alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1 List of Subsidiaries





Xian Xilan Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Peoples' Republic of China ("PRC") (VIE)





Jingbian Xilan Liquified Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the PRC (subsidiary of the VIE)





Shaanxi Xilan Natural Gas Equipment Co. Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the PRC





Henan Xilan Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the PRC (subsidiary of the VIE)





Shaanxi Xilan Auto Body Shop Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the PRC (subsidiary of the VIE)





Lingbao Yuxi Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the PRC (subsidiary of the VIE)





Henan CNPC Kunlun Xilan Compressed Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the PRC (subsidiary of the VIE)





Xilan Energy Co., Ltd., a private company having a share capital formed under the laws of Hong Kong Special Administration Region of the PRC





Hubei Xilan Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the PRC (subsidiary of the VIE)





Hanchuan Makou Yuntong Compressed Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the PRC (subsidiary of a subsidiary of the VIE)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 07-18

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

O R D E R

Pursuant to Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules), the Court 

created a Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel) to consider disciplinary 

cases coming before the Court. The Court's March 11, 2011 Resolution regarding the Standing 

Panel provides that on "[e]ach August 1, the longest serving member of the Standing Panel will be 

removed automatically from the Standing Panel with regard to any new cases assigned to the 

Standing Panel." It further provides that "the Clerk shall designate as the next member of the 

Standing Panel the regular active judge with highest precedence among judges who have not yet 

been designated as a member of the Standing Panel, or . . . the regular active judge with the longest 

period of time since last service as a regular member of the Standing Panel."

Judge Schoelen is currently the longest serving member, and Judge Allen is the regular 

active judge with highest precedence among judges who have not yet been designated as a member 

of the Standing Panel. Accordingly, the current Standing Panel, comprised of Judges Schoelen, 

Pietsch, and Bartley, will be reconstituted effective August 1, 2018, to comprise Judges Pietsch, 

Bartley, and Allen.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective August 1, 2018, the Standing Panel consists of Judges Pietsch, 

Bartley, and Allen.

DATED: August 14, 2018 FOR THE COURT:

Gregory O. Block

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                   LIST OF IMCO RECYCLING INC. SUBSIDIARIES


Wholly owned unless otherwise indicated as of March 1, 2001.


1.   IMCO Investment Company,  a Delaware Corporation

2.   Interamerican Zinc, Inc.,  a Delaware Corporation

3.   IMCO Recycling of Ohio Inc.,  a Delaware Corporation

4.   IMCO Management Partnership L.P.,  a Texas Limited Partnership

5.   IMCO Recycling of California, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

6.   IMCO Energy Corp., a Delaware Corporation

7.   IMCO International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

8.   IMCO Recycling of Indiana Inc., a Delaware Corporation

9.   IMCO Recycling of Illinois Inc., an Illinois Corporation

10.  IMCO Indiana Partnership L.P., an Indiana Limited Partnership

11.  Pittsburg Aluminum, Inc., a Kansas Corporation

12.  VAW-IMCO GuB und Recycling GmbH, a private company with limited liability
     organized under the laws of Germany (50% owned)

13.  IMCO Recycling of Michigan L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company

14.  IMCO Recycling (UK) Ltd., a private company limited by shares and organized
     under the laws of England and Wales

15.  IMSAMET, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

16.  IMCO Recycling of Idaho Inc., a Delaware Corporation

17.  IMCO Recycling of Utah Inc., a Delaware Corporation
<PAGE>

                   LIST OF IMCO RECYCLING INC. SUBSIDIARIES


18.  Imsamet of Arizona, an Arizona General Partnership (70% owned)

19.  Solar Aluminum Technology  Services, a Utah General Partnership (50% owned)

20.  Rock Creek Aluminum, Inc., an Ohio Corporation

21.  Alchem Aluminum, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

22.  IMCO Recycling Holding B.V., a private company with limited liability
     organized under the laws of the Netherlands

23.  IMCO (UK) Limited Partnership, a limited partnership organized under the
     laws of England and Wales

24.  U.S. Zinc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

25.  Gulf Reduction Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

26.  Midwest Zinc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

27.  MetalChem, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation

28.  Western Zinc Corporation, a California Corporation

29.  U.S. Zinc Export Corporation, a Texas Corporation

30.  U.S. Zinc - FSC, Inc., a Barbados Corporation

31.  MetalChem Canada Incorporated, an Ontario Corporation

32.  MetalChem Handel GmbH, a private company with limited liability organized
     under the laws of Germany

33.  Alchem Aluminum Shelbyville Inc., a Delaware Corporation

34.  Indiana Aluminum Inc., an Indiana Corporation

35.  IMCO Funding Corporation, a Delaware Corporation organized as a  Qualified
     Special Purpose Entity

36.  IMCO Recycling Services Company, a Delaware Corporation

37.  IMCO Operations Services Company, a Delaware Corporation

38.  IMCO Reciclaje de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a limited liability company
     with variable capital organized under the laws of Mexico
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00086-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 4

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-2022-02247-A 

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

DAMARIS PLAISANT MCCALLEY, Appellant

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Damaris Plaisant McCalley attempts to appeal from the order denying her 

motion to recuse the trial-court judge signed by the Presiding Judge of the Eighth 

Administrative Judicial Region. See generally Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a, 18b.

1 We wrote to 

McCalley to notify her of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over her appeal 

because in criminal cases, our jurisdiction is generally limited to cases in which the 

trial court has signed a conviction judgment. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 

161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (per curiam). We further explained that

an interlocutory order denying a recusal motion is not immediately appealable. See, e.g.,

Reger v. State, No. 02-21-00049-CR, 2021 WL 2586619, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

June 24, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We warned 

McCalley that unless she or any party filed a response within ten days showing 

grounds for continuing the appeal, we could dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3.

Ten days have passed, and we have not received a response. Because an order 

denying a recusal motion is not an appealable interlocutory order and the trial court 

has not yet signed a conviction judgment, we dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(j)(1)(A) (“An order 

1

“The procedures for recusal of judges set out in Rule 18a of the Texas Rules 

of Civil Procedure apply in criminal cases.” De Leon v. Aguilar, 127 S.W.3d 1, 5 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 
3 

denying a motion to recuse may be reviewed only for abuse of discretion on appeal 

from the final judgment.”); see also Reger, 2021 WL 2586619, at *1; cf. Green v. State, 

374 S.W.3d 434, 445–46 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (dismissing appeal from order 

denying motion to recuse trial-court judge who had determined defendant’s 

competency to be executed and holding that order could be reviewed only on appeal 

from final judgment determining competency).

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr

Elizabeth Kerr 

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: June 15, 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6400 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6400

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 111 North 6th Street in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Earl Wilson, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2010

   Mr. Clay (for himself, Mr. Carnahan, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
      Skelton, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. Akin, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. 
   Luetkemeyer, Mrs. Maloney, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Bishop of 
 Georgia, Ms. Richardson, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. 
   Meeks of New York, Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan, Ms. Jackson Lee of 
 Texas, and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 111 North 6th Street in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Earl Wilson, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EARL WILSON, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 111 North 6th Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Earl Wilson, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Earl 
Wilson, Jr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.8

             SCHEDULE OF WARRANTS ISSUED (Private Placement - Agent's Warrants)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DATE OF          NAME OF WARRANT RECIPIENT          WARRANT         NUMBER OF           EXERCISE PRICE
ISSUANCE                                            NO.             SHARES OF           EXPIRES
                                                                    COMMON STOCK
----------------- -------------------------------- --------------- ----------------- ------------------------
<S>               <C>                              <C>             <C>               <C>
6/12/2000         J.P. Carey Securities, Inc.      JPC-6           150,000           Exercise Price:  $1.00
                                                                                     Expires 6/12/2005
6/12/2000         Fiji Capital                     JPC-7           110,000           Exercise Price:  $1.00
                                                                                     Expires 6/12/2005
6/12/2000         Metropolitan Capital Partners,   JPC-8           210,000           Exercise Price:  $1.00
                  Inc.                                                               Expires 6/12/2005
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6068 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6068

   To amend title 44, United States Code, to require each agency to 
    include contact information for the agency in its collection of 
                              information.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

 Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California (for herself and Mr. Hall of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 44, United States Code, to require each agency to 
    include contact information for the agency in its collection of 
                              information.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Paperwork Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION REQUIREMENT.

    Section 3506(c)(1)(B)(iii) of title 44, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subclause (IV) by striking ``and'' at the end; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                                    ``(VI) contact information for the 
                                agency, including a website and a 
                                telephone number, by which a person may 
                                obtain a specific contact person 
                                responsible for answering questions 
                                about the information collection and 
                                other information to assist in 
                                responding to the information 
                                collection; and''.

SEC. 3. REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET.

    The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall include 
in the report required by section 3514(a)(1)(B) of title 44, United 
States Code, covering fiscal year 2012 the following:
            (1) The status of implementation by agencies of the 
        requirement in section 3506(c)(1)(B)(iii)(VI) of such title 44, 
        as added by section 2 of this Act.
            (2) A description of how each agency has responded to 
        complaints made to the agency related to the agency's 
        compliance with such requirement.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall apply to new or revised 
collections of information approved by the Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget beginning 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *600Barry Kemp, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyerson, J.), rendered September 16, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

After the jury had reached a verdict finding the defendant guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, but before it was discharged, the foreperson indicated that the jury had not understood a portion of the court’s charge. Specifically, the foreperson indicated that the jury did not understand the distinction between criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, one of the other crimes that had been submitted to the jury. At a sidebar, the court indicated its intention to question the foreperson concerning the jury’s apparent confusion and the defense counsel requested that this be done "[i]n private.” The foreperson was then questioned outside of the courtroom and outside of the presence of the other jurors, but in the presence of the prosecutor and the defense counsel. Another juror was also questioned in this manner. No additional instructions were given during these interviews, which were made on the record and limited to the court’s ascertainment of the source of the confusion.

The following day, the court recharged the jury as to the two crimes at issue. The jury again returned a verdict of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

The defendant alleges that it was reversible error for the court to inquire of the two jurors outside the presence of the other jurors. This argument is without merit. The defendant’s counsel not only did not object to the procedure here at issue, he actually requested it. Hence, any alleged error in this regard was not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the action taken by the court was proper *(see, People v Mullen,*44 NY2d 1). The communication was merely intended to ascertain the source of the jury’s confusion and, as noted, did not involve a fundamental right or material part of the trial. Nor can it be said that the defendant was in any way prejudiced by the communication *(see, People v Moran,*123 AD2d 646).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 3, 2022 No. 04-21-00568-CV EDIFIKA INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a Military Village Apartments, Appellant
v. CHAIN & CHAIN CONSTRUCTION, LLC ,

Appellee From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-CI-14175 Honorable Nicole Garza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On May 19, 2022, we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court showing whether he requested the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record. Appellant has responded, stating he has requested the record from Ms. Tracy Plummer. Appellant also provided proof he paid for the record. We therefore order Ms. Plummer to file the reporter’s record by June 21, 2022.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of June, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### BACON et al., Respondents, v. WHITNEY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Theodore Bacon and others against Belle N. Whitney and others.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of BRADLEY, J., .at special term.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6106 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6106

 To direct the Secretary of Education to establish a clearinghouse of 
  information on best practices for ocean lifeguard training programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 10, 2010

Mr. Weiner (for himself and Mr. Bilbray) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Education to establish a clearinghouse of 
  information on best practices for ocean lifeguard training programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLEARINGHOUSE OF INFORMATION FOR LIFEGUARD TRAINING 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) Establishment of Clearinghouse.--Not later than 1 year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall 
establish a clearinghouse of information that disseminates to States 
and units of general local governments information on how to carry out 
ocean lifeguard training programs that use best practices with respect 
to program materials and tests, particularly with respect to materials 
and tests involving rip current awareness and safety.
    (b) Definitions.--In this Act:
            (1) Ocean lifeguard training program.--The term ``ocean 
        lifeguard training program'' means an ocean lifeguard training 
        program that meets or exceeds the standards set forth in the 
        most recent lifeguarding instructor's manual published by the 
        American Red Cross.
            (2) Rip current.--The term ``rip current'' has the meaning 
        given the term by the Administrator of the National Oceanic and 
        Atmospheric Administration.
            (3) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the 50 States, 
        the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
            (4) Unit of general local government.--The term ``unit of 
        general local government'' means any city, county, town, 
        township, parish, village, or other general purpose political 
        subdivision of a State.
    (c) Funding.--Any new spending authority or new authority to enter 
into contracts provided by this Act and under which the United States 
is obligated to make outlays shall be effective only to the extent, and 
in such amounts, as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w15






EXHIBIT 10.15




SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT



Our directors received directors’ fees for their service in 2009 through March 31, 2009.
Effective April 1, 2009, directors’ fees were suspended for all directors of the Company and the
Bank.











30
l)ISMISS; Opinion hied ,Januarv 2s, 2013

In The 

## QEoiirt of 

## (ppei1 jfiftlj Dttrfct of exa it 

### it[a ____

No. 05-12-01615-CR RANI)ALL ALLEN BOND, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal I)istrictCourtNo. 6 l)allas County, Texas Trial CourtCause No. F09-22112-X



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before ChiefJustice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans Appellant has filed amotion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the be appeal DISMISSED and this decisionbe certifiedbelow forobservance. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.2(a).
PER CURIAM Do Not Publish TEx. R. App.

• 47 121615F.U05