alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Torrey *v.*Burney.

Appeal from Jefferson Probate Court.

Heard before the Hon. M. T. Porter.

Bush& Bush and H. C. Selheimer, for appellant.

Tillman & Campbell, for appellee.

Opinion by

Sharpe, J.

This is a contest of the will of Samuel Torrey, deceased, which was filed for probate by the appellee, William T. Burney; the contest being instituted by H. W. Torrey, the appellant. This appeal is prosecuted from the judgment rendered in the contest of the will of Samuel Torrey, deceased, admitting said will to probate. The principal.grounds of objection to the probate of the will were unsoundness of mind and undue influence, and there was evidence tending to support each of these grounds. The contestant was the only son and child of the testator, being'the son of a former wife. By terms of the Avill all the testator’s property was devised and bequeathed to his AvidoAV, Jane E. Torrey, by whom testator had no children living at the time of the execution of the will.

There are but two assignments of error, both of Avhicli relate to the admission of evidence against the objection of appellant. The first relates to the admission of parol proof of the contents of a clipping from a newspaper published in Tennessee, Avhieh the witness had received in a letter and had shoAvn (but did not read) to the testator in the year 1881 or 1882, containing a statement to the effect that contestant, Avhile having a wife and children living in Cullman, Ala., had contracted a second marriage in Tennessee. The second assignment relates to the admission of proof of the truth of the information that said second marriage was entered into.

It is held that the court did not err in its rulings upon the eAddence. The judgment is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section      1350**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

|   | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 6, 2007 | /s/  Jeffry                N. Quinn                                              |
|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       | Jeffry                N. Quinn                                                             |
|                                       | President,                Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the                Board |
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

FEBRUARY 16, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED101986 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RYAN HUDSON, APP

2. ED102515 IN THE MATTER OF: ISADORE LOWERY

3. ED102574 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JERRY OUSLEY, APP

4. ED102666 DARRIN M. MCCALL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

5. ED102770 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SEAN JONES, APP

6. ED102784 BROOKE BRICKER, RES. V JAMES BRICKER APP.

7. ED102797 ARIEL BLANKENSHIP

- YEP, RES V HEYL TRUCK LINES,

APP

8. ED103050 JACQUELINE N. WALKER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

9. ED103109 RAYMOND J. NIXON, APP V STATE OF MISSO URI, RES
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONTIFINANCIAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 58,646
<SECURITIES>                                          561,372
<RECEIVABLES>                                         603,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                           (4,773)
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                 33,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (12,002)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,309,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  477
<OTHER-SE>                                            (32,792)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1,309,235
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      (18,721)
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      164,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        1,953
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     42,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (227,463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           10,268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (237,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (237,717)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (5.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (5.12)


</TABLE>
# Responses to Formal Recommendations

The Ombudsman makes recommendations to USCIS on how to improve services, increase efficiencies, and provide a more meaningful experience. USCIS takes these recommendations seriously and reviews them thoroughly. Where possible, USCIS implements the Ombudsman’s recommendations; however, due to operational limitations or the priorities of the agency, USCIS may not implement a recommendation made by the Ombudsman. For more information, please visit the Department of Homeland Security Recommendations by the CIS Ombudsman.

Response to Recommendations on Parole for Eligible U Visa Principal and Derivative Petitioners Residing Abroad  (PDF, 378.82 KB)

September 29, 2016

Response to Recommendations on Special Immigrant Juvenile Adjudications  (PDF, 325.05 KB)

September 28, 2016

1 - 2 total rows

-  Back
- Next 

    RSS Feed  

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 32.1


                             AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY

                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Fair, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: December 14, 2005

                                       By:  /s/ William J. Fair
                                       ----------------------------
                                       William J. Fair
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

(SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Noel J. Guillama, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment 1, of The Quantum Group, Inc. for the year ended October 31, 2007;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d) -15(e) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.





Date:  September 19, 2008

/s/Noel J. Guillama

Noel J. Guillama

President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
      13.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      John
      A.A. James, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Metals (BVI) Limited
      (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December
                31, 2005 which this certification accompanies fully complies with
                the
                requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act of
                1934: and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:
                June 13, 2007
            (s)*John
                A.A. James*John
                A.A. JamesPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
# In-Home Citizenship Tutoring Program

**In-Home Citizenship Tutoring Program with the Kentucky Refugee Ministries in Lexington and Louisville, KY**

Kentucky Refugee Ministries (KRM) was founded in 1990 with the mission of resettling refugees in Louisville, Kentucky, and the surrounding region. KRM has since expanded its range of services to include ESL and cultural orientation, employment assistance, interpretation services, support on immigration and naturalization, and many others. KRM received the Citizenship and Integration Grant in 2017. KRM provides immigration legal services in Louisville, Lexington, and northern Kentucky, while providing citizenship classes at a range of times and locations to accommodate as much of the community as possible. Several years ago, citizenship program staff recognized that some students were facing barriers preventing them from attending the regularly scheduled citizenship classes, which in some cases led them to fail one or more naturalization interviews. In response, KRM developed an in-home tutoring program, where they could match high-needs students with community volunteers who would bring the citizenship preparation services to them. 

In previous years, KRM had assigned tutors to students who needed help outside of the classroom, but because they had not yet applied for citizenship it was difficult to focus on the areas where the student needed the most assistance. This would sometimes result in students and volunteers losing motivation. As a part of KRM’s efforts to keep students engaged and progressing, classroom volunteers have been more strategically used to ensure students of varying abilities receive small group instruction and more individualized attention. This approach also helps KRM select students for the in-home tutoring program, specifically, individuals who are becoming disengaged or those who have failed previous naturalization interviews.

KRM has received positive feedback on this practice from both students and volunteers. The new in-home tutoring program, with the interview date as their deadline and a successful outcome as their goal, provides both the students and volunteers with a stronger sense of accomplishment. Sasha*(see photo) became a participant in the in-home tutoring program after failing the reading and writing portions of the citizenship test twice and voicing her challenges with attending classes. The citizenship coordinator developed a study plan to guide the tutor, who met once or twice a week with Sasha for four months until she felt confident enough to re-submit her N-400 application. Sasha has since passed the naturalization exam and became a naturalized citizen in February 2019. By bringing citizenship preparation services to the students at home and developing individualized plans to lead them to success, KRM is able to broaden their impact in the lawful permanent resident community and provide critical information and services to many who may not have had access to them previously.   

12/08/2021

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

IVAN T. HOLLOWAY, SR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 889 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20959-20960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9765]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL00-68-000]


Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission and the City 
of Harrisonville, Missouri v. UtiliCorp United Inc.; Notice of 
Complaint

April 13, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 11, 2000, the City of Harrisonville, 
Missouri and the Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission 
on behalf of its member cities El Dorado Springs, Odessa, and Rich 
Hill, Missouri, filed a complaint against UtiliCorp United Inc. d/b/a 
Missouri Public Service (MPS). The complaint asserts that MPS has 
recovered certain impermissible purchased power expenses through MPS's 
fuel adjustment clause (FAC), in violation of the filed rate and the 
Commission's fuel clause regulations, 18 CFR 35.14. The complaint 
requests that the Commission: (1) Initiate an audit and investigation 
of MPS's application of the fuel adjustment clause, (2) by issuing a 
notice of rate examination and/or order to show cause under 18 CFR 
385.209, require MPS to bear the burden of demonstrating in that audit 
and investigation that it has not included any improper energy purchase 
costs in its FAC billings from at least 1997 to date, and (3) require 
MPS to provide refunds (with interest) as appropriate to reflect 
correct application of the FAC, i.e., elimination of all improper 
purchased energy costs, with respect to all relevant periods. The 
complainants also request consolidation of this proceeding with the 
complaint in Docket No. EL00-43-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before May 1, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to

[[Page 20960]]

the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Answers to the 
complaint shall also be due on or before May 1, 2000.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9765 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          SEP-30-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               JUN-30-2000
[CASH]
[SECURITIES]
[RECEIVABLES]
[ALLOWANCES]
[INVENTORY]
[CURRENT-ASSETS]
[PP&E]
[DEPRECIATION]
[TOTAL-ASSETS]
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]
[BONDS]
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]
[PREFERRED]
[COMMON]
[OTHER-SE]
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]
[SALES]
[TOTAL-REVENUES]
[CGS]
[TOTAL-COSTS]
[OTHER-EXPENSES]
[LOSS-PROVISION]
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]
[INCOME-PRETAX]
[INCOME-TAX]
[INCOME-CONTINUING]
[DISCONTINUED]
[EXTRAORDINARY]
[CHANGES]
[NET-INCOME]
[EPS-BASIC]
[EPS-DILUTED]
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Caneum, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: March 25, 2004 /s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan
Sukhbir Singh Mudan, President and
Treasurer (Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)