alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 








---



##### 



AGREEMENT
 Termination Date
 Severance Pay and Transition Pay
  Indemnification
 Liability Insurance




---



##### 



Stock Options
 Letter of Reference
 Health and Dental Insurance/Death Benefit
 Release of Claims for example
 Claims Released




---



##### 



Your Representation and Waiver
 ADEA Release and Waiver
 Consideration for the Release of Claims
 Your Continuing Obligations




---



##### 



Confidentiality




---



##### 



Non-Disparagement
 Non-Disclosure
 Solicitation of Employees and Third Parties
 Representations and Warranties .




---



##### 



Acceptance Procedures .
   c. TWT encourages you to review this document with an attorney prior to signing it.




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
      Very truly yours,
THIRD WAVE TECHNOLOGIESBy:
    /s/ Kevin T. ConroyKevin T. ConroyPresident & Chief Executive Officer  Dated this 31st day of January, 2006.
    /s/ James HerrmannJames Herrmann
#### *In re*GERSTEIN, Marvin Ira

(MR 21662)

Urbana, IL

*690Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Marvin Ira Gerstein is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days. The motion by respondent Marvin Ira Gerstein to extend time for commencement of suspension to November 5, 2007, is allowed. Suspension effective November 5, 2007. Respondent Marvin Ira Gerstein shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Garman, J., took no part.
#### CALABRO v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

June 29, 1922.)

No. 2886.

Criminal law @=>594(3)—Judgment not reversed for denial of continuance, when It does not appear defendant failed to obtain witnesses who would have testified in his favor.

A judgment will not be reversed, for denial of a continuance asked for on the ground of want of time to prepare, where it does not appear that defendant had any witnesses who could not be obtained within the time allowed, or who would have testified in his favor.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Oliver B. Dickinson, Judge.

Albert Calabro was convicted of illegal possession and sale of narcotic drugs, and he brings error.

Affirmed.

Michael A. Spatola, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff in error.

Robert V. Bolger, of Philadelphia, Pa., for the United States.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOEEEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

WOOLEEY, Circuit Judge.

This case is here on the record in Paoni and Smith v. United States, 281 Fed. 801, just decided, and differs from that case in only one circumstance, yet in the vital circumstance that the defendant has failed, to show that he had any witnesses who, had they been summoned, would have testified in his favor, or *273any witnesses who could not, within the time limited by the trial court, be obtained by compulsory process. In other words the defendant, failing to show that he was prejudiced by the action of the trial court, raises on this writ of error an academic rather than a substantial question. Therefore the judgment below must be affirmed.

t§s»For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in .all Key-Numbered Digests *&*Indexes
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                         242,773                 242,773
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,115                   3,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,753                   1,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               252,674                 252,674
<PP&E>                                          21,700                  21,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,696                   8,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,917                 284,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,381                  16,381
<BONDS>                                          2,205                   2,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           256                     256
<OTHER-SE>                                     264,508                 264,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,917                 284,917
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,544                  11,542
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,166                  27,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,625)                 (5,601)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,997)                 (9,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        60                     160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,057)                (10,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,057)                (10,041)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)                  (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)                  (0.41)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$32,000.00                                               VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA


                FOR VALUE RECEIVED, SYNDICATED FOOD SERVICE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
agrees and promises to pay to the order of ROBERT KLEZMER, the principal sum of
Thirty-Two Thousand Dollars ($32,000.00) with interest thereon at the rate of
ten percent (10%) per annum from September 26, 2003, until payment of the Note,
no later than September 26, 2004; the interest being payable as set forth below
in lawful money of the United States of America at Daytona Beach, Florida, or
such other address as the holder from time to time may specify by written notice
to the maker. The principal and interest shall be paid prior to September 26,
2004, or the Note will be in default. The indebtedness evidenced by this Note
may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or premium.

                If there is a default in the payment of the Note pursuant to the
above terms, ROBERT KLEZMER will be entitled to an immediate, ex-parte entry of
a Final Judgment in the amount of $32,000.00 plus 10% interest from September
26, 2003, until the date of Final Judgment which Final Judgment will also accrue
interest at the rate of 10%, including the cost of collection, including all
costs and attorney's fees. This Note is incorporated by reference into an
Agreement and Mutual Release of all claims that is signed in conjunction with
this Promissory Note.

                Each maker and endorser waives presentment, protest, notice of
protest and notice of dishonor and agrees to pay reasonable attorneys fees and
expenses in the enforcement of this Note prior or subsequent to judgment and in
any and all trial and appellate tribunals, whether suit be brought or not, if,
after maturity of this Note or default, counsel shall be employed to collect
this Note.

