21138 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 77 / Thursday, April 20, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

Applicability: Model R22 Helicopters,

serial numbers (S/N) 0002 through 2862,

inclusive, with sprag clutch, part number (P/

N) A188–2, S/N 3708 through 3757 inclusive,

3808 through 3893 inclusive, and 3908

through 4207 inclusive, installed, certificated

in any category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in

the area subject to the requirements of this

AD. For helicopters that have been modified,

altered, or repaired so that the performance

of the requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required within 30 calendar

days or 50 hours time-in-service, whichever

occurs first, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent sprag clutch failure, loss of

main rotor RPM during autorotation, and

subsequent loss of control of the helicopter,

accomplish the following:

(a) Replace sprag clutch, P/N A188–2, S/N

3708 through 3757 inclusive, 3808 through

3893 inclusive, and 3908 through 4207

inclusive, with sprag clutch, P/N A188–2, S/

N 4208 or higher.

(b) Remove from the Rotorcraft Flight

Manual the Special Pilot Caution, revised

March 22, 1999, contained in Robinson

Helicopter Company R22 Service Bulletin

SB–85, dated March 22, 1999, or the Special

Pilot Caution insert in the Normal Procedures

Section of the Rotorcraft Flight Manual

between pages P.4–8 and P.4–9 required by

AD 99–07–17, Docket No. 99–SW–24–AD,

Amendment 39–11126 (64 FR 17966, April

13, 1999), as applicable.

(c) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, Los

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.

Operators shall submit their requests through

an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,

who may concur or comment and then send

it to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft

Certification Office.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Los Angeles Aircraft

Certification Office.

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter

to a location where the requirements of this

AD can be accomplished.

(e) This amendment becomes effective on

May 5, 2000.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 13,

2000.

Eric Bries,

Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,

Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 00–9897 Filed 4–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR Part 101

[T.D. 00–27]

Technical Correction; Description of

Gramercy, Louisiana, Boundaries

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service,

Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This document amends the

Customs Regulations pertaining to the

field organization of Customs by

correcting the boundary description of

Gramercy, Louisiana.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Harold Singer, Chief, Regulations

Branch, U.S. Customs Service, 202–927–

2268.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

Customs established a port of entry of

Gramercy, Louisiana, by a final rule

document published as Treasury

Decision (T.D.) 82–93 in the Federal

Register (47 FR 21039) on May 17, 1982.

A description of the port of entry was

set forth in the document.

On May 31, 1984, Customs published

in the Federal Register (49 FR 22629)

T.D. 84–126, a final rule document

setting forth the port limits of all the

ports in the then New Orleans Customs

district. One of the ports, of which the

boundaries were described, was

Gramercy, Louisiana. The document

extended the limits of the Gramercy port

from those set forth in T. D. 82–93.

In a document published in the

Federal Register (49 FR 27142) on July

2, 1984, Customs delayed the effective

date of T.D. 84–126 regarding the

extension of the port boundaries of

Gramercy. This document stated that

‘‘[t]he listing for Gramercy shall remain

as set forth in section 101.3(b), Customs

Regulations,’’ meaning that the

description of the Gramercy port would

continue to be as set forth in T.D. 82–

93.

The Customs Regulations correctly

reflected that the port limits of

Gramercy were as set forth in T.D. 82–

93 until T.D. 95–77 was published in

the Federal Register (60 FR 50008) on

September 27, 1995. In that document,

which included a revision of section

101.3 to reflect the reorganization of

Customs, the reference to T.D. 84–126

was inadvertently inserted in the

‘‘Limits of port ‘‘ column next to the

listing of the port of entry of Gramercy

under the State of Louisiana.

This document corrects the error by

removing the reference ‘‘(Restated in

T.D. 84–126)’’ in the ‘‘Limits of port’’

column adjacent to the entry of

Gramercy in the ‘‘Ports of entry

column’’ under the State of Louisiana in

section 101.3(b), Customs Regulations.

Inapplicability of Public Notice and

Comment and Delayed Effective Date

Because this document relates to

agency organization and management

and merely corrects the geographical

description of a port, it is not subject to

the notice and public procedure

requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553. For the

same reasons, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.

553(d)(3), a delayed effective date is not

required.

Regulatory Flexibiilty Act

Because this document is not subject

to the notice and public procedure

requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553, this

document is not subject to the

provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility

Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).

Executive Order 12866

Agency organization matters are

exempt from consideration under

Executive Order 12866.

Drafting Information

The principal author of this document

was Janet L. Johnson. However,

personnel from other offices

participated in its development.

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101

Customs duties and inspection,

Customs ports of entry, Exports,

Imports, Organization and functions

(Government agencies).

Amendment to the Regulations

Accordingly, Part 101 of the Customs

Regulations is amended as set forth

below.

