alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10883]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Settlement Agreement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 23, 2001, a proposed 
Settlement Agreement in In Re: Teplitz Auto Parts, Inc., No. 00-13384 
(ash) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.), a bankruptcy action involving Teplitz Auto 
Parts, Inc., a defendant in United States v. Woodward Metal Processing, 
Corp. et al., No. 98-2736 (JWB/GDH) (D.N.J.), was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. By its 
terms, the Settlement Agreement becomes effective only after approval 
is obtained from both the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court.
    In the District Court action, the United States sought to recover 
response costs incurred in connection with a removal action at the 
Woodward Metal Processing Corporation Site, located at 125 Woodward 
Street, Jersey City, New Jersey (``Site''), pursuant to Section 107 of 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 
Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9607. The proposed Settlement Agreement 
would allow a general unsecured claim in the bankruptcy action by the 
United States in the amount of $375,000. Together with other ending 
settlements, the Settlement Agreement would resolve the District Court 
action in its entirety.
    The U.S. Department of Justice will receive, for period of thirty 
(30) days from the date of publication of this Notice, comments 
relating to the proposed Settlement Agreement. Any comments should be 
addressed to the Assistant Attorney General for the Environmental and 
Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should reference the following case name 
and number: United States v. Metal Processing Corp., et al., DJ #90-11-
2-1299/1.
    The proposed Settlement Agreement may be examined at the offices of 
EPA Region II, located at 290 Broadway, New York, New York, c/o 
Virginia Curry, Esq., (212) 637-3134, or at the U.S. Attorney's Office, 
970 Broad St., 7th Floor, Newark, NJ 07102, c/o Susan Cassell, Esq., 
(973) 645-2700. A copy of the proposed Settlement Agreement may also be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, c/o Peggy Fenlon-
Gore, (202) 514-5245. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in 
the amount of $6.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to 
the Consent Decree Library.

Ronald G. Gluck, Esq.,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-10883 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Electric Vehicle Charging Safety Tips 

Are you thinking of buying an electric vehicle (EV)? Here are steps you can take to lower 

your risk of fire and electric shock injury related to charging EVs.

Before buying an EV, have a qualified 

electrician install: 

ĵ A new, dedicated circuit for your EV 

charging device. Older home wiring may 

not be suitable for use with EV supply 

equipment. 

ĵ Level II charging devices (if that is your 

preferred charging method).

Charging EVs: 

ĵ Follow manufacturer’s guidelines when charging your vehicle. Check 

with your local dealer if you need additional information.

ĵ Purchase a charging device that is certified by a nationally recognized 

testing laboratory.

ĵ Plug Level I EV chargers directly into an outlet designed to handle the 

amperage of the charging device. Never use a multiplug adapter or 

extension cord. 

ĵ Install a residual current device with the charging unit. It will turn off 

the power if a fault is detected and help prevent a fire. 

ĵ Place all charging device components out of reach of children when not 

in use. 

ĵ Maintain the components of your charging station according to the 

manufacturer’s maintenance guidelines. Signs of excessive wear may 

indicate a potential shock hazard. Never use an EV charger with obvious 

signs of damage.

ĵ Cover the EV charging station outlet to stop water from entering. Check 

the manufacturer’s guidelines to make sure it is safe to charge your EV 

in wet conditions. 

Charging an EV is safe when done with certified equipment. By following these tips, you can lower your risk of having an associated 

fire or an electric shock injury.

Scan to 

learn more!

For more information and free resources, visit: usfa.fema.gov.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 701 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 701

 To prohibit the use of funds to transfer enemy combatants detained by 
   the United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to any 
   facility in Oklahoma, or to construct any facility for such enemy 
                        combatants in Oklahoma.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2009

   Ms. Fallin (for herself, Mr. Cole, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Boren, and Mr. 
  Sullivan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of funds to transfer enemy combatants detained by 
   the United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to any 
   facility in Oklahoma, or to construct any facility for such enemy 
                        combatants in Oklahoma.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER INDIVIDUALS DETAINED 
              AT GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO ANY FACILITY IN OKLAHOMA, OR 
              TO CONSTRUCT ANY FACILITY FOR SUCH INDIVIDUALS IN 
              OKLAHOMA.

    None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to any 
Federal department or agency may be used--
            (1) to transfer any enemy combatant detained by the United 
        States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to any facility 
        in Oklahoma; or
            (2) to build, modify, or enhance any facility in Oklahoma 
        for the purpose of housing any such enemy combatant.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the "Report), I, Jack Blair, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as
added by ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the period covered by the Report.



