alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DONG CHOL KIM, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-60714

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 17, 2011.

Mark Edward Jacobs, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Joseph D. Hardy, Jr., Esq., Trial Attorney, Tangerlia Cox, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KING, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

South Korean native and citizen Dong Choi Kim petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) concluding that he was removable because his conviction for making a false statement on an income tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) qualified as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M). Kim concedes that a § 7206(1) offense may qualify as an aggravated felony for immigration purposes, but he contends that the Government failed to carry its burden of proving that his § 7206(1) offense involved a loss of more than $10,000. Our review of the record controverts this assertion.

The record contains the indictment and judgment for Kim’s offense, which establish that the actual loss was $54,232. Because the indictment charged both Kim and his wife, Kim contends that the government has failed to establish the amount of the loss that is attributable solely to Kim. However, spouses who file a joint tax return, such as Kim and his wife, are jointly and severally liable. *See*26 U.S.C. § 6013(d)(3); *Cheshire v. Comm’r of Inter*
      *486
      *nal Revenue,*282 F.3d 326, 331 (5th Cir. 2002). So the entire amount is attributable to Kim. The indictment and judgment constitute “reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence” and show that the Government has established Kim’s removability by clear and convincing evidence. *See Arguelles-Olivares v. Mukasey,*526 F.3d 171, 178 (5th Cir.2008). The petition for review is DENIED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *Has.*limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Centiv, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”), each of the undersignedhereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 18, 2004 | By:    | /s/    Mak Wai Keung, Shawn |   |   |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer                         |
|                |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |
|                |   |
|                |   |
| Dated: May 18, 2004 | By:    | /s/    Lau Kwok Hung        |   |   |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer                         |
|                |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### ROCHESTER DISTILLING CO. v. DEVENDORF.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by the Rochester Distilling Company against Mary M. Devendorf.

No opinion. Motion for reargument or fqr leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied. See 25 N. Y. Supp. 200.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,022
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,740
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     13,324
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         25,440
<ALLOWANCE>                                        888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,781
<DEPOSITS>                                      36,257
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                425
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  47,781
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    577
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  206
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    39
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   822
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 330
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 330
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              492
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     75
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          75
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        46
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     7.5
<LOANS-NON>                                        117
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   835
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                        53
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  888
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               888
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            480
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9996]



[[Page 21397]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of North Dakota; Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 00-003. Applicant: University of North Dakota, Grand 
Forks, ND 58202-7129. Instrument: Scanning Tunneling Microscope, Model 
STM 25. Manufacturer: Omicron Associates, Germany. Intended Use: See 
notice at 65 FR 11986, March 7, 2000.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) ability to 
operate at temperatures as low as 25 deg.K, (2) a vibrationally-
isolated vacuum chamber capable to 10 -11 mbar and (3) conduction of 
electron-tunneling spectroscopy measurements using the STM. The 
National Institute of Standards and Technology and a university 
research center for advanced microstructure devices advise that (1) 
these capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose 
and (2) they know of no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended 
use (comparable case).
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-9996 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 2000-1
$ 349,390,000.00 Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000




           PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
              DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
          ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-2000
 Feb-2000
 Mar-2000
 Apr-2000
 May-2000
 Jun-2000
 Jul-2000  11,622,997   1,727,692           0    0.00%    1,894,356    0.55%
 Aug-2000   9,916,610   2,042,526           0    0.00%    4,385,206    1.32%
 Sep-2000   9,735,267   2,009,576      69,294    0.26%    5,218,761    1.61%
 Oct-2000   9,389,834   1,951,574     138,289    0.53%    5,834,693    1.85%
 Nov-2000   9,547,997   1,889,120     207,149    0.81%    7,198,704    2.35%
 Dec-2000   8,968,800   1,834,457     386,783    1.56%    7,487,994    2.52%
          ____________ ___________ ___________
   Totals  59,181,506  11,454,944     801,515

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Thomas M. Mason, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof Centiv, Inc;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:

 

a.             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and

 

c.             disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.             all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 8, 2003 |   | /s/ Thomas M. Mason |                    |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                       |   |                | Thomas M. Mason         |
|                       |   |                | Chief Financial Officer |
|                            |        |                     |                         |  |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 04-15

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGE

O R D E R

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), may recall

Senior Judges of the Court who have retired but who have agreed to be available for such recall

when their service is needed by the Court, and

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Senior Judge

William P. Greene, Jr., would provide substantial service necessary to meet the needs of the Court,

and

WHEREAS Senior Judge Greene has consented to be available for recall as needed by the

Court,

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that, effective June 16, 2015, Judge William P. Greene, Jr., is recalled from

retired status to have and to exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in

active service and to otherwise perform substantial service with the Court as requested by the Chief

Judge. Judge Greene shall serve until the Chief Judge of the Court determines that his service is no

longer needed or until June 30, 2015, whichever is sooner. Each day of service shall be recorded and

maintained by the Clerk of the Court.

DATED: June 16, 2015 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 21015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing in the National Register were received by the National Park 
Service before April 14, 2001. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 
60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties 
under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded to 
the National Register, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., NC400, 
Washington, DC 20240. Written comments should be submitted by May 11, 
2001.

Carol D. Shull,
Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places.

ARKANSAS

Madison County

Williams House and Associated Farmstead, AR 1, St. Paul, 01000508

Marion County

Oak Grove Cemetery, 7th St., Des Arc, 01000507

CALIFORNIA

San Luis Obispo County

Carrizo Plain Rock Art Discontiguous District, Address Restricted, 
California Valley, 01000509

LOUISIANA

Caddo Parish

Mason House, 103 Ardmore, Shreveport, 01000512

Webster Parish

Fitzgerald House, 304 McDonald, Minden, 01000510

NORTH CAROLINA

Caldwell County

Poe, Edgar Allan, House, 506 Main St. NW, Lenoir, 01000514

Cleveland County

Central School Historic District, Roughly N. Battleground Ave., N. 
Piedmont Ave., E. King St., E. Ridge Ave., and N. Gaston St., Kings 
Mountain, 01000513

Robeson County

Rowland Depot, W. Main St. and W. Railroad St., Rowland, 01000511

TEXAS

Jasper County

Aldridge Sawmill, (Early Twentieth Century Logging Industry Historic 
Resources on the National Forests and Grasslands in Texas MPS), S 
side of Angelina National Forest, Zavalla, 01000515

Webb County

Laredo US Post Office, Court House and Custom House, 1300 Matamoros, 
Laredo, 01000516

UTAH

Uintah County

Carter Road, Ashley National Forest, Ashley National Forest, 
01000517

    A request for removal has been made for the following resources:

Beaver County

Beaver High School, (Beaver MRA), 150 N. Main St., Beaver, 82004077

Salt Lake County

Jordan High School, 9351 S. State St., Sandy, 84002203
Technical High School, 241 N. 300 West, Salt Lake City, 80003934

Summit County

Silver King Ore Loading Station, Park Ave., Park City, 78002698

Utah County

Bullock, Benjamin Kimball, Farmhouse, 1705 S. State, Provo, 85003042
Lehi Fifth Ward Meetinghouse, 121 N. 100 East, approx., Lehi, 
92001688

Weber County

Burch-Taylor Mill, 4287 Riverdale Rd., Ogden, 82004186

[FR Doc. 01-10290 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed  consolidated balance sheet of the Company at December 31, 2000 and is
is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               3,858
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                           807
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     8,798
<PP&E>                                              61,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                      41,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      62,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6,914
<BONDS>                                             39,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               100
<OTHER-SE>                                          10,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        62,925
<SALES>                                             25,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    25,008
<CGS>                                               10,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       15,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1,670
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (14,243)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (28,792)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (28,792)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     82,851
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        54,059
<EPS-BASIC>                                           5.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         5.92



</TABLE>
#### WATERLOO WAGON CO., Limited, Respondent, v. KIENETZ, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

October 2, 1896.)

Action by the Waterloo Wagon Company, Limited, against Andrew Kienetz.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>






27.1                                Financial Data Schedule

This schedule contains Summary Financial  Information extracted from the Balance
Sheet,  Statement of Operations and Statement of Cash Flows included in our Form
10-Q for the period ending  January 1, 2000, and is qualified in our entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                 177,037
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                           64,892
<ALLOWANCES>                           (18,494)
<INVENTORY>                             49,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       291,285
<PP&E>                                 118,290
<DEPRECIATION>                         (30,541)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         476,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   79,863
<BONDS>                                 22,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                    68
<OTHER-SE>                             353,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           476,668
<SALES>                                132,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       132,807
<CGS>                                   66,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           66,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        43,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (3,120)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         25,618
<INCOME-TAX>                             9,735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     15,883
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            15,883
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.23



</TABLE>
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

LOUISVILLE LADDER, INC., Appellant

v.

WERNER CO., Appellee

______________________

2021

- 1114

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019

- 00336.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

T ERRY L EON W RIGHT

, J R

., Stites & Harbison, PLLC, Louisville, KY, argued for appellant. Also represented by

J OEL T. B ERES

.

C HARLES M. M C M AHON

, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by

T HOMAS D A M ARIO ; M ICHAEL S. N ADEL , Washingto n, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is Case: 21-1114 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 08/31/2021O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE

, Chief Judge

, P ROST and

T ARANTO

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

August 31, 2021

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 21-1114 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 08/31/2021