alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) 

 

I, Jan H. Egberts, M.D., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NovaDel Pharma Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [intentionally omitted] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

| Date:  May 15, 2007 | By:    | /S/ JAN H. EGBERTS                    |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                |   | Jan H. Egberts, M.D.                  |
|                |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, David W.Whitwell, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this report onForm 10-K of IWT Tesoro Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Paragraph omittedpursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a) All significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial report.
| Date: April 2, 2007 | By:                     | /s/ David  W. Whitwell. |
|---------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                | David W. Whitwell,      |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income found on pages 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               2,009   
<SECURITIES>                                             0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,098   
<ALLOWANCES>                                            30   
<INVENTORY>                                          8,922   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    14,797   
<PP&E>                                               2,022   
<DEPRECIATION>                                          89   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      33,011   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,729   
<BONDS>                                              4,453   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0   
<PREFERRED>                                              1   
<COMMON>                                                 3   
<OTHER-SE>                                          24,825   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        33,011   
<SALES>                                              7,880   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     7,880   
<CGS>                                                6,153   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,153   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       918   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      86   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        667   
<INCOME-TAX>                                           327   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    340   
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0   
<CHANGES>                                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                                           340   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.02
                                                    


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alberto DiBella, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 20, 2011














/s/ Alberto DiBella


Alberto DiBella


Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PALADYNE CORP. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                             249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      816
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,200
<PP&E>                                             452
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (210)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                         657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,316
<SALES>                                          3,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,724
<CGS>                                            2,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (85)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (85)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (85)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5873 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, 

Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5873 EH

1 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN RHETT W. SCHILLER POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in 

4 Waterford, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. 

10 Schiller Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5873 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostW. Schiller Post Office’’. in Waterford, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Rhett al Service located at 218 North Milwaukee Street
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS W. HYSELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-16970

D.C. No. 1:10-cv-01233-AWIGBC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Douglas W. Hysell appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging violations of the Racketeer

Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A,

FILED

MAY 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-16970

Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000), and under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2), Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). 

We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Hysell’s action because the allegations

in his amended complaint do not set forth facts demonstrating a pattern of

racketeering activity required to state a claim for violations of, or conspiracy to

violate, RICO. See Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc., 625 F.3d 550, 557 (9th Cir.

2010) (listing elements of a RICO claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), and explaining

that, to plead a RICO conspiracy claim under § 1962(d), the plaintiff must first

adequately plead a substantive violation of RICO); see also Silva v. Di Vittorio,

658 F.3d 1090, 1105-06 (9th Cir. 2011) (prisoner’s allegations of alleged

constitutional violations do not qualify as predicate acts to establish a pattern of

racketeering activity for the purposes of a RICO claim). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, I, Craig J. Tuttle, Chief Executive
Officer of Transgenomic, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Transgenomic, Inc.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CRAIG J. TUTTLECraig J. TuttlePresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 14, 2009

A signed original of the certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Transgenomic, Inc. and will be retained by Transgenomic, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



25
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5910 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize the Secretary 

of Homeland Security to issue rules that designate no-fly zones in the 

vicinity of certain nuclear power plants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2010 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize 

the Secretary of Homeland Security to issue rules that 

designate no-fly zones in the vicinity of certain nuclear 

power plants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NO-FLY ZONES IN THE VICIN4 ITY OF CERTAIN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title II of the Homeland Security 

6 Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121 et seq.) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following: 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5910 IH

1 ‘‘Subtitle E—Miscellaneous 

2 Provisions 

3 ‘‘SEC. 241. DESIGNATION OF NO-FLY ZONES. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may issue rules 

5 that designate a no-fly zone in the vicinity of any covered 

6 nuclear power plant and prohibiting the operation of air7 craft in such zone. 

8 ‘‘(b) COVERED NUCLEAR POWER PLANT.—In this 

9 section the term ‘covered nuclear power plant’ means a 

10 nuclear power plant within 50 miles of which there reside 

11 more than 15 million individuals, as determined by the 

12 most recent census of the United States.’’. 

13 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

14 in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the 

15 end of the items relating to title II the following: 

‘‘Subtitle E—Miscellaneous Provisions 

‘‘Sec. 241. Designation of no-fly zones.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### BREWSTER v. STARKWEATHER et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

January 18, 1894.)

Action by Horace C. Brewster against Chauncey C. Starkweather and others.

No opinion. Defendants’ motion for a new trial denied, with costs, and judgment ordered for the plaintiff on the verdict.
#               G-28, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Accredited Representative

Use this form to provide information about your eligibility to act on behalf of an applicant, petitioner, or respondent.

## Forms and Document Downloads

Form G-28  (PDF, 392.2 KB)

Instructions for Form G-28  (PDF, 210.4 KB)

## Form Details

09/17/18. We will publish a new edition of this form soon. In the meantime, you may continue using the 09/17/18 and 05/23/18 editions despite the expiration date. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

File Form G-28 with the related application, petition, or appeal.

You can find the filing fee for Form G-28 by visiting our Fee Schedule page.  

**Filing Tips:** Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.**Also, be sure to have the applicant, petitioner, requestor, or respondent sign the form! We will reject any unsigned form.

                      - Filing Your Form G-28

04/03/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-2990MN

_____________ Karl G. Granse, citizen of * Minnesota, in propria persona, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United Sta tes * District Court for the United States of America; * District of Minnesota. Department of the Treasury, * sued as Department of Treasury; * [UNPUBLISHED] Internal Revenue Service; Park * Drive Partnership, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: April 22, 1997 Filed: May 1, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Karl G. Granse appeals the district court’s order granting t he appellees’ motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. Grans e bro ught this action after the Internal Revenue Service levied o n and sold his real property to satisfy jeopardy assessments having to do with Granse’s delinquent federal taxes. Having carefull y reviewedthe record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for th e reasons stated by the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21303-21304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9835]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-04]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Uvalde, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at Uvalde, TX

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 65 FR 8044 is 
effective 0901 UTC, June 15, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on February 17, 
2000, (65 FR 8044). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on June 15, 2000. No adverse comments

[[Page 21304]]

were received, and, thus, this action confirms that this direct final 
rule will be effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on April 12, 2000.
Robert N. Stevens,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 00-9835 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M