alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Annual Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the year ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald Wilen,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, thAT:

   (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:   July 29, 2003              By: /s/ Ronald Wilen
                                        --------------------
                                          Ronald Wilen
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sanford M. Kimmel,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:   July 29, 2003              By: /s/ Sanford M. Kimmel
                                       -------------------------
                                         Sanford M. Kimmel
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       2
# Instructions for Electronic Filing of Form I-90 (Renew or Replace a Green Card Online)

#### Archived Content

The information on this page is out of date. However, some of the content may still be useful, so we have archived the page.

The steps to e-File this form are:
                
                - 	Be sure to read the  form instructions  (PDF, 272.09 KB)  first.
                
                - 	Check the "E-Filing Eligibility" chart below to see if you are eligible to e-File.
                
                - 	If you are eligible, go to the  Online Filing  page and fill out Form I-90 online.
                
                - 	Once payment is made, we will provide you with an electronic confirmation receipt that:                   	
                  - 		Includes your receipt number.	
                  	
                  - 		Tells you where to mail the required supporting documents listed in the form instructions. If you do not send the required documents to the address listed on the confirmation receipt, your application may be delayed or denied.	
                  	
                  - 		USCIS will mail you a Form I-797C, Notice of Action.  This is the notice you should use as evidence that you filed this application.  If biometric services are required, we will send you an appointment notice to appear at an Application Support Center.	
                   
                
                - 	The USCIS office where your case is assigned will adjudicate your application.
                

**E-Filing Eligibility**

**Filing Fee**

The cost to e-File this form is $450, which includes a $365 form filing fee and an $85 biometric services fee.

**Concurrent E-Filing.**

**Form I-90 cannot be e****-****Filed concurrently with other forms****.**

**Change of Address**

If you have e-Filed a form and need to update your address, please refer to our Change of Address Information webpage.

01/07/2015

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 33.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Central,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  November  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Terrence J. Leifheit President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Terrence J. Leifheit
-----------------------------
Terrence J. Leifheit
President and Chief Executive Officer
January 15, 2004



                                       28
#### Alice M. DEANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 10-1977.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 2011.

Decided: May 5, 2011.

Alice M. Deane, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn C. Carver, Assistant Regional Counsel, Allyson Sinclair Jozwik, Maija Pelly, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alice M. Deane appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s summary judgment motion in her action seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits under the Social Security Act. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Deane’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Deane has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

 To the extent Deane seeks to submit evidence she did not present in the administrative proceeding, we decline to consider it. *See Smith*v. *Chater, 99*F.3d 635, 638 n. 5 (4th Cir. 1996).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESVIN OCTAVIO BONILLA BARRIOS, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-70229 

Agency No. A206-912-674 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 20, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Esvin Octavio Bonilla Barrios, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order affirming the decision of an 

asylum officer during expedited removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 24 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-70229 

by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the removal order because it was issued 

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and none of the exceptions to the restriction on 

judicial review of expedited removal orders apply. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(A)(iii) (“[N]o court shall have jurisdiction to review” determinations 

made under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(B)); Pena v. Lynch, 815 F.3d 452, 455-56 (9th 

Cir. 2016) (concluding that this court generally lacks jurisdiction to review 

removal orders issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and describing the limited 

exceptions).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906CERTIFICATIONS**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended April 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William J. Fair, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| Date: June 13, 2007 |                                  |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                     |                                  |
|                     | By:  /s/ William J. Fair         |   |
|                     | William J. Fair                       |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 03-19

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled by 

the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge Lawrence B. Hagel, 

having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The 

Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Hagel would provide substantial 

service necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective February 1, 2019 through May 2, 2019, recall-eligible retired 

Judge Hagel is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). Judge 

Hagel shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active 

service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief 

Judge. It is further

ORDERED that Judge Hagel shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2019 for up to 

90 days or its equivalent to review and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court 

and to perform other substantial service at the request of the Chief Judge. With Judge Hagel's 

consent, service may be extended beyond 90 days. 

DATED: January 15, 2019 BY THE COURT:

ROBERT N. DAVIS

Chief Judge
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Friendly Energy Exploration (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas Tallant, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Douglas Tallant By: Douglas Tallant Chief Executive Officer  Dated: June 14, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**List of Subsidiaries of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.**

 

Iowa Telecom Communications, Inc., an Iowa corporation 

d/b/a Iowa Telecom 

 

Iowa Telecom Technologies, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company 

 

Iowa Telecom Data Services, L.C., an Iowa limited liability company 

 

IT Communications, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company 

d/b/a Iowa Telecom 

 

IWA Holdings, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company 

 

IWA Services, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company 

 

Baker Communications, Inc., an Iowa corporation 

 

Montezuma Mutual Telephone Company, an Iowa corporation
**Exhibit 8.****1**

 

**LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **Subsidiaries**                                                                   | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                                               |       |                              |
| Hydrogenics  Test Systems Inc. (formerly Greenlight Power Technologies, Inc.) |       | Canada                            |
|                                                                               |       |                              |
| Stuart  Energy Systems Corporation                                                 |       | Canada                            |
|                                                                               |       |                              |
| Hydrogenics  Europe NV                                                             |       | Belgium                           |
|                                                                               |       |                              |
| Hydrogenics  GmbH                                                                  |       | Germany                           |

 

----
### The Honorable Michael James Davis, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report an d recomm endations of the Honorable J. Earl Cudd, United State s Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. ___________ No. 95-2450

___________ George E. Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., P.M.G., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 5, 1996 Filed: July 12, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
George E. Smith appeals from the district court's grant of summary 1 judgmen t to the United States Postal Service (USPS) in his employmen t discrimination action . The district court concluded Smith could not make out a p rima facie case of race discrimination or reprisal as he had no t shown any adverse employment action. On appeal, Smith argues he shoul d have been afforded the opportunity to conduct discovery. We affirm.
Reviewing de novo, we agree with the district court that Smith failed to prove he suffered an adverse employment action. See Landon v. Northwes t Airlines, Inc. , 72 F.3d 620, 624 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review; prim a facie case for race

### -2-

discrimination); Evans v. Kansas City, Mo. Sch. Dist. , 65 F.3d 98, 100 (8t h Cir. 1995) (prima fac ie case for retaliation claim), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 1319 (1996). We reject Smith's contention that summary judgment was entered prematurely; Smith neither requested a continuance under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f), nor submitted an affidavit explaining why he needed additional time for discovery. See Federal Rule of Civi l Proc edure 56(f); Puckett v. Cook , 864 F.2d 619, 622 (8th Cir. 1989)
. Moreover, Smith had seven months in which to con duct discovery before USPS moved for summary judgment, and USPS did not move for summary judgmen t until after the original deadline for discovery had passed. See Bright v. Stan dard Register Co. , 66 F.3d 171, 172 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam ) (summa ryjudgment not premature where plaintiffs had months to complet e discovery before moti on was filed, and after motion was filed, plaintiffs neither moved for dis covery continuance nor attempted to complete desired discovery).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification        of the President and**

**the        Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant        to 18 U.S.C. Section1350,**

**as        Adopted Pursuant to Section906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002**

|   | a)     | This                  amendment to the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for                  the                  quarterly period ended December31, 2007 fully complies with the                  requirements of Section13(a)or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | b)     | The                  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company.                                                                            |

| By:    | /s/                  Wo Hing Li |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Wo                  Hing Li     |
|   | President                       |

| By:    | /s/                  Leada Tak Tai Li    |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   | Leada                  Tak Tai Li        |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer |

A        signed        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided        to        China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel,        Inc.        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon        request.

----
<PAGE>









                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tropical Sportswear
Int'l Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, N. Larry McPherson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.




                                           /s/ N. Larry McPherson
                                           ------------------------------
                                           N. Larry McPherson
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           May 5, 2003




* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation and will be retained by
Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 99-50521 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROLAND FERDIN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-93-CR-185-5-HG

- - - - - - - - - - June 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roland Ferdin appeals the 24-month sentence imposed by the district court upon revocation of his supervised release. Ferdin argues that his sentence violates due process because it was based on “unsubstantiated and unverified factual information.” Because this contention is raised for the first time on appeal, it is reviewed only for plain error. See United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 730-37 (1993); United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we perceive no plain error.No. 99-50521 2– AFFIRMED.