alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6272 

To amend the Homeowners Assistance Program of the Department of Defense 

to eliminate the discretion of the Secretary of Defense to set an earlier 

termination date for the eligibility of a member of the Armed Forces 

for homeowner assistance when the member is permanently reassigned 

by order of the United States Government to a duty station or home 

port outside a 50-mile radius of the member’s base or installation of 

residence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Ms. GIFFORDS (for herself and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition 

to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeowners Assistance Program of the Department of Defense to eliminate the discretion of the 

Secretary of Defense to set an earlier termination date 

for the eligibility of a member of the Armed Forces 

for homeowner assistance when the member is permanently reassigned by order of the United States Government to a duty station or home port outside a 50- 

mile radius of the member’s base or installation of residence. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6272 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemember Home5 owner Assistance Program Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITE TERMINATION DATE FOR AVAILABILITY 

7 OF HOMEOWNER ASSISTANCE FOR MEMBERS 

8 OF THE ARMED FORCES PERMANENTLY RE9 ASSIGNED DURING MORTGAGE CRISIS. 

10 Section 1013(a)(3)(C) of the Demonstration Cities 

11 and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 

12 3374(a)(3)(C)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

13 2012, or an earlier end date designated by the Secretary’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
(9 Misc. Rep. 407.)

#### BARRETT v. JOSYLNN.

(Superior Court of Buffalo, General Term.

July 5, 1894.)

Pleading—Subscribing Complaint.

. Signing the verification of a complaint in the municipal court of Buffalo is equivalent to subscribing the complaint as required by the revised charter of Buffalo, § 459.

Appeal from special term.

*1071Action by George W. Barrett against Henry B. Josylnn. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before TITUS, C. J., and HATCH and WHITE, JJ.

Charles T. Gardner, for appellant.

William C. Kilhoffer, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The only question raised on this appeal is that the complaint is not subscribed by the “plaintiff or his attorney,’’ as required by section 459 of the revised charter, regulating the practice in the municipal court. The complaint was verified by the plaintiff, as required by the Code, and he signed his name to the verification, but did not subscribe the complaint itself. In Harrison v. Wright, 1 N. Y. St. Rep. 730, where the precise question was up, it was held, by the unanimous opinion of the general term of this court, that the signature of the plaintiff to the affidavit was a sufficient subscription of the complaint to meet the requirements of the statute. As no authority is shown us, holding differently, and on facts exactly parallel, we must follow the law as laid down in that case. The judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs.
Notice on Motion to Dismiss Data Provided by the Administrative Office

The Administrative Office has previously posted statistical information collected

by its Statistics Division on the number of motions to dismiss filed, granted, and denied

before and after Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v.

Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009). The purpose was to give the Rules Committees and others

information on the effect of these decisions while more complete and precise information

could be gathered and studied. The Federal Judicial Center has now released its study of

motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), available at

http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/motioniqbal.pdf/$file/motioniqbal.pdf. That

study involved review of underlying motions to dismiss and orders in a large number of

cases, providing more precise information than the AO statistics. The Center is

continuing its work, with a focus on cases in which motions were granted with leave to

amend. Because the FJC data and analysis are now available, there is no present need for

the AO to collect and post statistics on motions to dismiss. The Rules Committees will

continue studying the Center’s recent and forthcoming work and the case-law

developments.
----

----

| 1.  | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the LP. |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 30, 2009                                                                                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                          |
| /s/      Anthony Branca                                                                                       |
| Anthony      Branca                                                                                           |
| Chief      Financial OfficerICON      Capital Corp. General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10439]



[[Page 20969]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-427-818, A-428-828, A-421-808, A-412-820]


Low Enriched Uranium From France, Germany, The Netherlands, and 
the United Kingdom: Notice of Extension of Preliminary Antidumping Duty 
Determinations

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of preliminary antidumping duty 
determinations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 26, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra or Gabriel Adler at 
(202) 482-3965 and (202) 482-3813, respectively; Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department of Commerce (the Department) to issue the 
preliminary determination of an antidumping duty investigation within 
140 days after the date of initiation. However, if the case is 
extraordinarily complicated and additional time is necessary to make 
the preliminary determination, and the parties concerned are 
cooperating in the investigation, section 733(c)(1)(B) of the Act 
allows the Department to extend the time limit for the preliminary 
determination until not later than 190 days after the date of 
initiation.