PART 101—GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. The general authority citation for

Part 101 and the specific authority

citation for § 101.3 continue to read as

follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 19 U.S.C. 2, 66,

1202 (General Note 20, Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 77 / Thursday, April 20, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 21139

Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under

19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;

* * * * *

§ 101.3 [Amended]

2. The list of ports in § 101.3(b)(1) is

amended, under the State of Louisiana

in the entry for Gramercy, by removing

in the ‘‘Limits of port’’ column the

words ‘‘(Restated in T.D. 84–126).’’

Dated: April 14, 2000.

Stuart P. Seidel,

Assistant Commissioner, Office of

Regulations and Rulings.

[FR Doc. 00–9868 Filed 4–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4820–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[AAG/A Order No. 196–2000]

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is

exempting a Privacy Act system of

records from subsections (c)(3) and (4);

(d); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5), and (8); and (g)

of the Privacy Act. 5 U.S.C. 552a. This

system of records is maintained by the

Immigration and Naturalization Service

(INS) and is entitled ‘‘Attorney/

Representative Complaint/Petitiion

Files, JUSTICE/INS–022.’’

Information in this system relates to

complaints filed against nonagency

attorneys and/or representatives who

have engaged in unethical or

unprofessional activities. The

exemptions are necessary to avoid

interference during the conduct of

criminal, civil, or administrative actions

or investigations. Specifically, the

exemptions are necessary to prevent

subjects of investigations from

frustrating the investigatory process.

The exemptions are necessary to avoid

interference during the conduct of civil

or administrative actions or

investigations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Cahill—202–307–1823.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

December 16, 1999 (64 FR 70203) a

proposed rule was published in the

Federal Register with an invitation to

comment. No comments were received.

This order relates to individuals

rather than small business entities.

Nevertheless, pursuant to the

requirements of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, it is

hereby stated that the order will not

have ‘‘a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.’’

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16

Administrative Practices and

Procedures, Courts, Freedom of

Information Act, Government in the

Sunshine Act, and the Privacy Act.

Dated: April 5, 2000.

Stephen R. Colgate,

Assistant Attorney General for

Administration.

Pursuant to the authority vested in the

Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 552a and

delegated to me by Attorney General

Order No. 793–78, 28 CFR part 16 is

amended as follows:

PART 16—[AMENDED]

1. The authority for Part 16 continues

to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g),

553; 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510,

534, 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701.

2. 28 CFR 16.99 is amended by adding

paragraphs (k) and (l) to read as follows:

§ 16.99 Exemption of the Immigration and

Naturalization Service Systems-limited

access.

* * * * *

(k) The Attorney/Representative

Complaint/Petition File (JUSTICE/INS–

022) system of records is exempt under

the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2)

from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d);

(e)(1), (2), (3), (5), and (8); and (g); but

only to the extent that this system

contains records within the scope of

subsection (j)(2), and to the extent that

records in this system are subject to

exemption therefrom. In addition, this

system of records is also exempt in part

under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a

(k)(2) from subsections (c)(3); (d); and

(e)(1), but only to the extent that this

system contains records within the

scope of subsection (k)(2), and to the

extent that records in this system are

subject to exemption therefrom.

(l) The following justifications apply

to the exemptions from particular

subsections:

(1) From subsection (c)(3) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(1) of this section.

(2) From subsection (c)(4) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(2) of this section.

(3) From the access and amendment

provisions of subsection (d) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(3) of this section.

(4) From subsection (e)(1) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(4) of this section.

(5) From subsection (e)(2) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(5) of this section.

(6) From subsection (e)(3) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(6) of this section.

(7) From subsection (e)(5) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(7) of this section.

(8) From subsection (e)(8) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(8) of this section.

(9) From subsection (g) to the extent

that the system is exempt from the

access and amendment provisions of

subsection (d).

[FR Doc. 00–9744 Filed 4–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–CJ–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[AAG/A Order No. 197–2000]

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is

exempting a Privacy Act system of

records from subsections (c)(3) and (4);

(d); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5), and (8); and (g)

of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a. This

system of records is maintained by the

Immigration and Naturalization Service

(INS) and is entitled ‘‘Worksite

Enforcement Activity Record and Index

(LYNX), JUSTICE/INS–025.’’

Information in this system relates to

an enforcement inspection or

investigation pursued under the

Immigration and Nationality Act,

Section 274A(e), involving a specific

individual employer. The exemptions

are necessary to avoid interference

during the conduct of criminal, civil, or

administrative actions or investigations.

Specifically, the exemptions are

necessary to prevent subjects of

investigations from frustrating the

investigatory process. The exemptions

are necessary to avoid interference

during the conduct of civil or

administrative actions or investigations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Cahill—202–307–1823.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

December 16, 1999 (64 FR 70202) a

proposed rule was published in the

Federal Register with an invitation to

comment. No comments were received.

This order relates to individuals

rather than small business entities.

Nevertheless, pursuant to the

requirements of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, it is

hereby stated that the order will not

have ‘‘a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.’’

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16

Administrative Practices and

Procedures, Courts, Freedom of