alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsALJ Decisions 2018

**ALJ Decisions: 2018**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Russell E. LAMBERT, Petitioner, v. FRANK ARNOLD CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents.

No. 10-2150.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 29, 2011.

Decided: May 5, 2011.

*255Russell E. Lambert, Petitioner Pro Se. Paul Edwin Frampton, Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff & Love, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Sarah Marie Hurley, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Russell E. Lambert seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *Lambert v. Frank Arnold, Contractors,*Inc., No. 09-0658-BLA (B.R.B. May 14 & Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 08-14

IN RE: COMMITTEE ON ADMISSIONS AND PRACTICE

O R D E R

It is ORDERED, that Kenneth A. Walsh, Esq., is reappointed, effective November 19, 2014,

as Chair of the Committee on Admission and Practice for a three year term expiring on November 19,

2017, under Rules 2(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice. 

DATED: December 1, 2014 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
. 

I OFFICE OF THE AI-T’ORNEY GENERAL OF TfiXAS 

AUSTIN 

‘\‘, 

GROVER SCLLERS * 

*.q-o”*c* GSkIKL 

Bononblo R. V. Raflord 

County Auditor, Ruak COuntl 

Benduuon, Tou8 

Dur Btrr opltllon ROr 0-6070 

80: Whethu tho Coularlonorr' 

Oourt of Burk Cot&r oaa 

logally pay for l dror~imlng 

tho war Bon4 DrlTw ln Mid 

Q0-v. 

Tour lotter of Juno 5, 19Ur nqurst~ the.opinlon of 

t&l@ do p utnl ooatt o uttln tho rboto u rtmtod rutter,lr, lp put, 

a0 follousr 

*P lo a l u dr lu M uhothu or ttot.tho Wdmdoaorm~ 

%%nbrlto &ii Rurk Coaatt. 

dor an rtatute, l UI pat for~rdwtlrln(tho 

Wo hato 8ado 8 oaroful l ouoh of tho at&atom and hwo 

SalloU to find rsj @tat&o l uthorlJn(: thr Comlrolollon' Court 

to l xpottd ooaatj fun48 for the l boto meatlord pmpou, 

The oourtr ot thlm Btato hrto npo&kl~ hold that oountt 

oomlrrluaua* oourta my l xuol~o w ruoh iuthorltt aa lr ooafgz$.4!.b~hy~ltutloa aad rtatutor of thl? Stata, or neoo*aull~ 

In .tbo l k o no 0 o f o ttf l x p r .u or .l& pl lltthed o r lt~ l u* 

th o r lw thr oounty e'8~laamr8' ooart to nko thi l 

for rdtwtlBlng l War Bond Drlvo, uo ore l onstrolaod to r l%Z 

tho Caml~olOaora* aourt or Punk Coung haa no logal l ahorlt~ to 

oxpond oounty runti for moh purporo, notrl$h~tandlng tho faot that 

tho doaln on tha part of moh oourt to mako l uoh l rpondlturr, la 

8 oomuendablo one. _ 

Toururur truly 

APPROVED: Jutm l2.1944 

f 

a) Wo. P. Blaokbum 

Aot*) Am OEBWRALO?TZXA8 

AWtwPtBg i 

3 

A- @maRAL OF TEXAS 

By (I) Ardoll Warn 

Assistsnt 

APPRmt 

oplnlon eomltt.0 

br ~(I) B.W.B. 

ah~lrrrtt :
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

800 

CAF 14-00689 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF DELSENIOR STRACHAN, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LINDA GILLIAM, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

SARA E. ROOK, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ROCHESTER.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Patricia

E. Gallaher, J.), entered March 28, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition for a

modification of an order of visitation. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Strachan v Gilliam ([appeal No.

1] ___ AD3d ___ [June 19, 2015]). 

Entered: June 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
II 

Calendar No. 667 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6118 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 1, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, in Washington, 

D.C., as the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DOROTHY I. HEIGHT POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, 

6 in Washington, D.C., shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6118 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height 

5 Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 667 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6118 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostHeight Post Office’’. NE, in Washington, D.C., as the ‘‘Dorothy I. al Service located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, 

DECEMBER 1, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gary H. Schlatter certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OraLabs Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Acts Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated May 20, 2004                          /s/ Gary H. Schlatter
                                            President
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-125167 and No. 333-127102 on FormS-8 of our reports dated March 5, 2007, (which reports expressed an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,*Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and other Postretirement Plan,*as of December 31, 2006) relating to the financial statements of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Des Moines, Iowa 

March 5, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-993]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Parts 250 and 310


Notice of Intent to Request Public Comments on Guides for the 
Household Furniture Industry and the Telemarketing Sales Rule

AGENCY:  Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION:  Notice of intent to request public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  As part of its ongoing systematic review of all Federal Trade 
Commission (``Commission'') rules and guides, the Commission gives 
notice that it intends to request public comments on the Guides for the 
Household Furniture Industry and the Telemarketing Sales Rule during 
2000. The Commission will request comments on, among other things, the 
economic impact of, and the continuing need for, the rule and guides; 
possible conflict between the rule and guides and state, local, or 
other federal laws or regulations; and the effect on the rule and 
guides of any technological, economic, or other industry changes. No 
Commission determination on the need for or the substance of the rule 
or guides should be inferred from the intent to publish requests for 
comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Further details may be obtained from 
the contact person listed for each particular item.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission intends to initiate a review 
of and solicit public comments on the following during 2000:
    (1) Guides for the Household Furniture Industry, 16 CFR part 250.
    Agency Contact: Ingrid E. Whittaker-Ware, Federal Trade Commission, 
Southeast Region, Suite 5M35, Midrise Building, 60 Forsyth Street, 
S.W., Atlanta, GA 30303, (404) 6561364.
    (2) Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 CFR Part 310.
    Agency Contact: Catherine C. Harrington-McBride, Federal Trade 
Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Division of Marketing 
Practices, Room H238, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20580, 
(202) 326-2452.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 41-58.

    By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-993 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.25


 


Prof. Dr. med. Oliver Wiedow, Forstweg
55, D-24105 Kiel, Germany


 


Kiel, on November
12, 2019


Proteo, Inc.


Att:     Chief Executive Officer


Mr. Oliver Wiedow


2102 Business Center Drive


Irvine, CA 92612


USA


 



	Re: 	Elafin License Agreement 


 


This is to confirm certain agreements and
understandings reached between me and Proteo, Inc. in November 2019 based on the following background:


 


Pursuant to the provisions of the license
agreement between Proteo, Inc. (hereinafter “Licensee“) and myself (hereinafter “Licensor“; Licensee and
Licensor collectively the “Parties”) dated December 30th, 2000 as amended on December 23rd, 2008
(hereinafter the “License Agreement“), Licensee promised to pay an aggregate amount of 660,000 Euros in certain installments
to Licensor. In December 2007, December 2008 and February 2012, Licensee paid to Licensor 30,000 Euros per year and no other payments
were made under the License Agreement to Licensor as of June 10th, 2014. In December 2012, Licensor agreed in writing
to waive the non-payment defaults and agreed to defer the due dates of the payments for the outstanding balance of 570,000 Euros
with installments due on April 15, 2015 (330,000 €), on December 31, 2015 (120,000 €) and on December 31, 2016 (120,000
€). In June 2014, Dr. Wiedow agreed in writing to defer the due date of the payments for the outstanding balance of 570,000
Euros to April 2018, and in March 2017, Dr. Wiedow agreed to defer the payment to June 30, 2020, and in June 2019, Dr. Wiedow agreed
to defer the payment to November 15, 2020.


 


I herewith confirm that based on the foregoing
we have agreed on the following in November 2019:


 


	 	1. 	The Parties herewith agree that Licensor defers to November 15, 2021 the total amount of 570,000 Euros payable by Licensee, which otherwise would be due on November 15, 2020 (hereinafter the “Deferral”). 


 


	 	2. 	In the event that the Company's financial condition improves, the Parties would endeavor to enter in good faith negotiations to accelerate the payments. 


 


	 	3. 	Neither the Deferral under Section 1 hereof nor the willingness to negotiate accelerated payments as provided for in Section 2 hereof, would constitute a waiver of or estoppel to Licensor ‘s rights to already existing or future payment obligations under the License Agreement. 


 


Please confirm by respective countersignature
that you are in agreement with this letter and with this confirmation of our agreement from November 2019.


 


Kind regards,


 


/s/ Oliver Wiedow        



Prof. Dr. Oliver Wiedow


 


 


We agree to the foregoing


 


Proteo, Inc., on November 12, 2019


 


/s/ Oliver Wiedow 


Prof. Dr. Oliver Wiedow, Chief Executive
Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Charles A. Jett, Jr., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emageon Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 30, 2006 /s/ Charles A. Jett, Jr.Charles A. Jett, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)