alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.2

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-146265) and Forms F-3 (File Nos. 333-114504
and 333-130632) of ViryaNet Ltd. pertaining of our report dated July 15, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of ViryaNet (Pty) Ltd (a wholly-owned subsidiary of ViryaNet Ltd.), to be included in Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report (Form 20-F) of ViryaNet Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                          
|--------------------------
|Nexia ASR                 
|ABN 16 847 721 257        
|                          
|/s/ George S. Dakis       
|Partner                   
|Audit & Assurance Services
|Melbourne, Australia      
|September 28, 2011        



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----
|value beyond numbers nexia asr abn 16 847 721 257 level 18 / 530 Collins Street Melbourne Australia
3000 telephone +61 3 9608 0100 facsimile +61 3 9608 0192 email theteam@nexiaasr.com.au website www.nexiaasr.com.au |  | LOGO

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or omissions of
financial services licensees
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5761 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to expedite the 

application of the provision prohibiting rescissions of health insurance 

coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2010 

Mr. MELANCON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to expedite the application of the provision prohibiting 

rescissions of health insurance coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPEDITING APPLICATION OF THE PROHIBI4 TION ON RESCISSIONS OF HEALTH INSUR5 ANCE COVERAGE UNDER PPACA. 

6 Section 1004(b) of the Patient Protection and Af7 fordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘RULE.—The amendments’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘RULE. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5761 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

3 paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(2) RULE FOR RESCISSIONS.— 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 2712 of the 

6 Public Health Service Act, as inserted by sec7 tion 1001(5), shall take effect on the date of 

8 enactment of this Act. 

9 ‘‘(B) APPLICATION DURING INTERIM PE10 RIOD.—In the case a group health plan or 

11 health insurance issuer offering group or indi12 vidual health insurance coverage rescinds such 

13 plan or coverage with respect to an enrollee, in 

14 violation of such section 2712 of the Public 

15 Health Service Act, during the period beginning 

16 on March 23, 2010, and ending on the date of 

17 the enactment of this paragraph— 

18 ‘‘(i) the plan or issuer shall reinstate 

19 such enrollee in the plan or coverage and 

20 claims for services furnished to such en21 rollee during such period may be submitted 

22 to the plan or issuer for reimbursement 

23 and treated as if such rescission had not 

24 occurred; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5761 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the plan or issuer shall not be 

2 subject to any penalty for any such viola3 tion occurring during such period.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         341,803
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                       875
<INVENTORY>                                      3,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               354,799
<PP&E>                                         105,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 577,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,678
<BONDS>                                        357,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                     187,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   577,238
<SALES>                                          5,596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,596
<CGS>                                            4,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,413
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,904)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-3236

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Brandon Davis, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 17, 2012

Filed: May 4, 2012

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

AfterBrandon Davis pleaded guilty to a child-pornography production offense,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(b), (e), and possession of child pornography, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), the district court sentenced him to a total of 1

480 months in prison, to be followed by lifetime supervised release. On appeal, his

counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that Davis’s sentence is unreasonable.

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Arkansas.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in sentencing Davis, and that the court imposed a substantively reasonable

sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc)

(in reviewing sentence for abuse of discretion, appellate court first ensures that

district court committed no significant procedural error, and then considers

substantive reasonableness ofsentence); see also UnitedStates v. Borromeo, 657 F.3d

754, 757 (8th Cir. 2011) (district court has wide latitude in weighing 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factors and in assigning some factors greater weight than others).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6398
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LAURIE F. BESSINGER, Warden; VAUGHN JACKSON, Captain; TERRELL CANNON, SR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-96-2217-0-23BD) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Kevin Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief onhis 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Bessinger , No. CA-96-2217-0-23BD (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                                GENE LOGIC INC.
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 1998

                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended
                                                            September 30,               September 30,
                                                       -----------------------     -----------------------
                                                          1998          1997         1998            1997
                                                       ---------       -------     ---------       -------
<S>                                                    <C>             <C>         <C>             <C>     
BASIC AND DILUTED:

Weighted average common shares outstanding                14,906           726        14,345           667

Net loss                                               $ (37,788)      $(1,936)    $ (41,356)      $(4,751)

Accretion of mandatory redeemable value of 
  convertible preferred stock                                 --           542            --           909
                                                       ---------       -------     ---------       -------
Net loss attributable to common stockholders           $ (37,788)      $(2,478)    $ (41,356)      $(5,660)
                                                       =========       =======     =========       =======
Net loss per common share                              $   (2.54)      $ (3.41)    $   (2.88)      $ (8.48)
                                                       =========       =======     =========       =======
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: TEXAS FARMERS

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Relator. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00120

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Texas Farmers Insurance Company , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Angie Juarez Barill, Judge of the 346th District Court of El Paso County

Texas. Relator asks the Court to issue a writ of mandamus requiring Respondent: (1) to vacate

her orders denying a plea in abatement and a motion to compel appraisal, as well as her order s

denying Relator’s motion s to reconsider; and (2) to order appraisal and sever the extra

contractual claims from the breach of contract claim, and/or abate the extra

- contractual claims

until the breach of contract claim is fully resolved.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. Fi rst, the

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004)

. Second, the relator must demonstrate- 2

-

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudent ial Insurance Company of America

,

148 S.W.3d at 1 35

- 36

. Based on the record before us, we conclude that Relator has not

established it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is

denied. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 52.8(a)

.

October 18, 2013

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.b

================================================================================

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Theodore Misiewicz, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                       /S/ THEODORE MISIEWICZ
                                                       -----------------------

           Date: December 23, 2005                     Theodore Misiewicz
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON BINGAMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 40 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5

th day of December, 2023, the “King’s Bench” Petition is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Army announces the general availability of exclusive, partially exclusive, or nonexclusive licenses under the following patent that is listed in the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         paragraph.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Robert Rosenkrans at U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, phone (508) 233-4928 or E-mail: Robert.Rosenkrans@natick.army.mil.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404. The following Patent, Title, and Issue date is provided:

*Patent Number:*                     09/165,043.                

*Title:*                     Enzyme-Catalyzed Modifications of Macromolecules in Organic Solvents.                

Issue Date: April 3, 2001.

Luz D. Ortiz,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-10010  Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Unassociated Document


    Ex.-10(f)(iii)

    


    EXTENSION OF
LEASE

    DATED DECEMBER 31,
1994

    BETWEEN

    HOWARD SIEGEL, as
Landlord

    And

    AMERICAN MEDICAL ALERT
CORP., as Tenant

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              The
      parties previously entered into a written Lease of premises 3265 Lawson
      Blvd., Oceanside, New York on December 31, 1994 for a term commencing on
      January 1, 1995 and ending on December 31, 1999.  The
      aforementioned Lease was further extended by Extension Agreement dated
      February 9, 1998 until September 30, 2007; thereafter the Lease was
      extended by Extension Agreement dated June 7, 2007 through March 31, 2008;
      and, thereafter was extended by Extension Agreement dated January 23, 2008
      through September 30, 2008.  Thereafter, the term was extended
      by Extension Agreement dated August 19, 2008 through December 31,
      2009.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.  

            	
              The
      term of the Lease currently expires and terminates as of December 31,
      2009.

            


    

    


    
      	
              3.  

            	
              The
      parties do hereby agree to extend the Lease from January 1, 2010 through
      December 31, 2012.

            


    

    


    
      	
              4.  

            	
              All
      the current and existing terms, covenants and conditions of the original
      Lease dated December 31, 1994, as amended by Agreements set forth above
      are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Extension of
      Lease.  During the term of extension of Lease from January 1,
      2010 through December 31, 2012, the current terms and conditions of the
      Lease including, but not limited to, annual rent presently in effect shall
      remain in full force and effect and the Tenant shall not be subject to any
      additional increase during the extension
period.

            


    

     

    
      
        	 	
              	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                Dated: November
      17, 2009

              	
                By:
      

              	/s/ Howard
      Siegel	 
	 	 	Howard
      Siegel, Landlord	 
	 	 	
              	 
	 	 	 	 


      

    

     

    
      
        	 	American Medical Alert
      Corp.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                 

              	
                By:
      

              	/s/ Jack
      Rhian	 
	 	 	      
                Jack
      Rhian, Chief Executive Officer & President
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Veronica Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
July 20, 2009





/s/ Veronica ChenVeronica
      Chen,
                Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51029

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN CARLOS ADAN GONZALEZ-UGARTE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-647-ALL

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Adan Gonzalez-Ugarte

(Gonzalez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has filed a response.

Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Gonzalez’s response

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-51029

2

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We have issued our reports dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Broadwind Energy, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Broadwind Energy, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160039, effective June 17, 2009).   /s/   GRANT THORNTON LLPGRANT   THORNTON LLPChicago, IllinoisMarch 16,   2011