Background

    On December 27, 2000, the Department initiated the above-referenced 
investigations. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty 
Investigations: Low Enriched Uranium From France, Germany, the 
Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, 66 FR 1080 (January 5, 2001). The 
preliminary determinations are currently due no later than May 16, 
2001.

Extension of Preliminary Determinations

    The Department determines that the parties concerned are 
cooperating, that these investigations are extraordinarily complicated, 
and that additional time is necessary to make the preliminary 
determinations. Therefore, we are postponing the deadline for issuing 
these determinations until July 5, 2001. See Decision Memorandum from 
Melissa Skinner to Holly A. Kuga, dated April 18, 2001, which is on 
file in the Central Records Unit, B-099 of the main Commerce Building. 
We intend to issue the final determinations no later than 75 days after 
the date of these preliminary determinations in accordance with section 
735(a)(1) of the Act.
    This extension is issued and published in accordance with section 
733(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(2). Effective January 20, 2001, 
Bernard T. Carreau is fulfilling the duties of the Assistant Secretary 
for Import Administration.

    Dated: April 19, 2001.
Bernard T. Carreau,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-10439 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Coventure International
  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
  July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
  John Hromyk, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies
  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and result of operations of the Company.

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Coventure International Inc. and will be retained by
  Coventure International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
  or its staff upon request.]

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-3164-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Maine, (FEMA-3164-EM), dated March 20, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

April 16, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Maine is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of March 20, 2001: 
      ( print page 21157)    
Hancock County for emergency protective measures (Category B) under the Public Assistance program for a period of 48 hours.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Robert J. Adamcik, 

Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-10491 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,**

**CHAPTER      63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with                the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act                of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the                Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| /s/                      Patrick J. Byrne |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick J.                Byrne      |   |
| *Chief                Executive Officer*  |   |
| November                5, 2007           |   |
Exhibit 31

Re:  Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2000-1
Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2000-1

I, David Co, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 8-K containing distribution  or servicing
reports filed in respect of periods included in the year
covered by this annual report, of Harborview Mortgage Loan
Trust 2000-1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports,
taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of
the period covered by this annual report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicers under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement is included in these
reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., ABN AMRO Mortgage Group and Cendant
Mortgage Corporation.

Date:  June 9, 2004

By:  /s/:  David Co
           David Co
           Vice President
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

- 0405

_________________ IN RE THE MATTER OF L.R.J., C.M.J., AND C.S.J., BONNIE ANNE JONES and RANDY JOHN JONES, Petitioners and Appellees,

v. LEVI LUKE JONES,

Respondent, MARTHA JOANN JONES,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five

- justice panel of th is Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Jennifer B. Lint , District Judge

. For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 30 2022

11/30/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0405
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wyatt D. Ferry, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, defendant’s motion granted and matter remitted to Chautauqua County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: The court erred in denying defendant’s challenge to the legality of the initial stop and detention of him and his codefendant for questioning. The testimony of the arresting officer established that the suspects’ path was blocked by patrol cars and that the encounter thus was a forcible detention from the outset *(People v Jennings,*45 NY2d 998, 999; *People v Cantor,*36 NY2d 106, 111). " 'Whenever an individual is physically or constructively detained by virtue of a significant interruption of his liberty of movement as a result of police action, that individual has been seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment’ ” *(People v Boodle,*47 NY2d 398, 401, *cert denied*444 US 969, quoting *People v Cantor, supra,*at 111). In order to be justified in its inception and scope, a forcible stop and detention must be founded upon reasonable suspicion that the particular person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime *(People v Cantor, supra,*at 112-113).

We conclude that police did not have reasonable suspicion justifying the stop and detention. At the time the suspects were detained, the arresting officer had heard a radio report of unknown reliability that two burglaries had occurred at about 4:30 a.m. and that an attempted car theft had occurred at 5:50 a.m., about an hour earlier and approximately one mile away. Thereafter, the officer merely observed the two *953men walking on a deserted stretch of road and noted that their pants were wet from the knees down. Given the time, 6:45 a.m. on a summer morning, we do not conclude that the men’s presence on the road, pants wet or not, was indicative of criminal activity *(People v Cantor, supra,*at 113). "[Ijnnocuous behavior alone will not generate a founded or reasonable suspicion that a crime is at hand” *(People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210, 216). The officer had no information tending to connect the men with the reported crimes *(cf., People v Cantor, supra).*Since the stop and detention was unlawful at its inception, the fruits of such detention, including the suspects’ responses to questioning at the scene and tangible evidence seized from them following their arrest, must be suppressed. (Appeal from judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
May 9, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID EARL STANLEY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00909

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified
below for observance.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6269 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for burial in 

national cemeteries for certain members of the reserve components of 

the Armed Forces and National Guard, and to increase the amount 

payable by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the burial and funeral 

expenses of certain veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility 

for burial in national cemeteries for certain members 

of the reserve components of the Armed Forces and 

National Guard, and to increase the amount payable 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the burial and 

funeral expenses of certain veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6269 IH

1 SECTION 1. PERSONS ELIGIBLE FOR INTERMENT IN NA2 TIONAL CEMETERIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2402 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(9) Subject to section 5303A(b)(4) of this title, any 

7 member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces, and 

8 any member of the Army National Guard or the Air Na9 tional Guard, who performed a period of active duty for 

10 training and was discharged or released from such period 

11 of active duty for training under conditions that were 

12 other than dishonorable.’’. 

13 (b) MINIMUM SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR CER14 TAIN INDIVIDUALS.—Section 5303A(b) of title 38, United 

15 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol16 lowing new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(4) For purposes of section 2402(9) of this title, the 

18 minimum active duty service requirements under this sub19 section shall apply to a period of active duty for training 

20 in the same manner that such requirements apply to a 

21 period of active duty.’’. 

22 SEC. 2. BURIAL AND FUNERAL EXPENSES OF CERTAIN VET23 ERANS. 

24 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2302(a) of title 38, 

25 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$300’’ and 

26 inserting ‘‘$500’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6269 IH

1 (b) DEATH IN DEPARTMENT FACILITY; PLOT AL2 LOWANCE.—Section 2303 of title 38, United States Code, 

3 is amended by striking ‘‘$300’’ each place it appears and 

4 inserting ‘‘$500’’. 

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

7 respect to deaths occurring on or after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 14.2
 METROCORP, INC.
 CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT
(as of February 20, 2006)
    Business Ethics
  Conflicts of Interest
   
    
    No employee, officer or director, should accept a personal fiduciary
appointment as executor, trustee, guardian, or committee which develops primarily in
the course of Company business unless prior approval of the Human Resources Department
has been obtained.




---



##### 




    
    If an employee, officer or director or a member of their family has a
direct or indirect interest in a firm which is dealing with the Company and the
interest is sufficient to affect the employees decisions or actions, the employee,
officer or director must not act for the Company in such transactions.
    
    The assets of the Company must not be used to maintain a correspondent
account with another bank in return for a personal loan or preferential terms from such
other banks to an officer of our Company.
    
    Employees, officers and directors must not use inside information
concerning the Company or its customers for their own benefit.
    
    Employees, officers and directors should not engage in pricing arrangements
with other financial institutions.
  Accurate Records and Reports
  
    
    No false or misleading entries or omissions shall be permitted for any
reason whatsoever. This critical responsibility applies to employees who review and
approve reports as well as those who initially prepare them.
    
    The documentation evidencing each transaction and each payment on behalf of
the Company shall fairly represent the nature of such transaction or the purpose of
such payment.
    
    Employees must apply accepted accounting rules and practices, as described
in the Companys policies or procedures.
    
    Employees must follow Company procedures for retaining and disposing of
records.
 Compliance with Applicable Laws
  - 2 -




---



##### 



Reporting Misconduct
  Waivers of this Code
  - 3 -