alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-14704

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

Agency No. A206-413-511

JORGE HUMBERTO MENDEZ-GONZALEZ, 

 Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

 Respondent.

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

________________________

(May 17, 2017)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 16-14704 Date Filed: 05/17/2017 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Jorge Humberto Mendez-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions 

for review of an order that expedited his removal from the United States as an alien

convicted of an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1228(b), 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii).

Mendez-Gonzalez argues that his prior conviction is not an aggravated felony and 

that the Department of Homeland Security violated his right to due process during 

his expedited removal proceedings. We dismiss in part and deny in part MendezGonzalez’s petition.

We lack jurisdiction to review the finding that Mendez-Gonzalez’s prior 

conviction is an aggravated felony. Mendez-Gonzalez concedes that he never 

contested the classification of his prior conviction as an aggravated felony, 

although his notice of removal stated that he had ten days to respond and could 

obtain an extension of time for good cause. “[A]bsent a cognizable excuse or 

exception,” we “lack jurisdiction to consider a claim raised in a petition for review 

unless the petitioner has exhausted his administrative remedies.” Amaya–

Artunduaga v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 463 F.3d 1247, 1250 (11th Cir. 2006). We dismiss 

this part of Mendez-Gonzalez’s petition.

The Department did not violate Mendez-Gonzalez’s right to due process. To 

establish a violation of due process, an alien must prove that he was deprived of 

liberty without notice or an opportunity to respond and that he was substantially 

prejudiced by the alleged error. Indrawati v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 779 F.3d 1284, 1299 

Case: 16-14704 Date Filed: 05/17/2017 Page: 2 of 3 
3

(11th Cir. 2015). Mendez-Gonzalez argues that he could not challenge the notice 

of removal because it was written in and explained to him in English, but we 

presume that the Department complied with a regulation requiring it to “provide 

. . . a written translation . . . or explain the contents of the Notice of Intent . . . in a 

language that the alien understands,” 8 C.F.R. § 238.1(b)(2)(v). The record 

contains no evidence that Mendez-Gonzalez requested an interpreter, despite 

having received such assistance in two criminal proceedings. We deny this part of 

Mendez-Gonzalez’s petition.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.

Case: 16-14704 Date Filed: 05/17/2017 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T. Randolph Catanese, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: March 22, 2006

                                        /s/ T. Randolph Catanese
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name: T. Randolph Catanese
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                        and Acting Chief Financial Officer
ex10-6.htm


 


 


Exhibit 10.6


 


 


[OSI LETTERHEAD]


 


 


August 17th, 2009.


 


Dr. Angela Davies


Sr. Director, Clinical Development


 


Dear Angela,


 


I want to thank you for sharing your thoughts and observations with me in our recent conversations.  I appreciate both your input and your candor and, as I hope I have successfully communicated to you, I am convinced that you have the potential to enjoy a long and successful career in a leadership role here at OSI.  In accord with our discussion this past Saturday – and contingent upon you committing to join us at our new campus in Ardsley – I am delighted to offer you the following:


 



	
  

	
·

	
A promotion to Vice-President of Clinical Research – Oncology, initially reporting to Dr. Karsten Witt, Interim Head of Oncology Development.  The position will be at Grade 10 and carries an annual bonus target of 30% base salary;








	
  

	
·

	
Your annual salary will be increased to $330,000, less taxes. This comprises the 5% commitment increase noted in the letter you received in July and an additional promotional increase;








	
  

	
·

	
Membership of the OSI Executive Management Committee;








	
  

	
·

	
A commitment bonus equal to 6 months salary and a relocation package as previously communicated to you in the July letter; and,








	
  

	
·

	
You will receive a lump sum equal to $80,000 less taxes to assist you with your relocation expenses.  This amount may be requested after you commit to join OSI at the new Ardsley campus by submitting a letter in writing to Human Resources requesting payment.  If you voluntarily resign from the Company within 2 years from the time you receive your payment you will be required to re-pay 100% of the amount that was given to you.







 


These changes to your salary, title, grade and EMC membership will be effective immediately upon your acceptance of the offer and its contingent commitment to the Ardsley relocation.  Also, and as we discussed, should you choose to commit in a timely fashion, I will be happy to invite you to join us at the annual EMC strategy retreat scheduled for September 1st-4th in Oxford, UK.  This will be a terrific opportunity for you to come up to speed as our newest EMC member.


 


Angela, I'd be honored to have you choose to continue your career with us in Ardsley and I am convinced that you will have a lot to offer as we embark upon the next exciting chapter in the company's journey.  Should you be willing to do so please let me know as soon as possible and


 







 




  





  











  








 


acknowledge your acceptance of the offer described herein by signing below and returning to Linda Amper.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Colin Goddard


 


Colin Goddard,


Chief Executive Officer


 


Acknowledgement:


 



	
/s/ Angela Davies

	  
	
Dr. Angela Davies

	  





 


 


2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6311 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to authorize the United States Trade 

Representative to take discretionary action if a foreign country is engaging in unreasonable acts, policies, or practices relating to the environment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. 

LEWIS of Georgia, and Mr. DOGGETT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to authorize the United 

States Trade Representative to take discretionary action 

if a foreign country is engaging in unreasonable acts, 

policies, or practices relating to the environment, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN TRADE RE4 LATIONS. 

