# CE2010184EN.01017401.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/174 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/174

---

Wednesday 22 April 2009Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network *

P6_TA(2009)0227

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 April 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on a Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN) (COM(2008)0676 – C6-0399/2008 – 2008/0200(CNS))

2010/C 184 E/41

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2008)0676),

having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty and Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0399/2008),

having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis,

having regard to Rules 51 and 35 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0228/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;

| 3. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

| 5. | Calls on the Commission, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, if the Council has not taken any decision in this respect, to consider the possibility of using Article 196 (Civil Protection) as the legal basis for this proposal and to reconsider, if appropriate, submitting a proposal to Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

5.

Calls on the Commission, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, if the Council has not taken any decision in this respect, to consider the possibility of using Article 196 (Civil Protection) as the legal basis for this proposal and to reconsider, if appropriate, submitting a proposal to Parliament;

| 6. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

| TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION | AMENDMENT |
| --- | --- |
| Amendment 1 |
| Proposal for a decision


  Recital 1 |
| (1) | The Council conclusions on ‘Prevention, Preparedness and Response to Terrorist Attacks’ and the ‘EU Solidarity Programme on the Consequences of Terrorist Threats and Attacks’ adopted by Council in December 2004 endorsed the Commission’s intention to propose a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection and agreed to the Commission setting up CIWIN (1). |

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION

AMENDMENT

Amendment 1

Amendment 1

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 1

Recital 1

(1)

The Council conclusions on ‘Prevention, Preparedness and Response to Terrorist Attacks’ and the ‘EU Solidarity Programme on the Consequences of Terrorist Threats and Attacks’ adopted by Council in December 2004 endorsed the Commission’s intention to propose a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection and agreed to the Commission setting up CIWIN (1).

1

| (1) | The Council conclusions on ‘Prevention, Preparedness and Response to Terrorist Attacks’ and the ‘EU Solidarity Programme on the Consequences of Terrorist Threats and Attacks’ adopted by Council in December 2004 endorsed the Commission’s intention to propose a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection and agreed to the Commission setting up CIWIN (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Council conclusions on ‘Prevention, Preparedness and Response to Terrorist Attacks’ and the ‘EU Solidarity Programme on the Consequences of Terrorist Threats and Attacks’ adopted by Council in December 2004 endorsed the Commission’s intention to propose a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection and agreed to the Commission setting up CIWIN (2).

2

Amendment 2

Amendment 2

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 4

Recital 4

| (4) | Several incidents involving critical infrastructure in Europe such as for example the European blackout in 2006 demonstrated the need for a better and more efficient exchange of information in order to
  prevent or limit the scope of the incident
  . |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Several incidents involving critical infrastructure in Europe such as for example the European blackout in 2006 demonstrated the need for a better and more efficient exchange of information in order to
  prevent or limit the scope of the incident
  .

prevent or limit the scope of the incident

| (4) | Several incidents involving critical infrastructure in Europe such as for example the European blackout in 2006 demonstrated the need for a better and more efficient exchange of information
  and greater knowledge of the practice of different Member States
  in order to
  be prepared and to avoid a recurrence of such incidents
  . |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Several incidents involving critical infrastructure in Europe such as for example the European blackout in 2006 demonstrated the need for a better and more efficient exchange of information
  and greater knowledge of the practice of different Member States
  in order to
  be prepared and to avoid a recurrence of such incidents
  .

and greater knowledge of the practice of different Member States

be prepared and to avoid a recurrence of such incidents

Amendment 3

Amendment 3

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 5

Recital 5

| (5) | It is appropriate to establish an information system that will enable Member States and the Commission to exchange information
  and alerts
  in the field of
  Critical Infrastructure Protection (
  CIP
  )
  , to strengthen their CIP dialogue, and contribute towards promoting the integration and better coordination of nationally scattered and fragmented CIP research programmes. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

It is appropriate to establish an information system that will enable Member States and the Commission to exchange information
  and alerts
  in the field of
  Critical Infrastructure Protection (
  CIP
  )
  , to strengthen their CIP dialogue, and contribute towards promoting the integration and better coordination of nationally scattered and fragmented CIP research programmes.

and alerts

Critical Infrastructure Protection (

)

| (5) | It is
  therefore
  appropriate to establish an information system that will enable Member States and the Commission to exchange information in the field of CIP, to strengthen their CIP dialogue, and contribute towards promoting the integration and better coordination of nationally scattered and fragmented CIP research programmes. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

It is
  therefore
  appropriate to establish an information system that will enable Member States and the Commission to exchange information in the field of CIP, to strengthen their CIP dialogue, and contribute towards promoting the integration and better coordination of nationally scattered and fragmented CIP research programmes.

therefore

Amendment 4

Amendment 4

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 6

Recital 6

| (6) | CIWIN should contribute to the improvement of CIP in the EU by providing an information system that could facilitate Member States’ cooperation
  ;
  and offer an efficient and quick alternative to time-consuming methods of searching for information on critical infrastructures in the Community. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

CIWIN should contribute to the improvement of CIP in the EU by providing an information system that could facilitate Member States’ cooperation
  ;
  and offer an efficient and quick alternative to time-consuming methods of searching for information on critical infrastructures in the Community.

;

| (6) | CIWIN should contribute to the improvement of CIP in the EU by providing an information system that could facilitate Member States’ cooperation
  and coordination, and offer an efficient and quick alternative to time-consuming methods of searching for information on critical infrastructures in the Community.
  It should in particular stimulate the development of appropriate measures aimed at facilitating the exchange and dissemination of information, best practice and experience between Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

CIWIN should contribute to the improvement of CIP in the EU by providing an information system that could facilitate Member States’ cooperation
  and coordination, and offer an efficient and quick alternative to time-consuming methods of searching for information on critical infrastructures in the Community.
  It should in particular stimulate the development of appropriate measures aimed at facilitating the exchange and dissemination of information, best practice and experience between Member States.

and coordination

It should in particular stimulate the development of appropriate measures aimed at facilitating the exchange and dissemination of information, best practice and experience between Member States.

Amendment 5

Amendment 5

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 6 a (new)

Recital 6 a (new)

| (6a) | The first evaluation of CIWIN should also include an in-depth analysis of the necessity of adding a new functionality to CIWIN, namely the technical facility of a rapid alert system (RAS). This functionality should enable Member States and the Commission to post alerts on immediate risks and threats to critical infrastructure, taking into account all the necessary security requirements. |
| --- | --- |

(6a)

(6a)

The first evaluation of CIWIN should also include an in-depth analysis of the necessity of adding a new functionality to CIWIN, namely the technical facility of a rapid alert system (RAS). This functionality should enable Member States and the Commission to post alerts on immediate risks and threats to critical infrastructure, taking into account all the necessary security requirements.

The first evaluation of CIWIN should also include an in-depth analysis of the necessity of adding a new functionality to CIWIN, namely the technical facility of a rapid alert system (RAS). This functionality should enable Member States and the Commission to post alerts on immediate risks and threats to critical infrastructure, taking into account all the necessary security requirements.

Amendment 6

Amendment 6

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 7

Recital 7

| (7) | CIWIN should, in particular, stimulate the development of appropriate measures aimed at facilitating an exchange of best practices as well as being a vehicle for transmission of immediate threats and alerts in a secure manner. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

(7)

CIWIN should, in particular, stimulate the development of appropriate measures aimed at facilitating an exchange of best practices as well as being a vehicle for transmission of immediate threats and alerts in a secure manner.

CIWIN should, in particular, stimulate the development of appropriate measures aimed at facilitating an exchange of best practices as well as being a vehicle for transmission of immediate threats and alerts in a secure manner.

deleted

deleted

Amendment 7

Amendment 7

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 8

Recital 8

| (8) | CIWIN
  should avoid
  duplication and
  be
  heedful of the specific characteristics, expertise, arrangements and areas of competence of each of the existing sectoral rapid alert systems (RAS). |
| --- | --- |

(8)

CIWIN
  should avoid
  duplication and
  be
  heedful of the specific characteristics, expertise, arrangements and areas of competence of each of the existing sectoral rapid alert systems (RAS).

should avoid

be

| (8) | In the course of the development and evaluation of the new information system, Member States and the Commission should ensure that
  CIWIN
  avoids
  duplication and
  is
  heedful of the specific characteristics, expertise, arrangements and areas of competence of each of the existing sectoral rapid alert systems (RAS). |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In the course of the development and evaluation of the new information system, Member States and the Commission should ensure that
  CIWIN
  avoids
  duplication and
  is
  heedful of the specific characteristics, expertise, arrangements and areas of competence of each of the existing sectoral rapid alert systems (RAS).

In the course of the development and evaluation of the new information system, Member States and the Commission should ensure that

avoids

is

Amendment 8

Amendment 8

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 10

Recital 10

| (10) | The interdependence of critical infrastructure in Member States and varying levels of CIP in Member States suggest that creating a horizontal and cross-sectoral Community tool for the exchange of information
  and alerts
  on CIP would increase the security of citizens. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

(10)

The interdependence of critical infrastructure in Member States and varying levels of CIP in Member States suggest that creating a horizontal and cross-sectoral Community tool for the exchange of information
  and alerts
  on CIP would increase the security of citizens.

and alerts

| (4a) | The interdependence of critical infrastructure in Member States and varying levels of
  Critical Infrastructure Protection (
  CIP
  )
  in Member States suggest that creating a horizontal and cross-sectoral Community tool for the exchange of information on CIP would increase the security of citizens. |
| --- | --- |

(4a)

(4a)

The interdependence of critical infrastructure in Member States and varying levels of
  Critical Infrastructure Protection (
  CIP
  )
  in Member States suggest that creating a horizontal and cross-sectoral Community tool for the exchange of information on CIP would increase the security of citizens.

Critical Infrastructure Protection (

)

Amendment 9

Amendment 9

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 10 a (new)

Recital 10 a (new)

| (10a) | The adoption of measures in the sphere of civil protection is listed among the activities of Community in point (u) of Article 3(1) of the EC Treaty. Therefore, the creation of CIWIN is necessary to enable the Community to attain an objective laid down by the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(10a)

(10a)

The adoption of measures in the sphere of civil protection is listed among the activities of Community in point (u) of Article 3(1) of the EC Treaty. Therefore, the creation of CIWIN is necessary to enable the Community to attain an objective laid down by the Treaty.

The adoption of measures in the sphere of civil protection is listed among the activities of Community in point (u) of Article 3(1) of the EC Treaty. Therefore, the creation of CIWIN is necessary to enable the Community to attain an objective laid down by the Treaty.

Amendment 11

Amendment 11

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Recital 17

Recital 17

| (17) | This Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised
  in particular
  by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(17)

This Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised
  in particular
  by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

in particular

| (17) | This Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by
  Article 6 of the EU Treaty and reflected in
  the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(17)

This Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by
  Article 6 of the EU Treaty and reflected in
  the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

Article 6 of the EU Treaty and reflected in

Amendment 12

Amendment 12

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 1

Article 1

This Decision sets up a secure information
  ,
  communication
  and alert
  system - Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN) - with the aim of assisting Member States to exchange information on
  shared threats,
  vulnerabilities and appropriate measures and strategies to mitigate risks related to CIP.

,

and alert

shared threats,

This Decision sets up a secure information
  and
  communication system - Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN) - with the aim of assisting Member States to exchange information on vulnerabilities and appropriate measures and strategies to mitigate risks related to CIP.

and

Amendment 13

Amendment 13

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 2 – paragraph 2

Article 2 – paragraph 2

‘Critical Infrastructure’ shall mean those assets, systems or parts thereof located in Member States which are essential for the maintenance of vital societal functions, health, safety, security, economic or social well-being of people, and the disruption or destruction of which would have a significant impact in a Member State as a result of the failure to maintain those functions.

‘Critical Infrastructure’ shall mean those assets, systems or parts thereof located in Member States which are essential for the maintenance of vital societal functions, health, safety, security,
  supply chain,
  economic or social well-being of people, and the disruption or destruction of which would have a significant impact in a Member State as a result of the failure to maintain those functions.

supply chain,

Amendment 14

Amendment 14

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 2 – paragraph 3

Article 2 – paragraph 3

‘Participating Member State’ shall mean the Member State having signed a Memorandum of understanding with the Commission.

‘Participating Member State’ shall mean the Member State having signed a Memorandum of understanding with the Commission.

deleted

deleted

Amendment 15

Amendment 15

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 3

Article 3

Article 3

Article 3

Participation

Participation

Participation in and use of CIWIN is open to all Member States. The participation to CIWIN shall be conditional upon the signature of a Memorandum of understanding that contains technical and security requirements applicable to CIWIN, and information on the sites to be connected to CIWIN.

Participation in and use of CIWIN is open to all Member States. The participation to CIWIN shall be conditional upon the signature of a Memorandum of understanding that contains technical and security requirements applicable to CIWIN, and information on the sites to be connected to CIWIN.

deleted

deleted

Amendment 16

Amendment 16

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 4 – Title

Article 4 – Title

Functionalities

Functionalities

Functionality and structure

Functionality and structure

Amendment 17

Amendment 17

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 4 – paragraph 1

(1)   The CIWIN shall
  consist of the two following functionalities:

consist of the two following functionalities:

| (a) | an electronic forum for the CIP related to information exchange; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

(a)

an electronic forum for the CIP related to information exchange;

| (b) | a rapid alert functionality that shall enable participating Member States and the Commission to post alerts on immediate risks and threats to critical infrastructure. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

(b)

a rapid alert functionality that shall enable participating Member States and the Commission to post alerts on immediate risks and threats to critical infrastructure.

a rapid alert functionality that shall enable participating Member States and the Commission to post alerts on immediate risks and threats to critical infrastructure.

(1)   The CIWIN shall
  be designed as
  an electronic forum for the CIP related to information exchange.

be designed as

Amendment 18

Amendment 18

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)

(1a)
     
  The technical platform for CIWIN shall be present in at least one secure location in each Member State.

(1a)

The technical platform for CIWIN shall be present in at least one secure location in each Member State.

Amendment 19

Amendment 19

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Fixed areas shall be included in the system on a permanent basis. While their content may be adjusted, the areas may not be removed
  ,
  renamed
  or new areas added
  . Annex I contains a list of fixed areas.

,

or new areas added

Fixed areas shall be included in the system on a permanent basis. While their content may be adjusted, the areas may not be removed
  and
  renamed. Annex I contains a list of fixed areas.
  This does not preclude the inclusion of new areas if the functioning of the system demonstrates that it is necessary.

and

This does not preclude the inclusion of new areas if the functioning of the system demonstrates that it is necessary.

Amendment 20

Amendment 20

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 5 – paragraph 1

Article 5 – paragraph 1

(1)   
  Participating
  Member States shall designate a CIWIN Executive and notify the Commission thereof. CIWIN Executive shall be responsible for granting or denying access rights to the CIWIN within the relevant Member State.

Participating

(1)   Member States shall designate a CIWIN Executive and notify the Commission thereof. CIWIN Executive shall be responsible for granting or denying access rights to the CIWIN within the relevant Member State.

(This amendment applies throughout the text.)

(This amendment applies throughout the text.)

Amendment 21

Amendment 21

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 5 – paragraph 2

Article 5 – paragraph 2

(2)   
  Participating
  Member States shall provide access to the CIWIN in compliance with the guidelines adopted by the Commission.

Participating

(2)   Member States shall provide access to the CIWIN in compliance with the
  user
  guidelines adopted by the Commission.

user

Amendment 22

Amendment 22

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b

| (b) | laying down guidelines on the terms of use of the system, including confidentiality, transmission, storage, filing and deletion of information. The Commission shall also establish the terms and procedures for granting full or selective access to the CIWIN. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

laying down guidelines on the terms of use of the system, including confidentiality, transmission, storage, filing and deletion of information. The Commission shall also establish the terms and procedures for granting full or selective access to the CIWIN.

| (b) | laying down
  user
  guidelines on the terms of use of the system, including confidentiality, transmission, storage, filing and deletion of information. The Commission shall also establish the terms and procedures for granting full or selective access to the CIWIN. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

laying down
  user
  guidelines on the terms of use of the system, including confidentiality, transmission, storage, filing and deletion of information. The Commission shall also establish the terms and procedures for granting full or selective access to the CIWIN.

user

Amendment 23

Amendment 23

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)

(3a)
     
  The Commission shall monitor the functioning of the CIWIN system.

(3a)

The Commission shall monitor the functioning of the CIWIN system.

