alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit B

                     FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 18th
day  of  April,  2002  by  and  between  HydroChem  Holding,  Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation  (the  "Employer"),  and B. Tom  Carter,  Jr.,  an  individual  (the
"Employee").
RECITALS

A.   Employer and  Employee  entered  into a certain  Employment Agreement as of
December  15,  1993,  which as  amended  by  First,  Second,  Third  and  Fourth
Amendments  thereto  dated as of January 10, 1995,  March 20, 1995,  December 9,
1996,  and April 9, 1998,  respectively,  provided  the terms of  employment  of
Employee by Employer (the "Agreement").

B.   Employer and Employee  desire to further amend the Agreement as hereinafter
provided.
AGREEMENT

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable
consideration,  the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:

1.   Section 6 (d) of the  Agreement, as said  section was amended by the Second
Amendment,  is further  amended by (i) changing the semi colon to a period after
the word "home" in the 14th line of said section,  and (ii) deleting in the same
line  the  phrase  "provided  such  move is made on or  prior  to the  four-year
anniversary of this Agreement."

2.   Section 6 (f) of the Agreement, which was added by the Fourth Amendment, is
amended by deleting the phrase "Seven  Thousand  Dollars  ($7,000)" in the third
line of said section and  substituting  the phrase "Twelve Thousand Five Hundred
Dollars ($12,500)" in lieu thereof.




                           [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have duly executed this Fifth Amendment to
Employment Agreement as of the year and date first written above.


HydroChem Holding, Inc.


By:  /s/ Kelvin Collard
     ------------------
     Kelvin Collard, Vice President and
     Chief Financial Officer

EMPLOYEE


/s/ B. Tom Carter, Jr.
----------------------
B. Tom Carter, Jr.


     In consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration,
the undersigned hereby  unconditionally  guarantees the punctual  performance by
HydroChem  Holding,  Inc.,  of all its duties and  obligations  under this Fifth
Amendment to Employment Agreement.


HydroChem Industrial Services, Inc.


By:  /s/ Kelvin Collard
     ------------------
     Kelvin Collard, Vice President and
     Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Agnes M., Respondent. Jere B. Fletcher, Appellant.

In a proceeding to settle the final account of a conservator, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cerrato, J.), entered May 4, 1988, which awarded the conservator only $4,500 for uncompensated legal services performed for the conservatee.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

A review of the record indicates no abuse of discretion in the determination of counsel fees. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6259 

To require approval to enter into trade agreements with foreign countries, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. SPACE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require approval to enter into trade agreements with 

foreign countries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vote On Trade Every 

5 time Act’’ or ‘‘VOTE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPROVAL TO ENTER INTO TRADE AGREEMENTS. 

7 (a) APPROVAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, the President may not enter into a trade 

9 agreement with one or more foreign countries unless the 

10 electors of the United States authorize the President to 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6259 IH

1 take such action. The President, in consultation with State 

2 election officials, shall promulgate such regulations as may 

3 be necessary to carry out the previous sentence. 

4 (b) PUBLIC HEARINGS.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Before entering into negotia6 tions to enter into a trade agreement with one or 

7 more foreign countries, the United States Trade 

8 Representative shall hold a series of public hearings 

9 throughout the United States to receive input on the 

10 effects of the trade agreement on economic growth 

11 and employment in the United States. 

12 (2) LOCATION OF HEARINGS.—The public hear13 ings required under paragraph (1) should be held in 

14 areas of the United States that have been, are, or 

15 may be adversely affected by trade agreements with 

16 foreign countries, as determined by the Department 

17 of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

18 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘trade 

19 agreement’’ means any bilateral, regional, or multilateral 

20 free trade agreement. 

21 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on 

22 the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with 

23 respect to entering into a trade agreement with one or 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6259 IH

1 more foreign countries on or after the date of the enact2 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Stratus      Services Group, Inc.**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. Section 1350)**

| 1.     | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | the                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Dated:                February 14, 2007 |                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | By:                /s/ Joseph J. Raymond             |
|                                    | Joseph                J. Raymond                     |
|                                    | Chairman                of the Board of Directors,   |
|                                    | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GILBERTO G. ROSSATY, a.k.a. Gilberto

Rossatti Mendez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71903

Agency No. A072-523-182

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Gilberto G. Rossaty, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his

motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen,

FILED

SEP 30 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-71903

He v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2007), we deny the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Rossaty’s motion to reopen

as untimely and number barred, where Rossaty filed his motion approximately four

years after his order of removal became administratively final, had filed at least

seven prior motions to reopen, and did not demonstrate the applicability of any

exception to the time and numerical limitations on motions to reopen. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229a(c)(7)(A), (C)(I); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).

We decline to treat the Attorney General’s invitation to strike Rossaty’s

opening brief as a motion to strike. See United States v. Rowe, 96 F.3d 1294, 1298

n.2 (9th Cir. 1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
99.6

Grant Thornton company logo here

Accountants and Management Consultants
Grant Thornton LLP
The US Member Firm of Grant Thornton International

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUTNS ON MANAGEMENT'S
ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS
SET FORTH IN THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
MORTGAGE BANKERS

Board of Directors
Countywide Credit Industries, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, about Countrywide
Credit Industries, Inc. Subsidiaries (which includes its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.) ("the Company")
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended
February 28,2001 included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based
on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accounts and,
accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Countrywide Credit
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.) complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
ended February 28, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/: Grant Thornton LLP
Grant Thornton LLP

Los Angeles California
March 16, 2001

Suite 300
1000 Wilshire Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90017-2464
T 213-627-1717
F 213-624-6793


<PAGE>


Countrywide Company Logo Here
4500 Park Granda
Calabasas, California 91302
(818) 225-3000

March 16, 2001

Grant Thornton LLP
1000 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90017


Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended February 17, 2001, Countrywide Credit
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.) ("the Company") has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except as disclosed in the
attached Schedule of Findings to the report.  As of and for this same
period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amounts of $230,000,000.


/s/:  Carlos M. Garcia
Carlos M. Garcia
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: May 8, 2001.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/
E2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Tracy A. Shahan, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIH/NIAMS, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4952.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10351 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### PECK v. DIETERICH et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

July 14, 1894.)

Appeal from Schenectady county court. Action by Arthur R. Peck against Johanna Dieterich and another, as executors of Lewis C. Dieterich, deceased. From a judgment affirming a judgment of the justice of the peace, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Jacob W. Clute, for appellant. Walter Briggs, for respondents.

MAYHAM, P. J.

While the order for the cash register, signed by the defendant referred to a sample machine exhibited to him at the time of signing the same, it also contained a provision that the register was to be delivered in good working cond'fon. There was evidence before the jury from which they could reasonably find that that provision of the order was not complied with. The jury having reached that conclusion by their verdict, we think the county court was right in affirming the judgment entered, upon this verdict, within section 3063 of the Code of= Civil Procedure. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Amaro, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Burton Hecht, J.), rendered on June 17, 1981, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00501-CR

EX PARTE FRANCISCO 

DEJESU

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

We have considered Appellant’s “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

 /s/ Bob McCoy

BOB MCCOY

JUSTICE

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 23, 2014
# Temporary Final Rule to Increase Employment Authorization and/or Employment Authorization Document Validity for Eligible Renewal Applicants

On April 8, 2024, the Department of Homeland Security published a temporary final rule (89 FR 24628) that temporarily increases the automatic extension period of employment authorization and/or Employment Authorization Documents (Form I-766 or EAD) from up to 180 days to up to 540 days from the expiration date on the face of the EAD.

The temporary 540-day automatic extension period is available to certain applicants who timely filed Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, renewal applications on or after Oct. 27, 2023, and whose applications remain pending on April 8, 2024.

The temporary increase of employment authorization and/or EADs to up to 540 days also applies to eligible applicants who timely file a Form I-765 renewal application on or after April 8, 2024, and on or before Sept 30, 2025. Under the temporary final rule, the automatic extension period will revert to up to 180 days for those who timely file Form I-765 renewal applications after Sept. 30, 2025.

Employers can use the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) Automatic Extension Calculator****on I-9 Central for help calculating their employee’s extension.

See the USCIS announcement for more information and refer to Section 5.0 of the M-274 for updated Form I-9 guidance. 

04/08/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
<PAGE>





                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Metatec International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Christopher A. Munro, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/  Christopher A. Munro
--------------------------------------------

Christopher A. Munro
Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2003
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6096 

To rescind certain amounts appropriated to the Bureau of the Census, to 

reduce the Federal budget deficit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 10, 2010 

Mr. EDWARDS of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on 

Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To rescind certain amounts appropriated to the Bureau of 

the Census, to reduce the Federal budget deficit, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reduce Our Deficits 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESCISSION. 

7 From the unobligated balances made available for 

8 ‘‘Department of Commerce—Bureau of the Census—PeriVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:59 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6096.IH H6096

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6096 IH

1 odic Censuses and Programs’’, $1,600,000,000 is re2 scinded. 

3 SEC. 3. USE OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS TO REDUCE THE FED4 ERAL BUDGET DEFICIT AND NATIONAL DEBT. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 

6 amounts received by the Federal Government as rentals 

7 or royalties shall be deposited into the general fund of the 

8 Treasury and used for Federal budget deficit reduction 

9 or, if there is no Federal budget deficit, for reducing the 

10 national debt in such a manner as the Secretary of the 

11 Treasury considers appropriate. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
American Physicians Capital, Inc. (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, as amended, for the
period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  April 29, 2004


/s/ R. Kevin Clinton
-----------------------------------
R. Kevin Clinton
President and Chief Executive Officer


 /s/ Frank H. Freund
-----------------------------------
Frank H. Freund
Senior Executive Vice President, Treasurer
And Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 10.2**

 

**AMENDMENTTO THEUNOVA, INC. RESTORATION PLAN**

The UNOVA, Inc.Restoration Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended in the following manner, inaccordance with Section 11.1 of the Plan, and effective as of June 30, 2006,except where another date is provided herein.

1.                                       Section3.27 is hereby amended by adding the following new definition with allsubsequent sections renumbered accordingly:

3.27         Rule of 70 Employee

The term Rule of 70 Employee shall have the same meaning as underSection 3.35 of the Intermec Pension Plan, except that, for purposes of thisPlan, such individual must also be an Affected Employee.

2.                                       Section4.1 is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof:

Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any Affected Employee who, onor after July 1, 2006, commences employment with, or is re-hired by, the Companyshall not be eligible to participate in the Plan.

3.                                       Section6.4 is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof:

Notwithstanding the above, effective June 30, 2006, each AffectedEmployee who is actively employed on such date who is not a Rule of 70 Employeewill be 100% vested in his annual retirement benefit under the Plan.  

4.                                   Section6 is hereby amended by adding the following new subsection at the end thereof:

6.6                                 BenefitFreeze for Affected Employees other than Rule of 70 Employees 

Notwithstanding the above, effective July 1, 2006, nofurther benefits shall accrue under Section 6.1, 6.2 or 6.3 of the Plan withregard to any Affected Employee who is not a Rule of 70 Employee.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,INTERMEC, Inc., by its duly authorized representative, has caused thisAmendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf on this 29th day of June,2006.
|   | INTERMEC, INC. |
|--------|----------------|
|   |           |
|   |           |
|   | By             | /s/ Larry D.  Brady |   |
|   |           | Larry D. Brady |
|   |           | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                |  |  |  |

 

----