alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 2927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-030-1220-PD; Closure Notice No. NV-030-2001-001]


Emergency Closure of Federal Lands

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that certain BLM public lands in Alpine 
County, CA, west of Foothill Road, which include the mouth of Faye 
Canyon and Luther Creek, are closed to all motorized vehicles. The 
recent opening of a Forest Service parking lot and trailhead adjacent 
to the subject BLM lands has dramatically increased the potential for 
motorized public access. This temporary closure is necessary to 
preclude potential adverse effects to soils, vegetation, cultural, 
wildlife and riparian resources.

EFFECTIVE DATES: This closure goes into effect upon publication in the 
Federal Register, and will remain in effect until the Manager, Carson 
City Field Office, determines it is no longer needed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO C0MMENT CONTACT: Arthur Callan, Outdoor 
Recreation Planner, 5665 Morgan Mill Road, Carson City, Nevada 89701. 
Telephone (775) 885-6000 or e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aacbc9cbc6c6cbc4eac4dc84c8c6c784cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0c1c3c1ccccc1cee0ced68ec2cccd8ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lands included in this closure are those 
public lands within Mt. Diablo Meridian, Sections 26 and 35, T. 12 N., 
R. 19 E. The authorities for this closure are 43 CFR 8341.2 and 8364.1. 
Any person failing to comply with the closure order is subject to 
arrest and fines in accordance with the applicable provisions of 18 USC 
3571 and/or imprisonment not to exceed 12 months. This order applies to 
all motorized vehicles excluding (1) any emergency, law enforcement or 
agency vehicles while being used for emergency or administrative 
purposes, and (2) any vehicle whose use is expressly authorized in 
writing by the Manager, Carson City Field Office.

    Dated: December 20, 2000.
John O. Singlaub,
Carson City Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-1074 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 13.1****CERTIFICATIONS**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, each of the undersigned officers of Makita Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify that, to such officer’s knowledge:1. The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31,2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Makita Corporation       By: /s/ Masahiko Goto       Name: Masahiko Goto  Title: President and Representative DirectorDate: July 7, 2006           Makita Corporation       By: /s/ Kenichiro Nakai       Name: Kenichiro Nakai  Title: Director, General Manager of Administration    HeadquartersDate: July 7, 2006
A92A1513.

#### SOUTHEASTERN AUTOMOTIVE WAREHOUSE, INC. v. McCURDY.

(422 SE2d 574)

Pope, Judge.

Plaintiff Southeastern Automotive Warehouse, Inc., extended a line of credit to Carmichael’s Automotive Warehouse, Inc. (“Carmichael’s”). The form application for the line of credit was filled out and signed by defendant Carol McCurdy, who was president of Carmichael’s. In the space provided on the application for the amount of credit requested, defendant wrote “$500 - $5000.” Also contained in the document was a paragraph stating that the undersigned agreed personally to guarantee payment for goods purchased. At the end of the document defendant signed her name on the space provided for “Signature” and on the space provided below for “Title,” defendant wrote “President.” Plaintiff supplied automobile parts to Carmichael’s and ultimately brought suit against Carmichael’s on the open account and against defendant as guarantor, praying for judgment of over $38,000. Summary judgment was granted to defendant and plaintiff appeals.

We affirm. Even if, as plaintiff argues, defendant signed the guaranty agreement in her personal capacity, defendant is discharged from the entire debt because plaintiff, the creditor, increased the guarantor’s risk by extending Carmichael’s credit beyond the credit limit agreed to in the credit application/guaranty agreement. See *West &c. Bldg. Materials of Savannah v. Liberty Mtg. Corp.,*160 Ga. App. 323 (287 SE2d 320) (1981). Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, the facts of the case now before us are distinguishable from those in *Brock Candy Co. v. Craton,*33 Ga. App. 690 (127 SE 619) (1925) (in which we held the surety, who agreed to obligate himself up to a certain amount of debt owed by the principal debtor but did not specify any limit to the credit which might be extended to the debtor, was not discharged by the creditor’s extension of credit beyond the amount guaranteed by the surety), for the same reasons we noted in the *West*opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carley, P. J., and Johnson, J., concur.*

*551Decided September 23, 1992.

*Reinhardt, Whitley & Wilmot, Robert C. Wilmot,*for appellant.

