alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0634

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JAMES MONTGOMERY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2023

07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0634
Exhibit 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Alan E. Casnoff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of DVL, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


/s/ Alan E. Casnoff
----------------------------
Alan E. Casnoff
Chief Executive Officer
March 23, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Annual Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marshall Chadwell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



/s/   Marshall Chadwell
----------------------------
Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
July 28, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 22217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11039]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Agricultural Advisory Committee; Ninth Renewal

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has determined to renew 
again for a period of two years its advisory committee designated as 
the ``Agricultural Advisory Committee.'' The Commission certifies that 
the renewal of the advisory committee is in the public interest in 
connection with duties imposed on the Commission by the Commodity 
Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 1, et seq., as amended.
    The objectives and scope of activities of the Agricultural Advisory 
Committee are to conduct public meetings and submit reports and 
recommendations on issues affecting agricultural producers, processors, 
lenders and others interested in or affected by agricultural 
commodities markets, and to facilitate communications between the 
Commission and the diverse agricultural and agriculture-related 
organizations represented on the Committee.
    Commissioner David D. Spears serves as Chairman and Designated 
Federal Official of the Agricultural Advisory Committee. The 
Committee's membership represents a cross-section of interested and 
affected groups including representatives of producers, processors, 
lenders and other interested agricultural groups.
    Interested persons may obtain information or make comments by 
writing to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette 
Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 25, 2001, by the Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-11039 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                         |                                                                                     |                                    |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                |                               |
| Date: September                21, 2005 |                                                                                     | /s/ ROBERT                T. FABER |
|                                         |                                                                                          |
|                                         | Robert                  T. Faber*President and Chief Executive                  Officer* |

----
(85 South. 822)

#### KING v. CENTRAL HARDWARE CO.

(4 Div. 876.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 3, 1920.)

Attachment 4&wkey;308(3) — Record of judgment for plaintiff against defendant not admissible in claim suit.

Where attachment was levied on personalty claimed by a third person, the trial court erred in admitting on trial of the claim suit the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant.

Certiorari to- Court of Appeals.

Action by the Central Hardware Company against A. G. Anderson for rent and advances, in which attachment was levied upon certain real property which was claimed by Henry King. On second trial of the claim suit, there was judgment for plaintiff (85 South. 821), and claimant brings certiorari.

Reversed and remanded.

See, also, 200 Ala. 209, 75 South. 967.

A. Whaley and Baldwin & Murphy, all of Andalusia, for appellant.

A. R. Powell, of Andalusia, and G. W. Reeves, of Florala, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This court is of *the*opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant. Taliaferro v. Lane, 23 Ala. 369; Abraham v. Nicrosi, 87 Ala. 173, 6 South. 293. This question was not raised or adjudicated in this case on the former appeal. 200 Ala. 209, 75 South. 967.

Reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity herewith.

All (the Justices concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               261,197
<PP&E>                                       1,369,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,460,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,220,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,992,088
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,460,885
<SALES>                                        365,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365,139
<CGS>                                          578,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,491,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,126,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,126,745)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Jeffrey A. McCandless, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:  February 13, 2004 |                      |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCandless |
|                      | Jeffrey A. McCandless     |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,404
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,485
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,233)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,656
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,742
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,846)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,340)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,506)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.95)


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
IN THE MATTER OF THE PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF JOHN ALLEN WHITAKER,

Petitioner. PER CURIAM — John Whitakerwas convicted in 2004 following a jury trial of 

### aggravated murderin the first degree and conspiracytocommit murderin the first degree in Snohomish County Cause No. 02-1-02368-6. He was sentenced to life imprisonment 

### without the possibility ofparole. This courtaffirmed Whitaker's convictions on appeal. See No. 54834-4-I. Whitaker filed a personal restraint petition alleging, among other 

### things, thathis rightto a public trial was violated when sixjurors wereindividually questioned in a closed courtroom during voir dire. 

### The State concedes that recent Washington Supreme Court authoritysettles the 

### following issues: (1)jury voirdire is an established proceeding towhich the publictrial right applies, and (2) closing the courtroom during voir direwithoutfirst conducting a 

### Bone-Club1 analysis is a structural error, requiring reversal ofa defendant's convictions. See State v. Paumier, 176 Wn 2d 29. 35-37. 288 P.3d 1126 (2012): State v. Wise, 176 

### Wn.2d 1, 19-20, 288 P.3d 1113 (2012). The State furtherconcedes that this case is ) No. 61980-2-1 r*o COO t~j :>^ ) DIVISION ONE !Z^'-' ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION —4 3^
Tb> to f-n 

## ) FILED: JUN 1 7 2013 9?

crv CD
—

1State v. Bone-Club. 128 Wn.2d 254, 906 P.2d 325 (1995).No. 61980-2-1/2 analogous to In re Pers. Restraint of Morris, 176Wn.2d 157, 288 P.3d 1140(2012). In Morris, the trialcourt privately questioned 14jurors inchambers without considering the Bone-Club factors. In re Morris, 176 Wn2d at 161-62. In the context of resolving Morris's personal restraint petition, the Supreme Court held that appellate counsel's failure to raise the court closure issue on appeal was both deficient and prejudicial because the error would have been presumed prejudicial on direct review. In re Morris, 176 Wn.2d at 166- 68. The State concedes that as in Morris, Whitaker is entitled to a new trial because 

### appellate counsel did not raise the courtroom closure issue on appeal. In re Morris, 176 Wn.2dat168. 

### We accept the State's concession, reverseWhitaker's convictions, and remandfor

a new trial. 

# £
WE CONCUR: 

# furn\c— 

### ?

# k^L 

# A-4.&.J
#### Riddell, Fox, Holroyd & Jackson, P. C., Appellant, v County of Onondaga et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Gill, Korff & Assoc, v County of Onondaga*(152 AD2d 912). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated November 15, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1971 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-233302) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 15, 2019
China Packaging Technologies, Inc. - Exhibit 10.6 - Filed by
   newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.6 

Form of Purchase Agreement 

(English Summary) 

	Parties to Contract 	
                     
         Great Shengda as Buyer and Wuxi Rongcheng Paper Co., Ltd. as
      Vendor 

	  	
       

	Details of Products 	
                         The
      size, amount and price depend on the Buyer’s order and will be confirmed
      by the Vendor. 

	  	
       

	Standard of Quality 	
                         According
      to the GB13024-91 Standard of the state or the agreement of the two
      parties. 

	  	
       

	Location of Delivery 	
                     
         Warehouse of the Vendor. 

	  	
       

	Standards of checking 
and accepting 	
                         According
      to the GB13024-91 Standard of the state or the agreement of the two
      parties. 

	  	
       

	Time limit of objection 	
                         The Buyer
      should send a written notice to the Vendor if the products are found less
      than the contract-amount nor can fit the quality standards in 10 days
      after the Buyer receive the products. 




	Payment 	1. 	Pay on the 20th of the
      month when the order is placed; pay on the 20th of next 
	  	  	month. Monthly payment at 60
      days. 
	  	2. 	Pay by Bank Acceptance. 
	  	3. 	Freight is paid by the Buyer
  



	Dispute Resolution 	the local court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.5



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         The undersigned, a director of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., hereby
constitutes and appoints Stephen J. Tomassi and Gregory D. Waller, or either of
them, his true and lawful attorneys and agents, each with full power and
authority to act as such without the other, to do any and all acts and things
and to execute any and all instruments which either one of said attorneys and
agents may deem necessary or advisable to enable said Corporation to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), as amended; and including
specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, full power and authority
to each of said attorneys and agents to sign the name of the undersigned to the
Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001, and any
amendment(s) thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to the requirements of the Act, the undersigned hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and delivered these
presents as of the 7th day of December 2001.





                                                        /s/ William E.B. Siart
                                                     ---------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

        I, Robert A. Reynolds, Jr., President and Principal Executive Officer of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 9, 2010

----