alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") I, Emile J. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

               /s/ Emile J. Jordan
               ----------------------------------------
               Emile J. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer


DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 99.8**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCERTIFICATION(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006of Hydrogenics Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Lawrence Davis, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     By: /s/ Lawrence Davis   Name: Lawrence Davis  Title: Chief Financial Officer  Date: March 20, 2007A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toHydrogenics Corporation and will be retained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative

The filing location for your Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative, depends on where you live and if you are filing Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, at the same time (this is called “concurrent filing”).

You can file your Form I-130 online. If you choose to mail your form instead, use the table below to find the correct filing address.

**Applications and petitions that are not mailed to the appropriate filing location may experience processing delays.**

*You may request to file at the U.S. Embassy or Consulate in certain limited circumstances, as described in USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part B, Chapter 3, if you:
                - Reside outside of the United States;
                - Are a U.S. citizen; and
                - Are filing your Form I-130 for your immediate relative (your spouse, your unmarried child under the age of 21, or your parent (if you are 21 years of age or older)).

For a list of U.S. Embassies and Consulates, please consult the Department of State’s website at travel.state.gov.

03/30/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 08-07

IN RE: CHANGE IN ADMISSION FEE TO JOIN BAR OF THE COURT

O R D E R

 Miscellaneous Order No. 07-07 is hereby revoked.

DATED: March 13, 2007 FOR THE COURT:

NORMAN Y. HERRING

Clerk of the Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Denise Dattorre, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered April 21, 1986, convicting her of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez, 47*NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 05-15

IN RE: COURT CLOSED ON FRIDAY, JULY 3, 2015.

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be

closed on Friday, July 3, 2015.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and

Procedure, Friday, July 3, 2015, will be considered a day when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET.

APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: July 1, 2015 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-57376 of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC on Form S-3 of our report dated
March 1, 2002, (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's change in method of accounting
for derivative instruments to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 133 described in Note 2) appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2001.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 28, 2002
# Community-Based Organizations

Does your community-based organization know how individuals can avoid and report immigration services scams? Have immigrants in your community been scammed?

The links below are tools that your organization can use to assist people who are seeking assistance with their USCIS petitions or applications:
                - Become an organization recognized by the Office of Legal Access Program (OLAP).
                - Report immigration services scams in your state. Most reporting mechanisms allow you to report anonymously. If people in your community are being victimized by an immigration services scams, you can report it on their behalf
                - Identify consumer protection and unauthorized practice of law statutes by state. Understanding the laws will better help you educate and empower the immigrant community you serve.
                - Provide individuals with the resources they need to avoid immigration services scams. Spread the word about this pervasive issue. Educate your community.

Support the Avoid Scams initiative:
                - Refer clients/potential applicants to the  Avoid Scams Resource Center
                - Include a link from your organization’s website to the Avoid Scams Resource Center
                - Place the Avoid Scams brochure in your organization's offices, waiting areas, windows, community-events spaces and other visible areas
                - Pass out copies of the Avoid Scams brochure when meeting with potential applicants or at community functions
                - Encourage your organization to sign up for the Avoid Scams Resource Center RSS feed

USCIS also hosts local events across the country. Visit our Outreach section to learn about events in your area.

07/10/2019

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 09/09-5279]

Notice is hereby given that Asian American Capital Corporation, located at 1251 West Tennyson Road, Suite 4, Hayward, California 94544, has surrendered its license to operate as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (the Act). Asian American Capital Corporation was licensed by the Small Business Administration on February 23, 1981. 

Under the authority vested by the Act and pursuant to the Regulations promulgated thereunder, the surrender was acted on this date, and accordingly, all rights, privileges and franchises derived therefrom have been terminated. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.11, Small Business Investment Companies) 

Dated: April 17, 2001.

Harry E. Haskins, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Investment. 

[FR Doc. 01-10097 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,224,846
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,316,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,452
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,975)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (105,844)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (105,844)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Ixia pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act,

as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Bethany Mayer, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ixia; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 17, 2017 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Bethany Mayer                                  
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Bethany Mayer
President and Chief Executive Officer
1990

Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure 

Robert E. Keeton, Chairman 

Thomas E. Baker 

Sarah Evans Barker 

William Bertelsman 

T. S. Ellis, III 

Gael Mahony 

Edwin J. Peterson 

George C. Pratt 

Dolores K. Sloviter 

Charles E. Wiggins 

William R. Wilson 

Charles Alan Wright 

Daniel R. Coquillette, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules

Kenneth F. Ripple, Chairman 

Danny J. Boggs 

Donald F. Froeb 

E. Grady Jolly 

James K. Logan 

Arthur A. McGiverin 

William H. Mulligan 

Kenneth W. Starr 

Stephen F. Williams 

Carol Ann Mooney, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules

Edward Leavy, Chairman 

James J. Barta 

Harry D. Dixon 

Malcolm J. Howard 

Edith Hollan Jones 

Lawrence P. King 

Ralph R. Mabey 

Paul Mannes 

Joseph L. McGlynn, Jr. 

James W. Meyers 

Herbert P. Minkel, Jr. 

Harold L. Murphy 

Joseph Patchan 
Bernard Shapiro 

Alan N. Resnick, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

Sam C. Pointer, Jr. Chairman 

Wayne D. Brazil 

Larrine S. Holbrooke 

Dennis G. Linder 

Arthur R. Miller 

Mark A. Nordenberg 

Mariana R. Pfaelzer 

James Dickson Phillips, Jr. 

James Powers 

Joseph E. Stevens, Jr. 

Ralph K. Winter, Jr. 

Michael D. Zimmerman 

Paul D. Carrington, Reporter 

Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules

Wm. Terrell Hodges, Chairman 

Sam Crow 

James DeAnda 

John Doar 

Robinson O. Everett 

Daniel H. Huyett, 

Tom Karas 

John F. Keenan 

Edward F. Marek 

Robert S. Mueller, III 

Stephen A. Saltzburg 

Harvey E. Schlesinger 

David A. Schlueter, Reporter
# Trabajadores permanentes

**AVISO:** El 22 de marzo de 2023, el Departamento de Estado publicó el Boletín de Visas de abril de 2023, así como una Notificación del Registro Federal que explica ciertos cambios a las Fechas de Acción Final y las Fechas de Presentación de la Categoría de Visa de Inmigrante de Cuarta Preferencia Basada en el Empleo.

Cada año fiscal hay aproximadamente 140,000 visas de inmigrantes para extranjeros (y sus cónyuges e hijos) que tengan la intención de inmigrar basándose en sus destrezas para ocupar empleos. Si usted tiene la combinación adecuada de destrezas, educación y/o experiencia y es elegible teniendo en cuenta otros aspectos, usted podría vivir permanentemente en los Estados Unidos. A continuación se presenta una lista de las cinco preferencias (categorías) de visas de inmigrante basándose en el empleo.

## Visas Basadas en el Empleo

Estamos priorizando los esfuerzos para garantizar que usemos tantas visas basadas en el empleo (PDF, 1015.52 KB) disponibles como sea posible este año fiscal.

**También instamos a cualquier persona que pueda ser eligible para un ajuste de estatus basado en el empleo a presentar su solicitud de ajuste de estatus acompañada del Formulario I-693, Informe de Examen Médico y Registro de Vacunación, lo antes posible.**

En el año fiscal 2021, un número inusualmente alto de visas de inmigrante basadas en el empleo estuvieron disponibles. A pesar de las restricciones de capacidad relacionadas con la pandemia, USCIS pudo aumentar el procesamiento y aprobar más de 175,000 solicitudes de ajuste de estatus basadas en el empleo. Si bien este fue un aumento de más del 50% por encima de nuestra carga de trabajo típica, 65,000 números de visas disponibles basadas en el empleo permanecieron sin usar al final del año fiscal 2021. Ya hemos tomado una serie de medidas este año fiscal para ayudar a garantizar que las futuras asignaciones de visas de inmigrante no se queden parcialmente sin usar (PDF, 1015.52 KB).

## Certificación laboral

Algunas preferencias de visa requieren que ya usted tenga una oferta de empleo de un empleador de los EE.UU. Este empleador será considerado como su patrocinador. Para algunas categorías de visa es necesario que antes de que el empleador de los EE.UU. pueda presentar una petición a USCIS, tiene que obtener una certificación laboral aprobada del Departamento del Trabajo de los EE.UU. (DOL, por su sigla en inglés). La certificación laboral del DOL constata lo siguiente:
                - No hay suficientes trabajadores de los EE.UU. disponibles, calificados y dispuestos para ocupar la posición que se ofrece con el salario actual
                - Contratar a un trabajador extranjero no incidirá de manera negativa en los salarios y las condiciones de trabajo de los trabajadores de los EE.UU. con empleos similares.

Para más información, vea el enlace “Certificación laboral”.

## Categorías de preferencia de visa de trabajador permanente

05/26/2022

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
**Exhibit 10.18****CANEUM, INC.****AMENDMENT NO. 2****TO****CONSULTING AGREEMENT**This Second Amendment (the “**Amendment**”), entered into this 23rd day of April 2007,is to the Consulting Agreement effective December 31, 2006, as amended April 4, 2007, (the"**Agreement**”) by and between Caneum, Inc. United States (“**Caneum**”) and Burdock Inc., a Saint Vincent& the Grenadines company (“**Consultant**”).RECITALS:WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the compensation arrangements under the Agreement; andWHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein;NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to §15 of the Agreement, the parties hereto mutually agree to amendthe Agreement as follows:1. Amendment to Stock Signing Bonus. Paragraph (i) of §8.2 is hereby eliminated inits entirety.2. Remainder of Agreement. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue tobe, and shall remain, in full force and effect. Except as provided herein, this Amendment shallnot be deemed (i) to be a waiver of, or consent to, or a modification or amendment of, any otherterm or condition of the Agreement or (ii) to prejudice any right or rights which Caneum may nowhave or may have in the future under or in connection with the Agreement or any of the instrumentsor agreements referred to therein, as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwisemodified from time to time.3. Incorporation by Reference. The terms of the Agreement are incorporated herein byreference and shall form a part of this Amendment as if set forth herein in their entirety.
 
 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment the respective dayand year set forth below to be effective as of the day and year first written above.     CANEUM:CANEUM, INC.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7205

JAMES CLINTON FORMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN OF GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-555-7) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Clinton Forman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:James Clinton Forman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denyleave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Forman v. Warden , No. CA-00-555-7 (W.D. Va. July 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Lawal Mohammed, Petitioner, v Eugene S. LeFevre, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Kane, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR *947article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review two determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks to review two prison disciplinary determinations finding him guilty of violating prison rules. The first determination found petitioner guilty of violating prison rules by refusing to obey a direct order. According to the misbehavior report prepared by Correction Officer Lee Emery, at 12:05 a.m., on September 21, 1986 Emery ordered petitioner to either shut the music off that was coming from his cell or use headphones. Ten minutes later, when petitioner was again approached by Emery about the loud music, petitioner responded by swearing and turning up the volume of the music. At the hearing, petitioner maintained that this was a case of mistaken identity. In this regard, a fellow inmate testified that petitioner did not own a "box” or radio. Emery, however, testified at the hearing and positively identified petitioner as the inmate who disobeyed his direct order.

The second disposition at issue found petitioner guilty of violating prison rules by being out of place and by disturbing the order of the facility. According to the misbehavior report written by Correction Officer Ernest Blaise, on October 1, 1986 Blaise found petitioner with a pass for a location different from where petitioner was found. Moreover, according to the misbehavior report, when Blaise asked petitioner what he was doing in an unauthorized area, petitioner became loud and created a disturbance. At the ensuing hearing, petitioner admitted that he was out of place, but explained that since he was relatively new at the institution, he was unfamiliar with the prison layout.

The misbehavior report and testimony of Emery and the misbehavior report of Blaise provide substantial evidence to support the determinations under review *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130; *Matter of Vogelsang v Coombe,*105 AD2d 913, *affd*66 NY2d 835). In addition, contrary to petitioner’s contention, the first hearing complied with all due process requirements.

The petition also appears to seek relief concerning the refusal on two occasions to allow petitioner to attend Jumu’ah services. Petitioner, however, fails to develop this issue on the record and, accordingly, is not entitled to relief. In any event, respondent has attached documents to his brief which demonstrate that petitioner was denied permission to attend services *948on October 17, 1986 and November 7, 1986 for reasons of institutional order and security. However, we note that on other occasions, petitioner was granted permission to attend religious services. The petition should be dismissed.

Determinations confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Casey and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.