alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [66 FR 19591, April 16, 2001]

# STATUS:

Closed meeting.

# PLACE:

450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED:

April 11, 2001.

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

Cancellation of Meeting.

The closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, April 18, 2001 at 11:00 a.m. has been canceled.

Dated: April 18, 2001.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10091 Filed 4-19-01; 12:42 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-312-051]

Take notice that on April 17, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing an Errata Letter filing in the above-referenced docket.

Tennessee states that the Errata Letter Filing contains a complete copy of a Gas Transportation Agreement between Tennessee and Virginia Power Energy Marketing, Inc. (VEPCO) pursuant to Tennessee's Rate Schedule FT-A (FT-A Service Agreement). Tennessee further states that the copy of the FT-A Service Agreement that was filed on April 11, 2001 in this docket inadvertently omitted certain pages of the agreement.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with § 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with § 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10321  Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 99.4****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Hydrogenics Corporation of ourAuditors’ Report dated March 7, 2008 relating to its consolidated balance sheets as at December 31,2007 and its consolidated statements of operation and deficit and cash flows for each of the threeyears in the period ended December 31, 2007, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the registration statements(Nos. 333-77004 and 333-116321) on Form S-8 for the Employee Stock Option Plan of Hydrogenics datedApril 19, 2000, as amended and restated on May 30, 2003./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
EXHIBIT 10.4

Promissory Note


$1862.00                                                      June 14, 2002
                                                          Newport Beach, CA


     On Demand  for value received the undersigned promises to pay in
lawful money of the United States of America to the order of Mezzanine
Associates, LLC, nominee or assignee, the sum of One Thousand Eight Hundred
Sixty Two Dollars ($1162.00), with interest from June 14, 2002 until paid
at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum).

     Should interest not be paid, it shall thereafter bear interest as the
principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an
amount equal to simple interest on the principal at the maximum rate
permitted by law.  The undersigned hereby waives presentment of payment,
protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and diligence in bringing
suit, and further agrees, in case suit is instituted, to collect this
Promissory Note or any portion thereof, to pay such additional sum for
attorneys' fees as the Court may adjudge reasonable in such suit.



				Saiph Corporation



				By: Eric C. Bronk
				_________________________________
				Eric Chess Bronk, President
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TERRY CUSICK,

Appellant,

v.

SEACOAST NATIONAL BANK and

RENEE CAREY,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-1782

[April 6, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Elizabeth A. Metzger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

21000076CPAXMX.

Jason M. Wandner of Jason M. Wandner, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Owen Schultz and Kenneth A. Norman of McCarthy, Summers, Wood, 

Norman, Melby & Schultz, P.A., Stuart, for appellee Seacoast National 

Bank.

Scott Konopka and Donna L. Eng of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, 

Konopka, Thomas & Weiss, P.A., Stuart, for appellee Renee Carey.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
99.7  SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION  (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of  Hydrogenics Corporation (the Company) as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on
the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
Pierre Rivard, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, of the Company,
certify, that:  (1)          
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)          
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   By:
  /s/Pierre RivardName: Pierre RivardTitle: President, Chief Executive Officer and
  DirectorDate: March 31, 2005   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will be retained by
Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 14-19

IN RE: COURT CLOSURE ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2019.

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will 

be closed on Friday, November 29, 2019.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice 

and Procedure, Friday, November 29, 2019, will be considered a day when the Court is closed. 

See U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: October 16, 2019 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report
of Compugen Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the periods ending December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronit Lerner
Title:      Chief Financial Officer
Date:       April 2, 2008



---

---
(85 South. 923)

#### NOEL v. GRIFFIN & SATTERWHITE.

(7 Div. 84.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 1, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; S. L. Brewer, Judge.

Hooton & Vann, of Roanoke, for appellant.

N. D. Denson & Sons, of Opelika, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellee.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7367

CHRISTOPHER D. CROMARTIE, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY-PRISONS; 

ASHLEY JONES; QUEEN GERALD,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Joi Elizabeth Peake, Magistrate Judge. (1:18-cv-00479-LCB-JEP)

Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr., seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation to dismiss Cromartie’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. This court 

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen 

v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The magistrate judge’s 

recommendation is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral 

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, FRANK A. DUNN, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K ofNortel Networks Limited;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and we have:
(a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report(the “Evaluation Date”); and
(c)     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
(a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
(b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: December 23, 2003   “FRANK A. DUNN”
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0584

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

MICHAEL JACOB DUNNE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Robert J. Whelan, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 22 2023

03/22/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0584
#### Lowery v. The State.

Appeal from Pike Criminal Court.

Tried before the Hon. E. B. Wilkerson.

Rioi-iardson & Folmar, and M. N. Carlisle, for appellant.

Charles G. Brown, Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion by

McClellan, C. J.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for living in adultery with Lake Lawson, a woman.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
**Exhibit 13**

 

191 Post Road West

Westport, CT 06880

Tel.                 203221 2770

Fax:                203221 2770

 

April 15th, 2005

 

Dear Tesoro Shareholder:

 

Our Board of Directors and I take great pleasure in inviting you, ourStockholder, to attend our 2005 Annual Stockholders Meeting.  This year the meeting will be held onSaturday, May 7th, at the Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress, Orlando, Florida,from 10:00 AM to 12:00 noon.

 

Enclosed you will find a copy of our December 31, 2004 AnnualStatement filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on April 14,2005 and our Information Statement relating to electing our Board and ratifyingour independent auditor to serve as such.

 

As you will note, Tesoro and its subsidiaries accomplished a number ofmilestones during 2004 including:

 

•                  Sales reached arecord $44.9 million;

•                  Opened warehousefacilities in Dallas, Texas, and Irvine, California;

•                  Completed theimplementation of our distribution channel expansion strategy, giving thecompany national reach and access to new customers;

•                  Signed a newlease for 300,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space in Palm City, Florida, whichconsolidates our existing warehouse space and increases our capacity by 75,000square feet.

 

At the meeting, we will review the company’s performance and answer anyquestions you may have.  Management willdiscuss the state of the company, our industry and the opportunities we see forthe future.

 

On behalf of the entire management team, we look forward to seeing youon May 7th.

 

Sincerely,

 
| /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr.        |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| Henry J. Boucher, Jr.            |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. |

 

----
(9 Misc. Rep. 273.)

#### KINKADE v. ATLANTIC AVE. R. CO.

(City Court of Brooklyn, General Term.

June 25, 1894.)

Street Oars—Injury to Passenger— Sudden Start.

It is negligence to suddenly and without warning start a street car while a passenger is on the step, and before he has had time to get his seat in the car.

Appeal from trial term.

Action by Moses D. Kinkade against the Atlantic Avenue Eailroad Company for personal injuries. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before CLEMEYT, C. J., and OSBOEYE, J.

Morris & Whitehouse, for appellant.

Ayres & Walker, for respondent.

CLEMENT, C. J.

The counsel for the appellant in this case seeks reversal on only two grounds—First, that there was no proof of negligence on the part of the employes of the defendant; and, second, on the ground that the verdict for $10,000 was excessive. We

*748have carefully read the record in this case, and find no ground for-disturbing the result at the trial term. We will go further, and say that the appeal seems to us to be taken solely for delay. It was decided by this court in the case of Medler v. Railroad Co., 12 N. Y. Supp. 930, affirmed in court of appeals without opinion 126 N. Y. 669, 27 N. E. 854,’that it was negligence for the driver to suddenly start an open horse car when the passenger was on the step for the purpose of alighting therefrom. The converse of the rule would' seem equally true,—rthat it was a negligent' act to suddenly and without warning start when the passenger was on the step, and before he-had time to get his seat in the car. The defendant’s counsel, however, contend that plaintiff urns riding on the step for the reason that he could not find a seat. If so, the case is stronger against the company. If the plaintiff was forced to ride in a dangerous place. Then he was not guilty of contributory negligence in so doing, and the employes of the company were bound to exercise-greater care. Spooner v. Railroad Co., 54 N. Y. 230; Werle v. Railroad Co., 98 N. Y. 650. The verdict was not excessive within the principles laid down by this court in the case of Vail v. Railroad Co., 6 Misc. Rep. 20, 26 N. Y. Supp. 59. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURJTY

L]NITED STATES COAST GUARD

Address of Administrative Law Judge Docketing Center

ALJ Docketing Center

U.S. Custom House

40 South Gay Street, Room 414

Baltimore, MD 21202 - 4022

Email: alidockacenter i'rurs.mil

Phone: (410) 962-5100

Toll Free: (866) 612.-7 s24 [6 I A-SKCG]

F ax: (4r0) 962-17 46

Toll Free Fax: (877) 243-3453 [CGE-FILE]

COMPLAINANT:

L]NITED STATES CI)AST GUARD

RESPONDENT: John Thomas Coyle DOCKET NIIMBER 102-l -0 1 69

WITHDRAWAL FROMDOCKET CG ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY NI-IMBER

7622850

The Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding by filing a Complaint onMay 3,2023,

seeking an Outright Suspension ofRespondent's Merchant Mariner Credential.

On May 31, 2023, the Coast Guard filed a Notice of Withdrawal from docker as

The Coast Guard will be asr;essing a possible Letter of Waming in lieu of Suspension and

Revocation Proceedings.

The Coast Guard reserves tlre right to file a new Complaint in this mafter. This matter is removed

from the docket and closed without prejudice effective this date.

Done and Dated June 8,20i13, at

Baltimore, MD

1--arr,tz,rz, W. 1,1/er--

Lauren M. Meus

Hearing Docket Clerk

U.S. Coast Guard

By Direction of the Chief Administrative Law

Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Environmental Assessment for the Carrol Creek Fire Salvage and Restoration Project is available for review. The EA discusses alternatives considered for resource recovery and restoration for the Carrol Creek fire area, which burned in August 2000. Five alternatives are considered representing a range of treatment levels for the area. The preferred alternative (Alternative 2) includes a project-specific amendment to the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. This amendment replaces 175 acres of burned Designated Old Growth habitat with the best available adjacent habitat. The Carrol Creek area is about 11 air miles southeast of Joseph, Oregon. The Environmental Assessment is available upon request from the Wallowa Valley Ranger District, 88401 Highway 82, Enterprise, OR, 97828: and at the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest website at                         *www.fs.fed.us/​r6/​w-w.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, contact Paul Survis, Wallowa Valley Ranger District, 88401 Highway 82, Enterprise, OR, 97828, or phone 541-426-5681.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Dated: April 16, 2001.

Karyn L. Wood,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 01-10214 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3-110-11-M