alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 19, 2014

No. 04-14-00586-CR

David Reza CANTU,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR8900

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal 

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk 

file the electronic clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the 

following documents:

1. All pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and 

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post-judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk 

of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court 

clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
AND CCC SURETY OPERATIONS EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
AND SCHEDULES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>       1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0 
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 264,287
<CASH>                                           3,589
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               8,366
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          69,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 685,872
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                122,281
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            164,603
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0 
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                105,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           433
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   685,872
<PREMIUMS>                                     108,564
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                  0
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                    (11,516)
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     48,075
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            11,599
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6016 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To provide for a GAO investigation and audit of the operations of the fund created by BP to compensate persons 

affected by the Gulf oil spill. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6016 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Audit the BP Fund 

3 Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INVESTIGATION AND AUDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General shall 

6 conduct an ongoing independent investigation and audit 

7 of the operations of the fund and claims process created 

8 by BP to compensate persons affected by the BP Deep9 water Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico beginning 

10 on April 20, 2010, as those operations take place to deter11 mine their effectiveness, including the timeliness of claim 

12 payments and the accuracy of those operations in deter13 mining amounts of damages compensated. 

14 (b) USE OF SUBPOENA POWER.—The Comptroller 

15 General may use any investigative powers, including those 

16 of subpoena granted to the Comptroller General for the 

17 purposes of other investigations and audits, to conduct 

18 this investigation and audit. 

19 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Every 90 days during 

20 the operations, and once after all those operations are 

21 completed, the Comptroller General shall report to Con22 gress on the effectiveness of those operations. 

23 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

24 It is the sense of Congress that— 

25 (1) BP should fully cooperate with the Comp26 troller General to assure that the BP relief fund is 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6016 RFS

1 accurately, expediently, and efficiently compensating 

2 Gulf coast victims of the BP Deepwater Horizon oil 

3 spill for their losses; and 

4 (2) the costs incurred by the Comptroller Gen5 eral to carry out responsibilities under this Act 

6 should be reimbursed by BP. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# AAO Decision Data

This page contains a link to relevant statistics on AAO decisions. The statistics are organized by the USCIS form number associated with the underlying benefit category. The process in which USCIS reviews and adjudicates immigration benefits and any subsequent appeals is outlined below:
                - Initial immigration benefit adjudication . Eligible applicants and petitioners generally receive approvals when USCIS initially adjudicates their applications and therefore do not need to appeal an unfavorable decision. For disposition data on initial field adjudications, visit the  USCIS Immigration and Citizenship Data page , which contains a quarterly All Forms Report.
                - Initial field review of appeals . When USCIS denies a benefit request and an applicant files an appeal, the USCIS office that denied the benefit will first review the appeal and determine whether to take favorable action and grant the benefit request. This process is called “initial field review.” If that office does not take favorable action, it will forward the appeal to the AAO for appellate review. While specific data are not currently available, a significant number of appeals are favorably resolved during initial field review.
                - AAO appeal decisions . When adjudicating an appeal on the merits, the AAO generally sustains (approves), dismisses (denies), or remands (returns) the appeal. For appeal disposition data on benefit categories that are commonly appealed to the AAO, visit the  AAO appeal statistics page (PDF, 527.18 KB) .

10/23/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Friendly Energy Exhibit 10.04 - Promissory Note


Exhibit 10.04







PROMISSORY NOTE




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Friendly Energy Exploration at 502 North Division Street, Carson City, NV 89703 (the Borrower) promises to pay to order of Douglas B. Tallant located at Carson City, NV (the Lender) the principal sum of $35,000, together with interest of 8% per annum from April 1, 2010, all due and payable in one year from the date of this Note.




Borrower shall have the right to repay the principal balance of this Note in whole or in part at any time during the term of this Note without penalty or premium upon the remittance to Lender of all amounts due hereunder.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has caused this Note to be executed by Friendly Energy Exploration on this date of March 31, 2010.




FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION




/s/ Donald Trapp____________

By Donald L. Trapp, 

Chief Financial Officer
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10578 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. JAM ES K EN N ET H O W EN S D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 7 : 0 6
- CR- 1 2
- ALL
B e fo r e H IG G IN B O T H A M , D E N N IS , a n dP R A D O , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney ap poi n t ed t o represent Jam es K en n et h O w en s ha s m oved f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S
. 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ). O w e n s h a s file d a r e s p o n s e . T h e r e c o r d is in s u f f i c ie n tly deve l ope d t o al l ow c ons i der at i on at t hi s t i m e of O w ens ’ s c l ai m s of i nef fec t ive as si st ance of

c ounse l ; s uch c l ai m s gener al l y “ c annotbe r es olved on di r ec tappeal w h en [th eyh a ve ] n ot be en raised be fore th e d i stri ct co u rt sin ce n o op p ortu n i ty United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 10578

2 ex i sted to d ev elop th e record on the m erits of t h e a l l eg a ti on s. ” Uni t e d St at e s v. Can t w ell , 4 70 F. 3d1 08 7, 1 09 1 ( 5t h Ci r . 2 00 6) (i nt e r nalq uo t at i o n m ar ks a nd c i t a t i o n o m i t t e d )
. Ou r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d , c o u n s e l ’ s br i e f, a nd O w e ns ’ s r e s po ns e di s c l o s e s no no nf r ivo l o us i s s ue f

o ra ppe al
. A c c o r di ngly, t he m ot i on f

or l eave to w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r e s p o n s ib ilitie s h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R
. 42. 2.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of WealthCraft Systems Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated: September 15,2008                    By: /s/ Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
                                             Chief Executive Officer
Official Form 417A Notice of Appeal and Statement of Election page 1 

Official Form 417A (12/23)

[Caption as in Form 416A, 416B, or 416D, as appropriate]

NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION 

Part 1: Identify the appellant(s)

1. Name(s) of appellant(s):

_ _ _ 

2. Position of appellant(s) in the adversary proceeding or bankruptcy case that is the subject of this

appeal:

For appeals in an adversary proceeding.

 Plaintiff

 Defendant

 Other (describe) 

For appeals in a bankruptcy case and not in an

adversary proceeding.

 Debtor

 Creditor

 Trustee

 Other (describe) 

Part 2: Identify the subject of this appeal

1. Describe the judgment—or the appealable order or decree—from which the appeal is taken: 

_ 

2. State the date on which the judgment—or the appealable order or decree—was entered:

_ 

Part 3: Identify the other parties to the appeal

List the names of all parties to the judgment—or the appealable order or decree—from which the appeal is 

taken and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of their attorneys (attach additional pages if

necessary):

1. Party: _ __ Attorney: 

_ _ _ 

_ _ _ 

_ _ _ 

2. Party: _ __ Attorney: 

_ 

_ 
Official Form 417A Notice of Appeal and Statement of Election page 2

Part 4: Optional election to have appeal heard by District Court (applicable only in

certain districts)

If a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is available in this judicial district, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel will

hear this appeal unless, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(1), a party elects to have the appeal heard by the

United States District Court. If an appellant filing this notice wishes to have the appeal heard by the

United States District Court, check below. Do not check the box if the appellant wishes the Bankruptcy

Appellate Panel to hear the appeal.

 Appellant(s) elect to have the appeal heard by the United States District Court rather than by

the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

Part 5: Sign below

Date:

Signature of attorney for appellant(s) (or appellant(s)

if not represented by an attorney)

Name, address, and telephone number of attorney

(or appellant(s) if not represented by an attorney):

Fee waiver notice: If appellant is a child support creditor or its representative and appellant has filed the

form specified in § 304(g) of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994, no fee is required.

[Note to inmate filers: If you are an inmate filer in an institution and you seek the timing benefit of Fed.

R. Bankr. P. 8002(c)(1), complete Director’s Form 4170 (Declaration of Inmate Filing) and file that

declaration along with the Notice of Appeal.]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Raul Perez, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Wayne County Court, Parenti, J.—rape, first degree, and burglary, second degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7716** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ARTHUR WAYNE CLEMMER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distri ct of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8:05

- cr - 00277

- AW

- 1; 8:09

- cv - 03235

- AW )

Submitted : March 3, 2011 Decided: April 15, 2011

Before KING and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Arthur Wayne Clemmer, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ar thur Wayne Clemmer seeks to appeal the district
court ’s orders denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010)

an d Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. *
When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period u nder Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court ’ s order denying Clemmer’s § 2255 motion was entered on the docket on July 29, 2010 and its order denying his timely Rule 59(e) motion was entered on the docket on August 18, 2010
. Clemmer asserts he placed his first notice

* Clemmer has filed a notice of appeal from a district court order purporting to deny his first notice of appeal as untimely. Because the district court is without the authority to deny an appeal, even if apparently untimely, w e treat this as an appeal solely from the orders denying Clemmer’s § 2255 and Rule 59(e) motions.3 of appeal in the prison’s internal mail ing system for mailing on November 3, 2010. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 , 276 (1988)
. Crediting this version of events, Clemmer’s first notice of appeal was nevertheless untimely by over two weeks.
Because Clemmer failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the dec isional process.
DISMISSE D
- How To Appeal 
    - Court Forms  and Fees        - Court Forms
      - Fee Schedule
      - Filing Fee 
    - Court Rules and Procedures        - Rules of Practice  and Procedure
      - Procedural Requirements for Staff Conferences
      - Internal Operating Procedures
      - Rules of Admission  and Practice
      - Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability
      - E-Filing Rules
      - Court Process
      - Court Efforts to Ensure Compliance with Court Rules 
    - Information About Practitioners        - Search List of Practitioners
      - Disciplinary Action
      - Key Points in Finding a Representative
      - Compendium of Disciplinary Grievances 
    - Orders and Opinions        - Miscellaneous Orders
      - Ceremonial Orders
      - Opinions and Full Court Orders
      - Search Decisions and Opinions
      - Recent Decisions / Opinions
      - Case Archives 
    - Active Panel Cases 
    - Stayed Cases 
    - Class Action Cases 
    - Electronic Filing 
    - Docket Search 
    - Oral Arguments        - Schedule
      - Oral Arguments via YouTube Live
      - Audio/Video
      - Oral Argument Educational Outreach 

Miscellaneous Orders
Ceremonial Orders
Opinions - Panel and Full Court
Search Decisions and Opinions
Recent Decisions / Opinions
Archived Single Judge and Panel Decisions
Back

USCAVC 16thJudicial ConferenceSeptember 19-20, 2024

Watch CAVC Oral Arguments on YouTube

Changes to Court Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability - EffectiveJanuary 10, 2024

In the News: Articles

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION







<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Infinity  Capital  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2007 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Theodore A. Greenberg,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Investment  Officer and
Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 15, 2008


Name: Theodore A. Greenberg

/s/Theodore A. Greenberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Secretary


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.