alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PEOPLE ex rel. TAYLOR v. FORBES, Justice.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Certiorari by Frederick L. Taylor against Gerrit A. Forbes, justice.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Without determining whether, by certiorari, the proceedings are properly before this court, we have looked into the merits involved in the determination made at the Tompkins oyer and terminer, adjudging Taylor in contempt, and find no occasion to disturb the conclusion reached by that court We therefore dismiss the writ of certiorari.
Process for Filing a Judicial Conduct or Disability Complaint *

complainant files complaint (Rule 6)

circuit chief judge reviews complaint (Rule 11)

circuit chief judge issues order dismissing 

or concluding complaint (Rule 11(c)-(e))

circuit chief judge appoints 

special committee (Rule 11(f))

complainant or subject judge may petition 

for judicial council review (Rule 18)

judicial council considers 

special committee report and 

issues order (Rule 20)

complainant or subject judge may petition 

for review by Committee on Judicial 

Conduct and Disability only if one or more 

members of judicial council dissented from 

judicial council order (Rule 21(b)(1)(B))

complainant or subject judge may 

petition for review by Committee on 

Judicial Conduct and 

Disability (Rule 21(b)(1)(A))

judicial council issues order on 

petition for review (Rule 19)

special committee files report with 

judicial council (Rule 17)

*This document does not represent every possible outcome in the judicial conduct and disability complaint process. Please consult the Judicial 

Conduct and Disability Act and the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings for further guidance.
Exhibit 23(ii)
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference of the following two reports into American Oil & Gas Inc.’s (“American”)previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-121941 and No. 333-144057) and Registration Statements onForm S-3 (No. 333-128812, No. 333-120987 and No. 333-139648):
 • Our report datedMarch 14, 2008 on the consolidated financial statements of American as of December 31,2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and
 • Our report datedMarch 14, 2008 on American management’s effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2007,
which appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for American for the year ended December 31, 2007.
***/s/ HEIN**& ASSOCIATES LLP***
Denver, Colorado
#### In the Matter of Orlo Clark, Jr., Petitioner, v Gordon M. Ambach, as Commissioner of the New York State Education Department, et al., Respondents.

Mahoney, P. J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to Education Law § 6510-a [4]) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Education which suspended petitioner’s license to practice medicine in New York for three years, with the last two years stayed, and placed him on probation for two years.

Petitioner, a Doctor of Osteopathy, on March 26, 1984 entered into a consent stipulation with the Department of Health whereby he agreed that he had unlawfully prescribed, dispensed, distributed, administered and possessed controlled drugs from January 1980 through September 14, 1983. As a result, petitioner agreed to delete from his Federal registration the right to order Schedule II controlled substances and to pay a $2,500 fine. The Department of Health then forwarded the matter to its Office of Professional Medical Conduct.

Petitioner was charged with professional misconduct based upon his admissions in the consent stipulation. Petitioner admitted guilt and offered evidence concerning mitigating circumstances. The Regents Review Committee unanimously found petitioner guilty as charged and recommended that petitioner’s license be suspended for two years, but that such suspension be stayed for two years and petitioner placed on probation for two years. On December 19, 1986, respondent *915Board of Regents unanimously accepted the findings and recommendations of the Committee but decided to suspend petitioner’s license for three years, with two years stayed, and petitioner placed on probation for two years. On December 31, 1986, respondent Commissioner of Education issued an order effectuating the Board’s decision. Petitioner then commenced this proceeding in this court (Education Law § 6510-a [4]) seeking to set aside the Commissioner’s determination on the ground that the penalty imposed was excessive.

The issue herein is not whether the penalty recommended by the Committee was more appropriate, but whether the penalty imposed by the Board was " ' "so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness” ’ ” *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233, quoting *Matter of Stolz v Board of Regents,*4 AD2d 361, 364). Further, the Board was not bound by the recommendation of the Committee *(see, Matter of Meshel v Board of Regents,*110 AD2d 976, 977, *lv denied*65 NY2d 608), but was free to take a more serious view of the misconduct. The penalty imposed herein amounts to a one-year suspension of petitioner’s license to practice medicine along with a two-year probationary term. The facts admitted to by petitioner establish a pattern of violating regulations relating to controlled drugs for a period of over three years. It cannot be said that the penalty imposed was so disproportionate to such offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Emile J. Jordan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Emile J. Jordan
----------------------------------------
Emile J. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer



Dated May 20, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.2  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Sanofi (No. 333-165418, No. 333-157685, No. 333-149203, No. 333-145074, No. 333-139555, No.333-125490 and No. 333-121584) and the Registration Statement on Form F-3 and related Prospectus of Sanofi (No. 333-165472) of our reports dated March 6, 2013 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 20-F.  Neuilly-sur-Seine, France  March 6, 2013  PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit  Xavier Cauchois
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 08-22

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

O R D E R

Pursuant to Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules), the Court 

created a Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel) to consider accusations of 

professional misconduct coming before the Court. The Court's March 11, 2011, Resolution 

regarding the Standing Panel provides that "[e]ach August 1, the longest serving member of the 

Standing Panel will be removed automatically from the Standing Panel with regard to any new 

cases assigned to the Standing Panel." It further provides that "the Clerk shall designate as the 

next member of the Standing Panel the regular active judge with highest precedence among judges 

who have not yet been designated as a member of the Standing Panel, or . . . the regular active 

judge with the longest period of time since last service as a regular member of the Standing Panel."

Judge Toth is currently the longest serving member, and Judge Jaquith is the regular active 

judge with highest precedence among judges who have not yet been designated as a member of 

the Standing Panel. Accordingly, the current Standing Panel, comprised of Judges Toth, Falvey,

and Laurer will be reconstituted effective August 1, 2022, to be comprised of Judges Falvey, 

Laurer, and Jaquith.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective August 1, 2022, the Standing Panel consists of Judges Falvey, 

Laurer, and Jaquith.

DATED: August 1, 2022 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 12.2

Certification pursuant to Section 302 Sarbanes Oxley Act by the Chief Financial Officer of Telecom Italia Media S.p.A.

I, Paolo Serra, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A (the Report) for the period ending December 31, 2005, of Telecom Italia Media S.p.A

2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report.

|                                 |     |                 |                        
|-------------------------------- | --- | --------------- | -----------------------
|                                 |     |                 |                        
|                                 | By: | /s/ Paolo Serra
|                                 |     |                
|                                 |     | Name:           | Paolo Serra            
|                                 |     | Title:          | Chief Financial Officer
|Date: September 28,
        2006 |     |                 |                        

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

CHARLES MAYNARD COLONY AND 

PAUL MARKLEY, LATE, TRADING AS 

HAWKWING PARTNERSHIP

v.

DOBERMAN GROUP, INC., WALTER 

DOBOZYNSKI, CLARENCE KAUFFMAN, 

STEVEN CONN AND HENRY OBER 

PETITION OF: DOBERMAN GROUP, 

INC., WALTER DOBOZYNSKI, 

CLARENCE KAUFFMAN, STEVEN CONN 

AND HENRY OBER

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 305 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

BRUMBAUGH LUMBER CO., MIFFLIN 

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, & 

HARRIET CLARK
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6144 

To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 

with respect to lighting energy efficiency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 

Mr. BARTON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BURGESS, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and 

Conservation Act with respect to lighting energy efficiency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Use of Light 

5 Bulbs Act’’. 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6144 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIGHTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle B of title III of the En3 ergy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 

4 110–140) is repealed. 

5 (b) APPLICATION.—The Energy Policy and Con6 servation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.) shall be applied 

7 and administered as if subtitle B of title III of the Energy 

8 Independence and Security Act of 2007 (and the amend9 ments made by that subtitle) had not been enacted. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Hai Sheng Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA PRECISION
STEEL, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
17th
day of May, 2010.





/s/
      Hai Sheng ChenHai
      Sheng ChenChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00137-CV

Erica Renee RENDON,

Appellant

v.

CHAVEZ REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2024CV00613

Honorable Cesar Garcia, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 17, 2024

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by April 4, 2024. On May 1, 2024, this court sent a 

letter notifying appellant that no brief had been filed and requesting a response by May 11, 2024. 

No brief or response was filed. On June 3, 2024, we ordered appellant to file, no later than June 

13, 2024, her brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) her failure to timely file a 

brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. 

Our order cautioned appellant that if she failed to timely file a brief and the written response by 

June 13, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see 
04-24-00137-CV

- 2 -

also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court 

order). Appellant did not file a timely response to our June 3rd order. We dismiss this appeal for 

want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
China Packaging Technologies, Inc. - Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by
   newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.2  

Purchase Agreement 

(English Summary) 

Party A: Great Shengda as purchaser

Party B: Creo Prepress (Shanghai ) Co., Ltd. as supplier 

	Date of Signing 	April 12, 2009 
	  	
       

	Name of Products 	
      Image Output System 

	  	
       

	Total Contract Price 	
      RMB 1,880,000.00 

	  	
       

	Place of Delivery 	
      At the Purchaser’s site 

	  	
       

	Country of Origin & 	
      Kodak Graphic Communications Canada Company 

	Manufacturer 	
       

	Time of Delivery 	
      The Supplier will use best efforts to deliver within 60
      days after this Contract has taken effect and the Purchaser has advanced
      the payment pursuant to the Terms of Payment. 




	Terms of Payment 	  	
      The total Contract Price shall be payable in the
      following installments: 

	  	1. 	
      10% as deposit upon execution of this Contract 

		2. 	
      85% of contract price shall be paid by T/T before the
      Purchase in favour of the Supplier. 

		3. 	
      The balance 5% contract price shall be paid by T/T after
      the Purchaser signing the Completion of Installation within one week.
    

		4. 	
      If any payment is delayed, all incurred losses and costs,
      including interest and/or storage charge, shall be bome by the Purchaser.
      In addition, the Supplier may terminate this Contract or delay the time of
      shipment accordingly. 

		5. 	
      The Purchaser shall bear all bank and other charges
      incurred in performing its payment obligations to the Supplier. 

	  	  	
       

	Warranty 	1. 	
      The Supplier warrants that the Goods hereof shall be free
      from defects of material and workmanship and in all respects in accordance
      with the specifications stipulated in this Contract. The warranty period
      shall be 12 months, starting from the Completion of Installation but shall
      not exceed 14 months from the time of delivery ex-works. 

		2. 	
      During the Warranty Period, the Supplier shall, in its
      discretion, replace or repair and defective or non-conforming component of
      the Goods. 

		3. 	
      The foregoing Clauses 1 and 2 are the exclusive and only
      warranties with respect to the Goods. All other warranties, express,
      implied or statutory are excluded to the extent permissible by law.
  

	 	 	
       


	
      Dispute Resolution 
	
      All disputes arising from or in connection with this
      Contract or the execution thereof shall be settled friendly through
      negotiation. In case no payment can be reached through negotiation, such
      disputes may then be submitted to the court where the Supplier is located
      for resolution through litigation proceedings.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 588 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase penalties for 

employing illegal aliens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2009 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase 

penalties for employing illegal aliens. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘10k Run for the Bor5 der Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR EMPLOYING ILLEGAL 

7 ALIENS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274A(e)(4)(A) of the Im9 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(e)(4)(A)) 

10 is amended— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 588 IH

1 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘$250 and not 

2 more than $2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000 and not 

3 more than $80,000’’; 

4 (2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘$2,000 and not 

5 more than $5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$80,000 and not 

6 more than $200,000’’; and 

7 (3) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘$3,000 and not 

8 more than $10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$120,000 and 

9 not more than $1,600,000’’. 

10 (b) USE OF ADDITIONAL PENALTY FUNDS.—Not11 withstanding any other provision of law, of the additional 

12 amounts of fines paid under section 274A(e)(4)(A) of the 

13 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

14 1324a(e)(4)(A)) by one or more employers and that are 

15 attributable to the amendments made by subsection (a)— 

16 (1) if State or local law enforcement officials 

17 have provided material assistance in the investiga18 tion or prosecution of cases of such employers that 

19 resulted in such fines— 

20 (A) 80 percent shall be paid, in a manner 

21 specified by the Secretary of Homeland Secu22 rity, to the State or local State law enforcement 

23 agencies which employed such individuals; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 588 IH

1 (B) 20 percent shall be used by the Sec2 retary to cover costs of detention of illegal 

3 aliens; and 

4 (2) if paragraph (1) does not apply— 

5 (A) 80 percent shall be paid to States (and 

6 political subdivisions of States) under the State 

7 Criminal Alien Assistance Program under sec8 tion 241(i) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1251(i)) for 

9 purposes of reimbursing those States and polit10 ical subdivisions for costs of incarceration of 

11 undocumented criminal aliens; and 

12 (B) 20 percent shall be used by the Sec13 retary to cover costs of detention of illegal 

14 aliens in Federal facilities. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) shall apply to violations occurring on or 

17 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6180 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6180

 To amend the conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 
  to promote the conservation and improvement of the soil, water, and 
   wildlife resources of lands containing muck soils, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2010

Mr. Hall of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                    to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 
  to promote the conservation and improvement of the soil, water, and 
   wildlife resources of lands containing muck soils, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MUCK SOILS CONSERVATION.

    Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 is amended by inserting 
after section 1240R (16 U.S.C. 3839bb-5) the following new section:

``SEC. 1240S. CONSERVATION OF LAND CONTAINING MUCK SOILS.

    ``(a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
carry out a conservation program under which the Secretary makes 
payments to assist owners and operators of eligible land specified in 
subsection (b) to conserve and improve the soil, water, and wildlife 
resources of such land.
    ``(b) Eligible Land.--To be eligible for inclusion in the program 
established under this section, the land must--
            ``(1) be comprised of soil that qualifies as muck, as 
        determined by the Secretary;
            ``(2) be used for production of an agricultural crop;
            ``(3) have a spring cover crop planted in conjunction with 
        the primary agricultural crop referred to in paragraph (2);
            ``(4) have a winter crop planted; and
            ``(5) have ditch banks seeded with grass that is maintained 
        on a year-round basis.
    ``(c) Payment Amounts.--The Secretary may provide payments of not 
less than $300, but not more than $500, per acre per year under the 
program.
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the program $50,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 2011 and 2012.''.
                                 <all>
```