alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6175 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that payments under 

the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance program shall be made 

in a lump sum, unless the insured or the beneficiary elects otherwise. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2010 

Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that payments under the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance program shall be made in a lump sum, unless 

the insured or the beneficiary elects otherwise. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Life Insurance 

5 Transparency Act’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6175 IH

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8705 of title 5, United 

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(f)(1) The employee may elect settlement of insur6 ance under this chapter either in a lump sum or by such 

7 alternative form of payment as the Office may (in addition 

8 to a lump-sum payment) provide for. 

9 ‘‘(2)(A) If the employee does not make such an elec10 tion, the beneficiary or beneficiaries may elect settlement 

11 by any form of payment that was available to the employee 

12 under paragraph (1). 

13 ‘‘(B) If the employee does make such an election, the 

14 beneficiary or beneficiaries may elect settlement by any 

15 other form of payment that was available to the employee 

16 under paragraph (1). 

17 ‘‘(3) An election under paragraph (1) or (2) shall not 

18 be effective unless it is submitted to the Office, in writing, 

19 in such form and manner as the Office prescribes. 

20 ‘‘(4) If no election is made under this subsection, the 

21 settlement shall be made in the form of a lump-sum pay22 ment.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 subsection (a) shall apply in the case of any employee who 

25 first becomes insured under chapter 87 of title 5, United 

26 States Code, in any calendar year beginning at least 3 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6175 IH

1 months after the date of the enactment of this Act. For 

2 purposes of the preceding sentence, the term ‘‘employee’’ 

3 has the meaning given such term under section 8701 of 

4 such title. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 8****List of Subsidiaries of Metal Storm Limited**       **Percentage** **Jurisdiction of****Name of Subsidiary** **Owned** **Formation**Metal Storm Inc. 100% (a) DelawareMetal Storm U.S.A. Limited 100% (b) DelawareProCam Machine LLC 100% (c) Washington (a) Metal Storm Limited directly owns 49% of Metal Storm Inc. and officers of Metal Storm Limitedwho are U.S. citizens own the remaining 51% of the company through a trust. (b) Metal Storm Limited directly owns 100% of Metal Storm U.S.A. Limited. Metal Storm U.S.A.Limited was incorporated in Delaware on March 31, 2004. (c) Metal Storm Limited directly owns 100% of ProCam Machine LLC. Metal Storm Limited sold certainassets, liabilities and books of business of ProCam to Monroe Machine Products, Inc. on June 1,2005.
<PAGE>

		[LETTERHEAD OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP]


Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors of
Union Planters Corporation and
Union Planters Bank, National Association

We have examined managements assertion about Union Planters Bank,
National Associations (the Company) compliance with the minimum
servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of Americas Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 included in
the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is
responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion about the Companys compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
the Companys compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
performing such other procedures, as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Companys compliance with the minimum servicing
standards. In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2000 is fairly stated, in all
material respects.

/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLP
--------------------------------
PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Memphis, TN 38103
March 21, 2001
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Priviam, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Urrea,
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for
the periods presented in the Report.




Date:
      May 12, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Daniel UrreaName:
              Daniel
      UrreaTitle:
              Chief
      Financial
Officer
(86 South. 52)

#### WEAKLEY et al. v. HENRY, County Treasurer.

(6 Div. 107.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 30, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Dan A. Greene, Judge.

Petition by John B. Weakley and others for writ of mandamus against M. V. Henry, County Treasurer, etc. From an order denying a motion for the writ, petitioners appeal.

Affirmed.

Johnston & Cocke, of Birmingham, for appellants.

John McCoy and J. G. Davis, both of Birmingham, for appellee.

THOMAS,. J.

Petition by the appellants for writ of mandamus against the appellee, county treasurer.

This appeal was by agreement submitted and consolidated with the appeal identically styled and numbered in this court, sixth division, No. 108, 86 South. 46.1 The order or decree of the lower court herein is affirmed, on the authority of the decision in the latter cause announced of this date.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.

1

 Ante, p. 463.
Exhibit 10.8


 


FORM OF PATENT RIGHT ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT


[Unofficial English Translation]


 


ASSIGNOR: Tuanfang Liu 362429197211134333


Address: 2 Xia’an, Zhongzhou Village, Zhouhu Town,
Anfu County, Ji’an City, Jiangxi Province


 


ASSIGNEE: Shenzhen Yi Jia Technology Co., Ltd.


Address: 1-4/F, Building B3, 14 Jian’an Road, Shajing
Sub-district, Bao’an District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province


 


Both parties hereby enter into the following agreement after reaching
a consensus pertaining to the assignment of the utility patent “_________” (name of the patent) through friendly discussions:


 


		1.	The Assignor agrees to assign the ownership of the following utility patent to the Assignee at no cost:



Name of patent: ___________________


Application number: ________________


Patent application date: _____________


Assignment fee: Gratuitous assignment


 


		2.	After this Agreement is signed and enters into force, the Assignor shall cease the use of the patent with immediate effect, and the
ownership of the patent shall belong only to the Assignee. The Assignee shall be responsible for all legal issues pertaining to the patent.



 


		3.	All disputes between both parties that arise in the performance of this Agreement shall be resolved through friendly consultation.
If both parties are unable to resolve the dispute, they may file a lawsuit in the People’s Court in Shenzhen.



 


		4.	This Agreement is prepared in triplicate. Both parties shall hold one copy each; one copy shall be used for the patent assignment
application. This Agreement shall enter into force after it is signed and sealed by both parties.



 


	ASSIGNOR (Seal, Signature):	ASSIGNEE (Seal, Signature):
	/s/ Tuanfang Liu		Shenzhen Yi Jia Technology Co., Ltd.
	 	(Seal Affixed)




 


	Date of signing: __________ (Date)	Date of signing: __________ (Date)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 13-16

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled by

the Chief Judge when furtherservice is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William P. Greene, Jr.,

having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The

Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Greene would provide substantial

service necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017, recall-eligible

retired Judge Greene is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1).

Judge Greene shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in

active service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief

Judge. It is further

ORDERED that Judge Greene shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2017 to review

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other substantial service

at the request of the Chief Judge and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up to 90 days

or its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Greene's service may be extended beyond 90 days. 

DATED: December 21, 2016 BY THE COURT:

ROBERT N. DAVIS

Chief Judge
Exhibit 99.2




                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael J. Piechoski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/Michael J. Piechoski
------------------------
Michael J. Piechoski
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
ERIC SCOTT MYERS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2290

_________ _________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Michael Flowers , Judge

.

Eric Scott Myers, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney

General, Tall ahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, THOMAS

, and ROWE

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
AND CCC SURETY OPERATIONS EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
AND SCHEDULES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           405,716
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       6,117
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 465,214
<CASH>                                           9,985
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              79,119
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          80,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 822,046
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                158,477
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            192,074
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           441
<OTHER-SE>                                     318,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   822,046
<PREMIUMS>                                     137,558
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             12,513
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 420
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      23,672
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     55,967
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            25,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,881
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,881
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5908 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of Point Peter in St. Marys, Georgia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2010 

Mr. KINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of Point Peter in St. Marys, Georgia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Point Peter Study 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior (herein8 after referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall conduct a spe9 cial resource study of Point Peter in St. Marys, Georgia, 

10 the site of an American fort near Cumberland Island that 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5908 IH

1 was attacked by British forces in January 1815 in one 

2 of the last battles of the War of 1812. 

3 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub4 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

5 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

6 site; 

7 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

8 designating the area as a unit of the National Park 

9 System; 

10 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

11 protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, 

12 State, or local governmental entities, or private and 

13 nonprofit organizations; 

14 (4) consult with interested Federal, State, and 

15 local governmental entities and private and nonprofit 

16 organizations, and any other interested individuals, 

17 including owners of private property located in the 

18 study area; and 

19 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac20 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

21 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

22 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

23 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec24 tion 8 of the National Park Service General Authorities 

25 Act (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5908 IH

1 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

2 on which funds are first made available for the study 

3 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

4 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep5 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

6 Resources of the Senate a report containing the results 

7 of the study and any conclusions and recommendations of 

8 the Secretary. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6092 

To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act to allow recreational 

fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass in the Block Island Sound transit zone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 10, 2010 

Mr. BISHOP of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act to 

allow recreational fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass in 

the Block Island Sound transit zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECREATIONAL FISHING FOR ATLANTIC 

4 STRIPED BASS IN THE BLOCK ISLAND SOUND 

5 TRANSIT ZONE. 

6 Section 9 of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation 

7 Act (16 U.S.C. 5158) is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(d) RECREATIONAL FISHING IN BLOCK ISLAND

10 SOUND TRANSIT ZONE.— 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6092 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para2 graph (2), the Secretary shall not prohibit fishing 

3 for Atlantic Striped Bass in the Block Island Sound 

4 transit zone. 

5 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—This subsection does not 

6 limit the authority of the Secretary to establish sea7 sonal or other temporary limitations on fishing that 

8 are specifically necessary for the conservation and 

9 management of Atlantic striped bass. 

10 ‘‘(3) BLOCK ISLAND SOUND TRANSIT ZONE DE11 FINED.—In this subsection the term ‘Block Island 

12 Sound transit zone’ means the area of the exclusive 

13 economic zone within Block Island Sound, north of 

14 a line connecting Montauk Light, Montauk Point, 

15 New York, and Block Island Southeast Light, Block 

16 Island, Rhode Island; and west of a line connecting 

17 Point Judith Light, Point Judith, Rhode Island, and 

18 Block Island Southeast Light, Block Island, Rhode 

19 Island.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2643 

AN ACT 

To direct the Attorney General to provide State officials 

with access to criminal history information with respect 

to certain financial service providers required to undergo 

State criminal background checks, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2643 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Licensing Effi3 ciency Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BACKGROUND CHECKS. 

5 Section 1511(a) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing 

6 Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5110(a)) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting after ‘‘State-licensed loan origi8 nators’’ the following: ‘‘and other financial service 

9 providers’’; and 

10 (2) by inserting before the period the following: 

11 ‘‘or other financial service providers’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2643 

AN ACT 

To direct the Attorney General to provide State ofchecks, and for other purposes. required to undergo State criminal background with respect to certain financial service providers ficials with access to criminal history information
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bernard Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered October 16, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress inculpatory statements.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the police acted on inherently unreliable or suspect information in effectuating his arrest, and that, therefore, his statements should have been suppressed as the fruit of an arrest premised on less than probable cause. We find this contention to be without merit. The police obtained the information on which they relied in a face-to-face interview *(see, People v Crosby,*91 AD2d 20, 28) with an identified individual who resided in the apartment where the killing occurred and who related what he observed during its commission *(cf., People v Hicks,*38 NY2d 90; *People v Moore,*32 NY2d 67, *cert denied*414 US 1011). The information so obtained was at least circumstantially reliable *(see, People v Marin,*91 AD2d 616, 617) and here provided a sufficient predicate for the defendant’s arrest.

Evidence of the defendant’s prior threat, his inculpatory statements, and the evidence that the victim died of asphyxia by strangulation and a stab wound inflicted with great force established that the defendant intended to cause death. We are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

*790Finally, we do not find the sentence to be either harsh or excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.