alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Tomas Rivas OROZCO; Esther Rivas, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-74358.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2011.*

Filed April 26, 2011.

Tomas Rivas Orozco, Hacienda Heights, CA, pro se.

Joseph D. Hardy, Jr., Esquire, Trial, John Beadle Holt, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Blah* O’Connor, Assistant Director, Luis E. Perez, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tomas Rivas Orozco and Esther Rivas, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to reopen. With respect to cancellation of removal, the BIA considered the evidence petitioners submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. *See Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law.”). With respect to relief under the Conven*788tion Against Torture (“CAT”), petitioners failed to establish prima facie eligibility for CAT protection. *See Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder,*600 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir.2010).

To the extent it is raised, we lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ hardship contention relating to the BIA’s February 26, 2008, order because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. *See Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Projects Nos. 2060-005, 2084-020, 2320-005, and 2330-007; and 2869-007 New York] 

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office of Energy Projects staff has reviewed the applications for new license for the Carry Falls, Upper Raquette River, Middle Raquette River, and the Lower Raquette River Hydroelectric Projects, and the application for amendment of exemption for the Potsdam Water Power Project, located on the Raquette River in St. Lawrence County, New York, and has prepared a final multiple project Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the projects. In the FEA, the Commission's staff has analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the existing projects and has concluded that approval of the projects, with appropriate environmental protection measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 

                    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Public Reference Branch, Room 2-A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The FEA may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (please call (202) 208-2222 for assistance).                 

David P. Boergers, 

Secretary. 

FR Doc. 01-10037 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 13.1





SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION





(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 of Hydrogenics Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Daryl Wilson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/ Daryl WilsonName:

Daryl WilsonTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer





Date: August 27, 2012








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will be retained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w1









Exhibit 10.1




Loan Terms Agreement

(Amended)



Loan Amount: $150,000



Agreed Interest Payment: $50,000 &

100,000 warrants to purchase iMedia common stock at a conversion price set at trading price at the end of day of funding or 50 cents whichever is less.



Maximum Loan Term: 60 days (Funding Date – 2/1/2010)


iMedia International Inc, has entered into this agreement for bridge financing to enable fiduciary
responsibilities and payroll commitments until a larger funding of 2.5 million dollars US is
completed.


This loan is guaranteed paid in full within 60 days of the date of funding, using collateral of
common stock and or assets of the company, and a total debt service payment not to exceed $200,000
in cash value. In addition lender earns warrants to purchase common stock in iMedia International
at the agreed conversion price. There will be a five (5) day grace period at the conclusion of the
term to service the entire debt obligation.


This loan is secured and collateralized by common stock of iMedia International Inc. This loan is
guaranteed unconditionally from the company’s Chairman and CEO, and both lender and borrower agree
to hold the other party harmless to any additional damages beyond the cash value of the loan plus
the agreed interest amount.


By signing below both parties hereby agree to the terms represented on this document and will
perform using best efforts to reach dates and deadlines of said agreement.



	 	 	 	 	 	 

	By Lender:
 

	 	iMedia International Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Print Name:

	 	 	 	Henry Williamson — Chairman and CEO
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:           /          /          

	 	Date:           /          /
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Joseph J. Raymond, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31,2003 of Stratus Services Group, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a.     designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b.     evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”);and

 

c.     presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a.     all significant deficienciesin the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and

 

b.     any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls.

 

6.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date:       October 14, 2003

 
|   | /s/  Joseph J. Raymond                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph  J. Raymond                    |
|   | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
- Home
- Media Center
- Press Releases

# USCP Searching for Criminals Who Carjacked Congressman

Press Release

The United States Capitol Police (USCP) is working to find the three criminals who carjacked a Member of Congress.

"We have a number of leads," said U.S. Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger. "Our investigators are focused, determined and working around the clock."

The USCP is being assisted by the DC Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and the FBI Washington Field Office.

At approximately 9:30 p.m., on Tuesday, October 2, a USCP Agent who was working in the area of New Jersey Avenue and K Street, SE, radioed USCP Communications to notify them that a witness reported a carjacking to them. 

The victim, who has been identified as a Member of Congress, told investigators that he was carjacked by three men who were wearing masks and dressed in black clothing. According to the victim's statements, the suspects "*swarmed [the victim's] vehicle, pointed firearms in his face and demanded the keys to the car*." Thankfully there were not any injuries.

A witness told investigators three males in knit caps and ski masks were involved. The witness reported that the suspects were 5'10" black males who may have been around the age of 16 due to their build.

USCP officers who routinely patrol the area around the Capitol Complex rushed to the scene and canvassed the neighborhood. They recovered the victim's stolen phone along the 2000 block of 14 Street, SE.

The stolen white Toyota crossover was recovered, with the assistance of MPD, along the 2600 block of Douglas Road, SE. It had been abandoned. USCP Crime Scene Technicians processed the scene.

The USCP will keep the public updated on the status of the investigation.

