alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- How To Appeal 
    - Court Forms  and Fees        - Court Forms
      - Fee Schedule
      - Filing Fee 
    - Court Rules and Procedures        - Rules of Practice  and Procedure
      - Procedural Requirements for Staff Conferences
      - Internal Operating Procedures
      - Rules of Admission  and Practice
      - Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability
      - E-Filing Rules
      - Court Process
      - Court Efforts to Ensure Compliance with Court Rules 
    - Information About Practitioners        - Search List of Practitioners
      - Disciplinary Action
      - Key Points in Finding a Representative
      - Compendium of Disciplinary Grievances 
    - Orders and Opinions        - Miscellaneous Orders
      - Ceremonial Orders
      - Opinions and Full Court Orders
      - Search Decisions and Opinions
      - Recent Decisions / Opinions
      - Case Archives 
    - Active Panel Cases 
    - Stayed Cases 
    - Class Action Cases 
    - Electronic Filing 
    - Docket Search 
    - Oral Arguments        - Schedule
      - Oral Arguments via YouTube Live
      - Audio/Video
      - Oral Argument Educational Outreach 

----

### Budget Submissions

    - 2025 2024
-  2023- 2022
- 2021
- 2020 
USCAVC 16thJudicial ConferenceSeptember 19-20, 2024

Watch CAVC Oral Arguments on YouTube

Changes to Court Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability - EffectiveJanuary 10, 2024

In the News: Articles
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11004]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Postponement of Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Organ 
Transplantation

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; postponement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A notice announcing the first meeting of the Advisory 
Committee on Organ Transplantation (ACOT), Department of Health and 
Human Services (HHS), was published in the Federal Register dated April 
12, 2001 (66 FR, page 18962). This meeting, scheduled for May 1-2, 
2001, has been postponed.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is to inform the public that the 
first meeting of the Advisory Committee on Organ Transplantation 
(ACOT), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which was 
scheduled for May 1-2, 2001, has been postponed. The Secretary of HHS 
will publish a notice in the Federal Register once the date for the 
rescheduled ACOT meeting is determined. Individuals with questions 
should contact the ACOT Executive Director, Ms. Lynn Rothberg Wegman, 
M.P.A., by telephone at (301)-443-7577, by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fd3e8faf8f2fef1dff7edecfeb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eca09b898b818d82ac849e9f8dc28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>, 
or in writing at the Division of Transplantation, Office of Special 
Programs, Health Resources and Services Administration, Room 7C-22, 
Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.

    Dated: April 27, 2001.
Elizabeth M. Duke,
Acting Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-11004 Filed 4-27-01; 3:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 4180-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, T. Kendall Hunt, certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/ T. Kendall Hunt                                           
|T. Kendall Hunt                                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|August 6, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Housing Service


Notice of Availability of Funding and Requests for Proposals for 
Guaranteed Loans Under the Section 538 Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing 
Program; Correction

AGENCY: Rural Housing Service (RHS), USDA.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service (RHS) corrects a notice published 
December 26, 2000 (65 FR 81650). This action is taken to correct the 
authorized purposes of section 538 guaranteed loans by eliminating the 
requirement that acquisition loans result in the creation of new units.
    Accordingly, the notice published December 26, 2000, (65 FR 81650-
81656), is corrected as follows:
    On page 81650 in the third column, Item I, ``Purpose and Program 
Summary,'' the fourth sentence should read ``Qualified lenders will be 
authorized to originate, underwrite, and close loans for multi-family 
housing projects requiring new construction or acquisition with 
rehabilitation of at least $15,000 per unit.''

    Dated: April 17, 2001.
James C. Alsop,
Acting Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 01-10900 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-U
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 698 

For the relief of Shigeru Yamada. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Shigeru Yamada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU 

4 YAMADA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Shigeru Yamada shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 698 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Shigeru Yamada 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 698 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Shigeru Yamada shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1825

ALBA ELSY CHACON-SORTO,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney

General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

(A98-122-648)

Submitted: June 18, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Goren, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GOREN, Silver Spring, Maryland,

for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,

Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Angela N. Liang, Office of

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alba Elsy Chacon-Sorto, a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s

denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture.

We have reviewed the administrative record and the

immigration judge’s decision and find that substantial evidence

supports the ruling that Chacon-Sorto failed to establish a nexus

between any alleged persecution and a protected ground as necessary

to establish eligibility for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a)

(2006) (stating that burden of proof is on alien to establish

eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483

(1992) (same). Moreover, as Chacon-Sorto cannot sustain her burden

on the asylum claim, she cannot establish her entitlement to

withholding of removal. See Camara v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 361, 367

(4th Cir. 2004) (“Because the burden of proof for withholding of

removal is higher than for asylum—even though the facts that must

be proved are the same—an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is

necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.]

§ 1231(b)(3).”).

We also find that Chacon-Sorto fails to meet the standard

for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such

relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than
- 3 -

not that he or he would be tortured if removed to the proposed

country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2004). ChaconSorto fails to make this requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Has Updated Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria

**Posted: Feb. 22, 2024**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Codes and standards
            - Data
            - Health and safety

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has released the 6th edition of its Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Changes in this 6th edition include:
            - Data elements that were previously meant to be derived from other data systems were removed. Instead, the MMUCC now recommends linkages to existing data elements from other national data standards.
            - The MMUCC is now aligned with the National EMS Information System (NEMSIS), a national effort to standardize the data collected by emergency medical services (EMS) agencies.
            - The MMUCC now incorporates NEMSIS’ Universally Unique Identifiers, which can serve as key linkages between crash data systems and injury surveillance data systems. This data element is important to trace people receiving medical attention at the scene of the crash through the health care system and facilitate linkage of crash data with EMS data, including NEMSIS.

## Why this is important

Although all 50 states, the District of Columbia and several U.S. territories collect data about motor vehicle traffic crashes (e.g., the characteristics of the events, vehicles and people involved in the crash), there are significant differences in the way that data is reported.

The MMUCC establishes a common language for reporting in the traffic safety community.

This article is based on content in theFeb. 22, 2024 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
Priority

1=Law/reg/direc

tive

2=Missioncritical

3=Frequently 

requested

4=Other

(Some inventory 

items may fall 

into more than 

one priority. 

Assign them the 

highest priority. 

)

( )

(May select >1)

All

Agribusiness

Conservationists

Consumers

Cooperatives

Educators/Studen

ts

Landowners

Media

Parents/Caregive

rs

Producers

Researchers

Rural 

Communities

j ()

(May select >1)

All

AG=Agriculture

EO=Education/Outrea

ch

FN=Food/Nutrition

LR=Laws/Regulations

MT=Marketing/Trade

NRE=Natural 

Resources/Environme

nt

RS=Research/Scienc

e

RCD=Rural/Communit

y Development

TR=Travel/Recreation

Content Description

(Include why it was selected for 

inclusion and any site analytics 

or audience feedback/usability 

results.)

Content Status

A=Available on site

I=In Process

P=Planned

N/A=Not applicable

1 All LR OMB Circular A-130: 

Management of Federal 

Information Resources See: http://www.whitehouse.

gov/omb/circulars/a130

A

1 All LR Privacy Requirements

See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6a.shtmlRequired by law, 

A
1 All LR Security Protocols To 

Protect InformationSee: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6b.shtml

1 All LR Access for People with 

Disabilities (Section 508) See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6c.shtml

1 All LR Freedom of Information 

Act (FOIA)See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6d.shtml

A
1 All LR Information Quality 

See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6e.shtmlRequired by law, 

1 All LR Access for People with 

Limited English Proficiency See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6f.shtmlRequired by law, 

1 All LR Access for People with 

Limited English Proficiency See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6f.shtmlRequired by law, 

I 
1 All LR Priorities and 

Schedules for Posting Content See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6g.shtml

A 

1 All LR Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6h.shtml

1 All LR Government Paperwork 

Elimination Act (GPEA) See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6i.shtmlRequired by law, 

A
1 All LR Records Management

See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6j.shtmlRequired by law, regulation, Presidential 

A

1 All LR Digital Rights, 

Copyright, Trademark, and Patent Laws See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6k.shtml

1 All LR Government 

Performance Results Act (GPRA) See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6l.shtml
1 All LR Small Business 

Paperwork Relief Act See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6m.shtml

A

1 All LR Restrictions on 

LobbyingSee: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6n.shtml

1 All LR No Fear Act

See: http://www.firstgov.gov/webcontent/req6o.shtmlRequired by law, 

A
----

|   | (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /S/      Jay M. Meilstrup    |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Jay      M. Meilstrup                  |   |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer           |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| June      5, 2009                      |   |   |

----
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00218

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

48th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 048

- 319312

- 20

Before Birdwell, Kerr, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### A RK 

### C ONTRACTING 

### S ERVICES



### , LLC , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamu s , real part ies in

interest s ’ response, and relator ’ s reply and is of the opinion that relief should be

denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : July 1 2 , 2022
#### In re UNITED STATES, Petitioner.

Misc. No. 908.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 25, 2011.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in *United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation,*— U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2313, 180 L.Ed.2d 187 (2011), reversing this court’s judgment and remanding for further proceedings,

*988It Is Ordered That:

The petition is reinstated.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6475 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6475

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear for men.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2010

 Mr. Carnahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear for men.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR FOR MEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.01  Work footwear for   Free            No change       No change       On or before 12/    ''.
                     men with outer                                                      31/2012.........
                     soles of rubber,
                     plastics, leather
                     or composition
                     leather and
                     uppers of
                     leather,
                     incorporating a
                     protective toe
                     cap of materials
                     other than metal,
                     not covering the
                     ankle (provided
                     for in subheading
                     6403.99.60.25)...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



EXHIBIT 11
----------
                               DVL, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                              Computation of Per Share Data
                            (in thousands except share data)
         

                                                            December 31,         
                                               ----------------------------------
                                                  1996         1995        1994  
                                               ----------   ---------   ---------

<S>                                            <C>          <C>         <C>
Loss before gain on sales of real estate       $   (4,471)  $  (5,780)  $ (12,896)
Gain on sales of real estate to affiliates              -           -           9
                                               ----------   ---------   ---------
Loss from continuing operations                    (4,471)     (5,780)    (12,887)
Loss from discontinued operations                       -           -        (223)
Extraordinary gain on the settlement of
 indebtedness                                       8,349       7,900       1,935 
                                               ----------   ---------   ---------
Net income (loss)                              $    3,878   $   2,120   $ (11,175)
                                               ==========   =========   =========


Weighted average number of common shares
 issued and to be issued                       14,339,975   9,980,565   8,336,640

Shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive
 stock options and warrants - net of 
 shares assumed to be repurchased (at the
 average market price for the period)
 from exercise proceeds                         1,401,443           -           -
                                               ----------   ---------   ---------
Shares used for computation                    15,741,418   9,980,565   8,336,640
                                               ==========   =========   =========


Earnings per share of Common Stock:

 Loss from continuing operations               $     (.28)  $    (.58)  $   (1.54)
 Loss from discontinued operations                      -           -        (.03)
 Extraordinary gain on the settlement of
  indebtedness                                        .53         .79         .23
                                               ----------   ---------   ---------
 Net income (loss)                             $      .25   $     .21   $   (1.34)
                                               ==========   =========   =========
</TABLE>