alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5760 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5760

   To expand eligibility for Pell grants to certain students who are 
 pursuing a postbaccalaureate professional certification or licensing 
            credential required for employment as a teacher.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2010

 Mr. Melancon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To expand eligibility for Pell grants to certain students who are 
 pursuing a postbaccalaureate professional certification or licensing 
            credential required for employment as a teacher.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PELL GRANT ELIGIBILITY FOR POSTBACCALAUREATE TEACHER 
              CERTIFICATION.

    Section 401(c)(4) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1070a(c)(4)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``unless there is not an institution of higher education 
located within 45 miles of the principal place of residence of the 
student that offers such a postbaccalaureate program but does not offer 
a baccalaureate degree in education''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Cygni Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 30, 2005

/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R OB ER T E. W HITE, a

n individual, a

n d a ll othe rs sim i la

rly situa te d, Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt, v. SQUARE, INC . , a De la

ware c orporation, De fe nda nt-Appe l le e . No. 16-17137 D.C . No. 3:15-c v-04539-JST M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Jon S. Tiga

r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d a nd Subm itte d M arc h

14, 2018 Subm ission W ithdra

wn June 7, 2018 R e subm itte d Se pte m

be r 23, 2019 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : PAEZ a

nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s, a nd VITALIANO, ** Distric t Judge . Pla intiff R obe rt E. W

hite a ppe a ls the distric t

c o urt’ s dism issa l of his c la im unde r C a lifornia ’ s Unruh Ac t ba se d on la c k of sta tutory sta nding. Ac c o rding to 

# FIL ED SEP 23 2019 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The Honora

ble Eric N. Vita lia

no, Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the Ea ste rn Distric t of Ne w York, sitting by de signa t ion.White ’ s c om pla int, W hite visite d Squa

re ’ s we b site inte nding to use its se rvic e s, e nc ounte re d te rm s a

nd c o n ditions tha

t a l le ge dly

de nie d him

e qua l a c c e ss to its se rvic e s, a

nd the n le ft the we bsite without e nte ring into a n a gre e m e nt with Squa

re . Se e W hite v . Square , Inc ., 891 F.3d 1174, 1175-1176 (9th C ir. 2018). Thedistric t c ourt he ld tha

t White la c ke d sta

nding unde r the Unruh Ac t, a nd White a

ppe a le d. B e c a use C a lifornia la

w in this a

re a wa s unse ttle d, we c e rtifie d a que s tion re spe c ting this issue

to the C a lifornia Supre m e C ourt, se e W h ite v . Square

, Inc . , 891 F.3d 1174 , whic h subse que ntly re sponde d, se e W

hite v . Square , Inc . , 446 P.3d 276 (C a l. 2019). Apply ing the C a lifornia

Supre m e C ourt’ s ruling, the distric t c o urt e rre d in c onc luding tha

t White la c ke d sta

tutory sta nding. W hite suffic ie ntly

a lle g e d tha

t he

“ visite d the busine ss’ s we b site , e nc ounte re d disc rim inatory te rm s, a

nd inte nde d to m ake use of the busine ss’ s se rvic e s.” Se eW hite v . Square , Inc . , 446 P.3d a

t 283. Ac c ordingly , White ha s sta nding to pursue his Unruh Ac t c la i m . Id . RE V E RSE D and RE M ANDE D

2
# USCIS Reopens Field Office in Tegucigalpa, Honduras

03/22/2024

**WASHINGTON—**U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced the reopening of an international field office in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. The Tegucigalpa Field Office will focus on increasing refugee processing capacity and helping reunite individuals with their family members already in the United States.

“Reopening the Tegucigalpa Field Office establishes USCIS’ presence and expertise in a critical location in the Western Hemisphere and is part of our commitment to the Biden-Harris administration’s efforts to facilitate safe and orderly lawful pathways and meet our humanitarian mission,” said USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou. “USCIS is dedicated to fairness, integrity, and respect for all we serve, and our renewed presence in Honduras is part of an effort to expand USCIS’ footprint outside the United States to more effectively support that mission.”

The Tegucigalpa Field Office will be located within the U.S. Embassy in Honduras. USCIS staff will assume responsibility for agency workloads currently handled by the U.S. Department of State Consular Section. These include interviews and processing for Form I-730, Refugee/Asylee Relative Petition, fingerprinting beneficiaries of T nonimmigrant applications and U nonimmigrant and VAWA petitions, and essential fraud detection activities, including document verification, site visits, and interviews. Additionally, reopening the USCIS Tegucigalpa Field Office will help support the U.S. government’s effort to resettle refugees from the Americas, as outlined in the June 2022 Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection.

Services at the office in Tegucigalpa will be available only by appointment. USCIS will update its International Immigration Offices webpage to include information about the field office, its services, and appointments.

USCIS’ renewed presence in Honduras is part of an effort to restore its footprint outside the United States to meet its workload needs and the needs of USCIS partners. The opening of the field office in Tegucigalpa makes it the ninth USCIS international field office. Currently, there are international field offices in Beijing, China; Guangzhou, China; Guatemala City, Guatemala; Havana, Cuba; Mexico City, Mexico; Nairobi, Kenya; New Delhi, India; and San Salvador, El Salvador.

03/22/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-3 (No. 333-75798) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-115183 and 333-49012) of EndwaveCorporation of our reports dated March 13, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements,financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappear in this Form 10-K./s/ Burr, Pilger, & Mayer LLPSan Jose, California
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinnacle Resources, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Glen R. Gamble, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Glen R. Gamble
-----------------------------
Glen R. Gamble
Chief Executive Officer

October 24, 2007


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinnacle Resources, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert A. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Robert A. Hildebrand
-----------------------------
Robert A. Hildebrand
Chief Financial Officer

October 24, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          24,688
<SECURITIES>                                    22,520
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                       539
<INVENTORY>                                        213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,675
<PP&E>                                          11,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,449
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,337
<SALES>                                         23,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,270
<CGS>                                            5,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,450)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,365
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19



</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries

                                     State of
Subsidiary                           Incorporation       Doing Business AS

Hipstyle.com, Inc.                   Delaware            Hipstyle.com, Inc.

CCS International, Ltd.              Delaware            CCS International, Ltd.

Counter Spy Shop of Mayfair
  London, Ltd.                       DC                  Counter Spy Shop of
                                                          Mayfair London, Ltd.

Counter Spy Shop of Mayfair
  London, Ltd., Inc.                 Florida             Counter Spy Shop of
                                                          Mayfair London, Ltd

Counter Spy Shop of Mayfair
  London, Ltd.                       CA                  Counter Spy Shop of
                                                          Mayfair London, Ltd.

Spy Shop Ltd.                        NY                  Counter Spy Shop
                                                          of Delaware

Security Design Group, Inc.          NY                  Security Design
                                                          Group, Inc.

                                       12
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 11-07

IN RE: THE MATTER OF THE RETIREMENT OF MARLENE DAVIS

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN,

LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Marlene Davis was appointed as the Court’s first Administrative Manager on July 30, 1989. She

was later appointed as Deputy Executive Officer and served superbly in both capacities until her

retirement on April 28, 2007. During these 18 years, she played an instrumental and vital role in the

creation and operation of this, the Nation's newest national judicial tribunal.

As the Administrative Manager, Ms. Davis used her considerable talents, resourcefulness,

creativity, common sense, and energy to ensure that the Court came into being smoothly. Her

exceptional attention to detail and organizational ability guided the Court’s initial build-out at 625

Indiana Avenue and a seamless move into that location. She showed exceptional skill in fostering

team loyalty among her staff illustrated when, as Deputy Executive Officer, she oversaw the

renovations and the myriad details attendant to the turnover of six judges in two years. She again

showed her professionalism and tenacity when she shepherded the three-year project of upgrading

security in the garage and first floor lobby. The Court’s Continuation of Operations Plan is the latest

example of her resourcefulness, planning skills, and tenacity in dealing with various government

agencies. The overwhelming success of the first Court Judicial Conference, and five succeeding

Conferences, resulted from Ms. Davis’ organizational and managerial skills as the Conference

Administrative Coordinator. The fact that Ms. Davis has received an outstanding performance award

in each year she was eligible illustrates her overwhelming value to the Court, and the respect she

garners from all who are associated with her. 

Ms. Davis has been a trusted advisor to the Clerk and friend and trusted mentor to the entire

Court family. She has earned the highest respect of all who have been privileged to benefit from her

intelligence and dedication. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, that Marlene Davis, will take with her our gratitude for the years of outstanding

service she has rendered to the Court, our admiration for her many accomplishments, the warmth of

our continued friendship, and our best wishes.

DATED: April 27, 2007 BY THE COURT:

William P. Greene, Jr.

Chief Judge
# How USCIS Processes a Form I-589 Filed After Removal Proceedings are Dismissed or Terminated

02/12/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
# "How Do I" Guides for Employers

The items below explain how employers can accomplish specific tasks through USCIS.
                - How Do I Hire a Foreign National for Short-Term Employment in the United States? (PDF, 741.07 KB)
                - How Do I Sponsor an Employee for U.S. Permanent Resident Status? (PDF, 707.35 KB)
                - How Do I Complete Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification? (PDF, 697.17 KB)

01/31/2014

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
George v. McDonough, 2022 WL 129504 (U.S.) (2022)

© 2022 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

2022 WL 129504 (U.S.)

WESTLAW BULLETIN

U.S. Supreme Court

January 14, 2022

Veterans: Challenging denial of disability benefits after invalidation of VA's regulation addressing statutory presumption of

soundness -- Certiorari Granted

The United States Supreme Court has granted a veteran's certiorari petition, which presents the question whether the denial 

by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) of a veteran's claim for benefits, in reliance on an agency interpretation that is

later deemed invalid under the plain text of the statutory provisions in effect at the time of the denial, is the kind of “clear and 

unmistakable error” that the veteran may invoke to challenge the VA's decision.

The petitioner, a Marine Corps veteran, sought disability benefits for schizophrenia, but the claim was denied, based on lack 

of service connection. Under a statutory presumption of soundness, 38 U.S.C.A. § 1111, a veteran is presumed to have been in 

sound condition, at entry to service, as to disorders that are not identified on the veteran's entrance medical examination, but 

the presumption can be rebutted by clear and unmistakable evidence that the disorder existed before acceptance and enrollment

and was not aggravated by service.

At the time of the denial of benefits, the VA's implementing regulation, 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(b), had allowed the statutory 

presumption of soundness to be rebutted based on clear and unmistakable evidence that the disorder existed prior to service, 

without requiring clear and unmistakable evidence of lack of aggravation by service. In 2003, the VA invalidated the regulation 

because it conflicted with the language of § 1111, and in 2004, the Federal Circuit confirmed the correctness of the VA's 

changed understanding of the statute. In 2005, the VA amended the regulation, to require evidence of both a preexisting 

condition and no aggravation.

A veteran who shows clear and unmistakable error in the denial of benefits may be entitled to benefits retroactive to the 

date of the original claim.

In the decision below, the Federal Circuit cited circuit precedent for the proposition that clear and unmistakable error must

be analyzed based on the law as it was understood at the time of the original VA decision, and it cannot arise from a subsequent 

change in the law, or interpretation thereof. (Case below: George v. McDonough, 991 F.3d 1227 (C.A.Fed. 2021).)

George v. McDonough

2022 WL 129504

(U.S.)

End of Document © 2022 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government 

Works.

Reprinted from Westlaw with permission of Thomson Reuters.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ixia Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 5, 2008
    /s/ Errol GinsbergErrol GinsbergChief Executive OfficerDate:      March 5, 2008
    /s/ Thomas B. MillerThomas B. MillerChief Financial Officer 79
◻
              REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    ⌧
              ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
      ◻
              TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    ◻
              SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  -----------------------------
  For the transition period from to
  000-30902
                        
 Title of each class
          Trading Symbol(s)
          Name of each exchange on which registeredOrdinary shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share
          CGEN
          The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
            (The Nasdaq Global Market) 
         67,922,836



        Ordinary Shares
    Yes  No
  If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
        reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  Yes  No
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
        for the past 90 days:
  Yes ☐ No
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be
        submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ( § 232.405 of this chapter)
        during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
  Yes ☐ No
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
        filer or an emerging growth company. See definition of “accelerated filer” “large accelerated filer”and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
  Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Emerging



          growth company☐
        U.S. GAAP ☒
          International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
          Other ☐by the International Accounting Standards Board ☐      Item 17 Item 18 ☐
   
 es ☒ No
  
 
 EXPLANATORY NOTE
          Exhibit Number
          Description2.1
          Description of Securities.  
     COMPUGEN LTD.By:
            /s/ Dr. Anat Cohen-DayagName: Dr. Anat Cohen-DayagTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer, DirectorDate: February 27, 2020