alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                                                                                |                                                |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                           |                                           |
|         |                                                                                                                                                           | /s/Lawrence              Lok              Yuen-Ming |
|         | Lawrence                Lok Yuen-MingChief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial Officer)Date:                 December 20, 2005 |

----
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jing’an Wang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 15, 2010





/s/ Jing’an WangJing’an
      Wang, Principal Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of China Precision Steel, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leada
Tak Tai Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Leada Tak Tai LiLeada
      Tak Tai LiChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)


May 8,
2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
**Exhibit 99.6**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONI, Lawrence Davis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Hydrogenics Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annualreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: March 14, 2006      /s/ Lawrence Davis         Lawrence Davis
H. R. 5706 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the building occupied by the Government Printing Office located at 

31451 East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, as the ‘‘Frank Evans Government 

Printing Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The building occupied by the Government Printing Office 

located at 31451 East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank Evans Government Printing 

Office Building’’ during the period in which the building is occupied 

by the Government Printing Office. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

With respect to the period in which the building referred to 

in section 1 is occupied by the Government Printing Office, any 

reference in a law, map, regulation, document, record, or other 

paper of the United States to that building shall be deemed to 

be a reference to the ‘‘Frank Evans Government Printing Office 

Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                       6-MOS             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUL-25-1998            JUL-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-26-1997            JUL-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-25-1998            JAN-25-1998
<CASH>                                          36,393                36,393 
<SECURITIES>                                    11,907                11,907
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,907                11,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                     0 
<INVENTORY>                                     17,892                17,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,746                79,746
<PP&E>                                         528,308               528,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (54,761)              (54,761)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 789,790               789,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,157               113,157
<BONDS>                                        127,867               127,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,359                37,359
<PREFERRED>                                          0                     0
<COMMON>                                           302                   302
<OTHER-SE>                                     256,387               256,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   789,790               789,790
<SALES>                                          7,890                 8,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,315               129,936
<CGS>                                            5,223                 6,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,865               116,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,009                16,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,585                14,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,633               (23,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,538                (9,176)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,095               (13,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,081                 5,081
<CHANGES>                                            0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,274               (22,152)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05                 (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04                 (1.04)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmine Russo, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered June 14, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial because of extensive testimony at the trial concerning his pretrial identification. However, the Trial Judge properly permitted police testimony concerning the lineup for the purpose of rebutting the defendant’s suggestion that the eyewitness Kubiak was not credible and that the lineup was not properly conducted *(see, People v Melendez,*55 NY2d 445; *People v Trowbridge,*305 NY 471). Moreover, since the evidence of the defendant’s presence in the getaway car and his identification by Kubiak were so compelling, there is no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted him but for the claimed improper evidence, and any error as a result of the admission of the testimony concerning the lineup was harmless *(see, People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242).

Finally, viewing the court’s charge as a whole, the jury was properly instructed about the rules to be applied in arriving at its verdict, and none of the claimed errors warrant reversal of the defendant’s conviction *(see, People v Canty,*60 NY2d 830, 832; *People v Jackson,*45 AD2d 828, *affd*39 NY2d 64). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2643 

To direct the Attorney General to provide State officials with access to 

criminal history information with respect to certain financial service 

providers required to undergo State criminal background checks, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2015 

Mr. WILLIAMS (for himself, Mr. FINCHER, Ms. MOORE, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. 

NEUGEBAUER, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. LUCAS, 

and Mr. MEEKS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 

the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General to provide State officials 

with access to criminal history information with respect 

to certain financial service providers required to undergo 

State criminal background checks, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Licensing Effi5 ciency Act of 2015’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2643 IH

1 SEC. 2. BACKGROUND CHECKS. 

2 Section 1511(a) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing 

3 Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5110(a)) is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting after ‘‘State-licensed loan origi5 nators’’ the following: ‘‘and other financial service 

6 providers’’; and 

7 (2) by inserting before the period the following: 

8 ‘‘or other financial service providers’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1352-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1352-DR), dated December 18, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 22, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective December 22, 2000.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

 

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-1029 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5922 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5922

                   To expand small-scale hydropower.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2010

 Mr. Smith of Nebraska (for himself and Mr. McClintock) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
   Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and 
 Infrastructure and Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   To expand small-scale hydropower.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Small-Scale Hydropower 
Enhancement Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Conduit.--The term ``conduit'' means any tunnel, canal, 
        pipeline, aqueduct, flume, ditch, or similar manmade water 
        conveyance that is operated for the distribution of water for 
        agricultural, municipal, or industrial consumption and not 
        primarily for the generation of electricity.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY OF LAW.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any proposed 
hydroelectric project that seeks to use a conduit that is in existence 
on the date of the enactment of this Act to generate power that does 
not exceed 1.5 megawatts shall be exempt from section 30 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 823a).

SEC. 4. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN STRUCTURES IN REPORT AND STUDY.

    The Secretary shall--
            (1) include structures that have less than 10 feet of head 
        or would result in less than 1 megawatt of capacity as part of 
        the study and report required under section 1834 of the Energy 
        Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-58);
            (2) to the maximum extent practicable, consult with non-
        Federal and noncontracting interests in implementing this 
        section; and
            (3) implement this section on a nonreimbursable basis.
                                 <all>
```
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00002

- CV

ROBERT YORK PETTIT, JEFFREY YORK PETTIT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE

OF THE BIG HORN PHALANX TRUST, JOSEPH AUSTIN PETTIT AND EMILY ANNE PETTIT COVEY, Appellant s V. MARILYN EILEEN PETTIT TABOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Delta County, Texas Trial Court No. 10985

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER
Robert York Pettit, Jeffrey York Pettit, individually and as trustee of the Big Horn Phalanx Trust, Joseph Austin Pettit, and Emily Anne Pettit Covey (collectively Pettit) filed a motion requesting that this Court review the supersedeas bond in connection with th eir appeal of the trial court’s judgment. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 24.4. Pettit claimed that the trial court’s order set an excessive bond amount of $100,000.00 to supersede the underlying judgment. After reviewing the motion, appellee’s response, the attach ed exhibits, and the hearing record from the trial court, we conclude that we have an insufficient basis upon which to review the trial court’s decision. The judgment covered by the bond consists of a money judgment, costs, and the recovery by the appell ee of a fifty percent interest in two tracts of land. The trial court’s bond with respect to the recovery of an interest in real property is governed by Rule 24.2(a)(2)(A). See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 24.2(a)(2)(A). 1 Although evidence at the bond hearing establ ished the value of the property interest’s rent or revenue, the bond required to secure that portion of the judgment exceeds the amount of the rent or revenue by approximately seven times. Nothing in the record before us demonstrates the facts that led th e trial court to conclude that $100,000.00 was an appropriate amount for the supersedeas bond. We, therefore, abate this appeal and remand this case to the trial court for the entry of findings of fact to support the necessity of the bond amount attribut ed to appellee’s recovery of an

1 “ When the judgment is for the recovery of an interest in real . . . property, the trial court will determine the type of security that the judgment debtor must post. The amount of that security must be at least . . . the value of the property interest ’ s rent or revenue . . . . ” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 24.2(a)(2)(A).3 interest in real property. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 24.2(d). The court’s findings should be filed in this Court in a supplemental clerk’s record within twenty days of the date of this order. In light of this order of abatemen t and remand, this Court hereby stays execution and enforcement of the judgment pending further orders of this Court. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 24.4(c). During the pendency of this abatement, Pettit shall not act or fail to act in any way that might jeopardize or impair the property awarded to the appellee in the trial court’s judgment, including any act to change ownership or title to that property. All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: June 6, 2019
Opinion filed September 4, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-14-00018-CV

___________

C&G SPORTING GOODS, LLC, Appellant

V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND JAMES BROWN,

Appellees

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV31895

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, C&G Sporting Goods, LLC, has filed in this court an unopposed

motion for voluntary dismissal. Appellant states in the motion that it “seeks 

voluntary dismissal of the appeal in this action because all parties have fully 

compromised and settled all issues in dispute. This appeal is therefore moot.”

Appellant requests that this court dismiss the appeal with prejudice. Appellant also 
2

advises this court that Appellant contacted counsel for the Texas Workforce 

Commission and counsel for James Brown and that neither opposes the motion to 

dismiss. Therefore, in accordance with Appellant’s request, we dismiss this

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

September 4, 2014

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.