alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                   REPORT AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Lazare Kaplan International Inc. of our report dated August 25, 1999 included
in the 1999 Annual Report to Stockholders of Lazare Kaplan International Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Lazare Kaplan
International Inc. listed in Item 14(a)2. This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in

         1)    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-20528), Registration
               Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-37617) and Registration Statement
               (Form S-8, No. 33-57560), each of which relate to the Lazare
               Kaplan International Inc. 1988 Stock Option Incentive Plan,

         2)    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-40225), which relates
               to the Lazare Kaplan International Inc. 1997 Long Term Stock
               Incentive Plan, and

         3)    Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement (Form
               S-8, No. 333-52303), which relates to the Lazare Kaplan
               International Inc. 401(k) Plan for Savings and Investment

of our report dated August 25, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the
preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in
this Annual Report.



                                           ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                                           New York, New York
                                           August 27, 1999
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6475 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear for men. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2010 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear 

for men. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR FOR MEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6475 IH

‘‘ 9902.64.01 Work footwear for men 

with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, incorporating a protective toe 

cap of materials other 

than metal, not covering 

the ankle (provided for in 

subheading 

6403.99.60.25) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2012 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22065-22066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11015]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority 245]

Organization, Functions, and Authority Delegations; Deputy 
Secretary of State

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including the authority of section 4 of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the 
Deputy Secretary, to the extent authorized by law, all authorities and 
functions vested in the Secretary of State or the head of agency by any 
act, order, determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or 
executive order, now or hereafter issued. This delegation includes all 
authorities and functions that have been or may be delegated or 
redelegated to other Department officials but does not repeal 
delegations to such officials.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary of 
State may exercise any function or authority delegated by this 
delegation. The Deputy Secretary may, to the extent consistent with 
law, (1) redelegate such functions and authorities and authorize their 
successive redelegation, and (2) promulgate such rules and regulations 
as may be necessary to carry out such functions.

[[Page 22066]]

    This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 23, 2001.
Colin L. Powell,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-11015 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dianne Ballard, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.), rendered on November 28, 1984, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Carro, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
#### DENISON et al. v. GIFFORD et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 11, 1913.)

No. 69.

Patents (§ 301*)—Suit for Infringement—Preliminary Injunction.

Where infringement was doubtful, and the suit was not against the maker of the alleged infringing device, but against one who had sold none of them except in a single instance, when they were procured at the solicitation of an agent of complainant, a preliminary injunction was properly denied.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Patents, Cent. Dig. §§ 489-495; Dec. Dig. § 301.*

Grounds for denial of preliminary injunctions in patent infringement suits, see note to Johnson v. Foos Mfg. Co., 72 C. C. A. 123.]

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Suit in equity by Howard P. Denison and the Metal Stamping Company against John A. Gifford and Harry H. Gifford, doing business as John A. Gifford & Son. From an order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction, complainants appeal.

Affirmed.

This cause comes here upon appeal,, from an order denying complainants’ motion for a preliminary injunction. It is the ordinary suit in equity to restrain alleged infringement of United States patent No. 591,561, issued October 12, 1897, to Moyer and others for improvement in thill couplings.

W. A. Megrath, of New York City (C. C. Billings, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

D. W. Cooper, of New York City, for appellees.

Before BACOMBE, COXE, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges..

*

For other eases see same topic *&*§ íjuiiber in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The question whether or not the particular device complained of infringes any claim of this patent is by no means free from doubt; it can be more satisfactorily disposed of at the trial than in advance upon affidavits. In such case it is not the practice to discuss or dispose of such question upon application for injunction pendente lite, unless some very strong case of future irreparable injury is made out. No such case is shown here. The suit is not brought against the maker of the alleged infringing device, hut against a dealer who (except in one instance) has sold none of them, has never carried them in stock, nor offered them for sale, nor so far as the record discloses has any intention of selling any. In the single instance above referred to an agent of complainant asked defendant to send to the maker and get four of these thill couplings; the only sale defendant ever made of them was thus on complainant’s own solicitation. There seems no danger that defendant will infringe between now and the time of trial. We see no reason to alter the disposition made of the motion in the District Court.

The order is affirmed, with costs of this appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 657 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 657

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the 
            ``Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2009

Mr. Sires (for himself, Mr. Payne, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Holt, Mr. Pascrell, 
 Mr. Adler of New Jersey, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Lance, Mr. LoBiondo, 
 Mr. Andrews, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Rothman of New Jersey, and 
  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the 
            ``Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BISHOP RALPH E. BROWER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bishop 
Ralph E. Brower Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of sanofi-aventis, dated February 13, 2008 (No. 333-149203), August 2, 2007 (No. 333-145074), December 21, 2006 (No. 333-139555), June 3, 2005 (No.
333-125490), December 23, 2004 (No. 333-121584 and 333-121583) and July 22, 2003 (No. 333-107238), of our reports dated March 5, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, which appear in this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France

March 5, 2008



|                             |  |              
|---------------------------- |  | -------------
|PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit
|                             | 
|Catherine Pariset            |  | Philippe Vogt
Instructions, Form 2060 

12/23 

CERTIFICATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF CASE

Form 2060 was adapted from certificates that were in use in the bankruptcy courts. The 

certificate may be used to alert persons dealing with the debtor or property of the debtor of the 

pendency of a case under the Bankruptcy Code before the meeting of creditors notice is sent. 

Fee

There is a charge of $12 for certification.1 Bankruptcy Court Miscellaneous Fee

Schedule Item 2. This amount may be paid in cash or by check or money order made payable to

“Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court.” PLEASE DO NOT SEND CASH THROUGH THE MAIL. In

addition, many bankruptcy courts accept credit cards for payment of court fees by attorneys and 

law firms.

Instructions

Caption

1. Identify the judicial district in which the bankruptcy case was filed. Example:

“Eastern District of California.”

2. "In re": Insert the name of the debtor as it appears in the bankruptcy petition. 

3. "Case No.": Insert the bankruptcy case number assigned at the time of filing.

General Information for the Clerk

This form is for use when someone needs proof of the filing of a bankruptcy petition. 

The clerk should issue this form only upon specific application. 

1 The $12 fee is current as of December 1, 2023. Check uscourts.gov or the 

Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, which is published as an appendix after section 1930 of the Judicial 

Code (28 U.S.C. § 1930), for the current fee.
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                                                                                                                           |   |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  July 13, 2011 | /s/David K. Young                                                                                                                              |   |
|                           | David K. Young                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                           | President, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10630]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 1 and 90

[WT Docket No. 99-87; RM-9332; RM-9405; RM-9705; FCC 00-403]


Revised Competitive Bidding Authority; Correction

<BD>AGENCY: <RM>Federal Communications Commission.

<BD>ACTION: <RM>Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

<BD>SUMMARY: <RM>On January 2, 2001, (66 FR 33), the Commission 
published final rules in the Report and Order, which revised the rules 
governing which wireless telecommunications services licenses are 
potentially auctionable and its determinations of the appropriate 
licensing scheme for new and existing services. This document corrects 
the instructional paragraph.

<BD>DATES: <RM>Effective March 2, 2001.

<BD>FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: <RM>Leora Hochstein or William 
Huber, Attorneys, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless 
Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0660.

<BD>SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: <RM>The Commission published a document 
amending part 90 in the <CS>Federal Register <RM>of January 2, 2001 (66 
FR 33). This document corrects the <CS>Federal Register <RM>as it 
appeared. In rule FR Doc. 01-00040 published on January 2, 2001 (66 FR 
33), the Commission is correcting Sec. 90.179 to reflect the correct 
paragraph designation and replace text that was inadvertently omitted.

    In rule FR Doc. 01-00040 published on January 2, 2001 (66 FR 33) 
make the following correction:

PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES


Sec. 90.179  [Corrected]

    1. On page 55, in the first column, instruction number 4, and the 
regulatory text is corrected to read as follows:
    4. Section 90.179 is amended by revising paragraph (i) to read as 
follows:


Sec. 90.179  Shared use of radio stations.

* * * * *
    (i) The provisions of this section do not apply to licensees 
authorized to provide commercial mobile radio service under this part, 
including licensees authorized to use channels transferred or assigned 
pursuant to Sec. 90.621(e)(2).

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10630 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
VISION CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 2,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                  9,457
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           5,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                              246
<INVENTORY>                                             7,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       25,592
<PP&E>                                                  9,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                          3,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         46,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   6,137
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   80
<OTHER-SE>                                             32,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           46,280
<SALES>                                                37,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       37,966
<CGS>                                                  23,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          23,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        4,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           17
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           488
<INCOME-TAX>                                              267
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       221
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.03
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 22, 2010 

0114 

Order 

 

January 22, 2010 

139399 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139399 

 COA: 283577 

Cheboygan CC: 07-003645-FH 

GLENN EVAN SUNICH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10752]

[[Page 21779]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-200-1220-BY]

Notice of Closure to Motorized Vehicles

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Temporary closure order for motorized vehicle travel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that effective May 7th, 2001 certain 
public lands in Fremont County are closed to all types of motorized 
vehicle travel. The public lands are located approximately 2 miles 
northwest of Penrose, Colorado to the west of the Brush Hollow 
Reservoir. The purpose of this closure is to prevent the development of 
unauthorized user-created trails, to prevent resource damage to soils 
and vegetation, to prevent illegal dumping, and to reduce the impacts 
to wildlife. Future interdisciplinary planning will determine the 
appropriate travel routes for these areas.

EFFECTIVE DATES: These closures are effective May 7th, 2001 and shall 
remain in effect until revised, revoked or amended.

ADDRESSES: Royal Gorge Field Office, 3170 East Main Street, Canon City, 
CO 81212; Telephone (719) 269-8500.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Levi D. Deike, Field Office Manager or 
Diana Kossnar, Outdoor Recreation Planner at the address listed above 
or 719-269-8500.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The public lands affected by this temporary 
closure are identified as follows:

Sixth Principal Meridian

T.18S.,R.69W.
    Section 24, S\1/2\NW\1/4\, W\1/2\SW\1/4\, W\1/2\SE\1/4\ (240 
acres)

This closure does not apply to emergency, law enforcement, and federal 
or other government vehicles while being used for official or emergency 
purposes, or to any vehicle whose use is expressly authorized or 
otherwise officially approved by BLM. Violation of this order is 
punishable by fine and/or imprisonment as defined in 18 U.S.C. 3571. 
Notice of this closure and a detailed map will be posted at the Royal 
Gorge Field Office in Canon City.

Levi D. Deike,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-10752 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford K. Bown,
certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended on June 30, 2008, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Clifford K. Bown                                
|                                                    
|Clifford K. Bown                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 6, 2008