alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MODESTO RAMIREZ and GABINA

MENDOZA,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72843

Agency Nos. A099-418-119

 A096-304-950

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Modesto Ramirez and Gabina Mendoza, natives and citizens of Mexico,

petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

FILED

OCT 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72843

denying their motion to reopen, seeking to apply for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.

Petitioners contend that country conditions have changed in Mexico, and

that they will be persecuted because they will be perceived as wealthy and potential

kidnapping victims because they are Mexicans returning from the United States,

thereby entitling them to asylum relief. Petitioners failed to establish changed

country conditions in Mexico that are material to petitioners and their

circumstances. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988,

996-97 (9th Cir. 2008). In addition, petitioners failed to establish that they qualify

as a cognizable social group, and therefore did not demonstrate prima facie

eligibility for asylum,. See Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th

Cir. 2010) (rejecting as a particular social group “returning Mexicans from the

United States”). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6530 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to establish a position for a 

representative of Indian Tribes on the Joint Board overseeing the implementation of universal service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2010 

Mr. INSLEE (for himself, Mrs. BONO MACK, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. COLE, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. DEFAZIO, and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to establish 

a position for a representative of Indian Tribes on the 

Joint Board overseeing the implementation of universal 

service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIBAL REPRESENTATIVE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 254(a) of the Commu5 nications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(a)) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘advocates.’’ and inserting ‘‘advocates, and one 

7 member of such Joint Board shall be a Commission-apVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:37 Dec 17, 2010 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6530.IH H6530

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6530 IH

1 pointed Tribal representative nominated by the Commis2 sion’s Office of Native Affairs and Policy.’’ 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 410(c) of 

4 the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 410(c)) is 

5 amended in the third and fourth sentences by striking 

6 ‘‘State’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘State, Tribal, 

7 and utility consumer advocate’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Irene A. Sillay, Appellant, v Eleanor Witty et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in memorandum decision at Supreme Court, Boehm, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J. — partial summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-1517-001]

Take notice that on April 10, 2001, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), amendments to its proposed service agreements with AXIA Energy LP for Non-Firm transmission service and Firm transmission service under FPL's Open Access Transmission Tariff.

FPL requests that the proposed service agreements become effective on March 16, 2001.

FPL states that this filing is in accordance with Section 35 of the Commission's regulations.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice                           ( print page 20974)                        and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10330  Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6399 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6399

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To improve certain administrative operations of the Office of the 
           Architect of the Capitol, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSOLIDATION OF STAFF POSITIONS.

    (a) Consolidation.--Section 108 of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 1849) is amended to read as follows:
    ``Sec. 108.  The Architect of the Capitol may fix the rate of basic 
pay for not more than 32 positions at a rate not to exceed the highest 
total rate of pay for the Senior Executive Service under subchapter 
VIII of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, for the locality 
involved.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1203(e) of the Legislative 
Branch Appropriations Act, 2003 (2 U.S.C. 1805(e)) is amended by 
striking paragraph (3).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to pay periods beginning on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS TO ACQUIRE BUILDING.

    (a) Availability.--The amounts described in subsection (b) shall be 
available to the Architect of the Capitol for the acquisition (through 
purchase, lease, transfer from another Federal entity, or otherwise) of 
real property for the use of the Capitol Police.
    (b) Amounts Described.--The amounts described in this subsection 
are amounts appropriated to, and remaining available for obligation by, 
the Architect of the Capitol under the heading ``Architect of the 
Capitol, Capitol Police Buildings and Grounds'' or under the heading 
``Architect of the Capitol, Capitol Police Buildings, Grounds and 
Security'' in any Act making appropriations for the legislative branch 
for fiscal years 2007 through 2010.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6399

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To improve certain administrative operations of the Office of the 
           Architect of the Capitol, and for other purposes.
```
Order entered February 11, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00443-CR

JEREMY KANE QUASCHNICK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-80333-2019

ORDER

This appeal was perfected on June 14, 2021. Appellant’s brief was initially 

due on September 18, 2021. We granted two extensions, making the brief due 

November 19, 2021. That same day, appellant filed a third motion for an extension 

of time which only recently came to the Court’s attention.

We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER appellant’s brief due by 

February 25, 2022. No further extensions of time will be granted absent 
extenuating circumstances. If a brief is not filed by that date, we will abate the 

appeal for a hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3).

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,608,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     635,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,650
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,056,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,187,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                97,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,699,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,073,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   309,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            764,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   764,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,610,640
<SECURITIES>                                   985,717
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,659,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,655,124
<INVENTORY>                                  3,616,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,042,209
<PP&E>                                       6,813,858
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,524,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,742,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,609,573
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,250
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,608,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,742,900
<SALES>                                     18,371,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,371,001
<CGS>                                        6,573,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,573,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,520,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               755,159
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             218,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                203,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            203,656
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (22)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,404
<PP&E>                                           5,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,123
<BONDS>                                          4,605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,099
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,063)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,764
<SALES>                                          3,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,332
<CGS>                                            2,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    17
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       111
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (254)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                         1,388,936
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,564,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                     679,163
<INVENTORY>                                    6,828,251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              21,016,629
<PP&E>                                        27,068,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,912,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                63,432,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         12,308,032
<BONDS>                                       98,642,629
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         57,621,049
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,490
<OTHER-SE>                                  (121,901,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  63,432,792
<SALES>                                        7,439,885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,439,885
<CGS>                                          2,092,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,092,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,914,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,882,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (7,180,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (7,180,221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (7,180,221)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Donald J. Zurbay, certify that:

 

- I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of St. Jude Medical, Inc.; and

- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: March 21, 2013

 

 

 

/s/ DONALD J. ZURBAY                          	

Donald J. Zurbay

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
#### Donna Farrell, Appellant, v William F. Farrell, Respondent.

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court correctly declined jurisdiction of petitioner’s custody application pursuant to the Federal Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act of 1980 (PKPA; 28 USC § 1738A). When the divorce action was commenced in Florida, that State was the home State of the child. Under its laws, Florida acquired jurisdiction to render a custody determination *(see,*Fla Stat Annot § 61.1308 [1] [a] [1]) and since the respondent continued to reside there, Florida continued to have jurisdiction to determine custody of the child of the marriage (28 USC § 1738A [d]). Under these circumstances, New York lacked jurisdiction to modify or supersede the Florida custody order (28 USC § 1738A [f]). Since the facts essential to consideration of jurisdiction under PKPA were not in dispute, a hearing was not required. Moreover, the jurisdictional provisions of PKPA preempt those of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA; Domestic Relations Law art 5-A) *(Enslein v Enslein,*112 AD2d 973, 975) and, therefore, we do not reach the issue of whether a hearing was required to determine if New York should exercise jurisdiction under the UCCJA (Domestic Relations Law § 75-d). We also do not reach the issue of whether the Pennsylvania custody order, made in the course of an abuse proceeding, would constitute an additional basis for declining jurisdiction of this petition. (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Family Court, Bersani, J.— custody.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-4478]

#### Notice of Termination of Investigation

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on January 24, 2001, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Brenner Tank, Inc., Mauston, Wisconsin.

                    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.                          ( print page 22010)    

Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of April, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-11012  Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
** **

**EXHIBIT 15**

August8, 2007

Securities andExchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C.20549

Commissioners:

We are aware thatour report dated August 8, 2007 on our review of interim financial informationof W. R. Grace & Co. (the “Company”) for the three-month and six-monthperiods ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 and included in the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, isincorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-37024,333-49083, 333-49507, 333-49509, 333-49511, 333-49513, 333-49515 and333-49517).

Very truly yours,

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

McLean, Virginia

 

----