Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2001 / Notices 20849

3501 et seq.), the FAA invites public

comment on a new public information

collection which will be submitted to

OMB for approval.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before June 25, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed

or delivered to FAA, at the following

address: Ms. Judy Street, Room 613,

Federal Aviation Administration,

Standards and Information Division,

APF–100, 800 Independence Avenue,

SW., Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

Judy Street, at the above address or on

(202) 267–9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

solicits comments on the following new

collection of information in order to

evaluate the necessity of the collection,

the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of

burden, the quality, utility, and clarity

of the information to be collected, and

possible ways to minimize the burden of

collection. The following is a synopsis

of the information collection activity

which will be submitted to OMB for

review and approval:

The FAA is collecting basic vendor

information such as name, address,

phone number, point of contact,

purpose of request, type of data

requested, and method of acquiring

FAA NAS data. The FAA is collecting

this information in order to assess the

validity of the data requestor. This is a

standardized collection vehicle that will

eliminate confusion among the nine

FAA regions, and allow electronic

tracking of the standard data requested

for trend analysis.

The requestors are primarily vendors

in private industry who have been

contracted by airport authorities to

conduct various studies such as noise

abatement pollution reduction. Other

requestors could be private airport

operators who may have a need to study

various radar tracks to ascertain aircraft

position within their particular airspace.

Typically, the requestor will need an

hour and a half to three hours to fill out

the form, depending upon the amount of

supporting documentation required.

The data requestor is obligated to

respond with the information requested

in order for the FAA to objectively

evaluate the validity of the request.

With growing information security

concerns, all interested parties who

desire access to FAA NAS data must be

able to satisfy the FAA that their need

for the data will not violate current

information security practices.

It is also noted that an agency may not

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not

required to respond to, a collection of

information unless it displays a

currently valid OMB control number.

When assigned by OMB, the

respondents will be notified of the

control number.

Issued in Washington, DC on April 19,

2001.

Steve Hopkins,

Manager, Standards and Information

Division, APF–100.

[FR Doc. 01–10241 Filed 4–24–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–2001–31]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of

Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior

petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption part 11 of Title 14, Code

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this

notice contains a summary of certain

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received. The purpose of this

notice is to improve the public’s

awareness of, and participation in, this

aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities.

Neither publication of this notice nor

the inclusion or omission of information

in the summary is intended to affect the

legal status of any petition or its final

disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Forest Rawls (202) 267–8033, Sandy

Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–8029, or

Vanessa Wilkins (202) 267–8029 Office

of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal

Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591.

This notice is published pursuant to

§§ 11.85 and 11.91.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 18,

2001.

Gary A. Michel,

Acting, Assistant Chief Counsel for

Regulations.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9161.

Petitioner: Mid America Aviation, Inc.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Mid America to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

7485.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9159

(formerly Docket No. 28933).

Petitioner: Omniflight Helicopters,

Inc.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Omniflight to

operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

6653B.

Docket No.: FAA–2000–8463

(formerly Docket No. 29515).

Petitioner: Peninsula Airways, Inc.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 91.323(b)(4).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit PenAir to operate

two Grumman Goose G–21A aircraft

(Registration Nos. N641 and N22932) at

a maximum weight of 8,920 pounds.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

6963A.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8762

(formerly Docket No. 26599).

Petitioner: Regional Airline

Association.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 91.203.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit RAA-member

airlines to temporarily operate certain

U.S.-registered aircraft in domestic

airline operations without the

certificates of airworthiness or

registration on broad the aircraft.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

5515E.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9316.

Petitioner: TWA Airlines LLC., and

American Airlines, Inc.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR part 121, appendix I.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit employees

performing safety sensitive functions for

Trans World Airlines, Inc., to perform

identical functions for TWA LLC

without being subject to additional preemployment drug testing.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

7480.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9350.

Petitioner: TWA Airlines, LLC.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit a qualified and

authorized check airmen, in lieu of an

FAA inspector, to observe a qualifying

pilot in command who is completing

initial or upgrade training specified in

§ 121.424 during at least one flight leg

that includes one takeoff and one

landing.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

7479.

20850 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2001 / Notices

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9351.

Petitioner: TWA Airlines, LLC.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 145.45(f).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow TWA LLC to make

available one copy of its inspection

procedures manual to its supervisory

and inspection personnel, rather than

giving a copy of the manual to each of

these individuals.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

7484.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9349.

Petitioner: TWA Airlines, LLC.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 121.433(c)(1)(iii), 121.441(a)(1) and

(b)(1), and appendix F to part 121.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit TWA Airlines,

LLC., to combine recurrent flight and

ground training and proficiency checks

for TWA LLC’s flight crew members in

a single annual training and proficiency

evaluation program.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

7481.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8468

(formerly /Docket No. 28807).

Petitioner: Yankee Air Force, Inc.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 91.315, 119.5(g), and 119.21(a).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit YAF to operate

its former military Boeing B–17G

aircraft (Registration No. N3193G, Serial

No. 77255), which has a limited

category airworthiness certificate, for

the purpose of carrying passengers on

local flights in return for receiving

donations.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

6631B.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8262.

Petitioner: Airbus Industrie.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 25.785(h)(2), 25.807(d)(7), and

25.813(e).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit the installation

of flight attendant seats that do not

provide direct view of the cabin, to

exceed a distance of 60′ between

adjacent exits, and to allow installation

of interior doors between passenger

compartments, provided the airplane is

not operated for hire, nor offered for

common carriage.

Partial Grant, 04/09/2001, Exemption

No. 7489.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8222.

Petitioner: Mesa Airlines, Inc.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Mesa to

substitute a qualified and authorized

check airman in place of an FAA

inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in

command who is completing initial or

upgrade training specified in § 121.424

during at least one flight leg that

includes a takeoff and a landing.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

7495.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8740.

Petitioner: Hospital AirTransport,

Inc., dba Helicopter AirTransport, Inc.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 133.45(e)(1).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit HATI to conduct

Class D rotorcraft-load combination

operations with an A109E helicopter

certificated in the normal category

under 14 CFR part 27.

Grant, 04/06/2001, Exemption No.

7486.

[FR Doc. 01–10000 Filed 4–24–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Impose and Use the Revenue From

a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Modesto City—County—Harry Sham

Field, Modesto, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Rule on

Application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to impose and use the

revenue from a PFC at Modesto City—

County—Harry Sham Field under the

provisions of the Aviation Safety and

Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title

IX of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Public Law

101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before May 25, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate to the FAA at the following

address: Federal Aviation

Administration, Airports Division,

15000 Aviation Blvd., Lawndale, CA

90261, or San Francisco Airports

District Office, 831 Mitten Road, Room

210, Burlingame, CA 94010–1303. In

addition, one copy of any comments

submitted to the FAA must be mailed or

delivered to Mr. Howard L. Cook,

Airport Manager of the Modesto CityCounty-Harry Sham Field, at the

following address: 617 Airport Way,

Modesto, CA 95354. Air carriers and

foreign air carriers may submit copies of

written comments previously provided

to the city of Modesto under section

158.23 of Part 158.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marlys Vandervelde, Airports Program

Analyst, San Francisco Airports District

Office, 831 Mitten Road, Room 210,

Burlingame, CA 94010–1303, Telephone

(650) 876–2806. The application may be

reviewed in person at this same

location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to impose

and use the revenue from a PFC at

Modesto City—County—Harry Sham

field under the provisions of the

Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion

Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990)

(Public Law 101–508) and Part 158 of

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14

CFR Part 158).

On April 13, 2001, the FAA

determined that the application to

impose and use the revenue from a PFC

submitted by the city of Modesto was

substantially complete within the

requirements of section 158.25 of Part

158. The FAA will approve or

disapprove the application, in whole or

in part, not later than July 12, 2001.

The following is a brief overview of

the impose and use application No. 01–

06–C–00–MOD:

Level of proposed PFC: $3.00.

Proposed charge effective date:

September 1, 2001.

Proposed charge expiration date:

September 1, 2003.

Total estimated PFC revenue:

$124,180.

Brief description of the proposed

projects: Replace General Aviation and

Terminal Security Lights, Purchase

Runway Sweeper and Equipment

Shelter, General Aviation and Terminal

Service Road Seal, Air Carrier and

Transient Aircraft Apron Expansion and

Reconstruction, and Conduct Airport

Master Plan and Environmental Impact

Report.

Class or classes of air carriers which

the public agency has requested not be

required to collect PFCs: None.

Any person may inspect the

application in person at the FAA office

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA

Regional Airports office located at:

Federal Aviation Administration,

Airports Division, 15000 Aviation Blvd.,

Lawndale, CA 90261. In addition, any

person may, upon request, inspect the

application, notice and other documents

germane to the application in person at

the city of Modesto.