alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  of  our report dated April 14, 2003
relating  to  the  financial  statements of XENICENT, INC. (Formerly: Great Land
Development,  Inc.)  in  the annual report on form 10-KSB statement dated on May
13,  2003  and  to  the  reference to our firm therein under Item 13. "Experts."



Perrella  &  Associates,  P.A.
Pompano  Beach,  Florida
May  13,  2003
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6411 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To provide for the approval of the Agreement Between the 

Government of the United States of America and the 

Government of Australia Concerning Peaceful Uses of 

Nuclear Energy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6411 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE 

2 GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF 

3 AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF AUS4 TRALIA CONCERNING PEACEFUL USES OF 

5 NUCLEAR ENERGY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the provisions 

7 for congressional consideration of a proposed agreement 

8 for cooperation in subsection d. of section 123 of the 

9 Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the Agree10 ment Between the Government of the United States of 

11 America and the Government of Australia Concerning 

12 Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, done at New York, May 

13 4, 2010, may become effective on or after October 8, 2010, 

14 as if all the requirements in such section 123 for consider15 ation of such agreement had been satisfied, subject to sub16 section (b) of this section. 

17 (b) APPLICABILITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF

18 1954 AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.—Upon coming 

19 into effect, the agreement referred to in subsection (a) 

20 shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy 

21 Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other appli22 cable United States law as if such agreement had come 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6411 RFS 

1 into effect in accordance with the requirements of section 

2 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”), for the period ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald Johnston, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to his knowledge:







1.
            This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
  amended.






2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  August
      7, 2008
            /s/
      Ronald W. JohnstonRonald
      W. JohnstonChief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 687 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 687

     To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to repeal wage 
 requirements applicable to laborers and mechanics employed on Federal-
      aid highway and public transportation construction projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2009

 Ms. Foxx (for herself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Pitts, and Mr. 
 Hensarling) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to repeal wage 
 requirements applicable to laborers and mechanics employed on Federal-
      aid highway and public transportation construction projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highway Trust Fund Reform Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. PREVAILING RATE OF WAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Repeals.--The following provisions are repealed:
            (1) Section 113 of title 23, United States Code (and the 
        item relating to such section in the analysis for chapter 1 of 
        such title).
            (2) Section 5333(a) of title 49, United States Code.
    (b) Applicability.--
            (1) Effective date.--Subject to paragraph (2), the 
        amendments made by this section shall take effect on the 31st 
        day following the date of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Existing contracts.--The amendments made by this 
        section shall not affect any contract in existence on the date 
        of enactment of this Act or made pursuant to an invitation for 
        bids outstanding on such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Technology Transfer Act of 1986

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed cooperative research & development agreement 
(CRADA) negotiations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating 
entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) 
with Hamilton Operating, Inc., to obtain and characterize various 
coalbeds from the Eagle Pass Basin, in south Texas.
    Inquiries: If any other parties are interested in similar 
activities with the USGS, please contact Charles E. Barker, USGS Denver 
Federal Center, Sixth Ave. and Kipling St., Building 20, MS 977, 
Denver, CO 80225, (303) 236-5797.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is submitted to meet the USGS 
requirements stipulated in Survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

P. Patrick Leahy,
Associate Director for Geology.
[FR Doc. 01-10817 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                        41
<INVENTORY>                                         20
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,271
<PP&E>                                          19,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           985
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,964
<SALES>                                        117,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,599
<CGS>                                           96,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,854
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,343)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,279
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                (31,611)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,750)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.76)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                    LIST OF IMCO RECYCLING INC. SUBSIDIARIES

Wholly owned unless otherwise indicated as of March 1, 2002.

