*Table
        of Contents*







**UNITED
      STATES**


**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


Washington,
      D.C. 20549





**FORM
      10-Q/A**


(Amendment
      No. 1)




(Mark
      One)




þ
            **QUARTERLY
                REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                ACT OF
                1934**


For
      the
      quarterly period ended June 30, 2007.





 ̈
            **TRANSITION
                REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                ACT OF
                1934**.


**For
      the transition period from ____ to ____.**





Commission
      file number 1-15117.





**On2
      Technologies, Inc.**


(Exact
      name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Delaware
            84-1280679(State
                or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
            (I.R.S.
                Employer Identification No.)





21
                Corporate Drive, Suite 103, Clifton Park, New York
            12065(Address
                of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
                Code)





(518)
      348-0099


(Registrant’s
      telephone number, including area code)







(Former
      name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
      report)




Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
      be
      filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
      the
      preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
      to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
      for
      the past 90 days.   ̈ Yes  þ No




Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
      Rule
      12b-2 of the Exchange Act). þ Yes   ̈ No





APPLICABLE
      ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY


PROCEEDINGS
      DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:





Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports
      required to be filed by Sections12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed
      by a
      court.  p Yes   ̈ No




APPLICABLE
      ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:





Indicate
      the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
      stock, as of the latest applicable date:





The
      number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 (“Common
      Stock”), outstanding, as of June 16, 2008, was 159,563,152 (this number does not
      include an additional 12,500,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock that
      the Registrant is obligated to issue to the former shareholders of Hantro
      Products Oy, acquired by the Registrant in November 2007).












*Table
        of Contents*




**Explanatory
      Note**





*Except
      as otherwise stated or where the context requires otherwise, the words “On2,”
“we,” “company,” “us” and “our” refer to On2 Technologies, Inc. and its
      consolidated subsidiaries.*





We
      are
      filing this Amendment No. 1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, originally filed on August 14, 2007,
      to
      restate our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and
      for
      the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and related disclosures. As
      announced in our Current Report on Form 8-K which we filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on May 27, 2008, the
      Audit
      Committee of our Board of Directors determined on May 26, 2008 that these
      previously issued financial statements can no longer be relied upon and will
      be
      restated due to errors in those financial statements related to the Company’s
      recognition of revenue. The restatement arose from the independent review
      conducted by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors concerning certain
      contracts with customers and the recognition of revenue that we had previously
      recognized in 2007 regarding those contracts. The Audit Committee reached its
      determination following the completion of its review of five of our sales
      accounts. The Audit Committee’s review commenced after the Audit Committee was
      informed by our management that certain documentation provided to us relating
      to
      two sales accounts for which revenue had been recognized in the third quarter
      of
      2007 had been falsified. Management made this discovery during the preparation
      of our 2007 annual financial statements. The Audit Committee concluded, with
      respect to four accounts, including the two sales accounts previously mentioned,
      that we incorrectly recognized revenue of $185,000 for the second quarter of
      2007 and $589,000 **** for
      third
      quarter of 2007. In addition, during the preparation of our 2007 annual
      financial statements and prior to discovery of the falsified documentation
      mentioned above, management determined that revenue of $42,000 had been
      incorrectly recognized in the third quarter of 2007. The revenue that was
      incorrectly recognized during these periods will be recognized on a cash basis
      when and if collected. As of the filing date of this report, only a portion
      of
      the amounts owed in connection with Account 4, defined below, has been
      collected.  When
      the
      Company filed its Current Report Form 8-K on May 27, 2008, the Audit Committee
      had also preliminarily determined to establish a bad debt reserve of $383,000
      in
      the fourth quarter of 2007 for certain sales to a fifth account. Upon further
      examination of the facts and circumstances involved in sales to this account,
      we
      confirmed that sales had occurred to this account, that a reserve for $383,000
      was required, but that the reserve should have been established in the third
      quarter, rather than the fourth quarter, of 2007. To establish that reserve
      we
      recorded a general charge to general and administrative expense of $383,000
      which increased our net loss for the third quarter of 2007 by that amount (in
      addition to the $631,000 of revenue that was reversed in the period). The
      establishment of the reserve also resulted in a reduction in accounts
      receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts on our balance sheet at
      September 30, 2007, by the same amount.





The
      foregoing correction to our financial statements for the second quarter of
      2007
      increased our net loss by $185,000. The effect of the foregoing corrections
      to
      our financial statements for the third quarter of 2007 was to increase our
      net
      loss by $1,014,000.





In
      addition, to this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A, we are also
      amending our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007, originally filed on November 14, 2007 to restate
      our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for that period.
      For
      more information on these matters, please refer to Part I, Item 2,
      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
      Operations — Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements and
      Item 4, Controls and Procedures, Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, as well as Note
      3 to
      the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for
      additional information.




-
          1 -
 *Table
          of Contents*





Audit
      Committee Review




On
        May
        26, 2008, the Audit Committee determined that the financial statements in
        the
        Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30 and
        September 30, 2007, should no longer be relied upon. The Audit Committee
        reached
        this determination based on its review of the Company’s sales to five accounts
        and its conclusion that the Company’s revenue recognition as to four of those
        accounts did not comply with applicable accounting principles. One account
        of
        $300,000 ($280,000 for software and $20,000 for post-contract support), of
        which
        $280,000 was recognized in the third quarter of 2007, which represented
        approximately 10.9% of the previously-reported revenues for that quarter
        (“Account 1”); a second account of $320,000 ($300,000 for software and $20,000
        for post-contract support), of which $300,000 was recognized in the third
        quarter of 2007, which represented approximately 11.7% of the
        previously-reported revenues for that quarter (“Account 2”); a third account of
        $150,000 ($125,000 for software and $25,000 for post-contract support), of
        which
        $125,000 was recognized in the second quarter of 2007, which represented
        approximately 4.9% of the previously-reported revenues for that quarter
        (“Account 3”); and a fourth account of $70,000 ($60,000 for software and $10,000
        for post-contract support), of which $60,000 was recognized in the second
        quarter of 2007, which represented approximately 2.4% of the previously-reported
        revenues for that quarter (“Account 4”). With respect to the fifth account
        (“Account 5”) reviewed by the Audit Committee, the Company established a bad
        debt reserve in the third quarter of 2007 in the amount of $383,000, which
        reflects an estimate of the uncollectibility of certain revenues that had
        previously been recognized in the first three quarters in 2007. The Company is
        restating its previously issued financial statements for the three and six
        months ended June 30, 2007, in this Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly Report
        on
        Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, to correct the incorrect
        recognition of revenue in the period relating to Account 3 and Account 4.
        The
        Company is also restating its previously issued financial statements for
        the
        three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, in Amendment No. 1 to its
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
        2007, to correct the incorrect recognition of revenue in the period relating
        to
        Account 1 and Account 2, as well as the incorrect recognition in the period
        of
        additional $42,000 (because the Company did not have sufficient evidence
        to
        establish the creditworthiness of the customer), and the establishment of
        a bad
        debt reserve relating to Account 5.





Pursuant
        to American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position
        (SOP) 97-2, *Software
        Revenue Recognition* (“SOP
        97-2”) and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”) one element of revenue
        recognition is consideration of whether the collectibility of sales revenue
        is
        reasonably assured ( *i.e.* ,
        whether
        the purchaser is creditworthy with respect to that transaction). During
        the 2007 year-end audit process, management learned that the creditworthiness
        of
        Account 1 and Account 2, both of which were European customers, had been
        assessed, and approximately $580,000 in revenue had been recognized in the
        third
        quarter of 2007, based upon falsified documentation that the Company
        received . The
        Company learned of the falsified documentation when the sales representative
        (the “Sales Representative”) responsible for Accounts 1, 2 and 4; and who was
        also involved with Account 3; who was employed by a European outsourcing
        company
        that the Company initially retained in 2006 (and to whom the Company paid
        commissions in connection with Accounts 1, 2, 3 and 4, but whom we terminated
        in
        April 2008 as a result of this review) admitted to the Company’s Executive
        Vice-President, Legal and Business Affairs, to falsifying documentation
        purporting to establish the creditworthiness of Account 1. The documentation
        purporting to establish the creditworthiness of Account 2 was subsequently
        determined to be false, although the identity of the person or persons
        responsible for falsifying such documentation was not ascertained during
        the
        Audit Committee review.





After
        determining that the documentation purporting to support the creditworthiness
        of
        Accounts 1 and 2 was false, management informed the Audit Committee, which
        then
        commenced its review. The Audit Committee’s review focused exclusively on the
        following issues: (1) whether the false documentation identified with respect
        to
        Accounts 1 and 2 was limited to those accounts, or whether it affected other
        accounts that were either affiliated with the Sales Representative or were
        deemed by management to be material to the quarter in 2007 in which revenue
        for
        those accounts had been recognized (Accounts 3, 4 and 5); (2) whether the
        Sales
        Representative falsified documentation for his own financial benefit and/or
        at
        the direction, or with the
        knowledge, of management; and (3) whether information obtained during the
        review
        indicated that Accounts 1 and 2 were not legitimate
        transactions.


-
          2 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




The
      Audit
      Committee conducted its review of Accounts 1 through 5 with the assistance
      of
      Latham & Watkins LLP and FTI Consulting, and with the support and
      cooperation of management and personnel. The review was conducted over a period
      of approximately six weeks, and included collection and review of more than
      two
      million pages of documents, as well as interviews of eight members of management
      and sales force teams in the United States and the Sales Representative in
      Europe.





With
        respect to Account 1, with which the Company had no previous business
        relationship, the Audit Committee found that the Company paid a sales commission
        to the European outsourcing company upon execution of the contract with Account
        1, and that the Sales Representative received a commission from the outsourcing
        company in connection with Account 1, but found no evidence that the commission
        was affected by the Sales Representative’s falsification of documentation
        concerning the creditworthiness of Account 1. Although the Audit Committee
        found
        no evidence that the Sales Representative acted at the direction, or with
        the
        knowledge, of any member of management in falsifying documentation concerning
        the creditworthiness of Account 1, it found that the Sales Representative
        had
        been directed by senior management to obtain evidence of the creditworthiness
        of
        Account 1 so that revenue could be recognized in the third quarter of 2007.
        The
        Audit Committee also found that senior management did not adequately instruct
        the Sales Representative regarding (and the Company did not have a practice
        or
        policy regarding) the types of information that could be used in making a
        creditworthiness determination pursuant to the applicable revenue recognition
        accounting principles. In addition, the Audit Committee determined that,
        although sales revenue from Account 1 was recognized in the third quarter
        of
        2007, evidence relating to creditworthiness was not obtained until the fourth
        quarter of 2007, however, prior to the filing of the third quarter Form
        10-Q. The Audit Committee concluded that the sales revenue of $280,000 from
        Account 1, which was previously recognized in the third quarter of 2007,
        did not
        constitute a sale for which revenue could be recognized, and therefore no
        revenue should have been recognized in the third quarter of 2007 or any other
        period.





With
        respect to Account 2, with which the Company had no previous business
        relationship, the Audit Committee has been unable to determine the identity
        of
        the person or persons who falsified documentation concerning the
        creditworthiness of Account 2. Although the Audit Committee has found no
        evidence establishing that management directed or had knowledge of the
        falsification of any document, it has found that the Sales Representative
        had
        been directed by senior management to obtain evidence of the creditworthiness
        of
        Account 2 so that revenue could be recognized in the third quarter of 2007.
        The
        Audit Committee determined that, although sales revenue from Account 2 was
        recognized in the third quarter of 2007, evidence relating to creditworthiness
        was not obtained until the fourth quarter 2007, however, prior to the filing
        of
        the third quarter Form 10-Q. The Audit Committee also found that senior
        management did not adequately instruct the Sales Representative regarding
        (and
        the Company did not have a policy or practice regarding) the types of
        information that could be used in making a creditworthiness determination
        pursuant to the applicable revenue recognition accounting principles. The
        Audit
        Committee has concluded that the sales revenue of $300,000 from Account 2,
        which
        was previously recognized in the third quarter of 2007, did not constitute
        a
        sale for which revenue could be recognized, and therefore no revenue should
        have
        been recognized in the third quarter of 2007 or any other period. The revenue
        will be recognized on a cash basis when and if collected.





With
      respect to Accounts 3 and 4, with which the Company did not have previous
      business relationships, the Audit Committee did not find evidence of falsified
      documentation. The Audit Committee determined that the Company did not have
      sufficient evidence to establish the


-
          3 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


creditworthiness
        of Accounts 3 or 4 when it recognized $125,000 and $60,000, respectively,
        in
        revenue in the second quarter 2007, and that the Company did not have a practice
        or policy regarding the types of information that could be used in making
        such
        creditworthiness determinations. Neither Account 3 nor 4 has acknowledged
        its
        contract to the Company’s independent registered
        public accountants, and there is evidence that Account 3 disputes the
        terms of its contract with the Company. Account 3 has made no payments to
        the
        Company. Account 4 has paid a portion of its outstanding receivable, which
        is
        now current. The Audit Committee concluded that the sales revenue of $185,000
        from Accounts 3 and 4 was untimely recognized in the second quarter of 2007.
        Account 3 was determined not to constitute a sale for which revenue could
        be
        recognized in any period. The
        $60,000 of revenue from Account 4 was reclassified to deferred revenue in
        the
        second quarter of 2007 and revenue will be recognized as the payments are
        received. The Company received payments of $8,000 in the fourth quarter of
        2007
        and $30,000 in the first quarter of 2008. The balance is not yet due.
        Additionally, the Company reversed $9,000 of support revenue associated with
        Accounts 3 and 4 in the third quarter of 2007.





With
        respect to Account 5, with which the Company had a prior business relationship,
        the Audit Committee did not find evidence of falsified documentation. The
        Audit
        Committee found that the creditworthiness of Account 5 was based on the past
        credit payment history with the Company. It also found that, when payments
        associated with Account 5 became past due in 2007, the Company continued
        selling
        to Account 5 without re-assessing its creditworthiness until September 2007,
        when the account was significantly past due. Further sales were suspended
        in the
        fourth quarter of 2007. The Audit Committee concurred with management’s
        recommendation that a bad debt reserve of $383,000 should be taken in the
        fourth
        quarter of 2007 in connection with its sales to Account 5. Upon further
        examination of the facts and circumstances involved in Account 5, the Company
        confirmed that sales had occurred to Account 5, that a reserve for $383,000
        was
        required, but that the reserve should have been established in the third
        quarter, rather than the fourth quarter, of 2007. To establish that reserve,
        the
        Company recorded a general charge to general and administrative expense of
        $383,000, which increased the Company’s net loss for the third quarter of 2007
        by that amount (in addition to the $631,000 of revenue that was reversed
        in the
        period). The establishment of the reserve also resulted in a reduction in
        accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts on the Company’s
        balance sheet at September 30, 2007, by the same amount.





In
      addition, during the preparation of the Company’s 2007 annual financial
      statements and prior to discovery of the falsified documentation mentioned
      above, management determined that revenue of $42,000 had been incorrectly
      recognized in the third quarter of 2007 because of insufficient evidence to
      establish the creditworthiness of the customer.





Management
        also conducted a review of the Company’s sales to all accounts for which revenue
        was recognized in fiscal 2007, including the accounts of Hantro Products
        Oy,
        which the Company acquired in November 2007, for the purposes of determining
        that the criteria set forth in SOP 97-2 and SAB 104 were satisfied and that
        revenue was properly recognized for each account. Management concluded that,
        except for the accounts discussed above and the $42,000 that also was
        incorrectly recognized, the criteria set forth in SOP 97-2 and SAB 104 were
        satisfied and revenue was properly recognized for all of these accounts.





**Identification
      of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial
      Reporting**





As
        a
        result of the determination to restate the Company’s financial statements and in
        connection with the preparation of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
        year
        ended December 31, 2007, management identified three material weaknesses
        in the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and internal
        control over financial reporting and reported those to the Company's Audit
        Committee. Management identified a material weakness in the Company's
        procedures for recognizing revenue, specifically with respect to
        the Company's procedures for assessing whether collectibility is reasonably
        assured. This material weakness resulted in the incorrect recognition of
        revenue
        in the Company's financial statements for the second and third quarters of
        2007. In addition, management identified a material weakness in
        the Company's control environment,


-
          4 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


specifically
        relating to the Company's tone at the top. This material weakness was
        evidenced by the control tone and control consciousness of the Company's
        former chief executive officer, resulting in the override and the possibility
        of
        override of controls or
        interference with the Company's policies, procedures and internal control
        over financial reporting. Management also identified a material weakness
        in the
        design and operation of the Company's procedures for determining the
        accuracy and completeness of the Company's estimate of allowance for
        doubtful accounts. This material weakness resulted in a misstatement of accounts
        receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts on the Company's balance
        sheet at the end of the third quarter of 2007 and an understatement of
        the Company's general and administrative expenses for the period. **** Prior
        to
        the filing of this report, the Company has taken certain steps to
        remediate these material weaknesses and is in the process of finalizing a
        plan
        and timetable for the implementation of additional remediation measures to
        further address these material weaknesses .
        T hese
        material weaknesses and the remediation measures are further described
        below in Item 4 of this Form 10-Q/A.




For
      the
      convenience of the reader, this Form 10-Q/A restates the June 30, 2007 Form
      10-Q
      in its entirety. Generally, no attempt has been made in this Form 10Q/A to
      modify or update other disclosures presented in the original report on Form
      10-Q
      except as required to reflect the effects of the restatement. This Form 10-Q/A
      does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the original Form 10-Q
      or
      modify or update those disclosures. Information not affected by the restatement
      is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the original
      filing of the Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August
      14, 2007. Accordingly, this Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with
      the
      Company’s filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission subsequent to
      the filing of the original Form 10-Q. The following items have been amended
      as a
      result of the restatement:





·
            Part
                I, Item 1: Financial Information


·
            Part
                I, Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
                Results of Operations


·
            Part
                I, Item 4: Controls and Procedures


·
            Part
                II, Item 1A: Risk Factors (solely to reflect this
                restatement)





In
      addition, in accordance with applicable SEC rules, this Form 10-Q/A includes
      updated certifications from our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2.


-
          5 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




**TABLE
      OF CONTENTS**





Page**PART
                I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION**Item
                1. Consolidated Financial
                StatementsCondensed
                Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2007
                (unaudited) (restated) and December 31, 2006
            7Unaudited
                Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations,
                Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 (restated) and
                2006
            8Unaudited
                Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
                Loss for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 (restated)
                and
                2006
            9Unaudited
                Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six
                Months Ended June 30, 2007 (restated) and 2006
            10Notes
                to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
                Statements
            12Item
                2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
                Condition and Results of Operations
            22Item
                3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
                Market Risk
            35Item
                4. Controls and Procedures
            35**PART
                II — OTHER INFORMATION**Item
                1. Legal Proceedings
            39Item
                1A. Risk Factors
            40Item
                6. Exhibits
            50Signatures
            51Certifications
            52





-
            6 -
 *Table
            of Contents*




**PART
      I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION**





**Item
      1.****Consolidated
      Financial Statements**





**ON2
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**


**CONDENSED
      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS**





**June
                30,****2007**
            
            **December
                31, 2006****(unaudited
                and as**
              **restated)****ASSETS**Current
                assets:Cash
                and cash equivalents
            
            $
            10,369,000
            
            $
            4,961,000Marketable
                securities, at market
            
            
            96,000
            
            
            154,000Accounts
                receivable, net
            
            
            2,127,000
            
            
            1,335,000Prepaid
                and other current assets
            
            
            259,000
            
            
            231,000Total
                current assets
            
            
            12,851,000
            
            
            6,681,000Acquired
                Software, net
            
            
            367,000
            
            
            467,000Other
                Acquired Intangibles, net
            
            
            85,000
            
            
            108,000Goodwill
            
            
            244,000
            
            
            244,000Property
                and equipment, net
            
            
            261,000
            
            
            157,000Deferred
                acquisition costs
            
            
            1,107,000Other
                assets
            
            
            131,000
            
            
            230,000Total
                assets
            
            $
            15,046,000
            
            $
            7,887,000**LIABILITIES
                AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY**Current
                liabilities:Accounts
                payable
            
            $
            343,000
            
            $
            194,000Accrued
                expenses
            
            
            897,000
            
            
            454,000Deferred
                revenue
            
            
            683,000
            
            
            708,000Term-loan
            
            
            143,000
            
            
            33,000Capital
                lease obligation
            
            
            21,000
            
            
            24,000Total
                current liabilities
            
            
            2,087,000
            
            
            1,413,000Capital
                lease obligation, excluding current portion
            
            
            23,000
            
            
            29,000Warrant
                derivative liability
            
            
            3⁄4
            
            
            2,329,000Total
                liabilities
            
            
            2,110,000
            
            
            3,771,000Commitments
                and contingenciesSeries
                D redeemable convertible preferred stock
            
            
            677,000
            
            
            3,083,000Stockholders’
                equity:Preferred
                stock
            
            
            3⁄4
            
            
            19,000Common
                stock
            
            
            1,161,000
            
            
            1,012,000Additional
                paid-in capital
            
            
            139,452,000
            
            
            124,554,000Accumulated
                other comprehensive loss
            
            
            (51,000
            )
            
            (46,000
            )Accumulated
                deficit
            
            
            (128,303,000
            )
            
            (124,506,000
            )Total
                stockholders’ equity
            
            
            12,259,000
            
            
            1,033,000Total
                liabilities and stockholders’ equity
            
            $
            15,046,000
            
            $
            7,887,000


*See
      accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements*


-
          7 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




**ON2
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**


**UNAUDITED
      CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
      OPERATIONS**




**Three
                Months Ended**
              **June
                30,**
            
            **Six
                Months Ended**
              **June
                30,****2007**
              **(as
                restated)**
            
            **2006**
            
            **2007**
              **(as
                restated)**
            
            **2006****Revenue**
            
            $
            2,369,000
            
            $
            1,535,000
            
            $
            5,184,000
            
            $
            2,752,000Operating
                expenses:Cost
                of revenue (1)
            
            
            389,000
            
            
            705,000
            
            
            812,000
            
            
            1,288,000Research
                and development (2)
            
            
            562,000
            
            
            214,000
            
            
            1,055,000
            
            
            439,000Sales
                and marketing (2)
            
            
            614,000
            
            
            172,000
            
            
            1,210,000
            
            
            360,000General
                and administrative (2)
            
            
            980,000
            
            
            1,280,000
            
            
            1,939,000
            
            
            2,540,000Equity-based
                compensation:Research
                and development
            
            
            19,000
            
            
            25,000
            
            
            20,000
            
            
            52,000Sales
                and marketing
            
            
            27,000
            
            
            23,000
            
            
            54,000
            
            
            58,000General
                and administrative
            
            
            108,000
            
            
            663,000
            
            
            228,000
            
            
            711,000Total
                operating expenses
            
            
            2,699,000
            
            
            3,082,000
            
            
            5,318,000
            
            
            5,448,000(Loss)
                income from operations
            
            
            (330,000
            )
            
            (1,547,000
            )
            
            (134,000
            )
            
            (2,696,000
            )Interest
                and other income (expense), net
            
            
            (2,672,000
            )
            
            1,000
            
            
            (3,585,000
            )
            
            (26,000
            )Loss
                before provision for income taxes
            
            
            (3,002,000
            )
            
            (1,546,000
            )
            
            (3,719,000
            )
            
            (2,722,000
            )Provision
                for income taxes
            
            
            (3,000
            )
            
            (3,000
            )
            
            (7,000
            )
            
            (6,000
            )Net
                loss
            
            
            (3,005,000
            )
            
            (1,549,000
            )
            
            (3,726,000
            )
            
            (2,728,000
            )Convertible
                preferred stock 8% dividend expense
            
            
            (18,000
            )
            
            (73,000
            )
            
            (71,000
            )
            
            (146,000
            )Net
                loss attributable to common shareholders
            
            $
            (3,023,000
            )
            $
            (1,622,000
            )
            $
            (3,797,000
            )
            $
            (2,874,000
            )Basic
                and diluted net loss attributable to common shareholders per common
                share
            
            $
            (0.03
            )
            $
            (0.02
            )
            $
            (0.04
            )
            $
            (0.03
            )Weighted
                average basic and diluted common shares
                outstanding:
            
            
            111,752,000
            
            
            95,530,000
            
            
            107,698,000
            
            
            94,232,000





**(1)**
            **Includes
                equity-based compensation of $14,000 and $15,000 for the three and
                six
                months ended June30, 2007. Includes equity-based compensation of
                $52,000
                and $109,000 for the three and six months ended June 30,
                2006.**





**(2)**
            **Excludes
                equity-based compensation, which is presented
                separately.**






*See
      accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
      statements*





-
            8 -
 *Table
            of Contents*




**ON2
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**


**UNAUDITED
      CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE
      LOSS**





**Three
                Months Ended**
              **June
                30,**
            
            **Six
                Months Ended**
              **June
                30,****2007**
              **(as
                restated)**
            
            **2006**
            
            **2007**
              **(as
                restated)**
            
            **2006****Net
                loss**
            
            $
            (3,005,000
            )
            $
            (1,549,000
            )
            $
            (3,726,000
            )
            $
            (2,728,000
            )Other
                comprehensive income (loss):Foreign
                currency translation adjustment
            
            
            (3,000
            )
            
            (1,000
            )
            
            (5,000
            )
            
            (2,000
            )Comprehensive
                loss
            
            $
            (3,008,000
            )
            $
            (1,550,000
            )
            $
            (3,731,000
            )
            $
            (2,730,000
            )


*See
      accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
      statements*








-
            9 -
 *Table
            of Contents*




**ON2
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**


**UNAUDITED
      CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
      FLOWS**





**Six
                Months Ended June 30,****2007**
              **(as
                restated)**
            
            **2006**Cash
                flows from operating activities:Net
                loss
            
            $
            (3,726,000
            )
            $
            (2,728,000
            )Adjustments
                to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
                activities:Equity-based
                compensation
            
            
            317,000
            
            
            930,000Charge
                recognized for warrant amendment
            
            
            86,000Depreciation
                and amortization
            
            
            182,000
            
            
            159,000Amortization
                of debt discount
            
            
            
            
            
            6,000Unrealized
                loss on marketable securities
            
            
            
            
            
            50,000Insurance
                expense financed with term-loan
            
            
            7,000Realized
                loss on marketable securities
            
            
            27,000Change
                in fair value of warrant derivative liability
            
            
            3,582,000Changes
                in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts
                receivable
            
            
            (792,000
            )
            
            (44,000
            )Prepaid
                expenses and other assets
            
            
            101,000
            
            
            (13,000
            )Accounts
                payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
            
            
            608,000
            
            
            49,000Deferred
                revenue
            
            
            (25,000
            )
            
            (77,000
            )Net
                cash provided by (used in) operating activities
            
            
            367,000
            
            
            (1,668,000
            )Cash
                flows from investing activities:Purchase
                of marketable securities
            
            
            (96,000
            )Proceeds
                form the sale of marketable securities
            
            
            127,000
            
            
            75,000Deferred
                acquisition costs
            
            
            (1,107,000
            )Purchases
                of property and equipment
            
            
            (154,000
            )
            
            (44,000
            )Net
                (used in) cash provided by investing activities
            
            
            (1,230,000
            )
            
            31,000Cash
                flows from financing activities:Principal
                payments on capital lease obligations
            
            
            (15,000
            )
            
            (10,000
            )Principal
                payments on term-loan
            
            
            (33,000
            )Purchase
                of treasury stock
            
            
            (472,000
            )Proceeds
                from term-loan, net of repayments
            
            
            
            
            
            96,000Proceeds
                from exercise of common stock options and warrants
            
            
            6,796,000
            
            
            353,000Net
                cash provided by financing activities
            
            
            6,276,000
            
            
            439,000**Net
                change in cash and cash equivalents**
            
            
            5,413,000
            
            
            (1,198,000
            )Effect
                of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
            
            
            (5,000
            )
            
            (2,000
            )Cash
                and cash equivalents, beginning of period
            
            
            4,961,000
            
            
            3,976,000Cash
                and cash equivalents, end of period
            
            $
            10,369,000
            
            $
            2,776,000





-
          10 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




**ON2
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**


**UNAUDITED
      CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
      (CONTINUED)**





**Supplemental
      disclosure of cash flow information and non-cash investing and financing
      activities:**




**Six
                Months Ended June 30,****2007**
              **(as
                restated)**
            
            **2006**Cash
                paid during the period for:Interest
            
            $
            3,000
            
            $
            2,000Taxes
            
            $
            8,000
            
            $
            8,000Conversion
                of debentures into shares of common stock
            
            
            
            
            $
            250,000Conversion
                of preferred stock into shares of common stock
            
            $
            2,425,000
            
            $
            175,000Decrease
                in accrued dividend on Series D Preferred Stock
            
            $
            16,000
            
            $
            3,000Stock
                issued to Wildform pursuant to the Support and Services
                Agreement
            
            
            
            
            $
            258,000Common
                stock issued for dividends on Series D Preferred Stock
            
            $
            81,000
            
            $
            149,000Write
                off of warrant derivative liability
            
            $
            5,911,000Prepaid
                insurance financed with term-loan
            
            $
            143,000Acquisition
                of fixed assets under capital lease
            
            $
            6,000Deferred
                financing costs charged to paid-in-capital on exercise of
                warrants
            
            $
            106,000Cashless
                exercises of stock options and warrants
            
            $
            959,000Retirement
                of treasury stock
            
            $
            1,431,000


*See
      accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
      statements*








-
            11 -
 *Table
            of Contents*




**ON2
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**


**NOTES
      TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**





(1)
            Description
                of On2 Technologies, Inc.





On2
      Technologies, Inc. (“On2” or the “Company”) is a video compression technology
      firm that has developed its proprietary technology platform and video
      compression/decompression software (“codec”) to deliver high-quality video at
      the lowest possible data rates to intra- and internets, such as set-top boxes,
      the Internet and wireless devices. The Company offers a suite of products and
      professional services that encompass its proprietary compression technology.
      The
      Company’s professional service offerings include customized engineering and
      consulting services and high-level video encoding. In addition, the Company
      licenses its software products for use with video delivery platforms.





The
      Company’s business is characterized by rapid technological change, new product
      development and evolving industry standards. Inherent in the Company’s business
      model are various risks and uncertainties, including its limited operating
      history, unproven business model and the limited history of the industry in
      which it operates. The Company’s success may depend, in part, upon the wide
      adoption of video delivery media, prospective product and service development
      efforts and the acceptance of the Company’s technology solutions by the
      marketplace.





(2)
            Basis
                of Presentation





The
      unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts
      of
      the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
      balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.





The
      interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited. However,
      in
      the opinion of management, such financial statements contain all adjustments
      (consisting of normally recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the
      financial position of the Company and its results of operations and cash flows
      for the interim periods presented. The condensed consolidated financial
      statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
      regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain
      information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial
      statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
      in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
      such
      rules and regulations. The Company believes that the disclosures included herein
      are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed
      consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual
      financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K
      Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the SEC
      on
      March 23, 2007, as amended April 30, 2007 and May 10, 2007.





(3)
            Restatement





On2
      has
      restated its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the
      three
      and six months ended June 30, 2007 to eliminate revenue when the criteria for
      revenue recognition under American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’
Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, *Software
      Revenue Recognition* (“SOP
      97-2”) was
      not
      met. The impact of the restatement in this report is to decrease revenues in
      the
      second quarter of 2007 by $185,000.





The
      restatement arose from the independent review conducted by the Audit Committee
      of the Company’s Board of Directors concerning certain contracts with customers
      and the recognition of revenue that the Company had previously recognized in
      2007 regarding those contracts. The Audit Committee reached its determination
      following the completion of its review of five of the Company’s sales accounts.
      The Audit Committee’s review commenced after the Audit Committee was informed
      by


-
          12 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


the
      Company’s management that certain documentation provided to the Company relating
      to two sales accounts for which revenue had been recognized in the third quarter
      of 2007 had been falsified. Management made this discovery during the
      preparation of the Company’s 2007 annual financial statements. The Audit
      Committee concluded, with respect to four accounts, including the two sales
      accounts previously mentioned, that the Company incorrectly recognized revenue
      of $185,000 for the second quarter of 2007 and $589,000 **** for
      the
      third quarter of 2007. In addition, during the preparation of the Company’s 2007
      annual financial statements and prior to discovery of the falsified
      documentation mentioned above, management determined that revenue of $42,000
      had
      been incorrectly recognized in the third quarter of 2007 because the Company
      did
      not have sufficient evidence to establish the creditworthiness of the customer.
      The revenue that was incorrectly recognized during these periods will be
      recognized on a cash basis when and if collected. As of the filing date of
      this
      report, only a portion of the amounts owed in connection with Account 4, defined
      below, has been collected.  When
      the
      Company filed its Current Report Form 8-K on May 27, 2008, the Audit Committee
      had also preliminarily determined to establish a bad debt reserve of $383,000
      in
      the fourth quarter of 2007 for certain sales to a fifth account. Upon further
      examination of the facts and circumstances involved in sales to this account,
      the Company confirmed that sales had occurred to this account, that a reserve
      for $383,000 was required, but that the reserve should have been established
      in
      the third quarter, rather than the fourth quarter, of 2007. To establish that
      reserve the Company recorded a general charge to general and administrative
      expense of $383,000 which increased the Company’s net loss for the third quarter
      of 2007 by that amount. The establishment of the reserve also resulted in a
      reduction in accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts on
      the
      Company’s balance sheet at September 30, 2007, by the same amount.





The
      foregoing correction to the Company’s financial statements for the second
      quarter of 2007 increased the Company’s net loss by $185,000. The effect of the
      foregoing corrections to the Company’s financial statements for the third
      quarter of 2007 was to increase the Company’s net loss by
      $1,014,000.





Financial
      information included in the reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K filed by the
      Company and all earnings press releases and similar communications issued by
      the
      Company for the period ended on June 30, 2007 should not be relied upon and
      are
      superseded in their entirety by the information contained in this amended
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30,
      2007.





Audit
      Committee Review





On
      May
      26, 2008, the Audit Committee determined that the financial statements in the
      Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30 and
      September 30, 2007, should no longer be relied upon. The Audit Committee reached
      this determination based on its review of the Company’s sales to five accounts
      and its conclusion that the Company’s revenue recognition as to four of those
      accounts did not comply with applicable accounting principles. One account
      of
      $300,000 ($280,000 for software and $20,000 for post-contract support), of
      which
      $280,000 was recognized in the third quarter of 2007, which represented
      approximately 10.9% of the previously-reported revenues for that quarter
      (“Account 1”); a second account of $320,000 ($300,000 for software and $20,000
      for post-contract support), of which $300,000 was recognized in the third
      quarter of 2007, which represented approximately 11.7% of the
      previously-reported revenues for that quarter (“Account 2”); a third account of
      $150,000 ($125,000 for software and $25,000 for post-contract support), of
      which
      $125,000 was recognized in the second quarter of 2007, which represented
      approximately 4.9% of the previously-reported revenues for that quarter
      (“Account 3”); and a fourth account of $70,000 ($60,000 for software and $10,000
      for post-contract support), of which $60,000 was recognized in the second
      quarter of 2007, which represented approximately 2.4% of the previously-reported
      revenues for that quarter (“Account 4”). With respect to the fifth account
      (“Account 5”) reviewed by the Audit Committee, the Company established a bad
      debt reserve in the third quarter of 2007 in the amount of $383,000, which
      reflects an estimate of the uncollectibility of certain revenues that had
      previously been recognized in the first three quarters in 2007. The Company
      is
      restating its previously issued financial statements for the three and
      six


-
          13 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


months
        ended June 30, 2007, in this Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly Report on Form
        10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, to correct the incorrect
        recognition of revenue in the period relating to Account 3 and Account 4.
        The
        Company is also restating its previously issued financial statements for
        the
        three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, in Amendment No. 1 to its
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
        2007,
        to correct the incorrect recognition of revenue in the period relating to
        Account 1 and Account 2, as well as the incorrect recognition in the period
        of
        additional $42,000 (because the Company did not have sufficient evidence
        to
        establish the creditworthiness of the customer), and the establishment of
        a bad
        debt reserve relating to Account 5.





