alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GRAY, Appellant, v. PLATT, Respondent.

(Supreme Court General Term, Fourth Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Action by Abner P. Gray against Jerome R. Platt.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J„ and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment Of the county court affirmed, with costs.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Kevin PHILLIPS, also known as Head Phillips, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30203

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

Sean Matthew Toomey, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Stephen Andrew Higginson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gina Marie Recasner, Esq., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Kevin Phillips, Pollock, LA, pro se.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Kevin Phillips has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Phillips has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5m Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2643 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2643

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Attorney General to provide State officials with access 
   to criminal history information with respect to certain financial 
service providers required to undergo State criminal background checks, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Licensing Efficiency Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. BACKGROUND CHECKS.

    Section 1511(a) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (12 
U.S.C. 5110(a)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``State-licensed loan originators'' 
        the following: ``and other financial service providers''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``or 
        other financial service providers''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2643

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Attorney General to provide State officials with access 
   to criminal history information with respect to certain financial 
service providers required to undergo State criminal background checks, 
                        and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

 I, Gary  Musselman,  President,  Chief Executive  Officer,  and Chief Financial
Officer certify that:

         1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of Pacel
              Corporation;

         2.   Based on my knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any
              untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a material
              fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light of the
              circumstances   under  which  such   statements   were  made,  not
              misleading  with respect to the period  covered by this  quarterly
              report;

         3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other
              financial  information  included in this quarterly report,  fairly
              present in all material respects the financial condition,  results
              of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
              periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I are responsible
              for   establishing   and  maintaining   disclosure   controls  and
              procedures  (as defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14)
              for the registrant and have:

              a.   designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure
                   that  material   information   relating  to  the  registrant,
                   including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us
                   by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during the
                   period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

              b.   evaluated the  effectiveness of the  registrant's  disclosure
                   controls and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
                   the filing date of this  quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation
                   Date"); and

              c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions  about the
                   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
                   on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



May 18, 2006

/s/ GARY MUSSELMAN
-------------------------------
Gary Musselman, President, Chief Executive Officer,
and Chief Financial officer
Exhibit 13.2

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Sanofi, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
March 2, 2017



By:

/s/ Jérôme ContamineJérôme ContamineExecutive Vice President Chief Financial Officer (1)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanofi and will be
retained by Sanofi and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|(1) | Principal financial officer.
|--- | ----------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act(Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of June 2001.

*Name:*                         HRSA AIDS Advisory Committee (HAAC).                    

*Date and Time:*                         June 4, 2001; 8:30 a.m.—5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Corporate Square; Corporate Blvd., Building 8, first floor; Atlanta, Georgia 30329; Telephone: (404) 639-8008.                    

*Date and Time:*                         June 5, 2001; 8:30 a.m.—3:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Outreach, Inc.; 825 Cascade Ave., SW; Atlanta, GA 30311; Telephone: (404) 755-6700.                    

The meeting is open to the public.

*Agenda:*                         Agenda items for the meeting include a discussion of HIV prevention and care linkages with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on HIV and STD Prevention and rural issues.                    

Anyone requiring further information should contact Joan Holloway, HIV/AIDS Bureau, Parklawn Building, Room 7-13, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 443-5761.

Dated: April 18, 2001.

Jane Harrison,

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.

[FR Doc. 01-10229 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
Exhibit 12.2  I, Jérôme Contamine, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Sanofi;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the Audit Committee of the companys Board of Directors:  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 10, 2015  By:
/s/   Jérôme ContamineName:
Jérôme   ContamineTitle:
Executive   Vice President Chief Financial Officer (1)  
 (1)Principal financial officer.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1736

NORTON M. BOWMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-6078)

Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norton M. Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Belanger Durney, Karen

Deborah Utiger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,

D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Norton M. Bowman appeals from the tax court’s final decision

determining a deficiency with respect to his 1988 federal income

tax liability. Our review of the record and the tax court’s opinion

discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. (U.S. Tax Ct. Mar. 4, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| */s/                Doyal G. Bryant**Doyal                G. Bryant**President                and Chief Executive Officer* *April                19, 2006* |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                            |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02

                NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein
not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration
statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person
knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the
registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection
with the registration statement.

On June 12, 2002, Comshare, Incorporated (the "Company") appointed Ernst & Young
LLP to replace Arthur Andersen LLP as the independent auditor of the Company.
For additional information, see the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 13, 2002. After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain
Arthur Andersen LLP's written consent to the incorporation by reference of its
audit report with respect to the Company's financial statements as of June 30,
2001 and for the two years in the period then ended from this Form 10-K into the
Company's registration statements on Form S-8 (33-9755, 33-28437, 33-37564,
33-85720, 33-87706, 33-87708, 33-86908, 33-65109, 333-91477, 333-91479,
333-93549, 333-93551, 333-93553, and 333-76082) (collectively, the "Registration
Statements"). Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act
permits the Company to file this Form 10-K without a written consent from Arthur
Andersen LLP. However, as a result, with respect to transactions in the
Company's securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur
subsequent to the date this Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Arthur Andersen LLP will not have any liability under Section 11(a)
of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in
the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen LLP or any omissions of a
material fact required to be stated therein based upon the incorporation by
reference of such financial statements from this Form 10-K. Accordingly, you
would be unable to recover damages based upon a claim against Arthur Andersen
LLP under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act based upon the incorporation by
reference from this Form 10-K into the Registration Statements, because Arthur
Andersen LLP has not consented to such incorporation.
**Exhibit 8****Subsidiaries of Eurand N.V.**   **Name** **Jurisdiction of Incorporation**EA Acquisitions Corp. Delaware, USA   Eurand, Incorporated Nevada, USA   Eurand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Delaware, USA   Eurand Microencapsulation S.A. Switzerland   Eurand France S.A.S. France   Eurand S.p.A. Italy   Eurand Real Estate S.r.l. Italy   Eurand Pharmaceuticals Limited Republic of Ireland   SourceCF, Incorporated Alabama, USA   SourceCF Nutritionals LLC Alabama, USA   SourceCF Inhalation Systems LLC Delaware, USA   SourceCF CR&D LLC Delaware, USA
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Friendly Energy Corporation(the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"),





I,
      Douglass Tallant, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
      14th
      day April 2008.





/s/
                Douglas TallantDouglas Tallant,
                President/Director
#### Thomas E. Brastow, and others, *vs.*George H. M. Barrett.

Knox.

Opinion December 11, 1889.

*Pleading. Abatement. Pendency of same cause.*

A plea in abatement of the pendency of another action in this court, for the same cause and between the same parties, must set out or enroll the record or declaration of such action.

On exceptions.

The defendant excepted to the ruling of the court sustaining a demurrer to the following plea in abatement:—

Knox, ss.

Sup. Jud. Court, March Term, a. d. 1889.

*Thomas B. Brastow et ais.*v. *George B. M. Barrett.*

New entry. Writ dated December 6, 1888.

*167And the said defendant comes and defends &c., when &c., and saith that he ought not to be held to answer to the above writ and declaration of the plaintiffs against him but that the said writ ought to abate, because he says that at the time of the purchase of said writ and of the plaintiffs declaring therein, to wit: on the twenty-seventh day of November, A. D. 1888", the said plaintiffs purchased one other writ of that date returnable to the December term of said Sup. Jud. court, in and for said Knox county, and declared therein against the said defendant in a certain plea of land for the same cause of action in the writ and declaration aforesaid first mentioned, as by the files and record thereof, in this court remaining, appears.

And the said Thomas E. Brastow, Wilson A. Merriam and Edwin A. Morrill named as plaintiffs in both actions aforesaid, and the said George H. M. Barrett, named in both actions aforesaid as defendant, are the same persons and not others or divers; and the said plea of land is now pending in this court under docket No. 264 and yet remains undetermined. All of which the said defendant is ready to verify.

Wherefore, he prays judgment of the said writ, and that the same may be quashed.

*J. F.*ITanly, for defendant.

Plea sets out date of former writ, names of the parties, term of court to which writ is returnable, the plea, the docket number, and so much of the record cited in the plea as constitutes a sufficient setting out of the record or process.

*0. E.*Littlefield, for plaintiffs.

Vlrgin, J.

The defendant pleads in abatement of this action the pendency in this court, in this county, of another action between the same parties for the same cause; but has not set out, or enrolled in or with his plea the record or declaration on which he relies ; which omission the plaintiff contends is fatally defective to the plea.

In *Fahy*v. *Brannagan,*56 Maine, 42, and *Turner*v. Whitmore, 63 Maine, 526, this court substantially adopted the old English *168practice, which, required such setting out or enrolling of the record or declaration, although the English courts later seem to have modified their practice by adopting the more concise form, used in this case, of referring to the files and records of the court.

We feel bound by the cases cited, although the precise question was not distinctly raised therein.

The result is the entry must be

*Demurrer sustained. Plea adjudged had.*

*Defendant to answer over.*

Peters, C. J., Walton, Emery, Foster and Haskell, JJ., concurred.