alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2
 RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY
GEORGIA-CAROLINA BANCSHARES, INC.
 July 26, 2010
     Fair Market Value shall mean, as applicable, (i) the average closing price
of the Corporations common stock quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (or other national
quotation service) for the ten business days prior to the date of Board approval and grant. If the
Corporations shares of common stock are not traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or
through any nationally recognized quotation service, the fair market value of the Corporations
common stock shall be determined by the Board, acting in good faith, under any method consistent
with the Code, or Treasury Regulations thereunder, as the Board shall in its discretion select and
apply at the time of the grant of the award concerned. Subject to the foregoing, the Board, in
fixing the Fair Market Value, shall have full authority and discretion and be fully protected in
doing so.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE        Exhibit 31.2
                               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Harry J. Santoro, the Chief  Financial  Officer of GAVELLA CORP., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GAVELLA CORP.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
registrant and have:

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
     is being prepared;

 b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
      and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
      the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
      evaluation; and


 c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
      control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
      registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
      fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
      affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):


 a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
      or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
      reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls over financial reporting.


Date: March 30, 2004                 /s/ Harry J. Santoro
                                    -----------------------------
                                    Harry J. Santoro, Chief Financial Officer
Opinion issued August 30 , 201 2 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 1
- 0 0845
- CR

——————————— LARRY F. ERNESTON , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. 98
- CCR
- 077087

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Larry F. Erneston , has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a)

. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the appeal

.2

Accordingly, we order the appeal reinstated and we dismiss the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. We direct the Clerk to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this opinion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 18.1.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Kenny, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kellam, J.), rendered August 3, 1983, convicting him of attempted reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance, Gary C. Di Leonardo is relieved as attorney for the defendant, the brief filed by him is deemed stricken, Samuel Bernstein, of 616 East 18th Street, Brooklyn, New York, is hereby substituted as the defendant’s counsel, and is directed to serve and file a brief in accordance herewith on or before December 14, 1987, and the respondent shall serve and file a supplemental brief on or before December 30, 1987.

Assigned counsel submitted a brief wherein he states that the defendant "contends that the allocution was insufficient”. However, the remainder of counsel’s brief is dedicated to the proposition that the plea allocution "was indeed sufficient”. As the Court of Appeals noted in its recent decision in *People v Vasquez*(70 NY2d 1, 4), counsel thereby disparaged the claim his client wanted addressed and "for all practical purposes, precluded his client [if he was so advised] from presenting [it] effectively in a *pro se*brief’. Accordingly, new counsel must be assigned and consideration of the appeal deferred until the filing of further briefs. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Order entered September 11, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00057-CV

LOU D. VASQUEZ AND NILDA A. VASQUEZ, Appellants

V.

FIREBIRD SFE I, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-05077-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to extend time to file brief. We GRANT the 

motion and ORDER the brief received by the Clerk of the Court September 9, 2019 filed as of 

the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of ITSA Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hermano Studart Lins de
Albuquerque, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Hermano Studart Lins de Albuquerque
---------------------------------------
Hermano Studart Lins de Albuquerque
Chief Executive Officer



July 2, 2003
- How To Appeal 
    - Court Forms  and Fees        - Court Forms
      - Fee Schedule
      - Filing Fee 
    - Court Rules and Procedures        - Rules of Practice  and Procedure
      - Procedural Requirements for Staff Conferences
      - Internal Operating Procedures
      - Rules of Admission  and Practice
      - Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability
      - E-Filing Rules
      - Court Process
      - Court Efforts to Ensure Compliance with Court Rules 
    - Information About Practitioners        - Search List of Practitioners
      - Disciplinary Action
      - Key Points in Finding a Representative
      - Compendium of Disciplinary Grievances 
    - Orders and Opinions        - Miscellaneous Orders
      - Ceremonial Orders
      - Opinions and Full Court Orders
      - Search Decisions and Opinions
      - Recent Decisions / Opinions
      - Case Archives 
    - Active Panel Cases 
    - Stayed Cases 
    - Class Action Cases 
    - Electronic Filing 
    - Docket Search 
    - Oral Arguments        - Schedule
      - Oral Arguments via YouTube Live
      - Audio/Video
      - Oral Argument Educational Outreach 

Oral Argument Educational Outreach
Back

USCAVC 16thJudicial ConferenceSeptember 19-20, 2024

Watch CAVC Oral Arguments on YouTube

Changes to Court Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability - EffectiveJanuary 10, 2024

In the News: Articles

----
EXHIBIT 31(a)

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Kinney, chief executive officer of Technology Acquisition Corporation
("Registrant") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB ("Report") of Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  Registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions  about the  effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  Registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to the  Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  Registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

                                        Date: June 29, 2004

                                        /s/ John Kinney
                                        ---------------
                                        John Kinney, Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 99-2229

GARY M. JANSSEN , APPELLANT,

V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and HOLDAWAY and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

On July 6, 2001, the appellant filed a motion for an extension of time to file a response

to this Court's April 23, 2001, briefing order. On that date, the appellant also filed a motion for leave

to file the extension motion 13 days out of time. The Court notes that not only is this the second

such motion, but that the previous motion for extension was also filed out of time. John Stevens

Berry, the attorney of record for the appellant, indicated in this most recent motion that failure to file

a timely response to the Court's April 23, 2001, order was due to the month-long hospitalization of

Korey Reiman, the appellant's other attorney. However, Mr. Berry does not indicate what, if

anything, prevented him from filing a timely motion for an extension of time to file the response, if

not the actual response itself. Furthermore, the Court points out to Mr. Berry that he has a

responsibility to monitor the status of this case, and either to respond to Court orders or to seek an

extension of time to do so in a timely manner, notwithstanding Mr. Reiman's illness. 

On July 13, 2001, prior to the Court's ruling on these motions, the appellant filed yet another

motion for an extension of time (seeking up to another 30 days) and a motion requesting clarification

as to the Court's April 23, 2001, order. The Court will grant the two July 6, 2001, motions and grant

in part the July 13, 2001, motion and will allow the appellant until July 26, 2001, to file the response

ordered. As for the appellant's motion for clarification, the Court expresses its concern about the

circumstances under which that motion was received, given the not particularly complicated nature

of the language involved that the appellant seeks to clarify, as well as the fact that this motion was

accompanying a third consecutive request for an extension of time to respond. The Court cautions

counsel to be more conscientious in the future as to when matters are due or risk being denied

extensions of time to comply. By way of clarification, the appellant must address whether he seeks

to waive the applicability of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-475,

114 Stat. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000) (VCAA), to the rating-increase claim on appeal, being mindful that

he cannot know precisely what benefits he might receive under the VCAA because the Secretary has

not yet promulgated regulations dealing with the VCAA. 

 

Accordingly, it is 
2

ORDERED that the appellant's July 6, 2001, motions are granted. It is further

ORDERED that the appellant's July 13, 2001, motions are granted in part and to the extent

provided herein. It is further 

ORDERED that, not later than July 26, 2001, the appellant file and serve on the Secretary

a response to this Court's April 23, 2001, order. 

DATED: July 20, 2001 PER CURIAM.
China Packaging Technologies, Inc. - Exhibit 10.8 - Filed by
   newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.8 

Form of Purchase Agreement 

(English Summary) 

	Parties to Contract 	Great Shengda as Buyer , Anhui
      Shanying Paper Ltd and Ma’anshan Tianfu Paper 
	  	Products Co., Ltd. as Vendor
  
	 	 
	Name of Products 	S-1 Paper used for Carton 
	 	 
	Brand 	Anhui Shanying Paper Ltd. 
	 	 
	Standard of Model 	120-140g 
	 	 
	Producer 	Anhui Shanying Paper Ltd. 
	 	 
	Price 	3,450 per ton 
	 	 
	
      Purchase 
	
      The Buyer fax the purchase order to the Vendor 7 days
      before the purchase and the request will be processed after the Vendor’s
      acknowledgement. The two parties will consult with each other for special
      orders. 

	 	 
	Location of Delivery 	In the factory of the Buyer

	 	 
	Transportation 	By vehicle 
	 	 
	Payment Method 	Monthly payment, in 45 days after
      delivery 
	 	 
	Governing Law 	China’s Contract Law
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


RULE13a-14(b)/RULE15d-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT


AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Compugen Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Dikla Czaczkes Axselbrad




Title:           Chief Financial Officer


Date:           March 21, 2011
China Valves Technology, Inc.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.1  

ASSET TRANSFER AGREEMENT
 

	Party A: Henan Tonghai Fluid Equipment Co., Ltd. 
	Party B: Shanghai Pudong Hanwei Valve Co., Ltd. (“Hanwei
      Valve”) 
	Party C: Shanghai Hanhuang Valve Co., Ltd 
	Party D: Hong Kong Hanxi Investment Co., Ltd.





	Party C and Party D established Hanwei Valve on January 23,
      2002 to be a manufacturer of high-end valves used in petroleum chemical
      industry. Upon friendly consultation, Party A, B, C and D have reached the
      following agreement (the “Agreement”) on April 8, 2010: 
	  
	Section 1. Transfer Price 
	  
	Party B, C and D agree to sell all of the assets of Hanwei
      Valve to Party A for a consideration of $21 million (the price may be
      adjusted upon the asset evaluation). 
	  
	Section 2. Representations and Warranties




	1. 	
      Party C and Party D represent that the tangible and
      intangible assets of Hanwei Valve (including but not limited to land,
      buildings, equipment and intellectual property) are not subject to any
      collateral, pledge, lien or any third party claims. Party C and Party D
      will take all responsibilities arising out of any claims if the
      representations are not accurate.

	 	 
	2. 	
      Party C and Party D represent that they will not be
      directly or indirectly engaged in any business that may be competitive
      with Hanwei Valve, its technology or products in ten years from the
      execution of the Agreement.

	 	 
	3. 	
      Any cash in Hanwei Valve’s accounts before the execution
      of the Agreement belongs to Party C and Party D.

	 	 
	4. 	
      The parties will further discuss any matters not covered
      in this Agreement.



Section 3. Execution.  

The Agreement becomes effective upon execution by all the
parties.  

Section 4. Miscellaneous.  

1. Each party keeps one copy of the executed Agreement for
record. 

2. Any dispute shall be brought to Henan Zhengzhou Middle Court. 




	Party A: 	/s/ 	 	Legal Representative of Henan Tonghai Fluid
      Equipment Co., Ltd. 
	Party B: 	/s/ 	 	Legal Representative of Shanghai Pudong Hanwei
      Valve Co., Ltd. 
	Party C: 	/s/ 	 	Legal Representative of Shanghai Hanhuang Valve
      Co., Ltd 
	Party D: 	/s/ 	 	Legal Representative of Hong Kong Hanxi
      Investment Co., Ltd.
(85 South. 922)

#### LYONS v. PEGUES et al.

(2 Div. 702.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 29, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; B. M. Miller, Judge.

Craig & Craig, of Selma, for appellant.

Pettus, Fuller *'&*Lapsley, of Selma, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by agreement of parties.
H. R. 6200 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To amend part A of title XI of the Social Security Act to provide for a 1-year 

extension of the authorizations for the Work Incentives Planning and Assistance 

program and the Protection and Advocacy for Beneficiaries of Social Security 

program. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘WIPA and PABSS Extension 

Act of 2010’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR THE WORK INCENTIVES 

PLANNING AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND THE PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY FOR BENEFICIARIES OF SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM. 

(a) WORK INCENTIVES PLANNING AND ASSISTANCE.—Section 

1149(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–20(d)) is 

amended by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

(b) PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY FOR BENEFICIARIES OF SOCIAL

SECURITY.—Section 1150(h) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–21(h)) 

is amended by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

SEC. 3. CONFORMING CHANGES TO THE WORK INCENTIVES PLANNING 

AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

(a) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Section 1149 of the Social Security Act 

(as amended by section 2(a)) is further amended by redesignating 

subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively, 

and by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) ANNUAL REPORT.—Each entity awarded a grant, cooperative 

agreement, or contract under this section shall submit an annual 

report to the Commissioner on the benefits planning and assistance 

provided to individuals under such grant, agreement, or contract.’’. 

(b) ONE-YEAR CARRYOVER.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1149(b)(4) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

1320b–20(b)(4)) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘(4) ALLOCATION OF COSTS.—The costs’’ 

and inserting the following: 

‘‘(4) FUNDING.— 

‘‘(A) ALLOCATION OF COSTS.—The costs’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) CARRYOVER.—An amount not in excess of 10 percent of the total amount obligated through a grant, cooperative agreement, or contract awarded under this section 
H. R. 6200—2 

for a fiscal year to a State or a private agency or organization shall remain available for obligation to such State 

or private agency or organization until the end of the 

succeeding fiscal year. Any such amount remaining available for obligation during such succeeding fiscal year shall 

be available for providing benefits planning and assistance 

only for individuals who are within the caseload of the 

recipient of the grant, agreement, or contract as of immediately before the beginning of such fiscal year.’’. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by paragraph 

(1) shall apply with respect to amounts allotted under section 

1149 of the Social Security Act for payment for a fiscal year 

after fiscal year 2010. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.