alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 TheHONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3830

___________ Harry James Sutton, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. U.S. Probation Office; Timothy M. * Scharr, U.S. Probation Officer; * [UNPUBLISHED] Kathleen M. Hawk, Director of Bureau, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: July 26, 2001 Filed: August 1, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Harry James Sutton appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of his action under the Privacy Act, in which he alleged that his presentence report contained “inaccurate” information. This appeal is frivolous, and therefore we dismiss it. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 7, 2013

jam

Order 

Clerk

June 7, 2013

147213 (21)

THOMAS RAYMOND BENDER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 147213

COA: 312987

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

and 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $56.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$319.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
# USCIS Past Training Seminars

Since 2007, USCIS has offered free training seminars designed to enhance the skills needed to teach U.S. history, civics, and the naturalization process to immigrant students. See past training events.

Training seminars from 2007-2019 (PDF, 331.57 KB).

09/20/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Shoreside  Investments, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert  M.  Karz,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




                                   /s/Robert  M.  Karz
                                   -------------------------
                                   Robert  M.  Karz
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer
                                   July  30,  2003
NAMBE FALLS RESERVOIRLatitude: 35.847Longitude: -105.903Elevation: 6305

NAMBE FALLS RESERVOIR

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Rio Santa Barbara Site Page...



Rio Santa Barbara

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Alcalde Site Page...



Alcalde

Courtesy NRCS - Go to Santa Fe Site Page...



Santa Fe
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John B. Zumwalt, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|December 23, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John B. Zumwalt, III
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | John B. Zumwalt, III                                
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5950 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5950

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of 
 observation status in a hospital exceeding 24 hours toward satisfying 
   the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of skilled 
               nursing facility services under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2010

 Mr. Courtney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of 
 observation status in a hospital exceeding 24 hours toward satisfying 
   the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of skilled 
               nursing facility services under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Access to Medicare 
Coverage Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. COUNTING A PERIOD OF OBSERVATION STATUS IN A HOSPITAL EXCEEDING 
              24 HOURS TOWARD THE 3-DAY INPATIENT HOSPITAL REQUIREMENT 
              FOR COVERAGE OF SKILLED NURSING FACILITY SERVICES UNDER 
              MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(i) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(i)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``For 
purposes of this subsection, an individual who is in a period of 
observation status in a hospital that exceeds 24 hours shall be deemed 
to have been an inpatient during such period of observation status and 
the individual's leaving the hospital after such period of status shall 
be treated as a discharge from the hospital.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to periods of observation status beginning on or after January 1, 
2010, but applies to a period of post-hospital extended care services 
that was completed before the date of the enactment of this Act only if 
an administrative appeal is or has been made with respect to such 
services not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services may implement such amendment through an 
interim final regulation, program instruction, or otherwise.
                                 <all>
```
# USCIS Extends Green Card Validity for Conditional Permanent Residents with a Pending Form I-751 or Form I-829

01/23/2023

USCIS is extending the validity of Permanent Resident Cards (also known as Green Cards) for petitioners who properly file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence, or Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status for 48 months beyond the card’s expiration date. This change started on January 11, 2023, for Form I-829 and will start on January 25, 2023, for Form I-751.

We are making this change to accommodate current processing times for Form I-751 and Form I-829, which have increased over the past year.

USCIS has updated the language on Form I-751 and Form I-829 receipt notices to extend the validity of a Green Card for 48 months for individuals with a newly filed Form I-751 or Form I-829. We will issue new receipt notices to eligible conditional permanent residents who previously received notices with an extension shorter than 48 months and whose cases are still pending. These receipt notices can be presented with an expired Green Card as evidence of continued status, while the case remains pending with USCIS. By presenting your updated receipt notice with your expired Green Card, you remain authorized to work and travel for 48 months from the expiration date on the front of your expired Green Card.

As a reminder, conditional permanent residents who plan to be outside of the United States for a year or more should apply for a reentry permit by filing Form I-131, Application for Travel Document, before leaving the United States. For more information, see our International Travel as a Permanent Resident webpage.

01/23/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)



I, J. Michael Edenfield, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Logility, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |     |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: December 12, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ J. Michael Edenfield                    
|                        |  |     |  | J. Michael Edenfield Chief Executive
Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in
his capacity as an officer of SPACEHAB, Incorporated ("SPACEHAB"), that, to the
best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SPACEHAB on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of SPACEHAB.

Date: November 10, 2003


                                        /s/  Michael E. Kearney
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael E. Kearney
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SPACEHAB, INC. and will be retained by SPACEHAB, INC. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-112532) pertaining to the 2000
Stock Option Plan, 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Kintera, Inc. of our report dated February 6, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Kintera, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

| |  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
| |  | ---------------------

San Diego, California
March 24, 2004

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Alberto DiBella, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 11, 2003


/s/ Alberto DiBella
---------------------------
Alberto DiBella
Principal Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00514

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.E.S. and R.K.S., CHILDREN

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007

- CI

- 04448

Honorable Gloria Salda ñ a, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee Robert Scott Story recover his costs of this appeal

from appellant Kirsten Quimby.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5964 

To better inform consumers regarding costs associated with compliance for 

protecting endangered and threatened species under the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To better inform consumers regarding costs associated with 

compliance for protecting endangered and threatened 

species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Endangered Species 

5 Compliance and Transparency Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT COMPLIANCE ESTI7 MATION AND REPORTING. 

8 (a) CUSTOMER INFORMATION.—To better inform 

9 consumers regarding costs associated with compliance for 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5964 IH

1 protecting endangered and threatened species under the 

2 Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), 

3 the Administrator of each of the Bonneville Power Admin4 istration, the Western Area Power Administration, the 

5 Southwestern Power Administration, and the South6 eastern Power Administration shall include in monthly bil7 lings sent to each of the firm’s power customers informa8 tion estimating and reporting the costs of the customer’s 

9 share of the direct and indirect costs incurred by the ad10 ministration related to compliance with the Endangered 

11 Species Act of 1973 and activities related to such Act. 

12 (b) DIRECT COSTS.—Direct costs reported under 

13 subsection (a) shall include Federal agency obligations re14 lated to costs of studies; capital, operation, maintenance, 

15 and replacement costs; and staffing costs. 

16 (c) INDIRECT COSTS.—Indirect costs reported under 

17 subsection (a) shall include foregone generation and re18 placement power costs, including the net costs of any 

19 transmission. 

20 (d) COORDINATION.—The Director of the Bureau of 

21 Reclamation and the head of any other affected Federal 

22 agency shall assist the Administrators with the identifica23 tion of the costs. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5964 IH

1 SEC. 3. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973 COMPLIANCE 

2 REPORT. 

3 No later than January 30 of each year, each of the 

4 Administrators referred to in section 2(a), in coordination 

5 with the Bureau of Reclamation and other affected Fed6 eral agencies, shall provide an annual report to the Com7 mittee on Natural Resources of the House of Representa8 tives and the Committee on Environment and Public 

9 Works of the Senate estimating direct and indirect costs 

10 associated with compliance with the Endangered Species 

11 Act of 1973— 

12 (1) on a project-by-project basis, for the West13 ern Area Power Administration; and 

14 (2) on a systemwide basis, for each of the other 

15 power marketing administrations. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel VALIENTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50805

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Miguel Angel Valiente, Chaparral, NM, pro se.

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Defendant-Appellant Miguel Angel Valiente has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Valiente has not filed a response.

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” *Mosley v. Cozby,*813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). Article III, section 2, of the Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. *Spencer v. Kemna,*523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998). The case-or-controversy requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the now-ended incarceration or parole-some ‘collateral consequence’ of the conviction-must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” *Id.*(citation omitted).

During the pendency of this appeal, Defendant-Appellant Valiente completed the sentence of imprisonment that was imposed on the revocation of his supervised release and no further term of supervised release was imposed. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for us to address, and this appeal is dismissed as moot. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied as unnecessary.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.