alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 3 (i)
  CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 AMERICAN OIL & GAS, INC.  Name of Corporation
  th
     1




---



##### 



/s/
Alan GelfandAlan Gelfand, Secretary 2




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 DRGOODTEETH.COM  Name of Corporation
  th
     /s/
Alan GelfandAlan Gelfand, President Province of British Columbia
    
    
    ))
    
    
    SS.City of Vancouver
    
    
    )
 th
 /s/
Ari ShackNotary Public 3




---



##### 



ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
DrGoodTeeth.com
  NAME DrGoodTeeth.com
 REGISTERED OFFICE: RESIDENT AGENT
  PURPOSE
 AUTHORIZATION OF CAPITAL STOCK ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND ($100,000.00) ONE HUNDRED
MILLION (100,000,000)
 INCORPORATOR
 NAME
    
    POST OFFICE ADDRESSResident Agents of Nevada, Inc.
    
    711 S. Carson St., Suite 4
Carson City, Nevada 89701
 DIRECTORS
   4




---



##### 



NAME
    
    POST OFFICE ADDRESSDr. Anchana Chayawatana
    
    295/42 Ngarmwongwan 23 Road
Nonthaburi 11000 ThailandLt.
Dr. Somdul Manpiankarn
    
    237/466 Soi Saitong, Tiwanon Rd.
Nonthaburi 11000 ThailandDr. Bancha Luengaram
    
    240/28 Charansanitwong Rd.
Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700 Thailand
 STOCK NON-ASSESSABLE
 TERM OF EXISTENCE
 CUMULATIVE VOTING
 PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS
 LIMITED LIABILITY
 INDEMNIFICATION
 5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



th
 /s/
Patricia A. BozinPatricia A. Bozin, Sole Incorporator forResident Agents of Nevada, Inc. STATE OF NEVADA
    
    
    ))
    
    
    SS.COUNTY OF CARSON
    
    
    )
 th
 /s/
Alan TeegardinNotary Public 7




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
OF APPOINTMENT BY RESIDENT AGENT
   th
 /s/
Patricia A. BozinPatricia A. Bozin for
Resident Agents of Nevada, Inc. 8




---



##### 



ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 STATE OF NEVADA
    
    
    ))
    
    
    SS.CITY OF CARSON
    
    
    )
 th
 /s/
Patricia A. BozinNOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT OF RESIDENT AGENT
    th
 By

/s/ Sandra L. MillerSandra L. MillerResident Agents of Nevada, Inc.
Resident Agents 9
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10905

WILMA KEY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division

(5:96-CV-149-C)

September 4, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
#### Maria Elena Sandoval SOTO; Yaneth Soto Marlin, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71959.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2011.*

Filed April 27, 2011.

*678Maria Elena Sandoval Soto, San Francisco, CA, pro se.

Yaneth Soto Marlin San Francisco, CA, pro se.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Justin Robert Markel, Trial, OIL, Daniel Shieh, Esquire, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Elena Sandoval Soto and Yaneth Soto Marlin, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen because the motion was filed nearly ten years after the September 11, 1998, filing deadline for motions to reopen seeking relief under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.43(e)(1), and petitioners failed to establish grounds for equitable tolling, *see Albillo-De Leon v. Gonzales,*410 F.3d 1090, 1098-1100 (9th Cir.2005) (equitable tolling available where petitioner is unable to obtain vital information bearing on the existence of a claim “despite all due diligence”).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). *See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder,*633 F.3d 818, 824 (9th Cir.2011).

Petitioners’ remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Molecular Target Drug Discovery for Cancer.
    Date: April 18, 2001.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Conference Room 8052, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Joyce C. Pegues, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review, Referral, and Resources Branch, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8084, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/594-1286.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to scheduling conflicts. Any interested person may file 
written comments with the committee by forwarding the statement to 
the Contact Person listed on this notice. The statement should 
include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the 
business or professional affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 17, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10204 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7719

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID TYRONE HALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR98-192-CCB; CA-03-2911-CCB)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Tyrone Hall, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David Tyrone Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hall

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Hynes & Howes Insurance Counselors, Inc.
Davenport, Iowa


                          Independent Auditor's Report

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hynes & Howes Insurance
Counselors, Inc. as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements
of operation, retained earnings, paid-in-capital, and cash flows for the years
ended September 30 , 1996 and 1995 and 1994.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of the company's management.  My responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An au dit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.  I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my
opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
 material respects, the financial position of Hynes & Howes Insurance
 Counselors, Inc. at September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its
 operations and its cash flow for the years ended September 30, 1996, and 1995
 and 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.





                                 Everette E. Wilson
                                 Certified Public Accountant

November 20, 1996
#### Robert Duane FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. KNOWLES, Warden and Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 09-15551.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed April 25, 2011.

Walter K. Pyle, Berkeley, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Robert Duane Franklin, Vacaville, CA, pro se.

Krista Leigh Pollard, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

Robert Duane Franklin’s petition for panel rehearing is granted. The memorandum disposition filed on January 10, 2011, is withdrawn. A new memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

The court is in receipt of appellant’s pro se petition for rehearing en banc, dated January 24, 2011, and appellant’s pro se motion to take judicial notice, dated January 24, 2011. Because appellant is represented by counsel, only counsel may submit filings.

The Clerk shall serve copies of appellant’s pro se petition and pro se motion on appointed counsel of record, Walter K. Pyle.

In addition, the Clerk shall serve copies of this order and the new memorandum disposition directly on appellant.

A petition for rehearing, if any, is due within 14 days of the filing date of the new disposition.

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Robert Duane Franklin appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Franklin contends that the district court erred in dismissing his petition as untimely because proceedings before the state court sufficiently tolled the statute of limitations. Even if Franklin’s petition was timely, the state court’s rejection of Franklin’s due process claim was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). California prisoners do not *778have a protected liberty interest in earning work time credits. *See Toussaint v. McCarthy,*801 F.2d 1080, 1094-95 (9th Cir.1986) (concluding California Penal Code § 2933 “does not create a constitutionally protected liberty interest”); *Kalka v. Vasquez,*867 F.2d 546, 547 (9th Cir. 1989) (finding appellant’s due process challenge concerning his accrual of work time credits foreclosed by Toussaint). To the extent Franklin’s claims concern other credits which do implicate a protected liberty interest, the state court’s interpretation of California law was not “so unexpected as to violate due process.” *See Gollehon v. Mahoney,*626 F.3d 1019, 1023 n. 5 (9th Cir.2010); *see also Estelle v. McGuire,*502 U.S. 62, 67-8, 112 S.Ct. 475, 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**32.2           Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

	In connection with the Annual Report of Shallbetter Industries, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry Wong, President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

By: /S/ TERRY WONG 	Terry Wong, President

	Date: February 3, 2005
# CE2010285EN.01012701.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 285/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 285/127

---

Tuesday 24 November 2009Protocol on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations *

P7_TA(2009)0081

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Protocol on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations (COM(2009)0081 – C6-0101/2009 – 2009/0023(CNS))

2010/C 285 E/30

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2009)0081),

having regard to Articles 61(c) and 300(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0101/2009),

having regard to Rules 55 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0062/2009),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 **Clickable
        Enterprises, Inc.**
 **Certification
        Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Guy
        Pipolo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 This
        Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
        purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
 
 *Date:
          August 30, 2007*
  */s/
          Guy Pipolo*
 *Guy
          Pipolo*
 *Chief
          Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)*
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     November 13, 2006/s/ Neil ChristiansenNeil ChristiansenChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10074]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  11:00 a.m., Friday, May 4, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-10074 Filed 4-19-01; 11:23 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### Joseph Bush et al., Respondents, v Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants-Respondents.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance -with the following memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that the damages awarded are excessive. We grant a new trial on the issue of damages only unless, within 20 days after the service of a copy of the order to be entered herein, plaintiffs stipulate to a reduction in the verdicts to $1,500,000 for plaintiff Joseph Bush and to $300,000 for plaintiff Betty Bush. (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J. — jury award.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**StratusServices Group, Inc.Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Stratus Services Group, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Michael A. Maltzman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  February 17, 2004 | By:    | /s/  Michael A. Maltzman |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                                |   | Michael  A. Maltzman     |
|                                |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Barbara J. Dreyer, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Barbara J. DreyerBarbara J. Dreyer, Treasurer
     and Principal Financial OfficerMarch 17, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0310

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GALEN LEWIS HAWK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 4, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 26 2022

01/26/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0310