alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-9997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 
897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether 
instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which 
the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being 
manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import 
Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. 
Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 00-007. Applicant: University of Wisconsin-
Milwaukee, 1900 E. Kenwood Boulevard, Room B30, Milwaukee, WI 53211. 
Instrument: Scanning Tunneling Microscope, Model STM 25DH. 
Manufacturer: Omicron Vakuumphysik GmbH, Germany. Intended Use: The 
instrument is intended to be used for the growth of epitaxial 
semiconductors by molecular beam epitaxy technique and characterization 
in situ with variable temperature scanning tunneling microscopy, 
reflection high energy electron diffraction, low energy electron 
diffraction and Auger electron spectroscopy. The ultimate goal of this 
project is to investigate and understand the processes at atomic level 
and to control and manipulate the motion of atoms on surfaces so that 
the more sophisticated device structures can be made. Application 
accepted by Commissioner of Customs: March 24, 2000.

    Docket Number: 00-008. Applicant: University of Delaware Department 
of Chemical Engineering, Colburn Laboratory, 150 Academy Street, 
Newark, DE 19716. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM-2010F. 
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The instrument is 
intended to be used for the study of the microstructure of metals, 
ceramics, semiconductors, superconductors, zeolites, polymers, colloids 
and biomaterials to obtain structural and compositional information on 
the materials. In addition, the instrument will be used for the 
training of faculty, staff and graduate students in the graduate course 
Transmission Electron Microscopy in Materials Science (MASC 823). 
Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 3, 2000.

Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-9997 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
China Energy Savings Technology, Inc.

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement on
Form S-8 of China Energy  Savings  Technology,  Inc. of our report dated January
29, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of China Energy Savings
Technology,  Inc.  as  of  December  31,  2003,  and  the  related  consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive  loss,  changes in stockholder equity
and cashflows for the year ended December 31, 2003.



/s/ Webb & Company, P.A.
--------------------------------
Webb & Company, P.A.
Boynton Beach, FL
June 25, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AZ-910-0777-26-241A] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice announces a meeting and tour of the Arizona Resource Advisory Council (RAC). The meeting will be held on May 11, 2000, at the Sierra Suites Hotel, 391 E. Fry Blvd., located in Sierra Vista, Arizona. It will begin at 9:00 a.m. and will conclude at approximately 4:00 p.m. The agenda items to be covered include the review of the March 31, 2000, meeting minutes; BLM State Director's Update on legislation, regulations, and statewide planning efforts; Update on Wild Horse and Burro Strategic Plan Comments; Video Presentation of Secretary Babbitt's Address on National Landscape Conservation System; Presentation on Wilderness Access/Valid Existing Rights and Recent IBLA Decisions; Update Proposed Field Office Rangeland Resource Teams; Reports from BLM Field Office Managers; Reports by the Standards and Guidelines, Recreation and Public Relations, Wild Horse and Burro Working Groups; Reports from RAC members; and Discussion of future meetings. A public comment period will be provided at 11:00 a.m. on May 11, 2000, for any interested publics who wish to address the Council. On May 12, the RAC will tour the BLM San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area. The tour will highlight some of the issues facing the San Pedro River and the riparian corridor, including                               ( print page 21209)                            recreation, wildlife, water and border issues.                     

# For Further Information Contact:

Deborah Stevens, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2203, (602) 417-9215.

Denise P. Meridith,

Arizona State Director.

[FR Doc. 00-9890 Filed 4-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
EXHIBIT32.01CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER      I, Theresa D. Becks, certify that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 ofThe Campbell Fund Trust fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q for the quarterended September 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of The Campbell Fund Trust.         THE CAMPBELL FUND TRUST    By: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing operator     By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks       Theresa D. Becks      Chief Executive Officer      November 14, 2007  
E 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TOYMAX
INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                       105
<INVENTORY>                                      5,317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,572
<PP&E>                                           7,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,210
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,688
<SALES>                                          8,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,271
<CGS>                                            6,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    81
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,231)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,269)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,269)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, KathyChristopher, certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annualreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:  March 24, 2004 |                           |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|
|                  |                           |
|                  |                           | /s/  Kathy Christopher |   |
|                  | Kathy  Christopher, Controller |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5908 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5908

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
  resource study of Point Peter in St. Marys, Georgia, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2010

