alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sanding Tao, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the small business issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (this "report");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: June 17, 2005


By: /s/ Sanding Tao
-------------------------------
Sanding Tao

Chief Financial Officer
#### BATHMANN v. BATHMANN et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

July 13, 1894)

Receivers—Appointment—Action for Partition.

In an action for partition a receiver will not be appointed on the ground that one of defendants was in possession of the premises, and refused to account for the rents, where such defendant denies that any demand had ever been made for an accounting, and expresses her willingness to account at any time, and there is no evidence that she had acted improperly, or that she was unable to respond to any claim of the moving party.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by Glaus Bathmann against Catharine Bathmann and others. From an order appointing a receiver, plaintiff and defendant Catharine Bathmann appeal.

Reversed,

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT and BARRETT, JJ.

*960Samuel Campbell, for appellant.

Rabe & Keller, for respondent.

VAN BRUNT, P. J.

This action was brought for the partition of certain real estate in the city of New York; and one of the defendants, the owner of a small interest therein, made this motion for the appointment of a receiver upon the grounds that the defendant Catharine Bathmann was in possession of, and collected the rents of, the premises sought to be partitioned, and refused to account for the same. The defendant Catharine Bathmann denied •ever having had any demand made upon her for an account of the rents, and expressed her willingness to render such account at any time, and to pay over the share of the moving defendant. The court thereupon made an order appointing a receiver, and both the plaintiff and the defendant Catharine Bathmann appealed therefrom.

There seems to have been no ground whatever for the appointment. The allegation of a refusal to account was expressly denied, and there is no evidence whatever that the defendant Catharine Bathmann has acted with impropriety, or that she is unable to respond to any claim of the moving defendant; and it is rather a peculiar feature that the only person who complains is the respondent, the owner of a very small interest in the estate sought to be partitioned. There does not seem to be any ground whatever for the intervention of the court, and the order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur..
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6399 

To improve certain administrative operations of the Office of the Architect 

of the Capitol, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2010 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To improve certain administrative operations of the Office 

of the Architect of the Capitol, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONSOLIDATION OF STAFF POSITIONS. 

4 (a) CONSOLIDATION.—Section 108 of the Legislative 

5 Branch Appropriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 1849) is 

6 amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 108. The Architect of the Capitol may fix the 

8 rate of basic pay for not more than 32 positions at a rate 

9 not to exceed the highest total rate of pay for the Senior 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6399 IH

1 Executive Service under subchapter VIII of chapter 53 of 

2 title 5, United States Code, for the locality involved.’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1203(e) of 

4 the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2003 (2 

5 U.S.C. 1805(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (3). 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply with respect to pay periods begin8 ning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

9 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS TO AC10 QUIRE BUILDING. 

11 (a) AVAILABILITY.—The amounts described in sub12 section (b) shall be available to the Architect of the Capitol 

13 for the acquisition (through purchase, lease, transfer from 

14 another Federal entity, or otherwise) of real property for 

15 the use of the Capitol Police. 

16 (b) AMOUNTS DESCRIBED.—The amounts described 

17 in this subsection are amounts appropriated to, and re18 maining available for obligation by, the Architect of the 

19 Capitol under the heading ‘‘Architect of the Capitol, Cap20 itol Police Buildings and Grounds’’ or under the heading 

21 ‘‘Architect of the Capitol, Capitol Police Buildings, 

22 Grounds and Security’’ in any Act making appropriations 

23 for the legislative branch for fiscal years 2007 through 

24 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Morris Goldsmith, Respondent, v Jean M. Sternberg, et al., Appellants.

— In an action for contribution to recover various expenses incurred in the winding up of a partnership, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.), dated January 9, 1986, which denied their motion, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Morris Goldsmith seeks contribution from the defendants, his former copartners in the now defunct Town-view Nursing Home. He alleges the expenditure of certain amounts on behalf of the partnership incurred during the pendency of the nursing home’s liquidation in bankruptcy in order to satisfy certain recoupment claims made against the nursing home by State Medicaid authorities.

The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), arguing that plaintiffs complaint failed to state a cause of action in contribution. Specifically, the defendants argued that the complaint failed to allege the completion of a formal partnership accounting, which the defendants claim is a prerequisite to the maintenance of an action at law. Special Term denied the motion, concluding that although ordinarily, a formal accounting would be required, the plaintiffs action fell within an exception to the general rule in that the plaintiffs complaint involved a single transaction which was fully closed, but merely unadjusted *(see, e.g., St. James Plaza v Notey,*95 AD2d 804; *Schuler v Birnbaum,*62 AD2d 461). We affirm.

It is settled that "[mjodern pleading rules are 'designed to focus attention on whether the pleader has a cause of action rather than on whether he has properly stated one’ ” *(Rovello v Orofino Realty Co.,*40 NY2d 633, 636, quoting from 6 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 38:19). Moreover, upon a motion to dismiss a pleading for legal insufficiency, "the court must assume that its allegations are true * * * and must deem the complaint to allege whatever can be imputed from its statements by fair and reasonable intendment, however imperfectly, informally or illogically facts may be stated therein” *(Pace v Perk,*81 AD2d 444, 449). Further, in determining whether the plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded a cause of action, defects in the complaint may be remedied by affidavits and other documentary evidence submitted by him *(see, Paynter v Vishnia,*114 AD2d 404, 405; *Datlof v Turetsky,*111 AD2d 364, 365; *see also, Credit Alliance Corp. v Andersen & Co.,*65 NY2d *366536, 541). Our examination of both the complaint and the affidavits submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion reveal allegations which, when assumed to be true, would establish that the partnership’s affairs have long been closed with the sole exception being plaintiff’s claim for contribution. In light of the foregoing, we conclude that Special Term properly declined to dismiss the complaint *(see, Paynter v Vishnia,*114 AD2d 404, 405, *supra).*Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### *In re*GREEN, Spurgeon III

(MR 21108)

Warner Robins, GA

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Spurgeon Green III, who has been disciplined in the State of Georgia, is disbarred in the State of Illinois.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 21110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10546]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-106702-00]
RIN 1545-AX94


Determination of Basis of Partner's Interest; Special Rules; 
Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of a public 
hearing on proposed regulations relating to special rules on 
determination of basis of partner's interest under section 705 of the 
Internal Revenue Code.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for Thursday, May 3, 
2001 at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sonya M. Cruse of the Regulations 
Unit, (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and/or 
notice or public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on 
January 3, 2001, 66 FR 315, announced that a public hearing was 
scheduled for May 3, 2001 at 10:00 a.m., in Room 6718, 1111 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public 
hearing is proposed regulations under section(s) 705 of the Internal 
Revenue Code. The public comment period of these proposed regulations 
expired on April 12, 2001.
    The notice of proposed rulemaking and/or notice of public hearing, 
instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to 
submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. 
As of April 19, 2001, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the 
public hearing scheduled for May 3, 2001, is cancelled.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Acting Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel 
(Modernization & Strategic Planning).
[FR Doc. 01-10546 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1987

Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure

Edward T. Gignoux, Chairman 

W. Reece Bader 

Walter E. Hoffman 

Analya L. Kearse 

Wayne R. LaFave 

Gael Mahony 

Wade H. McCree 

Charles E. Wiggins 

Daniel R. Coquillette, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules

Pierce Lively, Chairman 

Robert H. Bork 

Charles Fried 

Joseph W. Hatchett 

Rex F. Lee 

Vincent L. McKusick 

Kenneth F. Ripple 

Carol Ann Mooney, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules

Lloyd D. George, Chairman 

Norman W. Black 

Franklin T. Dupree, Jr. 

