alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (Registration No. 333-35539, No. 333-83842, and No.
333-126981) of Checkpoint Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2007
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2007
February 19, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ARELYS RODRIGUEZ , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00119

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order app ellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BINPO v. HOAG, County Treasurer.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

July 27, 1894.)

Proceeding on the relation of Peter Binpo against John Hoag, County Treasurer.

No opinion. Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 798 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 798

                  For the relief of Adrian Rodriguez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2009

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Adrian Rodriguez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF ADRIAN RODRIGUEZ.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds 
not otherwise appropriated, an appropriate amount to compensate Adrian 
Rodriguez for costs related to and damages arising from his arrest, 
prosecution, and incarceration in Mexico in 2003 as described in Claim 
No. 05-370C filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims.
    (b) Satisfaction of Claims.--The payment under subsection (a) shall 
be in full satisfaction of all claims of Adrian Rodriguez against the 
United States in connection with the matter described in such 
subsection.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' AND AGENTS' FEES.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 
percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to, or 
received by, any agent or attorney for any service rendered in 
connection with the payment under this Act.
    (b) Enforcement.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
guilty of an infraction and shall be fined under title 18, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Missouri Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10 a.m. and adjourn at 1 p.m. on May 8, 2001, at the Embassy Suites, 901 North First Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63131. The purpose of the meeting is to plan future activities and receive civil rights monitoring issues from Committee members.

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Dated at Washington, DC, April 17, 2001.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-10275 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
EXHIBIT 23

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-11021 on Form S-3 dated  December 22, 1986,  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-28010 on Form S-3 dated April 7, 1989, in Registration Statement No. 33-31747
on Form S-8 dated October 30, 1989, in  Registration  Statement No.  33-69206 on
Form S-8 dated May 18, 1993, in Registration Statement No. 333-37603 on Form S-3
dated October 9, 1997 of Knight-Ridder, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, of
our report dated January 26, 1998,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements and schedule of  Knight-Ridder,  Inc.  incorporated  by reference and
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 1997.



                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                           ---------------------

Miami, Florida
March 13, 1998
EXHIBIT 99.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and  Investor
Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Gerald D. Brasuell, the
President of OpticNet,  Inc. (the "Company")  hereby certifies that, to the best
of his knowledge:

     1.   The  Company's  Annual  Report on Form  10-K/A  for the  period  ended
          September 28, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
          99.3 (the "Annual  Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of
          Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition of the Company at the end
          of the period  covered by the Annual  Report and results of operations
          of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.


Dated: 1/24/03

/s/ Gerald D. Brasuell
-------------------------------
Gerald D. Brasuell
President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,243]

                    By letter of February 4, 2001, a petition requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance applicable to workers of the subject firm. The negative determination was signed on January 12, 2001, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 8, 2001 (66 FR 9599).                

The Department's review of the application shows that the information provided supports additional survey of the subject firm customers.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of April 2001.

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-11106  Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and is available for licensing by the Department of the Navy. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/363,819 entitled “Molecularly-Imprinted Material Made By Template-Directed Synthesis,” Navy Case No. 79,430. 

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patent application cited should be directed to the Naval Research Laboratory, Code 1008.2, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-5320, and must include the Navy Case number. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Catherine M. Cotell, PhD., Head, Technology Transfer Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-5320, telephone (202) 767-7230. 

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404) 

Dated: April 23, 2001.

J.L. Roth, 

*Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.*

[FR Doc. 01-10881 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Craig A. Knock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                                                                                                       
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 26, 2010 |  | /s/    CRAIG A.
KNOCK                                                                                                                                 
|                        |  | Craig A. Knock Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.
##### In this section

              - eNFIRS Applications
              - Documentation
              - Training
              - Coding Help                 - Basic Module (19)
                - Coding (19)
                - Data Analysis (3)
                - Data Quality (9)
                - Other Modules (10)
              - Reporting Guidelines
              - Vendor Information
              - Data Quality
              - Access Data
              - About NFIRS
              - NERIS

Nov. 29, 2023

### How to document wildfires

Coding, Data Quality, Other Modules

----

It is important to document wildfires in NFIRS completely and accurately to better understand the impacts they have in our country. Tips on how to code wildfires.

Nov. 29, 2023

### How to code fire incidents involving lithium-ion batteries

Basic Module, Coding, Data Quality, Other Modules

----

Learn how to code a NFIRS report for a fire incident in a vehicle, structure or equipment where a lithium-ion battery is present and involved.

June 21, 2023

### 3 reasons why the NFIRS is important

Data Quality, Data Analysis

----

3 reasons why it's important for your fire department to use NFIRS.

June 19, 2023

### Dispatched and canceled en route

Basic Module, Coding, Data Quality

----

Learn how to correctly use the 'Incident Type Code 611 — Dispatched and canceled en route' when writing an NFIRS report.

June 19, 2023

### Aid given or received

Coding, Basic Module, Data Quality

----

Learn how correctly use the 'Aid Given' or 'Received field (Block D)' in the Basic Module when submitting an NFIRS report.

Dec. 17, 2020

### Why getting the incident type right matters

Basic Module, Data Quality

----

Understand why getting the incident type field right matters.

Dec. 17, 2020Updated: Oct. 25, 2023
UPDATED

### Data quality

Basic Module, Data Quality

----

Learn how internal data quality checks are performed by the National Fire Data Center to identify data errors and to assist in fixing them.

Dec. 17, 2020

### Understanding the 20-minute response warning message

Basic Module, Data Quality

----

Understanding the 20-minute response warning message.

June 6, 2020

### Formatting your incident numbers

Basic Module, Coding, Data Quality

----

Options for coding dates into your NFIRS incident numbers.
#### John Williams, Jr., Appellant, v Swissotel New York, *458Inc., et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (John Dier, J.), entered on June 8, 1988, which dismissed plaintiff-appellant’s complaint at trial for failure to prove a prima facie case, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion to dismiss is denied, the complaint is reinstated, and the matter is remanded for a new trial, with costs to abide the event.

Plaintiff-appellant John Williams alleges that he was injured when an elevator at the Drake Hotel fell nine stories and abruptly stopped just below the lobby floor landing, throwing him to the floor and against the wall. Hospital records from the date of the alleged occurrence indicate that he suffered a ruptured spleen and five broken ribs.

At trial, appellant testified to his version of how the elevator fell and how his injuries occurred. Plaintiff also called Mr. Lawrence Betz, an officer of defendant-respondent P.S. Elevator, Inc., which serviced the elevator under contract, who testified as an expert witness. Mr. Betz testified that it was physically impossible for the accident to have occurred as related by plaintiff in light of the existence of safety features and findings of an inspection conducted after the accident that revealed an absence of telltale markings on the elevator cable that would have been present had such an accident occurred.

At trial, appellant’s attorney requested that the court issue an order precluding examination of appellant’s proposed expert witness, Mr. Joseph Ferranti, about a case in which Mr. Ferranti had testified as a witness and in which he had also testified before a Grand Jury. When the court declined to issue such an order of preclusion, Mr. Ferranti ran from the courtroom and was unavailable and unwilling to testify as plaintiff’s expert witness.

Appellant’s counsel requested a continuance to obtain another expert witness, but the court denied the application and dismissed the complaint for failure to prove a prima facie case, despite appellant’s stated intention to rest and rely upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. The court stated, "[tjhere is no evidence in the record, whatsoever, about this elevator falling, and that is the whole theory here, upon which you want me to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.”

We believe that the testimony of appellant as to how the elevator fell is sufficient evidence, if found credible by the trier of fact, to support the application of the doctrine. If the occurrence as related is believed, it alone is sufficient to support an inference of both negligence and causation. *(See,*
      *459
      *Burgess v Otis Elevator Co.,*114 AD2d 784, 787, *affd*69 NY2d 623.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 771 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 

waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits following the divorce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2009 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the two-year waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits 

following the divorce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TWO-YEAR WAITING PERIOD 

4 FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE’S BENEFITS FOL5 LOWING THE DIVORCE IN CASES OF PRIOR 

6 RECEIPT OF SPOUSE’S BENEFITS. 

7 (a) WIFE’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

8 202(b)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 402(b)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘divorced wife—’’ 

10 and all that follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and insertVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:06 Jan 31, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H771.IH H771

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 771 IH

1 ing ‘‘divorced wife meets the requirements of subpara2 graphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be enti3 tled’’. 

4 (b) HUSBAND’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

5 202(c)(4)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(c)(4)(A)) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘divorced husband—’’ and all that 

7 follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and inserting ‘‘divorced 

8 husband meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 

9 through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled’’. 

10 (c) EXEMPTION FROM DEDUCTIONS ON ACCOUNT OF

11 WORK.—Section 203(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 403(b)(2)) is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘(2)(A) Except as’’ and all that 

14 follows through ‘‘the benefit to which’’ and inserting 

15 the following: ‘‘(2) In any case in which any of the 

16 other persons referred to in paragraph (1)(B) is en17 titled to monthly benefits as a divorced spouse under 

18 subsection (b) or (c) of section 202 for any month, 

19 the benefit to which’’; and 

20 (2) by striking subparagraph (B). 

21 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

22 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with 

23 respect to benefits for months after the date of the enact24 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### *In re*PAUL, Robert Harold

(MR 21695)

Mishicot, WI

*698Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Robert Harold Paul, who has been disciplined in the State of Wisconsin, is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days in the State of Illinois. Suspension effective October 9, 2007. Respondent Robert Harold Paul shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6188 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6188

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements in 
  the laws relating to default procedures for loans guaranteed by the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2010

 Mr. Walz (for himself and Mr. Boozman) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements in 
  the laws relating to default procedures for loans guaranteed by the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Homelessness Prevention 
and Early Warning Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NOTICE AND RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS 
              FOR DEFAULTS IN PAYMENTS OF LOANS GUARANTEED BY THE 
              DEPARTMENT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of subsection (a) of section 
3732(a)(4)(A) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting after 
        ``this subsection'' the following: ``and in no case later than 
        seven business days after receiving such notice''; and
            (2) insert after clause (ii) the following new clauses:
            ``(iii) notify a homelessness case manager of the 
        Department of the default; and
            ``(iv) ensure that the case manager develops a plan to 
        provide alternate housing for the veteran in the event that the 
        veteran loses the veteran's home.''; and
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than six months after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
submit to Congress a report on the Secretary's plan for carrying out 
subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subsection (a) of section 3732 of 
title 38, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```