## Media Center

              - Press Releases
              - USCP Arrests
              - USCP FAST FACTS

## Yearly Archive

                  - 2024               (4)          
                  - 2023               (26)          
                  - 2022               (36)          
                  - 2021               (73)          
                  - 2020               (9)          
                  - 2019               (15)          
                  - 2018               (14)          
                  - 2017               (28)          
                  - 2016               (18)          
                  - 2015               (10)          
                  - 2014               (14)          
                  - 2013               (10)          
                  - 2012               (10)          
                  - 2011               (13)          
                  - 2010               (10)          
                  - 2009               (18)          
                  - 2008               (11)          
                  - 2007               (14)          
                  - 2006               (23)          
                  - 2005               (18)          
                  - 2004               (24)          
                  - 2003               (15)
**Exhibit 10.2**

**Summary of May 10, 2006 oral agreement with Joseph F. Pinkerton, III, its Chairman of the**

**Board and its former President and Chief Executive Officer**

On May 10, 2006, Active Power entered into an oral agreement with JosephF. Pinkerton, IIII in connection with his departure as Chief Executive Officer of the company and his continuation as its Chairman of the Board. Pursuant to the terms of such agreement, Mr. Pinkerton will receive an annual base salary of$90,000 and his annual bonus target under Active Power’s Executive Compensation Plan will be 100% of his annual base salary. Mr. Pinkerton will continue to participate in Active Power’s employee benefit programs.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                                                    ------------
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Walter Tatum, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CYBERADS, INC.
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
    business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and
    procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
    the small business issuer and have:
    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
        to ensure that material information relating to the small business
        issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
        others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
        this report is being prepared;
    (b) Not required.
    (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
        controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
        about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
        and
    (d) Not required.

Date: May 19, 2006

/s/ WALTER TATUM
Walter Tatum
Secretary, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Sample Certificate of Service

Form 1340, 12/23

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

______________ DISTRICT OF ________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

In Re: Case No.

Chapter 

Debtor(s).

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds and the required

supporting documentation were sent by: ____________________________________________

 (Specify Method of Delivery, e.g., USPS First-Class Mail postage prepaid)

to the following: 

Office of the United States Attorney

_________ District of ___________

[Enter current address]

I certify that a copy of the Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds was sent by:

__________________________________________________________________________

(Specify Method of Delivery, e.g., USPS First-Class Mail postage prepaid)

to Previous Owner(s) of Claim (if applicable):

[Enter name and current address for each previous owner served, or provide statement with your 

application addressing why service is not possible.] 

Dated:______________________ ________________________________

Signature

Print Name: ________________________

Address: ___________________________

 _____________________________

Phone: ____________________________

Email: _____________________________
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

m 01-40013

_______________

JENNIFER CAREY,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF

THE ESTATE OF GARY ANTHONY CARY, DECEASED,

AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF DANIEL ANTHONY CAREY

AND LEE RICHARD CAREY AND GARY MARTIN JOHN CAREY;

ANNE CAREY; ROLAND LEE BRUMLEY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

SUB SEA INTERNATIONAL, INC.; SUB SEA OFFSHORE, LTD.;

MOBIL CORPORATION; MOBIL NORTH SEA, LTD.;

COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION; COOPER CAMERON (U.K.), LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

_________________________

February 11, 2002
2

Before SMITH and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges,

and DUPLANTIER, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs appeal an injunction preventing them from taking certain actions in

state court. We have reviewed the briefs and

pertinent portions ofthe record and have heard

the arguments of counsel. We conclude that

the district court plainly had jurisdiction. That

court did not abuse its discretion and

committed no reversible error in entering the

injunction pursuant to the relitigation

exception to the Anti-Injunction Act.

The order granting the injunction is

AFFIRMED. We decline to award fees or

costs for vexatious litigation or frivolous

appeal.

* District Judge of the Eastern District of

Louisiana, sitting by designation.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40129

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ORALIA MICHELLE CUELLAR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-735-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oralia Michelle

Cuellar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cuellar has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-40129 Document: 00512473828 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40129

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40129 Document: 00512473828 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 18-2075

JESSIE B. LEWIS, PETITIONER,

V.

ROBERT L. WILKIE,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, RESPONDENT.

Before BARTLEY, GREENBERG, and ALLEN, Judges.

O R D E R

On April 26, 2018, the Court construed the opening brief in Lewis v. Wilkie, U.S. Vet. App. 

No. 17-0083, as a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking the adjudication of a potentially pending 

claim for service connection for sinusitis. This docket number (18-2075) was opened to address 

the construed petition, and oral argument was held. 

The Court will address the substantive issue raised by the petition in Lewis v. Wilkie, No. 

17-0083, and dismiss the petition as moot. It is

ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED as moot.

DATED: March 19, 2019 PER CURIAM.

Copies to: 

Penelope E. Gronbeck, Esq.

VA General Counsel (027)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Logility,
Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          31,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                       421
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,576
<PP&E>                                           1,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                     561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,228
<SALES>                                          9,707    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,749
<CGS>                                            2,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,733     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>