alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5825 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5825

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To review, update, and revise the factors to measure the severity, 
   magnitude, and impact of a disaster and to evaluate the need for 
               assistance to individuals and households.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Multi-State Disaster Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. INDIVIDUAL ASSISTANCE FACTORS.

    (a) In General.--In order to provide more objective criteria for 
evaluating the need for assistance to individuals and households and to 
speed a declaration of a major disaster or emergency under the Robert 
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
5121 et seq.), not later than one year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(referred to in this Act as the ``Administrator''), in cooperation with 
representatives of State and local emergency management agencies, shall 
review, update, and revise through rulemaking the factors considered 
under section 206.48(b) of title 44, Code of Federal Regulations, to 
measure the severity, magnitude, and impact of a disaster.
    (b) Consideration of a Contiguous County.--In reviewing, updating, 
and revising the factors referenced in subsection (a) the Administrator 
shall include as a factor whether a contiguous county in an adjacent 
state has been designated in a major disaster or emergency as a result 
of the same incident.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 3 months after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 
Senate a report on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's current 
regulations, policies, procedures, and practices on--
            (1) recommending major disaster or emergency declarations 
        in order to provide assistance to individuals and households; 
        and
            (2) making post-declaration designations of the need for 
        assistance to individuals and households in a county that is 
        contiguous to a State that has received a major disaster or 
        emergency declaration for the same incident.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income found on pages 3 & 4 of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the six months ending September 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,864
<SECURITIES>                                       102
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                       127
<INVENTORY>                                     29,558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,362
<PP&E>                                          51,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,054
<BONDS>                                         89,983
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,330
<SALES>                                         77,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,114
<CGS>                                           59,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,750
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5986 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5986

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2010

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require the submission of a report to the Congress on parasitic 
                     disease among poor Americans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Neglected Infections of Impoverished 
Americans Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE CURRENT STATE OF PARASITIC DISEASES 
              THAT HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED AMONG THE POOREST AMERICANS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 12 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
report to the Congress on the epidemiology of, impact of, and 
appropriate funding required to address neglected diseases of poverty, 
including neglected parasitic diseases such as--
            (1) Chagas disease;
            (2) cysticercosis;
            (3) toxocariasis;
            (4) toxoplasmosis;
            (5) trichomoniasis;
            (6) the soil-transmitted helminths; and
            (7) other related diseases, as designated by the Secretary.
    (b) Required Information.--The report under subsection (a) should 
provide the information necessary to guide future health policy to--
            (1) accurately evaluate the current state of knowledge 
        concerning diseases described in such subsection and define 
        gaps in such knowledge; and
            (2) address the threat of such diseases.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,535,829
<SECURITIES>                                   151,951
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,667,127
<PP&E>                                          16,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,715,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          308,890
<BONDS>                                      2,653,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,442
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,536,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,715,238
<SALES>                                         31,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,921
<CGS>                                           35,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (85,159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (85,159)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (85,159)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:23-cv-01892-JST Document 111-1 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 2
Ahmed v. DHS Public Status Report

Table 1: Class Member Asylum Data

Date Range of Data: 2023-07-31 to 2023-11-29

Date Captured as of: 2023-11-29 

Report Published as of: 2023-12-13

Reporting Requirement Number Percent

(i) the total number of Class Member asylum applications received: 19,925 n/a

(ii) the total number of Class Member asylum applications adjudicated: 10,962 n/a

(iii) the total number of Class Member asylum applications that have been granted: 10,669 n/a

(iv) the total number of Class Member asylum applications that have been denied: 24 n/a

(v) the total number of Class Member asylum applications that have been administratively

closed: 269 n/a

(vi) the total number of Class Member asylum applications that have been referred to

immigration court for defensive removal proceedings: 0 n/a

(vii) the total number and percentage of Class Member asylum applications that are pending: 8,963 45.0

(viii) the total number of Class Member asylum applications that have been pending more than

150 days, and the total percentage compared to overall Class Member asylum applications: 7,265 36.5

(ix) For adjudicated Class Member asylum applications, the average adjudication time (in days)

from filing to completion: 304 n/a

(x) For pending Class Member asylum applications, the average number of days from filing that

those cases have been pending: 291 n/a

Table 1 Notes:

1) The report reflects the most up-to-date data available at the time the system was queried.

2) Adjudicated is defined as the date a grant, denial or referral is served upon the applicant or the date of the administrative

close. Reopened cases are excluded.

3) Processing time is represented by the elapsed number of calendar days between date of filing and date of decision service,

date of administrative close, or date of data extract if the application is still pending.

Parameters:

Form: I-589

Special Group Code: OAW

Data Source: eCISCOR GLOBAL / Asylum Division - IDEA Branch

Case 4:23-cv-01892-JST Document 111-1 Filed 12/13/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5872 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5872

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
   To provide adequate commitment authority for fiscal year 2010 for 
 guaranteed loans that are obligations of the General and Special Risk 
   Insurance Funds of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``General and Special Risk Insurance 
Funds Availability Act of 2010''.
SEC. 2. ADEQUATE COMMITMENT AUTHORITY.
    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for fiscal year 2010 
the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may enter into 
commitments to guarantee loans, as authorized by sections 238 and 519 
of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-3 and 1735c), in an amount 
not exceeding $20,000,000,000 in total loan principal, any part of 
which is to be guaranteed.
SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.
    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129735 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129735 

 COA: 263706 

Ottawa CC: 04-028096-FC 

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN MIKLUSICAK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

s1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-8-2007

USA v. Stevens

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-2497

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Stevens" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1041.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1041
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 05-2497

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ROBERT J. STEVENS,

 Appellant

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

D.C. Civil Action No. 04-cr-00051

(Honorable Alan N. Bloch)

Present: SCIRICA, Chief Judge,

SLOVITER, McKEE, RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES,

SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN and COWEN, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above

appeal, it is ordered that the Clerk of this Court list the above case for rehearing en banc

at the convenience of the Court.

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Anthony J. Scirica

Chief Judge

Dated: May 8, 2007

CMD/cc: Karen S. Gerlach, Esq.

 Robert L. Eberhardt, Esq.

 Laura S. Irwin, Esq.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,142
<SECURITIES>                                    20,598
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,179
<INVENTORY>                                        200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,735
<PP&E>                                           8,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,313
<OTHER-SE>                                       (179)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,008
<SALES>                                         18,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,002
<CGS>                                            3,473
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
# Interagency Strategy for Promoting Naturalization

Throughout our history, the United States has welcomed immigrants from all over the world who have helped shape and define our country. Granting citizenship to eligible lawful permanent residents is vital to our nation’s security, economic prosperity, and a future built on the principles of the U.S. Constitution.

In keeping with Executive Order on Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans (E.O. 14012), USCIS is chairing a Naturalization Working Group that includes the:
                - U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
                - U.S. Department of Agriculture;
                - U.S. Department of Defense;
                - U.S. Department of Education;
                - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;
                - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development;
                - U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service
                - U.S. Department of Justice;
                - U.S. Department of Labor;
                - U.S. Department of State;
                - U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs;
                - U.S. Small Business Administration;
                - U.S. Social Security Administration;
                - The Institute of Museum and Library Services; 
                - The National Endowment for the Arts;
                - The National Endowment for the Humanities.

The Naturalization Working Group plans to implement a national strategy to promote naturalization. Read the full report (PDF, 3.77 MB). USCIS is committed to empowering immigrants to pursue citizenship and the rights and opportunities available to them as they embark on their journey.

USCIS has taken a number of steps to reduce barriers to naturalization in our nation's legal immigration system.

**Additional Resources**
                - Interagency Strategy for Promoting Naturalization (PDF, 3.77 MB)
                - Naturalization Working Group Progress Report (PDF, 2.2 MB)
                - First Anniversary Accomplishment Highlights (PDF, 1.79 MB)
                - Second Anniversary Accomplishment Highlights (PDF, 3.76 MB)
                - USCIS Naturalization Policies Fact Sheet (PDF, 1.15 MB)
                - USCIS Celebrates Citizenship Day 2021 (PDF, 1.45 MB)
                - USCIS Celebrates Citizenship Day 2022 (PDF, 599.9 KB)
                - USCIS Celebrates Citizenship Day 2023 (PDF, 682.73 KB)

09/15/2023

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50210

Summary Calendar

 

SHERRY KING,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CV-1281

- - - - - - - - - -

December 23, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sherry King appeals from the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of her application for supplemental security

income. She argues that the administrative law judge failed to

consider her ability to maintain employment and “failed to give

proper weight to the testimony of the vocational expert (VE),

that in his opinion, the Appellant would not be able to maintain

employment should she return to her past relevant work.” King 
No. 98-50210

-2-

argues that because of this error, the Commissioner’s decision is

not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed.

King argument lacks a factual basis. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment

is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John B. Zumwalt, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




December 19, 2002



By:

/s/John B. Zumwalt, IIIJohn B. Zumwalt, III Vice
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer