alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (849)
<INVENTORY>                                     46,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,366
<PP&E>                                          58,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,678
<BONDS>                                        280,559
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           40,172
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                   (130,966)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,462
<SALES>                                         72,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,101
<CGS>                                           46,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       650
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,403)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Charles A Vehlow, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Metal Storm Limited; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

Date: July 15, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6088 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6088

     To provide for temporary alternative State ``on'' and ``off'' 
 indicators under the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation 
                  Act of 1970, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 10, 2010

 Ms. Shea-Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for temporary alternative State ``on'' and ``off'' 
 indicators under the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation 
                  Act of 1970, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SPECIAL RULES.

    Effective with respect to any weeks that begin during the period 
beginning on August 1, 2010, and ending on September 30, 2011, a State 
may by law provide that section 203 of the Federal-State Extended 
Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note) be applied 
as if--
            (1) subsection (b)(1)(B) of such section had been amended 
        by substituting ``first'' for ``fourteenth''; and
            (2) subsection (f) of such section had been amended--
                    (A) by substituting ``6 percent'' for ``6.5 
                percent''; and
                    (B) by repealing clause (ii) of paragraph (1)(A) 
                thereof.

SEC. 2. CERTIFICATIONS NOT AFFECTED.

    The Secretary of Labor may not, in the case of any State that 
amends its State law in conformance with section 1, withhold 
certification of such State under section 3304 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 if, with respect to the period of time to which such 
certification relates, the Secretary of Labor finds that the State law 
of such State would (disregarding any provisions of such State law as 
in effect or applied in conformance with section 1) otherwise satisfy 
the requirements for certification.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act, the terms ``State'', ``State law'', and 
``week'' have the respective meanings given such terms by section 205 
of the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970.
                                 <all>
```
1The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3830

___________

Harry James Sutton, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

U.S. Probation Office; Timothy M. *

Scharr, U.S. Probation Officer; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Kathleen M. Hawk, Director of Bureau, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: July 26, 2001

 Filed: August 1, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Harry James Sutton appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

dismissal of his action under the Privacy Act, in which he alleged that his presentence

report contained “inaccurate” information. This appeal is frivolous, and therefore we

dismiss it. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Sheppard, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of FIRSTBINGO.COM INC.;

1. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
3. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 7th day of April, 2004.



| | /s/ Thomas Sheppard
Thomas Sheppard
Principal Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------





---
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GoldSpring, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert T. Faber,
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ ROBERT
      T. FABERRobert
      T. Faber
              President
      and Chief Financial Officer





Date:
March 5, 2010
EXHIBIT 99.4

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and  Investor
Protection  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted),  Gary D. Wrench,  the
Chief Financial Officer of OpticNet, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   The  Company's  Annual  Report on Form  10-K/A  for the  period  ended
          September 28, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
          99.4 (the "Annual  Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of
          Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition of the Company at the end
          of the period  covered by the Annual  Report and results of operations
          of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.


Dated: 1/24/03

/s/ Gary D. Wrench
----------------------------------
Gary D. Wrench
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 RULE13a-14(b)/RULE15d-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of Compugen Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I the undersigned, being the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Dr. Anat Cohen-Dayag
 
 Title:           President and Chief Executive Officer
 Date:           March 11, 2010
#### Diane Ramirez, Appellant, v Reginald Smith et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract for failure to provide heat to certain leased commercial premises, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered October 23, 1985, which, after a nonjury trial, *inter alia,*dismissed the complaint and ordered that the plaintiff be evicted from the premises. By order dated March 2, 1987, this court held the appeal in abeyance and directed the appellant to file a proper appendix pursuant to CPLR 5528 and 22 NYCRR 670.17. The appellant has complied.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

*105The Riverhead Community Service Center (hereinafter RCSC) was an unincorporated association. On January 15, 1980, the plaintiff, Diane Ramirez, who was at all relevant times the president of RCSC, allegedly entered into a lease for space at 76 West Main Street, Riverhead (hereinafter the premises) with J. Leo Saxstien, one of the group of trustees who ran the premises. Saxstien died in December 1980. The present action arises out of the defendants’ obligation to provide heat to the premises pursuant to the lease. In their answer, the defendants, *inter alia,*denied the validity of the lease and demanded possession of the premises.

The plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by striking the lease and the plaintiff’s testimony regarding the transaction with Saxstien pursuant to CPLR 4519 (the Dead Man’s Statute). We do not agree *(see, Friedrich v Martin,*294 NY 588). In any event, the defendants presented ample testimony, including that of two expert witnesses who testified that Saxstien’s signature was forged, which established that the lease was not authentic. Thus, any error was harmless *(see, Matter of Lefft,*44 NY2d 915).

The plaintiff’s contention that the scope of the judgment exceeded the court’s oral decision is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 of  Lawrence  Financial  Holdings,  Inc.,  filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (SEC No.  333-57540),  of our report dated
February  23, 2001 on the  consolidated  balance  sheets of  Lawrence  Financial
Holdings,  Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,  and the related  consolidated
statements of income,  comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years then;  which  report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB.



                                        /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

                                            Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 28, 2001
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Rik Deitsch, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10KSB of Nutra Pharma Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which  such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;



3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the financial statements,  and  other  financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  Nutra Pharma Corp. as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;



4. I am  responsible  for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls  and procedures (as such term is  defined  in Regulation  13a-14  of the Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934)  for  Nutra Pharma Corp., and have:



i. Designed such disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that material information  relating  to  Nutra Pharma Corp.,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly  during  the period  in  which  the  periodic  reports  are  being prepared;



ii.  Evaluated  the effectiveness  of  Nutra Pharma Corp.'s disclosure controls  and  procedures  as  of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and



iii. Presented in the report my conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,  to  the Nutra Pharma Corp. auditors and the audit committee of the board  of  directors  (or  persons  fulfilling  the equivalent function):



i. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Nutra Pharma Corp.'s  ability  to record,  process,  summarize  and report financial data and have identified for Nutra Pharma Corp.'s  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in internal controls; and



ii.  Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and



6. I and the other certifying officer  have  indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal  controls  or  in  other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most  recent  evaluation,  including  any  corrective  actions  with regard  to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: April 14, 2004



/s/ Rik Deitsch

__________________________

Rik Deitsch

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00447

- CR

Raul Daniel NORRIS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9017

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED May 29, 2019.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended January 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry R. Welch, in my capacity
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Jerry R. WelchDate:  
      April 1, 2010
            Jerry
      R. Welch
              Chief
      Executive Officer and Director