alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# President Biden Signs Legislation To Investigate Major Fires

The Empowering the U.S. Fire Administration Act authorizes the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) to send incident investigators to conduct on-site investigations of large-scale or remarkable fires.

**Posted: Dec. 27, 2022**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Fire investigation

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

On Dec. 20, 2022, President Biden signed the Empowering the U.S. Fire Administration Act to amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974. The act authorizes the USFA to send incident investigators such as safety specialists, fire protection engineers, codes and standards experts, researchers, and fire training specialists to conduct on-site investigations of large-scale or remarkable fires (major fires).

USFA will coordinate major fire investigations with appropriate federal, state and local authorities. Investigations may include the examination of the determined cause and origin of the fire and an assessment of broader systematic matters such as fire dynamics, smoke movement and structural component failures.
> 
This is an opportunity for USFA to engage in telling the story about fire safety components that could have been preventive or changed the negative outcomes from major fires like the use of sprinklers, self-closing doors and general adherence to building codes.
Dr. Lori Moore-Merrell, U.S. Fire Administrator, USFA

Following an investigation, the USFA will issue a public report on the findings or collaborate with another investigating federal agency on that agency's report. The report may include recommendations on:
            - Other buildings that have similar fire risks.
            - Improving fire department tactical response to similar fires.
            - Improving the public's fire safety practices.
            - Assessing the costs and benefits to the community of adding fire safety features.
            - How to mitigate the causes of the fire.

The USFA will issue a draft regulation for public comment to implement the requirements of the act. It will include a definition for the term “major fire.”
ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22 -0116 IN THE MATTER OF D.P., A.P., and A.P, Youths in Need of Care **ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE** Upon consideration of Appellant Mother D.M.P.’s, Motion to C onsolidate, and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant’s m otion is GRANTED and Cause Nos. DA 22 -0116, DA 22 - 0117 and DA 22 -0118 are hereby consolidated under Cause No. DA 22 -0116 and henceforth captioned as above.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 28 2022

04/28/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SHUN DA CLOTHES, INC.,

 Respondent

 v.

DENIM NEW YORK, INC.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 279 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
##### In this section

              - Codes and standards (5)
              - CRR (10)
              - Events (4)
              - Leadership (8)
              - Wildfire and WUI (16)
              - Planning (11)
              - Data (8)
              - EMS (16)
              - Equipment and technology (17)
              - Fire investigation (6)
              - Funding (5)
              - Hazmat (14)
              - Health and safety (38)
              - Terrorism (4)
              - Training (6)

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- Leadership
- Planning
USFA and OSHA presentation on the emergency response notice of proposed ruling

Infogram

- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Wildfire and WUI
Preliminary After-Action Report: 2023 Maui Wildfire

Current Issues

- Events
- Leadership
The U.S. Fire Administration celebrates Black History Month

Infogram

- Health and safety
- Leadership
The transition to advanced encryption standard

Current Issues

- Funding
- Leadership
USFA releases new manual on retention and recruitment

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
America Burning: 50 years of fire safety and prevention

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
EMR - ISAC: Making vital, timely, actionable emergency services sector information easily accessible

Current Issues

- Events
- Leadership
Celebrating Pride Month
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP-00-500-002]

Take notice that on April 10, 2001, Chandeleur Pipe Line Company (Chandeleur) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, proposed to become effective April 1, 2001.

First Revised Sheet No. 73

Chandeleur states that the purpose of this filing is to implement specific negotiated rate transactions as provided for by the Commission's Policy Statement on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines.

Chandeleur Pipe Line Company further states that copies of the filing have been mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party                           ( print page 20649)                        must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm*.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10035  Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 99.8  SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION  (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)   In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of Hydrogenics Corporation
(the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission)
on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Gary
Brandt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:  (1)the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.   By:
  /s/
  Gary BrandtName: Gary BrandtTitle: Chief Financial
  OfficerDate: March 31,
  2005   A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will be
retained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Alliance  Towers,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: May 14, 2004                            By: Michael Delin
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Michael Delin
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Alliance  Towers,  Inc.
and will be retained by Alliance  Towers,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       31
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




Date:  May  20,  2003               /s/Neil  Christiansen
                                    -------------------------
                                    Neil  Christiansen
                                    Chief  Executive  Officer
                                    Chief  Financial  Officer
99.4

Deloitte & Touche Company Logo Here

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Two Hilton Court
P.O. Box 319
Parsippany, New Jersey 07054-0319

Tel: (973) 683-7000
Fax: (973) 683-7459
www.us.deloitte.com


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Cendant Mortgage Corporation

We have examined management's assertion about Cendant Mortgage
Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2000 included in the accompanying
management assertion. Management is responsible for Cendant Mortgage
Corporations's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
Cendant Mortgage Corporations's compliance with minimum servicing
standards and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Cendant Mortgage
Corporation complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2000 is fairly stated, in
all material respects.


/s/: Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 9, 2001


Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu



<PAGE>


Cendant Mortgage Company Logo Here

Cendant Mortgage
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mount Laurel, NJ  08054



As of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, Cendant Mortgage
Corporation(the Company) has complied in all material respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Banker's
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period, the Company had
in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount
of $110 million and $20 million, respectively.


Cendant Mortgage Corporation


/s/: Terence W. Edwards
     Terence W. Edwards
     President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/: Martin Foster
     Martin Foster
     Vice President - Servicing Management Group
#### SIMMONS v. STROMBERG-CARLSON TELEPHONE MFG. CO.†

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

October 29, 1913.)

No. 2468.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia; Wm. T. Newman, Judge. Suit in equity by the Stromberg-Carlson Telephone Manufacturing Company against C. Jerome Simmons. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

For opinion below, see 199 Fed. 256.

James L. Anderson and Robt. C. Alston, both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Orville A. Park, E. P. Johnston, and Geo. S. Jones, all of Macon, Ga., for appellee.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the large record in this case in the light of the very able arguments and briefs submitted on hearing, and we conclude that the case was properly ruled and decided in the lower court The decree, therefore, should be and the same is hereby affirmed.
FOR RESIDENTS WHO ALREADY HAVE ALARMS 

OR WILL GET THEM SOON:

• Test smoke alarms every month; you can ask 

someone to test them for you.

FOR RESIDENTS WHO DO NOT HAVE ALARMS 

(AND ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE THEM): 

• A smoke alarm warns you when it senses smoke in 

your home. Put smoke alarms in your home and 

test them each month.

FIRE SAFETY MESSAGES:

• Know two ways out of every room. 

• Never smoke when you are lying down, drowsy, 

or in bed.

• Keep an eye on what you fry. Stand by your pan 

when cooking at high temperatures.

• Keep space heaters 3 feet away from anything 

that can burn, including you.

• Have a professional clean and inspect your 

fireplace, wood stove or coal stove once a year. 

KEY EDUCATIONAL MESSAGES

Fire Safe Seniors

U.S. Fire Administration
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6454 

To repeal provisions of the recently enacted health care reform law that 

prohibit health coverage rescissions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal provisions of the recently enacted health care 

reform law that prohibit health coverage rescissions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Health Insurance 

5 Protects America—Can’t Repeal IT (HIPA–CRIT) Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROHIBITION 

7 ON RESCISSIONS. 

8 The provisions of the Patient Protection and Afford9 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148), insofar as such Act 

10 under section 2712 of the Public Health Service Act (42 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6454 IH

1 U.S.C. 300gg–12) prohibits a group health plan and a 

2 health insurance issuer offering group or individual health 

3 insurance coverage from rescinding such plan or coverage 

4 with respect to an enrollee once the enrollee is covered 

5 under such plan or coverage involved and requires prior 

6 notice to an enrollee before such a plan or coverage is can7 celled, are hereby repealed, effective as of the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

             STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Anthony J. Patti, is the Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mystic Financial, Inc. (the
"Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by
the Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
            (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

      B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the
Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the
Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It
is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302
has been provided to Mystic Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Mystic
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


November 14, 2003                      /s/Anthony J. Patti
-----------------                      -------------------
Dated                                  Anthony J. Patti


<PAGE>
#### Bigman Associates, Inc., Appellant, v Stephen Fox et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated August 27, 1985, which dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On November 1, 1983, the plaintiff, a real estate broker, entered into a written brokerage agreement with the defendants whereby the defendants agreed to pay the plaintiff a commission of 8% of the selling price "in the event that the property * * * is sold or exchanged during the term of this contract” or "in the event a purchaser is obtained, ready, willing, and able to purchase the property upon the above terms [a selling price of $77,500] or upon such other terms as accepted by me [the defendant sellers]”. Thereafter, on November 10, 1983, the defendants entered into a written contract to sell the subject premises to purchasers obtained by the plaintiff. By one of its express terms, the contract was made contingent upon the purchasers’ procurement of a mortgage. In the event that the purchasers failed to obtain a mortgage commitment by December 10, 1983, either party could terminate the agreement. In fact, the sale was never consummated, because the purchasers failed to secure a mortgage commitment within the time provided by the contract.

Under these circumstances, we conclude that the complaint was properly dismissed. Although a broker is generally entitled to a commission when he produces a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase the subject property on terms acceptable to the seller *(see, Graff v Billet,*101 AD2d 355, *affd*64 NY2d 899; *Lane-Real Estate Dept. Store v Lawlet Corp.,*28 NY2d 36; *Hecht v Meller,*23 NY2d 301; *Levy v Lacey,*22 NY2d 271), the broker’s right to a commission may be varied by agreement *(see, Graff v Billet, supra,*at 356). Here, the brokerage agreement provided, in pertinent part, that the defendants would be obligated to pay the commission if a purchaser was obtained who was ready, willing and able to purchase the property upon terms acceptable to the sellers. The terms of sale acceptable to the sellers included a provision in the contract of sale making the transaction contingent upon the purchasers’ acquisition of a mortgage commitment by a date certain. Thus, the broker’s entitlement to a commission became contingent upon the purchasers’ procurement of financing by that date, and when the purchasers failed to obtain such financing, the contract was terminated, and the purchasers were no longer ready, willing and able to purchase the *94property in question upon terms acceptable to the defendant sellers; Simply put, the condition in the brokerage agreement triggering the plaintiff broker’s right to a commission was not met. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.