alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 EOP Operating Limited Partnership
Statement of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands)
 For the six months endedJune 30, 2006Income before income taxes, allocation to minority interests, income from
investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and gain on sales of real estate
    
    $
    71,647Plus Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    447,619Capitalized interest
    
    
    7,040Loan amortization cost
    
    
    5,961Fixed charges
    
    
    460,620Plus amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    845Less contributed income of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
    
    
    (2,592
    )Less capitalized interest
    
    
    (7,040
    )Less minority interest in pretax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred
fixed charges
    
    
    (19,562
    )Total
    
    
    (28,349
    )Earnings
    
    $
    503,918Fixed charges
    
    $
    460,620Earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7575

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REUVEN TENAMEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR89-235-JFM)

Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reuven Tenamee, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Reuven Tenamee appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to compel production of grand jury testimony. We have

reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion, as Tenamee

demonstrated no particularized need for production. See Dennis v.

United States, 384 U.S. 855, 872 (1966). Accordingly, we affirm

the order of the district court. See United States v. Tenamee, No.

CR-89-235-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 99.5**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONI, Daryl Wilson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Hydrogenics Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annualreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: March 20, 2007       /s/ Daryl Wilson Daryl Wilson    President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's financial statements as of and for the nine months ended June 30,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,157,270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,292,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                   106,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,074,923
<PP&E>                                         695,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,537,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,121,391
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,259
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,309,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,537,971
<SALES>                                     25,785,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,785,217
<CGS>                                       19,679,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,679,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,331,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             278,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                495,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            495,435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   495,435
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 30, 2015

No. 04-14-00824-CV & 04-15-00006-CV

Robert TYSON, Carl and Kathy Taylor, Linda and Ron Tetrick, Jim and Nancy Wescott, and 

Paul and Ruthe Wilson,

Appellants

v.

Demar BOREN, Lorena Yates and Robert N. Freeman II,

Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. CV-13-0100356 & CV-13-0200356

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral 

argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the 

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on Wednesday, September 2, 2015, to the 

following panel: Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Karen Angelini, and Justice Jason 

Pulliam. All parties will be notified of the Court’s decision in this appeal in accordance with 

TEX. R. APP. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that 

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues 

presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) 

days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on July 30, 2015.

______________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this July 30, 2015.

______________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32(1)

                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                            of CNA Surety Corporation
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
          (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Surety Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

        - The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
        March 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.

Dated: May 2, 2005

/s/ John F. Welch
-------------------------------------
John F. Welch
President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, the undersigned officer of DND Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:




To
      my
      knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      April 16, 2007


BY:
                /s/
                    Douglas N. DixonDOUGLAS
                        N. DIXON
                      CHIEF
                          EXECUTIVE
                          OFFICER
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Financial Officer

I, Richard Wachter, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of FIRSTBINGO.COM INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 6th day of June, 2005.



| | /s/ Richard Wachter        
| | ---------------------------
| | Richard Wachter            
| | Principal Financial Officer
Committee on Codes of Conduct

The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, Chair

Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability

The Honorable Anthony J. Scirica, Chair

Public Hearing on Proposed Changes to Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges and

Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings

October 30, 2018

9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. 

(Lunch Break: 12:30 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.)1

Witness List2

− The Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of 

California 

− Charles Gardner Geyh, John F. Kimberling Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer 

School of Law

− Arthur D. Hellman, Professor of Law Emeritus, Distinguished Faculty Scholar, University of 

Pittsburgh School of Law 

− Renee Newman Knake, Joanne and Larry Doherty Chair in Legal Ethics & Professor of Law, 

University of Houston Law Center

− Carol A. Needham, Emanuel Myers Professor of Law, Saint Louis University School of Law

− The Honorable Julie A. Robinson, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court, District of Kansas

− Jaime Santos, Law Clerks for Workplace Accountability

− Kendall Turner, Law Clerks for Workplace Accountability

− Andy DeGuglielmo, Student, Yale Law School 

− Rita Gilles, Student, Yale Law School

− Lisa Hansmann, Student, Yale Law School

− Chandini Jha, Student, Yale Law School 

− Alyssa Peterson, Student, Yale Law School

 1 All times are approximate.

2 The order of witnesses is subject to change based on hearing logistics.
− Serena Walker, Student, Yale Law School

− Megan Yan, Student, Yale Law School

− Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., Judicial Discipline Reform

− Charles Fournier, JD, Type 1 Diabetes Defense Foundation

− Jan B. Hamilton, Public Witness 

− Paul Horvitz, Public Witness 

− John C. Love, Public Witness

− Cyrus Sanai, Public Witness
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

 

CERTIFICATION

 

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to

 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009of Hydrogenics Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”)and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Lawrence Davis, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, that:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                           |               |
|--------------------------------|--------------------|
|                           |               |
| By:                            | /s/ Lawrence Davis |   |
|                           |               |
| Name: Lawrence Davis           |               |
|                           |               |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |               |
|                                |                    |  |

 

Date: March 26, 2010

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will beretained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 10-17

IN RE: COURT CLOSURE ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2017.

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will 

be closed on Friday, November 24, 2017.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice 

and Procedure, Friday, November 24, 2017, will be considered a day when the Court is closed. 

See U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: October 12, 2017 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
JMK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0511

IN THE MATTER OF:

S.E.,

Respondent and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for an extension of time, and good 

cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including 

March 28, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 24 2022

02/24/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0511
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gregory Charles HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30972

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

Jennifer McDaniel Kleinpeter, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rebecca Louise Hudsmith, Esq., Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gregory Charles Howard, federal prisoner # 04073-095, appeals the district court’s grant of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence based on the amendments to the crack cocaine Guideline. Howard, through the Federal Public Defender, contends that the district court abused its discretion by not granting a reduction to the middle of the recalculated guidelines range. He also contends that the district court committed procedural error or abused its discretion by failing to give reasons for the sentence.

As Howard concedes, his arguments are foreclosed by *United States v. Evans,*587 F.3d 667 (5th Cir.2009), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3462, 177 L.Ed.2d 1064 (2010). In *Evans,*we noted that, because the district court was under no obligation to reduce the defendant’s sentence at all, it was under no obligation to reduce the sentence even further within *431the recalculated range. *Id.*at 673. In addition, the district court was not required to give reasons for granting the defendant’s § 3582(c)(2) motion but not imposing a lower sentence within the recalculated guidelines range. *Id.*at 674. Accordingly, Howard’s contentions are foreclosed by *Evans,*and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. *See id.*at 672-74.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit
23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-102460, 333-100215,
333-56430, 333-105863, 333-113152 and 333-122471) of Alamosa Holdings,
Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2005 relating to the consolidated
financial statements, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which
appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated March 2, 2005 relating to the financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPDallas,
TexasMarch 2, 2005

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GST
FUNDING'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         306,569
<SECURITIES>                                33,271,808
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,578,377
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             265,481,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,974,129
<BONDS>                                    265,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,491,463)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               265,481,655
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,188,988
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,022,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (833,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (833,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (833,671)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>