alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Alamosa Holdings, Inc. (the"Company") for the fiscal year ended December31, 2004, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, David E.Sharbutt, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ David E. Sharbutt

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Name:    David E.Sharbutt Title:       Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer Date:       March 2, 2005

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

----
Exhibit 32.2



VERTICALNET, INC.

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Gene S. Godick, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Verticalnet, Inc.,
a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), hereby certify to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ GENE S. GODICKGene S. GodickExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 12, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Verticalnet, Inc. and will be retained by Verticalnet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2041

EUGENE ALLEN, Petitioner, versus JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-710-258) Submitted: April 19, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004 Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Michael S. Raab, Colette G. Matzzie, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Eugene Allen, a native and citizen of Sierre Leone, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order affirming the immigration judge’s oral decision denying Allen’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record, the Board’s order, and the immigration judge’s decision and find substantial evidence supports the conclusion that Allen failed to establish the past persecution or well-founded fear of future persecution necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2003) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). We will reverse the Board only if the evidence “‘was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.’” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (quoting Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. at 483-84). We do not find the record so compelling as to reverse the Board. We further find no error in the immigration judge’s application of the law. In addition, we find the Board did not violate Allen’s right to due process. We deny Allen’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- 3 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
c60830_ex10-1.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing











Exhibit 10.1


March 23, 2010


Mr. Ken C. Hicks 

Foot Locker, Inc. 

112 West 34 Street 

New York, NY 10120



Dear Mr. Hicks: 


     Reference is made to the Employment Agreement between us dated June 25, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”).


     Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement provides that the Company shall pay you, no later than April 15, 2010, an annual bonus for 2009 equal to no less than 125 percent of the base salary paid to you by the Company in 2009. You
have advised the Company, and by your signature below confirm, that you have elected to irrevocably waive your entitlement to the cash annual bonus for 2009 referred to in Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement. You also acknowledge that you are
receiving nothing of value in substitution of your entitlement to such cash annual bonus for 2009. 


     Please indicate your agreement by signing and returning the copy of this letter enclosed for that purpose. 

	 	 	Sincerely,  
	 	 	   
	 	 	/s/ Laurie J. Petrucci  
	 	 	Laurie J. Petrucci  
	 	 	Sr. Vice President- Human Resources  
	 	 	   
	AGREED: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Alan D. Feldman          	 	 
	Alan D. Feldman 	 	 
	Chair 	 	 
	Compensation and Management Resources
      Committee 	 	 
	 	 	 
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Ken C. Hicks                	 	 
	Ken C. Hicks 	 	 
	Dated: March 23, 2010 	 	 





Foot Locker, Inc. 112 West 34th Street New York NY 10120 Tel. 212.720.3700
(8 Misc. Rep. 310.)

#### SLATER v. ADLER.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.

May 17, 1894.)

Landlord and Tenant—Liability of Tenants to Each Other.

A tenant of part of a building is liable to a tenant on the floor below for damages caused by water running from a stopcock left open on his premises.

Appeal from eighth district court.

Action by James W. Slater against Ernest N. Adler for damages. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.

Leon Lewin, for appellant.

James F. Higgins, for respondent.

BOOKSTAVER, J.

This action was brought to recover damages caused by the negligence of the appellant or his servants in permitting water to overflow from his premises down and upon and over the stock and machinery of plaintiff’s assignors. From the case, it appears that the appellant occupied the top loft, and respondent’s assignors the loft beneath, at No. 5 Dutch street, in this city, and that on the night of the 30th of November, 1893, certain police officers discovered water running from the appellant’s premises on those of the respondent’s assignors, causing injury to the stock of the latter. Where there are two tenants in occupation of the premises, one being above the other, while it is, true that there is no contractual relation between them, yet each is bound to see to it that no injury shall happen to the other by reason of any negligence on his part. The case shows that there may have been a stopcock on the floor occupied by respondent’s assignors, which could be reached by both them and the appellant, yet the evidence makes it clear that there was also a stopcock on the floor of the appellant’s premises, and that the water which ran on the respondent’s flowed through that stopcock into barrels, from which there was a waste pipe, which probably, for some cause which does not appear, became choked up. This made the appellant liable. Moore v. Goedel, 34 N. Y. 532; Eakin v. Brown, 1 E. D. Smith, 36; Totten v. Phipps, 52 N. Y. 356. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the amendment to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months
ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Glen R. Gamble
                                     Glen R. Gamble
                     President & Chief Executive Officer

November 19, 2004




                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the amendment to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                     /s/ Robert A. Hildebrand
                         Robert A. Hildebrand
                         Chief Financial Officer



November 19, 2004
#### In re Lawrence A. AZURE, Petitioner.

No. 11-1098.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2011.

Decided: April 13, 2011.

Lawrence A. Azure, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence A. Azure petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because of the recent issuance of the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Exhibit 15.2

LOGO

Incorporating the firms of

Alexander & Spencer

and Rosenbergs

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-146265) and Forms F-3 (File Nos. 333-114504 and 333-130632) of ViryaNet Ltd. pertaining of
our report dated July 15, 2011, with respect to the 2010 financial statements of ViryaNet (Pty) Ltd (a wholly-owned subsidiary of ViryaNet Ltd.), to be included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) of ViryaNet Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2010.



|                          
|--------------------------
|Nexia ASR                 
|ABN 16 847 721 257        
|                          
|/s/ George S. Dakis       
|Partner                   
|Audit & Assurance Services
|Melbourne, Australia      
|July 15, 2011             



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----
|value beyond numbers nexia asr abn 16 847 721 257 level 14 / 440 Collins Street Melbourne Australia
3000 telephone +61 3 9608 0100 facsimile +61 3 9670 8325 email theteam@nexiaasr.com.au website www.nexiaasr.com.au |  | LOGO

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 60 

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 

Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 

dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study 

and submit to Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with dyslexia in kindergarten 

through third grade. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Early Detection of 

5 Dyslexia in Children Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 60 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT BY SECRETARY OF EDUCATION 

2 ON IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT OF 

3 CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA IN KINDER4 GARTEN THROUGH THIRD GRADE. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Education, in con6 sultation with the National Academy of Sciences, shall 

7 conduct a study on methods for identifying and treating 

8 children with dyslexia in kindergarten through third 

9 grade. In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall con10 sider— 

11 (1) whether there is a biological basis for dys12 lexia; 

13 (2) whether dyslexia is caused by— 

14 (A) a brain-based phonological deficit that 

15 prevents an individual from breaking down 

16 written words into component sounds; 

17 (B) post-natal experience, including inad18 equate instruction; or 

19 (C) a combination thereof; and 

20 (3) the cost of implementing a program on a 

21 nationwide basis to identify and treat children with 

22 dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade. 

23 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

24 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 60 IH

1 shall prepare and submit to Congress a report containing 

2 the results of the study conducted under subsection (a). 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 573 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the 

marketing of authorized generic drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2009 

Mrs. EMERSON (for herself, Mr. BERRY, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, and Mr. 

WAMP) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

prohibit the marketing of authorized generic drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF AUTHORIZED GENERICS. 

4 Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

5 Act (21 U.S.C. 355) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(w) PROHIBITION OF AUTHORIZED GENERIC

8 DRUGS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

10 provision of this Act, no holder of a new drug appliVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:53 Jan 20, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H573.IH H573

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 573 IH

1 cation approved under subsection (c) shall manufac2 ture, market, sell, or distribute an authorized ge3 neric drug, direct or indirectly, or authorize any 

4 other person to manufacture, market, sell, or dis5 tribute an authorized generic drug. 

6 ‘‘(2) AUTHORIZED GENERIC DRUG.—For pur7 poses of this subsection, the term ‘authorized generic 

8 drug’— 

9 ‘‘(A) means any version of a listed drug 

10 (as such term is used in subsection (j)) that the 

11 holder of the new drug application approved 

12 under subsection (c) for that listed drug seeks 

13 to commence marketing, selling, or distributing, 

14 directly or indirectly, after receipt of a notice 

15 sent pursuant to subsection (j)(2)(B) with re16 spect to that listed drug; and 

17 ‘‘(B) does not include any drug to be mar18 keted, sold, or distributed— 

19 ‘‘(i) by an entity eligible for exclu20 sivity with respect to such drug under sub21 section (j)(5)(B)(iv); or 

22 ‘‘(ii) after expiration or forfeiture of 

23 any exclusivity with respect to such drug 

24 under such subsection (j)(5)(B)(iv).’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PREPARED BY ERNST & YOUNG LLP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                       2,479,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,852,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,786,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,594,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,487,579
<PP&E>                                      60,028,302
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,876,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             201,671,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,941,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,771,316)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               201,671,913
<SALES>                                     73,442,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            73,442,894
<CGS>                                       54,262,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,262,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               647,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,399,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,042,893
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,976,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,066,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,066,252
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 609 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 609

To permit California and other States to effectively control greenhouse 
       gas emissions from motor vehicles, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2009

Mr. Sherman (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit California and other States to effectively control greenhouse 
       gas emissions from motor vehicles, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Right to Clean Vehicles Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF PREEMPTION FOR CALIFORNIA GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION 
              REGULATION FOR VEHICLES.

    Section 209 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7543) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Waiver.--Notwithstanding subsection (b) or any other 
provision of law, the application for a waiver of preemption dated 
December 21, 2005, submitted to the Administrator pursuant to 
subsection (b) by the State of California for the regulation of that 
State to control greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles shall be 
considered to be approved.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                     5,580,032.46       3,628,083.03         0.00        180,571,916.97
A2                    21,298,906.25               0.00         0.00        677,500,000.00
AX                     3,272,534.05               0.00         0.00                  0.00
B                      1,610,542.29               0.00         0.00         50,100,000.00
C                      1,457,407.00               0.00         0.00         44,500,000.00
D                        508,544.76               0.00         0.00         15,300,000.00
E                      1,000,333.43               0.00         0.00         29,100,000.00
F                        477,822.50               0.00         0.00         13,900,000.00
G                        933,937.50               0.00         0.00         30,600,000.00
H                        381,510.40               0.00         0.00         12,500,000.00
J                        299,104.15               0.00         0.00          9,800,000.00
K                        338,781.25               0.00         0.00         11,100,000.00
L                        296,052.10               0.00         0.00          9,700,000.00
M                        256,375.00               0.00         0.00          8,400,000.00
N                        466,817.71               0.00         0.00         15,299,815.00
R                              0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
LR                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
V1                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
V2                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
</TABLE>