alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE 

OF MARYLAND

 * COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

 

* Misc. Docket AG No. 49

MARGOT ELIZABETH ROBERTS

* September Term, 2021

 

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of 

Maryland and the Respondent, Margot Elizabeth Roberts, to transfer the Respondent to

disability inactive status by consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736(c), it is this 8th day 

of December, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it 

is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Margot Elizabeth Roberts, is hereby transferred 

to disability inactive status by consent, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Margot Elizabeth 

Roberts from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client 

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State 

in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761. 

 /s/ Robert N. McDonald

 Senior Judge
EXHIBIT 31.2 

 

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT 

 

I, J. Lyle Patrick, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MetroPCS, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 27, 2004 

 

/s/ J. Lyle Patrick 

J. Lyle Patrick 

Chief Financial Officer
#### VROOMAN, Appellant, v. HOUSTAN, W. ST. & P. FERRY R. CO., Respondent.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 17, 1894.)

Action by Lyman C. Vrooman against the Houstan, West Street & Pavonia ■Ferry Railroad Company.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

Lamb, Osborne & Petty, for appellant.

Coudert Bros., for respondent.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied, with $10 costs. See 27 N. Y. Supp. 1128.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [OPP-30509A; FRL-6778-3]

# AGENCY:

 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                         In the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 19, 2001 (66 FR 15435) (FRL-6771-5), EPA announced receipt of an application from Monsanto Company to register a pesticide product containing a new active ingredient not included in any previously registered products pursuant to the provisions of section 3(c)(4) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.  On page 15436, second column, first full paragraph, last sentence, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico was inadvertently omitted from the proposed planting locations. The sentence is corrected to read “Plantings are proposed for the states of California, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Nebraska, South Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.” This notice announces the correct proposed planting sites.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 By mail: Mike Mendelsohn, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (703) 308-8715; e-mail: mendelsohn.mike@epa.gov.

# List of Subjects 

        - Environmental protection
        - Pesticides and pests

Dated:  April  5, 2001.

Janet L. Andersen, 

Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 01-10437 Filed 4-25-01 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
Exhibit 21.1
 OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, Inc.
 SUBSIDIARY
    
    STATE/COUNTRYCapstar Drilling, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareCrown Camp Services Ltd.
    
    Alberta, CanadaGeneral Marine Leasing, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareOil States Energy Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareOil States Industries, Inc.
    
    DelawareOil States Industries (Asia) Pte Ltd
    
    SingaporeOil States Industries (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomOil States Skagit SMATCO L.L.C.
    
    DelawarePTI Group, Inc.
    
    Alberta, CanadaPTI Premium Camp Services Ltd.
    
    Alberta, CanadaSooner, Inc.
    
    DelawareSooner Pipe, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareStinger Wellhead Protection, Incorporated
    
    TexasStinger Wellhead Protection (Canada) Incorporated
    
    Alberta, CanadaA-Z Terminal Corporation
    
    OklahomaSpecialty Rental Tools & Supply, L.L.C.
    
    DelawarePTI Travco Modular Structures Ltd.
    
    Alberta, CanadaPTI Noble Structures, Inc.
    
    Alberta, CanadaSchooner Petroleum Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareWell Testing, Inc.
    
    Delaware
(85 South. 480)

#### CORONA COAL CO. v. WRIGHT.

(6 Div. 38.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 22, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; J. J. Curtis, Judge.

Action by Annis Wright against the Corona Coal Company for damage to land by overflow, etc. Prom judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

A. P. Pite, of Jasper, for appellant.

Ray & Cooner, of Jasper, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed, upon the authority of Corona Coal Co. v. Hooker, ante, p. 221, 85 South. 477, this day decided.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAXRE, GARDNER, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

The Second Supplemental ROD for Lowry AFB changes four decisions made in the original Lowry AFB ROD signed on August 1, 1994. Three of the changes involve conveying Parcels F, FF, and S to the Lowry Redevelopment Authority to be included in their Economic Development Conveyance. The fourth change is to assign Parcel MM to the Department of Health and Human Services for their conveyance of the property to Third Way Center. 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-10303 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
Exhibit 15.1



                  LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION




November 12, 2002





Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc.
1000 Kiewit Plaza
Omaha, Nebraska 68131

Re:  Registration Statement No. 333-90418

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 12, 2002
related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such
report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or
certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.





                                         /s/ KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Eddie Hall, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), imposed September 10, 1985, upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, the sentence being concurrent indeterminate terms of from *2 Vs*to 7 years’ imprisonment.

Ordered that the sentence is reversed, on the law, the defendant is adjudged to be a second violent felony offender, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for resentencing.

The court declined to sentence the defendant as a second violent felony offender on the ground that his earlier guilty plea to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was constitutionally defective. The court concluded that the plea allocution on the prior conviction failed to set forth facts sufficient to establish all of the elements of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, specifically whether the weapon was loaded and operable. Criminal Term was in error.

This earlier plea was a bargained plea to a lesser crime and may be sustained even without an inquiry as to its factual basis *(People v Clairborne,*29 NY2d 950, 951). Furthermore, a challenge to a plea based on an insufficient factual allocution is not a challenge based on constitutional grounds within the purview of CPL 400.15 (7) (b) or 400.21 (7) (b) *(People v*
      *126
      *Perkins,*89 AD2d 956; *People v Savino,*115 AD2d 571, *lv denied*67 NY2d 889). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 07-10

IN RE: COMMITTEE ON ADMISSIONS AND PRACTICE

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN,

LANCE, DAVIS and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED that David B. Isbell, Esq., is reappointed to the Committee on Admission

and Practice for a term expiring on November 19, 2013, under Rules 2(a)(2) and (3) of the Court's

Rules of Admission and Practice. 

DATED: July 16, 2010 BY THE COURT:

/s/ William P. Greene, Jr.

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
#### PEOPLE ex rel. ROOSEVELT v. BARKER et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Proceeding by the People on the relation of John E. Roosevelt against Edward Barker and others. .

Argued before O’BRIEN, FOLLETT, and PARKER, JJ.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.'
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 24, 2022

NO. 03

- 20

- 00552

- CR

The State of Texas , Appellant

v.

Samantha Leann Lamb , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HAYS COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, T RIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on Octob er 9, 2020

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. The appellant shall pay

all costs relating to this ap peal, both in this Court and in the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               3
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                       0
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Broadwind Energy, Inc. (the "Company") for the year
ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter C. Duprey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 16,
2011

/s/ PETER C. DUPREY Peter C. Duprey President and Chief Executive Officer


This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31(b)

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steve Obana,  chief financial officer of Technology  Acquisition  Corporation
("Registrant") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB ("Report") of Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  Registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions  about the  effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  Registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to the  Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  Registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: June 29, 2004
                                        /s/ Steve Obana
                                        ---------------
                                        Steve Obana, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                             CALAIS RESOURCES, INC.

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                          Principal Financial Officer

      To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
August 31, 2004, containing financial statements for the period then ended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of
1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Calais
Resources, Inc. for the periods presented.

October 14, 2004

/s/ Matthew C. Witt
------------------------------
Matthew C. Witt, Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2510

JACKIE BURRELL, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL, LLC, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District 

Judge. (1:12-cv-01326-WMN) 

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jackie Burrell, Appellant Pro Se. Eric S. Mueller, SEMMES, 

BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland; Eileen Carr Riley, Larry 

Robert Seegull, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Jackie Burrell seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order granting Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and 

dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim upon 

which relief may be granted. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on October 4, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed on 

December 10, 2012. Because Burrell failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the 

appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED