alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Bradley J. Gregory, Sr. certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8618 and 34-52492]c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 13, 2007      /s/ Bradley J. Gregory, Sr.   Bradley J. Gregory, Sr.   Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

MISC. NO. 02-24 

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

 Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled by 

the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William A. Moorman, 

having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. The Chief 

Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Moorman would provide substantial service 

necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

 Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

 ORDERED that, effective January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024, recall-eligible retired 

Judge Moorman is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). Judge 

Moorman shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active 

service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the Chief Judge. 

It is further 

 ORDERED that Judge Moorman shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2024 to review 

and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other substantial service 

at the request of the Chief Judge and he shall so serve throughout the calendar year for up to 90 days 

or its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Moorman's service may be extended beyond 90 days. 

 

DATED: January 3, 2024 BY THE COURT: 

MARGARET BARTLEY 

 Chief Judge
#### MARTIN et al. v. FREED.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

May 14, 1894.)

Action by George W. Martin and others against Samuel C. Freed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and CULLEN, JJ.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs on opinion of Dykman, J., in Pitt v. Freed, 28 N. Y. Supp. 863.
Exhibit 13.2
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 RULE13a-14(b)/RULE15d-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of Compugen Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Dikla Czaczkes Axselbrad
 
 Title:           Chief Financial Officer
 Date:           March 11, 2010
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 02-19

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), eligible retired Judges of the Court may be recalled 

by the Chief Judge when further service is needed by the Court. Retired Judge William A. 

Moorman, having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recall-eligible retired Judge. 

The Chief Judge of the Court has determined that, if recalled, Judge Moorman would provide 

substantial service necessary to meet the needs of the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective January 9, 2019, through December 31, 2019, recall-eligible 

retired Judge Moorman is recalled from retired status in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). 

Judge Moorman shall have and exercise all the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge 

in active service and shall otherwise perform substantial service for the Court as requested by the 

Chief Judge. It is further

ORDERED that Judge Moorman shall serve in recalled status in calendar year 2019 to 

review and decide appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court and to perform other 

substantial service at the request of the Chief Judge and he shall so serve throughout the calendar 

year for up to 90 days or its equivalent. With his consent, Judge Moorman's service may be 

extended beyond 90 days. 

DATED: January 9, 2019 BY THE COURT:

ROBERT N. DAVIS

Chief Judge
# Interrupciones de las Herramientas en Línea

04/02/2024

USCIS llevará a cabo labores de mantenimiento del sistema electrónico (CRIS) comenzando el miércoles, 3 de abril a las 11:50 p.m. y terminará el jueves, 4 de abril a las 2:00 a.m. (hora del este).

Durante ese tiempo usted podría experimentar dificultades técnicas con una o más herramientas en línea:
                  - Estatus de mi caso
                  - Consulta en línea (E-request)
                  - Cambio de dirección en línea
                  - Tiempos de procesamiento
                  - Localizador de médicos
                  - Localizador de oficinas
                  - Presentar en Línea
                  - Mi cuenta en línea de my USCIS
                  - Service Request Management Tool (SRMT)

Disculpe los inconvenientes que esto pueda causarle.

04/02/2024

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G.
LaPerch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  May
      11, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      William G. LaPerchWilliam
      G. LaPerch
                Chief
      Executive Officer
#### Lawrence H. Grynberg, Appellant, v Alexander’s, Inc., Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated March 21, 1986, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff was fired as a temporary at-will employee of the defendant for failing a polygraph test. Although unable to sue to recover damages for wrongful discharge as an at-will employee *(see, Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293), the plaintiff nevertheless seeks to recover damages *668for injury to his reputation and career prospects on a defamation theory. His complaint was properly dismissed inasmuch as it wholly failed to comply with the specificity requirements for pleading a cause of action sounding in defamation (CPLR 3016 [a]). Specifically, the complaint failed to allege the particular words complained of or to provide the time, place and manner of the purported defamatory statement *(see, Buffolino v Long Is. Sav. Bank,*126 AD2d 508, 510; *Geddes v Princess Props. Intl.,*88 AD2d 835). Nor was there any evidence that an allegedly defamatory statement was disseminated to any prospective employers. Insofar as the reason for the plaintiff’s discharge was only communicated between certain of the defendant’s employees, and there were no allegations that the privileged content of the communication was the product of actual malice on the part of the defendant’s employees, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for defamation *(see, Buffolino v Long Is. Sav. Bank, supra,*at 511). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.
AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY

                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Fair, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  June 15, 2005

                                        By:   /s/ William J. Fair
                                        -------------------------
                                        William J. Fair
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)
tmng-ex101to8k_9413880.htm


    
      


      The
Management Network Group, Inc.

      2010 Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan

      


      The
following is a description of the executive incentive compensation plan for
fiscal year 2010 adopted by the independent members of the Board of Directors of
The Management Network Group, Inc.:

      


      The
amount, if any, of the bonus pool for fiscal year 2010 (the "Payout Amount")
will be determined as follows:

      


      
        	
                2010 Non-GAAP EBITDA (Post-Bonus)
      Exceeds1

              	 
      	
                Payout Amount

              
	
                $2,750,000

              	 
      	
                $450,000

              
	
                $3,025,000

              	 
      	
                $575,000

              
	
                $3,300,000

              	 
      	
                $700,000

              
	
                $3,630,000

              	 
      	
                $770,000

              
	
                $3,970,000

              	 
      	
                $830,000

              
	
                $4,310,000

              	 
      	
                $890,000

              
	 
      	 
      	
                Payout
      Amount is capped at $890,000

              


      

      


       

      Eligible
Participants: Principal executive officer, president and chief operating
officer, and principal financial officer.

      


      The
distribution of the Payout Amount, if any, among the Eligible Participants will
be determined by the Compensation Committee and/or independent
directors.

      

        

      

       

        1 Non-GAAP EBITDA excludes non-cash
charges and extraordinary one-time items approved by the Compensation
Committee.
GreenPower Motor Company Inc.: Exhibit 10.32 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

    	
                 

            	
                (1)

            	
                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            


    

    	
                 

            	
                (2)

            	
                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

            


    

    	
                 

            
	
                /s/ Fraser Atkinson          

                Fraser Atkinson

            
	
                Chief Executive Officer

            
	
                (Principal Executive Officer)

                June 29, 2021
# Preventing Discrimination

Federal law prohibits employers from discriminating against people based on several factors, including their citizenship or immigration status, or their national origin.  These protections apply during the hiring, firing, recruiting, Form I-9, or E-Verify processes. Employers with 15 or more workers also are prohibited from discriminating against applicants or employees in any term, condition, or privilege of employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or gender identity), age, disability, or genetic information. 

Employers cannot discriminate when: 
                - Hiring a new employee; 
                - Verifying an employee’s authorization to work on the Form I-9;  
                - Electronically confirming identity and employment authorization with E-Verify, including in the E-Verify tentative nonconfirmation (mismatch) process; or
                - Terminating a person’s employment. 

Employers also cannot retaliate against a person who: 
                - Files a charge of discrimination with the  Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER)  or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC); 
                - Participates in an investigation or prosecution of a discrimination complaint; or
                - Asserts their rights or the rights of others under anti-discrimination laws. 

IER investigates charges of employment discrimination related to an individual’s citizenship or immigration status, or national origin under a part of the Immigration and Nationality Act, found at 8 U.S.C. section 1324b. The EEOC also investigates employment discrimination based on national origin, in addition to other protected bases under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. IER generally investigates national origin claims against employers with four to 14 employees, and EEOC investigates national origin claims against employers with 15 or more employees. 

The federal government may penalize employers who discriminate against employees.

                    - Handbook for Employers M-274, Guidance for Completing Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification Form
                    - Take a Free Webinar

03/08/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paladyne Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford A. Clark,
VP of Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Clifford A. Clark
---------------------
Clifford A. Clark
Chief Financial Officer
January 21, 2003
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 08-12

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

O R D E R

Pursuant to Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules), the Court

created a Standing Panel on Admission and Discipline (Standing Panel). The Standing Panel 

considers accusations, made pursuant to Rule 6(c), of professional misconduct by practitioners at the

Court. The Court's March 11, 2011, Resolution, regarding the Standing Panel provides that on

"[e]ach August 1, the longest serving member of the Standing Panel will be removed automatically

from the Standing Panel with regard to any new cases assigned to the Standing Panel." It further

provides that ". . . the Clerk shall designate as the next member of the Standing Panel the regular

active judge with highest precedence among judges who have not yet been designated as a member

of the Standing Panel . . .". Judge Schoelen is currently the longest serving member. Accordingly,

the current Standing Panel, comprised of Judges Hagel, Moorman, and Schoelen, will be

reconstituted effective August 1, 2012, to comprise Judges Hagel, Moorman, and Pietsch.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective August 1, 2012, the Standing Panel will consist of Judges Hagel,

Moorman, and Pietsch.

DATED: August 9, 2012 FOR THE COURT:

/s/Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
NO. 07-09-0115-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	NOVEMBER 25, 2009

	______________________________

	JAMES WARREN BRIGHT, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 16,336; HONORABLE KELLY G. MOORE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	ON MOTION TO DISMISS

	Pending before this court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal of his underlying case brought under Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. articles 64.01-64.05 (Vernon 2006 & Supp. 2009).  Appellant, appearing pro se, signed the motion.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							James T. Campbell

						                  Justice

Do not publish.
Exhibit 31.01
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing operator ofThe Campbell Fund Trust (the “Trust”), certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
E 2

 

 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland    Bruce L. Cleland Chief Executive Officer May 13, 2005
E 3