alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10634]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Design Arts Section (Creativity, 
Organizational Capacity, and New Public Works categories) to the 
National Council on the Arts will be held on May 31-June 1, 2001, in 
Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20506. A portion of this meeting, from 11:00 a.m. to 
12:00 p.m. on June 1st, will be for policy discussion and will be open 
to the public. The remaining portions of the meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 
6:00 p.m. on May 31st and from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. 
to 5:00 p.m. on June 1st, will be closed.
    The closed portions of these meetings are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the 
determination of the Chairman of May 12, 2000, these sessions will be 
closed to the public pursuant to (c)(4)(6) and (9)(B) of section 552b 
of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels that are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-
5691.

    Dated: April 23, 2001.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 01-10634 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10790

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICKEY SCOTT BESSETTE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:12-CR-423-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rickey Scott 

Bessette has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bessette has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10790 Document: 00513012567 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-10790

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-10790 Document: 00513012567 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARCOS MARRUFO, ADRIANA

MARUFFO, DONNA J. KELLY, AND

ROBERT E. HEDICKE

,

A ppellants,

V. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 164

- CV

Appeal from the

County C ourt at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND

JOHN TRIEN

,

Appellees. §

§

§ (TC# 2011DCV05390 )

MEMO RANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of

prosecution. Finding that the Appellants’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want

of prosecution.

On August 6 , 201 4 , the Clerk notified Appellant s that t he i r brief was past due and no

motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised the parties that the Court

intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellants responded within ten

days and showed grounds for cont inuing the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1). Neither the

brief nor a motion for extension of time in which to file the brief has been filed. Pursuant to

Rules 38.8(a)(1) of t he Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss the appeal for want of- 2

-

pro secution.

September 3, 2014

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J. (Not Participating)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 15-08

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), and in order to meet the needs of the Court, recalleligible retired Judge Kenneth B. Kramer, is recalled to perform substantial service to theCourt. The

Court requires Judge Kramer's service to assist in reviewing and deciding an unprecedented number

of appeals now pending before the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective January 5, 2009, Kenneth B. Kramer, shall commence service

as a judge of the Court for a period of 90 days.

DATED: December 30, 2008 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ William P. Greene, Jr.

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Stephen R. Wright, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc.

|Dated:
September 25, 2008 |  | /s/ Stephen R. Wright           
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|                          |  | General Manager, Chief Executive
|                          |  | Officer, Chief Financial Officer
|                          |  | and Secretary                   
|                          |  | (Principal Executive Officer and
|                          |  | Principal Financial Officer)    



---
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Stratus      Services Group, Inc.**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. Section 1350)**

| 1.     | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | the                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Dated:                May 10, 2007 |                                                 |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | By:                /s/ Joseph J. Raymond             |
|                               | Joseph                J. Raymond                     |
|                               | Chairman                of the Board of Directors,   |
|                               | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 40416 Conference Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Christian Adrian Reyes

- Hernandez,
Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:20

- CR

- 298

- 1

Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christian Adrian Reyes

- Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes

- Hernandez has not filed a

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 2, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40416 Document: 00515884665 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2021No. 20

- 40416

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from fur ther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2

. As noted by counsel, the written judgment omits the placement recommendation agreed to at sentencing. Accordingly, we REMAND for the limited purpose of correcting the cleric al error in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. Case: 20-40416 Document: 00515884665 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000201511
<NAME> COMPUTER RESEARCH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         766,823
<SECURITIES>                                 1,996,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                  751,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                     43,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,608,608
<PP&E>                                       2,619,122
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,064,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,202,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          655,466
<BONDS>                                        134,826
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,230
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,447,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,202,917
<SALES>                                        188,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,778,518
<CGS>                                          148,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,357,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                407,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                   146,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            261,822
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   261,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Enrique Aviles, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lane, J.), rendered April 9, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Niehoff, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Equity Office Properties Trust, the general partner of EOP Operating Limited
Partnership (the Company), each hereby certifies that to his / her knowledge,
on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                                                         

|                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                    | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  | /S/ RICHARD D. KINCAID                                                                                                                                            
|                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                   
|                      |  | Richard D. KincaidPresident and
Chief Executive Officer of
Equity Office Properties Trust,
the general partner of EOP
Operating Limited Partnership               
|                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                   
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  | /S/ MARSHA C. WILLIAMS                                                                                                                                            
|                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                   
|                      |  | Marsha C. WilliamsExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Equity Office Properties Trust,
the general partner of EOP
Operating Limited Partnership
Instructions, Form 315

December 1, 2017

ORDER CONFIRMING PLAN

General Information

Official Form 315 is used in chapter 11 cases to confirm a plan of reorganization. This 

form, while legally sufficient for its purpose is often simply a starting point for the drafting of a 

longer order containing additional provisions applicable to the particular case. Although issued 

in the name of the court, the Order Confirming Plan normally will be drafted by the attorney for 

the debtor or other plan proponent. The additional provisions in a proposed confirmation order 

are subject to objection and may be the focus of extensive negotiation among the parties in 

interest. All provisions in the order also are further subject to approval by the judge.

Applicability of Rule 9009(a)

Rule 9009(a) provides that “[t]the Official Forms prescribed by the Judicial Conference 

of the United States shall be used without alteration, except as otherwise provided ... in the 

national instructions for a particular Official Form.” 

Alterations may be made to this form.
Exhibit 13.2

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of sanofi-aventis, a French
société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual
report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 3, 2009



By:

/s/ Laurence DebrouxLaurence DebrouxSenior Vice President Chief Financial Officer(1)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to sanofi-aventis and will be retained by sanofi-aventis and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|(1) | Principal financial officer.
|--- | ----------------------------



1
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. No. 35,293 4 ADAM CEPELAK, 5 Defendant-Appellant, 6 and 7 LINDA D. CEPELAK ; ESTATE OF LINDA 8 D. CEPELAK ; UNKNOWN HEIRS, 9 DEVISEES , AND LEGATEES OF LINDA 10 D. CEPELAK , UNKNOWN TENANT, and 11 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , 12 Defendants. 13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 14 John F. Davis, District Judge 15 Rose, Little, Brand & Associates, PC 16 Eraina Edwards 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Plaintiff-Appellee 192 JRSPC, LLC 1 Joshua R. Simms 2 Albuquerque NM 3 for Defendant-Appellant 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION 5 VIGIL, Chief Judge. 6 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 7 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 8 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 9 {2} Affirmed . 10 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 11

_______________________________ 12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 13
WE CONCUR: 14

___________________________________ 15 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 16

___________________________________ 17 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 18
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                               |   |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  January 19, 2012 | /s/ David K. Young                 |   |
|                              | David K. Young                     |   |
|                              | President, Chief Operating Officer |   |

| Date:  January 19, 2012 | /s/ Brent E. Timmons                                  |   |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                              | Brent E. Timmons                                      |   |
|                              | Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6477 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear for women covering 

the ankle. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2010 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear 

for women covering the ankle. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN COV4 ERING THE ANKLE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6477 IH

‘‘ 9902.64.01 Work footwear for women 

with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, incorporating a protective toe 

cap of materials other 

than metal, covering the 

ankle, but not higher than 

6′′ (provided for in subheading 6403.91.90.15) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2012 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS