthermore, the rules on the calculation of flat rate amounts should, on the one hand, be simplified and, on the other, be made more precise. In particular, in order to avoid overcompensation, it is appropriate to specify that flat rate amounts shall be based on an accurate calculation of the actual costs of each type of operation. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Articles 6 and 8 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 establish rules concerning the definition, the procedure, applications and levels of support for restructuring and conversion of vineyards. Without prejudice to the conditions set out in Article 103q of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, in the light of the experience gained during the implementation of this measure, it is necessary to specify certain operations that are considered ineligible. Furthermore, the rules on the calculation of flat rate amounts should, on the one hand, be simplified and, on the other, be made more precise. In particular, in order to avoid overcompensation, it is appropriate to specify that flat rate amounts shall be based on an accurate calculation of the actual costs of each type of operation.

| (7) | Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 establishes transitional rules concerning restructuring operations already planned in application to Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (5). Those rules are now outdated and that Article should therefore be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 establishes transitional rules concerning restructuring operations already planned in application to Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (5). Those rules are now outdated and that Article should therefore be deleted.

| (8) | Articles 26 to 34 establish rules for three measures which ended on 31 July 2012, potable alcohol distillation, crisis distillation and use of concentrated grape must. Those Articles should therefore be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Articles 26 to 34 establish rules for three measures which ended on 31 July 2012, potable alcohol distillation, crisis distillation and use of concentrated grape must. Those Articles should therefore be deleted.

| (9) | Articles 67 to 73 establish rules for the grubbing-up scheme which ended in 2011. Those Articles should therefore be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Articles 67 to 73 establish rules for the grubbing-up scheme which ended in 2011. Those Articles should therefore be deleted.

| (10) | Article 77(5) of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 foresees that, for investment measures, Articles 26, 27 and 28 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 (6) should apply mutatis mutandis. However, in the light of Article 19(1) and Articles 76 to 80 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008, the reference to some of those rules, which are now set out in Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 (7), should be deleted in order to improve clarity. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Article 77(5) of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 foresees that, for investment measures, Articles 26, 27 and 28 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 (6) should apply mutatis mutandis. However, in the light of Article 19(1) and Articles 76 to 80 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008, the reference to some of those rules, which are now set out in Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 (7), should be deleted in order to improve clarity.

| (11) | Article 81(3) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 foresees rules on controls related to the production potential and to the operations of restructuring and conversion of vineyards, for areas receiving a grubbing-up premium in accordance with Articles 85o to 85x of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. The grubbing-up scheme ended in 2011. Therefore, those rules should be deleted. However, Article 81(4) foresees an on-the-spot control or a remote sensing control in case of grubbing-up, if its resolution is equal to or higher than 1 m2 or the grubbing-up covers the entire vineyard parcel. Grubbing-up before replanting can also be an operation carried out in the framework of a restructuring and conversion measure and therefore it is appropriate to foresee the same rule for this measure. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Article 81(3) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 foresees rules on controls related to the production potential and to the operations of restructuring and conversion of vineyards, for areas receiving a grubbing-up premium in accordance with Articles 85o to 85x of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. The grubbing-up scheme ended in 2011. Therefore, those rules should be deleted. However, Article 81(4) foresees an on-the-spot control or a remote sensing control in case of grubbing-up, if its resolution is equal to or higher than 1 m2 or the grubbing-up covers the entire vineyard parcel. Grubbing-up before replanting can also be an operation carried out in the framework of a restructuring and conversion measure and therefore it is appropriate to foresee the same rule for this measure.

| (12) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001 (8) provided the simplified VI-1 document for wine products, including grape juice originating in a list of countries, including the United States of America, and imported into the Union. Since the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on trade in wine (9), wine from the United States of America can be imported into the Union accompanied by a certification document as provided for in Article 9 of the Agreement. In consequence, in Regulation (EC) No 555/2008, which replaced Regulation (EC) No 883/2001, the United States of America were not included in the list of countries allowed to use the simplified VI-1 document. However, as grape juice is not covered by that Agreement, the United States of America should be added to that list for the benefit of wine products not covered by the scope of the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001 (8) provided the simplified VI-1 document for wine products, including grape juice originating in a list of countries, including the United States of America, and imported into the Union. Since the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on trade in wine (9), wine from the United States of America can be imported into the Union accompanied by a certification document as provided for in Article 9 of the Agreement. In consequence, in Regulation (EC) No 555/2008, which replaced Regulation (EC) No 883/2001, the United States of America were not included in the list of countries allowed to use the simplified VI-1 document. However, as grape juice is not covered by that Agreement, the United States of America should be added to that list for the benefit of wine products not covered by the scope of the Agreement.

| (13) | The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 is amended as follows:

| (1) | in Article 2, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

  ‘3.   Member States deciding to reduce, from the 2015 financial year onwards, the amount available for the support programmes in order to increase their national ceilings for direct payments referred to in Article 40 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (*1), shall notify these amounts before 1 August 2013. The data submitted in the forms provided in Annexes I, II, III, VII and VIII shall be adapted accordingly if that decrease had not been already foreseen in the draft support programme presented by 1 March 2013.


  (*1)  
  OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 16.’;" |
| --- | --- |

(1)

in Article 2, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

‘3.   Member States deciding to reduce, from the 2015 financial year onwards, the amount available for the support programmes in order to increase their national ceilings for direct payments referred to in Article 40 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (*1), shall notify these amounts before 1 August 2013. The data submitted in the forms provided in Annexes I, II, III, VII and VIII shall be adapted accordingly if that decrease had not been already foreseen in the draft support programme presented by 1 March 2013.

(*1)  
  OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 16.’;"

*1

| (2) | Article 4 is amended as follows:






  (a) | in the first paragraph, point (d) is replaced by the following:






  ‘(d) | for each programming period, the support for the promotion and information lasts no longer than three years for a given beneficiary in a given third-country; however, if necessary, it may be renewed once, for a period no longer than two years;’; |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(2)

Article 4 is amended as follows:

(a)

in the first paragraph, point (d) is replaced by the following:

‘(d)

for each programming period, the support for the promotion and information lasts no longer than three years for a given beneficiary in a given third-country; however, if necessary, it may be renewed once, for a period no longer than two years;’;

| (b) | the third paragraph is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the third paragraph is deleted;

| (3) | in Article 5, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

  ‘3.   Having examined the applications, Member States shall select those offering the best value for money. Preference shall be given to:






  (a) | micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (*2); |
| --- | --- | --- |

(3)

in Article 5, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

‘3.   Having examined the applications, Member States shall select those offering the best value for money. Preference shall be given to:

(a)

micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (*2);

| (b) | new beneficiaries who did not receive support in the past; and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

new beneficiaries who did not receive support in the past; and

| (c) | beneficiaries targeting a new third country for which they have not received support in the past within this scheme.
  Member States shall draw up a list within the limit of available funds and shall communicate that list to the Commission using the form set out in Annex VIII in order to allow the other Member States to be informed and to increase coherence of the measure. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

beneficiaries targeting a new third country for which they have not received support in the past within this scheme.

Member States shall draw up a list within the limit of available funds and shall communicate that list to the Commission using the form set out in Annex VIII in order to allow the other Member States to be informed and to increase coherence of the measure.

(*2)  
  OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36.’;"

*2

| (4) | Article 6 is replaced by the following:

  ‘Article 6
  Ineligible operations

  1.   For the purposes of the second subparagraph of Article 103q(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, “the normal renewal of vineyards which have come to the end of their natural life” shall mean the replanting of the same parcel of land with the same variety according to the same system of vine cultivation. Member States may establish further specifications, especially as regards to the age of the vineyards replaced.


  2.   The following operations are not eligible:






  (a) | day-to-day management of a vineyard; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(4)

Article 6 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 6

Ineligible operations

1.   For the purposes of the second subparagraph of Article 103q(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, “the normal renewal of vineyards which have come to the end of their natural life” shall mean the replanting of the same parcel of land with the same variety according to the same system of vine cultivation. Member States may establish further specifications, especially as regards to the age of the vineyards replaced.

2.   The following operations are not eligible:

(a)

day-to-day management of a vineyard;

| (b) | protection against damage by game, birds or hail; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

protection against damage by game, birds or hail;

| (c) | construction of windbreaks and wind protection walls; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

construction of windbreaks and wind protection walls;

| (d) | driveways and elevators.’; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

driveways and elevators.’;

| (5) | Article 8 is replaced by the following:

  ‘Article 8
  Levels of support

  1.   Subject to the provisions of Article 103q of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and of this Chapter, Member States shall lay down rules setting out the eligible restructuring and conversion actions and their respective eligible costs. The rules shall be designed to ensure that the objective of the scheme is met.
  The rules may provide in particular either for the payment of flat-rate amounts, or for maximum levels of support per hectare. In addition, the rules may provide for the adjustment of the support on the basis of objective criteria.


  2.   In order to avoid overcompensation, where Member States make use of flat rate amounts, these shall be established on the basis of an accurate calculation of the actual costs of each type of operation. Flat rate amounts may be adapted annually if justified.


  3.   The support is paid for the area planted, defined in conformity with Article 75(1).’; |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Article 8 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 8

Levels of support

1.   Subject to the provisions of Article 103q of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and of this Chapter, Member States shall lay down rules setting out the eligible restructuring and conversion actions and their respective eligible costs. The rules shall be designed to ensure that the objective of the scheme is met.

The rules may provide in particular either for the payment of flat-rate amounts, or for maximum levels of support per hectare. In addition, the rules may provide for the adjustment of the support on the basis of objective criteria.

2.   In order to avoid overcompensation, where Member States make use of flat rate amounts, these shall be established on the basis of an accurate calculation of the actual costs of each type of operation. Flat rate amounts may be adapted annually if justified.

3.   The support is paid for the area planted, defined in conformity with Article 75(1).’;

| (6) | Article 10 is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Article 10 is deleted;

| (7) | Articles 26 to 34 are deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Articles 26 to 34 are deleted;

| (8) | in Article 35, paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:

  ‘6.   Member States deciding to transfer, for 2014 and from 2015 onwards, the entire amount of their national envelope for the support programmes in order to increase their national ceilings for direct payments referred to in Article 40 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, shall not be required to submit the forms set out in Annexes V to VIIIc to this Regulation.’; |
| --- | --- |

(8)

in Article 35, paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:

‘6.   Member States deciding to transfer, for 2014 and from 2015 onwards, the entire amount of their national envelope for the support programmes in order to increase their national ceilings for direct payments referred to in Article 40 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, shall not be required to submit the forms set out in Annexes V to VIIIc to this Regulation.’;

| (9) | in Article 43(2), the introductory phrase of the second subparagraph is replaced by:

  ‘In the case of wine put up in labelled containers of a capacity not exceeding 60 litres, fitted with non-reusable closing devices, and provided that the wine originates in a country appearing in Annex XII, part A, which has offered special guarantees accepted by the Community, the analysis report section of the V I 1 form need be completed only in respect of:’; |
| --- | --- |

(9)

in Article 43(2), the introductory phrase of the second subparagraph is replaced by:

‘In the case of wine put up in labelled containers of a capacity not exceeding 60 litres, fitted with non-reusable closing devices, and provided that the wine originates in a country appearing in Annex XII, part A, which has offered special guarantees accepted by the Community, the analysis report section of the V I 1 form need be completed only in respect of:’;

| (10) | Article 45 is amended as follows:






  (a) | paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

  ‘1.   V I 1 documents made out by wine producers in the third countries listed in Annex XII, Part B, which have offered special guarantees accepted by the Community shall be considered as certificates or analysis reports drawn up by agencies and laboratories included in the list provided for in Article 48 provided that the producers have received individual approval from the competent authorities of those third countries and are subject to inspection by the latter.’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(10)

Article 45 is amended as follows:

(a)

paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1.   V I 1 documents made out by wine producers in the third countries listed in Annex XII, Part B, which have offered special guarantees accepted by the Community shall be considered as certificates or analysis reports drawn up by agencies and laboratories included in the list provided for in Article 48 provided that the producers have received individual approval from the competent authorities of those third countries and are subject to inspection by the latter.’;

| (b) | in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, point (a) is replaced by the following:






  ‘(a) | in box 1, their names and addresses and their registration numbers in the third countries listed in Annex XII, Part B;’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, point (a) is replaced by the following:

‘(a)

in box 1, their names and addresses and their registration numbers in the third countries listed in Annex XII, Part B;’;

| (11) | Articles 67 to 73 are deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Articles 67 to 73 are deleted;

| (12) | in Article 77, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following:

  ‘5.   Concerning measures foreseen by Article 103u of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, Article 24(1) to (3) and (6), and Article 26(1) and (2) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 (*3) shall apply mutatis mutandis.


  (*3)  
  OJ L 25, 28.1.2011, p. 8.’;" |
| --- | --- |

(12)

in Article 77, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following:

‘5.   Concerning measures foreseen by Article 103u of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, Article 24(1) to (3) and (6), and Article 26(1) and (2) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 (*3) shall apply mutatis mutandis.

(*3)  
  OJ L 25, 28.1.2011, p. 8.’;"

*3

| (13) | Article 81 is amended as follows:






  (a) | paragraphs 3 and 5 are deleted; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(13)

Article 81 is amended as follows:

(a)

paragraphs 3 and 5 are deleted;

| (b) | paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:

  ‘4.   The control that the grubbing-up, including as an operation of restructuring and conversion of vineyard, has actually taken place, shall be carried out by an on-the-spot check. In the case of grubbing-up of the entire vineyard parcel or if the resolution of the remote sensing is equal to or higher than 1 m2, the control may be carried out by remote sensing.’; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:

‘4.   The control that the grubbing-up, including as an operation of restructuring and conversion of vineyard, has actually taken place, shall be carried out by an on-the-spot check. In the case of grubbing-up of the entire vineyard parcel or if the resolution of the remote sensing is equal to or higher than 1 m2, the control may be carried out by remote sensing.’;

| (14) | Annexes II, III, IV, XII, and XIII are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Annexes II, III, IV, XII, and XIII are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation;

| (15) | Annexes XIV and XV are deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Annexes XIV and XV are deleted.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 16.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 170, 30.6.2008, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1.

5

(6)  
  OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 74.

6

(7)  
  OJ L 25, 28.1.2011, p. 8.

7

(8)  
  OJ L 128, 10.5.2001, p. 1.

8

(9)  
  OJ L 87, 24.3.2006, p. 2.

9

---

ANNEX

Annexes II, III, IV, XII and XIII are amended as follows:

| (1) | in Annex II, point B is replaced by the following:
  ‘B.   Financial years 2014-2018
   (1)













  (in EUR 1000) |
| --- | --- |
| Member State (2): |
| Date of communication (3): |
| | Financial year | |
| Measures | Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Total |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
| 1 - | Single Payment Scheme |

(1)

in Annex II, point B is replaced by the following:

‘B.   Financial years 2014-2018
   (1)

(in EUR 1000)

Member State (2):

Date of communication (3):

Financial year

Measures

Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Total

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1 -

Single Payment Scheme

Article 103o

| 2 - | Promotion on third-country markets |
| --- | --- |

2 -

Promotion on third-country markets

Article 103p

| 3 - | Restructuring and conversion of vineyards |
| --- | --- |

3 -

Restructuring and conversion of vineyards

Article 103q

| 4 - | Green harvesting |
| --- | --- |

4 -

Green harvesting

Article 103r

| 5 - | Mutual funds |
| --- | --- |

5 -

Mutual funds

Article 103s

| 6 - | Harvest insurance |
| --- | --- |

6 -

Harvest insurance

Article 103t

| 7 - | Investments in enterprise |
| --- | --- |

7 -

Investments in enterprise

Article 103u

| 8 - | By-products distillation |
| --- | --- |

8 -

By-products distillation

Article 103v

Total

| (2) | in Annex III, point B is replaced by the following:
  ‘B.   Financial years 2014-2018
   (4)













  (in EUR 1000) |
| --- | --- |
| Member State (5): |
| Region: |
| Date of communication, due by 1 March 2013 at the latest: |
| | Financial year | |
| Measures | Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Total |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
| 1 - | Single Payment Scheme |

(2)

in Annex III, point B is replaced by the following:

‘B.   Financial years 2014-2018
   (4)

(in EUR 1000)

Member State (5):

Region:

Date of communication, due by 1 March 2013 at the latest:

Financial year

Measures

Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Total

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1 -

Single Payment Scheme

Article 103o

| 2 - | Promotion on third-country markets |
| --- | --- |

2 -

Promotion on third-country markets

Article 103p

| 3 - | Restructuring and conversion of vineyards |
| --- | --- |

3 -

Restructuring and conversion of vineyards

Article 103q

| 4 - | Green harvesting |
| --- | --- |

4 -

Green harvesting

Article 103r

| 5 - | Mutual funds |
| --- | --- |

5 -

Mutual funds

Article 103s

| 6 - | Harvest insurance |
| --- | --- |

6 -

Harvest insurance

Article 103t

| 7 - | Investments in enterprise |
| --- | --- |

7 -

Investments in enterprise

Article 103u

| 8 - | By-products distillation |
| --- | --- |

8 -

By-products distillation

Article 103v

Total

| (3) | in Annex IV point B is replaced by the following:
  ‘B.   Financial years 2014-2018














  (in EUR 1000) |
| --- | --- |
| Member State (6): |
| Date of communication (7): | Date of previous communication: |
| Number of this amended table:
  Reason: modification requested by the Commission/modification requested by the Member State (8) |
| | | Financial year | |
| Measures | Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 | | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Total |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
| 1 - | Single Payment Scheme |

(3)

in Annex IV point B is replaced by the following:

‘B.   Financial years 2014-2018

(in EUR 1000)

Member State (6):

Date of communication (7):

Date of previous communication:

Number of this amended table:

Reason: modification requested by the Commission/modification requested by the Member State (8)

Financial year

Measures

Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Total

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

1 -

Single Payment Scheme

Article 103o

| 2 - | Promotion on third-country markets |
| --- | --- |

2 -

Promotion on third-country markets

Article 103p

Previous submission

Amended amount

| 3 - | Restructuring and conversion of vineyards |
| --- | --- |

3 -

Restructuring and conversion of vineyards

Article 103q

Previous submission

Amended amount

| 4 - | Green harvesting |
| --- | --- |

4 -

Green harvesting

Article 103r

Previous submission

Amended amount

| 5 - | Mutual funds |
| --- | --- |

5 -

Mutual funds

Article 103s

Previous submission

Amended amount

| 6 - | Harvest insurance |
| --- | --- |

6 -

Harvest insurance

Article 103t

Previous submission

Amended amount

| 7 - | Investments in enterprise |
| --- | --- |

7 -

Investments in enterprise

Article 103u

Previous submission

Amended amount

| 8 - | By-products distillation |
| --- | --- |

8 -

By-products distillation

Article 103v

Previous submission

Amended amount

Total

Previous submission

Amended amount

| (4) | Annex XII is replaced by the following:



  ‘ANNEX XII

  List of third countries referred to in Article 43(2) and Article 45








  PART A | : | List of third countries referred to in Article 43(2):






  — | Australia |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

(4)

Annex XII is replaced by the following:

‘ANNEX XII

List of third countries referred to in Article 43(2) and Article 45

PART A

:

List of third countries referred to in Article 43(2):

—

Australia

PART B

:

List of third countries referred to in Article 45:

| — | Australia |
| --- | --- |

—

Australia

| — | United States of America’; |
| --- | --- |

—

United States of America’;

| (5) | Tables 2, 4, 5, 6, and 10 to 13 of Annex XIII are deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Tables 2, 4, 5, 6, and 10 to 13 of Annex XIII are deleted.

---

(1)  The amounts also include the expenses of actions launched in the framework of the first five-year programme 2009-2013 and for which payments will be done in the second five-year programme 2014-2018.

1

(2)  OP acronym to be used.

2

(3)  Communication deadline: by 1 March 2013 at the latest for measures 2 to 8.’

3

(4)  The amounts also include the expenses of actions launched in the framework of the first five-year programme 2009-2013 and for which payments will be done in the second five-year programme 2014-2018.

4

(5)  OP acronym to be used.’

5

(6)  OP acronym to be used.

6

(7)  Communication deadline: 1 March and 30 June.

7

(8)  Strikethrough the wrong element.’

8

---

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/17

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 203/2013

of 8 March 2013

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

| (2) | The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | IL | 125,9 |
| MA | 65,5 |
| TN | 72,5 |
| TR | 116,4 |
| ZZ | 95,1 |
| 0707 00 05 | EG | 191,6 |
| MA | 170,1 |
| TR | 167,5 |
| ZZ | 176,4 |
| 0709 93 10 | MA | 49,8 |
| TR | 124,4 |
| ZZ | 87,1 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 53,4 |
| IL | 71,3 |
| MA | 41,0 |
| TN | 57,0 |
| TR | 67,5 |
| ZZ | 58,0 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 76,7 |
| ZZ | 76,7 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 114,1 |
| BR | 77,7 |
| CN | 77,9 |
| MK | 27,2 |
| US | 168,8 |
| ZZ | 93,1 |
| 0808 30 90 | AR | 121,2 |
| CL | 181,6 |
| TR | 171,6 |
| US | 191,0 |
| ZA | 111,7 |
| ZZ | 155,4 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

IL

125,9

MA

65,5

TN

72,5

TR

116,4

ZZ

95,1

0707 00 05

EG

191,6

MA

170,1

TR

167,5

ZZ

176,4

0709 93 10

MA

49,8

TR

124,4

ZZ

87,1

0805 10 20

EG

53,4

IL

71,3

MA

41,0

TN

57,0

TR

67,5

ZZ

58,0

0805 50 10

TR

76,7

ZZ

76,7

0808 10 80

AR

114,1

BR

77,7

CN

77,9

MK

27,2

US

168,8

ZZ

93,1

0808 30 90

AR

121,2

CL

181,6

TR

171,6

US

191,0

ZA

111,7

ZZ

155,4

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/19

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 204/2013

of 8 March 2013

fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 4 to 5 March 2013 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of March 2013

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 3(1) and (2) of Protocol No 1 (3) to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tunisia, of the other part (4), opens a tariff quota at a zero rate of duty for imports of untreated olive oil falling within CN codes 1509 10 10 and 1509 10 90, wholly obtained in Tunisia and transported direct from that country to the European Union, up to the limit laid down for each year. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 3(1) and (2) of Protocol No 1 (3) to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tunisia, of the other part (4), opens a tariff quota at a zero rate of duty for imports of untreated olive oil falling within CN codes 1509 10 10 and 1509 10 90, wholly obtained in Tunisia and transported direct from that country to the European Union, up to the limit laid down for each year.

| (2) | Article 2(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 of 20 December 2006 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quota for olive oil originating in Tunisia (5) lays down monthly quantitative limits for the issue of import licences. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 of 20 December 2006 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quota for olive oil originating in Tunisia (5) lays down monthly quantitative limits for the issue of import licences.

| (3) | Import licence applications have been submitted to the competent authorities under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 in respect of a total quantity exceeding the limit laid down for the month of March in Article 2(2) of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Import licence applications have been submitted to the competent authorities under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 in respect of a total quantity exceeding the limit laid down for the month of March in Article 2(2) of that Regulation.

| (4) | In these circumstances, the Commission must set an allocation coefficient allowing import licences to be issued in proportion to the quantity available. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In these circumstances, the Commission must set an allocation coefficient allowing import licences to be issued in proportion to the quantity available.

| (5) | Since the limit for the month of March has been reached, no more import licences can be issued for that month, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Since the limit for the month of March has been reached, no more import licences can be issued for that month,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications were lodged for 4 and 5 March 2013 under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 15,761228 %.

The issue of import licences in respect of amounts applied for as from 11 March 2013 shall be suspended for March 2013.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 March 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 97, 30.3.1998, p. 57.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 97, 30.3.1998, p. 2.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 365, 21.12.2006, p. 84.

5

---

DECISIONS

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/20

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 26 February 2013

on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)

(notified under document C(2013) 981)

(Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)

(2013/123/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (2), and in particular Article 31 thereof,

Having consulted the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,

Whereas:

| (1) | Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them.

| (2) | The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission.

| (3) | Under Regulations (EC) No 1258/1999 and (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed European Union rules may be financed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Under Regulations (EC) No 1258/1999 and (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed European Union rules may be financed.

| (4) | In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD.

| (5) | The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States.

| (6) | As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with European Union rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with European Union rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject.

| (7) | This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 15 October 2012 and relating to its content, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 15 October 2012 and relating to its content,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States’ accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, under the EAGF or under the EAFRD shall be excluded from European Union financing because it does not comply with European Union rules.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Lithuania, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 26 February 2013.

For the Commission

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

| Member State | Measure | Financial Year | Reason | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BUDGET ITEM: 6701 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2006 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –93 217,10 | 0,00 | –93 217,10 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2007 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 152,33 | 0,00 | 152,33 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2007 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 869 463,15 | 0,00 | – 869 463,15 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 4,89 | 0,00 | 4,89 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 252,09 | 0,00 | 252,09 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 481 485,19 | 0,00 | –1 481 485,19 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, Claim 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 28,08 | 0,00 | 28,08 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 19,78 | 0,00 | 19,78 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 49,34 | 0,00 | 49,34 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2010 | GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –70,55 | 0,00 | –70,55 |
| TOTAL BE | EUR | –2 443 729,48 | 0,00 | –2 443 729,48 |
| CY | Financial audit - Overshooting | 2011 | exceeding of ceilings | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –26,69 | –26,69 | 0,00 |
| TOTAL CY | EUR | –26,69 | –26,69 | 0,00 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2007 | GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 985 525,73 | 0,00 | – 985 525,73 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 355,61 | 0,00 | – 355,61 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 901 569,16 | 0,00 | –1 901 569,16 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –19,89 | 0,00 | –19,89 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 546,95 | 0,00 | –1 546,95 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –2 366 879,57 | 0,00 | –2 366 879,57 |
| TOTAL CZ | EUR | –5 255 896,91 | 0,00 | –5 255 896,91 |
| DK | Irregularities | 2011 | deficiencies in the recovery of a debt case | ONE-OFF | | DKK | – 142 645,00 | 0,00 | – 142 645,00 |
| TOTAL DK | DKK | – 142 645,00 | 0,00 | – 142 645,00 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2007 | forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 969 526,34 | 0,00 | –1 969 526,34 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2007 | deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 435 445,92 | 0,00 | –1 435 445,92 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2007 | deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 718 490,48 | 0,00 | – 718 490,48 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2007 | wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 107 390,07 | 0,00 | – 107 390,07 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2008 | forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –2 140 711,78 | 0,00 | –2 140 711,78 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2008 | deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 441 201,28 | 0,00 | –1 441 201,28 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2008 | deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 721 414,45 | 0,00 | – 721 414,45 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2008 | wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 136 846,50 | 0,00 | – 136 846,50 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2009 | deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 453 007,15 | 0,00 | –1 453 007,15 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2009 | forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –5 060 486,51 | 0,00 | –5 060 486,51 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2009 | deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 687 715,79 | 0,00 | – 687 715,79 |
| ES | Entitlements | 2009 | wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 157 667,86 | 0,00 | – 157 667,86 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2002 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 25,00  % | EUR | – 451 439,06 | 0,00 | – 451 439,06 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2002 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –8 255 792,17 | 0,00 | –8 255 792,17 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2003 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 625 835,59 | 0,00 | – 625 835,59 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2003 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 283 466,31 | 0,00 | – 283 466,31 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2003 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 25,00  % | EUR | – 637 325,71 | 0,00 | – 637 325,71 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2003 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –10 428 368,99 | 0,00 | –10 428 368,99 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2004 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 543 032,76 | 0,00 | – 543 032,76 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2004 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 612 356,11 | 0,00 | – 612 356,11 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2004 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –85 673,90 | 0,00 | –85 673,90 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2004 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 420 186,53 | 0,00 | – 420 186,53 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2004 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 25,00  % | EUR | – 637 325,72 | 0,00 | – 637 325,72 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2004 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –10 428 369,25 | 0,00 | –10 428 369,25 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2005 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 644 593,50 | 0,00 | – 644 593,50 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2005 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –1 197 102,19 | 0,00 | –1 197 102,19 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2005 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –29 829,44 | 0,00 | –29 829,44 |
| ES | Export refunds - other | 2005 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –3 070,58 | 0,00 | –3 070,58 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2005 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –73 612,22 | 0,00 | –73 612,22 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2005 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 25,00  % | EUR | –79 665,71 | 0,00 | –79 665,71 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2005 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –1 303 546,06 | 0,00 | –1 303 546,06 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2006 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 114 829,31 | 0,00 | – 114 829,31 |
| ES | Export refunds - Live animals | 2006 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –12 087,30 | 0,00 | –12 087,30 |
| ES | Export refunds - other | 2006 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 368 662,52 | 0,00 | – 368 662,52 |
| ES | Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose | 2006 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –1 568 548,49 | 0,00 | –1 568 548,49 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2006 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –1 792,30 | 0,00 | –1 792,30 |
| ES | Export refunds - other | 2006 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –1 792,30 | 0,00 | –1 792,30 |
| ES | Export refunds - other | 2006 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 108 785,66 | 0,00 | – 108 785,66 |
| ES | Export refunds - other | 2007 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 233 717,84 | 0,00 | – 233 717,84 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2007 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –9 738,24 | 0,00 | –9 738,24 |
| ES | Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose | 2007 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 883 426,04 | 0,00 | – 883 426,04 |
| ES | Export refunds - other | 2007 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 762,46 | 0,00 | – 762,46 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2007 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 676,14 | 0,00 | – 676,14 |
| ES | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2008 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –47 777,24 | 0,00 | –47 777,24 |
| ES | Export refunds - other | 2008 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 191 108,96 | 0,00 | – 191 108,96 |
| ES | Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose | 2008 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 310 869,70 | 0,00 | – 310 869,70 |
| ES | Export refunds - other | 2008 | deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –1 043,65 | 0,00 | –1 043,65 |
| ES | Irregularities | 2007 | reimbursment due to rectification of the Annex III table for financial year 2006 | ONE-OFF | | EUR | 1 998 905,54 | 0,00 | 1 998 905,54 |
| ES | Irregularities | 2011 | weakness in the recovery procedure of a debt | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 214 008,50 | 0,00 | – 214 008,50 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2006 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –2 049 444,68 | – 470,83 | –2 048 973,85 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2007 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –9 678,62 | 0,00 | –9 678,62 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2007 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 41,87 | 0,00 | 41,87 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2007 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –4 385 343,30 | – 387,58 | –4 384 955,72 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2007 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 181,89 | 0,00 | 181,89 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2008 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –3 017,65 | 0,00 | –3 017,65 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2008 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 0,84 | 0,00 | 0,84 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2008 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –35 502,66 | –2,94 | –35 499,72 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2008 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 50,65 | 0,00 | 50,65 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2009 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –2 196,12 | 0,00 | –2 196,12 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2009 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 30,80 | 0,00 | 30,80 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2009 | 1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 229,56 | 0,00 | –1 229,56 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2009 | 1 GAEC missing, Effectiveness of controls, Application of reduction, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 256,70 | 0,00 | 256,70 |
| TOTAL ES | EUR | –61 327 066,88 | – 861,35 | –61 326 205,53 |
| FI | Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance | 2009 | errors detected during the certification exercise for financial year 2009 in EAGF population | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –64 880,77 | 0,00 | –64 880,77 |
| TOTAL FI | EUR | –64 880,77 | 0,00 | –64 880,77 |
| FR | Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines | 2011 | Late payments | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 138 405,90 | – 138 405,90 | 0,00 |
| FR | Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines | 2011 | Late payments | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –1 233 451,34 | –1 233 451,34 | 0,00 |
| FR | Certification | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 108 312,83 | 0,00 | – 108 312,83 |
| FR | Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats | 2007 | non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –1 552 358,26 | –9 314,14 | –1 543 044,12 |
| FR | Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats | 2008 | non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –1 492 340,47 | 0,00 | –1 492 340,47 |
| FR | Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats | 2009 | non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –1 429 479,12 | 0,00 | –1 429 479,12 |
| FR | Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats | 2010 | non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 109,82 | 0,00 | – 109,82 |
| TOTAL FR | EUR | –5 954 457,74 | –1 381 171,38 | –4 573 286,36 |
| GB | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –27 569 252,08 | –11 938 317,64 | –15 630 934,44 |
| GB | Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops | 2008 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –99 998,30 | 0,00 | –99 998,30 |
| GB | Other Direct Aids | 2008 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –88 938,90 | 0,00 | –88 938,90 |
| GB | Other Direct Aids | 2009 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 107 725,59 | 0,00 | – 107 725,59 |
| GB | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –41 109 525,75 | 0,00 | –41 109 525,75 |
| GB | Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops | 2009 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –31 594,40 | 0,00 | –31 594,40 |
| GB | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –41 490 749,02 | 0,00 | –41 490 749,02 |
| GB | Other Direct Aids | 2010 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 174 763,24 | 0,00 | – 174 763,24 |
| GB | Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops | 2010 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –63 023,44 | 0,00 | –63 023,44 |
| GB | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in the on-the-spot checks and payments and sanctions | EXTRAPOLATED | 5,19  % | EUR | –16 513 582,57 | –1 954 694,52 | –14 558 888,05 |
| GB | Irregularities | 2011 | Deficiencies in the recovery of a debt case | ONE-OFF | | GBP | –1 452 109,17 | 0,00 | –1 452 109,17 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –73 257,36 | 0,00 | –73 257,36 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –4 064,43 | 0,00 | –4 064,43 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 643 405,41 | – 700,40 | –1 642 705,01 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 642 321,16 | 0,00 | – 642 321,16 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 521,54 | 0,00 | – 521,54 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –5 359,10 | 0,00 | –5 359,10 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 712,31 | 0,00 | – 712,31 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 536,91 | 0,00 | – 536,91 |
| TOTAL GB | GBP | –1 452 109,17 | 0,00 | –1 452 109,17 |
| TOTAL GB | EUR | – 129 619 331,51 | –13 893 712,56 | – 115 725 618,95 |
| GR | Financial audit - Overshooting | 2010 | Exceeding of ceilings | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –4 048 593,82 | 0,00 | –4 048 593,82 |
| GR | Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines | 2010 | late payments | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –11 217,98 | –11 217,98 | 0,00 |
| GR | Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines | 2010 | late payments | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –1 148 947,18 | – 375 753,63 | – 773 193,55 |
| GR | Food Aid within the Community | 2006 | Overpaid public storage costs | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –58 833,00 | 0,00 | –58 833,00 |
| GR | Public Storage - Rice | 2006 | Overpaid public storage costs | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 369 174,82 | 0,00 | – 369 174,82 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines | 2007 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 016 633,47 | 0,00 | –1 016 633,47 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines | 2007 | change of the eligibility criteria after the end of the claim year 2006 | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –1 246 345,92 | 0,00 | –1 246 345,92 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines | 2007 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 358 518,51 | 0,00 | – 358 518,51 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines | 2008 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 125 128,34 | 0,00 | – 125 128,34 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines | 2008 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 567 077,51 | 0,00 | – 567 077,51 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines | 2008 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 339 319,37 | 0,00 | – 339 319,37 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines | 2008 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 12,58 | 0,00 | 12,58 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines | 2009 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –23 367,16 | 0,00 | –23 367,16 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines | 2009 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –10 743,31 | 0,00 | –10 743,31 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines | 2009 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 1 998,07 | 0,00 | 1 998,07 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines | 2009 | control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 066,26 | 0,00 | –1 066,26 |
| TOTAL GR | EUR | –9 322 956,00 | – 386 971,61 | –8 935 984,39 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2006 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | HUF | – 281 162 836,10 | –5 622 679,91 | – 275 540 156,19 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2007 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –1 456,02 | –1 403,78 | –52,24 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2007 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –2 836 628,70 | –21 435,09 | –2 815 193,61 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2008 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | 23,59 | 0,00 | 23,59 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2008 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | 387,67 | –32,60 | 420,27 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2008 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –5 428 019,24 | –28 383,73 | –5 399 635,51 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2009 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 101,51 | 0,00 | – 101,51 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2009 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 416,76 | 0,00 | – 416,76 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2009 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –8 066,23 | 0,00 | –8 066,23 |
| TOTAL HU | HUF | – 281 162 836,10 | –5 622 679,91 | – 275 540 156,19 |
| TOTAL HU | EUR | –8 274 277,20 | –51 255,20 | –8 223 022,00 |
| IE | Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines | 2011 | late payments | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –13 215,75 | –13 215,75 | 0,00 |
| IE | Irregularities | 2007 | Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2006 | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –3 606,20 | 0,00 | –3 606,20 |
| IE | Irregularities | 2008 | Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2007 | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –1 048,99 | 0,00 | –1 048,99 |
| IE | Irregularities | 2009 | Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2008 | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –2 109,23 | 0,00 | –2 109,23 |
| IE | Irregularities | 2010 | Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2009 | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 892,44 | 0,00 | – 892,44 |
| IE | Irregularities | 2011 | Negligence in recovering the debt | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –22 624,22 | 0,00 | –22 624,22 |
| TOTAL IE | EUR | –43 496,83 | –13 215,75 | –30 281,08 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –2 140 320,86 | – 521,76 | –2 139 799,10 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –17,57 | 0,00 | –17,57 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –3 799 568,80 | – 877,18 | –3 798 691,62 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2005 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 588,40 | 0,00 | – 588,40 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –7 065 635,65 | –60 023,03 | –7 005 612,62 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –5 975,35 | 0,00 | –5 975,35 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –8 809 763,62 | –53 375,69 | –8 756 387,93 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –19 257,41 | 0,00 | –19 257,41 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –11 214 946,03 | –43 992,23 | –11 170 953,80 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 698 146,26 | 0,00 | – 698 146,26 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –14 331 663,30 | –48 186,16 | –14 283 477,14 |
| IT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 216 402,75 | –74,09 | – 216 328,66 |
| IT | Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines | 2011 | late payments | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –2 458 104,43 | –2 458 104,43 | 0,00 |
| IT | Milk - Quota | 2011 | recovery of milk levy | ONE-OFF | | EUR | 163 991,21 | 163 991,21 | 0,00 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2007 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | –3 248,92 | 0,00 | –3 248,92 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2007 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors) | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | –64 771,05 | 0,00 | –64 771,05 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2008 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | –2 527,19 | 0,00 | –2 527,19 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2008 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors) | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | – 119 653,30 | 0,00 | – 119 653,30 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2009 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | – 445 807,98 | 0,00 | – 445 807,98 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2009 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors) | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | – 118 662,34 | 0,00 | – 118 662,34 |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing | 2005 | Gravely deficient control system, fraud | FLAT RATE | 25,00  % | EUR | –17 098 044,58 | 0,00 | –17 098 044,58 |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing | 2006 | Gravely deficient control system, fraud | FLAT RATE | 25,00  % | EUR | – 817 132,98 | 0,00 | – 817 132,98 |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing | 2007 | Gravely deficient control system, fraud | FLAT RATE | 25,00  % | EUR | 1 201,24 | 0,00 | 1 201,24 |
| IT | Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures | 2006 | no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 318 652,00 | 0,00 | – 318 652,00 |
| IT | Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures | 2006 | delayed on-the-spot checks; insufficient checks of the use of fertilisers | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –50 391,00 | 0,00 | –50 391,00 |
| IT | Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures | 2006 | no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 625 923,00 | 0,00 | – 625 923,00 |
| IT | Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures | 2007 | no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 4 073,00 | 0,00 | 4 073,00 |
| TOTAL IT | EUR | –70 255 939,32 | –2 501 163,36 | –67 754 775,96 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2007 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 26,70 | 0,00 | 26,70 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –28 566,80 | – 545,96 | –28 020,84 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 154 416,57 | 0,00 | – 154 416,57 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC not defined (1st pillar only), claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 404 835,64 | 0,00 | – 404 835,64 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 0,83 | 0,00 | 0,83 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 1 014,70 | 0,00 | 1 014,70 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 216,86 | –3,40 | – 213,46 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 200,95 | 0,00 | – 200,95 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 204 161,54 | 0,00 | – 204 161,54 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC not defined (1st pillar only), claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 468 159,50 | 0,00 | – 468 159,50 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –0,01 | 0,00 | –0,01 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 164,08 | 0,00 | 164,08 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 37,58 | 0,00 | 37,58 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –13,95 | 0,00 | –13,95 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –24,21 | 0,00 | –24,21 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 188,77 | 0,00 | – 188,77 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 5,41 | 0,00 | 5,41 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 29,86 | 0,00 | 29,86 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 29,88 | 0,00 | 29,88 |
| TOTAL LT | EUR | –1 259 475,76 | – 549,36 | –1 258 926,40 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –7 853,65 | 0,00 | –7 853,65 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –20,61 | 0,00 | –20,61 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –13 568,05 | 0,00 | –13 568,05 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –2,90 | 0,00 | –2,90 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –88,08 | 0,00 | –88,08 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –16 838,20 | 0,00 | –16 838,20 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 142,32 | 0,00 | 142,32 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –26,86 | 0,00 | –26,86 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –26,01 | 0,00 | –26,01 |
| TOTAL MT | EUR | –38 282,04 | 0,00 | –38 282,04 |
| NL | Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance | 2010 | known error related to the use of bumble bees for pollination | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 688 510,00 | 0,00 | – 688 510,00 |
| TOTAL NL | EUR | – 688 510,00 | 0,00 | – 688 510,00 |
| PL | Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing | 2007 | weaknesses in the controls checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | PLN | –1 166 100,45 | –8 151,74 | –1 157 948,71 |
| PL | Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing | 2007 | late payments | ONE-OFF | | PLN | – 163 034,87 | 0,00 | – 163 034,87 |
| PL | Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing | 2008 | weaknesses in the controls checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 340 453,82 | 0,00 | – 340 453,82 |
| TOTAL PL | PLN | –1 329 135,32 | –8 151,74 | –1 320 983,58 |
| TOTAL PL | EUR | – 340 453,82 | 0,00 | – 340 453,82 |
| RO | Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines | 2011 | late payments | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –82 812,73 | –82 812,73 | 0,00 |
| TOTAL RO | EUR | –82 812,73 | –82 812,73 | 0,00 |
| SE | Financial audit - Overshooting | 2011 | exceeding of ceiling | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –3 013,42 | –3 013,42 | 0,00 |
| TOTAL SE | EUR | –3 013,42 | –3 013,42 | 0,00 |
| SI | Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats | 2007 | Failure to achieve the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks for ovine throughout the retention period and higher level of reductions and exclusions established during on-the-spot checks in the random sample than in the risk analysis sample | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –37 036,67 | 0,00 | –37 036,67 |
| SI | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines | 2008 | Non application of eligibility sanctions in case of late tagging of calves | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –61 130,59 | 0,00 | –61 130,59 |
| SI | Entitlements | 2008 | Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –25 453,98 | 0,00 | –25 453,98 |
| SI | Entitlements | 2009 | Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –13 990,92 | 0,00 | –13 990,92 |
| SI | Entitlements | 2010 | Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 148 484,50 | 0,00 | – 148 484,50 |
| TOTAL SI | EUR | – 286 096,66 | 0,00 | – 286 096,66 |
| SK | Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines | 2011 | late payments | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 346 334,22 | – 346 334,22 | 0,00 |
| SK | Cross Compliance | 2007 | GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 398 260,86 | 0,00 | – 398 260,86 |
| SK | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –23,84 | 0,00 | –23,84 |
| SK | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 779 668,89 | 0,00 | – 779 668,89 |
| SK | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –8,91 | 0,00 | –8,91 |
| SK | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 796,00 | 0,00 | – 796,00 |
| TOTAL SK | EUR | –1 525 092,72 | – 346 334,22 | –1 178 758,50 |
| 6701 TOTAL | DKK | – 142 645,00 | 0,00 | – 142 645,00 |
| 6701 TOTAL | GBP | –1 452 109,17 | 0,00 | –1 452 109,17 |
| 6701 TOTAL | HUF | – 281 162 836,10 | –5 622 679,91 | – 275 540 156,19 |
| 6701 TOTAL | PLN | –1 329 135,32 | –8 151,74 | –1 320 983,58 |
| 6701 TOTAL | EUR | – 296 785 796,48 | –18 661 087,63 | – 278 124 708,85 |
| |
| BUDGET ITEM: 6711 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –31 470,12 | 0,00 | –31 470,12 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 440,26 | 0,00 | –1 440,26 |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2010 | GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 352,15 | 0,00 | – 352,15 |
| TOTAL BE | EUR | –33 262,53 | 0,00 | –33 262,53 |
| BG | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | deficiencies in timinig of the on-the-spot checks and sample selection | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –40 146,27 | 0,00 | –40 146,27 |
| BG | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2010 | deficiencies in timinig of the on-the-spot checks and sample selection | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | 17 174,46 | 0,00 | 17 174,46 |
| TOTAL BG | EUR | –22 971,81 | 0,00 | –22 971,81 |
| CY | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2010 | Late administrative checks and inappropriate timing of on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –2 062,12 | 0,00 | –2 062,12 |
| CY | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2011 | Late administrative checks and inappropriate timing of on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –97 678,93 | 0,00 | –97 678,93 |
| TOTAL CY | EUR | –99 741,05 | 0,00 | –99 741,05 |
| CZ | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2008 | Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –2 153 061,12 | –10 764,12 | –2 142 297,00 |
| CZ | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –2 321 491,75 | –11 607,46 | –2 309 884,29 |
| CZ | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2010 | Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –2 418,58 | 0,00 | –2 418,58 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 621 456,24 | 0,00 | – 621 456,24 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –9,15 | 0,00 | –9,15 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –10 682,73 | 0,00 | –10 682,73 |
| CZ | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 669 467,88 | 0,00 | – 669 467,88 |
| TOTAL CZ | EUR | –5 778 587,45 | –22 371,58 | –5 756 215,87 |
| DE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2007 | weaknesses in selection among eligible applications | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 130 781,57 | 0,00 | – 130 781,57 |
| DE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2007 | Payments including ineligible VAT | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –2 698 127,96 | 0,00 | –2 698 127,96 |
| DE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2008 | weaknesses in selection among eligible applications | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 105 424,95 | 0,00 | – 105 424,95 |
| DE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2009 | weaknesses in selection among eligible applications | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | – 804 414,05 | 0,00 | – 804 414,05 |
| TOTAL DE | EUR | –3 738 748,53 | 0,00 | –3 738 748,53 |
| ES | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2009) | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –90 572,51 | 0,00 | –90 572,51 |
| ES | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2010) | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 126 456,16 | 0,00 | – 126 456,16 |
| ES | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2010 paid in financial year 2010) | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 125 866,86 | 0,00 | – 125 866,86 |
| ES | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2011) | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | 536,22 | 0,00 | 536,22 |
| ES | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2010 paid in financial year 2011) | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –36 730,38 | 0,00 | –36 730,38 |
| TOTAL ES | EUR | – 379 089,69 | 0,00 | – 379 089,69 |
| FI | Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance | 2009 | errors detected during the certification exercise for financial year 2009 in EAFRD population | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –1 766,40 | 0,00 | –1 766,40 |
| TOTAL FI | EUR | –1 766,40 | 0,00 | –1 766,40 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013) | 2007 | Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –2 678 837,27 | 0,00 | –2 678 837,27 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2008 | Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 015 793,65 | 0,00 | –1 015 793,65 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2008 | Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 386 514,48 | 0,00 | –1 386 514,48 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2009 | Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 125 462,91 | 0,00 | – 125 462,91 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2009 | Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 246 558,73 | 0,00 | –1 246 558,73 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2008 | deficiencies in the on the spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –21 056 869,75 | 0,00 | –21 056 869,75 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | deficiencies in the on the spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –7 898 813,60 | 0,00 | –7 898 813,60 |
| TOTAL FR | EUR | –35 408 850,39 | 0,00 | –35 408 850,39 |
| GB | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2008 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 355 672,24 | –16 180,58 | – 339 491,66 |
| GB | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 288 122,53 | 0,00 | – 288 122,53 |
| GB | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2010 | weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 298 761,99 | – 293 852,81 | –4 909,18 |
| GB | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, on-the-spot checks and payments and sanctions | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 173 720,59 | 0,00 | –1 173 720,59 |
| GB | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2008 | deficiencies in the Agri-environment measures | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –3 235 955,12 | –17 650,45 | –3 218 304,67 |
| GB | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | deficiencies in the Agri-environment measures | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –1 117 396,52 | –4 828,16 | –1 112 568,36 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –5 741,43 | 0,00 | –5 741,43 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –77 419,70 | 0,00 | –77 419,70 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –22 884,24 | 0,00 | –22 884,24 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 32,09 | 0,00 | 32,09 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –31,12 | 0,00 | –31,12 |
| GB | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –70,69 | 0,00 | –70,69 |
| TOTAL GB | EUR | –6 575 744,08 | – 332 512,00 | –6 243 232,08 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2008 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –79 998,57 | 0,00 | –79 998,57 |
| HU | Cross Compliance | 2009 | 8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 10,00  % | EUR | –21 025,02 | 0,00 | –21 025,02 |
| TOTAL HU | EUR | – 101 023,59 | 0,00 | – 101 023,59 |
| IE | Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance | 2010 | Known Error | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 197 620,52 | 0,00 | – 197 620,52 |
| IE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2007 | weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –10 122,22 | 0,00 | –10 122,22 |
| IE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2008 | weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112) | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 115 125,00 | 0,00 | – 115 125,00 |
| IE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2008 | weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –31 262,80 | 0,00 | –31 262,80 |
| IE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2009 | weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112) | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 134 055,00 | 0,00 | – 134 055,00 |
| IE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2009 | weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –20 795,07 | 0,00 | –20 795,07 |
| IE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2010 | weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112) | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –55 436,25 | 0,00 | –55 436,25 |
| IE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2010 | weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –19 051,20 | 0,00 | –19 051,20 |
| IE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2011 | weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –11 113,21 | 0,00 | –11 113,21 |
| TOTAL IE | EUR | – 594 581,27 | 0,00 | – 594 581,27 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2008 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | –2 885 304,84 | 0,00 | –2 885 304,84 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2009 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | –2 709 857,58 | 0,00 | –2 709 857,58 |
| IT | Accreditation Paying Agency | 2009 | deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD (debtors) | FLAT RATE | 16,00  % | EUR | –4 279,19 | 0,00 | –4 279,19 |
| IT | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2008 | delayed on-the-spot checks; insufficient checks of the use of fertilisers | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –7 886,00 | 0,00 | –7 886,00 |
| IT | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2008 | no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 246 930,00 | 0,00 | – 246 930,00 |
| TOTAL IT | EUR | –5 854 257,61 | 0,00 | –5 854 257,61 |
| LT | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2008 | Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –14 686,92 | 0,00 | –14 686,92 |
| LT | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2009 | Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 848 148,40 | 0,00 | – 848 148,40 |
| LT | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2010 | Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 766 818,02 | 0,00 | – 766 818,02 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2008 | One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –98 669,98 | 0,00 | –98 669,98 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –1 743,38 | 0,00 | –1 743,38 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 101 975,29 | 0,00 | – 101 975,29 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | 392,93 | 0,00 | 392,93 |
| LT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 382,94 | 0,00 | – 382,94 |
| TOTAL LT | EUR | –1 832 032,00 | 0,00 | –1 832 032,00 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –6 858,55 | 0,00 | –6 858,55 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –8 803,69 | 0,00 | –8 803,69 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –33,58 | 0,00 | –33,58 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 232,55 | 0,00 | – 232,55 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –2 078,01 | 0,00 | –2 078,01 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –12 545,31 | 0,00 | –12 545,31 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 239,50 | 0,00 | – 239,50 |
| MT | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –53,44 | 0,00 | –53,44 |
| TOTAL MT | EUR | –30 844,63 | 0,00 | –30 844,63 |
| PL | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2008 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 253 108,80 | 0,00 | – 253 108,80 |
| PL | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2008 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –9 868 306,45 | 0,00 | –9 868 306,45 |
| PL | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2009 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 627 971,30 | 0,00 | – 627 971,30 |
| PL | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2009 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –9 761 030,13 | 0,00 | –9 761 030,13 |
| PL | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2010 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | – 498 848,26 | 0,00 | – 498 848,26 |
| PL | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2010 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –7 753 973,66 | 0,00 | –7 753 973,66 |
| TOTAL PL | EUR | –28 763 238,60 | 0,00 | –28 763 238,60 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2009 | weaknesses in the controls of a risk of creation of artificial conditions, eligibility of the beneficiary, eligibility of expenses | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –3 579 714,82 | 0,00 | –3 579 714,82 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2010 | weaknesses in the controls of a risk of creation of artificial conditions, eligibility of the beneficiary, eligibility of expenses | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –8 921 103,16 | 0,00 | –8 921 103,16 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | Incomplete checks on parcels and on logbooks | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –2 239 090,38 | –2 239 090,38 | 0,00 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2010 | Incomplete checks on parcels and on logbooks | FLAT RATE | 2,00  % | EUR | –2 959 592,24 | 0,00 | –2 959 592,24 |
| TOTAL RO | EUR | –17 699 500,60 | –2 239 090,38 | –15 460 410,22 |
| SK | Cross Compliance | 2008 | GAEC not defined, on-the-spot checks weaknesses - claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 378 504,46 | 0,00 | – 378 504,46 |
| SK | Cross Compliance | 2009 | GAEC not defined, on-the-spot checks weaknesses - claim year 2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 787,35 | 0,00 | – 787,35 |
| TOTAL SK | EUR | – 379 291,81 | 0,00 | – 379 291,81 |
| 6711 TOTAL | EUR | – 107 293 532,04 | –2 593 973,96 | – 104 699 558,08 |
| |
| BUDGET ITEM: 6500 |
| LT | Rural Development - Transitional Instrument | 2007 | Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 428 809,33 | 0,00 | – 428 809,33 |
| LT | Rural Development - Transitional Instrument | 2008 | Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | – 974 546,18 | 0,00 | – 974 546,18 |
| TOTAL LT | EUR | –1 403 355,51 | 0,00 | –1 403 355,51 |
| PL | Rural Development - Transitional Instrument | 2007 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –4 422 645,43 | 0,00 | –4 422 645,43 |
| PL | Rural Development - Transitional Instrument | 2008 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | –1 271 573,68 | 0,00 | –1 271 573,68 |
| PL | Rural Development - Transitional Instrument | 2009 | Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme | FLAT RATE | 5,00  % | EUR | 5 778,15 | 0,00 | 5 778,15 |
| TOTAL PL | EUR | –5 688 440,96 | 0,00 | –5 688 440,96 |
| 6500 TOTAL | EUR | –7 091 796,47 | 0,00 | –7 091 796,47 |

Member State

Measure

Financial Year

Reason

Type

%

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial impact

BUDGET ITEM: 6701

BE

Cross Compliance

2006

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–93 217,10

0,00

–93 217,10

BE

Cross Compliance

2007

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

152,33

0,00

152,33

BE

Cross Compliance

2007

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 869 463,15

0,00

– 869 463,15

BE

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

4,89

0,00

4,89

BE

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

252,09

0,00

252,09

BE

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 481 485,19

0,00

–1 481 485,19

BE

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, Claim 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

28,08

0,00

28,08

BE

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

19,78

0,00

19,78

BE

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

49,34

0,00

49,34

BE

Cross Compliance

2010

GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–70,55

0,00

–70,55

TOTAL BE

EUR

–2 443 729,48

0,00

–2 443 729,48

CY

Financial audit - Overshooting

2011

exceeding of ceilings

ONE-OFF

EUR

–26,69

–26,69

0,00

TOTAL CY

EUR

–26,69

–26,69

0,00

CZ

Cross Compliance

2007

GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 985 525,73

0,00

– 985 525,73

CZ

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 355,61

0,00

– 355,61

CZ

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 901 569,16

0,00

–1 901 569,16

CZ

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–19,89

0,00

–19,89

CZ

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 546,95

0,00

–1 546,95

CZ

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–2 366 879,57

0,00

–2 366 879,57

TOTAL CZ

EUR

–5 255 896,91

0,00

–5 255 896,91

DK

Irregularities

2011

deficiencies in the recovery of a debt case

ONE-OFF

DKK

– 142 645,00

0,00

– 142 645,00

TOTAL DK

DKK

– 142 645,00

0,00

– 142 645,00

ES

Entitlements

2007

forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 969 526,34

0,00

–1 969 526,34

ES

Entitlements

2007

deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 435 445,92

0,00

–1 435 445,92

ES

Entitlements

2007

deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 718 490,48

0,00

– 718 490,48

ES

Entitlements

2007

wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 107 390,07

0,00

– 107 390,07

ES

Entitlements

2008

forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–2 140 711,78

0,00

–2 140 711,78

ES

Entitlements

2008

deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 441 201,28

0,00

–1 441 201,28

ES

Entitlements

2008

deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 721 414,45

0,00

– 721 414,45

ES

Entitlements

2008

wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 136 846,50

0,00

– 136 846,50

ES

Entitlements

2009

deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 453 007,15

0,00

–1 453 007,15

ES

Entitlements

2009

forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–5 060 486,51

0,00

–5 060 486,51

ES

Entitlements

2009

deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 687 715,79

0,00

– 687 715,79

ES

Entitlements

2009

wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 157 667,86

0,00

– 157 667,86

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2002

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

25,00  %

EUR

– 451 439,06

0,00

– 451 439,06

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2002

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

ONE-OFF

EUR

–8 255 792,17

0,00

–8 255 792,17

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2003

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 625 835,59

0,00

– 625 835,59

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2003

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 283 466,31

0,00

– 283 466,31

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2003

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

25,00  %

EUR

– 637 325,71

0,00

– 637 325,71

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2003

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

ONE-OFF

EUR

–10 428 368,99

0,00

–10 428 368,99

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2004

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 543 032,76

0,00

– 543 032,76

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2004

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 612 356,11

0,00

– 612 356,11

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2004

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–85 673,90

0,00

–85 673,90

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2004

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 420 186,53

0,00

– 420 186,53

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2004

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

25,00  %

EUR

– 637 325,72

0,00

– 637 325,72

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2004

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

ONE-OFF

EUR

–10 428 369,25

0,00

–10 428 369,25

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2005

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 644 593,50

0,00

– 644 593,50

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2005

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–1 197 102,19

0,00

–1 197 102,19

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2005

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–29 829,44

0,00

–29 829,44

ES

Export refunds - other

2005

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–3 070,58

0,00

–3 070,58

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2005

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–73 612,22

0,00

–73 612,22

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2005

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

25,00  %

EUR

–79 665,71

0,00

–79 665,71

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2005

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

ONE-OFF

EUR

–1 303 546,06

0,00

–1 303 546,06

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2006

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 114 829,31

0,00

– 114 829,31

ES

Export refunds - Live animals

2006

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–12 087,30

0,00

–12 087,30

ES

Export refunds - other

2006

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 368 662,52

0,00

– 368 662,52

ES

Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose

2006

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–1 568 548,49

0,00

–1 568 548,49

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2006

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–1 792,30

0,00

–1 792,30

ES

Export refunds - other

2006

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–1 792,30

0,00

–1 792,30

ES

Export refunds - other

2006

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 108 785,66

0,00

– 108 785,66

ES

Export refunds - other

2007

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 233 717,84

0,00

– 233 717,84

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2007

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–9 738,24

0,00

–9 738,24

ES

Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose

2007

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 883 426,04

0,00

– 883 426,04

ES

Export refunds - other

2007

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 762,46

0,00

– 762,46

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2007

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 676,14

0,00

– 676,14

ES

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2008

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–47 777,24

0,00

–47 777,24

ES

Export refunds - other

2008

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 191 108,96

0,00

– 191 108,96

ES

Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose

2008

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 310 869,70

0,00

– 310 869,70

ES

Export refunds - other

2008

deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–1 043,65

0,00

–1 043,65

ES

Irregularities

2007

reimbursment due to rectification of the Annex III table for financial year 2006

ONE-OFF

EUR

1 998 905,54

0,00

1 998 905,54

ES

Irregularities

2011

weakness in the recovery procedure of a debt

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 214 008,50

0,00

– 214 008,50

ES

Cross Compliance

2006

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–2 049 444,68

– 470,83

–2 048 973,85

ES

Cross Compliance

2007

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–9 678,62

0,00

–9 678,62

ES

Cross Compliance

2007

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

41,87

0,00

41,87

ES

Cross Compliance

2007

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–4 385 343,30

– 387,58

–4 384 955,72

ES

Cross Compliance

2007

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

181,89

0,00

181,89

ES

Cross Compliance

2008

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–3 017,65

0,00

–3 017,65

ES

Cross Compliance

2008

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

0,84

0,00

0,84

ES

Cross Compliance

2008

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–35 502,66

–2,94

–35 499,72

ES

Cross Compliance

2008

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

50,65

0,00

50,65

ES

Cross Compliance

2009

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–2 196,12

0,00

–2 196,12

ES

Cross Compliance

2009

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

30,80

0,00

30,80

ES

Cross Compliance

2009

1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 229,56

0,00

–1 229,56

ES

Cross Compliance

2009

1 GAEC missing, Effectiveness of controls, Application of reduction, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

256,70

0,00

256,70

TOTAL ES

EUR

–61 327 066,88

– 861,35

–61 326 205,53

FI

Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance

2009

errors detected during the certification exercise for financial year 2009 in EAGF population

ONE-OFF

EUR

–64 880,77

0,00

–64 880,77

TOTAL FI

EUR

–64 880,77

0,00

–64 880,77

FR

Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines

2011

Late payments

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 138 405,90

– 138 405,90

0,00

FR

Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines

2011

Late payments

ONE-OFF

EUR

–1 233 451,34

–1 233 451,34

0,00

FR

Certification

2008

Ineligible expenditure

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 108 312,83

0,00

– 108 312,83

FR

Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats

2007

non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–1 552 358,26

–9 314,14

–1 543 044,12

FR

Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats

2008

non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–1 492 340,47

0,00

–1 492 340,47

FR

Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats

2009

non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–1 429 479,12

0,00

–1 429 479,12

FR

Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats

2010

non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 109,82

0,00

– 109,82

TOTAL FR

EUR

–5 954 457,74

–1 381 171,38

–4 573 286,36

GB

Decoupled Direct Aids

2008

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–27 569 252,08

–11 938 317,64

–15 630 934,44

GB

Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops

2008

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–99 998,30

0,00

–99 998,30

GB

Other Direct Aids

2008

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–88 938,90

0,00

–88 938,90

GB

Other Direct Aids

2009

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 107 725,59

0,00

– 107 725,59

GB

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–41 109 525,75

0,00

–41 109 525,75

GB

Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops

2009

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–31 594,40

0,00

–31 594,40

GB

Decoupled Direct Aids

2010

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–41 490 749,02

0,00

–41 490 749,02

GB

Other Direct Aids

2010

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 174 763,24

0,00

– 174 763,24

GB

Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops

2010

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–63 023,44

0,00

–63 023,44

GB

Decoupled Direct Aids

2010

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in the on-the-spot checks and payments and sanctions

