alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. MG01-12-001]

      ( print page 21750)    
Alliance Pipeline L.P. filed revised standards of conduct on April 11, 2001 in accordance with the Commission's March 15, 2001 Order. 94 FERC ¶ 61,277 (2001).

Alliance Pipeline states that it served copies of the filing on all parties in this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or protest in this proceeding with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). All such motions to intervene or protest should be filed on or before May 10, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of these filings are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web at  ­                    *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10734  Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21



                   LIST OF IMCO RECYCLING INC. SUBSIDIARIES



Wholly owned unless otherwise indicated as of March 1, 2000.


1.  IMCO Investment Company,  a Delaware Corporation

2.  Interamerican Zinc, Inc.,  a Delaware Corporation

3.  IMCO Recycling of Ohio Inc.,  a Delaware Corporation

4.  IMCO Management Partnership L.P.,  a Texas Limited Partnership

5.  IMCO Recycling of California, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

6.  IMCO Energy Corp., a Delaware Corporation

7.  IMCO International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

8.  IMCO Recycling of Indiana Inc., a Delaware Corporation

9.  IMCO Recycling of Illinois Inc., an Illinois Corporation

10. IMCO Indiana Partnership L.P., an Indiana Limited Partnership

11. Pittsburg Aluminum, Inc., a Kansas Corporation

12. VAW-IMCO Gu(beta)und Recycling GmbH, a private company with limited
    liability organized under the laws of Germany (50% owned)

13. IMCO Recycling of Michigan L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company

14. IMCO Recycling (UK) Ltd., a private company limited by shares and organized
    under the laws of England and Wales

15. IMSAMET, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

16. IMCO Recycling of Idaho Inc., a Delaware Corporation

17. IMCO Recycling of Utah Inc., a Delaware Corporation

                                      72
<PAGE>

                   LIST OF IMCO RECYCLING INC. SUBSIDIARIES


18. Imsamet of Arizona, an Arizona General Partnership (70% owned)

19. Solar Aluminum Technology  Services, a Utah General Partnership (50% owned)

20. Rock Creek Aluminum, Inc., an Ohio Corporation

21. Alchem Aluminum, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

22. IMCO Recycling Holding B.V., a private company with limited liability
    organized under the laws of the Netherlands

23. IMCO (UK) Limited Partnership, a limited partnership organized under the
    laws of England and Wales

24. U.S. Zinc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

25. Gulf Reduction Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

26. Midwest Zinc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

27. MetalChem, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation

28. Western Zinc Corporation, a California Corporation

29. U.S. Zinc Export Corporation, a Texas Corporation

30. U.S. Zinc - FSC, Inc., a Barbados Corporation

31. MetalChem Canada Incorporated, an Ontario Corporation

32. MetalChem Handel GmbH, a private company with limited liability organized
    under the laws of Germany

33. Alchem Aluminum Shelbyville Inc., a Delaware Corporation

34. B&F Metals, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation

35. Indiana Aluminum Inc., an Indiana Corporation
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of UNOVA, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael E. Keane, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Michael E.  Keane      |     |     |
|----------------------------|----------|----------|
| Michael E. Keane           |     |     |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* | * * | * * |
| November 9, 2004           |     |     |

 

----
#### SNOW, Respondent, v. BUFFALO CREEK R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by Julia Snow, as administratrix, etc., of Israel Snow, deceased, against the Buffalo Creek Railroad Company, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Order appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Douglas A. McIntyre, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant
Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                              
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | /s/ Douglas A. McIntyre      
| |  | Douglas A. McIntyre          
| |  | Chairman, President and Chief
| |  | Executive Officer            
| |  | On2 Technologies, Inc.       
| |  | November 12, 2002
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JUNE 21 , 2016

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

WD78150 Christopher Helton vs. State of Missouri

WD78303 Craig Grandstaff vs. State of Missouri

WD78377 Larry Jones vs. State of Missouri

WD78865 David N. Briggs vs. State of Missouri

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ---------------------------------------------------------------- --

WD78510 State of Missouri vs. Thomas Joseph Presley
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, James Meyer, the
interim chief executive officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

      (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                         By:       /s/ JAMES MEYER
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                      James Meyer
                                             Interim Chief Executive Officer
                                                  On2 Technologies, Inc.

May 5, 2006
# Immersive Learning: An Important Part of Fire Service Training

**Posted: March 9, 2023**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Equipment and technology
            - Training

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

The National Fire Protection Association’s (NFPA’s) Firefighter Immersive Learning Environment project is being conducted to:
            - Identify, assess and summarize available and emerging tools that can be used in immersive learning environments for the fire service.
            - Consider the impact of these immersive learning environments on firefighter skills, health and safety during training.

## What is immersive learning?

Immersive learning environments make use of technologies like virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR) and simulation to create realistic environments for learning.

## Why is immersive learning important for firefighting?

These environments are useful for training in the fire service, especially when live training would be dangerous, resource-intensive or very technically involved.

## The reports

In January 2023, the NFPA released:

A Literature Review PDF that summarizes the current landscape of immersive learning in fire service training, focusing primarily on VR and AR.

A Focus Group Summary PDF that captures the outcomes of 5 fire training stakeholder focus groups. Stakeholders offered input on the pros and cons of using immersive training environments for fire service training and the role for immersive learning as a recruitment tool.

This project is funded by a Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Assistance to Firefighters Grant and is estimated to be completed by the third quarter of 2023.

This article is based on content in theMarch 9, 2023 InfoGram.

