alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998             APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999             JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                             663                     663
<SECURITIES>                                    22,467                  22,467
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,096                  10,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                       407                     407
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,423                  33,423
<PP&E>                                           3,128                   3,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,272                   1,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,280                  42,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,523                  10,523
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,248                  29,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,280                  42,280
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,327                  19,181
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,014                   7,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,287                  20,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (311)                 (1,042)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    337                  (8,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50                      50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                287                  (8,487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       287                  (8,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02                    (.63)
        

</TABLE>
Order issued October 30, 2012

In The

(!nitrt uf n1at,

fiftI! Jitrirt uf ixu tt Jtllzu

No. 05-1 0-00690-CV

ARGO I)ATA RESO1JRCE CORPORATION AND MAX MARTIN, Appellants

V.

BALKRISHNA SHAGRITHAYA, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVAT!VELY IN THE

NAN’IE OF ARGO DATA RESOURCE CORPORATION, Appellee

ORDER

Before Justices Morris. Fillmore, and Myers

Appel1ees September 13. 2012 Motion ibr En Bane Rehearing is DENIED.

[CE
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5706 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5706

To designate the facility of the Government Printing Office located at 
  31451 East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, as the ``Frank Evans 
                 Government Printing Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2010

  Mr. Salazar (for himself, Mr. Perlmutter, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Polis of 
  Colorado, Ms. Markey of Colorado, Mr. Coffman of Colorado, and Mr. 
   Lamborn) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the facility of the Government Printing Office located at 
  31451 East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, as the ``Frank Evans 
                 Government Printing Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the Government Printing Office located at 31451 
East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Frank Evans Government Printing Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, record, or other 
paper of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Frank Evans Government 
Printing Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Feingold, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered October 8, 1985, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain tape recordings made pursuant to telephone wiretaps.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The indictment of the 24 defendants in this case resulted from an investigation of a narcotics operation. The defendant Harry Feingold was indicted on four counts, including conspiracy and the sale and possession of cocaine. That branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress tape recordings obtained as a result of court-ordered wiretaps was denied, and he subsequently pleaded guilty to the instant charges. Prior to accepting the defendant’s plea, the court inquired as to whether he was withdrawing all motions "already ruled upon by the Court or now before this Court with respect to this proceeding”. The defendant, represented by counsel, withdrew all motions "heretofore made”.

On appeal, the defendant raises various issues concerning the denial of his motion to suppress. We decline to reach those issues as we find that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to review of the denial of his omnibus motion by withdrawing all motions prior to acceptance of his plea *(see, People v Williams,*36 NY2d 829, *cert denied*423 US 873; *People v Colarusso,*103 AD2d 848; *People v Jandrew,*101 AD2d 90).

The imposition of consecutive sentences was permissible here because the offense of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree is not a material element of the offense of conspiracy *(see, People v Catone,*65 NY2d 1003). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1   BINGHAM CANYON CORPORATION   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  March  27, 2009   /s/ Brett D. Mayer Brett D. Mayer Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, I, Debra A. Schneider, Chief Financial
Officer of Transgenomic, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transgenomic, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Transgenomic, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DEBRA A. SCHNEIDERDebra A. SchneiderChief Financial Officer


Date: August 6, 2008

A signed original of the certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Transgenomic, Inc. and will be retained by Transgenomic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



27
# C_2021031EN.01004801.xml

| 28.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/48

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10010 — Investindustrial Group/CSM Ingredients)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 31/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Global Food Solutions S.àr.l. (Luxembourg), ultimately controlled by Investindustrial S.A. (‘Investindustrial’, Luxembourg); |
| --- | --- |

—

Global Food Solutions S.àr.l. (Luxembourg), ultimately controlled by Investindustrial S.A. (‘Investindustrial’, Luxembourg);

| — | CSM Ingredients (the United Kingdom), ultimately controlled by Rhône Capital L.L.C. (USA); |
| --- | --- |

—

CSM Ingredients (the United Kingdom), ultimately controlled by Rhône Capital L.L.C. (USA);

Global Food Solutions acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of part(s) of CSM Ingredients.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Investindustrial: investments in medium-sized companies based in Europe, including Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom, focusing on three main investment areas: consumer and leisure, healthcare and services, and industrial manufacturing; |
| --- | --- |

—

Investindustrial: investments in medium-sized companies based in Europe, including Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom, focusing on three main investment areas: consumer and leisure, healthcare and services, and industrial manufacturing;

| — | CSM Ingredients: manufacturing and distribution of semi-finished bakery, dairy and ice-cream ingredients, mainly to the artisanal traditional trade (pastry and bakery shops) and industrial channels; |
| --- | --- |

—

CSM Ingredients: manufacturing and distribution of semi-finished bakery, dairy and ice-cream ingredients, mainly to the artisanal traditional trade (pastry and bakery shops) and industrial channels;

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

Case M.10010 — Investindustrial Group/CSM Ingredients

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
**Exhibit 10.20****AMENDMENT NO. 1****TO****EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**This First Amendment (the “**Amendment**”), entered into this 23rd day of April 2007,is to the Employment Agreement (the “**Agreement**”) entered into the 31st day of December2006, by and between, Caneum India Private Limited (formerly known as Continuum Systems PrivateLimited), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and having its registered office at204, Chandi Plaza, 234-A, Sant Nagar, New Delhi — 110065, India with its principal place ofbusiness at DLF Supermart 1, Gurgaon, Haryana, (hereinafter referred to as the “**Caneum India**”,which expression shall, unless repugnant to the context, include its successors and permittedassigns) and Jesper Lindorff, son of Helge Holst Lindorff, age 35, residing at E-26 Richmond Park,DLF Phase 4, Gurgaon 122002, Haryana, India (herein after referred to as the “**Employee**”).RECITALS:WHEREAS, on or about December 31, 2006, the parties entered into the Agreement, the purpose ofwhich was to employee the Employee; andWHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein;NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to §15 of the Agreement, the parties hereto mutually agree to amendthe Agreement as follows:1. Amendment to Compensation. Paragraph (e) of §5 is hereby added to read as follows:(e) Stock Options. Caneum India shall grant to Employee ten-year options topurchase 150,000 shares of common stock of Caneum, Inc., a Nevada, USA, corporation(“**Caneum**”) pursuant to Caneum’s 2002 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the “Plan”), a copyof which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, subject to vesting at the rate of 1/4 ofthe granted options after one year from December 31, 2006, and 1/48th of the granted optionsper month thereafter**.**2. Remainder of Agreement. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue tobe, and shall remain, in full force and effect. Except as provided herein, this Amendment shallnot be deemed (i) to be a waiver of, or consent to, or a modification or amendment of, any otherterm or condition of the Agreement or (ii) to prejudice any right or rights which Caneum India maynow have or may have in the future under or in connection withthe Agreement or any of the instruments or agreements referred to therein, as the same may beamended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.
 
 

 
3. Incorporation by Reference. The terms of the Agreement are incorporated herein byreference and shall form a part of this Amendment as if set forth herein in their entirety.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment the respective dayand year set forth below to be effective as of the day and year first written above.     CANEUM INDIA:CANEUM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Exhibit 31





Certifications


SECTION 302




I, Jonathan Ricker, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and


cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;




4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;




b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and




c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;




5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.Date: July 29  , 2011
By:
/s/ Jonathan RickerJonathan RickerTitle: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5877 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5877

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 655 Centre Street in Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, as the ``Lance 
  Corporal Alexander Scott Arredondo, United States Marine Corps Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ALEXANDER SCOTT ARREDONDO, UNITED STATES 
              MARINE CORPS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 655 Centre Street in Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Alexander Scott Arredondo, 
United States Marine Corps Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Alexander Scott Arredondo, United States Marine Corps Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5877

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 655 Centre Street in Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, as the ``Lance 
  Corporal Alexander Scott Arredondo, United States Marine Corps Post 
                           Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K A for the year ending April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan Ricker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jonathan RickerJonathan Ricker

Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer





October 7, 2010
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 03-1452(E)

HELEN COLEMAN, APPELLANT,

 

 V.

R. JAMES NICHOLSON,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before HAGEL, MOORMAN, and DAVIS, Judges.

O R D E R

On July 9, 2007, the Veterans Law Group (movant) filed an unopposed motion for leave to

file a late brief as amicus curiae pursuant to Rule 29 of this Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure.

The movant argues that it became aware of the appeal last week, and it seeks to file a brief because

of this case's potential to affect many claimants.

However, Rule 29 provides that the amicus brief "must be filed within the time allowed the

party whose position the amicus curiae supports unless the Court permits later filing." See U.S.VET.

APP. R. 29(a). Here, the movant seeks to file an amicus brief nearly five months beyond the time

period denoted in the Court rules. Because of the late filing and the advanced stage of the Court's

adjudication of the case, the motion will be denied, and the Clerk will return the submitted brief to

the movant.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the unopposed motion for leave to file an amicus brief is DENIED. It is

further

ORDERED that the movant's brief is not accepted for filing. The Clerk of the Court is

directed to return the brief to counsel with this order.

DATED: July 16, 2007 PER CURIAM.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Santiago, Appellant.

Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered on March 4, 1985, unanimously affirmed. Motion by appellant for leave to file a *pro se*supplemental brief denied. No opinion. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.