alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6382 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6382

     To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to create a 
designation for property owners who take actions to reduce nutrient and 
   sediment runoff into the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

 Mr. Sarbanes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to create a 
designation for property owners who take actions to reduce nutrient and 
   sediment runoff into the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save the Chesapeake Bay Homeowner 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION.

    Section 117(g) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1267(g)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Designation program.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the 
                date of enactment of the Save the Chesapeake Bay 
                Homeowner Act of 2010, the Administrator shall develop 
                and implement the `Save the Chesapeake Bay Home' 
                designation program.
                    ``(B) Designation requirement.--The program under 
                subparagraph (A) shall designate a property owner in 
                the Chesapeake Bay watershed as a participant in such 
                program if the property owner performs a specified 
                number of items from a list of actions developed by the 
                Administrator to reduce nutrient and sediment runoff 
                into the Chesapeake Bay.
                    ``(C) Total maximum daily load credit.--The 
                Administrator shall determine an appropriate amount of 
                credit for compliance with total maximum daily load 
                requirements to award to a State or their designee 
                based on the number of property owners in the 
                jurisdiction who have received a designation under the 
                program.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.b

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Theodore Misiewicz, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | ***/S/ THEODORE MISIEWICZ***

         |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Date: June 2, 2006 | Theodore Misiewicz

Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Active Power, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John K. Penver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15d, as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John K. PenverJohn K. PenverVice President of Finance and Chief Financial
OfficerJuly 28, 2005
#### In the Matter of Thomas P. Tobin, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

February 5, 1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Grace D. Moran*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on June 23, 1954. By order of this court dated April 18, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this court.

On October 3, 1989, the respondent was convicted in the County Court, Nassau County, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of attempted grand larceny in the third degree in violation of Penal Law §§ 155.35 and 110.05 which constitutes a class E felony.

*341Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and it is directed that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective . immediately, the respondent Thomas P. Tobin is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent Thomas P. Tobin is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jukka Härmälä, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Stora Enso Oyj;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 21, 2006



/s/ JUKKA HÄRMÄLÄJukka Härmälä Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6412 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6412

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2010

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to require the Attorney General 
 to share criminal records with State sentencing commissions, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Criminal History Records 
for State Sentencing Commissions Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO SHARE CRIMINAL RECORDS WITH STATE 
              SENTENCING COMMISSIONS.

    Section 534(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after ``, the States'' the following: ``, including State 
sentencing commissions''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6385 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6385

 To repeal the unearned income Medicare contribution provision in the 
         Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

Mr. Smith of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the unearned income Medicare contribution provision in the 
         Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF UNEARNED INCOME MEDICARE CONTRIBUTION.

    Section 1402 of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 
2010 (Public Law 111-153), and the amendments made by such section, are 
hereby repealed; and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied 
as if such section, and amendments, had never been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
#### Yevgeniya Alter, Appellant, v Aron Chervin, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), dated June 2, 1987, which granted the motion of the defendant Aron Chervin pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate a default judgment *796entered against him and in favor of the plaintiff, and directed the plaintiff to accept his notice of appearance with a demand for a complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion is denied.

We find that the respondent’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him should have been denied. In his affidavit of merit, the respondent acknowledged an awareness of the hazardous condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff to sustain injuries, and additionally stated that his failure to correct the condition was "inadvertent”. It is apparent that these allegations do not present a viable defense and, in fact, may constitute a concession of liability. Therefore, the respondent’s purported affidavit of merit was deficient, and the respondent’s motion to vacate the default judgment should have been denied. Mullen, P. J., Eiber, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
(September 24, 1987)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Pastrana, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Collins, J.), rendered on November 13, 1985, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. —Motion Ross, Asch, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1570

_____________________________

J.B., Mother of B.P., M.P., and

K.E., Minor Children,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

Ross M. Goodman, Judge.

