alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

 

CERTIFICATION

 

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of Hydrogenics Corporation(the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)on June 30, 2009 and amended by this Amendment No. 1 filed with theCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,Daryl Wilson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:                                          | /s/ Daryl Wilson |   |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
|                                         |             |   |
| Name: Daryl Wilson                           |             |
|                                         |             |
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |             |

 

Date: August 12, 2009

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will beretained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.1

                                LOGILITY, INC.
            Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings (Loss)
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                  July 31,
                                                        -------------------------------
                                                            1999               1998
                                                        ------------       ------------
<S>                                                     <C>                <C>
Common Stock:
      Weighted average common                                 13,402             13,563
          shares outstanding

Dilutive effect of outstanding
           stock options *                                       205                  -
                                                        ------------       ------------
                     Total                                    13,607             13,563
                                                        ------------       ------------

Net earnings (loss)                                     $        828       $     (3,420)
                                                        ============       ============
Earnings (loss) per common share

              Basic                                     $       0.06       $      (0.25)
                                                        ============       ============
              Diluted                                   $       0.06       $      (0.25)
                                                        ============       ============
</TABLE>

*    Stock options are not included in the three months ended July 31, 1998
calculation because they would have an anti-dilutive effect on the loss per
share.

                                      17
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 12, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 0020 9

- CR

Rodolfo Cisneros, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODW IN, AND FIELD MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal

. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of c onviction to reflect that the “ Statute

for Offense” is “21.021 (a)(1)(B), (2)(B) Penal Code

. ” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed

.

The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 02-720

ROBIN E. HELMER, APPELLANT,

V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and FARLEY and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

On November 13, 2003, the Court vacated the April 18, 2002, Board of Veterans' Appeals

decision that denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death and remanded the matter

for readjudication. On December 4, 2003, the appellant, through counsel, filed a timely motion for

a panel decision. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the parties' prior pleadings, and the record

on appeal, it is

ORDERED that the appellant's motion for a panel decision is denied.

DATED: February 25, 2004 PER CURIAM.

STEINBERG, Judge, concurring: I voted to deny the appellant's motion for a panel decision.

I agree with the appellant that it would be preferable for the Court in the instant appeal to address

the question of law presented by the appellant as to whether cancer in the larynx that metastacized

from a cancer not listed as presumptively service connected in 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(e) (2003), adopted

pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1116(b), is a presumptively service-connected disease under that regulation,

taking into consideration 38 U.S.C. §§ 1113, 1116(a)(1) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.307(d) (2003); cf. VA

Gen. Coun. Prec. 18-97 (May 2, 1997). See Mahl v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 37, 40-47 (per curiam

order) (2001) (Steinberg, J., dissenting). Nonetheless, I believe that the decision in the Court's

dispositive order in the instant case that the BVA should address that question of law, with an

adequate statement of reasons or bases under 38 U.S.C. § 7104(a), (d)(1), before the Court

undertakes to do so is a reasonable one under the circumstances of this case and does not warrant

the intervention of a panel.
**Exhibit13.2**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

 

CERTIFICATION

 

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of Hydrogenics Corporation(the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)on June 30, 2009 and amended by this Amendment No. 1 filed with the Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, LawrenceDavis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| By:                            | /s/ Lawrence Davis |   |
|--------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                           |               |
| Name: Lawrence Davis           |               |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |               |

 

Date: August 12, 2009

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will beretained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### SCUDDER et al. v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Municipal Corporations—Review op Assessment—Injunction.

Under Laws 1882, c. 410 (Consolidation Act), § 897, prescribing the remedy for an improper assessment, the enforcement of an illegal assessment will not be enjoined.

Appeal from special term, Hew York county.

Action by Hewlett Scudder and others, as trustees under the will of Henry J. Scudder, deceased, against the mayor and commonalty of city of Hew York, for an injunction. From a judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

Argued before .O’BRIEH, FOLLETT, and PARKER, JJ.

Joseph A. Flannery, for appellants.

George L. Sterling, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This suit is brought to restrain the sale of certain real property in the city of Hew York, owned by plaintiffs, for an unpaid assessment for a local improvement. The complaint was dismissed upon the grounds—First, that the assessment was void upon its face; and, second, that the remedy by injunction has been taken away by statute.1 The facts appearing bring this case clearly *423within the authorities of Sixth Ave. R. Co. v. Mayor, etc., 63 Hun, 271, 17 N. Y. Supp. 903, and People ex rel. Consolidated Gas Co. v. Myers, 65 Hun, 14, 19 N. Y. Supp. 723, which are decisions of this court, and therefore controlling. It was suggested upon the argument that these cases were questioned or overruled by some later decisions in the court of appeals, and reference was made to the case of People ex rel. Martin v. Myers, 135 N. Y. 465, 32 N. E. 241. We are unable to understand how this contention can be sustained, in the face of the language of the opinion, which, among other cases, cites with approval People ex rel. Consolidated Gas Co. v. Myers, supra. The judgment should accordingly be affirmed, with costs.

1

 Laws 1882, c. 410, § 897.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MILLENNIUM CAPITAL VENTURE HOLDINGS,
INC.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Francis Mailhot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Francis Mailhot
    ------------------------
    Francis Mailhot
    Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 14, 2005
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April 18, 2011 |   |                                    |
|---------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                            |   |   /s/ Jamie L. Mancl               |
|                            |   | Jamie L. Mancl                          |
|                            |   | President (principal executive officer) |

----

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                              BEST SOFTWARE, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                      MARCH 31,
                                                              -------------------------
                                                                 1998          1997
                                                              -----------   -----------
                                                              (UNAUDITED)   (UNAUDITED)
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding
Common stock equivalents:...................................     10,981        6,731
  Preferred stock...........................................         --          625
  Dilutive effect of Stock options and warrants.............         --          527
  Warrant exercise..........................................         --          473
Assumed common share issuance for dividends
  in excess of earnings.....................................         --           --
Weighted average shares outstanding.........................     10,981        8,356
                                                                =======       ======
Net (loss) income...........................................    $  (402)      $2,104
                                                                =======       ======
Basic net (loss) income per share...........................    $ (0.04)      $ 0.31
                                                                =======       ======
Diluted net (loss) income per share.........................    $ (0.04)      $ 0.25
                                                                =======       ======
</TABLE>
 
                                       17
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allergy Research Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr.
Stephen A. Levine, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 10, 2006

                                                By:  /s/ Stephen A. Levine
                                                     ----------------------
                                                Dr. Stephen A. Levine
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Allergy Research Group, Inc. and
will be retained by Allergy Research Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### CITY OF SYRACUSE, Respondent, v. LAKESIDE PAPER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by the city of Syracuse against the Lakeside Paper Company.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.'
XHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Lee Cole, Chief Executive Officer of Bioaccelerate Holdings,
Inc. (the Company) and Linden J.H. Boyne, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, do each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

1. The annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Lee Cole
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Lee Cole
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       June 10, 2005



                                       /s/ Linden J H Boyne.
                                       -----------------------
                                       Linden J H Boyne
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       June 10, 2005
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5825 

AN ACT 

To review, update, and revise the factors to measure the 

severity, magnitude, and impact of a disaster and to 

evaluate the need for assistance to individuals and households. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5825 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multi-State Disaster 

3 Relief Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INDIVIDUAL ASSISTANCE FACTORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to provide more objective 

6 criteria for evaluating the need for assistance to individ7 uals and households and to speed a declaration of a major 

8 disaster or emergency under the Robert T. Stafford Dis9 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 5121 et seq.), not later than one year after the date of 

11 enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal 

12 Emergency Management Agency (referred to in this Act 

13 as the ‘‘Administrator’’), in cooperation with representa14 tives of State and local emergency management agencies, 

15 shall review, update, and revise through rulemaking the 

16 factors considered under section 206.48(b) of title 44, 

17 Code of Federal Regulations, to measure the severity, 

18 magnitude, and impact of a disaster. 

19 (b) CONSIDERATION OF A CONTIGUOUS COUNTY.— 

20 In reviewing, updating, and revising the factors referenced 

21 in subsection (a) the Administrator shall include as a fac22 tor whether a contiguous county in an adjacent state has 

23 been designated in a major disaster or emergency as a 

24 result of the same incident. 

25 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 months after the date 

26 of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit 
3 

•HR 5825 EH

1 to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

2 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

3 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Sen4 ate a report on the Federal Emergency Management 

5 Agency’s current regulations, policies, procedures, and 

6 practices on— 

7 (1) recommending major disaster or emergency 

8 declarations in order to provide assistance to individ9 uals and households; and 

10 (2) making post-declaration designations of the 

11 need for assistance to individuals and households in 

12 a county that is contiguous to a State that has re13 ceived a major disaster or emergency declaration for 

14 the same incident. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5825 

AN ACT 

To review, update, and revise the factors to measindividuals and households. aster and to evaluate the need for assistance to ure the severity, magnitude, and impact of a dis-
#### McCRUDEN, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

March 27, 1894.)

Action by Bridget McGruden against the Rochester Railway Company.

Argued before DWIGHT, P. J., and LEWIS, HAIGHT, and BRADLEY, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, on opinion of Rumsey, J., at the circuit. 25 N. Y. Supp. 114.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTIION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the annual report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment 1 for the year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Noel J. Guillama, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Signed on September 19, 2008



/s/ Noel J. Guillama

Noel J. Guillama

Chief Executive Officer of The Quantum Group
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 26, 2018

NO. 03
- 17
- 00771
- CV

Texas Jewelers Association, Rex Solomon, and Brad Koen, Appellant s

v. Ann Glynn, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUN TY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PURYEAR AND BOURLAND AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART
--

OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the i nterlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on October 27, 2017. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the court’s interlocutory order . Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s
i nterlocutory order to the extent that it denied appellants’ motion to dismiss Ann Glynn’s
defamation claim as to Brad Koen and her tortious

- interference claim as to all three appellants,
and render s judgment dismissing those claims. We affirm the trial court’s interlocutory order in all other respects

. T he parties each shall bear one

- half the costs relating to this appeal, both in
this Court and in the court below.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 97-2323

JAMES F. FRITZ, APPELLANT,

 V.

TOGO D. WEST, JR.,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court as to the appellant's application for attorney fees pursuant to

the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA). In a November 23, 1999, opinion,

the Court held in abeyance further proceedings on the EAJA application and directed the appellant

to "file a verification as to whether or not he approves of the submission of the instant EAJA

application." Fritz v. West, 13 Vet.App. 190, 196 (1999). On December 21, 1999, the appellant filed

a document entitled: "SUBMISSION UNDER PROTEST OF VERIFICATION OF APPELLANT OF HIS

CONSENT TO COUNSEL'S SUBMISSION OF AN EAJAAPPLICATION TO THIS COURT" and a supplemental

EAJA application.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary file a

response to the appellant's supplemental EAJA application.

DATED: January 18, 2000 PER CURIAM.