alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2010117EN.01023501.xml

| 6.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 117/235 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 117/235

---

Wednesday 25 March 2009Aerodromes, air traffic management and air navigation services ***I

P6_TA(2009)0170

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 March 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 in the field of aerodromes, air traffic management and air navigation services and repealing Council Directive 2006/23/EC (COM(2008)0390 – C6-0251/2008 – 2008/0128(COD))

2010/C 117 E/45

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0390),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0251/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0515/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

Wednesday 25 March 2009P6_TC1-COD(2008)0128

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 25 March 2009 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 in the field of aerodromes, air traffic management and air navigation services and repealing Directive 2006/23/EC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No ...)

---
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S
NO. WR-43,437-03
IN RE ARTIMUS LORENZO F EGAN S, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1169987-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has f

iled a motion for leave to file an application for a wr it of mandamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. Relator filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 262nd District Court of Har ris County , the District Court enter ed a t i m el y o rder designating issues on Dec ember 27, 2011, more than 180 day s have passed since the date the State rec eived the application, and the application has not been timely forwa rded to this Court a s mandated by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is order ed to file a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec o rd on such habeas corpus application, subm itting proof of t he date of2

rec eipt by the State showing 1 80 day s has not yet elapse d, or stating that Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Har ris County
. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropriate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.
Filed: Apr il 20, 2016 Do not publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AMIN INGRAM,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 112 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

              CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Properties, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert H.
Eder, Chairman of the Board and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                           /s/ Robert H. Eder
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Robert H. Eder
                           Chairman of the Board and Principal Executive Officer
                           March 21, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           643,973
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,005,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,557,801
<INVENTORY>                                    4,034,246
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,976,528
<PP&E>                                         8,578,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                   670,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                22,061,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,625,737
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (585,065)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  22,061,322
<SALES>                                        7,186,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,186,853
<CGS>                                          1,835,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,835,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,046,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               659,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,342,377)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,342,377)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,342,377)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
ARI, LTD.                                    3299 S. W. 9th Avenue
                                             P.O. Box 22748
                                             Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33335-2748
                                             Fax: (954) 760 99 44
                                             Tel: (954) 764 06 04




Mr. Enrique Bekerman                         January 31, 1997
Vice-President, Operations
BMC Industries, Inc.
3301 S.W. 9th Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316                     Re: Lease Amendment


Dear Enrique,

We hereby agree with your request that the lease amendment agreement be extended
through August 31, 1997.   All other terms and conditions shall remain the same.

Please sign below acknowledging this new extension agreement.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

ARI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP              BMC INDUSTRIES, INC.            
                                                                     
                                                                     
   /s/ Roberta Glaser                By:  /s/ Enrique M. Bekerman    
----------------------------            ------------------------------- 
Roberta Glaser                       Date:       1/31/97             
Real Estate Investment Manager           -------------------------------
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


November 22, 2019


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 452 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:




The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on November 21, 2019, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-233548) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.






	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
Exhibit
23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-37261, 33-69596, 33-69598, 33-61558, 333-79443, 333-08994,
333-42635, 333-89971, 333-112527 and 333-138524) and Form S-3 (No. 333-137998)
of Southern Union Company of our report dated February 26, 2009 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Southern Union Company, which appears in this Form
10-K.





/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP








Houston,
Texas


February
26, 2009
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

h0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

148848

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148848

COA: 319100

Washtenaw CC: 12

- 001316

- FH

COURTNEY SHANAE McCOY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CENTRAL RESERVE LIFE CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000215403
<NAME> Central Reserve Life
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        69,831,327
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       11,995,728
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         12,078,666
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              91,310,781
<CASH>                                       9,102,020
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             210,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         209,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,329,039
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             30,192,055
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                              35,125,467
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        5,222,968
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              8,599,067
<COMMON>                                     2,018,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,282,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,329,039
<PREMIUMS>                                 233,168,529
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          6,454,038
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             149,527
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  37,000
<BENEFITS>                                 165,472,603
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     59,834
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        68,329,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,947,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,442,618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,504,607
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,504,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

January Term 2014

JEWEL GRIER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-0947

[July 2, 2014]

Appeal from order denying rule 3.800 motion the Circuit Court for the 

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 01-7886CF 10A.

Jewel B. Grier, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Harris, 129 So. 3d 1166, 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

STEVENSON, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-64286) of Knight-Ridder, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-127104, 333-110794, 333-106492, 333-89016, 333-80163 and 333-68171), of our reports dated March 1, 2006,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Knight-Ridder, Inc., Knight-Ridder, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Knight-Ridder, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 25, 2005. 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP 

March 6, 2006 

San Jose, California
Exhibit








Form 10-Q


Exhibit 10.4


CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS ([***]), 
HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE THE INFORMATION (I) IS NOT MATERIAL AND 
(II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.


