[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 10670 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:07

- cv - 01156

- JBT

JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus ANDREW P. SMITH, Captain, sued in his/her individual capacity, MICHAEL RILEY, Sergeant, sued in his/her individual capacity, J. L. SILCOX, Sergeant, sued in his/her individual capacity, W. GODWIN, T. A. FOWLER, Sued in his/her individual capacity, et al., Defendants

- Appellees, T. KENNEDY, Sergeant, sued in his/her individual capacity, et al., Defendants.

Case: 17-10670 Date Filed: 08/22/2018 Page: 1 of 32 ________________________ Appeal from the Un ited States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( August 22, 2018 ) Before TJOFLAT , WILSON, and JULIE CARNES , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: James Logan, a Florida state prisoner, brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against certain correcti onal officers and prison staff. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, and Logan now appeals pro se. On appeal, Logan claims that the district court erred by excluding evidence of his other trials; d enying his motion for a new trial ; and refusing to grant him a continuance prior to trial. Because Logan has failed to provide the trial or pretrial transcripts, and because we cannot meaningfully review his claims without them, we affirm.
Fed eral Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(b)(2) requ ires that “[i] f the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, the appellant must include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant t o that finding or conclusion .” See also 11th Cir.
R. 10

– 1. While we construe pro se pleadings liberally, even pro se appellants are required to provide hearing transcripts when challenging evidentiary rulings on appeal. Loren v. Sasser , 309 F.3d 1296, 1301, 1304 (11th Cir. 2002) ( per curiam)

.

Case: 17-10670 Date Filed: 08/22/2018 Page: 2 of 33 When we cannot meaningfully review an issue on appeal without consulting a hearing transcript that an appellant has failed to submit, we must affirm the district court’s decision. Id

. On appeal, Logan has failed to file the transcripts for his pre trial hearings or his trial proceedings, despite challenging the district court’s decision s made during those proceedings

. We cannot meaningfully review his claims without the transcript s . W ithout the transcript s , we cannot determine what Logan’s arguments in favor of admitting certain evidence were or the district court’s basis for denying his motion

. Likewise, we cannot evaluate Logan’s arguments that the jury’s decision was against the great weight of the evidence without being able to determin e what evidence was presented. Finally, as to Logan’s argument that the district court erred by denying his request for a continuance, the record does not reveal when and where he requested such a continuance. Assuming he made the request at a pretrial h earing, we are again unable to review his argument without the transcripts. Consequently , we must affirm. Id. at 1304

. AFFIRMED. Case: 17-10670 Date Filed: 08/22/2018 Page: 3 of 3