alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6014 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

212 Main Street in Hartman, Arkansas, as the ‘‘M.R. ‘Bucky’ Walters 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2010 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. BERRY, Mr. ROSS, and Mr. SNYDER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 212 Main Street in Hartman, Arkansas, as 

the ‘‘M.R. ‘Bucky’ Walters Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. M.R. ‘‘BUCKY’’ WALTERS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 212 Main Street in Hartman, 

6 Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘M.R. 

7 ‘Bucky’ Walters Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6014 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘M.R. ‘Bucky’ Walters 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LOGILITY AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          23,440
<SECURITIES>                                     9,724
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                       421
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,838
<PP&E>                                           2,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                     655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,458
<SALES>                                         14,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,200
<CGS>                                            3,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,656
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40527

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALEJANDRO SALAS-RANGEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-00-CR-1231-1

--------------------

February 1, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro

Salas-Rangel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Although Salas was notified of his right to respond to his

counsel’s motion, Salas has not filed a response. 

Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
#### Howard J. Stirling, Appellant, v 107 Oakland Place, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The court properly dismissed the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 for failure to state a cause of action. With respect to the sixth cause of action asserting a violation of Real Property Law § 235-f, plaintiff has failed to allege damages. Although he does allege that he expended attorney’s fees in opposing the eviction notice and bringing this action, under the general rule, absent an express contractual allegation or specific statutory authority, such expenses are not recoverable as an item of damages *(see, Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak,*69 NY2d 1, 5; *Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co.,*47 NY2d 12, 21-22; *Dunkel v McDonald,*272 App Div 267, 272, *affd*298 NY 586; *Clason v Nassau Ferry Co.,*20 Misc 315, *affd*27 App Div 621). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ricotta, J.—dismiss complaint.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RUSSELL CEJAS, a/k/a RUSSELL H. ) CEJAS, DOC #R54227, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1631 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 17, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge. Russell Cejas, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SHARON LEE a/k/a SHARON BYRD,

DOC #577342, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4014

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 14, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Joseph A. Bulone, Judge.

Sharon Lee a/k/a Sharon Byrd, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 31.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
                 (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Noel J. Guillama , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Quantum Group, Inc.
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date:   February 11, 2005

/s/ NOEL J. GUILLAMA
--------------------
NOEL J. GUILLAMA
President and Chief Executive Officer
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 2000-1
$ 349,390,000.00 Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001




           PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
              DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %

          ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-2001   7,924,372   1,790,675     828,939    3.44%    8,583,983    2.97%
 Feb-2001   8,774,278   1,737,744     339,901    1.45%   10,489,845    3.73%
 Mar-2001   9,150,273   1,686,320     256,195    1.13%    8,238,740    3.03%
 Apr-2001   9,798,476   1,633,216     247,290    1.13%    8,785,049    3.35%
 May-2001   9,129,055   1,574,017     419,259    1.99%    7,350,453    2.91%
 Jun-2001   9,322,284   1,518,862     428,507    2.11%    7,894,023    3.25%
 Jul-2001   9,073,660   1,462,540     406,745    2.09%    7,530,147    3.22%
 Aug-2001   9,765,576   1,407,720     316,300    1.70%    7,932,488    3.55%
 Sep-2001   8,971,809   1,348,720     540,046    3.03%    7,119,751    3.32%
 Oct-2001   7,229,411   1,294,515     298,578    1.73%    7,349,040    3.56%
 Nov-2001   9,553,550   1,250,837     449,506    2.74%    7,235,301    3.68%
 Dec-2001   8,225,851   1,192,083     429,539    2.74%    6,989,439    3.71%

          ____________ ___________ ___________
  Totals  106,918,595  17,897,251   4,960,807

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual report of Global Realty Development
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB as amended for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Kohn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  March 28, 2008                 By: /s/ Robert Kohn
                                          ----------------------
                                          Robert Kohn
                                          Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

    <S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                       27,552
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                74,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            101,669
<PP&E>                                                          954
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              712,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       123,259
<BONDS>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                         58
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  403,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               $712,495
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  0
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            (22,948)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           (1,250)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (24,372)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (24,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (24,372)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 $(.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 $(.00)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**StratusServices Group, Inc.Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Stratus Services Group, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Joseph J. Raymond, Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  February 17, 2004 | By:    | /s/  Joseph J. Raymond                 |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   | Joseph  J. Raymond                     |
|                                |   | Chairman  of the Board of Directors,   |
|                                |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 15.1



                 LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION




May 14, 2003





Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc.
1000 Kiewit Plaza
Omaha, Nebraska 68131

Re:  Registration Statement No. 333-90418

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 14, 2003 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report
is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by
an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.





                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5992 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5992

   To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to eliminate the 
 authority of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
  to deny or restrict the use of a defined area as a dredged or fill 
            material disposal site, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Chaffetz, and 
  Mr. Jones) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to eliminate the 
 authority of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
  to deny or restrict the use of a defined area as a dredged or fill 
            material disposal site, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITS FOR DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 404(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344(c)) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply to a specification 
of a disposal site made under section 404 of the Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Glenn A. NORMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2011-7038.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 25, 2011.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

ORDER

RADER, Chief Judge.

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition to vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and to remand for further proceedings.

The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in his case. That court dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that the 120-day appeal period established by 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable * tolling. The appellant sought this court’s review.

This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal pending the United States Supreme Court’s review of our decision in *Henderson v. Shinseki,*589 F.3d 1201 (Fed.Cir.2009) (en banc) (affirming Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims determination that period to appeal to that court is not subject to equitable tolling). In *Henderson ex rel. Henderson v. Shinseki,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1197, 179 L.Ed.2d 159 (2011), the Supreme Court reversed this court’s decision and concluded that the 120-day deadline for filing an appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims does not have jurisdictional consequences. Because the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims erred in concluding that the appeal deadline established by § 7266(a) is jurisdictional, we vacate the Court of Appeals *950for Veterans Claims’ judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
Motion for an Extension of Time – Template (April 2023)

Per Rule 26(a)(1), the last day of the period is included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or day the Court is 

closed at the direction of the Chief Judge. 

Per Rule 26(b), any motion to extend the time set by these Rules or by an order or notice of the Court beyond a total of 45 days 

for a particular filing will be granted only for extraordinary circumstances. 

Per Rule 26(b)(3), a motion to extend time does not extend the date on which a pleading or other document is due to be filed 

with the Court unless the Court grants that motion. See Rule 5(b) (Effect of Stay). 

Per Rule 26(d), a motion for leave to file an out-of-time motion to extend time may be filed with a motion to extend time. 

IN THE UNITEDSTATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

JAMIE DOE, )

)

Appellant, ) 

)

v. ) No. XX-XXX 

) 

)

DENIS MCDONOUGH, )

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, )

)

Appellee, )

[APPELLANT’S] [APPELLEE’S] UNOPPOSED MOTION

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE [PLEADING]

1. [Appellant] [Appellee] submits this unopposed motion pursuant to Rule 26.

2. [Appellant] [Appellee] requests a X-day extension of time in which to file [pleading] [state 

with particularity the specific grounds on which the motion is based].

3. The date to be extended is Month Day, Year and the revised date sought is Month Day, Year.

4. The total number of days of extension previously granted to the Appellant in this case thus 

far is X days.

5. The total number of days of extension previously granted to the Appellee in this case thus far 

is X days.

6. [Appellant] [Appellee] is unopposed to this motion.

Date: January 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ A. Attorney

A. Attorney

Address and Phone Number

Counsel for [Appellant] [Appellee]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 09-22

IN RE COURT CLOSURE ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2022, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2022, AND

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 30, 2022.

O R D E R

By direction of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

will be closed on Friday, November 25, 2022, Friday, December 23, 2022, and Friday, December

30, 2022.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, Friday, November 25, 2022, Friday, December 23, 2022, and Friday, December 30, 

2022, will be considered days when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: October 3, 2022 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court