alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James M. Thomas, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Georgia-CarolinaBancshares, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004     /s/ James M. Thomas  James M. Thomas Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Stora Enso Oyj (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Esko Mäkeläinen, Senior Executive Vice President, Finance, Accounting and Legal Affairs, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 26, 2004



/s/    ESKO MÄKELÄINENEsko Mäkeläinen Senior Executive Vice President, Finance, Accounting and Legal Affairs, and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
certification required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5858 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5858

    To amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to 
 authorize a fire station construction grant program for 5 years, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2010

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on Science and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to 
 authorize a fire station construction grant program for 5 years, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firefighting Investment, Renewal, 
and Employment Act'' or the ``FIRE Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 33(e) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 
1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Construction of non-federal fire stations.--In 
        addition to the amounts authorized under paragraph (1), there 
        are authorized to be appropriated to the Director for 
        competitive grants for modifying, upgrading, or constructing 
        non-Federal fire stations $210,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
        2011 through 2015.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sandra Segal POLIN, individually, dba Law Offices of Sandra Segal Polin and Lauri Kritt Martin, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Andy BEHRMAN, an individual and Skywriting, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-55075.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 2011.*

Filed April 27, 2011.

Mitchell Neil Reims, Esquire, Silver & Freedman, APLC, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andy Behrman, Sherman OAKS, CA, pro se.

Michael Golland, Rosen Feig & Golland, LLP, Beverly Hills, CA, for DefendantAppellee.

*683Before: RYMER, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiffs-appellants Sandra Segal Polin and Lauri Kritt Martin appeal the district court’s denial of their request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendantsappellees Andy Behrman and Skywriting, LLC. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. *The Lands Council v. McNair,*537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); *see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council,*555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); *Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l*686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

NO. 99-775

JANE A. PATEK, APPELLANT,

V.

HERSHEL W. GOBER,

ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before HOLDAWAY, IVERS, and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

On October 18, 2000, the Court in a single-judge memorandum decision affirmed an April

5, 1999, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals that determined that new and material evidence

had not been submitted to reopen a claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.

On November 18, 2000, the appellant, through counsel, filed a motion for a decision by a panel.

On November 9, 2000, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-475,

114 Stat. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000) [hereinafter VCAA], was enacted. Section 5103(a) as amended by the

VCAA provides: 

Upon receipt of a complete or substantially complete application, the Secretary shall

notify the claimant and the claimant's representative, if any, of any information, and

any medical or lay evidence, not previously provided to the Secretary that is

necessary to substantiate the claim. As part ofthat notice, the Secretaryshall indicate

which portion of that information and evidence, if any, is to be provided by the

claimant and which portion, in any, the Secretary, in accordance with section 5103A

ofthis title and any other applicable provision of law, will attempt to obtain on behalf

of the claimant. 

In Karnas v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 308, 312-13 (1991), this Court held that unless Congress

provided otherwise, where a statute or regulation changes during the appellate process, the version

most favorable to the claimant shall apply. It is not the function of this Court to determine in the first

instance which version of the law is most favorable to the claimant. See Baker v. West, 11 Vet.App.

163 (1998); Dudnick v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 79 (1997). 

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant shall, within 30 days after the date of this order, file, and serve

on the Secretary, a supplemental memorandum of law explaining what impact, if any, she believes
that the enactment of the VCAA has on the disposition of her underlying appeal and the motion for

panel decision. Also, the appellant shall explain why the Board decision should not be vacated and

this matter remanded pursuant to the VCAA and Karnas, supra. The Secretary shall file, and serve

on the appellant, a reply to the appellant's supplemental memorandum 30 days after its date of

service. The appellant may, if she chooses, file a reply to the Secretary's response within 14 days

after the date of service of the Secretary's response.

DATED: January 10, 2001 PER CURIAM.
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Submitted May 1, 2019*

Decided May 2, 2019 

Before 

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge 

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge 

AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge

Nos. 18-3254 & 18-3548 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

TIMOTHY EDWARDS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

 Appeals from the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Illinois. 

No. 3:14-CR-30173-DRH-3 

David R. Herndon, 

Judge. 

O R D E R 

More than a year after pleading guilty and receiving a sentence in 2017 for drug 

crimes, Timothy Edwards filed two motions in the district court. The first, under 

Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, requested a new trial. The second 

sought to withdraw his guilty plea under Rule 11. Edwards had pleaded guilty to 

conspiring to distribute cocaine and marijuana, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, lying to 

law enforcement, see 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), and maintaining a drug-dealing premises, 

 

*

 We have agreed to decide the case without oral argument the briefs and record 

adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and oral argument would not 

significantly aid the court. FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION 

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 
Nos. 18-3254 & 18-3548 Page 2 

see 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1), and was sentenced to 84 months in prison. The district court 

denied both motions as legally untenable. 

We agree with the district court’s disposition of both motions. First, Rule 33 

applies only to “tried” cases, and Edwards had no trial because he pleaded guilty. FED.

R. CRIM. P. 33(a); United States v. Graciani, 61 F.3d 70, 78 (1st Cir. 1995); United States 

v. Gordon, 4 F.3d 1567, 1572 n.3 (10th Cir. 1993). Thus, he may not receive a “new” trial. 

Second, under Rule 11, “[a]fter the court imposes sentence, the defendant may not 

withdraw a plea of guilty.” FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(e). Rather, his plea “may be set aside 

only on direct appeal or collateral attack.” United States v. Vinyard, 539 F.3d 589, 594 

(7th Cir. 2008). Edwards attempted a direct appeal, but we dismissed it because it was 

untimely. See Order of Dismissal, United States v. Edwards, No. 17-2436 (7th Cir. July 16, 

2018), ECF no. 33. And he has not brought a collateral attack; he has invoked only Rule 

11 and done so more than a year after sentencing. Rule 35 blocks relief under that 

circumstance. FED. R. CRIM. P. 35(a) (court may not alter sentencing judgment more than 

14 days after its entry). 

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *842Edward Davis, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), rendered June 21, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: April 5, 2006
    /s/ Patrick D. OBrienPatrick D. OBrienChief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000888

01-JUL-2015

07:50 AM
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, James M. Thomas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Georgia-Carolina
Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ James M. ThomasJames M. ThomasChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 08-19

IN RE: COURT CLOSURE ON FRIDAY, JULY 5, 2019

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will 

be closed on Friday, July 5, 2019.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice 

and Procedure, Friday, July 5, 2019, will be considered a day when the Court is closed. See U.S.

VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: June 3, 2019 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002I, Alan Rae, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of 02Diesel Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the small business
 

 
issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 30, 2005/s/ Alan R. Rae
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                     5,172,449.27       8,870,773.60         0.00        165,763,226.39
APO                            0.00          92,612.77         0.00          1,357,438.50
AR                             0.60             100.00         0.00                  0.00
B1                        45,961.63          23,995.58         0.00          1,507,004.42
B2                        27,048.61          14,121.50         0.00            886,878.50
B3                        18,913.02           9,874.08         0.00            620,125.92
B4                        16,241.18           8,479.17         0.00            532,520.83
B5                         5,415.50           2,337.63         0.00            177,662.38
B6                         6,925.77               0.00     4,721.44            265,670.97


</TABLE>