alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Outstanding Americans by Choice

The **Outstanding Americans by Choice** initiative recognizes the outstanding achievements of naturalized U.S. citizens. Through civic participation, professional achievement, and responsible citizenship, recipients of this honor have demonstrated their commitment to this country and to the common civic values that unite us as Americans.

USCIS will recognize naturalized citizens who have made significant contributions to both their community and their adopted country on a case-by-case basis.

For more information about the initiative, please see this fact sheet (PDF, 76.26 KB).Note: The following biographies have been provided by the ABC recipients.

### 2024

Channy Chhi Laux, Author and Chef

Read More

Luz Escamilla, Utah State Senator

Read More

### 2023

Satya Nadella, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Microsoft

Read More

Raúl Ruiz, Congressman, California, 25th District

Read More

Dmitri Alperovitch, Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, Silverado Policy Accelerator

Read More

Liana Adrong, Executive Director, Montagnard Dega Association, Greensboro, NC

Read More

Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha, Associate Dean for Public Health and C. S. Mott Endowed Professor of Public Health, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint, MI

Read More

Rev. Eugene Cho, President and CEO, Bread for the World, Washington, DC

Read More

### 2022

Brigadier General & Deputy Commanding General Stephen L. A. Michael (Ret.), U.S. Army, Kansas City, MO

Read More

Anna Zaibel Blau, Executive Director, International Women's House, Atlanta, GA 

Read More

1 - 10 total rows

-  Back
- Next**

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 04-06

IN RE: COURT CLOSED ON MONDAY, JULY 3, 2006

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will

be closed on Monday, July 3, 2006.

For purposes of computation of time, under the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure,

 July 3, 2006, will be considered a day when the Clerk's office has been closed. See U.S. VET. APP.

R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: June 21, 2006 FOR THE COURT:

NORMAN Y. HERRING

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alberto DiBella, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 16, 2010






/s/ Alberto DiBella


Alberto DiBella


Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
# Password Resets and Technical Support

Visit the links below for additional information:
                - How to Reset My Password
                - How Do I Unlock My Online Account?
                - How Do I Change My Two-Step Verification Code?
                - How Do I Get a New Online Access Code?
                - How Can I Delete My USCIS Online Account?

**For additional USCIS Online Account help**

For technical help regarding any of the issues listed above, go to my.uscis.gov/account/v1/needhelp, or you can send us a message from your USCIS online account inbox.

**For FOIA related issues**

If you have questions about FOIA, email us at FOIAPAQuestions@uscis.dhs.gov.

**For myE-Verify related issues**

If you have questions about myE‐Verify, please visit myEverify.

09/21/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5998 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5998

To repeal the enhanced compensation structure reporting requirement of 
     the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

