alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6089 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6089

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate any time 
       limitation for granting equitable innocent spouse relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 10, 2010

Mrs. Bachmann introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate any time 
       limitation for granting equitable innocent spouse relief.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TIME LIMITATION FOR EQUITABLE INNOCENT SPOUSE 
              RELIEF.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (f) of section 6015 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``without regard to any 
time limitation'' before the period at the end.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to any liability for taxes arising or remaining unpaid on 
or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-26-2000
<CASH>                                           6,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (207)
<INVENTORY>                                     37,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,062
<PP&E>                                         100,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                (48,455)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,844
<BONDS>                                        170,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,339
<SALES>                                        155,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,376
<CGS>                                           56,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (390)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,913
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 11

                               NOVADEL PHARMA INC.

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION

                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                October 31, 2002
                                              --------------------
                                                     BASIC
                                              --------------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                   14,509,523
Dilutive effect of stock performance plans (1)                 -
                                              --------------------
     TOTAL                                            14,509,523

Net income (loss)                                         (1,714)
                                              --------------------

Earnings per share                                          (.12)
                                              --------------------

                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                October 31, 2001
                                              --------------------
                                                      BASIC
                                              --------------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                    7,724,900
Dilutive effect of stock performance planS (1)                --
                                              --------------------
     Total                                             7,724,900

Net income (loss)                                           (247)
                                              --------------------

Earnings per share                                          (.03)
                                              --------------------

(1)  No potential shares from stock performance plans have been
     presented, as their effect would be anti-dilutive

                                       12

<PAGE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41182 Conference Calendar

NESBITT EDWIN MADISON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus D. ATWOOD, Captain, Beto I, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:96-CV-782

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Nesbitt Edwin Madison, Texas prisoner #611189, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Captain D. Atwood of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID). Madison argues that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing as frivolous his claim that Atwood violated his due process rights by not classifying him as a Level 1 prisoner. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Eason v.No. 96-41182 -2- Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). A prisoner's liberty interest is “generally limited to freedom from restraint which, while not exceeding the sentence in such an unexpected manner as to give rise to protection by the Due Process Clause of its own force, nonetheless imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” Sandin v. Conner , 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995) (citation omitted). As Madison did not allege that a liberty or property interest protected by the due process clause, the district court did not err in dismissing his claim.
See Luken v. Scott , 71 F.3d 192, 193 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 1690 (1996); see also Moody v. Baker , 857 F.2d 256, 257-58 (5th Cir. 1988)(an inmate has neither a protected property nor liberty interest in his custody classification). Madison’s appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Madison previously has been warned by this court that he may be sanctioned for filing further frivolous pleadings. Madison v. Young , No. 96-10869, slip op. at 2 (5th Cir. Apr. 17, 1996). Accordingly, Madison is barred from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court or of this court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in thisNo. 96-41182 -3- Circuit are directed to return to Madison, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.
GMAC
Commercial Mortgage
550 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94101
Tel.  415-835-9200
Fax   415-391-2949


                          PNC Mortgage Acceptance Corp.
                                 Series 2000-C1
                        Annual Statement as to Compliance
                 For Period of June 1 through December 31, 2000


Pursuant to section 3.14 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, I attest that:

(i.)  A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer
      during the period,  and of its performance under this Agreement,  has been
      made under my supervision.

(ii.) To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on  such  review,  GMAC  Commercial
      Mortgage as Special  Servicer,  has fulfilled in all material respects all
      of its obligations  under this Agreement  throughout the period.  However,
      during the period of June 1 though  December  31,  2000,  GMAC  Commercial
      Mortgage  as Special  Servicer  did not  service  any  Specially  Serviced
      Mortgaged Loans.

(iv.) GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage  as Special  Servicer  has  received  no notice
      regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of the REMIC I, REMIC
      II or REMIC III as a REMIC from the Internal  Revenue Service or any other
      governmental agency or body.




BY:   /s/ Michele Heisler                 Date: 2/16/01
      ------------------------                  -------------------
      Michele Heisler
      Vice President, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 11.1



                 COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
            FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999

          The following calculation is submitted in accordance with requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 For the three months                  For the six months
                                                    ended June 30,                       ended June 30,
                                         ----------------------------------   ----------------------------------
                                                2000             1999                2000             1999
                                         ---------------    ---------------   ---------------    ---------------
                                                                 (amounts in thousands)
<S>                                      <C>                 <C>                <C>             <C>
Net loss available for common
     shareholders                             ($26,722)           ($1,832)         ($26,206)             ($873)
                                         =============      =============     =============      =============
Weighted average common
     shares outstanding used in
     calculating basic and
     diluted net loss per
     common share                                7,119              7,201             7,119              7,208
                                         =============      =============     =============      =============
Basic and diluted net loss per common
     share                                      ($3.75)            ($0.25)           ($3.68)            ($0.12)
                                         =============      =============     =============      =============


</TABLE>

                                       36
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 01-09

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1), and in order to meet the needs of the Court, recalleligible retired Judge Ronald M. Holdaway, is recalled to perform substantial service to the Court.

The Court requires Judge Holdaway's service to assist in reviewing and deciding an unprecedented

number of appeals now pending before the Court. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective February 2, 2009, Ronald M. Holdaway, shall commence

service as a judge of the Court for a period not to exceed 90 days.

DATED: January 7, 2009 BY THE COURT:

/s/ William P. Greene, Jr.

WILLIAM P. GREENE, JR.

Chief Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alberto DiBella, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 22, 2010






/s/ Alberto DiBella


Alberto DiBella


Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 09-12

IN RE: RECALL OF SENIOR JUDGE

O R D E R

WHEREAS the Court has a number of appeals ready for judicial review and decision and

pending assignment to a Judge, and

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1) may recall

Senior Judges of the Court who have retired but who have agreed to be available for such recall to

provide substantial service and,

WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Court has certified that the substantial service of a Senior

Judge is needed by the Court to help provide timely judicial review and decision of appeals now

ready for such review and decision and not yet assigned to a Judge, and

WHEREAS Senior Judge Donald L. Ivers has consented to be available for recall pursuant

to 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1),

THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED that, effective August 27, 2012, Judge Donald L. Ivers is recalled from retired

status to have and to exercise all of the judicial powers and duties of the office of a Judge in active

service and to review and decide, inter alia, appeals ready for such review and decision and not yet

assigned to a Judge as of the date of recall. Judge Ivers shall serve until completion of review and

decision of such appeals, or for a period of time not to exceed 90 days, whichever is sooner, unless

extended by the Chief Judge with the consent of Judge Ivers.

DATED: August 22, 2012 BY THE COURT:

Bruce E. Kasold

Chief Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5871 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5871

To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to allow 
  non-debt financing for for-profit companies in business incubators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2010

 Mr. Carnahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to allow 
  non-debt financing for for-profit companies in business incubators.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Entrepreneurial Economic 
Development Act'' or ``SEED Act''.

SEC. 2. NON-DEBT FINANCING IN DIRECT EXPENDITURE OR REDISTRIBUTION.

    Section 217(c) of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 
1965 (42 U.S.C. 3154c) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Economic Adjustment.--
            ``(1) Non-debt financing addition.--Subject to subsection 
        (d), a recipient of a grant under section 209 may directly 
        expend the grant funds or may redistribute the funds to public 
        and private organizations and entities in the form of a grant, 
        loan, loan guarantee, payment to reduce interest on a loan 
        guarantee, or other appropriate assistance, including non-debt 
        financing of for-profit companies in business incubators.
            ``(2) Definitions.--For purposes of this subsection--
                    ``(A) the term `business incubator' means an 
                organization or entity, including an academic 
                institution, established to foster the start-up of 
                businesses or accelerate the growth of fledgling 
                companies by providing entrepreneurs with resources and 
                services to produce viable businesses that can help 
                create jobs and restore vitality to distressed areas.
                    ``(B) the term non-debt financing means funding 
                used to help business incubators develop an idea and 
                create the first product to be brought to market for 
                the first time.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-26-1997
<CASH>                                               6,214
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         12,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    43,404
<PP&E>                                             309,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (38,246)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     392,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               93,640
<BONDS>                                            255,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               18,402
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                10
<OTHER-SE>                                           1,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       392,107
<SALES>                                                810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    14,621
<CGS>                                                  925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       38,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,448 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (35,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (13,714)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (20,995)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (23,426)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.59)
        


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL BORGES BORBA-CARDOSO,

Petitioner,

 v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 17-70742

Agency No. A030-861-138

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 5, 2020** 

Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BENCIVENGO,*** District

Judge.

 

Raul Borges Borba-Cardoso petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals order of removal. In a concurrently filed opinion, we hold

FILED

AUG 25 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Cathy Ann Bencivengo, United States District Judge

for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
that perjury under section 118(a) of the California Penal Code is an “offense

relating to . . . perjury” and is thus an “aggravated felony.” 8

U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S). Borba was convicted under section 118(a), and we

therefore lack jurisdiction over his petition for review. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(C).

PETITION DISMISSED.

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covad Communications
Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John E. Trewin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                             COVAD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.

                                             By:       /s/ JOHN E. TREWIN
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                          JOHN E. TREWIN
                                                    Senior Vice President and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 6, 2005