alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /S/ Jay M. MeilstrupJay M. MeilstrupChief Executive Officer and PresidentSeptember 14, 2005
 26
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              40
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (5)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,011
<PP&E>                                           6,127
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,547
<BONDS>                                          2,567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,099
<OTHER-SE>                                        (818)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,395
<SALES>                                          5,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,014
<CGS>                                            4,092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    115
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (26)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 89
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        89
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, T. Kendall Hunt, certify, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for VASCO Data Security
International, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/ T. Kendall Hunt                                           
|T. Kendall Hunt                                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|November 5, 2010
# GB Temporary Visitor to Guam

On May 8, 2008, the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 (CNRA) extended most provisions of U.S. immigration law to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI). The CNRA created a new Guam-CNMI Visa Waiver Program (VWP) which became effective on Nov. 28, 2009, and replaced the previous Guam Visa Waiver Program.

A noncitizen may be admitted into Guam or the CNMI under the current Guam-CNMI Visa Waiver Program if the noncitizen:
                - Is a national of a country or geographic area listed in 8 CFR § 212.1(q)(2);
                - Can be classified as a visitor for business or pleasure;
                - Is solely entering and staying on Guam or the CNMI for a period not to exceed 45 days;
                - Is in possession of a round trip ticket that is nonrefundable and nontransferable and bears a confirmed departure date not exceeding 45 days from the date of admission to Guam or the CNMI.
                - Is in possession of a completed and signed Guam-CNMI Visa Waiver Information form ( Form I-736, Guam Visa Waiver Program ) (PDF);
                - Is in possession of a completed I-94, Arrival-Departure Record (CBP Form I-94);
                - Is in possession of a valid unexpired ICAO compliant, machine readable passport issued by a country that meets the eligibility requirements of this section;
                - Has not previously violated the terms of any prior admissions. Prior admissions include those under the Guam-CNMI Visa Waiver Program, the prior Guam Visa Waiver Program, the Visa Waiver Program as described in section 217(a) of the INA and admissions pursuant to any immigrant or nonimmigrant visa;
                - Waives any right to review or appeal an immigration officer's determination of admissibility at the port of entry into Guam or the CNMI;
                - Waives any right to contest any action for deportation or removal, other than on the basis of: an application for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the INA; withholding or deferral of removal under the regulations implementing Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; or, an application for asylum if permitted under section 208 of the Act; and
                - If a resident of Taiwan, possess a Taiwan National Identity Card and a valid Taiwan passport with a valid re-entry permit.

For more information about the Guam-CNMI Visa Waiver Programs, see Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Guam-CNMI Visa Waiver Program page.

## Guam Visa Waiver Links

                - Form I-736, Guam Visa Waiver Program (U.S. Customs and Border Protection)
                - Guam Visa Waiver Program (DHS)
                - Guam-CNMI Visa Waiver Program (DHS)

06/24/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent to rule on application. 

# SUMMARY:

This correction revises information from the previously published notice.

In notice document 01-7661 beginning on page 16972 in the issue Wednesday, March 28, 2001, under Supplementary Information, the brief description of proposed project(s) should include “Relocate taxiway A”.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before May 29, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenneth Kroll, AIP/PFC Team Leader, Programming and Planning Branch, FAA Eastern Region Airports Division, 1 Aviation Plaza, Jamaica, New York, 718-553-3357.

Issued by AEA-610, Airports Division, Jamaica, N.Y. on April 18, 2001.

Tom Felix,

Manager, Planning and Programming Branch, Airports Division, Eastern Region.

[FR Doc. 01-10446 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GameTech International,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Jay Meilstrup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/S/
                Jay M. MeilstrupJay
                M. MeilstrupChief
                Executive OfficerMarch
                11, 2008
#### SCHULZ, Respondent, v. ROHE et al., Appellants.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

May 7, 1894.)

Action by Henry Schulz against Charles Rohe and others.

Argued before FREEDMAN and McADAM, JJ.

Deyo, Duer & Bauerdorf, for appellants.

Shaw & Fiske, for respondent.

*1148PER CURIAM.

Under the decision of the general term of this court upon, the former appeal (4 Misc. Rep. 384, 24 N. Y. Supp. 118), and the evidence given by both parties upon the trial now under review, the case was one fertile jury. It was properly submitted, and, upon the whole case, it cannot be held that the verdict is contrary to evidence, or to the weight of the evidence. No reason appears sufficient to call for a disturbance of the verdict. There were no errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 **CLICKABLE
        ENTERPRISES, INC.**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
        2002**


In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Guy
      Pipolo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.




*Date:
                    April
                    11,2008**/s/
                    Guy
                    Pipolo**Guy
                        Pipolo**Chief Financial
                    Officer
                    (Principal Accounting Officer)*


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CLICKABLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Clickable  Enterprises,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Nicholas Cirillo, Jr., President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  August 17, 2004


/s/ Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.
-------------------------
Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.
President
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6379 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6379

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 20 Main Street in Little Ferry, New Jersey, as the ``Sergeant 
                    Matthew J. Fenton Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

  Mr. Rothman of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 20 Main Street in Little Ferry, New Jersey, as the ``Sergeant 
                    Matthew J. Fenton Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT MATTHEW J. FENTON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 20 Main Street in Little Ferry, New Jersey, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Matthew J. Fenton Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Matthew J. Fenton Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         547,660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,597,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                    91,200
<INVENTORY>                                 12,715,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,059,882
<PP&E>                                       9,528,281
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,391,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,247,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,858,503
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,998
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,351,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,247,491
<SALES>                                     54,662,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,662,377
<CGS>                                       33,236,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,997,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,111,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               141,158
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             744,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                428,019
<INCOME-TAX>                                   256,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            171,698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                391,358
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (219,660)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Cynthia Ann Hudson, Appellant

No. 06

- 11

- 00028

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Cass County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2009

- F

- 00005 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no reversible error in the judgment

of the court below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Cynthia Ann Hudson, has adequately indicated h er inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 1 3 , 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         984,321
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,218,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,437,351
<PP&E>                                         513,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                (359,016)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,965,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,831,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                         7,777
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,965,384
<SALES>                                      1,760,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,760,137
<CGS>                                        1,159,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,159,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               516,351
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    76,099
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                 ------------



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer



                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



         In  connection  with this  annual  report on Form 10-K of  Excalibur
         Industries I, Joseph P. Hubert,  Chief Executive  Officer and Principal
         Financial Officer of Excalibur Industries, certify, pursuant to Section
         906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Excalibur Systems.


Date: July 13, 2004                  /s/ Joseph P. Hubert
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Joseph P. Hubert
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principal Financial Officer)
(8 Misc. Rep. 305.)

#### GRAHAM v. MANHATTAN RY. CO.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 17, 1894.)

Carriers—Injury to Passenger—Contributory Negligence.

Plaintiff got on an elevated railroad car, which was so crowded that he could just get standing room on the platform. When the car reached the *740next station, plaintiff got off, but before the car started he went on the platform again, though it was as much crowded as before, and was injured in consequence of its crowded condition. *Held,*that plaintiff was chargeable with contributory negligence.

Appeal from trial term.

Action by Henry Graham against the Manhattan Railway Company for personal injuries. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Appellant’s counsel having argued that the respondent was guilty of negligence, and the appellant was free from it, the court called his attention to the fact that the plaintiff himself testified that when he got on the platform of the car it was so crowded that he could just get standing room on it, and that the respondents’ servants could not get the gates shut; that when he got on at Fifty-Ninth street it was impossible to get in the car; that when the train reached Fifty-Third street and Eighth avenue, he got off the car; that then he was in a place of safety; and that, although the platform was not emptied, but, as he himself testified, he had no more space to stand in than before, he, knowing his danger, voluntarily went on the platform again, and that this was negligence on his part. To which appellant’s counsel replied: “I think the respondents ought to have taken two or three from that platform, and put them over on the platform; they could have closed the gates then. I submit, on the testimony of the witness McCabe, he could have taken the passengers off.”

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

Gilbert D. Lamb, for appellant.

Edward B. Thomas, for respondent.

BOOKSTAVER, J.

We think, on the other hand, it was the plain and manifest duty of the appellant, when he found how dangerous the condition of the platform was, and had reached a place of safety on the Fifty-Third street platform, to wait for the next train, and not put himself where the gates of the car platform could not be shut, or have voluntarily gone upon a platform which he knew was dangerous, and by so doing took the risk which resulted in the injuries received by him. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.