alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Craig Burton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether
or not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: March 30, 2005
                                 /s/ Craig Burton
                                 ----------------
                                 Craig Burton, President /Chief Accounting
                                 Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7716

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARTHUR WAYNE CLEMMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:05-cr-00277-AW-1; 8:09-cv-03235-AW)

Submitted: March 3, 2011 Decided: April 15, 2011

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Wayne Clemmer, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Wayne Clemmer seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) 

and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions. We dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed.*

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order denying Clemmer’s § 2255 

motion was entered on the docket on July 29, 2010 and its order 

denying his timely Rule 59(e) motion was entered on the docket 

on August 18, 2010. Clemmer asserts he placed his first notice 

 * Clemmer has filed a notice of appeal from a district court 

order purporting to deny his first notice of appeal as untimely. 

Because the district court is without the authority to deny an 

appeal, even if apparently untimely, we treat this as an appeal 

solely from the orders denying Clemmer’s § 2255 and Rule 59(e) 

motions.
3

of appeal in the prison’s internal mailing system for mailing on 

November 3, 2010. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276

(1988). Crediting this version of events, Clemmer’s first 

notice of appeal was nevertheless untimely by over two weeks. 

Because Clemmer failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to 

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6140 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6140

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4865 Tallmadge Road in Rootstown, Ohio, as the ``Marine Sgt. Jeremy 
                        E. Murray Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2010

 Mr. Ryan of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4865 Tallmadge Road in Rootstown, Ohio, as the ``Marine Sgt. Jeremy 
                        E. Murray Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARINE SGT. JEREMY E. MURRAY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4865 Tallmadge Road in Rootstown, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Marine Sgt. Jeremy E. Murray Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marine 
Sgt. Jeremy E. Murray Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [OR-030-01-1020-PE: GP1-0068]

# AGENCY:

Vale District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Meeting of John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council (RAC): Pendleton, Oregon February 12-13, 2001.

# SUMMARY:

                        On February 12, 2001 at 11 a.m. there will be a meeting of the John Day/Snake RAC at the Red Lion Hotel, 304 Southeast Nye Avenue in                               ( print page 2928)                            Pendleton, Oregon. The meeting is open to the public. Public comments will be received at 10 a.m. on February 13, 2001. The following topics will be discussed by the council: RAC membership update; Hells Canyon Subgroup update; Blue Mountain Subgroup update; ICBEMP Subgroup update; OHV Subgroup update; Noxious Weeds Subgroup udpate; Program of work review; Counties Payment Act (1608 Act); and a 15 minute round table for general issues.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandy L. Guches, Bureau of Land Management, Vale District Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, Oregon 97918, Telephone (541) 473-3144

Sandy L. Guches,

Acting District Manager.

[FR Doc. 01-1005 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GREG DEWAYNE HERRING,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 173 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CAO CERTIFICATION
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Verticalnet, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 By:
    
    /s/ JONATHAN T. COHENJonathan T. CohenVice President and Chief Accounting Officer
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00089

- CV

M ARLENE W. M ITCHELL
, Appellant

V

.

W ILMINGTON S AVINGS F UNDS S OCIETY
, FSB, D / B / A C HRISTIANA T RUST AS O WNER T RUSTEE OF THE R ESIDENTIAL C REDIT O PPORTUNITIES T RUST III , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at
Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2017

- 005148

- 1)

January 10, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the tria l court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_______________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
(August 27, 1987)

#### In the Matter of Thomas H. Oberle, Appellant, v Rose Caracappa, Respondent-Respondent, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Rose Caracappa as a candidate in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 15, 1987, for the public office of Suffolk County Legislator, Fourth Legislative District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated August 25, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this proceeding the petitioner challenges the validity of the certificate of authorization permitting Rose Caracappa to be designated for nomination on the Republican Party line. The proceeding was properly dismissed since the petitioner failed to join as a necessary party the Executive Committee of the Suffolk County Republican Committee *(see,*CPLR 1001 [a]; *Matter of Curcio v Wolf,*133 AD2d 188).

In any event, were we to reach the substantive issue in this case, on this record, we would conclude that there is no merit to the appellant’s contention. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Peter B. Day,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Endo Networks, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2003 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents in all material  respects the  financial
condition and results of operations of Capitol First Corporation.


                                  By: /s/ Peter B. Day
                                      -------------------
                                  Name:   Peter B. Day
                                  Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW140574] 

                    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW140574 for lands in Johnson County, Wyoming, was timely filed and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date of termination. The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively.                

                    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 to reimburse the Department for the cost of                           ( print page 21470)                        this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW140574 effective February 1, 2000, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Mary Jo Rugwell,

Acting Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.

[FR Doc. 00-9953 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

I, Brian T. McGee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report
of Intellon Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Intellon Corporation.

Date: March 27, 2008



By:

/S/    BRIAN T.
MCGEEBrian T. McGee Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Julius WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Johnny Ray Harper, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 10-30764, 10-30800

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 17, 2011.

Josette Louise Cassiere, Assistant U.S. Attorney, James G. Cowles, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Billy James Guin, Jr., Rountree & Guin, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Julius Walker and Johnny Ray Harper appeal their sentences following guilty pleas to conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base. Walker was sentenced to a 188-month term of imprisonment, the lowest sentence in his advisory sentencing guidelines range, while Harper received a 240-month statutory minimum sentence due to a sentence enhancement imposed pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851.

Walker argues that his sentence is unfair due to the disparity in punishments for crack and powder cocaine offenses in effect at the time of his sentencing. He raised this issue at sentencing, but the district court concluded that regardless of the disparity, a 188-month sentence was appropriate under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) due to quantity of drugs involved, his role in the conspiracy, and his previous criminal history. He has not shown that this sentence is unreasonable. *See United States v. Rodriguez,*523 F.3d 519, 526 n. 1 (5th Cir.2008).

We find no merit in Walker’s alternative contention that he should be resentenced pursuant to the amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that became effective on November 1, 2010. *See United States v. Rodarte-Vasquez,*488 F.3d 316, 322 (5th Cir.2007); *United States v. Fields,*72 F.3d 1200, 1216 (5th Cir.1996).

*487Harper argues that his sentence should be vacated because the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 applies retroactively to persons on direct appeal; however, he correctly concedes that the argument is foreclosed by our decision in *United States v. Doggins,*633 F.3d 379, 384 (5th Cir.2011).

Accordingly, the defendants’ sentences are AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of USIP.Com,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kathy  Christopher,
Controller  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Kathy Christopher
---------------------
Kathy Christopher
Controller, USIP.Com, Inc.


March 24, 2005

USIP.Com,  Inc. does not have a "Chief Financial  Officer," Kathy Christopher is
the principal financial and accounting officer.





                                  END OF FILING
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.4


NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100
Brampton, Ontario  L6T 5P6
Canada


February 28, 2002


PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Nicholas J. DeRoma, Esq.
One Chedington Place, Suite 8D
North York, Ontario
M4N 3R4

Dear Nick:

Reference is made to your employment agreement with Nortel Networks Limited
(formerly Northern Telecom Limited, the "Company") dated April 27, 1997 (the
"Employment Agreement").

This will confirm that the Company has extended the terms of Section 3 of the
Employment Agreement so that the Company will continue to "gross-up" your base
salary and annual incentive award such that your after-tax compensation will be
the same as if you were a resident of the State of Connecticut to an annual
maximum of nine percent of your base salary and annual incentive award (the
"Gross-up"). The Gross-up will be effective from June 1, 2000 until March 1,
2002.

The Company will review the payment of the "Gross-up" on an annual basis and
will determine whether the "Gross-up" shall continue for the next calendar year.

Yours truly,

"WILLIAM J. DONOVAN"

William J. Donovan
Senior Vice-President, Human Resources


I Acknowledge and Agree to the terms and conditions as outlined in this
document.



                                             "NICHOLAS J. DEROMA"
                                           -------------------------------------
                                              Nicholas J. Deroma