alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”), for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald L. Rossetti, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:







1.
This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:  August 6, 2009
/s/ Ronald L. RossettiRonald L. RossettiChief Executive Officer
order does not sanction petitioner's attorney, such that the attorney could

challenge it personally through a writ petition.

Having considered the parties' arguments, we summarily deny the writ petition, as it challenges a substantively appealable order. 

### See NRAP 3A(b)(8) (permitting an appeal from a special order entered after final judgment, except for an order "granting a motion to set aside a default judgment under NRCP 60(b)(1) when the motion was filed and served within 60 days after entry of the default judgment"); 

### Lindblom v. Prime Hospitality Corp., 120 Nev. 372, 374 n.1, 90 P.3d 1283, 1284 n.1 (2004) (explaining that an order setting aside a default judgment is appealable as a special order after final judgment if the motion to set aside is made more than 60 days after entry of the judgment). In particular, real party in interest's motion for relief from the judgment was filed more than six months after entry of the judgment, and in granting the motion, the district court specifically rejected real party in interest's "excusable neglect" argument under NRCP 60(b)(1), noting that the motion was filed well beyond the six-month window for moving for such relief under NRCP 60(b)(1). While the order granting relief from the judgment based on a finding of fraud was subject to challenge by appeal, notice of that order's entry was served by mail on August 13, 2014, and petitioner did not file a notice of appeal within the 33-day appeal period. 

### See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). Instead, petitioner filed this writ petition on September 17, 2014, 35 days after the order's notice of entry was served. 

### See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224-25, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (noting that an appeal provides an adequate remedy that generally precludes writ relief, and regardless, "writ relief is not available to correct an untimely

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 19(I7A

### arraguirre

J. Douglas 

# Ova Cherry notice of appeal"). Accordingly, we decline to consider the merits of this writ petition, NRAP 21(b), and instead

ORDER the petition DENIED.

cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd. Fabian & Clendenin, P.C. (Utah) John Ohlson Nye County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 3

(0) 1947A
<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Scott  C.  Houghton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of Coyote Ventures Corp. for the year ended August 31,
2002  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Coyote  Ventures  Corp.


                         By:       /s/ Scott  C.  Houghton
                                  -----------------------
                         Name:     Scott  C.  Houghton
                         Title:    Chief  Executive  Officer

                         Date:     December  13,  2002
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”), for the period ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald L. Rossetti, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to his knowledge:







1.
            This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
  amended.






2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  February
      9, 2009
            /s/
      Ronald L. RossettiRonald
      L. RossettiChief
      Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1584

ANTOINETTE H. POSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SGT. TODD J. MCGHEE; SGT. PATRICK MERRITT, JR.; CONCORD 

POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., District Judge. (1:11-cv-00573-WO-PTS)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antoinette H. Posey, Appellant Pro Se. William L. Hill, FRAZIER 

HILL & FURY, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antoinette H. Posey appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the reasoning of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Posey v. McGhee, 

NO. 1:11-cv-00573-WO-PTS (M.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2012). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.2  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sanofi, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 6, 2013  By:
/s/ Jérôme ContamineJérôme ContamineExecutive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer (1)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanofi and will be retained by Sanofi and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  
 (1)Principal financial officer.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-KSB of Bytewatch
Technologies, Inc. for the Year Ended December 31, 2004, I, Richard Plotnikoff,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bytewatch Technologies,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
          31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for
          the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Bytewatch Technologies, Inc.

Dated:  March 31, 2005

BYTEWATCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By: /s/ Richard Plotnikoff
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
21
  SUBSIDIARIES
OF DVL
  The
Company’s only significant subsidiaries are:
 
 Professional
Service Corporation (a Delaware Corporation)
 Del Toch,
LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Corporation)
 Delborne
Land Company, LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Corporation)
 S2
Holdings, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation)
 DVL
Mortgage Holdings, LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Corporation)
 Receivables
II-A, LLC (a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation)
 Receivables
II-B, LLC (a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation)
 Delbrook
Holdings, LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Corporation)
 DVL
Kearny Holdings, LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Company)
Exhibit99.6  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I,
Gary Brandt, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F
of Hydrogenics Corporation;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:  (a)Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated
the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed
in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  (b)Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial
reporting.   Date:  March 31, 2005  /s/ Gary BrandtGary BrandtChief Financial Officer
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A                      2,294,563.05       1,346,518.21         0.00         77,653,481.79
C                        822,727.80               0.00         0.00          3,499,900.00
M1                       221,008.98               0.00         0.00          7,250,000.00
M2                       176,950.88               0.00         0.00          5,500,000.00
M3                       170,871.21               0.00         0.00          4,750,000.00
P                         13,889.88               0.00         0.00                100.00
R1                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R2                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R3                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R4                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
S                        145,833.35               0.00         0.00                  0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.22
11/13/18


WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.
10585 Santa Monica Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA  90025


November 16, 2018


Carianne Marshall
c/o Gang, Tyre, Ramer, Brown & Passman, Inc.
132 S. Rodeo Drive
Beverly Hills, CA  90212
Attn:    Donald Passman, Esq.


