alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of amendment to Master Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.ii.a 
 AMENDMENT TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This
AMENDMENT TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered into on this              day of December, 2009 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Cargill,
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“Cargill”) and The Mosaic Company, a Delaware corporation (“Mosaic”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Cargill and Mosaic are parties to that certain Master Services Agreement dated
December 29, 2006 (the “Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the
term; and 
 WHEREAS, capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein will have the meaning
ascribed to them in the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein
contained and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby revised to provide that the term of the Agreement is extended until December 31, 2010. 

  

	 	2.	Except as expressly provided herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective duly authorized
representatives as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	CARGILL, INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	  




			
	Name:	 	  




			
	Title:	 	  




			
	
	THE MOSAIC COMPANY
		
	By:	 	  




			
	Name:	 	  




			
	Title:
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Richard A. Wickett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




December 19, 2002



By:

/s/ Richard A. WickettRichardA. Wickett Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1

                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Intraop Medical  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Donald A. Goer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                        /s/   Donald A. Goer
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Donald A. Goer
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                                        Date:  December 22, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
* This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not

materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral

argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and

10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

October 28, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

October 28, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FERNANDO VAZQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7040

(D.C. No. 6:07-CR-00047-RAW-11)

(E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, LUCERO, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the

appeal waiver contained in defendant Fernando Vazquez’s plea agreement. The

defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and

distribution of controlled substances. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the

defendant waived his right to appeal his conviction or his sentence, provided his

sentence was within the statutory maximum authorized by law and within the
-2-

advisory sentencing guideline range determined by the district court to apply. 

The defendant’s sentence was below the statutory maximum and within the

advisory guideline range. Nevertheless, the defendant filed a notice of appeal. 

The government filed a motion to enforce the plea agreement pursuant to

United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). 

In response, the defendant’s counsel stated that there are no non-frivolous

arguments that can be presented in response to the motion to enforce, citing

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), and requesting permission to

withdraw as counsel. This court gave the defendant an opportunity to file a pro se

response to the motion to enforce, see id., and granted him an extension of time to

file his response to the motion. To date, the defendant has not filed a response to

the motion to enforce. 

Under Anders, we have reviewed the motion and the record and we

conclude that the defendant’s proposed appeal falls within the scope of the appeal

waiver, that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights, and that

enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. See Hahn,

359 F.3d at 1325 (describing the factors this court considers when determining

whether to enforce a waiver of appellate rights).
-3-

Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to enforce the appeal waiver, GRANT

counsel’s motion to withdraw, and DISMISS the appeal. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of April 23, 2001.

A closed meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 25, 2001, at 11:00 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), (9)(A), 9(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (4), (5), (7), (8), (9)(i), 9(ii), and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matters of the closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, April 25, 2001 will be:

institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and

institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

Dated: April 18, 2001.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10092  Filed 4-19-01; 12:42 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 2906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1352-DR]


Alabama; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Alabama (FEMA-1352-DR), dated December 18, 2000, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective December 22, 2000.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

      
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-1029 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### Carol J. Chavoustie, Respondent, v Robert B. Shaad, Appellant.

— Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in imposing a money sanction as a condition of vacating a default judgment and by permitting the judgment to stand as security. When the court granted an order permitting defendant’s counsel to withdraw, further proceedings were stayed pursuant to CPLR 321 (c). Since the default judgment was obtained during the stay, it was a nullity and should have been vacated without condition *(see, Firemen’s Fund Ins. Co. v Dietz,*110 AD2d 1083; *J. C. S. Design Assocs. v Vinnik,*85 AD2d 572). (Appeal from order of *533Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — vacate default judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,354
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,412,788
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,390
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,548,665)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,354
<SALES>                                        231,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,480
<CGS>                                               66
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (178,313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (170,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (178,313)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 17, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00239- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.G, A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 507th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-52545

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from an order signed January 2, 2018. Appellant filed a letter on April 17, 2018, stating that after the order on appeal was signed, the underlying case was transferred from Harris County to Chambers County. Appellant filed a notice of appeal in the Harris County case and in the Chambers County case. The appeal from Chambers County was assigned to the First Court of Appeals on April 3, 2018. The appeal from Harris County was assigned to this court on April 5, 2018. As a result, the order on appeal in this court is the subject of an earlier-assigned appeal in the First Court of Appeals.
Due to the earlier-filed appeal pending in the First Court of Appeals, we2

notified the parties on April 23, 2018, that we would dismiss this appeal on or after May 4, 2018, unless any party showed meritorious grounds for retention of the appeal. No response was filed.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Busby.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

CEREMONIAL MISC. NO. 01-20

IN RE: THE MATTER OF THE RETIREMENT OF ROGER E.JOHNSON 

Before BARTLEY, Chief Judge, and PIETSCH, GREENBERG,

ALLEN, MEREDITH, TOTH, and FALVEY, Judges, and

NEBEKER, KRAMER, HOLDAWAY, GREENE, KASOLD, 

HAGEL, MOORMAN, LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Senior Judges.

O R D E R

Before the Court is the matter of the retirement of Roger E. Johnson, whose commitment to helping 

others has marked his distinguished career. Before Mr. Johnson became our colleague at the Court, he 

served in the United States Navy and as a civilian employee of the United States Army. He began serving 

the country in 1972 when he enlisted in the Navy, carrying out duties that included managing enlisted 

records and training sailors in equal opportunity matters, at times while deployed on the aircraft carrier 

U.S.S. John F. Kennedy. In 1980, Mr. Johnson brought his talents and experience to the Army as a civilian 

employee specializing in civilian personnel management and administration of the Army Materiel 

Command's expansive overseas travel program.

Roger Johnson arrived at the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in February 1991.

From his first day at the Court and for the nearly 30 years that followed, Mr. Johnson drew on the 

administrative skills and discipline he developed in Navy and Army service to provide exemplary service 

to the Court as an Administrative Analyst.

During his tenure at the Court, Mr. Johnson demonstrated talent and skills in many areas, and he has 

served the Court and its Judges with loyalty and professionalism. His wide-ranging responsibilities have 

included coordinating all Court travel, heading up the Court's emergency response programs and teams, 

serving as an Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor, facilitating access to training for Court 

employees, and managing all areas of obtaining CLE credit for judicial conference attendees. Roger has 

also spearheaded the Court's annual Combined Federal Campaign, each year leading the Court's response 

to the needs of others, with passion and dedication. And in all that he does, Roger Johnson leads by 

example with a rare combination of professionalism, grace, humility, good humor, and remarkable 

kindness.

Mr. Johnson has regularly been recognized for outstanding performance. Most notably, he is one of 

only 14 Court employees to have received the Frank Q. Nebeker Award for exceptional and exemplary 

service to the Court. Roger Johnson is an invaluable employee whose loyalty and public-spirited service 

are evident to all who interact with him and he will be keenly missed.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, and as he departs to enjoy retirement, it is 

ORDERED that Roger E. Johnson take with him our gratitude for the many years of outstanding 

service he has rendered to the Court, our admiration for his many accomplishments, the warmth of our 

continued friendship, and our very best wishes.

DATED: May 31, 2020 PER CURIAM.
**EXHIBIT 32.1        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alberto DiBella, Chief Executive Officer and Principal        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2009                    

/s/ Alberto DiBella                       Alberto DiBella

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.2Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.333-57664, 333-120169 and 333-134783, and Form S-3 No. 333-139964) of Third Wave Technologies, Inc.and in the related prospectuses of our report dated March 4, 2005, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Third Wave Technologies, Inc., for the year ended December 31,2004, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.   Milwaukee, Wisconsin ERNST & YOUNG LLP
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intermec, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended April 2, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fredric B. Anderson, Vice President andController, acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Fredric B.  Anderson                                           |     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Fredric B.  Anderson                                               |     |
| *Vice  President and Controller**(Acting Chief Financial Officer)* | * * |
| May 12, 2006                                                       |     |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jeffrey CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10868

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

Susan Cowger, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Charles Ernest Baruch, The Law Office of Chad Baruch, Rowlett, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jeffrey Campos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Campos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.