                DATED this 12th day of November, 2003.



                                              SYNDICATED FOOD SERVICE
                                              INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                              ----------------------------------
                                              By:
                                                 -------------------------------



                                              PETER SCHOENTHALER, ESQUIRE
                                              Attorney for Defendants
07-/3-0003^-^ 

## -Lm oe^Inc 4. fcrfW* -k m PhP-r ; x . Pino i r-f „ ^ ^ 'X- ***'J* ofcdi«: f0it mlf0 j

,fVMiOT-AS:f«MMIMA! APPPJA&

f/ledUn 

### C0^OFCRlM,^AppEALS •peb o.?2:;5 Abel Acosta, Clerk O CQygffrOF CRIMINALAPPEALS
#### Douglas E. CAMPBELL, Petitioner-Appellant v. Warden MAYE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-50955

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 14, 2011.

*383Douglas E. Campbell, Bastrop, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Douglas E. Campbell, federal prisoner # 30685-048, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his conviction and 245-month sentence for conspiring to distribute an unspecified amount methamphetamine.1*See*21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), 846. Campbell argues that the district court erred in determining that he was not entitled to challenge the validity of his conviction and sentence in a § 2241 proceeding because he did not meet the requirements of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

As a general rule, a federal prisoner who seeks to collaterally challenge the legality of his conviction or sentence must file a § 2255 motion. *Padilla v. United States,*416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir.2005). Such claims may be raised in a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of § 2255(e) only if the prisoner shows that the § 2255 remedy is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” § 2255(e). Campbell has not made the requisite showing. *See Reyes-Requena v. United States,*243 F.3d 893, 901-04 (5th Cir.2001). Moreover, to the extent that Campbell alleges that he is actually innocent of being a career offender, this court has held that a claim of actual innocence of a career offender enhancement is not a claim of actual innocence of the crime of conviction and, thus, does not warrant review under § 2241. *Kinder v. Purdy,*222 F.3d 209, 213-14 (5th Cir.2000).

As Campbell is not entitled to raise his claims in a § 2241 petition, his arguments that the district court erred or violated his constitutional rights by failing to address his substantive challenges to his conviction and sentence lack merit. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. Incorporated in Campbell's § 2241 petition was a request for a writ of coram nobis. Because Campbell is still in custody, the district court did not err in denying that relief. *See United States v. Hatten,*167 F.3d 884, 887 n. 6 (5th Cir. 1999).
#### CLARK, Appellant, v. CLARK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by M. Wallace Clark against Eliza W. Clark, individually, and as administratrix.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of BRADLEY, J., at special term. 29 N. Y. Supp. 338.
In support of the USFA mission and 4 strategic goals, the fire administrator’s office established a new International Affairs function. Crisis management, first responder challenges and firefighting as a discipline pull together a global community — one in which the USFA is pleased to engage and proud to have new as well as bolstered relationships.

2022 and 2023 highlighted for the entire world the urgency of supporting one another, building capacity, and working “stronger together.” With global disasters increasing in intensity and frequency and climate-driven impacts and energy transfers on the rise, building an International Affairs arm of the USFA filled a gap.

The USFA senior leaders and staff support international engagements at the NETC for classes, exercises and leadership dialogues. USFA is engaged around the world to share knowledge, hold technology transfers and engage with fire service officials on the global stage.

2023 is the preparatory year for an inaugural World Fire Congress scheduled for early 2024. Hosted by the USFA, this engagement is supported by the DHS and National Security Council. Fire service leaders from around the world will meet for the first time in Washington, D.C., creating a global fire services network. During this event, the participants will sign a commitment charter, dedicating themselves and their nations to supporting the initiative and meeting every 2 years.

In addition to the World Fire Congress, USFA leaders and experts engage broadly with foreign partners in working groups, conferences and visits. The USFA works closely with the Department of State as we identify areas of collaboration with different regions around the world.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Lazare Kaplan International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William H. Moryto, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: August 29, 2008 |   |      |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------|
|                       |   | By:  | /s/  William H. Moryto |
|                  |   |      |  |
|                  |   |      | William H. MorytoVice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel ``Telemedicine''.
    Date: May 8, 2001.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Richard C. Harrison, Chief, Contract Review 
Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 
3158, MSC 9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, 301-435-1437.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel ``Transdermal THC'' and ``Development of Placebo 
Marijuana Cigarettes''.
    Date: May 10, 2001.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Richard C. Harrison, Chief, Contract Review 
Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 
3158, MSC 9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, 301-435-1437.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS).

    Dated: April 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10202 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1

NO. 12-14-00324-CR 

JOSE JULIO SANCHEZ § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appellant § 

§ 

V. § 12th COURT OF APPEALS 

§ 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § 

Appellee § TYLER, TEXAS

COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES Counsel, having file Appellant’s Brief finding no reversible 

errors, requests that he be allowed to withdraw from this appeal, pursuant to Rule 6.5 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for same would show as follows:

I.

Anders/Gainous Brief Filed: 

On or about 06-12-15, Counsel filed Appellant’s Brief and reported to the 

appellate court the absence of reversible error. 

II.

Deadlines & Settings: 

To Counsel’s knowledge, there are no hearings set in this matter and there 

have been no announcements of pending submission dates.

III.

Client’s Address: 

Mr. Sanchez’ last known address is:

Inmate: Jose Julio Sanchez, Cherokee County Jail,

272 Underwood Street Rusk, Texas 75785 

ACCEPTED

12-14-00324-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/9/2015 8:44:19 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/9/2015 8:44:19 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
2

IV.

Letter to Client:

Counsel sent a copy of Appellant’s Brief to Appellant and explained 

Appellant’s rights regarding delivery of the records in the case; his right to object to 

Appellant’s Brief prepared by Counsel; and his right to submit his own Brief to this 

Court.

V.

Requested Relief:

Counsel requests permission to withdraw from the representation of Appellant.

VI.

Conference:

Counsel would show that he conferred with opposing counsel and this Request 

is presented as UNOPPOSED by the State. Since forwarding a copy of the 

Appellant’s Brief to Mr. Sanchez, Counsel has not been contacted by Mr. Sanchez so 

Counsel submitted this Motion as OPPOSED as to Mr. Sanchez.
3

VII.

Certificate of Compliance (TRAP, Rule 9.4 (i)(3)):

Counsel certified that this document was prepared using WORD format and 

the word-count in this documents is 414. 

____________________________

STEN M. LANGSJOEN

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Counsel requests that this 

Motion be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________

STEN M. LANGSJOEN

Attorney for Appellant

P.O. Box 539

Tyler, Texas 75710

Telephone: (903) 531-0171

Telefax: (903) 531-0187

TBA # 11922800
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was delivered by 

certified mail, return receipt requested, and/or by "fax" transmission and/or by 

hand-delivery to District Attorney, Cherokee County, Texas, and was delivered by 

certified mail, return receipt requested, and by regular mail to Inmate Jose Sanchez, 

on this 10th day of July, 2015.

I further I certify that a draft of the foregoing was delivered by certified 

mail, return receipt requested, Inmate Jose Sanchez, on the 24th day of June, 2015.

____________________________

STEN M. LANGSJOEN
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2013

CLAIRE HICKEY; AKIRA KIRKPATRICK; VALERI NATOLI;

CANDACE N. GRAHAM; CARLY SWARTZ; NICHOLAS BOWES,

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Appellants

v.

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

(W .D. Pa. No. 2

- 20

- cv

- 00690 )

_____________

No. 21

- 2016

BROOKE RYAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated;

CHRISTINA FUSCA, on behalf of herself all others similarly situated,

Appellants

v.

TEMPLE UNIVERSITY

Present: HARDIMAN, KRAUSE and MATEY

, Circuit Judge s

Unopposed Joint Motion of Defendants

- Appellees University of Pittsburgh

and Temple University to Amend Precedential Opinion

Respectfully,

Clerk/ ARR

____________________ __ ___________ORDER________________________________

The aforementioned motion is granted, and an amended opinion shall be filed

contemporaneously with this order. As the amendment does not alter the Court’s

judgment, the judgment entered August 11, 2023 will remain as filed.By the Court,

s/ Cheryl Ann Krause

Circuit Judge

Dated: September 6, 2023

ARR/cc: All Counsel of Record
# CI2021080EN.01000301.xml

| 9.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 80/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 80/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2021/C 80 I/03)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 24.12.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 24.12.2020 - 31.12.2020 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/07A. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus Morhua) |
| Zone | 7a |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 39/TQ123 |

Date and time of closure

24.12.2020

Duration

24.12.2020 - 31.12.2020

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/07A.

Species

Cod (Gadus Morhua)

Zone

7a

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

39/TQ123

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---