alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
China Packaging Technologies, Inc. - Exhibit 10.5 - Filed by
   newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.5 

Form of Sales Contract 

(English Summary) 

Party A: Great Shengda as supplier 

Party B: Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co., Ltd. as purchaser 

	Guarantee 	1. 	
      When the contract is signed, Great Shengda will pay
      Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co., Ltd. RMB100,000 as deposit. Hangzhou Wahaha
      Group Co., Ltd. will return the deposit to Great Shengda at the end of the
      contract period if Great Shengda perform the contract well. 

		2. 	
      During the period of the contract, Great Shengda should
      abide by the terms and should not refuse to provide products or provide
      non-conforming products or terminate the contract unilaterally. If any of
      the above happens, Hangzhou Wahaha has the right to deduct from the
      deposit and Great Shengda shall be responsible for Hangzhou Wahaha’s
      losses. 




	Standard of Inspection 	
                         Provided
      by Hangzhou Wahaha, the Standard of Inspection of Q/WH0436, Q/WH0449.
      Q/WH0459. Q/WH0466, Q/WH0468, Q/WH0469, Q/WHJ0512. Q/WHJ0518, Q/WHJ0530.
      Q/WHJ0542, Q/WH0543, Q/WHJ0566, Q/WH0567. 

	  	
      

	Resolution of Quality 
Problem 	
                         The
      supplier should provide cartons under the Standard of Inspection and the
      Contract. The purchaser has the right to destroy non-conforming products
      and the supplier should bear all the costs and expenses. 

	  	
      

	Transportation 	
                         By
      vehicle 

	  	
      

	Standards of check and 
acceptance 	
                         According
      to the Standard of Inspection and the Contract, The supplier has the right
      to reject non-conforming products or ask the supplier to replace the
      products for free. 

	  	
      

	Payment 	
                         After
      inspection and acceptance of the goods, and provided form of inspection
      and VAT invoice, the purchaser will make payment, in 30 working days. The
      supplier should give legal, true and available VAT invoice or the supplier
      will bear all costs. 

	  	
      

	Governing Law 	
                         China’s
      Contract Law 

	  	
      

	Dispute Resolution 	
                         the
      purchaser’s local court
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 03-16

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired judges of the Court may be recalled by

the Chief Judge when furtherservice is needed by the Court. Retired Judge Donald L. Ivers, having

complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired judge. The Chief Judge of

the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Ivers would provide substantial service necessary

to meet the needs of the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective February 9, 2016, Judge Donald L. Ivers is recalled from retired

status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). When in service, Judge Ivers shall have and

exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active service. Judge Ivers

shall perform substantial service for the Court in this calendar year as requested by the Chief Judge. 

He shall serve for a period of time not to exceed 90 days or its equivalent, or for less time should the

Chief Judge determine that his service is no longer needed . Only with his consent may Judge Ivers'

service be extended this calendar year. 

DATED: February 9, 2016 BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence B. Hagel

LAWRENCE B. HAGEL

Chief Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Military Traffic Management Command, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Military Traffic Management Command (MTMC), as the Program Director for the Department of Defense (DoD), has reviewed comments received in response to the                         **Federal Register**                         Notice of December 18, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 243) page 79084. We appreciate the comments of those responding and weighed them in our decision process. MTMC will reconsider expanding the role of brokers to allow their participation in DoD's Personal Property Program when proposal's within the Task Force Fix are implemented.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Sylvia Walker, Headquarters, Military Traffic Management Command, Attn: MTPP-HQ, Room 10N67-51, Hoffman Building II, 200 Stovall Street, Alexandria, VA 22332-5000; Telephone (703) 428-2982, Telefax (703) 428-3388.

Luz D. Ortiz,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-10014 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22

- 0634 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMES MONTGOMERY,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2023

07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0634
#### SHAMPAGNE, Respondent, v. BURK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Wilbert Shampagne against Patrick Burk.

No opinion. Judgment of the county court of Monroe county appealed from affirmed,, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 1,995,202
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            297,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                              24,054
<INVENTORY>                                            4,730,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       7,152,918
<PP&E>                                                 6,254,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (2,427,920)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        12,852,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  2,675,254
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                2,143
<COMMON>                                                  40,657
<OTHER-SE>                                             8,664,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          12,852,079
<SALES>                                                  334,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         659,276
<CGS>                                                    345,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            345,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       3,263,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (2,531,208)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (2,531,208)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (2,531,208)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00195-CV

IN THE MATTER OF C.F. §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-117087-21)

September 29, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-44209; File No. 265-22]

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Market Information. 

# SUMMARY:

The fifth meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Market Information (“Committee”) will be held on May 14, 2001, in the William O. Douglas Room, at the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC, beginning at 9 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public, and the public is invited to submit written comments to the Committee.

# ADDRESSES:

Written comments should be submitted in triplicate and should refer to File No. 265-22. Comments should be submitted to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anitra Cassas, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, at 202-942-0089; Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-1001.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10a, and the regulations thereunder, the Designated Federal Official of the Committee, David S. Shillman, has ordered publication of this notice that the Committee will conduct a meeting on May 14, 2001, in the William O. Douglas Room at the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC beginning at 9 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public. This will be the fifth meeting of the Committee. The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss alternative models for the provision of market data, and other issues relating to the public availability of market information in the equities and options markets.

Dated: April 20, 2001.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10387 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley J. Dodson, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Oil States International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









| |  |  |                           | 
| |  |  | ------------------------- | 
| |  |  | /s/ Bradley J. Dodson     | 
| |  |  | Name:  Bradley J. Dodson  | 
| |  |  | Date:    October 31, 2013 |
(86 South. 375)

#### SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. TAYLOR.

(7 Div. 97.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama,

Oct. 14, 1920.)

Railroads <&wkey;446(IO) — Negligent lookout for animal held question for jury.

Enginemen’s negligence in not having seen cow in time to avoid injury by fast train *held*question for jury.

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Clair County ; W. J. Martin, Judge.

Action by Buel Taylor against the Southern Railway Company, for damages for killing a cow. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Transferred from Court of Appeals under section 6, p. 460, Acts 1911.

Affirmed.

Knox, Acker, Dixon & Stern, of Anniston, for appellant.

Counsel discuss the errors assigned, but without citation of authority.

M. M. Smith, of Pell City, for appellee.

No brief reached the reporter.

McCLELLAN, j.

The plaintiff, appellee, recovered judgment against the defendant, appellant, for the negligent killing by defend*530ant’s passenger train of a cow alleged to liave been owned by the plaintiff. The determination of the issue of ownership vel non by the plaintiff was properly submitted to the jury. The other issue, viz. whether the employees of the defendant were negligent in the premises, was, under the whole evidence, a question for the jury, the solution of which depended almost entirely upon the credibility to be accorded by the jury to the testimony of the enginemen, on the one side, and to that o'f witnesses for the plaintiff, whose evidence tended to show that the animal could have been seen a much greater distance, though it was in a deep, narrow cut, than the engine-men (who testified that a lookout was being maintained as the train approached the place where the animal was stricken) declared was the distance at which the animal could be or was discernible from the rapidly .moving engine. It was for the jury to decide whether the engineman’s view, from bright sunlight into the shaded area of the narrow cut, was rendered ineffectual until his train had reached a point so near the animal that ,the exercise of the requisite skill and diligence could have averted the injury.

The court did not err in its rulings on the evidence. The state of feeling existing between the plaintiff and his daughter, because of her -marriage against his will, could not have had any bearing upon the issue of ownership of the animal by plaintiff or by his daughter. We cannot say that the court below erred in overruling the motion for new trial. Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630, 9 South. 738.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS. JJ., concur.

¡&wkey;For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Active Power, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph F. Pinkerton, III, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    Joseph F. Pinkerton, IIIJoseph F. Pinkerton, III Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer November 11, 2002
Exhibit 15.1



                LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION




November 13, 2003





Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc.
1000 Kiewit Plaza
Omaha, Nebraska 68131

Re:  Registration Statement No. 333-107629

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 13, 2003 related to
our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report
is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by
an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.





                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
EXHIBIT 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") I, Gary H. Schlatter, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                         /s/ Gary H. Schlatter
                         ----------------------------
                         Gary H. Schlatter, President


DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Gary H.
Schlatter, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gary H. Schlatter
----------------------------
Gary H. Schlatter, President



DATED NOVEMBER 21, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 74 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,455]


McCain Foods, Burley, ID; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 7, 2000, in response to a petition filed on the 
same date on behalf of workers at McCain Foods, Burley, Idaho.
    The company official submitting the petition has requested that the 
petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case 
would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C., this 4th day of April, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-9522 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clifford Wildes, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 14, 2005                             /S/ CLIFFORD WILDES
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Clifford Wildes,
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                       72