alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 

15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 

 

I, Ross A. Goolsby, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SigmaTel, Inc., aDelaware corporation, for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: April 20, 2004
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 98-1491

SHIRLEY D. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,

 V.

TOGO D. WEST, JR.,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY,

HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

Pursuant to this Court's invitation in a June 6, 2000, order, counsel for the plaintiffs in a class

action, of which appellant is a member, in the United States District Court for the Northern District

of California, has filed what is styled as an "Amicus Curiae Brief of Counsel for the Certified

Plaintiff class in Nehmer v. U.S. Veterans Administration." That "Brief" does not address the merits

of this case, but rather urges this Court to stay further proceedings to await the appellant's exhaustion

of her remedies in the class action. A question arises whether it would be appropriate for the Court

to accept the "Brief" for filing. SeeRule 29 and the incorporated provisions of Rule 28 of the Court's

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. An additional question is presented: Whether counsel, as

amicus, has standing to request a stay of proceeding.

The Court notes that neither the appellant nor the Secretary has responded to amicus' request

for stay.

On consideration of the foregoing, the parties, within 15 days of the date of this order, are

requested to file a response to amicus' request for stay, and in their responses to address the above

questions.

DATED: July 21, 2000 PER CURIAM.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Friendly Energy Corporation(the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"),





I,
      Douglass Tallant, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
      14th
      day April 2008.





/s/
                Douglas TallantDouglas
                Tallant, President/Director
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2





ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF 
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS


THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (this “Assignment”) is made and entered into as of September 16, 2019, by RREEF AMERICA L.L.C, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”), and RPT PROVIDENCE SQUARE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”).


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, 4101 Roswell Road (Marietta), LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Seller”), and Assignor entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated as of August 8, 2019 (the “Agreement”), with respect to certain real property located in Cobb County, Georgia; and


WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign all of its right, title and interest in and to the Agreement to Assignee, and Assignee desires to accept such assignment from Assignor.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, Ten and No/100 U.S. Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by Assignor and Assignee, Assignor and Assignee agree as follows:


1.    Assignment.  Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in, to and under the Agreement.


2.     Assumption.  Assignee hereby assumes all of Assignor’s obligations, duties and liability under the Agreement.


3.    Permitted Transferee.  In accordance with Section 21 of the Agreement, Assignor and Assignee hereby represent and warrant that Assignee is a Permitted Transferee (as defined in the Agreement).


4.    Governing Law.  This Assignment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Georgia.


5.    Binding Effect.  This Assignment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.


6.    Counterparts.  This Assignment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.


[Signature Page Follows]


    
LEGAL02/39163222v1







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have caused this Assignment to be executed under seal, all as of the day and year first above written.




ASSIGNOR:


RREEF AMERICA, L.L.C.,
a Delaware limited liability company


By: /s/ Jeff Anderson
Name: Jeff Anderson
Title: Vice President


By: /s/ Anne-Marie Vandenberg
Name: Anne-Marie Vandenberg
Title: Director






ASSIGNEE: 


RPT PROVIDENCE SQUARE, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company


By: /s/ Jeff Anderson
Name: Jeff Anderson
Title: Authorized Signatory 


By: /s/ Anne-Marie Vandenberg
Name: Anne-Marie Vandenberg
Title: Authorized Signatory






    
LEGAL02/39163222v1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Required Data Elements for Paternity Establishment 
Affidavits.
    OMB No.: 0970-0171.
    Description: The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
Reconciliation Act of 1996 required the Secretary of the Department of 
Health and Human Services to Specify the minimum data elements of an 
affidavit to be used for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity. 
States must enact laws requiring the development and use of the 
affidavit and to give full faith and credit to affidavits signed in any 
other State according to its procedures.
    Respondents: State birth record agencies and State Child Support 
Offices.

                                              Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of    Average burden
                   Instrument                        Number of    responses  per     hours per     Total burden
                                                    respondents      respondent      response          hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affidavit.......................................       2,000,000           .2243            .166          74,468
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 74,468.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., 
Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Desk Officer for ACF.

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
Bob Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10234 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of  Tropical
Sportswear  Int'l  Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the quarter  ended July 3,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Robin  Cohan,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of
the Company.

                                            /s/ Robin J. Cohan
                                            Robin J. Cohan
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                            August 11, 2004
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,983
<INVENTORY>                                     47,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,585
<PP&E>                                         289,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,695
<BONDS>                                        321,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (95,402)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,567
<SALES>                                        144,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,617
<CGS>                                          125,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   671
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,493
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (691)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (735)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
  **CERTIFICATION**
 
  I, Michael A. Maltzman, certify that:
  1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 of Stratus Services Group, Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 
 a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 
 a.
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
  Date: February 14, 2005
/s/ Michael A. MaltzmanMichael A. MaltzmanVice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### William Cunningham *versus*Joseph Turner *& al.*

In an action upon a poor debtor’s bond, where the justices have examined the notification to the creditor, and have found it to be in conformity with the law, their decision upon this point is conclusive ; and it is not competent for the plaintiff to go behind their certificate, and raise subsequently any question as to the sufficiency of the notice, for the purpose of showing that the oath was improperly administered.

Debt on a poor debtor’s bond.

Two justices of the quorum certified, that the said Turner presented himself, and we the said justices, having examined the notification and return thereon, and having found the same regular and in due form, have proceeded in the examination of said Turner in the way and manner by statute provided, and upon the whole examination, being satisfied that said Turner’s disclosure is true, and that he is entitled to the benefit of the act aforesaid, have proceeded to administer to him the oath by statute provided, and have made out and delivered to him a certificate thereof under our hands and seals, directed to the gaoler of said county, “ according to the form of the statute in such case made and provided.”

These proceedings were read in evidence at the trial, and the plaintiff then proposed to introduce evidence tending to show, that at the time of administering the oath, a surety on the bond had in his hands and possession, real estate belonging to the principal. To the admission of this evidence the defendants objected, but the Judge presiding at the trial overruled the objection, and admitted the testimony.

*436After the evidence had been closed, the cause was • taken from the jury by consent of parties, who agreed, that if in the opinion of the Court the ruling was correct, the defendants were to be defaulted, if the defendants were liable upon the facts. But if in the opinion of the Court, the ruling was not correct, or that upon the other evidence the action could not be maintained, the plaintiff was to become nonsuit.

*W.*Kelley, argued for the plaintiff.

*W. G.*Crosby, for the defendants,

cited 13 Serg. & R. 254; *Agry*v. *Betts, 3*Fairf. 415; *Haskell*v. *Haven,*3 Pick. 404 ; *Black*v. *Ballard,*13 Maine R.239; *Parkman*v. *Crosby,*16 Pick. 302; 4 Cranch, 421; *Livermore*v. *Boswell,*4 Mass. R. 438.

By the Court.

We have decided in the case of *Cary*v. *Osgood fy al.*18 Maine R. 152, that where the justices have examined the notification to'the creditor, and have found .it to be in conformity with the law, their decision upon this point is conclusive; and that it is not competent for the plaintiff to go behind their certificate, and raise subsequently any question as to the sufficiency of the notice. The certificate of the justices in this case is, that the principal caused the creditor to be notified according to law. Having thereupon administered to him the oath, the condition of the bond was performed, and the evidence on the part of the plaintiff which was objected to, was not legally admissible.

*Judgment for the defendants.*
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

M1sc. No. 07-14 

IN RE: RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 

ORDER 

It is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 40(b) and (c)(1) and (c)(2) ofthe Court's Rules of Practice 

and Procedure, that the following members of the Court's bar have been reappointed by the Board 

of Judges to serve on the Court's Rules Advisory Committee for a term as indicated: 

Chair Linda E. Blauhut, Esq., of Washington, DC, for a term ending November 9, 2016 

Thomas E. Sullivan, Esq., of Washington, DC, for a term ending January 10, 2017. 

DATED: October 23, 2014 FORTH OURT:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3109

_____________________________
M ICHAEL J

. F ARRELL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , et al.,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circui t Court for Bay County

. Michael C. Overstreet , Judge

.
March 29 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRM ED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and B ILBREY and J AY , concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App . P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant; Michael J. Farrell, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for A ppellee.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus SALAS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-11171

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Sherylynn Ann Kime-Goodwin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jesus Salas, Jr., presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. Shabazz,*633 F.3d 342, 345-46 (5th Cir.2011), which held that the phrase “on any such revocation” in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) does not impose an aggregate limit on imprisonment for revocation of supervised release but limits only the amount of imprisonment that may be imposed each time a court revokes a defendant’s supervised release. He raises the arguments solely to preserve them for further review. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motions to dismiss and for an extension of time to file a brief are DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### *In re*MOLL, Kenneth Brian

(MR 20918)

Chicago, IL

Order of the Court:

The petition by respondent Kenneth Brian Moll for leave to file exceptions to the report and recommendation of the Review Board is allowed. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days. Suspension effective October 11, 2006. Respondent Kenneth Brian Moll shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.