*Allen, Kelley & Sowell, D. Lynn Kelley,*for appellee.
#### George C. Manning et al., Respondents, v Thomas Eberhardt et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated at Special Term, Rath, J. (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
#### Village of Springville, Appellant-Respondent, v Amherst Construction, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Order unanimously modified on the law and defendant’s cross motion granted and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant Amherst Construction, Inc., in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term properly denied plaintiff’s application to vacate the arbitration proceeding *(see, Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs.,*64 NY2d 261, 273-274; *Faberge Inti, v Di Pino,*109 AD2d 235, 239). To effect an orderly process, however, plaintiff’s action against the multiple defendants should be stayed until completion of the arbitration *(see, Carthage Cent. School Dist. No. 1 v Reddick & Sons,*79 AD2d 883, 884). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — arbitration.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6504 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for 1 year the 

first-time homebuyer tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2010 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for 1 year the first-time homebuyer tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homebuyer Tax Credit 

5 Renewal Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER 

7 CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 36(h) of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by insert10 ing before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, or during 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6504 IH

1 the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment 

2 of the Homebuyer Tax Credit Renewal Act of 2010’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to purchases on or after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary H. Schlatter certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OraLabs Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Acts Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.





Dated November 16, 2004                                    /s/ Gary H. Schlatter
                                                           ---------------------
                                                                  President

                                       15
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6476 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6476

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear for women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2010

 Mr. Carnahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear for women.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.01  Work footwear for   Free            No change       No change       On or before 12/    ''.
                     women with outer                                                    31/2012.........
                     soles of rubber,
                     plastics, leather
                     or composition
                     leather and
                     uppers of
                     leather,
                     incorporating a
                     protective toe
                     cap of materials
                     other than metal,
                     not covering the
                     ankle (provided
                     for in subheading
                     6403.99.90.15)...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,156
<SECURITIES>                                     4,897
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                       444
<INVENTORY>                                      1,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,002
<PP&E>                                           6,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,507
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,905
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,655
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,434
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,470
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    77
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official pa per version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9 v. NO. 29,828 10 PHILLIP MORGAN HART, 11 Defendant-Appellant. 12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY 13 J. C. Robinson, District Judge 14 Gary K. King, Attorney General 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellee 17 Hugh W. Dangler, Chief Public Defender 18 Karl Erich Martell, Assi stant Appellate Defender 19 Santa Fe, NM 20 for Appellant 21

MEMORANDUM OPINION 22 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 232 Defendant attempts to appeal from the district court’s May 5, 2009, judgment 1 and sentence. This Court’s first notice of proposed disposition proposed to not 2 address issues concerning the voluntariness of the plea agreement because this Court’s 3 prior opinion resolving those issues was the law of the case. We further proposed to 4 hold that any substantive issues concerni ng the propriety of th e plea agreement were 5 waived when Defendant entered into a non-conditional plea agreement. The only 6 issues reviewable on appeal were those rela ted to the process on re-sentencing and the 7 remand order to allow Defendant the opportunity for allocuti on. As to those issues, 8 we proposed to hold that permitting the pros ecutor to present argument against a lesser 9 sentence did not prejudice Defendant because the same sentence was entered after 10 Defendant was given an opportunity for allocution. Defe ndant acknowledges that this 11 was the case. [MIO 6] 12
Pursuant to State v. Franklin and State v. Boyer, Defendant reiterates the same 13 arguments raised in th e docketing statement. State v. Franklin , 78 N.M. 127, 129, 428 14 P.2d 982, 984 (1967), and State v. Boyer , 103 N.M. 655, 658-60, 712 P.2d 1, 4-6 (Ct. 15 App. 1985) (stating that on appeal, defense counsel has the duty to advance 16 defendant’s non-meritorious contentions on appeal). Defendant does not otherwise 173 point to any errors in the fact or law. We are not persuaded by Defendant’s 1 arguments, and affirm the district court’s judgment and sentence. 2 For these reasons, and those stated in the first notice of proposed disposition, 3 we affirm. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

6 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

9 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 10

11 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 12
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-381-000]

Take notice that on April 18, 2001, Questar Pipeline Company (Questar) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised  Sheet No. 54, to be effective May 18, 2001.

Questar states that this filing is being tendered to reflect a change in the name and ABA number of Questar's bank to which wire transfers are to be made.

Questar states that a copy of this filing has been served upon its customers, the Public Service Commission of Utah and the Public Service Commission of Wyoming.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be  considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a  party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10471  Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert
T. Faber, certify that:




1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GoldSpring, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize,
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.





/s/ ROBERT
      T. FABERRobert
      T. FaberPresident
      andChief Financial Officer





Date:
March 5, 2010