21742 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 1, 2001 / Notices

at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or

bond for) estimated antidumping or

countervailing duties required on those

entries at the time of entry, or

withdrawal from warehouse, for

consumption and to continue to collect

the cash deposit previously ordered.

This notice is not required by statute

but is published as a service to the

international trading community.

Dated: April 24, 2001.

Holly A. Kuga,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration, Group II.

[FR Doc. 01–10845 Filed 4–30–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–827]

Certain Cased Pencils From the

People’s Republic of China: Extension

of Time Limit for Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul

Stolz at (202) 482–4474, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

Time Limits

Statutory Time Limits

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires

the Department to make a preliminary

determination within 245 days after the

last day of the anniversary month of an

order for which a review is requested

and a final determination within 120

days after the date on which the

preliminary determination is published.

However, if it is not practicable to

complete the review within these time

periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act

allows the Department to extend the

time limit for the preliminary

determination to a maximum of 365

days and for the final determination to

180 days (or 300 days if the Department

does not extend the time limit for the

preliminary determination) from the

date of publication of the preliminary

determination.

Background

On January 26, 2000, the Department

published a notice of initiation of

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on certain

cased pencils from the People’s

Republic of China, covering the period

December 1, 1998 through November

30, 1999 (65 FR 4228). On January 9,

2001, we published the preliminary

results of review (66 FR 1638). In our

notice of preliminary results, we stated

our intention to issue the final results of

this review no later than May 9, 2001.

Extension of Time Limit for Final

Results of Review

We determine that it is not practicable

to complete the final results of this

review within the original time limit.

Therefore the Department is extending

the time limit for completion of the final

results until no later than July 8, 2001.

See Decision Memorandum from

Howard B. Smith to Thomas F. Futtner,

dated concurrently with this notice,

which is on file in the Central Records

Unit, Room B–099 of the main

Commerce building.

This extension is in accordance with

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Dated: April 23, 2001.

Thomas F. Futtner,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration, Group II.

[FR Doc. 01–10764 Filed 4–30–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Boston College; Notice of Decision on

Application for Duty-Free Entry of

Electron Microscope

This is a decision pursuant to section

6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and

Cultural Materials Importation Act of

1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15

CFR part 301). Related records can be

viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in

Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th and Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Docket Number: 01–008. Applicant:

Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA

02467. Instrument: Electron Microscope,

Model JEM–2010F. Manufacturer: JEOL

Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at

66 FR 16445, March 26, 2001. Order

Date: December 1, 2000.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as the

instrument is intended to be used, was

being manufactured in the United States

at the time the instrument was ordered.

Reasons: The foreign instrument is a

conventional transmission electron

microscope (CTEM) and is intended for

research or scientific educational uses

requiring a CTEM. We know of no

CTEM, or any other instrument suited to

these purposes, which was being

manufactured in the United States at the

time of order of the instrument.

Gerald Z. Zerdy,

Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs

Staff.

[FR Doc. 01–10857 Filed 4–30–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Application for Duty-Free Entry of

Scientific Instrument

Pursuant to section 6(c) of the

Educational, Scientific and Cultural

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part

301), we invite comments on the

question of whether an instrument of

equivalent scientific value, for the

purposes for which the instrument

shown below is intended to be used, is

being manufactured in the United

States.

Comments must comply with 15 CFR

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and

be filed within 20 days with the

Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S.

Department of Commerce, Washington,

DC 20230. Applications may be

examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.

in Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Docket Number: 01–010. Applicant:

University of Colorado, Department of

MCD Biology, 347 UCB, Boulder, CO

80309–0347.

Instrument: Electron Microscope,

Model Tecnai F20.

Manufacturer: FEI Company, The

Netherlands. Intended Use: The

instrument is intended to be used for

the study of the structure of biological

materials in three dimensions.

Sometimes these will be components of

cells such as organelles or filaments;

sometimes large molecules within cells.

In addition, the structure of molecules

will be studied at very high resolution

by extracting and preparing them so that

many copies of the molecule can be

imaged at once and these images

averaged. The goal of these

investigations is to achieve a detailed

understanding of the 3-dimensional

structure of some cellular component,

which in turn can be used to increase

the understanding of the component.