5 Section 301(d)(3)(B) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

6 U.S.C. 2411(d)(3)(B)) is amended— 

7 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6311 IH

1 (2) in clause (iii)(V), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

4 clause: 

5 ‘‘(iv) constitutes a persistent pattern 

6 of conduct that— 

7 ‘‘(I) fails to effectively enforce 

8 the environmental laws of a foreign 

9 country; 

10 ‘‘(II) waives or otherwise dero11 gates from the environmental laws of 

12 a foreign country or weakens the pro13 tections afforded by such laws; 

14 ‘‘(III) fails to provide for judicial 

15 or administrative proceedings giving 

16 access to remedies for violations of the 

17 environmental laws of a foreign coun18 try; or 

19 ‘‘(IV) fails to provide appropriate 

20 and effective sanctions or remedies for 

21 violations of the environmental laws of 

22 a foreign country.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 04-21 

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

 Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled 

by the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge Mary J. Schoelen, 

having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The Chief 

Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Schoelen would provide substantial service 

necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

 Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

 ORDERED that, effective January 4, 2021, through December 31, 2021, recall-eligible retired 

Judge Schoelen is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). Judge 

Schoelen shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active 

service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. 

It is further 

 ORDERED that Judge Schoelen shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2021 to review 

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other substantial service 

at the request of the Chief Judge and she shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up to 90 days 

or its equivalent. With her consent, Judge Schoelen's service may be extended beyond 90 days. 

 

DATED: January 4, 2021 BY THE COURT: 

MARGARET BARTLEY 

 Chief Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Morgan Stanley Tangible Asset Fund L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      22,555,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,369<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,184,977<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,184,977<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,583,553<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               835,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                747,883
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            747,883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   747,883
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $66,369.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $563,118.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $330,750, accrued
brokerage fees of $67,063, accrued management fees of $45,933 and
service fees payable of $18,373.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(29,303),
net change in unrealized of $1,198,761 and interest income of $414,095.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10584]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP01-157-000]


Georgia-Pacific Corp.; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

April 24, 2001.
    Take notice that on April 16, 2001, Georgia-Pacific Corporation 
(Georgia-Pacific) filed a petition for a declaratory order in the 
above-styled proceeding, requesting that the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission issue an order declaring that a prospective lease or other 
long-term arrangement under which a third-party owner of an industrial 
facility has the right to a portion of the capacity of Georgia-
Pacific's pipeline that crosses the Arkansas/Louisiana border: (1) 
Shall not constitute the transportation of natural gas in interstate 
commerce; and (2) shall not subject such pipeline to any greater 
Commission regulation or oversight than currently in place.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sec. Sec. 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before May 15, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10584 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6118 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, in Washington, 

D.C., as the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6118 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DOROTHY I. HEIGHT POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, 

4 in Washington, D.C., shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30 

(legislative day September 29), 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION


     I, Winston Johnson, principal executive and financial
officer of Media and Entertainment.com, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year
     ended December 31, 2003, which this certification
     accompanies (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
     and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  April 2, 2004


                                   /s/ Winston Johnson
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Principal Executive and Financial
                                   Officer
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5827 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to include 

firearms in the types of property allowable under the 

alternative provision for exempting property from the 

estate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5827 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Gun Own3 ers in Bankruptcy Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS. 

5 Section 522 of title 11, the United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (d) by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(13) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to 

10 exceed $3,000 in value, in a single rifle, shotgun, or 

11 pistol, or any combination thereof.’’, and 

12 (2) in subsection (f)(4)(A)— 

13 (A) in clause (xiv) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

14 end, 

15 (B) in clause (xv) by striking the period at 

16 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and 

17 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(xvi) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to 

19 exceed $3,000 in value, in a single rifle, shotgun, or 

20 pistol, or any combination thereof.’’. 

21 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

22 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub23 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

24 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

25 Act. 
3 

•HR 5827 EH

1 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend2 ments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 

3 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code 

4 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5827 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to inproperty from the estate. under the alternative provision for exempting clude firearms in the types of property allowable
Exhibit 10.1


 


 





Description of the Extension to the Amended
and Restated $250 Million Secured Revolving Credit Agreement


 


November 19, 2019


 


Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated $250 million
secured Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 19, 2018, between Consumers Energy Company and The Bank of Nova Scotia,
the parties have all agreed, effective November 19, 2019, to extend the Termination Date (as defined therein) for a period
of one year to November 19, 2021.
----

----

| 1.  | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the LP. |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 25, 2010                                                                                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                          |
| /s/      Anthony J. Branca                                                                                    |
| Anthony      J. Branca                                                                                        |
| Chief      Financial OfficerICON      Capital Corp. General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-20285

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Tom Grant, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-305-3

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Tom Grant has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Grant has filed a response, in which he raises, among other things, a claim of 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 18, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-20285 Document: 00516169723 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/18/2022
No. 21-20285

2

ineffective assistance of counsel. The record is not sufficiently developed to 

allow us to make a fair evaluation of Grant’s claim of ineffective assistance of 

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Grant’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-20285 Document: 00516169723 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/18/2022