alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 


[PricewaterhouseCoopers
Letterhead]


 


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


1250 René-Lévesque Boulevard
West


Suite 2800


Montréal, Quebec


Canada H3b 2G4


Telephone +1 514 205 5000


Facsimile +1 514 876 1502


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


 


We
hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form F-8 of
our report dated Febraury 16, 2010 relating to the financial statements of
Osisko Mining Corporation, which appears in such Registration Statement.


 


 


	
  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

  	
   

  
	
  PricewaterhouseCoopers
  LLP

  	
   

  



 


 


Montréal,
Quebec, Canada


 


April 13,
2010
# No Hay Traducción Disponible

Lo sentimos, en este momento aún no tenemos la página que busca en español.  Puede buscar otra información sobre el tema en nuestro sitio web. 

Para volver al contenido original en inglés  haga clic aquí.

Si usted cree que recibió este mensaje por error, le sugerimos lo siguiente:
                      - Verifique que la dirección web (URL) esté escrita correctamente y esté completa.
                      - Utilice el mapa de sitio web (site map).
                      - Escriba lo que busca en el encasillado de búsqueda localizado en la esquina superior derecha de esta página.

Para reportar un enlace que no funciona, por favor envíe un mensaje al administrador del sitio web en uscis.webmaster@uscis.dhs.gov.

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

 

I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer ofIWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Registrant”), does hereby certify in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Annual report on Form 10-KSB of theRegistrant, to which this certificate is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m), as amended; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| March 30,  2004 | /s/ Henry J.  Boucher, Jr. |   |
|-----------------|----------------------------|--------|
|            | Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

----
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO

260 Madison Ave., Suite 204

New York, NY 10016

P: (212) 302-7900

F: (212) 202-6203

www.aecpa.com

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-146265) and Forms
F-3 (File Nos. 333-114504 and 333-130632) of ViryaNet Ltd. of our report dated May 14th, 2012, relating to the financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|                                
|/s/ Arik Eshel, CPA & Assoc., PC
|New York, NY, USA               
|May 14th, 2012
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 13-07

IN RE: RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

 

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, pursuant to the authority of 38 U.S.C. §§ 7263(b) and 7264(a),

the Court has adopted a clerical revision to Rule 33(a) of the Court's Rules of Practice and

Procedure (Rules). It is 

ORDERED that the phrase "See also Rule 34(f)" shall be stricken from Rule 33(a) and that,

accordingly, the attached change to Rule 33(a) is hereby published and will be effective as of this

date.

 

DATED: June 14, 2007 FOR THE COURT:

NORMAN Y. HERRING

Clerk of the Court
RULE 33. STAFF CONFERENCE

(a) Participation. The Court may direct the representatives and selfrepresented parties to participate in a staff conference, in person or by

telephone, to consider refinement of the issues and such other matters as may

help the Court resolve the case. When necessary following such a conference,

the Court will enter an appropriate order to control future proceedings. This rule

does not prevent the parties from discussing settlement or agreeing to dismiss

the appeal before argument or submission of the case. See also Rule 34(f).
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                        and Principal Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



         In  connection  with this  annual  report  on Form  10-K of   Excalibur
         Industries I, Joseph P. Hubert,  Chief Executive  Officer and Principal
         Financial Officer of Excalibur Industries, certify, pursuant to Section
         906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Excalibur Systems.


Date: August 7, 2006               /s/ Joseph P. Hubert
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Joseph P. Hubert
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6111 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6111

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend to the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2010

Mr. Van Hollen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend to the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK 
              COMMISSION.

    Section 6(g) of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act (16 
U.S.C. 410y-4(g)) is amended by striking ``40'' and inserting ``50''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6284 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6284

 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
  from regulating, based on material composition, any type of firearm 
                     ammunition or fishing tackle.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

 Mr. Broun of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. King 
 of Iowa, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mr. Bishop 
  of Utah, Mr. Posey, Mr. Neugebauer, Ms. Granger, Mr. Marchant, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Latta, Mr. Lamborn, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Pitts, 
  Mr. McClintock, Mr. Jordan of Ohio, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
Hoekstra, Mr. Coffman of Colorado, Mr. Olson, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Graves 
  of Georgia, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Carter, Mr. 
Akin, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Boozman, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. 
Moran of Kansas, and Mr. Scalise) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
  from regulating, based on material composition, any type of firearm 
                     ammunition or fishing tackle.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIREARM AMMUNITION AND FISHING TACKLE.

