alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick C. Shutt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Jim
McDevitt, the Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 19, 2009



By:

/s/ Patrick C. ShuttPatrick C. Shutt, Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Jim McDevittJim McDevitt, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000915 29-OCT-2014 08:46 AM
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6180 

To amend the conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 

to promote the conservation and improvement of the soil, water, and 

wildlife resources of lands containing muck soils, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2010 

Mr. HALL of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the conservation provisions of the Food Security 

Act of 1985 to promote the conservation and improvement of the soil, water, and wildlife resources of lands 

containing muck soils, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MUCK SOILS CONSERVATION. 

4 Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 is amend5 ed by inserting after section 1240R (16 U.S.C. 3839bb– 

6 5) the following new section: 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6180 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 1240S. CONSERVATION OF LAND CONTAINING MUCK 

2 SOILS. 

3 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary 

4 of Agriculture shall carry out a conservation program 

5 under which the Secretary makes payments to assist own6 ers and operators of eligible land specified in subsection 

7 (b) to conserve and improve the soil, water, and wildlife 

8 resources of such land. 

9 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE LAND.—To be eligible for inclusion 

10 in the program established under this section, the land 

11 must— 

12 ‘‘(1) be comprised of soil that qualifies as 

13 muck, as determined by the Secretary; 

14 ‘‘(2) be used for production of an agricultural 

15 crop; 

16 ‘‘(3) have a spring cover crop planted in con17 junction with the primary agricultural crop referred 

18 to in paragraph (2); 

19 ‘‘(4) have a winter crop planted; and 

20 ‘‘(5) have ditch banks seeded with grass that is 

21 maintained on a year-round basis. 

22 ‘‘(c) PAYMENT AMOUNTS.—The Secretary may pro23 vide payments of not less than $300, but not more than 

24 $500, per acre per year under the program. 

25 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

26 are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6180 IH

1 out the program $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 

2 and 2012.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-25-2000             MAR-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-28-1999             JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999             SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                           2,333                   2,333
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,930                  53,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,478                   1,478
<INVENTORY>                                     50,890                  50,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,426                 109,426
<PP&E>                                          32,990                  32,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,017                  13,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,480                 186,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,578                  43,578
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          6                       6
<COMMON>                                           105                     105
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   186,480                 186,480
<SALES>                                        165,768                  85,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,768                  85,253
<CGS>                                          111,559                  57,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,612                  20,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,052                   1,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,545                   6,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,561                   2,601
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,984                   3,983
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.65                    0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62                    0.36


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21111-21112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 413, 433, 438, 463, 464, 467, and 471

[FRL-6971-6]
RIN 2040-AB79


Extension of Comment Period on the Proposed Effluent Limitations 
Guidelines, Pretreatment Standards, and New Source Performance 
Standards for the Metal Products and Machinery Point Source Category

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Extension of comment period on proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 3, 2001 (66 FR 424), EPA proposed effluent 
limitations guidelines and pretreatment standards for wastewater 
discharges associated with the operation of new and existing metal 
products and machinery facilities. The original comment period was 120 
days, ending on May 3, 2001. The

[[Page 21112]]

comment period will now end 60 days later on July 2, 2001.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule will be accepted through July 2, 
2001.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to Mr. Michael Ebner, Office of 
Water, Engineering and Analysis Division (4303), U.S. EPA, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 if by mail and to Mr. 
Michael Ebner, U.S. EPA, 401 M St., SW., Room 611 West Tower, 
Washington, DC 20460 if by hand delivery. Comments may also be sent via 
e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#016c716c2f626e6c6c646f7572416471602f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bed3ced390ddd1d3d3dbd0cacdfedbcedf90d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>. Please submit any references cited in 
your comments. EPA requests an original and three copies of your 
comments and enclosures (including references). Commenters who want EPA 
to acknowledge receipt of their comments should enclose a self-
addressed, stamped envelope. No facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Ebner at (202) 260-5397 or 
Ms. Shari Barash at (202) 260-7130.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the public record for the final MP&M 
regulation, EPA will respond to comments from the 1995 Phase I proposal 
as well as the current proposal. Therefore, comments submitted on the 
Phase I rule do not need to be resubmitted in response to today's 
action.

