alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Seguridad contra 

incendios causados por 

las secadoras de ropa

¿Sabía usted?

Usted está en mayor riesgo de incendio de una secadora de ropa si no 

limpia el filtro de pelusas y los conductos de ventilación de la secadora.

Siga estos consejos de seguridad sencillos para evitar un incendio causado 

por una secadora de ropa en su hogar. 

ĵ Pídale a un profesional que instale la secadora y le dé mantenimiento. 

ĵ No use la secadora sin un filtro de pelusas. Limpie el filtro de pelusas antes y 

después de cada ciclo. 

ĵ No olvide limpiar la parte de atrás de la secadora donde pueden acumularse 

las pelusas. 

ĵ Verifique el sistema de ventilación detrás de 

la secadora para asegurarse de que no esté 

dañado, aplastado o restringido. 

ĵ Asegúrese de que la tapa exterior del 

conducto de ventilación abra cuando está 

operando la secadora.

Para obtener más información y recursos gratis sobre la seguridad 

contra incendios, visite www.usfa.fema.gov.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,067-03

EX PARTE JAMES LOUIS LANGE II, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 16-2213-CR-B-A-B IN THE 25TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GUADALUPE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced

to fifty years’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because he was

incompetent at the time he pleaded guilty. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him

to relief. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970). Accordingly, the record should be developed. 

The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §

3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the
2

record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to

hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants

to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall

immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

plea was involuntary. The trial court shall also make specific findings as to whether Applicant was

competent to plead guilty. The trial court maymake anyother findings and conclusions that it deems 

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: August 25, 2021

Do not publish
**Stewards of the Sea Menu**

                    - Stewards of the Sea Home
                    - About the Program and Exhibit
                    - Press Room                        - News
                      - Videos
                      - Photos
                    - Meet Stewie — the Navy's Environmental Mascot
                    - Fleet Installations and Environmental

**Science of Sound**

----

**Sound Navigation and Ranging (SONAR)**

Originally an acronym for **SO**und **N**avigation **A**nd **R**anging, sonar is used to find and identify objects in the water. Some types of sonar can be used to calculate distance to objects by measuring the time between when a sound wave is sent out and when the reflected sound, or echo, is received. Navy Sailors use sonar to detect submerged objects such as submarines and mines.  The ocean can be a very noisy place, full of sounds from natural sources like marine animals, breaking waves, rain, lightning, and earthquakes, to man-made sources like ships and seismic exploration. This makes listening for enemy submarines extremely difficult. It takes specialized training and lots of practice to be able to find modern submarines,  which are designed to be extremely quiet and carry weapons that can fire from long distances.   **Passive Sonar**Passive sonar uses specialized transducers called hydrophones (or underwater microphones) to listen to sounds in the ocean. These hydrophones convert received sounds into electrical signals that are then sent to a computer for a sonar operator to look at, listen to, and analyze. Passive sonar does not transmit sound into the water and allows sonar operators to detect objects without giving away their position.  **Active Sonar**Active sonar is the most effective means available for locating objects underwater. Active sonar sends out a pulse of energy that travels through water, reflects off of an object, and returns to a receiver. Active sonar has the ability to locate objects that are too quiet to be detected using passive sonar technology.​ Echolocation  Humans developed sonar by studying how some animals navigate and detect prey.Some marine mammals, such as dolphins, use a form of active sonar called echolocation. By emitting clicks, or short pulses of sound, marine mammals can listen for echoes and detect objects underwater. Echolocation can be used to locate prey, navigate their environment, and avoid obstacles in low-visibility conditions.

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# CE2010117EN.01023201.xml

| 6.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 117/232 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 117/232

---

Wednesday 25 March 2009Common consular instructions: biometric identifiers and visa applications ***II

P6_TA(2009)0167

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 March 2009 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Common Consular Instructions on visas for diplomatic missions and consular posts in relation to the introduction of biometrics including provisions on the organisation of the reception and processing of visa applications (5329/1/2009 – C6-0088/2009 – 2006/0088(COD))

2010/C 117 E/42

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council common position (5329/1/2009 – C6-0088/2009),

having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0269),

1

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0143/2009),

| 1. | Approves the common position; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position;

| 2. | Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;

| 3. | Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

| 4. | Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

Official Journal of the European Union

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, 10.7.2008, P6_TA(2008)0358.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date: January 19, 2006

/s/ Neil Christiansen

Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Gonzalez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Bookson, J.), rendered on September 14, 1987, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Milonas and Rubin, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         May 7, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m..                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/E2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Tracy A. Shahan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, NIH/NIAMS, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4952.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 20, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-10353 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00008

- CR

E THAN J AY C ALLIHAN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 235th District

Court

of Cooke County ( CR19

- 00775 )

March 4, 2021

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s ju dgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ / s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service Board of Governors

### Board Votes To Close April 13, 2001, Meeting

By telephone vote on April 13, 2001, the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting held in Washington, DC via teleconference. The Board determined that prior public notice was not possible.

# ITEMS CONSIDERED:

1. Strategic Planning/Postal Reform.

2. Postal Rate Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision on Further Reconsideration in Docket No. R2000-1, Omnibus Rate Case.

3. Personnel Matters.

# GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION:

The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, David G. Hunter, at (202) 268-4800.

David G. Hunter,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10265 Filed 4-20-01; 2:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,695]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on February 20, 2001, in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of workers at Drummond Company, Inc., Jasper, Alabama.

The Department of Labor has determined that the petition is invalid. Under the Trade Act of 1974, a petition may be filed by a group of three or more workers in an appropriate subdivision of a firm, by a company official, or by their union or other duly authorized representative. The petitioners are not employees of Drummond Company, Jasper, Alabama. The petition was signed by three petitioners who are not authorized to file on behalf of workers of the company. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 12th day of April, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-10944  Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Official Form 410 (Committee Note) (12/23)

Committee Note

Part 3 of Form 410A is amended to provide for 

separate itemization of principal due and interest due. 

Because under § 1322(e) the amount necessary to cure a 

default is “determined in accordance with the underlying 

agreement and applicable nonbankruptcy law,” it may be 

necessary for a debtor who is curing arrearages under 

§ 1325(a)(5) to know which portion of the total arrearages is 

principal and which is interest.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2551

_____________________________

CLARENCE DUNN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

November 7, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, RAY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell Dixon,

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

McCarthy HITT

- Next NGA West JV ) ASBCA Nos. 6357 1 , 6357 2 , 6357 3

)

Under Contract No. W912DQ

- 19

- C

- 7001 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Martin R. Salzman, Esq.

Jason A. Kamp, Esq.

John T. Gallagher, Esq.

Hendrick Phillips Saltzman & Siegel

, P.C.

Atlanta, GA

Eric L. Nelson, Esq.

Smith, Curry and Hancock, LLP

Atlanta, GA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Virginia Murray, Esq.

Kristine R. Hoffman, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District, Kansas City

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Appellant moves to dismiss ASBCA No. 63573 without prejudice. The motion

states that Respondent does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, ASBCA No. 63573

is dismissed from the Board’s docket without prejudice. The consolidated appeals

ASBCA Nos. 63571 an d 63572 remain pending before the Board.

Dated: May 29, 2024

THOMAS P. MCLISH

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 6357 1 , 6357 2 , 6357 3

, Appeals of

McCarthy HITT

- Next NGA West JV , rendered in conformance with the Board’s

Charter.

Dated: May 30, 2024

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Ser vices

Board of Contract Appeals
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21

                       GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.


                            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                            --------------------


Graybar International, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Financial Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Electric de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation

Graybar Electric Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation

Graybar Canada Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation

Graybar Services, Inc., an Illinois corporation

Distribution Associates, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Business Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Electric Canada Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation

Graybar Commerce Corporation, a Delaware corporation

Commonwealth Controls Corporation, a Missouri corporation

Graybar Newfoundland Limited, a Newfoundland and Labrador corporation
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Axsys Technologies, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”), I, David A. Almeida, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| March 4, 2004            |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     |
|                     |
| /s/ David A. Almeida     |   |
| David A. Almeida         |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AxsysTechnologies, Inc. and will be retained by Axsys Technologies, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 4.3


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm




We have
issued our report dated December 5, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 455 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-233800) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the
aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the
caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.







 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 5, 2019