alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.2 This ASSUMPTION TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT is entered into effective
as of January 1, 2003, by and among EQUITY OFFICE MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., a
Delaware limited liability company (EOM); EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST, a
Maryland real estate investment trust (the Trust); EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES
MANAGEMENT CORP., a Delaware corporation (EOPMC); EOP OPERATING LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership (EOP Partnership); and MARSHA C.
WILLIAMS (the Executive). Recitals Reference is made to a certain Change in Control Agreement dated as of
November 22, 2002, by and among Equity Office Properties Management Corp., a
Delaware corporation, the Trust and Executive (the Change In Control
Agreement). Statement of Agreement For value received, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby enter into this Assumption to Change
in Control Agreement providing as follows: 1. EOM, being the current employer of Executive, does hereby expressly
assume, from and after January 1, 2003 all obligations of EOPMC as Employer,
set forth in the Change in Control Agreement, as if it were named therein as
the Employer for the period from and after such date. In consideration for
such assumption, EOPMC is hereby released from any and all future liability
under or pursuant to the Change in Control 1




---



##### 



Agreement, except for its obligations as guarantor in accordance with the
terms of the Change in Control Agreement, which obligations are hereby
confirmed. 2. Executive hereby consents to the foregoing. EQUITY OFFICE MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.By:
    /s/ Stanley M. StevensName:
    Stanley M. StevensTitle:
    Executive Vice PresidentEQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUSTBy:
    /s/ Stanley M. StevensName:
    Stanley M. StevensTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Counsel and SecretaryEOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBy:
    Equity Office Properties Trust, its general partnerBy:
    /s/ Stanley M. StevensName:
    Stanley M. StevensTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Counsel and SecretaryEQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT CORP.By:
    /s/ Stanley M. StevensName:
    Stanley M. StevensIts:
    Vice President and Secretary/s/ Marsha C. WilliamsMarsha C. Williams(Executive) 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of an expiring information collection. OPM-1386B, Applicant Race and National Origin Questionnaire, is used to gather information concerning the race and national origin of applicants for employment under the Outstanding Scholar provision of the Luevano Consent Decree, 93 F.R.D. 68 (1981).

Approximately 100,000 OPM-1386B forms are completed annually. Each form takes approximately 8 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 13,333 hours.

Comments are particularly invited on: whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management and whether it will have practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is accurate and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, or e-mail to                         *mbtoomey@opm.gov*

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received on or before June 25, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—Suzy M. Barker, Director, Staffing Policy Division, Employment Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 6500, Washington, DC 20415.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Steven R. Cohen,

Acting Director.

[FR Doc. 01-10114 Filed 4-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-01-U
Order entered April 11, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01072
- CR THOMAS PAUL GILBERT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219
- 80015
- 2018



### O RDER
Appellant’s brief was initially due January 27, 2019. Appellant subsequently filed two motions for extensions of time which we granted, making his brief due March 2 8, 2019. To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed, and appellant has had no communication with the Court regarding the brief or the appeal. Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s
brief has not been filed . In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal or whether appellant has abandoned the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’sabsence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per

curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation , which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this C ourt within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Jennifer Edgeworth , Presiding Judge, 2 19 th Judicial District Court ; Mitchell Nolte ; and to the Collin County District Attorney

. T h is appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier

.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### Spero *v.*West Side Bank.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

June 6, 1890.)

Discovert—Examination of Party before Trial.

Plaintiff’s motion to vacate an order for his examination before trial is properlj denied where it appears from the affidavit that it is defendant’s intention to use Eiaintiff’s testimony on the trial, and that the knowledge of the facts established y the evidence are peculiarly possessed by plaintiff, and cannot be obtained bj defendant in any other way.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by David Spero against the West Side Bank. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate order for his examination before trial. For report on former appeal, see 7 if. Y. Supp. 546.

Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Brady and Daniels, JJ.

*W, F. Severance,*for appellant. *Gibson Putzel,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Although the affidavit upon which the order for the examination of the plaintiff was granted does not contain in as direct terms as might be advisable all the allegations required in most of the cases to sustain an order for the examination, sufficient appears to show that it is the intention of the defendant to use the evidence of the plaintiff upon the trial, and that the knowledge of the facts established by the evidence of the plaintiff is peculiarly possessed by the plaintiff, and the defendant cannot obtain them in any other way. The order should be affirmed, with costs to abide the event.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 08-20

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND PRACTICE

O R D E R

Pursuant to Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules), the Court 

created a Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel) to consider disciplinary 

cases coming before the Court. The Court's March 11, 2011 Resolution regarding the Standing 

Panel provides that "the Clerk shall designate as the next member of the Standing Panel the 

regular active judge with highest precedence among judges who have not yet been designated as 

a member of the Standing Panel, or ... the regular active judge with the longest period of time 

since last service as a regular member of the Standing Panel." 

Judge Toth is the regular active judge with highest precedence among judges who have 

not yet been designated as a member of the Standing Panel. Accordingly, the current standing 

panel, comprised of Judges Bartley, Allen, and Meredith will be reconstituted effective April 8, 

2020, to comprise Judges Allen, Meredith, and Toth. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that effective April 8, 2020, the Standing Panel consists of Judges Allen, 

Meredith, and Toth. 

Dated: April 8, 2020 FOR THE COURT:

/s/Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Ceragon Networks Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A
(Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of our knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By:   /s/ Ira Palti
Name: Ira PaltiTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

|By:  /s/ Naftali Idan
Name: Naftali IdanTitle: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date: July 27, 2006

A signed copy of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ceragon Networks Ltd. and will be
retained by Ceragon Networks Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



---

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Dr. Stephen A. Levine, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Allergy Research Group, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

         The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2004, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the
"Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
this 13th day of May 2004.



                                            /s/ Stephen A. Levine
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Dr. Stephen A. Levine, Ph.D.
                                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
                                            FINANCIAL OFFICER
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

 

I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer ofIWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Registrant”), does hereby certify in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of theRegistrant, to which this certificate is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m), as amended; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| September 23,  2004 | /s/ Henry J.  Boucher, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                     | Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
GEOR GE MASON, III , Appel lant,

v. Case No. 5D 23

- 2184 LT Case No. 2014

- CF

- 1379 STATE OF FLORIDA , Appel lee. / Opinion filed July 25, 2023
3. 850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, St ephen E. Toner, Jr. , Judge.
Geor ge Mason, III , Indiantown , pro se.
N o Appearanc e for

Appel lee

.

PER CURIAM

. A FFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

E DWARDS, C.J., WALLIS and MACIVER , JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of IWTTesoro Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification shall not bedeemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expresslyincorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated:  May 6, 2005 | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                     | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.     |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by 18 U.S.C Section 1350 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 03-18

IN RE: COMMITTEE ON ADMISSIONS AND PRACTICE

O R D E R

It is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 2(a)(1) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice 

(Rules), that Theodore C. Jarvi, Esq., is appointed as Chairman of the Committee on Admission 

and Practice for a term expiring on November 19, 2020, replacing as Chairman Kenneth A. 

Walsh, Esq., whose term expired on November 19, 2017, and was extended under Rule 2(a)(3) 

until a successor was appointed.

DATED: April 2, 2018 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted  from the
registrant's unaudited financial statements as of September 30, 1997 and for the
nine months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              78
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,214
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           402
<OTHER-SE>                                       (110)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,292
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 04-09

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), and in order to meet the needs of the Court, recalleligible retired judge John J. Farley, III, isrecalled to perform substantial service to the Court. Judge

Farley will be recalled on April 3, 2009, for a period of one day.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective April 3, 2009, John J. Farley, III, shall commence service as a

judge of the Court. 

DATED: April 2, 2009 FOR THE COURT:

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
# Constitution Week and Citizenship Day Toolkit

This page features ready-to-use downloadable animated graphics for Citizenship Day, Constitution Day and Constitution Week. We have provided three options and all are sized appropriately for each social media platform to include Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Stories.

 Version 1:
                - Twitter 1600x900 (MP4, 2.81 MB)
                - Facebook 1200x630 (MP4, 2.77 MB)
                - Instagram 1080x1080 (MP4, 3.84 MB)
                - Story 1080x1920 (MP4, 5.43 MB)
                - LinkedIn 1200x627 (MP4, 2.61 MB)

Version 2:
                - Twitter 1600x900 (MP4, 2.83 MB)
                - Facebook 1200x630 (MP4, 2.8 MB)
                - Instagram 1080x1080 (MP4, 3.87 MB)
                - Story 1080x1920 (MP4, 3.87 MB)
                - LinkedIn 1200x627 (MP4, 2.59 MB)

 Version 3:
                - Twitter 1600x900 (MP4, 2.64 MB)
                - Facebook 1200x630 (MP4, 2.7 MB)
                - Instagram 1080x1080 (MP4, 3.72 MB)
                - Story 1080x1920 (MP4, 5.3 MB)
                - LinkedIn 1200x627 (MP4, 2.5 MB)

09/15/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,285
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,983)
<INVENTORY>                                     48,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,990
<PP&E>                                          84,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                (35,404)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,351
<BONDS>                                        294,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     32,112
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                         309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   372,594
<SALES>                                        187,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,960
<CGS>                                          119,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,222
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,091)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,283)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### McGUIRE v. ANLETA et al.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 16, 1894.)

Action by Mary A. McGuire, as executrix, against Agnesa Anleta and others.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

T. J. McKee, for plaintiff.

F. J. Moissen, for defendants.

No opinion. Taxation affirmed. The cases referred to are not applicable to an action for partition.