alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1




                                 March 20, 1999

 Ronald L. Koonsman
 1303 Rocky Canyon Road
 Arlington, Texas 76012

          Re:      Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Telephone
                   Warehouse, Inc. ("TWI") and Ronald L. Koonsman ("Koonsman")
                   dated as of June 27, 1997, as amended on April 30, 1998 (the
                   "Agreement")

 Dear Ron:

          This letter will confirm and acknowledge that certain disputes and
 disagreements have arisen between you and TWI with regard to the Agreement
 referred to above. In order to settle and resolve all such disputes and
 disagreements between us, you and TWI agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

          TWI agrees to amend paragraph 6 of the Agreement to exclude from the
 definition of businesses in direct or indirect competition with TWI or its
 affiliates, the sale of wireless communication products at wholesale only.

          You agree to waive your right to the payment of the sum of $652,000.00
 under paragraph 3(b) of the Agreement reflecting the final payment of
 compensation under the Agreement. TWI and you confirm and agree that no further
 amounts are owed to you by TWI under the Agreement and that there are no other
 agreements between you, TWI or its affiliates or parent.

          It is agreed and acknowledged that all other terms and conditions of
 the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

          If this letter reflects your understanding of the agreement, please
sign below where indicated.

                              Very truly yours,

                              TELEPHONE WAREHOUSE, INC.


                              By:
                                 --------------------------------
                                   David H. Eisenberg, CEO



                  Confirmed and agreed to this 20th day of March, 1999


                                 /s/ Ronald L. Koonsman
                                 --------------------------------
                                 Ronald L. Koonsman
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-125167, 333-127102, 333-145302 and333-145303 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 29, 2008 (which reports expressed an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,*Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans*, as of December 31, 2006), relating to the financial statements of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”),and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

 

/s/     Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Des Moines, Iowa 

February 29, 2008
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsALJ Decisions 2024

**ALJ Decisions: 2024**

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard P. Wu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
March 23, 2009




By:
                    /s/
      Richard P. WuRichard
      P. WuPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-14-0000539 

23-JUL-2014 

10:02 AM 

SCWC-14-0000539
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

EDWARD K. NAKAULA, JR., Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-14-0000539; CR. NO. 12-1-0083;


FC-CR. NO. 94-0011; S.P.P. 12-1-0005)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson JJ.)
 

The “Notice of Appeal”, filed on June 10, 2014, which
 

we review as an application for a writ of certiorari, is hereby
 

rejected.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 23, 2014. 

Edward K. Nakaula, Jr.

petitioner pro se
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.            

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector     

Date:    November 9,2005

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]


Regulations Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public 
Notice

April 20, 2001.
    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(h), of 
the receipt of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission 
decisional employees, who make or receive an exempt or a prohibited 
off-the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested on-
the-record proceeding, to deliver a copy of the communication, if 
written, or a summary of the substance of any oral communication, to 
the Secretary.
    Prohibited communications will be included in a public, non-
decisional file associated with, but not part of, the decisional record 
of the proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited 
communication and any responses thereto should become part of the 
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not 
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a 
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or 
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may 
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and 
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant 
such requests only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any 
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record 
communication should serve the document on all parties listed on the 
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with 
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications will be included in the 
decisional record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with 
a cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR 
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of exempt and prohibited off-the-record 
communications received in the Office of the Secretary within the 
preceding 14 days. The documents may be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance.).

Exempt

1. P0-1-49-000; 04-20-01; Greg Deer.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10325 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 9-05

In Re: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN,

LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules) provides for referring cases

under those Rules to a standing panel if the Court decides to establish such a panel on a rotating or

permanent basis. The Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel) was created

on January 27, 2005, by Miscellaneous Order No. 01-05, to consider disciplinary cases coming

before the Court. Upon the retirement of Chief Judge Ivers, a member of the Standing Panel, and

pursuant to Rule 1(c), the membership of the panel shall be redesignated. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective immediately, the Standing Panel will consist of Chief Judge

Greene and Judges Kasold and Hagel.

DATED: September 12, 2005 BY THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Bradley J. Gregory. Sr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8618 and 34-52492]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2006         /s/ Bradley J. Gregory. Sr.,   Bradley J. Gregory. Sr.,   Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Han Yongbin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 22, 2006



By:

/S/    YONGBIN
HANYongbin Han Chief Financial Officer
#### Hall *et*al. v. Farmers and Merchants Bank *et al.*

Appeal from Montgomery City Court, in Equity.

Heard before the Hon. A. D. Sayre.

Gunter & Gunter, for appellants.

R. L. Harmon, for appellees.

*669Opinion by

Sharpe, J.

The bill in this case was filed by J. L. Hall and L. B. Farley, as assignees of a judgment recovered by the receiver of the Farley National Bank' against the Terminal & Improvement Company, against the Farmers & Merchants Bank and the Terminal & Improvement Company, to hold the partnership of the Farmers & Merchants Bank and its members, liable for the money received by it, which was alleged to have been obtained by the Terminal and Improvement Company from the Farley . National Bank in pursuance of a scheme entered into and carried out between the Farmers & Merchants Bank and the Terminal & Improvement Company for the purpose of fraudulently obtaining money from the Farley National Bank. This is the second appeal in the case. On the former appeal, it was held that the complainants7 bill did not present a case of equitable cognizance. Upon the re-, mandment of the cause the complainants amended the bill. The cause was submitted on a motion made by the defendants to dismiss the bill as amended for the want of equity. This appeal is taken from a decree sustaining said motion and ordering the bill dismissed. It is held that the amendment made subsequent to the former decision contains only additional allegations concerning matters already charged in the 7)111, and that said allegations were merely cumulative upon others of the same nature contained in the original bill; and no matter of equitable cognizance has been introduced into the bill by the amendment.

The decree of the chancellor is affirmed on the authority of the *Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Hall,*120 Ala. 14.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GU E VO R G O R OU DJ I AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 72945 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 494- 625 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 4, 2010 ** P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: R Y M E R , W A R D L A W an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G ue vor g O r oudj i an, ana t i ve of I r an a nd c i t i z e n of

R us s i a , pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) s u m m aryd is m is s a l o f h is ap p e a l f o rf a ilu r e to m e an in g f

u llyap p r is e it o f

th e r e a s o n u n d e r ly in g th e ap p e a l,



# FI LED MA R 12 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST hi s di sposi t i on i s w i tho utprej ud i ce t o O roud j i an’ s s ee ki ng t o reopen 1 p r o c e e d in g s in th e B I A to r a is e a n in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l c la im . See S in gh v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 6 7 F .3 d1 1 8 2 , 1 1 8 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . du e to th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n f

o rc o n s id e r a tio n o f

a n u n tim e lyf

ile db r ie f . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1252( a ) ( 2) ( D ) . W e de nythe pe t i t i on. T h e r e c o r dd o e s n o t s up p o rt ac o n c lu s io n th a t O r o u d jian ’s du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts w e r e v io la te d . O r o u d

jian d idn o t la c kn o tic e th a t h is ap p e a l c o u ldb e s u m m ar ily di s m i s s e d f

orf a i l ur e t o f

i l e at i m e l ybr i e f

. F a i l ur e t o f

i l e the br i e f

w a s noton a c c ountof

l a c k of not i c e , buton a c c ountof c ouns e l ’ s a dm i tt e d e rr ori n nots i gni ng the f i r s ts ubm i s s i on and i n nota s s ur i ng tha tthe s i gne d br i e f w oul d m e e tthe d e a d lin e . I n th e s e c ir c u m s tan c e s , w e d e c lin e to f in dadu e p r o c e s s v io la tio n . See R o ja s - G a r c ia v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 3 9 F .3 d8 1 4 , 8 2 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . N or di d the B IA deny O roud j i an a f ul l and fai r heari ng by re j ec t i ng the bri ef in s te a do f

a c c e p tin g h is N o tic e o f A p p e a l. O r o u d

jian ’s N o tic e o f

A p p e a l f

a ile dto s t a t e i t s r e a s oni ng w i th the s pe c i f i c i tyne c e s s aryt o a de qua t e l yappr i s e the B I A of the re as on s f

or appeal . 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 1(d)(2)(i ). 1 S u m m aryd is m is s a l w a s , th e r e f o r e , ap p r o p r ia te . P E T I T I ON DE NI E D.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E XTENSION OF T IME

Appellate case name: LG Chem America, Inc. and LG Chem, Ltd. v. Tommy

Morgan

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00 665

- CV

Trial court case number: 100728

- CV

Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria County

Appellants, LG Chem America, Inc. and LG Chem, Ltd., filed motions for rehearing

and for en banc reconsideration of the Court’s December 15, 2020 opinion. The Court

requested a response to appellants’ motions from appellee, Tommy Morgan, by May 25,

2021.

Appellee has filed an unopposed motion to extend time until June 25, 2021, to file

a response. T he Court grants appellee’s unopposed motion to extend time . Appellee shall

file a response to appellants’ motions for rehearing and for en banc reconsideration, if any,

no later than June 25, 2021.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 3, 2021
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32(1)

                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                            of CNA Surety Corporation
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
          (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

    -   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
        31, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    -   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Dated: May 1, 2006

/s/ John F. Welch
------------------------------------------
John F. Welch
President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.