Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 07- 30811 Su m m ar y Cal endar

DE RRI CKSCOTT Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant
v. RAYHANS ON D efen da n t - A pp el l ee

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 5: 04- C V
- 460 B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d S T E W A R T an d O W E N , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * D e r r ic k S c o t t , L o u is ia n a p r i s o n e r#1 2 6 3 7 2 , a p p e a ls th e d is t r ic tc o u r t ’s j udg m e nt , fol l o w i ng a j ur y t r i al , di s m i s s i ng hi s 4 2 U . S. C. § 1 98 3 c o m pl ai nt aga i n sta pri son of

f i cer, R ay H an son, f

or u se of excessive f

orce. S cot t argu es on a p p e a l th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t e r r e din d e n y in gh is m o tio n fo ran e w tr ia l. Adi st ri ctcourt ’ s deci si on not t o gra n t a n e w t ri algen eral l y i s not a p p e a la b le . S ee Youm ans v . Si m o n, 791 F . 2d341 , 3 49 ( 5t h Ci r . 1 98 6) . I ns t e ad , United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Jul y 28, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 07- 30811

2 it is re g a r d e da s a n a tt a c k o n t h e fin a l ju d g m e n t. Se ei d. Sc ot tfai l ed t o m ove f or j u dg m en tas a m att er of law in the di st ri ctcou rta tt h e cl ose of t h e evi den ce p u r s u a n t t o F e d e r a l R u le o f C iv il P r o c e d u r e 5 0 . A c c o r d in g ly , o u rre v ie w is l i m i t ed to determ i n i n g “w h et h er t h ere w as a n ye v iden ce t o sup port t h e j u ry ve rd i ct. ” Flow ersv. S ou t h ern R eg’lPhysi ci an S ervs . I n c. , 2 4 7 F . 3 d2 2 9 , 2 3 8 ( 5 th C ir. 2 0 0 1 ). T o p r e v a il o n a n E ig h th A m e n d m e n t c la im o f u s e o f e x c e s s iv e fo r c e , a p l a i n tiff

m u st estab l i sh tha t t h e force w a s n ot ap p l i ed i n a g oo dfa i th eff ort to ma i n t a i n o rr e s t o r e d i s c i p l i n e , b u tma l i c i o u s l ya n ds a d i s t i c a l l yt o c a u s e h a r m. Huds o n v . McMi l l i an, 503 U . S . 1, 6
- 7 ( 199 2) . A tt ri al , H an son d en i ed u si n g m ace o n S c o tto u ts id e o f

a d i s c i p lin a r yco u r tr o o m a n dth e n d r a g g in gh im to h is ce ll. H an son ack n ow l edg ed that Scottw as st i l lres t rai n ed an d i n si de of hi s c el lw h en m ac e w as br i ef

l y us ed; how eve r , H anso n t es t i f i ed t hatt h e u se of

m ac e w as ju s tifie db yS c o tt ’ s co n tin u e dre fu s a l to co m p lyw ith o r d e r s to ce a s e h is di sruptive beh avior , w h i ch H an son sai d i n t erf ered w i t h au di o equ i pm en tused t o m on i t or t h e i n m ates an d gu ards. Th er ef or e, t her e w as s upport in th e r ec or d f ort he j ury’ s c onc l usi on t hat H a n s o n ’ s a c t i o n s d idn o t c o n s tit u te a n e x c e s s iv e u s e o f fo r c e . S ee B al dw i n v. S t alder , 1 3 7 F .3 d8 3 6 , 8 3 8 -3 9 , 8 4 1 ; Flow ers , 247 F. 3d at238. AF F I RMED.