alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SAVE Governing Laws

These laws govern SAVE:

## Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA)

The IRCA required the former Immigration and Naturalization Service to create a system for verifying the immigration status of non-citizen applicants for, and recipients of, certain types of federally funded benefits. The IRCA also required that the system be made available to federal, state and local agencies administering these benefits. USCIS now performs this function.

## Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA)

The PRWORA restructured the welfare system in the U.S. and restricted immigrant eligibility for public benefits, expanding the need to verify immigration status through benefit-granting agencies. The PRWORA also defines “federal public benefits” and “state and local public benefits.”

## Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA)

The IIRIRA required that DHS-USCIS, as a successor to the Immigration and Naturalization Service, respond to inquiries from federal, state and local agencies seeking to verify or determine the citizenship or immigration status of any individual within the jurisdiction of the agency for any purposes authorized by law. Under this authority, agencies can use SAVE to determine such an individual’s immigration status or naturalized/derived citizenship.

## REAL ID Act of 2005

The REAL ID Act established certain minimum standards for state-issued driver's licenses and state-issued identification cards in order for those documents to be acceptable for official federal purposes as specified by the statute.

## Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act provided for a variety of healthcare reforms, including health insurance benefits for qualified noncitizen lawfully present in the U.S. As part of this eligibility determination, health and human services agencies use SAVE to verify a benefit applicant’s immigration status or naturalized/derived citizenship.

## Useful Links

                - About SAVE 

11/24/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Catarino MARTINEZ CASTELLON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40731

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Catarino Martinez Castellón, Pecos, TX, pro se.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Catarino Martinez Castellón has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Martinez Castellón has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Martinez Castellon’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Sheppard, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of FIRSTBINGO.COM INC.;

1. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
3. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 7th day of April, 2004.



| | /s/ Thomas Sheppard
Thomas Sheppard
Principal Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------





---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alltee Tolliver, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), both rendered June 7, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts) under indictment No. 112/85 and violation of probation under indictment No. 159/ 84, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1




                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth E. Stinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/Kenneth E. Stinson
------------------------
Kenneth E. Stinson
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
(8 Misc. Rep. 314.)

#### WILLIAMS v. FISHER.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 17, 1894.)

Evidence—Parol to Vary Writing.

The rule that parol evidence is not admissible to vary a writing does not apply to persons not parties to the writing.

Appeal from eleventh district court.

Action by I. Newton Williams against Isabella H. Fisher. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

Frank L. Crawford, for appellant.

I. Newton Williams, in pro. per.

BOOKSTAVER, J.

This action was brought to recover attorney’s fees for services rendered in an action in the supreme court which was settled between the parties without the consent of the plaintiff’s attorney in that action, being the respondent herein. Upon the trial the release so executed between the parties was given in evidence; and, thereafter, respondent introduced oral testimony tending to show what his charges vrere, and that the appellant herein, being defendant in the supreme court action, undertook to pay them. This was objected to by appellant on the ground that no oral testimony could be given to vary, enlarge, or define the written release. This contention is undoubtedly good, as between the parties to the contract itself, but not as to strangers to it, as the respondent in this case was. The rule prohibiting the reception of parol evidence to vary or modify a written agreement does not apply where the original contract was verbal and entire, and a part, only, reduced to writing. Nor does it apply to a collateral undertaking,. or to a stranger to the contract. Besides, where a promise is made by a party as a condition of compromise of a litigation for another’s benefit, that other can maintain an action upon it. See Todd v. Weber, 95 N. Y. 181; Rector v. Teed, 120 N. Y. 583, 24 N. E. 1014; Gifford v. Corrigan, 105 N. Y. 223, 11 N. E. 498; Id.117 N. Y. 257, 22 N. E. 756. The judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10(i)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 5
                                       TO
                               METATEC CORPORATION
                             1990 STOCK OPTION PLAN


         The Metatec Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan, as previously amended
by Amendment No. 1 dated May 1, 1992, Amendment No. 2 dated February 22, 1993,
Amendment No. 3 dated March 21, 1994, and Amendment No. 4 dated October 26, 1995
(collectively, the "Plan"), is hereby amended pursuant to the following
provisions:

Section 1. Definitions.

         All capitalized terms used in this amendment which are not otherwise
defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Plan.

Section 2. Nonqualified Options - Termination of Relationship.

         Section 5(c)(v) of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety
as follows:

                  Except as provided in Section 9, below, if the Grantee ceases
         to be an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiary
         corporations or a director of a subsidiary corporation of the Company
         by reason of his death, disability, retirement, resignation,
         replacement, or any other reason, then the Nonqualified Option or any
         unexercised portion of the Nonqualified Option which otherwise is
         exercisable shall terminate unless it is exercised within three months
         after the date the Grantee ceases to be such an officer, employee or
         director (but in no event after expiration of the original term of the
         Nonqualified Option); provided that: (A) if the Grantee ceases to be
         such an officer, employee or director by reason of the Grantee's death,
         the three-month period shall instead be a one-year period; and (B) the
         Committee may at any time, in its discretion, extend the termination
         date of any Nonqualified Option for any length of time up to one year
         after the date the Grantee ceases to be such an officer, employee or
         director (but in no event after the expiration of the original term of
         the Nonqualified Option).

Section 3. Effective Date; Construction.

         The effective date of this amendment is July 16, 1997, and this
amendment shall be deemed to be a part of the Plan as of such date. In the event
of any inconsistencies between the provisions of the Plan and this amendment,
the provisions of this amendment shall control. Except as modified by this
amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect without change.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Peter B. Day,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Endo Networks, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2003 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents in all material  respects the  financial
condition and results of operations of Capitol First Corporation.


                                  By: /s/ Peter B. Day
                                      -------------------
                                  Name:   Peter B. Day
                                  Title:  Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting


Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Monday, April 30, 2001.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Michelle A. Smith, Assistant to 
the Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-10246 Filed 4-20-01; 12:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# Judiciary News - United States Courts

- Judge Aleta Trauger Opened Doors for Women in Law Aleta A. Trauger earned a reputation as a tough prosecutor after convicting a former Tennessee governor during her stint at the U.S. attorney’s office. The 1981 case, which dealt with selling liquor licenses to political friends, gave her credibility in a male-dominated space.
- Case Closure Rates Get Longer as E-Discovery Increases Across the country, federal defender offices are struggling with increasingly complex litigation marked by escalating electronic discovery demands. Staffing shortages and the lingering effects of the COVID pandemic have added to their challenges.
- Conference Acts to Promote Random Case Assignment The Judicial Conference of the United States has strengthened the policy governing random case assignment, limiting the ability of litigants to effectively choose judges in certain cases by where they file a lawsuit.
- Judiciary Releases Annual Report and Judicial Business Data The Judiciary today released its Annual Report providing detailed information about mission critical initiatives that advanced over the course of 2023, including efforts to enhance the court system’s physical and information technology security and modernize its IT systems.
- New Court Programs Inspire Students to Enter Legal Profession Federal judges across the country are partnering with local bar associations, community groups, and schools to bring programs like these to high school students in the communities they serve.
- Judge Raymond Lohier Shares His Immigration Story and the Diverse Perspective it Brings A new video profile explores Judge Raymond J. Lohier, Jr.'s, Haitian and Caribbean heritage and the story of how his family came to America.
- New Civics Education Program Puts a Local Lens on Landmark Supreme Court Cases Twenty-two high school students in the St. Louis area were the first to participate in a new civics education program teaching them about the federal Judiciary through a landmark Supreme Court case that originated in their hometown and local court.
- Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.8 Percent Total bankruptcy filings rose 16.8 percent, with significant increases in both business and non-business bankruptcies, in the twelve-month period ending Dec. 31, 2023. This accelerates a continuing rebound in filings after more than a decade of sharply dropping totals.
- Chief Justice Roberts Issues 2023 Year-End Report Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has issued his 2023 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary.
- Federal Judges Bring Civil Discourse Program to Law Students Court proceedings put a premium on decorum and civil discourse, but the skills and dispositions that set the stage start long before the attorneys and parties enter the courtroom. That is why federal judges and attorneys collaborated with Duke Law School to bring the Judiciary’s Civil Discourse and Difficult Decisions program to law students for the first time.
EXHIBIT 12.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Bell Canada International Inc. (the "Corporation") is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report").

     I, William D. Anderson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

     (a)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Corporation.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bell Canada International Inc. and will be retained by Bell
Canada International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



Bell Canada International Inc.


By: (s) William D. Anderson
    ---------------------------------------------
     William D. Anderson
     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  April 30, 2003
## Radio

RADIO NEWS

Newsline

Features

Previous Newsline

Previous Features

### Sign Up for Updates

Subscribe

# USDA Trims Price Forecasts for Several Crops

**Date**:  Thu, 04/11/2024    Broadcast: 01

**Remark**:  Price prospects for several major crops are not improving--in fact, just the opposite.  (Gary Crawford)

**Duration**:  00:01:00.024

**Author**:  GCRAWFOR 

**MP3**:           Your browser does not support the audio element.      AOCDCWA25000153_0DEF05F043464B0F81188B5E48F1DF35.mp3
#### *In re*DePEW, James Russell

(MR 20973)

Bloomington, IL

Order of the Court:

The motion by James Russell DePew to strike his name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(a) is allowed, effective immediately.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sanding Tao, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the small business issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (this "report");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

 Date:  July 27, 2005


By:  /s/ Sanding Tao
-----------------------
Sanding Tao
Chief Financial Officer