Pursuant
        to American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position
        (SOP) 97-2, *Software
        Revenue Recognition* (“SOP
        97-2”) and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”) one element of revenue recognition is consideration of whether the collectibility of sales revenue
        is
        reasonably assured ( *i.e.* ,
        whether
        the purchaser is creditworthy with respect to that transaction). During
        the 2007 year-end audit process, management learned that the creditworthiness
        of
        Account 1 and Account 2, both of which were European customers, had been
        assessed, and approximately $580,000 in revenue had been recognized in the
        third
        quarter of 2007, based upon falsified documentation that the Company
        received . The
        Company learned of the falsified documentation when the sales representative
        (the “Sales Representative”) responsible for Accounts 1, 2 and 4; and who was
        also involved with Account 3; who was employed by a European outsourcing
        company
        that the Company initially retained in 2006 (and to whom the Company paid
        commissions in connection with Accounts 1, 2, 3 and 4, but whom we terminated
        in
        April 2008 as a result of this review) admitted to the Company’s Executive
        Vice-President, Legal and Business Affairs, to falsifying documentation
        purporting to establish the creditworthiness of Account 1. The documentation
        purporting to establish the creditworthiness of Account 2 was subsequently
        determined to be false, although the identity of the person or persons
        responsible for falsifying such documentation was not ascertained during
        the
        Audit Committee review.





After
        determining that the documentation purporting to support the creditworthiness
        of
        Accounts 1 and 2 was false, management informed the Audit Committee, which
        then
        commenced its review. The Audit Committee’s review focused exclusively on the
        following issues: (1) whether the false documentation identified with respect
        to
        Accounts 1 and 2 was limited to those accounts, or whether it affected other
        accounts that were either affiliated with the Sales Representative or were
        deemed by management to be material to the quarter in 2007 in which revenue
        for
        those accounts had been recognized (Accounts 3, 4 and 5); (2) whether the
        Sales
        Representative falsified documentation for his own financial benefit and/or
        at
        the direction, or with the knowledge, of management; and (3) whether information
        obtained during the review indicated that Accounts 1 and 2 were not legitimate
        transactions.





The
      Audit
      Committee conducted its review of Accounts 1 through 5 with the assistance
      of
      Latham & Watkins LLP and FTI Consulting, and with the support and
      cooperation of management and personnel. The review was conducted over a period
      of approximately six weeks, and included collection and review of more than
      two
      million pages of documents, as well as interviews of eight members of management
      and sales force teams in the United States and the Sales Representative in
      Europe.





With
        respect to Account 1, with which the Company had no previous business
        relationship, the Audit Committee found that the Company paid a sales commission
        to the European outsourcing company upon execution of the contract with Account
        1, and that the Sales Representative received a commission from the outsourcing
        company in connection with Account 1, but found no evidence that the commission
        was affected by the Sales Representative’s falsification of documentation
        concerning the creditworthiness of Account 1. Although the Audit Committee
        found
        no evidence that the Sales Representative acted at the direction, or with
        the
        knowledge, of any member of management in falsifying documentation concerning
        the creditworthiness of Account 1, it found that the Sales Representative
        had
        been directed by senior management to obtain evidence of the creditworthiness
        of
        Account 1 so that revenue could be recognized in the third quarter of 2007.
        The
        Audit Committee also found that senior management did not adequately instruct
        the Sales Representative regarding (and the Company did not have a practice
        or
        policy regarding) the types of information that could be used in making a
        creditworthiness determination pursuant to the applicable revenue recognition
        accounting principles. In addition, the Audit Committee determined that,
        although sales revenue from Account 1 was recognized in the third quarter
        of
        2007, evidence relating to creditworthiness was not obtained until the fourth
        quarter of 2007, however, prior to the filing of the third quarter Form 10-Q.
        The Audit Committee concluded that the sales revenue of $280,000 from Account
        1,
        which was previously recognized in the third quarter of 2007, did not constitute
        a sale for which revenue could be recognized, and therefore no revenue should
        have been recognized in the third quarter of 2007 or any other
        period.


-
          14 -
 *Table
          of Contents*





With
        respect to Account 2, with which the Company had no previous business
        relationship, the Audit Committee has been unable to determine the identity
        of
        the person or persons who falsified documentation concerning the
        creditworthiness of Account 2. Although the Audit Committee has found no
        evidence establishing that management directed or had knowledge of the
        falsification of any document, it has found that the Sales Representative
        had
        been directed by senior management to obtain evidence of the creditworthiness
        of
        Account 2 so that revenue could be recognized in the third quarter of 2007.
        The
        Audit Committee determined that, although sales revenue from Account 2 was
        recognized in the third quarter of 2007, evidence relating to creditworthiness
        was not obtained until the fourth quarter 2007, however, prior to the filing
        of
        the third quarter Form 10-Q. The Audit Committee also found that senior
        management did not adequately instruct the Sales Representative regarding
        (and
        the Company did not have a policy or practice regarding) the types of
        information that could be used in making a creditworthiness determination
        pursuant to the applicable revenue recognition accounting principles. The
        Audit
        Committee has concluded that the sales revenue of $300,000 from Account 2,
        which
        was previously recognized in the third quarter of 2007, did not constitute
        a
        sale for which revenue could be recognized, and therefore no revenue should
        have
        been recognized in the third quarter of 2007 or any other period. The revenue
        will be recognized on a cash basis when and if collected.





With
        respect to Accounts 3 and 4, with which the Company did not have previous
        business relationships, the Audit Committee did not find evidence of falsified
        documentation. The Audit Committee determined that the Company did not have
        sufficient evidence to establish the creditworthiness of Accounts 3 or 4
        when it
        recognized $125,000 and $60,000, respectively, in revenue in the second quarter
        2007, and that the Company did not have a practice or policy regarding the
        types
        of information that could be used in making such creditworthiness
        determinations. Neither Account 3 nor 4 has acknowledged its contract to
        the
        Company’s independent registered public accountants, and there is evidence that
        Account 3 disputes the terms of its contract with the Company. Account 3
        has
        made no payments to the Company. Account 4 has paid a portion of its outstanding
        receivable, which is now current. The Audit Committee concluded that the
        sales
        revenue of $185,000 from Accounts 3 and 4 was untimely recognized in the
        second
        quarter of 2007. Account 3 was determined not to constitute a sale for which
        revenue could be recognized in any period. The
        $60,000 of revenue from Account 4 was reclassified to deferred revenue in
        the
        second quarter of 2007 and revenue will be recognized as the payments are
        received. The Company received payments of $8,000 in the fourth quarter of
        2007
        and $30,000 in the first quarter of 2008. The balance is not yet
        due. Additionally,
        the Company reversed $9,000 of support revenue associated with Accounts 3
        and 4
        in the third quarter of 2007.





With
      respect to Account 5, with which the Company had a prior business relationship,
      the Audit Committee did not find evidence of falsified documentation. The Audit
      Committee found that the creditworthiness of Account 5 was based on the past
      credit payment history with the Company. It also found that, when payments
      associated with Account 5 became past due in 2007, the Company continued selling
      to Account 5 without re-assessing its creditworthiness until September 2007,
      when the account was significantly past due. Further sales were suspended in
      the
      fourth quarter of 2007. The Audit


-
          15 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


Committee
        concurred with management’s recommendation that a bad debt reserve of $383,000
        should be taken in the fourth quarter of 2007 in connection with its sales
        to
        Account 5. Upon further examination of the facts and circumstances involved
        in
        Account 5, the Company confirmed that sales had occurred to Account 5, that
        a
        reserve for $383,000 was required, but that the reserve should have been
        established in the third quarter, rather than the fourth quarter, of 2007. 
To establish that reserve, the Company recorded a general charge to general
        and
        administrative expense of $383,000, which increased the Company’s net loss for
        the third quarter of 2007 by that amount (in addition to the $631,000 of
        revenue
        that was reversed in the period).  The establishment of the reserve also
        resulted in a reduction in accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
        accounts on the Company’s balance sheet at September 30, 2007, by the same
        amount.





In
      addition, during the preparation of the Company’s 2007 annual financial
      statements and prior to discovery of the falsified documentation mentioned
      above, management determined that revenue of $42,000 had been incorrectly
      recognized in the third quarter of 2007 because of insufficient evidence to
      establish the creditworthiness of the customer.





Management
        also conducted a review of the Company’s sales to all accounts for which revenue
        was recognized in fiscal 2007, including the accounts of Hantro, which the
        Company acquired in November 2007, for the purposes of determining that the
        criteria set forth in SOP 97-2 and SAB 104 were satisfied and that revenue
        was
        properly recognized for each account. Management
        concluded that, except for the accounts discussed above and the $42,000 that
        also was incorrectly recognized, the criteria s et
        forth
        in SOP 97-2 and SAB 104 were satisfied and revenue was properly recognized
        for
        all of these accounts.





Identification
      of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial
      Reporting





As
        a
        result of the determination to restate the Company’s financial statements and in
        connection with the preparation of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
        year
        ended December 31, 2007, management identified three material weaknesses
        in the
        Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial
        reporting and reported those to the Company’s Audit Committee. Management
        identified a material weakness in the Company’s procedures for recognizing
        revenue, specifically with respect to the Company’s procedures for assessing
        whether collectibility is reasonably assured. This material weakness resulted
        in
        the incorrect recognition of revenue in the Company’s financial statements for
        the second and third quarters of 2007. In addition, management identified
        a
        material weakness in the Company’s control environment, specifically relating to
        the Company’s tone at the top. This material weakness was evidenced by the
        control tone and control consciousness of the Company’s former chief executive
        officer, resulting in the override and the possibility of override of
        controls or
        interference with the Company’s policies, procedures and internal control over
        financial reporting. Management also identified a material weakness in the
        design and operation of the Company’s procedures for determining the accuracy
        and completeness of the
        Company’s estimate
        of allowance for doubtful accounts. This material weakness resulted in a
        misstatement of accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
        on the
        Company’s balance
        sheet at the end of the third quarter of 2007 and an understatement of the
        Company’s general
        and administrative expenses for the period. Prior to the filing of this report,
        the Company has taken certain steps to remediate these material weaknesses
        and
        is in the process of finalizing a
        plan
        and timetable for the implementation of additional remediation measures to
        further address these material weaknesses . These
        material weaknesses and the remediation measures are further described below
        in
        Item 4 of this Form 10-Q/A.





Restatement
      Adjustments





The
      following tables present the effects of the restatement adjustments on the
      following financial information as of June 30, 2007 and for the three and six
      month periods ended June 30, 2007:





Consolidated
      Balance Sheet:


-
          16 -
 *Table
          of Contents*





**June
                30, 2007**
            
            **As
                Previously**
              **Reported**
            
            **Adjustments**
            
            **As
                Adjusted**Accounts
                receivable, net
            
            $
            2,277,000
            
            $
            (150,000
            )
            $
            2,127,000Total
                Assets
            
            $
            15,196,000
            
            $
            (150,000
            )
            $
            15,046,000Deferred
                revenue
            
            $
            648,000
            
            $
            35,000
            
            $
            683,000Accumulated
                deficit
            
            $
            (128,118,000
            )
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            (128,303,000
            )Stockholders’
                Equity
            
            $
            12,444,000
            
            $
            (185,000
            )
            
            12,259,000





Consolidated
      Statement of Operations:





**Three
                Months Ended June 30, 2007**
            
            **As
                Previously**
              **Reported**
            
            **Adjustments**
            
            **As
                Adjusted**Revenue
            
            $
            2,554,000
            
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            2,369,000Loss
                from operations
            
            $
            (145,000
            )
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            (330,000
            )Net
                loss
            
            $
            (2,820,000
            )
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            (3,005,000
            )Net
                loss attributable to common shareholders
            
            $
            (2,838,000
            )
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            (3,023,000
            )Basic
                and diluted net loss attributable to common shareholders per common
                share
            
            $
            (0.03
            )
            
            -
            
            $
            (0.03
            )




**Six
                Months Ended June 30, 2007**
            
            **As
                Previously**
              **Reported**
            
            **Adjustments**
            
            **As
                Adjusted**Revenue
            
            $
            5,369,000
            
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            5,184,000Income
                (loss) from operations
            
            $
            51,000
            
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            (134,000
            )Net
                loss
            
            $
            (3,541,000
            )
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            (3,726,000
            )Net
                loss attributable to common shareholders
            
            $
            (3,612,000
            )
            $
            (185,000
            )
            $
            (3,797,000
            )Basic
                and diluted net loss attributable to common shareholders per common
                share
            
            $
            (0.03
            )
            $
            (0.01
            )
            $
            (0.04
            )





(4)
            Recently
                Issued Accounting Pronouncements




On
      January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting
      Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
      Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
      measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement
      of
      a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation
      requires that the Company recognize the impact of a tax position in the
      financial statements if that position is more likely than not of being sustained
      on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides
      guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
      in
      interim periods and disclosure. In accordance with the provisions of FIN 48,
      any
      cumulative effect resulting from the change in accounting principle is to be
      recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit.





The
      Company is in the process of performing an analysis of the limitations on use
      of
      our net operating losses under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Once
      determined, the effect of the net operating loss limitation will be a reduction
      of the deferred tax asset and corresponding reduction of the related valuation
      allowance.


-
          17 -
 *Table
          of Contents*






(5)
            Stock-Based
                Compensation





The
      following table summarizes the activity of the Company’s stock options for the
      six months ended June 30, 2007:





**Shares**
            
            **Weighted
                Average Exercise Price**
            
            **Weighted
                Average Remaining Contractual Life**
            
            **Aggregate**
              **Intrinsic
                Value**Number
                of shares under option:Outstanding
                at January 1, 2007
            
            
            9,497,000
            
            $
            1.07Granted
            
            
            10,000
            
            
            2.04Exercised
            
            
            (3,625,000
            )
            
            0.69Canceled
                or expired
            
            
            (3,000
            )
            
            0.98Outstanding
                at June 30, 2007
            
            
            5,879,000
            
            $
            1.32
            
            
            6.65
            
            $
            12,193,000Vested
                and expected to vest at June 30, 2007
            
            
            5,843,000
            
            $
            1.29
            
            
            6.28
            
            $
            12,118,000Exercisable
                at June 30, 2007
            
            
            5,237,000
            
            $
            1.36
            
            
            6.38
            
            $
            10,836,000


**The
      aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $11,212,000 for six months
      ended June 30, 2007.**





Stock
      based compensation expense recognized in the Statement of Operations was
      $168,000 and $317,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
      respectively. Stock based compensation expense recognized in the Statement
      of
      Operations was $763,000 and $930,000 for the three and six months ended June
      30,
      2006, respectively.





The
      following summarizes the activity of the Company’s non-vested stock options for
      the six months ended June 30, 2007:





**Shares**
            
            **Weighted
                Average Grant**
              **Date
                Fair Value****Non-vested
                at January 1, 2007**
            
            
            1,064,000
            
            $
            0.72**Granted**
            
            
            10,000
            
            
            2.04**Cancelled
                or expired**
            
            
            (3,000
            )
            
            0.98**Vested
                during the period**
            
            
            (429,000
            )
            
            0.70**Non-vested
                at June 30, 2007**
            
            
            642,000
            
            $
            1.38


As
      of
      June 30, 2007, there was $286,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost
      related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under
      existing stock option plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
      weighted-average period of 0.87 years. The total grant date fair value of shares
      vested during the six-months ended June 30, 2007 was $301,000.


-
          18 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




The
      Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the weighted
      average fair value of options. The fair value of options at date of grant and
      the assumptions utilized to determine such values are indicated in the following
      table:





**Six
                Months Ended**
              **June
                30, 2007**Weighted
                average fair value at date of grant for options granted during the
                period
            
            $
            1.71Expected
                stock price volatility
            
            
            99
            %Expected
                life of options
            
            
            5
                yearsRisk
                free interest rates
            
            
            4.82
            %Expected
                dividend yield
            
            
            0
            %





The
      following summarizes the activity of the Company’s non-vested restricted common
      stock for the six months ended June 30, 2007:





**Shares**
            
            **Weighted
                Average Grant**
              **Date
                Fair Value****Non-vested
                at January 1, 2007**
            
            
            **85,000**
            
            **$**
            **0.49****Granted**
            
            
            **592,000**
            
            
            **2.84****Cancelled
                or expired**
            
            
            **(20,000**
            **)**
            
            **0.63****Vested
                during the period**
            
            
            **(0**
            **)**
            
            **0.00****Non-vested
                at June 30, 2007**
            
            
            **657,000**
            
            **$**
            **2.49**





During
      the six months ended June 30, 2007 the Company granted 139,000 shares of
      restricted common stock to its Board of Directors which vests on March 12,
      2008
      and 453,000 shares of restricted common stock to its employees which vests
      over
      the next four years. As of June 30, 2007, the Company recognized $97,000 in
      compensation expense related to this grants and there was $1,382,000 of
      unrecognized compensation cost which will be recognized through the second
      quarter of 2010.





(6)
            Marketable
                Securities





As
      of
      December 31, 2006 the Company held 42,000 shares of a customer’s common stock
      with a market value of $60,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2007 the
      Company sold all 42,000 shares of this stock and received proceeds of $33,000
      and recorded a realized loss of $27,000 on the sale. The Company’s former Chief
      Executive Officer (who was a director and shareholder of the Company) was a
      director of this customer.





The
      Company invests most of its idle cash in 30 and 60 day United States Treasury
      Bills and they are recorded as cash equivalents. The Company does not accrue
      interest on these Treasury Bills rather the interest is recorded at maturity.
      For the six months ended June 30, 2007, there was $38,000 of un-accrued interest
      on these Treasury Bills.




-
          19 -
 *Table
          of Contents*





(7)
            Deferred
                Acquisition Costs


During
      the six months ended June 30, 2007 the Company incurred expenditures of
      $1,107,000 for legal and professional fees associated with the pending
      acquisition of Hantro Products Oy. These expenditures will be added to the
      acquisition price when the acquisition is complete. Should the acquisition
      not
      take place, the Company would expense the entire amount. Included in this
      expenditure is approximately $413,000 of legal services provided by a law firm
      a
      partner of which is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.




**(8)**
            **Term-loan**





During
      June 2007 the Company renewed its Directors and Officers Liability Insurance
      and
      financed the $143,000 premium with a nine-month term loan that carries an
      effective annual interest rate of 8%.





**(9)**
            **Warrant
                Derivative Liability**





During
      the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 the Company recorded charges of
      $2,668,000 and $3,582,000, respectively to reflect the change in the fair value
      of the warrant derivative liability. The fair value was calculated using the
      Black-Scholes pricing model. On June 11, 2007 the Company entered into a Letter
      Agreement with Midsummer Investments Ltd. and Rockmore Investment Master Fund
      where the parties agreed to place a $0.41 per share floor on the base share
      price for subsequent dilutive share issuances and received consideration in
      the
      form of a decrease in the warrant exercise price, from $0.77 to $0.69. The
      number of additional shares to be issued upon subsequent dilutive issuances
      is
      now finite and the Company will reserve for the issuance from its authorized
      common shares. The warrants are no longer considered a liability and the Company
      reclassified the warrant derivative liability of $5,911,000 on the date of
      modification to additional paid in capital. The Company also recorded $86,000
      in
      other expense related to the modification of the warrant.





**(10)**
            **Series
                D Redeemable Convertible Preferred
                Stock**





During
      the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 Midsummer Capital and Islandia
      converted/redeemed 1,212 and 2,406 shares of the Series D redeemable,
      convertible preferred stock into 1,543,000 and 3,133,000 shares of the Company’s
      common stock, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30,
      2007
      the Company accrued dividends of $18,000 and $71,000 and paid dividends in
      the
      amount of $26,000 and $81,000 through the issuance of 13,000 and 90,000 shares
      of common stock, respectively.





**(11)**
            **Warrants**





During
      the six months ended June 30, 2007 5,487,000 warrants were exercised and the
      Company received proceeds of $5,471,000.





(12)
            Common
                Stock





During
      the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 139,000 shares of
      restricted stock to its Board of Directors. The restricted stock vests in March
      2008. The Company recognized $40,000 and $54,000 in compensation expense for
      the
      three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.





During
      the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 453,000 shares of
      restricted stock to its employees. The restricted stock vests over a 48-month
      period. The Company recognized $43,000 in compensation expense for the three
      and
      six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.





During
      the six months ended June 30, 2007 the Company received $1,325,000 in proceeds
      and issued 1,898,000 shares of its common stock for stock option exercises.
      In
      addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2007 the Company issued 1,004,000
      shares of its common stock in cashless exercises of


-
          20 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


stock
      options and 722,000 shares were retained by the Company in payment of the
      options and related taxes.





(13)
            Treasury
                Stock





During
      the six months ended June 30, 2007 the Company allowed its employees cashless
      exercises of their stock options. Some of the Company’s stock option plans
      require that the shares retained by the Company in payment of the options and
      related taxes be recorded as Treasury stock. During the six months ended June
      30, 2007 the Company received a total of 673,000 shares at a value of
      $1,431,000, of which 215,000 shares at a value of $472,000 were received for
      payment of taxes. In April 2007 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized that
      all the shares recorded as Treasury stock be cancelled and that all subsequent
      shares received from cashless exercises be cancelled immediately after receipt.





(14)
            Customer
                Concentration





For
      the
      three months ended June 30, 2007, there was one customer that accounted for
      10%
      or more of the Company’s revenue and for the six months ended June 30, 2007
      there were no customers that accounted for 10% or greater of revenue. For the
      three months ended June 30, 2006, four customers accounted for 16%, 13%, 13%
      and
      10% of revenue and for the six months ended June 30, 2006, one customer
      accounted for 16% of revenue.





**(15)**
            **Pending
                Acquisition of Hantro Products
                Oy**





On
      May
      21, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with Nexit Ventures Oy, as
      the
      authorized representative of the holders of all outstanding equity securities
      (including outstanding share options) of Hantro Products Oy, a corporation
      organized under the laws of Finland ("Hantro") to acquire all outstanding equity
      securities of Hantro. Under the terms of the agreement, which has been approved
      by the boards of directors of both the Company and Hantro, at the closing the
      Company will pay $6,841,775 in cash and issue shares of the Company's common
      stock, par value $.01 per share, directly to the Hantro securityholders. Based
      on the closing price of the Company's common stock on August 10, 2007, the
      shares to be issued to the Hantro securityholders at the closing prior to
      adjustment would represent approximately 18% of the Company's currently
      outstanding common stock, after giving effect to the Hantro share exchange.
      Upon
      completion of the share exchange, Hantro and its subsidiary will become
      wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The number of shares to be issued
      will
      be determined at the closing of the share exchange based on the volume-weighted
      average price of the Company's common stock for the 10 trading days prior to
      the
      closing (the "Closing Share Price"). A portion of the shares payable at the
      closing will be held in escrow for a period of one year. The number of shares
      issued at the closing to the Hantro security holders is subject to adjustment
      based on Hantro’s stockholders’ equity as of the closing date.





If
      the
      Closing Share Price is between $1.50 and $2.50 per share, the total value of
      the
      shares to be issued by the Company at the closing will equal $45,000,000 less
      the cash component of $6,841,775. If the Closing Share Price is $1.50 or less,
      the Company will issue approximately 25,440,000 shares. If the Closing Share
      Price is $2.50 or more, the Company will issue approximately 15,300,000 shares.





The
      Company intends to fund the cash portion of the purchase price primarily through
      its internal cash resources. Closing of the transaction is, however, conditional
      upon the Company's having raised at least $20,000,000 from one or more offerings
      of its equity securities. The purpose of the offering is to raise equity capital
      for the combined companies.





The
      Share
      Exchange Agreement provides that the Hantro securityholders may become entitled
      to receive additional consideration of up to 12,500,000 additional shares of
      the
      Company's common stock (the “Contingent Consideration”) if Hantro’s net revenue
      for 2007 exceeds targets of €6,000,000 and


-
          21 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


€7,500,000.
      The full 12,500,000 additional shares will be issued if Hantro’s 2007 net
      revenue exceeds €9,000,000. Based on the closing price of the Company’s common
      stock on August 10, 2007, the Contingent Consideration, if fully issued, would
      represent an additional approximately 8.8% of the Company's currently
      outstanding common stock, after giving effect to the Hantro share
      exchange.





The
      acquisition, which is expected to close in Fall 2007, is subject to customary
      closing conditions, including approval by the stockholders of the Company.





**Item
      2.****Management’s
      Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results****of
      Operations (As Restated).**





**Forward-Looking
      Statements**





This
      document contains forward-looking statements concerning our expectations, plans,
      objectives, future financial performance and other statements that are not
      historical facts. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the
      meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In most cases,
      you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,”
“might,” “will,” “would,” “can”, “could,” “should,” “expect,” “foresee,” “plan,”
“anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,”
“objective,” “forecast,” “goal” or “continue,” the negative of such terms, their
      cognates, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking
      statements include statements with respect to:





•
            future
                revenues, income taxes, net income per diluted share, acquisition
                costs
                and related amortization, and other measures of results of operations;•
            the
                effects of acquiring Hantro;•
            the
                effects of the restatement of our financial statements for the quarters
                ended June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007;•
            the
                detection of wrongdoing or improper activities not identified by
                the Audit
                Committee’s review;•
            difficulties
                in controlling expenses, including the costs of the Audit Committee
                review, legal compliance matters or internal control over financial
                reporting review, improvement and remediation;•
            risks
                associated with the delisting of the Company’s shares of common stock from
                the American Stock Exchange;•
            risks
                associated with the ineffectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
                financial reporting and our ability to remediate material
                weaknesses;•
            the
                financial performance and growth of our business, including future
                international growth;•
            our
                financial position and the availability of resources;•
            future
                competition; and•
            the
                degree of seasonality in our
                revenue.




These
      statements are only predictions, and actual events or results may differ
      materially. The forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and
      assumption using information


-
          22 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


available
      at the time. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance
      or achievements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ are often
      presented with the forward-looking statements themselves. Additionally, other
      risks that may cause actual results to differ from predicted results are set
      forth, and in “ *Risk
      Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results* "
      in the
      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006,
      as
      amended.




Many
      of
      the forward-looking statements are subject to additional risks related to our
      need to either secure additional financing or to increase revenues to support
      our operations or business or technological factors. We believe that between
      the
      funds we have on hand and the funds we expect to generate, we have sufficient
      funds to finance our operations for the next 12 months. However, additional
      funds may be required in order to pursue strategic opportunities or for capital
      expenditures. In addition, there is no assurance that additional funds will
      not
      be required to support our operations. In this regard, the business and
      operations of the Company are subject to substantial risks that increase the
      uncertainty inherent in the forward-looking statements contained in this Form
      10-Q. In evaluating our business, you should give careful consideration to
      the
      information set forth below under the caption “ *Risk
      Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results* "
      in the
      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006,
      as
      amended, in addition to the other information set forth herein.




We
      undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements, whether
      as a
      result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of the
      foregoing, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
      forward-looking statements contained in this report.




**Restatement
      of Financial Statements**





On
      April
      1, 2008, the Company announced the Audit Committee was conducting an independent
      review of certain contracts with customers and the recognition of revenue that
      the Company had previously recognized in 2007 regarding those contracts. Upon
      concluding its investigation and after consultation with and upon the
      recommendation of management and the Company’s independent registered accounting
      firm, the Audit Committee determined that revenue for certain of our customer
      contracts was recognized earlier than it should have been and that the financial
      statements for the affected periods should be restated. On May 27, 2008, the
      Company announced that the Audit Committee had determined that our previously
      issued financial statements for the interim periods contained in the quarterly
      reports on Form 10-Q filed with respect to each of the quarterly periods ended
      June 30 and September 30, 2007 should not be relied upon and would be restated.
      When the Company filed its Current Report Form 8-K on May 27, 2008, the Audit
      Committee had also preliminarily determined to establish a bad debt reserve
      of
      $383,000 in the fourth quarter of 2007 for certain sales to one of the sales
      accounts reviewed. Upon further examination of the facts and circumstances
      involved in sales to this account, the Company confirmed that sales had occurred
      to this account, that a reserve for $383,000 was required, but that the reserve
      should have been established in the third quarter, rather than the fourth
      quarter, of 2007.




The
      Company is filing simultaneously this amendment and an amendment to the
      Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 to restate
      the
      financial statements and related disclosures therein.




The
      discussion and analysis set forth in this Item 2 has been amended to reflect
      the
      restatement as described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A. The amount by which the Company has reduced
      revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 is $185,000. The
      foregoing correction to our financial statements for the second quarter of
      2007
      increased our net loss by $185,000. The effect of the foregoing corrections
      to
      the Company’s financial statements for the third quarter of 2007 was to increase
      its net loss by $1,014,000.


-
          23 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


The
      Company has incurred legal and accounting and other costs related to the Audit
      Committee review and restatement of its financial statements described
      above of approximately $1,530,000, as of May 30, 2008, of which
      approximately $373,000 was expensed the first quarter of 2008 and an additional
      $1,157,000 will be expensed in the second quarter of 2008. These costs are
      expensed in the period in which the legal, accounting and other services are
      provided and are recorded as general and administrative expenses. These costs
      will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s net loss for the period in
      which they are expensed and on the Company’s liquidity for the period in which
      they are paid. The Company anticipates that it will incur additional legal,
      accounting and other fees related to the Audit Committee review and restatement.
      The Company also will incur other fees and costs related to the execution of
      the
      remediation plan adopted by the Company after the conclusion of the Audit
      Committee review.  At this time, the Company cannot estimate the amount of
      additional legal, accounting and other fees and costs that may be incurred
      in
      the second quarter of 2008 and beyond to execute this remediation plan. The
      Company believes it continues to have sufficient cash and other resources
      available to meet working capital and other needs that might arise over the
      next
      twelve months.





**Pending
      Acquisition of Hantro Products Oy**





On
      May
      21, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with Nexit Ventures Oy, as
      the
      authorized representative of the holders of all outstanding equity securities
      (including outstanding share options) of Hantro Products Oy, a corporation
      organized under the laws of Finland (“Hantro”) to acquire all outstanding equity
      securities of Hantro. Under the terms of the agreement, which has been approved
      by the boards of directors of both the Company and Hantro, at the closing the
      Company will pay $6,841,775 in cash and issue shares of the Company's common
      stock, par value $.01 per share, directly to the Hantro securityholders. Based
      on the closing price of the Company's common stock on August 10, 2007, the
      shares to be issued to the Hantro securityholders at the closing prior to
      adjustment would represent approximately 18% of the Company's currently
      outstanding common stock, after giving effect to the Hantro share exchange.
      Upon
      completion of the share exchange, Hantro and its subsidiary will become
      wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The number of shares to be issued
      will
      be determined at the closing of the share exchange based on the volume-weighted
      average price of the Company's common stock for the 10 trading days prior to
      the
      closing (the "Closing Share Price"). A portion of the shares payable at the
      closing will be held in escrow for a period of one year. The number of shares
      issued at the closing to the Hantro securityholders is subject to adjustment
      based on Hantro's stockholders' equity as of the closing date.





If
      the
      Closing Share Price is between $1.50 and $2.50 per share, the total value of
      the
      shares to be issued by the Company at the closing will equal $45,000,000 less
      the cash component of $6,841,775. If the Closing Share Price is $1.50 or less,
      the Company will issue approximately 25,440,000 shares. If the Closing Share
      Price is $2.50 or more, the Company will issue approximately 15,300,000 shares.





The
      Company intends to fund the cash portion of the purchase price primarily through
      its internal cash resources. Closing of the transaction is, however, conditional
      upon the Company's having raised at least $20,000,000 from one or more offerings
      of its equity securities. The purpose of the offering is to raise equity capital
      for the combined companies.





The
      Share
      Exchange Agreement provides that the Hantro securityholders may become entitled
      to receive additional consideration of up to 12,500,000 additional shares of
      the
      Company's common stock (the "Contingent Consideration") if Hantro's net revenue
      for 2007 exceeds targets of €6,000,000 and €7,500,000. The full 12,500,000
      additional shares will be issued if Hantro's 2007 net revenue exceeds
€9,000,000. Based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on August
      10, 2007, the Contingent Consideration, if fully issued, would represent an
      additional approximately 8.8% of the Company's currently outstanding common
      stock, after giving effect to the Hantro share exchange.





-
            24 -
 *Table
            of Contents*





The
      acquisition, which is expected to close in Fall 2007, is subject to customary
      closing conditions, including approval by the stockholders of the
      Company.





Set
      forth
      under Part II, Item 1A of this report is a description of some of the risks
      related to the Hantro share exchange that should be taken into consideration
      when making an investment decision regarding On2.





**Overview**





On2
      Technologies is a developer of video compression technology. We have developed
      a
      proprietary technology platform and the TrueMotion® VPx family (e.g., VP5, VP6,
      VP7) of video compression/decompression (“codec”) software to deliver
      high-quality video at the lowest possible data rates over proprietary networks
      and the Internet to set-top boxes, personal computers and wireless devices.
      Unlike many other video codecs that are based on standard compression
      specifications set by industry groups (e.g., MPEG-2 and H.264), our video
      compression/decompression technology is based solely on intellectual property
      that we developed and own ourselves.





In
      2004,
      we licensed our video compression technology to Macromedia, Inc. (now Adobe
      Systems Incorporated) for use in the Flash® multimedia player. In anticipation
      of Adobe using our codec in the Flash platform, we launched our business of
      developing and marketing video encoding software for the Flash platform. While
      our primary focus remains the development of video compression technology,
      our
      Flash encoding business is a significant part of our business.




We
      offer
      the following suite of products and services that incorporate our proprietary
      compression technology:




**Products**
            ·
            Video
                codecs;·
            Audio
              codecs; and·
            Encoding
              and server software, for use with video delivery platforms**Services**
            ·
            Customized
                engineering and consulting services; and·
            Technical
              support





Many
      of
      our customers are software developers who use our products and services chiefly
      to provide the following video-related products and services to end users:




**TYPE
                OF CUSTOMER**
              **APPLICATION**
            
            **EXAMPLES**Video
                and Audio Distribution over
              Proprietary
                Networks
            ·
            Providing
                video-on-demand services to residents in multi-dwelling units
                (MDUs)·
            Video
              surveillanceConsumer
                Electronic Devices
            ·
            Digital
                video players·
            Digital
              video recordersWireless
                Applications
            ·
            Delivery
                of video via satellite·
            Providing
              video to web-enabled cell phones and PDAs






-
          25 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




Video
                and Audio Distribution over IP-based Networks (Internet)
            ·
            Video-on-demand·
            Teleconferencing
              services·
            Video
              instant messaging·
            Video
              for Voice-over-IP (VOIP) servicesUser-Generated
                Content (“UGC”) Sites
            ·
            Providing
                encoding software for use on UGC site operators’
servers·
            Providing
                encoding software for users who are creating UGC·
            Providing
              transcoding software to allow UGC site operators to convert video from
              one
              format to another





We
      have
      begun marketing encoding software for use either by end users or by developers
      who want to add video-encoding functionality to the software they have
      developed.




We
      earn
      revenue chiefly through licensing our software and providing specialized
      software engineering and consulting services to customers. In addition to
      up-front license fees, we often require that customers pay us royalties in
      connection with their use of our software. The royalties may come in the form
      of
      either a fee for each unit of the customer’s products containing the relevant
      On2 software products that are sold or distributed or payments based on a
      percentage of the revenues that the customer earns from any of its products
      or
      services that use our software. Royalties may be subject to guaranteed minimum
      amounts and/or maximum amounts (e.g., annual caps).




