alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Patrick G. Blanchard, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and James M. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer,
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By:


         /s/ Patrick G. Blanchard
         -----------------------------------------
         Patrick G. Blanchard
         President and Chief Executive Officer
         November 13, 2002


         /s/ James M. Thomas
         -----------------------------------------
         James M. Thomas
         Chief Financial Officer
         November 13, 2002
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-KSB/A-1
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission File Number: 0-30874
 CANEUM, INC.
  Nevada
    
    33-0916900State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization
    
    I.R.S. Employer I.D. No.3101 West Coast Highway, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA
    
    92663(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (949) 273-4000
 None
 Common Stock, Par Value $.001
 o
 þ o þ o
 o
 o
    o þ




---



##### 



Item 6. Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
  Background
    2




---



##### 



Critical Accounting Policies
  Accounts Receivable
  Intangible Assets
   3




---



##### 



Goodwill
  Stock-Option Compensation
   Expected life in years
    
    
    4-5Volatility
    
    
    71-97
    %Risk free rate of return
    
    
    4.8
    %
   Revenue Recognition
   4




---



##### 



Cost of Revenue
  Results of Operations
 Revenue
  Cost of revenue and gross profit
  Operating expenses
   5




---



##### 



Net loss
  Liquidity and Capital Resources
   6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
  Recent Accounting Pronouncements
   8




---



##### 



Forward-Looking Statements
  Item 13. Exhibits
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description31.1
    
    
    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Executive Officer31.2
    
    
    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Financial Officer
   Caneum, Inc.Date: December 17, 2007
    By:
    -s- Suki MudanSuki Mudan, President(Principal Executive Officer)  9
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                 5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                       JUL-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                            JAN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                   14,995,000
<SECURITIES>                                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            13,124,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                              13,933,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         68,844,000
<PP&E>                                                                  515,033,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          992,761,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   169,703,000
<BONDS>                                                                 127,195,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   190,518,000
<PREFERRED>                                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                                    305,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                              193,807,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            992,761,000
<SALES>                                                                  24,696,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        149,982,000
<CGS>                                                                    25,770,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           128,308,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         27,036,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       17,130,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        (46,618,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           (15,000,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    (31,618,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             621,000
<CHANGES>                                                                   704,000
<NET-INCOME>                                                           (43,078,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                (1.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                (1.42)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 99-794

KENNETH M. CARPENTER, APPELLANT,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and FARLEY,

HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

On June 21, 2001, the full Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the April 6, 1999,

Board of Veterans' Appeals decision which found that the total fees charged by the appellant,

Kenneth M. Carpenter, for his representation of veteran, Victor S. Weatherspoon, were excessive

and unreasonable. On October 18, 2001, the Secretary filed a motion for reconsideration. The

appellant filed a response, urging the Court to reconsider the matter for different reasons. Upon

consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that the Secretary's motion for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: February 15, 2002 PER CURIAM.

KRAMER, Chief Judge, dissenting: For the reasons stated in my dissent to the June 21,

2001, full Court opinion, Carpenter v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 64, 92-97 (2001) (en banc) (Kramer,

C.J., dissenting), I voted for reconsideration. In regard to that dissent, I note the recent repeal of

section 402 of the Veterans' Judicial Review Act (VJRA), Pub. L. No. 100-687, § 402, 102 Stat.

4107, 4122 (1988) (found at 38 U.S.C. § 7251 note) ("Chapter 72 of title 38, United States Code,

. . . shall apply with respect to any case in which a notice of disagreement [(NOD)] is filed . . . on

or after [November 18, 1988]"). Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, Pub. L.

No. 107-103, § 603(a), 115 Stat. 976, 999 (2001). Nevertheless, this Court's jurisdiction is

derivative generally of the Board of Veterans' Appeals' (Board) jurisdiction, 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a),

and, absent original jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C. § 5904(c)(2) or otherwise, it would appear that the

Board's jurisdiction is dependent on the appellant's having filed an NOD, 38 U.S.C. § 7105(a), (c);

see Marsh v. West, 11 Vet.App. 468, 470 (1998); Garlejo v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 229, 232 (1997).

Hence, the repeal of VJRA § 402 has not eliminated the Court's need to address this important

jurisdictional matter.
2

STEINBERG, Judge, dissenting: I voted to grant full Court reconsideration in this case, for

the reasons stated in my dissent to the June 21, 2001, en banc opinion, Carpenter v. Principi,

15 Vet.App. 64, 79 (2001) (Steinberg, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), except for part

II.C.1., regarding the Court's jurisdiction in terms of the failure to discuss section 402 of the

Veterans' Judicial Review Act, Pub. L. No. 100-687, § 402, 102 Stat. 4105, 4122 (1988) [hereinafter

VJRA § 402], which has been repealed by the Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of

2001, Pub. L. No. 107-103, § 603(a), 115 Stat. 976, 999; see also id. at § 603(d) (making repeal of

VJRA § 402 applicable to all pending and subsequent claims). I therefore respectfully dissent.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NOS. 95-1068 AND 99-1250

HUGH D. COX, APPELLANT/PETITIONER,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE/RESPONDENT.

SAMUEL MOSLEY, INTERVENOR.

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and FARLEY,

HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

On November 14, 2001, the Court granted, in part, the Secretary's motion for reconsideration,

but reaffirmed its October 6, 2000, opinion, and issued an order that contained additional analysis.

On December 5, 2001, the Secretary renewed his motion for a full Court decision, which was

contained in the November 7, 2000, motion for reconsideration.

Motions for a full Court decision are not favored. Ordinarily they will not be granted unless

such action is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court's decisions or to resolve a

question of exceptional importance. In this appeal, the Secretary has not shown that either basis

exists to warrant a full Court decision.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the record on appeal, and the Secretary's motion for a

full Court decision, it is 

ORDERED that the motion for a full Court decision is denied.

DATED: April 11, 2002 PER CURIAM.

STEINBERG, Judge, concurring: For the reasons set forth in my concurring statement in

the order of the en banc Court denying the Secretary's motion for full-Court consideration in the

companion case of Snyder v. Principi, Nos. 98-2219 and 99-1164, order at 1-10, I voted against the

motion in this case as well.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 03-23 

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

 Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled 

by the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge Mary J. Schoelen, 

having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The Chief 

Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Schoelen would provide substantial service 

necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

 Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

 ORDERED that, effective January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, recall-eligible retired 

Judge Schoelen is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). Judge 

Schoelen shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active 

service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. 

It is further 

 ORDERED that Judge Schoelen shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2023 to review 

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other substantial service 

at the request of the Chief Judge and she shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up to 90 days 

or its equivalent. With her consent, Judge Schoelen's service may be extended beyond 90 days. 

 

DATED: January 3, 2023 BY THE COURT: 

MARGARET BARTLEY 

 Chief Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-49012) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan, 2000 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our report dated January 29, 2001, with
respect to the financial statements and schedule of Endwave Corporation
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2000.

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 28, 2001

                                       52
#### Inas S. SHAABAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COVENANT AVIATION SECURITY, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-17763.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 2011.

Filed April 26, 2011.

Michael Edward Adams, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael E. Adams, Redwood City, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kurt Bockes, Joseph A. Schwachter, Esquire, Littler Mendelson, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: FERNANDEZ and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and WELLS, Senior District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Lesley Wells, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Inas Shaaban challenges the district court’s summary dismissal of her suit alleging her termination from Covenant Aviation Security violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Ms. Shaaban asserts the doctrines of equitable estoppel and equitable tolling prevent Covenant from asserting that her FMLA leave ended prior to 1 October 2007.

*639In order to assert equitable estoppel, Ms. Shaaban must demonstrate reasonable reliance on Covenant’s conduct or representations regarding approval of the duration of her FMLA leave. *See Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.,*467 U.S. 51, 60, 66, 104 S.Ct. 2218, 81 L.Ed.2d 42 (1984); *Naton v. Bank of California,*649 F.2d 691, 696 (9th Cir.1981). Ms. Shaaban unreasonably assumed that Covenant’s verbal approval of her FMLA leave eligibility also encompassed the duration of the approved leave. Further, Ms. Shaaban did not exhibit reasonable reliance when she failed to review the expected and received written terms of her FMLA approved leave. Finally, Ms. Shaaban’s lack of reasonable reliance extinguishes her equitable tolling claim.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report of Las Palmas Mobile
Estates (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Diana L. Hassan,  Treasurer of the Company,  hereby certifies for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 (the  "Exchange  Act") and  Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: March 12, 2007                     By: /s/ DIANA L. HASSAN
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Diana L. Hassan
                                          Treasurer and Director



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO LAS PALMAS  MOBILE  ESTATES,  AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY LAS PALMAS MOBILE  ESTATES,  AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# USCIS Anuncia Nuevas Guías sobre el Periodo de Validez del Formulario I-693

04/04/2024

El Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de Estados Unidos anunció (PDF, 317.28 KB) hoy que cualquier Formulario I-693, Informe de Examen Médico y Registro de Vacunación, que fue debidamente completado y firmado por un médico civil en o después del 1 de noviembre de 2023, no caduca y puede usarse indefinidamente como evidencia de que el solicitante no es inadmisible por motivos relacionados con la salud.

En consulta con los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC), y con base en los avances en la notificación electrónica de salud pública, USCIS ha determinado que el valor del Formulario I-693 como evidencia no se debe limitar a un cierto período si ha sido debidamente completado y firmado por un médico civil a partir del 1 de noviembre de 2023. Los oficiales de USCIS tienen la discreción de solicitar evidencia adicional o un Formulario I-693 nuevo o actualizado si tienen razones para creer que la condición médica del solicitante ha cambiado desde que el médico civil firmó el Formulario I-693, o que el Formulario I-693 presentado no refleja con precisión la condición médica del solicitante y el solicitante puede ser inadmisible por motivos relacionados con la salud.

Si los exámenes médicos de inmigración de un solicitante se completaron antes del 1 de noviembre de 2023, la política anterior aún se aplica. Antes del 1 de noviembre de 2023, los médicos civiles no necesitaban compartir o reportar cierta información a los CDC electrónicamente. USCIS ha consultado con los CDC y ha determinado que un Formulario I-693 debidamente completado y firmado por un médico civil antes del 1 de noviembre de 2023, continúa conservando valor de evidencia durante dos años a partir de la fecha de la firma del médico civil, con la excepción de los Formularios I-693 presentados por las personas que tienen un permiso de permanencia temporal (“parole”) bajo Operación Bienvenidos Aliados, cuyos Formularios I-693, a través de la política y en consulta con los CDC, conservan su valor de evidencia por tres años a partir de la fecha de la firma del médico civil. Para obtener información adicional, vea el Manual de Políticas de USCIS, Volumen 8, Parte B, Capítulo 4.

Para información adicional, vea las guías actualizadas en el Manual de Política de USCIS.

04/04/2024

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allergy Research Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dr. Stephen A. Levine, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 16, 2005

                                          By: /s/ Stephen A. Levine
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Dr. Stephen A. Levine
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Allergy Research Group, Inc. and
will be retained by Allergy Research Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 11 of 25


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(c)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-A
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Bank One, National Association              Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126              fka, Bankers Trust Company
Chicago, IL 60670                           280 Park Avenue 9th Floor
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration        New York, NY 10017
Phone: (312) 407-0192                       Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Fax:   (312) 407-1708                             Structured Finance
                                            Phone: (212) 454-4298
                                            Fax:   (212) 454-2331

Key Bank USA, National Association          MBIA Insurance Corporation.
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor                 113 King Street
Cleveland, OH 44114                         Armonk, NY 10504
ATTN: Senior Vice President                 ATTN: Data Administration
Key Education Resources                     Phone: (914) 765-3772
Phone:  (216) 828-9342                      Fax:   (914) 765-3810
Fax:    (216) 828-9417


Pursuant to Section 3.08 of the Subservicing Agreement between Key Bank USA,
National Association as Master Servicer and Great Lakes Educational Loan
Services, Inc., as Subservicer, dated as of June 1, 2000 (the "Agreement"), the
undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
Subservicer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2002, and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

The undersigned also hereby certifies that the Subservicer has disclosed to the
Master Servicer and to the Trust's certified public accountants all significant
deficiencies relating to the Subservicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards in accordance with a review conducted in compliance with the standard
as set forth in the Agreement.


                                   Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.,
                                   Subservicer

Date:  March 26, 2003              By:    /S/ MICHAEL J. NOACK
                                      ------------------------------
                                   Name: Michael J. Noack
                                   Title: Chief Servicing Officer