alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 7-06

In Re: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN,

LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules) provides for referring cases

under those Rules to a standing panel if the Court decides to establish such a panel on a rotating or

permanent basis. The Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel) was created on

January 27, 2005, by Miscellaneous Order No. 01-05, to consider disciplinary cases coming before

the Court. Pursuant to a December 23, 2004, Resolution of the Board of Judges, on August 1 of each

succeeding year, the membership of the panel shall be redesignated so that "the senior judge of the

Standing Panel will be replaced by the judge who is immediately junior to the junior judge then on

the Standing Panel." 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective immediately, the Standing Panel will consist of Judges Kasold,

Hagel, and Moorman.

DATED: September 7, 2006 BY THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned  officer  of  Novadel  Pharma  Inc.  a  Delaware   corporation  (the
"Company"),  does hereby  certify,  to the best of such officer's  knowledge and
belief, that:

      (1) The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period ended
April 30,  2004 (the "Form  10-QSB")  of the  Company  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

      (2) The information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 14, 2004                /s/ Gary A. Shangold, M.D.
                                    --------------------------
                                    Gary A. Shangold, M.D.
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer


      This certification  shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the  Securities  Exchange Act, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  Such  certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
**Exhibit16**

**(Grant Thornton Letterhead)**

January18, 2007

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Office of the Chief Accountant

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549
|        | Re:    | SPACEHAB, Incorporated |
|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   | File No. 0-27206)      |

 

Dear Sir or Madam:

We have read Item 4.01 ofForm 8-K of SPACEHAB, Incorporated datedJanuary 18, 2007, and agree with the statements concerning our Firm containedtherein.

Very truly yours,

 

----
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000156

10-OCT-2016

08:15 AM
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 7-00

In Re: Panel Referrals in Pro Se Cases

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and FARLEY, HOLDAWAY,

IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

Misc. Order No. 3-99, In Re Panel Referrals in Pro Se Cases, 12 Vet.App. 316 (1999) (en

banc), is hereby revoked. Procedures contained in that order are superceded by the Court's Internal

Operating Procedures, at II(f).

DATED: December 26, 2000 BY THE COURT:

KENNETH B. KRAMER

Chief Judge
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00321-CV

In re Wendy Diane Dutra

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Filed: June 12, 2015
Listen

# Correspondence

Commission Sends Letter to White House Addressing Anti-Asian Racism and Xenophobia in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context
May 11, 2021

Testimony of Chair Catherine E. Lhamon before the House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties
September 24, 2020

Commission Sends Letter to USCIS about Backlog of Naturalization Applications
September 11, 2020

Commission sends Letter to House Committees about a Reallocation of Resources
August 6, 2020

Commission Sends Letter to U.S. Senators about Nondiscrimination in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context
May 8, 2020

Commission Sends Letters to Connecticut Attorney General & Legislators Transmitting Advisory Committee Memorandum on Prosecutorial Practices
October 8, 2019

Letter from the Commission to the Federal Housing Finance Agency Regarding Revised Uniform Residential Loan Application (URLA)
September 13, 2019

Commission Sends Letters to Tennessee Officials and Legislators Transmitting Advisory Committee Report on Civil Asset Forfeiture
August 22, 2019

Commission Sends Letter to New Hampshire Secretary of State Transmitting Advisory Committee Report on Voting Rights
August 19, 2019

Commission Sends Letters to Government Entities Transmitting Texas Advisory Committee Memorandum on Voting Rights
April 25, 2019

-  1 
-  2 
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  All News 
-  Commission News 
-  Advisory Committees News 
-  Correspondence 
-  Videos 
-  Archives
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-943]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-36,568]

The Boeing Company, Long Beach, California; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By letter of November 18, 1999, the UAW requested administrative 
reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative 
Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance, applicable to petition number TA-W-36,568. The denial 
notice was signed on October 20, 1999 and published in the Federal 
Register on November 4, 1999 (64 FR 60230).
    The Department has determined that the petition investigation 
warrants further examination of customer purchasing patterns of 
commercial aircraft.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 6th day of January 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-943 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Central, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Terrence J. Leifheit President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Terrence J. Leifheit
-----------------------------
Terrence J. Leifheit
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 11, 2003
#### Earl FORSYTHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CITYWIDE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.*

No. 10-3230-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 23, 2011.

Earl Forsythe, New York, NY, pro se.

Julie Steiner, Senior Counsel, Appeals Division, New York City Law Department, New York, NY, for Appellee.

Present: CHESTER J. STRAUB, REENA RAGGI, RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption to read as shown above.

SUMMARY ORDER

*Pro se*plaintiff Earl Forsythe appeals from an award of summary judgment in favor of defendant New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services (“DCAS”) on his Title VII claim of employment discrimination. *See*42 U.S.C. § 2000e *et seq.*We review an award of summary judgment *de novo,*applying the three-step analysis established by *McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), and “resolving all ambiguities and drawing all permissible factual inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought.” *Burg v. Gosselin,*591 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). We will uphold such an award only if the record reveals no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). In applying these standards, we assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case.

On an independent review of the record, we conclude that summary judgment was correctly entered in favor of defendant for *41the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion. We note only that Forsythe’s failure to adduce any evidence to support his conclusory allegation that a “ban-list” existed precluding African-Americans from working at certain DCAS sites reinforces the conclusion that his claim fails at the first step of *McDonnell Douglas*analysis. *See Graham v. Long Island R.R.,*230 F.3d 34, 38 (2d Cir.2000).

We have considered Forsythe’s remaining arguments on appeal and conclude that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of 30DC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period  ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Edward Dale, Principal Executive
Officer,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chairman of the Board of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 3, 2013

/s/ Edward Dale
-----------------------------------------------------
Edward Dale,
Principal Executive Officer, President and Chief Executive Officer

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MIse. No. 09-09 

IN RE: COURT CLOSED ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009; TIiURSDA Y, DECEMBER 24, 2009; AND 

TIiURSDA Y, DECEMBER 31, 2009 

ORDE R 

By order of the ChicfJudge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be 

closed on Friday, November 27, 2009; Thursday, December 24, 2009; and Thursday, December 31, 

2009. 

For purposes of computation oftime and motions (0 enlarge time under the Court's Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, Friday, November 27, 2009; Thursday. December 24, 2009; and Thursday, 

December 31,2009, will be considered days when the Clerk's Office has been closed. See U.S. VET. 

App. R. 26(a)(I). 

DATED: October 16, 2009 FOR THE COURT: 

~l~~ Clerk of the Court
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1657

_____________________________

CARL S. MILLS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

June 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Carl S. Mills, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      51,057,000
<SECURITIES>                                69,245,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,369,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            147,563,00
<PP&E>                                      22,316,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             181,661,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       77,514,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               181,661,000
<SALES>                                    102,396,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           102,396,000
<CGS>                                       37,069,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,069,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,204,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,471,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,733,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,733,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     224,344,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,728,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                   329,265
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           226,800,826
<PP&E>                                      35,938,603
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,689,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             448,109,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,666,451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,315
<OTHER-SE>                                 440,164,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               448,109,242
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,530,680
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,354,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,663,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,429,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,429,980)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,429,980)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.41)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 10-16

IN RE: COURT CLOSURE ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2016.

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be

closed on Friday, November 25, 2016.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and

Procedure, Friday, November 25, 2016, will be considered a day when the Court is closed. See U.S.

VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: October 20, 2016 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF A.M.J.

PETITION OF: D.A.J., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 293 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### The State *against*The Township Committees of the Townships of Chester and Evesham, in the County of Burlington.

MANDAMUS.

One and the same writ of *mandamus*cannot be directed to the township, committees of two several townships, to compel them to proceed,to do their duty in a matter of road.

*347This was a writ of *mandamus*directed to the township committees of the townships of Chester and Evesham, in the county of Burlington, reciting, “That whereas J. TI. and others, (naming them) surveyors of the highways of the county of Burlington, on the second day of March, A. *D.*1825, laid out a certain road of three rods wide in the said townships of Chester and Evesham; nevertheless that the said township committees had refused and neglected to assign and appoint, in writing, to some one or more of the overseers of the highways in the said townships the road aforesaid thus laid out, for opening, clearing out, working, amendment and repair agreeably to the provision of the statute in such case made and'provided, therefore commanding and strictly enjoining the said township committees, immediately upon the receipt of the said writ, to assign and appoint, in writing, to some one or more of the overseers of the highways of the said townships, their several limits and divisions of the said road for opening, clearing out, making, amendment and repair, or shew cause to the 'contrary.”

*Sloan,*for the defendants,

moved to quash this writ, and contended, that the same writ could not be directed to the township committees of two several townships. But that there should be a separate writ to each township.

*Hamilton,*contra.

By the Court.

The duties and liabilities of the townships and their officers in the opening, making and repair of roads are entirely distinct. Each township acts for itself and not in connection with any other. *Rev. Laws*621. *Chitty*says, where an highway running through several parishes is out of repair, a joint indictment is not sustainable. 3 *Chit. Cr. Law,*567. The committees of both townships ought not, in the present case, to have been included in the same writ.

Let the *mandamus*be quashed.
# Green Card Through the Indochinese Parole Adjustment Act

On Nov. 1, 2000, Congress passed a law that allows certain individuals from Vietnam, Kampuchea (Cambodia), and Laos to adjust their status to permanent resident and get their Green Card (Public Law 106-429).

You may be eligible to get a Green Card (permanent residence) under the Indochinese Parole Adjustment Act if you meet all of the following conditions:
                    - You are a native or citizen of Vietnam, Kampuchea (Cambodia), or Laos
                    - You were inspected and paroled into the United States before Oct. 1, 1997
                    - You were paroled into the United States from Vietnam under the auspices of the Orderly Departure Program (ODP), a refugee camp in East Asia, or a displaced person camp administered by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Thailand
                    - You were physically present in the United States prior to and on Oct. 1, 1997
                    - You are admissible to the United States

To obtain a Green Card under the Indochinese Parole Adjustment Act, you must file Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.

The following evidence should be submitted with Form I-485:
                    - Two passport-style photos
                    - Copy of government issued photo identification
                    - Copy of birth certificate
                    - Copy of passport page with nonimmigrant visa (if applicable)
                    - Copy of passport page with admission (entry) or parole stamp (if applicable)
                    - Form I-94, Arrival/ Departure Record (if applicable)
                    - Form I-693, Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record
                    - Applicable fees
                    - Certified copies of court records (if you have ever been arrested)
                    - Evidence of Vietnamese, Kampuchean, or Laotian citizenship or nationality
                    - Evidence of physical presence in the United States prior to and on Oct. 1, 1997

Generally, when you have a pending Form I-485, it is possible for you to apply for authorization to work in the United States and to seek advance parole (advance permission to travel and be admitted to the United States upon your return). For further information, see our Work Authorization and Travel Documents pages.

01/27/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.