alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Third District ofTexas P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711-2547 

### ALBERT V. ALVAREZ, CSR, RMR Official Court Reporter 345th Judicial DistrictCourt P.O. Box 1748 Austin, Texas 78767 (512)854-9373
January 26, 2015

RE: COA No. 03-14-00738-CV; Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-10-002325 RU 11-C Austin Air, LP, et al. vs. RU Lodging Fund II Acquisition, LLC Dear Mr. Kyle, This is to informyou thatthe Reporter's Record in the above-captioned case is due today and is ready forfiling. However, payment has not been made in its entiretyand thus Iwill notfile the record until I am paid the balance. Ifyou have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you foryour consideration in this matter. Sincerelyyours,

Albert V. Alvarez
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 50-336] 

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a notice appearing in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 23, 2001 (66 FR 20485), that considers issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-65, issued to Northeast Nuclear Energy Company, et al. This action is necessary to correct an erroneous date.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Daniel S. Collins, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-1427, e-mail: DXC1@nrc.gov. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On page 20485, in the third column, in the first complete paragraph, the date is changed                           ( print page 21420)                        from “May 21, 2001,” to read “May 23, 2001.”                 

Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of April 2001. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Michael T. Lesar, 

Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-10617 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
32.2           Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Shallbetter Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry Wong, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By: /s/  Terry Wong, President Date:  September 13, 2006
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Clickable
      Enterprises, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Nicholas Cirillo, Jr., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.








*Date*:
              November 2, 2007*/s/
                Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.**Nicholas
                Cirillo, Jr.*
              *President
                (Principal Executive Officer)*


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             9
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,458
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,328
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,849
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     24,247
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,501
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,511
<LOANS>                                        151,048
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,249
<DEPOSITS>                                     155,485
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,400
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,099
<LONG-TERM>                                     17,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 212,249
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,429
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  974
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   780
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,183
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,765
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,587
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,596
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 100
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,997
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,997
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,218
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.99
<LOANS-NON>                                        151
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,236
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       20
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,308
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,308
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1151

BAYUSH MEHARI,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A29-919-149)

Submitted: August 5, 1997 Decided: August 27, 1997

Before HALL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard S. Bromberg, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Frank W.

Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Howard, Senior

Litigation Counsel, Madeline Henley, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Bayush Mehari seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' opinion and order dismissing her appeal and affirming

as modified the immigration judge's decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. Our review of the

record discloses that the Board's decision is based on substantial

evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the Board. Mehari v. INS, No. A29-919-149 (B.I.A.

Jan. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6400 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6400

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 8, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 111 North 6th Street in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Earl Wilson, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EARL WILSON, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 111 North 6th Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Earl Wilson, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Earl 
Wilson, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1279-000]

Connecticut Energy Cooperative, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 25, 2001.
    Connecticut Energy Cooperative, Inc. (CECI) submitted for filing a 
rate schedule under which CECI will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions at market-based rates. CECI also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, CECI requested 
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by CECI.
    On April 3, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariff and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by CECI should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, CECI 
is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities 
as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any 
security of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption 
is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the 
applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably 
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of CECI's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 3, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet 
athttp://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10743 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134333 & (54) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 134333 

 COA: 267660 
 Wayne CC: 05-006126-01

MARVIN LAVEL JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

peremptory reversal is DENIED. 

t1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Elementary, Secondary, and Informal 
Education; Notice of Meeting

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Elementary, Secondary and 
Informal Education (59).
    Date/Time: May 21 and May 22, 2001, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Place: The Governor's House Hotel, 1615 Rhode Island Ave., NW, 
Washington, DC.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Mr. John S. Bradley, Section Head, Division of 
Elementary, Secondary and Informal Education, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 
(703) 292-8620.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals for the Centers For Learning and Teaching 
Programs submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 24, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10558 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No.  97N-0511]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION: 

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP); Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of  Juice” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD   20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 19, 2001 (66 FR 6138 at 6194), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0466.  The approval expires on March 31, 2004.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                

Dated: April 24, 2001.

William K. Hubbard,

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.

[FR Doc. 01-10709 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Ralph Rigaud, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), entered August 11, 1987, which (1) granted, without a hearing, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence and (2) granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing on that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence consistent herewith.

The People allege that at about 11:42 p.m. on May 11, 1985, Detective Richard Brown observed the defendant in possession of a handgun. It was a loaded and operable .25 caliber automatic gun and was recovered from the defendant by Police Officer Mark Hamilton, who placed him under arrest.

On April 2, 1987, a *Mapp*hearing was held. Prior to calling former Detective Brown the prosecutor stated that the only *Rosario*material that the detective had ever made was an *644entry in his memo book which he had discarded upon his retirement from the Police Department in 1985. The hearing court noted that in *People v Ranghelle*(69 NY2d 56) the Court of Appeals stated that the prosecution’s failure to deliver *Rosario*material to the defense constituted per se error requiring that the conviction be reversed. On the strength of *People v Ranghelle (supra),*and without the detective’s testimony, the hearing court granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the physical evidence against him. It thereupon granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment.

The hearing court’s order must be reversed. The Court of Appeals has described three types of *Rosario*violations: when the prosecution delays in disclosing such material, when they fail to disclose it even though it is in their possession, and when the material has been lost or destroyed *(People v Martinez,*71 NY2d 937, 940; *see also, People v Haupt,*71 NY2d 929). Since, in the instant case, the detective destroyed the *Rosario*material, it is apparent that the facts of this case fit within the third category. The Supreme Court is therefore obligated to determine whether the prosecution failed to exercise care to preserve the material and whether the defendant was prejudiced thereby. If so, the Supreme Court must impose an appropriate sanction *(People v Martinez, supra,*at 940). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### LANEY, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Charles S. Laney against the Rochester Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the referee.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

___________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 128161(85) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 128161 

v COA: 250000 

Oakland CC: 02-183044-FH 

RAYMOND A. MCCULLER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Wayne County Prosecuting 

Attorney for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 4, 2007 

 Clerk