alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANACIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PALADYNE
CORP. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                             664
<SECURITIES>                                       485
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1283
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2416
<PP&E>                                             511
<DEPRECIATION>                                     356
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                        1821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2890
<SALES>                                           3828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3828
<CGS>                                             2203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     87
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 87
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        57
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01



</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

United States Coast GuardU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Search
Search

Search

-  Home    -  News Room             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Forcecom             
  -  Operations             
  -  Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  History 
-  Units    -  Organization             
  -  Coast Guard A to Z             
  -  Atlantic Area             
  -  Pacific Area             
  -  Force Readiness Command 
-  Leadership    -  Commandant’s Initiatives             
  -  Senior Leadership             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Operations             
  -  Deputy Commandant for Mission Support             
  -  Atlantic Area Commander             
  -  Pacific Area Commander             
  -  Reserve             
  -  Auxiliary 
-  Resources    -  CG Support             
  -  Legal      -  JoinCGJAG             
    -  Legal_Assistance        -  Find-A-Legal-Assistance-Lawyer             
      -  FAQ 
  -  Civil Rights             
  -  Work-Life             
  -  Administrative Law Judges      -  Virtual Hearing 
  -  Newsroom             
  -  Family             
  -  Library             
  -  CG Web Mail             
  -  Return 2 Service      -  FAQ 
-  Community    -  Art Program             
  -  Girl Scouts / Boy Scouts      -  Eagle Scout Recognition 
  -  Coast Guard Band             
  -  Coast Guard Cities             
  -  Honor Guard             
  -  JROTC      -  NEWS 
  -  Special Programs      -  Industry Academy        -  Contacts             
      -  2018 
  -  Trademark             
  -  Resources      -  History             
    -  CGC Eagle 
-  Mariners    -  National Vessel Documentation Center             
  -  National Maritime Center             
  -  National Pollution Funds Center      -  NRD        -  NRD_FAQs             
      -  Trustee_Links             
      -  NRD_DOCS             
      -  About_NRD_Funding 
  -  Boating Safety 
-  doing business		 
-  Join		 
-  Recruiting		 
-  contact		 
-  About		 

HomeResourcesAdministrative Law JudgesDecisionsALJ Decisions 2019ALJ Decisions1999 ALJ  Decisions and Orders

**ALJ Decisions: 1999**

 

 

**

                      - FOIA
                      - Privacy Policy
                      - MHS Notice of Privacy Practices
                      - Accessibility
                      - No FEAR
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                      - DHS Office of Inspector General
                      - WhiteHouse.gov
                      - USA.gov

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 32(i)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     In connection with the Annual Report of Opus Communities, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Carlton Fleming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section
1350, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: May    , 2005
           ---                                  --------------------------------
                                                         Carlton Fleming
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-139684, 333-130416 and 333-121852; and Form S-8 Nos. 333-139816, 333-128927 and 333-112532 pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 2004Equity Incentive Plan (Fundware), the Kintera, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan) of Kintera, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Kintera, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 26, 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

Complainant

vs. 

ALAN WADE TYLER 

Respondent

_________________________________ Docket Number 2009-0473 

Enforcement Activity No. 3627741

Order Correcting Written Decision Order

Issued: November 17, 2010

By Administrative Law Judge: Honorable Michael J Devine

Appearances: 

LCDR Jason M. Krajewski 

Sector Baltimore 

For the Coast Guard 

Geoffrey S Tobias, Esq. 

For the Respondent 

On November 17, 2009 the parties submitted a motion for approval of a settlement 

agreement in this matter. The settlement agreement was reviewed and approved by a Consent 

Order issued on November 18, 2009 which incorporated the settlement agreement by reference 

into the Consent Order. On November 16, 2010, the undersigned conducted a hearing in the 

above named matter regarding the Coast Guard’s allegations that Respondent failed to 

successfully complete the settlement agreement. 

At the close of the hearing both Respondent and the Coast Guard in accordance with 33 

CFR 20.710 waived the right to submit written proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, 

1 
and the undersigned issued an oral bench decision pursuant to 33 CFR 20.902(c) revoking 

Respondent’s License in keeping with the terms of the settlement agreement and the record as a 

whole. A written Order memorializing the oral bench decision was issued later that day. The 

written order contains an error by attaching the usual appeal rights to the order. 

Paragraphs 1 and 5 of the settlement agreement provide that Respondent has waived the 

right to appeal and that the determination by the ALJ on whether the settlement agreement was 

completed or not is final and not subject to appeal. Therefore the Order of November 16, 2010 is 

corrected by deleting Attachment B and by changing the Order to read as follows: 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Merchant Mariner’s License and all other Coast 

Guard licenses, certificates and documents issued to Respondent Alan Wade Tyler are 

REVOKED. Respondent’s Merchant Mariner License has been surrendered to the U.S. Coast 

Guard Sector Baltimore, Maryland and shall be processed appropriately. Respondent must 

immediately surrender any other Coast Guard issued credentials to the Coast Guard, Sector 

Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21226-1791. If you knowingly continue 

to use your documents, you may be subject to criminal prosecution. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that in keeping with the terms of the settlement 

agreement this decision is final. 

__________________________________________________ 

Michael J Devine 

US Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge

Date: November 17, 2010

2
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Patrick G. Blanchard, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on form 10-QSB ofGeorgia-Carolina-Bancshares, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2003     /s/ Patrick G. Blanchard    Patrick G. BlanchardPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<Page>

                                                                      Exhibit 10

            CONSENT OF KOST FORER & GABBAY, A MEMBER OF ERNST & YOUNG
                          GLOBAL, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-12904), pertaining to the Tioga Technologies Ltd. Employee Share
Purchase plan and Tioga Share Incentive Plan, of our report, dated January 15,
2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Tioga Technologies
Ltd. included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31,
2002.

Tel Aviv, Israel

June 25, 2003

                             /s/ Kost Forer & Gabbay
                               Kost Forer & Gabbay,
                         A Member Of Ernst & Young Global
#### Loretta Rados, Respondent, v James Rados, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The direction that defendant pay 60% of plaintiff’s counsel fees of $75,000 was not an abuse of discretion nor was the award excessive *(Bushorr v Bushorr,*129 AD2d 989; *Kolmin v Kolmin,*65 AD2d 928). Contrary to defendant’s claims, we have not embraced the rule that a wife must be indigent in order for her to be awarded counsel fees. Rather, her resources or lack thereof are merely one factor to be considered in the totality of the financial circumstances *(Kolmin v Kolmin, supra; Alwardt v Alwardt,*41 AD2d 592; *see also, Walsh v Walsh,*92 AD2d 345, 346).

Moreover, the award of counsel fees was justified in view of defendant’s obstructionist and dilatory tactics *(Mulligan v Mulligan,*54 NY2d 614, *affg*79 AD2d 721; *Nemia v Nemia,*124 AD2d 407, 408; *Schussler v Schussler,*109 AD2d 875; *Stern v Stern,*67 AD2d 253). Defendant engaged in conduct to conceal and remove assets, thereby frustrating the court’s efforts to distribute the marital property equitably.

Finally, we exercise our discretionary authority to direct that defendant pay plaintiff’s counsel fees generated by this appeal *(see, Gannon v Gannon,*116 AD2d 1030). Application to fix the amount of such counsel fees and expenses should be made to the trial court. We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Desmond, J. H. O. —attorney’s fees.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

GENE LOGIC INC.
JUNE 30, 1999
EXHIBIT 11.1



                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended
                                                         June 30,                        June 30,
                                                 ------------------------        ------------------------
                                                   1999            1998            1999            1998
                                                 --------        --------        --------        --------
<S>                                              <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
BASIC AND DILUTED:

Weighted average common shares outstanding         19,797          14,219          19,754          14,060

Net loss                                         $ (4,385)       $ (1,458)       $ (9,335)       $ (3,568)
                                                 ========        ========        ========        ========

Net loss per common share                        $  (0.22)       $  (0.10)       $  (0.47)       $  (0.25)
                                                 ========        ========        ========        ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                    METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                                      <C>                 <C>

                                                                     Three Months Ended                  Three Months Ended
                                                                         September 30,                     September 30,
                                                                 --------------------------------  -------------------------------
                                                                      1997             1996             1997             1996
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------

NET LOSS
    Net loss.............................................         $ (7,562,398)    $  (2,201,161)    $(24,556,567)   $  (9,412,724)
    Deduct dividends on preferred shares.................                -                 -               76,562            -
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------
    Net loss applicable to common stock..................         $ (7,562,398)    $  (2,201,161)    $(24,633,129)   $  (9,412,724)
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------

SHARES
   Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding............................           9,564,940         9,892,503        9,663,020        8,606,848
   Assuming conversion of warrants
     and options outstanding..............................           2,930,154         2,930,154        2,930,154        2,930,154
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------
   Weighted average number of
     shares outstanding as adjusted.......................          12,495,094        12,822,657       12,593,174       11,537,002
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------
                                                                   
NET LOSS PER SHARE........................................        $      (0.61)      $     (0.17)    $      (1.96)     $     (0.82)
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------
                                                                 ----------------   -------------  ---------------  ---------------


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Pacel Corp. (the "Company") on
Form  [10-Q/10-  QSB] for the period  ending  June 30,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
E. Calkins,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



                                        /s/ David E. Calkins
                                        --------------------------------
                                        David E. Calkins
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 19, 2002
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 4-04

IN RE: RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Before IVERS, Chief Judge, and STEINBERG, GREENE,

KASOLD, and HAGEL, Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED that Joan E. Moriarty, Esq., is appointed as Chair of the Rules Advisory

Committee, for a term ending November 8, 2006.

DATED: November 8, 2004 BY THE COURT:

DONALD L. IVERS

Chief Judge
# USCIS Early Filing Calculator

**The information in this part ONLY relates to your time as a lawful permanent resident if you file under Section 319(a) and 316(a) of the INA. You MUST meet all other eligibility requirements when you file.**

You may file Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, 90 calendar days before you complete your continuous residence requirement if your eligibility for naturalization is based upon being a:
                - Permanent resident for at least 5 years;  or
                - Permanent resident for at least 3 years if you are married to a US citizen.

To determine your 90-day early filing date, begin by identifying your 5-year or 3-year date as a lawful permanent resident. For example, if the date on your Permanent Resident Card says “July 4, 2017,” you met the 5-year permanent resident requirement on July 4, 2022.

If you have met all other eligibility requirements, the earliest date you could apply for naturalization would be April 5, 2022, which is 90 days before July 4, 2022.

You may use the USCIS Early Filing Calculator to ensure you file your Form N-400 within the 90-day window. We will deny your form if you file more than 90 days before your anniversary date. 

For example: 04 28 2018

11/30/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.