alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TEKGRAF FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,425,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,185,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                   620,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,440,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,513,087
<PP&E>                                       1,303,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                (391,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,384,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,211,220
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,328
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,070,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,384,303
<SALES>                                     24,335,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,335,778
<CGS>                                       20,450,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,040,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (4,367)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (184,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (9,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (175,211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (175,211)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Certification filed December 12 , 201 9



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________
No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 316

- C R

__________
IN RE C HRISTOPHER COBOS

O riginal Proceeding

C E R T I F I C A T I O N I have reviewed the “Motion to Disqualify or Recuse and Reverse Judgments” filed in this cause on December 5, 2019. To the extent the document seeks my recusal, I have reviewed the document in chambers. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 16.3(b). I
find no reason to r ecuse myself and, under Rule 16.3(b), certify the issue of my
recusal to the entire court for a determination by the other justices of this court. See Manges v. Guerra , 673 S.W.2d 180, 185 (Tex. 1984); McCullough v. Kitzman , 50 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.

— Wa co 2001, pet. denied).

/s/ Jim R. Wright

JIM R. WRIGHT

SENIOR CHIEF JUSTICE
| ·   | The      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period      ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      13, 2009 | By:  |  /s/ Mark J.  Gabrielson                    |
|--------|------------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |                   |      | Mark      J. Gabrielson                          |
|   |                   |      | President      and Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |                   |      | (Principal      Executive Officer)               |
|   |                   |      |                                             |
| Date:  | November      13, 2009 | By:  |  /s/ Benjamin L.    Palleiko                |
|   |                   |      | Benjamin      L. Palleiko                        |
|   |                   |      | Senior      Vice President and                   |
|   |                   |      | Chief      Financial Officer                     |
|   |                   |      | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |
# C_2021458EN.01000101.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 458/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 458/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10389 – PAI PARTNERS / PASUBIO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 458/01)

On 19 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10389. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10389. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-75798) and related Prospectus of Endwave Corporation and in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49012) pertaining to the 1992 Stock
Option Plan, 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, 2000 Non Employee Directors' Stock
Option Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our report dated
February 3, 2004 with respect to the financial statements and schedule of
Endwave Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2003.

                                            /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 26, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)



The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Logility, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, this report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004 (the Report),
which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Logility, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
purpose.



|                                |  |                         
|------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|This 7th day of September, 2004 |  |                         
|                                |  | /s/ J. Michael Edenfield
|                                |  | J. Michael Edenfield    
|                                |  | Chief Executive Officer 



The undersigned, as the Chief
Financial Officer of Logility, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, this report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Logility, Inc. at the dates and for the
periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.



|                                |  |                        
|------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|This 7th day of September, 2004 |  |                        
|                                |  | /s/ Vincent C. Klinges 
|                                |  | Vincent C. Klinges     
|                                |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Logility, Inc. and will be retained by Logility, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be
deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) 

 

I, Michael E. Spicer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NovaDel Pharma Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [intentionally omitted] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

| Date:  December 14, 2006 | By:    | /S/ MICHAEL E. SPICER                      |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Michael E. Spicer                          |
|                     |   | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FOURTEEN WEEKS ENDED JANUARY 3, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                              96
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                       647
<INVENTORY>                                     25,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,749
<PP&E>                                          25,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,773
<BONDS>                                         18,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,402
<SALES>                                         35,094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,094
<CGS>                                           27,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                       775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,305
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Mak Wai Keung, Shawn, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Centiv, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [language omitted pursuant
     to SEC Release 34-47986] for the Company and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

        (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47986];

        (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 26, 2004

/s/  Mak Wai Keung, Shawn
-----------------------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
A92A1269.

#### LAWAL v. THE STATE.

(424 SE2d 36)

Decided October 6, 1992

Reconsideration denied October 16, 1992

*Dorothy W. Coprich,*for appellant.

Carley, Presiding Judge.

After a bench trial, appellant was found guilty of misdemeanor theft by shoplifting. In *Lawal v. State,*201 Ga. App. 797, 798 (2) (412 SE2d 864) (1991), we vacated appellant’s conviction and remanded the case “to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the question of whether he made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to trial by jury.” Thereafter, the trial court conducted the evidentiary hearing and entered an order finding “that [appellant], being cognizant of [his] right [to a jury trial], nonetheless intelligently elected to have a non-jury trial. [Appellant] personally made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to a trial by jury. See *Pahnke v. The State,*[203 Ga. App. 88 (416 SE2d 324) (1992)].” In the instant case, appellant appeals from the reinstated judgment of conviction and sentence for misdemeanor theft by shoplifting.

1. A transcript of the hearing which resulted in the issuance of the trial court’s order has not been provided on appeal.

“[N]o facts stated in the [order] show on their face that it was incorrect, and we have no way of knowing what other evidence was presented. The presumption is that the trial judge faithfully performed the duties devolving upon him. An appeal with enumerations of error dependent upon consideration of evidence heard by the trial court will, absent a transcript, be affirmed. [Cit.]” *Russell v. State,*155 Ga. App. 555, 556 (3) (271 SE2d 689) (1980). It follows, therefore, that the judgment in the instant case must be affirmed. In the absence of a transcript, it is presumed that the evidence authorized a finding that appellant “elected to have a non-jury trial. [Appellant] personally made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to a jury trial.” *Pahnke v. State,*supra at 90.

2. In the prior appeal, we held that, “[i]n the event the trial court determines from the evidence adduced at [the] hearing that the appellant did make ... a [knowing and intelligent] waiver [of his right to trial by jury], then the conviction and sentence may be reinstated, in which event the appellant shall be entitled to file a new appeal directed *to this issue and this issue alone.”*(Emphasis supplied.) *Lawal v. State,*supra at 798 (2). Accordingly, we will not consider remaining issues, which do not relate to appellant’s waiver of his right to trial by jury.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Johnson, JJ., concur.*

*843
      *Keith C. Martin, Solicitor, Jackie N. Stanton, Assistant Solicitor,*for appellee.
MISC. ORD. NO. 6-04 WAS THE LAST IN THE SERIES FOR 2004

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

Misc. No. 1-05

IN RE: STANDING PANEL ON ADMISSION AND DISCIPLINE

Before IVERS, Chief Judge, and STEINBERG, GREENE, KASOLD, HAGEL,

MOORMAN, LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R

Rule 1(c) of the Court's Rules of Admission and Practice (Rules) provides for referring cases

under those Rules to a standing panel if the Court decides to establish such a panel on a rotating or

permanent basis. Because the Court finds that there is a need to have consistency and continuity,

and to utilize most effectively its expertise, in the handling and resolution of disciplinary cases

coming before the Court under the Rules, it has established a Standing Panel on Admission and

Discipline (the Standing Panel), which will consist of three judges of the Court determined on a

rotating basis and serving for substantial, staggered terms. In light of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Standing Panel will consist of Chief Judge Ivers and Judges Greene and

Kasold, effective immediately.

DATED: January 27, 2005 BY THE COURT:

DONALD L. IVERS

Chief Judge