alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

No. 98-2247

DEE W. KILPATRICK, APPELLANT,

V.

TOGO D. WEST, JR.

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and HOLDAWAY and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

The appellant appeals through counsel an August 24, 1998, Board of Veterans' Appeals

(Board) decision that denied Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) financial assistance in the

purchase of special adaptive housing, an automobile, and adaptive equipment, and a special

home-adaptation grant. Record (R.) at 3. On May 11, 1999, the appellant filed a brief. On October

15, 1999, the Secretary filed a brief. In his brief, the Secretary does not address the appellant's

primary arguments, but the Secretary also asserts that "[h]e specifically does not concede any issue

. . . which [he] did not address, and reserves the right to address same if the Court finds it necessary

or advisable." Brief (Br.) at 7. The Court does.

Hence, we will order the Secretary to file a supplemental brief in this case addressing all of

the appellant's arguments that the Secretary has not yet addressed and as to which he does not

"concede" the appellant's position, including those identified in the section of the Secretary's brief

captioned, "2. Appellant's Newly-Raised Arguments" (Br. at 4). The Secretary's supplemental brief

should include a discussion of the appellant's arguments concerning the validity of VA Gen. Coun.

Prec. 24-97 (July 3, 1997), both substantively and in terms of the process by which it was issued by

VA, as well as whether it applies to this case and whether any deference is owed to that precedential

opinion, see Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837, 843 (1984). Finally, the

Secretary should address the application of Maggitt v. West, No. 99-7023, 2000 WL 124452 (Fed.

Cir. Feb. 3, 2000), and Stuckey v. West, 13 Vet.App. 163 (1999), to the Secretary's argument that the

Court should not address the arguments raised by the appellant to the Court but not to the Board in

this case.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary file, and

serve on the appellant, a supplemental brief in accordance with this order and that addresses those

arguments raised in the appellant's brief that the Secretary does not concede. It is further
2

ORDERED that, not later than 20 days after service of the Secretary's supplemental brief, the

appellant may file a supplemental brief in response.

DATED: March 21, 2000 PER CURIAM.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6144 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6144

To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
              with respect to lighting energy efficiency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2010

  Mr. Barton of Texas (for himself, Mr. Burgess, and Mrs. Blackburn) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation 
 and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
              with respect to lighting energy efficiency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Better Use of Light Bulbs Act''.

SEC. 2. LIGHTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle B of title III of the Energy Independence 
and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-140) is repealed.
    (b) Application.--The Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6201 et seq.) shall be applied and administered as if subtitle B of 
title III of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (and the 
amendments made by that subtitle) had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 01-211

PATRICK M. LEWIS, APPELLANT,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before FARLEY, IVERS, and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

On January 7, 2003, the Court granted, in part, the appellant's application for attorney fees

and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. On February 12, 2003,

the Court granted the appellant's motion for an extension of time to file a motion pursuant to Rule

35 of this Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure. On March 5, 2003, the appellant filed a motion

for a decision by a panel. On March 13, 2003, he filed a motion for a stay pending the resolution of

Abbey v. Principi, No. 01-501. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant's motion for a decision by a panel is denied.

DATED: April 24, 2003 PER CURIAM.

STEINBERG, Judge, dissenting: For the following reasons, I voted to grant the appellant's

March 5, 2003, motion for a panel decision: (1) I believe that the additional evidence (at least five

affidavits are new) submitted by the appellant in his motion for a panel decision (Motion at 7-8,

Attachments A-E) warrants the panel's consideration and (2) in the pending case of Abbey

v. Principi, No. 01-501, the Court issued an order directing the appellant there to file a memorandum

"that explains why the prevailing market rate in this case should not be $90 per hour", Abbey,

16 Vet.App. 543, 544 (2002) (per curiam order), and I believe that a similar order should be issued

in the instant case. Hence, I also vote to grant the appellant's March 13, 2003, motion for a stay

pending the resolution of Abbey, supra.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00089-CV

MARLENE W. MITCHELL, Appellant

V.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUNDS 

SOCIETY, FSB, D/B/A CHRISTIANA 

TRUST AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF THE 

RESIDENTIAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES 

TRUST III, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at 

Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2017-005148-1)

January 10, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Leada Tak Tai Li, the
Chief Financial Officer of CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC. (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 16th day of November,
2009.





/s/ Leada Tak Tai LiLeada
      Tak Tai LiChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Nutra Pharma Corp. on  Form  10KSB/A  for  the  period  ending  December 31, 2003,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Rik J. Deitsch,  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Rik J. Deitsch



_____________________

Rik J. Deitsch

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 7, 2004
#### KUHNE, Respondent, v. GESCHEIDT et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

May 14, 1894.)

Appeal from circuit court, Richmond county.

Action by Martha C. Kuhne against Charles A. Gescheidt and others.

H. M. Gescheidt, for appellants.

Theodore B. Gates, for respondent.

DYKMAN, J.

This was an action upon a written instrument in the nature of a mortgage upon real property, containing an express covenant to pay. There was no question to submit to the jury, and the court, properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6176 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6176

To amend section 340B of the Public Health Service Act to allow certain 
covered entities to resell or transfer a covered outpatient drug to an 
    individual with HIV/AIDS in connection with medication regimen 
   adherence services being provided to the individual by a licensed 
                health care professional of the entity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2010

  Mr. Deutch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 340B of the Public Health Service Act to allow certain 
covered entities to resell or transfer a covered outpatient drug to an 
    individual with HIV/AIDS in connection with medication regimen 
   adherence services being provided to the individual by a licensed 
                health care professional of the entity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON PRICES OF DRUGS PURCHASED BY CERTAIN COVERED 
              ENTITIES FOR RESALE OR TRANSFER TO INDIVIDUALS WITH HIV/
              AIDS RECEIVING MEDICATION REGIMEN ADHERENCE SERVICES.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 340B(a)(5) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 256b(a)(5)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a covered entity 
described in paragraph (4)(J) may resell or transfer the drug to an 
individual with HIV/AIDS (as defined in section 2689) in connection 
with medication regimen adherence services being provided to the 
individual by a licensed health care professional in such 
professional's capacity as an employee, contractor, or volunteer of the 
entity.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### PEOPLE v. LUCAS et al.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

April 2, 1894.)

George Lucas and Charles Lighte move to vacate judgment entered on a forfeited recognizance.

J. R. Fellows, for the People.

F. P. Trautman, for defendant.

DALY, C. J.

The certificate of the district attorney evidently refers to a different case from that described in the certificate of the special sessions, where the prisoner was' sentenced to imprisonment, and not to pay a fine. Application denied, with leave to renew upon proper proofs.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 06-1113

LARRY L. PAYTON, APPELLANT,

V.

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D.,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KASOLD, LANCE, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Before the Court is a June 10, 2008, joint motion by the parties to vacate and remand, in part,

a March 8, 2006, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) that (1) denied entitlement to

service connection for a bilateral knee disorder, claimed as secondary to a low back disability, (2)

denied entitlement to service connection for hypertension, to include as secondary to serviceconnected conversion reaction with psychoneurosis, and (3) remanded a claim for entitlement to

service connection for the residuals of a low back injury. On April 30, 2008, the Court ordered oral

argument before this panel, to be held on June 24, 2008. On May 14, 2008, the Court ordered

supplemental briefing by both parties. 

In the joint motion, the parties request that the Court vacate and remand the portion of the

Board decision denying entitlement to service connection for hypertension. Joint Motion (Mot.) at 1.

They agree that the claim should be vacated and remanded for VA to comply with its duty to assist,

see Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), Pub. L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat. 2096. Joint

Mot. at 2. The joint motion also indicates that the appellant no longer wishes to appeal the portion

of the Board decision denying entitlement to service connection for a bilateral knee disorder. Id.

at 1.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Court's May 14, 2008, order for supplemental briefing is

WITHDRAWN. It is further

ORDERED that the joint motion for partial vacatur and remand is GRANTED, and the

portion of the Board's decision denying entitlement to service connection for hypertension, to include

as secondary to service-connected conversion reaction with psychoneurosis, is VACATED and

REMANDED pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a), for compliance with the terms of the joint motion.

The appeal is DISMISSED as to the portion of the Board decision denying entitlement to service 

connection for a bilateral knee disorder, claimed as secondary to a low back disorder. Under Rule
41(b) of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, this order is the mandate of the Court.

DATED: June 17, 2008 PER CURIAM.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


HRSA AIDS Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act(Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of June 2001.

    Name: HRSA AIDS Advisory Committee (HAAC).
    Date and Time: June 4, 2001; 8:30 a.m.--5 p.m.
    Place: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Corporate 
Square; Corporate Blvd., Building 8, first floor; Atlanta, Georgia 
30329; Telephone: (404) 639-8008.
    Date and Time: June 5, 2001; 8:30 a.m.--3:30 p.m.
    Place: Outreach, Inc.; 825 Cascade Ave., SW; Atlanta, GA 30311; 
Telephone: (404) 755-6700.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: Agenda items for the meeting include a discussion of HIV 
prevention and care linkages with the Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention's Advisory Committee on HIV and STD Prevention and 
rural issues.
    Anyone requiring further information should contact Joan 
Holloway, HIV/AIDS Bureau, Parklawn Building, Room 7-13, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 443-5761.

    Dated: April 18, 2001.
Jane Harrison,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 01-10229 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
exv4w2






Exhibit 4.2







			
	Number	 	Shares
	SPECIMEN
	 	SPECIMEN






ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC.




Common Stock

$.01 Par Value Per Share



SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER



     This certifies that SPECIMEN is the owner of SPECIMEN (XXXXX) shares, fully paid and
nonassessable, of the Common Stock of ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC., a Delaware corporation, transferable
only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by attorney upon surrender
of this certificate properly endorsed.



     This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of
Delaware and to the Certificate of Incorporation and the By-laws of the Corporation, in each case
as from time to time amended.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC., has caused this certificate to be signed by its
duly authorized officers as of this       day of                        , 20    .



	 	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 	 	 
	President
	 	Secretary or Treasurer






[seal]



 









 





Restrictions on Transfer





The corporation has more than one class of stock authorized to be issued. The corporation
will furnish without charge to each stockholder upon written request a copy of the full text
of the preferences, voting powers, qualifications and special and relative rights of the shares of each class of stock (and any series thereof) authorized to be issued by the
corporation as set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation and
amendments thereto filed with the Secretary of the state of Delaware.



Assignment



     For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers to                     shares of the capital stock represented by this certificate, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints   
                  
      
      
      
      
      
      
   
attorney to transfer such stock on the books of the Corporation with full power of substitution in
the premises.



     Dated                        ,



	 	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Signature of registered owner
corresponding exactly to the name
of such owner as written on the face
of this certificate.
	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 	 	 

	Witness
Exhibit 13.2




SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION




(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 of Hydrogenics Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Jennifer Barber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:

/s/ Jennifer BarberName:

Jennifer BarberTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




Date: March 27, 2012







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hydrogenics Corporation and will be retained by Hydrogenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

| Company                                     |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Ceragon Networks, S.A. de C.V.              |   | Mexico                        |
| Ceragon Networks, Inc.                      |   | New Jersey                    |
| Ceragon Networks do Brasil Limitada         |   | Brazil                        |
| Ceragon Networks (India) Private Limited    |   | India                         |
| Ceragon Networks (Philippines), Inc.        |   | Philippines                   |
| Ceragon Networks APAC (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. |   | Singapore                     |

----

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                            OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, John J. Puisis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Third Wave
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this
Certification:

1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 15, 2005

                                                        /s/ John J. Puisis
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        John J. Puisis


                                       57
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Appellate case name: LG Chem America, Inc. and LG Chem, Ltd. v. Tommy 

Morgan

Appellate case number: 01-19-00665-CV

Trial court case number: 100728-CV

Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria County

Appellants, LG Chem America, Inc. and LG Chem, Ltd., filed motions for rehearing 

and for en banc reconsideration of the Court’s December 15, 2020 opinion. The Court 

requested a response to appellants’ motions from appellee, Tommy Morgan, by May 25, 

2021. 

Appellee has filed an unopposed motion to extend time until June 25, 2021, to file 

a response. The Court grants appellee’s unopposed motion to extend time. Appellee shall 

file a response to appellants’ motions for rehearing and for en banc reconsideration, if any, 

no later than June 25, 2021.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 3, 2021