alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Patrick
D. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

     1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 19, 2003

/s/ Patrick D. O'Brien
-----------------------
Patrick O'Brien
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Andrew
P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

     1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 19, 2003

/s/ Andrew P. Calerich
-----------------------
Andrew P. Calerich
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6270 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6270

    To amend chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, to require 
commemorative works in the District of Columbia and its environs to be 
 constructed of materials that are grown, produced, or manufactured in 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

   Mr. Kildee (for himself, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. 
   Lipinski, and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, to require 
commemorative works in the District of Columbia and its environs to be 
 constructed of materials that are grown, produced, or manufactured in 
                           the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Monuments Assembled and Domestically 
Engineered Act'' or the ``MADE Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR USE OF AMERICAN MATERIALS IN CONSTRUCTION OF 
              CERTAIN COMMEMORATIVE WORKS.

    (a) Requirement.--
            (1) Decision criteria.--Section 8905(b) of title 40, United 
        States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(8) American materials.--A commemorative work shall be 
        constructed using material--
                    ``(A) that, in the case of unmanufactured material, 
                is mined or produced in the United States; and
                    ``(B) that, in the case of manufactured material, 
                is manufactured in the United States substantially all 
                from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, 
                or manufactured, as the case may be, in the United 
                States.''.
            (2) Criteria for issuance of construction permit.--Section 
        8906(3) of such title is amended by inserting before the 
        semicolon the following: ``, and such contract documents 
        demonstrate that the material to be used in the construction of 
        the commemorative work complies with the criteria described in 
        section 8905(b)(8) of this title, as determined in accordance 
        with regulations implementing the Buy American Act (10 U.S.C. 
        10a et seq.)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to commemorative works for which construction permits are issued 
under section 8906 of title 40, United States Code, on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6114

D E ANDRE JAMES , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. PAUL ADAMS , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. ( 5:20

- cv - 00248

- JPB )

Submitted : April 1, 2022 Decided: April 18, 2022

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.

DeAndre James , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
De A ndre James seeks to appeal the district court’ s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. 1 When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case , parties are accorded 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B),
unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). However, if a party moves for an extension of time to ap peal within 30 days after expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause, a district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A); Washington v. Bumgarner , 882 F.2d 899,
900

- 01 (4th Cir. 1989). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 8, 2021. James filed his notice of appeal on January 24, 2022, after the expiration of the 60

- day appeal period but within the 30

- day excusable neglect period. 2 Bec ause James’ notice of appeal contained language requesting an extension of time to file his appeal, we construe it as a
motion for an extension of time under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). Accordingly, we remand

1 Although the district court dismissed the petition without prejudice, the dismissal order is final and appealable because mere amendment cannot cure the deficiencies identified by the district court. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 610 (4th Cir

. 2020), cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).

2 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date James could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App . P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).3 this case to the district court for the limited p urpose of determining whether James demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the 6 0

- day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, may then be returned to this court for further
consideration.
REMANDED
#### CURRAN, Respondent, v. GALEN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

March 27, 1894.)

Action by Charles Curran against Lewis Galen, as president, etc., and others.

Argued before DWIGHT, P. J., and LEWIS, HAIGHT, and BRADLEY, JJ.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs, with leave to amend answer within 20 days, upon payment of the costs of this appeal and of the demurrer, on the opinion of Adams, J., at the special term. 22 N. Y. Supp. 826.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 2907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1033]



[[Page 2907]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-3156-EM]


New Jersey; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency for the State of 
New Jersey (FEMA-3156-EM), dated November 1, 2000, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 27, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is amended to May 30, 2000 through November 
1, 2000. Further, FEMA intends to provide emergency protective measures 
(Category B), at 75 percent Federal funding for eligible costs incurred 
by the State government.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 01-1033 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         The undersigned, a director of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., hereby
constitutes and appoints Stephen J. Tomassi and Gregory D. Waller, or either of
them, his true and lawful attorneys and agents, each with full power and
authority to act as such without the other, to do any and all acts and things
and to execute any and all instruments which either one of said attorneys and
agents may deem necessary or advisable to enable said Corporation to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), as amended; and including
specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, full power and authority
to each of said attorneys and agents to sign the name of the undersigned to the
Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001, and any
amendment(s) thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to the requirements of the Act, the undersigned hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and delivered these
presents as of the 7th day of December 2001.





                                                          /s/ Dennis B. Brown
                                                        ------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 623 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 623

 To provide for greater judicial discretion in sentencing for certain 
       firearms offenses committed in exceptional circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2009

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for greater judicial discretion in sentencing for certain 
       firearms offenses committed in exceptional circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GREATER JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN SENTENCING FOR CERTAIN 
              FIREARMS OFFENSES COMMITTED IN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES.

