alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

 I, David Calkins, CEO and President, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacel Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   Board  of  Directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a. all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

August 29, 2003

BY: /s/David Calkins
   ----------------------
David Calkins, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
T.C. Memo. 2006-266

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

CURR-SPEC PARTNERS, LP, CURR-SPEC MANAGERS, LLC, 

TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Docket No. 1350-05. Filed December 14, 2006. 

This opinion was withdrawn by order dated 

January 3, 2007.
# FILED
May 30, 2000 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE IN RE: APPL

ICATION OF A

PPALACHIA

N SCHOOL OF L

AW, P ETITIONER
No. M2000-00053-SC-BLE-CV

ORDER Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7, Article 14.01 the Petitioner, Appalachian Schoolof Law (hereinafter

“ASL”) appeals the denial of the Tennessee Board of Law Examiners to allow graduates of the ASL to sit for the Tennessee bar exam. Petitioner is in its third year of operation. Petitioner ave rs that “At its August 5, 1999 meeting, the ABA Council on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar found ASL to be in the requisite ‘substantial complian ce’ with the fifty-one (51) ABA Standards for Approval of Law Schools, including the Pr

ogram of Legal Education (Standards 301 to 307), with two exceptions: low admissions stan dards and inadequate institutional finances. Based on those two exceptions, the AB A Council denied ASL’s accreditation application. Since ASL will fully rectify the two exceptions by no later than August, 2000, ASL is in the pr ocess of timely filing a second ap plication for ABA accreditation which appears will be granted.” Based upon the denial of accreditation by the ABA, the Tennessee Board of Law Examiners denied ASL’s req

uest based upon Ar

ticle II. Section 2 .02 states: App roval of Law Schools. Each applicant to take the examination must ha v e completed a course of i nstruct ion in and graduated from a regularly organized law school which is accredited by the American Bar Association, or one which as been approved by the Board pursuant to Section 2.03. Section 2.3 allows approval by the Board of only law schools located in Tennessee. ASL is located in Virginia and no t in Tennessee and therefore is not eligible for approval by the Board. No provision in our

rules authorizes approval or investigation by the Board of Law Examiners of law schools which are not located in this state. Petit ioner requests this Court to reverse the determination of the Tennessee Board of La w Examiners denying its graduates to sit for the Tennessee bar exam. This Court has considered the petition of ASL and has concluded that it should be denied.
PER CURIAM
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
April 19, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 128878(176)(180) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 46 TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, Justices Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128878 COA: 254179 Crawford CC: 02-005951-CZ COUNTY OF CRAWFO RD and CRAWFORD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Defendants, Counter-Plaintiffs, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

COUNTY OF KALKASKA, Intervening Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and

COUNTY OF OTSEGO, Third-Party Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion to file reply brief exceeding the page limit is DENIED. Kalkaska and Crawford Counties ma y file a reply brief conforming to the 10

- page limit by April 26, 2006. The motion to strike is DE NIED as moot, but appellants are cautioned against submitting do cuments that are not part of the record be low in future submissions made in conn ection with this appeal.

W EAVER , J., would grant the moti on to file reply brief exceeding the page limit and the motion to strike.

K ELLY , J., would grant the motion to file reply brief exceeding the page limit.

d0419 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
April 19, 2006
Clerk
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jingan Wang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the small business issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (this "report");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 23, 2005


By: /s/ Jingan Wang
    -------------------------------
Jingan Wang
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofUSIP.Com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Kathy Christopher, Controller of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Kathy Christopher      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Kathy Christopher          |
| Controller, USIP.Com, Inc. |

 

March 24,2004

 

USIP.Com,Inc. does not have a “Chief Financial Officer,” Kathy Christopher is theprincipal financial and accounting officer.

 

----
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 20

- 00251

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 153rd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 153

- 314914

- 20

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Gabriel, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### R ICHARD 

### M EYRAT



### , M.D.

, Appellant

V



### .

E LIZABETH 

### M OUTON



### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

### S URVIVING 

### S POUSE AND

AS 

### A NTICIPATED 

### P ERSONAL 

### R EPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

### E STATE OF 

### J OSEPH 

### M OUTON 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have co nsidered “Appellant ’ s Motion to Dismiss.” We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : September 24, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of DCI USA, Inc. (the "Company")
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 26, 2006                                  /s/ Michael Gibbs
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Michael Gibbs
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 5-8-2007 

# U SA v . S t eve ns P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 05-2497

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . S t eve n s " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1041. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/1041UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 05- 2497 UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. RO BE RT J . STEV EN S,

A ppel l ant O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e W e ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia D . C . C i vi l A ct i on N o. 04- cr - 00051 ( H onor abl e A l an N . B l och) Pr es ent : SC I R I C A , C hi ef J udge, SLO V I TER , M c K EE, RE N D ELL , BA RR Y , A M BR O , FU EN TES, SM I T H , FI SH E R , C H A G A R E S, J O R D A N , H A R D I M A N and C O W E N , C i r cui tJ udges O R D E R A m aj or i t yof the ac t i ve j udges havi ng vot ed forr ehea r i ng en banc i n t he above appea l , i ti s or der ed thatt he C l er k of thi s C our tl i s tt he above cas e forr ehea r i ng en banc a t th e c o n v e n ien c e o f

th e C o u rt. BY THE C OU RT, / s /A nt honyJ . Sci r i ca C hi ef J udge D at ed: M ay8, 2007 C M D / cc: K ar en S. G er l ach, E s q. R ober tL . E berhar dt , E s q. L aur a S. I r w i n, E s q.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10156]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-980, MM Docket No. 01-28, RM-10043]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Albuquerque, NM

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of The Board of Regents of the 
University of New Mexico and the Board of Education of the City of 
Albuquerque, New Mexico, licensee of noncommercial educational station 
KNME-TV, substitutes DTV channel *35 for DTV channel *25 at 
Albuquerque, New Mexico. See 66 FR 9061, February 6, 2001. DTV channel 
*35 can be allotted to Albuquerque in compliance with the principle 
community coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at reference 
coordinates (35-12-44 N. and 106-26-57 W.) with a power of 250, HAAT of 
1289 meters and with a DTV service population of 762 thousand. With 
this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective June 7, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-28, adopted April 18, 2001, and 
released April 23, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.


    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under New Mexico, is amended by removing DTV channel *25 and adding DTV 
channel *35 at Albuquerque.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-10156 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Unassociated Document


    
      
        第 1 页 共 2 页

      

      
        

      

    


    Equity
Transfer Agreement

    


    The
Agreement is jointly signed on April 2, 2010 in Shanghai by the Parties
hereunder:

    


    Transferor:
Goldenway Nanjing Garments Co., Ltd. (Party A)

    Address:
509 Chengxin Thoroughfare, Jiangning Development Zone, Nanjing

    Transferee:
Mr. Jiaxing Xing (Party B)

    Address:
Room 501, No.28, Lane 99, Wanding Road, Minhang District, Shanghai

    


    Shanghai
La Chapelle Garment and Accessories Company Limited (Subject Company) has 7.5
million of RMB Yuan as registered capital, 10% of the total registered capital
were invested by Party A. In the light of governing laws and regulations,
through friendly negotiations by the Parties, the following articles are agreed
upon:

    


    Article
I  The Equity Transferred and Transferring Price

    1. Party
A transfers 5% of Subject Company’s total equity to Party B at the price of 6.18
million of RMB Yuan.

    2. All
and any rights and interests affiliated to the transferred are transferred along
with it.

    3. The
Transferee is obliged to complete the payment for the transferred equity within
30 days after the signing of this Agreement.

    


    Article
II  Covenants and Warranties

    Party A
warrants that Party A legally owns the equity transferred to Party B as
stipulated in Article I, and Party A has a full and effective disposition of the
transferred. Party A warrants no mortgate or security right is attached to the
transferred, and no claim is and will be made by any third party on the
transferred.

    


    Article
III  Agreement Breach Liabilities

    Nil

    


    Article
IV  Dispute Resolution

    The
Agreement abides by the laws of People’s Republic of China and only explanations
by which are applicable.

    Any
dispute arisen with or related to the Agreement shall be resolved through
friendly negotiations. In the case of a failed negotiation, the issue shall be
submitted to Shanghai Arbitration Commission or sued at The People’s
Court.

    


    Article
V  Others

    1. The
Agreement is made in 4 duplicates, 1 is held by each Party, 1 by the Subject
Company, and 1 is used in the Business Administration formalities.

    2. The
Agreement takes effect upon being signed by each and all Parties.

    


    (blank
below)

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    
    

     

    
      
        
          第 2 页 共 2 页

        

        
          

        

      


       

    

    
      	Party A
      (Signature & Stamp)   	Party B
      (Signature & Stamp)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,151,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,851,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                   655,126
<INVENTORY>                                 20,120,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,778,039
<PP&E>                                      16,405,638
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,519,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,944,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,661,451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,498
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,584,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,944,354
<SALES>                                     35,864,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,864,568
<CGS>                                       18,491,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,671,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,214,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             735,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (247,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (60,617)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (187,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (187,230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
        

</TABLE>