alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.13





 Exhibit 10.13 

 
 



 
 July 8, 2019 
 Stephan
Pace 
 President, Walmart Global 
 Dear Steve: 

As we have discussed, a critical component of our ongoing business strategy for Reynolds Consumer Products will be to explore opportunities for the business
that could lead to an Initial Public Offering (IPO) of the business or potentially a divestiture of the associated business entities. Your assistance is needed by Reynolds as we work through this process to help prepare the business for a successful
transaction. In light of this, we are offering you a special Transaction Success bonus (“Bonus”) that will become payable if a successful IPO is concluded or if there is a sale of the business by June 30, 2020. 

If the transaction is completed, your potential bonus will be $450,204. Fifty percent (50%) of this bonus ($225,102) will be paid to you 30 days after the
effective date of an IPO or the closing date of a sale, so long as you do not voluntarily leave your employment with the succeeding entity during that time. You will be paid the remaining fifty percent (50%) of this bonus six (6) months after
the effective date of an IPO or the closing date, so long as you do not voluntarily leave your employment with the succeeding entity during that time. This bonus is a gross amount and is subject to all applicable tax withholding requirements. This
bonus will not be treated as compensation for any purpose under any benefit plans or programs, unless statutorily required. 
 Because of the significance
of this strategic effort, and given that you are one of a select group of employees to be offered this opportunity, it is of utmost importance that you keep this offer and all its terms entirely confidential. 

Thank you for your willingness to assist the team during this endeavor and for your help in ensuring the success of this very important process for Reynolds
Consumer Products. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	 //s// Lance Mitchell

	 Lance Mitchell

	 Chief Executive Officer

	 Reynolds Consumer Products
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.b

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Theodore Misiewicz, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2005                 /S/ THEODORE MISIEWICZ
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Theodore Misiewicz,
                                       Chief Financial Officer


                                       73
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of GoldSpring, Inc. (the Company) for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert T. Faber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ robert t. faberRobert T. FaberPresident and Chief Executive Officer June 17, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6198 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     November 19, 2010.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
6198) entitled ``An Act to amend title 11 of the United States Code to 
make technical corrections; and for related purposes.'', do pass with 
the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            On page 3, strike lines 1 through 5 and insert the 
      following: ``and

                    ``(F) in paragraph (51D), by inserting `of the 
                filing' after `date' the 1st place it appears,''

            

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 6198

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 49

MARGOT ELIZABETH ROBERTS

* September Term, 20 2 1

O R D E R

Upon c onsideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of

Maryland and the Respondent, Margot Elizabeth Roberts

, to transfer the Respondent to

disability i nactive s tatus by c onsent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19

- 736(c)

, i t is this 8 th day

of December , 202 1

ORDERED , by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it

is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Margot Elizabeth Roberts

, is hereby transferred

to disability i nactive s tatus by consent, and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Margot Elizabeth

Roberts from the register of attorneys in th is Court and certify that fact to the Client

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all C lerks of all judicial tribunals in this State

in accordance with Maryland Rule 19

- 761

.

/s/ Robert N. McDonald

Senior Judge
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Jay Meilstrup, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GameTech International, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: June 14, 2006     /S/ Jay M. Meilstrup     Jay M. Meilstrup  Chief Executive Officer
Presidential Documents

2193

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 8

Thursday, January 11, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 2001–09 of January 3, 2001

U.S. Contribution to the Korea Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO): Certification and Waiver Under

the Heading ‘‘Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and

Related Programs’’ in Title II of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act,

2001, as Enacted in Public Law 106–429

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to section 572(b) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing,

and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2001, (the ‘‘Act’’) (Public Law

106–429), I hereby certify that:

(1) the parties to the Agreed Framework have taken and continue to

take demonstrable steps to implement the Joint Declaration on

Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in which the Government of North

Korea has committed not to test, manufacture, produce, receive, possess,

store, deploy, or use nuclear weapons, and not to possess nuclear reprocessing or uranium enrichment facilities;

(2) the parties to the Agreed Framework have taken and continue to

take demonstrable steps to pursue the North-South dialogue;

(3) North Korea is complying with all provisions of the Agreed Framework;

(6) North Korea is complying with its commitments regarding access to

suspect underground construction at Kumchang-ni; and

(8) the United States is continuing to make significant progress on eliminating the North Korean ballistic missle threat, including further missle

tests and its ballistic missle exports.

