alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1992

Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure 

Robert E. Keeton, Chairman 

Thomas E. Baker 

William Bertelsman 

Frank H. Easterbrook 

T. S. Ellis, III 

Alan W. Perry 

Edwin J. Peterson 

George C. Pratt 

Dolores K. Sloviter 

Alicemarie H. Stotler 

Alan C. Sundberg 

William R. Wilson 

Charles Alan Wright 

Daniel R. Coquillette, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules

Kenneth F. Ripple, Chairman 

Danny J. Boggs 

Donald F. Froeb 

Cynthia H. Hall 

E. Grady Jolly 

James K. Logan 

Arthur A. McGiverin 

Luther Munford 

Stephen F. Williams 

Carol Ann Mooney, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules

Edward Leavy, Chairman 

James J. Barta 

Alice Batchelder 

Adrian Duplantier 

Kenneth N. Klee 

Ralph R. Mabey 

Paul Mannes 

Joseph L. McGlynn, Jr. 

James W. Meyers 

Herbert P. Minkel, Jr. 

Harold L. Murphy 

Gerald K. Smith 

Henry J. Sommer 
Charles Tabb 

Alan N. Resnick, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

Sam C. Pointer, Jr. Chairman 

Wayne D. Brazil 

David Doty 

Carol J. Hansen Fines 

Francis H. Fox 

Richard W. Holmes 

Mark Kasanin 

Stewart Newblatt 

Paul V. Niemeyer 

Mark A. Nordenberg 

Anthony Scirica 

Phillip A. Wittman 

Edward H. Cooper, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules

Wm. Terrell Hodges, Chairman 

G. Waugh Crigler 

Sam Crow 

W. Eugene Davis 

John Doar 

D. Lowell Jensen 

Tom Karas 

Rikki J. Klieman 

Edward F. Marek 

George M. Marovich 

Joseph H. Rodriguez 

Stephen A. Saltzburg 

David A. Schlueter, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules

Ralph K. Winter, Chairman 

Wayne D. Brazil 

Kenneth S. Broun 

Harold G. Clarke 

Gregory P. Joseph 

John M. Kobayashi 

James K. Robinson 

Stephen Saltzburg 

Milton I. Shadur 
Fern M. Smith 

Jerry E. Smith 

James T. Turner 

Margaret A. Berger, Reporter
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 09/09-5279]


Notice of Surrender of License

    Notice is hereby given that Asian American Capital Corporation, 
located at 1251 West Tennyson Road, Suite 4, Hayward, California 94544, 
has surrendered its license to operate as a small business investment 
company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(the Act). Asian American Capital Corporation was licensed by the Small 
Business Administration on February 23, 1981.
    Under the authority vested by the Act and pursuant to the 
Regulations promulgated thereunder, the surrender was acted on this 
date, and accordingly, all rights, privileges and franchises derived 
therefrom have been terminated.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.11, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: April 17, 2001.
Harry E. Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 01-10097 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Last substantive revision (Transmittal GR-17) January 20, 2010 

Last revised (minor technical changes) February 6, 2019

Guide to Judiciary Policy

Vol. 7: Defender Services

Pt. A: Guidelines for Administering the CJA and Related Statutes

Ch. 3: Authorization and Payment for Investigative, Expert, or Other Services

Appx. 3A: Sample Request for Advance Authorization for 

Investigative, Expert or Other Services

TO: Chief Judge (or Delegate) __________________

 United States Court of Appeals for the __________ Circuit

DATE: ______________________________________________

FROM: ______________________________________________

SUBJECT: Advance Authorization for Investigative, Expert, or Other Services

It is requested that advance authorization be granted to obtain services in an 

amount in excess of the maximum allowed under the provisions of subsection (e)(3) of 

the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, [or, for capital cases commenced, and 

appellate proceedings in which an appeal is perfected, on or after April 24, 1996, 

under 18 U.S.C. § 3599(g),] as follows:

Case Name & Designation 

Name of Expert or Investigator or Service Provider

Address ____________________________________________________________

Type of Service ______________________________________________________

Reasons for Application

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Estimated Compensation (Non-Capital Case) $______________________________

Estimated Compensation and Expenses (Capital Case) $ _____________________
Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 7A, Appx. 3A Page 2

Estimated Compensation and Expenses of All Investigative, Expert, and Other Services 

(Capital Case) $ ___________________________

I certify that the estimated compensation in excess of the maximum set forth in 

18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(3) [or, if applicable, the estimated compensation and expenses in 

excess of the maximum set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3599(g),] appears necessary to provide 

fair compensation for services of an unusual character or duration and therefore 

recommend approval of this advance authorization in the amount of

$___________________________

______________________________ ___________________________

United States District Judge Date

or United States Magistrate Judge

Advance authorization is hereby approved in the amount of

$___________________________.

____________________________________ ________________________

Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals Date

(or Delegate)
##### 





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gene Logic Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Mark D.
Gessler, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Philip L. Rohrer, Jr.,
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

| |     |                                                                           |  |  |     |                                                                                      
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Mark D. GesslerMark D. Gessler
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002 |  |  | By: | /s/ Philip L. Rohrer, Jr.Philip L. Rohrer, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2002
- How To Appeal 
    - Court Forms  and Fees        - Court Forms
      - Fee Schedule
      - Filing Fee 
    - Court Rules and Procedures        - Rules of Practice  and Procedure
      - Procedural Requirements for Staff Conferences
      - Internal Operating Procedures
      - Rules of Admission  and Practice
      - Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability
      - E-Filing Rules
      - Court Process
      - Court Efforts to Ensure Compliance with Court Rules 
    - Information About Practitioners        - Search List of Practitioners
      - Disciplinary Action
      - Key Points in Finding a Representative
      - Compendium of Disciplinary Grievances 
    - Orders and Opinions        - Miscellaneous Orders
      - Ceremonial Orders
      - Opinions and Full Court Orders
      - Search Decisions and Opinions
      - Recent Decisions / Opinions
      - Case Archives 
    - Active Panel Cases 
    - Stayed Cases 
    - Class Action Cases 
    - Electronic Filing 
    - Docket Search 
    - Oral Arguments        - Schedule
      - Oral Arguments via YouTube Live
      - Audio/Video
      - Oral Argument Educational Outreach 

Back

USCAVC 16thJudicial ConferenceSeptember 19-20, 2024

Watch CAVC Oral Arguments on YouTube

Changes to Court Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability - EffectiveJanuary 10, 2024

In the News: Articles

----
#### Muhammad Jalal-Deem AKBAR, Appellant, v. Warden Brian JETT, Appellee.

No. 11-1642.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 29, 2011.

Filed: July 5, 2011.

Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar, Rochester, MN, pro se.

David Gerald Wilhelm, Gregory G. Brooker, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon careful review, we conclude that Akbar was not entitled to habeas relief for the reasons *628relied upon by the district court. *See Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n,*538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Akbar’s motion for release and motion to expedite.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, then United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now United States District Judge.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 1501

In re: NORMAN PAUL FELTS , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. ( 5:21

- hc

- 02111

- FL )

Submitted : September 20, 2023 Decided: October 6, 2023

Before AGEE and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Normal Paul Felts, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1501 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/06/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Norman Paul Felts petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from this c ourt directing the district court to permit him to appeal the district court’s order finding that he is a sexually dangerous person and committing him to the custody of the Attorney General

. Felts has also filed a motion to expedite the decision. We conclude that Felts is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drast ic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear r ight to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires.” Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Co rp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). To the extent Felts seeks an order directing that he be permitted to appeal, his appeal of the district court’s order has been docketed in this court as United States v. Felts , No

. 23

- 6894, so his request is moot. To the extent he seeks to challenge the district court’s dangerousness finding by way of mandamus, we deny the petition because Felts may raise these arguments in his appeal of the district court’s order

. Accordingly, we d eny the petition for writ of mandamus and deny the motion to expedite . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are USCA4 Appeal: 23-1501 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/06/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
P ETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1501 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/06/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
AND CCC SURETY OPERATIONS EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
AND SCHEDULES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           430,700
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      28,082
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 514,976
<CASH>                                          10,538
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              70,110
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          93,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 879,808
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                166,169
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            207,345
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                101,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           441
<OTHER-SE>                                     347,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   879,808
<PREMIUMS>                                     151,241
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             14,468
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 230
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      27,260
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     62,512
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            26,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,728
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,220
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(2)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John F. Corcoran, Chief Financial Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly
      period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ John F. Corcoran
-----------------------

John F. Corcoran
Chief Financial Officer


                                       4
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications

I, Chunman Zhang, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pingchuan
Pharmaceutical, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this  report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small
business issuer and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 14, 2006             /s/ Chunman Zhang
                                 ----------------------------------------
                                 Chunman Zhang, Chief Financial Officer
#### Frank J. Covelli et al., Appellants, v Long Island Lighting Co., Respondent.

In a negligence action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered March 21, 1986, as dismissed the first and third causes of action of the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ case.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The trial court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the causes of action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services. Although the plaintiffs did adduce sufficient proof to demonstrate that the defendant, a utility, breached the duty to them to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance of the power lines, there is no evidence in this record to establish that the defendant’s breach of its duty was a proximate cause of the plaintiffs’ alleged injuries *(see, Francois v Commercial Hotel,*131 AD2d 540; *Edwards v Nemenyi,*92 AD2d 785, *affd*61 NY2d 800). Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
[S-A-M-P-L-E]

APPELLANT'S BRIEF

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

No. 00-0000

JOHN Q. VETERAN,

Appellant

v.

________________________________________,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Appellee

Oliver W. Counsel

Lawyr & Lawyr

1111 J Street, NW

Washington, DC 20000

(202) 555-1212

Attorney for Appellant

Form 2

(Rev 5/99)
- Home
- The Department
- Office of Inspector General

# Investigations

 

The Assistant Inspector General for Investigations is responsible for the overall investigative and oversight activities of OIG relating to the programs and operations of the United States Capitol Police.OIG investigates violations of regulation or law and is responsible for the prevention, detection, and investigation of fraud, waste, and abuse in connection with USCP programs and operations.
                  - Contact Information

**Contact:**

Corey Aittama, Assistant Inspector General for InvestigationsCorey.Aittama@uscp.gov

Main: (202) 593-3868Fax: (202) 593-4643HOTLINE: Toll Free 1-866-906-2446

## The Department

              - Our Mission
              - Our History
              - Executive Team
              - United States Capitol Police Memorial Fund
              - Office of Inspector General
              - Bureaus and Offices
              - Human Capital Strategic Plan
              - Oversight
              - USCP Department Strategic Plan