alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from GST
Funding's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             $ 0
<SECURITIES>                                17,465,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,465,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             262,523,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,630,000
<BONDS>                                    265,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,107,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               262,523,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,845,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,023,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (178,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (178,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (178,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 601 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 601

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the conveyance of parcels of land to Mantua, Box Elder 
                             County, Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Box Elder Utah Land Conveyance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN LANDS TO MANTUA, BOX ELDER, UTAH.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
convey, without consideration, to the town of Mantua, Utah (in this 
section referred to as the ``town''), all right, title, and interest of 
the United States in and to parcels of National Forest System land in 
the Wasatch-Cache National Forest in Box Elder County, Utah, consisting 
of approximately 31.5 acres within section 27, township 9 north, range 
1 west, Salt Lake meridian and labeled as parcels A, B, and C on the 
map entitled ``Box Elder Utah Land Conveyance Act'' and dated July 14, 
2008.
    (b) Survey.--If necessary, the exact acreage and legal description 
of the lands to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by 
a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be 
borne by the town.
    (c) Use of Land.--As a condition of the conveyance under subsection 
(a), the town shall use the land conveyed under such subsection for 
public purposes.
    (d) Reversionary Interest.--In the quitclaim deed to the town 
prepared as part of the conveyance under subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall provide that the land conveyed to the town under such subsection 
shall revert to the Secretary, at the election of the Secretary, if the 
land is used for other than public purposes.
    (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
authorized under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate 
to protect the interests of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 23, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 601

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the conveyance of parcels of land to Mantua, Box Elder 
                             County, Utah.
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-16,779-36

IN RE KIRK WAYNE McBRIDE, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. CR95-129-12 IN THE 22nd DISTRICT COURT

FROM COMAL COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 22nd District Court of Comal County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Comal

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Comal County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application and that the 180-day time frame set out in TEX. R. APP. P.

73.4(b)(5) has not expired shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to

file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: July 25, 2018

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

     In  connection  with the  annual  report  of  Sonoma  Valley  Bancorp  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We,
Mel Switzer, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Mary Dieter Smith, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , that to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated: March 15, 2006               /s/ Mel Switzer, Jr.
       --------------               -------------------------------------------
                                    Mel Switzer, Jr.,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: March 15, 2006               /s/ Mary Dieter Smith
       --------------               -------------------------------------------
                                    Mary Dieter Smith,
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 19, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00586

- CR

David Reza CANTU

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR8900

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea

- bargain case,

and the defendant has NO right of appeal .” It is therefore ORDERED t hat the trial court clerk

file the electronic clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the

following documents:

1. All pre

- trial orders and the related pre

- tria l motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post

- judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of a ppeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk

of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this or der to the attorneys of record, the trial court

clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20340

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS PENALOZA-LOPEZ, also known as Carlos Penaloza,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-569-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Penaloza-Lopez has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Penaloza-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-20340 Document: 00512597951 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-20340

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-20340 Document: 00512597951 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GST
FUNDING'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         208,000
<SECURITIES>                                34,387,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,595,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             264,236,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,874,000
<BONDS>                                    265,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,638,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               264,236,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,090,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          27,069,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,457,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,979,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,979,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
- Home

# Report a Complaint

**What are these options?**

Constituents who are hard of hearing or use a video phone have the option to choose TDD or VP based on the type of device they are using. This allows our office to respond to them accordingly. The default option 'Voice' is a standard audible telephone.

## Contact Us

              - Report a Complaint
              - Doing Business with USCP
              - Frequently Asked Questions
              - Website Problem
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 01-21 

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

 Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled 

by the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William P. Greene, 

Jr., having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The Chief 

Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Greene would provide substantial service 

necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

 Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

 ORDERED that, effective January 4, 2021, through December 31, 2021, recall-eligible retired 

Judge Greene is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). Judge Greene 

shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active service 

and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. It is 

further 

 ORDERED that Judge Greene shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2021 to review 

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other substantial service 

at the request of the Chief Judge and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up to 90 days 

or its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Greene's service may be extended beyond 90 days. 

 

DATED: January 4, 2021 BY THE COURT: 

MARGARET BARTLEY 

 Chief Judge
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David She, the Chief Financial Officer of AMERICAN LORAIN CORPORATION (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that:

| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                               

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 9th day of May, 2012.

/s/ David SheDavid She 
  Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by
American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
#### Jean Reavey, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

— In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.), dated June 14, 1985, which, after a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, dismissed the claim.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, with costs, the claimant is awarded judgment against the defendant on the issue of liability, and the matter is remitted to the Court of Claims for a trial on the issue of damages.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the claimant proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the proximate cause of her injuries was the State’s breach of its duty to exercise reasonable care to protect patients in State institutions from injury *(see, Killeen v State of New York,*66 NY2d 850, 851). The claimant, a patient at the Hudson River *657Psychiatric Center, sustained her injuries as the result of a fall which occurred while she was being escorted by a therapy aide from one building to another. At the time, the claimant was suffering from severe depression, and her symptoms included psychomotor retardation, which generally slowed her physical movements; and somatic delusions, which impaired her use of her hands. She was receiving antidepressant and antipsychotic medications which produced, as side effects, lethargy, weakness, drowsiness and dizziness. The therapy aide in whose care the claimant was entrusted had also suffered an impairment in the use of one hand as a result of a previous accident. Immediately prior to the incident in question, the aide had walked with the claimant between the two buildings, and her arm interlocked with that of the claimant. However, when they arrived at their destination, the aide left the claimant standing unattended on the steps of the building while she proceeded to open the door. Upon turning around, she saw that the claimant had fallen to the ground.

The State is not an insurer of the patients at its institutions, nor is it obligated to maintain constant surveillance of each of its patients *(see, Killeen v State of New York, supra,*p 851). However, it does owe a duty of care which is commensurate with the patient’s ability to provide for his or her own safety *(see, Killeen v State of New York, supra,*p 852). Here, it was clearly foreseeable that the claimant, whose ability to provide for her own safety was limited by her illness and by the effects of medication, would fall if left unattended. Hence, the State breached its duty by allowing a single aide with a physical disability to transport the claimant and to leave her, albeit momentarily, unattended.

Accordingly, we reverse the judgment dismissing the claim, award judgment to the claimant on the issue of liability, and remit the case to the Court of Claims for a trial on the issue of damages. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Bracken and Hooper, JJ., concur.
#               I-361, Affidavit of Financial Support and Intent to Petition for Legal Custody for Public Law 97-359 Amerasian

To be filed in support of Form I-360, Petition to Classify Public Law 97-359 Amerasian as the Child, Son, or Daughter of a United States Citizen. The form is filed as your agreement to provide financial support for a 5-year period for an Amerasian or to petition a court for legal custody of an Amerasian under 18 years of age.

## Forms and Document Downloads

Form I-361  (PDF, 505.06 KB)

Instructions for Form I-361  (PDF, 220.61 KB)

## Form Details

04/01/24. Starting June 3, 2024, we will accept only the 04/01/24 edition. Until then, you can also use the 09/11/15 edition. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

You must swear to, or affirm the affidavit before an officer of USCIS if you are in the United States, or a U.S. immigration or consular officer if you are outside the U.S. The form must be submitted along with your Form I-360. You must submit Form I-361 in duplicate.

You can find the filing fee for Form I-361 by visiting our Fee Schedule page. 

Please do not submit this checklist with your Form I-361. The checklist is an optional tool to use as you prepare your form, but does not replace statutory, regulatory, and form instruction requirements. We recommend that you review these requirements before completing and submitting your form. **Do not send original documents unless specifically requested in the form instructions or applicable regulations.**

If you submit any documents (copies or original documents, if requested) in a foreign language, you must include a full English translation along with a certification from the translator verifying that the translation is complete and accurate, and that they are competent to translate from the foreign language into English.

**Did you provide the following?**
                    - A statement from an officer of the bank or other financial institution in which you have deposits;
                    - A statement from your employer;
                    - A copy of your last income tax return filed, or a report of commercial rating concern (if self-employed); and
                    - A list containing the serial numbers and denominations of bonds and names of the owners (if applicable).

**Filing Tips:**Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.** We will reject any unsigned form.

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT
      23.1





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-107519) of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. of our report dated May 15,
      2006
      relating to the consolidated financial statements of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc.
      and
      the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form
      10-KSB.








/s/
      Burr,
      Pilger & Mayer LLP


San
      Francisco, California


June
      28,
      200 6