alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shuwen Kang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 2, 2012



| | /s/ Shuwen Kang                         
| | ----------------------------------------
| | Shuwen Kang, Principal Executive Officer
#### People v Newnon Flax.

Motion to extend time to *1016take appeal denied as untimely *(see,*CPL 460.30 [1]). Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6092 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6092

     To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act to allow 
  recreational fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass in the Block Island 
                          Sound transit zone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 10, 2010

    Mr. Bishop of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act to allow 
  recreational fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass in the Block Island 
                          Sound transit zone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECREATIONAL FISHING FOR ATLANTIC STRIPED BASS IN THE BLOCK 
              ISLAND SOUND TRANSIT ZONE.

    Section 9 of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 
5158) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Recreational Fishing in Block Island Sound Transit Zone.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary shall not prohibit fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass 
        in the Block Island Sound transit zone.
            ``(2) Exception.--This subsection does not limit the 
        authority of the Secretary to establish seasonal or other 
        temporary limitations on fishing that are specifically 
        necessary for the conservation and management of Atlantic 
        striped bass.
            ``(3) Block island sound transit zone defined.--In this 
        subsection the term `Block Island Sound transit zone' means the 
        area of the exclusive economic zone within Block Island Sound, 
        north of a line connecting Montauk Light, Montauk Point, New 
        York, and Block Island Southeast Light, Block Island, Rhode 
        Island; and west of a line connecting Point Judith Light, Point 
        Judith, Rhode Island, and Block Island Southeast Light, Block 
        Island, Rhode Island.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Joseph J. Raymond, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of StratusServices Group, Inc., (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge the foregoing Quarterly Report of the Company:

 

1.                                       fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and;

2.                                       the informationcontained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  February 13, 2003 |   | By:    | /s/ Joseph J. Raymond                 |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                           |   |   | Joseph J. Raymond                     |
|                           |   |   | Chairman of the Board of Directors,   |
|                           |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
Exhibit 31.2
------------

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             and Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427

I, Xiaogang Zhu, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China Natural Gas, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;

      c) disclosed in this report any change in registrant's internal control
over financial reporting the occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 16, 2007                              /s/ Xiaogang Zhu
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Xiaogang Zhu
                                                  Principal Accounting Officer
China Packaging Technologies, Inc. - Exhibit 10.14 - Filed by
   newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.14 

Form of Purchase Agreement 

(English Summary) 

	Parties to Contract 	
                         Hangzhou
      Shengming as Buyer , Anhui Shanying Paper Ltd. and Ma’anshan Tianfu Paper
      Products Co., Ltd. as Vendor 

	  	
       

	Name of Products 	
                     
         B2-1 

	  	
       

	Brand 	
                     
         Anhui Shanying Paper Ltd. 

	  	
       

	Standard of Model 	
                     
         120g 

	  	
       

	Producer 	
                     
         Anhui Shanying Paper Ltd. 

	  	
       

	Unit 	
                     
         ton 

	  	
       

	Time of Purchase 	
                         The
      Buyer fax the purchase-plan to the Vendor 7 days before the Purchase and
      the request will be proceeded after the Vendor’s acknowledgement. The two
      parties will consult with special situations. 

	  	
       

	Location of 	
                     
         In the factory of the Buyer 

	Purchase 	
       

	 	
       

	Transportation 	
                         By
      vehicle, the Buyer consigns the task to the Vendor and the Vendor will pay
      the transportation. 

	  	
       

	Time limit of payment 	
                         Monthly
      payment at 45 days 

	 	
       

	Governing Law 	
                     
         Chinese Contract Law 

	  	
       

	Payment 	
                         A
      part of the products are provided by Ma’anshan Tianfu including invoices.
      The payment will be made to Shanying. 