EXTRAPOLATED

5,19  %

EUR

–16 513 582,57

–1 954 694,52

–14 558 888,05

GB

Irregularities

2011

Deficiencies in the recovery of a debt case

ONE-OFF

GBP

–1 452 109,17

0,00

–1 452 109,17

GB

Cross Compliance

2007

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–73 257,36

0,00

–73 257,36

GB

Cross Compliance

2008

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–4 064,43

0,00

–4 064,43

GB

Cross Compliance

2008

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 643 405,41

– 700,40

–1 642 705,01

GB

Cross Compliance

2009

Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 642 321,16

0,00

– 642 321,16

GB

Cross Compliance

2009

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 521,54

0,00

– 521,54

GB

Cross Compliance

2009

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–5 359,10

0,00

–5 359,10

GB

Cross Compliance

2010

Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 712,31

0,00

– 712,31

GB

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 536,91

0,00

– 536,91

TOTAL GB

GBP

–1 452 109,17

0,00

–1 452 109,17

TOTAL GB

EUR

– 129 619 331,51

–13 893 712,56

– 115 725 618,95

GR

Financial audit - Overshooting

2010

Exceeding of ceilings

ONE-OFF

EUR

–4 048 593,82

0,00

–4 048 593,82

GR

Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines

2010

late payments

ONE-OFF

EUR

–11 217,98

–11 217,98

0,00

GR

Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines

2010

late payments

ONE-OFF

EUR

–1 148 947,18

– 375 753,63

– 773 193,55

GR

Food Aid within the Community

2006

Overpaid public storage costs

ONE-OFF

EUR

–58 833,00

0,00

–58 833,00

GR

Public Storage - Rice

2006

Overpaid public storage costs

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 369 174,82

0,00

– 369 174,82

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines

2007

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 016 633,47

0,00

–1 016 633,47

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines

2007

change of the eligibility criteria after the end of the claim year 2006

ONE-OFF

EUR

–1 246 345,92

0,00

–1 246 345,92

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines

2007

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 358 518,51

0,00

– 358 518,51

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines

2008

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 125 128,34

0,00

– 125 128,34

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines

2008

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 567 077,51

0,00

– 567 077,51

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines

2008

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 339 319,37

0,00

– 339 319,37

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines

2008

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

12,58

0,00

12,58

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines

2009

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–23 367,16

0,00

–23 367,16

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines

2009

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–10 743,31

0,00

–10 743,31

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines

2009

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

1 998,07

0,00

1 998,07

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines

2009

control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 066,26

0,00

–1 066,26

TOTAL GR

EUR

–9 322 956,00

– 386 971,61

–8 935 984,39

HU

Cross Compliance

2006

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

HUF

– 281 162 836,10

–5 622 679,91

– 275 540 156,19

HU

Cross Compliance

2007

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–1 456,02

–1 403,78

–52,24

HU

Cross Compliance

2007

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–2 836 628,70

–21 435,09

–2 815 193,61

HU

Cross Compliance

2008

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

23,59

0,00

23,59

HU

Cross Compliance

2008

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

387,67

–32,60

420,27

HU

Cross Compliance

2008

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–5 428 019,24

–28 383,73

–5 399 635,51

HU

Cross Compliance

2009

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 101,51

0,00

– 101,51

HU

Cross Compliance

2009

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 416,76

0,00

– 416,76

HU

Cross Compliance

2009

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–8 066,23

0,00

–8 066,23

TOTAL HU

HUF

– 281 162 836,10

–5 622 679,91

– 275 540 156,19

TOTAL HU

EUR

–8 274 277,20

–51 255,20

–8 223 022,00

IE

Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines

2011

late payments

ONE-OFF

EUR

–13 215,75

–13 215,75

0,00

IE

Irregularities

2007

Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2006

ONE-OFF

EUR

–3 606,20

0,00

–3 606,20

IE

Irregularities

2008

Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2007

ONE-OFF

EUR

–1 048,99

0,00

–1 048,99

IE

Irregularities

2009

Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2008

ONE-OFF

EUR

–2 109,23

0,00

–2 109,23

IE

Irregularities

2010

Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2009

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 892,44

0,00

– 892,44

IE

Irregularities

2011

Negligence in recovering the debt

ONE-OFF

EUR

–22 624,22

0,00

–22 624,22

TOTAL IE

EUR

–43 496,83

–13 215,75

–30 281,08

IT

Cross Compliance

2006

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–2 140 320,86

– 521,76

–2 139 799,10

IT

Cross Compliance

2006

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–17,57

0,00

–17,57

IT

Cross Compliance

2006

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–3 799 568,80

– 877,18

–3 798 691,62

IT

Cross Compliance

2006

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2005

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 588,40

0,00

– 588,40

IT

Cross Compliance

2007

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–7 065 635,65

–60 023,03

–7 005 612,62

IT

Cross Compliance

2007

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–5 975,35

0,00

–5 975,35

IT

Cross Compliance

2007

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–8 809 763,62

–53 375,69

–8 756 387,93

IT

Cross Compliance

2007

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–19 257,41

0,00

–19 257,41

IT

Cross Compliance

2008

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–11 214 946,03

–43 992,23

–11 170 953,80

IT

Cross Compliance

2008

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 698 146,26

0,00

– 698 146,26

IT

Cross Compliance

2008

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–14 331 663,30

–48 186,16

–14 283 477,14

IT

Cross Compliance

2008

Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 216 402,75

–74,09

– 216 328,66

IT

Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines

2011

late payments

ONE-OFF

EUR

–2 458 104,43

–2 458 104,43

0,00

IT

Milk - Quota

2011

recovery of milk levy

ONE-OFF

EUR

163 991,21

163 991,21

0,00

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2007

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

–3 248,92

0,00

–3 248,92

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2007

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors)

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

–64 771,05

0,00

–64 771,05

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2008

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

–2 527,19

0,00

–2 527,19

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2008

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors)

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

– 119 653,30

0,00

– 119 653,30

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2009

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

– 445 807,98

0,00

– 445 807,98

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2009

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors)

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

– 118 662,34

0,00

– 118 662,34

IT

Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing

2005

Gravely deficient control system, fraud

FLAT RATE

25,00  %

EUR

–17 098 044,58

0,00

–17 098 044,58

IT

Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing

2006

Gravely deficient control system, fraud

FLAT RATE

25,00  %

EUR

– 817 132,98

0,00

– 817 132,98

IT

Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing

2007

Gravely deficient control system, fraud

FLAT RATE

25,00  %

EUR

1 201,24

0,00

1 201,24

IT

Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures

2006

no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 318 652,00

0,00

– 318 652,00

IT

Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures

2006

delayed on-the-spot checks; insufficient checks of the use of fertilisers

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–50 391,00

0,00

–50 391,00

IT

Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures

2006

no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 625 923,00

0,00

– 625 923,00

IT

Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures

2007

no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

4 073,00

0,00

4 073,00

TOTAL IT

EUR

–70 255 939,32

–2 501 163,36

–67 754 775,96

LT

Cross Compliance

2007

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

26,70

0,00

26,70

LT

Cross Compliance

2007

Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–28 566,80

– 545,96

–28 020,84

LT

Cross Compliance

2008

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 154 416,57

0,00

– 154 416,57

LT

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC not defined (1st pillar only), claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 404 835,64

0,00

– 404 835,64

LT

Cross Compliance

2008

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

0,83

0,00

0,83

LT

Cross Compliance

2008

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

1 014,70

0,00

1 014,70

LT

Cross Compliance

2008

Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 216,86

–3,40

– 213,46

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 200,95

0,00

– 200,95

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 204 161,54

0,00

– 204 161,54

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC not defined (1st pillar only), claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 468 159,50

0,00

– 468 159,50

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–0,01

0,00

–0,01

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

164,08

0,00

164,08

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

37,58

0,00

37,58

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–13,95

0,00

–13,95

LT

Cross Compliance

2010

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–24,21

0,00

–24,21

LT

Cross Compliance

2010

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 188,77

0,00

– 188,77

LT

Cross Compliance

2010

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

5,41

0,00

5,41

LT

Cross Compliance

2010

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

29,86

0,00

29,86

LT

Cross Compliance

2010

One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

29,88

0,00

29,88

TOTAL LT

EUR

–1 259 475,76

– 549,36

–1 258 926,40

MT

Cross Compliance

2008

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–7 853,65

0,00

–7 853,65

MT

Cross Compliance

2009

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–20,61

0,00

–20,61

MT

Cross Compliance

2009

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–13 568,05

0,00

–13 568,05

MT

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–2,90

0,00

–2,90

MT

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–88,08

0,00

–88,08

MT

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–16 838,20

0,00

–16 838,20

MT

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

142,32

0,00

142,32

MT

Cross Compliance

2011

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–26,86

0,00

–26,86

MT

Cross Compliance

2011

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–26,01

0,00

–26,01

TOTAL MT

EUR

–38 282,04

0,00

–38 282,04

NL

Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance

2010

known error related to the use of bumble bees for pollination

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 688 510,00

0,00

– 688 510,00

TOTAL NL

EUR

– 688 510,00

0,00

– 688 510,00

PL

Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing

2007

weaknesses in the controls checks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

PLN

–1 166 100,45

–8 151,74

–1 157 948,71

PL

Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing

2007

late payments

ONE-OFF

PLN

– 163 034,87

0,00

– 163 034,87

PL

Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing

2008

weaknesses in the controls checks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 340 453,82

0,00

– 340 453,82

TOTAL PL

PLN

–1 329 135,32

–8 151,74

–1 320 983,58

TOTAL PL

EUR

– 340 453,82

0,00

– 340 453,82

RO

Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines

2011

late payments

ONE-OFF

EUR

–82 812,73

–82 812,73

0,00

TOTAL RO

EUR

–82 812,73

–82 812,73

0,00

SE

Financial audit - Overshooting

2011

exceeding of ceiling

ONE-OFF

EUR

–3 013,42

–3 013,42

0,00

TOTAL SE

EUR

–3 013,42

–3 013,42

0,00

SI

Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats

2007

Failure to achieve the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks for ovine throughout the retention period and higher level of reductions and exclusions established during on-the-spot checks in the random sample than in the risk analysis sample

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–37 036,67

0,00

–37 036,67

SI

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines

2008

Non application of eligibility sanctions in case of late tagging of calves

ONE-OFF

EUR

–61 130,59

0,00

–61 130,59

SI

Entitlements

2008

Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases

ONE-OFF

EUR

–25 453,98

0,00

–25 453,98

SI

Entitlements

2009

Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases

ONE-OFF

EUR

–13 990,92

0,00

–13 990,92

SI

Entitlements

2010

Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 148 484,50

0,00

– 148 484,50

TOTAL SI

EUR

– 286 096,66

0,00

– 286 096,66

SK

Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines

2011

late payments

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 346 334,22

– 346 334,22

0,00

SK

Cross Compliance

2007

GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 398 260,86

0,00

– 398 260,86

SK

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–23,84

0,00

–23,84

SK

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 779 668,89

0,00

– 779 668,89

SK

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–8,91

0,00

–8,91

SK

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 796,00

0,00

– 796,00

TOTAL SK

EUR

–1 525 092,72

– 346 334,22

–1 178 758,50

6701 TOTAL

DKK

– 142 645,00

0,00

– 142 645,00

6701 TOTAL

GBP

–1 452 109,17

0,00

–1 452 109,17

6701 TOTAL

HUF

– 281 162 836,10

–5 622 679,91

– 275 540 156,19

6701 TOTAL

PLN

–1 329 135,32

–8 151,74

–1 320 983,58

6701 TOTAL

EUR

– 296 785 796,48

–18 661 087,63

– 278 124 708,85

BUDGET ITEM: 6711

BE

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–31 470,12

0,00

–31 470,12

BE

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 440,26

0,00

–1 440,26

BE

Cross Compliance

2010

GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 352,15

0,00

– 352,15

TOTAL BE

EUR

–33 262,53

0,00

–33 262,53

BG

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

deficiencies in timinig of the on-the-spot checks and sample selection

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–40 146,27

0,00

–40 146,27

BG

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2010

deficiencies in timinig of the on-the-spot checks and sample selection

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

17 174,46

0,00

17 174,46

TOTAL BG

EUR

–22 971,81

0,00

–22 971,81

CY

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2010

Late administrative checks and inappropriate timing of on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–2 062,12

0,00

–2 062,12

CY

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2011

Late administrative checks and inappropriate timing of on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–97 678,93

0,00

–97 678,93

TOTAL CY

EUR

–99 741,05

0,00

–99 741,05

CZ

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2008

Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–2 153 061,12

–10 764,12

–2 142 297,00

CZ

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–2 321 491,75

–11 607,46

–2 309 884,29

CZ

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2010

Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–2 418,58

0,00

–2 418,58

CZ

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 621 456,24

0,00

– 621 456,24

CZ

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–9,15

0,00

–9,15

CZ

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–10 682,73

0,00

–10 682,73

CZ

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 669 467,88

0,00

– 669 467,88

TOTAL CZ

EUR

–5 778 587,45

–22 371,58

–5 756 215,87

DE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2007

weaknesses in selection among eligible applications

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 130 781,57

0,00

– 130 781,57

DE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2007

Payments including ineligible VAT

ONE-OFF

EUR

–2 698 127,96

0,00

–2 698 127,96

DE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2008

weaknesses in selection among eligible applications

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 105 424,95

0,00

– 105 424,95

DE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2009

weaknesses in selection among eligible applications

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

– 804 414,05

0,00

– 804 414,05

TOTAL DE

EUR

–3 738 748,53

0,00

–3 738 748,53

ES

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2009)

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–90 572,51

0,00

–90 572,51

ES

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2010

Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2010)

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 126 456,16

0,00

– 126 456,16

ES

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2010

Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2010 paid in financial year 2010)

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 125 866,86

0,00

– 125 866,86

ES

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2011

Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2011)

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

536,22

0,00

536,22

ES

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2011

Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2010 paid in financial year 2011)

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–36 730,38

0,00

–36 730,38

TOTAL ES

EUR

– 379 089,69

0,00

– 379 089,69

FI

Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance

2009

errors detected during the certification exercise for financial year 2009 in EAFRD population

ONE-OFF

EUR

–1 766,40

0,00

–1 766,40

TOTAL FI

EUR

–1 766,40

0,00

–1 766,40

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013)

2007

Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–2 678 837,27

0,00

–2 678 837,27

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2008

Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 015 793,65

0,00

–1 015 793,65

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2008

Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 386 514,48

0,00

–1 386 514,48

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2009

Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 125 462,91

0,00

– 125 462,91

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2009

Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 246 558,73

0,00

–1 246 558,73

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2008

deficiencies in the on the spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–21 056 869,75

0,00

–21 056 869,75

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

deficiencies in the on the spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–7 898 813,60

0,00

–7 898 813,60

TOTAL FR

EUR

–35 408 850,39

0,00

–35 408 850,39

GB

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2008

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 355 672,24

–16 180,58

– 339 491,66

GB

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 288 122,53

0,00

– 288 122,53

GB

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2010

weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 298 761,99

– 293 852,81

–4 909,18

GB

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2010

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, on-the-spot checks and payments and sanctions

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 173 720,59

0,00

–1 173 720,59

GB

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2008

deficiencies in the Agri-environment measures

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–3 235 955,12

–17 650,45

–3 218 304,67

GB

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

deficiencies in the Agri-environment measures

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–1 117 396,52

–4 828,16

–1 112 568,36

GB

Cross Compliance

2008

Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–5 741,43

0,00

–5 741,43

GB

Cross Compliance

2008

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–77 419,70

0,00

–77 419,70

GB

Cross Compliance

2009

Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–22 884,24

0,00

–22 884,24

GB

Cross Compliance

2009

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

32,09

0,00

32,09

GB

Cross Compliance

2010

Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–31,12

0,00

–31,12

GB

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–70,69

0,00

–70,69

TOTAL GB

EUR

–6 575 744,08

– 332 512,00

–6 243 232,08

HU

Cross Compliance

2008

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–79 998,57

0,00

–79 998,57

HU

Cross Compliance

2009

8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

10,00  %

EUR

–21 025,02

0,00

–21 025,02

TOTAL HU

EUR

– 101 023,59

0,00

– 101 023,59

IE

Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance

2010

Known Error

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 197 620,52

0,00

– 197 620,52

IE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2007

weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)

ONE-OFF

EUR

–10 122,22

0,00

–10 122,22

IE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2008

weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112)

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 115 125,00

0,00

– 115 125,00

IE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2008

weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)

ONE-OFF

EUR

–31 262,80

0,00

–31 262,80

IE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2009

weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112)

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 134 055,00

0,00

– 134 055,00

IE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2009

weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)

ONE-OFF

EUR

–20 795,07

0,00

–20 795,07

IE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2010

weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112)

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–55 436,25

0,00

–55 436,25

IE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2010

weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)

ONE-OFF

EUR

–19 051,20

0,00

–19 051,20

IE

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2011

weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)

ONE-OFF

EUR

–11 113,21

0,00

–11 113,21

TOTAL IE

EUR

– 594 581,27

0,00

– 594 581,27

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2008

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

–2 885 304,84

0,00

–2 885 304,84

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2009

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

–2 709 857,58

0,00

–2 709 857,58

IT

Accreditation Paying Agency

2009

deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD (debtors)

FLAT RATE

16,00  %

EUR

–4 279,19

0,00

–4 279,19

IT

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2008

delayed on-the-spot checks; insufficient checks of the use of fertilisers

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–7 886,00

0,00

–7 886,00

IT

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2008

no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 246 930,00

0,00

– 246 930,00

TOTAL IT

EUR

–5 854 257,61

0,00

–5 854 257,61

LT

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2008

Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–14 686,92

0,00

–14 686,92

LT

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2009

Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 848 148,40

0,00

– 848 148,40

LT

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2010

Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 766 818,02

0,00

– 766 818,02

LT

Cross Compliance

2008

One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–98 669,98

0,00

–98 669,98

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–1 743,38

0,00

–1 743,38

LT

Cross Compliance

2009

One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 101 975,29

0,00

– 101 975,29

LT

Cross Compliance

2010

One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

392,93

0,00

392,93

LT

Cross Compliance

2010

One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 382,94

0,00

– 382,94

TOTAL LT

EUR

–1 832 032,00

0,00

–1 832 032,00

MT

Cross Compliance

2009

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–6 858,55

0,00

–6 858,55

MT

Cross Compliance

2009

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–8 803,69

0,00

–8 803,69

MT

Cross Compliance

2009

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–33,58

0,00

–33,58

MT

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 232,55

0,00

– 232,55

MT

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–2 078,01

0,00

–2 078,01

MT

Cross Compliance

2010

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–12 545,31

0,00

–12 545,31

MT

Cross Compliance

2011

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 239,50

0,00

– 239,50

MT

Cross Compliance

2011

Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–53,44

0,00

–53,44

TOTAL MT

EUR

–30 844,63

0,00

–30 844,63

PL

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2008

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 253 108,80

0,00

– 253 108,80

PL

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2008

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–9 868 306,45

0,00

–9 868 306,45

PL

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2009

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 627 971,30

0,00

– 627 971,30

PL

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2009

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–9 761 030,13

0,00

–9 761 030,13

PL

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2010

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

– 498 848,26

0,00

– 498 848,26

PL

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2010

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–7 753 973,66

0,00

–7 753 973,66

TOTAL PL

EUR

–28 763 238,60

0,00

–28 763 238,60

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2009

weaknesses in the controls of a risk of creation of artificial conditions, eligibility of the beneficiary, eligibility of expenses

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–3 579 714,82

0,00

–3 579 714,82

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2010

weaknesses in the controls of a risk of creation of artificial conditions, eligibility of the beneficiary, eligibility of expenses

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–8 921 103,16

0,00

–8 921 103,16

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

Incomplete checks on parcels and on logbooks

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–2 239 090,38

–2 239 090,38

0,00

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2010

Incomplete checks on parcels and on logbooks

FLAT RATE

2,00  %

EUR

–2 959 592,24

0,00

–2 959 592,24

TOTAL RO

EUR

–17 699 500,60

–2 239 090,38

–15 460 410,22

SK

Cross Compliance

2008

GAEC not defined, on-the-spot checks weaknesses - claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 378 504,46

0,00

– 378 504,46

SK

Cross Compliance

2009

GAEC not defined, on-the-spot checks weaknesses - claim year 2007

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 787,35

0,00

– 787,35

TOTAL SK

EUR

– 379 291,81

0,00

– 379 291,81

6711 TOTAL

EUR

– 107 293 532,04

–2 593 973,96

– 104 699 558,08

BUDGET ITEM: 6500

LT

Rural Development - Transitional Instrument

2007

Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 428 809,33

0,00

– 428 809,33

LT

Rural Development - Transitional Instrument

2008

Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

– 974 546,18

0,00

– 974 546,18

TOTAL LT

EUR

–1 403 355,51

0,00

–1 403 355,51

PL

Rural Development - Transitional Instrument

2007

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–4 422 645,43

0,00

–4 422 645,43

PL

Rural Development - Transitional Instrument

2008

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

–1 271 573,68

0,00

–1 271 573,68

PL

Rural Development - Transitional Instrument

2009

Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme

FLAT RATE

5,00  %

EUR

5 778,15

0,00

5 778,15

TOTAL PL

EUR

–5 688 440,96

0,00

–5 688 440,96

6500 TOTAL

EUR

–7 091 796,47

0,00

–7 091 796,47

---