alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  |  (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  |  (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                   |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April                11, 2008 |                                                   | /s/                 ROBERT T. FABER   |
|                                     | Robert                T. Faber                         |
|                                     | *President                and Chief Executive Officer* |

----
China Packaging Technologies, Inc. - Exhibit 10.31 - Filed by
   newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.31 

Lease Agreement 

(English Summary) 

	Date of Signing 	       
                 Jan 1, 2010 
	Lease Parties 	                   Shengda
      Color as lessee and Zhejiang Shuang Ke Da Weaving Co., Ltd. as lessor
  
	Lease Address 	       
                 Xiang He Qiao Village, He Shang
      Town, Xiaoshan District 
	Lease Area 	       
                 30,661 sqm 
	Term 	       
                 From Jan 1, 2010 to Dec 31, 2012
    
	Rent 	       
                 RMB 1.2 million per annual,
      payable before Dec 31 of each calendar year 
	
      Termination 
	
      During the term of the Agreement, if lessee terminate the
      lease agreement, the lessor shall have the right to decide if this
      Agreement will be continued or terminated. In this circumstance, if lessor
      decides to terminate the Agreement, lessor shall notify lessee in writing.
      Lessee shall make sure the validity of its mailing address and notify
      lessor of any change of mailing address in writing, otherwise, when lessor
      sends the notice to lessee’s designated mailing address, the return date
      of the mail shall be deemed as the notice date.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Milliner, Also Known as Eddie Jones, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.), rendered February 22, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The testimony of the complainant, who had ample opportunity to view the defendant during the commission of the crime, was, in and of itself, sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction *(see, People v McCrimmon,*131 AD2d 598). The trier of fact was entitled to give great weight to the complainant’s testimony and to reject that of the defendant and his alibi witnesses *(see, People v McCrimmon, supra).*

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions, including those in his *pro se*brief, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Joseph J. Raymond, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of Stratus Services Group, Inc., (the “Company”),do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge the foregoing QuarterlyReport of the Company:

 

1.                                       fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and;

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  October 14, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Joseph  J. Raymond                 |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Joseph J.  Raymond                     |
|                          |   | Chairman of  the Board of Directors,   |
|                          |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2191 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 

United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 

breast cancer research, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. DOLD, Ms. ESTY, Mr. GARAMENDI, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. HECK of Washington, Mr. HIGGINS, 

Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Ms. 

MATSUI, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MEEKS, Mrs. NOEM, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

PIERLUISI, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. SABLAN, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONYERS, 

Mr. FARR, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. MOORE, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. SMITH

of Washington, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. PINGREE, Ms. LEE, Mr. STIVERS, 

and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in 

addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the United States Postal Service to issue a 

semipostal to raise funds for breast cancer research, 

and for other purposes. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2191 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Re5 search Stamp Reauthorization Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CAN7 CER RESEARCH. 

8 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 

10 SEC. 3. ENSURING THAT FUNDS GENERATED BY SPECIAL 

11 POSTAGE STAMP SALES ARE USED FOR 

12 BREAST CANCER RESEARCH. 

13 Section 414(c)(1) of title 39, United States Code, is 

14 amended in the matter following subparagraph (B) by 

15 adding at the end the following: ‘‘An agency that receives 

16 amounts from the Postal Service under this paragraph 

17 shall use the amounts for breast cancer research.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Qinan
Ji, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Qinan Ji
--------------------------------
Qinan Ji
Principal Executive Officer
April 16, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND RULE 13a  14(b) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Bradley J. DodsonName: Bradley J. Dodson
Date: February 20, 2009
**Exhibit
        32.1** ****
 **STATEMENT
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
        Winston Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of Winsonic Digital Media Group,
        Ltd.
        (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (a)
        The
        Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A Amendment No. 1 of the Company for the year
        ended
        December 31, 2004, to which this certification accompanies (the "Annual
        Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (b)
        The
        information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: *December
                23, 2005*
              By:
              /s/ *Winston
                Johnson,**Winston
                Johnson,**Chief
                Executive Officer*
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. and
        will
        be retained by Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6028 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prohibit treatment of 

the Gray Wolf as an endangered species or threatened species. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2010 

Mr. EDWARDS of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prohibit 

treatment of the Gray Wolf as an endangered species 

or threatened species. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TREATMENT OF GRAY WOLF 

4 AS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES OR THREAT5 ENED SPECIES. 

6 Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

7 (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new paragraph: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6028 IH

1 ‘‘(4) The Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) shall not be treat2 ed as an endangered species or threatened species for pur3 poses of this Act.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
---

---

Exhibit 1.1

MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION Amended as of October 25, 2007
 (Translation from Hebrew)

|1. | Name
of the Company Giganet Ltd. (in English)
|-- | ---------------------------------------------

|2. | Purposes
for which the Company was founded:
|-- | -------------------------------------------

| | Development,
production and marketing of products in the field of electronics.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | The
responsibilities of the members are limited.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------

|4. | The
registered share capital of the Company is Six Hundred Thousand New Israeli
          Shekels (NIS 600,000) divided into Sixty Million (60,000,000) Ordinary Shares
of           a nominal value of One Agora (NIS 0.01) each. [Amended October 25, 2007.]
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We, the undersigned hereinbelow, wish
to incorporate as a company according to this Memorandum of Association and agree that
each of us will take the number of Company share capital listed next to our names.

|Name of Signatories    | Identity No. | Address              | Number of Shares | Signature
|---------------------- | ------------ | -------------------- | ---------------- | ---------
|
|
|
|
|Yehuda Zisapel         | 007146054    | Kisufim 23, Tel Aviv | 10178            | /s/      
|Zohar Zisapel          | 008792566    | Alon 2, Ramat Efal   | 10178            | /s/      
|Total Number of Shares |              |                      | 20356            |          

Dated: This 11day of July, 1996.

Witness to signatures:

|/s/
Amit Wengrowicz, Advocate
|-------------------------------------------



---

---
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Emageon Inc.
hereby individually certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Emageon Inc. In witness whereof, each of the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certification on
this 30th day of March, 2006. /s/ Charles A. Jett, Jr.
    
    
    
    /s/ W. Randall PittmanCharles A. Jett, Jr.
    
    
    
    W. Randall PittmanChief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.4

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and  Investor
Protection  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted),  Gary D. Wrench,  the
Chief Financial Officer of OpticNet, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   The  Company's  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for the  period  ended
          September 28, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
          99.4 (the "Annual  Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of
          Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition of the Company at the end
          of the period  covered by the Annual  Report and results of operations
          of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.

Dated:    January 7, 2003
          ---------------

/s/ Gary D. Wrench
-------------------------
Gary D. Wrench
Chief Financial Officer
#### Sysco Corporation et al., Respondents, v Town of Hempstead et al., Appellants.

In an action to declare the imposition of ad valorem assessments for garbage district purposes against the plaintiffs’ properties to be in violation of Town Law § 198 (9) (b), and to be in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution and NY Constitution, article I, § 11, the appeal, as limited by the appellants’ brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), dated September 4, 1986, as upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying the appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

*752Ordered that the order is modified, by adding thereto a provision that the branch of the motion which was to dismiss the plaintiffs’ first cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) is deemed a motion for summary judgment as to that cause of action, that branch of the motion is granted, and upon resolution of the remaining issues in the case, the appellants shall be entitled to a provision in the judgment determining the action declaring ad valorem assessments by a refuse and garbage district to provide garbage collection services to be permissible pursuant to Town Law § 198 (9) (b) and § 202 (3); as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the order of the same court, dated July 9, 1986, which denied the appellants’ motion, is modified accordingly.

The allegations of the complaint alleging violations of statute and the Federal and State Constitutions, when considered as true, demonstrate the existence of a bona fide justiciable controversy which should be settled. Thus, the plaintiffs have made a sufficient showing to withstand the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint *(see,*CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; *Guggenheimer v Ginzburg,*43 NY2d 268, 275; *Metropolitan Package Store Assn. v Koch,*89 AD2d 317, 322, *mot to dismiss appeals granted*58 NY2d 1112, *appeal dismissed*464 US 802, *reh denied*464 US 1003).

However, as the plaintiffs conceded on oral argument of this appeal, with respect to the first cause of action, a review of the legislative history and wording of Town Law § 198 (9) (b) and § 202 (3) leads to the conclusion that the latter statutory provision provides that ad valorem assessments for garbage collection services may be imposed by a garbage district. The former section provides an alternative discretionary means of financing such services, namely, user charges *(see, L*1941, ch 263, § 15; L 1946, ch 709, § 1). In light of that concession, the branch of the motion which was to dismiss the first cause of action should be deemed one for summary judgment with respect thereto, and in the final judgment, and appropriate declaration should be made *(see, Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334, *appeal dismissed*371 US 74, *cert denied*371 US 901). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 07-08

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGES

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), and in order to meet the needs of the Court, recalleligible retired Judge John J. Farley, III, and Judge Donald L. Ivers, are recalled to perform

substantial service to the Court. The Court requires Judge Farley and Judge Ivers to assist in

reviewing and deciding an unprecedented number of appeals now pending before the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective on or about October 1, 2008, Judge John J. Farley, III, and

Judge Donald L. Ivers, shall commence service as judges of the Court.

DATED: August 20, 2008 BY THE COURT:

/s/ William P. Greene, Jr.

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**List of Subsidiaries of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.**

 

Iowa Telecom Communications, Inc., an Iowa corporation 

d/b/a Iowa Telecom 

 

Iowa Telecom Technologies, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company 

 

Iowa Telecom Data Services, L.C., an Iowa limited liability company 

d/b/a ACG Solutions, LLC 

 

ITCommunications, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company 

d/b/a Iowa Telecom 

 

IWA Holdings, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company 

 

IWA MC, Inc., an Iowa corporation
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 10-21

IN RE: RULES OF PRACT ICE AND PROCEDURE

O R D E R

 Pursuant to the authority of 38 U.S.C. § 7264(a) and consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 2071(b), 

the Court has determined that Rule 30(a) (CITATION OF CERTAIN AUTHORITY) ofits Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (Rules) should be revised to bring it more clearly in line with Rule 32.1(a) of 

the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and make it clearer that citing precedential 

decisions is not prohibited or restricted. The proposed revisions were developed in 

collaboration with the Court's Rules Advisory Committee.

 Accordingly, it is

 ORDERED that the attached proposed revisions to the Court's Rules are hereby published 

for public comment for a period of 30 days. Comments must be submitted to the Clerk of the 

Court by July 26, 2021, at comments@uscourts.cavc.gov or to 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, 

Suite 900, Washington, DC 20004. 

DATED: June 25, 2021 FOR THE COURT: 

/s/Gregory O. Block 

GREGORY O. BLOCK 

Clerk of the Court 

Attachment:

Proposed Revised Rule
Proposed revision to U.S. Vet. App. Rule 30(a)

(a) Citation of Nonprecedential Authority. Parties, intervenors, and amicus curiae may cite

nonprecedential dispositions by any court for the persuasive value of the court’s analysis.

Parties, intervenors, and amicus curiae citing such a disposition shall identify any clear

precedent on point (or state that none exists) and explain how the nonprecedential disposition

applies to the case before the court. With the exception of dispositions available in a publicly

accessible electronic database, a copy of any cited unpublished disposition shall be attached to

the document containing the citation.
#### Anita Schanback, Respondent, v Martin Schanback, Appellant.

— In a matrimonial action, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), dated October 9, 1986, which, upon renewal, granted the plaintiffs motion for upward modification of maintenance.

Ordered that the order is modified, as an exercise of discretion, by (1) deleting therefrom the provision directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff as and for maintenance an additional sum of $150 per week, and substituting therefor a provision directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff as and for maintenance an additional sum of $50 per week for the period April 4, 1986 through October 12, 1986, and (2) deleting therefrom the provision directing the defendant to thereafter pay an additional sum in the amount of $350 per week until such time as the defendant has delivered to the plaintiff a certified check in the sum of $827,628, or until further court order, and substituting therefor a provision directing the defendant to thereafter pay the plaintiff an additional sum of $200 per week (for a total of $250 per week) until resolution of *621the economic issues between the parties by the Supreme Court, Nassau County, and the entry of a judgment thereon *(see, Schanback v Schanback,*130 AD2d 332 [decided herewith]); as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court, Nassau County, had the authority to modify the interim maintenance award set forth in the judgment determining the economic issues between the parties, dated February 25, 1986, which was to continue in full force and effect until such time as the defendant paid the first installment of the cash distributive award or until further court order. However, we conclude that the upward modification granted by the court was excessive to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.