alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6512 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prevent the catastrophic 

loss of wage index reclassification. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2010 

Mr. SPACE (for himself, Mr. AUSTRIA, and Mr. WILSON of Ohio) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prevent 

the catastrophic loss of wage index reclassification. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PREVENTING CATASTROPHIC LOSS OF MEDI4 CARE WAGE INDEX RECLASSIFICATION. 

5 Section 1886(d)(10)(D) of the Social Security Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)(D)) is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(vii) Under the Secretary’s guidelines described in 

9 clause (i), in the case of a hospital that was reclassified 

10 by the Board for fiscal year 2010 to a specific MetropoliVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:02 Dec 10, 2010 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6512.IH H6512

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6512 IH

1 tan Statistical Area or New England County Metropolitan 

2 Area and which would no longer qualify for such reclassi3 fication to that same Metropolitan Statistical Area or New 

4 England County Metropolitan Area for fiscal year 2011 

5 and if for fiscal year 2011 the average wage index for the 

6 geographic area in which such hospital is located is at 

7 least 0.1 less than such hospital’s average wage index for 

8 fiscal year 2010— 

9 ‘‘(I) such hospital’s reclassification for fiscal 

10 year 2011 shall be extended until the end of fiscal 

11 year 2013; 

12 ‘‘(II) such extension shall not result in the re13 calculation of any diluted wage index for hospitals 

14 otherwise utilizing the wage index of the geographic 

15 area to which such hospital is reclassified; and 

16 ‘‘(III) the Secretary shall implement such ex17 tension on a budget neutral basis as though such 

18 hospital satisfied the guidelines published by the 

19 Secretary under clause (i) for fiscal year 2011 and 

20 each subsequent fiscal year to which subclause (I) 

21 applies.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22591-22592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11025]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4644-N-18]

Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration,

[[Page 22592]]

