alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kyoko Malhado, Appellant, v Mauro P. Cordani, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (DiTucci, J.), dated February 22, 1988, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment by confession entered November 17, 1986, and declared the underlying promissory note void.

Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is denied, without prejudice to the right of the defendant to commence a plenary action.

A person seeking to vacate a confession of judgment and judgment entered thereon must commence a plenary action for that relief *(see, Burtner v Burtner,*144 AD2d 417; *Affenita v Long Indus.,*133 AD2d 727, 728; *Wilk v Cohen,*131 AD2d 466). Therefore, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendant’s motion without prejudice to his right to commence an action seeking to set aside the confession of judgment and to vacate the judgment entered thereon. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IMPROVENET
INC'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          54,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,753
<PP&E>                                           3,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,269
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,353
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,311
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,892)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.17)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Sanofi (No. 333-165418, No. 333-157685, No. 333-149203, No. 333-145074, No. 333-139555,No. 333-125490 and No. 333-121584), and the Registration Statement on Form F-3 and related Prospectus of Sanofi (No. 333-187156) of our reports dated March 10, 2015 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 20-F.   Neuilly-sur-Seine, France   March 10, 2015   PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit   /s/ Xavier Cauchois
#### Evelio SANDOVA-GRIJALVA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71103.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2011.*

Filed April 26, 2011.

Evelio Sandova-Grijalva, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Aric Allan Anderson, Trial, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Evelio Sandova-Grijalva, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Even if Sandova-Grijalva’s asylum application was timely, substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that his incident with the guerrillas did not rise to the level of persecution. *See Gu v. Gonzales,*454 F.3d 1014, 1019-21 (9th Cir.2006) (brief detention, beating and interrogation did not compel a finding of past persecution). In addition, given the changed country circumstances in Guatemala, and Sandova-Grijalva’s inability to explain why anyone would be interested in him now, substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that petitioner has not established a well-founded fear of persecution. *779*See Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.2003) (“[T]he IJ and the BIA are entitled to rely on all relevant evidence in the record, including a State Department report, in considering whether the petitioner has demonstrated there is good reason to fear future persecution.”). Therefore, his asylum claim fails.

Because Sandova-Grijalva failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily fails to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).

Additionally, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Sandova-Grijalva failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to Guatemala. *See Arteaga v. Mukasey,*511 F.3d 940, 948-49 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, his CAT claim fails.

Finally, because Sandova-Grijalva did not exhaust his due process claim, this court lacks jurisdiction to review it. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004) (alleged error of lack of opportunity to present case was procedural in nature and required to be exhausted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Submitted on record and brief September 25, 1998,

affirmed February 17,

petition for review denied April 29, 1999 (328 Or 465)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*VICTORIA LYNN SIMMS, *Appellant.*

(95C22112; CA A90873)

974 P2d 788

D. Olcott Thompson filed the briefs for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State ex rel Caleb v. Beesley,*326 Or 83, 949 P2d 724 (1997); *State ex rel Huddelston v. Sawyer,*324 Or 597, 932 P2d 1145, *cert*den _ US _, 118 S Ct 557, 139 L Ed 2d 399 (1997); *State v. Ferman-Velasco,*157 Or App 415, 971 P2d 897 (1998).
/**
 * @file
 * Recaptcha v3 behaviors.
 */

(($, Drupal) => {
  function updateTokenElement(element) {
    let timer;
    // Wait for grecaptcha to be loaded.
    if (typeof grecaptcha === 'undefined') {
      timer = setInterval(() => {
        if (typeof grecaptcha !== 'undefined' || !element) {
          clearInterval(timer);

          if (element) {
            doUpdateTokenElement(element);
          }
        }
      }, 500);
    }
    else {
      doUpdateTokenElement(element);
    }
  }

  function doUpdateTokenElement(element) {
    let $element = $(element);

    grecaptcha.ready(() => {
      if (!element) {
        return;
      }

      grecaptcha.execute($element.data('recaptchaV3SiteKey'), {
        action: $element.data('recaptchaV3Action')
      }).then((token) => {
        $element.val(token);
        $element.trigger('change');
      });
    });
  }

  /**
   * Attach recaptcha response token from google with form.
   *
   * @type {{attach: Drupal.behaviors.reCaptchaV3.attach}}
   */
  Drupal.behaviors.reCaptchaV3 = {
    attach: (context) => {
      once('recaptcha-v3-token', '.recaptcha-v3-token', context).forEach(
        (element) => {
          let interval;

          updateTokenElement(element);

          // Update the recaptcha tokens every 90 seconds.
          // This seems to be the most robust way to always have valid recaptcha
          // tokens when you don't have control over how the forms are being
          // submitted. For example normal form submits are synchronous while
          // Google Recaptcha v3 is asynchonous.
          // A recaptcha token has a maximum lifetime of 120 seconds.
          // https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/docs/v3
          interval = setInterval(() => {
            if (!element) {
              clearInterval(interval);
            } else {
              updateTokenElement(element);
            }
          }, 90000);
        }
      );
    }
  };
})(jQuery, Drupal);
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeff Criswell, President of Cyberads, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

This  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB/A  of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  June 7, 2006
                                          /s/ JEFF CRISWELL
                                          ----------------------
                                          Jeff Criswell
                                          President
#### LOEW v. CHRIST.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June, 1896.)

Action by Edward V. Loew, administrator, etc. against Sebastian Christ.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 38 N. Y. Supp. 1146, and 40 N. Y. Supp. 1144.
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 02-8003

IN RE DARRYL SMITH, ATTORNEY AT LAW

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and IVERS and GREENE, Judges

O R D E R

On April 22, 2002, the Court of Appeals of Maryland issued an order disbarring on consent

attorney Darryl J. Smith, the respondent, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for

commingling and misappropriation of client funds.

On July 9, 2002, the Court ordered the respondent to show cause, within 30 days thereafter,

why he should not be disbarred from practice before this Court as reciprocal discipline, pursuant to

Rule 7(d) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice. The respondent was advised that a failure

to respond to the order would be deemed to be consent to such disbarment. The respondent has not

responded to the order.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 7(d)(3), it is

ORDERED that Darryl J. Smith is disbarred from practice before this Court.

DATED: October 18, 2002 PER CURIAM.
|SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION


CERTIFICATION


(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002)


In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
of Hydrogenics Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Pierre Rivard, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director, of the Company, certify, that:


(1)                 the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)                 the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
By:
/s/ Pierre Rivard       


Name: Pierre Rivard


Title: President, Chief
Executive Officer and Director


Date: May 20, 2004
A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will be
retained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford K. Bown, certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security International, Inc. for the quarter ended on
June 30, 2010, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ Clifford K. Bown                                
|Clifford K. Bown                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|August 6, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21156-21157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10491]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-3164-EM]


Maine; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Maine, (FEMA-3164-EM), dated March 20, 2001, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 16, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Maine is hereby amended to include the following area 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration 
of March 20, 2001:


[[Page 21157]]


Hancock County for emergency protective measures (Category B) under 
the Public Assistance program for a period of 48 hours.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Robert J. Adamcik,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-10491 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Last revised (Transmittal 14-013) March 18, 2019 

Guide to Judiciary Policy 

Vol. 14: Procurement 

Ch. 3: Purchasing Methods 

Appx. 3C: Determination and Findings for Time and Materials and 

Labor Hour GSA FSS Orders 

Title of Effort: ________ [Title of the statement of work or requirement] 

GSA FSS Contract Number: _______________ [GSA FSS contract number] 

Agency Order Number: _______________ [Judiciary order number]

Contracting Officer Information: __________ [Name, position title]

Description of Effort: ___________ [Brief description of the type of supplies/services 

to be acquired]

Total Estimated Cost: _______________ [Estimated dollar amount and type of funds] 

1. A fixed price order is not suitable for this order because it is not possible, at the time 

of award of this order, to accurately estimate the extent or duration of the work or 

anticipated costs with any reasonable degree of confidence. 

2. The following market research methods were used to make this determination. 

3. The current requirement has been structured to maximize the use of fixed-price 

orders by [limiting the value or length of the time-and-materials/labor-hour order; and/or 

establishing fixed prices for portions of the requirement].
Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 14, Appx. 3C Page 2 

4. On future acquisitions for the same or similar requirements, the judiciary CO plans to 

maximize the use of fixed-price orders by [limiting the value or length of the time-andmaterials or labor-hour order; and/or establishing fixed prices for portions of the 

requirement). 

5. Prior to an increase in the ceiling price of a time-and-materials or labor-hour order, 

the judiciary CO must: 

 Conduct an analysis of pricing and other relevant factors to determine if the 

action is in the best interest of the Government and document the order file; 

 Follow the procedures in Guide to Judiciary Policy, Volume 14, § 310.50.63 

(Limiting Sources on Orders Placed under Federal Supply Schedules) for a 

change that modifies the general scope of the order; and 

 Comply with the requirements in Guide, Volume 14, § 310.50.30 (Inclusion of 

Items Not on Schedule) when modifying an order to add open market items. 

Determination and Findings for 

Time and Materials and Labor Hour GSA FSS Orders 

Based upon the findings above, I determine that the use of __________ [time-andmaterials; or labor-hour] contract type for this order is in the judiciary’s best interest. 

I prepared the determination and find it adequate for approval. 

Signature: ________________________________ Date: ____________________ 

Typed name: __________________________________________________________ 

Contracting Specialist/Officer______________________________________________ 

I reviewed the determination and find it adequate for approval. 

Signature _______________________________ Date: _____________________ 

Typed name: __________________________ Branch Chief: ____________________
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bode Xu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  December 28, 2011





/s/ Bode XuBode Xu, Principal Financial and Accounting

Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald A. Goer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                         /s/ Donald A. Goer
                                                         -----------------------

                                                         Donald A. Goer

                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                                         Date: December 29, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.