alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 

MetroPCS Communications, Inc. 

MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. 

MPCS Holdco Merger Sub, Inc. 

MetroPCS California/Florida, Inc. 

MetroPCS Chico, Inc. 

MetroPCS Georgia, Inc. 

GWI PCS1, Inc. 

GWI PCS2, Inc. 

GWI PCS3, Inc. 

GWI PCS4, Inc.

GWI PCS5, Inc. 

GWI PCS6, Inc. 

GWI PCS7, Inc. 

GWI PCS8, Inc. 

GWI PCS9, Inc. 

GWI PCS10, Inc. 

GWI PCS11, Inc. 

GWI PCS12, Inc. 

GWI PCS13, Inc. 

GWI PCS14, Inc. 

Reauction, Inc. 

PCS81, LLC
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of IMCO Recycling Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don V. Ingram, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  | IMCO RECYCLING INC.
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------
|                     
|Date:  March 25, 2003 |  |  |  | By:                
|                      |  |  |  |                    
|                      |  |  |  |
EXHIBIT 99.1

                             COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

           To:       The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Indenture Trustee

           This Compliance Certificate is furnished pursuant to Section 2.12 of
the 2000-A Servicing Supplement to the Basic Servicing Agreement dated as of
November 1, 2000 among Financial Services Vehicle Trust, BMW Manufacturing LP
and BMWFS, as Servicer (the "Servicing Supplement", and together with the Basic
Servicing Agreement, the "Servicing Agreement") (all capitalized terms used
herein without definition have the respective meanings specified in the
Servicing Agreement)

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:

1.         I am a duly authorized officer of the Servicer;

2.         I have reviewed the terms of the Servicing Agreement and I have made,
           or have caused to be made under my supervision, a detailed review of
           the transactions and conditions of the Servicer and the performance
           of its obligations thereunder during the period from November 9, 2000
           to December 31, 2000;

3.         The examinations described in paragraph 2 did not disclose, and I
           have no knowledge of, the existence of any condition or event which
           constitutes a Servicer Default or Potential Servicer Default, as each
           such term is defined under the Servicing Agreement, during the period
           from November 9, 2000 to December 31, 2000, except as set forth
           below.

           Described below are the exceptions, if any, to paragraph 3 by
listing, in detail, the nature of the condition or event, the period during
which it has existed and the action which the Servicer has taken, is taking, or
proposes to take with respect to each such condition or event:


           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereunto set my hand this 22nd day
of March 2001.

By:    BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

By:    /s/ John Christman
       ------------------------------
       John Christman

Title: CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          17,229
<SECURITIES>                                     4,969
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                       437
<INVENTORY>                                      1,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,523
<PP&E>                                           6,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,366
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,911
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,653
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    27
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,409
<INCOME-TAX>                                       543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                866
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Walter Alexander COREA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-20569

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Kelly W. Case, Case Law, The Woodlands, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Walter Alexander Corea has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Corea has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Corea’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Work Smarter

Use transfer belts, carryalls and similar lifting devices correctly.

Photos courtesy of Phoenix Fire Department.

Follow these tips to improve your safety and fitness on the job.

Reduce your risk of injury while lifting, bending and carrying. The following devices, used correctly, will help you 

lift safely and avoid injury.

Transfer belts and similar lifting devices 

ĵ Can be used to assist with all lifting and transferring of patients.

ĵ Quick to don, inexpensive and allow for multiple people to assist with the lift in a tight space or allow for greater 

leverage if a one-person lift is required. 

ĵ Provide an increased sense of security to the patient, decreasing the risk of a patient clinging or grabbing on to 

responders. 

ĵ Make sure the belt is tight around the patient to prevent slipping. 

ĵ Can be used in most lifts, such as from chair to chair, from floor to chair and while walking. 

Carryalls and similar lifting devices 

ĵ Roll a carryall under a patient to allow a greater number of responders to assist with the lift.

ĵ Use eye contact and verbal communication with lifting partners.

ĵ Use these body mechanic techniques when multiple responders need to get through a narrow passage. 

Ý When four responders are moving a patient though a narrow space like a doorway, if the ground is flat, 

consider lowering the patient to the ground and pulling them through the narrow space rather than having 

all four responders try to awkwardly maneuver through the space simultaneously. 

Ý Once the area widens, all four emergency responders can then resume the lift and carry using proper body 

mechanics. The benefits of proper body mechanics can outweigh manpower.

Download or order your free copy* of the U.S. Fire Administration’s “Emergency Services Ergonomics and 

Wellness” handbook to learn more corrective measures to help increase the safety of emergency responders, 

reduce the costs of worker’s compensation claims, maximize the longevity of emergency service careers, and 

assist with sending personnel into healthy retirements.

*Quantity restrictions apply.

Visit usfa.fema.gov

to learn more.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          63,649
<SECURITIES>                                    21,405
<RECEIVABLES>                                  480,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,110
<PP&E>                                          16,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (774)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 581,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          436,069
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     145,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   581,420
<SALES>                                         22,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,155
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23

                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. of our report dated February 21, 2002,
included in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of Graybar Electric
Company, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Graybar Electric
Company, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, the
financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation
to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.


                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
February 21, 2002
# Index of Worksheets

# Fires & Losses Trends 2006-2015

# Fires by Gen Property Type 2015

# Res Bldg Fire & Loss '06-'15

# Nonres Bldg Fire & Loss '06-'15

# Vehicle Fire & Loss '06-'15

# Out-Other Fire & Loss '06-'15

# Res Bldg Fire Causes 2015

# Nonres Bldg Fire Causes 2015

# Vehicle Fire Causes 2015

# Outside Fire Causes 2015

# Other Fire Causes 2015
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-1 and 15d-14
    As adopted pursuance to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Marshall Chadwell, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Monarch Services,
    Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
        supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
        registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
        to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
        period in which this annual report is being prepared;

    b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
        the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
        and

    c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
        most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
        reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors, (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  July 28, 2006

/s/    MARSHALL CHADWELL
------------------------
Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
HYNES & HOWES INSURANCE COUNSELORS, INC.
                          Notes to Financial Statements
                     Years Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998



Note 3 - Related Party Transactions

         The Company has entered into a management consultant agreement with Oak
         Helm Partners.  The Company pays a retainer fee of $3,250 per month.

         The Company occupies office space in a building located at 2920
         Harrison Street, Davenport, Iowa, owned by the Heather Trust.  The
         Company rents approximately 700 square feet of space with furnishings
         at a monthly rate of $600.  There is no written lease agreement.  The
         Company made 13 payments in the year ended September 30, 1999.

Note 4 - Other Current Assets

                                                   1999                1998
         Real estate contracts receivable
           current portion (Note 5)         $     3,807         $     7,920
         Real estate tax certificates             1,368                 130
              Total                         $     5,175         $     8.050

Note 5 - Real Estate Contracts Receivable

                                                   1999                1998

         Contracts receivable               $   684,288         $   647,528
         Less current portion (Note 4)           (3,807)             (7,920)
         Long-term portion                  $   680,481         $   639,608

         At September 30, 1999 and 1998 there were eighteen contracts
         receivable.  The monthly payment of principal and interest was $7,036
         at September 30, 1999 and $7,189 at September 30, 1998.  Interest rates
         on these contracts varies from 10% to 12.5%.

         Management is of the opinion that an allowance for uncollectibility is
         not necessary due to the collateral value of the properties.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
VISION CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 3,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                                  8,152
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           5,874
<ALLOWANCES>                                              293
<INVENTORY>                                             7,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       23,879
<PP&E>                                                  9,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                          3,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         46,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   9,996
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   81
<OTHER-SE>                                             32,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           46,157
<SALES>                                                 9,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        9,196
<CGS>                                                   5,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           5,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           21
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            10
<INCOME-TAX>                                                4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         6
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                6
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00
        

</TABLE>
A92A1260.

#### LEE v. STATE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD OF GEORGIA.

(423 SE2d 26)

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, a master plumber, brought a declaratory judgment action against the State Construction Industry Licensing Board of Georgia seeking a declaration as to whether he can be investigated and disciplined for the conduct of plumbers that are employed by Plumbing, Inc., a business which plaintiff owns and manages. The superior court dismissed the action “on the basis of the doctrines of res *498judicata and collateral estoppel,” finding that previous administrative and appellate proceedings between the parties provided plaintiff with “ample guidance” and that, therefore, declaratory relief was inappropriate. Plaintiff appeals, asserting the superior court erred in taking judicial notice of the prior proceedings and in determining that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel applied. Held:

Decided September 16, 1992.

*G. Brian Spears,*for appellant.

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Beverly B. Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Andrew S. Ree, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

1. A trial court may take judicial notice of its own records. *Petkas v. Grizzard,*252 Ga. 104, 108 (312 SE2d 107); *Walker v. McLarty,*199 Ga. App. 460, 461 (405 SE2d 294).

2. “Any party may contest or argue the effect the prior record has on the case or issue being litigated and may cite to portions of the record which have been recognized or incorporated by the court. Because a ruling on the effect of the prior case may be raised on appeal, the record or portion thereof considered by the trial court should be designated to be included in the appeal if a party wishes to enumerate error on the ruling.

“The general rule is that the burden is on the complaining party to perfect the record for appeal. The application of that rule would be appropriate in cases where a court has taken judicial cognizance of other records which are in the trial court.” *Petkas v. Grizzard,*252 Ga. 104, 108, supra.

The prior proceedings were not designated as part of the record on this appeal. It follows that plaintiff has not carried his burden of demonstrating error with regard to the application of the res judicata and collateral estoppel doctrines. *Petkas v. Grizzard,*252 Ga. 104, 108, supra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Sognier, C. J., and Cooper, J., concur.*