alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.20

Shares Subscription Agreement

(This
Agreement is entered into between the following parties on January 30, 2016 in Beijing)

Issuer: China Tower Corporation Limited (China
Tower)

Subscriber: China Mobile Group Guangdong Co., Ltd.

Whereas the issuer and the subscriber have signed the Transaction Agreement of the Existing Telecommunication Tower and related Assets by Issuance of
Shares and Payment of Cash on October 14, 2015. Based on the above agreement and the specific circumstances of delivery of towers and related assets, the issuer has determined to issue a total of 119,344,615,024 shares at a par value of RMB1
per share.



|1. | Subscription Price
|-- | ------------------

RMB1 per share.



|2. | Subscription Amount and Quantity
|-- | --------------------------------

The subscriber confirms to pay RMB7,300,716,496 to subscribe
for 7,300,716,496 shares.



|3. | Subscription Method
|-- | -------------------

The subscriber agrees to subscribe for the shares issued by investing with
assets.



|4. | Payment Method
|-- | --------------

The subscriber has completed the actual payment of contribution before
December 31, 2015.



|5. | Shareholders Rights and Obligations
|-- | ------------------------------------

The both parties confirm that the subscriber shall
become the owner of shares subscribed for in this transaction from the effective date of this Agreement, and enjoy its shareholder rights and bear the corresponding obligations for such shares. The both parties agree that the issuer shall complete
the change to register of shareholders, revision of Articles of Association and change to industrial and commercial registration within 30 days after signing this Shares Subscription Agreement.



|6. | Entry into Force and Counterparts
|-- | ---------------------------------

This Agreement shall enter into force on December 31,
2015. This agreement is executed in six counterparts, each party holding two copies, and the rest shall be submitted for examination and approval/record filing.

(Reminder of this page intentionally left blank)



---

|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|Issuer: China Tower Corporation Limited (chop)    
|Legal representative or authorized representative 
|                                                  
|/s/ GAO Chunlei                                   
|                                                  
|Subscriber: China Mobile Group Guangdong Co., Ltd.
|Legal representative or authorized representative 
|                                                  
|/s/ JIAN Qin
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Michael A. Maltzman, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer of Stratus Services Group, Inc., (the “Company”), dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge the foregoing QuarterlyReport of the Company:

 
| (1)    |   | fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or  78o(d), and,                          |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                            |   |
| (2)    |   | the information contained  in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |

 

 
| Dated:  August 14, 2002 | By:    | /s/ Michael A. Maltzman |                                          |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                         |   |                    | Michael A. Maltzman                           |
|                         |   |                    | Chief Financial Officer                       |
|                         |   |                    | (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |

 

 

 

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

LOUISVILLE LADDER, INC.,

Appellant

v.

WERNER CO.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2021-1114

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-

00336.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

TERRY LEON WRIGHT, JR., Stites & Harbison, PLLC, 

Louisville, KY, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

JOEL T. BERES. 

 CHARLES M. MCMAHON, McDermott Will & Emery 

LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

THOMAS DAMARIO; MICHAEL S. NADEL, Washington, DC. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 21-1114 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 08/31/2021
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST and 

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

 

August 31, 2021

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-1114 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 08/31/2021
#### In the Matter of Love’M Sheltering, Inc., Appellant, v County of Suffolk et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 23, 2007;

decided May 8, 2007

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. ELDRIDGE v. JEWETT et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, *1128Fourth Department.

October 16, 1896.)

Certiorari by William H. Eldridge against Edgar B. Jewett, Charles A. Rupp, and James E. Curtiss, members of and constituting the board of police of the city of Buffalo.

No opinion. Motion granted, without costs. All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552(b)(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         May 21, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person*                         Tracy A. Shanan, Phd, Scientific Review Administrator, NIH/NIAMS, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4952.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 20, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-10359 Filed 4-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0455

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JACOB WILLIAM ABEL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing as well as agreement,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 4, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 25 2020

03/25/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0455
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 7, 2014

No. 04-14-00170-CV

ANDERSON ENERGY CORPORATION AND ELLERSLY, INC.,

Appellants/Cross-Appellees

v.

DOMINION OKLAHOMA TEXAS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC. and 

Highmount Exploration & Production Texas, LLC,

Appellees/Cross-Appellants

From the 112th Judicial District Court, Sutton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0005419

Honorable Pedro Gomez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The joint motion for extension of time to file reply briefs is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to October 16, 2014.

It is so ORDERED on October 7, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.b


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
Craig, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                 /S/ KENNETH CRAIG
                                                 -----------------
Date: December 28, 2004                          Kenneth Craig,
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gloria Kennedy, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in *People v Payton*(152 AD2d 933). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — robbery, second degree; grand larceny, fourth degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.
EX-10.9





 Exhibit 10.9 

Power of Attorney 
 I, Qiuwen WANG, a
Chinese citizen whose ID card number is [            ], am a shareholder holding 95% equity (My Equity) in Shanghai Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co., Ltd. For my equity, I
hereby irrevocably authorize CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. to exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 

CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. is authorized to act as my sole and exclusive agent to exercise the rights with respect of the matters related
to my equity, including but not limited to: (i) to attend the shareholders’ meeting of Shanghai Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co., Ltd.; (ii) to exercise all the shareholders’ rights and voting rights that I have in accordance
with the laws of China and the Articles of Association of Shanghai Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co., Ltd., including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or disposal of all or any part of my equity; and (iii) as my
authorized representative, to designate and appoint the Legal Representative, Board Chairman, Executive Directors, Directors, Supervisors, General Manager and other senior management members of Shanghai Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co.,
Ltd. 
 CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. will have the rights to sign the transfer contract agreed in the Exclusive Purchase Right Contract
(to which I am a contracting party as required) on my behalf within the scope of authorization, and perform the Equity Pledge Contract and the Exclusive Purchase Right Contract executed by me as a party thereto and the instruments, documents or
provisions amending, supplementing, substituting and / or restating the same from time to time. The exercise of these rights will not limit this Power of Attorney. 

All acts of CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. in respect of my equity are deemed to be my acts, and all documents signed by it are deemed to be
signed by me and will be recognized by me. 
 CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. has the right to
re-entrust any other person or entity to handle the aforesaid matters without giving me a prior notice or obtain my prior consent. 

This Power of Attorney shall be irrevocable and continue to be valid as of the date of signing of the Power of Attorney while I am a shareholder of Shanghai
Caishuo Talent Information Consulting Co., Ltd. 
 During the term of this Power of Attorney, I hereby waive all rights relating to my equity which have
been authorized to CDP Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. through this Power of Attorney, and I shall not exercise such rights on my own. 
  

	
	Qiuwen WANG
	
	/s/ Qiuwen Wang
	        Date: January 23, 2018
ex10-56.htm











Exhibit 10.56


 


Sales Contract







Supplier: Wuhan Yangpu Chemicals Co., Ltd.


Buyer: Sanming Huajian Bioengineering Co., Ltd.







The Parties have, after friendly consultation in accordance with the Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China, entered into this contract in Wuhan. The Parties agree as follows:








	
I.  

	
Items, quantity (in tons), prices and amounts








	
Items

	
quality

	
Packaging

	
Qty

	
Unit price

	
Total


	
Petroleum ether

	
Grade-A, National Standard

	
Apron

	
28.2

	
7,850 yuan/ton

	
221,370


	  	  	  	  	  	  
	
Total: RMB 221,370 yuan













	
II.  

	
Warranties: The Supplier warrants that the products comply to Grade-A of the national standard at the time of the delivery.








	
III.  

	
Delivery Venue: The products shall be delivered to the Buyer’s plant.








	
IV.  

	
Transportation: The Supplier shall be responsible for the transportation.








	
V.  

	
Delivery Date: The products shall be delivered between December 1, 2009 and December 25, 2009, and can be provided in batches.








	
VI.  

	
Transportation charges: the Supplier shall bear all related transportation costs, which are included in the total price.








	
VII.  

	
Packaging: the products can be packaged in the form of aprons.








	
VIII.  

	
Inspection:







In the event of any dispute about the quality of products between the Parties, relevant state inspection authorities can be engaged to conduct tests; where the test results confirm that products are up to the standard, the Buyer shall accept them and make payments accordingly, otherwise, the Buyer shall be held liable for any damages arising from refusal to accept the products.



	
IX.  

	
Settlement of Payment and Term.







The Supplier shall provide the Buyer with a 17% VAT invoice for the payment due, and the Buyer shall settle the payments within 30 days following receipt of the invoice.



	
X.  

	
Liability for Breach of Contract







Any breach of Contract shall be accorded with penalties in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.



	
XI.  

	
Miscellaneous








	
1)  

	
The Parties shall enter into separate agreements for matters not mentioned herein. Neither Party shall modify the Contract at its own discretion without obtaining the consent from the other Party.








	
2)  

	
This Contract is executed in two counterparts, with either Party holding one copy.








	
3)  

	
This Contract shall enter into force upon execution, with faxed copies holding equally binding force.












Supplier:                                                      Buyer: Fujian Huajian Bioengineering Co., Ltd.


Legal representative: Wei Lanying         Legal representative: Zheng Minyan


Tel: 027-228429                                          Tel:0598-8523617


Fax: 027-83372219/83257915                     Fax: 0598-8321366
(85 South. 924)

#### THOMPSON v. STATE.

(8 Div. 230.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 3, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W. W. Haralson, Judge. George Thompson was convicted of murder in the second degree, and he appeals.

. Affirmed.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

GARDNER, J.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree. The record has been carefully examined in consultation, and we find nothing calling for discussion or separate treatment here. Suffice it to say, therefore, that upon consideration of this cause no reversible error appears, and the judgment of conviction will accordingly be here affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-124999) pertaining to the Emageon Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, Emageon Inc. 2005Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan, Emageon Inc. 2000 Equity Compensation Plan, ImageonSolutions, Inc. 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and Ultravisual Medical Systems Corporation 2000 StockOption Plan, of our reports dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Emageon Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Emageon Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December31, 2007./s/ Ernst&Young LLPAtlanta, Georgia
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-211254, 333-165418, 333-157685, 333-149203, 333-145074, 333-139555, 333-121584, and Form F-3 No.333-210203) of Sanofi of our reports dated March 2nd, 2017, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Sanofi and its subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sanofi and its subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France 

March 2, 2017 

PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit 

/s/ Philippe Vogt            /s/ Stéphane Basset
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Rogers, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of burglary in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and petit larceny, all arising from the theft of a diamond drill press from the premises of Syracuse Ladder and Scaffolding Company. He made a pretrial motion to suppress the drill, which was seized from a pickup truck in which he was a passenger. On appeal defendant contends that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the pickup truck. We disagree.

On December 30, 1987 at about 12:50 a.m., Officer Conley of the Syracuse Police Department responded to a police radio report of a burglary at the premises of Syracuse Ladder and Scaffolding Company. At the time, the ground was covered with snow. When Officer Conley arrived at the scene he was told that there had been a breakin on the west side of the building and he was instructed by another officer to investigate a truck which was parked about one block away. The area was essentially industrial in nature; it included open fields but no residences. As Officer Conley approached the vehicle, two men, whose clothes were covered with snow from their waists down, entered the pickup truck and it left the *948scene. Given these facts, Officer Conley possessed the requisite reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle *(see,*CPL 140.50 [1]; *People v Cantor,*36 NY2d 106).

Also without merit is defendant’s argument that the People failed to prove the reliability of the hearsay information received by Officer Conley prior to stopping the truck. "The *reliability*of the information conveyed may be assumed by the officer in the field *(People v Lypka,*36 NY2d 210, 213-214) and by the suppression court as well so long as defendant raises no specific challenge *(People v Jenkins,*47 NY2d 722).” *(People v Dodt,*61 NY2d 408, 416 [emphasis in original].) Defense counsel’s ambiguous statement at the close of the suppression hearing was insufficient to apprise the People that defendant sought to challenge the reliability, as opposed to the sufficiency, of Officer Conley’s information *(see, People v Fenner,*61 NY2d 971). Absent a specific challenge to the reliability of the hearsay information, the issue is unpreserved for review *(see, People v Dodt, supra,*at 416; *People v Weston,*56 NY2d 844).

We have examined defendant’s other arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — burglary, third degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
#### KIERMAN et al., Appellants, v. AGRICULTURAL INS. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

June 20, 1894.)

Action by William Kierman and another against the Agricultural Insurance Company.

No opinion. Motion for reargument granted. •
Letter of Continued Employment




 EXHIBIT 10.57 

Pro Acquisition Corporation 

c/o HD Supply, Inc. 

3100 Cumberland Blvd., Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30339 
  

 
 August 10, 2007 

 
 Ms. Anesa T. Chaibi 

c/o HD Supply, Inc. 
 10641 Scripps Summit Ct.

 San Diego, CA 92131 
  

	 	Re:	Continued Employment with HD Supply, Inc. 


Dear Anesa: 
 Reference is made
to your letter agreement, dated as of June 5, 2007, with HD Supply, Inc., The Home Depot, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. 

As you know, Pro Acquisition Corporation has entered into an agreement to acquire HD Supply, Inc., from The Home Depot, Inc. This letter
confirms that, upon and subject to the closing of the acquisition, your employment as an at-will employee will continue on the same terms as those in effect prior to closing. Specifically, after closing (i) your base salary and target annual
cash bonus opportunity will be not less than before closing, (ii) your principal place of employment will remain in the same metropolitan area, and (iii) you will report directly to Joe DeAngelo, HD Supply’s Chief Executive Officer.

 In addition, upon and subject to the closing of the acquisition, you will be covered by a severance arrangement that provides
a benefit of at least 12 months’ base salary continuation (at a rate not lower than your base salary on June 5, 2007). 

We appreciate your service to HD Supply, and look forward to working with you in the future. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ David A. Novak 

Dave A. Novak 

Co-President