20694 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2001 / Notices

This notice is distributed by mail to

several hundred subscribers; if you no

longer wish to receive it, or would like

to be added to the distribution, please

contact the Office of the Secretary,

Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969).

In addition, distribution of this meeting

notice over the Internet system is

available. If you are interested in

receiving this Commission meeting

schedule electronically, please send an

electronic message to dkw@nrc.gov.

Dated: April 19, 2001.

David Louis Gamberoni,

Technical Coordinator, Office of the

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–10236 Filed 4–20–01; 11:50 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[NUREG–1671]

Standard Review Plan for the Gaseous

Diffusion Plants; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: Because of significant changes

to current draft U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) standard review

plan for the recertification of the

gaseous diffusion plants, NRC is offering

the opportunity for public review and

comment on the addition of an

introduction to the draft report NUREG–

1671 retitled, ‘‘Standard Review Plan for

the Gaseous Diffusion Plants.’’

DATES: Submit comments to the address

listed below by May 25, 2001.

Comments received after this date will

be considered if it is practical to do so,

but the Commission is able to ensure

consideration only for comments

received on or before this date.

ADDRESSES: Mail written comments to:

Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555–0001. Hand

deliver comments to the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission’s headquarters

building at One White Flint North,

11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

Maryland 20852, between 7:45 a.m. and

4:15 p.m. during Federal workdays.

Draft NUREG–1671, without the new

Introduction, is available for inspection

and copying for a fee at the NRC public

document room (PDR), that is currently

located at NRC’s headquarters building,

One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. A

copy of the draft Introduction may be

obtained from the NRC’s Internet

website, http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/

NUREGS/SR1671/REVISED/index.html

or from the Agency’s document

management system, called ADAMS,

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/

index.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill

Gleaves, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety

and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear

Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555. Telephone:

(301) 415–5848.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day

of March 2001.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

William C. Gleaves,

Mechanical Systems Engineer, Special

Projects Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety

and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material

Safety and Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 01–10093 Filed 4–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF

GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Votes To Close April 13, 2001,

Meeting

By telephone vote on April 13, 2001,

the Board of Governors of the United

States Postal Service voted unanimously

to close to public observation its

meeting held in Washington, DC via

teleconference. The Board determined

that prior public notice was not

possible.

ITEMS CONSIDERED:

1. Strategic Planning/Postal Reform.

2. Postal Rate Commission Opinion

and Recommended Decision on Further

Reconsideration in Docket No. R2000–1,

Omnibus Rate Case.

3. Personnel Matters.

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The

General Counsel of the United States

Postal Service has certified that the

meeting was properly closed under the

Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Requests for information about the

meeting should be addressed to the

Secretary of the Board, David G. Hunter,

at (202) 268–4800.

David G. Hunter,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–10265 Filed 4–20–01; 2:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710–12–M

POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF

GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Votes To Close May 1, 2001,

Meeting

At its meeting on April 13, 2001, the

Board of Governors of the United States

Postal Service voted unanimously to

close to public observation its meeting

scheduled for May 1, 2001, in

Washington, DC via teleconference.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Postal Rate Commission Opinion

and Recommended Decision on Further

Reconsideration in Docket No. R2000–1,

Omnibus Rate Case.

2. Strategic Planning/Postal Reform.

3. Personnel Matters.

PERSONS EXPECTED TO ATTEND:

Governors Ballard, Daniels, del Junco,

Dyhrkopp, Fineman, Kessler,

McWherter, Rider and Walsh;

Postmaster General Henderson, Deputy

Postmaster General Nolan, Secretary to

the Board Hunter, and General Counsel

Gibbons.

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The

General Counsel of the United States

Postal Service has certified that the

meeting was properly closed under the

Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Requests for information about the

meeting should be addressed to the

Secretary of the Board, David G. Hunter,

at (202) 268–4800.

David G. Hunter,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–10266 Filed 4–20–01; 2:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710–12–M

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Privacy Act of 1974; Proposed

Changes to Systems of Records

AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board.

ACTION: Notice of proposed new system

of records.

SUMMARY: The purpose of this document

is to give notice of a proposed new

Privacy Act system of records, RRB–50,

Child Care Tuition Assistance Program.

DATES: The proposes new system of

records shall become effective as

proposed without further notice in 40

calendar days from the date of this

publication unless comments are

received before this date which would

result in a contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Beatrice

Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, Railroad

Retirement Board, 844 North Rush

Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611–2092.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2001 / Notices 20695

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

LeRoy Blommaert, Privacy Act Officer,

Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North

Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611–

2092, (312) 751–4548.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public

Law 106–58 authorizes Federal agencies

to fund out of appropriated funds a

child care tuition assistance program for

lower income families who pay for

qualified child care. The Railroad

Retirement Board is establishing a

program under which child care tuition

assistance would be provided to eligible

agency employees.

