alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-04495]

                    In accordance with Section 250(A), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on February 22, 2001, applicable to workers of Johnson Electric Automotive, Brownsville, Texas. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 5, 2001 (66 FR 18119).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. Information provided by the State and the company shows that some employees of the subject firm were temporary workers from Austin Temporary Services, Harlingen, Texas to produce shafts of motors for lawnmowers and boats at the Brownsville, Texas location.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending the certification to include temporary workers of Austin Temporary Services, Harlingen, Texas employed at Johnson Electric Automotive, Inc., Brownsville, Texas. 

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Johnson Electric Automotive, Inc., Brownsville, Texas adversely affected by a shift of production to Mexico. 

The amended notice applicable to NAFTA—04495 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Johnson Electric Automotive, Inc., Brownsville, Texas including temporary workers of Austin Temporary Services, Harlingen, Texas who were engaged in the production of shafts of motors for lawnmowers and boats at Johnson Electric Automotive, Inc., Brownsville, Texas who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 26, 2000 through February 22, 2003 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of April, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-10948 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                    ------------
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeff Criswell, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of CYBERADS, INC.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
    business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and
    procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
    the small business issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
        to ensure that material information relating to the small business
        issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
        others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
        this report is being prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
        controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
        about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


Date: June 7, 2006

/s/ JEFF CRISWELL
------------------------
Jeff Criswell
President
EXHIBIT 12. 2
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Seiji EnamiSeiji EnamiDirector,
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Kysor Industrial Corporation
Cadillac, Michigan



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Kysor Industrial Corporation on Form S-8 (as
listed below) of our report dated January 30, 1996, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Kysor Industrial Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



PLAN 	                                       		SEC FILE

	

1980 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan    	2-67607

1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan	               	2-86346

1984 Stock Option Plan			       		2-99855

1987 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan	 	33-18438 and 33-30463

Employee Stock Ownership Plan		            	33-27360

401(K) Savings Plan for Bargaining Employees   		33-59420     

401(K) Savings Plan for Non-Bargaining Employees 	33-59412

1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan		       		33-71758





By   s\COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.





Detroit, Michigan
March 21, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          30,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,772
<INVENTORY>                                     51,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,237
<PP&E>                                         837,161
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,874,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          137,478
<BONDS>                                      1,198,879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       869,459
<OTHER-SE>                                   (318,755)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,874,783
<SALES>                                        546,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               546,461
<CGS>                                          143,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  596,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (150,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (176,493)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 58,680
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (117,813)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.80)






</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Legette, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered February 13, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2), by permission, from an order of the same court, dated February 23, 1988, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction.

Ordered that the judgment and the order are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court, after conducting a full evidentiary hearing, properly denied *761his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to set aside the jury verdict. The record discloses that the evidence adduced at the hearing consisted principally of a prior recantation made by a civilian informant who, together with two police officers, had identified the defendant at trial. Such evidence was properly rejected by the Supreme Court as insufficient to warrant vacatur of the verdict. It has been held that in order to constitute newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial, the evidence proffered must, *inter alia,*do more than merely impeach or contradict the former evidence *(see, People v Salemi,*309 NY 208, *cert denied*350 US 950; *People v Clerkin,*144 AD2d 684, 685; *People v Seneci,*133 AD2d 432). Moreover, it has also been observed that "[rjecantation evidence is inherently unreliable and is insufficient alone to require setting aside a conviction” *(see, People v Brown,*126 AD2d 898, 900; *People v Allison,*119 AD2d 1005). Guided by the foregoing principles, it is our view that neither the recantation evidence produced nor the other evidentiary materials proffered by the defendant in support of the motion justified the setting aside of the defendant’s judgment of conviction under the circumstances presented.

Since the defendant failed to object to the closure of the courtroom at trial, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Gonzalez,*135 AD2d 829). In any event, the record reveals that one of the testifying officers—who had formerly worked as a team member with an informant and a second testifying officer—was still active in an undercover capacity, thereby sufficiently establishing that closure was necessary to protect the active officer’s identity, her ongoing investigations, and the integrity of the pending cases on which all three team members had collaborated *(see, People v Policano,*139 AD2d 773; *People v Gonzalez, supra).*

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or lacking in merit. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6392 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5003 Westfields Boulevard in Centreville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Colonel George Juskalian Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6392 EH

1 SECTION 1. COLONEL GEORGE JUSKALIAN POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 5003 Westfields Boulevard in 

5 Centreville, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Colonel George Juskalian Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Colonel George 

11 Juskalian Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6392 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostJuskalian Post Office Building’’. in Centreville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Colonel George al Service located at 5003 Westfields Boulevard
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TRANSPORTADORA ATON, S.A. de C.V,

Appellant,

v.

DIAMOND MARQUEZ and DAVID 

HERNANDEZ,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00052-CV

Appeal from the

243rd Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2022DCV0750)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees 

recover from Appellant all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC. SUBSIDIARIES

