alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION
 ,
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Verticalnet, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 By:
    
    /s/ NATHANAEL V. LENTZNathanael V. LentzPresident and Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6111 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend to 

the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act 

to extend to the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National 

Historical Park Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HIS4 TORICAL PARK COMMISSION. 

5 Section 6(g) of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal De6 velopment Act (16 U.S.C. 410y–4(g)) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘40’’ and inserting ‘‘50’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Active Power, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John K. Penver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15d, as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John K. Penver                                   
|John K. Penver                                       
|Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                     
|October 27, 2006
# EB-5 Immigrant Investor Process

This page in Simplified Chinese. (PDF, 270.61 KB)

**ALERT:** Beginning Sept. 1, 2022, we will no longer accept a single, combined fee payment when an applicant or petitioner files Form I-526, Immigrant Petition by Standalone Investor, or Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor, together with Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, Form 131, Application for Travel Document, or Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. Petitioners must send a separate fee payment for each form.

If a petitioner or applicant submits a single, combined fee payment for Forms I-526 or I-526E and the other forms, we will reject the forms for improper fee payment and return the fee.

This page provides an overview of the EB-5 petition and application process for immigrating to the United States.
                - File  Form I-526, Immigrant Petition by Standalone Investor , or  Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor .

If an immigrant visa is immediately available to you, you may file Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, together with your Form I-526 or Form I-526E, while your Form I-526 or Form I-526E is pending, or after your Form I-526 or Form I-526E is approved. To make sure that an immigrant visa is immediately available to you when you file your Form I-485, see the Visa Availability and Priority Dates and Adjustment of Status Filing Charts from the Visa Bulletin pages on our website as well as the Visa Bulletin.
                - After we approve your Form I-526 or Form I-526E petition, either:                   - File  DS-260, Application for Immigrant Visa and Alien Registration , with the U.S. Department of State to obtain an EB-5 visa abroad to seek admission to the United States; or
                  - File  Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status,  with USCIS (if you did not already file Form I-485 prior to Form I-526 or Form I-526E approval) to adjust status to a conditional permanent resident within the United States. Once we approve your Form I-485 application or upon admission into the United States with an EB-5 immigrant visa, we will grant conditional permanent residence to the EB-5 investor and derivative family members for a two-year period.
                - File  Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status , within the 90-day period immediately before the second anniversary of your adjustment of status or admission to the United States as a conditional permanent resident.
                - If USCIS approves this petition, we will remove the conditions from your lawful permanent resident status and from that of any dependents you included.

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

I, Charles E. Harris, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Intellon Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Intellon Corporation.

Date: March 13, 2009

By:

/s/    CHARLES E. HARRISCharles E. HarrisChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
* This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### October 28, 2010 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### October 28, 2010 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. FERNANDO VAZQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-7040 (D.C. No. 6:07-CR-00047-RAW-11) (E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , LUCERO , and HOLMES , Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver contained in defendant Fernando Vazquez’s plea agreement. The defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of controlled substances. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the defendant waived his right to appeal his conviction or his sentence, provided his sentence was within the statutory maximum authorized by law and within the-2- advisory sentencing guideline range determined by the district court to apply. The defendant’s sentence was below the statutory maximum and within the advisory guideline range. Nevertheless, the defendant filed a notice of appeal. The government filed a motion to enforce the plea agreement pursuant to United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). In response, the defendant’s counsel stated that there are no non-frivolous arguments that can be presented in response to the motion to enforce, citing Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), and requesting permission to withdraw as counsel. This court gave the defendant an opportunity to file a pro se response to the motion to enforce, see id. , and granted him an extension of time to file his response to the motion. To date, the defendant has not filed a response to the motion to enforce. Under Anders, we have reviewed the motion and the record and we conclude that the defendant’s proposed appeal falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights, and that enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. See Hahn , 359 F.3d at 1325 (describing the factors this court considers when determining whether to enforce a waiver of appellate rights).-3- Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to enforce the appeal waiver, GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw, and DISMISS the appeal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 31.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary H. Schlatter certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OraLabs Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Acts Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.





Dated November 21, 2005                /s/ Gary H. Schlatter
                                     -------------------------
                                            President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of 30DC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period  ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Edward Dale, Principal Executive
Officer,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chairman of the Board of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 13, 2011


/s/ Edward Dale
------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward Dale,
Principal Executive Officer, President and Chief Executive Officer

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Sonoma Valley Bancorp (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), We, Mel Switzer, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer and Mary Dieter Smith, Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , that to the best of our
knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.







Dated: March
      20, 2008
            /s/ Mel Switzer,
      Jr.,


Mel
Switzer, Jr.,


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)




Dated:
      March
      20, 2008
            /s/ Mary Dieter
      Smith,




Mary
Dieter Smith,


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 16, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50984

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DOUGLAS CHRISTOPHER JONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-69-ALL

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Douglas Christopher Jones appeals the sentence he received

after he pleaded guilty to possession of more than five grams of

cocaine base with intent to distribute and the intentional use of

a minor to avoid detection. Because Jones fails to show that he

would have received a different sentence under Guidelines that

were only advisory, he fails to establish plain error under

United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). See United

States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 732, 733-34 (5th Cir.
No. 04-50984

-2-

2005), petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). 

Further, given that Jones twice tested positive for drug use

subsequent to his arrest, he fails to show that the district

court clearly erred when it denied an adjustment for acceptance

of responsibility. See United States v. Villaneuva, 

408 F.3d 193, 203 & n.9, (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert.

filed (July 26, 2005) (No. 05-5580); United States v. Flucas, 99

F.3d 177, 180 (5th Cir. 1996); U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment.

(nn.1(B), 3, and 5).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 00-2132

JAMES R. KIRKPATRICK, APPELLANT,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before HOLDAWAY, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

The appellant, through counsel, seeks review of a September 29, 2000, decision of the Board

of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) that denied a Department of Veterans Affairs rating greater than 30%

for his service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In his brief, the appellant argues,

in part, that the BVA decision impermissibly relied upon factors in the General Rating Formula for

Mental Disorders adopted by the Secretary rather than upon the specific symptoms of PTSD in the

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, which he asserts were also

adopted by the Secretary in 38 C.F.R. § 4.130 (2001). 

The Court notes that the above issue in the instant case is identical to the issue in Mauerhan

v. Principi, No. 01-468, currently pending before the Court, and that the disposition of Mauerhan,

supra, couldmaterially affect the instant proceedings. Therefore, in the interest of judicial economy,

the Court will stay further proceedings in the instant case pending the disposition of Mauerhan,

supra.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, that this matter is stayed pending the disposition of Mauerhan,

supra, or further order of the Court.

DATED: May 10, 2002 PER CURIAM.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jose Araque, President, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Jose Araque
----------------------------------------
Jose Araque
President, Principal Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer,
Chairman of the Board of Directors

August 15, 2006
**Exhibit 8****List of Subsidiaries of Metal Storm Limited**         **Name of Subsidiary** **Percentage Owned**  **Jurisdiction of Formation** Metal Storm Inc.  100%(a)   DelawareMetal Storm U.S.A. Limited  100%(b)   DelawareProCam Machine LLC  100%(c)   WashingtonDigiGun LLC  100%(d)   Delaware (a) Metal Storm Limited directly owns 49% of Metal Storm Inc. and officers of Metal Storm Limitedwho are U.S. citizens own the remaining 51% of the company through a trust. (b) Metal Storm Limited directly owns 100% of Metal Storm U.S.A. Limited. Metal Storm U.S.A.Limited was incorporated in Delaware on March 31, 2004. (c) Metal Storm Limited directly owns 100% of ProCam Machine LLC. Metal Storm Limited sold theassets and liabilities of ProCam to Monroe Machine Products, Inc. on June 1, 2005. (d) Metal Storm Limited directly owns 100% of DigiGun LLC, which was formed in Delaware on May 6,2004.