Mr. Hensarling introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the enhanced compensation structure reporting requirement of 
     the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act is hereby repealed.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--The table of contents for such Act is 
amended by striking the item relating to section 956.
                                 <all>
```
#### Gerson Norberto ORDONEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-73991.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2011.*

Filed March 28, 2011.

William J. Baker, Moreno & Associates, Chula Vista, CA, for Petitioner.

Genevieve Holm, OIL, Manuel Palau, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Gerson Norberto Ordonez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying ap*686plication for asylum and withholding of removal.1 Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal because Ordonez failed to establish that guerrillas threatened him on account of a protected ground. *See I.N.S. v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 482-83, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (holding that forced recruitment alone is not enough to show persecution on account of political opinion).

We decline to address Ordonez’s unexhausted contention that he is eligible for a grant of humanitarian asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d); *Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS,*213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2000) (declining to consider a claim that Board did not have first opportunity to consider).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Petitioner does not challenge the denial of his applications for protection under the Convention Against Torture or cancellation of removal.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 99-661

DANIEL W. AMBROSE, APPELLANT,

 V.

TOGO D. WEST, JR.,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY,

HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

On February 22, 2000, as part of his proffered brief, the appellant filed a motion for an initial

full Court consideration of this appeal. 

Motions for a full Court decision are not favored. Ordinarily they will not be granted unless

such action is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court's decisions or to resolve a

question of exceptional importance. In this appeal, the appellant has not shown that either basis

exists to warrant a full Court decision.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the record on appeal, the appellant's motion for a full

Court decision, and the appellant's brief, it is 

ORDERED that the motion for an initial full Court decision is DENIED. 

DATED: April 10, 2000 PER CURIAM.

STEINBERG, Judge, dissenting: I do not support the Court's acting on this motion for an

initial full Court decision prior to obtaining a response from the Secretary on that motion,

particularly on the appellant's argument regarding the criteria for a finding of clear and unmistakable

error (CUE) in a prior final VA adjudication. In that regard, I would require the Secretary to address

the argument made by the appellant as to the "or" in the 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(a) (1999) regulatory

provision (between "reversed" and "amended") and in the 38 U.S.C. §§ 5109A and 7111 statutory

provisions (between "reversed" and "revised"), an argument that the Court has never addressed. In

this connection, it is interesting that the new 20 C.F.R. Subpart O regulations (effective 2/12/99) on

BVA-decision CUE use only "revision" (see, e.g., § 20.1400(b), 20.1404(a), (c), (d), 20.1406(a)

("revises"), (b)). 64 Fed. Reg. 2134, 2139 (1999).
# Refugiados y Asilo

Se les puede otorgar estatus de refugiados o asilo a las personas que han sufrido persecución o que temen que se les persiga por razones de raza, religión, nacionalidad, y/o por pertenecer a un cierto grupo social u opinión política.

## Refugiados

El estatus de refugiado es una forma de protección que puede otorgárseles a las personas que satisfacen la definición de refugiados y que constituyen una inquietud humanitaria especial para los Estados Unidos. Generalmente, los refugiados son personas que están fuera de sus países que no pueden o no están dispuestos a volver allí porque temen daños personales graves. Para ver la definición legal de refugiado, consulte la sección 101(a) (42) de la Ley de Inmigración y Nacionalidad (INA, por sus siglas en inglés).

Puede solicitar que se le remita para estatus de refugiado solamente desde fuera de los Estados Unidos. Para mayor información acerca de los refugiados, vea el enlace de Refugiados.

## Asilo

El estatus de asilo es una forma de protección disponible para las personas que:
                - Satisfacen la definición de refugiado
                - Están ya en los Estados Unidos
                - Piden admisión en un puerto de entrada

Puede solicitar asilo en los Estados Unidos sin importar su país de origen o su estatus de inmigración actual. Para mayor información acerca del estatus de asilo, vea el enlace de Asilo.

11/12/2015

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
#               I-865, Sponsor's Notice of Change of Address

Use this form to report a sponsor's new address and/or residence.

## Forms and Document Downloads

Form I-865  (PDF, 417.45 KB)

Instructions for Form I-865  (PDF, 303.76 KB)

## Form Details

11/10/20. We will also accept the 07/17/15 edition. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

You can find the filing fee for Form I-865 by visiting our Fee Schedule page.  

**Filing Tips:** Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.** We will reject and return any unsigned form.

04/03/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#               I-193, Application for Waiver of Passport and/or Visa

**ALERT:** On Jan. 31, 2024, we published a final rule in the Federal Register, that adjusts the fees required for most immigration applications and petitions. The new fees will be effective April 1, 2024.

Applications and petitions postmarked on or after April 1, 2024, must include the new fees or we will not accept them.

What to Know About Sending Us Your Form

The new filing fee is effective for filings postmarked April 1, 2024, and later. If you are filing an acceptable prior form edition on or after April 1, 2024, you must include the new filing fee.

