alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Ixia pursuant to

Rule
13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act,

as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Victor Alston, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Ixia; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                    
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2013 |  | /s/ Victor Alston                                  
|                     |  | Victor Alston President and Chief Executive Officer
(8 Misc. Rep. 94.)

#### GUERINEAU et al. v. WEIL et al.

(Superior Court of New York City, Special Term.

April, 1894.)

Practice in Civil Cases—Transfer to Short-Cause Calendar.

Plaintiffs’ motion to transfer a cause to the short-cause calendar will be denied, where the moving affidavit admits that it will be necessary for plaintiffs to examine several witnesses, and defendants’ affidavit states that they will be obliged to examine at least six witnesses.

Action by William S. G-uerineau and others against Moses Weil and others. Plaintiffs move to place the cause on the special calendar for short causes. Denied.

Everett McKinstry, for the motion.

Benno Loewy, opposed.

*776GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This is a motion, under rule 22 of the rules of this court, to have the cause placed upon the special calendar for short causes. The rule provides that in any action on contract, where there is reason to believe that the trial will not occupy more than one hour, either party may apply, on notice, etc., to have the cause placed upon the special calendar for short causes; and in case the motion is granted, but the trial takes more than one hour, it imposes a penalty of not less than $10, nor more than $30, costs upon the party making the motion, while the cause may be restored to its position on the general calendar. It is within the discretionary power of the court, at special term, to determine whether or not there is reason to believe that the trial will not occupy more than one hour. In the case at bar the complaint alleges that plaintiffs rendered services to the defendants, at their request, as brokers, in the sale and exchange of certain real estate, for which defendants promised to pay to plaintiffs $250, no part of which has been paid. It also alleges that the plaintiffs were copartners, and that the defendants are executors of one Abraham Ostheim, deceased. The answer, after denying any information or belief as to the copartnership of plaintiffs, and after admitting the executor-ship of defendants, and admitting that they have not paid to plaintiffs the sum of $250, denies each and every other allegation of the complaint. Therefore, the whole cause of action is put squarely at issue. It also appears from the affidavit submitted by defendants that defendants will be necessarily obliged to examine at least six witnesses, and perhaps more, while, in the moving affidavit, plaintiffs admit that in order to prove their case it will be necessary for them to examine several witnesses. It does not seem to me that this is a case for the special calendar for short causes. If the motion is granted, and the case occupies more than an hour, the trial will have to be suspended; and the defendants will have been put to the expense and trouble of a mistrial, for which it may well be that the costs resulting from the mistrial, which cannot exceed $30, would be a very inadequate return. I am of opinion, therefore, that this is a case in which the court should exercise its discretionary power to deny the motion, but, under the circumstances, without costs. Motion denied, without costs.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00533

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF MAGDALENE B. MZYK, DECEASED

From the 81st Judicial District Court

, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21

- 01

- 00010

- CVK

Honorable Joel B. Johnson , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On March 2, 2022, we abated this appeal and remanded it to the trial court for entr y of a final judgment. We ordered appellant “to ensure that a supplemental clerk’s record with a final, appealable order or severance order is filed in this court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.” We also ordered appellant “to file a report in forming the court of the status of this case” if the trial court did not sign a final judgment within that time. On March 4, 2022, appellant filed a report indicating that the trial court had not yet signed a final order, but the parties are in the process of scheduling a hearing and “[i]t is anticipated that a final judgment will be signed within 30 days from the date of this Report.” Appellant requested that we continue the abatement “pending the trial court’s disposition of the parties’ respective claims for attorney’s fees and entry of final judgment.”

After consideration, we GRANT appellant’s request and extend the abatement of this appeal until May 17 , 2022 . We ORDER the parties to file a status update by May 17 , 2022 . We
ORDER that this case will be reinstated on the court’s docket by May 23, 2022

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of April, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5995 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5995

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the trade or 
    business expense deduction for damages paid pursuant to the Oil 
                         Pollution Act of 1990.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the trade or 
    business expense deduction for damages paid pursuant to the Oil 
                         Pollution Act of 1990.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Closing Oil Spill Tax Loopholes Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR PAYMENT OF OIL POLLUTION ACT CLAIMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by redesignating subsection (q) as subsection (r) and by 
inserting after subsection (p) the following new subsection:
    ``(q) Payment of Oil Pollution Act Claims.--No deduction shall be 
allowed under subsection (a) for any amount paid for any claim for 
damages (or paid in settlement of such a claim) under the Oil Pollution 
Act of 1990 with respect to any discharge of oil.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to discharges of oil occurring after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 11-08

IN RE: CHANGE IN FEE FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE COURT

O R D E R

The Court has determined that the need exists to increase the fee for admission to the Bar of

the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective November 14, 2008, the fee for admission to the Bar of the Court

will be $100.00.

DATED: November 14, 2008 FOR THE COURT:

NORMAN Y. HERRING

Clerk of the Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1540** 

CHARLES GODLOVE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MARTINSBURG SENIOR TOWERS, LP; MILLENNIA HOUSING MANAGEMENT LTD.; AMERICAN PRESERVATION BUILDERS LLC , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh , Chief District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00132

- GMG

- RWT )

Submitted : July 2 1 , 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charles Godlove, Appellant Pro Se. Jason S. Murphy, Susan Renee Snowden, MARTIN & SEIBERT, LC, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Gregory Ernest Kennedy , FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK PC, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles Godlove appeals the district court ’ s order s denying hi s motion for appointment of counsel and grant ing Appellees’ motion for summary judgment . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Godlove v. Martinsburg Senior Towers, LP , No. 3:14

- cv 00132

- GMG

- RWT (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 30, 3015, Apr. 21, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report
of Compugen Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I the undersigned, being the President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Alex Kotzer
Title:      President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date:       April 2, 2008



---

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-20993

Summary Calendar

_____________________

In the Matter of: RHI HOLDINGS, INC.; HILLTOP DEVELOPERS,

Debtors,

_______________________________________________

BARRY G. HITTNER

Appellee,

versus

SAMMY JO REEDER,

Appellant.

________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-95-3296)

________________________________________________

June 25, 1996

Before DAVIS, JONES and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sammy Jo Reeder appeals the district court's affirmance of the

dismissal by the bankruptcy court of her objection to the claim by

American Universal Insurance Company in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy

proceeding of RHI Holdings, Inc. Pursuant to our de novo review,

we conclude that Reeder's objection was properly dismissed, because
she does not have a pecuniary interest in the distribution of RHI's

estate and is not a party in interest under the Bankruptcy Code, 11

U.S.C. §§ 502(a) & 1109(b). Reeder is neither a creditor nor a

shareholder of RHI. (We note that the identical objection filed

jointly with Reeder by Interstate Underground Warehouse &

Industrial Park, Inc., of which she is the sole shareholder,

remains (was not dismissed), because RHI had scheduled Interstate

as a creditor.) For essentially the reasons stated by the district

court, the judgment is 

AFFIRMED.
# Requesting Records

The USCIS Genealogy Program is authorized to make five series of the agency’s historical records available to requesters.  Other agency records may be available from the USCIS Freedom of Information (FOIA) Program, or may have transferred to the National Archives.

Requests are accepted online as well as through the mail. Please read our Records Frequently Asked Questions and Common Errors section before submitting a request. Answers can also be found in our "Help" section.

## To request a record or file you MUST provide a file number.

### Records Available From the Genealogy Program

                
                - 	 Overview of all five available historical records 
                

### Details on Available Series

                
                - 	 Certificate Files, September 27, 1906 - March 31, 1956                   	
                  - 		 C-Files Image Gallery 	
                   
                
                - 	 Alien Registration Forms on Microfilm, 1940 - 1944                   	
                  - 		 A-R2 Forms Image Gallery 	
                   
                
                - 	 Visa Files, July 1, 1924 - March 31, 1944                   	
                  - 		 Visa Files Image Gallery 	
                   
                
                - 	 Registry Files, March 2, 1929 - March 31, 1944                   	
                  - 		 Registry Files Image Gallery 	
                   
                
                - 	 A-Files Numbered Below 8 Million                   	
                  - 		 A-Files Image Gallery 	
                   
                

12/23/2019

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>            0001043236
<NAME>           ELDER TRUST
<MULTIPLIER>            1000
<CURRENCY>              U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               2,069
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       32,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4,235
<PP&E>                                             182,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                      13,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     233,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               61,687
<BONDS>                                             20,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                71
<OTHER-SE>                                          73,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       233,391
<SALES>                                             13,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    13,505
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20,267<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (26,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (26,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (26,206)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (3.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (3.68)
<FN>
<F1>
Represents bad debt expense
</FN>




</TABLE>
# Solicite la Ciudadanía

Solicite la ciudadanía mediante el Formulario N-400, Solicitud de Naturalización, en línea. Existen exenciones y modificaciones en los requisitos de naturalización disponibles para quienes cualifican. USCIS también proporciona acomodos para personas que tengan alguna discapacidad.

Presente en Línea

Utilice esta sección del Centro de Recursos de Ciudadanía para aprender acerca de las sesiones de información gratuitas de USCIS que le ayudan a prepararse para el proceso de naturalización y encontrar asistencia en su comunidad.

Sesiones de Información Gratuitas Aprenda sobre el proceso de naturalización, requisitos de elegibilidad para convertirse en ciudadano, la entrevista y el examen en las sesiones de información gratuitas en su área.

Encuentre Ayuda en su Comunidad Encuentre una clase de inglés y/o ciudadanía, asistencia legal, y programas patrocinados por USCIS en su área.

04/02/2024

0 / 2000Para proteger su privacidad, por favor no incluya ninguna información personal en sus comentarios. Revise nuestra Política de Privacidad.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 26 3 . ROBERT J AY DAVI S v . THE STATE.

Ro b ert Jay D av i s ap p eal s fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s Au g u s t 1 9 , 2 0 1 5 , ord er d en y i n g h i s m o t i on t o m o d i fy a res t rai n i n g o rd er ag ai ns t h i m

. Dav i s fi led b o t h a d i s cret i o n ary
ap p li cat io n , Cas e No

. A1 6 D0 0 5 7 , an d t h i s di rect ap p eal
, s eek in g rev i ew o f th e s am e
t ri al co u rt o rd er. W e d en ied Dav i s ’ s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary ap p eal o n Oct o b er 1 9 , 2 0 1 5.
Becau s e t h at d en i al was an ad ju d icat i o n o n t h e m eri t s , t h e d o c t r i n e o f res ju d i cat a b ars t h i s di rect ap p eal

. See No r t h wes t S o ci a l & Ci vi c Cl u b, In c. v. Fr a n kl in , 2 7 6 Ga. 8 5 9 , 8 60 (5 8 3 SE2 d 8 58 ) (2 00 3 ); Ho o k v. Ber g en , 28 6 Ga. Ap p

. 2 5 8 , 2 6 0

- 2 6 1 (1 ) (6 4 9 SE2 d 3 1 3 ) (2 0 0 7 ). Th i s ap p eal i s t h erefo re DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/30/2015 October 30, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Broadwind Energy, Inc. (the "Company") for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Cameron Drecoll, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 12,
2010

/s/ J. CAMERON DRECOLL J. Cameron Drecoll Chief Executive Officer


This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ NATHANAEL V. LENTZNathanael V. LentzPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 15, 2007
   41
#### In the Matter of Bradshaw Samuels, Appellant, v Eugene S. LeFevre, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered June 16, 1986 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice John G. Connor. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.