alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>           
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed  consolidated financial statements included herein and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 8,953,813
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            452,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                            3,183,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      12,623,300
<PP&E>                                                 4,142,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (1,311,513)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        17,080,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  2,665,994
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                              55,851,254
<OTHER-SE>                                           (42,401,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          17,080,233
<SALES>                                                    2,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          16,291
<CGS>                                                      8,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,373,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          (3,858)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (1,226,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (1,226,367)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (1,226,367)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
#### In re ALLEN. GROSS, Appellant, v. TOTMAN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Final accounting of Van Burén Gross, as sole surviving assignee of William H. Allen.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By notice dated August 18, 2000, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 6, 2000, (65 FR 54071) Salsbury Chemicals, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616-3466, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.                

The firm plans to import phenylacetone to manufacture amphetamine for distribution to its customers.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Salsbury Chemicals, Inc. is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Salsbury Chemicals, Inc. to ensure that the company's continued registration is consistent with the public interest. This investigation included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the Company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act and in accordance with title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, section 1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above.

Dated: April 13, 2001.

Laura M. Nagel,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 01-10257  Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
<PAGE>   1
SUMMARY OF 2000 SENIOR EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN                    EXHIBIT 10.32

A targeted bonus equal to 50% of Dennis Ganster's base compensation and 40% of
the base compensation of the other senior executives is payable for the fiscal
year 2000 upon achievement of performance goals. Fifty percent of the bonus is
payable upon achievement of targeted revenue growth and fifty percent is payable
upon achievement or targeted earnings per share levels. Actual bonuses may be
greater or lesser than the targeted bonus levels, dependent upon deviation in
actual performance from performance goals. Participating senior executives must
be employed by the Company at the date of the payment of the bonus.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 08-11

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGE

O R D E R

WHEREAS Senior Judge Frank Q. Nebeker was recalled to perform substantial service to

the Court by reviewing and deciding appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court for the period

from January 3, 2011, to March 31, 2011, and

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled again, Senior Judge

Nebeker would provide additional substantial service to the Court, and

WHEREAS Senior Judge Nebeker has agreed to be available for such recall service,

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that, effective the date of this order, Senior Judge Nebeker is recalled for one day

to perform substantial service to the Court. This service shall be recorded and maintained by the

Clerk of the Court.

DATED: May 5, 2011 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge
1	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	2	 



     


    

 


 






    	 	3	 



     


    

 


 






    	 	4	 



     


    

 


 






    	 	5	 



     


    

 


 






    	 	6
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00408

- CV

___________________________

On App e al from the 43rd District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV21

- 1755

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### K EVIN 

### A LLISON



### , Appellant

V



### .

R

ANDAL 

### P OIRIER



### , INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A DERIVATIVE PLAINTIFF ON

BEHALF O F 

### B AREHIDE 

### R ANCH



### , I NC



### . , Appellee s2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We gran t the

mo t ion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : January 12, 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6163 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6163

   To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve 
   waivers under the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social 
   Security Act that are related to State provider taxes that exempt 
                    certain retirement communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2010

 Mr. Boozman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve 
   waivers under the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social 
   Security Act that are related to State provider taxes that exempt 
                    certain retirement communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Provider Tax Administrative 
Simplification Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDER TAX RULE EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN CONTINUING CARE 
              RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES.

    In the case of a State that has a provider tax that does not does 
not apply to continuing care retirement communities or life care 
communities (as such terms are used for purposes of section 1917(g) of 
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(g)) that have no beds that are 
certified to provide medical assistance (as such term is defined under 
section 1905(a) of such Act) under title XIX of the Social Security Act 
or that do not provide services for which payment may be made under 
title XIX of the Social Security Act, the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services shall approve a waiver under section 433.68(e)(2)(iii) of 
title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations regardless of whether the 
Secretary determines that the State satisfies the requirements of 
section 433.68(e)(2)(iii)(B) of such title.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Paul W. Adler et al., Appellants, v Shirley Huested et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Rockland County, et al., Respondents.

Appeal by the petitioners from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Hillery, J.), dated August 21, 1989.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Hillery. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Parque La Quinta
Estates (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Deborah J. Koeberl, Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: January 23, 2006                   By: /s/ DEBORAH J. KOEBERL
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Deborah J. Koeberl
                                          Treasurer and Director



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO PARQUE LA QUINTA ESTATES, AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY PARQUE LA QUINTA ESTATES, AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 10.12


 





November 12th, 2019


 


 


Dear Ms Wan,


Cancellation Letter


 


 


I write to inform you
that the Consultancy Agreement between me and Cosmos Group Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") dated July 19th,
2019 (the "Contract" ) is hereby cancelled with effect from July 20th, 2019 and the 1,074,647 shares of the
Company's common under my name shall be transferred back to the Company. The original share certificate will be couriered to you
as soon as practicable.


 


Kind Regards,


 


	/s/ Hung-Yi HUNG                                      
	Hung-Yi HUNG
	 
	 
	 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


I hereby acknowledge the above and the cancellation
of the Contract.


 


 


 


 


 


	/s/ Wan Yuk Chee                                      
	Wan Yuk Chee
	CEO
	For and on behalf of Cosmos Group Holdings, Inc.
---

---

Exhibit 8.1

# List of Subsidiaries

|Company                                  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
|---------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|                                         |                              
|Ceragon Networks (Aus) Pty Ltd           | Australia                    
|Ceragon Networks do Brasil Limitada      | Brazil                       
|Ceragon Networks (UK) Limited            | England                      
|Ceragon Networks SARL                    | France                       
|Ceragon Networks (HK) Limited            | Hong Kong                    
|Ceragon Networks (India) Private Limited | India                        
|Ceragon Networks, S.A. de C.V.           | Mexico                       
|Ceragon Networks, Inc.                   | New Jersey                   
|Ceragon Networks (Philippines), Inc.     | Philippines                  



---

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel General Clinical Research Centers.
    Date: June 20-21, 2001.
    Time: June 20, 2001, 5:00 p.m. to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Garden Inn, Philadelphia Center City, 1100 Arch 
Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
    Contact Person: D.G. Patel, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 
6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, (301) 435-0824, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e7e4f3e2f7e6efc3ede0f1f1adedeaebade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="791d1e09180d1c1539171a0b0b57171011571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10362 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered September 11, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00057 - CV LOU D. VASQUEZ AND N ILDA A. VASQUEZ, Appellant s V. FIREBIRD SFE I, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 05077 - E



### O RDER Befor e the Court is appellant’s motion to extend time to file brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received by the Clerk of the Court Sept ember 9, 2019 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Summary of FY 2010 TIBCO Executive Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 

Summary of FY 2010 TIBCO Executive Incentive Compensation Plan 

The FY 2010 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the “EICP”) of TIBCO Software Inc. (the “Company”) rewards achievement at
specified levels of financial and individual performance. 
 Under the terms of the EICP, each of the Company’s Section 16 Officers
has an assigned target bonus level, expressed as a percent of annual base salary. The target bonus levels recognize competitive industry annual bonus pay practices. Actual bonuses paid will be based upon both the Company’s financial performance
and each participant’s individual performance. Bonuses paid pursuant to the EICP are based on three components: 
  

	 	•	 	 Revenue of the Company. The first component is based on the growth of the Company’s gross revenues in fiscal year 2010.



  

	 	•	 	 Profitability of the Company. The second component is based on the Company’s Non-GAAP Operating Profits Before Tax (OPBT) attained in
fiscal year 2010. 


  

	 	•	 	 Individual Performance. The third component enables the Compensation Committee to award an annual bonus based on discretionary factors such as
the Company’s performance versus its plan and the Company’s performance against its peer group. 


 The Compensation
Committee’s approval of the terms of the EICP shall not be deemed to create an enforceable agreement between the Company and any participant, and the Compensation Committee retains discretion to reduce or refuse to authorize any awards under
the EICP despite attainment of any specific objectives. No rights to any awards shall be deemed to exist unless and until the Compensation Committee authorizes payment of any awards under the EICP following the completion of any fiscal year
measurement periods.
#### UNITED STATES *v.*ROSE

No. 75-1535.

Decided October 12, 1976

Per Curiam.

The operative facts herein are substantially identical to those in *United States*v. *Morrison, ante,*p. 1. Respondent’s ear was stopped by Border Patrol agents; a search disclosed marihuana. Respondent lost a motion to suppress and was found guilty after a bench trial. Following this trial, but before sentencing, the District Court, relying upon our decision in *Almeida-Sanchez*v. *United States,*413 U. S. 266 (1973), granted respondent’s motion to suppress. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, as it did in *Morrison,*found the Government’s appeal barred by double jeopardy.

In *United States*v. *Wilson,*420 U. S. 332 (1975), we held that double jeopardy would not bar a Government appeal if success on that appeal would result in the reinstatement of a verdict of guilty. The fact that the order of suppression here occurred after a general finding of guilt rendered by the court in a bench trial, rather than after a return of a verdict of guilty by a jury, is immaterial. *Morrison, ante,*p. 1. Double jeopardy, therefore, does not bar an appeal by the Government.

We grant the motion to proceed *in forma pauperis*and the petition for certiorari, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand to that court for proceedings consistent herewith.

*It is so ordered.*
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2434-2435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-35,434]


Baker Atlas, Houston, Texas; Notice of Revised Determination on 
Remand

    The United States Court of International Trade accepted the 
Department's motion for voluntary remand to conduct further 
investigation in its negative determination in Former Employees of 
Baker Hughes v. Alexis Herman, U.S. Secretary of Labor, No. 99-07-
00438. As a result of the new investigation, the Department is now 
certifying the workers of Baker Atlas, Houston, Texas as eligible to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade 
Act.
    The February 24, 1999, denial of TAA for workers of the subject 
firm was based on the finding that criterion (3) of the group 
eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Trade Act was not met. 
Workers at the subject firm headquarters and oil equipment production 
facility in Houston were denied because imports of oilfield equipment 
did not contribute to worker separations.
    New investigation findings show that the headquarters staff 
including those workers producing oilfield equipment are directly in 
support of the subject firm's exploration and production of crude oil 
and natural gas.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained on remand, it 
is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with crude oil contributed importantly to the decline in 
sales or production and to the

[[Page 2435]]

total or partial separation of workers at subject firm. In accordance 
with the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I make the following 
revised determination:

    All workers of Baker Atlas, Houston, Texas, who become totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after November 30, 1997 
through two years from the date of this issuance, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of January 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-940 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M