[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21853-21855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2001-NM-115-AD; Amendment 39-12215; AD 2001-09-10]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series 
Airplanes Equipped With Pratt & Whitney Model PW4400 Series Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
(AD), applicable to all McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes 
equipped with Pratt & Whitney Model PW4400 series engines, that 
currently requires revising the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to advise 
the flight crew of applicable operational limits. This amendment 
corrects a typographical error in one paragraph of the existing AD that 
resulted in a reference to an incorrect engine fan blade which is not 
subject to the requirements of that paragraph. The actions specified in 
this AD are intended to ensure that the flight crew is informed of 
applicable limitations in airplane performance, and to prevent reduced 
acceleration and climb performance relative to performance data in the 
AFM, which could result in the airplane overrunning the end of the 
runway during takeoff or landing, or impacting obstacles or terrain. 
This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.

DATES: Effective May 17, 2001.
    Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
before July 2, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2001-NM-115-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232. 
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e67733f303373373f2c3d3133333b302a1e383f3f70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="370e1a56595a1a5e564554585a5a5259437751565619505841">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must 
contain ``Docket No. 2001-NM-115-AD'' in the subject line and need not 
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached 
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or 
ASCII text.
    Information pertaining to this amendment may be examined at the 
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip C. Kush, Aerospace Engineer, 
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; 
telephone (562) 627-5263; fax (562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 3, 2001, the FAA issued AD 2001-07-
08, amendment 39-12173 (66 FR 18527, April 10, 2001), applicable to all 
McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes equipped with Pratt & 
Whitney Model PW4400 series engines. That AD requires revising the 
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to advise the flight crew of applicable 
operational limits. That action was prompted by the FAA's finding that 
the operational limits specified in the Limitations Section of the AFM 
for McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes equipped with Pratt 
& Whitney Model PW4400 series engines do not adequately list the 
performance correction sections in the AFM; and reports that Pratt & 
Whitney Model PW4400 series engines with certain early-production fan 
blades (Phase 0/1, FB2B), as installed on certain McDonnell Douglas 
Model MD-11 series airplanes, do not produce the amount of thrust 
indicated in the AFM. The actions required by that AD are intended to 
ensure that the flight crew is informed of applicable limitations in 
airplane performance, and to prevent reduced acceleration and climb 
performance relative to performance data in the AFM, which could result 
in the airplane overrunning the end of the runway during takeoff or 
landing, or impacting obstacles or terrain.

Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule

    Since the issuance of AD 2001-07-08, the FAA has found a 
typographical error in paragraph (b) of that AD. Paragraph (b) requires 
a revision of the Performance Section of the AFM to address a shortfall 
in the amount of thrust produced by certain engines equipped with 
certain early-production fan blades. That paragraph states that it 
applies to ``airplanes with Pratt & Whitney Model PW4460 or PW4462 
engines with FB2C [fan blades]

[[Page 21854]]

installed.'' (Though the existing AD referred to the subject parts as 
``fans,'' the correct term in this case is ``fan blades.'') Although 
FB2C fan blades do exist, these fan blades are not subject to the 
unsafe condition addressed by paragraph (b) of AD 2001-07-08. The 
correct model number for the fan blades subject to paragraph (b) is 
``FB2B.'' (The preamble of AD 2001-07-08 correctly identifies the 
affected fan blades subject to the unsafe condition, where it states, 
``Pratt & Whitney Model PW4400 series engines with certain early-
production fan blades (Phase 0/1, FB2B) `` do not produce the amount of 
thrust indicated in the AFM.'')
    The FAA finds that this typographical error could result in 
airplanes subject to the thrust-shortfall condition not being subject 
to the AFM revision required by paragraph (b) of the existing AD. For 
operators of McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes with Pratt 
& Whitney Model PW4460 or PW4462 engines with FB2B fan blades 
installed, failure to incorporate the AFM revision in paragraph (b) of 
the existing AD could lead to reduced acceleration and climb 
performance relative to performance data in the AFM, which could result 
in the airplane overrunning the end of the runway during takeoff or 
landing, or impacting obstacles or terrain.

Explanation of Requirements of Rule

    Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
exist or develop on other airplanes of this same type design, this AD 
supersedes AD 2001-07-08 to continue to require revising the AFM to 
advise the flight crew of applicable operational limits. This new AD 
revises paragraph (b) of the existing AD to refer to the correct fan 
blades. Except for this change in the applicability of paragraph (b) of 
this AD, all requirements remain the same as those in the existing AD.

Determination of Rule's Effective Date

    Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior 
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
needed.
    Submit comments using the following format:
    <bullet> Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a 
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the 
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
    <bullet> For each issue, state what specific change to the AD is 
being requested.
    <bullet> Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each 
request.
    Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
to Docket Number 2001-NM-115-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped 
and returned to the commenter.

Regulatory Impact

    The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it 
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-12173 (66 FR 
18527, April 10, 2001), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
(AD), amendment 39-12215, to read as follows:

2001-09-10  McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-12215. Docket 2001-NM-
115-AD. Supersedes AD 2001-07-08, Amendment 39-12173.

    Applicability: All Model MD-11 series airplanes equipped with 
Pratt & Whitney Model PW4400 series engines, certificated in any 
category.
    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To ensure that the flight crew is informed of limitations in 
airplane performance, and to prevent reduced acceleration and climb 
performance relative to performance data in the Airplane Flight 
Manual (AFM), which could result in the airplane overrunning the end 
of the runway during takeoff or landing, or impacting obstacles or 
terrain, accomplish the following:

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2001-07-08

AFM Revision: Limitations Section

    (a) Within 30 days after April 25, 2001 (the effective date of 
AD 2001-07-08, amendment 39-12173), revise Section 1, Limitations, 
of the FAA-approved AFM to include the following information under 
Subsection 3, Operational Limits. This may be accomplished by 
inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM.


[[Page 21855]]


    ``Required Performance Corrections in Section 4A or 4B must be 
applied as applicable.''

New Requirements of this AD

AFM Revision: Performance Section 4A or 4B

    (b) For airplanes with Pratt & Whitney Model PW4460 or PW4462 
engines with FB2B fan blades installed: Within 30 days after the 
effective date of this AD, revise the Performance Section of the 
FAA-approved AFM to include the following information under Section 
4A or 4B, as applicable. This may be accomplished by inserting a 
copy of this AD into the AFM.

    ``When operating with one PW4460 engine, one PW4462 engine 
(operated at PW4460 thrust rating), or one PW4462 engine installed, 
apply the following performance corrections:
    Weight must be reduced by:

    Takeoff--1.3%
    Enroute--2.5%
    Landing--1.3%

    When operating with more than one PW4460 engine and/or PW4462 
engine (operated at PW4460 thrust rating), or more than one PW4462 
engine installed, apply the following performance corrections:
    Weight must be reduced by:

    Takeoff--2.5%
    Enroute--2.5%
    Landing--2.5%.''

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an 
appropriate FAA Principal Operations Inspector, who may add comments 
and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.

    Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.

Special Flight Permits

    (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

Effective Date

    (e) This amendment becomes effective on May 17, 2001.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 24, 2001.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-10723 Filed 5-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>