alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7483

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus BRETT A. RODMAN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:06-CR-00170-PMD) Submitted: June 13, 2007 Decided: July 11, 2007 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. Robert Haley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Reginald I. Lloyd, United States Attorney, Rhett DeHart, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Brett A. Rodman was involuntarily committed to the custody of the Attorney General, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) (2000), based on a finding by the district court that he is incompetent to stand trial on federal criminal charges. We affirm. We review a district court’s determination that a criminal defendant is competent to stand trial for clear error. United States v. Cox , 964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir. 1992); United States v. Gastelum-Almeida , 298 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2002). As recognized by the district court, § 4241(d) establishes a two-part disjunctive test of competency: “If . . . the [district] court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his defense, the court shall commit the defendant to the custody of the Attorney General.” In the Commitment Order, the district court found that Rodman understood the nature of the proceedings against him, but also found that Rodman’s “paranoia and delusional beliefs caused by bipolar type schizoaffective disorder are so pervasive and consuming as to make him incompetent to assist in his own defense.” The court based its conclusion on the testimony of Dr. Robert Lucking, Rodman’s primary evaluator, and Rodman’s own testimony.- 3 - We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of Rodman’s competency hearing, and we find no error, let alone clear error, in the district court’s Commitment Order finding Rodman incompetent and committing him to the custody of the Attorney General. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 23.    1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statement    No. 333-124470(Form S-8)    and Registration Statement No. 133-139903 (Form S-3)    of Minrad International, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report,    dated March 29, 2007 on the consolidated financial    statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006,    appearing in this Annual Report on    Form 10-KSB    of Minrad International, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year    ended December 31, 2006.     /s/ Freed Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, PC    Buffalo, New York    March 29, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
         Floridino's International Holdings, Inc. September 30, 200 financial
         statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
         financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                        118,584
<SECURITIES>                                                  67,644
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 85,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   101,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              372,618
<PP&E>                                                        2,695,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                                406,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                3,034,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,194,507
<BONDS>                                                       1,904,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      7,757
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (82,640)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  3,024,600
<SALES>                                                       2,062,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               2,098,024
<CGS>                                                         1,582,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 1,664,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              4,067,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            544,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (1,196,677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (1,148,766)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (1,196,677)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.16)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 60 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 60

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 
Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 
             dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 
Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 
             dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Early Detection of Dyslexia in 
Children Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT BY SECRETARY OF EDUCATION ON IDENTIFICATION 
              AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA IN KINDERGARTEN 
              THROUGH THIRD GRADE.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of Education, in consultation with the 
National Academy of Sciences, shall conduct a study on methods for 
identifying and treating children with dyslexia in kindergarten through 
third grade. In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall consider--
            (1) whether there is a biological basis for dyslexia;
            (2) whether dyslexia is caused by--
                    (A) a brain-based phonological deficit that 
                prevents an individual from breaking down written words 
                into component sounds;
                    (B) post-natal experience, including inadequate 
                instruction; or
                    (C) a combination thereof; and
            (3) the cost of implementing a program on a nationwide 
        basis to identify and treat children with dyslexia in 
        kindergarten through third grade.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall prepare and 
submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study 
conducted under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gary Musselman,  the Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of
Pacel  Corp.  (the  "Company"),   certify,   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

     1. the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report)  fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 20, 2004


 /s/ Gary Musselman
----------------------------------
Gary Musselman, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,820
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,795
<PP&E>                                          61,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,414
<SALES>                                        120,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,744
<CGS>                                           71,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,342
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (554)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00157-CV

In re Edward Brogdon and Bonny Brogdon

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM MILAM COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus and request for emergency relief are denied. See

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Henson and Goodwin

Filed: March 23, 2012
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Yearly Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB of
Futomic Industries, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2004, I, Ken
Tetterington, Chief Financial Officer of Futomic Industries, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Yearly Report of Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the year
          ending December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Amendment No. 1
          Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly represents in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of Futomic Industries, Inc.


Dated:    April 14, 2005

FUTOMIC INDUSTRIES, INC.

By:  /s/ Ken Tetterington
-----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 05-23

IN RE: COURT CLOSURE ON MONDAY, JULY 3, 2023

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be 

closed on Monday, July 3, 2023.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, Monday, July 3, 2023, will be considered a day when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET.

APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: April 20, 2023 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
(86 South 69)

#### LILIENTHAL MERCANTILE CO. v. BRESLIN.

(2 Div. 715.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 24, 1920.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; B. M. Miller, Judge.

Proceeding between the Lilienthal Mercantile Company and Jud Breslin. Prom the judgment, the former appeals.

Affirmed. .

George H. Craig, of Selma, J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Lawrence E. Brown and Henry P. White, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellant.

Hugh Mallory, of Selma, R. B. Evins, of Greensboro, and Ray Rushton, J. J. Mayfield, and H. P. Crenshaw, all of Montgomery, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on the authority of Eliasberg, Bros. Mercantile Co. v. W. C. Grimes, ante, p. 492, 86 South. 56.
Fiscal Year 2021 Judiciary Meetings and Conferences That Cost More Than $100,000

Conference Name Location Start Date End Date Cost Attendees 

Funded by the 

Judiciary

Purpose and Benefits

(Courts of Appeals, District Courts and Other Judicial Services, Defenders Services, and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts)

In fiscal year 2021 the Courts of Appeals, District Courts and Other Judicial Services, Defenders Services, and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts did not hold any conferences that cost more than $100,000.

1
Fiscal Year 2021 Judiciary Meetings and Conferences That Cost More Than $100,000

(Federal Judicial Center)

Conference Name Location Start Date End Date Cost Attendees 

Funded by the 

Judiciary

Purpose and Benefits

In fiscal year 2021 the Federal Judicial Center did not hold any conferences that cost more than $100,000.

2
Fiscal Year 2021 Judiciary Meetings and Conferences That Cost More Than $100,000

(United States Sentencing Commission)

Conference Name Location Start Date End Date Cost Attendees 

Funded by the 

Judiciary

Purpose and Benefits

In fiscal year 2021 the United States Sentencing Commission did not hold any conferences that cost more than $100,000.

3
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


RULE13a-14(b)/RULE15d-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT


AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Compugen Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I the undersigned, being the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Dr. Anat Cohen-Dayag





Title:           President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:           March 21, 2011