alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 **STATEMENT
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
        Eric
        Young, Chief Financial Officer of Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. (the
        "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (a)
        The
        Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A Amendment No. 1 of the Company for the year
        ended
        December 31, 2004, to which this certification accompanies (the "Annual
        Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (b)
        The
        information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: *December
                23, 2005*
              By:
              /s/ *Eric
                Young,**Eric
                Young,**Chief
                Financial Officer*
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. and
        will
        be retained by Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PD-0477-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 5/26/2015 5:30:38 PM

Accepted 5/28/2015 2:35:56 PM

No. PD-0477-15 ABELAp?!IJ

In the

Court of Criminal Appeals

At Austin

-♦- ^CdsZ^

No. 01-13-00991-CR *+0 U'^ - I 'V

In the

Court of Appeals

for the

First District ofTexas

at Houston

No. 1315240

In the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

JOSE FRANCO CAMPUZANO

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

c

APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

May 28, 2015

ABELACOSTAt CLERK
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

APPELLANT, pursuant to Tex. R. APP. P. 68.2(c) moves for an extension of

time within which to file its petition for discretionary review. In support of its

motion, appellant submits the following:

1. Appellant was charged with the felony offense ofintoxication assault.

2. A jury convicted appellant of the charged offenses and sentenced him to

5 years community supervision on October 15, 2013.

3. A unanimous panel of the First Court of Appeals rendered judgment in

an unpublished opinion on March 26, 2015, affirming appellant's

conviction and sentence.

4. After one extension was granted, appellant's petition for discretionary

review is due on May 26, 2015.

5. Appellant seeks a short extension, in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P.

68.2(c), untilJune 2, 2015, to file its petition for discretionary review.

6. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for the

requested extension:

a. Counsel has been delayed in completing the petition due to the

recent flooding in the Houston area on May 24, 2015. High water

resulted in school closures, as well as counsel's inability to travel into

the city to her office to complete the petition.

b. Appellant's petition is not for purposes of delay, but so that justice may

be done.
WHEREFORE, the Appellant prays that this Court will grant the requested

extension until June 2, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Mandy Miller

Attorney for appellant

2910 Commercial Center Blvd., Ste. 103-201

Katy, TX 77494

SBN 24055561

PHONE (832) 900-9884

FAX (877) 904-6846

mandy@mandymiUerlegal.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to TEX. R. App. P. 9.5, this certifies that on May 25, 2015, a copy of

the foregoing was delivered to the following addresses:

Melissa Hervey

Harris County District Attorney's Office

hervey melissa@dao.hctx.net

Lisa McMinn

State Prosecuting Attorney

lisa.mcminn.@spa.state.tx.us

/s/Mandy Miller
#### Sharp *v.*The State.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Jefferson.

Tried before the Hon. Samuel E. Greene.

D. B. Anderson, for appellant.

Charles G. Brown, Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of carnal knowledge of a girl under ten years of age; and was sentenced to the penitentiary for twenty-five years. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
#               AR-11, Alien’s Change of Address Card

All noncitizens in the United States must report a change of address to USCIS within 10 days (except A and G visa holders and visa waiver visitors) of moving. Timely reporting a change of address also helps to ensure that we mail important notices and documents to the right place.

You can change your address with USCIS through your online account or by filing a paper AR-11, Alien’s Change of Address Card. You can find detailed information about how to change an address on the How to Change Your Address page.

## Forms and Document Downloads

AR-11, Alien’s Change of Address Card  (PDF, 284.85 KB)

## Form Details

11/02/22. We will also accept the 08/31/21 edition. You can find the edition date at the bottom of the page on the form and instructions.

Dates are listed in mm/dd/yy format.

If you complete and print this form to mail it, make sure that the form edition date and page numbers are visible at the bottom of all pages and that all pages are from the same form edition. If any of the form’s pages are missing or are from a different form edition, we may reject your form.

If you need help downloading and printing forms, read our instructions. 

If you have a previously filed, pending, or approved benefit request as a Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioner (including if you previously filed a Form I-751 Abuse Waiver based on battery or extreme cruelty), or for T or U nonimmigrant status, please follow the instructions on our Change of Address Procedures for VAWA/T/U Cases and Form I-751 Abuse Waivers webpage. Otherwise, refer to Form AR-11 for the mailing address. **Do not submit any other forms or fees to this address.**

You can find the filing fee for Form AR-11 by visiting our Fee Schedule page.  

**Filing Tips:** Review our Tips for Filing Forms by Mail page for information on how to ensure we will accept your form.

**Don’t forget to sign your form.**We will reject any unsigned form.

                      - How to Change Your Address
                      - Change of Address Procedures for VAWA/T/U Cases and Form I-751 Abuse Waivers

04/03/2024

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
ex10-1.htm


    Exhibit 10.1

     


    
      
        	
                  Exobox
      Technologies

                    Security
      Beyond the EnterpriseTM

              	
                2121
      Sage Road, Suite 200

                Houston,
      Texas 77056

                Phone  713.625.7800

                Fax  713.625.7890

              


      

    

    April 3,
2010

    


    Mr.
Michael S. Studdard, Chairman

    Mr. Floyd
H. Griffith, Director

    Mr.
Michael G. Wirtz, Secretary

    Exobox
Technologies Corp.

    2121  Sage
Road, Suite 200

    Houston,
Texas 77056

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    I was
brought into Exobox on November 1, 2009 for two main purposes, namely, to
revitalize the company and its shareholders and to raise sufficient capital to
operate the company in order to build enterprise value.

     

    As I
became more involved with the company and doing my own due diligence it became
readily clear to me that the company had significant obstacles to raise the
needed funds particularly based on the legacy issues that existed related to
debt and equity structure.  The acquisition of the oil and gas assets
and related aspects to the deal further complicated our task.

    


    As you
know, I agreed to serve as CEO and a director for six months in attempt to
assist with these specific pressing matters confronting management and the
Board.  However, given the recent positive developments regarding the
issuance of Exobox’s third patent, I believe we accomplished all that we could
for Exobox in these challenging times.  I am disappointed that we were
unable to raise the capital required to develop the Secure Environmentalization
product line despite our best efforts to secure funding.  Accordingly,
I believe the Company no longer needs my continued stewardship as an officer and
member of the Board of Directors.

    


    With this
letter I hereby resign as President, CEO and Director of Exobox Technologies
Corp. effective at 5 p.m. CDT, Saturday, April 3, 2010.  I will
support the Board and Management in all possible ways.  Thank you and
the other officers and directors for your efforts in helping to support me in my
brief tenure.

    


    
      	 
      	
              Sincerely,

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              /s/ Richard J. Kampa

            
	 
      	
              Richard
      J. Kampa
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of **FIRSTBINGO.COM INC.**(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated this 16th day of May, 2006.

 
RICHARD WACHTER 
Richard Wachter 
Chief Financial Officer
# Recent USCAVC Descisions

- 22-1104 Clotilde Velazquez v. Denis McDonough Memorandum Decision that the part of the February 7, 2022, Board decision that denied SMP is SET ASIDE and the matter is REMANDED for readjudication. The remainder of the decision on appeal is AFFIRMED. (GREENBERG)
- 23-1769 Henry Youngs, Jr. v. Denis McDonough ORDERED that the appellant's April 3, 2024, motion is granted, and this case is DISMISSED. (TOTH)
- 23-4685 Jerome F. Alford v. Denis McDonough Memorandum Decision: After considering the foregoing analysis and the parties' briefs, and after reviewing the record, the Court VACATES the part of the Board's June 13, 2023, decision that denied service connection for right ear hearing loss and tin
- 23-6222 Jackie W. Grizzle v. Denis McDonough ORDERED that the joint motion to file a JMPR out of time is granted. Further, it is ORDERED that the April 9, 2024, JMPR is granted. It is further ORDERED that the June 14, 2023, Board decision is SET ASIDE, and the TDIU matter is REMANDED in accorda
- 23-7884 Anthony Smart v. Denis McDonough ORDERED that the Secretary's motion to dismiss this appeal is granted and this appeal is DISMISSED. (GREENBERG)
- 22-250 Eric L. Gunsalus v. Denis McDonough Memorandum Decision that the Board's July 14, 2021, decision is SET ASIDE, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. (BARTLEY)
- 23-672 Patrick W. Behn v. Denis McDonough Memorandum Decision that, the Board's January 4, 2023, decision is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for readjudication. (GREENE)
- 23-81 Max O. Jonas v. Denis McDonough Memorandum Decision that the Court SETS ASIDE the November 29, 2022, Board decision and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings consistent with this decision. (ALLEN)
- 23-6932 Pauline M. Brown v. Denis McDonough ORDERED that the Secretary’s March 7, 2024, motion for leave to transmit the Board decision out of time is granted. The copy of the Board’s April 25, 2023, decision is filed as of the date the Court received it. It is also ORDERED that the stay o
- 22-7427 Jerry Coleman v. Denis McDonough Memorandum Decision that after considering the appellant's and the Secretary's pleadings, and after reviewing the record, the Court AFFIRMS the Board's August 30, 2022, decision. (PIETSCH)
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Brett D. Mayer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Bingham Canyon Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s  internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 27, 2007 /s/ Brett D. Mayer Brett D. Mayer Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Emile J. Jordan certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OraLabs Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Acts Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated May 20, 2004                                 /s/ Emile J. Jordan
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report of Las Palmas Mobile
Estates (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Diana L. Hassan,  President of the Company,  hereby certifies for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 (the  "Exchange  Act") and  Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: March 12, 2007                     By: /s/ DIANA L. HASSAN
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Diana L. Hassan
                                          President and Director



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO LAS PALMAS  MOBILE  ESTATES,  AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY LAS PALMAS MOBILE  ESTATES,  AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42359

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ALEX RANGEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 303

Filed: January 6, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of life, with a minimum 

period of confinement of five years, for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, 

and a unified term of fifteen years with a minimum period of confinement of five 

years for enticement of a child through use of the Internet, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Ted S. Tollefson, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Alex Rangel pled guilty to one count of lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen. Idaho 

Code § 18-1505 and one count of enticement of a child through use of the Internet, I.C. § 15-

1509A. The district court sentenced Rangel to a unified sentence of life with five years 

determinate for lewd conduct and a concurrent sentence of fifteen years with five years 

determinate for enticement of a child. Rangel appeals asserting that the district court abused its 

discretion by imposing excessive sentences.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Rangel’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.