APPENDIX 1 - COURT SUPPORT STAFFING
Appendix 1.1

This appendix discusses court support staffing for probation and 

pretrial services offices, courts of appeals, and district and 

bankruptcy courts. It also includes workload used to help 

determine staffing requirements in the courts, and a program 

statement explaining the purpose of these programs. As reflected 

in the statistics provided below, the COVID-19 pandemic has had 

a significant impact on judiciary workload in several different 

areas.

Probation and Pretrial Services

Table A-1.1 Probation and Pretrial Services Workload Indicators1

2020 Actual 

(% Change 

from Previous 

Yr.) 2

2021 Actual 

(% Change 

from Previous 

Yr.) 2

2022 Projected 

(% Change 

from Previous 

Yr.) 3

179,280 176,347 176,700

-1.0% -1.6% 0.2%

46,646 52,915 54,800

0.2% 13.4% 3.6%

83,839 71,647 78,500

-15.0% -14.5% 9.6%

68,974 47,628 61,000

3.5% -30.9% 28.1%

Convicted Persons Under 

Supervision in the 

Community

Charged Defendants 

Supervised in the 

Community

Investigative Reports 

Completed for Bail 

Determinations

Investigative Reports 

Completed for Sentencing 

Determinations

1/For 2020 through 2022, the number of convicted persons and charged defendants 

supervised in the community reflects persons initially received for supervision, under 

supervision for the entire period, or under supervision at the start of the period and 

closed. Persons with cases that fall in more than one of these three categories are 

counted only once. 

2/Actual data for 2020 and 2021 is based on the 12-month period ending June 30.

3/Estimates for 2022 are based on projections for the 12-month period ending June 30.

Probation and Pretrial Service Officers

Probation officers are federal law enforcement officers that 

protect the community. They work with persons under 

supervision “post-conviction,” after they are tried and found guilty 

of a federal crime and after they are released from prison. Using 

techniques grounded in social science research, otherwise known 

as evidence-based practices or research-to-results, probation 

officers work with persons under supervision to assist them in 

becoming contributing members of the community and leading 

crime-free lives. Officers assess each person under supervision’s 

risk of recidivism; identify dynamic risk factors that, when 

addressed, affect the individual’s likelihood to engage in future 

criminal activity; and apply supervision interventions tailored to 

reduce risk. These interventions include helping persons under 

supervision to either reestablish, or secure for the first time, 

appropriate housing, employment, and legitimate community 

relationships. Officers also provide cognitive skills counseling 

and leverage programs offered by other federal agencies and local

social service organizations. Probation officers make sure that 

persons under supervision comply with release conditions set by 

the court and address any issues that affect their ability to comply. 

The officers monitor persons under supervision through phone 

calls and personal contacts and direct them to services that help 

persons under supervision, including substance abuse or mental 

health treatment, medical care, training, and employment 

assistance. Without probation officers, the court would not be 

able to manage the risk that persons under supervision pose to 

individuals or the community by verifying their locations and 
Appendix 1.2

employment, monitoring their associates, restricting their travel, 

and taking actions to make sure they obey the law. 

Pretrial services officers work with defendants after they are 

charged with federal crimes and while they are awaiting trial. 

They help ensure that defendants released to the community 

commit no crimes while awaiting trial and return to court as 

required. 

Both probation and pretrial services officers investigate 

defendants and persons under supervision for the court by 

gathering and verifying information about them. Their 

investigations involve interviews with defendants and persons 

under supervision to find out about their backgrounds, including 

family, education, employment, finances, physical and mental 

health, and alcohol or drug abuse. Officers perform criminal 

history record checks and interview other people who can provide 

helpful information, such as family members, employers, and law 

enforcement officials. They also review records, such as court, 

school, military, financial, and employment records. 

This information is used to produce a pretrial services report and 

presentence report. The pretrial services report recommends 

whether to release or detain the defendant before trial and 

addresses whether the defendant is likely to stay out of trouble and 

return to court as required. The presentence report recommends 

sentencing options under the federal sentencing guidelines, 

addresses the offense’s impact on the victim, and determines the 

person under supervision’s ability to pay fines and restitution. It 

also recommends release conditions for the court to impose to 

help structure the person under supervision’s movement and

behavior in the community. Release conditions are tailored to the 

individual. For example, the court may require that the person 

under supervision get drug testing and treatment, find and keep a 

job, or be placed on location monitoring. 

As explained in the Salaries and Expenses chapter, Department of 

Justice prosecution activity as well as the enactment and 

implementation of the First Step Act (FSA) have had a significant 

impact on the workload of the probation and pretrial services 

program. Leading up to the pandemic, workload throughout the 

probation and pretrial services system was increasing due to the 

government’s prosecutorial practices and the early release of 

inmates as a result of the FSA. Workload declined during the 

peak of the pandemic; however, workload has been climbing since 

March 2021 and is expected to return to near pre-pandemic levels

in late 2022 and 2023.
Appendix 1.3

Table A-1.2 Persons Under Supervision by Type of Supervision 1 

Year Probation Supervised Release Parole BOP Custody Total

ACTUAL2 2011 22,604 104,671 1,870 174 129,319

2012 22,419 108,528 1,664 174 132,785

2013 21,114 109,516 1,473 259 132,362

2014 19,903 111,076 1,373 245 132,597

2015 19,191 112,750 1,245 242 133,428

2016 18,275 118,318 1,140 149 137,882

2017 17,139 117,662 1,003 143 135,947

2018 15,740 114,278 920 98 131,036

2019 15,179 111,943 893 105 128,120

2020 14,063 111,710 837 265 126,875

2021 12,415 110,700 736 398 124,249

ESTIMATED3 2022 12,500 112,900 800 500 126,700

1

Includes only those cases that are open for supervision as of June 30 of the corresponding year. 

2

Actual data for 2011 through 2021 as of June 30 of the corresponding year. 

3

Estimates for 2022 are based on projections for June 30, 2022. 
Appendix 1.4

Table A-1.3 The Changing Supervision Population - Persons Under Supervision on Probation vs. Persons Under Supervision 

Released from Prison1

Year Total

ACTUAL3 2011 22,604 17% 106,715 83% 129,319

2012 22,419 17% 110,366 83% 132,785

2013 21,114 16% 111,248 84% 132,362

2014 19,903 15% 112,694 85% 132,597

2015 19,191 14% 114,237 86% 133,428

2016 18,275 13% 119,607 87% 137,882

2017 17,139 13% 118,808 87% 135,947

2018 15,740 12% 115,296 88% 131,036

2019 15,179 12% 112,941 88% 128,120

2020 14,063 11% 112,812 89% 126,875

2021 12,415 10% 111,834 90% 124,249

ESTIMATED4 2022 12,500 10% 114,200 90% 126,700

Offenders on Probation Offenders Released from Prison2

1

Includes only those cases that are open for supervision as of June 30 of the corresponding year. 

2

Includes terms of supervised release, parole, mandatory release, and military parole.

3

Actual data for 2011 through 2021 is based on the 12-month period ending June 30.

4

Estimates for 2022 are based on projections for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2022. 
Appendix 1.5

District Courts 

Table A-1.4 Major District Court Workload Indicators1

Filings 2020 Actual 2021 Actual 2022 Estimate

64,853 59,500 58,800

-11.2% -8.3% -1.2%

79,122 75,407 74,700

-12.6% -4.7% -0.9%

421,082 374,250 352,700

43.5% -11.1% -5.8%

Criminal Case 

Filings

Criminal 

Defendants 

Filed

Civil Case 

Filings 2

1

Data for each year is for the 12-month period ending June 30. 

2 The historically large numbers of civil filings in the 12-month 

periods ending June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2021 are mainly due to the 

multidistrict litigation Case 2885 (In Re: 3M Combat Arms Earplug 

Products Liability Litigation) in the Northern District of Florida. 

District Clerks

The clerks’ offices are the public business offices for the 

district courts and provide specific centralized management in 

case-related and logistical areas. Employees in clerks’ offices 

perform essential functions necessary for the operation of the 

courts, such as: 

• attorney admissions to practice in the district;

• case intake, docketing of pleadings and motions;

• service of process, events scheduling, receipting and

accounting for fees and fines collected;

• case tracking, provision of court reporting, and court

interpreting services;

• alternative dispute resolution programs;

• statistical reporting;

• training attorneys on the case management system

(CM/ECF), and

• jury management.

All these functions are essential elements in processing 

criminal cases and resolving civil cases. Public and private 

sector entities rely on effective case processing by the clerks’ 

offices. 

The proper functioning of the district court clerks’ offices 

enhances the efficiency of the offices of the U.S. Attorney, U.S. 

Marshals Service, Federal Public Defender, and Probation and 

Pretrial Services. Other participants, including litigants, 

attorneys, witnesses, court reporters, court interpreters, expert 

witnesses, the media, and jurors are also impacted by the 

effective operations of the clerks’ offices. To enable these 

court participants to work together effectively, the clerks’ office 

manages courtroom space, information technology services, 

audio and video systems, financial management, budget 

decentralization, personnel administration, and other 

administrative functions, as well as the support required in the 

courtroom for the proper functioning of proceedings. The 

judicial system as a whole benefits from the professional 

management services provided by the clerks’ offices. 
Appendix 1.6

As explained in the Salaries and Expenses chapter, criminal 

case filings are, in part, influenced by the number of U.S. 

Attorneys and the emphasis placed on prosecution of offenses 

such as illegal immigration, drug crimes, and violations of 

firearms laws. Criminal filings were on pace to be higher than 

the previous year through March 2020. However, new 

criminal filings saw a significant decline in April and May 

2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic that resulted in an 

overall decrease for the entire year. Despite these national 

trends, significant spikes in caseload are possible in particular 

districts due to more localized factors. For example, on July 9, 

2020, the Supreme Court held in McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 

U.S. __ (2020), that land in northeastern Oklahoma reserved 

for the Creek Nation pursuant to the 1832 Treaty with the 

Creeks remains “Indian country” for purposes of the Major 

Crimes Act (MCA) because Congress has never expressly 

disestablished the reservation. District courts in Oklahoma are 

experiencing significant increases in federal prosecutions 

stemming the Supreme Court’s McGirt v Oklahoma decision.

As of September 2021, post-McGirt annual criminal felony 

filings have increased by 158 percent in the Northern District 

of Oklahoma and by 243 percent in the Eastern District of 

Oklahoma. 

Civil case filings are driven by prisoner petitions, social 

security cases, U.S. plaintiff recovery cases, large-volume 

multi-district litigation cases, and diversity of citizenship 

1 A district court has subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of 

citizenship when the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of 

interest and costs, and is between parties not from the same state or country. 

cases1. Also, civil case filings decreased significantly from the 

previous year, due almost exclusively to a significant decrease 

in tort actions filed in product liability and personal injury cases 

as part of the multidistrict litigation (MDL) Case No. 2885 (In 

Re: 3M Combat Arms Earplug Products Liability Litigation) in 

the Northern District of Florida. 

Court Interpreters

The district courts use both staff and contract court interpreters. 

Staff court interpreters serve in district courts with a substantial 

daily need for interpreting services. This is particularly true in 

courts along the border with Mexico and courts located in large 

metropolitan areas, where locating, scheduling, and contracting 

with court interpreters is not practical due to their frequent need 

for interpreting services. 

Spanish is the most frequently needed language for interpreting 

events in the courts, comprising 95 percent of all reported 

interpreting events in FY 2021. In FY 2021, there were 

157,772 court events that required the services of an interpreter, 

with 149,903 of those in Spanish. 

Pro Se Law Clerks

The objective of the pro se law clerk program is to receive, 

prepare, and process civil complaints filed against the 

government by prisoners and other individuals without attorney 

representation. Pro se law clerks review complaints for 
Appendix 1.7

procedural adequacy to permit judges to proceed with the 

disposition of the cases. This conserves judicial resources — 

without pro se law clerks, district judges and magistrate judges 

would have to perform this work. The number of pro se law 

clerks is determined by a formula driven by prisoner petition 

filings. For the 12-month period ending June 30, 2021, there 

were 49,658 petitions filed. This represents a 12.6 percent 

decrease from the 56,823 filings in statistical year 2020. 

Death Penalty Law Clerks

Death penalty law clerks serve both as substantive legal 

resources to judges in death penalty habeas corpus matters, and 

as case management monitors, since capital cases are generally 

lengthy and involve numerous issues. The staffing formula for 

these positions provides credit for death penalty cases pending 

in federal court that are not stayed. Courts must have three 

pending death penalty cases to be eligible for a half-time 

position, and nine cases for a full-time position. For the 12-

month period ending June 30, 2021, there were 492 pending, 

unstayed death penalty cases in the district courts. 
Appendix 1.8

Percent 

Increase/

Decrease

2011 289,630 1.5% 78,764 0.7%

2012 286,232 -1.2% 73,455 -6.7%

2013 283,087 -1.1% 69,642 -5.2%

2014 298,713 5.5% 64,027 -8.1%

2015 280,037 -6.3% 60,866 -4.9%

2016 290,430 3.7% 61,021 0.3%

2017 271,721 -6.4% 58,121 -4.8%

2018 281,202 3.5% 67,257 15.7%

2019 293,520 4.4% 73,012 8.6%

2020 421,082 43.5% 64,853 -11.2%

2021 374,250 -11.1% 59,500 -8.3%

ESTIMATED 2 2022 352,700 -5.8% 58,800 -1.2%

Year Social 

Security Diversity Prisoner Filings All Other Total

ACTUAL1 2011 15,697 101,508 53,692 118,733 289,630

2012 17,043 94,568 53,606 121,015 286,232

2013 19,121 89,359 55,369 119,238 283,087

2014 19,530 102,568 62,402 114,213 298,713

2015 19,102 86,865 52,844 121,226 280,037

2016 18,407 83,170 70,863 117,990 290,430

2017 18,953 75,449 61,031 116,288 271,721

2018 19,115 89,018 53,626 119,443 281,202

2019 17,903 100,629 54,445 120,273 293,250

2020 18,259 234,084 56,823 111,916 421,082

2021 23,615 190,578 49,658 110,399 374,250

ESTIMATED2 2022 16,000 181,800 47,500 107,400 352,700

Criminal 

Filings

Table A-1.6 Components of Civil Caseload 

Table A-1.5 Civil and Criminal Filings

Year Civil Filings

Percent 

Increase/ 

Decrease

ACTUAL1

1

Actual data for 2011 through 2021 is based on the 12-month periods ending June 30. 

2

Estimates for 2022 are based on projections for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2022. 
Appendix 1.9

Courts of Appeals and Circuit Units

Table A-1.7 Appellate Court Workload1

2020 

Actual

2021 

Actual

2022 

Estimate

2.6% -6.6% -1.7%

Appeals Filings 49,044 45,790 45,000

1

For the 12-month periods ending June 30. 

Circuit Executives

The principal responsibility of the circuit executive’s office is 

to act as the secretariat for the circuit’s judicial council and its 

committees, and in some circuits, for the court of appeals and 

its committees. In this capacity, the circuit executives’ offices 

participate in policy oversight and assist in many areas of 

circuit-wide importance. These include planning for the 

effective and efficient use of space and facilities, information 

technology, financial management and budget decentralization, 

and planning and organizing the circuit’s judicial conference. 

The circuit executives’ offices also provide vital administrative 

and logistical support to the courts of appeals, including 

information technology, procurement, budget management, and 

personnel administration.

Appellate Clerks

The clerks’ offices are the public business offices for the 

appellate courts and provide specific centralized management in 

case-related and logistical areas. Employees in clerks’ offices 

perform essential functions necessary for the operation of the 

courts, such as: 

• recording and maintaining all case filings, including

public records and information needs;

• providing guidance to lawyers, litigants, and the public;

• distributing case materials to judges for decisionmaking; and

• providing vital logistical support.

The case-related workload of the clerks’ offices can fluctuate 

with changes in case filings. 

Case decisions in appellate courts are made either by panels of 

three judges or, in some instances, by an en banc court, where 

all the judges on the court review the case. Appellate judges 

reside in locations throughout the geographic area of a circuit. 

Appellate clerks’ offices are situated at the headquarters of the 

circuit, providing a central public business office for the judges, 

lawyers, litigants, and the public. Clerks’ offices receive case 

materials for filing, maintain the central files, and arrange for 

judges to convene in panels as necessary for case decisions. 

Inquiries about cases, procedures, and related matters are 

directed to the clerks’ offices. Materials are assembled, as 

appropriate, and dispatched to judges. Lawyers are advised of 

the schedule for decision-making. Decisions are made after 

oral argument hearings or submissions on briefs that are 

scheduled by the clerks’ offices. Decisions are filed in the 

clerks’ offices, which are then responsible for distribution of 
Appendix 1.10

the decisions to the parties and the public, including posting on 

court websites. 

Staff Attorneys

Staff attorneys are central legal staff who assist the court in the 

disposition of appeals. Cases handled may include direct 

criminal appeals involving sentencing guidelines issues; all pro 

se appeals, including collateral attacks on criminal convictions 

by state and federal prisoners, and civil rights suits under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983; employment discrimination cases; immigration 

cases; social security appeals; emergency matters; original 

proceedings; counseled motions; and death penalty cases. The 

workload is substantial and has grown over the past 25 years. 

Staff attorney offices currently assist their courts by handling an 

estimated 45 – 60 percent of the case related work. The work 

has increased in complexity, largely due to major legislative 

changes affecting prisoner and habeas law. Staff attorneys may 

also assist with attorney discipline matters, supporting CJA 

matters, and producing orientation programs for judges and law 

clerks. Staff attorney legal review of pro se and counseled 

cases materially assists the judges and contributes to timely 

dispositions. 

Pro se cases represented 48.1 percent of national appellate 

filings in FY 2021. Staffing resources are provided through a 

formula derived from work measurement studies. The current 

formula is driven primarily by case filings and is refreshed 

annually. 

Circuit Mediators

Circuit mediators facilitate the disposition of cases on appeal 

through negotiated settlements, without appellate judicial 

involvement. Circuit mediators are skilled, seasoned lawyers 

who perform sensitive, confidential settlement work. The 

attorneys often are able to streamline or dispose of issues in 

cases not easily settled. Distinct from staff attorneys, circuit 

mediators promote the voluntary settlement or withdrawal of 

appeals without court action. The program conserves judicial 

resources and improves appellate case management.

Librarians

The national court library program is a network of 12 circuit 

headquarters libraries and 85 smaller satellite libraries, typically 

located in district courthouses. Although the library program 

falls administratively under the courts of appeals, court 

librarians serve and support the information and research needs 

of all federal courts and judges: appellate, district, magistrate, 

and bankruptcy. In addition to federal judges, library services 

are provided to tens of thousands of judiciary researchers, 

including law clerks and chambers staff, staff attorneys, 

mediators, clerks of court, probation and pretrial services 

personnel, and public defenders. Many court libraries also 

serve the public, including pro se litigants and bar association 

members.

Librarians deliver comprehensive research, reference, and 

instruction services, and procure and facilitate access to the 

most reliable, authoritative, accurate, and up-to-date research 
Appendix 1.11

resources. Library staff members also manage the acquisition 

and development of chambers’ legal resource collections.

To support the information needs of on-site personnel as well as 

remote users within their broad and geographically dispersed 

areas, court libraries implement digital communication 

technologies, deliver web-based training services, and provide 

comprehensive online access to research collections. Librarians 

design website and internet resources, develop online research 

guides, create current event awareness services that push 

content directly to their users, and support the design and 

publication of court materials. Subject specialization and deep 

legal and jurisdictional expertise are required of court 

librarians, as well as the ability to support multidisciplinary 

research in economics, science, medicine, social sciences, 

engineering, technology, and other business- and industryspecific fields.

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Clerks

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994 requires that each circuit 

establish a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) unless the 

judicial council of the circuit finds that either there are 

insufficient judicial resources in the circuit, or the establishment 

of a BAP would result in undue delay or increased cost to 

parties in bankruptcy cases. There are currently five BAPs 

nationally. A BAP is composed of bankruptcy judges within a 

circuit who are appointed by the circuit’s judicial council to 

decide, with the consent of all parties, appeals from bankruptcy 

court decisions. Even where a BAP exists, bankruptcy appeals 

may be heard by the district court, if a party so chooses. 

A BAP requires a minimum of four bankruptcy judges, each 

from a different district, because the legislation prohibits a 

bankruptcy judge from hearing an appeal that originated in the 

district for which he or she was appointed. The BAP clerks’ 

offices have support functions and responsibilities similar to the 

appellate clerks’ offices.

As explained in the Salaries and Expenses chapter, the judiciary 

currently projects that appellate case filings will decrease in 

2022, mainly due to projected decreases in criminal appeals and 

other appeals, which would include bankruptcy appeals and 

administrative agency appeals. Administration initiatives, 

legislative initiatives, and court decisions can have significant 

effects on some annual totals. 
Appendix 1.12

Bankruptcy Courts 

Table A-1.8 Bankruptcy Court Workload1

2020 2021

Actual Actual

682,363 462,309 640,300

-11.8% -32.2% 38.5%

2022 

Estimate

Bankruptcy 

Filings

1

For the 12-month periods ending June 30.

Bankruptcy Clerks

The clerk’s office is responsible for administrative activities 

pertaining to processing bankruptcy case filings. Employees in 

clerks’ offices perform essential functions necessary for the 

operation of the courts, such as: 

• case tracking and scheduling, including the use of the

case management system (CM/ECF);

• statistical reporting; and

• receipting and accounting for fees and fines collected.

All these functions are essential elements in processing 

bankruptcy cases. Public and private sector entities rely on 

effective bankruptcy case processing by the clerks’ offices. 

The bankruptcy court clerks’ offices facilitate processing cases, 

which helps individuals, attorneys, and businesses filing cases 

nationwide. To enable court participants to work together 

effectively, the clerks’ offices manage courtroom space, 

information technology services, audio and video systems, 

financial management, budget decentralization, personnel 

administration, and other administrative functions, as well as 

the support required in the courtroom for proceedings. 

The judicial system, and community as a whole, benefit from 

the professional management services provided by the 

bankruptcy clerks’ offices. 

Bankruptcy Administrators 

Nearly all bankruptcy cases are administered by an impartial 

case trustee. In most bankruptcy courts, case trustees are 

overseen by the United States Trustee Program, which is a 

component of the Department of Justice. The United States 

Trustee assigns trustees to cases, maintains and appoints the 

panel of trustees, monitors the conduct of parties in cases, 

oversees related administrative functions, and acts to ensure 

compliance with applicable laws and procedures. 

However, two states—Alabama and North Carolina—operate 

under a different structure. In each of the six bankruptcy 

districts within those two states, a bankruptcy administrator 

oversees case administration and performs the bulk of the duties 

required of United States Trustees. Bankruptcy administrators 

are employed and overseen by the judiciary but have virtually 

the same authority as a United States Trustee, with a few 

exceptions. 

As explained in the Salaries and Expenses chapter, bankruptcy 

filings have decreased each year over the last decade, but the 

rate of decrease appeared to be leveling out prior to April 2020. 

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, bankruptcy filings declined 
Appendix 1.13

significantly in April, May, and June 2020 compared to the 

same three-month period in 2019. This decline led to an overall 

decrease for 2020. Filings continued to decrease through the 

12-month period ending June 2021. The judiciary is concerned

that the pandemic may result in a significant and rapid increase

in bankruptcy filings as the economy continues to be impacted.

Because filing levels drive staffing needs in bankruptcy courts,

such increases will result in additional workload impacts on

bankruptcy courts. A sudden spike in filings may result in

courts facing challenges in processing these filings. An

increase in filings is expected based on historical trends that

suggest bankruptcies trail adverse economic conditions. Also,

the federal moratorium on eviction notices and foreclosures is

over. These measures likely helped some consumers and

businesses avoid bankruptcy, but without additional measures

these same consumers and businesses may have to consider

bankruptcy in the near term.
Appendix 1.14

Table A-1.9 Components of Bankruptcy Filings 

ACTUAL1 2011 1,083,671 13,556 432,333 1,529,560

2012 914,015 11,664 385,949 1,311,628

2013 778,845 10,139 348,994 1,137,978

2014 669,976 8829 321,278 1,000,083

2015 568,679 7,112 303,945 879,736

2016 509,769 8,532 300,858 819,159

2017 489,011 7,628 299,398 796,037

2018 479,151 7,686 288,741 775,578

2019 475,069 7,876 290,416 773,361

2020 436,919 8,345 237,099 682,363

2021 335,886 7,559 118,864 462,309

ESTIMATED2 2022 413,600 8,500 218,200 640,300

Chapter 7 Chapter 13 Total Chapters 9, 11, 

12, & 15 Year 

1

Actual data for 2011 through 2021 is based on the 12-month periods ending June 30. 

2 Estimates for 2022 are based on projections for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2022.