alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications

I, Qitai Yao, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pingchuan
Pharmaceutical, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this  report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small
business issuer and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  April 14, 2006             /s/ Qitai Yao
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Qitai Yao, Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Rodriguez, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered September 30, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On this appeal, the defendant claims, *inter alia,*that his conviction is against the weight of the evidence and is based on legally insufficient evidence. The defendant contends that the People have failed to establish his identity as one of the perpetrators and have further failed to demonstrate by sufficient evidence that the complainant was ever robbed of any property. The basis of these arguments is the defendant’s claim that the complainant’s testimony was contradictory and incredible as a matter of law.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Furthermore, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

*713We note that the sentence imposed upon defendant was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80) and we find no basis to exercise our discretion to reduce it in the interest of justice.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find that it does not warrant reversal. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7191
SYLVESTER EMERSON WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusCLARENCE BENJAMIN, Captain, Lieber Correctional Institution; SHIRLEY J. TOMLIN, Lieutenant, Lieber Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-2874-3-2BC) Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylvester Emerson Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Bunyan Lewis, Amy L. Gaffney, LEWIS, REEVES & STONE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to compel settlement and denying Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel, a swift and immediate restraining order, and disposition of all pending motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Benjamin , No. CA-93-2874-3-2BC (D.S.C. July 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10384]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Advisory Committee Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the 
following committee meeting:

    Name: Grain Inspection Advisory Committee.
    Date: May 8, 2001.
    Place: Hilton Kansas City Airport, 8801 NW 112th Street, Kansas 
City, MO 64153.
    Time: 7:30 a.m.-5 p.m. on May 8, 2001.
    Purpose: To provide advice to the Administrator of the Grain 
Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) with 
respect to the implementation of the U.S. Grain Standards Act (7 
U.S.C. 71 et seq.).
    The agenda includes a review and discussion of GIPSA's financial 
status, biotechnology, component end-use testing, information 
technology initiatives, the status of the official commodity 
program, and other related issues concerning the delivery of grain 
inspection and weighing services to American agriculture.
    Public participation will be limited to written statements, 
unless permission is received from the Committee Chairman to address 
the Committee orally. Persons, other than members, who wish to 
address the Committee or submit written statements before or after 
the meeting, should contact the Administrator, GIPSA, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, STOP 3601, 
Washington, D.C. 20250-3601, telephone (202) 720-0219 or FAX (202) 
205-9237.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Persons with 
disabilities who require alternative means of communication of 
program information or related accommodations should contact 
Marianne Plaus, telephone (202) 690-3460 or FAX (202) 205-9237.

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-10384 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1011-000 and ER01-1011-001]


Redbud Energy LP; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 25, 2001.
    Redbud Energy LP (Redbud) submitted for filing a rate schedule 
under which Redbud will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions at market-based rates. Redbud also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Redbud requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Redbud.
    On March 29, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Redbud should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Redbud is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Redbud's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 3, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10736 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EX-10.17






 Confidential Treatment Requested by Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. 

Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. Section 200.83 
  

 Exhibit 10.17 
 



 
  

			
	TO:	  	STEPHAN PACE
		
	FROM:	  	STEVE ESTES
		
	DATE:	  	JULY 8, 2019
		
	SUBJECT:	  	PLANNED ISSUANCE OF RESTRICTED STOCK

  
  

As we have discussed, a critical component of our ongoing business strategy for Reynolds Consumer Products LLC will be to explore opportunities for the
business that could lead to an Initial Public Offering (IPO) of the business or potentially a divestiture of the associated business entities. Your assistance is needed by Reynolds as we work through this process to help prepare the business for a
successful transaction. 
 If the IPO is successful, the company whose shares are registered in the IPO will issue you Restricted Stock at the completion of
the IPO. The number of shares in this grant equals $225,102 divided by the IPO price as of the date of the grant, rounded to the nearest whole share. Vesting for the restricted stock will occur over a 3-year
period with 1/3 vesting after 12-months from the successful IPO; 1/3 vesting after 24-months from the successful IPO; and, 1/3 vesting after 36-months from the successful IPO. You must be an employee of the Company or one of its affiliates on the applicable vesting date to receive such shares. 

Should there be a business sale instead of an IPO, you will receive $225,102 in cash in lieu of Restricted Stock. For purposes hereof, a business sale means a
sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or a sale of more than 50% of the equity of the Company or such entity. This cash payment will be made in the following manner: 

1⁄2 Payable
30-days post-closing of the sale 
 1⁄2 Payable 180-days post-closing of the sale 
 This memo does not change your
status as an “at-will” employee and does not guarantee your employment for any specific period of time. The Company reserves the right to terminate you at any time and for any or no reason. Any
Restricted Stock issued or cash payment made pursuant to this memo shall be subject to regular tax withholdings and other authorized deductions and will not be treated as compensation for any purpose under any benefit plans or programs, unless
statutorily required. 
 This memo is provided to summarize the agreement that has been reached in this regard between the Company and the employee. Should
an IPO be completed, a formal grant letter for the Restricted Stock will be provided to the employee that documents all terms and conditions related to the grant. 

//s// Steve Estes
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20976-20977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10319]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-312-053]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Errata Filing

April 20, 2001.
    Take notice that on April 17, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), tendered for filing an Errata Letter Filing in the above-
referenced docket.
    Tennessee states that the Errata Letter Filing contains a complete 
copy of a Gas Transportation Agreement between Tennessee and Virginia 
Power Energy Marketing, Inc. (VEPCO) pursuant to Tennessee's Rate 
Schedule FT-A (FT-A Service Agreement). Tennessee further states that 
the copy of the FT-A Service Agreement that was filed on April 11, 2001 
in this docket inadvertently omitted certain pages of the agreement.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to

[[Page 20977]]

the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and 
interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of 
paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's web site at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10319 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 08**  **- 6896** 

DERRANCE L. RAMSEY , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DANNY BROWN, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Sout h Carolina , at Columbia

. Matthew J. Perry, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 3:07

- cv - 00745

- MJP )

Submitted : October 6, 2010 Decided: March 21 , 2011

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un publ ished per curiam opinion

.

Andrew F. Lindeman n , Robert D. Garfield, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Danny Brown, Jr., appeals the distri ct court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment on the grounds of qualified immunity. Brown takes issue with the district court’s findings and contends that he is entitled to qualified immunity because there are no genuine issues of material fact . However, the respective versions of the facts offered by the parties below were so divergent that judgment as a matter of law is precluded. And “a defendant, entitled to invoke a qualified immunity defense, may not appeal a district court’s summary jud gment order insofar as that order determines whether or not the pretrial record sets forth a ‘genuine’ issue of fact for trial.” Culosi v. Bullock , 596 F.3d 195, 201 (4th Cir. 2010) (quoting Johnson v. Jones , 515 U.S. 304, 319

- 20 (1995)). Accordingly, we dismiss this interlocutory appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### ROWELL et al., Appellants, v. WINSTON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by George P. Row-ell and others against Gustavus S. Winston.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-KSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,419,959
<SECURITIES>                                 1,187,630
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,533,377
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,334,151)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,589,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,420,700
<PP&E>                                       7,833,988
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,827,856)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,869,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,786,288
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,081
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,418,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,869,293
<SALES>                                     21,142,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,142,602
<CGS>                                        7,476,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,476,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,088,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               995,903
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                467,939
<INCOME-TAX>                                   761,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,229,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,229,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2634-007]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for the existing and operating Storage Project, located on Ragged Stream, Caucomgomoc Stream, West Branch and South Branch of the Penobscot River in the Counties of Somerset and Piscataquis, Maine and has prepared a Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project.

                    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference Branch, Room 2-A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.us/​online/​rims.htm.*                     Please call (202) 208-2222 for assistance.                

                    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this notice and should be addressed to David P. Boergers, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, Washington, DC 20426. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

                    Please affix “Storage Project No. 2634-007” to the top page of all comments. For further information,                           ( print page 21383)                        contact John Costello at (202) 219-2914 or                     *john.costello@ferc.fed.us.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10585  Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M