alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5773 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5773

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2010

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 
      Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 
  Administration Operations Building, as the ``Robert M. Ball Federal 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 
Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 
Administration Operations Building, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Robert M. Ball Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert M. Ball 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
H. R. 5773 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in Baltimore, 

Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security Administration Operations 

Building, as the ‘‘Robert M. Ball Federal Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 

Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 

Administration Operations Building, shall be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Robert M. Ball Federal Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred 

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert 

M. Ball Federal Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit
  13.1

HOLMES
  FINANCING (NO. 8) PLC 
  ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE 
  2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE 
  LONDON NW1 3AN

Certification
  
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
  Code)

Pursuant
  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
  section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer
  of the servicer does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
  Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form
  20-F) of Holmes Financing (No. 9) PLC (the Company)
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of the Company.

|Dated: 
      June 27, 2006 | /s/
      Chris Fielding                          
|--------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                            | Chris
      Fielding                              
|                            | Head of
      Securitisation and Treasury Advisory
|                            | Services                                          

A
  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CALCULATION OF EARNINGS (DEFICIENCY) TO FIXED CHARGES                                             (IN THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                    12/31/2000
                                                                                              ------------------------
<S>                                                                                            <C>
Earnings
Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes                                          $              (948)
Adjustment for undistributed income
Distributions from affiliates

Fixed Charges                                                                                               28,211
Depreciation of previously capitalized interest
Interest Capitalized                                                                                       (24,966)
                                                                                              ------------------------
Earnings                                                                                      $              2,297
                                                                                              ========================

Fixed Charges
Interest expense and capitalized amounts
(including construction related fixed charges)                                                              27,565
Net amortization of issuance costs (including capitalized amounts)                                             646
                                                                                              ------------------------
Fixed charges                                                                                   $           28,211
                                                                                              ========================


Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges                                                         $          (25,914)
                                                                                              ========================
</TABLE>
Exhibit
  13.1

HOLMES
  FINANCING (NO. 7) PLC 04645659

ABBEY
  NATIONAL HOUSE 
  2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE LONDON NW1 3AN

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
  18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of the servicer does hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004
(the Form 20-F) of Holmes Financing (No. 7) PLC (the Company)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|Dated: June
      30, 2005 | /s/ Chris Fielding
|-------------------------- | ------------------
|                           | Chris Fielding    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5911 

To modify the boundary of Rocky Mountain National Park, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2010 

Ms. MARKEY of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of Rocky Mountain National Park, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rocky Mountain Na5 tional Park Boundary Modification Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK. 

7 (a) MODIFICATION OF BOUNDARY.—The boundary of 

8 Rocky Mountain National Park is modified by— 

9 (1) removing approximately 11.61 acres, known 

10 as the ‘‘Winters property’’; and 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5911 IH

1 (2) adding two parcels of federally owned land, 

2 consisting of approximately 33.88 acres. 

3 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The lands described in 

4 subsection (a) are generally depicted on the map entitled 

5 ‘‘Rocky Mountain National Park Proposed Boundary Re6 vision’’, numbered 121/80,159B, and dated June 2010. 

7 (c) MAP.—The map referred to in subsection (b) shall 

8 be on file and available for inspection in the appropriate 

9 offices of the National Park Service, Department of the 

10 Interior. 

11 (d) ADMINISTRAION OF LAND.—Lands added to the 

12 park in subsection (a) shall be administered by the Sec13 retary of the Interior as part of the Rocky Mountain Na14 tional Park in accordance with applicable laws and regula15 tions. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**
 **OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I, Derry
L. Behm, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Capital Growth Systems,
Inc.;
  2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
  (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and
  5. The small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.
  ****Date: May 4, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Derry L.
BehmDerry L. BehmChief Financial and Accounting
      Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -
NO. 22-0118 MARTY G. RINGHAM AND PREMIERE PLUS REALTY COMPANY v. CRAIG BERNSTEIN AND VARNA BERNSTEIN § § § § § § Dallas County, 5th District.

September 2, 2022 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.  I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioner, MARTY G. RINGHAM AND PREMIERE PLUS REALTY COMPANY, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 7th day of October, 2022.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 12



HOLMES FINANCING (NO.1) PLC

03946294



ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE

2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE

LONDON NW1 3AN



I, Martin McDermott,
certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all
reports on Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of HOLMES FINANCING (NO.1) PLC;



2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided
to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and upon representations made to me by the servicer, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and



5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies
relating to the servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon representations made to me by the servicer.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Abbey National plc.



Date: June 30, 2004



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/ Martin McDermott
|Martin McDermott    
|Director
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5862 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5862

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to the eligibility 
 of veterans for employment with the Federal Aviation Administration, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2010

 Mr. Marchant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to the eligibility 
 of veterans for employment with the Federal Aviation Administration, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans FAA Employment Fairness Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. VETERAN EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY.

    Section 40122 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(k) Veteran Employment Eligibility.--
            ``(1) In general.--In determining the eligibility of an 
        individual for employment with the Administration, including if 
        eligibility for the applicable position is limited to current 
        or former Federal employees, the Administrator shall treat a 
        period of active military, naval, or air service as providing 
        eligibility for a veteran in the same manner as an equal period 
        of Federal civilian employment provides eligibility for any 
        other individual.
            ``(2) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
        definitions apply:
                    ``(A) Veteran.--The term `veteran' has the meaning 
                given that term in section 101(2) of title 38, United 
                States Code.
                    ``(B) Active military, naval, or air service.--The 
                term `active military, naval, or air service' has the 
                meaning given that term in section 101(24) of title 38, 
                United States Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6020

THOMAS A. CHILTON, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA KELLY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District 

Judge. (3:10-cv-00871-JRS)

Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas A. Chilton, III, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge 

Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Chilton, III, seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Chilton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny Chilton’s motions for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Quality Mammography Standards; Lay Summaries for Patients” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     In the                    **Federal Register**                     of October 18, 1999 (64 FR 56210), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0426.  The approval expires on December 31, 2002.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: January 10, 2000. 

William K. Hubbard, 

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation. 

[FR Doc. 00-987 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 2-02

IN RE: RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and FARLEY, HOLDAWAY,

IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED that Ronald L. Smith, Esq., is redesignated as Chair, for a term as Chair

ending November 6, 2004, and that Robert F. Comeau, Esq., is reappointed as a member of the

Committee for a term ending November 16, 2004.

DATED: November 6, 2002 BY THE COURT:

KENNETH B. KRAMER

Chief Judge
Order entered April 10, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 00639
- CR
VICENTE BARRUETA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11
- 70647
- J



### O RDER Before Justices O’Neill, Francis, and Fillmore
The Court GRANTS the State’s April 8, 2013 motion to extend time to file its brief. We
ORDER the State’s brief received on April 8, 2013 filed as of the date of this order

. We D ENY the State’s April 8, 2013 motion to postpone submission. The appeal will be submitted as scheduled on May 22, 2013.
/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS PRESIDING JUSTICE
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vivian Chu, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: May 23, 2005

/s/ Vivian Chu
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be
retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```