alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Secured Data Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Art Malone Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.






March 31, 2004                   /s/ Art Malone Jr.
--------------                   -------------------------------
                                 Art Malone Jr.
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 15-19

IN RE COURT CLOSURE ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 24, 2019, AND TUESDAY, DECEMBER 31, 2019.

O R D E R

By direction of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

will be closed on Tuesday, December 24, 2019, and Tuesday, December 31, 2019.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice 

and Procedure, Tuesday, December, 24, 2019, and Tuesday, December 31, 2019, will be 

considered days when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: November 7, 2019 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
#### Hogan v. Wolf.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

June 6, 1890.)

Limitation or Actions—Running- or Statute.

The statute of limitations begins to run against, a cause of action, for enticing away plaintiff's husband and depriving her of his society and assistance from the - time of the enticement, and is not in the nature of a continuing trespass.

Exceptions from circuit court, New York county.

Action by Catherine A. Hogan against Caroline Wolf. The complaint was dismissed, and the exception taken by plaintiff ordered heard in the first instance at general term.

Argued before Van Brunt, P. J„ and Brady and Daniels, JJ.

*Benjamin Patterson,*for plaintiff. *Edward C. James,*for. defendant.

*897Van Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought to recover damages because of the enticement of the plaintiff’s husband from her in the year 1858, and the depriving the plaintiff of his comfort and society and assistance from that time until the time of his death, which occurred in 1885, 27 years after said alleged enticement. Among other defenses the defendant set up the six-years statute of limitation. Upon the opening of the plaintiff’s counsel the counsel for the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint off the pleadings, which motion was granted, and exception duly taken, which was ordered to be heard in the first instance at the general term. The ground upon which the plaintiff seeks to avoid the statute of limitation is that her rights are similar to those of the owner of land upon which a continuing nuisance is maintained, and a cause of action is renewed each day as long as the nuisance causing the damage continues. I think that it would be difficult to assimilate actions for personal injuries to actions for trespass upon lands. In the one, all the damages suffered or to be suffered can and must be recovered in one action; in the'other, future damages cannot be recovered. In a case similar to the one at bar, if a recovery is once had, without showing that a new cause of action has arisen, no new action can be maintained. The cause of action arises from the enticement, and without any new enticement no new cause of action arises. In the ease at bar but one enticement is alleged. A cause of action then arose and should have been enforced within six years. As now no cause of action can be maintained because oi that enticement, and no new' one is alleged, the subsequent injuries resulting from that enticement cannot revive the right to sue. The exception should be.overruled, and judgment entered in favor of the defendant with costs. All concur.
#### James R. Tomlinson *against*Burke and Clarke.

In an action brought by a firm, it is necessary to set out in the state of demand and proceedings, the Christian names of the individuals composing 'the partnership, or the judgment will be reversed.

This was a *certiorari*brought to reverse a judgment of a justice rendered against Tomlinson, the'defendant below, in his absence upon a state of demand, in the name of *“*Burke and Clarke, plaintiffs,” without stating the Christian names ■of the plaintiffs and setting forth that the defendant owed the plaintiffs on a note of hand, &c., &c. The transcript, 'and all the proceedings in the cause were in the name of *“*Burke and Clarke.”

*351*W. Hoisted*moved to reverse the judgment,

because the Christian names of'the individuals .composing the firm of Burke and Clarke, were not set forth, either in the state of demand or the transcript.

*Hamilton,*contra,

said, that there was no evidence before the court to shew, that Burke and Clarke had any Christian names, or to shew that the words Burke and Clarke did not compose the name of only one individual. The note also upon which the action was brought, was drawn payable to Burke and Clarke without stating any Christian names.

Oh. Justice.

The reason assigned for the reversal is sufficient. There are several decisions in point.

Let the judgment be reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          35,917
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  158,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               733,067
<PP&E>                                      13,928,248
<DEPRECIATION>                               (515,835)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,339,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          529,852
<BONDS>                                      6,045,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    615,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,149,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,339,892
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               956,413
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               553,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             207,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (10,318)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,951
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.7**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCERTIFICATION(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005of Hydrogenics Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Pierre Rivard, President,Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     By: /s/ Pierre Rivard       Name: Pierre Rivard  Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director       Date: March 14, 2006  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toHydrogenics Corporation and will be retained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
476 F.2d 883

#### UNITED STATES of America v. Wilbur JONES, Appellant.

No. 72-1479.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 28, 1972.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and TAMM and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.

*128ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file a non-conforming pleading, it is

Ordered by the Court that the motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file appellant’s lodged motion for release on non-financial conditions pending appeal, and appellee’s lodged opposition thereto. On consideration of the foregoing, it is

Further ordered by the Court that appellant’s aforesaid motion for release on non-financial conditions is denied.

Chief Judge BAZELON would grant the motion for release on non-financial conditions pending appeal and may file an opinion at a later date.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): NORA: RFA OH-01-007: Community-Based 
Interventions to Prevent Childhood Agricultural Injury and Disease

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting:
    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) NORA: RFA OH-01-007: Community-Based 
Interventions to Prevent Childhood Agricultural Injury and Disease.
    Times and Dates: 5 p.m.-5:30 p.m., May 15, 2001. (Open); 5:30 p.m.-
9 p.m., May 15, 2001. (Closed); 8 a.m.-5 p.m., May 16, 2001. (Closed).
    Place: State Plaza Hotel, 2117 E. State Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20037.
    Status: Portions of the meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c) (4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Deputy Director for 
Program Management, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
Program Announcement NORA: RFA OH-01-007.
    Contact Person for More Information: Gwendolyn H. Cattledge, Ph.D., 
Office of Extramural Programs, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, M/S D28, Atlanta, Georgia 
30333, telephone 404-639-2378.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 12, 2001.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 01-10057 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of Sino
Clean Energy Inc. (“the Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the
Report”), I, Caixia Peng, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Caixia Peng
              Caixia
      Peng
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Dated:
      April 15, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles S. Wiesenhart Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the condensed
consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: November 2, 2006



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Charles S. Wiesenhart Jr.
|Charles S. Wiesenhart Jr.    
|Vice President and           
|Chief Accounting Officer     
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Active Power, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Clishem, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ James A. ClishemJames A. ClishemPresident and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 28, 2008
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: FERNANDO MORALES,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-11-00077-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator is imprisoned pursuant to a determinate sentence rendered in a juvenile proceeding. 

See In re F.M., 238 S.W.3d 837, 838 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2007, pet. denied). On February 28, 2011,

he filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court either to rule or hold an

evidentiary hearing on a habeas application. Relator claimed that he filed an application for writ of

habeas corpus in the trial court in June 2010 and that the court failed on rule on the application. He

provided a copy of a habeas application, dated June 1, 2010, and a copy of a letter requesting a ruling

from the trial judge. On March 11, 2011, this Court requested that the Real Party in Interest respond

to the petition on or before April 10, 2011. We did not receive a response from the Real Party, but

we did receive a notice of appeal in which Relator sought to appeal the denial of his habeas

application. We have now received the clerk’s record for that appeal. It includes a habeas

application dated June 1, 2010, and the trial court’s order of March 24, 2011, denying the

application.

This Court “may, on affidavit or otherwise, as the court may determine, ascertain the matters

of fact that are necessary to the proper exercise of its jurisdiction.” TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN.
§ 22.220(c)(West Supp. 2010). We may also take judicial notice of the record in a related case. See

Tello v. Bank One, N.A., 218 S.W.3d 109, 113 n.4 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, no pet.). 

The record for Relator’s appeal demonstrates that Relator has received the relief requested in his

mandamus petition. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

June 15, 2011 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10154

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Adrian Warren, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-293-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Adrian Warren has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Warren has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 18, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10154 Document: 00517005034 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2023
No. 23-10154

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10154 Document: 00517005034 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 93N-0260]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Medical Device Recall Authority

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Medical Device Recall Authority'' 
has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Peggy Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  In the Federal Register of November 3, 1999 
(64 FR 59775), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0432. 
The approval expires on December 31, 2002. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: January 10, 1999.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 00-989 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F