alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#               G-28I, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney in Matters Outside the Geographical Confines of the United States

Use this form to provide notice that an attorney admitted to practice of the law in a country other than the United States seeks to appear before DHS in a matter outside the geographical confines of the United States.

## Forms and Document Downloads

Form G-28I  (PDF, 881.24 KB)

Instructions for Form G-28I  (PDF, 211.68 KB)

## Form Details

05/23/18. We will publish a new edition of this form soon. In the meantime, you may continue using the 05/23/18 edition despite the expiration date. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

File this form with the application or petition submitted to a DHS office outside the geographical confines of the United States. This form may not be filed with matters in offices within the United States.

You can find the filing fee for Form G-28I by visiting our Fee Schedule page.  

**Filing Tips:** Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.**Also, be sure to have the applicant, petitioner, requestor, or respondent sign the form! We will reject any unsigned form.

04/03/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### Montgomery Light & Traction Co. *v.*Riverside Company.

*Damage to Team.*

(Decided November 7, 1914.

66 South. 459.)

*Appeal and Error; Revieto; Discretion of Trial Court; New Trial.*— Where the charge of the trial court was calculated to mislead, and on that ground the trial judge awax*ded a new trial, his action will not be reviewed on appeal; his action evidencing the fact that in his opinion the charge did mislead the jury.

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. Gaston Guntek.

Action by the Riverside Company against tlie Montgomery Light & Traction Company, for damages to wagon and team. There was judgment for defendant which was set aside on motion of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Rtjshton, Williams & Crenshaw, for appellant.

The giving of the charges was without injury, if error. Rule 45, Sup. Ct. Pr. 29 Cyc., 654; 81 S. W. 566; 73 S. W. 1073. There ivas no error in giving charge 12.

Hill, Hill, Wi-iiting & Stern, and R. T. Rives, for appellee.

The granting of a new trial was Avithin the discretion of the trial court, and the fact that he did grant it was evidence of his opinion that the charges did mislead, and hence, the neiv trial was properly *granted.*— So. *By. v.*Jones, 143 Ala. 325; *B. B. L. & P. Go. v. ByoAv,*148 Ala. 69; *B. B. L. <£ P. Go. n. Clark,*41 South. 829; *Bandall v. B. B. L. & P. Go-.,*158 Ala. 532.

MAYFIELD, J.

This action ivas by appellee against appellant, to recover damages to a wagon and team of *381mules, the result of a collision with one of appellant’s street cars. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant street car company, which verdict was set aside on appellee’s motion; and from the judgment so setting aside the verdict, and awarding a new trial, appellant appeals.

The trial court granted the new trial upon the ground that he had erroneously instructed the jury, at appellant’s request, as to the doctrine of contributory negligence. At best these charges were calculated to mislead the jury, and we will not reverse the court for granting the new trial, if, in his opinion, the charges did so mislead the jury.

Affirmed.

Anderson, C. J., and McClellan and de Graffenried, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20436-20437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of the Secretary of Defense; Change in Meeting Date of the 
DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group B (Microelectronics) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a change to a closed session 
meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900. Tuesday, April 25, 2000. This 
meeting replaces the meeting that was to be held on Thursday, March 16, 
2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Elise Rabin, AGED Secretariat, 1745 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, 
Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), 
and through the DDR&E, to the Director Defense Advanced Research 
Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing 
an effective research and development program in the field of electron 
devices.
    The Working Group B meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the military proposes to initiate with 
industry, universities or in their laboratories. The microelectronics 
area includes such programs on semiconductor materials, integrated 
circuits, charge coupled devices and memories. The review will include 
classified program details throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, (5 
U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d)(1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(1)(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to 
the public.


[[Page 20437]]


    Dated: April 11, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-9415 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covad Communications Group, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Richman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/S/    MARK RICHMAN





Mark Richman


Chief Financial Officer


August 8, 2002
EX-10.16






 Confidential Treatment Requested by Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. 

Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. Section 200.83 
  

 Exhibit 10.16 
 



 
  

			
	TO:	  	CRAIG CAPPEL
		
	FROM:	  	STEVE ESTES
		
	DATE:	  	JULY 8, 2019
		
	SUBJECT:	  	PLANNED ISSUANCE OF RESTRICTED STOCK

  
  

As we have discussed, a critical component of our ongoing business strategy for Reynolds Consumer Products LLC will be to explore opportunities for the
business that could lead to an Initial Public Offering (IPO) of the business or potentially a divestiture of the associated business entities. Your assistance is needed by Reynolds as we work through this process to help prepare the business for a
successful transaction. 
 If the IPO is successful, the company whose shares are registered in the IPO will issue you Restricted Stock at the completion of
the IPO. The number of shares in this grant equals $231,750 divided by the IPO price as of the date of the grant, rounded to the nearest whole share. Vesting for the restricted stock will occur over a 3-year
period with 1/3 vesting after 12-months from the successful IPO; 1/3 vesting after 24-months from the successful IPO; and, 1/3 vesting after 36-months from the successful IPO. You must be an employee of the Company or one of its affiliates on the applicable vesting date to receive such shares. 

Should there be a business sale instead of an IPO, you will receive $231,750 in cash in lieu of Restricted Stock. For purposes hereof, a business sale means a
sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or a sale of more than 50% of the equity of the Company or such entity. This cash payment will be made in the following manner: 

1⁄2 Payable
30-days post-closing of the sale 
 1⁄2 Payable 180-days post-closing of the sale 
 This memo does not change your
status as an “at-will” employee and does not guarantee your employment for any specific period of time. The Company reserves the right to terminate you at any time and for any or no reason. Any
Restricted Stock issued or cash payment made pursuant to this memo shall be subject to regular tax withholdings and other authorized deductions and will not be treated as compensation for any purpose under any benefit plans or programs, unless
statutorily required. 
 This memo is provided to summarize the agreement that has been reached in this regard between the Company and the employee. Should
an IPO be completed, a formal grant letter for the Restricted Stock will be provided to the employee that documents all terms and conditions related to the grant. 

//s// Steve Estes
1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WINMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 22-1829 (JDB)

ESF, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of [5] defendant The Academy of the Holy Cross’s motion to dismiss, 

[7] defendant ESF, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, and the entire record herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendants’ motions to dismiss are GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Dated: February 6, 2023
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6205 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, as the ‘‘Private Isaac T. 

Cortes Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 

Mr. CROWLEY (for himself, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. 

BISHOP of New York, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. HALL of New York, 

Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. 

LEE of New York, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. MAFFEI, Mrs. MALONEY, Mrs. 

MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. MCMAHON, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. 

MURPHY of New York, Mr. NADLER of New York, Mr. OWENS, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. TONKO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, and Mr. WEINER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, as 

the ‘‘Private Isaac T. Cortes Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRIVATE ISAAC T. CORTES POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6205 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Private 

2 Isaac T. Cortes Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private Isaac T. 

7 Cortes Post Office’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,907,790
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          69,479
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,107,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 62,729,666
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      11,672,126
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        11,677,261
<LOANS>                                    120,945,210
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,540,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             207,710,593
<DEPOSITS>                                 172,051,448
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,744,318
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,195,547
<LONG-TERM>                                 16,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,996,781
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,222,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             207,710,593
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,171,149
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,357,957
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               109,883
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,638,989
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,539,896
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,266,134
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,372,855
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  235,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (5,704)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,107,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,136,580
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,136,580
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   761,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.04
<LOANS-NON>                                    198,934
<LOANS-PAST>                                   145,814
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                198,934
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,360,148
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   54,992
<RECOVERIES>                                       563
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,540,719
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,464,221
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         76,498
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Emile J. Jordan certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OraLabs Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Acts Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.





Dated November 21, 2005                                 /S/ Emile J. Jordan
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHARLES MAYNARD COLONY AND
PAUL MARKLEY, LATE, TRADING AS

HAWKWING PARTNERSHIP

v.

DOBERMAN GROUP, INC., WALTER
DOBOZYNSKI, CLARENCE KAUFFMAN,

STEVEN CONN AND HENRY OBER

PETITION OF: DOBERMAN GROUP, INC., WALTER DOBOZYNSKI, CLARENCE KAUFFMAN, STEVEN CONN

AND HENRY OBER :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 305 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7205

JAMES CLINTON FORMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN OF GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-00-555-7)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Clinton Forman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Clinton Forman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Forman v. Warden, No. CA-00-555-7 (W.D. Va. July 18,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ImproveNet, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ( "ImproveNet") on Form 10-QSB, for the period ended March 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Homayoon J. Farsi, Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of ImproveNet.

ImproveNet, Inc.

/s/ Homayoon J. Farsi
---------------------------------------
Homayoon J. Farsi
Acting Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 20, 2005
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 20-07

IN RE: COURT CLOSED ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 24 AND MONDAY, DECEMBER 31, 2007

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be

closed on Monday, December 24 and Monday, December 31, 2007.

For purposes of computation of time, under the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure,

Monday, December 24 and Monday, December 31, 2007, will be considered days when the Clerk's

Office has been closed. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: December 4, 2007 FOR THE COURT:

 / s /

NORMAN Y. HERRING

Clerk of the Court