1.  IMCO Investment Company, a Delaware Corporation

2.  Interamerican Zinc, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

3.  IMCO Recycling of Ohio Inc., a Delaware Corporation

4.  IMCO Management Partnership L.P., a Texas Limited Partnership

5.  IMCO Recycling of California, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

6.  IMCO Energy Corp., a Delaware Corporation

7.  IMCO International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

8.  IMCO Recycling of Indiana Inc., a Delaware Corporation

9.  IMCO Recycling of Illinois Inc., an Illinois Corporation

10. IMCO Indiana Partnership L.P., an Indiana Limited Partnership

11. Pittsburg Aluminum, Inc., a Kansas Corporation

12. VAW-IMCO GuB und Recycling GmbH, a private company with limited liability
    organized under the laws of Germany (50% owned)

13. IMCO Recycling of Michigan L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company

14. IMCO Recycling (UK) LTD., a private company limited by shares and organized
    under the laws of England and Wales

15. IMSAMET, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

16. IMCO Recycling of Idaho Inc., a Delaware Corporation

17. IMCO Recycling of Utah Inc., a Delaware Corporation

                                       75

<PAGE>

                    LIST OF IMCO RECYCLING INC. SUBSIDIARIES

18. Imsamet of Arizona, an Arizona General Partnership (70% owned)

19. Solar Aluminum Technology Services, a Utah General Partnership (50% owned)

20. Rock Creek aluminum, Inc., an Ohio Corporation

21. Alchem Aluminum, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

22. IMCO Recycling Holding B.V., a private company with limited liability
    organized under the laws of the Netherlands

23. Dutch Aluminum C.V., a limited partnership organized under the laws of the
    Netherlands

24. U.S. Zinc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

25. Gulf Reduction Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

26. Midwest Zinc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

27. MetalChem, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation

28. Western Zinc Corporation, a Califonia Corporation

29. U.S. Zinc Export Corporation, a Texas Corporation

30. IMCO -- FSC, Inc., a Barbados Corporation

31. MetalChem Canada Incorporated, an Ontario Corporation

32. MetalChem Handel GmbH, a private company with limited liability organized
    under the laws of Germany

33. Alchem Aluminum Shelbyville Inc., a Delaware Corporation

34. Indiana Aluminum Inc., an Indiana Corporation

35. IMCO Funding Corporation, a Delaware Corporation organized as a Qualified
    Special Purpose Entity

36. IMCO Recycling Services Company, a Delaware Corporation

37. IMCO Operations Services Company, a Delaware Corporation

38. IMCO Reciclaje de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a limited liability company
    with variable capital organized under the laws of Mexico

39. IMCO Reciclaje de Nuevo Leon, S. de R.L. de C.V., a limited liability
    company with variable capital organized under the laws of Mexico.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6392 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6392

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 5003 Westfields Boulevard in Centreville, Virginia, as the ``Colonel 
                George Juskalian Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

  Mr. Wolf (for himself, Mr. Perriello, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Boucher, Mr. 
Wittman, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Connolly of Virginia, Mr. Scott of 
   Virginia, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Nye, and Mr. Goodlatte) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 5003 Westfields Boulevard in Centreville, Virginia, as the ``Colonel 
                George Juskalian Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLONEL GEORGE JUSKALIAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5003 Westfields Boulevard in Centreville, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Colonel George Juskalian Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
George Juskalian Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
387 P.2d 799

#### The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Jose Emilio SUAREZ, Appellant.

No. 1365.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Bane.

Dec. 18, 1963.

Bernard I. Rabinovitz, Tucson, for appellant.

Robert W. Pickrell, Atty. Gen., Norman E. Green, County Atty., Pima County, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and sentenced to an indeterminate term of 10 to-IS years. The transcript of testimony shows that prior to appellant’s arrest the store which was burglarized had been checked by a police officer who found nothing-wrong. About five minutes later the same police officer returning on his rounds found the glass in the door to the store broken. Appellant was inside the store with the booty in his pockets. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty and was represented by counsel at the trial.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal in propria persona and counsel was appointed by the trial court, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13— 161, to handle his appeal. Counsel advised. *96this court by written communication that Tie had searched the record including the •transcript of testimony and has been un.able to find grounds upon which an appeal ■could be based. This court ordered the appeal be submitted. On examination of the irecord and transcript we find no error.

Affirmed.

BERNSTEIN, C. J., UDALL, V. C. J., and STRUCKMEYER, JENNINGS and .LOCKWOOD, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry B. CARROLL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-15542

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 13, 2011.

