alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hynes & Howes Insurance Counselors, Inc.
Davenport, Iowa


                          Independent Auditor's Report

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hynes & Howes Insurance
Counselors, Inc. as of September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related statements
of operation, retained earnings, paid-in-capital, and cash flows for the years
ended September 30 , 1997 and 1996 and 1995.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of the company's management.  My responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Hynes & Howes Insurance Counselors,
Inc. at September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations and its
cash flow for the years ended September 30, 1997, and 1996 and 1995, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.





                                 Everette E. Wilson
                                 Certified Public Accountant

December 10, 1997
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5960 

To direct the payment of passport fees to the Department of State. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Mr. LEE of New York (for himself, Mr. HIGGINS, and Mr. MARCHANT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the payment of passport fees to the Department 

of State. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passport Acquisition 

5 Savings and Security Act of 2010’’ or the ‘‘PASS Act of 

6 2010’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF PASSPORT FEES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(a) of the Act of June 

9 4, 1920 (22 U.S.C. 214(a)), is amended, in the first senVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:51 Jul 31, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5960.IH H5960

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5960 IH

1 tence, by striking ‘‘into the Treasury of the United 

2 States’’ and inserting ‘‘to the Department of State’’. 

3 (b) RETENTION OF FEES.—Any amount collected by 

4 the Department of State in fiscal year 2011 and each fis5 cal year thereafter as a fee for visas, passports, or other 

6 consular services may be credited as an offsetting collec7 tion to the appropriate Department of State appropria8 tion, to remain available until expended, for the purpose 

9 of meeting the costs of providing such services and shall 

10 be available for the same purposes as the appropriation 

11 to which such amounts are credited. 

12 (c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con13 gress that new revenues directed to the Department of 

14 State under this Act should be used to reduce the costs 

15 of passports for consumers. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 2 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-6-2007

In Re: Michael Hodge

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-1200

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Michael Hodge " (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1521.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1521
ALD-132 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 07-1200

________________

IN RE: MICHAEL EUGENE HODGE,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 06-cv-01622)

_____________________________________

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. Pro.

February 23, 2007

Before: Sloviter, Chagares and Nygaard, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: March 6, 2007)

_______________________

 OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM

Michael Eugene Hodge petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus ordering the

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to appoint counsel to

assist him in his pending civil rights action. Because Hodge has not demonstrated that he

is entitled to such relief, we will deny his petition.

Hodge submitted his mandamus petition shortly after the District Court dismissed
 Because it was not initially clear whether Hodge intended an appeal or a mandamus 1

petition, the case was listed in the alternative for possible dismissal under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e). We have since determined that this is indeed a mandamus petition and, thus, do

not dismiss the action under § 1915(e).

2

his appeal of the Magistrate Judge’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. He

argues that he is entitled to mandamus relief because the Magistrate Judge abused his

discretion by not appointing counsel. A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy

that will issue only where the petitioner has no alternate means of obtaining the desired

relief and entitlement to the writ is clear and indisputable. See Madden v. Myers, 102

F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996). For instance, “a writ of mandamus may not issue if a

petitioner can obtain relief by appeal.” Id. at 77. Upon reviewing the record, we

conclude that Hodge has not shown extraordinary circumstances justifying mandamus

relief. To the extent that he is seeking immediate appellate review of the challenged

orders, we note that they are not appealable until the District Court enters a final

judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Smith-Bey v. Petsock, 741 F.2d 22, 23-26 (3d Cir.

1984). Finally, we deny the motion for counsel Hodge filed in this Court.1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-379-000]

Take notice that on April 18, 2001, Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company (Tuscarora) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 51, to become effective on May 18, 2001.

Tuscarora states that the purpose of this filing is revise its hourly delivery requirement in order to provide natural gas transportation service to new electric generating facilities.

Tuscarora states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all affected customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10473 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                                          246,880 
<SECURITIES>                                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0 
<INVENTORY>                                                           0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                246,880 
<PP&E>                                                                0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               20,652,044 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           860,013 
<BONDS>                                                      15,166,177 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         3,536,930 
<PREFERRED>                                                           0 
<COMMON>                                                            355 
<OTHER-SE>                                                      588,569 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 20,652,044 
<SALES>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0 
<CGS>                                                                 0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  8,464 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (5,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (5,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (5,698)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (.04)
        

</TABLE>
# CE2010212EN.01045301.xml

| 5.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 212/453 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 212/453

---

Thursday 7 May 2009Bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries concerning sectoral matters and covering applicable law in contractual and non-contractual obligations ***I

P6_TA(2009)0380

European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 May 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a procedure for the negotiation and conclusion of bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries concerning sectoral matters and covering applicable law in contractual and non-contractual obligations (COM(2008)0893 – C6-0001/2009 – 2008/0259(COD))

2010/C 212 E/55

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0893),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 61(c), 65 and 67(5) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0001/2009),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0270/2009),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Thursday 7 May 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0259

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 7 May 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a procedure for the negotiation and conclusion of agreements between Member States and third countries on particular matters concerning the law applicable to contractual and non-contractual obligations

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 662/2009.)

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 30, 2009 

0930 

Order 

 

September 30, 2009 

138180-1 

RAYMOND O’NEAL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138180, 138181 

 COA: 277317, 277318 

Wayne CC: 05-515351-NH 

ST. JOHN HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, 

RALPH DILISIO, M.D., and EFSTATHIOS 

TAPAZOGLOU, M.D., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the requirements set forth in the 

second sentence of MCL 600.2912a(2) apply in this case; (2) if not, whether the plaintiff 

presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of fact with regard to whether the 

defendants’ conduct proximately caused his injury, or (3) if so, whether Fulton v William 

Beaumont Hosp, 253 Mich App 70 (2002), was correctly decided, or whether a different 

approach is required to correctly implement the second sentence of § 2912a(2). 

 The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the January 2010 session 

calendar for argument and submission. Appellant’s brief and appendix must be filed no 

later than November 13, 2009, and appellees’ brief and appendix, if appellees choose to 

submit an appendix, must be filed no later than December 4, 2009. 

 The Michigan State Medical Society, Michigan Health and Hospital Association, 

Michigan Association for Justice, and Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., are invited 

to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later than December 16, 2009. Other persons or 

groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the 

Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later than December 16, 

2009.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6209 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6209

   To adjust the boundary of the Carson National Forest, New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2010

  Mr. Lujan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To adjust the boundary of the Carson National Forest, New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Carson National Forest Boundary 
Adjustment Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. CARSON NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--The boundary of the Carson National Forest in the 
State of New Mexico is adjusted to incorporate the approximately 4,990 
acres of land generally depicted as ``Miranda Canyon Boundary'' on the 
map entitled ``Carson National Forest Boundary Adjustment'' and dated 
September 21, 2010.
    (b) Land and Water Conservation Fund.--For purposes of section 7 of 
the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-9), 
the boundaries of the Carson National Forest, as modified under 
subsection (a), shall be considered to be the boundaries of the Carson 
National Forest as in existence on January 1, 1965.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit



    
	
			
	
	 
	Exhibit 10.1















November 27, 2019


Cory Sindelar
[Redacted]
[Redacted]


Re:    Option Award Eligibility


Dear Cory:


The purpose of this letter is to confirm our recent discussions regarding your eligibility to receive additional equity compensation from Calix, Inc. (the “Company”).


As an incentive for you to continue your employment with the Company and based on other considerations, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has granted you an option under the Company’s 2019 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.  Subject to your continued employment with the Company, on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of this letter, you will automatically be granted an additional option under the Plan (or any successor thereto).  In 2020, such option shall cover 150,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, and in each of 2021, 2022 and 2023, such option shall cover 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.  Each option will have an exercise price per share equal to the closing trading price of a share of Company Common Stock on the date of grant (or the immediately preceding trading day if the Company’s Common Stock is not traded on the date of grant) and will vest and become exercisable over four years, with 25% of each option vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date of such option, and the remainder of the option vesting in equal quarterly installments over three years (i.e., 6.25% of the shares per quarter).  Notwithstanding the foregoing, no shares issued upon exercise of an option may be transferred in any manner prior to the second anniversary of the date such shares vested, except for transfers effected by will or by the laws of descent or distribution. Each option will otherwise be subject to the Plan and the Company’s standard option agreement. 


Nothing in this letter confers upon you any right to continued employment or other service with the Company or interferes in any way with the at-will nature of your employment.  This letter is intended to supplement the offer of employment from the Company to you dated September 28, 2017 (the “Offer Letter”). This letter, together with the Offer Letter, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject 




Page 1 of 2












matter hereof and replaces and supersedes any other agreements, arrangements, understandings or promises made to you by anyone, whether oral or written, regarding the subject matter hereof.  In the event of any conflict between the terms of this letter and the Offer Letter, the terms of this letter shall prevail. 


Please indicate your acknowledgement and acceptance of the terms of this letter by signing in the space indicated below and returning a signed copy of this letter to me at your earliest convenience.




Sincerely,
Calix, Inc.




   /s/ Carl Russo    
By:    Carl Russo
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer


Accepted, Acknowledged and Agreed:


   /s/ Cory Sindelar    
Cory Sindelar


Date:     11/28/2019    












Page 2 of 2