alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Refugee Adjudications: Policy and Procedures

In accordance with section 4(m) of Executive Order 14013, Rebuilding and Enhancing Programs To Resettle Refugees and Planning for the Impact of Climate Change on Migration, 86 F.R. 8839 (Feb. 9, 2021), and considering necessary safeguards for program integrity, USCIS is publishing several current policies and procedures related to the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP).

When we evaluate policies and procedures for publication, we carefully consider the criteria outlined in Executive Order 14013. This includes an individualized determination as to whether:
                - The policy or procedure is current;
                - The policy or procedure is USRAP-related; and
                - We can share the policy or procedure publicly while maintaining necessary safeguards for program integrity.

Please note that while USCIS strives for transparency wherever possible, some published documents may contain redactions that conform with FOIA requirements or maintain necessary safeguards for program integrity. We will update this page periodically as we issue new adjudicative policy and procedures for refugee processing. There may be some delay between when we issue new policies and when we update this page, but we will try to publish relevant materials within 30 days of issuance, in accordance with Executive Order 14013.

02/15/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20999-21000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9720]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Early Therapeutics Development with Phase 2 Emphasis.
    Date: May 8-9, 2000.
    Time: 8 am to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Ramada Inn Rockville, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Lalita D. Palekar, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8066, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, 301-496-7575.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology

[[Page 21000]]

Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research 
Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)
    Dated: April 11, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
 Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-9720 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Lewis *et al. v.*Iba.

*(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.*

June 2, 1890.)

Practice in Civil Cases—Dismissal.

Where the testimony warrants a finding in favor of one of several plaintiffs, a motion to dismiss the entire case is properly denied.

Appeal from fourth district court.

Action by Samuel Lewis and others against Casper Iba for work done. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

Argued before Larremore, C. J., and Allen and Bookstaver, JJ.

*If. C. Botty,*for appellant. *M. K. Gottlieb,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

We have carefully read the testimony in this case, and find that there was sufficient evidence to justify the justice in rendering a verdict in favor of both plaintiffs, as there is proof that they were jointly interested in the work done, and the receipt given by Lewis was sufficiently explained. Even if it were not so, there certainly was sufficient testimony to warrant the justice in finding in favor of the plaintiff Lewis, and defendant’s motion to dismiss was therefore properly denied, as it was a motion to dismiss the case entirely, and not as to the plaintiff Procha alone. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Kangtai Cactus
Bio-Tech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Jinjiang Wang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March ___, 2011

/s/ Jinjiang
WangJinjiang Wang, Principal Executive Officer

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Alberto DiBella, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: January 31, 2008



/s/ Alberto DiBella
-------------------
Alberto DiBella
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1





                             AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY


                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 26, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Fair, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  March 12, 2003

                                           By:   /s/ William J. Fair
                                           --------------------------------
                                           William J. Fair
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Comstock *et al.,*Appellants, v. Budlong *et al.,*Respondents.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.*

May 2, 1890.)

No opinion. Judgment of the county court of Oneida county, reversing the judgment of the city court of Utica, reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the city court of Utica affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, John C. Corey certify that:(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stoneridge, Inc. (the “Company”); (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(f)and 15d – 15(f)) for the Company and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and(5) The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ John C. Corey John C. Corey, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  November 9, 2007  
37
# Reporting EB-5 Fraud

Common EB-5 fraud schemes can involve anybody, including:
                - The petitioner (the immigrant investor);
                - The applicant and the people, companies, and places associated with the applicant (for example, the regional center principal, sponsor, developer of the new commercial enterprise, and the job-creating entity president, owner, or manager);
                - The attorney or law firm representing the petitioner or regional center; and
                - A migration agent, promoter, or agency in the United States or abroad.

## How to Report Suspected EB-5 Fraud and Abuse to USCIS

To report general immigration benefit fraud and abuse, use our new online tip form.

## Reporting Suspected EB-5 Fraud and Abuse Through Other Agencies

                - A joint U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and USCIS  Investor Alert  provides information about fraudulent investment scams that exploit the Immigrant Investor Program.  Report securities fraud  in the EB-5 program to the SEC.
                - Individuals across the world can report suspicious criminal activity to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI)  Tip Form  24 hours a day, seven days a week. Highly trained specialists take reports from both the public and law enforcement agencies on more than 400 laws enforced by ICE HSI. Visit the  ICE Tip Line  page for more information.

If you are the victim of an immigration services scam, visit the Report Immigration Scams page for more information.

03/13/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### Alexander ZAMORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC., a California corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-14174

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 26, 2011.

William Robert Amlong, Jennifer Daley, Amlong & Amlong, PA, Fort Lauderdale, FL, James R. Wiley, Carlton Fields, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kristy M. Johnson, Carlton Fields, PA, Miami, FL, Mark T. Kobata, Barlow Kobata & Denis LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BARKETT, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Zamora appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to his former employer, Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. (‘Williams-Sonoma”), in his action alleging both discrimination and retaliation under: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a) and 2000e-3(a); the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12112(a) and 12203(a); and state law.1 Zamora alleged that, during the course of his employment as an assistant store manager, WilliamsSonoma discriminated against him on the basis of his Cuban national origin and retaliated against him for opposing such discrimination. He also alleged that Williams-Sonoma discriminated against him on the basis of a disability, namely a chronic ankle condition, and retaliated against him for requesting accommodations for this condition. The district court granted Williams-Sonoma summary judgment on the ground that Zamora failed to make out a *prima facie*case for any of his *922claims. We have carefully reviewed the record, as well as the parties’ briefs, and we reach the same conclusion, finding no genuine issues of material fact. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Williams-Sonoma.

AFFIRMED.

1

. "This Court reviews *de novo*summary judgment rulings and draws all inferences and reviews all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Summary judgment is appropriate only if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” *Moton v. Cowart,*631 F.3d 1337, 1341 (11th Cir.2011) (citations omitted).
#### ACOUSTIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ITRON, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-1315.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 6, 2011.

Before LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The parties jointly move to remand this case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Acoustic Technologies, Inc. (ATI) appeals the district court’s judgment that dismissed its complaint without prejudice. The district court held that ATI lacked standing to sue alone for patent infringement because it was only a co-owner of the patent. The parties state that they have now settled the case and requested an indicative ruling from the district court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 62.1, whether the district court would defer, deny, or grant a motion to vacate the underlying judgment if the case were remanded. The district court indicated pursuant to Rule 62.1(a)(3) that it would grant the motion.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings as may be appropriate.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AK-040-00-1410; AA-81911]


Realty Action; Airport Lease, Near Cairn Mountain/Sparrevohn

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Realty Action, Lease of Public Land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Mr. and Mrs. Gary Pogany (Applicants) have submitted an 
application for an airport lease on public land pursuant to the Act of 
May 24, 1928, as amended (49 U.S.C. appendix, 211-213) and regulations 
at 43 CFR part 2911. The leased land would be used to increase the 
safety of people flying into Osprey Lodge, which is owned and operated 
by Mr. and Mrs. Gary Pogany. The description of the land is as follows:

T. 12 N., R. 34 W., Section 16, SE\1/4\,

    Containing approximately 3.4 acres.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Notice of Realty Action proposes to 
lease public land that borders the Applicant's private land to extend 
an existing air strip for safety purposes.
    The applicants have provided a letter of concurrence with the 
proposal from the Federal Aviation Administration.
    The lease will be offered to the Applicants for a term of 20 years. 
Payment of rent to the United States will be required at no less than 
fair market value.

DATES: Interested parties may submit comments on or before June 5, 
2000, to the Field Manager, Anchorage Field Office, 6881 Abbott Loop 
Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99507-2599. In the absence of a timely 
objection, this proposal shall become the final decision of the 
Department of the Interior.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Collie, Anchorage Field Office, 
Bureau of Land Management, 6881 Abbott Loop Road, Anchorage, Alaska 
99507-2599; (907) 267-1244 or (800) 478-1263.

Clinton Hanson,
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-9950 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
FIBERGEN INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                  6,748
<SECURITIES>                                           48,206
<RECEIVABLES>                                           1,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                               30
<INVENTORY>                                               485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       57,293
<PP&E>                                                 11,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                          2,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         71,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,384
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  100
<OTHER-SE>                                             11,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           71,116
<SALES>                                                 5,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        5,276
<CGS>                                                   3,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           3,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        1,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           665
<INCOME-TAX>                                              266
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       399
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      94,590,674
<SECURITIES>                                76,501,537
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,363,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                   250,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           174,727,953
<PP&E>                                      73,770,874
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,462,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             435,190,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,332,335
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,936
<OTHER-SE>                                 424,564,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               435,190,880
<SALES>                                      5,840,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,840,349
<CGS>                                        5,905,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,905,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            39,821,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               105,301
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (35,227,593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (35,227,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (35,227,593)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.93)


</TABLE>