Robert G. Davies, Randall Joseph Hensel, Thomas F. Kirwin, Thomas P. Swaim, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Terry B. Carroll, Coleman, FL, pro se.

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

*915PER CURIAM:

Terry B. Carroll, proceeding *pro se,*appeals the district court’s denial of his motion, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36, to correct a purported error in his presentence investigation report (“PSI”). Carroll argues that the district court erred in denying his motion, because (1) the sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. §§ 3C1.2 and 3A1.2(b) are not supported by the record, (2) both enhancements relied on the same conduct, resulting in double counting, and (3) he did not endanger the public by fleeing on a public road or highway or at a high rate of speed. After thorough review, we affirm.

We review *de novo*the application of Rule 36 to correct a district court’s sentencing judgment. *United States v. Portillo,*363 F.3d 1161, 1164 (11th Cir.2004). We have made it clear that Rule 36 may not be used to make a substantive alteration to a criminal sentence. *Id.*Instead, Rule 36 is properly applied to correct clerical errors that are minor or technical in nature or to modify the written judgment to be consistent with the oral sentencing announcement. *Id.*at 1164-65. Generally, a defendant who alleges that his PSI contains false information must raise that claim at sentencing and on direct appeal, rather than for the first time in a post-conviction proceeding. *United States v. Peloso,*824 F.2d 914, 915 (11th Cir.1987).

Although Carroll contends that he is not attempting to challenge his sentence, he is seeking to make a substantive change to the district court’s determination regarding his sentence. The district court applied the enhancements, in paragraphs 30 and 32 of the PSI, after substantial discussion with both parties and after considering Carroll’s own recommendation, through counsel, that the district court apply the enhancements to ensure a concurrent sentence. The PSI, without Carroll’s requested modifications, correctly reflects the oral judgment of the district court. The removal of paragraph 32 would substantively alter the sentencing guidelines calculation of the district court, and thus, is an inappropriate use of Rule 36. *Portillo,*363 F.3d at 1164. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D. Beatty DAlessandro, Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                 

|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ D. BEATTY DALESSANDRO                           
|D. Beatty DAlessandro                               
|Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer

March 10, 2009

---
Exhibit 10.18






    1


     


    





    2


     


    





    3


     


    





    4


     


    





    5


     


    





    6


     


    





    7


     


    





    8


     


    





    9


     


    





    10


     


    





    11


     


    





    12


     


    





    13


     


    





    14


     


    





    15


     


    





    16


     


    





    17


     


    





    18


     


    





    19


     


    





    20


     


    





    21


     


    





    22


     


    





    23


     


    





    24


     


    





    25


     


    





    26


     


    





    27


     


    





    28


     


    





    29


     


    





    30


     


    





    31


     


    





    32


     


    





    33


     


    





    34


     


    





    35


     


    





    36


     


    




    37


     


    

    



    38


     


    

    



    39


     


    
        



    40


     


    
        



    41


     


    
        





42
EXHIBIT 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

To:        The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Indenture Trustee

           The undersigned, duly authorized representatives of BMW Financial
Services NA, LLC ("BMW FS"), as Servicer, pursuant to the Trust Sale and
Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2000 (as amended and supplemented,
or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the "Agreement"), by and
among BMW Auto Leasing LLC as Transferor, BMW FS, as Servicer, and FINANCIAL
SERVICES VEHICLE TRUST, as the Trust, do hereby certify that: 1. BMW FS is, as
of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.

           2. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer and is duly authorized
pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Rating
Agencies, the Owner Trustee, any Agent and any Enhancement Providers.

           3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar
year ended December 31, 2001, and of its performance under the Agreement was
conducted under my supervision.

           4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
knowledge, performed in all material respects all of its obligations under the
Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performance of such
obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5
below.

           5. The following is a description of each default in the performance
of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me
to have been made by the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2001, which
sets forth in detail the (a) nature of each such default, (b) the action taken
by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (c) the current status
of each such default: NONE

           Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used as defined in
the Agreement.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
certificate this 25th day of April 2002.

                                                  By:   /s/ John Christman
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     John Christman
                                                     CEO