alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 14-21

IN RE COURT CLOSURE ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2021, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2021, AND

MONDAY,JANUARY 3, 2022.

O R D E R

By direction of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

will be closed on Friday, November 26, 2021, Thursday, December 23, 2021, and Monday, 

January 3, 2022.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, Friday, November 26, 2021, Thursday, December 23, 2021, and Monday, January 3, 

2022, will be considered days when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: October 14, 2021 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Amended

(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Donald B. Cohen, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Quantum Group, Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.





Date:  February 13, 2007



/s/Donald B. Cohen

Donald B. Cohen

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Unassociated Document


    

      AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO

      EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      


      THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of March 26,
2010 between Energy and Power Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and Iyad Darcazallie (“Executive”).

      


      RECITALS

      


      WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive previously entered into that certain Executive
Employment Agreement dated as of April 17, 2009 (the “Agreement”).

      


      WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive desire to amend and modify certain provisions of the
Agreement as provided herein, effective as of the date hereof.

      


      AGREEMENT

      


      NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable
consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

      


      1.      
      Position and
Duties.  The first sentence of Section 3 of the Agreement is
hereby amended and restated as follows:

       

      “EPS will
continue to employ Executive as Chief Operating Officer for EPS.”

       

      2.
           Ratification and
Incorporation of Executive Employment Agreement.  Except as
expressly amended hereby, all the terms, conditions and provisions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall
form a part of the Agreement for all purposes.

       

      


       

      [Signature
Page Follows]

       


      
        
           


        

        
           


          
            

          

        

        
           


        

      


      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on and as of
the day and year first written above.

      


      


      COMPANY:

      


      ENERGY
AND POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.

      


      


      By:  /s/ Jay Zoellner        
Name:  Jay
Zoellner
Title:  President
and CEO

      


      


      EXECUTIVE:

      


      


      /s/ Iyad Darcazallie        

      Name:  Iyad
Darcazallie

      


      


      



      
        
           


        

        
          -2-
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00514-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.E.S. and R.K.S., CHILDREN

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CI-04448

Honorable Gloria Saldaña, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee Robert Scott Story recover his costs of this appeal 

from appellant Kirsten Quimby.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_____________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph P. Ciavarella,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February 6,
      2009
              By:
              /s/
      Joseph P. CiavarellaJoseph
      P. Ciavarella
                Chief
      Financial Officer
**Exhibit 12.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Ira Palti, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Ceragon Networks Ltd.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in the Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered bythe annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 

 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: October 26, 2007**CERAGON NETWORKS LTD.**
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
      Inc.
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sanding Tao, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 28, 2008





/S/
      Sanding Tao





Sanding
      Tao


Chief
      Financial Officer
#### Spalding *v.*Dickinson.

Error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.

No. 82,

argued with No. 81, *ante,*483.

*Mr. W. Willoughby*for plaintiff in error'.

*Mr. Attorney General*and *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Dickinson*for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Harlan:

The defendant in error succeeded Mr. Vilas in the office of Postmaster General. The declaration in the present case is, in all material respects, like that in *Spalding*v. *Vilas,*just decided. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in- that case the judgment is

*Affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9882]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Government in the Sunshine Meeting; Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date:  11:00 a.m., Monday, April 24, 2000.

Place:  Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to be Considered:   

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information:  Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information:  You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: April 14, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-9882 Filed 4-14-00; 5:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 4.5

SCHEDULE OF FIXED RATE INTERNOTES
ISSUED

|          |  |          |       |   |           |  |           |       |  |  |          |  |  |           |          |  |             |   |           |  |  |  |              | 
|--------- |  | -------- | ----- | - | --------- |  | --------- | ----- |  |  | -------- |  |  | --------- | -------- |  | ----------- | - | --------- |  |  |  | ------------ | 
|          |  | Interest |       |   | Interest  |  |           |       |  |  |          |  |  |          
|          |  | Coupon   |       |   | Coupon    |  |           | Issue |  |  | Maturity |  |  | Principal |          |  | Redemption  |  
|CUSIP No. |  | Rate     |       |   | Frequency |  |           | Date  |  |  | Date     |  |  | Amount    |          |  | Information |  
|          |  |          |       |   |           |  |           |       |  |  |          |  |  |           |          |  |             |  
|26876EAA3 |  |          | 4.750 | % |           |  | Monthly   |       |  |  | 06/24/04 |  |  |           | 06/15/08 |  |             | $ | 3,190,000 |  |  |  | Non-callable | 
|26876EAB1 |  |          | 5.250 | % |           |  | Quarterly |       |  |  | 06/24/04 |  |  |           | 06/15/10 |  |             | $ | 1,152,000 |  |  |  | Non-callable |
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of ViryaNet Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the Company):



| | 1) | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-65904), pertaining to the 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plans of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | Registration Statement on Forms F-3/A (File Number 333-114504) of the Company,
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3) | Registration Statement on Form F-3/A (File Number 333-130632) of the Company and,
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4) | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-146265), pertaining to the 2005 Israeli Share Option And Restricted Share Plan and 2005 International Share Option
And Restricted Share Plan of the Company:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated September 23, 2008, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|              |  |  |  |                                    
|------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|              |  | 
|Haifa, Israel |  |  |  | /s/ KOST, FORER GABBAY and KASIERER
|July 15, 2010 |  |  |  | A Member of Ernst & Young Global
#### Clinton LeMay et al., Respondents, v H. W. Keeney, Inc., Defendant, and Mobil Corporation et al., Appellants.

*1027Special Term should have granted Mobil’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint as barred by the release. Where, as here, the language of a release is clear, effect will be given to the intention of the parties as indicated by the language employed and the fact that one of the parties may have intended something else is irrelevant *(Matter of Schaefer,*18 NY2d 314, 317; *Single v Whitmore,*307 NY 575; 19 NY Jur 2d, Compromise, Accord and Release, § 77, at 425-426). Since at the time he executed the release plaintiff was aware of the injuries for which he now seeks compensation and failed to exclude his personal injury claim from the embrace of the release, the release bars the instant lawsuit and the complaint must be dismissed, whether New York or New Jersey law is applied *(see, Mangini v McClurg,*24 NY2d 556; *Viskovich v Walsh-Fuller-Slattery,*16 AD2d 67, *affd*13 NY2d 1100; *Bilotti v Accurate Forming Corp.,*39 NJ 184, 204, 184 A2d 24, 35). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Wagner, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.
(85 South. 265)

#### Ex parte ACHA HERMANOS Y CIA.

(1 Div. 140.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 22, 1920.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1920.)

Certiorari <&wkey; 15 — Findings of fact of Court of Appeals not review,able on certiorari.

Writ of certiorari will not bo issued to review a decision of the Court of Appeals, where the question sought to be reviewed requires a review of its findings of fact.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Ex parte application by Acha Hermanos y Cia for writ of certiorari to the court of appeals to review a decision affirming a judgment. in favor of one Rosengrant against petitioner (84 South. 399). Writ denied.

Rich & Hamilton, of Mobile, for appellant.

Palmer Pillans and Alec T. Gresham, both of Mobile, for appellee.

BROWN, J.

The question sought to be reviewed by the petition here requires a review of the finding of facts by the Court of Appeals (84 South. 399) which, under the uniform holdings of this court, will not be done. Postal Telegraph Co. v. Minderhout. 195 Ala. 420, 71 South. 91.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.
#### Gommersall *v.*Crew *et al.*

*(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.*

June 2, 1890.)

Evidence—Declarations and Admissions—Offer of Compromise.

An offer of compromise made is inadmissible in evidence against the party making it.

Appeal from second district court.

*232Action by William H. Gommersall against Henry Crew and others to recover his commissions as broker.

Argued before Larremore, 0. J., and Allen and Bookstaver, JJ.

*W. P. Taylor,*for appellant. *Mr. McCarthy,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The evidence in this case, as to the employment of the plaintiff as a broker by the defendants, is very conflicting, while the plaintiff admits that he was employed by the party of whom the property was procured, as a broker, although he claims that the defendants knew of such employment, which they deny. The judgment being on conflicting evidence, and especially as there is a doubt as to whether or not the defendants knew of plaintiff’s employment by the other party to the transaction, the judgment was properly rendered in favor of the defendants. It is contended on the part of the appellant that the testimony of Mr. Toler, a witness for the plaintiff, was improperly stricken out. He was the attorney for the plaintiff, and Mr. Crew, one of the defendants, had an interview with him. From Mr. Toler’s testimony, it does not appear whether or not what was then said by Mr. Crew related to an effort to compromise the matter. But that it had relation to such an effort is distinctly testified to by Mr. Crew, who said that he made plaintiff’s attorney an offer, to save trouble. A party has a right to purchase his peace, and to make an offer of compromise for that purpose, but such offers are not evidence. We think the evidence, in the light of Mr. Crew’s testimony, was properly stricken out. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.
# Feedback Updates

Whether we asked the question or you asked us, this page is your source for USCIS feedback responses. On this page, you will find:
                - List of memorandum, review periods and results
                - Link to the final policy memorandum

See Immigration Policy and Procedural Memoranda for all published memos

----

## Previous Feedback Opportunities

09/05/2018

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 Statement of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands) For the three months ended March
        31,2005Income before income
          taxes, allocation to minority interests and income from investments
          in unconsolidated joint ventures
      
      $
      104,220Plus Fixed Charges:Interest expense
      
      
      212,772Capitalized interest
      
      
      Loan amortization cost
      
      
      2,800Fixed charges
      
      
      215,572Plus amortization of
          capitalized interest
      
      
      637Plus distributed income
          of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
      
      
      6,104Less capitalized interest
      
      
      Less minority interest
          in pretax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges
      
      
      (965
      )Total
      
      
      5,776Earnings
      
      $
      325,568Fixed charges
      
      $
      215,572Earnings to fixed charges
      
      
      1.5
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1849

STARSHA M. SEWELL, A Natural Person and Resident of Maryland On Behalf of Herself and Her African American Son ’ s , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, A Natural Person, acting as a Federal Judge In the United States of America , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv
- 03256

- JKB )

Submitted : November 27, 2017 Decided: December 6, 2017

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order returning various documents to
Sewell be cause the case was closed . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Chasanow , No. 1:16

- cv
- 03256

- JKB (D. Md. July 6, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED