alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP01-246-000]

                    In the Commission's order issued on March 30, 2001,[1]                                          the Commission directed that a technical conference be held to address issues raised by filing.                

Take notice that the technical conference will be held on Tuesday, May 22, 2001, at 10 a.m., in a room to be designated, at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             94 FERC ¶ 61,389 (2001).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 01-10323 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
exv10w25







Exhibit 10.25




Mirion Technologies, Inc.

3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 222

San Ramon, CA 94583




March 18, 2010



[Preferred Stockholder Name and Address]



Ladies and Gentleman:




     This letter agreement (this “Agreement”), entered into between Mirion Technologies,
Inc. (the “Company”) and _______________ (“Holder”), sets forth the understanding of
the parties hereto with respect to the payment by the Company of certain dividends to which Holder
shall be entitled as a holder of shares of the Preferred Stock of the Company in accordance with
Section 3.1 of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (the
“Certificate of Incorporation”).



     The parties agree that all dividends to be paid to Holder in newly issued shares of Preferred
Stock to which Holder is or shall become entitled pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Certificate of
Incorporation that accrue between March 1, 2010 and the date of the conversion of the Preferred
Stock into shares of Class A Common Stock (the “Conversion Date”) shall in lieu and in
complete satisfaction of the Company’s obligations in respect thereof be made by the Company in the
form of a cash payment to the Holder in an amount equal to the product of (x) the number of shares
of Class A Common Stock into which such paid-in-kind dividends would be convertible on the
Conversion Date and (y) the initial public offering price of the shares of common stock of the
Company in the Company’s initial public offering (the “Offering”). Such cash payment shall
be made promptly following the closing of the Offering.



     The provisions of this Agreement may not be amended, modified, waived or terminated without
the written consent of each party hereto. This Agreement shall automatically terminate and neither
party shall have any further obligation hereunder if the Preferred Stock has not converted into
shares of Class A Common Stock on or before April 30, 2010 and if so terminated all entitlements of
the Holder to Preferred Stock dividends from and after March 1, 2010 shall be restored in full.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be
deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same
instrument. This Agreement shall be deemed to be a contract governed by the laws of the State of
Delaware and shall for all purposes be construed in accordance with the laws of such state, without
reference to the conflicts of laws provisions thereof. Any terms used herein that are not herein
defined shall be used herein as defined in the Certificate of Incorporation.



[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]






 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed, by their duly authorized
officers or agents where applicable, as of the same day and year first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MIRION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	HOLDER

 	 
	 	By:  	
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 



[Signature Page to Letter Agreement]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32(2)

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

     -    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
          30, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     -    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: July 31, 2006


/s/ John F. Corcoran
-------------------------------------
John F. Corcoran
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel General Clinical Research Centers.                    

*Date:*                         June 20-21, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         June 20, 2001, 5:00 p.m. to Adjournment.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Garden Inn, Philadelphia Center City, 1100 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107.                    

*Contact Person:*                         D.G. Patel, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, (301) 435-0824, dgpatel@ncrr.nih.gov.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 20, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-10362  Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### *In re*STANCZAK, David L.

(MR 21067)

Bloomington, IL

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to *709Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent David L. Stanczak is suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 6 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk August 6 , 2021

1630 6 7 (51) ( 53 )

POWER WELLNESS MANAGEMENT, LLC,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

and

CHELSEA HEALTH & WELLNESS

FOUNDATION, doing business as 5 HEALTHY

TOWNS FOUNDATION,

Intervenor

- Appellee

, SC: 1630 6 7

v COA: 352226

Tax Tribunal : 18

- 001383

- TT

CITY OF DEXTER,

Respondent

- Appellant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of respondent

- appellant to extend the time

for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on August 2, 2021, is accepted as

timely filed. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Municipal

League to file a brie f amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on August

3 , 2021, is accepted for filing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


          Consent of Independent Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the June 30, 2000 consolidated financial statements
of Comshare, Incorporated and subsidiaries dated July 25, 2000, included in this
Form 10-K Report, into the Company's previously filed Form S-8 and S-3
registration statements (File No. 33-6730, File No. 33-9755-3, File No.
33-28437, File No. 33-27002, File No. 33-37564, File No. 33-85720, File No.
33-87706, File No. 33-87708, File No. 33-86908, File No. 33-65109, File No.
333-91477, File No. 333-91479, File No. 333-93549, File No. 333-93551 and File
No. 333-93553).


                    /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                    -------------------
                        Arthur Andersen LLP

Detroit, Michigan
 September 27, 2000
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-3045

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Kasey Lee Cassady lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

____________ Submitted: June 1, 2021 Filed: June 9, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Kasey Cassady appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled

guilty to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Cassady. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). Furthermore, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion and affirm.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Floyd Whitfield, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the proof in the light most favorable to the People *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, 757, *cert denied*469 US 932), we conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient to support the jury’s determination that defendant was guilty of burglary in the third degree. Defendant’s intent to commit a crime within the building can be inferred from the circumstances of the entry *(see, People v Mackey,*49 NY2d 274, 280; *People v Woodard,*148 AD2d 997; *999
      *People v Privott,*133 AD2d 528, *Iv denied*70 NY2d 936) as well as the property damage discovered within the building *(see, People v Lowman,*137 AD2d 622).

The trial court correctly permitted the prosecutor to impeach Jesse Smallwood by the use of his prior written statement because Smallwood’s trial testimony upon a material issue of this case, namely, the intent to commit a crime within the building, tended "to disprove the position” of the People (CPL 60.35 [1]). Moreover, the trial court immediately gave limiting instructions to the jury that the prior contradictory statement was received only for the purpose of impeaching Smallwood’s credibility, not as evidence-in-chief (CPL 60.35 [2]).

Defendant’s challenge to the entire jury panel was not in writing and is not preserved for our review (CPL 270.10 [2]; *see, People v Prim,*40 NY2d 946, 947; *People v Smith,*148 AD2d 929). In any event, defendant failed to meet his initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of the systematic exclusion of blacks from the jury panel *(see, People v Guzman,*60 NY2d 403, 409, *cert denied*466 US 951).

Defendant failed to object and thus did not preserve for our review the issue of whether a portion of the trial court’s charge impermissibly shifted the People’s burden of proof (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Thomas,*50 NY2d 467) and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6]). (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Reed, J.— burglary, third degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

 

I, Paul V. Dufour, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of IMCO Recycling Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 21, 2004 

 

/s/    Paul V. Dufour
Exhibit 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT MONARCH SERVICES, INC.


                                                                  Percent
                                                Jurisdiction     of Voting
                                                  in Which       Securities
NAME OF CORPORATION                             Incorporated       Owned
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Girls' Life, Inc.                                  Maryland         100%

Creampuffs, Inc.                                   Maryland         100%

Broken Windows, Inc.                               Maryland         100%

Girlslife.com, Inc.                                Maryland         100%

Girls' Life Plantation - Liquor License LLC        Maryland         100%

Girls' Life Plantation - Parcel LLC                Maryland         100%

Girls' Life Plantation - Restaurant LLC            Maryland         100%

Girls' Life Plantation - Plantation Mansion LLC    Maryland         100%
ilK^WocUJLevv M W*V VeV*i ^received IN

V • N/ JUL 312015

^o^^ee J\ v«^v^ AbelAeosia,Clerk

^e. owe, vW. fcf V**K cV&ir^ Sto d^t- 9^ c^ wx^kyvW"
The HONORABLE RICHARD H. BATTEY, Chief Judge, United States

1

District Court for the District of South Dakota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1221

___________

Raymond Earl Osloond, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of South Dakota. 

Theodore J. Vore; Elizabeth A. Benning; *

Sheila R. Aaker; Fred W. Romkema, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: September 8, 1998

 Filed: September 11, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Earl Osloond appeals from the district court&s order granting

1

defendants summary judgment. After careful review of the record and the parties’

briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.
-2-

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6337 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6337

 To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to require 
 each institution with outstanding assistance under the Troubled Asset 
  Relief Program to disclose such fact to the institution's customers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

  Mr. Hensarling (for himself, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, 
  Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mrs. 
    Blackburn, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. 
  Kingston, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Posey, Mr. Pence, Mr. Jordan of 
Ohio, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Fleming, Mr. 
Olson, Mr. Issa, and Mr. Akin) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to require 
 each institution with outstanding assistance under the Troubled Asset 
  Relief Program to disclose such fact to the institution's customers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Truth in Bailouts Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.

    Section 120 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Disclosure Requirement.--
            ``(1) In general.--After the end of the 90-day period 
        beginning on the date of the enactment of the Truth in Bailouts 
        Act, each TARP recipient shall--
                    ``(A) display at each place of business maintained 
                by such recipient a sign or signs disclosing, in a 
                clear and conspicuous manner, the following: `This 
                institution has received financial assistance from the 
                Federal Government under the Troubled Asset Relief 
                Program and has not yet repaid the taxpayers.'; and
                    ``(B) display such disclosure in a clear and 
                conspicuous manner on the main page of such recipient's 
                internet website.
            ``(2) TARP recipient defined.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `TARP recipient' means any financial 
        institution in which the Treasury holds an equity or debt 
        position acquired under TARP.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21309-21310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10753]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting

<BD>AGENCY: <RM>U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

<BD>DATE AND TIME: <RM>Friday, May 4, 2001, 9:30 a.m.

<BD>PLACE: <RM>U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., 
Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

<BD>STATUS:   

<RM>Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of April 13, 2001 Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Director's Report
V. State Advisory Committee Report
    <bullet> Race Relations and Des Moines' New Immigrants (Iowa)
    <bullet> Equal Educational Opportunity for Native American Students 
in Montana Public Schools (Montana)
VI. Future Agenda Items

[[Page 21310]]


<BD>CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: <RM>David Aronson, Press 
and Communications (202) 376-8312.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-10753 Filed 4-25-01; 4:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M