alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10.10.3    
    


 Third Amendment to

Coldwater Creek Inc.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  


        1.     Section 3.5
"Adjustments for Form of Benefit" shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


        "An
election under this Section 3.5 for a form of benefit other than a single life annuity may be made at any time before the end of the calendar year prior to the year of the
Participant's Early Retirement Date. After any appropriate reduction is made in a Participant's pension under this Plan for the commencement of payment prior to the Participant's Normal Retirement
Date, appropriate adjustment shall be made in the form of a joint or survivor annuity, if elected. The joint and survivor annuity which may be elected is an annuity payable in monthly installments for
the life of the Participant, to continue after the Participant's death at 50% or 100% of the Participant's benefit to the individual designated Beneficiary for life if that designated Beneficiary
survives the Participant. The last benefit payment under this optional form shall be the payment due on the first day of the month in which occurs the later of the death of the Participant or the
death of the designated Beneficiary. The percentage of the Participant's benefit to be continued and the individual Beneficiary must be irrevocably designated by the Participant prior to the time
benefits commence to the Participant. This form of payment shall be the Actuarial Equivalent of the single life annuity otherwise payable to the Participant, based on the age of the Participant and
the age of the Participant's beneficiary as of the Benefit Commencement Date." 



        2.     In
all respects not amended, the SERP is confirmed and ratified. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed in the SERP. 


*    *    *












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.10.3
# News Releases

All USCIS releases, searchable by topic and date. For material older than three years or that is no longer current, see our Archive section.

Subscribe to get notifications of news releases:

Get Updates by Email
e.g. name@email.com

USCIS Establishes Family Reunification Parole Process for Ecuador

November 15, 2023

DHS to Supplement H-2B Cap with Nearly 65,000 Additional Visas for FY 2024

November 03, 2023

DHS Issues Proposed Rule to Modernize the H-1B Specialty Occupation Worker Program

October 20, 2023

DHS Announces Family Reunification Parole Process for Ecuador

October 18, 2023

Secretary Mayorkas Announces Extension and Redesignation of Cameroon for Temporary Protected Status

October 06, 2023

DHS Previews Federal Register Notice Extending and Separately Redesignating Venezuela for Temporary Protected Status

September 29, 2023

USCIS Awards $22 Million in FY 2023 Citizenship and Integration Grants

September 28, 2023

Secretary Mayorkas Announces Extension and Redesignation of Afghanistan for Temporary Protected Status

September 21, 2023

DHS Issues Proposed Rule to Modernize H-2 Temporary Visa Programs and Strengthen Worker Protections

September 18, 2023

USCIS to Celebrate Constitution Day and Citizenship Day by Welcoming More Than 6,900 New Citizens

September 15, 2023

11 - 20 total rows

- **Back
- Next**

    RSS Feed  

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2508 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to prohibit 

further reductions in sodium levels and to reinstate the grain-rich requirements applicable to the national school lunch and breakfast programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois (for himself and Mr. ASHFORD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to prohibit further reductions in sodium levels and 

to reinstate the grain-rich requirements applicable to the 

national school lunch and breakfast programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy School Meals 

5 Flexibility Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2508 IH

1 SEC. 2. SODIUM TARGET LEVELS; WHOLE GRAIN REQUIRE2 MENT. 

3 Section 9(f) of the Richard B. Russell National 

4 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(f)) is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(5) SODIUM TARGET LEVELS.—Notwith7 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary 

8 shall not implement any regulation under this Act, 

9 the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et 

10 seq.), the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 

11 (Public Law 111–296), or any other law that would 

12 require a reduction in the quantity of sodium con13 tained in federally reimbursed meals, foods, and 

14 snacks sold in schools below Target 1 (as described 

15 in section 220.8(f)(3) of title 7, Code of Federal 

16 Regulations (or successor regulations)). 

17 ‘‘(6) WHOLE GRAIN REQUIREMENT.—Notwith18 standing the final rule of the Secretary entitled ‘Nu19 trition Standards in the National School Lunch and 

20 School Breakfast Programs’ (77 Fed. Reg. 4088 

21 (January 26, 2012)) or any other provision of law— 

22 ‘‘(A) the Secretary shall only require that 

23 half of all grains in federally reimbursed meals, 

24 foods, and snacks sold in schools are whole 

25 grain-rich; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2508 IH

1 ‘‘(B) school food authorities shall comply 

2 with the applicable grain component or stand3 ard with respect to the school lunch or school 

4 breakfast program that was in effect prior to 

5 July 1, 2014.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# TPS for Burma (Myanmar) Extended and Redesignated for 18 Months; Certain EADs Automatically Extended Through May 25, 2025

Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas extended and redesignated Burma for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from May 26, 2024, through Nov. 25, 2025. Nationals of Burma and individuals with no nationality who last habitually resided in Burma may submit an initial registration application under the redesignation of Burma for TPS and apply for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD). Current beneficiaries who want to maintain their status must re-register and may apply for a new EAD. 

Given the time frames for processing TPS re-registration and EAD renewal applications, USCIS has automatically extended through May 25, 2025, the validity of certain EADs issued under the TPS designation for Burma.

**Completing Form I-9**

To complete or update Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, for TPS Burma beneficiaries who present an EAD with a Category Code of A12 or C19 and a Card Expires date of May 25, 2024, or Nov. 25, 2022, enter May 25, 2025, on Form I-9 as the new expiration date of the automatically extended EAD. You must reverify these employees before they start work on May 26, 2025.

Find more details about this extension and redesignation on the TPS designation for Burma page and instructions for completing Form I-9 on the I-9 Central TPS page. 

03/25/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 11-06

IN RE:COURT CLOSED ON TUESDAY,JANUARY 2, 2007

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United StatesCourtof Appeals for Veterans Claims will be closed

on Tuesday, January 2, 2007, to join in the official mourning of the death of President Gerald R. Ford, the

38th President of the United States.

For purposes of computation of time, under the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, January

2, 2007, will be considered a day when the Clerk's office has been closed. See U.S. VET. APP. R.

26(a)(1).

DATED: December 29, 2006 FOR THE COURT:

NORMAN Y. HERRING

Clerk of the Court
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tropical Sportswear
Int'l  Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarter ended April 3, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Michael Kagan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  to the best
of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies  with the  requirements  of  Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and

         (2)      The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
                  all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Michael Kagan
                                                     Michael Kagan
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     May 11, 2004
```
Exhibit 10.1
  April
28, 2008
 
 
 Donald
J. Meyer (“Executive”)
 625
Madison Ave., 5th Floor
 New
York, New York 10022
 
 RE: 
Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement
 
 Dear
Donald:
 
 On
January 1, 2007, you and Centerline Capital Group, Inc.(the “Company”) entered
into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”).  Pursuant to
Section 10(b) of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by a written
instrument signed by the Executive and the Company.  The parties
hereto wish to amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein.
 
 THEREFORE,
the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
 
 1.           Amendment
of Agreement.  Section 3,
entitled Compensation
and Benefits, shall be amended to include a salary reduction of 10% in
base salary.  The following sentences shall be incorporated at the end
of section 3 (a), and read as follows:
 
 The
Executive agrees to a voluntary reduction in his base salary of 10% for the
period April 21, 2008 (the “Effective Date”) through
December 31, 2008 (the “End
Date”).  The Company will pay the Executive an amended base
salary (subsequent to the Effective Date and through the End Date, (“Salary”) of $360,000.00 per
annum payable in equal bi-weekly installments.  This reduction in
Salary is voluntary and does not constitute Good Reason, as defined in
Exhibit A of the Agreement.  The Parties agree that the reduction in
Salary is being done to reduce the Company’s overhead and compensation expense
and is contingent upon every person listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto, executing a
similar amendment to his Employment Agreement.  Unless otherwise
agreed to by Executive, on January 1, 2009, the Executive’s Salary will return
to $400,000.00.  Anything in this Agreement, as amended by this
Amendment, to the contrary notwithstanding, if the Executive’s employment with
the Company is terminated after the Effective Date and prior to January 1, 2009,
his Salary used in determining Severance Pay, if applicable,
will be the base Salary of $400,000.00, as originally stated in the
Agreement.
 
 2.           Effect of
Amendment.  The parties herby agree and acknowledge that except
as provided in this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect
and has not been modified in any other respect.
  
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Agreement, Centerline Capital Group, Inc. and
Centerline Holding Company acting by their respective duly authorized officers,
effective as of the Effective Date.
 
 
 CENTERLINE
      CAPITAL GROUP, INC.:
              
              EXECUTIVE:ByName: Marc D.
      Schnitzer
                Title:    President
              
              Name: Donald J.
      MeyerCENTERLINE
      HOLDING COMPANYByName: Marc D.
      Schnitzer
                Title:    Chief Executive Officer and
      President
 
 
  
  EXHIBIT A
 
 
 Marc
D. Schnitzer
 Leonard
W. Cotton
 James
L. Duggins
 Robert
L. Levy
 Paul
Smyth
 Chris
Crouch
 Andrew
J. Weil
 Justin
E. Ginsberg
 John
E. D’Amico
 Nicholas
A. C. Mumford
 Donald
J. Meyer
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.32

NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED
MEETING OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE
DECEMBER 16, 1993

E X T R A C T

RESOLVED, That the remuneration provided for in these resolutions shall be
paid quarterly, in arrears, in U.S. currency or, at the request of a Director,
in the Canadian dollar equivalent thereof;

RESOLVED, That commencing January 1, 1994 each Director of Northern
Telecom Limited who ceases to hold office as such on or after January 1, 1994,
other than for reasons which in the opinion of the Board of Directors
constitutes misfeasance, shall be paid base retirement compensation by the
Corporation at the rate of 75 percent of US$27,500 or, of the Board retainer
fee payable when the Director so ceases to hold office as such, whichever is
greater, plus indexed retirement compensation at the rate of 56.25% of any
increment in the Board retainer fee payable from time to time by the
Corporation over the amount serving for computation of the Directors base
retirement compensation;

RESOLVED, That such retirement compensation be paid, during the lifetime
of such Director or their surviving spouse, for the period equal to the
duration of such Directors tenure as a member of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation or ten (10) years, whichever may be the lesser; provided, however,
that such retirement compensation shall not be paid to any Director of the
Corporation who, immediately prior to the date on which such Director ceases to
hold office as such, was a salaried employee of the Corporation or of any of
its subsidiaries, or who was eligible or entitled to the payment of a monthly
pension or other retirement allowance under a pension plan or like arrangement
established or maintained by the Corporation or by any of its subsidiaries;





---



##### 



NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FEBRUARY 29, 1996

E X T R A C T

RESOLVED, That effective January 1, 1996, any individual elected as a
Director of the Corporation for the first time shall not be entitled to be paid
any retirement compensation by the Corporation; and

RESOLVED, That the resolutions with respect to remuneration previously
adopted by the Board of Directors are hereby repealed to the extent
inconsistent with the preceding resolutions; provided, for greater certainty,
that the resolutions adopted December 16, 1993 with respect to retirement
compensation payable to Directors of the Corporation shall continue to apply to
Directors elected prior to December 31, 1995.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      20,235,068
<SECURITIES>                                26,856,864
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,446,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,947
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,107,864
<PP&E>                                       2,881,573
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,065,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,269,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,912,144
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       169,469
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,671,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,269,931
<SALES>                                         21,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,551,180
<CGS>                                           63,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,688,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,338,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                91,455
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,760,711)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,760,711)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,760,711)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)


</TABLE>
#### David J. Romano, Sr., as Administrator of the Estate of David J. Romano, Jr., Deceased, Appellant, v Dean L. Boice et al., Respondents.

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered October 31, 1985 in Saratoga County, which granted defendants’ motion to strike the complaint.

In 1983, David J. Romano, Jr. (decedent) was killed when he was struck by a car owned by defendant Richard L. Boice and operated by defendant Dean L. Boice. Shortly thereafter, plaintiff, decedent’s father, commenced this action on decedent’s behalf.

In March 1984, while plaintiff was being deposed, he refused, upon advice of his attorney, to answer certain questions regarding suicidal tendencies on the part of decedent. Plaintiff also refused to respond to a notice for discovery and inspection seeking copies of decedent’s income tax returns and all prescriptions and medications being taken by decedent. Defendants moved to compel answers to the questions asked at the examination before trial and compliance with the discovery demand. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. Supreme Court granted the motion and gave plaintiff 30 days to comply.

After plaintiff failed to comply with the order, defendants moved to strike the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3). Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. Supreme Court issued a conditional order on September 16, 1985, giving plaintiff 30 days to comply or the complaint would be stricken with prejudice. An extension to October 30, 1985 was granted by Supreme Court. By that date, plaintiff had apparently made some effort to comply. Nonetheless, on October 31, 1985, defendants submitted an application and obtained an ex parte order striking the complaint. This appeal by plaintiff ensued.

This appeal must be dismissed since an appeal does not lie from an order granted ex parte (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; *see, James v Powell,*30 AD2d 340, 341, *affd*23 NY2d 691). Plaintiff’s *938contentions that he complied, at least in spirit, with the conditional order and that, in any event, based on the circumstances, noncompliance should be excused, cannot be passed on since they obviously were not before Supreme Court when the ex parte order was made. Further, it cannot be argued that Supreme Court abused its discretion since it has not yet had an opportunity to exercise its discretion. Plaintiffs remedy is to move before Supreme Court to vacate the order striking the complaint. After such motion is determined, the aggrieved party may pursue its appellate remedies.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 3-00

IN THE MATTER OF THE RETIREMENT OF ROBERT F. COMEAU

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge; FARLEY, HOLDAWAY,

 IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges; and NEBEKER, Chief Judge emeritus

O R D E R

Robert F. Comeau was appointed by Chief Judge Frank Q. Nebeker to be special assistant

to the Chief Judge on March 25, 1990. He served in that capacity until July 1, 1990, when he was

appointed Executive Officer and Clerk of the Court. As part of the first cadre of administrative staff

to serve the Court, he played a central role in creating the infrastructure of this, the Nation’s newest

national tribunal, as well as in formulating the rules and procedures essential to its efficient

operation.

Mr. Comeau dedicated himself to making this Court accessible to and understandable by the

veteran. He was tireless in his efforts to simplify the Court’s rules, notices, and orders, hunting

down and eliminating “legalese” wherever he found it. He made presentations to veterans groups

throughout the countryand taught at orientation sessions for attorneys new to the practice of veterans

law.

Because the Court had little or no history prior to Mr. Comeau’s arrival, virtually every

problem he faced was unprecedented. Maintaining appropriate staffing levels with no historical case

load data, preserving morale and efficiency during multiple government shutdowns, and dealing with

Congressional committees unaccustomed to the needs and requirements of a federal court were but

a few of the many challenges he ably overcame. He leaves behind an efficient, “well-oiled machine”

as a monument to his vision and leadership. On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that Robert F. Comeau will take with him our gratitude for the years of

outstanding service he has rendered to the Court, our admiration for his many accomplishments, the

warmth of our continued friendship, and our best wishes.

DATED: October 31, 2000 PER CURIAM.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         120,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,965
<PP&E>                                          96,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,578)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 227,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,759
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           468
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   227,548
<SALES>                                          9,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,133
<CGS>                                            4,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,564)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,056)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,056)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>