alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6494 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2010 

Received 

DECEMBER 22, 2010 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 to improve the Littoral Combat Ship program 

of the Navy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6494 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP PROGRAM. 

2 (a) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of sec3 tion 121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

4 Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2211) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘ten Littoral Combat Ships 

8 and 15 Littoral Combat Ship ship control and 

9 weapon systems’’ and inserting ‘‘20 Littoral 

10 Combat Ships, including any ship control and 

11 weapon systems the Secretary determines nec12 essary for such ships,’’; and 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘a contract’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘one or more contracts’’; and 

15 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘liability to’’ 

16 and inserting ‘‘liability of’’. 

17 (b) TECHNICAL DATA PACKAGE.—Subsection 

18 (b)(2)(A) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘a second 

19 shipyard, as soon as practicable’’ and inserting ‘‘another 

20 shipyard to build a design specification for that Littoral 

21 Combat Ship’’. 

22 (c) LIMITATION OF COSTS.—Subsection (c)(1) of 

23 such section is amended by striking ‘‘awarded to a conVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Dec 23, 2010 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6494.RFS H6494

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6494 RFS

1 tractor selected as part of a procurement’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘under a contract’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 15, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Leada Tak Tai Li, the
Chief Financial Officer of CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC. (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this statement this 15th day of
November, 2010.




/s/ 
      Leada
      Tak Tai LiLeada
      Tak Tai Li
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Myron K. Dixon, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
##### In this section

              - Codes and standards (5)
              - CRR (10)
              - Events (4)
              - Leadership (8)
              - Wildfire and WUI (16)
              - Planning (11)
              - Data (8)
              - EMS (16)
              - Equipment and technology (17)
              - Fire investigation (6)
              - Funding (5)
              - Hazmat (14)
              - Health and safety (38)
              - Terrorism (4)
              - Training (6)

Infogram

- Health and safety
- Planning
- Terrorism
Protecting houses of worship from targeted violence

Infogram

- Data
- Equipment and technology
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Planning
- Terrorism
First responders need real-time hazmat information at rail incidents

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
America Burning: 50 years of fire safety and prevention

Current Issues

- Codes and standards
- CRR
- Data
- EMS
- Equipment and technology
- Events
- Fire investigation
- Funding
- Hazmat
- Health and safety
- Leadership
- Planning
- Terrorism
- Training
- Wildfire and WUI
EMR - ISAC: Making vital, timely, actionable emergency services sector information easily accessible
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

# Time and Date: 

Approximately 4 p.m., Wednesday, May 2, 2001, following a recess at the conclusion of the open meeting.

# Place: 

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments,  and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Michelle A. Smith, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204.

# Supplementary Information: 

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at ­http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.

Dated: April 25, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-10754 Filed 4-25-01; 4:57 pm]

BILLING  CODE 6210-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Abram HARRIS, Appellant.

No. 11-1914.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 2, 2011.

Filed: Sept. 19, 2011.

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Abram Harris pleaded guilty to possessing marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). At sentencing, the district court1 declined a defense request for probation and imposed a sentence of 42 months in prison, within the undisputed advisory Guidelines range. On appeal, Harris’s counsel has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), seeking to withdraw and arguing that the sentence was unreasonable, and that probation would have been more appropriate.

We conclude, though, that Harris has not rebutted the presumption that his within-Guidelines-range prison sentence was substantively reasonable. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (if sentence is within Guidelines range, appellate court may apply presumption of reasonableness). We further conclude the district court committed no procedural error at sentencing and did not impose an unreasonable sentence. *See id.*(outlining steps in appellate review); *United States v. Feemster,*572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc) (describing procedural error).

Having reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, we grant leave to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment.

1

. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6267 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6267

 To require Federal agencies to begin acquiring all telecommunications 
     services under the Networx contracts of the General Services 
              Administration not later than May 31, 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

  Mr. Towns (for himself and Mr. Issa) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require Federal agencies to begin acquiring all telecommunications 
     services under the Networx contracts of the General Services 
              Administration not later than May 31, 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Complete the Networx 
Telecommunications Transition Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES TO TRANSFER TELECOMMUNICATIONS 
              SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--To the maximum extent practicable, Federal 
agencies and other Federal entities concerned shall begin acquiring all 
telecommunications services under the Networx contracts of the General 
Services Administration not later than May 31, 2011.
    (b) Limitation Relating to Future Contracts.--To the maximum extent 
practicable, the Administrator of General Services may not accept any 
offer for an FTS2001 bridge or crossover contract after the date of the 
enactment of this Act unless the goods or services to be provided under 
such contract are at a price that is equal to or less than the price of 
comparable goods or services under the Networx contracts of the General 
Services Administration.
    (c) Definition.--In this Act, the term ``Federal agencies and other 
Federal entities concerned'' means Federal agencies and entities that 
are acquiring telecommunications services under the General Services 
Administration FTS2001 bridge and crossover contracts as in effect on 
September 29, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.5





                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         The undersigned, a director of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., hereby
constitutes and appoints Stephen J. Tomassi and Gregory D. Waller, or either of
them, his true and lawful attorneys and agents, each with full power and
authority to act as such without the other, to do any and all acts and things
and to execute any and all instruments which either one of said attorneys and
agents may deem necessary or advisable to enable said Corporation to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), as amended; and including
specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, full power and authority
to each of said attorneys and agents to sign the name of the undersigned to the
Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, and any
amendment(s) thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to the requirements of the Act, the undersigned hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and delivered these
presents as of the 8th day of December 2000.





                                                         /s/ William E. B. Siart
                                                         -----------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6155

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RANDELL BRICE HARRIS, a/k/a Randall Brice Harris, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-12-P) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randell Brice Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harris , No. CR-94-12-P (W.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Election Commission [Notice 2001-4]
 AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
 ACTION: Notice of filing dates for special election.
 SUMMARY: Virginia has scheduled a special election on June 19, 2001, to fill the U.S. House of Representatives seat in the Fourth Congressional District held by the late Congressman Norman Sisisky. Committees participating in the Virginia special election are required to file pre- and post-election reports.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gregory J. Scott, Information Division, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463; Telephone: (202) 694-1100; Toll Free (800) 424-9530.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All principal campaign committees of candidates who participate in the Virginia Special General and all other political committees that support candidates in the Special General shall file a 12-day Pre-General Report on June 7, 2001, with coverage dates from the close of the last report filed, or the day of the committee's first activity, whichever is later, through May 30, 2001; and a consolidated 30-day Post-General and Mid-Year Report on July 19, 2001, with coverage dates from May 31 through July 9, 2001. Committees filing monthly that support candidates in the Virginia Special General should continue to file according to the non-election year monthly reporting schedule. 
                    ( print page 21384) Calendar of Reporting Dates for Virginia Special Election
[Committees involved in the special general (06/19/01) must file]
Report
Close of books1
Reg./cert. mailing date2
Filing datePre-General
05/30/01
06/04/01
06/07/01Post-General & Mid-Year 3
07/09/01
07/19/01
07/19/011
                         The period begins with the close of books of the last report filed by the committee. If the committee has filed no previous reports, the period begins with the date of the committee's first activity.2
                         Reports sent registered or certified mail must be postmarked by the mailing date; otherwise, they must be received by the filing date.3
                         Committees should file a consolidated Post-General and Mid-Year Report by the filing date of the Post-General Report.
 Dated: April 24, 2001. David M. Mason, Vice-Chairman, Federal Election Commission.


[FR Doc. 01-10575 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### HICKMAN, Respondent, v. PURVIANCE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by Arthur W. Hickman against Louis K. Purviance.

No opinion. Order appealed from reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and judgment vacated.
H. R. 6387 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 337 West 

Clark Street in Eureka, California, as the ‘‘Sam Sacco Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SAM SACCO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 337 West Clark Street in Eureka, California, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sam Sacco Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sam Sacco Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CUXUM

- ALVARADO,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 20

- 73809 Agency No. A201

- 030

- 311

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of an

Immigration Judge Submitted July 29, 2022 * * Pasadena, California Before: PAEZ and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, ** * District Judge.
Julio Cuxum

- Alvarado, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a decision of an immigration judge (IJ) upholding an asylum officer’s negative reasonable fear determination. We deny the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. 

# FIL ED

AUG 8 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALSPage 2 of 3

1. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that the harm
Cuxum

- Alvarado feared was not related to a protected ground

. A petitioner in a reasonable fear proceeding must show a “reasonable possibility” that he will be persecuted in the country of removal on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social gro up, or political opinion. 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3); 8 C.F.R. § 208.31(c). During his reasonable fear interview, Cuxum

- Alvarado expressed a fear of harm inflicted by his step

- nephew in retaliation for Cuxum

- Alvarado ’s inquir y into the step

- nephew’s potential role in the murder of Cuxum

- Alvarado’s brothe r
. Before the IJ, Cuxum

- Alvarado indicated that the step

- nephew had threatened to “exact revenge” on him . Fear of future harm arising out of a purely personal dispute, without more, is not persecution on the basis of a protected ground.
Molina

- Morales v. INS , 237 F.3d 104 8, 1051

– 52 (9th Cir. 2001). W e lack jurisdiction to consider C uxum - A lvarado’s proposed particular social group of
“Guatemalan small business owners” b ecause he failed to raise it before the

agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677 (9th Cir. 2004 ).
2. Cuxum

- Alvarado has not challenge d the IJ’s denial of his claim under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Any challenge to the merits of the IJ’s CAT ruling is thus waived. Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

– 80 (9th Cir. 2013).Page 3 of 3

3
. Cuxum

- Alvarado asserts for the first time before us that his interview
with the asylum officer w as hampered by “miscommunication due to telephonic and shoddy connections between petitioner, officer and interpreter.” Cuxum

Alvarado has not demonstrated error during the course of the interview or prejudice stemming from any alleged error, and thus he ha s not satisfied either of the required prongs of a due process claim

. See Vilchez v. Holder , 682 F.3d 1195, 1199 (9th Cir. 2012).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES, LTD.
                      EXHIBIT 27 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   yEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1995
<CASH>                                         89,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               354,000
<PP&E>                                         10,004,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,644,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,845,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          339,000
<BONDS>                                        16,351,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,845,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,845,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          4,235,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,590,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,520,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,125,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 1,125,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,125,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  55.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  55.70
        


</TABLE>