alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STEWART v. BOSTON *&*M. R. R.

(District Court, D. New Hampshire.

February 24, 1916.)

No. 171.

New Trial <@=>71 — Gkounds—Weight of Evidence.

In an action for personal injuries, a verdict for defendant would not be set aside, though regarded by the District Judge as wrong, where there was a substantial conflict in the evidence, and the jury could reasonably have found for defendant.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see New Trial, Cent. Dig. §§ 144, 145; Dec. Dig. <@=>71.]

At Law. Action by Thomas Stewart against the Boston & Maine Railroad. Verdict for defendant, which plaintiff moves to set aside.

Motion denied.

Hollis & Murchie, of Concord, N. H., for plaintiff.

Streeter, Demond, Woodworth & Sulloway, of Concord, N. H., for defendant.

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This case was tried by jury. The plaintiff claimed that his foot was caught between the rail and planking of the Boston & Maine Railroad track in the city of Manchester, and that he was unable to extricate himself; that he gave an outcry and a warning to a train which was approaching at a low rate of speed; that the railroad people were careless in not discovering him and stopping; and that they ran over him and cut off both feet. The railroad claimed that the man’s foot was not caught in the rail, but that he was standing beside the track and that he was struck by the moving train; that he was careless, and that the railroad was not careless.

There was a conflict in the evidence upon the question as to how the thing happened. < The jury found for the defendant, and, in order to malee that finding, the jury must have accepted the defendant’s theory.

The plaintiff seasonably moved to set aside the verdict on the ground that it was against the evidence or the weight of the evidence, and upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

*863I felt at the time the verdict was rendered that the plaintiff’s claim as to how the injury occurred was the correct one, and that the verdict should have been the other way. Yet there was a substantial conflict in the evidence, and reckoning witnesses by numbers I can see that the jury could reasonably enough have found for the defendant. So there is nothing under the doctrine of preponderance of evidence or weight of evidence which would warrant me in disturbing the verdict on that ground, and while I think the finding was wrong, I find nothing to justify me in granting the motion to set the verdict aside.

An additional ground urged for setting aside the verdict is newly discovered evidence.

Proofs of the newly discovered evidence are presented in the form of affidavits. I am going to do, perhaps, what is an unusual thing, decline to decide this question as a question of fact and say what the probable effect of the new evidence would be upon a new trial, and rule as a matter of law that the newly discovered evidence is not of sufficient potentiality to warrant an order granting a new trial. I do this for the purpose of giving the plaintiff an opportunity to raise questions for the Circuit Court of Appeals, if under the circumstances it can become a question of law.
# CE2010224EN.01005401.xml

| 19.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 224/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 224/54

---

Thursday 17 September 2009Common agricultural policy CAP: support schemes for farmers *

P7_TA(2009)0015

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 September 2009 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006 and (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (COM(2009)0321 – C7-0093/2009 – 2009/0084(CNS))

2010/C 224 E/23

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2009)0321),

having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0093/2009),

having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A7-0004/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6270 

To amend chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, to require commemorative works in the District of Columbia and its environs to be constructed 

of materials that are grown, produced, or manufactured in the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. KILDEE (for himself, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. LIPINSKI, 

and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, to 

require commemorative works in the District of Columbia 

and its environs to be constructed of materials that are 

grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Monuments Assembled 

5 and Domestically Engineered Act’’ or the ‘‘MADE Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6270 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR USE OF AMERICAN MATERIALS 

2 IN CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN COMMEMO3 RATIVE WORKS. 

4 (a) REQUIREMENT.— 

5 (1) DECISION CRITERIA.—Section 8905(b) of 

6 title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(8) AMERICAN MATERIALS.—A commemora9 tive work shall be constructed using material— 

10 ‘‘(A) that, in the case of unmanufactured 

11 material, is mined or produced in the United 

12 States; and 

13 ‘‘(B) that, in the case of manufactured 

14 material, is manufactured in the United States 

15 substantially all from articles, materials, or sup16 plies mined, produced, or manufactured, as the 

17 case may be, in the United States.’’. 

18 (2) CRITERIA FOR ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION

19 PERMIT.—Section 8906(3) of such title is amended 

20 by inserting before the semicolon the following: ‘‘, 

21 and such contract documents demonstrate that the 

22 material to be used in the construction of the com23 memorative work complies with the criteria de24 scribed in section 8905(b)(8) of this title, as deter25 mined in accordance with regulations implementing 

26 the Buy American Act (10 U.S.C. 10a et seq.)’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6270 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to commemorative works for 

3 which construction permits are issued under section 8906 

4 of title 40, United States Code, on or after the date of 

5 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000172

09-MAR-2018

08:16 AM
Topical Fire Report Series

At a Glance

August 2021 | Volume 21, Issue 7

Multifamily Residential Building Fires 

(2017-2019)

Each year, from 2017 

to 2019, an estimated 

average of

106,700

multifamily 

residential 

building fires

were reported to fire 

departments in the 

United States.

These fires caused an estimated annual average of:

400 

deaths

3,875

injuries in property loss

29%

Multifamily residential building 

fires accounted for 29% of all 

residential building fires.

71%

Small, confined fires accounted 

for 71% of multifamily residential 

building fires.

JAN

Multifamily residential building 

fire incidence was slightly higher 

in the cooler months, peaking in 

January at 10%.

Cooking, at 74%, was the 

leading cause of multifamily 

residential building fires — 95% 

were small, confined fires with 

limited damage.

Cooking areas and kitchens (33%) 

were the primary areas of origin 

for nonconfined multifamily 

residential building fires.

Smoke alarms were present in 

64% of nonconfined multifamily 

residential building fires.

The topical reports are designed to explore facets of the U.S. fire problem as depicted through data collected in the U.S. Fire Administration’s National 

Fire Incident Reporting System. Each topical report briefly addresses the nature of the specific fire or fire-related topic, highlights important findings 

from the data, and may suggest other resources to consider for further information.

To read the full report, visit usfa.fema.gov.

National Fire Data Center

16825 S. Seton Ave.

Emmitsburg, MD 21727

usfa.fema.gov
Exhibit 10.16

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE
COOPERATIVES NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTORS

Compensation Arrangement for the
Cooperatives Named Executive Officer

Following is a
description of the compensation arrangement for Stephen R. Wright, the
Cooperatives Named Executive Officer:

| |                    |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | ------------------ | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Stephen R.
 Wright |  | $210,000
 annual base salary beginning July 1, 2009, pursuant to the terms of his
 employment agreement with the Cooperative.                                                                                     
| |                    |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| |                    |  | Cash bonus
 equal to 10% of the increase, if any, in Pro-Facs net income over its net
 income for fiscal year 2008, as determined in accordance with the terms of
 his employment agreement with the Cooperative.

Compensation
Arrangements for Directors

Directors of
the Cooperative are paid an annual retainer. Each director who is a
member-grower receives an annual retainer of $15,000, except Mr. Call, who
serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Cooperative, receives an
annual retainer of $25,000. Each non-member grower director, namely Mr. Harrington
Jr., Mr. Lipinski and Mr. Stotz receive a retainer at an annual rate of
$40,000.



---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION

        By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Syndicated Food Service International, Inc.

                    Signed this 12th. day of December, 2003.



<TABLE>
<S>                                                 <C>
By:  /s/ Barry L. Nogay                              By:  /s/ Thomas P. Tanis, Jr.
--------------------------------------------         --------------------------------------------
Barry L. Nogay                                       Thomas P. Tanis, Jr.
Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer      President and Chief Executive Officer
</TABLE>



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Syndicated Food Service
International, Inc. and will be retained by Syndicated Food Service
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


November 14, 2019


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 1970


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1970 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-233301 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By                 /s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER           
	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	Senior Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9825]



[[Page 20948]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1081]


Grant of Authority; Establishment of a Foreign-Trade Zone, Fort 
Lauderdale, Florida Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for `` * * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida (the Grantee), has 
made application to the Board (FTZ Docket 12-99, filed 3/19/99), 
requesting the establishment of a foreign-trade zone in the Fort 
Lauderdale, Florida, area, adjacent to the Port Everglades Customs port 
of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (64 FR 14859, 3/29/99); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the 
privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the 
records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 241, at the sites 
described in the application, subject to the Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, and further subject to the 
grantee's implementation of the site management plan presented for the 
record in this case.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of April 2000.
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
William M. Daley,
Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer.
    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9825 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# Procedural Guidelines for Special Pathogens

**Posted: March 21, 2024**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - EMS
            - Hazmat
            - Health and safety
            - Training

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

On March 5, the National Emerging Special Pathogens Training and Education Center (NETEC) released EMS Model Procedural Guidelines for Special Pathogens to complement the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response’s “EMS Infectious Disease Playbook.”

These guidelines provide step-by-step instructions that any emergency medical services (EMS) agency can adapt and incorporate into their policies and procedures for managing high-consequence infectious disease (HCID) patients including:
            - Procedures for donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE).
            - PPE breaches.
            - Assessment of an EMS clinician who has become incapacitated while wearing PPE.
            - Biohazard spills.
            - Handling HCID waste.

Also provided is guidance on ambulance cleaning, disinfection and modification to protect surfaces and EMS personnel from exposure to potentially infectious body fluids.

These model procedural guidelines were developed by the NETEC EMS/Patient Transport Work Group comprising subject matter experts from the EMS Biosafety Transport Consortium who support the federally designated Regional Emerging Special Pathogen Treatment Centers for transport and management of patients suspected or confirmed to have an HCID.

This article is based on content in theMarch 21, 2024 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted)Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of
American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge:

3.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A Amendment No. 1 for the period
     ended December 31, 2003, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit
     32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  December 15, 2004           /s/  Andrew P. Calerich
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer
Grilling Fire 

Safety

Stay fire safe this summer! Follow these grilling safety tips.

Only use your grill outside. 

Keep it at least 3 feet from 

siding, deck rails and eaves.

Keep a 3-foot safe zone 

around your grill. This will 

keep kids and pets safe.

Open your gas grill before 

lighting.

Keep an eye on your grill, 

fire pit or patio torches. 

Don’t walk away from them 

when they are lit.

Clean your grill after each 

use. This will remove grease 

that can start a fire.

Place the coals from your 

grill in a metal can with a 

lid once they have cooled.

Stay fire safe this summer!

For more information and resources, visit www.usfa.fema.gov.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.13

                  SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE
               COOPERATIVE'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTORS


Compensation Arrangement for the Cooperative's Named Executive Officer

Following is a description of the compensation arrangement for Stephen R.
Wright, the Cooperative's Named Executive Officer:

      Stephen R. Wright            $130,000 annual base salary, pursuant to the
                                   terms of his employment agreement with the
                                   Cooperative

Compensation Arrangements for Directors

Directors of the Cooperative are paid an annual retainer. Each director who is a
member-grower receives an annual retainer of $8,000, except Mr. Call, who also
serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Cooperative, receives an
annual retainer of $12,000. Each non-member grower director, namely Mr. Pierson,
Mr. Harrington Jr. and Mr. Stotz receive an annual retainer of $20,000.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 77 (Thursday, April 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

[USCG-2000-6942]


Commercial Fishing Safety Listening Sessions

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting; Change of location.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The location of the Coast Guard Commercial Fishing Vessel 
Safety Action Plan Listening Session, on Saturday, May 20, 2000, from 
10 a.m. to 2 p.m. has been changed. The meeting has been moved from the 
Italian American Club, 1903 Cabrillo Avenue, San Pedro, California to 
Canetti's Seafood Grotto, 309 East 22nd Street, San Pedro, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this notice, contact 
Lieutenant Jennifer Williams, or Ensign Chris O'Neal, telephone 202-
267-2008, fax 202-267-0506.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Original notice of this meeting was 
published in the Federal Register, Volume 65, Number, March 16, 2000.

    Dated: April 13, 2000.
R.C. North,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety 
and Environmental Protection.
[FR Doc. 00-9936 Filed 4-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,509,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,251,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,617,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     640,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,509,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               630,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               285,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                179,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    60,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            119,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>