For an alien who is a legal resident of the United States to reenter the United States without the alien's passport and/or visa.

## Forms and Document Downloads

Form I-193  (PDF, 642.82 KB)

## Form Details

03/01/24. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.The new filing fee is effective for filings postmarked April 1, 2024, and later. If you are filing an acceptable prior form edition, you must include the new filing fee.  

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

Local Office with jurisdiction over the port of entry where the alien is entering.

You can find the filing fee for Form I-193 by visiting our Fee Schedule page.  

The fee is effective for filings postmarked April 1, 2024, and later.

**When you send a payment, you agree to pay for a government service. Filing fees are final and non-refundable, regardless of any action we take on your application, petition, or request, or if you withdraw your request.**If you pay by credit card or debit card, you cannot later dispute the payment.

**Filing Tips:**Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.**We will reject and return any unsigned form. 

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 17, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 17, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0525. GAVIN SCOTT WILSON v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 08B1390 09B2007 09B2582
#### Bonnie J. Dwyer et al., Appellants, v Henry Schoeneck, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court did not err when it instructed the jury that it could draw no inference from the pathology report concerning the condition of the parametrial tissue. There was no reference in the report to that structure and no evidence that any portion of it had been sent to the pathologist or was examined by him.

Plaintiff contends that defendant, in his examination before trial, admitted that there is a presumption that a tissue is normal if it is not referred to in the pathology report. Defendant’s statement, however, pertained only to a tissue listed in the body of a report as having been examined, but not discussed in the final diagnosis.

We have examined the record and we find no improper restriction of plaintiff’s right to cross-examination. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J. —medical malpractice.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

May 27, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41227

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RIGOBERTO DE PAZ-RIVAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(2:04-CR-72-ALL)

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

An unpublished per curiam opinion and judgment of remand was

filed in this appeal on April 7, 2005, and the mandate issued on

April 29, 2005. This panel, proceeding s ua sponte

, has now reheard

the captione d appeal and concludes that, in light of the previous

issuance by the district court of an amended judgment that conformed

to the agreed position of the government and the a ppellant, our

original opinion was incorrect in ruling that the district court had

lacked jurisdiction to enter its amended judgment. We are satisfied2

that our judgment vacating the district court’s amended judgment and

remanding for entry of the app ropriate judgment was improvidently

issued. Therefore, in the interest of judicial economy, our

opinion, judgment, and mandate should be and hereby are recalled,

and this appeal is dismissed as moot. In consequence, the amended

judgment of the district court sentencing de Paz under 8 U.S.C. §

1326(a) only, for which the maximum imprisonment was 2 years, stands

as the final judgment of that court.

OPINION, JUDGMENT, AND MANDATE WITHDRAWN; APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT;

AMENDED JUDGMENT OF DISTRICT COURT AND SENTENCE IMPOSED THEREIN

REINSTATED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.51


                          [Omega Cabinets Letterhead]


May 5, 1999



Mr. Earl Lytle
855 Prospect Blvd.
Waterloo, IA  50701

Dear Earl:

The nature of this letter is to serve as a follow up to the conversation that
you and I shared in which you elected to resign from your position as Vice
President, Manufacturing of Omega Cabinets, Ltd. It is with regret that we
accept your resignation, but we understand that your doing so is for personal
family reasons.

It is understood that your resignation is conditional. It is understood that you
will maintain the duties of your position until at which time the Rough Mill
2000 project is complete and facility is producing a deliverable product. In
addition, you agree not to seek employment opportunities that could be deemed to
be in competition with Omega Cabinets, until July 1, 2000.

In consideration of the above, your post-employment package is as follows:

     .    Re-purchase of your equity investments in Omega Cabinets, Ltd. per the
          terms of the shareholders Agreement. Settlement shall include purchase
          of original stock and reconciliation of granted options at a price
          consistent with a calculation for Fair Market Value. Fair Market Value
          to be established on the end of closing day May 31, 1999.

     .    COBRA benefits (see enclosed letter).

     .    Salary continuance for four weeks following official resignation date;
          which shall include all unused vacation to date of severance.

We trust that the considerations listed above are agreeable to you, and that we
can expect that your daily performance will continue at the level you have
displayed in the past.

Please note your agreement and understanding by signing below.

Sincerely,


/s/
Robert L. Moran
President and CEO


Reviewed and Approve:


/s/
________________________  Date:  ________________
EXHIBIT 31.1
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



<PAGE>


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gregory H. Laborde, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10KSB of Infinity  Capital  Group,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.



<PAGE>


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 29, 2006

/s/Gregory H. Laborde
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory H. Laborde, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman