alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                             COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

     This Compliance Certificate is furnished pursuant to Section 2.12 of the
2000-A Servicing Supplement to the Basic Servicing Agreement dated as of
November 1, 2000, among Financial Services Vehicle Trust, BMW Manufacturing LP
and BMWFS, as Servicer (the "Servicing Supplement", and together with the Basic
Servicing Agreement, the "Servicing Agreement") (all capitalized terms used
herein without definition have the respective meanings specified in the
Servicing Agreement).

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:

1.   I am a duly authorized officer of the Servicer;

2.   I have reviewed the terms of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and I have
     made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a detailed review of
     the transactions and conditions of the Servicer and the performance of its
     obligations there under during the period from January 1, 2002 to December
     31, 2002;

3.   To my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2, the Servicer
     has fulfilled all its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement,
     during the period from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002, except as set
     forth below.


     Described below are the exceptions, if any, to paragraph 3 by listing, in
detail, the nature of the condition or event, the period during which it has
existed and the action which the Servicer has taken, is taking, or proposes to
take with respect to each such condition or event: NONE


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereunto set my hand this 9th day of
April, 2003.

           By:         BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

           By:         /s/ Gerald Holzmann
                       --------------------------------
                       Gerald Holzmann

           Title:      CFO
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION

        By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Syndicated Food Service International, Inc.

        Signed this 26th day of November, 2003.


<TABLE>
<S>                                                  <C>
By: /s/ Barry L. Nogay                               By: /s/ Thomas P. Tanis, Jr.
--------------------------------------------         --------------------------------------------
Barry L. Nogay                                       Thomas P. Tanis, Jr.
Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer      President and Chief Executive Officer
</TABLE>


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Syndicated Food Service
International, Inc. and will be retained by Syndicated Food Service
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
HYNES & HOWES INSURANCE COUNSELORS, INC.
                          Notes to Financial Statements
                           September 30, 1998 and 1997



Note 9. Management Fees

         The Company entered into a Management Consultant Retainer Agreement
         with John Howes on October 1, 1972.  Since John Howes no longer desires
         to provide the management consultants services required in the
         agreement, the Company has agreed that the Management Consultant
         Retainer Agreement be assigned, transferred and conveyed to Oak Helm
         Partners who assumed all rights and duties of the Agreement as of
         August 1, 1991. Oak Helm Partners received management fees of $35,750
         for the year ended September 30, 1997 and $39,000 for each of the years
         ended September 30, 1998 and 1996.

Note 10. Provision for Income Taxes

         Due to loss carry forwards from previous years,  a provision for income
         taxes has not been made.  There will be no material effect on the
         Company upon its adoption of  SFAS No. 96, Accounting for Income Taxes.
**Exhibit10.48**

 

January 3,2003

 

 

Tier Technologies, Inc.

1350 Treat Boulevard

Suite 250

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

 

Attention: James L. Bildner, Chairman & CEO

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

This letterdocuments our agreement regarding certain revisions to my Employment Agreementwith Official Payments Corporation, dated as of July 18, 2002 (the “OriginalAgreement” and, as amended by this letter, the “Agreement”).  Except as specifically amended herein, allother terms of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

1)                                      Thethird sentence of the preamble shall be amended in its entirety to read asfollows: “The end of the term of this Agreement is for the period from theEffective Date to May 15, 2003, unless sooner terminated.”

 

Section 1.2 of the Agreement shall be amended and supplemented byadding the following text:  “In additionto the one-time bonus payment to be made on January 15, 2003, Employee will beeligible to receive an additional one-time bonus payment in the amount of$250,000, net of applicable withholdings and deductions.  Payment of this additional one-time bonuswill be made on May 15, 2003 and is contingent upon Employee being activelyemployed by the Company as of May 15, 2003 or having been terminated by theCompany for any reason other than “for cause” as defined in Section 2.1(a)(including, without limitation, by reason of Employee’s death or disability),prior to May 15, 2003. Employee will not be eligible for such bonus if heresigns or if the Company terminates his employment for cause prior to May 15,2003.”

 

Pleaseconfirm your agreement with the foregoing terms by signing the acknowledgmentbelow.

 
|   |                     | Very truly yours,     |
|--------|--------------------------|-----------------------|
|   |                     |                  |
|   |                     | /s/ Michael P. Presto |   |
|   |                     |                  |
|   |                     | Michael P. Presto     |
|   |                     |
|   | Acknowledged and Agreed: |
|   |                     |
|   | TIER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.  |
|   |                     |
|   | By:                      | /s/ Laura B. DePole   |   |
|   | Print Name:              | Laura B. DePole       |   |
|   | Title:                   | CFO/Secretary         |   |
|        |                          |                       |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to May 25, 2021)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-20-664 Geren v. Geren

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
#### *In re*FAWELL, Jeffrey Bruce

(MR 21692)

Wheaton, IL

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Jeffrey Bruce Fawell *689is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Suspension effective October 9, 2007. Respondent Jeffrey Bruce Fawell shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6390 

To require the disclosure to consumers of all fees and charges associated 

with the sale of Major League Baseball tickets prior to the completion 

of any Internet sale of such tickets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the disclosure to consumers of all fees and 

charges associated with the sale of Major League Baseball tickets prior to the completion of any Internet sale 

of such tickets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparent Baseball 

5 Ticket Fees Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6390 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF FEES OF INTERNET BASEBALL 

2 TICKET SALES. 

3 (a) DISCLOSURE REQUIRED.—It shall be unlawful 

4 for any person to complete a primary sale of any Major 

5 League Baseball ticket through an Internet website with6 out disclosing to the consumer, clearly and conspicuously 

7 on the Internet website— 

8 (1) the amount and description of any fees, 

9 convenience charges, or other charges associated 

10 with such sale or ticket; and 

11 (2) the total amount of such fees or charges as 

12 a percentage of the total purchase price. 

13 (b) ENFORCEMENT BY THE FEDERAL TRADE COM14 MISSION.—A violation of subsection (a) shall be treated 

15 as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive 

16 act or practice prescribed under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the 

17 Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)). 

18 The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce this Act in 

19 the same manner, by the same means, and with the same 

20 jurisdiction as though all applicable terms and provisions 

21 of the Federal Trade Commission Act were incorporated 

22 into and made a part of this Act. 

23 (c) DEFINITION.—As used in this Act, the term ‘‘pri24 mary sale’’ means, with regards to a ticket, the initial sale 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6390 IH

1 of a ticket that has not been sold previous to such sale, 

2 to the general public. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
## In The **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo** 

________________________ No. 07 - 20 - 00273 - CV

________________________ JEFFNA MCKINNEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF SID TALL E

Y’S ESTATE , APPELLANT V. LEE BIVINS FOUNDATION D/B/A BIVINS POINTE AND BETTY BIVINS CHILDERS FOUNDATION D/B/A BIVINS POINT E , APPELLEE S On Appeal from the 251st District Court Potter C ounty, Texas Trial Court No. 109 , 178 - C - CV ; Honorable Ana Estevez , Presiding July 27 , 2021 

### ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING Before QUINN , C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER , JJ. By her Motion for Rehearing, Appellant, Jeffna McKinney, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Sid Talley, simply reiterates the same argument she made on appeal — that s ection 74.351(l) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code requires a hearing and that “ there was no hea ring on Appellees ’ motion to dismiss – whether in -2 person , on the relevant pleadings , or otherwise. ” Remaining convinced that our prior disposition was correct, we issue this supplemental opinion to clarify a misconception held by McKinney . She contend s a s follows: [a]t the risk of irritating this Court, Appellant repeats there was no hearing on the pleadings. There could not have been a hearing on the pleadings because the trial court only had one set of pleadings on the dismissal issue — the pleadings of Appellees. The simple fact is that Appellant was no[t] “ heard ” on the motion to dismiss. McKinney should be assured that this c ourt is not “irritated” by the advancement of serious issues and concerns — whether they are ultimately meritorious or not. We are concerned, however, whenever a litigant feels as if her procedural rights have been violated, and we wish to clarify the perceived misconception that a hearing was held by the trial court after hearing only one side of the issue . Based on our review of the record, we found a “hearing on the pleadings,” in the traditional sense of the word, occurred whenever the trial court consider ed the contents of the expert report filed , on the one hand , against the merits of the s ection 74.3 51(l) motion to dismiss , on the other. A s ection 74.351(l) motion to dismiss should be considered “at issue” any time after the deadline for filing has passed . Because the trial court here did not consider the motion to dismiss until after the deadline f or the filing of an expert report, a “hearing” was had, and the motion to dismiss was properly considered. Accordingly, McKinney’s Motion for Rehearing is denied. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 685 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 685

To require a study of the feasibility of establishing the United States 
           Civil Rights Trail System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2009

  Mr. Clay (for himself and Mr. Wamp) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a study of the feasibility of establishing the United States 
           Civil Rights Trail System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Civil Rights Trail 
System Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. FEASIBILITY STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Archivist of the United States, in consultation 
with the Secretary of the Interior, and with the Secretary of 
Agriculture with respect to lands administered by such Secretary, shall 
conduct a study of the feasibility of establishing the United States 
Civil Rights Trail System, as described in subsection (b), in 
substantially the same manner as studies performed by the Secretary of 
the Interior under section 5(b) of the National Trails System Act 
(Public Law 109-418).
    (b) Description of United States Civil Rights Trail System.--For 
purposes of this section, the United States Civil Rights Trail System 
is a system of trails marking the geographic locations in the United 
States (including its territories) of historically significant events 
related to struggles for civil rights based on racial equality, 
including signage or printed materials (or both) that provide 
information about the people and events involved in such struggles and 
associated with such location.

SEC. 3. PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall establish and 
maintain individual trails marking the geographic locations of 
historically significant events related to struggles for civil rights 
based on racial equality. The Secretary shall provide for each trail 
signage or printed materials (or both) that provide information about 
the people and events involved in such struggles and associated with 
such locations.
    (b) Location and Timing.--The Secretary may establish such a trail 
in each State where a significant civil rights event occurred. The 
Secretary shall establish at least 6 such trails as soon as practicable 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section 
there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the 
Interior such sums as are necessary for fiscal years 2010 through 2016.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.2


                          PROVINCE HEALTHCARE COMPANY


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Report of Province Healthcare Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Christopher T. Hannon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

         (2)      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 9, 2003                               /s/ Christopher T. Hannon
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Christopher T. Hannon
                                                Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished to the SEC pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" as part of the
Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to
liability under that section. Such certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Province Healthcare Company and will be
retained by Province Healthcare Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.
Prevent home fires.

Protect what matters.

Always smoke outside, and 

never smoke in bed. Many 

things in your home can catch 

on fire if they touch something 

hot like a cigarette or ashes. 

Protect

Prepare

Have working smoke alarms 

on every level of your home. 

You should have a smoke alarm 

inside bedrooms and outside 

sleeping areas. Test your smoke 

alarms every month to make 

sure they are working. 

Plan

Make a fire escape plan. 

If there is a fire, you may have 

less than 3 minutes to get out of 

your home. Talk about what you 

should do if there is a fire. 

Learn more about fire prevention: www.usfa.fema.gov

Prevent home fires.

Protect what matters.

Protect

Always smoke outside, and 

never smoke in bed. Many 

things in your home can catch 

on fire if they touch something 

hot like a cigarette or ashes. 

Prepare

Have working smoke alarms 

on every level of your home. 

You should have a smoke alarm 

inside bedrooms and outside 

sleeping areas. Test your smoke 

alarms every month to make 

sure they are working. 

Plan

Make a fire escape plan. 

If there is a fire, you may have 

less than 3 minutes to get out of 

your home. Talk about what you 

should do if there is a fire. 

Learn more about fire prevention: www.usfa.fema.gov
Prevenga incendios.

Proteja lo importante.

Siempre fume afuera y nunca 

en la cama. Existen muchos 

elementos en su hogar que 

podrían incendiarse si entran 

en contacto con algo caliente, 

como cigarrillos o cenizas.

Protéjase

Prepárese

Mantenga los detectores de 

humo funcionando en cada 

nivel de su hogar. Debe tener un 

detector de humo dentro y fuera 

de cada dormitorio. Compruebe 

sus detectores de humo todos 

los meses para asegurarse 

que funcionen.

Planifíquese

Cree un plan de escape. Si 

ocurriese un fuego, puede que 

tenga menos de 3 minutos para 

salir de la casa. Converse sobre 

lo que deberían hacer en caso 

de un fuego. 

Aprenda más sobre la prevención 

de incendios en: www.usfa.fema.gov

Prevenga incendios.

Proteja lo importante.

Protéjase

Siempre fume afuera y nunca 

en la cama. Existen muchos 

elementos en su hogar que 

podrían incendiarse si entran 

en contacto con algo caliente, 

como cigarrillos o cenizas.

Prepárese

Mantenga los detectores de 

humo funcionando en cada 

nivel de su hogar. Debe tener un 

detector de humo dentro y fuera 

de cada dormitorio. Compruebe 

sus detectores de humo todos 

los meses para asegurarse 

que funcionen.

Planifíquese

Cree un plan de escape. Si 

ocurriese un fuego, puede que 

tenga menos de 3 minutos para 

salir de la casa. Converse sobre 

lo que deberían hacer en caso 

de un fuego. 

Aprenda más sobre la prevención 

de incendios en: www.usfa.fema.gov
Order entered September 18, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01568-CR

ROBERT ALAN NOURSE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-84640-2013

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s September 10, 2015 motion to supplement the record 

with Defendant’s Exhibit no. 2, the affidavit of non-prosecution, and Defendant’s Exhibit no. 3, 

a photograph of the complaining witness. Appellant states that although the exhibits are 

identified in the index of exhibits, they are not included in the reporter’s record.

The Court has reviewed the reporter’s record filed in this Court and finds that 

Defendant’s Exhibit nos. 2 and 3 are included in the record. Accordingly, to the extent appellant 

seeks to have the record before this Court supplemented, we DENY the motion as moot.

We GRANT the motion to the extent that we ORDER Antoinette Varela, official court 

reporter of the County Court at Law No. 5, to file, within FIVE DAYS of the date of this order, a 
supplemental reporter’s record containing Defendant’s Exhibit nos. 2 and 3 with the Collin 

County District Clerk’s Office. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(h).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Antoinette Varela, official court 

reporter, County Court at Law No. 5, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE