alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alvin Wilson et al., Respondents-Appellants, v City of Long Beach et al., Appellants-Respondents.

In an action for specific performance of contracts to convey real property, the defendants appeal (1) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), entered December 3, 1986, as granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, and denied, in part, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and (2) from an order of the same court dated February 26, 1987, which denied the defendants’ motion to resettle the order entered December 3, 1986, and the plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much of the order entered December 3, 1986, as declared a portion of a modification agreement dated November 7, 1984, null and void.

Ordered that the cross appeal from the order entered December 3, 1986, is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that on the appeal by the defendants, the order entered December 3, 1986, is modified, by deleting the fourth and fifth decretal paragraphs thereof and so much of the third decretal paragraph as dismissed the second affirmative defense and counterclaim and substituting therefor a provision denying the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment except insofar as it was to dismiss the third affirmative defense and counterclaim; as so modified, the order entered December 3, 1986, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 26, 1987 is dismissed as academic, and because no appeal lies from an order denying resettlement *(see, Blume v Blume,*124 AD2d 771); and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, we conclude that the contracts for the sale of real property entered into between the plaintiffs as purchasers and the defendants as sellers, gave the defendants the right to terminate the contracts if the plaintiffs did not act in good faith and with due diligence in obtaining the necessary permits and financing for the project. The record on appeal raises an issue of fact concerning whether the plaintiffs acted properly under the agreements. Therefore, a trial is warranted to resolve this issue.

*685We further note that even if, after trial, it is determined that the plaintiffs acted in good faith under their contracts, they are not entitled to specific performance unless they can demonstrate that they were ready, willing and able to perform their obligations thereunder on the day that the defendants attempted to terminate the contracts *(see, e.g., Jewell v Rowe,*119 AD2d 634, 635; *Huntington Min. Holdings v Cottontail Plaza,*96 AD2d 526, *affd*60 NY2d 997). Since there is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiffs could fulfill their contractual obligations, this matter must be resolved at trial. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT B

Case 4:23-cv-01892-JST Document 111-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 2
Ahmed v. DHS Status Report

Report: December 13, 2023 Report Date

Data extracted on : December 4, 2023

Date Range: July 1, 2023 - November 29, 2023

Reporting Requirement Data

(i) Total class members whose parole 

applications remained pending when 

expired before extension while I-589 

their initial term of parole expired

is pending and whose asylum 5,008

(ii) Total class members whose parole was extended before expiration 25,463

(iii) Total class members whose parole will expire before the next status report (Feb 12, 2024) 26

Table Notes:

1) This report reflects the most up to date data available at the time the database is queried.

2) Counts may differ from those reported in previous periods due to system updates and post-adjudicative outcomes.

3) This report includes I-589 Applicants who meet the definition in Section 2502(a)(1)(A) of the Extending Government Funding and 

Delivering Emergency Assistance Act, Pub. L. No. 117-43, 135 Stat. 344 (2021)

4) Extended before expiration means the parole was extended or a re-parole application was approved before the original parole 

authorization expired.

5) The reporting date range starts when USCIS began extending parole and adjudicating re-parole applications in July 2023.

Parameters:

Form: I-589

Special Group Code: OAW

Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Data Source: Office of Performance and Quality (OPQ), GLOBAL case tracking system

Case 4:23-cv-01892-JST Document 111-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          59,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  245,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,719,689
<PP&E>                                      17,581,928
<DEPRECIATION>                               (878,187)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,728,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          743,991
<BONDS>                                      8,683,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    613,923
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,686,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,728,148
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,607,028
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               873,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             368,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (875)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   364,197
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David Calkins,  the Chief Executive  Officer of Pacel Corp. (the  "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal  quarter
ended March 31 2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 20, 2003


/s/David Calkins
----------------------------------
David Calkins, CEO and CFO
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Data, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Sanding Tao, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: June 17, 2005


/S/ Sanding Tao

Sanding Tao

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-2001
<CASH>                                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               21,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           167,849
<PP&E>                                                      74,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           2,657,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,886,200
<BONDS>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                        99
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 771,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             2,657,665
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 0
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           1,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (124,665)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (124,665)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (124,665)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.02)



</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2336

_____________________________

DAVID L. NICKELSON,

Appellant,

v.

KEITH R. HARRIS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Jackson County.

Douglas Wade Mercer, Judge.

December 27, 2023

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

David L. Nickelson, pro se, Appellant.
2

No appearance for Appellee.
# Current DACA Pop. Rounded FY23

# Demographics - FY23 COB

# Demographics - FY23 State

# Demographics - FY23 CBSA

# Demographics - FY23 Gender

# Demographics - FY23 Age

# Demographics - FY23 MaritalStat

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image5.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (in thousands) EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          99,714
<SECURITIES>                                    58,097
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,257
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,978
<PP&E>                                          91,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 367,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,106
<BONDS>                                        362,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,396
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                    (81,338)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   367,323
<SALES>                                        140,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,956
<CGS>                                          103,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,663
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.36)
        

</TABLE>
FILED

May 30, 2000

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

IN RE: APPLICATION OF APPALACHIAN SCHOOL OF LAW,

PETITIONER

No. M2000-00053-SC-BLE-CV

ORDER

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7, Article 14.01 the Petitioner, Appalachian School of Law

(hereinafter “ASL”) appeals the denial of the Tennessee Board of Law Examiners to allow graduates

of the ASL to sit for the Tennessee bar exam. 

Petitioner is in its third year of operation. Petitioner avers that “At its August 5, 1999

meeting, the ABA Council on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar found ASL to be in the

requisite ‘substantial compliance’ with the fifty-one (51) ABA Standards for Approval of Law

Schools, including the Programof Legal Education (Standards 301 to 307), with two exceptions: low

admissionsstandards and inadequate institutional finances. Based on those two exceptions, theABA

Council denied ASL’s accreditation application. Since ASL will fully rectify the two exceptions by

no later than August, 2000, ASL is in the process of timely filing a second application for ABA

accreditation which appears will be granted.”

Based upon the denial of accreditation by the ABA, the Tennessee Board of Law Examiners

denied ASL’s request based upon Article II. Section 2.02 states: 

Approval of Law Schools. Each applicant to take the examination must have

completed a course of instruction in and graduated from a regularly organized law

school which is accredited by the American Bar Association, or one which as been

approved by the Board pursuant to Section 2.03.

Section 2.3 allows approval by the Board of only law schools located in Tennessee. ASL is located

in Virginia and not in Tennessee and therefore is not eligible for approval by the Board. No

provision in our rules authorizes approval or investigation by the Board of Law Examiners of law

schools which are not located in this state.

Petitioner requests this Court to reverse the determination of the Tennessee Board of Law

Examiners denying its graduates to sit for the Tennessee bar exam. This Court has considered the

petition of ASL and has concluded that it should be denied.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FIRSTBINGO.COM (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 6th day of June, 2005.



| | /s/ Richard Wachter    
| | -----------------------
| | Richard Wachter        
| | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             170
<SECURITIES>                                        23
<RECEIVABLES>                                      468
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (9)
<INVENTORY>                                          9
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   968
<PP&E>                                             654
<DEPRECIATION>                                     454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              631
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1246
<SALES>                                            732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   732
<CGS>                                              703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    38
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Johnson, Also Known as Mark Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J.), rendered on January 18, 1987, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is denied. No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 07-23

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

O R D E R

Pursuant to Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules), the Court 

created a Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel) to consider accusations of 

professional misconduct coming before the Court. The Court's March 11, 2011, Resolution 

regarding the Standing Panel provides that each August, "the longest serving member of the 

Standing Panel shall be removed automatically from the Standing Panel with regard to any new 

cases assigned to the Standing Panel." It further provides that, if there are no active judges who 

have not yet been designated as a member of the Standing Panel, the Clerk shall designate as the 

next member of the Standing Panel "the regular active judge with the longest period of time since 

last service as a regular member of the Standing Panel."

Judge Falvey is currently the longest serving member of the Standing Panel, there are no 

active judges who have not yet been designated as a member of the Standing Panel, and Judge 

Greenbergis the regular active judge with the longest period of time since last service as a member 

of the Standing Panel. Accordingly, the current Standing Panel, comprised of Judges Falvey,

Laurer, and Jaquith will be reconstituted effective the date of this order, to be comprised of Judges

Greenberg, Laurer, and Jaquith.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective the date of this order, the Standing Panel consists of Judges 

Greenberg, Laurer, and Jaquith.

DATED: August 31, 2023 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

11:00 a.m., Friday, May 18, 2001.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-10076 Filed 4-19-01; 11:23 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Presidential Documents

20585

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 79

Tuesday, April 24, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 01–13 of April 17, 2001

Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding

the Palestine Liberation Organization

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority and conditions contained in section 538(d) of

the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2001, Public Law 106–429, I hereby determine and certify that

it is important to the national security interests of the United States to

waive the provisions of section 1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987,

Public Law 100–204.

This waiver shall be effective for a period of 6 months from the date

hereof. You are hereby authorzed and directed to transmit this determination

to the Congress and to publish in in the Federal Register.

[FR Doc. 01–10261

Filed 4–23–01; 8:45 am]

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, April 17, 2001.

W

Billing code 4710–10–M
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 1-06

In Re: COMMITTEE ON ADMISSION AND PRACTICE

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN,

LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED that Mary Ann Flynn, Esq., is appointed as a member of the Committee on

Admission and Practice for a term expiring November 19, 2008 (A&P Rule 2(a)(3)), replacing

Melanie G. Dorsey, whose term expired on November 19, 2005, but was extended under A&P Rule

2(a)(2) until a successor was appointed.

DATED: January 24, 2006 BY THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge