J

- A08016

- 20

NON
- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION
- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

NICHOLAS POSSINGER

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1632 EDA 2019

Appeal from the Order Entered May 13, 2019 , i n the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County , Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 45

- CR

- 0000631

- 2012,

CP

- 45

- CR

- 0001741

- 2013

.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

NICHOLAS POSSINGER

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1749 EDA 2019

Appeal from the Order Entered May 13, 2019 , i n the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County , Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 45

- CR

- 0000631

- 2012,

CP

- 45

- CR

- 0001741

- 2013

.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

NICHOLAS POSSINGER

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 2493 EDA 2019J

- A08016

- 20

- 2

- Appeal from the Order Entered May 13, 2019 , i n the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County , Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 45

- CR

- 001741

- 2013

. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

NICHOLAS POSSINGER

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 2494 EDA 2019 Appeal from the Order Entered May 13, 2019 , i n the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County , Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 45

- CR

- 0000631

- 2012

.

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., KUNSELMAN, J., and McCAFFERY, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY KUNSELMAN, J.: Filed : November 5, 2020
Nicholas Possinger filed four appeals from the same order holding him
in contempt for willfully failing to pay costs and fines. That order arose from
two, unrelated, criminal cases

. We vac ate the order of contempt.
On May 13, 2019, the court of common pleas held Possinger in contempt
for nonpayment of costs and fines, which a trial court and a magisterial

- district
court imposed after he pleaded guilty in two separate, criminal matters. 1

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

1 Possinger pleaded guilty to theft by unlawful taking (18 Pa.C.S.A § 3921(a)) and possession with intent to deliver (35 Pa.C.S.A. §780

- 113(a)(30)). In the first case, 631 CR 2012, Pos s inger was sentenced to pay fines and costs in the amount of $390.50. He was immediately placed on a payment plan of $50 a month. He failed to pay the costs and the matter was sent to the Monroe County Probation Office for collection . In the second case, 1741 CR 2013, Possinger was sentenced to one year of probation, a fine o f $2,500 plus costs, and 50 hours of community service. In August 2016, he entered into aJ

- A08016

- 20

- 3

-

Three weeks later, Possinger timely filed two notices of appeal, in accordance

with Commonwealth v. Walker , 185 A.3d 969 (Pa. 2018) (holding that , after June 1, 2018, separate notices of appeal must be filed for each lower

court docket number). However, P ossinger included both docket numbers on
both of his notices of appeal. Concerned that his appeals may be quashed
for this technicality, Possinger moved the trial court to reinstate his appellate
rights, nunc pro tunc , so he could file new notices of app eal with only one
number on each. The trial court granted his request , and Possinger filed two
additional notices of appeal.

Based on our recent decision s in Commonwealth v. Johnson , ___ A.3d ___, ___ , (Pa. Super. 2020) ( en banc ) (filed July 9, 2020), Slip Opinion

at 12 and Commonwealth v. Larkin , ___ A.3d ___, ___, (Pa. Super. 2020)
( en banc ) (filed July 9, 2020), Slip Opinion at 3 (accord), we conclude that
Possinger’s first two appeals (1632 and 1749 EDA 2019) may proceed,

notw ithstanding his inclusion of both trial

- court docket numbers on his
separate notices of appeal.

However , his subsequent, now

- redundant appeals (2493 and 2494 EDA
2019) must be quashed, because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______ payment plan with the Monroe County Probation Office to pay a minimum of $100 per month. On April 17, 2019, after Possinger failed to make any payments for over a ye ar, a Petition for Rule to Show Cause was issued in both of these matters. It was the first Petition for Contempt filed in these cases. At the time of filing, Possinger still owed $295.50 in the first case and $1,855.00 in the second case. Before the hea ring on May 13, 2019, Possinger’s mother made a $150.00 payment on his behalf.J

- A08016

- 20

- 4

-

nunc pro tunc rel ief on August 26, 2019. Under Rule of Appellate Procedure
1701(a), “after an appeal is taken . . . the trial court . . . may no longer
proceed in the matter.” When a party appeals (if that appeal is from an
appealable order or a final judgment), that app eal divests the trial court of its
original jurisdiction

. See , e.g. , Commonwealth v. Bishop , 829 A.2d 1170
(Pa. Super. 2003).
In his two valid appeals ( i.e. , 1632 and 1749 EDA 2019), P ossinger

raise d three issues all challenging the contempt findings of the trial court. In
response, the Commonwealth filed a letter with this Court indicat ing that the
District Attorney of Monroe County agree d that Possinger is entitled to
appellate relief . Commonwealth’s 12/11/19 Letter to Superior Court. Because

the Commonwealth concedes that under the facts of this case the finding of
contempt should be vacated , we shall do so

. 2 See , e.g. , Commonwealth v.

McNeal , 120 A.3d 313, 328

- 329 (vacating judgments of sentence when

Common wealth concedes the appellant is entitled to relief).

Order of contempt vacated

. Order reinstating appellate rights nunc pro

tunc vacated. Appeals 2493 EDA 2019 and 2494 EDA 2019 quashed.
Jurisdiction relinquished.

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

2 In his brief, Possinger requested that we publish our decision in this matter “because of the substantial, public importance of the issues raised in this appeal.” Possinger’s Brief at 34. Given that our grant of relief rests solely upon the agreement of the parti es, the request for p ublication is DENIED

. Similarly, Possinger’s re quest for oral argument is DENIED as moot.J

- A08016

- 20

- 5

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 11/5/20