alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20500]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreement to 
the Secretary by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3467515746514055464d745259571a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eab98f89988f9e8b9893aa8c8789c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most 
helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreement are 
available through the Commission's website (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aedadccfcacbcfc0cfc2d7ddc7ddeec8c3cd80c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="720600131617131c131e0b011b0132141f115c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Agreement No.: 201373.
    Agreement Name: CMA/HLAG Vessel Sharing Agreement.
    Parties: CMA CGM S.A. and Hapag Lloyd AG.
    Filing Party: Draughn Arbona; CMA CGM.
    Synopsis: The agreement would authorize the parties to share 
vessels with one another and cooperate in liner service between the 
U.S. East Coast on the one hand, and Canada, India, Pakistan, the 
United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Morocco, Spain and Malta on 
the other hand.
    Proposed Effective Date: 10/25/21.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/50509.

    Agreement No.: 201374.
    Agreement Name: CMA CGM/Network Shipping Ltd. Central America--U.S. 
West Coast Service Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: Network Shipping, Ltd. and CMA CGM S.A.
    Filing Party: Draughn Arbona; CMA CGM.
    Synopsis: This agreement authorizes Network Shipping Ltd. (``NWS'') 
to charter space to CMA CGM on vessels operated by NWS in the trade 
between Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the U.S. West Coast.
    Proposed Effective Date: 9/16/2021.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/50510.

    Dated: September 17, 2021.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-20500 Filed 9-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Lewis Gould, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Q.E.P. Co., Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

DATE: June 24, 2009



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Lewis Gould                     
|Lewis Gould                         
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing operator ofThe Campbell Fund Trust (the “Trust”), certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
E 2

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland     Bruce L. Cleland    Chief Executive Officer    November 8, 2006  
E 3
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5798 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5798

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic in Craig, 
 Colorado, as the ``Major William Edward Adams Department of Veterans 
                           Affairs Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2010

 Mr. Salazar (for himself, Mr. Polis of Colorado, Mr. Perlmutter, Ms. 
   DeGette, Ms. Markey of Colorado, Mr. Lamborn, and Mr. Coffman of 
  Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic in Craig, 
 Colorado, as the ``Major William Edward Adams Department of Veterans 
                           Affairs Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TELEHEALTH CLINIC, 
              CRAIG, COLORADO.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic in Craig, 
Colorado, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 
and designated as the ``Major William Edward Adams Department of 
Veterans Affairs Clinic''. Any reference to such clinic in any law, 
regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Major William Edward 
Adams Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Huile' Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tricia A. Willis,
as Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 24, 2003                          /s/ TRICIA A. WILLIS
                                              ________________________
                                                  Tricia A. Willis
                                                  Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.01CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER      I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc. as managingoperator of The Campbell Fund Trust, certify that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30,2006 of The Campbell Fund Trust fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of The Campbell Fund Trust .         THE CAMPBELL FUND TRUST    By: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing operator           By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland       Bruce L. Cleland      Chief Executive Officer      August 14, 2006  
E 4
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covad Communications Group,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Mark A. Richman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                         COVAD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.

                                         By:         /s/ MARK A. RICHMAN
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                       Mark A. Richman
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 17, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Catalano, Appellant.

— Main, J. P.

In *People v Robideau*(121 AD2d 769), we reversed the conviction of defendant’s codefendant on the ground that County Court improperly limited the cross-examination of a prosecution witness. We stated there that *People v Sandoval*(34 NY2d 371) may not be used to limit the cross-examination of a nondefendant witness, and that such a witness may be cross-examined with regard to any criminal, vicious or disgraceful acts having a bearing on his credibility. As defendant in this case was tried jointly with his codefendant, our determination in *Robideau*is equally applicable to the present case. Accordingly, defendant’s conviction should be reversed and he should be afforded a new trial.

Judgment reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Albany County for a new trial. Main, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                        YIELDUP INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  THREE MONTHS       THREE MONTHS        SIX MONTHS         SIX MONTHS
                                     ENDED              ENDED              ENDED               ENDED
                                 JUNE 30, 1997      JUNE 30, 1996      JUNE 30, 1997       JUNE 30, 1996
                                 ---------------    ---------------    ---------------    ----------------
<S>                                  <C>                <C>              <C>                 <C>         

Net Loss                             ($756,203)         ($842,875)       ($1,739,521)        ($1,528,492)
                                 ===============    ===============    ===============    ================

Common Stock                          4,879,040          3,406,057          4,146,586           3,405,679
Preferred Stock                               -                  -                  -                   -
                                 ---------------    ---------------    ---------------    ----------------
                                      4,879,040          3,406,057          4,146,586           3,405,679

Number of common stock issued
and stock options granted in
accordance with SAB No. 83                    -                  -                  -                   -
                                 ---------------    ---------------    ---------------    ----------------
             Total                    4,879,040          3,406,057          4,146,586           3,405,679
                                 ===============    ===============    ===============    ================

Net loss per share                      ($0.15)            ($0.25)            ($0.42)             ($0.45)
                                 ===============    ===============    ===============    ================

</TABLE>
Eligible to Naturalize Fact Sheet: 

San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 

Data Source: Office of Homeland Security Statistics 

48,650 Eligible to Naturalize Created February 2024 

This fact sheet provides information on select characteristics of people with Lawful Permanent Residence (LPR) status, also known 

as Green Card holders. Generally, an LPR is eligible to become a naturalized U.S. citizen after meeting certain requirements.

Providing more information on the eligible to naturalize population is in keeping with the Executive Order on Restoring Faith in Our 

Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans (E.O. 14012). 

Throughout our history, the United States has welcomed immigrants from all over the world who have helped shape and define our 

country. Granting citizenship to eligible lawful permanent residents is vital to our nation’s security, economic prosperity, and a future 

built on the principles of the U.S. Constitution. Some of the benefits to becoming a U.S. citizen include the right to vote, traveling 

with a U.S. passport, bringing family members to the U.S., applying for federal jobs, and becoming an elected official. 

Top Countries of Birth 

Mexico 

22,560 

Philippines 

2,080 

India 

1,910 

Iraq 

1,600 

Vietnam 

1,190 

Burma 

940 

Number of Years in LPR Status 

Generally, a Lawful Permanent 

Resident (or LPR) is eligible to 

become a naturalized U.S. 

citizen after meeting certain 

requirements such as length of 

time in LPR status; the length 

of time depends on the class of 

admission they were given as 

an LPR. 

6,400 5,800 5,770 5,780 5,590 

4,980 4,800 4,820 

2,520 

1,350 

840 

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 

Number of Years in LPR Status 
LPRs by Category of Admission 

1,69

Other 

0

After meeting 

certain eligibility 

requirements, a 

person can gain 

LPR status through 

employment, family 

relationships, the 

diversity visa 

program, or as a 

refugee or asylee, 

among other ways. 

28,230 

Immediate relatives 

of U.S. citizens 

770 

Diversity 

6,630 

Refugees and Asylees 

6,780 

Family-sponsored 

preferences 

4,560 

Employment-based preferences 

Concentration of Eligible to Naturalize in the Region 

 

 

93% of the eligible to naturalize population 

resides in one county. 

44,240 Bexar County, TX 

1,470 Comal County, TX 

1,400 Guadalupe County, TX 

570 Kendall County, TX 

110 Bandera County, TX 

<10 Atascosa County, TX 

<10 Medina County, TX 

<10 Wilson County, TX 

Eligible to Naturalize by Age 

75 and Over <10 

60-74 5,680 

50-59 7,350 

40-49 10,580 

30-39 13,420 

20-29 8,420 

15-19 <10 

Eligible to Naturalize by Gender 

55% 

of persons 

eligible 

were 

Female 

45% 

of persons 

eligible 

were Male 

1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10. Numbers may not sum to totals due to rounding.
#### FURMAN et ux., Respondents, v. FURMAN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 27, 1896.)

Action by Garrit Furman and wife against William H. Furman and others.

No opinion. Motion to resettle order denied. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 76.
# "How Do I" Guides for Nonimmigrants

#### Archived Content

The information on this page is out of date. However, some of the content may still be useful, so we have archived the page.

The items below explain how nonimmigrants can accomplish specific tasks through USCIS.
                - How Do I Extend My Nonimmigrant Stay in the United States? (PDF, 121.18 KB)
                - How Do I Change to Another Nonimmigrant Status? (PDF, 482.69 KB)
                - How Do I Replace a Form I-94, Arrival-Departure Record? (PDF, 584.42 KB)

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

(18 U.S.C. 1350) 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaDel Pharma Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Steven B. Ratoff, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael E. Spicer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date:  November 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ STEVEN B. RATOFF                          |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Steven B. Ratoff                              |
|                     |   | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     |   |                                          |
| Date:  November 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL E. SPICER                         |
|                     |   | Michael E. Spicer                             |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer                       |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 4-01

In Re: RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and FARLEY, HOLDAWAY,

IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the authority of 38 U.S.C. §§ 7263(b) and 7264(a) and consistent with 28 U.S.C.

§ 2071(b), the Court has adopted changes to Rules 32(g), 35(a) and (d)(1), and 45(i) and (j) of its

Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Court has benefitted from public comment and from the views

of its Rules Advisory Committee. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the attached changes to Rules 32(g), 35(a) and (d)(1), and 45(i) and (j) are

published and will be effective September 4, 2001.

DATED: August 24, 2001 BY THE COURT:

KENNETH B. KRAMER

Chief Judge

Attachment
Attachment to Miscellaneous Order No. 4-01 (only affected subsections shown)

RULE 32. FORM OF BRIEFS, APPENDICES, AND OTHER PAPERS

(g) Page Limits and Number of Copies. Except by permission of the Court or as limited

by Rule 47, principal briefs may not exceed 30 pages and reply briefs may not exceed 15 pages, not

counting the table of contents; the table of citations; any appendix containing superseded statutes,

rules, and regulations, and unpublished authorities; and the certificate of service. An original and

three copies of all papers must be filed with the Clerk, but the Court may require that additional

copies be furnished. But see Rule 25 concerning fax filings.

RULE 35. MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION, OR FOR

DECISION BY A PANEL OR BY THE FULL COURT

(a) Motion for Reconsideration. A party in a case decided by a single judge may move for

reconsideration by the single judge. A party in a case dismissed by the Clerk pursuant to Rule 45(i)

may move for reconsideration by the Clerk. A party in a case decided by a panel may move for

reconsideration by the panel. A party in a case decided by the full Court may move for

reconsideration by the full Court.

* * * * * * * * * *

(d) Time for Motion.

(1) A motion for Clerk reconsideration or single-judge decision, or both, and for single-judge

reconsideration or a panel decision, or both, must be filed within 21 days (51 days if the motion is

filed by a person located outside a state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands)

after the date of the Clerk's or single judge's decision.

RULE 45. DUTIES OF CLERK

(i) Sua Sponte Dismissal of Cases. The Clerk may dismiss a case for the appellant's failure

to pay the filing fee or to file a brief. If a party's motion for reconsideration by the Clerk of a case

dismissed by the Clerk under this subsection is not granted by the Clerk, the matter must be referred

for decision by a judge.

(j) Construction of Rules in Self-Representation Cases. The Clerk shall liberally construe

the rules as they apply to appellants representing themselves.