alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of
American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
          December 31, 2004, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit
          32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  April 15, 2005           /s/  Andrew P. Calerich
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8
No. 333-146927, 333-128143, 333-118158, 333-118156, 033-79996, 333-43389, 333-09559) pertaining to the Axsys
Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and Axsys Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan and Trust of our reports dated February 16,
2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Axsys Technologies, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Axsys
Technologies, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
Ernst & Young, LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
February 16, 2009

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 
  (1)
    
    The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ JONATHAN T. COHENJonathan T. CohenVice President and Chief Accounting OfficerDate: November 19, 2007
#### DITMAS v. HITCHINGS et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

May 14, 1894.)

Action by Joana Ditmas against Hector M. Hitchings and another.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and CULLEN, JJ.

No opinion. Reargument ordered.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terry Thomas, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), rendered on January 9, 1984, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel Hertz to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
## Secondary Navigation

About USDA
-  Our Secretary 
-  Secretary's Public Schedule 
-  Our Deputy Secretary 
-  Budget 
-  History 
-  Laws and Regulations 
-  Mission Areas 
-  Performance 
-  Bipartisan Infrastructure Law 
-  Inflation Reduction Act 

Agencies

Careers

Employee Services

Farm Bill

Future of Work

Initiatives

Staff Offices

# About the U.S. Department of Agriculture

## What We Do

We provide leadership on food, agriculture, natural resources, rural development, nutrition, and related issues based on public policy, the best available science, and effective management.

We have a vision to provide economic opportunity through innovation, helping rural America to thrive; to promote agriculture production that better nourishes Americans while also helping feed others throughout the world; and to preserve our Nation's natural resources through conservation, restored forests, improved watersheds, and healthy private working lands.

Our strategic goals serve as a roadmap for the Department to help ensure we achieve our mission and implement our vision.
          - USDA's Strategic Goals for FY2022-2026  (PDF, 9.6 MB)

 

## Who We Are

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is made up of 29 agencies and offices with nearly 100,000 employees who serve the American people at more than 4,500 locations across the country and abroad.
          - Our Secretary
          - Secretary's Public Schedule
          - Agencies
          - Mission Areas
          - Organization Chart  (PDF, 306 KB)  	 

## How We Work

The core values described in our strategic plan provide our workforce with direction and goals along with milestones that we use to measure our progress, and help to guide decisions about our budget, programs and services.
          - Budget
          - Performance and Accountability  	 

## Our Vision

When President Lincoln established the United States Department of Agriculture, he called it the “People's Department." At USDA we are working tirelessly to be a model department that serves all people of our great Nation. This video captures the ways USDA touches the lives of everyday Americans -- today, tomorrow, and every day -- as we take steps toward a brighter future.

 

## Our History

On May 15, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln signed legislation to establish the United States Department of Agriculture and two and a half years later in his final message to Congress, Lincoln called USDA "The People's Department." Through our work on food, agriculture, economic development, science, natural resource conservation and other issues, USDA has impacted the lives of generations of Americans.
          - USDA 150 Years
          - Former Secretaries
          - History of American Agriculture 1776-1999  (PDF, 3.0 MB)
#### Sunrise Plaza Associates, Appellant, v International Summit Equities Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*for a judgment declaring whether a proposed addition to a shopping center would create an "obstruction” in violation of a restrictive covenant, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated August 12, 1988, which, *inter alia,*declared that the proposed construction did not violate the restrictive covenant, vacated a preliminary injunction, and denied the plaintiff’s request for a permanent injunction.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The central issue at bar concerns the application, if any, of a restrictive covenant to the respondent’s proposal to construct a building and pedestrian walkway on its premises. The respondent and the plaintiff each own adjacent, separate parcels of land containing stores, parking and automobile access ramps. Together, the parcels comprise a strip shopping center in which customers have free access to cross back and forth between the two parcels. The restrictive covenant, by its terms, states that, "no obstruction shall be erected between the adjacent 'common areas’ of [the plaintiff’s and the respondent’s properties]”. We agree with the Supreme Court that the respondent’s proposal for construction did not constitute an "obstruction” as contemplated by the covenant.

It is well settled that "the policy of the law is to favor the free and unobstructed use of realty * * * and that covenants restricting the use of property will be strictly construed against those seeking to enforce them” *(Huggins v Castle Estates,*36 NY2d 427, 430). The party seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant must establish a violation by clear and convincing proof *(see, Huggins v Castle Estates, supra,*at 430). Moreover, where the language used in a restrictive covenant is equally capable of two interpretations, the less restrictive interpretation must be adopted *(Thrun v Stromberg,*136 AD2d 543).