 Mr. Kingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
  resource study of Point Peter in St. Marys, Georgia, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Point Peter Study Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to 
as the ``Secretary'') shall conduct a special resource study of Point 
Peter in St. Marys, Georgia, the site of an American fort near 
Cumberland Island that was attacked by British forces in January 1815 
in one of the last battles of the War of 1812.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the area as a unit of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, State, 
        or local governmental entities, or private and nonprofit 
        organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, and local 
        governmental entities and private and nonprofit organizations, 
        and any other interested individuals, including owners of 
        private property located in the study area; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 
        development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance 
        associated with the alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 8 of the National Park Service 
General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-5).
    (d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

(18 U.S.C. 1350) 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaDel Pharma Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Ratoff, Interim President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| Date:  August 12, 2009 | By:    | /s/ STEVEN B. RATOFF                       |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Steven B. Ratoff                           |
|                   |   | Interim President, Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |   | and Interim Chief Financial Officer        |
|                   |   |                                       |
|                   |   |                                       |
|                   |   |                                       |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 98-284

AIDA FELIX, APPELLANT,

 V.

TOGO D. WEST, JR.,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and IVERS and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

On May 31, 2000, the appellant moved to stay proceedings in this matter pending a decision

by the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico on the appellant's action to enforce the Final

Stipulation and Order in the case of Giusti-Bravo v. U.S. Veterans Administration, 853 F.Supp. 34

(D.P.R. 1993). The Secretary has not responded.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that the proceedings in this appeal are stayed until December 29, 2000. See

Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Weaver, 325 F.2d 1010 (D.C. Cir. 1963). It is further

ORDERED that the appellant notify the Secretary and this Court of any action taken in the

U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico on the motion to enforce the terms of the Final

Stipulation and Order before December 29, 2000.

DATED: June 27, 2000 PER CURIAM.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance
Company  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Alan P. Hirmes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Alan P. Hirmes


Alan P. Hirmes
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
(8 Misc. Rep. 424.)

#### McPHERSON v. SCHADE.

(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.

May 7, 1894.)

Specific Performance—Marketable Title.

Specific performance of a contract to purchase land will not be decreed where it appears that the building on the premises encroaches on the adjoining premises, but the encroachment has not existed long enough to give title by adverse possession.

Appeal from equity term.

Action by John B. McPherson against Herman W. Schade for specific performance of a contract. From a decree dismissing the complaint on the merits, and granting defendant affirmative relief, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before SEDGWICK, C. J., and McADAM, J.

J. F. Malcolm and A. Kling, for appellant.

J. F. Miller, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, as the owner of the premises No. 19 Cornelia street, in this city, filed a bill to compel the defendant to specifically perform a contract whereby he agreed to purchase said property from the plaintiff. The refusal to take title was based upon the fact that the walls of the house contracted to be sold encroached upon adjoining lands of other owners, and that the plaintiff could not, on that account, convey the title he had agreed to transmit to the defendant. The trial judge found, upon evidence warranting the conclusion, that the objections made were true, that the encroachments existed, and that the plaintiff could not, therefore, give the defendant a marketable title to the property; and, as a necessary consequence, the plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and the defendant awarded judgment for the return of $1,000 paid by the defendant at the time the contract was executed, and for $889.90, the reasonable expenses of searching the title. The objections to the title were not obviated by any adverse possession which had ripened into a title by prescription, or by anything which disabled the adjoining owners from asserting their claims, and raising the questions determined at the trial. The remedy by specific performance is to a large extent discretionary, and we find no substantial reason for interfering with the disposition made of the case by the learned trial judge. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40773 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RODERICK KENYARDEN TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-CR-59

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roderick Kenyarden Taylor appeals his sentence for misprision of a felony. He argues that he was effectively denied his right to counsel during the presentence interview. This argument is without merit. See United States v. Bounds , 985 F.2d 188, 194 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 135 (1993). Taylor also argues that the district court erred by refusing to adjust his offense level for acceptance of responsibility. In light of the district court's findings -- Taylor denied his criminalNo. 95-40773 -2- involvement during the presentence interview and Taylor understood the interview questioning -- and in light of the deferential standard of review, the district court did not clearly err. See United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 121 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A. E. E. AND G. 

D. E., MINOR CHILDREN,

 

 Appellant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00083-CV

Appeal from the

388th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2015DCM6590)

O R D E R

In order to protect the identity of the minor children who are the subject of this appeal, the 

Court has determined on its own motion that it is necessary to identify the children by their initials, 

A. E. E. and G. D. E., and the parent by initials as well, in all papers submitted to the Court, 

including letters, motions, and briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 9..8. The Court will also refer to the 

children and parent by their initials in correspondence, orders, and in its opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.

Alley, C.J., not participating