    The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may not 
prohibit, limit, or control, based on material composition, any type of 
firearm ammunition or fishing tackle.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francisco La Boy, Jr., Appellant.

Weiss, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chenango County (Dowd, J.), rendered February 9, 1987, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Defendant was charged in a three-count indictment with the fatal stabbing of a fellow inmate on July 10, 1986 at Camp Pharsalia Correctional Facility in Chenango County. Pursuant to a negotiated bargain, he entered a plea of guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. The original sentencing date was postponed at defendant’s request for the appointment of new counsel and in view of his motion to vacate the plea. Upon the return date, defendant withdrew his vacatur motion and was sentenced, as a predicate felon, to a term of 12 Vi to 25 years’ imprisonment. This appeal ensued.

Essentially, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the plea allocution, complaining that County Court’s reading of the indictment failed to substantiate a factual predicate for the plea. Having withdrawn his motion to vacate the plea, defendant has failed to preserve this issue for our review *(see, People v Robideau,*133 AD2d 903, *lv denied*71 NY2d 902; *People v Langhorn,*119 AD2d 844, *Iv denied*68 NY2d 758). In any event, defendant directly admitted the stabbing as charged in the indictment and there is nothing in this record indicating that the plea was improvident or baseless *(see, People v Everett,*146 AD2d 950; *People v Jerome,*142 AD2d 889, *lv denied*72 NY2d 1046). Consequently, we perceive no impropriety in County Court’s acceptance of defendant’s guilty plea.

Judgment affirmed. Weiss, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND RULE 13a  14(b) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Cindy B. TaylorName: Cindy B. Taylor
Date: February 20, 2009
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maple Lee O’Neil, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewed in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Ford,*66 NY2d 428, 437), the evidence amply supports the verdict. Credibility of the witnesses was for the jury to resolve *(see, People v De Tore,*34 NY2d 199, 206-207, *cert denied sub nom. Wedra v New York,*419 US 1025; *People v Christian,*139 AD2d 896, *Iv denied*71 NY2d 1024), and based upon our independent review of the record the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant waived his right to challenge the evidence seized from his apartment by failing to make a suppression motion *(see,*CPL 710.70 [3]; *967
      *People v Bertolo,*65 NY2d 111, 121; *People v Martinez,*105 AD2d 873, 874). In view of the court’s curative instructions, the prosecutor’s improper comments on summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. On this record defendant’s sentence is not excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — robbery, first degree; grand larceny, fourth degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### LANSBURGH, Respondent, v. WALSH et al., Appellants.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Max Lansburgh against Thomas Walsh and another.

Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and VAN WYCK, J.

M. J. Scanlon, for appellants.

L. G. Rosenblatt, for respondent.

EHRLICH, G. J.

The facts as they appear in the appeal book are substantially the same as on the former appeal (20 N. Y. Supp. 401), and for the reasons stated in the opinion of Van Wyck, J., the case was one for determination by a jury; and, for not sending it to the jury, the nonsuit ordered on the first trial was set aside. The second trial (that which we are now reviewing) seems to have been conducted on the lines laid down in the ■opinion filed on the former appeal (20 N. Y. Supp. 401); and the finding of the jury in favor of the plaintiff being satisfactorily sustained by the evidence, and no error appearing in the rulings which require correction by a new trial, it follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with •costs.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Mark A. Payne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Redline Performance
   Products, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
      report is being prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the
      "Evaluation Date"); and

   c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
      Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
   of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
   functions):

   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
   annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
   in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
   to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
   with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  June 29, 2004

/s/  Mark A. Payne
------------------------
Mark A. Payne
Chief Executive Officer,
President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ixia Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
    
    March 6, 2009
    
    /s/ Atul Bhatnagar

Atul BhatnagarPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    March 6, 2009
    
    /s/ Thomas B. Miller

Thomas B. MillerChief Financial Officer
 85
EXHIBIT
      32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications




The
      undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shandong Zhouyuan
      Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd., and will be retained by Shandong
      Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.


September
                      8, 2008
                
                
                /s/
                    Wang ZhigangWang
                      Zhigang (Chief Executive
                      Officer)
 September
                    8, 2008
              
              
              /s/
                    Zhang ChunmanZhang
                      Chunman (Chief Financial
                      Officer)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6284 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from 

regulating, based on material composition, any type of firearm ammunition or fishing tackle. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. BROUN of Georgia (for himself, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. KING

of Iowa, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. 

BISHOP of Utah, Mr. POSEY, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. 

MARCHANT, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. WAMP, Mr. LATTA, Mr. LAMBORN, 

Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. PITTS, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. 

SHADEGG, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, 

Mr. OLSON, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. GOHMERT, 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. CARTER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. MILLER of 

Florida, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. MORAN of 

Kansas, and Mr. SCALISE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating, based on material composition, any type of firearm ammunition or fishing tackle. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIREARM AMMUNITION AND FISHING TACKLE. 

4 The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency may not prohibit, limit, or control, based on mateVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:53 Oct 09, 2010 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6284.IH H6284

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6284 IH

1 rial composition, any type of firearm ammunition or fish2 ing tackle. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-142912 and 333-148616) of Intraop
Medical Corporation of our report dated December 19, 2008, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Intraop Medical Corporation as of September 30,
2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit) and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2008 and September
30, 2007, which appear in this annual report filed on Form 10-K.


/s/ PMB Helin Donovan, LLP


PMB Helin Donovan, LLP


San Francisco, California

December 22, 2008
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “First Amendment”), is made and entered into this 31st day of October, 2019
by and between VERB TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC. (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, and RORY J. CUTAIA (the
“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Executive are parties to an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of November 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”),
which provides that the Agreement would terminate on November 1, 2019, unless extended pursuant to its terms;


 


WHEREAS, the Company
desires to continue to employ the Executive as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Executive wishes to accept such
continued employment under the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, as further modified by this First Amendment; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties
desire to extend the term of the Agreement until December 31, 2019, subject to the terms of this First Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
of which is mutually acknowledged, the Company and the Executive (individually a “Party” and together the “Parties”)
agree as follows:


 


1. Amendment.
The term of the Agreement is hereby extended for the period beginning on November 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2019.


 


2. Waiver.
The Parties hereby agree to waive the ninety (90) day advance notice requirement to extend the term of the Agreement asrequired
by Section 4.1 of the Agreement.


 


3. Ratification.
Except as modified and amended by this First Amendment, the parties hereto hereby agree and confirm that the Agreement remains
in full force and effect.


 


4. Counterparts.
This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together,
shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


(Signature Page Follows)


 



    	 



    	 



    

  





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned have executed this First Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	 	VERB TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    James P. Geiskopf
	 	 	James P. Geiskopf
	 	 	Lead Director
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/
    Rory J. Cutaia
	 	 	Rory J. Cutaia
#### PEOPLE ex rel. DEXTER v. PALMER et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

May 8, 1894.)

Proceeding by the people on the relation of Orrando P. Dexter against Elijah A. Palmer and others, as assessors.

Argued before MAYHAM, P. J., and PUTNAM and HERRICK, JJ.

No opinion. Order reversed, case to be returned to special term to be heard upon the merits, upon the appellant’s paying $50, and printing and •other disbursements of this appeal.
#### HOLLY et al., Respondents, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO., Appellant.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

May 7, 1894.)

Appeal from equity term.

Action by Henry R. Holly and others against the Manhattan Railway Company.

Argued before SEDGWICK, C. J„ and FREEDMAN and McADAM, JJ.

Davies, Short & Townsend, for appellant

Cannon & Atwater, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.