alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                 Certification
           pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Northern Rock plc, a public limited liability company
incorporated and registered in England and Wales (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                     /s/ Adam J. Applegarth
Date: May 25, 2004
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Name:   Adam J. Applegarth
                                     Title:  Chief Executive Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2

                                 Certification
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Northern Rock plc, a public limited liability company
incorporated and registered in England and Wales (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Robert F. Bennett
Date: May 25, 2004
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Name:   Robert F. Bennett
                                      Title:  Group Finance Director

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 99-8002

IN RE PAUL D. GIAMANCO, MEMBER OF THE BAR

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and STEINBERG and GREENE, Judges

O R D E R

Attorney Paul D. Giamanco (the respondent) was admitted to practice before this Court on

December 28, 1993, based on his admission to practice in the State of Illinois and his good standing

as a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States.

This Court received a certified copy of an August 23, 1999, order of the Supreme Court of

the United States disbarring the respondent from the practice of law in that Court. The respondent

has failed to respond to this Court's December 1, 1999, show-cause order regarding proposed

discipline reciprocal with the disbarment imposed by the Supreme Court of the United States.

In addition, the respondent has failed to respond to this Court's August 26, 1999, show-cause

order regarding proposed discipline reciprocal with a two-year suspension imposed by the Supreme

Court of the State of Illinois. On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the respondent is DISBARRED from practice before this Court.

DATED: March 15, 2000 PER CURIAM.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 6696

PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR. ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VDOC; GARY BASS, Regional Director of Operations for the Central Region of VDOC; L. F. SCHILLING, Health Services Director for VDOC Medical Services; J. E. PARKS, Director of Offender Management Services for VDOC; KEITH DAWKINS, Supervisor; GAIL JONES, working in VDOC offender management; H. PONTON, Warden; J. ROYSTER, Operations Manager; DIXON, M.D., Medical Director at NCC; L. HIGHTOWER, Supervisor of the NCC Medical Dept and the Nurses; E. L. WILLIS, Treatment Program Supervisor; D. BROCCHARD, Psychologist at NCC; MS. SARGENT, Mental Health Counselor; MS. LEFEVERS, Un it Manager; MR. MOICZEK, Institutional Investigator; A. JAMES, Grievance Coordinator; M. PUGH, Sgt., Supervisor of the NCC Property Office; J. TERRY, Counselor; MS. SPENCE, Counselor; JOSEPH TEEFEY, Institutional Attorney at NCC; A. BRYANT ,
Defendants

- Appellees ,
and

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ,
Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith , District Judge. ( 2:15

- cv

- 00439

- RBS

- DEM )

Submitted : April 4 , 2019 Decided: April 9, 20192 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, V irginia, for Appellee Dixon

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order s denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Thompson v. Clarke , No

. 2:15

- cv

- 00439

- RBS

- DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 201 7; May 9,
2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



Stratus Services Group, Inc.Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002 
  (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the quarterly report of Stratus Services Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Maltzman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                     
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Dated: |  | August 16, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael A. Maltzman
|------ |  | --------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|       |  |                 |  |     |  | Michael A. Maltzman    
|       |  |                 |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



---
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 12-07

IN RE: FEE SCHEDULE O R D E R

ALL FEES MUST BE PAID BY CHECK OR MONEY ORDER. CASH IS NOT ACCEPTED.

It is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 45(f), that the following revised schedule of fees approved by

the Court is announced. 

For filing Notice of Appeal or Petition for Extraordinary Relief in this Court, 

but not when the Court orders case redocketing for its administrative convenience $50.00 

For filing Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

(fee set by that court, payable to this Court) 450.00

For reproducing a paper copy from original documents or from microfiche or 

microfilm reproductions of original records, per copy page .50*

For each microfiche sheet of film or microfilm jacket copy of any Court record,

when available 3.00 

For reproducing audio or video tape recording, including cost of materials 15.00 

For searching Court records, per name or item searched 15.00*

For retrieval of a Court record from a Federal Records Center or National Archives 25.00 

For certifying a document or paper, whether certification is made directly on 

the document or by separate instrument 5.00 

For application for admission to practice before the Court 30.00 

For a certificate of admission to practice, suitable for framing:

attorney 40.60#

nonattorney 34.50#

For a Certificate of Good Standing 5.00

DATED: May 3, 2007 FOR THE COURT:

* Indicate services on behalf of the United States

 if information is available through electronic access NORMAN Y. HERRING

 Clerk of the Court

# Changes effected by this Order
Exhibit
10.2





STONERIDGE,
INC.


LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN


AMENDMENT
TO


RESTRICTED
SHARES GRANT AGREEMENT




Recitals




1.           Stoneridge,
Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”) and _______________ (“Grantee”) are
parties to a Restricted Shares Grant Agreement dated March 2, 2008 (the
“RSGA”).




2.           Pursuant
to the pursuant to the terms and conditions RSGA the Grantee was granted Common
Shares, without par value, of the Company (the “Restricted
Shares”).




3.           The
grant of Restricted Shares under the RSGA was comprised of two separate mutually
exclusive parts, Award I (time-based restricted shares) and Award II
(performance-based restricted shares).




4.           In
the event of a Change in Control the Award II Restricted Shares conditioned the
lapse of the risk of forfeiture (vesting) on the price of the Company’s Common
Shares, calculated by the average of the closing price of the Common Shares for
the ten trading days immediately preceding the date of the Change in Control,
being equal to or greater than $6.05 per share.




5.           The
$6.05 price floor condition in the event of a Change in Control was a holdover
in the form of grant agreement from a prior year and Compensation Committee has
determined that it should not be applied to awards of restricted common shares
made in 2008.




Amendment




The RSGA is hereby amended by deleting
subsection 5(b) in its entirety and replacing it with the
following:




“5(b)        a
Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the Plan); subject to the
proviso below, or”




The
remainder of the RSGA shall remain unchanged.


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its corporate name to be subscribed by
its duly authorized officer as of the 3rd day of May, 2009.




STONERIDGE,
      INC.ByJohn
      CoreyThe
      foregoing is hereby accepted.(Signature)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5769 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5769

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the seizure 
 and forfeiture of real property used or intended to be used in alien 
                               smuggling.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2010

  Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Bilbray) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the seizure 
 and forfeiture of real property used or intended to be used in alien 
                               smuggling.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Drop Houses Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE.

    Section 274(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1324(b)(1)) is amended by inserting ``any real property that was used 
or was intended to be used in the commission of such violation,'' 
before ``and any property traceable''.
                                 <all>
```
#### BARNARD, Appellant, v. BROWN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

March 27, 1894.)

Action by Persons S. Barnard against Mary A Brown and another.

Argued before DWIGHT, P. J., and LEWIS, HAIGHT, and BRADLEY, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 14-07

IN RE: 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) and Sanders v. Nicholson, __ F.3d __, No. 06-7001, 2007 WL

1427720 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2007). 

 Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN,

 LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

 O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7264(a) and Rule 2 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure

(Rules), the Court has determined that there is a need to issue a general order in light of Sanders v.

Nicholson, __ F.3d __, No. 06-7001, 2007 WL 1427720 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2007). In Sanders, the

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held (1) that any error in the Secretary of

Veterans Affairs' compliance with notice under 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) or 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b)(1)

should be presumed prejudicial to the claimant, and (2) that the Secretary has the burden of rebutting

this presumption. Sanders, __ F.3d at __, 2007 WL 1427720, at *10. Therefore, the Court will

suspend the application of certain Rules in cases where the appellant has alleged an error under

section 5103(a) and/or § 3.159(b)(1), and will direct appropriate proceedings. This order does not

preclude the Court from disposing of a pending case prior to the expiration of the time allowed in

this order. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that, as to any appeal in which a merits decision has not yet been rendered, the

Secretary may file, and serve under Rule 25(c), not later than 20 days after the date of this order, a

memorandum of law on the effect of Sanders, supra, on the pending appeal. If the time for filing

the Secretary's brief has not expired by the date of this order, the Secretary may include these

matters in his brief. If the time for filing the Secretary's brief has expired, or will expire within 20

days after the date of this order, and the appellant raised in his brief an error with respect to section

5103(a) and/or § 3.159(b)(1), the Secretary may file, within 20 days after the date of this order, a

separate memorandum of law addressing these matters. It is further

ORDERED that, not later than 20 days after the Secretary files any memorandum of law, the

appellant may file, and serve under Rule 25(c), a memorandum of law addressing these matters. If

the Secretary does not file a memorandum of law, the appellant may file a memorandum not later

than 40 days after the date of this order. It is further

ORDERED that any deadline established by Court order in a particular case for filing of

supplemental pleadings regarding the above Sanders-related matters remains in full force and is not

altered by this miscellaneous order. It is further

ORDERED that any memorandum of law filed pursuant to this order must conform to the

page and typeface limitations in Rule 32(b) and (g) for reply briefs. It is further
ORDERED that Rule 30(b) is suspended as to Sanders, supra.

DATED: July 3, 2007 BY THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. LaPerch,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  August
      10, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      William G. LaPerchWilliam
      G. LaPerch
                Chief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allergy Research Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dr. Stephen A. Levine, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 8, 2006



                             By: /s/ Stephen A. Levine
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Dr. Stephen A. Levine
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Allergy Research Group, Inc. and
will be retained by Allergy Research Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Examining Documents

You must examine the documentation your employee presents to complete Section 2 of Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification. You are not required to be a document expert. You must accept documents that reasonably appear to be genuine and relate to the person presenting them. However, if your new employee provides a document that does not reasonably appear to be genuine and relate to them, you must reject that document and ask for other documents that satisfy the requirements of Form I-9.

*Note:**This chart only applies to newly hired employees.*

Employers who partner with the IMAGE program receive training and education from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on proper hiring procedures, fraudulent document detection and anti-discrimination laws. Employers may also visit the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER) website for more information on anti-discrimination laws and employment verification.

                        - Handbook for Employers M-274, Guidance for Completing Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification Form
                        - Take a Free Webinar

07/10/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
# How do I Unlock My Online Account?

Contact Us

If you enter your password incorrectly multiple times, you will get a notification saying you are locked out of your account. Wait 20 minutes for the system to reset, and then try logging in again.

If you still cannot access your USCIS online account, send us a message using this link: my.uscis.gov/account/v1/needhelp.

After filling out a short form you will see a drop-down menu of technical support options. Please select “**I need help with unlocking my account.**" Then click “**Send Message.**”

Our Technical Help Desk will email you, usually within 10 business days, with instructions on how to access to your account.

10/06/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

 

In connection with the Annual Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, HenryJ. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 orotherwise subject to liability under this section.  This certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expresslyincorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated: August 22, 2005 | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.     |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer        |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Gregory Hughs, Respondent, v Eileen T. Gold, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

— In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, Eileen T. Gold appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), dated November 21, 1985, which denied her motion to strike certain paragraphs of the plaintiff’s bill of particulars as nonresponsive.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s responses to the appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars are sufficiently responsive under the circumstances of this case *(see, Cirelli v Victory Mem. Hosp.,*45 AD2d 856; *Patterson v Jewish Hosp. & Med. Center,*94 Misc 2d 680; *affd*65 AD2d 553). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.