alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 98-1244

MARY ANN TETEN, APPELLANT,

 V.

TOGO D. WEST, JR.,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before FARLEY, IVERS, and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

 The appellant appeals a May 5, 1998, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals, and that

case is currently pending before the Court. On July 7, 1998, the appellant entered into a fee

agreement with her counsel, Robert A. Laughlin. That fee agreement includes the following: 

Robert A. Laughlin shall have the right to claim attorney fees or [sic]

expenses, based upon the appeal which is the subject of this Contract, to the full

extent that such rights are conferred upon the Client by the [Equal Access to Justice

Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA)].

Fee Agreement at 1. This provision is unreasonable and unenforceable because it transfers to the

attorney the client's EAJA rights. See Shaw v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1997) ("the law gives

the EAJA cause of action and standing to the client[,] . . . and the attorney cannot amend the law by

bestowing such standing on the attorney"); accord Fritz v. West, 13 Vet.App. 190, 192-93 (1999)

(holding that, where "there is a substantial question as to whether the instant EAJA application has

the appellant's authorization", appellant must provide "a verification that he approves the submission

of the instant EAJA application"); In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Mason, 11 Vet.App. 514,

516 (1998) (per curiam order) (Fee Agreement of Mason);see also Oguachuba v. INS, 706 F.2d 93,

97-98 (2d Cir. 1983) ("Whether an award of attorney fees under the [EAJA] ultimately redounds to

the benefit of counsel depends upon the private contractual arrangements between the attorney and

the client. . . . [But] counsel has no standing to apply to the public fisc for payment."). Accordingly,

the Court holds that that provision is unreasonable on its face, under 38 U.S.C. § 7263(d), because

it conflicts with section 2412(d), and the provision is thus unenforceable.

On consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the appellant file an

amended fee agreement that complies with this order and the rules articulated in Fritz, Fee

Agreement of Mason, and Shaw, all supra. It is further
2

ORDERED that this case be held in abeyance pending receipt of such a revised fee agreement

or until further order of the Court. 

DATED: June 30, 2000 PER CURIAM.
A92A0865.

#### HUNT v. THE STATE.

(422 SE2d 75)

Johnson, Judge.

A jury found John Hunt guilty of one count of selling cocaine to an undercover officer. He appeals his conviction.

1. Hunt, who represented himself at trial, testified that his purpose for being in a “known drug area” at the time of the incident was to gather material for a book he was writing about his life experiences. He argues in this appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to admit the manuscript of the book into evidence. The court excluded the manuscript on the grounds that its contents were irrelevant and immaterial to the offense charged. “Evidence must relate to the questions being tried by the jury and bear upon them either directly or indirectly. Irrelevant matter should be excluded.” OCGA § 24-2-1. The contents of the book itself do not bear on any of the elements of the crime charged and therefore the manuscript was properly excluded.

2. Hunt argues that it was error for the trial court to have ruled on his motion to suppress, motion to be released on his own recognizance and motion for reduction of bail without a hearing. Subsequent to the entry of an order on those motions, a hearing was held to consider several additional pre-trial motions filed by Hunt. Hunt did not renew the earlier motions or object to the court’s having previously ruled on them without an opportunity to be heard at the pre-trial *345hearing or at trial. As this issue was not timely raised below, we cannot consider them for the first time on appeal. *Weaver v. State,*200 Ga. App. 82 (1) (406 SE2d 574) (1991).

Decided September 8, 1992.

*Kirbo & McCalley, Jon V. Forehand,*for appellant.

*H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Charles M. Stines, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

3. Evidence was presented at trial that Hunt approached the vehicle of the undercover agent and asked him what he needed. The officer replied “a twenty,” meaning of $20 piece of crack cocaine. Hunt then got in the back of the pick-up truck and instructed the officer to drive down the street. Hunt then told the driver to stop, got out of the truck and approached three other men on the street. All of the men then came up to the vehicle and sold the officer a quantity of cocaine for $20. It is clear from the evidence that Hunt aided, abetted, and in fact facilitated the commission of the crime with which he was convicted. Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, we find that a rational trier of fact could have found Hunt guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of all of the charges. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carley, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.*
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                          |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| By:                  /s/                Jose Araque |   |   |        |
| Jose                Araque, Chief Executive Officer           |   |   |        |

----
##### 



Exhibit 23.3 HEAD OFFICE:
    A-6, Maharani Bagh

New Delhi-110065

PH.:011-41626470-71, 41328425

FAX: 011-26843073

e-mail info@bansalco.com
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Caneum, Inc. on Form S-8 (SEC File No.
333-135124) of our report dated April 6, 2007, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Caneum, Inc., of the
Balance Sheet of Continuum Systems Private Limited, Gurgaon (India as of December 31, 2006. M/s Bansal & Co.

Chartered Accountants /s/ D. S. Rawat
D. S. Rawat

Partner

Mship No.-83030

Place: New Delhi

Date: June 29, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        1,016,399
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,540,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                    100,113
<INVENTORY>                                   1,960,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              5,049,039
<PP&E>                                        1,104,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                  478,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                5,675,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,673,892
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          9,160
<OTHER-SE>                                    3,977,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  5,675,425
<SALES>                                       5,934,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              5,952,181
<CGS>                                         3,388,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 5,105,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 846,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                    314,533
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             532,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    532,465
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .06


</TABLE>
China Packaging Technologies, Inc. - Exhibit 10.26 - Filed by
   newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.26 

Maximum Debt Guarantee Contract 

(English Summary) 

	Date of Signing 	March 12, 2009 
	  	  
	Contract No 	33905200900000966 
	  	  
	Parties to Contract 	           
             SD Group as Guarantor and Xiaoshan Agricultural
      Bank of China as Lender 
	  	  
	Guarantee 	           
             Great Shengda 
	  	  
	Guaranteed Maximum 	           
             RMB 75,000,000 million 
	Amount 	  
	Guaranteed Indebtedness 	                   1
      any indebtedness incurred by GREAT SHENGDA to Lender during the term of
      March 12, 2009 and March 12, 2010 
	  	           
             2 the Banker’s Acceptance of Commercial Bills
      Contract (商业汇票银行承兑合同,No 33201200800045814) between GREAT
      SHENGDA and Lender for principal of RMB 7 million 


 

	Guaranteed Scope 	
                         The
      principal, interests, penalty interests, compound interest; liquidated
      damage, damage, litigation cost and attorney fee arising from the
      realization of the debt of the relevant indebtedness. 

	  	
       

	Term 	
                     
         Two years after the expiration of the term of the relevant
      indebtedness 

	  	
       

	Undertakings 	
                     
         We list below some material undertakings: 

		
                         Guarantor
      must give 15 day prior written notice to Lender and obtain Lender’s prior
      written consent when: 

	  	
                         -
      Guarantor alters its capital structure or business mode, or 

		
                         -
      Guarantor provides guarantee to any third party or create encumbrance over
      its assets or equity for itself or any third party in a manner that may
      affect its performance under this contract. 

	  	
       

	Dispute Resolution 	
                     
         PRC court where Lender locates
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ted Kozub, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Direct Response
Financial Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

April 30, 2004

/s/ Ted Kozub
---------------------------------
Name: Ted Kozub
Title: Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
# SAVE Logo Use and Guidelines

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has adopted and is using in commerce the SAVE trademark (Mark). DHS has registered the Mark with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Use of the Mark, without permission, is unauthorized and in violation of trademark law.

If you would like to be authorized to use the SAVE Logo and Mark, download and review the Guidelines and Licensing Agreement   (PDF) . You must meet certain criteria as prescribed in the Guidelines for using the SAVE Mark. When you have filled out the agreement, return it to uscis.verlogo@uscis.dhs.gov. Upon receipt and approval of the Licensing Agreement, DHS will furnish the digitized logo files for use on websites and approved printed materials.

For more information on SAVE Mark usage, please email uscis.verlogo@uscis.dhs.gov.

## Useful Links

                - SAVE Trademark License Application*(PDF)*

10/20/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF THE  VOYAGER  GROUP,  INC. AS OF JULY 31, 2000 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159
<PP&E>                                         143
<DEPRECIATION>                                 44
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          627
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10
<OTHER-SE>                                     (409)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265
<SALES>                                        670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               670
<CGS>                                          209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.26)




</TABLE>
Opinion filed September 4 , 201 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _

_____



### No. 11

- 1 4

- 00 018

- C V

_____ _

_____



### C&G SPORTING GOODS, LLC

, Appellant

V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND JAMES BROWN

, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV31895

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A ppellant

, C&G Sporting Goods, LLC

, ha s filed in this court a n unopposed

motion for voluntary dismis s al

. Appellant states in the motion that it “ seeks

voluntary dismissal of the appeal in this action because all parties have fully

compromised and settled all issues in dispute. This appeal is therefore moot. ”

Appellant requests that this court dismiss the ap peal w ith prejudice

. Appellant also2 advises this court that Appellant contacted counsel for the Texas Workforce

Commission and counsel for James Brown and that neither oppose s the motion to

dismiss. Therefore, in accordance with Appellant ’ s request, we dismiss th is

appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion is granted, and th e appeal is dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

September 4 , 201 4

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J., and Bailey , J.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CAO CERTIFICATION
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Verticalnet, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 By:
    
    /s/ JONATHAN T. COHENJonathan T. CohenVice President and Chief Accounting Officer
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                                                                                                                           |   |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  July 13, 2011 | /s/ David K. Young                                                                                                                             |   |
|                           | David K. Young                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                           | President, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----

----