alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
AND CCC SURETY OPERATIONS EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED
NOTES AND SCHEDULES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           433,664
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      26,471
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 525,893
<CASH>                                           8,422
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              87,463
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          88,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 900,676
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                162,948
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            202,589
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                101,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           441
<OTHER-SE>                                     337,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   900,676
<PREMIUMS>                                      75,687
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              7,201
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 (4)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      13,572
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     32,544
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            12,264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### TOOKER et al., Respondents, v. BOOTH, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 17, 1894.)

Action by Joseph H. Tooker and others against Marion Booth.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                             CALAIS RESOURCES, INC.

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                          Principal Financial Officer

         To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended February 29, 2004, containing financial statements for the period then
ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Calais Resources, Inc. for the periods presented.

April 13, 2004

/s/ Matthew C. Witt
----------------------------------------
Matthew C. Witt, Chief Financial Officer
# Genealogical Records Help

## Genealogy Requests

                - Order Online  or by  Mail
                - Need Help Navigating Our Online Request System?
                - Does My Request Qualify?
                - How to Make a Case Status Request?
                - Request Status

## Frequently Asked Questions About

                - Genealogy FAQ
                - Record Requests FAQ
                - Request Status FAQ
                - Searching the Index FAQ

## More Help and Resources

                - Sample File Numbers
                - Do You Have a File Number?
                - Avoid Common Errors
                - What About USCIS Records Not Available Through the Genealogy Program?
                - Genealogical Records Contact Us

12/23/2019

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### In the Matter of Robert E. Sullivan, Petitioner, v Edward V. Regan, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

— Casey, J. P.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a surveyor employed by the Department of Transportation, injured his back when he slipped on an icy curb while performing a survey. Respondent denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits, concluding that petitioner’s slip on the icy curb while performing his normal duties as a surveyor was not an accident. The determination must be annulled on constraint of *Matter of McCambridge v McGuire*(62 NY2d 563; *see also, Matter of Pratt v Regan,*68 NY2d 746).

Respondent concluded that since petitioner’s normal duties as a surveyor required him to traverse a wide variety of terrain in various weather conditions, the slip on an icy curb was a foreseeable risk inherent in the work performed. In the *McCambridge*case, however, one of the petitioners, a police patrolman, slipped and fell on wet pavement as he was about to enter his patrol car, and the Court of Appeals held this to be an accident as a matter of law *(supra,*at 568). In holding this slip and fall to be sudden, unexpected and out of the ordinary, the court cited *Matter of Covel v New York State Employees’ Retirement Sys.*(84 AD2d 902, *lv denied*55 NY2d 606) as a contrasting case where the slip on a wet surface was a risk of the work performed. In *Covel,*the petitioner, a school custodian, slipped while dust-mopping a floor which he previously had oiled. Another case in which the court distinguished between a risk of the work performed and a sudden, unexpected event is *Matter of Pratt v Regan*(68 NY2d 746, *supra),*where a fireman caught his heel on the running board of the fire truck he was exiting, lost his balance and came down hard *994on his other foot in a pothole. The court reasoned that "catching a heel on a running board and thus losing balance may be a risk of the work performed, but coming down hard upon the other foot in a pothole is not” *(supra,*at 747).

Here, as in both the *McCambridge*and *Pratt*cases, petitioner’s injury occurred when in the course of his normal duties he stepped on a hazardous condition, the existence of which was totally unrelated to his employment. Thus, petitioner sustained an accidental injury as a matter of law since it resulted from a sudden, unexpected event *(see, Matter of Pratt v Regan, supra; Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, supra; Matter of Boudreau v Regan,*129 AD2d 846).

Determination annulled, with costs, petition granted and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
(8 Misc. Rep. 268.)

#### SOMMER v. BAVARIAN STAR BREWING CO.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

March, 1894.)

Landlord and Tenant—Estoppel to Dent Landlord’s Title.

In an action by a lessor against his lessee for rent, defendant is precluded, by the doctrine of estoppel to deny landlord’s title, from contending that plaintiff had only a dower interest in the premises, and that it was not such as to entitle her to sue for rent.

Appeal from special term.

Action by Sebastian Sommer, as administrator, against the Bavarian Star Brewing Company, for rent. From a judgment of. the special term (26 N. Y. Supp. 865) overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BISCHOFF, PRYOR, and GIEGERICH, JJ.

George H. Yeaman, for appellant.

Jacob F. Miller, for respondent.

PRYOR, J.

The position that the complaint discloses a defect of parties is manifestly untenable. The allegation that the interests of the other lessors had been transferred to the defendant left but the two parties in controversy,—plaintiff and defendant It was no more necessary to join the transferrers in the action than to unite any assignor with the assignee in an action on the assigned claim. Apparently, all the parties affected are before the court; and that is enough, against the demurrer. Estoppel out of the way, we are of opinion that, as a suit for rent upon a demise of a dower interest, the action is not to be upheld. Only by implication does it appear by the complaint that plaintiff’s intestate had a dower interest in the premises; thus, that they were let and conveyed "subject to the dower right of Diadema Sommer.” Whether her right "was inchoate or consummate is not to be collected from the pleadings; and if inchoate, only, her interest was incapable of assignment. In Insurance Co. v. Shipman, 119 N. Y. 324, 24 N. E. 177; Pope v. Mead, 99 N. Y. 201, 1 N. E. 671; and Payne v. Becker, 87 N. Y. 153,—the right was consummate. But here it is not apparent that the husband does not still live; and, if so, the intestate had nothing to demise. Ex vi termini, a lease imports a thing let; and a subject-matter susceptible of grant, no less than capable parties, is indispensable to a demise. . 1 Bouv. Inst. § 1780. The statement in the complaint is an insufficient allegation of interest in the intestate. Clark v. Dillon, 97 N. Y. 370; Valentine v. Lunt, 115 N. Y. 496, 501, 22 N. E. 209. Nevertheless, the action being upon a lease under seal, with a covenant for quiet enjoyment, and by lessor against lessee, for the recovery of rent, the defendant is precluded, by the familiar estoppel, from challenging plaintiff’s title. Mayor, etc., v. Sonneborn, 113 N. Y. 423, 21 N. E. 121; McAdam, Landl. & T. 422. As the action may be maintained for some rent, the demurrer is untenable. The question of the proportion of rent to which the intestate was entitled is not now for determination. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Leave to plead over on payment of costs.
EX-10.11 Power of Attorney





 Exhibit 10.11 

Power of Attorney 
 I, Sufen LING, a
Chinese citizen whose ID card number is [            ], am a shareholder holding 5% equity (My Equity) in Shanghai Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co., Ltd. For my equity, I
hereby irrevocably authorize CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. to exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 

CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. is authorized to act as my sole and exclusive agent to exercise the rights with respect of the matters related
to my equity, including but not limited to: (i) to attend the shareholders’ meeting of Shanghai Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co., Ltd.; (ii) to exercise all the shareholders’ rights and voting rights that I have in accordance
with the laws of China and the Articles of Association of Shanghai Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co., Ltd., including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or disposal of all or any part of my equity; and (iii) as my
authorized representative, to designate and appoint the Legal Representative, Board Chairman, Executive Directors, Directors, Supervisors, General Manager and other senior management members of Shanghai Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co.,
Ltd. 
 CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. will have the rights to sign the transfer contract agreed in the Exclusive Purchase Right Contract
(to which I am a contracting party as required) on my behalf within the scope of authorization, and perform the Equity Pledge Contract and the Exclusive Purchase Right Contract executed by me as a party thereto and the instruments, documents or
provisions amending, supplementing, substituting and / or restating the same from time to time. The exercise of these rights will not limit this Power of Attorney. 

All acts of CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. in respect of my equity are deemed to be my acts, and all documents signed by it are deemed to be
signed by me and will be recognized by me. 
 CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. has the right to
re-entrust any other person or entity to handle the aforesaid matters without giving me a prior notice or obtain my prior consent. 

This Power of Attorney shall be irrevocable and continue to be valid as of the date of signing of the Power of Attorney while I am a shareholder of Shanghai
Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co., Ltd. 
 During the term of this Power of Attorney, I hereby waive all rights relating to my equity which have
been authorized to CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. through this Power of Attorney, and I shall not exercise such rights on my own. 
  

	
	Sufen LING
	
	/s/ Sufen Ling
	Date: January 23, 2018
#### DOUGHERTY *v.*NEVADA BANK.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 98.

Argued and submitted December 6, 1895.

Decided December 9, 1895.

*Wood*v. *Brady,*150 U. S. 18, affirmed and applied to this case.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error to foreclose a municipal-tax or street assessment lien. In a brief filed for defendant in error it was stated that the judgment here sought to be reversed involved the validity of precisely similar extensions to' those sought to be reversed in *Wood*v. *Brady,*150 U. S. 18, and under the same statute. This statement was not denied or challenged by the counsel for the plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. O. Bates*for plaintiff in error submitted on his brief.

*Mr. James G. Maguire*for defendant in error.

*Mr. John Garber, Mr. John H. Boalt,*and *Mr. Thomas B. Bishop*filed a brief for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Field :

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of *Wood*v. *Brady,*150 U. S. 18.

*Writ dismissed.*
# Índice A-Z

Utilice esta lista para localizar contenido relevante. El símbolo “#” incluye enlaces a contenido que comienza con un número. Por favor envíe un mensaje al Administrador del sitio web para sugerir otros términos.

Accesibilidad

Adopciones

Ajuste de estatus

AR-11

Asilo

Aviso de apelación de decisión bajo las secciones 245A o 210 de la Ley de inmigración y nacionalidad

Aviso de apelación o moción

Aviso de Cambio de Domicilio del Patrocinador
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9604]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0089]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C., 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Veterans 
Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, has 
submitted the collection of information abstracted below to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA 
submission describes the nature of the information collection and its 
expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection 
instrument.

DATE: Comments must be submitted on or before May 18, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Denise 
McLamb, Information Management Service (045A4), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8030 
or FAX (202) 273-5981. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0089.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Statement of Dependency of Parent(s), VA Form 21-509.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0089.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: 38 U.S.C 102 requires that income and dependency must be 
determined before benefits may be paid to or for a dependent parent. VA 
Form 21-509 is used to gather the necessary information from the 
applicant to make this determination.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on December 2, 1999, on page 67629.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 20,000 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Generally one time.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 40,000.
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
12035, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. Please refer to ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0089'' in any correspondence.

    Dated: March 27, 2000.
    By direction of the Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 00-9604 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-KSB/A2"), I,
Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-KSB/A2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A2 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 10, 2004
/s/ Andrew P. Calerich
----------------------
Andrew P. Calerich
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 24.2
POWER OF ATTORNEY
     The undersigned, a director of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., herebyconstitutes and appoints Stephen J. Tomassi and Gregory D. Waller, or either ofthem, his true and lawful attorneys and agents, each with full power andauthority to act as such without the other, to do any and all acts and thingsand to execute any and all instruments which either one of said attorneys andagents may deem necessary or advisable to enable said Corporation to complywith the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), as amended; and includingspecifically, but without limitation of the foregoing, full power and authorityto each of said attorneys and agents to sign the name of the undersigned to theForm 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, and anyamendment(s) thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to the requirements of the Act, the undersigned hereby ratifying andconfirming all that said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and delivered thesepresents as of the 15th day of December 2003.     /s/ ROBERT W. KLEMMERobert W. Klemme
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Central, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Doyal
G. Bryant President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                    /s/ Doyal G. Bryant
                                               -----------------------------
                                                      Doyal G. Bryant
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

January 14, 2005
----

**EXHIBIT      32-2**

**CERTIFICATE      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                 Harel Goldstein                                                                           |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Harel                Goldstein Director                and Chief Financial OfficerNovember                29, 2006 |   |

----