alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 647 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 647

    To authorize the International Boundary and Water Commission to 
    reimburse State and local governments of the States of Arizona, 
   California, New Mexico, and Texas for expenses incurred by such a 
    government in designing, constructing, and rehabilitating water 
          projects under the jurisdiction of such Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2009

 Mr. Hinojosa (for himself, Mr. Ortiz, and Mr. Cuellar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the International Boundary and Water Commission to 
    reimburse State and local governments of the States of Arizona, 
   California, New Mexico, and Texas for expenses incurred by such a 
    government in designing, constructing, and rehabilitating water 
          projects under the jurisdiction of such Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT FOR CERTAIN WATER PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The International Boundary and Water Commission is 
authorized to reimburse State and local governments of the States of 
Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas for expenses incurred by 
such a government in designing, constructing, and rehabilitating water 
projects under the jurisdiction of such Commission.
    (b) Application.--Subsection (a) shall apply to expenses incurred 
for a water project by any such State or local government designed, 
constructed, or rehabilitated before or after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





For
      purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Matthew Frost, Interim Chief
      Executive Officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge:





(i)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30,
      2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/
                MATTHEW FROSTMatthew
                Frost*Interim
                Chief Executive Officer**On2
                Technologies, Inc.*





November
      7, 2008
# CE2010184EN.01013801.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/138 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/138

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Agreement between the EC and Pakistan on certain aspects of air services *

P6_TA(2009)0218

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on certain aspects of air services (COM(2008)0081 – C6-0080/2009 – 2008/0036(CNS))

2010/C 184 E/32

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2008)0081),

having regard to Articles 80(2) and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0080/2009),

having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0188/2009),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INCOME FUND XI, L.P. AS OF
MARCH 31, 1999, AND THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         678,978
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,950,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (112,888)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             227
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,517,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,739
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,330,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,517,034
<SALES>                                        168,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,896
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,070
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,885
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             76,885
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    76,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.69<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.69<F1>
<FN>
<F1>NET INCOME (LOSS) PER PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Amendment No. 2 to Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Amendment No. 2 to 
 Discover Financial Services

 Employee Stock Purchase Plan 
 The Discover Financial Services Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as heretofore amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended, effective as of December 1, 2009, in the following respects: 

 

	 	1.	By deleting the phrase “after receiving such right” where it appears in the third paragraph of Section 2 of the Plan and inserting in lieu thereof the
phrase “after the right is granted”. 

  

	 	2.	By deleting the fourth paragraph of Section 4 of the Plan and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 

  

	 	 	“Following his or her enrollment in the Plan, a participant may change the amount of his or her payroll deduction effective as of the first day of any payroll
period by so directing the Company or its designated agent at the time and in the manner specified by the Committee.” 

  

	 	3.	By deleting the phrase “whole and fractional shares” where it appears in the second sentence of the fifth paragraph of Section 4 of the Plan and
inserting in lieu thereof the phrase “whole and, unless otherwise provided by the Committee, fractional shares”. 

  

	 	4.	By deleting the second and third sentences of Section 7(a) of the Plan and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 

  

	 	 	“Upon any suspension of participation, the participant’s payroll deductions shall cease, and the cash credited to such participant’s Purchase Account on
the date of such suspension shall be delivered as soon as practicable to such participant.”
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Emile R. Jordan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Emile R. Jordan
----------------------------------------
Emile R. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer

Dated May 19, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       15
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Axsys Technologies, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, Stephen W.Bershad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| February 23, 2005    |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| /s/ STEPHEN W. BERSHAD    |   |   |
| Stephen W. Bershad        |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |
|                           |        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Axsys Technologies, Inc. and willbe retained by Axsys Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Case 1:07-cv-05649-GEL Document 7-2 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05649-GEL Document 7-2 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05649-GEL Document 7-2 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05649-GEL Document 7-2 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05649-GEL Document 7-2 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 5 of 5
#### Christopher Fazio, Respondent, v C.B. Warehousing, Inc., Defendant, and International Forwarding Systems, Inc., Doing Business as Atlas Moving and Storage, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Title.)

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant International Forwarding Systems, Inc., doing business as Atlas Moving and Storage (hereinafter Atlas), appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated August 14, 1986, as denied its *738motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the plaintiffs second amended complaint as against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The appellant’s time to answer the plaintiffs second amended complaint is extended until 30 days after service upon it of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

We cannot say that it was an abuse of discretion for the court to deny the appellant’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on account of the plaintiffs failure to seek a default judgment *(cf., Rosenbaum v Ace Tr. Corp.,*112 AD2d 210). The plaintiff submitted an affidavit of merits which was uncontested by Atlas *(see, Woodward v City of New York,*119 AD2d 749). Moreover, it appears that long before expiration of the one-year period specified in CPLR 3215 (c) *(cf., Monzon v Sony Motor,*115 AD2d 714), confusion arose as to whether the nondefaulting codefendant’s attorney, retained pursuant to a liability insurance policy naming both defendants as insureds, would also appear on behalf of Atlas *(cf., Woodward v City of New York, supra).*Under the circumstances presented, including the existence of a meritorious claim and the apparent lack of prejudice *(cf., Woodward v City of New York, supra),*it was not improper to deny Atlas’s motion. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.
..

Honorable S. K. Long County Attorney Jefferson County Beaumont, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. 0-4404-A Re: Reconsideration of Opinion No. O-4404 (Jefferson County Bonds)

We acknowledge receipt ofyour request for a reconsideration of opinion No. o-4404, together with a rather exhaustive brief onthe points involved.

We have carefully reconsidered our former opinion in the light ofthe brief submitted, andwhile we appreciate your position we still think **our** former opinion as to the eligibility ofthe Dryden Ferry Bridge bonds for participation in the County and Road District Highway Fund is correct. On May 22, 1942, we hada request from Honorable Melvin Combs, Criminal District Attorney of Jefferson County, to reconsider opinion ‘9-4404, and it appears thatafter reconsjdering same, hewas advised thatwe were “convinced that the conclusion reached therein is correct.”

There has been no such change in the law since that date which would make these bonds eligible, andyouare advised thatwe adhere to the conclusion reached in said opinion o-4044.
APPROVED MAR 14.1944 /s/ Geo~.G. Blackburn Acting Attorney General of Texas Yours very truly ATTORNEYGENERALOF TEXAS

By /s/ C. F. Gibson

C. F. Gibson Assistant CFG:ncd/cm APPROVED Opinion Committee BY /s/~ BWB Chaxrman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
financial statements filed for the period ending December 31, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                  10059
<SECURITIES>                            28299
<RECEIVABLES>                           29582
<ALLOWANCES>                             1094
<INVENTORY>                             11750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        87865
<PP&E>                                  59022
<DEPRECIATION>                          42141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         161979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   23662
<BONDS>                                   579
<COMMON>                                  645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                             133173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           161979
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       134654
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           97887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        23269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         17833
<INCOME-TAX>                             7138
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     10695
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            10695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.61
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 01-054] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of prospective patent license. 

# SUMMARY:

                        NASA hereby gives notice that Advanced Cybernetics Group (ACG), of Cupertino, CA has applied for an exclusive license to practice the invention disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,774,669 entitled “Scalable Hierarchical Network Management System for Displaying Network Information in Three Dimensions” which is assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective                               ( print page 21417)                            grant of a license should be sent to Ames Research Center.                     

# DATES:

Responses to this notice must be received by June 29, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Padilla, Chief Patent Counsel, NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 202A-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, telephone 650-604-5104. 

Dated: April 23, 2001. 

Edward A. Frankle, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 01-10614 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 762 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 762

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To validate final patent number 27-2005-0081, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINAL PATENT AND LAND RECONFIGURATION IN CLARK COUNTY AND 
              LINCOLN COUNTY, NEVADA.

    Patent No. 27-2005-0081 and its associated land reconfiguration 
issued by the Bureau of Land Management on February 18, 2005, is hereby 
affirmed and validated as having been issued pursuant to and in 
compliance with the provisions of the Nevada-Florida Land Exchange 
Authorization Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-275), the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and the Federal Land Policy 
Management Act of 1976 for the benefit of the desert tortoise and other 
species and their habitat to increase the likelihood of their recovery. 
The process utilized by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and 
the Bureau of Land Management in reconfiguring the lands as shown on 
Exhibit 1-4 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Planned 
Development Project MSHCP, Lincoln County, NV (FWS-R8-ES-2008-N0136) 
and the reconfiguration provided for in Special 

              

Condition 10 of Army Corps of Engineers Permit No. 200125042 are hereby 
ratified.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 762

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To validate final patent number 27-2005-0081, and for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                 355
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       32,904
<ALLOWANCES>                        12,854
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0
<PP&E>                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      26,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0
<BONDS>                             20,674
<COMMON>                               155
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              1
<OTHER-SE>                           3,426 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        26,634
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     2,436
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     1,810
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   2,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (4,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (4,471)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      8,349
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         3,878 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .25 
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        

</TABLE>
Argued and submitted November 20, 1998,

dismissed as moot February 10,

petition for review denied April 29, 1999 (328 Or 465)

#### THOMAS W. SWEARENGEN, *Appellant, v.*George BALDWIN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, *Respondent.*

(96C-1111; CA A98459)

974 P2d 264

Harrison Latto argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed as moot. *Hamel v. Johnson,*158 Or App 276, 974 P2d 260 (1999); *Jones v. Thompson,*156 Or App 226, 968 P2d 380 (1998).