November 8, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Randall A. Werre of Werre Law Firm, P.A., Milton, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children and 

Families, Tallahassee, for Appellee; Thomasina Moore, Statewide 

Director, and David P. Krupski, Appellate Counsel, Guardian ad 

Litem Program, Sanford; and Sara Goldfarb, Appellate Counsel, 

Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 09-16

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), and in order to meet the needs of the Court, eligible

retired judges may be recalled by the Chief Judge to perform substantial service. Retired Judge

Lawrence B. Hagel, having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired

judge. The Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Hagel would provide

substantial service by completing matters that were assigned to him prior to his retirement. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective October 13, 2016, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel is recalled from

retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). When in service, Judge Hagel shall have

and exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active service. Judge

Hagel shall perform substantial service for the Court intermittently through the end of this calendar

year in accordance with this order and as requested by the Chief Judge. 

DATED: October 13, 2016 BY THE COURT:

ROBERT N. DAVIS 

Chief Judge
#### In the Matter of Corliss Buchanan, Petitioner, v David Axelrod, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, dated October 14, 1987, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s request to expunge the record of a report of patient abuse and neglect, and directed that a civil penalty in the amount of $50 be assessed against her.

*569Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

There was substantial evidence adduced at the hearing to support the determination that the petitioner had committed an act of neglect and abuse as defined in 10 NYCRR 81.1 (a) and (c) by causing an elderly patient to be bruised when the petitioner physically forced the patient out of her room despite her objections and despite the fact that such actions violated the policy of the nursing home *(see, Zucker v Axelrod,*139 AD2d 966; *Matter of Alexander v Axelrod,*125 AD2d 665; *People v Coe,*131 Misc 2d 807, *affd*126 AD2d 436, *affd 71*NY2d 852).

We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Spatt, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0064

_________________

MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION

CTR. and SIERRA CLUB,

 Plaintiffs/Appellees,

 v.

WESTMORELAND ROSEBUD MINING, LLC, f/k/a 

WESTERN ENERGY CO., NAT. RES. PARTNERS, L.P.,

INT'L UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 

400, and N. CHEYENNE COAL MINERS ASS'N,

 Respondent-Intervenors/Appellants.

__________________________________________________

MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION

CTR. and SIERRA CLUB,

 Petitioners/Appellees,

 v.

MONTANA DEP'T OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,

 Respondent/Appellant,

MONTANA BD. OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,

WESTMORELAND ROSEBUD MINING, LLC, f/k/a

WESTERN ENERGY CO., NAT. RES. PARTNERS L.P.,

INT'L UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 

400, and N. CHEYENNE COAL MINERS ASS'N,

 Respondents.

_______________________________________________

MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION

CTR. and SIERRA CLUB,

O R D E R

10/03/2022
 Plaintiffs/Appellees,

 v.

MONTANA DEP'T OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,

MONTANA BD. OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,

 Respondents,

 and

WESTMORELAND ROSEBUD MINING, LLC, f/k/a

WESTERN ENERGY CO., NAT. RES. PARTNERS L.P., 

INT'L UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 

400, and N. CHEYENNE COAL MINERS ASS'N,

 Respondent-Intervenors/Appellants.

_________________

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion for extension of time filed by 

Appellees Montana Environmental Information Center and Sierra Club and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Appellees shall file 

their combined response brief on or before November 4, 2022.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 3 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,343
<INVENTORY>                                     12,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,415
<PP&E>                                         269,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 563,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,207
<BONDS>                                        195,064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           308
<OTHER-SE>                                     309,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   563,032
<SALES>                                        342,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               346,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  318,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               273,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                31,805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,185
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List Proposed Addition; Correction

    In the document appearing on page 19136, FR Doc 01-9234, in the 
issue of April 13, 2001, in the second column the Committee published a 
proposed addition to the Procurement List for Data Entry, Department of 
Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Washington, DC. The 
proposed addition notice is amended to read Data Entry for the Non-
Immigrant Information System (NIIS) and Student/School (STSC) System, 
Department of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service, 
Washington, DC

Rita L. Wells,
Deputy Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 01-10533 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
                         ACHIEVEMENT TEC HOLDINGS, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Achievement Tec Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Guy
Pipolo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Achievement  Tec Holdings,  Inc. and will be retained by Achievement
Tec Holdings,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date:  October 24, 2003

/s/ Guy Pipolo
--------------
Guy Pipolo
Chief Financial Officer