Joel M. Flaum 

Robert Watson Foster 

Lawrence P. King 

Beryi E. McGuire 

Norman H. Nachman 

Joseph Patchan 

Thomas A. Wiseman 

Walter J. Taggart, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

Joseph F. Weis, Jr., Chairman 

John F. Grady 

Larrine S. Holbrooke 

Arthur L. Liman 

Dennis G. Linder 
Arthur R. Miller 

Mariana R. Pfaelzer 

James Powers 

Maurice Rosenberg 

Walter Jay Skinner 

Michael Zimmerman 

Paul D. Carrington, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules

Leland C. Nielsen, Chairman 

Sherman G. Finesilver 

Richard A. Green 

James F. Hewitt 

William L. Hungate 

Frederick B. Lacey 

Herbert J. Miller 

William C. O'Kelley 

Harvey E. Schlesinger 

Leon Silverman 

William F. Weld 

Stephen A. Saltzburg, Reporter
Exhibit








Exhibit 4.29
DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES 
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
As of September 30, 2019, Starbucks Corporation has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”): our Common Stock.
Description of Common Stock
The following description of our Common Stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) and our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each of which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4.29 is a part. We encourage you to read our Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws and the applicable provisions of Washington Business Corporation Act, Title 23B of the Revised Code of Washington, for additional information. 
Authorized Capital Shares 
Our authorized capital shares consist of 2,400,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), and 7,500,000 shares of series preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Preferred Stock”). The outstanding shares of our Common Stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
Voting Rights
Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by the stockholders, including the election of directors. Our Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights.
Dividend Rights
Subject to the rights of holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends.
Liquidation Rights
Subject to the rights of holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, holders of Common Stock will share ratably in all assets legally available for distribution to our shareholders in the event of dissolution.
Other Rights and Preferences
Our Common Stock has no sinking fund or redemption provisions or preemptive, conversion or exchange rights. 
Listing
The Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the trading symbol “SBUX.”
1961 1966 1968 1978 1984 1990

Total 68 10 6, 4T 9, 4T/P 35 24 11 179

DC(1) 9 - - - 2 1 - 11

First 3 - - - 1 2 - 6

Second 6 3 - - 2 2 - 13

Third 7 1 - 1 1 2 2 14

Fourth 3 2 2 - 3 1 4 15

Fifth(2) 7 2 4T 2, 4T/P 11 2 1 17

Sixth 6 - 2 1 2 4 1 16

Seventh 6 1 1 - 1 2 - 11

Eighth 7 - 1 - 1 1 1 11

Ninth(1) 9 - - 4 10 5 - 29

Tenth 5 1 - 1 1 2 2 12

Eleventh(2) - - - - - - - 12

Federal(3) - - - - - - - 12

Abbreviations: T=Temporary; T/P=Temporary to Permanent

 

(3) Pub. L. No. 97-164, April 2, 1982, created the Federal Circuit with 12 judgeships.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Additional Authorized Judgeships

(2) Pub. L. No. 96-452, October 14, 1980, reorganized the Fifth Circuit into two circuits: the Fifth with 14 

judgeships and the Eleventh with 12 judgeships.

Authorized 

Judgeships 

2023

Authorized 

Judgeships 

1960

Additional Judgeships Authorized

(1) Pub. L. No. 110-177, January 7, 2008, transferred one judgeship from the DC Circuit to the Ninth Circuit. 

The loss of the judgeship in the DC Circuit was effective the date the bill became law, but the effective date of 

the additional judgeship for the Ninth Circuit was January 21, 2009.

Pub. L. No. 87-36, May 19, 1961

Pub. L. No. 89-372, March 18, 1966

Pub. L. No. 90-347, June 18, 1968

Pub. L. No. 95-486, October 20, 1978

Pub. L. No. 98-353, July 10, 1984

Pub. L. No. 101-650, December 1, 1990
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 607 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue guidance on 

the interpretation of fair value accounting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2009 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue 

guidance on the interpretation of fair value accounting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SEC GUIDANCE ON FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING. 

4 (a) GUIDANCE.—Not later than 30 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Securities and Ex6 change Commission shall issue guidance on the interpreta7 tion of the fair value accounting standards set forth by 

8 the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including the 

9 Commission’s interpretation and application of Statement 

10 Number 157 of such Board. Such guidance shall address 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 607 IH

1 the issues and recommendations identified in the Commis2 sion’s report submitted to Congress on December 30, 

3 2008, pursuant to Section 133 of the Emergency Eco4 nomic Stabilization Act of 2008 

5 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS OF FASB ACTION.—Not 

6 later than 30 days after the guidance is issued in accord7 ance with subsection (a), the Securities and Exchange 

8 Commission shall report to the Committee on Financial 

9 Services of the House of Representatives and the Com10 mittee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the 

11 Senate on any actions taken by the Financial Accounting 

12 Standards Board relating to the recommendations of the 

13 Commission submitted to Congress on December 30, 

14 2008. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

Date: November 14, 2007

---
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Storage Properties,
 Ltd. (the "Partnership") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald L.
 Havner,  Jr., as Chief  Executive  Officer of Public  Storage,  Inc.,  and John
 Reyes,  as Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Public  Storage,  Inc.,  each  hereby
 certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.

/s/  Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
------------------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    March 31, 2006

/s/  John Reyes
------------------------------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    March 31, 2006



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.