alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Ho-Shang Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Ho-Shang Lee


Ho-Shang
      Lee


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


(chief
      executive officer)





July
      11,
      2005





This
      certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
A. McIntyre, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas A. McIntyure
Douglas A. McIntyre
Chief Executive Officer
On2 Technologies, Inc.
August 14, 2002
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONUNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersignedcertifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of W. R. Grace & Co. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ A. E. Festa                                   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief Executive Officer             |   |
|                                              |   |
|                                              |   |
| /s/ Robert M. Tarola                              |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

Date: August 8, 2006

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# CE2010087EN.01018801.xml

| 1.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 87/188 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 87/188

---

Tuesday 10 March 2009EC-Armenia agreement: air services *

P6_TA(2009)0082

European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 March 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Armenia on certain aspects of air services (COM(2007)0729 – C6-0519/2008 – 2007/0251(CNS))

2010/C 87 E/41

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2007)0729),

having regard to Articles 80(2) and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0519/2008),

having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0049/2009),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Republic of Armenia. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Republic of Armenia.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-44209; File No. 265-22]


Advisory Committee on Market Information

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
Advisory Committee on Market Information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The fifth meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
Advisory Committee on Market Information (``Committee'') will be held 
on May 14, 2001, in the William O. Douglas Room, at the Commission's 
main offices, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC, beginning at 9 
a.m. The meeting will be open to the public, and the public is invited 
to submit written comments to the Committee.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted in triplicate and 
should refer to File No. 265-22. Comments should be submitted to 
Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anitra Cassas, Special Counsel, 
Division of Market Regulation, at 202-942-0089; Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-1001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 10(a) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10a, and the regulations 
thereunder, the Designated Federal Official of the Committee, David S. 
Shillman, has ordered publication of this notice that the Committee 
will conduct a meeting on May 14, 2001, in the William O. Douglas Room 
at the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 
beginning at 9 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public. This will 
be the fifth meeting of the Committee. The purpose of this meeting will 
be to discuss alternative models for the provision of market data, and 
other issues relating to the public availability of market information 
in the equities and options markets.

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10387 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **7373**

DAVID BRIGHTWELL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
ANDREW MOULTRIE, Doctor; JOHN MOSS, P. A.; DAMON FAYALL , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Chief District Judge. ( 8:1 2

- cv
- 0152 0

- DKC )

Submitted : January 16, 2014 Decided: January 22, 2014

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

David Brightwell, Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, Richard P. Seitz, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Brightwell appeals the district court ’ s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his
civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Acco rdingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Brightwell v. Moultrie , No. 8:12

- cv
01520

- DKC (D. Md. Aug. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00218-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

48th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 048-319312-20

Before Birdwell, Kerr, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE ARK CONTRACTING SERVICES, LLC, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, real parties in 

interests’ response, and relator’s reply and is of the opinion that relief should be 

denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: July 12, 2022
# 3 Reasons Why the National Fire Incident Reporting System Is Important

**Posted: June 21, 2023**

            -   Find similar NFIRSGrams:
            - Data Quality
            - Data Analysis

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

The fire service responds to all types of emergency and nonemergency incidents. The full effect of those responses is only realized if the incidents are documented, reported, shared and analyzed. The fire service’s tool for achieving this full effect is the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS).

NFIRS is the largest database of fire incidents in the world. Fire departments in all states participate in NFIRS. Over 29 million responses to all types of incidents were reported to the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) by participating fire departments in 2021, including nearly 1.1 million fire responses.

Fire department calls are reported in NFIRS every 1.1 seconds.

An emergency medical services/rescue call is reported every 2 seconds.

A fire call is reported every 30 seconds.

## Why is NFIRS important to the fire service?

### 1. NFIRS helps the fire service quantify what it does.

We are connected to data in many of our day-to-day activities (e.g., communicating, relaxing, traveling and working). Everything we do seems to be data-driven. This data is collected and leaves behind a data footprint of our activities.

For the fire service, NFIRS leaves sets of data footprints behind that track and quantify the activities of the fire departments in the United States. NFIRS documents the emergency and nonemergency response activities of fire departments while allowing the fire service to tell its story in an objective manner through its data.

### 2. NFIRS allows the fire service to speak the same language when comparing and sharing its data.

Data is an effective component in communication. The fire service uses NFIRS as an acceptable, common and proven way of communicating because NFIRS is the national standard that fire incident reporting software uses to collect and report emergency response activities of the fire service. It is based on the National Fire Protection Association standards that are overseen by the Technical Committee on Fire Reporting.

More than 22,000 fire departments — 80% of all fire departments in the U.S. — participate in NFIRS. This common language — NFIRS — allows the fire service and other users of NFIRS to document, analyze, and report their data.

### 3. NFIRS is a critical business asset.

The fire service must understand that NFIRS data is a critical business asset. An asset is something of value that adds worth. NFIRS data is an asset because it allows users of NFIRS to identify trends, quantify activities, determine causes, plan the deployment of limited resources, and help in the reduction of loss of life and property caused by fires.

For more information about NFIRS, please contact the NFIRS Support Center: Monday – Friday between 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. ET, at 888-382-3827 or by email at fema-nfirshelp@fema.dhs.gov.
Cómo calentar su 

hogar de manera 

segura

¿Sabía usted? 

Los incendios en el hogar ocurren con más frecuencia en los 

meses de invierno que en cualquier otra época del año.

Siga estos consejos de calefacción para evitar incendios y 

mantenerse seguro durante este invierno:

o Mantenga todos los objetos que puedan incendiarse a una 

distancia de por lo menos 3 pies (0.9144 metros) de todas las 

fuentes de calor, entre otros, las chimeneas, estufas de leña, 

radiadores, calentadores de ambiente o velas.

o Nunca use un horno para calentar su hogar.

o Apague los calentadores de ambiente cuando salga de la 

habitación o se vaya a dormir.

o Pídale a un profesional que limpie e inspeccione el equipo de 

calefacción y chimeneas todos los años.

Para obtener más información y recursos gratis sobre la seguridad 

contra incendios, visite www.usfa.fema.gov.
Topical Fire Report Series June 2022 | Volume 22, Issue 1

At a Glance

Fire Department Overall Run Profile as Reported to 

the National Fire Incident Reporting System (2020)

In 2020, fire departments 

responded to 

26,959,000 

incident r uns or c alls 

as reported to the National 

Fire Incident Reporting System 

(NFIR S). This tot al is a 6% 

decrease in the number of runs 

reported in 2019.

Nearly t wo-thirds (64%) of 

the reported calls required 

emergency medical services 

(EMS) and rescue services from 

fire departments.

Only 4% of all reported fire 

depar tment runs were f ire 

related.

In 2020, fire runs were more 

prevalent on Saturdays, while 

severe weather calls peaked on 

Tuesdays and Thursdays.

More than half (55%) of the 

reported calls were to residential 

properties. Of these calls to 

residential proper ties, 70% 

required EMS or rescue services, 

while only 3% were fire related.

Approximately 8% of reported 

r u n s i n v o l v e d m u t u a l o r 

automatic aid.

The U.S. Fire Administration’s (USFA’s) topical reports are designed to explore facets of the U.S. fire problem as depicted through data collected in the 

USFA’s NFIRS from incidents reported by local response agencies. Each topical report briefly addresses the nature of the specific fire or fire-related 

topic, highlights important findings from the data, and may suggest other resources to consider for further information.

To read the full report, visit: usfa.fema.gov.

National Fire Data Center

16825 S. Seton Ave.

Emmitsburg, MD 21727

usfa.fema.gov
<PAGE> 1

                     Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 1999,
included in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Graybar Electric
Company, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Graybar Electric
Company, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.


St. Louis, Missouri
February 19, 1999



                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
FILED: October 31, 2016

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL S
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 15

- 1591 (1:13

- cv

- 00207

- JAB

- JLW)

___________________

NANCY LUND; LIESA MONTAG

- SIEGEL; ROBERT VOELKER

Plaintiffs

- Appellees

v.

ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

Defendant

- Appellant

------------------------------

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF ARKANSAS; STATE OF FLORIDA; STATE OF INDIANA; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF NEB RASKA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF OHIO; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; STATE OF TEXAS; MEMBERS OF CONGRESS

Amici Supporting Appellant

AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE; AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION; ANT I

- DEFAMATION LEAGUE; CENTER FOR INQUIRY; FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION; INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; SIKH COALITION; UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM; WOMEN OF REFORM JUDAISM

Amici Supporting Appellee___________________

O R D E R

____ _______________ A majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified having

voted in a requested poll of the court to grant the petition for rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc is granted.

The parties and any amici curiae shall file 16 additional paper copies of their

briefs and appendices previously filed in this case within 10 days. The parties may

move, or the court may sua sponte order, the filing of supplemental en banc briefs

pursuant to Local Rule 35(d).

Thi s case is tentatively calendared for oral argument at the January 24

- 26,

2017, session of court

.

For the Court

/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 03-22 

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R 

 Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled 

by the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William A. 

Moorman, having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The 

Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Moorman would provide substantial 

service necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that, effective January 6, 2022, through December 31, 2022, recall-eligible 

retired Judge Moorman is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)

(1). Judge Moorman shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge 

in active service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the 

Chief Judge. It is further 

ORDERED that Judge Moorman shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2022 to review 

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other substantial service 

at the request of the Chief Judge and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up to 90 days or 

its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Moorman's service may be extended beyond 90 days or its 

equivalent. 

DATED: January 6, 2022 BY THE COURT: 

MARGARET BARTLEY 

Chief Judge
<PAGE> 1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 23(A)









                            INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'
                        CONSENT OF PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP




<PAGE> 2
                                  800 Market Street       Telephone 314 206 8500
                                  St. Louis, MO 63101


Price Waterhouse LLP                                      [LOGO]


February 16, 1996

To the Board of Directors
Graybar Electric Company, Inc.

In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated
statements of income and retained earnings and cash flows as of and for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1995 (appearing on pages
16 through 18 of the Graybar Electric Company, Inc. 1996 Annual Report to
Shareholders which has been incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K Annual
Report) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position,
results of operations and cash flows of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. and its
subsidiaries as of and for each of the two years in the period ended December
31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed
above. We have not audited the consolidated financial statements of Graybar
Electric Company, Inc. for any period subsequent to December 31, 1995.


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
Price Waterhouse LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
#### Ryall v. Epps.

Appeal from Marengo Circuit Court.

Tried before the Hon. John C. Anderson.

J. S. Ryall, for appellant.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellee.

*663Opinion by

McClellan, O. J.

*662This was an action of trover, brought by the appellant against the appellee, to recover damages for the conversion by the defendant of certain cattle.

On the trial of the case the plaintiff introduced evidence which tended to show that he was the owner of the cattle alleged to have been converted at the time they were taken up by the defendant.

The defendant claimed that he acquired title through a sale of the cattle made ,by him as pound-keeper, under an act to prevent stock from running at large in certain portions of Marengo county, as amended by an act approved Dec. 9, 1896. This amendatory act requires, among other things, that the sale of impounded cattle shall be made “at public auction at some public place in the neighborhood.”

*663Upon the introduction of all the evidence the plaintiff requested the court to give to the jury the general affirmative charge in his behalf, and duly excepted to the court’s refusal to give .said charge as asked.

On this appeal the court holds that where title was claimed through an impounding under the statute establishing a district in which stock is allowed to run at large, the burden is on him who claims under such title, to show affirmatively that such statute has been strictly complied with, *(McCrossin v. Davis,*100 Ala. 631) ; and that as the evidence in this case not only fails to show that the sale under which the defendant claims, was made at a public place, but it affirmatively shows that the place at which the same was made was not a public place, the court should have given the general affirmative charge requested by the plaintiff.

The judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### HERNDON v. CITY OF HENDERSON.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 13, 1913.)

No. 2511.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas; Gordon Russell, Judge. Action at law by Charles Herndon against the City of Henderson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

Ben B. Cain, of Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff in error. H. B. Marsh, of Tyler, Tex., for defendant in error.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and CALL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court correctly ruled that the plaintiff’s claim in

this case was barred by the ten-year statute of limitations. Judgment affirmed.