Checkpoint Systems, S.A. - Argentina
Checkpoint Systems (Aust/ NZ) Pty Ltd - Australia
Checkpoint Systems GmbH - Austria
Actron Belgium and Luxemburg N.V. - Belgium
Checkpoint Europe N.V. - Belgium
Checkpoint Systems Belgium N.V. - Belgium
D & D Security N.V. - Belgium
Meto N.V. - Belgium
Checkpoint do Brasil Ltda. - Brazil
Checkpoint Caribbean Ltd. - Cayman Island
Checkpoint Canada, Inc. - Canada
Meto Canada, Inc. -- Canada
Checkpoint Commercial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. - China
Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone Avenue Ticker & Label Manufacturing Co., Ltd.-China
Checkpoint Systems (CZ) s.r.o. - Czech Republic
Checkpoint Systems Danmark A/S - Denmark
Checkpoint Meto Finland OY - Finland
Checkpoint Systems France S.A.S. - France
Checkpoint Systems GmbH - Germany
Checkpoint Systems Holding GmbH - Germany
Checkpoint Systems International GmbH - Germany
Checkpoint Systems Europe GmbH - Germany
Checkpoint Solutions GmbH -- Germany
ADS Asia Limited -- Hong Kong
Checkpoint Systems Hong Kong Ltd. - Hong Kong
ADS India Private Limited - India
Checkpoint Systems India Pvt - India
Checkpoint Systems Italia S.p.A. - Italy
Checkpoint Systems Japan Co. Ltd. - Japan
Checkpoint Manufacturing Japan Co. Ltd. - Japan
UAB Checkpoint Vilnius - Lithuania
Checkpoint Systems (M) Sdn. Bhd. - Malaysia
Checkpoint Systems Sales (M) Sdn. Bhd. - Malaysia
Checkpoint de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. - Mexico
Checkpoint Holland Holding B.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint Holland Trading B.V. -- The Netherlands
CP International Systems C.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint Meto Benelux B.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint Systems Europe B.V. - The Netherlands
ID Systems Europe B.V. - The Netherlands
ID Systems Productie B.V. - The Netherlands
Kimball Systems B.V. - The Netherlands
Checkpoint Systems Ltd. - New Zealand
Checkpoint Meto Norge A/S - Norway
Checkpoint Systems (CEE) Spolka z.o.o. -- Poland
Checkpoint Portugal Sistemas Anti-Furto, S.A. - Portugal
Checkpoint Systems (SK) s.r.o.- Slovakia
Checkpoint Systems Espana S.L.- Spain
Checkpoint Systems Sverige A.B. - Sweden
Turn-O-Matic International A.B. - Sweden
Checkpoint Export A.G. - Switzerland
Checkpoint Systems A.G. -- Switzerland
ADS Eticket Limited Sirketi - Turkey
Actron Group Ltd. - United Kingdom
Actron U.K. Ltd. - United Kingdom
ADS Solutions Limited -- United Kingdom
ADS UK Ltd. -- United Kingdom
ADS (United Kingdom) Ltd. - United Kingdom

<PAGE>

ADS Worldwide Ltd. -- United Kingdom
Avenue Data Systems Ltd - United Kingdom
Checkpoint Systems U.K. Ltd. - United Kingdom
Evagard Ltd. - United Kingdom
Meto U.K. Ltd. - United Kingdom
Checkpoint International LLC - USA
Checkpoint Security Systems Group, Inc. - USA
<PAGE> 1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 21



                        GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                              --------------------


Graybar Foreign Sales Corporation, a Barbados corporation

Graybar International, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Financial Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Electric de Mexico, S. DE R.L. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation

Graybar Electric Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation

Graybar Foundation, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Services, Inc., an Illinois corporation

Distribution Associates, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar Electric (Ontario) Limited, an Ontario corporation

Graybar International PTE LTD, a Singapore corporation

Graybar Business Services, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Graybar International de Chile Limitada, a Chile limited liability
partnership

Graybar Electric Canada Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation

Graybar Commerce Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.6(d)



AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE   
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. 
RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN


WHEREAS, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (the “Company”) is the Plan Sponsor of the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Plan Section 7.01 the Plan may be amended at anytime; and
WHEREAS, and on August 1, 2019, the Company purchased certain assets of GE Oil and Gas LLC; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide for Employees hired in connection with the purchase of certain assets of GE Oil and Gas LLC on August 1, 2019 and to receive credit for service with GE Oil and Gas LLC for purposes of Core Contributions.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 2.67 shall be amended to include a new section (f) to read as follows:


“(f) An Employee who was an employee of GE Oil and Gas LLC and who was hired by the Company in connection with the purchase of certain assets of GE Oil and Gas LLC on August 1, 2019, shall be credited with a Year of Service for each 12 consecutive month period during the period beginning on the Employee’s service date with GE Oil and Gas LLC and ending on the Employee’s Severance from Service Date.”
		
	2.
	In all other respects the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its Senior Vice President Chief Human Resources Officer to execute this Fourth Amendment to the Plan on this ________________ day of July 2019.


AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.


By: ________________________________ 
Senior Vice President Chief Human Resources Officer
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2008 on the consolidated financial statements
      of Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd. (formerly known as “Pingchuan
      Pharmaceutical, Inc.”) for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, included
      in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
      2007.






/s/
                Kempisty & Company CPAs P.C.Kempisty
                & Company,Certified
                Public Accountants, P.C.





New
      York,
      NY


Dated:
      October 21, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 2904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1078]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


SES Performance Review Board Members

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the SES 
Performance Review Board of EEOC for FY 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Cornwell Johnson, Director, 
Office of Human Resources, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 
1801 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20507, (202) 663-4306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the requirement of 5 U.S.C. 
4314(c)(1), membership of the SES Performance Review Board is as 
follows: Ms. Emilie G. Heller, Director, Policy Management and 
Coordination, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Chair); Mr. 
James N. Finney, Associate General Counsel, Systemic Investigations and 
Review Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Mr. John P. 
Rowe, Director, Chicago District Office, Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission; and Ms. Peggy Mastroianni, Associate Legal Counsel, Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission (Alternate).

    Signed at Washington, D.C., on the 8th day of January 2001.
    For the EEOC.

Ida L. Castro,
Chairwoman.
[FR Doc. 01-1078 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P