alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6449 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6449

  To repeal provisions of the recently enacted health care reform law 
that prohibit preexisting condition exclusions or other discrimination 
                   based on health status for adults.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2010

 Mr. Ackerman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal provisions of the recently enacted health care reform law 
that prohibit preexisting condition exclusions or other discrimination 
                   based on health status for adults.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fourth Health Insurance Protects 
America--Can't Repeal IT (HIPA-CRIT) Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROHIBITION OF PREEXISTING 
              CONDITION EXCLUSIONS OR OTHER DISCRIMINATION BASED ON 
              HEALTH STATUS FOR ADULTS.

    The provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(Public Law 111-148), insofar as such Act prohibits under section 
2704(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-3(a)) a group 
health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual 
health insurance coverage from imposing any preexisting condition 
exclusion with respect to such plan or coverage with respect to 
enrollees who are 19 years of age or older, are hereby repealed, 
effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 24(d)

                   Power of Attorney for Joseph F. Keeler, Jr.


         Know all men by these presents that the undersigned director of Metatec
Corporation, a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and
appoints Jeffrey M. Wilkins and Julia A. Pollner, and each of them (with full
power to each of them to act along), as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for me and in my
name, place, and stead, in my capacity as director of the Company, to execute
the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31,
1997, and for each fiscal year thereafter, and any amendments thereto, and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as
fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of
them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.


/s/ J.F. Keeler, Jr.                              Director
------------------------------                    ------------------------------
Signature                                         Position(s) with the Company


J.F. Keeler, Jr.
------------------------------
Print Name


February 4, 1998
------------------------------
Date of Execution
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-30509A; FRL-6778-3]


Pesticide Product; Corn Rootworm Registration Application; 
Correction

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  In the Federal Register of March 19, 2001 (66 FR 15435) (FRL-
6771-5), EPA announced receipt of an application from Monsanto Company 
to register a pesticide product containing a new active ingredient not 
included in any previously registered products pursuant to the 
provisions of section 3(c)(4) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 
and Rodenticide Act. On page 15436, second column, first full 
paragraph, last sentence, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico was 
inadvertently omitted from the proposed planting locations. The 
sentence is corrected to read ``Plantings are proposed for the states 
of California, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, 
Nebraska, South Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico.'' This notice announces the correct proposed planting 
sites.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  By mail: Mike Mendelsohn, 
Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (703) 308-8715; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81ece4efe5e4edf2eee9efafece8eae4c1e4f1e0afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ef828a818b8a839c808781c18286848aaf8a9f8ec1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.


    Dated: April 5, 2001.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of 
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 01-10437 Filed 4-25-01 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-01-016]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# TIME AND DATE:

May 3, 2001 at 11 a.m. 

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436 Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# STATUS:

Open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agenda for future meeting: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-702 (Review) (Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium from Russia)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on May 15, 2001.) 

5. Inv. No. 731-TA-888-890 (Final) (Stainless Steel Angle from Japan, Korea, and Spain)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on May 11, 2001.) 

6. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: April 24, 2001.

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10509 Filed 4-24-01; 12:59 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 10, 2019

p0904

Order 

Clerk

September 10, 2019

158016

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158016

COA: 342469

Kent CC: 17-008485-FC

JAMES ANTHONY BURNS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of October 30, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2018 

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Ames (Docket No. 156077). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been denied in 

Ames on June 26, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered, and it 

is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Patrick G. Blanchard, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on form 10-Q of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8618 and 34-52492]c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 14, 2006                     /s/ Patrick G. Blanchard   Patrick G. Blanchard   President and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 19, 2016

s0816

Order 

Clerk

August 19, 2016

153938

KIMBERLY HUTCHISON, f/k/a KIMBERLY

LEADBETTER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153938

COA: 332503

Wayne CC: 06-628047-DM

THOMAS LEADBETTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2016 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Danielle Terry, Appellant.

Weiss, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.), rendered September 28, 1988, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging her with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree — specifically, cocaine. The terms of the plea agreement called for a sentence of 2 *Vi*to *IV2*years’ imprisonment. At sentencing, however, defense counsel implored County Court to consider imposing a more lenient sentence, emphasizing that the presentence report recommended a term *823of probation. The court declined the request stating, in substance, that it was bound by the terms of the plea agreement. Defendant was thereafter sentenced in accordance with the plea bargain.

