alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

# DATE AND TIME:

Friday, May 4, 2001, 9:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

# STATUS:

 

### Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Approval of Minutes of April 13, 2001 Meeting

III. Announcements

IV. Staff Director's Report

V. State Advisory Committee Report
      - Race Relations and Des Moines' New Immigrants (Iowa)
      - Equal Educational Opportunity for Native American Students in Montana Public Schools (Montana)

                    VI. Future Agenda Items                          ( print page 21310)    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

David Aronson, Press and Communications (202) 376-8312.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr., 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-10753 Filed 4-25-01; 4:57 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford K. Bown, certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended
on June 30, 2012, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Clifford K. Bown                                
|                                                    
|Clifford K. Bown                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 3, 2012                                      



39
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

The Electronics Targets Panel Meeting will meet in Washington, DC on May 8-10, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and discuss the direction of the study. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 552b(c) of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and (4) thereof. 

For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404. 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-10879 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
NUMBER 13-17-00596-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RAMON JOEL PENA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 347th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was originally due on March 7, 2018. On May 14, 2018, this 

Court granted appellant’s second motion for extension of time and directed appellant to 

file the brief on or before June 7, 2018. Counsel failed to file a brief and on July 26, 

2018, this Court abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court for further 
2

proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. On December 18, 2018, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as 

counsel on grounds counsel is overwhelmed with work and has been unable to complete 

the brief.

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel 

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the 

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with 

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of 

this issue. 

Accordingly, the appeal remains abated and the trial court is directed to 

determine whether appellant’s court-appointed attorney should remain as appellant's 

counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial 

court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant’s current appointed 

attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order to that effect. If 

the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, address, email 

address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be 

included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to 

be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or 

before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
3

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

3rd day of January, 2019.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

              CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Properties, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald P.
Chrzanowski, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                     /s/ Ronald P. Chrzanowski
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Ronald P. Chrzanowski
                                     President and Principal Executive Officer
                                     March 11, 2003
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 02-16

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired judges of the Court may be recalled by

the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William A. Moorman,

having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired judge. The Chief

Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Moorman would provide substantial

service necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective February 1, 2016, recall-eligible retired Judge William A.

Moorman is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). Judge Moorman

shall have and exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active service

and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. It is

further

ORDERED that Judge Moorman shall serve in recalled status in this calendar year to review

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court, and to perform other substantial

service at the request of the Chief Judge, and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up

to 90 days or its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Moorman's service may be extended beyond

90 days. 

DATED: February 1, 2016 BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence B. Hagel

LAWRENCE B. HAGEL

Chief Judge
#### INDERLAND, Respondent, v. GRAY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Edward O. inderland against William S. Gray.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to answer within 20 days upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and the appeal.
Exhibit 10 (h)

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
               KNIGHT-RIDDER, INC. ANNUAL INCENTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN


            This First Amendment to the Knight-Ridder, Inc. Annual Incentive
Deferral Plan (the "Plan") is adopted by Knight-Ridder, Inc. (the "Employer")
effective as provided herein.

            WHEREAS, the Employer adopted the Plan effective November 1, 1996 as
an unfunded deferred compensation plan maintained primarily to provide deferred
compensation for eligible Participants, all of whom are members of a select
group of management or highly compensated employees of the Employer; and

            WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan concerning the
installment payments provided under the Plan; and

            WHEREAS, Section 13 of the Plan permits amendment of the Plan by the
Employer.

            NOW, THEREFORE, this First Amendment is executed effective with
respect to elections made on or after May 15, 1998 to receive installment
payments under the Plan:

            Section 6(c) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

                  (c) Election of Installment Payments. Notwithstanding the
            foregoing, a Participant may elect to receive distribution of all,
            but not less than all, of his or her Deferral Accounts in up to five
            substantially equal annual installments, with the first payment to
            be made on the Distribution Date provided under subsection 6(a),
            above, with the remaining annual installments to be made as near as
            possible to the same date in each subsequent year until complete
            distribution of the Participant's Deferral Account. An election for
            distribution to occur in installments must be made in the form and
            manner provided by the Plan Administrator and at least six months
            before the Distribution Date that otherwise would apply under
            subsection 6(a). A Participant's election to receive installment
            payments may be changed only if the revised election is made at
            least six months before the Distribution Date that otherwise would
            apply under subsection 6(a).

            KNIGHT-RIDDER, INC. has caused this First Amendment to the
Knight-Ridder, Inc. Annual Incentive Deferral Plan, to be executed effective as
provided above.


                                        KNIGHT-RIDDER, INC.


                                        By:

                                        Name and Title:
The Hon. Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge of the United States Court of International Trade,

*

sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 08a0775n.06

Filed: December 22, 2008

No. 07-1600

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

PATRICIA AUSTIN

Plaintiff,

DENNIS MCLAIN, as personal representative of the

Estate of Anthony Gilhouse

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SECURECARE, INCORPORATED; KATHY

HEBERT-LAGINESS, R.N.; ANNE LATULIPGARIEPY; DARYL TYRONE PARKER, M.D.;

JAMES GARRETT

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BEFORE: Daughtrey, Rogers, Circuit Judges, and Restani, Judge. *

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Dennis McLain, on behalf of the Estate of Anthony

Gilhouse, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants SecureCare,

Inc., Daryl Tyrone Parker, M.D., James Garrett, R.N., Anne Latulip-Gariepy, L.P.N., and Kathy

Hebert-Laginess, R.N. Plaintiff brought this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations
No. 07-1600

Austin v. Secure Care, Inc., et al.

- 2 -

of Gilhouse’s Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Plaintiff claims that defendants’ deliberate

indifference to Gilhouse’s serious medical needs resulted in Gilhouse’s death from an asthma attack.

After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, and hearing oral argument, this

court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirms the

district court’s decision for the reasons stated in Judge Edmunds’ April 24, 2007, opinion and order.

The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of all remaining defendants. The

judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
# Official Journal L 176/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.176.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 176 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5627 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.176.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 176

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5627 June 2013

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (1) | 1 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (1) | 338 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (1)

1

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (1)

338

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 24








POWER OF ATTORNEY





KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Richard N. Marshall and Robert M. Kerrigan, III, or either of them, acting individually or together, as such person's true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s), with full power of
substitution and revocation, to act in any capacity for such person and in such person's name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Rerport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Southern Union Company, a Delaware corporation, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange.





Dated:   March 1, 2010








/s/ George L. Lindemann                                                     /s/
Eric D. Herschmann


George L. Lindemann                                                                                    
Eric D. Herschmann








/s/ Michal Barzuza                                                     /s/
Herbert H. Jacobi


Michal Barzuza                                                                                                                                                                                   Herbert
H. Jacobi








/s/ David Brodsky                                                                                                                                     /s/
Thomas N. McCarter, III


David Brodsky                                                                                                                                                                                   Thomas
N. McCarter, III








/s/ Frank W. Denius                                                                                                                          /s/
George Rountree, III


Frank W. Denius                                                                                                                                                      George
Rountree, III








/s/ Kurt A. Gitter, M.D.                                                                                                                                     /s/
Allan D. Scherer


Kurt A. Gitter, M.D.                                                                                                                                                                           Allan
D. Scherer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(1)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark C. Vonnahme, Chief Executive Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Mark C. Vonnahme

Mark C. Vonnahme
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned certifies that
(1) this Quarterly Report of W. R. Grace & Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/A. E. FESTA Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/HUDSON LA FORCE III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 8, 2008


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks