alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Evaristo SALINAS-MELENDEZ, also known as Evaristo Salinas, also known as Evaristo Salinas, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-51056

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

M. Carolyn Fuentes, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*434Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Evaristo Salinas-Melendez presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. Gomez-Herrera,*523 F.3d 554, 562-63 (5th Cir.2008), which held that the disparity in sentences that occurs because some defendants can participate in a fast-track program while others cannot is not “unwarranted” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               502,161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  419,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,437
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (76,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (76,041)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report
of Compugen Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I the undersigned, being the President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

\s\ Martin Gerstel
Title:   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date:    March 16, 2009



---

---
# Direct Filing Address for Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence

**Before you file your Form I-751**
                      - Calculate your fees.  To determine the correct fee, use our  Fee Calculator .
                      - Check the form edition date.  You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions. You can also check the date listed in the “Edition Date" section on the  Form I-751  page to ensure that you are submitting the correct version of the form.
                      - Review the form instructions for required documents.  If you are filing with your U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse (called “filing jointly”), you must file your Form I-751 during the 90-day period immediately before your conditional residence expires. We will reject your Form I-751 if you file more than 90 days before the date your conditional residence expires. Use our   Filing Calculator for Form I-751 (Filing Jointly with Your Spouse)  to determine your 90-day filing date.
                      - Make sure you complete all sections of the form.  Provide a response to all required fields.
                      - Sign your form!  Read the signature sections carefully to determine where to sign. If you are filing your Form I-751 jointly with your U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse or stepparent, both you and your spouse or stepparent must correctly sign the form.

We will reject forms submitted with incorrect or incomplete fees, the wrong edition date, missing fields, or if you forget to sign or sign in the wrong place. To help ensure that we accept your petition, visit our Form Filing Tips page to learn how to complete your form accurately, assemble your petition and mail your form.

## Where to file

03/30/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of China Precision Steel, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wo Hing
Li, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Wo Hing LiWo
      Hing LiPresident
      & Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)


May 8,
2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  May 19, 2009                     /s/ Zhigang Wang ------------------------------- Zhigang Wang, CEO & CFO
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Broadwind Energy, Inc. (the "Company") for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew J. Gadow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 16,
2009

/s/ MATTHEW J. GADOW Matthew J. Gadow Chief Financial Officer


This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

110

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications  The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp. and will be retained by Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  March 16, 2009 /s/ Yun Wang Yun Wang (Chief Executive Officer)  March 16, 2009 /s/ Jianhua Sun Jianhua Sun (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 13.2



Certification pursuant to Section 906 Sarbanes Oxley Act by the Chief

Executive Officer of Telecom Italia Media S.p.A.



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the Report) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Paolo Serra, the Chief Executive Officer of Telecom Italia Media S.p.A.,
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom Italia Media S.p.A..
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 30, 2006



By:

/s/ Paolo SerraName:

Paolo SerraTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
NO. 07-06 -035 2-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B JU LY17, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ RO BERTO R OD RI GU EZ, Appel lan t

v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 25 1 DIS T RI CT COU RT OF RA NDA L L COU NT Y; ST NO. 15, 828 -C; HON. RICHARD D AMBOL D, PRESIDING

_________

_________

_________

____ ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

______ _________

_________

_______ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Pendi ng before us is the moti on for rehear ing of

Rober to Rodr ig uez . In that mot ion , he cont end s we fai l ed t o ad dres s w he th er h e ha d a c on s ti tu ti on al r i g htt o ha v e a j ury det ermin e w het her the elem ent s of a foreign pen al statu te an d a T exas Pena l statut e w ere subst ant ially

similar. W e overrule the m otion for several reaso ns. Fi rs t, the c ontent ion was not p re ser v ed. W hen asked at tr ial w hether he h ad any obj ect ion s to th e j ur

y ch arg e, ap pel lan t s tated “ no.” R espon din g “ no” resul ted i n a waiver2

of the cur re nt compl ain t. See White v. State , No. 2- 02- 143- CR , 2003 Tex . Ap p. L E X IS 2033 (Tex . Ap p.–F ort W orth, Ma rc h 6, 2003, pet. re f’d) (n ot de si g nated for publ ic ati on) ( hol din g that a s imi lar

co mplai nt was w aiv ed w hen the appell ant stat ed that he had no obj ect ion s to th e jury

charge). Next, and ev en i f the i ss ue was preser v ed, we not e tha t app ell ant’ s c onst it uti onal arg ument isbas ed on Appr endi v. New Jer

sey , 530 U .S. 466, 490, 120 S. Ct . 234 8, 23 62- 63, 1 47 L. Ed.2d 435, 455 ( 2000)
. In A pp r e ndi , t he Sup re me C our t hel d tha t t he U nit ed S t a t e s Co n s t it u t io n re qu ire d a n y fac t th a t inc re ases the penal ty for a cr ime beyond t he sta tutor il y

presc ri bed max imum t o be submi tted to a j ur y . Here, ho w ev er , we c onst ru ed two s tatut es, and, as st ated in our ori g ina l opi nio n, the i nter pretati on of st atute s i nv olves a q uest ion of law
. Har

dy v. State, 187 S. W .3d 2 32, 2 36 ( Tex . Ap p.–Tex ar kana 2006, pet. re f’d)
. Thus, Appr

endi was and i s i nappl ic abl e. See E x p ar te White , 2 1 1 S
. W
. 3 d 3 1 6 (T e x. Cr im
. A p p . 2 0 0 7 ) ( wh e re in t h e T e xa s C o u rto f Cr im in a l A p p e a ls , a s o p p o s e d t o a ju ry, ass ess ed w hether

the two s tatut es w ere s ubst anti all y si mil ar ). Acc ordin g ly , app ell ant’ s mot ion for rehear ing i s o v er ru led
. Br ian Qui nn Chief Justice
Do not p ubl is h.
- Home
- Office Locations

# United States Capitol Police

119 D Street, NE

Washington, DC20510

United States

:

USCapitolPolice@uscp.gov
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors of


China Natural Gas, Inc.





We consent to the use of our report dated March 10, 2010, except for the effects on the consolidated financial statements of the restatement described in Note 2 and 15, as to which the date is September 30, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of China Natural Gas, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of China Natural Gas, Inc.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3/A (No. 333-160150), and Form S-8 (No. 333-166422) of the report described in the previous sentence appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K of China Natural Gas, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Frazer Frost, LLP





Brea, California


June 14, 2011





135 South State College Boulevard, Suite 300 | Brea, California 92821 | 714.990.1040 | frazerfrost.com


Los Angeles and Visalia, CA


F R AZER FROST, LLP is an independent firm associated with Moore Stephens International Limited.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, W. Randall Pittman, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emageon Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 31, 2005 /s/ W. Randall PittmanW. Randall PittmanChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10220]



[[Page 20794]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Prepare a Supplement to the 1997 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Yuma Training Range Complex

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act as 
implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR 
parts 1500-1508), the Department of the Navy intends to prepare a 
Supplement to the 1997 Environmental Impact Statement for the Yuma 
Training Range Complex to evaluate the cumulative impacts on the 
Sonoran Pronghorn, an endangered species, of Marine Corps actions when 
added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future 
actions.

ADDRESSES: Questions regarding preparation of the SEIS may be directed 
to: Commander, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering 
Command, 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92132-5190 (Attn: Ms. Deb 
Therouix).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deb Therouix, telephone (619) 532-
3348, fax (619) 522-2648, E-Mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e89c808d9a879d81908c8da88d8e8c9b9fc686899e8e898bc686899e91c6858184"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="63170b06110c160a1b07062306050710144d0d02150502004d0d02151a4d0e0a0f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Marine Corps completed an environmental 
impact statement (EIS) in 1997 addressing its military aviation and 
associated training impacts on the Yuma Training Range Complex. This 
complex includes the Barry M. Goldwater Range, AZ, which contains 
habitat for the Sonoran Pronghorn.
    On February 12, 2001, the United States District Court for the 
District of Columbia found that the cumulative impact analysis in the 
1997 Yuma Training Range Complex EIS was deficient in that if failed to 
provide sufficient analysis of cumulative impacts on the Sonoran 
Pronghorn in accordance with 40 CFR 1508.7. The Court remanded the 
matter to the Marine Corps for further consideration of such impacts.
    Accordingly, the Department of the Navy is preparing a Supplement 
to the EIS, in accordance with 40 CFR 1502.9(c), that will evaluate the 
cumulative impacts on the Sonoran pronghorn of Marine Corps actions 
when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future 
actions regardless of what agency or person undertakes such other 
actions.

    Dated: April 18, 2001.
Duncan Holaday,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Installations and Facilities).
[FR Doc. 01-10220 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 21, 2018

p1217

Order 

Clerk

December 21, 2018

157238 & (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157238 

COA: 340887

Kent CC: 99-011190-FC

MICHAEL GRESHAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2017 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. The defendant’s claims regarding DNA testing 

and the retention of biological materials under MCL 770.16, and regarding judicial bias, 

are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because the 

remaining questions raised in the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment are 

prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion to remand to expand the record is DENIED.