alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 2, 2001.

# PLACE:

Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Closed in Part [Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10)].

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

It was determined by a majority vote of the Commission that part of the Commission meeting to consider and act upon the following take place in closed session:

1. Eagle Energy, Inc., Docket No. WEVA 98-123 (Issues include whether substantial evidence supports the judge's finding that the operator violated the regulations governing preshift and onshift mine examinations by failing to observe unsupported kettle bottoms; whether the judge properly concluded that the violations found were the result of the operator's unwarrantable failure; whether the judge properly imposed penalties that were double in amounts from those initially assessed; and whether the judge's frequent questioning of witnesses improperly interfered with the operator's presentation of its case and reflected bias).

Any person attending the open portion of the meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

Jean Ellen, (202) 653-5629/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 01-10804 Filed 4-26-01; 12:32 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21139-21140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6971-3]


Gulf of Mexico Program Comprehensive Meeting of the Focus Teams

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Act, Public Law 92463, EPA gives 
notice of a Comprehensive Meeting of the Gulf of Mexico Program (GMP) 
Focus Teams (Public Health, Nutrient Enrichment, Habitat, and 
Nonindigenous Species).

DATES: The Comprehensive Meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 30, 
2001, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and on Thursday, May 31, 2001, from 9 a.m. 
to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 315 
Julia Street, New Orleans, LA, (504) 525-1993.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria D. Car, Designated Federal 
Officer, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Building 1103, Room 202, 
Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000 at (228) 688-2421.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed agenda is attached. The meeting is 
open to the public.

    Dated: April 18, 2001.
Gloria D. Car,
Designated Federal Officer.

Gulf of Mexico Program 2001 Comprehensive Meeting Agenda

Wednesday, May 30

8:00 a.m.--Meeting Opens.
5:00 p.m.--GMP Focus Teams (Public Health, Nutrient Enrichment, 
Habitat, and Nonindigenous Species) Convene in Separate Sessions to 
Initiate Development of FY2003 Performance Goal Recommendations and 
Supporting Strategies.

Thursday, May 31

9:00 a.m.--General Plenary Session (All Teams).
11:30 a.m.--
    <bullet> Overview of FY2001 Workplan Process and Accomplishments.
    <bullet> Briefing on FY2002 Workplan Schedule.
    <bullet> Group Discussion / Q & A.
    <bullet> Guest Speaker on Partnerships and Stakeholders.
11:30-1:00 p.m.--Lunch
1:00-3:00 p.m.--Focus Teams Re-convene in Plenary Session with Data and 
Information Transfer

[[Page 21140]]

Committee, Monitoring, Modeling and Research Committee, and Gulf 
Mapping and Assessment Center.
3:00 p.m.--Meeting Adjourns.
[FR Doc. 01-10517 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                               CAFE ODYSSEY, INC.

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              1997 STOCK OPTION AND
                                COMPENSATION PLAN



         1. Increase in Number of Shares Subject to the Plan. Section 5.1 of the
1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

                  5.1 Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment as provided in
         Section 11.6, the number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued
         under the Plan shall not exceed 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock.

         2. Effective Date. This Amendment became effective as of February 25,
1998.
Department of Agriculture 

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Quarterly Report 

Fiscal Year 2022, Quarter 1 

Agency / Component 

Number of 

Requests Received 

Number of 

Requests Processed 

Number of 

Requests 

Backlogged 

AMS 45 41 44 

APHIS 230 192 412 

DA/OSEC 89 63 115 

FAS 12 7 31 

FNS 52 90 443 

FS 441 362 720 

FSA 1811 1731 80 

FSIS 75 100 218 

NRCS 44 34 7 

OASCR 3 4 15 

OBPA 2 0 0 

OCFO 1 2 0 

OGC 13 4 27 

OHA 16 14 0 

OIG 29 29 52 

RD 88 84 70 

REE 39 30 23 

RMA 12 15 2 

AGENCY OVERALL 3002 2802 2259
(85 South. 921)

#### BRADLEY v. AMERICAN TRUST & SAVINGS BANK.

(6 Div. 993.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 20, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Hugh A. Locke, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal'dismisséd.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1501

In re: NORMAN PAUL FELTS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:21-hc-02111-FL)

Submitted: September 20, 2023 Decided: October 6, 2023

Before AGEE and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Normal Paul Felts, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1501 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/06/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Norman Paul Felts petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from this court 

directing the district court to permit him to appeal the district court’s order finding that he 

is a sexually dangerous person and committing him to the custody of the Attorney General. 

Felts has also filed a motion to expedite the decision. We conclude that Felts is not entitled 

to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when 

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to 

attain the relief [he] desires.” Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal 

quotation marks omitted). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re 

Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). To the extent Felts seeks an 

order directing that he be permitted to appeal, his appeal of the district court’s order has 

been docketed in this court as United States v. Felts, No. 23-6894, so his request is moot. 

