alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 14-11

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGE

O R D E R

WHEREAS the Court has been receiving a significant number of Notices of Appeal every

month, as well as numerous motions and other filings, and 

WHEREAS appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court deserve timelyjudicial review

and decision, and 

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1) may recall

Senior Judges of the Court who have retired but who have agreed to be available for such recall

when their service is needed by the Court, and 

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court has determined that the service of a Senior Judge

is needed by the Court and, if recalled, that Senior Judge would perform judicial duties and provide

substantial service to the Court, and 

WHEREAS Senior Judge John J. Farley, III, has consented to be available for recall as

needed by the Court,

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that, effective September 6, 2011, Judge John J. Farley, III, is recalled from

retired status to have and to exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in

active service and to otherwise perform substantial service with the Court as requested by the Chief

Judge. Judge Farley shall serve until the Chief Judge of the Court determines that his service is no

longer needed or for a period of time not to exceed 90 days, whichever is sooner, unless extended

by the Chief Judge with the consent of Judge Farley.

DATED: September 6, 2011 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance
Company  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Stuart J. Boesky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


    (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:  /s/ Stuart J. Boesky
     --------------------
     Stuart J. Boesky
     Chief Executive Officer
     August 14, 2003


                                       39
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 2-99

IN RE:

LIMITED APPEARANCES

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY,

HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges

O R D E R

This Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, as changed effective May 1, 1999, permit a

limited appearance by a practitioner only for the purpose of filing a Notice of Appeal. It is

ORDERED that, notwithstanding the foregoing restriction, a staff attorney of a pro bono

representation program operating under a grant or contract made in connection with the authority

first provided in Public Law No. 102-229 may enter a limited appearance for the purpose of case

screening and referral.

DATED: March 18, 1999 BY THE COURT:

FRANK Q. NEBEKER

Chief Judge
#### Victor Manuel ROSALES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-72563.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 18, 2011.

Filed March 25, 2011.

Zachary Miller Nightingale, Avantika Shastri, Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

John Blakeley, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kiley L. Kane, Esquire, Kathryn McKinney, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Victor Rosales (“Rosales”) petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

We review ineffective assistance of counsel claims de novo and findings of fact regarding counsel’s performance for substantial evidence. *Lin v. Ashcroft,*377 F.3d 1014, 1024 (9th Cir.2004). Ineffective assistance of counsel claims require a showing of prejudice to succeed. *Id.*Upon review of the record, we conclude that the BIA did not err in determining that Rosales did not demonstrate prejudice arising out of his prior counsel’s failure to properly investigate and present additional testimony and documentary evidence. Evidence that it was difficult for Rosales to maintain his anonymity in one Guatemalan town, Salama, does not undermine the agency’s previous conclusion that Rosales could reasonably relocate within Guatemala.

The petition for review is DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001043476
<NAME>                        OAO TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           13,286
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    29,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (1,030)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 53,176
<PP&E>                                            4,973 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   65,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23,301
<BONDS>                                              48 <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            185
<OTHER-SE>                                       42,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     65,957
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                114,914
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    96,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 16,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,004 <F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .09


<FN>
(F1) Shown in this Financial Data Schedule net of related accumulated
     depreciation for consistency with Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(F2) Represents the long-term portion of capital lease obligations.
(F3) Represents interest and other income of the Company.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Media Contacts

USCIS has spokespersons in Washington, D.C. and throughout the country to respond to media inquiries.

Please note, the numbers listed below are for members of the media only. Spokespersons **do not have access to applicants’ case-specific information.** For general public queries, case status, or other applicants’ case-specific information, please use USCIS’s online resources or call the USCIS Contact Center at 800-375-5283.

## National Issues

**Headquarters Press Office:**media@uscis.dhs.gov**.**Please include your name, media outlet, phone number, deadline, and detailed request.After business hours (EST) please contact: media@uscis.dhs.gov.

Immigration enforcement, detention and removal of noncitizens, border enforcement, and criminal investigations are handled by other DHS agencies. Visas are issued by the U.S. Department of State.

04/03/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mrs. Fields' Original Cookies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Stephen Russo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Sandra M. Buffa, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/STEPHEN RUSSOStephen Russo
Chief Executive Officer
November 7, 2003     |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/SANDRA M. BUFFASandra M. Buffa
Chief Financial Officer
November 7, 2003 |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



QuickLinks
# Austria - USCIS Vienna Field Office

#### Archived Content

The information on this page is out of date. However, some of the content may still be useful, so we have archived the page.

**USCIS Closed its Office in Vienna on December 31The last day the office was open to the public was November 30**

USCIS permanently closed its field office in Vienna, Austria, on Dec. 31, 2015. This office is no longer open to the public. The USCIS field offices in Frankfurt, Rome and Athens will assume Vienna’s former jurisdiction, which includes Austria, Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Kosovo, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The U.S. Embassy in Vienna will assume responsibility for certain limited services previously provided by USCIS to individuals residing in Austria.

The new jurisdictional breakdown for countries in USCIS Vienna’s former jurisdiction will be as follows:

Beginning on Dec. 1, 2015, individuals who live in Austria, Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, or Slovenia must follow these filing instructions:

Effective immediately, if you live in USCIS Vienna’s jurisdiction you must follow these instructions if you need to request a boarding foil because your Permanent Resident Card has been lost or stolen:

General information about the U.S. Embassy in Vienna is available on the Embassy website. You may also contact the Embassy by calling 011 (43-1) 31339-0 or by mailing:

American Embassy AustriaBoltzmanngasse 161090 ViennaAustria

For more information on the services USCIS provides, please contact the appropriate USCIS field office in Frankfurt, Rome or Athens, according to the jurisdictional assignments noted in the chart above.

You can find contact information for USCIS Frankfurt, USCIS Rome and USCIS Athens on the USCIS website.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, visit www.uscis.gov.

06/27/2016

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (in thousands) EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          77,524 
<SECURITIES>                                    25,351 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,276 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,276 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,368 
<PP&E>                                         136,895 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,624 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 360,997 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,362 
<BONDS>                                        383,370 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                     14,442 
<COMMON>                                           208 
<OTHER-SE>                                    (126,384)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   360,997 
<SALES>                                         62,619 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,619 
<CGS>                                           44,370 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,370 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,425 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,190 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,889 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,499)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24,499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                         0 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.17)
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus JUAREZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40971

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Juarez-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Juarez-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1584** 

ANTOINETTE H. POSEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. SGT. TODD J. MCGHEE; SGT. PATRICK MERRITT, JR.; CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00573

- WO

- PTS )

Submitted : August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Antoinette H. Posey, Appellant Pro Se. William L. Hill, FRAZIER HILL & FURY, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antoinette H. Posey appeals the district court ’ s order

a dopting the reasoning of the magistrate judge and denying relief on h er 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Posey v. McGhee , NO. 1:11

- cv - 00573

- WO

- PTS (M.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Terrorism-Related Inadmissibility Grounds Exemptions

The secretaries of State and Homeland Security, in consultation with the attorney general, can authorize exemptions from the terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG). See INA section 212(d)(3)(B).

Please see below for more information on each of these exemptions approved to date.

Situational Exemptions to Date: 
                - Material support under duress
                - Solicitation under duress
                - Military-type training under duress
                - Voluntary medical care
                - Certain applicants with existing immigration benefits
                - Iraqi uprisings
                - Certain limited material support
                - Insignificant material support
                - Afghan Allies
                - Afghan Civil Servants

Group-Based Exemptions to Date:
                - 10 named organizations in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008 (CAA)
                - All Burma Students’ Democratic Front (ABSDF)
                - All India Sikh Students Federation-Bittu Faction (AISSF-Bittu)
                - Certain Burmese groups
                - Democratic Movement for the Liberation of the Eritrean Kunama (DMLEK)
                - Eritrean Liberation Front (ELF)
                - Ethiopia People's Revolutionary Party (EPRP)
                - Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN)
                - Iraqi National Congress (INC), Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP) and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)
                - Kataeb militias
                - Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA)
                - Lebanese Forces
                - Nationalist Republican Alliance (ARENA)
                - Oromo Liberation Front (OLF)
                - Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF)

07/13/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
# Filing Form I-765 with Other Forms

You can file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization with other forms. This is called concurrent filing. In other instances, you may need to wait to file Form I-765. For example, you would need to wait 150 days after filing for asylum if your asylum application remains pending.  Always thoroughly read the instructions related to the benefit for which you are applying to determine whether you may need to wait before you can file for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD).

If you are filing Form I-765 with another form, file both forms (with all the required filing fees and supporting documents) at the location specified by the other form (see below). For example, if you are filing Form I-765 together with Form I-539, Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, file both forms according to the Form I-539 instructions. You can find the filing fee for Form I-765 by visiting our Fee Schedule page.

**Who May File Form I-765 With Other Forms**

You cannot concurrently file Form I-765 with all USCIS forms. Please consult each form’s instructions to determine if you can file a Form I-765 with that form. We will update this page whenever we change the forms with which you may also file Form I-765. 

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Planet Green Holdings
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2018 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

|Date: April 15, 2019 | By: /s/ Yu Li                               
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                     | Yu Li, Chief Financial Officer              
|                     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**EXHIBIT
      10.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Registration No. 333-117054; No. 333-100804 and No. 333-54632) of our
      report dated June 30, 2008, 2008 relating to the 2007 consolidated financial
      statements of MIND C.T.I. Ltd., which appear in this Form 20-F.





Tel-Aviv,
                Israel
            /s/Kesselman
                & KesselmanJune
                30, 2008
            Certified
                Public Accountants (Isr.)