Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 77 / Thursday, April 20, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 21139

Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under

19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;

* * * * *

§ 101.3 [Amended]

2. The list of ports in § 101.3(b)(1) is

amended, under the State of Louisiana

in the entry for Gramercy, by removing

in the ‘‘Limits of port’’ column the

words ‘‘(Restated in T.D. 84–126).’’

Dated: April 14, 2000.

Stuart P. Seidel,

Assistant Commissioner, Office of

Regulations and Rulings.

[FR Doc. 00–9868 Filed 4–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4820–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[AAG/A Order No. 196–2000]

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is

exempting a Privacy Act system of

records from subsections (c)(3) and (4);

(d); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5), and (8); and (g)

of the Privacy Act. 5 U.S.C. 552a. This

system of records is maintained by the

Immigration and Naturalization Service

(INS) and is entitled ‘‘Attorney/

Representative Complaint/Petitiion

Files, JUSTICE/INS–022.’’

Information in this system relates to

complaints filed against nonagency

attorneys and/or representatives who

have engaged in unethical or

unprofessional activities. The

exemptions are necessary to avoid

interference during the conduct of

criminal, civil, or administrative actions

or investigations. Specifically, the

exemptions are necessary to prevent

subjects of investigations from

frustrating the investigatory process.

The exemptions are necessary to avoid

interference during the conduct of civil

or administrative actions or

investigations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Cahill—202–307–1823.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

December 16, 1999 (64 FR 70203) a

proposed rule was published in the

Federal Register with an invitation to

comment. No comments were received.

This order relates to individuals

rather than small business entities.

Nevertheless, pursuant to the

requirements of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, it is

hereby stated that the order will not

have ‘‘a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.’’

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16

Administrative Practices and

Procedures, Courts, Freedom of

Information Act, Government in the

Sunshine Act, and the Privacy Act.

Dated: April 5, 2000.

Stephen R. Colgate,

Assistant Attorney General for

Administration.

Pursuant to the authority vested in the

Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 552a and

delegated to me by Attorney General

Order No. 793–78, 28 CFR part 16 is

amended as follows:

PART 16—[AMENDED]

1. The authority for Part 16 continues

to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g),

553; 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510,

534, 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701.

2. 28 CFR 16.99 is amended by adding

paragraphs (k) and (l) to read as follows:

§ 16.99 Exemption of the Immigration and

Naturalization Service Systems-limited

access.

* * * * *

(k) The Attorney/Representative

Complaint/Petition File (JUSTICE/INS–

022) system of records is exempt under

the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2)

from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d);

(e)(1), (2), (3), (5), and (8); and (g); but

only to the extent that this system

contains records within the scope of

subsection (j)(2), and to the extent that

records in this system are subject to

exemption therefrom. In addition, this

system of records is also exempt in part

under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a

(k)(2) from subsections (c)(3); (d); and

(e)(1), but only to the extent that this

system contains records within the

scope of subsection (k)(2), and to the

extent that records in this system are

subject to exemption therefrom.

(l) The following justifications apply

to the exemptions from particular

subsections:

(1) From subsection (c)(3) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(1) of this section.

(2) From subsection (c)(4) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(2) of this section.

(3) From the access and amendment

provisions of subsection (d) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(3) of this section.

(4) From subsection (e)(1) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(4) of this section.

(5) From subsection (e)(2) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(5) of this section.

(6) From subsection (e)(3) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(6) of this section.

(7) From subsection (e)(5) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(7) of this section.

(8) From subsection (e)(8) for reasons

stated in paragraph (h)(8) of this section.

(9) From subsection (g) to the extent

that the system is exempt from the

access and amendment provisions of

subsection (d).

[FR Doc. 00–9744 Filed 4–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–CJ–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[AAG/A Order No. 197–2000]

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is

exempting a Privacy Act system of

records from subsections (c)(3) and (4);

(d); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5), and (8); and (g)

of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a. This

system of records is maintained by the

Immigration and Naturalization Service

(INS) and is entitled ‘‘Worksite

Enforcement Activity Record and Index

(LYNX), JUSTICE/INS–025.’’

Information in this system relates to

an enforcement inspection or

investigation pursued under the

Immigration and Nationality Act,

Section 274A(e), involving a specific

individual employer. The exemptions

are necessary to avoid interference

during the conduct of criminal, civil, or

administrative actions or investigations.

Specifically, the exemptions are

necessary to prevent subjects of

investigations from frustrating the

investigatory process. The exemptions

are necessary to avoid interference

during the conduct of civil or

administrative actions or investigations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Cahill—202–307–1823.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

December 16, 1999 (64 FR 70202) a

proposed rule was published in the

Federal Register with an invitation to

comment. No comments were received.

This order relates to individuals

rather than small business entities.

Nevertheless, pursuant to the

requirements of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, it is

hereby stated that the order will not

have ‘‘a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.’’

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16

Administrative Practices and

Procedures, Courts, Freedom of