alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Robert T. Faber, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GoldSpring, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    /s/ ROBERT T. FABER   Robert T. Faber *Chief Financial Officer*
Date: April 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford K. Bown,
certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended on March 31, 2008, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Clifford K. Bown        
|Clifford K. Bown            
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     
|May 9, 2008
#### *In re*BECK, Dwight Lenore

(MR 20936)

Calumet City, IL

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Dwight Lenore Beck is suspended from the practice of law for two years and until further order of the Court, effective immediately.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8396

STEVE MORRISON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW W. PENNELL,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00127-GCM)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Morrison, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Steve Morrison appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Morrison v. Pennell , No. 5:08-cv-00127-GCM (W.D.N.C.
Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GameTech
International, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended April 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John P. Hewitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /S/ John P. HewittJohn P. HewittChief Financial OfficerJune
14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Capital Growth Fund 1997 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000201529
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL GROWTH FUND
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          42,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,630)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         30,690
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,465)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,155
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,488
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    24.82<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Jerome M. Marks et al., Respondents, v State of New York, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The trial court erred in adopting the method used by claimants’ appraiser to value the subject properties for their potential commercial highest and best usef It is well settled that property is to be valued as it exists on the date of taking and that an increment is to be added to reflect the potential use *(Matter of County of Suffolk [Firester],*37 NY2d 649; *Liere v State of New York,*39 AD2d 980; *Hewitt v State of New York,*18 AD2d 1128). The comparable sales considered by the State’s appraiser had a potential commercial use similar to that of the subject properties and were situated along the same highway. Thus we adopt the State’s before-taking valuations as follows:



The trial court’s findings of highest and best use and value after the appropriation are supported by the record and are affirmed. Accordingly, we modify the judgments to award damages on claim No. 70448 in the sum of $34,700; claim No. 70457 in the sum of $13,800; and claim No. 70458 in the sum of $11,550. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, Corbett, *931J. — appropriation.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6412 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6412

To amend title 28, United States Code, to require the Attorney General 
 to share criminal records with State sentencing commissions, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2010

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to require the Attorney General 
 to share criminal records with State sentencing commissions, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Criminal History Records 
for State Sentencing Commissions Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO SHARE CRIMINAL RECORDS WITH STATE 
              SENTENCING COMMISSIONS.

    Section 534(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after ``, the States'' the following: ``, including State 
sentencing commissions''.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3792

_____________________________

MARY HEKTNER,

Appellant,

v.

SCHOOL BOARD OF BREVARD 

COUNTY, and SEDGWICK CMS,

INC.,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Robert L. Dietz, Judge.

Date of Accident: April 20, 1995.

April 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Toni L. Villaverde of Toni L. Villaverde, PLLC, Coral Gables, for 

Appellant.

William H. Rogner of Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox & Waranch, 

P.A., Winter Park, for Appellees.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2014

No. 04-14-00720-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF N.D.,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-MH-3263

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's first motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to January 5, 2015.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Healthworld Consolidated Balance Sheets and statements of income for the three
months ended March 31, 1998 and 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Form 10Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                              16678
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                       17359    
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    37774
<PP&E>                               5112
<DEPRECIATION>                       2570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      44619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               18414
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               74
<OTHER-SE>                          24996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        44619
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    13988
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       13664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (190)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       514
<INCOME-TAX>                          210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   304
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                          304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.04
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 30, 2019

No. 04-19-00849-CV

WEBB COUNTY, TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Ricardo 'Rick' Manuel ROMO,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVI001385D4

Honorable Joel B. Johnson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a response to this court’s December 

16, 2019 show cause order is granted. We order appellant to file a response that complies with 

this court’s December 16, 2019 show cause order by January 10, 2020.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          15,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,147
<INVENTORY>                                     65,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               199,767
<PP&E>                                         847,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,928,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          136,324
<BONDS>                                      1,330,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       749,722
<OTHER-SE>                                   (273,724)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,928,660
<SALES>                                        363,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,662
<CGS>                                           77,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (67,081)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,701)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,782)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Lazare Kaplan International Inc.New York, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8, No. 333-40225, No. 333-92077 and No. 333-52303) of Lazare Kaplan International of our report dated August 28, 2007, relating
to the consolidated financial statements, which appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed with the SEC on August 29, 2007 on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August 28, 2007 relating to
the financial statement schedule, which appears in the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2007.

/S/ BDO Seidman, LLPNew York, NYAugust 25, 2008

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Lazare Kaplan International Inc.New York, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements (Form S-8, No. 333-40225, No. 333-92077 and No.
333-52303) of Lazare Kaplan International of our report dated August 27, 2007,
relating to the Bellataire financial statements, an equity investee, which is
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A which was filed with the SEC on
August 26, 2008.

/S/ BDO Seidman, LLPNew York, NYAugust 25, 2008

---
Exhibit 23.1




















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-37261, 33-69596, 33-69598, 33-61558, 333-79443, 333-08994,
333-42635, 333-36146, 333-36150, 333-112527 and 333-138524) and Form S-3
(No. 333-137998) of Southern Union Company of our report dated February 29, 2008
relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
10-K.














Houston,
Texas


February
29, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           CLICKABLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Guy
Pipolo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




Date:  November 18, 2004


/s/ Guy Pipolo
----------------------
Guy Pipolo
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0563

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KASEY NICHOL HUGS,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including September 28, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

State’s response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 22 2023

08/22/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0563
(9 Misc. Rep. 170.)

#### MONROE-MILLER CO. v. STOKES.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

June 27, 1894.)

Appeal—From City Court to Common Pleas—Interlocutory Judgment.

A judgment of the general term of the city court of New York affirming a judgment of the special term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, the remaining issues tendered by the pleadings being untried, is interlocutory, and therefore not appealable to the court of common pleas.

Appeal from city court, general term.

Action by the Monroe-Miller Company against Edward S. Stokes. From a judgment of the city court (27 N. Y. Supp. 940) affirming a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the answer, defendant appeals.

Dismissed.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

John Delahunty, for appellant.

Wm. H. Shepard, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

The answer, besides denying the alleged conversion, interposed a counterclaim for rent. A judgment at special term, sustaining the demurrer to the counterclaim, was affirmed at general term of the court below, and from the judgment of affirmance defendant has attempted to appeal to this court. The remaining issues tendered by the pleadings are untried, and that judgments of the character alluded to are severally interlocutory was ruled in Biershenk v. Stokes (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 18 N. Y. Supp. 854. An appeal to this court from a judgment of the city court of New York may be taken only when the judgment is final and was rendered upon an appeal to the general term. Code Civ. Proc. § 3191, subd. 1. The appeal must be dismissed, with costs.