Dear Carianne:


Please refer to the employment agreement between Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. (“Company”) and you dated March 12, 2018 (the “Agreement”).
This letter, when signed by you and countersigned by Company, shall constitute our agreement to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.  Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.
1.Paragraph 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to provide that effective as of November 1, 2018, your annual rate of salary shall be $1,000,000.  As soon as practicable following the date on which this letter is executed in full (the “Effective Date”), Company shall pay to you an amount equal to the difference between (a) the salary that would have been payable to you if your annual rate of salary during the period from November 1, 2018 through the Effective Date was $1,000,000 and (b) the salary paid to you for such period. 
2.The following sentence is hereby inserted between the second and third sentences of Paragraph 3(b) of the Agreement:
“With respect to the 2019 fiscal year, and subject to the factors described in the preceding sentence, Company shall take into consideration your additional responsibilities and services rendered to Company during the Interim Period in determining the amount of your annual bonus for such fiscal year.”
3.The address for notices to you under Paragraph 16 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“TO YOU:











Carianne Marshall
Address on file with Company


With a copy to:


Gang, Tyre, Ramer, Brown & Passman, Inc.
132 S. Rodeo Drive
Beverly Hills, CA  90212
Attn:    Donald Passman, Esq.”


Except as expressly amended herein, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
If the foregoing correctly sets forth our understanding, please sign below and return this letter to Company.


WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.


By:     /s/ Paul Robinson_____________
Name:    Paul M. Robinson




Accepted and Agreed:


/s/ Carianne Marshall__________
Carianne Marshall








2
Exhibit
10.10


 


SHARE
TRANSFER


 


LIVE
Fund I Partners L.P., an Ontario limited partnership, for value received, does hereby transfer to LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor,
L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (the "Transferee"), the 1,725,000 Class B ordinary shares
standing in the Transferor’s name in the undertaking called LIV Capital Acquisition Corp. (an exempted company incorporated
in the Cayman Islands), to hold the same unto the Transferee.


 


 


Signed
by the Transferor


 


LIVE
Fund I Partners L.P.


 


By:
LIVE Fund I partners GP, LLC, its general partner


 


By:
Latin Idea Holdings, LLC, its sole member and manager


 


By:
/s/ Alexander Roger Rossi


 


Name:
Alexander Roger Rossi


 


Title:
Member


 


 


Date:
November 6, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0001044847
<NAME> SURREY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              79
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                        23
<INVENTORY>                                      1,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,990
<PP&E>                                           2,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,190
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           393
<OTHER-SE>                                         669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,546
<SALES>                                          3,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,724
<CGS>                                            2,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    106
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 64
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        64
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.15

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION
ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE
COOPERATIVES NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTORS

Compensation Arrangement for the Cooperatives Named Executive Officer

Following is a description of the compensation arrangement for Stephen R. Wright, the Cooperatives Named Executive Officer:

| | Stephen R. Wright |  | $200,000 annual base salary beginning July 1, 2008,
pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement with
the Cooperative.
| | ----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Compensation Arrangements for Directors

Directors of the Cooperative are paid an annual retainer. Each director who is a member-grower receives an annual retainer of $15,000, except Mr. Call, who serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Cooperative,
receives an annual retainer of $25,000. Each non-member grower director, namely Mr. Harrington Jr., Mr. Lipinski and Mr. Stotz receive a retainer at an annual rate of $40,000.



---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 663 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 663

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, as the ``Yvonne Ingram-
                    Ephraim Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. YVONNE INGRAM-EPHRAIM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 12877 Broad Street in Sparta, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Yvonne Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Yvonne 
Ingram-Ephraim Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 07-11

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGE

O R D E R

WHEREAS the Court has been receiving approximately300 Notices ofAppeal everymonth,

as well as numerous motions and other filings, and 

WHEREAS appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court deserve timelyjudicial review

and decision, and 

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1) may recall

Senior Judges of the Court who have retired but who have agreed to be available for such recall

when their service is needed by the Court, and 

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court has determined that the service of a Senior Judge

is needed by the Court and, if recalled, that Senior Judge would perform judicial duties and provide

substantial service to the Court, and 

WHEREAS Senior Judge Kenneth B. Kramer has consented to be available for recall as

needed by the Court,

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that, effective May 2, 2011, Judge Kenneth B. Kramer is recalled from retired

status to have and to exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active

service and to otherwise perform substantial service with the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. 

Judge Kramer shall serve until the Chief Judge of the Court determines that his service is no longer

needed or for a period of time not to exceed 90 days, whichever is sooner, unless extended by the

Chief Judge with the consent of Judge Kramer.

DATED: May 2, 2011 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge