alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 7, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00431

- CR

Crystal B. WILLIAMS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2757C

Ho norable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After this court granted its first motion for extension of time, the State’s brief was due

February 3, 2017. The State has now filed a second motion for extension of time, asking for an

additional thirty da ys in which to file its brief. After review, we GRANT the State’s motion and

ORDER the State to file its brief on or before March 6, 2017.

We order the clerk of this court to send a copy of this order to all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of February, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1





                             AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY


                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Skiing Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 25, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Fair, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  June 9, 2004

                                       By:   /s/ William J. Fair
                                          --------------------------------
                                          William J. Fair
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)






         This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Luis Colon, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (James M. Burke, J.), rendered April 23, 2012, after a jury trial, convicting him of assault in the third degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (James M. Burke, J.), rendered April 23, 2012, affirmed.</p><p>The verdict convicting defendant of assault in the third-degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 120.00[1]) was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (<a href="../2007/2007_09814.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342</a>, 348-349 [2007]). Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given to inconsistencies in testimony, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations. The physical injury and intent elements of the assault charge were established by evidence that defendant hit the victim on the face, pulled her down on a bed, which defendant had moved to block the door to prevent the victim from leaving, jumped on top of the victim, stripped her of her pants and underwear, and choked her by the neck as she attempted to yell for help, causing bruises on the victim's face and neck, and scratches on her chest, which felt "pretty painful" and like she was "dying" (<a href="../2013/2013_02170.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Mullings</i>, 105 AD3d 407</a> [2013],<i> lv denied </i>21 NY3d 945 [2013]; <a href="../2009/2009_02825.htm" target="_blank"><i>Matter of Edward H.</i>, 61 AD3d 473</a> [2009]; <a href="../2015/2015_07583.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Flores</i>, 132 AD3d 519</a> [2015]<i>, lv denied </i>26 NY3d 1088 [2015]; <a href="../2016/2016_51574.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Cherkasky</i>, 53 Misc 3d 144</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51574[U][App Term, 1st Dept 2016]).</p><p>Defendant's argument that the unlawful imprisonment charge merged with the assault charge is unpreserved (<a href="../2013/2013_02106.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Hanley</i>, 20 NY3d 601</a>, 606 [2013]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur concur<br>Decision Date: January 27, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6102 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 to extend the authority of the Secretary of 

the Navy to enter into multiyear contracts for F/A– 

18E, F/A–18F, and EA–18G aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6102 EH

1 SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR F/ 

2 A–18E, F/A–18F, AND EA–18G AIRCRAFT. 

3 (a) EXTENSION OF CERTIFICATION.—Paragraph (2) 

4 of section 128(a) of the National Defense Authorization 

5 Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 

6 2217) is amended by striking ‘‘a reference to March’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘a reference to September’’. 

8 (b) REQUIRED AUTHORITY.—Such section 128 is 

9 further amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(e) REQUIRED AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any 

11 other provision of law, with respect to a multiyear contract 

12 entered into under subsection (a), this section shall be 

13 deemed to meet the requirements under subsection (i)(3) 

14 and (l)(3) of section 2306b of title 10, United States 

15 Code.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6102 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act 

aircraft. contracts for F/A–18E, F/A–18F, and EA–18G the Secretary of the Navy to enter into multiyear for Fiscal Year 2010 to extend the authority of
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

MISC. NO. 12-15

IN RE: RECALL OF RETIRED JUDGE

O R D E R

Judge William A. Moorman, having complied with 38 U.S.C. § 7257, is designated a recalleligible retired judge. 

Judge Moorman is recalled for further service in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). 

He is expected to perform substantial service to the Court, as determined by the Chief Judge, during

the period September 1, 2015, until December 31, 2015. 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, effective September 1, 2015, recall-eligible retired Judge William A.

Moorman is recalled to perform service on the Court as determined by the Chief Judge in accordance

with 38 U.S.C. § 7257(b)(1). 

DATED: September 1, 2015 BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence B. Hagel

LAWRENCE B. HAGEL

Chief Judge
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1441** 

CATHY G. LANIER; RANDY D. LANIER , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC; FLEMING & WHITT PA; MCDONNELL & ASSOCIATES PA; DOES 1

- 10, inclusive , Defendants

- Appell ee s .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Margaret B. Seymour , Chief District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00628

- MBS

- SVH )

Submitted : July 10, 2012 Decided: July 24, 2012

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part ; affirmed in part by un published per curiam opinion

. Cathy G. Lanier, Randy D. Lanier, Appellants Pro Se. Steven Barry Licata, Columbia, South Carolina; David Randolph Whitt, FLEMING & WHITT, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cathy G. Lanier and Randy D. Lanier appeal the district court’s order denying the motion fo r a temporary restraining order that they filed in connec tion with their action against the Appellees

. To the extent that the Laniers seek to appeal the district court’s denial of a temporary restraining order, the denial is not appealable on the circumsta nces of this case. See Virginia v. Tenneco , Inc. , 538 F.2d 1026, 1029

- 30 (4th Cir. 1976). To the extent that the Laniers also sought a preliminary injunction, we have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court’s denial of any such request w as not an abuse of its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. , 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008) ; Dewhurst v. Century Aluminum Co. , 649 F.3d 287, 290 (4th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as to the request for a temporary restraining orde r, and otherwise affirm the district court’s judgment. W e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART ; AFFIRMED IN PART
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6102 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6102

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to 
    extend the authority of the Secretary of the Navy to enter into 
     multiyear contracts for F/A-18E, F/A-18F, and EA-18G aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR F/A-18E, F/A-18F, AND 
EA-18G AIRCRAFT.
    (a) Extension of Certification.--Paragraph (2) of section 128(a) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
111-84; 123 Stat. 2217) is amended by striking ``a reference to March'' 
and inserting ``a reference to September''.
    (b) Required Authority.--Such section 128 is further amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Required Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, with respect to a multiyear contract entered into under subsection 
(a), this section shall be deemed to meet the requirements under 
subsection (i)(3) and (l)(3) of section 2306b of title 10, United 
States Code.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.2


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
                 (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, DONALD B. COHEN , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Quantum Group, Inc.
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.


Date:   June 27, 2005

/s/ DONALD B. COHEN
-------------------
DONALD B. COHEN
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 28, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

COLLINS, EDMONDS, PO GORZELSKI, SCHLATHER & TOWER, PLLC

, Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00544

- CV V.

INTERNET MACHINES, L LC, STEVEN C. SEREBO FF, FRANCES P. KNUETTEL, II; INTERN ET MACHINES MC, LLC AND SOCAL IP LAW GROUP, LLP , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on June 3, 2015. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Order filed March 10, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00472

- CV

____________ CURTIS TYLER , Appellant

V.

TORCSILL FOUNDATIONS LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 2020

- 07582



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed January 24, 2022. Our review has determined
that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the motion for summary judgmen t filed by defendants Torcsill Foundations, LLC and Intervale Capital, LLC.The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s

record on or before March 21, 2022 , containing the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant s Torcsill Foundations, LLC and Intervale Capital, LLC

. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Poissant, Wilson.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                                KYLE TINGLE, CPA
                                 P.O. Box 50141
                             Henderson, Nevada 89016
                                 (702) 434-8452
                               (702) 436-4218 fax

To Whom It May Concern:                                           March 28, 2001

The firm of Kyle Tingle, Certified Public Accountant consents to the inclusion
of his report of March 8, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Huile' Oil & Gas,
Inc., as at December 31, 2000, in any filings that are necessary now or in the
future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Kyle Tingle

Kyle Tingle
Certified Public Accountant
# USCIS Extends Green Card Validity Extension to 24 Months for Green Card Renewals

09/28/2022

Effective Sept. 26, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is automatically extending the validity of Permanent Resident Cards (also known as Green Cards) to 24 months for lawful permanent residents who file Form I-90, Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card.

Lawful permanent residents who properly file Form I-90 to renew an expiring or expired Green Card may receive this extension. Form I-90 receipt notices had previously provided a 12-month extension of the validity of a Green Card.

USCIS has updated the language on Form I-90 receipt notices to extend the validity of a Green Card for 24 months for individuals with a newly filed Form I-90. On Sept. 26, USCIS began printing amended receipt notices for individuals with a pending Form I-90.

These receipt notices can be presented with an expired Green Card as evidence of continued status. This extension is expected to help applicants who experience longer processing times, because they will receive proof of lawful permanent resident status as they await their renewed Green Card.

If you no longer have your Green Card and you need evidence of your lawful permanent resident status while waiting to receive your replacement Green Card, you may request an appointment at a USCIS Field Office by contacting the USCIS Contact Center, and we may issue you an Alien Documentation, Identification, and Telecommunications (ADIT) stamp after you file Form I-90.

For more information, visit our Replace Your Green Card page.

If your mailing address changes while your case is pending, please update it through your USCIS Online Account, if you have one.

09/28/2022

0 / 2000To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
#### J. Darrell Boyd, Also Known as Robert Burke, et al., Respondents, v Otsego Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Appellant.

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term correctly denied the motion of defendant, a fire insurance company, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of its insured seeking recovery upon a policy of fire insurance. Defendant’s motion was based upon its affirmative defense that plaintiff had concealed material facts by using a fictitious name in his application for the policy and by failing to reveal the fact that he was a fugitive from justice.

Under the rules applying to forms of insurance other than marine, an applicant is ordinarily permitted to remain silent on matters concerning which he is not questioned. His insurance policy may be voided for concealment only when he conceals matters material to the risk and he does so in bad faith with intent to deceive the insurer *(Stecker v American Home Fire Assur. Co.,*299 NY 1, 5-6; *Sebring v Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co.,*255 NY 382, 385-387; *Lighton v Madison-Onondaga Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*106 AD2d 892). Here there are questions of fact concerning plaintiff’s intent and the materiality of the matters concealed. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ricotta, J. — summary judgment.) Present —Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Vincent C. Klinges, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Logility, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 10, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Vincent C. Klinges 
|                     |  |     |  | Vincent C. Klinges     
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer