alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6440 

To amend the Fair Housing Act to provide an exemption for any person 

seeking to enter into a shared living arrangement with a person sharing 

similar religious opinions or religious beliefs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2010 

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Housing Act to provide an exemption 

for any person seeking to enter into a shared living 

arrangement with a person sharing similar religious opinions or religious beliefs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE SHARED LIVING EX4 EMPTION. 

5 Section 807 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 3607) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(c) Section 804(c) shall not apply to any notice, 

8 statement, or advertisement that indicates a preference by 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6440 IH

1 any person to enter into a shared living arrangement with 

2 a person sharing similar religious opinions or religious be3 liefs. 

4 ‘‘(d) For purposes of this section, the term ‘shared 

5 living arrangement’ means an agreement in which the oc6 cupants of a dwelling share living space within the dwell7 ing.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Guide to Judiciary Policy 

Vol 14: Procurement 

Ch 7: Contract Administration 

Appx 7C: Sample Change of Name Agreement 

The _____________________(i.e. ABC Corporation) (contractor), a corporation duly 

organized and existing under the laws of __________ [insert State], and the United 

States Of America (judiciary), enter into this Agreement as of __________ [insert date 

when the change of name became effective under applicable State law]. 

(a) 	 The parties agree to the following facts: 

(1) 	 The judiciary, represented by various contracting officers has entered into 

certain contracts and purchase orders with the ________________(i.e.. 

XYZ Corporation), namely: ____________ [insert contract or purchase 

order identifications]; [or delete "namely" and insert "as shown in the 

attached list marked "Exhibit A" and incorporated in this Agreement by 

reference."]. The term "the contracts," as used in this Agreement, means 

the above contracts and purchase orders and all other contracts and 

purchase orders, including all modifications, made by the judiciary and the 

contractor before the effective date of this Agreement (whether or not 

performance and payment have been completed and releases executed if 

the judiciary or the contractor has any remaining rights, duties, or 

obligations under these contracts and purchase orders). 

(2) 	 The _____________(XYZ Corporation), by an amendment to its certificate 

of incorporation, dated _________ 20___, has changed its corporate 

name to ___________(ABC Corporation). 

(3) 	 This amendment accomplishes a change of corporate name only and all 

rights and obligations of the judiciary and of the contractor under the 

contracts are unaffected by this change. 

(4) 	 Documentary evidence of this change of corporate name has been filed 

with the judiciary. 

(b) 	 In consideration of these facts, the parties agree that: 

(1) 	 the contracts covered by this Agreement are amended by substituting the 

name __________________("ABC Corporation") for the name 

Last revised June 29, 2010 
Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 14, Appx. 7C	 Page 2 

_________________("XYZ Corporation") wherever it appears in the 

contracts; and 

(2) 	 each party has executed this Agreement as of the day and year first 

above written. 

United States of America 

By _____________________________________________ 

Title ___________________________________________ 

ABC Corporation 

By _____________________________________________ 

Title ___________________________________________ 

[Corporate Seal] 

Certificate 

I, ___________, certify that I am the Secretary of ___________________(ABC 

Corporation); that ___________, who signed this Agreement for this corporation, was 

then _____________ of this corporation; and that this Agreement was duly signed for 

and on behalf of this corporation by authority of its governing body and within the 

scope of its corporate powers. Witness my hand and the seal of this corporation this 

________ day of ____________ 20___.

 By _____________________________________________ 


 [Corporate Seal]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,108,103
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,151,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                        86,000
<INVENTORY>                                      3,413,294
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,445,620
<PP&E>                                             532,448
<DEPRECIATION>                                     137,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,310,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,376,764
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             3,333
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,303,882) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,310,871
<SALES>                                         30,987,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,987,966
<CGS>                                           26,132,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,018,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 246,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    653,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                       314,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                339,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                           10,120
<NET-INCOME>                                       329,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .16
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6300 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6300

           To provide for general revenue sharing for States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

  Mr. Kucinich (for himself and Mr. Filner) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To provide for general revenue sharing for States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local Spending Will Help 
Save America Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. GENERAL REVENUE SHARING.

    (a) Appropriation.--There is authorized to be appropriated and is 
appropriated to carry out this section $200,000,000,000 for each of 
fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
    (b) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay to each State 
on a quarterly basis an amount equal to the amount allotted to the 
State under subsection (c).
    (c) Allotments.--From the amounts appropriated under subsection (a) 
for each fiscal year, the Secretary of the Treasury shall allot an 
amount to each of the States on the basis of the relative population of 
each such State, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury on the 
basis of the most recent decennial census.
    (d) Use of Funds.--Funds received under this section may be used 
only to supplement State operating budgets and may not be used to 
supplement State capital budgets.
    (e) Effective Date.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall make 
payments to States under this section for fiscal year 2011. The 
Secretary of the Treasury shall make payments to States under this 
section for fiscal year 2012 not later than one year following the 
payments for fiscal year 2011 under this section.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Operating budget.--The term ``operating budget''--
                    (A) means the annual spending plan for the 
                recurring expenses of a State, including salaries, 
                equipment, and repairs; and
                    (B) does not include expenses to build or acquire 
                permanent infrastructure.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the several 
        States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 
        Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, 
        the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Trust 
        Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any other territory or 
        possession of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 01-16

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired judges of the Court may be recalled by

the Chief Judge when furtherservice is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William P. Greene, Jr.,

having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired judge. The Chief

Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Greene would provide substantial service

necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective February 1, 2016, recall-eligible retired Judge William P. Greene,

Jr., is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). Judge Greene shall

have and exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active service and

shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. It is

further

ORDERED that Judge Greene shall serve in recalled status in this calendar year to review

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court, and to perform other substantial

service at the request of the Chief Judge, and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up

to 90 days or its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Greene's service may be extended beyond 90

days. 

DATED: February 1, 2016 BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence B. Hagel

LAWRENCE B. HAGEL

Chief Judge
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of Tier Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”), for the period ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald Johnston, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to his knowledge:







1.
            This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
  amended.






2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  February
      9, 2009
            /s/
      Ronald W. JohnstonRonald
      W. JohnstonChief
      Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

          - [A-570-836] 

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of antidumping duty administrative review. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Commerce (“the Department”) is extending the time limit for the preliminary results of a new shipper review of glycine from the People's Republic of China (”China”). This review covers one Chinese producer, Nantong Dongchang Chemical Industry Corp. (“Nantong”), for the period March 1, 1999 through August 31, 1999. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

April 17, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Maria Dybczak at (202) 482-5811; Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20230. 

## The Applicable Statute 

Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (”the Act”) by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”). 

## Postponement of Preliminary Results 

                        The Department has determined that it is not practicable to issue its preliminary results of the administrative review within the original time limit of April 29, 2000.                         *See Decision Memorandum from Edward C. Yang, Office Director to Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III,*                         April 7, 2000. The Department is extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results until June 28, 2000 in accordance with Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.                     

The deadline for the final results of this review will continue to be 90 days after the signature date of the preliminary results. 

Dated: April 7, 2000. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Group III. 

[FR Doc. 00-9560 Filed 4-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
bv-ex1025_615.htm



Exhibit 10.25

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

BRIGHTVIEW HOLDINGS, INC.

2018 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

WHEREAS, the BrightView Holdings, Inc. 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by BrightView Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and became effective on June 27, 2018; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 20 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) is authorized to amend the Plan at any time and for any reason; and

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan, in the manner set forth in paragraph 1 below.

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below.


	
 
	
1.
	
Section 8(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following, new Section 8(a):




Unless a Participant withdraws from the Plan as provided in Section 10 of the Plan, his or her option for the purchase of shares of Common Stock will be exercised automatically on the Exercise Date, and the maximum number of full shares subject to the option will be purchased for such Participant at the applicable Purchase Price with the accumulated Contributions from his or her account. No fractional shares of Common Stock will be purchased; any Contributions accumulated in a Participant’s account, which are not sufficient to purchase a full share will be returned to the Participant. Any other funds left over in a Participant’s account after the Exercise Date will also be returned to the Participant. During a Participant’s lifetime, a Participant’s option to purchase shares hereunder is exercisable only by him or her. 


	
 
	
2.
	
The Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all other respects.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-50010 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOEL BERMUDEZ-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

__________________ No. 96-50218 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUIS MANUEL NEVAREZ-PUENTES, a/k/a Samuel Navarro-Puentes, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-95-CR-300-ALL USDC No. EP-95-CR-518

- - - - - - - - - August 13, 1996 Before KING, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *2

In this consolidated appeal, Joel Bermudez-Reyes and Luis Manuel Nevarez-Puentes appeal their sentences for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. They argue, based on their interpretation of an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43), that their prior convictions were not aggravated felonies because these convictions occurred before the effective date of the 1990 amendments to the immigration laws. The issue is foreclosed by United States v. Garcia-Rico , 46 F.3d 8, 9-10 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 2596 (1995). Nevarez-Puentes argues that his prior conviction which resulted in a five-year suspended sentence is not an aggravated felony under § 1101(a)(43) because his probation for that sentence was revoked and he served a one-year prison sentence. We conclude that the district court correctly determined that the prior conviction was an aggravated felony. See United States v. Vasquez-Balandran , 76 F.3d 648, 649-51 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.
Order entered Octo ber 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00687

- CR

CHRISTY ALLANE RODRI GUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 064768



### O RDER

On September 8, 2015, this Court struck the Anders brief filed by counsel in support of
his motion to withdraw because it did not comply with the requirements of Anders v. California
and its progeny. We ordered appellan t to file an amended brief within thirty days. The Court now has before it counsel’s October 7, 2015 motion seeking a thirty

- day extension of time to file
the amended brief, citing his caseload as the basis for the requested extension.

We GRANT the motion and ORDER counsel to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date
of this order, either an Anders brief that adequately addresses all of the issues identified above or
a brief raising issues on the merits. No further extensions will be granted.

We ORDER We DIREC T the Clerk to send copies of this order to counsel for all
parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
N E W S  R E L E A S E

For immediate release                             For more information, contact:
                                                   Dorothy Botnick, HydroChem
                                                   713-462-2130
                                                   Dennis Sheets, Valley Systems
                                                   330-854-4526


                 HYDROCHEM TO ACQUIRE VALLEY SYSTEMS OPERATIONS


HOUSTON,  September 9, 1998 -- HydroChem  Industrial  Services,  Inc. and Valley
Systems,  Inc.  announced  today that  HydroChem  will  acquire  all of Valley's
operational  assets.  The  transaction  is subject to  finalizing  schedules and
exhibits to the  definitive  agreement,  completing  due diligence and obtaining
regulatory and stockholder  approval.  The purchase price is approximately $29.8
million,   plus  the   assumption  of  Valley's  bank  debt  and  certain  other
liabilities.  The companies expect to conclude the acquisition during the fourth
quarter of this year.

         Valley Systems  (NASDAQ:VALE),  based in Canal Fulton,  Ohio,  provides
specialized  industrial  cleaning services,  primarily ultra high pressure water
jetting,  metal  cutting  and vacuum  services,  to the  primary  metals,  power
generation,  chemical,  plastics, and petroleum refining industries. The company
employs  approximately  350 people and  services  customers  from 18  locations.
Revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998, was $24.4 million.

         "Valley Systems' experienced people,  specialized service offerings and
'blue  chip'  customer  base  complement   HydroChem's  growth  extremely  well,



<PAGE>

particularly  our  near-term  geographic  expansion  plans,"  said  Tom  Carter,
HydroChem  chairman  and  chief  executive  officer.    "With  these  additional
resources,  HydroChem  is  well  positioned  to  remain  a  leading  provider of
industrial cleaning services."

     Ed Strickland, president of Valley Systems, said, "Customers and cemployees
of both  companies  will benefit  greatly from the broader range of services and
greater  financial  resources  made  possible by combining  HydroChem and Valley
Systems."

     HydroChem,  based in Houston,  has almost  1,900  employees  and 50 offices
throughout the U.S. and in Singapore.  The company provides  industrial cleaning
services, including hydroblasting, chemical cleaning and vacuum services, to the
petrochemical,  oil  refining,  electric  utility,  pulp and  paper  and  metals
industries.


                                      #####
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-57664) of Third Wave Technologies, Inc. pertaining to the 1995
Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1997 Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan, 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1999 Incentive Stock Option
Plan, 1999 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, 2000 Stock Plan and 2000 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 31, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Third Wave Technologies, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 27, 2003                          /s/  Ernst & Young LLP