The Railroad Retirement Board will

collect family income data from RRB

employees who make application under

the RRB Child Care Tuition Assistance

Program. The family income data will

be used by the RRB to determine

eligibility under the program, and if

eligibility is determined, to make a

further determination as to the amount

of monthly tuition assistance that will

be made. In addition, the RRB will

collect information from the employee’s

child care provider(s) for verification

purposes; e.g. that the provider is fully

licensed.

On April 12, 2001, the Railroad

Retirement Board filed a new system

report for this system with the House

Committee on Government Operations,

the Senate Committee on Governmental

Affairs, and the Office of Management

and Budget. This was done to comply

with Section 3 of the Privacy Act of

1974 and OMB Circular No. A–130,

Appendix I.

By authority of the Board.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

RRB–50

SYSTEM NAME:

RRB–50, Child Care Tuition

Assistance Program.

SYSTEM LOCATION:

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 844

North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois

60611–2092.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM:

Current and former Railroad

Retirement Board employees who

voluntarily applied for child care tuition

assistance, the employee’s spouse, the

employee’s children and their child care

providers.

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

Employee (parent) name, Social

Security Number, pay grade, home and

work numbers, addresses, total family

income, spouse employment

information, names of children on

whose behalf the employee parent is

applying for tuition assistance, each

applicable child’s date of birth,

information on child care providers

used (including name, address, provider

license number and state where issued,

tuition cost, and provided tax

identification number), and copies of

IRS Form 1040 and 1040A for

verification purposes. Other records

may include the child’s social security

number, weekly expense, pay

statements, records relating to direct

deposits, verification of qualification

and administration for child care

assistance.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

Pub. L. 106–58, section 643 and E.O.

9397.

PURPOSE(S):

The purpose of the system is to

determine eligibility for, and the

amount of, the child care tuition

assistance for lower income RRB

employees.

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

a. Records may be released to agency

employees on a need to know basis.

b. Relevant records relating to an

individual may be disclosed to a

congressional office in response to an

inquiry from the Congressional office

made at the request of that individual.

c. Relevant information may be

disclosed to the Office of the President

for responding to an individual

pursuant to an inquiry from that

individual or from a third party in his/

her behalf.

d. Relevant records may be disclosed

to representatives of the General

Services Administration or the National

Archives and Records Administration

who are conducting records

management inspections under the

authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.

e. Records may be disclosed in

response to a request for discovery or for

the appearance or a witness, to the

extent that what is disclosed is relevant

to the subject matter involved in a

pending judicial or administrative

proceeding.

f. Records may be disclosed in a

proceeding before a court or

adjudicative body to the extent that they

are relevant and necessary to the

proceeding.

g. In the event that material in this

system indicates a violation of law,

whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in

nature, and whether arising by general

statute, or by regulation, rule, or order

issued pursuant thereto, the relevant

records may be disclosed to the

appropriate agency, whether Federal,

State, local or foreign, charged with the

responsibility of investigating or

prosecuting such violation or charged

with enforcing or implementing the

statute, rule, regulation, or order, issued

pursuant thereto.

h. Relevant records may be disclosed

to respond to a Federal agency’s request

made in connection with the hiring or

retention of an employee, the letting of

a contract or issuance of a grant, license

or other benefit by the requesting

agency, but only to the extent that the

information disclosed is relevant and

necessary to the requesting agency’s

decision on the matter.

i. Relevant records may be disclosed

to the Office of Personnel Management

or the General Accounting Office when

the information is required for

evaluation of the subsidy program.

j. Records may be disclosed to an

expert, consultant, or contractor of RRB

(including employees of the contractor)

if the RRB decides to contract with a

private firm for the implementation of

any part of the program.

k. Relevant records may be disclosed

to child care providers to verify a

covered child’s dates of attendance at

the provider’s facility.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

STORAGE:

Paper and computer hard disk,

cartridge, and tape.

RETRIEVABILITY:

Name, Social Security Number.

SAFEGUARDS:

When not in use by an authorized

person, paper records are stored in

lockable cabinets in a building with

security cameras and 24-hour security

guards. Access to electronic records

require the use of restricted passwords.

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

These records will be maintained

permanently until their official

retention period is established.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:

Director of Human Resources, U.S.

Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North

Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611–

2092.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:

Requests for information regarding an

individual’s record should be in writing

addressed to the Systems Manager

identified above, including the full

name and social security number of the

20696 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2001 / Notices

1 Investment Company Act Release No. 24828

(Jan. 17, 2001) [66 FR 8509 (Feb. 1, 2001),

correction 66 FR 14828 (Mar. 14, 2001)] (‘‘Adopting

Release’’). All references to ‘‘rule 35d–1’’ or any

paragraph of the rule are to 17 CFR 270.35d–1, as

adopted by the Adopting Release.

2See Adopting Release, supra note 1, 66 FR at

8516–8518.

3The Commission estimates that 24 investment

companies and series would provide prior notice to

shareholders of a change in their investment

policies pursuant to a notice policy adopted in

accordance with rule 35d–1, and that the annual

burden for each such investment company or series

would be 20 hours, for a total annual burden of 480

hours. See Adopting Release, supra note 1, 66 FR

at 8517.

4The Commission estimates that 202 open-end

management investment companies or series that

file post-effective amendments or initial registration

individual. Before information about

any record will be released, the System

Manager may require the individual to

provide proof of identity or require the

requester to furnish an authorization

from the individual to permit release of

information.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

See Notification section above.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

See Notification section above.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

Applications for child care tuition

assistance submitted voluntarily by RRB

employees; forms completed by child

care providers.

SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT:

None.

[FR Doc. 01–10030 Filed 4–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905–01–M

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. IC–24939; File No. S7–11–97]

RIN 3235–AH11

Investment Company Names; OMB

Approval of Collections of Information

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of OMB Approval of

Collections of Information.

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange

Commission adopted rule 35d–1 under

the Investment Company Act of 1940 on

January 17, 2001. Rule 35d–1 addresses

certain broad categories of investment

company names that are likely to

mislead investors about an investment

company’s investments and risks.

Certain provisions of rule 35d–1 contain

‘‘collection of information’’

requirements within the meaning of the

Paperwork Reduction Act [44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.], and the Commission

submitted the proposed collections of

information to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

review. The Office of Management and

Budget has approved the collection of

information requirements contained in

rule 35d–1.

DATES: On March 13, 2001, OMB

approved the collections of information

contained in rule 35d–1.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul

G. Cellupica, Senior Special Counsel,

Office of Disclosure and Insurance

Product Regulation, at (202) 942–0670,

in the Division of Investment

Management, Securities and Exchange

Commission, 450 5th Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20549–0506.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Securities and Exchange Commission

(‘‘Commission’’) adopted new rule 35d–

1 [17 CFR 270.35d–1] under the

Investment Company Act of 1940 [15

U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.] (‘‘Investment

Company Act’’) on January 17, 2001.1

Rule 35d–1 addresses certain broad

categories of investment company

names that are likely to mislead

investors about an investment

company’s investments and risks. The

rule requires a registered investment

company with a name suggesting that

the company focuses on a particular

type of investment (e.g., an investment

company that calls itself the ABC Stock

Fund, the XYZ Bond Fund, or the QRS

U.S. Government Fund) to invest at least

80% of its assets in the type of

investment suggested by its name. The

rule also addresses other types of

names, including names suggesting that

an investment company focuses its

investments in a particular country or

geographic region.

The rule generally requires that the

80% investment requirement either may

be a fundamental policy of an

investment company affected by the

rule, or the investment company may

adopt a policy to provide notice to

shareholders at least 60 days prior to

any change in its 80% investment

policy. Additionally, an investment

company with a name suggesting that it

focuses its investments in a particular

country or geographic region must

disclose in its prospectus the specific

criteria that are used to select

investments that meet this standard, in

order for its name not to be deemed

misleading under the rule.

As explained in the Adopting Release,

certain provisions of rule 35d–1 contain

‘‘collection of information’’

requirements within the meaning of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.].2 In the Adopting

Release, the Commission estimated the

burden hours for these collection of

information requirements and solicited

comments on the collection of

information requirements and the

burden estimate. The Commission

submitted the proposed collection of

information requirements to OMB for

review in accordance with 44 U.S.C.

3507 and 5 CFR 1320.11. The titles for

the collections of information are: (1)

‘‘Rule 35d–1 under the Investment

Company Act of 1940, Investment

Company Names’’; (2) ‘‘Form N–1A

under the Investment Company Act of

1940 and Securities Act of 1933,

Registration Statement of Open-End

Management Investment Companies’’;

and (3) ‘‘Form N–2 under the

Investment Company Act of 1940 and

Securities Act of 1933, Registration

Statement of Closed-End Management

Companies.’’ The Commission did not

receive any comments on the collection

of information requirements of rule

35d–1.

The purpose of the notice policy

provision of rule 35d–1 is to ensure that

when shareholders purchase shares in

an investment company based on its

name, and with the expectation that it

will follow the investment policy

suggested by that name, they will have

sufficient time to decide whether to

redeem their shares in the event that the

investment company decides to pursue

a different investment policy. The

Commission estimates that the total

annual burden of this notice policy

provision will be 480 hours.3

The purpose of the prospectus

disclosure requirement of rule 35d–1

applicable to investment companies

with names suggesting an investment

focus in a particular country or

geographic region is to enable investors

to make more informed choices about

their investments in investment

companies with such names. The likely

respondents to this information

collection are open-end management

investment companies or series

registering with the Commission on

Form N–1A and closed-end

management investment companies

registering with the Commission on

Form N–2. The Commission estimates

that the total annual burden of this

disclosure requirement will be 404

hours for open-end management

investment companies or series filing

post-effective amendments or initial

registration statements on Form N–1A,

and 52 hours for closed-end

management investment companies

filing registration statements on Form

N–2.4