alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 01-0623

ELLIS C. SMITH, APPELLANT,

v.

R. JAMES NICHOLSON,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KASOLD, LANCE, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Veteran Ellis C. Smith appeals through counsel a December 12, 2000, decision of the Board

of Veterans' Appeals (Board) that, inter alia, granted a disability rating of 10% (but no higher)

effective from June 10, 1999, for his service-connected tinnitus pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 4.87,

Diagnostic Code (DC) 6260 (2002), but denied a compensable rating prior to that date. This Court

(1) vacated the Board decision to the extent that it denied a compensable rating for tinnitus prior to

June 10, 1999, because the Board did not provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its

interpretation of the word "persistent" in the pre-1999 version of DC 6260, and (2) reversed the

Board's decision to the extent that it denied two separate 10% ratings for bilateral tinnitus under DC

6260. See Smith v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 63 (2005). The Secretary appealed.

On appeal, the Secretary argued only that the Court erred in its holding that the pre-June 13,

2003, versions of DC 6260 required the assignment of dual ratings for service-connected bilateral

tinnitus. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed that holding. See Smith v.

Nicholson, 451 F.3d 1344, 1350-51 (Fed. Cir. 2006), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 75 U.S.L.W. 3385

(Jan. 22, 2007). 

Accordingly, that portion of the December 12, 2000, decision of the Board denying a

disability rating greater than 10% for Mr. Smith's bilateral tinnitus is AFFIRMED. Because the

Board did not provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its interpretation of the word

"persistent" in the pre-1999 version of DC 6260, that part of the Board decision that denied a

compensable rating for tinnitus prior to June 10, 1999, is SET ASIDE, and the matter is

REMANDED for further adjudication consistent with the Court's April 5, 2005, opinion. See Smith,

19 Vet.App. at 71-74.

So ordered.

DATED: February 8, 2007 PER CURIAM.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21015-21016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-923 (Preliminary)]


Oleoresin Paprika From India

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject 
investigation, the United States International Trade Commission 
determines, pursuant to section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1673b(a)), that there is no reasonable indication that an 
industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with 
material injury, or that the establishment of an industry in the United 
States is materially retarded, by reason of imports from India of 
oleoresin paprika, provided for in subheading 3301.90.10 \2\ of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

[[Page 21016]]

United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less 
than fair value (LTFV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Other applicable subheadings identified in Commerce's scope 
include 1301.90.90, 1302.19.90, 3203.00.80, 3205.00.05, and 
3301.90.50.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    On March 6, 2001, a petition was filed with the Commission and the 
Department of Commerce by Rezolex, Ltd. Co., Las Cruces, NM, alleging 
that an industry in the United States is materially injured and 
threatened with material injury by reason of LTFV imports of oleoresin 
paprika from India. Accordingly, effective March 6, 2001, the 
Commission instituted antidumping duty investigation No. 731-TA-923 
(Preliminary).
    Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigation and of 
a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by 
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register of March 14, 2001 (66 FR 14934). The 
conference was held in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2001, and all 
persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in 
person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on April 20, 2001. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3415 (April 2001), 
entitled Oleoresin Paprika from India: Investigation No. 731-TA-923 
(Preliminary).

    Issued: April 20, 2001.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-10299 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Francis Mailhot, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MILLENNIUM CAPITAL
     VENTURE HOLDINGS, INC.(the "Issuer");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Issuer and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuer's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the Issuer's fourth
          fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2003that has materially affected,
          or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuer's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     Issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the Issuer's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Issuer's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Issuer's internal control
          over financial reporting.


By:  /s/    Francis Mailhot
     ----------------------
     Francis Mailhot
     President, Principal Financial
     Officer,
     Principal Accounting Officer,
     Chairman of the Board of Directors

Dated: March 16, 2005
Exhibit 99.2



                        Report of Independent Accountants


November 28, 2000

To the Board of Directors
of Oakwood Acceptance Corporation


We have examined management's assertion about Oakwood Acceptance Corporation's
(the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended September 30, 2000
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures, as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
September 30, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

<PAGE>

November 28, 2000

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
101 Centre Port Dr., Suite 250
Greensboro, NC 27409

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended September 30, 2000, Oakwood Acceptance Corporation
(the "Company") has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP).

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amount of $5,500,000 each.

/s/  Duane D. Daggett                       /s/  Robert A. Smith
Duane D. Daggett                            Robert A. Smith
President                                   Executive Vice President


/s/  Jimmy S. Griffin                       /s/  Suzanne H. Wood
Jimmy S. Griffin                            Suzanne H. Wood
Senior Vice President                       Vice President


/s/  Derek M. Surette                       /s/  Michael D. Rutherford
Derek M. Surette                            Michael D. Rutherford
Vice President                              Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
AND CCC SURETY OPERATIONS EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
AND SCHEDULES THERTO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           428,353
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      14,222
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 511,242
<CASH>                                           5,832
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              53,952
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          84,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 844,371
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                150,192
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            198,762
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                101,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           441
<OTHER-SE>                                     326,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   844,371
<PREMIUMS>                                     209,567
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             18,900
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 426
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      33,119
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     87,272
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            37,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,085
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,085
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 05-09

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), and in order to meet the needs of the Court, recalleligible retired judge John J. Farley, III, isrecalled to perform substantial service to the Court. Judge

Farley will be recalled on May 20, 2009, for a period of one day.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective May 20, 2009, John J. Farley, III, shall commence service as a

judge of the Court.

DATED: May 18, 2009 FOR THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
Directors' Compensation Table (effective as of March 15, 2010)



 Exhibit 10.05 
 AMBAC FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 
 2010 DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION TABLE 
 EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 15, 2010 
  

							
	 TYPE OF FEE
	  	AMOUNT	 	 	 MANNER OF PAYMENT

			
	Annual Fees/Awards	  				 	
			
	 •       Annual fee for serving as a director of Ambac Financial Group,
Inc.
	  	$	90,000	* 	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	 •       Annual fee for serving as a director of Ambac Assurance
Corporation
	  	 	None	  	 	
			
	 •       Annual fee for chairing the Audit and Risk Assessment Committee of Ambac
Financial Group, Inc.
	  	$	20,000	  	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	 •       Annual fee for chairing the Compensation Committee or Governance Committee of
Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
	  	$	10,000	  	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	 •       Annual fee for serving as Presiding Director of Ambac Financial Group,
Inc.
	  	$	75,000	  	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	Meeting Fees	  				 	
			
	 •       Annual or special meeting of Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
stockholders
	  	$	2,500	  	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	 •       Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Board meeting
	  	$	2,500	  	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	 •       Ambac Assurance Corporation Board meeting
	  	$	2,500	  	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	 •       Standing or special committee meeting held in conjunction with a stockholder or
board meeting
	  	$	1,500	  	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	 •       Standing or special committee meeting not held in conjunction with a stockholder
or board meeting
	  	$	1,500	  	 	Payable monthly in arrears in cash
			
	Travel and Related Expenses	  				 	
			
	 •       Travel and related expenses incurred in attending a stockholder, board or
committee meeting
	  	 
 
 	100% of
expenses
incurred	  
  
  	 	Payable in cash promptly upon submission of receipts to the Ambac Financial Group, Inc.

  

	*	The cash portion of the annual fee is prorated to reflect service on the Board of less than one full year prior to the relevant annual meeting of stockholders.










 AMBAC FINANCIAL GROUP,
INC. 
 2010 DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION TABLE 

 EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 15, 2010 
 (CONTINUED PAGE 2 OF 2) 
  

  

			
	 OTHER BENEFITS
	  	 DESCRIPTION

	 •       Deferred compensation
	  	Under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors and Eligible Senior Officers, non-employee directors may elect to defer all or part of their director
compensation (including both annual and meeting fees) that is paid in cash
		
	 •       Health and welfare
	  	Each non-employee director is permitted to enroll (without paying any premium) in the Ambac Financial Group, Inc. medical and dental plan and is eligible to receive a
$50,000 term life insurance policy (without paying any premium)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 09-21

IN RE: COURT CLOSURE ON FRIDAY,JUNE 18, 2021, IN OBSERVANCE OF JUNETEENTH NATIONAL 

INDEPENDENCE DAY

O R D E R

Juneteenth National Independence Day, a newly enacted federal holiday, falls on Saturday, 

June 19, 2021. The federal government will observe the holiday on Friday, June 18, 2021. By

direction of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be closed 

on Friday, June 18, 2021.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, Friday, June 18, 2021, will be considered a day when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET.

APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: June 17, 2021 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 10.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-54356, 333-117849, 333-136633, 333-158983 and 333-164064) pertaining to the 2003 Share Option Plan of Ceragon Networks Ltd. of our reports dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ceragon Networks Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ceragon Networks Ltd., included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.




Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 31, 2011
/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER

KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER

A Member of Ernst & Young Global
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Centiv, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 30, 2004                     By: /s/ Mak Wai Keung, Shawn
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  November 30, 2004                     By: /s/ Lau Kwok Hung
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 6, 2018

No. 04-18-00486-CR

Robert ROMERO,

Appellant

v.

STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 6, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 562296

Honorable Wayne A. Christian, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 1, 2018, we ordered Appellant Robert Romero to show cause why this appeal 

should not be dismissed, explaining that the trial court had signed a certification of defendant’s 

right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of 

appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On August 31, 2018, a supplement clerk’s record was 

filed containing a corrected certification of defendant’s right to appeal signed by the trial court. 

The trial court has certified that the defendant has the right to appeal. We therefore REINSTATE 

this appeal on the docket of the court. 

The clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed. Thus, we ORDER appellant to file his 

brief on or before October 8, 2018.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of September, 2018.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

GEORGE MASON, III, 

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D23-2184

LT Case No. 2014-CF-1379

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

/ 

Opinion filed July 25, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Hernando County,

Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge. 

George Mason, III, Indiantown, pro 

se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

EDWARDS, C.J., WALLIS and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Amendment No. 3 to Secondment Agreement


 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO SECONDMENT AGREEMENT
FOR JOHN TOWNSEND 
 This Amendment No. 3 is made as of this 7th day of December, 2009 to the Secondment Agreement for John Townsend
dated January 13, 2005 between Vodafone Americas Inc. and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, to modify the terms and conditions of the Agreement as follows: 
 1. The term of the Agreement set forth in Schedule 1 of the Agreement is hereby extended to March 31, 2011. 
 2. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
 3. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 3 to be executed by their respective duly authorized
representatives. 
  

			
	SIGNED by for and on behalf of
	Vodafone Americas Inc.
	
	 /s/ Megan Doberneck

	By:	 	Megan Doberneck
	Title:	 	President & General Counsel
	
	SIGNED by for and on behalf of
	Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
	
	 /s/ Martha Delehanty

	By:	 	Martha Delehanty
	Title:	 	VP-Human Resources