The covenant at bar did not prohibit construction on either of the adjacent parcels of land. In fact, the covenant actually contemplated the possibility of future construction. We hold, as the trial court did, that the covenant, which prohibited "obstructions” from being erected, was intended to restrict the parties from erecting a barrier which would prevent the free flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic between the adjoining parcels. It is clear that the defendant’s proposed construction would not constitute such an "obstruction”. The plaintiff’s *562other contention is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of Telecommunications Income Fund XI, L.P. as of
June 30, 1999, and the six months ended June 30, 1999, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         337,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,391,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (147,189)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             613
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,582,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          509,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,072,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,582,379
<SALES>                                        403,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               403,579
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               114,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                61,742
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                222,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            222,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   222,506
<EPS-BASIC>                                      29.35<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    29.35<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Net Income (Loss) per Partnership Unit
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford K. Bown,
certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended on March 31, 2007, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Clifford K. Bown   
|Clifford K. Bown       
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 9, 2007
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT 

 

Metal Transport

V. 1:07-cv-5726

 Centramet Trading

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled action is

reassigned to the calendar of

JUDGE CASTEL

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk’s Office of

the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge’s initials after the case

number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 6/25/2007

By: Janeen Miles

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cv-05726-PKC Document 11 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11106]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,243]


COLOR-TEX International, North Carolina Finishing Division, 
Salisbury, NC; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding 
Application for Reconsideration

    By letter of February 4, 2001, a petition requested administrative 
reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Negative Determination 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
applicable to workers of the subject firm. The negative determination 
was signed on January 12, 2001, and published in the Federal Register 
on February 8, 2001 (66 FR 9599).
    The Department's review of the application shows that the 
information provided supports additional survey of the subject firm 
customers.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of April 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-11106 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 43 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 43 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04511-AKH Document 43 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### PULTZ, Respondent, v. MILLER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

May 14, 1894.)

Appeal from Dutchess county court

Action by Charles R. Pultz against William Starr Miller.

Esselstyn & McCarty, for appellant

A. Lee Wager, for respondent.

*1115DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Dutchess county, affirming a judgment rendered in a court of a justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for $16.75 damages and costs. The action was for the recovery of $14 for work and material furnished by the plaintiff for the defendant in the erection of a building upon his premises. The house was erected or finished for the defendant by Ackert & Brown, and they ordered the work and material from the plaintiff. The work was bestowed upon the building, and the material was used in its erection. There was sufficient authority in Ackert & Brown to incur the liability for the defendant, and he had the benefit of the labor and material. There was no defense to the action, and there is no merit in the appeal. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                         201,624
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               201,624
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              20,869,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        1,083,420
<BONDS>                                                     15,166,177
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        3,704,222
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                           355
<OTHER-SE>                                                     415,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                20,869,827
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     0
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                17,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (11,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (11,322)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (11,322)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (.09)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 774 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 137
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 774

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             July 30, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 46-02 21st Street in Long Island City, New York, as the ``Geraldine 
                    Ferraro Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GERALDINE FERRARO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 46-02 21st Street in Long Island City, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Geraldine Ferraro Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Geraldine 
Ferraro Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 137

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 774

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 46-02 21st Street in Long Island City, New York, as the ``Geraldine 
                    Ferraro Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 30, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 45      Filed 07/19/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH     Document 45      Filed 07/19/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-12 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-12 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-12 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-12 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-12 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05710-RJH Document 56-12 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                      NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC.

                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                YEAR ENDED
                                                               JUNE 28, 1997
                                                              -----------------
                                                                          FULLY
                                                              PRIMARY    DILUTED
                                                              -------    -------
<S>                                                           <C>        <C>   
SHARES
Weighted Average Shares of Common Stock................        13,397     13,397
Add:
  Common Stock Equivalents in the form of Stock
  Options..............................................           246        391
                                                              -------    -------
Weighted Average Common Stock and Common Stock
Equivalents............................................        13,643     13,788
                                                              =======    =======
EARNINGS
Earnings per Consolidated Statement of Income..........       $18,649    $18,649
                                                              =======    =======
Earnings per Share.....................................       $  1.37    $  1.35
                                                              =======    =======
</TABLE>