alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,730
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (572)
<INVENTORY>                                     42,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,116
<PP&E>                                          63,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,578
<BONDS>                                        285,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,735
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (134,449)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,802
<SALES>                                        232,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,441
<CGS>                                          147,092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  208,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,368
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,228)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,228)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. Law 92-463), announcement is made of the following Committee Meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         Army Science Board (ASB) Analysis Panel.                    

*Date of Meeting:*                         May 1-2, 2001.                    

*Time of Meeting:*                         0800-1700.                    

*Places:*                         May 1—IDA; May 2—Ft. Belvoir.                    

*Agenda:*                         The Analysis Panel of the Army Science Board's (ASB) Summer Study, “Objective Force Soldier/Soldier Teams” will visit IDA and Ft. Belvoir. These meetings will be open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.                    

*For further information:*                         Please contact Karen Williams at (407) 384-3937.                    

Wayne Joyner,

Executive Assistant, Army Science Board.

[FR Doc. 01-10185  Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-3336

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Donnie Wayne Robinson, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

 ____________

Submitted: March 17, 2023

Filed: March 22, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Donnie Robinson, Jr. appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after

he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel has moved for leave to

1The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa.
withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

arguing that the sentence was unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a

substantively unreasonable sentence, as the court properly considered the factors

listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See

United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing

sentences for substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse of discretion

standard; abuse of discretion occurs when the court fails to consider relevant factor,

gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commits a clear error

of judgment in weighing the appropriate factors). Further, the court imposed a

sentence below the Guidelines range. See United States v. McCauley, 715 F.3d 1119,

1127 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that when the district court has varied below the

Guidelines range, it is “nearly inconceivable” that the court abused its discretion in

not varying further).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we

affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

 

CERTIFICATION

 

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008of Hydrogenics Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”)and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Lawrence Davis, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, that:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:                            | /s/ Lawrence Davis |   |
|--------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                           |               |
| Name: Lawrence Davis           |               |
|                           |               |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |               |

 

Date: June 30, 2009

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will beretained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeHomeUnitsUnit Display

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Pacific Southwest (D11) 

#### 

(510) 437-3701 - For maritime emergency use only 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### In re NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, L.P., Petitioner.

Misc. No. 994.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 2, 2011.

Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION

Lourie, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

National Oilwell Vareo, L.P. (NOV) seeks a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas to allow “basic discovery.” Hydril Co., L.P. opposes. NOV replies.

The remedy of mandamus is available only in extraordinary situations to correct a clear abuse of discretion or usurpation of judicial power. *In re Calmar, Inc.,*854 F.2d 461, 464 (Fed.Cir.1988). A party seeking a writ bears the burden of proving that it has no other means of attaining the relief desired, *Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Southern Dist. of Iowa,*490 U.S. 296, 309, 109 S.Ct. 1814, 104 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989), and that the right to issuance of the writ is “clear and indisputable,” *Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). A court may deny mandamus relief “even though on normal appeal, a court might find reversible error.” *In re Cordis Corp.,*769 F.2d 733, 737 (Fed.Cir.1985).

In the papers submitted, NOV has not shown why it cannot raise any challenge to the district court’s discovery determinations on appeal from a final judgment. Although NOV argues that it will be unable to present a proper record on appeal without this court’s intervention now and that it wishes to “avoid piece by piece” appeal, that argument is generally insufficient to warrant mandamus relief. *See Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland,*346 U.S. 379, 383, 74 S.Ct. 145, 98 L.Ed. 106 (1953) (“[I]t is established that the extraordinary writs cannot be used as substitutes for appeals ... even though hardship may result from delay and perhaps unnecessary trial”). NOV will still be able to argue about the propriety of the district court’s discovery determinations on appeal. Because NOV has failed to meet its burden of establishing the extraordinary circumstances necessary to grant mandamus relief, we deny the petition.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-0033-CV

In re Pedro Lucio

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Filed: January 18, 2013
(85 South. 921)

#### COMPTON v. CUNNINGHAM.

(2 Div. 719.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 15, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marengo County; R. I. Jones, Judge.

S. W. Compton, of Demopolis, for appellant.

Wm. Cunninghame, of Linden, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from a ruling on demurrer to a bill in equity, and *698should have been taken within 30 days. Section 2S38, Code 1907; Acts 1915, p. 137. Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          54,185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,146
<INVENTORY>                                     71,767
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,431
<PP&E>                                         874,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,039,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,042
<BONDS>                                      1,337,921
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       749,900
<OTHER-SE>                                   (147,090)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,039,479
<SALES>                                        522,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               522,283
<CGS>                                          139,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  521,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              84,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (90,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (21,088)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (69,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,906)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,042)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.21)
        

</TABLE>
- How To Appeal 
    - Court Forms  and Fees        - Court Forms
      - Fee Schedule
      - Filing Fee 
    - Court Rules and Procedures        - Rules of Practice  and Procedure
      - Procedural Requirements for Staff Conferences
      - Internal Operating Procedures
      - Rules of Admission  and Practice
      - Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability
      - E-Filing Rules
      - Court Process
      - Court Efforts to Ensure Compliance with Court Rules 
    - Information About Practitioners        - Search List of Practitioners
      - Disciplinary Action
      - Key Points in Finding a Representative
      - Compendium of Disciplinary Grievances 
    - Orders and Opinions        - Miscellaneous Orders
      - Ceremonial Orders
      - Opinions and Full Court Orders
      - Search Decisions and Opinions
      - Recent Decisions / Opinions
      - Case Archives 
    - Active Panel Cases 
    - Stayed Cases 
    - Class Action Cases 
    - Electronic Filing 
    - Docket Search 
    - Oral Arguments        - Schedule
      - Oral Arguments via YouTube Live
      - Audio/Video
      - Oral Argument Educational Outreach 

# Active Panel, Stayed, and Class Action Cases

      -    Active Panel Cases 
      -    Stayed Cases 
      -    Class Action Cases 

----

USCAVC 16thJudicial ConferenceSeptember 19-20, 2024

Watch CAVC Oral Arguments on YouTube

Changes to Court Rules Governing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct and Disability - EffectiveJanuary 10, 2024

In the News: Articles

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Holston, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lagaña, J.), rendered October 9, 1985, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, who contested the validity of only 1 of 2 prior convictions for violent felonies *(see,*CPL 400.16; Penal Law § 70.08 [1] [a]), failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating that that predicate felony conviction was unconstitutionally obtained *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9, 15). The defendant was therefore properly adjudicated and sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Powers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ John Powers
                                           -------------------------------------
                                             John Powers
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                             Date: December 14, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Friendly Energy Corporation(the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"),





I,
      Douglass Tallant, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
      14th
      day September 2006.





/s/
      Douglas Tallant


------------------------


Douglas
      Tallant, President/Director
EXHIBIT 31.a  CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Clifford Wildes, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005, of Morgan Beaumont, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects our the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           Our other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-15 and 15d-15) and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and  (c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5.           Our other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for our auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in our internal controls; and        6.           Our other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  /S/ CLIFFORD WILDESDate: June 2, 2006
        Clifford Wildes
Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director   * Provide a separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company. See Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).