alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Caixia                  Peng                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
| Caixia                          PengChief                          Financial Officer Dated:                          January 19, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32(a)

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffry N. Quinn, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of
my knowledge:

        (1)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results
                of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 1, 2006

                                            /s/ Jeffry N. Quinn
                                            -------------------
                                            Jeffry N. Quinn
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chairman of the Board

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc.
and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinnacle
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Glen R. Gamble, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/Glen R. Gamble
-----------------------------
Glen R. Gamble
Chief Executive Officer

November 18, 2002





        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinnacle
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert A. Hildebrand,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/Robert A. Hildebrand
-----------------------------
Robert A. Hildebrand
Chief Financial Officer

November 18, 2002
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Alberto DiBella, certify that:

         I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Enviro Voraxial
Technology, Inc.;

         1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         3. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
         which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
         and
<PAGE>
                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 19, 2006

/s/ Alberto DiBella
-------------------
Alberto DiBella
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of WealthCraft Systems Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2009                          By: /s/ Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 31, 2009                           By: /s/ Xiao Zhen Li
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Xiao Zhen Li
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 10KSB of our report
dated March 19, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Gavella Corp. and Subsidiary (now known as DCI USA, Inc.) for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, which appears as Exhibit _______ in DCI USA, Inc.'s
Report on Form 10KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004. We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such
Annual Report.

                                                Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c.
                                                Maple Shade, New Jersey
                                                April 15, 2005
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 22-11

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGE

O R D E R

WHEREAS, pursuant to Misc. No. 14-11, Senior Judge John J. Farley, III, was recalled,

effective September 6, 2011, to perform substantial service to the Court for a period not to exceed

90 days unless extended by the Chief Judge with the consent of Judge Farley, and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Misc. No. 15-11, Senior Judge Donald L. Ivers was recalled,

effective September 12, 2011, to perform substantial service to the Court for a period not to exceed

90 days unless extended by the Chief Judge with the consent of Judge Ivers, and

WHEREAS the Chief Judge has determined that, if extended, Judges Farley and Ivers would

provide additional substantial service to the Court, and

WHEREAS Judges Farley and Ivers have agreed to an extension of their service to complete

matters they were working on during the above cited period of recall service,

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that, effective December 12, 2011, nunc pro tunc, Judges Farley and Ivers are

recalled to complete matters they were working on during the above cited period of recall service. 

Each day of service shall be recorded and maintained by the Clerk of the Court.

DATED: December 20, 2011 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1


                         DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES, LLC
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                          Years Ended
                                                                      -----------------------------------------------------
                                                                        1998       1999       2000       2001      2002
                                                                        Predecessor Company Historical
                                                                      --------------------------------

Earnings:
<S>                                                                    <C>         <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>
 Pretax income from continuing operations before equity earnings        (6,528)    51,856    341,800     337,032    (74,738)
 Add:
  Fixed charges                                                         54,791     55,021    151,567     168,789    172,341
  Distributed income of equity investees                                11,845     22,502     27,424      30,069     53,878

 Subtract:
  Interest Capitalized                                                   1,565        930        324         769      4,702

                                                                      --------   --------   --------    --------   --------
 Income as adjusted                                                     58,543    128,449    520,467     535,121    146,779
                                                                      --------   --------   --------    --------   --------

Fixed charges:
  Interest and Debt expense per Statement of Income                     52,403     52,915    149,220     165,670    165,841
  Capitalized Interest                                                   1,565        930        324         769      4,702
  Portion of rents representative of the interest factor                   823      1,176      2,023       2,350      1,798

                                                                      --------   --------   --------    --------   --------
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                     54,791     55,021    151,567     168,789    172,341
                                                                      --------   --------   --------    --------   --------


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                        1.07       2.33       3.43        3.17       0.85


Amount Needed to cover fixed charges:                                                                                25,562
</Table>
#### Frew Run Gravel Products, Inc., Respondent, v Town of Carroll et al., Appellants.

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The Town of Carroll Zoning Enforcement Officer notified petitioner that its gravel and sand operation was being conducted in violation of the Town Zoning Law. The property is situated in an AR-II zoning district where gravel and sand operations are not permitted as a matter of right or by special permit.

After obtaining a mining permit from the State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), petitioner commenced this proceeding for a permanent injunction restraining the town from enforcing its Zoning Law so as to bar extractive mining operations pursuant to the DEC permit. We disagree with the court’s finding that the Town Zoning Law was superseded by ECL 23-2703 (2), which provides: "For the *929purposes stated herein, this title shall supersede all other state and local laws relating to the extractive mining industry; provided, however, that nothing in this title shall be construed to prevent any local government from enacting local zoning ordinances or other local laws which impose stricter mined land reclamation standards or requirements than those found herein.”

If a local government is otherwise authorized to legislate, it is not prohibited from doing so unless the State, expressly or impliedly, has evinced "an unmistakable desire” to avoid the possibility that the local law will be inconsistent with State law *(People v New York Trap Rock Corp.,*57 NY2d 371, 378; *Monroe-Livingston Sanitary Landfill v Town of Caledonia,*51 NY2d 679, 683). The Town Zoning Law is not a law "relating to the extractive mining industry”. To the extent the local law bars gravel and sand operations from an AR-II zone, it does not purport to regulate an industry. It simply seeks to regulate land use generally. The Environmental Conservation Law was not designed to regulate the use to be made of land within a town’s zoning district. Thus, there is no possibility that the zoning provision at issue here could conflict with State law. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Adams, J. — permanent injunction.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

- DIVISION ONE

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR )

AND INDUSTRIES OF THE STATE OF)

WASHINGTON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

)

)

)

Respondent. )

RONALD V. MA'AE,

No. 78030-1-1

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: April 1, 2019

SCHINDLER, J. — The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) appeals

the superior court order affirming the decision and order of the Board of Industrial

Insurance Appeals (BlIA).1 The BHA reversed the decision of the Department to deny

the application of Ronald V. Ma'ae to reopen his industrial injury claim because he did

not submit medical documentation from a Department network provider as required

under the 2012 amendment to WAC 296-14-400. WASH. Si. REG. 12-06-066 (effective

January 1, 2013). The BHA concluded the statute establishing a health care provider

network, RCW 51.36.010, and the statute that allows a worker to reopen a claim for

aggravation, RCW 51.32.160, do not limit a worker from filing an application to reopen

1 The facts are fully set forth in Ma'ae v. Department of Labor & Industries, No. 77737-8-1 (Wash.

Ct. App. Apr. 1, 2019), http://www.courts.wa.gov/ opinions/.
No. 78030-1-1/2

with medical documentation only from a Department network provider. The BHA

remanded to the Department to consider the medical documentation submitted by a

doctor who is not a member of the provider network.

In Ma'ae, No. 77737-8-1, we held promulgating the amendment to WAC 296-14-

400 exceeded the authority of the Department and is invalid. Accordingly, we affirm the

superior court order. Upon compliance with RAP 18.1, Ma'ae is entitled to an award of

attorney fees and costs under RCW 51.52.130.

WE CONCUR:

y

2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  the Chief Financial  Officer of DCI USA, Inc. (the "Company")
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that, to his  knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
for the year ended  December 31, 2004 fully  complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and  information
contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 15, 2005

/s/ Michael Gibbs
-----------------------
Michael Gibbs
Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY


                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of American  Skiing  Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 26, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Helen
E. Wallace,  Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  March 10, 2004

                                      By: /s/ Helen E. Wallace
                                      ------------------------
                                      Helen E. Wallace
                                      Senior Vice President, Chief
                                      Financial Officer
                                      (Principal Financial Officer)






     This certification  accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act").  Such  certification  will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act,  except to the extent  that the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.
(78 Hun, 426.)

#### BLACK et al. v. McALEENAN et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Eirst Department.

May 18, 1894.)

Pleading—Bill oe Particulars.

In an action to recover a diamond necklace, alleged to have been delivered by plaintiff to one E. for the purpose of showing it to a proposed purchaser, and pawned by E. to defendants, the name, address, business, and financial standing of the proposed purchaser are not particulars which plaintiff will be required to disclose by a bill of particulars.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by Robert 0. Black and others against Henry McAleenan and others, to recover a diamond necklace, or its value, alleged to have been delivered by plaintiffs to one Eustace, in order that said Eustace might show it to a proposed customer, and pawned by Eustace to defendants. Plaintiffs’ motion for a further bill of particulars giving the name, address, business, and financial standing of the proposed customer was granted, and plaintiffs appeal.

Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT and PARKER, JJ.

Joseph Fettretch, for appellants.

George C. Comstock, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The name, address, business, and financial •standing of the proposed customer are not particulars of the plain*149tiffs’ cause of action, but are merely evidentiary facts, which the plaintiffs should not be required to disclose by a bill of particulars. The plaintiffs’ right of recovery would not be defeated or affected by the fact that Eustis gave the name of some person as a proposed customer who had not in fact proposed to purchase the necklace. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. ■