T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HA R C HA R AN S I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73605 A ge nc yN o. A 047- 659- 172 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B e f o r e : F A R R I S , O ’S C A N N L A I N , an dB Y B E E , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . H a r c ha r a n S i ngh, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B o ar do f I m m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ o rd ersu m m ar il y a ff irm in g an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s (“ IJ ”) deci si on s a ff

i rm i ng the agency’ s t erm i nat i on of S i ng h’ s c on di t i on al r e s i de nc ys t a tus a nd de ny i ng S i ngh’ s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of



# FI LED MA R 30 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73605 2 re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al evi dence, D a m o n v . A s h c r o ft , 360 F . 3d 1084, 1088 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , a nd w e de ny th e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the IJ ’ s det erm i nat i on thatS i ng h’ s c on di t i on al r e s id e n c ys ta tu s w a s p r o p e r lyte rm in a te da n dS in g h w a s s ub je c t to r e m o v a l, se e 8 U . S . C . § 1186a , w he r e S i ngh’ s c i t i z e n- s pous e di s c l os e d s he di vor c e d he rhus band t o m a rryS i ngh, he re x- hus ba nd’ s br othe r , f ori m m i gr a t i on purpos e s , a nd the m a rr i a ge w a s notc ons um m a t e d. Se e D am on , 360 F . 3d a t1089 ( t e s tf orabonaf

i de m arri age i s w hether the coup l e i nt ended t o est abl i sh a l i fe t og ether a tthe t i m e they w e r e m a rr ie d ) ; s e e a l

s o Ba rk v . I NS , 511 F . 2d 1200, 1201- 02 ( 9th C i r . 1975) ( c o n du c t o f

p a rtie s a f

te rm a rr ia g e is r e le v an t to s h o w in te n t a t tim e o f m arr ia g e ) . In ad d it io n , sub stan ti al ev id en ce su p p o rts th e I J’s d eterm in atio n th at S in g h ’s experi ence s i n Ind i a, i ncl ud i ng on e det ent i on and m i stre atm entby Indi an po l i ce , di d notc ons t i tut e pe r s e c ut i on . See G u v. G on zales , 4 5 4 F .3 d1 0 1 4 , 1 0 1 9 - 2 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2006) . S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e a l s o s upport s the I J ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tS i ngh f a ile dto e s tab lis h h e h a s aw e ll- f o u n d e df e aro f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n . See N ahrv ani v. G on zales , 399 F . 3d 1148, 1154 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( e vi de nc e di d notc om pe l f i ndi ng th a t p e titio n e r ’s f

e a ro f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n w a s o b je c tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le ) . A cco rd i n g l y, S i n g h ’ s asyl u m cl ai m fai l s.07- 73605 3 B e c aus e S i ngh f

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e e l i gi bi l i tyf ora s y l um , he di d not s a tis f yth e m o r e s tr in g e n t s tan d a r df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.