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 572(c) of the Act, I

hereby determine that it is vital to the national security interests of the

United States to waive the certification requirements of section 572(b) of

the Act with respect to paragraphs (4), (5), and (7) of section 572(b) and

therefore hereby waive those three certification requirements in order to

furnish up to $55 million in funds made available under the heading ‘‘Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining and Related Programs’’ of the Act,

for assistance for KEDO.

2194 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 8 / Thursday, January 11, 2001 / Presidential Documents

You are hereby authorized and directed to report this certification and

waiver and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification to the Congress

and to arrange for publication of the certification and waiver in the Federal

Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, January 3, 2001

œ–

[FR Doc. 01–1061

Filed 01–10–01; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
#### In the Matter of Eugene J. Lauritano, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Kane, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 23, 1987, which assessed the employer for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

The employer herein, a real estate appraiser, has been assessed additional unemployment contributions for other real estate appraisers who performed work assigned to them by the employer on the ground that they were his employees rather than independent contractors. In our view, that decision must be reversed for lack of substantial evidence that an employment relationship exists between the employer and the various other independent appraisers who performed services on his behalf *(see, Matter of Ted Is Back Corp. [Roberts],*64 NY2d 725).

Here, the employer maintained a pool of six individuals who were available to assist him in the appraisal of residential and commercial real properties for various lenders, primarily banks, who retained the services of the employer. These individuals, qualified appraisers, called in to request assignments from the employer as they saw fit. They worked their own hours, were not subject to any schedule imposed by the employer and were not required to report to him on a regular basis. There was no schedule of hours of work and they would come to his office or call in whenever they desired an assignment. There were no restrictions on working for other people, on their own or in any other type of employment. There were no business cards or other materials furnished by the employer, nor was any office space available for them, although they could use the telephone in the office for personal matters. They provided their own cameras for photographing appraisal sites and were required to pay the costs of film and developing. The only forms they were provided with were standard Federal National Mortgage Association forms which the employer obtained from various lending institutions for the purpose of the appraisals. These appraisers paid all of their own expenses, none- of which were reimbursed. The employer forwarded their appraisals to the lending institutions along with his bill for services and then paid the particular appraiser a percentage of that fee upon receipt of payment by the employer. The percentage ranged from 35% to 50% in accordance with industry practice and the experience of the particular appraiser.

*998It is our view that there is no evidence in this record to support the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that there existed an employer/employee relationship between this employer and the independent appraisers who assisted him *(see, Matter of Ted Is Back Corp. [Roberts], supra).*

Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
(85 South. 704)

#### BOWERS v. YANCEY.

(7 Div. 85.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 30, 1920.)

Champerty and maintenance <&wkey;7(5) — Defendant’s possession held not to affect force of deeds under which plaintiff in ejectment claimed.

In an action in statutory ejectment under Code 1907, § 3839, giving plaintiff an election to proceed by action of ejectment or by the statutory action, the fact that defendant was in possession, holding the lands adversely, did not affect the admissibility or probative value of such deeds.

Appeal from Circuit Court,- De Kalb County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

Ejectment by W. J. Yancey against B. Bowers, alias, etc. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

It was agreed that T. J. Duffey owned the land in question, and each party traced to him as the common source of title. Plaintiff claimed by deed from Duffey to H. Bowers, and from H. Bowers to himself. Defendant claimed that before Duffey executed the deed to H. Bowers he contracted .with defendant to give him the land in consideration that defendant would look after him and care for him; that he put defendant in possession, agreeing to execute a deed later, and that the defendant was in possession, exercising acts *424oí ownership, when Duffey made his deed to Hersehel Bowers.

Isbell, Scott & Downer, of Ft. Payne, for appellant.

The plaintiff’s deed was void as to Bowers. 149 Ala. 164, 43 South. 13; 76 Ala. 600; 73 Ala. 537; 72 Ala. 546; 86 Ala. 320, 5 South. 495; 107 Ala. 530, 18 South. 103; 116 Ala. 826, 22 South. 910, 67 Am. St. Rep. 149.

E. P. Reed, of Collinsville, for appellee.

The court properly directed a verdict for the -plaintiff. Section 3839, Code 1907; 197 Ala. 611, 73 South. 114.

SAYRE, J.

Statutory action of ejectment by appellee against appellant. The fact that appellant was in possession holding adversely did not affect the admissibility or probative force of the deeds under which appellee showed^ title. Code, § 3839; Nichols v. Nichols, 179 Ala. 611, 60 South. 855; (Reichert v. Sheip, 85 South. 267,1 The cases cited by appellant arose prior to the change in the statute law now appearing in the section of the Code supra.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BROWN, JJ., concur.

1

 Ante, p. 86.

<S=>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.5

             SCHEDULE OF WARRANTS ISSUED (SB SERIES)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DATE OF          NAME OF WARRANT RECIPIENT          WARRANT         NUMBER OF           EXERCISE PRICE
ISSUANCE                                            NO.             SHARES OF           EXPIRES
                                                                    COMMON STOCK
----------------- -------------------------------- --------------- ----------------- ------------------------
<S>               <C>                              <C>             <C>               <C>
4/17/2000         Sand Brothers & Co., Ltd.        SB-1            125,000           Exercise Price:  $1.625
                                                                                     Expires 4/17/2005
4/17/2000         Lloyd H. Saunders                SB-2            75,000            Exercise Price:  $1.625
                                                                                     Expires 4/17/2005
4/17/2000         James Kellog                     SB-3            50,000            Exercise Price:  $1.625
                                                                                     Expires 4/17/2005
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky Owens, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court properly found that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant. The police knew a burglary had been committed minutes earlier and followed an unbroken trail of fresh footprints in the snow leading to defendant. Defendant slowed from a run to a walk and was out of breath when first observed by the police, he was wearing large sneakers which fit the footprints, he gave a false identification and he was recognized by the police officer *960from his prior involvement in burglary related incidents. Under these circumstances a reasonable person would conclude that defendant was the perpetrator of the attempted burglary *(see, People v McRay,*51 NY2d 594, 602; *People v Cantor,*36 NY2d 106, 111; *People v Johnson,*102 AD2d 616, 623; *People v Grant,*83 AD2d 277, 280; *People v Karpel,*66 AD2d 960, 961). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — attempted burglary, second degree; criminal mischief, fourth degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
USFA staff will share information on the education and training needs of chief officers and other fire service managers seeking to create, execute and evaluate measurably successful community risk reduction (CRR) platforms and programs.

## National Fire Academy community risk reduction: Institutional learning or strategic partnership?

## Mike Weller

NFA Training Specialist

National Fire Academy (NFA) training specialist Mike Weller will co-present with Richland (Washington) Fire Department Chief Tom Huntington on May 11 from 10:45 a.m. to Noon. Their presentation will explore the effectiveness of placing multiple students from the same fire department into CRR courses and how learning together helps department colleagues to work collaboratively to build an organizational culture that institutionalizes risk reduction as a core value.

## NFA training

CRR courses at the NFA empower students with skills to help foster safe, healthy, prepared and resilient communities. Courses align with national professional qualification standards and support a strategic all-hazards approach to the prevention and mitigation of community risks. Our curriculum serves all levels of the emergency services from practitioners to executive-level officers, and features a broad composition of online-mediated and self-study courses, as well as field and on-campus courses.

Explore CRR courses
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

s0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140689 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140689 

 COA: 295345 

Washtenaw CC: 08-002191-FC 

DEWUAN ISAAC SIMMONS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF
2002


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer of Equity Office Properties Trust,
the general partner of EOP Operating Limited Partnership (the
Company), each hereby certifies that to his/ her
knowledge, on the date hereof:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (a) the Form 10-Q of the Company for
    the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, filed on the
    date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (b) information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                          

Date: November 9, 2004

| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ RICHARD D. KINCAID                   
| |                                          
| | Richard D. Kincaid                       
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer
| | of Equity Office Properties Trust,       
| | the general partner of                   
| | EOP Operating Limited Partnership        

Date: November 9, 2004

| |                                   
| | ----------------------------------
| | /s/ MARSHA C. WILLIAMS            
| |                                   
| | Marsha C. Williams                
| | Executive Vice President          
| | and Chief Financial Officer       
| | of Equity Office Properties Trust,
| | the general partner of EOP        
| | Operating Limited Partnership