alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond P. Springer,
in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Raymond P.
      SpringerDate: 
      March 28, 2008
            Raymond
      P. Springer
              Secretary
      and Chief Financial Officer
Amendment No. 2 to the Zep Inc. Supplemental Deferred Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10(e) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO THE 
 ZEP INC. SUPPLEMENTAL DEFERRED SAVINGS PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT is made and executed by Zep Inc. (the “Company”) on this 8th day of January, 2010 to be effective as set forth herein. 
 WHEREAS, the Company adopted and maintains the Zep Inc. Supplemental Deferred Savings Plan, effective as of October 31, 2007 (the
“Plan”), as amended; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan with respect to the treatment of salary
that is earned during the final payroll periods of one year but paid according to normal payroll practices in the immediately following year; and 
 WHEREAS, The Treasury Regulations issued with respect to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, permit changes with respect to the treatment of final payroll periods but only
if such changes take effect at least 12 months after adoption; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 8.1 of the Plan authorizes the
Committee (or its designee) to amend the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the following respects, such
amendments to be effective as of 12 months from the date this Amendment is executed and enacted: 
 1. Definitions.
Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by revising the definition of “Compensation” to provide as follows: 
 “Compensation” means the annual cash compensation (salary plus bonuses whether under a Performance-Based Plan or other annual bonuses) paid by the Employer to the Participant for the Plan Year, provided that (i) a
bonus actually paid during a subsequent Plan year based upon performance during the preceding Plan Year shall be treated as Compensation for such preceding Plan Year and (ii) salary paid in January under the Employer’s normal payroll
practices for a payroll period that includes services performed in December of the immediately preceding year shall be treated as compensation earned during January. The Participant’s Compensation shall include amounts deferred by the
Participant to this Plan and any other deferred compensation plan of the Employer (whether or not qualified), and any salary reduction amounts contributed to a welfare plan. The term “Compensation” shall not include long-term incentive
payments, income from stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards or other stock awards, car allowances, non-cash remuneration, such as health benefits, life insurance, and other fringe
benefits, moving expenses, relocation allowances, and payments from this Plan or any other deferred compensation plan. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Plan Administrator of the Company has caused this Amendment to be
executed by its duly authorized officer, to be effective as set forth herein. 
  

			
	ZEP INC.
		
	By:	 	     /s/ Robert S. Collins

		 	    Robert P. Collins
		 	     Vice President and
     Chief Administrative Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Viryanet Ltd. (the
Company) of our independent auditors report dated February 17, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Viryanet Ltd. appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31,
2003.



|                  |  |                                 
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Tel-Aviv, Israel  |  | KOST, FORER GABBAY and KASIERER 
|September 8, 2004 |  | A Member of Ernst & Young Global
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 

27, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00829-CR

IN RE BRADLEY BARTON, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1206429-B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On September 10, 2012, relator Bradley Barton, an inmate confined in the 

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 

52. In the petition, relator complains that the respondent, the Honorable Shawna L. 

Reagin, presiding judge of the 176th District Court of Harris County, has not ruled on his 

motion to recuse her that he filed in connection with his post-conviction application for 

writ of habeas corpus. See Barton v. State, No. 14-10-01119-CR, 2011 WL 5846300 

(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 22, 2011, no pet.) (not designated for 
2

publication) (affirming relator’s murder conviction). Relator asks that we compel the 

respondent to either recuse herself or refer the motion to recuse to the presiding judge of 

the local administrative district. We deny the petition.

To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, a relator must show that he 

has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to 

compel is a ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. 

Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). Consideration of a motion that is properly filed and 

before the court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1987) (orig. proceeding). A relator must establish the trial court (1) had 

a legal duty to rule on the motion; (2) was asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed to 

do so. In re Keeter, 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, orig. proceeding); In 

re Villarreal, 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding) (relator 

must show that trial court received, was aware of, and was asked to rule on motion). 

Relator has not established that the motion to recuse the respondent was properly 

filed and that the trial court was asked to rule on it but failed to do so. It is relator’s 

burden to provide this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to relief. 

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 In connection with the Annual Report of Coventure International  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB/A for  the year ending July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”), John Hromyk, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge: 

      (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and 

      (2) The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and result of operations of the Company. 

 /s/ John Hromyk

John Hromyk   Chief Executive Officer/Chief  Financial Officer  November 12, 2004 

 [A signed original of this written statement required by Section  906 has been provided to Coventure International Inc. and will be retained by  Coventure International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission  or its staff upon request.] 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NOS. 02-04-458-CR

						        02-04-459-CR

						        02-04-460-CR

ELIZABETH ANNE ROHR	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF WISE COUNTY

	------------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 

	------------

	Elizabeth Anne Rohr appeals three convictions for cruelty to animals.  She has also filed a “Motion to Void Judgment and Dismiss With Prejudice.”  	In two cases, docket nos. 2-04-458-CR and 2-04-459-CR, the trial court revoked appellant’s deferred adjudication community supervision and adjudicated her guilty of two offenses committed on August 6, 2002.  In the third case, docket no. 2-04-460-CR, appellant was convicted of a June 4, 2004 offense pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. 

	An appeal from the trial court’s adjudication of an appellant’s deferred adjudication community supervision is limited to jurisdictional defects and post- adjudication matters unrelated to the appellant’s conviction.2  The trial court’s decision to adjudicate is not appealable.3  Therefore, appellant’s appeals in docket nos. 2-04-458-CR and 2-04-459-CR are limited to these matters.

	Further, because appellant and the State entered into a plea-bargain agreement in docket no. 2-04-460-CR, which the trial court followed, appellant may appeal only (1) matters raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial and (2) matters for which the trial court has granted permission to appeal.4 In this case, there were no written motions ruled on before trial, and the trial court certified that this is a plea-bargain case and that appellant may appeal only the court’s denial of her post-conviction motion to recuse.  Therefore, appellant’s appeal in docket no. 2-04-460-CR is limited to the trial court’s ruling on the motion to recuse.5

	Appellant’s brief on appeal does not contain any clear and concise arguments pertinent to the matters that she may appeal, nor does it contain appropriate citations to authorities or to the appellate record.6  As an appellate court, it is not our task to pore through the record in an attempt to verify an appellant’s claims.7  Because the right to appellate review in Texas extends only to complaints made in accordance with the rules of appellate procedure, appellant’s complaints are inadequately briefed and are not preserved for our review.8  Accordingly, we overrule appellant’s complaints on appeal, deny appellant’s motion, and affirm the trial court’s judgments.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:	CAYCE, C.J.; GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  February 23, 2006
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Ceragon Networks Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of our knowledge:

|1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: /s/ Ira Palti  
Ira PaltiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: /s/ Naftali Idan   
Naftali IdanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  April 1, 2009

A signed copy of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ceragon Networks Ltd. and will be
retained by Ceragon Networks Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



---

---
EXHIBIT
32.2







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ended January 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond P. Springer, in my
capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Raymond P.
      SpringerDate: 
      March
      30, 2009
            Raymond
      P. Springer
              Secretary
      and Chief Financial Officer
#### James Katsaros, Respondent, v Catherine Katsaros, Respondent. John Marshall, Nonparty Appellant.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the nonparty former attorney for the defendant Catherine Katsaros appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), dated March 29, 1988, as denied his motion for (1) a retaining lien on his client’s file in the matrimonial action, (2) an immediate hearing as to the value of the attorney’s lien, and (3) a temporary restraining order preventing the parties from transferring any interest they have in real and personal property pending the hearing and determination of the motion.

*540Ordered that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the words "the amounts of which shall be determined at the conclusion of this action” and substituting therefor the words "a hearing shall be held expeditiously to determine whether he withdrew or was discharged with or without cause and, if with cause, the value of the charging lien”; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the nonparty appellant is not entitled to a retaining lien. The defendant’s unrefuted allegations of indigency constitute such exigent circumstances as would make it inequitable for the appellant to retain the file *(see, Rosen v Rosen,*97 AD2d 837). The appellant is relegated to a charging lien.

In light of the allegation of the defendant in the matrimonial action to the effect that the appellant engaged in spurious, unnecessary and irrelevant motion practice, and further, that she discharged the appellant before he moved for leave to withdraw, a question is presented as to whether the appellant withdrew or was discharged with or without cause *(see, Marschke v Cross,*82 AD2d 944). Moreover, there is a question as to the value of the legal services rendered to the defendant in the matrimonial action. The appellant is entitled to an immediate hearing to determine these issues *(see, Rosen v Rosen, supra,*at 837).

Finally, the appellant failed to establish his right to a temporary restraining order *(see, McLaughlin, Piven, Vogel v Nolan & Co.,*114 AD2d 165), and this equitable relief was properly denied. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 6-06

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGES

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), and in order to meet the needs of the Court, recalleligible retired judges John J. Farley, III, and Donald L. Ivers, are recalled, each for a period of 90

days, in order to perform substantial service to the Court. The Court requires the service of these

recalled judges to assist in reviewing and deciding the unprecedented number of appeals now

pending before the Court. Any service beyond the 90-day period must be with the consent of the

recalled judge.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective September 5, 2006, John J. Farley, III, shall commence service

as a judge of the Court for a period of 90 days. It is further

ORDERED that, effective September 11, 2006, Donald L. Ivers shall commence service

as a judge of the Court for a period of 90 days. 

DATED: August 28, 2006 FOR THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION









<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of 30DC,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form
10-K/A for the period  ending June 30, 2013,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Theodore A. Greenberg,
Principal  Accounting  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 4, 2014

/s/ Theodore A. Greenberg
----------------------------------------------------------
Theodore A. Greenberg
Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/                  Baowen                  Ren                                 Baowen                  RenChief                  Executive Officer Dated:                  May                  3, 2007 |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Lance Fors, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Third Wave Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

1.   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
     December 31, 2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 12, 2004


                                          /s/ Lance Fors
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Lance Fors, Ph.D.
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Program for Qualifying Department of Defense (DoD) Brokers

AGENCY: Military Traffic Management Command, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Military Traffic Management Command (MTMC), as the Program 
Director for the Department of Defense (DoD), has reviewed comments 
received in response to the Federal Register Notice of December 18, 
2000 (Volume 65, Number 243) page 79084. We appreciate the comments of 
those responding and weighed them in our decision process. MTMC will 
reconsider expanding the role of brokers to allow their participation 
in DoD's Personal Property Program when proposal's within the Task 
Force Fix are implemented.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sylvia Walker, Headquarters, 
Military Traffic Management Command, Attn: MTPP-HQ, Room 10N67-51, 
Hoffman Building II, 200 Stovall Street, Alexandria, VA 22332-5000; 
Telephone (703) 428-2982, Telefax (703) 428-3388.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-10014 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M