	  	
       

	Others 	
                         The
      price of products will change with market conditions and any change will
      be approved by the two parties.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10007]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Tuesday, May 1, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-10007 Filed 4-18-01; 2:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________



### m 01-40013

_______________



### J ENNIFER 

### C AREY 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS R EPRESENTATIVE OF
THE E STATE OF G ARY A NTHONY C ARY , D ECEASED , AND AS N EXT F RIEND OF D ANIEL A NTHONY C AREY AND L EE R ICHARD C AREY AND G ARY M ARTIN J OHN C AREY ; 

### A NNE 

### C AREY 

### ; R OLAND 

### L EE 

### B RUMLEY 

### , Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS



### S UB 

### S EA 

### I NTERNATIONAL 

### , I NC 

### .; S UB 

### S EA 

### O FFSHORE 

### , L TD 

### .; M OBIL 

### C ORPORATION 

### ; M OBIL 

### N ORTH 

### S EA 

### , L TD 

### .; C OOPER 

### C AMERON 

### C ORPORATION 

### ; C OOPER 

### C AMERON 

### (U.K.), L TD 

### ., Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

_________________________

February 11, 20022

Before S MITH

and D E M OSS , Circuit Judges, and D UPLANTIER , District Judge. *

P ER C URIAM :

The plaint iffs appeal

an injunction preventing them

from taking certain actions in state court. We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of

co unsel. We conclude that the district court plainly had jurisdiction. That

cour t did not abuse its discretion and commi t ted no reversible error in entering the injunction pursuant to the rel i ti gati on exception to the Anti-Injunction Act.

The ord er granting the injunction is AFFIRMED. We decline to award fees or costs for vexatious litigation o r frivolous appeal.

* District Judge of the Eastern Dis trict of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,742
<SECURITIES>                                    34,319
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                       181
<INVENTORY>                                        620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,195
<PP&E>                                           6,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,308
<BONDS>                                            200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,522
<SALES>                                          9,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,623
<CGS>                                            2,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  19
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                       700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,256
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 99-106

RAYMOND GALLEGOS, APPELLANT,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and FARLEY and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

In an August 11, 2000, opinion, this Court reversed a December 1998 Board of Veterans'

Appeals (Board or BVA) decision denying an earlier effective date (EED) for an October 1997 award

of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) service connection for the appellant's post-traumatic stress

disorder (PTSD). Gallegos v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 50, 51 (2000). The basis for the Court's action

was its reversal of the Board's determinations (1) that the appellant had not filed a Notice of

Disagreement (NOD) as to a 1994 decision of a VA regional office that had denied the appellant's

August 1993 claim for VA service connection for his PTSD and (2) that, because that decision had

thus become final and was not on appeal to the Board at the time of its December 1998 decision, an

EED based on the August 1993 claim could not lawfully be awarded. Id. at 51-52, 58. The Court

held that "insofar as [38 C.F.R.] § 20.201 [(1999)] may be interpreted as adding a requirement of an

expression of a desire for BVA review, we hereby invalidate it"; concluded that an October 1994

letter from the appellant's representative, the Disabled American Veterans (DAV), constituted an

NOD; and remanded the matter for proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. Id. at 57-58.

 

The Secretary subsequently appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

(Federal Circuit). On March 15, 2002, the Federal Circuit reversed this Court's decision; the Federal

Circuit held that this Court had "erred when it invalidated [38 C.F.R.] § 20.201 [(1999)] with regard

to the requirement that an NOD contain 'terms that can be reasonably construed as . . . a desire for

appellate review'", and remanded for this Court to determine the question "whether Mr. Gallegos's

1994 DAV letter constitutes a valid NOD under § 20.201". Gallegos v. Principi, 283 F.3d 1309,

1315 (Fed. Cir. 2002). 

On consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the appellant file, and

serve on the Secretary, a supplemental brief on the above NOD question in light of the Federal

Circuit's opinion. The amicus curiae in the appeal to the Federal Circuit may also file a supplemental

brief within the time afforded the appellant. It is further
ORDERED that the Secretary, not later than 20 days after service of the appellant's

supplemental brief, file, and serve on the appellant, a supplemental response. 

DATED: July 12, 2002 PER CURIAM.
<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Korina  Houghton,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of Coyote Ventures Corp. for the year ended August 31,
2002  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Coyote  Ventures  Corp.


                                By:       /s/ Korina  Houghton
                                          ----------------
                                Name:     Korina  Houghton
                                Title:    Chief  Financial  Officer

                                Date:     December  13,  2002
•

Order entered November 28, 2012

In The



# Court of Zfppeat5 fifth Micarict of Memo at 1113attacs

No. 05-12-01359-CV CITY OF MCKINNEY, Appellant

V. HANK'S RESTAURANT GROUP, L.P., Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-03124-2012



## ORDER The Court has before it appellee's November 26, 2012 unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief of appellee. The Court GRANTS 

### the motion and ORDERS appellee 

### to file its brief by November 29, 2012.

MOLLY FRA IS JUSTICE
(October 20, 1987)

#### Alfonso Barrios et al., Respondents-Appellants, v James *575Klein et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Order and judgment (one paper) (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered March 4, 1987 in Supreme Court, New York County, which, *inter alia,*denied defendants’ motion to strike the complaint and dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3126, granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment awarding them possession of the subject residential loft premises, and dismissed all of plaintiffs’ remaining claims, unanimously modified, on the law, only to the extent of reinstating plaintiffs’ claims for use and occupancy and attorney’s fees and remanding the matter for determination of those issues and, as so modified, the order and judgment (one paper) is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Plaintiffs’ more than five-year occupation of the premises as prime lessees, the limited duration of the sublease and the intended temporary nature of their move to Chile clearly establish that, during the period from September 15, 1981, the date of the original sublease, to February 25, 1983, when plaintiffs purchased the premises pursuant to a cooperative conversion plan, the subject premises were plaintiffs’ primary residence, and that plaintiffs’ tenancy was not illusory *(see, Matter of Avon Furniture Leasing v Popolizio,*116 AD2d 280, 284, *lv denied*68 NY2d 610).

The second sublease having expired by its terms on March 14, 1985, plaintiffs are entitled to use and occupancy for the period of defendants’ holdover tenancy, and the parties’ stipulation as to the amount of such use and occupancy was without prejudice to any claims of the parties. Thus, plaintiffs’ claim for use and occupancy should be reinstated and remanded for determination. Likewise, pursuant to the terms of plaintiffs’ proprietary lease which were incorporated in the second sublease, plaintiffs are entitled to attorney’s fees, and a remand is necessary to determine the reasonable amount of such fees. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6438 

To provide for the adjustment of status for certain long-term conditional 

residents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2010 

Mr. GRIFFITH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the adjustment of status for certain longterm conditional residents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

5 (8 U.S.C. 1255) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(n) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS FOR ALIEN ENTRE8 PRENEURS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland 

10 Security shall adjust the status of an alien described 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6438 IH

1 in paragraph (2) to that of an alien lawfully admit2 ted for permanent residency if the alien— 

3 ‘‘(A) applies for such adjustment; 

4 ‘‘(B) is physically present in the United 

5 States on the date on which the application for 

6 such adjustment is filed; 

7 ‘‘(C) is admissible to the United States as 

8 an immigrant (except as provided in paragraph 

9 (3)); and 

10 ‘‘(D) pays the standard fee for applicants 

11 for adjustment of status under this section. 

12 ‘‘(2) ALIENS ELIGIBLE FOR ADJUSTMENT OF

13 STATUS.—An alien is described in this paragraph if 

14 the alien— 

15 ‘‘(A) became a conditional resident under 

16 this section as an alien entrepreneur, alien 

17 spouse, or alien child (as such terms are defined 

18 in section 216A(f)) on or before December 31, 

19 1998; 

20 ‘‘(B) filed an application to remove his or 

21 her conditional resident status on an I–829 

22 form on or before December 31, 2000, in ac23 cordance with section 216A; and 

24 ‘‘(C) had such form or a motion to reopen 

25 or reconsider the denial of such form pending 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6438 IH

1 before the Department of Homeland Security as 

2 of the date of the enactment of this subsection. 

3 ‘‘(3) WAIVER OF CERTAIN GROUNDS FOR INAD4 MISSIBILITY.— 

5 ‘‘(A) INAPPLICABLE PROVISIONS.—Para6 graphs (5) and (7)(A) of section 212(a) shall 

7 not apply to an adjustment of status under this 

8 subsection. 

9 ‘‘(B) PERMISSIBLE WAIVERS.—The Sec10 retary of Homeland Security may waive any 

11 other provision of section 212(a) (except for 

12 paragraphs (2)(C) and (3)) with respect to an 

13 adjustment of status under this subsection— 

14 ‘‘(i) for humanitarian purposes; 

15 ‘‘(ii) to assure family unity; or 

16 ‘‘(iii) if such waiver is otherwise in the 

17 public interest.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS