alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: April 26, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 2007.
    Contact Person: Tommy L. Broadwater, PhD, Chief, Grants Review 
Branch, NIAMS, NIH, 45 Center Drive, Rm. 5AS25U, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-594-4952.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-10364 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 13.2  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sanofi, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 6, 2014  By:
/s/   Jérôme ContamineJérôme   ContamineExecutive   Vice PresidentChief   Financial Officer (1)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanofi and will be retained by Sanofi and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  
 (1)Principal financial officer.
Order entered June 25, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00684-CV

IN RE ASHLEY LAMBERT CROEL, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-51433-2010

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL 

JUSTICE
#### Jose German BENAVIDES-MOLINA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71258.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 25, 2011.

Ike Nkem Atah Waobikeze, Waobikeze & Associates, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Eric Warren Marsteller, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Theo Nickerson, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the Dis*650trict Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose German Benavides-Molina, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of the motion, and we review de novo questions of law. *Hernandez-Vivas v. INS,*23 F.3d 1557, 1561 (9th Cir.1994). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Benavides-Molina’s second motion to reopen for failure to establish reasonable cause to excuse his failure to appear. *See Hernandez-Vivas,*23 F.3d at 1559. Benavides-Molina did not dispute the hearing notice was sent to the address he provided, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(1) (repealed) (stating that written notice shall be considered sufficient if provided at the most recent address provided by respondent), and he submitted insufficient evidence to support an affirmative defense of nondelivery or improper delivery, *see Arrieta v. INS,*117 F.3d 429, 431 (9th Cir. 1997) (per curiam) (notice of hearing sent to an alien’s last known address may be sufficient).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 19-07

IN RE: ELECTRONIC CASE FILING IN EAJA CASES

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN, LANCE, 

DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Effective November 27, 2007, all new applications and subsequent responses to applications

filed on or after November 27, 2007, for attorneys fees and expenses under the Equal Access to

Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2414(d), will be filed through the Court's electronic filing system.

EAJA pleadings in matters commenced before November 27, 2007, shall be submitted by mail, fax,

or as otherwise permitted by the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Use of the Court's electronic filing system is mandatory for all applicants filing EAJA

applications and responses to EAJA applications, unless they are granted an exemption. Exemptions

will be granted by the Clerk of the Court for good cause only. 

Computer-based training modules explaining the case management/electronic case filing

(CM/ECF) system are available on the Court's website at www.vetapp.gov. 

It is so ORDERED.

DATED: November 8, 2007 BY THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmelo Perez, Appellant.

— Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), rendered on September 16, 1982, to be recalendared before a new panel of this court when perfected and assigned counsel relieved and new counsel assigned, all as indicated. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Patrick G. Blanchard, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on form 10-QSB of Georgia-CarolinaBancshares, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: August 13, 2004
   /s/ Patrick G. BlanchardPatrick G. Blanchard
Exhibit
32.1




Certification


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Sino Clean Energy Inc. (the “Company”), on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the Report fully complies, in all
      material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Baowen RenName:
                Baowen
      RenTitle:
                Chief
      Executive OfficerApril
      9, 2010/s/ Wen (Wendy) FuName:
                Wen
      (Wendy) FuTitle:
                Chief
      Financial OfficerApril
      9, 2010




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. This exhibit is not
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is
instead furnished as provided by applicable rules of the SEC.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT E. WHITE, an individual, and

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

SQUARE, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-17137

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-04539-JST

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 14, 2018

Submission Withdrawn June 7, 2018

Resubmitted September 23, 2019

San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and VITALIANO,** District Judge.

 

Plaintiff Robert E. White appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claim

under California’s Unruh Act based on lack of statutory standing. According to

FILED

SEP 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Eric N. Vitaliano, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
White’s complaint, White visited Square’s website intending to use its services,

encountered terms and conditions that allegedly denied him equal access to its

services, and then left the website without entering into an agreement with Square. 

See White v. Square, Inc., 891 F.3d 1174, 1175-1176 (9th Cir. 2018). The district

court held that White lacked standing under the Unruh Act, and White appealed. 

Because California law in this area was unsettled, we certified a question

respecting this issue to the California Supreme Court, see White v. Square, Inc.,

891 F.3d 1174 , which subsequently responded, see White v. Square, Inc., 446 P.3d

276 (Cal. 2019). 

Applying the California Supreme Court’s ruling, the district court erred in

concluding that White lacked statutory standing. White sufficiently alleged that he

“visited the business’s website, encountered discriminatory terms, and intended to

make use of the business’s services.” See White v. Square, Inc., 446 P.3d at 283. 

Accordingly, White has standing to pursue his Unruh Act claim. Id. 

REVERSED and REMANDED

2
Exhibit
21.1—Subsidiaries of the Registrant





Registrant’s
Subsidiaries:





Xian
Xilan Natural Gas Equipment Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws
of the Peoples’ Republic of China (“PRC”)





Xilan
Energy Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws of Hong
Kong.





Registrant’s Variable
Interest Entity:




Xian
Xilan Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company incorporated under the laws
of the PRC




Subsidiary of the
Registrant’s Variable Interest Entity:





Hubei
Xilan Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws
of the PRC





Lingbao
Yuxi Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws
of the PRC





Shaanxi
Jingbian Liquefied Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed
under the laws of the PRC





Henan
Xilan Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws
of the PRC





Xi’an
Xilan Auto Body Shop Co., Ltd., a limited liability company formed under the laws
of the PRC


Joint Venture of the
Registrant's Variable Interest Entity:
  Henan CNPC Kunlun Xilan Compressed
Natural Gas Co., Ltd., a joint venture company formed by Xian Xilan Natural Gas
Co., Ltd and CNPC Kunlun Natural Gas Company.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Active Power, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John K. Penver, Vice President of
Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ John K. PenverJohn K. PenverVice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryOctober 27, 2009
United States Probation and Pretrial Services

Charter for Excellence

We, the members of Probation and Pretrial Services of the United States Courts,

are a national system with shared professional identity, goals, and values. We facilitate the

fair administration of justice and provide continuity of services throughout the

judicial process. We are outcome driven and strive to make our communities safer and to

make a positive difference in the lives of those we serve. We achieve success through

interdependence, collaboration, and local innovation. We are committed to

excellence as a system and to the principles embodied in this Charter.

We are a unique profession.

Our profession is distinguished by the unique combination of:

A multidimensional knowledge base in law and human behavior;

A mix of skills in investigation, communication, and analysis;

A capacity to provide services and interventions from pretrial release

through post-conviction supervision;

A position of impartiality within the criminal justice system; and

A responsibility to positively impact the community and the

lives of victims, defendants, and offenders.

These goals matter most.

Our system strives to achieve the organizational goals of:

Upholding the constitutional principles of the presumption of innocence and the right against

excessive bail for pretrial defendants by appropriately balancing community safety and

risk of nonappearance with protection of individual liberties;

Providing objective investigations and reports with verified information and

recommendations to assist the court in making fair pretrial release,

sentencing, and supervision decisions;

Ensuring defendant and offender compliance with court-ordered conditions through

community-based supervision and partnerships;

Protecting the community through the use of controlling and correctional

strategies designed to assess and manage risk;

Facilitating long-term, positive changes in defendants and offenders

through proactive interventions; and

Promoting the fair, impartial, and just treatment of defendants and offenders

throughout all phases of the system.

We stand by these values.

Our values are mission-critical:

Act with integrity.

Demonstrate commitment to and passion for our mission.

Be effective stewards of public resources.

Treat everyone with dignity and respect.

Promote fairness in process and excellence in service

to the courts and the community.

Work together to foster a collegial environment.

Be responsible and accountable.

Conceived at the Federal Judicial Center’s 2000 and 2002 National Chiefs’ Conferences.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Innova
Corporation Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      32,245,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,318,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (65,818)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,319,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,866,503
<PP&E>                                      11,314,152
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,491,219)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,924,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,248,187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    86,862,176
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,796,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,924,045
<SALES>                                     10,418,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,418,475
<CGS>                                        7,012,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,012,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,101,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             170,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                389,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                   389,558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   389,558
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.3

                          SARBANES-OXLEY CERTIFICATION

            I, Gerald Holzmann, certify that:

           1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of BMW Vehicle Lease
Trust 2000-A, BMW Auto Leasing LLC, Financial Services Vehicle Trust and BMW
Manufacturing LP;

           2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

           3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

           4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

           5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

Date: September 9, 2003                     By: /s/ Gerald Holzmann
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Gerald Holzmann
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Scott Simpson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edith Miller, J.), rendered on August 12, 1985, unanimously affirmed. Motion by appellant to compel District Attorney to furnish certain minutes denied. No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan and Asch, JJ.