On this appeal, defendant urges that we reduce the sentence in the interest of justice since this is her first offense, she is the 21-year-old mother of three children and she is the victim of a cocaine addiction. Instead, however, we are required to vacate the sentence imposed due to County Court’s failure to exercise its independent discretion at sentencing *(see, People v Graybosch,*139 AD2d 664; *People v Montoya,*138 AD2d 528). It is fundamental that a court retains discretion to impose an appropriate sentence notwithstanding the terms of a plea agreement and must exercise that authority *(see, People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302). As such, the case must be remitted to County Court for resentencing. Given the procedural posture of this case, should County Court deem a more lenient sentence appropriate, the People must be accorded an opportunity to withdraw their consent to the waiver of indictment *(see,*CPL 195.10 [1] [c]; *cf., People v Farrar, supra,*at 307-308).

Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed, and matter remitted to the County Court of Rensselaer County for resentencing. Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6282 

To repeal Public Law 107–40. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Ms. LEE of California (for herself, Mr. JONES, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. KUCINICH, 

Mr. PAUL, Mr. HONDA, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. STARK, Mr. 

ELLISON, and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal Public Law 107–40. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repeal of the Author5 ization for Use of Military Force’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDING. 

7 Congress finds that the Authorization for Use of Mili8 tary Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), 

9 signed into law on September 18, 2001, has been used 

10 to justify a broad and open-ended authorization for the 

11 use of military force and such an interpretation is inconVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:21 Oct 08, 2010 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6282.IH H6282

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6282 IH

1 sistent with the authority of Congress to declare war and 

2 make all laws for executing powers vested by the Constitu3 tion in the Government of the United States. 

4 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF PUBLIC LAW 107–40. 

5 Effective 180 days after the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act, the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

7 (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby re8 pealed. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21000-21001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: May 8, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 21001]]

    Place: Embassy Suites, Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Rd., 
Wisconsin at Western Ave., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Richard J. Bartlett, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, Natcher Bldg./Bldg. 45, Room 5As37B, (301) 594-
4952.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10352 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M]
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R OB ER TO HER

RER A, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. HUU NGUYEN; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 14-16371 D.C . No. 1:12-c v-01565-SKO M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia She ila K. Obe rto, M a g istra

te Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d June 22, 2015 *** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . C a lifornia sta te prisone r R obe rto He rre ra a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismi ssing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c t ion a lle g ing de libe rate 

# F IL ED JUL 01 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** He rre ra

c o nse nte d to proc e e d be fore a m a gistra te judge . Se e28 U.S.C . § 636(c ).

* ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).indiffe re nc e to his se rious m e dic a l ne e ds a nd re ta lia tion. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wfor an a buse of disc re t ion thedistric t c ourt’ s dism issa l for fa ilure to c om p ly with a c ourt orde r, Pagtalunan v. Galaza , 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th C ir. 2002), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

dism i ssing He rre ra ’ s a c tion without pre

judic e a fte r He rre ra

fa ile d to file a

le gible am e nde d ple a ding in c om plia nc e with theloc a l rule s, de spite be i ng wa rne d tha t fa i lure to do so c o uld re sult in dism

issa l . Se e E.D. C a l. R . 130(b) (doc um e nts file d with thec ourt m ust be pre se nte d le gibly); Pagtalunan , 291 F.3d a t 640, 642-43 (disc

ussing thefive fa c t ors for de te rm ining whe the r to dismiss a c a se for fa ilure to c om

ply with a c ourt orde r and noting tha

t dismissa l should not be

disturbe d a bse nt “ a de finite an d firm c onvic tion” tha

t the distric t c ourt “ c om

m itte d a c le ar e rror of judgm e nt” (c ita tion and inte rna l quota

tion m a rks om itte d)). B e c a use we a ffirm

the distric t c ourt’ s dismi ssa l for fa ilure to c o m ply with a c ourt orde r, we do not c o n side r He rre ra ’ s c ha lle n ge to the distric t c o urt’ s orde r dism issing his first a

m e nde d c om

pla int. Se eAl–Tork

i v . K ae mpe n , 78 F.3d 1381, 1386 (9th C ir. 1996) (inte rloc utory orde rs c annot be a

ppe a le d a fte r a

dism issa l for fa ilure to prose c ute , e ve n if the fa ilure is ne glige nt or due to a m ista ke ). AFFIRM E D. 2 1 4 - 1 6 3 7 1
**EXHIBIT
          32.1**
 **CLICKABLE
          ENTERPRISES, INC.**
 **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Nicholas Cirillo, Jr., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.




*Date: April
                  11,2008**/s/
                  Nicholas
                  Cirillo, Jr.**Nicholas
                      Cirillo, Jr.**President (Principal
                  Executive
                  Officer)*


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.