alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Technology Acquisition
Corporation ("Registrant") for the annual period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I,
John Kinney, chief executive officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   This Report  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The  information  contained  in  this  Report  fairly  represents,  in all
      material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the
      period  covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for
      the period covered by this Report.

/s/ John Kinney
---------------
John Kinney
Chief Executive Officer
June 29, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been provided
to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- How To Appeal 
    - Court Forms  and Fees        - Court Forms
      - Fee Schedule
      - Filing Fee 
    - Court Rules and Procedures        - Rules of Practice  and Procedure
      - Procedural Requirements for Staff Conferences
      - Internal Operating Procedures
      - Rules of Admission  and Practice
      - Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability
      - E-Filing Rules
      - Court Process
      - Court Efforts to Ensure Compliance with Court Rules 
    - Information About Practitioners        - Search List of Practitioners
      - Disciplinary Action
      - Key Points in Finding a Representative
      - Compendium of Disciplinary Grievances 
    - Orders and Opinions        - Miscellaneous Orders
      - Ceremonial Orders
      - Opinions and Full Court Orders
      - Search Decisions and Opinions
      - Recent Decisions / Opinions
      - Case Archives 
    - Active Panel Cases 
    - Stayed Cases 
    - Class Action Cases 
    - Electronic Filing 
    - Docket Search 
    - Oral Arguments        - Schedule
      - Oral Arguments via YouTube Live
      - Audio/Video
      - Oral Argument Educational Outreach 

efiling@uscourts.cavc.gov
efiling@uscourts.cavc.gov
Back

USCAVC 16thJudicial ConferenceSeptember 19-20, 2024

Watch CAVC Oral Arguments on YouTube

Changes to Court Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability - EffectiveJanuary 10, 2024

In the News: Articles

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                      11,244,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,135,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,041,048
<PP&E>                                       2,828,591
<DEPRECIATION>                               (172,105)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,355,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,635,693
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,777
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,126,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,355,107
<SALES>                                      4,932,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,932,971
<CGS>                                        3,266,511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,023,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,141,094
<INCOME-TAX>                                   440,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            700,860
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   700,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES v. SINCLAIR.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 10, 1913.)

No. 2,504.

Execution (§ 275*)—Validity—Notice.

Under Rev. Civ. St. Tex. 1911, art. 3757, which requires a sale of land, under execution order of sale or other process to be advertised for 20 days in a newspaper published in the county where the land is situated, the failure to so advertise the land renders the sale void.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Execution, Cent. Dig. §§ 16, 148, 345, 791-796; Dec. Dig. § 275.*]

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas; Gordon Russell, Judge.

Action at law by the United States against J. T. Sinclair Judgment for defendant, and the United States brings error.

Affirmed.

J. B. Dailey, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Paris, Tex.

*613Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and CALL, District Judge.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

In this case a jury was waived. The cause was tried by the court, which made a special finding of facts. The question raised in this writ is whether the facts as found warrant the judgment rendered.

We do not decide whether or not the homestead of Sinclair was exempt from distraint, the decision of that question being unnecessary, because we conclude • that the fact that the sale was not advertised in a weekly newspaper published in tjhe county for 20 days made the sale void.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
EX-10.14





 Exhibit 10.14 
 



 
  

			
	TO:	  	LANCE MITCHELL
		
	FROM:	  	STEVE ESTES
		
	DATE:	  	JULY 8, 2019
		
	SUBJECT:	  	PLANNED ISSUANCE OF RESTRICTED STOCK

  
  

As we have discussed, a critical component of our ongoing business strategy for Reynolds Consumer Products LLC will be to explore opportunities for the
business that could lead to an Initial Public Offering (IPO) of the business or potentially a divestiture of the associated business entities. Your assistance is needed by Reynolds as we work through this process to help prepare the business for a
successful transaction. 
 If the IPO is successful, the company whose shares are registered in the IPO will issue you Restricted Stock at the completion of
the IPO. The number of shares in this grant equals $1,550,000 divided by the IPO price as of the date of the grant, rounded to the nearest whole share. Vesting for the restricted stock will occur over a 3-year
period with 1/3 vesting after 12-months from the successful IPO; 1/3 vesting after 24-months from the successful IPO; and, 1/3 vesting after 36-months from the successful IPO. You must be an employee of the Company or one of its affiliates on the applicable vesting date to receive such shares. 

Should there be a business sale instead of an IPO, you will receive $1,550,000 in cash in lieu of Restricted Stock. For purposes hereof, a business sale means
a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or a sale of more than 50% of the equity of the Company or such entity. This cash payment will be made in the following manner: 

1⁄2 Payable
30-days post-closing of the sale 
 1⁄2 Payable 180-days post-closing of the sale 
 This memo does not change your
status as an “at-will” employee and does not guarantee your employment for any specific period of time. The Company reserves the right to terminate you at any time and for any or no reason. Any
Restricted Stock issued or cash payment made pursuant to this memo shall be subject to regular tax withholdings and other authorized deductions and will not be treated as compensation for any purpose under any benefit plans or programs, unless
statutorily required. 
 This memo is provided to summarize the agreement that has been reached in this regard between the Company and the employee. Should
an IPO be completed, a formal grant letter for the Restricted Stock will be provided to the employee that documents all terms and conditions related to the grant. 

//s// Steve Estes
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6428 

To exclude from gross income compensation provided by Pacific Gas and 

Electric Company for victims of the natural gas transmission line explosion occurring in San Bruno, California, and to treat as nontaxable 

any gain from the involuntary conversion of their property as the result 

of such explosion, without regard to the rules requiring conversion to 

property of a similar use. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2010 

Ms. SPEIER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To exclude from gross income compensation provided by Pacific Gas and Electric Company for victims of the natural 

gas transmission line explosion occurring in San Bruno, 

California, and to treat as nontaxable any gain from 

the involuntary conversion of their property as the result 

of such explosion, without regard to the rules requiring 

conversion to property of a similar use. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6428 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Bruno Victims 

3 Compensation Fairness Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION LINE EXPLOSION 

5 COMPENSATION EXCLUDED FROM GROSS IN6 COME. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986— 

9 (1) the natural gas transmission line explosion 

10 on September 9, 2010, in San Bruno, California, 

11 shall be treated as a qualified disaster under section 

12 139(c) of such Code, and 

13 (2) any compensation provided by Pacific Gas 

14 and Electric Company to a victim of such disaster 

15 shall be treated as a qualified disaster relief pay16 ment under section 139 of such Code. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply to 

18 amounts received on or after September 9, 2010. 

19 SEC. 3. GAIN FROM CONVERSION OF PROPERTY EXCLUDED 

20 FROM GROSS INCOME. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any gain from the 

22 compulsory or involuntary conversion of property as the 

23 result of its destruction, in whole or in part, by the natural 

24 gas explosion described in section 1(1)— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6428 IH

1 (1) section 1033 of the Internal Revenue Code 

2 of 1986 shall not apply with respect to such gain, 

3 and 

4 (2) such gain shall not be included in gross in5 come for purposes of such Code. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply to 

7 compulsory or involuntary conversions on or after Sep8 tember 9, 2010. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lihong
      Guo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      March 31, 2008





/s/Lihong GuoLihong Guo, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report ofSouth Shore Resources Inc.(the "Company")on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year endedDecember 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Michael Kabin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |   

Dated this 15thday of April, 2008.

MICHAEL KABINMichael KabinChief Executive Officer























---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<NAME> SURREY INC
<CIK> 0001044847
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                   69
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                             45
<INVENTORY>                                           1,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      3,502
<PP&E>                                                2,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        5,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3,974
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                              (39)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          5,210
<SALES>                                               6,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      6,363
<CGS>                                                 4,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         (4)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         348
<INCOME-TAX>                                            135
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     213
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                            213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.10
        


</TABLE>
#### RAMSAY et al., Respondents, v. KEYSTONE GAS CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by George E. Ramsay and others against the Keystone Gas Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
              ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE, INC. 1997 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



     This SECOND AMENDMENT (this  "Amendment") to the Electric  Lightwave,  Inc.
          1997 Equity  Incentive Plan, as amended,  (the "Plan") is made on this
          20th day of March, 2000 by Electric Lightwave, Inc. (the "Company"), a
          corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of
          Delaware.

     WHEREAS, the Company has  determined  that it is in its best  interests  to
          clarify the Plan as set forth herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE,  upon approval of this Amendment by the Board of Directors,
          the Plan shall be amended as follows:

     1.   The first  sentence of Section 3,  paragraph  (a) of the Plan shall be
          deleted, and replaced by the following two sentences:

          Subject to  adjustment  as  provided  in Section 14 hereof,  6,670,600
          shares of Stock are hereby   reserved for issuance  pursuant to Awards
          under the Plan.  Awards of phantom shares, or share units that, by the
          terms of such Awards,  are payable solely in cash shall not be subject
          to such limit, provided, however, that such Awards shall be subject to
          a separate  limit such that the value of all such Awards granted under
          the Plan shall be  determined  by reference to no more than  6,500,000
          shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock.

     2.   Section 10, paragraph (d) shall be amended by adding the following new
          sentence to the end thereof:

          No  Participant  awarded  phantom shares or share units shall have any
          right as a stockholder  with respect to any shares whose value is used
          to  determine  the  value  of such  phantom  shares  or  share  units;
          provided,  however, that this sentence shall not preclude any Award of
          phantom  shares or share  units  from  providing  dividend  equivalent
          rights  or  payouts  to the  Participant  in the form of shares of the
          Company's   Common  Stock  (and  the   Participant   shall  have  full
          stockholder rights with respect to any such paid out shares).

     IN   WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed
          on the day and year first above written.

                    ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE, INC.




                    By:       /s/   Rudy J. Graf
                              ______________________________
                    Name:     Rudy J. Graf
                    Title:    President - Citizens Utilities Company
                              Chief Executive Officer - Electric Lightwave, Inc.
Exhibit 10.1
    

    
      Named Executive Officers Long-Term
      Equity Incentive Fiscal Year 2011 Awards
    

    

    

    

    

    
    	

        	
          Restricted Stock*
        	
           
        	
          Restricted Stock*
        
	
          
            Executive Officer
          

        	
          
            (Performance-Based Vesting) (#)
          

        	

        	
          
            (Time-Based Vesting) (#)
          

        
	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	
          Charles H. Turner
        	

        	

        	

        
	
          Executive Vice President,
        	

        	

        	

        
	
          Chief Financial Officer
        	
          24,000
        	

        	
          42,000
        
	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	
          Gregory S. Humenesky
        	

        	

        	

        
	
          Executive Vice President,
        	

        	

        	

        
	
          Human Resources
        	
          12,500
        	

        	
          12,500
        
	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	
          Sharon M. Leite
        	

        	

        	

        
	
          Executive Vice President,
        	

        	

        	

        
	
          Stores
        	
          15,500
        	

        	
          15,500
        


    

    

    

    
      *All equity awards were granted under the
      Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, Restated as Amended
      through March 25, 2008.  The grants were effective April 9, 2010.
# C_2021254EN.01000201.xml

| 29.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10297 — CDPQ/OTPP/Ohio)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 254/02)

On 18 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10297. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10297. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---