alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Matthias Williamson *against*James Brown.

If from a judgment rendered by a justice in favor of a defendant, tlio plaintiff appeals, and on the trial of the appeal submit the cause to a jury, he cannot, by voluntarily withdrawing or neglecting to appear when called, obtain a non-suit, or prevent a verdict being rendered against him.

M. Williamson brought an action in a plea of debt, against James Brown, before a justice of the peace. Brown filed an account by way of set off. On the trial, a verdict was found in favor of Brown for a certain sum, for which, with costs, judgment was rendered. Williamson appealed ; and in the Court of Common Pleas, the jury, after having heard the cause and withdrawn for a time, returned into court to rénder their verdict. Williamson did not appear, but the court received the verdict, which was again in favor of Brown, and rendered judgment upon it.

*352
      *Seudder*moved to reverse this judgment.

He contended that Williamson had a legal right to withdraw, and of his own choice to submit to a non-suit; and that the court, instead of receiving the verdict, should have dismissed the jury and rendered judgment of non-suit.

*John J. Chetwood,*contra, relied on *Reed*v. *Rocap,*4 *Halst.*347.

By the Court.

Although not precisely the same in point of fact, this case is within the principles on which the decision was made in *Reed*v. *Rocap.*

Let the judgment be affirmed.
#### In the Matter of William Oliver, Petitioner, v Walter Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Determination unanimously annulled on the law and petition granted *(see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*125 AD2d 923, *lv granted*69 NY2d 608). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 18-07

IN RE: COURT CLOSED ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2007

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be

closed on Friday, November 23, 2007.

For purposes of computation of time, under the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure,

Friday, November 23, 2007, will be considered a day when the Clerk's Office has been closed. See

U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: October 30, 2007 FOR THE COURT:

NORMAN Y. HERRING

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5874 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5874

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  Making supplemental appropriations for the United States Patent and 
Trademark Office for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 
That the following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2010, and for other purposes, namely:

                         DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

               United States Patent and Trademark Office

    For an additional amount for ``Salaries and Expenses'' of the 
United States Patent and Trademark Office, $129,000,000, to remain 
available until expended: Provided, That the sum herein appropriated 
from the general fund shall be reduced as offsetting collections 
assessed and collected pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1113 and 35 U.S.C. 41 and 
376 are received during fiscal year 2010, so as to result in a fiscal 
year 2010 appropriation from the general fund estimated at $0: Provided 
further, That during fiscal year 2010, should the total amount of 
offsetting fee collections be less than $2,016,000,000, this amount 
shall be reduced accordingly.

                          Bureau of the Census

                     periodic censuses and programs

    Of funds made available under this heading by Public Law 111-117, 
$129,000,000 are hereby rescinded.
     This Act may be cited as the ``United States Patent and Trademark 
Office Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5874

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  Making supplemental appropriations for the United States Patent and 
Trademark Office for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
ex10-17.htm


Exhibit 10 (17)


 


EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO PERSONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO PERSONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, dated as of February 9, 2010 by and between American Biltrite Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ABI”) and Congoleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Congoleum”);


 


WITNESSETH:


 


THAT WHEREAS, ABI and Congoleum are parties to a Personal Services Agreement, dated as of March 11, 1993 (the “Personal Services Agreement”), as amended February 8, 1995, November 15, 1996, March 10, 1998, November 7, 2002, March 11, 2008,  September 23, 2008, and June 17, 2009 pursuant to which ABI agreed that Roger S. Marcus would serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Congoleum and Richard G. Marcus would serve as the Vice Chairman of Congoleum, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Personal Services Agreement;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreement set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Extension of Term.  The term of the Personal Services Agreement is renewed until the earlier of (a) the effective date of a plan of reorganization for Congoleum Corporation, et al., following a final order of confirmation, or (b) June 30, 2010.







 



	
  

	
2.

	
Ratification.  Each of ABI and Congoleum hereby ratifies and confirms all of the terms and provisions of the Personal Services Agreement, as amended hereby.







 



	
  

	
3.

	
Counterparts.  This Amendment to Personal Services Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original but all of which shall collectively constitute a single instrument.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment to Personal Services Agreement as of the date first above written.


 



	  	
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC.


 


	  	  	  
	  	
By:


 


	  	
/s/Richard G. Marcus


 


	  	
Name:


 

	
Richard G. Marcus


 


	  	
Title:


 

	
President


 


	  	  	  
	  	
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION


 


	  	
By:


 


	  	
/s/Roger S. Marcus


 


	  	
Name:


 

	
Roger S. Marcus


 


	  	
Title:


 

	
Chief Executive Officer
Designated for Publication on May 21, 2008

Designated for electronic publication only

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 05-3555

WILLIE H. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,

V.

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D.,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before MOORMAN, LANCE, and DAVIS, Judges.

O R D E R

Note: Pursuant to U.S. Vet. App. R. 30(a),

this action may not be cited as precedent.

On April 11, 2008, the Court received a joint motion for stay in which the parties informed

the Court that the appellant had died on March 18, 2008. (Appellant's appeal of an August 26, 2005,

decision was pending when he died.) The parties moved for a stay of proceedings in order that

counsel for the appellant have time to investigate the possibility of substituting a surviving spouse

in the appeal. The Court granted the motion for stay on April 18, 2008. 

On April 17, 2008, however, counsel for the appellant filed a motion to withdraw the appeal.

In that motion, the appellant's counsel informed the Court that the appellant has no surviving spouse

or other dependents having standing to assert a claim under 38 U.S.C. § 5121. 

The Court agrees that under these circumstances the appellant's death terminates this appeal

as a matter of law. See Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 48 (1994). 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the stay of proceedings is LIFTED. It is further

ORDERED that the Board decision dated August 26, 2005, is VACATED with respect to

the matters appealed to the Court. It is further
ORDERED that the appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is

DISMISSED.

DATED: May 8, 2008 PER CURIAM. 

Copies to:

Kenneth M. Carpenter, Esq. 

General Counsel (027)
| 1.     | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | the      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |

| Dated:  May 12,      2008 |                                       |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                     | By:  /s/ Joseph J.      Raymond  |
|                                     | Joseph      J. Raymond                     |
|                                     | Chairman      of the Board of Directors,   |
|                                     | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

----
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Vincent C. Klinges, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Logility, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 11, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Vincent C. Klinges 
|                        |  |     |  | Vincent C. Klinges     
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 06-07

IN RE: COMMITTEE ON ADMISSION AND PRACTICE

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN,

LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED that David B. Isbell, Esq., is appointed as a member of the Committee on

Admission and Practice (A&P) for a term expiring November 19, 2009, (A&P Rule 2(a)(3)),

replacing David F. Addlestone, Esq, whose term expired on November 19, 2006, but was

extended under A&P Rule 2(a)(2) until a successor was appointed.

DATED: January 31, 2007 BY THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
#### RISK, Respondent, v. UFFELMAN et al., Appellants.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

April 2, 1894.)

Action by William Risk against Richard Uffelman and others. Appellants move for leave to appeal to the court of appeals.

U. W. Tompkins, for appellants.

Jas. R. Angel, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The very exhaustive opinion delivered upon the affirmance of the judgment appealed from leaves no room for doubting its measure of exact justice. 27 N. Y. Supp. 392. The flagrant—almost criminal—abuse of judicial process, upon which the judgment is founded, does not commend the appellants to favorable consideration, in so far as their present motion is addressed Jo the discretion of the court; but the judgment is mainly predicated on a conflict of evidence, and the questions of law involved are not of so novel or intricate a character that we feel justified in remitting them to the attention of the court of appeals, and for those reasons we deny the motion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
Exhibit 32.1

                    Bingham Canyon Corporation

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation certifies pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..      the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
       December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
       or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..      the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:   June 30, 2006
                                   /s/ Brett D. Mayer
                                   ____________________________________
                                   Brett D. Mayer
                                   Principal Executive Officer
                                   Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 99.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND THE INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

 

 

 

 

I,Henry J. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief FinancialOfficer of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Registrant”), does hereby certify in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, towhich this certificate is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m), as amended; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|               |                                                         |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| February 26,  2003 | /s/ Henry J.  Boucher, Jr.                                   |
|               | Chief  Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|               |                                                         |

** **

** **

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Leada Tak Tai Li, Chief Financial Officer of CHINA PRECISION STEEL,
      INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
      10 th day of
      November 2008.





/s/
                Leada Tak Tai LiLeada
                Tak Tai LiChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel,
      Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
# Understanding Our H-1B Employer Data Hub

On April 1, 2019, USCIS launched the H-1B Employer Data Hub to provide information on employers petitioning for H-1B workers. The data hub provides an additional layer of transparency to the H-1B program by allowing the public to search for H-1B petitioners by fiscal year, NAICS code, employer name, city, state, or ZIP code. USCIS processes an average of 8 million applications, petitions, and requests annually. These include more than half a million Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, petitions for H-1B workers and other employment-based nonimmigrant workers. We receive numerous requests from Congress, research institutions, the media, and the public about the H-1B program and who uses it. We strive to make as much data about our operations available to the public as possible. We do so to improve understanding of the immigration system and our role in it, as well as to comply with our reporting mandates.

## How USCIS Collects the Data

Employers petitioning for temporary foreign workers in specialty occupations must have a certified Labor Condition Application from the Department of Labor and then must submit a Form I-129 to USCIS. Data provided in the H-1B Employer Data Hub are collected from fields on an employer’s Form I-129 or adjudicative decisions. The approval and denial data in the data hub reflects USCIS’ first decision. Subsequent decisions, such as on an appeal or revocation, are excluded. The data does not include petitions that are pending adjudication when USCIS generates the data.

## Data Accuracy

We strive to ensure that the data in our electronic systems are accurate, but because we transfer data from paper forms into the electronic systems manually, data entry errors may occur. Additionally, information provided on a paper form is reported by the applicant, petitioner, or requestor (or their representative or preparer), so there may be errors on the forms when we receive them. For example, an applicant may mix up numbers in their tax identification number.

Data entry and petitioner errors may result in a missing and/or erroneous employer name, tax ID, state, city, or ZIP code in our electronic systems.

## How the Data Hub Is Organized and Maintained

The counts of initial approval, initial denial, continuing approval, and continuing denial are aggregated by distinct completion fiscal year, two digit NAICS code, tax ID, state, city, and ZIP code. For example, one employer with multiple addresses in a given fiscal year will have multiple rows in the data. The most common spelling of employer name per unique tax ID is used.

We anticipate updating the H-1B Employer Data Hub quarterly and providing downloadable data files. For example, data for the first quarter (October-December) of a fiscal year will be provided in April of the fiscal year.

## H-1B Employer Data Hub Glossary

02/14/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.