We
      have
      begun selling additional products and services that relate to our existing
      relationships with licensees. For instance, if a customer has licensed our
      software to develop its own proprietary video format and video players, we
      may
      sell encoding software to users who want to encode video for playback on our
      customers’ players or we may provide engineering services to companies that want
      to modify our customer’s software for use on a specific platform, such as a cell
      phone. As with royalties or revenue share arrangements, complementary sales
      of
      encoding software or engineering services should allow us to participate in
      the
      success of our customers’ products. For instance, if a customer’s video platform
      does well commercially, we would expect there to be a market for encoding
      software and/or engineering services in support of that platform.




As
      part
      of our strategy to develop complementary products that could allow us to
      capitalize on our customers’ success, in April 2005 we completed the acquisition
      from Wildform, Inc., of its Flix® line of encoding software. The Flix software
      allows users to prepare video and other multimedia content for playback on
      the
      Adobe Flash player, which is one of the most widely distributed multimedia
      players. Adobe is currently using our VP6 software as the core video engine
      for
      Flash 8 video, which is the latest version of Flash video and is used in the
      Flash 8 and Flash 9 players. We therefore believed that there was an opportunity
      for us to sell Flash 8 encoding software to end users, such as video
      professionals and web designers, and to software development companies that
      wish
      to add Flash 8 encoding functionality to their software. We concluded that
      by
      taking the well-regarded Flix software and updating it with Flash 8 encoding
      capability, we could best take advantage of the anticipated success of Flash
      8
      by taking the most up-to-date Flash 8 encoding software straight from the
      company that developed Flash 8 video and combining it with the already
      well-known Flix brand, which has existed since the advent of Flash video and
      has
      a loyal following among users.




A
      primary
      factor that will be critical to our success is our ability to improve
      continually on our current video compression software, so that it streams the
      highest-quality video at the lowest transmission rates (bit rate). We believe
      that our video compression software is highly efficient, allowing customers
      to
      stream good quality video (as compared with that of our competitors) at low
      bit
      rates (i.e., over slow




-
          26 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


connections)
      and unsurpassed high-resolution video at high bit rates (i.e., over broadband
      connections). As connection speeds increase, however, the advantage that our
      highly efficient software has over competing technology may
      decrease.




Another
      factor that may affect our success is the relative complexity of our video
      compression software compared with other compression software producing
      comparable compression rates and image quality. Software with lower complexity
      can run on a computer chip that is less powerful, and therefore generally less
      expensive, than would be required to run software that is comparatively more
      complex. In addition, the process of getting software to operate on a chip
      is
      easier if the software is less complex. Increased compression rates frequently
      result in increased complexity. While potential customers desire software that
      produces the highest possible compression rates while producing the best
      possible decompressed image, they also want to keep production costs low by
      using the lowest-powered and accordingly least expensive chips that will still
      allow them to perform the processing they require. In addition, in some
      applications, such as mobile devices, constraints such as size and battery
      life
      rather than price issues limit the power of the chips embedded in such devices.
      Of course, in devices where a great deal of processing power can be devoted
      to
      video compression and decompression, the issue of software complexity is less
      important. In addition, in certain applications, savings in chip costs related
      to the use of low complexity software may be offset by increased costs (or
      reduced revenue) stemming from less efficient compression (e.g., increased
      bandwidth costs).




One
      of
      the most significant recent trends in our business is our increasing reliance
      on
      the success of the product deployments of our customers. As referenced above,
      an
      increasing number of our license agreements with customers provide for the
      payment of license fees that are dependent on the number of units of a
      customer’s product incorporating our software that are sold or the amount of
      revenue generated by a customer from the sale of products or services that
      incorporate our software. We have chosen this royalty-dependent licensing model
      because, as a company of approximately 40 employees and in light of the vast
      range of conceivable video-enabled devices, we do not have the product
      development or marketing resources to develop and market end-to-end video
      solutions. Instead, our codec software is primarily intended to be used as
      a
      building block for companies that are developing end-to-end video products
      and/or services.




Under
      our
      agreements with certain customers, we have retained the right to market products
      that complement those customer applications. These arrangements allow us to
      take
      advantage of our customers’ superior ability to produce and market end-to-end
      video products, while offering those customers the benefit of having us produce
      technologically-advanced products that should contribute to the success of
      their
      applications. As with arrangements in which we receive royalties, the ability
      to
      market complementary products can yield revenues in excess of any initial,
      one-time license fee. In instances where we have licensed our products to
      well-known customers, our right to sell complementary products may be very
      valuable. But unlike royalties, which we receive automatically without any
      additional effort on our part, the successful sale of complementary products
      requires that we effectively execute an end-user product development and
      marketing program. Until recently, we have generally produced software targeted
      at developers, who integrate our software into their products, and developing
      and marketing products aimed at end users is therefore a relatively new business
      for us.




We
      believe that we have adopted the licensing model most appropriate for a business
      of our size and expertise. However, a natural result of this licensing model
      is
      that the amount of revenue we generate is highly dependent on the success of
      our
      customers’ product deployments. In certain circumstances, we may decide to
      reduce the amount of up-front license fees and charge a higher per-unit royalty.
      If the products of customers with whom we have established per unit royalty
      or
      revenue sharing relationships or for which we expect to market complementary
      products do not generate significant sales, these revenues may not attain
      significant levels. In addition, our agreements with our customers usually
      do
      not require that they use our technology exclusively, so it is possible that
      a
      customer may never implement our technology or may at some point choose to
      support competing technology on which we do not receive a




-
          27 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


royalty.
      Conversely, if one or more of such customers’ products are widely adopted, our
      revenues will likely be enhanced.




We
      are
      continuing to participate in the trend towards the proliferation of user
      generated video content on the web. As Internet use has grown worldwide and
      Internet connection speeds have increased, sites such as MySpace and YouTube,
      which allow visitors to create and view user generated content (“UGC”), have
      sprung up and seen their popularity soar. Although initially that consumer
      generated content consisted primarily of text content and still photographs,
      the
      availability of relatively inexpensive digital video cameras, the growth in
      the
      number of users with access to broadband Internet connections and improvements
      in video compression technology have contributed to a rapid rise in
      consumer-created video content. Weblogs (blogs) and podcasts (broadcasts of
      audio content to iPod® and MP3 devices) have evolved to include video content.
      The continued proliferation of UGC video on the Internet and the popularity
      of
      Adobe® Flash® video on the web have had a positive effect on our business and
      has given us the opportunity to license Flash encoding tools for use in video
      blogs, video podcasts, and to UGC sites or to individual users of those
      services.




We
      have
      recently experienced an increase interest by UGC site operators and device
      manufacturers to allow users to access UGC content by means of mobile devices,
      set-top boxes, and other devices. Many of the UGC sites use Flash 8 VP6 video,
      and while Flash 8 video is available on a vast number of PCs, it is just now
      beginning to become available on chip-based devices, such as mobile devices
      and
      set top boxes. We are therefore witnessing a twofold demand: to integrate Flash
      8 video onto non-PC platforms and, until most devices can play Flash 8 content,
      to provide transcoding software that allows Flash 8 content to be decoded and
      re-encoded into a format that is supported on devices, such as the 3GPP
      standard. We are actively working to provide solutions for both of these demands
      and plan to continue to respond as necessary to the evolution and migration
      of
      Flash video.




A
      continuing trend in our business is the growing presence of Microsoft, Inc.
      as a
      principal competitor in the market for digital media creation and distribution
      technology. Microsoft currently competes with us in the market for digital
      media
      servers, players, codecs and other technology and services related to digital
      distribution of media. Microsoft distributes its competing streaming encoder,
      media server, player, tools and digital rights management products by bundling
      them with its Windows operating systems and servers at no additional cost or
      otherwise making them available free of charge or at a low cost. Microsoft’s
      practices have caused, and may continue to cause, pricing pressure on our
      revenue generating products and services and may affect usage of our competing
      products and formats. Microsoft’s marketing and licensing model has in some
      cases led, and could continue to lead, to longer sales cycles, decreased sales,
      loss of existing and potential customers and reduced market share. In addition,
      we believe that Microsoft has used and may continue to use its competitive
      position in the computer industry and its financial resources to secure
      preferential or exclusive distribution, use and bundling contracts for its
      media
      delivery technologies and products with third parties, such as ISPs, content
      delivery networks, content providers, entertainment and media companies, VARs
      and OEMs, including those third parties with whom we have relationships.
      Finally, Microsoft’s DRM (digital rights management) product, which prevents
      unauthorized copying and re-distribution of proprietary content, is widely
      accepted among movie studios and others in the content industry. Unfortunately,
      Microsoft’s DRM does not integrate well with non-Microsoft video and audio
      software, such as ours.




We
      believe that the latest generation of codec technology, which includes VP7,
      is
      superior to Microsoft’s video compression software. We also believe that
      companies may become more comfortable with using DRM technology produced by
      companies other than Microsoft.




H.264
      is
      also a competing technology in the video compression field. H.264 is a
      standards-based codec that is the successor to MPEG-4. We believe our technology
      is superior to H.264, and that we can offer significantly more flexibility
      in
      licensing terms than customers will receive when licensing H.264. H.264 has
      nevertheless gained significant adoption by potential customers because, as
      a
      standards-based




-
          28 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


codec,
      it
      has the advantage of having numerous developers who are programming to the
      H.264
      standard and developing products based on that standard. In addition, a number
      of manufacturers of multimedia processors have done the work necessary to have
      H.264 operate on their chips, which makes H.264 attractive to potential
      customers who would like to enable video on devices. For example, Apple Inc.
      uses H.264 in its QuickTime® player and, as a result, has chosen H.264 for the
      current generation of video iPods®. These advantages may make H.264 attractive
      to potential customers and allow them to implement a solution based on H.264
      with less initial development time and expense than a solution using On2 Video
      might require. In addition, there are certain customers that prefer to license
      standards-based codecs.




The
      market for digital media creation and delivery technology is constantly changing
      and becoming increasingly competitive. Our strategy includes focusing on
      providing our customers with video compression/decompression technology that
      delivers the highest possible video quality at the lowest possible data rates.
      To do this, we devote a significant portion of our engineering capacity to
      research and development. We also are devoting significant attention to enabling
      our codecs to operate on a wide array of chips. This should encourage use by
      customers who want to develop video-enabled consumer products in a short
      timeframe. We are doing this both by bolstering our team of engineers who
      integrate our codecs on chips and by developing relationships with chip
      companies and enabling them to perform such integration.




Although
      we expect that competition from Microsoft, H.264 developers, and others will
      continue to intensify, we
      expect
      that our video compression technology will remain competitive and that our
      relatively small size will allow us to innovate in the video compression field
      and respond to emerging trends more quickly than monolithic organizations,
      such
      as Microsoft and the MPEG consortium. We also focus on developing relationships
      with customers who find it appealing to work with a smaller company that is
      not
      bound by complex and rigid standards-based licenses and fee structures and
      that
      is able to offer sophisticated custom engineering services.




**Critical
      Accounting Policies and Estimates**





This
      discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
      are
      based on our unaudited consolidated financial statements that have been prepared
      under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
      generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management
      to
      make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
      liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
      date
      of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
      during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those
      estimates. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the
      related notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the discussion of
      our
      critical accounting policies and our Form 10K filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on March 23, 2007. Our critical accounting policies and
      estimates are:




·
            Revenue
                recognition


·
            Equity-based
                compensation


·
            Valuation
                of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived
                assets





*Revenue
      Recognition.* We
      currently recognize revenue from professional services and the sale of software
      licenses. As described below, significant management judgments and estimates
      must be made and used in determining the amount of revenue recognized in any
      given accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and
      timing of our revenue for any given accounting period depending upon judgments
      made by or estimates utilized by management.


-
          29 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


We
      recognize revenue in accordance with SOP 97-2, “SOFTWARE REVENUE RECOGNITION”
(“SOP 97-2”), as amended by SOP 98-4, “DEFERRAL OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SOP
      97-2, SOFTWARE REVENUE RECOGNITION” and SOP 98-9, “MODIFICATION OF SOP 97-2 WITH
      RESPECT TO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS” (“SOP 98-9”) and Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
      104 (“SAB 104”). Under each arrangement, revenues are recognized when a
      non-cancelable agreement has been signed and the customer acknowledges an
      unconditional obligation to pay, the products or applications have been
      delivered, there are no uncertainties surrounding customer acceptance, the
      fees
      are fixed and determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Revenues
      recognized from multiple-element software arrangements are allocated to each
      element of the arrangement based on the fair values of the elements, such as
      product licenses, post-contract customer support, or training. The determination
      of the fair value is based on the vendor specific objective evidence available
      to us. If such evidence of the fair value of each element of the arrangement
      does not exist, we defer all revenue from the arrangement until such time that
      evidence of the fair value does exist or until all elements of the arrangement
      are delivered.




Our
      software licensing arrangements typically consist of two elements: a software
      license and post-contract customer support (“PCS”). We recognize license
      revenues based on the residual method after all elements other than PCS have
      been delivered as prescribed by SOP 98-9. We recognize PCS revenues over the
      term of the maintenance contract or on a “per usage” basis, whichever is stated
      in the contract. Vendor specific objective evidence of the fair value of PCS
      is
      determined by reference to the price the customer will have to pay for PCS
      when
      it is sold separately (i.e. the renewal rate). Most of our license agreements
      offer additional PCS at a stated price. Revenue is recognized on a per copy
      basis for licensed software when each copy of the licensed software purchased
      by
      the customer or reseller is delivered. We do not allow returns, exchanges or
      price protection for sales of software licenses to our customers or resellers,
      and we do not allow our resellers to purchase software licenses under
      consignment arrangements.




When
      engineering and consulting services are sold together with a software license,
      the arrangement typically requires customization and integration of the software
      into a third party hardware platform. In these arrangements, we require the
      customer to pay a fixed fee for the engineering and consulting services and
      a
      licensing fee in the form of a per-unit royalty. We account for engineering
      and
      consulting arrangements in accordance with SOP 81-1, “ACCOUNTING FOR PERFORMANCE
      OF CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND CERTAIN PRODUCTION TYPE CONTRACTS,” (“SOP 81-1”). When
      reliable estimates are available for the costs and efforts necessary to complete
      the engineering or consulting services and those services do not include
      contractual milestones or other acceptance criteria, we recognize revenue under
      the percentage of completion contract method based upon input measures, such
      as
      hours. When such estimates are not available, we defer all revenue recognition
      until we have completed the contract and have no further obligations to the
      customer.




Encoding
      services consist of services that convert video and audio content into formats
      for delivery to end-users. Encoding services are generally provided under per
      unit or time and materials contracts. Under these contracts, we recognize
      revenue when services have been rendered and we have no further interest or
      obligation in the goods and services, which is generally the date on which
      the
      goods or services have been delivered to the customer.




*Equity-Based
      Compensation* .
      We
      adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R effective January 1, 2006, using the
      modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective method,
      non-cash compensation expense is recognized under the fair value method for
      the
      portion of outstanding share based awards granted prior to the adoption of
      SFAS
      123R for which service has not been rendered, and for any future share based
      awards granted or modified after adoption. Accordingly, periods prior to
      adoption have not been restated. We recognize share-based compensation cost
      associated with awards subject to graded vesting in accordance with the
      accelerated method specified in FASB Interpretation No.




-
          30 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


28
      pursuant to which each vesting tranche is treated as a separate award. The
      compensation cost associated with each vesting tranche is recognized as expense
      evenly over the vesting period of that tranche.




*Valuation
      of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets.* In
      June
      2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. *142* , *“Goodwill
      and Other Intangible Assets”* (“SFAS
      No. 142”). SFAS 142 requires goodwill and other intangible assets to be
      tested for impairment at least annually, and written off when
      impaired.




Long-lived
      assets and identifiable intangibles with finite lives are reviewed for
      impairment whenever events or c *h* anges
      in
      circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
      recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
      comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash
      flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered
      to be
      impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the
      carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets
      to be
      disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value
      less
      costs to sell. As of June 30, 2007, we believe that no such impairment has
      occurred.





**Results
      of Operations**





*Revenue.*





Revenue
      for the three months ended June 30, 2007 (as restated) was $2,369,000 as
      compared with $1,535,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Revenue
      for
      the six months ended June 30, 2007 (as restated) was $5,184,000 as compared
      with
      $2,752,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Revenue for the three and
      six
      months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was derived primarily from the sale of
      software licenses and engineering and consulting services. The increase in
      revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 is primarily
      attributed to increases in sales of our Flix and Adobe® Flash® related products.





*Operating
      expenses*





The
      Company's operating expenses consist of cost of revenue, research and
      development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses and
      equity-based compensation. Operating expenses for the three months ended June
      30, 2007 were $2,699,000 as compared to $3,082,000 for the three months ended
      June 30, 2006. Operating expenses were $5,318,000 for the six months ended
      June
      30, 2007 as compared to $5,448,000 for the six months ended June 30,
      2006.





*Cost
      of Revenue.*





Cost
      of
      revenue includes personnel and consulting compensation costs, related overhead
      expenses, stock-based compensation cost, fees paid for licensed technology,
      amortization of intangible assets recorded in connection with the Flix
      acquisition, costs associated with the Wildform Support and Maintenance
      Agreement and depreciation. Cost of revenue for the three months ended June
      30,
      2007 was $389,000 as compared to $705,000 for the three months ended June 30,
      2006. Cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $812,000
      as
      compared to $1,288,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease
      in
      expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 is primarily due
      to a
      decrease in the number of personnel hours spent on customer projects, costs
      associated with the Wildform Support and Maintenance Agreement which ended
      in
      October 2006 and stock-based compensation costs.




-
          31 -
 *Table
          of Contents*





*Research
      and Development.*




Research
      and development expenses, excluding equity-based compensation, consist of
      salaries and related expenses and consulting fees associated with the
      development and production of our products and services, operating lease costs
      and depreciation costs. Research and development expenses for the three months
      ended June 30, 2007 were $562,000 as compared to $214,000 for the three months
      ended June 30, 2006. Research and development expenses for the six months ended
      June 30, 2007 were $1,055,000 as compared to $439,000 for the six months ended
      June 30, 2006. The increase in expenses was primarily attributed to an increase
      in the number of personnel hours spent on research and development
      projects.





*Sales
      and Marketing.*





Sales
      and
      marketing expenses, excluding equity-based compensation, consist primarily
      of
      salaries and related costs, commissions, business development costs, tradeshow
      costs, marketing and promotional costs incurred to create brand awareness and
      public relations expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the three months
      ended June 30, 2007 were $614,000 as compared to $172,000 for the three months
      ended June 30, 2006. Sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended
      June
      30, 2007 were $1,210,000 as compared to $360,000 for the six months ended June
      30, 2006. The increase for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as
      compared with 2006 is primarily due to an increase in marketing personnel and
      related costs, commissions, tradeshow expenses and advertising and marketing
      costs.





*General
      and Administrative* .





General
      and administrative expenses, excluding equity-based compensation, consist
      primarily of salaries and related costs for general corporate functions
      including finance, human resources, management information systems, legal and
      facilities, outside legal and other professional fees and insurance. General
      and
      administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2007 were $980,000
      as compared with $1,280,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. General
      and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were
      $1,939,000 as compared with $2,540,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
      The decrease for the both the three and six-month periods is primarily due
      to a
      decrease in legal fees in connection with the Company’s internal investigation
      into facts and circumstances concerning investor and other communications made
      by the Company’s former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. There
      were also decreases in other professional fees for consulting services and
      recruiting and relocation expenses.





*Equity-Based
      Compensation.*





Equity
      based compensation, which is presented separately, was $154,000 and $302,000
      for
      the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. Equity-based
      compensation of $14,000 and $15,000 is included in cost of revenue for the
      three
      and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. Equity based compensation
      was
      $711,000 and $821,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006,
      respectively. Equity-based compensation of $52,000 and $109,000 is included
      in
      cost of revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
      The decrease is primarily due to the completion of amortization as options
      become fully vested coupled with a decrease of new grants in the current
      year.





*Interest
      and other income (expense), net.*





Interest
      and other income (expense), net consists of other income/expense and interest
      income/expense.





Other
      income/expense consists primarily of the change in the fair value of the
      derivative liability, gains and losses on marketable securities and the fair
      value of the change in the Midsummer/Rockmore warrants. Interest income/expense
      consists primarily of interest paid for capital lease obligations and debt,
      amortization of debt discount and interest earned on the Company’s cash
      balances.


-
          32 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


Interest
      and other income (expense), net was $(2,672,000) and $(3,585,000) for the three
      and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively as compared with $1,000 and
      $(26,000) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The
      increase of $2,673,000 and $3,558,000 in interest and other expense, net, for
      the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared with 2006, is primarily
      a result of the following:





·
            For
                the three months ended June 30, 2007 there was an increase in other
                expense, net of $2,753,000 which consists of primarily $2,668,000
                increase
                in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability, as a result
                of the
                Company’s increased stock price and an $86,000 charge for the fair value
                of the change in the exercise price of the Midsummer/Rockmore warrants
                from $0.77 to $0.69 partially offset by interest income of $83,000
                earned
                on cash invested in Treasury Bills.





·
            For
                the six months ended June 30, 2007 there was an increase in other
                expense,
                net of $3,669,000 which consists primarily of $3,582,000 increase
                in the
                fair value of the warrant derivative liability, as a result of the
                Company’s increased stock price, an $86,000 charge for the fair value of
                the change in the exercise price of the Midsummer/Rockmore warrant
                from
                $0.77 to $0.69 offset by a decreases in losses on marketable securities
                and net interest income of $111,000 earned on cash invested in Treasury
                Bills.





**A** **t
      June 30, 2007, the Company had approximately 38 full-time employees. The Company
      expects to hire employees as necessary in order to attain its strategic
      objectives**





**Liquidity
      and Capital Resources**





At
      June
      30, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of $10,369,000 as compared to
      $4,961,000 at December 31, 2006. At June 30, 2007 (restated), the Company had
      working capital of $10,764,000 as compared with $5,268,000 at December 31,
      2006.





Net
      cash
      provided by (used in) operating activities was $367,000 and $(1,668,000) for
      the
      six months ended June 30, 2007 (restated) and 2006, respectively. Although
      the
      Company had a larger net loss, the decrease in net cash used in operating
      activities is primarily related to a charge recorded for the increase in the
      warrant derivative liability and the change in accounts payable partially offset
      by the changes in accounts receivable and deferred revenue.




Net
      cash
      (used in) provided by investing activities was $(1,230,000) and $31,000 for
      the
      six months ended June 30, 2007 (restated) and 2006, respectively. The increase
      of net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30,
      2007
      is primarily a result of an increase in deferred acquisition costs associated
      with the pending Hantro acquisition, the purchase of marketable securities
      and
      fixed assets partially offset by an increase in proceeds from the sale of
      marketable securities.





Net
      cash
      provided by financing activities was $6,276,000 and $439,000 for the six months
      ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase is primarily
      attributable to a increase in proceeds received from the exercise of common
      stock options and warrants.





We
      currently have no material commitments for the next 12 months other than those
      under our operating lease arrangements. These arrangements consist primarily
      of
      lease arrangements for our office space in Clifton Park and Tarrytown, New
      York
      and in the UK. The aggregate required payments for the next 12 months under
      these arrangements are $186,000. Our most significant non-contractual operating
      costs for the next 12 months are compensation and benefit costs, insurance
      costs
      and general overhead costs such as telephone and utilities. During the next
      12
      months, we anticipate incurring approximately $900,000 per month in cash
      operating costs.


-
          33 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


The
      Company believes that existing funds are sufficient to fund its operations
      through June 30, 2008. The Company plans to increase cash flows from operations
      principally from increases in revenue generated from its compression technology
      services and products. The Company may also pursue additional financings. See
      “ *Management’s
      Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
      Risk
      Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results* ”
in
      the
      Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.





We
      have
      experienced significant operating losses and negative operating cash flows
      to
      date. Our management's plan to increase our cash flows from operations relies
      significantly on increases in revenue generated from our technology services
      and
      products. However, there are no assurances that we will be successful in
      effecting such increases. The market for distribution of broadband technology
      services is highly competitive. Additionally, our capital requirements depend
      on
      numerous factors, including market acceptance of our technology and services,
      research and development costs and the resources we spend on marketing and
      selling our products and services. Additionally, we continue to evaluate
      investments in complementary businesses, products and services, some of which
      may be significant.





We
      have
      incurred legal and accounting and other costs related to the Audit Committee
      review and restatement of our financial statements described above of
      approximately $1,530,000, as of May 30, 2008, of which approximately $373,000
      was expensed the first quarter of 2008 and an additional $1,157,000 will be
      expensed in the second quarter of 2008.  These costs are expensed in the
      period in which the legal, accounting and other services are provided and are
      recorded as general and administrative expenses. These costs will have a
      material adverse effect on our net loss for the period in which they are
      expensed and on our liquidity for the period in which they are paid. We
      anticipate that we will incur additional legal, accounting and other fees
      related to the Audit Committee review and restatement. We also will incur other
      fees and costs related to the execution of the remediation plan adopted by
      us
      after the conclusion of the Audit Committee review.  At this time, we
      cannot estimate the amount of additional legal, accounting and other fees and
      costs that may be incurred in the second quarter of 2008 and beyond to
      execute this remediation plan. The Company believes it continues to have
      sufficient cash and other resources available to meet working capital and other
      needs that might arise over the next twelve months.





**Off-Balance
      Sheet Arrangements**





The
      Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely
      to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes
      in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity,
      capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to
      investors.





**Impact
      of Recently-Issued Accounting Pronouncements**





On
      January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting
      Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
      Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
      measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement
      of
      a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation
      requires that the Company recognize the impact of a tax position in the
      financial statements if that position is more likely than not of being sustained
      on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides
      guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
      in
      interim periods and disclosure. In accordance with the provisions of FIN 48,
      any
      cumulative effect resulting from the change in accounting principle is to be
      recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit.





The
      Company is in the process of performing an analysis of the limitations on use
      of
      our net operating losses under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Once
      determined, the effect of the net


-
          34 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


operating
      loss limitation will be a reduction of the deferred tax asset and corresponding
      reduction of the related valuation allowance.





**Item
      3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
      Risk**





The
      Company does not currently have any material exposure to interest rate risk,
      foreign currency risk, exchange rate risk, commodity price risk or other
      relevant market rate or price risks. However, the Company does have some
      exposure to foreign currency rate fluctuations arising from maintaining an
      office for the Company's U.K. based, wholly-owned subsidiary which transacts
      business in the local functional currency. The U.K. based subsidiary does not
      conduct any sales and all their costs are funded in United States dollars.
      To
      date, the Company has not entered into any derivative financial instrument
      to
      manage foreign currency risk and is not currently evaluating the future use
      of
      any such financial instruments.





In
      addition, changes in the value of the Company’s common stock changes the fair
      value of the warrant derivative liability.





**Item
      4. Controls and Procedures**





**(a)**
            **Evaluation
                of Disclosure Controls and
                Procedures**





Our
        management had previously concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
        were effective as of June 30, 2007. However, in connection with the restatements
        of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the second and third
        quarters of 2007, as fully described in the Explanatory Note of this Amendment,
        our management re-evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation
        of
        our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the
        effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
        procedures as of June 30, 2007. The term "disclosure controls and procedures,"
        as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, or Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company
        that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
        the
        reports that the company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
        processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
        the
        SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
        limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
        to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under
        the
        Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company's management,
        including its principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely
        decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to
        the
        effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including
        the
        possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls
        and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures
        can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives
        and
        management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
        relationship of possible controls and procedures.





As
        described below, three **** material
        weaknesses were identified in our internal control over financial reporting.
        The
        Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 5 defines a
        material weakness as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, that result
        in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or
        interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Based on
        the
        re-evaluation and the identification of the material weaknesses in internal
        control over financial reporting described below, our Interim Chief Executive
        Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30,
        2007, and as of the date of this filing, our disclosure controls and procedures
        were not effective because of the following material weaknesses in our internal
        control over financial reporting that existed as of that
        date:





·
            *Revenue
                recognition procedures*-
                Our controls were not adequate to ensure that revenue was properly
                recognized when it was earned. Pursuant to American Institute of
                Certified
                Public


-
          35 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


Accountants’
      Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, *Software
      Revenue Recognition* (“SOP
      97-2”) and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”) one element of revenue
      recognition is consideration of whether the collectibility of sales revenue
      is
      reasonably assured ( *i.e.* ,
      whether
      the purchaser is creditworthy with respect to that transaction). We
      did
      not maintain effective procedures for the consideration of the probability
      that
      revenue is collectible. This control deficiency resulted in our incorrect
      recognition of revenue in our financial statements for the second and third
      quarters of 2007.





·
            *Control
                environment*-
                We did not maintain an effective control environment, specifically
                relating to our tone at the top. This material weakness was evidenced
                by
                the control tone and control consciousness of our former Chief Executive
                Officer and resulted in the override and the possibility of override
                of
                controls or interference with our policies, procedures and internal
                control over financial reporting.





·
            *Allowance
                for Doubtful Account Procedures*-
                Effective controls were not designed and in place to ensure that
                an
                appropriate analysis of receivables from customers was conducted,
                reviewed, approved and documented in order to identify and estimate
                required allowances for doubtful accounts in accordance with generally
                accepted accounting principles. This material weakness resulted in
                a
                misstatement of accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
                accounts on our balance sheet at the end of the third quarter of
                2007 and
                an understatement of our general and administrative expenses for
                the
                period.





In
        light
        of this conclusion, management conducted a review of our sales to all accounts
        for which revenue was recognized in fiscal 2007, including the accounts of
        Hantro, which we acquired in November 2007, for the purposes of determining
        that
        the criteria set forth in SOP 97-2 and SAB 104 was satisfied and that revenue
        was properly recognized for each account. Management
        concluded that, except for the accounts discussed above and the $42,000 that
        also was incorrectly recognized, the criteria s et
        forth
        in SOP 97-2 and SAB 104 was satisfied and revenue was properly recognized
        for
        all of these accounts.





(b)
            *Changes
                in Internal Controls*





Management
      had previously reported that there was no change in our internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2007,
      that materially affected, or was reasonably likely to materially affect, our
      internal control over financial reporting. However, in connection with the
      restatements of our consolidated financial statements for the second and third
      quarters of 2007, as fully described in the Explanatory Note of this Amendment,
      management determined that the material weaknesses described above existed
      as of
      June 30, 2007. As a result, we
      have
      taken certain steps, discussed below, and w e
      are in
      the process of finalizing a
      plan
      and timetable for the implementation of additional remediation measures to
      further address these material weaknesses ,
      also
      discussed below, and we anticipate that material changes will be effected
      in our internal control over financial reporting subsequent to the period
      covered by this report to remediate these material weaknesses.





**Remediation
      Initiatives** ****





In
      response to the identified material weaknesses, our management, with oversight
      from the Audit Committee, has taken certain actions related to their
      remediation. These actions have involved meetings among (i) our Chief Financial
      Officer, EVP, Legal and Business Affairs (and now Interim Chief Executive
      Officer and Chief Operating Officer) and certain members of our accounting
      staff
      and (ii) our Chief Financial Officer, EVP, Legal and Business Affairs (and
      now
      Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer) and the Audit
      Committee. Representatives of our independent registered public accountants
      and
      our consultant on Sarbanes-Oxley compliance attended certain of these meetings.
      Due to the connection between our former Chief Executive Officer and the
      material weakness that we identified in our control environment, he has had
      limited involvement in our remediation actions. Prior
      to
      the filing


-
          36 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


of
      this
      report, we have taken certain steps to remediate these material weaknesses
      and
      are in the process of finalizing a
      plan
      and timetable for the implementation of additional remediation
      measures . As
      we
      continue to work to finalize our plan to improve our internal control over
      financial reporting, we may determine to take additional remediation measures
      or
      determine to modify, or in appropriate circumstances not to complete, certain
      of
      the remediation measures described below.





From
      a
      control environment and tone at the top perspective, we have, prior to the
      filing of this report, taken the following remedial steps: (i) our
      Board
      of Directors sought and obtained the resignation of our former Chief Executive
      Officer, Bill
      Joll, from all positions with us and our subsidiaries, including as an officer,
      employee and director, on June 11, 2008 (he will remain with us as an advisor
      to
      the chief executive officer until September 30, 2008 to effect a smooth
      transition of customer relationships and business development opportunities);
      (ii) on June 10, 2008, our Board of Directors elected Matthew Frost, our EVP,
      Legal and Business Affairs, as Interim Chief Executive Officer effective upon
      Mr. Joll’s resignation and on June 11, 2008 elected Mr. Frost our Chief
      Operating Officer as well; and (iii) we have segregated the duties of our
      accounting personnel from our non-accounting personnel other than those whose
      involvement in accounting-related matters is specifically authorized. At the
      time of the filing of this report, we anticipate that we will implement the
      following additional remediation measures with respect to this material weakness
      as soon as reasonably practicable: (i) establishing an independent third party
      ethics hotline so that employees can anonymously report
      violations of our Code of Ethics and other employee concerns, and educating
      employees about the hotline process; and (ii) revising our Code of Ethics to
      emphasize the importance of adherence to our policies and procedures relating
      to
      accounting and financial reporting and internal control of financial reporting
      and the availability of the ethics hotline for the reporting of violations
      of
      our Code of Ethics and other employee concerns.





The
      remedial steps we have taken prior to the filing of this report to address
      the
      material weakness in our revenue recognition procedures, specifically our
      procedures for assessing whether the collectibility of revenue is reasonably
      assured prior to recognition, are as follows: (i) we have revised the process
      that we and our operating subsidiary will follow in assessing whether the
      collectibilty of revenue is reasonably assured, as well as in determining that
      the other requirements for recognizing revenue have been met, so that this
      assessment occurs at the outset of the arrangement and is thereafter reviewed
      and confirmed in connection with our period end closing and financial statement
      preparation process; (ii) we have revised, formalized and expanded the
      documentation of the procedures we and our operating subsidiary will follow
      with
      respect to assessing reasonable assuredness of collectibility, as well as
      determining that the other requirements for recognizing revenue have been met;
      including, specifically, enhancing and documenting our policy with respect
      to
      the types of information that can be used in establishing creditworthiness;
      and
      (iii) we have added a position to our accounting staff and will fill this
      position as soon as possible. We also terminated the firm with which the sales
      agent who provided us falsified documents was affiliated. In addition, in the
      first quarter of 2008, we added a certified public accountant to our accounting
      and financial reporting staff. The addition of trained staff will both provide
      additional assistance in the accounting department and should allow other
      members of the accounting staff to devote additional time to responsibilities
      connected with financial reporting.





With
      respect to addressing the material weakness in the design and operation of
      our
      procedures for estimating our allowance for doubtful accounts, prior to the
      filing of this report, we have enhanced, formalized and documented our
      procedures for analyzing our accounts receivable from customers so that we
      can
      appropriately estimate the collectibility of receivables at the end of a period
      based on aging categories and information related to collection efforts and
      formalized and documented timely review of that information, and sign
      off
      on the recommended allowance for doubtful accounts, by senior
      management.





At
      the
      time of the filing of this report, we anticipate that we will implement the
      following additional remediation measures as soon as reasonably practicable:
      (i)
      continued improvement to the documentation of the procedures we and our
      operating subsidiary will follow with respect to determining that
      the


-
          37 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


requirements
      for recognizing revenue have been met; (ii) Company-wide training (led by our
      Chief Financial Officer, with the assistance of our consultant on Sarbanes-Oxley
      compliance, our legal personnel and other accounting and financial reporting
      staff, as appropriate) to enhance awareness and understanding of standards
      and
      principles for accounting and financial reporting and internal control of
      financial reporting; and (iii) improve the processes and procedures around
      the
      completion and review of quarterly management representation letters The
      training we plan to implement will deal specifically with revenue recognition
      requirements and requirements related to accounts receivable and allowance
      for
      doubtful accounts and will include appropriate programs for senior management
      to
      emphasize the importance of accounting and financial reporting integrity. This
      training will address all of the material weaknesses we have identified.





The
      Audit
      Committee has directed management to develop a detailed plan and timetable
      for
      the implementation of the foregoing remedial measures (to the extent not already
      completed) and will monitor their implementation. In addition, under the
      direction of the Audit Committee, management will continue to review and make
      necessary changes to the overall design of our internal control environment,
      as
      well as policies and procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting. Our plan to remediate the material weaknesses
      in our internal control over financial reporting will be finalized and
      implemented as soon as reasonably practicable. We will continue to use external
      consultants to review our procedures and assist us in testing the effectiveness
      in our procedures on an on-going basis.





We
      believe that the steps we have heretofore taken have significantly improved
      our
      internal control over financial reporting. We are committed to remediating
      our
      material weaknesses and intend that, when finalized and fully implemented,
      our
      remediation measures will address the identified material weaknesses and will
      strengthen our overall internal control over financial reporting as well. We
      are
      committed to continuing to improve our internal control processes and will
      continue to diligently and vigorously review our financial reporting controls
      and procedures. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal
      control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional measures
      to address control deficiencies or determine to modify, or in appropriate
      circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures described
      above.





Remediation
      generally requires making changes to how controls are designed and then adhering
      to those changes for a sufficient period of time such that the effectiveness
      of
      those changes is demonstrated with an appropriate amount of consistency. We
      believe that we have made significant improvements in our internal control
      over
      financial reporting and are committed to remediating our material
      weaknesses.


-
          38 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




**PART
      II — OTHER INFORMATION**





**Item
      1.****Legal
      Proceedings**





**2006
      Internal Investigation**





On
      March
      2, 2006, On2 filed a Form 8-K, which disclosed that it had voluntarily reported
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that On2 had undertaken an
      internal investigation into facts and circumstances concerning investor and
      other communications made by its former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
      President. On2 has completed its internal investigation, and, on May 5, 2006,
      the Company’s outside law firm submitted its final report to the Board of
      Directors. On2 subsequently delivered the report to the SEC and the American
      Stock Exchange on May 9, 2006. To date, since delivery of the report, neither
      the SEC nor the AMEX has contacted On2 with respect to the investigation. The
      Company has agreed to work with the SEC and the American Stock Exchange in
      connection with any investigations conducted by them. The Company has not
      uncovered any evidence of financial impropriety, and thus the Company continues
      to believe that the investigation will have no effect on previously filed
      financial statements or lead to any restatement of reported financial
      results.





**Beijing
      E-World**





On
      March
      31, 2006, On2 commenced arbitration against its customer, Beijing E-World,
      relating to a dispute arising from two license agreements that On2 and Beijing
      E-World entered into in June 2003.





Under
      those agreements, On2 licensed the source code to its video compression (codec)
      technology to Beijing E-World for use in Beijing E-World’s video disk (EVD) and
      high definition television (HDTV) products as well as for other non-EVD/HDTV
      products. We believe that the license agreements impose a number of obligations
      on Beijing E-World, including the requirements that:





·
            Beijing
                E-World pay to On2 certain minimum quarterly payments; and




·
            Beijing
                E-World use best reasonable efforts to have On2’s video codec “ported” to
                (i.e., integrated with) a chip to be used in EVD players.




On2
      has
      previously commenced arbitration regarding the license agreements with Beijing
      E-World. In March 2005, the London Court of International Arbitration tribunal
      released the decision of the arbitrator, in which he dismissed On2’s claims in
      the prior arbitration, as well as Beijing E-World’s counterclaims, and ruled
      that the license agreements remained in effect; and that the parties had a
      continuing obligation to work towards porting On2’s software to two
      commercially-available DSPs.





Although
      almost two years have passed since the conclusion of the previous arbitration,
      the parties have nevertheless not completed the required porting of On2’s
      software to two commercially available DSPs.




On2’s
      current arbitration claim alleges that, despite its obligations under the
      license agreements, Beijing E-World has:





·
            failed
                to pay On2 the quarterly payments of $1,232,000, which On2 believes
                are
                currently due and owing; and




·
            failed
                to use best reasonable efforts to have On2’s video codec ported to a chip.




-
          39 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




**On2
      has requested that the arbitrator award it approximately $5,690,000 in damages
      under the contract and grant it further relief as may be just and equitable.**





Beijing
      E-World has appeared in the arbitration, although it has not yet filed any
      responses to On2’s filings in the proceeding. Following Beijing E-World’s
      appearance, it entered into an agreement with On2 pursuant to which Beijing
      E-World agreed by November 30, 2006 to pay On2 an amount in settlement equal
      to
      approximately 25% of the remaining unpaid portion of the license fees set forth
      in the license agreements. Upon payment of the settlement payment, the parties
      will terminate the arbitration, the license agreements will terminate, and
      On2
      will release Beijing E-World from all liability arising from the matters
      underlying the arbitration. As of the date of filing, Beijing E-World has not
      paid the amount agreed for settlement.





**Item
      1A****Risk
      Factors.**





In
      addition to those risks described in On2’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
      March 23, 2007, as amended April 30, 2007, May 10, 2007 and October 10, 2007,
      there are certain additional risks relating to the identification of material
      weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and our restatement
      of financial statements for the quarters ended June 30, 2007and September 30,
      2007. These risks include the following:





***In
      May 2008, our management identified three material weaknesses in our internal
      control over financial reporting and, as a result, has concluded that our
      disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of June 30, 2007 and
      September 30, 2007 and our internal control over financial reporting and our
      disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of December31,
      2007.***





As
      described in “Part II — Item 4. Controls and Procedures” of this report, in May
      2008, we identified three material weaknesses in our internal control over
      financial reporting as a result of which our Interim CEO and CFO concluded
      that
      our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of June 30,
      2007, due to the conditions that led to the identification of the material
      weaknesses. These material weaknesses were identified by management during
      its
      assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
      reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in
      connection with the preparation of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
      the year ended December 31, 2007. As a result of these material weaknesses,
      our
      Interim CEO and CFO also concluded that our internal control over financial
      reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of
      December31, 2007, due to the conditions that led to the identification of the
      material weaknesses. Prior to the filing of this report, we have taken certain
      steps to remediate these material weaknesses and are in the process of
      finalizing, and will present to the Audit Committee, a final plan and timetable
      for the implementation of remediation measures to further address these material
      weaknesses. The Audit Committee intends to monitor such implementation. Although
      we anticipate that these actions will remediate the material weaknesses we
      have
      identified and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting, we
      cannot assure that the finalized measures that we implement will effectively
      address such material weaknesses.





In
      addition, we or our independent auditors may identify further material
      weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the future. If a material weakness
      exists as of a future period year-end (including a material weakness identified
      prior to year-end for which there is an insufficient period of time to evaluate
      and confirm the effectiveness of the corrections or related new procedures),
      our
      management will be unable to report favorably as of such future period year-end
      to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we
      are
      unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective
      in any future period, or if we continue to experience material weaknesses in
      our
      internal control over


-
          40 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


financial
      reporting, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness
      of
      our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our stock price
      and
      potentially subject us to litigation.





Remedying
      the currently existing material weaknesses, as well as any additional
      significant deficiencies or material weaknesses that we or our independent
      auditors may identify in the future, may require us to incur significant costs
      and expend significant time and management resources.   If we fail to
      timely remedy any current or additional material weaknesses or significant
      deficiencies that we or our auditors may identify, we may be unable to comply
      with our periodic reporting requirements, accurately report our financial
      results, detect fraud or comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 all of which could result in a loss of investor
      confidence in the accuracy, timeliness and completeness of our financial
      reports. In addition, we can give no assurance that our independent auditors
      will agree with our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal
      control over financial reporting at that time. If we cannot produce reliable
      financial reports, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial
      information, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly,
      we may be unable to obtain additional financing to operate and expand our
      business, and our business and financial condition could be harmed.




***We
      experienced additional risks and costs as a result of the restatement of our
      financial statements.***





As
      a
      result of the restatement of our financial statements for the quarters ended
      June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007 , we
      have
      become subject to a number of additional risks and uncertainties, including
      substantial unanticipated costs for accounting and legal fees in connection
      with
      or related to the restatement. It is
      possible that we will become involved in proceedings in the future in relation
      to these restatements. In connection with such potential proceedings, any
      incurred expenses not covered by available insurance or any adverse resolution
      could have a material adverse effect on us. Any such proceedings could be time
      consuming and distract our management from the conduct of our business. In
      addition, the restatement was time-consuming and required us to incur
      significant incremental expenses and affected management’s attention and
      resources. Further, the measures being implemented to strengthen our internal
      control over financial reporting continue to require and will likely require
      in
      the future greater management time, company resource and outside professional
      resources to implement and monitor.




***Our
      success depends upon the continuing service and capabilities of our management
      team. The failure to retain existing management could have a material adverse
      effect on our business.***




Our
      success will be dependent on our continued ability to attract, retain and
      motivate highly skilled employees. On June 11, 2008, Bill Joll resigned
      as our CEO
      and
      as a member of our Board of Directors. During his service as our CEO, Mr. Joll
      had established relationships with many of our customers the disruption of
      which, as a result of his resignation, could adversely affect our business.
      On
      June 10, 2008, the Board of Directors appointed Matthew Frost, our EVP, Legal
      and Business Affairs, to serve as Interim Chief Executive Officer upon the
      resignation of Mr. Joll and on June 11, 2008 appointed him Chief Operating
      Officer as well. Mr. Joll will remain with us as an advisor to the chief
      executive officer until September 30, 2008 to effect a smooth transition of
      customer relationships and business development opportunities. The Board of
      Directors is currently conducting a search for a permanent CEO. Leadership
      transitions can be inherently difficult to manage and may cause disruption
      to
      our business or further turnover in our workforce or management team. The loss
      of services of one or more other members of senior management, or the inability
      to attract a qualified permanent CEO, would likely have a material adverse
      effect on our business. We are not protected by any key-man or similar life
      insurance for any of our executive officers.




-
          41 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




In
      addition to those risks described in On2’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
      March 23, 2007, as amended April 30, 2007, May 10, 2007 and October 10, 2007,
      there are certain additional risks relating to On2’s proposed share exchange
      transaction pursuant to which On2 intends to acquire Hantro Products Oy. These
      risks include the following:





**RISK
      FACTORS RELATING TO THE SHARE EXCHANGE**




***The
      number of shares of On2’s common stock that Hantro securityholders will receive
      in the share exchange is based on the market value of On2’s common stock. As a
      result of daily changes in the market value of On2’s common stock before the
      completion of the share exchange, it will not be possible to ascertain the
      exact
      number of On2 shares to be issued in the share exchange until
      closing.***




Under
      the
      terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, at the closing of the share exchange
      On2
      will pay $6,841,775 in cash and issue shares of its common stock, par value
      $.01
      per share, directly to the Hantro securityholders. The amount of shares will
      be
      calculated using the volume-weighted average price of On2’s common stock for the
      10 trading days prior to the closing. Based on the closing price of On2’s common
      stock on August 10, 2007, the shares to be issued to the Hantro securityholders
      at the closing prior to adjustment would represent approximately 18% of On2’s
      currently outstanding common stock, after giving effect to the Hantro share
      exchange.





If
      the
      closing share price in the share exchange is between $1.50 and $2.50 per share,
      the total value of the shares to be issued by On2 at the closing will equal
      $45,000,000 less the cash component of $6,841,775. If the closing share price
      is
      $1.50 or less, On2 will issue approximately 25,440,000 shares. If the closing
      share price is $2.50 or more, On2 will issue approximately 15,300,000 shares.





***Although
      the number of shares that On2 is obligated to issue*** **to the Hantro securityholders is limited, the value of those shares is not,
      and,
      as a result, the additional goodwill reported on On2’s balance sheet as a result
      of On2’s acquisition of Hantro may become impaired at a future date and
      accordingly require On2 to record a loss in the amount of the impairment in
      its
      results of operations.**




The
      dollar value of the purchase price associated with the shares that On2 will
      issue to the Hantro securityholders will vary with the market price of On2’s
      common stock. For example, if the volume weighted average price per share for
      On2’s common stock for the 10 trading days prior to the closing is $2.50, at the
      closing, On2 will issue approximately 15.3 million shares of its common stock
      to
      the Hantro securityholders in the share exchange, with a corresponding value
      of
      approximately $38.25 million. Following the end of 2007, based on the
      performance of Hantro’s product lines during 2007, On2 may pay the Hantro
      securityholders additional consideration of up to 12,500,000 shares of On2’s
      common stock, adding an additional amount to the purchase price. For example,
      if
      the full amount of the Contingent Consideration becomes due, and the market
      price per share for On2’s common stock is $2.00at the time of payment, an
      additional $25,000,000 will be added to the purchase price. Although On2 has
      not
      yet valued the acquisition of Hantro for its accounting purposes, it is likely
      that substantially all of the purchase price, or $63.25 million in the above
      example, will be allocated to goodwill. Under generally accepted accounting
      principles, On2 will test the goodwill at regular intervals to determine whether
      the carrying value of goodwill associated with the Hantro acquisition exceeds
      the fair value. To the extent that it does, On2 will be forced to make a
      corresponding reduction in the carrying value of its goodwill, and will also
      be
      required to take a corresponding charge against earnings for the period in
      which
      it recorded the impairment. The size of the impairment could be significant,
      and
      could have a material adverse effect on the business and financial position
      of
      On2, as well as on the trading price of its shares.




The
      market value of On2’s common stock has varied since On2 and Hantro entered into
      the Share Exchange Agreement and will continue to vary in the future due to
      changes in the business, operations or




-
          42 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


prospects
      of On2, market assessments of the business combination, regulatory
      considerations, market and economic considerations, and other factors both
      within and beyond the control of On2 and Hantro.




**The
      share exchange is subject to the receipt of certain waivers from Hantro’s bank
      lenders and a Finnish governmental entity relating to the repayment of certain
      indebtedness of Hantro or of grants to Hantro, as a result of the share
      exchange. Such lenders or such entity could impose conditions that could have
      an
      adverse effect on On2 or Hantro or could cause abandonment of the share
      exchange.**




Completion
      of the share exchange is conditioned upon the receipt of waivers from Hantro’s
      bank lenders and a Finnish governmental agency that has granted funds to Hantro
      so that Hantro’s existing credit facilities and grants will remain in place
      without acceleration or requirement of repayment.




On2
      has
      agreed that it will guarantee Hantro’s outstanding lines of credit up to a limit
      of €3,653,000. Since On2 currently has no long-term debt, the guarantees may
      adversely affect On2’s financial position.




**Any
      delay in completing the share exchange may significantly reduce the benefits
      expected to be obtained from the business combination.**




In
      addition to the required waivers from third parties, the share exchange is
      subject to other conditions beyond the control of On2 and Hantro that may
      prevent, delay or otherwise materially adversely affect its completion,
      including On2’s ability to raise $20,000,000 in one or more equity financing
      transactions. On2 and Hantro cannot predict whether and when these conditions
      will be satisfied. Further, the requirements for obtaining the required waivers
      from third parties could delay the completion of the share exchange or prevent
      it from occurring. Any delay in completing the share exchange may significantly
      reduce the synergies and other benefits that On2 and Hantro expect to achieve
      from successfully completing the share exchange and integrating their respective
      businesses within the expected timeframe.




**Customer
      uncertainties related to the business combination could adversely affect the
      businesses, revenues and gross margins of On2, Hantro and the combined
      company.**




In
      response to the announcement of the share exchange or due to ongoing uncertainty
      about the business combination, customers of On2 or Hantro may delay or defer
      purchasing decisions or elect to switch to other suppliers. In particular,
      prospective customers could be reluctant to purchase the products and services
      of On2, Hantro or the combined company due to uncertainty about the direction
      of
      the combined company’s offerings and willingness to support existing products.
      To the extent that the business combination creates uncertainty among those
      persons and organizations contemplating purchases, or a significant group of
      customers delays, defers or changes purchases, the revenues of the combined
      company would be adversely affected. Customer assurances may be made by On2
      and
      Hantro to address their customers’ uncertainty about the direction of the
      combined company’s product and related support offerings, which may result in
      additional obligations of On2, Hantro or the combined company. In addition,
      the
      announcement of the share exchange may cause prospective licensees of Hantro’s
      intellectual property to delay or defer licensing decisions resulting in a
      decline in Hantro’s licensing revenues which could have a significant impact on
      the profitability of Hantro and the combined company. Quarterly revenues and
      net
      earnings of On2, Hantro or the combined company could be substantially below
      expectations of market analysts, and a decline in the companies’ respective
      stock prices could result.




**If
      the share exchange is not completed, On2 will have incurred substantial costs
      that may adversely affect On2’s financial results and operations and the market
      price of On2’s common stock.**




The
      current trading price of On2’s common stock reflects a market assumption that
      the share exchange will be completed. If the share exchange is not completed,
      the price of On2’s common stock may decline. In addition, On2 has incurred and
      will incur substantial costs in connection with the




-
          43 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


proposed
      share exchange. These costs are primarily associated with the fees of attorneys,
      accountants and On2’s financial advisors. In addition, On2 has diverted
      significant management resources in an effort to complete the share exchange.
      If
      the share exchange is not completed, On2 will have incurred significant costs,
      including the diversion of management resources, for which it will have received
      little or no benefit.




In
      addition, if the share exchange is not completed, On2 may experience negative
      reactions from the financial markets and On2’s suppliers, customers and
      employees. Each of these factors may adversely affect the trading price of
      On2’s
      common stock and On2’s financial results and operations.




**RISK
      FACTORS RELATING TO THE COMBINED COMPANY FOLLOWING THE BUSINESS
      COMBINATION**




***The
      combined company may fail to realize the benefits expected from the business
      combination, which could adversely affect the value of On2’s common
      stock.***




The
      business combination involves the integration of On2 and Hantro, two companies
      that have previously operated independently. On2 and Hantro entered into the
      Share Exchange Agreement with the expectation that, among other things, the
      business combination would enable the combined company to consolidate support
      functions, leverage its research and development, patents and services across
      a
      larger base, and integrate its workforce, to create opportunities to achieve
      cost savings and to become a stronger and more competitive company. Although
      On2
      and Hantro expect significant benefits to result from the business combination,
      there can be no assurance that the combined company will actually realize these
      or any other anticipated benefits of the business combination.




The
      value
      of On2’s common stock following completion of the share exchange may be affected
      by the ability of the combined company to achieve the benefits expected to
      result from the business combination. On2 and Hantro currently operate in
      several countries, with a combined workforce of approximately 110 employees.
      Achieving the benefits of the business combination will depend in part upon
      meeting the challenges inherent in the successful combination and integration
      of
      global business enterprises of the size and scope of On2 and Hantro. The
      challenges involved in this integration include the following:




·
            demonstrating
                to customers of On2 and Hantro that the business combination will
                not
                result in adverse changes to the ability of the combined company
                to
                address the needs of customers, or the loss of attention or business
                focus;




·
            coordinating
                and integrating independent research and development teams across
                technologies and product platforms to enhance product development
                while
                reducing costs;




·
            combining
                product offerings;




·
            consolidating
                and integrating corporate, information technology, finance, and
                administrative infrastructures;




·
            coordinating
                sales and marketing efforts to effectively position the capabilities
                of
                the combined company and the direction of product development;
                and




·
            minimizing
                the diversion of management attention from important business
                objectives.




If
      the
      combined company does not successfully manage these issues and the other
      challenges inherent in integrating businesses of the size and complexity of
      On2
      and Hantro, then the combined company may not achieve the anticipated benefits
      of the business combination and the revenues, expenses, operating




-
          44 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


results
      and financial condition of the combined company could be materially adversely
      effected. For example, goodwill and other intangible assets could be determined
      to be impaired which could adversely impact the company’s financial results. The
      successful integration of the On2 and Hantro businesses is likely to require
      significant management attention both before and after the completion of the
      business combination, and may divert the attention of management from business
      and operational issues of On2, Hantro and the combined company.




***Uncertainties
      associated with the business combination may cause a loss of employees and
      may
      otherwise materially adversely affect the businesses of On2 and Hantro, and
      the
      future business and operations of the combined
      company.***




The
      combined company’s success after the business combination will depend in part
      upon the ability of the combined company to retain key employees of On2 and
      Hantro. In some of the fields in which On2 and Hantro operate, there are only
      a
      limited number of people in the job market who possess the requisite skills.
      Each of On2 and Hantro has experienced difficulty in hiring and retaining
      sufficient numbers of qualified engineers in parts of their respective
      businesses. Current and prospective employees of On2 and Hantro may experience
      uncertainty about their post-business combination roles with the combined
      company following the share exchange. This may materially adversely affect
      the
      ability of each of On2 and Hantro to attract and retain key management, sales,
      marketing, technical and other personnel. In addition, key employees may depart
      because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration
      or a
      desire not to remain with the combined company following the share exchange.
      The
      loss of services of any key personnel or the inability to hire new personnel
      with the requisite skills could restrict the ability of On2, Hantro and the
      combined company to develop new products or enhance existing products in a
      timely manner, to sell products to customers or to effectively manage the
      business of On2, Hantro and the combined company.




**General
      economic weakness and geopolitical factors may harm the combined company’s
      operating results and financial condition.**




The
      results of operations of the combined company will be dependent to a large
      extent upon the global economy. Geopolitical factors such as terrorist
      activities, armed conflict or global health conditions that adversely affect
      the
      global economy may adversely affect the operating results and financial
      condition of the combined company.




**The
      combined company will conduct a significant amount of activity outside of the
      United States, and will be exposed to legal, business, political and economic
      risks associated with its international operations.**




Each
      of
      On2 and Hantro derive a substantial portion of their revenue from sales of
      products shipped to locations outside of the United States. In addition, On2
      and
      Hantro manufacture a significant portion of their products outside of the United
      States and will be dependent on non-U.S. suppliers for many parts and services.
      The combined company may also pursue growth opportunities in sales, design
      and
      manufacturing outside of the United States. Operations outside of the United
      States are subject to a number of risks and potential costs that could adversely
      affect revenue and results of operations, including:




·
            political,
                social and economic instability;




·
            fluctuations
                in currency exchange rates;




·
            exposure
                to different legal standards, particularly with respect to intellectual
                property;




·
            natural
                disasters and public health
                emergencies;




-
          45 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


·
            nationalization
                of business and blocking of cash
                flows;




·
            trade
                and travel restrictions;




·
            imposition
                of governmental controls and
                restrictions;




·
            burdens
                of complying with a variety of foreign
                laws;




·
            import
                and export license requirements and
                restrictions;




·
            unexpected
                changes in regulatory requirements;




·
            foreign
                technical standards;




·
            difficulties
                in staffing and managing international
                operations;




·
            international
                trade disputes;




·
            difficulties
                in collecting receivables from foreign entities or delayed revenue
                recognition; and




·
            potentially
                adverse tax consequences.




***The
      trading price of the combined company’s stock may be affected by factors
      different from those currently affecting the prices of On2 or Hantro common
      stock.***




Upon
      completion of the share exchange, the Hantro securityholders will become holders
      of On2’s common stock. The results of operations of the combined company, as
      well as the trading price of On2’s common stock after the share exchange, may be
      affected by factors different from those currently affecting Hantro’s results of
      operations.




**The
      combined company will face uncertainties related to the effectiveness of
      internal controls.**




Public
      companies in the United States are required to review their internal control
      over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
      It
      should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated,
      can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives
      of
      the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based
      in
      part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because
      of
      these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no
      assurance that any design will achieve its stated goal under all potential
      future conditions, regardless of how remote.




There
      can
      be no assurance that the integration of On2 and Hantro, and their respective
      internal control systems and procedures, will not result in or lead to a future
      material weakness in the combined company’s internal controls, or that the
      combined company or its independent registered public accounting firm will
      not
      identify a material weakness in its internal controls in the future. A material
      weakness in internal control over financial reporting would require management
      and the combined company’s independent public accounting firm to evaluate their
      internal controls as ineffective. If internal control over financial reporting
      are not considered adequate, On2 may experience a loss of public confidence,
      which could have an adverse effect on its business and stock price.




**The
      combined company may need to obtain additional cash to operate its business
      and
      to be able to execute its business plan.**




Since
      its
      inception, On2 has incurred significant losses and negative cash flow from
      operations, and as of June 30, 2007, On2 had an accumulated deficit of
      approximately $128 million. On June 30, 2007,




-
          46 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


On2
      had
      cash reserves of approximately $10.4 million. Since its inception, Hantro has
      also incurred significant losses and negative cash flow from operations. As
      of
      June 30, 2007, Hantro had cash reserves of approximately $96,000. On2 plans
      to
      raise an additional $20 million of cash from sales of its equity securities
      prior to the closing under the Share Exchange Agreement.




During
      the remainder of fiscal 2007, the combined company expects to meet its working
      capital obligations and other cash requirements with cash derived from the
      sale
      of products and services and from cash reserves, including the funds raised
      by
      the sale of equity securities. There can be no assurance, however, that cash
      derived from the sale of products and services will be sufficient for its
      operating needs or that it will be able to achieve profitability on a consistent
      basis. If cash used in operations is higher than anticipated and it is unable
      to
      secure additional funding, On2 would be required to further reduce expenditures
      to preserve cash, and effect further reductions in its corporate infrastructure,
      either of which could have a material adverse effect on the ability of the
      combined company to continue current levels of operations.




Even
      if
      the combined company obtains additional working capital in the near future,
      to
      the extent that operating expenses increase or it needs additional funds to
      make
      acquisitions, develop new technologies or acquire strategic assets, the need
      for
      additional funding may be accelerated and there can be no assurances that any
      such additional funding can be obtained on terms acceptable to On2, if at
      all.




**If
      the combined company cannot generate sufficient positive cash flows from its
      operations in the future, the combined company’s operating results and its stock
      price may be negatively impacted.**




Prior
      to
      the closing under the Share Exchange Agreement, neither On2 nor Hantro generated
      sufficient revenues to offset their operating costs. Moreover, as they continue
      to expand their product and service offerings to maintain competitive advantage,
      the combined company may be required to incur additional costs to hire and
      retain additional personnel, license complementary third party technology for
      use in their proprietary technology or expand both their international and
      domestic presence to enter new markets. These costs may significantly increase
      the combined company’s level of monthly operating expenses. Failure to generate
      sufficient capital through both their revenue streams and financings may require
      the combined company to execute additional corporate restructurings, scale
      back
      product or service offerings or limit the markets into which they enter. Any
      of
      these items, or a combination thereof, could have a harmful effect on On2’s
      operating results and its stock price.




**On2
      and Hantro have a history of losses and negative cash flow from operations,
      and
      anticipate continued losses.**




On2
      and
      Hantro have not achieved profitability, and it is a possibility that the
      combined company will continue to incur operating losses for the foreseeable
      future as it funds operating and capital expenditures in implementing its
      business plan. The combined company’s business model assumes that consumers will
      be attracted to and use broadband-specific video compression technology to
      access content available on customer Web sites or over proprietary networks
      that
      will, in turn, allow the combined company to provide its technology solutions
      to
      customers. The combined company’s business model is not yet proven, and it may
      never achieve or sustain profitability, further, there can be no assurance
      that
      its operating losses will not increase in the future. The combined company’s
      business strategy may be unsuccessful and they may not be able to adequately
      address all or any of these risks. Even if the combined company is able to
      achieve profitability, it may be unable to sustain, or increase, its
      profitability. In either case, the combined company’s operating results and
      liquidity would be adversely affected.




-
          47 -
 *Table
          of Contents*




**On2’s
      stock price may fluctuate for reasons beyond its control, which could result
      in
      losses on your investment in On2’s common stock.**




Fluctuations
      in the market price of common stock may adversely affect On2’s access to capital
      and financing, and its ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
      Historically, On2’s common stock price has fluctuated widely, with a 52-week
      range as of August 9, 2007 of $0.74 to $3.99. On2 expects fluctuations to
      continue in the future for a number of reasons, including:




·
            quarterly
                variations in its operating
                results;




·
            competitive
                announcements;




·
            the
                operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors
                may deem comparable to On2;




·
            news
                relating to trends in its markets;
                and




·
            changes
                in financial estimates by securities analysts or failure to meet
                analyst
                estimates.




In
      addition, the stock market generally has experienced significant price and
      volume fluctuations, and the market prices of companies in the combined
      company’s industry have been highly volatile. Due to the volatility of the stock
      market generally, the price of the combined company’s common stock could
      fluctuate for reasons beyond its control.




***If
      the combined company is unable to continue to attract, retain and motivate
      highly skilled employees, it may not be able to execute its business plan.***




The
      combined company’s ability to execute its growth plans and be successful depends
      on its continuing ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled
      employees. As the combined company continues to grow, it will need to hire
      additional personnel in all operational areas. On2 may be unable to retain
      its
      key employees or attract, assimilate or retain other highly qualified employees
      in the future. On2 and Hantro have from time to time in the past experienced,
      and the combined company expects to continue to experience in the future,
      difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate
      qualifications. If the combined company does not succeed in attracting new
      personnel or retaining and motivating their current personnel, customers could
      experience delays in service, which could, in turn, adversely affect On2’s
      operating results and revenue. Additionally, retention of highly skilled
      employees may require additional personnel costs or the issuance of certain
      equity compensation. These factors would reduce profitability and the price
      of
      the combined company’s common stock.




**Strategic
      acquisitions could have a dilutive effect on your investment. Failure to make
      accretive acquisitions and successfully integrate them could adversely affect
      the combined company’s future financial results.**




As
      part
      of its growth strategy, On2 may seek to acquire or invest in complementary
      businesses or technologies. On2’s goal is to make such acquisitions, integrate
      these acquired assets into its operations, and expand the market for On2’s
      products and services and possibly offer additional products or services. The
      process of integrating these acquired assets into On2’s operations may result in
      unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, and may absorb significant
      management attention that would otherwise be available for the ongoing
      development of the combined company’s business. The combined company cannot be
      certain that the anticipated benefits of any acquisitions will be realized.
      Acquisitions also involve other risks, including entering geographic markets
      in
      which the combined company may have no or limited prior experience and the
      potential loss of key employees.




In
      addition, future acquisitions by the combined company could result in
      potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt
      and
      contingent liabilities, and amortization expenses related to intangible assets,
      any of which could materially and adversely affect the combined
      company’s




-
          48 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


operating
      results and financial position. The combined company cannot be certain that
      it
      will be able to obtain the capital necessary to consummate acquisitions or
      alliances on satisfactory terms, if at all. Further, any businesses that the
      combined company acquires will likely have its own capital needs, which may
      be
      significant, and which the combined company could be called upon to satisfy
      independently of the acquisition price.




**Much
      of the combined company’s technology will rely on owned or licensed intellectual
      property, and if such rights are not protected from the use of others, including
      potential competitors, the combined company’s business prospects may be
      harmed.**




The
      failure to protect the combined company’s intellectual property could seriously
      harm its businesses and prospects because the combined company believes that
      its
      technology is unique and that the proprietary nature of the combined company’s
      intellectual property is critical to its success. If the combined company’s
      prospects are harmed, the price of the combined company’s common stock may
      decline because it may be less attractive to investors. The combined company’s
      efforts to protect its intellectual property through trademarks, copyrights,
      patents, trade secret laws, access to information and confidentiality agreements
      may not be adequate to protect the combined company’s proprietary rights. Even
      with all of these precautions, it could be possible for someone else to either
      copy or otherwise obtain and use the combined company’s proprietary information
      without authorization or to develop similar technology independently. In
      addition, effective trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may not
      be
      available in every country in which the combined company’s products and services
      are made available, and policing unauthorized use of its proprietary information
      is difficult and expensive. The combined company cannot be sure that the steps
      it takes will prevent misappropriation of the combined company’s proprietary
      information. In the future, the combined company may need to go to court to
      either enforce their intellectual property rights, to protect their trade
      secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
      others. That litigation might result in substantial costs and diversion of
      resources and management attention.




Although
      the combined company does not currently license material third party
      technologies, the loss of which could adversely affect our business, we do
      from
      time to time license from third parties technologies incorporated into some
      of
      our products and services. As we continue to introduce new services that
      incorporate new technologies, we may be required to license additional
      technology from others. We cannot be sure that these third-party technology
      licenses will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if
      at
      all.




**The
      broadband video services and technology markets are highly competitive, and
      the
      combined company’s failure to compete effectively could hurt its revenue and
      reduce its gross margins and profitability.**




The
      combined company faces significant competition in the market for its technology
      and services. In establishing the combined company’s broadband strategy, it
      faces a number of strong, firmly entrenched competitors, who are currently
      providing similar services to low-bandwidth users and high-bandwidth users
      and
      have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than the combined
      company. These and other companies have announced plans to provide broadband
      video-based services and technology. In addition to competition from other
      Internet content and technology companies, well-established media distribution
      companies, particularly in the cable television and satellite markets, have
      established, and continue to seek to establish, interactive, on-demand digital
      services through the development of sophisticated digital set-top technology
      and
      related back-end server systems. Those competitors could cause the combined
      company to lose customers and impair its ability to attract new
      customers.




-
          49 -
 *Table
          of Contents*


**If
      the combined company fails to keep pace with technological advances in its
      industry, or if its pursues technologies that do not become commercially
      accepted, customers may not buy the combined company’s products and the combined
      company’s revenues may decline.**




The
      combined company’s future success depends, in large part, on its ability to use
      leading technologies effectively, to develop its technological expertise, to
      enhance its existing services and to develop new services that meet changing
      customer needs on a timely and cost-effective basis. The combined company is
      unable to predict which technological developments will challenge our
      competitive position or the amount of expenditures that will be required to
      respond to a rapidly changing technological environment. The combined company’s
      failure to respond in a timely and effective manner to new and evolving
      technologies could have a negative impact on its operating results and financial
      condition.




**Regulatory
      changes in the Internet industry involve uncertainties, and the resolution
      of
      these uncertainties could adversely affect the combined company’s business by
      raising its costs or reducing potential revenues.**




Although
      the combined company is not currently subject to direct regulation by any
      governmental agency other than rules and regulations that apply to businesses
      generally and any export and import controls that may apply to its products,
      laws and regulations specifically pertaining to the Internet are new and
      developing. These laws, when enacted, may require the combined company to comply
      with new procedures or limit the scope of its technology or services, which
      could raise the combined company’s expenses or reduce its revenues. The
      developing laws and regulations govern matters such as online content,
      intellectual property, user privacy, e-commerce, information security and
      taxation. Moreover, the combined company may be liable to third parties for
      any
      content that they encode, distribute or make available on their website if
      that
      content violates a third party’s intellectual property rights or violates any
      applicable laws, such as obscenity laws or defamation laws. In addition, the
      applicability of existing laws to the Internet is uncertain and
      evolving.




**The
      combined company has never paid common stock dividends and does not anticipate
      paying common stock dividends in the foreseeable future.**




The
      combined company currently intends to retain earnings, if any, to support their
      growth strategy. The combined company does not anticipate paying dividends
      on
      their common stock in the foreseeable future.




**Item
      6.****Exhibits****and
      Reports on Form 8-K.**





31.1
            Certification
                by the Interim Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
                the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2
            Certification
                by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1
            Certification
                of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.2
            Certification
                of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





-
            50 -
 *Table
            of Contents*




**SIGNATURES**





In
      accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused
      this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
      authorized.





On2
                Technologies, Inc.June
                27, 2008
            
            (Registrant)(Date)(Signature)
              Anthony
                Principe
              Senior
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)


- 51
      -