alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6414 

For the relief of Angela Stefanova Boneva. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2010 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Angela Stefanova Boneva. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ANGELA 

4 STEFANOVA BONEVA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Angela Stefanova Boneva shall be eligible for issuance 

8 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 

9 of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant 

11 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 

12 status to lawful permanent resident. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6414 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Angela Stefanova 

2 Boneva enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Angela Stefanova Boneva, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6414 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Angela Stefanova Boneva 

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6451 

To repeal provisions of the recently enacted health care reform law that 

prohibit preexisting condition exclusions or other discrimination based 

on health status for children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal provisions of the recently enacted health care reform law that prohibit preexisting condition exclusions 

or other discrimination based on health status for children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fifth Health Insurance 

5 Protects America—Can’t Repeal IT (HIPA–CRIT) Act’’. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6451 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROHIBITION 

2 OF PREEXISTING CONDITION EXCLUSIONS 

3 OR OTHER DISCRIMINATION BASED ON 

4 HEALTH STATUS FOR CHILDREN. 

5 The provisions of the Patient Protection and Afford6 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148), insofar as such Act 

7 prohibits under section 2704(a) of the Public Health Serv8 ice Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–3(a)) a group health plan and 

9 a health insurance issuer offering group or individual 

10 health insurance coverage from imposing any preexisting 

11 condition exclusion with respect to such plan or coverage 

12 with respect to enrollees who are under 19 years of age, 

13 are hereby repealed, effective as of the date of the enact14 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
### 2000 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

2-29-2000 

# U S A E x R el M e r e n a v

. S mithk line B eech a m

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 98-1497

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2000

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2000 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

### R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA E x R e l M e r e n a v

. S mithk l ine Be e ch a m " (2000). 2000 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 40. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2000/40Filed April 21, 2000

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 98-1497

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. ROBERT J. MERENA

v.

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION

United States of America, Appellant

No. 98-1498

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. KEVIN J. SPEAR; THE BERKELEY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER; JACK DOWDEN

v.

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC.

United States of America, Appellant

No. 98-1499

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. GLENN GROSSENBACHER; CHARLES W. ROBINSON, JR.

v.SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC.

United States of America, Appellant

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (Dist. Ct. No. 93--cv--5974) District Judge: The Honorable Donald W. VanArtsdale n
Argued: March 5, 1999
Before: ALITO, McKEE, AND GARWOOD,* Circuit Judges
(Opinion Filed: February 29, 2000)

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION
The slip opinion in this case is amended as follows :
1. In the first sentence of Part IA of the opinion, the phrase "had adopted a scheme" is amended to read "h ad adopted the following scheme."
2. In the second sentence of Part IA of the opinion , the words "Specifically, the government suspected that" are deleted and the word "the" preceding the word "laboratories" is capitalized.
3. The paragraph indentation between the second and third sentences of Part IA of the opinion is elimin ated.

BY THE COURT:

Samuel A. Alito Circuit Judge

___________________________________________________ ______________ * The Honorable Will L. Garwood, Senior Circuit Jud ge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitt ing by designation.

2A True Copy:

Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

3
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6263 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian tribes to 

receive charitable contributions of apparently wholesome food. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian 

tribes to receive charitable contributions of apparently 

wholesome food. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF APPAR4 ENTLY WHOLESOME FOOD TO INDIAN 

5 TRIBES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170(e)(3) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as sub9 paragraph (F), and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6263 IH

1 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol2 lowing new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(E) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIAN

4 TRIBES.— 

5 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of 

6 this paragraph, an Indian tribe (as defined 

7 in section 7871(c)(3)(E)(ii)) shall be treat8 ed as an organization eligible to be a donee 

9 under subparagraph (A) with respect to 

10 apparently wholesome food (as defined in 

11 section 22(b)(2) of the Bill Emerson Good 

12 Samaritan Food Donation Act (42 U.S.C. 

13 1791(b)(2)) (as in effect on the date of the 

14 enactment of this subparagraph)) only. 

15 ‘‘(ii) USE OF PROPERTY.—For pur16 poses of subparagraph (A)(i), if the use of 

17 the apparently wholesome food donated is 

18 related to the exercise of an essential gov19 ernmental function of the Indian tribal 

20 government (within the meaning of section 

21 7871), such use shall be treated as related 

22 to the purpose or function constituting the 

23 basis for the organization’s exemption.’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6263 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 8, 2005

Ms. Sharon E. Callaway

Crofts & Callaway, P.C.

112 East Pecan Street, Suite 800

San Antonio, TX 78205-1578

Mr. Vincent L. Marable III

Paul Webb, P.C.

221 N.  Houston Street

Wharton, TX 77488

Mr. Luther H. Soules III

Langley & Banack, Inc.

745 East Mulberry , Suite 900

San Antonio, TX 78212-3166

RE:Case Number:  02-0932

Court of Appeals Number:  04-01-00160-CV

Trial Court Number:  97-CV-E-01382

Style:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION

v.

RITA L. IRACHETA, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATES OF DAVID IRACHETA, DECEASED, AND EDGAR IRACHETA, DECEASED

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  (Chief Justice Jefferson and Justice Green not sitting)

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 02-0932Page 1**
// Custom scripts file

(function ($, Drupal) {

    'use strict';

    // replace sidebar content with card content
    Drupal.behaviors.grid = {
        attach: function (context) {
            $(".card--feature-grid").click(function (event) {

                var a = $(this).children(".card__content").html();

                $(".l-sidebar__aside1 div").html(a);

                return false;
            });

            $('.feature-grid-tabs div:not(:first)').addClass('inactive');
            $('.feature-grid').hide();
            $('.feature-grid:first').show();


            $('.feature-grid-tabs .button').click(function () {
                var t = $(this).attr('id');
                if ($(this).hasClass('inactive')) {
                    $('.feature-grid-tabs .button').addClass('inactive');
                    $(this).removeClass('inactive');

                    $('.feature-grid').hide();
                    $('#' + t + '-cards').fadeIn();
                    $('#' + t + '-cards .card--feature-grid')
                        .first()
                        .each(function () {
                            $(this).click();
                        });
                }
            });

            // Select the first feature card item on page load just once
            $(".card--feature-grid")
                .first()
                .once("default-card-feature-grid-select")
                .each(function () {
                    $(this).click();
                });
        }
    }

})(jQuery, Drupal);
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the amended annual report of Cygni Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10 KSB/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  May 30, 2006

/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
# CE2010265EN.01004201.xml

| 30.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 265/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 265/42

---

Tuesday 20 October 2009Pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (codified version) *

P7_TA(2009)0041

European Parliament legislative resolution of 20 October 2009 on the amended proposal for a Council directive on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (codified version) (COM(2009)0235 – C7-0045/2009 – 2006/0250(CNS))

2010/C 265 E/20

(Consultation procedure – codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the amended Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2009)0235),

having regard to Articles 37 and 94 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0045/2009),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 – Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 86 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0032/2009),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
#### In the Matter of George Laakso, Petitioner, v Board of Education of the Hewlett-Woodmere Union Free School District et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education of the Hewlett-Woodmere Union Free School District, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of certain charges of misconduct and imposed a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

We find substantial evidence to support the factual determinations of the Hearing Officer *(see,*CPLR 7803 [4]; *Matter of Silberfarb v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs.,*60 NY2d 979; *300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176), and no basis on the record to interfere with the penalty imposed *(see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). Kunzeman, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.
(31 Abb. N. C. 46.)

#### KROOKS v. L. & C. WISE CO.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

October, 1893.)

Attachment—Directions to Sheriff—Modification of Order.

An order directing the sheriff to take possession of the attachment debt- or’s books of account, and to permit plaintiff to examine them for the purpose of discovering the whereabouts of the debtor’s property, will be modified by striking out the direction to take possession of the books, Where the sheriff states in his affidavit that he was informed that the books referred to were in the debtor’s safe, of which he did not have the combination, since such order might be construed as a direction from the court to break open the safe.

Action by Samuel J. Krooks against the L. & C. Wise Company. An attachment having been levied on defendant’s stock of goods, plaintiff procured an order directing the sheriff to take possession of the books of account of defendant, which plaintiff stated in his moving affidavit were at defendant’s place of business, and that the sheriff permit plaintiff to examine such books. • An affidavit of the sheriff was filed, on a motion to vacate said order, stating that he had seized defendant’s safe under the writ of attachment, and that he was informed that the books referred to were in said safe, but that he did not have the combination, and could not open it. Modified.

*642John H. V. Arnold, for the motion.

Blumenstiel & Hirsch, opposed.

PATTERSON, J.

The ex parte order granted on September 28th should be modified by striking out the direction to the sheriff to take into his possession the books of account. The law prescribes what the sheriff must do, and he must act or refuse to act at his peril. The order, as it stands, might well be construed as a direction from the court to break open safes, and destroy property. A new order may be entered, simply directing the sheriff to allow the plaintiff to examine any books in his possession, so far as may be necessary to discover property upon which the attachment may be levied. Settle order on notice.
See also: USFA staff directory

## Email us

        -  Admissions Office
        -  Hotel-Motel National Master List
        -  Library
        -  National Fire Academy (NFA)
        -  NFA Online
        -  National Fire Department Registry
        -  National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) Help Desk
        -  Publications Center
        -  Wildfire and WUI resources
        -  Other question or comment

## Write to us

## Call us

The best time to reach us is Monday – Friday between 8 a.m. – 4 p.m. Eastern time.

| Switchboard:                     | 800-238-3358 or 301-447-1000 |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------|
| 301-447-1035, 301-447-1441 (fax) |
| 301-447-1048                     |
| 800-638-1821 or 301-447-1030     |
| 202-646-3272                     |
| 888-382-3827                     |
| 800-561-3356 or 301-447-1189     |
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 10(29)

                    THIRD AMENDMENT TO CNA SURETY CORPORATION
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

      The CNA Surety Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan as established
effective August 1, 2000 and as heretofore amended (the "Plan") is hereby
amended as follows:

                                       I.

      Article IV is amended as follows:

      A.    Section 4.1 is hereby amended effective January 1, 2005 by adding a
      new paragraph to the end thereof to read as follows:

                  Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.1,
            each Participant's Deferral Agreement in effect on or after January
            1, 2005 shall be cancelled and no Elective Contributions shall be
            made under this Plan for any Plan Year commencing after December 31,
            2004.

      B.    Section 4.2 is hereby amended effective January 1, 2005 by adding a
      new paragraph to the end thereof to read as follows:

                  Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.2,
            no Matching Contributions shall be made under this Plan for any Plan
            Year commencing after December 31, 2004.

      C.    Section 4.5A is hereby amended effective January 1, 2004 by adding a
      new paragraph to the end thereof to read as follows:

                  Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.5A,
            no Performance Contributions shall be made under this Plan for any
            Plan Year commencing after December 31, 2003.

      D.    Section 4.5B is hereby amended effective January 1, 2005 by adding a
      new paragraph to the end thereof to read as follows:

                  Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.5B,
            no Basic Contributions shall be made under this Plan for any Plan
            Year commencing after December 31, 2004.

<PAGE>

                                      II.

Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.

Executed this ___ day of March, 2005.

                                   CNA SURETY CORPORATION

                                    By:________________________________

                                      -2-
Exhibit 10(i)


                    AMENDMENT

     This is an Amendment, dated as of April 28, 1995, to an
Employment Agreement dated January 30, 1987 between KYSOR
INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION ("Kysor") and GEORGE R.
KEMPTON ("Mr. Kempton").

                    PREAMBLE

     Following the execution of the Agreement, Kysor's Board of
Directors ("Board") approved at its April 1991 meeting the Kysor
Industrial Corporation Management Compensation Program a.k.a. the
Corporate Management Variable Compensation Program ("Program")
which replaced the prior compensation plan for management and
changed, among other things, levels of variable compensation which
could be earned if certain performance measurements were met.  In Mr.
Kempton's case as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
the Program provides for total variable compensation of 100% of Mr.
Kempton's base salary when 100% variable compensation is awarded. 
The prior plan provided for 50%.

     At the April 1995 meeting, the Board acknowledged that the
Agreement's provision for severance pay failed to be updated to reflect
the change from 50% to 100% to properly reflect the Program. 
Accordingly the Board approved the following Amendment to the
Agreement.

     1.   Severance Pay.  Paragraph 7(b)(i) of the Agreement is
          amended hereby to provide:

               (a)  monthly severance payments which shall
          continue for the term of the Compensation Period.  The
          amount of each monthly payment shall be equal to Mr.
          Kempton's monthly salary for the last full month
          immediately preceding his termination, plus one-twelfth
          (1/12) of One Hundred percent (100%) of the total salary
          paid to Mr. Kempton during the one year period
          immediately preceding his termination.

     2.   The Agreement in all other respects is not amended but
remains unchanged and the parties hereto, continue to be legally bound
by the Agreement as amended hereby.

KYSOR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION


          By:     /s/ Terry M. Murphy
	          Terry M. Murphy         
          Its:    Vice President-Chief Financial Officer              



                               /s/ George R. Kempton      
                               George R. Kempton