alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,395,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  203,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      15,701,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,089,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,946,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,911,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,946,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,588,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,048,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,540,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,682,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,858,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,858,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”), for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald W. Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:







1.
This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:  May 10, 2010
/s/ Ronald W. JohnstonRonald W. JohnstonChief Financial Officer
(October 15, 1987)

#### In the Matter of Stephen R. Kihl, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

In this proceeding to discipline an attorney upon charges of professional misconduct, respondent has submitted an affidavit tendering his resignation dated May 12, 1987.

The respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this court on March 15, 1961. By a prior order of this court dated October 1, 1984 [103 AD2d 393], the respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year effective November 1, 1984. By a further order of this court dated October 31, 1984 the effective date of said suspension was *726changed to December 1, 1984. Respondent acknowledges in his affidavit that he is the subject of an investigation by the Grievance Committee and that certain allegations of misconduct are pending against him.

The misconduct alleged to have been committed by the respondent includes: offering a false instrument for filing; improperly permitting another to use his name as attorney of record; representing clients with adverse and conflicting interests; participating in an insurance fraud; settling a claim based on a fraudulent medical report; failing to report to the appropriate authorities the unprivileged knowledge that, among other things, attorneys with whom he was associated represented clients with adverse interests, filed false retainer and closing statements with the Office of Court Administration and submitted fraudulent claims to insurance carriers; and having been convicted of a "serious crime” as defined in section 90 (4) (d) of the Judiciary Law, in that, on June 27, 1986 respondent pleaded guilty to four counts of violation of Penal Law § 175.30 (offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree, a class A misdemeanor).

The respondent states that his resignation is freely and voluntarily rendered; that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress; and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation. Respondent further acknowledges that if charges were predicated upon the misconduct outlined above, he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against such charges.

Under the circumstances herein, the respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is ordered that respondent be disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law effective forthwith. Respondent’s request to have his resignation accepted retroactively to the original date of his suspension is denied. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.26 


                 SUMMARY OF 1998 SENIOR EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN


         A bonus equal to 50% of Dennis Ganster's base compensation and 40% of
the base compensation of the other senior executives is payable for the fiscal
year 1998 if the Company achieves a targeted earnings per share level.
Additional bonus amounts may be paid, at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee if the target is exceeded. Twenty-five percent of the bonus is payable
in Common Stock, valued at the lower of the closing price of the Common Stock on
February 6, 1998 or June 30, 1998, up to a maximum of 25,000 shares. The
remainder of the bonus is payable in cash. Participating senior executives must
be employed by the Company at the date of the payment of the bonus.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his
capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Colombia Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)          The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date: August 17, 2012 |  | /s/ Ronald G. Stovash                                  | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                      |  | Ronald G. Stovash, President and                       | 
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal
 Executive Officer) |
# Autism Resources for First Responders

**Posted: April 27, 2023**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - EMS

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

Autism awareness is essential for first responders because there is wide variation in the ways that those with autism may behave, communicate and interact.

Some things individuals on the autism spectrum may struggle with include emergency lights and sounds or being touched. For some individuals with autism, these can trigger anxiety and lead to outbursts that could look like noncompliance with the instructions of first responders who are trying to help.

The likelihood of a first responder interacting with a person on the autism spectrum is increasing. In a March 2023 report, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicated that the number of individuals diagnosed with autism increased between 2018 and 2020, from 1 in 44 children in 2018 to 1 in 36 children in 2020.

## Awareness resources for first responders

Information and awareness training that can assist first responders in recognizing symptoms of autism and developing best practices for interacting with those who have autism during a response are available from Autism Speaks: Autism Safety Project and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This article is based on content in theApril 27, 2023 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6424 

For the relief of Lauli’i Matu’u. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2010 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Lauli’i Matu’u. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LAULI’I 

4 MATU’U. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Lauli’i Matu’u shall be eligible for issuance of an im8 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

12 permanent resident. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6424 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Lauli’i Matu’u en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered 

4 and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 

5 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 

6 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en7 actment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Lauli’i Matu’u, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6424 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Lauli’i Matu’u shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Annual Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marshall Chadwell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/   Marshall Chadwell
----------------------------
Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
July 29, 2003
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, James R. Weaver, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in thisreport; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theregistrant and have: 

 

a)  designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; 

 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  

 

c)  disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): 

 

a)  all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b)  any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

 
| Dated: August 16, 2004 | /s/ James R. Weaver                       |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                        | James R. Weaver,  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of ITSA Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hermano Studart Lins de
Albuquerque, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Hermano Studart Lins de Albuquerque


Hermano Studart Lins de Albuquerque
Chief Executive Officer
February 21, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              9
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,615
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,780
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,395
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          17,502
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,496
<LOANS>                                        120,699
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,075
<DEPOSITS>                                     133,126
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,424
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,121
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 158,075
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,395
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  294
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    96
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,785
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,235
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,391
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,394
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       70
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 141
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    599
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         599
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.86
<LOANS-NON>                                        342
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   977
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,049
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,049
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Firefighting Foams: PFAS vs. Fluorine-Free Foams

**Posted: May 25, 2023**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Equipment and technology
            - Hazmat
            - Health and safety

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been used in aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) for fighting liquid fuel fires since the 1970s. Fluorine-free foams are foams that do not contain any PFAS. Both use the same approach to fighting liquid fuel fires.

## How they work

Firefighting foams form a “blanket” over liquid fuel that acts as a barrier preventing flammable vapors from escaping the liquid. This helps both to extinguish the fire and to prevent additional ignition of vapors. The more stable and long-lasting this foam blanket is, the more effective the foam is at containing flammable vapors and ultimately extinguishing the fire.

## The problem

Although PFAS-containing foams are more effective than fluorine-free foams, in numerous scientific studies PFAS are linked to harmful effects on humans and animals and they do not degrade naturally in the environment. In response to the negative impacts of PFAS, the Department of Defense in January 2023 issued a new performance specification for firefighting foams used by the military PDF. The specification outlines the functional requirements for firefighting foams used on military bases. These foams must be able to effectively extinguish class B hydrocarbon liquid fuel fires without containing PFAS.

## The next step

Many efforts are underway to find effective alternatives to PFAS-containing firefighting foams. However, given the rapidly evolving legislation and the urgency of the issue, researchers are hoping to find additives to existing foam formulations that can be deployed faster in the field.

For example, researchers at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, are testing and evaluating additives to enhance firefighting capabilities of commercially available PFAS-free fire suppressants for military use. To learn more about this research visit the Johns Hopkins APL website.

This article is based on content in theMay 25, 2023 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROGER RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2662

[February 1, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 2008CF011497AMB.

Roger Rodriguez, Bowling Green, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### MUMFORD, Appellant, v. CROUCH et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by William W. Mumford, as receiver, etc., against George W. Crouch and Frank P. Crouch.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.