alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 20702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10146]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3333]


State of Mississippi

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on April 
17, 2001, I find that Attala, Holmes, and Lee Counties in the State of 
Mississippi constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by 
Flooding and Severe Storms occurring between April 3-5, 2001. 
Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster 
may be filed until the close of business on June 17, 2001 and for 
economic injury until the close of business on January 17, 2002 at the 
address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, 
Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties in Mississippi 
may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Carroll, 
Chickasaw, Choctaw, Humphreys, Itawamba, Leake, Leflore, Madison, 
Monroe, Montgomery, Neshoba, Pontotoc, Prentiss, Union, Winston and 
Yazoo.
    The interest rates are:

For Physical Damage:                                             Percent
    Homeowners with credit available elsewhere................     6.625
    Homeowners without credit available elsewhere.............     3.312
    Businesses with credit available elsewhere................     8.000
    Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit         4.000
     available elsewhere......................................
    Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit        7.125
     available elsewhere......................................
For Economic Injury:
    Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without         4.000
     credit available elsewhere...............................
 

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 333306. 
For economic injury the number is 9L4900.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008).

    Dated: April 18, 2001.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-10146 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6102 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6102

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to 
    extend the authority of the Secretary of the Navy to enter into 
     multiyear contracts for F/A-18E, F/A-18F, and EA-18G aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 10, 2010

  Mr. Taylor (for himself, Mr. Akin, and Mr. Marshall) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to 
    extend the authority of the Secretary of the Navy to enter into 
     multiyear contracts for F/A-18E, F/A-18F, and EA-18G aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR F/A-18E, F/A-18F, AND 
              EA-18G AIRCRAFT.

    (a) Extension of Certification.--Paragraph (2) of section 128(a) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
111-84; 123 Stat. 2217) is amended by striking ``a reference to March'' 
and inserting ``a reference to September''.
    (b) Required Authority.--Such section 128 is further amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Required Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, with respect to a multiyear contract entered into under subsection 
(a), this section shall be deemed to meet the requirements under 
subsection (i)(3) and (l)(3) of section 2306b of title 10, United 
States Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of Sino
Clean Energy Inc. (“the Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the
Report”), I, Baowen Ren, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Baowen Ren
              Baowen
      Ren
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              Dated:
      April 15, 2008
Designated for publication on July 14, 2003

Designated for Electronic Publication Only

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 03-383

SUSAN FRASIER, APPELLANT,

 v.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before FARLEY, IVERS, and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

On June 4, 2003, the Court dismissed this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. On June 25,

2003, the pro se appellant filed a pleading styled as "Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration with

a Full Court." The Court will construe the pleading as a motion for a panel decision. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the parties' prior pleadings, and the record on appeal,

it is 

ORDERED that the appellant's motion for a panel decision is denied. 

DATED: Jul 10 2003 PER CURIAM.

STEINBERG, Judge, concurring: I agree that the appellant has not submitted a basis for

a panel decision in this case. However, I would return to the appellant her 49-page motion because

it is not contemplated by the Court's rules. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 35(f) (providing that "a motion

. . . under this rule may not exceed 15 pages"); see also U.S. VET. APP. R. 35(b), (c) (providing for

motions for a panel decision and full-Court decision, respectively).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Carlos Garcia, Appellant.

by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pi-taro, J.), rendered January 17, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed, and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

The only evidence tending to connect the defendant to the cocaine was his mere presence in an apartment in which the substance was found in a rear bedroom closet. Without more, this evidence is insufficient to conclude that the defendant exercised dominion and control over the cocaine, which is necessary to establish constructive possession *(see, People v Ortiz,*126 AD2d 677; *People v Reyes,*126 AD2d 681; *People v Rodriguez,*104 AD2d 832; *People v Sanabria,*73 AD2d 696). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Johnston, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), rendered April 27, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence adduced supports the findings that the defendant caused physical injury to a resident of the house he had burglarized *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *People v Coward,*100 AD2d 628) while in immediate flight from that building *(see,*
      *783Penal Law § 140.30 [2]; *People v Gladman,*41 NY2d 123). Upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The evidence at the hearing clearly showed that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant *(People v Scruggs,*90 AD2d 520, 521; *cf., People v Moore,*62 AD2d 155, 159-160 [Silverman, J., dissenting], *revd*47 NY2d 911, *on dissenting opn of Justice Silverman at App Div),*and was conducted within a reasonable period of time *(see, People v Veal,*106 AD2d 418; *People v Brnja,*70 AD2d 17, *affd*50 NY2d 366).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Niehoff, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Eiber, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Parque La Quinta
Estates (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bonita R. Alverez, President of the Company, hereby certifies for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: January 23, 2006                   By: /s/ BONITA R. ALVEREZ
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Bonita R. Alverez
                                          President and Director



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO PARQUE LA QUINTA ESTATES, AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY PARQUE LA QUINTA ESTATES, AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Antonio GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20528

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Victor Antonio Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#               I-363, Request to Enforce Affidavit of Financial Support and Intent to Petition for Legal Custody for Public Law 97-359 Amerasian

If, after admission to the United States, the beneficiary of a petition for a Public Law 97-359 Amerasian requires enforcement of the guarantee of financial support and intent to petition for legal custody, which was executed by the beneficiary's sponsor, the beneficiary may file this form with USCIS.

## Forms and Document Downloads

Form I-363  (PDF, 446.3 KB)

Instructions for Form I-363  (PDF, 201.86 KB)

## Form Details

04/01/24. Starting June 3, 2024, we will accept only the 04/01/24 edition. Until then, you can also use the 03/01/17 edition. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

This form should be filed with the USCIS district office having jurisdiction over the beneficiary's residence in the United States. You can find the appropriate USCIS office using the Field Office Locator.

You can find the filing fee for Form I-363 by visiting our Fee Schedule page. 

**Filing Tips:**Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.** We will reject any unsigned form.

                      - Find a USCIS Field Office

04/01/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 77 (Thursday, April 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9859]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Survivor Questionnaire.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: RL-94-F.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0032.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 6/30/2000.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 8,000.
    (8) Total annual responses: 8,000.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 1,391.
    (10) Collection description: Under Section 6 of the Railroad 
Retirement Act, benefits are payable to the survivors or the estate of 
deceased railroad employees. The Collection obtains information about 
the survivors if any, the payment of burial expenses and administration 
of estate when unknown to the Railroad Retirement Board. The 
information is used to determine whether and to whom benefits are 
payable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the forms and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Joe Lackey (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10230, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-9859 Filed 4-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Exhibit 32.1   BINGHAM CANYON CORPORATION   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  December 27, 2011/s/Brett D. Mayer
Brett D. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 13.1****Certification****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002In connection with the annual report of Metal Storm Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for theperiod ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Lee Finniear, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Metal Storm,certify, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Metal Storm.Date:May 18, 2007         By:                        /s/ LEE FINNIEAR    Name:  Lee Finniear    Title:  Chief Executive Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Metal Storm Limited (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Finniear, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Metal Storm, certify, for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|11. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|12. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2012



By:/s/ Lee FinniearName:

Lee FinniearTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 09-10

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGES

O R D E R

WHEREAS the Court receives approximately 300 Notices of Appeal every month, as well

as numerous motions and other filings, and 

WHEREAS appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court deserve timely judicial review

and decision, and 

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §7257 (b)(1) may recall

Senior Judges of the Court who have retired but who have agreed to be available for such recall

when their service is needed by the Court, and 

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court has determined that the service of two Senior

Judges is needed by the Court and, if recalled, they would perform substantial service to the Court

by reviewing and deciding appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court, and

WHEREAS Senior Judges John J. Farley, III, and Donald L. Ivers have agreed to be available

for recall as needed by the Court,

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that, effective on or about September 13, 2010, Senior Judges John J. Farley, III,

and Donald L. Ivers are recalled from retired status to have and to exercise all of the judicial powers

and duties of the office of a Judge in active service and otherwise perform substantial service in

reviewing and deciding appeals, motions, and other filings with the Court, until the Chief Judge of

the Court determines their service is no longer needed or 90 days, whichever is sooner, unless

extended by the Chief Judge with the consent of the Senior Judges.

DATED: August 18, 2010 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 601 

To provide for the conveyance of parcels of land to Mantua, Box Elder 

County, Utah. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2009 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance of parcels of land to Mantua, 

Box Elder County, Utah. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Box Elder Utah Land 

5 Conveyance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN LANDS TO MANTUA, BOX 

7 ELDER, UTAH. 

8 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Ag9 riculture shall convey, without consideration, to the town 

10 of Mantua, Utah (in this section referred to as the 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 601 IH

1 ‘‘town’’), all right, title, and interest of the United States 

2 in and to parcels of National Forest System land in the 

3 Wasatch-Cache National Forest in Box Elder County, 

4 Utah, consisting of approximately 31.5 acres within sec5 tion 27, township 9 north, range 1 west, Salt Lake merid6 ian and labeled as parcels A, B, and C on the map entitled 

7 ‘‘Box Elder Utah Land Conveyance Act’’ and dated July 

8 14, 2008. 

9 (b) SURVEY.—If necessary, the exact acreage and 

10 legal description of the lands to be conveyed under sub11 section (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory 

12 to the Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be borne 

13 by the town. 

14 (c) USE OF LAND.—As a condition of the conveyance 

15 under subsection (a), the town shall use the land conveyed 

16 under such subsection for public purposes. 

17 (d) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—In the quitclaim 

18 deed to the town prepared as part of the conveyance under 

19 subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide that the land 

20 conveyed to the town under such subsection shall revert 

21 to the Secretary, at the election of the Secretary, if the 

22 land is used for other than public purposes. 

23 (e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

24 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi25 tions in connection with the conveyance authorized under 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 601 IH

1 subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to 

2 protect the interests of the United States. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS