alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Scott *against*G. H. Conover.

Where money has been paid by defendant, under a judgment which is subsequently reversed, and it appears by the record, that such payment was made, the court will order restitution.

But where it does -not appear by the record that the money has been paid, there the party must sue out a *scire facias quare restitutionem non.*

The judgment in this case had been reversed, on a writ of ■error, after execution had been issued, and the ahiount of' the money due on the judgment, had been paid by the defendant into the hands of the sheriff.

*Wood,*now applied for a writ of restitution, and read affidavits, proving the payment of the money bjr the defendant to. the sheriff.

*Wall,*for the plaintiff, objected to the application; that a writ of restitution could only be awarded in those cases where it'appeared by the record that the money had been paid. ■ But in this case there was no such evidence of the payment of the money, as would authorise the court to awardva writ of restitution.

The form of the writ, *Archolds Practical Forms,*199, shews that it must appear that the party applying for restitution has paid the money.' In this case it does not appear that the money has been raised, but only that the defendant’s property has been sold.

*Wood,*replied.

Ch. Justice.

Two questions are presented to us upon this application. *First.*Whether the judgment being reversed on writ of error, we can order restitution. *Second,*for what sum restitution should be awarded, whether to the full amount, which has passed out of the'hands of the defendant, into the hands of the officer, or only for that sum which has *73passed from tbe officer into the hands of the plaintiff. As rto the first point, where it appears upon record that the money has been levied and paid over to the plaintiff, the court will order the restitution. But where it does not appear by the record, there the party seeking restitution, must sue out a *scire facias quare restitutionem non ;*and to this the party may plead; and in *Lilly’s Entries,*will be found the form of the plea.

In this case it does not appear upon tbe record that the money has been paid, and at the common law a *scire facias*would be required ; and we see no authority to change this practice. The affidavits cannot be said to be such record.

As to certioraris, to justice’s court, upon the reversal of a justice’s judgment, we do not put the party to the necessity of suing out a *scire facias quare restitutionem non,*because it wotild be too expensive. But as to proceedings in this court, we must pursue the common law practice. As to the second point, it is not necessary to give any opinion at present; but the court would refer the counsel to the case of *Montgomery*v. *Bruere,*where it appeared that the whole money had passed into the hands of the sheriff, and neither a part or the whole of the money had been paid by the sheriff to the plaintiff; and *Mr. Montgomery’s*counsel resisted the application on that ground, and the court ordered restitution for the whole amount which had been paid into the hands of the sheriff

Buie refused.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10532]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

Notice of Meeting of the Industry Sector Advisory Committee on 
Small and Minority Business (ISAC-14)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Industry Sector Advisory Committee on Small and Minority 
Business (ISAC-14) will hold a meeting on May 9, 2001, from 3 p.m. to 
4:30 p.m. The meeting will be opened to the public from 3 p.m. to 4:30 
p.m.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for May 9, 2001, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the USA Trade Center/Ronald 
Reagan Building, Training Room B located at 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Millie Sjoberg and Pam Wilbur (202) 
482-4792, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20230 (principal contact), or myself on (202) 395-
6120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the meeting the agenda topics to be 
addressed will be the trip to the OECD Montreal Meeting in June and the 
vote on the transition papers.

Christina Sevilla,
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for 
Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 01-10532 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
```
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February      4, 2010 |   |                                                                            |
|----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |   |        /s/ Jeffrey S. Keuntjes                                             |
|                                   |   | Jeffrey      S. Keuntjes                                                        |
|                                   |   | Vice      President - Finance (principal financial and accounting      officer) |

----

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6489 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6489

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 100 percent 
   reimbursement for medical assistance provided to Native Hawaiians 
through a federally qualified health center or a Native Hawaiian health 
                              care system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2010

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 100 percent 
   reimbursement for medical assistance provided to Native Hawaiians 
through a federally qualified health center or a Native Hawaiian health 
                              care system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native Hawaiian Medicaid Coverage 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. 100 PERCENT FMAP FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO A NATIVE 
              HAWAIIAN THROUGH A FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER OR A 
              NATIVE HAWAIIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM UNDER THE MEDICAID 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The third sentence of section 1905(b) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) is amended by inserting ``; 
and, with respect to medical assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian 
(as defined in section 12(2) of the Native Hawaiian Health Care 
Improvement Act) through a federally qualified health center or a 
Native Hawaiian health care system (as defined in section 12(6) of such 
Act), whether directly, by referral, or under contract or other 
arrangement between such federally qualified health center or Native 
Hawaiian health care system and another health care provider'' before 
the period.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to medical assistance provided on or after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# CSST Installation As a Contributing Factor in a Fire

**Posted: Aug. 16, 2022**

            -   Find similar NFIRSGrams:
            - Coding
            - Other Modules

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

This NFIRSGram explains how to identify Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing (CSST) installation as a contributing factor to a fire using the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS).

In the United States, approximately 500,000 new homes per year have CSST installed in them — approximately half of the number of new homes built each year that use gas for heating and cooking. As of 2012, an estimated seven million homes in the U.S. had CSST installed. Since 1989, approximately one billion feet has been installed in residential, commercial and industrial structures. Source: csstsafety.com

Several jurisdictions have contacted the NFIRS Support Center questioning how they could identify CSST as the possible cause of a house fire. The NFIRS does not specifically list CSST as equipment, and since the issue with CSST is an installation issue, the U.S. Fire Administration recommends the following when identifying CSST installation as a contributing factor in a fire.
            - Code “Item First Ignited” as “64” — flammable liquid/gas in or escaping from container or pipe.
            - Code the “Equipment Involved in Ignition” as “373” — gas regulator. As this code includes propane, butane, liquefied petroleum (LP), or natural gas regulators and flexible hose connectors to gas appliances.
            - Code the “Type of Material First Ignited” as “11” — natural gas for structures being supplied by natural gas or, “12” — LP gas, for structures being supplied by LP gas.
            - Code the “Factors Contributing to Ignition” as “43” — installation deficiency.
            - In the narrative section of the report, note that CSST was a contributing factor in the ignition of the fire.

For more information about NFIRS, please contact the NFIRS Support Center: Monday – Friday between 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. ET, at 888-382-3827 or by email at fema-nfirshelp@fema.dhs.gov.
EXHIBIT 12
 EXHIBIT 12
 CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(UNAUDITED)
 (amounts in thousands)
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Interest expense (1)
    
    $
    5,955
    
    
    $
    2,534
    
    
    $
    2,307
    
    
    $
    4,192
    
    
    $
    8,467Interest factor in rental expense
    
    
    5,021
    
    
    
    5,102
    
    
    
    4,898
    
    
    
    5,673
    
    
    
    6,871(a) Fixed charges, as defined
    
    $
    10,976
    
    
    $
    7,636
    
    
    $
    7,205
    
    
    $
    9,865
    
    
    $
    15,338(Loss) earnings from continuing operations
before income taxes and minority interest
    
    $
    (29,209
    )
    
    $
    70,576
    
    
    $
    41,975
    
    
    $
    40,127
    
    
    $
    21,031Fixed charges
    
    
    10,976
    
    
    
    7,636
    
    
    
    7,205
    
    
    
    9,865
    
    
    
    15,338(b) Earnings, as defined
    
    $
    (18,233
    )
    
    $
    78,212
    
    
    $
    49,180
    
    
    $
    49,992
    
    
    $
    36,369(c) Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (b / a)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    10.2x
    
    
    
    6.8x
    
    
    
    5.1x
    
    
    
    2.4x
  (1)
    
    Includes amortization of finance costs.
#### BROWN, Respondent, v. CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY NAT. BANK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by A. F. Allen Brown, as permanent trustee under the will of N. A. Lowry, deceased, against the Chautauqua County National Bank and George S. Gifford.

No opinion. Order appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,782
<INVENTORY>                                      7,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,504
<PP&E>                                         130,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,265
<BONDS>                                        138,357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,181
<SALES>                                         72,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,676
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date: September 15, 2005

/s/ Neil Christiansen

Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 437TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on June 3, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or

reverse your judgment between

Robert F. Crunk, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-14-00810-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2013CR0707

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on August 17, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Fireplace and 

Wood Stove 

Safety

Follow these heating safety tips to help 

keep your home fi re safe this winter.

 Keep anything that can burn at least 3 feet 

from your fi replace or wood stove.

 Do not burn paper in your fi replace or wood 

stove.

 Put the fi re out before you go to sleep or leave 

your home.

 Have your chimney inspected and cleaned each 

year by a professional.

 Put ashes in a metal container with a lid. Place 

the container outside at least 10 feet from 

your home.

feet

10

Fireplace and 

Wood Stove 

Safety

Follow these heating safety tips to help 

keep your home fi re safe this winter.

 Keep anything that can burn at least 3 feet 

from your fi replace or wood stove.

 Do not burn paper in your fi replace or wood 

stove.

 Put the fi re out before you go to sleep or leave 

your home.

 Have your chimney inspected and cleaned each 

year by a professional.

 Put ashes in a metal container with a lid. Place 

the container outside at least 10 feet from 

your home.

feet

10

Fireplace and 

Wood Stove 

Safety

Follow these heating safety tips to help 

keep your home fi re safe this winter.

 Keep anything that can burn at least 3 feet 

from your fi replace or wood stove.

 Do not burn paper in your fi replace or wood 

stove.

 Put the fi re out before you go to sleep or leave 

your home.

 Have your chimney inspected and cleaned each 

year by a professional.

 Put ashes in a metal container with a lid. Place 

the container outside at least 10 feet from 

your home.

feet

10
Fireplace and 

Wood Stove Safety

Fireplace safety

 Keep a glass or metal screen in front of your 

fi replace to prevent embers or sparks from 

jumping out.

 Make sure fi replace “on” switches and remote 

controls are out of the reach of children.

Wood stove safety

 Make sure your wood stove has been tested 

by a qualifi ed testing laboratory.

 Keep the doors of your wood stove closed 

unless loading or stoking the live fi re.

For more information, visit 

www.usfa.fema.gov.

   usfi re

Fireplace and 

Wood Stove Safety

Fireplace safety

 Keep a glass or metal screen in front of your 

fi replace to prevent embers or sparks from 

jumping out.

 Make sure fi replace “on” switches and remote 

controls are out of the reach of children.

Wood stove safety

 Make sure your wood stove has been tested 

by a qualifi ed testing laboratory.

 Keep the doors of your wood stove closed 

unless loading or stoking the live fi re.

For more information, visit 

www.usfa.fema.gov.

   usfi re

Fireplace and 

Wood Stove Safety

Fireplace safety

 Keep a glass or metal screen in front of your 

fi replace to prevent embers or sparks from 

jumping out.

 Make sure fi replace “on” switches and remote 

controls are out of the reach of children.

Wood stove safety

 Make sure your wood stove has been tested 

by a qualifi ed testing laboratory.

 Keep the doors of your wood stove closed 

unless loading or stoking the live fi re.

For more information, visit 

www.usfa.fema.gov.

   usfi re
#### In the Matter of Sara F. Levitt, Respondent, v Edward J. Mahoney et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Erie County, et al., Respondents, and Mark A. Pasternak et al., Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition dismissed and designating petition validated. Memorandum: By order to show cause, petitioner sought to raise objections to respondents’ petitions in addition to those which she had filed with the Board of Elections. Respondents were not given adequate notice in petitioner’s moving papers of her intent to introduce new objections nor were they apprised of those objections until the Special Term proceeding resulting in their petitions being invalidated.

While it is within Special Term’s jurisdiction to hear new objections not previously filed with the Board of Elections, fundamental fairness requires that respondents have notice of the intent to produce such material, and of the specific objections being made so that they may adequately prepare a defense *(Matter of Jones v Board of Elections,*122 AD2d 905; *Matter of Belak v Rossi,*96 AD2d 1011, *lv denied*60 NY2d 552; *Matter of Starr v Board of Elections,*89 AD2d 978; *Matter of Flowers v Wells,*57 AD2d 636). Respondents could not have prepared a defense or introduced evidence on their behalf without having this information before the return date in Special Term. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—Election Law.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1987.)
EX-10.19





 Exhibit 10.19 

Spouse Consent Letter 
 To: Genetron
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd. 
 Whereas: 
  

	1.	 I, Yan Shida (ID card number: [            ]), am
the spouse of the natural person Wei Shuyan (ID card number: [            ]). Wei Shuyan holds 11.050% equity of Genetron Health (Beijing) Co., Ltd.( hereinafter referred to as
“Target Equity Interest”); 


  

	2.	 With respect to the aforementioned Target Equity Interest held by Wei Shuyan, Wei Shuyan entered into the
Exclusive Option Agreement with other related parties on July 30, 2019, entered into the Equity Pledge Agreement with other related parties on July 30, 2019 and entered into the Shareholder Voting Rights Entrustment Agreement with other
related parties on July 30, 2019; and 


  

	3.	 Genetron Health (Beijing) Co., Ltd entered into the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement with Genetron
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd. on July 2, 2019. This Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement together with the aforementioned Exclusive Option Agreement, Equity Pledge Agreement and Shareholder Voting Rights Entrustment Agreement constitute the
contractual control arrangement regarding Genetron Health (Beijing) Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractual Control Arrangement”). 



Hereby, I confirm and irrevocably undertake as follows on July 30, 2019: 
  

	1.	 I confirm that I have noted and agree that my spouse Wei Shuyan entered into the Exclusive Option Agreement,
Equity Pledge Agreement and Shareholder Voting Rights Entrustment Agreement. The aforementioned Target Equity Interest of Genetron Health (Beijing) Co., Ltd held by Wei Shuyan is not our joint property. I have no rights and interests in such
Target Equity Interest, including the rights gained from the Contractual Control Arrangement. I will never take any action to interfere with the Contractual Control Arrangement, including but not limited to claiming any right over the aforementioned
Target Equity Interest and the Contractual Control Arrangement. 


  

	2.	 I hereby undertake, I have not actually participated in and will not plan to actually participate in the
operation and management of Genetron Health (Beijing) Co., Ltd in the future, and I will not claim any right related to the equity interests and assets of Genetron Health (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 



  
 1 














	3.	 If, for any reason, I obtain all or part of the aforementioned equity, I unconditionally agree to be a party of
the Contractual Control Arrangement and be bound by the Contractual Control Arrangement. In this respect, I undertake to take all necessary actions and to sign all necessary documents. 



This letter will take effect immediately upon its signature by me and will be continuously effective. 

  
 2 













 (This page is intentionally left blank and is the signing page of this Spouse Consent
Letter) 
  

			
	Undertaker’s Signature:	 	 /s/ Yan Shida

	 	 	Date: July 30, 2019



  
 3