alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of L.J.H., C.B.B., and * From the 29th District

T.L.H., children, Court of Palo Pinto County,

 Trial Court No. C45021.

No. 11-13-00299-CV * March 27, 2014

 * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6494 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6494

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to 
         improve the Littoral Combat Ship program of the Navy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2010

   Mr. Taylor (for himself, Mr. Akin, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Wittman, Mr. 
Kagen, Mr. Bonner, and Mr. Stupak) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to 
         improve the Littoral Combat Ship program of the Navy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP PROGRAM.

    (a) Contract Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 121 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
111-84; 123 Stat. 2190) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``ten Littoral Combat Ships and 15 
                Littoral Combat Ship ship control and weapon systems'' 
                and inserting ``20 Littoral Combat Ships, including any 
                ship control and weapon systems the Secretary 
                determines necessary for such ships,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``a contract'' and inserting ``one 
                or more contracts''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``liability to'' and 
        inserting ``liability of''.
    (b) Technical Data Package.--Subsection (b)(2)(A) of such section 
is amended by striking ``a second shipyard, as soon as practicable'' 
and inserting ``another shipyard to be built to a design specification 
for that Littoral Combat Ship''.
    (c) Limitation of Costs.--Subsection (c)(1) of such section is 
amended by striking ``awarded to a contractor selected as part of a 
procurement'' and inserting ``under a contract''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(2)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John F. Corcoran, Chief Financial Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John F. Corcoran
--------------------

John F. Corcoran
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                                       46
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

August 4, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40170

Summary Calendar

JESSE JESUS SOLIZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NANNETT HASSETT; JERRY BATEK; JOHN GILMORE; LINDA HARRISON; OSCAR

SOLIZ; PATRICK MCGUIRE; LARRY OLIVAREZ; DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; CHAIRMAN TEXAS BOARD

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-02-CV-437

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesse Jesus Soliz, Texas prisoner #496252, appeals from the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous, for failure

to state a claim, and for seeking relief against immune defendants.

Soliz challen ges his state habeas corpus proceedings and his

transfer to the state prison system following revo cation of his

parole. Soliz moves to supplement the record; his motion is

DENIED.2

Soliz contends that he was deprived of access to the courts by

the actions of the state trial court during state habeas corpus

proceedings. Defects in state habeas corpus procedures “do not

constitute grounds for relief in federal court.” T revino v.

Johnson , 168 F.3d 173, 180 (5th Cir. 1999).

Soliz contends that he was deprived of his right of access to

trial counsel and of his right to communicate with the outside

world by being transferred to the custody of the state prison

system. Soliz had no constitutionally protected right to

incarceration in any particular facility. S ee Olim v. Wakinekona

,

461 U.S. 238, 244-45 (1983).

Soliz contends that the d istrict court erred by failing to

make any findings regarding his claim that defense counsel and the

prosecutor conspired to prosecute him maliciously. Soliz states

that his civil rights were violated by the two defendants, but does

not allege facts or argue law to support that proposition. Soliz

has failed to brief the issue for appeal. B rinkmann v. Dallas

County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Soliz’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.

Howard v. King

, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Soliz is

warned that the dismissal of his complaint counts as a strike for

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) an d that the dismissal of his

ap peal counts as a second strike. A depegba v. Hammons

, 103 F.3d

383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). When Soliz accumulates three strikes3

he will not be allowed to bring a civil action or appeal a judgment

in forma pauperis unless he is “under imminent danger of serious

physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6237 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1351 2nd Street in Napa, California, as the 

‘‘Tom Kongsgaard Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6237 RFS

1 SECTION 1. TOM KONGSGAARD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1351 2nd Street in Napa, Cali4 fornia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tom 

5 Kongsgaard Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tom Kongsgaard Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Active Power, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David S. Gino, Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15d, as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David S. GinoDavid S. GinoVice President, Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)October 27, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PDF Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2009 (the "Report"), I, John K. Kibarian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |                                                                                                          
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ JOHN K. KIBARIAN John K. Kibarian President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:
March 16, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
     from Floridino's International Holdings, Inc. June 30, 2000
     financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
     reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000

<CASH>                                                        53,273
<SECURITIES>                                                  392,869
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 51,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   111,516
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              558,829
<PP&E>                                                        2,193,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                                2,368,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                3,278,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,519,648
<BONDS>                                                       1,132,749
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      7,757
<OTHER-SE>                                                    779,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  3,278,756
<SALES>                                                       1,040,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               1,065,712
<CGS>                                                         719,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 1,198,061
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            342,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (661,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (851,850)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (661,618)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (0.9)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.9)



</TABLE>
#### SCHECKER, Appellant, v. WOOLSEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by William H. Schecker against Edward J. Woolsey. A. B. Cruikshank, for appellant. W. W. Culver, for respondent.

No opinion. Order modified by allowing service of answer as proposed, and affirmed as modified, without costs.
ifsl1012gex4-1.htm


    Exhibit 4.1

    
      

      

    


    
      
        	
                NUMBER

                *000*

                 

              	
                NOT
      VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS
      OF THE STATE OF

                 

                Nevada

                 

                 

              	
                SHARES

                *000*

                CUSIP
      NO.   451600  10  0

              


      

      	
              Ideal
      Financial Solutions, Inc.

              AUTHORIZED
      COMMON STOCK:
      [           ]
      SHARES

              PAR
      VALUE: $.001

            


       

      	
              This
      Certifies that   

            	Specimen
	
               

               

              Is That Record Holder
      Of      

            	Specimen


      	
               

              Shares of IDEAL FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS,
      INC. Common
      Stock

            
	
              transferable
      on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly
      authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly
      endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid countersigned by the
      Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

               

              Witness the facsimile seal of
      the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized
      officers.

            
	
              Dated:________________

            
	
              Secretary: /s/

            	
              President:  /s/

            


       

      
        	NOT
      VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT	 	
                Countersigned
      & Registered

                Nevada
      Agency and Trust Company

                50
      West Liberty Street ∙ Suite 880 ∙ Reno, Nevada 89501

              	
                    
      By:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________
No. 95-60236

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIE FRANK JONES, BILLY RAY GRAY, SYLVESTER BYERS and ANTHONY C. MARION,

Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Mississippi

(3:94-CR-36-D)

______________________________________________

April 10, 1996

Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

After considering the briefs and argument of counsel and the

record, the Court finds no reversible error and therefore affirms

the convictions and sentences of the appellants.

The only contention of appellants deserving any discussion is

that respecting contac ts with jurors. After receiving the jury

note concerning this, the distric t court examined each of the2

jurors individually and ascertained that these matters wo uld not

have an effect on their deliberations and they could continue to be

impartial. The jury was also given appropriate formal instructions

in this respect. Appellants complain of certain asserted

deficiencies in the district court’s examination of the jurors, and

that the trial court did not allow them to call the jurors to

testify at a post-verdict motion for new trial hearing. We are not

persuaded that any reversible error is shown. We note that the

trial court’s pre-verdict in camera examination of the jurors was

pursuant to and as contemplated by the express request of defense

counsel. The nature of the two contacts was neither expressly nor

impli edly threatening or promissory, and was relatively mild and

vague (a defendant was a “good” person whom the juror could

“help”); although expressly on behalf of one particular defendant,

the contacts did not suggest that that defendant, or any other

defendant, had instigated or knew of the contacts; and neither of

the two contacts was face-to-face. Moreover, the evidence against

the defendants was overwhelming.

The appellants’ convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-383-027]

Take notice that on April 20, 2001, Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI) tendered for filing with the Commission the following tariff sheets for disclosure of a recently negotiated transaction with Penn Virginia Oil & Gas Corporation.

Original Sheet No. 1415

Sheet Nos. 1416-1499

DTI states that copies of its letter of transmittal and enclosures have been served upon  DTI's customers and interested state commissions.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm*.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10741  Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350**
  **As
Adopted Pursuant to**
  **Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Pingchuan Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhang,
Chunman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:
 
 (2)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
April 15,
2005 By:
/s/ Zhang, Chunman
 Zhang,
Chunman
 Chief
Financial Officer
<Page>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)
of Lazare Kaplan International Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
August 19, 2004, included in the 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders of Lazare
Kaplan International Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 333-40225 and No. 333-92077) pertaining to the Lazare Kaplan
International Inc. 1997 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan and Post-Effective
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-52303) pertaining to
the Lazare Kaplan International Inc. 401(k) Plan for Savings and Investment of
our reports dated August 19, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Lazare Kaplan International Inc. and subsidiaries
included and/or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)
for the year ended May 31, 2004.


                                         Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
March 24, 2005