alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6409 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6409

  To prohibit the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration 
from requiring the replacement of street and highway signs that are in 
  upper case letters with such signs that are in mixed case lettering 
with the initial letter in upper case followed by lower case lettering.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2010

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration 
from requiring the replacement of street and highway signs that are in 
  upper case letters with such signs that are in mixed case lettering 
with the initial letter in upper case followed by lower case lettering.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO NEW SIGNS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of 
the Federal Highway Administration may not require the replacement of 
street and highway signs that are in upper case letters with signs that 
are in mixed case lettering with the initial letter in upper case 
followed by lower case lettering.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                             CALAIS RESOURCES, INC.

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           Principal Executive Officer

         To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended February 29, 2004, containing financial statements for the period then
ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Calais Resources, Inc. for the periods presented.

April 13, 2004

/s/ Thomas S. Hendricks
------------------------------------
Thomas S. Hendricks, Chief Executive
Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re Transfer of Attorney to Administrative Suspension Status Pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 219(l) : : : : : : : No. 4 IDE Nos. C3-17-599, C3-18-490, C3-18-130 Attorney Registration No. 49104 (York County)

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 8 th day of August, 2019, the Disciplinary Board having certified his name to the Court for failure to pay expenses taxed under Pa.R.D.E. 208(g)(3), Clarence E. Allen is transferred to administrative suspension status. See Pa.R.D.E. 219(l). He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1


                          PROVINCE HEALTHCARE COMPANY


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Report of Province Healthcare Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Martin S. Rash, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

         (2)      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 9, 2003                               /s/ Martin S. Rash
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Martin S. Rash
                                                Chief Executive Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished to the SEC pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" as part of the
Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to
liability under that section. Such certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Province Healthcare Company and will be
retained by Province Healthcare Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
VISION CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 4, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                 8,297
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                          6,767
<ALLOWANCES>                             351
<INVENTORY>                            9,148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      26,075
<PP&E>                                 9,009
<DEPRECIATION>                         3,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        47,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  6,457
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                  80
<OTHER-SE>                            33,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          47,470
<SALES>                               20,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      20,753
<CGS>                                 11,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         11,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       2,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        2,225
<INCOME-TAX>                             929
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,296
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.16
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23(ii)****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consentto the incorporation by reference of the following two reports intoAmerican Oil & Gas Inc.’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-121941) andRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-128812,No. 333-120987 and No. 333-139648.): **•** Our report dated April 2, 2007, except for the secondparagraph of that report, which is dated April 10, 2007 on the December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity, cash flow and comprehensiveincome for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2006, of American Oil and Gas, Inc. (“American”) and **•** Our report dated April 2, 2007 on American management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over American financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2006 and on the effectiveness of internal controlover American financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,whichreports appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for American for the year ended December 31, 2006.Hein & Associates LLPDenver, Colorado
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 3-99

IN RE:

PANEL REFERRALS IN PRO SE CASES

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY,

HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

It is sua sponte,

ORDERED that when a determination is made, under the Internal Operating Procedures, Part

I(b)(5) or II(c) second paragraph, and Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23, 25-26 (1990), that a

panel should be selected for consideration and disposition of an appeal or other matter in which the

appellant is not represented, a clerk's order, designated for electronic publication only, will be

entered stating that such a determination has been made and that the matter will be stayed for 30

days.

DATED: April 8, 1999 BY THE COURT:

FRANK Q. NEBEKER

Chief Judge

STEINBERG, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the order except

for the explicit limitation to the two situations set forth in the Court's Internal Operating Procedures

(where the screening judge decides to refer a case to a panel either initially after screening or at the

request of two other judges after circulation of a proposed single-judge disposition). Rather, I

believe that any determination that a case involving an unrepresented appellant is to be referred to

a panel (or initially to the en banc Court, for that matter) should precipitate a notice order of the

Court under this new procedure. This could also happen after the screening judge makes an initial

screening determination for single-judge disposition (including after full Court circulation even

though two judges do no request referral to a panel) or on a motion for a panel decision made by

either party under Rule 35(b) of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure (Rules) after issuance

of a single-judge disposition. Initial en banc review for a case involving an unrepresented appellant

could occur based on the suggestion of a judge (if three others agree) or on the motion of a party

under Rule 35(c)(1).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.4





                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         The undersigned, a director of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., hereby
constitutes and appoints Stephen J. Tomassi and Gregory D. Waller, or either of
them, his true and lawful attorneys and agents, each with full power and
authority to act as such without the other, to do any and all acts and things
and to execute any and all instruments which either one of said attorneys and
agents may deem necessary or advisable to enable said Corporation to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), as amended; and including
specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, full power and authority
to each of said attorneys and agents to sign the name of the undersigned to the
Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, and any
amendment(s) thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to the requirements of the Act, the undersigned hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and delivered these
presents as of the 8th day of December 2000.





                                                      /s/ Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr.
                                                      --------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10702]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-930; MM Docket No. 89-120, RM-6701, 6999, 7000, 7001]


FM Broadcasting Services; Northwye, Cuba, Waynesville, Lake 
Ozark, and Eldon, MO

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In MM Docket No. 89-120, the Commission dismissed as moot the 
petition for reconsideration filed by Lake Broadcasting, Inc., licensee 
of Station KBMX(FM), Channel 270A (101.9 MHz), Eldon, Missouri, and 
grantee of the construction permit for Station KFXE (FM), Channel 271A 
(102.1), Cuba, Missouri. Lake had requested reconsideration of the 
Report and Order, 57 FR 6561, published February 26, 1992. The 
Commission dismissed Lake's petition for reconsideration following the 
denial of certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court in Lake's appeal of the 
revocation of its licenses and construction permits. See Contemporary 
Media, Inc., et al., v. Federal Communications Commission, 214 F. 3d 
187 (D.C. Cir 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. ____ (2001). Michael Rice, 
Lake's sole owner and president, had been convicted of the felonies of 
deviate sexual conduct and sodomy of minors. Lake and other licensees 
owned or controlled by Rice also made repeated misrepresentations to 
the Commission as to Rice's continued involvement with their stations. 
With this action, the proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective May 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Bertron Withers, Jr., Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Memorandum Opinion 
and Order, MM Docket 89-120, adopted April 4, 2001, and released April 
13, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's 
Reference Information Center (room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may be also 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, 
(202) 857-3800.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-10702 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Bode Xu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 14, 2011





/s/ Bode XuBode Xu, Principal Financial and Accounting

Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10386]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-651-000]


Southwestern Electric Power Company; Notice of Filing

April 20, 2001.
    Take notice that on March 20, 2001, Southwestern Electric Power 
Company (SWEPCO) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission), an amendment to its formula rate contract 
between SWEPCO and Louisiana Generating, LLC (LaGen) and revised rate 
sheets to the formula rate contract between SWEPCO and the City of 
Bentonville, Arkansas (Bentonville)
    SWEPCO is requesting that the Commission accept the LaGen Contract 
and the Bentonville Rate sheets for filing effective January 1, 2001.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www/ferc/fed/us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwod A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10386 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Consent of Independent Accountants



We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 033-62201) of Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc. of our report
dated July 31, 1998  appearing on page 25 of the Annual  Report to  Shareholders
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statements  Schedules,
which appears on page 25 of this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

    Rochester, New York
    August 24, 1998
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






I, Joseph P. Hubert, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this annual report of Excalibur Industries for the year ended May 31, 2011, on Form 10-K;




2. Based on my knowledge, this annual  report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;




4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;




b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and




c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date July 1, 2011




/s/ JOSEPH P. HUBERT


President, Chief Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer
#### HOLMES v. JONES.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

May 8, 1894.)

Action by Ebenezer Holmes against Gilbert E. Jones, as treasurer of the New York Times.

Argued before MAYHAM, P. J., and HERRICK, J.

No opinion'. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 23 N. Y. Supp. G31.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,136
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             305
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   366
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    108,189
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,985
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,913
<LOANS>                                        183,132
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 311,801
<DEPOSITS>                                     219,255
<SHORT-TERM>                                    51,917
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,277
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,944
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 301,801
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,377
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,382
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    71
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,830
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,361
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,154
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,676
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      551
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (100)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,473
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,473
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,876
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.78
<LOANS-NON>                                        141
<LOANS-PAST>                                         3
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,452
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,805
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       13
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,343
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,343
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>