No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, 
identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal 
buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for 
use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of 
announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable 
or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: April 26, 2001.
John D. Garrity,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 01-11025 Filed 5-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
```
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





For
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Wayne Boomer, the chief financial
officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge:





(i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November
5, 2009


By:
                /s/ WAYNE BOOMERWayne
      BoomerChief
      Financial OfficerOn2
      Technologies, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                       385
<INVENTORY>                                     24,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,796
<PP&E>                                          20,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,002
<BONDS>                                         23,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,171
<SALES>                                         91,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,301
<CGS>                                           67,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    93
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,891
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,855
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (173)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
        


</TABLE>
#### CHRISTENSEN v. MATSON NAVIGATION CO.

(District Court, N. D. California, First Division.

September 22, 1913.)

No. 15,423.

Seamen (§§ 11, 29*)—Suit foe Injuries—Pleading.

Exceptions sustained to a count of a libel by a seaman to recover damages for a personal injury but overruled to a count for failure to provide libelant with proper medical care and attention.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Seamen, Cent Dig. §§ 39-44, 186, 187, 188-194; Dec. Dig. §§ 11, 29.*]

In Admiralty. Suit by Robert H. Christensen against the Matson Navigation Company. On exceptions to libel.

Sustained in part.

F. R. Wall, of San Francisco, Cal., for libelant.

Walter H. Linforth, of San Francisco, Cal., for libelee.

DOOLING, District Judge.

The libel excepted to contains two

counts. The first is for damages for injuries to libelant, a seaman, alleged to have been caused throügh the negligence of the libelee, as owner of the vessel Hilonian, in sending her to sea with certain drums of gasoline unlashed upon her deck, and thereby failing to. furnish libelant á safe place in which to work. But it does not appear, nor is it the fact, that the unlashed condition of the drums of gasoline was the proximate or other cause of injury to libelant. The injury was caused by a heavy’ sea shipped in rough weather while libelant was at work under the orders of the mate endeavoring to lash the drums. But it does not appear at all that he was injured by reason of the drums being unlashed, or that the’leaving of the drums unlashed rendered his working place at all unsecure. The exceptions to the first count will be sustained.

The second count is f'or failure to provide proper medical care, attention, etc., to libelant after the injury and is sufficient in form and substance. The exceptions thereto will be overruled.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /S/ Jay M. MeilstrupJay M. MeilstrupChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 14, 2006
# CE2010286EN.01004501.xml

| 22.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/45

---

Tuesday 15 December 2009European Microfinance Facility for Employment and Social Inclusion (Progress) ***I

P7_TA(2009)0106

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 December 2009 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Microfinance Facility for Employment and Social Inclusion (Progress Microfinance Facility) (COM(2009)0333 – C7-0053/2009 – 2009/0096(COD))

2010/C 286 E/10

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2009)0333) and the amended proposal (COM(2009)0340),

having regard to Article 251(2) and the third paragraph of Article 159 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0053/2009),

having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures’ (COM(2009)0665),

having regard to Article 294(3) and the third paragraph of Article 175 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0050/2009),

| 1. | Adopts the position at first reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts the position at first reading hereinafter set out;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, to the Commission and to the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, to the Commission and to the national parliaments.

---

Tuesday 15 December 2009P7_TC1-COD(2009)0096

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 15 December 2009 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Progress Microfinance Facility for employment and social inclusion

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No 283/2010/EU.)

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

D.S., a Child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1244

[ February 28, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Stacy Ross , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 4084 DLA

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney Gene ral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *846Eddie Hall, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), rendered September 10, 1985, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Initially the defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing the complainant to testify as to inculpatory statements made by the defendant to the complainant’s husband 2 or 3 weeks after the commission of the crime. The defendant alleges that the prosecutor withheld notice of the statements, and thus he was denied the right to a fair trial. We disagree.

Statements made by a defendant to individuals who are not law enforcement personnel need not be disclosed to a defendant prior to a trial *(see, People v Mirenda,*23 NY2d 439; *People v Rodriguez,*114 AD2d 525). In this case, however, the prosecutor apparently served a bill of particulars and a voluntary disclosure form in which it was stated that the People did not intend to offer any statements of the defendant made to individuals who were not law enforcement personnel. Since the prosecutor must have learned of such statements immediately prior to or during the course of the trial, fair play required prompt disclosure to the defendant. However, when objecting to the introduction of this evidence, the defense counsel did not specifically object on the basis of the bill of particulars or voluntary disclosure form and, therefore, did not afford the court an opportunity to rule upon this question. For this reason, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review. Moreover, in view of the equivocal nature of the statements in the context of the strong proof in this case, the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial, and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]).

The defendant further contends that he was denied a fair trial as a result of improper comments made by the prosecution during summation. While some of the statements would have been better left unsaid, they were either unpreserved for appellate review or were promptly cured by the Trial Judge *(see, People v Thomas,*50 NY2d 467; *People v Sawyer,*111 AD2d 398, *lv dismissed*66 NY2d 767). In any event, such comments were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230; *People v Roopchand,*107 AD2d 35, *affd*65 NY2d 837).

Finally, we note that, in our determinations, we have con*847sidered the defendant’s *pro se*supplemental brief, and find the contentions raised therein to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Joel A. Friedman., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 2000-1

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  the
Depository Trust Company.


                                     Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 2000-1
                                     By: Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.
                                     Originator of the Trust and Servicer


Date:     03/30/2004                 By:         /s/   Joel A. Friedman
                                           -----------------------------------
                                                  Joel A. Friedman
                                                  Senior Vice President
                                                  and Controller
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 30, 2009

0930 

# Order

September 30, 2009

138180-1

RAYMOND O’NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138180, 138181 COA: 277317, 277318 Wayne CC: 05-515351-NH ST. JOHN HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, RALPH DILISIO, M.D ., and EFSTATHIOS TAPAZOGLOU, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1 ) whether the requiremen ts set forth in the

second sentence of MCL 600.2912a (2) apply in this case; (2) if not, whether the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a genuin e issue of fact with regard to whether the defendants’ conduct proximately caused his injury, or (3) if so, whether Fulton v William Beaumont Hosp , 253 Mich App 70 (2002), was correctly decided, or whether a different approach is required to correctly implem ent the second sentence of § 2912a(2).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to pl ace this case on the January 2010 session calendar for argument and submission. Appella nt’s brief and appendix must be filed no later than November 13, 2009, and appellees’ brief and appendix, if appellees choose to submit an appendix, must be filed no later than December 4, 2009.

The Michigan State Medical Society, Mi chigan Health and Hospital Association, Michigan Association fo r Justice, and Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., are invited to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no la ter than December 16, 2009. Other persons or groups interested in the determ ination of the issues presente d in this case may move the Court for permission to file br iefs amicus curiae, to be f iled no later than December 16,

2009.
##### In this section

              - Codes and standards (5)
              - CRR (10)
              - Events (4)
              - Leadership (8)
              - Wildfire and WUI (16)
              - Planning (11)
              - Data (8)
              - EMS (17)
              - Equipment and technology (17)
              - Fire investigation (6)
              - Funding (5)
              - Hazmat (15)
              - Health and safety (39)
              - Terrorism (4)
              - Training (7)

Infogram

- EMS
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Training
Procedural guidelines for special pathogens

Infogram

- Hazmat
Tactics for responding to alternative fuel vehicle incidents

Infogram

- Equipment and technology
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
Results of first 2 National Institute of Standards and Technology studies on PFAS in turnout gear

Infogram

- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Training
Rapidly removing an unresponsive firefighter from personal protective equipment

Infogram

- Hazmat
- Health and safety
Responding to fires that include energy storage systems (ESS) are a new and evolving hazard

Infogram

- EMS
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Planning
AskRail for rapid access to rail car hazmat information

Infogram

- Data
- Equipment and technology
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Planning
- Terrorism
First responders need real-time hazmat information at rail incidents

Infogram

- Equipment and technology
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
Firefighting foams: PFAS vs. fluorine-free foams

Infogram

- Hazmat
- Health and safety
New information on potential carcinogens in firefighter gear

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
America Burning: 50 years of fire safety and prevention

Infogram

- Data
- Equipment and technology
- Hazmat
CBRNResponder: FEMA's one-stop shop for CBRN incident management and data sharing

Infogram

- Equipment and technology
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
2023 Firefighter Safety Stand Down: Lithium-ion batteries

Infogram

- EMS
- Hazmat
Reducing first responder occupational exposures to opioids

Current Issues

- Equipment and technology
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
Fire and EMS: Be alert for alternative fuel vehicle conversions

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
EMR - ISAC: Making vital, timely, actionable emergency services sector information easily accessible