alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,998
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                        55
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,863
<PP&E>                                           1,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                     352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,007
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,957
<OTHER-SE>                                        (264)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,023
<SALES>                                          9,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,150
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  79
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    740
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                440
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       440
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Mark Tangredi, Petitioner, v Walter Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Determination unanimously annulled on the law and petition granted *(see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*125 AD2d 923, *lv granted*69 NY2d 608). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001044607
<NAME>  HYDROCHEM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
[LEGEND]
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
[/LEGEND]
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          29,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,262
<PP&E>                                          68,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,582
<SALES>                                         40,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,888
<CGS>                                           24,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    127
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 52
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        52
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CLICKABLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Nicholas Cirillo, Jr., President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:  October 7, 2004


/s/ Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.
---------------------------------------
Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.
President (Principal Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Turcios-Umana, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered September 15, 1986, convicting him of rape in the first degree (four counts) and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Initially, we find that the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing demonstrates that the police officer who interviewed the defendant at the precinct was sufficiently trained and experienced in speaking and writing the Spanish language to enable him to properly advise the defendant of his *Miranda*rights and accurately transcribe his confession. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the officer conducting the interview was capable of providing him with an understanding of the police inquiry *(cf., People v Turkenich,*137 AD2d 363; *People v Medrano,*133 Misc 2d 811).

Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, we are convinced that no substantial right of the defendant was prejudiced by the delay in production of certain *Rosario*
      *708material *(see, People v Ranghelle,*69 NY2d 56; *People v Perez,*65 NY2d 154). The existence of the crime report was revealed during cross-examination of a prosecution rebuttal witness. Defense counsel did not object to the prosecutor’s failure to turn over this document *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). Although the discovery of this *Rosario*material presented the opportunity of recalling the complainant to the witness stand to further cross-examine her with respect to her statement to the investigating detective, defense counsel chose not to exercise this right *(cf., People v Goins,*143 AD2d 593, *lv denied*73 NY2d 855). Accordingly, the *Rosario*material was made available to defense counsel at the trial in time for its effective presentation for the jury’s consideration, if he was so advised *(see, People v Perez,*65 NY2d 154, 159-160, *supra; People v Plunkett,*140 AD2d 553, 554).

The defendant’s claim that the prosecutor delivered an improper summation is unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]). Nor is reversal warranted in the interest of justice.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including his claim of excessive sentence, and find them to be without merit. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Stora Enso Oyj (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Esko Mäkeläinen, Senior Executive Vice President, Finance, Accounting and Legal Affairs, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: October 7, 2005



/s/    ESKO MÄKELÄINENEsko Mäkeläinen Senior Executive Vice President, Finance, Accounting and Legal Affairs, and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
certification required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1312-000]


Bethlehem Steel Corporation; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 25, 2001.
    Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Bethlehem will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions at market-based rates. Bethlehem also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Bethlehem 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Bethlehem.
    On April 3, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Bethlehem should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Bethlehem is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Bethlehem's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 3, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10744 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit        32.1 **

**STATEMENT        PURSUANT TO **

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|                                        |                                                                                                                                                                              |         |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
|                                        |                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                   |                                                                                                                                                                         |    |
| Date: *August                25, 2005* | By:                                                                                                                                                                     | /s/     |
|                                        | *Winston                Johnson, Chairman,**Chief                Executive Officer and*        *Chief                  Financial Officer* |
|                                        |                                                                                                                                                                              |
#### *In re*GABE, Caryl Jacobs

(MR 21734)

Barrington, IL

Order of the Court:

The petition by respondent Caryl Jacobs Gabe for leave to file exceptions to the report and recommendation of the Review Board is denied. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for six months, as recommended by the Review Board. Suspension effective October 9, 2007. Respondent Caryl Jacobs Gabe shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from her conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 622 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the credit for 

renewable electricity production to include electricity produced from biomass for on-site use. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2009 

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself, Mr. PLATTS, and Mr. GORDON of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the credit for renewable electricity production to include 

electricity produced from biomass for on-site use. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY 

4 PRODUCTION CREDIT FOR BIOMASS FACILI5 TIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 45 of the 

7 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following new paragraph: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 622 IH

1 ‘‘(12) CREDIT ALLOWED FOR ELECTRICITY

2 PRODUCED FROM BIOMASS FOR ON-SITE USE.—In 

3 the case of electricity produced after December 31, 

4 2008, at any facility described in paragraph (2) or 

5 (3) of subsection (d) which is equipped with a meter6 ing device to determine electricity consumption or 

7 sale, subsection (a)(2) shall be applied without re8 gard to subparagraph (B) thereof with respect to 

9 such electricity produced and consumed at such fa10 cility.’’. 

11 (b) CREDIT PERIOD FOR ELECTRICITY PRODUCED

12 FROM OPEN-LOOP BIOMASS FOR ON-SITE USE.—Sub13 paragraph (B) of section 45(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

14 Code of 1986 is amended— 

15 (1) by striking ‘‘clause (ii) or clause (iii)’’ in 

16 clause (i) and inserting ‘‘clause (ii), (iii), or (iv)’’, 

17 (2) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv), 

18 and 

19 (3) by inserting after clause (ii) the following 

20 new clause: 

21 ‘‘(iii) ELECTRICITY PRODUCED FOR

22 ON-SITE USE AT CERTAIN OPEN-LOOP BIO23 MASS FACILITIES.—In the case of elec24 tricity produced and consumed as de25 scribed in subsection (e)(12) at any facility 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 622 IH

1 described in subsection (d)(3)(A)(ii) which 

2 is placed in service before the date of the 

3 enactment of this clause, the 5-year period 

4 beginning on January 1, 2009, shall be 

5 substituted for the 10-year period in sub6 section (a)(2)(A)(ii).’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

9 of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# FEMA’s Mitigation Assessment Team Releases First Report in the Aftermath of a Wildfire

**Posted: Aug. 10, 2023**

            -   Find similar articles:
            - Fire investigation
            - Health and safety
            - Planning
            - Wildfire and WUI

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

A newly released Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mitigation Assessment Team (MAT) report on the 2021 Marshall Fire is the first FEMA publication to evaluate building performance and share observations in the aftermath of a wildfire.

FEMA studied this fire because the weather conditions and impacts on the built environment in the nontraditional wildland urban interface highlight risks that need to be better understood by planners, developers, government officials and the public at large both locally in Colorado and nationwide.

Several factors have been attributed to the devastation caused by the Marshall Fire:

extreme winds (some at 115 mph)

long-term drought

unseasonably high temperatures

limitations in existing wildfire safety and planning regulations

The fire destroyed 1,000 single- and multifamily homes and commercial structures in Louisville, Superior, and unincorporated Boulder County, Colorado. Because of the unique nature of the incident, a fast-moving grass fire became a highly destructive urban conflagration that directly and indirectly impacted several communities and the greater Boulder County area.

As a result, the FEMA Building Science Disaster Support Program deployed its first-ever wildfire MAT to evaluate building performance during the fire.

In the report, learn more about some unique observations made by the team:
              - how building components prevented or contributed to the spread of fire to structures,
              - how neighborhoods with homes that had less than 30 feet of separation suffered greater losses,
              - how unmanaged drainage ditches throughout the area acted as “wildfire superhighways,” facilitating the rapid spread of wildfire through the community.

The report and 7 accompanying documents can be used by planners, fire departments and community leaders to help create better wildfire planning documents, as well as develop and implement more effective wildfire mitigation projects including structure and landscape improvements.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Industry Sector Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business (ISAC-14) will hold a meeting on May 9, 2001, from 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. The meeting will be opened to the public from 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for May 9, 2001, unless otherwise notified.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the USA Trade Center/Ronald Reagan Building, Training Room B located at 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Millie Sjoberg and Pam Wilbur (202) 482-4792, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (principal contact), or myself on (202) 395-6120.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

During the meeting the agenda topics to be addressed will be the trip to the OECD Montreal Meeting in June and the vote on the transition papers.

Christina Sevilla,

Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.

[FR Doc. 01-10532  Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
June 26, 2002

Mr. Pelham Smith
4123 Southwestern Blvd.
Dallas, Texas 75225

Dear Pelham:

This letter shall confirm the following  amendments to the letter agreement (the
"Letter  Agreement")  dated as of March 27, 2002  between  HydroChem  Industrial
Services, Inc. and you:

         1.  All references in the Letter Agreement to the date of June 30, 2002
shall be changed to September 30, 2002.

         2.  The reference in the third sub paragraph of the Letter Agreement to
the date of June 30, 2003 shall be changed to September 30, 2003.


If the  foregoing is  satisfactory,  please sign this letter below and return to
me. A duplicate original is enclosed for your records.


                                                          Sincerely,

                                                          /s/ B. Tom Carter, Jr.
                                                          ----------------------
                                                              B. Tom Carter, Jr.
                                                              Chairman and Chief
                                                              Executive Officer

AGREED AND ACCEPTED


/s/ Pelham Smith
----------------
Pelham Smith
June 28, 2002