alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
VISION CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 4,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINACIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                           9,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                       398
<INVENTORY>                                      8,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,359
<PP&E>                                           8,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,982
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,392
<SALES>                                         10,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,529
<CGS>                                            5,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    14
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                       499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Stephen R. Wright, General Manager and Secretary of Pro-Fac
Cooperative, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pro-Fac
Cooperative, Inc.



Dated:   September 26, 2003                    /s/ Stephen R. Wright
         ------------------                    ---------------------------------
                                               General Manager and Secretary
                                               (Principal Executive Officer and
                                                Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**UNOVA, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

# **CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael E. Keane,certify that:

 

1.          Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of UNOVA, Inc.;

 

2.          Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.          Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)         Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)        Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)         Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)         Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)        Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 9,  2004 |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ Michael E.  Keane        |   |
| Michael E. Keane             |
| Chief Financial  Officer     |

 

----
Order filed February 25 , 2014

In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01

- 13

- 00768

- CR

____________ DARRYL THOMAS REED , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1326043



### ORDERThis court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State ’ s Exhibit 50

.
The clerk of the 177th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk o f this court the original of State ’ s Exhibit 50 , on or before M a rch 6, 2014

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State ’ s Exhibit 50 , to the clerk of the 177th
District Court.

PER CURIAM
A92A1472.

#### THE STATE v. MEDLEY.

(422 SE2d 677)

Decided September 8, 1992.

*Gerald N. Blaney, Jr., Solicitor, Jessica R. Towne, Assistant Solicitor,*for appellant.

*Harrison & Harrison, G. Hughel Harrison, Samuel H. Harrison,*for appellee.

Johnson, Judge.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the applicable statutory provisions, we conclude that the application for an interlocutory appeal was improvidently granted. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-2, the grant of a motion to suppress is directly appealable and not subject to interlocutory review. See *State v. Blosfield,*165 Ga. App. 111 (299 SE2d 588) (1983).

The state also filed a notice of appeal while the application for interlocutory appeal was pending. If that notice of appeal was in response to the grant of the interlocutory appeal it was filed prior to the entry of the order granting the application and was therefore premature. If that notice of appeal was intended to be a notice of direct appeal, in the event the application for interlocutory appeal was denied, it was too late in that it was filed more than 30 days after the entry of the trial court’s order and was therefore untimely. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Carley, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.*
**EXHIBIT 10.25**

 

December 18, 2001 

 

Mr. Paul V. Dufour 

1140 Hidden Ridge, #2223 

Irving, TX 75038

 

Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2000.

 

Dear Mr.Dufour: 

 

Please refer to the Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2000 among IMCORecycling Inc., IMCO Management Partnership L.P. and you. Capitalized terms not defined in this amendment (the “Amendment”) shall have the respective meanings assigned to those terms in the Employment Agreement. The parties hereto desireto amend the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement as follows: 

 

1. Section 5.3(c) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and substituted in lieu thereof is the following new Section 5.3(c), to read as follows: 

 

“(c) The Company, in its sole discretion, may terminate the Executive’s employment by giving himnot less than thirty (30) days advance written notice of the termination. A termination by the Company under this Section 5.3(c) or written notice by the Company that it has decided not to extend the term of this Agreement pursuant to Section 1.2shall be referred to for all purposes as being “Terminated Without Cause.” 

 

2. The first sentence of Section 6.1(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and substituted in lieu thereof is the following new sentence: 

 

“(b) If the Executive resigns or terminates hisemployment for any reason or the Executive’s employment is terminated by the Company at any time during the Term of this Agreement or the Company fails to extend the term of this Agreement pursuant to Section 1.2, the Company and the Executiveexpressly agree that the Executive will be retained by the Company for a twenty-four month period following the termination of his employment to provide services in an advisory and consulting capacity and to prevent any other business competitivewith IMCO, the IMCO Group or the Company from securing his services and utilizing his experience, background and expertise.” 

Paul V. Dufour 

December 18, 2001 

Page 2 

 

Except as expressly modified by the terms of this Amendment, all other terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force andeffect for all purposes. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of the Amendment and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement.

 

If the foregoing accurately sets forth your understanding withregards to the subject matter hereof, please sign and return one of the enclosed counterparts of this Amendment, whereupon this Amendment shall become a binding agreement among the parties. 

 

Very truly yours,

 

**IMCO Recycling Inc.; and**

**IMCO Management Partnership L.P. (by its**

**General Partner, IMCO Recycling Inc.)**

By:
 
 
  
Don V. Ingram

**President**

 

AGREED ANDACCEPTED 

effective as of the day and year first above written. 

 

**Employee**

 

Paul V. Dufour
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6474 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to cease construction of a temporary 

causeway in connection with the project for the Renard Island Confined 

Disposal Facility, Green Bay Harbor, Wisconsin, until certain conditions 

are met, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2010 

Mr. KAGEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to cease construction 

of a temporary causeway in connection with the project 

for the Renard Island Confined Disposal Facility, Green 

Bay Harbor, Wisconsin, until certain conditions are met, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RENARD ISLAND CONFINED DISPOSAL FACIL4 ITY, GREEN BAY HARBOR, WISCONSIN. 

5 The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 

6 of Engineers, shall immediately cease construction of a 

7 temporary causeway in connection with the project for the 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6474 IH

1 Renard Island Confined Disposal Facility, Green Bay 

2 Harbor, Wisconsin, being carried out under section 123 

3 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 1293a), 

4 until such time as the Secretary— 

5 (1) conducts a review of all bids submitted for 

6 construction of the Renard Island Temporary Cause7 way, Final Cover and Grading element of such 

8 project; and 

9 (2) submits to the Committee on Transpor10 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Represent11 atives and the Committee on Environment and Pub12 lic Works of the Senate a report on the results of 

13 such review. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS TURNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 288 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1






                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Nonqualified Stock Option Plan of IMCO Recycling Inc.
(Form S-8 No. 33-26641), the IMCO Recycling Inc. Amended and Restated Stock
Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-34745), the IMCO Recycling Inc. 1992 Stock Option
Plan (Form S-8 Nos. 333-76780, 333-00075, and 333-71339), the IMCO Recycling
Inc. Annual Incentive Program (Form S-8 Nos. 333-07091 and 333-71335), the IMCO
Recycling Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-81949), and the
2000 Restricted Stock Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-55962) of our report dated January
31, 2001, with respect to the financial statements of IMCO Recycling included in
the Annual Report (10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.






                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP





March 20, 2001
Dallas, Texas
| 1.     | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | the      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |

| Dated:  September      18, 2008 |                                       |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                      | By:  /s/ Joseph J.      Raymond  |
|                                      | Joseph      J. Raymond                     |
|                                      | Chairman      of the Board of Directors,   |
|                                      | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 02-13

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGE

O R D E R

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), may recall

Senior Judges of the Court who have retired but who have agreed to be available for such recall

when their service is needed by the Court, and

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Senior Judge

Kenneth B. Kramer would provide substantial service necessary to meet the needs of the Court, and

WHEREAS Senior Judge Kramer has consented to be available for recall as needed by the

Court,

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that, effective August 1, 2013, Judge Kenneth B. Kramer is recalled from retired

status to have and to exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active

service and to otherwise perform substantial service with the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. 

Judge Kramer shall serve until the Chief Judge of the Court determines that his service is no longer

needed or until August 31, 2013, whichever is sooner.

DATED: August 1, 2013 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge
**U.S. Navy Marksmanship Menu**

                    - Marksmanship Home
                    - Leadership                        - Officer in Charge
                      - Atlantic Coast Director
                      - Pacific Coast Director
                      - Action Shooting Director
                    - Team Members
                    - Upcoming Matches
                    - Achievements

**Lt. Cmdr. Jeremy Lightner**Lt. Cmdr. Jeremy Lightner is a Florida native and enlisted in the Navy in 2004. During his enlisted career, he served as an aviation medical technician at Naval Hospital Corpus Christi and operationally with Marine Heavy Helicopter Squadron (HMH) 465 in Al Asad, Iraq between 2006 and 2007. He received his commissioned in 2011 and is a graduate of Texas A&M University. Following his initial officer training, Lt. Lightner was assigned to Naval Hospital Jacksonville, Florida as a nurse corps officer. Ashore, he served as an emergency nurse at Naval Hospital Jacksonville, Naval Hospital Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and as a medical officer recruiter for Navy Recruiting Command Jacksonville, Florida.Lt. Lightner is currently assigned to Portsmouth Naval Medical Center in Virginia. He began competing in 2011 and professionally in 2013. In 2018, Hospital Corpsman 1st Class Shawn Buxton and Lt, Lightner developed the U. S. Navy Marksmanship Team (Action Component).Lt. Lightner assumed his duties as director of Navy Action Shooting in May 2018

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      29,506,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,557,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,230,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,890,000
<PP&E>                                      11,281,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,397,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,146,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,407,000
<BONDS>                                        599,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,772,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,119,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,146,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            61,323,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,686,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,475,000)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,045,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   366,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            679,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   679,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
<FN>
<F1>Comprised of $1,529,000 of Interest Income and $54,000 of Exchange Loss.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-20 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05730-BSJ Document 12-20 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 9, 2009 

jm 

Order 

 

June 9, 2009 

139019 (19) 

RONALD SEATON, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139019 

 COA: 289166 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $1.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$374.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.