Amendment 24

Amendment 24

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 7 – paragraph 2

Article 7 – paragraph 2

(2)   Users’ rights to access documents shall be on a ‘need to know’ basis
  and must
  at all times respect the author’s specific instructions on the protection and distribution of a document.

and must

(2)   Users’ rights to access documents shall be on a ‘need to know’ basis
  . Users shall
  at all times respect the author’s specific instructions on the protection and distribution of a document.

. Users shall

Amendment 25

Amendment 25

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)

(2a)
     
  In Member States, the exchange of sensitive information uploaded onto CIWIN between authorised users and third parties shall be subject to the prior authorisation of the owner of that information and shall take place in accordance with relevant Community and national law.

(2a)

In Member States, the exchange of sensitive information uploaded onto CIWIN between authorised users and third parties shall be subject to the prior authorisation of the owner of that information and shall take place in accordance with relevant Community and national law.

Amendment 26

Amendment 26

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 7 a (new)

Article 7 a (new)

Article 7a

Article 7a

Requirements relating to information included in CIWIN

Requirements relating to information included in CIWIN

For any information or documents uploaded in the system an automatic translation will be possible.

For any information or documents uploaded in the system an automatic translation will be possible.

The Commission shall, in collaboration with CIP contact points, develop a list of key words for each sector which could be used when uploading or searching for information in CIWIN.

The Commission shall, in collaboration with CIP contact points, develop a list of key words for each sector which could be used when uploading or searching for information in CIWIN.

Amendment 27

Amendment 27

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 8

Article 8

The Commission shall develop and regularly update User guidelines containing full details of CIWIN’s
  functionalities
  and roles.

functionalities

The Commission shall develop and regularly update
  the
  User guidelines containing full details of CIWIN’s
  functionality
  and roles.

the

functionality

Amendment 28

Amendment 28

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)

The User Guidelines shall be established in accordance with the advisory procedure laid down in Article 3 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (3).

The User Guidelines shall be established in accordance with the advisory procedure laid down in Article 3 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (3

Amendment 29

Amendment 29

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 10 – paragraph 1

Article 10 – paragraph 1

The Commission shall review and evaluate the operation of the CIWIN every three years, and shall submit regular reports to
  the
  Member States.

the

The Commission
  , using specially developed indicators for monitoring progress,
  shall review and evaluate the operation of the CIWIN every three years, and shall submit regular reports to
  all
  Member States
  , the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee
  .

, using specially developed indicators for monitoring progress,

all

, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee

Amendment 30

Amendment 30

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 10 – paragraph 2

Article 10 – paragraph 2

The first report, which shall be submitted within three years after the entry into force of this Decision, shall, in particular, identify those elements of the Community network which should be improved or adapted. It shall also include any proposal that the Commission considers necessary for the amendment or adaptation of this Decision.

The first report, which shall be submitted within three years after the entry into force of this Decision, shall, in particular, identify those elements of the Community network which should be improved or adapted
  and shall, in particular, assess the participation of each Member State in the CIWIN system as well as the possibility of upgrading CIWIN to include a rapid alert system (RAS) functionality
  . It shall also include any proposal that the Commission considers necessary for the amendment or adaptation of this Decision.

and shall, in particular, assess the participation of each Member State in the CIWIN system as well as the possibility of upgrading CIWIN to include a rapid alert system (RAS) functionality

Amendment 31

Amendment 31

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 11

Article 11

This Decision shall
  apply as from 1 January 2009
  .

apply as from 1 January 2009

This Decision shall
  take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union
  .

take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union

Amendment 32

Amendment 32

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Annex II – point 3

Annex II – point 3

| (3) | Alert Areas, which may be created in the event of an alert being triggered in the RAS, and will constitute the channel of communication during CIP-related activities; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

(3)

Alert Areas, which may be created in the event of an alert being triggered in the RAS, and will constitute the channel of communication during CIP-related activities;

Alert Areas, which may be created in the event of an alert being triggered in the RAS, and will constitute the channel of communication during CIP-related activities;

deleted

deleted

---

(1)  
  14894/04.

1

14894/04.

(2)  
  Council Document 15232/04.

2

Council Document 15232/04.

(3)  

  OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

3

OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

---