alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4

Promissory Note


$3861.00                                                  December 31, 2002
                                                          Newport Beach, CA


     On Demand  for value received the undersigned promises to pay in
lawful money of the United States of America to the order of Mezzanine
Associates, LLC, nominee or assignee, the sum of Three Thousand Eight
Hundred Sixty-One Dollars ($3861.00), with interest from December 31, 2002
until paid at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum).

     Should interest not be paid, it shall thereafter bear interest as the
principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an
amount equal to simple interest on the principal at the maximum rate
permitted by law.  The undersigned hereby waives presentment of payment,
protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and diligence in bringing
suit, and further agrees, in case suit is instituted, to collect this
Promissory Note or any portion thereof, to pay such additional sum for
attorneys' fees as the Court may adjudge reasonable in such suit.



                                   Whitelight Corporation



                                   By: /s/ Eric Chess Bronk
                                   ____________________________________
                                   Eric Chess Bronk,  President
# Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization

**Alert:** We have updated the filing address to request a replacement Employment Authorization Document (EAD) that contains a mistake due to USCIS error. Please follow the instructions listed below for card replacements due to USCIS error.

If you are filing Form I-765 with another form, file both forms at the location specified for the other form. For example, if you are filing Form I-765 with Form I-539, file both forms according to the Form I-539 Instructions. Use the addresses below only when you are NOT submitting Form I-765 with another form.

**Applications that are not mailed to the appropriate filing location may experience processing delays.**

**E-Notification:** If you want to receive an email and/or a text message that we have accepted your form at a USCIS lockbox, complete Form G-1145, E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance, and clip it to the first page of your form.

03/26/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
H. R. 2607 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7802 37th 

Avenue in Jackson Heights, New York, as the ‘‘Jeanne and Jules Manford Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JEANNE AND JULES MANFORD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 7802 37th Avenue in Jackson Heights, New 

York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jeanne and Jules 

Manford Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Jeanne and Jules Manford Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Central, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Doyal
G. Bryant President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:
(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ Doyal G. Bryant
                                           -------------------
                                           Doyal G. Bryant
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

April 19, 2005
#### Benjamin W. Cohen et al., Appellants, v Donald Wales, Defendant, and Board of Education of the Warwick School District, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.), dated April 14, 1986, which granted the motion of defendant the Board of Education of the Warwick School District (here*95inafter Warwick) to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In opposing Warwick’s motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs failed to carry their burden of establishing a sufficient factual predicate on which to posit a duty of care owed by it to the infant plaintiff *(see,*CPLR 3013). The plaintiffs’ claim of negligence against Warwick is based on the fact that it recommended a former employee for a position as a grammar school teacher with the Tri-Valley School District without disclosing that the teacher had been charged with sexual misconduct. Some 11 years after becoming employed by the Tri-Valley School District, the teacher caused injury to the infant plaintiff. An action for negligence does not lie unless there exists a duty on the part of the defendant and a corresponding right in the plaintiff *(Palsgraf v Long Is. R. R.,*248 NY 339, 341). The common law imposes no duty to control the conduct of another or to warn those endangered by such conduct, in the absence of a special relationship between either the person who threatens harmful conduct or the foreseeable victim *(Pulka v Edelman,*40 NY2d 781, 782-783, *rearg denied*41 NY2d 901). The mere recommendation of a person for potential employment is not a proper basis for asserting a claim of negligence where another party is responsible for the actual hiring *(Bell v Perrino,*112 AD2d 124, *lv denied*66 NY2d 604, 895). Nor are there sound policy reasons warranting the expansion of the common-law duty of the schools since the plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law as against the school district which had custody of the infant at the time of the injury and also against the wrongdoer *(see, Pratt v Robinson,*39 NY2d 554, 560). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1











Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaDel Pharma Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Steven B. Ratoff, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Craig A. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 16, 2010
By:
/s/ Steven B. RatoffSteven B. RatoffPresident and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date:  August 16, 2010
By:
/s/ Craig A. JohnsonCraig A. JohnsonChief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-146797,
333-136119 and 333-127720 on Form S-3 and No. 333-136121 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 28, 2008,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of O2Diesel Corporation as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit), and
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the period October 14, 2000 (inception) through December 31, 2007, included in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of O2Diesel Corporation.

/s/
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.

Plymouth
Meeting, Pennsylvania
March 31, 2008

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Consolidated Income of Solutia Inc. for the nine months ended
September 30, 1997, and the Statement of Consolidated Financial Position as of
September 30, 1997. Such information is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such combined financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              92
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      475
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                        315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,173
<PP&E>                                           3,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              700
<BONDS>                                            974
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (94)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,914
<SALES>                                          2,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,238
<CGS>                                            1,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    283
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  report  of  Global  Realty   Development
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert Kohn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  April  12, 2007                       By: /s/ Robert Kohn
                                                -----------------------
                                                Robert Kohn
                                                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.01

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SigmaTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of SigmaTel,
Inc. certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SigmaTel, Inc.
for the periods presented therein.

Date: May 10, 2006



/s/ Ronald P. EdgertonRonald P. EdgertonChief Executive Officer


Date: May 10, 2006



/s/ Ross A. GoolsbyRoss A. GoolsbyChief Financial Officer


A signed original of the above certification has been provided to SigmaTel, Inc. and will be retained by
SigmaTel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On or about March7,2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of

Settlement Agreement and Entry ofConsent Orderl to be approved as a settlement ofthe case

under 33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

I have carefully reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find it is fair and

reasonable and in substantial compliance with the requirements of33 C.F.R. $ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED, the Settlement Agreement is

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated March 20,2023, at

Alameda, Califomia

Timothy G. Stueve

Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Coast Guard

I CwO Bush clarified via email that Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) number should read as

000542196, as listed on the complaint. The s€ttlement Agreement inadvertently shows the MMC number as

000542198.
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 32(a)


 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jeffry N. Quinn, Chief Executive Officer of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 5, 2004



                                                /s/ JEFFRY N. QUINN
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Jeffry N. Quinn
                                                Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc.
and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

 

/s/ BERNARD F. SERGESKETTER

Bernard F. Sergesketter

August 11, 2008

 

/s/AMY T. FORSTER

Amy T. Forster

August 11, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Westell Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Westell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
# How Can I Delete My USCIS Online Account?

Contact Us

There are three types of accounts in myUSCIS:
                - Applicant, Petitioner or Requestor account  is for people submitting forms on their own without a legal representative;
                - Legal representative account  is for attorneys and accredited representatives; and
                - H-1B Registrant account  is to register for the H-1B random selection process.

If you have selected the incorrect account type and have not submitted an online form to USCIS using the account' you may delete your account and start a new one.

Drafts of forms and registrations must be deleted to successfully delete the account.

**PLEASE NOTE:**A Legal Representative’s account cannot be deleted if their profile has been fully completed.

**Follow these steps to delete your USCIS online account:**

01/30/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
(8 Misc. Rep. 6.)

#### RUSS et al. v. STRATTON et al. FRASER et al. v. DUNCAN et al.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

April 2, 1894.)

Parties—Interest in Subject of Action.

In an action to set aside a sale of a leasehold, a title insurance company has no interest in the subject of the controversy, within Code Civ. Proc. § 452, by virtue of having insured the title to the property, and is therefore not entitled as a matter of right to be made a defendant.

Appeal from special term.

.Actions, one by Herman Russ and others against Eliza Stratton and others and the Lawyers’ Title Insurance Company of New York, and the other by Louis E. Fraser and another against Minna Duncan and others and the Lawyers’ Title Insurance Company of New York. From an order making the title insurance company a defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed.

The property in controversy consists of Columbia College leaseholds, which, after several renewals, came into the possession of plaintiffs, who were then infants. A transfer of the property was executed by persons representing themselves to be plaintiffs, and afterwards the property was sold under a judgment, and purchased by defendants’ grantor. Plaintiffs now sue to set aside the sale on the ground that they were infants, and also to set aside the transfer on the same ground. The Lawyers’ Title Insurance Company of New York claims that it is entitled to be made a party defendant to the action on the ground that it has an interest therein by virtue of having insured the title to the property in controversy.

Argued before SEDGWICK, C. J., and DUGRO and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.

*393D. M. Porter, for appellants.

Parsons, Shepard & Ogden (David B. Ogden, of counsel), for respondent.

DUGRO, J.

The respondent was not entitled to be made a deby the action is the real property, and in this the respondent has no interest. Its interest is only in the question involved in the action, and this is not the interest to which section 452 refers. A consequential interest will not suffice. Barb. Parties, 488. The special term had power to direct the respondent to be made a defendant, though not required to do so by the Code provision (Bank v. Farthing, 101 N. Y. 344, 4 N. E. 734), but naturally this power ought not to have been exercised, except for sufficient reason. The papers disclose none. There is no charge of misconduct against the insured, nor does there appear to be any reason to doubt that the respondent will have a fair opportunity to protect its»interest without being a defendant. Under the circumstances, the motion should not have been granted. Davies v. Fish, 47 Hun, 314. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.