alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Interim Rule 1020. Chapter 11 Reorganization Case for 

2 Small Business Debtors or Debtors Under Subchapter V

3 (a) SMALL BUSINESS DEBTOR 

4 DESIGNATION. In a voluntary chapter 11 case, the debtor 

5 shall state in the petition whether the debtor is a small 

6 business debtor or a debtor as defined in § 1182(1) of the 

7 Code and, if the latter so, whether the debtor elects to have 

8 subchapter V of chapter 11 apply. In an involuntary chapter 

9 11 case, the debtor shall file within 14 days after entry of the 

10 order for relief a statement as to whether the debtor is a small 

11 business debtor or a debtor as defined in § 1182(1) of the 

12 Code and, if the latter so, whether the debtor elects to have 

13 subchapter V of chapter 11 apply. The status of the case as 

14 a small business case or a case under subchapter V of chapter 

15 11 shall be in accordance with the debtor’s statement under 

16 this subdivision, unless and until the court enters an order 

17 finding that the debtor’s statement is incorrect.

18 (b) OBJECTING TO DESIGNATION. The United 

19 States trustee or a party in interest may file an objection to 

20 the debtor’s statement under subdivision (a) no later than 30 

21 days after the conclusion of the meeting of creditors held

22 under § 341(a) of the Code, or within 30 days after any 

23 amendment to the statement, whichever is later.
24 (c) PROCEDURE FOR OBJECTION OR 

25 DETERMINATION. Any objection or request for a 

26 determination under this rule shall be governed by Rule 9014 

27 and served on: the debtor; the debtor’s attorney; the United 

28 States trustee; the trustee; the creditors included on the list 

29 filed under Rule 1007(d) or, if a committee has been

30 appointed under § 1102(a)(3), the committee or its 

31 authorized agent; and any other entity as the court directs.

Committee Note

The Interim Rule is amended in response to the 

enactment of the Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and 

Technical Correction Act (the “BTATC Act”), Pub. L. No. 

117-151, ___ Stat. ____. The BTATC reinstates the 

definition of “debtor” for determining eligibility to proceed 

under subchapter V of chapter 11 that was in effect from 

March 27, 2020 through March 27, 2022, under the 

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, Pub. 

L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281, as amended. Subdivision (a) 

of the rule is amended to reflect that change. This Interim 

Rule will terminate two years after the date of enactment of 

the BTATC, unless the Act is extended.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

Misc. No. 14-04 

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPUNE 

ORDER 

Pursuant to Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules), the Court 

created a Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel) to consider disciplinary 

cases coming before the Court. The Court's March 11, 2011, Resolution, regarding the Standing 

Panel provides that on "[ e ]ach August 1, the longest serving member of the Standing Panel will be 

removed automatically from the Standing Panel with regard to any new cases assigned to the 

Standing Panel." It further provides that " ... the Clerk shall designate as the next member of the 

Standing Panel the regular active judge with highest precedence among judges who have not yet 

been designated as a member of the Standing Panel ... " 

Judge Moorman is currently the longest serving member, and Judge Greenberg is the regular 

active judge with highest precedence among judges who have not yet been designated as a member 

of the Standing Panel. Accordingly, the current Standing Panel, comprised of Judges Moorman, 

Pietsch, and Bartley will be reconstituted effective August 1, 2014 to comprise Judges Pietsch, 

Bartley, and Greenberg. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that, effective August 1, 2014, the Standing Panel will consist of Judges Pietsch, 

Bartley, and Greenberg. 

DATED: July 21, 2014 FOR THE COURT:
Exhibit 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-159211, 333-149281, 333-141660, 333-133332, 333-112728, 333-109809, 333-102509 and
333-66758) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-140268 and 333-143989) of PDF Solutions, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2010
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San
Jose, California
March 16, 2010

---
**32.1           	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

	In connection with the Annual Report of Shallbetter Industries, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Y. Chow, Chairman andCEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

By:/S/ ANTHONY C.Y. CHOW Anthony C. Y. Chow, Chairman and CEO

	Date: February 3,  2005
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20973-20974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1517-001]


Florida Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

April 20, 2001.
    Take notice that on April 10, 2001, Florida Power & Light Company 
(FPL) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission), amendments to its proposed service agreements with AXIA 
Energy LP for Non-Firm transmission service and Firm transmission 
service under FPL's Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    FPL requests that the proposed service agreements become effective 
on March 16, 2001.
    FPL states that this filing is in accordance with Section 35 of the 
Commission's regulations.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice

[[Page 20974]]

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10330 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC NO. 2-05

IN RE: RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Before IVERS, Chief Judge, and STEINBERG, GREENE, KASOLD, HAGEL,

MOORMAN, LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Pursuant to Rule 40(b) and (c)(1) of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, it is

ORDERED that Ronald L. Smith, Esq., of Washington, D.C., a member of the Court's bar, is

appointed to the Committee for a term ending April 27, 2007.

DATED: April 27, 2005 BY THE COURT:

DONALD L. IVERS

Chief Judge
#### DALEY v. PORT JERVIS, M. & N. Y. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department

July 14, 1894.)

Carriers—Injuries to Passengers Entering Car.

Where a person, while entering defendant’s railroad car, which was standing at its customary place to receive passengers, was injured by the sudden jerking of the car, the question of defendant’s negligence was properly submitted to the jury.

Appeal from circuit court, Sullivan county.

Action by James Daley, as administrator of William H. Daley, deceased, against the Port Jervis, Monticello & New York Railroad Company. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before MAYHAM, P. J., and PUTNAM and HERRICK, JJ.

Howell, Parshall & Schofield (Wm. A. Parshall, of counsel), for appellant.

John W. Lyon, for respondent.

HERRICK, J.

The plaintiff, with his wife and infant child, went to the depot of the defendant, and purchased a ticket for his wife, shortly before 6 o’clock in the evening, the train which they were to take being scheduled to start at 6 o’clock. After purchasing the ticket, they proceeded to the platform, and there found a car standing with doors open, apparently ready to receive passengers. -He and his wife were both accustomed to riding upon the train in question. It was about the time that it was scheduled to start, and the car stood at the usual place. Other passengers were there, taking the car. The wife entered the car; following her was another lady, not a member of plaintiff’s party; then came the plaintiff, with a basket and his infant child; he lifted the child upon the platform of the car, and started to get upon it himself, when the car was jerked forward, and the child thrown off, sustaining injuries from which it died. It seems to me that the defendant was clearly guilty of negligence, for, the car being in its accustomed position at the platform, open, apparently ready to receive passengers, it was an invitation to the plaintiff to board the train. The judgment should be affirmed. There is no special principle of law involved which calls for an opinion; the facts are such as to clearly require a submission to a jury, and their finding should not be disturbed. All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

11:00 a.m., Friday, May 11, 2001.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-10075  Filed 4-19-01; 11:23 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PDF Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Keith A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |                                                                                                                    
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ KEITH A. JONES Keith A. Jones Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)

Date:
March 16, 2009

---



QuickLinks
**Michigan Supreme Court** 

**Lansing, Michigan**

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 31, 2014 

# Order

March 31, 2014

148373 ( 62 )

NAUM THOMAI and ZHULIETA THOMAI

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ees

,

v

MIBA HIDRAMECHANICA CORPORATION

and CORPORATIONS X AND Y,

Defendant s

- Appell ants. SC: 148373

COA: 310755

Macomb CC: 2011

- 001947

- NO

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Self

- Insurers’

Association to participate as amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on

March 31, 2014, by the Michigan Self

- Insurers’ Association on the application for leave

to appeal is accepted for filing.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 15-07

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN,

LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules) provides for referring cases

under those Rules to a standing panel if the Court decides to establish such a panel on a rotating or

permanent basis. The Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel) was created on

January 27, 2005, by Miscellaneous Order No. 01-05, to consider disciplinary cases coming before

the Court. Pursuant to a December 23, 2004, Resolution of the Board of Judges, on August 1 of

each succeeding year, the membership of the panel shall be redesignated so that "the senior judge

of the Standing Panel will be replaced by the judge who is immediately junior to the junior judge

then on the Standing Panel." 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective immediately, the Standing Panel will consist of Judges Hagel,

Moorman, and Lance.

DATED: August 13, 2007 BY THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Brian M. Akerstrom Attorney General/Dep't of Public Safety/Carson City Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
Exhibit 8



List of Subsidiaries of Metal Storm Limited



|                   |  |                  |  |                          
|------------------ |  | ---------------- |  | -------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary |  | Percentage Owned |  | Jurisdiction of Formation
|Metal Storm Inc.   |  | 100%*            |  | Delaware                 
|ProCam Machine LLC |  | 100%             |  | Washington               

---

|* | Metal Storm Limited directly owns 49% of Metal Storm Inc. and officers of Metal Storm Limited who are U.S. citizens own the remaining 51% of the company through a trust.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Graham, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered October 30, 1985, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Judgment affirmed *(see, People v Crawley,*130 AD2d 879). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2626 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2626

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit Indian tribal 
           governments to be shareholders of S corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2015

  Mr. Lucas (for himself and Mr. Cole) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit Indian tribal 
           governments to be shareholders of S corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS PERMITTED TO BE SHAREHOLDERS OF S 
              CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1361(b)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``or an organization described in 
subsection (c)(6)'' and inserting ``an organization described in 
subsection (c)(6), or an Indian tribal government (as defined in 
section 7701(a)(40) and including any subdivision of such government 
and any agency or instrumentality of such government or subdivision)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0135

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

A.M.M.R. and M.L.R.M.R.,

 Youths in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

Counsel for Appellant Father has filed a motion for a 45-day extension of time 

within which to file his opening brief. Counsel has also filed a separate motion to 

consolidate DA 21-0135, In the Matter of A.M.R.R., A Youth in Need of Care, and 

DA 21-0136, Matter of M.L.R.M.R., A Youth in Need of Care.

The Court notes that these two matters, along with DA 21-0106, Matter of 

M.L.R.M.R., A Youth in Need of Care, were consolidated into one case, DA 21-0135, 

Matter of A.M.M.R. and M.L.R.M.R., Youths in Need of Care, on June 25, 2021. Therefore, 

the motion to consolidate is moot.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion is for extension of time is GRANTED. 

Appellants Father’s opening brief shall be filed on or before September 2, 2021. 

No further extensions will be granted. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 7 2021

07/07/2021
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS




In
connection with this report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology, Inc. on
Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jing’an Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Date:
January 20, 2009





By: /s/ Jing’an
Wang


Jing’an
Wang,


Chief
Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Quantum Group, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I, Noel
J. Guillama, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and, I, Donald B. Cohen,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


         THE QUANTUM GROUP, INC.
         Registrant

Date:  February 13, 2004

          /s/ Noel J. Guillama
         -----------------------
         Noel J. Guillama
         President, Director and
         Chief Executive Officer


         THE QUANTUM GROUP, INC.
         Registrant

Date:  February 13, 2004

         /s/ Donald B. Cohen
         -----------------------------
         Donald B. Cohen
         Vice-President, Director and
         Chief Financial Officer
# When to File Your Petition to Remove Conditions

A conditional permanent resident receives a Green Card valid for two years. To remove the conditions on your permanent resident status, you must file a petition before your conditional Green Card expires.
                -  To remove the conditions on a Green Card based on marriage, you must file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence. 
                - To remove conditions on a Green Card for entrepreneurs, you must file  Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status . 

If we granted you conditional permanent resident status through marriage to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, use Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence, to file for the removal of those conditions.

If you do not apply to remove the conditions in time, you could lose your conditional permanent resident status and potentially be removed from the country.

If we granted you conditional permanent resident status based on investment, you must file Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status, within the 90-day period before your Green Card expires.

If you do not file Form I-829 as required, you will automatically lose your conditional permanent resident status as of the second anniversary of the date you were granted conditional status. As a result, you will become removable from the United States.

To use the date calculator, check your permanent resident card to locate the date when the card expires, which can be found under the label **Card Expires**. 

For example, using the expiration date shown on the card on the right, you would type **06 30 2023**, into the appropriate cells of the calculator, as shown below:

**The earliest date you may file your petition to remove conditions is:**

 04/01/2023

If you are required to file within 90 days of your conditional status expiring, you may use this calculator to ensure you submit your petition within the 90-day window.

**Conditional Residence Expiration Date:**

The earliest date you may file your petition to remove conditions is:

If you are required to file within 90 days of your conditional status expiring, and USCIS receives your petition *before* this date, your petition may be rejected and returned to you for filing too early.

If you file your Petition to Remove Conditions late, you must include with your petition:
                    - A request to excuse your late filing; and
                    - A written explanation showing your failure to file on time was for good cause and due to extenuating circumstances.

We will determine whether there was good cause for the failure to file your petition within the required time period.

09/14/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.