alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, W. Randall Pittman, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emageon Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 30, 2006 /s/ W. Randall PittmanW. Randall PittmanChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
- 440 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports

REVEIZ v . EL-KASABY Cite as 305 Neb. 440

Elena Reveiz, appellant, v. Bassel El-Kasaby, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 3, 2020. No. S-19-278. Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J Russell Derr , Judge. Affirmed. Denise E. Frost, of Johnson & Mock, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, and, on brief, Stacy L. Morris and Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy, Funke , and Freudenberg , JJ. Per Curiam

. The February 19, 2019, order of the Douglas County District Court is affirmed by an equally divided court. Affirmed. Papik , J., not participating. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/05/2020 01:08 AM CDT
H. R. 6237 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1351 2nd 

Street in Napa, California, as the ‘‘Tom Kongsgaard Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TOM KONGSGAARD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1351 2nd Street in Napa, California, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Tom Kongsgaard Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Tom Kongsgaard Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralph Pacheco, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered July 7, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People, we find that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged *(see, People v Lewis,*64 NY2d 1111; *People v Conyers,*130 AD2d 677).

*856There is no basis to disturb the jury’s determination crediting the identification testimony of the victim *(see, People v Gruttola,*43 NY2d 116; *People v Joyiens,*39 NY2d 197). Thus, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]; *see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490). Mollen, P. J., Eiber, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
- Home
- Media Center

# Press Releases

Hart Loading Dock Incident

Press Release

----

Reopening of Tours

Press Release

----

The April 15 Evacuation Drill

Press Release

----

- First page« First
- Previous page‹‹
- …
-               Page            38
-               Page            39
-               Page            40
-               Page            41
-               Current page            42

## Media Center

              - Press Releases
              - USCP Arrests
              - USCP FAST FACTS

## Yearly Archive

                  - 2024               (4)          
                  - 2023               (26)          
                  - 2022               (36)          
                  - 2021               (73)          
                  - 2020               (9)          
                  - 2019               (15)          
                  - 2018               (14)          
                  - 2017               (28)          
                  - 2016               (18)          
                  - 2015               (10)          
                  - 2014               (14)          
                  - 2013               (10)          
                  - 2012               (10)          
                  - 2011               (13)          
                  - 2010               (10)          
                  - 2009               (18)          
                  - 2008               (11)          
                  - 2007               (14)          
                  - 2006               (23)          
                  - 2005               (18)          
                  - 2004               (24)          
                  - 2003               (15)
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-59228) onForm S-3 and the registration statements (Nos. 333-50154, 333-50156, 333-84628, and 333-105181) on Form S-8 of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. of our reports dated November 15, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sybron DentalSpecialties, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedSeptember 30, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the September 30, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. 

 

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph indicating that the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assetsas of October 1, 2002. 

 

 

Costa Mesa, California

December 14, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Apy, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), rendered August 2, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered his guilty plea after being fully advised of his rights, and in the course of his allocution admitted to the acts which constituted the crime to which he pleaded. Thus, the defendant’s subsequent vague claim of innocence constituted an insufficient basis upon which to vacate his plea of guilty (see, *People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520).

The defendant’s argument, raised in his *pro se*brief, that he was improperly sentenced as a second violent felony offender, has not been preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636) and, in any event, is without merit *(see,*Penal Law § 70.04 [1] [b] [i]; *People v Morse,*62 NY2d 205, *appeal dismissed sub nom. Vega v New York,*469 US 1186). We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his *pro se*brief, and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### MORSE et al., Appellants, v. FREOIT, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Tracy H. Morse and others against Charles J. Freoit.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment of the county court reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the justice’s court affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of DCI USA, Inc. (the "Company")
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 26, 2005                    /s/ Michael Gibbs
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Gibbs
                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 4, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40170

Summary Calendar

 

JESSE JESUS SOLIZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NANNETT HASSETT; JERRY BATEK; JOHN GILMORE; LINDA HARRISON; OSCAR

SOLIZ; PATRICK MCGUIRE; LARRY OLIVAREZ; DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; CHAIRMAN TEXAS BOARD

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-02-CV-437

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesse Jesus Soliz, Texas prisoner #496252, appeals from the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous, for failure

to state a claim, and for seeking relief against immune defendants.

Soliz challenges his state habeas corpus proceedings and his

transfer to the state prison system following revocation of his

parole. Soliz moves to supplement the record; his motion is

DENIED.
2

Soliz contends that he was deprived of access to the courts by

the actions of the state trial court during state habeas corpus

proceedings. Defects in state habeas corpus procedures “do not

constitute grounds for relief in federal court.” Trevino v.

Johnson, 168 F.3d 173, 180 (5th Cir. 1999).

Soliz contends that he was deprived of his right of access to

trial counsel and of his right to communicate with the outside

world by being transferred to the custody of the state prison

system. Soliz had no constitutionally protected right to

incarceration in any particular facility. See Olim v. Wakinekona,

461 U.S. 238, 244-45 (1983).

Soliz contends that the district court erred by failing to

make any findings regarding his claim that defense counsel and the

prosecutor conspired to prosecute him maliciously. Soliz states

that his civil rights were violated by the two defendants, but does

not allege facts or argue law to support that proposition. Soliz

has failed to brief the issue for appeal. Brinkmann v. Dallas

County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Soliz’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Soliz is

warned that the dismissal of his complaint counts as a strike for

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that the dismissal of his

appeal counts as a second strike. Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d

383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). When Soliz accumulates three strikes
3

he will not be allowed to bring a civil action or appeal a judgment

in forma pauperis unless he is “under imminent danger of serious

physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10297]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 21, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. First BanCorp, San Juan, Puerto Rico; to acquire 8.7 percent of 
the voting shares of Southern Security Bank Corporation, Hollywood, 
Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Southern 
Security Bank, Hollywood, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Quinlan Bancshares, Inc., Quinlan, Texas; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Lone Oak Financial Corporation, Lone Oak, 
Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire Lone Oak State Bank, Lone Oak, 
Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 20, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-10297 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 5-00

IN RE: RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and , FARLEY, HOLDAWAY,

IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges

O R D E R

It is ORDERED that the composition of the Court's Rules Advisory Committee is changed

as follows:

Ronald L. Smith, Esq., is designated as Chair, vice J. Michael Hannon, Esq., for a term

ending November 6, 2002.

Robert F. Comeau, Esq., is appointed as a member of the Committee vice J. Michael Hannon,

Esq.

DATED: November 16, 2000 BY THE COURT:

KENNETH B. KRAMER

Chief Judge
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5918 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an investment 

tax credit for biomass heating property and repeal the passive activity 

limitation exception for working interests in oil and gas property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Mr. HODES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an investment tax credit for biomass heating property 

and repeal the passive activity limitation exception for 

working interests in oil and gas property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT FOR BIOMASS HEAT4 ING PROPERTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

6 48(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 

7 energy property) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5918 IH

1 of clause (vi), by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (vii), 

2 and by inserting after clause (vii) the following new clause: 

3 ‘‘(viii) biomass heating property, in4 cluding boilers or furnaces which operate 

5 at output efficiencies greater than 75 per6 cent and which provide thermal energy in 

7 the form of heat, hot water, or steam for 

8 space heating, air conditioning, domestic 

9 hot water, or industrial process heat, but 

10 only with respect to periods ending before 

11 January 1, 2014,’’. 

12 (b) 30 PERCENT CREDIT.—Clause (i) of section 

13 48(a)(2)(A) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ 

14 at the end of subclause (III) and by inserting after sub15 clause (IV) the following new subclause: 

16 ‘‘(V) energy property described in 

17 paragraph (3)(A)(viii), and’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to periods after the date of the 

20 enactment of this Act, in taxable years ending after such 

21 date, under rules similar to the rules of section 48(m) of 

22 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as in effect on the 

23 day before the date of the enactment of the Revenue Rec24 onciliation Act of 1990). 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5918 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCEPTION FROM PASSIVE ACTIVITY 

2 RULES FOR WORKING INTERESTS IN OIL OR 

3 GAS PROPERTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 469 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 paragraph (3). 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (4) of 

8 section 469 (c) of such Code is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘Paragraphs (2) and (3)’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘Paragraph (2)’’, and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘PARAGRAPHS (2) AND (3)’’ in 

12 the heading and inserting ‘‘PARAGRAPH (2)’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the New York Metro Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New York. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, June 28, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, June 28, 2001 6:00 p.m. to 9:20 p.m. at the Internal Revenue Service Brooklyn Building located at 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201. For more information or to confirm attendance, notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen Cain. Mrs. Cain can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555. The public is invited to make oral comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9:20 p.m. on Thursday, June 28, 2001. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555, or write Eileen Cain, CAP Office, P.O. Box R, Brooklyn, NY, 11201. The Agenda will include the following: various IRS issues. Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could prevent effective advance notice. 

Dated: April 24, 2001. 

John J. Mannion, 

Director, Program Planning and Quality. 

[FR Doc. 01-10548 Filed 4-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P