alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Valentino Anderson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered on May 13, 1985, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sullivan, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatiory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP96-312-050]

Take notice that on April 17, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), tendered for fiing an Errata Letter Filing in the above-referenced docket.

Tennessee states that the Errata Letter Filing contains a complete copy of a Gas Transportation Agreement between Tennessee and Virginia Power Energy Marketing, Inc. (VEPCO) puruant to Tennessee's Rate Schedule FT-A (FT-A Service Agreement). Tennessee further states that the copy of the FT-A Service Agreement that was filed on April 11, 2001 in this docket unadvertently omitted certain pages of the agreement.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with § 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with § 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at  http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-10320  Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

PARKERVISION, INC., Appellant

v.

TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., LG ELECTRONICS INC., Appellees

______________________

2023

- 1417

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021

- 00985, IPR2022

- 00246.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J ASON S COTT C HARKOW

, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by R ONALD M.

D AIGNAULT

, C HANDRAN I YER

.

E DWARD J OHN M AYLE

, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Denver, CO, argued for appellees. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. also represented by K RISTOPHER L.

R EED , Dallas, TX. Case: 23-1417 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/2024D AVID S. C HUN , Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, for LG Electronics Inc. Also represented by S TEVEN P EPE

, M ATTHEW R. S HAPIRO , New York, NY; S COTT S. T AYL OR

, Boston, MA.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, T ARANTO

, and C HEN

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 5 , 2024

Date Case: 23-1417 Document: 52 Page: 2 Filed: 06/05/2024
EXHIBIT 23.1




Richardson & Company                                550 Howe Avenue, Suite 210
                                                    Sacramento, California 95825

                                                    Telephone:    (916) 564-8727
                                                    FAX:          (916) 564-8728



                         CONSENT OF RICHARDSON & COMPANY


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8) (SEC File Number 333-62294) pertaining to the Sonoma Valley Bancorp's
1996 Stock Option Plan as amended in April 1999 and the  Registration  Statement
(Form S-8) (SEC File Number 333-88610) pertaining to the Sonoma Valley Bancorp's
2002 Equity  Incentive Plan of our report dated January 25, 2005 with respect to
the  consolidated  financial  statements of Sonoma Valley Bancorp and Subsidiary
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December 31, 2004,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                       /s/ Richardson & Company
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Richardson & Company


Sacramento, California
March 25, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TROPICAL SPORTSWEAR FOR THE THIRTY-NINE
WEEKS ENDED JULY 3, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                           2,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,522
<INVENTORY>                                     84,402
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,648
<PP&E>                                          50,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 308,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,472
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   308,236
<SALES>                                        315,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,439
<CGS>                                          227,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                72,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,607
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors of


China Natural Gas, Inc.





We consent to the use of our report dated March 10, 2010, except for the effects on the consolidated financial statements of the restatement described in Note 2 and 15, as to which the date is September 30, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of China Natural Gas, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K (Amendment No. 1) of China Natural Gas, Inc.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3/A (No. 333-160150), and Form S-8 (No. 333-166422) of the report described in the previous sentence appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K (Amendment No. 1) of China Natural Gas, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Frazer Frost, LLP





Brea, California


December 28, 2011





135 South State College Boulevard, Suite 300 | Brea, California 92821 | 714.990.1040 | frazerfrost.com


Los Angeles and Visalia, CA


FRAZER FROST, LLP is an independent firm associated with Moore Stephens International Limited.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the "Company") on


Form
      10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry R. Welch, in
      my
      capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











***/s/
                Jerry R. Welch***Date:
                December 29, 2006
            Jerry
                R. Welch
              Chief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended January 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry R. Welch, in my capacity
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Jerry R.
      WelchDate:  
      March
      30, 2009
            Jerry
      R. Welch
              Chief
      Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Yearly Report of Goldspring, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Faber,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


April 5, 2004                                    /s/ Robert Faber
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                     Robert Faber
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



                                                                              28
EXHIBIT 99.1

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Annual Report of SaiphT Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Suki Mudan, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.


/s/ Suki Mudan
____________________________________
Suki Mudan, President

Date:  March 28, 2003
Instructions, Form 309(A-I)

October 1, 2020

NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY CASE

General Information

Official Form 309 is used to give notice to creditors, equity security holders, and other 

interested parties of the filing of the bankruptcy case, the time, date, and location of the meeting 

of creditors, the time for filing various documents in the case, instructions for filing proofs of 

claim, and other information concerning the case.

Official Form 309 consists of several variations, numbered 309A through 309I, created to 

meet the specialized notice requirements for cases filed under chapters 7, 11, 12, and 13 of the 

Bankruptcy Code. The form to be used is determined by the chapter under which the bankruptcy 

petition was filed, the type of debtor (Individual or Joint Debtor, or Corporation or Partnership 

Debtor) and whether a proof of claim deadline is included. The versions of Official Form 309 

are listed below:

309A (For Individuals or Joint Debtors), Notice of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case – No 

Proof of Claim Deadline

309B (For Individuals or Joint Debtors), Notice of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case –Proof 

of Claim Deadline Set

309C (For Corporations of Partnerships), Notice of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case – No 

Proof of Claim Deadline

309D (For Corporations of Partnerships), Notice of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case – Proof 

of Claim Deadline Set

309E1 (For Individuals or Joint Debtors), Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case

309E2 (For Individuals or Joint Debtors under Subchapter V), Notice of Chapter 11 

Bankruptcy Case

309F1 (For Corporations of Partnerships), Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case

309F2 (For Corporations of Partnerships under Subchapter V), Notice of Chapter 11 

Bankruptcy Case

309G (For Individuals or Joint Debtors), Notice of Chapter 12 Bankruptcy Case 

309H (For Corporations of Partnerships), Notice of Chapter 12 Bankruptcy Case

309I Notice of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Case

Generally, the clerk will complete this form and mail (or transmit electronically) a copy 

to the creditors and other entities whose names and addresses appear on the mailing list or matrix 

filed by the debtor. Sometimes, the court delegates the noticing function to a chapter 13 trustee 

or, in a large chapter 11 case, to the debtor or a private notice provider. 

Applicability of Rule 9009(a)

Rule 9009(a) provides that “[t]the Official Forms prescribed by the Judicial Conference 

of the United States shall be used without alteration, except as otherwise provided ... in the 
Instructions, Form 309(A-I)

October 1, 2020

national instructions for a particular Official Form.” 

Courts, or, in the event that the noticing function has been delegated, the individual or 

entity providing notice, may modify this form by adding additional information and by updating

changed, broken, or incorrect internet links.
#### David Swing and others *against*the Inhabitants of the Upper Alloways Creek, in the County of Salem.

A party cannot commence a second action in the same court, for the same cause of action, until the costs of the first action are paid — and the rule is the same as to all courts within the same jurisdiction.

Sims, on behalf of the defendants, applied for a rule, upon the plaintiffs, to stay proceedings in this cause, in this court, until the costs of a former suit, between the same parties for the same cause of action, tried in the Court of Common Pleas of the county of Salem, were paid.

*Wall,*objected to the application,

because, he said, costs of the suit in the Salem Pleas had not been presented to plaintiffs for payment, or any execution issued against them.

*Jeffers*replied,

and read an affidavit, stating that the costs had been taxed and demanded; and also, a notice of this application and service thereof.

*70Ch. Justice.

Let the rule be granted. It appears that the costs have been taxed and demanded. It is a clear principle, that a party cannot commence a subsequent action in. the same court, for the- same cause of action, until the costs of the first action are paid; and the rule is the same as to all courts within the same jurisdiction.
#### Stephen Davidian, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Ann Davidian, et al., Respondents, v County of Nassau et al., Defendants, and Lewis Rosenberg, Appellant.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based upon medical malpractice, the defendant Lewis Rosenberg appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), dated March 30, 1988, which granted the plaintiffs’ application for a protective order vacating a judicial subpoena and notice to take the deposition of a nonparty witness.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant Rosenberg failed to establish any reasonable excuse whatsoever for the lengthy delay in seeking to depose the nonparty witness, much less the "good cause” or "unusual or unanticipated circumstances developing] subsequent to the filing of a note of issue and certificate of readiness which require additional pretrial proceedings to prevent substantial prejudice” (22 NYCRR 202.21 [d], [e]). At the latest, the defendant learned of the presence of the nonparty witness John Davidian at the labor and delivery of his wife, the plaintiff Ann Davidian, upon the latter’s deposition in December 1985. The note of issue and certificate of readiness were filed on Novem*618ber 12, 1986. Nevertheless, the appellant did not seek to depose John Davidian until February 1988, more than two years later. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
China Packaging Technologies, Inc. - Exhibit 10.7 - Filed by
   newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.7 

Form of Purchase Agreement 

(English Summary) 

	Parties to Contract 	
      Great Shengda as Buyer and Jiangsu Lee & Man Paper
      Manufacturing Co., Ltd. as Vendor 

	  	
       

	Details of Products 

	
      Raw paper 3,300,RMB per ton and the total amount is 2,000
      tons 
Brown paper N140'170g 3,450 per ton and the total amount is 5,000
      tons 
Brown paper N200'250g 3,400 per ton and the total amount is 7,000
      tons 

	  	
       

	Location of Delivery 	
      North of the Beitang River, Xiaoshan Economic and
      Technology Development Zone, Hangzhou 

	  	
       

	Payment Method 	
      Monthly payment, in 45 days after delivery, by Bank
      Acceptance 




	Undertaking 	1. 	
      The contract will become effective when the two parties
      sign on it, and it may be cancelled unless it is signed back in 7 days
    

		2. 	
      The price of products may change according to the
      circumstance of the market, and the two parties will consult with it.
Exhibit 13.2



Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Metal Storm Limited for the period ending December
31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof under cover of Form 20-F (the Report), I, Sylvie Moser-Savage, Company Secretary (principal accounting officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 15, 2004



By:

/s/ SYLVIE MOSER-SAVAGEName:

Sylvie Moser-SavageTitle:

Chief Financial Officer