                              /s/ Jack Blair
                             -----------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                  Jack L. Blair
                                  March 12, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41630 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-529-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Hernandez-Hernandez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States, without permission, following deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b). Although Hernandez-Hernandez signed a waiver provision as part of his plea agreement, we need not determine the effect of that waiver because Hernandez-Hernandez cannot prevail on the merits of his appellate arguments.No. 04-41630 -2- For the first time on appeal, Hernandez-Hernandez argues that the sentencing provisions in § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. Hernandez-Hernandez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Hernandez-Hernandez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.
See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Hernandez-Hernandez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Also for the first time on appeal, Hernandez-Hernandez argues that the district court erred when it sentenced him pursuant to the mandatory United States Sentencing Guidelines held unconstitutional in United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Application of the Sentencing Guidelines in their mandatory form constitutes error that is plain. United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 267 (2005). However, nothing in the record indicates that the district court would have imposed a different sentence if it had known that it was not bound by the sentencing guidelines. Accordingly, district court’s error did not affectNo. 04-41630 -3- Hernandez-Hernandez’s substantial rights. See id. at 733-34. Hernandez-Hernandez has not established reversible plain error. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 23**

Exhibit 23included in the Exhibit Index and attached herein restates the *Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 to correct an incorrect Form S-3registration number. 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

VASCO Data Security International, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-62829), Form S-3 (333-108793), and on Form S-1 (333-124458) of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports datedMarch 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports are included in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of VASCO Data SecurityInternational, Inc. 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the company’s adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 123R, *Share-Based Payment*, modifying share-based compensation in 2006. 

 

 

Chicago, Illinois 

August 8, 2007
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Neil Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. As certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. As certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





August 8, 2003

/s/Neil Christiansen

Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 1-2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 26 of 26
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6352 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to modify the penalty for false 

marking, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. LATTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to modify the penalty 

for false marking, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patent Lawsuit Re5 form Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FALSE MARKING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 292 of title 35, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


erowe on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6352 IH

1 (A) in the second undesignated paragraph, 

2 by striking ‘‘any unpatented article’’ and insert3 ing ‘‘unpatented articles’’; 

4 (B) in the third undesignated paragraph, 

5 by striking ‘‘any article’’ and inserting ‘‘one or 

6 more articles’’; and 

7 (C) , by striking ‘‘$500 for every such of8 fense’’ and inserting ‘‘$500, in the aggregate, 

9 for all offenses in connection with such arti10 cles’’; and 

11 (2) by amending subsection (b) to read as fol12 lows: 

13 ‘‘(b) A person who has suffered a competitive injury 

14 as a result of a violation of this section may bring a civil 

15 action in the appropriate district court of the United 

16 States against the person violating this section for recov17 ery of not more than $500 in damages to compensate for 

18 the injury.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to any case pending on the date 

21 of the enactment of this Act, and to any case commenced 

22 on or after such date of enactment. 

Æ 


erowe on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, T. Kendall Hunt, certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|/s/ T. Kendall Hunt                                                                            
|T. Kendall Hunt Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors November 6, 2009
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                  AS ADDED BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Premier
Bancorp, Inc. ("PBI") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), I, John C. Soffronoff,
President and Chief Executive Officer of PBI, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           1.     The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2.     To my knowledge, the information contained in the report
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of PBI as of and for the
                  period covered by the report.

Date: November 8, 2002          By: /s/ John C. Soffronoff
                                    ----------------------
                                    John C. Soffronoff
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Calhoun, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), imposed February 24, 1987, upon his conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty.

*897Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic.

On April 11, 1988, the sentence imposed on February 24, 1987 was vacated and the defendant was resentenced to an indeterminate term of *VA*to 4 years’ imprisonment for his conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, following his plea of guilty to a violation of probation. Accordingly, this appeal is academic. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22221-22222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Partially Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting.

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB), Objective Force 
Soldier.
    Date of Meeting: May 16-17, 2001.
    Time of Meeting: 0800-1700 (both days).
    Place: Fort Bragg, NC.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's (ASB) Summer Study on 
``Objective Force Soldier/Soldier Systems'' will meet for panel 
discussions and report preparation (day one) and study-related site 
visits of Fort Bragg (day two). The first day of meetings (May 16) 
will be open to the public. The site visits, due to their classified 
portions, will be closed to the public in accordance with section 
552b(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) thereof, 
and Title 5, U.S.C. Appendix 2, subsection 10(d). For further 
information, please contact Mr. Mike

[[Page 22222]]

Hendricks, Lead Staff Assistant on 703-617-7048.

Wayne Joyner,
Executive Assistant, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 01-11115 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M