alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Leon Tempelsman, Certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lazare Kaplan
          International Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this report, fairly present in all material
          respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
          of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
          report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
          defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
          registrant and have:

          a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
               disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
               supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
               registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
               known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
               the period in which this report is being prepared;

          b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
               controls and procedures and presented in this report our
               conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
               and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
               report based on such evaluation; and

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
          on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
          reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
          registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
          functions):

          a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
               design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
               which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
               ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
               information; and

          b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
               other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
               internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 26, 2003                          By: LEON TEMPELSMAN
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                       Leon Tempelsman
                                                       (Chief Executive Officer)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-89,763-01

EX PARTE RODRIS DENARD WEBSTER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 14-0150X IN THE 71 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM HARRISON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because counsel refused to call his

witnesses and gave him bad advice. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to

relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334

S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. 

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of
2

counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s

claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: July 3, 2019

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Robert T. Faber, certify that:
     1. Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of GoldSpring, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                       /s/ robert t. faber   Robert T. Faber   *President and Chief Executive Officer*   
Date: April 29, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [NM-930-1310-01; OKNM 101622]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gloria S. Baca, BLM, New Mexico State Office, (505) 438-7566.

Dated: April 19, 2001.

Gloria S. Baca,

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. 01-10913  Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For additional information, contact Nancyellen Gentile, Committee Management Officer, 409 Third Street, NW., Washington, DC 20416; telephone (202) 205-2469.

Nancyellen Gentile,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-10805 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
VISION CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                                  8,529
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           6,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                              330
<INVENTORY>                                             7,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       24,852
<PP&E>                                                  9,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                          3,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         46,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   6,065
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   80
<OTHER-SE>                                             32,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           46,023
<SALES>                                                29,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       29,799
<CGS>                                                  19,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          19,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        3,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           371
<INCOME-TAX>                                              154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       217
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              217
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.03
        

</TABLE>
#### SHUMWAY, Appellant, v. BELEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Anna 0. Shumway against Fred Beley.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and VANN, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment of the county court reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the justice’s court affirmed, with costs.
#### WICKHAM, Respondent, v. HARTER et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by Martha M. Wickham against Sanford Harter and another.

No opinion. Judgment of the county court, Niagara county, appealed from,, affirmed, with costs.
##### In this section

              - Codes and standards (5)
              - CRR (10)
              - Events (4)
              - Leadership (8)
              - Wildfire and WUI (16)
              - Planning (11)
              - Data (8)
              - EMS (16)
              - Equipment and technology (17)
              - Fire investigation (6)
              - Funding (5)
              - Hazmat (14)
              - Health and safety (38)
              - Terrorism (4)
              - Training (6)

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- Leadership
- Planning
USFA and OSHA presentation on the emergency response notice of proposed ruling

Infogram

- Codes and standards
- Data
- Health and safety
NHTSA updates the Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
America Burning: 50 years of fire safety and prevention

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
EMR - ISAC: Making vital, timely, actionable emergency services sector information easily accessible

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
Protecting people who live or work in high-rises
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
<CIK>                    0000205422
<NAME>                   HAMPSHIRE FUNDING, INC.

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                  1801081
<SECURITIES>                                                            5509426
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            210371
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        1807032
<PP&E>                                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          7520878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   3249553
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                                  50000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                               530951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            7520878
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        1350657
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          58159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         1292498
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             569454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      723044
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             723044
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             14.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 0



</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ALVIN T. ADDERLEY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-4439

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 2, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County,

James H. Earp, Judge.

Alvin T. Adderley, Perry, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton and 

Andrea Totten, Assistant Attorney 

Generals, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Alvin T. Adderley, appeals the trial court’s order denying his Motion for 

Postconviction Relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. 

Appellant argues that the trial judge had previously disqualified himself from the 

underlying case and thus erred in ruling on Appellant’s motion. We agree. Therefore, we 

vacate the order under review and remand this case to the trial court so a successor judge 
2

can rule on the motion. We note that the State concedes that the order under review “is 

void and a nullity.”

VACATED and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
#### McGILL v. SORENSEN.

(District Court, E. D. New York.

December 17, 1913.)

1. Set-Off and Counterclaim (§ 41*)—Mutuality of Cross-Demands.

In a suit for infringement, brought by an individual assignee.of a patent, a counterclaim for infringement of another patent by a corporation of which complainant is an officer cannot be pleaded, unless it is shown that the corporation is the real party in interest as complainant.

[Ed. Note.—For other eases, see Set-Off and Counterclaim, Cent. Dig. §§ 76-79, 81; Dec. Dig. § 41.*]

2. Patents (§ 288*) — Infringement — Suits in Equity — Jurisdiction-—

Pleading—Counterclaim.

To entitle a defendant to plead a counterclaim for infringement of a patent in his answer, under rule 30 of the new equitj'- rules, it must be shown that the infringement was committed within the district, and also that complainant has a regular and established place of business therein.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Patents, Cent. Dig. §§ 460-466; Dec. Dig. § 288.*]

In Equity. Suit by James H. McGill against Peter Sorensen. On motion to strike out counterclaim in answer.

Motion sustained.

Carrington & Pierce, of New York City (Carlton B. Pierce, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Henry C. Townsend, of New York City, for defendant.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dee. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff is the assignee of the patentee of an invention manufactured by a corporation of which he is president. The defendant under rule 30 has counterclaimed on a charge of infringement of defendant’s patent by the plaintiff and by the corporation of which he is president.

[1] Motion is made to strike out the counterclaim. As to the corporation the motion must be granted, in any event, unless the defendant can show that the corporation is the party entitled to bring suit, and thus compel an amendment of the complaint or of the action to bring in the other party plaintiff.

[2] But .as to the present plaintiff, and the corporation as well, the motion must be granted. The United States District Court has jurisdiction of patent suits, and these may be brought in any district where the alleged infringer has “committed the act of infringement and has a regular and established place of business.” Section 48, Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1000 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 149]). The answer alleges an infringement in this district, but not any regular place of business.

The motion will be granted as to the plaintiff McGill.