alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. PL21-3-000]

Take notice that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) will convene a Commission staff-led technical conference to discuss methods natural gas companies may use to mitigate the effects of direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions resulting from Natural Gas Act sections 3 and 7 authorizations. The technical conference will be held on Friday, November 19, 2021, from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time. The conference will be held virtually.

                    The conference will be open for the public to attend virtually, and there is no fee for attendance. Supplemental notices will be issued prior to the conference with further details regarding the agenda and how to participate as a panelist. Information on this technical conference will also be posted on the Calendar of Events on the Commission's website,                     *www.ferc.gov,*                     prior to the event. Transcripts will be available for a fee from Ace Reporting, (202) 347-3700.                

                    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please send an email to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov,*                     call toll-free (866) 208-3372 (voice) or (202) 208-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    For more information about this technical conference, please contact                     *GHGTechConf@ferc.gov.*                     For information related to logistics, please contact Sarah McKinley at                     *sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov*                     or (202) 502-8368. This notice is issued and published in accordance with 18 CFR 2.1.                

Dated: September 16, 2021.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-20485 Filed 9-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
---

---

Exhibit 10.1

Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (Forms S-8 No. 333-54356, 333-117849 and
333-136633) pertaining to the 2003 Share Option Plan of Ceragon Networks Ltd. of our
reports dated March 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Ceragon Networks Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of Ceragon Networks Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended
December 31, 2007.

|Tel-Aviv, IsraelMarch 26, 2008 |  | /s/      KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER
KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global
|------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Glen R. Gamble
                                  ------------------------
                                  Glen R. Gamble
                                  Chief Executive Officer

February 13, 2009
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 02-22 

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R 

 Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled 

by the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William P. Greene, 

Jr., having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The Chief 

Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Greene would provide substantial service 

necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that, effective January 6, 2022, through December 31, 2022, recall-eligible 

retired Judge Greene is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). 

Judge Greene shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in 

active service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief 

Judge. It is further 

ORDERED that Judge Greene shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2022 to review 

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other substantial service 

at the request of the Chief Judge and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up to 90 days or 

its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Greene's service may be extended beyond 90 days or its 

equivalent. 

DATED: January 6, 2022 BY THE COURT: 

MARGARET BARTLEY 

Chief Judge
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5877 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 655 Centre Street in Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Alexander Scott 

Arredondo, United States Marine Corps Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5877 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ALEXANDER SCOTT 

2 ARREDONDO, UNITED STATES MARINE 

3 CORPS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 655 Centre Street in Jamaica 

6 Plain, Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Lance Corporal Alexander Scott Arredondo, United 

8 States Marine Corps Post Office Building’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

12 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Alex13 ander Scott Arredondo, United States Marine Corps Post 

14 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50086 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MAURICIO PERALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-1409-ALL-PM

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mauricio Perales appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Perales contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Perales maintains that he pleaded guilty to anNo. 03-50086 -2- indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Perales acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 32(b)

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, James M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report")
                  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 9, 2005

                                              /s/ James M. Sullivan
                                              ---------------------
                                              James M. Sullivan
                                              Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc.
and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. R. 6102 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to extend 

the authority of the Secretary of the Navy to enter into multiyear contracts 

for F/A–18E, F/A–18F, and EA–18G aircraft. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR F/A–18E, F/ 

A–18F, AND EA–18G AIRCRAFT. 

(a) EXTENSION OF CERTIFICATION.—Paragraph (2) of section 

128(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2217) is amended by striking 

‘‘a reference to March’’ and inserting ‘‘a reference to September’’. 

(b) REQUIRED AUTHORITY.—Such section 128 is further amended 

by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(e) REQUIRED AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with respect to a multiyear contract entered into under 

subsection (a), this section shall be deemed to meet the requirements under subsection (i)(3) and (l)(3) of section 2306b of title 

10, United States Code.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FRED MEYER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
(In Thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                    16 Weeks        16 Weeks
                                                       Ended           Ended
                                                      May 23,         May 24,
                                                        1998            1997
                                                  ----------      ----------
<S>                                               <C>             <C>       
Basic earnings per common share
   Weighted average number
     of shares outstanding                           145,141          84,758
                                                  ==========      ==========
   Income (loss) before extraordinary
     charge                                       $  (95,553)     $   22,513
   Extraordinary charge                             (216,441)               -
                                                  ----------      ----------
   Net income (loss)                              $ (311,994)     $   22,513
                                                  ==========      ==========
   Per share calculation
     Income (loss) before extraordinary
       charge                                     $    (0.66)     $     0.27
     Extraordinary charge                              (1.49)              -
                                                  ----------      ----------
     Net income (loss)                            $    (2.15)     $     0.27
                                                  ==========      ==========
   Diluted earnings per common share
     Weighted average number
       of shares outstanding                         145,141          84,758
     The effect of options outstanding
       during the period using the
       treasury stock method                               -           3,577
                                                  ----------      ----------
     Weighted average number of common
       and common equivalent shares
       outstanding                                   145,141          88,335
                                                  ==========      ==========
     Income (loss) before extraordinary
       charge                                     $  (95,553)     $   22,513
     Extraordinary charge                           (216,441)              -
                                                  ----------      ----------
     Net income (loss)                            $ (311,994)     $   22,513
                                                  ==========      ==========
     Per share calculation
       Income (loss) before extraordinary
         charge                                   $    (0.66)     $     0.25
       Extraordinary charge                            (1.49)              -
                                                  ----------      ----------
       Net income (loss)                          $    (2.15)     $     0.25
                                                  ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Rajal Wisdom, Respondent.

— Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), *513dated April 8, 1986, which, after a hearing, granted those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and a statement made by the defendant to the police.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

On January 3, 1986, at about 7:00 p.m., Police Officer Keith Rail and his partner responded to a radio run based upon a citizen’s telephone call of a black male dressed all in beige with a gun at 107-43 135th Street in Queens County. They arrived in an unmarked police car at the location within one minute and observed five black males standing together. Officer Rail immediately approached the defendant, who was dressed in beige, and, without any preliminary inquiry, quickly patted him down. Finding nothing, the officers then placed all five men against a car and "patted them down systematically”. A gun was discovered in the defendant’s waistband and, when asked if he had a license for that gun, the defendant responded "No”. The five men were handcuffed and removed from the scene in a radio car. Prior to handcuffing the men, Officer Rail was in communication, through central communications, with the citizen informant who would not come to the scene and identify the suspect himself. He did, however, come to the scene and speak with the officers after the five men were removed. The hearing court suppressed the gun and the statement.

The police had no justification for frisking and then searching the defendant based upon the uncorroborated information known to them at that time. The description was very general, there was no identification that the gun had just been used in a crime *(cf. People v Green,*35 NY2d 193), and the officer did not personally observe anything at the scene which would have warranted the actions taken *(see, People v La Pene,*40 NY2d 210, 221). The communication with the informant did not give rise to a reasonable suspicion since that conversation did not occur until after the police had completed the seizure, frisk and search of the defendant *(see, People v La Pene, supra,*at p 222). Here, the circumstances initially warranted only the limited intrusion of a stop to inquire *(see, Terry v Ohio,*392 US 1; *People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210). Further, as the frisk did not result in the discovery of any gun, the subsequent intrusive conduct of the police was unjustified *(see, People v Battaglia,*56 NY2d 558). The ensuing search being illegal, the fruits thereof, including the weapon and the defendant’s statement, were properly suppressed *(see, Wong Sun v United States,*371 US 471; *People v Cantor,*36 NY2d 106; *People v*
      *514
      *Richardson,*114 AD2d 473; *People v Brown,*112 AD2d 945). Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Gary  Musselman,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial
Officer. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacel Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   Board  of  Directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a. all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated: May 20, 2004


By: /s/ Gary Musselman
----------------------------------
Gary Musselman, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer.
```

                                                                                        Exhibit 32.2

                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation  (the "Company") for
    the quarter ended  April 3, 2004  as filed  with the  Securities and Exchange Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the
    "Report"), I, Robin Cohan,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant
    to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
             1934; and

       (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition
             and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     / /s/ Robin Cohan
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------
                                                     Robin Cohan
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     May 11, 2004
```