    Section 924(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as subparagraphs (D) and (E), 
respectively, and inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
    ``(C) The minimum sentencing requirements of subparagraphs (A) and 
(B) shall not apply if--
            ``(i) the person who used, carried, or possessed the 
        firearm was authorized to carry that type of firearm in the 
        lawful performance of an employment duty;
            ``(ii) the offense under this paragraph occurred during or 
        in relation to such employment; and
            ``(iii) the crime during and in relation to which the 
        offense under this paragraph occurred is a crime of 
        violence.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6278
JOSEPH PAUL VERNO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAYNE HILLIARD, Unit Manager; AARON EDISON, Counselor; WILLIAM THOMPSON, Warden of Federal Correctional Institution, Morgantown; MARY E. MCBRIDE, Acting Administrator National Inmate Appeals of Bureau of Prisons, Justice Department, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-69-1) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 21, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Paul Verno, Appellant Pro Se. William David Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 3 PER CURIAM: Verno appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint and denying his request to have a charge expungedfrom his prison record. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Verno v. Hilliard , No. CA-95-69-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 12

- 00354

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 0522806

Style: CMA

- CGM (America), INC

v Empire Truck Lines, INC

Date motion filed * : November 12, 2012

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Brief

Party filing motion: Appellee

Document to be filed: Yes

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: n/a (on file)

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

Date: M arch 20, 201 3
#### AUSTEN, Receiver of Taxes, Respondent, v. GEORGE V. HECKER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by David E. Austen, receiver of taxes, against the George V. Hecker Company. F. R. Coudert, Jr., for appellant. J. G. N. Myers, for respondent.

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### STUBING v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

June 18, 1894.)

Action by Frederick J. Stubing against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted. See 28 N. Y. Supp. 960.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis Brown, Appellant.

Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered on June 10, 1985, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 **CLICKABLE
        ENTERPRISES, INC.**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Guy
      Pipolo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.






*Date:* September
      24, 2007


*/s/
        Guy
        Pipolo*
 *Guy
        Pipolo*
 *Chief
        Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)*


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6282 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6282

                      To repeal Public Law 107-40.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

    Ms. Lee of California (for herself, Mr. Jones, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. 
  Kucinich, Mr. Paul, Mr. Honda, Ms. Pingree of Maine, Mr. Stark, Mr. 
  Ellison, and Mr. Grijalva) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      To repeal Public Law 107-40.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Repeal of the Authorization for Use 
of Military Force''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDING.

    Congress finds that the Authorization for Use of Military Force 
(Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), signed into law on September 
18, 2001, has been used to justify a broad and open-ended authorization 
for the use of military force and such an interpretation is 
inconsistent with the authority of Congress to declare war and make all 
laws for executing powers vested by the Constitution in the Government 
of the United States.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF PUBLIC LAW 107-40.

    Effective 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 
1541 note) is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
capl-ex104_11.htm



Exhibit 10.4 EXECUTION VERSION

 

TERMINATION AGREEMENT 

(VOTING AGREEMENT)

 

This TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of November 19, 2019, is made and entered into by and among CST Brands, LLC, (formerly known as CST Brands, Inc.) a Delaware corporation (“CST”), Joseph V. Topper, Jr., an individual, (“Topper”), 2004 Irrevocable Agreement of Trust of Joseph V. Topper, Sr. (the “Topper Trust”) and Dunne Manning Inc. (formerly known as Lehigh Gas Corporation), a Delaware corporation (together with the Topper Trust and Topper, the “Equityholders”). 

 

WHEREAS, CST and each of the Equityholders are parties to that certain Voting Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2014 (the “Voting Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2019, by and among CST, CST GP, LLC, CST Brands Holdings, LLC, the Subsidiaries of CST set forth on the signatures pages thereto, Lehigh Gas GP Holdings LLC, Dunne Manning CAP Holdings I LLC and Dunne Manning CAP Holdings II LLC (the “Purchase Agreement”), CST and each Equityholder wish to terminate the Voting Agreement and all rights, liabilities and obligations of CST and each Equityholder thereunder.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree, confirm and acknowledge as follows:

 

1.Termination. Effective as of the Closing (as such term is defined in the Purchase Agreement), the Voting Agreement is hereby terminated and, from and after the Closing, none of CST nor any of the Equityholders shall have any further rights, liabilities or obligations thereunder; provided, however, that the provisions of Article IV of the Voting Agreement (other than Section 4.2) shall survive such termination and shall remain in full force and effect).

 

2.Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law thereof.

 

3.Binding on Successors.  This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns.  

 

4.Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

 

[Signature page follows]

 

 

 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first set forth above.

 

 

CST BRANDS, LLC

By:/s/ Darrell Davis
Name:Darrell Davis
Title:President

 

dunne manning inc.

By:/s/ Joseph V. Topper, Jr.
Name:Joseph V. Topper, Jr.
Title:Chief Executive Officer

 

JOSEPH V. TOPPER, JR.

           /s/ Joseph V. Topper, Jr.



2004 Irrevocable Agreement of Trust of Joseph V. Topper, Sr.

By:/s/ Joseph V. Topper, Jr. 
Name:Joseph V. Topper, Jr.
Title:Trustee

 

 

[Signature Page to Termination Agreement]