alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report of Secured Data,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof,  I, Sanding Tao, Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 15, 2005

/s/ Sanding Tao
------------------------
Sanding Tao
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6118 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6118

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, in Washington, D.C., as the ``Dorothy I. 
                         Height Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOROTHY I. HEIGHT POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, in Washington, D.C., shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dorothy I. Height Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dorothy I. 
Height Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30 
      (legislative day September 29), 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6118

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, in Washington, D.C., as the ``Dorothy I. 
                         Height Post Office''.
```
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-78,944-03

EX P ARTE REGINALD WAYNE EMERSON, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. F 89-91792-N INTHE 195 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Ap p l icant was convicted of burg lary of a vehicle a nd sentenc ed to 35 year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends, in rele vant part, that the September 18, 2018, parole revoc ation hearing violated due process, and that he wa s denied his right to counsel. Ba sed on materials provided by the Texas Depa

rtment of Criminal J ustice, Pardons and Paroles Division, and the Classification and Records Depa

rtment, the trial court deter mined that, under the unique fac ts of this case , fundame ntal fairnes s re qu i red that Applicant be provided with counsel. Acc ording ly , the revoc ation of2

Applicant’s parole violated due proce ss. The trial court also found insufficient evidenc e of the two alleg ed violations that resulted in re vocation. The court recommends that Applicant be reinstated to parole and that any collater al conseque nces, such as forf eiture of time cre dits due to the improper

revoc ation, be re moved. The trial court’s deter

mination that the rec ord shows a due proce ss violation is supported by the rec ord. Relief should be g ran ted. The Pardons and Paroles Division shall either reinstate Applicant to parole or reope n the revoc ation proce eding s. Applicant’s rema ining claims lack merit and ar e denie d. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Dep a r tm e nt o f Crim in a l Ju s tic e–Corre ctional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Dec ember

11, 2019 Do not publish
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

 

I, Forrest Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of IWTTesoro Corporation (the “Registrant”), does hereby certify in accordance with18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(3)           the Annual report on Form 10-KSB/A ofthe Registrant, to which this certificate is attached as an exhibit (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m), as amended; and

 

(4)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| September 23,  2004 | /s/ Forrest  Jordan      |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                     | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
SUMMER BOATING SEASON AND “UNDER THE INFLUENCE”

Written by Danielle Davis

It is that time of the year when we begin to see a rise in the number of alcohol 

related boating violations. Boating “under the influence” is a violation of 46 USC 

2302(c). Coast Guard boarding teams may conduct Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs), 

obtain breathalyzer readings, and observe the overall behavior and appearance of a 

mariner to make a determination whether the mariner is under the influence of 

alcohol or a dangerous drug. Frequently, one or more of these tests are done by local 

authorities. Anyone operating a vessel while found to be “under the influence” may 

be charged with this violation and be subject to a civil penalty. 

Copies of the FSTs with all of the blocks completed in a readable manner and with 

signatures as required, breathalyzer readings obtained by Coast Guard and local 

authorities, documented observations of behavior and appearance, and a narrative of 

the events of the boarding help to determine and support that a violation occurred. 

Additionally, if the mariner refuses a breathalyzer test, the circumstances of the 

offer and refusal of the test should be documented. 33 CFR 95.040 provides that a 

refusal creates a presumption of intoxication. 33 CFR 95.030 makes either personal 

observations or a chemical test sufficient to form a basis for a charge that the 

mariner is boating “under the influence.”

Boating “under the influence” is a serious violation. Mariners have a responsibility 

to avoid boating “under the influence.” Boarding teams have a responsibility to 

properly and accurately record the events, FSTs, breathalyzer readings or refusal of 

breathalyzer testing when alleging that a mariner has been boating under the 

influence.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      350
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,020
<PP&E>                                             506
<DEPRECIATION>                                      32
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,852
<SALES>                                          3,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,675
<CGS>                                            2,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,452)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,452)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

(18 U.S.C. 1350) 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaDel Pharma Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Steven B. Ratoff, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael E. Spicer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date:  August 7, 2008 | By:    | /s/ STEVEN B. RATOFF                          |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Steven B. Ratoff                              |
|                  |   | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |   |                                          |
| Date:  August 7, 2008 | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL E. SPICER                         |
|                  |   | Michael E. Spicer                             |
|                  |   | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer    |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         173
<SECURITIES>                                   451
<RECEIVABLES>                                  40,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,296
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               70,180
<PP&E>                                         58,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          51,428
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6
<OTHER-SE>                                     49,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,306
<SALES>                                        262,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,525
<CGS>                                          138,788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                   589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            10,490
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,490
<EPS-BASIC>                                    5.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  5.62



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Francis Mailhot, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MILLENNIUM CAPITAL
     VENTURE HOLDINGS, INC.(the "Issuer");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Issuer and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuer's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the Issuer's fourth
          fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2003that has materially affected,
          or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuer's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     Issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the Issuer's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Issuer's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Issuer's internal control
          over financial reporting.


By:  /s/    Francis Mailhot
     ----------------------
     Francis Mailhot
     Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 16, 2005
H. R. 5874 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

Making supplemental appropriations for the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the 

following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury 

not otherwise appropriated for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2010, and for other purposes, namely: 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

For an additional amount for ‘‘Salaries and Expenses’’ of the 

United States Patent and Trademark Office, $129,000,000, to 

remain available until expended: Provided, That the sum herein 

appropriated from the general fund shall be reduced as offsetting 

collections assessed and collected pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1113 and 

35 U.S.C. 41 and 376 are received during fiscal year 2010, so 

as to result in a fiscal year 2010 appropriation from the general 

fund estimated at $0: Provided further, That during fiscal year 

2010, should the total amount of offsetting fee collections be less 

than $2,016,000,000, this amount shall be reduced accordingly. 

BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

PERIODIC CENSUSES AND PROGRAMS

Of funds made available under this heading by Public Law 

111–117, $129,000,000 are hereby rescinded. 
H. R. 5874—2 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Patent and Trademark Office Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT
32.1




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sunnyside Acres Mobile Estates (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Hui Ping Cheng, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:






(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.








Date:
April 15, 2010


/s/Hui
      Ping ChengHui
      Ping ChengPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer
              (principal
      executive and financial officer)
#### *In re*Albrecht’s Estate.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.*

May 23, 1890.)

Descent and Distribution—Husband and Wipe—Entireties.

In New York a bond and mortgage executed to ahusband and wife jointly become the property of the wife on the death of the husband, by right of survivorship. The common-law rule is in force in respect to personal property as well as realty. Affirming 4 N. Y. Supp. 462.

Appeal from surrogate’s court, Kew York county.

Accounting by Christian J. Uhl and Charles' H. Hamel as executors of the will of Balthazar Albrecht, deceased. The exceptions to the referee’s report were overruled, and contestant appeals. For opinion of surrogate, see 4 K. Y. Supp. 462.

Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Bartlett and Barrett, JJ.

*Henry F. Lippold,*for appellant. *Samuel Untermyer*and *L. A. Qiegerich*for respondents.

*389Van Brunt, P. J.

The principles laid down in the case of *Sanford*v. *Sanford,*45 N. Y. 723, 58 N. Y. 72, and reiterated in the case of *Bertles*v. *Nunan,*92 N. Y. 156, and which have obtained since the existence of the common law, show that the decree of the surrogate was correct, and should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
---

Exhibit 31





Certifications


SECTION 302





I, Jonathan Ricker, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and





cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.








Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.Date: July 31, 2009
By:
/s/ Jonathan RickerJonathan RickerTitle: Chairman, Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer