alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Improving Emergency Vehicle Lighting and Visibility at Roadway Incidents

**Posted: March 7, 2024**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Health and safety

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

On Feb. 28, the Federal Highway Administration’s National Operations Center of Excellence held a webinar to explain research results that can be used to implement improvements to emergency vehicle lighting as well as improvements to responder and vehicle visibility at roadway incidents.

Dr. John Bullough, program director at the Light and Health Research Center at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discussed the following research findings:
            - Reducing light intensity at night will maintain alerting but allow responders to be seen more accurately.
            - Just a little steady illumination around the vehicle will make responders much easier to see at night.
            - Reflective vehicle markings can sometimes be “too bright,” making emergency responders more difficult to see at night.
            - “High/low” flashing is better than “on/off” flashing for closure detection.
            - Synchronized lights help reduce visual chaos, and sequential lights provide visual information.
            - Blue and red lights are rated most visible; blue and white lights are most glaring.

The findings come from more than a decade of studies by Dr. Bullough and colleagues at the Light and Health Research Center. The research was sponsored by the U.S. Fire Administration, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the Emergency Responder Safety Institute, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program and SoundOff Signal.

Watch the webinar recording for explanations of and citations to the supporting research for each of the above findings.

This article is based on content in theMarch 7, 2024 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00008-CR

ETHAN JAY CALLIHAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 235th District 

Court

of Cooke County (CR19-00775)

March 4, 2021

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_________________

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-12-00359-CV 

________________________

UNIT PETROLEUM COMPANY, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

DAVID POND WELL SERVICE, INC., 

D/B/A, D.W.P. PRODUCTION, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the 31st District Court 

Lipscomb County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 11-04-4287; Honorable Steven Emmert, Presiding 

 

July 25, 2014 

 

ORDER OVERRULING APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING 

 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

 

On May 19, 2014, this Court issued its Opinion and Judgment in this cause, 

reversing the judgment of the trial court and declaring the rights of the parties.1 

 

1

See Unit Petroleum Co. v. David Pond Well Serv., No. 07-12-00359-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 

5354 (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 19, 2014, no pet. h.)
2

Appellee, David Pond Well Service d/b/a D.W.P. Production, has filed a Motion for 

Rehearing relating to that portion of the opinion and judgment which grants Appellant, 

Unit Petroleum Company, the “exclusive executive right to establish a proration unit 

encompassing any of its leasehold estate.” Remaining convinced that our original 

opinion and judgment are correct, we write to address Appellee’s primary argument.

Appellee’s concern focuses on language in this Court’s opinion and judgment

stating that Appellant has the “exclusive” right to establish a proration unit 

encompassing its own leasehold estate. As used in our opinion and judgment, 

“exclusive” means exclusive as between Appellant and Appellee, as opposed to being 

held by Appellee alone or by Appellee and Appellant jointly. Our opinion and judgment 

should not be read as limiting the well-established authority of the Texas Railroad 

Commission. Appellee’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
<Page>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

      Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Lazare Kaplan International Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated August
19, 2004, included in the 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders of Lazare Kaplan
International Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 333-40225 and No. 333-92077) pertaining to the Lazare Kaplan
International Inc. 1997 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan and Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-52303) pertaining
to the Lazare Kaplan International Inc. 401(k) Plan for Savings and Investment
of our reports dated August 19, 2004, with respect to the May 31, 2004
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Lazare Kaplan International
Inc. and subsidiaries included and/or incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May 31, 2006.

Ernst & Young, LLP

  New York, New York
  August 24, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Makita
Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that,
to such officers knowledge:  1.
    
    The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period
ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Makita CorporationBy:
    
    /s/  Masahiko GotoName:
    
    Masahiko GotoDate:  July 30, 2004
    Title:
    
    President and Representative DirectorMakita CorporationBy:
    
    /s/  Ken-ichiro NakaiName:
    
    Ken-ichiro NakaiDate:  July 30, 2004
    Title:
    
    Director, General Manager of Administration Headquarters
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,755,474
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,247,338
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       5,141,254
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         5,213,331
<LOANS>                                     66,048,850
<ALLOWANCE>                                    643,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,863,209
<DEPOSITS>                                  60,404,057
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            876,781
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,020,000
<COMMON>                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,062,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              79,863,209
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,474,734
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               89,632
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                30,493
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,594,859
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             594,357
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             805,969
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          788,890
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   50,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                605,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                171,949
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     171,949
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   104,149
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.60
<LOANS-NON>                                     87,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    14,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                20,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                573,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               604,405
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (10,705)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              643,700
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           643,700
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
                  

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,241
<SECURITIES>                                     2,175
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                       181
<INVENTORY>                                        369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,358
<PP&E>                                           4,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,348
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,527
<BONDS>                                            344
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,247
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,324)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,802
<SALES>                                         14,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,296
<CGS>                                            4,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    48
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    575
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6403 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6403

 To immediately rescind all unobligated discretionary stimulus funds, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2010

   Mr. Lewis of California introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the 
   Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and Oversight and 
 Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To immediately rescind all unobligated discretionary stimulus funds, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Recovery and Reinvestment 
Rescissions Act''.

SEC. 2. IMMEDIATE RESCISSION OF ALL UNOBLIGATED DISCRETIONARY STIMULUS 
              FUNDS.

    There are hereby rescinded all unobligated balances remaining 
available as of November 15, 2010, of the discretionary appropriations 
provided by division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 
2009 (Public Law 111-5).

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF STIMULUS FUNDS FOR SELF-CONGRATULATORY 
              SIGNAGE.

    Hereafter, no Federal agency administering funds provided by 
division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
(Public Law 111-5) may provide funding or reimbursement to any entity 
awarded funds from such Act for the cost associated with physical 
signage or other advertisement indicating that a project is funded by 
such Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications




The
      undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shandong Zhouyuan
      Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd., and will be retained by Shandong
      Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.


April
                    15, 2008
                
                
                /s/
                    Wang ZhigangWang
                      Zhigang (Chief Executive
                      Officer)
 April
                  15, 2008
              
              
              /s/
                    Zhang ChunmanZhang
                      Chunman (Chief Financial
                      Officer)
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.01

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF COMSHARE, INCORPORATED

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiaries of the                               Incorporated
 Registrant (a)                                        In
-------------------                               ------------
<S>                                          <C>
Comshare (U.S.), Inc.                             Michigan
Comshare South Pacific Pty Ltd.                   Australia
Comshare, Ltd.                                    Canada
Comshare International B.V.                       Netherlands
 Comshare Holdings Company                        United Kingdom
  Comshare, Ltd.                                  United Kingdom
  Comshare, GmbH                                  Germany
  Comshare S.A.                                   France
  Comshare International Ltd.                     United Kingdom
CS Iberia sl                                  (b) Spain
CS srl                                        (b) Italy
CSI International Holdings, Inc.              (b) Delaware
CS Holdings, Inc.                             (b) Delaware
</TABLE>

----------------------

(a) All subsidiaries are wholly owned by their immediate parent.
(b) Subsidiaries have been dissolved as of June 30, 1998.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






For
      purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony Principe, the chief
      financial officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge:




(i)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ ANTHONY
              PRINCIPEAnthony
              Principe*Chief Financial Officer**On2 Technologies,
              Inc.*


Date:
      November 14, 2007




-37-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6206 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6206

        To reinstate funds to the Federal Land Disposal Account.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2010

  Mr. Heinrich (for himself and Mrs. Lummis) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To reinstate funds to the Federal Land Disposal Account.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL LAND DISPOSAL ACCOUNT.

    Notwithstanding section 206(f) of the Federal Land Transaction 
Facilitation Act (43 U.S.C. 2305(f)), any balance remaining in the 
Federal Land Disposal Account on July 24, 2010, shall be reinstated and 
available for expenditure in accordance with section 206(b) of that Act 
(43 U.S.C. 2305(b)), to remain available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
#### MERWIN, Respondent, v. NEWTON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

April 13, 1894.)

Action by Charles B. Merwin against John H. Newton. W, B. Crisp, for appellant. E." Stone, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Seabrooke, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), rendered November 6, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), and grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified (1) on the law, by reversing the conviction of robbery in the first degree under the first count of the indictment, as amended, and grand larceny in the third degree under the sixth count of the indictment, as amended, vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges to another Grand Jury *(see, People v Beslanovics,*57 *761NY2d 726), and (2) as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reversing the conviction of grand larceny in the third degree under the fifth count of the indictment, vacating the sentence imposed thereon and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the defendant’s contention that the first and sixth counts of the indictment, as amended, which charged the defendant with robbery in the first degree in that, acting in concert with several codefendants, he "forcibly stole certain property, namely, a bicycle from Anthony Toro, and jewelry from Timothy McGinnis” and grand larceny in the third degree in that he stole a bicycle from the person of Anthony Toro and jewelry from the person of Timothy McGinnis, must be dismissed because they each charge him with two offenses *(see,*CPL 200.30 [1]; *People v Kiendl,*68 NY2d 410, 417-418; *People v Branch,*73 AD2d 230, 234). That dismissal is, however, without prejudice to the People’s re-presentment of any appropriate charges to another Grand Jury *(see, People v Beauchamp,*74 NY2d 639).

Moreover, as the People concede, the fifth count of the indictment, under which the defendant was convicted of grand larceny in the third degree, must also be dismissed. That count is an inclusory concurrent count of the second count of the indictment, under which the defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree. Thus, the verdict of guilty under the second count is deemed a dismissal of the fifth count of the indictment (CPL 300.40 [3] [b]; *People v Johnson,*39 NY2d 364, 370).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions, including his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive, and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-651-000]

Take notice that on March 20, 2001, Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), an amendment to its formula rate contract between SWEPCO and Louisiana Generating, LLC (LaGen) and revised rate sheets to the formula rate contract between SWEPCO and the City of Bentonville, Arkansas (Bentonville)

SWEPCO is requesting that the Commission accept the LaGen Contract and the Bentonville Rate sheets for filing effective January 1, 2001.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at                     *http://www/​ferc/​fed/​us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

Linwod A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10386  Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M