alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6114

DEANDRE JAMES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

PAUL ADAMS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00248-JPB)

Submitted: April 1, 2022 Decided: April 18, 2022

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeAndre James, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

DeAndre James seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction.1

 When the United States 

or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, parties are accorded 60 days after the entry 

of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), 

unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). However, if a party moves for an extension 

of time to appeal within 30 days after expiration of the original appeal period and 

demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause, a district court may extend the time to file 

a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A); Washington v. Bumgarner, 882 F.2d 899,

900-01 (4th Cir. 1989).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 8, 2021. James 

filed his notice of appeal on January 24, 2022, after the expiration of the 60-day appeal 

period but within the 30-day excusable neglect period.2

 Because James’ notice of appeal 

contained language requesting an extension of time to file his appeal, we construe it as a 

motion for an extension of time under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). Accordingly, we remand 

1 Although the district court dismissed the petition without prejudice, the dismissal 

order is final and appealable because mere amendment cannot cure the deficiencies 

identified by the district court. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 610 (4th Cir. 

2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).

2 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date James could have delivered the notice to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
3

this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether James 

demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the 60-day 

appeal period. The record, as supplemented, may then be returned to this court for further 

consideration.

REMANDED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6082 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6082

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an exemption from 
    tax for individuals with gross income of not more than $50,000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 10, 2010

 Mr. Stupak (for himself and Mr. Kagen) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an exemption from 
    tax for individuals with gross income of not more than $50,000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. $50,000 EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS OVER AGE 65.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before section 
140 the following new section:

``SEC. 139E. $50,000 EXEMPTION FOR INDIVIDUALS OVER AGE 65.

    ``(a) In General.--Gross income of an eligible individual shall be 
treated as zero for purposes of this chapter.
    ``(b) Eligible Individual.--For purposes of this section, the term 
`eligible individual' means any individual--
            ``(1) who (and if married, such taxpayer's spouse) has 
        attained the age of 65, and
            ``(2) whose gross income (determined without regard to this 
        section) is not more than $50,000.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for part III of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by inserting before 
the item relating to section 140 the following new item:

``Sec. 139E. $50,000 exemption for individuals over age 65.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# USCIS Updates Policy Guidance for International Students

12/20/2023

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing policy guidance regarding the F and M student nonimmigrant classifications, including the agency’s role in adjudicating applications for employment authorization, change of status, extension of stay, and reinstatement of status for these students and their dependents in the United States.

This guidance consolidates existing policy. USCIS expects that this will provide welcome clarity to international students and U.S. educational institutions on a wealth of topics, including eligibility requirements, school transfers, practical training, and on- and off-campus employment.

For example, the guidance clarifies that F and M students must have a foreign residence that they do not intend to abandon, but that such students may be the beneficiary of a permanent labor certification application or immigrant visa petition and may still be able to demonstrate their intention to depart after a temporary period of stay.

In addition, the guidance specifies how F students seeking an extension of optional practical training (OPT) based on their degree in a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) field may be employed by startup companies, as long as the employer adheres to the training plan requirements, remains in good standing with E-Verify, and provides compensation commensurate to that provided to similarly situated U.S. workers, among other requirements.

The nonimmigrant academic student (F-1) classification allows a noncitizen to enter the United States as a full-time student at a college, university, seminary, conservatory, academic high school, elementary school, or other academic institution, or in a language training program. The nonimmigrant vocational student (M-1) classification includes students in established vocational or other recognized nonacademic programs, other than language training programs.

For more information about the USCIS guidance, see the Policy Alert (PDF, 312.06 KB) and Volume 2, Part F of the Policy Manual. For more information about the role of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in administering these nonimmigrant student programs, see the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVIS).

12/20/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
# FY 2019 Grant Recipients

#### Archived Content

The information on this page is out of date. However, some of the content may still be useful, so we have archived the page.

## FY 2019 Citizenship and Assimilation Grant Program Award Recipients

In FY 2019, USCIS awarded nearly $10 million in grants to 41 organizations. The performance period is October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2021.

For more information, please see the FY 2019 grant program fact sheet (PDF, 172.33 KB) and news release.

03/06/2020

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5706 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5706

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2010

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the building occupied by the Government Printing Office 
located at 31451 East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, as the ``Frank 
              Evans Government Printing Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building occupied by the Government Printing Office located at 
31451 East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Frank Evans Government Printing Office Building'' 
during the period in which the building is occupied by the Government 
Printing Office.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    With respect to the period in which the building referred to in 
section 1 is occupied by the Government Printing Office, any reference 
in a law, map, regulation, document, record, or other paper of the 
United States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Frank Evans Government Printing Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 11.1

ContiFinancial Corporation
Calculation of Earnings Per Share
For the three months ended December 31, 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Basic and Diluted Computation for the three months ended December 31, 1998
<S>                                                                                              <C>           
Weighted average shares outstanding:

   Common stock excluding shares relating to employee incentive plans                               45,400,970

   Vested Restricted Shares Outstanding during the Quarter                                             739,737


                                                                                                 -------------
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                                                                 46,140,707
                                                                                                 -------------
Quarter income (loss)                                                                             ($58,800,000)
                                                                                                 -------------
Basic Earnings Per Share                                                                                ($1.27)
                                                                                                 =============

<CAPTION>
Basic and Diluted computation for the nine months ended December 31, 1998
<S>                                                                                              <C>           
Net Income (loss)                                                                                ($167,031,000)

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
        First quarter                                                           46,685,863
        Second quarter                                                          46,153,506
        Third quarter                                                           46,140,707
                                                                             -------------
          Average                                                                                   46,326,692
                                                                                                 -------------
      Year-to-date Basic  EPS                                                                           ($3.61)
                                                                                                 =============
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 05-17

IN RE: COURT CLOSURE ON MONDAY, JULY 3, 2017

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims will be

closed on Monday, July 3, 2017.

For purposes of computation and extension of time under the Court's Rules of Practice and

Procedure, Monday, July 3, 2017, will be considered a day when the Court is closed. See U.S. VET.

APP. R. 26(a)(1).

DATED: June 21, 2017 FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Gregory O. Block

GREGORY O. BLOCK

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit
32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Gene Logic Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

| |  | The Quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for
  the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | The information contained in such report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.                                                   

|Date: | August 6, 2004 | By:    /s/ Mark
  D. Gessler     
|----- | -------------- | ---------------------------------
|      |                |                                  
|      |                |                                  
|      |                |                                  
|      |                |                                  
|Date: | August 6, 2004 | By:   /s/
  Philip L. Rohrer, Jr.
|      |                |                                  
|      |                |                                  
|      |                |                                  

---

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 10, 2014

No. 04-13-00038-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF RAMIRO AGUILAR JR., DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2800

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant's motion for rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5763 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5763

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase for 2 years the 
residential energy credit and the investment tax credit with respect to 
  solar property with a nameplate capacity of less than 20 kilowatts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2010

    Mr. Polis of Colorado (for himself and Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase for 2 years the 
residential energy credit and the investment tax credit with respect to 
  solar property with a nameplate capacity of less than 20 kilowatts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Solar Expansion of Distributed 
Generation Exponentially Act'' or the ``Solar EDGE Act''.

SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR INCREASE FOR CERTAIN SOLAR PROPERTY EXPENDITURES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 25D of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(9) Two-year increase for certain solar property 
        expenditures.--In the case of qualified solar electric property 
        expenditures for taxable years beginning during 2010 or 2011 
        with respect to property which has a nameplate capacity of less 
        than 20 kilowatts (or thermal energy equivalent), subsection 
        (a)(1) shall be applied by substituting `50 percent' for `30 
        percent'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.

SEC. 3. TWO-YEAR INCREASE FOR CERTAIN SOLAR PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 48 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Two-year increase for certain solar property.--In the 
        case of property which--
                    ``(A) uses solar energy to generate electricity, to 
                heat water, or to heat or cool a structure,
                    ``(B) is placed in service during 2010 or 2011, and
                    ``(C) has a nameplate capacity of less than 20 
                kilowatts (or thermal energy equivalent),
        the energy percentage shall be 50 percent.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.            

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector     

Date: May 12,2006

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration on Aging 

          - [Program Announcement No. AoA-00-3] 

# AGENCY:

Administration on Aging, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Announcement of availability of funds and request for applications to establish, or expand and improve, Statewide Senior Legal Hotlines whose purpose is to advance the quality and accessibility of the legal assistance provided to older people. 

# SUMMARY:

The Administration on Aging announces that under this program announcement it will hold a competition for grant awards for four (4) to five (5) projects that establish, or expand and improve, Statewide Senior Legal Hotlines aimed at advancing the quality and accessibility of the legal assistance provided to older people. 

The deadline date for the submission of applications is June 16, 2000. Eligibility for grant awards is limited to public and/or nonprofit agencies, organizations, and institutions experienced in providing legal assistance to older persons. 

Application kits are available by writing to the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging, Office of Program Development, 330 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 4264, Washington, DC 20201, or by calling 202/619-2987. 

Dated: April 12, 2000. 

Jeanette C. Takamura, 

Assistant Secretary for Aging. 

[FR Doc. 00-9643 Filed 4-17-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5831 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1081 Elbel Road in Schertz, Texas, as the ‘‘Schertz Veterans Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2010 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1081 Elbel Road in Schertz, Texas, as the 

‘‘Schertz Veterans Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SCHERTZ VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1081 Elbel Road in Schertz, 

6 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Schertz Vet7 erans Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5831 IH

1 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Schertz Veterans Post 

2 Office’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 15.4



LOGO

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Office of the Chief Accountant

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Re: ViryaNet Ltd.

SEC File No. 000-31513

Dear Sir or
Madam:

We have read Item 16F of ViryaNet Ltd on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2013, and agree with the statements concerning our Firm contained therein.

Very truly
yours,

/s/ Arik Eshel, CPA & Assoc., PC

New York, NY, USA

April 26, 2013