    Dated: April 17, 2001.
Diane C. Regas,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Water.
[FR Doc. 01-10511 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000888 01-JUL-2015 07:50 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6125 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6125

           For the relief of Nery Antonio Velasquez-Roblero.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2010

Mr. Pastor of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           For the relief of Nery Antonio Velasquez-Roblero.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR NERY ANTONIO VELASQUEZ-
              ROBLERO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Nery Antonio Velasquez-
Roblero shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Nery Antonio Velasquez-Roblero enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Nery Antonio Velasquez-
Roblero, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Nery Antonio 
Velasquez-Roblero shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 24.5
POWER OF ATTORNEY
     The undersigned, a director of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., herebyconstitutes and appoints Stephen J. Tomassi and Gregory D. Waller, or either ofthem, his true and lawful attorneys and agents, each with full power andauthority to act as such without the other, to do any and all acts and thingsand to execute any and all instruments which either one of said attorneys andagents may deem necessary or advisable to enable said Corporation to complywith the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), as amended; and includingspecifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, full power and authorityto each of said attorneys and agents to sign the name of the undersigned to theForm 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, and anyamendment(s) thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to the requirements of the Act, the undersigned hereby ratifying andconfirming all that said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and delivered thesepresents as of the 15th day of December 2003.     /s/ WILLIAM E.B. SIARTWilliam E. B. Siart
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                    ----------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Walter Tatum, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Cyberads, Inc. (the "company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
u.s.c. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the sarbanes-oxley
act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 13, 2005
                                          /s/ WALTER TATUM
                                          ----------------------
                                          Walter Tatum
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Form 10-K of Southern Union Company (the “Company”) for the
        year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George L. Lindemann, Chairman
        of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act
        of 1934, as amended, except as otherwise noted under Item 9A therein, and
        (ii)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
   
   /s/
        GEORGE L. LINDEMANN
  George
        L.
        Lindemann
 Chairman
        of the Board, President and
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 March
        1,
        2007
  
  This
        Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
        incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
        Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
        whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
        general incorporation language contained in such filing.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
        the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32(1)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John F. Welch, Chief Executive Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ John F. Welch
-----------------------------------
John F. Welch
Chief Executive Officer

                                       44
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Ko, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Balbach, J.), rendered December 5, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s objection to the court’s charge on alibi has been raised for the first time on this appeal; therefore, this claim is not preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Mayas,*126 AD2d 574, *lv denied*69 NY2d 1006). In any event, the refusal by the court to employ the wording in the charge urged by the defendant, to wit, "even if you disbelieve each and every one of the alibi witnesses who testified, the presumption of innocence about which I’ve talked to you still exists”, was not error. In its charge, the court stressed that the defendant had no burden to prove that he was not the person who committed the crime, but that this burden rested with the People. The court also charged that the People were required to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. These instructions adequately demonstrated the People’s burden *(see, People v Wintje,*68 NY2d 637).

The defendant argues that the performance by the court interpreter was so inadequate as to deprive him of his constitutional right of confrontation. Prior to the trial, the court determined that the interpreter was an official court interpreter who had acted in that capacity in the past. No objection was raised during the trial as to the adequacy of the translation during either direct or cross-examination. The matter, therefore, has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *cf., People v Rolston,*109 AD2d 854). Furthermore, the defendant has made no record of any serious error in translation that would provide a basis for reversal *(see, People v Rolston, supra).*

The defendant further contends that the prosecutrix exceeded the bounds of propriety in her summation. The record demonstrates that when the court sustained the defendant’s objections, the defendant did not request any further curative *851instructions. In another instance, when the defendant’s objection was not ruled on, the defendant did not press his objection. In fact, that statement, to which the defendant objected, was fair comment on evidence elicited by the defense during cross-examination.

The prosecutrix did misstate information about a visit to one of the witnesses by two Orientals. The record did not support her statement. While this was a misstatement, it is not of such moment as to require a reversal. Standing by itself, this comment did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial *(see, People v Roopchand,*107 AD2d 35, *affd*65 NY2d 837).

We have reviewed the remaining contention raised by the defendant and find it to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Weinstein, Hooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.