alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Active Power, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David S. Gino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | /s/  David S. Gino                                                  |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | David S. Gino                                                       |  | 
| |  | Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
| |  | April 24, 2003                                                      |  |
Exhibit 20.1
 
  Parcel #
    
    Square Feet (sq. ft.)CAPITAL CENTER:
    
    PARCEL SIZE
    
    DEVELOPMENT ON PARCELS2
A & B
    
    
    56,700
    
    
    17 and 19 Story Condo
Buildings307,000 gross sq. ft.2C
    
    
    35,300
    
    
    13 Story Office Building Under Construction  325,000 gross sq. ft.3S
    
    
    48,000
    
    
    13 Story Office Building235,000 gross sq.ft.3W
    
    
    35,0003E
    
    
    24,0004W
    
    
    46,0004E
    
    
    22,0005
    
    
    54,000
    
    
    8 Story Apartment Building454,000 gross sq.ft.6
    
    
    276,000
    
    
    Two 4 Story Residential Buildings Under Construction  300,000 gross sq. ft.7A
    
    
    76,000
    
    
    330 Car Public Parking Garage8
    
    
    36,000
    
    
    4 Story Office Building114,000
gross sq. ft.9
    
    
    72,000
    
    
    10 Story Office Building210,000
gross sq. ft.OUTSIDE CAPITAL CENTER:20
    
    
    26,600
    
    
    3-4 Story Historic Building
in southwest corner of lot 18,000 gross sq. ft.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,863
<SECURITIES>                                    27,762
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                       385
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,818
<PP&E>                                           3,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,715
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,054
<SALES>                                         21,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,356
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
# CE2010184EN.01026101.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/261 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/261

---

Thursday 23 April 2009Common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator ***II

P6_TA(2009)0276

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 April 2009 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC (11783/1/2008 – C6-0015/2009 – 2007/0098(COD))

2010/C 184 E/63

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council common position (11783/1/2008 – C6-0015/2009) (1),

1

having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0263),

2

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0210/2009),

| 1. | Approves the common position as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position as amended;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 62 E, 17.3.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  Texts adopted, 21.5.2008, P6_TA(2008)0217.

2

---

Thursday 23 April 2009P6_TC2-COD(2007)0098

Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 23 April 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No ...)

---
Dallas County 

Public Defender's Office 

January 31, 2018 

Ms. Lisa Matz, Clerk 

Dallas Court of Appeals 

George L. Allen, Sr. Courts Building 

600 Commerce Street, Suite 200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-4653 

RE: State ofTexas v. Rayman Villasis 

Trial Cause No: F13-341 25-N 

Appellate Cause No: 05- 16-001186-CR 

Certification of Compliance with Rule 48.4 

Dear Ms. Matz: 

Pursuant to Rule 48.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I certify that on November 

2, 2017, I sent to Mr. Villasis a copy of this Court's opinion and judgment, along with notification of 

his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review under Rule 68. This notification was sent 

certified mail, return receipt requested, to Mr. Villasis at his last known address. 

I have enclosed a copy ofthe return receipt, which for some reason does not happen to reflect 

a date of actual delivery. Please include this letter in the official papers in this cause. 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 

Enclosure 

cc: Grace Shin, Assistant District Attorney 

Regards, 

Is/ Michael R. Casillas 

Michael R. Casillas 

Assistant Public Defender 

-<f, 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., 91h Floor, LB 2 -<f, Dallas Texas 75207-4313 -<f, Phone: (214) 653-3550 -<f, Fax: (214) 653-3539 -<f, 

ACCEPTED

05-16-01186-CR

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

1/31/2018 11:02 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/31/2018 11:02:59 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
·,~SENDER: COMPLI§TE 'THIS SECTION .':·-: . Jl: > ~ •' j( • • ' , ._ f -. ,, ·A~ • • , ' • 

Ill Complete items 1, 2, and 3. 

• Print your name and address on the reverse 

so that we can return the card to you. 

• Attach this card to the back of the mail piece, 

or on the front if space permits. 

1 • Article Addressed to: 

VJllf\\Y\l r1 \ \{ .Sl · ·n;o ·ll i:21uu t'32 

} s 4( I ::tl.l u \\I \ 

J )tSICi nt1f\ . ~ , Lt \

1 \ \Ch ~ t l ~- '{ tt ~ l lL\-Ll\.t 

1111111111111111111111111 1111111 111 11 111111 111 

9590 9402 3296 7196 6335 73 

3. SeJvlce Type 

0 Adult Signature 

O,Adult Signature Restricted Delivery 

El Certified Mall® 

0 Certified Moll Reslrlctcd Delivery 

0 Collect on Delivery 

-=-2 _--::Art-:-i:-c:- le7N'""u-m7b-er-(Ti:;;ran :--s-;fe-r-;fi,..._O_m_s_e_rv..,.ic- e-;/a-;b-e-;;- /)----f ~ ~~lloct. ~~ O.elivery Restricted Delivery 

7016 2140 DODO 8772 35 27 =testricted Dclivety 

PS Form 3811. July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 

0 Priority Mnll Express(!) 

0 Reg•stered MaJITM 

o ~:W~~~red Mail Restricted 

0 Return Receipt for 

Merchandise 

0 Signature ConfirmationT"' 

0 Signature Confirmation 

Restricted Delivery 

Domestic Return Receipt
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2022

No. 04-22-00336-CV

IN RE THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On June 3, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for stay. This 

court granted the stay and ordered respondent and real parties in interest may file responses on or 

before June 22, 2022. Given the time restraints, relator represented it would file a signed copy of 

the June 1, 2022 order and a transcript of the June 1, 2022 hearing once received. Relator has not 

filed either the order or the transcript. 

We ORDER relator to file, no later than June 29, 2022, a signed copy of the June 1, 

2022 order and a transcript of the June 1, 2022 hearing. 

It is so ORDERED on June 24, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

1

 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018PA00915, styled In the Interest of P.K., a Child, pending in the 408th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez presiding.

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998             APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998             OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                             960                     960
<SECURITIES>                                    23,347                  23,347
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,865                   8,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                       898                     898
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,005                  33,005
<PP&E>                                           3,048                   3,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,233                   1,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,610                  41,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,042                  10,042
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,059                  29,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,610                  41,610
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,332                  11,854
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,903                   5,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,110                  15,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (327)                   (731)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,354)                 (8,773)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,354)                 (8,773)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,354)                 (8,773)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.40)                   (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.40)                   (.65)
        

</TABLE>
Workplace 

Fire Safety

ESCAPE

PLAN

ESCAPE

PLAN

ESCAPE

PLAN

ESCAPE

PLAN

ESCAPE

PLAN

Every year in the United States there are 16,500 

office and store fires that cause over $932 million 

in direct property damage.

Here are some tips to help prevent workplace fires, 

keep workers safe and keep businesses open. 

Employees 

should:

Eliminate fire hazards:

ĵ Check for damaged or 

overloaded electrical 

outlets, cords and 

cables.

ĵ Keep anything that can burn away 

from electrical equipment.

ĵ Never leave portable heating devices 

unattended.

Employers 

need to 

prepare for 

emergencies: Make sure smoke alarms 

and fire sprinklers are 

properly installed and 

working. 

ESCAPE

PLAN

P o s t c l e a r 

f ire escape 

p l a n s o n 

every level of 

a building.

Teach employees 

a b o u t e x i t 

locations, escape 

r o u t e s , a n d 

fire protection 

equipment.

If there 

is a fire:

Call 911.

Notify co-workers 

of the fire. 

N e v e r u s e t h e 

elevator. Walk, don’t 

run, down the stairs.

If you can’t evacuate, 

remain calm. Seal door 

gaps with jackets and 

wait at the window.

For more information on fire safety 

in a variety of workplaces, visit 

www.osha.gov.

Visit usfa.fema.gov for more free 

fire-safety resources.
EXHIBIT 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-11021 on Form S-3 dated December 22, 1986, in Registration Statement No.
33-28010 on Form S-3 dated April 7, 1989, in Registration Statement No. 33-31747
on Form S-8 dated October 30, 1989, in Registration Statement No. 33-69206 on
Form S-8 dated May 18, 1993, in Registration Statement No.333-37603 on Form S-3
dated October 9, 1997, in Registration Statement No. 333-68171 on Form S-8 dated
December 1, 1998, in the Registration Statement No. 333-79025 on Form S-8 dated
March 17, 2000, in the Registration Statement No. 33-80163 on Form S-8 dated
June 7, 1999 of Knight-Ridder, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, of our
report dated January 24, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Knight-Ridder, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


San Jose, California
March 22, 2001
Order entered September 26, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01143 - CV CLINTON ADAMS, Appellant V. CITY OF DALLAS, TEXA S, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. DC - 12 - 00321 - B 

### O RDER Before the Court is the City of Dallas’s September 15, 2014 motion to dismiss this accelerated appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a). Appellee no t e s the notice of appeal was filed outside the twen ty

- day deadline established in rule of appellate procedure 26. 1(b) but within the fifteen

- day extension period allowed under rule 26.3. See id. 26. 1(b) , 26.3. Appellee further notes that appellant has not filed an extension motion under rule 26.3 nor off ered a reasonable explanation for the late filing

. See id. 10.5(b), 26.3. W e ORDER appellant to file, no later than October 6, 2014, a n extension motion reasonably explaining why the notice of appeal was untimely filed. We caution appellant that failu re to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See id. 25.1(b), 26.2, 42.3; Garza v. Hibernia Nat’l Bank , 227 S.W.3d 233, 233 (Tex. App.

- – Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.).

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
**Exhibit 13.1****CERTIFICATIONS**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Makita Corporation, aJapanese corporation (the “Company”). does hereby certify that, to such officer’sknowledge:1. The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period endedMarch 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         Makita Corporation         By: /s/ Masahiko Goto    Name:  Masahiko Goto    Title: President and Representative Director  Date: September 28, 2007         Makita Corporation         By: /s/ Kenichiro Nakai    Name:  Kenichiro Nakai    Title: Director, General Manager of Administration Headquarters  Date: September 28, 2007
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GameTech International,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Donald Tateishi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/S/
                Donald TateishiDonald
                TateishiChief
                Financial OfficerMarch
                11, 2008
#### DISTLER v. LONG ISLAND R. CO.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

May 14, 1894.)

Carriers—Injury to Passenger—Boarding Moving Train.

One who attempts to board a moving train at a place where it slackens speed, but does not stop to receive passengers, is guilty of contributory-negligence, though the conductor called to him to get on, as such act is excused only by some coercion of circumstances.

Appeal from circuit court, Kings county.

Action by Charles Distler against the Long Island Railroad Company for injuries received by plaintiff while boarding one of-defendant’s trains. The complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before DYKMAN and PRATT, JJ.

Mirabeau L. Towns, for appellant.

W. C. Beecher, for respondent.

DYKMAN, J.

This action is based upon negligence. The plaintiff was nonsuited at the circuit, and from the judgment dismissing his complaint he has appealed to this court. As a special train upon the' defendant’s road was approaching the East New York station it slowed down for another railroad crossing, without, intending to stop at the station. It was not scheduled to stop there. As the train approached the crossing and the station, which was near, the plaintiff was waiting to board it, and the conductor called out to him to get on. As he jumped upon the step of the car it started suddenly forward, and he was thrown to the ground, and seriously injured. The plaintiff was nonsuited at the circuit, and has appealed from the judgment dismissing his complaint.

It is exceedingly hazardous to attempt to board a train upon a steam railroad when in motion. According to the law as settled in this state, it is presumably negligent, and, unless such presumption of negligence is overcome by testimony offered by the plaintiff, there can be no recovery in such a case. “To excuse such an act, and free the plaintiff from the charge of contributory negligence, there must be a coercion of circumstances which did' not leave the passenger the free and untrammeled possession of his faculties and judgment.” Solomon v. Railroad Co., 103 N. Y. 437, 9 N. E. 430; Hunter v. Railroad Co., 126 N. Y. 18, 26 N. E. 958. In this case there was no coercion of circumstances, and the presumption of contributory negligence must prevail against the plaintiff. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10804]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

April 25, 2001.

<BD>TIME AND DATE: <RM>10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 2, 2001.

<BD>PLACE: <RM>Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, 
DC.

<BD>STATUS: <RM>Closed in Part [Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10)].

<BD>MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: <RM>It was determined by a majority vote 
of the Commission that part of the Commission meeting to consider and 
act upon the following take place in closed session:
    1. Eagle Energy, Inc., Docket No. WEVA 98-123 (Issues include 
whether substantial evidence supports the judge's finding that the 
operator violated the regulations governing preshift and onshift mine 
examinations by failing to observe unsupported kettle bottoms; whether 
the judge properly concluded that the violations found were the result 
of the operator's unwarrantable failure; whether the judge properly 
imposed penalties that were double in amounts from those initially 
assessed; and whether the judge's frequent questioning of witnesses 
improperly interfered with the operator's presentation of its case and 
reflected bias).
    Any person attending the open portion of the meeting who requires 
special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign 
language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 
needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

<BD>CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: <RM>Jean Ellen, (202) 653-5629/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 01-10804 Filed 4-26-01; 12:32 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M