To the extent he seeks to challenge the district court’s dangerousness finding by way of 

mandamus, we deny the petition because Felts may raise these arguments in his appeal of 

the district court’s order.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and deny the motion to 

expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1501 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/06/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1501 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/06/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GoldSpring, Inc. (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert T. Faber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my
best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/  robert t. faberRobert T. FaberChief Financial Officer April 29, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *702Mark Braun, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered December 14, 1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was in conformity with the promise made at the time of the plea. Under such circumstances, it cannot be said that the representation of counsel at sentencing was ineffective (see, *People v Sneed,*116 AD2d 676).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6290 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6290

   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require Medicaid 
                       coverage of optometrists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

 Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Engel, Mr. Terry, 
 and Mr. Barrow) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require Medicaid 
                       coverage of optometrists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING COVERAGE OF SERVICES OF OPTOMETRISTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396d(a)(5)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' before ``(B)''; and
            (2) by inserting before the semicolon at the end the 
        following: ``, and (C) medical and other health services (as 
        defined in section 1861(s)) as authorized by State law, 
        furnished by an optometrist (described in section 1861(r)(4)) 
        to the extent such services may be performed under State law''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect 90 days 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to 
        services furnished or other actions required on or after such 
        date.
            (2) Rule for changes requiring state legislation.--In the 
        case of a State plan for medical assistance under title XIX of 
        the Social Security Act which the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services determines requires State legislation (other than 
        legislation appropriating funds) in order for the plan to meet 
        the additional requirement imposed by the amendments made by 
        subsection (a), the State plan shall not be regarded as failing 
        to comply with the requirements of such title solely on the 
        basis of its failure to meet this additional requirement before 
        the first day of the first calendar quarter beginning after the 
        close of the first regular session of the State legislature 
        that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act. For 
        purposes of the previous sentence, in the case of a State that 
        has a 2-year legislative session, each year of such session 
        shall be deemed to be a separate regular session of the State 
        legislature.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5717 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, 

design, and construct a facility and to enter into agreements relating 

to education programs at the National Zoological Park facility in Front 

Royal, Virginia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2010 

Mr. BECERRA (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. MATSUI, and 

Mr. WOLF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, and construct a facility and to 

enter into agreements relating to education programs 

at the National Zoological Park facility in Front Royal, 

Virginia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Smithsonian Conserva5 tion Biology Institute Enhancement Act’’. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5717 IH

1 SEC. 2. FACILITY FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PRO2 GRAMS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Board of Regents of the 

4 Smithsonian Institution is authorized to plan, design, and 

5 construct a facility on National Zoological Park property 

6 in Front Royal, Virginia for the purpose of conducting re7 search and educational programs. 

8 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

9 authorized to be appropriated to carry out subsection 

10 (a)— 

11 (1) $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 

12 and 2011; and 

13 (2) $3,000,000 in the aggregate for all suc14 ceeding fiscal years. 

15 SEC. 3. AGREEMENTS FOR HOUSING AND OTHER SERVICES. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Board of Regents of the 

17 Smithsonian Institution is authorized to enter into agree18 ments for the provision of housing and other services to 

19 the participants in the programs described in section 1. 

20 (b) COSTS.—The housing and other services de21 scribed in subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost to 

22 the Smithsonian Institution. 

23 SEC. 4. ANIMAL HOLDING FACILITY. 

24 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 

25 is authorized to plan, design, and construct animal holding 

26 and related program facilities on National Zoological Park 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5717 IH

1 property in Front Royal, Virginia, to be funded from non2 federal sources. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAUL AARONS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1550

[ August 2, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael I. Rothschild

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 90

- 17084 CF10A

.

Paul Aarons, Defuniak Springs, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., W ARNER and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-382-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 25, 2001.

    Take notice that on April 19, 2001, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to be 
effective May 19, 2001:

55 Revised Sheet No. 50
56 Revised Sheet No. 51
23 Revised Sheet No. 52
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 56
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 263
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 263A
Second Revised Sheet No. 263B
Second Revised Sheet No. 263C
Third Revised Sheet No. 263D
Third Revised Sheet No. 263E

    Northern states that it is filing revised tariff sheets to amend 
the provisions dealing with the Carlton Commodity Surcharge as further 
discussed in the filing.
    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10738 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12

- 404 V

Filed: December 17, 2013

Not for P ublication

*************************************

JOAN ELLEN SORENSON

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Isaiah R. Kalinowski , Washington, DC , for petitioner.

Julia W. McInerny , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On December 17 , 2013 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 r equiremen t, petitioner filed a statement assert ing

that s he did not incur any costs in pursuit of her petition.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosur e would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the id entified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

Petitioner submitted h er request for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During

informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain items in petitioner’ s application

. Based on these objectio ns, petitioner amend s h er application for attor ne ys’ fees and costs to

$24, 467

. 8 0

. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to

be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $ 24, 467.8 0 , representing reimbursement for

attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a chec k payable jointly to petitioner

and Maglio, Christopher & Toale, located at 1605 Main Stree t, Suite 710, Sarasota, Florida 34236,

in the amount of $ 24, 467.8 0

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 17, 2013 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. M illman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date: September 21, 2005

/s/ Neil Christiansen

Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer