alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT


     This agreement (the "Amendment") is made and entered
into on March 29, 2004 by and between Media and
Entertainment.com, Inc. ("M&E") and Winsonic Holdings, Ltd.
("Winsonic").

                     W I T N E S S E T H


     WHEREAS, M&E and Winsonic have entered into an Addendum
dated December 11, 2003 to the Existing Agreement between
M&E and Winsonic;

     WHEREAS, M&E and Winsonic desire to amend the Addendum
conditioned upon the terms and conditions set forth herein.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the
covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties
agree as follows:

  1.   The last sentence in paragraph 9 is revised to read as
     follows:  "The new agreement finalizing this binding
     Addendum shall close upon the approval of the Audited
     Financials no later than April 30, 2004.

  2.   Other than as provided herein, the Addendum remains in
     full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREAS, the parties hereto have executed
this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.



                         MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT.COM, INC.


                          By: /s/ Jon J. Jannotta
                             ---------------------
                          Jon J. Jannotta, V.P.


                         WINSONICS HOLDING, Ltd.



                         By: /s/ Winston Johnson
                            ----------------------
                          Winston Johnson, Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[I.D. 042401C]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    <IT>Agency<RM>: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
(NOAA).
    <IT>Title<RM>: Northeast Red Crab Vessel Trip and IVR Reports.
    <IT>Form Number(s)<RM>: None.
    <IT>OMB Approval Number<RM>: None.
    <IT>Type of Request<RM>: Emergency submission.
    <IT>Burden Hours<RM>: 26.
    <IT>Number of Respondents<RM>: 10.
    <IT>Average Hours Per Response<RM>: 5 minutes for a Vessel Trip 
Report, 4 minutes for a Interactive Voice Response Report.
    <IT>Needs and Uses<RM>: Fishermen who have obtained a Letter of 
Authorization in order to fish for, catch, possess, transport, land, or 
process at sea more than 100 pounds of red crab from the U.S. Exclusive 
Economic Zone of the western Atlantic Ocean must submit Vessel Trip 
Reports (logbooks) on their fishing catch and effort and Interactive 
Voice Response (IVR) system reports on their catch. IVR reports are 
made weekly to allow closer monitoring of catch than is possible 
through the monthly submission of the Vessel Trip Reports. These 
requirements are needed to manage the fishery and prevent overfishing.
    <IT>Affected Public<RM>: Business or other for-profit 
organizations, individuals or households.
    <IT>Frequency<RM>: Weekly for IVR report, monthly for a Vessel Trip 
Report.
    <IT>Respondent's Obligation<RM>: Mandatory.
    <IT>OMB Desk Officer<RM>: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Madeleine Clayton, Departmental Paperwork 
Clearance Officer, (202) 482-3129, Department of Commerce, Room 6086, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 
Internet at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d202e010c141902032d09020e430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcf1ffd0ddc5c8d3d2fcd8d3df92dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: April 24, 2001.
Madeleine Clayton,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief 
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10655 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                        1,762,000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                       1,750,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  10,000
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,760,000
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      216,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            216,000
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                     1,762,000
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                            1,000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                            1,000
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                            0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     (218,000)
<NET-ASSETS>                                 1,544,000
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                                    0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                       0
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                             0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    (134,000)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        (134,000)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                      0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         1,822,000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                         1,678.00
<PER-SHARE-NII>                               (134.00)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                              0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                           1,544.00
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                      0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM C. RESCH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 18 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of January, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 10(c)

               First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment
                    Agreement dated March 21, 1996, between
                   Metatec Corporation and Jeffrey M. Wilkins



                           FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED
                       AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                       ---------------------------------

         This is an amendment made effective March 21, 1996, to the Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement dated March 23, 1993 (the "Agreement"), between
Metatec Corporation, a Florida corporation (the "Company"), and Jeffrey M.
Wilkins ("Mr. Wilkins"), who hereby agree as follows:

         Section 1.       INCENTIVE BONUS PAYMENTS.  The annual bonuses payable
to Mr. Wilkins under Section 6 of the Agreement hereafter shall be payable in
quarterly installments, under the same general policies and procedures
applicable to the payment of incentive bonuses to the Company's other executive
personnel; provided that in the event Mr. Wilkins receives payments for any or
all of the first three fiscal quarters in any fiscal year in an aggregate 
amount which exceeds the annual bonus payable for that fiscal year, the Company
shall have the right to offset such excess against the amounts next payable by 
the Company under the Agreement until such excess is fully recovered by the 
Company or, if such offsets are insufficient to permit the recovery of such 
excess, require Mr. Wilkins to repay the unrecovered portion of such excess.

         Section 2.       CONSTRUCTION.  In the event of any inconsistency
between the provisions of this amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of
this amendment shall control.  Except as modified by this amendment, the
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect without change.


                             METATEC CORPORATION
                             
                             
                             By /s/ William H. Largent
                               ----------------------------------
                                    William H. Largent, Executive
                                    Vice President
                             
                             
                                /s/ Jeffrey M. Wilkins
                               ----------------------------------
                                    JEFFREY M. WILKINS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6269 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6269

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for burial 
in national cemeteries for certain members of the reserve components of 
the Armed Forces and National Guard, and to increase the amount payable 
    by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the burial and funeral 
                     expenses of certain veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

 Ms. Shea-Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for burial 
in national cemeteries for certain members of the reserve components of 
the Armed Forces and National Guard, and to increase the amount payable 
    by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the burial and funeral 
                     expenses of certain veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERSONS ELIGIBLE FOR INTERMENT IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2402 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(9) Subject to section 5303A(b)(4) of this title, any member of a 
reserve component of the Armed Forces, and any member of the Army 
National Guard or the Air National Guard, who performed a period of 
active duty for training and was discharged or released from such 
period of active duty for training under conditions that were other 
than dishonorable.''.
    (b) Minimum Service Requirements for Certain Individuals.--Section 
5303A(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(4) For purposes of section 2402(9) of this title, the minimum 
active duty service requirements under this subsection shall apply to a 
period of active duty for training in the same manner that such 
requirements apply to a period of active duty.''.

SEC. 2. BURIAL AND FUNERAL EXPENSES OF CERTAIN VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2302(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``$300'' and inserting ``$500''.
    (b) Death in Department Facility; Plot Allowance.--Section 2303 of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``$300'' each 
place it appears and inserting ``$500''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to deaths 
occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 30684 Summary Calendar

OSCAR HILLS, IV,
Petitioner

- Appellant

v. WARDEN M. D. CARVAJAL , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:12

- CV

- 3061

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Oscar Hills, IV, federal prisoner # 05251

- 095, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. He argues that his remedy under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for challenging his wire fraud convictions is inadequate and ineffective because this court, after partially grant ing him a certificate of appealabil i ty on an issue raised in his § 2255 motion, remanded his case to the district court instead of addressing his appeal and reversing his convictions.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 21, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-30684 Document: 00512449951 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/21/2013No. 13

- 30684 He also complains that the district court did not address his claim of actual innocence. Finally, he argues that it was proper for him to raise his claims in a § 2241 petition because he is challenging the fact and duration of his unconstitutional confinement. As a general rule, a federal prisoner who seeks to collaterally challenge the legality of his conviction or sentence must file a § 2255 motion. Padilla v. United States , 416 F.3d 424, 426

- 27 (5th Cir. 2005). Such claims may be raised in a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of § 2255(e) only if the prisoner

s hows that the § 2255 remedy is “ inadequate or ineffective to test th e legality of his detention.” § 2255(e). Hills has not made such a showing as he has not established that his claim s are base d on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision establishing that he was convicted of a nonexistent offense. See Padilla , 416 F.3d at 426

- 27; Reyes

- Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). T he district court’s dismissal of Hi lls’s § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED. Hills’ s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

2 Case: 13-30684 Document: 00512449951 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/21/2013
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________ ________________ No. 14

- 12881

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:11

- cr
- 00248

- MMH

- JRK

- 2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus AMY ELIZABETH NEWBY,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (March 23, 2015) Case: 14-12881 Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Before WILSON , FAY, and RIPPLE , * Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM : Amy Elizabeth Newby appeals her 15

- month sentence, imposed within the guideline range, for committing fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. On appeal, Newby contends that the district court ’s factual findings were insufficient with respect to the loss amount for which she was held accountable , and that the district court erred when it declined to apply a mitigating role reduction. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the relevant law, and having had the benefit of oral argument , we find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED
.

* Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior Circuit Judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

Case: 14-12881 Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Page: 2 of 2
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 10

- 00524

- CV

C & A TRUCKING, INC.

, Appellant

v.

Sylvia HETHERLY

, Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court

, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09

- 07

- 48163

- CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca S immons , Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 29, 2010

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint m otion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                                                                                           |   |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  May 19,  2011 | /s/ David K. Young                                                                                                                        |   |
|                                     | David K. Young                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                                     | President, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----

----
# Extend Your Stay

File Online

A request for an extension of stay (EOS) is generally filed on a Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129) or Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status (Form I-539), depending upon the nonimmigrant classification the petitioner or applicant seeks to extend. The instructions for Form I-539 and Form I-129 provide detailed information regarding who may file each form. Supplemental Information for Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status (Form I-539A) or Petition for a CNMI-Only Nonimmigrant Transitional Worker (Form I-129CW) may also be filed, where applicable. If you remain in the United States longer than authorized, you may be barred from returning and/or you may be removed (deported) from the United States. Check the date in the lower right-hand corner of your Form I-94, Arrival-Departure Record, to determine the date your authorized stay expires. We recommend that you apply to extend your stay at least 45 days before your authorized stay expires.

You may apply to extend your stay if:
                - You were lawfully admitted into the United States with a nonimmigrant visa;
                - Your nonimmigrant visa status remains valid;
                - You have not committed any crimes that make you ineligible for a visa;
                - You have not violated the conditions of your admission; and
                - Your passport is valid and will remain valid for the duration of your stay.

You may not apply to extend your stay if you were admitted to the United States in the following categories:
                - Visa Waiver Program;
                - Crew member (D nonimmigrant visa);
                - In transit through the United States (C nonimmigrant visa);
                - In transit through the United States without a visa (TWOV);
                - Fiancé(e) of a U.S. citizen or dependent of a fiancé(e) (K nonimmigrant visa); or
                - Informant (and accompanying family) on terrorism or organized crime (S nonimmigrant visa).

For information on how to apply, see the How Do I: Guides for Nonimmigrants.

## Related Links

### More Information

                - USCIS Policy Manual Volume 2, Part A Nonimmigrant Policies and Procedures

### Forms

                - I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker
                - I-129CW, Petition for a CNMI-Only Nonimmigrant Transitional Worker
                - I-539, Application To Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status
                - I-539A, Supplemental Information for Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status 

### Other USCIS Links

                - Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)

### Non-USCIS Links

                - U.S. Customs and Border Protection

01/24/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.