 Subscribe to the InfoGram
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10543]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Federal Advisory Committee for the End-to-End Review of the U.S. 
Nuclear Command and Control System (NCCS)

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of 
forthcoming meetings of the Federal Advisory Committee for the End-to-
End Review of the U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System (NCCS). The 
purpose of these meetings is to conduct a comprehensive and independent 
review of the NCCS positive measures to assure authorized use of 
nuclear weapons when directed by the President while assuring against 
unauthorized or inadvertent use. This meeting will be closed to the 
public.

DATES: May 22-23, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Eisenhower Executive Office Building, Room 208, 725 17th 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William L. Jones, U.S. Nuclear 
Command and Control System Support Staff (NSS), Skyline 3, 5201 
Leesburg Pike, Suite 500, Falls Church, Virginia 22041, (703) 681-8681.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10543 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-01-U
ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                               21 Corporate Drive
                             Clifton Park, NY 12065



Eric Ameres
10 Schermerhorn Rd.
Cohoes, NY 12047


Dear Eric:

This agreement is entered into and shall become effective as of the 11th day of
May 2005, by and between On2 Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter "On2" or
"employer") and Eric Ameres (hereinafter "employee").

On2 agrees to extend employee's contract dated September 16, 2003 for one year.
The term of the extension will commence on the date hereof and terminate on
September 15, 2006.

All the terms and conditions set forth in the employee's contract dated
September 16, 2003 shall apply to the one-year extension term.

Sincerely yours,

ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


BY: /s/ Douglas A. McIntyre
    -----------------------------------
    Name:  Douglas A. McIntyre
    Title: Chairman, President and CEO


/s/ Eric Ameres
---------------------------------------
Eric Ameres
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Nortel Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |    
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 2, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mike S. Zafirovski
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | MIKE S. ZAFIROVSKI President and Chief Executive Officer





|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |    
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 2, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paviter S. Binning
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | PAVITER S. BINNING Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Restructuring Officer
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WINMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. , Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 22

- 1829 (JDB)

ESF, INC. , et al

. ,
Defendant s
.

ORDER

U pon consideration of [ 5 ] defendant The Academy of the Holy Cross’s m otion to d ismis s ,
[7] defendant ESF , Inc. ’s m otion to d ismiss, and the entire record herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendants’ motions to dismiss are GRANTED

.

SO ORDERED

.

/s/ JOHN D . BATES United States District Judge

Dated: February 6 , 20 2 3
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (21)

                                 SUBSIDIARIES
                                 ------------

The following schedule lists the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are
directly or indirectly wholly-owned, their respective states of incorporation,
and by indentation the immediate parent of each listed subsidiary, on March 26,
1997.  The schedule includes all subsidiaries except those that, if considered
in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary.


                                                        Place of
             NAME                                     Incorporation
--------------------------------------                -------------

     BRC Holdings, Inc.                                 Delaware
     Business Records Corporation                       Delaware
     Logan Services, Inc.                               Delaware
     Dash Data Processing Corporation                   Delaware
     DLH/INE Corporation                                Delaware
     Cronus/ESL, Inc.                                   Delaware
     CMSI, Inc.                                         Oregon
     Latron Holdings, Inc.                              Oregon
     Latron Computer Systems, Inc.                      New Jersey
     The Pace Group                                     Texas
#### HEMENWAY, Respondent, v. KNUDSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by Charles P. Hemenway against Morris F. Knudson. G. A. Black, for appellant. W. M. Ivins, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 21 N. Y. Supp. 679; 25 N. Y. Supp. 1018.
Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.38 
 AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE 
 This AMENDMENT NO. 01 this (“Amendment 01”) is entered into as of June 1, 2009 by LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL PARTNERS V, L.P.
(“Lender”) and GLASSHOUSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”) with reference to the following: 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender have previously entered into that certain Loan and Security Agreement No. 4091 dated as of June 30, 2004 (as amended to date, the “Loan and Security Agreement”; all initially
capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Loan and Security Agreement) together with the other agreements and instruments entered into in connection therewith (collectively, the “Loan
Documents”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Amendment No. 05 dated May 28, 2009, to the Loan and Security
Agreement Borrower and Lender, among other modifications, entered into the First Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note dated June 1, 2009 (the “Amended Note”); and 
 WHEREAS, Borrower has requested that Lender make an additional modifications to the terms of the Amended Note; and 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereby agree to modify the Amended
Note as follows: 
 The definition of the Loan Commencement Date shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following: 
 “Loan Commencement Date” means March 1, 2010 
 Except as amended hereby, the Amended Note remains unmodified and unchanged and ratified by Borrower as though fully set forth herein. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment 01 as of the date first above
written. 
  

									
	GLASSHOUSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	 		 	LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL PARTNERS V, L.P.
					
	By:	 	 /s/    Kenneth W. Hale
	 		 	By:	 	LIGHTHOUSE MANAGEMENT PARTNERS V, 
	Name:	 	 Kenneth W. Hale
	 		 		 	L.L.C., its general partner
	Title:	 	 CFO
	 		 		 	
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/    Thomas Conneely

		 		 		 	Name:	 	 Thomas Conneely

		 		 		 	Title:	 	 Vice President
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6196 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify the deadline for filing 

a claim seeking judicial review of a permit, license, or approval issued 

by a Federal agency for a highway or public transportation capital 

project, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. COBLE, and Mr. 

GRAVES of Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to 

the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify the deadline for filing a claim seeking judicial review of a permit, 

license, or approval issued by a Federal agency for a 

highway or public transportation capital project, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6196 IH

1 SECTION 1. DEADLINE FOR CLAIMS RELATING TO HIGH2 WAY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL 

3 PROJECTS. 

4 Section 139(l) of title 23, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘180 days’’ in each of paragraphs 

6 (1) and (2) and inserting ‘‘90 days’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS