alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF 

### -IWE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 

# 910

# 911

*The Pamilt, of the el*ottvn &hew*4 e w aa$a?lty in ravor Al' ralring tho tu Fate !#rca? $1.00 to &25. "Xt IO sw oonkntion that Se E. 80. 362 vali

### doted that el8otlaa. BothL)eo. 1 and 2 OI 5. 75. 

### lo. IW soem pl&ln aou@ te w that tho above lb Oti@Kt

N ë?8li & ìTh o r 0

1 * D o 6 o n s #emtl o n

ever t h i s ~l a eue,

u a l y t hetimut ee a

o f tha Ant o n l hde p a b u rc Bl*t r l e t ~ttebeoure,aadXtUnkanoplnlonfmamyeu Lo All t h a t

i o n o a o o * o r y.* I‘ . 

# 912

~brefon, oinoa ltr oreathn, uid 

### #ohool dlrtrfethaa operated under the ciemarrlZ*wr of ‘ hxao %nsofar aa tetlau and shotion tbezwfor eav 

### oonaorned~

# 913

Sootian UOS u5.dAntpro+i408a

# 91

'A rrli(irt* or owtioo statute is on0 6u- *oka xor

## 915



# Road Dlatrlotx0. 0 VaF9ual-a 116 SO6 8. W. lO62$ Tam Oroon Co& Y. 

# Tax* 547, Tu. 200, 800 4,.

01. Ikwd~, 116 S6l,

# 9.16

Rc4wv*r, on aQtiQn ror rohow5ag in thl8 1Q* u80, )17&W. (2)780,J*o &pwP8ktw t!bM 8lamo

# 917

# 91.8
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. Douglas Chaffin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ H. Douglas ChaffinH. Douglas ChaffinChief Executive OfficerMarch 18, 2011
Order entered January 27, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01520

- CV

JOHNNY WIMBREY, WIMB REY GLOBAL INC., WIM BREY TRAINING SYSTEM
, WIMBREY WORLDWIDE MI NISTRIE S, ROYAL SUCCESS CLU B LLC, AND ROYAL LIFE, Appellant s

V.

WORLDVENTURES MARKET ING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 429

- 06212

- 2019



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants ’ January 24 , 2020 unopp osed second mo tion for extension

of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants ’ br ief due by

February 1 8 , 2020.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-27-1999             MAR-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998             SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                           3,184                   3,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,713                  47,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,900                   1,900
<INVENTORY>                                     44,456                  44,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,846                  98,846
<PP&E>                                          26,393                  26,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,318                  10,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,578                 172,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,477                  50,477
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          6                       6
<COMMON>                                           102                     102
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,578                 172,578
<SALES>                                        148,038                  79,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,038                  79,401
<CGS>                                          100,037                  53,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,213                  19,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,844                     963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,944                   5,632
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,938                   2,231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,006                   3,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,006                   3,401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57                    0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54                    0.31
        

</TABLE>
SECOND DI VI SI ON
A NDREWS, P. J.

, M C F A D DEN and RA

Y, JJ.

N O T IC E : M otions for r e c ons i de r a tion m us t be ph y sic a l ly r e ce iv ed i n our c le r k ’s offic e w ithin te n da y s of the da te of de c is ion to be de e m ed tim e ly file d.

http://w w w .ga a ppe a l s .us /r ule s

M ar ch 22, 2016



# I n th e Co u r t o f

A p p eals o f

G eo r g ia

A1 4 A0 97 9 . SHIRLEY v . THE STATE.

R A Y , J u d g e.

In S hi r l ey v. S t a te

, 3 3 0 Ga. Ap p. 4 2 4 ( 7 6 5 SE2 d 4 9 1 ) (2 0 1 4 ), t h i s Co u rt

affi rm ed t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s ord er d en y i n g M i ch ael Sco t t Sh i rl ey ’ s m o t i o n t o s u p p res s

ev i d en ce rel at ed t o i m ag es o f ch i ld p o rn og rap h y s ei zed fro m h is h o m e, fi n d i n g t h at

t h e ap p li cat i o n fo r a s earch warran t was su p p o rt ed b y p ro b ab l e cau s e. In S h i r l ey v.

S t a t e , 2 9 7 Ga. 7 22 (7 7 7 SE2 d 4 4 4 ) (2 0 1 5 ), t h e Su p rem e Co u rt rev ers ed

, d et erm i n i n g

t h at th e w arran t ap p l i c a t i o n was i n s u ffi ci en t to s up p o rt p ro b ab l e cau se an d t h at

Sh i rl ey ’ s m o t i o n t o s u pp res s s h o u l d h av e b een g ran t ed

. Acco rd in g ly

, we v acat e o u r

e a r l i e r o p i n i o n , ad o pt t he Su p rem e Co urt ’ s o p i n i o n as o u r o wn , an d rev ers e t h e

ju d g m en t o f t h e t ri al co u rt

.

Ju d g men t r ever sed . An d r ews , P. J., a n d McFa d

d en , J., co n cu r

.
# Materiales Educativos para Educadores y Administradores de Programas

USCIS ha desarrollado una variedad de materiales para ayudar a los **educadores** a complementar la instrucción en el salón de clases con el fin de preparar a sus estudiantes para el proceso de naturalización y el examen de inglés y civismo.

Los **administradores del programa** pueden usar los recursos que se encuentran en esta sección para mejorar la educación en ciudadanía para adultos y los programas de inglés como segundo idioma. Las organizaciones comunitarias, con base religiosa y cívicas, así como empleadores que desean ayudar a los inmigrantes a adaptarse a la vida en Estados Unidos y prepararse para la ciudadanía también pueden encontrar recursos útiles para apoyar sus iniciativas.

Visite la página **Estudie para el Examen (versión 2008)** para encontrar materiales para el examen de inglés y  examen de educación cívica de 2008, que se utilizarán como parte de los recursos de su salón de clases. Cualquiera de estos recursos también puede servir como herramientas de estudio individual.

Visite la página **Estudie para el Examen (versión 2020)** para encontrar materiales para el examen de educación cívica de 2020.

Visite la tienda de libros del Gobierno de EE. UU. para comprar materiales y publicaciones de USCIS.

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
ex105.htm


EXHIBIT 10.5


April [__], 2010












Bank of America, N.A.


777 Main Street


Hartford, Connecticut 06115




_______________________


_______________________


_______________________




 


           Re:  Amendment of Subordinated Note







Ladies and Gentlemen:







Reference is made to (a) the Second Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note dated April 5, 2005 in the original principal amount of $4,700,000 (the “Subordinated Note”) made by Vermont Pure Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) and payable to the order of ________ (the “Payee”), which Subordinated Note was collaterally assigned by the Payee to Bank of America, N.A. (the “Bank”) by the Allonge Endorsement to Second Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note executed by the Payee, which Allonge Endorsement was dated April 5, 2005, and (b) the Subordination and Pledge Agreement dated as of April 5, 2005 (the “Subordination Agreement”) that is referred to in the Subordinated Note.  Capitalized terms used herein that are not defined herein have the meanings given to such terms in the Subordinated Note or the Subordination Agreement, as applicable.







In connection with the amendment and restatement of the Credit Agreement and the amendment of the Subordination Agreement as of the date hereof, Holdings, the Payee, and the Bank have agreed, and do hereby agree, that by this agreement the Subordinated Note is hereby amended by deleting “October 5, 2012” from clause (iii) of the third paragraph of the Subordinated Note and by substituting therefor the words “October 5, 2015”.







Except as otherwise expressly provided by this agreement, all of the respective terms and provisions of the Subordinated Note shall remain the same.  The Subordinated Note, as amended hereby, shall continue in full force and effect, and this agreement and the Subordinated Note shall be read and construed as one instrument.


 


This agreement is intended to take effect under, and shall be construed according to and governed by, the internal laws of the State of Connecticut (without reference to principles of conflicts or choice of law).  This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one instrument.  A facsimile or other electronic transmission of an executed counterpart shall have the same effect as the original executed counterpart.







Very truly yours,







Vermont Pure Holdings, Ltd.












By______________________


Name:  Peter K. Baker


Title:    Chief Executive Officer












Agreed to:












 


Bank of America, N.A.


 


By______________________


Name: Christopher T. Phelan


Title: Senior Vice President
































 


[Signature Page regarding Amendment of Subordinated Note dated April 5, 2005 executed by


Vermont Pure Holdings, Ltd. payable to __________ and endorsed to Bank of America, N.A.]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
EOP Operating Limited Partnership (the Company), each hereby certifies that
to his / her knowledge, on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2003
    
    /S/ RICHARD D. KINCAIDRichard D. KincaidPresident and
Chief Executive Officer of
Equity Office Properties Trust,
the general partner of EOP
Operating Limited PartnershipDate: November 14, 2003
    
    /S/ MARSHA C. WILLIAMSMarsha C. WilliamsExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Equity Office Properties Trust,
the general partner of EOP
Operating Limited Partnership
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 16 , 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00592

- CR

GREGORY HICKMON , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1235748

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A ppellant entered a guilty plea to the offense of burglary of a habitation. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and sentenced appellant on February 9, 2009, to three years’ deferred adjudication community supervision. The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate appellant’s guilt. In accordance with a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on May 26, 2011
, to two years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas2

Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until July 13, 2016

. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex . R. App.
P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction.
Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal i s not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Pa nel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Christopher

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 10.12
 Compensation of Named Executive Officers and Chief Executive Officer for 2008
  Executive Officer
    
    Annual Base SalaryAtul Bhatnagar(1)
    
    $
    390,000President and Chief Executive OfficerErrol Ginsberg
    
    
    375,000Chief Innovation Officer 
and Former Chief Executive OfficerThomas B. Miller
    
    
    262,500Chief Financial OfficerVictor Alston
    
    
    262,500Senior Vice President, Product DevelopmentRonald W. Buckly
    
    
    262,500Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs 
and General CounselWalker H. Colston, III
    
    
    250,000Vice President, Engineering Operations
 
 (1)
    
    Mr. Bhatnagar became the Companys President and Chief Operating Officer in September 2007
and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since March 2008.  (i)
    
    The Companys bonus plans for its executive officers;(ii)
    
    The Companys Amended and Restated 1997 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-117969) filed with the Commission on
August 5, 2004);(iii)
    
    The Companys 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-31523) filed with the Commission on June 3,
2008); and(iv)
    
    The Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 1 to
the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-42678) filed with the Commission on
September 5, 2000), as amended by (1) Amendment No. 1 thereto (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the
Companys Registration Statement Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-107818) filed with the Commission on August
8, 2003), and (2) the Supplemental Provisions thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K (File. No. 000-31523) filed with the Commission on April 20, 2006).
Motion Granted; Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 12 , 2022

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00321

- CR

RAYMOND MIRELES , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas Tria l C ourt Cause No. 1627845

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child
between t he age of fourteen and seventeen. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly friv olo us and without merit. The
bri ef meets the requirements of Anders v. Cali fornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by assigning issues that might arguably support the appeal , and explaining why those issues do not raise arguable error

. See Gai nous v. State , 436 S.W.2 d 1 37 , 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969 ).2

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivere d to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of th is date, more than 60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

W e have carefully reviewe d the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversibl e error in
the record. We a re not to addres s the merits of each claim ra ised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

T he judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

P ER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Poissant and Wilson

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2( b).
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6093 

To ensure the continuation of certain security activities of the United States 

Capitol Police. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 10, 2010 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. CAPUANO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To ensure the continuation of certain security activities of 

the United States Capitol Police. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RATIFICATION OF USE OF CERTAIN APPRO4 PRIATIONS BY CAPITOL POLICE FOR TRUCK 

5 INTERDICTION MONITORING PROGRAM. 

6 Notwithstanding section 1018(d) of the Legislative 

7 Branch Appropriations Act, 2003 (2 U.S.C. 1907(d)), the 

8 use of any funds appropriated to the United States Capitol 

9 Police during fiscal year 2003 for transfer relating to the 

10 Truck Interdiction Monitoring Program to the working 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6093 IH

1 capital fund established under section 328 of title 49, 

2 United States Code, is ratified. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 25, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-10077 Filed 4-19-01; 11:23 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906

OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A forthe year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The foregoingcertification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subjectto liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expresslyincorporated by reference in any such filing.
| Dated: April 3, 2007 | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                 | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.     |   |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer   |   |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by 18 U.S.C Section 1350 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6047 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6047

               To improve airport screening and security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To improve airport screening and security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guaranteeing Airport Physical 
Screening Standards Act''.

SEC. 2. SECURED AREAS OF AIRPORTS.

    (a) Implementation of Improved Airport Perimeter Access Security.--
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security 
Administration) shall issue regulations, directives, or other 
appropriate measures to implement the requirements of section 
44903(h)(4) of title 49, United States Code.
    (b) Airport Security Plans.--The Assistant Secretary shall set a 
schedule for requiring airports to update their airport security plans 
to comply with the requirements of section 44903(h)(4) not later than 3 
years after the issuance of the regulations, directives, or other 
measures required under subsection (a).

SEC. 3. HIRING OF SCREENERS.

    (a) Number of Screeners.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary of Homeland Security may hire the number of 
passenger and baggage screeners that the Secretary determines necessary 
to ensure aviation security.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```