alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6411 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6411

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 1, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the approval of the Agreement Between the Government of 
the United States of America and the Government of Australia Concerning 
                    Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED 
              STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA 
              CONCERNING PEACEFUL USES OF NUCLEAR ENERGY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the provisions for congressional 
consideration of a proposed agreement for cooperation in subsection d. 
of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the 
Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and 
the Government of Australia Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, 
done at New York, May 4, 2010, may become effective on or after October 
8, 2010, as if all the requirements in such section 123 for 
consideration of such agreement had been satisfied, subject to 
subsection (b) of this section.
    (b) Applicability of Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Other Provisions 
of Law.--Upon coming into effect, the agreement referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy 
Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other applicable United 
States law as if such agreement had come into effect in accordance with 
the requirements of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001044847
<NAME> SURREY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (24)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,106
<PP&E>                                           3,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,549)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              868
<BONDS>                                          1,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,098
<OTHER-SE>                                          32
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,265
<SALES>                                          1,902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,902
<CGS>                                            1,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    11
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (14)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (9)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (9)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas Jones et al., Appellants, v Putnam Hospital Center et al., Defendants, and Melvin Bloom, Respondent.

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Dickinson, J.), entered May 15, 1986, as denied their motion for modification of a prior order of the same court which had directed them to provide a further response to the demand of the defendant Bloom for information regarding their expert witness pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1).

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the provision which directed a further response as to the expert’s qualifications; as so modified the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree that the request for further information as to the expert’s qualifications was palpably improper since it would effectively lead to disclosure of the expert’s identity which is *448not required in a medical malpractice action under the statute (CPLR 3101 [d] [1]; *Renucci v Mercy Hosp.,*124 AD2d 796). Otherwise, we find no abuse of discretion in the court’s direction for a further response as to the substance of the facts and opinions and the basis for the expert’s opinions (CPLR 3101 [d] [1]). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6048 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to ensure that certain tenants are able to return to affordable 

housing after a major disaster. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2010 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to ensure that certain tenants are 

able to return to affordable housing after a major disaster. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ASSISTANCE FOR LANDLORDS OF LOW- TO 

4 MODERATE-INCOME TENANTS. 

5 Section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

6 and Emergency Assistance Act is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(1)— 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6048 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub2 paragraph (A); 

3 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

4 subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) subject to paragraph (5), to a person 

7 who owns or operates rental dwelling units de8 scribed in such paragraph, made available for 

9 occupancy only by low- or moderate-income ten10 ants as defined by the Administrator, damaged 

11 or destroyed by a major disaster for the repair, 

12 restoration, reconstruction, or replacement of 

13 the dwelling units.’’; 

14 (2) at the end of subsection (a), by adding the 

15 following: 

16 ‘‘(5) CONDITIONS FOR ASSISTANCE TO OWNERS

17 OR OPERATORS OF CERTAIN DWELLING UNITS.—The 

18 President may make contributions to a person who 

19 owns or operates rental dwelling units if— 

20 ‘‘(A) before the disaster the units were 

21 made available for occupancy only by low- or 

22 moderate-income tenants as determined by the 

23 Administrator; 

24 ‘‘(B) the owner or operator will continue 

25 for a minimum period of time determined by 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6048 IH

1 the Administrator to make available rental 

2 dwelling units for occupancy only by low- or 

3 moderate-income tenants; and 

4 ‘‘(C) the owner or operator has applied for 

5 a disaster loan under section 7(b) of the Small 

6 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)) and has been 

7 determined to be ineligible for such a loan or 

8 has obtained such a loan in the maximum 

9 amount for which the Small Business Adminis10 tration determines the owner or operator is eli11 gible.’’; 

12 (3) in subsection (b)(2) by inserting ‘‘, dwelling 

13 unit,’’ after ‘‘public facility,’’; 

14 (4) in subsection (d)(1) by striking ‘‘or’’ and in15 serting ‘‘, dwelling units, or a’’; and 

16 (5) in subsection (e)(1)(A) by inserting ‘‘, 

17 dwelling unit,’’ after ‘‘public facility’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, David E. Fountain, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Not Applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Dated: November 7, 2006 /s/ David E. Fountain   David E. Fountain   Chief Financial Officer
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Enclaves  Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Daniel G. Hayes, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

   Dated:  November 16, 2006                      /s/ Daniel G. Hayes
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                      Daniel G. Hayes
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
- Home
- Media Center
- Yearly Press Archive

# 2008  Press Releases

### 9th Annual Birney Elementary Holiday Party

December 11, 2008

### Tree Dedication Honoring U.S. Capitol Police

September 18, 2008

### Man Arrested With Rifle, Ammunition, Grenade on Capitol Hill

September 5, 2008

### "A Capitol Fourth" Concert – July 4, 2008

July 2, 2008

### Off Duty U.S. Capitol Police Officer Struck By Vehicle

June 22, 2008

### U.S. Capitol Police Officer Named Officer of the Year by The National Exchange Club

June 17, 2008

### National Memorial Day Events at the U.S. Capitol

May 21, 2008

### 27th Annual National Peace Officers Memorial Service

May 13, 2008

### Appointments of Inspector Yancey H. Garner, Jr. as Deputy Chief and Inspector Matthew R. Verderosa as Deputy Chief

March 19, 2008

### State of the Union Address

January 25, 2008

-               Current page            1
-               Page            2
- Next page››
- Last pageLast »

