alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [ID-080-1210-PG]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Upper Columbia—Salmon Clearwater District, Idaho.

# ACTION:

Notice of Resource Advisory Council Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the meeting of the Upper Columbia—Salmon Clearwater District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) on Tuesday, May 9, 2000 at the District Office, 1808 N. Third St., Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. A telephone patch will be available at the Salmon-Challis National Forest Headquarters office located on U.S. 93, one mile south of Salmon, Idaho.

Agenda items include an update from the Recreation Sub-Group on its findings concerning the potential use of funds collected through the Salmon-Challis National Forest's Salmon River fee demonstration project and identification of future issues for RAC consideration. The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (PDT). The public may address the Council during the public comment period from 10:20 a.m.-10:50 a.m. (PDT). Those wishing to address the Council should contact Ted Graf, RAC Coordinator, at (208) 769-5004 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

All Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council, or written statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to make oral statements, a per-person time limit may be established by the Designated Federal Official.

The Council's responsibilities include providing recommendations concerning long-range planning and establishing resource management priorities.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ted Graf (208)769-5004.

Dated: April 13, 2000.

Ted Graf,

Acting District Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-9889  Filed 4-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
**Welcome Aboard!**The command is located on Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads in Norfolk, Virginia. Your tour of duty here will be both rewarding and career enhancing. The Hampton Roads area is a wonderful and historical place to work and play for you, your family and friends.**Command Sponsor Coordinator**Phone Number: 757-836-4045 ATTN: Sponsor CoordinatorCommander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250Norfolk, VA 23551-2487For emergencies, USFLTFORCOM employs a 24-hour watch officer that can be contacted by calling 757-836-5397. 

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

New England Business Service, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 2-
69422, 2-72662, 33-38925, 33-43900 and 33-56227 and 333-32719 of New England
Business Service, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-26499 of
New England Business Service, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated August 4,
1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of New England Business
Service, Inc. for the year ended June 28, 1997.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 1997
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 19 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 19 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 19 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 19 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 19 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 19 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05729-JSR Document 19 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 7 of 7
|   | (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /S/ Marcia R. Martin    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Marcia R. Martin        |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                    |
|   |   | June 21, 2010           |
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6450 

To repeal provisions of the recently enacted health care reform law that 

require the extension of dependent coverage to adult children under 

age 26. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal provisions of the recently enacted health care reform law that require the extension of dependent coverage to adult children under age 26. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sixth Health Insurance 

5 Protects America—Can’t Repeal IT (HIPA–CRIT) Act’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6450 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM REQUIRE2 MENTS FOR EXTENSION OF DEPENDENT 

3 ADULT CHILDREN COVERAGE. 

4 The provisions of the Patient Protection and Afford5 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148), insofar as such Act 

6 requires under section 2714(a) of the Public Health Serv7 ice Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–14(a)) a group health plan and 

8 a health insurance issuer offering group or individual 

9 health insurance coverage that provides dependent cov10 erage of children to continue to make such coverage avail11 able for an adult child until the child turns 26 years, are 

12 hereby repealed, effective as of the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 02-10255

_______________________

MELODY GIRARD,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL PAYROLL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

Civil Docket #5:00-CV-428-C

_________________________________________________________________

January 14, 2003

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal of an

award of damages and attorneys fees for Title VII sexual harassment

perpetrated against Ms. Girard while she worked at a Chili’s

restaurant in Lubbock, Texas. We have carefully reviewed the

briefs, the jury verdict and pertinent portions of the record.
2

Having done so, we are constrained to reverse and render judgment

in favor of appellant Brinker International.

This case is largely resolved by the answers contained in

the jury verdict. We may assume without deciding that the verdict

is sustained by the evidence at least with respect to Girard’s

allegations that her co-workers at Chili’s sexually harassed her

and that Brinker did not make a good faith effort to prevent or

promptly correct the sexual harassment. Nevertheless, and

critically, the jury also found that Girard was not constructively

discharged from employment. Indeed, the record gives every

indication that she simply quit. 

In light of this finding, there is no basis for the award

of lost wages and employment benefits to Girard. Because the award

of actual damages cannot be sustained, Girard also loses her

punitive damage award. This court has held in a related context,

involving the Fair Housing Act, that a punitive damages award

cannot stand in the absence of an actual damage award unless a

constitutional right has been violated. Louisiana ACORN Fair

Housing v. Leblanc, 211 F.3d 298, 303 (5th Cir. 2000). In so

deciding, we examined caselaw from this and other circuits

interpreting various federal rights statutes. The reasoning of

Louisiana ACORN applies here.

Finally, since Girard’s damage awards fail, there is no

predicate for the court’s award of attorneys fees, because “the
3

plaintiff’s level of success can critically influence the proper

amount of fees.” Thomas v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, 297

F.3d 361, 373 (5th Cir. 2002).

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment is REVERSED and

RENDERED in favor of Brinker.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hoover J. Jaramillo, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), both rendered March 4, 1985, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree under indictment No. 1545/84, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under indictment No. 1570/84, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The record on appeal does not support the defendant’s contention that the sentencing court declined to impose lesser sentences due to a mistaken belief that it lacked authority to impose sentences more lenient than the prosecutor’s sentencing recommendations, which recommendations were the terms of the plea bargain. Here, the nature and scope of the defendant’s criminal acts, the pertinent facts appearing in the record, and the results of the presentence investigation furnish a sound basis for the court’s imposition of sentence in accord with the prosecutor’s recommendations *(see, People v Gittelson,*25 AD2d 265, 272, *affd*18 NY2d 427). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
National Fire Academy 

Academic Partnerships uwo.sh/ferm

NFA course 

number NFA course title

Transfer 

credit 

hours

College/university course

F/W0803 Leadership I for Fire & EMS: Strategies for 

Company Success 1

F/W0805 Leadership III for Fire and EMS: Strategies for 

Supervisory Success 1

All three (0081, 0082, 0083) must be met to transfer to 

FERM 335 Fire & Emergency Services Leadership & Ethics 

for 3 credits

F/W0646 Leadership in Supervision: Creating Environments 

for Professional Growth 1

F/W0647 Leadership in Supervision: Perspectives in Thinking 1

F/W0804 Leadership II for Fire and EMS: Strategies for 

Personal Success 1

All three (0270, 0271, 0272) must be met to transfer to 

FERM 335 Fire & Emergency Services Leadership & Ethics 

for 3 credits

F/W0648 Leadership in Supervision: Frameworks to Success 1

R/N0645 Leadership in Supervision 3 FERM 335 Fire and Emergency Services Leadership & 

Ethics

R0384 Transitional Safety Leadership 3 FERM 351 Occupational Safety & Health in Emergency 

Services

R0388 Applications of Leadership & the Culture of Safety 3 FERM 351 Occupational Safety & Health in Emergency 

Services

R/N0154,

R/N0822 Safety Program Operations 3 FERM 351 Occupational Safety & Health in Emergency Services

R0387 Analytical Tools for Decision Making 3 FERM 402 Community Risk Reduction for Fire & 

Emergency Services

R0385 Applications in Community Risk Reduction 3 FERM 402 Community Risk Reduction for Fire and 

Emergency Services

R0150 Management of Emergency Medical Services 3 FERM 408 Management of Emergency Medical Services

R0123 Executive Development 3 MPA Elective A

R0125 Executive Leadership 3 MPA Elective B

R0274 Executive Analysis of Community Risk Reduction 3 MPA Elective C
National Fire Academy 

Academic Partnerships uwo.sh/ferm

NFA course 

number NFA course title

Transfer 

credit 

hours

College/university course

R0306 Executive Analysis of Service Operations in 

Emergency Management 3 MPA Elective D

R/N0333 Fire Service Financial Management 3 MPA-753 Public Budgeting & Financial Management
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                                                 [LETTERHEAD OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN]

IMCO Recycling Inc.
Central Tower at Williams Square
Attn: Mr. Paul V. Dufour
Mr. Robert Holian
5215, North O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1500
Irving, Texas 75039

USA

March 22, 2002

Consent of Independent Auditors

"We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-26641, Form S-8 No. 33-34745, Form S-8 Nos. 33-76780,
333-00075, and 333-71339, Form S-8 Nos. 333-07091 and 333-71335, Form S-8 No.
333-55962 and Form S-8 No. 333-81949) pertaining to the Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan of IMCO Recycling Inc., the IMCO Recycling Inc. Amended and Restated
Stock Option Plan, the IMCO Recycling Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the IMCO
Recycling Inc. Annual Incentive Program the IMCO Recycling Inc. 2000 Restricted
Stock Plan and the IMCO Recycling Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
respectively, of our report dated January 25, 2002, with respect to the
financial statements of VAW-IMCO Guss und Recycling GmbH included in the Annual
Report (10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001."

Yours very truly,

Arthur Andersen
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft
Steuerberatungsgesellschaft mbH

/s/ Gerd Lutzeler                               /s/ M. Senghaas
Gerd Lutzeler                                   ppa. Marcus Senghaas
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

The C2 Database Panel Group Meeting will meet in San Francisco, CA and Hickam AFB, Hawaii on May 14-18, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and discuss the direction of the study. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 552b(c) of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and (4) thereof. 

For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404. 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-10877 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-01-U
Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-1 No. 333-120094) pertaining to the registration ofpreviously issued but unregistered securities, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-81938)pertaining to the registration of additional shares for the Grubb & Ellis Employee Stock PurchasePlan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-63136) pertaining to the Grubb & Ellis Company2000 Stock Option Plan, the Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Barry M. Barovick,dated as of May 15, 2001 and the Employment Agreement between the Company and Barry M. Barovickdated as of May 15, 2001, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-67729) pertaining to theGrubb & Ellis Company Deferred Compensation Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-73331) pertaining to the Grubb & Ellis 1998 Stock Option Plan and the 1993 Stock Option Planfor Outside Directors of Grubb & Ellis Company, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42741)pertaining to the Grubb & Ellis Company 1990 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan and Grubb &Ellis Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-71580, 33-35640and 2-98541) pertaining to the 1990 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, as amended, and theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-71484) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan for OutsideDirectors of Grubb & Ellis Company, of our report dated September 1, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Grubb & Ellis Company included in the Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2005./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPChicago, Illinois
ese_Ex4_1(a)


		
			EXHIBIT 4.1(a)
		

		
			ESCO Technologies Inc.
		

		
			Description of Common Stock
		

		
			Registrant’s outstanding equity consists solely of shares of common stock having the typical characteristics of common stock of a Missouri public corporation, including:
		

		
			–     One vote per share on all matters to be voted on by the shareholders (however, the approval of certain matters requires a supermajority vote pursuant to Missouri law or as set forth in the Registrant’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws)
		

		
			–     The right to participate pro rata in such dividends as may be declared by the Board of Directors, subject to the preferential rights of preferred shares, if any (none are currently outstanding)
		

		
			–     The right to participate pro rata in any proceeds available upon liquidation of the Registrant, subject to the preferential rights of preferred shares, if any (none are currently outstanding)
		

		
			–     Shares carry no preemptive right to subscribe for additional issuances of securities
		

		
			–     Shares are not subject to involuntary redemption by the Registrant
		

		
			–     Cumulative voting in the election of directors is prohibited
		

		
			–     There are no restrictions on alienability (however, certain holders may be personally subject to restrictions imposed by contract or applicable securities laws)
		

		
			–     There are no provisions discriminating against holders or prospective holders who own or would own a substantial amount of securities.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Fellowships Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Fellowships Advisory Panel (American Jazz Masters category) will be 
held by teleconference from 3:00 p.m.--4:30 p.m. on Tuesday May 22, 
2001 from Room 703 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW, Washington, DC 20506.
    This meeting is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 12, 2000, 
these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection 
(c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment 
for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: April 23, 2001.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Operations, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 01-10633 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-U
(77 Hun, 192.)

#### SMITH et al. v. AMERICAN TURQUOISE CO.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

April 13, 1894.)

Pleading—Sufficiency of Answer—How Questioned. The sufficiency of the defense contained in an answer cannot be raised by a- motion to strike out portions of the answer, but only by demurrer.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by Alfred H. Smith and another against the American Turquoise Company. From an order denying a motion to strike out portions of the answer, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT and PARKER, JJ.

Franklin Bien, for appellants.

David McClure, for respondent.

VAN BRUNT, P. J.

It would seem, from an examination of the papers upon this appeal, that the plaintiffs seek upon this motion to test the sufficiency of a defense set up in the answer. It is true that the motion is directed to a paragraph of the defense, but it is *330evident that in this attack upon this paragraph it is sought to have it adjudged that the defense set up is bad. If we understand the theory of the Code, such an issue must be disposed of upon demurrer, and cannot be determined by motion. If the defense set up is available, the paragraph objected to cannot be considered to be either irrelevant, redundant, or scandalous; and it is only upon the theory that the defense cannot prevail that the paragraph becomes irrelevant. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.