AMENDMENT FOUR TO MANUFACTURING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Amendment Four (“Amendment Four”) to the Manufacturing Services Agreement (“Agreement”) by and between Flextronics Telecom Systems, Ltd and its Affiliates (“Flextronics”) and Nutanix, Inc. and Nutanix Netherlands B.V. (together known as “Nutanix”) is entered into as of the date of last signature below (“Amendment Effective Date”).  Collectively Flextronics and Nutanix are referred to as the “Parties”. 
RECITALS
A.    The Parties entered into the Agreement as of November 11, 2017.
B.    The parties now desire to amend the Agreement to allow certain subsidiaries of Nutanix to purchase under the Agreement.  
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
		
	1.
	The Parties agree that certain geographically identified subsidiaries of Nutanix, Inc. and Nutanix Netherlands B.V. (“Data Center Subsidiary”) shall be allowed to purchase Products under the Agreement.  For such purchases, the respective rights and obligations of Nutanix and Flextronics shall extend to each Data Center Subsidiary as if it were Nutanix for those purchases, except that the use of the Products shall be limited to the Data Center Subsidiary’s internal use globally.   The geographically identified subsidiaries shall be those that are named in Attachment 1 to this Amendment Four.


		
	2.
	No other changes are made to the Agreement, and following the Amendment Effective Date, all references to the “Agreement” shall include the amendments incorporated by this Amendment Four.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date.   
	
		
	NUTANIX INC. 
By:  Aaron Boynton     /s/ Aaron Boynton
Title:  VP, Corporate Controller
Date:  September 4, 2019
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
FLEXTRONICS TELECOM SYSTEMS, LTD.    
By:  Manny Marimuthu         /s/ Manny Marimuthu
Title:  Director
Date: 08-24-2019

	NUTANIX NETHERLANDS, B.V.
By:  Aaron Boynton     /s/ Aaron Boynton
Title:  Managing Director A
Date:  September 4, 2019

	NUTANIX NETHERLANDS, B.V.
By:  Servais Willie Ngabo  /s/ Servais Willie Ngabo
Title:  Managing Director B
Date:  September 4, 2019















Attachment 1: 
List of Geographically Identified Nutanix Data Center Subsidiaries
[***]
# The Use of Plus-One Codes

**Posted: Sept. 26, 2018**

            -   Find similar NFIRSGrams:
            - Coding
            - Data Analysis

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

This NFIRSGram explains how to create and define plus-one codes in the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS).

## Important points for plus-one codes

              -  A plus-one code is used to further define the base code.
              -  Plus-one codes are analyzed at the state and national levels by their base code only.
              -  Use a plus-one code in place of the base code when it applies.
              -  Don’t select a plus-one code and the base code for use on the same incident.
              -  Don’t select multiple plus-one codes of the same base code for the same incident.

As a part of data quality checks, the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) has discovered that 2,169 fire incidents reported in 2017 have duplicate actions taken codes as a result of the use of plus-one codes created by departments. This is almost a 25 percent reduction compared to 2014 when the number of incidents was 2,922.

When departments create a plus-one code, they are further defining the base code, but the base code definition still applies.

### Example

If a department creates a plus-one code of 111 with a definition of “Extinguishment by fire service personnel – Using CAFS,” it still means “11 — Extinguishment by fire service personnel.” Thus, the department should not select 11 and 111 as a possible action taken code, as the department has already indicated that it extinguished the fire with its plus-one code.

Likewise, if a department has more than one plus-one code for 11, such as 111, 112, 113, etc., it should not select more than one such code for the incident.

When departments need to create multiple plus-one codes for a single base code, the departments should contact USFA or their state agency for guidance on what they are attempting to collect and the best way of collecting that data.

At the state and national levels, the plus-one code is only defined by the base code. Thus, 111, 112, 114 and 11F all mean 11 at the state and national levels. Using more than one of these codes on the same incident skews the analysis of those incidents. The only time a plus-one code is analyzed at the state or national level is when the state or national group creates a specific plus-one code for use.

While this NFIRSGram is focused on actions taken, the same reasoning can be applied to any multicoded field in which departments can select more than one code and create a plus-one code in the system. The plus-one code is used to further define the base code, but it also means the same thing as the base code.

For more information about NFIRS, please contact the NFIRS Support Center: Monday – Friday between 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. ET, at 888-382-3827 or by email at fema-nfirshelp@fema.dhs.gov.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 20.1

                         MAP OF THE COMPANY'S PARCELS IN
                        DOWNTOWN PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND

         The map in Form 10-KSB is a plan of a portion of downtown Providence,
Rhode Island, which indicates those parcels owned by the Company in that area
known as "Capital Center" and immediately adjacent thereto. A legend contains
the Parcel Number, the Parcel Size and the Development on the Parcels as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 PARCEL NO        SQUARE FEET
 ---------        -----------
 CAPITAL
 CENTER           PARCEL SIZE                            DEVELOPMENT OF PARCELS
<S>               <C>                            <C>

    2               92,000
    3S              48,000..................     13 Story Office Building -
                                                 235,000 gross square feet
    3W              35,000
    3E              24,000
    4W              46,000
    4E              22,000
    5               54,000..................     8 Story Luxury Apartment Building -
                                                 454,000 gross square feet
    6              276,000
    7A              76,000..................     330 Car Public Parking Garage
    8               36,000..................     4 Story Office Building - 114,000 gross
                                                 square feet
    9               72,000
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OUTSIDE
CAPITAL
CENTER
<S>                 <C>
   21                3,000
   22               15,000
</TABLE>