alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32(2)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John F. Corcoran, Chief Financial Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ John F. Corcoran
-----------------------
John F. Corcoran
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Craig A. Knock, Chief Financial Officer of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                       
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 26, 2010 |  | /s/    CRAIG A.
KNOCK                                                                                                                                 
|                     |  | Craig A. Knock
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.
Letter of Continued Employment




 EXHIBIT 10.55 

Pro Acquisition Corporation 

c/o HD Supply, Inc. 

3100 Cumberland Blvd., Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30330 
  

 
 August 10, 2007 

 
 Mr. Joseph J. DeAngelo 

2455 Paces Ferry Road 
 Atlanta, Georgia 30339

  

	 	Re:	Continued Employment with HD Supply, Inc. 


Dear Joe: 
 Reference is made to
your letter agreement, dated as of May 24, 2007, with HD Supply, Inc., and The Home Depot, Inc. (the “Letter Agreement”). 

As you know, Pro Acquisition Corporation has entered into an agreement to acquire HD Supply, Inc., from The Home Depot, Inc. This letter
confirms that, upon and subject to the closing of the acquisition, your employment as an at-will employee will continue on the same terms as those in effect prior to closing. Specifically, after closing (i) your base salary and target annual
cash bonus opportunity will be not less than before closing, (ii) you will remain Chief Executive Officer of HD Supply, Inc., and (iii) your principal place of employment will remain in the same metropolitan area. 

In addition, upon and subject to the closing of the acquisition, you will be covered by a severance arrangement that provides at least 24
months’ base salary continuation (at a rate not lower than your base salary on May 24, 2007) if HD Supply terminates your employment without “cause” (as defined in the Letter Agreement). 

We appreciate your service to HD Supply, and look forward to working with you in the future. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ David A. Novak 

David A. Novak 

Co-President
EXHIBIT 31.02

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Keith A. Jones, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of PDF Solutions, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



/s/ KEITH A. JONES Keith A. Jones Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)


Date:
March 18, 2010

---
Exhibit 32.2
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Xiaogang Zhu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Xiaogang Zhu
----------------------------------
Xiaogang Zhu
Principal Financial Officer
April 16, 2007
null

242.16621
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2022

No. 04-21-00533-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF MAGDALENE B. MZYK, DECEASED

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21-01-00010-CVK

Honorable Joel B. Johnson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 On March 2, 2022, we abated this appeal and remanded it to the trial court for entry of 

a final judgment. We ordered appellant “to ensure that a supplemental clerk’s record with a final, 

appealable order or severance order is filed in this court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of 

this order.” We also ordered appellant “to file a report informing the court of the status of this 

case” if the trial court did not sign a final judgment within that time. On March 4, 2022, 

appellant filed a report indicating that the trial court had not yet signed a final order, but the 

parties are in the process of scheduling a hearing and “[i]t is anticipated that a final judgment 

will be signed within 30 days from the date of this Report.” Appellant requested that we continue 

the abatement “pending the trial court’s disposition of the parties’ respective claims for 

attorney’s fees and entry of final judgment.”

 After consideration, we GRANT appellant’s request and extend the abatement of this 

appeal until May 17, 2022. We ORDER the parties to file a status update by May 17, 2022. We 

ORDER that this case will be reinstated on the court’s docket by May 23, 2022.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20788-20789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-580-835]


Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From the Republic of 
Korea: Extension of Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of 
countervailing duty administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tipten Troidl or Darla Brown, Office 
of AD/CVD Enforcement VI, Group II, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
202-482-1767 or 202-482-2849, respectively.

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination 
within 245 days after the

[[Page 20789]]

last day of the anniversary month of an order/finding for which a 
review is requested and a final determination within 120 days after the 
date on which the preliminary determination is published. However, if 
it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period, 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend these 
deadlines to a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively.

Background

    On October 2, 2000, the Department published a notice of initiation 
of administrative review of the countervailing duty order on stainless 
steel sheet and strip from the Republic of Korea, covering the period 
November 17, 1998 through December 31, 1999 (see 65 FR 58733). The 
preliminary results are currently due no later than May 3, 2001.

Extension of Preliminary Results of Review

    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary 
results of this review within the original time limit. Therefore, the 
Department is extending the time limits for completion of the 
preliminary results until no later than August 31, 2001. See Decision 
Memorandum from Melissa G. Skinner, Office Director for AD/CVD Office 
VI, to Holly A. Kuga, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, dated 
concurrently with this notice, which is on public file in the Central 
Records Unit, Room B-099 of the Department of Commerce. We intend to 
issue the final results no later than 120 days after the publication of 
the preliminary results.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act.

    Dated: April 18, 2001.
Thomas F. Futtner,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-10278 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**CORNELL POINTER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 43 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 14th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED **. The Petition to Remand is** DENIED

**.**
# Legal Service Providers

Have you been approached by a client who may have been victimized by someone engaging in the unauthorized practice of immigration law?

The links below identify resources that will help your clients in avoiding and reporting immigration services scams:
                - Report immigration services  scams in your state;
                - Identify  consumer protection statutes  by state;
                - Identify  federal reporting resources ; and
                - Provide clients with the  resources  they need to avoid immigration services scams

09/12/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of Novadel Pharma Inc. a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

      (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,
2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: December 12, 2003                /s/ Gary A. Shangold, M.D.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gary A. Shangold, M.D.
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

      This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.


                                       15
Opinion filed October 21 , 2010



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 10

- 00 228

- C V

__________

MIN RONG ZHENG AND FA WU MA , Appellant s

V.

BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN

TIRE, L.L.C. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 358 th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D

- 120

, 041

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Min Rong Zheng and Fa Wu Ma’s motion for extension of time in which to file a notice

of appeal was overruled on September 30, 2010. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire,

L.L.C. has now filed in this court a motion to dismiss. The motion is granted, and t he appeal is

dis missed.

October 21 , 2010 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 60551

EDGAR VASQUEZ,

Petitioner

v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondent

Appeal from the Determination of the United States Parole Commission USPC No. 18 USC 4106A

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges

. STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON , Circuit Judge : * In 2012, a court in Mexico convicted Edgar Vasquez of aggravat ed kidnapping

— with an enhancement for carrying out the crime with violence

— and impos ed a 20

- year sentence. Vasquez was later transferred to th e United States under a treaty

. See Tr eaty on t he Execution o f Penal Sentences , U.S.

- Mex., Nov. 25 , 197 6 , 28 U.S.T. 73 99 (entered into force Nov. 30, 1977)

. T he U.S. Parole Commission then calculated Vasquez’s release date and supervised

- release conditions as if Vasquez had been convicted of federal kidnapping in a

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 9, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-60551 Document: 00514421765 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2018No. 16

- 60551

2 United States district court

. See 18 U .S.C. § § 1201, 4106A

. This appeal raises a single issue: whether the Parole Commission pl ai nly erred by employing a two

- level, dangerous

- weapon enhancement to calculate Vasq ue z’s advisory guidelines range

. See U .S.S.G. § 2A4.1(b)(3) (2014)

. Viewing the entire record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we are not persuaded that the Parole Commissi on commit ted “clear or obvious” error. Molina

- Martinez v. United States , 136 S. Ct. 1338, 1343 (2016). We therefore AFFIRM. Case: 16-60551 Document: 00514421765 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/09/2018
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of UNOVA, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael E. Keane, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Michael E. Keane      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Michael E. Keane          |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |   |
| August 9, 2004            |   |

 

----
Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy

Birdie Tyler, and Denise s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 13, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00695

- CV

John M. DONAHUE

, Appellant

v.

Sergeant Jose HERNANDEZ , Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez, Appellee s

From the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 003

- CCL Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On September 10, 2015, the trial court signed an order granting a plea to the jurisdiction filed in the underlying cause by City of Boerne Chief of Police Koe hler and Officer Pablo

Martinez . The order severed those defenda nts from the underlying lawsuit, and those defendants are not parties to this appeal.

On October 2, 2015, the trial court signed two orders granting pleas to the jurisdiction filed by the remaining defendants Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt K rueger, Deputy Birdie Taylor, and Denise Martinez. The orders dismissed all claims against those defendants with prejudice.

On November 5, 2015, appellant filed a notice of interlocutory appeal. Because the trial court’s October 2, 2015 orders disposed of all remaining defendants, this appeal is not an interlocutory appeal. Accordingly, appellant’s notice o f appeal was due to be filed by November 2, 2015. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1. Appellant is incarcerated, and the certificate of service to his

notice of appeal states that he deposited the notice of appeal in the mail on November 1, 2015. Therefore, his notice of appeal is deemed to be timely filed. See Campbell v. State , 320 S.W.3d 338, 344 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2



VERTICALNET, INC.

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Gene S. Godick, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Verticalnet, Inc.,
a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), hereby certify to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ GENE S. GODICKGene S. GodickExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 13, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Verticalnet, Inc. and will be retained by Verticalnet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.1

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Sanofi, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 3, 2016



By:

/s/ Olivier BrandicourtOlivier BrandicourtChief Executive Officer (1)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanofi and will be
retained by Sanofi and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|(1) | Principal executive officer.
|--- | ----------------------------
#### HEINS v. MANHATTAN RY. CO. et al.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

May 7, 1894.)

Appeal—Striking Cause prom Calendar.

When an order has been entered declaring a case abandoned by appellant, and he takes no step to be relieved from the order, or to have the appeal heard on the" judgment roll alone, respondent’s motion to strike the cause from the calendar will be granted.

Action by John D. Heins against the Manhattan Railway Company and another. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Plaintiff now moves to strike cause from the calendar, and for judgment, pursuant to rule 4 of the special rules of the superior court. Granted.

Argued before SEDGWICK, C. J., and FREEDMAN and McADAM, JJ.

William Allan, for plaintiff.

Root & Clarke, for defendants.

*781FREEDMAN, J.

It was the duty oí the appellants to procure the order for the filing of the case after its settlement, on 1893, and to attend to the filing. No sufficient reason has been given why the appellants neglected their duty in this respect. The case having been declared abandoned by an order duly made, entered, and served, and the appellants having taken no steps to be relieved from this order, nor any step to bring the appeal before the general term upon the judgment roll alone, the respondent’s motion should be granted, with costs. All concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ixia Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 23, 2007
    /s/ Errol GinsbergErrol GinsbergPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 23, 2007
    /s/ Thomas B. MillerThomas B. MillerChief Financial Officer 96