## Media Center

              - Press Releases
              - USCP Arrests
              - USCP FAST FACTS

## Yearly Archive

                  - 2024               (4)          
                  - 2023               (26)          
                  - 2022               (36)          
                  - 2021               (73)          
                  - 2020               (9)          
                  - 2019               (15)          
                  - 2018               (14)          
                  - 2017               (28)          
                  - 2016               (18)          
                  - 2015               (10)          
                  - 2014               (14)          
                  - 2013               (10)          
                  - 2012               (10)          
                  - 2011               (13)          
                  - 2010               (10)          
                  - 2009               (18)          
                  - 2008               (11)          
                  - 2007               (14)          
                  - 2006               (23)          
                  - 2005               (18)          
                  - 2004               (24)          
                  - 2003               (15)
USCIRF Opening Remarks, Religious Freedom in Southeast Asia 1

U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Hearing

Religious Freedom in Southeast Asia: Techno-Authoritarianism and 

Transnational Influences

Opening Remarks as prepared for delivery

Abraham Cooper, USCIRF Chair

Good afternoon and welcome to the U.S. Commission on International Religious 

Freedom’s hearing on Religious Freedom in Southeast Asia: TechnoAuthoritarianism and Transnational Influences. Thank you very much to our 

distinguished witnesses for joining us today to offer their insight on this important 

topic.

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, or USCIRF, is an 

independent, bipartisan U.S. government advisory body created by the 1998 

International Religious Freedom Act, or IRFA. The Commission uses international 

standards to monitor freedom of religion or belief abroad and makes policy 
USCIRF Opening Remarks, Religious Freedom in Southeast Asia 2

recommendations to the U.S. government. Today, USCIRF exercises its statutory 

authority under IRFA to convene this virtual hearing.

In today’s hearing, we will look at how emerging trends in technology and 

influences from outside the region are impacting religious freedom in member 

states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN. We will also 

consider how the U.S government can more effectively combat repressive 

transnational influence that seeks to destroy religious freedom and other related 

human rights.

Despite growing civil society activism and economic development, religious 

freedom conditions throughout Southeast Asia continue to stagnate or, in many 

places, decline. The rise of technology and digital surveillance, alongside other 

transnational influences from outside the region, place religious freedom under 

increasing threat. The Burmese military disseminates hate speech and calls for 

widespread violence through social media to perpetrate atrocities against the 

predominantly Muslim Rohingya. In Indonesia, blasphemy charges increasingly 

cite social media as the source of the offending incident. Across Southeast Asia, 

transnational influences, particularly from China and Saudi Arabia, threaten to 

change the political and legal landscape with major consequences for religious 

freedom and related human rights.

In last year’s Annual Report USCIRF recommended that the U.S. Department of 

State designate Burma and Vietnam as Countries of Particular Concern, or CPCs, 

for engaging in systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom. 

We also recommended that Indonesia and Malaysia be placed on the State 

Department’s Special Watch List for engaging in or tolerating severe violations of 

religious freedom. The State Department has designated Burma as a CPC and 

placed Vietnam on the Special Watch List but has not taken similar action on 

Indonesia or Malaysia.

I will now hand it over to my colleague, Vice Chair Fred Davie, for his opening 

remarks.
#### In the Matter of John Kostick, Appellant, v Vincent Del Castillo et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to prohibit the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter Transit Authority) from conducting a hearing regarding disciplinary charges filed against the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 7, 1987, which, upon the respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the proceeding due to the petitioner’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies requires that one first exhaust all available administrative channels before looking to the courts for relief *(see, McKart v United States,*395 US 185; *Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth.,*46 NY2d 52; *Steinberg v Sea Gate Assn.,*118 AD2d 558). While it is true that the exhaustion rule is not an inflexible one *(see, Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., supra),*in the instant case, the petitioner has not established that the disciplinary procedures invoked were beyond the Transit Authority’s grant of power or that resort to an administrative remedy would be futile or that its pursuit would cause irreparable injury. Accordingly, we conclude that the petitioner must first complete the disciplinary hearing before he can challenge the procedures in court. Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Emile J. Jordan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ EMILE J. JORDAN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        EMILE J. JORDAN, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


DATED DECEMBER 19, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In Matter of Elizabeth Stevenson.

Where a portion of money arising from the sale of lands, in which the widow has a right of dower, is put out by commissioners on bond, according jo the statute, *Revised Laws*599, *see.*8, the bond should he taken in the name of the commissioners, and not of the widow.

*Armstrong*applied to the court to know in whose name the bond, which was to be taken to secure the widow’s share of property which had been sold under the statute, *Revised Laws,*599, *see.*8, should be taken.

Oil. Justice

said that the bond must be made to the commissioners, and not to the widow herself.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.02



                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     I, Theresa D. Becks, the Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as managing operator of The Campbell Fund Trust, certify that (i) the Form
10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of The Campbell Fund Trust fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Campbell Fund Trust.


                                 THE CAMPBELL FUND TRUST
                                 By: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing operator


                                 By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Theresa D. Becks
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     December 24, 2003

                                      E 7
#### In the Matter of Charles Maynard et al., Appellants, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, et al., Respondents.

Appeal by the petitioners from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 2, 1986.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Edelstein at Special Term. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.