alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6494 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 to improve the Littoral Combat Ship program 

of the Navy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6494 EH

1 SECTION 1. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP PROGRAM. 

2 (a) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of sec3 tion 121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

4 Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2211) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘ten Littoral Combat Ships 

8 and 15 Littoral Combat Ship ship control and 

9 weapon systems’’ and inserting ‘‘20 Littoral 

10 Combat Ships, including any ship control and 

11 weapon systems the Secretary determines nec12 essary for such ships,’’; and 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘a contract’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘one or more contracts’’; and 

15 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘liability to’’ 

16 and inserting ‘‘liability of’’. 

17 (b) TECHNICAL DATA PACKAGE.—Subsection 

18 (b)(2)(A) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘a second 

19 shipyard, as soon as practicable’’ and inserting ‘‘another 

20 shipyard to build a design specification for that Littoral 

21 Combat Ship’’. 

22 (c) LIMITATION OF COSTS.—Subsection (c)(1) of 

23 such section is amended by striking ‘‘awarded to a con-
3 

•HR 6494 EH

1 tractor selected as part of a procurement’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘under a contract’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 15, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6494 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act 

Combat Ship program of the Navy. for Fiscal Year 2010 to improve the Littoral
exhibit10-35.htm


Exhibit 10.35

 


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT





This Employment Agreement Amendment (this "Amendment"), dated March 30, 2010, is by and between Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter "Glowpoint"), and Joseph Laezza (hereinafter "Employee").  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment
Agreement (as defined below).





WHEREAS, Employee and Glowpoint entered into an Employment Agreement on March 11, 2004, as amended May 15, 2007, November 24, 2008 and March 12, 2009 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”);





WHEREAS, the Employee’s employment term is currently scheduled to expire on January 31, 2011; and





WHEREAS, the Company wishes to extend Employee’s employment term, and Employee wishes to continue to work for Company;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1. Term; Position.  The Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete “until January 31, 2011”
in the first sentence of Section 1.1 and replace it with “until January 31, 2012”.





2. Entire Agreement.  This Amendment is the final, complete and exclusive agreement between the Parties
relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous proposals, understandings, representations, warranties, promises and other communications, whether oral or written, relating to such subject matter.  Unless specifically amended by this Amendment, all terms of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and are in full force and effect.  If any provision of the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to
be unenforceable for any reason, the remaining provisions hereof shall be unaffected and remain in full force and effect.





In Witness Whereof, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.






	
Glowpoint, Inc.
	  
	
 

By: /s/ Edwin F. Heinen

Ed Heinen, CFO
	
 

/s/ Joseph Laezza                                                   

Joseph Laezza
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LET'S TALK CELLULAR AND WIRELESS INC FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,780,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,182,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                   610,803
<INVENTORY>                                 18,449,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,286,168
<PP&E>                                      17,753,592
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,929,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,836,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,822,575
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,498
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,496,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,836,323
<SALES>                                     33,354,879
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,354,879
<CGS>                                       14,288,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,545,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,297,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             663,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,559,585
<INCOME-TAX>                                   623,834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            935,751
<DISCONTINUED>                                  83,967
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   824,581
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
# Fire Stop Tour 2024

**Posted: Jan. 20, 2024**

            - Share on:
            - 
            - 
            - 

US fire administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency Region V administrator and nation’s fire service leaders to travel to Detroit, Chicago and Columbus to urge public to be fire safe and #WinterReady ahead of U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Extreme Cold Summit

Washington D.C – Fire dangers increase during the winter months and claim more lives than during any other time of the year. More than 25 children across the country have already died in home fires since Jan. 1, 2024. The total number of fatalities so far is 142, an average of 8 fire fatalities a day. At this rate, fire deaths are on track to hit 3,000 in 2024, topping the nearly 2,300 deaths that occurred in 2023, which included 232 children, 498 older adults and 85 firefighters.

Deaths caused by fire are only part of the story, as there are thousands of displacements when homes are destroyed, contributing to the homelessness numbers across the nation.

These sobering statistics highlight the need to educate the public on ways to protect themselves, especially during winter months, as cold weather brings additional home fire risks. Unwanted and destructive fires are preventable, and the steps people take to prepare now can save lives.

On Jan. 22, 23 and 24, Dr. Lori Moore-Merrell, the head of the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA), will join the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region 5 Administrator Tom Sivak and leaders of America’s national fire service organizations in Detroit, Chicago and Columbus, Ohio, respectively, to draw public attention to fire safety measures that can be taken to make sure children and older adults are both fire safe and #WinterReady.

This event will take place ahead of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Extreme Cold Summit, which aims to convene voices and resources from across the country to share local community challenges, winter vulnerabilities and real-life actionable steps to combat the impact of extreme cold.

Federal, local and national organization leaders will be available for interviews before and immediately following the press event.

### Additional Media Contacts

            - Evrim Bunn, External Affairs Officer, USFA, FEMA,  evrim.bunn@fema.dhs.gov .
            - Teresa Neal, Chief of Communications, USFA, FEMA  teresa.neal@fema.dhs.gov .
#### KISSAM v. DITMAN.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

June 11, 1894.)

Action by John W. Kissam against Andrew J. Ditman.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent should have obtained an order declaring the case on appeal abandoned, and then moved under the second subdivision of section 6 of the Rules of this court. The motion to dismiss the appeal should be denied, but without costs.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (3)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (4)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /S/ James C. Wilson

James C. WilsonChief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2006
 25
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Technology Transfer Act of 1986; Exploration Company of Delaware, 
Inc.

AGENCY: Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Cooperative Research and Development 
Agreement (CRADA) Negotiations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating 
entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) 
with the Exploration Company of Delaware, Inc., to obtain and 
characterize various coalbeds from the Maverick Basin, in south Texas.

INQUIRIES: If any other parties are interested in similar activities 
with the USGS, please contact Charles E. Barker, USGS Denver Federal 
Center, Sixth Ave. and Kipling St., Building 20, MS 977, Denver, CO 
80225, (303) 236-5797.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is submitted to meet the USGS 
requirements stipulated in Survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

P. Patrick Leahy,
Associate Director for Geology.
[FR Doc. 01-10816 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-47-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21064-21065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10556]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 620

RIN 3052-AB94


Disclosure to Shareholders; Annual Report; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule 
under part 620 on March 12, 2001 (66 FR 14299). This final rule 
provides that a bank need not distribute its annual report to the 
shareholders of its related associations unless it experiences a 
``significant event.'' The final rule also requires all associations to 
disclose, in a separate section of their annual report, specified 
information about their financial and supervisory relationship with 
their funding bank. This final rule benefits banks, associations, and 
their shareholders because it allows the banks and associations to 
share necessary information with shareholders at a reduced cost. In 
accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is 
30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register during 
which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the

[[Page 21065]]

records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the 
regulations is April 27, 2001.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulation amending 12 CFR part 620 published on 
March 12, 2001 (66 FR 14299) is effective April 27, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tong-Ching Chang, Policy Analyst, Office of Policy and Analysis, Farm 
Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4498;
    or

Alison C. Samarias, Attorney Advisor, Office of General Counsel, Farm 
Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TDD (703) 
883-4444.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))
    Dated: April 24, 2001.
Kelly Mikel Williams,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 01-10556 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

## **CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),James L. Bildner, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               This report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

2.               The information contained in this reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the registrant.

 

 
| Dated:  May 12, 2003 |   | /s/ James L.  Bildner                     |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | James L. Bildner, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
----

**EXHIBIT      32-1**

**CERTIFICATE      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                 Alex Hazan                                                                                                                        |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Alex                Hazan Chairman of                the Board of Directors and Chief                Executive OfficerJanuary                31, 2007 |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of advisory committee meeting date change. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board (DBS) Task Force on Systems Technology for the Future U.S. Strategic Posture closed meeting scheduled for May 16-17, 2001, has been changed to May 30-31, 2001. The meeting will be held at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA.

Dated: April 25, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01-10895 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 29, 2016

t0426

Order 

Clerk

April 29, 2016

152519

DENISE FOWLER, as Next Friend of 

VIRGINIA JANE RAWLUSZKI,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152519

COA: 310890 

Bay CC: 11-003317-NO

MENARD, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

including, among the issues to be briefed, whether the crosswalk installed by the 

defendant had a special aspect that could create liability for even an open and obvious 

hazard, and whether such a special aspect can exist if the condition is not unreasonably 

dangerous. See Hoffner v Lanctoe, 492 Mich 450, 455 (2012); Lugo v Ameritech Corp, 

Inc, 464 Mich 512, 517 (2001). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their

application papers.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DERRICK JOHN SHAW

, §

§ No. 674 , 201 4

Defendant Below

, §

Appellant, § Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware in and

v. § for New Castle County

§

WELLS FARGO BANK

, § C.A. No. N13L

- 05

- 122

§

Plaintiff Below

, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: February 3 , 2015

Decided: February 16 , 2015

O R D E R

T his 16 th day of February 2015

, it appears to the Court that , on

January 13, 2015, the Senior Clerk issued a notice directing that the

appellant, Derrick John Shaw, show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed for Shaw’s failure to pay the Superior Court record preparation

fee. Shaw has failed to respond to the notice to show cause and has not paid

the Superior Court record preparation fee. Under these circumstances,

dismissal of th e appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that th is appea l is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is

not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40928

Summary Calendar

 

RONALD J. HOLLEMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Director,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

Defendants,

MILTON BROCK, Assistant Warden;

ALFRED JANICEK, Field Major;

LLOYD ASCHBERGER, Physician Assistant,

Estelle Regional Medical Facility,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:96-CV-32

- - - - - - - - - -

May 28, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Ronald J. Holleman, Texas prisoner # 297567, appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case as frivolous. Appellee’s motion to strike exhibits is DENIED AS MOOT
1 Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).

2

as the court decided the case based upon the district court record; no records attached to appellate

briefs were used in the resolution ofthis case. Holleman’s complaint, liberally construed, alleges that

defendant Brock, motivated by racial animus or retaliatory motives, conspired with the other

defendantsto alter Holleman’s medical restrictions and to force him to work beyond his capabilities.

The district court improperly relied upon prison records to refute these allegations. See Williams v.

Luna, 909 F.2d 121, 124 (5th Cir. 1990). The case is remanded for a Spears1hearing, at which time

the court may use credibility determinations to dismiss the case as frivolous only if it finds that

Holleman changes position when exposed to interrogation or conflicting evidence, that majorinternal

inconsistencies exist in his testimony, or that substantial conflicts exist between the testimony of

supporting witnesses. Wesson v. Oglesby, 910 F.2d 278, 282 (5th Cir. 1990).

The district court properly dismissed those portions of Holleman’s complaint alleging due

process violations as precluded by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995), and it correctly

found that Holleman’s claim that his good time credits were taken without due process of law were

premature as he has not pursued his state remedies. See Clarke v. Stalder, 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th

Cir. 1997). To the extent Holleman argues that the disciplinary proceedings were improperly brought

in retaliation for his assertion of his constitutionalrights, however, theysurvive. SeeWoods v. Smith,

60 F.3d 1161, 1165 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Holleman challenges the district court’s order denying his motion for discovery sanctions.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to award sanctions. See Richardson v.

Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir. 1990). This ruling does not prejudice Holleman’s right to
3

reargue, and the district court’sright to reconsider, granting additional discovery ifsuch is warranted

after a Spears hearing is held.

 REMANDED.