20636 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2001 / Notices

deposit rate will be the companyspecific rate established for the most

recent period; (3) for all other PRC

exporters, the cash deposit rate will be

the PRC-wide rate, 201.63 percent; and

(4) for all other non-PRC exporters of the

subject merchandise, the cash deposit

rate will be the rate applicable to the

PRC supplier of that exporter. These

deposit requirements shall remain in

effect until publication of the final

results of the next administrative

review.

This notice serves as a final reminder

to importers of their responsibility

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a

certificate regarding the reimbursement

of antidumping duties prior to

liquidation of the relevant entries

during this review period. Failure to

comply with this requirement could

result in the Secretary’s presumption

that reimbursement of antidumping

duties occurred and subsequent

assessment of double antidumping

duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective order (APO) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with section 351.305(a)(3) of the

Department’s regulations. Timely

written notification of the return/

destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and the terms of an

APO is a sanctionable violation.

This administrative review and these

new shipper reviews and notice are in

accordance with sections 751(a)(1),

751(a)(2)(B) and 771(i)(1) of the Act.

Dated: April 9, 2001.

Timothy J. Hauser,

Acting Under Secretary for International

Trade.

Appendix

List of Issues

1. Use of Spanish Import Data as Surrogate

Value for Live Crawfish

2. Use of Mexican Data as Surrogate Value for

Live Crawfish

3. Use of Spanish Export Data as Surrogate

Value for Live Crawfish

4. Calculation of Byproduct Value based on

India Import Statistics

5. Power and Fuel Expenses as Part of

Surrogate Overhead

6. Use of Annual vs. Monthly Average

Exchange Rates

7. Water as a Separate Cost

8. Fujian Pelagic’s Sales to Pacific Coast:

Export Price vs Constructed Export Price

9. Baolong Biochemical Rescission

10. Use of the Facts on the Record to

Calculate Baolong Biochemical’s Dumping

Margin

11. Yancheng FTC/Ocean Harvest:

Calculation of Packing Material Costs

12. Ningbo/Huaiyin 5: Marine Insurance

13. Huayin 30: Partial Adverse Facts

Available

[FR Doc. 01–10152 Filed 4–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–427–009]

Industrial Nitrocellulose From France:

Notice of Extension of Time Limit for

Preliminary Results of Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit

for preliminary results of antidumping

duty administrative review.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

is extending the time limit for the

preliminary results of the administrative

review of the antidumping duty order

on industrial nitrocellulose from France.

The review covers one manufacturer/

exporter, Bergerac, N.C. The period of

review is August 1, 1999, through July

31, 2000.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 24, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Dirstine, AD/CVD Enforcement,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)

482–4033.

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute are references to

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,

the effective date of the amendments

made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act)

by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.

In addition, unless otherwise indicated,

all citations to the Department of

Commerce’s (the Department’s)

regulations are to 19 CFR Part 351

(1999).

Extension of Time Limits for

Preliminary Results

The Department of Commerce (the

Department) received a request to

conduct an administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on industrial

nitrocellulose from France. On October

2, 2000, the Department initiated this

administrative review covering the

period August 1, 1999, through July 31,

2000. However, due to complexity of the

issues in this case, such as the initiation

of a cost investigation, how U.S. sales

are to be compared to home-market

sales, how difference-in-merchandise

adjustments are calculated, and a

statutorily required verification of

information submitted in the instant

review, it is not practicable to complete

this review within the time limits

mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the

Act. Therefore, in accordance with that

section, the Department is extending the

time limit for the preliminary results

fully to August 31, 2001. The

Department intends to issue the final

results of review 120 days after the

publication of the preliminary results.

This extension of the time limit is in

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of

the Act.

Dated: April 12, 2001.

Louis Apple,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/

CVD Enforcement I.

[FR Doc. 01–10153 Filed 4–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–475–818]

Notice of Amended Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review: Certain Pasta From Italy

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Amendment to final

results of antidumping duty

administrative review in accordance

with decision upon remand: Certain

Pasta from Italy.

SUMMARY: We are amending the cash

deposit and assessment rates for imports

of pasta from Arrighi S.p.A. Industrie

Alimentari (Arrighi) and Barilla

Alimentare, S.p.A. (Barilla) and the

assessment rate for La Molisana

Industrie Alimentari, S.p.A. (La

Molisana) calculated for the January 19,

1996, through June 30, 1997,

administrative review of this order. The

cash deposit rate for La Molisana was

not affected by the litigation. The

revised cash deposit rate for Arrighi is

19.09 percent ad valorem and for Barilla

is 45.49 percent ad valorem.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 24, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James Terpstra, AD/CVD Enforcement,

Office VI, Group II, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2001 / Notices 20637

Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–3965.

The Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the Act), are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act. In addition, unless

otherwise indicated, all citations to the

Department of Commerce’s

(Department’s) regulations are to 19 CFR

Part 351 (1997).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On June 26, 2000, the United States

Court of International Trade (CIT)

remanded to the Department the final

results in the January 19, 1996, through

June 30, 1997, antidumping duty

administrative review of certain pasta

from Italy. See World Finer Foods, Inc.,

et al. v. United States, 886 F. Supp. 23

(CIT 2000) (see also Notice of Final

Results and Partial Rescission of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review; Certain Pasta from Italy, 64 FR

6615 (February 10, 1999)). In its

remand, the CIT instructed the

Department to reconsider the

information provided by World Finer

Foods, Inc., and determine an

appropriate facts available rate for

Arrighi. The CIT further instructed the

Department to consider information

submitted by La Molisana that would

identify the name of the importer of

record for certain U.S. sales transactions

reported by La Molisana and to

recalculate the applicable assessment

rates for La Molisana. With regard to

Barilla, the CIT instructed the

Department to determine a margin that,

although adverse, bears a ‘‘rational

relationship’’ to the current level of

dumping in the industry and provide

corroboration explaining the probative

value of the data used in determining

the adverse facts available margin. On

September 15, 2000, the Department

filed its results of redetermination

pursuant to the CIT’s order. On

November 3, 2000, the CIT affirmed the

final revised remand determination in

World Finer Foods, Inc., et al. v. United

States, 120 F. Supp.2d 1331.

In light of the final and conclusive

court decision in this action, we are

amending the cash deposit rate for

Arrighi from 71.49 percent to 19.09

percent ad valorem and the cash deposit

rate for Barilla from 71.49 percent to

45.49 percent ad valorem. In addition,

we are amending the assessment rates

for merchandise produced by Arrighi

and imported by World Finer Foods,

Inc., and the merchandise produced by

La Molisana and Barilla.

Amended Final Determination

As there is now a final and conclusive

court decision in this action, we are

amending the final results of the

administrative review on certain pasta

from Italy covering the period January

19, 1996, through June 30, 1997,

pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Act.

As a result of this remand

redetermination, the recalculated final

weighted-average margins are as

follows:

Manufacturer/producer Margin

percentage

Arrighi ..................................... 10.09

Barilla ...................................... 45.49

The cash deposit rates for Arrighi of

19.09% ad valorem and for Barilla of

45.49% ad valorem will be effective

upon publication of this notice of

amended final results on all shipments

of the subject merchandise entered, or

withdrawn from warehouse, for

consumption on or after the publication

date. The cash deposit rate for La

Molisana will continue to be based on

the margins found to exist in the most

recently completed review.

Accordingly, the Department will

determine, and the Customs Service will

assess, antidumping duties on all entries

of subject merchandise from Arrighi,

Barilla, and La Molisana during the

period January 19, 1996, through June

30, 1997, in accordance with these

amended final results. For Barilla, this

decision also affects the enjoined entries

for the period July 1, 1998, through June

30, 1999. In accordance with 19 CFR

351.212(b), we have calculated exporter/

importer-specific assessment rates by

aggregating the dumping margins for all

U.S. sales to each importer and dividing

the amount by the total entered value of

the sales to that importer. Where the

importer-specific assessment rate is

above de miminis, we will instruct

Customs to assess antidumping duties

on that importer’s entries of subject

merchandise. We will direct Customs to

assess the resulting percentage margins

against the entered Customs values for

the subject merchandise on each of that

importer’s entries under the order

during the period of review.

These amended final results and

notice are in accordance with sections

751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C.

1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 351.221.

Effective January 20, 2001, Bernard T.

Carreau is fulfilling the duties of the

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

Dated: April 17, 2001.

Bernard T. Carreau,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–10151 Filed 4–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Application for Duty-Free Entry of

Scientific Instrument

Pursuant to section 6(c) of the

Educational, Scientific and Cultural

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part

301), we invite comments on the

question of whether an instrument of

equivalent scientific value, for the

purposes for which the instrument

shown below is intended to be used, is

being manufactured in the United

States.

Comments must comply with 15 CFR

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and

be filed within 20 days with the

Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S.

Department of Commerce, Washington,

DC 20230. Applications may be

examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.

in Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Docket Number: 01–009. Applicant:

University of Virginia, Department of

Psychology, 102 Gilmer Hall, P. O. Box

400400, Charlottesville, VA 22904–

4400. Instrument: Electron Microscope,

Model JEM–1010. Manufacturer: JEOL

Ltd., Japan.

Intended Use: The instrument is

intended to be used for ultrastructural

examination of animal or postmortem

human neural material prepared for

basic neurobiology research and

teaching purposes. In addition, the

instrument will be used in training

graduate and undergraduate students on

ultrastructural approaches in

neurobiology. Application accepted by

Commissioner of Customs: April 2,

2001.

Gerald A. Zerdy,

Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs

Staff.

[FR Doc. 01–10155 Filed 4–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P