alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 27, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01520-CV

JOHNNY WIMBREY, WIMBREY GLOBAL INC., WIMBREY TRAINING SYSTEM, 

WIMBREY WORLDWIDE MINISTRIES, ROYAL SUCCESS CLUB LLC, AND 

ROYAL LIFE, Appellants

V.

WORLDVENTURES MARKETING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-06212-2019

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ January 24, 2020 unopposed second motion for extension

of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants’ brief due by 

February 18, 2020.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-107519) of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. of our report dated May
      11,
      2005, except as to Note 18, which is as of June 13, 2005, relating
      to the consolidated financial statements of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. and the
      financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.








/s/
      Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP








**Burr,
      Pilger & Mayer LLP**


**San
      Francisco, California**


**June
      28, 2005**
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Rotterman, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 912]

Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Kenneth F. Case, J.), entered June 3, 2011. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court complied with the statutory mandate to set forth “the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determination! is] based” (§ 168-n [3]; *see People v Carter,*35 AD3d 1023, 1023-1024 [2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 810 [2007]). We reject defendant’s further contention that the People failed to present clear and *1468convincing evidence to support the assessment of 30 points against him for being armed with a dangerous instrument during the commission of one of the underlying crimes. That assessment is supported by the reliable hearsay contained in the case summary and the presentence report (see *People v Thompson,*66 AD3d 1455, 1456 [2009], *lv denied*13 NY3d 714 [2009]; *see generally People v Mingo,*12 NY3d 563, 573 [2009]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that a downward departure from his presumptive risk level was warranted (see *People v Quinones,*91 AD3d 1302, 1303 [2012]). Finally, we reject defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at the SORA hearing (see *People v Bowles,*89 AD3d 171, 181 [2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 807 [2012]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Sconiers, JJ.
#### PEOPLE v. ST. NICHOLAS BANK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1896.)

Proceeding against the St. Nicholas Bank.

No opinion. Motion granted. See 38 N. Y. Supp. 379.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb $)tateg ([ourtof**~peaIg** 

# fortbejfeberaI ([ircuit
HARRY BURNETT, Petitioner, 

### v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

2012-3102 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0432110400-I-1. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER The Department ofJustice moves without opposition for a 13-day extension of time, until October 30, 2012, to file its brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-3102 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2012HARRYBURNETTv.DOJ The motion is granted.

s27 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2 Case: 12-3102 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 10/23/2012
#### Ira Housman et al., Respondents, v Vinicio Curzio, Also Known as Vincent Curzio, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 10, 1985, as upon reargument, adhered to its original determination denying the defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Stolarik in his memorandum decision of January 22, 1985 at the Supreme Court, Rockland County. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
# Minor Eligibility Attestation

                -       English    
                -  Kreyòl Ayisyen 

As a prospective parolee, DHS wants to ensure you are aware of the eligibility requirements for children under the age of 18.

Children who are under the age of 18 may only be eligible for parole if they are traveling to the United States with and in the care and custody of their parent or legal guardian. Parents or legal guardians traveling with a minor child should be prepared to provide documentation of their relationship to the child upon arrival to the United States. If this proof is not available, for the protection and welfare of the child, U.S. law may require that the child be placed in the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Generally, evidence of legal guardianship requires that a legal or administrative process involving the courts or other recognized government entity take place (i.e., a power of attorney or written and/or notarized statement is not a formally recognized arrangement).

Please complete the below attestation to certify your understanding of the family relationship requirement for children requesting parole.
                - I understand that only minors (under the age of 18) traveling with and in the care and custody of a parent or legal guardian are eligible for parole.
                - If I travel with a child of whom I am the parent or legal guardian, I am able to provide documentation as evidence of my parental relationship or legal guardianship of the child. Evidence may include a birth certificate for the child, and identity documents for the parent or legal guardian. Generally, evidence of legal guardianship requires that a legal or administrative process involving the courts or other recognized government entity take place (i.e., a power of attorney or written and/or notarized statement is not a formally recognized arrangement). 
                - If I travel with a child of whom I am not the parent or legal guardian, then it is possible that upon arrival at the United States Port of Entry, the child will be referred to the Department of Health and Human Services as an unaccompanied child.

10/18/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Engine Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Carroll Shelby, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: February 17, 2004           /s/ Carroll Shelby
                                Carroll Shelby, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,395,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,387,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,846
<INVENTORY>                                  1,516,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,078,396
<PP&E>                                      32,781,321
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,274,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,880,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,616,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,403
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,214,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,880,905
<SALES>                                     20,458,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,777,002
<CGS>                                       15,515,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,171,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,846
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (322,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (322,970)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (322,970)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 2708

_____________________________ K. C

. H ., a c hild , Appellant,

v.
S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Steven Fahlgren , Judge

. March 21, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J. , and R AY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.
Ashley B

. Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.
# Field Operations Directorate

## Leadership

Michael Valverde is the associate director of the Field Operations Directorate.

The Field Operations Directorate:
                    - Ensures the integrity of the immigration system by making decisions on immigration benefit applications, petitions and requests, including naturalization and citizenship applications, through written correspondence and in-person interviews with applicants, petitioners, and beneficiaries;
                    - Conducts site visits to verify compliance with terms of admission and detect and disrupt fraud;
                    - Participates collaboratively with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies;
                    - Conducts background security checks for pending applications and petitions;
                    - Conducts more than 10,000 naturalization ceremonies per year nationwide; and
                    - Provides in-person information and documentary services for applicants.

The Field Operations Directorate includes:
                    - 88 field offices that deliver immigration benefit services directly to applicants and petitioners in communities across the United States and its territories.
                    - The National Benefits Center (NBC), which performs centralized front-end processing of applications and petitions that require field office interviews (primarily family-based I-485s and N-400s). In addition, the NBC adjudicates some form types to completion including I‐765s, I-131s, immigration benefits associated with the LIFE Act, legalization-related applications, and international adoption cases.
                    - The Immigrant Investor Program, which adjudicates applications and petitions seeking benefits under the fifth preference employment category, or EB-5. Congress created the EB‐5 category in 1990 to stimulate the U.S. economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors.
                    - A headquarters office, four regional offices and 16 district offices that provide oversight, direction and support to the field offices, field support offices and the NBC.

06/10/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No

. 2 0

- 1018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Appellee ,

v. VALENTIN DELO PEREZ SOTO, a/k/a Miguel Martinez, a/k/a Miguelin Valentine Sanchez, a/k/a Harold Gutierrez ,

a/k/a Miguel Angel Sanchez Caraballo,

Defendant , Appell ant

.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on August 16 , 2 0 2 3 , is amended as follows:

On page 3 , line 2

- 3 , replace " Nearly a decade later, in June 2015, " with " In June 2015, "
On page 8, line 10, replace " United States v." with " United States v."
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Alberto DiBella, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 11, 2004


/s/ Alberto DiBella
---------------------------
Alberto DiBella
Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST CUARD

Complainant

vs.

CHRISTOPHER REALL. JR.

Respondent

Docket Number 2023 -00 17

Enforcement Activity No. 7613346

CONSENT ORDER

Issued: January lE, 2023

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Timothv C. Stueve

Appearances:

LT Natalie Cordes

USCG Sector Southeastern New England

For the Coast Guard

Christopher Reall, Jr., Pro Se

For Respondent
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMf,NT

On or about Janu ary 12,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Seftlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Order to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. S 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated J anuary 18,2023, at

Alameda, California

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard
**Exhibit 12.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Philippe Ozanian, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report of Info Vista S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for theperiod ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”);2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis Report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based onsuch evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date:October 10, 2006 /s/ Philippe Ozanian Name:   Philippe Ozanian    *Title:*    *ChiefFinancial Officer*
Summary Sheet for Executive Cash Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 SUMMARY SHEET FOR EXECUTIVE CASH COMPENSATION 
 The
following table sets forth annual base salaries provided to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and other named executive officers in 2009 and the 2010 base salaries approved by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors (“Committee”) on March 26, 2010. 
  

							
	 Named Executive Officers
	  	2009 Base
Salaries	  	2010 Base
Salaries
	 David S. Haffner, President & Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	900,000	  	$	922,500
	 Matthew C. Flanigan, Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	395,000	  	$	405,000
	 Karl G. Glassman, Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	675,000	  	$	692,000
	 Joseph D. Downes, Jr., Senior Vice President, President – Industrial Materials
	  	$	291,800	  	$	312,100
	 Paul R. Hauser, Senior Vice President, President – Residential Furnishings
	  	$	320,600	  	$	328,600

 The executive
officers will also be eligible to receive a cash award under the Company’s 2009 Key Officers Incentive Plan (filed March 26, 2009 as Appendix B to the Company’s Proxy Statement) in accordance with the 2010 Award Formula (filed
March 31, 2010 as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K). An executive’s cash award is calculated by multiplying his annual salary at the end of the year by a percentage (“Target Percentage”) set by the Committee, then
applying an award formula adopted by the Committee for that year. The Target Percentages applicable to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and other named executive officers are shown in the following table.
Some of the Target Percentages increased in 2010 as reflected below. 
  

					
	 Named Executive Officers
	  	2009 Target
Percentages	 	2010 Target
Percentages
	 David S. Haffner, President & Chief Executive Officer
	  	80%	 	90%
	 Matthew C. Flanigan, Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer
	  	60%	 	65%
	 Karl G. Glassman, Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
	  	70%	 	75%
	 Joseph D. Downes, Jr., Senior Vice President, President – Industrial Materials
	  	50%	 	50%
	 Paul R. Hauser, Senior Vice President, President – Residential Furnishings
	  	50%	 	50%

 Individual
Performance Goals. An executive’s cash award under the Award Formula for 2010 is based, in part, on individual performance goals established outside the 2009 Key Officers Incentive Plan (20% relative weight). The assessment of most of these
individual performance goals is inherently subjective and qualitative. The types of goals for our named executive officers in 2010 include, among other things, strategic planning, talent management/succession planning, new product development,
continuous improvement projects, cost savings initiatives, compliance improvements, sales and operations planning, development of new growth platforms, and various improvements at specific global operations.
#### In re LAUDY. In the matter of Kate Laudy, deceased.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June, 1896.)

No opinion. Application dismissed. The application should be made at special term.
# SAVE CaseCheck

Applying for a benefit or license with a federal, state, or local government agency?

Agencies may need to verify your immigration status to process your application. To verify your status, they use the SAVE Program. CaseCheck, a free and fast service, lets you follow the progress of your SAVE verification case online as often as you like.

Checking your case is easy! Simply click on the CHECK YOUR CASE button below and enter your date of birth (DOB) along with your verification case number, provided by your agency or the number from one of the following immigration documents:
                - Certificate of Citizenship
                - Certificate of Naturalization
                - I-20 Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant Student Status
                - I-94 Arrival/Departure Record
                - I-94 stamp in Unexpired Foreign Passport
                - I-551 Permanent Resident Card
                - I-766 Employment Authorization Document Card
                - I-797 Notice of Action

Check your Case

## Publications

                - SAVE CaseCheck Fact Sheet  (PDF, 86.13 KB)
                - SAVE CaseCheck Brochure (PDF, 136.41 KB)

## Need More Information?

If you need more help, please email SAVE at:

SAVE.help@uscis.dhs.gov 

09/12/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.