alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6523-4]


Request for Great Lakes Preproposals Through ``FY2000-2001 Great 
Lakes Priorities and Funding Guidance''

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of funding availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA's Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) is now 
requesting the submission of preproposals for GLNPO funding. This 
request is part of the FY2000-2001 Great Lakes Priorities and Funding 
Guidance (Funding Guidance). The Great Lakes Funding Guidance 
identifies Great Lakes priorities and solicits preproposals for 
assistance projects in the areas of contaminated sediments, pollution 
prevention and reduction, habitat protection and restoration, invasive 
species, and emerging issues.

DATES: The deadline for submission of Preproposals is February 18, 
2000.

ADDRESSES: The Funding Guidance is available on the Internet at <a href="http://
www.epa.gov/glnpo/fund/2000guid/">http://
www.epa.gov/glnpo/fund/2000guid/</a>. Preproposals can also be sent to 
Lawrence Brail, Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes National 
Program Office (G-17J), 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604; 
telephone (312) 886-7474; email address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e1839380888dcf8d809693848f8284a1849180cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="680a1a0901044604091f1a0d060b0d280d1809460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Russ, EPA-GLNPO, G-17J, 77 West 
Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604 (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#deedefecf3e6e6e8f3eaeeefedf1acabadadf0b3b7bdb6bfbbb29ebbaebff0b9b1a8">312-886-4013/<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cdbfb8bebee3a0a4aea5aca8a18da8bdace3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USEPA's Great Lakes National Program Office 
is requesting Preproposals for Great Lakes projects addressing: 
Contaminated Sediments ($1.45 million), Pollution Prevention and 
Reduction--Binational Toxics Strategy ($700 thousand); Habitat 
(Ecological) Protection and Restoration ($700 thousand); Invasive 
Species ($300 thousand); and Emerging Issues ($220 thousand). A total 
of $3.04 million is targeted for awards in the Summer and Fall of 2000. 
Potential applicants can find a description of GLNPO's funding process, 
the Request for Preproposals, evaluation criteria, and the Preproposal 
development and submittal program on the Internet at <a href="http://
www.epa.gov/glnpo/fund/2000guid/">http://
www.epa.gov/glnpo/fund/2000guid/</a>.

    Dated: January 6, 2000.
Gary V. Gulezian,
Director, Great Lakes National Program Office.
[FR Doc. 00-958 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Hamilton *v.*Gibbs *et al.*

(City *Court of New York, Special Term.*

January 22, 1890.)

Pleading—Verification—Prior Pleading Verified.

On the service of a copy of the complaint on him, defendant admitted due service of the complaint. The complaint was properly verified, but the copy served on defendant was not. Defendant then served an unverified answer, and, on its return for want of verification, notified plaintiff that the copy of the complaint served on him was not verified, but declined to allow plaintiff to correct the copy, whereupon plaintiff served a true copy of the complaint. *Meld,*that defendant would be required to file a verified answer.

Action by Archibald W. Hamilton against Bichard H. Gibbs and Walter G. Murphy on an account stated. A copy of the complaint was served on defendants, who then admitted, due service of the complaint. The complaint was duly verified, but the copy which was served on defendants was defective as to the verification. Defendants served an answer, which was returned to them because it was not verified. Defendants then notified plaintiff that the copy of the complaint which was served on them was not verified. Plaintiff then requested defendants to allow a correction of the copy of the complaint, but defendants refused to allow it. Plaintiff then served a true copy of the complaint, and he now moves for judgment as for failure to answer.

*Ely &*Walker, *(James*S. *Ely,*of counsel,) for plaintiff. *J. D. Hallen,*for defendants.

Van Wyck, J.

Motion granted, unless within six days the attorney for defendant Gibbs serves the verified answer of said defendant.
Exhibit 10.3

 

 

** **

** **

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AUDITORS**

** **

To the shareholders of:

**KEDDEM BIOSCIENCE LTD.**

 

We have audited the balance sheets of KeddemBioscience Ltd. an Israeli corporation in the development stage (hereafter-the "Company") as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the relatedstatements of operations, changes in shareholders` equity (capital deficiency)and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from August 1, 2004(date of commencement of operation) to December 31, 2006. These financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company`s Board of Directors andmanagement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financialstatements based on our audit.

 

Weconducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whetherthe financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesexamining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures inthe financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accountingprinciples used and significant estimates made by the Company`s Board ofDirectors and management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statementpresentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for ouropinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred toabove present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of theCompany as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of itsoperations, changes in shareholders` equity (capital deficiency) and its cashflows for the years then ended and for the period from August 1,2004 (date of commencementof operation) to December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying financial statements havebeen prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  Asdiscussed in Note 1a(1). to the financial statements, the Company has sufferedrecurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raisesubstantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management'splans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1a(1).  Thefinancial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from theoutcome of this uncertainty.

 

 

 

Tel-Aviv, Israel

January 24, 2007

** **

**__1__**
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 10, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00038

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF RAMIRO AGUILAR JR., DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PC

- 2800

H onorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant's motion for rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s et my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gene Logic Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
Mark D. Gessler, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Philip L.
Rohrer, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|    |  |                                                           |  |     |  |                                                                
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Mark D. Gessler                                       |  | By: |  | /s/ Philip L. Rohrer, Jr.                                      
|    |  |                                                           |  |     |  |                                                                
|    |  | Mark D. Gessler
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002 |  |     |  | Philip L. Rohrer, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,

Complainant,

vs.

TRAVION CALEB SANDERLIN,

Respondent.

Docket Number 2023-0387

Enforcement Activity No. 7799084

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On November 2, 2023, the parties in this case submitted a Motion for Approval of a 

Settlement Agreement and Entry of Consent Order to be approved as a settlement of the case 

under 33 C.F.R. § 20.502. After carefully reviewing the terms of the Settlement Agreement, I

find that it is fair, reasonable, and in substantial compliance with the requirements of 33 C.F.R. 

§ 20.502.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the record, it is hereby ORDERED the Settlement Agreement is 

APPROVED in full and incorporated herein by reference. This Consent Order shall constitute 

full, final, and complete adjudication of this proceeding.

Done and dated this 8th day of January 2024, at 

Houston, Texas

______________________________

HON. TOMMY CANTRELL

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
(9 Misc. Rep. 203.)

#### HAWES v. FOOTE.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

June 20, 1894.)

Pleading—Bill or Particulars.

In an action on an alleged contract to pay 10 per cent, of the amount received by defendant on certain life insurance policies, plaintiff will not be required to furnish a bill of particulars, as the facts as to the making of the contract and the collection of the money are within defendant’s knowledge.

Appeal from special term.

Action by Charles H. Hawes against Mary A. O. Foote. From an order requiring a bill of particulars, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before HEWBURGER and COHLAH, JJ.

Alexander Melhado, for appellant.

William Blaikie, for respondent.

NEWBURGER, J.

This action is brought- to recover under an alleged special agreement, whereby defendant was to pay plaintiff 10 per cent, of the amount of all moneys received by her under certain life insurance policies issued in her favor. Ho answer has, as yet, been interposed. An order was entered herein, requiring plaintiff to furnish the defendant with a bill of particulars of the services rendered by the plaintiff, and from such order this appeal has been taken.

This action is on a contract to recover 10 per cent., and not on a quantum meruit. The defendant ought to know whether she made a contract to pay the plaintiff 10 per cent, on all moneys collected by her on insurance, and how much she .collected on such policies. The facts are peculiarly within the knowledge of the defendant, and plaintiff ought not to be required to furnish a bill of particulars. The order appealed from must be reversed, with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DELAWARE COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ §

RETIREMENT FUND and CITY OF § No. 199, 2015

STERLING HEIGHTS GENERAL §

EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT § Court Below:

SYSTEM, derivatively and on behalf of §

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., § Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, §

§ C.A. No. 10249-VCL

 v. §

§

MELVYN E. BERGSTEIN, LARRY C. §

GLASSCOCK, KAREN N. HORN, §

ALLAN HUBBARD, REUBEN S. §

LEIBOWITZ, DANIEL C. SMITH, §

J. ALBERT SMITH, JR., HERBERT §

SIMON, DAVID SIMON, and §

RICHARD S. SOKOLOV, §

§

Defendants Below, Appellees, §

§

 and §

§

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., §

§

Nominal Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: October 28, 2015

Decided: December 16, 2015

Before HOLLAND, VALIHURA, and VAUGHN, Justices; WALLACE and WELCH

Judges,



constituting the Court en Banc.

 



Sitting by designation pursuant to Del. Const. Art. IV § 12.
O R D E R

This 16th day of December 2015, the Court, having considered this matter on the 

briefs and oral arguments of the parties, has concluded that the same should be affirmed 

solely on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery’s analysis 

under Aronson v. Lewis1in its March 27, 2015 bench ruling and Order, and its conclusion 

that six of Simon Property Group, Inc.’s ten directors were disinterested and 

independent.

2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court 

of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice

 

1

473 A.2d 805 (Del. 1984).

2 We note that the Court of Chancery made this finding during the course of its analysis under 

Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927 (Del. 1993), but it applies with respect to its Aronson analysis, 

as well. See Op. Br. Ex. A. at Tr. 73:14-17 (“The discussion we just went through does the vast 

majority of the work for the analysis under Aronson, not surprisingly, since Aronson is a more 

particularized version of the test.”).
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2382 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2382

    To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to 
 authorize a parent to opt their child out of participation in certain 
                  assessments required under such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2015

  Mr. Reed (for himself, Ms. DeLauro, and Mr. Gibson) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to 
 authorize a parent to opt their child out of participation in certain 
                  assessments required under such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enable More Parents to Opt-Out 
Without Endangering Resources Act''.

SEC. 2. ASSESSMENT OPT-OUT FOR CERTAIN STUDENTS.

    Section 1111(b)(2) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C)(iv), by inserting ``subject to 
        subparagraph (L),'' before ``measures the progress'';
            (2) in subparagraph (I)(ii), by inserting ``, and the 95 
        percent requirement described in this clause shall exclude any 
        student who, pursuant to subparagraph (L), opts out of the 
        assessments'' after ``about an individual student''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(L) Opt-out for certain students.--Upon the 
                request of the parent of a student, and for any reason 
                stated by the parent, a State shall allow the student 
                to opt out of the assessments described in paragraph 
                (3). Such an opt-out, or any action related to it, may 
                not be used by the Secretary, the State, any State or 
                local agency, or any school leader or employee as the 
                basis for any corrective action, penalty, or other 
                consequence against the parent, the student, any school 
                leader or employee, or the school.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1


        Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


March 31, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to
be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not
constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") accompanying
this certification.

     A. W. Bergeron, the President and Michael Romaniw, the Chief Financial
Officer of AES Red Oak, L.L.C., each certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

          1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of AES Red Oak, L.L.C.


                                                    /s/ A.W. Bergeron
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Name: A.W. Bergeron
                                                    President


                                                    /s/ Michael Romaniw
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Name: Michael Romaniw
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AES Red Oak, L.L.C. and will be retained by AES Red Oak, L.L.C. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w9wa






Exhibit 10.9(a)



June 9, 2009

Aspect Capital Ltd.

Nations House — 8th Floor

103 Wigmore Street

London W1U 1QS, U.K.



Attention: Mr. Anthony Todd




     Re: Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Todd:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2010 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



Very truly yours,



CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	ASPECT CAPITAL LTD.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Simon Rockall	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Print Name: Simon Rockall	 	 






JM/sr
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 20984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9827]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicant

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for licenses as 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary Applicants

Nextrans International, Inc., 1225 W. 190th Street, Suite 310, Gardena, 
CA 90248, Officers: John A. Kamischke, President (Qualifying 
Individual), Roy W. Cheong, Secretary
Transcon Shipping Co., Inc., 2157 Center Ave., Unit #4, Fort Lee, NJ 
07024, Officers: Terrence P. Lynch, President (Qualifying Individual), 
Wai Wong, Vice President
Galaxy Shipping Company, Inc., 314 Whites Landing, Long Beach, CA 
90803, Officers: Eliane Tiharu Susaki, Secretary (Qualifying 
Individual), Les Atterbury III, President
MTL Worldwide Agency, Inc., 228 51st Street, Brooklyn, NY 11220, 
Officer: Aleksandr Solovyev, President (Qualifying Individual)
Trans Orient Express LLC, 2625 Athena Place, Fullerton, CA 92833, 
Officers: Edward Chang, Chief Operating Officer (Qualifying 
Individual), Jia He Bai, President

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Transunion America, Inc., 66-00 Long Island Expressway, Suite 200, 
Maspeth, NY 11378, Officers: Brigid Gatti, Secretary, Geri S. Alex, 
Import and Export Manager (Qualifying Individuals), Jose Viano, 
President

Ocean Freight Forwarders--Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants

Cardel International Shipping Corp., 405 North 61st Avenue, Hollywood, 
FL 33024, Officer: Carmen Delgado, President (Qualifying Individual)

    Dated: April 14, 2000.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-9827 Filed 4-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```