alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6210 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to facilitate business and agricultural 

leasing of Navajo Nation lands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 

Mr. LUJA ́N (for himself and Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to facilitate business 

and agricultural leasing of Navajo Nation lands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAVAJO NATION LEASING AUTHORITY. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION FOR 99-YEAR LEASES.—Sub5 section (e)(1)(A) of the Act of August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 

6 415(e)(1)(A), is amended in the first sentence by striking 

7 ‘‘25 years’’ and all that follows through the semicolon and 

8 inserting ‘‘99 years;’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6210 IH

1 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a) shall apply to any lease entered into or renewed 

3 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Intent To Issue a Temporary of Concession Contract For 
Food and Beverage, Lodging and Merchandise Services at Oregon Caves 
National Monument

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Park Service Concessions Management 
Improvement Act of 1998, notice is hereby given that the National Park 
Service intends to issue a temporary concession contract authorizing 
continued operation of food and beverage, overnight lodging and 
merchandise services to the public within Oregon Caves National 
Monument. The temporary concession contract will be for a term of not 
more than one year. This short-term concession contract is necessary to 
avoid interruption of visitor services while the National Park Service 
finalizes the development of the Prospectus to be issued for a long-
term concession contract. This short-term contract will be for a one 
seasonal operating period ending November 30, 2001. This notice is in 
pursuant to 36 CFR Part 51, Section 51.24(a).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The concession contract at Oregon Caves 
National Monument expired on December 31, 2001. The operation is 
seasonal and operates primarily from mid-May through mid-September and 
provides visitors with lodging, food and beverage and merchandises 
services. Oregon Caves National Monument is near completion of a 
Prospectus for the solicitation of a long-term concession contract that 
meets the requirements of the park's General Management Plan regarding 
commercial services offered to the public. The short-term concession 
contract will allow for this action to take place without a long-term 
delay in service to the public.
    Information about this place can be sought from: National Park 
Service, Chief, Concession Program Management Office, Pacific West 
Region, Attn: Mr. Tony Sisto, 600 Harrison Street, Suite 600, San 
Francisco, California 94107-1372, or call (415) 427-1366.

    Dated: January 22, 2001.
John J. Reynolds,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 01-10404 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 9, 2009 

1215 

Order 

 

January 9, 2009 

137372 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137372 

 COA: 286566 

Genesee CC: 07-021211-FH 

YOLANDA LAMAR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
exv10w7wb






Exhibit 10.7(b)








June 9,
2009

SandRidge Capital, L.P.

1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 325

Houston, Texas 77056


Attention: Mr. Andrew M. Rowe



     Re: Management Agreement Renewal



Dear Mr. Rowe:




We are writing with respect to your
management agreement concerning the commodity pool to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through
June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement
will remain unchanged.




	 	•



•


•


•


•


•


•


•


•


•


	 	Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.




Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II




SB Bristol Energy Fund LP




CMF SandRidge Master Fund L.P.




Bohdan Mysko




CMF SandRidge Feeder (Cayman) Ltd.




UDC International




Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.




Citigroup Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.




Citigroup Diversified Futures fund L.P.






Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	SANDRIDGE CAPITAL. L.P.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Andrew M. Rowe	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Print Name: Andrew M. Rowe	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	JM/sr
#### Maurine E. AKWI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-1876.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2011.

Decided: May 12, 2011.

Irena I. Karpinski, Law Offices of Irena I. Karpinski, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Susan Bennett Green, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurine E. Akwi, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for relief from removal.

Akwi first challenges the determination that she failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable fact-finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Akwi fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii) (2006).

Having failed to qualify for asylum, Akwi cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *Chen v. INS,*195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir.1999); *INS v. Cardozar-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987). Finally, we uphold the finding below that Akwi failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that she would be tortured if removed to Cameroon. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2010).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10578

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMES KENNETH OWENS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:06-CR-12-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent James Kenneth Owens has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Owens has filed a response. The record is insufficiently

developed to allow consideration at this time of Owens’s claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal

when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10578

2

existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v.

Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and

Owens’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

SUBSIDIARY
    
    JURISDICTIONOrmco Corporation
    
    DelawareAllesee Orthodontic Appliances, Inc.
    
    WisconsinMaquiladora Aci-Mex, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoOrmco B.V
    
    The NetherlandsOrmco (Europe) B.V
    
    The NetherlandsOrmco de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoOrmco (Europe) AG
    
    SwitzerlandOrmco GmbH
    
    GermanyOrmco Pty. Limited
    
    AustraliaOrmex S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoSocodent S.A.
    
    FranceAida International
    
    FranceOrmodent Belgique, S.A.
    
    BelgiumOrmodent L.D.A
    
    PortugalOrmodent S.A.
    
    FranceSDS de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoKerr Corporation
    
    DelawareKerr Australia Pty. Limited
    
    New South WalesKerr (Europe) A.G
    
    SwitzerlandKerr GmbH
    
    GermanyKerr Italia S.p.A
    
    ItalyMetrex Research Corporation
    
    WisconsinSybron Dental Specialties, Inc. Japan
    
    JapanSybron Canada Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareSybron Canada Limited Partner Company
    
    Nova ScotiaSybron Canada General Partner Company
    
    Nova ScotiaSybron Canada Funding Limited Partnership
    
    Nova ScotiaSybron Canada Limited
    
    CanadaHawe Neos Holding AG
    
    SwitzerlandKerrHawe S.A.
    
    SwitzerlandKerr U.K. Limited
    
    EnglandAnalytic Endodontics U.K. Limited
    
    EnglandPinnacle Products, Inc.
    
    WisconsinKERRSPOFA LTD
    
    Cayman IslandsGP eta s.r.o
    
    Czech RepublicSpofaDental a.s
    
    Czech Republic000 SPOFA DENTAL
    
    Russian FederationSPOFA-DENTAL a.s. Slovak Republic
    
    Slovak RepublicMIFAM Teeth Sp. Z o. o
    
    Poland
# AAO Practice Manual

      Print Manual          Table of Contents    

## About the Administrative Appeals Office Practice Manual

The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) conducts administrative review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officers’ decisions regarding immigration benefit requests in order to promote consistency and accuracy in the interpretation of immigration law and policy. We have appellate jurisdiction over approximately fifty different types of immigration applications and petitions.

The AAO Practice Manual describes rules, procedures, and recommendations for practice before the AAO.  It is organized into seven chapters, including:
                - An overview of our office, history and jurisdiction;
                - Guidance for attorneys and accredited representatives about the representation of parties before the AAO;
                - Information regarding appeals, motions, and certifications;
                - Instructions on how to contact us; and
                - Additional resources.

The AAO Practice Manual also includes a keyword search function, table of contents, and links to relevant Immigration and Nationality Act and Code of Federal Regulations sections in order to make it easier to find relevant information. Citations to statutes, regulations, case law, authoritative sources, and other explanatory references generally appear in footnotes rather than the body of the text.

We will update the AAO Practice Manual periodically.  We welcome and encourage the public to provide comments and propose improvements.  Please mail or fax any comments or suggestions to us with “AAO Practice Manual” in the subject line.  See Chapter 6.1 of the AAO Practice Manual for our contact information.

The AAO Practice Manual does not replace or modify any legal authority or USCIS policy.  It does not create any substantive or procedural right or benefit that is legally enforceable by any party against the United States or its agencies or officers or any other person.

Last Reviewed/Updated: 04/18/2018

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 99.1

ABN AMRO Company Logo Here

ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.
4242 North Harlem avenue
Norridge, Illinois 60706-1204
(708) 456-0400

Affiliates:
LaSalle Bank
LaSalle Home Mortgage
Standard Federal Bank

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned, an officer of ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.,
(the "participant"), hereby certifies as follows:

1.  I have made, or caused to be made under my supervision
     a review of the activities of ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.
     during the preceding calendar year ending December 31, 2000,
     with respect to performance under the

and

2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, there is
     as of this date, no default by ABN AMRO in the fulfillment
     of any of it's obligations under this issue.

In witness whereof the undersigned has this Certificate of Compliance
this 1st day of March, 2001.


ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.
By:  /s/ Renee' B. Dettman
       Renee' B. Dettman
       Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Active Power, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Clishem, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ James A. ClishemJames A. ClishemPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJuly 28, 2008
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5965 

To designate certain Federal land within the Monongahela National Forest 

as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Mr. MOLLOHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To designate certain Federal land within the Monongahela 

National Forest as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Monongahela Con5 servation Legacy Act of 2010’’. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5965 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND 

2 IN MONONGAHELA NATIONAL FOREST, WEST 

3 VIRGINIA, AS WILDERNESS. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—In furtherance of the purposes of 

5 the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the Federal 

6 land within the Monongahela National Forest in the State 

7 of West Virginia, comprising approximately 6,042 acres, 

8 as generally depicted on the map titled ‘‘North Fork 

9 Mountain’’ and dated July 19, 2010, are designated as 

10 a wilderness area for inclusion in the National Wilderness 

11 Preservation System, and shall be known as the ‘‘North 

12 Fork Mountain Wilderness’’. 

13 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—Subject to valid existing 

14 rights, the Federal lands designated as wilderness by sub15 section (a) shall be administered by the Secretary of Agri16 culture in accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 

17 1131 et seq.). 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE OF WILDERNESS.—With re19 spect to the Federal lands designated by subsection (a), 

20 any reference in the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et 

21 seq.) to the effective date of the Wilderness Act shall be 

22 deemed to be a reference to the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ANDREW TOUCHSTONE, C/O TERI TOUCHSTONE,

Petitioners

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (TOUCHSTONE AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 509 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Unassociated Document


    AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO

    PRIME
SUN POWER INC.

    COMMON
STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT “A-1”

    


    THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT “A-1” (this “Amendment”) is
made as of May 22, 2008, by and between PRIME SUN POWER INC. (the “Company”)
and ARIMATHEA LIMITED,
or its registered assigns (the “Warrant
Holder”).  The parties hereto herby agree, for value received,
to amend that certain Common Stock Purchase Warrant “A-1,” issued as of May 10,
2008 (the “Warrant”),
as set forth below.  Capitalized terms not expressly defined herein
shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Warrant.

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company’s Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best interests
of the Company and its shareholders to amend the original warrant number A-1
granted to the Warrant Holder;

    


    NOW,
THEREFORE:

    


    1.           Exhibit
A to the Warrant shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:

    


    EXHIBIT
A

    


    This
Warrant shall vest and become exercisable upon its execution by the parties
hereto.

    


    


    2.           All
other terms and conditions of the Warrant shall be and remain in full force and
effect as therein written, except as expressly waived or modified by this
Amendment.

    


    3.           This
Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall
constitute an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one
instrument.

    


    5.           In
the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this
Amendment and the provisions of the Warrant, the provisions of this Amendment
shall govern and control to the extent of such conflict or
inconsistency.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed by
the authorized officer as of the date first above stated and agreed by the
Warrant Holder.

     

     

    
      
        	PRIME SUN POWER
      INC., a Nevada corporation	 
	 	 
	 	 	 
	
                By:
      

              	 	 
	 	Name:  Barbara
      Salz	 
	 	Title:    Corporate
      Secretary	 
	 	 	 


      

    

    
 

    
      
        
          	WARRANT
      HOLDER:  ARIMATHEA LIMITED	 
	 	 
	 	 	 
	
                  By:
      

                	 	 
	 	Name:  	 
	 	Title:
Exhibit 99.1  Officer's Certificate as to Compliance for the Series
              2000-5 Certificates dated as of March 21, 2001

              WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                         OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities
Corp., formerly PNC Mortgage Securities Corp., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company and on his
own behalf for purposes of the Company's Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2000-5, as follows:
     1.   I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting Second Vice
          President of the Company.
     2.   Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the
          meanings ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
          related to the above-referenced series of Certificates.
     3.   I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
          Certificate on behalf of the Company.
     4.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
          preceding calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been
          made under my supervision.
     5.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master
          Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
          throughout such year.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 21, 2001.


                              By:  /s/ Richie Moore
                                   ----------------------
                                   Richie Moore
                                   Second Vice President